Ok - I also have the hotel taken care of on St Thomas now.  For Sunday the
28th, I will need to figure out how to cancel the hotel.

We can discuss tomorrow - bed time for me...greg
 Greg Pier
 Client Services Manager
 Closed-Loop Marketing Solutions
 gpier@doubleclick.net <mailto:gpier@doubleclick.net>
 [DIRECT] 212.497.4326
 [FAX] 212.655.7330
 [PAGER] 1-800-724-3624    PAGER PIN# 1434222
 E-mail my pager: 1434222@pagemci.com <mailto:1434222@pagemci.com>
(240 char. max)

 DoubleClick TechSolutions (DART, Closed-Loop, NetGravity)
 This October, DoubleClick merged with NetGravity to offer
advertisers and publishers the most comprehensive array of online
advertising technology solutions.  To find out why over 3,600 advertisers
and 10,000 Web sites turn to DoubleClick TechSolutions to answer their
online marketing needs visit http//www.doubleclick.net.

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Mark Taylor [SMTP:mtaylo1@ect.enron.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 10:45 PM
 To: Pier, Greg
 Subject: RE: Viva VI!

 Yes - and boats.  I wasn't too worried until the last update which
indicates the
 storm has lost forward momentum and is just drifting out there -
just barely
 east of due south of the BVI.  They are predicting that it will
resume its
 course in the morning and I sure hope so but anything can happen.
As of the
 middle of this afternoon, the Moorings was planning to let the
Friday charter
 starts go for sure - maybe even tomorrow's!

 "Pier, Greg" <gpier@doubleclick.net> on 11/17/99 09:38:44 PM

 To:   Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce Hutt <bhutt@ankarcapital.com>
 cc:   "Pier, Greg" <gpier@doubleclick.net>
 Subject:  RE: Viva VI!

 AA is fine - St Thomas.  All we need to do now is make sure there
are
 islands left to fly into.

 Thanks,

 Greg

      -----Original Message-----
      From:     Mark Taylor [SMTP:mtaylo1@ect.enron.com]
      Sent:     Wednesday, November 17, 1999 8:00 PM
      To:  Bruce Hutt
      Cc:  gpier@doubleclick.net
      Subject:  Viva VI!

      It does make sense that there shouldn't be a problem with
traveling
 to the USVI;
      since you have to clear immigration to get in there from the
BVI I
 wouldn't
      expect to have to clear again when you go back to the mainland
or
 Puerto Rico.
      We haven't spent much time sailing in the USVI so it would be
an
 exploratory
      trip for us - not at all a bad thing.  We can't get the boat to
the
 USVI till
      Monday (charter doesn't start till noon on Sun. and there's
tons of
 work getting
      all the food/drinks/ice etc. put away).  Best bet is to pick
Bruce
 up in St.
      John - Charlotte Amalie on St. Thomas is reputed to be a large,
busy
 commercial
      port - a great place for yachts to play dodge-em with the
cruise
 ships (not
      fun).  There is regular ferry service from St. Thomas to St.
John.
 We won't be
      there before noon on Monday.

      I just got off the phone with Greg so hopefully AA can do the
right
 thing here!

      "Bruce Hutt" <bhutt@ankarcapital.com> on 11/17/99 06:07:19 PM

      To:   Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, gpier@doubleclick.net
      cc:
      Subject:  Re: Lenny

      OK...guys the story is this:

      I have just spent the entire day at Federal Plaza with the INS
in
 extremely
      nasty conditions.  Basically, I was not able to get hold of a
travel
 permit.
      Vermont apparently has lost my documents including travel
permit and
 Federal
      Plaza cannot step in.  I cannot drive to Vermont, because they
only
 do
      postal.  I think I would feel slightly better had I known the
 outcome at the
      start of the day rather than at the end.

      Anyway, to cut a long story short, I asked the question of
whether I
 could
      goto the US Virgin Islands.  The first answer was "no", so I
 persisted and
      the second answer was "yes; can I point you to the US in the US
 Virgin
      Islands", so feeling very patronised but having achieved
something
 for my
      day at Federal Plaza I left.

      We now have 3 choices:

      1.    Go to US VI......I definitely cannot go to BVI
      2.    Delay flight a couple of days and hope that travel permit
 comes
      through (which it should because my lawyer)
      3.    Got to USVI and get permit sent on if it comes through

      G:  Please can you see about changing my flights to the US VI.
You
 are
      better at dealing with airlines than I am.....pretty please!

      B

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Mark Taylor <mtaylo1@ect.enron.com>
      To: gpier@doubleclick.net <gpier@doubleclick.net>; Bruce Hutt
      <bhutt@ankarcapital.com>
      Date: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 6:49 PM
      Subject: Lenny

      >
      >
      >Here's the current forecast for Lenny.  Shouldn't be  a major
 problem for
      us but
      >I feel for folks scheduled to go down there tomorrow and
Thursday.
      >
      >Bruce - we're still keeping our fingers crossed that your
permit
 will come
      >through.  Are you sure you've got the right lawyer working on
this?
 Seems
      like
      >he ought to be able to shake it loose somehow.  Anything at
all we
 can do
      from
      >here?
      >
      >(See attached file: track_LENNY.gif)
      >


Here are the individuals that CES Retail should contact for the respective
needs:
Current month (physical) - Chris Germany - 713.853.4743
Chris will quote current month as well as be the point person for all
transportation/delivery point/quantity/price issues related to the pricing on
current (Exhibits 1 & 2 of the GPA) related deals.

Prompt month forward (physical/financial) - Craig Taylor - 713.853.7131
Craig will quote prompt month forward and be the point person for product
pricing and product development.  He will work within ENA to get whatever
resources are needed for CES Retail price/product development.

Although I will be out of the office, I will try to call you tomorrow about
the co-ordination between the CES Retail offices in Pittsburgh and Herndon.
Page me at 800-503-8029 when you have some time to talk and I will call you
back.

Regards,
Ed


Please send me your schedule, sir!  Thank you!
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 04/09/2001 10:21
AM ---------------------------

	Joseph Alamo
	04/06/2001 11:59 AM

To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Schedules Request for Week of April 9th

Please forward your *anticipated* schedules for next week to me at your
earliest convenience.

Thanks in advance for your assistance.

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA


Station                               Tank #                    Tank
Size             Avg Daily Throughput

Driver                                         56002
66,000                     3,600

Garden City                              56003
30,000                     533

Wildfire                                      1524
10,000                     1,000

Windham                                  1445
10,000                     2,500

Mungalo                      1516
15,000                     2,000

Foster
787                            37,500                      3,000

Foster
790                            37,500                      3,000


We understand that the recent cases of Anthrax contamination and the possibility that biological agents such as Anthrax may be used in a terrorist attack are raising great concerns among Enron employees.  Many government and commercial facilities in the United States have already received Anthrax threat letters containing powdery substances.  Most of these have, however, been determined to be false alarms.  We have no reason to believe that Enron has been or will be the target of an Anthrax attack, but we want to provide all employees with background information on Anthrax and up-to-date guidance for handling any possible Anthrax exposures.

If you have additional questions or concerns, please contact Corporate Security in Houston at (713) 345-2804 or via email at CorporateSecurity@enron.com.

The most important thing to remember is:  Do not panic.  To infect someone, the Anthrax organism must be rubbed into abraded skin, swallowed, or inhaled as a fine, aerosolized mist.  Infection can be prevented after exposure to Anthrax by early treatment with the appropriate antibiotics.  Anthrax cannot be spread from one person to another.

Following are guidelines for identifying and dealing with suspicious letters or packages:

What constitutes a suspicious letter or parcel?  (Remember, these are only guidelines.  Use your best judgment when determining if a letter or package is suspicious.)

--  It is marked with the word "Anthrax."
--  It has a non-identifiable powdery substance on the outside.
--  It is unexpected or from someone unfamiliar to you.
--  Is addressed to someone no longer with your organization or is otherwise outdated.
--  Has no return address, or has one that cannot be verified as legitimate.
--  Is of unusual weight, given its size, or is lopsided or oddly shaped.
--  Has an unusual amount of tape on it.
--  Is marked with restrictive endorsements such as "personal" or "confidential".
--  Has a strange odor or stain.
--  Shows a city or country in the postmark that does not match the return address.

What do I do if I receive such a letter or package that I believe contains Anthrax?
--  Do not shake or empty the contents of any suspicious envelope or package.
--  Place the envelope or package in a plastic bag or some other type of container to prevent leakage of contents.
--  If you do not have any container, then cover the envelope or package with anything (e.g., clothing, paper, trash can, etc.) and do not remove this cover.
--  Leave the room and close the door, or section off the area to prevent others from entering (i.e., keep others away).
-- Wash your hands with soap and water to prevent spreading any powder to your face.
--  Notify your local building security official or an available supervisor.  Have them call 911 to alert the local police authorities.
--  List all people who were in the room or area when this suspicious letter or package was recognized. Give this list to both the local public health authorities and law enforcement officials for follow-up investigations and advice.
If you open an envelope or package and a suspicious powder spills out:
--  Do not try to clean up the powder.  Cover the spilled contents immediately with anything (e.g., clothing, paper, trash can, etc.) and do not remove this cover!
--  Leave the room and close the door, or section off the area to prevent others from entering (i.e., keep others away).
--  Wash your hands with soap and water to prevent spreading any powder to your face.  Report the incident to your local building security official or an available supervisor.  Have them call 911 to alert the local police authorities.
--  Remove heavily contaminated clothing as soon as possible and place in a plastic bag, or some other container that can be sealed.  This clothing bag should be given to the emergency responders for proper handling.
--  Shower with soap and water as soon as possible.  Do not use bleach or other disinfectant on your skin.
--  If possible, list all people who were in the room or area, especially those who had actual contact with the powder. Give this list to both the local public health authorities so that proper instructions can be given for medical follow-up, and to law enforcement officials for further investigation.


Please respond back with a date.  Thanks,  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000 12:27 PM -----

	Tim Belden
	11/17/2000 11:47 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Legal Support for Portland

I have discussed relocating Shari to Portland with both of you.  Elizabeth
wanted to make sure that she had hired at least one additional attorney
before Shari could move to Portland.  When I spoke to Mark earlier this week
he indicated that January 1st  was a reasonable deadline.  I would like to
get some closure/finality on this matter -- both from a business perspective
and to allow Shari to know what the future holds.  Let me know your thoughts.


Carol, thanks for your list. I have inserted some comments/responses on a
preliminary basis in the hope that it will help Encore focus on the issues.
I have not spoken to Mike Roach on the credit issues since receiving your
email.

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:57 AM
To: keith.ferguson@fmc-law.com
Cc: Edward.Sacks@enron.com
Subject: Encore Issues List

Keith:
As we discussed, here is Enron's legal/credit issues list on the ISDA:

1.   We cannot agree to cross-acceleration.
[KF: I assume you are referring to "Default under Specified Transaction".
Encore's view (and the view of a majority of its counterparties) is that
where the same parties have both physical and financial transactions
outstanding, a default under one category of transaction is sufficiently
significant that it should trigger a default under the other. There may be
reasons why Enron feels this is inappropriate, and we would appreciate your
comments.]

2.   There is a note that the cross default threshold needs to be
discussed.  Enron's $100 million threshold is based on the threshold that
its banks accept in its credit agreements.
[KF: In the transactions documented in November/December of last year, the
$100 million threshold was accepted as a materiality threshold in relation
to Enron Corp., and a $50 million threshold was accepted for Epcor Utilities
Inc.  I'm not sure why the reduction to $25 million for Epcor was suggested.
More importantly, I understand Mike Roach and Ed Sacks have been discussing
an alternative, which would be a percentage of net tangible assets, and that
Mr. Sacks was going to give that some thought.

3.   We prefer elective termination on bankruptcy.
[KF: Our concern is that creates a risk for the non-insolvent party in
relation to other creditors of the bankrupt party who may have automatic
termination clauses in their agreements. The short-form agreements signed in
late 2000 appear to accept automatic termination.]

4.   We prefer the Loss method.
[KF: Are you opposed to the non-defaulting party having the choice between
Loss and Market Quotation?}

5.   We would like to discuss with you your credit rating test for defining
the "materially weaker" standard in Credit Event Upon Merger as well as the
timing for posting collateral as it appears in this provisions as well as
the Credit Support Annex.  We believe that 7 Business Days is too long for
posting an LC.
[KF: I need to discuss the first point with Mike Roach. With respect to the
second point, we are advised by Epcor's treasury group that the time frame
is necessary, and that is part of the reason we wish to have cash qualify as
Eligible Collateral; if the time frame is required to produce an LC, we
would envision putting up cash within, say, a two Business Day period and
substituting an LC when it is issued.]

6.   We would like to make the GP of Encore a "Specified Entity".  We need
to discuss with you your request to modify the definition of "Specified
Transaction" to include physical transactions.
[KF: I assume this is related to your first point.]

7.   In the MAC Additional Termination Event, we would like to propose a
cure through the posting of collateral.
[KF: Agreed; I assume the value would be an amount determined by the other
party, acting reasonably?]

8.   We would like to discuss your proposed chnages to Section 13(b).
[KF: If Alberta law is to apply, we thought Alberta courts should have
jurisdiction. I understand that both parties have offices and conduct
business in Alberta.]

9.   We need to discuss the arbitration language.
[KF: For background, this language was proposed by Enron and is consistent
with the approach taken in the prior agreements.]

10.  We would like to understand why you want to change the definitions of
Default Rate and Interest rate.
[KF: Again, this was done to "Canadianize" the agreement. References to U.S.
rates when the currency is Canadian dollars didn't seem appropriate.]

11.  Why do you want to exclude Sections 7.3 trough 7.6 of the Commodity
Definitions Supplement?
[KF: I intended only to modify them as set out in the Schedule.]

12.  In the "Recording" section we would like to add the phrase "To the
extent permitted by applicable law" at the beginning of the last sentence.
[KF: Agreed.]

13.  We cannot agree to No Fault Termination.
[KF: This is a significant issue. In the event of a fixed for floating price
swap and a protracted disruption in the Alberta Power Pool price, my
understanding is that Enron would expect the swap to continue with the
floating price being determined hourly by quotes from two reference dealers.
Our view is that creates a significant risk to both parties that the
commercial basis for their agreement will be undermined and that No Fault
Termination is the better approach.]

14.  We cannot accept Surety Bonds as a form of collateral to secure
financial obligations.   Looks like LC's would be the only form of
acceptable collateral.
[KF: Mike Roach advised me about the Surety Bond issue. He also advised that
Enron has concerns about cash qualifying as collateral because of concerns
about perfecting a security interest in cash. Can you outline the concerns?]

15.  We need to discuss the credit threshold language as well as the
rounding amounts.
[KF: I understand that is part of the discussion between Messrs. Sacks and
Roach. I also understand Mr. Sacks is undertaking due diligence concerning
what he perceives to be the "political risk" in the Alberta marketplace, and
that this needs to be completed before the specific credit issues are
addressed. Can you confirm?]

16.  We need to discuss what constitutes an acceptable LC Issuer.
[KF: I expect both parties have LC facilities established and this point in
part involves understanding which banks are involved. If the Epcor
information has not been provided, please let me know and I will arrange to
have it passed on.]

I look forward to hearing from you.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

Regards,
Keith Ferguson
FRASER MILNER CASGRAIN LLP
<http://www.fmc-law.com/>
2900 Manulife Place
10180 - 101 Street
Edmonton, AB  T5J 3V5
(780) 970-5285 Direct Line
(780) 423-7276 Fax
keith.ferguson@fmc-law.com

This message, and any documents attached thereto, is intended only for the
addressee and may contain privileged or confidential information.  Any
unauthorized disclosure is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify us immediately so that we may correct our
internal records.  Please then delete the original message.  Thank you.


Marcelo:

Attached are my comments to your initial draft of Appendix C to the Canadian
form of repo agreement.  Please note the following:

(1)  You attached "Annex II" to the end of Appendix C.  That annex came from
the US repo with Merrill.  The information should actually be incorporated
into "Appendix A" of your repo agreement.

(2)  I am waiting to hear internally regarding substitution and a default
issue.

(3)  Please let me know if we have any issues on the Appendix C (and add a
reference to Appendix C at the end of your printed form).

We should be ready to execute shortly.

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000
10:44 AM ---------------------------

Damon Harvey@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/31/2000 10:36 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brad Hitch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject:

Mr. Shankman,

I hope all is well with you. Currently I am a second year analyst faced with
the dilemma of which career path to pursue.  Although there are several
options, I'm primarily interested in developing a deeper understanding of
Enron's market philosophy. Trading, risk management, and commodity
structuring all sound interesting to me at this point, but I want to go into
my next rotation with a clear sense of direction.

Brad Hitch, who I worked with over at Enron International, suggested I
contact you to discuss your needs as well as new developments in your group.
He thought you would be in an excellent position to assist me with my
decision.

My resume' is attached for your consideration. As you will see, I have a
significant amount of Investment Banking, and financial industry experience.
I know how busy you must be during this time of year, but I would appreciate
a few minutes of your time.

I shall call you during the week of November 14th to schedule a time for us
to meet. In the meantime, if you need to contact me, my number is
713-853-6818. Please leave a message if I'm not in, and I'll return your call
the next day.

I look forward to  speaking with you.

Sincerely,

Damon Harvey


Deadly Military Bomb Training Accident In Kuwait

http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/world/

ABCNEWS.com:  Up to the Moment, Up to You (tm)
http://abcnews.go.com
---
You received this mail because you subscribed via ABCNEWS.com at
http://abcnews.go.com/service/help/mailsub.html

If you would like to stop receiving these mailings, unsubscribe at
http://abcnews.go.com/service/help/mailunsub.html

Please do not respond to this mail. Questions or comments can be submitted at
http://abcnews.go.com/service/help/abccontact.html


Would you please give me a call to discuss the legal opinion.  After 10 am
Houston time is fine.  Happy New Year.  SS


Kay,

Thanks for the help yesterday, and thanks for remember ing the MS pledge.
Please make the check out to the National MS Society ($50).  I can come up
later.

Thank you very much,

Reagan


Hi tana,

Could you please give the same rights access to kathryn as mine. she is transfering from houston to london.

Many thanks

Regards

Xavier


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042008.txt


Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042914.txt


HOEGH GALLEON	25-Oct 12:00LT	25-Oct 10:00(UTC)
A) Position at noon:	N36?59.0'	E002?17.0'
B) Dist. From last noon:	414nm
C) Dist. To go to next port:	375nm
D) Next port:	ALGECIRAS		21-Aug 13:00
E) 1: Av. wind/sea	Wind:	NW5	Sea:	NW5
    2: Average speed	17.25kn	RPM:87.16
    3: BOG 	232.2 m3
    5: F.O Consumed	24 MT
    6: G.O. Consumed	0.0MT
    7: Average vapor press	Average Liquid Temp:
Tk1:	0.039	bar	-159.50	?C
Tk2:	0.038	bar	-159.44	?C
Tk3:	0.039	bar	-159.59	?C
Tk4:	0.038	bar	-159.51	?C
Tk5:	0.040	bar	-159.41	?C

Brgds Knut Bentzr?d
Master LNG/C "Hoegh Galleon"

E-mail: master.gall@hoegh.no
Teleph: Inmarsat tel.no. 330853910
Fax   : Inmarsat fax no. 330853913
Telex : Inmarsat B telex no. 330853915
Telex : Inmarsat C telex no. 430853910 (24hrs.watch)


I believe I missed the meeting when Netco duties were discussed.

I just want to verify the regional leads as they will be the eRequest security access approvers for Sitara and TDS.

Scott     -    East
Phillip    -    West
O'Neal   -    Texas
Darron    -   Central
Errol      -    Financial


Please see the review below, which I agree with.  Mark Greenberg is my elaw
expert.  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000 08:50 AM -----

	Mark Greenberg@ENRON
	11/22/2000 08:06 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: eLaw

Mark -

I reviewed the information below and the current functionality of the
website.  Basically, eLaw is a shopping center for legal information.
Currently only information related to Labor & Employment is available, but
construction efforts are focused on many other areas including Antitrust,
Corporate Securities, E-Commerce, Environmental and Intellectual Property.

Since it is a shopping center, it basically works like any other shopping
site.  You search for the information you want, whether it is an article,
legal brief or form document related to the desired topic.  Once you find
something you want, you move it to your "Briefcase" (or shopping cart) and
continue searching.  Once you have finished searching, you go to the check
out screen and, after checking out, down load the information, via e-mail, to
your computer.

As with the legal education site I have been looking at, the central question
is the integrity of the information.  Though it may have been developed by a
reputable source (e.g., Baker & Botts, Baker Hostetler, etc.), concerns as to
age, reliability, and specifically direct applicability, would always
prevail.  The information would be useful as a base or building block, but
there may be additional work to do in order to verify the information or
tailor it to the specific need (especially if the need has specific
jurisdiction requirements).

I would be more than happy to further review the product if you wanted to
pursue it.  However, as I indicated, usefulness at this time may be somewhat
limited given the limited topic areas covered.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	Mark E Haedicke@ECT
	11/21/2000 11:39 AM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: eLaw

Please review and give me your brief thoughts on this.  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000 11:38 AM -----

	Stephen R Horn
	11/19/2000 04:22 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: eLaw

Mark,

The Austin Ventures people in Austin who have invested in eLaw have had these
people contact me.  Curious for your perspective of the business plan in the
attached Executive summary  which I exerpted the following:

eLaw is partnering with some of the worlds leading law firms to build
comprehensive databases of proprietary legal analysis and work product that
are accessible online by attorneys.

By leveraging quality, branded work product -- including agreement forms,
briefs, memoranda, pleadings and checklists ) to a much wider audience than
has previously been accomplished, eLaw is creating profound new economies of
scale in the area where a majority of attorneys spend most of their billable
time: legal research and document drafting of transaction and litigation
oriented material.  By using material in the eLaw libraries, eLaw users can:
? Accelerate the research and drafting process by directly accessing a volume
and quality of materials that have previously been available only within
large law firms
? Increase productivity and efficiency and avoid &reinventing the wheel8 (or
paying outside counsel to do so), saving hundreds of dollars per hour
? Reduce fees paid to outside law firms by in-house counsel

Would you please give me a call when you have had a chance to review.

Thanks,

Steve Horn

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen R Horn/HOU/ECT on 11/19/2000
04:00 PM ---------------------------

Sandra Jimenez <Sjimenez@elaw.com> on 11/16/2000 08:39:42 PM
To: "'shorn@enron.com'" <shorn@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: intro./ Chris Pacitti at AV

Dear Mr. Horn:

Several weeks ago Chris Pacitti, of Austin Ventures, gave me your name as
someone who might be interested in learning more about eLaw.com. I have
attached an executive overview of our business for your review and would
appreciate speaking with you about the business opportunity. I will call you
next week to schedule a mutually agreeable time to speak. I will call you at
713-853-4520. If your phone number is different than the one Chris gave me,
please let me know.

Thank you in advance for your interest and I look forward to speaking with
you soon.

Sandra Jimenez
CEO
sjimenez@elaw.com
Phone: 512-493-3581
Fax: 512-257-7246

 <<Execsumm 11-15-00fin.doc>>

 - Execsumm 11-15-00fin.doc


Group,
When doing a buy-resale with Pacificorp, we need to agree on the buy and the
resale prices on the phone.  These prices need to be recorded in your trade
log.  We also need to now check the prices nightly on buy-resales with
Pacificorp when doing the SAR.  We are having numerous discrepancies with
Pacificorp because of problems with buy-resale deal entry.  I have listened
to several tapes where only the spread ($10 or $20 dollars) is mentioned.
Let's be sure to  establish these prices, do the confirms nightly, and make
sure we can continue to work closely with this counterparty.

On a separate note...please be sure to use two tags on any buy-resales.

Thanks.

Bill


Enjoy!
 - 20011218ERCOT_LOAD.XLS
 - 20011218ERCOT_FLOW.XLS


Mike, Below is a suggested scheduling/confirmation form.  Please let me know
if you have some suggestions to it.
And here are the power contacts for AE:

Main power scheduling contact:

Real Time Generation Control Desk
(w)512-322-6648
(p)512-322-2707
(fax) 512-322-6168
genecc@austinenergy.com

Alternate:

Larry Flores
(w)512-322-6137
(p)512-322-2703
(fax) 512-322-6168
larry.flores@austinenergy.com

Wayne Morter
(w)512-322-6138
(p)512-322-2695
(fax) 512-322-6168
wayne.morter@austinenergy.com

Power transactions/accounting

Hari Jagtiani
(w)512-322-6244
(fax) 512-322-6168
harendra.jagtiani@austinenergy.com

I'll follow up on the other open issues we have.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Curry, Mike [mailto:Mike.Curry@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 4:30 PM
To: Morter, Wayne; Woodard, Stacey; Sweeney, Pat;
leonardstanfield@austinenergy.com
Cc: Gilbert-Smith, Doug; Dean, Clint; Day, Smith
Subject: Enron Contacts for Sandhill

Wayne,

Here are the Enron contacts for coordination on the Sandhill plant:

Main Contact:

Clint Dean
(w) 713-853-0484
(p) 877-498-7808
clint.dean@enron.com

Clint will be calling and scheduling Enron's output from Sandhill the
majority of the time.

Alternates:

Doug Gilbert-Smith
(w) 713-853-9310
doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com

Smith Day
(w) 713-853-4201
smith.l.day@enron.com

Mike Curry
(w) 713-853-4258
mike.curry@enron.com

24 Hour Support
1-800-349-5527

Please cc: all of the above (except Mike Curry) on any e-mail
communications regarding Sandhill.  For any notices please call to
notify and follow up with an e-mail for our records.

Thanks, - Mike

 - Sand Hill Scheduling Form.doc


Jeff told me you are looking for the historicals for Cinergy and ComEd. This
is a change, for once you are the one looking for the numbers!

 I have attached the Cinergy for you. The ComEd and Cinergy Feb. I will send
to you a little later.

Ellen Clardy, Ph.D.
Power Markets Analyst
TradersNews
713/647-6603
ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com

 - Cin August.zip
 - Cin September.zip
 - AEP October.zip
 - AEP November.zip
 - Cin January.zip


Please let me know if you will be attending.
Thank you,
Alma
36503
-----Original Message-----
From: Carrillo, Alma
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:05 PM
To: Hotte, Steve; Hayslett, Rod; Barnes, Caroline; Boatman, Jack; Cady, Rachel; Gigliotti, Mark; Sawyer, Lisa; Licciardo, Jeanne; Brady, Andy; Kedwaii, Hasan; Chua, Adrian; Duff, David; Dunnaway, Tina; Kurniawan, Hendra; Nimmo, Stephen ; Plant, Steve; Resendez, Benito; Riojas, Gary; Swanson, Steven; Vanavech, Sue; Hoang, Joe; Herrmann, Jill; Lowry, Jennifer ; Hill, Larry; Gilchrist, Lisa; Waters, Margaret; Stacy, Don; Zhang, Richard; Kohl, William (Bill); Lehn, Terry; Mysyk, Andriy; Saffer, Lori; Abshire, Scott; Steward, Larry; Horton, Stanley; Hayes, Robert; Ayres, John A.; Villamayor, Federico; Ramirez, Jose A; Nguyen, Cuong; Ekperigin, Eyituoyo; Adams, Jean; Aldinger, William; Alvarado, Jesse; Angeletti, Donald; Armitage, Roy; Barnes, Rodney; Barry, Patrick; Barry, Richard; Bastida, Nancy; Bell, Bill; Bellard, Dannis; Benningfield, Robert; Berger, Larry; Betancourt, Ramona ; Black, Legale ; Blair, Jean; Blair, Lynn; Bodnar, Michael; Braswell, Keith; Brostad, Karen; Brown, Elizabeth; Brown, Sharon; Bryan, Randy; Bryant, Marian; Buchanan, John; Buehler, Craig; Calhoun, Rory; Callans, Nancy; Carr, James; Carrillo, Alma; Carter, Zuela; Chambers, Steven; Clapper, Karen; Coash, Steve; Cochran, Jeffrey; Collins, Marion; Conklin, Jacob; Coon, Galen; Cooper, Tim; Corman, Shelley; Cramer, James; Cummings, Helen; Dasilva, Esther; Davis, Larry; Dietz, Rick; Dobrinski, Jodi; Draemer, Mary ; Dunten, Deborah; Eldridge, Dale; Ellington, Michael; Floyd, Jodie; Forbish, Sherry; Garcia, Ava; Giambrone, Laura; Graves, Jerry; Greaney, Chris; Green, Alma; Hall, Margaret; Hanagriff, Richard; Hardy, Crandal; Hearn, Steven; Hebert, Thomas; Henley, Gaynel; Hernandez, Bert; Hess, Theresa; Hibbard, Scott; Holmes, Bradley; Howard, Jack; January, Steve; Janzen, Randy; Johnson, Alice; Kowalke, Terry; Kuehl, Toby; Laferla, Lynda ; Lee, Dennis; Linhart, Joe; Matheson, Maggie; McDaniel, Janet; McEvoy, Christine; Medeles, Gerry; Miller, Beverly; Miller, Christopher; Minter, Tracy; Monden, Bart; Moore, Jeff; Mulligan, Amy; Munson, Robert; Nacey, Sheila; Perez, Kim; Perry, Renee; Phillips, Mary; Porter, Diana; Ratliff, Dale; Reid, Byron; Rivers, Cynthia; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Scott, Donna; Scurlock, Debra; Skertich, Gerald; Spain, Ron; Spraggins, Gary; Steele, Patricia; Studebaker, James ; Sturr, Kathy; Summers, Toby; Trevino, Linda; Vasquez, Josue; Vaughan, Cara; Velen, David; Wagoner, Michael; Walden, Shirley; Ward, Linda; Washington, Kathy; Welsh, Edward; Wilkens, Jerry; Winters, Ricki; Woodson, Harry; Zadow, Raetta
Subject: Team Celebration

RSVP by November 26th, if you are planning to attend the Team Celebration.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 07:19
AM ---------------------------

John Hodge@ENRON
01/08/2001 05:21 PM
To: Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie A
Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sean
Boyle/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Tennessee's CanEast Project and Transco's MarketLink Expansion

Tennessee is finalizing their CanEast project which will scoop the
Independence Pipeline effort and allow Tennessee to deliver 280,000 Dthd into
Leidy beginning in 11/1/01 at the same time the first phase of Transco's
MarketLink begins.  The first phase of MarketLink has a capacity of 166,000
Dthd and the second phase is scheduled to begin 11/1/02 with an additional
130,000 Dthd.  Tennessee was the successful bidder on a recent open season
that National Fuel had for 19,100 Dthd of space between Niagara and Leidy.
Tennessee has executed a 10 year lease for the space.  They will use this
capacity and a 10 year lease arrangement that they are finalizing with
Dominion Transmission for Ellisburg to Leidy capacity to form the basis of
their CanEast Project.  The Dominion lease will allow Tennessee to use
unsubscribed Zone L to Zone 4 capacity and deliver approximately 260,000 Dthd
from the Gulf Coast to Leidy.  (Dynegy negotiated an index-based, revenue
sharing contract with Tennessee for delivery into Dominion using this
capacity for the 11/1/00 - 10/31/01 period).  Tennessee is currently
negotiating with shippers to subscribe to the CanEast capacity.  They are
willing to negotiate contracts less than ten years and have negotiated terms
that synch up with the second phase of MarketLink.  This should allow
available capacity from the Gulf Coast or Niagara to Leidy or secondary
delivery points such as Dominion (since Phase I of MarketLink is set) for one
year contracts.

As a reminder, firm shippers with binding contracts on MarketLink are:

Phase I (11/1/01 start)   Volume  Delivery Point  Comment

Aquila Energy Marketing    25,000 Dthd Manhattan(Con Ed) Option to change to
          11/1/02 start date
Consolidated Edison     30,000  Manhattan(Con Ed)
ConEdison Energy     10,000  Manhattan(Con Ed)
St. Lawrence Cement       1,000  Camden
Williams Energy Marketing  100,000  Manhattan(Con Ed)

Total Phase I    166,000 Dthd

Phase II (11/1/02)

Virginia Power Energy Marketing 100,000 Dthd Trenton-Woodbury Non-New York
PPL Energy Plus     30,000  Princeton Junction Non-New York

Total Phase II    130,000 Dthd

Transco has until the end of April 2001 to file additional binding executed
contracts with the FERC for an additional 404,000 Dthd of Leidy to New York
capacity or the MarketLink Expansion as approved by FERC will be limited to
the 296,000 Dthd of the first two phases.


Go Dick.


What's up in the hood?  It sounds like you guys live in Compton instead of
San Diego?  Make sure Emma starts packing when she starts kindergarten.  If
she is strapped, she can shoot back at these SOBs.  Yet another reason Texas
is better than Cali - we all have guns so no one shoots up schools because
they know someone else has got heat and might put a cap in their ass.

Do you guys want me to order you Jazz Fest tickets when I order ours?  I am
putting in an order for alot of people because if I mail order them it only
costs $3 total as opposed to ticket master's $3 fee per ticket.  Since I am
ordering ours this way, I can order everyone's and they only pay the ticket
price(I eat the $3 because I am doing ours this way anyway).  The tickets are
$15 through the mail per day as opposed to $20 at the gate and $18 through
ticketmaster.  Let me know.  I am ordering all three days for ashley and I
hoping we go all three days.
PL


Thanks

I am not quite there I am afraid. Are you saying that the folks outside NY
and London have no autonomy and are merely acting on trading instructions
issued by the London or NY trading desks ? If that is the case:

Why don't NY and London do the deals themselves and let the locals
concentrate on generating business ?
There should be no "Chicago Book" (SCRP) for example
That conflicts with the "envelope" which you mention, which appears to be a
delegated trading authority, in which case we are back to "square one" it
would appear.

Help me out.

DP

To: David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT,
Robert Soeldner/LON/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Fleming/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcelo
Parra/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Authorised Traders : Montreal & Chicago

David

The set-up for the financial trading is similiar except that the instructions
are relaid by e-mail each night to New York and Tokyo.  Tim Pateman
(authorised trader in London) sends details of positions and instructions on
prices / volumes.

The mail provide directions on pricing (off set basis on EOL) and volumes,
creating an envelope in which they can trade.
They  must call for further instructions if the price shifts by more than $10
($100 for Tin & Nickel)  or the position by more than 100 lots.

Regards
Andy

Tim Poullain-Patterson
09/11/2000 15:27
To: David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike
Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Soeldner/LON/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Fleming/LON/ECT@ECT,
Marcelo Parra/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA

Subject: Re: Authorised Traders : Montreal & Chicago

David,

The business model you outline is actually the one we are implementing with
one big difference - the Head Trader in London (Sam Hainsworth) calls the
sales person each day to tell him what to do before they speak to any
customers. As you point out, these conversations are recorded so if the sales
person does anything other than what is agreed at the outset of each day,
then they will be red carded.

I refer you back to the memo supplementing the updated list of authorised
traders that I sent out and which Marcelo and Sam have discussed with
Commercial staff in both these offices (Shona and Bjorn have this memo), as
well as Marcelo's operational plan.

Clarification point - when Andy says "internally" he means that Commercial
(Rob Soeldner) is taking a lead in resolving Joe Robertson's concerns.

Regards,
Tim

From:  David Port @ ENRON
        09/11/2000 13:52

To: Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT,
Robert Soeldner/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT, Lloyd
Fleming/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Authorised Traders : Montreal & Chicago

How about this for a business model for an origination and trading outfit.

salesperson talks to customer
customer agrees to trade
salesperson phones trading desk and gets price (trading desk is London or NY
- NB: all lines are taped)
salesperson tell customer
customers says ok
salesperson says "done" to customer and trading desk
trading desk books deal, middle and back office processes kicks in, sends out
and chases up confirm etc
accounting process identifies value added by salesperson and gives them a
piece of the price as a credit
no bank accounts or signing authority in sales office
no accountants, middle office people or other similar humans in the sales
office, just sales people
all hedging and risk taking resident in trading books in NY or London

Can we not make this work ?
DP

To: Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona
Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Soeldner/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Authorised Traders : Montreal & Chicago

Bjorn

As discussed, given Joe's comments below, a note to confirm that this being
dealt with internally.

Rob Soeldner has made it clear to Joe that:

Enron places great importance on trading controls. These are non-negotiatable.
The suggested course of action is not an option
We aren't seeking to close any of the Agency offices given implemetation of
these controls.

Joe is not in yet - Rob will be discussing with him further when the US gets
in.

Of note - Joe is on the commercial side,  Marcelo Parra who is responsible
for the operational side is fully onboard for the operational changes made.

Regards
Andy

---------------------- Forwarded by Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT on 09/11/2000
11:07 ---------------------------

Joe Robertson@MGUSA
08/11/2000 20:38
To: Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Fleming/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcelo
Parra/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Michael Farmer/EU/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Naomi
Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Soeldner/LON/ECT@ECT, Sam
Hainsworth/EU/Enron@Enron@ECT

Subject: Re: Authorized Traders : Montreal & Chicago

As a practical matter the procedures outlined are not workable. We need to
find a way to go forward that works and can satisfy all concerned.

Either the people in these offices can be entrusted to transact and execute
business or we should consider closing these offices and relocating some of
the people which I do not believe makes any sense at all.

Joseph E. Robertson, Jr.
Enron Metals & Commodity Corp.
520 Madison Avenue
28th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212.715.5254
Fax: 212.715-2357
E-mail: joe.robertson@enron.com


Start Date: 2/4/02; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020410.txt


de nada

Carolina Waingortin@ENRON
08/11/2000 07:12 AM
Sent by: Carolina Waingortin@ENRON
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Hi !

Thank you for your help

C.

Scott Neal@ECT
08/07/2000 03:19 PM
To: Carolina Waingortin/SA/ENRON@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Hi !

Hola, Carolina. Un gran besito a vos.

I htink that Victor LaMadrid can help you and he speaks spanish, too.  Tell
everyone in BA  "hola".

Carolina Waingortin@ENRON
08/07/2000 08:23 AM
Sent by: Carolina Waingortin@ENRON
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hi !

Do you remember me? If so, thanks ! !

I am sending you this mail since I will like to ask you something, I need to
contact someone who works on gas schedulling in order to ask for some help.

Can you help me with that?

Besos desde Argentina !

C.


David,

I want to discuss Paul Henking's proposed strategy and Neale Gregson's
comments with you today, if possible.  I'll give you a call later.  Thanks.

Britt
----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 11/08/2000 06:08 AM -----

	Michael A Robison@ECT
	11/08/2000 02:14 AM

		 To: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: paul.henking@enron.com, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: pacific virgo contamination

Hi Britt:
Greetings from Singapore.  I'm slowly getting over my jet-lag.  It's great to
be here and I'm looking forward to the rest of my stay.  On the Pacific Virgo
front I wanted to forward to you Paul Henking's views to get your comments.
Also, I talked to Neale Gregson today and he is very opposed to the selection
of Mark Hamsher as the arbitrator since in his experience Mark has been a
maverick and is not a lawyer. Neale believes we need a Queen's Counsel as an
arbitrator. Neale will be discussing this issue with David Best tonight.
Thanks again for that great lunch!
Best regards,
Mike
EB3859
(713) 853-6667 DID
(713) 646-4842 FAX

----- Forwarded by Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT on 11/08/00 03:39 AM -----

	Paul Henking
	11/08/00 03:19 AM

		 To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: pacific virgo contamination

matt/mike,

tried to call matsuru/mitsubishi this afternoon but he was in a meeting. i
will try later and let you know if i get hold of him.

in the meantime, i do have some concerns with mitsubishi taking us to
arbitration for the outstanding frt and demurrage we owe on the pacific
virgo. if this goes to arbitration, i am sure we will lose and have to pay
the amounts due. i understand a decision has to be made before the end of
this week.

of course, going to arbitration would give us the opportunity to present our
claim for the contamination as a counter claim. however, i feel sure the
arbitrators will say pay the freight/demurrage now and make the claim a
separate issue.

from below, our insurance company has been advised of the contamination claim
and i feel this is a valid claim. obviously, we loaded one spec which was in
order and the vessel arrived with a different spec.  however, rather than
going to arbitration and incurring additional expenses, i feel we should be
letting the insurance company handle this with the owner's insurance company

granted, with the insurance companies, this could, and probably would, take
some time (1-2 years) and we may still not get money out of it if the owners
can prove their position. however, going to arbitration may not be any more
successful and would be final.

in summary, i would suggest paying the outstanding freight with advices to
mitsubishi that we will turn our attention to the demurrage claim and revert
by the end of the month. there is a big difference in going to arb for
$760,000 vs. only $259,000. this advice would be without prejudice to our
contamination claim which will now increase by the amount of the freight and
the amount of the demurrage.

at the same time, we should advise the insurance company that we have been
unsuccessful in negotiating any settlement by offset of freight and demurrage
and request they proceed with the contamination claim against the owners. we
can send them the letter legal/i sent to mitsubishi outlining our claim
mentioning that this amount will now increase due to the freight and
demurrage costs.

you may want to discuss this with britt davies but i see no way we will win
on the freight payment issue if this goes to arbitration.

rgds

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Henking/SIN/ECT on 08/11/2000 11:01
---------------------------
Michael J Gasper   07/11/2000 22:34

To: Paul Henking/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric Tan/SIN/ECT@ECT, James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, john.h.harrison@enron.com
Subject: pacific virgo contamination

I have not been directly involved in this claim.  Talked to Jim Studdert this
morning - underwriters have been notified of the claim, however claim is on
hold pending settlement with vessel owners.  Suggest Singapore coordinate
directly with Jim Studdert.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Paul Henking                           11/06/2000 10:04 PM

To: Michael J Gasper/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: pacific virgo contamination

mike,

in talking to eric, he says you have reported this claim to insurance. was
just wondering where we stood on this matter as there are things going on
over here.

as an update, mitsubishi is taking us to arbitration for the outstanding frt
and demurrage which understand totals about $7-800,000.

legal here has submitted a letter under my name claiming our damages are
about $1.5-2.0 mil. we were trying to settle this claim but getting nowhere
on this matter.

rgds


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Natural Gas Delivered on Saturday, October   27, 2001 thru Monday, October   29, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Friday, October   26, 2001)
Click here to access index history .
                                                                                * volume represents sell-side only *

Region     Hub	High	Low	Wtd Avg Index	Change ($)	Vol (mmBtu)	Hub Name
 LOUISIANA
    ANR SE	          $3.0700	          $2.9800	          $3.0139	-    .1067	         667,500	American Natural Resources Pipeline Co. - SE  Transmission Pool
    Columbia Onshore	          $3.0900	          $3.0050	          $3.0530	-    .0677	         438,300	Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. - Onshore Pool
    Henry Hub	          $3.1100	          $3.0000	          $3.0478	-    .0936	       4,043,400	Henry Hub tailgate - Louisiana
    NGPL LA	          $3.0400	          $2.9400	          $2.9948	-    .1135	         716,100	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Louisiana Pool
    Tenn 500L	          $3.1750	          $3.0150	          $3.0430	-    .1074	         636,900	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 500 Leg Pool
    Tenn 800L	          $3.0450	          $2.9800	          $3.0225	-    .1136	         302,100	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 800 Leg Pool
    TETCO ELA	          $3.0850	          $3.0100	          $3.0494	-    .1185	         710,100	Texas Eastern - East LA
    TETCO WLA	          $3.0600	          $2.9900	          $3.0244	-    .1228	         106,500	Texas Eastern - West LA
    Transco 65	          $3.1250	          $3.0600	          $3.0950	-    .0917	         286,800	Transco - Station 65
    Trunkline ELA	          $3.0500	          $2.9800	          $3.0124	-    .1426	         193,500	Trunkline Gas Company - East Louisiana Pool
    TxGas SL	          $3.0400	          $3.0100	          $3.0272	-    .0804	         340,200	Texas Gas Transmission Corp.-Zone SL FT Pool
 MIDCONTINENT
    MichCon, citygate	          $3.2800	          $3.1500	          $3.2180	-    .1793	         465,000	Michigan Consolidated
    NGPL Midcont	          $2.9700	          $2.8400	          $2.8770	-    .1748	         533,100	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Mid-Continent Pool
    NGPL Nicor, citygate	          $3.2000	          $3.0900	          $3.1331	-    .1582	       1,325,400	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nicor Citygate
    NGPL NIPSCO, citygate	          $3.1750	          $3.1000	          $3.1270	-    .2090	         160,500	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nipsco Citygate
    NNG Demarcation	          $3.0300	          $2.9400	          $2.9708	-    .2654	         841,500	Northern Natural Gas, Demarcation Pool
 NORTHEAST
    Columbia TCO	          $3.5150	          $3.3350	          $3.4015	-    .0745	       1,374,300	Columbia Gas Co. - TCO Pool
    Dominion So.Point	          $3.4450	          $3.3800	          $3.4061	-    .0991	       1,158,000	Dominion - South Point
    TETCO M3	          $3.5000	          $3.4000	          $3.4278	-    .2013	         578,700	Texas Eastern - M3 Zone
    Transco Z-6 (NY)	          $3.6700	          $3.5000	          $3.5662	+    .0203	         797,700	Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. - Zone 6 (NY)
 WEST
    El Paso non-Bondad	          $2.6400	          $2.4200	          $2.5350	-    .3942	         669,000	El Paso - San Juan Basin, Blanco Pool
    Huntingdon/Sumas	          $2.6600	          $2.5500	          $2.6000	-    .3133	         417,600	Westcoast Energy & Northwest Pipeline Corp.
    Opal	          $2.5400	          $2.3900	          $2.4346	-    .4758	         210,000	Opal
    PG?Citygate	          $2.8200	          $2.6600	          $2.7522	-    .4946	         351,000	PG?- Citygate
    SoCal Border	          $2.8900	          $2.7650	          $2.8306	-    .2531	         188,400	Southern California Border Points (Ehrenberg,Topock,Needles)
 WEST TEXAS
    El Paso - Keystone	          $2.8500	          $2.6700	          $2.7158	-    .2735	         882,900	El Paso - Keystone Pool
    Waha	          $2.8900	          $2.7550	          $2.8024	-    .2190	         477,600	Waha Hub - West Texas

                                                                                Includes all firm physical fixed price trades done from 7 AM to 11:30 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for natural gas delivered on the specified date(s).
                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.
You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com .
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe .
                                                                                ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001
12:08 PM ---------------------------

Dan J Hyvl
01/12/2001 12:13 PM
To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: City of Palo Alto, California

Chris,
 Kim Ward asked me to forward this draft of the proposed Enfolio contract to
you so that you could give it to her.  She said that she would send it to the
city for its review.  The draft contains certain blanks which the city's
counsel needs to provide.  Please call if you have any questions.


Holly Keiser
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Phone: 713-345-7893
Fax: 713-646-3490
Location: EB 3887
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


Not yet.  May not be until sept 5 as ken is on vacation.  but there is a
chance that ken will try to reach him in the meantime.  I'll let you know
when I hear.

	From:  Chris Long                           08/21/2000 03:22 PM

Sent by: Amy Fabian
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: CFTC call to Gramm

Steve - Missed you in LA last week.  Thanks for working with Ken on the CFTC
talking points.  Do you know if the call between Ken and Sen. Gramm occured
and if there was any follow up needed.

Thanks - Chris


Dave,

Greg is requesting Enron Americas' 2001 Goals & Objectives (no more than 3 to
4 each) asap.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor x31935


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude50.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas50.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil50.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded50.pdf

Brent Crude   http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/brent50.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG50.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG50.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL50.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


How depressing would it be to be at EECC?

From: Kathleen Carnahan/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 04:24 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: FW: Escrow Agreement

And you know I appreciate it and am soooo glad to be over here.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 4:22 PM
To: Carnahan, Kathleen
Subject: RE: FW: Escrow Agreement

Glad I gave you such a GLOWING review.

From: Kathleen Carnahan/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 04:17 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Booth/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: RE: FW: Escrow Agreement

I am printing the Fee Agreement right now.  It is my understanding Marisa
Reuter is reviewing the Escrow Agreement, so I plan on calling her tomorrow
for her comments.  Then, the plan is to find out how many need to be executed
and get the ink.

Also, I am revising the Incumbency Certificate right now to be signed by
Duran, Presto and Tricoli.  Kay, I will bring for your initials in a few
minutes.

K-

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 4:15 PM
To: Booth, Chris
Cc: Carnahan, Kathleen
Subject: Re: FW: Escrow Agreement

I've volunteered Kathleen to help process the paper.

ckm

From: Chris Booth/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 02:12 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: FW: Escrow Agreement

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Young, Michael" <Michael.Young@northwestern.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Young+2C+20Michael+22+20+3CMichael+2EYoung+40northwester
n+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Booth, Chris
Cc: 'margueritekahn@paulhastings.com'
Subject: Escrow Agreement

Chris, per our conversation this afternoon, this e-mail will document the
fact that, due to travel schedules, NorthWestern is unable to obtain the
necessary officer signatures for the incumbency documents requested by
Citibank as part of establishing the escrow arrangement called for under the
Letter Agreement.  You agreed that NorthWestern could complete the necessary
paperwork with Citibank on Tuesday of next week.  Thanks again for your
flexibility.

Michael J. Young
Senior Corporate Counsel
NorthWestern Corporation
125 S. Dakota Avenue
Sioux Falls, SD  57104
Fax:  605/978-2840
Phone:  605/978-2836
Cell:  605/351-4040


Shirley,

No info in this msg.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
08/16/2000 09:56 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo
Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia Tlapek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava
Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton
Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Yana
Kristal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samer
Takriti/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chonawee Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shalesh
Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Elena
Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cantekin Dincerler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
Aimone/NA/Enron@Enron, Datren Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Sevil
Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sofya Tamarchenko/NA/Enron@Enron, Bob
Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Ainsley Gaddis/NA/Enron@Enron, Gwyn
Koepke/NA/Enron@Enron, Guiseppe Paleologo/NA/Enron@Enron, Hector
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Youyi Feng/NA/Enron@Enron, V
Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shane Green/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: New Co.# and RC# for the Research Group


Randy, Becky and I just had a conference call with John Kroeger, attorney in
FERC's  Market Oversight and Enforcement Office, about the data request we
just received from them regarding gas deals into California for May 2001.  We
explained that the data request we just received was in many regards
identical to the one FERC staff sent us in December and which we answered in
January and we directed him to that response, both for the explanation of how
our business works and why we can therefore cannot answer the questions as
they were framed, and also for an example of what the data will look like for
the new time frame, if we submit it.  (We may have to file written consent
for Kroeger to review this previously filed data, which we agreed to do).
Mr. Kroeger stated they wanted the data request to be construed with common
sense (a refreshing notion).  He agreed that the"contracts" they want would
just be deal tickets for the applicable time frame.  He also indicated a
willingness to extend the time so that we can file information when we get it
in due course.  He will get back to us after he looks at the info already
filed in the SDG&E complaint.


1.  Per my discussion last week with David Minns, I sent him a spreadsheet so
he could scroll across the product list and see the full range of products
EnronOnline offers so he could determine whether an Australian based
counterparty will have any legal problems entering into any of the
EnronOnline products.  It was my understanding that he had not seen a
comprehensive list off all the products we offer.

2.  However, on a going forward basis, David Minns or someone in Legal will
need to see the daily spreadsheets reflecting any new Australian based
counterparties because every new counterparty requesting a password needs a
Credit and a Legal signoff for trading every products we offer, whether
physical, financial, power, gas, liquids, weather, p&p, US, European or other
country based product, etc..  Houston Legal does it every day for every new
Houston Credit based counterparty, London Legal does it every day for every
new London Credit based counterparty and Australian Legal will need to do the
same.  If some other system will be in place in Australia, David Minns will
need to discuss that with Mark Taylor and David Forster.


Please see below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES on 04/24/2000
08:29 AM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
04/21/2000 07:56 AM
To: Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Reg. Information - Interconnecting Generation in the East

Please forward to entire group- This is an example of an outstanding memo
that conveys critical information to our commercial counterparts- to the
point and very relevant-- it is a model to emulate.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 04/21/2000
07:53 AM ---------------------------
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rodney
Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, James A Ajello/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Ondarza/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kellie Metcalf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, David L
Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie Chance/Corp/Enron@Enron, Oscar
Dalton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Raimund
Grube/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray Hoppe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey M
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron, George
McCormick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clay Spears/HOU/ECT@ECT, Webb Jennings/HOU/ECT@ECT, W
David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, James L
Noles/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Art
Bieser/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Howe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cuthbert
Roberts/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Gaffney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney
C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Frank/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Woulfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Reg. Information - Interconnecting Generation in the East

This is a brief primer to assist you with current policy regarding
interconnecting generation plants in the East.  Please forward this to your
groups.  Thanks.  Christi Nicolay 37007  EB3108h.  I am available for your
federal/FERC regulatory questions and can point you to the correct
state/regional regulatory people.

When initially deciding where to site a plant, there are several federal
regulatory issues to consider:

First, you will need to obtain the utility's interconnection policy and a pro
forma interconnection agreement from the utility.  For most utilities, you
will need to call them to obtain their policy and agreement.  Some utilities
have this available on their OASIS computer site or web page.  The OASIS
sites have areas that do not require a password, but if the information is
not available in that area, you should contact the power trading desk
transmission personnel to assist in locating the information.  If a utility
says it does not have a policy, you can let me know.

The interconnection procedures typically require you to send in a request for
the utility to study the interconnection (Typically, app. $10,000).  When you
return the money and the request (which is usually an agreement that must be
initialled by ENA legal), the project will be placed in the "queue."  The
queue is usually available on the OASIS.  If the utility does not post the
queue, let me know.

Many times the procedures require the project to meet "milestones" in order
to remain in the queue.  If the milestones look unreasonable, let me know.

FERC (the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) recently issued an order
(Tennessee Power case) in which FERC stated that asking for "interconnection"
is separate from a request for "transmission" under a utility's Open Access
Transmission Tariff (OATT).  Enron and others had lobbied FERC to issue an
order dealing with interconnection.  Many utilities will try to charge
additional "network upgrade" costs, not simply the costs to interconnect.
This is not allowed under the new FERC rule (Note: PJM and NEPOOL have
different rules due to their pool structure).

In addition, in the Tennessee Power case, FERC stated that utilities are
required to abide by certain timelines during the interconnection study
process.  Generally, these timelines are in the attachment below.  Most of
the interconnection policies I have seen have timelines significantly longer
than what FERC is now requiring.  You should probably first call the utility
to ask if they are planning to revise the deadlines to comply with FERC's new
order.  If that doesn't work, you can call me.

There are several utilities that have filed their interconnection procedures
at FERC:  PJM, NEPOOL, Ameren, Entergy, ComEd.  Enron is actively protesting
Entergy's proposed procedures and interconnection agreement (a FERC order is
expected 4/26/00).  In addition, ComEd's procedures have been protested and a
FERC order is expected soon.  Other utilities may be filing their procedures
shortly.  Once you have gotten the procedures and interconnection agreements,
I am happy to review them.

An ENA attorney must sign off on the interconnection agreement.  Generally, I
review the interconnection agreement from a regulatory perspective.  It is
important to have someone in Genco review it if Enron will own or operate it
after in-service or if EPMI plans to purchase power from the plant.  The
interconnection agreement usually contains operational provisions, including
imbalance provisions, that are typically very one sided toward the utility,
so it is important to have Enron technical input before the agreement is
executed.

Asking for interconnection and getting in a queue is not a request for
transmission.  You should consult the power trading desk transmission people
in order to determine whether a request for firm or non-firm transmission
needs to be made.  The desk can make the request if necessary.  While the
desk may choose to use daily/hourly non-firm transmission for some of the
Enron plants, the decision is made on a case-by-case basis.  You do not want
your plant to be "stranded" without the ability to wheel electricity away
from the busbar, unless you are building a plant in order to sell power
directly to the interconnected utility, and even then, you may want to wheel
power around at times.

If the utility does not have enough transmission capability to wheel power
from the plant, the plant/Enron may have to pay "network upgrades."  You want
to make sure that you are reserving transmission on a firm (priority) basis
if you pay for network upgrades.  Some utilities simply provide "transmission
credits" when requiring network upgrades.  These are not as valuable to Enron
because there may be no opportunity to ever wheel the power if Enron doesn't
have a "reservation" for the transmission.  The Eastern interconnection is
prone to curtailments of transmission called "TLRs," especially in the
summer.  The Power Trading desk can assist in obtaining the transmission.

In order to sell power to the grid, the plant must apply to FERC for "Exempt
Wholesale Generator" (EWG) status and also obtain a FERC Power Marketer
license with "Market Based Rates."  These filings make the on-site generator
a "utility" for FERC purposes and subjects the "power marketer" to periodic
filings at FERC.  These generally must be filed at least 60 days before the
plant will start producing any power.  The filings take several weeks to
prepare.

Do not assume that you can sell ancillary services from the plant.  The plant
may not be able to sell ancillary services into the market.  EPMI has the
FERC authorization to sell certain ancillary services in California and
NEPOOL, but EPMI cannot, at this time, sell in other areas (absent a FERC
filing and setting up an OASIS web page).  Be aware that many utilities add
language in their interconnection agreements that allow them to "take" the
ancillary services from your plant, without compensation.

If you are dealing with an industrial that has a plant on-site, additional
issues are involved.  You can check on the Enron home page under "Sites",
"Intranet", "Government Affairs", "State Restructuring Reports" for
information on the status of retail open access in that state.  If you need
additional assistance, contact Elizabeth Linnell 33896.

Generally, the state must have retail open access in order for Enron to sell
power to a plant.  In order for an on-site plant to sell power to the grid,
it must apply to FERC for "Exempt Wholesale Generator" (EWG) status and also
obtain a FERC Power Marketer license with "Market Based Rates."  These
filings make the on-site generator a "utility" for FERC purposes and subject
the "power marketer" to periodic filings at FERC.  Because some industrials
may not want to be FERC regulated, ENA may be able to use a "Special Purpose
Vehicle" (SPV) so that ENA may own part of the generator.  There are also
options to establish a "Qualified Facility" (QF) that sells power to the
interconnected utility.  The interconnected utility may also have a program
in which it purchases excess power from the on-site plant.  Please contact
Bob Frank 33180 for help on possible regulatory structures.

There may also be issues if the plant is connecting to a lower voltage line,
such as a 69kv or 138kv.  Some utilties have filed to put these lines into
their distribution systems, rather than in the wholesale transmission system,
which may take them out of FERC jurisdiction for wheeling purposes.  We have
not fully examined this type of situation, but can if necessary.

There are other regulatory issues, such as site permitting, political
assistance, environmental permits, that must also be addressed.  The regional
regulatory people in Rick Shapiro's government affairs group can assist you.


Can you handle this please?
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 08/30/2000 03:31
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Debbie Nowak @ ENRON                           08/30/2000 02:12 PM

To: Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Arora/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hap Boyd/EWC/Enron@Enron, Shawn
Cumberland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Dobler/NA/Enron@Enron,
Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, John
Lamb/EWC/Enron@ENRON, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Messina/HOU/EES@EES, Bob Miele/EFS/EES@EES, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, MACK
SHIVELY/ENRON@Gateway, Jude Tatar/ENRON@Gateway, john.thompson@enron.com, Tim
Underdown/Stockton/TS/ECT@ECT
cc: Claudette Harvey/HOU/ECT@ect, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara
Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Petitt/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Shimira
Jackson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Katherine
Padilla/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephanie
Boothe/Houston/Eott@Eott, Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lysa
Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Julie Delahay/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect,
Karen Myer/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Judy Falcon/HOU/EES@EES, Doreen
Bowen/EFS/EES@EES, Melissa Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jan Dobernecker/HOU/EES@EES, Elisabeth Edwards/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard
Amabile/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, "Christi Smith" <christi.smith@lrinet.com>
Subject: URGENT NOTICE: Executive Impact & Influence 9/21-22 Program - FSD
Request

You will be receiving (if you haven't already) an e-mail from "Dennis"
<dennisw@fsddatasvc.com> requesting you to complete
an attached form.  His request states "Immediate Action Required".

It has come to our attention that you may not be familiar with FSD which is
the data service processing partner to Keilty Goldsmith.  They
are responsible for sending out the Team Selection Forms to all of our
participants.  I wanted to reconfirm that Dennis' e-mail attachment is your
Team Selection Form which must be completed and forwarded back to FSD for
processing by 12:00 noon, Thursday, August 31st.

To Assitant of Participant.  If your manager is out of town, please let me
know and I will get a form to you so that you can
hopefully fax it to his/her destination.  I will work with you in any way
possible to adhere to the timeline.  Thanks!

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate in contacting me.

Debbie Nowak
Executive Development
713  853.3304


Sara,
Who is working on this?
Thanks. Sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2001 05:36
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Glover                           05/30/2001 03:13 PM

To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FW: SNL Data Source contract

Cheryl,
This is the one pager subscription agreement.
sg
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2001 03:11
PM ---------------------------
From: Selena Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/30/2001 01:18 PM
To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: SNL Data Source contract

Sheila,

Attached is a contract from SNL data source to provide financial data.  Gary
has given his OK.  Can you forward this on to legal for the proper review?

Thanks a bunch,

Selena

If you have any questions please let me know.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Ellen Gulczynski (NY 206)  [mailto:EGulczynski@snl.com]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:12 PM
To: 'mike.fowler@enron.com' ; 'selena.gonzalez@enron.com'
Subject: SNL DataSource contract

Mike and Selena-

Attached is the quote for services document.  Please review it and call me
if you have questions.

Also, I've instruction our Subscriptions dept. to send the daily newletters
to Mike for the duration of your trial, however, this may take a day to kick
in.

Thanks and regards,

Ellen

 <<Enron Corp. BTFqfs.doc>>

Ellen A. Gulczynski
SNL DataSource
egulczynski@snl.com
t - 201-963-1000
f - 804-244-4608

 SNL Securities is the leading information and research company
focusing on the banking, thrift, real estate, insurance, specialized
financial services and energy industries. SNL collects financial, market,
corporate, M&A and operating data on the public and private companies in
these industries and transmits it to the sectors' top executives, investors,
securities analysts, investment bankers, ratings and regulatory agencies,
credit analysts, consultants, and attorneys.

 - Enron Corp. BTFqfs.doc


James:  Please ignore my earlier email.  I do have your email of 6/13/00 and
will respond as quickly as possible.  Thanks.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000 05:31 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	07/05/2000 03:40 PM

		 To: jcoiley@wfw.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA Agreement between Credit Agricole Indosuez and Enron North
America Corp.

James:  I just thought I'd follow up with you regarding our conversation of
June 7, 2000.  I thought that you were going to produce a new draft based
upon our discussion.  Please let me know if I misunderstood or if in fact the
ball is in my court.  Thanks.  Sara


Jeff,

Would it be possible for you to add my name to your update list.  I work with Kristin Walsh and cover competitive intelligence for power West.  Kristin is out on maternity leave I would hate to not get your report.  Thanks, Jeff.

G. Britt Whitman

britt.whitman@enron.com


I don't think we need the language, especially since the guarantees won't
apply to retrofitting the plant later.

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 02/07/2001 09:08:48 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Words to go with the other 2 emails regarding Austin

I would recommend that we not insert Eric's comments regarding the
exhaust temperature and energy guarantees for combined cycle facilities.
As Eric indicates, this is a simple cycle plant, which is similar to
Fountain Valley.  When commenting on the Fountain Valley agreement, Lee
recommended that all references to exhaust temperature and energy
guarantees be stricken and we did so.  In addition, Lee has already seen
a version of the City of Austin agreement that had Sections 10.4.1 and
10.4.3 (the sections Eric would like to reinstated) stricken. Let me
know what you think, but I recommend we leave them out, particularly if
such sections are not necessary and would only be useful to have in the
future if the plant ever went combined cycle.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 2:28 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: Words to go with the other 2 emails regarding Austin

Here's what Eric wrote:

I revised the contract you sent me to make it site specific.  Those
changes
are redlined.  Please note that I have reinserted sections 10.4.1 and
10.4.3 as well as the defined terms that go with them.  These were
related
to exhaust temperature and energy.  I know this is a simple cycle plant
and
they typically aren't required, but I wanted to see if GE would
guarantee
it anyway.  It maybe helpful in the future if Austin Energy goes
combined
cycle.  If for some reason GE's lawyers specifically want to leave that
out, then they will probably also want to delete sections 10.4.2 and
10.4.4
(and their defined terms) since those also talk about specific exhaust
guarantees.  Let me know what they decide.

Exhibit A (site basis conditions) which I also revised was not attached
to
your file.  (It's right behind the sign-off pages in my hard copy.)  I
therefor hand marked up a copy and scanned it.  It is now attached as a
separate word file.

Exhibit F is "boiler plate" and shouldn't change.  Exhibit "U" is not in
my
hard copy.  My copy only goes up to Exhibit "T."   If you get something
from GE on Exhibit "U", send it to me and I will be glad to review it.


I am chuckling as I read your message.  I hope so too.  It has been a long
time coming!  Thank you for your patience.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 1:59 PM
To: CWPfister@cps-satx.com
Subject: RE: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS

(See attached file: 2001-001ctr.doc)

Christian,
     I have included the Red-line language in the contract relating to
utilization of small business concerns.  Hopefully, the next thing I see is
2 originals which have been signed by CPS.


Enron Kids
No donation is too small!
Please contact Stephanie Truss, 5-3861, or Martha Keesler, 5-2423, to make a cash donation.  The deadline for making your cash donation is Thursday, December 6, 2001.
EWS Legal
Gordon Elementary School Adoption


Here's Brent's other paragraph.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/18/99 03:36
PM ---------------------------

Brent Hendry@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/16/99 06:32 AM
To: Sara Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Guidelines

Here is my first draft.


Will the attached resume work for the bio?


Clare,

I regret to inform you that I have to decline your invitation due
to prior commitments on the same days.

Vince Kaminski

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Clare Fitzgerald  [mailto:ClareF@marcusevansch.com]
Sent:	Monday, May 07, 2001 8:48 PM
To:	'vkamins@enron.com'
Subject:	course instructor

Vince,
I am writing in regards to an energy derivatives training course I am
developing.  I would like to invite you to be an instructor for the course.
A preliminary agenda is attached.  Brett Humphreys from Risk Capital
Management is teaching on Day One, and I was wondering if you would be
interested in covering all or part of Day Two.  The topics outlined here can
be modified based on your feedback.

Our training courses are structured for an interactive, classroom-type
setting.  We limit the audience to 25 people and bring in 2-3 instructors to
cover the material over the course of two days.

I will follow up but please let me know what you think.
 <<Agenda.doc>>
Thank you,
Clare Fitzgerald
Director, Training Courses
marcus evans
312-540-3000x6785

 - Agenda.doc << File: Agenda.doc >>


Gentlemen,

Here's the notice we discussed.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/15/2000 02:12
PM ---------------------------

david.davis@ss.ps.ge.com on 06/15/2000 01:42:37 PM
To: matthew.tezyk@enron.com
cc: Frank.R.Cervenka@enron.com, james.bonnett@ss.ps.ge.com,
lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com, rafael.castaneda@ss.ps.ge.com,
gary.gross@ss.ps.ge.com, kay.mann@enron.com

Subject: Units Ready To Ship

 - Enron005-Ready To Ship.pdf


Thanks Loretta.

FYI- I was told that it was ok for me to stay here on the 19th. So unless anyone else has been assigned this work space I should be ok?
Please advise.

Regards,
Pravas
X52419

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brelsford, Loretta
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:47 AM
To:	Sud, Pravas
Subject:	Move to EGAS, EB 33

Pravas,

The move for this week-end has been submitted and cannot be changed.  I've talked to the head of the move group.  She is aware that you are in 1968 and will not be moving until later.  This is fine.  Next week we'll schedule your move - I'll talk to you then about what you'll be moving and where.

Thanks,
Loretta
x55541


Good Morning.  How was your night?

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Telemaque [mailto:Frank_Telemaque@flexitallic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:07 AM
To: Davis, Dana
Subject: RE: Hey

good morning dana,what up baby.

-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Dana [ <mailto:Dana.Davis@ENRON.com>]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 1:23 PM
To: frank_telemaque@flexitallic.com
Subject: Hey

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.

**********************************************************************

INSIST UPON GENUINE FLEXITALLIC GASKETS!
Anything else is just a copy.


will do.  thanks.

	Ginger Dernehl
	02/16/2001 01:38 PM

		 To: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Weekly California Call

Rick would like to hold a weekly call re: California every Friday from 4:00pm
- 5:00pm CST w/the above listed individuals.  The dial in number will be
1-800-283-1805 and the call will start on Friday, February 23.

Thanks and please mark your calendars accordingly.

gngr
713-853-7751


_/_/ RAPID BLAST _/_/

This publication is brought to you by Stockupticks.com and
StockNight.com providing all the same great content you are used
to, in a text format that allows us to reach you in just minutes
- thus maximizing your ability to read, digest, and react. This
week's profile highlights Paving Stone Corporation (OTC BB: PVNG)
a market leader in the interlocking concrete paver installation
business. The company has announced a 23% increase in revenues for
to $31.5 million for its fiscal year just ended.  PVNG is an
exciting story that is yet undiscovered by the professional
investment community.  This provides an important opportunity to
discover this company ahead of the market.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * Paving Stone Corporation (OTCBB: PVNG) * * *

-------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * Breaking News * * * *

PAVING STONE CORPORATION REPORTS 23% INCREASE IN 2001 FULL YEAR
REVENUES TO $31.5 MILLION

POMPANO BEACH, Fla., Jan. 14 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Paving
Stone Corporation (OTC Bulletin Board: PVNG), a market leader
in the interlocking concrete paver installation business
nationwide, today announced that its revenues for the 2001
fiscal year had increased by 23% to $31.5 million
compared with revenues of $25.5 million for the 2000 fiscal year.

For the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2001, revenues were
$8.9 million compared with $7.3 million in the 2000 fourth
quarter, an increase of 22%. The increased revenues were
attributed to the continued growth of the Company's core offices
in Florida, Georgia and Arizona and the successful expansion into
California, Nevada, Texas and the Carolinas.

The Company said that it expects to release its 2001 fourth
quarter and full year financial results in late March 2002.

Maurice Sigouin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Paving Stone Corporation, stated: "Paving Stone Corporation
has established a leading nationwide position in the
interlocking paving stone installation industry. The increase
in our year-end and fourth quarter revenues reflect the ongoing
implementation of our strategy to expand our national footprint
while achieving operational efficiencies."

The Company plans to continue to expand its position in the
marketplace through internal growth and the acquisition of
quality independent businesses in strategic markets. As a
premier paver installation and design company in the country,
Paving Stone Corporation believes it is poised to capture a
dominant market share in this expanding marketplace. According
to the Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute, the industry's
trade association, while the annual installations of pavers
has quadrupled in the U.S. over the last 20 years, the U.S.
market of 300 million square feet of annual installation is
still a fraction of the annual installation rate in Europe.

Mr. Sigouin continued: "We built this business on the
foundation of quality work and customer satisfaction.
Our company's growth is indicative of our thousands of
satisfied customers since 1990. Yet we realize there
are a vast number of potential customers that have yet
to learn about the cost advantages and convenience of
interlocking paving stones for commercial and residential
landscape and infrastructure applications.

"We are already expanding our national footprint and
bringing certain services in-house. By doing so, we have
the ability to generate up to three times the revenues on
a per square foot basis (as in a residential installation
in locations other than our Florida base). With this business
model, we expect to be able to substantially increase the
revenues per job, compared with jobs of similar size in our
Florida base. When one adds the components of geographic
expansion, increasing market share with large increases in
revenues on a per square foot basis, which result in higher
revenue per job, we have the potential for strong bottom line
growth."

About Paving Stone Corporation

Paving Stone Corporation enjoys the position of market leader in the
interlocking concrete paver installation business nationwide and has
received numerous industry awards for design and installation
excellence.

Established a decade ago with two employees, the Company has grown
to include 80 employees and hundreds of installation crews located
in 16 offices nationwide. In addition to eight offices throughout
Florida, Paving Stone Corporation operates in Alabama, Arizona,
California, Georgia, Nevada, Tennessee, Texas, and the Carolinas.
Additional information is available on the Company's Web site at
www.thepavingstone.com.

Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995

The information contained in this news release, other than
historical information, should be considered forward-looking
statements that are protected under the safe harbor of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Projections
and other forward-looking statements and descriptions of
management expectations regarding future events or financial
performance, although made in good faith, are inherently
uncertain and actual events or results may differ markedly
from any forward-looking statements. Risk factors that may
cause results to differ from projections include, without
limitation, loss of suppliers, loss of customers, inadequate
capital, competition, loss of key executives, declining
prices, margin pressures, lack of adequate capital, lack of
adequate labor, unforeseen marketing expenses, and other
capital market, international and economic factors.

SOURCE Paving Stone Corporation

CONTACT: stockquest@marketpathways.com

Web site: http://www.thepavingstone.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * About Paving Stone Corporation * * *

Paving Stone designs and installs driveways, walkways, industrial
and commercial streets in addition to building permanent interlocking
retaining walls can add beauty, value as well as functionality to
any landscape. From raised flower beds to building foundations to
terraced lawns, Paving Stone can strengthen structures.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

 * * * About the Industry * * *

The paving stone market began in the U.S. approximately 30 years
ago and now constitutes 300 million square feet covered this
year. The European market covers over 3 billion feet annually.
The look and longevity of paving stone make it a rapid growth
sector of the building industry. The nearest competition in the
U.S. for orders is approximately half the size of Paving Stone.
Industry profit margins are approximately 50 percent nationally.

------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLOSURE / DISCLAIMER

All statements and expressions are the sole opinions of Rapid Blast
and are subject to change without notice. This is neither an offer
or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities mentioned. We do not
represent or gaurantee the accuracy of any statements made herein.
The owners of Rapid Blast will be paid $22,500 to prepare and
disseminate this report and provide additional advertising services.
This report may contain forward looking statements relating to the
expected capabilities of the company mentioned herein. Investing in
the securities mentioned is speculative and carries a high degree of
risk. Potential investors should do their own due diligence before
investing.

---
You are currently subscribed to stocknight as: sneal@ei.enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-stocknight-306006P@lyris.stocknight.com


Jeff--I have to run to a meeting, but am hoping to catch up with you in an hour or two....I am putting together some talking points for Ken Lay for a gov meeting this Thrusday(Roland/Hull/McCallum/Engler/Johnson) and they want a brief update on what's cooking in California.  I recognize that you're crazy busy but hope you can give me a bit of guidance.

I'll call you in awhile


Want to pass on some info on India from a conversation last night with Brenda Meisner, a lawyer at Verner, Liipfert, etc. (Saw her at the NRSC quarterly dinner).  As you know, her firm represents the Government of India.  She initiated the conversation on India and our issues there, saying something to the effect that the firm has told the Indian government how important Enron is and how close Ken is to the White House.  They also told the Embassy that the issue would NOT likely come up in the Bush meeting with the PM since the Finance Minister will be in town for World Bank meetings and they assumed it would come up at that level.  I said I was not handling the issue.  She said the firm would be open to trying to work out the issue or help with same in bringing the two sides together.  Also reminded me that Sen. Dole is at the firm.  All I said on substance was that certainly India understood the importance of this issue on the foreign investment climate there.  FYI.

John