NETWORK WORLD NEWSLETTER: DAVE KEARNS on
NOVELL NETWARE
01/15/02
Today's focus: We have the answers

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

In this issue:

* Give Novell online support forums a chance
* Links related to Novell NetWare
* Featured reader resource

_______________________________________________________________
This newsletter sponsored by
Novell

Novell NetWare 6

With NetWare 6, your network is just a browser away.
You've read all the great reviews about how you can
access your file, print and other storage resources from
any browser anywhere with NetWare
 6. Now click here
and get updated product information and downloads.
http://nww1.com/go/3808321a.html
_______________________________________________________________
PRODUCT INFO IN ONE CONVENIENT LOCATION!

Heard about a new product launch? Curious to find out if the
features and benefits of this new product will meet your
critical business needs? Network World Fusion's Product Central
section includes all the info you need to make informed
decision about new products and also includes a product finder
function. Check it out at http://nww1.com/go/ad216.html

_______________________________________________________________
Today's focus: We have the answers

By Dave Kearns

Last week's Network World included an opinion piece titled
"Finding grief instead of answers" by Shari Loback. In general,
it was about all vendors' online tech support, but she led
with a diatribe about Novell's online support forums that
included both inaccurate and misleading information.

Loback - who holds MCSE, CNE and CCNA certifications - is a
network engineer at InPro and formed her impressions of
Novell's online forums after using only the Web-based front-
end. Most veterans of that forum, as well as other support
venues, will tell you that using the network news interface is
much easier to read and follow.

She's also mistaken in "recalling" that Novell's forums
"...provided timely, helpful responses from Novell technicians
who seemed to have a solid grasp of the products." In fact,
Novell's support forums haven't been staffed by Novell
employees in almost 15 years - since the very early days of
NetWire on Compuserve.

The forums at http://support.novell.com/forums/ have always
been staffed by volunteers - a motley, but knowledgeable, group
of dedicated professionals formerly called the "NetWare SysOps"
and then later called the "Novell Support Connection Volunteers."
The group is now officially known as "Novell Technical Support
Volunteer SysOps" (but only by one or two people at Novell).

The volunteers form an eclectic group of individuals with
experience in almost all areas of networking. Most importantly,
these folks actually use the products they are supporting -
they aren't just recent college grads reading an infobase.
Check the sysops' bios at
http://support.novell.com/forums/sysop_info.html and you'll
find a fascinating group whose members are scattered around the
world. While often disagreeing with each other about most
things, these folks are united by their desire to deliver the
most accurate and complete support information to the many
users of the forums.

Loback does make some good points. There is no longer a
"search" function for the Web interface (one is being
developed, but is not yet available. Until then, you can use
Google Groups (http://groups.google.com/ ) to search the forums.

Threading of messages also leaves a lot to be desired when
viewed through the Web interface, which can make it difficult
for you to know when a reply to your question has been posted.
But if you are only an occasional user, searching at
http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search?hl=en using your
own name as the author quickly returns your original question
as well as any responses. Even better, use a newsreader (like
those built into Internet Explorer or Netscape) and have all of
the messages properly threaded for you.

Novell's Support Connection forums are a great buy (they're
free) and provide great information as well as accurate (i.e.,
no marketing allowed!) support. The volunteers aren't afraid to
suggest non-Novell solutions where appropriate. If you aren't
using these forums, then you aren't providing the best support
for your network.

Disclaimer: Dave Kearns was a founding sysop of NetWire on
Compuserve and still volunteers his time to help out on the
Novell Support Connection forums.

Editor's corrections: Lindsey Johnstone works for the City of
Seattle, not Novell and it is the city of Brampton in Ontario
that has bought into ZenWorks for Desktops (see last week's
"Novell picked for massive e-government project").

_______________________________________________________________
To contact Dave Kearns:

Dave Kearns is a writer and consultant in Silicon Valley. His
most recent book is "Peter Norton's Complete Guide to Networks,"
published by SAMS. Dave's company, Virtual Quill, provides
content services to network vendors: books, manuals, white
papers, lectures and seminars, marketing, technical marketing
and support documents. Virtual Quill provides "words to sell
by..." Find out more at http://www.vquill.com/ or by e-mail
at mailto:info@vquill.com
_______________________________________________________________
Get your wireless service from the carrier ranked #1 by Forbes
magazine.  Now get Unlimited Night & Weekend Minutes, plus up
to $165 in savings when you activate on select calling plans
and purchase a Nokia 3360 or 8260 from AT&T Wireless. To learn
more go to http://nww1.com/go/ad207.html
_______________________________________________________________
RELATED EDITORIAL LINKS

Finding grief instead of answers
Network World, 01/07/02
http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2002/0107loback.html

Novell support forums
http://support.novell.com/forums/

Novell adding portal punch
Network World, 01/14/02
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2002/129015_01-14-2002.html

Breaking Novell and NetWare news, updated daily:
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/financial/novell.html

Archive of the Novell NetWare newsletter:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/netware/index.html
______________________________________________________________
FEATURED READER RESOURCE

Network World Fusion's Net.Worker site

Whether your company is growing larger or scaling back,
corporate managers are looking for ways to cut costs while
retaining and recruiting star employees. One smart solution -
at least on paper - is to let some employees work from home.
Network World's Net.Worker Web site bridges the gap between the
telework concept and the hardware, software and services needed
to make it happen. We bring you news and reviews, sound advice
and keen insight into the technologies and solutions you need
to manage a remote and mobile workforce.

Visit http://www.nwfusion.com/net.worker/index.html
_______________________________________________________________
May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered
at your fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by
receiving 51 FREE issues to our print publication. Apply
today at http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl
_______________________________________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To unsubscribe from promotional e-mail go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/ep

To change your e-mail address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Director of
Online Sales, at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2002

------------------------
This message was sent to:  vkamins@enron.com


Here is CLECA's (Barbara Barkovich's) current thinking.

 - CLECA proposal.doc


Dick:

That will be fine.  However, you need to attach the trade confirmation
(marked Exhibit "A") to each of your certificates since that is how each
certificate is drafted.

Thus, for the April 12, 2001 transaction, please resend your certificates
with the appropriate attachments as referenced in the certificates.   Please
call if you have any questions.

Thanks for ;your assistance.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	"Dick D VARNER" <Dick.Varner@EWEB.Eugene.OR.US>
	05/01/2001 04:02 PM

		 To: <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Representations for ISDA Transaction

From our end, we would like to have the direct reference to the specific
confirm.  I know it is a little more hassle, but it works better for us
politically.

>>> <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 05/01/01 01:14PM >>>
Dick:

I never heard back from you regarding my email of 4/18/01.  I had asked if
you would mind revising the forms of certificate which we will attach to
each trade confirmation.

We would appreciate revisions to the April 12, 2001 certificates.  This
will be the format for all future transactions.

Please send revisions to Kimberly Hundl.  Her phone number is (713)
853-1647 and fax if (713) 646-2443.

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 03:07 PM -----

                    Sara
                    Shackleton           To:     "Dick D VARNER"
<Dick.Varner@EWEB.Eugene.OR.US>@ENRON
                                         cc:     Kimberly
Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron
                    04/18/2001           Subject:     Re: Representations for
ISDA Transaction(Document link: Sara
                    10:57 AM             Shackleton)

Dick:

I am suggesting a minor change to the "Power Risk Management Committee"
certificate (to eliminate the reference to the Exhibit "A").  If we leave
the reference in the certificate, you will always have to label the confirm
as Exhibit "A" and resend the completed papers to us.  Please let me know
if you are alright with this change.  If so, we ask that you please resend
the certificate dated April 12, 2001.  If you do not wish to make the
change, please resend the two certificates to which the confirmation
labeled Exhibit "A" is attached.

Please call if you have any questions.  Thanks.

(See attached file: EWEBISDA Confirm RepresentationsR1.doc)

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Dick D VARNER"
                    <Dick.Varner@EWEB.Eug        To:
<Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
                    ene.OR.US>                   cc:
<Holli.Krebs@enron.com>
                                                 Subject:     Re:
Representations for ISDA Transaction
                    04/12/2001 07:00 PM

Thanks, Sara.  No problem making the changes.

>>> <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 04/12/01 01:56PM >>>

Dick:

Attached are my comments to the certificates.  We will need to attach the
form of confirmation to be certain that each particular transaction is
authorized.  Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.

(See attached file: EWEBISDA Confirm RepresentationsR1.doc)

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Dick D VARNER"
                    <Dick.Varner@EWEB.Eug        To:
<sara.shackleton@enron.com>
                    ene.OR.US>                   cc:
<Holli.Krebs@enron.com>, "Bert I DUNN"

<Bert.Dunn@EWEB.Eugene.OR.US>
                    04/12/2001 11:09 AM          Subject:
Representations for ISDA Transaction

Attached are drafts of two certificates which I believe will satisfy you
needs.  Please get back to me with any comments.

(See attached file: ISDA Confirm Representations)


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 11:01 AM -----

	Britt Davis@ENRON
	11/30/2000 09:35 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: In re M/V HAVMANN

Richard,

Please let me know how you want me to answer the question posed at the end of
the attached e-mail.

Britt
----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000 09:32 AM -----

	Britt Davis
	11/27/2000 08:52 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Becky Zikes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Deborah Shahmoradi/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: In re M/V HAVMANN

Richard,

I have confirmed with David Best this morning that the settlement in this
matter is "done and dusted", to use David's phrase.  I have received, and
will shortly send to you, a letter from our underwriters' counsel, confirming
the settlement.  Payment will be made within twenty-one days, which means
before year-end.  Our barrister and expert have been advised to stop work
immediately.  Parenthetically, we were able to avoid becoming liable for the
7,500 pound advance to our barrister that would have otherwise come due last
Friday.

Let me know if you want me to participate in a conference with John Nowlan to
explain our reasons for the settlement.  By the way, this finally wraps up
all the M/V HAVMANN arbitration/litigation.  Best advises that there is no
one left for us to pursue, and no one left who is pursuing us.

One question:  Best wants to know if you want the $475,000 to come directly
to us, or to come to him, and to be disbursed to us by him net of agreed fees
and expenses that we owe.  One way or another, I assume that you ultimately
want the money wired to us, but I wonder if you know of a person (or
department) from whom to determine the proper wire transfer account/address.
If not, I am sure that I can find out.  Thanks.

Britt


Hi Jaideep!

My first suggestion is that you come to Houston as scheduled (and arranged
with Wharton nearly 3 weeks ago).  Alternatively, rely on your Tiger
teammates to gather information necessary to respond to the project.  Should
circumstances lead you to decide not to come for this trip, please return the
ticket issued to you.  Should it make sense for you to visit Enron some time
in the future, we can discuss arrangements at that time.

Hope to see you soon!

--Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2001
01:22 AM ---------------------------

"Jaideep Singh" <singhjai@wharton.upenn.edu> on 01/17/2001 08:58:51 PM
To: <Christie.Patrick@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Houston Trip

Hello Christie,

Thank you for organizing the Wharton trip to Enron.  Unfortunately, the
flight setup for tomorrow is way too early for me as I'll have to miss over
4 hours of classes, which I cannot afford to do.  I tried changing the time
with Continental and there latest flight leaves at 6PM - which does not work
for me (smack in the middle of my 3 hour class)

Thus the dilemma that I find myself in is the following:

a. Try a different flight as I can make any flight after 7:30PM (however, I
have no control over reservations/budget etc)
b. As it is possible to delay travel upto 1 year, use this ticket to come
some other time

Sorry for this but I just saw the  bookings today.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,
Jaideep


Can either of you verify this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001
10:18 AM ---------------------------

Paul Couvillon@ENRON
01/31/2001 02:45 PM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joanie H Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Deal # 529159 for December 2000

Gary:

For Company 12 could you please put in a buy-back for Reliant Energy HL&P on
Contract # 96022113 for the volume of 1,286 Mmbtu's on 12/27/2000.  The
pipeline and point are HPL/UTTC-HARDY STREET MIDCON (BI-DIRECTIONAL) and the
scheduler is Mary Poorman @ X-35251.

The pricing should be as follows;
The lower of KATY MID day of flow or day after.

The pricing of KATY MID for 10/27 was $ 10.26
                10/28 was $ 9.63.

The sale counter-part to this purchase should go to deal # 529159.


I thought that someone retrieved the originals (which has been signed by GE
but not Enron) while I was in Ft. Worth for my dad's surgery. Marty mentioned
that you were looking for them, so I thought  he had given them to you (he's
out this week).  I have not seen the termination agreement since I returned.
Did you and John leave fully executed termination agreements in my office?
Maybe someone else picked them up.

I can't tell you what's going on with the assignment.  Perhaps Peggy Banczak
can help out with that.

Kay

Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/17/2000 08:00 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Vitro/Termination agreement

Schroeder and I left two signed originals with you, so what does "processed"
mean.  Yes, thankyou for asking, GE has received their fully executed
original, and therefore should be prepared to issue the invoice to
Purchaser.  But I have not seen the invoice yet.

What is the status of the assignment of the GE contract to Mitsui?  Did the
invoice go to them?

To: Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peggy
Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Vitro/Termination agreement

I haven't seen a signed copy of the termination agreement cross my desk.  I
just want to make sure that the fully executed document has been processed.

Thanks,

Kay


This is the latest from Imelda.


Shona:  Thank you for your memo.  I think it is a good idea to define roles
and responsibilities and I appreciate the fact  that you have taken the
initiative to do so.  However, I do have the following comments:

1) I have some accountability to Rick Buy for the success of this effort,
therefore I (or my designee) need to be involved in Doorstep pre- planning
and post-mortem.  I will be involved in reviewing the final report before
presentation and will attend  the meeting when the report is presented to Buy
and Causey.

2) I realize that  in the interest of getting a review done timely it is
sometimes necessary to "divide and conquer".  However, where logistically
possible, I believe that it makes sense for my people to be involved in
meetings held with Commercial personnel.  This facilitates understanding
operations, document flow, points of contact, report writing as well as
furthering our goal of educating "multi-functional" people so that we can
continue to reduce the resources necessary to perform these reviews.

3) There are still some detailed issues that need to be clarified regarding
the database.  Let's schedule another meeting with Cassandra and Donna.

Please let me know if you have any questions,         Regards,       Rick


Effective today, I am designating Janel Guerrero as the primary point person for Enron's comprehensive RTO efforts.  In this capacity, she will be coordinating all of the advocacy functions outside of the FERC mediation process. This effort is absolutely of the highest priority for the company. Please cooperate with Janel to the fullest and coordinate with her on all of your strategic efforts and communications that are related to the RTO effort.

Thanks very much.

Additional details regarding our RTO campaign are attached.  Please feel free to call either Janel or myself with any questions you may have.


Please see attached speaking points.  African-American points on page 2.
?
--Dave
 - Arena Agreement Fact Sheet.doc


greg:
what is the (correct) formula you devised for profitability on last trade is
mid?


Tana/Kelly/Karen:

The product long descriptions below will fall under three new product types:
   US HeatingOil2 Fin Opt
   US HeatingOil2 Fin Opt Call
 US HeatingOil2 Fin Opt Put

Credit (Tom Moran) has approved copying the profiles for the new product type
from the following:

 US HeatingOil2 Fin Swap

Please respond no later than 10 a.m. on Wednesday, April 25.

Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Moran, Tom
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:04 PM
To: Sever, Stephanie
Subject: FW: Product Type approval for 3 product types (Heating Oil Fin
Options)

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Moran, Tom
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 1:11 PM
To: Lees, Lisa
Cc: Guidroz, Walter
Subject: FW: Product Type approval for 3 product types (Heating Oil Fin
Options)

Lisa,

Please copy the existing counterparty profiles from: &US HeatingOil2 Fin
Swap8 and use it for these three new products:

US HtOil Fin Opt Nymex HO   AP
US HeatOil2 Opt Nymex HO   EP
US HeatOil2 Opt Nymex HO   EC

Regards,
tm

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Walker, Chris
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Blumenthal, Jeff; Musch, Susan; Hagelmann, Bjorn; Moran, Tom; Swinney,
John; Taylor, Mark
Cc: Lees, Lisa; Sever, Stephanie; Jones, Tana; Lambert, Karen; Lombardi,
Kelly; Sweitzer, Tara; Kenne, Dawn C.; Moorer, Torrey; Meredith, Kevin;
Lozano, Melba; Hunter, Larry Joe; Cass, Robert B.
Subject: Product Type approval for 3 product types (Heating Oil Fin Options)

Your approval is needed for the following 3 product types in Datamanager:

US HeatingOil2 Fin Opt
US HeatingOil2 Fin Opt Call
US HeatingOil2 Fin Opt Put

Please do not approve between the hours of 6 am and 11 am.

US HtOil Fin Opt Nymex HO   AP 85.00           Dec01          c/GL-L

A financial Option Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which
the Seller receives the Premium and the Buyer receives the Cash Settlement
Amount. Each calendar month during the Term of the Transaction will be a
Determination Period, provided that if the Term of the Transaction is less
than one calendar month the Determination Period shall be the Term of the
Transaction. The Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be
calculated from the volume submitted by Counterparty on the Website in
accordance with the unit of measure. The Premium shall equal the product of
(i) the price submitted by Counterparty via the Website, multiplied by (ii)
the Notional Quantity per Determination Period, multiplied by (iii) the
number of Determination Periods during the Term of the Transaction. The
Payment Date for the Premium shall be 2 business days after the Trade Date of
the Transaction. The Payment Date(s) for the Cash Settlement Amount shall be
5 business days after the Cash Settlement Amount is determinable.  Where this
Transaction is a Call Option, the Cash Settlement Amount shall be the greater
of (i) zero, or (ii) the product of (a) the Notional Quantity per
Determination Period, multiplied by (b) the Index minus the Strike Price.
Where this Transaction is a Put Option, the Cash Settlement Amount shall be
the greater of (i) zero, or (ii) the product of (a) the Notional Quantity per
Determination Period, multiplied by (b) the Strike Price minus the Index.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Dec 2001
to the Termination Date of 31 Dec 2001.
The Exercise Period(s) shall be the last Trading Day of the NYMEX Heating Oil
Contract during the applicable Determination Period. The Index for a
Determination Period shall be the simple arithmetic average of the daily
settlement prices of the prompt month NYMEX Heating Oil Futures Contract for
each Trading Day during such Determination Period.
The price is quoted in cents (US) per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the volume is shown shall be 42,000 gallons
per month.
The Option style and type shall be an Asian Put/Call. Automatic Exercise is
Applicable.
The Strike Price for the Transaction shall be as set forth on the Website.

US HeatOil2 Opt Nymex HO   EP 85.00           Dec01          c/GL-L

A financial Option Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which
the Seller receives the Premium and the Buyer receives the Cash Settlement
Amount. Each calendar month during the Term of the Transaction will be a
Determination Period, provided that if the Term of the Transaction is less
than one calendar month the Determination Period shall be the Term of the
Transaction. The Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be
calculated from the volume submitted by Counterparty on the Website in
accordance with the unit of measure. The Premium shall equal the product of
(i) the price submitted by Counterparty via the Website, multiplied by (ii)
the Notional Quantity per Determination Period, multiplied by (iii) the
number of Determination Periods during the Term of the Transaction. The
Payment Date for the Premium shall be 2 business days after the Trade Date of
the Transaction. The Payment Date(s) for the Cash Settlement Amount shall be
5 business days after the Cash Settlement Amount is determinable. The Cash
Settlement Amount shall be the greater of (i) zero, or (ii) the product of
(a) the Notional Quantity per Determination Period, multiplied by (b) the
Strike Price minus the Index
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Dec  2001
to the Termination Date of 31 Dec 2001.
The Exercise Period(s) shall be the last Trading Day of the NYMEX Heating Oil
Options Contract for the applicable Determination Period. The Index for a
Determination Period shall be the settlement price for the NYMEX Heating Oil
Futures Contract for the applicable Determination Period on the expiration
day of the NYMEX Heating Oil Options Contract for such Determination Period.
The price is quoted in cents (US) per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the volume is shown shall be 42,000 gallons
per month.
The Option style and type shall be a European Put ("EP"). Automatic Exercise
is Applicable.
The Strike Price for the Transaction shall be as set forth on the Website.

US HeatOil2 Opt Nymex HO   EC 85.00           Dec01          c/GL-L

A financial Option Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which
the Seller receives the Premium and the Buyer receives the Cash Settlement
Amount. Each calendar month during the Term of the Transaction will be a
Determination Period, provided that if the Term of the Transaction is less
than one calendar month the Determination Period shall be the Term of the
Transaction. The Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be
calculated from the volume submitted by Counterparty on the Website in
accordance with the unit of measure. The Premium shall equal the product of
(i) the price submitted by Counterparty via the Website, multiplied by (ii)
the Notional Quantity per Determination Period, multiplied by (iii) the
number of Determination Periods during the Term of the Transaction. The
Payment Date for the Premium shall be 2 business days after the Trade Date of
the Transaction. The Payment Date(s) for the Cash Settlement Amount shall be
5 business days after the Cash Settlement Amount is determinable. The Cash
Settlement Amount shall be the greater of (i) zero, or (ii) the product of
(a) the Notional Quantity per Determination Period, multiplied by (b) the
Index minus the Strike Price.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Dec  2001
to the Termination Date of 31 Dec 2001.
The Exercise Period(s) shall be the last Trading Day of the NYMEX Heating Oil
Options Contract for the applicable Determination Period. The Index for a
Determination Period shall be the settlement price for the NYMEX Heating Oil
Futures Contract for the applicable Determination Period on the expiration
day of the NYMEX Heating Oil Options Contract for such Determination Period.
The price is quoted in cents (US) per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the volume is shown shall be 42,000 gallons
per month.
The Option style and type shall be a European Call ("EC"). Automatic Exercise
is Applicable.
The Strike Price for the Transaction shall be as set forth on the Website.

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


Papers on hedging for Roberts  58911

Vince


Transwestern's average deliveries to California were 1118 MMBtu/d (100%) with
San Juan lateral throughput at 812 MMBtu/d and Rio Puerco at 75 MMBtu/d.
Total east deliveries averaged 291 MMBtu/d.

El Paso's average deliveries to California were 2355 MMBtu/d (80%) :
- PG&ETop (capacity 1140 MMBtu/d) deliveries averaged 666 MMBtu/d (58%)
- SoCalEhr (capacity 1248 MMBtu/d) deliveries averaged 1191 MMBtu/d (95%)
- SoCalTop (capacity 541 MMBtu/d) deliveries averaged 498 MMBtu/d (92%)

Friday posted Gas Daily prices:
 SoCal gas, large pkgs  15.35
 PG&E, large pkgs  14.25
 TW San Juan      5.82
 TW Permian      5.985

Friday Enron Online bases:
  Mar  Apr-Jun  Jul-Sep  Oct
Perm-CA 4.47  2.26  3.31  2.16
SJ - CA  4.79  2.72  3.78  2.64
SJ-Waha   .24      .44    .45       .46
Perm-Waha   .085       .015    .015                   .015


How about talking Monday pm?

There were a ridiculous amount of handouts again on Thursday, some of which
directly related to next week's assignments.  I thought the quiz was
straight forward enough.

Mark - my mom and I were going to go to the Pottery Barn Kids in Corte
Madera on Saturday, so perhaps we could stop by your house to drop off
copies of the handouts on our way in or out.  Send me directions again to
your house if you would.

I'm not sure how we can get copies to you Jeff.  I could drop them off to
your place in SF if that works.  Let me know.

Thanks,
CV

Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA  94105

phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: cvavrek@deloitte.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Guinney [mailto:Mark_Guinney@watsonwyatt.com]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 8:58 AM
To: Anil Sama; cvavrek@deloitte.com; Guinney@haas.berkeley.edu;
Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com
Subject: Re[2]: FIA assignment

Was the case materials handed out in class?  If so, any care to fax it to
me.
Fax #415-733-4190.

Thanks

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    Re: FIA assignment
Author: asama@yahoo.com (Anil Sama)
Date:       02/16/2001 1:55 PM

Jeff, Mark:

Wondering where you were yesterday. Hope you didn't
forget about the in-class quiz!

The next HW and writeup due next week seems like
a heavy one.
Do most of you have Monday off? I'll take a look at the
case/HW Sa/Su, and prefer a meeting / conf call anytime
Monday. Perhaps PM in the city if folks are working
that day? Sunday PM (after 7) works for me too.

-Anil

--- "Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco)"
<cvavrek@deloitte.com> wrote:
> Congrats crew - we got a 9 on case #2.
> When is everyone available between now and Wed pm to talk
> about case #3 and
> the other homework?
> - cv
>
> Carolyn M. Vavrek
> Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
> Deloitte & Touche
> 50 Fremont Street
> San Francisco, CA  94105
>
> phone: 415-783-5137
> fax: 415-783-8760
> e-mail: cvavrek@deloitte.com
>
> - This message (including any attachments) contains
> confidential information
> intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
> protected by law.  -
> If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete
> this message and
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or
> distribution of this
> message, or the taking of any action based on it, is
> strictly prohibited.
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  -
If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


1). Hickerson does not have any products up yet. I need to find out from Bridges where we are with Cargill. He has been in meetings all morning, I will revert when I know.

2). To be honest I think we are nowhere with Dow, but I have left that to Berberian. I haven't heard a peep from anyone on this. I will find out.

3). I think it is 50/50 on GM. They clearly are interested, but are not very clear on what they are trying to accomplish. They do want to make markets. I think our best bet is an EOL product hosting deal, but their internal process will be excruciating. Next step is they will meet with alan Engberg to discuss listing 7 to 8 petchems on EOL.

4). I have not been moving forward on service level contract because I do not think it really adds any value at the present time.

5). I do think we should seriously consider the case for charging an access fee to EOL. This should not be viewed as a commission.

6). I spoke with Vin Viola of NYMEX and he is interested in pursuing this idea of clearer as credit sleeve for locals. He is tough to pin down and negotiate with but we will run this down by end of next week.

7). Re:kiodex, it is coming slowly as we have a lot of things on the development/testing schedule right now.

8). As you know we are in receipt of the ICE API. We have not been able to do much work on it given 7).


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000
06:57 PM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
12/06/2000 05:51 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: [Fwd: Fw: PRICELESS]

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000
05:51 PM --------------------------->
>

 - pic26962.jpg


Kay,  Herman suggested the changes to our form of Memorandum (in red).  My
question is, since we are defining Optionee as "________________________,
LLC, its designee or permitted assignees"  is it really necessary to include
the second reference to designee or permitted assignees?

This MEMORANDUM OF PURCHASE OPTION (this "Memorandum") is made and entered
into effective as of the _____________________, 2001 by and between
_______________________________ (hereinafter referred to as "Optionor"), and
____________________________________, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability,
OR ITS DESIGNEE OR PERMITTED ASSIGNEES (hereinafter referred to as
"Optionee").  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the
meaning given to them in that certain Option to Purchase Real Estate dated
__________________________, 2001, by and between Optionor and Optionee (the
&Agreement8).

Optionor and Optionee are parties to the Agreement covering certain real
property situated in ____________________________ County, ______________, and
more particularly described on Exhibit &A8 attached hereto and incorporated
for all purposes (the &Property8).  Pursuant to the Agreement, Optionor
granted to Optionee an option to purchase the Property (the &Option8), as
more particularly described therein, which Option expires _____________
(subject to Optionee,s rights to extend the Option for ___________ renewal
term(s) of ______________ (____) months ending ________________________,
unless Optionee, ITS DESIGNEE OR ITS PERMITTED ASSIGNEE delivers to Optionor
a notice of exercise of its option to purchase the Property prior to such
expiration date, as may be extended.

Kathleen Carnahan
Enron North  America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3146d
Houston, TX 77002
Phone - (713) 345-3386
Fax - (713) 646-3037


Me too.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Robert Rivera
> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 5:45 PM
> To: Richard Sanders (E-mail)
> Cc: Neal S. Manne
> Subject: Citrus/Duke
>
> Richard:
>
> Happy new year!  I hope that you and your family had a great holiday
> season.
>
> My notes of our meeting on the 21st show that you wanted us to interview
> Gerstandt, McDonald (if possible), Sharp, and Kaiser.  Please let me know
> at your convenience when you'd like for us to meet with them.  I'm
> available to do it pretty much anytime this week.  Thanks.
>
> Robert Rivera, Jr.
> Susman Godfrey L.L.P.
> 1000 Louisiana St., Ste. 5100
> Houston, TX 77002
> (713) 653-7809
> rrivera@susmangodfrey.com
>


-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 2:39 PM
To: Milnthorp, Rob; Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.; Presto, Kevin M.
Subject: FW: NETCo HR skeleton crew

-----Original Message-----
From: Oxley, David
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Kitchen, Louise
Subject: NETCo HR skeleton crew

I tracked back through the HR names to see if I can get to 9. They would be:

Specialists
Neil Davies  - team lead
Kari Oquinn - comp
Tony Garrett - payroll and benefits
Karen Buckley - recruiting, A&A's, training and management reports
Generalists
Jeanie Slone - OTC, Gas Commercial teams, Denver, Mexico, New York
Amy Fitzpatrick - Power Commercial teams, Calgary and Portland
Mandy Curless - IT, Back office and support groups

Me
Julie Clyatt - group admin

Please bear in mind it would be imperative to make sure the following stay in estate for at least 90 days and help us with transition (ie not sure we can do everything we need to with above team):

*Tana Cashion - Generalist
Sarah Zargowski - Generalist
Anne Labbe - Admin
*Julie Kearney - Portland/Calagry HR rep
Charles Philpot - HRIS
Tharsie Broussard - Comp reporting number 2.

Above are names I am suggesting come off list to get to 9.* names are one's ideally I'd like to add back.

David


Attached for your information is the Eastern Hemisphere presentation at the
LNG offsite on Monday.

Clay


Christi --  I don't think it changes the requirement to file by October 1 either, and we are proceeding under the same schedule.  Several rehearing requests were submitted, including one for ENA/EES.  However, note the following which I sent out in an earlier message to the ENA/EES western commercial and government affairs folks (I noted you deleted your message without reading it.)  I consider the tolling of the rehearing order along with this OMB ruling a good sign.

As detailed in the attached FERC notice, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved FERC's Information Collection Request for "Reporting of Natural Gas Sales to the California Market" through the six-month emergency period that will expire on 1/31/02.  (Emergency reporting requirements are automatically approved for six months under the OMB regulations.)  However, it gave FERC several conditions that would have to be met before the reporting requirements could be extended.

OMB has advised FERC that, if it decides to request renewal of the Information Collection Request after that date, it must address certain issues as part of its supporting statement (more specifically, "include an explicit discussion").  As you may remember, in addition to requesting rehearing of the FERC order, ENA and EES submitted comments to OMB regarding our problems with FERC's estimate of the burden on affected companies of the proposed collection of information.  We pointed out that we do not manage our business in the manner contemplated by the reporting requirements, much less keep our records in that manner.  We manage our business on an aggregated basis, and complying with the requirements will require us to implement significant manual review and analysis to arbitrarily define the components of a sale.  We stated that we might even have to hire full-time staff to dedicate to the task.

The issues that we raised in our comments are the same ones that OMB requires FERC to address if they submit a request for approval to extend the reporting requirements past 1/31/02.  (FERC indicated in its July order that it intended to extend the reporting requirement through 9/30/02 to coincide with the end date of its mitigation plan.)  OMB questioned the practical utility of requiring disaggregated data when "commenters" reported that they did not maintain the data in a way that allowed them to report it that way.  OMB expressed concern that the data collection would require significant data manipulation in order to respond, and the resulting disaggregation would likely be artificial.  OMB also required FERC to evaluate its burden estimates after "consulting with respondents", and it must provide a list of the names, affiliates, and phone numbers of the respondents it contacted.

FERC has not yet issued an order on our rehearing request.  While we would not expect them to withdraw the reporting requirements entirely, it may be that the OMB action will affect their final decision.  At the least, it sends a signal!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:58 AM
To:	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Subject:	FW: Two proceeding changes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Mary Kay
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 5:45 PM
To:	Butler, Janet; Alvarez, Ray; Bagot, Nancy; Benner, Martha; Benson, Eric; Blair, Lynn; Boatman, Jack; Bradley, Rob; Branney, Theresa; Brennan, Lorna; Briggs, Tom; Comnes, Alan; Cordes, Bill; Corman, Shelley; Culwell, Christi; Daniel, Shonnie; Darveaux, Mary; Dietz, Rick; Dornan, Dari; Dushinske, John; Farrell, Sharon; Fossum, Drew; Fulton, Donna; Goodpasture, John; Hammond, Pearce; Harris, Steven; Hartsoe, Joe; Hass, Glen; Hayes, Robert; Hayslett, Rod; Heckerman, Bambi; Hess, Theresa; Hill, Robert; Holmes, Bradley; Holtzman, Staci; Hopkins, Tamara; Horton, Stanley; Huber, Lee; Janousek, Martha; January, Steven; Kean, Steven J.; Kilmer III, Robert; King Jr., Frazier; Kirk, Steve; Kissner, Tim; Lantefield, Laura; Lawrence, Linda L.; Lichtenwalter, Blair; Linnell, Elizabeth; Loeffler, Michael; Lokey, Teb; Lowry, Phil; Mann, Ruth; Mara, Susan; Martens, Donna; McCoppin, Dorothy; McGowan, Mike W.; Miller, Terri; Nacey, Sheila; Nelson, Kimberly (ETS); Neppl, Ray; Neubauer, Dave; Neufeld, Eva; Neustaedter, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah; Paladino, Ranelle; Palmer, Maureen; Paschal, Zelda; Patterson, Geneva; Pavlou, Maria; Petersen, Keith; Place, Janet; Porter, Gregory J.; Pribble, Dan; Pryor, Tony; Raker, Colleen; Rice, Randy; Ringblom, Kathy; Robertson, Linda; Saunders, James; Sawyer, Lisa; Scott, Donna; Shafer, John; Shapiro, Richard; 'Smith, Mike'; Soldano, Louis; Stanton, Lon; Steffes, James D.; Sullivan, Kathleen; Talcott, Jim; Taylor, Gina; Tu, Denis; Van Norden, Mike; Veatch, Stephen; Vignaroli, Donald; Warner, Jody; Watson, Kimberly; Wilkie, Kim; Wilson, Rob; Winckowski, Michele; Wininger, James; Yoho, Lisa; Atkisson, Margaret; Bianchi, Rita; Bourg, Naomi; Lehn, Terry; Puetz, Fred
Subject:	RE: Two proceeding changes

Does this result in any change to the requirements to comply on 9/30?  I don't see any, but was curious??  Mary Kay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Butler, Janet
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 5:11 PM
To:	Alvarez, Ray; Bagot, Nancy; Benner, Martha; Benson, Eric; Blair, Lynn; Boatman, Jack; Bradley, Rob; Branney, Theresa; Brennan, Lorna; Briggs, Tom; Butler, Janet; Comnes, Alan; Cordes, Bill; Corman, Shelley; Culwell, Christi; Daniel, Shonnie; Darveaux, Mary; Dietz, Rick; Dornan, Dari; Dushinske, John; Farrell, Sharon; Fossum, Drew; Fulton, Donna; Goodpasture, John; Hammond, Pearce; Harris, Steven; Hartsoe, Joe; Hass, Glen; Hayes, Robert; Hayslett, Rod; Heckerman, Bambi; Hess, Theresa; Hill, Robert; Holmes, Bradley; Holtzman, Staci; Hopkins, Tamara; Horton, Stanley; Huber, Lee; Janousek, Martha; January, Steven; Kean, Steven J.; Kilmer III, Robert; King Jr., Frazier; Kirk, Steve; Kissner, Tim; Lantefield, Laura; Lawrence, Linda L.; Lichtenwalter, Blair; Linnell, Elizabeth; Loeffler, Michael; Lokey, Teb; Lowry, Phil; Mann, Ruth; Mara, Susan; Martens, Donna; McCoppin, Dorothy; McGowan, Mike W.; Miller, Mary Kay; Miller, Terri; Nacey, Sheila; Nelson, Kimberly (ETS); Neppl, Ray; Neubauer, Dave; Neufeld, Eva; Neustaedter, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah; Paladino, Ranelle; Palmer, Maureen; Paschal, Zelda; Patterson, Geneva; Pavlou, Maria; Petersen, Keith; Place, Janet; Porter, Gregory J.; Pribble, Dan; Pryor, Tony; Raker, Colleen; Rice, Randy; Ringblom, Kathy; Robertson, Linda; Saunders, James; Sawyer, Lisa; Scott, Donna; Shafer, John; Shapiro, Richard; Smith, Mike; Soldano, Louis; Stanton, Lon; Steffes, James D.; Sullivan, Kathleen; Talcott, Jim; Taylor, Gina; Tu, Denis; Van Norden, Mike; Veatch, Stephen; Vignaroli, Donald; Warner, Jody; Watson, Kimberly; Wilkie, Kim; Wilson, Rob; Winckowski, Michele; Wininger, James; Yoho, Lisa; Atkisson, Margaret; Bianchi, Rita; Bourg, Naomi; Lehn, Terry; Puetz, Fred
Subject:	Two proceeding changes

FERC issued this tolling order today  on natural gas sales to California

http://cips.ferc.fed.us/Q/CIPS/RULES/RM/RM01-9.001.TXT

and issued a notice rescheduling the Sixth Interstate Facility Planning Seminar until October 26, 2001

http://cips.ferc.fed.us/Q/CIPS/MISC/M_MS/MS092401.000.TXT


No problem -we'll re-confirm!

   Kate Symes @ ECT                11/17/2000 11:14 AM

To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Changed Deals - 460785, 460858, 460862

These deals were entered as flowing all days, and should have just been Mon -
Sat. This was my fault, as I didn't know my computer defaulted to all days.
(This has since been fixed!) I've changed them in the system and was told to
let you know so you can re-confirm the deals with just on-peak days. Sorry
about the hassle. I promise I'll get the hang of this soon!

Thanks,
Kate


The sale of Azurix North America to American Water Works will close tomorrow.  Azurix would like to issue the attached release after the close and receipt of payment tomorrow.  Your early review and comment would be greatly appreciated, as they also need to get the release to American Water Works once you have agreed to it.  I am at ext. 66423 if you have any questions.

John


[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Coverage Reiterated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Dividends  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Pos Surprises  [IMAGE] Neg Surprises  [IMAGE] Earnings Revisions  [IMAGE] IPO - Lockup Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Pricing  [IMAGE] IPO - Quite Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Postponements  [IMAGE] IPO - Withdrawals  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Filings     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update  my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot  Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add  / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View  My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for YHOO  follows from EquityAlert.com.     Multimedia Available: Yahoo! Messenger Launches ``IMVironments'' With Next Generation of Yahoo! Messenger Service   Oct 22, 2001 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Yahoo! Inc. (Nasdaq:YHOO), a leading global communications, commerce and media company, announced the next generation of its popular Yahoo!(R)Messenger service now enhanced with IMVironments(TM), a patent-pending technology that makes real-time communications even more personalized and expressive.   You can reach the story directly by going to http://www.newstream.com/cgi-bin/display_story.cgi?4173   This multimedia news story is for free and unrestricted use on your news information site (and for print or broadcast too). Visit http://www.newstream.com to download video, audio, text, graphics, and photos.   If you have any questions about the story, or about Newstream.com, please write to us at info@newstream.com.   CONTACT:          Newstream.com, New York                   Les Blatt, 888/560-5578                   info@newstream.com URL:              http://www.businesswire.com Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page.  Copyright (C) 2001 Business Wire.  All rights reserved.  -0-   KEYWORD:          CALIFORNIA NEW YORK INDUSTRY KEYWORD: INTERNET                   ADVISORY                   SOURCE:                   Newstream    [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***   At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition to the information regarding the company you are monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains advertisements describing products, services or companies for which we receive fees from the advertising companies. In the case of Cybertrader, distribution of this advertisement forms a component of a content exchange agreement with RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. We reserve the right to sell all or part of these shares at anytime, either before, during or after the advertisement period.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock  Quote [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Stock  Chart [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Covered  Calls  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Company  Profile [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Option  Details  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Black  - Scholes [IMAGE]     Sector/Industry Changes  Power Option PLUS Logo     [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/31/2001
10:42 AM ---------------------------
From: Mike A Roberts on 03/25/2001 03:56 PM
To: Kathie Grabstald/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: ENSIDE Draft

Please see attached for my edits

- - - Mike


...because I'm good enough, I'm smart enough and dog-gonnit people like me.

To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary
Stadler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tobin Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Congratulations

All,

Thanks for all your help the other week ... the article in the e-mail below
highlights the effect on Enron!!!!

RZ

---------------------- Forwarded by Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT on 03/26/2000 12:31
PM ---------------------------

Andrew Champion
03/27/2000 12:20 PM
To: Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ganapathy Ramesh/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Congratulations

We passed... check out this article - Ramesh pointed it out to me:

http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/000323/sc.html

"Moody's raises Enron Corp long-term debt..."

"...Stress testing and VAR calculations in the Wholesale business are
consistent on a relative scale with other commodities trading firms..."


Shirley,

Please, register me, Lance and Alex for this event.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000
04:42 PM ---------------------------

"Chris Farrell" <cfarrell@hesinet.com> on 12/22/2000 06:13:50 AM
To: <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Henwood's 2001 ERCOT Symposium: January 23, 2001

Mark Your Calendar-Tuesday January 23, 2001 Downtown Houston Hyatt Hotel

Henwood will be hosting a comprehensive ERCOT Symposium on Tuesday,  January
23, 2001. A team of Henwood regional power market specialists will be
presenting the latest analysis and
information to assist you in preparing for the new ERCOT Restructured Power
Market, in addition to an anlysis of the issues now playing out in the WSCC
markets.   Coffee and registration will
begin at 9:30 AM  and the program will run until 3:00 PM.  Lunch and snacks
will be provided.

Agenda topics include:

* What will be the critica-success factors for qualified scheduling entities
operating in ERCOT's new wholesale & retail markets?
* How will market restructuring impact mid to long-term wholesale prices?
* What is the outlook for new generation?
* What are the impacts of upcoming emission regulations on ERCOT's generation
resources?
* What are the new analytical tools available to capture market uncertainty
impacts to your supply contracts and generation assets?
* What are the restructuring lessons learned from the California experience
and the implications to ERCOT?

In conjunction with this Program, Henwood will have a demonstration room
available to present its latest software applications and e-business
solutions. A nominal $75 registration fee is required
to reserve a space in the workshop.

For more information or to reserve your spot, please contact Chris Farrell at
Henwood: cfarrell@hesinet.com or 916/569-0985.

About Henwood: Henwood offers integrated business solutions, strategic
consulting, and innovative e-Business applications to meet the challenges of
the restructured energy markets throughout
North America, Australia, and Europe, serving clients that include eight of
the ten top utilities in North America, in addition to energy services
providers and power marketers.

If you want to be removed from our email list please reply to the sender and
put "REMOVE" in the subject box.


Please, take a look at this article:

Vince


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Livia_Zufferli@Monitor.com@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 8:08 AM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:

hey there.  dad told me that you got your bonus -- congratulations!  that's
a piece of good news at least.

i got some bad news about bonuses today -- we usually get them paid out
this week, but we just got an email from our CEO saying that only a few
"exceptional performers" will get some sort of bonus but they won't
disclose the information until the end of January.  given that i have to
have a new place to live for february, i don't think that I'll be able buy
a condo anymore (the bonus money would have been for the down payment).
anyway, kind of annoying but i guess i should be grateful that i have a
job.

mom's size is large -- she's 5'4" and about 145 pounds.  could you pass
this on to jess?

by the way, our flight comes in at around 10pm on saturday, but i'll call
to confirm

livia


QB

Aaron Brooks
Brad Johnson
Jon Kitna

RB

Curtis Martin
Emmitt Smith
James Jackson
Rodney Thomas

WR

Marvin Harrison
Michael Westbrook
Marcus Robinson
Tony Martin
Plaxico Burris
Jerome Pathon

TE

Wesley Walls

PK

Matt Stover

Defenses

Baltimore

-----Original Message-----
From: Bass, Eric [<mailto:Eric.Bass@ENRON.com>]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:32 AM
To: Ames, Chuck; Baumbach, David; Bucalo, Harry; Bucalo, Harry; Hull,
Bryan; Jason Bass (E-mail); Lenhart, Matthew; Love, Phillip M.; Mathews,
Reagan; Mills, Bruce; Rabon, Chance; Winfree, O'Neal D.
Subject: rosters

nobody can do anything in the system until i have all of the rosters in
- so please send me your roster

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.

**********************************************************************


What's your title for their program?

Best,

Pat


Did we decide not to join with anyone else?

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:41 PM
To: David.Boergers@ferc.fed.us
Cc: Comnes, Alan; Steffes, James D.
Subject: FW: EL01-68-000 Request to Make a Statement
Importance: High

RE: Docket EL01-68-000  Investigation of Wholesale Rates of Public Utility Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services in the Western Systems Coordinating Council.

Dear Mr. Boergers:

Enron Power Marketing Inc. (EPMI) respectfully requests the opportunity to make a statement during the October 29, 2001 technical conference in the above-referenced proceeding.  EPMI would appreciate the opportunity to allow the following representative to make a statement on its behalf:

G. Alan Comnes,
Director, Government Affairs
Enron Corp.
121 SW Salmon Street
Portland, OR 97204
email: AComnes@enron.com
telephone: 503-464-8129

EPMI operates as a marketer of electric power and natural gas in markets throughout the Western Systems Coordinating Council (WSCC).  EPMI has been an active participant in this and related dockets and has submitted written comments pertaining to Westwide price mitigation on both May 7, 2001and August 20, 2001. In addition to identifying problems created by continued price mitigation in the WSCC, EPMI will identify problems that will be created if the Commission were to inconsistently apply price mitigation in the WSCC or make rule changes that create further uncertainty in the marketplace.   Because of EPMI's unique position as a power marketer that operates throughout the WSCC, it has a unique perspective to provide the Commission and workshop participants.

A letter making the same request, along with Mr. Comnes' credentials, will be filed with the Commission tomorrow.  If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 713-853-3180.

Sincerely,

Robert J. Frank


Media Inquiries: V*ronique Rodman 202.862.4871
Orders: 800.937.5557

FOR RELEASE: November 9, 2000

 What Happens When a Presidential Election Is Too Close to Call?
AEI's Definitive Guide to the Electoral College Explains It All

The ballots are cast and we still don't know who our next president will be.
What happens next? The answer to this question and more is in the definitive
guide to the electoral college published by the American Enterprise
Institute. After the People Vote: A Guide to the Electoral College edited by
Walter Berns (115 pages, $7.95) explains the critical workings of the
electoral college, the process of presidential succession, and the
interactions of the Constitution with federal and state statutes and party
and parliamentary rules.

In addition to the distinguished scholar Walter Berns, contributors to this
edition include Norman Ornstein (essays on disputed elections), Martin
Diamond (on the electoral college), Robert Goldwin, Michael Malbin, Thomas
Mann, Howard Penniman, Austin Ranney, and Richard M. Scammon.

To arrange an interview with Walter Berns, Norman Ornstein, or Robert
Goldwin, please contact Veronique Rodman, AEI Director of Public Affairs, at
202.862.4871.

"The authors have produced the definitive electoral college."
 Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr., Former chairman, Republican National Committee

"The United States has the world's most successful system for selecting a
chief executive. But Americans are remarkably, and dangerously, unaware of
how the electoral college came to be what it is. Hence we have long needed an
explanation of the college--its origins and evolution--as subtle and
intelligent as the college itself. That need has now been met by the book
which combines equal mastery of constitutional law and political philosophy."
 George F. Will, Columnist

 "The best single source for information on the intricacies of choosing an
American President."
 ROLLCALL

See a C-Span video of an AEI panel discussion about the electoral college at:
http://video.c-span.org:8080/ramgen/hdrive/e110100_aei.rm

Order the book at:
http://www.aei.org/shop1/shops/1/a-c.htm#0001


Mike- I have their trader coming into the office tomorrow- they are a macro
fund (they manage Harvard's endowment fund) that trades commodities- mostly
crude and metals.  I want to get them into some gas and power trades.
Specifically, I want to get them into the short Rockies trade for the summer
that we have Tudor in.

Johnny recommended I have you speak to them- can you give me a few minutes
during the day to talk to them about the west in general.

I have him in all day- we are sitting with Mike Roberts to do the weather
update from 6 am-7:30 - would be great if we could get you between 7:30 and
8:30 am.  If not, let me know when is good- Ina will know where I am

Rgds,
Caroline
cell 917-324 1999


Unfortunately, something has come up and Stan will not be able to meet Friday from 3:00-5:00.  He would like to me the morning of October 5 from 8:30-12:00 in EB 5029?  Please let me know as soon as possible if this will work.

Thanks

Tracy Geaccone

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Copeland, Erin
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 2:39 PM
To:	Stark, Cindy
Cc:	Cook, Barbara; Venable, Rachael; Petry, Norma; Walker, Blake; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	2002 Budget Review - EEOS
Importance:	High

Cindy,

The attendees from EEOS to the review with Stan, on Friday, Oct. 5th from 3:00 - 5:00p.m, are:

Brian Stanley, Keith Dodson, Blake Walker, and myself.

The meeting is to be held at EB5029.

Erin x67916


Hey buddy.  We are having all sorts of problems with St 30, 90% internal.
You should try to sell to someone else if possible.  Maybe Williams??


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron on 06/11/2002
09:47 AM ---------------------------

Mark V Walker
05/29/2002 03:51 PM
To: Joe Thorpe/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: John Nemila/EWC/Enron@Enron, Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Preliminary results from analysis of Visupro data for 5/17/02
time period that Gary Verkleeren asked about

I just noticed that I referred to month 5 in some of the dates in
memo0529AEP.   My apologies.  Below is a corrected version that replaces the
previous memo0529AEP.

Mark V Walker
05/29/2002 03:42 PM
To: Joe Thorpe/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: John Nemila/EWC/Enron@Enron, Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Preliminary results from analysis of Visupro data for 5/17/02 time
period that Gary Verkleeren asked about

Joe,
See the file Memo0529AEP.  Is there a simple explanation for why the system
OK counter continued to increment 44.7 hrs when the turbine blades were
pitched out to 80 degrees?   The turbine was not powered down, put in
maintenance, put in repair, or faulted off.   I talked to the controller
people and the attached memo are the only commands other than manual pause
that will cause this.  They sent me the file I stored as PausingCauses.  Call
me at 6753 if you need any further info.

Please call me with your thoughts on this & I will finish a writeup for Gary
Verkleeren.      Our group is working on an improved capability to detect
periods of long pausing.   However, until the data recovery of Statdat files
improves this new capability may not be consistently reliable or timely.


HERE are the good parts:

CMUA asks FERC to order quick release of bid and other inf to the market
participants; cites Australian rules, England & Wales, and Alberta --
Miracles do happen!

Opposes 5% deviation band for underschedu;ing -- recommends a fixed band with
a minimum of 2 MW for "smaller" SCs
As an alternative -- asks for an 8% band. Does not address the pplication to
generation.

The bad parts:

Thinks the Governor should appoint three of the Board members and the other
three should be appointed by the WSCC Board of Trustees. (the ISO CEO makes
the 7th) Wants the Board to report back after 2 years to see how RTOS might
fit in in CA.

Still wants to return to cost-of-service rates.

Opposes opportunity costs as factor in evaluating bids above $250

Wants costs allocated properly -- in other words re-allocated away from the
munis.


Here are the FT Positions.  Let me know how they look.

Thanks,
Robin


Here we go (?)

Calif Small Generator:To Sign SoCal Ed Bankruptcy Filing
By Mark Golden

03/15/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- One of California's small independent electricity
producers, Coram Energy Group Ltd., will sign an involuntary bankruptcy
petition Thursday against Edison International (EIX) unit Southern California
Edison, the owner of the company said.

The petition is being circulated to five other companies and lists the amount
of money each is owed by the utility, Coram's Brian O'Sullivan told Dow Jones
Newswires. O'Sullivan wouldn't name the other companies on the petition, but
said that they are all "qualifying facilities" as the small generating plants
are called.

The petition, known as a Form 5, could be filed in U.S. bankruptcy court in
Los Angeles as soon as next week, O'Sullivan said.

"I would have liked to have done it myself some time ago, but I couldn't do
it on my own," said O'Sullivan, who received the papers for signing
Wednesday. "(The) planets are in line for this to be filed in court. They
would have to be knocked out of line somehow for this not to be filed."

O'Sullivan said he would have preferred not to pursue a bankruptcy
proceeding, but is running out of cash and will have to shut down his
operations in about a month. That situation, combined with the stalling of
legislation in the California Senate to deal with the qualifying facilities,
have left O'Sullivan with no other option, he said.

Qualifying facilities, from which U.S. utilities have had to buy power since
the 1970s under federal law, supply California with almost 30% of its power.
Southern California Edison hasn't paid these producers for months.

FPL Group (FPL), which owns several qualifying facilities in SCE's territory,
also may join the group to initiate involuntary bankruptcy proceedings.

"We are considering it, but haven't made a determination of whether we would
join such a petition," said FPL spokeswoman Carol Klaussen. "It's extremely
frustrating to us. We continue to supply electricity to the people of
California, but we haven't been paid since November."

As reported, California Assemblyman Fred Keely, D-Boulder Creek, said
legislation to restructure the rates qualifying facilities charge utilities
for electricity is unlikely to be passed by the state's Legislature. Keely,
who is Assembly speaker pro tem and a co-sponsor of the measure, SB47X, said
the bill is still being heard in the Senate's Energy Committee, but the
committee's chairwoman, Sen. Debra Bowen, has no intention of taking up the
bill any time soon, an aide in her office said.

The stalled legislation would reduce the rates charged by the state's
qualifying facilities to about 8 cents a kilowatt-hour from the 17 cents a
kilowatt-hour they've charged over the past few months. It would also
establish a schedule of payments the utilities must make to the qualifying
facilities. The small generators are owed a combined $1 billion from Southern
California Edison and PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit Pacific Gas & Electric.

O'Sullivan said that his and several other companies can't wait any longer.

"From the beginning, I've been hearing, 'Oh, you guys won't start a
bankruptcy proceeding.' And we didn't do it, because SB47x, we were told,
would solve our problem. It was a good faith attempt by us to be part of the
solution," he said. "Why Bowen stopped it, I don't know."

Southern California Edison owes Coram $350,000, O'Sullivan said. He's got
$41,000 in the bank, and has stopped paying most of his bills with the
exception of salaries for his seven staff members and several other
absolutely necessary payments.

"That leaves me with about a month of cash," he said.

But his legal fees would quickly have surpassed the amount he is owed if he
were to have taken the utility to court alone.

"I've got to join with someone who is significantly larger than me," he said.
"That opportunity has arisen."

O'Sullivan wouldn't name the larger company, which he said will make the
final decision about when and if to bring involuntary bankruptcy proceedings
against Southern California Edison.

"This could be the biggest bankruptcy in U.S. history, and you can't do it
without spending the next couple of years in court," O'Sullivan said. "This
is not anything I want to do, but I don't have any choice."

-By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com

(Jason Leopold in Los Angeles contributed to this article.)

An Edison International spokesman declined to comment specifically on the
petition, as the company hadn't seen it. But he said Edison still aims to
avoid bankruptcy and plans to pay its bills once it's able to do so.

"We're doing our best to avoid bankruptcy," the spokesman said. "We don't
believe bankruptcy serves anyone's purposes. We fully intend to pay our bills
once this situation is resolved."

-By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com

(Jason Leopold in Los Angeles contributed to this article.)

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Start Date: 4/7/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040707.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 7 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DANTE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 12/14/99 08:03
AM ---------------------------

"D.Michael Gioffre, DDS" <dgioffre@hotmail.com> on 12/13/99 05:41:38 PM
To: Aukhound@aol.com, dukern8@gateway.net, dmill002@hotmail.com, Benjamin
Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT, miorii@aol.com, apizzi72@yahoo.com,
christopher.pushaw@yale.edu
cc:
Subject:

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
 - comics.htm


that is some funny shit. how did you make out on saturday? I bailed and went home. we are going to hit the whiskey on saturday. should be good. talk to you later.

chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Zureski, Max (CA - Calgary)" <mzureski@deloitte.ca>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, January 18, 2002 9:14 AM
To:	Donegan, Kevin (CA - Calgary); Brownell, Rory (CA - Calgary); 'craig.fisher@atcomidstream.com'; 'darin.olson@dynegy.com'; Dorland, Chris; 'maengelhardt@collinsbarrow.com'; Koller, Rob (CA - Calgary); Hyman, David (CA - Calgary); Baker, Jason (CA - Calgary); 'paigegirl_c@hotmail.com'; Clements, Colin (CA - Calgary); 'gpw2002@hotmail.com'; 'michelle.podavin@sait.ab.ca'; 'Jeff Schoenhals'; 'Stacey Green'; 'kbibby@shaw.ca'; Heit, Doran (CA - Calgary); 'tmitzel@cdnx.ca'; Lyons, Jeff (CA - Calgary)
Subject:

Check this out http://www.siccoproductionz.com/delta.html << File: http://www.siccoproductionz.com/delta.html >>


Stan:

I spoke to Mike Miller regarding the opportunity in Enron Wind.  He is interested in the position and would be willing to meet with you as early as next Monday.  Mike can be reached at x36556 or his cell (713) 628-5958. Hope this helps.

Kevin


----- Forwarded by Ann Ballard/Corp/Enron on 08/09/2000 03:49 PM -----

	Linda S Trevino
	08/09/2000 12:36 PM

		 To: nimus@velaw.com
		 cc: aballar@enron.com, Carol Essig/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: HSR-2008.form

Per Carol Essig's instructions, attached is a copy of the HSR form for
Northern Border Partners, L.P.


[IMAGE] Forums Discuss these points in the Forums:  Forexnews Forum       Technicals Live Charts Analysis available from: Cornelius Luca   J.P. Chorek   Technical Research Ltd.   Charts & News featuring Standard & Poor's        Interest Rates  US: Japan: Eurozone: UK: Switzerland:   1.75%  0.15%  3.25%  4.0%  1.25-2.25%        [IMAGE]   	 [IMAGE]  FX Market Sees Green Light to Sell Yen January 22, 7:00 AM: EUR/$..0.8835 $/JPY..134.15 GBP/$..1.4270 $/CHF..1.6625  FX Market Sees Green Light to Sell Yen by Jes Black  At 10:00:00 AM US Dec Leading Indic. (exp 0.7%, prev 0.5%) At 2:00:00 PM US Dec Fed. Budget (exp 24 bln, prev -54.3 bln)  The yen crumbled to a new 3-year low of 134.33 after US Treasury Secretary O'Neill refused to engage in a "weak yen" debate but agreed that markets should set FX rates. Traders feared O'Neill would show some apprehension as to the yen's sharp slide. Instead, his remarks were seen as still backing the strong dollar policy and taken implicitly that the yen should be allowed to fall. However, O'Neill also pointed out that a competitive devaluation would not fix Japan's non-performing loan problem or improve productivity. Moreover, the US is only likely to support yen weakness if it means Japan forces banks to dump bad loans, accelerates structural reforms and deregulates the markets, like the US has done.  Yet tolerance of a weaker yen is seen giving traders the green light to sell it towards 135 in the near term. USD/JPY rose as high as 134.33 and if the pair can hold above 134.00, technically, the dollar will target 135.00 in the near term. Support is seen at 133.80 followed by 133.30 and 132.80. EUR/JPY also hit a fresh 1-week high of 118.73 after hitting a 7-day low of 115.55 last Tuesday. Support is seen at 118.12, which marks the 61.8% retracement from the January 2 high of 119.71 to last week's low of 115.55. Follow up support is seen around 117.40, 116.50 and 116.00.   The euro/yen cross was bolstered by gains in dollar/yen but the euro continued to show weakness against the dollar after again failing to break resistance at 88.50. EUR/USD rose to a session high of 88.52 but quickly pared those gains and fell back to 88.35. Support is seen at 88.15 followed by 87.90 and key support at 87.50, which marks the 31.8% Fibonacci retracement of the move from 82.25 to 95.96. Resistance is seen at 88.50 followed by 89.10, which marks the 50% Fibonacci retracement of the same move. Yet, only a move back above 89.50 would give any hope of a near term recovery as temporary moves higher are not seen by the market as indicating strength given the euro's difficulty to remain above 90-cents.  Limiting the euro's losses to the dollar were strong gains against the pound following overnight comments from Bank of England Director for Europe, John Townend, who said the pound was clearly overvalued against the euro and would almost certainly need to weaken if the UK were to join the EMU. EUR/GBP rose half a pence to a day's high of 61.90.  However, any artificial lowering of the rate would step up inflationary pressures for the U.K., cautioned Townend, who would like to see EUR/GBP rise, but sterling remain stable vs the dollar. Townend also noted that the U.K. government wont likely assess joining the euro until June 2003.  GBP/USD fell through support at 1.4330 and 1.4300 to a 5-day low of 1.4278. Cable support is now seen at 1.4270, the 61.8% retracement of the move from 1.4060 to 1.4606. Resistance is seen at 1.4300, 1.4330, 1.4350.  For the US session today, earnings will be the focus after traders return from a 3 day weekend. The markets will have to assess over 500 company earnings reports this week, with nearly one in three companies on the S?500 scheduled to report on Tuesday alone. Again, Wall Street is likely to pay more attention to the foreward outlook after already pricing in dismal Q4 figures. Companies due to report are Merck, Motorola, Amazon, Merrill Lynch, Johnson & Johnson, Boeing and Lucent.  Today's key economic data is the leading indicators index for December, which is expected to rise 0.7% after it surprised on the upside last month with a 0.5% gain.  The other main event this week is Fed Chairman Greenspan's speech before the Senate Budget Committee on Thursday. Market sentiment now believes Greenspan probably sounded more pessimistic than he intended in his speech on January 11. Therefore, the market is anticipating a more upbeat tone tomorrow about prospects for economic recovery. Interest rate futures are pricing in less than a 30% chance of a rate cut at the Jan 30 meeting, leaving the majority to believe rates will hold steady at 1.75%, a 40-year low. However, since the dollar index is trading near 6-month highs, most dealers are now divided over whether a further rate cut would help the dollar.     	[IMAGE] Audio Mkt. Analysis Quiet Market Awaits Data, USD Talk        Articles & Ideas  Philly Fed-Supported Optimism   EUR/USD: Technical Analysis       Articles & Ideas Forex Glossary   Economic Indicators   Forex Guides   Link Library      [IMAGE]
		[IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE]
		 This e-mail is never sent unsolicited. If you wish to unsubscribe from this or any other Forexnews.com newsletters, please click here .  Any opinions expressed by representatives of Forexnews.com or its affiliates as to the commentary, market information, and future direction of prices of specific currencies reflect the views of the individual analyst, and do not necessarily represent the views of Forexnews.com or its affiliates in any way. In no event shall Forexnews.com or its affiliates have any liability for any losses incurred in connection with any decision made, action or inaction taken by any party in reliance upon the information provided in this material; or in any delays, inaccuracies, errors in, or omissions of information.


Just so you know - we (me, barry, stephanie, Mark Whitt, and lucci) met lars ulrich and went to a party with him Monday night.  hot tubs were involved.  We breifly thought about you -

kim


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000 12:16 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Leigh Miller" <LMiller@eei.org>                           11/08/2000
08:55 AM

To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: Overview of NERC's Reliability Assessment 2000-2009

An overview of NERC's Reliability Assessment 2000-2009
      ,Copyright 2000 EEI. All rights reserved.

EEI's State Restructuring Service is proud to present an Internet E-Forum
providing an overview of the North American Electric Reliability Council's
(NERC) recently released Reliability Assessment 2000-2009, the reliability of
bulk electric systems in North America.

The reliability of the electric generation and transmission systems serving
North America has come under increased federal government, state regulator,
and customer scrutiny. Generation capacity margins have decreased and the
bulk electric systems are subjected to flows in magnitudes and directions not
contemplated when they were designed or for which there is minimal operating
experience.

Each year, the Reliability Assessment Subcommittee (RAS) of the North
American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) reviews the overall reliability
of existing and planned electric generation and transmission systems in North
America. This year's Reliability Assessment 2000-2009 report presents:

*An assessment of electric generation and transmission reliability through
2009

*An assessment of the generation resource adequacy of each Interconnection in
North America

*A discussion of key issues affecting reliability of future electric supply

*Regional assessments of electric supply reliability, including issues of
specific Regional concern

Presenting an overview of this year's Reliability Assessment is Frank J.
Koza, Jr., Chairman, Reliability Assessment Subcommittee, and General
Manager, Ventures, PECO Energy Company.

Our guest moderator is Tim Gallagher, Mgr Technical Services, NERC

To provide questions and commentary we have Jolly Hayden, Vice President of
Transmission, Dynegy

A copy of the Reliability Assessment 2000-2009 is available from the NERC web
site at http://www.nerc.com/~pc/syscond.html.

November 21, 2000 1 p.m. ET
Note: Please block a 2-hour time slot for the E-Forum. We expect the program
to take about one hour. Q&A at the conclusion of the E-Forum could take up to
an additional hour.

Registration Cut-off and Cancellation Policy: All registrations must be
received by November 17, 2000. Substitutions may be made at any time,
however, no refunds will be made for cancellations received after November
17, 2000.

Registration Cost:
EEI/NARUC/NCSL Members: $50.00 / Associates $75 / Non-members: $100.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
FOR MORE INFORMATION AND/OR TO REGISTER, ACCESS THE FOLLOWING URL:
www.eei.org/resources/meetings/forums/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
E-Forums are real-time, interactive presentations, created, produced and
distributed by EEI. The visual presentation is delivered over the Internet,
while the audio portion is delivered through a conference phone call. You can
participate in an E-Forum using any computer with Internet access and a
telephone.

To fully participate in the E-Forum, you will need:

- Access to the Internet and a web browser.
- A separate voice phone line and a phone to dial into the audio conference
call. Cell phones can be used.
- Upon confirmation of your registration, you will be given complete
instructions including the URL (with Password/ID) and a the conference phone
number.
- Slides used in the presentation will also be e-mailed to you prior to the
forum and will soon be available over the Internet.

For more information on EEI's E-Forums, contact Mike Oldak, Director, State
Competitive and Regulatory Policy at 202-508-5523 moldak@eei.org or Leigh
Miller, Coordinator at (202) 508-5522 lmiller@eei.org

For more information on EEI's State Restructuring Service, contact Norm
Jenks, Manager, Regulation and Competitive Analysis 202-508-5533
njenks@eei.org

,Copyright 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute
All rights reserved under U.S. and foreign law, treaties and conventions. No
part of this work may be distributed, redistributed, reproduced or copied in
any form or by any means - graphic, electronic or mechanical, including
photocopying, recording, taping, or information storage and retrieval systems
without written permission of the publisher.


I thought that the recruiting championship was the only one that mattered.

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Very Interesting


Following is the list of responsibilities created in the meeting this afternoon.

Sent on behalf of Julia Murray
Carolyn George
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Enron Wholesale Services
Enron Industrial Markets
1400 Smith, ECS04723
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-3439   Fax: (713) 646-3393
email:  carolyn.george@enron.com


Hi Folks, here we go for week 13.? This early  in the week, there are still
lots of questions of course. For players in doubt  with injuries, our
rankings reflect our best guess based on the info  available.
?
Good luck this week and I hope the bounces go your  way.
?
Joe
?
?
Quarterbacks:
?

1. Culpepper, Min

2. Green, StL

3. Frerotte, Den

4. Gannon, Oak

5. Favre, GB

6. Manning, Ind

7. Grbac, KC

8. McNair, Ten

9. George, Was

10. Dilfer, Bal

11. Testaverde, NYJ

12. Huard, Sea

13. Beuerlein, Car

14. Batch, Det

15. Brunell, Jac

16. McNabb, Phi

17. Collins, NYG

18. Johnson, Buf

19. Aikman, Dal

20. Fiedler, Mia

21. Brooks, NO

22. Stewart, Pit

23. Bledsoe, NE

24. King, TB

25. Chandler, Atl

Running Backs:?

1. Smith, Min

2. Lewis, Bal

3. Faulk, Stl

4. Bettis, Pit

5. James, Ind

6. George, Ten

7. Taylor, Jac

8. Smith, Dal

9. Davis, Was

10. Stewart, Det

11. Watters, Sea

12. Green, GB

13. Anderson, Den

14. Anderson, Atl

15. Martin, NYJ

16. Dillon, Cin

17. Smith, Mia

18. Dayne, NYG

19. Barber, NYG

20. Allen, Chi

21. Dunn, TB

22. Fazande, SD

23. Pittman, Ari

24. Redmond, NE

25. Autry, Phi

26. Crockett, Oak

27. Morton, NO

28. Kaufman, Oak

29. Biakabutuka, Car

30. Warren, Dal

31. Davis, Den

32. Parmalee, NYJ

33. Morris, Buf

34. Richardson, KC

35. Holmes, Bal

36. Anderson, NYJ

37. Prentice, Cle

38. Fletcher, SD

39. Huntley, Pit

40. Allen, NO

41. Hoover, Car

42. Pritchett, Phi

43. Jones, Ari

44. Watson, StL

45. Anders, KC

Wide Receivers:

1. Moss, Min

2. Bruce, StL

3. Harrison, Ind

4. Alexander, KC

5. Brown, Oak

6. Smith, Den

7. Smith, Jac

8. Robinson, Chi

9. Carter, Min

10. McCaffrey, Den

11. Freeman, GB

12. Muhammad, Car

13. Horn, NO

14. Moulds, Buf

15. Ismail, Bal

16. Johnson, TB

17. Chrebet, NYJ

18. Mason, Ten

19. Glenn, NE

20. Connell, Was

21. Holt, StL

22. Dawkins, Sea

23. Moore, Det

24. McKnight, Dal

25. Toomer, NYG

26. Schroeder, GB

27. Hayes, Car

28. Mathis, Atl

29. Green, TB

30. Graham, SD

31. Boston, Ari

32. McCardell, Jac

33. Morton, Det

34. Johnson, Phi

35. Thrash, Was

36. Morris, KC

37. Gadsden, Mia

38. Johnson, Cle

39. Ward, Pit

40. Conway, SD

41. Warrick, Cin

42. Rison, Oak

43. Brown, NE

44. Jackson, NO

45. Jurevicius, NYG

46. Sanders, Ari

47. Hakim, StL

48. Dwight, Atl

49. Pathon, Ind

50. Kennison, Chi

Tight Ends:

1. Sharpe, Bal

2. Gonzalez, KC

3. Jones, SD

4. Riemersma, Buf

5. Wycheck, Ten

6. Dudley, Oak

7. Carswell, Den

8. Lewis, Phi

9. Williams, StL

10. Brady, Jac

11. Franks, GB

12. Dilger, Ind

13. Harris, Dal

14. Pollard, Ind

15. Fauria, Sea

16. Alexander, Was

17. Sloan, Det

18. Becht, NYJ

19. Mitchell, NYG

20. Glover, NO

21. Moore, TB

22. Davis, Min

23. Rutledge, NE

24. McGee, Cin

25. Kelly, Atl

Kickers:

1. Stover, Bal

2. Elam, Den

3. Vanderjagt, Ind

4. Anderson, Min

5. Longwell, GB

6. Janikowski, Oak

7. Hanson, Det

8. Mare, Mia

9. Grammatica, TB

10. Nedney, Car

11. Del Greco, Ten

12. Murray, Was

13. Hollis, Jac

14. Brown, Pit

15. Hall, StL

16. Akers, Phi

17. Hall, NYJ

18. Christie, Buf

19. Lindell, Sea

20. Peterson, KC

21. Seder, Dal

22. Vinatieri, NE

23. Daluiso, NYG

24. Brien, NO

25. Andersen, Atl

Defenses:

1. Baltimore

2. Oakland

3. Pittsburgh

4. Tennessee

5. Kansas  City

6. Washington

7. Tampa Bay

8. Detroit

9. Miami

10.  Philadelphia

11. Minnesota

12. Buffalo

13. Denver

14. New York  Jets

15. Green Bay

16. New York  Giants

17. St. Louis

18.  Jacksonville

19. New  Orleans

20. New  England

21.  Indianapolis

22. Chicago

23. Seattle

24. Carolina

25. San  Diego

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com


Paul,

Sullivan&Cromwell faxed their comments on the Quick Start Guide. I'll talk
them over with Justin and e-mail you the final version with both Justin's and
S&C changes.
Elena

---------------------- Forwarded by Elena Kapralova/LON/ECT on 13/09/99 09:39
---------------------------

Justin Boyd
10/09/99 17:46
To: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, gilbergd@sullcrom.com, Paul
Goddard/LON/ECT@ECT, Elena Kapralova/LON/ECT@ECT, Rahil Jafry/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Getting started guide

Dear Louise,

Here is our marked-up text of the Quick Start Guide.

Justin/Edmund

Louise Kitchen
10/09/99 05:47
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
gilbergd@sullcrom.com, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Goddard/LON/ECT@ECT, Elena Kapralova/LON/ECT@ECT, Rahil
Jafry/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Getting started guide

Please come back with comments on this document by the end of play Friday, we
are going to use this document to send to customers with their passwords
(once they have signed the password application agreement.

Sorry about the rush but we are moving pretty quickly now.

Graphics need to format but content is what I need you to look at.

Louise


I agree.  My notebook shows ENA selling 2/Month APR - JUL Nymex @ 5.28.

- Andy


We're engaged...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:01 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: California Update--10.02.01:  PUC Turns Down Davis' Proposed Rate Agreement with DWR

What have you done with Loretta?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:45 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Belden, Tim; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Comnes, Alan; Tribolet, Michael; Walsh, Kristin; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Frazier, Lamar; Keeney, Kevin; Gahn, Scott; Swain, Steve; Lavorato, John; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Calger, Christopher F.; Mara, Susan; Black, Don; Richter, Jeff; Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Mara, Susan; Robertson, Linda; Kingerski, Harry; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Shapiro, Richard; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; Higgason, Kelly; Whalley, Greg; Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject:	California Update--10.02.01:  PUC Turns Down Davis' Proposed Rate Agreement with DWR

In what will likely be viewed as a fairly shocking event, the California PUC today voted down Davis' proposed rate agreement between DWR and the CPUC.
The vote was 4-1, with the two Republicans voting with Davis' hand-picked appointees Lynch and Wood.
Davis' proposal was introduced at the meeting by another Davis appointee--Geoff Brown--who made a lengthy speech about why California would experience economic and political destruction if the PUC did not approve Davis' proposed rate agreement.

What is Davis' proposed rate agreement between DWR and the CPUC?
It would remove all PUC authority to review any contracts between DWR with suppliers.
It would require the PUC to pass through to utility rates all DWR power contract costs, no questions asked.

What are the implications of the move by the PUC to reject Davis' proposal?
With the vote, it remains unclear how California/DWR will pay for the DWR power contracts.
The political pressure to re-negotiate--or break--the DWR power contracts is likely to intensify considerably.
It remains unclear how California/DWR will pay for the $12.5 B in bonds the Treasurer has unsuccessfully attempted to issue for past several months.
Under the structure devised by Davis, the revenues flowing from the CPUC/DWR rate agreement would be used to both 1) pay for the DWR power contracts and 2) service the bonds the Treasurer is trying to issue to repay California's General Fund for spot and other short term power purchased by DWR since January.
In short, there is no clear indication of how California will pay for DWR contracts or issue the bonds.
Safe to say that today's PUC vote has seriously embarrassed Davis, and left his approach to "solving" California electricity crisis in shambles.

What Next?
A broad left-right coalition of energy interests supported a bill (18XX) that passed the Legislature with broad bi-partisan support.
The bill would create a "dedicated rate component" on every customers bill to service the $12.5 B in bonds that the Treasurer wants to issue.
Proponents of the bill--and just about everyone else--argue that the "dedicated rate component" is a signficantly more efficient way to raise the debt California needs to plug the hole in its budget.
The bill is silent, however, on how California would pay for the DWR contracts, and the bill's opponents claim that the power suppliers will sue as a result.
All four PUC commissioners who voted against the Davis rate agreement today urged Davis to sign the bill.  The left-right coalition (from Nader types to oil companies) is also working hard to get Davis to sign it.
Davis has said that he will veto the bill on the advice of the Treasurer and bond counsel.
Given today's vote, however, Davis may have no alternative than to sign the bill if he wants to get the bonds issued and the state budget repaid.

Update on Edison Bailout
Still appears that chances are very small that Edison and Davis will succeed in getting the Legislature to vote for an Edison bailout when it returns for another "special" session next Tuesday.

If you have any questions, just let us know.

Best,
Jeff


Erin, thank you very much for your assistance in this effort.  We appreciate your
	quick turnaround.  Thanks. Lynn

	Lynn Blair
	Northern Natural Gas Co.
	Gas Logistics
	Phone: 	(713) 853-7637.
	Fax:	(713) 646-8000

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Robinson, Erin" <Erin.Robinson@Williams.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:34 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn
Cc:	McDaniels, Steve (EM&T Gas Accounting)
Subject:	11-01 payment

Lynn,
I have confirmed with TGPL that the $490,440.00 payment should be wired to you tomorrow.  Please let me know if you have any other questions.
Thanks, Erin
Erin Robinson
Williams Energy, Marketing & Trading
Gas & Power Operations Accounting
Phone:  (918) 573-5445
Fax:  (918) 573-1965


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: John  . Brindle
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: JB011
Report Total: $396.10
Amount Due Employee: $396.10

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001
12:21 PM ---------------------------

FAP <FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu> on 01/23/2001 11:21:10 AM
To: Clay DeGiacinto <clayton.degiacinto.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>, Deepa Mallik
<mallikd@wharton.upenn.edu>, Dennis Feerick
<Dennis.Feerick.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>, Edson Otani
<edsono@wharton.upenn.edu>, Gustavo Palazzi <gustavop@wharton.upenn.edu>,
"Heather N. Thorne (E-mail)" <hethorne@wharton.upenn.edu>, Jack Rejtman
<Jack.Rejtman.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>, Jaideep Singh
<singhjai@wharton.upenn.edu>, Jason Cummins
<Marc.Cummins.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>, Joshua Leventhal
<levent86@wharton.upenn.edu>, Kim Whitsel <whitselk@wharton.upenn.edu>,
"LOUIS A THOMAS (E-mail)" <thomas@wharton.upenn.edu>, Murat Camoglu
<camoglum@wharton.upenn.edu>, Nick Levitt
<Nicholas.Levitt.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>, Omar Bassel
<bassalo@wharton.upenn.edu>, Pat Henahan <mhenahan@wharton.upenn.edu>, Ram
Vittal <mvittal@wharton.upenn.edu>, Steve Lessar
<Stephen.Lessar.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>, Tulika Bhalla
<bhallat@wharton.upenn.edu>, Vincent Chen
<Vincent.Chen.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>
cc: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>, "'christie.patrick@enron.com'"
<christie.patrick@enron.com>, FAP  <FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu>
Subject: videoconferences w/ Enron

Team and Host:

I have set up the following dates/times for videoconferences.
Unfortunately, 4:00-6:00 was not available, so I arranged for 4:30-6:30pm on
the following dates. I hope this does not cause anyone inconvenience, but I
took time and space that was available.

Note:  I did not schedule during Interview week, Finals week or Spring
Break.

1/25   SHDH 1203
2/1     SHDH 1203
2/15   SHDH 1203
3/1     SHDH 215
3/22   SHDH 215
3/29   SHDH 215

Any questions, please contact the FAP office.

Donna Piazze
Program Director
Field Application Project
The Wharton School
Univ. of Pennsylvania
215.573.8394   fax 215.573.5727
fap@management.wharton.upenn.edu
piazze@wharton.upenn.edu


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000 01:12
PM ---------------------------
   Michele Winckowski @ ENRON                10/02/2000 02:04 PM

To:
cc:  (bcc: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Fwd: FW: Montana Forest Fire picture

Subj:    Montana Forest Fire picture
This is awsome and at the same time rather chilling.  Mother nature is
spectacular
This awesome picture was taken in the Bitterroot National Forest here in
Montana on August 6, 2000 by a fire behavior analyst from Fairbanks,
Alaska by the name of John McColgan with a Digital camera.  Since he was
working while he took the picture, he cannot sell or profit from it so he
should
at least be recognized as the photographer of this once in a lifetime
shot

 - ATT09176.jpg