thanx much Carol ... I will work on these while I await your "open issues"
list

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 1:35 PM
To: Jack.Falconi@guarantygroup.com
Cc: Ken.Curry@enron.com
Subject: RE: Meeting

Jack:
I will send you an open issues list shortly.  I considered items # 2,3,4,6,
9, 12, 17, 18, 19 and 21 to be credit-related comments, some of which I
need my credit person's input on.  As to the remaining points, here is my
response:

1.   Let's discuss exactly what language you want in item #1 as I agree
with you on the concept.

2.   With respect to item #7,  your interpretation is correct.

3.   I am not clear on what your point is in items #9 and 21.  As a general
rule, with respect to setoff rights, to the extent that ENA is the
Non-Defaulting Party and ENA's affiliates have entered into other
agreements with Inland Paperboard and Packaging, amounts owed under those
affiliate agreements can be setoff against amounts owed under the ISDA.
All the guaranty is trying to say is that the amount guaranteed under the
Guaranty takes into account the exercise of such setoff rights.

4.   I'm not sure I understand your point #10.

5.   I agree with your point #13.

6.   With respect to point #14, collateral is limited to cash and LC's and
the concept of a custodial account applies when someone other than the
Secured Party is holding      the cash collateral.

7.   With respect to point #19, we want the ability to convert the LC into
cash collateral when an Event of Default occurs even if we have not yet
terminated all transactions.  Once we have terminated and established a
termination amount, we would only draw to cover that amount if we didn't
draw earlier.

8.   The "deemed occurrence" language  is meant to cover termination events
that occur automatically without either party electing to terminate, such
as in a bankruptcy scenario where automatic early termination is elected.
We could probably take it out since there is no automatic early termination
on bankruptcy.

I look forward to hearing from you.  My credit person is out this week, but
maybe you and I can make some progress.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

                    "Falconi, Jack (TIFS)"

                    <Jack.Falconi@guaranty        To:
Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
                    group.com>                    cc:

                                                  Subject:     RE: Meeting

                    05/29/2001 10:16 AM

Hi Carol -
Sorry for the delay.  The "credit person" at Inland is probably Julie Beck,
although she can naturally be overruled by the Temple-Inland Treasurer,
Dave
Turpin, or CFO Randy Levy, since Temple-Inland will be obtaining the letter
of credit and will serve as guarantor.  Since they are at least one step
removed from the process, if you could tell me what questions/comments from
my 5/16 memo they will need to address, and ideally your
responses/commentary in some summary format, I can upstream this
information
to them, obtain their feedback, and speak on their behalf.
Thanx,
Jack Falconi

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 3:57 PM
To: Jack.Falconi@guarantygroup.com
Subject: Meeting

Jack:
My assistant will be calling you to set up a time next week when Ken Curry
and I can discuss your comments with you and your credit person.  Her name
is Suzanne Adams.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Here's the latest I've heard from EES regarding ways in which we've managed
to thoroughly confuse them. I'm researching most of these questions, but as
with last month, there are a few Real Time deals they don't see in the
spreadsheet you guys send to them. Would you mind checking this out when you
have a minute (or despite the fact that you don't)? If you revise anything,
just let me know or e-mail it directly to Mark Confer and Brooklyn Couch.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/13/2001 03:00 PM
---------------------------

Mark Confer
04/13/2001 10:39 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Minor revisions

Kate, I looked over the list below and 90% of them look easy, just a few
updates to the schedule or real time sheets and April activities will be well
on the way.

Please let me know what you think, If I can help from this end I will be glad
to.

Thanks, Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Confer/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2001 12:36
PM ---------------------------
To: Mark Confer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Minor revisions

Mark,

See attached for updates.

Thanks
bc

PS - I will be out of the office tomorrow.


the chart below graphs the major plans that represent the unexercised vested
options retained by employees and show whether the average grant prices.

Laurie Miller@ENRON
12/13/2000 04:22 PM
To: Suzanne Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Requested Information

	From:  Suzanne Brown @ ECT                           12/13/2000 01:34 PM

To: Laurie Miller/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Requested Information

can you help me graph this for steve and cindy. thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Suzanne Brown/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 01:37
PM ---------------------------

Susan Garcia@ENRON
12/12/2000 09:13 AM
To: Suzanne Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Requested Information

Here is the requested information revised.  I am only providing you detail
for the larger plans.

Susan


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2000 11:51 AM -----

	Lauren Hagerty@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	06/09/2000 03:18 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton@ECT, Lena Kasbekar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Donna Lowry@ECT
		 Subject: Trading Account for India

Sara,

I have drafted the attached based on what we did for the GDR acquisition.
Could you check the non-India trading names and titles to make sure they are
current.  I checked with Samantha but she said she was having computer
problems and wasn't familiar with the names.  And, obviously, we will not
have this done by Monday morning.  Is there anything we can do to get the
account opened on an expedited basis and then follow up with paperwork later?

Lena,

Once Sara checks the non-India names, may I have your permission to put your
initials on these documents and get them signed?

Thanks,
Lauren


Please see the above referenced subject line.  Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at 5-3317.  Thanks!

Keegan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Cheryl
Sent:	Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:04 AM
To:	Heitmeyer, Kayla
Cc:	Farrell, Keegan
Subject:	please forward and note that my office hours today are 6 a.m. to 3p.m. in light of a doctor's appointment this afternoon.


Thank you, Evelyn. I've back-dated Deal #456173 to 11/9. Let me know if
there's anything else I can do.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
11/13/2000 08:15 AM
To: Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing Deal?

Sorry...
the deal number to be backdated is 456173

---------------------- Forwarded by Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000
10:13 AM ---------------------------

Evelyn Metoyer
11/13/2000 10:13 AM
To: Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing Deal?

Can you please back date deal  to 11/09-00
 I spoke with PGET and they recognize this deal as brokered through Prebon
also.  I am still waiting for Prebon to claim the deal.

Carla Hoffman@ECT
11/10/2000 03:08 PM
To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing Deal?

Sean is entering the first deal as we speak. I will let you know as soon as
we have a deal number.

Sean said he is sure the second deal was done through Prebon. No one is there
right now, but he will double-check with them. Again, I will let you know as
soon as we confirm this.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
11/10/2000 01:06 PM
To: Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Missing Deal?

ISSUE 1
Prebon sent over a confirm for a deal traded 11-9-00 where:
Sean Crandall sells SCEM Dec'00 COB at $107.00 25 mw
I did not confirm this deal with them and I don't see it in the system.

ISSUE 2
Prebon is just now claiming  that they did not do this deal from 11/7/00.
Can you please check Sean or Dianna book because I have it checked as
verballed but now they are saying it is not there deal.:
Enron (Sean Crandal) buys from PGET 25 mw of NP-15 for 11/10-11/30 at $95.00


I do not believe that I have already sent the attached ISDA worksheet.  I
have also checked the Lotus Notes d/b and did not find any entry for Micron.
So I assume I did not send it.  Anyway, please begin drafting if it is not
already started.  Michael Moulton is interested in getting it completed, and
he has a better than average record of closing deals.

Thanks.
Paul


For some reason the initial email didn't go through to him--I forwarded it
separately.  Thanks.  DF

	From:  Bill Cordes                           05/26/2000 03:40 PM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Pueblo

Thank you. Did you mean to leave Bill Gang off your distribution list?

	From:  Drew Fossum                           05/26/2000 02:00 PM

To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Pueblo

Per our discussion last week, this is the status on Pueblo.  I think we need
to establish to our satisfaction the bona fides of Dennis' government
contracting scheme before we pitch hard to have ENA get into the deal and
scrub down the numbers on the power plant.  If our govcon gurus (Bill Votaw
and Bill Gang--both ex military guys working on DOD outsourcing deals for
Enron Federal Solutions) buy off on it, then I think we brief Stan at that
point.  You, Stan and Steve will then need to decide the best way to pitch
ENA to verify the economics and potentially get into the deal.  Either we'd
have Stan push from the top down or have Kevin and  Steve go directly to the
ENA deal guys.  More to follow.
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 05/26/2000
01:50 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Drew Fossum                           05/26/2000 01:51 PM

To: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Pueblo

I just talked to Tino Monaldo, Dennis Langley's lawyer/project manager for
the Pueblo project.  I explained Bill and Bill's credentials and concerns and
Tino suggested that a sit down between Enron and their government contracts
team might be helpful.  He offered to do it in Houston, probably late next
week or the following week.  Attending would be Dennis, Tino, and their
outside lawyers, Jim Slattery and Rick Harrington.  Harrington is the key--he
is a retired military guy and one of the lead govt. contracts lawyers at my
old firm in DC.  The would basically put on a dog and pony walking us all
through their sole source strategy,  including their legal interpretations
and the allies they have lined up within DOE/DOD.  Bill and Bill--does such a
meeting sound productive?  If so, should we have outside govt. contracts
counsel present and if so, who do you suggest?

On a related note, Tino explained (without me asking or really caring) that
he was in the middle of a "big drafting project"--revising Dennis' joint
venture agreement with the Isleta.  I took the opportunity to express my
concern at how far down the road Dennis is getting on the overall deal,
including structure issues, without knowing whether Enron is even on board.
I reminded Tino that GPG has not committed to participating in the pipeline
or the power plant, and that we have not obtained ENA's agreement to commit
turbines.   Apparently Dennis believes that if the economics pans out, Enron
or someone else yet to be identified will magically jump in to the deal with
money, turbines, etc.   If Enron does eventually decide to get into this
deal, the agreements and promises that Dennis has already made may need to be
revisited.   Thanks for your patience on this project.  DF


For your reading pleasure, I'm sending a copy of the infamous 97-10.

Kay


Jeff, my understanding is that, various level of emergencies are declared by
the CAISO because of power supply situations.   Rotating outage plans are
then required to be implemented by the Utilities in order to reduce their
power supply requirements (i.e. electric loads).   The utilities chose to
implement their Rotating Outage Plans by dropping various distribution
circuits, that do not have essential customers connected to them, on a
rotating basis because it is cheap and easy to implement, less controversial,
and less politically sensitive.

The following are my comments:
My main concern is with regards to the way they propose to handle Direct
Access customers.   Direct Access customers should not be included in PG&E's
Mandatory Curtailment Plan (MCP) because the power that these customers are
using is not coming from PG&E anymore.   Their power supply requirements are
being met by their ESP's.
PG&E's proposal is treating transmission level customers like utilities.
The only difference, this time, is that PG&E is acting like the regulator
(controlling the customer).
At a minimum, the cost of implementing their proposal should be paid for by
PG&E and not the transmission customers.
Non-firm customers, such as IBM, should not be included or be required to
participate in their MCP anymore because their loads are dropped down to the
minimum or essential levels, by the CAISO first, even before a state of
emergency is declared.   There is a minimum load level that facilities
require in order to maintain human and environmental safety conditions.

Please give me a call if you have any question.

Thanks

---------------------- Forwarded by Jess Galura/HOU/EES on 09/27/2000 09:27
AM ---------------------------

John Wack
09/26/2000 07:57 AM
To: Jess Galura/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Jeff Nieland/HOU/EES@Exchange, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Roger
Yang/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: FW: Transmission curtailments - PG&E Proposal

Jess,  what do know about this?  If you have any info let Jeff Nieland
know.

Jeff  N.,  I am not familiar with the Cal. EEP.  In most state it is not
unusual for transmission customer (usually all the  customers are involved)
to be part of the plans.  Jeff Dasovich or Roger Yang may have more details.

---------------------- Forwarded by John Wack/HOU/EES on 09/26/2000 07:50 AM
---------------------------
From: Jeff Nieland/HOU/EES@Exchange on 09/25/2000 07:10 PM
To: Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, John
Wack/HOU/EES@EES, Ress Young/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Chris Holmes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: FW: Transmission curtailments - PG&E Proposal

Gentlemen,

Do we have any influence over this issue with our direct access customers in
California?  IBM San Jose is on an interruptible transmission tariff and is
concerned about the proposed Mandatory Curtailment Plan.  I would appreciate
any comments.

Thanks

Jeff

Tom - Who would you recommend asking to comment from our regulatory
department?

-----Original Message-----
From: Nieland, Jeff
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 6:29 PM
To: '"Kumar De Silva/San Jose/IBM" <kdesilva@us.ibm.com>@ENRON@EES'
Cc: "lguest" <lguest@us.ibm.com>; "Gregory G Peterson/Raleigh/IBM"
<petegreg@us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: Transmission curtailments - PG&E Proposal

Kumar,

I have distributed the plan to our commodity and regulatory departments for
comments.  After receiving their comments, I will summarize and forward.
Please contact me with questions.

Thanks

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: "Kumar De Silva/San Jose/IBM" <kdesilva@us.ibm.com>@ENRON@EES
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 5:34 PM
To: Jeff_Nieland@enron.com
Cc: "lguest" <lguest@us.ibm.com>; "Gregory G Peterson/Raleigh/IBM"
<petegreg@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Transmission curtailments - PG&E Proposal

Jeff,
We are concerned about the impact of the proposed Mandatory Curtailment
Plan.\ (Please see Lynn's Note below)   Please review from a commodity
provider standpoint.  In your opinion, is it fair for us to be subject to
such legislation while we are a Direct Access Customer?

I would appreciate your comments.

Regards,

Kumar

Facilities Engineering Manager
Department K3MA-124,  Office 12-4A052
IBM Real Estate and Site Operations
5600 Cottle Road, San Jose,  California 95193

Tel: (408) 256-1004, Tie Line: 8-276-1004,  Fax: (408) 256-2699,
---------------------- Forwarded by Kumar De Silva/San Jose/IBM on
09/20/2000 03:03 PM ---------------------------

Lynn Guest
09/15/2000 11:28 AM

To:   Kumar De Silva/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS, Ray Dias/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS, Aida
      Maciel/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS, John Lattyak/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
cc:
From: Lynn Guest/Almaden/IBM@ibmus
Subject:  Re: Transmission curtailments - PG&E Proposal

Here is a soft copy of what I faxed you yesterday.

Lynn Guest
  Site Operations Manager, Almaden Research Center

IBM Corporation
650 Harry Road, M/S - G2
San Jose, CA 95120-6099
(408) 927-1529  or Tie line 8-457-1529
Fax (408) 927-1230

E-Mail:  LGUEST@US.IBM.COM
---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Guest/Almaden/IBM on 09/15/2000
11:30 AM ---------------------------

Pam Ross <pross@camfg.com> on 09/14/2000 10:02:31 AM

To:   Alan Amrhein <amrhein@ppg.com>, Allan Warman
      <allan.p.warman@boeing.com>, Barry Hughes
      <Barry.L.Hughes@boeing.com>, Bill Guernsey <bill.guernsey@trw.com>,
      Bill Zobel <bzobel@mail.arco.com>, Bryan Campanaro
      <bcampana@kcc.com>, Cameron Raether <paccoast@mctcnet.net>, Carl
      Nordquist <carl.j.nordquist@boeing.com>, Carolyn Kehrein
      <cmkehrein@ems-ca.com>, Dan Fink <daniel.L.fink@boeing.com>, Dan
      Green <dgreen@ppg.com>, David Mills <david.m.mills@honeywell.com>,
      "Denis St. Jean" <dstjean@tosco.com>, Dorothy Rothrock
      <drothrock@camfg.com>, Ed Munoz <emunoz@west.raytheon.com>, Fred
      Mazurski <fmazurski@usg.com>, Gene Hill <ghill@kcc.com>, Glenn
      Sheeren <gsheere2@iccnet.com>, Jeff Byron <jbyron@us.oracle.com>, Jim
      Schultz <Jim_Schultz@cargill.com>, Jim Wikenczy
      <Jim_Wikenczy@mail.tmmna.com>, Joanne Horalek <jhoralek@smurfit.com>,
      John Norris <John.Norris@HSC.com>, Karen Jarrell
      <kjarrell@smurfit.com>, Karen Lindh <karen@klindh.com>, Keith McCrea
      <kmccrea@sablaw.com>, Ky Kennedy <kkennedy@usg.com>, Larry Voronyak
      <larry.voronyak@borax.com>, Lynn Guest/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS, Mark
      Mithers <mithema@mail.northgrum.com>, Mark Nelson
      <Mark_Nelson@hp.com>, Mark Skowronski
      <mark.skowronski@honeywell.com>, Miles Keefe
      <emkeefe@west.raytheon.com>, Noel Brown <noel.brown@ct.sgcna.com>,
      Pam Ross <pross@camfg.com>, Richard Hall <richard.c.hall@intel.com>,
      Roland Buchs <BUCHS@imcchemicals.com>, Russell Boston
      <reboston@ppg.com>, Scott Potterack <Scott.Potterack@owens-ill.com>,
      Stacy Roscoe <roscoesa@pg.com>, Steve Bloch
      <steven.bloch@alliedsignal.com>, Steve Watson
      <swatson@ballfoster.com>, Tim Treichelt <tntreich@gapac.com>, Tony
      Fisher <tfisher@nummi.com>
cc:
Subject:  Re: Transmission curtailments - PG&E Proposal

This is the item regarding mandatory curtailment Karen Jarrell
referenced to in her note.

Subject: Transmission curtailments - PG&E Proposal
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 07:51:51 -0700
From: Dorothy Rothrock <drothrock@camfg.com>
Organization: CMTA
To: pross@cmta.net

From: Shaffer, Clyde [mailto:CWS1@pge.com]
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 5:34 PM
To: 'dgreen@ppg.com'; 'kohr@ppg.com'
Subject: Transmission curtailments - Proposal
Importance: High

Hi Dan and Tom,

Greetings.  I hope all is well with both of you and PPG.

I recently received information that transmission voltage customers will
likely be required to be involved in the Electric Emergency Plan (EEP)
in the future.  Currently transmission customers are not "required" to
curtail any load when distribution circuits are taken off line as a
result of a Stage 3 EEP operation.

Please take a look at the attachment below and if possible provide
comments to help shape the proposed change.  I will need comments by
this Friday noon if possible.  Thanks for the input.

Clyde Shaffer
Co.: 821-5549
Outside: (559)263-5549
Email: cws1@pge.com

(See attached file: MANDATORY CURTAILMENT PLAN.doc)

 - MANDATORY CURTAILMENT PLAN.doc << File: MANDATORY CURTAILMENT PLAN.doc >>


Thank you for shopping at Abestkitchen.com!

Order Number 14171
Comments / More Information:

Comments / Gift Card Text (Limit 200 Characters):
Congratulations, Pete and Christy.  We forever expect to be welcomed in your
home with cold liquids and frosty glasses.

Qty  Name                                  SKU           Price Sub Total
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1    Beer Dispenser                        SBC-500B    $645.00   $645.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Sub Total     $645.00
                                                   Tax Total       $0.00
                                            Shipping: Ground      $78.00
                                                 Grand Total     $723.00

Most orders ship via UPS (large orders ship via truck, and some special order
items ship direct from the manufacturer).  If your item ships via UPS, you
can track it here after it ships:
http://www.abestkitchen.com/store/shipment-tracking.html
(use your order number)

Send us feedback:
http://www.abestkitchen.com/store/feedback.html

Thank you for shopping at Abestkitchen.com! Please keep us in mind for all
your kitchen and bar needs.  Please come again!

Abestkitchen.com
Commercial quality supplies for restaurants, kitchens, and bars.
http://www.abestkitchen.com
330-535-2811

You also have been entered to win this month's prize in the Abestkitchen.com
Monthly Drawings.  More info is here:

http://www.abestkitchen.com/store/kitchen-contest.html

URL http://www.abestkitchen.com/store/index.html

This store is powered by ShopSite web catalog software.


Dear Vincent,  I'm Washington Bureau Chief Peter Cook filling in for Jay Rickerts.   Just a reminder - On Friday, Houston Correspondent Kim Benestante is live in Cairo, Egypt covering the OPEC meeting.  Join us tomorrow as Kim brings us the latest on possible oil production cuts beginning in January.      We'll also have more reaction from here in Washington to the OPEC meeting.  American Petroleum Institute Chief Economist John Felmy, Ph.D., will share his thoughts on the cartel's moves and what they might mean for the U.S.  Also during the 12:00 p.m. ET newscast, The Petroleum Finance Company Senior Market Analyst George Beranek will give us his assessment of the market if OPEC follows through with a production cut.   The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has had a very busy year - from the California crisis to the crisis at Enron, the Commission has had a full docket.  On Friday during the 10:00 a.m. ET newscast, we'll hear what former FERC Chairman James Hoecker thinks about the past year at the FERC and what issues may surface during the New Year.   As the year draws to a close, the Houston bureau will take a look back at one of the biggest energy stories - the collapse of the energy giant, Enron.  Houston Bureau Chief Myra Jolivet says on Friday, the Houston bureau will review the timetable of Enron's demise, the effects of its bankruptcy filing, layoffs and the company's downgraded credit rating.    As Texas deregulation nears, competition in the market is heating up among retail energy providers.  The Houston bureau says the Texas Public Utility Commission set the price to beat for areas in the state, and competing retail energy providers are beating those prices.  We'll have all the details from the Houston bureau on Friday.   West Coast Correspondent Kym McNicholas says on Friday, California Senator Debra Bowen talks about what to expect from the legislature in the first few weeks of 2002.  Kym says possible topics of discussion include the issuance of the state's $12.5 billion in energy bonds, the California Power Authority and plans to get Southern California Edison and PG?out of debt.   Also on Friday from the West Coast bureau, California Energy Commissioner Michael Moore talks about the gas supplies in California.  Join us for these reports and more from Sacramento tomorrow.    Closing Prices for Thursday, Dec. 27, 2001    Crude: $20.90/bbl -$0.37   Unleaded: $0.5927/gallon -$0.0086   Heating Oil: $0.5815/gallon -$0.0131   Gas: $2.555/mmBtu -$0.356   Broadcasting Note: On New Year's Eve, we're broadcasting through 1:00 p.m. ET.  We're dark on New Year's Day.   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests have to reschedule or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Peter Cook, EnergyNewsLive.com Washington Bureau Chief  View today's Energy Wrap Video Windows Media Player: 56K  | 100K  | 300K  Real Player: 56K  | 100K  | 300K  (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue, subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now    If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 03/26/2001 01:55 PM -----

	T Paul Johnson@ENRON
	03/26/2001 12:15 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: James Derrick/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Litigation report

A number of pieces of on going litigation and arbitration being conducted on
behalf of EML and EMC have very recently come to our attention which we
summarise below. We have endeavoured to establish the detail of these cases
as quickly as possible, but in some instances await information from outside
counsel involved. The summary is therefore necessarily provisional, and will
need to be supplemented. There are in addition other claims of which we have
been made aware, largely being run by MG Hong Kong and Beijing offices.
Details are presently so sketchy that we have not included them until we have
been able to verify. A supplementary note on these will follow asap.

1. Corporacion Nacional del  Cobre de Chile ("Codelco" )  v.  MG Ltd, MGAG
and MGCC

This is a major, and very serious claim being brought by the Chilean state
copper trading company Codelco against, primarily MG AG of Frankfurt, but
also against MG Ltd (now Enron Metals Ltd) for recission of futures contracts
on the basis that they were procured by fraud (a bribe of US$1.5m paid to the
main Codelco trader by MGAG). We have received a brief summary of the claim
from Slaughter & May, the lawyers handling the litigation on behalf of EML,
which is attached below. As a result of an indemnity from MG AG, MG Ltd has
NO financial exposure other than a credit risk to MG AG.

Legal professional privilege must of course be maintained for this document
and its contents, and any dissemination outside the legal dept should be made
subject to prior approval by legal.

Trial is set down in the Chancery Division of the High Court in London for
5-6 weeks, commencing October 2001. Significantly, and as you will be aware,
High Court proceedings take place in public.

 - LT010810084_3.doc

2. MG Ltd v. China Resources National Corporation

Claim in LME arbitration for payment of US$6m futures losses on client
contracts. Award published in favour of MGL on liability alone in August
2000. Damages to be assessed. Thereafter Award to be enforced in China.
Solicitors: Clyde & Co.

3. MG Ltd v. London Clearing House

Claim in LME arbitration for delivery of defective tin under warrant. Losses
believed to be US$800,000. 7 day time bar defence run by the LCH heard as
preliminary issue. Award in approx Feb 2000 in favour of MG (ie time bar
inapplicable). This has led to resumption of settlement negotiations with
Standard Chartered Bank (trading), who put the metal onto warrant originally
(and against whom the LCH would have an indemnity claim). The most recent
offer from Standard Chartered is to pay US$437,000; but this is subject to
unacceptable conditions. Solicitors: Allen & Overy.

4. Nickel explosion in furnace in Cleveland: Scandia Transport
LMEWarehouse/LCH/EMC/Phoenix /EAC/ Cast Alloys (smelter)

Contaminated nickel supplied by EMC into the US. Amount of loss being
established now. Incident much less bad than initial reports suggested, and
have therefore deferred explosion survey/investigation lined up on urgent
basis earlier this week. Expect indemnity claim to be brought against EMC by
Phoenixx in LME arbitration; and to pass same claim on to the LCH. Assume
possibility of US tort claim also lying direct from Smelter to EMC (awaiting
advice from Limor Nissan/Andy Edison on this). Facts should become
sufficiently clear to enable rough quantification within next week (w/c 26/3).

NB. Other similarly contaminated shipments from the same warehouse are known
to exist. Warnings to other customers are being prepared.

5. LME arbitration: Chinese receiver/ICD/Brandeis/EMC/EML/LCH/Warehouse

Claim brought by Chinese receivers for supply of defective nickel on LME
warrant bought through London clearing. Only US$62,000 claim, but involves
significant point of principle, hence decision taken to proceed in
arbitration. Should in principle be able to pass on incoming claim to LCH
(and beyond). Expect unrecoverable costs (internal and external) to exceed
the amount of the claim. Solicitors to be instructed w/c 26/3.


"Roy J. Shanker" <royjshanker@worldnet.att.net> writes to the
NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

I won't repeat everything that Mark said. I agree with all of it. I
publically stated several times that it would be appropriate for parties to
consider these plus other risk elements in formulating bidding strategies
for upcoming ICAP.

However, it also appears that Steven has forgotten a major and fundamental
change in the ICAP markets. This is surprising as he characterizes ICAP as a
call on the resource. When ICAP was offered for last summer there was no
energy price cap, or effectively the price cap was $10,000, today it is
$1,000. This means that in the context of his analogy a call was offered
last summer with a strike price of $10,000 versus $1,000 today. An order of
magnitude change in strike price for the seller of a call seems pretty major
to me, particularly when coupled with all of the other new risk factors and
general "tightening" of supply versus demand.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nyiso_tech_exchange@lists.thebiz.net
[mailto:owner-nyiso_tech_exchange@lists.thebiz.net]On Behalf Of Stephen
Fernands
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 1:05 AM
To: market_relations@nyiso.com; Tech Team EMail List,
Cc: Brian Hayduk; Jmoore; Peter Duprey; jkennedy@newenergy.com
Subject: Re: NYISO - MC - Document from Stephen Fernands to MC Members

"Stephen Fernands" <srfernands@cesolution.com> writes to the
NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

Mark,
Thank you for your thoughtful response.  I think you raise some valid
points, but I do not think they change the end conclusion.

Fundamental Value of ICAP
The principle of the ICAP market, as in any market, should be to reflect the
value of the underlying product that is being sold to the market.  The
question is whether the product being sold, in this case ICAP, has truly
appreciated more then 400% since the previous ICAP auctions.  Maybe - but I
doubt it.

AMP and Expected Revenue
The premise that changing the existing market mitigation rules to catch rule
breaking on a real time basis instead of a one day lag basis, although
plausible, seems fairly weak.  It presumes that generation owners were
planning on violating the pre-existing screens and counting on the revenue
from those "golden eggs."  Likewise, the link between "expected energy
revenue" and ICAP prices is tenuous at best.  Generators are not limited to
receiving revenue from the spot market and may well choose to sell energy in
the bilateral market.  In either case the goal of the generation owner is to
maximize revenue through all markets.  The ICAP market, if functioning
properly, should reflect the value of the first call on the energy from the
generator by the NYISO and the ability of the NYISO to curtail external
transactions from that generator.  For example two generation owners owned
two plants with the same characteristics. One generation owner did a
relatively "good" job selling a forward energy contract for the 6 month
procurement period while the other owner did a relatively "poor" job selling
a similar contract.  In the ICAP auctions they both should have the same
strategy - maximize the revenue that each of them can receive out of the
ICAP auction.  Any other strategy by either of the plants will lead to
overall lower profits.

Price Cap Load Bidding (I won't comment on if Virtual Bidding were in place
because it isn't going to be)
Price Cap Load Bidding has been available in the past, only know it is
expanded slightly to Zonal Price Cap Load Bidding.  This is not a
significant change to the existing rules and would seem unlikely to account
for either a significant change in the expected energy revenue or the
underlying value of the ICAP product.

"...significant uncertainty to the New York market..."
I would agree that all of the rule changes including the Penalty and Public
Disclosure Proposal  made it difficult for generation owners to properly
evaluate the effects of selling ICAP into a 6 month market.  For this
reason, as well as the other possible reasons listed on my letter, I believe
that mitigating measures should be evaluated.  I am not passing judgment at
this stage, but feel that all parties should know that the prices that were
posted are in the process of being reviewed and that subsequent changes may
be required to some or all of the months.

Next Steps
If the MMU determines that there was economic and/ or physical withholding,
whether due to regulatory uncertainty in surrounding control areas or
internal uncertainty about the exact effects of the AMP, I believe that it
is most appropriate for the MMU to take immediate action and refer it to the
committees for longer term resolution.

Stephen Fernands
Consultant
AES NewEnergy
215.875.9440

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Younger" <mdy@slater-consulting.com>
To: "Tech Team EMail List," <nyiso_tech_exchange@global2000.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:04 PM
Subject: FW: NYISO - MC - Document from Stephen Fernands to MC Members

> Steve Fernand's comments on the recent ICAP deficiency auction results are
> based upon a fundamental misunderstanding of the ICAP market.  This
> misunderstanding is summarized in his statement that "Unlike the electric
> commodity, there have been no significant changes in the underlying costs
> for suppliers of ICAP."  Since last summer there have been very
significant
> changes in the factors that affect the ICAP markets in New York.
>
> The basic principle of the ICAP market is that it provides the generator
(or
> external ICAP provider) a mechanism to recover costs that are not
adequately
> recovered from the energy market.  In return for this revenue the
generator
> accepts an obligation to bid into the NYISO day-ahead energy market every
> day that the generator is not out of service due to either maintenance or
> forced outage.
>
> The basic theory on developing a bid into the ICAP market for an internal
> generator is that the generator should estimate the total revenue it
> requires from the ICAP market to continue operating. This calculation is
> based upon its total cost of remaining in business less its expected
profits
> from the energy market (expected revenues less expected fuel costs).  For
> external suppliers the ICAP bid is based upon the opportunity cost of
being
> obligated to the New York energy market rather than being either obligated
> to another market or having no obligations to any market.
>
> Clearly, in each case, the bid into the capacity market is dependent upon
> the expectations of the New York energy market.  There have been several
> adopted and proposed changes in the New York energy markets that make them
> both less desirable than last year and less desirable than the energy
> markets surrounding New York.  These include:
>
> The Circuit Breaker/AMP - The Circuit Breaker/AMP creates both a concern
> that the day-ahead market prices will be depressed from the levels that
> should exist.  The implementation of the circuit breaker raises concerns
> that the market prices in New York energy price will be depressed.  The
> potential ways in which the DAM prices could be depressed include failure
to
> incorporate changing unit operating parameters, fuel costs, or emissions
> costs.  Additionally, while opportunity costs are a part of an acceptable
> bid, there is no methodology to keep the circuit breaker from effectively
> removing the opportunity costs for a circuit broken bid.  Finally, the
> design of the circuit breaker may result in numerous individual bids by
> different market participants being circuit broken when they are not
> exercises of market power.  Every time a bid is improperly circuit broken
it
> affects all sellers because all sellers end up being paid less in the DAM
> then they should have received.
>
> In addition to these questions about whether the AMP will improperly
depress
> prices, there is still uncertainty to how  a generator that has been
> improperly mitigated is supposed to be able to be compensated.  This was
> part of the original circuit breaker design but as of this point the NYISO
> has failed to provide any description of how this process will work.
There
> is also uncertainty about the reference prices and the process that
> generators will follow in getting changes or exceptions to the reference
> prices accepted.  The uncertainty raises the cost of being obligated to
the
> New York market.
>
> Price Capped Load Bidding - The price capped load bidding mechanism that
is
> being implemented this summer provides a sophisticated tool to a small
> subset of market participants to determine whether they want to purchase
at
> the DAM market prices.  This provides the possibility that day-ahead
market
> prices will systematically be depressed relative to the real time market
if
> this mechanism is abused.  Virtual load bidding has been blocked for the
> summer.  If virtual load bidding were implemented it would provide a
> potential check on this market manipulating behavior.  The only check
> allowed in our market design is the inclusion of opportunity costs in the
> generator day-ahead market bids.  As addressed above, the application of
the
> Circuit Breaker/AMP is likely to impede the generators including
opportunity
> costs in their bids thereby eliminating the only check on using the price
> capped load bids to manipulate the market.
>
> Penalty and Public Disclosure Proposal -  This proposal will penalize
market
> participants that are mitigated for exceeding the NYISO Market Mitigation
> Measures. There have been issues raised related to this proposal regarding
> due process and fundamental fairness.  The penalties only apply to
> generators and other suppliers.  The penalty is not based upon a
> determination that the market participant has exercised market power.
> Finally, the ADR process can determine whether mitigation was properly
> applied by the NYISO but cannot determine whether the penalty that was
> applied was appropriate.
>
> Each of the above measures has resulted in a potential reduction in energy
> market revenues and added significant uncertainty to the New York market.
> The above price control measures are not in place in the surrounding
> markets.  Each of these makes the New York market less desirable than its
> neighbors and raises the price of being obligated to the New York market.
> Interestingly, the Penalty and Public Disclosure Proposal was approved by
> the NYISO Management Committee between the ICAP Monthly auction and the
ICAP
> Deficiency auction.
>
> The above are not the only price control proposals that have been made for
> the NYISO energy market.  Most notably, there have been proposals for $150
> price caps in the energy market and retroactive price authority.
> Fortunately, both of these ill-considered proposals were ultimately
> withdrawn.  However, the mere fact that they were proposed inflicts
> uncertainty on the energy market and therefore increases the expected
prices
> in the ICAP market.
>
> Two final points need to be clarified regarding Mr. Fernand's argument
that
> the results of the auction indicate a problem.  First, he lists the change
> in ICAP market clearing prices between last year and this year as
indicating
> there is a problem in the ICAP markets.  When generators bid into last
> summer's auction they had not yet experienced summer operation under the
> NYISO markets. There also had not been the broad range of price control
> measures proposed and adopted for this summer.  Compared to last summer,
> ICAP bids for this summer would have incorporated better understanding of
> the expected profits in the energy market as well the expected impacts of
> the price control measures.  Second, he also uses the results of this
> summer's strip/monthly auction and the deficiency auction as an indication
> of there being problems in the ICAP market.  Because the entire ICAP
> requirement is not cleared in a single auction, the prices that are bid
into
> the earlier auctions are essentially an ICAP providers estimate of its
> opportunity cost of selling in the earlier auction rather than selling in
a
> later auction.  This requires the ICAP providers to guess the likely bids
of
> the marginal ICAP providers.  The results of this years auctions merely
> indicate that those who sold in the early auctions apparently did not do a
> very good job of guessing the lost revenue associated with selling in the
> earlier auctions.
>
> Mr. Fernand's provides a set of proposed measures for addressing the ICAP
> issue.  If any of them are worthy of be considered then they should be
aired
> through the committee process.  Nonetheless, one of the proposals should
be
> killed at the outset.  Because being an ICAP provider to New York includes
> an obligation to bid into the energy market, no ICAP owners should ever be
> "automatically bid into the Deficiency Auction" or any other auction.  Mr.
> Fernand's suggests that that the automatic bidding requirement be relieved
> if a Long ICAP Owner exclude itself.  The act of choosing not to bid into
> the ICAP auction is in itself an indication that the ICAP provider has
> chosen to exclude itself.
>
> Mark Younger
> Vice President
> Slater Consulting
> 69 Werking Road
> East Greenbush, NY  12061
> 518-286-1937 ph
> 518-286-1941 fax
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kkranz@nyiso.com [mailto:kkranz@nyiso.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 2:49 PM
> To: marketrelations@nyiso.com
> Subject: NYISO - MC - Document from Stephen Fernands to MC Members
>
>  Dear Management Committee Members.
>
> The attached document  is being forwarded to you at the request of Stephen
> Fernands of New Energy Inc.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kristen Kranz
> 518-356-6186
>
>
> (See attached file: Stephen Fernands to MC re ICAP.PDF)
>


When: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada); Tijuana.
Where: Mt. Hood ( Main )

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


Hey Geraldo,

It would be great to see Paul go far in his Navy career, the military can use
more guys of his caliber.........

I had not seen the writings on the bombs, that's great, I'm sure those guys are
motivated to do their jobs well............

Wow, that's great news about Sharon.  This is her first, right?

My sister is now engaged.  She and her fiance moved into an apartment off of
Memorial Drive.  He's an engineer (UT grad as well, civil engineering I think)
and works for Chicago Bridge & Iron.  So we are relieved she hooked up with a
good guy.  She's 27 going on 18, so yes, it's kind of wierd to see your little
sister growing up before your eyes.

We definitely need to get you out to the house.  We just had laminate wood and
tile flooring put in to part of the house, so it's a bit more presentable now.
The cheapo original carpet was getting pretty trashed.  My kids are getting big
fast, they're a lot of work but getting to be a lot of fun too.  All the talk
arouond the house is of Hallloween, they're looking forward to it.

OK bud, gotta get a presentation ready for a meeting this a.m.

Let's hook up soon,
EZ

Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
10/09/2001 09:40 AM

To:   Ernie J Zavaleta/Frito-Lay/US@Frito-Lay
cc:
Subject:  RE: Still here and still ready...

Ernie,  I think that's right.  It makes sense since he is Chief Weapons
Officer.  Bieraugel is one smart dude.  He helped me through many an
engineering class.  Wouldn't be surprised to see Admiral Bieraugel one day.

Did you see on CNN how the Navy guys are writing "For NYPD" and "FDNY" on
the bombs being dropped in Afghan!  Eat that!!

Yep, Saturday was pretty depressing.  I have to hand it to OU.  Stoops is
an outstanding coach.  I will still go to the games, though some of the
luster is lost. How is the family doing?  My little sister Sharon had a
little boy yesterday.  William Boone.  Pretty weird when your little sister
starts having babies.  We still need to get together when we get a chance.
Let me know when you get some time.

G

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Ernie.J.Zavaleta@fritolay.com@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 8:53 AM
   To:     Nemec, Gerald
   Subject:  Still here and still ready...

   Gerald,

   Does LCDR mean Lieutenant Commander?  On my last email his title was LT,
   just
   lieutenant.  I guess that means our boy has been promoted......

   The Horns weren't too impressive on Sat.............I was going to go to
   the
   Colorado game, but I think I might skip now, seems like the whole season
   is
   shot.........

   ---------------------- Forwarded by Ernie J Zavaleta/Frito-Lay/US on
   10/09/2001
   08:49 AM ---------------------------

   LCDR Bieraugel <BIERAUGEL@john-paul-jones.navy.mil>
   10/08/2001 10:44 PM

   To:   Ernie J Zavaleta/Frito-Lay/US@Frito-Lay, Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
   cc:
   Subject:  Still here and still ready...

   Amigos, I can't say anything about what we are doing out here.  I will
   tell
   you this...the President told the military to be ready.  We are.

   I appreciate the kind thoughts and words.  We're keeping the faith out
   here.
   Take care.  Paul.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may
contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended
recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for
the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message.
This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an
acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract
between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any
other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Jen,
my flight gets into Oakland at 11 p.m. on Thursday night; we could meet up for drinks... somewhere. in the city or EBay, depending upon who else wants to join in the festivities, I guess. i gotta rise and shine early on Friday morn', tho.
Tues. morning is also an option -- just prob. more difficult, unless you wanna play hookey from work, and we could meet at Abir's for coffee.
any other takers for drinks on Feb. 14th ? come on, there must be some lonely hearts out thar'  :-)
Jo
--- On Feb 04, 2002, Jen Faught wrote:
Those are great pics. Hey Jo I'm expecting to be around 14th and 19th and
would love to see ya. Let me know the plan. Whoops, should have just
replied
to you .Oh well
Jen
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
hi!
have i told you how much i miss all y'all ?
i can't commit; i've already planned a mini-vacation around Pres.Day
wknd., and while i may be able to meet up in Tahoe around March 15, I won't
know till last minute. . if you do get enuff people on the slate,
pls. keep me in the email loop. i'll just sleep on the floor;
love,
Jo
p.s. i just picked up photos today, from a 'mystery' roll i just found
p.p.s.  if anyone can meet me for a late-night drink on feb. 14th or
breakfast/lunch on Tuesday, the 19th, pls. let me know. (bay area, that
is).
--- On Jan 21, 2002, Tang, Grace wrote:
hi everone!
I'm trying to get a feel for who may be interested in a south lake
tahoe
ski
shindig. I looked into the place we rented 2 (?) years ago (when cooper
flew
down from portland via reno on the snowiest day of the year) and it is
available as soon as March 8. Yeah, not that soon (maybe this will give
the
sky a chance to bear snow). Between 12 people, 2 nights, a hottub,
fireplace, heavenly company, etc. it would cost about $40/person for
the
weekend. Let me know what weekends on/after March 8 would work for you
and
how many people including yourself may like to come.
let it snow let it snow let it snow!
-G


Tom,

Greg's phone number is 713 853 5220. He is very difficult to reach
(frequent trips).

You may find this information useful: Greg is a West Point graduate
and spent a few years in the  military, before obtaining an MBA from Stanford.
He is a very dynamic person and a very pragmatic thinker.

I hope you have a great holiday weekend.

Vince

"Piazze, Thomas" <piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu> on 06/29/2000 08:51:48 AM
To: "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: "Gerrity, Thomas" <gerrity@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Lohse, Gerald Lee"
<lohse@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Wind, Yoram" <windj@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Harker,
Patrick" <harker@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Amit, Raffi" <amit@wharton.upenn.edu>,
"'shankman, jeff'" <Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com>, "MacMillan, Ian"
<macmilli@wharton.upenn.edu>
Subject: RE: B2B at Enron

Vince:  Thanks for this message and update on your recent actions to
establish a closer research relationship between Enron and Wharton.  We are
anxious to work with your firm on many fronts and appreciate all that you
and Jeff Shankman are doing to facilitate closure on a number of
initiatives.

The below article is very interesting and reinforces the entrepreneurial
culture of Enron; it also points out one more reason why our faculty is so
interested in collaborating with you and other executives as the company
moves into this new space.

I would like to call Greg Whalley after the 4th of July weekend to establish
contact and begin a dialogue regarding his interest in joining our efforts
as a Corporate Partner. Will you please provide me contact information?

Please let me know if there is any additional information or material you
will need prior to your meeting with Jeff Skilling.  We are anxious to learn
how he responds to your suggestions.

Thanks again for all that you are doing.  Hope you have a great 4th of
July!!

TOM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince J Kaminski [SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 9:53 AM
> To: piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu
> Cc: Vince J Kaminski
> Subject: B2B at Enron
>
>
>
> Tom,
>
> I am sending you the information about our new B2B unit.
> I have talked yesterday with Greg Whalley who is heading the new
> unit about the E-commerce project at Wharton and recommended that Enron
> join
> this program.
>
> I have sent him this morning a copy of the materials you gave me.
>
> The meeting with Jeff Skilling has been pushed till the 2nd half of July.
> I talked to him briefly twice that Jeff Shankman and I want to discuss
> with
> him building a relationship with Wharton. Jeff Shankman is, by the way, a
> great
> friend of
> your institution.
>
>
> Vince
>
> **************************************************************************
> ***************************
>
>   COMPANIES & FINANCE: THE AMERICAS: Enron sees bricks and
>                        bytes mix reshaping energy market: Purchase of MG
> only a
> start in
>                        building B2B platforms, writes Hillary Durgin:
>
>
>
>
>                     COMPANIES & FINANCE: THE AMERICAS: Enron sees bricks
> and
> bytes
>                     mix reshaping energy market: Purchase of MG only a
> start in
> building
>                     B2B platforms, writes Hillary Durgin:
>                     99% match; Financial Times ; 16-Jun-2000 12:00:00 am ;
> 604
> words
>                     By HILLARY DURGIN
>
>                     If Jeffrey Skilling is right,
>
>                     Enron's acquisition of MG is only the tip of the
> iceberg.
> Enron's president and
>                     chief operating officer is engineering a fundamental
> strategy shift at the
>                     Houston energy company, aimed at making it a dominant
> "new
> economy"
>                     player across various industrial markets.
>
>                     The Dollars 446m acquisition last month of MG, the
> UK-based
> metals trader,
>                     is only the first of more than Dollars 1bn in
> estimated new
> investments the
>                     company is targeting. It is seeking vehicles on which
> to
> build
>                     business-to-business (B2B) platforms in sectors such
> as
> logistics, chemicals,
>                     agricultural products and pulp & paper.
>
>                     Mr Skilling wants to take the business model the
> company
> developed in
>                     natural gas and power and apply it to other wholesale
> commodity markets. He
>                     argues the electronic platforms it creates will not
> only
> become the principal
>                     B2B sites for those sectors, but reshape those
> industries.
>
>                     As an example, he points to Enron's new e-commerce
> platform,
>  EnronOnline,
>                     which has changed the way the company does business
> with its
>  customers
>                     while significantly increasing sales.
>
>                     The company - the largest wholesale merchant of
> natural gas
> and power - saw
>                     wholesale, physical deliveries of natural gas surge 53
> per
> cent in the first
>                     quarter.
>
>                     Critics argue that Enron's move away from its familiar
> energy business into
>                     new industries, where the learning curve is steep and
> the
> competition
>                     entrenched, is risky. Yet a number of industry
> analysts
> point out Enron has
>                     proved it understands markets and how to manage risks
> while
> becoming the
>                     largest importer of coal in the UK, the largest trader
> of
> gas and power in the
>                     US and grabbing an advantage in bandwidth.
>
>                     "It's a prudent strategy, but it's got to be done in
> an
> orderly way," says Ronald
>                     Barone, analyst with Paine-Webber in New York. "What
> they're
>  doing here is
>                     what they've been incredibly successful at doing," he
> adds,
> noting that Enron
>                     posted Dollars 1.3bn in earnings before interest and
> taxes
> (ebit) from its
>                     wholesale energy and services business in 1999, up 34
> per
> cent from the
>                     previous year.
>
>                     Earnings from that division accounted for two-thirds
> of the
> company's overall
>                     income before interest and taxes last year, and Mr
> Barone
> sees the unit's ebit
>                     increasing 15-30 per cent annually over several years.
>
>                     As with gas and power and now broadband, where Enron
> is
> standardising
>                     contracts and creating a market in bandwidth, it wants
> to
> create markets by
>                     entering as a physical player and providing merchant,
> risk
> management and
>                     financial services over the internet.
>
>                     "We will provide electronic commerce, but we will
> provide
> liquidity and we will
>                     provide settlement, or fulfilment of that contract,"
> Mr
> Skilling says. "That is an
>                     extremely powerful model. If you look at other B2B
> sites,
> they don't do that."
>
>                     Mr Skilling argues Enron's e-commerce platform will
> triumph
> over the other,
>                     bulletin board-type exchanges, where striking a deal
> depends
>  on two parties
>                     hooking up and working through uncertainties over
> timing,
> price, credit and
>                     fulfilment.
>
>                     Not everyone shares that view. Some energy companies,
> for
> example, would
>                     rather not do business with a competitor. BP Amoco
> recently
> purchased a 3
>                     per cent stake in Altra Energy Technologies, a
> Houston-
> based, neutral
>                     wholesale energy exchange. With Koch Industries and
> American
>  Electric
>                     Power, it also committed to carry out a fixed volume
> of
> transactions on the
>                     site to lend it liquidity.
>
>                     Just as in gas and power and now broadband and metals,
> Enron
>  believes it
>                     needs networks of strategic physical assets. In
> acquiring
> MG, Enron got a
>                     stable of warehouses, lending it a strong physical
> position.
>
>
>                     "It should provide (MG) with a more vibrant, more
> active
> physical spot market
>                     in more markets in the world," says Greg Whalley,
> chief
> executive officer of
>                     Enron Net Works, the new division Enron is launching
> to
> identify and enter
>                     commodity markets. He argues that in metals and other
> markets, Enron will
>                     deliver better pricing, price risk management
> services,
> cross-commodity
>                     transactions and flexible transactions for a wider
> range of
> customers.
>
>                     Mr Skilling says there are significant rewards for
> restructuring an industry.
>
>                     "If you can take that platform, and you use the
> capabilities
>  the bricks bring to
>                     the table, e-commerce the industry and change the
> structure,
>  you're selling for
>                     more than a 50 multiple."
>
>                     Copyright , The Financial Times Limited
>


Gerald, here are copies of Power of Attorney.. these doc's have been scanned and are in spanish... Is this what we are looking for?

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	arlanz@mexis.com (Armando Lanz)@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-arlanz+40mexis+2Ecom+20+28Armando+20Lanz+29+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:12 AM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	Power of attorney

Enclosed is the power of attorney of Genaro Larrea who will be  signing everything from Mexicana de Cobre
Saludos,

Armando Lanz Oliver
Lanz Consultores en Energia  S.C.
Rodolfo Gaona # 6 Despacho 103, Col. Lomas de Sotelo
Naucalpan, Edo  de Mex CP 53390
Tel: 555 757 88
Fax: 555 757 95
Cel: 044 5502  0308
Biper: 5447 1111 cve 801  9581
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

 - Rcv 0039_1.tif
 - Rcv 0039_2.tif
 - Rcv 0039_3.tif
 - Rcv 0039_4.tif
 - Rcv 0039_5.tif
 - Rcv 0039_6.tif
 - Rcv 0039_7.tif
 - Rcv 0039_8.tif
 - Rcv 0039_9.tif
 - Rcv 0039_10.tif
 - Rcv 0039_11.tif
 - Rcv 0039_12.tif
 - Rcv 0039_13.tif
 - Rcv 0039_14.tif
 - Rcv 0039_15.tif
 - Rcv 0039_16.tif
 - Rcv 0039_17.tif
 - Rcv 0039_18.tif
 - Rcv 0039_19.tif
 - Rcv 0039_20.tif
 - Rcv 0039_21.tif
 - Rcv 0039_22.tif


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<TITLE>It´s FAST, It´s EASY and It´s FREE...<=
/TITLE>

<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4134.600" name=3DGENERATOR>

Now's The Time
To Get Into An
Internet Home=20
            Business!

<ST=
RONG>*=20
        *=20
        *  *=20
        * =20
      *=20
        *=20
        *=20
        *  *=20
         *=20
        *

Discover how people are earning "full-time"=

income using their home computer!!!

* =20
      *=20
        *  *=20
        *=20
        *=20
        *=20
        *=20
        *  *=20
         *=20
        *

F=
act:=20
          Hundreds of Thousands of people are no=
w=20
        cashing in using=20

          &nb=
sp;  =20
        the Internet to make money=
 from=20
        home!

F=
act:=20
          There will be 502 Million Internet use=
rs by=20
        2003!<O:P></O:P>

F=
act:=20
           An Internet Business is the next=
 great=20
        opportunity of our=20

          &nb=
sp;   =20
        time!  There are 125,000 people starting their own=20
        Home-
         &nbs=
p;    =20
        Based Business every week!<O:P></O:P>

F=
act:=20
           Thousands of people are losing m=
oney=20
        with =91phony=92 and Illegal=20

          &nb=
sp;  =20
          programs on the Internet.<O:P></O:P>

F=
act:=
 =20
          We're showing people how to ma=
ke=20
        money on the Internet.

<BIG><BIG>       =
    =20
      Discover how you can succeed where most=20
      fail!<O:P></O:P></BIG></BIG>

<BIG>Get=20
      FREE information on the FASTEST and=20
      SAFEST </BIG>
<BIG>way to make MONEY from your home=20
      computer!</BIG>

<BIG>>>>=20
        <BIG>=
CLICK=20
      HERE</BIG></BIG>   <S=
PAN=20
      lang=3DEN-US=20
      style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; BACKGROUND: white; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMIL=
Y: Arial"><BIG><<<=20
      </BIG>

<BIG>A=20
      new email message window will open with the word SUBSCRIBE=20
      </BIG>
<BIG>in the subject line.  Simply click=

      'send' and your done.  After </BIG>
<BIG>receiving your email=
, we=20
      will send you this information.  If </BIG>
<BIG>the</BIG>=20
      <BIG>above link does not show the word SUBSCRIBE </BIG>
<BIG>in th=
e=20
      subject line, please type it in</BIG>!

Your E-m=
ail=20
            Address Removal/Deletion=20
            Instructions:

    The m=
arketing=20
            company who sent you this advertisement=20

complies with all proposed fe=
deral=20
            legislation regarding unsolicited
    commercial e=
-mail=20
            by providing you with a method for your
e-ma=
il=20
            address to be permanently removed from our database=20

and any future mailings from our=20
            company.

    To pe=
rmanently=20
            remove your address, please CLICK HERE=20

to send your=20
        request.

</DI=
V>


Richard, Robin and Jean,
 I called Charles Dick early this morning to ask him about his
personal availability.  I told him that I needed to hear back from him
today.  His message indicates as he hold us that he is in a mediation all
day today in Orange County.

Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Gerald,

	The last time we discussed, you wanted to make some modifications to the CA language
	based on specifics of what we are intentions are with Flowserve.  We probably need to
	discuss to make sure that your understanding and my perception are in line.

	mk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Monday, May 14, 2001 3:12 PM
To:	Knippa, Mark
Subject:	Flowserve CA


I had a prior obligation at lunch on Mon.  We need to reschedule the Leadership Dev. mtg.  Fran, could you work with Emily and find a time?  Sorry, I know I've disrupted this twice n ow!  I'm good for lunch on Wed if that would work for everyone.  df


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000 02:07
PM ---------------------------

Twyla_S._Strogen@DOM.COM on 05/15/2000 01:13:44 PM
To: Customer_Advisory_Board@DOM.COM
cc:
Subject: Notice

ATTENTION WEB E-SCRIPT USERS:

On Thursday, May 18, 2000, Web E-SCRIPT Users will be required to download an
updated
version of the plug-in to access the system.  You will be prompted to download
upon
launching the web page.  With slower connections, the download could take 20+
minutes.
Please contact the E-SCRIPT Help Line if you would like to receive a CD with
the
 plug-in.


The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed
or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000020721&Page=
MyReq.


&Firstname,

 VALENTINE'S DAY is FEBRUARY 14th!

Send a DOZEN magnificent LONG-STEMMED sweetheart ROSES for an astonishingly
low $39.99 plus GUARANTEED delivery by FedEx on VALENTINE'S DAY, and
Proflowers will also send your special someone FREE GHIRARDELLI CHOCOLATES
in a beautiful HEART-SHAPED VELVET BOX!

http://www.proflowers.com/jump/vday2002.cfm?REF=FCHOptinValDay01

Proflowers' unique "Direct from the grower" system gives you twice the
freshness at HALF THE PRICE.  Every bouquet you send comes with a seven-day
freshness guarantee.  You also get super quick delivery by FedEx, automatic
e-mail confirmations that tell you exactly when your flowers have shipped
and exactly when they're delivered.

Quantities are limited, &Firstname, so place your order for Valentine's Day
delivery now - the lowest price, a FREE BOX OF CHOCOLATES with every bouquet
that you send, and GUARANTEED DELIVERY ON VALENTINE'S DAY in a gorgeous
display box.  Click here now!

http://www.proflowers.com/jump/vday2002.cfm?REF=FCHOptinValDay01

&Firstname:  Give that special someone the gift that says I LOVE YOU, THANK
YOU, HAPPY VALENTINE'S DAY, and I CARE all at once - magnificent,
extra-fresh long-stemmed roses!

Remember:  Proflowers will include a FREE box of chocolates with ANY
gorgeous floral bouquet that you send.

Click here to order now!

http://www.proflowers.com/jump/vday2002.cfm?REF=FCHOptinValDay01

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This email is not sent unsolicited. This is an Opt in Network mailing! This
message is sent to subscribers ONLY.

The e-mail subscription address is: tlokey@enron.com
To unsubscribe please click the link below
http://optweb1.optmails.com/cpa/remove.jsp?email=tlokey@enron.com
or
Send an email with remove as the subject to remove@brain2002.com
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


paperloop.com
BRUSSELS, July 16, 2001 (paperloop.com) - The latest UTIPULP consumer pulp inventories showed a 0.2 percent increase in June to 1,046,052 tonnes on the previous month. But stocks were 18 percent lower than the year-earlier period.


Plz look up decision no. 01-04-006 on the commission's website.  it has to do
with interruptible and curtailment issues and rotating outages, i.e.,
blackouts.

Thanks a million,
Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2000
12:58 PM ---------------------------

Chris Herron@ENRON
04/25/2000 10:09 AM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: LIBOR curve

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Herron/Corp/Enron on 04/25/2000
10:08 AM ---------------------------

Pushkar Shahi@ECT
04/24/2000 06:02 PM
To: Chris Herron/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: LIBOR curve

Chris Herron@ENRON
04/24/2000 03:56 PM
To: Pushkar Shahi/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: LIBOR curve

Pushkar:

I wanted to check with you about the LIBOR one-month forward curve through
2004.  Please send it to me when you have a moment.

Thanks.

Regards,
Chris Herron


calendar and rsvp
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/07/2001 08:10 AM -----

	Tracy L Arthur@ECT
	02/05/2001 08:34 AM

		 To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron,
Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S
Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise
Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Lou L
Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES,
Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Steve Elliott/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jim
Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stanley
Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Danny
McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Diomedes Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James M
Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sanjay
Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT,
Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharron
Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie
Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dolores Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Bridget
Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy
Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT,
Carol Ann Brown/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Dorothy
Dalton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Cindy
Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Julie
Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary E
Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, bgarzac@enron.com, Sharon
Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy
McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Cooper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie
Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christina
Grow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Molly
Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Leah Rijo/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Invitation - New Associate Welcome Reception


here is the file I showed you.


Hallelujah!  Maybe now we won't go through as much paper as before.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	St. Clair, Carol
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:41 AM
To:	Panus, Stephanie; Bailey, Susan; Heard, Marie; Boyd, Samantha
Subject:	No One left to tie up printer

Hey gals:
I just want you to know that I have started putting the printer up here to good use!
Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-3393 (office fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Katherine,

Going forward will the Breakfast Meeting take place in EB50M and the Exec.
Meeting in the Boardroom?

Whalley will be in attendance at both meetings.

Liz

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Katherine Brown @ ENRON                           01/19/2000 04:14 PM

To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diomedes
Christodoulou/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Fowler/Enron@Gateway, Mark Frevert/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin P Hannon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ken Harrison/Enron@Gateway, David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Joe Hirko/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stanley
Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kurt S Huneke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rebecca P
Mark/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, J
Mark Metts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES,
Kenneth D Rice/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@Enron, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
E White/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda
Garza-Castillo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marcia
Manarin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacy Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Beena
Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Molly
Bobrow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rosane
Fabozzi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelby
Earle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelby Earle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Trosper/Enron@Gateway, Nicki Daw/LON/ECT@ECT, Carol Ann Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dolly Henrici/Enron@Gateway, Ann Joyner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy Young/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ann Joyner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy
Stark/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sherryl Stone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen
McVicker/HOU/EES@EES, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee
Fleming/Corp/Enron@Enron, Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marsha
Lindsey/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores
Fisher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy B Dalton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Sherri
Reinartz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine Brown/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam
Benson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy G
Smith@EES, Bobbie Power/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Joe Witherspoon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rodney Keys/Corp/Enron@ENRON, DeMonica
Lipscomb/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@Enron, Suzanne
Danz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Keith Dziadek/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETINGS - MONDAY, JANUARY 24, 2000

Please respond regarding your attendance at the following events:

Executive Committee Breakfast
Date:  Monday, January 24
Time:  7:30 a.m.
Location: EB50M

Please indicate below whether or not you will attend the breakfast.

  Yes, I will attend _X___

  No, I will not attend _____

*  *  *

Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date:  Monday, January 24
Time:  11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video:  Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call: A conference call bridge has been reserved.  The dial in number
713/853-3233.
  Please contact Sherri Sera (713/853-5984) or Katherine Brown (713/345-7774)
  for the weekly passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.

 Yes, I will attend in person __X_____

 By video conference from _______

 By conference call  _______

 No, I will not attend  _______

*  *  *

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday,
January 21.

Thank you,
Katherine


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041606.txt


As of 1:00 pm Monday, August 13, Enron Wholesale Services had reached $859,878 in pledges for the United Way, which is 67.39% of our campaign goal of $1,276,000 and the EWS participation rate is 34.88%.

If you are part of the 65% who have yet to access the system, we need your help!  Not only do we want to reach our monetary goal, but more importantly, we want to reach 100% participation.  To access the system, use the following instructions:

Click on https://hrglobal.enron.com to make a contribution or learn more about this year's campaign. You will need your GIS ID (which is your "9" number, not your "P" number) and password.  If you have never accessed the HR global system, then your password is your birthdate (format: YYYYMMDD).

If you are not sure what your ID and password are, please go to https://ehronline.enron.com, click the "Accept" button, and then click on "Forgot your User ID or Password?"  If you have questions regarding access, please call the HRGIM help desk at ext. 3-5666.

Below are the pledge totals and participation rates by business unit/functional group:

	GROUP			PLEDGES	% Participation
	EA			$152,531	31.01%
	EBS			$68,398		10.43%
	EEOS			$62,221		66.17%
	EGM			$114,552	39.35%
	EIM			$79,184		47.09%
	ENW			$174,680	33.90%
	EWS Bus. Analysis	$38,667		83.49%
	EWS Bus. Dev.		$13,558		100.00%
	EWS HR		$17,417		50.70%
	EWS Legal		$53,610		51.09%
	EWS Research		$22,373		61.70%
	EWS Treasury		$17,981		100.00%

From a corporate perspective, EWS is in 3rd place for both participation and in % of goal reached.  Here are the other groups' totals:

	GROUP			PLEDGES	% Participation		% of Goal
	ETS			$237,379	61.09%			68,61%
	Corporate		$555,569	38.42%			70.77%
	EES			$252,636	30.18%			51.24%
	Enron-wide		$1,905,462	37.19			65.71%

Please log-on today and make your pledge.  Houstonians in need are counting on you.


Edie,

Here is the updated EOL data for the Texas Region.
2000 DATA
2000 EOL Trades = 13,500
2000 EOL Volume = 2.5 TCF

2001 DATA
2001 Plan EOL Trades = 17,500
2001 Plan EOL Trades/Month = 1,460
2001 EOL Volume = 3 TCF

Could you please update the plan numbers for Tom?

Thanks,

Eric


Sally, I got together with Hunter this morning and as a result of our discussion we have reworked the Netco Logistics list. The plan now is to get together today with the rest of the deskheads and review what you, Hunter and I have done so far. I made sure Hunter knew that you have already provided Lavo with a list based on our discussion Sunday.

Let me know if you have any questions, tks - Bob

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Superty, Robert
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:10 AM
To:	Shively, Hunter S.
Subject:	Logistics Discussion

Hunter, here is the cleaned up list, let me know if you want to get together and discuss - Bob


Sounds like both need to stabilizers.

Kay

	From:  Bill Williams @ ECT                           04/09/2001 08:00 PM

To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com
cc: Don Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Revised Salmon Agreement

Lee  - I agree with your statement that LV needs the PSS.  But not with
regards to Delta.  I do not know what Delta needs for siting their
generation.  It is my understanding that generators in the WSCC need PSS's.
I am trying to locate chapter and verse on that requirement.  It may be a
size issue (ie - greater than "x" MWs of generator size). Don Hammond will
help me locate the requirement in the morning, and I will get back to you.
My concern was your e mails seemed to imply I said Delta doesn't need PSS. I
want to stay silent on that issue.

In any regard, Nevada Power Co requires PSS, that is the reason we are
obtaining them for all the generators at LVCII.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Williams/PDX/ECT on 04/09/2001 06:02
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann@ENRON
04/09/2001 05:02 PM
To: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Revised Salmon Agreement

Steve,
I know that we specifically included the stabilizer in the Salmon deal.
Please confirm that it belongs there so that we can finish up the break out
contract.

Thanks,

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/09/2001 06:48
PM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ps.ge.com on 04/09/2001 05:55:57 PM
To: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
cc: kay.mann@enron.com

Subject: Revised Salmon Agreement

Kent/Kay-

I've redline the Salmon contract for Exhibits A and B, Purchase Amount,
Maximum Liability Amount, and Unit Liability Amount.  The Power System
Stabilizer has been struck from scope, because I can recall Bill Williams
advising that LV would need them, Delta/Salmon would not.  That's consitent
with the other units going to CA (w/ Intergen).

Regards,

Lee <<Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy
Agreement_ljredline040901.DOC>>

 - Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy
Agreement_ljredline040901.DOC


only if you go

Shanna Husser@ENRON
05/24/2000 08:09 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SUMMER ANALYST INVITATION

Are you going to this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron on 05/24/2000
08:08 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Cheryl Kuehl                           05/19/2000 03:27 PM

To:
cc:  (bcc: Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron)

Subject: SUMMER ANALYST INVITATION


When Mark.Taylor@enron.com sent e-mail to GILBERGD@SULLCROM.COM (10/13/1)
Sullivan & Cromwell has received spam from your domain or e-mail address in
the past. If you need to send e-mail to us
please contact PC Support at (212)558-4277.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.


The stuff is being delivered in accordance with the notice provision of the
letter agreements, which means the  original goes to "President".  A copy is
also being delivered to George, so he would be a good one to make
distribution at Intergen.

Kay

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
01/08/2001 05:48 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

Who at Intergen are the agreements being delivered to?

Kay Mann@ENRON
01/08/2001 05:35 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

I had Ozzie sign it, and it has been sent to Carolyn.

Kay

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
01/08/2001 05:32 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

I'm happy doing it, or Fred can sign.

Kay Mann@ENRON
01/08/2001 03:41 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

Do you want to print, sign and fax, or shall I take to Janet or someone else
to sign?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/08/2001 03:37
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/08/2001 03:30:43 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

 <<2TCV01!.DOC>>
Kay:

Per your request, enclosed is a proposed letter to SEL enclosing the final
facility agreements.  I have included a "receipt acknowledged" signature in
the proposed letter, although I believe this is optional as long as our
courier, upon delivery, obtains a signature acknowledging receipt.  Please
advise of any comments.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure: 131359v1

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2TCV01!.DOC


Jeff - here is the board resolution to make a cash distribution to enovate's members.  We are going to try to get this done today if possible.

Thanks - Gregg

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	j.hengtgen@pecorp.com@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:42 PM
To:	Penman, Gregg
Cc:	t.hermann@pecorp.com; w.morrow@pecorp.com
Subject:	FW: enovate consent

Gregg

Here is the proposed consent resolution.  It has been ok'd by our legal
guys.

>  <<enovate member consent re dist final (cln 11-08-01).doc>>
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance
upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - enovate member consent re dist final (cln 11-08-01).doc


Glendale's City Attorney is Steve Lins.  His phone number is 818-548-2080 and his email is slins@ci.glendale.ca.us.  Please let me know if you need anything else.  I will be in their offices on Wednesday.

Thanks,  Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 8:03 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Cc:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: City of Glendale

Kim:  Can you obtain the name of Glendale's bond counsel (lawyer's name, phone number, email, etc.)?  Thanks.  SS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 1:59 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	City of Glendale

Sara,

Believe it or not, we are very close getting our signed ISDA from the City of Glendale.  Steve Lins, the City attorney had a couple of questions which I will attempt to relay without having a copy of the documents.

1)  I am assuming that he obtained a for legal opinion letter or document of some sort.  This document references a confirmation and we are not sure what this references.  Typically, it references a transaction, which in this case, there are no transactions yet.  He feels this reference should be deleted.  What is your opinion regarding this? [Shackleton, Sara]    If we have no transaction on the books, then he can delete the reference.  Marie:  Have we received an opinion from Glendale?

2)  We sent him a couple of form documents to facilitate the documents required under the ISDA.  One form ws a form resolution.  They have already received City Council approval to enter into financial tranactions and to enter into an ISDA with us.  Steve is going to get a certified copy of this Resolution.  Will this suffice? [Shackleton, Sara]    I'll review their resolution again.  If it references our ISDA and all transactions, it should be fine.  (This is part of the reason why we need a legal opinion)

When you return, I may try to do one last conference call to alleviate any unanswered questions.  I think we will have an executed ISDA with the City of Glendale by the end of next week.  I am going to be out there meeting with them on Wednesday.

Thanks for your help,

Kim


This is a request for a battery charger for Richard's IBM Thinkpad Laptop.

He will be leaving for vacation tomorrow at 12:00 noon, is it any way
possible to get this to him by this afternoon?

Please charge to Company # 413 RC# 1929

If you have any questions, please call me at 713-853-9402.

Thanks
Twanda


----- Original Message -----
From: Jason  Dobbs
To: jmjaked@mindspring.com
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 9:25 AM
Subject: Fw: Oklahoma

----- Original Message -----
From: Marilyn  Coxen
To: Tony  Wolfe  ; Marilyn Trout  ; Vicki Timmerman  ; John Stevenson  ; P Renfroe  ;  brad overton  ; Troy  Nelson  ; Sherill  Morrison  ; wayne haynes  ; Darrell DeLay  ; Gary Cupp  ; les crutchfield  ; Dorothy Crawford  ;  jim coxen  ;  gil cornett  ; Rick Burden  ; RON BURDEN  ;  Bridenstine,  Bland
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:21 PM
Subject: Fw: Oklahoma

----- Original Message -----
From: sabennett@aep.com
To: WOOZLE361@EARTHLINK.NET
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:06 AM
Subject: Oklahoma
----- Forwarded by  Scott A Bennett/AEPIN on 01/23/2002 08:05 AM -----
	Brigit M Graham    01/23/2002 08:03 AM  	                 To:         Scott A Bennett/AEPIN@AEPIN          cc:                   Subject:          Oklahoma

From the State where drunk driving is considered a  sport, comes a true story
from Oklahoma. Recently a routine police patrol  parked outside a local
neighborhood tavern.
Late in the evening the  officer noticed a man leaving the bar so intoxicated
that he could barely  walk. The man stumbled around the parking lot for a few
minutes, with the  officer quietly observing.
After what seemed an eternity and trying his  keys on five vehicles, the man
managed to find his car which he fell into. He  was there for a few minutes
as a number of other patrons left the bar and  drove off.
Finally he started the car, switched the wipers on and off (it  was a fine
dry night) flicked the blinkers on, then off, honked the horn and  then
switched on the lights. He moved the vehicle forward
a few inches,  reversed a little and then remained still for a few more
minutes as some more  vehicles left. At last he pulled out of
the parking lot and started to drive  slowly down the road.
The police officer, having patiently waited all  this time, now started up
the patrol car, put on the flashing lights,  promptly pulled the man over and
carried out a Breathalyzer test. To his  amazement the Breathalyzer indicated
no evidence of the man having consumed  alcohol at all!
Dumbfounded, the officer said "I'll have to ask you to  accompany me to the
Police station this Breathalyzer equipment must be  broken."
"I doubt it," said the man, "Tonight I'm the designated  decoy."


- 11_27_01LO.xls


i'm flexible, but i'm guessing it will be more crowded then.  y?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:09 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	RE:

Not around 12:30 then?

-----Original Message-----
From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:08 AM
To: JHawker@petersco.com
Subject: RE:

probly around 2 or after work around 4:30.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:02 AM
   To:     Richey, Cooper
   Subject:

   What time do you think you will be going to the gym today?
   Jai Hawker
   Peters & Co. Limited
   (403) 261-2259

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Deb,

Could you please check with the state of incorporation (I believe Delaware)
and the Corp Secretary's office to see if the papers have been processed in
both places?

Thanks,

Kay

Russell E Murrell
09/15/2000 09:03 AM
To: Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT,
gregg.penman@enron.com, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Midwest Energy Hub name change

I received the name change document and it has been executed on behalf of
Peoples and Enron.  I have also received and returned some state (IL)
registration documents from you and Lillian Bailey.

My understanding is that we have done everything we need to do to effect the
entity name change to enovate, L.L.C.  Kay Mann is trying to follow up and
confirm that all of the proper paperwork is in place.

Please let me know if there is anything further I can do to facilitate the
process.

thanks,
Russell
(312) 541-1159


Attached is the execution version of the above-referenced agreement.  Please
call me at (713) 853-5705 if you have any questions.

Stacy


Steve,

Please remove Bob Shiring and Liz Rivera from rc #768.

Thank you

Phillip Allen


Start Date: 4/8/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040803.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/8/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SKEETER
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


are you going to be boring today?


please put in rolodex.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 12/18/2000
08:06 AM ---------------------------

Jay Perl <jperl@sempratrading.com> on 11/15/2000 09:28:36 AM
To: "Jeff Shankman (E-mail)" <jeff.shankman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Hey Poookie

I'd have emailed you earlier, but you keep changing your email address.
Well, I'm here at Sempra marketing power.
Thanks again for all your help. Hope your new house is a babe magnet.
Going to Vegas for Day of the Trader. Shank dogggy dog dog.

See ya.

Jay Perl
Sempra Energy Trading
office: 203-355-5074
cell: 914-261-6025
email: jperl@sempratrading.com

****************************************************************************
This e-mail contains privileged attorney-client communications and/or
confidential information, and is only for the use by the intended recipient.
Receipt by an unintended recipient does not constitute a waiver of any
applicable privilege.

Reading, disclosure, discussion, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this information by anyone other than the intended recipient or his or her
employees or agents is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify us and delete the original
material from your computer.

Sempra Energy Trading Corp. (SET) is not the same company as SDG&E or
SoCalGas, the utilities owned by SET's parent company.  SET is not regulated
by the California Public Utilities Commission and you do not have to buy
SET's products and services to continue to receive quality regulated service
from the utilities.
****************************************************************************


Brian, Hector, and Lenny have dropped out (what a shocker).  Steve Venturatos
has graciously offered to take their place.

Thanks Steve.


Steve,

Thanks.

I got out of my LU positions last week.

What do you think of MOT, NT and TXN? Thinking about
jumping in after a big drop.

Vince

Steve Bigalow@ENRON
01/22/2001 07:55 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: best pick

 Best pick for  1/ 23  is mckc,  Lucent should be shorted.


Attached please find a sheet of facts regarding deregulation.

 <<Facts 2.doc>>

 - Facts 2.doc


[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	 [IMAGE]  October 19, 2001 [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
	  Daren, our Deluxe Motorola TalkAbout, Two-Way Radios valued at $100.00 are currently being held awaiting details for shipment to you, absolutely FREE.   Click here  now and verify your address (we want to make sure your Deluxe Motorola TalkAbout, Two-Way Radios are delivered to you) and to make arrangements for you to receive your two-way radios at no charge.   Your Approval Status* entitles you to receive your Deluxe Motorola TalkAbout, Two-Way Radios valued at $100.00 and save on your long distance bill by signing up with Sprint 7? Anytime SM Online Plan. As an added bonus, your monthly fee of $5.95  can be either reduced or waived completely. Click here  to learn how.  Respond before October 29, 2001 or you may waive your eligibility to receive your Deluxe Motorola TalkAbout, Two-Way Radios! These arrangements  may not be available after the above date.   Keep this document in a safe place. This could be the only notification you may receive, click here now !            FILED      PREPARATIONS FOR:                You!   	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   FEATURES: ? 14 FRS Channels ? 31 Segment LCD Display   Icons ? Talk Confirmation Tone Option ? Audio Accessory   Connector ? Lock Button ? Audible Cell Alert ? Time Out Timer ? Transmit LED ? Backlit LCD Display

 *Requires long distance service charge to Sprint and completion of redemption certificate.  If you do not wish to receive future promotions, click here  to unsubscribe.

[IMAGE]


sorry, none

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Friday, March 08, 2002 9:28 AM
To:	Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Y'barbo, Paul
Subject:	Bullets

Please send me your bullets ASAP this morning.  If you have no bullets to report, please reply to me that you have none.

Thanks, Kim.


Hourly Power Launched on ICE Tomorrow!!

As a reminder, IntercontinentalExchange will be launching Hourly Power tomorrow for all hubs currently traded in the West as well as PJM in the East.  All commissions for Hourly transactions will be waived for one month.  Effective December 1, traders will pay a flat fee of $4.00 per side for each trade.  Please call your ICE representative with any questions.

24-hour Help Desk  770-738-2101


Start Date: 12/22/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122211.txt


Per your request.  Thursday mornings at 9:30 CST

877-795-3687  pin 849496