Good Afternoon Fred,

After our call, a better solution presented itself to me.  The best quality of information regarding prescheduled deals done by EPE would come from EPE directly to Enron's real time group.

Please see the following prototype sheet that I have made, I have checked with Bill and Greg, and they both agree that this format will give Real time the hourly shapes that they need, with tag numbers referenced for use only if problems occurr.  This sheet could be created and sent after the E-tag deadline has passed, giving EPE's group ample time to get all the information that they need before Real time would ever need it.

Since E-tag is a fact of life for all of us now, we would benefit the most by building E-tag into our solution.  By comparing the E-tags that EPE recieves to the volumes they have with other counterparties, EPE has the benefit of a cross check without adding a layer of work to themselves.  Enron would benefit by still understanding the quantity of generation and load that the real time desk needs to see, without adding a burden of repetitive work to our already overloaded preschedulers.

Having EPE generate this abbreviated sheet for EPMI real time would still give excellent quality of information without many of the logistics hurdles that we currently have.

Please take a look at this sheet, and see how you like it.  Real time would also gain benefit by having the name and phone number of the person designated to be "On Call" for that day.

I welcome any questions or comments:

Cara Semperger
West Power Scheduling Supervisor
503/464-3814


The other memo will follow shortly from Maureen.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 06/12/2001
09:07 AM ---------------------------
From: Sherri Sera/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/11/2001 04:51 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Draft of Organizational Announcement

Steve, Kevin Garland sent this to me hoping to get Jeff's approval to send it
out from the office of the chairman.  Would it make sense to incorporate it
into the memo you're working on?  Please advise.  Thanks, SRS

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Garland, Kevin
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Sera, Sherri
Subject: FW: Draft of Organizational Announcement

Announcing the Formation of One Corporate Equity Investing Unit

To better develop and manage equity investment opportunities related to our
core businesses, Enron has formed one corporate equity investment unit.  This
new unit, Enron Principal Investments, will combine the existing investment
units of ENA, EBS and Enron Investment Partners.  Additionally, the Enron
Special Asset Group will also become part of Enron Principal Investments.
The strategy of Enron Principal Investments will be to work with all the
business units of Enron to identify, execute, and manage equity investments,
which leverage Enron's unique and proprietary knowledge.   These investments
may be in the form of venture capital, LBO's, traditional private equity and
distressed debt positions.

Kevin Garland will serve as Managing Director, overseeing all activities of
Enron Principal Investments.  Gene Humphrey, Michael Miller, Dick Lydecker,
and their groups, will join Kevin and his group to form Enron Principal
Investments.  This new business unit will report to an investment committee,
consisting of Greg Whalley, Ken Rice and Dave Delainey.

 Please join me in congratulating and supporting Kevin, Gene, Michael, Dick
and the other members of this group in this effort.

Jeff Skilling


Dear Fellow UH Law Center Alumni and Friends:

The new dean of the Law Center, Nancy Rapoport, is coming to Enron for a meet
and greet with Enron's UH Law Center Alumni and friends on Tuesday, March 6
at 8am in the 50M Dining Room.

Dean Rapoport has been visiting all of the big law firms and law departments
in an effort to introduce herself to the Houston legal community.  She has
promised to give us a briefing on her vision and plans for the Law Center.  I
have met the Dean already, and she is very impressive.  She should really
invigorate the place.

Please RSVP by responding to this email or by calling Jim Grace at x57702.

Also, please examine the address list.  If you see that any UH grad has been
missed, please forward this on that person.  Thanks.


This deal has an SP 15 delivery point with firm energy.

Thanks!


Attached is the final, marked copy of the Ormet/Enron transaction agreement.
Please let me know if you have any comments.  Otherwise, if you have none, I
will begin having final drafts executed by Ormet.
Thanks,
Mike

 - Enron_Doc.doc


Benjamin:

>My name is Ben Rogers and I am currently applying to
The Texas Business School.
I am coming to visit the
school on Friday, Feb. 18th and was wondering if you had time to talk to
me about the Energy/Corporate Finance Program.

I would be pleased to meet with you in the morning hours of Fri.

Ehud Ronn

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Department of Finance
     College and Graduate School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


Enjoy!!
X-Apparently-To: ronniegiron@yahoo.com via web10108; 26 Jan 2002 13:00:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Track: 1: 40
Received: from 63.175.134.130  (EHLO communicator.miamiair.com) (63.175.134.130)  by mta456.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Jan 2002 13:00:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Edward Parson <EParson@miamiair.com>
To: "Jimmy Tovar (E-mail)" <jtovar@powerfm.hn>
Cc: "Jimmy Parson (E-mail)" <jparson539@cs.com>, "Luis Aviles (E-mail)"	 <oporto00@hotmail.com>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ronnie_Gir=F3n_=28E-mail=29?=	 <ronniegiron@yahoo.com>
Subject: wow...
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 15:57:33 -0500
Content-Length: 485596
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_E6BBB676.26472D7F"

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Alric Brown
> Sent:	Saturday, January 26, 2002 3:56 PM
> To:	Edward Parson
> Subject:	FW:
>
>
>
>
>  <<1-1.jpg>>  <<1-2.jpg>>  <<2-1.jpg>>  <<2-2.jpg>>  <<3-1.jpg>>
> <<3-2.jpg>>  <<4-1.jpg>>  <<4-2.jpg>>  <<4-3.jpg>>  <<5.jpg>>  <<6-1.jpg>>
>  <<6-2.jpg>>

 - Part.001
 - 1-1.jpg
 - 1-2.jpg
 - 2-1.jpg
 - 2-2.jpg
 - 3-1.jpg
 - 3-2.jpg
 - 4-1.jpg
 - 4-2.jpg
 - 4-3.jpg
 - 5.jpg
 - 6-1.jpg
 - 6-2.jpg


Vince

Thank you for the update.  I will be back in the office January 8.

Have a great New Year

Gerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 5:35 PM
To: gsheble@iastate.edu
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Subject: RE: Hello

Gerry,

Let me review my calendar in the beginning of the next year and I shall
E-mail you
with a suggested date. My assistant will update my schedule for 2001 in the
first week
of January and I shall be able to select a date for ypur presentaton.

Vince Kaminski

"Sheble, G.B." <gsheble@iastate.edu> on 12/21/2000 10:43:50 AM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Hello

Dear Mr. Kaminski

Please excuse the cancellation due to illness.  The students do not care
who
they infect near the end of the semester, they just want to get done!

Here is my available schedule for next year.  I am now overloaded next week
with tasks to complete the semester.  I do hope that we can reschedule
during the first quarter next year.

I would note that my schedule is most free for Thursday or Friday.  I could
fly out late Wednesday night.

Cordially,

Gerry

Teaching Schedule
M 11-12
T and R 10-12 and 2-4
T 12-2 EP&ES Seminar
M 6-8
T 6-8
W 6-8
(R=Thursday)
Workshops:
Jan 12-13 Des Moines
Jan 26-27 Des Moines
Feb 9-10  Des Moines

IEEE WPM Conference
Feb 28-31 Columbus, Ohio


This message is being sent by Michael Hoffman's assistant, Etta
Kolombatovich:

Thank you for organizing the generator group.

As requested, please find my address, etc.

Michael Hoffman
Senior Managing Director
The Blackstone Group
345 Park Avenue, 28th Floor
New York NY 10154
Tel:  212/583-5858
Fax:  212/583-5724
email:  hoffman@blackstone.com

Please feel free to contact me.

Best regards,

Michael Hoffman


Group,

Two totally different issues for you.

First:  When scheduling transmission on Portland General Electric from John Day to Malin we MUST use deal #146517, we MUST make the price zero.  We extend this deal in scheduling and change the delivery points.  We then make an annuity to ST-NW for losses.  Easy.

Second: For the third time in two weeks the behavior of the Real-Time Group after 6 PM has been brought up.  We will talk more regarding this in our meeting next week.  It is important to note that we need to remain within the bounds of professional behavior at all times.  Enron has a zero tolerance policy regarding harassment (language or behavior that offends or belittles others).

Thanks for your attention.

Bill


SPG Brands
Save 35%  	at resorts & destinations worldwide

		 [IMAGE]
	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
 Join  Starwood Preferred Guest(SM)! Enjoy 35% off  some of the most desired resorts and destinations around the world when  you join Starwood Preferred Guest. Experience the Princeville in  Hawaii...The Westin Regina Resort in Cancun...the Sheraton San Marcos Golf  Resort in Arizona.  As a member you'll  receive the incredible savings, special offers and rewards, exclusively  for Starwood Preferred Guests. Anytime.  Anywhere(SM). Click the button  to the right to take advantage of 35% off when you join Starwood Preferred  Guest.  		 When making your reservations by  phone,  please call 1-877-STARWOOD.

  If you would like to receive future e-mails in text-only format,  click here .  You are subscribed as: jeff.skilling@enron.com   If you would like your e-mail to be sent to a different address, please click here .  Click here  to review the Starwood  Preferred Guest privacy statement.   Click here  to review the Starwood  Preferred Guest program terms and conditions.  You have received this email from Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. If you prefer not to receive future promotional mailings from Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., please  click here . It may take up to 10  business days to completely remove you from our e-mail list. There is a slight chance  that you may receive e-mail from us within that time.

[IMAGE]


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2000 04:23
PM ---------------------------

John Arnold
05/22/2000 04:23 PM
To: Doug.rotenberg@enron.com
cc: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, John.J. Lavorato@enron.com, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject:

Doug:
To confirm the pricing of the LNG dela::

I can show a $3.01 bid for the Nymex portion of 160,000 mmbtu/day for the
time period Jan 2003-Dec 2014.  The bid on Henry Hub basis for same time
period is -$.0025 resulting in fix price of $3.0075; the bid on Sonat basis
is -$.0175 translating into a bid of $2.9925.

Notional volume = 70,128 contracts.
PV volume = 37,658 contracts.
Exposure per $.01 move = $3,760,000

John


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2001
05:39 PM ---------------------------

Pinnamaneni Krishnarao
05/04/2001 04:48 PM
To: Praveen Mellacheruvu/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, William Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Research Intelligence Article

My corrections are in blue.
Krishna.

Praveen Mellacheruvu@EES
05/04/2001 02:22 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, William Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Research Intelligence Article

I have attached the article to be published in the next issue of Research
Intelligence for your perusal.
Please do provide me with your comments on the same.

Praveen.


I am missing the following deals for Mike Swerzbin per Amerex:

B  American Electric Power  250  MID C  4/1/01- 6/30/01 25  off    23,775
$.0075 fee

S  Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc.  175  NP 15  10/1/01- 12/31/01 25
on    30,800    $.0075 fee

B  TransAlta Energy Marketing (U.S.) Inc.  260  MID C  3/1/01- 3/31/01 25
off    7,800     $.0075 fee


My cell phone is charging in the car but I will have my pager on if you need me.  My pager number is 877-498-5497.

Remember, I can only see numeric messages.

Have a nice day.


Attached is a revised draft of the term sheet for the equity Funding of Enron
Net Works Partners, L.P.  The draft has been circulated to potential third
party investors and comments are anticipated this week.


I am pleased to announce that as detailed below, we now have an ISDA in place
between Westpac and ENA. Trading between these parties can resume as far as
Legal is concerned.

David Minns is working on finalizing the ISDA between Enron Australia and
Westpac based on the above agreement. I would expect that to be concluded
shortly.

Shari

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000 12:49
PM ---------------------------

Susan Flynn
04/20/2000 10:09 AM
To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R
Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela
Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Souad
Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruce
Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Charlie Hoang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yolanda
Cordova-Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E
Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect,
Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin P Radous/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Westpac Banking Corporation

 We have received the following executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract: ISDA Master Agreement ( Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:  April 12, 2000

Enron Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:     Westpac Banking Corporation

Transactions Covered:   Approved for all products except:          pulp and
paper and weather

PLEASE NOTE:   The Counterparty is the Calculation Agent.   The Counterpary
has three (3) Local Business Days after the receipt of a Confirmation from
ENA to accept or dispute the Confirmation.


The report named: Power West Price Peak <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=30&report_name=Power+West+Price+Peak&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/23/2001>, published as of 10/23/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


missing deal

trader??   sorry
buying aep
108.50
25 mw
pv
cal 02

thanks


Sheila:  ENA is ready to sign (Ihope) in the a.m.  I just wanted to verify
that you had sent an email to Cassandra (or Rick Buy) so that she is prepared
to countersign.

Also, your status report reflects that you also need a custody agreement for
ECT Investments.  Why?

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Thought you might be interested in this.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 01:42 PM -----

	Leslie Hansen
	07/10/2000 10:14 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: AlphaTrust: Providing a Legal Framework for Electronic Signatures

Mark:

What do you know about the issue of electronic signatures?  Is this service
or a similar service something we should further explore?

Leslie
----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 10:11 AM -----

	Dave Samuels
	07/10/2000 09:58 AM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: AlphaTrust: Providing a Legal Framework for Electronic Signatures

I received this solicitation from this company last week.  Do we have any
interest in discussing anything further with them?  (all of the attachments
appear to be messed up, but the website provides more detail)

thanks
Dave

---------------------- Forwarded by Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 09:54
AM ---------------------------

Randall Whitfield <Randall.Whitfield@AlphaTrust.com> on 07/07/2000 04:51:30 PM
To: "'Dave Samuels'" <Dave.Samuels@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: AlphaTrust: Providing a Legal Framework for Electronic Signatures

Dave,
Thank you for the prompt reply.
There are many areas where electronic signatures can reduce business costs
and enable new applications.  But, most importantly Enron and Enron Online
needs to know they can trust an electronic signature.  AlphaTrust can
serve as the 3rd party managing your electronic signatures including risk
management.  There are many costs associated with implementing an
electronic signature service with the polices and legal requirements.  And
typically there can be a 12-18 month time frame to implement.

AlphaTrust provides the infrastructure,
AlphaTrust provides the legal framework and fraud protection across all
jurisdictions including internationally,
AlphaTrust can enable your business to get started quickly.

I will call you next week to follow-up.  If you like we can coordinate a
call with your legal counsel and my CEO who understands the laws to a
great extent.

Thank you,
Randall Whitfield
p. 214.290.1905
randall.whitfield@alphatrust.com
This e-mail is electronically signed. As a prudent business practice, we
electronically sign e-mail, and prefer that our customers and business
partners do as well. For information please visit:
http://alphatrust.com/e-signed-mail.asp

 - AlphaTrust ESIGN Sum.doc
 - AlphaTrust Service sum.doc
 - Policy Issues in E-commerce Applications - BBTEs.pdf


On Sunday, the new Fortune magazine was a roadway for my two-year old's
cars.  On Monday, my sixteen year-old used the cover to cut out pictures of
money for a school project.  Last night, the magazine made it into my hands
around midnight when everything at home was settled in for the night.  What a
nice article!  I smiled while reading it.  How nice to see your
accomplishments recognized in print.  Congratulations.  I hope that you have
plenty of copies for your mom and dad.  --Sally


yes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Conwell, Wendy
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 10:21 AM
To:	Zufferli, John
Cc:	Davies, Derek; Pernul, Sarah
Subject:	BP Corporation North America Transactions

John,

Are we papering ECC's financial trades with BP Corporation North America (BPCNA) under the ISDA that we have between ENA and BPCNA and just back to backing our trades between ENA and ECC???  I am not trying to be a pain in the butt...but... I just want to make sure we are covered.  Please advise.

Wendy


7-May	8-May	9-May	10-May	11-May	14-May	15-May	16-May	17-May	18-May	21-May	22-May	23-May	24-May	25-May
Aluminum	0	11	15	8	11	6	13	7	0	0	7	7	8	2	0
Copper	0	5	14	3	4	2	3	3	5	5	14	8	2	5	1
Gas	4	6	9	1	5	3	3	15	5	6	14	19	8	5	8
Total	4	22	38	12	20	11	19	25	10	11	35	34	18	12	9

Note: Transactions are in pairs, therefore the number of gas transactions for May 25 is 10 etc.


Auction Doesn't Get Much

A contact of mine at the ISO told me that the auction "didn't get much" and
the bids weren't "at the Governor's price".  NPR today in SF reported that
the Governor planned to negotiate the price in the bids (reported to average
6.9 cents) to a lower number.

PX Stay

CA Court issued a one-week stay preventing the PX from selling the IOUs'
block forward position (to raise cash) when notified by the Attorney General
that the Governor may want to obtain the value of the contracts.

Attorney General Orders Exisiting ISO Board to Resign

The CA Attorney General notified the existing, FERC-approved, ISO Board
Members by letter on Wednesday (1/24) that he had filed a complaint in court
and expected each of them to tender their resignation by Thursday (1/25).  He
stated that AB5 had superceded the past state law and led to creation of the
new Board appointed by the Governor.  If any Board member fails to notify the
AG today, he will assume that he or she does not intend to relinquish their
position and the AG "will proceed to serve and prosecute the complaint."  The
Board meets in Executive Session today. The only rumor I heard was for a mass
resignation. Joe Hartsoe and Ron Carroll report that FERC does not intend to
get involved at this time.  The WPTF is considering an injunction.

Governor Davis' ISO Board (DISOB)

The "new" Board met and admitted they know nothing about the details of the
ISO.  The chair is Michael Kahn (he has been replaced on the Oversight Board
by Cary Doan.  The ISO informed the DISOB that FERC was expecting a filing on
Jan 31 describing its market re-design.  The DISOB decided to file a notice
with FERC saying it has a new Board and can't meet the deadline, and
promising a progress report in 60 days.  Board Member Mike Florio reported
thatn Bill Julian in the GOvernor's office had a little group pulled together
to work on completely changing the ISO's market design.  I found out who's in
the group -- Bill Hogan and other Navigent members.  That's it. The DISOB
also agreed to an 8-hour meeting on 2/1.

Armed State Takeover?

My ISO contact (an individual who was born and raised in the Middle East)
said that the Governor's office has informed the ISO that it has "sheriffs
standing by" to takeover the powerplants if necessary and has already talked
with the union, which has agreed to keep operatig the plants if the takeover
happens.  His comment to me:   "This is like Russia."


John:

Please call me about this matter. Since it is a physical deal, I'll be
helping Jane on this one.

Alan

	John Suttle
	11/27/2000 05:32 PM

		 To: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: credit for Nippon Chemi-con

Sara -

Can you please help Jane in putting credit language into the confirmation of
a Japanese deal?  I have provided a worksheet with credit provisions that
would normally go into a master or an omnibus confirmation.  In this case, it
will be an omnibus.

Please let me know if I can do anything from here.

John

Jane McBride@ENRON
11/27/2000 05:11 PM
To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: credit for Nippon Chemi-con

Hi John,

Thanks for this, just wondering though, how do you usually get from this sort
of table to the actual provisions to include in the contract.  Alan, Mark, is
there any easy way to do this?

Thanks.

Jane

	John Suttle@ECT
	2000/11/28 07:05

		 To: Morten E Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON
		 Subject: credit for Nippon Chemi-con

Morten Erik -

I recommend the credit terms provided in the attached document to be included
in the Nippon Chemi-con contract.  These are industry standard terms for a
counterparty with credentials such as Nippon-Chemi-con, and these industry
standards are what will enable Enron to syndicate the credit risk if we
decide to do so in the future.

After my discussion with Jonathan last week, I think it is clear that Credit
is on the same page with your team in that we recognize the importance of
getting this first deal booked.  I think that in proposing the terms of your
transaction to the counterparty though, Enron can begin educating the market
as to the nature of the credit risk imbedded in the deal structure, and in
doing so, begin setting the same standards we have in our other portfolios.
The attached credit terms are not set in stone, but I think they are a good
place to start.  I will make myself available to you and the counterparty to
discuss the credit terms, and we will be very willing to negotiate the terms
in good faith.

My point is simply that we should not enter into any of these transactions
without fully discussing the credit implications with the counterparty.

Please feel free to call me or write if you have any questions or concerns.

John
x30906


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Mann, Kay
Sent:	Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:49 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	Payment schedule


----- Forwarded by Tom Briggs/NA/Enron on 10/25/2000 08:01 AM -----

	RAISLERK@sullcrom.com
	10/25/2000 07:51 AM

		 To: tom.briggs@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: CEA Update Bad News

Senator Gramm's staff presented to the Senate Ag Committee Republican and
Democratic staff and the Democratic staff of the Senate Banking Committee,
Gramm's proposed changes to the CEA bill. This proposal is quite lengthy,
and includes many amendments most of which were previously discussed with
the House Agriculture Committee, some of which were included in House
Agriculture Committee Saturday Night Draft of 10/8/00. Because of the length
of the document we have only attached the summary that the Gramm staff
provided. In separate e-mails to follow we will send only the pages of the
House-passed bill that were changed by the Gramm proposal. As you know  some
of these provisions include matters objectionable to
Treasury, SEC, CFTC, Chicago and New York Exchanges. Essentially the Gramm
staff has included proposals which would allow retail and agency
transactions as well as language designed to solve the Blackbird problem.
As you also know the view of the Agencies and the Ag Comm is that  some of
these exclusions create loopholes which can allow some market participants
to avoid the new Single Stock Futures regulatory design, the CFTC oversight
of the energy market, and go far beyond the recommendations of the
President's Working Group.
The staffs of the Banking and Agriculture Committees have agreed to meet
tomorrow late morning. We believe at that time the Agriculture Committee
will propose a counter-offer which while addressing the Gramm major concerns
will not adopt his proposal but instead rely on the Treasury proposals. If
Senator Gramm is willing to work off this alternative a negotiation may
result, otherwise it is unlikely that any agreement with Gramm will be
reached. The Agriculture Committee is disinclined to repeat the debates held
in the House Agriculture Comm. consideration of the bill. We welcome your
reaction to the proposal. If you have questions or comments
please do not hesitate to call Mary (973-5907), or George (973-5920). <<Gramm
Summary.pdf>>

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Gramm Summary.pdf


Pleas also send the preranking to Susan Wimberley.
---------------------- Forwarded by Gretchen Jennings/OTS/Enron on 11/28/2000
08:35 PM ---------------------------

Gretchen Jennings
11/28/2000 09:32 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Associates PRC 2000 Year end Review

Mark Russ will be representing Michael Ratner at the PRC on 12/12 and 12/13.
I am looking into the pre-ranking meeting that is supposedly going on now.
However, the Associate Analyst program indicated that this was a pre-ranking
for Associates within EBS.  Please provide your feedback and preranking to
Mark before the PRC on 12/12 and 12/13.

Rod Hayslett

11/27/2000 08:28 AM
To: Gretchen Jennings/OTS/Enron@Enron, Gary P Smith/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Associates PRC 2000 Year end Review

??????    what is she talking about?

---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 11/27/2000
08:29 AM ---------------------------

Wilma Williams@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
11/27/2000 08:12 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Associates PRC 2000 Year end Review

Rod,

The PRC process closed last week.  You should have received information
regarding representing your associates/analysts at a meeting to be held on
the 28th of this month.  If not, you should check with the Associate/Analysts
or HR for this information.

After the pre-ranking meeting, then you should submit the ranking and your
evaluation to Mark for the final Corporate ranking.

Thanks.

Wilma J. Williams
Enron Broadband Services
Corporate Development
PH:  713-853-6603
EB 4514

	Rod Hayslett@ENRON
	11/27/00 07:14 AM

		 To: Wilma Williams/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Associates PRC 2000 Year end Review

When is the PRC?

Wilma Williams@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
11/02/2000 02:51 PM
To: Bryan Kite/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Brian Spector/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Godfrey/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron, Frank Bay/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:

Subject: Associates PRC 2000 Year end Review

Dear Managers,

Mark J. Russ has been selected for the 2000 year-end review to represent an
associate(s) under your management.   In order to do  this effectively, it
is  important that he receive your feedback and ranking as soon as possible.

If you have any questions, please feel free to call Mark at 3-6602 or myself
at 3-6603.

Thank you in advance for your help.

Wilma J. Williams
Enron Broadband Services
Corporate Development
PH:  713-853-6603
EB 4514


Theiler, thought I would drop you a line and let you know how the hunt went.
When Ryan and I got to the ranch, the guide gave us both a bull tag instead
of a cow tag and said we had the run of the ranch and we could shoot anything
we wanted, bulls or cows.  I took your word and didnt shoot your gun, which
was a duel mistake, trusting your word and trusting your gun.  I saw several
big bulls during our 4 day stay on the ranch and am reporting to you that due
to my trust in you, and that jap junk rifle,  I never hit anything. Have you
had anything in your life that would compare to the emptiness and frustration
of shooting at monster bulls for four days and not hitting anything but dirt
and trees?  Not only that, but on the way home, I wreaked my truck and died
on the way to the hospital.  Im in heaven now, and spending my time putting
the mojo hex on all your future hunts.  However, now I know why you always
wanted to hunt with me, cause everyone else that you know and likes to hunt,
you have given the same line of garbage about how good of a hunter you are
and that  your gun shots true.....

Now for the true story.  I didnt shoot a cow, but Ryan did.  I never saw the
30 inch mule deer, but we saw lots and lots of deer and elk.  I can
understand why people pay to hunt on private land.  This ranch was a mixture
of the Vi Vidal and the Baca location.  Lots of big open meadows and


Please join us at our Happy Hour at Day of the  Trader on Dec. 7, from
3:30-7:30, at the Aladdin Resort & Casino in Las  Vegas. (See attached
invitation.) Feel free to pass this along to any of your  colleagues who plan
to attend the conference.
?
If you're not already a subscriber, you  may?access our hourly, daily and
term indexes by?logging on to www.tradersnewspower.com.?Click  on any of the
indexes to sign up for a 30-day free trial. You'll receive outage
information and Eastern market commentary, as well.
?
We're collecting historical prices and volumes for  TVA, ComEd and SPP, in
preparation for an?impending launch  date.
?
We also are gauging interest in WSCC and ERCOT--if  interest and support is
sufficient in either of those two NERC regions, we will  create hourly
indexes there.
?
Feel free to contact me with any questions or  feedback.
?
Bobette Riner
Senior Power Markets  Analyst
TradersNews
713/647-8690
bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com
 - DOT2000invite.doc


It appears that the following interview schedule may work.  Please advise
ASAP if you have a conflict.

 Thurs, April 20,  2000 in EB38c2.
 2:00 p.m.  Sr. Legal Specialists (S. Bailey, S. Flynn, T. Jones)
 2:45 p.m. Carol St. Clair
 3:15 p.m. Sara Shackleton
  3:45 p.m.  Mark Taylor

tm

P.S.   Tana & Susan B., I updated your calendars.


I have NO idea.   Really.  Sincerely.  I thought I understood it, but I may have it all wrong.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:34 PM
To:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: Staffing

I'm not interested.  But is it more, or less, than you described?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:34 PM
To:	Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff; Comnes, Alan
Subject:	Staffing

I may have misspoken this morning when describing the package.  Please contact Rick with any questions concerning the package.


-----Original Message-----
From: scott neal [mailto:scott.neal@worldnet.att.net]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:03 PM
To: jsms1009@cs.com
Subject: RE: Ebay auction

I just sent payment via paypal to jsms1009@cs.com
My mailing address is:

Scott Neal
13603 Pebblebrook
Houston, TX 77079

Thanks,
Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: jsms1009@cs.com [mailto:jsms1009@cs.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:52 PM
To: scott.neal@worldnet.att.net
Subject: Ebay auction

Scott,

Congratulations on winning the two Big 12 Champ tickets.  You may make your
payment of $326 on paypal.com.  I will also need your mailing address, so
please reply to this email and include it for me. If you have any question,
please let me know and I will respond as soon as possible.  Once I get
confirmation that payment has been sent, I will Fedex the tickets to you.

Thanks for bidding.  I hope you enjoy the game.

Jeremy
jsms1009@cs.com


The first product looks good.  We need to consider having one product for
parks and loans.  I think we should make a market in this product.  Let me
know what you think.  Has Laura decided which organization will flip the
deals?


Richard:

To recap our conversation today, those customers that are switching from financial to physical are already on contract and their existing contract allows such a transaction to take place at our discretion.  However, these customers would not have been receiving a label in the past.  Can you please send, via e-mail a list of LDCs that this action is taking place under, and please indicate whether we have had physical customers in this LDC in the past.  Additionally, is someone keeping track of these customers so that when it comes time to send labels we have a list to send to CSC?  Thanks.

Heather


Sally,

It has taken a few weeks for me to write this memo, but I wanted to make sure
that I thanked you for making Todd available to us in London.  Todd was a
great help.  He provided the experience, professionalism and insight that we
were lacking on book splitting team.  Todd did a very good job of moving the
process forward and outlining some projects that need to undertaken in the
future.  I hope that he will have the time to come back to London once or
twice to help evaluate the progress made on his ideas.

Thanks again,

Joe

PS If you have anyone of Todds caliber that needs a new challenge, please let
me know.


barkerde@nmenergy.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

For those that thought CSS (aka CIT) was dead ( NYISO announcement May 2 ,MOU
Mtg Springfield Mass. and C. King's 4/26 E Mail) rejoice, It is alive and well
.See Below>>>>

To:
Subject:  PJM Announces CSS Training Program

Message sent from the pjm-customer-info mailing list at
pjm-customer-info@majordomo.pjm.com:

On June 12, PJM will implement the Collaborative Scheduling System (CSS), a
new
scheduling tool designed to facilitate transaction schedules between New York
and PJM.
CSS will become part of the EES tool now used to schedule transactions from
and
to PJM neighbors.

PJM will offer several two-hour "virtual" workshops to introduce the new
system.
Participants who now use EES and will use CSS are encouraged to attend one of
these workshops.  The dates for the workshops are: May 31 at 10:00 a.m., June
5
at 2:00 p.m. or June 11 at 2:00 p.m. The workshops will be presented on the
internet with audio teleconference.

A complete description of the new tool, the training program, and a
registration
form for the program are available on the PJM web site at
http://www.pjm.com/training/css/css.html

Please DO NOT REPLY to this message. If you have a question for PJM Customer
Relations and Training, please complete and submit this form:
http://www.pjm.com/contact/questions.html

To unsubscribe from this list, send an e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pjm.com
containing only the following line in the body of the e-mail:

unsubscribe pjm-customer-info


Hi Tana,
Per your request, this is the template, which refers to the side letter
agreement, that we are currently using to confirm Allegheny Energy Supply
financial deals until and ISDA is executed.

Thank you,
Kimberly Hundl x31647


Your message

    To:  Tim Collins (E-mail)
    Subject:  Final November Purchase
    Sent:  12/17/2001 9:50 AM

was read on 12/17/2001 1:18 PM.


Mark,

I am not sure I follow this but I will attempt to present my interpretation
of your note.

I am only restrained from trading those items in clause one if I am
responsible for trading them at Enron, and "equities" falls under
"securities" in clause one.
"Equities" fall under clause one and are therefore not included in clause
two. Therefore, since I do not trade equities for Enron, I can trade them on
my personal account.

Brent Crude futures, I would argue, are "financial instruments," included in
clause one. I am not responsible for trading them for Enron. If they fall
under clause one they are not included in clause two. Does this mean, since
they are not in clause two and I do not trade them for Enron, I can trade
them on my personal account?

Perhaps you could give me a call, +44 207 783 4928.

Thank you,

Dave

From: Mark Taylor on 10/11/2000 15:56 CST
To: Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: David Redmond/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter
Crilly/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: issue w/compliance ertificate

This issue was much easier when all we traded were energy commodities,
interest rates and currencies. The older versions of the policy provided that
no Enron employee may trade any energy commodity for the account of anyone
other than Enron.  Beyond that, no Enron employee could trade a commodity
which was within their area of responsibility.  For example, I was not
permitted to trade natural gas futures for my own account but, since interest
rates and currencies are not within my area of responsibility, I could trade
them.  As the scope of our trading activities expanded it became more
difficult to identify the scope of the company's concern, much less to
articulate it.  We did however take a stab at it and the result is below.
This may be an area which could stand some clarification in the next version
of the Policy.

For now, I would suggest that the term "security" highlighted below should be
read to include equities and therefore not one of the commodities covered in
the second numbered clause (i.e. the word "other" refers to items other than
those listed in clause (i)).  The result is that an Enron employee who does
not trade financial instruments, securities, financial assets or liabilities
for Enron may trade them for his or her own personal account.  To take this a
step further, one could argue that an employee who trades the equities of
energy companies for Enron should not trade energy company equities for his
or her own account but could trade other equities - if it were me, I would
certainly make sure that Ted Murphy agreed with my analysis before I did it.
Of course, a wide variety of commodities remain clearly off limits for
personal trading - metals, ag commodities, bandwidth, freight, lumber, among
many others - for all employees.  As I remember it, this was done purposely
and if anyone disagrees with the scope of the policy they would be wise to
discuss the matter with the RAC Group as they make suggestions for Policy
revisions to the Enron Corp. board.

Employee Trading.  No employee of any Enron Business Unit may engage in the
trading of any Position for the benefit of any party other than an Enron
Business Unit (whether for their own account or for the account of any third
party) where such Position relates to (i) any financial instrument, security,
financial asset or liability which falls within such employee,s
responsibility at an Enron Business Unit or (ii) any other commodity,
included in any Commodity Group.

	Cassandra Schultz@ENRON
	11/08/2000 08:32 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: David Redmond/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter
Crilly/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: issue w/compliance ertificate

To: Mark Taylor,  Legal counsel for Market Risk Management

Mark - would you please clarify this issue for us?

Thank you,
Cassandra Schultz.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron on 11/08/2000
08:26 AM ---------------------------

David Redmond@ECT
11/08/2000 03:05 AM
To: Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Araceli Romero/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter
Crilly/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: 3rd Request - RESPONSE NEEDED ASAP - Risk Mgmt. Compliance
Certificate

Cassandra,

Richard asked me to review this document before the traders on the UK Gas
Desk would sign it.

The UK gas desk adheres to all the risk management requirements of this
document. However, in Section VII , Miscellaneous, Employee Trading, the
document would appear to prevent any of us trading equities (amongst other
commodities) on our personal account as Equity Trading is a Commodity Group.
We are unsure if this is the aim of this agreement.

We have asked our compliance officer, Paul Simons to clarify the impact of
this clause for us.

We are not ignoring the document, we are waiting for clarification.

Thank you,

David Redmond


I've changed it to be confirmed. Chris Mallory usually does mostly daily
deals, so his deal blotter probably defaults to no confirm.

Thanks,
kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           02/01/2001 07:00 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: #510352

This deal is entered as not to be confirmed.  It looks like it probably
should be confirmed.  Can you check into this and see what happened?

Thanks!


Don,

Attached is the financial profile for FPLE's development pipeline utilizing
the 44 CTs.  Give me a call once you have reviewed it.

(See attached file: newco development cash flow.xls)
 - newco development cash flow.xls


Sally/Susan:
Thanks for following up, Bill Hogue at AEC is extremely happy with the
reponse that he has received.

Regards
Milnthorp

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           07/07/2000 07:44 PM

To: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: AEC Issues

Rob:  Let me know if you get feedback from AEC that does not indicate that
they are getting what they need.  Susan and Bryce are both very capable and
responsive, so I am confident that AEC's questions can be resolved quickly.
--Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 07/07/2000 08:41 PM
---------------------------

Susan Harrison
07/07/2000 09:10 AM
To: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: AEC Issues

I wanted to provide an update on our progress with AEC.  Bryce Baxter and his
team members have been in contact with Mike Bennett and Bill Hogue to
understand their needs.  We have provided the initial information they
requested (i.e., one month of data), and are awaiting their approval before
completing the analysis on the remaining months.  I am confident that we have
established clear points of contact within Settlements for Mike and Bill and
we will continue to work on solidifying the relationship.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Susan


Change the language on Operations to include ...Coordination of Service and Planning for Transmission ...

Thanks,

Jim
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leboe, David
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:55 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	Final (almost) RTO's slide

Thanks for last week's feedback on the RTO slide.  We would like to go with the following slide assuming you are OK with content.

Please let me know if you are OK with the slide.

Thanks.

 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>

David T. Leboe
Director, Investor Relations
Enron Corp.

Office  713.853.4785
Cell  713.562.2160
Fax   713.646.3002
Pager  877.237.7732
david.leboe@enron.com


Please respond to Bestfares.com Hot Deals  Today's Hottest Travel Deals from Bestfares.com!

This week, we have several different fare sales. Our most aggressive has to be to the state of Florida where the fares start as low as $79 roundtrip through September 13, 2001. Airfares across the eastern U.S. to Orlando, Tampa, Fort Myers, Fort Lauderdale, Miami and West Palm Beach fall into the $115-160 roundtrip range. Most cities across the U.S. to Florida are $198 roundtrip or less. Here are a few sample roundtrip fares: New Orleans to Tampa, $79; Raleigh to Tampa, $97; Buffalo to Orlando, $117; Greensboro to Orlando, $90; Washington (DC) or Baltimore to West Palm Beach, $120; Indianapolis to West Palm Beach, $138; Newark to Orlando, $125; and many more. Visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=15376
FAMILY FARES $98-$158 RT USA/CANADA/MEXICO
We have some outstanding family fares to the 48 contiguous states, Alaska, Hawaii and Mexico. With our coast-to-coast family fares, each adult ticket purchased (we have those on sale too), up to two children ages two through 17 can fly for only $98-158 roundtrip through September 13, 2001. With our Alaska/Hawaii family fares, adults fly for up to 50 percent off the standard published fares and children can fly for $310 roundtrip through September 13, 2001. These destinations include Honolulu, Kona, Maui, Anchorage or Fairbanks. With our Mexico family fares, for each adult ticket purchased, up to two children ages two through 17 can fly for $158 roundtrip through September 13, 2001. Mexican hotspots include Acapulco, Cancun, Guadalajara, Los Cabos, Mexico City, Puerto Vallarta and more. Be sure to take a look at these super hot family fares, so you can go on vacation with your kids and not put a hole in your pocketbook. For our coast-to-coast family fares, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=11653
for our Alaska/Hawaii family fares, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=11664
And, for our Mexico family fares, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=11663
CARIBBEAN SALE FARES FROM $328 THROUGH SEPT. 30, '01
It doesn't get much better than our warm and sunny, relaxing and restful Caribbean sale. Travel to the Caribbean tropics is always a hot topic, and we have some hot deals for you. Get away to the Caribbean islands for a relaxing spring or summer sojourn. Fares begin at only $328 roundtrip for travel through September 30, 2001. You can save up to 50 percent to a selection of 15 Caribbean cities, including Aruba, Bermuda, Cancun, Grand Cayman, Montego Bay, Nassau and four other Bahamian destinations, St. Croix, St. Maarten, St. Thomas, San Juan, and Santo Domingo. You can depart from over 40 U.S. cities in the East Coast and the Southeast from just $328 roundtrip. The average published fares usually range from $658 to $798 roundtrip. From the Midwest, fares are only $428 roundtrip and fares are $458 roundtrip from the West Coast. To delight in Caribbean savings, make a break to
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=647
SEE THE UK IN STYLE WITH AUTO EUROPE'S LONDON CAB
Are you looking to rent one of the most efficient cars in the United Kingdom? If so, consider the London Cab! Auto Europe, a leader in European car rental service for more than 46 years, is now offering self-drive taxicabs, as well as traditional car rentals. The London Cab Self-Drive fleet appeals to a unique group of travelers who want a perfect mixture of style and efficiency. The London Cab comfortably seats six and features an automatic transmission, air conditioning, a six-disc CD changer, radio and cassette player. It comes equipped with a ramp and has space to accommodate a wheelchair. In addition to the London Cab Self-Drive, Auto Europe offers a large selection of cars including prestige and sports cars. Vehicles are available in all major cities, and delivery is also available. Chauffeur driven services can be arranged, featuring hourly, half-day and full-day services. Free cellular phone rentals are also available offering voice mail, and the phone number is assigned prior to your departure from the USA. For more information on all of Auto Europe's services, see
http://www.autoeurope.com/specials.cfm
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-hot_deals-1835631U@hotdeals.bestfares.com
 Copyright 2001 by Bestfares USA Inc. All rights reserved.


Spoke to Nick O'Day.  He and Paul Quilkey already have advanced ideas about
his replacement (something half commercial/half regulatory), and possibly
filled in the interim with a "semi-parttime" consultant.  Tom Briggs came
into my office and is willing to relocate for a year.  I would prefer to have
Tom there, let Paul hire whatever he needs commercially (FYI- Tom's wife is
commercial, and probably could do a "bang up" job for Paul).  I am no
shrinking violet (as you probably know), but have been loathe to impose
myself/my views, at this early date, but I am not thrilled to hear that Nick
has cooked up a solution with Paul that he and I never discussed, after you
and I have talked about Tom, and gotten Tom's interest aroused (it seems
unfair to Tom to tantalise him with job prospects if we are going to take
them back; same issue I suppose you have with Terry).   I think a hybrid
commercial/regulatory role is fine (and Tom could do it).  By the way, the
org. charts do not show it, but Nick has a subordinate, Reg. Aff. Mgr.,
Robert McGrory, already in place.  Nick also suggested Mike Grimes going to
Tokyo on expat assignment (discussed some time ago with Mike, but apparently
not recently).  Your thoughts?  If you can call me after 1000 your time,
would like to discuss.  I think you have successfully killed Terry's mass
meeting in London.  he and I are meeting for a few hours tomorrow morning.
thanks  mcs


EEI's RTO Summaries: Filings, Comments and Answers provides the most
comprehensive coverage of the October and January RTO filings available.

EEI's Energy Delivery-Transmission Group gives you full coverage of the
October and January RTO filings, key stakeholder comments, applicant answers
and FERC rulings.  Convenient electronic format!

Timely, concise summaries of each RTO filing, including:
 - Introductory RTO summary matrix
 - Proposed characteristics and functions
 - How filing comports with Order No. 2000
 - Additional Applicant comments or issues
 - Key intervenor comments or concerns
 - Applicant responses
 - Commission decisions, as available
 - Current national and regional RTO map

Order Now!
Call 1-800-EEI-5453 (U.S. & Canada) or 301-645-4222 (International) to place
your order.

Once payment has been received by EEI, you will receive an e-mail with an
ID/password for access to a dedicated web site. The October and January RTO
Filings Summaries are now available. October and January stakeholder comments
and answers will be available March 2001 and late April 2001, respectively.

RTO Summaries: The October Filings, Comments and Answers
Item # 13-01-04-009
EEI Utility Members:$1295
EEI Associate Members: $1495
List Price: $1695

RTO Summaries: The January Filings, Comments and Answers
Item # 13-01-05-009
EEI Utility Members:$1295
EEI Associate Members: $1495
List Price: $1695

Save $500 and have access to both October and January!

RTO Summaries: The October and January Filings, Comments and Answers
Item # 13-01-06-009
EEI Utility Members:$2090
EEI Associate Members: $2490
List Price: $2890

(Government discounts available. Call for details)

We hope you found this message useful. However, if you'd rather not receive
future e-mails of this sort from EEI, please send a message to
catalog@eei.org.

 - rto_summaries.htm


you spelled sholes wrong.


US Dam Rescues Calif Grid, But Lawmaker Demands More Pwr

09/25/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- California averted a blackout last week with some
help from the federal government.
The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation opened the flowgates at the massive Glen
Canyon dam in Arizona, providing 300 megawatts of power for four hours in the
afternoon of Sept. 18, according to federal officials.
The event illustrated how dependent the Western power grid is on electricity
from U.S. government-owned dams, and highlighted the increasing political
tensions that arise from the use of these assets as competition shakes up the
nation's $215 billion power sector.
At a House Government Reform Committee hearing last Thursday, Rep. Doug Ose,
R-Calif., demanded to know why, if the Bureau of Reclamation was able to help
the state avert a grid emergency, it didn't make electricity available
throughout the summer months when San Diego consumers paid twice as much for
electricity as they did in 1999.
"This administration sacrificed the interests of consumers in San Diego," Ose
declared.
But a Bureau of Reclamation spokesman said last week's emergency marked the
first time the California grid operator had asked for help.
The Interior Department agency was prepared to act further by making power
available from other dams later in the week, but the state's grid operator
didn't ask for power, said the spokesman, Barry Worth.
Under a mandate from the Interior Department to restore riverbank beaches
deemed critical for endangered wildlife, Glen Canyon has been operated for
the last few years in a way that reduces net power production from the dam by
about 900 megawatts.
The doubling of flows last Monday was within the restricted range required by
the Interior Department, Worth said.
But he noted the agency was reluctant to do so out of concern it would
interfere with a summer-long test of the impact on endangered species from
drought-simulated low flows.
"The amount we increased was of concern to us initially because of our test,
but we determined the amount was analogous to monsoonal thunderstorms we
would normally get this time of year," Worth said.
"We wanted to make sure we were protecting our studies," he said.
Nevertheless, Worth noted that power from Glen Canyon doesn't normally flow
to California to begin with. And he emphasized that transmission constraints
don't make the state a natural destination for the dam's power.
Given the configuration of the Western grid, it is easier for California to
get its power from other sources in the region, such as Hoover Dam, Worth
said.
"We responded, but there's a limitation to how much we can (help) to begin
with," he said.
Still, if California asks, the agency is prepared to help by providing power
again, Worth said.

By Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires, 202-862-6647, bryan.lee@dowjones.com


Honey this is the last week for me to change my health plan!  Lets do this
tonight. I truly think we should be on the same one.
Love
me


Tracy Ngo will be preparing credit for an ISDA.  The draft should be sent to
(Steve) Morus at the CP (check the green file because we've done an
omnibus).  You can insert NY law but no other omnibus changes need to be
made.  Thanks.  Sara


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
ALBRECHT, KRISTIN W             BARRY J PEARCE                  Nov 08, 2000
APOLLO, BETH                    FERNLEY DYSON                   Oct 31, 2000
COUSINO, LISA B                 JAMES SCRIBNER                  Oct 27, 2000
JORDAN, MIKE T                  FERNLEY DYSON                   Nov 03, 2000
MASON, HEIDI                    FERNLEY DYSON                   Oct 26, 2000
MCLOUGHLIN, HECTOR              SHEILA H WALTON                 Oct 25, 2000
MURPHY II, THEODORE R           RICHARD B BUY                   Oct 30, 2000
PERLMAN, BETH S                 PHILIPPE A BIBI                 Oct 31, 2000
PORT, DAVID                     THEODORE R MURPHY II            Oct 30, 2000
SCHULTZ, CASSANDRA R            THEODORE R MURPHY II            Nov 03, 2000
SOLMONSON, MARY C               SALLY W BECK                    Oct 31, 2000
STOCK, STEPHEN                  BETH S PERLMAN                  Oct 31, 2000
WALTON, SHEILA H                DAVID OXLEY                     Oct 27, 2000


I will be out on vacation tomorrow.  If you need immediate assistance, please
contact Sarah Domonoske at X52521.

Sarah can transfer you to my cell phone in the case of an emergency.

Thanks,
Shanna


Start Date: 10/28/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102819.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


FYI.  Due to this shut-in, I have taken deal 135714 to zero for the
17th-29th.  If you hear of this point coming back into service, please notify
me.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 02/18/2000
07:10 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary A Hanks                           02/17/2000 03:39 PM

To: Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl D
King/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Earl Tisdale/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Shut-in of meter 0984179 Hoff Heller Unit 22 CDP

Meter 0984179 Hoff Heller Unit #22 CDP was shut-in at approximately 9:20 AM
today (February 17, 2000).

On Wednesday, February 16, the meter was found flowing 25 lb dew point gas.
The pumper was given 24 hours to correct the problem.  On February 17, the
meter was found flowing 40 lb dew point gas.

If you have any questions please call me at 36449.

Thanks
Gary H


Mark -

I've left messages over the past month for several people in Legal, but have received no response; hence this message to you in hopes you can direct me to who I should be talking to.

I believe I'm listed as an officer on various Enron companies, including EPMI, for which I had to be fingerprinted for some type of California regulatory requirements.  Given the level of legal conflict etc. in California, and simply because it seems reasonable that I should understand if I have any exposure by being named an officer, I'd like to discuss it with one of our lawyers.  I've heard of D&O insurance, but really don't know what exactly that's for, whether I'm covered, and why I might even need it.

Of course this isn't something that keeps me up at night, but I would like to understand the significance and potential exposure, if any, of being named an officer of these subsidiaries.

Thanks for your help,

Cassandra.


I just went through a restructuring of my portfolio with Morgan Stanley.  I
think I am fine for now.  Thank you.

"Swearingen, David" <dswearinge@dlj.com> on 05/16/2001 12:35:35 PM
To: "'Stanley Horton'" <stanley.horton@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:

Mr. Horton,

We appreciate your time a few weeks ago and sincerely hope we were able to
clearly convey our disciplined investment approach to you during our
meeting.    We also hope we were able to help you to re-define the term
"risk".   Using our disciplined approach, we have been able to provide our
clients with consistent returns
and avoid negative returns over the course of the past 10 years.  We credit
the success to developing and implementing a very focused and structured
investment plan.

At this point, we would like to have your permission to put together a
proposal for a portfolio which would be constructed upon the same philosophy
and guidelines utilized by Yale University's multi-billion dollar endowment
fund.    The purpose of the proposal would be to show you how we build our
client portfolios
in an attempt to minimize ( if not eliminate ) negative annual returns while
providing above market returns.

We know you would find the proposal interesting and would give you better
insight into how
high net worth individuals, endowments and wealthy family groups construct
their investment
portfolios.

We look forward to hearing back from you.  Have a great day.

Sincerely,

William L Swearingen II  /  Vice President  David J. Swearingen
Credit  First      Credit  First
Suisse Boston      Suisse Boston


Baby,

You're so sweet for emailing me and saying such sweet things!  Do you know
that you brightened up my day?

I only have about 30 hours of school left.  I did okay on my test.  I should
have studied a little more, but I just didn't feel like it.  I'm feeling
comfortable about my project due tomorrow.  I find out tomorrow if I have to
take my optional final because I get my grade pre-final.  I don't know if I
should take the final if I have a B in the class.  I guess I'll figure it
out!

I slept a lot last night - almost 7.5 hours.  So, I feel more up to the
challenge of the next 2 days.  I'm also not as cranky!

I'm gonna send out a lot of the announcements today.  Mom emailed me the
rest of the addresses today, so I'll either do the rest tonight or tomorrow.

I'm going to tell Mom that I'm going to Houston this weekend.  I decided
that I should tell her since I may sign a lease next week.

Anyway, I've gotta continue on my project!

Love you,
Jenn


Dick bought some Agg gas from CNG Field Services Company - deal 143278.
Kimat entered this as TCO pool deal.  The volume is currently 2187 dth per
day.  Dick said this volume should increase tomorrow.

Robert, could you call CNG Field Services and get the upstream info?  They
should give you an agg point - not the IPP pool.

Thanks


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Buerkle, Jim
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:18 PM
To:	Driscoll, Michael M.
Subject:

Jim Buerkle
Manager
Middle Market
Enron North America
121 SW Salmon St. 3WTC 0306
Portland, OR 97204

(503) 464-3832 (Office)
(503) 702-4604 (Mobile)
(503) 464-3740 (Fax)
jim.buerkle@enron.com


Mary,

No I did not receive it but I am not surprised since I did not receive other
emails.  The solutions team had been in the process of reinstalling my
applications to a another laptop and somehow my emails were affected.  Please
forward it to me again.

Thank you so much,

Nancy

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hain, Mary
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 4:57 PM
To: Morales, Nancy
Subject: Re: Wheeling Agreement

I E-mailed it to you.  Didn't you get it.?

From: Nancy Morales/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 02:20 PM CST
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Wheeling Agreement

Dear Mary,

I spoke to you last week with regards to a sample wheeling agreement our team
needed.  Please let me know if you need me to supply any information.  I look
forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Nancy


Hello All-

Attached above are the cover letter and proposed tariff sheets filed by Texas
Eastern yesterday for a June 1 effective date.  The rate changes reflect
under recoveries in their ASA account which tracks their cash-out mechanism
and increased cost of system fuel.  The underrecovery in the ASA account has
increased from $22,000 to over $22,000,000 over the period September 1--March
31.  Texas Eastern claims that this is largely a result of the gaming of
their currently monthly cash-out (which will likely be changed to weekly in
their 637 proceeding).  As a result, Texas Eastern is seeking a waiver of the
annual filing period in order to begin collecting the underrecovery through a
surcharge that would amount to as much as $.0354 from ELA-M3.  Texas Eastern
proposes to begin recovery in June so as to extend the recovery period from
12 months (Dec-Nov) to 18 months (Jun-Nov), which will lower the level of the
surcharge.

We'll review the filing to see if there are any grounds for protest /
comment.  These types of dollars are usually "rubber-stamped" by FERC for
pass-through but the filing to change the recovery time period may give us
some grounds to protest the recovery.

 The full filing can be found at :
http://infopost.link.duke-energy.com/infopost/default.asp?pipe=TE

Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional
information.

Thanks,
Suzanne


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 09:43 AM -----

	Bob Bowen
	10/19/2000 01:31 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Agenda for the JAD session

I know that you will be at a management meeting the exact same time that this
conference is scheduled
to take place, but I was hoping you could assign this task to someone else in
ENA Legal.  As you will note
on the agenda attached below, we have placed the Legal Department at the top
of the agenda after the
introduction to discuss "Legal Implications of the Electronic Marketplace".

This discussion should conceivably include discussions of the following
topics:

Electronic signatures (in particular EnronOnline)
Websites for delivery and executing confirmations (Commodity Logic)
See "XIII Future Trends" on Page 4 of the agenda

Please let me know as soon as possible if this will be possible.  As you can
see, this is a very important
topic for us.  Call me if I can help clarify any points.

One other point - I am assuming that you guys are the head guys for financial
and physical legal decision
making for Houston, Calgary and London.   For your information, there may be
some lawyer types coming from the London
Global Markets group.

Also, JAD means Joint Accelerated Development.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000 01:07 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Technology

	From:  Sarita Das @ ENRON                           10/19/2000 12:33 PM

To: Bob Bowen
cc:
Subject: agenda for the JAD session


Hey Jay,
You still out there?
Let me know what's happening.

thanks...
bert r martin
publications production manager
409.747.7809 office
409.942.6208 alpha pager

 <<...OLE_Obj...>>


Your message

  To:      Swift, Stephen L (PS, CommOps); mike.barnas@ps.ge.com
  Cc:      Jacoby, Ben
  Subject: NorthWestern
  Sent:    Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:17:26 -0500

did not reach the following recipient(s):

mike.barnas@ps.ge.com on Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:22:14 -0500
    The recipient name is not recognized
	The MTS-ID of the original message is:
c=us;a=mark400;p=ge;l=NYSCHX06PSGE0111262322XK6JA9FX
    MSEXCH:IMS:GE:PSSCH:NYSCHX06PSGE 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient


FYI:

I have arranged the following interview schedule and marked your calendars.
(except Paulo - I do not have access to his calendar).  I have reserved EB
1938.  A copy of his resume will be forthcoming.

Thanks!

Shirley

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000
03:42 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
09/20/2000 03:37 PM
To: "Nelson Neale" <neneale@hotmail.com> @ ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Informal Interview with the Enron Research Group

Mr. Neale:

Thank you for responding so quickly.  I have scheduled the following date and
times.  Please let me know if they are convenient for you.

Friday, September 29th:

Vince Kaminski  8:30 AM
Grant Masson  9:00 AM
Vasant Shanbhogue 9:30 AM
Zimin Lu  10:00 AM
Paulo Issler  10:30 AM

Stinson Gibner will be out of the office for 3 weeks beginning Monday, the
25th so he will be unable to interview you.

We should be through between 11:00 - 11:30 AM.  If you have any questions
please feel free to call me.

When you come into the Enron bldg. go to the Security Console and ask
for me.  We are located on the 19th floor and I will meet you at the elevator
lobby on the 19th floor.

Look forward to hearing from you soon.

Regards,

Shirley Crenshaw
713-853-5290

"Nelson Neale" <neneale@hotmail.com> on 09/20/2000 03:18:45 PM
To: Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Informal Interview with the Enron Research Group

Ms. Crenshaw:

Nice to hear from you!  I will be available on the following dates:

Friday September 29 (AM or PM)
Monday October 2 (AM)
Thursday October 12 (AM or PM)
Friday October 13 (AM or PM)

Let me know which of the above dates and times works best for the group.  I
look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,
Nelson Neale

______________________

C. Nelson Neale, Ph.D.
2990 Bissonnet, #9106
Houston, TX  77005
PH: 713-303-5973
neneale@hotmail.com
______________________

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


There is no attachment.  Mark

	Angela Davis@ENRON
	10/02/2000 05:57 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Lay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Investment in WFG Financial Group Partners, LP

Attached is a legal risk memo for the above referenced investment.

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, Suite 3842
Houston, Texas 77002
Tele. (713) 345-8347
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
e-mail:  angela.davis@enron.com


Mr & Mrs. James Rogers
6 Noel Lane
Cincinnati, OH 45243


Sally - just an fyi...  Jeff Hodge requested that we send him the information
below.  Evidently, the FERC has requested that several US wholesale companies
provide a great deal of information to them due to the volatility of natural
gas prices the past few weeks (it is being driven by the California
markets).  Legal got them agree to simply giving them a weighted average
price of gas on the 11th for delivery on the 12th.  It worked out as $24.47
for buys and $18.14 for sales.  This is US physical next day only.

Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 12:39
PM ---------------------------

From:  Sheri Thomas
  12/12/2000 12:30 PM

To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Fercinfo2 (The Whole Picture)

Jeff - please find the average prices below as requested.  Detail is attached
- includes both EOL and non-EOL next day physical trades for ENA.

Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 12:26
PM ---------------------------

From:  Torrey Moorer
   12/12/2000 12:26 PM

To: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Denny
cc:
Subject: Fercinfo2 (The Whole Picture)

Avg Buy = $24.46994 per MMBtu

Avg Sale = $18.1445 per MMBtu


Attached is the latest revision, incorporating comments from the Enron team.
There were some comments which were either discussion points or not readily
decipherable, so those will need to be addressed in the next version.
There's still some harmonization/nit stuff which we will pick up then also.
Hopefully, David Hunt (MDEA's lawyer) and I will hammer out the more
legalistic (yet important) stuff while he is in our office tomorrow.

Ed, maybe we can schedule a call with our local counsel to get some  more
comfort on the authority issue.   In addition, we can ask for an
authority/enforceability opinion from MDEA's counsel.  We'll beef up the reps
as well.

Reagan/David, Ed's availability is best first thing tomorrow (Thurs) morning.

See you soon,

Kay


Corey,

Here's an update, I sent this to Emily earlier today.  Let me know about this
weekend (i.e. the game, tomorrow night, etc. etc.)

Susan

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 04:56
PM ---------------------------

Susan M Scott
09/21/2000 02:38 PM
To: ehillegeist@hotmail.com
cc:
Subject: We have closure! (well, sort-of)

I'm soooo good.  The chosen path was cool, indifference.

So, last night was Steak Night and with Nick and Wilson both in town we had a
really good showing.  I got there about 7:30 with Nick, and the group's size
swelled to about 12+ by 8:30 - 9:00.  About 8:00 I saw Kevin (Ted's pal - the
one you meet a steak night) wandering around LW's obviously in search of
someone.  Can you believe it?  He (Ted) knew I had organized this gathering -
I know that because Nick is working right across from he and Darren and
overheard Darren encouraging Ted's attendance (mind you Ted was not in the
email distribution) - and he had the nerve to come.  Anyway, Kevin saw me and
came over to chat.  He informed me that "our friend Ted should be there
shortly" to which I responded, "You would know better than me at this
point".  The subject was dropped until he felt the need to raise it again.
He asked if Ted and I parted on good terms/ bad terms, etc.  I said there
really weren't any terms, I just hadn't heard a peep out of him for about 2
weeks.  Kevin wanted to know if I was going to break a bottle over Ted's head
and cause a big scene.  When I said no, I think he was genuinely
disappointed.  I said in order for me to do something like that I would have
to care about the "loss" and that, while a week or two earlier I might have
cared a bit more, with each passing day the "loss" seems less and less like
much of a loss.  Kevin told me I was better-off without Ted.  To go even
further, he informed me that there is no way he would ever let a daughter of
his date Ted nor any of his "girl-friends".  He said that while he thought
Ted was a great guy (i.e. fun to be around, good stories, etc.) he wasn't
good dating material.  I agreed with Kevin saying "Ted is a great guy, he
just makes a lousy man" (don't you like that one?).  I then went on to say
"Anyway, I'm destined for bigger and better things, right?".  Kevin: "Much
bigger and much better."  About this time my parents showed up...the plot
thickens.  I introduced Kevin to my parents and since both my Dad and Kevin
were in the Navy and attended Colorado they had much to talk about.  The two
of them had probably been talking for about half an hour when
"dum-da-dum-dum" Ted shows up.  He approaches our group because he sees Kevin
and is forced to make eye-contact with me.  I give him a "hey" and he gives
me the arm squeeze and a much too pleasant "how's it going?".  He asked what
Kevin and my Dad were talking about, I told him the Navy, he said don't get
Kevin started or you'll never shut him up...Then he walked away.  He never
acknowledged my parents nor did he ever speak to me again the rest of the
evening.  The beautiful thing is Kevin stays and talks with my Dad for
another half hour and when Darren shows up he hangs out with "my group" for
quite a while before going to join Ted.  My parents and I ate our steaks
right behind Ted and then went back over to our group at the picnic table
when we were finished.  It really was a great night.  I would almost say I
was glowing (I was having so much fun with my friends and family and it
wasn't a show for Ted's benefit...I really was having a great time).  So,
when my parents decide to head out they walked over to Ted/Kevin's table to
say good-bye to Kevin.  It was awesome.  Ted's sitting right next to Kevin
while Kevin and my Dad are talking and appears to be actually shrinking in
his chair.  Yet again no acknowledgement of my parents - he couldn't even
make eye-contact.  I ended up staying there for at least another hour and
then went with a few of the guys to the Ale House.  Needless to say I was
very hung over today.  Anyway, there's the story...He's a complete and utter
ass-hole.  So I'm done.  And no, there is no way he could weasel his way back
in to my good graces.

Now on to a fun subject, my trip to London.  I bought my ticket today ( I
think I got hosed a little bit, but it was the cheapest ticket I could find -
$450 before taxes).  I will arrive at Heathrow airport around 7:00 a.m.
Friday the 6th and depart about 11:00 a.m. on Tuesday the 10th.  I'm very
excited about the trip, I really need to get out of Houston.  I leave the
activities in your capable hands.  ( bear in mind I will have to see Darren
and Nick at some point).

"Single again" Sue


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000 10:39 AM -----

	Edward D Baughman
	09/19/2000 10:14 AM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Most Active Counterparties

Elizabeth:

The attached list is a follow up to our discussion (i.e., IPALCO's problem
contract) on existing customer contracts and mid-market's initiative to
dramatically ramp up short term deal flow. This list represents
counter-parties we anticipate transacting with frequently. Please advise as
to problem areas.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000
09:59 AM ---------------------------

Karla Compean
09/19/2000 09:41 AM
To: Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Most Active Counterparties


Please ensure the following is done each day:

1.  All East calcs are calc'd Official Ad-Hoc Desk and then Officialized

2.  Nymex calc of three remaining gas books is calc'd and Officialized

3.  East Bankruptcy calc is calc'd Official Ad-Hoc Full Book but NOT Officialized

4.  Send an e-mail with the bankruptcy calc post id to:  Debbie Brackett, Stephanie McGinnis and John Powell

Thanks!
Casey


---------------------- Forwarded by Gordon McKillop/NA/Enron on 09/26/2000
03:12 PM ---------------------------

Nancy Muchmore
09/26/2000 11:27 AM
To: Gordon McKillop/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Frank Stabler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Randy
Young/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: URGENT -- Re: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

Gordon:

Randy Young asked me to send you the following information concerning the
entity to be inserted directly under Ponderosa Assets L.P.   The entity will
be a Cayman Islands company, Enron International Brazil 2000 Ltd., with
50,000 shares authorized and 1,000 shares issued to Ponderosa Assets L.P.

Please call me at ext. 66197 should you have any questions or need further
information regarding this company.

Nancy

Randy Young
09/26/2000 10:42 AM
To: Nancy Muchmore/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank
Stabler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: URGENT -- Re: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

fyi.
---------------------- Forwarded by Randy Young/NA/Enron on 09/26/2000 11:31
AM ---------------------------

Scott Sefton@ECT
09/26/2000 10:37 AM
To: Randy Young/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Gordon McKillop/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: URGENT -- Re: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

Randy,

Hedges in the Raptor structure require that a Proposal Sheet be submitted to
the counterparty to the swap (the counterparty is owned by an outside
investor and our agreement with them requires this). Attached to Mary's email
below is the Raptor Derivative Proposal Sheet that the business unit will
need to submit. Gordon is responsible for this process and can answer any
questions you have.

Also attached below is a Raptor Securities/Confidentiality Response Form that
ENA legal prepared to help them conduct a due diligence exercise on their
merchant assets being hedged to confirm that there were no contractual or
other legal restrictions that may affect their ability to enter into the
swap. Although  many of the items on this form won't be relevant to what
you're hedging, I thought it may be helpful. Because we're not familiar with
the assets or any South American legal issues that may apply, we'll be
looking to you for confirmation that there aren't any issues in this regard.

You can ignore the document entitled Raptor Process for Inclusion of Swaps
into Raptor Vehicles.

Please call me or Gordon if you have any questions. Thanks!

Scott
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000 08:19
AM ---------------------------

MARY COOK
09/25/2000 06:38 PM
To: Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron, Hope
Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia H Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

We can discuss tomorrow, but the swap group is not staffed either to fulfill
the coordination of all the work in respect of the underlying assets.  Do you
have alternative ideas?

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com

	Scott Sefton
	09/25/2000 06:34 PM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia H
Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

Although I'm happy to discuss this at our meeting tomorrow, I don't think the
draft process document describes a role for Global Finance legal that we can
properly fulfill.

MARY COOK
09/25/2000 02:14 PM
To: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Julia H Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hope
Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

See attached for your review prior to meeting, Tuesday 9:30 38C1.  Thanks.
Mary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


On Friday night we discovered that the planned maintenance at Palo Verde for
Sunday was  a "go" again.     The cash traders/preschedulers had been told
that the work was cancelled.

R. Slinger and Leaf rerouted 150mw's of onpeak energy  that was routed/tagged
to go to the PX,   saving the company $48,096.   The PX cleared for zero's
much of the onpeak hours, as there was major cong. at PV.    They sold to LA
directly 100 mw's and also booked out 50mw's with the generator (TEP) of one
of the preschedules.    Our desk retained the majority of the savings, as
indicated below.

This was a good exercise,   as it demonstrates how we can "jump chain" on
certain curtailed paths and settle directly with the generator's to avoid
inadvertancy.
This was done and the system balanced perfectly.

Good job!!

JMF

---------------------- Forwarded by John M Forney/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 02:21
PM ---------------------------
From: John M Forney on 10/23/2000 08:37 AM
To: Mark Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Sunday Palo Verde Preschedules

Mark,
As discussed,   we've rerouted your onpeak Palo Verde (150 mw's) schedules
that were destined to go to the P/X,    We sold 100 mw's to LADWP for $38 -
see deal #440641.   We also booked out 50mw's at $50 with TEP - see deal
#440642.
For ease of accounting,  these sales were entered under your book,  ST SW,
so you are flat for this day.

The P/X onpeak average was, as I calculated,  $21.96.
The wt. avg price of the bookout/ sales agreements was $42.   The net,  of
course,  is $20.04.

Enron saved:

$20.04 * 150mw's  * 16 hrs =  $48,096

Our split was 70%,  so we should enter an annuity for this amount,
$33,667.20.

If you agree,  let me know and I will enter the deal.

Thanks for the "heads up."  This was a good call for the company.

JMF


I need the following 3 files 1st thing:

Wabash Valley Power Association, Inc.
Ontario Power Generation
Royal Bank of Canada/Enron Canada Corp.

Thanks!


Duke Energy, Environmentalists Strike Deal over California Plant
Tom Knudson

May. 16, 2001
Knight Ridder Tribune Business News - KRTBN
Copyright (C) 2001 KRTBN Knight Ridder Tribune Business News; Source: World
Reporter (TM)

Days after state regulators gave Duke Energy the go-ahead to expand its Moss
Landing Power Plant near Monterey Bay last fall, documents show four
environmental groups made their own deal with the utility giant. The four
signed an agreement not to "participate in any lawsuit (or) regulatory
challenge" that might slow or stop the project in exchange for a financial
concession: $1 million from Duke for environmental "monitoring and research."

Balancing power generation and environmental protection always has been
difficult. But today, as power-starved California scrambles to find and
permit new energy sources, some fear the Moss Landing agreement shows that
money can sway even environmentalists -- and tip the scales too far in favor
of economic development.

Environmentalists who signed the agreement, though, said that despite their
concerns about the plant expansion, they had little chance of stopping it,
especially after it was approved by the California Energy Commission and
Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board.

So they took the potentially controversial step: entering into an agreement
with Duke for financial resources to pay for studies of the plant's impact on
the marine environment.

Other environmentalists, though, criticized that approach.

Duke Energy's efforts to modernize the Moss Landing Power Plant resulted in
mitigation payments to environmental and other groups, including:

$7 million to the Elkhorn Slough Foundation to mitigate the plant's use of
seawater.

$425,000 to the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Foundation over three years to monitor
heated seawater discharge in the ocean.

$1 million to the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Foundation over five years to
monitor water quality through a program sponsored by Save Our Shores, the
Center for Marine Conservation, the Friends of the Sea Otter and the Otter
Project.

$100,000 to the Marine Mammal Center to relocate its triage center for
injured animals onto power plant property.

$3.4 million to the Moss Landing Chamber of Commerce over 20 years for
infrastructure improvements in the Moss Landing community.

$100,000 to design and construct a boardwalk for additional beach access in
Moss Landing.

$60,000 for an environmental assessment for a proposed Elkhorn Slough Circle
Trail. If approved, Duke would provide an additional $250,000 endowment to
maintain the trail.

"It is very disheartening," said Carolyn Nielson, a retired teacher who along
with some other local residents is waging a battle against what they consider
an environmentally harmful power plant cooling system.

"These environmental groups have the expertise, the biologists, the
attorneys," said Nielson, who has taken her case to the State Water Resources
Control Board. "We could have been much more successful with their help. But
there wouldn't have been any financial reward in it for them."

Such criticisms are off-base, according to Warner Chabot, regional director
for the Center for Marine Conservation, a national environmental group that
was among those to sign the deal. He said environmentalists got the best deal
possible in the current energy climate.

"Look at what's happening with power plant approvals in California right
now," said Chabot, referring to the state's push to bring new energy sources
on line.

The Moss Landing project -- which is scheduled to add 1,060 megawatts in
2002, enough to serve one million homes -- is a key part of that energy
expansion plan.

No money will go to the four environmental groups -- the Center for Marine
Conservation, along with Save Our Shores, Friends of the Sea Otter and the
Otter Project. It will be routed, in five yearly installments of $200,000
each, to the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Foundation, a nonprofit organization that
helps support sanctuary programs, including scientific research.

Chabot helped found the sanctuary foundation and sits on its board. He said
the money will be used to monitor the health of Elkhorn Slough, a
biologically rich estuary that borders the plant and is linked to Monterey
Bay.

"Not a dime comes to the Center for Marine Conservation," he said. "Not a
penny comes to me."

Duke representatives said the controversy about the arrangement has been
stirred by a handful of people.

"It's a million dollars worth of water quality studies," said Duke spokesman
Tom Williams. "Our whole effort wasn't to try to buy anybody off. It was
designed to help increase people's comfort level where there wasn't a comfort
level."

The $1 million agreement signed in November is part of a package of more than
$12 million in Duke payments to civil, government and environmental groups in
connection with the plant modernization.

The heftiest award -- $7 million to the Elkhorn Slough Foundation, a
nonprofit environmental organization -- was negotiated by state agencies to
"mitigate" environmental impacts of the plant.

Formed in 1982, the slough foundation exists to promote "the wise use and
conservation of Elkhorn Slough and surrounding wetlands," its Web site says.
However, some environmentalists say the state-approved mitigation plan is
inadequate.

"If you want to say, 'Who did Duke roll with a big chunk of money?' I would
say they rolled the California Energy Commission and the Regional Water Board
for the price of mitigation," Chabot said. "The agencies got bought off
cheap. And the environment got taken to the cleaners."

Duke's Williams strongly disagreed. Environmental mitigation "must be based
on science, not on buying anybody off," he said. "That is inappropriate, and
we would not participate in that.

"That suggestion is offensive to us. And it should be offensive to any
environmentalist."

Bob Haussler, head of the Energy Commission's environmental protection
office, said the mitigation plan is biologically sound. "We are confident it
will improve the slough ecosystem," he said.

Madeline Clark, a local businesswoman and founder of Monterey Parkway -- a
citizens group that scrutinizes local public works projects -- called the
recipients of Duke's payments a "shopping list" of government agencies,
environmental groups and civic organizations. She was particularly critical
of the $1 million deal with environmental groups.

"You know what bothers me?" Clark said. "Environmental groups get tons of
donations. Their purpose is to protect and defend the environment. If a big
corporation like Duke can come in and buy them off, I have a real problem
with that."

Construction began in November on Duke's project to add 1,060 megawatts of
natural gas-fired electrical capacity to the Moss Landing plant, purchased
from PG&E in 1998.

If the expansion is finished next year, as scheduled, it would account for
more than 30 percent of all new generation in California in 2002.

"This is a big deal," said Williams, the Duke spokesman. "It will be the
largest plant in California. If that plant is delayed a month or two, we lose
the summer of 2002. And that affects not only Duke Energy, but the state of
California."

Opponents say it's not the power they oppose, but the plant's cooling system,
which will pump about 1.2 billion gallons of seawater each day from Moss
Landing Harbor. Such pumping, they say, will degrade Elkhorn Slough. They
argue for an alternative cooling system, such as towers that re-circulate
water.

"Basically, what that plant will do is take 25 percent of the volume of the
harbor and slough, run it through a pipe and dump it back into the ocean with
much of the marine life cooked and dead," said Steve Shimek, executive
director of the Otter Project.

For Shimek and other environmentalists, scientific studies commissioned by
Duke during the permitting process left key questions unanswered about the
plant's impact on the environment.

"There was no scientific evidence that would literally point to Duke causing
harm to the environment," said Vicki Nichols, executive director of Save Our
Shores. "We felt we didn't have strong standing to sue."

Instead, the environmentalists began negotiating with Duke for financial
payments for studies of environmental impacts of the modernization project.

The process "gave me tremendous pause and great concern," Nichols said. "I
knew there was going to be some perception that we were doing the wrong
thing."

She was right.

"As far as I'm concerned, with the price-gouging going on by the energy
wholesalers, they are just receiving stolen goods," said Clark, of the
citizens group.

Her skepticism was sharpened by the recent disclosure that Duke Energy
approached Gov. Gray Davis with a secret deal offering financial concessions
if the state dropped lawsuits and investigations into the power generator.

Chabot, with the Center for Marine Conservation, discouraged any comparison
between the two offers, calling it "grossly unfair and inaccurate."

Regardless of what was intended with the payments, Nielson said they stain
the process. "It is so destructive in terms of making everyone cynical," she
said.

Shimek took a different view. "We convinced Duke to spend $1 million toward
monitoring that, frankly, five years from now could very well come back to
haunt them," he said.

"Did we do the right thing? I have no idea. Did we try our best? Yes, we
did."


Feels funny emailing someone so close.  I'm addicted to email, however,

I saw Gregg in the elevator lobby as the door was closing.  I'm going to see
if I can corner him while he is in town to see what is going on.  I'm not
up-to-speed on this one.

Kay

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 08/30/2000 08:14 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Midwest Energy Hub LLC ("Midwest")

I'm free after 11 am - Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/30/2000 08:13 AM -----

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/29/2000 07:09 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Midwest Energy Hub LLC ("Midwest")

Sara,

Maybe a conference call with Gregg would be the most productive way to go.

Kay

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 08/23/2000 05:19 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Midwest Energy Hub LLC ("Midwest")

Kay:  I left you a voice mail yesterday at Sheila's suggestion regarding
Midwest.  Greg and I discussed the use of ENA's format of ISDA documentation
by Midwest and I have a couple of questions about how our docs will be used,
whether Midwest will be competing with us and who will be negotiating hedge
agreements on behalf of Midwest (i.e., will ENA swap lawyers be involved?).
Please call me so that I can comply with Greg's request..
Thanks.  Sara

Greg:  I will have the boilerplate sent to you separately.


Yes, please ticket.


Here is a chart cross-referencing Gas Daily price points with points of TW,
for purposes of imbalance valuation.  If you have questions call Jeff or me.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 08/11/2000
10:01 AM ---------------------------

Jeffery Fawcett
08/11/2000 09:59 AM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: New TW price points

Susan,
As requested in yesterday's meeting, Lindy and I came up with the attached
matrix of prices for purposes of valuing TW imbalances.  Let me know if you
have any questions.