---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
09:22 AM ---------------------------

Mary Hain
11/28/2000 08:41 AM
To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe@ECT, Sean
Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lester Rawson/PDX/ECT@ECT,
John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Mark Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dave Parquet, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Duke Energy Proposes to Manage All of SDG&E's Electricity Needs For
Next Five Years at Low Fixed Pri

Monday November 27, 2:19 pm Eastern Time

Press Release

SOURCE: Duke Energy Corporation

Duke Energy Proposes to Manage All of SDG&E's Electricity Needs For Next Five
Years at Low Fixed Price

MORRO BAY, Calif., Nov. 27 /PRNewswire/ -- Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK - news),
through its business unit Duke Energy North America (DENA), has put forth
another bold solution to California's electricity crisis by proposing to
manage San Diego Gas & Electric's (SDG&E) 3,300-megawatt electricity load at
a fixed price of 6 cents per kilowatt-hour for the next five years. This
proposal is based on market prices for electricity and natural gas as of Nov.
17, 2000.

DENA's proposal, which takes into account SDG&E's seasonal and hourly load
requirements and has a 3-percent annual adjustment for inflation, was
included in comments DENA submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission last week in response to the commission's proposed remedies for
California's electricity market.

Under DENA's proposal, SDG&E's business and residential customers no longer
would be exposed to the electricity price spikes they experienced this past
summer when their retail electricity prices often exceeded 18 cents per
kilowatt-hour.

``The 3,300 megawatts represent the full electricity load SDG&E needs to
serve its retail customer base during the hottest summer day,'' said Jeff
Stokes, DENA executive vice president for the Western region. ``We again have
stepped up with tangible, market-based solutions that can be implemented to
address the San Diego area's electricity price spikes. In addition to
stabilizing customers' power bills, our proposal would also eliminate SDG&E's
exposure to high wholesale electricity prices and the financial uncertainty
that goes along with that exposure.''

California is facing high wholesale electricity prices largely because of
supply and demand imbalance, which has caused the California Independent
System Operator (Cal-ISO) to call an unprecedented 20 ``Stage Two Electrical
Emergencies'' thus far in 2000 when available electricity supplies have
fallen below 5 percent. The primary causes for the electricity supply
shortfall are the state's economic growth, the lack of new power plants being
built in California over the past decade, an aging generation fleet that
requires more maintenance and electricity imports being less available due to
economic growth throughout the West. California's electricity supply and
demand imbalance is expected to worsen or show little improvement until the
summers of 2002 and 2003, which is the earliest a substantial amount of new,
more efficient and cleaner power plants can be brought on line.

``This is another key market-based solution to California's electricity
crisis made by Duke Energy over the past four months and we hope that it is
given serious consideration,'' said Bill Hall, DENA vice president of asset
management for the Western region. ``The competitive wholesale electricity
markets did not cause this electricity crisis; but with patience, wisdom and
bold behavior by all market participants, we can fix the crisis and not
burden the state's electricity ratepayers or taxpayers.''

DENA has taken the following steps recently to address California's
electricity shortfall and high prices:

    * On Nov. 16, DENA broke ground on its $525-million modernization of Moss
      Landing Power Plant in Monterey County to upgrade the existing plant and
      add 1,060 megawatts of new capacity to the site's current 1,500
      megawatts.  When the modernization is completed, the plant will be
      California's largest.  The project represents a substantial portion of
      the new generation scheduled to come on line in California during summer
      2002.

    * On Nov. 15, DENA signed a wholesale electricity contract with Southern
      California Edison to help manage price volatility and prevent price
      spikes for their retail customers.  This followed a similar contract
      that was signed with Pacific Gas & Electric on Oct. 30.  The specific
      prices of the contracts are proprietary.

    * On Oct. 23, DENA refiled with the California Energy Commission its
      2,500-page application for certification to modernize the 1,000-megawatt
      Morro Bay Power Plant.  The new 1,200-megawatt facility represents a
      $600-million investment.  If the certification is received, DENA expects
      to bring the new plant on line by summer 2003 and demolish the existing
      plant by 2007.

    * Finally, DENA has begun to work with City of Chula Vista officials to
      accelerate the schedule for replacing the South Bay Power Plant with a
      cleaner and more efficient facility.  Existing plans call for the plant
      to be replaced in 2009.

For more information about DENA's California operations, power plant
modernization plans and position on California's electricity crisis, see the
Web site www.duke-energy.com/California.

DENA is a leading wholesale energy services company. DENA and its affiliates
including Duke Energy Trading and Marketing provide natural gas and power
supply and services and risk management products to wholesale energy
producers and users. DENA also develops, owns and manages a portfolio of
merchant generation facilities. DENA is a wholly owned subsidiary of Duke
Energy.

Duke Energy, a diversified multinational energy company, creates value for
customers and shareholders through an integrated network of energy assets and
expertise. Duke Energy manages a dynamic portfolio of natural gas and
electric supply, delivery and trading businesses -- generating revenues of
nearly $22 billion in 1999. Duke Energy, headquartered in Charlotte, N.C., is
a Fortune 100 company traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
DUK. More information about the company is available on the Internet at:
www.duke-energy.com.

    CONTACT:  Tom Williams of Duke Energy Corporation, 805-595-4270, or
              pager, 877-364-5170

SOURCE: Duke Energy Corporation


sounds good!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Allan, David
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:34 AM
To:	Causholli, Monika
Subject:	RE: Abitibi-Pulp usage

Thanks, I'll look it over. Let's meet after the Yak game.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Causholli, Monika
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 7:44 AM
To:	Allan, David
Subject:	Abitibi-Pulp usage

Dave,

Attached is the spreadsheet with the Abitibi paper mills and their pulp usage. Let me know when we can meet.

Monika << File: Abitibi.xls >>


Hope you had a good vacation.  Thanks for forwarding all of my mail.  Now that I've been migrated to Outlook it may actually get worse instead of better.  My assistant is trying to see if there isn't something the IT people can do.


Bob

Thanks.  It seems to me that:

the broker acts as principal and must itself be EOL pre-approved
the broker will seek to novate the trade to the specified counterparty (who
must be EOL pre-approved in relation to the underlying product)
on novation (if at all), the broker is released as principal and the
specified counterparty is substituted therefor
if no novation occurs, the broker is liable as principal and any cash-out
should be calculated on market-based principles

Justin

To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita
Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Broker Client Process flow

Justin please see my comments in red below.  You probably need to have a
conversation with Mark Taylor to flush out details of the broker customer
relationship.

Justin Boyd
11/01/2000 02:50 AM
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita
Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Broker Client Process flow

Bob,

Thanks for these.  My comments/questions were:

What is the rationale for requiring margin from the broker, given its role as
agent for the client?  What if the client refuses to accept/acknowledge the
trade - I assume the agent is nonetheless liable?  The margin will secure the
risk between treansaction and confirmation with the counterparty.  the broker
will pay liquidated damages if counterparty does not accept the trade.  (risk
is essentially 1-3 days)

I assume we will negotiate a fully-fledged agreement with each broker,
covering all the usual protections for Enron (indemnities/right of agent to
bind its principal/reps and warranties/duties & obligations of
agent/liability of agent/margin arrangements)  Yes.  Mark Taylor is drafting
the agreement.  the agreement will lay out the margin requirements,
liquidated damages, etc.  I am not sure that the broker is acting as a agent
for the customer as the customer may not even know that the broker is
transacting on EnronOnline.

I assume that the client will be an approved EOL counterparty with trading
access for the particular product Not neccesarily.  the customer must however
have a profile set up in enronOnline and must have a credit headroom in
EnronOnline.  We can potentially paper the transaction under normal OTC
process.

We will need to ensure that the client agrees to be bound by each trade
concluded through the agent, notwithstanding the intermediation of the agent
(it would seem to me that we should create special ETAs/PAs for this purpose
- e.g. each trade is effected by the "click" of the agent, not the client;
the ETA does not contemplate intermediation; the PA relates to the use of
passwords by a principal and not its agent)  Mark is also drafting a BTA
(broker transaction agreement.  Once again the broker is not acting as agent
rather they will release the rights and obligations under the transaction to
the counterparty.

The agent will, in its terms of business with the client, need to ensure that
it is authorised to bind the client with respect all trades, whether effected
online (including EOL) or offline  This is not the case today in OTC
transactions and will not neccessarily be the case with the EnronOnline
broker client.

The agent will need to meet the usual legal/regulatory/financial tests, as if
it were acting as principal - e.g. in the case of derivatives trades, the
agent must be regulated to carry on its business by the UK SFA [no doubt, the
CFTC swaps exemption test will also need to be met]  Lets discuss

The agent must also be a corporate or similar commercial enterprise The
broker must be financially able to meet margin requirements

Look forward to your response.

Thanks

Justin

To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michael
Bridges/NA/Enron@ENRON, Teresa Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Broker Client Process flow

We are currently in discussions with 3-4 brokers (including GFI in London) to
allow them to transact on behalf of their customers via EnronOnline.  Mark
Taylor suggested that I send you some information on the broker client
application and the process flow.  Attached please find the functional
specifications for the broker client and a draft process flow.  All documents
are work in progress.

We have been discussing this with Amita Gosalia (EnronOnline Product
Control), Debbie Nichols and Gail Hill in the London Office.

Please call me with any question at 713 853-0397.  I will continue to
coordinate my legal questions through Mark Taylor.


I have to leave the office early for a trip with Bryant and won't be back until Monday.

DG


Hi Jason,
 Hope you'll have time to answer my messages today.
 We just wanted you to let you know not to bother to bring your suit to
Dad's retirement. A shirt and tie will be fine. (However, pants are NOT
optional!)
 Dad received the Father's day card yesterday. It was a riot! I think Dad is
finished with the tattoos though.
.Please let me know about the check.
 Love, Mom


The following message was sent to you as an opt-in subscriber to
Option-Wizard.com. We will continue to bring you valuable offers on the
products and services that interest you most. If you wish to unsubscribe
please click here: Unsubscribe

[IMAGE][IMAGE]

  Don't Let April Showers Get You Down...
Take A Getaway On Us!!!!

Claim  Your FREE Gift NOW!!!

Choose  From Either...

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]


Message sent from the pjm-customer-info mailing list at
pjm-customer-info@majordomo.pjm.com:

ISO New England and PJM Interconnection Propose a
Standard Market Design for Wholesale Electricity Markets

March 29, 2001 - HOLYOKE, MA -  Two of the country's leading wholesale
electricity market administrators, ISO New England Inc. and PJM
Interconnection,
L.L.C., together with ALSTOM ESCA Corporation, a systems developer for
electric
utilities, today announce their intent to formalize an agreement that will not
only standardize their electricity markets, but will lead, they believe, to
the
standardization of wholesale electricity markets across the country.

Today, ISO New England delivered a letter to the Chairman and Commissioners of
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), enclosing a report concerning
its proposed comprehensive wholesale market program that combines salient
features of the PJM market model with elements of its own existing wholesale
market design.  The combination would create a standardized wholesale market
structure called the Standard Market Design for wholesale electricity markets
("Standard Market Design").

ISO New England, ALSTOM ESCA and PJM, acting through its wholly-owned
subsidiary, PJM Technologies Inc., have agreed to proceed with the negotiation
of an agreement where ISO New England will purchase the existing PJM market
design and certain software components from ALSTOM ESCA and PJM.  The two ISOs
and ALSTOM ESCA will work together to create a standardized market design that
includes solutions to reserve markets and a common solution to unit dispatch.

"This new market standard should put into place the necessary market
improvements more quickly and at a reduced cost than if we were to implement a
customized market system for New England," said William W. Berry, Chairman and
Acting CEO of ISO New England.  "Now is the time to stop the experimentation.
Ultimately, we hope the Standard Market Design will serve as the benchmark for
wholesale electricity marketplaces across the country, if not around the
world."

"PJM is very excited to further standardize a design for a competitive
wholesale
electricity market," said Phillip G. Harris, Chairman and CEO of PJM. "Along
with the progress in the implementation of the PJM West concept, this
initiative
will provide an even broader standardized market design."

This approach should further expedite the elimination of trading barriers
across
different markets and promote FERC's goal of creating a seamless marketplace.
"We intend to continue to work with the New York ISO on issues of mutual
importance," stated Mr. Berry.  "This new market design, together with our
efforts to address the market "seams" and other coordination issues, will
eventually bring the three northeast ISO markets closer together."  ISO New
England and the New York ISO will continue to work together on these issues
under a joint board resolution passed on January 16, 2001.

"Because of our geographic location, New York is in the center of the
Northeast
markets, with ISO New England, PJM and IMO each on one of our borders.  We
support the continued elimination of barriers across Northeast trading markets
to develop a more seamless marketplace where everyone will benefit," said
William J. Museler, President and CEO of the New York Independent System
Operator. "The New York ISO will continue to work with our neighboring markets
to remove barriers to trading across the region and to move towards larger
regional markets."

This proposed market design standard will be developed jointly with
stakeholder
input. ISO New England will propose the Standard Market Design to the New
England Conference of Public Utility Commissioners and the New England Power
Pool in a series of meetings next week.  Additional meetings will be conducted
in the next few weeks. The Standard Market Design for New England will be
subject to FERC approval.

"Standardization requires consistent and reliable technology to facilitate a
market's efficiency.  A market that moderates price fluctuations and
encourages
investment based on an expected return is an efficient market -- and
efficiency
is the key to establishing market liquidity," said Alain Steven, CEO of ALSTOM
ESCA.  "In the future, this agreement will be viewed as a catalyst in
establishing more robust electricity markets."

ISO New England Inc. is the not-for-profit corporation responsible for the
day-to-day reliable operation of New England's bulk generation and
transmission
systems with an installed capacity of almost 26,000 megawatts.  In addition to
operating the bulk power grid, ISO New England is the administrator of the
region's wholesale electricity marketplace and the Open Access Transmission
Tariff on behalf of the New England Power Pool. ISO New England is based in
Holyoke, Massachusetts.

The PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., is an Independent System Operator,
administering the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff and operating the PJM
Energy Markets and Capacity Markets. PJM currently administers the largest
wholesale electricity market in the world and has a membership of more than
200.
It is headquartered in Norristown, Pennsylvania. PJM Technologies, Inc. is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., designed to respond to
market opportunities by bringing cost-effective, reliable solutions to the
energy marketplace. It was created to commercialize PJM's knowledge capital,
experience, and proven success in electric energy markets, system operations,
and applications development.

# # #

For more information about the New York ISO, please call: Steve Sullivan,
Director of Communications, 518-356-7605.

Please DO NOT REPLY to this message. If you have a question for PJM Customer
Relations and Training, please complete and submit this form:
http://www.pjm.com/contact/questions.html

To unsubscribe from this list, send an e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pjm.com
containing only the following line in the body of the e-mail:

unsubscribe pjm-customer-info


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/04/2000
06:14 PM ---------------------------

Kimberly Watson@ENRON
02/04/2000 04:12 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: El Paso / ENA Deal Completely Terminated Now

I'm sure you have already heard this, but here is a summary.  Kim.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron on 02/04/2000
04:11 PM ---------------------------
ET & S Business Intelligence
From: Lorna Brennan on 02/04/2000 02:30 PM
To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julie McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lou
Geiler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim Aron/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Klimesh/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sarabeth Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Sova/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rob Wilson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lon
Stanton/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Kristen Hand/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey
Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joni Bollinger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David
Badura/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Janet Bowers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Craig
Buehler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Burleson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Allen
Cohrs/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Fiscus/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bret
Fritch/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steve Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Morgan
Gottsponer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Brenda Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Harvey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephen Herber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dana
Jones/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jane Joyce/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
Korbelik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Mangels/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Penny McCarran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Vernon
Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen
Peebles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Perales/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Perry/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Loren Penkava/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ken
Powers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joan Schwieger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Sebesta/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frank Semin/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Neal
Shaw/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Swett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kay
Threet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike Ullom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Valley/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Chuck Wilkinson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Wiltfong/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Lagerstrom/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ray Stelly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Stevens/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Sue M Neville/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Barry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Miriam Martinez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Janousek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Don
Powell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Tosoni/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Weller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael G Stage/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Johanson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chris Gaskill/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery
Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: El Paso / ENA Deal Completely Terminated Now

El Paso, Enron Terminate $38 Million Mega-Deal

     In a stunning announcement late yesterday, El Paso Natural Gas said it
had reached a
     "mutual agreement" with Enron North America Corp. to terminate the $38
million
     negotiated mega-deal for 1.2 Bcf/d of capacity that the marketer had
entered into in
     December. The negotiated arrangement covers three separate capacity
agreements.

     The decision to release Enron from the three capacity agreements was
somewhat
     puzzling, given that Enron last week had asked to be let out of only one
contract - the
     famed Block II agreement (614 MMcf/d) - due to the restrictions that
FERC had
     placed on the delivery rights of the capacity. In a Jan. 27 letter,
Enron notified El Paso
     of its intent to exit the Block II contract, but the letter didn't
indicate that it wanted to
     terminate the Blocks I and III contracts. See Daily GPI, Feb. 3)

     "They asked for it [to be released] and we agreed to it. It was a mutual
agreement,"
     said El Paso spokesman Mel Scott. The capacity agreements will be
terminated on Jan.
     31. Afterward, El Paso said it will hold open season from Feb. 7 to Feb.
14 for the
     capacity.

     "It is unfortunate that the recent FERC order modified the capacity
rights in a way that
     will not allow the capacity to serve the purpose that Enron North
America originally
     intended when they outbid the prearranged transactions. In the interest
of fairness and
     good customer relations, we have agreed to release them from the
contracts," said John
     W. Somerhalder II, president of El Paso Energy's Pipeline Group.

     El Paso Natural Gas has asked FERC to reconsider the mid-January order
that
     essentially has reduced the commercial value of the Block II firm
transportation
     capacity that Enron had agreed to acquire. With the collapse of its
contract deal with
     Enron, it couldn't be immediately determined whether El Paso will
continue to pursue
     rehearing.

     El Paso is seeking rehearing after being rebuffed by FERC in its request
to stay the
     provision in the order restricting delivery rights of Block II capacity.

     The pipeline is seeking a reversal of a decision in which FERC said El
Paso's 1996
     turned-back capacity settlement bars El Paso from marketing Block II
capacity on a
     primary basis to any delivery point other than the one at Pacific Gas &
     Electric-Topock, AZ. That ruling stripped the Block II capacity of
primary delivery
     access to the Southern California Gas-Topock delivery point, which is
the most
     sought-after by shippers of San Juan Basin gas.

     It was a major blow to El Paso and Enron, which had contracted for the
Block II
     capacity in December on the condition that it would have primary
delivery access to the
     Southern California market..

     Without a favorable decision on rehearing, "the result may well be a
diminution of the
     value of Block II capacity," El Paso told FERC. "Without question,
Enron, as a new
     shipper on the capacity" and future holders of that capacity "will
suffer a disadvantage in
     the market...."

     El Paso contends the Commission's ruling, if unchanged, would thwart the
intent of the
     1996 settlement, which called for the pipeline and its customers to
share the risks of
     unsubscribed capacity on El Paso's system, and for El Paso to share a
portion of the
     revenues it received from re-marketing the capacity.

     "An essential element in El Paso's ability to maximize the revenues it
agreed to share
     with its firm customers was the ability to market the 614 MMcf/d of
Block II capacity
     on a primary basis to delivery points other than PG&E-Topock," the
pipeline noted.
     Stripping El Paso of delivery-point flexibility for Block II capacity
"will have a serious
     adverse impact on [its] ability to generate the maximum possible
revenues for its
     capacity and thereby recover the costs it and its customers would
otherwise have to
     absorb."

     El Paso further said the Commission's decision was at odds with a 1998
order
     addressing whether the pipeline could re-market capacity turned back by
PG&E to the
     SoCal-Topock delivery point on a primary basis. Since the 1996
settlement was silent
     on whether El Paso could re-market the capacity to delivery points other
than
     PG&E-Topock, the Commission reasoned the settlement didn't preclude El
Paso from
     selling the capacity at SoCal-Topock.

     "That ruling established the proper interpretation of the 1996
settlement. Now, the
     Commission has re-interpreted that same provision in a manner that is
completely
     contrary to its previous ruling. The Commission provides no explanation
as to how
     these two rulings can be reconciled or, alternatively, why it has
changed its mind...."

     El Paso said it was also seeking rehearing because it "cannot find any
evidence" in the
     mid-January order that the Commission "even read, much less considered"
its response
     as to the "proper interpretation" of the1996 settlement.


Attached please find a sheet of pro and con statements.

 <<Statements.doc>>

 - Statements.doc


18:12:07 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Nemec, Gerald'
18:12:07 Synchronizing Hierarchy
18:12:08 Synchronizing Favorites
18:12:08 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
18:12:31 	   11 item(s) added to offline folder
18:12:31 	   1 item(s) changed read-state in offline folder
18:12:31 	   42 item(s) deleted in offline folder
18:12:31 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
18:12:31 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
18:12:52 	   9 item(s) added to offline folder
18:12:52 	   1 item(s) updated in offline folder
18:12:52 	   10 item(s) deleted in offline folder
18:12:52 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
18:12:52 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
18:12:52 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
18:12:52 Synchronizing Folder 'Earnings'
18:12:52 Synchronizing Folder 'Enron Financials'
18:12:52 Synchronizing Folder 'Expense Report'
18:12:52 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
18:12:52 Synchronizing Folder 'Lotus Notes'
18:12:52 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
18:12:52 Synchronizing Folder 'Personal'
18:12:52 Synchronizing Folder 'Phone List'
18:12:53 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
18:12:53 Synchronizing Folder 'To Do'
18:12:53 Synchronizing Folder 'Travel Info.'
18:12:53 Synchronizing Folder 'Vacation'
18:12:53 Synchronizing Folder 'WestLaw & Lexis'
18:12:53 Synchronizing Views
18:12:53 Synchronizing Forms
18:12:54 Done


I think we definitely need clarification on the July date, but we should defer to Tom Riley on approaching UC/CSU for help.

James D Steffes@ENRON
07/19/2001 12:47 PM
To:	Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Jeremy Blachman@EES, dleff@enron.com@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Diann Huddleson@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:	Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject:	CONFIDENTIAL: DASR Update

The attached indicates that UC/CSU are still not fully back to DA.  Does it make sense to try and get their help in making sure that the legislation does not limit their return to DA?  What is our current relationship with that customer?

Also, does anyone have any problems with Govt Affairs using this information when we are asking for "clarification" on the July 12 date?  It may be helpful to highlight for the key legislative members exactly who they are hurting with their decisions.

Thanks,

Jim

To:	James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeremy Blachman
cc:	dleff@enron.com, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Diann Huddleson, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES

Subject:	DASR Update

This is the daily report we get regarding DASR's.  We regularly scrub this report for accuracy but it can give you a feel for where we are in the process.  The "CA DASR Scorecard" is a summary.

Again, we'll continue to improve the accuracy of the reporting and will keep you in the loop.

Please let me know if you need additional information.

Thanks,

Evan
---------------------- Forwarded by Evan Hughes/HOU/EES on 07/19/2001 12:27 PM ---------------------------

mbrown52@csc.com on 07/19/2001 08:32:16 AM
To:	ehughes2@enron.com, dhuddles@enron.com, vgonzal2@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	Reports for this morning's meeting

Here are the reports for the 9:00 CDT update.

(See attached file: 071801 500 PM CA COMM STATUS RPRT.xls)   (See attached
file: CA DASR Scorecard 071801 500PM.doc)
 - 071801 500 PM CA COMM STATUS RPRT.xls
 - CA DASR Scorecard 071801 500PM.doc

<Embedded StdOleLink>


good, I have some direct meters forms that are under tolerance.  Not a big deal, I simply signed them without looking at them.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Valdes, John
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:56 AM
To:	Winfree, O'Neal D.; Love, Phillip M.; Keiser, Kam; Palmer, B. Scott
Cc:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	Forms

Are the forms any better this month???  If not, let me know where they are lacking and I will correct.  Thanks.

John


If you guys would like this sheet as well, then send an email to Amy Felling.

Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: Felling, Amy
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 8:34 AM
Subject: Enron West Gas Pricing Sheet


Further to this morning 's note,  this  most recent  version  is more
complete  and
I  would   greatly appreciate your   comments/changes/thoughts  on  it  as
soon  as  possible
 as to whether  it is useful or not   to your  constituents.  and if so  we
will  embrace the changes you suggest and
if the document  does  the job as we hope it will,  we  will complete  the
graphics , proofing  work  and  go to print 5000 copies  soonest.

  Thx  and regards

Margaret


The attached schedule covers both Sunday & Monday; associated text files will be posted to Sparky.  Apologies for the tardiness as initial forecast problems had to be addressed.

Michael R. Frazier
Manager
Load Forecasting Desk
Enron Energy Services
Office: 713-345-3200
Pager: 877-926-0615
P-mail: 8779260615@skytel.com


sorry for the delay, I just checked my email

1.  yes
2. Lorraine Ryall met came to Houston during March 2000 for Gas Fair and she
stopped by our office for a brief visit.
3.  I am not aware of any.

Please let me know if I can be of further assistance.

From: Britt Davis/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/03/2001 07:54 AM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rita Bahner/ENRON@enronXgate, Becky Zikes/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: ENA v. Triad

 Scott and Tori:

 I hope you are both doing well.  I have some questions for you about this
matter that will help me on a jurisdictional legal issue:

 1.  Can we say that for each of the spot gas sales that you made to Triad,
Triad would have called you (or someone else with ENA) first, and that you
would have taken the call in Houston?  I am assuming that this is probably
the case, but I would like to get confirmation from each of you.

 2.  Did Sherwood Purnell or anyone else from Triad ever come to Houston to
meet with either of you (or anyone else with ENA of whom you are aware)?

 3.  Are there any other contacts between Triad and Texas that either of you
are aware of?

 Many thanks for your usual quick response.

 Britt

 P.S. to Becky--I think you had some questions for Credit about how much is
owed.  Can you please flange that down today or tomorrow?  I want to get the
petition filed this week.


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000 12:10 PM
---------------------------

<mrupe@cima-energy.com> on 10/11/2000 04:30:23 PM
To: <mmartin@cmdrealty.com>, <mrupe@cima-energy.com>,
<peterc@huddlestonco.com>, <texican@texicannaturalgas.com>,
<support@iteam.com>, <clarsen@pdq.net>, <ranchbubba@aol.com>, <ahb@pdq.net>,
<landjread@compuserve.com>, <COP77777@aol.com>, <AABAUER@AOL.COM>,
<CSSKE@GATEWAY.NET>, <michaelcokinos@compuserve.com>, <jane@rensimer.com>,
<TEXAG1983@AOL.COM>, <Diego556@aol.com>, <CPSelzer@aol.com>,
<CPSelzer@aol.com>, <michaelcokinos@compuserve.com>, <rebec_1@msn.com>,
<sjh155@hotmail.com>, <meldwawg@msn.com>, <wallacej@dellnet.com>,
<mariegary@pdq.net>, <ranchbubba@aol.com>, <support@iteam.com>,
<willj206@aol.com>, <twwren@msn.com>, <rgregory@bracepatt.com>,
<texican@texicannaturalgas.com>, <bcdaw@swbell.net>,
<KClerkley@WestsidePropertiesInc.com>, <HBELTRAN@EV1.NET>, <codyjb@evg.net>,
<caron@starcomglobal.com>, <wdh@coastalsecurities.com>,
<MasterDave27@aol.com>, <margojanec@aol.com>, <B74blades@aol.com>,
<karen.erhardt@hcahealthcare.com>, <Tzay418@cs.com>, <cberg1800@aol.com>,
<eltres@ev1.net>, <scaton@houston.rr.com>, <TTCRB@aol.com>,
<patricktgreen@msn.com>, <rgregory@bracepatt.com>, <ldeere@pdq.net>,
<makill33@aol.com>, <bower1961@aol.com>, <rogerf@pioneercontract.com>,
<bkinser@ev1.net>, <lincar@webtv.net>, <kim.hurt@apachecorp.com>,
<seacraft@mail.ev1.net>, <McConkeyscott@aol.com>, <cmwalker61@aol.com>,
<support@iteam.com>, <jschwarz@flash.net>, <support@iteam.com>,
<lrichie@houston.camco.slb.com>, <marshall_heins@mhhs.org>,
<thereesehouse@pdq.net>, <support@iteam.com>, <mbreakey@pmet.com>,
<supermangene@AOL.com>, <makill33@aol.com>, <wjwstone@aol.com>,
<rreichert@nfl2002.com>, <rreichert@nfl2002.com>, <mlrs@swbell.net>,
<Agreggoftexas@aol.com>, <bushongsc@c-b.com>, <InfiniteCavalier@aol.com>,
<markj@woodwardmarketing.com>, <crcolyer@aol.com>, <RMAGEE5809@AOL.COM>,
<jack.calkins@compaq.com>, <vickie_anderson@huntsman.com>,
<jennifer.bowman@marchfirst.com>, <jbdunbar1@aol.com>, <RWASBA@aol.com>,
<sewbibbins@mailcity.com>, <hcchris@ibm.net>, <hcchris@ibm.net>,
<RWASBA@aol.com>, <none@na.com>, <butch@watsonmoving.com>,
<digiman28@aol.com>, <kay_mitchell@hotmail.com>, <DBennyDad@aol.com>,
<robin99tim@yahoo.com>, <sneal@enron.com>, <GeorgeR@RangerAmericanSecurity>,
<rkgbh@aol.com>, <KbutchW@aol.com>, <Catho928@aol.com>,
<murphyg@mercersales.com>, <DBennyDad@aol.com>, <jdaghorn@aol.com>,
<Mrreemus@aol.com>, <aharrison@aglife.com>, <peggy01@ev1.net>,
<kingb@nuevoenergy.com>, <BBURGE@FLASH.NET>, <EGwydir@aol.com>,
<tdpatton00@yahoo.com>, <willbaird@mindspring.com>, <jhorner@bracepatt.com>,
<germex@aol.com>, <smr@pinnacletrust.com>, <carlosjoanie@pdq.net>,
<shannonjeff@msn.com>, <jrobrien@bopc.com>, <dcelliott@ev1.net>,
<ELawal@aol.com>, <michaelk@aztecpartyandtentrentals.com>,
<jeb.bashaw@painewebber.com>, <JulSias@aol.com>, <willbaird@mindspring.com>,
<KEENERGILL@AOL.COM>, <LHStubbs@aol.com>, <bwanger@gateway.net>,
<burkett@petris.com>, <sclandry@prodigy.net>, <suprman@texas.net>
cc:
Subject: 2000-01 Boys & Girls Basketball Season

REMINDER:

Registration is now open for the SBMSA 2000-01 Boys & Girls Basketball
Season.  Online registration is at www.sbmsa.org.  In person registration
is at Spring Branch Elementary School Thursday, October 12th from 6pm to
8pm and Sunday, October 15th from 1pm to 3pm.

SPACE IS LIMITED - REGISTER SOON!!


Tom, who would be considered "high priority members" of our group?  (see below)
Laura

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jordan, Paul
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:00 PM
To:	Arguijo, Cheryl; Black, Tamara Jae; Brooks, Loretta; Chapman, Christy; Choate, Heather; Coleman, Venita; Collins, Angie; Finnels-Neal, La Donna; Guerra, Claudia; Hennessy, Sonia; Holcombe, Tina ; Jackson, Brandee; Jones, Melissa; Rangel, Ina; Rode, Tina; Romero, Araceli; Saldana, Alex; Shoemake, Lisa; Showers, Digna; Snow, Dina; Zarsky, Lisa; Bates, Kimberly; Clyatt, Julie; Harvey, Claudette; Hogan, Irena D.; Kumar, Madhup; Moore, Kevin G.; Presas, Jessica; Schoppe, Tammie; Tijerina, Shirley; Vuittonet, Laura; Young, Becky
Cc:	Marcinkowski, Danielle; Sieckman, John
Subject:	Enron Center South Move - 5th & 6th Floors

All,

Market Data needs to know who the high priority members of your group are. We would like to test those individuals market data applications in Enron Center South during the moves on November 9th and 16th. Please reply with the names of those people who are of high priority in your group.

Thank you,

Paul Jordan
Enron Net Works
Market Data Analyst
Paul.Jordan@enron.com
(713) 853-0320


---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Ward/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2001 11:17 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Julie A Gomez                           03/14/2001 01:49 PM

To: Tyrell Harrison/NA/Enron@Enron, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Exhibits to Kern Predecent Agreement

Attached are the completed Exhibit A's that are required for the Kern Open
Season.  The bid requires that a seperate Precedent Agreement (PA) be
submitted with each Exhibit A, so that means your customers must sign two
PA's and submit one Exhibit with each.  Also the credit worthiness and the
affiliate statement must be submitted with each PA.  Instead of submitting
all your affiliates you can instead submit the following statement:

 "Shipper warrants and represents that no other affiliate is participating in
the open season"

Julie  :-)


Attached are the revised CA's for the compression projects with Rusk County.  I have added Northeast Texas as a party to both agreements.  Please review and let me know if you have any questions.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:43 AM
To:	Draper, David
Subject:	Contacts

Name			Company			Number		Comment
Toby Lester		FPL Energy Services		561-625-7020	Small player but they may sleeve some volumes for you.
Scott Garrison		Entergy-Koch			713-544-4999	I don't think I spoke to this guy.  I can't remember.
Jim Taylor		Reliant Energy			713-207-1482	See note below.
[Germany, Chris]
Nelson Ferries	Duke Energy			713-989-0725	Nelson never told me that he wouldn't do any deals so you might get something going.

Reliant Energy.  I would like to talk to Reliat if you want to do something with them.  I currently have a cash balance of $228,000 with Reliant.  We are going to send them and invoice for $156,000 for sales ENA made to Reliant.  That will leave me with about $71,000 and maybe we can do something to work it off.

Cinergy will not trade with Enron.  Robin Barbe's contact told her they would not trade with us regardless.


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
12:14 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jean Mrha @ ENRON                           09/26/2000 09:35 AM

To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: for Hunter

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jean Mrha/NA/Enron on 09/26/2000 09:26 AM
---------------------------

"Oatsboy@BuffNet.net" <oatsboy on 09/26/2000 09:54:15 AM
Please respond to oatsboy@buffnet.net
To: Jean <Jean.Mrha@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: for Hunter

Jean,

Tell Hunter that I turned on the heat yesterday, September 25.

Love , Dad


-----Original Message-----
From: Shively, Hunter S.
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:09 PM
To: Grigsby, Mike; ',trademup@yahoo.com'
Subject: Who did it Foreign Report presents an alternative view.htm


my cell phone is charging, give me 30 minutes.

ckm

From: Carlos Sole on 03/23/2001 03:51 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: WEEKLY CONFERENCE CALLS - Wednesday - MHI Turbine Contract

If you can, pls call


** URGENT NOTIFICATION:  SI Server will be
UNAVAILABLE, Tuesday, August 28, 2001 (14:20 to 14:55pdt) to Perform a
Fallback to our backup SI server in Alhambra.

		Please submit all Hour Ahead schedules for August 28th  HE ,
1800 and 1900 and Supplemental Energy schedules for, 1700 and 1800 prior to
1400.

				Once the fallback is complete and the SI
system is available, Please clear your memory and disk caches (Edit,
Preferences, Advanced, Cache) & close all Netscape windows (including
messages).  Restart Netscape and point your browsers to our Backup server by
utilizing the following URL: https://alhibk1b/iso.

Please contact Benik DerGevorgian (916) 351-2277 bdgevorgian@caiso.com or
Michael Glatz (916) 608-5727
Client Relations Communication
CRCommunications@caiso.com


I am finalizing the negotiation of the ISDA Master Agreement with SITA.  You
will recall that this is an ECTRIC; master NOT ENA.  SITA has (1) requested
evidence of EEFT's ability to sign for ECTRIC and (2) confirmation that "EEFT
is signing on the basis of their authority under the investment services
directive".  Would you please provide directly to SITA's lawyers as follows:

Susan Hopkinson and Sharon Lewis at Lovells in Paris:

susan.hopkinson@lovells.com
sharon.lewis@lovells.com

If you require phone or fax:

Tel:  33 1 53 67 47 47
Fax:  33 1 47 23 96 12

Please let me know when you have satisfied this request.  Thanks.  Sara


Leslie,

Holden just informed me that he wants to use Pinnacle without any reference to 250 or 500 kV.

Thanks,

CW
3-7533

-----Original Message-----
From: Hansen, Leslie
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:11 PM
To: Walker, Chris
Subject: RE: West Wing 500 kV

Chris:

I'm still waiting on Holden Salisbury to look into this product a bit more -- he's confirming that they really want the Pinnacle 500 kV.

Leslie

-----Original Message-----
From: Walker, Chris
Sent: Wed 9/19/2001 9:33 AM
To: Hansen, Leslie
Cc:
Subject: RE: West Wing 500 kV

Leslie,

Have you had a chance to look into the other location requested by West Power, Pinnacle Peak.

Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Hansen, Leslie
Sent:   Monday, September 17, 2001 1:46 PM
To:     Walker, Chris; Meredith, Kevin
Cc:     Salisbury, Holden
Subject:        West Wing 500 kV

Please create a new delivery point for West power as follows:

West Wing 500 kV:  The transaction is for delivery or receipt of power at WestWing, AZ 500 kV.

Please give me a call with any questions.

Leslie


Can you keep a running list of attendees and RSVP's?  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Linda L. Golden" <mkllg@mail.utexas.edu>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October  10, 2001 9:05 PM
To:	Beck, Sally
Cc:	ehelen@mail.utexas.edu
Subject:	Re: UT/Enron Dinner - Tuesday, October 16, 2001

Sally--I look forward to seeing you again and will be there.  Linda Golden

At 04:13 PM 10/10/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Attached please find an invitation to attend a dinner hosted by Enron to
>honor this year's recipients of the Enron MBA Excellence Fund
>Scholarships.  This is our third year to work jointly with many of you
>in the business school to award these scholarships to outstanding
>students in their second year of the MBA program. One of the highlights
>to those of us involved from Enron is the dinner that we host to
>recognize the students and to renew associations with many of you.  I
>hope that you will be able to join us at The Josephine House on Tuesday,
>October 16 for cocktails at 7:00pm and dinner at 7:30pm.  In attendance
>from Enron will be Rick Causey and me, plus a few others from our senior
>management team who will be in Austin conducting our on-campus
>interviews for Enron's Analyst Program.  I will send each of you a final
>list of attendees by the end of this week.
>
>
>					 <<Scholar Dinner
>Invit.-10-16-01.doc>>
>
>
>Sally W. Beck
>Chief Operating Officer
>Enron Net Works, LLC
>Phone - 713.853.5926
>Fax - 713.345.8100
>sally.beck@enron.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
>**********************************************************************
>
>Attachment Converted: "c:\linda\eudora\attach\Scholar Dinner
Invit.-10-16-01.doc"
>


Slow browser may need to wait 15 seconds for your email to appear, then scroll to view.
mailto:leave-enerfaxdaily-799289M@relay.netatlantic.com
to unsubscribe enerfaxdaily as: mwhitt@ect.enron.com forward to web@enerfax.com

If your email does not support this web
version, please subscribe to the free text version by writing subscribe@enerfax.com
Please visit our website to view today's gas and power prices and news by
clicking http://www.enerfax.com

If you received this in error or no longer wish to subscribe click this link mailto:leave-enerfaxdaily-799289M@relay.netatlantic.com or forward to web@enerfax.com


Few things:
Linda:  Thanks very much for the call and the help.Tyson is calling John Doer
(sp?) to try to get him in the loop. And she agreed to send the proposal to
Summers today.  Proposal to follow.
I'm working with a guy named Phil Verleger (MIT economist type who worked in
Ford and Carter), who I met at the meeting on Saturday, to come up with a
list of individuals with Democratic, contributor, business community
credientials that can be contacted to seek support for the proposal.  Any
suggested contacts that folks have would be helpful.
John Nesslage (who works for Jim) is running some numbers to get an idea of
the size of rate increases required to pay back the loans under a 10-year
term structure
The UC  Berkeley econ/biz school faculty members I met with on Saturday want
to issue a press release stating there view on "what not to do" (i.e., don't
have the state take over anything, period).  They want to give us a copy to
review for comments/edits before they issue it.  I should be getting tonite
or first thing in the AM tomorrow.  May not go anywhere, but I told them that
I'd be happy to review it.

Jeff


I spoke to her over the phone and told her that we were short of the nom and
she told me that a buy back needs to be put into place..  HL&P has paid us
for the full 20,000 on the 27th.   We have a Entex Meeting on the 5th in Room
37C1 @ 11:30, we can all discuss it then if you want to.

Daren J Farmer@ECT
02/01/2001 01:06 PM
To: Paul Couvillon/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Deal # 529159 for December 2000

We will need to wait until Janet gets back.  This is a spot deal that was
done by Gary Lamphier.  Did Janet negotiate something with them after the
fact?

D

Paul Couvillon@ENRON
02/01/2001 12:58 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Deal # 529159 for December 2000

Janet Wallis told me so.

Daren J Farmer@ECT
02/01/2001 12:48 PM
To: Paul Couvillon/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Deal # 529159 for December 2000

Paul,

How are you determining that we should have a buyback for this deal?

D

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary W Lamphier                           02/01/2001 10:14 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deal # 529159 for December 2000

Can either of you verify this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001
10:18 AM ---------------------------

Paul Couvillon@ENRON
01/31/2001 02:45 PM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joanie H Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Deal # 529159 for December 2000

Gary:

For Company 12 could you please put in a buy-back for Reliant Energy HL&P on
Contract # 96022113 for the volume of 1,286 Mmbtu's on 12/27/2000.  The
pipeline and point are HPL/UTTC-HARDY STREET MIDCON (BI-DIRECTIONAL) and the
scheduler is Mary Poorman @ X-35251.

The pricing should be as follows;
The lower of KATY MID day of flow or day after.

The pricing of KATY MID for 10/27 was $ 10.26
                10/28 was $ 9.63.

The sale counter-part to this purchase should go to deal # 529159.


Hey Sandra-

Here are the phone numbers of the dudes from Merrill Lynch that have been handling my account.

Charles Johansen - 281-775-8839
Brian Petrauskas - 281-775-8844

Good Luck

Julie  :-)


Hi Kate, Stephanie Checkout with Prebon because I was out last week and I am
still trying to clear up some deals from the 14th.   The west checkout person
at Prebon is on vacation and his back-up is just now getting back with me on
these discrepancies.

Matt Motley
deal 550383
Prebon says cp should be Neveda Power.,..........we have Sierra Pacific

Matt Motley
deal 550385
Prebon says cp should be Neveda Power.......we have Sierra Pacific

Sean Crandall
deal 550480
Prebon says cp should be Merrill Lynch......we have Morgan Stanley


test worked!  Jeff is out of town today, so I'm responding on his behalf.  SRS

	From:  Carol Castanos                           12/15/99 11:04 AM

To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Maria Elena Mendoza/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject:

test


Nobody in my shop has seen any of this.  I'm not sure what Rick is doing with
Skilling, and I am not in a position to respond to the outcome of their
meeting.  Eric Gonzales needs this ship, or at least play the card with
either British Gas or BP/Amoco for fuel to supply the spanish plant.  Eric is
frustrated as well, and nobody has done any economic or commercial study on
the exmar option.  I'll phone Bergsieker and see what I can find out.
Thanks.

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000
01:20 PM ---------------------------
   Merritt Thomas                08/28/2000 12:24 PM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Brad Hitch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Eric Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject:

Jeff,

Two quick points:

1.  We wanted to give you a heads-up in case you weren't aware - Rick
Bergsieker is planning to meet with Skilling sometime this week (believe
post-Wednesday) to talk about the exercise of the first Exmar option.

This option expires on September 8th, an extension from the original expiry
of 31 August.
Option 2 (for a third vessel - to expire 30 November) will expire along with
option 1, if option 1 is not exercised.
Option 1 is US$1,000/day more than the original vessel.  Option 2 is
US$1,500/day more than the original vessel.  (The original vessel is
US$51,850/day fixed + US$10,790 O&M escalating)
As discussed earlier, Bergsieker's group is offering the use of the Hoegh
Galleon (Mystic Lady) to Kogas as an incentive for them to sub-charter the
second Exmar vessel from us.
While we are not aware of the terms of the sub-charter agreement, we do
perceive the shipping constraint in the industry to be most acute in the next
3 years, and thus not the best use of the Hoegh Galleon.

We are under the impression that Bergsieker also plans to use this
opportunity to discuss "LNG Strategy and Oversight", specifically his group's
future role in it.  Please see the attached presentation to this end.

2.  We had a planning meeting with Eric today and are pushing ahead on an
initial business plan to be delivered at the end of the week.  We expect to
cover the following:

Opportunities for Enron in this market
Value - where we can extract it
Assets - how best to utilise them
Resource planning
Goals

Please let us know if there is anything further you would like included at
this point, or if we can answer any questions regarding any of the above.

Thanks,
Merritt & Brad

+44-207-783-7063


I have contacted the relevant people of your interest in the job.

Danny_Jones%ENRON@eott.com on 04/30/2001 01:39:56 PM
To:	stan.horton@enron.com
cc:

Subject:	employee referral

Dear Mr. Horton,  I have recently been made aware of a help desk analyst
job#0000108806 that has become available in your department. I am currently
employed with the aviation department (hangar attendant) of enron and would
like to use my past knowledge and experience to persue my goals in the
technology feild. I am asking respectfully if you could give me a
recommendation or referral to ETS technology department. Anything you could
do to help further my goals would be appreciated.

          Respectfully,
          Danny Jones
     281-443-3744 smithjones@ev1.net


Kevin, thanks for getting back to me with names so promptly.  Everyone on the list will be an asset on this effort.  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sweeney, Kevin
Sent:	Friday, October  5, 2001 6:08 PM
To:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	Employee Retention and Development

Sally,

The following people are interested in helping Melissa Becker from EIM:

Shelly Wood
Sam Leuschen
Lisa Csikos
Mike Moscoso

Kevin


The Rate and Currency Curves will be available at approximately 1:00 pm today.  I will keep you informed if their are any changes.

Clara Carrington
Financial Trading
Manager - Rate and Currency Risk Mgmt
Direct Tel: (713) 853-9224
Email:  Clara.Carrington@enron.com


NY law is fine.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Stephanie Panus@ENRON
	02/08/2001 09:55 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Louis Dreyfus Plastics

Sara,

Louis Dreyfus Plastics has returned a confirmation we recently prepared and
has asked for New York law, rather than Texas law.  Derek Bailey at the
confirm desk wanted to know if this was ok.


Thanks for your email.  The Assignment looks fine.  Regarding Exhibits "C" and "D", I have copies of executed parental guaranties  for both parties and will fax same to you.

 Many thanks for your help. Have a great weekend.

 Debra

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jim Hunt" <JHunt@nicor.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jim+20Hunt+22+20+3CJHunt+40nicor+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 3:55 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Cc:	PamKirchhoff@NicorEnergy.com
Subject:	Re: Master Draft

Debra:

Attached for your consideration is a "red-lined" revised  draft of the Assignment Agreement reflecting our discussion earlier today.
Please let me know if the form of the Agreement as revised is acceptable.

Additionally, I have completed a review of the master agreement that you provided earlier today.  I do not anticipate that Nicor Energy will have many proposed revisions, but have yet to have an opportunity to discuss the agreement with my client.  Although Exhibit "C" and "D" were not attached to the master agreement that you provided, it is my understanding that Enron and Nicor Energy have already agreed to the terms of the parental guaranties associated with this Agreement.

James M. Hunt
1844 Ferry Road
Naperville, IL  60563
T:  (630) 983-8676 ext. 2257
F:  (630) 983-0481
E:  jhunt@nicor.com

>>> "Perlingiere, Debra" <Debra.Perlingiere@ENRON.com> 09/28 1:47 PM >>>
As discussed, please see the attached.

  <<Nicor Enerchange.doc>>

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************

 - Kaztek Assignment (Enron)  9.27.01.doc << File: Kaztek Assignment (Enron)  9.27.01.doc >>


This morning I raised a concern regarding TW's sale of excess fuel at
downstream points.  Here's the problem:  the tariff requires shippers to
tender fuel to us at their receipt points.  With rare exceptions, those
receipt points are not at the Cal. border.  Order 636 mandates that pipelines
unbundle transportation from storage.  It also requires that pipelines that
make gas sales do so at the furthest upstream point on their pipeline.  That
latter requirement means that if a pipe buys gas at point "x", it should
resell the gas at point "x" and not haul the gas to point "y" and then sell
it there as a delivered (i.e., bundled) product.  My concern this morning was
that our receipt of fuel gas in the San Juan or Permian and shipment of that
gas to the Cal. border for sale arguably violates the unbundling requirement
(because the Cal. border sale is a bundled combination of the sale and the
transportation of the gas to the downstream location) or the "furthest
upstream point" requirement or both.  Susan and my recollection was that when
ECS wanted to receive the Gallup fuel deliveries at  a point other than
Permian pool, we made them sign a transport contract to move the gas to where
they wanted it.  I haven't confirmed that recollection but I am recalling
that we told Courtney that we couldn't just move our fuel gas around
whereever we wanted it--we needed someone to pay us to transport it.

Irrespective of what we did with ECS, I think the following is the correct
way to look at this situation:  We receive fuel at the shippers' receipt
points.  Once we receive it, however, it is no longer "fuel."  It becomes
line pack until it is burned.   Line pack moves around based on a lot of
reasons, including shipper imbalances, etc.  It also, obviously, has to move
to the compressors where it is burned as fuel.   It is our job to  manage
line pack, and that means we buy line pack at locations where we are short,
and sell it at locations where we are long.  If we end up long at the Cal.
border from time to time, we should sell excess line pack to get line pack
back to optimal levels.  I wouldn't want to get into a pattern where we are
consistently buying line pack in the San Juan and Permian and selling line
pack at the Cal. border, but  thats not what we are talking about here.  I
can't think of anything in the tariff or otherwise that is inconsistent with
this interpretation of our authority as operator of the pipeline.  MKM--OK
with you?  DF


PLEASE NOTE:  This email includes several items.
(1)  the call in information for Friday's conference call;
(2)  a summary of yesterday's conference call (from Jeff Dasovich, Enron);
(3)  two documents that list the contact information we have received to date
(please email Steve Kean @ skean.enron.com if any changes/additions need to
be made to the list).  As we receive more contact information, revised lists
will be emailed to everyone.
______________________________________________________________________________
_________

A conference call has been scheduled for Friday, May 18th.

If credit issues are to be discussed, this is the call in number we will
use.
If credit issues are not to be discussed, a separate call in number will be
set up and you will be notified with the new dial in numbers.

DATE:  Friday, May 18th

TIME:   10:00 am (Central) - should last approx 1 hour

CALL IN #:  1-877-214-0402

HOST CODE: 564778   (Steve Kean's use only)

PARTICIPANT
CODE:  285987

If anyone needs to call in from an international location, please contact
Maureen McVicker at 713-853-1808 and she will set up an international number
too.

______________________________________________________________________________
__________________

Here is the summary Jeff Dasovich sent regarding yesterday's conference call.

Greetings:
In order to keep everyone in the loop, the folks on today's call wanted to
send out a brief summary of the call for the benefit of those who couldn't
make it.  Apologies for any omissions, inaccuracies, etc.  Others who were on
the call please chime in if I've gotten anything wrong, or missed anything.

Best,
Jeff

SUMMARY
Enron, Duke, El Paso and Williams were on the call, as was Michael Hoffman of
the Blackstone Group (the Governor's financial advisors).
On the subject of how the group would organize itself, it was agreed that the
calls would be open to anyone who wanted to participate.
A smaller group consisting of Duke, El Paso, Enron, and Williams would take
the lead on walking the halls of Sacramento, meeting with policy makers, and
advocating whatever plan the group develops.
Folks agreed that achieving a comprehensive solution requires a tangible
process; that is, the principals need to get in a room, face to face, for
however long it takes to work out a resolution.
It was agreed that the process should start no later than the beginning of
next week, and that it should take place in Sacramento.
It was decided that the Legislature and the Attorney General needed to be
brought into the process as soon as possible, i.e., next week.
There was some discussion regarding the release today of "Plan B."  Plan B is
a plan proposed by Democratic and Republican legislators as an alternative to
the MOU that the Governor struck with Edison.  After that call I received a
copy of "Plan B."  If you'd like a copy please send me your fax number.
Folks on the call agreed to have the next "supplier-only" call-in meeting on
Friday.
Finally, Michael Hoffman said that they are hoping to have a "ratings agency
level" presentation prepared by the end of the week.  The goal of the
presentation is to reassure capital markets that the bonds the state seeks to
issue are solidly backed by retail rates.

The Agenda for Tomorrow's Call with the Governor's Staff
Item #1:  The Credit Issue
Michael Hoffman said that the Governor's office wants to start tomorrow's
meeting discussing the creditworthiness issue.
Hoffman said that the Governor's folks are hoping to have completed by the
start of tomorrow's meeting a draft of an agreement between the California
PUC and CDWR.  The agreement is designed to ensure that DWR gets paid for
power services delivered.
If the draft is ready, they'd like to discuss on the call tomorrow.

Item #2:  Identify the Components of a Comprehensive Solution.
It was agreed that our group should put on the table at tomorrow's meeting
the universe of issues that need to be included in a comprehensive solution.
Enron was asked to take a first stab at what those components are.  The
following is a brief outline, which is not intended to be definitive, but a
starting point for discussion.
Utility creditworthiness
retail rates must reflect costs
Increase supply
streamline and otherwise reform the siting process
Decrease demand
establish real-time pricing
implement demand buy-down and other conservation programs
Create a real market
Remove the State from the power-buying business as soon as possible (e.g.,
once new rates are in place and utilities are returned to creditworthiness;
approximately 3-6 months)
Return the procurement role to the utilities
Reinstate Direct Access immediately for all customers
Within 18-24 months, create a "core/noncore" market structure for
electricity, similar to California's market structure for natural gas
Keep the industry in the hands of the private sector
Reject proposals calling on the State to take over transmission, generation,
etc.
Resolve outstanding legal claims, investigations, etc.
Resolution requires certainty and prompt payment (understanding that
discounts on receivables is on the table for discussion)
______________________________________________________________________________
__________________

Attached are the contact lists.


yes

	Richard Shapiro
	02/26/2001 01:34 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Northeast Water Plant

Do we still want this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 02/26/2001
01:39 PM ---------------------------

George Strong <gstrong@political.com> on 02/26/2001 12:23:17 PM
To: jean.ryall@enron.com, Chad.Landry@enron.com
cc: rshapiro@enron.com, Geriann Warner <Geriann_Warner@enron.com>

Subject: Northeast Water Plant

February 26, 2001

I note that the HAWC and the Northeast Water Plant is on the Infrastructure
Committee's agenda tomorrow at Houston City Council.

I am concerned about the proposed Azurix project with the Houston Area
Water Corporation and the City of Houston. Two weeks ago I met with the
Mayor and City Attorney on the Mayor's political business and they told me
of their concern about the future of Azurix.  They wanted some assurance
from Ken or Jeff that Azurix would be around as a part of Enron if it were
awarded the Northeast Water Plant Project.  I believe they had some
communications with Azurix officials but they really wanted to hear from
someone at Enron.

I sent the word back to Enron through Joe, that someone high up should
contract the Mayor and the City Attorney to give them whatever assurance
they could concerning their concerns. I believe Joe discussed this with Steve.

Last Wednesday night I saw the Mayor and asked him if his request through
me had any results.  Had he heard from Enron?  He said no, and that he
needed to have some better feeling about the future of Azurix.

I assume we are working hard to get this project but based on my
conversation I would think we need to give some communication to the Mayor
from someone high up in the Enron organization.

George


Marc Phillips
01/28/2000 06:59 AM
To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Butch Russell/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Mact Workshop

FYI. Another MACT workshop.

Marc
---------------------- Forwarded by Marc Phillips/OTS/Enron on 01/28/2000
08:01 AM ---------------------------

Marie Gutierrez <marieg@nmoga.org> on 01/27/2000 06:14:12 PM
To: Marie Gutierrez <marieg@nmoga.org>
cc: gallagher@nmoga.org, Deborah Seligman <seligman@nmoga.org> (bcc: Marc
Phillips/OTS/Enron)

Subject: Mact Workshop

The attached information is from Deborah Seligman.

 - 2-16-2000MACT.pdf

A. Marie Gutierrez
New Mexico Oil & Gas Association
505.982.2568
505.986.1094 (fax)

If I have sent you an attachment in ADOBE PDF format you will need the free
Acrobat 4 reader from ADOBE to view and print this file. You can visit this
site to get this free software.
http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html

 - att2.htm


Tony is on vacation today.  Please review asap.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron on 11/06/2000 08:49
AM ---------------------------

Steve Kirk
11/06/2000 07:47 AM
To: Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: New Product Version - Daily TFX

Tony, I need your review and approval asap for the attached E.Dubuque
delivery products that are "daily" in nature (one is for receipt at Ventura
and the other is for receipt at Demarc).  The rate aspect is the same
language as the one-part rates we have already used (designated as "R+C).
This "Dly" designation means that the term is one day which will be rolled
over day-to-day unless either party cancels the rollover.  The term language
shown here is the same as the "daily" language we have been using.  Call me
with your questions. Thanks. x7067.


Louise,

Yesterday afternoon I spoke with Walt Madro, Sr. Vice President of Global Gas and LNG, regarding Marathon's decision not to pursue a marketing/trading relationship with Enron.  Walt further clarified Marathon's poisition :

Marathon is in final negotiations to acquire a firm with both Upstream assets and a small, niche marketing arm.
Steve Lowden told Walt to hold off on the negotiations with Enron because of the acquisition of this firm and the potential duplication of marketing compentencies. (??)
I asserted that this firm, even if acquired, does not have the premier gas and power franchise like Enron and Walt agreed.
As such, Walt will contact me when the deal is completed - expected date is before the end of the year.

I will stay in contact with Walt and try to identify the firm being acquired.

Ultimately, I do not like how this "smells."  I would like to have a conversation with Lowden because the opportunity cost of not having a marketing/trading relationship with Enron versus acquiring this small firm (albeit receiving strategic Upstream assets), I can not compute intellectually.  Do you agree?

Mrha


Start Date: 1/20/02; HourAhead hour: 1;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012001.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Oh joy.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:07 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: FW: OFOs

Tim is gone.  Jess Hewitt and Kris Shireman have taken over that function, and they are the ones who are looking for the info.  Apparently they don't have it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 9:51 AM
To:	Lawner, Leslie
Subject:	FW: FW: OFOs

FYI.  You know if Tim's still at Enron?  I haven't heard from him for quite some time.
Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:50 AM
To:	Sullivan, Colleen
Subject:	RE: FW: OFOs

You should contact Tim directly.  There is a tariff section on each website and a search function using key words.  The utilities issue reports on OFO incidents, and Tim should have those as well.  Let me know if there's anything we can do.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sullivan, Colleen
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:37 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: FW: OFOs

Jeff-
Should I contact Tim Hamilton, or have you already done this?  Also--if you could help me find where in the websites the information is, that would be helpful.  Is it just the OFO tariffs that are on the websites or is there actual data on how often they have called OFOs, when they were called, etc. also published?  We need all of that to better evaluate our risks/costs of serving those customers.  Thanks for your help.

	Colleen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Sullivan, Colleen; Lawner, Leslie
Subject:	RE: FW: OFOs

Greetings Colleen:
I'm not sure who's still working on this and who's not, but sometime back, we did a very extensive effort with Tim Hamilton and the rest of the EES team to get all information compiled regarding OFOs behind PG&E and SoCalGas.  I'm hoping that that information still exists so we can hopefully avoid recreating the wheel.  If, for some reason, the information is lost, the good news is that all OFO tariffs are compiled and easily retrievable on the SoCalGas' and PG&E's websites.  Please let me know how else we can help.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sullivan, Colleen
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 8:42 AM
To:	Boston, Roy; Lawner, Leslie
Cc:	Migden, Janine; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: FW: OFOs

Thank you so much for this information.  It is EXTREMELY helpful to our efforts.  Thank you so much for the quick response.  I'll wait to hear for sure on the Chicago utilities, and hopefully on the California ones as well??  Again, thanks.

		Colleen Sullivan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boston, Roy
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 3:02 PM
To:	Lawner, Leslie
Cc:	Sullivan, Colleen; Migden, Janine; Dasovich, Jeff; Boston, Roy
Subject:	Re: FW: OFOs

Leslie -- Funny you should ask.  Columbia of Ohio called 51 OFO/OMO days last winter.  Other Columbia companies ( C of Penn., C of VA) did likewise.  Attached is a confidential draft complaint from our attorney in Ohio that I believe provides the info you seek.  Also attached is the Complaint filed by Hess,et al in Pennsylvania against Columbia there.  The facts and allegations are essentially the same:  confiscation/interruption of banked gas during OFO; OFO called for economic, not operational  reasons; heavy penalties for failure to deliver full MDQ; etc.
My recollection is that Peoples and NorthShore called few, if any OFOs last winter.  Ditto for Nicor. I have a call in to those that know first hand about these latter three utilities so I'll forward that answer as soon as I receive it.
Please call if you have any questions or if can be of further assistance.

 << File: COHdftComp.DOC >> 		 << File: HessCompl.pdf >> 		 << File: HessCompl2.pdf >>

	Leslie Lawner/ENRON@enronXgate 09/19/2001 02:29 PM 	   To: Janine Migden/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES  cc: Colleen Sullivan/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: FW: OFOs

Can you folks help me get the info on OFOs on the LDCs below to Colleen Sullivan, who is working with EES on this.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sullivan, Colleen
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:17 AM
To:	Lawner, Leslie
Subject:	OFOs

Last week I asked you about OFOs and you requested a list of the LDCs we are most interested in.  At this time (and in this order), I need any information you can give us on OFO history (frequency, actual dates, reason for OFO--system long or short?, etc.) on the following LDCs:

	PG&E, Socal
	NIGAS, Peoples (Chicago), Northshore
	Columbia of Ohio

This is a good starting point for now.  Just so you know, we need this data as we are trying to verify/set/modify (whatever you want to call it), the price curves being set by the traders reflecting LDC risk.  Obviously, the frequency of OFOs will affect our risk of doing business on a particular LDC, so we need to try to compare and access charges associated with each.  Any help or direction you can provide on where to get this data would be most appreciated.


Ina, will you have the IT group order and install Socal Gasslect and Passport
on my desktop and laptop pc?

Thank you,
Mike


Privileged and Confidential Joint Defense Communication

To:  Grynberg JDT
Re:  Bates Number Prefix Codes

        Unfortunately, we inadvertently omitted a number of defendants from the bates number prefix codes list.  A new version will be forthcoming in the next day or two.  I apologize for the inconvenience.

 Dawne M. Davis, CLA
Legal Assistant
Holland & Hart, LLP
P.O. Box 1347
Cheyenne, WY 82003
307-778-4240
307-778-8175 - fax
ddavis@hollandhart.com

NOTICE: This message is PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. It is sent under the terms and conditions of a Joint Defense Agreement (JDA) and is directed only to recipients who the sender believes have agreed to be bound by the JDA. If you do not agree to be bound by the JDA, or if you believe that this e-mail has been sent to you in error, please reply to notify the sender that you received the message in error, and please delete and disregard this e-mail. Thank you.


My last notes on Denmark from Edmund were due diligence pending.  What's the
scoop on commodity derivatives, weather derivatives, credit derivatives,
derivatives in general.  Any restrictions on any other products?

Thanks for your voicemail re:  Enron Metals.  I'll give you a call in the
morning when I get in.

I miss my Justy...


Our first Working Group meeting is set for Friday, January 14, at 9:30 am
Central Standard Time .  If you can't make it, please let me know and arrange
for an alternate, if possible.  At this meeting, we will develop group
objectives and some initial to-do's.

If you have not yet responded with your personal information and suggested
objectives, please do so prior to the meeting so we can update the agenda
with everyone's responses.  Thank you!

TIME:   1/14/00  9:30 am CST to 11:30 am CST
Call in Numbers - US   (will be provided with final agenda)
International   (will be provided with final agenda)

In Houston, Room EB 4741

I.     Administrative Issues
 a.  why a working group
 b.  expectations

II.     Our group
 a.  roster
 b.  suggested objectives

III.    Consensus Group Objectives
 (develop single set for the group)

IV.   Identify initial set of subgroups
 a. purpose of subgroups


Mike Driscoll is entering this ICE trade right now.

Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   03/27/2001 02:08 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: ICE deal not in

Kate,
So far, know you all are still inputting deals:

ICE broker   3/27/01
Enron Buys Reliant Energy Ser
Jul-Sept
355.00
Sp15

thanks


I gave the Kevin the OK and he was going to prepare a waiver letter.  Our
conversation was some time ago.  Sara

Carol St Clair
03/20/2000 08:53 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Western Resources

Sara and Shari:
Could you please take a look at this and let me know waht you think?  Thanks.
Carol
---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2000
08:52 AM ---------------------------

"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM> on 03/18/2000 04:06:43 PM
To: <carol.st.clair@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Western Resources

Carol:  How are you?  I hope you are doing well.  I took a guess at your
E-mail address based upon all of the others I have for your ENA Legal
compatriots, so hopefully this will get through to your desktop.

One of my partners, Warren Ingber, has been asked to pick up on some work
that Kevin Leitao was handling for Western Resources involving a  trading
contract between ENA and Western Resources.  As I think you know, Kevin
recently left us to take a position with GE Capital.  Warren asked me if the
conflict waiver had been cleared with ENA and that is the reason for my
E-mail.  Warren informed me that the draft that had been forwarded to him had
indirectly come from Jeff Sorenson and that you were copied on the
correspondence.

In a number of cases in the past involving these types of contracts, ENA has
granted us waivers to represent the particular ENA counterparty.  I think the
general consensus was that ENA would rather have us represent the
counterparty, rather than another outside firm, since Kevin in particular had
been working with various ENA lawyers on a number of the issues that
frequently arise under these agreements and that it was more efficient (and
beneficial to the overall transaction) to work with a firm that had
familiarity both with respect to the issues as well as ENA's general views on
them.  Also, it is my understanding that the provisions are somewhat well
accepted and that it is unusual for there to be difficult legal
negotiations.  I know that Kevin had from time to time cleared these
representations on a case by case basis with the various ENA lawyers involved
(for e.g., I know there were one or more transactions in which Shari and Sara
were involved) and would let me know how we were proceeding.  My memory is
failing me on this one, although I seem to recall that the conflict had been
waived a while ago.  However, I just want to make sure that that was in fact
done in this case.

Could you let me know if my recollection is accurate or if you foresee any
problem in this respect.  Our contact at Western Resources said he understood
the conflict matter had been dealt with a while ago.  Obviously, we do not
want to take on a representation of this nature without ENA's consent.

I will be out of the office during the early part of the week, but I will be
checking E-mail and voice mail regularly.  My phone number is 212 424-8125.
Thanks again, Carol.

John


Steve -

Just wanted to let you know things are progressing nicely on the Houston
Video.  Mark Palmer's group have given me support on the video copy and Beth
Stier has stayed in contact with the video company to ensure quality for us.

I will set up some time to go over the mock up with you later this week.

Hope all is well with you.

Traci

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Tara Osborn  [mailto:tara@nion-is.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 6:11 PM
To: twarner@enron.com
Subject: Main menu mock

Traci,

Good morning. I have worked up a "mock" for the  main menu for the Houston
Project we are working on. This will come onto the  screen after the video,
you will us it to navigate to your custom page.

If you could please take a look at the mock at this
link:http://www.nionis.com/houston/index.htm

Please let me know your feedback.

Thank you,
Tara

Tara Osborn
Multimedia Developer
NION  Interactive Solutions
1301 Capital of Texas Highway Suite B-310
Austin,  Texas 78746
(512) 306-1442 ext. 106


Guys, I spoke with Mark this morning.  He is very supportive of the structure
and idea.  I had indicated that he would continue to run the producer
services business in the West but would also be part of the overall team as
we plot out strategy in the West.  He wants to stay in Denver which I think
we should be able to accomodate as long as his group stays integrated into
the overall team.  I had indicated that we would consolidate market making
into Houston and Paul Lucci could decide if he wants to continue trading or
not - if so he needs to move to Houston.

 Phillip/Barry, go ahead and start working with Mark as you develop your
plans going forward.  I will be speaking to Stephanie Miller this week and
will give the green light with her shortly.

Regards
Delainey


Greetings:

My name is John Forney and I am currently an employee of Enron North America.   I am a Woodlands resident and take great interest in employment opportunities withyour company.  I have been involved, primarily,  in electricity and gas trading.     I also have gas purchase and natural gas pipeline experience.
 I have a proven track record of success and look forward to new challenges.

I have attached my resume which details my  experience and capabilities.    If you have further interest in talking with me,  please contact me at 713-853-7160 or 281-419-4388.

Thanks for your time,

John Forney
Director,  Ercot Trading


TODAY'S HEADLINES
The New York Times on the Web
Wednesday, February 6, 2002
------------------------------------------------------------
For news updated throughout the day, visit www.nytimes.com

QUOTE OF THE DAY
=========================
"We have to be concerned about not focusing too much on
America. We have to emphasize the rest of the world. The
world expects an international event."
-DON MISCHER, producer of the Olympics' opening ceremony, on the impact of
Sept. 11.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/olympics/06FLAG.html?todaysheadlines

NATIONAL
=========================
Lindh Coerced After Capture, Lawyers Assert

Lawyers for John Walker Lindh, the American captured with
the Taliban, said he was harshly treated in coercive
conditions by his American captors.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/national/06LIND.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Convict's DNA Sways Labs, Not a Determined Prosecutor

A district attorney in Pennsylvania is refusing to let a man
convicted of rape out of prison despite DNA evidence
proving him innocent.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/national/06DNA.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Fraying Ties With Blacks, Los Angeles Mayor Opposes Rehiring
Police Chief

Mayor James K. Hahn of Los Angeles opposed giving a new
contract to Police Chief Bernard Parks, angering many local
African-American leaders.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/national/06ANGE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE NATIONAL NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/national/index.html?todaysheadline

/--------------------- ADVERTISEMENT ---------------------\
A floor lamp that spreads sunshine all over a room

The HappyEyes (TM) Floor Lamp brings the benefits of
natural daylight indoors for glare-free lighting that's
perfect for a variety of indoor activities.

http://ads.nyt.com/th.ad/th-technoscout14/happytext.html/?_RM_REDIR_=http://www.technoscout.com/general/product/product.asp?product=603&Prod_Name=Happy_Eyes_Floor_Lamp&site=80605
\---------------------------------------------------------/

INTERNATIONAL
=========================
Powell Says U.S. Plans to Work Out Binding Arms Pact

The United States expects to meet Russia's demand for a
"legally binding" agreement on reducing their nuclear
stockpiles by roughly two-thirds, the secretary of state
said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/international/06DIPL.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Yemen Says It Is Pursuing 2 Men Wanted by the U.S.

President Ali Abdullah Saleh said that he was depending for
the moment on tribal chieftains to locate the men and
persuade them to surrender.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/international/middleeast/06YEME.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Terror Acts by Baghdad Have Waned, U.S. Aides Say

The Central Intelligence Agency has no evidence that Iraq
has engaged in terrorist operations against the United
States in nearly a decade.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/international/middleeast/06INTE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE INTERNATIONAL NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/world/index.html?todaysheadline

BUSINESS
=========================
Enron Executives Say They Debated Freeze on Pension

Before they temporarily barred employees from selling
company stock, Enron executives debated delaying the
moratorium because employees could suffer losses.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/business/06ENRO.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Deloitte Is Last Big Audit Firm to Revamp Consulting
Business

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu announced that it would separate
its accounting business from its consulting business in
response to growing pressure in the wake of the Enron
collapse.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/business/06AUDI.html?todaysheadlines

-----

2 Big Names Said to Drop Idea of Bidding for WorldCom

Verizon and SBC Communications each considered bidding to
acquire WorldCom, but backed out amid concerns that
WorldCom's core long-distance businesses face continued
difficulties.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/business/06PLAC.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE BUSINESS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/business/index.html?todaysheadline

TECHNOLOGY
=========================
Auction Sites in Japan Fear Move to Limit Online Sales

The Japanese National Police Agency is circulating a
proposal to require sellers of used goods through Internet
auctions to obtain licenses.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/technology/06AUCT.html?todaysheadlines

-----

2 Big Names Said to Drop Idea of Bidding for WorldCom

Verizon and SBC Communications each considered bidding to
acquire WorldCom, but backed out amid concerns that
WorldCom's core long-distance businesses face continued
difficulties.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/business/06PLAC.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Not in Finland Anymore? More Like Nokialand

Nokia's impressive growth has some Finns wondering if they
have not, in fact, exchanged one master  the Soviet Union
for another.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/international/europe/06NOKI.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE TECHNOLOGY NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/technology/index.html?todaysheadline

POLITICS
=========================
Bush Plans Early Warning System for Terror

President Bush said that he envisioned a broad emergency
alert system to warn the country of biological attacks.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/politics/06BUSH.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Economic Recovery Package on Brink of Dying in Senate

The Senate moved to the brink of abandoning efforts to pass
an economic recovery package.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/politics/06BUDG.html?todaysheadlines

-----

House Speaker Schedules Vote Next Week on Campaign Finance
Overhaul

Speaker J. Dennis Hastert announced that the House would
vote next week on long-stalled campaign finance
legislation.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/politics/06DONA.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE POLITICS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/index.html?todaysheadline

SPORTS
=========================
Baseball Won't Drop Teams This Season

Unable to hurdle legal roadblocks, Major League Baseball
abandoned its plan to eliminate the Minnesota Twins and the
Montreal Expos for the coming season.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/sports/baseball/06BASE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Same Old Knight Getting Results

Still volatile and still brilliant, Bob Knight has led Texas
Tech to a 16-4 record in his first season as head coach of
the Red Raiders.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/sports/ncaabasketball/06KNIG.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Knicks Let One Get Away

After building an 18-point lead in the third   quarter, the
Knicks suffered a huge letdown that resulted in an
embarrassing loss to the Clippers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/sports/basketball/06KNIC.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE SPORTS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/sports/index.html?todaysheadline

ARTS
=========================
Two New Leads Are on the Way to 'The Producers'

The producers of the blockbuster musical confirmed on
Tuesday that the matinee on March 17 would be the last
performance for Nathan Lane and Matthew Broderick.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/arts/theater/06PROD.html?todaysheadlines

-----

A Curator Defends His Show Exploring Nazi Imagery

"We have a duty to show new ideas and concerns about the
Holocaust," says Norman L. Kleeblatt, curator of fine arts
at the Jewish Museum.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/arts/design/06CURA.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Ferreting Out the Loopholes in Oscar Rules

The guidelines for Oscar campaigns cover 13 points. The ways
around them are many.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/movies/06OSCA.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE ARTS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/arts/index.html?todaysheadline

NY REGION
=========================
CBS to Broadcast Videotape Shot Inside Towers During Attack

CBS announced that it would broadcast a documentary culled
from the videotape footage shot inside the World Trade
Center on Sept. 11.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/nyregion/06TAPE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Ex-Head of Harlem Charity Is Arrested

Lorraine Hale and her husband, Jesse DeVore, were charged on
Tuesday with misappropriating more than $1 million from
Hale House.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/nyregion/06HALE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Bloomberg Passes Hat, Aiming at Corporate Help

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, seeking ways to help the city
narrow a budget gap, wants to offer corporate naming rights
for city parks and stadiums.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/nyregion/06BLOO.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE NY REGION NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/nyregion/index.html?todaysheadline

OP-ED
=========================
Barbie Loves Math
By MAUREEN DOWD
Only 10 years after Mattel put out Teen Talk Barbie whining
"Math class is tough," we have women unearthing the Rosetta
stone of the indecipherable Enron scandal.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/opinion/06DOWD.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Dear Arab League
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
President Bush should tell the Arab League members that they
are the ones with the power to reshape Arab-Israeli
relations, not the United States.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/opinion/06FRIE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Choosing the Right Enemies
By MICHAEL O'HANLON
We will harm our national security if we fail to appreciate
the great differences among the three countries President
Bush called the "axis of evil."
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/opinion/06OHAN.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE OP-ED  NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/opinion/index.html?todaysheadline

HOW TO CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
------------------------------------------------------------
You received these headlines because you requested The New
York Times Direct e-mail service. To cancel delivery,
change delivery options, change your e-mail address or sign
up for other newsletters, see http://www.nytimes.com/email.
Check or uncheck the headlines you would like to receive
and remember to go to the bottom of the page and click on
"Save Selections." To change your e-mail address, go to our
help center: http://www.nytimes.com/help.  Suggestions and
feedback are welcome at feedback@nytimes.com.

Please include the following ID number when writing to
feedback@nytimes.com so that we can track any reports of problems:
1120577

HOW TO ADVERTISE
------------------------------------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or
other creative advertising opportunities with The New York
Times on the Web, please contact onlinesales@nytimes.com or
visit our online media kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo


I'd love to talk but I never see you.  I assume you are doing the big
catholic thing for easter (not).  I, of course, will be in San Diego.

Just give me some nights that work for you in the next couple weeks...

Have a good weekend!!

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From:  Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 4:57 PM
To: Cameron Sellers
Subject: Re: you & me & ian

let's talk and figure out a time.  i'm off for school now.
Best,
jeff

Cameron

Sellers              To:     "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'"

<cameron@perf        <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>

ect.com>             cc:

Subject:     you & me & ian

04/12/2001

05:44 PM

I would love for you to meet our new VP of Professional Services (who is,
incidentally, now for all intents and purposes running our company).  I
think you will love him.  He is very interested in the idea of working with
Enron and I want you to meet him.  Can we set up a dinner for the three of
us sometime in the next couple weeks?  I know your schedule is busy with
school, so why don't you tell me a couple nights that work (other than
Mondays) and I will make it work on our end.  Please oh please.

Love,

Your Pal Cameron

P.S.  Going to Colleen's new (to me) place for some wine tonight.  I'll
tell
her hello for you?

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)


1. Change the bold in 1. to "for any reason other than an event of Force
Majeure having the effect of rendering customer unable to accept any volumes
at the primary delivery point during the continuation of such event of force
majeure.

2.  in 1 say that demand charges shall not exceed .055.   Also put in there
that we will provide customer with a copy of Koch's transportation invoice to
verify what we are charged for deficient volumes.

3.  Add a sentence at the end of no.1 that says that "Provided that prioir to
Company's incurring those incremental gas transportation and/or gas supply
costs, customer agrees to pay the incremental amount. "   (they want us to
notify them first and have them agree before we schedule the gas to them)

4.   On the contract, in the definition of Force Majeure they want to add
"for any reason including but not limited to operational or economic reasons"


I would like to talk to this guy and have him meet with Phyllis and Ron.

Kalen - can you get him in here for an interview.

David W Delainey
10/04/2001 11:11 AM
To:	Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Sean A Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, Suresh Raghavan/HOU/EES@EES, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Kalen Pieper/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Arora/HOU/ECT
Subject:	Resume - for your perusal

Fyi, action
Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/EES on 10/04/2001 11:09 AM ---------------------------
From:	Harry Arora/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/03/2001 05:01 PM
To:	David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	Resume - for your perusal

Dave

One of my close friends is looking for a job. He has been in strategy consulting for the last four years, first for Mckinsey and then for Accenture. He is a very smart guy and has great business sense. I have known him for a long time, great guy and can get things done.
He is a business strategy and restructuing guru. Gurmeet had a baby and he is very keen in moving out of consulting. I am enclosing his resume here and I am going to take the liberty of asking him to give you a call. Will appreciate your taking a look.

Harry