T H U R S D A Y   M O R N I N G   E X T R E M E   M A R K E T S
A complimentary service from INO.com ( http://www.ino.com/ )

CDCD   FREE: NetFutures' exclusive eStarter Kit CD-ROM
CDCD   http://www.ino.com/specials/netfutures/

Andrew,

KEY EVENTS TO WATCH FOR:

8:30 AM ET. USDA weekly grain exports sales reports.

8:30 AM ET. State unemployment claims for the week ended Saturday
(Previous: +15,000 at 407,000; Forecast: 400,000.)

8:30 AM ET. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas President Robert McTeer
speaks to Texas Tech 2001 Scholarship Breakfast-topic TBA.

9:00 AM ET. May New York purchasing managers report (April: 45.4.)

10:00 AM ET. May Chicago purchasing managers report (April: 38.9.)

10:00 AM ET. April help-wanted index (March: -5 to 66.)

10:00 AM ET. Chicago Fed national activity index.

11:30 AM ET. Cleveland Fed Bank President Jerry Jordan speaks on a
less fragmented financial services industry to the Ohio Banker's
Association; Columbus, Ohio.

12:30 PM ET Treasury releases results of $35 billion, 14-day cash
management bills auction.

2:30 PM ET. Treasury announces size of 13- and 26-week bills.

4:30 PM ET. Money supply statistics.

KEY HEADLINES:

Fed.'s McTeer say's he is unsure when US economic growth will pick
up.

Fed.'s McTeer: US second quarter growth is unlikely to be much more
than the first quarter's 1.3%.

O'Neill says Fed, Bush administration have acted to boost the
economy.

Fed.'s Moskow: It's crucial for consumer spending to hold up.

Redbook says US May retailer sales were up 0.6% from April.

US weekly chain store sales fell 0.1% for week ended May 26.

Financier Soros says ECB too slow on interest rate decisions.

Dow Jones industrials close below 11,000 due to sell off in tech
stocks.

From Intel to Starbucks, Nasdaq owners to gain from exchanges IPO's.

The STOCK INDEXES & MARKETS

The NASDAQ and S&P 500 were modestly higher overnight due to light
short covering as both markets consolidated some of this week's
losses. I would not be surprised to see the Nasdaq try and test if
not fill Wednesday's gap at 2170.58 on Thursday. Nevertheless, this
week's trendline breakout along with the downturn by momentum
indicators strongly suggests that additional weakness into early-June
appears likely. May's reaction low crossing at 2057.99 is the
Nasdaq's next target. The Sept. S&P was also higher overnight due to
short covering following Wednesday's gap down and lower close.
Wednesday's low fell short of testing May's reaction low at 1256. If
this support is broken, it would open the door for a larger-degree
decline during the first half of June. Momentum indicators are
bearish, which suggest that additional weakness is possible.
Meanwhile, the Dow closed sharply lower on Wednesday confirming the
recent breakout below this spring's uptrend line that crosses near
11,100. If the decline off last week's high continues, May's reaction
low crossing at 10,774.10 is the Dow's next target.

European markets were mixed in overnight trading as overnight gains
on Wall Street tempered some of this week's losses. The UK FTSE- 100
was down 14.20 points at 5782.70 while the German DAX-30 was up 33.83
points at 6075.05 as of 10:01 BST.

The Nikkei gapped down and closed sharply lower overnight as it broke
out below the 38% retracement level of this spring's rally crossing
at 13,363. If the decline continues, the 50% retracement level
crossing at 12,995 is the Nikkei's next target. Momentum indicators
remain bearish signaling that additional weakness near- term is
possible. The overnight sell off was due to continued selling
pressure of high-tech stocks. The Nikkei closed down 1.7% or 231.21
points to 13,262.14.

INTEREST RATES

September bonds opened higher overnight as they continue to drift
sideways ahead of Friday's employment report. Trade volume remains
thin as Sept. bonds found light support on expectations for
additional weakness in the equity markets on Thursday. Momentum
indicators are turning neutral warning traders to use caution as a
short-term low may be in or near. If the decline off last week's high
resumes, May's reaction low crossing at 98-06 is Sept.'s next target.

The German bond market or Bunds continue to suffer from the euro's
fall to its lowest level against the US Dollar in six months. The
June Bunds were last down 0.24 at 105.83.

Japanese government bond markets were higher overnight due to
weakness in the Nikkei. The lead June 10-year JGB futures closed at
140.59 yen, up 0.40 while the yield on the benchmark No. 231 June
10-year cash bond stood at 1.240%, down 0.040 as of 1515 JT.

The ENERGY MARKETS were mostly lower in overnight trading as worries
about refiner's ability to meet summer driving demand continue to
abate. This week's API inventory data review is as follows. Crude oil
stocks fell sharply last week by 3.976 million barrels while unleaded
gasoline stocks rose by 1.611 million barrels last week. Distillate
stocks including heating oil rose by 1.919 million barrels. Refinery
capacity was up 1.00 percentage point of capacity at 95.3%.

July crude oil was lower overnight as it extended Wednesday's decline
due to spillover weakness from unleaded gas. Closes below last week's
low at 28.10 would confirm the recent breakout below this spring's
uptrend line. If the breakout is confirmed, the late-April reaction
low crossing at 27.25 is July's next target. Momentum indicators are
bearish signaling that sideways to lower prices are possible.

July heating oil was lower overnight and is below this spring's
uptrend line crossing near 77.60. Multiple closes below this uptrend
line are needed to confirm a top and trend change has taken place.
Spillover selling from unleaded gas continues to pull the rest of the
complex lower. If a trendline breakout is confirmed, May's reaction
low crossing at 74.55 is July's next target. Momentum indicators are
bearish signaling that additional weakness is possible.

July unleaded gas was sharply lower for the fifth day in a row in
overnight trading as spread unwinding continues and concerns over
summer gasoline supplies ease. Overnight losses led to a breakout
below the March/May uptrend line crossing near 93.25. Multiple closes
below this support level would open the door for a test of May's
reaction low crossing at 91.20 later this spring. Momentum indicators
remain bearish signaling that additional weakness into early-June is
possible.

July Henry Hub natural gas was lower overnight despite Wednesday's
upside reversal, which was due to short covering following this
week's spike below last October's low crossing at 3.86. Multiple
closes below this support level would opened the door for a possible
test of fib support crossing at 3.64 later this spring. The daily ADX
(a trend-following indicator) remains in a bearish modes signaling
that additional weakness near-term is possible. However, momentum
indicators have become extremely oversold warning bears to use
caution as a corrective bounce is possible.

CURRENCIES

The September Euro posted a new low for the year overnight and has
broken out below last November's low crossing at 85.00. If the
decline continues, a test of last October's lows crossing at 83.77 is
possible later this spring. The daily ADX (a trend-following
indicator) is bearish signaling that sideways to lower prices are
possible into early-June are possible.

The September British Pound opened sharply lower overnight due to
light profit taking as it consolidated some of its gains off last
week's low. Nevertheless, momentum indicators are turning neutral to
bullish, which suggests that a short-term low might be in place. I am
looking for sideways trading to continue into the early-part of June.

The September Swiss Franc opened to new contract lows in overnight
trading signaling that this year's decline is resuming. A lower close
during the day session would confirm the recent breakout below last
October's low crossing at .5643 while opening the door for a possible
test of weekly support crossing at .5488 later this year. The ADX (a
trend-following indicator) has entered a bearish trend mode signaling
that sideways to lower prices into June are possible.

The September Canadian Dollar was lower overnight following
Wednesday's key reversal down. The stage is set for a test of this
spring's uptrend line crossing near .6440. Multiple closes below this
support level would confirm a trend change has taken place while
opening the door for sideways to lower prices during the first half
of June. Momentum indicators are bearish warning traders that
additional weakness is possible.

The September Japanese Yen was lower in narrow trading overnight as
it continues to consolidate below trading range resistance that
crosses at .8425. Stochastics and RSI remain bullish but are nearing
their respective overbought zones signaling that time might be
running out for bulls. Closes above.8483 are needed to confirm an
upside breakout of this spring's trading range.

PRECIOUS METALS

August comex gold was lower overnight but is working on a possible
inside day following Wednesday's sharp loss and spike below April's
uptrend line crossing near 267.50. Multiple closes below the uptrend
line would confirm a breakout while opening the door for a test of
this spring's low crossing at 257.30 later this year. Stochastics and
RSI are bearish signaling that additional weakness into June is
likely.

July silver was steady overnight as it is working on a possible
inside day to consolidate some of Wednesday's sharp losses. However,
Momentum indicators have turned bearish signaling that additional
weakness near-term is possible. If the decline off last week's high
continues, a test of trading range support crossing at 4.31 is July's
next target later this year.

July copper was lower overnight as it continues this week's sharp
decline. July's inability to post a short covering bounce on
Wednesday underscores the weak tone of the market as the door is open
for additional weakness and a possible test of May's low at 74.75
later this spring. Momentum indicators are bearish signaling that
sideways to lower prices into early-June appears likely.

GRAINS

July corn was fractionally higher overnight as traders await this
morning's export sales report. Pre-report estimates range from
700,000 to 950,000 metric tonnes. While this week's export inspection
report on Tuesday was higher than the previous week, it was still
well below the pace needed to meet the latest USDA export projection.
Traders are expecting to see the USDA to lower their export
projection for this year in the upcoming June supply/demand report.
Any further cuts in export demand will only add to the bearish
carryout level, which is currently projected at 1.989 billion bushels
by this fall. Cool/wet weather across the western Corn Belt continues
to slow early crop development however, the latest planting progress
report shows that 95% of the crop has been planted making this a
non-issue. The recent breakout below weekly support crossing at 1.91
1/2 has opened the door for a possible test of last summer's low
crossing at 1.74 1/2 later this year. Early calls are for July corn
to open steady to a 1/4 cent higher this morning.

July wheat was fractionally higher in overnight trading following
Wednesday's downside reversal. Light support came from light position
squaring ahead of the release of this morning's export sales report
and news that Japan bought 100,000 metric tonnes of July wheat.
Pre-report sales estimates range from 200,000 to 400,000 metric
tonnes. It will take multiple closes above broken support crossing at
2.65 to temper the near term bearish outlook in July wheat. Until
then, the door remains open for a test of weekly gap support crossing
at 2.56 then the long-term pivot level at 2.50 later this spring.
Early calls are for July wheat to open steady to 3/4 of a cent higher
this morning.

SOYBEAN COMPEX

July soybeans were fractionally higher in overnight trading due to
short covering as it consolidated some of this week's losses. This
week's trendline breakout confirmed that a double top was posted with
last Friday's high. The latest planting progress report came in above
the five-year average, which eased planting concerns. Demand remains
strong, which should force the USDA to raise this years export
projection in the June supply/demand report. However,
increased-planted acreage in the US along with a lack of threatening
weather continues to offset the strong demand outlook. Pre-report
sales estimates range from 150,000 to 250,000 metric tonnes. Momentum
indicators are bearish signaling that sideways to lower prices into
early-June appear likely. Early calls are for July soybeans to open
steady to a 1/2 cent higher this morning.

July soybean meal was higher overnight due to short covering
following this week's trendline breakout. While domestic and foreign
demand remain strong, this week's break in soybeans brought some
reality back to the market that there are still plenty of soybeans
around. A short covering bounce on Thursday is possible if today's
export sales report comes in at or above expectations. Pre-report
estimates range from 75,000 to 150,000 metric tonnes. Momentum
indicators are turning bearish signaling that sideways to lower
prices into early-June appear likely. Early calls are for July
soybean meal to open 20 to 30-cents higher this morning.

LIVESTOCK

August lean hogs closed up $1.65 at $63.35. Prices closed near the
session high. The strong rebound continued, after limit-up gains seen
Tuesday. The market just got too extended on the downside, especially
in the wake Friday's bullish USDA Hogs & Pigs report. Fund buying was
featured Wednesday, sources said. Prices broke out above and negated
a steep five-week-old downtrend. The bulls now have the near-term
edge. However, I would not be surprised to see some sideways
consolidation in the coming sessions. Next resistance lies at $64.00.
First support is located at the 62.00 level.

August live cattle closed off $0.45 at $73.70. Speculative traders
took profits after the recent big runup had pushed the market into
oversold territory. I would not be surprised to see more of a
downside correction soon. Prices pushed to a fresh four-month high
Tuesday. Resistance lies at the $74.50 level. First support lies at
the $73.40 level.

SOFTS

July N.Y. sugar closed 15 points lower at 8.59 cents today. Prices
today dropped to another fresh four-week low as the recent higher
volatility at higher price levels has proven bearish. Also, the rare
and usually bearish broadening formation continues to play out on the
daily bar chart. Bears have the technical edge at present. However,
the market is overdone on the downside at present, on a technical
basis. Next support comes in at 8.40 cents. First resistance is now
seen at 7.72 cents.

July N.Y. coffee closed 65 points lower at 59.15 cents. Prices came
within 10 points of the contract low set in April. Bears rule. Bulls
can only hope for a strong rebound from the present price level,
which would signal a big double-bottom reversal. Still, given the
upcoming frost season in South America, I suspect the downside from
present levels will be limited in the coffee market. Speculative
short-players won't want to get too brave at this time of year. First
support comes in at the contract low of 58.80 cents. First resistance
is now seen at 63.00 cents.

July N.Y. cocoa closed $39 lower today, at $964. More technical
damage was inflicted by the bears as prices hit another fresh
three-week low, as there was follow-through selling from Friday's
gap-lower trade. The bears are in control, but the market is
short-term overdone on the downside at present. Next support comes in
at $955. First resistance is now seen at $1,009.

July cotton closed 32 points lower at 40.72 cents. Prices hit a fresh
contract low just yesterday, in the wake of a bearish USDA cotton
consumption report last Friday. Cotton is in a strong bear market and
any rebounds will be selling opportunities for the bears--for now.
Next support lies at 39.95 cents--the contract low. First resistance
is seen around 42.00 cents.
_____________________________________________________________________

THE MOST POWERFUL TRADING METHOD EVER!
_____________________________________________________________________

Re:	One futures trader turned $400 into over $200,000,000...
http://store.ino.com/private/1A433/TWTS-TurtleSecrets

Dear Andrew:

Now you can learn the most powerful, valuable and profitable
trading method EVER!

. . . Now Revealed In NEW Trading Course
For Just A Small, No-Risk Investment

World Famous "Turtle" Commodity Trading Method
. . . Now Available To You

On Video And In Clear Trading Lessons
In The Privacy Of Your Home
. . . At A VERY Affordable Low, Low Price!!

Fifteen years ago, one futures trader stunned the entire trading
world as he methodically turned $400 into over $200,000,000
trading futures. In 1983, he personally taught his trading
strategies and systems to 14 people he nicknamed "The Turtles."

In the next five years, the Turtles earned some $35,000,000 as
their percent of profits from the $175,000,000 profit they made
for their teacher (who bankrolled their trading)!

Yes, those zeroes are correct.

As a group, the "Turtles" have been trading now for over 14 years
and currently manage $2,000,000,000 (2 BILLION dollars) given to
them from people and institutions all over the world. Estimated
profits for the 16 months ending this past April are over
$300,000,000 (that's 300 million dollars actual, documented
profits!)

Even now - 14 years later - five of the world's top 10 futures
money managers are Turtle traders!

Now You Can Learn The "Turtle" Trading System And Strategy
In An Exciting Personal Trading Course - In Your Living Room

READ OUR FREE 16 PAGE
ONLINE BROCHURE NOW BY VISITING:

http://store.ino.com/private/1A433/TWTS-TurtleSecrets

Turtle Trading System Revealed!

Order Toll Free 800-538-7424 - 410-867-7424

All claims on third-party products are made by the publisher
and not by INO.com. All Products Guaranteed.

_____________________________________________________________________

T H A N K   Y O U
_____________________________________________________________________

Thank you for subscribing to the Morning Extreme Markets from INO.com
( http://www.ino.com/ ). If you want to subscribe to our other email
services, or would like to modify your profile please visit
http://www.ino.com/email/.

To subscribe a friend, visit:
  http://www.ino.com/email/

To unsubscribe, visit:
  http://www.ino.com/email/remove/?email=alewis@enron.com&list=morning

--
Copyright 1998-2001 INO.com. All Rights Reserved.


I think it's the first doc.  Check the "Re" for the deal number.  Thanks.
Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/14/99 11:16
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jarrod Cyprow                           12/13/99 09:23 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Onconto Falls (Swaptions)


I hope Mexico was fun!

Are you driving today?  My guess is class won't get out early, since he
hasn't been there in 3 weeks!  (But what do I know!)

-Jackie

Jacqueline Kelly
Treasury
Charles Schwab & Co, Inc
(415) 667-3915

Warning: All e-mail sent to or from this address will be received or
otherwise
recorded by the Charles Schwab corporate e-mail system and is subject to
archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to, someone other than
the
recipient.

 - C.DTF


I pulled the recent forward curves (confidential; not for external release
without approval from West Power) and computed the stranded costs associated
with the DWR contracts.  Assuming SP15 on peak (which is conservative since
many of the contracts had off peak energy in them) the total overmarket is
$21 billion, or $13 billion discounted at 12%.  The former number is most
comparable to the $40+ billion DWR expenditure commitement number.

If we want to use this for any sort of external message I would like to
refine further.

Alan


Here it is.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/22/2001 12:41 PM -----

 - Vieth_Agenda_Dec__5-24-01 agenda.doc


Actually, I sent everything to Mark Whitt in Denver for execution.

Steph

Chris Meyer@ECT
03/01/2001 07:53 AM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Huber Contracts

Stephanie Miller has them.

chris

To: Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Huber Contracts

Did you ever receive these documents?  If so, I need the originals.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001 05:35 PM -----

	"Brian Stone" <htebs@huber.com>
	02/05/2001 10:56 AM

		 To: <Chris.Meyer@enron.com>
		 cc: <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>, <Mark.Whitt@enron.com>,
<Stephanie.Miller@enron.com>
		 Subject: Re: Huber Contracts

Chris,
Huber has executed the following documents today:

1. Trailblazer Assignment and Assumption Agreement signed add'l
original

2.  Amended and Restated Transaction Agreement #2

3.  Enfolio Master Firm Purchase / Sale Agreement replacing a
previously executed "fax" version.

I will overnight the documents to you.  Please have them executed and
return one of each for my files.

Thanks for your help, and best of luck in your new venture at Enron.
Brian Stone.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000
02:37 PM ---------------------------

"Julie Haviland" <julie.haviland@PaineWebber.COM> on 04/28/2000 12:57:40 PM
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Some municipal bonds for you to look at.....

I called out muni desk to have them take a look at the current munis avaiable
that looked best at this time to invest $50,000 going out to 30 years for
you.  The following is what they came up with....

Pecos Co TX Cert of Obl w/a Coupon 5.5% Matures in 02/01/11 callable at par
on 02/01/07 offered at $101.964 - AAA rated

Brownsville Util Rev w/a coupon of 5.25% maturing in 09/01/15 callable at par
on 09/01/05 offered at $97.425 - AAA rated

Alvin TX ISD PSF w/a coupon of 5.75% maturing in 08/15/22 callable at par on
08/15/10 offered at par - AAA rated

Houston TX Air Revs w/a coupon of 5.00% maturing in 07/01/28 callable at par
on 07/01/08 offered at 86.479 - AAA rated

Remember, these are subject to change, but if these interest you and they are
not still available, I will see if there is something comparable.

Talk to you soon.  Please call me with any questions.  Thanks, Julie


There is a 30 minute meeting every morning on the 28th floor at 8:30 about
systems issues from the prior night and to discuss what books were not
officialized.  I have gone to this meeting this week, and I think that we
should always have a representative in the meeting.  Here is what I propose:
We alternate weeks going to this meeting.

Week of :
Dec. 4   - Jeff Gossett
Dec. 11 - Darron Giron
Dec. 18 - David Baumbach
Dec. 25 - Will Kelly
Jan. 1    -  Kam Keiser
Jan. 8    - Errol Mclaughlin

And then we will start over again.
If you can not go,  make sure that someone goes in your place.

Thanks

Irena and Elizabeth -  Can you please add these daily meetings to the
appropriate calender?

Thanks


Good evening:

The Assembly just adjourned for the evening.  Session will reconvene at 9:30
am tomorrow.  None of the Budget trailer bills were taken up this evening.

AB 82xx (Keeley) passed out of Appropriations tonight.  Assemblyman Wrights
bill was amended into AB 50xx.  It passed out of policy but has not been
referred to Appropriations.  If you have any questions, please call me in
the morning.

RSC

Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
Phone:(916) 319-2005


Chris,

Have you been able to figure out if Enron has billed Ashland for Jan, Feb and
Mar on an old 1022/day Columbia contract?  If so, please let me know so we can
make the appropriate adjustment with the Ashland volumes.

Thanks


Liz, I would love to go.  Can I let you know tomorrow as I am still not sure
what time by obligations here are over?    Mark


Please see attached letter


I guess this is good news unless they introduce the "next steps" section at
the meeting with a slide that is titled "Step One:  Shutting Your Sorry-Ass
Pipeline Down ONce and For All" .   Seriously, the agenda doesn't seem to
have any flavor of escalation, which is great given the  lack of attractive
alternatives for our team right now.  Talk to you about this tomorrow.  DF

07/05/2000 04:10 PM
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
07/05/2000 04:10 PM
07/05/2000 04:10 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RE: Proposed meeting in Flagstaff

Guys - just fyi.   Ignore the notes and see the agenda.  nothing surp[rising
so far..
---------------------- Forwarded by Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron on 07/05/2000
04:10 PM ---------------------------

"Boschee, Rodney" <RAB9@pge.com> on 07/03/2000 02:16:27 PM
To: Michel.Nelson@enron.com, Earl.Chanley@enron.com,
Larry.Campbell@enron.com, Ray.Smith@enron.com, Louis.Soldano@enron.com,
David.Roensch@enron.com, John.Shafer@enron.com, "'Rich.Jolly@enron.com'"
<Rich.Jolly@enron.com>
cc: "Anderson, David W (Law)" <DWA3@pge.com>

Subject: RE: Proposed meeting in Flagstaff

Rich,
Attached is a draft agenda for our July 13 meeting.
Most of us will be staying the night of 7/12 at the Holiday Inn in
Flagstaff.  Your directions look pretty clear but if you could send me via
e-mail or fax (415-973-6112) a map that would help keep us from getting
lost.

thanks,
 <<twpcb41.doc>>

rod

> ----------
> From:  Rich.Jolly@enron.com[SMTP:Rich.Jolly@enron.com]
> Sent:  Monday, July 03, 2000 5:55 AM
> To:  Boschee, Rodney; Michel.Nelson@enron.com; Earl.Chanley@enron.com;
> Larry.Campbell@enron.com; Ray.Smith@enron.com; Louis.Soldano@enron.com;
> David.Roensch@enron.com; John.Shafer@enron.com
> Subject:  RE: Proposed meeting in Flagstaff
>
> Rod we didn't have any luck finding a meeting room or motel rooms in
> Flagstaff. It's seems like everyone in the state is meeting there next
> week. We'll need to meet at our Flagstaff Compressor Station which is
> about
> 18 miles West of Flagstaff on 1-40. The road to our station is named
> Transwestern leading off the interstate. After exiting turn left and
> follow the access road  which is paved 6 miles around to the station. Let
> me know if you fly in that morning and we'll pick you up or what ever will
> work for you. I'll probably stay in Winslow which is about 50 miles East
> of
> Flagstaff, but will be in Flagstaff early on the 13th.
>
> The start time for the meeting might change because of this, but I'll wait
> to hear from you and we'll work something out..
>
> Thanks Rich
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron on 07/03/2000
> 06:09 AM ---------------------------
>
>
> Rich Jolly on 06/26/2000 08:52:51 PM
>
> To:   "Boschee, Rodney" <RAB9@pge.com>
> cc:
>
> Subject:  RE: Proposed meeting in Flagstaff  (Document link: Rich Jolly)
>
> Rod
> Thanks and I look forward to hearing from you. I'll send you some things
> we
> want to talk about. I'm sure they are similar to yours.
> Have a good week.
> Rich
>
>
>
> "Boschee, Rodney" <RAB9@pge.com> on 06/26/2000 05:53:36 PM
>
> To:   "'Rich.Jolly@enron.com'" <Rich.Jolly@enron.com>
> cc:
>
> Subject:  RE: Proposed meeting in Flagstaff
>
>
> Rich,
> Thanks for the quick turn-around.  8:00 am start sounds good.  I will talk
> with Dave (our attorney) regard he and Lou making the trip.
> I will put together agenda items and send off to you early next week.  I
> will also advise you of our plans.
> Thanks,
>
> rod
>
> > ----------
> > From:   Rich.Jolly@enron.com[SMTP:Rich.Jolly@enron.com]
> > Sent:   Monday, June 26, 2000 3:42 PM
> > To:     Boschee, Rodney
> > Subject:     Re: Proposed meeting in Flagstaff
> >
> >
> > Rod good to hear from you. TW should have about the same number of
> people
> > attending. Like you we will invite our attorney's and  see what they
> say.
> > If 08:00 for a start time will work for you we'll plan on it. I'll need
> > your help on items to be discussed. If you would like for me to get
> > reservations for you let me know. We'll plan to have the meeting at
> Little
> > America, which is a good palace to stay also.
> >
> > I plan to be in Flagstaff sometime the 12th. I'll be driving from
> Durango,
> > Colo. so I'm not sure of the time. I'll be on vacation the rest of this
> > week but will have my computer and  will be checking phone mail. Thanks
> > and
> > I'm looking forward to the meeting.
> >
> > Rich
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Boschee, Rodney" <RAB9@pge.com> on 06/26/2000 03:12:50 PM
> >
> > To:   "'rjolly@enron.com'" <rjolly@enron.com>
> > cc:
> >
> > Subject:  Proposed meeting in Flagstaff
> >
> >
> > I understand you will be coordinating the meeting we scheduled for July
> 13
> > in Flagstaff.  I anticipate PG&E will have about 7 individuals
> attending,
> > depending if we invite our attorneys.
> >
> > I would suggest we get started early in the morning of the 13.  We will
> be
> > arriving the night before so an early start will allow us greater
> > flexibility on getting home that afternoon.  I am in the process of
> > reviewing our alternatives for getting in and out of Flagstaff.
> >
> > Let me know what your tentative plans our.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Rod Boschee
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>

 - twpcb41.doc


Fare is $248.00

                                          SCHWIEGER/JAMES

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002

  DATE:  MAR 08 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

AIR FRANCE            07AUG PARIS          COPENHAGEN     1250P   245P
AF 2350    W          TUE   CHARLES DE GAU COPENHAGEN APT
                            EQP: BOEING 737-300
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED

AIR FRANCE            19AUG COPENHAGEN     PARIS          105P    300P
AF 2051    W          SUN   COPENHAGEN APT CHARLES DE GAU
                           EQP: BOEING 737-500
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  AF/267MRT

                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

=====
Vitol Travel Services
1100 Louisiana Suite 3230
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone - 713-759-1444
Fax - 713-759-9006

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


You know what - I agree!!

Don't let it go to your head.

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 06/22/2000
12:37 PM ---------------------------

John J Lavorato@ENRON
06/22/2000 11:48 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Lavorato Self Evaluation/Accomplishments

I'm just simply better than everyone else.


Michael

Gerald and I are available (at the moment) all day on Monday as well.  Let us
know when and where and we'll be there.   I'd change the wording to Password
application in the letter since that is what it's titled.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886

	Michael Eiben
	12/06/2000 10:46 AM

		 To: Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Romeo D'Souza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B
Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawn MacPhail/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: HPL-Online Final OUA and PA

I think a demo is definitely in order.  I am (at the moment) available all
day Monday, December 11th.  Let me know what time and I will get a room.  If
we can make it after 10:30, then Ed Gottlob can possibly join us.  He hasn't
seen the site either. Ed - Let me know if you are interested.

Eric - the online registration form that I refer to is the Password
Application.  I can change the wording to reflect this.

Romeo/Shawn - See the attached doc's below and place these in the site.

We are in the home stretch for phase I !!!!

thanks for all of your help.

mve

Eric Gillaspie
12/06/2000 09:52 AM
To: Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HPL-Online Final OUA and PA

Michael,

I've attached the password application and Online User Agreement in order for
you to place these finalized versions on the website.

One question/clarification:  You refer to an on-line registration form in
your previous e-mail and in the HIWAY Promotion Letter, I assume you are
referring to the Password Application?

Gerald is checking on the trademark/name availability for Information HIWAY,
and will get back to you shortly.
Also, Gerald and I would like to sit down with you sometime early next week
and have you demo the website for us before it goes live; are you available?

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886

	Michael Eiben
	12/05/2000 02:31 PM

		 To: Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Legal And Privacy Information.htm

looks fine with me.  is the next step placing the finalized versions of the
HPL Online registration & OUA out to the web site?  we also plan to mail a
letter to our customers along with inserting these documents.  the letter is
attached.

mve

Eric Gillaspie
12/05/2000 01:55 PM
To: Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Legal And Privacy Information.htm

Michael,

Attached for your review and comment is the updated draft incorporating
certain copyright and contractual relationship language.  The new sections
that were added are Section 1(c) and Section 4.  If you have any questions or
comments please give me a call.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886

	Michael Eiben
	12/04/2000 04:11 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Legal And Privacy Information.htm

we are trying to finalize this section.  could you guys give us your input?

thanks,    mve
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 04:08
PM ---------------------------

meiben@ect.enron.com on 11/30/2000 04:21:03 PM
Please respond to meiben@ect.enron.com
To: michael.eiben@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Legal And Privacy Information.htm

LEGAL AND PRIVACY INFORMATION

1. All information and material including images, text and audio on this
website is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its subsidiaries (and/or its or
its subsidiaries' licensors) (collectively "Enron") and is subject to
copyright.Trading Innovation, Endless possibilities, Enron.com, Enron, Enron
& design, Enron Corp., Enron Corp. & design, Enron with fanciful E, Enron
with fanciful E (color), are all trademarks owned by Enron Corp. All other
trade marks on this website are the property of their respective owners. You
are entitled to view, copy and print any documents from this website but only
for your own internal business purposes. Any sale, transmission or
redistribution of this website or its content, and any copying, modification
or other use of this website or its content for any purposes other than your
own internal business purposes, are strictly prohibited.
2. This website is provided solely for information purposes and, with the
exception of this "Legal and Privacy" statement, is not intended to, and
shall not, constitute any offer or acceptance with respect to any
transactions or other matters. This website shall not create any legal
relationship between you and Enron, unless you have signed a Password
Application, in which case the Online User Agreement and all terms and
conditions referred to therein shall govern your access and utilization of
this website. Copies of the Online User Agreement may be obtained through the
"Registration" Section on this website. This website is intended only for
commercial enterprises in certain specified jurisdictions.
3. This website and the information and material which it contains are
subject to change at any time by Enron without notice and Enron reserves the
right to suspend, terminate or restrict your access to or use of this
website. All warranties, whether express or implied, as to the accuracy or
completeness of the information contained on this website or in respect of
any materials or products referred to on this website are hereby excluded to
the extent permitted by law.

NETSCAPE NETCENTER	spacer	??Search??-??WebMail??-??My Netscape??-??Buddy Chat??-??Help
??-??Download??
		spacer

Check out our advertiser! Click here.

	[IMAGE]Home > ?Netscape?Search		?[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	Search Results

		- Search Categories -Arts & EntertainmentBusinessComputing &
InternetGamesHealthHome &
FamilyNetscapeNewsRecreationReferenceRegionalScience &
TechnologyShoppingSociety & LifestylesSportsWorld
			[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

	Search Here:
	[IMAGE]
	amazon.com
	 legal and...
	Buy Books Here
	Holiday Shopping

	[IMAGE]

	Click here!

	?

	[IMAGE]
	Specialized Searches
	Yellow Pages
	People Finder
	Maps and Directions
	Product Search
	Decision Guides
	Local Information
	International Search

	[IMAGE]
	Search again for
	'  legal and...  ' using
	Google

	[IMAGE]
	Learn More
	Search directly from your browser.
	Internet Keywords
	Netscape Search
	Affiliate Program
	Frequent Questions
	Tips on Searching

	[IMAGE]
	 Get Involved
	Help build the largest human-edited directory on the web.
	Become an Editor
	Suggest a Site
	Give Feedback

	Get the latest
	Communicator.
	  [IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

					Search Results for ' legal and privacy page
					[IMAGE]

					[IMAGE]
					Reviewed Web Sites
					Web sites reviewed and categorized by a team of editors.
					1 - 1 ?of ? 1

					 CPierson's Cyberlaw Page
					Links to cases, statutes, and legal information relating to the Internet,
including First Amendment, intellectual property, privacy, commerce, and
crime.
					http://www.cpierson.com/
					found in:? Society > Law > Legal Information > Computer and Technology Law
?>? Legal Links
					?

					[IMAGE]

					 Search for 'legal and privacy page' with these other search engines:
					AltaVista |  AskJeeves | Excite | GoTo |  HotBot | LookSmart | Lycos

					[IMAGE]
					??Search Again or Ask a Question
					[IMAGE]

					???
						[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	??Netcenter Help??-??Site Map??-??Advertise with Us??-??What's
New??-??What's Cool 	[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
Check out our advertiser! Click here.
,?2000 Netscape. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy


Actually I already have plans with the "girls" from Accounting.  I think
we're going to Lupe's.  You are invited if you want to come.  But give me a
definite yes or no...none of this "I'd like to" crap.

We're going to leave at 11:30.

Robin


Gerald:  Attached are the memo and draft letter we discussed this morning.

I hope they are helpful.

Craig

 <<Alternatives memo 9-28-00.doc>>  <<Drft Wildhorse ltr 9-28-00.doc>>

 - Alternatives memo 9-28-00.doc
 - Drft Wildhorse ltr 9-28-00.doc


Mark your calendars for Wednesday, September 15.  Details to follow.


Please contact Gia Maisashvili (713-853-4346) or John Neslage (713-853-6827)
and let them know which working group you would like to participate in.

Thanks,
Marcia


We are pleased to announce the creation of a new group - Asset Marketing -
within Enron Americas. The Asset Marketing group will have responsibility for
the asset divestment function within Enron Americas and work with Generation
Investments on selected portfolio acquisitions as well as managing power
origination funding requirements with Treasury.

Don Miller will head the Asset Marketing group and will report directly to
the Office of the Chair, Enron Americas. Joining Don's group will be Stuart
Zisman.  Stuart was formerly in ENA Legal, having most recently worked on the
sale of ENA's peaker plants with Don.

Please join us in congratulating Don and Stuart in their new roles.


For now, have her boxes delivered to the spot behind your desk.  I sent Wes a
message and copied you on that.  I can't remember the name of the person who
works for Wes that handles moves.   Lisa filled in for her while she was out
on medical leave.  She is back.  Can you get with her right away and see what
you can come up with?  Best situation would be for Beth to sit near me.

Also, Bob Hall has someone who is coordinating space needs for us now that
Lisa is gone.  Can you check with her, too?

Also, Jeff Shankman called me last week to ask how we could speed up our
(Energy Ops) move off of 30.  I don't know who is left on 30.  Can you get
the person that reports to Bob Hall to give me an update on our moves from 30
so that I can get back with Jeff this week?  Thanks. --Sally

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Patti Thompson                           01/16/2001 12:41 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Beth's location

Sally,

Beth's assistant is wanting to know where Beth will be sitting - where they
are to ship her boxes.  Any ideas or anything you want me to do regarding
this?

PT
---------------------- Forwarded by Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
12:42 PM ---------------------------
From: Janine Treader on 01/16/2001 06:29 PM GMT
To: Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Beth's location

Hi Patti,

This will probably be the first of many emails in the next couple of weeks.

Do you have a location as to where Beth will be sitting over there?  We'll be
packing up her boxes soon to ship over and for future post etc.

Also, she will need a new extension number.  She would most definately prefer
an 853 number and if you can use her VP status to help her get one if they
refuse (her words) then that would be great.  Her old number was 853-5521
although someone else may have that now.

Thank you for your help.  It is very much appreciated.

Janine


pls print.  thanks. df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/07/2000
09:14 PM ---------------------------

03/07/2000 06:37 PM
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
03/07/2000 06:37 PM
03/07/2000 06:37 PM
To: Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: PG&E / TW Meeting Minutes

Mike - please see the redlined changes. As you can see my skills in
manipulating a table are limited.   Thx.

	From:  Michel Nelson                           03/07/2000 05:34 PM

To: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: PG&E / TW Meeting Minutes

Lou - Before I send these anywhere else, please review and suggest changes.
Mike


Can you forward alison the template for an omnibus swap.  The attached
appears to be an EOL template.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 03:29 PM -----

	Allison McHenry@EES
	10/10/2000 03:16 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Omnibus

The Confirmation I'm wanting is the other form you gave us which under
General Terms starts with "Notional Quantity per Determination Period". Do
you have it? Thanks.

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 10/10/2000 03:07 PM
To: Allison McHenry/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Omnibus

That's what I just sent you....

	Allison McHenry@EES
	10/10/2000 03:04 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Omnibus

Thanks Tana. Do you also have the Confirmation (SWAP) form that said "EOLID"?
I think that was the form we understood you to say was the "preferred" form.
Thanks again.

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 10/10/2000 02:54 PM
To: Allison McHenry/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Omnibus

The omnibus swap below, plus this Annex A make up the "omnibus" confirm.

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 02:52 PM -----

	Larry Joe Hunter
	10/09/2000 05:26 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Omnibus

Tana,

Here's a Draft I had in my personal file.  I thought this would be easier
than deleting the coding from the system template

Joe


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	MANDATORY Annual Marketing Affiliate Training in conference room 5C2 at 8:30a.m.-9:30a.m.

Date:		10/3/2000
Time:		8:30 AM - 9:30 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000 08:17 AM
---------------------------

Jonathan Hoff
11/06/2000 11:49 AM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 1999 Peakers O&M

Here are the 2000 actuals / estimates for the 1999 peakers (actuals through
September)

and the 2001 O&M budgets for the 1999 Peakers


Chris looked these over and we agreed to just re-send the original
confirmation letter, because the ISO may make cuts again - in fact, the
revised confirm is no longer correct. I put a comment in the deal instructing
no revised confirms to be sent, per Chris Foster.

Also, Chris noticed that the counterparty contact name in the letters was
incorrect. The new contact at ARCO is Alicia Izarraraz. Her number is (562)
499-3234. I hope this helps.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/24/2001 01:00 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: more on #500966

This is the original confirmation letter we sent out.

Unfortunately, before I found out anything about all this, I sent out a
revised confirmation when the deal was changed and went into a pending
status.  This is the revised confirmation letter that went out.

These are the only two that have been sent to the counterparty.  I have put a
note into the TAGG system that should let us know not to send another revised
confirmation.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks for the phone list.  Kimberly Hundl is soooo jealous!


I think that the "general policies" route is the right (and only) one -
particularly for the vast number of reference entities envisaged.  From a
legal sign off perspective, we should be able to give the immediate all
clear, provided
in the case of a ref entity, that it is not an existing customer/counterparty
of Enron (if it is we'll need to check confidentiality agreements etc).
We'll need to work out the quickest way of establishing this (but it is not
per se a legal task)
in the case of a ref entity, that we have carried out the necessary the legal
due diligence in its country of establishment/location
in the case of a counterparty, that we have carried out the necessary legal
due diligence in its country of establishment/location

Of course our legal due diligence may require us to take additional steps in
the case of some countries/counterparties, but we will address these steps as
generically as possible.

Hope this gives a sense of where we're coming from.  Please call me to
discuss further if need be.

Paul

Tomas Valnek
22/05/2000 10:44
To: Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
ECT London Credit Trading

Subject: Re: Credit Trading - Approval Form

I agree that the current Word document approval form will not be very
practical once we scale up. Going forward, we could be looking at some kind
of database solution as implemented for EnronOnline.

TV

Bryan Seyfried
20/05/2000 13:09
To: Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
ECT London Credit Trading

Subject: Re: Credit Trading - Approval Form

Although this makes a lot of sense, how are going to implement it?  We plan
to scale massively and I cannot imagine that this will be efficient enough to
facilitate the time frames and number of reference credits that we are
anticipating.  I think that we need to have a general policy that we can look
to instead of approving them on a one off basis.

Let's discuss

Tomas Valnek
19/05/2000 11:42
To: ECT London Credit Trading, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Credit Trading - Approval Form

Attached is an Approval Form that will have to be completed to request if we
want to trade with a new counterparty or on a new reference credit. I have
incorporated comments from Origination, Credit and Legal. But should you have
any further comments please let me know ASAP, as I plan to introduce this
form by the middle of next week. (Note that there will be two forms, one for
bankruptcy swaps and one for other credit derivatives.)

Regards

Tomas


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Bachman, Paul" <Paul.Bachman@gs.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:54 AM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	J Aron swap outs.

Dutch,

Pursuant to our conversation.

This is the risk we would like to swap out.
This is from your view......meaning if the position is positive ENRON is
LONG to JARON.  JARON would need to buy from ENRON to flatten out.

Cal 3      (572)
Cal 4      1921
Cal 5       655
Cal 6    (1002)
Cal 7      (454)
Cal 8         96

I would prefer to Buy from Enron if you cannot find spreads.

Thanks,

Paul Bachman
VP Energy Trading
Goldman Sachs
(212) 902-3316


Great.  Thanks for all your help on this.

	Peter Keohane
	03/15/2001 02:45 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Kern River Capacity

FYI, Petro-Canada and Hunt Canada signed and submitted.
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 03/15/2001 01:43
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           03/15/2001 10:52 AM

To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Kern River Capacity

Many thanks. Trying to get Petro-Canada and Hunt Oil Canada to sign before
the deadline. Peter.


SALARIES, SALARIES, SALARIES!!!   Everyone is having problems.
Unfortunately, many of
you are new to your jobs and did not inherit paperwork to know what your
staff's salary is.  I have the average
salary for each of the different staffing levels.  I have asked the HR
department to also give me
the low and the high.  Let's face it - your staff today and their salary most
likely are not what
they are going to be next year!  To much movement of people.  So using
estimates and averages
will probably be as accurate as using current salary levels.

Here's what you can do:

1) Make a list of your staff just their positions.
2) Then put down if you think I should budget high, mid, average, low, low to
average, etc.
 You can guess at this based on their experience, length of time in that
position, etc.
3) Then I will calculate out an estimated salary to use for your budget.
4) Here is the average:

 Sr. $4,961
 Spec $3,964
 Staff $3,026
 Sr. Clrk $2,548
 Clerk $2,264
 Asst $3,162

Your list would look something like this:

 Assistant Average
 Clerk  Very High
 Sr. Clerk Low
 Specialist Low to Average
 Specialist Average
 Sr. Specialist Average to High
 Analyst  (They are all allocated at the same amount)

You can , however, use the exact amounts if you have them.  It's up to you.

Next Item - TRAINING!!!

Here's what you can do:

1) List your staff and the type of class they need
2) If you don't know the exact class you want to send them to, then list what
type
 of class - for example personal enrichment (i.e. Time Management) or
 Technical (Derivatives or Applied Finance or Wellhead to Burnertip)
3) The personal enrichment classes cost aroung $500-$700
4) The technical classes cost aroung $800 - $1000.
5) Just list the type of class, and I'll do the rest.

Next Item - Headhunters!

Try 20% of the new hires salary for their fees.

Other Stuff - I have made a list of all of the unusual items we do during the
year that
people forget about at budget time (i.e. flowers for secretaries day, birthday
ice cream, offsite meeting costs, customer gifts).  If you forget these
items, I will
make sure it is added to your budget.

Once I put all of your budget information into the spreadsheets, we will
review them
so that they can be adjusted as necessary and you can approve them.Hopefully
this helps you some.

Diane x-37059


FYI:  Brent will be on vacation this Thursday and Friday, March 15th and
16th.


Brent had to leave early to pick up one or both of his cars from the dealer.


So, I take it your having a bad day.  Don't let him stress you out.  Is there
anything I can do to help?  I'm headed downstairs to buy stamps later.   Let
me know if you want anything from downstairs.

No one's asked the questions I was expecting.  I think Anne was too drunk to
remember asking.  I'm sure it'll come back up eventually.

Are you still planning to go work out at lunch?

Hope everything gets better.
Robin


Hey, why don't we just plan on next Tues or Thurs. and between now and then, I'll try to get a hold of him, OK???
However, if you are free Thursday eve. call me and just you and I can meet somewhere.
Does that sound good?
Debbe.

----- Original Message -----
From: Lucci, Paul T.
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:23 AM
To: Deborah Herbertson
Subject: RE: Hi!

No, that is the email address I have.  That's what I mean I have been unable to reach him.  Here are his phone numbers from his card but I don't know if they work either.

Tim Harbert
(303) 753-8699
(303) 898-9470 Cell

Good Luck
Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Deborah Herbertson [mailto:felinewoman@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:37 PM
To: Lucci, Paul T.
Subject: Re: Hi!

Tried this address.....for Tim......is this a joke???? Just wondering????
Debbe.

----- Original Message -----
From: Lucci, Paul T.
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 4:11 PM
To: Deborah Herbertson
Subject: RE: Hi!

Saturday doesn't work for me.  Email Tim at www.discovery@cmconline.com <http://www.discovery@cmconline.com/>.  I think I'm free Thursday night but I may be taking a customer to dinner.  What does Friday night look like?

-----Original Message-----
From: Deborah Herbertson [mailto:felinewoman@msn.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 3:42 PM
To: Lucci, Paul T.
Subject: Re: Hi!

I have been in a new position (orientation) for the past 4 weeks, and been VERY busy myself.  How about Thursday or Saturday. The only days Carolyn can't would be Wed.'s
 I think we should all meet somewhere for drinks and go from there. Please e-mail Tim, and also give me his address for Carolyn.
Let me know what you think so I can at least alert Carolyn as well.
Debbe.

----- Original Message -----
From: Lucci, Paul T.
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 8:21 AM
To: Deborah Herbertson
Subject: RE: Hi!

Hey what are you guys doing partying without me.  Yes I have been traveling, in fact I have been gone almost all October, up through the 15th.  But I'm finished.   When are you thinking of getting together?

-----Original Message-----
From: Deborah Herbertson [mailto:felinewoman@msn.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 5:41 PM
To: plucci@enron.com
Subject: Hi!

Hi Paul,

Ran into "Tim" at Sambuca's Friday night, and he was wondering what happened to our "get together" we were supposed to have several weeks ago????
I told him I hadn't heard back from you, therefore assumed you were not interested. He said he thought you were out of town a great deal, but was going to e-mail you because he wants possibly to set something up with us four. (Myself, Carolyn and you two)
No problem if you are too busy, believe me I understand.........or whatever the reason might be.

Take care,
Debbe.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Kim:

This would be a good meeting for you to attend.  Please call Darla and find
out if and where the meeting will be.

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001
02:06 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  CoganJA@aol.com                           01/04/2001 01:55 PM

To: Darla.Saucier@enron.com
cc: cfoster@enron.com, cwlipke@czn.com
Subject: Citizens Arizona Gas Invoicing

Darla,

I have completed reviewing your invoice revisions for October and November
1999 and January, February, June and July 2000.  I have found a couple of
discrepancies in the worksheets that you sent on December 22, 1999.  Those
discrepancies are as follows:

1) October 1999 - Transwestern - Commodity sale/purchase cost and pipeline
transportation cost do not equal the total Transwestern cost.  This is do to
not using the rounding option in the detail computations.  While this
difference is only $0.01, the spreadsheet should total correctly.

2) January 2000 - EPNG - Total transportation cost was not equal to sum of
details.  Use of rounding option corrects the discrepancy.

3) July 2000 - Transwestern - Transportation commodity charges were based
upon a volume of 153,272.  The net usage after deducting 3rd party deliveries
of 5,187 from measured city gate throughput of 160,650 is 155,463.  Net usage
should have used in calculating transportation commodity charges.

Attached are revised Enron worksheets for the above stated months that have
been modified to reflect these changes.

In an attempt to close the book on invoicing and payment issues, I have
extended Enron's "Citizens Revisions" worksheet to cover the period November
1998 through July 2000, file attached.  The data presented for the months
January through July 2000, were taken from Citizens' records.  I request that
you verify the accuracy of that data with Enron's records and advise me of
any discrepancies. It should be noted that all corrections that you made plus
the one stated above are reflected in the worksheet.

I will be in Houston next week and would like to meet with you to bring
closure to these invoicing issues.  I am scheduled to meet with Frank Vickers
and other Enron folks at 10 AM on Wednesday, January 10, 2001.  I have a
flight to return to New Orleans at 4:30 PM.  My morning meeting with Enron
should conclude by noon.  Please check your schedule and see if there is time
either before 10 AM or after noon, that you can meet with me.  I am willing
to meet before and after my morning meeting, if necessary.

Please advise on your availability to meet and should you have any questions,
please let me know.  Thanks for your assistance.

Best regards,

John A. Cogan

Johnco Group
3629 Lake Kristin Drive
Gretna, LA 70056
Phone  (504) 392-7557
Cell      (504) 491-2874
Fax      (208) 730-4713

 - ActEnron99OctRevP37.ZIP


Group,

When doing an import or an export from California there are a few important
guidelines to remember.

IMPORT-This must be FIRM.  A firm import is required so that we provide the
spinning reserves to California (we do this by buying firm energy for the
import).  If the import is non-firm, California will charge us their price
for spinning reserve margins.  This could easily be $400 per mw come this
summer.

EXPORT-This must be NON-FIRM.  A non-firm export allows us to provide
spinning reserves to our bilat trading partners (or to simply sell the energy
without spinning reserves as "non-firm"), and NOT have to pay the California
price for spinning reserve margins.  Conversely if we do a firm export, we
would have to pay for California to supply spinning reserves.  And because
California will sometime use actual purchased energy for spinning reserves,
this could easily be $400 per mw this summer.
California has also proposed cutting firm exports this summer, so a "firm"
export does not imply that the energy would actually be exported anymore than
nonfirm.

IF you have other questions.  Please let me know.

Thanks,
Bill


www.dagger.com.... and look at the Products, Recreational Kayaks section.

I am selling my Bayou II kayak by Dagger.  It is a two person, enclosed
style, kayak perfect for enjoyable kayaking with a special friend or family
member.  Especially good for fishing because one person can paddle and
position the boat while the other fishes.  Fast and extremely quiet!!!

$749 Retail(camo $50 extra), will sell for $ 550
2 person, tandem
polyethylene outer layer
camoflage color
wide cockpit and very stable
bow seat slides and locks for single person use
padded seats with adjustable back rests
bow deck rigging with recessed fittings
carry toggles(handles)
includes bow and stern inflatable flotation inserts
weighs 65 lbs
13 ' 6 " long
Max Load 450 lbs.


Spring is in bloom at Barrie Pace!  From sophisticated suits to
comfortable knits, our new catalog has everything you'll need to make
this spring your most fashionable ever.
http://link.ixs1.net/s/lt?id=e30665&si=r39146906&pc=71&ei=c13840

Dress up the season with our brand new collections of quality apparel
and accessories from Austin Reed and Tailleur Platinum.  And
rediscover your favorite timeless fashions that have been updated to
reflect the season's latest styles and colors.
* Austin Reed
  http://link.ixs1.net/s/lt?id=530666&si=r39146906&pc=h2&ei=c13840
* Tailleur Platinum
  http://link.ixs1.net/s/lt?id=f30667&si=r39146906&pc=83&ei=c13840
* Shop by Catalog
  http://link.ixs1.net/s/lt?id=g30669&si=r39146906&pc=i4&ei=c13840

SAVE 20% to 60%!  A wonderful selection of merchandise in the Sale
Outlet!  Treat yourself to these exceptional values on original
designs.
* Sale Outlet
  http://link.ixs1.net/s/lt?id=630668&si=r39146906&pc=95&ei=c13840

Forward this Email to a Friend:
If you know someone who would enjoy filling her wardrobe with new
spring fashions, send her this latest news from Barrie Pace.

P.S. Look for our new catalog in your mailbox this week!

You have received this offer because you registered with Barrie Pace.
You will continue to receive these mailings unless you unsubscribe
using the unsubscibe link below.  If you would prefer not to receive
e-mail updates about special offers, product information and other
news events, please click on the unsubscribe link below.

http://link.ixs1.net/s/link/unsub?rc=ue&rti=c13840&si=r39146906

Barrie Pace
One Executive Way
Forrester Center, WV 25438
LauraMiller@barriepace.com
1-800-441-6011


---------------------- Forwarded by Larry May/Corp/Enron on 09/14/2000 03:21
PM ---------------------------

Ina Rangel@ECT
09/13/2000 05:47 PM
To: Jaime Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gabriela Cantu/NA/Enron@Enron, Alejandro
Montemayor/NA/Enron@ENRON, Agustin Perez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Per
Sekse/NY/ECT@ECT, Mckenzie Senigal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry May/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Tim McKone/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: New Reports from PIRA

---------------------- Forwarded by Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT on 09/13/2000 05:46 PM
---------------------------

"PIRA Energy Group" <Information@pira.com> on 09/13/2000 01:16:01 PM
To: "PIRA Energy Retainer Client" <sande@pira.com>
cc:
Subject: New Reports from PIRA

To PIRA's Retainer Service Clients,
Attached are two strategic reports on the telecom industry that address the
burgeoning market for bandwidth and the implications for the energy
industry.
The first report, "BROADBAND OR DEADBAND: An Appraisal of the Fledgling
Bandwidth Commodity Market," focuses on trading in the wholesale broadband
market.  To assist readers in navigating this report (as well as the second
report) a short glossary of terms can be found in its Appendix.
The second report, "THE DASH FOR CASH: Lucrative Opportunities to Provide
High-Speed Internet Access," focuses on the means by which consumers will
access this communications capacity and some strategic opportunities for
energy companies.
We hope you find these reports useful and strategically provocative.  After
investing great effort in becoming conversant in this area, it is clear to
us at PIRA that the energy marketplace will be forever changed by the demand
for, and creation of, substantial broadband.  What is NOT clear to us at
this time is how we can best assist our clients that are looking to
participate in these developments.  In light of that, we ask that you take a
moment to complete the brief survey that is also attached to this email.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Dr. Gary N. Ross
Chief Executive Officer

 - Broadband or Deadband.doc
 - Dash for Cash.doc
 - Survey.doc


We have been informed that all swaps must be submitted by next Friday in
Raptor 1 (9/22).  All your help in meeting this deadline will be greatly
appreciated!  If you have not been able to respond to any prior requests for
information, please do so by Monday.  Thanks.

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


why don't we wait and share our revised policies with them?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Rick
Sent:	Monday, July 09, 2001 2:37 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Cc:	Lighthill, Sandra
Subject:	McKinsey & Co. HR Policies

Michelle, we have received McKinseys version of HR Policy that is communicated to employees, they have asked if we woyuld supply them with a copy of our HR Policy handbook.  Are we clear to share our current intranet posted HR policies?  Regards, Rj.


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fromer, Howard
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:19 PM
To:	Sullivan, Kathleen; Montovano, Steve; Ferris, Frank; Bachmeier, Rick; Fruge, Dwight; Kingerski, Harry; Floris, Vinio; Zdunkewicz, Richard L.; Nieland, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: Central Hudson Joint Settlement Approved

Kathleen: Congratulations. You did a great job protecting and even increasing the value of our IBM position. Howard

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sullivan, Kathleen
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:50 PM
To:	Fromer, Howard; Montovano, Steve; Ferris, Frank; Bachmeier, Rick; Fruge, Dwight; Kingerski, Harry; Floris, Vinio; Zdunkewicz, Richard L.; Nieland, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Central Hudson Joint Settlement Approved

Good news on a dismal day... The New York State Public Service Commission today voted
to approve the joint settlement in the Central Hudson Rate Case.  See the attached press release.  Please contact me with any questions.

 << File: CH Press Release.pdf >>
Kathleen A. Sullivan
Manager, Regulatory and Government Affairs
ENRON
713.345.7304 direct
713.306.8498 cell
kathleen.sullivan@enron.com


ASME International Capitol Update
January 4, 2002

1.	Appropriation Bills Wrapped Up
	--Energy and NASA FY2002 Appropriated Budgets Detailed

2.	Math and Science Partnerships at Department of Education and NSF
	--Agencies to Work Together to Strengthen Math and Science Education

3.	GAO Begins New Investigation into Federal Office of Pipeline Safety
	--Dingell Request to Investigate Resource and Personnel Needs at OPS

4.	Bush Nominates Director for Department of Energy Office of Science
	--Raymond Orbach, Chancellor at UC Riverside, is Named

*****************************

APPROPRIATION BILLS WRAPPED UP

When President Bush issued his proposed fiscal year 2002 budget to Congress last April, investment in research and development was not a top priority in most federal agencies.  Eight months and a major terrorist attack later, Congress and the President agreed to put aside their disagreements over funding levels for most federal programs until another day.

Here is a brief summary of how energy and space research programs fared in the recent appropriations cycle.  Information on funding for research programs at the National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the Department of Defense will appear in Update next week.

Energy

Funding for energy research and development programs are divided between two appropriations bills - Energy & Water and Interior.  The Energy Committee of ASME's Council on Engineering submitted testimony last spring on the energy programs contained in both bills.  Copies of the testimony are available at:  http://www.asme.org/gric/ps/2001/01-21.html
and http://www.asme.org/gric/ps/2001/01-22.html

The Interior bill provides funding for fossil energy and energy conservation R&D programs.  In its testimony to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, the COE Energy Committee recommended several key areas that it believed merited increases above the President's request.

In all of those areas - carbon sequestration, advanced gas turbines, and fuel cell research - Congress ultimately supported the ASME Committee's recommendations.  For carbon sequestration, the President had requested $20.6 million, the ASME Committee had recommended $29.6 million, and Congress ultimately appropriated $32.1 million.  The President had proposed eliminating the advanced gas turbine program; the Committee had recommended that funding be restored to a level of $30 million, $1.1 million more than in FY 2001.  Congress decided on a level of $18.5 million.  For fuel cell research, the administration had proposed $45.1 million, a reduction of $7.2 million from the FY01 level.  The ASME Energy Committee had recommended $61.1 million, and Congress appropriated $58.1, which was higher than either the House or the Senate had recommended in their individual bills.

In the Energy & Water appropriations bill, renewable energy research funding was set at $396 million which, while $40 million less than the Senate bill, was $20 million above the House-passed number, $120 million above the President's request, and $21 million above current levels.

Nuclear Energy Research received $250.5 million, which is $27 million more than the President's request, but $9 million less than current levels.  The Nuclear Energy Research Initiative received $32 million, which is $19.2 million more than the President requested, $15 million more than the House version, but $6 million less than the Senate recommended and $3 million less than the ASME Energy Committee recommendation.  The Nuclear Energy Plant Optimization Program received $7 million, which is $2 million more than the President's request, the House bill, and current levels, but $2 million less than the Senate bill, and $3 million less than the Energy Committee recommended.

DOE science programs were funded at $3.2 billion, an increase of $73.2 million over the budget request and $52.7 million above fiscal year 2001.  High energy physics was funded at the request level of $716.1 million.  Nuclear physics also was funded at the request level of $360.5 million.  Biological and environmental research received $527.4 million, an increase of $84.4 million over the request. Funding for basic energy sciences was set at $1 billion, a decrease of $1 million from the request, although that total includes full funding for the Spallation Neutron Source.  The Advanced Scientific Computing Research Initiative was allocated $158 million, a decrease of $5 million from the request.  Finally, fusion energy research was funded at $248.5 million, the same as the request and the COE Energy Committee recommendation.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

Funding for NASA's R&D programs is included in the VA-HUD and Independent Agencies appropriations bill.  National Science Foundation programs also are included in that bill.  ASME's Inter-Council Committee on Federal R&D has task forces that prepared testimony on both NASA's and NSF's budget requests.   Copies of the testimony can be found at:  http://www.asme.org/gric/ps/2001/01-11.html
and http://www.asme.org/gric/ps/2001/01-23.html

Overall, NASA received $10.2 billion for its research programs, which is $343 million, or 3.5 percent, more than it received in FY01.  Of that amount, $1.72 billion is allocated for the International Space Station, which is a $440 million, or 15.2 percent reduction from last year.  Congress is increasingly concerned about cost overruns on the station, and has been highly critical of NASA's management of the project.  Among programs receiving substantial increases were Aero-Space Technology, which received a 12.4 percent ($275 million) increase, for a total of $2.49 billion; and Space Science, which received $2.84 billion, $224 million, or 8.5 percent, more than last year.

MATH AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIPS AT DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND NSF

When President Bush announced his education plan last February, he proposed a Math and Science Partnership Initiative at the National Science Foundation, emphasizing a need for better science and mathematics education across the country.  Possible partners for the Math and Science Partnerships could include the State Education Agency, a math, science, or engineering department of an institution of higher education, a high need Local Education Agency, businesses, and nonprofit and for-profit groups of demonstrated effectiveness.

The House and Senate Education Committees, when drafting their education legislation, also thought the Math and Science Partnership program was needed, but placed the program at the Department of Education.  In the end, now that the authorization and appropriation process is complete, there are programs at both NSF and Department of Education.  The two agencies are in fact forming a task force to address the issue.

The FY 2002 Labor-HHS-Education appropriations conferees only appropriated $12.5 million for the newly-established Math and Science Partnerships at the Department of Education, which were authorized at $450 million in the recently approved Elementary and Secondary Education Authorization Act.  However, the FY 2002 VA/HUD appropriations bill, provided another $160 million for similar partnerships to be awarded by NSF.

In addition, the Labor-HHS-Education conferees encouraged states to continue making science and math instruction a high priority by also using other federal funds available for teacher improvement.  A total of $2.85 billion was appropriated for overall Teacher Quality.

For more information, please contact Patti Burgio at burgiop@asme.org.

GAO BEGINS NEW INVESTIGATION INTO FEDERAL OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY

In response to a request by Representative John Dingell, ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, the General Accounting Office has begun another investigation into the Department of Transportation's Office of Pipeline Safety, specifically focusing on OPS's approach to preventing terrorist attacks like those of September 11, and whether the OPS has sufficient resources and personnel to deal with such events.

On October 3, GAO released an investigative report on OPS that said the agency had made progress, but still had the lowest rating of any transportation agency in implementing National Transportation Safety Board recommendations.

For more information, contact Francis Dietz at dietzf@asme.org.

BUSH NOMINATES ORBACH TO HEAD DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF SCIENCE

President Bush has announced his intention to nominate Raymond Orbach to be Director of the Department of Energy's Office of Science.  The Chancellor of the University of California Riverside since 1992, Orbach served for ten years as Provost of UCLA's College of Letters and Science.   He has also served on numerous professional, scientific, and civic boards, as well as held visiting professorships at institutions in several countries, including Tel Aviv University, the Imperial College of Science and Technology in London, and the Ecole Superieure de Physique et Chimie Industrielle de la Ville De Paris.

DOE's Office of Science is responsible for the department's civilian research in high energy and nuclear physics, fusion energy sciences, basic energy sciences, biological and environmental research and computational science, and ten DOE civilian laboratories.

For more information, contact Francis Dietz at dietzf@asme.org.

*****************************
Melissa R. Murray
Manager, State Government Relations
ASME International
1828 L Street, NW, Suite 906
Washington, DC  20036
Phone:  202.785.7380
Fax:  202.429.9417
Email:  murraym@asme.org

--------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to ASME's capitol-news list as: rick.buy@enron.com
To change your personal information, or email address please click on the link below:
https://www.asmeny.org/memberaddr/html/security.htm

To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-capitol-news-442645A@list.asme.org
or click here: http://www.asmeny.org/cgi-bin1/WEB400CE?166082+ANT007+N+99999
--------------------------------


this is the memo I was referring to -

---------------------- Forwarded by Brent A Price/HOU/ECT on 21/06/2000 17:02
---------------------------

Richard Sage
21/06/2000 13:38
To: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: For Discussion: Implementing Definition of Trading Office

i.e. very draft!
What are your thoughts?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Sage/LON/ECT on 21/06/2000 13:40
---------------------------

Richard Sage
21/06/2000 07:35
To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Naomi
Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Phil Redman/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: For Discussion: Implementing Definition of Trading Office

I was going to write that the buying and selling of physical commodity
locally was OK, but that hedging had to be done with Regional Hub. The
problem with this model is that it describes Helsinki before the bust!

Another possiblity is the agency model, where the local trader acts under the
direction of the hub trader. This is where Helsinki currently is (although we
also have an independent manager on site). However, I am not so happy with
this, and Rick Causey certainly does not like it. Perhaps we should recommend
independent Risk Managers in every office, but all correspondence and
settlement with regional hub?


Greetings, MIT Recruiting Team!

Each of you has been chosen to represent Enron for our Fall 2000 recruiting
efforts at MIT University.  As part of the team, you will be challenged with
choosing the best candidates from Sloan's Graduate School to join our
Associate Program.

Our first campus event will be on September 21 and interviews will be held on
campus November 7 and 8.  I hope you are all able to participate in the
exciting process of recruiting young talent.

We will be more formally organising ourselves in the next couple of weeks.
Currently, we are planning to have a brief team meeting in order to make
introductions, inform you about the Associate Program, and discuss the fall
recruiting calendar.  To that end, please contact me with any questions or
comments you may have.

The team meeting date is set for September 1st at 10am in room 11C2.

Please RSVP to me as soon as possible.

I look forward to meeting you all soon.

Sincerely,

Kristin Gandy
Associate Recruiter
x 53214


Please see following details for Thursday's operational risk meeting:

Date: Thursday, January 11, 2001
Time: 1:00 - 4:00 PM
Place: Hyatt Regency Hotel
 "Regency" Room (up escalators to 2nd floor, next to gift shop)
Subject: Operational Risk
Attendees: All Energy Operations Managers and above (ENA, EIM, EGM)

Please note: If you are unable to attend for any reason, please contact Sally
at ext. 35926.

Thanks,
Patti x39106


Maria and Steve:

Attached are blacklines of the two forwards.  Sorry for the delay.  I'll call
Clint and we'll try to call.  Sara


April, I'll be in Colorado until March 10.  We can schedule next week or you
can talk to him directly.  Currently, EBS research is helping Kevin Howard
and Scott Yeager (indirectly via Kevin) in their effort to assess the value
of an eyeball.  Paulo's research will complement this effort.  The research
that Paulo will perform for you will be part of a bigger picture work that
Kevin Howard has aked Stinson and I to support.    You can call me on my cell
713-516-5440 while I am in CO.

Regards,

Ravi.

	April Hodgson
	03/02/00 07:13 PM

		 To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
		 cc: Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Project brainstorming for Paulo
I will be in my office Friday and next Tuesday.  Other than that I will be
traveling so please call me on one of those days and we can discuss this
further.  I was in Houston this week and will be back in Houston 3/14 -
3/16.  Let me know what works for you.

Regards

	Stinson Gibner@ECT
	03/02/00 10:03 AM

		 To: April Hodgson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Project brainstorming for Paulo

April:

Paulo is the MIT Ph.D. student who talked with you by phone a couple of weeks
ago.   He is interested in trying to better define what type of project he
might do over the summer with EBS.   Recall that he is interested in the
psychological/customer behavior issues related to web commerce as compared to
traditional commerce.   Perhaps the easiest way to proceed would be for you,
me, Ravi, and Vince to get together to discuss possibilities.   We could then
include Paulo by phone to get his initial reactions/suggestions.   After an
initial assessment, we could then plan on another visit for Paulo.

Please let me know what your schedule would allow.

thanks,
--Stinson

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2000
08:55 AM ---------------------------

Paulo Rocha e Oliveira <paulo@MIT.EDU> on 02/28/2000 12:19:18 PM
To: <Stinson.Gibner@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Next meeting

Stinson -

Thanks for your reply.  I just got a call from someone at Enron today about
Summer employment, so I think a meeting with April and your group would be
very appropriate at this time.

I am available to meet with April  any day this coming month, except March
9, March 10, and March 17-30.

Please let me know what works for you.

Thanks again,

Paulo


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001
08:42 AM ---------------------------

"Chris Strickland" <chris@lacimagroup.com> on 03/13/2001 12:48:39 AM
Please respond to "Chris Strickland" <chris@lacimagroup.com>
To: "VinceJKaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>, "Vince \(home\)"
<VKaminski@aol.com>
cc:
Subject: EPRM article

Hi Vince,
?
As always, it was good to see you again in Houston  - we all enjoyed the meal
very much, the restaurant was a good  choice.
?
It's that time again I'm afraid. Can you pls cast  your eye over the
attached?and, if at all possible, get back to me in the  next few days - I
have to deliver something to London by Friday.
?
How's the course going at Rice? Not too much work I  hope.
?
Best regards.
?
Chris.
?
 - EPRM_09_fwd_vol_estimation.doc


Mark -- Sorry for the rush on this.  Could you provide legal approval of this
click through demo of EnronOnline.  It's the most comprehensive discussion of
the functionality of our website.  The text you'll see will accompany various
screen shots.
The demo will be accessible through the web site.

Thanks

Kal Shah
x 39354


Its good we didn't book anything because CES just sold a lot of their
customers to another company.

	From:  Steve Jackson                           05/05/2000 08:29 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES Retail Index Positions

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT on 05/05/2000 08:27
AM ---------------------------

Scott Neal
05/04/2000 05:32 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CES Retail Index Positions

I definatley think we should book these volumes for all of your reasons below
plus each month we don't seem to have a decent estimate until the 30th or
31st.

	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           04/28/2000 08:41 AM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES Retail Index Positions

Scott--
Here is your problem in getting these booked.  You can do what you want, but
I still think we should book it.  The flexibility in takes is only 10% so
your flash to actual will not be that great--certainly less than if you don't
book anything.  Plus, at least if we book something it will be easier to tell
if they do not take the volumes they are supposed to.  In addition, per our
discussion with Retail--which Dick was in on that meeting--it is unlikely
that the sale of the CES-Retail business would occur before September or
October, which in my mind means it may not be til the end of the year.  This
would pretty much get us to the end of the deal term.  And finally, what if
Chris and/or Dick is gone at some point in time--we need the volume info in
there.

Obviously it is just my recommendation to book it---you can do what you
want.

---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000
08:33 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Steve Jackson                           04/27/2000 04:03 PM

To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CES Retail Index Positions

FYI,

I talked to Chris and Dick about the issue that the CES index positions are
not reflected in the books.  Chris was concerned about what (firm) volume to
book since there is flexibility in the takes.  Also, he said he has a strong
feeling that CES-Retail may go away in the near future so why book it.  Dick
agreed that maybe we should not book anything on this right now.  So Chris
said he will look into this issue early next week and get with me.


That meeting was about my 13th of the day that began at 7:30, and that was
day three of the week with that kind of scheduling.  I apologize if I seemed
impatient in the meeting.  I know that you are working for the best interests
of Energy Operations and  Enron.  By the end of the day I was probably
looking for crisp, clear solutions to an issue that probably doesn't lend
itself well to that.

Why don't we set up a lunch so that you and I can have the opportunity to
talk separate from immediate issues at hand?  I will have Patti get a date on
the calendar.  --Sally

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Hector McLoughlin                           06/02/2000 03:21 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Yesterday's meeting

Dear Sally,
I should have and I could have made a better job of trying to sell my idea at
yesterday's meeting.   I'll be the first one to admit that all of my
suggestions are not always the best alternative but,   I hope that you
believe that I do have your best interests and Enron's best interests in mind
every time that I make a suggestion.
I hope to earn your trust as we continue to work together.
Sincerely, hgm


Thank you for booking your travel with Continental Airlines.
Below is a copy of your flight information. Please refer to your
complete online itinerary for the respective details on your hotel
and car reservations.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

FLIGHT SUMMARY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Purchased
Itinerary Number: 1233872297
Round Trip
Booking ID: 25I9AA
1 adult USD 243.71
Taxes: USD 37.28

Total Cost: USD 280.99

Flight: from Houston, TX (IAH-Bush Intercontinental) to Syracuse, NY
(SYR-Hancock Intl.)
Depart: 28-Sep-00 at  4:00 PM
Arrive: 28-Sep-00 at 10:13 PM

Depart: Houston (IAH), 28-Sep-00 at  4:00 PM
Arrive: Detroit (DTW), 28-Sep-00 at  7:58 PM
Flight: Continental 6836, OPERATED BY NORTHWEST AIR -- NW1836
Aircraft:  Airbus A319
Meal Service: Dinner
Duration: 2hr 58mn
Distance: 1096 mi
Economy/Coach Class

Depart: Detroit (DTW), 28-Sep-00 at  8:55 PM
Arrive: Syracuse (SYR), 28-Sep-00 at 10:13 PM
Flight: Continental 6560, OPERATED BY NORTHWEST AIR -- NW1560
Aircraft:  Boeing DC9-50
Meal Service: n/a
Duration: 1hr 18mn
Distance: 363 mi
Economy/Coach Class

Flight: from Syracuse, NY (SYR-Hancock Intl.) to Houston, TX (IAH-Bush
Intercontinental)
Depart:  1-Oct-00 at  5:00 PM
Arrive:  1-Oct-00 at  9:25 PM

Depart: Syracuse (SYR),  1-Oct-00 at  5:00 PM
Arrive: Cleveland (CLE),  1-Oct-00 at  6:45 PM
Flight: Continental 3185, OPERATED BY CONTINENTAL EXPRESS
Aircraft:  ATR 72
Meal Service: n/a
Duration: 1hr 45mn
Distance: 317 mi
Economy/Coach Class

Depart: Cleveland (CLE),  1-Oct-00 at  7:35 PM
Arrive: Houston (IAH),  1-Oct-00 at  9:25 PM
Flight: Continental 1985
Aircraft:  Boeing 737-300
Meal Service: Snack
Duration: 2hr 50mn
Distance: 1099 mi
Economy/Coach Class

----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have chosen the E-ticket option for your flight(s), a Travel
Itinerary and Receipt will be delivered within 3 - 5 days via U.S.
mail. If you have specified an alternate delivery location for your
E-ticket, we will send a Travel Itinerary and Receipt to the address
you specified, plus a Payment Receipt to the address that appears on
your credit card statement.

When you arrive at the airport on the day of your flight please
provide the ticket agent with your last name, flight number and photo
identification to receive your boarding pass(es).  For curbside check-in,
present your passenger receipt or a printout of this message and photo
ID.

E-Ticket customers can also use one of our automated eService Centers
or ESC. Our ESCs allow customers to check-in and receive a boarding
pass for all Continental U.S. domestic flights.  ESCs are conveniently
located near the ticket counter and gate areas in most of our U.S.
cities.  Baggage check is available at those ESCs located at the
ticket counter.

If E-Tickets are not available for your flight(s), or you have
elected to receive a paper ticket, we will send your ticket(s) and
receipt(s) to the address you specified during the booking process. If
your date of departure is:

-- within 3 days and E-Ticket is available for your flight(s), an
E-Ticket will be issued.  If E-Ticket is not available, you will
have been prompted online to call Continental Airlines On-Line Reservations
at 1 (888) 815-2665 to arrange
the delivery of your tickets.
-- between 3 and 7 business days from today, by  2nd day or overnight
mail.
-- more than 7 business days from today, by U.S. mail.

Photo identification will be required upon check-in, such as a Driver's
License, Military ID, Passport or an official identification card
issued by a government authority. For questions concerning this
requirement, please contact Continental Airlines or visit our web site at
http://www.continental.com.

A valid passport is required for international travel. Some
countries also have visa and/or health requirements. Please check with
the embassy of the country to which you are traveling, contact
Continental Airlines or visit our web site at http://www.continental.com.

If you wish to change hotel and car reservations, use
Continental Airlines On-Line Reservations at http://www.continental.com. To
change airline flights or for
en-route assistance, call 1 (888) 815-2665. Please have your itinerary
number available for the agent.

We wish you a pleasant trip and look forward to serving you
again soon.

Continental Airlines
http://www.continental.com/


Hello Kate, here are the participant lists for COB, PV, MIDC, 4C,
and MEAD.   Please note that PSCO is under "New Century Energies".  Feel
free to call me up if there is still more questions/concerns.
  Thank you
 Eric

 <<COBpart.doc>>  <<PVpart.doc>>  <<MidCpart.doc>>  <<FourCpart.doc>>
<<Market Place Participants.doc>>

 - COBpart.doc
 - PVpart.doc
 - MidCpart.doc
 - FourCpart.doc
 - Market Place Participants.doc


As you might recall, York filed two summonses against Enron and Eric Holzer in two separate lawsuits' connected with the parties' dealings in the paper market. The two summonses (as allowed by Pennsylvania law) lacked any information about York's claims against Enron or Mr. Holzer. The Enron defendants removed their suits to federal court. Dechert is the Enron defendants' outside counsel.
	We have finally received York's complaint detailing its claims against Enron and Mr. Holzer.  In a nutshell, York claims that Enron hired Holzer away from York in an effort to steal York's customer base and then, contrary to the parties' agreement and custom in the industry, proceeded to steal customers from York. Specifically, York claims that the only reason it let Holzer out of his non-compete agreement with York is because both Holzer and Enron promised: that they would honor the allegedly established practice in the paper industry preventing competitors from usurping each other's client relationships by selling paper directly to each other's clients, and that York would get new business from Enron. It is York's position that Holzer took confidential and proprietary information from York when he left that company, gave this information to Enron and that Enron and Holzer used this information to wrongfully steal York's customers.
	York has alleged causes of action against Enron and Holzer for:
	1.	Theft of trade secrets,
	2.	Breach of contract (several counts),
	3.	Tortuous interference with contractual relations,
	4.	Tortuous interference with prospective contractual relations,
	5.	Fraudulent inducement,
	6.	Unfair competition, and
	7.	Civil conspiracy.
	My initial impression is that York should be more worried about having agreements with its competitors preventing business solicitation then Enron should be worried about a predatory pricing claim; however, I don't know enough about the facts to have a firm view of the case. We are in the process of getting more information about these claims and I'll update you again after we have talked to our folks about this.  In the meantime, please call with any questions or comments.


Please handle.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Dan Salter" <dsalter@hgp-inc.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Dan+20Salter+22+20+3Cdsalter+40hgp-inc+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 3:09 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.; Imai, Rika; Will, Lloyd
Subject:	Project Atom Contract Revision

Attached is a Word file containing a letter outlining the  contract terms and provisions for renewing our contract.  Please  review.  I will call tomorrow, 6/1/01, to see if there are changes you want  to incorporate.

Thanks,
Dan
 - Atom revision 010531.doc << File: Atom revision 010531.doc >>


There is no correction report for 2/7; however, this e-mail was returned to
me last night. Here goes again.....