Subject: Energy Market Report - 01/30/02

Energy Market Report
Wednesday, January 30, 2002

*See attached pdf file.
__________________________________________________________
Western Pre-Scheduled Firm Electricity Prices($/MWh)
January 30, 2002 for January 31, 2002

Peak(Heavy)
                   Low      Change     High     Change
NW/N. Rockies     18.90      0.00     20.50      1.00
Mid-Columbia      18.90      0.00     20.50      1.00
COB               21.25      0.25     22.95      0.95
N. California     23.50      0.00     25.25      1.00
Midway/Sylmar       NA        NA        NA        NA
S. California     23.75      0.75     25.50      0.50
Mead              25.00      0.50     26.25     -0.25
Palo Verde        23.00     -0.50     26.00      0.50
Inland SW         23.00     -0.50     26.25     -0.25
4-Corners         23.75      0.75     26.75      1.50
Central Rockies   20.75      0.25     23.50      0.50
__________________________________________________________
Off-Peak(Light)
                   Low      Change     High     Change
NW/N. Rockies     17.75      0.75     18.75     -0.25
Mid-Columbia      17.75      0.75     18.75     -0.25
COB               18.00      0.25     19.50      0.75
N. California     19.00      0.75     21.00      1.25
Midway/Sylmar       NA        NA        NA        NA
S. California     18.50      0.75     21.00      0.50
Mead              18.25      1.25     21.00      2.00
Palo Verde        14.75      0.00     17.00      0.50
Inland SW         14.75      0.00     21.00      2.00
4-Corners         15.00      0.00     17.00      1.00
Central Rockies   13.00      1.00     14.50      0.75
_________________________________________________________
Going Short for the Shortest Month

Day-ahead electricity prices in the Western U.S. were mostly higher
Wednesday on continued cold weather.  Some traders also said that rising
spot gas prices lent support to the daily power market.  "The worst of this
cold snap appears to be over, but the market will likely take a day or so to
react," believed one marketer.  According to Weather Derivatives, heating
demand throughout the West was forecast to fall to below-normal levels over
the coming weekend, and the latest six-to-ten from the NWS was calling for
mostly normal temperatures from February 5 through 9.  February contracts
were trading a buck or two below the dailies at all of the major Western
hubs on Wednesday.  "Historically, February has been a lighter load month
than January, and that's why we're heading into the new month with a short
position," said one matter-of-fact trader.  In other industry news,
Wednesday's AGA inventory report showed that U.S. gas stocks fell 111 bcf
last week, right in line with most industry estimates.  Total U.S.
inventories of 2.294 tcf were still 1.053 tcf, or 85 percent, above last
year.  Of the 111 bcf taken out of storage last week, 19 were drawn in the
Western Consuming region.  Total inventories in the West stood at 360 bcf,
or 71 percent of full.  Western stocks were at 222 bcf the same week a year
ago, and have averaged 265 bcf over the past five years.

Peak power prices in the Northwest rose marginally for Thursday delivery,
despite a general sense that the worst of the cold snap was over.  "We were
a little surprised to see prices rise today because it is supposed to begin
warming up, and we are fairly bearish heading into February," said one
Washington-based trader.  Heating demand in the region was forecast to
steadily drop from 119 percent of normal on Thursday, to 99 percent of
normal on February 6.  Flow forecasts for Chief Joseph were revised upward
again on Wednesday, coming in at 115 kcfs Thursday, 110 kcfs Friday, 80 kcfs
Saturday, 65 kcfs Sunday, 110 kcfs Monday and Tuesday, and 105 kcfs next
Wednesday.  In unit news, Bridger #4 (520 MW) was shut Wednesday morning due
to a plugged boiler.  While no ETR was given for the Wyoming-based unit,
sources familiar with thermal plants said such a problem is usually fixed in
48 hours or less.  While Colstrip #3 (700 MW) remained down with no official
ETR, some parties believed it would not return until February 9.

Amid continued below-normal forecasts for Thursday and stronger natural gas
values at the SoCal border, day-ahead electricity prices for delivery on the
last day of January gained ground in the Golden State.  Traders noted that
spot gas and light load prices were particularly strong.  "I was surprised
that gas was strong today.  The forecasts are warming gradually though, so
gas should start to ease soon and electricity prices should fall off," said
one California trader.  Prices at COB settled higher on Wednesday, with
heavy load deals heard between 21.25 and 22.95$/MWh and light load changing
hands from 18 to 19.5.  "We saw an opportunity to make some money at COB
today," said one Western dealer.  February COB lingered about 2$/MWh cheaper
than the dailies, with peak products heard trading near 20$/MWh and off-peak
pieces reportedly going through from 16.75 to 16.95$/MWh.  Similarly,
front-month deals at NP15 were heard about a dollar cheaper than the
dailies, near 22.75$/MWh for heavy load goods.  CAISO reported little change
in the overall generation landscape on Wednesday, with a difference of less
than 100 MW off-line to a day ago.  Of note, San Luis (326 MW) exited the
grid for planned maintenance.  Thursday temperatures were expected to reach
highs in the low-60s at southern load centers, and about 50 degrees at
mid-state.  The five-day forecast called for gradual warming, with
temperatures still expected to be about four degrees below normal on Sunday.
The most current six-to-ten predicted normal temperatures from February 5 to
9.

While peak power prices in the Southwest dipped by 50 cents on both the high
and low ends, the bulk of deals were done at slightly higher levels than on
the previous day.  Continued cold weather and rising spot gas values were
the main factors lending support to the dailies on Wednesday.  Starting on
Friday, heating demand in the desert region was forecast to drop sharply,
dipping to below-normal levels by February 3.  Peak electricity prices at
Palo Verde ranged from 23$/MWh early, to a late-session high of 26$/MWh,
while February contracts were heard around the 21.65$/MWh mark.  Light load
goods for Thursday delivery traded from 14.75 to 17$/MWh, while February off
peak was seeing action near the 14.7$/MWh level.  There were no new outages
of consequence to report in the Southwest on Wednesday, but looking further
ahead, Palo Verde #2 (1,270 MW) was scheduled to shut for spring maintenance
from March 16 through April 20.  Weather forecasts called for gradual
warming over the coming weekend, and the latest six-to-ten from the NWS was
predicting normal temperatures from February 5 through 9.

Patrick O'Neill and Jessie Norris
_________________________________________________________

Western Generating Unit Outages

Current                            Begins          Ends          Reason
CAISO units <250/6390 total          NA             NA
planned/unplanned*
Alamitos #3/320/gas               26-Jan-02         ?            planned
Alamitos #6/480/gas               20-Jan-02         ?            planned
Big Creek Project/1020/hydro      28-Jan-02         ?        @710MW, planned
Bridger #4/520/coal               30-Jan-02     1-Feb-02         repairs*
Colstrip #3/700/coal              11-Jan-02         ?            repairs
Corondado #1/395/coal             25-Jan-02     29-Jan-02        tube leak
Encina #4/303/gas                 12-Jan-02         ?            unplanned
Etiwanda #4/320/gas               21-Jan-02         ?            planned
Four Corners #5                   09-Jan-02     14-Mar-02        maintenance
Grand Coulee #19/600/hydro        10-Dec-01       March          repairs
Haynes #6/341/gas                 07-Jan-02         ?            planned
Helms PGP #2/407/hydro            01-Oct-01         ?            planned
Hyatt/Thermalito/933/hydro        02-Oct-01         ?      @665 MW,
unplanned
Moss Landing #7/739/gas           29-Dec-01         ?            planned
Ormond Beach #1/725/gas           28-Dec-01         ?            planned
Ormond Beach #2/750/gas           05-Oct-01         ?      @350 MW,
unplanned
Pittsburg #6/317/gas              22-Nov-01         ?            planned
San Luis PGP/326/hydro            30-Jan-02         ?            planned*
Scattergood #3/445/gas            22-Jan-02         ?            maintenance

Future
Navajo #2/750/coal                02-Feb-02     25-Feb-02        maintenance
Palo Verde #2/1270/nuclear        16-Mar-02     20-Apr-02
maintenance*

For unit owners refer to pdf version.
*Indicates a change from previous EMR.
______________________________________________________________________

Eastern Markets Pre-Scheduled Firm Power Prices ($/MWh)

January 30, 2002 for January 31, 2002

Peak (Heavy) in $/MWh
                 Low     Change   High      Change
Into Cinergy    16.00    -1.00    18.50     -0.80
Western PJM     21.20     0.20    22.20      0.70
Into Entergy    16.00     1.00    17.50      0.35
Into TVA        16.00     0.25    18.00      1.25
ERCOT           18.50     1.00    19.25     -0.15
___________________________________________________________
Amid expectations of continued warm weather through Friday and a natural gas
storage report within industry estimates, spot electricity prices were
mostly steady across the Eastern Interconnect on Wednesday.  Saturday
predictions called for below-normal temperatures, a break in the bearish
weather pattern that has been depressing demand and prices for much of
January.  The AGA weekly natural gas storage report listed a draw of 111
bcf.  NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas futures were mixed, with March picking up
1.3 cents to close at 2.08$/mmBtu, while April slipped 0.3 cent to end the
day at 2.147$/mmBtu.

While revised loads and forecasts met with skepticism from traders in the
Mid-Atlantic on Wednesday, day-ahead electricity prices climbed slightly
higher.  "Loads and temperatures were revised upwards today.  There's
supposed to be some colder weather for the weekend, but bullish forecasts
have been pushed back all month, so we'll see if the cold actually
materializes this time," commented one PJM player with a wait-and-see
attitude.  Western PJM goods for Thursday delivery changed hands between
21.2 and 22.2$/MWh, with the bulk of deals done around 21.6$/MWh.  LMPs
gradually increased from 09:00 through 11:30 EST reaching a high of 44$/MWh,
but averaged only 20.17$/MWh through 15:00 EST.  In unit news, sources said
Keystone #2 (850 MW) returned to the grid on Wednesday, back from a two-day
maintenance outage.  High temperatures were expected in the upper-40s to
low-50s on Thursday, with overnight lows in the 35 to 42-degree range.  The
latest six-to-ten called for above-normal temperatures from February 5 to 9.

Peak power prices settled lower in the Midwest on Thursday, as continued
bearish fundamentals took their toll on the ECAR market.  Into Cinergy
pieces were bought and sold between 16 and 18.5$/MWh, with the low end
reached in late trade.  No new outages were reported on Thursday, although
traders continued to speculate that many marginal units were off-line for
load following.  Temperatures were predicted to be slightly warmer on
Thursday.  However, the mercury was expected to drop about 15 degrees on
Friday.  The most current six-to-ten predicted above-normal temperatures
from February 5 to 9.

With stronger than expected natural gas values, heavy load energy costs
edged higher in the Southeast on Thursday.  "Prices were bouncing around
quite a bit today.  It was hard to figure out where things were," commented
one Entergy dealer.  Other sources said spring maintenance would start to
affect the market soon, as operators push repairs forward in light of low
prices and warm weather.  Into Entergy trades were heard between 16 and
17.5$/MWh, mostly in the 16s, while February changed hands from 18.35 to
18.5$/MWh.  Texas power remained steady, firming up a buck on the low end.
The bulk of Into TVA deals were done with a 17 handle, but early trades were
heard as low as 16$/MWh.  The updated six-to-ten called for mostly normal
conditions in SERC and Texas from February 5 to 9.
___________________________________________________________

California ISO Congestion Index in $/MWh

                         Path                 Peak   Off-peak
for 31-Jan-02         NW1 to NP15             0.00     0.00
                      NW3 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      AZ3 to SP15             0.00    25.24
                      LC1 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      SP15 to NP15            0.00     0.00

OTC Forward Peak Electricity Contracts in $/MWh

                    Mid-C              PV              SP-15
                Bid      Ask      Bid      Ask      Bid      Ask
BOM              NA       NA       NA       NA       NA       NA
February       16.75    18.25    21.50    22.50    22.50    23.50
March          15.00    16.50    20.50    21.50    21.50    22.50
April          15.25    16.75    21.75    22.75      NA       NA
Q2 '02         15.50    17.00    24.00    25.00    23.50    24.50
Q3 '02         28.50    30.00    37.00    38.00    36.25    37.25
Q4 '02         27.00    28.50    27.00    28.00    28.50    29.50
Q1 '03         27.00    28.50      NA       NA     29.50    30.50
Cal '03        28.50    30.00    32.50    33.50    34.25    35.25

Represents the most recent bid/ask spread obtainable
by the Energy Market Report.

Alberta Power Pool Index (C$/MWh)

                    Peak(14)   Peak(16)   Off-Peak    Flat     Change
for  29-Jan-02       56.99      53.91      17.53      42.69    12.89

BPA's Offer for 02/01/02 and 02/02/02.

Hours        Amount          NW delivered        COB/NOB delivered
7-22         200MW           Market Price*          Market Price*

*Market price will be determined at time of request.

NYMEX Henry Hub Gas Futures in $/mmBtu

                 Close        Change
        Mar      2.080         0.013
        Apr      2.147        -0.003

Natural Gas Spot Prices in $/mmBtu

                  Low          High
Sumas             2.03         2.08
So. Cal Border    2.14         2.19
San Juan          1.99         2.04
__________________________________________________________

Economic Insight, Inc. - 3004 SW First, Portland, Oregon 97201,
Telephone (503) 222-2425, Internet e-mail emr@econ.com -
Copyright, Economic Insight, Inc. 2002.


Sorry about the Greek in the first paragraph of my last E-mail.  I still
can't figure out how I did that.  All I said was, as you know, CMUA filed a
complaint with FERC asking for cost-based rates and introducing an outline of
an answer to the legal issues.

Under the FERC rules, we are required to file an answer to the complaint.  I
have also asked Seabron for an estimate for answering the economics
assertions raised in CMUA and PG&E's filings.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 11:18 AM
---------------------------

Mary Hain
10/18/2000 10:37 AM
To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, steve.c.hall@enron.com, Richard Sanders,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona Petrochko, jdasovic@ees.enron.com, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christi Nicolay, carrrn@bracepatt.com
Subject: Proposed Answer of CMUA's Complaint

As you have already heard, California Municipal Utilities Association filed a
complaint with FERC asking for cost based rates. The following is a brief
outline of an EPMI/EES answer to the complaint.  The answer is due Friday.
Please send me any comments ASAP.

? The complaint should be rejected because it wrongly assumes that the
Commission has no option to ensure just and reasonable rates but to require
cost based rates because there is no low cost solution to the problems
currently faced by the California markets.  We should attach our white paper
to our protest and state that the paper explains how these problems could be
solved at little or no cost to the customers.
? I list here, for your information, the reasons CMUA claims that markets are
not competitive (these reasons will not be re-listed in the pleading).
? 2000 prices greatly exceeded 1999 prices without regard to load.
? zonal constrained prices, even in the off-peak hours, do not reflect
competitive outcomes for low load conditions.
? even small players can be price setters
? The changes required are additional generation, transmission, and demand
response and will cost tens of millions of dollars and take lengthy periods
of time to implement.
? There is no evidence that markets will ensure just and reasonable rates in
the near future.
? CMUA asserts that with the advent of electric restructuring, the Commission
has increasingly allowed energy and ancillary services to be sold at
market-based rates.  However, CMUA is wrong in the context of the West where
there has been market-based trading of electricity before electric
restructuring, since the FERC approved the Western Systems Power Pool,s
contract in 1991.  The Commission,s rules didn,t create the wholesale market
in the past, the market did and it was running fine until it was messed up by
certain market rules were imposed that are enumerated in our paper.  The
problem is not the market-based rates.  The problem is the market rules.
? CMUA,s motion does not address how market-based rates would be calculated
for marketers that do not sell power from their own resources, let alone
reflect the trading of basis points.  Almost all of the power EPMI sells is
power it has bought from some other marketer or generator.  Many of EPMI,s
deals are done through brokers such that EPMI does not find out the identity
of the seller until after a deal has been struck.  Accordingly, EPMI gets no
information about the cost of the underlying generation.
? If FERC doesn,t try to fix the market but simply takes away our
market-based rates, since there,s is no basis for us to set cost based rates,
we would go out of business.  Besides there,s no reason to take away our
market-based rates because we are not exercising market power.  So if FERC
could fix the problem with a less onerous solution (as we,ve proposed in our
white paper), requiring cost-based rates would constitute a regulatory taking
of our business and we would have to be compensated using the constitutional
standard.
 CMUA does not provide any expert testimony to support its position.  Rather,
its evidence is &drawn from materials prepared and testimony delivered by the
California ISO and other public sources.8  Beyond the difficult evidentiary
issue posed by the fact that CMUA cannot swear to the veracity of information
produced by third parties, EPMI would have no opportunity to conduct
discovery or cross-examine of such &witnesses.8


Yes (sort of).  I'm in Houston.  Up on 47.  What's up?


i'm broke ...after the summer's spending excesses!!!

j

From: Tana Jones on 13/10/2000 08:33 CDT
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

Why aren't you playing polo?  Has your horse accepted other film roles after
your smashing success in Gladiator?

P.S.  Missed you at the seminar, it's just not the same when you're not
there...!

	Justin Boyd
	10/13/2000 12:52 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

tana - fine with me!

tootoo

..how's it all going?

i'm not playing polo this winter - boohoo!...feeling very deprived!

j

From: Tana Jones on 12/10/2000 13:10 CDT
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

Justy,

I don't think there is any problem with this.  But since Harry told me to run
it by you, I am.  Could you sign off ASAP.  Thanks!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 01:09 PM -----

	Harry M Collins
	10/12/2000 12:29 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

I do not know of any reason that they should not be able to transact UK oil
and products. However, it would be best to also check with London on this
request.

	Tana Jones
	10/12/2000 11:55 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

I don't see any problem with this request, do you?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 11:55 AM -----

	Stephanie Sever
	10/12/2000 11:31 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

Please let me know if this request is OK?

Thanks,
Stephanie
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
11:27 AM ---------------------------

Brant Reves
10/12/2000 11:19 AM
To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

We are ok with this request for Utilicorp United, Inc.

brant

From:  Stephanie Sever
     10/12/2000 10:52 AM

To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK crude
and oil products

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
10:48 AM ---------------------------

From:  Mary Griff Gray
     10/12/2000 10:20 AM

To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK crude
and oil products

Tom -

What do you think?

Thanks,
Griff
x35753


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042412.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred: 133.85 / Final: 133.30)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Enron Principal Investments (EPI), which was formed in the 2nd quarter, has completed its integration and the development of its new strategy.  This group will be responsible for identifying, closing, managing and exiting all non-E&P equity investments for Enron worldwide.  Kevin Garland will lead EPI, which includes Barbara Paige, Andrew Marsden, Kevin Kuykendall, Steven Sheldon, Michele Nezi Marvin and Mark Gandy.  Additionally, Dick Lydecker and the Special Asset Group will continue to report to Kevin.

EPI will pursue investments related to Enron's core businesses, where Enron has a unique insight into the market, company or technology.  Initially, this will be geographically focused in North America and Europe.  This group will rely heavily on the support and cooperation of the core business units to provide information and market insight.

EPI may make investments in the form of venture capital, leverage buyouts, growth equity, or private equity in public companies.  The group will not make investments in seed stage companies, other funds, subsidiaries of larger corporations, or project equity.

Please join me in supporting the efforts of Enron Principal Investments.


Valero has accepted this proposal.  Please set up appropriate deal tickets
and Dan Hyvl is preparing a new contract.

---------------------- Forwarded by Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
01:23 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary W Lamphier                           01/07/2000 10:53 AM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Issues

---------------------- Forwarded by Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
10:52 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary W Lamphier                           01/07/2000 09:38 AM

To: brotherss@valero.com
cc:
Subject: Issues

Susan,

Hope you had a great new year and holiday season!  I have a couple of issues
I want ot clear up for this year's contract.

The question is how valero wants to treat the three meter locations where you
are currently pulling gas.  Our new contract that was just sent to you has a
minimum take of 60,000 mmbtu (estimated 35,000 @ 8018 Celanese, 15,000 @ 1233
Texas City, and 10,000 @ 1394 Dodge Street).  If you undertake at any meter
excess volumes from another meter would be used to fulfill the entire 60,000
mmbtu.  My accountant has told me that this is causing difficulties with the
two plants and how they want to see gas purchases broken out.  We discussed
this on the phone and I got your consent to split these invoices.  Now we are
being told all three invoices need to be separate.  Since we always aim to
please the customer, here is my recommendation for handling the contract
through it's term.  Please let me know if this is fine.

Celanese 35,000 mmbtu/d minimum  On any given day if volumes fall below
35,000 HPLC will buy back these volumes at GD Katy mid
      two days after flow

Texas City 15,000 mmbtu/d minimum On any given day if volumes fall below
15,000 HPLC will buy back these volumes at GD Katy mid
      two days after flow

Dodge Street 10,000 mmbtu/d minimum On any given day if volumes fall below
10,000 HPLC will buy back these volumes at GD Katy mid
      two days after flow

Any excess volumes taken at all three locations would be billed @ GD HSC High
2 day after


First off I hope your still not at work when I send this.

Secondly it would be cool to meet earlier in the week but I'm in San Antonio
and will be until Friday.  I will be driving to Houston on Friday morning to
do some packing and then the parents will be coming up on Saturday morning
to help with the final move.  I will pretty much leave it in your ball park
about Friday night.  I know you have been working long hours and Friday is
just a bad day.  Even though I would like to see you, if you have a repeat
of last week then I understand if you want to call it off.  In that case
maybe we can meet up some other time.  Although I do remember a girl telling
me once that weekends are her time and she was going to go out no matter
what.

Let me know what you think and I'll probably give you a call Friday
afternoon to see how things are going.

Kyle

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Thanks.  I like this format...please keep me updated.   Jeff

Robert Johnston
10/26/2000 05:16 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: US Election

We are tracking the poll numbers and trends heading into the election.  Still
too close to call, but momentum may be swinging back to Gore.

The major tracking polls: Bush Leading in 4, Gore in 1.

       ABC    CNN    MSNBC  Voter  W.Post
Bush   48     49     43     44     47
Gore   46     42     45     40     45

Note that Bush is leading in West Virginia and Louisiana, what should be Gore
states, but Gore is leading in Florida and Ohio, two "must-win" Bush states.
Gore is trending favorably in large vote-rich states including not only
Florida and Ohio, but also New Jersey and Pennsylvania as well as traditional
Democratic strongholds such as Minnesota and Wisconsin.  One caveat is that
today's NYT Florida poll is the flip of yesterday's Florida Sun Sentinel
Florida poll that showed Bush leading (46-41).  Bush has changed his schedule
and is on his way to Ohio tonight.

Latest State Polls: "Bad News" for  Both

??? ???   AZ  CO  FL* LA* MI  NJ

Bush     49  44  42  45  42  41
Gore     39  40  46  34  44  47
Nader     3   3   3   4   3   4
Buchanan  0   1   1   3  --   1

          OH* OK  PA  WA  WV*  WI

Bush      43  51  33  37  46  39
Gore      45  40  44  46  36  46
Nader      1  --   1   3  --   5
Buchanan  --   2   0  --  --  --


You are invited to theupcoming HYLA events:

Thursday, November 15th:        An Evening with the Judiciary

Quite possibly the best HYLA event of the year!
HYLA invites all of the state & federal local judiciary to an evening at Brennans. Come mix and mingle with the judiciary and other HYLA members while enjoying delicious Brennanfood!
Brennans
     3300 Smith Street
 6-8p.m.
    Free for HYLA members and $20 for non-members

Thursday, Nov. 29:                              "The State Court Basics"

A great CLE opportunity for HYLA members!
November 29th, 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
129th District Court; 1019 Congress, 16th Floor
$30 for HYLA members and $40 non-members.
CLE Credit:  2.5 hours of CLE credit has been requested  (.5 is ethics).
Featuring several judges including Hon. Pat Mizell, Hon. Levi Benton, Hon. Jane Bland, and Hon. Tracy Christopher
Topics (include): The "Inner Workings" of the District Clerk's Office; Effective Motion Practice; Handling Discovery Disputes; Tips on Trying your First Case; and The Mechanics of State Court Voir Dire.
Contact Kim Diepraam at (713) 224-4952 or hyla@hyla.org  for more information.

 Hope to see you at these upcoming HYLA events!
Please bring your HYLA eligible friends!

Volunteers Needed to Help With a New Project
Junior Judges

Junior Judges:  Helping Kids Make Smart Choicesis a public service project implemented through a curriculum and an accompanying video, hosted by two teenagers, that depicts elementary school aged students faced with challenging decisions.  The project includes seven units and addresses the subjects that affect the lives of the target audience, fourth grade students, including: cheating, destroying property, bullying, teasing, stealing, gangs/weapons, and drugs/alcohol.  Each unit in the curriculum is self-contained so that an educator may use one, all, or just a few of the units, depending on his or her preference and time.  Attorney involvement will include explaining the importance and necessity of laws and rules in society, and moderating the topic discussions following all or some of the video segments.
Please contact Kent Altsuler at kaltsuler@jw.com if you are interested in volunteering.

Volunteers Needed to Help
ADOPT AN ANGEL

For over ten years, the Adopt-an-Angel Program has provided a healthy dose of holiday cheer to over 500 underprivileged students who attend Grimes Elementary School. Children who otherwise would probably not receive gifts during the holidays are presented with clothing and toys donated by Houston lawyers and their staffs. Adopt-an-Angel committee members spend countless hours during a busy time of the year coordinating this impressive endeavor.
Each year, committee members ask every student at Grimes to fill out a "wish list." Although toys are always a favorite, most of the children also list basic clothing items (like socks and underwear) and school supplies. As soon as the committee members receive the lists from the school, they distribute them to attorneys and their staffs who purchase the items and wrap them for delivery. A few days before the students begin their holiday break, the committee members, with the assistance of Santa Claus, deliver the gifts to the children. The children are always delighted by this annual visit.
In recent years, the Adopt-an-Angel program has been so successful that resources have been used to provide holiday meals and extra clothing to families in particular need, to purchase school uniforms for almost 100 students, and to assist with gifts to a local foster care facility.
Please contact Kristin Tassin at kristin@drylaw.com if you are interested in helping.


Hello Team-

This is just a reminder about Thursday's (07/06/00) conference call regarding
the weekly Japan update at 6:00 p.m. Houston time. Please forward your
updates to Joe Hirl and please copy me. The call will be held in Conference
room 21C2 for Houston participants.

Domestic:   1-800-991-9019
Intern'l           847-619-8039
Code:            5764488#

I will forward the contact list as soon as I get the new numbers for all E.J.
employees. Meanwhile here is the new office address and phone number;

Enron Japan-
Otemachi 1st Square Bldg. West 11th Floor,
1-5-1 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
Phone: 813-5219-4500
Fax: 813-5219-4510

Lastly, please see last week's consolidated report:


We moved a total of $72,352 from Middle Market NYMEX to Middle Market - East
on 11/2/2000 in our Orig schedule.

EM

	From:  William Kelly @ ECT                           11/21/2000 09:34 AM

To: Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Craig Taylor

I think you guys have already taken care of this, but I can't remember if you
have moved the orig from April forward to East from MM Nymex for Craig.

WK


Jeff:

Remember the Centanna Storage Contract you reviewed a couple of weeks back.  It has never been signed I'm waiting on a few replacement pages from Duke.  Given the Bankruptcy filling is there anything special I need to do?  Do I need special approval?  Duke is being very cooperative and is trying to work with Enron to meet our needs.  If the term needs to be reduced they are willing to do whatever it takes.  I would appreciate your input as to what to do or whom I should talk.

	Thanks, Jim


.82 by .835


Lisa -

I would recommend that you send Mike Day the language to clarify #3.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mellencamp, Lisa
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 8:09 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Tribolet, Michael; Williams, Robert C.
Subject:	RE: Enron Notice and Motion for Relief from Stay.DOC

they are changing 1.
yes to 2.
3 i need help with.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 7:51 AM
To:	Mellencamp, Lisa; Sanders, Richard B.; Tribolet, Michael
Subject:	RE: Enron Notice and Motion for Relief from Stay.DOC

A couple of points --

1.	The language in the relief indicates that we are trying to "determine the validity and amount of PX Credits owed to EES and EEMC".  Is this correct?  Isn't our primary goal in this complaint to (a) have the Utility return the net credit to our bills and (b) to allow for recoupment againts all non-generation related charges?

2.	Throughout the document the idea of "T&D charges" is used.  I assume that this is shorthand for all non-generation related charges?  We pay CTC and public purpose costs as well as T&D.

3.	Not sure if CPUC regulates the ESPs.  The filing makes this case in the first paragraph.

Thanks,

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mellencamp, Lisa
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:02 AM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.; Tribolet, Michael; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	FW: Enron Notice and Motion for Relief from Stay.DOC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"SANFORD KINGSLEY" <SKINGSLE@LLGM.COM>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22SANFORD+20KINGSLEY+22+20+3CSKINGSLE+40LLGM+2ECOM+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:00 PM
To:	Huddleson, Diann; Mellencamp, Lisa; Williams, Robert C.; Curry, Wanda; Jbennett@gmssr.com
Cc:	CHARLES FERGUSON; CARL EKLUND; JOHN KLAUBERG
Subject:	Enron Notice and Motion for Relief from Stay.DOC

 Attached is a preliminary draft of a motion to the Bankruptcy Court for relief from stay in connection with the commencement of proceedings at the PUC.  Please favor us with your comments at your earliest convenience.

Also, when convenient, Carl would like to schedule a conference call to further define this motion and the next steps.

Sanford Kingsley
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 951-1119
skingsle@llgm.com

==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================
 - EnronNot.DOC << File: EnronNot.DOC >>


Kim, here are the responses to your request.

Kim.Ward@enron.com wrote:

> Bonnie,
>
> Sorry I am just now getting back - I was out of the office Thurs & Fri.
> What I am trying to determine is the rate that Long Beach wants to beat and
> what it is made up of - so I would say both transmission and commodity
> prices.  Let me know if you have any more questions -
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kim Ward
> 713-853-0685
>
> "Bonnie Ying" <boying@ci.long-beach.ca.us> on 03/22/2001 05:10:21 PM
>
> To:   Kim.Ward@enron.com
> cc:   Chris Garner <chgarne@ci.long-beach.ca.us>, Cynthia Gonzales
>       <cygonza@ci.long-beach.ca.us>
> Subject:  Request for Information
>
> Kim, just a clarification on the last question of your data request --
>
> By historical retail rates vs. SoCal's rates, do you mean the
> transmission rates or the commodity prices?

 - EnronDataRequest.xls


Chris:

My comments are as follows, and I'd like you to send a letter rather than an
e-mail:

Dear Jeff,

As a follow up  to your letter dated May 9, 2001, upon the posting of an LC
in the amount of $965,855 representing 5% of the price of unit 1, we are
prepared to pay GE the $1,501,885 deducted from our last payment. With
respect to liquidated damages on delivery of the air filter, we reserve our
rights under the contract to exercise our offset rights at a later date.

Please let me know when you will be able to have the LC in place, and we will
make appropriate payment arrangements.

Regards,

Chris Booth
Manager

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Chris Booth @ ENRON                           05/18/2001 02:39 PM

To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: GE payments

Kay and Ben,

I would like to send the following to Jeff Darst at GE via e-mail.

Dear Jeff,

Pursuant to you letter dated May 9, 2001 we are prepared to pay the deduct
for liquidated damages ($536,000) and retention deduct ($965,885) withheld
from the April 25, 2001 invoice.  Payment of the deduct for the liquidated
damages claim does not constitute a withdrawal of the claim, hence, we are
not waiving our rights afforded under the contract.  As stated in our letter
dated May 3, 2001, we are prepared to pay the final 5% payment for Unit 1
upon receipt of the Letter of Credit for $965,855 (5% of the price for Unit
1) and a lien release.

Regards,

Chris


Charlene:
Please forward to Victor also but for next month I'll need the first of the
month nominations asap in order to confirm all locations / total Index and
Gas Daily volumes for both HIOS and ANR.  Please let me know as soon as
possible and also send final revisions directly to me.  I will also need to
confirm totals verbally after you have send the final nominations for June 1.
Thanks,
Mark


You didn't include the form in your email below.  Please do and I'll take
care of it.

Liz Taylor

"MARCELA WHITE" <JETCHART@TAVAERO.COM> on 10/06/2000 02:39:24 PM
To: <Greg.whalley@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Credit Card Form

I faxed this to Mr. Whalley last week, and have not received  it back.? Could
you pls. check on the status of this and return to us  completed, via fax.?
Thank you. Marcela


Govenrment Names

Almost 150 yrs ago, President Lincoln found it necessary to hire a private
investigator - Mr. Alan Pinkerton. The function that Pinkerton established
actually was the beginning of the Secret Service.
Since that time federal police authority has grown to a large number of
three-letter agencies - FBI, CIA, INS, IRS, DEA. Now comes a proposal for
another agency: The "Airport Security Service."  Can't you see it now, the
new service in their black outfits  with their initials in large white
letters across their backs?


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000 05:54
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Robert Badeer                           07/11/2000 07:32 AM

To: Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: new build


-----Original Message-----
From: 	lisa barnwell <lisabarnwell1@yahoo.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Sunday, November 11, 2001 10:39 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:

Thank you very much for letting me stay w/you Thur.
nite.  It was great seeing you.  I am sorry things are
not going so well for you right now.  Life always
changes so you know it will get better.  You are
welcome anytime to come visit me in Ausin.  your email
address did not work kward1@houston.rr.com
Please resend this address.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com


Robin, Chris & Ed:

There are actually two agreements in place. The first is an Agency agreement (the one you have) with PPEP and Enron. For a fee of about $0.04/MMBtu, Enron does all of the activities associated with gas deliveries, nominations, scheduling and re-marketing of the gas for that plant. You are correct, it was never signed but is still being used.

The second agreement is a Management Services Agreement between PPEP and Enron. This agreement is for all other activities such as accounting, legal, environmental, etc.I believe any personnel hours are billed back based on this agreement. Rick Hill will inform you of more details and should have a copy. This one has been executed.

MM

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barbe, Robin
Sent:	Friday, June 07, 2002 11:48 AM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Schneider, Chip; Sharp, Greg; McConnell, Mike
Cc:	Germany, Chris; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Darmitzel, Paul; Hill, Garrick; Mazowita, Mike
Subject:	RE: ponderosa plant service events for gas days june 4, 5, 6

Ed,

Rick is out of the office until the 13th.  I am meeting with him at 10:00 on the 13th.  I had a conversation with Mike Mazowita at White Pines Energy.  Mike
is the liason between the plant and ENA.  He informed me that Ponderosa Pines Energy Partners (the plant) and ENA have a management agreement.
He said that ENA gets reimbursed based on time spent on behalf of the plant.  Apparently the agreement was never executed but the two companies
transacted as if it was executed.  I am out this afternoon and Paul Darmitzel is out this afternoon.  I am going to get Paul involved on Monday to see if the estate can be reimbursed for hours ENA employee spend on behalf of the plant.

Robin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent:	Thursday, June 06, 2002 6:45 PM
To:	Schneider, Chip; Sharp, Greg; McConnell, Mike
Cc:	Barbe, Robin; Germany, Chris; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Darmitzel, Paul; Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: ponderosa plant service events for gas days june 4, 5, 6

Yes it is, and we will try Rick.  However, I assumed this was part of Op-Co or an ENA asset in your world.  I think Rick is doing power terminated book recovery.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schneider, Chip
Sent:	Thursday, June 06, 2002 6:21 PM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Sharp, Greg; McConnell, Mike
Cc:	Barbe, Robin; Germany, Chris; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Darmitzel, Paul; Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: ponderosa plant service events for gas days june 4, 5, 6

I know nothing about any Enron relationship with Lonestar.  Is this possibly related to the Cornhusker plant in Cleburne?  If so, Rick Hill is the contact.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent:	Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:03 AM
To:	Schneider, Chip; Sharp, Greg; McConnell, Mike
Cc:	Barbe, Robin; Germany, Chris; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Darmitzel, Paul
Subject:	FW: ponderosa plant service events for gas days june 4, 5, 6

I do not know which, if any, of you guys is the right one to note this, but I wanted to forward for the appropriate person's attention.  If not you, could you please advise me of the right Enron person.

That said, I recommend that the person within Enron responsible for this deal make sure that liability to Enron under the fuel  management deal be fully understood.  We are doing what we can to minimize penalties or costs, but we are quite limited in options due to the bankruptcy.  Please let me know your thoughts.

Regards,
Ed

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barbe, Robin
Sent:	Wednesday, June 05, 2002 4:11 PM
To:	Brady, Kevin; Mazowita, Mike
Cc:	Germany, Chris; McMichael Jr., Ed; Barbe, Robin
Subject:	ponderosa plant service events for gas days june 4, 5, 6

Below is a summary of events over the last couple of days.  I hope we don't need.

Events of June 3

Gas service to the plant has been challenging.  Lonestar Pipeline is running a pig for June 4,5,&6.  Lonestar told us that roughly 60% would be cut. Apparently Friday, May 31, Kevin communicated to his scheduling counterparties the maintenance information.  He also indicated that our Lonestar	rep said the only safe scheduling points for the gas to come into their system was Lonestar-Carthage and Lonestar-Katy Plant.  Neither of the plant's suppliers -Apache/Cinergy or Williams provided gas at those points for gas day June 4.   Cuts did occur as we were warned.  Of the total nomination of 45MM, 17.1 MM flowed for today's gas flow.  The supplier breakout is Apache/Cinergy -20MM and  Williams-25MM.   Yesterday, Jeff Smiron at Lonestar said they would allow the plant to pull from their imbalance account for today's flow but they we had to have flowing gas for June 5 & 6.

I communicated the situation to Mike Mazowita at White Pines on June 3.  I also inquired about alternative fuel capability as a back-up.  The plant can burn No.6 low sulfur fuel oil.  Mike indicated that the plant would not want to do that and hadn't burned oil in quite some time.  I told Mike that I would use the possibility of alternative fuel replacement costs as leverage with the suppliers.  He inquired if I knew how Lonestar would cut back the plant.  I told him that I 	wasn't familiar with Lonestar specifically but based on my experiences in gas control from a previous life that for a plant of it's size they probably have remote control capabilities.  If not they would sent a field worker out to the meter station to adjust the valve.

The Apache and Williams supply contracts mirror each other in language.  The way I interrupt the contract language is that the supplier has the right to choose the supply point/points into Lonestar's system from a list of primary or secondary points in Exhibit A.  If the plant's transportation contract gets interrupted then the supplier has the obligation to deliver gas into Lonestar's system at a location that will flow on the plant's transportation agreement.  If the supplier shorts theplant then the supplier is obligated to pay for replacement costs for either gas or alternate fuels.  Yesterday, I communicated my interpretation of the agreements to Frank Fields at Williams and to Michelle Morgan and her boss Tom Strickland at Cinergy.  Tom indicated that there had been an amendment and I told him I didn't have a copy of the amendment.   Sounds like the amendment may have changed some of the delivery points.  I told Tom at Cinergy that 	my primary concern was flowing gas supply to the plant.  Tom was suggesting that this may be a force majuere event.  I told him I didn't interpret	the force majuere language that way.  The force majuere language addresses freeze-offs and line breaks but not maintenance.  I also told him that the contract has a provision for transportation interruption.

In any case I told Tom time was of the essence and I was focusing on the operational issues and not monetary issues.  I told him we could address the 	financial resolution per the contract after the event was over.  I told him that the financial resolution of replacement gas for three days was minimal in comparison to any potential damages incurred by the plant due to the pipe cutting back their gas supply.

Events of June 4

This morning I spoke with Michelle Morgan at Cinergy.  They are supplying 12.9MM at Aquila-Katy into Lonestar for June 5.  Williams is buying 10MM at Carthage and 5MM at HLPL for June 5.  Per Lonestar this should be OK for June 5.  Michelle had said she would pay back the shorted volume from June 4 after the pigging was completed.  They will  pay back the volume ratably for the remainder or in a day.

Russ Brown at Lonestar contacted Kevin around 12:30 to say the plant needed to cut back to the 17.1MM flowing gas volume for today.  The plant's burn rate was causing the pig to run to fast.  Russ is the manager of the transportation administration department at Lonestar.  I called Russ back at 1:10pm to inquire about the problem.  I asked him to call gas control and see when the pig run would be over and to see if there was a point that we could bring gas in intraday to help alleviate the problem.   I also called Mike to inform him of the new events.  Russ called back and said the run would be over at 12:00pm tonight and that the only interconnect location that could help was El Paso Field Services-Ennis.  He also indicated that the pressure had stabilized and the plant may be able
to make it through the run without the incremental gas.  I called Cinergy and Williams to see if they could make gas available intraday at the point.  Frank at Williams said they could not and Michelle at Cinergy said she would let me know.  At 3:30 Michelle indicated that they could buy the gas and the cost would be $0.95 to $1.00 more than the contract price.  She said that they didn't think Apache was liable for the costs because the requested meter is not on the delivery point lists in the contract.  They would buy the gas if we would agree to pay the price.  I called Mike at White Pines and ask him what he wanted to do.  He indicated that he wanted us me to buy the gas.  I called Russ to get an update and see if we could still do the nom.  Russ said the plant was burning more.  Now they were burning 48MM and requested they cut back to their nominated volume of 45MM.  I told Russ I didn't think that they could be I would call.  Mike confirmed that they could not.  He said had already called Brazos to see if they could back off even 20 to 30 MW.  He said Brazos is "playing chicken" and are requesting everything they have.   I told him I would call Cinergy and see if I could get them to nominate the gas and agreed to settle the financial side per the contract after the pigging event is completed.  I called Michelle with my proposal and she said she needed to talk to Apache and would call me back.  We agreed to nominate the intraday gas and work out the financial part after the event was over.  Michelle called back and said the gas was going to come from storage and due to pressure problems the gas could not be delivered.

Events of June 5

The plant made it through the June 4 gas day on gas.  I spoke with Michelle and she indicated that they were planning on serving gas day June 6 the same as June 5.  She said that Apache didn't think they were liable to make up the gas they shorted us for June 4.  She said I could talk with Pat Green at Apache regarding the issue.  Williams moved their gas from Carthage to HPL for June 6.  I left a message for Russ at Lonestar to check on the point.  I requested that 	Kevin do the same with his Lonestar contact.  Neither of us has had a return call from our corresponding Lonestar counterparties.  We will have to address the 	issue intraday if necessary.

I will keep everyone posted of any new developments.


As discussed at the recent DES meeting, whenever you need the RO's signature,
please use the attached form filled out as appropriate.  I need to review
permit applications and permit renewals only.  I do not need to review annual
compliance certifications, semiannual monitoring reports, emission test
results and any other air related documents prior to getting the RO's
signature.  (Make sure you remove my approval from the form for these
documents.)  I would like a copy of these documents (electronic or paper)
however.

Ruth


- Spread of Calif. Crisis Concerns Bush (washingtonpost.com).html


Hello everyone:

Vince would like to bring Jaesoo Lew in next week for an exploratory interview
with the Research Group.  The dates that would work best for us are:
Wednesday,
the 25th (AM), Thursday, 26th  (AM) and Friday, 27th (AM).  Please see if Mr.
Lew
is available for any of these times.

Thanks!

Shirley
3-5290

 - vitae2.doc

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
12:51 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
10/18/2000 12:29 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: position

Shirley,

I would like to  invite him to an interview next week. We should use his home
phone
number and/or private E-mail address.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
12:33 PM ---------------------------

"Jaesoo Lew" <pontgyn@hotmail.com> on 10/17/2000 09:59:01 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: position

Dear Dr. Kaminski

My name is Jaesoo Lew and I am referred by Dr. Wayne Lee.

Currently I've been working at Aquila Energy in Kansas City as an pricing
analyst since July 2000.  Since then, I have developed a natural gas storage
valuation model applying the swing options (forest method) pricing approach.
The price processes would be considered critical for the storage valuation
since a trinomial forest is required to value storage. Also the c++
programming using Excel DLL has been developed, too.

I attached my resume to this message for your consideration and am looking
forward to talking about an opportunity at Enron.

My home phone number is 913-649-0578, Dr. Kaminski, I will wait your call in
this week as Dr. Lee informed me.  If possible, please let me know your
expected calling day through the mail.  I appreciate your consideration.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Jaesoo Lew
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - vitae2.doc


How does Wednesday sound?


We do not maintain seperate book codes.
PL


- ARPA1.txt

Please see  attachment.
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************

 - eneresp.doc

     All,

     Please review the attached and come back to Wes or myself ASAP in case
     there are any doubts or comments on the contents of the document.

     Best regards,

     Gabriel

Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.


I am ready to finalize the letter agreement.  Please verify that Jeff McMahon
will sign for Enron Corp.  Thanks.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/21/2000
09:51 AM ---------------------------

David Roland@EES
04/20/2000 11:07 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: letter agreement between EES and Enron Corp.

Sara,

I tried again to get comments from Gareth but had no luck.  Let's go ahead
and print it out and get it signed.  Please be sure to insert Mark S. Muller
as the signee for EES.  His title is Managing Director.

David

Sara Shackleton@ECT
04/17/2000 01:47 PM
To: David Roland/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: letter agreement between EES and Enron Corp.

If the letter is alright, I can have it printed formally.  I never heard back
from Gareth with respect to any comments.  Just let me know what you would
like to do.  Sara

David Roland@EES
04/17/2000 01:41 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: letter agreement between EES and Enron Corp.

Sara,

One more reminder for you regarding the letter agreement.

Thanks,
David

---------------------- Forwarded by David Roland/HOU/EES on 04/17/2000 01:40
PM ---------------------------

David Roland
04/13/2000 10:24 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: letter agreement between EES and Enron Corp.

Sara,

We still need to get this letter agreement done for Hawaii.  Please give me a
call when you have some time to discuss it.

David

Sara Shackleton@ECT
03/31/2000 04:47 PM
Sent by: Kaye Ellis@ECT
To: David Roland/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: letter agreement between EES and Enron Corp.

Attached is the revised letter agreement between EES and Enron Corp.

To: David Roland/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: letter agreement between EES and Enron Corp.

Sara and Gareth,

We still need to finish this agreement and have it signed.  To my knowledge,
it has not been completed and signed.

David

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  David Roland                           03/30/2000 06:11 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: letter agreement between EES and Enron Corp.

Sara,

I'm on someone else's computer - I'm having all sorts of e-mail problems
today.

The business person on the  EES side to be signing this letter would be Mark
S. Muller.  He is a Managing Director of EES LLC.

I don't necessarily have a problem with the description of the back-to-back
obligations, but I'd like to know Gareth's opinion as to whether the language
is too broad.

David

Sara Shackleton@ECT
03/30/2000 04:38 PM
To: David Roland/HOU/EES@EES, Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: letter agreement between EES and Enron Corp.

Attached is a first stab at the agreement.  Please comment.


Please respond to Note to Jeffrey Dasovich

The July Update to the Retail Energy Deregulation Index (RED Index),
published twice a year by the Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets
(CAEM) shows Texas, Maine, and New York are making the most measurable
strides in promoting sustainable competition among electricity providers, as
customers throughout Pennsylvania retreat to their default providers due to
increasing wholesale prices.

The RED Index, which is the only known tool that objectively ranks states by
22 attributes on how they are restructuring their power markets, today
released the U.S. rankings for all 50 states and the District of Columbia,
in a 187 page report.  Key results included:
	1. Pennsylvania		66
	2. Texas			65
	3. New York			64
	4. Maine			62
	17. California			34

"These numbers underscore the importance of building a healthy foundation on
which electric competition can grow," said Ken Malloy, CEO of the Center.

"While California's crisis has brought a lot of positive attention to
Pennsylvania's model, many customers in the Keystone State are returning to
their original utility suppliers.  It underscores how important it is to put
the right fundamentals in place if consumers and suppliers are to benefit
over the long haul," Malloy said.

In rankings that included all of North America, the province of Alberta
actually would rank above all the states with a score of 68.

The mid-year RED Index also found that 62% of states expressing an opinion
indicated that their commission is not "less likely to take action on energy
restructuring as a result of the California crisis."

CAEM is an independent, nonprofit, think tank based in Washington, DC whose
mission is to promote an effective transition from the monopoly to the
competitive model of regulation.

For information about obtaining a copy of the RED Index, go to www.caem.org.

For more information, please contact:
Nancy Etkin at 703-532-6887 or netkin@caem.org

If you do not wish to receive announcements from CAEM, please put "remove"
in the subject line in a reply to this email.
424


Kate, verballed trade with Powerex, they show trade date as 4/26 as opposed
to our 4/25.  Please check with Mike.  Thanks


Enron Seminar Series in FinanceJones Graduate School of Management, Rice UniversityLuigi ZingalesUniversity of Chicagowill give a seminar at the Jones School on Friday, April 27,  "The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial Development in the 20th Century."The seminar will begin at 3:30 in Room 105.A pdf of the paper is available through the seminar website: http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jgsfss/.
Fu-Kuo Albert WangAssistant ProfessorJones Graduate School of Management -- MS 531  Rice University  6100 Main Street  Houston, TX 77005  Phone: 713-348-5404  Fax:     713-348-5251email: wangfa@rice.eduhttp://www.ruf.rice.edu/~wangfa/


Figure out how to print this file on one or two pages that is readable.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 07/17/2000
09:43 AM ---------------------------

Bob Crane@ECT
07/11/2000 01:35 PM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Newsprint Stats & Note on EOL/Clickpaper

John,

FYI Clickpaper should be up and running by the end of the month.  We will be
quoting mostly the same products as we currently do in EOL (except longer
term and one new physical offering).  We will also continue to make quotes on
EOL but probably with a wider spread.

Some newsprint stuff for you.  As with any other commodity, the inventories
and operating rate/capacity are the key drivers.


This request has been pending approval for  3 days and you are the alternate.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000077032&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000077032
Approver            : patti.sullivan@enron.com
Request Create Date : 11/21/01 12:00:00 PM
Requested For       : shannon.groenewold@enron.com
Resource Name       : Terminal Server - Remote Access Solutions <b>Houston General Purpose Solution</b>
Resource Type       : Applications


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000 09:56 AM -----

	Tana Jones
	12/08/2000 09:56 AM

		 To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Southern

Any thoughts on how you would like to approach this?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000 09:53 AM -----

	Chris Gaffney
	12/08/2000 09:46 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jan Wilson/TOR/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Southern

Tana - Thank you for your prompt response.  Given that we have precedents
between Enron and Southern do you think it would be a simple process to get a
separate ISDA in place between Enron Canada and a Southern entity or do you
think it would be easier to amend the existing to add the necessary
provisions, add the provisions into the confirmation, or replace the existing
with a Multicurrency Agreement?

CJG

	Tana Jones
	12/08/2000 10:37 AM

		 To: Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Southern

We have an ISDA Master Agreement (Local Currency-Single Jurisdiction) in
place with between ENA and Southern Company Energy Marketing L.P.  I am a
little concerned if Canada wants to trade under this pursuant to the Services
Agreement.  Being a Local Currency-Single Jurisdiction form, it does not have
tax and currency provisions that would enable us to do a cross border trade.
If you would like to do trades under this, we might want to consider amending
it to add the necessary provisions, adding the provisions into the
confirmation, or replacing it with a Multicurrency Agreement.

	Chris Gaffney
	12/08/2000 09:24 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Southern

Southern Company or Southern Energy North America, Inc. or another trading
arm of Southern Company.  The reason I ask is because Southern wants to do
some deals with us in Ontario and I wanted to know if we have already
negotiated ISDAs with them.

thanks
CJG

	Tana Jones
	12/08/2000 10:17 AM

		 To: Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Southern

We have lots of ISDA's in place with "Southerns", "Southern" who?

	Chris Gaffney
	12/08/2000 09:09 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Southern

Tana - Do we have any ISDAs in place with Southern?

CJG


I just spoke to Lavo and he said the same thing.   We are planning on offering Willis an Associate position in East Power.   I propose we offer 75k salary with 25k sign-on.   We would require a 90 day evergreen non-compete and payback of 25k retention in the event he left within the the 1st year.

Kim - Can you please prepare the offer package based on the above.

Thanks.


Do you guys get this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 12/28/2000
09:10 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Gaskill @ ENRON                           12/27/2000 05:14 PM

Sent by: Amanda Huble@ENRON
To: Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Tomaski/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Julie A
Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fundamental Weekly Newsletter

The Gas Fundamentals Team currently provides weekly analysis for production,
consumption, transportation & storage, and the power market.  Following is
the schedule for the release of these reports:

Production - Monday
Consumption - Tuesday
Transportation & Storage (East, West, Central) - Wednesday
Power - Friday

Each week you will recieve a copy of the reports via email.  The reports are
also located on the gas fundamentals website at gasfundy.corp.enron.com.  The
files are located in the "Publications" tab under a folder titled
"Fundamental Analysis".

Attached below are the most recent files...

Please call me if you have any questions or comments.

Chris Gaskill


Vladi, thanks for the invitation! I will be there, great choice by the way...

E~

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pimenov, Vladi
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:15 PM
To:	Marolo, Massimo; Ames, Chuck; Tonks, Colin; Pehlivanova, Biliana; Chilkina, Elena; Dronet, David
Cc:	Bondareva, Natalie
Subject:	October 2nd

Hey guys,

in light of my quickly approaching 26th birthday I wanted to invite you all to dinner on tuesday October 2nd. I hope that nice company (and plenty of alcohol) will help me to forget about my age for at least one evening.

So, what do you say?

The place: Buca Di Beppo (Massimo can translate it for you), 5192 Buffalo Speedway. Map is attached. The place is really nice, not too expensive and a lot of fun. I think we could reserve a private room.

Time: October 2nd  7:30PM.

Please let me know if you can make it so I would know the exact number of people.

Hope to see y'all there.

Vlad.

 << File: mqmapgen_v4.0[1].gif >>


Kim:

(See attached file: EPECONb BASE.doc)

This is EPE's base gas contract - from the GISB S-T contract model.

EPE's lawyer working on the contract with ENRON in 2000 was Mr. Will
Guerant at 512-495-8832.

Thanks,

Barry
 - EPECONb BASE.doc


Do you have interest in having a semi formal party at the guggenheim for our
ny counterparties?  was thinking it might be a good pr move.
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 09:35
PM ---------------------------
From: Margaret Allen@ENRON on 03/19/2001 05:23 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Guggenheim Museum

There will be a corporate lounge for you to congregate in.  Does that sound
good?  No problem on the thrity tickets.  I will hold them for you.  Let me
know if you don't think yo uwill be needing all of them. I can also get you
the formal invitations to send out if you would like.

	John Arnold@ECT
	03/19/2001 11:22 AM

		 To: Margaret Allen/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Guggenheim Museum

On Friday, will there be a private reception or area for us or will our
customers get lost in the crowd?
Probably thinking 30 invites for Friday.  Is that ok?

From: Margaret Allen@ENRON on 03/16/2001 10:23 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Guggenheim Museum

Hey Buster,

Hope you had a great time in Cabo! I'm so jealous.  I need a vacation
desperately!

I'm trying to get a commitment on numbers from the different groups for the
Guggenheim events.  Will you look over this document and tell me which ones
you would like to attend and how many people you would like to bring to each?
Of course, I need it ASAP -- what's new, right?!!

Thanks honey! Margaret


Warrick Dunn Likely Out - Keyshawn Johnson Better

Entire Story:
http://www.buccaneers.com/newsroom/newspage.asp?newsid=1754&backpage=

Clipped from the Buccaneers Website:

Friday's practice at One Buccaneer Place started without running back
Warrick Dunn, which means Sunday's game probably will, too.

Dunn was still in the training room when the Tampa Bay Buccaneers began to
pass and run the ball late Friday morning, and though he joined the team
onfield a few minutes later, it was in sweats and running shoes.

Afterward, Head Coach Tony Dungy made it clear that he does not expect Dunn
to play against the Vikings this weekend, and the same holds true for WR
Jacquez Green (groin strain).

"Warrick did not practice and Jacquez didn't practice," said Dungy. "I would
say there be doubtful, but other than that we have a shot to have everyone
else.

"Really, Warrick and 'Quez, unless they had a miracle recovery, probably
would not play. Right now, we're saying doubtful. We haven't ruled them out,
but we're as close to that as we can be, I guess."

Friday is often the best determinant for a player's readiness for Sunday,
and neither Dunn nor Green looked close to ready for the final full-scale
practice of the week. Dungy was concerned both about their productiveness on
Sunday and their potential for further injury.

"Today they couldn't go, couldn't run," he said. "Unless they can run full
speed by Sunday, we shouldn't play them. If they're not running full speed,
it's tough to get anything done and you are more vulnerable (to injury)."

This is the Buccaneers' final season as part of the NFC Central Division,
but Dunn keeps seeing dates on his farewell tour cancelled. A foot sprain
suffered against Minnesota a month ago caused him to miss the Bucs' home
opener with Green Bay on October 7. In that contest, FB Mike Alstott carried
15 times for 77 yards, including a late-game 39-yard breakaway that scored
the winning points in a 14-10 decision. It is likely that Alstott will be
the primary ballcarrier again this Sunday against the Vikings, though
running backs Aaron Stecker and Rabih Abdullah may also get their shots.

With Dunn entering the season as the designated number one rusher for the
Bucs' new offense under coordinator Clyde Christensen, Alstott has found his
carries somewhat limited. He has averaged just over six carries per contest
so far, picking up 132 yards and one touchdown on 31 carries. He has
averaged an impressive 4.3 yards per carry.

Wide receiver Keyshawn Johnson, who started the week as questionable but has
since been upgraded, also continued his path towards playing against the
Vikings.

"Derrick practiced today and went through," said Dungy. "He's doing fine and
should be okay by game time, I think. Keyshawn practiced and went through.
We'll see how they are tomorrow but they look like they could be able to
play."

That would mean the Bucs would still have the NFC's leading receiver in the
lineup, though his starting mate, Green, will probably sit the game out. If
he does, fifth-year wideout Reidel Anthony would take his place. Anthony has
34 career starts with the Buccaneers, two more than Green.

[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [  OUR VIEW  ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]

This pretty much sums it up.   Alstott moves up of course.   Keyshawn does
as well.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Bryant Analytics, Inc.   All Rights Reserved 1999-2001

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


- LV Cogen Due Diligence Index 101100.doc
 - LV Cogen Due Diligence Index.doc
 - LV Cogen II Due Diligence Index 101100.doc
 - LV Cogen II Due Diligence Index.doc
 - New Albany Due Diligence Index.doc


Martha, I would rather give the teams access to the Dashboard.  John Buchanan will be back
	in the office Wednesday.  You can coordinate with him and Terry Kowalke to get everyone
	set up.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Janousek, Martha
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 6:10 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn
Cc:	Barker, Courtney; Mason, Robert
Subject:	RE: Marketing Dashboard Access

Lynn - Below is a list of people that Courtney Barker(in Marketing) sends a couple of reports on daily index prices to every month.   Courtney is now posting these reports on the Marketing Dashboard.   Would you like to give your employees below access to the Dashboard or does Courtney need to continue sending the reports via E:Mail?    Please advise us and we will be glad to follow through.   Thanks so much!  Martha

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barker, Courtney
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 11:19 AM
To:	Janousek, Martha
Subject:	RE: Marketing Dashboard Access

Yes, I am referring to the people in Market Services, here is a list of who I am sending it to:
Jean Adams
Robert Benningfield
Sherry Forbish
Chris Greaney
Scott Hibbard
Randy Janzen
Terry Kowalke
Joe Linhart
Janet McDaniel
Debra Scurlock
Kathy Sturr
Harry Woodson

They all appear to be some form of Market Service Reps.
Just let me know!
Thanks,
Courtney

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Janousek, Martha
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 11:13 AM
To:	Barker, Courtney
Cc:	Brennan, Lorna; McCary, Sandy; Mason, Robert
Subject:	RE: Marketing Dashboard Access

Courtney - Clarification on .... (They have indicated to me that they do not have access to the dashboard.  Do we need to get them access to the dashboard or should I continue e-mailing them the report at the end of each month?)      Are you referring to people in Market Services and if so, what level are they?  Martha

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barker, Courtney
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 10:39 AM
To:	Janousek, Martha
Cc:	Brennan, Lorna; McCary, Sandy; Mason, Robert
Subject:	Marketing Dashboard Access

Martha,
As you know, Sandy McCary assisted me in getting my daily spot file report and MIP reports posted to the Marketing Dashboard.  At the end of the month, I send the MIP files to about 12 people in Marketing Services. I am no longer e-mailing the report to people in Marketing, since most are using the dashboard.
They have indicated to me that they do not have access to the dashboard.  Do we need to get them access to the dashboard or should I continue e-mailing them the report at the end of each month?
Thanks,
Courtney Barker
(402) 398-7130


yeah.  we can rent a hobie boat and go sailing


SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 11:42 AM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: Re: I'm coming home for Labor Day!!!!

Uhhhh - - - - - - -  Yea.  Whoo Hooo.  Hold me back.   I feel the
excitement.

Just kidding, hope your day is full of wonders!!!

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 08/29/2000 10:00:39 AM

To:   "'Campos, Alma'" <alma.campos@wcom.com>, "'Gallagher, Lisa'"
      <lgallagher@heritagetexas.com>, "'Klein, Mary'" <blarnich@aol.com>,
      "'Luby, Patrick'" <jpatrickl@poboxes.com>, "'Luis, Michelle'"
      <maluis@equiva.com>, "'Vachuska, Cindy'" <cindy.vachuska@enron.com>,
      "'Germany, Chris'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  I'm coming home for Labor Day!!!!

My flight is early Saturday morning... September 2nd. I should be home by
10
am. I leave late Monday night, 7 pm. I'll just catch a cab at the airport
on
September 2nd and will probably leave my car at the airport on September
4th.

Thanks again for everyone looking after my cat. If the sale of my condo
goes
as plan... I probably be back in Houston the following weekend to pack and
ship my stuff to Maryland. As these plans materialize, I'll let you know.

Alma, please continue to park in my space. I know you will have a rough
couple of months with your foot surgery. I'll just use your spot when I'm
home.

Thanks for everything... I'm so excited to come home!!!

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


You have received this email because you are listed as a data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000081087&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000081087
Request Create Date : 1/16/02 11:06:01 AM
Requested For       : john.oh@enron.com
Resource Name       : Enpower North America West Production Sched_read - Read-Only Access
Resource Type       : Applications