John,

Further to the voice message that I left you, I have recalculated the amount
of security that would be required if all of the modified direct sales
contracts are acknowledged by noon January 4.  The calculations are still a
bit rough but I thought this spreadsheet would provide you with something to
review.  I have used a $35 Pool Price in the calculations.  Note the
additional tabs in the spreadsheet that detail the hourly generation that
the Pool has received for SD3 and SD4 .

In determining the actual security required, we will need to review the
megawatts in the contracts registered in detail once we have the
acknowledgements tomorrow.  For simplicity I have assumed that everything is
base load and I know this is not correct.  Once we know exactly what
contracts we are looking at, we can fine tune the calculation.

 <<December SD3 and SD4.xls>>

Carol Moline
Financial Controller
Power Pool of Alberta
(403) 233-4686
carol.moline@powerpool.ab.ca

 - December SD3 and SD4.xls


CO 1617 Departs Louisville at 3:10PM
Arrive IAH at 4:22PM


Here's the attachement noted below.

Andrea Yowman
01/05/2001 12:17 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brian Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Follow-up on Performance Feedback Training

Steve and Cindy,

Brian, Sharon Michelle and I met today to discuss the strategy for
Performance Feedback Training and decided on the following.
The presentation should be updated to reflect the PRC process, relative
ranking and preferred distribution. (attached)
Brian Schaffer will complete the Houston training sessions next week.
The HR Community within the BU's need to be trained and armed with
information to better address questions and concerns from Managers,
Supervisors and employees on the process.
A "Mandatory" global HR  training/meeting should be held Tuesday January 16th
and kicked off by Steve Kean and Cindy Olson.  Brian will prepare an invite
communication.  (Probably at the Double Tree or Hyatt and other locations
video / tele conference)
An eSeak should be held week of  January 16th on Performance Management.
The HR Heads should send out a separate communication to their people to
reinforce attendance to this meeting/training.
A separate communication should be sent out to 'employees' and 'Superviors
below Manager'  on the PRC process.  Brian will prepare a draft of the
communication.

Please give us your thoughts on this approach.  You can contact Brian,
Michelle, Sharon or me if you have specific questions.
ay


No thanks, but I did pick up a pre-owned Jaguar...sweet!  Congrats to you
too.  Hope to see you out again soon...Thanks again for your help with Coal
info.

Fletch


Hi Jewel,

Sorry, I was not available to visit with you when you called the other day,
but things have been extremely busy around here, and plus, there is very
little room for privacy.

In answer to your question, there are no special requirements.  Back in the
day, they would have been looking for actual pipeline scheduling experience,
but anymore, the liquidity for gas schedulers is so low, that they will
consider most people, with an analytical or coordinative type background.  I
think it's one of those things that once you "get your foot in the door", you
can move on from there.

Just be aware, that if you were to become a gas scheduler, it may require
working on weekends, and late nights from time to time.

As far as the next step, I would suggest that you just simply send an e-mail
to George Smith, Manager of Logistics on the Central Desk, and ask him if he
has time to visit with you.  I think that by simply expressing an interest,
and learning what his expectations are of a scheduler, and also, learning
what you can expect to learn from him, should serve as the first step.
Also, if he is interested, and does not have a position currently open, then
he will pass on your name to some of the other managers.  They're actually
pretty good about that!  I'll mention to George that you may give him a call.

Let me know if you have any further questions, or want to visit some more!

Take care!


Welcome to this week's edition of The Chicago Brain Trust, "a humorous
look at the Chicago-area's e-business community."

As always, if you're looking for our signature cartoons, boogie on over
to <http://chicagobraintrust.com/retinalimages.htm>, and while you're at
it, check out our fine selection of daily comic strips at
<http://chicagobraintrust.com/comics.htm>.

And now, on with the show, and an even more Chicago-centric edition...

-Todd Allen
Chief Executive Smart-Ass
The Chicago Brain Trust

==============================================================================
==
Warning: There is no truth in any of the materials in this newsletter,
except by satirical inference.
==============================================================================
==

National Association For Acquiring Wealthy Spouses Revises Internet
Executive Ratings

(Chicago, IL) In an emergency summit, preceding their annual convention,
the National Association For Acquiring Wealthy Spouses (NAFAWS) revised
their ratings for eligible singles in the profession of Internet
executive.

"It was very trendy, two years ago, to marry an Internet executive,"
Mindi Newman, NAFAWS president-elect told reports.  "The salaries were
huge, the stock options plentiful, and the little dears were always at
the office, so you had your time to yourself."

It seems the dot-bomb phenomenon has tempered long-term expectations on
the worth of Internet executives as marital partners.  The stock market
plunge has sent net-worth's plummeting overnight and liquid assets have
been eaten up during periods of unemployment, causing some NAFAWS
members to set their sights on mates in more traditional lines of work,
like petroleum executive, physician and trust fund recipient.

"The problem with Internet executives isn't so much the salary as the
volatility of assets," Newman explained.  "Given the high divorce rate
amongst our members, a rapidly fluctuating net worth, commonly caused by
assets like stock options suffering through bear and bull markets, can
make timing the market for a divorce problematic.  If you finalize your
settlement when the stock is at a temporary peak and it bottoms out
before you can cash out, what was the point of the marriage?

"Similarly, the culture of vesting schedules amongst Internet executives
has influenced their pre-nuptial agreements.  In some severe cases,
Internet executives are limiting the assets available in case of divorce
on a sliding scale determined by the length of the marriage.
Ironically, prior to the proliferation of stock options that made these
Internet works so attractive as partners, a vesting schedule was unheard
of in matrimonial matters.  Now it limits their appeal."

NAFAWS has officially downgraded the rating of Internet executives to
Hold from Accumulate Dates.

"While the lack of meaningful stock options is a minus, these executives
are still drawing decent salaries, in many cases," Newman elaborated.
"As there is always a chance the market will rebound and their earnings
potential will rise.  As such, we have lowered them to a Hold rating,
instead of a Dump rating.  We do have the caveat that male NAFAWS
members should continue to Accumulate Dates with female Internet
Executives, as there are relatively few of them and their availability
should dry up quickly in the case of a market upswing."

********Advert**************************************
Want to laugh at something besides business?

Indignant Online... because ATTITUDE matters

http://www.indignantonline.com

...we have sports, too
********Advert**************************************

BRAIN DEAD
In the words of Shaggy
By The Big Head

While I don't normally like to do local stories, I felt some recent
activities warranted such action.

Recently the state of Illinois announced they were voting to cut the
funding for technology by about $20MM.  I found this incredulous, until
I started to think about the way things really work here in our lovely
state.

What I have come to realize is that no one really accepts
responsibility. It is all about protecting personal and political turf.
While most of our leaders talk a good game, in reality very little gets
done.

Why is that I began to ponder?  Is it lack of vision?  Fortitude?
Support? Funding? Belief? Testicals?  What exactly could it be?

Last time I checked, technology was the fastest growing industry and
sector.  It had the highest paying jobs and the potential for the most
substantial increase in the tax revenue.

Why then would the state vote to cut the funding?  Additionally, why did
the coalition, wait until a single week before the vote to attempt to
rally the troops?  How much of a difference could we really make in just
under a week?

While we don't yet know the outcome of the vote, it begat a train of
thought.  This led me to question all sorts of issues, many of which
remain unresolved and a few of which I am throwing in just for the hell
of it.

While it is often quoted, "the story you are about to hear is real, the
names have been changed to protect the innocent", none of that such
shannangry (that is a president Bush word if you were unsure) will occur
here.  No, we are not protecting the names of the innocent, because in
our opinion, most of them are not innocent.

If you are reading this outside of Chicago, feel free to drop the names
in of your own local leaders; I'm sure it will be as relevant.

Last, the following has the most dramatic impact if you have ever heard
the song by the quasi rap/reggae artist Shaggy.  He has a great song
titled, "it wasn't me".  The premise is, whenever someone accuses you of
doing something, or expected you to do something, your patented response
is....."It wasn't me".

With that, let's play our little song:  After each question, follow it
with the answer; "It Wasn't Me!"  (Shortened after each question to
"IWM" to save me from typing)

Shaye Mandle; I thought you were supposed to have more pull than this?
IWM

Governor Ryan; I thought you were supposed to fight harder for your
technology initiatives? IWM

Illinois Coalition; I thought you were supposed to do more than 3 panels
a quarter? IWM

IDFA: I thought you were supposed to give out all of you 16 million or
so over 3 years? IWM

DECCA: I thought after your Boeing win, you would be able to save the
technology budget?  IWM

Katherine Gehl: I hoped you would have an initiative that would make an
impact on Chicago and would have stuck by your guns with the McKinsey
report? IWM

Flip Filipowski: I though you were an incubator company who would
protect and nurture your investment companies? IWM

David Weinstein: I thought you would have sense not to spend $30 Million
in 8 months? IWM

Bill Lederer: I thought you would more closely watch your money,
especially when $23 Million was being spent with no customer
acquisition? IWM

Mayor Daley: I thought you had more clout than to let flip pull out of
the Skyscraper fund and the local investment community to consistently
fool you into thinking they were supporting the local technology
community? IWM

A local VC: an early stage investment? IWM

Jim Downing (IVCA); an attempt to address what McKinsey points out is a
detriment to Chicago in the lack of early stage investing? IWM

Skyscraper fund; I thought you were supposed to invest in Chicago
companies, last I checked Schaumburg companies don't pay Chicago taxes?
IWM

Michael Gray; I thought you were supposed to invest the money into local
startups? IWM

Local Entrepreneurs: I thought you were supposed to learn how to read a
balance sheet, wisely spend money, and know what the sales cycle is for
your product? IWM

The universities; I thought you were supposed to develop a good
technology transfer program so students could and would be encouraged to
start businesses and remain in Illinois? IWM

First Tuesday and Big Frontier: I thought you would realize that
eventually, if none of the companies have any money to buy the services,
eventually the sponsors will get smart, figure that out and quite
sponsoring? IWM

Ron May: I thought you would figure out that if all you do is report
negativity and lay offs, ultimately there will be no companies left to
report anything on at all? IWM

Prairie Angels: I thought if you are an Angel group you were supposed to
actually make an investment? IWM

Pate Phillips: I thought you were above holding a grudge for not being
included in the Boeing deal? IWM

Prairie Fire: I thought you were going to pick the top 10 companies who
had the best chance of getting funded....and then actually help them?
IWM

TIE: I thought you would announce the rules of participation BEFORE an
event when it came to the opportunity to present to the Prairie Angels?
IWM

John Stroiber of Fast Record: I really hoped you could hold out longer?
IWM

The recent company requesting info on ProofSpace: Where were you a year
ago when they actually needed a client? IWM

Anyone who could have invested in PayPal; I hoped one of our local
Investors would have recognized a good technology before they left for
the west coast and raised $175 Million in Funding? IWM

And the beat goes on.  So, there you have it, next time you hear someone
say something that you know isn't true, or doesn't make any sense,
realize what there answer will be; "It wasn't me!"

The Big Head

********Advert**************************************
What?!? You haven't subscribed to The Chicago Brain Trust yet?

Get with the program, click here:
http://thechicagobraintrust.com/subscriptions.htm

Enough, already!
********Advert**************************************

New Tissues Headlines for Week of 5-29

5-28-2001 (Chicago)  e. e. Cummings Risen From Grave and Naming
Dot.Com's
Researchers at the University of Chicago's Venkman School of
Parapsychology have detected paranormal activity surrounding local
Internet firms.  "i-Street, ePrairie, iExplore, eFiltration, iGive,
marchFIRST, divine interVentures... it's obvious," said Professor Randi
of the Venkman School.  "The punctuation style is clearly the work of
the ghost of e.e. Cummings, with his famous capitalization quirks,
exerting influence over unwitting executives trying to name their
companies."
Professor Randi first became aware of the ghost, when marchFIRST
contacted her in search of an explanation for their company's name.
Unfortunately, early attempts at exorcisms have only resulted in the
firm going out of business, but Professor Randi assures the CBT that the
Venkman School, funded by executives looking for a convenient excuse,
will endeavor to find a less fatal way to remove the Cummings influence
from the tech scene.

5-28-2001  (Chicago).  Skyscraper Fund is Reconstituted, Selects First
Three Deals.
After falling on hard times this winter when Divine, Inc. withdrew its
financial support, the Skyscraper Fund could not follow through on its
mandate to Fund Chicago start-ups.  However all is well with since the
City was able to find $12-$15 in supporting revenues. As a result, the
Fund announced it's first three investments: BlueMeteor.com,
BeautyJungle.com and Eppraisals.com.
"We called over to each to let them know we have selected them, but they
haven't returned our calls," said Skyscraper bigwig Jim Tyree. "I'm sure
they'll get back to us soon. They have such sterling business plans,
they're probably just too busy to telephone."

5-29-2001 (Springfield) Heavy Lobbying from Illinois Coalition Results
in Restoration of Tech in State Budget.
In a strange reversal, State funds were restored to the budget at the
last minute.  "Wow, that was close," said Shaye Mandel, the State's key
tech czar.  Fifteen minutes before presentation to the legislature, the
funds mysteriously appeared. All lobbying by Chicago's high-tech
community late last week seemed to go nowhere, leaving it unlikely that
state lawmakers would restore $21.3 million in technology.
But Mandel took another tact, which seemed to work.  "I contacted the
low-tech community, principally Vito Boomba, (aka "Vinny da Violinist")
and he said he's have 'a conversation wit Pate'," Shaye said. Word is
Vito said, "Eh, dat Pate guy came tru and since he went wit the money
showin up in da budget, he looks better dan he wood if he was part of da
new runways at Midway." Word on the street is that Vito "invested" in
Fermi Lab: "'Cause you gotta take care of dem piasans." No one
volunteered to tell Vito that Fermi's been dead for 40 years.

5-29-2001  (Evanston)  Brain Drain from Chicago's Business Schools
Slows.
The latest statistics show fewer members of the graduating classes at
Northwestern's Kellogg Graduate School of Management and the University
of Chicago's Graduate School of Business are heading west than in recent
years. "They seem to be heading for the beach," a Kellogg staffer was
cited as saying.  "Of course, when summer's over, they might be heading
to these locations in California they put on their forwarding
addresses." She continued.
An informal poll of business school graduates taken by the CBT indicated
that when asked if Chicago would be considered as a job location;
giggles and outfight guffaws immediately followed. In one case, this
reporter was asked which drug was I using, because "that would be
excellent, dude - especially if I stay in Chicago."

5-30-2001 (Oak Brook) McDonald's Adopts Payment Technology - and Gets
Gas in the Process.
 In its ongoing quest to cut service times for fast food, McDonald's
Corp. Monday said it's employing high-tech electronic payment systems to
speed the fast food gas payment process. "We can't get the food to you
quicker, but we can take your money faster," a company spokesperson was
quoted as saying. By using a payment device designed by Exxon Mobil
Corp. for use at its Mobil gas stations, McDonald's expects to let the
system charge your gastric discomfort to your favorite credit card.
"The idea came to us when we realized a significant by-product of our
food was gas. So why not charge for it just like Mobil does?" When
explained that the gas they were talking about was different than what
Mobil dispensed, the spokesperson seemed disappointed. "Huh? Well, I
guess we could just use it to pay for the food, I suppose," Was the
retort.

5-31-2001 (Chicago)  Survey Debunks Theory of Lack of Venture Investment
Money in Chicago.
The Illinois Venture Capital Association released its latest survey on
the state of venture Capital Money in Chicago.  "Our statistics show
that there is a 20% gain in investment capital in this City," cited IVCA
Executive Director Jim Downing. "Just because we haven't invested in
anything here doesn't mean there isn't any money available."
When queried about local investments in the near future, Downing
indicated that IVCA's first priority was to fund a high-tech PR firm
that could tout the " . . . absolute tons of investments we might make
in the upcoming year. After all, you just saw how we promoted pro-growth
legislative initiatives in Illinois with our assistance on the State
budget."

5-31-2001 (Chicago)  Illinois Development Finance Authority (IDFA)
Announces $470,000 in Investments - A Host of Firms to Follow in the
Next 6 Months.
The Illinois Development Finance Authority announced investments in
three companies.  "Now all we have to do is make 120 more investments in
the next six months and we've reached our goal," Nora Blizfig said.  "If
we review 5 business plans a week and put together 100 panels, we'll
have no trouble giving out the $20 million we're chartered to
release."
When queried by CBT staff as to why only 3 companies received funds
since January, Ms. Blizfig recounted, "Well, er, we got a slow start,
but we're really humming now."  Asked if she could name any companies
under consideration, she cited Blue Meteor and Eppraisals.com. As the
first step in the process, companies seeking funds were invited to send
their business plans to State Senator Pate Phillips.

********Advert**************************************
The BIGfrontier BIG Bandwidth Birthday Bash
DATE:       Tuesday, June 12, 2001
LOCATION:   Drink Nightclub, 702 West Fulton Street, Chicago
COST:       FREE - and the first drink's always on us!
INFO:       http://www.bigfrontier.org (312) 923-7601
********Advert**************************************

SHOCK THERAPY
Selecting "Men In Black and Blue"

By I.P. Daley
Editor In Chief

Todd Allen, our "resident and chief Smart-Ass" approached me during one
of my lucent moments last week, griping that we have a Women in Black
program in town but no Men in Black.  For those of you who have been
locked away even further and longer than yours truly, Women in Black is
program that annually celebrates the achievement of women in the tech
community.

Todd was upset that we don't do the same for those of the other gender,
but I had to take the politically correct posture, as I was seated at
the time, and inform him that men don't need to be recognized for their
contribution to tech as women do, because we already get plenty of
notoriety.

This did not seem to mollify Todd, but as we debated (as I drifted in
and out), it occurred to me that I was partially right, but not
completely so - and in a flash of brilliance, it struck me (or was that
my nurse?): WE DO NEED TO CELEBRATE MEN IN CHICAGO TECH - BUT WHAT WE
NEED TO CELEBRATE IS MASCULINE FAILURE!

Think of it; 20 men selected each year, or whenever we get around to it,
for their contribution to the Chicago Tech Wreck!  And as such black is
appropriate - you know - as in mourning. Well, after Todd stopped
laughing, we sat down with The Big Head and started throwing some
suggestions out:

David Wienstein, for his ability to spend more money faster than a drunk
at the dice tables in Las Vegas (and he didn't even get lucky, so I
hear).
Bob Bernard, for his excellent management of March (or is it April)
First.
Bill Lederer, for his great foresight in investing in a wonderful string
of successful e-companies.
Andrew, "Flip" Filipowski, for reinventing divine interVentures into a
"software company" at the expense of their 40 incubated (more like
roasted) start-ups.
Ron May, for ensuring that no self-respecting investor would show up in
a town with so, so many failures.
Mohan Sawhney, for his perfect batting average on Internet business
predictions.
Bill Schermer, for focusing and spending more money on marketing than on
actual sales creation.

But we picked the easy ones, now you get to rack your brains, scratch
your ____ and fill out the field.  Send your picks to me
IPDaley@thechicagobraintrust.com and we'll publish them. Please, in the
interest of our audience's average age of 11 and their sensitivity, keep
you language to only the highest level when describing your selection's
reason for nomination. And don't come up with any women either, we had a
few in mind, but this is "Men in Black and Blue", not "Dufuses in Black
and Blue".

After a week or so or when you people run out of ink, our e-mail server
crashes from overload, or we get served with a lawsuit by the feminist
community, Todd, the Head and your Editor will put our heads, or other
parts of our anatomy, together and pick the best twenty.

The Prize, you ask?  Give us some time and we'll come up with something,
but you may suggest that as well.

Until next week or when they release me,

I.P.

********Advert**********************************************************
SITEVSIONS.com - WEB DEVELOPMENT AT REASONABLE PRICES

If you are a small to medium-sized company and you are looking for an
entry level or a medium-sized website at a very reasonable price,
contact us.  We offer all major development tools and a full line of
products such as e-commerce shopping cart development, auction software,
bulk e-mail, and we have these products priced aggressively.

Our websites begin at $2,500 for a starter site and run up to the low
six figures for huge, robust e-commerce applications.

See sample work at: www.sitevisions.com/2001/portfolio.htm

Contact us at sales@sitevisions.com or call 312-364-9438 x 224.
********Advert**********************************************************

This has been a production of the Chicago Brain Trust.  All materials
are copyright 2001, The Chicago Brain Trust, all rights reserved.

For more mayhem, visit the Chicago Brain Trust at
http://www.chicagobraintrust.com

======================================================================
UNSUBSCRIBE INSTRUCTIONS:

Your e-mail address [whalley@enron.com] is in our mailing list. If you
would like to remove yourself from this list, please click:
http://sitevisions.Unitymail.Net/UM/U.asp?A2765.11454.16462
and you will be removed immediately! Or simply REPLY to this
message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the BODY. Thank you!


All --

Attached are PG&E's Reply Comments in the PG&E California Gas Transmission
open season docket, A.01-06-020.

After readying the "hardcopy" comments for service by U.S. Mail, a couple of
typos came to our attention.  We have corrected the typos in this e-mail.

This e-mail contains two files:

1.  A "redline" version showing typo corrections/changes from the hardcopy
version sent out by U.S. Mail.

1.  A file showing the redlines "accepted."

David W. Anderson, PG&E Law Department 415-973-6659

 <<Email redline PGE Reply Comments.rtf>>  <<Email PGE Reply Comments.rtf>>

 - Email redline PGE Reply Comments.rtf
 - Email PGE Reply Comments.rtf


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041722.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001
10:59 AM ---------------------------

Julie Meyers
01/25/2001 10:27 AM
To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denver Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, Jody
Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Ryder/NA/Enron@Enron, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruce Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: NAME CHANGE

Southern Company Energy Marketing, LP has changed its name to Mirant Americas
Energy Marketing, LP.  It was a name overlay so you won't see Southern in the
system anymore.

Phillip, if I left anyone out of your group, please forward this on.

Thanks!!

Julie


<<Collateral Trust and Security Agr ver 1.doc>>

 I received Gerald's voice mail last night that El Paso cannot handle
an agency agreement wherein Enron would be our agent for the limited purpose
of exercising the recall right on only three of the capacity packages.
Although I find this disappointing, we obviously need to address this
development.

 We think the proper approach is to retain the firm recallable
release structure we developed.  That creates a present release into Enron's
hands of the contracts, which was Barry's stated desire.  We would retain a
recall right BUT we could only exercise it in accordance with the Support
Agreement (e.g., monthly, so long as not in default).  We understand that
you might want some further assurance that we would not misuse that right.
To that end, I have resuscitated the Collateral Trust and Security
Agreement.  In other words, we would give you a first priority lien on the
applicable transportation packages so that if we improperly recalled the
capacity (which we of course would not), you would still be the senior
secured party on the capacity and be entitled to exercise your remedies of
foreclosure.  Moreover, as Lisa and I discussed when we first considered the
security interest, this security interest would be exempted from the
automatic stay in accordance with Section 362(b)(17) of the Bankruptcy Code
and thus you would be in a position to exercise your lien notwithstanding
even the meltdown scenario of a bankruptcy.

 Please respond at youre earliest convenience.

 Peter

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

 - Collateral Trust and Security Agr ver 1.doc


Peter, the distribution list on this is different from the ESA deal (each
contract has a different list - isn't that special?)  I will forward it to
the correct people.  Lee Johnson and Kent Shoemaker get copies on all of them
from GE's side.

Thanks,

Kay


I have the distinct impression that you're glad this has been finalized....


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/20/2000 01:24 PM -----

	Yahoo! Finance <refertofriend@reply.yahoo.com>
	10/20/2000 11:54 AM
	Please respond to ldyer

		 To: jdasovic@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Yahoo! Finance Story - Yahoo - SDG&E files Calif. power market
reform proposals

Douglas L. Dyer (ldyer@enron.com) has sent you a news article
Personal message:
Yahoo - SDG&E files Calif. power market reform proposals
http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/001020/n20262785.html

	Home - Yahoo! - Help

[ Latest Headlines Market Overview | News Alerts ]

Related Quotes

EIX
PCG
SRE
20 7/8
27 3/4
20 3/8
-1/8
-7/16
+0

delayed 20 mins - disclaimer

Friday October 20, 11:18 am Eastern Time
SDG&E files Calif. power market reform proposals
SAN DIEGO, Oct 20 (Reuters) - San Diego Gas and Electric, the utility whose
customers faced a near tripling in their electricity bills this summer, filed
a plan with federal regulators on Friday designed to address some of the
problems with California's deregulated power market.
The utility, a unit of Sempra Energy (NYSE:SRE - news), filed a 17-point plan
that included a temporary price cap for wholesale power prices of $100 per
megawatt hour and a reorganization of the California Independent System
Operator (ISO), which operates most of the state's electricity grid.
``Despite the cooler weather and lower statewide demand we recently have been
experiencing, the high wholesale electric prices out customers have endured
this summer are not subsiding,'' said SDG&E chairman Edwin Guiles.
``We need federal regulators to take swift and immediate action in addressing
the fundamental structural defects in California's deregulated marketplace
that have contributed to electricity prices that we believe are neither just
nor reasonable,'' he added.
Earlier this week the state's two other investor- owned utilities, PG&E Corp
(NYSE:PCG - news) unit Pacific Gas and Electric and Edison International
(NYSE:EIX - news) subsidiary Southern California Edison also filed in support
of a $100 price cap along with consumer group, the Utility Reform Network
(TURN).
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is currently investigating
California's power market after prices soared to record levels this year.
There have been allegations that rates were not ``just and reasonable'' as
required under federal regulations.
The California ISO cut its cap on wholesale prices twice this year from an
initial $750 per MWh to a final $250 but drew criticism from some for not
cutting the cap faster.
The agency's board of governors includes representatives of a wide range of
organisations including independent power producers, who have made huge
profits this summer with prices soaring to record levels, as well as consumer
groups, investor owned utilities and municipal utilities.
SDG&E called for the removal of ``economically based stakeholders'' from the
board of governors and for also a reduction in its size.
``The current stakeholder board is to large to be effective and apparently
incapable of adopting the structural change necessary to support workable
competition,'' the utility said.
Customers of SDG&E were the first in the country to pay market-based prices
without a safety net under the terms of California's trailblazing power
market regulation.
State legislators intervened this year and imposed a price cap on SDG&E
retail rates after reports that pensioners were turning off their
refrigerators in a bid to avoid running up massive bills after rates tripled.
The state's power problems are rooted partly in increased loads linked to the
nation's booming economy, with Western states among those showing the fastest
growth.
There also have been few power plants built during the past 10 years, and
although many are now planned, the prolonged approval and construction
process means most will not come on line before 2002.
Email this story - View most popular stories emailed

More Quotes
and News:	Edison International (NYSE:EIX - news)
	PG&E Corp (NYSE:PCG - news)
	Sempra Energy (NYSE:SRE - news)
	Related News Categories: US Market News

Help

Copyright , 2000 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.Privacy Policy - Terms of
Service

Questions or Comments?


Hello! Keegan has just sent you a greeting card from Bluemountain.com.

You can pick up your personal message here:

http://www2.bluemountain.com/cards/boxb226945t4/zz8f5gxbu785zp.html

Your card will be available for the next 90 days.

This service is 100% FREE! :) Have a good day and have fun!

________________________________________________________________________
Accessing your card indicates agreement with Blue Mountain's Website Rules:
http://www.bluemountain.com/home/WebsiteRules.html

Send FREE Blue Mountain cards to friends and family (and attach gifts too!)
http://www.bluemountain.com


Mark:

I have confirmed Mal Finnen former General Counsel for the recently
disbanded PetroCosm and Brian Baird, in-house counsel for Pantellos as part
of this panel.

The request is still open for you or one of your staff to participate on
Thursday.........

Please advise if you're still interested......

If not, thank you for considering participation....

Bret

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Strong, Bret
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 3:51 PM
> To: 'mark.e.haedicke@enron.com'
> Cc: 'janette.elbertson@enron.com'
> Subject: FW: Request for Participation in Power Institute
>
> Mark:
>
> I don't  mean to be a bother, but have you had an opportunity to consider
> this???
>
> Please let me know when you get a chance.
>
> Bret
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Strong, Bret
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 1:29 PM
> To: 'mark.e.haedicke@enron.com'
> Cc: 'janette.elbertson@enron.com'
> Subject: Request for Participation in Power Institute
>
> Mr. Haedicke:
>
> Please let me apologize in advance for not providing this response earlier
> based on discussions with your assistant Ms. Elbertson.  I was trying to
> clarify needs for the Institute with other planning committee members, and
> then was involved in an unfortunate accident which has had be out of the
> office for a major portion of the last 2 weeks.
>
> As previously discussed through your assistant, we would be interested in
> your participation as a panelist in a discussion to take place as part of
> the Power Institute to take place on June 7 and 8, 2001 at South Texas
> College of Law (downtown Houston).  The segment I would like to solicit
> your participation in is entitled "E-Commerce in the New Energy World" at
> 1:00 PM - 1:45 PM which was originally structured as a "speech", but the
> planners would like to restructure as a round-table discussion including
> legal representatives from Pantellos (confirmed), the newly-defunct
> Petrocosm and yourself (Enron On-line).  The panel would be moderated with
> some "canned questions" that we'd give you ahead of time, and some time
> for questions and answers from the audience.  There would be little
> preparation other than sharing your experiences.  I've faxed the brochure
> to 713-646-2600 for your review.
>
> If you are unavailable, we would welcome one of your attorneys from your
> staff.  It's a great opportunity to "sell" Enron On-Line to a captive
> audience of industry participants.
>
> Please let me know at your earliest convenience.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bret
>
> Bret L. Strong
> Winstead Sechrest & Minick
> The Woodlands, TX 77381
> 281-367-2222


you wrer the one that got nasty

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 12:52 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

why are you being mean?


Please find attached our proposed Second Amendment, which would replace the
current form of collateral annex attached to the ISDA Master Agreement we
have in place with an ISDA Credit Support Annex and Paragraph 13 thereto.  If
you have any questions or comments concerning the form please call me at
(713) 853-3399 or Sara Shackleton, Senior Counsel, at (713) 853-5620.  Tanya
Rohauer in our Credit Dept. can handle any credit questions you have.  Her
number is (713) 853-3263.  Thanks for your prompt attention to this.


Enron is the...

v Most Innovative Company in America -  Five Consecutive Years
v Number One Energy/Commodity House - 2000
v Top Company for Quality of Management -  2000
v Second Best Company for Employee Talent -  2000

and the

v Number One BEST Place to Work in America  -  2001
Wouldn,t this be GREAT!

Yesterday, 250 of Fortune,s "100 Best Companies to Work for in America"
surveys were mailed to randomly selected U.S.-based employees.  Please check
your home mailbox to see if you were selected to participate in the survey.

Enron,s goal is to be in the Top 10 on Fortune,s list, up from our current
rank of No. 24 on this prestigious list.  The feedback you provide in the
survey is a key element in the evaluation process.  Your honest and open
responses, as well as written comments about your personal Enron experiences,
will help Enron achieve this goal.

Thanks for all you do everyday to make Enron the best place to work.


Have a safe and Happy Thanksgiving!


Start Date: 1/7/02; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010702.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred: 339.57 / Final: 339.54)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 1/7/02
  SC_ID: ENRJ


1.  SDG&E
   2.  Emergency Motions/Proposed Strategy

From: Sandra McCubbin on 11/01/2000 11:49 AM PST
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Staff Meeting Reminder & Agenda Items Request

will be flying to LA for meeting with Rod Wright


[IMAGE]   Now you can have  DVD quality in your home by paying only a fraction of the retail  DVD price!      As a special offer  to our users, Columbia House is offering you 4 dvd's for  only 49 cents each (plus shipping and handling)!    Choose from new  releases! Old classics! And all those in between!    * Traffic * Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon * Gladiator * And more!     Join now to choose your DVDs!   Click here if you no longer want to receive gifts and special offers from Send 4 Fun.


----- Forwarded by Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron on 03/02/2001 11:56 AM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	03/01/2001 05:17 PM

		 To: Karen Denne <kdenne@enron.com>
		 cc: Sandra McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>
		 Subject: [Fwd: Direct Access Coalition Media Plan]

Karen,

I just wanted you to be aware of Edelman's activities on direct access.

Scott

Received: (qmail 77871 invoked by uid 41); 28 Feb 2001 04:07:03 -0000
Received: from nycxims1.edelman.com (63.96.56.110)  by mx7.quiknet.com with
SMTP; 28 Feb 2001 04:07:03 -0000
Received: by nycxims1.edelman.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<FY7A0FGF>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:46:37 -0500
Message-ID: <F1011D165600D411AC5400D0B720EE10A621F8@SFOXMB1>
From: "Fairchild, Tracy" <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>
To: dhunter@smithandkempton.com, brbarkovich@earthlink.net,
wbooth@booth-law.com, drothrock@cmta.net, jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com,
kmills@cfbf.com, kmccrea@sablaw.com, mday@gmssr.com,  nplotkin@tfglobby.com,
spahnn@hnks.com, wlarson@calstate.edu,  vincent.stewart@ucop.edu,
gharrison@calstate.edu, sgovenar@govadv.com,  hgovenar@govadv.com,
smccubbi@enron.com, lhastings@cagrocers.com,  theo@ppallc.com,
cra@calretailers.com, mmoretti@calhealth.org,  wbrown@lhom.com,
randy_britt@robinsonsmay.com, "DiMare, Dominic"
<Dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>, vjw@ceert.org, rcavanagh@nrdc.org,
rochmanm@spurr-remac.org, rrichter@calhealth.org, ken_pietrelli@ocli.com,
dennis.flatt@kp.org, richard.seguin@kp.org, arm@phaser.com,
djsmith@smithandkempton.com, "Fairchild, Tracy"
<tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>, "Allen, Stevan"  <stevan.allen@edelman.com>,
"Beiser, Megan" <Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>,  "Manuel, Erica"
<Erica.Manuel@edelman.com>, "Warner, Jami"  <jami.warner@edelman.com>
Subject: Direct Access Coalition Media Plan
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:46:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C0A139.07D39B10"
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

Hello to the Direct Access Coalition:

Below you will find a summary of the press strategy that Edelman Public
Relations intends to employ over the coming weeks in collaboration with the
Alliance for Retail Energy Markets and the broader Direct Access Coalition.
I will also outline the information that I need from Direct Access Coalition
members who are willing to be involved in media outreach and interviews.
And finally, I have attached supporting documents that you can use as
background material to prep for your responses to any media inquiries that
you may receive.

This Week

1.   We are drafting a "pitch letter" to send out by the end of this week
via blast e-mail and fax to the following media lists: 1)capitol press corps
reporters; 2) mainstream media reporters working the energy crisis; and 3)
trade media.  We may also outreach to our editorial board list as well.  Our
pitch will be focused on what it will really mean for small business and C&I
customers to lose the option of retail choice at a time when they are
suffering the financial hardships of skyrocketing energy bills. We will
address the effect on California's future business climate if direct access
is not preserved through legislation that corrects the problems that AB1x
caused for retail choice.  And finally, we will address the point that no
matter what direction California ultimately takes, direct access must be a
part of the solution.  Reporters have seen the recent polls which illustrate
California businesses' concerns with the path the state is on so this is a
prime opportunity to build on those recent media stories.

2.    We recommend a conference call with AReM and the Direct Access
Coalition on Friday to address the questions and suggestions on the press
strategy outlined here.

3.     Determine which people in the Direct Access Coalition are willing to
take media calls on behalf of the coalition.

Next Week

1.   Follow up with key reporters who received the pitch letter.

2.   Evaluate the language of SB 27x and determine whether there will be an
opportunity to hold a news conference with Sen. Bowen in the near future.
Monitor movement at the PUC and determine whether a press conference may be
effective in this arena, or whether we may need to use the option of sending
a media alert before the March 7 hearing, followed by a news release after
the hearing.

3.   Place op-eds (opinion pieces) with key newspapers.

4.   Contact radio news shows and TV public affairs shows (i.e. California
Capitol Week and the California Report) to secure
media interviews.

5.    Revise the SB 27x fact sheet (attached) to reflect the realities of
the amended language in SB 27x.

 What We Need From You

1.  If you are willing to speak with the media, or you have
customers/clients with a positive direct access story to tell, please
respond to this email as soon as you can with your name and contact
information.

2.  If you have draft op-eds written that need to be placed with newspapers
on behalf of your association and the broader coalition, we are willing to
do this for the you.

3.  If you have colleagues and/or staff that are already working with the
media it would be helpful to have this information so that we can
collaborate as necessary.

The Documents Below
>  All documents are works in progress, so if you have suggestions on
> potential changes, please feel free to share them with us.
>

Thank you.

>  <<AREM Fact Sheet 2212001 ver 2272001.doc>>
>  <<Q&A @ ESP Reversions 22701.doc>>  <<AReM FAQ FINAL3.doc>>  <<AREM Fact
> FINAL3.doc>>
>
> Tracy Fairchild
> Account Supervisor
> Edelman Public Relations Worldwide
> (916) 442-2331
> tracy.fairchild@edelman.com
>

 - AREM Fact Sheet 2212001 ver 2272001.doc
 - Q&A @ ESP Reversions 22701.doc
 - AReM FAQ FINAL3.doc
 - AREM Fact FINAL3.doc


If you would like, the team will be prepared to show live demonstrations of
the latest versions of all four CommodityLogic modules next Thursday,
December 21st.  This would probably require about 2 hours.  The versions
displayed will be:

Financial Management Module 2.0
Financial Invoice Exchange 1.1
Confirm Central 1.0
Contract Exchange 1.0

Please let us know if you are interested in attending.

All the best,

Tom


Joanne,

That would be fine.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rozycki, Joanne
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:19 PM
To:	Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Subject:	We have tentatively blocked Nov 1, Thurs from 9 to 10 am for your meeting with Mark Breese's group

We need to let Melissa Solis know if you have any requirements (projector, laptop, video-taping) etc.

Joanne Rozycki
Senior Administrative Assistant
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3880D
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-5968     Fax:      (713) 646-3490
Email:   joanne.rozycki@enron.com


Mark,

I am looking into this.

Rabi

Mark Fisher
04/23/2002 08:15 AM
To: Rabi Sahoo/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Patricia Hunter/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: StatServer Administration

Hi Rabi,

I am developing a StatServer Analytic, but it keeps timing out (at about 300
seconds/5 minutes). In the page I am using I have tried increasing the time
but it has no effect, so could you find out if there is a setting on the
server (IIS script timeout) and see about increasing the value?

Mark Fisher


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000 05:33
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tobin Carlson                           03/01/2000 10:01 AM

To: Gary Stadler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan M
Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Aggie Wedding

This is a great.

Tobin

  <<wedding.gif>>

 - wedding.gif


Attached is the ETS Facility Planning weekly report for the week ending Thursday October 25, 2001.

Please call with any questions or distribution list requests.

-Morgan Gottsponer


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lokay, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, March 22, 2002 10:23 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	Bullets 03/22/02

TW sold a total of 229,023 MMBtu/day of operational line pack at an average rate of $3.197/MMBtu.  The sales were to Astra Power.
Finalized OBA reconciliations with Mojave Pipeline.  Agreement to pay back physically 10,000 MMBtu/day for the remainder of this month with cash out for balance at the March Bloomberg index.  The physical gas is being sold daily and have already generated an additional $72,700.
New dollar-valued OBA, containing monthly cash out provision, with Burlington is executed.

Michelle Lokay
Account Director
Transwestern Commercial Group
713-345-7932


waiting for Mike to come back from off-site meeting - out of curiosity,
537949 is a light load deal - is that it?

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/05/2001 02:36 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: natsource

537948

broker has light load


Hello Deborah:

I would like to introduce myself and Anita Dupont to you as we will probably
be working together quite a bit between now and our move.  Please feel
free to contact either one of us regarding any questions or needs you
may have.

Headcount
The Executive, VP and Director headcount for the Research group is:
Managing Director  1
Vice Presidents   6
Directors   5

Also, Anita and I would like to invite you to meet with us and go over our
library space requirements.  Please let me know when you have some
free time and we will be available.

My number is: 3-5290 - EB1961
Anita's # is: 3-0329 - EB1969

I look forward to meeting you,

Shirley Crenshaw
Administrative Coordinator
Enron Research Group
3-5290


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/20/2000 06:30
PM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
12/20/2000 06:22 PM
To: Randy Petersen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Intergen transaction - DASH

Randy:

Based upon our discussions with Intergen this afternoon, there is a desire of
both Enron and Intergen to execute the transaction documents tomorrow
afternoon.  I need to determine if RAC believes that the 11/30/00 [Coral
Energy] DASH is sufficient for the transaction signing to proceed tomorrow or
if a revised DASH needs to be prepared and circulated for re-approval.

Relative to the approved 11/30 DASH, the major changes in the deal structure
are as follows:

1.  At the request of Coral Energy, the counterparty to the proposed
transaction has changed from Coral Energy to Intergen (or its designated
affiliate, Sweetgum Energy L.P.).

2.  Intergen has requested, and Enron has agreed, to the removal of the
requirement for an Intergen Parent Guarantee.  The major risk (i.e.
non-payment risk) associated with the removal of this Guarantee has been
mitigated by requiring Intergen to fund an escrow account with the
transaction sales proceeds prior to Enron's execution of the equipment
Assigment Agreement.

3.  Intergen has requested, and Enron has agreed, to the insertion of a
"no-shop" clause which serves to prevent Enron from offering/soliciting the
turbines & transformers to other parties once Intergen has signed the Letter
Agreement(s).

4.  Enron has requested, and Intergen has not yet agreed, to the modification
of the transaction "sunset dates".  These are the dates by which, once the
Letter Agreement is signed, that Enron must deliver the required Facilities
Agreements, GE acknowledgement letter, and fully executed Assignment
Agreement.  This modification proposes that the dates be moved from 12/29/00
to 1/15/01.  The Enron commercial deal team is awaiting confirmation from
Enron Global Finance that the executed Assignment Agreement can be delivered
within these timeframes.

5.  Intergen has requested, and Enron has agreed, to a modification of the
Transferability section of the Agreement in order to address an equipment
warranty risk that the current language represents to Intergen.  The
modification would serve to limit Enron's ability to exercise its "put
option" on its 20% member interest in the turbine/transformer L.L.C.(s) by
requiring either: 1) the expiration of the GE warranty, or 2) the written
consent of GE to Enron's ownership transfer in a form acceptable to Intergen.
 This modification is acceptable to Enron as it represents an earlier
potential put option exercise date under scenario 1) above than the current
Agreement language.

Please review this information and let me know (via email) if RAC requires
the DASH to be revised and re-approved.

Call me to discuss.

Fred
x35406


Angela - tasks

1.  Ask Iris how fast she can get more clocks, I would like to send some to
my brokers.  Also get me a list of who our marketers are sending gifts to.

2.  Tell Milly I'm requesting 3000 for the Order of Good Cheer and that I
will make a 1000 dollar donation personally that I will not as Enron to match.

3.


Here is the redline of changes to the Enfolio made in August, 1999.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                NOVEMBER 26, 2001

Notice ID: 3291
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT:  TCO CAPACITY UPDATE EFFECTIVE FOR TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2001

                 CHANGES ARE INDICATED WITH AN *

Effective Tuesday, November 27, 2001, capacities will be as follows:

Excess MDWQ              Available +
ISS Withdrawals          Available
SIT Withdrawals          Available
Imbalance Drawdowns      Available

Excess MDIQ              NOT Available +
ISS Injections           NOT Available
SIT Injections           NOT Available
Imbalance Paybacks       NOT Available

PAL Lends/Unparks        Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks  NOT Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Non-firm receipt capacity will be as follows:

TENNESSEE:

Brinker (B12)            20,000
Broad Run (B9)          450,000
Cambridge (B10)               0
Dungannon (B11)          20,000
Highland (B17)                0
Milford (B18)            20,000
North Greenwood (B22)         0
Unionville (B15)         50,000

TEXAS EASTERN:

Delmont (C16)            10,000
Eagle (C22)              20,000
Hooker (C9)              20,000
Pennsburg (C23)          20,000
Windridge (C12)          20,000

NATIONAL FUEL:

Independence (M1)             0
Ellwood City (L1)        15,000

TRANSCO:

Downingtown (E3)          2,500
Emporia I (E13)          60,000
Rockville (E2)           60,000
Dranesville (E1)         50,000

CNR PIPELINE:

Wiser (827280)                0

DELTA:

Delta Natural Gas (819288)    0

ALGONQUIN:

Ramapo (R1)              25,000

ANR:

Paulding/Cecil           30,000
(F1, A2)

LEBANON AGGREGATE       100,000
(A4, F2, C4, D3)

TOLEDO AGGREGATE        100,000
(A3, F4, 734462)

COLUMBIA GULF:
(801)

TCO-Leach               700,000

Internal point non-firm capacity will be as follows:

Lanham                        0

Delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

TRANSCO:

Martins Creek            10,000
  (MLI E5)
Young Woman's Creek      10,000
  (MLI E9)

ALGONQUIN:

Hanover                       0
  (MLI R2)

EQUITRANS:

Fallen Timber            31,000
  (MLI K1)

Waynesburg-Rhinehart     20,000
  (MLI K2)

OPT-30 will be available in all market areas.
OPT-60 will be available in all market areas.

Market Area delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

Operating Area 1
     Market Area 33       No Restrictions *
     Market Area 34       No Restrictions *

Operating Area 2
     Market Area 20       No Restrictions

Operating Area 3
     Market Area 15       No Restrictions
     Market Area 16       No Restrictions
     Market Area 17       No Restrictions
     Market Area 18       No Restrictions
     Market Area 19       No Restrictions

Operating Area 4
     Market Area 21       No Restrictions *
     Market Area 22       No Restrictions *
     Market Area 23       No Restrictions *
     Market Area 24       No Restrictions *
     Market Area 25       No Restrictions
     Market Area 29       No Restrictions

Operating Area 5
     Market Area 02       No Restrictions
     Market Area 07       No Restrictions

Operating Area 6
     Market Area 10       No Restrictions
     Market Area 11       No Restrictions
     Market Area 12       No Restrictions
     Market Area 13       No Restrictions
     Market Area 14       No Restrictions

Operating Area 7
     Market Area 01       No Restrictions
     Market Area 03       No Restrictions
     Market Area 04       No Restrictions
     Market Area 05       No Restrictions
     Market Area 06       No Restrictions
     Market Area 08       No Restrictions
     Market Area 09       No Restrictions

Operating Area 8
     Market Area 26       No Restrictions
     Market Area 27       No Restrictions
     Market Area 32       No Restrictions
     Market Area 35       No Restrictions
     Market Area 36       No restrictions for southern part of Market Area 36.
                          Primary receipts/deliveries only for gas delivered
                          in the northern portion of Market Area 36.
     Market Area 38       No Restrictions
     Market Area 39       No Restrictions
     Market Area 40       No Restrictions

NOTE:  GAS DELIVERED IN THE NORTHERN PORTION OF MARKET AREA 38 OR THE NORTHERN
PORTION OF MARKET AREA 36 MUST BE RECEIVED FROM TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE AT
HIGHLAND.

Operating Area 10
     Market Area 28       No Restrictions
     Market Area 30       No Restrictions
     Market Area 31       No Restrictions

If you have any questions, please contact your Account
Representative.


We have a 5,000 day purchase from Bay State that we can take at CNG/Trco
Leidy or at CNG South pool meter 10002.  The deal number is 418282.  Could we
put this deal number on the CNG and/or Trco sheet?
We currently have this deal baseloaded to CNG South Pool.  We need to call
Bay State if we move it.

My contact at Bay State is Stacey Djukic 219-853-4320.  I gave Stacey Angie's
number as a contact.  If we can't get in touch with Stacey, then talk to
Robin.


Dear Colleagues,

We look forward to the first meeting of The Electricity Restructuring
Advisory Board.  The meeting will be held in Montreal, January 16, 2001
(commencing at 8:30 am), at the Commission for Environmental Cooperation
(CEC), 393 St-Jacques Street West, Suite 200.

The CEC will cover all travel expenses along with accommodations and per
diem. Kindly complete the attached "Confirmation of Participation" form and
return it to Leticia Villeneuve by Dec. 18, 2000 (lvillene@ccemtl.org or fax
514-350-4345) so that we can arrange your travel plans. Since the holidays
are almost here, please note that after this Dec 18 deadline, we ask that you
arrange your own travel/hotel and the CEC will reimburse you (for an economy
priced ticket).

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or
concerns.

Thank you,
Yolanda Clegg

Yolanda Clegg, M.Sc.
Environment, Economy and Trade Program
North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation
393 rue St-Jacques Ouest, bureau 200
Montreal
Quebec
CANADA         H2Y 1N9

tel: 514-350-4368
fax: 514-350-4314
yolanda@ccemtl.org

http://www.cec.org

 - Confirmation-english.doc
 - Confirmation - Spanish.doc


see the attached spreadsheet.  respond with "enable macros" at the first
dialogue box and "no" to the second dialogue box.  go to the tab "peak by
region" and look at cell k15.  i have the print range set up already to print
peak, off-peak, and flat positions.


I noticed the memo too, and looked around this morning for the attachments
that went with them, but couldn't find them.  When Mark calls in I'll ask him
what happened to the attachments.


Some of you had a meeting with Stan on your calendars for Monday, October 22 from 3-5 to go over the plan presentations.  This meeting has been canceled.

Thanks

Tracy Geaccone


Will you be filling out mine?

From: Elizabeth Linnell on 06/12/2001 12:53 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Aleck
Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Marc
Phillips/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Henry Van/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt,
Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Worthen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Dennis Vegas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kelly Kimberly@Enron
Communications, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: 2002 Budgets - Here we go! with attachment

Sorry!

----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 06/12/2001 12:52 PM -----

	Elizabeth Linnell
	06/12/2001 12:51 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Aleck
Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Marc
Phillips/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Henry Van/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt,
Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Worthen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Dennis Vegas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kelly Kimberly@Enron
Communications, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: 2002 Budgets - Here we go!

Here comes the project we've all been waiting for!  Attached below is the
headcount worksheet for the 2002 budget.  This data will be used to determine
benefits amounts/percentages and insurance coverage.  Note that there are
four pages in the workbook to be filled out.

Please return the spreadsheets to me by June 21st.  If you need any help or
have any questions, I'm available at 713-853-3896.

Thanks!


I don't know, probably 5.  But if you're leaving earlier, I can walk down with you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:19 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

ok what time are you leaving

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:18 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

Okay, I do need to get my pager today


I've asked GE for the LOC by Wednesday, but I haven't gotten a response.

I'll have difficulty getting executed docs by Tuesday, since sigs are coming
from Portland.  I'll have to check to see what can be done.

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/30/2001 10:02:44 AM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Delta Documents

Kay:

Can you get executed documents back to me on Tuesday?  Greg has requested
that we send the original membership certificate representing the 80%
interest to the collateral agent Tuesday night by overnight delivery to hold
in escrow until closing, in order that the collateral agent is in possession
of the certificate (for purposes of legal opinions) upon closing on
Wednesday.  Greg is planning to fax signature pages of all of their closing
documents later today.  (I will be out of the office at a meeting with
another client most of the afternoon today).

There is one last question with GE dealing with the letter of credit for the
retention amount, as this affects our disbursement instruction letter.  I
advised Greg that GE's normal practice was to send the retention L/C after
receipt of payment.  He is considering this, but may want to talk to GE
about the ability to present the L/C at closing.  Do you have any thoughts
on this?

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Attached is the revised New Power FOM volumes for November.  CMD 8-32
increased by 1 mmbtu and AGL (Sonat and Transco) decreased by 3,000 mmbtu.

Let me know if you have any questions.

David


Isabel,

Unless I'm missing something, two of these documents are the same (93), and
we are missing the no objections to forms letter.

Kay

"PARKER, Isabel" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com> on 04/25/2001 01:29:57 AM
To: "Carolyn Campbell (E-mail)" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)"
<kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)" <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>, "Rick Vicens
(E-mail)" <rvicens@deltapower.com>, "John Tisdale (E-mail)"
<jtisdale@arclightcapital.com>, "Amy Weed (E-mail)" <aweed@jhancock.com>,
"John Anderson (E-mail)" <jcsanderson@jhancock.com>, "BURKE, Ted (TDB)"
<ted.burke@freshfields.com>

Subject: Pegasus - ENA documents

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.  Thank you for
your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

We attached clean and blacklined copies of the ENA Consent and Agreement,
the ENA no objection to forms letter and the Hancock entitlement letter,
marked to show minor changes from the versions last circulated.

We would be grateful for your confirmation that these are in final form.

Kind regards
Isabel

 - COMPARE003.DOC
 - NY003699617.DOC
 - COMPARE002.DOC
 - NY003701393.DOC
 - COMPARE002.DOC
 - NY003701393.DOC


Take a look at deal 168996.  I took the expected volumes to 0.  This goes
with deal 643761.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/27/2001 04:23
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Germany                           02/27/2001 12:57 PM

To: Kimat Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Wood/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: New Power deals

Effective March 1st, I moved the volumes on deal 377268 (Non NY sale to New
Power) to deal 643754 (sale to New Power at WGL on CGAS).  Please correct the
hedge information.

I also created deal 643761 (sale to New Power at WGL on CGAS).  I believe
this deal is in the index book but does not show up in Sitara.  I believe it
was originally a Z6 Non Ny sale to New Power also.

Let me know if you have any questions.

thanks


Dear Kate,

Thanks for your response.  It appears that we sent EES the wrong prices in
the spreadsheet that we sent to them.  Bill said he would make the changes,
so I won't bring this over to you (not yet anyway).   I also told Mark in
Houston what is happening, so this will hopefully be done.

Thanks for your help.

Virginia

   Kate Symes                03/13/2001 10:09 AM

To: Virginia Thompson/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: EES Changes for March

Yes, that's fine if you bring the discrepancies by later. Or I can swing by
your desk to get them. I think I know why Mark is confused about the price.
At the beginning of this month we started running into situations where we
had to purchase from EES in addition to selling to them - which is all we had
been doing to cover their load before. We determined, however, that when EPMI
buys from EES, the price should be $5 less than our fixed price average for
the day. (When EPMI sells to EES, the price is $5 more than the fixed price
average.) In this way, we're still making our profit from the coverage of
their load. Either the correct price is not reflected in the spreadsheet we
sent them, or we purchased at the wrong price - we were working the kinks out
right at the beginning of March, so it makes sense that they'd have questions
regarding that time frame.

Also, I've already talked with Daniel Kang at EES to work out some
discrepancies with him. He asked about volumes at the beginning of March, but
didn't seem to have a question about price, so I'm wondering if everyone over
there is communicating with each other. Please let me know what I can do to
resolve this - and feel free to send Mark my way when he has questions.

Kate


I leave this sunday...so i am just here for a few more days. Gone next week. You can call me after 2pm at work if you want.....713-853-1917.  Otherwise on my cell in the evenings.  I am usually in bed by 10 so I shut my phone off.  Later - mo

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Joseph.F.Reid@accenture.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Joseph+2EF+2EReid+40accenture+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:12 AM
To:	Sanchez, Monique
Subject:	RE: yes...i live

I can't believe the amount of travel you fit into your schedule...i am
impressed.  I'll try calling you next week before you go.

joe

Joseph F. Reid
Accenture
617-454-8636 W
617-515-7679 C

            Monique.Sanchez@enron.c
            om                             To:     IMCEANOTES-Joseph+2EF+2EReid+40accenture+2Ecom+40ENRON@enron.com
                                           cc:
            06/07/2001 11:52 AM            Subject:     RE: yes...i live

Hey there,
I am actually off to Alaska on sunday with john and am gone until the
20th...so maybe you can call me before then.  Take care,
Mo

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Joseph.F.Reid@accenture.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Joseph+2EF+2EReid+40accenture+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Thursday, June 07, 2001 10:49 AM
   To:     Sanchez, Monique
   Subject:  yes...i live

   Monique,

   Sorry I haven't gotten back to you before now and I truly wish we
   could've
   gotten together over Memorial Day.  I was only in town a couple of days
   and
   then off to San Antonio so we just missed each other again.  Go a lot to
   catch up on and I am going to be tenacious in my attempts to get a hold
   of
   you...let me know when you have time to talk.  I am out this weekend but
   maybe tonight or next week, we can chat.  Let me know.

   Take care and stay safe.

   joe
   This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
   privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in
   error,
   please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
   use of the email by you is prohibited.

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.


Reservation status has changed. Details of the reservation are listed below:
ASSIGNMENT_REF = 27904
SELLER_CODE = AZPS
SELLER_DUNS = 958982563
CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI
CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276
AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0
PATH_NAME = W/AZPS/AZPS-AZPS/FOURCORNE345 - PNPKAPS230//
POINT_OF_RECEIPT = FOURCORNE345
POINT_OF_DELIVERY = PNPKAPS230
SOURCE = presched
SINK = presched
CAPACITY = 0
CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 25
SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY
TS_CLASS = FIRM
TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT
TS_PERIOD = OFF_PEAK
TS_WINDOW = FIXED
TS_SUBCLASS = WHEEL
NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1
OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default
START_TIME = 01/13/2002
STOP_TIME = 01/15/2002
CEILING_PRICE = 1.95
OFFER_PRICE = 1.95
BID_PRICE = 1.95
PRICE_UNITS = $/mW
PRECONFIRMED = YES
ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A
ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A
POSTING_REF = 0
SALE_REF =
REQUEST_REF =
DEAL_REF =
NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG =
STATUS = STUDY
STATUS_NOTIFICATION = holden.salisbury@enron.com
STATUS_COMMENTS =
TIME_QUEUED = 01/11/2002

TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 01/11/2002
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_COMMENTS =
CUSTOMER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_NAME = AZPS
SELLER_PHONE = 602.250.1128
SELLER_FAX = 602.250.1155
SELLER_EMAIL = oasisadm@apsc.com
CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801
CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272
CUSTOMER_EMAIL = bill.rust@enron.com
REASSIGNED_REF = 0
REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0


The net beneficiary of Lay's decision is Dynegy. Why wouldnt he give it to the employees vs. forfeiture??? I just dont get it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ken Lay - Office of the Chairman
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 5:18 PM
To:	DL-GA-all_enron_worldwide2
Subject:	Change of Control Provisions

As many of you know, I have a provision in my employment contract which provides for a payment of $20 million per year for the remaining term of my contract in the event of a change of control of Enron.  The merger with Dynegy, or a similar transaction with any other company, would trigger this provision on closing.  Assuming the merger with Dynegy is closed within 6-9 months, as we expect, this provision would entitle me to total payments of slightly more than $60 million.

Many CEOs have change of control provisions in their employment contracts and mine has been in place since 1989.  But given the current circumstances facing the company and our employees, I have been giving a lot of thought these last few days to what to do about this payment.  Initially, I thought I would use part of the funds for a foundation for our employees and take the remainder in stock and cash.  However, after talking to a number of employees this afternoon, I have decided that the best course of action would be for me to waive my right to any of this payment.  Therefore, at closing, I will receive no payments under this provision.

I know this action does not remedy the uncertainty that you and your families face.  But please know that I will continue to do everything in my power to serve the best interests of Enron's employees and shareholders.  I am still very proud of what we have built at Enron, and I want to continue working with all of you to correct the problems and restore Enron to its rightful place in the energy industry.

Thank you.


Start Date: 4/13/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Hi guys,

Could someone send an electronic file of the execution copy of the Coyote
Springs contract?

Thank you,

Kay


Everett,  congrats!
mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 08/16/2000
12:47 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin Hannon & Rick Causey @ ENRON
08/15/2000 06:11 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Organizational Announcement

To help accomplish our business goals, the following management appointments
are effective immediately:

Tod Lindholm, previously Managing Director - Chief Accounting Officer for
EBS, will move to Corporate as Managing Director and assume responsibility
for Business Risk Management, IT Compliance as well as working on a number of
special assignments for Rick Causey, Executive Vice President - Chief
Accounting Officer for Enron Corp.

John Echols, currently Managing Director - Risk Systems Development for EBS
will assume responsibility for accounting and administration for EBS  as well
as his current responsibilities and will report to the Office of the Chairman
for EBS.

Everett Plante, currently Vice President - Chief Information Officer for EBS
will now  report directly to the Office of the Chairman for EBS.


When El Paso gets exercised for replacement  reserves by the CAISO and they
play the 10 minute ramping games.  Don't call EPE to ramp down their
generation, if possible run an imbalance and receive the dec prices.  I have
cleared this with EPE and John Forney.  If something happens to change this
situation drop me a line.

Paul


Please plan to attend a meeting Friday, December 1, 2000 at 7:00 am in
Conference Room 3321.

 Date:  Friday
   December 1, 2000

 Time:  7:00 am

 Location: Conf Room 3321

 Topic:  Review of Tex-Mex Deal for Board Approval

If you will be travelling and need to call in, please let me and I will set
up a dial-in number.

Feel free to call me with any questions.

Thanks,

Kay 3-0643


Ben
Let us setup a time on Tuesday to do final review/corrections to the model
before submission to RAC.  How about sometime after noon?  Let me know your
availability.  Thanks and have a good Labor Day.


Thank you for subscribing to the Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air Web
Specials Announcement Service.

Web Specials are a great way to save on flights with Alaska Airlines and
Horizon Air. Web Specials can only be purchased online through the Alaska
Airlines/Horizon Air Web Site.

Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air offer Web Specials for travel originating
Wednesday, 01/10/01 or Thursday, 01/11/01 or Saturday, 01/13/01, and
returning Saturday, 01/13/01 or Monday, 01/15/01 or Tuesday, 01/16/01.

Hurry, seats are limited, prices and markets subject to change.

The current specials are shown below (all fares quoted in US dollars)
without airport fees and segment tax:

Roundtrip Coach fares for travel between:

Anchorage, AK         -     Fresno, CA            -     $449.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Redding, CA           -     $459.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Seattle, WA           -     $299.00
Barrow, AK            -     Fairbanks, AK         -     $279.00
Bellingham, WA        -     Juneau, AK            -     $269.00
Bellingham, WA        -     Ketchikan, AK         -     $299.00
Bellingham, WA        -     Orange County, CA     -     $259.00
Bellingham, WA        -     Reno, NV              -     $179.00
Bellingham, WA        -     San Francisco, CA     -     $179.00
Bellingham, WA        -     Seattle, WA           -      $59.00
Boise, ID             -     San Jose, CA          -      $99.00
Burbank, CA           -     Redmond, OR           -     $229.00
Cordova, AK           -     Yakutat, AK           -     $119.00
Eugene, OR            -     Los Angeles, CA       -     $109.00
Eureka, CA            -     Portland, OR          -      $99.00
Eureka, CA            -     Redding, CA           -      $69.00
Eureka, CA            -     Seattle, WA           -      $99.00
Eureka, CA            -     Spokane, WA           -     $189.00
Fairbanks, AK         -     Barrow, AK            -     $279.00
Fresno, CA            -     Anchorage, AK         -     $449.00
Fresno, CA            -     Juneau, AK            -     $359.00
Fresno, CA            -     Seattle, WA           -     $149.00
Fresno, CA            -     Spokane, WA           -     $199.00
Great Falls, MT       -     Ketchikan, AK         -     $419.00
Great Falls, MT       -     Oakland, CA           -     $199.00
Great Falls, MT       -     Ontario, CA           -     $279.00
Great Falls, MT       -     San Diego, CA         -     $239.00
Great Falls, MT       -     Seattle, WA           -     $109.00
Juneau, AK            -     Bellingham, WA        -     $269.00
Juneau, AK            -     Fresno, CA            -     $359.00
Juneau, AK            -     Medford, OR           -     $319.00
Juneau, AK            -     Portland, OR          -     $259.00
Ketchikan, AK         -     Bellingham, WA        -     $299.00
Ketchikan, AK         -     Great Falls, MT       -     $419.00
Ketchikan, AK         -     Redding, CA           -     $399.00
Ketchikan, AK         -     Seattle, WA           -     $269.00
Los Angeles, CA       -     Eugene, OR            -     $109.00
Los Angeles, CA       -     Portland, OR          -     $189.00
Los Angeles, CA       -     Vancouver, BC         -     $229.00
Medford, OR           -     Juneau, AK            -     $319.00
Medford, OR           -     Orange County, CA     -     $259.00
Medford, OR           -     Phoenix, AZ           -     $259.00
Medford, OR           -     Sacramento, CA        -     $159.00
Medford, OR           -     Seattle, WA           -      $99.00
North Bend, OR        -     Ontario, CA           -     $259.00
North Bend, OR        -     Portland, OR          -      $69.00
Oakland, CA           -     Great Falls, MT       -     $199.00
Ontario, CA           -     Great Falls, MT       -     $279.00
Ontario, CA           -     North Bend, OR        -     $259.00
Orange County, CA     -     Bellingham, WA        -     $259.00
Orange County, CA     -     Medford, OR           -     $259.00
Phoenix, AZ           -     Medford, OR           -     $259.00
Phoenix, AZ           -     Portland, OR          -     $189.00
Portland, OR          -     Eureka, CA            -      $99.00
Portland, OR          -     Juneau, AK            -     $259.00
Portland, OR          -     Los Angeles, CA       -     $189.00
Portland, OR          -     North Bend, OR        -      $69.00
Portland, OR          -     Phoenix, AZ           -     $189.00
Portland, OR          -     Redding, CA           -      $99.00
Portland, OR          -     Redmond, OR           -      $79.00
Portland, OR          -     San Jose, CA          -     $109.00
Portland, OR          -     Vancouver, BC         -      $73.00
Redding, CA           -     Anchorage, AK         -     $459.00
Redding, CA           -     Eureka, CA            -      $69.00
Redding, CA           -     Ketchikan, AK         -     $399.00
Redding, CA           -     Portland, OR          -      $99.00
Redding, CA           -     Seattle, WA           -      $99.00
Redding, CA           -     Spokane, WA           -     $189.00
Redmond, OR           -     Burbank, CA           -     $229.00
Redmond, OR           -     Portland, OR          -      $79.00
Redmond, OR           -     San Jose, CA          -     $159.00
Redmond, OR           -     Seattle, WA           -      $79.00
Redmond, OR           -     Tucson, AZ            -     $269.00
Reno, NV              -     Bellingham, WA        -     $179.00
Sacramento, CA        -     Medford, OR           -     $159.00
Sacramento, CA        -     Seattle, WA           -     $119.00
San Diego, CA         -     Great Falls, MT       -     $239.00
San Diego, CA         -     Seattle, WA           -     $189.00
San Francisco, CA     -     Bellingham, WA        -     $179.00
San Francisco, CA     -     Vancouver, BC         -     $179.00
San Jose, CA          -     Boise, ID             -      $99.00
San Jose, CA          -     Portland, OR          -     $109.00
San Jose, CA          -     Redmond, OR           -     $159.00
Seattle, WA           -     Anchorage, AK         -     $299.00
Seattle, WA           -     Bellingham, WA        -      $59.00
Seattle, WA           -     Eureka, CA            -      $99.00
Seattle, WA           -     Fresno, CA            -     $149.00
Seattle, WA           -     Great Falls, MT       -     $109.00
Seattle, WA           -     Ketchikan, AK         -     $269.00
Seattle, WA           -     Medford, OR           -      $99.00
Seattle, WA           -     Redding, CA           -      $99.00
Seattle, WA           -     Redmond, OR           -      $79.00
Seattle, WA           -     Sacramento, CA        -     $119.00
Seattle, WA           -     San Diego, CA         -     $189.00
Seattle, WA           -     Sitka, AK             -     $269.00
Sitka, AK             -     Seattle, WA           -     $269.00
Spokane, WA           -     Eureka, CA            -     $189.00
Spokane, WA           -     Fresno, CA            -     $199.00
Spokane, WA           -     Redding, CA           -     $189.00
Tucson, AZ            -     Redmond, OR           -     $269.00
Vancouver, BC         -     Los Angeles, CA       -     $229.00
Vancouver, BC         -     Portland, OR          -      $73.00
Vancouver, BC         -     San Francisco, CA     -     $179.00
Yakutat, AK           -     Cordova, AK           -     $119.00

Additional markets are available at:
http://shopping.alaskaair.com/webspecials/start.asp. Check the Alaska Web
Specials page periodically as additional markets and dates may be added.

Web Special details:
Valid on Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air only.
Seats are limited and may not be available on all flights/dates.
Offer is for a very limited time and is subject to change without notice.
Valid on new bookings only.
Reservations must be made using the Alaska Airlines Web Site. Tickets
require immediate purchase by credit card when reservations are made.
Ticketing will be electronic, using Instant Ticket services.
Tickets are non-refundable, non-changeable and are of no value after the
last date of your planned travel.
Fares quoted do not include Passenger Facilities Charges of up to $12 or
segment fees of $2.50 per flight segment.  A flight segment is defined as
one takeoff and one landing.
Other restrictions apply.

For special value rates at Hilton Hotels in Alaska Airlines cities visit
the Hilton Web site
at:http://www.hilton.com/specials/values/akairvalues.html

You are receiving this message today because you subscribed to our Email
Notification Service.

While we,d be pleased to continue to tell you about our great products and
prices, you can unsubscribe to our Email Notification Service by visiting
our Web site at: http://www2.alaskaair.com/listserv/webmail.asp

Please do not respond to this message.  Mail sent to this address cannot
be answered.


Rick and Ted,

It looks more like foxes building chicken houses as opposed to foxes guarding
chicken houses.

I shall send a message to Bryan saying that the Research has to look under
the hood and examine the mechanics
of the model in order to sign off on it. A dog and pony show is not
sufficient. In any case, the decision to approve
the model should not be left to Ben and Kirstee.

Please, let me know what your thinking is.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000
01:31 PM ---------------------------

Bryan Seyfried
11/10/2000 03:20 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: VaR for EnronCredit.com

Vince/Steve -- we are going to the Board in December to ask for formal
limits.  As you know one of the key limits at the Board level is Value at
Risk. To that end, it is imperative that you are comfortable with our
approach for calculating VaR.  We have implemented a third party risk system
which holds all of our positions and are in the process of putting the debt
positions in.  The system has a VaR engine which is being demo'd by the
vendor today.  Ben and Kirstee are attending the demo and if they find the
technology acceptable, I propose moving forward with implemantion of the
module.  Pls. let me know if this sounds reasonable and how you would
envision implementing.

thanks


Not sure.  It seems to be sporadic.  Another issue is the work load imposed on Cara when she has scheduling conflicts.  She has had to schedule a lot lately.  We'll figure it out ...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Belden, Tim
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 6:22 AM
To:	Scholtes, Diana
Subject:	Reduced Work Week!

How?


FYI
Thanks
Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent:	Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:37 PM
> To:	Andy Pickens (E-mail); Barrett H. Reasoner (E-mail); David J. Noonan
> (E-mail); Jean Frizzell (E-mail); Michael L. Kirby (E-mail); Michael
> Molland; Mike D. Smith (E-mail); Peter Meringolo; Richard B. Sanders Esq.
> (E-mail); Robert C. Williams (E-mail); Susan Bisop (E-mail)
> Subject:	FW: Operational Questions
> Importance:	High
>
> FYI
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent:	Tuesday, January 16, 2001 11:19 AM
> To:	Richard Rochman (E-mail)
> Subject:	Operational Questions
> Importance:	High
>
> Rich,
> 	I just received a phone call from the IT department at EPMI.  They
> have two computers which require immediate maintenance.  The first is a
> desktop of an individual who sits at the front desk.  Her work station is
> inoperable and part of the fix may be to format the hard drive.  Second,
> there is a laptop for someone who is not a trader, which will not boot.
> In order to repair that machine, they may have to format the hard drive as
> well.  At the present time, there is no easy way to copy the contents of
> the hard drive before those machines are repaired, because they are
> inoperable.
>
> 	Based on our prior discussions, it is my understanding that for
> operational needs such as these, EPMI is free to repair these machines
> notwithstanding the request for preservation of data.
>
> 	If for any reason you have a different understanding, please let me
> know immediately.
>
> Sincerely,
> Gary Fergus
>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Greg Stachnick
1038 Tuquoise St. 1
San Diego, CA 92109
gstachni@ucsd.edu

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Greg Stachnick


Tana:
Here is the draft of the letter to be given to the participants of the
training sessions for ConfirmLogic.  If you could review this for content to
make sure that I've covered the purpose that Tom Gros asked for which was to
emphasize that what is done in CL will not have any legal consequence and
that the confirmation process will remain intact during the beta period.

I've got our first user training tomorrow at 3pm

Thanks,
KC


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 02/04/2000
02:31 PM ---------------------------

Scot Chambers@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/24/2000 08:11 PM
To: Doug Sewell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Clement Lau@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Benjamin
Rogers@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Project Eval Form

guys, here's that info sheet we discussed.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scot Chambers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
01/24/2000 08:13 PM ---------------------------

Kirk McDaniel
10/22/99 05:19 PM
To: Scot Chambers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Project Eval Form

Scot

As per your request.


Plse  have fax delivered home.

Today is the day.  I have been a mom for 21 years.  Can't be true.

Still on conference call.  Ben has been very nice.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/07/2001 02:46 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: David Marshall

Is today Paige's birthday or tomorrow.  Of course if it was great news, then
it could be a celebratory drink.  I told Ric I may come by for a drink, but I
didn't know yet.  I think I'll call and get exact directions.

Do you need this fax I got from King and Spalding with comments on Midway?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/07/2001 02:43 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: David Marshall

No news today.  I don't want to know today, as I'm drinking champagne and
ignoring the issue,