Lord help us.  Call whenever you'd like to discuss the call (that Palmer
forgot to tell you about).

	David Parquet@ECT
	11/01/2000 03:24 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES@ENRON,
Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Message Points

Looks good, except for the comments on "discourages generation".  Make it
"discourages peaking generation".

Although I agree that any price cap has a "discouraging " impact on the
generation market, it is a matter of degree in this sound bite environment.
To the point, without a creative exit strategy, I would not waste development
money on a 10000-13000 BTU/KWh heat rate peaking project.  However, even with
the FERC order, I will continue to spend money developing base load, 7000
BTU/KWh heat rate projects.  The state is tremendously short on power, the
price cap goes away (theoretically) in two years, $150 is well above the
average expected price in our forcast models (although I agree not above the
price for particular hours if scalers are applied.)

	James D Steffes@ENRON
	11/01/2000 11:39 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Message Points

I agree with much of what Jeff has written.  Here are some additions -

On FERC getting a lot right, look at the Order in relation to our 4 key
points filed in the White Paper -
Removing Market Transparency - Still need FERC to take action
Development of Forwards Market and Risk Management - Great results
Removing distortions on Prices - Wrong action
Ending Cal ISO / Cal PX Stakeholder Boards - Great results

On the risk management issue, FERC itself said "The single most important
remedy that California market needs is the elimination of rules that prevent
market participants from managing risk". [FERC PRESS RELEASE]

ADD - FERC Staff did a great job on preparing a detailed analysis of the
market issues.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	11/01/2000 01:17 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
skean@enron.com, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Message Points

Here are the messages as I understand them.  Please let me know if I've
misconstrued anything.  Thanks.

FERC got  a lot right in the order and we're very encouraged as a result.
In particular, ending the PX buy/sell requirement and permitting utilities to
manage risk through a portfolio of short and long term contracts is a
fundamental step in the right direction.
However, the proposed price cap is unworkable and will jeopardize realibility
in California.  As structured, it will:
discourage the development of new generation to serve California
fail to provide adequate incentives for demand responsiveness.
force Enron to abandon 300 MWs of new power projects planned for California.
We look forward to participating in FERC's process and are hopeful that
FERC's final order will fix the deficiencies in the current price cap
proposal.
We encourage California to work with FERC to implement the proposals and
quickly fix the flaws in the market on behalf of the state's consumers.


Hey baby,

Getting back to the Alliance issue, what is happening.  I know I have my
nerve because I was supposed to provide a list.  Sorry, I forgot, but
anyway.....................here's a list:

Nicor  Dave Brown  630-983-8676 X2106
PGLC  Dave Wear 312-240-4554
Dynegy  Scott Maxfield 713-767-8030
Duke  John Alrich 713-260-8578

You know the rest.

Call me when you get a chance


?
***********************************
?
Lynn Bracken
Energy Manager
Summit Energy Services,  Inc.
9920 Corporate Campus Drive
Suite 2000
Louisville, KY  40223
502-429-3800


Steve:

I have now heard back from both Louise and Andy and neither one will be
available.  Unfortunately, Mark has now left again and I am on my way out on
vacation for a couple of weeks.  It might make sense for you to contact Mark
directly since you will be able to get to him before I can.

Sorry about that.

Mark

	SKramer@milbank.com
	09/20/2000 11:25 AM

		 To: mark.taylor@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Energy Bar Program

Mark,

Just wanted to mention to you that if either Louise Kitchens, Andy Zipper or
Mark Haedicke are interested in participating in the Energy Bar program but
is not yet in a position to make a firm commitment, we can list the speaker
as "invited" for the first mailing and then make any corrections that are
necessary on a subsequent mailing that will be distributed.? Of course, the
Bar Association would not list a speaker as "invited" without prior
authorization.? Would it be possible to get back to me today on an
EnronOnline speaker?? Thank you for taking the time out of your busy schedule
to provide assistance.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Kramer, Steven
Sent:?? Wednesday, September 20, 2000 12:23 PM
To:???? 'mark.taylor@enron.com'
Subject:??????? FW: Energy Bar Program

Mark,

Just wanted to mention to you that if either Louise Kitchens, Andy Zipper or
Mark Haedicke are interested in participating in the Energy Bar program but
is not yet in a position to make a firm commitment, we can list the speaker
as "invited" for the first mailing and then make any corrections that are
necessary on a subsequent mailing that will be distributed.? Of course, the
Bar Association would not list a speaker as "invited" without prior
authorization.? Would it be possible to get back to me today on an
EnronOnline speaker?? Thank you for taking the time out of your busy schedule
to provide assistance.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Kramer, Steven
Sent:?? Friday, September 15, 2000 11:30 AM
To:???? 'mark.taylor@enron.com'
Subject:??????? Energy Bar Program

Mark,

I am not sure if you had a chance to contact Louise Kitchens or Andy Zipper
regarding the Energy Bar Association program, but I just wanted to check.? If
neither of them are available, has Mark Haedicke returned from travel?? If
so, would you recommend that I give him a call.

I know that you are very busy and greatly appreciate your assistance.

Steve

Steven M. Kramer
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP
International Square Building
1825 Eye Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
TEL:? 202-835-7508
FAX:? 202-835-7586
skramer@milbank.com

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.


---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 03:47 PM ---------------------------

Thomas A Martin
10/13/2000 02:23 PM
To:	Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Key HPL People for the Winter

Brian,

As we discussed the other day, there are several key commercial, logistics, risk management and gas control personnel that we must have to run our business this winter.  I have heard that some of our people are being pursued by outside companies in light of the potential HPL sale.  The key people that we want to ensure stay around through the transition are:

Ed Gottlob
Elsa Villareal
James McKay
Gary Hanks
Darren Farmer
Stacey Neuweiler
Pat Clines
Dave Baumbach
O' Neal Winfree

Let me know what you think.

Tom


The Station 3 maintenance will continue for gas day Thursday, May 3rd.
Therefore, the Kingsgate receipt capacity will remain limited to 2280 MMcf/d

until further notice.

If you have any questions, please call our transportation coordinators at
(503) 833-4300.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Attached are draft message points for California.  Note that the "what
happens to Sierra's California customers" discussion is weak, but based on
the facts.

I plan on distributing these in draft to Sierra for their comments by COB
today.  Please contact me with any comments ASAP.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/22/2000 10:55
AM ---------------------------

"William J. Harmon" <wjharmon@JonesDay.com> on 11/22/2000 09:43:30 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Peoples Letter Agreement

Looks great to me.  I'm glad to know (as a NS customer) that my gas won't
be cut off this COLD November.

Bill Harmon
wjharmon@jonesday.com
312-269-4160
Fax: 312-782-8585

                    Kay.Mann@enron.c
                    om                   To:     wjharmon@jonesday.com
                                         cc:
                                         Subject:     Peoples Letter Agreement
                    11/22/00 08:35
                    AM

Any problem with this?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/22/2000 08:35
AM ---------------------------

From: Gregg Penman on 11/21/2000 05:00 PM

To:   Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:   Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:  Peoples Letter Agreement

Kay - Here is my attempt to turn the term sheet into something executable.
I have accepted all of William Harmon's changes except for the second
paragraph under amended terms.  William used the wording "The payment late
payment amount is calculated...".  I changed it to "The payment interest on
overdue amounts is calculated..." to be consistent with the reference in
the above paragraph.  I don't think this changes any substance, but I defer
to you.  I think that is all I changed.  I also added a quick intro. and a
paragraph on future payments to reiterate this is only for October
purchases.  Neither may be necessary, let me know.  I am not sure your
availability tomorrow, but I would love to hear from you ASAP in the
morning to get this in front of Peoples for signature.  Russell Diamond is
coordinating the internal Enron approvals with Global Finance, Credit and
RAC.

Thanks again for your help on your vacation day.

Gregg

(See attached file: Payment Delay Term Sheet.doc)

(See attached file: Payment Delay Term Sheet.doc)

==========
The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains
information that may be confidential, be protected by the attorney-client
or other applicable privileges, or constitute non-public information.  It
is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by
replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Use,
dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
==========

 - Payment Delay Term Sheet.doc


Here are the notes I promised:

(See attached file: VALUE.ppt)
Mukesh
(See attached file: VALUE.ppt)
 - VALUE.ppt


Good afternoon,

This is to inform you that the California Power Exchange, Trade Application
Training will be held Wednesday, October 18th and Thursday, October 19th, 2000
at the Hyatt Regency in Houston Texas.  This class offers an overview of the
CalPX Day-Ahead, Day Of and Real Time markets. This class is designed for new
hires and will also serve as a review for experienced employees.

We welcome you and your staff to attend this Training Class.  To register,
please reply to this e-mail with your name, business name and telephone
number.

     The schedule is as follows:

     Hyatt Regency
     Cottonwood Room
     1200 Louisiana Street
     Houston, Texas  77002
     713-654-1234 (For Reservations)

     Wednesday,          October 18th
     9:00 - 4:30         Day Ahead Market

     Thursday,           October 19th
     9:00 - 4:30         Day Of Market and Real Time Market

Continental Breakfast and Lunch will be served both days.

Thank you, we look forward to seeing you there.

Steven Sweet
Market Services
626-537-3264


most up to date one - with Molly & Jermey on it
---------------------- Forwarded by Barry Pearce/LON/ECT on 27/04/2000 15:26
---------------------------

Barry Pearce
27/04/2000 15:22
To: Jim Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:


Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/


Sally - please see the attached list as opposed to the one attached in Bob's earlier memo.  This one is the latest and greatest.  Thanks!


Why is the fact that I'm moving down there making you you lean towards
staying up here?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 12:09 PM
To: Katie.Trullinger@wfsg.com
Subject: RE: FW: What's up?

I don't know for sure if I am.  I am just in the "seriously thinking about
it" stages.  However the fact that you are moving down there is definetly
making me lean toward staying up here.  Tell your mom if you move and I
stay she can adopt me.


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 01:20 PM -----

	John M Singer@ENRON
	12/21/2000 12:52 PM

		 To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Shanner

I don't think so.  I bought the gas based on Index, no fixed price.
John

DEBRA PERLINGIERE@ECT
12/21/2000 10:48 AM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Shanner

I have sent a Gas Purchase Agreement as requested to Jim Shanner for
signature.  Are there any transactions which need to be confirmed under the
new agreement??

Mr. Shanner is curious as to price etc.  Could you contact him regarding this
issue and let me know.

Thanks!
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


FYI, I've faxed PG&E's filing to Rick Shapiro.  If others don't have it and
want it, let me know and I'll fax it.  The filing's brief--about 10
pages--with more detail apparently to be filed.  It lists the top 20
creditors.  The only ENE listing in the filing is ENE Canada at $28M.

The other thing that Governor and his PUC could have done many months ago was
realign rates to more accurately reflect the real cost of power.  That
arguably was a key determinant driving PG&E to Bankruptcy.

Jeff

	Eric Thode
	04/06/2001 01:37 PM

		 To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Vance
Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth
Ivers/NA/Enron@Enron, Rick Buy/Enron@EnronXGate, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Response Statement to PG&E's Ch. 11 Filing

I have returned a call to Gary Gentile from the AP.  I gave him this
statement and refused further comments on other issues, which included 1)
"what is Enron's actual exposure?", 2) "what was Enron's opinion of Gov.
Davis' speech last night?", and 3) "was this PG&E's only option?"  I did
respond to one follow-up question, which was "what options were available
months ago?"  My answer included the following 1) demand side solutions, 2)
allowing long-term contracting for power supplies, and 3) expediting the
siting process for new supplies.

Eric

Karen Denne
04/06/2001 01:17 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Vance
Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula
Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Ivers/NA/Enron@Enron, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT,
Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Tribolet/Corp/Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Response Statement to PG&E's Ch. 11 Filing

It's unfortunate that the state's largest utility was forced to turn to the
courts for a resolution.  Solutions to the state's energy crisis have been
available for months that would have avoided this scenario, but Gov. Davis
and the Legislature lacked the bold leadership to take swift, decisive
action.

Enron's exposure to PG&E will not have any material effect on earnings or on
our financial condition.

If pressed:  Any further comment would be speculative, as we have not yet
seen the filing.


* IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED - Do Not Delete *
Executive Impact & Influence Program

Dear Mark Haedicke,

As part of the Executive Impact and Influence Program,
each participant is asked to gather input on the
participant's own management styles and practices as
experienced by their immediate manager, each direct
report, and up to eight colleagues/peers.

You have been requested to provide feedback for a
participant attending the next program.  Your input
(i.e., a Self assessment, if you are a participant in
this program, Manager assessment, Direct Report
assessment, or Colleague/Peer assessment) will be
combined with the input of others and used by the
program participant to develop an action plan to
improve his/her management styles and practices.  If
you are providing feedback as a Manager of the
participant, please note that your feedback will be
identified in the summary report.

It is important that you complete this assessment NO
LATER THAN CLOSE OF BUSINESS on Tuesday, May 1, 2001.

To begin the online administration process, you will
need the following Internet address and Password(s).
NOTE:  If you are providing feedback for more than one
person, each password and participant name is
individually listed below.

Open your Internet browser e.g., Internet Explorer or
Netscape Navigator, and please type or copy the URL
address below into your Internet browser (please DO NOT
go through Lotus Notes):

www.fsddatasvc.com/enron

7E73TB    (Daniel R. Rogers)

If you experience technical problems, please call
Dennis Ward at FSD Data Services, 713-942-8436.  If you
have any questions about this process, you may contact
Debbie Nowak at Enron, 713-853-3304, or Christi Smith at
Leadership Research Institute/Keilty, Goldsmith & Company,
619-216-0404.

Thank you for your participation.


Please find attached the 2000 Peaker cost summary for the week ending
3/24/00.  If you have any questions, please give me a call.  Thanks Amy 3-7805


Richard--Joe has some ideas about this and will get back with you (and submit
the RCR).

"Tabors, Richard" <tabors@tca-us.com> on 07/18/2000 06:05:36 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay <Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>, James D Steffes
<James.D.Steffes@enron.com>
cc: "Tabors, Richard" <tabors@tca-us.com>, Joe Hartsoe
<Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Richard Shapiro <Richard.Shapiro@enron.com>, Steven
J Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Rob Bradley <Rob.Bradley@enron.com>
Subject: RE: Dan Larcamp request

Christi, Jim, et al

This last exchange has been very helpful.  The question that we need some
guidance on is how detailed he wants these answers and what he will do with
the results.  There are at least two levels that we could look at
effectively.

 1.  Fairly quickly, a repeat of the analysis done in the summer of
'98 when we looked at the price spikes in the midwest.  It would need to
focus on San Diego since that seems to be where the price problem is today
(along with the midwest) and also get a glimmer on (rumor picked up here)
the impact of CA price spikes on Oregon consumers.  The conclusion from '98
was that price spikes are necessary to send investment price signals for
both generation additions and for DSM investments (load response).
Presumably this would carry forward to a 2000 study.

 2.  A more careful look at the same areas described above but more
focused on how the wholesale prices find their way to end use consumers.  WE
covered this only in a cursory fashion in '98.  Here we would need to do two
things.  The first is make certain that Dan and the FERC senior folks
understand the basics that the price spikes in the midwest and in the other
bilateral markets only affect the incremental transactions (the lesson of
'98)not all kWh.  This is different from price spikes in the "pool markets"
where they set the price for all kWh.  The second point is to see that there
is an understanding of the role of a forward market and a hedge, i.e. that
you could "look on EOL" and buy forward a 7x24 for the summer, say, and pay
a market price to protect you against the volatility on an hourly basis by
absorbing it in a 3 month contract. The "price signal for investment"
conclusion would carry forward as above.

What do you think the level of interest / need is and how quickly does he
need some or all of the answers?

This is a good time for TCA to tackle this.  We have (or had) a quiet moment
for both Fagan and Rao who are the two experts on data development and
analysis from published sources.

Christi, let's talk in the morning so I can scope an RCR.

Thank you.

Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: Christi L Nicolay [mailto:Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 5:17 PM
To: James D Steffes
Cc: tabors@tca-us.com; Joe Hartsoe; Richard Shapiro; Steven J Kean; Rob
Bradley
Subject: Re: Dan Larcamp request

Thanks, Jim--Dan Larcamp seemed to genuinely want to learn what the problems
are
and to educate his staff.  In that regard, we have offered to have some of
his
staff down to use some of Enron's tools.  He was specifically asking for the
data below to counter the bent at FERC for price caps.  I didn't get a
feeling
that he would use the data to say that everything is fine.  In fact, we took
him
through some parking examples and he asked that we hold a "seminar" type
activity for some of his senior staffers.  He is in the process of bringing
on
some staffers that can act agressively on hotline issues, etc.  He was very
familiar with the other problems on the grid.

He also asked Kevin why Enron doesn't want LMP everywhere because with our
staffing we can run over everyone else.  Kevin told him that then there is
no
market liquidity and we can't trade with ourselves.  As it is now, there are
less than 10 big players due to the transmission risk.  We explained in
detail
what happens in the "Into" Markets and why it is so difficult to deal with
transmission/physical risk.  Kevin said that even the big bank players, like
Morgan Stanley, usually flip the product before it goes to liquidation so
they
do not have to take transmission risk.  Dan L., having come from gas,
understood
the liquidity issues and had a good discussion with Kevin.  (He sat down in
Kevin's chair and looked at pricing on EOL.)

Overall, it was a very positive meeting.  Kevin was impressed that Dan L.
really
understood the issues and acted like he wanted to do something, but needed
help
in educating his people.

James D Steffes@EES
07/18/2000 04:00 PM

To:   Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   tabors@tca-us.com@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT, Richard
      Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Rob
      Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject:  Re: Dan Larcamp request  (Document link: Christi L Nicolay)

Christi, etal --

I don't disagree with this analysis, but the drive for competitive
generation is
not simply related to the short term benefits (one year total energy bill
versus
next year total energy bill).  Competitive generation is also about risk
transfer - regulated monopolies assign all new plant risk to customers,
merchant
generation assigns all new plant risk to shareholders.

In addition, I hope that Larcamp won't take our data / analysis and try to
argue
that "everything is fine".  Clearly there are many undone / misdone public
policy problems (e.g., native load exception, hourly transmission, etc.)
left in
the wholesale energy markets.

Jim

To:   tabors@tca-us.com
cc:   Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
      Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:  Dan Larcamp request

Richard T. -- Dan Larcamp of FERC was here today and asked for a
comprehensive,
real price study using data from last summer or the last two summers showing
how
much on a $kw basis that retail customers were affected by the price spikes
(including how much they saved as a result of hopefully lower prices for the
remainder of the year.)  He needs this to fight price caps.  How much would
something like that cost (probably using some of the data you gathered last
year.)?  How long would it take to create?  Thanks for your help.


has anyone notified EOL of our flip-out choice.  I think the product would
work like this:

Chic - Peoples      June one day withdrawal / July ratable
injection                      .015 bid     .025 offer
Chic - Peoples      June balance of month withdrawal / July ratable
injection    .015 bid     .025 offer

I think the rest of month would be more popular but we should give both a
try.  Also we need to work on an auto hedge feature for the Chicago office.

call me


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/31/2000
04:08 PM ---------------------------

Tanuja Tulsiani <ttulsi@IIRLTD.CO.UK> on 03/30/2000 04:39:22 AM
To: Ttulsi@IIRLTD.CO.UK
cc:
Subject: Energy in Europe Congress 2000

 Dear Energy in Europe Congress Delegate

ENERGY IN EUROPE CONGRESS 2000
19th June * 22th June 2000 * Kempinski Hotel , Berlin

I am delighted that you will be joining us to speak at our Energy in
Europe2000 conference (formally known as Electricity in Europe Congress) and
enclose copies of the printed brochure for you and your colleagues. I hope
that you will agree that the programme looks excellent and the response so
far indicates that the event will be extremely well attended.

I would be grateful if you could just take a moment to look through the items
we would like from you prior to the conference to help ensure everything runs
smoothly on the day.

Your Administration/Preparation Details
12 weeks to go!

You will find attached:
  ? PINK FORM : please tick and fill in and fax back immediately
? HOTEL FORM: please tick and fill in and fax direct to the hotel
? MARKETING.DOC: Information for out marketing department, please fill in and
send back as soon as possible

Friday 26th May 2000 : A Hard Copy Of Your Documentation
3 weeks to go!

  ? We would like a hard black & white copy of  your presentation / bullet
points/copy of slides whichever is best for you, to insert into the delegate
documentation. We can receive this by post or email if the documents are not
too complex but we try not to insert fax copies as copy quality is poor.
(e-mail address - ttulsi@icbi.co.uk).

N.B. Even if you plan to speak off the cuff, we would urge that you submit at
least an outline of your speech to us for insertion into the delegate pack by
the above date. The most consistent complaint that we have from delegates is
that not all speakers offer hard copies of their presentation.

  ? If you are unable to make this deadline, please could you inform us as
soon as possible so that we can make alternative arrangements and avoid
printing delay.

Under separate cover we have arranged for five brochures to be sent to you
outlining the full programme.  These should arrive very shortly.

Should you have any queries regarding your participation at the conference
please contact Tanuja Tulsiani, our Logistics  Manager who will be looking
after the 'domestic' side of the event. You can call her direct on (44) 171
915 5173 or do contact myself. Thank you once again for joining us and I look
forward to seeing you in the Berlin.

With kind regards,

Alexandra Howells
Director
Energy in Europe Congress 2000

 - hotel form.doc
 - Pink form.doc
 - marketing.doc


I never would have guessed smoked oysters.  I think I'm cooking for the 4 of
us, plus Lena and any stray friends we find.  We will probably come to
Palacios on Saturday and spend the night, although I haven't discussed it
with Mom yet.

It is dreary here today, but in a nice way.  I don't mind it too much,
although by Sunday we may be stir crazy.

We went to Michael's school on Wednesday, as his class was singing in
chapel.  Roger Clements was there, video cam in hand, doing the dad thing.
He is a really big guy, much bigger than I thought.  He looks like a football
player.  I see why Piazza didn't take a swing!

I would say "break a leg" for Katie, but with your groups orthopedic
problems, I hesitate to use the phrase!

Love,

Kay


Rohm & Haas has been added and the sale for Union Carbide for April has been
added.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/06/2001 12:01 PM -----

 - Yahoo - Pacific Gas and Electric Company Files for Chapter 11
Reorganization.htm


Group,
When doing a buy-resale with Pacificorp, we need to agree on the buy and the
resale prices on the phone.  These prices need to be recorded in your trade
log.  We also need to now check the prices nightly on buy-resales with
Pacificorp when doing the SAR.  We are having numerous discrepancies with
Pacificorp because of problems with buy-resale deal entry.  I have listened
to several tapes where only the spread ($10 or $20 dollars) is mentioned.
Let's be sure to  establish these prices, do the confirms nightly, and make
sure we can continue to work closely with this counterparty.

On a separate note...please be sure to use two tags on any buy-resales.

Thanks.

Bill


Can you forward me both?  I'll take a look at them. Maybe they'll do the trick.  Also, do you have that press article where we partnered with a muni (in Canada, I think)?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scheuer, Janelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 4:49 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Meeting w/Marcie Edwards, Anaheim General Manager

Hi Jeff...I have an intro letter, and the presentation that we typically give on our first visit.  Do you think one of those might be appropriate, or shall I put together something in between the two?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:51 PM
To:	Scheuer, Janelle
Subject:	Meeting w/Marcie Edwards, Anaheim General Manager

Greetings:
I just talked to Marcie.  She's interested, but wants some more info to examine before setting up a meeting.  Aren't there some press articles about the sort of muni partnerships you want to pursue with SMUD and Anaheim?  Do we have anything else that I can email to her to wet her whistle for the meeting?  Will get back to you very soon about meeting with Schori at SMUD.

Best,
Jeff


_________________________________________________________________

            B R E A K F A S T   W I T H   T H E   F O O L
                      Monday, December 4, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=225164
_________________________________________________________________

 Sponsored By: InvestorPlace.com
 A billion Chinese are clamoring to get on the Internet. When
 the floodgates open, 3 stocks will skyrocket. Find out their
 names in a JUST-RELEASED FREE REPORT from #1 stock picker:
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=225165

"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." --
Oscar Wilde

PEPSI FINALLY WINS QUAKER
PepsiCo will wed Quaker for $13.4 billion in stock.

By Tom Jacobs

Ending weeks of maneuvering and speculation, PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP)
has agreed to buy Quaker Oats (NYSE: OAT) for $13.4 billion in
stock. Pepsi matched its deal of one month ago of 2.3 shares per
Quaker share, valuing Quaker at $97.46 per share, based on
Pepsi's Friday close at $42.38. Quaker ended Friday at $88.63.

The deal follows weeks of machinations that began with a
rejected Pepsi bid for Quaker, followed by interest from
Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) and France's Groupe Danone (NYSE: DA) --
reportedly at a price more than $14 billion. With the departure
of Coke and Groupe Danone from negotiations, attention returned
to Pepsi,whose original lower offer now looked darn good to
almost-left-at-the-altar Quaker.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=225166
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=225167

The pact creates a food and beverage powerhouse with $25 billion
in revenues and an expected $80 billion market cap. The deal
gives Pepsi three key advantages: 1) Pepsi swigs Quaker Oats'
Gatorade sports drink, which is tops in its market and carries a
huge distribution and warehouse system that Pepsi hopes will
increase efficiency and reach for its Tropicana brand; 2)
Quaker's fruit, oatmeal, and granola bar and other snack
products will spice Pepsi's Frito-Lay and other snack foods; 3)
highly profitable Quaker brands such as Quaker Oatmeal, Life and
Cap'n Crunch Cereals, Rice-A-Roni ("the San Francisco treat!"),
and Aunt Jemima syrup provide hefty free cash flow.

Pepsi's CEO and Chairman Robert Enrico had planned to retire,
and will now speed up his move. Current President Steve
Reinemund will become CEO, and Enrico will remain on the board
as vice chairman. Quaker's CEO Robert Morrison, credited with
Quaker's turnaround, committed to stay on for 18 months and will
join Enrico on the board as a vice chairman. Indra Nooyi,
Pepsi's CFO, becomes president, increasing the ranks of
big-company top-level women executives.

The fianc,s agreed to two price conditions: If Pepsi stock drops
under $40 for 10 days in the month before closing, valuing
Quaker at $92 a share, Quaker may walk unless Pepsi commits to
$92 a share. On the flip side, Pepsi pays no more than $105 a
share, even if its stock climbs over $45.65 a share. Pepsi will
issue 315 million shares to pay for the purchase, which the
parties expect to be completed in the first half of 2001 --
depending on antitrust scrutiny.
_________________________________________________________________

NEWS TO GO

Bloomberg reports the network storage giant EMC (NYSE: EMC) will
introduce a product, code-named Chameleon, to compete against
Network Appliance (Nasdaq: NTAP) in the small to medium-size
business market for network attached storage (NAS). EMC already
competes in the market for large corporation NAS, and holds 30%
of the overall NAS market compared to Network Appliance's 40%,
according to information technology market researcher IDC. IDC
estimates that the NAS market will reach $7 billion by 2003. EMC
closed Friday at $78.25, off a 52-week high of $103.94, while
Network Appliance finished at $53.94, from a 52-week top of
$152.75.

Barron's reported in its December 4 edition that eBay (Nasdaq:
EBAY) was in talks to buy uBid, a unit of CMGI (Nasdaq: CMGI).
Reuters reported that an eBay source denied the story, though
eBay declined official comment. According to Barron's, UBid
plans to pop the champagne this week on a new
consumer-to-consumer auction site, Auction Exchange, to compete
with eBay. UBid has 1.5 million registered users, and its
current online auction site sells mostly refurbished and
closed-out consumer electronics.

Bad news keeps copying at Xerox (NYSE: XRX). After Moody
downgraded Xerox debt to junk-bond status on Friday, the company
announced it would lay off 200 production workers -- the first
time in more than a year that the company has fired union
workers. The laid-off employees must work until December 22 but
will receive pay and benefits through January 26. This action
follows November's decision to pink-slip 350 white-collar U.S.
workers, and both are separate from last March's decision to lay
off 5,200 workers by April 2001. Xerox shares closed Friday at
$6.25, down 56.3 cents, or 8%.

Swiss drug giant Novartis (NYSE: NVS) announced positive Phase
II results from its developmental leukemia drug, Glivec.
Leukemia involves uncontrolled proliferation of white blood
cells. Glivec selectively targets a key protein involved in
leukemia, and Novartis hopes the drug will be used instead of
painful bone marrow transplants or more toxic alpha interferon
treatment. Significant response rates varied according to the
disease stage, and ranged from 33% to 78%, with 30% showing
normal blood counts. Glivec is still several years from the
pharmacy shelves because it faces larger Phase III studies and
application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for
marketing approval.
_________________________________________________________________

EDITORS' PICK

Todd Lebor provides investors a list of sources for information
on the wireless industry, along with his assessment of each
one's credibility.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=225168
_______________________________________________________________

-News & Commentary
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=225169

-Fool Community
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=225170

-Post of the Day
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=225171

-Latest Fribble
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=225172

-Latest Market Numbers
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=225173
____________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=225174
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=225175
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=225176
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=225177
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=225178

 Sponsored By: InvestorPlace.com
 A billion Chinese are clamoring to get on the Internet. When
 the floodgates open, 3 stocks will skyrocket. Find out their
 names in a JUST-RELEASED FREE REPORT from #1 stock picker:
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=225179

17 STOCK IDEAS, ONE REPORT
 Don't miss our best-selling research product, Industry
 Focus 2001. Available in electronic download or hard copy.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=225180

ATTENTION, BIOTECH INVESTORS: NEW INVESTING GUIDE
  Learn to analyze the potential of biotech companies
  with our new biotech investing guide.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=225181

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com>

Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=225182
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

.

MsgId:
msg-3033-2000-12-04_9-21-37-3369786_2_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-09:26:27(12-04-
2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


just a note to let you know my new email address, i will be doing away with my webtv and have decided to get with the rest of the world with this technology thing.
later.
ed


I need you to sell my truck and campers.  You get 10% commission plus expenses.  I need money now more than ever.


Attached are the Net Open Position and Maturity Gap Risk violations for Enron Americas GasTrading for August 21, 2001.


Please respond to Ken Smith
California State Treasurer Phil Angelides held a press  conference this afternoon to announce that $3.5 billion in interim financing has  been arranged through J.P. Morgan and Lehman Brothers, and that an additional $1  billion in financing is expected to be completed next week from an undisclosed  source.

The financing is in conjunction with an executive order issued  yesterday by the governor that allows bond sales for energy purchased by  the Department of Water Resources.  Previously, Gov. Davis and Treasurer  Angelides had sought legislative approval of the bond issuance, but were not  successful.  Further review by state attorneys determined that the governor  could authorize the issuance of bonds by executive order with the difference  that the bonds can only be used for energy purchases going forward and cannot be  used to backfill past general fund expenditures.

A one-page handout summarizing the financing has been  sent to Houston.  The vital statistics are:
The authorized loan amount is $5 billion, with an initial  $3.5 billion committed;
The rate is 4.75%, but will jump to 7% if the bonds are not  issued successfully by October 31, which is the scheduled maturity date of the  loan (Angelides emphasized that this is not the due  date).

The goal of the financing is to stem the flow of funds from  the general fund for power purchases and avert a cash crisis.  The  financing, which also provides working capital for continued state energy  purchases, is secured by revenues from electricity sales and will be repaid  by the bonds.

Angelides noted that the financing, which he hopes to have  totally closed by July 1, precludes generators from walking away from contracts  under the clause that requires financing by a certain date.  He said it  satifsies "most" DWR contracts and precludes arguments made by generators  for a "credit premium."

Angelides also said that the financing is important because it  "builds momentum" for the huge revenue bond sale and that it "sends a powerful  signal to Wall Street that the bond issue is real."

According to his figures, the general fund is currently out  about $5.2 billion net ($6.1 billion in purchases minus $900 million in  revenues) in power purchases through June 12.

Steps still must occur before the bonds can be issued, he  said.  The PUC has to adopt rate agreements, adopt a servicing order with  the utilities to collect revenues to repay the bonds, and has to enact rate  increases of about 3 cents/kwh in SDG&E's territory.  Angelides noted  that the lenders have made their financial commitment event though these PUC  actions are still outstanding.

The bonds will not be issued until early September.   Angelides said late August is a terrible time because the financial community is  on a pre-Labor Day holiday and that the state would hold off until the more  favorable period following the holiday.

Earlier in the afternoon, the Foundation for Taxpayer and  Consumer Rights -- Harvey Rosenfield's group -- held a press conference to voice  opposition to the Edison MOU.  They all seem to agree that the MOU is  likely dead, but are afraid of it arising at a later date in some form.

When asked about the business community being asked to  shoulder the costs of utilities' debt, Rosenfield said that a problem has arisen  in that business wants direct access but DWR has already purchased the power  they "don't want."  He believes Edison alone should be responsible for its  debt; it's government's role to go forward, he said, and Edison's job to "clean  up its mess."

Rosenfield cautioned that if legislators "make the mistake of  paying one more penny" towards a bailout there will be a referendum on the  bailout and the legislators voting for it.  He said they would be  held personally accountable.

(Exactly what he means by this is unclear.  In  California, a "referendum" -- which is the word he used -- is a little-used tool  to overturn legislation that has been passed and signed.  Whether he was  threatening recall attempts is also unclear.)

Rosenfield added that depending on how things progress, there  could be an initiative and it could include a public power  component.

The press release issued at the press conference, which also  featured Harry Snyder of Consumers Union, has been forwarded to Houston.   It is also available through this link: http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/utilities/pr/pr001706.php3


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<TITLE>Fantasy Football 2001 - CBS.SportsLine.com</TITLE>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="" name=description>
<META content="" name=keywords>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>

    <SPACER height="1" width="1"
  type="block">

          Someone will win a millions dollars!

Do you know football?  Would you pay $5 to enter an office pool with a $1 Million grand prize?  There are 3 weeks left in the pro football season and someone is GUARANTEED to win $1 Million in the Office Pool Challenge.  There's still plenty of time left for you to win, so sign up today!

If someone picks every game right in a week, that person is entered into a random drawing with everyone else who made "perfect picks" during the season.  If no one makes "perfect picks" then the 17 weekly high-scorers are entered into a drawing for the $1 Million prize.  With 3 weeks left, you still have 3 chances to make perfect picks or to be one of the weekly high scorers... maybe you'll win all weeks!

Someone is guaranteed to win $1 Million...why can't it be you? SIGN UP TODAY!

·	Grand Prize: $1,000,000

·	First Place: $5,000

·	Second Place: $2,500

·	Third Place: $1,000

·	Fourth - Sixth Place: $500

·	Weekly Prize: $2,500 worth of electronics

 ?
?
?
?
?          ?<MAP name=map>?<AREA coords=67,15,150,77 href="http://poolchallenge.fantasy.sportsline.com/?r=esfb1228_html" shape=RECT>?</MAP>?

	?
?
?     ?
?
?
?          ?

This message has been provided free of charge and free of obligation. If you prefer not to receive emails of this nature please respond to remove@commissioner.com. Do not respond to this email directly. ??

?
?
?
?     	?    	?
?
?    <SPACER height="1" width="1" ?  type="block">

?


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001 04:06 PM ---------------------------

"Amir Cyrus Ahanchian" <acahanchian@zdnetonebox.com> on 03/02/2001 10:43:08 PM
To:	eric.bass@enron.com, reeder@mail.utexas.edu, bird3397@yahoo.com, dandelionwine1@hotmail.com, dganc@yahoo.com, tyrell.harrison@enron.com, brian.hoskins@enron.com, jefflerner@aol.com, btmazumdar@zdnetonebox.com, moranito@hotmail.com, nghiatn@hotmail.com, Suresh_vasan@enron.net, jwiseman@newregency.com
cc:
Subject:	BE CAREFUL IF AT WORK!! Guaranteed, the best email ever!

--
Amir Cyrus Ahanchian
acahanchian@zdnetonebox.com - email
(512) 682-6996 ext. 1087 - voicemail/fax

___________________________________________________________________
To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com

Return-Path: <jpcary96@hotmail.com>
Received: from hotmail.com ([216.32.180.196]) by mta08.onebox.com          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP          id <20010301232248.EMWB29651.mta08.onebox.com@hotmail.com>          for <acahanchian@zdnetonebox.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:22:48 -0800
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;	 Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:22:46 -0800
Received: from 204.27.156.147 by lw2fd.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;	Thu, 01 Mar 2001 23:22:42 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [204.27.156.147]
From: "Patrick Cary" <jpcary96@hotmail.com>
To: acahanchian@zdnetonebox.com, bwfox_us@yahoo.com, rowdy_1999@hotmail.com, orenmax@hotmail.com, jared_haun@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: CAREFUL IF AT WORK!! best email ever!
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 17:22:42 -0600
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_1c12_5b32_765b"
Message-ID: <LAW2-F272VhEUsebmsp0000c2d0@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Mar 2001 23:22:46.0106 (UTC) FILETIME=[85E593A0:01C0A2A6]

What's up guys?  Sorry for this mass e-mail, but you have got to see this
... be careful if you are viewing this at work or anywhere public.  I know
there are a few of you I haven't been in touch with for a while, but please
forgive me as I've been tied up in a shithole in Paducah, KY.  I hope all is
well with you.  Enjoy this e-mail.  BTW - Jared, this is a REAL forward ...
send me more of this stuff instead of the other crap that comes my way!
Adios,
Patrick

If only I knew who these girls were!

----Original Message Follows----
From: "alan armstrong" <astronga@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: KappaKappaDelta@yahoogroups.com
To: kappakappadelta@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [KappaKappaDelta] best email ever
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 23:07:50

 >
 >
 >
 >>
 >>Note: forwarded message attached.
 >>
 >>
 >>__________________________________________________
 >>Do You Yahoo!?
 >>Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
 >>a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

X-Apparently-To: samueljking_2000@yahoo.com via web9007
X-Track: 1: 40
Received: from sm5.texas.rr.com (24.93.35.219)  by mta310.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2001 23:37:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from s5b6e2 (cs162118-22.austin.rr.com [24.162.118.22])	by sm5.texas.rr.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with SMTP id f1H7Y5e24149	for <samueljking_2000@yahoo.com>; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 01:34:05 -0600
Message-ID: <001201c098b5$16c0a3c0$6501a8c0@austin.rr.com>
From: "Brian Starnes" <starnes@austin.rr.com>
To: "Sam King" <samueljking_2000@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fw: game on
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 01:40:09 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01C09882.8FC69320"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Content-Length: 863920

strippers r fun

----- Original Message -----
From: brian.starnes@amd.com
To: starnes@austin.rr.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 11:47 AM
Subject: FW: game on

-----Original Message-----
From: TEA Lee, Lloyd [mailto:llee@aus.telusa.com ]
Sent:  Tuesday, February 13, 2001 11:15 AM
To: Starnes, Brian; Cary Yarosh;  Chris Schild; Darwin; David; Eric Bergold; Robinson, Jeffrey; Jesse; John White;  Mark Helton; Matt; Michael Arn; Michael Gunterman; Michael Pham; Todd  work
Subject: game on

best just forward this one to the  crib....
<<game1.jpg>> <<game2.jpg>> <<game3.jpg>> <<game4.jpg>> <<game5.jpg>> <<game6.jpg>> <<game7.jpg>> <<game8.jpg>> <<game9.jpg>> <<ggame10.jpg>> <<ggame11.jpg>>

 - game1.jpg
 - game2.jpg
 - game3.jpg
 - game4.jpg
 - game5.jpg
 - game6.jpg
 - game7.jpg
 - game8.jpg
 - game9.jpg
 - ggame10.jpg
 - ggame11.jpg


please respond.  MHC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Roman, Lilia
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 2:37 PM
To:	Melman, Gil M.; Howard, Kevin A.; Redmond, Brian; Cash, Michelle; Gray, Barbara N.
Cc:	Parnizari, Lori; Bachand, Terri; Carroll, Lillian; Farrell, Keegan
Subject:	Hanover Measurement Services

Please let me know your availability for Tuesday, September 18th, so that a meeting regarding Hanover Measurement Services can be scheduled.  The meeting should be no longer than an hour.  The attendees would be:

Patrick Hickey
Gil Melman
Kevin Howard
Brian Redmond
Michelle Cash
Barbara Gray

Thank you,
Lilia Roman


1. Attached is the first draft of the TCPL settlement (prepared by TCPL).  It
reads pretty much as I summarized in my previous email except TCPL has
written in a few extra million of incentives for themselves.

2. Assuming that TCPL wins a cost of capital rate case of 12.5% ROE and 35%
equity structure (from 9.61% & 30%) the final toll could be $1.22 annualized
(plus an upward rest of year adjustment to recover the lower interim tolls in
effect since Jan 1).

3. The stakeholders will be reviewing it tomorrow at 2 pm. and discussing
with TCPL 8:30 Wednesday AM.

4 . What will Enron Canada's position be assuming there is wide stakeholder
acceptance?  Will we sign this agreeement?  Will we not sign but give
assurances we will not litigate non-cost of capital issues.  Lets discuss
before Wednesday.

Kevin

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Heal/CAL/ECT on 02/12/2001 04:05 PM
---------------------------

"Rob Whitmore" <rob_whitmore@transcanada.com> on 02/12/2001 03:32:23 PM
To: Marg Seeger <marg_seeger@transcanada.com>
cc: John Guerriero <jguerriero@duke-energy.com>, Debbie Harris
<debbie_harris@transcanada.com>, Phi Dang <PDang@gazoductqm.com>, Adam White
<adam_white@transalta.com>, Albert Stortchak <stortcal@est.gov.on.ca>, Bill
Wible <bill_wible@iroquois.com>, Bob Fraser <bobfraser@aec.ca>, Brian Howell
<behowell@interlog.com>, Brian Ridley <bridley@hydro.mb.ca>, Brian Troicuk
<troicuk@capp.ca>, Brian White <bswhite@ceg.com>, Brian Woods
<brian_woods@email.mobil.com>, Cheryl Worthy <worthycg@bp.com>, Chuck
Baumgart <cbaumgart@renaissance.ca>, Debbie White
<debbwhit@marathoncanada.com>, Diane Cameron <diane_cameron@nexeninc.com>,
Doug Holgate <doug.holgate@husky-oil.com>, Frank Brennan
<frank.brennan@cgc.enbridge.com>, Gilles Favreau
<favreau.gilles@hydro.qc.ca>, Ken Hadley <ken_hadley@pcp.ca>, Kevin Heal
<kevin.heal@enron.com>, Kurt McKnight <kmcknight@uniongas.com>, Lisa McMahon
<lisa.mcmahon@neg.pge.com>, Lyne Mercier <lmercier@gazmet.com>, Martin
Imbleau <mimbleau@gazmet.com>, mike verwegen <mverwegen@uniongas.com>, Mike
Stedman <mstedman@uniongas.com>, Murray Samuel
<murray_samuel@transcanada.com>, Robert Agnello <ragnello@edisonmission.com>,
Robert Andrews <randrews@coral-energy.com>, Peter Fournier <igua@magma.ca>,
Ron Moore <ronald.moore@esso.com>, Ronald Richard
<ronald.richard@mrn.gouv.qc.ca>, Shonda Day <days@epenergy.com>, Suzanne
Boucher-Chen <suzanne.boucher-chen@southernenergy.com>, Vern Gorr
<vgorr@saskenergy.sk.ca>, Frederic Morel <fmorel@gazmet.com>, Isabelle Quach
<iquach@gazmet.com>, Robert Rowe <rob.rowe@cgc.enbridge.com>, Richard King
<rking@powerbudd.com>, Dan Collins <dacollins@negm.com>, Mike Lucy
<mslucy@negm.com>, Nick Schultz <schultz@capp.ca>, Howard Stephens
<hstephens@hydro.mb.ca>, Brent Moen <bmoen@hydro.mb.ca>, Jeremy Slasor
<jeremy.slasor@demloak.com>, Jim Fisher <jfisher@duke-energy.com>, Janet
Holder <janet.holder@cgc.enbridge.com>, Rob Hemstock <rhemsto@ect.enron.com>,
Aleck Dadson <adadson@ect.enron.com>, Normand Stevenson
<nstevenson@gazmet.com>, Randy Fryer <rfryer@northlandpower.com>, Alan Reid
<alan_reid@pcp.ca>, John MacPherson <macpher@petro-canada.ca>, Alain Lefebvre
<alain.lefebvre@mrn.gouv.qc.ca>, craigl <craigl@cnrl.com>, swong
<swong@northlandpower.com>, rinde_powell <rinde_powell@pcp.ca>, "ed.bruton"
<ed.bruton@neg.pge.com>, lnixon <lnixon@tmvgas.com>, "jill.page"
<jill.page@gov.ab.ca>, Max Feldman <max_feldman@transcanada.com>,
"bernard.kramer" <bernard.kramer@mcnenergy.com>, bartlon
<bartlon@epenergy.com>, sharon johnson <sharonej@telusplanet.net>, Jack Hawks
<jack.hawks@neg.pge.com>, Tomasz Lange <tomasz.lange@southernenergy.com>,
Frank Basham <fbasham@talisman-energy.com>, John Lee
<john_lee@transcanada.com>, Steve Emond <steve_emond@transcanada.com>, peter
milne <pjmilne@telusplanet.net>, Jim Bartlett <jim_bartlett@transcanada.com>,
Wendy Hanrahan <wendy_hanrahan@transcanada.com>
Subject: Service and Pricing Settlement Principles

Attached is the Statement of Principles under TransCanada,s Service and
Pricing Settlement for 2001 and 2002.    The document outlines
principles of the settlement that were established as of Friday February
9 2001.

Three supporting documents have been included to assist with further
discussion.  Document 1 provides information on the Merger Costs and
Benefits Agreement and the provision to amortize severance costs over 3
years.  Document 2 provides a calculation of TransCanada,s incentive
revenue based on the proposed sharing percentages.  These percentages
were raised in the proposed mechanism to compensate for the introduction
of AOS service.  Document 3 reviews the calculation of marginal fuel,
used to calculate the IT price floor.

A phone conference meeting will be held in room 2902 of the TransCanada
East Tower commencing at 8:30 AM M.S.T.  Long distance participants
should call 1-888-832-0082. Local participants should call 216-0900. The
Chairperson's code is 2127#, and the Participant's code is 4108#.

The meeting agenda is as follows:

1. Stakeholder Comments on Statement of Principles

2. Next Steps

TransCanada reserves the right to withdraw the Statement of Principles
in the event that it receives insufficient support.

If you require any assistance, please call Rob Whitmore at (403)
267-6181.

 - Statement of Principles_ML2.doc
 - Document1.doc
 - Document 2.doc
 - Document 3.doc


Today's the 7th anniversary of the release of the California Commission's now
infamous "Blue Book" that launched Direct Access.  Would it be bad taste for
Skilling to note the anniversary on the call with Bryson?

Viva Choice....

Best,
Jeff


Attached is a blacklined Agreement from CSFB which mirrors the Agreement they
executed with Enron Credit Limited.  Anita has added Enron Credit Limited as
a Specified Entity and added definition for Specified Indebtedness.  She has
deleted the following, which have not been replaced with anything else:

Contractual Currency
Quarterly Unaudited Financial Statements for CSFB
legal opinion for CSFB
Jurisdiction/Arbitration
Procedures for Entering into Transactions
Transfer
Severability
Additional Terms for FX Transactions and Currency Option Transactions

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001
09:41 AM ---------------------------

"Khosla, Anita" <anita.khosla@csfb.com> on 02/27/2001 05:02:17 PM
To: "'stephanie.panus@enron.com'" <stephanie.panus@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: ISDA Master Agreement between Credit Suisse First Boston Internat
ional and Enron Corp.

Stephanie- Further to my recent email, please find attached a copy of the
Enron Corp. Schedule "marked-up" with our comments which replica the ISDA
CSFBi has recent executed with Enron Credit Limited. I will send you a copy
of the executed ISDA Agreement once I have received Enron Credit Limited's
approval.
In the interim, please let me know if you have any comments on the Schedule.
Kind regards
Anita

 <<056ctr(csfb-ene).doc>>

 - 056ctr(csfb-ene).doc


Tanya


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000 03:26
PM ---------------------------
From: Margaret Allen@ENRON on 09/27/2000 01:45 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Commercials

John, John, John....very impressive analysis!  The first two commercials were
supposed to be idealistic spots announcing Enron as an innovative company,
while the next four are proof points to our innovation by showing the
businesses we have created.

I know you were elated to get an email from me this morning, thus proving
that I had not been kidnapped and all those important things I work on would
continue to be completed.  Oh and that certainly is a pretty design you add
to your emails.  Very masculine!

Smile, Margaret

ps, i hope you can read my sarcasm over email -- if you knew me better, you
would understand it completely since it is rare that i'm in a totally serious
mood. hope you don't take offense!

	John Arnold@ECT
	09/27/2000 12:29 PM

		 To: Margaret Allen/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Commercials

I really liked the commercials about specifics (i.e.  weather, EOL,
bandwidth).  The metal man was definitely at a different philosophical level
than where my brain operates.  Still not quite sure what was going on there.
Ode was a bit too idealistic.   The campaign in general was very different
than previous.   But I guess you know that and that's the point.   Again, I
think the commercials that showed why we are the most innovative were very
impressive.  Just telling people we are innovative made less of an impact.

Sorry I ruined your run.  At least you weren't molested by the River Oaks car
thief.

From: Margaret Allen@ENRON on 09/27/2000 08:24 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Commercials

So, what did you think?!  Don't lie or stretch the truth either -- you won't
hurt my feelings, I promise.

By the way, by the time I arrived home it was completely dark so I went for a
three mile run this morning.  Not fun, but I'm definitely awake right now!
BUT, it's all your fault I couldn't go last night....he!he!

Trade well, MSA


fyi

Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct
713-303-2632 cell
stacey.bolton@enron.com <mailto:stacey.bolton@enron.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Bolton, Stacey
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 4:00 PM
To: Anne Marie McShea (E-mail); Ashley Houston; Brent Beerley (E-mail); Dale Bryk (E-mail); Favreau. Gilles (E-mail); Gary Zielanski; George Tung (E-mail); Hoatson, Tom; Ira Rubenstein (E-mail); Jane Hotchkiss Gordy (E-mail); Jason Gifford (E-mail); jean hopkins (E-mail); Jeff Schnur (E-mail); Jmartin (E-mail); Joe Roenbeck (E-mail); John Schneider (E-mail); judy sheldrew (E-mail); Leah Gibbons (E-mail); Liz Robinson (E-mail); Mel Jones (E-mail); Melissa Lavinson (E-mail); Meredith Wingate (E-mail); Michael Rucker (E-mail); nancy radar (E-mail); Nicole fabri (E-mail); Peter Meadows Adels (E-mail); Rich Sedano (E-mail); Rishe, Frank; Ryan Park (E-mail); Sally Mattison (E-mail); Scott Kushnick (E-mail); Scotth (E-mail); Sonny Murphy (E-mail); Steve Haas (E-mail); Susan Covino (E-mail); Tom Rawls (E-mail)
Cc: Bob Grace (E-mail)
Subject: PJM Mtg Recap

All -

Wanted to briefly recap yesterday's meeting at PJM.  Our stated coalition goal going in to the meeting was to ensure the recognition of certificates (or financial commodities representing the attributes of energy) and capability with system New England is developing.  While phase I will not meet either goal, PJM readily admits that there are adaptations that need to be made to the system that meet our goals for Phase II of the program.  To this end, a users' group was establish.  I've listed highlights of the meeting and next steps below.   The formation of this group is a VERY positive step in moving toward a system that will most effectively meet our goals.  Finally, I'm attaching a list of the meeting attendees.  Let me know if you have any questions.  I'm encouraged by these developments, and once again would like to thank all of you for your support and teamwork on this crucial issue to all of our companies/organizations.

Highlights of Meeting:

Regulatory update: Regulators all expressed interest in hearing from stakeholders on Phase II of PJM GATS system.  In particular, Linda Nowiki from NJ BPU noted that because of the considerable change of the Board composition since the adoption of the disclosure rules, the upcoming expansion to 5 Commissioners and a likely new Board President, and the RTO proceedings that they were particularly interested in stakeholder feedback for the GATS system.

Phase I: operational by end of year and will produce company labels comprised of an aggregation of the load purchased.  Phase I is based on a mathematical formula, and will aggregate all fuel sources by company (not product).  The limitations include: an inability to carve out dedicated resources (such as a specific hydro purchase from a company's system); the inability to get to the plant level detail (unit only); the inability to segment the company fuel and emissions label into products; the emissions data (taken from EGrid) being dated and not accommodating recent emissions reductions based on retrofits or installed control technologies; and the inability to distinguish whether the unit meets class I or class II RPS.  PJM plans to distribute the first set of labels to LSEs and regulators, but realizes the data on the labels (due to the inabilities) will not be useful.

Phase II: John Dadorian, project lead for GATS program, has toyed with several conceptual ideas for Phase II.  The goal is to have the system operational by March '03 -- in time for the label distribution period for both NJ and MD.  John wants Phase II to be web-based, with suppliers/generators/marketers having access to their data.   John had one scenario that he presented whereby PJM would track, by contract path, the fuel and emissions mix of suppliers.  After a specified time period, PJM would submit preliminary labels to suppliers.  Suppliers would then have a choice of modifying their label based on trading attributes.  PJM has not made any decisions about Phase II and is looking to members for comment.  to this end, they suggested forming a user's group.

Formation of a user's group to address Phase II Conceptual Design and Implementation:  Enron, PG&E NEG, Hydro Quebec, PSEG and New Power made up the 5 needed members to start the group.  The user's group is NOT limited to PJM members, and a sign up sheet was distributed.  This user's group will be announced at the next PJM meeting on November 12th.  The first meeting of our user's group will be held in Wilmington, DE on Thursday 11/15.  Details will be circulated.

 Comment Period:  Comments are due by October 19th to John Dadorian on Phase I.  Since these labels are basically not going to have any "purpose" because the data will be useless, I don't know if it's worth the effort to submit comments.  I think our focus should be on Phase II.  Please let me know your thoughts.

NEXT STEPS:
While it is VERY positive that we have formed a user's group to vet these issues, it's clear that we still have considerable work to do.  Denise Foster from PJM will be establishing a list serve for us to circulate ideas/issues/concerns prior to the meeting.  The meeting participants briefly discussed items for our first meeting, including:

Guidelines for scope of group
Identifying Timeline and Milestones (target completion date is March '02)
Matrix of State Requirements (to be done ahead of time)
Identifying Design issues
    Capability with New England/New York
    Accommodating financial transactions or certificates
Concerns
    Identifying "true fuel mix" v. residual average
    How many entities would participate in a certificate market
    Treatment of unsold certificates
    Whether to have the ability to trade financially through settlement and have it recognized by PJM's system
Questions:
    Size of spot market
    Size of bilaterals
    Size of each state's load in PJM (i.e. 60% PA load)
    The additional uses for fuel and emissions mix information besides compliance with RPS/Disclosure

Have a great weekend.

Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct
713-303-2632 cell
stacey.bolton@enron.com <mailto:stacey.bolton@enron.com>


It just keeps getting better....
----- Forwarded by Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 01:31 PM -----

	Greg Johnston
	10/20/2000 01:25 PM

		 To: Michael Miller/EWC/Enron@ENRON, John Howton/HOU/ECT@ect, Robert P
Virgo/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Kyle Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT, Duncan Croasdale/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Power Systems Mfg., LLC

Gentlemen, as you are likely aware, PSM has discovered certain fundamental
flaws with the FT4A9 engine that formed part of the PG&E mobile pac which ENA
purchased from PG&E as part of the Advanced Mobile Power Systems project.  As
you will recall, PG&E had difficulty starting the unit, apparently as a
result of a faulty gearbox in the original FT4A11 engine, and therefore we
agreed to swap out the A11 engine and replace it with the A9 engine.  It was
apparently represented to PSM by PG&E that the replacement A9 engine had been
completely overhauled.  PSM's testing and discussions with the shop that was
to have performed the overhaul, both of which occurred subsequent to closing,
have confirmed that the A9 was not overhauled but was simply serviced in
order to allow it to start.

PSM prepared a letter to send to PG&E demanding that the faulty A9 engine be
replaced with the original A11 engine.  I have reviewed that letter and
revised it substantially.  I enclose a copy of that letter as revised by me
for your review and comment.

Also, given that PSM was acting on ENA's behalf in performing the due
diligence on the PG&E unit and given that ENA relied on PSM's due diligence
in acquiring the PG&E unit, I have prepared an additional cover letter to
PSM.  I attach a copy of that cover letter for your review as well, which
letter is fairly aggressive in its current form.  It clearly identifies both
that (i) my comments on the PG&E letter are made only to protect and preserve
ENA's rights and interests and do not represent legal or other advice to PSM
regarding their position and may not be relied upon by PSM as such and (ii)
that we are preserving all of ENA's rights and causes of action that ENA may
have against PSM with respect to these matters.  It seems to me that, if the
engine is in fact in such poor condition, PSM should have discovered that
prior to our closing the deal.  I understand the PSM may have performed
boroscope testing on the original A11 engine but did not, for whatever
reason, perform the same test on the A9 prior to our closing the deal with
PG&E.  In any event, I realize that we have other issues to consider in our
approach to this, such as the finalization of the joint venture, under which
we have around $8 million at risk currently, and also that Principal
Investing is negotiating an equity position in PSM, so I will leave it up to
the commercial people as to how agressive we want to be.  Regardless, even if
we remove the last paragraph of the cover letter, I think that the point made
in the second paragraph regarding legal advice needs to remain.

Thanks

Greg


Online Auction benefiting March of Dimes

Wednesday, April 25 and Thursday, April 26
Auction opens promptly at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday and closes Thursday at 4:00
p.m.

To make your bid, click on:
http://my.home.enron.com  or
http://ecweb05e.enron.net/apps/auction.nsf/

Great items to bid on. 100% of proceeds benefiting March of Dimes. Don't miss
out!


HTTP/1.1 200
Server: Netscape-Enterprise/3.6 SP2
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:06:07 GMT
Content-type: text/x-oasis-csv
Connection: close

REQUEST_STATUS=200
ERROR_MESSAGE=
TIME_STAMP=20010420160607PD
VERSION=1.4
TEMPLATE=transstatus
OUTPUT_FORMAT=DATA
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_CODE=SPP
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_DUNS=959415852
RETURN_TZ=PD
DATA_ROWS=1
COLUMN_HEADERS=CONTINUATION_FLAG,ASSIGNMENT_REF,SELLER_CODE,SELLER_DUNS,CUSTOM
ER_CODE,CUSTOMER_DUNS,AFFILIATE_FLAG,PATH_NAME,POINT_OF_RECEIPT,POINT_OF_DELIV
ERY,SOURCE,SINK,CAPACITY_REQUESTED,CAPACITY_GRANTED,SERVICE_INCREMENT,TS_CLASS
,TS_TYPE,TS_PERIOD,TS_WINDOW,TS_SUBCLASS,NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY,OTHER_CURTA
ILMENT_PRIORITY,START_TIME,STOP_TIME,CEILING_PRICE,OFFER_PRICE,BID_PRICE,PRICE
_UNITS,PRECONFIRMED,ANC_SVC_LINK,ANC_SVC_REQ,POSTING_REF,SALE_REF,REQUEST_REF,
DEAL_REF,IMPACTED,COMPETING_REQUEST_FLAG,REQ
UEST_TYPE,RELATED_REF,NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG,STATUS,STATUS_NOTIFICATION,STATUS_
COMMENTS,TIME_QUEUED,RESPONSE_TIME_LIMIT,TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE,PRIMARY_PROVIDER_
COMMENTS,SELLER_REF,SELLER_COMMENTS,CUSTOMER_COMMENTS,SELLER_NAME,SELLER_PHONE
,SELLER_FAX,SELLER_EMAIL,CUSTOMER_NAME,CUSTOMER_PHONE,CUSTOMER_FAX,CUSTOMER_EM
AIL,REASSIGNED_REF,REASSIGNED_CAPACITY,REASSIGNED_START_TIME,REASSIGNED_STOP_T
IME
N,SPP
01007475,SPP,959415852,EPMI,848921276,N,CONTROL/HILLTOP,SVR55,HIL345,"CISO","P
AC",12,12,HOURLY,NON-FIRM,POINT_TO_POINT,PEAK,FIXED,W/O ANCILLARY
SRVCS,1,,20010420150000PD,20010420220000PD,6.9000,6.9000,6.9000,MW-HR,Y,SC:(SP
P:AR:SPP
01003082);,SC:M;,,,,,0,N,ORIGINAL,,,CONFIRMED,MAILTO:mark.guzman@enron.com;,,2
0010420115611PD,20010420122600PD,20010420140457PD,,,,,Carolyn
Bonari,(775)834-4180,(775)834-4296,sppc.oasis@sppc.com,Don
Norman,,(503)464-3740,lester.rawson@enron.com,,,,


Something to do on your breaks.

>  <<Elmo_1.exe>>

 - Elmo_1.exe


i probably will party tomorrow b/c it is going to be the best day of work
ever.  i actually kind of interviewed at csfb in nyc.  that would be huge if
you got a job with them.  i know two guys that work there.   if you are in
banking you better get used to 80-100 hours a week.  talk to you later
holmes.


STEVE KEAN

Subject: re: Executive Committee Meeting-April 9th.

Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date:  Monday, April 9th
Time:  11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video:  Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call: AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera
(713/853-5984)
  or Bill Dorsey (713/646-6505) for the weekly dial-in number and passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.

 Yes, I will attend in person ___X____

 By video conference from _______

 By conference call  _______

 No, I will not attend  _______

*  *  *

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday,
April 6th.

Thank you,
Bill Dorsey.


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-Path: <jim.griffin@compaq.com>
Received: from  rly-yh01.mx.aol.com (rly-yh01.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.33])
by air-yh01.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.21) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2001 04:12:48
-0500
Received: from  zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com
[161.114.64.103]) by rly-yh01.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.21) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Mar
2001 04:12:23 -0500
Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id
6C95AA777; Thu,  8 Mar 2001 04:12:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from excmun-gh01.eur.compaq.com (excmun-gh01.dem.cpqcorp.net
[16.41.92.160]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DBA8A3F5
for <Tbockius@aol.com>; Thu,  8 Mar 2001 04:12:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: by excmun-gh01.dem.cpqcorp.net with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2650.21) id <1VSV7Q1X>; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 10:12:18 +0100
Message-ID: <9DEEDE75746CD411B57A00508BAF306049FBB6@chcexc01.chc.cpqcorp.net>
From: "Griffin, Jim (CHC)" <Jim.Griffin@COMPAQ.com>
To: "'Tbockius@aol.com'" <Tbockius@aol.com>
Subject: RE: Newsflash
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 10:12:10 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

The payment is already scheduled (translation...I can't stop it).  Don't
worry, you'll get the money...I swear.  I pay all my US bills through the US
Postal electronic bill paying service.  It is actually a pretty cool
service.  They will do an electronic transfer or send a check to any company
and/or individual in the US.  I have used this service to pay all my bills
since I've left the US, and I have even used it to send my parents some
money.   I am the biggest fan of paying bills on-line now.  I wish I had
started doing it sooner.  I may never write a check again.

Below is my contact information:

Work:               Compaq Computer International
                Oberfeldstrasse 14
                8302 Kloten
                Switzerland

                Phone:  +41 58 444 5510

                Email:  Jim.Griffin@Compaq.com

Temporary Housing:      Bienenstrasse 7
                8004 Z_rich
                Switzerland

                Phone: +41  1 495 7527

Home (after 4/1/01):        Greifenseestrasse 53
                8050 Z_rich
                Switzerland

                I won't have a phone number until I move in.

Send me the information when ever you get around to it.  I am in no hurry.
I just wanted to know when I have to pay the balance.

Later

Jim Griffin
Compaq Computer Corporation
EMEA CPCG Finance
Tel. Kloten +41 58 444 5510
Jim.Griffin@Compaq.com

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Tbockius@aol.com [mailto:Tbockius@aol.com]
Sent:   Wednesday, March 07, 2001 8:47 PM
To: Griffin, Jim (CHC)
Subject:    Re: Newsflash

Jim,

I'm having a very busy day, but sometime in the next week, I'll call
atlantis
and ask if they have a non 1-800 # so that you can call them directly and
give them your credit card info.  In fact, if you would like to do that for
the deposit and ask them to credit me, don't send me a check in the mean
time.  If that is not convenient for you, please give me your address so
that
I can forward on the info I receive from Atlantis to you.


Sounds good.

We went to Palacios last weekend.  The water was very silty from the rain,
and the tide was low.  There were a few black drum, but not much else.  We
did find a stone crab, which was a first.

Kay

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 11/28/2000 08:09:58 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Kay,

I have a conflict Wed afternoon.  But can catch up on Thurs with you and
Kent.

Meanwhile, please send me an e-copy of the LM Exhibits.  I can do a quick
redline of those that change.  I've already marked up w/ red pen, the ESA
Electrobolt + the Summary of terms sheet (ala Dale's on LV II).

Thanks,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 3:14 PM
To: michael.barnas@ps.ge.com; stephen.swift@ps.ge.com;
lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com; kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com;
Lisa.Bills@enron.com; Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com;
Sheila.Tweed@enron.com; Scott.Dieball@enron.com; Ben.Jacoby@enron.com
Cc: Suzanne.Adams@enron.com
Subject: Weekly GE Conference Call

Dear Turbine Torture Club Members:

The purpose of this email is to confirm that we will have a conference call
this Wednesday, November 29 at 130 CT.  The following items have been
suggested for the agenda:

Form of consent to assignment agreement (draft circulated) - to be used for
LM's and Frames, if possible.
Assignment language - new language being tortured within the Enron ranks,
to GE soon.
Limit of liability, indemnity, etc. - Enron owes GE a position on this.

In addition, it seems to me that the following equipment will be "moving"
soon:

City of Austin LM's (to be assigned to ENA, then NEPCO)
LM's for the ESA project
PSCO, LV CoGen, the remaining LM's, Pastoria, Blue Dog (all to DevCo,
right?)

I suggest that we address any commercial, financial or legal issues
outstanding concerning the assignment of these turbines.

There may be others who need to be involved in the call, and there may be
additional issues.  Please advise.

Thanks,

Kay


Your timing is excellent--I suspect by design!  Thanks for the email.  If you have time, I'd love to grab a drink--it probably is time we meet.  I too hear great things about your talents.

Regards,

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Banky, Brad" <brad.banky@cinergy.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Banky+2C+20Brad+22+20+3Cbrad+2Ebanky+40cinergy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, June 20, 2001 11:30 AM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	Rob Bogucki

Jeff-
Greetings.  Although we never met, your reputation and success precedes you.
I back this man's skill sets both professionally and personally.  If you
ever have a question please call.  Hope to get a chance to meet you in
person.

Brad Banky
Director Financial Trading
Cinergy Marketing and Trading LLC
713-393-6873
1100 Louisiana
Suite 4900
Houston, Texas  77002


Hi Carlos

If things aren't better next week, I may need ask for your help (ie, dump
this).  It depends on how Delta and Yazoo City shake out.  Hopefully, it
won't be too bad.

Be sure to check out the black line.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/04/2001 01:43
PM ---------------------------

"DeBerry, Jeremiah A." <JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com> on 04/02/2001
11:14:08 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@Enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>, "'JKeffer@KSlaw.com'"
<JKeffer@KSlaw.com>
cc: "'Michael.Young@NorthWestern.com'" <Michael.Young@NorthWestern.com>,
"Kahn, Marguerite R." <MargueriteKahn@paulhastings.com>

Subject: Turbine Purchase - Letter Agreement

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/02/01 12:14:16
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of
conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are
two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.
If you have any questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."

==============================================================================

In connection with  the above referenced matter, attached for your review
are?clean and  blacklined copies of the Letter Agreement.? The blacklined
copy has been  marked to indicate changes made to the initial draft provided
by  Enron.
?
Please note that the  attached draft of the Letter Agreement has not been
reviewed by NorthWestern,  and therefore remains subject, in all respects, to
NorthWestern's review and  comments.?
?
Please contact me  with any questions or comments.
************************************************
Jeremiah A. DeBerry, Esq.
Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker  LLP
399 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Phone: (212) 318-6458
Fax:???? (212)  319-4090
?
?
 - Clean Copy -  LETTER AGREEMENT.wpd
 - BLACKLINE -  LETTER AGREEMENT.wpd


Thanks for you message.  I am glad to know that you like what you see in the
office to date.  I am planning a trip to Chicago soon, so I will look forward
to seeing you there.


Thought you might be interested in this message that went out to all Enron
employees.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001 10:12 AM -----

	Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling@ENRON
	Sent by: Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling@ENRON
	03/13/2001 04:17 PM

		 To: All Enron Worldwide
		 cc:
		 Subject: California Energy Crisis

California,s power crisis has generated heated debate over the last several
months.  Unfortunately, this debate has generated more heat than light.  We
want you to know what the facts are and what we are doing about the crisis.
Please spend a few minutes reading the following overview on the situation
and our position on California energy issues.

What happened in California

The source of California,s current problem is as straightforward as supply
and demand.  California,s economy grew 29 percent since 1998.  This increased
the demand for electricity by 24 percent.  At the same time, regulatory
restrictions prevented new generation from getting built in the state.  So
demand grew but regulations prevented supplies from being added.  The result,
predictably, is a shortage.  This summer, peak capacity will be about 10
percent shy of peak demand, leading to further blackouts in the state.

In addition to the supply and demand imbalance, there are two other related
factors that led to the current crisis.  First, the state,s regulations
forced all sales and purchases into the spot market.  The spot market for
power is extraordinarily volatile.  The way firms behave in a free market
when faced with such volatility is to construct a portfolio of purchases long
term, medium term and short term, to reduce exposure to this volatility.  In
California, state regulation prevented this strategy.  This would be the
equivalent of putting the entire state on an adjustable rate mortgage in the
most volatile interest rate environment imaginable.  Everything was fine
while the power surplus persisted, but when shortages ensued, every megawatt
was purchased at the sky rocketing spot price.

Second, retail markets were not deregulated.  Regulated retail rates remained
in effect, and stranded cost recovery charges were structured to keep
competition out.  This meant that utilities were forced to pay high wholesale
prices in the spot market but were only able to recover costs at the
regulated retail rate.  They are now nearly bankrupt.

In short, California,s problems were caused by regulation, not deregulation.
Regulations prevented competitors from entering the market, prevented new
generation from being built, and prevented prudent hedging against volatile
spot prices.

At the time California was developing its restructuring plan, Enron warned
the state,s policy makers about these risks and proposed alternatives, which,
if adopted, would have averted the current crisis.

Enron,s Role

Many political leaders in the state have elected to fix blame rather than fix
the problem.  Power sellers, including Enron, have been vilified by the
politicians and the media.  Here are the facts:

? Other than a small amount of wind power, Enron is not a generator in the
state of California.  Every megawatt we sold in California we bought in the
same market available to other California purchasers.  Because we are a
market maker, not a generator, we are not biased toward high prices.  We are
interested only in having a market that works so that we can package products
for our customers.
? As a seller to end-use markets in the state, we provided protection from
the problems the states, utilities, and their customers, now face.  We
protected, and still protect, our customers from price volatility.

You may have read that EES recently elected to have the utilities supply
power directly to its customers in California instead of procuring power on
the open market.  Early reports mischaracterized this as a &turnback8 of our
customers to the utilities.  Here are the facts:

? As a result of a variety of factors existing in the current California
market, it made more sense for EES to source power for its customers directly
from the utilities.  This decision reduced EES,s market price risk by
allowing EES to access lower utility rates.
? EES did not terminate any customer contracts, and our customers continue to
receive the financial benefits of their contract prices.
? EES is continuing to work with its California customers to provide them
with other energy-related products and services, including assistance in
reducing the demand for power, particularly at peak times.

Enron is currently proposing solutions to help California work out of its
crisis; Enron continues to sign up customers in the state; and Enron
continues to actively manage its risks and capture opportunities in Western
power markets.  Enron,s primary business is managing risk for our customers
with solutions customized to meet their needs.  There has never been more
demand for our products and services.

The Solution

The solution to California,s crisis is also straightforward.  In summary, the
state must increase supply, reduce demand, reduce reliance on the spot market
and shore up the financial stability of the state,s utilities.

Increasing Supply

California,s process for siting and permitting new generation is nothing
short of Byzantine.  Enron has built plants elsewhere in the country in less
than a year.  In California, it often takes 5 to 7 years.  California simply
must streamline this process.  Ironically, while many of the regulations
generators must overcome are aimed at improving environmental quality, the
regulations are preventing new clean technology from coming online and
displacing current plants, which emit 40 times as much NOx.  California can
have abundant power and cleaner air by expediting the permitting of new
facilities.

Reducing Demand

Customers in California today have no incentive to reduce or shift demand.
They pay the same rate no matter what the market price is.  An open retail
market would trigger demand responses, which would balance supply and demand
at lower prices than today.  California should fully open its retail market.

Reducing Reliance on the Spot Market

In a truly deregulated market, customers would protect themselves from
volatile spot prices by purchasing some of their requirements on a longer
term, fixed-price basis.  The state has instead left procurement in the hands
of the utilities, which it has forced to buy exclusively in the spot market.
Opening the market at the retail level will give customers control over their
price risk.

Restoring the Financial Integrity of the State,s Institutions

The utilities in California are not paying their bills.  This has led to
greater uncertainty in the market, higher costs, and reduced flexibility to
arrive at lasting solutions.  California must permit its utilities to recover
their costs so they can pay their bills and invest in the transmission and
distribution assets necessary to get power from where it is to where it is
needed.

Just as important as doing these things, the state must avoid policies that,
while politically attractive, do not fix the problem or even make matters
worse.  Price caps have been proposed.  They don,t work; have never worked;
and they will not work here.  Price caps succeed only in creating shortages,
which then have to be allocated among competing users.  Imagine how
ineffectively the government would be in determining, for example, whether it
is better to make its limited power supplies available to the Imperial Valley
or Silicon Valley.  Price caps are a surefire way to make the current
shortage worse.

The state has also proposed to take over generation and transmission in
California.  There is no reason to believe, and every reason to doubt, that
the state will be more effective than free markets at investing in,
constructing, operating and maintaining assets.  This will also result in
California tax revenues being spent on power transmission and power
generation -- which the private sector can do -- instead of education, roads
and other public goods -- which the private sector cannot do.

As you are approached by people outside the company or are learning about the
crisis from the media, it,s important for you to know this:  We at Enron will
continue to serve our customers and we will continue to propose real
solutions to the state.


I have asked Russell to add you both to his distribution list.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
04/12/99 11:03 AM ---------------------------

Russell Diamond
04/12/99 10:02 AM
To: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meryl
Barnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew R
Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Coi Dang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia
FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracey Lacina/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kelly Lovvorn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin McGowan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlie Nhan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diem Phan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle
Schultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Weller/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Allen K Wolf/SF/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Wong/SF/ECT@ECT,
Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Zurita/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Austin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald M- ECT Origination Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Winston
Cheng/SF/ECT@ECT, Paul Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, Dave Eichinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, David L
Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven T Fyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian O'Rourke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S
Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd R Orosco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frances Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eva Pao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth S
Perlman/LON/ECT@ECT, Bo Petersen/LON/ECT@ECT, Greg F Piper/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alfred Pollard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Posoli/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Race/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elizabeth A Resendiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M
Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzy Robey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve -HPL- Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregory L Sharp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Axton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harold
Bertram/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard A Blandford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kevin T Brady/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol Ann
Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Larry G Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cauthen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynda
Clemmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Coleman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Courtney/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Cox/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles Decker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Di Ann
DeLaRue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, David L
Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, William C Falbaum/HOU/ECT@ECT, James B
Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Flores-Cuellar/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H
Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Grevelle/LON/ECT@ECT, Thomas D Gros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Halgren/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Nicole Cortez/DEN/ECT@ECT, Kayvan Malek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy M
Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
McClendon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Mends/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brent Spiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jung-Suk
Suh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe A
Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janelle Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George N Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T
Lucci/DEN/ECT@ECT, Joseph Graham/HOU/EES@EES, Steve Morse/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Watch List

Attached is the updated Credit Watch listing.  If there are any personnel in
your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that
they receive a copy of this report.

To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Russell Diamond at x5-7095.

For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Brant Reves at
x3-9897, Russell Diamond at 5-7095, or the Global Hotline at x3-1803.


Tyrell, what is status of documents.

Call me on my cell phone. 713-302-6442.


thanks


i called this guy and will give you an update.  i may try to see him next
week in london.


Lorraine -- answers to some of your questions.

Questar Line 90 Company purchased the facilities from ARCO for a total of $38
million.  At the time it made its FERC application, Questar Southern Trails'
estimated cost of 1) purchasing the facilities from Line 90 Company and 2)
converting the line to gas service via the construction of compressor
stations and various pipeline replacements, realignments and extension:  155
million.  I assume you want more detail so I'll have Mike Vannorden get the
relevant exhibits.

Southern Trails proposed to install 7 new compressor stations.  These are
detailed on Table 1 in their application cover letter (on my desk if you want
to take a look).  The various pipeline modifications they proposed to make
are described in some detail on pages 12 - 16.

Available capacity:  120,000 Dth/day in West Zone; 87,500 in East Zone.

I will have Mike send you exhibits I believe might be of interest.


Mr. Kaminski,

You will need to speak with David Kilgore at kilgore@rice.edu or by calling
David at 713-348-5378 regarding getting set up in EMBANET and if you can
have access the database from the outside.

Kathy

At 02:40 PM 1/23/01 -0600, you wrote:

>Kathy,
>
>What is EMBANET? Do I have access from the outside?
>
>
>Vince Kaminski
>
>
>
>
>Kathy Spradling <spradlin@rice.edu> on 01/11/2001 11:01:48 AM
>
>To:   (Recipient list suppressed)
>cc:   cmiller@rice.edu, castro@rice.edu, spradlin@rice.edu
>Subject:  Spring 2001 Schematic
>
>
>Spring 2001 Faculty,
>
>The Spring 2001 Schematic has been posted to EMBANET.  To access the
>Schematic please open the JGSM Area icon on the EMBANET desktop.  Next
>please open the Announcement JGSM icon.  You will find the Spring 2001
>Schematic located under the Subject column.  Please open the document.  If
>you do not have access to EMBANET you will need to speak with David Kilgore
>at kilgore@rice.edu or by calling David at 713-348-5378.
>
>Thanks,
>Kathy
>
>Kathy M. Spradling
>MBA Program Coordinator
>Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management
>Rice University
>6100 Main Street, MS 531
>Houston, Texas  77005-1892
>Phone:  (713) 348-3313
>Fax:  (713) 348-5251
>Email:  spradlin@rice.edu
>http://www.rice.edu/jgs
>E-mail:  spradlin@rice.edu
>http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jgs/

Kathy M. Spradling
MBA Program Coordinator
Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
6100 Main Street, MS 531
Houston, Texas  77005-1892
Phone:  (713) 348-3313
Fax:  (713) 348-5251
Email:  spradlin@rice.edu
http://www.rice.edu/jgs
E-mail:  spradlin@rice.edu
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jgs/


Mike Swerzbin said okay to off-peak on these deals. They've been changed.

Thanks,
Kate


Attached is the draft interconnect agreement.