Dan,

Thanks for the information.  Please tell anyone who is interested to call me.  Thanks.

Take care,
Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Badger, Dan
Sent:	Friday, November 23, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	Metts, Mark
Cc:	Whalley, Greg; Frevert, Mark; McMahon, Jeffrey
Subject:	Cash Offers For Enron Wind Europe

Mark:

In the last two days, three private equity firms have told me they would be prepared to make all-cash offers for EW's European operations before December 31. These are Babcock & Brown (London), Alchemy (Frankfurt) and FBR (Washington DC).  Based on what I know about Enron Wind, I would bet that the price for the European operations alone would be signicantly more attractive for Enron than the price for the combined US and European operations.

I don't want to waste their time if it's too late. What should I tell them?


Stinson,

Please, take a look at it.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000
11:12 AM ---------------------------

Gillian Lockwood
11/03/2000 07:42 AM
To: Pavel Zadorozhny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jarek Astramowicz/WAR/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: digitals

Pavel, Many thanks for your note.

I understand that Digitals are not core Enron business but as you know, I'm
trying to explore Digitals to give, for example, a company a guaranteed
income in year one (to mop up expiring tax losses). This  is offset by a
guaranteed expense in year two. See attached hypothetical example. The
digital will reflect an underlying commodity to which a company is exposed to
and would be part of a price risk management strategy, thereby giving it
'commercial purpose'.

I would be interested in hearing from you generally on the subject --  the
rational for using Digitals and  your knowledge of its use in other markets
(electricity or other commoodity or in the banking sector).

It seems to me that setting the srike is key and a 'value judgement' or am I
wrong, and are there curves and models which could help you substantiate
this? In any event, do you have a feel for what an acceptable % of chance or
likelihood that a commodity price hits the strike on a digital before it
becomes non arm's length and does not pass the smell test?

Vince, Jarek suggested that you may be able to assist. Your views would also
be appreciated.

Gillian.

From: Pavel Zadorozhny on 02/11/2000 15:15 CST
To: Gillian Lockwood/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: digitals

Digital options are extremely uncommon in the crude oil market. Nobody ever
asked me to show quotes in the OTC market. The only time we encountered them
was when producers, brought by our marketing team, wanted to sell a
knock-outable swap, whereby they would get a higher swap price in exchange
for cancelling the swap if the price settled below a certain level. This
structure had a digital put embedded in it, although the customers didn't
necessarilly know that. The companies were US oil and gas producers: Venoco,
Titan, Magnum Hunter, Patiena Oil & Gas, Belco, Central Resources. It was
about 1 year ago. In the OTC market, at about the same time, I asked for
quotes to hedge these transactions and sold a digital Cal 00 $16 swaption to
Elf and strips of digital puts to somebody else that I cannot recall.

I hope this helps.

Pavel


Frank,

Please ensure that Israel Estrada receives his previous access for IT purposes.  He was mistakenly removed on Friday.

Stacey


Hey! I'm so brain dead this morning I didn't even notice. But I'm sooooo glad
you had a good experience. I just think he's the nicest guy, so I bombard him
with people needing haircuts constantly. You know when I first went to him it
was because I couldn't get in to see my regular lady and he was the only
stylist who wasn't booked - now he never has a spare second! It makes me feel
like a proud mother. Thanks for letting me know.

Kate

Emily Butler
03/23/2001 10:19 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Ziva

Brett is awesome!
I got my haircut yesterday and I LOVE it.
Thanks so much for the recommendation!
: )  Em


fyi

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Cherry, Brian
> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 10:36 AM
> To: Andrew Niven (E-mail); Benjamin Campbell (E-mail); Dan McLafferty
> (E-mail); Dan Thomas (E-mail); David Anderson (E-mail); Dede Hapner
> (E-mail); Dennis Gee (E-mail); Donald Petersen (E-mail); Frank Lindh
> (E-mail); G Jefferson (E-mail); Gary Guerrero (E-mail); Geoffrey Bellenger
> (E-mail); George Clavier (E-mail); J Reidenbach (E-mail); Jerry Miller
> (E-mail); John Armato (E-mail); John Clarke (E-mail); Joshua Bar-Lev
> (E-mail); Karen Tomcala (E-mail); Kevin Ernst (E-mail); Kirk Johnson
> (E-mail); Les Buchner (E-mail); Les Guliasi (E-mail); Linda Agerter
> (E-mail); Lisa Lieu (E-mail); Lise Jordan (E-mail); Mark Huffman (E-mail);
> Michael Katz (E-mail); Neha Patel (E-mail); Patrick Golden (E-mail); Paul
> Sivley (E-mail); Randall Litteneker (E-mail); Ray Williams (E-mail);
> Richard Hall (E-mail); Rodney Boschee (E-mail); Sandra Burns (E-mail);
> Sandy Dickinson (E-mail); Shaun Halverson (E-mail); Shelly Malekos
> (E-mail); Shirley Woo (E-mail); Stuart Tartaglia (E-mail); Todd Arnett
> (E-mail); Trista Berkovitz (E-mail)
> Subject: OII on Gas Curtailment and Diversion Priority for Noncore
> Customers
>
> The agenda for the March 15 Commission business meeting lists a new
> investigation into whether the curtailment and diversion priorities for
> noncore natural gas customers in the service territories of PG&E and
> SoCalGas should be changed.  It appears that Norm Pederson's PFM in the
> Gas Accord on this issue has no engendered a new Commission investigation.
> I'll forward copies to everyone who is interested as soon as I get a copy
> of the OII..


thank you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zisman, Stuart
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:32 PM
To:	Parks, Joe; McMichael Jr., Ed
Subject:	FW: Cash Request for Trunkline

A copy of this has been sent to cash committee for review tomorrow.

Stuart

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zisman, Stuart
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:30 PM
To:	Schneider, Chip
Cc:	Sewell, Doug
Subject:	Cash Request for Trunkline

 << File: CASH approval request Trunkline.doc >>


Agree, especially if the guy doesn't even want it anymore!

For background, this directory id one I set up for Dave Ryan and Todd deCook
to deposit there forecast data and exchange with mine

- - - Mike


As far as I know, this is the policy for all online trading.  Did I miss
something?

Debbie R Brackett
10/15/99 10:34 AM
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Mathes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EOL - Master versus Online GTCs

I understand this is our stance here in the US for financial trades......but
why the difference in physical? English law?

David Hardy
10/15/99 09:16 AM
To: Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL - Master versus Online GTCs

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by David Hardy/LON/ECT on 15/10/99 14:17
---------------------------

Justin Boyd
15/10/99 09:16
To: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Meagan Brinkworth/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL - Master versus Online GTCs

The underlying contractual structure for trades effected on-line between the
relevant Enron entity and a Counterparty is as follows:

if there is an existing Master for the particular product between the
contracting parties, that Master will govern on-line trades.
if there is no Master between the parties, then the applicable on-line GTCs
will apply.

If the terms of a Master are unacceptable to us for whatever reason (e.g. due
to insufficient credit provisions), then it may be appropriate to terminate
that Master.
If however, we wish to keep a Master in place but do not wish to use it for
on-line trades, then the counterparty needs to be notified of this and give
its consent.  Such notice could state that until the Master had been suitably
amended (i.e. by the negotiation of new credit provisions), then the on-line
GTCs will apply.

Justin


Richard:

In the US we have changed our swap agreement forms to provide for arbitration
in order to avoid having to explain the intricacies of derivatives trading to
judges or, God forbid, juries.  In Canada we are continuing to submit to the
jurisdiction of Canadian courts (on the theory that there are no juries in
civil actions and arbitration is rarely used in Canadian contracts
generally).  As we are presently in the process of revising our UK swap
agreement forms, I guess it's time to revisit the issue as it applies to UK
agreements.  Currently we agree to UK law and the jurisdiction of UK courts
(where there are no juries in civil actions).  Should this continue to be our
policy or should we begin going for arbitration in the UK contracts also?  I
would ask Paul and Scott to let Richard and me know if arbitration is widely
enough used in UK agreements that we can get away with asking for it.

Thanks,

Mark


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JDASOVIC>
To: 'Nancy Sellers' <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>, 'Jeff Dasovich' <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>, Prentice @ Berkeley <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers <PSellers@pacbell.net>
Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:01:32 GMT
Subject:

wouldn't miss it.  how's lil' annie doing?

-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Sellers [mailto:Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:59 AM
To: 'Jeff Dasovich'; Prentice @ Berkeley; Prentice Sellers
Subject: SUNDAY

I certainly understand your anxiousness to get up to the dome for shrooms,
but I hope you can plan to be in Napa earlyish on Sunday for a little family
dinner.  I would really appreciate it.

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


Over the last few months, we have been discussing our standard E-mail
platform with you, our customer.  Your feedback from the various
demonstrations, surveys and Technology Showcases validated that E-mail is a
vital part of your ability to communicate effectively.  However, your
feedback also indicated that you need your E-mail client to have additional
functionality and increased integration with other applications you use.
Therefore, to meet the demands of our fast-paced business, Enron Net Works is
standardizing our E-mail platform by deploying Microsoft Outlook 2000 to all
the Business Units we currently support for messaging.  (Project plans for
EBS, EES and Azurix are still being finalized and will be communicated
separately.)

This conversion from Lotus Notes to Outlook 2000 will improve your ability to
communicate and provide a more consistent look and feel across the standard
office applications you use on a daily basis.  We are excited about this
opportunity to provide a more robust, full function solution for your
messaging needs.   To provide you with additional details about the
conversion from Lotus Notes to Outlook 2000, we are including a list of
frequently asked questions about this project.

How does this project affect me?
Your current Lotus Notes E-mail system will be converted to Microsoft Outlook
2000.

What is Microsoft Outlook 2000?
Outlook 2000 is the messaging client you will use to read your E-mail, update
your calendar and personal address book, record to do lists, etc.

Why are we switching to Outlook 2000?
Outlook 2000 integrates more effectively with our new operating system,
Windows 2000, and the Microsoft products that Enron currently uses. With
Outlook 2000, we can provide you with a more robust mail platform including
the following new features:

Instant Messaging ) Ability to send person-to-person, immediate, pop-up
messages.
Improved Palm/CE Synchronization ) Allows for simpler and quicker updates of
your hand held device from multiple places.
Conferencing Server ) Ability to conduct video conferences from your desktop.
Web Access ) Ability to retrieve your Enron E-mail via a browser.
Fax Integration ) Ability to send/receive faxes from your E-mail Inbox.
Voice Mail Integration ) Ability to have your voice mail delivered to your
E-mail Inbox for retrieval.

When will the Outlook 2000 rollout start and when will I get it?
The pilot will begin in late October with the production rollout beginning in
late November.  We are finalizing our Business Unit rollout schedule.
Additional information will be provided to all business units as it becomes
available.  Project updates will be posted on the Project section of the IT
Central web site at http://itcentral.enron.com.  Additionally, you may send
questions to Outlook.2000@enron.com, and a member of the project team will be
happy to address these individually.


Mark:
This is the e-mail where DF objected to my proposed termination rights
language that I would like to talk to you about so that we can come up with
some language that I can use for those parties whom we have agreed have the
right to terminate.  Could you please stop by when you have some time?
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2000 10:24 AM -----

	David Forster@ENRON
	04/28/2000 06:05 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: kennecott

I don't like specifying a time period for termination. I remember we had a
lengthy discussion on this with Mark Taylor. I seem to recall that the
solution was that we would employ resonable efforts to process the
termination request (please confirm with Mark). I don't think they will be
happy with three days.

Dave

Carol St Clair@ECT
04/28/2000 01:35 PM
To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: kennecott

David:
Here is a draft of the ETA amendment letter that we have been discussing with
Kennecott.  It includes my proposed modifications to deal with giving them
the termination right which I have highlighted.  The current ETA states that
all notices become effective immediately.  I have inserted in my language a 3
day period after we receive a termination notice before it becomes
effective.  This creates a difference between Us and our Counterparty's since
our termination notice would become effective immediately.  What do you
think?  Do we need this 3 day period or are you okay with having their
termination notice becoming effective on the date of our receipt?
Carol


The following points refer to the methodology that we are taking to rebook
the New Albany Plant.  Please send me a note immediately if you disagree.
Assume that NewAlb is a non mark to market entity and Enron is the mark to
market entity.  However, it is fully owned and operated by us for now.

*  The power mark to market book will pay NewAlb a capacity payment of $4.87
for 5 years.  We shaped this payment as follows:

2001 - $5.06
2002 - $4.96
2003 - $4.86
2004 - $4.75
2005 - $4.65

*  This payments allows Enron to supply gas to NewAlb and receive power.

*  Enron will pay NewAlb $1000 per unit start.

*  Enron will also pay NewAlb $2.00/MW hour for varialbe o&m.

*  This will create an entity "NewAlb" that will return 9% assuming a book
value of $336/kw on 12/31/2005 vs. 409 currently.

*  If NewAlb pays the 9% out that entity should be relatively flat each year
for the next five.


Kimat, It looks like we have some deals booked twice.  Take a look at my
worksheet.  All volumes are monthly, positive is supply, negative is a sale.
Also, I believe deals 231667 and 226703 should be moved to New Power.

What about deal 202939?  Normally, I move this deal to CGAS and its very
confusing the way I do it.


IEP is continueing to cover the various CPUC/FERC/Fed Hearings in San Diego
related to the California marketplace.  We are doing this under the auspices
of the Market Response Project.  Below is a brief summary from Doug Kerner
regarding the series of San Diego Hearings last week.

IEP also is preparing draft comments in response to CPUC Commissioner Wood's
OII on Market Structure.  This will be circulated for your review and
comment in the very near future.

----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Janssen <EricJ@eslawfirm.com>
To: 'Steven Kelly' <steven@iepa.com>
Cc: 'Katie Kaplan' <kaplan@iepa.com>; 'Jan Smutny-Jones' <smutny@iepa.com>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 3:39 PM
Subject: Market Response

> Steven,
>
> On IEP's instruction, I've paid attention to, and attended to the minimal
> extent necessary, Commission proceedings on the investigation into
> "wholesale" rate problems - with particular emphasis on SDG&E, as one
would
> expect.
>
> A prehearing conference in the Order Instituting Investigation (OII) into
> these issues was held on August 29, 2000 in San Diego.  It was
enlightening,
> for reasons I next discuss, and reaffirms pursuit of a strategic attitude
> for IEP which we previously have discussed.
>
> What I found enlightening was that a) the "consumer" representation was at
> an organized and well-informed level.  Speakers for this constituency were
> from, for example, the Chamber of Commerce, the League of Women Voters and
> AARP.  All had done their research and were almost uniform in their
interest
> in retail issues, as opposed to the obvious "greedy generator" issues
which
> certain members of the government institutions have attempted to focus on.
> These presentations were followed up nicely by a small, but significant,
> number of ESPs who presented or represented offers to provide new and
> interesting retail products if only the CPUC would get out of the way.
>
> I limited my presentation to the end, focusing on the procedural point
that
> a subsequent "scoping memo" from the Commission should invite comment, and
> in particular should certainly not preclude, inclusion of retail solutions
> in the Commission's investigation of ways to provide relief for SDG&E and
to
> prevent recurrence of similar problems with the other utilities.  As is
> obvious from this comment, I think we have a real opportunity to both
> deflect attention from the so-called wholesale-generator piracy and
increase
> retail opportunities for the Members in the context of this new OII.
>
> The only direct, adverse commentary I heard was from a Utility Workers of
> America "representative" who advocated 1) for reregulation of the industry
> and 2) against TOU metering on the view that this would favor moneyed
> ratepayers over the others.  I think our colleagues (which by the way
> include the ORA after today) will find this disregard of conservation and
> DSM opportunities to be distasteful.  I also think the underlying interest
> in these comments is pretty transparent and believe it was not lost on the
> attendees.
>
> Bottom line:  as we previously have discussed, this is an excellent time
and
> opportunity for IEP to introduce itself to the community here, and
statewide
> I suppose, as the voice of "electricity service providers" - which
includes
> the entire range of QF projects, renewable technologies, cogeneration,
> conservation, ESPs and marketers and new generators which have already and
> are now poised to invest many hundreds of millions of dollars in
California
> (to correct deficient and negligent investment in new infrastructure).
>
> I had a particularly enjoyable conversation with the AARP representative
who
> well understood, and was mystified at, the failure of responsible parties
> (SDG&E) to invest in new generation since it was "obvious" to all that
such
> investments were necessary.  I'll summarize with the mere observation that
> the BRPU story was of great interest to her.  She, and again in my
> estimation most of the serious participants, also is aware that SDG&E has
> failed to maintain the natural gas infrastructure necessary to support
even
> the existing generation, let alone needed additions.
>
> I look forward to discussing this with you in further detail.  As noted, I
> think IEP as the representative of the full range of new, old and
interested
> non-utility electricity providers has a marvelous opportunity to take the
> helm.  I'll be returning to Sacramento on Thursday.
>
> -Doug Kerner
>
>
> Eric Janssen for Doug Kerner
> Ellison Schneider & Harris  LLP
> 2015 H Street
> Sacramento, CA  95814
> Phone: (916) 447-2166
> Fax: (916) 447-3512
> mailto:ericj@eslawfirm.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This communication and any accompanying
document(s)
> are confidential and privileged.  They are intended for the sole use of
the
> addressee.  If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised
that
> any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
> reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited.  Moreover, any
such
> inadvertent disclosure shall not compromise or waive the attorney-client
> privilege as to this communication or otherwise.  If you have received
this
> communication in error, please contact the sender at the internet address
> indicated or by telephone at (916)447-2166. Thank you.
>


Mark,

Thanks for the good news on Friday.

Can you please outline the pocedures we should follow for our Online LME
business.

regards
bruce


Hi Kate,
Just checking on this deal.  Is this gonna be an exchange for physical and
the counterparty name will be added later?  It's been "new" for a couple of
days now, which is fine, I just wanted to make sure someone is working on it.
Thanks,
Kim


is attached.  You will note that, in both the Intro and the second paragraph
under the What FERC Can Do section, I have softened the MB-rate argument.
The phantom sentence is also removed.  Let me know if I can be of further
help.

 - 0131527.01


Russell,  The 2nd Huber transaction was executed and Huber is contractually
bound to take assignment of the transportation.  We have gotten approval of
the assignment form from the Pipeline and expect to execute the assignments
and capacity release documents with Huber next week.  The capacity release
document just specifies the details of the capacity release.  Huber is bound
by the 2nd transaction to accept our release.    I will let you know when
these sets of documents are executed.

Let me know if you have any questions.

	Russell Diamond
	11/03/2000 11:08 AM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: JM Huber

Gerald,

Can you please let me know where we stand with the execution of the JM Huber
transactions and contracts that is being originated in the Denver office.  As
you are aware the first transaction and contract we entered into did not
contain the assignment language for the transportation on a yearly basis.
The second transaction was to include this assignment language.  ENA
currently has large exposure from JM Huber for the first transaction because
the assignment contracts have not been signed as of yet, as far as I am
aware.  If the contract negotiations are going to continue for an extended
period of time, Credit is going to have to reserve the transactions to cover
this exposure.  Please let me know what the status is.

Thank you,
Russell


Please ask Ken to sign the following.  But, in the Advisory Council letter
delete the reference to the December Board meeting and check with Ken on
whether he still plans to brief the Enron Board at the December meeting (I
believe he talked to Kelly Kimberly about this).
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/01/2000 04:10 PM -----

	Susan Worthen@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	10/31/2000 10:37 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Ken Lay Draft Letters

Steve,

Per our meeting yesterday, attached are the draft letters from Ken Lay to the
Board and Advisory Council.  l will deliver a box of Annual Reports today so
that they can be delivered to Rebecca Carter once the letters are signed and
returned to you.

Please call me if there are any questions.

Susan Worthen
Director
Environmental Compliance, Enron Corp
713/646-6579  713/345-6164 fax
3AC 1525


Mark,

I thought you would be interested in this.

Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2000 11:29 AM -----

	Martin Rosell
	06/06/2000 10:36 AM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael R
Brown/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Financial Energy Master Agreement

FYI, please find attached Conformed Copies of the Nordic law FEMA opinions,
together with a first draft of our own Schedule (which we expect to circulate
to counterparties in short).

Martin


?
 - santa61.jpg


That sounds great!!  We're looking forward to the trip as well.  The kids are
anxious to have Alexia and Sebastien here to play with.  I don't know if
there are any activities in particular that Alexia and Sebastien want to do,
but I know Kali and Michael would be happy just to play at home and swim.
Mayba a movie or two.  By the way, we just saw Spy Kids for the second time.
If it's playing down there, you ought to take the kids.  Alexia will
especially enjoy it.

See you soon.

Love,

Susan

"Janis Pereira" <janisp@dialdata.com.br> on 04/25/2001 09:48:23 AM
Please respond to "Janis Pereira" <janisp@dialdata.com.br>
To: "Susan Pereira" <Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: TRIP PLANS

Hi Susan,
??? How's it going?? I  firmed up everything with the travel agent
yesterday.? I still don't have a  price to give you because the hotel hasn't
set one yet for the ground portion  (that's life in Brazil!), but it will be
somewhere in the range that I had said  earlier.?
??? Everything is all set and  reserved, and as soon as we have a price I'll
purchase them.? So for the  time being don't worry about writing a check and
I'll get back with you when  it's all finalized.? I'm really looking forward
to having the kids return  with us and having you guys come down...it's going
to be a lot of  fun!
??? Talk with you  soon..............Jan


Attached is the UBS summary.  The UBS deal is confidential due to its large
size and the summary is an informal overview.  The deal structure has not
been defined; this sheet provides only rough details.  Call if you have any
questions.
Erin
ext 3-9677


Thank you!

-----Original Message-----
From: Kaminski, Vince J
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:07 AM
To: Smith, William
Subject: RE: This week's newsletter

Sam,

Here it comes.

Vince

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, William
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:21 AM
To: Kaminski, Vince J
Subject: This week's newsletter
Good Morning, Vince!

I'd be happy to do a newsletter today if you will have a Kaminski's Column.  But, I will be on vacation tomorrow and Wednesday.  Alternately, if things are too hectic for you today, we can always cancel this week's issue and just do one next Monday.

Would you please let me know what you think?

Thank You,

Sam


Yes.  Save the welcome back for Sunday.  Today is when HE split (right, Father?).

-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 7:54 AM
To: Chet Fenner; Brad Corrier; Joe Parks; EriK Wollam; Brian Constantine; Brian & Terry Constantine
Subject: G.F.

Any of you swines fortunate enough to work today?  I have some minor boning to do later but will get IN eventually.  Hope ya'll have a so-so, OK, decent, better than average, or just plain Good Friday.
Welcome back jesus.

C.


Mark:

Just in case you're curious, attached is a listing of items Jason is handling
for the group.  I'm trying to keep track.


i assume means carrying equity positions, which of course the line would not
be used for.
john

Sarah Wesner@ENRON
11/20/2000 12:47 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FIMAT loan agreement

John - the FIMAT loan agreeemnt will prohibit ENE from using loan proceeds as
follows:
No part of the proceeds of any Advance hereunder will be used for
"purchasing" or "carrying" any "margin stock" within the respective meanings
of each of the quoted terms under Regulation U of the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System as now and from time to time hereafter in effect.

Do you know whether you engage in purchasing or carrying margin stock?  I
will check with legal as well.

Sarah


__________________________________
MARKET ALERT
from The Wall Street Journal

December 13, 2000

The Nasdaq composite dropped 108.31, or 3.7%, to 2823.46 Wednesday as
investors turned their attention to earnings warnings. The market couldn't
sustain initial enthusiasm that the election drama was nearing a close, but
the Dow industrials finished up 26.17 at 10794.44.

FOR MORE INFORMATION, see:
http://interactive.wsj.com/pages/money.htm
TO CHECK YOUR PORTFOLIO, see:
http://interactive.wsj.com/pj/PortfolioDisplay.cgi

__________________________________
ADVERTISEMENT

Visit CareerJournal.com, The Wall Street
Journal's executive career site. Read 2,000+
articles on job hunting and career management,
plus search 30,000+ high-level jobs. For today's
features and job listings, click to:

http://careerjournal.com

__________________________________
LOOKING FOR THE PERFECT HOLIDAY GIFT?

Give a subscription to WSJ.com.

Visit http://interactive.wsj.com/giftlink2000/

____________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION

TO REMOVE YOURSELF from this list, see:
http://interactive.wsj.com/user-cgi-bin/searchUser.pl?action=emailalert

Then uncheck the appropriate box to unsubscribe from this list.  Click on
the "save selections" button.

When you registered with WSJ.com, you indicated you wished to receive this
Market News Alert e-mail.

For further questions, please call our customer service department at
1-800-369-2834 or 1-609-514-0870 between the hours of 8 a.m. and 9 p.m
Eastern Monday-Friday or e-mail inquiries@interactive.wsj.com.

__________________________________
Copyright 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


when?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:51 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

ill let you know

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:51 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

What are we going to do next week?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:51 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

yeah i think so, we will make it next week, if you are going to leave any earlier let me know

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:50 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I probably won't be able to leave until 4. I'm sure you'll be gone by then.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:49 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

im not sure yet, let me know what you are doing

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:48 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

When are you leaving today?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:48 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i hope you can figure it out, let me know if you need help

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:47 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I wish! I've been sitting here trying to figure out how I can see you today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:45 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

is it next week yet

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:44 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Well then I guess I'm going to have to wear them more often.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:42 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:

i like the glasses


Please put my name on the list to attend this forum on Wednesday, January
26.  Thanks.


Don, I have left a message for Michael to call - I am waiting.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/EES on 03/12/2001 03:15 PM ---------------------------

Don Miller@ECT
03/12/2001 10:53 AM
To:	David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	Cinergy

Dave,

Quick update.

It appears Art is on vacation all week.  He is obviously not too concerned about the issue.  I am still waiting to hear back from David Tang to see if they want one of their guys to go to the plant tomorrow.

We could/should get FERC approval any day.  This is the last real CP for this deal.

Let me know if you and Cyrus hook up.

Thanks,

Don


let s try to set up that weekend.


Kevin/Karin:

My understanding from Vince is that London is reponsible for the expenses
incurred while their people are here for training, as well as for any of our
people that go to London at their request.

It should be easy for them to expense this airfare for Steve from their office
and charge it to whatever cost center Tony is going to be under in London.

Shirley

Kevin G Moore
04/03/2001 06:24 AM
To: Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Airfaire for Tony

Please take a look at this e-mail .......
I AM ALSO IN NEED OF INSTRUCTION....

                                                    Thanks
                                                Kevin Moore
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001 06:19
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Karin Ahamer @ ENRON                           04/03/2001 05:15 AM

To: Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tony Hamilton/EU/Enron@Enron, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tani
Nath/LON/ECT@ECT, Steve Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Airfaire for Tony

Kevin

With regards to Tony's airfare ticket, which has been put onto Steve Leppards
credit card as Tony hasn't got an Amex yet, could you please let me know who
is responsible for payment?  I guess it is your costcentre, if so please
supply me with the number.

Thanks

Karin


Hello:
I am John Arnold.  I believe you're looking for Jeff Arnold.

pfse@dynegy.com on 09/27/2000 05:30:27 PM
To: Jeff.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Evening

jeff,

thanks for the directions - i have already forwarded them home.

tonight is not good for me but perhaps one day we will finally connect now
that
we are closer!

i've been thinking about sunday and hope you have a deck of cards to play with
(perhaps 2 decks of uno cards).


You have received this email because the requester specified you as their Manager. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000038057&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000038057
Request Create Date : 5/31/01 4:11:15 PM
Requested For       : brad.mckay@enron.com
Resource Name       : VPN/IPASS
Resource Type       : Applications


I added these days to #483894.

d

Aimee Lannou   11/13/2000 11:54 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meter 1601

Daren - meter 1601 has flow from 11/8-11/10.  There is no deal for these
days.  Last deal used was for Oct. - 413538, counterparty Southern Union.
Will you let me know if you set a deal up for this?

Thanks.

Aimee


you got it, you still employed?

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Minniece Joe
Subject: HEY

GOT YOUR MESSAGE AND HEAR YOUR COMING INTO TOWN. LET ME KNOW WHAT YOUR PLANS
ARE. BELOW ARE MY NUMBERS SO YOU DONT FORGET TO CALL. CALL MY CELL, ITS
ALWAYS ON. ALSO MY HOME EMAIL ADDRESS FOR FUTURE REFERENCE.

HM 713-993-7171
CELL 713-408-7962
WRK 713-853-9636

JPARKS1@HOUSTON.RR.COM

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Tana,

I would appreciate it if you could facilitate this document through the
required processes.  lelsie just needs to review the changes that London made
and email her acceptance of the changes to Denis O'Connell in London

Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Sage/LON/ECT on 16/11/2000 16:08
---------------------------

Richard Sage
15/11/2000 13:09
To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: i2 MOU

Leslie,
Craig Chaney tells me that you have been looking at these documents.
They need to be signed in the UK for tax reasons.
Can you therefore send confirmation to Denis that you are happy with them so
he can initial them and I will then get them signed.

Many thanks,
Richard

The only changes I have made here are:

Announcements
Any announcement made related to this agreement must be approved in advance
in writing by both parties.

Information Sharing
? Given authorization from the individual marketplace participant, i2 may at
a minimum provide the following information for all individual marketplace
participants that view EnronCredit.com information:
d First and last name
d Company name
d Job title
d Email address
d Business address
- Telephone number


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 18:03:03 -0600
From: "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
To: "Justin Long" <jlong@bracepatt.com>, "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>
Cc: "Aryeh Fishman" <afishman@bracepatt.com>, "Andrea Settanni"
<asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>,
"Kimberly Curry" <kcurry@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll"
<rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject: CalEnergy to sell on open market
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline

FYI - an interesting development.

CalEnergy to sell on open market

By Myra P. Saefong, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 6:17 PM ET Mar 22, 2001

EL CENTRO, Calif. (CBS.MW) -- An independent power producer won the right
Thursday to sell its electricity on the open market, despite contracts
obliging it to sell the energy to Edison International's cash-strapped
utility unit.

A judge in an Imperial County Superior Court Thursday ruled that CalEnergy, a
subsidiary of privately held MidAmerican Energy, should be allowed to sell
its electricity on the open market, Vince Signorotti, a spokesman for the
company, said Thursday afternoon.

As a result of the ruling, CalEnergy stopped supplying power to Southern
California Edison at 1 p.m. Pacific time Thursday and has been selling it to
entities that will pay for it since then, David Sokol, CEO of CalEnergy said
during a conference call.

"We're very pleased with his ruling," Signorotti said, emphasizing that the
ruling is a "short-term solution" but means that CalEnergy will be able to
keep its plants operating, pay its taxes, vendors, employees and landowners.

Even more importantly, Signorotti said, the move keeps the "environmentally
renewable resource flowing into the California market."

"It is absolutely our intention that the power stay in the state," Sokol
said. However, he recognized that the power buyers are not obliged to keep it
within the state.

The sale to third parties could mean that California and its near-bankrupt
utilities will pay even higher prices for electricity.

Southern California Edison (EIX: news, msgs, alerts) owes the generator $140
million from Nov. 1 of last year to date, Signorotti said.

The current ruling doesn't address the issue of past payments. The court case
on other issues continues on, Sokol said.

The utility is unable to make certain payments to creditors because, along
with Pacific Gas & Electric (PCG: news, msgs, alerts) , it has run up
billions of dollars in undercollected costs -- the difference between what
they paid on the wholesale spot market for electricity and what they received
from customers under state-capped retail rates.

"We think the ruling probably has significant implications for the entire QF
(small independent generator) community," Sokol said.

"There's a lot of other QFs that have not taken this action to date," he
said. "Now I think there is an argument that they can obviously mitigate
(damages caused by non-payment) based upon this ruling given the statement of
basically common law in California."

Myra P. Saefong is a reporter for CBS.MarketWatch.com in San Francisco.


Please send out the attached memo that Julia prepared.  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001 05:56 PM -----

	Julia Murray@ENRON
	Sent by: Carolyn George@ENRON
	03/28/2001 10:06 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Unanimous Consents of Directors

Mark,

Attached per your request and for your review is a draft memo to EWS Legal
regarding limiting use of Unanimous Consents of Directors.

I am researching the question regarding the use of stamps for signatures and
will follow up with you shortly.

Julia Heintz Murray
Enron Wholesale Services
Enron Industrial Markets LLC
1400 Smith Street, EB3838
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-4794
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
julia.murray@enron.com


just a little propaganda.  some of this might be old, but it's still fun to
read.

---------------------- Forwarded by Craig J. Dean/Southwest/AUDIT/EYLLP/US on
08/24/2000 09:47 AM ---------------------------
From: Randy A. Hyzak on 08/17/2000 11:22 AM
AABS / Audit
Phone Number: (214) 969-8653
Cell Phone: (214) 289-5840       EYComm: 3274992

To: Craig J. Dean/Southwest/AUDIT/EYLLP/US@EY-NAmerica, Ryan
Shultz/Southwest/AUDIT/EYLLP/US@EY-NAmerica
cc:
Subject: FW: williams and BJ

Thought you boys may enjoy!
---------------------- Forwarded by Randy A. Hyzak/Southwest/AUDIT/EYLLP/US
on 08/17/2000 11:22 AM ---------------------------

dhyzak@quantaservices.com on 08/17/2000 10:38:51 AM

To: Randy A. Hyzak/Southwest/AUDIT/EYLLP/US@EY-NAmerica,
ghyzak@ashford.com@Internet
cc:
Subject: FW: williams and BJ

-----Original Message-----
From:  Martin, Shannon
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 10:31 AM
To: Andy Michel (E-mail); Barry Goss (E-mail); Chris Cole (E-mail);
Dwayne Hyzak; Fritz Boehm (E-mail); Jason Kroll (E-mail); Jeff Deatsman
(E-mail); Jess Morris (E-mail); Kendall Bowlin (E-mail); Kristi Fenton
(E-mail); Mik Hogan (E-mail); Ray Cole (E-mail)
Subject: FW: williams and BJ

 <<att1.unk>>  <<ATT05881.txt>>

Shannon Martin
wk. (713) 985-6424
c.    (713) 857-0392
Quanta Services, Inc. (NYSE: PWR)
1360 Post Oak Blvd., St. 2100
Houston, Tx. 77027

-----Original Message-----
From: Pradeep.Rao@chase.com [mailto:Pradeep.Rao@chase.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 10:38 AM
To: sachin.menon@us.cgeyc.com; anil.advani@ey.com;
westley.s.stockton@us.arthurandersen.com;
joel.w.hermes@us.arthurandersen.com; jdurham@minutemaid.com;
cerones@yahoo.com; smartin@quantaservices.com; dhyzak@quantaservices.com;
Don.Bleasdell@smedica.com; pobrien@quantaservices.com
Subject: FW: williams and BJ

Don't tell me this doesn't get you excited.....true or not........more
likely
than not........dammit, i hate waiting.....at least I get to see him
FRIDAY!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Pradeep Rao/CHASE on 08/16/2000 10:36 AM
---------------------------

c.sean.muller@us.arthurandersen.com on 08/16/2000 11:28:13 AM

 To: robert.a.hawkins@us.arthurandersen.com,
 jonathan.c.grahmann@us.arthurandersen.com, Pradeep
 Rao/CHASE@CHASE, b_mortee@hotmail.com,
 david.n.sanders@us.arthurandersen.com

 cc:

 Subject: FW: williams and BJ

from a friend in Austin....
The uncut version.

i went to both the am and the pm practices yesterday, and let me
re-re-re-iterate that we have a great group of receivers and that the stud
dog bad ass mofo of the group is roy williams.  he is physically way beyond
not only vasher and the walkon CBs trying to cover him, but the rest of the
college ranks.  ahmad brooks was standing by him in street clothes, and
there ain't a chance he could stop roy.  roy flies past people and gets way
the fuck up there and takes the ball out of the clouds.  he's a fucking
randy moss, but you know what?  he's bigger than randy moss and as fast as
randy moss and probably has as good a vertical as randy moss:

Moss
height: 6'4"
weight:  198 lbs.
40 speed: 4.3
vertical: ?

Roy
height: 6'5"
weight: 210 lbs.
40 speed: 4.3
100 speed: 10.38
high jump: 6'10"
long jump: 24'

we may just have the next superhuman WR on our team.  pray for no injuries.
i'm going to the pm practice today, too.  got a hard-on just thinking about
roy.  probably will see a few NFL GMs there.

and the other WRs are spectacular, too.  sloan is 6'2" and does well at
establishing and holding position vs. the cover man.  BJ is 6'1" and has
really soft hands.  i watched BJ, vasher and jeffrey field 12-15 punts each
at 60 yds with a cross wind in the pm session.  vasher and jeffrey had
technical problems and bobbled or dropped almost half.  BJ never bobbled or
dropped one.  as soon as it's close, he just sucks it in and takes off.  and
that's how he catches balls on the crossing routes.  vacuum hands.

it's going to be unfuckingreal a year or two down the road when these guys
have experience and simms gets to throw to them on the field three at a
time.  you can't doubleteam them all.

put simply, i think the days of our using white 5'7" WRs are over.

******************************************************************************
*
Note:          The information contained in this message may be privileged
and confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible
for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and
deleting it from your computer.  Thank you.  Ernst & Young LLP
******************************************************************************
*
 - att1.unk
 - ATT05881.txt