Remarkably clear explanation.

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           09/20/2000 06:48 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: LM6000 Title Transfer Question

FYI, see below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000 06:43 PM
---------------------------

Matthew Tezyk@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/20/2000 06:13 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby@ECT
cc: Dan Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: LM6000 Title Transfer Question

Ben,

Does ENA wish to accept Title of 14 LM6000's on September 26, 2000, or accept
Title of these Units after each has been issued an Inspection Acceptance
Certificate from EECC QA/QC department?

The following is a summary of the LM6000 Title Transfer Question:

Mike Storm, GE/SSEP Project Manager, requested from me, on 9/19/00, to accept
title of 14 LM6000's no later 9/26/00.  I informed him I was not authorized
to make this decision and that I would contact the Owner to make the
decision.  I further informed Mike Storm that our Owner would not accept
those terms and a compromise must be worked out.
Contract Reference 15.2.1 of contract 24-LM6K-2-99 states: title transfers
when equipment is ready to ship to the delivery point and seller notifies
purchaser of such event.
Delivery Point is defined as the SSEP storage yard.
SSEP has notified us that Units #1-14 are "Ready to Ship".
Contract Reference 10.2.3 of contract 24-LM6K-2-99 states: purchaser has the
right to inspect the equipment for "completeness prior to loading on
transport to delivery point".
We have inspected the first eleven Units and have informed SSEP that Units
#1-14 ARE NOT COMPLETE and therefore are NOT at the Delivery Point.
FACT: Units # 1-11 are at the delivery point. #12-14 are at SSEP.
FACT: If we sent a truck to SSEP tomorrow, NONE of the UNITS would be "Ready
to Ship" to a project site.
FACT: SSEP QA/QC has 15 Non Conformance Reports on these 14 turbines which
need to be corrected before they are "Ready to Ship".
It is in the best interests for both companies to correct the Non
Conformance's prior to shipment to the delivery point or project site.
RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that we DO NOT accept Title until the Units are
actually ready to be shipped to a project site.  The problem is that NONE OF
THE UNITS ARE READY TO SHIP!  SSEP has to work off punchlist items which
their QA/QC department has listed on Non Conformance Reports.  At this
juncture, no money can be withheld from SSEP. To ensure they will be fixed,
Title should transfer after our QA/QC inspectors give written notice that
each Unit is complete and ready to ship.  This will protect ENA on the
quality of the machines, as well as, ensure that little or no "re-work" is
performed in the field.

If you require further information or any assistance in this matter, please
feel free to contact me at 713-646-8258.

Matthew Tezyk
Project Manager


Amanda,

Yes, it appears that the link you set up works properly, however, I have a
slight change.  Please modify the title to read "WSCC Plant Outages
(portlant)".  Also add the WSCC to the description.  In addition, please add
an additional link under the Power tab called, "Cal Plant Outages (Cal ISO)",
with a description of "Daily plant outages posted on the web by the
California ISO."  The file will be called "ISO curtailments.xls".  Thanks.

Mat


Your Offered Servcie is setup on Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation.

Service Class - Transportation
Pathed
Rate Schedule:  FTA-R
Firm

Any problems, please call me.

Marlene D. Hilliard


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2000
08:40 AM ---------------------------

Pinnamaneni Krishnarao
02/22/2000 01:10 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: News article on Enron

  India: Enron aftermath

   Business Line - 02/21/2000

   Abhay Mehta

   Copyright (C) 2000 Kasturi & Sons Ltd (KSL); Source: World Reporter (TM) -
Asia Intelligence Wire

   Power Play

   A Study of the Enron Project

   * Publishers: Orient Longman, New Delhi * Price: Rs. 195

   THE Enron power project at Dabhol in Ratnagiri district of Maharashtra has
been mired in nationwide controversy ever since the
   inception of the project proposal in 1992; and the sordid tale ends only
in 1997, with the Supreme Court of India refusing to even
   admit an appeal against the Bombay High Court decision, of December 1996,
which while commenting that "This case has
   highlighted to the people as to how even after 50 years of Independence,
political considerations outweigh the public interest and
   the interest of the State and to what extent the Government can go to
justify its actions not only before the public but even before
   the courts of law" - yet dismissed a public interest petition against the
project on the (purely technical) ground of res judicata, even
   though new facts, new arguments, new evidence of the violation of the laws
of the land had been advanced by the petitioners.

   The fact that the fresh violations of the law were not even considered and
recorded, despite the petitioners adducing the required
   evidence, can only be termed as strange, perhaps bizarre.

   Abhay Mehta's simple, factual documentation - in fact a chronological
narration - of all events, including the process of bending all
   rules, of subverting the law for promoting a project involving
unparalleled future liabilities for Maharashtra, indeed for the whole of
   India - is not only masterly, it is devastating.

   It is a short, pithy book which deserves to be read from cover to cover by
all thinking citizens of this country. Barring the
   concluding chapter, the epilogue, there are no personal comments, only
facts, disseminated from the original papers, mostly 'secret'
   documents.

   All documentation has been carefully, faithfully recorded, including
extracts from supposedly 'top secret' minutes of cabinet
   committee meetings; and the specific violations of the law (which were
opposed by a few public spirited civil servants, much to
   their disadvantage) have been pointed up. Apart from an introductory
'Primer on Electricity' - introduced for the benefit of the
   layman, explaining some technical issues relating to electricity
generation, transmission and distribution - and the background of the
   events of 1991, the foreign exchange crisis, and the aftermath of the
crisis, the other fifteen chapters, three appendices and fourteen
   annexes of the small book (of 226 pages) packs in an enormous volume of
factual information. The strange saga of the Enron
   project, and the sheer magnitude of the future problems this one single
project poses for the country, need to be briefly recounted
   here, for essentially, it is the coming generation which would have to
face the problem.

   The MSEB has contracted to buy - and if not used, to pay for - 2000 MW of
electricity (for a period of 20 years) from the
   Dabhol Power Company (the legal entity set up by Enron, as an unlimited
liability company registered in India, through a maze of
   intricate crossholdings of equity by half a dozen or more 'front'
companies registered in various tax-free havens.

   Abhay Mehta has indicated the total payments to Enron over 20 years amount
to $ 35 billion (at 1998 exchange rates, around Rs.
   1,25,000 crores) over the life of the project. One must record that: (a)
crude oil/oil product prices have as of writing, more than
   doubled since the above calculations were made. A per the 'doctored'
figures presented by the company (and its advocate), the
   charge per unit of electricity supplied, at the 1998 level of prices, was
to 4.39 cent (per unit) as 'capacity charge' and 3.43 cents
   (per unit) for 'energy costs'.

   The former is indexed to the US inflation rate, and the latter to
international fuel prices. The former may be assumed to have gone
   up only marginally (rounded to 4.4 cents per unit); we know that fuel
prices have more than doubled internationally over 1999.
   Assuming the 'fuel costs' to have increased less than 100 per cent - even
though international prices have more than doubled - we
   may assume (for 1999) energy costs of 6.85 cents per units, making for a
total payment of 11.25 US cents per unit of electricity
   supplied by the Dabhol Power Company (DPC) to MSEB in late 1999, in Phase
I of the project.

   Within another two years, at 2000 MW, the annual offtake (for 365 days X
24 hours/day) would be 17.52 billion KWH; and at
   11.25 cents per unit, the total payment amounts to $1.97 billion annually;
for 20 years, this workout to $ 39.4 billion.

   This is not counting any further inflation in either energy costs or
capacity charge. At today's exchange rate - about Rs.43.5 per US
   dollar - in rupee terms this works out to wore than Rs. 175,000 crores (as
compared to Rs. 125,000 crores indicated by Abhay
   Mehta). This is the cost to MSEB in rupee; and to the country in foreign
exchange as payment to just one project authority, for
   supply of part of the power required in Maharashtra.

   The really significant point to note in this connection is that this
payment - and considerably more, depending on (a) future increase
   in'capacity charges' depending on US inflation rate, and international
prices of LNGaphtha (for 'fuel costs'), and (b) depreciation of
   the exchange rate of the rupee vis-a-vis the US dollar - is obligatory;
the assets of the MSEB, the Maharashtra government
   indeed, all assets of the Government of India (present and future) are
mortgaged to Enron, by way of sovereign guarantees
   extended by both governments.

   The other significant point in this connection is that - as predicted by
all independent Indian experts as well as the World Bank -the
   Enron project he forced the MSEB to cut its offtake of Tata Electric
Company's and its own much cheaper thermal power
   already; in a postscript dated August 1999, Abhay Mehta has indicated that
already, the MSEB had stopped buying between 200
   and 250 MW of power from Tata Electric (available at Rs. 1.80 per unit)
and has had to backdown its own Chandrapur thermal
   power station (cost of this power being Rs. 1.20 per unit), while forced
to buy more expensive Enron power at Rs. 5 per unit.

   The loss to MSEB on this count alone comes to Rs. 460 crore per year.

   This had in fact, been predicted earlier even by the World Bank.

   It is pointless here to go into the details of how precisely all this was
contrived, by a deliberate campaign of 'disinformation', of
   blatant lies, of sidelining of expert opinion, not only of independent
experts but also the GOI's own official advisers in this matter,
   namely, the Central Electricity Authority as well as that of the World
Bank, which was resolutely opposed to this project. The
   detailed facts, the letters exchanged in the above context, the pressure
tactics adopted, the flouting of all procedures norms, even
   statutory provisions of the Electricity (Supply) Act, are all carefully
documented by Abhay Mehta.

   Mehta correctly concludes: "We frequently blame external agencies - like
the World Bank - for all our problems, when, as a
   matter of fact, we ourselves are our own worst enemies. In the instant
case, the World Bank not only advised the Government of
   India against the project, it stood resolutely firm in its assessment of
the total inadvisability of this project. In fact, one must note
   here that in 1996, neighbouring Pakistan, which had entered into a
somewhat similar MoU with Enron, cancelled the project (and
   the Power Purchase Agreement with Enron), for a $ 670 million, 782 MW
residual oil-fuelled power plant, even though that
   Agreement had stipulated Enron power supply at a fixed rate of 6.4 US
cents per KWH over a 30 year period. (Note the
   estimated rate of 11.25 cents per KWH for Dabhol power for the MSEB in
December 1999, which works out to around Rs. 5
   per unit).

   One could go on; but one must leave the reader to go through Abhay Mehta's
crisp, factual, matter of fact narration of the Enron
   saga, and switch over to the point made by him in the epilogue to the
story, about 'The Next Round of Scams'.

   For quite some time, the ruling elite in India has been intent on
'privatising' all public enterprises; and even 'utilities' are no
   exception. The 'unbundling' of infrastructure with a view to privatisation
of all the 'profitable' segments. All this - as per the current
   'disinformation campaign' - is supposedly in the interest of
rationalisation and greater efficiency of poorer supply.

   The author has referred in this context to the acquisition from the
Government - by the Torrent Group - of the Ahmedabad and
   Surat Electricity companies at less than one-tenth of the market value of
the assets of thee facilities. Again, much like the Enron
   saga, all objections by the Finance Department of the Gujarat government
were overruled.

   And, Abhay Mehta has predicated that this onslaught - the break-up of
power utilities into three segments, generation, transmission
   and distribution, - with a view to their privatisation is likely to be the
new thrust by the ruling elite, for reasons that do not require to
   be spelt out.

   Though Mehta had the examples of the Torrent Group takeover of Ahmedabad
and Surat Electricity companies, and of the break
   up of the Orissa State Electricity Board before him, yet his statement can
be stated today to be prophetic; the UPSEB is now on
   the firing line. The recent strike by the workers and engineers of the
UPSEB in protest of the announced UP government decision
   to trifurcate the UPSEB; and the Union Minister of Power, Mr. Rangarajan
Kumaramangalam's statement that the UPSEB is a
   loss making, inefficient unit and that privatisation of the facilities
after the trifurcation - need to be noted.

   That 40 per cent of the dues of the UPSEB are from the UP Government; that
tariffs for UP electricity supply are fixed by the UP
   government and not by the UPSEB; that the UPSEB does not have the cash
even for routine maintenance as a result of the above
   - these are facts that nobody is prepared even to consider. That the
remedy for UPSEB lies in a different kind of reform and
   restructuring, is not even to be debated. The whole idea is to privatise
the profitable segments, and to leave the public sector entity
   with all the problem areas, including rural energy supply. It is against
this background that Abhay Mehta's book needs to be widely
   disseminated, read, and its implications understood.

   What is at stake is not a 'utility' here or a PSU there. What is at stake
is the future of some 80 per cent of the have-nots in this
   country.

   What is at stake is the 'pillory' of the assets of the nation for private
aggrandisement.

   Arun Ghosh


Jim,

Attached for your review is the Letter Agreement with CPS for the additional
work and materials relating to the Interconnect in Karnes County, Texas.  If
this is satisfactory, please let me know and I'll print up executables.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Oops!!  I have a meeting at 11am.  I will not be able to attend.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Marron, Julissa
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:32 PM
To:	Ancrum, Cherie; Calvin, Juantongia; Coleman, Tandra; Connett, Rhonda; Davis, Dana; Ducros, Fatimah; Ebow, Amber; Escamilla, Albert; Everett, Donna; Green, Tracey; Hare, Bill D.; Harris, Weltonia; Harrison, John Howard; Johnson, Cheryl; King, Gretchen; Kyser, Ruby; Lebeau, Maria; Moore, Jason; Mordi, Gloria; Muniz, Margaret; Murdock, Chauncey; Newberger, Dale ; Otegbola, Remi; Perry, Warren; Rodriguez, Bernice; Schott, Samuel; Strickland, Connie; Sweeten, Linda; Valderrama, Tanya; Wagner, Jennifer; Woods, Lisa
Subject:	Thanksgiving Luncheon...
Importance:	High

Hello everyone -

Listed are the people that are available to drive tomorrow:

Albert (4)
Maria (4)
Tandra (2)
Julissa (4) - I have a full car.

If you are intending on going and do not have a vehicle, please get with a driver before tomorrow so that we can leave @ 11:00 am.

Thank you,

Julissa Marron


Ooooo-k-aaaaaaay!  If nobody else steps up and asks for them, I'll keep the
report in our files.....................as long as I have file space.  One of
these days, they're going to move us into a tiny space like you guys have and
then we'll be reduced to getting barely legible copies off RIMS!

John Hodge@ENRON
02/28/2001 03:37 PM
To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Gulfstream Maps

Sounds like something we should keep,
but..........................................................with my physical
space limited to something less than the preceding dots, I'm not sure I have
anywhere to put the maps.

	From:  Rebecca W Cantrell @ ECT                           02/28/2001 02:39 PM

To: John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy
Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gil Muhl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Gulfstream Maps

Do you know anyone who would like or need detailed maps from the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for Gulfstream?  I typically don't keep
environmental information for projects because it takes up so much room and
nobody ever asks for it.  However, this does have facility location maps of
the project and various alternatives.  The full system is broken down into
121 topographic maps, so it's very detailed.  This may not be the final
routing, but it will be pretty close.

First come, first served.  I only have one volume.


2:30 conf. call

Jennifer Burns
Executive Assistant to Jeff Shankman
Enron Global Markets, LLC

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Laura Craft [mailto:lcraft@opt4.com]
Sent:	Friday, November  16, 2001 2:37 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Cc:	Burns, Jennifer
Subject:	Opt4 demo

Jeff:  I am glad we were able to reschedule our discussion about Opt4, including demo of its product.  We are set for this Monday November 19 at 2:30 your time. I will call you at your office number.  We will be broadcasting the demo to you over web-ex.  To log in to the demo just :
1.	Go to the web-ex site (www.webex.com)
2.	At the first screen, click the button "Meet on Line" in the upper right corner of the screen.
3.	On the second screen, click the blue "Join Meeting"  button on the left, middle section of the screen.
4.	On the third screen enter the Meeting number in the box at the top of the page.  The meeting number is 43248761. Then click "Join"

I'll look forward to speaking to you Monday.


When is your next Friday off?


Aimee:

I need a desk to desk deal set up at meter 378 for February 2000.  It is an
ENA sale (delivery) on the 202 contract and an HPL buy (receipt) on the HPL
216 contract.  This is a very high priority because the bridge will close
today.  If possible would you have this completed by Noon today?

Thanks,

Fred


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/26/2001 09:28
AM ---------------------------

"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM> on 03/26/2001 09:21:44 AM
To: jader@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FuelCell

Kay & Jeff:  I assume that you saw this, but just in case you did not.

News that a Connecticut agency plans to install twelve fuel
cell units around the state sent the stock of FuelCell Energy up
nearly 20 percent Friday, reports Reuters. Lehman analysts
described it as the "largest fuel cell commercialization effort
anywhere in the U.S. to date" (Reuters, Mar. 23).

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212
424-8125.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
jklauber@llgm.com


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/15/2001 08:15 AM -----

	Joseph Alamo
	02/14/2001 11:50 AM

		 To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
		 cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Sac Bee, Tues 2/13 Editorial: "Lawmakers failed to respond to
energy alarm"

---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 09:48
AM ---------------------------

	Joseph Alamo
	02/13/2001 04:57 PM

To: Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Sac Bee, Tues 2/13 Editorial: "Lawmakers failed to respond to energy
alarm"

Lawmakers failed to respond to energy alarm

(Published Feb. 13, 2001)

Now that state lawmakers have begun an inquiry to determine what caused
California's energy crisis, they might want to take a look in the mirror.
Not at the infamous 1996 vote that triggered the partial deregulation of the
electricity industry. The remains of that law have been picked over enough.
Besides, most of the people who voted for it have already left the
Legislature, thanks to term limits.
But there was another vote last June, far less heralded and still little
known. It came just as warning bells were starting to signal the onset of
what has since become a crippling crisis. The Legislature not only ignored
those alarms, it stood in the way of the people who were trying to respond.
Why it did so remains something of a mystery. How it did so says a lot about
the way the Legislature works.
At issue was the now-defunct California Power Exchange. This was a
state-mandated auction, until recently the only place that utilities were
allowed to shop for the electricity that lights our homes and businesses. By
last June there were ominous signs that the power exchange, known as the PX,
wasn't working right. Prices were higher than anyone expected. The supply of
energy seemed thinner than was reasonable. There were enormous overhead
costs.
The power exchange was a bit like having a single automobile auction where
everyone who wanted to buy or sell a car had to do business. In times of
surplus this might work, because the sellers would underbid each other to
unload their cars to reluctant buyers. But in a shortage, the opposite would
be true. Buyers, with no place else to go, would pay ever-higher prices to
get what they needed. That's what was happening with electricity.
A majority of the Public Utilities Commission decided to do something about
it. The PUC voted 3-2 to allow privately formed exchanges to compete with the
state-sanctioned auction. At least two private exchanges were promising to
deliver more power at lower prices with fewer administrative costs. The
commission wanted to let them give it a try.
But before the PUC could even implement the change, the Legislature
intervened. Acting with unusual speed, lawmakers overturned the commission's
decision.
Assembly Bill 2866 was a classic legislative bill, in the worst sense. A
cobbled-together collection of 28 unrelated items, it was drafted in a hurry
as a companion to the new state budget. One of the bill's many parts was a
provision to subsidize California's film industry. That got a lot of
attention. The paragraph overturning the PUC's attempt to head off the energy
crisis got next to none. The bill was amended in the Senate on June 15 and
approved later that day. The Assembly passed it the next day, and Gov. Gray
Davis signed it.
The analysis of the bill that members saw in the Assembly was cryptic and
misleading. It said the bill would authorize the PUC to study the idea of
allowing competition for the state-mandated exchange. That was true as far as
it went. But the analysis omitted the fact that the bill's real intent was
just the opposite: to reverse a PUC decision and prohibit competing exchanges
for at least a year.
"California had made a big investment in the power exchange," said Sen. Jim
Brulte, R-Rancho Cucamonga, who was one of probably just a handful of
legislators who knew about the provision before it became law. "The PUC
decision would have put that investment at risk." Which is another way of
saying that the power exchange wasn't working and had to be protected from
competition.
Richard Bilas, the PUC commissioner who was pushing the hardest for the
reform the Legislature overturned, said he never liked the idea of mandating
a single exchange in which the utilities would have to buy all their power.
Bilas wasn't a member of the commission when the PUC restructured
California's electricity industry. But he said the result reminded him of the
former Soviet Union, where leaders declared that they were going to move to a
market economy and then appointed a group of central planners to figure out
how those markets should function.
"Markets are not based on fictitious or created exchanges," he said. "Markets
are based on buyers and sellers coming face to face to negotiate a deal. You
don't establish beforehand something that may not be necessary."
It's still not clear whether opening up the markets would have prevented the
price spikes that have since nearly bankrupted the utilities, forcing the
state to step in and buy electricity to keep the lights on. It might be a
stretch to suggest that any single policy change could have prevented the
crisis. But we will never know.
The Legislature, acting in haste and with little information, kept us from
finding out. The California Power Exchange, which the Legislature was so
eager to protect from competition, collapsed of its own weight anyway, and is
now out of business.
The law preventing other exchanges from entering the market was quietly
repealed two weeks ago, seven very long months after it was adopted.


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Enron Global Markets - Coal and Emissions Trading
The first Enron Online synfuel trade occurred this past week, establishing EnronOnline as the only online marketplace for synfuel.  The purpose of bringing synfuel on EnronOnline is to provide market transparency between the coal/synfuel spread.

The coal cash book, which began trading only two months ago, has traded over 2 million spot tons.  The fundamental purpose of this book is to capture short term market discrepancies, while also adding liquidity to the spot market to further long term trading and marketing of coal.

Enron Energy and Operational Services - ENA Solid Fuel Initiative
ENA started development of a Coal Initiative late last year to support the electricity trading desk and to provide Enron with a hedge in the event that the cost of natural gas continues to escalate above current long term projections.  Because of the culture shock associated the use of the words  'Enron' and 'coal' in the same sentence, consideration was been given to changing the name to DNG (Dense Natural Gas); however, we went with Solid Fuel Initiative.

This initiative is developing multiple sites throughout the country where ENA feels there is the greatest opportunity for long term corporate benefit.  The primary areas are Texas, Florida, southeastern Ohio and the central Rocky Mountain Area.  There are 2 principal areas currently being aggressively pursued:  Brownsville, TX and Brighton FL.  In Brownsville, the Team secured formal Owner approval to lease a 600 acre site near the Brownsville Ship Channel.  This approval will allow the formal permitting activities to proceed without delay.

A 500 MW facility is being considered for Brownsville.  As conceptualized, it will consist of two - 250 MW (net) CFB units (Circulating Fluidized Bed) Boilers. The boilers will be fired by petroleum coke (petcoke) and use a technology that will generate electricity in the most environmentally friendly way currently possible.  One of the advantages of locating this facility near Brownsville is that it remains a steady growth area and there is already serious interest by others to take substantial initial base load capacity.  There is further synergy with other developing projects in the area that could lock down additional base capacity.  As stated the plant is initially 500 MW, but will be designed to be expanded to a 1000 MW facility.

The EEOS team is starting to grow and currently includes Hilda Akin & Cheryl Kent, Project Admin Assistants, Bill Fox as PEM, and Paula Solomon as PCM.  As the project develops there will be more team members required.  In addition, as the Florida opportunity develops we plan to establish a separate team.

eSource
eSource, Enron's research group, recently posted on its website a Forrester report as well as analyst reports for various industry and companies.  These reports are free and available to all Enron employees on the eSource Hot Topics page at http://esource.enron.com/hot_topics.asp <http://esource.enron.com/hot_topics.asp>.  To date, over 1,600 employees have downloaded "Spending Wisely on Private Hubs", a report valued at $2,000.  Over 1,100 employees to date have viewed the analyst reports, provided by Investext.  The reports, which are updated continuously, are presented in folders by company and industry.  New folders are being added upon request.  To submit a suggestion for a new folder, please complete the suggestion form at http://esource.enron.com/suggestion.asp <http://esource.enron.com/suggestion.asp>.

Watch for the new eSource bulletin, The Source.  It will feature frequently requested searches, tips on finding information, new products, services, and events.

Meanwhile, to further fulfill Enron's information needs, eSource has arranged for analysts and bureau chiefs of various organizations and publishing houses to offer seminars to Enron employees.

Enron Freight Markets
EFM signed a firm contract with Streamline Shippers Association last week to provide truckload capacity for one-year with EFM's option to extend the contract for up to an additional year.  Streamline transloads international shipments that enter the U.S. through the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles.  Streamline then consolidates the shipments into full truckloads destined to the major population centers throughout the country.  EFM will begin moving shipments to northeast destinations this week.

IN THE NEWS

We are pleased to announce that Sally Beck has been named Chief Operating Officer for Enron Net Works.  She will join Greg Piper, President and Chief Executive Officer and Mark Pickering, Chief Technology Officer in the Enron Net Works Office of the Chair.

In her current role as Managing Director for Enron Net Works, Sally heads up Enron's Global Risk Management Operations.  She brings more than 20 years professional experience to Enron, joining the Company in 1992.  She graduated from the University of Texas at Austin with a B.B.A. in Marketing and an MBA with a concentration in Finance.

WELCOME
New Hires
EGM  - Robert Bogucki, Adam Gianonne
EIM   - Sylvia Miller
ENA  - Theresa McBride, Sriram Vasudevan, Jonathan McKay

Transfers (to or within)
ENA -Brandon Cavazos
EGM - Michael Garcia

NUGGETS & NOTES

Congratulations to Rahul Kumar for passing the CFA Level III Exam.

Weather Risk Management
The weather group is pleased to welcome several new people to their group.  Trevor Nathan and Norm Trethewey have joined the Australia office and Kaoru Hijikata has joined the Tokyo office. Please welcome them to our team.

EnronOnline Figures

Below are the latest figures for EnronOnline as of September 7

	?       Total Life to Date Transactions > 1,420,000
	?       Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $809 billion

Enron Best Practice Tips
United Parcel Service (UPS) Delivers the Following Air Products:
UPS Next Day Air Early A.M. - 8:30 a.m. to selected zip codes
UPS Next Day Air - guaranteed by 10:30 a.m.
UPS Next Day Air Saver - guaranteed by 3:00 p.m.
UPS 2nd Day Air AM - guaranteed by 12:00 p.m.
UPS 2nd Day Air - guaranteed by end of second day
UPS 3-Day Select - guaranteed by end of third day
UPS International Service - World-wide Express Plus, by 8:30 a.m. to select cities in Europe
UPS World-wide Express - second business day

For questions about selected cities and zip codes, please call the Enron Preferred Customer Associate at 800-432-2877.
UPS is Enron's preferred vendor for express deliveries.

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only and should not be disclosed.

<Embedded Paintbrush Picture>


GADSDEN RESEARCH  SERVICES'

FERCwatch?
?Issued?May?16,?2001
?
ELECTRIC?/  HYDRO?Report:

?
COMMISSION POSTS WESTERN MARKET  ORDERS!
?

Further Order on Removing Obstacles to Increased Energy Supply  and Reduced
Demand in the Western United States and Dismissing Petition for  Rehearing,
EL01-47-000 and EL01-47-001, issued May 16, 2001 [PDF]?

Order Granting Motions for Emergency Relief in Part and Deferring  Action on
Other Aspects of Motions and Proposed Order under Section 210(d)  Directing
Interconnections with Qualifying Facilities and Establishing Further
Procedures, EL00-95-020 et al., issued May 16, 2001 [PDF]

?
_________________________________

?
Potomac Electric Power Company and  Conectiv,?EC01-101-000 (05/14/01) --
Section 203 application for  the merger of PEPCO, an electric utility
operating in the District of Columbia  and Maryland, ?and Conectiv, a public
utility holding company with  subsidiaries providing electric service in
Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey and  Virginia.
DOCUMENT LINK NOT  AVAILABLE
REQUEST A  COPY: ?grs4ferc@starpower.net.
?

?

_________________________________________________________
______________________________
?
NATURAL GAS /  OIL?Report:
?

NO  REPORT

________________________________________
?
[To request a copy of any of the  above listed? filings, please call
202-255-4771 or toll-free,  1-877-544-4771; or send an e-mail
to?grs4ferc@starpower.net)]
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????
?
GRS' FERCwatch e-mail notification is a free courtesy service of Gadsden
Research Services,  energy research and document retrieval specialists.?
Periodically  (generally once or twice weekly), GRS will broadcast FERCwatch
with  descriptions of?major FERC issuances or filings such as rulemakings,
policy  statements, mergers,?new rate filings, major?rate changes, and
certificate filings.
?
GRS can provide hardcopies?of any of  the above listed items at nominal
charges;?for document requests or  estimates of charges, please reply
to?grs4ferc@starpower.net?or call 202.255.4771 (toll free,  1.877.544.4771).
?
For an e-mailed?copy of?a  brochure?of GRS services and rates for FERC and
other federal agency  research please e-mail your request to
grs4ferc@starpower.net.?  For a mailed copy, please include your name, firm
name and street address.? For?a faxed copy, please include your fax  number.
?
The FERCwatch subscription list is  used for the sole purpose of providing
information on FERC and energy industry  activity and will not be sold or
otherwise distributed to any other business or  organization.? For additions
or removal from the FERCwatch  notification list, please reply
to?grs4ferc@starpower.net.
?
Send suggestions on how the GRS' FERCwatch  can better serve the?energy
community to?grs4ferc@starpower.net.


Tana:

The following CPs are not authorized to trade US power -- restricted by
credit:

NG Energy Trading, L.L.C.
RAG American Coal Company
NJR Energy Services Company
CMS Field Services, Inc.
New Jersey Natural Gas Company
*****************************************

Both of the following CPs are authorized to trade all US power products:

FPL Energy Power Marketing, Inc.
Calpine Energy Services, L.P. - same master as Calpine Power Services Corp.

Leslie


We are in the process of confirming that all traders are set up correctly and ready to trade when the system goes live.

We need to make sure that your Stack Managers are accessing the correct database. In order to do this, we need to know how you access Stack Manager:

1) Through Terminal Server (the one that opens up a desktop within a desktop and it actually appears that you have two Start buttons).
or
2) By opening the Stack Manager directly from your "native" desktop.

Please reply to this message with either a corresponding "1" or a "2" in the subject field.

If you're not sure which one you have, please contact myself x39673, Teresa Mandola x39807 or Jennifer McQuade x53614 and we'll come by your desk to help you.

Thank you,

Dan Diamond


Due to the larger than normal volume of activity this month, the preliminary
report was distributed early, on 02/09/01.  This is the FINAL report for
February.   Please note that the changes, since the preliminary report, are
on the "February 01 Changes" tab, and the detail is on the "Feb 2001" tab.
You have received notification on the name changes as they have occurred.

Please find attached the Name Change/Merger Notification Report for
February.   To launch the report, double click on the attachment and select
Enable Macros and Read Only.
Please note that:
 ERMS short names will be changed in GCP and ERMS each Friday at 10am Central
Time, and
 Inactivations will be made on Mar 1
 Please adjust paper size to fit your needs

We have made a few changes to our Name Change/Merger Notification Report - it
now has a new look and a couple of features we hope will assist you.  For
more information, please click below:

Each month now has two sheets, a summary sheet (eg Jan 01 Changes) and a
detailed sheet (eg Jan 01).
Click below for more information:

The summary sheet can be used to view all changes after a certain date.  If
you're aware of all changes up to, say, January 15th enter 01/16/2001 in cell
C6 of the Summary Sheet and click the Sort button in cell H6.  All changes
made to the report on or after January 16th will be listed automatically.
The Summary sheet may also be sorted for certain criteria - use the drop down
arrows alongside the column headers to make your selection.

This sheet contains all the information you are used to seeing, but slightly
reformatted.  Key points are:
In the case of an Inactivation, the cause of the Inactivation (eg Merger) is
listed in the Comments section
As with the previous format,
all months' reports will be sent cumulatively throughout the year
the report will be sent out twice each month, on the 15th and at the end of
the month.

It is our aim to publish the report in Livelink and to send out only the
summary sheet and a URL for the detailed report each month.  This will save a
lot of space in Lotus Notes and we hope it will streamline your monitoring
process.

We'd be very happy to receive any comments you may have.

As always, please contact me at x33103 with any questions or concerns.

Cheryl


Hello:

I am working with  a group of lawyers organized by the Bar Association of
the City of New York to help identify emergency funding sources for small
businesses affected by the World Trade Center attack.  The idea is to help
them secure short term loans and/or grants so that they can stay in business
during this difficult period.  I am able to investigate the various sources
of government funding (SBA, FEMA)  but need your help with finding sources
of private money such as foundations, corporate funds, the September 11th
Fund (?).

My goal is to compile a list of available resources for use during
counseling sessions with business owners.  There are teams of other lawyers
from various firms who have agreed to represent small business owners, on a
pro bono basis, in their effort to complete  paperwork and deal with a
staggering array of other legal matters including insurance, tax, real
estate, employment and immigration issues.

You all share the dubious distinction of being in my rolodex and being
perceived (by me at least) as having the right kind of contacts to help me
find people and organizations to call.  My thought is that you or your
colleagues and friends may be affiliated with a foundation, firm or
corporation that has somehow raised money or made money available for this
purpose.  Feel free to call me with information at 646-428-1814 or email me.
Also feel free to pass this message on to any others who could help.

Thanks, Bill McGovern.


Thanks for the information.  We are using it to try to get a sense of the
increase in demand created by this new generation.  I have cross referenced
some of your info with some info from the power desk.  this info is
attached.  In addition, it would be helpful to get a copy of the maps you
mentioned below.  Please let me know when you can send the maps.

Thanks,

Eric

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  James Whitehead @ ENRON                           04/18/2000 11:51 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: TX IPPS

Here is the information that I have compiled about new IPPs in Texas.  What
exactly are you using this for? I also have ArcView maps of the majority of
all the plant locations with surrounding pipelines. If you have any
information about new IPPs that I do not have I will be very interested.

James
3-9492


This week's Lite Bytz lunchtime presentation will feature the following TOOLZ
speaker:

Deborah Kelly
Microsoft Exchange
Thursday, December 7, 2000

If you have not already signed up, please RSVP via email to Shawn
Calloway/NA/Enron by the end of the day Tuesday, December 5, 2000.

Click below for more details.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/1207liteb.ppt


Cynthia Beeler
402 Rendezvous Dr.
Lafayette, CO 80026
ckbeeler@msn.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Cynthia Beeler


We Agree

"Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com> on 03/20/2001 10:05:59 AM

To:   David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Melissa
      Jones/Texas Utilities@TU, HPL.SCHEDULING@ENRON.COM,
LIZ.BELLAMY@ENRON.COM
cc:
Subject:  NOMS/ACTUAL FLOW FOR 3/19/01

DATE      NOM       MCF       MMBTU
3/19/01        60,000         59,944          61,562

BTU = 1.027


Effective, February, 25, 2000 all of the  (Friday) monthly department
conference calls will be held at 10:30am cst instead of 9:00am cst..   The
call in number of 1-800-283-1805 will remain the same.

I do have a request, with Rick's group increasing in size the number of lines
for my favorite number (1-800-283-1805) is limited.  My request is, within
each office would you please gather as one big happy family and dial into the
call (if/where possible) to help with the number of available lines.  If down
the road I see the need for more lines I will have to change the number.
Also, below is a list of the remaining calls for the year.

Thanks and please don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions.

gngr

Remaining (Friday) calls for 2000 at 10:30am cst
February 25
March 24
April 21
May 19
June 16
July 14
August 11
September 8
October 6
November 3
December 1
December 29


we will have a list of patterns just in case people don't know what they are,
but the plays are designed to clear out areas so that certain patterns are
more open.
you can draw plays in excel using the drawing toolbar.

what time are we going to scrimmage tomorrow?

Michael Simmons
11/14/2000 03:37 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Plays and other information

suggestion... make a playbook that just shows individual routes.. that way
Luis can just customize  in the huddle....

Ex.   outs, curls, out-and-up, post..  etc...

also,,    You give routes to the linemen and they should block  and then roll
out into the open flats once the defense goes past....

AND... most importantly.. how did you  draw those plays  excel....


Please find attached the following article/s:

"A test of metal" - FOW

"Enron's steel futures" - Metal Bulletin

Kind Regards,
Katy Lomax


Scott:

The response from Richard is that we are happy with UK courts so long as our
counterparty is in the UK, but if we have a counterparty on the continent and
there is any chance that submission to the exclusive jurisdiction of UK
courts might not be fully enforced in the counterparty's country, we should
go to arbitration.  In other words, we would prefer arbitration to ending up
in court in a jurisdiction in Europe.

Let's add this to the list of topics to discuss when I'm in London.

Thanks,

Mark

Scott Sefton
01/11/99 04:08 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: UK Courts vs. Arbitration for UK Swap Agreements

My sense is that the market custom here is to use the English courts, not
arbitration. I think the English commercial court judges are pretty
sophisticated and would be able to work through the issues.

Since Paul is out this week, I haven't had a chance to speak to him about
this. Let's wait to hear his views when he returns to the office. Thanks!

To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Scott Sefton/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: UK Courts vs. Arbitration for UK Swap Agreements

Richard:

In the US we have changed our swap agreement forms to provide for arbitration
in order to avoid having to explain the intricacies of derivatives trading to
judges or, God forbid, juries.  In Canada we are continuing to submit to the
jurisdiction of Canadian courts (on the theory that there are no juries in
civil actions and arbitration is rarely used in Canadian contracts
generally).  As we are presently in the process of revising our UK swap
agreement forms, I guess it's time to revisit the issue as it applies to UK
agreements.  Currently we agree to UK law and the jurisdiction of UK courts
(where there are no juries in civil actions).  Should this continue to be our
policy or should we begin going for arbitration in the UK contracts also?  I
would ask Paul and Scott to let Richard and me know if arbitration is widely
enough used in UK agreements that we can get away with asking for it.

Thanks,

Mark


Just a note to let you know Columbia Gas has some capacity postings on the
EBB for next winter.  BIDS ARE DUE 3/15 AT 9AM.
Attached is a spreadsheet showing the parcel numbers.  I highlighted the
meters that you did not have enough capacity to serve your load this winter.
I would be happy to bid on this as your agent, but let me know what rate
works based on your economics.  This is a bid process, so the current low bid
is just an indication of the market value of the capacity.

Scott


FYI.  Please keep confidential until further notice.  Important to note that
this was delivered with the understanding that NO ONE has agreed to the
specific language.  It was a quick turn around (at Hertzberg's request) to
get the original, negotiated agreement into Legislative language (i.e.,
Martian) as soon as possible so that Hertzberg could try to move on it in the
Legislature as soon as possible.

In addition, the Commission is likely to come out with its proposed "rate
agreement" sometime this week, and is likely to release DWR's "revenue
requirement" next week.  I heard from the Gov's financial advisor that Edison
and DWR EACH want 2 cents out of the PUC's recent 3 cent rate increase.  It's
going to get very interesting from here.

Best,
Jeff

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/10/2001 04:11 PM -----

	"Simpson, Rick" <Rick.Simpson@asm.ca.gov>
	07/10/2001 04:12 PM

		 To: "'dhunter@s-k-w.com'" <dhunter@s-k-w.com>, "Simpson, Rick"
<Rick.Simpson@asm.ca.gov>
		 cc: "'Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)'" <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "'Dominic
DiMare (E-mail)'" <dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>, "'Dorothy Rothrock
(E-mail)'" <drothrock@cmta.net>, "'John Fielder (E-mail)'"
<fieldejr@sce.com>, Gary.Schoonyan@sce.com, "'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'"
<isenberg@hmot.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Keith
McCrea (E-mail)'" <kmccrea@sablaw.com>, "'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'"
<lys@a-klaw.com>, "'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'" <lysherif@yahoo.com>, "'John
White (E-mail)'" <vjw@cleanpower.org>, Ann.Cohn@sce.com, "Mike Kahl (E-mail)"
<mikahl@ka-pow.com>
		 Subject: RE: Final Legislative Language

You all are awesome.  Many thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Delaney Hunter [mailto:dhunter@s-k-w.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Rick.Simpson@asm.ca.gov
Cc: 'Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)'; 'Dominic DiMare (E-mail)'; 'Dorothy
Rothrock (E-mail)'; 'John Fielder (E-mail)'; Gary.Schoonyan@sce.com;
'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'; 'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'; 'Keith McCrea
(E-mail)'; 'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'; 'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'; 'John
White (E-mail)'; Ann.Cohn@sce.com; Mike Kahl (E-mail)
Subject: Final Legislative Language

Rick-
Attached please find our final draft of legislative language per your
request. We are ready and willing to draft other sections or language as
needed by you or the Speaker. Please feel free to contact me if you have any
questions about the draft. Please note there are disagreements over two
sections of language and they are so marked.

FYI - I will be sending this document out to the entire Working Group for
their information.

Thank you,
Delaney

 - FINAL Legislative Language.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Brown/HOU/EES on 12/15/99 05:20 PM
---------------------------

GISB1@aol.com on 12/15/99 10:30:11 AM

[ &nbsp]Message[ &nbsp]-[ &nbsp]From:[&
nbsp]GISB1@aol.com on 12/15/99 04:30 PM GMT

To:	Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Brown/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Jrtemplton@aol.com, william_p_boswell@corp.cng.com

Subject:	DOE meeting

Stan, Shelley and Jeff:

    Attached is a draft of the announcement, agenda and two form letters.
January 26 is the date and we hope to have this announcement this week,
barring any problems that arise at the last minute.  Let me know if you have
any changes you would like made.  Jim and Bill have reviewed the announcement
and the agenda.

     We are putting together the list of associations and special invitees,
in addition, of course, to all GISB members.  So far the list includes the
AGA, APGA, APPA, EPRI, EPSI, NERC, NARUC Gas and Electric Committees, CUBR,
EEI, IPPA, NGSA, UIG, Governors' Association, Energy Subcommittee, NASUCA.
If you can think of any more let me know.

    On corporations -- we are targeting big utilities that are not GISB
members -- Southern, the Electric side of Cinergy, NYSEG, etc.  If you can
think of any others there, also let me know.

        Best Regards, Rae

 - meeting.PDF


Aimee,

You need to set up a transport capacity ticket in Sitara for this.  Heidi
Withers should be able to help you.  I don't know the contract to apply to
the deal. Heidi or Julie Meters may be able to help with this also.

D

   Aimee Lannou                03/20/2000 12:28 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: MidTex

Daren -

I need a service list contract set up for ENA for the MidTex line for Feb. 00
and March forward for meter 9735, deal # 203469 (XPRTUNG).  Does ENA have a
valid contract to ship on the MidTexas line?  Volume managEment would like
this done before close.  Please let me know.

- Aimee


---------------------- Forwarded by Rufino Doroteo/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2000
01:49 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Marilyn Rivera                           02/09/2000 01:36 PM

To: Kelly Summers/HOU/ECT@ECT, rebeccar@bcm.tmc.edu, mmartinez@tmh.tmc.edu,
Jessie Mata/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Birmingham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia K
Dechow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rufino Doroteo/HOU/ECT@ECT, mvillafu@houstonisd.org,
mgongora@hlt.ci.houston.tx.us, hern1@aerial1.com, kshama.pandya@telecheck.com
cc:
Subject: A SHOCKER

---------------------- Forwarded by Marilyn Rivera/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2000
01:35 PM ---------------------------

Julissa Marron@ENRON
02/09/2000 11:44 AM
To: Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela
Mendez/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Marilyn Rivera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S
Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marvia Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Faye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey Barclay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: A SHOCKER

Subject:  A SHOCKER

 - junk.jpg


I got this from Carlos from a deal he and Carolyn have worked on.  Note that
the language sounds familiar.  Someone must have sent this form to
NorthWestern.  I suspect an Enron person.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/28/2001 03:01
PM ---------------------------
From: Carlos Sole on 03/28/2001 01:00 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: PSEG Option Agmt


Hi Chris, yeah I'll be around this weekend and likely up for a drink or two. As long as you don't keep spreading my weekend parties around my office! Just kidding. I actually got an email from Steph at the same time as you telling me about Dan so I don't know who else I would talk to that would care, but I can give it a shot.
Oh yeah...as for the girl I was thinking I should set you up with, she was away last week when you came in but if you're ever wandering around, she sits in the second office in that's behind you when you are standing at the reception desk, her name is Tina and she's one of our financial advisors, really cute & really nice. So you can come check her out and of course stop by and say hi to me.
I'll see you Saturday, if not sooner.
Leslie

Chris.Dorland@enron.com wrote:

> Leslie
>
> What's up? Dan is coming to town this weekend and we are going to try to
> get a bunch of people to go out on Saturday. Let me know if you are going
> to be around and if you talk to anyone else let them know.
>
> Thanx
>
> Chris
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Dixon, Billy D" <billy.dixon@bp.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:00 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: Enron Canada Corp

Principal Operating Offices:

BP Corporation North America Inc.
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

BP Energy Company
501 West Lake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079

Vastar Resources, Inc.
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

BP Canada Energy Company
240 - 4th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2P 4H4

BP Canada Energy Marketing Corp.
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

Cibola Energy Services Corporation
350 N. St. Paul Street
Dallas, TX 75201

IGI Resources, Inc.
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

BP Oil Supply Company
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

BP Products North America Inc.
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

BP Amoco Chemical Company
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

Atlantic Richfield Company
333 S. Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071

Amoco Production Company
501 WestLake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079

BP Chemicals Inc.
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

-----Original Message-----
From: Heard, Marie [mailto:Marie.Heard@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 8:54 AM
To: billy.dixon@bp.com
Subject: RE: Enron Canada Corp

I sure will if you will tell me the principal place of business of all
your entities party to the Master Netting Agreement.

Enron Canada Corp.
3500, 400 - 3rd Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta  T2P 4H2

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Dixon, Billy D" <billy.dixon@bp.com>@ENRON
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 7:47 AM
> To:	Heard, Marie
> Subject:	Enron Canada Corp
>
> Would you please tell me where Enron Canada Corp.'s principal place of
> business in Canada is located?
>
> Very truly yours,
>
> BILLY
> Billy D. Dixon
> Attorney
> BP America Inc.
> 501 Westlake Park Blvd., Rm 16.166
> Houston, Texas 77079
> Direct 281/366-4745
> Fax 281/366-5901
> billy.dixon@bp.com
>
> ***IMPORTANT -- THIS EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENTS HERETO ARE
> ATTORNEY-CLIENT
> AND/OR ATTORNEY WORK-PRODUCT PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.  If you have
> received this email in error, do not under any circumstances read,
> forward,
> copy, disseminate or save this email or any of its attachments.  If
> you have
> received this email in error, take the following actions: (1) reply to
> this
> email indicating that you received this email in error, and (2) delete
> and
> completely erase this email and its attachments from your computer and
> any
> backup systems or "Deleted Items" folders.
>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Notice No. 00-316
September 8, 2000

TO:
ALL NYMEX MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX CLEARING FIRMS
ALL NYMEX OPERATIONS MANAGERS

FROM: Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT: INTIAL MARGINS FOR MID-COLUMBIA FUTURES

Effective Date: Friday, September 15, 2000  (close of business)

Futures Contract: Mid-Columbia Futures

Contract Months: All Contracts

NYMEX Division Margins on Mid-Columbia Futures Contracts

Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin): $9,000

Member Customer (Initial Margin): $9,900

Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin): $12,150

Spot Month Assessment: B/$3,000
B/ Effective as of the close of business one day prior to the last regular
trading day.

Intra-Commodity Straddle Margin
Clearing Member and Member Customer Maintenance
Group 1: $200
Group 2: $200
Group 3: $100
Group 4: $50
Spot Month Assessment: B/$3000
Group (Tier) 1 ~ 1st Nearby
Group (Tier) 2 ~ 2nd Through 6th Nearby
Group (Tier) 3 ~ 7th Through 12th Nearby
Group (Tier) 4 ~ Greater than 12th Nearby
B/ Effective as of the close of business one day prior to the last regular
trading day.

Inter-Commodity Spread Credit

Mid-Columbia/Natural Gas -- Ratio is 2:1 -- Percentage of Initial Margin is
40%
Mid-Columbia/Palo Verde -- Ratio is 2:1 -- Percentage of Initial Margin is 40%
Mid-Columbia/COB -- Ratio is 1:1 -- Percentage of Initial Margin is 40%
Mid-Columbia/Alberta Natural Gas -- Ratio is 2:1 -- Percentage of Initial
Margin is 40%

Should you have any questions regarding these figures, please contact Artie
McCoy at (212) 299-2928 or Joe Sanguedolce at (212) 299-2855.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(00-316)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Gentlemen,

I'm attaching what we are calling an override letter to accompany the
breakout contracts.  This letter is intended to preserve the lender
requirements/accounting treatment from the WestLB agreement so long as the
equipment is a part of the financing package.

I believe we also want to address an issue regarding assignment, but we are
still discussing Mike's version internally.

Kent, I look forward to talking to you tomorrow at 300 CST.  If you would
like to discuss any of this in the am, please give me a call.

Thanks,

Kay


I will be leaving the office at 3:00 today.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


We are running about 45 minutes behind schedule.  Can you please come 45 later than your originally scheduled presentation time?  Location is still 3371.  Please call if you have any questions.

Mari
713-854-7047
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:46 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John; Colwell, Wes; Port, David; Buy, Rick; Bradford, William S.; Beck, Sally; Hall, Bob M; Webb, Jay; Rub, Jenny; Oxley, David
Cc:	Muller, Mark S.; Capestany, Mari; Martin, Thomas A.; Lavorato, John; Schoppe, Tammie
Subject:	The Maple Leaves

This has got to be the last time.

Tomorrow morning a new team will arrive for due diligence purposes.

Tom Martin will be hosting this team

The Schedule outline is based on initial overview discussions/presentations  and then more detailed discussion can occur in individual groups the outline is as follows.  It may be better to split up earlier but I leave all those decisions to Tom   .

9:00		Introduction			John Lavorato & Louise Kitchen
9:30		Financial Overview		Wes Colwell
10:00		Risk Overview			Buy / Port
10:30		Credit				Bradford
11:00		Back Office			Beck/Hall
11:30		Systems (EnronOnline)		Jay Webb
12:00	            Mid/Back Office Systems	Jay Webb
12:45		Infrastructure			Jenny Rub / Bob
1:15		HR				Oxley

Afternoon	Dataroom and Trader discussions

Please make yourselves available.

Tammie - please check availability.

Thanks for your continued understanding.

The Maple Leaf is sending a team of 9 people.  They should arrive between 8 and 8:30 Wednesday morning and stay through Thursday evening (They are planning on a late night on Wed).

We are currently planning on using room 3371 for the data room, but are looking for another room that might be more accomodating for such a large group.  Please let me know who your point person will be and the schedule for the initial meetings.

Louise

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


Just a reminder that if you change any of the resolutions contained in our
Swap Resolutions Notebook, you need to update the Index, and substitute the
revised resolutions into each of the Swap Group's persons Notebooks.  These
would include for any of the trading companies, the resolutions that approve
what we trade (which also includes who can sign the appropriate documents),
as well as the brokerage approval resolutions.  It does not include the
Confirmation signatories.


I am forwarding to you several e-mails received today regarding this
transaction.  We are going to send out another draft confirmation for this
commodity spread swaption.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/11/99 05:00
PM ---------------------------
Sean Black   10/11/99 11:42 AM

To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Holmes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Spark Spread Confirmation

Dale/Bart/Sara,

We need to clean up the confirmation and any other legal information that
accompanies it (Bart/Sara, is the attached Omnibus T&Cs we proposed to use
standard documentation or are any revisions necessary prior to sending out to
CCSI?) so that we can send this out to CCSI for their review.

Looking at the confirmation, I see the following items that need to be
revised:

Trade date/Signing date - Not yet confirmed; will insert date the deal is
closed when it is known.
Need to specify which curve to look at in the Gas Daily Index (there is a low
high and a mid or average); we did not specify which one we would refer to
previously
Do we need to replace ECT with ENA throughout??
Catalytica should be Catalytica Combustion Systems (the subsidiary not the
parent)
Need to add in details about CCSI (name/title/payment account info etc.)

Sean - I will get the info for 5 from CCSI

Dale - Could you correct number 2, advise on number 3 and review the document
again to see if any other information is lacking that should be included?

Bart/Sara  - Could you advise about the details on the Omnibus (I have
misplaced any copy of this)  I thought there were some credit issues that
needed to be filled in at the bottom of this?

If anyone else could advise on other items that need to be addressed with
either the Confirmation and/or the Omnibus agreement, now is the time!

Regards,


Murray,

	I tried to send Mechelle the SQMD documents through the old Lotus Notes, but it would not allow me to do so. I will give you a call in the morning so we can discuss a work around. I know that Donna was able to send me an e-mail from Lotus Notes just last week.

							Chris


Guys,

The Historical report.exe that incorporates Storage Balance mod's can be found here:
(O:\FUNDY_OPS\IT\REPORT\HISTORICAL REPORT\HISTORICAL_V110.EXE)

Please test the veracity of the numbers and give me your feedback or signoff for production.
Thanks

Kim Alexander
Sr. IT Specialist
Enron Networks
Ph.(713) 345-3868
Email: kim.d.alexander@enron.com


The problems with the Online RSVP Form should now be solved.  We are sorry
for any inconvenience that you may have experienced.  Please give it another
try at http://lawconference.corp.enron.com!  Once you have submitted your
RSVP Form, you should receive a confirmation e-mail.  Please review your
confirmation information and let me know if there are any changes.  If you
get an error message and do not receive a confirmation e-mail, please e-mail
me or call me at (713) 853-9129.

Hint:
? Use Internet Explorer as your browser.
? The SAP Company Code should have 4 digits (i.e. 0011).
? The SAP Cost Center should have 6 digits (i.e.100180).

Remember, responses must be submitted no later than Friday, March 30, 2001.
For anyone requesting CLE credit for a state other than Texas, please submit
your RSVP Form by March 23, 2001.  See you in San Antonio!


Please distribute to rest of Sac team.  Thanks, Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/06/2001 05:02 PM -----

	JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>
	03/02/2001 04:53 PM

		 To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)"
<smara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Comments /Letter

 <<X22350.DOC>>  <<BILASALT.DOC>>

 - X22350.DOC
 - BILASALT.DOC


Mark:
Do you want to include a discussion about online trading and/or the current
and proposed bankruptcy provisions?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Mark E Haedicke
	04/18/2001 11:21 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Proposed ELJ Article

Please provide me your comments on the following outline:

Trading Contracts for Global Commodity Markets

1.  Evolution of Trading Contracts Since 1990
2.   Trading in 2001:  Living with Multiple Master Agreements
       a.   North America
       b.   Europe
       c.   other
3.   Globalization of Commodity Trading
4.   Lessons from the California Crisis
5.   Deregulation Marches Forward
6.   The Vision
      a.   single global master for physical and financial trading
      b.   use master netting agreements in transition phase
      c.   focus on confirmations and schedules for new products


Ed, thanks for the note - hope things are going well.

Regards
Delainey


Saturday, November 24, 2001

Dear Theresa,

Travelocity Fare Watcher, your personal airfare tracking
service, has found fare changes in 1 of your markets.

Note: Fares change quickly and sell out fast. Visit Travelocity
now to take advantage of this great opportunity!  Click on this
link or paste the URL into your browser:
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemindiv.ctl?fw=00022811976227&Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN

HAVE YOUR TRAVEL NEEDS CHANGED?

Looking to go someplace new? Be sure to update your Fare Watcher
subscription to include your favorite destinations.

FARES

*  DEN-SMF   FROM: Denver, CO (DEN)
             TO:   Sacramento, CA (SMF)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE        WAS        DIFFERENCE
             ---------      -------      ----------
             $423.00        $178.00      +$245.00

Thank you for choosing Travelocity as your one-stop travel
resource!

Sincerely,

The Travelocity Team
Travelocity.com - Go Virtually Anywhere
http://www.travelocity.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------

VACATION DEALS!

Hot deals to the Caribbean, Las Vegas, and more!
http://leisure.travelocity.com/RealDeals/0,2942,TRAVELOCITY_VAC,00.html

CRUISE DEALS!

Don't miss a look at our incredible Cruise Deals! Updated daily,
find the voyage that suits your budget!
http://leisure.travelocity.com/RealDeals/0,2942,TRAVELOCITY_CRU,00.html

SAVE $75 IN AIRFARE

Get $75 in Rebates on your next Airfare Purchases!
Join the Travelocity Preferred Traveler Program and you'll
receive up to $75 in rebates on your next three flights, hotel
savings and room upgrades, up to 20% off at restaurants
nationwide, and more. Enroll today!
http://leisure.travelocity.com/preferredtraveler/?source=PM

EARN FREE TRAVEL. NO RESTRICTIONS!

The NEW Travelocity World MasterCard
Earn points towards free travel with new Travelocity MasterCard!
You'll earn 1 point for every dollar spent. Earn 8,000 points
and you'll receive $100 off your next Travelocity.com booking.
We'll spot you 4,000 points to get started, so you are already
half way there! Visit http://www.travelocitycard.com to apply.

IMPORTANT FARE INFORMATION:

All fares are quoted in US Dollars.  Fares shown are for one
adult round-trip between your selected cities and are subject
to additional charges, including, but not limited to, Passenger
Facility Charges (ranging from $2-$18), Federal Segment Fees of
$2.75 per segment (defined as a takeoff and a landing), and
taxes/fees associated with international itineraries of up to
USD $113 or local currency equivalent. Fuel surcharges, if applicable
are included in the fees listed.

Total fare per passenger, including all charges, will always
be displayed to you prior to final ticket purchase. Please note
that fares are subject to restrictions, may not be available on
all flights, and may change without notice. For detailed descriptions
of the fare rules, click on the corresponding rules link.

CHANGE OR CANCEL YOUR SUBSCRIPTION TO FAREWATCHER EMAIL
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN

UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN

RETRIEVE YOUR PASSWORD
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/lognpwdform.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN


Start Date: 10/14/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101415.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/14/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SRP2
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


i know, you are helping

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you're welcome!  you need to cheer up.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:02 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

that was very nice


15 miles of spinning - Monday 7pm - Memorial park

Huff's got the new fancy machine - check it out!


Thanks for the suggestions for Richard.  Let me know if you think of other
ideas - I need b'day and Christmas ideas.

Probably the easiest thing to bring for Thanksgiving could be a dessert -- or
something else that is a favorite of your family.  I know that it is really
kind of hard to travel with food -- particularly since you will probably be
working on Wednesday morning.  I have made Thanksgiving dinner for so many
years (one of the few times that I really like to cook), that I will be glad
to cover it.  Your company will be the very best thing that you can bring.
We are looking forward to having you all here.  (The sleeper sofa for the
media room will arrive this Friday!)

"Cindy White" <cwhite@viviance.com> on 11/14/2000 11:10:32 AM
To: "Sally" <sally.beck@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: xmas

Hi...

Still trying to think of things for Richard.  Electric can opener,
Guatemalan Antigua coffee, new shirt for racquetball--he says XXL--hard to
find but most chain sporting good stores have that size--probably white or
something very basic with a collar.  He really does need this--his
racquetball duds are looking pretty bad...

We are looking forward to Thanksgiving--can't believe it is next week!  What
can we bring?

Cindy


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude25.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas25.pdf

Distillate and Unleaded charts to follow.

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG25.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG25.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL25.pdf


Julie,

Just wanted to check and see if you had received my last two emails.  If so,
I'd love to know what you think about the whole situation.  If not, let me
know and I will resend the emails.

Susan


FEMALE FLYERS

As the airliner pushed back from the gate, the flight attendant gave the
passergers the usual information regarding seat belts etc. Finally, she said,
"Now sit back and enjoy your trip while your captain, Judith Campbell and
crew take you safely to your destination."?

Joe sitting in the 8th row thought to himself, "Did hear her right; is the
captain a woman? I think I better have scotch and soda. When the attendants
came by with drink cart, he said, "Did I understand you right?  Is the
captain a woman?"

"Yes," said the attendant, "In fact, this entire crew is female."

"My God," said Joe, "I'd better have two scotch and sodas. I don't know what
to think of all those women up there in the cockpit."

"That's another thing," said the attendant, "We no longer call it the
cockpit."


The tickets for HOB will go on sale around next wednesday.  I will call and
get them.  I am starting to get pumped as well.  Luckily I have a trip to
Vegas in March that will hold me over.

I need to find my hand hacky sack so we will have a back up plan.  I have a
couple of new chairs in a bag for us - full lounge chairs.  They even have
beer holders in the arms.
PL

"Mike Jillard" <mjillard@beaconelectric.com> on 02/23/2001 10:08:36 AM
To: "Phillip M Love" <Phillip.M.Love@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Jazz

P, we are getting close. Did the Tickets go on sale  for any of the concerts
at the House of Blues?
?
We need to come up with a gimmick for the fest!  Like the Hand bean bags.
?
See you soon.
?
Jilly


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001
01:52 PM ---------------------------

From:  Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON
               01/25/2001 09:49 AM

To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--1/25/01


NETWORK WORLD FUSION FOCUS: NEAL WEINBERG on
PRODUCT REVIEW OF THE WEEK
12/12/00 - Today's Focus: Concord Communications' LiveHealth

Dear Wincenty
Kaminski,

In this issue:

* LiveHealth reports real-time network events
* Experts Exchange
* Links related to Product Review of the Week
* IT Job Spot(tm): Assess Your Leadership Skills

All new State of the WAN Town Meeting!

Join Network World at the State of the WAN: Extending Your
Business and Establishing QoS.  The highly interactive format
of this FREE Town Meeting gives you the chance to ask hard-
hitting questions and get straightforward answers from the
leading WAN experts.  Register today at
http://nww1.com/go/2184858a.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Today's Focus: Concord Communications' LiveHealth
---------------------------------------------------------------
By Neal Weinberg

For the Reviewmeister, there's nothing like the smell of real-
time data in the morning.

Historical data is nice, but it's real-time data that gets the
blood pumping. So, we took a close look at LiveHealth from
Concord Communications. LiveHealth collects real-time data and
reports it in an easy-to-understand, comprehensive and timely
fashion.

Like any new product, LiveHealth has its pros and cons. It
produces excellent reports and supports more than 500 kinds of
SNMP-aware devices. But it can't display a network's topology,
doesn't offer corrective actions, and wasn't all that easy to
install.

LiveHealth starts at $35,000, and is part of Concord's suite
that includes Network Health, System Health and Application
Health modules.

LiveHealth actively polls SNMP-manageable devices, determines
their status and condition, and displays the result in real
time. LiveHealth can present its reports via a browser-based
interface, a server-based console and Adobe Acrobat-based
reports. It also can send device status and condition data to
network management products such as Hewlett-Packard's OpenView.

LiveHealth is complex software. In addition to its
sophisticated network monitoring and reporting elements, it
comes with the CERN Web server for rendering management data
and reports as Web pages, an Open Ingres database engine for
storing network device data, and The Santa Cruz Operation's
XVision PC Xserver, which LiveHealth's server console uses to
display screen data.

LiveHealth's discovery process is quick and accurate. By
default, LiveHealth discovers network nodes daily at midnight.
At 5-minute intervals (or less often, if you wish), the SNMP
polling process probes the condition and status of network
devices. LiveHealth understands a plethora of Management
Information Bases, and it correctly recognized Lucent and Cisco
routers, Samsung and 3Com switches, and the other devices in
our test network.

LiveHealth can tell you if a device is performing as it's
supposed to, but it can't produce graphical maps showing
network hierarchies. It stores collected network device
information for six weeks in the Open Ingres database.

In its first few days, LiveHealth builds a baseline of normal
network behavior. Then, it can detect out-of-the-ordinary
events, such as excessively high or low traffic through a
router or switch port.

Once LiveHealth detects a problem, a network administrator can
choose to monitor the problem device in what Concord calls
"fast mode." LiveHealth polls the device in frequencies up to
twice a minute to help the administrator track the situation.

LiveHealth doesn't offer external alerting functions, such as
e-mail or paging, but relies instead on links to third-party
programs (such as HP's OpenView) to provide such notifications
or take corrective actions.

The strength of the program is reports that show device
information by time period, relationship to the organizational
structure and type of behavior or exception. We could see
devices that had experienced problems, by type of problem, as
well as those associated with a particular application.

LiveHealth runs on HP-UX, Solaris, Windows NT and 2000. The
documentation is comprehensive, but should include a better
roadmap to help users find the various software component
discussions in the manuals.

LiveHealth's installation was more difficult than we expected,
but we found that LiveHealth's focus on performance and its
extensive reporting are just what the doctor ordered.

For the full review, go to
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2000/1127rev3.html

To contact Neal Weinberg:
----------------------
Neal Weinberg is features editor at Network World, in charge
of product reviews, Buyer's Guides, technology primers,
how-tos, issue-oriented feature stories and the Technology
Insider series. You can reach him at mailto:nweinber@nww.com.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FOR RELATED LINKS -- Click here for Network World's home page:
http://www.nwfusion.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Got a technical question related to new technology on your
corporate network? Post it at Experts Exchange on Fusion at
http://nwfusion.experts-exchange.com/. Another network
professional may have the solution to your problem.

Concord's MyHealth ties net mgmt. tools together
Network World, 05/29/00
http://www.nwfusion.com/archive/2000/97754_05-29-2000.html

Concord unveils Exchange management app
Network Systems Management newsletter, 11/06/00
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/nsm/2000/1106nm1.html

***************************************************************
IT Job Spot(tm) presented by http://www.ITcareers.com

IT Leadership: How do you stack up?

Use Peopleassets.net to develop and retain your best group
leaders. Easily administered on-line assessments, goal setting
and support resources are ready to go. With Peopleassets.net,
your IT managers conduct self-assessments and generate
colleague feedback in total confidence. Team culture profile
adds additional perspective. Reduce turnover, improve
productivity. Click over and check us out.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;2191443;5137711;a
***************************************************************

The archive for Reviews is:
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/index.html

May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered
at your fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by
receiving 51 FREE issues to our print publication. Apply
today at http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl

*********************************************************
Subscription Services

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To change your email address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.

Other Questions/Comments

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Fusion Sales
Manager, at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Network World Fusion is part of IDG.net, the IDG Online
Network. IT All Starts Here:
http://www.idg.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2000


i went to get the tix this morn and couldnt get them.  i'll probably go to
dinner.   sorry

"Jennifer White" <jenwhite7@zdnetonebox.com> on 04/11/2001 08:42:45 AM
To: john.arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: tonight

So do your plans for tonight involve business or pleasure?

___________________________________________________________________
To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com


Jeff:

That sounds like a great idea.  Are there limitations on such meetings?  I
would think we need to be careful to avoid any appearance of impropriety.

Mark

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Jeffrey Keeler @ ENRON                           01/26/99 10:56 AM

To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark - ECT
Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin P
Hannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris
Long/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stacey Bolton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: CFTC Chair -- possible nominee

The leading candidate to replace Brooksley Born as CFTC Chair seems to be
Annette Nazareth (sp?), who is currently at the SEC.  She is a former Wall
Street lawyer with a good knowledge of the capital markets/derivatives
business, and others in the industry feel she would be sympathetic to our
views on regulation of the OTC markets.   She apparantly has the backing of
the White House and Treasury Department, and she fits the most important
criteria -- she's willing to take the job.

As she emerges more formally as the nominee, we might think about an Enron or
Energy Coalition meeting with Ms. Nazareth her to educate her to the
specifics of our business.  I'll keep you posted on the process.

Jeff


I think you can just include the electronc file and the appropriate person
can print it off when they print the Word file with the rest of the
contract.  I don't have any better idea than that.

Kay


Greetings...

Just a short note to thank you for your order.
Your order number is 01915827.

If you have any questions regarding your order, please email us directly at
ORDERREPLY@PATAGONIA.COM or call us at 1-800-638-6464 between the hours of
6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday and from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Saturday
and Sunday (times are Pacific Standard Time).  Please, be sure to include
your order number in your correspondence.

Thanks for shopping with Patagonia!


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 04:57
PM ---------------------------

Tori Kuykendall
04/26/2000 03:55 PM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test

---------------------- Forwarded by Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000
03:53 PM ---------------------------

Matthew Lenhart
04/26/2000 03:40 PM
To: Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000
03:39 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Elliott <shelliott@dttus.com> on 04/26/2000 08:03:31 AM
To: kmcgallion@king-ranch.com, Terri@EDIarchitecture.com,
jjohnson@daewoous.com, j.cruthis@mail.utexas.edu, hallieklassen@usa.net,
Matt@TriangleTechnology.com, ryane@ideas.tocquigny.com,
sclarkson@tractebelpowerinc.com, lloyd.pope@bus.utexas.edu,
Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com, michelelefever@yahoo.com, rmoser@emjmetals.com,
Allison Damon <adamon@dttus.com>, Josh Sherman <jsherman@dttus.com>, Maria
Vigil <mvigil@dttus.com>
cc:

Subject: Fw: Corruption Test

   I think we've all seen a different version of this.

______________________________ Forward Header
__________________________________
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
Author:  scody@acplasticsinc.com at Internet-USA
Date:    4/26/2000 8:00 AM

E-mail me back and let me know what you scored.

 - CORRUPTI.EXE
 - RFC-822.TXT
---------------------------- Forwarded with Changes
---------------------------
From: scody@acplasticsinc.com at Internet-USA
Date: 4/26/00 8:00AM -0500
To: Shirley Elliott at DTT.US.HOUSTON
*To: mjmyers@wt.net at Internet-USA
*To: matt_devine@standardandpoors.com at Internet-USA
*To: SABLICA@COMPUSERVE.COM at Internet-USA
*To: GATMAN@acplasticsinc.com at Internet-USA
*To: ashcrof@hs.utc.com at Internet-USA
*To: WALDRON50@YAHOO.COM at Internet-USA
*To: elvindarden@hotmail.com at Internet-USA
*To: deven.l.williams@us.arthurandersen.com at Internet-USA
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-


Hey dude.  Happy Holidays!
I haven't had a chance to look over yet, have you?  Anything we need to be
aware of?  Let's chat when you get back from holidays.

From: Jeff Dasovich on 12/26/2000 11:21 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Timothy J Hamilton/HOU/EES@EES, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Marsha Carson/ENRON@enronxgate, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: PG&E Gas Accord II Settlement Proposal

Note that this communication is confidential, covered by CA's settlement
rules.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/26/2000 11:14 AM -----

	"Lindh, Frank (Law)" <FRL3@pge.com>
	12/21/2000 07:50 PM

		 To:
		 cc:
		 Subject: PG&E Gas Accord II Settlement Proposal

Confidential Settlement Document
Per CPUC Rule 51

Gas Accord II Settlement Participants:

Attached is PG&E's Gas Accord II (GA II) Settlement Proposal.  We believe it
addresses many of the issues and concerns you have raised in the workshops.

As an overview, this proposal:

*   Maintains the basic Gas Accord structure in place today for the
period 2003 to 2007.
*
*   Offers end user transportation rates for 2003 lower for most
customers than rates in effect today.
*
*   Provides for vintaged Redwood path rates for core customers.
*
*   Offers a 7.5 cent/dth rate to large customers while minimizing rate
changes to other customers, minimizing the incentive for these customers to
seek to bypass local transmission charges and other CPUC-approved charges.
*
*   Adopts guidelines to improve reliability and help moderate prices in
gas commodity markets, and identifies the capital projects needed to meet
these guidelines over the course of the GA II period (2003-2007).
*
*   Provides a high degree of rate stability, with a 3.5% escalator to
capture both inflation and the cost of needed capital projects.  The
guaranteed rates will be adjustable only for significant changes in the cost
of capital or increased costs due to governmental requirements or
catastrophic events.
*
*   Preserves a rate differential between the Redwood and Baja paths,
although somewhat less than the current differential.
*
*   Proposes a two-stage open season for firm transportation services
beginning in 2003, with end users receiving a first option on available
capacity.
*
*   Maintains the core aggregation program with some adjustments.

PG&E also anticipates that the Core Procurement Incentive Mechanism (CPIM)
will be similar to today's mechanism, but will reflect the somewhat larger
capacity holdings needed to meet anticipated increases in core demand and to
meet a 1-day in 10-year cold weather event.

This also will serve as a reminder that an all-Party meeting is scheduled at
PG&E's headquarters in San Francisco on January 10 and 11, to discuss this
proposal and to respond to your questions.  We look forward to answering
your questions and receiving your feedback.

The attached documents include the GA II Settlement proposal, an Attachment
(a copy of PG&E's proposed Gas Rule 27), and a set of supporting workpapers.

Finally, please note that the Settlement document and the Attachment are in
"Word 2000" format.  We would be glad to provide the same documents in an
earlier version of Word, upon request by individual Parties.

We look forward to seeing you on January 10-11.  In the meantime, we extend
our best wishes for a safe and happy holiday season.

Frank Lindh               Ray Williams
(415) 973-2776            (415) 973-3634

 <<PG&E Gas Accord II Settlement Proposal 12-20-00.doc>>  <<Proposed Gas
Rule 27.doc>>  <<COS & Rates Workpapers for GA II 12-20-2000 Proposal.xls>>


Unlike other transmission providers, when we buy transmission from APS, the
Start Time and End Time are both HOUR ENDING.  According to them, they are
"the leaders of the pack."  So, if we want to purchase tranny for HE 14 FC to
PV (like I did today), both the start time and end time would be 14:00.  Make
sure that you have the right time zone as well.

Cheers
Jesse


Hello everyone,

Sometimes it is necessary to figure out how certain costs can be distributed
evenly and fairly among our groups here at the Portland West Desk.  Below you
will find an attachment that will automatically calculate the percentage
breakdown for each group, after entering the total amount in the space
provided.  The cell above "enter bill total here" is the sum of the column to
its left.  It should equal the bill total.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Kind regards,
Anna


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Dan Pribble Lunch

Date:		9/15/2000
Time:		11:30 AM - 1:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Hi Gregg,

Here is a new draft which incorporates comments that Boyd and I have made.  I
haven't reviewed this version yet, but I wanted to get it to you asap. I
would like to look at this draft before it goes to Peoples, and I'll give it
priority for tomorrow am.

I spoke with Dave Gorde (RAC).  He is prepared to discuss line of credit/DASH
at your convenience, although tomorrow he is tied up with PRC.

I'll go ahead and get a draft of a "simple" revolving line of credit doc
started, unless you think otherwise.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/12/2000 01:48
PM ---------------------------

"David Tucker" <dtucker@bracepatt.com> on 07/11/2000 05:13:51 PM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Agency Agreement

Per your request . . .

 - #1127382 v10 - NEW AGENCY AGREEMENT.doc


Bill:
I am available and I sent an e-mail to our outside counsel to see if they
would be available.  Since our call with them starts at 1 I doubt that the
call with ACE could start any earlier than 3 ish.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)

	Bill Windle@ENRON
	06/02/2000 01:31 PM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gaurav Babbar/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ACE USA Policy Review

ACE would like to review the previously forwarded draft policy  on Monday
(6/5). The three areas ACE would like to discuss are subrogation, books &
records and exclusions. We ceratainly are free to add to the list based upon
our review of the policy. Please indicate your availability on Monday in the
pm for 1-1 1/2 hrs. Thanks.


Marcie Romano
424 11th St.
Petaluma, CA 94952
marcierom@yahoo.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you
made from selling Enron stock before the company
declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee
Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's
employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide
relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't
afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made
millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers
and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of
Enron's employees were financially devastated when the
company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans
were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit
during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result,
there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay
their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is
bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million
worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the
company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this
money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those
Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Marcie Romano