yes, this is a brokered transaction.  I'm not sure the details of the deal, Joe Parks just wanted me to let you know, I just assumed it was because we paid someone on the wrong price.  Joe, you may want to talk to Rita about this.

Sabra

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wynne, Rita
Sent:	Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:44 AM
To:	Dinari, Sabra L.
Subject:	RE: Mississippi River Transmission - December 2001

Sabra,

Is this a brokered transaction because I don't see any contracts for transport for that pipeline?  Also, is someone expecting for payment to be made as you referenced in your last statement.  We have not made any payments other than ones requested by Commercial and approved by the Cash Committee since Nov. 2001 production.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dinari, Sabra L.
Sent:	Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:40 AM
To:	Wynne, Rita
Cc:	Parks, Joe; Olinger, Kimberly S.
Subject:	Mississippi River Transmission - December 2001

Rita,

We have a path created in Unify that has actuals attached to it for December 4-31, 2001 that need to be zeroed out:

Path ID is 10108728
Track ID is 11112477
Sitara Deal Ticket #941625

The correct path that does show BAV correctly is:

Path ID 24335439
Track ID 11249017
Sitara Deal Ticket #1198556

Please call me if I need to do anything further to help get this paid correctly.

Sabra
X39781


Please refer to the attached spreadsheet.  The gathering meters nominations have been adjusted to the volumes in the Avg column effective 4/9/01.

Bob


===================================
       from Gilder Publishing
         THE FRIDAY LETTER
e-mailed weekly, for friends and subscribers
===================================
            | http://www.gilder.com/ |

Issue 40.0/January 11, 2002

HEADLINES:

* The Week/ A Corporate Crime Wave?
* Friday Feature/ Wesbury Tops List of Forecasters
* Friday Bonus/ Homeland Security
* Storewidth Update
* Poll Question/ The fall of Enron
* Readings
* Subscribe / Unsubscribe Information

 ~~~~~~~~~~
THE WEEK/ A Corporate Crime Wave?
By George Gilder
The Wall Street Journal
January 11, 2002

Crime may have declined in the streets but, by the recent inflammation of
the pundits, you would think there has been an outbreak of corporate
criminality. The Internet, communications, and stock-market booms of the
1990s, it seems, were based on a pervasive series of felonious acts. A
wide array of businesses, from Global Crossing to Loral, from General
Electric to Enron, artfully inflated the worth of their shares through the
creation of Potemkin businesses. If you believe the news coverage,
corporate leaders are racing to despoil, mulct, defraud, poison, pillage,
and ruin their own businesses, their nation's soils and waters, their
retirement funds, and the world economy.

This flood of factitious crimes, this parade of snaffled fat cats and
scapegoats, happens every recession. Rather than ruing economic reverses
as effects of public policy errors and miscalculations, public officials
turn the tables and treat bankruptcy and crash as culpable schemes of
particular white-collar criminals.

Some of these alleged crime lords are familiar. Gary Winnick was party to
a previous potlatch at Drexel Burnham, where he played a key role in
financing the communications infrastructure through MCI,
Telecommunications Inc., Turner broadcasting, and McCaw Cellular. Then he
and his associates were alleged to have ravaged savings and loans by
inducing some of them to buy those companies' high-yield securities before
a government ban briefly destroyed their value. Finally Mr. Winnick boldly
launched the world-wide fiber-optic networks of Global Crossing, with, it
is implied, the intention of bilking investors and crashing bandwidth
prices in what Fortune calls "perhaps the greatest executive ripoff in the
history of enterprise" but what is better described as the most efficient
global buildout in telecom history.

Read the Entire Article at http://www.gilder.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Warren Buffet calls Value Line, "An incredible value! I don't know of
another system that's as good."  Outperforming the DOW by 15 to 1 for over
35-years - we've delivered 15,915% gains for investors in our portfolio of
#1-ranked stocks. Click Below to try this legendary stock-picking system
RISK-FREE for 13-Weeks!

http://www.offeredby.net/hst/vline/1101camp/celeb/bnc.cfm?trkid=20005S13800

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FRIDAY FEATURE/ Wesbury Tops List of Forecasters
From The Wall Street Journal, January 7, 2002:

"Bearish Wesbury Tops List of Forecasters
In a Rough Year for Economic Divination"

"It was a rough year to be an economic forecaster. Few economists
anticipated a full-fledged recession. Fewer still expected the aggressive
response of the Federal Reserve that sent short-term interest rates to
their lowest level in 40 years. Then the Sept. 11 terror attacks occurred,
forcing everyone to revise their forecasts all over again.

"But for a small group of bearish economists, everything seems to have
gone as expected, leading them to the top spots in The Wall Street
Journal's economic-forecasting survey for 2001.

"Atop the pack was Brian Wesbury, chief economist at Griffin, Kubik,
Stephens & Thompson, a Chicago investment bank that specializes in
fixed-income securities. Long before the National Bureau of Economic
Research finally declared last month that the U.S. had fallen into
recession in March, Mr. Wesbury had factored recession into his forecasts.
He called for meager economic growth in the first half of 2001 and then a
contraction by the third quarter. As it turns out, he was right on."

What the Journal forgot to mention, of course, is Brian's other perch --
chief economist of The American Spectator. Brian's columns are everything
we want from the otherwise dismal science: sharp, solidly backed and
infused with the deeper wisdom of the supply side. Brian brings political
wits as well -- he was chief economist for the Joint Economic Committee of
Congress during the epic budget battles with the Clinton White House. And
now he's got a year's worth of bragging rights.

By the way, last year's rampage notwithstanding, Brian for the long-term
is among the biggest bulls around (which is another reason we like him).
In the Journal's 2002 survey, he's one of only five economists -- out of
fifty polled -- to peg the potential long-term U.S. productivity growth at
greater than three percent.

P.S. The Spectator economics crew is having a great season all around. Our
great friend Larry Kudlow of New York's Kudlow & Co. (and now of CNBC's
excellent "America Now," with Wall Street provocateur James J. Cramer)
came in right behind Brian at number five in the Journal's 2001
forecasting derby. See the Spectator Interview with Larry in our April
2001 issue, accessible online at http://www.gilder.com/amspec/
~~~~~~~~~~
Can quantitative analysis help you pick better stocks? Subscribe to Forbes
Growth Investor and find out. Click below to get a free report
https://commerce.cdsfulfillment.com/FMA/subscriptions.cgi?IN_Code=IML01G
~~~~~~~~~~
FRIDAY BONUS/ Homeland Security
The Heritage Foundation Homeland Security Task Force was formed days after
the September 11. Comprised of some of the best homeland security experts
in the world, the Task Force was asked to make specific proposals on how
best to eliminate the vulnerabilities exposed on September 11. The Task
Force was co-chaired by two veteran policymakers regarding terrorism and
homeland security: former Attorney General Edwin Meese III and L. Paul
Bremer, Chairman of the National Commission on Terrorism and
Ambassador-at-Large for Counter-Terrorism under President Ronald Reagan.

The Task Force this week released a comprehensive study entitled
"Defending the American Homeland" that "calls for significant changes in
the way government at all levels -- local, state and national -- works to
counter terrorism." The report also focuses on: Infrastructure Protection
and Internal Security; Civil Defense Against Weapons of Mass Destruction;
Intelligence and Law Enforcement; and, Military Operations to Counter
Terrorism.

The entire 115 page report can be found, free of charge, at Heritage's
website
http://www.heritage.org/homelanddefense/welcome.html
~~~~~~~~~~
STOREWIDTH UPDATE
Storewidth is exploding with terabytes of new content!
Just confirmed, special presentations by
Compaq
Adeptec
MTI
Nortel
Corvis

Just announced:
A Special bonus session with over 25 of the most talked about private
Storewidth companies. VCs are salivating from coast-to-coast.

More new speakers than we can list here. Check it all out at
http://www.storewidth.com/conferences/
 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Gilder.com Poll: Who would you pick as the 2001 person of the year?
Over 50% of you picked George W. Bush

Up Next: The fall of Enron is:
A scandal in the making
Just a business failure

Let us know at http://www.gilder.com/
~~~~~~~~~~
GOING, Going, going, but not yet quite gone...
We still have a limited number of tapes and CDs from our 2001 Conferences
-- Dynamic Silicon Conference, Powercosm 1 and 2, Storewidth, and the
Gilder Technology Research Conference.  Each set has 10 to 12 tapes and
covers three days of conference material. Go to
https://www.gilder.com/tapes and check out the great deals.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
READINGS
Sprint's Next-Gen Showcase
http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/tech/019071.htm

Qualcomm Ships 3G Phones
http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/hottopics/telecomm/056948.htm

Telematics
http://www.siliconstrategies.com/story/OEG20020110S0084

NTT DoCoMo Falling Short of Target
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2102377,00.html

2 Computer Giants Hope to Avoid Pitfalls of Past Mergers
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/01/technology/01HEWL.html

States Ask for No Delay on Microsoft
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/01/technology/01SOFT.html

Qwest Stirs Protest Over Privacy
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/01/technology/01QWES.html

Web Services
http://news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&c=Article&cid=FT3YN1801WC&live=true&tagid=ZZZC00L1B0C&subheading=information%20technology

The Benefits of Being Small
http://news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&c=Article&cid=FT3MMWHV0WC&live=true

EMC's New Battlefront
http://www.forbes.com/2002/01/03/0103storage.html

E-Commerce 2002
http://www.ecommercetimes.com/perl/story/15499.html

Internet Taxes
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1014-201-8354714-0.html?tag=bt_bh

10 Personal Tech Trends
http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/ptech/trend010302.htm

The Next Computer Interface
http://www.latimes.com/technology/custom/techtimes/la-010302cover.story

Tools and Toys
http://www.msnbc.com/news/676223.asp?0si=-

AOL's Hacker Hole
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-8336037.html?tag=mn_hd

Data Analysis Software
http://www.computerworld.com/storyba/0,4125,NAV47_STO66913,00.html

Top 10 Personnel Moves
http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=10582

Optical Chips
http://www.computerworld.com/storyba/0,4125,NAV47_STO67042,00.html

.Net, Coming To A Platform Near You.
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/02/01/09/020109hnmsnet.xml

Fight For the Living Room
http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,49585,00.html

The New iMac
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,49565,00.html

China Goes CDMA
http://www.newsbytes.com/news/02/173456.html
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

FRIDAY LETTER STAFF
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Dortman (ddortman@gilder.com)
John Hammill (jhammill@gilder.com)
Aaron Charlwood (acharlwood@gilder.com)

CONTRIBUTORS THIS WEEK: George Gilder, Mark Ziebarth, John Hammill, Dave
Dortman, Spencer Reiss, Sandy Fleischmann, Aaron Charlwood

ADVERTISING INFORMATION
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Friday Letter is mailed each week to more than 150,000 subscribers and
friends of Gilder Publishing, including industry leaders, financial
professionals and individual investors. For information about advertising,
contact Brian Cole, VP Business Development at bcole@gilder.com,
tel 860-434-0614.

FEEDBACK AND PROBLEMS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Send letters to the editor to Fridayletter@gilder.com

For technical problems, please e-mail Fridayhelp@gilder.com

You can also contact us via:
 Gilder Publishing, Customer Service
 888-484-2727; outside the U.S.1-413-644-2100
 1-413-644-2123 (fax)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

The Friday Letter is published weekly for subscribers and friends of
Gilder Publishing. If someone you know would enjoy it, please feel free to
forward a copy.

To SUBSCRIBE please visit http://www.gilder.com/

Copyright 2002 Gilder Publishing LLC
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

---
You are currently subscribed to gilder-technology-report as: alewis@ect.enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-gilder-technology-report-661837S@earth.lyris.net


The CPUC has commenced, "an investigation of the state's transmission and
electric generation system reliability pursuant to AB 970."? The OII will
also look into, "utility acquisition of new peaking generation reosurces for
Summer 2001 and beyond."? The OII notes that the state currently has a,
"mismatch between supply and demand statewide and in specific geographic
areas."? An appendix to the OII lists various system upgrades which may
require improvements.? The investigation, "will examine the most
cost-effective ways of easing transmission constraints and associated
generation  shortfalls, both in the short term and the longer term."
?
The OII notes the ISO's RFP for 2,00 MW of peaking capacity, complains that
the terms of such deals are to be kept confidential until the contracts are
signed, and concludes that,?"contract terms that offer project proponents
market prices plus full capacity costs appear exorbitant, especially if, as
we  understand, the ISO's contracts do not commit the power to be available
to serve  the state's interests."? The OII challenges ISO's authority, "to
plan,  solicit and pay for construction of new power plants across the state,
absent  some substantial involvement of agencies that represent the state's
interests."? In other words, as noted in an article?from today's  Electricity
Daily (excerpted below), we now have a "turf war" between the CPUC  and ISO.
?
The Commission has classified the investigation as a ratesetting proceeding
and ordered the three?utilities to file a cost/benefit analysis on new
transmission upgrades as well as their own ability to build new peaking
generation for next summer. Their responses are due Nov. 22.? ISO and other
interested parties have until December 20 to files analyses and comments on
the  utilities' November 22 filings.? WPTF should discuss this new OII at
its  meeting on the 14th to decide if it wishes to become involved.? Please
let  me know if you want a copy of the OII.?
?
Dan
?
The following is excerpted from the 11/7 issue of Electricity Daily:
?
Turf War Breaks Out Between CPUC and ISO
"In  opening an investigation last week into California's transmission
system  reliability, the California Public Utilities Commission has started a
turf war  with the California Independent System Operator. Until now, Cal-ISO
had the  unquestioned authority to keep the lights on, but the CPUC now asks,
"At what  price?" and questions whether Cal-ISO has siting authority for a
slew of  transmission upgrades to be built by utilities to hasten more power
into the  state's strained system.

The CPUC has authority over utilities, but Cal-ISO is the agency that  is
approving transmission upgrades to be built by utilities and complementary
new generation to be built by market forces to hook into that transmission.
Although the CPUC has not stepped fully into the new generation siting
process  -- so far, a procedure that has been up to Cal-ISO and the
California Energy  Commission -- it does use the transmission inquisition as
a foundation to  question both transmission and generation projects."


T:  Please print and file in Japan file.  Thanks.  MHC

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.
----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000 02:50 PM -----

	John Viverito@ENRON
	05/12/2000 11:28 AM

		 To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Enron and PDI Japan

Michelle-

Thank you for your input.  In a separate e-mail, I will attempt to obtain
responses to the queries raised.

Best regards,

John

	Michelle Cash@ECT
	05/12/2000 10:59 AM

		 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Enron and PDI Japan

John,

Thanks for including me on the distribution of this -- I received your voice
mail and was glad to be in the loop.

In general, we try to avoid any type of personality/psych testing because of
issues relating to the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits
pre-employment medical testing.  It does apply to US citizens working for
Enron in foreign locations (i.e. extraterritorially).

Before we go forward and do this type of testing, it is useful to ascertain
the purpose/goal of the tests.  Why do they want this information?  Is there
another, less intrusive, way to obtain that information (e.g., references
from prior employers, etc.)?

As noted below, there may be Japanese labor/employment law issues that
address this type of activity as well.  I suggest that we obtain the
information above as well as the opinion requested below and then determine
how to proceed.

Michelle

	John Viverito@ENRON
	05/11/2000 02:44 PM

		 To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Enron and PDI Japan

Michelle-

Pursuant to my voicemail, I am forwarding the attached e-mail traffic for
your consideration.  I am unsure as to the types of testing contemplated, but
want to ensure that such activities are permitted under Enron's policy.

Your comments on the attached agreement would also be appreciated.

Thanks,

John
----- Forwarded by John Viverito/Corp/Enron on 05/11/2000 02:36 PM -----

	Phillip -SYDNEY- Taylor@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	05/10/2000 05:13 PM

		 To: John Viverito@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron and PDI Japan

Hi John

  Enron will be using PDI in Tokyo for candidate abilities testing prior to
employment.  The outcome of the testing is a confidential report that comes
to me (as HR) and I then send to the participant(s) in the recruitment
decision making process for their confidential consumption.  PDI have agreed
to me doing this via email, however are seeking some reassurance as to our
use of and maintenance of confidentiality of the final product.  Can you
review the attached and come back to me with your thoughts?  I would also
appreciate a local (Japan) opinion on the legal issues associated with
abilities/psych testing prior to employment (I know you guys shy away from it
in the US although it is quite widely accepted "down under").

Thanks and regards

Phil
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip -SYDNEY- Taylor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
on 11/05/2000 09:12 ---------------------------

"Jack, Douglas" <doja@pdi-corp.com> on 10/05/2000 21:09:41
To: "'Phillip.-SYDNEY-.Taylor@enron.com'" <Phillip.-SYDNEY-.Taylor@enron.com>
cc: "Matsushita, Mayumi" <mama@pdi-corp.com>

Subject: RE: Enron and PDI Japan

Phil,
With the e-mail transmission (using .pdf files), we'll need you or someone
else in Enron to sign a document similar to the attached letter. Please read
it and let me know if you want to make any changes before we fill in all the
details.

Thanks very much,
Douglas

 - emailrelease.doc


Trunkline LNG Company
5/18/00 - Trunkline filed for approval of a new rate schedule (LLS) for LNG
Lending Service.  It is patterned on PALS services*short term loans, with
repayment within 31 days.

any opportunities for us?
Hunter


SAN FRANCISCO, Aug 27, 2001 (paperloop.com) - Worldwide chemical paper-grade market pulp producer inventories declined 34,000 in July from the prior month, according to preliminary data from the Pulp and Paper Products Council in Montreal. The reduction is a 1 percent drop from June levels, and marked the fifth month in a row that world inventories have dropped.
World producer stocks closed July at 3.494 million tonnes, representing 38 days of supply, one day fewer than June results. Producer inventory levels are 54.7 percent higher than year-ago results, significantly better than the prior month's year-over-year 74.8 percent rise. In July of last year, world producers held 24 days of supply.
July production of 2.747 million tonnes rose vs. last month but declined 12.1 percent compared to the same period last year when producers churned out 3.124 million tonnes. Global shipments dipped only slightly from the prior month's year-to-date high. World shipments totaled 2.791 million tonnes in July, down 3.1 percent from year-ago results of 2.883 tonnes.
Producers operated at 88 percent of capacity in July. The operating rate mirrored June results but was down substantially vs. the 103 percent operating rate of the same time last year. The shipment-to-capacity ratio, considered an indicator of producer discipline, dropped 5 points from the prior month to 88 percent, PPPC reported.
World inventory figures include totals from North America, Nordic countries, Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Chile, France, Japan, Morocco, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, and Swaziland. Countries that do not report inventories include Russia, Indonesia, Taiwan, and Thailand.


Dear Errol McLaughlin,

The Return of Cigar Aficionado TV
Our original videos are back, and this time we take you inside the Graycliff
cigar factory in Nassau, the Bahamas. Watch Cuban cigar legend Avelino Lara
run one of the smallest cigar factories in the world.

http://www.cigaraficionado.com/Cigar/Aficionado/SpecialFeature/video/home.html

So You Want to Make Your Own Cigars
Doug Doan was obsessed with making a cigar rarer than a Fuente Fuente OpusX,
so he dug up his backyard, grabbed a can of Ortho and planted his own
personal tobacco crop.

http://www.cigaraficionado.com/Cigar/Aficionado/WhatsNew/Archives/20010402.cig
arnews2.wna

A Cigar Fit For A Soprano
Are you a fan of the hit HBO series "The Sopranos?" Vincent "Big Pussy"
Pastore has created his own cigar brand. Read about the launch, and about one
editor's encounter with the character at Rao's.

http://www.cigaraficionado.com/Cigar/Aficionado/WhatsNew/Archives/20010423.cig
arnews2.wna

http://www.cigaraficionado.com/Cigar/Aficionado/WhatsNew/Archives/20010423.wkw
rap.wna

What's Wrong With Cuban Cigars?
Our man in Havana, James Suckling, says that today's Cuban cigars don't have
the taste and performance of older Cubans. Read his regular column from Cuba,
Havana Corner.

http://www.cigaraficionado.com/Cigar/Aficionado/HavanaCorner/havana_corner21.h
tml

The Women of Cigar Aficionado
Claudia Schiffer. Demi Moore. India Allen. Linda Evangelista. Anne Archer.
They're some of the most beautiful women in the world, and they're in our new
photo gallery smoking cigars. Don?t miss this new feature.

http://www.cigaraficionado.com/Cigar/Aficionado/WomenOfCA/index.html

Cigars Go to the Supreme Court, and Derby Day Is Nigh
In our What's New section, read about cigarmakers taking an appeal to the
U.S. Supreme Court. Plus the most exciting two minutes in sports is Saturday,
so read resident cigar sage George Brightman's account of how to best enjoy
Derby Day.

http://www.cigaraficionado.com/Cigar/Aficionado/_whatsnew_html

That's only a small taste of what's online. Don't forget our Cigar Ratings
database, where you can peruse more than 1800 ratings of cigars; our Bulletin
Boards, where you can connect with other readers or post questions to the
editors of the magazine; Cigars 101, where you can learn the basics; our
newly expanded Drinks section (now featuring the rundown on single-malt
Scotch); our Counterfeit Gallery of fake cigar bands and much, much more.

See you online!

Sincerely,
Cigar Aficionado
http://www.cigaraficionado.com

-----------------------
To remove yourself from this e-mail list, simply reply to this message.
Be sure to include the following line in the body of your reply:

{{{errol.mclaughlin@enron.com/errol mclaughlin}}}


Thanks Leslie. I will assume that the Index and Poduct Type descriptions do
not require any further Legal review.

Eric - Please see the attached changes. Since we are making changes to the
Product Type description, I will need to put a ticker item on the website
alerting our customers of the change. This will be done Monday morning so
customers will see the new ticker item when they sign on. Also, ISO NY has
been tested - so we can release that on Monday as well. I need one more piece
of information for the PJM Index in order to be able to TEST that Index - and
will make every effort to get that done today and have PJM ready to go as
well.

Leslie Hansen
06/15/2000 03:50 PM
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: PJM Prices US East Power Swap

Dale:

Please see my revisions to the PJM Index below.

The Floating Price during a Determination Period shall be the average of the
hourly prices listed in the Index (in final, not estimate, form) for
electricity delivered during Peak hours on each Delivery Day during the
applicable Determination Period.  The Floating Price for each Determination
Period shall be calculated utilizing the hourly clearing prices published by
PJM Interconnection, LLC on its official web site currently located at
http://www.pjm.com/pub/account/lmp/index.html
ftp://www.pjm.com/pub/account/lmp/index.html, or any successor thereto, under
the headings "PJM - Locational Marginal Pricing Files; Western Hub"  (the
"Index").

Please note that we need to change the Pwr Fin Swap description to revise the
payment terms.  Sara and I have met and discussed this issue with the
relevant folks in great detail and determined that the current language is
not reflected in reality.  We also need to change the index definition for
the ISO NE index to delete the reference to "in final, not estimate, form".
Attached please find the revised long product descriptions for both ISO NE
and the NYISO.

Call me in the morning to discuss.  I have a meeting at 10, so try me before
that time if you get a chance.

Leslie

	Dale Neuner
	06/14/2000 08:24 AM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Kenny Ha/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: PJM Prices US East Power Swap

Legal/Commercial:

Here is my suggestion for the PJM Index. I will use a PJM Peak Loadshape that
mirrors the ISO NE and ISO NY Loadshape.

Kenny; et al:

Please map in TEST and PROD

Index:  PJM Interconnection
Abb:  PJM InterC
Sort Code:
Desc:  The Floating Price during a Determination Period shall be the average
of the hourly prices listed in the Index (in final, not estimate, form) for
electricity delivered during Peak hours on each Delivery Day during the
applicable Determination Period.  The Floating Price for each Determination
Period shall be calculated utilizing the hourly clearing prices published by
PJM Interconnection, LLC on its official web site currently located at
http://www.pjm.com/pub/account/lmp/index.html, or any successor thereto,
under the heading "PJM - Locational Marginal Pricing Files"  (the "Index").

Dale
3-9746

Eric Saibi@ENRON
06/13/2000 12:13 PM
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PJM Prices

The appropriate address is ftp://www.pjm.com/pub/account/lmp/index.html

This is the same as going to www.pjm.com, clicking on "Market & System Data",
and then clicking on "Daily Real Time LMP Data".


Notice No. 01-97
March 20, 2001

TO:
All Exchange Members

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
NYMEX ACCESS(r) Web Site

As of Tuesday, March 20, 2001, the NYMEX ACCESS(r) web site remains
unavailable for the ACCESS session for trade date March 21st.

Please call the NYMEX ACCESS Control Center (NACC) for all NYMEX ACCESS price
information at 1-800-438-8616.

We will provide an update regarding the status of the web site on Wednesday,
March 21st.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(01-97)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


This deal has been changed to reflect beginning of Daylight Savings Time -
now has total of 95,100 MW - down from 95,200.

Thanks,
Kate


---------------------- Forwarded by Julian Poole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
26/08/99 07:45 PM ---------------------------

(Embedded     Enron International
image moved
to file:      From:  Federico Cerisoli
pic30337.pcx) 24/08/99 12:21 AM

To:   Julian Poole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject:  Re: ISDA

Please encarg?te de esto.  Thks, Fede

---------------------- Forwarded by Federico Cerisoli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/23/99 05:17 PM ---------------------------

"Erik Ludtke" <elludtke@duke-energy.com> on 08/23/99 02:40:37 PM

To:   Federico Cerisoli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   "Alejandro Felices" <axfelices@duke-energy.com>, "Amy J Statler"
<ajstatler@duke-energy.com>

Subject:  Re: ISDA

The ISDA agreement has been executed by DEI and will be returned to Enron.
In
the meantime, can you please have your confirmation desk confirm the deal
with
Roni Cappadonna and send the confirm letter to her attention, as soon as
possible.

Thanks.

fceriso@ei.enron.com on 08/19/99 12:43:44 PM

To:   Erik Ludtke/International/GlobalAsset@DukePower
cc:   Roni A Cappadonna/International/GlobalAsset@DukePower, Alejandro
Felices/International/GlobalAsset@DukePower, dblack@ei.enron.com, "Sara
Shackleton" <Sara_Shackleton@ei.enron.com>, bhendry@ei.enron.com,
jpoole2@ei.enron.com
Subject:  Re: ISDA

Good!  I hope this is the first of a number of transactions we enter into
together.   Please have your people sending the ISDA back to our lawyers in
Houston with Duke's signature so we then complete the loop.

Julian, would you please co-ordinate asap with our Houston staff to have them
sending the confirmation to Roni at the fax number below?  Thanks.

"Erik Ludtke" <elludtke@duke-energy.com> on 08/19/99 10:07:36 AM

To:   Federico Cerisoli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   "Carol F. Graebner" <cfgraebner@duke-energy.com>, "Amy J Statler"
<ajstatler@duke-energy.com>, "Roni A Cappadonna"
<vacappadonna@duke-energy.com>, "Alejandro Felices"
<axfelices@duke-energy.com>, "Maria Zocchi" <mzocchi@duke-energy.com>

Subject:  ISDA

We are in receipt of the ISDA agreement, partially executed by ECT.

We would like for ECT to send the confirmation letter to Roni Cappadonna in
Houston, at 713-627-4778.  The fax number is 713-627-6524.

 - pic30337.pcx


print
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 10:01 AM -----

	Maureen Raymond@ENRON
	Sent by: Gwyn Koepke@ENRON
	02/26/2001 07:48 AM

		 To: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pushkar Shahi/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darren Delage/AP/Enron@Enron, Ellen Su/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Martina Angelova/LON/ECT@ECT, Trena McFarland/NA/Enron@Enron, Jurgen
Hess/LON/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, jennifer.fraser@enron.com,
anna.mehrer@enron.com, sgibner@enron.com, gmcclel@enron.com,
stuart.staley@enron.com, harora@enron.com, eric.boyt@enron.com,
shurwit@enron.com, shane.dallmann@enron.com, aaron.armstrong@enron.com,
john.allario@enron.com, andrea.v.reed@enron.com, joverdy@enron.com,
paul.mead@enron.com, john.sherriff@enron.com, richard.harper@enron.com, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael J
Beyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Ruffcorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
cindy.hudler@enron.com, mark.ruane@enron.com, mog.heu@enron.com,
alex.mcleish@enron.com, chris.mahoney@enron.com, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alhamd Alkhayat/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Haggerty/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diana Profir/LON/ECT@ECT, Yana Kristal/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Clara Carrington/HOU/ECT@ECT, jshankm@enron.com, david.foti@enron.com,
suzanne.ferlic@enron.com, tom.mckeever@enron.com, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
David Dupre/Corp/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: GMM - 23 Feb 2001

Please find attached this weeks' Global Markets Monitor, dated 23 Feb 2001.

Maureen Raymond-Castaneda and
Gwyn Koepke


Chris,
I left you a voice mail also, but I wanted to let you know I do know about these transactions.

Please give me a call.
Thanks
Theresa
(303) 575-6485

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Price, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:03 PM
To:	Staab, Theresa
Subject:	Midstream

Hi Theresa,
Do you know anything about two entries that hit co. 63K buying from 364 for 69,461 MM's and 52,221.  They were for production period Sept & Oct 2000.  They appear to be coming out of Unify, but I cannot see them.  Could you please let me know as soon as possible.
Thanks

Chris Price
Enron North America
Business Analysis & Reporting
Phone: 713-345-3799
Fax: 713-646-5997


-----Original Message-----
From: Theriot, Kim S.
Sent: Fri 12/7/2001 9:01 AM
To: Reeves, Leslie; Beck, Sally; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Adams, Laurel; Bruce, Michelle; Rohauer, Tanya; Hall, Bob M; White, Stacey W.
Cc: Murphy, Melissa Ann; Richardson, Stacey; Wallumrod, Ellen; Anderson, Diane; Denton, Rhonda L.
Subject: Termination List

FYI! See updated Termination lists below.  We are working on compiling the deal number lists for companies that have multiple contracts for Physical Gas and Power.  We will pass that info. on to Stacey and Jeff as soon as we have the information.

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Panus, Stephanie
Sent:   Thursday, December 06, 2001 6:43 PM
To:     Theriot, Kim S.; Rohauer, Tanya; Aronowitz, Alan
Cc:     Shackleton, Sara; St. Clair, Carol
Subject:        Termination List

Attached is the Master Termination List and an update for today.

Kim, this update is in addition to the update Sara/Gerald sent you earlier today.

<<Master Letter Log.xls>> <<Letter Log 12-06 (no. 2).xls>>

Stephanie


Hello everyone,
Mrs. Lay is taking inventory and organising her
furniture.  She has asked me email everyone with the
request for everyone to photogragh all furniture that
is not your own.  This means that if you have any of
hers or your fellow siblings furniture she would luike
a photo for our records by the 12th of October.
I have a digital camera or a polaroid that you can
borrow.  If you have no foriegn furniture please reply
with a "Nope, Don't have any!" by friday October 5th.

Also on a side note, Please be on time for the family
dinner on the 12th of October.  We will be taking the
kiddy christmas shot before dinner.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone.
http://phone.yahoo.com


Chairman John Quain of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission needs to
speak with Chairman Lay at his earliest convenience.

Mr. Quain would like to discuss a confidential matter concerning national
energy policy.  Mr. Quain is currently in South America with Governor Ridge
of Pennsylvania on a trade mission.

Mr. Quain would be available after 1:00 p.m. CST, tomorrow, Thursday, or
Friday at the latest for this conference call.  We will handle the logistics
of the call.

Kindly call me at (717) 783-8021, my direct line number, if Chairman Lay can
accommodate this request.

Thank you for your kind consideration.

Dennis J. Buckley
Counsel to the Chairman


Wanna come up?


Employees who ride Metro bus routes 214 and 216 please note that Monday,
November 13, 2000, the buses will return to their normal route on Lousiana
instead of Milam for the afternoon.


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001 04:38 PM -----

	"Webb, Beth" <WebbB@dsmo.com>
	03/06/2001 11:19 AM

		 To: "'dperlin@enron.com'" <dperlin@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron/NEGM GISB

Dear Debra:

As promised, here is a redraft of the language on the force majeure point:

"Enron recognizes that, when NEGM is acting as Buyer hereunder, NEGM is
purchasing gas on behalf of certain gas companies (the "Repurchasers") to
whom it immediately resells such gas at the Delivery Point(s).  In addition
to any other circumstances for which NEGM is entitled to claim force majeure
pursuant to this Contarct, Enron agrees that NEGM as Buyer shall be entitled
to claim force majeure if a Repurchaser purchasing gas from NEGM is unable
to take delivery or transport gas from the Delivery Point(s) as a result of
an event of force majeure.  The parties further agree that the term
"Transporter" when used in this Contract, including, but not limited to, in
Sections 4.1. and 11.1, shall include any company acting in the capacity of
a transporter for any Repurchaser and agree that Section 4.3 of the Contract
will apply to invoices from such Transporters for Imbalance Charges received
from such Transporters to the same extent as if such invoices were received
by NEGM, provided that any such Repurchaser scheduled and nominated the same
volumes as Enron and NEGM scheduled and nominated on behalf of such
Repurchaser at the Delivery Point(s)."

Hopefully this reflects our discussions of yesterday and today.  Best
regards, Beth

============================================================================Th
is e-mail message and any attached files are confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This communication may
contain material protected by attorney-client, work product, or other
privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person responsible for
delivering this confidential communication to the intended recipient, you
have received this communication in error, and any review, use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of this
e-mail message and any attached files is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this confidential communication in error, please notify the sender
immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete the original
message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@dsmo.com

Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP
http://www.legalinnovators.com


Just a reminder:

		YOUR TIME ENTRY IS DUE.

		If you have log-in problems call the Integrated Solutions Center at 713-345-4727.


this just made me laugh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Sanchez, Kathryn A" <ksanchez@houstonisd.org>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Sanchez+2C+20Kathryn+20A+22+20+3Cksanchez+40houstonisd+2Eorg+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, May 23, 2001 8:06 AM
To:	Sanchez, Monique; Sanchez, David S.
Subject:	Good Morning

 <<aggie_deer_hunter.jpg>>

Kathryn Sanchez, EdD
Assistant Superintendent
Research and Accountability
Houston Independent School District
Phone (713) 892-6350
Fax   (713) 963-9156
ksanchez@houstonisd.org

 - aggie_deer_hunter.jpg


There will NOT be a SWAP Group Meeting tomorrow, Wed, 8/29.    Please correct
your calendars to reflect The SWAP Group meeting is scheduled for the 1st and
3rd Wed. of each month--not every other Wed., as I had previously stated.  I
apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

Taffy


experian 1-888-397-3742 done conf#3267747298

equifax  1-800-525-6285

transunion  1-800-916-8800
                 1-800-680-7289


Please read the following information from Dr. Venessa Holland, the Enron corporate physician.  You have been identified as a person who has traveled to the Enron Washington, DC during this time period.  You can contact Dr. Holland directly at 713-799-2224 or via email at vah@flash.net <mailto:vah@flash.net>.  Dr. Holland will be in the Enron Houston office starting at 1:00 p.m. on Friday, November 2.

The CDC has recommended new updated guidelines for facilities receiving mail from the Brentwood facility since October 11.  Individuals in private facilities receiving incoming mail from the Brentwood facility are recommended to receive a 10 day course for prophylaxis with doxycycline.  This should include all permanent employees in the Enron Washington office and possibly other visiting Enron employees to the Washington office who have had possible contact with mail coming from the Brentwood facility.  The final recommendations regarding the completion of the full 60 day prophlyaxis will be based on further information from the CDC.  These are the current recommendations as of October 27 and are subject to change pending recommendations by the CDC.

The CDC has recommended doxycycline for use for prophlyaxis.  Presently, there is no indication that the anthrax is resistant to any antibiotics.  Doxycycline is just as effective as Ciprofloxacin for prophylaxis.   Doxycycline is a tetracycline drug and should not be used in anyone who is allergic to tetracycline.  Women who are pregnant should check with their Ob-Gyn physician prior to taking tetracycline.

All ENRON EMPLOYEES are encouraged to take the flu shot this year.  Since it is difficult to distinguish the symptoms of anthrax from the flu, the CDC has recommended that everyone have a flu shot.  All Enron employees from the Washington D.C. office and those who have visited the Washington D.C. office since October 11, should see their personal physician, if they develop any symptoms such as mild fever, muscle aches, malaise, shortness of breath and headaches.  These can be symptoms of the flu.  However, they also can be symptoms of inhalation anthrax.  If any such symptoms should occur, the employees should see their personal physician right away.  The employee should inform the physician where they work and what their exposure could possibly be from mail coming from the Brentwood station.

Dr. Venessa Holland


<<2XQGRED.DOC>>

Greg and Isabel:

A revised draft of the Escrow Agreement, marked to reflect changes from the
draft previously distributed on April 10, 2001, is attached for review.
Please note that ENA has not reviewed these revisions and reserves the right
to assert additional comments.  Please review and advise of any comments in
order that a draft may be furnished to the escrow agent as soon as possible.
Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure: 137032vR4/3

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2XQGRED.DOC


VEPCO-          890 MW  ON PEAK

ALLEG-     -0-   MW 'S  AVAIL   FOR  HE 8 ED -HE 16
	      3076 MW'S   HE 17 ED - HE 22

FE              443 MW 'S  AVAIL  FOR ON PEAK


Cool girl, that'll work out fine.  It sounds like Hope will be attending
also.  Kenny can't come, so that was disappointing, but I'll see him on
Saturday for his daughter's party.  Talk with you later.  We need to talk!!!!


Auntie Cara,

How are you?  I am doing fine, I guess.  I think I am passing through the shock stage and may be entering the exceptance stage.  I am still so dazed from this whole thing.  I am supposed to go back to work on the 5th and may not be going back at all.  This whole thing is so heartbreaking.

I am attaching my resume just so you have it, if you think of anyone who should see it from you contacts please pass it on.

Take care and I will keep you posted.

Susan


Martin,
?
I've calculated the total points everyone has earned over the  course of the
season based on where they finished each week.? For ties, i  took total bench
points to determine ranking - i think that's the way we do  it.
?
Assuming we all started with 100:
Greg  Martin????????? 158
Mark Friedman???? 152
Gary Lamphier???? 147
Scott Earnest??????  144
Tony  Harris????????? 143
Jeff Gossett????????  142
Bill Kasemervisz? 141
Martin Cuilla???????  139
Mike Morris????????  138
Gary Taylor????????  136
?
Of course, this doesn't take into account the points we've bid  on for
players we've picked up during the year.
?
Gary


Hey Dan, Gary,

Gary entered into this transation to sell this counterparty 1,000 mmbtu/d at
an Index related price with a Put option of $3.50 and a premium of 0.095.  As
I understand it, Gary will never be buying gas from his counterparty and this
is the only transaction he plans on doing with the counterparty.  If this is
the case, I would think only a Master Sales agreement would be needed instead
of a Master Purchase Sale Agreement and thus a Credit Worksheet is not
needed. Please let me know if this is not the case.

Thanks
Russell

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary W Lamphier                           01/09/2001 01:51 PM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: JER/BRE Austin Tech

Russell,
Please let Dan know you have approved this deal.

Dan J Hyvl
01/09/2001 11:37 AM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: JER/BRE Austin Tech

Gary,
 Credit has a hold on this deal.  As you are aware, we need a credit
worksheet before we can generate the proposed contract.  If you can get
Russell Diamond to issue a credit worksheet to me, I will be glad to start
work on the request.

	Gary W Lamphier
	01/09/2001 11:13 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: JER/BRE Austin Tech

Dan,
Did we ever send a contract out ot these guys?  I know we discussed it but I
bet I never requested a contract.  Let me know.


I will be on vacation tomorrow through next week.  I would be available pretty much anytime week of Oct. 8.

Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herber, Stephen
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 9:54 AM
To:	Abdmoulaie, Mansoor; Watson, Kimberly
Cc:	Gottsponer, Morgan; Matthews, Ron
Subject:	RE: TW/NNG & Sid Richardson

Mansoor,
Wednesday, Thursday a.m. or Friday works best for me.
Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Abdmoulaie, Mansoor
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 8:23 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Herber, Stephen
Cc:	Gottsponer, Morgan; Matthews, Ron
Subject:	TW/NNG & Sid Richardson

Planning has met with ENA on Tuesday and responded to the questions from ENA.
Let's four of us have a meeting in my office sometime next week and follow-up on this project. What day/ time would be good for you?
Thanks,
Mansoor


Eric,

Thank you very much for taking the time to speak with Tom Moore and me.
Attached is the (only) contract which I have received from the EBS
origination team trying to close a deal with BMC Software.  Steve Morse and
Chaz Vaughan report to Brad Nebergall (VP, Central Origination, EBS), who
reports to Jim Crowder (VP, Enterprise Services, EBS).

Please review, and provide your feedback to me, the EBS origination team
(Chaz, Steve, and Brad Nebergall), and Tom Moore.

If there are any other EBS deals/contracts on the table involving BMC, I
would like to do whatever I could to help them close on this.  Please let me
know if I can do anything else for you!  You can reach me at (x55968) or Tom
at (x55552).  The origination team is at (Chaz: x58815, Steve: x37137, Brad:
x34714).  On a final note, the originators have repeatedly driven home the
point that they must have this deal closed with BMC by end-of-day this
Friday, December 15.  I am focused on helping them win the business however I
can.

Thank you,

Jeff

Jeff Youngflesh
Director, Business Development
Global Strategic Sourcing
Enron Corp.
333 Clay Street, 11th Floor
Houston, TX 77002
t:  713-345-5968
f:  713-646-2450
c:  713-410-6716

----- Forwarded by Jeff Youngflesh/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000 01:46 PM -----

	Stephen Morse@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	12/11/2000 03:20 PM

		 To: Chaz Vaughan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Jeff Youngflesh/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: EBS Professional Services Agreement

Chaz,

I assume Jeff is running with this.  The contract needs to be in place by
Thurs. 6pm CST in coordination with the EBS agreement.

Thanks,

Steve

Steve Morse
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-7137-work
713-569-7912-cell
email:  stephen_morse@enron.net
----- Forwarded by Stephen Morse/Enron Communications on 12/11/00 03:24 PM
-----

	Jeremy_Aber@bmc.com
	12/08/00 03:35 PM

		 To: Stephen Morse/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Chaz
Vaughan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Ann_Munson@bmc.com, Joe_Young@bmc.com, Tari_Hoekel@bmc.com
		 Subject: EBS Professional Services Agreement

At the request of Ann Munson, attached is a revised draft of the Enron
Broadband Services Professional Services agreement.

This draft should replace any previous drafts sent.

 <<Enron Broadband Services Agreement 120800.doc>>

Jeremy Aber
Senior Legal Counsel
BMC Software, Inc.
Tel:  713/918-3743
Fax: 713/918-7306
jeremy_aber@bmc.com

The information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail is (a) Subject
to attorney/client privilege; (b) Attorney work product; and (c)
Confidential.

 - Enron Broadband Services Agreement 120800.doc


Bob:  Don't forget!  I have several confirms with power counterparties that I
need you to negotiate.  Thanks.  Sara


no but we did look, i dont think i am

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:14 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

so is that your way of telling me tha you are moving?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:12 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i told you i was a big jerk, im sorry, So houses are very expensive in the ny area

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:12 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i don't know i thought that i did something.  i had no idea that you were just being a big jerk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:11 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

how could i be mad at you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:10 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i don't know.  i thought that you were mad at me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:09 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

not really how about you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:07 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you think that you will get off that easy huh?  did it do you any good?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:06 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

sorry charlie, so how are things

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:06 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

do you think that you could have let me in on that little detail?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:05 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i justr thought it might be better for both of us if we didnt talk for a while

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:01 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

maryland, virginia...wherever.  so why didn't you talk to me?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:00 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

ny was good, you are ready to move where? i didnt not want to talk to you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:58 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

it was fun.  i am ready to move up there.  how was ny?  why did you not want to talk to me?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:57 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

ok, so did you have a good trip

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:56 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

no why?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:56 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

are you being mean

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:55 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

whatever.  good.  how about you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:55 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i just thought that it might be better no not talk for a while, sorry, how were your holidays

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:54 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

oh so you are talking to me now?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:54 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

so, how are you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:52 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

yes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:22 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

are you here


http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/letter_from_america/newsid_708000/70817
3.stm


Effective Monday, November 19, Mark Haedicke will office in the new building.  His location will be:  ECS 06788 (sixth floor, office number 788).

My new location will be ECS 06785 (just outside Mark's office).

Our telephone numbers and fax number will remain the same.

Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
e-mail:  janette.elbertson@enron.com


Weekly Update
Dec. 8, 2000

SHARE YOUR HOLIDAYS
Members of the Houston Texans front office, including Bob McNair and Charley
Casserly, donated clothing and canned goods Friday morning to KTRK/ABC-13,s
annual Share Your Holidays food drive.

Share Your Holidays is a community-wide effort sponsored by KTRK to collect
canned goods and other non-perishables for the needy in Houston and
surrounding areas. The Texans dropped off their items at the HEB Pantry Foods
store at the corner of Westheimer and Fountain View near the Galleria.

This year marks the 20th anniversary of KTRK,s Share Your Holidays. Last
year, the food drive helped collect 1,475,000 pounds of food at 45 sites.
More than 10 million pounds of food have been collected since 1980. Click
here for more information on Share Your Holidays.

http://www.houstontexans.com/home/general.cfm?cont_id=37438

OUT AND ABOUT
Casserly was the keynote speaker at the first Houston Texans Junior Training
Camp, held last Saturday at Memorial Park. The camp was for children ages
7-14. Participants learned the fundamentals of football through seven drill
stations manned by NFL Alumni, including former Oilers Charlie Hennigan, Ken
Houston and Don Trull.

Casserly and other members of the Texans, football operations staff also
attended league meetings in Dallas earlier in the week before returning to
Houston Thursday.

STADIUM TAKING SHAPE
The west side of Reliant Stadium is taking shape as the holidays approach.
These photos were taken from atop Reliant Astrodome. Texans PSLs and season
tickets are available by calling 877-NFL-2002.

http://www.houstontexans.com/facility/construction.cfm
---
You are currently subscribed to texansnews as: GWHALLE@ENRON.COM
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
leave-texansnews-179392T@newsletter.houstontexans.com


Please place the attached in attorney files.   Thanks!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Who will get them?  I am happy to sit down with him in a privileged conversation and discuss those statistics, which I think is the best way to protect the privilege.  Otherwise, if it goes to him at his request, then there is no protection if we find undesirable results.

-----Original Message-----
From: Corteselli, Gina
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 11:13 AM
To: Cash, Michelle; Oxley, David
Subject: Diversity information for VP PRC

Hi Michelle;

Dovie told me that she has had a chat with you regarding the diversity stats we were preparing for the VP PRC on 23 July.  Delainey had asked specifically for these stats, and that's why wewere including them.  Is there any way that we can provide the data, perhaps marking it attny privilidge?  If not, can we discuss this with Delainey so that he is aware of the reasons PEP PRC cannot provide it?  I'd apprecuate your thoughts.  Thanks, Gina


I'm on a call until about 10.  I'll come down and try to grab you and susan
and lets call MKM and get a plan.  df

Steven Harris
02/15/2001 08:49 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/Enron@EnronXGate, Shelley
Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Maria Pavlou/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeffery
Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW Expansion

Drew, I think your last question is the one most critical to us at this
point. The marketers can go out and start selling the project but are having
a hard time defining how the capacity will be allocated. I left a message
yesterday for Mary K. regarding these same issues. Thanks.

Drew Fossum
02/14/2001 04:38 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Shelley Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Maria Pavlou/Enron@EnronXGate, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW Expansion

There were several questions left for legal/regulatory to work on at the
close of our meeting today.  I'll try to restate them, and add my initial
thoughts, so we can all be sure to focus on the correct problems.

Q 1. Can TW use "negotiated rate" agreements for its new 150 mm/d expansion?

A.  Yes.  Independence, Guardian, and other new pipeline projects were
certificated on the basis of negotiated rate contracts.  The only restriction
is that we need to always offer cost-based recourse rate service as an
alternative to negotiated rates.  We hope to use negotiated rate agreements
for the entire 150 mm of capacity, but we won't know until the contracts are
executed how much of it will be negotiated rate contracts and how much of it
will be under recourse rate contracts.  I guess that means that in the cert.
app., we just tell the commission that we will be 100% at risk and that given
the huge interest in the open season, we have no doubts about our ability to
sell the full 150.  We should also tell the Commission we expect to sell the
capacity using negotiated rate contracts or recourse rate contracts or a
combination of both.

Q 2.  Can we give prospective customers a "cafeteria style" menu of options
(to steal Jeff's term), like the following:
 1.  5 yr. neg. rate deal at a locked in $.60 plus fuel and surcharges (or
whatever number we decide on)
 2.  10 y. neg. rate deal at a locked in $.45 plus fuel and surcharges
 3.  15 yr. neg rate deal at a locked in $.35 blah blah
 4 .  15 yr cost based recourse rate plus fuel and surcharges (importantly
this option is not locked in and will float with TW's actual rate levels and
fuel retainage percentages)

A.  I think the answer here is "yes."  Whatever options we come up with for
1, 2, and 3, we will always have to offer 4 as well.  Susan and Steve
Stojic:  please confirm that we have the right to define specific negotiated
rate options and stick to them.  Otherwise, this negotiated rate approach
could get completely unstructured such that we end up with some guys taking
our specific options and other guys custom tailoring weird variations (like a
7 yr, 231 day contract at $.51764, for example).  I'm not sure that would be
a bad thing, but we need to think about it.  We need to be sure we can tell a
customer "no" and make it stick if he tries to mix and match by asking for
the 5 yr term and the $.35 rate, for example.  I think we can lay out options
of our choosing and then enforce a "no substitutions" policy (this is
sticking with the "cafeteria" theme) but we need to be sure.

Q.3.  If we can use the "cafeteria options" approach, how much flexibility do
we have in structuring the options?

A:  This one is hard.  We need to be sure that the price and term we choose
to offer for options 1-3 is solely within our discretion.  We don't want to
be second guessed by FERC as to whether we should have offered option 1 at
$.58 instead of $.60.  Susan and Steve: if you guys confirm that we have
discretion in how to structure our negotiated rate options, does that mean we
can slant the economics of the negotiated rate options so they are a better
deal than the recourse option (for most shippers)?  I.e., could we
deliberately  incent shippers to sign on for the short term deals--i.e., by
offering options 1-3 at $.55, $.45 and $.40 instead of the $.60, $.45, and
$.35 shown above.  I suspect that is what Guardian and the other pipes did to
obtain 100% subscription under neg. rate deals.

Q.4.  How do we allocate capacity to customers if demand exceeds supply???

A.  Ideally, we'd be able to allocate the 150 to the guys who want to buy it
the way we'd prefer to sell it.  Under the above example, assuming Stan,
Danny and Steve decide short term deals are better, what if we get 100 mm/d
of offers on each of the 4 rate/term options described above.  That's 400
mm/d of demand for a 150 mm/d project.  Can we sell 100 to the guys who want
option 1 ($.60/5 yrs) and the remaining 50 to the 10 yr/$.45 guys?  That
really hoses the recourse bidders.  Do we have to cover the recourse demand
first and then allocate the remaining capacity pro rata to everyone else?
Pro rata to everyone?  Under the rule that negotiated rate bids have to be
deemed to be at max rate for purposes of allocation, pro rata to everyone may
be the right answer.  Or at least its the answer until we've filled the
recourse rate guys' orders, then we can give the remaining capacity to the
neg. rate guys whose bids we value most highly (using some objective
nondiscriminatory calculation of course).   Ugh.

Susan and Steve--please take a crack at questions 2-4.  I think 1 is answered
already.  I haven't done any research yet, so maybe these questions are
easier than they currently seem to me.  Get me and MKM on the phone at your
convenience to discuss.  We've gotta move quick so the marketers can get out
and sell this stuff.  DF


it looks great

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 10:09 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I got a new haircut!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 10:09 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

absolutely

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 10:08 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you like?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 10:08 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:

incredible


I'll be in New York. They will have to fly solo on this. Rick


I can meet on Friday from 12:00-2:00 or Wednesday anytime after 1:00pm.
Wednesday would be the best for me since we will be into bidweek on Friday.
But, I will make it work.

D

	From:  Jim Pond @ ENRON                           12/19/2000 07:54 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Megan Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Armstrong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kelly Ellis/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Meeting

Daren is unable to meet this morning.  James is out this afternoon, and I am
out tomorrow and Thursday.  What is everyone's availability on Friday
afternoon, 12/22 or next Wednesday, 12/27?

Please let  me know ASAP so we can schedule a room.

Kelly Ellis
12/15/2000 03:09 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Megan Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Armstrong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jim Pond/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Meeting

Jim would like to meet with all of you on Tuesday, December 19th at 10:00am
in EB2473A to discuss Tenaska IV Gas.


Hey, I hope you've gotton a chance to get a phone any everything.  I finally
have access to all the computer applications that I need.  If only I had
access to the directories with the required files!

Anyway, I wondering what you thought about drinks after work thursday and if
you had any venue preference?

Mat


These are the new wire approval requirements:

For Future Fundings:

EPI  - wires must be signed by Kevin Garland

ECR - wires must be signed by John Lavorato

Capital Calls and Facility Wires need to be signed by Joe Deffner

Please include a note on the wire on what the implications are if we do not fund the money.  This does not to be a long explanation.  It can be as simples as a contract default if we do not wire the money.


We are set to talk about these issues with Dave Delainey Thursday at 11.
Lets meet in my office at 10:30 for a premeeting.  Thanks.


You have signed the last beam....
 Now  watch it rise.

Enron employees are invited to celebrate the
 Topping-Out of Enron Center South
 this afternoon at Antioch Park
3:45 pm - 4:30 pm.

In celebration of Arbor Day, tree saplings will be
handed out to all participants.

In the event of rain, the Topping-Out Celebration will air on IPTV Wednesday
and
the tree saplings will be distributed in the plaza today at 4:00 pm


Ken,
I had a very successful meeting with Michael Capellas this morning.  Once
again, I want to thank you for making this relationship possible.  Michael
mentioned to me that the two of you are expected to meet this afternoon.
The following is an outline of my discussion points with Michael:
 CYNET Progress Report
 CYNET 2001 Business Plan
 CYNET's Bundled Solution (Convergent Messaging, iPAQ Expansion
Pack-CYPAQ, wireless modem and CYNET dialer software)
 Technology Demonstration
 Funding Discussion ($4 Million)
We are pleased to report that the relationship between CYNET and Compaq is
growing.  See attached excerpts from today's meeting.  If you have any
questions feel free to call me.
Vincent W. Beale

 <<Ken Lay.ppt>>

 - Ken Lay.ppt


z/f 10/12


FYI only

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doukas, Tom
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 5:24 PM
To:	Wall, David; Cooper, Edmund; Lowry, Donna; Landry, Shemeika S.; Lauer, Richard; Shackleton, Sara; Nelson, Cheryl; Gresham, Wayne; Schuler, Lance (Legal); Pizzolato, Paul; Kinneman, Jeff
Subject:

Dear All,

Thank you to everyone who has helped out today with the hopeful transfer of Anker positions from Enron Credit Inc. to ECT Europe Investments Inc. for quarter end.

We are still working on an effective means to move the positions over.

David Wall and Edmund Cooper in London will be working on this in the am for us.

From many discussions here today our options right now appear to be:

1.Transfer via stock power to ECTEI Inc.
Positions must be in certificate form first
Will take over a week to obtain certificates from DTC
NOT PLAUSIBLE

2. Set up prime broker account for ECTEI Inc. and transfer via DTC
Must fill out paperwork and set up account before transfering position
Highly unlikely to accomplish in one day considering amount of paperwork and signatures required

3. Find a merchant account with a prime account already set up
May not satify audit requirements, but many US entities have accounts
Possibly can find a Europe account with a custody or prime account that can accept DTC positions
Potential Cayman entities that roll to Europe with accounts

4. Internal structures
Suggestions Please


Attached are  EES's Volumetric NYMEX and Basis positions for 6/30/2000.

Thanks,

Monica


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001
04:19 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Karen Marshall                           01/11/2001 12:14 PM

To: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael B Rosen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy
Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Elyse Kalmans/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Invitation to 2001 Energy Finance Conference Feb. 22-23, 2001- The
University of Texas at Austin

The $500 registration fee is waived for any Enron employee who wishes to
attend this conference because of our relationship with the school.  Please
forward this information to your managers and staff members who would benefit
from participating in this important conference.  (Note:  Vince Kaminski is a
panellist for the Risk Management Session 3.)

Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at EXT. 37632.

Karen
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Marshall/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
07:38 PM ---------------------------

"Angela Dorsey" <Angela.Dorsey@bus.utexas.edu> on 01/10/2001 03:06:18 PM
To: "Angela Dorsey" <Angela.Dorsey@bus.utexas.edu>
cc: "Ehud Ronn" <eronn@mail.utexas.edu>, "Sheridan Titman (E-mail)"
<titman@mail.utexas.edu>
Subject: Invitation to 2001 Energy Finance Conference - The University of
Texas at Austin

Colleagues and Friends of the Center for Energy Finance Education and
Research (CEFER):

Happy New Year! Hope you all had a wonderful holiday season.

On behalf of the University of Texas Finance Department and CEFER, we
would
like to cordially invite you to attend our:

2001 Energy Finance Conference
Austin, Texas
February 22 - 23, 2001
Hosted by the University of Texas Finance Department
Center for Energy Finance Education and Research

Dr. Ehud I. Ronn and Dr. Sheridan Titman are currently in the process of
finalizing the details of the conference agenda.  We have listed the
agenda
outline below to assist you in your travel planning.  Each conference
session will be composed of a panel discussion between 3 - 4 guest
speakers
on the designated topic.

As supporters of the Center for Energy Finance Education and Research,
representatives of our trustee corporations (Enron, El Paso, Reliant,
Conoco, and Southern) will have the $500 conference fee waived.
The conference package includes Thursday evening's cocktails &
dinner and hotel/UT shuttle service, as well as Friday's conference
meals,
session materials and shuttle service.  Travel to Austin and hotel
reservations are each participant's responsibility.

A limited number of hotel rooms are being tentatively held at the
Radisson
Hotel on Town Lake under the group name "University of Texas Finance
Department" for the nights of Thursday, 2/22/01 and Friday, 2/23/01 (the
latter evening for those who choose to stay in Austin after the
Conference's conclusion).  To guarantee room reservations, you will need
to
contact the Radisson Hotel at (512) 478-9611 no later than Monday,
January
22nd, and make your reservations with a credit card.  Please let me know
when you have made those arrangements so that I can make sure the
Radisson
gives you the special room rate of $129/night.

Please RSVP your interest in attending this conference NO LATER THAN
JANUARY 22nd to angela.dorsey@bus.utexas.edu, or (512) 232-7386, as
seating
availability is limited.  Please feel free to extend this invitation to
your colleagues who might be interested in attending this Conference.

Center for Energy Finance Education and Research
PROGRAM OF THE 2001 ENERGY FINANCE CONFERENCE
February 22 - 23, 2001

Thursday, Feb 22:

3:00 p.m. Reserved rooms at the Radisson Hotel available for
check-in
5:30 p.m. Bus will pick up guests at the Radisson for transport to
UT Club*
6:00 p.m. Cocktails, UT Club 9th Floor
7:00 p.m. Dinner, UT Club
8:00 p.m. Keynote Speaker
9:00 p.m. Bus will transport guests back to hotel

Friday, Feb 23:

7:45 a.m. Bus will pick up at the Radisson for transport to UT

8:30 a.m. Session 1 - REAL OPTIONS
  Panelists:  Jim Dyer, UT (Chair)
    Sheridan Titman, UT
    John McCormack, Stern Stewart & Co.

10:00 a.m. Coffee Break

10:15 a.m. Session 2 - DEREGULATION
  Panelists:  David Eaton, UT (Chair)
    David Spence, UT
    Jeff Sandefer, Sandefer Capital
Partners/UT
    Peter Nance, Teknecon Energy Risk
Advisors

11:45 a.m. Catered Lunch & Keynote Speaker

1:30 p.m. Guest Tour - EDS Financial Trading & Technology Center

2:00 p.m. Session 3 - RISK MANAGEMENT
  Panelists:  Keith Brown, UT (Chair)
    Vince Kaminski, Enron
    Alexander Eydeland, Southern Co.
    Ehud I. Ronn, UT

3:30 p.m. Snack Break

3:45 p.m. Session 4 - GLOBALIZATION OF THE ENERGY BUSINESS
  Panelists:  Laura Starks, UT (Chair)
    Bob Goldman, Conoco
    Ray Hill, Southern Co.

5:15 p.m. Wrap-Up

5:30 p.m. Bus picks up for transport to airport/dinner

6:30 p.m. Working dinner for senior officers of Energy Finance
Center
Trustees

*We have made arrangements to provide shuttle service between the
Radisson
hotel and UT during the conference. However, if you choose to stay at an
alternative hotel, then transportation to conference events
will become your responsibility.

**************
Angela Dorsey
Assistant Director
Center for Energy Finance Education & Research
The University of Texas at Austin
Department of Finance, CBA 6.222
Austin, TX 78712
angela.dorsey@bus.utexas.edu
**************


Thought you might be interested in these two changes.  Mary has actually been
out of the office since late February.  All of her global database
responsibilities were transferred in late 2000 to James Scribner and his
team, under Beth Apollo.  Mary's effectiveness on CommodityLogic had been
lessened over time, and beginning with her absence in February I have relied
on my business leads (Bob Superty, Kim Theriot and Mechelle Stevens) for
their evaluation of the NomLogic, ConfirmLogic and InvoiceLogic modules.
--Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2001 04:06 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           04/18/2001 08:20 AM

To: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron, Peggy
Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/Enron@EnronXGate, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Apollo/HOU/ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT, Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Piper/Corp/Enron, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Hector McLoughlin/Corp/Enron, Frank De Jesus/Enron@enronXgate, Ryan
Seleznov/Corp/Enron, Robert Jones/Corp/Enron
Subject: Management Team Changes

Mary Solmonson has made a personal choice to resign from Enron.  It is with
regret that I have accepted Mary's letter of recommendation.  Mary has
contributed greatly during her tenure at Enron, particularly in the
development of global information that has been critical in supporting our
effective systems development and information gathering.  I do appreciate
Mary's personal decision, however, and I know that you will join me in
wishing Mary well.

Also effective April 16, we have made a realignment within Enron Net Works of
the group led by Sheri Thomas.  Sheri will now report directly to Andy
Zipper, who leads EnronOnline.  The Operations Product Control Team in its
early stages was focused primarily on making our transition to EnronOnline a
smooth one for operations.  Much time was spent initially on the bridges
necessary between EnronOnline and our legacy systems.  The role of the team
has evolved today to one that is intimately involved in the day-to-day
operations of EnronOnline.  With this evolution, it makes sense to have
Sheri's team as an integral part of the larger EnronOnline team.  Sheri's
team will continue to support other e-commerce initiatives, such as
Clickpaper, DealBench and CommodityLogic, so that we can leverage the
experience of her team and avoid duplication of internal infrastructure.
Sheri, Andy and I met with Sheri's team yesterday to announce this
organizational realignment.  Sheri has done a great job of leading the
Product Control Group over the past 14 months.  Sheri is committed to see
that her team continues to work closely with Operations to ensure that any
changes in Enron's e-commerce businesses that may impact trading operations
are shared with us.  We look forward to continuing to work closely with Sheri
and her team.


Start Date: 4/30/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001043003.txt
Error: Invalid variant type conversion

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


I will improve this tomorrow morning but here is what I am chiseling.  Really
need a good sentence on the J&R stuff to refute the kahn et al letter.

- Rob


when do I get my drink


Still employed?  How are you affected by this bankruptcy news?


Because I am taking a half day tommorrow.  It is on my calendar.

	Becky Spencer
	04/30/2001 11:24 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Need time!

This is a sufficient repsonse.  Hey, Dan.  You're loosing your touch!  How
come no days off??

	Dan J Hyvl
	04/30/2001 11:06 AM

		 To: Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Need time!

It appears that I had a lot of time in the office.  Every day.  No vacation
or sick time off.  Is this a sufficient response?

	Becky Spencer
	04/30/2001 11:02 AM

		 To: Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J
Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos
Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Vanessa Griffin/ENRON@enronXgate, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Need time!

Need time for pay period ending 4-30-01.  Thanks!


Chris--Attached is our requested volumes for 3/9 (intraday) and 3/10.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03-09-00 Daily volsAM.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001
05:38 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@Btu.net> on 02/02/2001 05:04:07 PM
To: "Btu's Weekly Power Report" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu's Weekly Power Report

Attached is the latest issue of Btu's Weekly Power Report

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wp020501.pdf


Looks good to me--and I agree that we ought to use if for internal purposes
only.  If people at the customer meeting want more detail than you guys are
able to provide orally, we could consider adding detail to the FERC filing or
even sending them some additional explanation that we may or may not decide
to file with FERC.  Good luck today!  DF

Jeffery Fawcett
08/31/2000 09:11 AM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steve
Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: revised TW Options Q&A

I'm distributing [internally] the brief answers we've crafted for each of the
customer's questions.  I think we're on pretty solid ground in each case.  As
mentioned below, we won't be distrubuting these answers during the workshop.
We'll use them for our own purposes in answering the questions orally.  If
you have any questions regarding this issue, please let me know.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 08/31/2000
09:08 AM ---------------------------

Jeffery Fawcett
08/31/2000 09:07 AM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: revised TW Options Q&A

Susan,
You hit the ball right down the middle.  I think we've answered these
questions [more than] adequately.  I do not intend to distribute these
answers in written form.  Rather, we'll answer them orally during the
presentation, and use your work product as a guideline for our answers.
Thanks for your hard work here.

	From:  Susan Scott                           08/30/2000 10:04 PM

To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum@ENRON

Subject: revised TW Options Q&A

Jeff, here's a slightly revised version of my bottom-line answers to Conoco's
questions.
Am I remembering correctly that this is for internal distribution only?
Again, I'll be out until around 10:30 tomorrow but you can reach me on my
mobile (713.494.5002) before 9 or after 10 if there's anything you want to
discuss.  Drew -- same goes for you.


Deal # 281938.1 	BPA

ds


'98 San Diego system averages:
9.4 cents     Total rate
6.1 cents      Power Supply portion, of which 1/4 was purchased power @ 3.0
cents and 3/4 was generation @9.1 cents.

Steven J Kean@ENRON
09/01/2000 08:27 AM

Sent by:  Steven J Kean@ENRON

To:   Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
      McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc:   Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Harry
      Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
      Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:  California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

Look at this.  Baum finally speaks up  -- way too late.
Can somebody tell me what SDG&E's energy rate was pre-dereg?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/01/2000
08:24 AM ---------------------------

 (Embedded
 image moved
 to file:      From:  Ann M Schmidt
 pic19169.pcx) 09/01/2000 07:57 AM

To:   Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
      Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:  California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

F.Y.I.

  California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs
  By Rebecca Smith

  09/01/2000
  The Wall Street Journal
  Page A4
  (Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  California lawmakers voted to extend modest relief to San Diego residents
burdened with
  high electricity bills and set the groundwork for faster construction of
badly needed power
  plants. They stopped short, however, of passing legislation that would
roll back retail power
  rates to levels seen prior to deregulation .

  Late Wednesday, lawmakers sent a bill to Gov. Gray Davis that limits to
6.5 cents per
  kilowatt hour the amount that small customers of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co. can be
  charged. The utility is allowed to add power-delivery and other
reasonable costs to that
  commodity price.

  The price, equivalent to a bulk power cost of $65 per megawatt hour, is
far higher than the
  average price of power for 27 of the 31 months in which California's
market has been
  deregulated. But in June and July, the average price of power obtained by
the utility from a
  state-sanctioned energy auction rose to 12 cents and 10.5 cents,
respectively, compared
  with the 2.3 cents and 2.8 cents charged in those months a year earlier.

  Passed directly through to customers,the resulting bills sparked a near
mutiny. The
  rate-cap measure applies to residential and small commercial customers,
as well as to
  schools and hospitals.

  In addition to the rate cap, which can be adjusted upward or downward by
the California
  Public Utilities Commission until December 2002, the legislature
earmarked $150 million of
  general-fund revenue, which can be used to subsidize San Diego power
costs if they greatly
  exceed the 6.5-cents-per-kilowatt-hour rate. For now, the utility would
be expected to make
  up any difference between revenue collected and the actual cost.

  Steve Baum, chairman of Sempra Energy, parent of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co., said the
  rate-cap measure is "deeply flawed" because it limits the amount prices
can rise but sets
  no floor. That means any shortfall could grow -- without a mechanism for
customers to pay
  it down -- until the end of the rate-cap period, which could last until
December 2002 or
  December 2003.

  Mr. Baum said Sempra stands to suffer an undercollection of perhaps $664
million, provided
  future prices approximate the New York Mercantile Exchange forward prices
through
  December 2002. "It's irreparably damaging to Sempra," he said because it
"creates
  tremendous uncertainty" that makes it hard for the San Diego energy
company to finance
  new projects such as a new transmission line.

  The legislature also appeared likely to approve a bill speeding up the
permit process for the
  construction of new power plants, in part by beefing up staffs of
regulatory agencies that
  review the plans.

  Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 - pic19169.pcx


yes, that would be great. Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Knudsen, Sheila A.
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 10:57 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Cc:	Goode, Diane
Subject:	FW: Employment Agreement Information
Importance:	High

Michelle/Diane -

Do you want the same info from EEL?  We have record of approx.140 employment agreements in our database from EEL - some are expats, most are locals.  Please advise ASAP as we will need to get the London HR team working on theirs.

Sheila

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Goode, Diane
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:51 PM
To:	Knudsen, Sheila A.
Cc:	Cash, Michelle; Mayes, Fran; Funkhouser, Shanna; Melodick, Kim; Slone, Jeanie
Subject:	Employment Agreement Information
Importance:	High

Sheila:  I understand Tammy is on vacation.  We need  someone to review the database that Tammy Joyner maintains and determine if the Business Unit named in the Employment Agreement is actually the Business Unit the employee is currently working for. If the employee is now working for a different Business Unit, then we will need to make sure the Agreement gets assigned to the appropriate Business Unit.

So, we need a list of the employees whose Agreements to be assigned.

Please let me know who can get started on this project.

By copy of this e-mail, we are asking Fran Mayes, Jeanie Slone, Shanna Funkhouser and Kim Melodick to let us know of any Agreements that need to be assigned.  We need to do this clean-up as soon as possible.


So nice to hear from you.  Everything here is hot, hot, hot, 107 degrees
today.  Nothing new going on here, the boys are doing great, just getting
really big.  I'm taking Kendall to the Dr. today to see if he has an ear
infection, he was up most of the night last night (rats!).  Jordan is so
cool, he taking gynmastics again and loving it.  Kendall is my little
roughneck!, he reminds me of myself, he's hysterical.  I am so glad I have
them!!!!

The wedding in Phoenix should be alot of fun, I think it's just going to be
Mom, Me and Nelle I think.   I'm leaving the kids with Todd.  Todd has a new
job where he works 12 hour shifts.  In fact, he's working with Ken Cowan,
but anyway it could be from 6 am to 6 pm or 6 pm to 6am,  It sucks when he's
working nights, but he really likes it.

Anyway, we're supposed to be leaving early today and believe me I am ready to
roll.  Anyway take care, talk with you soon!


No GCP adjustments.

    Best Rgds.

    Samuel x3-9890
    Enron Net Works _ Global Counterparty Team

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Moran, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, May  16, 2001 4:33 PM
To: Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Taylor, Mark; Reves, Brant;
Brackett, Debbie R.; Hardy, David; Campbell, Lesli; Clark, Cynthia; Enron
Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia;
Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang;
Maley, Paul; Clarke, Sonya; Davies, Tim; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya;
Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan,
Amy; LaFuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Kyle
III, Bill; Ebow, Amber; Lebrocq, Wendi
Subject: EOL Approvals: 05-16-01

Please see attached

 << File: EOL 05-16-01.xls >>
Regards,
Tom Moran
3-3017


===========================================================================
NEW RESEARCH AT WWW.FORRESTER.COM -- 1/11/2002
===========================================================================

How Can You Maximize Current Technologies?

The key is incremental investments in Web services technologies that
leverage legacy IT systems. Forrester's Technology Leadership Forum will
explore the real benefits of these enterprise-ready but not widely
deployed innovations. Featured industry speakers include:

     John S. Leggate, Group Vice President, Digital Business, BP
     Phillip Merrick, Founder, Chairman, and CEO, webMethods
     Gregory J. Owens, Chairman and CEO, Manugistics Group
     Greg Papadopoulos, Senior Vice President and CTO, Sun Microsystems

Forrester's Technology Leadership Forum
Web Services: The Next Technology Strategy
February 3-5, 2002
The Phoenician, Scottsdale, Ariz.

For more information or to register, please call our Events Hotline at
+1 888/343-6786 or visit us at
http://www.forrester.com/Events/Overview/0,5158,441,00.html

========
New Delivery Feature For Finding Report Graphics Fast

Forrester clients can now go straight to Report charts and diagrams from
the Quick View. Scroll down to "Figures & Data" to review the list of
titles -- a simple click links you directly to each figure or data file.
Go to any recent Report listed below and see for yourself.

===========================================================================

NEW Strategy Research:  11 Briefs
NEW Technographics(R) Research: 2 Data Snapshots
NEW TechRankings(TM) Research: 1 Category Update

===========================================================================

STRATEGY RESEARCH

ChemConnect's Buy Signals eMarketplace Normalization - Brief
Steven J. Kafka, January 10, 2002
Related to: B2B Market Focus
http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14372,00.html

M-Services Guidelines Require Wider Commitment - Brief
Carsten Schmidt, January 9, 2002
Related to: Mobile Commerce Europe Market Focus; European Internet
Commerce; European Business Trade On-line; European New Media; European
On-line Finance; European On-line Retail
http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14124,00.html

Operators: Go Indirect For SMS Marketing - Brief
Michelle de Lussanet, January 9, 2002
Related to: Telecom Europe Market Focus
http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14275,00.html

When To Pull The Trigger On Sell-Side Content - Brief
John P. Dalton, January 9, 2002
Related to: Site Technology Market Focus
http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14272,00.html

B2B Partners Will Spur Wrap Account Success - Brief
Charlotte Hamilton, January 7, 2002
Related to: Financial Services UK Market Focus
http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14251,00.html

Moxi Debuts The First True Entertainment Gateway - Brief
Josh Bernoff, January 7, 2002
Related to: Media Market Focus
http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14262,00.html

Opto22: An X-Internet Building Block - Brief
Charles Rutstein, January 7, 2002
Related to: Infrastructure Market Focus
http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14266,00.html

Selling Portals Won't Cure MedicaLogic's EMR Blues - Brief
Michael J. Barrett, January 7, 2002
Related to: Healthcare Market Focus
http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14263,00.html

Forrester's Top 10 Healthcare Predictions For 2002 - Brief
Bradford J. Holmes, January 4, 2002
Related to: Healthcare Market Focus
http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14257,00.html

IM Security Problems Are More Than Skin Deep - Brief
Frank Prince, January 4, 2002
Related to: Infrastructure Market Focus
http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14252,00.html

The Economic Slump Hardly Hits Net Sales - Brief
Jaap Favier, January 4, 2002
Related to: Retail Europe Market Focus; European Internet Commerce;
European On-line Retail
http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14061,00.html

===========================================================================

TECHNOGRAPHICS RESEARCH

Apple Tweaks Will Appeal Mostly To Loyalists - Data Snapshot
Jed Kolko, January 9, 2002
Related to: Devices & Access North America
http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/DataSnapshot/0,1317,14273,00.html

Server Vendors Have Room For Improvement - Data Snapshot
Charles Rutstein, January 9, 2002
Related to: Infrastructure Market Focus
http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/DataSnapshot/0,1317,14271,00.html

===========================================================================

REPRINTS

Forrester clients can order additional hard copies of our Reports and
Briefs; research is also available electronically to post on your Web
site. Please contact your Account Manager for more information.

If you would like to reach us, please click on the "Contact Us" link
on our Web site's left-hand navigation bar. You will have the option
to email your Forrester Account Manager or the Customer Center.
You can also call us at +1 888/265-7145 (toll-free in the United States
and Canada only) or at +1 617/613-5730, Monday-Friday, 8 a.m.-7 p.m.
EST, or email us at tech-support@forrester.com.

Please forward the following information to people whom you think would
benefit from Forrester's research:

To subscribe to Forrester's weekly research update, please go to:
http://www.forrester.com/Listserv?list=WEEKLY_RESEARCH&action=sub

Unsubscribing

If you do not want to receive this email anymore, please go to:
http://www.forrester.com/Listserv?list=WEEKLY_RESEARCH&action=unsub

Technographics is a registered trademark of Forrester Research, Inc.
TechRankings is a trademark of Forrester Research, Inc.


In connection with an internal audit regarding the safekeeping of margin
funds and securities, Enron Corp. has asked us to provide them with a list of
all the exchanges we trade on, what rules govern those exchanges and the
products we trade on them (in particular the clearing arrangements), and any
rules that govern brokers we may maintain funds or cash with.  This should
include all the products we may trade/hedge over an exchange including energy
commodities, interest rates, currencies, equities, etc.

Can you please provide this information no later than Friday of next week.
Much thanks!


Sounds good.

Tom Halliburton@ENRON
02/28/2001 08:03 AM
To: Matt Smith/NA/Enron@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Solver Licence Key

Matt,
How about dropping by around 2 pm and I'll show you how I could set this up.

Tom

Matt Smith@ECT
02/27/2001 11:57 AM
To: Tom Halliburton/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Solver Licence Key

Tom,

Sounds fine anytime is good.  Basically the parameters that need changing are
those on the Optimizer sheet:

Start/End Date
Spreads
Max Inj/With rates
Max Storage volume
Selected Curve
Storage Facility

I'm free all week, so let me know when and where if you want to get together.

Mat

Tom Halliburton@ENRON
02/27/2001 10:00 AM
To: Matt Smith/NA/Enron@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Solver Licence Key

Hi Matt,
Multiple values for parameters - sounds OK.  I'd add an extra run option to
the menu bar, and you could set up a list of parameters on a separate tab,
each line corresponding to a complete run.  How about a meeting tomorrow when
you could tell me what parameters need to be varied?

Tom

Matt Smith@ECT
02/26/2001 05:46 PM
To: Tom Halliburton/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Solver Licence Key

Tom,

I took a few days off and just got back....

Anyway, I haven't tried it without the key, but if you say it works, then I'm
sure it does.  One thing I'm realizing, though, is that it's taking me way
too much time to babysit this thing through multiple runs of the model even
when it does work.  In order to get the full benefit of your model I want to
run it a zillion times for many different combinations of parameters.  So, if
you haven't guessed already, I'm wondering how hard it would be to get this
thing to zip through some preset combinations of parameters and save the
results without me tending to it.  I envision a spreadsheet where I list out
all of the parameter values for each run, and the model picks out the
parameters, runs through a year's worth of data, and saves the summary sheet,
then steps to the next set of variables.  In this way I could set it to run a
bunch of times over night or something so it wouldn't tie up the work day.
Would this be just a separate macro?  What do you think?

Mat

Tom Halliburton@ENRON
02/22/2001 08:01 AM
To: Matt Smith/NA/Enron@ECT
cc:

Subject: Solver Licence Key

Hi Mat,
I took away your licence key from the back of your PC yesterday.  The
problems with our network licence for the solver have gone away - I do not
really understand what happened.  Try the model aand see if it works OK -
runs fine on my computer now, whereas it did not run 2 weeks ago.  I suspect
some sort of network problem, and IT have not been able to figure out any
more likely cause.

Tom


Here are 4 of the five legislative proposals our office has been asked to
draft.  The only one missing is no. 4, the expedited generation siting
proposal, which will have to be worked on more as we have just received
extensive comments from ENA and outside counsel (McCutchen).  By separate
cover, I will send Jeff Dasovich the summary letter desribing the proposals.
If changes are required, please contact Brian Cragg of our office.
(bcragg@gmssr.com)

Thank you.

Mike Day

 <<PART5.DOC>>  <<PART3.DOC>>  <<PART2.DOC>>  <<PART1.DOC>>

 - PART5.DOC
 - PART3.DOC
 - PART2.DOC
 - PART1.DOC


This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit.
Your mailbox size is currently 93410 KB.

Mailbox size limits:

	When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.To check the size of your mailbox:

  Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today),
  Select Properties and click the Folder Size button.
  This method can be used on individual folders as well.

To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries.

You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.

To turn Journaling off,
 click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items.

See client Help for more information.


Griff,

It is bidweek again.  I need to provide view only ID's to the two major publications that post the monthly indeces.  Please email an id and password to the following:

Dexter Steis at Natural Gas Intelligence-	dexter@intelligencepress.com

Liane Kucher at Inside Ferc-  lkuch@mh.com

Bidweek is under way so it is critical that these id's are sent out asap.

Thanks for your help,

Phillip Allen