Southwest Airlines Click 'n SaveSM E-mail Update for
March 21, 2000
Please pass this great news on to your friends! To subscribe
to Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials:
*****************************************************
Coast-to-Coast Internet Only Sale extended through
March 23, 2000.  For more details, visit:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/?src=click

Check out our Weekly Click 'n Save Specials below.
  21-day advance purchase
  Travel April 11, 2000 through August 5, 2000
  Roundtrip purchase and overnight stay required
  Purchase beginning March 21 through
  March 23, 2000, midnight PST.
  Scroll down for more details!
****************************************************
at http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/?src=click

Weekly Click 'n Save Specials

** These fares are valid for travel April 11, 2000
through August 5, 2000, except for May 26 and 29, 2000.
Ticketless travel must be purchased online at
www.southwest.com by midnight Pacific Standard Time
March 23, 2000. ** Please see Other Terms and
Conditions of these fares at the end of this e-mail.

The fares listed do not include airport-assessed passenger
facility charges (PFCs) of up to $12 roundtrip. Roundtrip
purchase and overnight stay are required. Fares do not
include a federal excise tax of $2.50 that will be imposed
on each flight segment of your itinerary. A flight segment
is defined as a takeoff and a landing.

Fares shown are each way based on roundtrip purchase

Albuquerque
$56 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$62 each way to/from Las Vegas
$40 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$97 each way to/from San Francisco
$39 each way to/from Tucson

Amarillo
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$61 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$61 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$63 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$62 each way to/from San Antonio

Austin
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$36 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$58 each way to/from Jackson
$59 each way to/from Little Rock
$51 each way to/from Oklahoma City

Baltimore/Washington
$52 each way to/from Birmingham
$50 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$54 each way to/from Detroit
$54 each way to/from Indianapolis
$64 each way to/from Jacksonville
$36 each way to/from Louisville
$34 each way to/from Manchester
$61 each way to/from Orlando
$34 each way to/from Providence
$61 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Birmingham
$52 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$60 each way to/from Cleveland
$62 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$34 each way to/from Louisville
$37 each way to/from New Orleans
$44 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Boise
$63 each way to/from Oakland
$36 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$36 each way to/from Salt Lake City
$34 each way to/from Spokane

Burbank
$36 each way to/from Oakland
$44 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$36 each way to/from Sacramento
$36 each way to/from San Jose

Chicago Midway
$50 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$36 each way to/from Columbus
$36 each way to/from Detroit
$65 each way to/from Hartford
$40 each way to/from Kansas City
$54 each way to/from Long Island (Islip)
$66 each way to/from Manchester
$43 each way to/from Nashville
$50 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham
$36 each way to/from St. Louis

Cleveland
$60 each way to/from Birmingham
$59 each way to/from Kansas City
$41 each way to/from Long Island (Islip)
$64 each way to/from Omaha
$45 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham
$44 each way to/from St. Louis

Columbus
$36 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$62 each way to/from Kansas City
$42 each way to/from Louisville
$54 each way to/from Nashville
$61 each way to/from Omaha
$61 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Corpus Christi
$38 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$40 each way to/from San Antonio

Dallas Love Field
$56 each way to/from Albuquerque
$36 each way to/from Amarillo
$36 each way to/from Austin
$36 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$36 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$36 each way to/from Lubbock
$36 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$36 each way to/from Oklahoma City
$36 each way to/from Tulsa

Detroit
$54 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$36 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$40 each way to/from Indianapolis
$59 each way to/from Kansas City
$42 each way to/from Louisville
$54 each way to/from Nashville
$61 each way to/from Omaha
$42 each way to/from St. Louis

El Paso
$62 each way to/from Las Vegas
$40 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$58 each way to/from San Antonio

Ft. Lauderdale
$34 each way to/from Orlando
$50 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham

Harlingen (South Padre Island)
$38 each way to/from Houston Hobby

Hartford
$65 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$65 each way to/from Nashville
$48 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham

Houston Bush Intercontinental
$61 each way to/from Amarillo
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$48 each way to/from Lubbock
$52 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$55 each way to/from Oklahoma City
$56 each way to/from Tulsa

Houston Hobby
$61 each way to/from Amarillo
$36 each way to/from Austin
$62 each way to/from Birmingham
$38 each way to/from Corpus Christi
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$38 each way to/from Harlingen (South Padre Island)
$48 each way to/from Lubbock
$52 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$55 each way to/from Oklahoma City
$56 each way to/from Tulsa

Indianapolis
$54 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$40 each way to/from Detroit
$44 each way to/from Kansas City
$48 each way to/from Little Rock
$36 each way to/from St. Louis

Jackson
$58 each way to/from Austin
$66 each way to/from Louisville
$49 each way to/from Orlando
$62 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham

Jacksonville
$64 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$66 each way to/from Long Island (Islip)
$50 each way to/from Nashville
$42 each way to/from New Orleans
$34 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Kansas City
$40 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$59 each way to/from Cleveland
$62 each way to/from Columbus
$59 each way to/from Detroit
$44 each way to/from Indianapolis
$49 each way to/from Little Rock
$40 each way to/from Louisville
$88 each way to/from Manchester
$36 each way to/from Nashville
$36 each way to/from Oklahoma City
$34 each way to/from St. Louis
$36 each way to/from Tulsa

Las Vegas
$62 each way to/from Albuquerque
$62 each way to/from El Paso
$47 each way to/from Oakland
$61 each way to/from Portland
$36 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$47 each way to/from Sacramento
$42 each way to/from San Jose

Little Rock
$59 each way to/from Austin
$48 each way to/from Indianapolis
$49 each way to/from Kansas City
$61 each way to/from Lubbock
$57 each way to/from Oklahoma City
$61 each way to/from San Antonio
$36 each way to/from St. Louis

Long Island (Islip)
$54 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$41 each way to/from Cleveland
$66 each way to/from Jacksonville
$54 each way to/from Louisville

Los Angeles
$36 each way to/from Oakland
$44 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$36 each way to/from Sacramento
$36 each way to/from San Jose

Louisville
$36 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$34 each way to/from Birmingham
$42 each way to/from Columbus
$42 each way to/from Detroit
$66 each way to/from Jackson
$40 each way to/from Kansas City
$54 each way to/from Long Island (Islip)
$61 each way to/from New Orleans
$63 each way to/from Oklahoma City
$61 each way to/from Omaha
$45 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham
$61 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Lubbock
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$48 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$48 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$61 each way to/from Little Rock
$57 each way to/from Oklahoma City

Manchester
$34 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$66 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$88 each way to/from Kansas City

Midland/Odessa
$40 each way to/from Albuquerque
$63 each way to/from Amarillo
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$40 each way to/from El Paso
$52 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$52 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$57 each way to/from Oklahoma City
$57 each way to/from Tulsa

Nashville
$43 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$54 each way to/from Columbus
$54 each way to/from Detroit
$65 each way to/from Hartford
$50 each way to/from Jacksonville
$36 each way to/from Kansas City
$54 each way to/from Omaha
$57 each way to/from Orlando
$57 each way to/from Tampa Bay

New Orleans
$37 each way to/from Birmingham
$42 each way to/from Jacksonville
$61 each way to/from Louisville
$44 each way to/from Orlando
$62 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham
$63 each way to/from Tulsa

Oakland
$63 each way to/from Boise
$36 each way to/from Burbank
$47 each way to/from Las Vegas
$36 each way to/from Los Angeles
$44 each way to/from Portland
$34 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$46 each way to/from Seattle
$53 each way to/from Spokane
$63 each way to/from Tucson

Oklahoma City
$51 each way to/from Austin
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$55 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$55 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$36 each way to/from Kansas City
$57 each way to/from Little Rock
$63 each way to/from Louisville
$57 each way to/from Lubbock
$57 each way to/from Midland/Odessa

Omaha
$64 each way to/from Cleveland
$61 each way to/from Columbus
$61 each way to/from Detroit
$61 each way to/from Louisville
$54 each way to/from Nashville

Ontario
$34 each way to/from Phoenix
$49 each way to/from Salt Lake City
$40 each way to/from Tucson

Orlando
$61 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$34 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale
$49 each way to/from Jackson
$57 each way to/from Nashville
$44 each way to/from New Orleans

Phoenix
$34 each way to/from Ontario
$61 each way to/from Sacramento
$34 each way to/from San Diego
$59 each way to/from San Francisco
$55 each way to/from San Jose

Portland
$61 each way to/from Las Vegas
$44 each way to/from Oakland
$42 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$44 each way to/from Sacramento
$44 each way to/from San Jose

Providence
$34 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington

Raleigh-Durham
$50 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$45 each way to/from Cleveland
$50 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale
$48 each way to/from Hartford
$62 each way to/from Jackson
$45 each way to/from Louisville
$62 each way to/from New Orleans
$41 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Reno/Lake Tahoe
$36 each way to/from Boise
$44 each way to/from Burbank
$36 each way to/from Las Vegas
$44 each way to/from Los Angeles
$34 each way to/from Oakland
$42 each way to/from Portland
$34 each way to/from San Jose
$46 each way to/from Seattle
$51 each way to/from Spokane
$57 each way to/from Tucson

Sacramento
$36 each way to/from Burbank
$47 each way to/from Las Vegas
$36 each way to/from Los Angeles
$61 each way to/from Phoenix
$44 each way to/from Portland
$48 each way to/from Salt Lake City
$40 each way to/from San Diego

Salt Lake City
$36 each way to/from Boise
$49 each way to/from Ontario
$48 each way to/from Sacramento
$55 each way to/from Seattle
$48 each way to/from Spokane

San Antonio
$62 each way to/from Amarillo
$40 each way to/from Corpus Christi
$58 each way to/from El Paso
$61 each way to/from Little Rock
$61 each way to/from Tulsa

San Diego
$34 each way to/from Phoenix
$40 each way to/from Sacramento
$40 each way to/from San Francisco
$40 each way to/from San Jose

San Francisco
$97 each way to/from Albuquerque
$59 each way to/from Phoenix
$40 each way to/from San Diego

San Jose
$36 each way to/from Burbank
$42 each way to/from Las Vegas
$36 each way to/from Los Angeles
$55 each way to/from Phoenix
$44 each way to/from Portland
$34 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$40 each way to/from San Diego

Seattle
$46 each way to/from Oakland
$46 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$55 each way to/from Salt Lake City

Spokane
$34 each way to/from Boise
$53 each way to/from Oakland
$51 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe
$48 each way to/from Salt Lake City

St. Louis
$36 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$44 each way to/from Cleveland
$42 each way to/from Detroit
$36 each way to/from Indianapolis
$34 each way to/from Kansas City
$36 each way to/from Little Rock

Tampa Bay
$61 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$44 each way to/from Birmingham
$61 each way to/from Columbus
$34 each way to/from Jacksonville
$61 each way to/from Louisville
$57 each way to/from Nashville
$41 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham

Tucson
$39 each way to/from Albuquerque
$63 each way to/from Oakland
$40 each way to/from Ontario
$57 each way to/from Reno/Lake Tahoe

Tulsa
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love Field
$56 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$56 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$36 each way to/from Kansas City
$57 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$63 each way to/from New Orleans
$61 each way to/from San Antonio

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials
Other Terms and Conditions:

Tickets must be purchased through the Southwest Airlines
web site at http://www.southwest.com/ The fares listed
above are per person for each way of travel. Click 'n Save
Internet Specials require roundtrip travel and an overnight
stay. Fares listed are for general information only and
are not a reflection of current seat availability. Travel
may originate in either direction. Roundtrip travel must
be between the same origin airport and the same destination
airport.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials are nonchangeable and
nonrefundable. Ticketless Travel Online may only be
purchased with a credit card. Customers holding funds from
a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials may not be combined with
any other fares. Seats are limited and won't be available
on some flights that operate during very busy travel times
and holiday periods. Any change to the reservation (flights,
dates, cities, and/or names of passengers) once purchased
will result in a fare increase. Standby travel requires an
upgrade to the full unrestricted fare.

Of course, if your favorite city is not listed, we have many
other incredible fares to all Southwest cities. To find more
great fares on Southwest Airlines, please visit Ticketless
Travel Online or check our Fares Information online at
http://www.southwest.com/.

************************************************************
Need a vacation???  Visit Southwest Airlines Vacations at:
http://www.swavacations.com/index1.htm  and book your
vacation online!  Don't forget to check out the Thrilling
Thursdays Weekly Specials for the hot deals of the week!
************************************************************

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2000 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers1 as: [sshackl@ect.enron.com]
To unsubscribe, send email to
leave-special-offers1-97904730L@mail.southwest.com
or unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email


fyi...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 05/25/2001
01:18 PM ---------------------------

Sandra Yamane <SYamane@marathon-com.com> on 05/25/2001 12:29:57 PM
To: "'karen.denne@enron.com'" <karen.denne@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Lockyer comes out swinging at oilman - Davis has plenty of compan y
in depths of

 <<Lockyer comes out swinging at oilman - Davis has plenty of company in
depths of poll.htm>>
Karen: Don't know if this was included in today's clips.
See reference to Lockyer comment.

 - Lockyer comes out swinging at oilman - Davis has plenty of company in
depths of poll.htm


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude48.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas48.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil48.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded48.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG48.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG48.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL48.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Anything that appears on the Genco DPR has already been recognized.  The
amount in prudency is not a future reserve but the actual amount of prudency
dollars that have been released into p&l.  Jenny.


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 09/17/2000 09:41 AM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	08/05/2000 03:41 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Arbitration Provisions for review

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 08/05/2000 03:40 PM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	06/26/2000 04:09 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Arbitration Provisions for review

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000 04:08 PM -----

	Gil Melman@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	04/27/2000 03:01 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Arbitration Provisions for review

Richard--we are so desperate for your expertise in the EBS hinterlands........
----- Forwarded by Gil Melman/Enron Communications on 04/27/00 03:01 PM -----

	Gil Melman
	04/12/00 09:42 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Kristina Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Arbitration Provisions for review

You will love me after this request........

Richard, we have several form contracts being developed and used in EBS that
include arbitration provisions.  We thought it might be useful to get your
thoughts on our current forms to make sure we are consistent with up to date
arbitration provisions.  Attached are three of our forms for your review.
Please note that the Professional Services Agreement is a standard consulting
agreement that we typically use with service providers.  Please call me with
any questions or comments.


<http://images.commissioner.com/images/spln_fantasy_hdr_600.gif>Fantasy Football Newsletter
October 19, 2001

      <http://cbs.sportsline.com/images/newsletter/magnify.jpg>Fantasy Sports <http://fantasy.sportsline.com>     <http://cbs.sportsline.com/images/newsletter/magnify.jpg>Fantasy Football <http://football0.commissioner.com/mp/pro-home?league=zero>     <http://cbs.sportsline.com/images/newsletter/magnify.jpg>CBS SportsLine.com <http://cbs.sportsline.com>

Welcome to another edition of the 2001 Fantasy Football Newsletter!

The Fantasy Football newsletter will arrive in your e-mail inbox at the end of every week. We'll include news about the web site; tips on using all the features available; and answers to your player-related questions from the "Gridiron Guru."

  <http://cbs.sportsline.com/images/newsletter/pixel.jpg>	Inside

* Fantasy Football Matchups

* Customize Reports to Display the Info You Want

* Gridiron Guru

* Tip of the Week

 <http://cbs.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffpn1019v.cgi>	  <http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/217/sffpn1019e.cgi>	  <http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/224/sffpn1019s.cgi>
  _____

Fantasy Football Matchups

Every Friday our Fantasy experts break down the key Fantasy matchup of the week. It may be a top running back facing a sturdy run defender; a deep-threat wideout matched up with a premier cover-corner; or a gunslinging QB against a defense with ball-hawking safeties. We'll tell you who has the edge. We'll also highlight the key matchups in every NFL game to help you decide who to start and who to bench. Check our Fantasy News area (click News, Fantasy News on the toolbar) Fridays for Fantasy Football Matchups.

  _____

Customize Reports to Display the Info You Want

Did you know you can customize the settings of most reports on the site, and save those settings so they are displayed each time you visit the report? For example, suppose you'd like the Transactions, View report to display only Add/Drops over the past 7 days for all teams. Enter those settings, click GO and then click the Save icon displayed over the report. Now each time you click Transactions, View on the toolbar, the report is displayed according to your custom settings. After you click Save you can click the E-Rept icon to have your new custom report e-mailed to you on the days you choose.

  _____

Gridiron Guru

Welcome to Gridiron Guru, where we'll answer your questions about players and offer Fantasy Football roster advice. We invite you to send your own scouting reports and comments on players to: gridguru@commissioner.com <mailto:gridguru@commissioner.com>. You'll get the chance to be heard by thousands of Fantasy players just like yourself!

Question - Matt Biggins, Los Angeles, CA

Which two receivers should I start this weekend, out of Todd Pinkston, Bill Schroeder, Chris Carter, Terry Glenn and James McKnight? Who would you recommend starting out of Duce Staley, Stephen Davis, Ron Dayne, Kevan Barlow and Jason Brookins?

Answer - GG

As long as Schroeder (ankle) is healthy, he's a must- start against a Minnesota defense that allowed Charlie Batch to throw for 345 yards and three touchdowns last weekend. Miami has a bye, so McKnight is obviously not an option. Pinkston and Glenn both have good matchups, but we'd have to go with Carter in this case. This season has been very unpredictable, so going with your most established player in this case is the best move. To answer your second question, we'd recommend Davis against a vulnerable Carolina defense and Dayne against Philadelphia. It's tough to choose Davis, but Barlow has a bye and both Staley and Brookins will be splitting carries at best, so our hands are tied.

Question - Jeff Smith, Tampa, FL

I have Jeff Garcia, who has a bye this week. I have the option of starting Jim Miller or picking up Chris Weinke. What do you recommend?

Answer - GG

Miller has been very inconsistent from a Fantasy perspective, so we'd have to side with Weinke. He'll be facing a Washington defense decimated by injuries and vulnerable to players like Muhsin Muhammad, Donald Hayes and Wesley Walls. Weinke could have a big game.

Question - Scott Buzby, Newark, DE

Who should I start this week: Shannon Sharpe or Bubba Franks? Also, is it time to drop James Thrash? Kevin Johnson, Laveranues Coles, Todd Pinkston and Joe Jurevicius are all still available.

Answer - GG

Franks has been Brett Favre's favorite target in the red zone, but Sharpe is one of the best tight ends in the league. Sharpe will always give you good production from the tight end spot, and we highly doubt that Franks will be able to continue to score touchdowns at his current pace of one per game. As far as Thrash goes, we feel he's just not good enough to be facing No.1 cornerbacks on a weekly basis, so his numbers will be inconsistent at best. Your best bet is to drop him and go after another No. 1-caliber wideout like Johnson, who could emerge as a reliable Fantasy player.

  _____

Tip of the Week

Phil Brown, St. Louis, MO: When will people start giving Priest Holmes the credit he deserves? He is the best offensive option the Chiefs have, and he even has more rushing yards than Marshall Faulk after five weeks. With Dick Vermeil calling the shots in Kansas City, Holmes will continue to be a productive player all season.

This message has been provided free of charge and free of obligation. If you prefer not to receive emails of this nature please send an email to remove@commissioner.com <mailto:remove@commissioner.com>. Do not respond to this email directly.


Lorraine, see the attached.  I added "Maximum" and "Minimum" to the chart but
don't know whether I got it backwards...anyway, let's talk if you have any
questions.


Jeff -- Please see attached.  Any comments or suggestions.  -- David


Is Dayton showing the price to be
 1.  $2.47 and $2.455

 2.  $2.47 +.17 and $2.455 + .17?

To me it looks like options 2.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Steve Gillespie @ ENRON                           03/22/2000 03:46 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Dayton P&L - 0002 Production - Sales

Chris,

I have this information for you.  It will be on your desk as you read this
message.

sg
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron on 03/22/2000
03:45 PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany@ECT
03/21/2000 04:54 PM
To: Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff A Crook/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Dayton P&L - 0002 Production - Sales

Steve will find out what the pricing is and will let me know.

	From:  Dana Daigle @ ENRON                           03/21/2000 11:58 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff A Crook/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Dayton P&L - 0002 Production - Sales

---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron on 03/21/2000
11:58 AM ---------------------------

Jeff A Crook@ECT
03/21/2000 10:17 AM
To: Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Dayton P&L - 0002 Production - Sales

Any updates?

Thanks,
Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff A Crook/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000 10:16
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Dana Daigle @ ENRON                           03/20/2000 07:26 AM

To: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff A Crook/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Dayton P&L - 0002 Production - Sales

---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron on 03/20/2000
07:26 AM ---------------------------

Jeff A Crook@ECT
03/17/2000 06:34 AM
To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Dayton P&L - 0002 Production - Sales

Under contract 96029523, deal 145321, ENA billed at rate of IF.CGAS.APPAL-MI
= $2.76.  The rate customer is showing is tiered as follows: 145,000 mmbtu @
$2.47 and 145,000 mmbtu @ $2.455.  Please verify if volumes should be at
tiered pricing.

Thank you,
Jeff


Done.

DG

From: Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/28/2001 09:56 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deal # QZ2119

Please rebook to W&T Offshore, Inc. short name is W&TOFFSHORE.

Thanks

Lesli


<http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>	  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_TL.jpg>	  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>	  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_TR.jpg>
	  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/ia_banner02.gif>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_BL.jpg>		  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_BR.jpg>

  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>	 <http://secure.scientech.com/specialpages/Multi_Client.asp>

  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>	  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>
	  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/will100border_copy.jpg>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_TL.jpg>		  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_TR.jpg>
	  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif> <http://www.thestructuregroup.com>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif> <http://secure.scientech.com/specialpages/Strategic_Planning.asp>   <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif> <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/details.asp?ProductID=909>   <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_BL.jpg>		  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_BR.jpg>

November 19, 2001

Montana Power:
Problems Continue to Overshadow Transformation Into Touch America

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[News item from CBS MarketWatch] Montana Power shares fell on Nov. 16, a day after the utility posted a loss for its third quarter, citing the slowdown in the economy and the company's transition from a diversified energy company to a stand-alone telecommunications firm. The stock fell to a 52-week low of $4.05 earlier in the session. It closed Nov. 16 at $4.18, down 52 cents. As of early morning trading on Nov. 19, Montana Power shares remained at $4.18.

Analysis: There is little doubt that Montana Power currently finds itself at a challenging crossroads. The company remains in the midst of becoming solely a telecommunications operation, having sold off much of its utility holdings. However, the process has hit several snags, including an incomplete transfer of its transmission and distribution unit to Northwestern Corp. Compounding Montana Power's current problems is a weakened financial performance, which continues to worsen and also leaves little capital to build the telecom business. In addition, the company faces a host of related challenges, including uncertainty about the final regulatory approval needed for the asset sale to Northwestern, requests for rate increases to fund the purchase of power that Montana Power must buy on the wholesale market, and inspection of the long-term power-purchase contracts that the company has formed with various suppliers. The question that investors should be asking with regard to Montana Power's current plight is whether or not the financial losses and resulting drop in stock price represent a temporary setback or some larger indication of doubt about the company's viability as a telecom operation.

For its third quarter 2001, Montana Power posted a loss of $27.5 million, or 26 cents a share, representing a $57.3-million swing from its 3Q 2000 profit of $30.4 million, or 29 cents a share. During the third quarter of 2000, Montana Power had reported a net income of $31.3 million. Montana Power has noted that the losses in the current quarter were not solely related to Touch America, but also included a $14.8-million pre-tax write-down of investments in two other telecommunications companies. One had filed for bankruptcy and the other defaulted on loans that Montana Power had helped guarantee. In addition, company officials have attributed the loss to price decreases and the slowing economy. However, note that the current third-quarter losses followed losses in the second quarter as well. Specifically, the company reported a net loss of $10.9 million, or 11 cents a share, in the 2Q 2001, compared with net income of $35.5 million, or 34 cents a share, in the second quarter of 2000. The company also previously reduced its expectations of revenue growth in 2001 to 10 percent from 25 percent. According to Montana Power's CEO Bob Gannon, the company is merely experiencing a "short-term liquidity problem."

Nevertheless, to say that Montana Power is having some growing pains is an understatement. Since March 2000, it has been Montana Power's goal to totally divest all of its energy assets and re-emerge as a debt-free communications company, operating under the name of Touch America (presently the company's telecom subsidiary), with zero debt, $350 million in cash and 26,000 miles of fiber communications lines. CEO Gannon originally envisioned, and continues to see, Touch America as one of the largest broadband companies in the country and a more lucrative business model than the formerly integrated Montana Power. Much of the transition has already taken place, considering that Montana Power has successfully divested its oil and gas, coal and independent power production businesses. As noted, the last piece of the puzzle is the sale of its electric and natural-gas utility operations to Northwestern Corp., a provider of electricity, natural-gas and communications services to Midwestern customers. This is a big piece of the puzzle, however, as Touch America is counting on proceeds from the distribution sale to support continued growth.

Therein lies one of the main challenges for Montana Power. The Montana Public Service Commission is the last regulatory agency that needs to approve the sale of these assets. Some analysts have suggested that Montana Power's financial problems can be resolved only if the Montana Public Service Commission approves the sale of the electric and natural-gas distribution systems, which could inject some $460 million in Touch America's operations. Yet, state regulators are ensuring that the state consumer counsel's office, which represents ratepayers in utility cases, and a group of large industrial electricity users also have an opportunity to raise any concerns about the proposed sale of the assets. The less time provided for equal-opportunity review and comment could increase the likelihood that the sale could be challenged down the line.

After some early deliberation, the Montana Public Service Commission has now agreed to review the $1.1-billion proposed sale of the assets to Northwestern Corp. by Jan. 31, 2002, although lawyers for Montana Power are still lobbying to have this review moved up to December. Part of the pressure for the review, the company's attorneys have argued, is that if the sale is not approved by the end of the year, investors and lenders may lose patience regarding the uncertainty of the deal and refuse to provide any further capital support into the growing Touch America. Furthermore, the viability of the entire business plan for Touch America could be brought into question if this asset sale is not approved by state regulators, considering that Montana Power is counting on proceeds from the sale to support growth of the new telecom company. The sales agreement between Montana Power and Northwestern Corp. expires March 31, 2002, so time is also a factor.

Another issue that has yet to be resolved is Montana Power's intent to raise rates to support purchases of wholesale power. In other words, as a tangential issue related to the sale of its assets, state regulators also question how Montana Power will recover certain power-supply costs as it continues to morph into a telecom business. The company has established that it expects to pay nearly $2 billion over the next 30 years for wholesale power purchases that have been necessitated by its transition to a telecom company from a utility holding company, and hopes to increase electric rates by 20 percent to support these expenses. Montana Power is still considered the default provider to about 288,000 customers, and needs an average of 670 MW for its customers. However, the company also needs to keep a total of 1,050 MW as a peak load during the winter months and aims to keep 100 MW of reserve power.

Since the company voluntarily divested its own generation facilities to PPL Corp., it must procure its entire load on the open market at rates set by the Montana Public Service Commission. The 20-percent rate increase reportedly would increase residential electricity rates by about $2.00 a month starting in July 2002, making the average bill about $64 per month. In addition to the projected 20-percent increase for residential customers, Montana Power estimated that small businesses could see their rates increase by 21 percent and medium industrial customers could see a 36-percent increase. It is important to note that a recent survey by the Great Falls Tribune concluded that, the increase in Montana Power's rates would produce some of the highest residential electric rates in the Northwest.

Montana Power is attempting to establish long-term power contracts with suppliers to meet its entire load requirements. For instance, Montana Power formed a buy-back agreement with PPL as a condition of the generation sale two years ago. This contract expires July 1, 2002. Beyond that date, Montana Power announced that it signed a one-year contract to buy 111 MW from Duke Energy at an undisclosed price. PPL also has formed a new contract to provide 450 MW to Montana Power over a five-year period after its current contract expires. Northwestern Power, the purchaser of Montana Power's distribution system, has said that it wants Montana Power to assemble a diverse package of power-purchase deals (instead of buying all its load from one source) to encourage the development of new generation sources in the region. Montana Power has reportedly submitted a portfolio of power-purchase deals to the Montana Public Service Commission to determine the inclusion of those deals within the rate structure, and the portfolio contains about three-fourths of the 1,129 MW that Montana Power will need to cover its peak demand of customers and maintain an adequate reserve. The company will probably purchase the balance of its requirements on the short-term market.

Also, on the legal front, Montana Power continues to navigate through at least two litigious proceedings. First, in August, a group of Montana Power shareholders initiated a lawsuit against the utility, claiming the company's effort to get out of the electricity business was illegal and cost them $3 billion in lost stock value. The complaint, filed in the District Court at Butte, said the sale of Montana Power generation plants to PPL Montana in December 1999 was done without the required shareholder approval and should be overturned. The suit also asks for a court order putting the plants and an estimated $100 million in profits realized by PPL from operating the plants into a trust until the case is resolved. What this means is that the sale of Montana Power's generation assets are in a state of litigation, even though the sale of the generation assets was completed two years ago. Another lawsuit is related to Montana Power's $200-million purchase last year of Qwest Communications' long-distance and other telephone businesses within a 14-state service area. Essentially, Montana Power has launched a suit against Qwest, alleging that Qwest has violated anti-trust laws and constrained competition in the long-distance and voice and data market.

Consequently, as Montana Power closes out the year and hits the two-year mark in its transformation into Touch America, the future for the company looks rather questionable. Although there are market doubts about the future of the telecom sector, Montana Power remains confident that its long-term prospects as a telecom company remain very strong. Nevertheless, the current question for investors is how quickly and how successfully Montana can complete its transformation into Touch America. In other words, what Montana Power sees on the horizon may not be so easily reached. The path to the company's final destination is obviously marked by several financial and legal obstacles.

An archive list of previous IssueAlert articles is available at
www.scientech.com <http://secure.scientech.com/issuealert/>

  _____

We encourage our readers to contact us with their comments. We look forward to hearing from you. Nancy Spring  <mailto:nspring@scientech.com>

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Jane Pelz  <mailto:jpelz@scientech.com>at 505.244.7650. Advertising opportunities are also available on our Website.

  _____

Our staff is comprised of leading energy experts with diverse backgrounds in utility generation, transmission and distribution, retail markets, new technologies, I/T, renewable energy, regulatory affairs, community relations and international issues. Contact consulting@scientech.com <http://consulting@scientech.com> or call Nancy Spring at 505.244.7613.

  _____

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH information products. If you would like to refer colleagues to receive our free, daily IssueAlert articles, please register directly on our site at secure.scientech.com/issuealert <http://secure.scientech.com/issuealert/>.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily e-mail, and you are currently a registered subscriber to IssueAlert via SCIENTECH's website, please visit <http://secure.scientech.com/account/> to unsubscribe. Otherwise, please send an e-mail to IssueAlert <mailto:IssueAlert@scientech.com>, with "Delete IA Subscription" in the subject line.

  _____

SCIENTECH's IssueAlert(SM) articles are compiled based on the independent analysis of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed, or to be the basis for investment decisions of any kind. SCIENTECH's sole purpose in publishing its IssueAlert articles is to offer an independent perspective regarding the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing reputation as an expert on energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights reserved.
  <http://infostore.consultrci.com/spacerdot.gif?IssueAlert=11/19/2001>


i'm not sure

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Killen, Faith
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 1:02 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	Canada Mgmt Summ change
Importance:	High

Hi John,
Are you okay with combining the Retail line and Executive line for Canada?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Patterson, Grant
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 12:07 PM
To:	Day, Misti
Cc:	Cappelletto, Nella
Subject:	2001 ENA Earnings Estimate

I am currently looking at reconciling Canada's P&L numbers for Q1 and Q2 to the ENA Earnings Estimate for Q1 & Q2 for 2001.  Could you let me know who is responsible for generating the total margin, direct & operating expenses and capital charge numbers for Canada in the ENA Earnings Estimate file?  In addition, can you please combine the Retail (Milnthorp) and Executive (Milnthorp) rows together on the Q1 and Q2 Earnings Estimate as the Retail division no longer exists in Canada?

Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Grant


In response to our comments from yesterday's form meeting, I am saving the
Industrial in my forms directory, now as #5 draft.  If you have to draft one
let me know, and we'll figure out which form to work off of.


You don't appear to have attached the list...

	"Anita Herrera" <aherrera@statoilenergy.com>
	05/04/2000 12:33 PM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Trades to be assigned

Tana - I may have sent you a spreadsheet that did not include options and
physical trades.  Attached is the complete list.  My mistake - I too have a
tendency to forget the "other" trades. - Anita


- SUNFLOWER - NNG - HOURLY - 20021.xls


http://www.consultrci.com

************************************************************************
Get a complimentary premiere SourceBook Weekly Issue at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
Not just news; analysis.
************************************************************************
Miss last week? Catch up on the latest analyses of the energy industry
at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssuesWatch
************************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, December 11, 2000
San Francisco Muni Attempt Poses Additional Challenge for PG&E
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

Backers of a plan to create a publicly owned power system in San Francisco
and Brisbane, Calif., got a financial boost recently with a panel approving
$754,250 in taxpayer money to study public power and related issues. Most
of the money will be used to study how the proposed municipality district
would work and how it would be financed. The Board of Supervisors Finance
Committee approved the spending, but put $400,000 of the money on reserve,
pending the selection of contractors to perform the study and determine
the scope of the work.

ANALYSIS: This news item circulated about two weeks ago, but it still deserves
attention as this could have tremendous impact on PG&E. The announcement
of the municipalization study comes at arguably the worst possible time
for PG&E as the utility already faces a multitude of financial and public
relations problems. Yet, in fact, the issue has been developing for several
months. Back in July, supporters of municipalization in PG&E's service
territory turned in a petition with 23,500 signatures calling for the creation
of a municipal utility district (meaning that electric service would be
provided by a city rather than an investor-owned utility).

First, let me provide some brief context regarding PG&E's current condition.
The utility is in debt of over $3 billion due to uncollected fees related
to the price spikes of last summer. PG&E's objective is to bill its customers
for this debt, and toward that end has petitioned to raise its rates with
the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).  Under PG&E's plan,
average residential monthly bills reportedly would increase from about
$54.50 to $63.50 on Jan. 1. Naturally, consumer activist groups such as
TURN that carefully monitor PG&E's every move have contested the rate
increase,
arguing that the utility alone is responsible for the debt it currently
faces. Since it is uncertain if the CPUC will grant PG&E's petition,
speculation
that the utility will become financially insolvent has begun to grow.

Both San Francisco and the smaller city of Brisbane to the south are included
in the study because municipalization must include two separate cities
in order to take effect. If municipalization is ultimately approved, these
two cities would form a new district and elect directors who would then
attempt to purchase PG&E's power grid in the area.

Proponents of the muni bypass effort say that the cities can provide less
expensive power to customers than PG&E, as the utility must pay dividends
to stockholders and compensate well-paid executives. PG&E has already started
damage control in response to the study, arguing against the formation
of a municipal utilities district. First, the utility has said simply that
it is not for sale, but more importantly it is PG&E's contention that
customers
would not necessarily save money if the cities in question were to
municipalize
their electric districts. In addition, PG&E says the cost for the cities
to buy its assets*necessary power plants, utility lines and other
infrastructure*would
run about $1 billion, which in fact would make the project more expensive
in the long run for customers.

Consumer activist Harvey Rosenfield is spearheading the municipalization
effort and is using the problems in San Diego as a means to support his
case. His name may sound familiar, as Rosenfield has been involved in many
seemingly anti-investor owned utility (IOU) measures in California. Back
in 1998, Rosenfield led the fight for Proposition 9, which would have
essentially
put a screeching halt on deregulation in the state. Although Prop. 9 was
ultimately defeated at the ballot, had it passed the measure would have
stopped the three California IOUs from charging customers for the costs
associated with $6 billion in bonds they had sold to pay for the 10-percent
rate cut that customers began receiving in January 1998. Prop. 9 would
have blocked the utilities from recouping any of their stranded costs,
which of course SDG&E has now accomplished and reportedly the other IOUs
(SCE and PG&E) are close to doing so as well. Rosenfield was a key participant
in Californians Against Utility Taxes (CUT), which lobbied repeatedly for
electric rates to be reduced by 20 percent for small consumers (as opposed
to the 10 percent that was included in the state's restructuring bill).

Along with this study related to specific cities, there reportedly is a
simultaneous movement from Governor Gray Davis for a state takeover of
the power transmission grid, power plants and government-sponsored
construction
of new generating plants. In early December, an internal memo was leaked
indicating that the governor was considering these measures as a response
to the tight supplies and high prices seen in San Diego last summer. Included
in the plan would be a restructuring of the state's power system wherein
the grid of transmission lines and power plants would be placed under state
control. Among several points on which PG&E and the governor disagree,
Davis has proposed an extended rate freeze for customers of all of the
three state's IOUs. While PG&E is pushing for a rate increase, California's
highest official reportedly would implement an indefinite rate freeze that
would further complicate PG&E's plan to pull itself out of debt.

Municipalization attempts in cities across the United States have increased
over the last two decades. Just last week, the city of Hermiston, Ore.,
was granted the right to acquire, by condemnation, the distribution facilities
that Pacific Power uses to serve parts of the municipality. The Umatilla
County Circuit Court has upheld the city of Hermiston's right to acquire,
by condemnation, the distribution facilities Pacific Power uses to serve
parts of the municipality. The city has been trying to acquire those
facilities
since 1998, with the intent of forming its own utility to serve the 4,000
commercial and residential customers now served by Pacific Power. Of course,
even though this is a significant ruling, it will remain embroiled in court
for some time. A jury trial to set the dollar amount of compensation for
Pacific Power's facilities won't start until March 12, 2001. Other
well-publicized
municipalization attempts have taken place in Lakewood, N.Y. (failed) and
a number of cities across Florida.

However, despite the rise in muni bypass efforts, the fact remains that
no contested municipalization effort of any significant size has been
successful
since the one that occurred in Massena, N.Y. back in 1982. At that time,
the city of Massena offered low-cost hydropower and tax-free financing,
which made the municipalization attempt beneficial to citizens. Today,
cities rarely can offer such advantages, which had made it difficult for
muni bypass efforts to succeed. Statistics show that, when given the option
to develop a city-run electric system by dissolving the incumbent utility's
authority, citizens across the country have chosen to retain the IOU model.
Of course, arguments could be made that in such cases the IOU lobbying
force has been a formidable component, wielding the capital necessary to
wage a successful campaign to protect its business. Yet, at the same time,
a case can be made that the benefits of municipalization just have not
been proven and that explains why citizens generally have opted to retain
the IOU model.

There is both good and bad news for PG&E related to this particular study.
The bad news is that studies such as these most often recommend
municipalization,
which makes it very difficult for local politicians to resist a takeover.
In other words, because the wheels have started turning toward
municipalization
in the area, it is more than likely that PG&E will have to engage in a
battle to preserve its business. Even though past history shows the attempt
probably would not be successful if PG&E contests it, the bypass effort
would result in PG&E spending a lot of money and time to fight the effort.

The good news is that time is on the utility's side. Municipalization is
usually a long and involved process. The fact that the Finance Committee
gave the green light to proceed with the study is only the first in many
regulatory checkpoints. The next steps are the full board's consideration
of the funding request for the study, and subsequently a decision whether
or not to put municipalization on the local ballot. Then the hard campaigning
would begin to sway public opinion one way or the other. Thus, even if
muncipalization of the two cities were to occur, PG&E still has some time
to potentially resolve its debt situation and construct a strong opposition
to the muni attempt.

However, from a public relations standpoint, this is just the last thing
that PG&E needs at this point. The utility continues to spin media coverage
to convey that it is only trying to recoup a debt that it accrued on behalf
of its obligation to serve customers. Adversaries such as TURN and Harvey
Rosenfield, however, are just as aggressively working to convince the public
that PG&E is trying to unfairly stick customers with a $3 billion tab.
To now have discussions emerge about whether or not city government could
more effectively provide electric service is another fire that PG&E will
have to extinguish if it wants to remain operational.
===============================================================
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert and SourceBook Weekly should
be sent to wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

*********************************************************************
Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
at nspring@scientech.com or (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are
also available on our website.
*********************************************************************

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and type "delete" in the subject line.


The Meeting have been moved to EB2831


Oversight.  No other reason.  Thanks for noticing and letting me know.

Best,
Jeff

	James D Steffes
	05/21/2001 04:03 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: More Info: PG&E to Announce Open Season on Redwood and Baja
Early Next Week

Jeff -

Why don't you send this also to Phillip Allen?

Jim

From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/18/2001 12:24 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Stephanie Miller/Enron@EnronXGate, Barry Tycholiz/Enron@EnronXGate, Chris
H Foster/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeffery Fawcett/Enron@EnronXGate, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James
D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Julie A
Gomez/Enron@EnronXGate, Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT,
David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Samuel Wehn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Christopher F Calger/Enron@EnronXGate, Tim
Belden/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert Badeer/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul
Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: More Info: PG&E to Announce Open Season on Redwood and Baja Early
Next Week

PG&E will announce via press release very early next week an open season on
Redwood, Baja and Silverado.
It comes in direct response to recent announcements of expansions into
California by pipelines.
The bid protocols will be structured similar to original open season from the
original Gas Accord.
The open season will start on June 1 and end on July 31.
Capacity will be available starting 1.1.03.
Bidders will be able to bid up to 30 years (PG&E states that that's what
generators want).
Accompanying the announcement will be another announcement that PG&E will
expand Redwood by 200mmcf/day, which they hope to have available by 1.1.03,
or some time during Q103.
About 2-4 weeks after the open season begins, PG&E will file its proposed
"Gas Accord II,"  (the first one expires end of 02).
As part of that filing, PG&E will offer its proposed ratemaking treatment for
the next five years (beginning 1.1.03).
PG&E will not include in the open season 1) core capacity and 2) certain EAD
contracts that extend beyond the Gas Accord 1 end date.
In addition, PG&E will hold back an additional 20% (after excluding core and
EAD), to be "open-seasoned" at some "future" date.
The capacity to be auctioned is: 1) 900 mmcf/day on Redwood, 2) 245 (annual)
on Baja, plus an additional 200/day in summer on Baja, 3) 155 on Silverado.
How PG&E will market the 20% they intend to hold back, and when they might
auction it off in the future will be discussed in PG&E's Gas Accord II filing.
No single company will be awarded more than 30% of the capacity on any
specific path in the primary open season (though firms can bid whatever level
of capacity they choose).

Please forwad along to anyone else who might be interested.  If you have any
questions, just holler.

Best,
Jeff


Attached please find an updated power credit watchlist dated 12/11/00.
Please direct any comments/questions to the credit hotline, (713) 853-1803

Veronica Gonzalez


remember the Hydrocarbon lease GTC?  I need another one for :

Niemerg Gas Company
808 East Jefferson Avenue
Effingham, Il 62401
state of incorporation:Illinois
phone:217-342-4036
fax:217-235-0743
Tax Id 37-1390807

contact :Brent Holmes
Heller, Holmes & Associates, P.C.
A Professional Corporation
110 Broadway
P.O. Box 889
Matoon, Illinois 61938-0889
217-235-2700
fax: 217-235-0748

Sept 20-30,2000
NGPL meter 903152
pricing will be Gas Daily/daily indx NGPL Iowa/Illinois less $.03

I will confirm pricing before the contract goes out!!


did I tell you about our trip to Mexico a month ago.... we did some cenote
dives(cave dives).... it was awesome!!!!!


Tory,
?
Just wanted to send you confirmation on what you and I agreed  to on
Thursday, October 19, 2000.
?
Regarding the months of December 2000 and January 2001,  Southwest Gas has
exercised its trigger and fixed the price for the referenced  months for the
following deal:
?
Exhibit #00-2-SO-NV,?basis of (.44), purchased on  08/31/2000.? The fixed
price will be as listed; 1) December - $4.74, and 2)  January - $4.74.? The
volume is for 15,000 Dthd to be delivered into EPNG  at the San Juan basin
(non-Bondad).
?
If the above information does not meet with your  understanding, please give
me a call.
?
Thanks for your cooperation,
?
Bill?


I want to remain a member

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Energy News Live Daily Update Confirmation from Lyris ListManager" <lyris-confirm-28888J@estutenws11.energy.williams.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Energy+20News+20Live+20Daily+20Update+20Confirmation+20from+20Lyris+20ListManager+22+20+3Clyris-confirm-28888J+40estutenws11+2Eenergy+2Ewilliams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:39 PM
To:	Weldon, V. Charles
Subject:	Your confirmation is needed

Please reply to this email message to confirm your subscription to
enl-dailyupdate-txt.

Your email address has been entered for a subscription to the
enl-dailyupdate-txt mailing list. However, your new subscription requires
a confirmation that you received this email message and want
to join this mailing list.

If you do not want to join, do nothing.  You will be automatically
removed.

To confirm that you do want to join, simply reply to this message.
Make sure that your message is addressed to
lyris-confirm-28888J@estutenws11.energy.williams.com

To unsubscribe immediately, you send an email message to
leave-enl-dailyupdate-txt-28888J@estutenws11.energy.williams.com


Hi,

Welcome back, I trust you had a good vacation.Nothing much going on here,
just huge price moves.

Anyway, everything we well, for the most part.  As far as Alliance gas is
concerned, the only new information is that the Aux Sable commissioning
process will not start until Wednesday (last estimate) per Anne Buschal.  So
make sure to mention to Hunter on Monday, as everyone else should already
know about it.  Anne's number is 403-517-6270.  She will be calling each
Morning.

My logon and password is: pmims and louise8mom.  Please look at the Nigas
Troy Grove Sheet that I have on my computer.

My position should be around 15 long, just enough to cover rolloff for 2
days.  If its not, please buy/sell to get me close to that number (or
whatever is best depending on which way the market is going).

P.S. I'm selling to Clark Refining at the Illini Point, 4,000/day @ Sitara #
436296.  He wants us to keep them on until he calls to tell us otherwise.
His number is 314-854-9644 Dteve Brown.

I'll be back on Wednesday.


Ed:  I subsequently learned that you had previously prepared credit.  Please
ignore my voice mail.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000
10:11 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Clayton Seigle                           10/10/2000 10:03 AM

To: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert Johnston/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Mideast Crisis


Can we talk today. Call me at 713-853-5587. If I am not in set a time with my asst.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robert Nelson <jrnels@sunvalley.net>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Robert+20Nelson+20+3Cjrnels+40sunvalley+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 6:38 PM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.
Cc:	jklauber@llgm.com
Subject:	PX conference call

I just participated in a conference call of the PX committee.  Our counsel
are urging the committee to clear them to commence an arbitration action to
recover the PX's claim against SCE.  This may be followed by a judicial
action seeking prejudgment relief in the form of an attachment.  A written
memo will be circulated shortly to the committee summarizing this course of
action.  The view seems to be that SCE has all but assured that it will be
suing PX and all the participants, and why not take the initiative.  Any
thoughts?


Thanks

Well done. That's the best rate we have seen for some time.

To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: PQP OPIC Certificates of Participation (COPs) Pricing

Rob, for your info.  the COP's were sold today.

The Investor spd over UST was 105 bps and the UST was 5.31%.


Mid Columbia.

   Kate Symes                01/11/2001 12:47 PM

To: Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Powerez Deal from 1/8/01

What's the delivery point on those deals?

Stephanie Piwetz   01/11/2001 10:48 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Powerez Deal from 1/8/01

Kate,
Pwx called this mroning to verbal a deal that  was sleeved with EES.  I do
not see it in system, although I see the deal on EES spreadsheet that I
receive daily.
the deal is Enron Buys Pwx   Q4 2001 25mws   255.00  done direct  trade date
1/8/01  Matt Motley trader
then Enron Sell EES  Q4 2001  25mws   $255.05

Should this be in the system and if so do you have deal numbers on the
above.  I believe we sleeved the deal for EES and Pwx.
Contact at EES, Judy (backoffice 7138535490)  Jubran Whalen is EES trader.

Thanks


The TX MONTHLY story.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	wms <wms@kainon.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 5:28 PM
To:	'jsteffe@enron.com'
Subject:	Enron in Texas Monthly too

 <<Enron Blew It - 11-01.doc>>
I just opened my Texas Monthly, only to find more Enron news.

Did you see it?  The article entitled
"HOW ENRON BLEW IT"
Enron's Cutthroat Culture (on the cover)
Texas Monthly, November 2001 By Mimi Swartz

For Houston's sake as the Energy Capital, we hope the best for Enron as it
turns this thing around.
Attached is the article and below is the link and an excerpt.

If you have any comments on the article, we always like to hear them.

Best, Mark
W. Mark Shirley, CPA
281.374.6700x230
www.kainon.com

http://www.texasmonthly.com/mag/issues/authors/mimiswartz.php

INTRO EXCERPT
The Houston-based energy giant put the pursuit of profits ahead of all other
corporate goals, which fostered a climate of workaholism and paranoia.  And
that was only part of the problem.  (from the table of contents).

Less than a year ago, the Houston-based energy behemoth had everything:
money, power, glitz, smarts, new ideas, and a CEO who wanted to make it the
most important company in the world. Now its stock is down, Wall Street is
bearish, and the CEO is gone. What went wrong?

"It ain't what you don't know that gets you in trouble; it's what you know
for sure that ain't so."       -Mark Twain

K   A   I   N   O   N      G   R   O   U   P
Consulting  +  Staffing  +  Recruiting

 - Enron Blew It - 11-01.doc


Thank you for shopping at Lands' End

Your order #7144896 is being processed.
Please refer to this number if you have any questions.

Order Items:

Men's Polartec Clog Slippers
Item: 55301A81, MarineBlue, Size: 10
$19.50

$19.50   Your merchandise total
$3.95   Shipping costs
$0.00   Taxes*
---------
$23.45   Total for this order

Payment:$23.45 MasterCard xxxxxxxxxxx78859

If you have questions about your order, please call us at 1-800-963-4816
(USA), or 608-935-6170 (Intl).  You can also reply to this e-mail.

Thank you for shopping at landsend.com.

Are you getting our free e-mail newsletter?
You can receive a periodic "heads up" e-mail with the
latest word about new products, online overstocks specials,
plus all the news from Dodgeville and environs.
Visit our sign-up page and subscribe today!
http://www.landsend.com/newsletter

*Taxes are estimated by our Web site, based on the total cost of all items.
Actual tax will be calculated when your order is processed.
Your bill will reflect the correct charge.


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 01:22 PM -----

	Suzanne Adams
	07/13/2000 10:14 AM

		 To: ric.doherty@compaq.com, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette
Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Addition to St. Clair Household

Carol had the baby at 10:15 p.m. last night.  Charles Eugene St. Clair
weighed 8lbs 8 ounces.

Carol is in Methodist Hospital, Room 633
6565 Fannin
Houston, TX
Phone Number is 713-790-3867


Yes,  It depends on when and how much.  Any details yet?

	Patricia_Cuero@Dell.com
	01/19/2001 11:08 AM

		 To: gerald.nemec@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ski trip

Are you still interested in the ski trip?

Thanks,
Patricia Cuero
Bus Ops, Program Manager
(512) 723-6977
(800)  289-3355 ext. 36977
(512) 728-3653 fax

"The only limits on what you can accomplish are the limits you place on your
own imagination."


Smarter Living Deal Alert!
Thursday, October 11, 2001
Visit http://www.SmarterLiving.com for a free subscription.
AOL

Thank you for subscribing to the Smarter Living Deal Alert!
newsletter. Please forward this to a friend!

************************ Sponsor ***************************
FIND GREAT TRAVEL DEALS AT ORBITZ!

- LAS VEGAS SALE! 2 NIGHTS AIR, HOTEL & MORE FROM $149
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/orbitz_vegas101101
AOL

- ORLANDO GETAWAY: 2 NIGHTS AIR AND HOTEL FROM $137
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/orbitz_orlando101101
AOL

- DEALS AT OVER 40,000 HOTELS WORLDWIDE!
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/orbitz_hotels101101
AOL

SEE MORE DEALS FOR TRAVEL NEAR AND FAR AT:
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/orbitz101101
AOL
************************************************************

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.  Travel Deals
  1. International Sale Fares With 10% Online Discount
  2. New Service to/from Washington (Baltimore) From $74 R/T
  3. Sale Fares From the Western U.S. to Mexico Starting at $149 R/T
  4. Airlines Offer Double Miles and Reduced Mileage Awards
  5. Weekend Hotel Rates From $49/Night and Weekday Savings Up to 40%
  6. Vegas Vacations on Sale: Airfare and Two Nights Hotel From $89

II. Special Discounts for Smarter Living Members
  7. Find Airfare for Up to 40% Less, Plus Save Up to $120 More!
  8. Rent a Car for Your Fall Trip Starting at Just $20 Per Day
  9. Get $50 Cash Back or 1000 Frequent Flier Miles on Hotel Stays!

III. Travel Columns
  10. Travel Consumers' Guide to Bankruptcy
  11. Best Bargains Are in the Cards--But Which One?
  12. Stress Management on the Road: Breathe Easy and Stay Healthy
  13. Halloween Haunts, Far and Wide

Looking for last-minute fares for travel this weekend? Search our
website at http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/searchfares_da
AOL

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I.  TRAVEL DEALS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1. INTERNATIONAL SALE FARES WITH 10% ONLINE DISCOUNT

American Airlines is offering sale fares from the U.S. to
destinations in the Caribbean, Latin America, and Europe, with
an additional 10 percent savings for booking online. Sale fares
are valid for travel through March 14, 2002. Purchase tickets
by Wednesday, October 17. Most major U.S. airlines have matched
this sale on competing routes. In addition, Northwest and United
are offering sale fares to Asia with similar travel dates.

For more details, please visit
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/da101101.1
AOL

~~~~~~~~~~~~

2. NEW SERVICE TO/FROM WASHINGTON (BALTIMORE) FROM $74 R/T

AirTran Airways has announced introductory sale fares to/from
Washington (Baltimore), in celebration of its new service to
Boston and Atlanta. Sale fares are valid for travel between
December 12 and February 13, 2002. Purchase tickets by Wednesday,
October 17. Book online and receive an additional five percent
discount.

For more details, please visit
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/da101101.2
AOL

~~~~~~~~~~~~

3. SALE FARES FROM THE WESTERN U.S. TO MEXICO STARTING AT $149 R/T

America West has released Web-only sale fares from cities in the
Western U.S. to destinations in Mexico. Fares are valid for travel
through March 14, 2002. Purchase tickets online only and no later
than 9 p.m. PT on Wednesday, October 17.

For more details, please visit
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/da101101.3
AOL

************************ Sponsor ***************************
WIN AN AFRICAN SAFARI AND FIND GREAT TRAVEL DEALS AT AWAY.COM!
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/Away101101a
AOL

UP TO 50% SAVINGS ON HOTELS, RESTAURANTS AND MORE WITH AN
ENTERTAINMENT BOOK. FREE SHIPPING FOR SMARTER LIVING MEMBERS
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/Entertainment101101b
AOL

HUNDREDS OF FREE CATALOGS IN ONE STEP! PLUS, ENTER TO WIN $500!
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/Catalog101101a
AOL
************************************************************

4. AIRLINES OFFER DOUBLE MILES AND REDUCED MILEAGE AWARDS

Most major North American airlines are offering double miles on
all flights through November 15. Seven of these airlines have
significantly reduced the number of miles required for award travel.
Two airlines are counting bonus miles toward future elite status,
and three have extended the validity of elite status by one year.

For more details, please visit
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/da101101.4
AOL

~~~~~~~~~~~~

5. WEEKEND HOTEL RATES FROM $49/NIGHT AND WEEKDAY SAVINGS UP TO 40%

Starwood Hotels and Resorts has announced weekend rates of $49 to
$179 per night for stays through January 27, 2002, and is also
offering 40 percent savings on weekday rates. This offer is available
at participating Four Points, Sheraton, W Hotels, or Westin locations.

For more details, please visit
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/da101101.5
AOL

~~~~~~~~~~~~

6. VEGAS VACATIONS ON SALE: AIRFARE AND TWO NIGHTS HOTEL FROM $89

Southwest Airlines has released a sale on vacation packages
to Las Vegas from cities throughout the U.S. Packages include
round-trip airfare and hotel accommodations, and are available
for travel on select dates from November 1 through January 11,
2002. Make reservations at least four days before departure and
no later than Wednesday, October 31.

For more details, please visit
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/da101101.6
AOL

************************ Sponsor ***************************
50% OFF SUBSCRIPTION RATE TO THE NEW YORK TIMES
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/NYTimes101101b
AOL

FREE FILM DEVELOPING, PRINTS AND AN ONLINE ALBUM FROM SNAPFISH
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/Snapfish101101
AOL
************************************************************

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
II. SPECIAL DISCOUNTS FOR SMARTER LIVING MEMBERS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

7. FIND AIRFARE FOR UP TO 40% LESS, PLUS SAVE UP TO $120 MORE!

Up to $120 off airfare: http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/priceline_da
AOL

~~~~~~~~~~~~

8. RENT A CAR FOR YOUR FALL TRIP STARTING AT JUST $20 PER DAY

Hertz savings: http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/hertz_da
AOL

Budget savings: http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/budget_da
AOL

Alamo savings: http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/alamoga_da
AOL

~~~~~~~~~~~~

9. GET $50 CASH BACK OR 1000 FREQUENT FLIER MILES ON HOTEL STAYS!

http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/hrn_da
AOL

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
III. TRAVEL COLUMNS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10. TRAVEL CONSUMERS' GUIDE TO BANKRUPTCY
    by Anita Dunham-Potter, Contributing Travel Editor

As the travel industry continues to stagger to its feet, it remains
unclear just how many airlines, cruise lines, and hotels will still
be standing when all is said and done. Whatever the outcome, travel
consumers will become painfully aware of a term called bankruptcy.

For the full story, please visit
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/da101101.10
AOL

~~~~~~~~~~~~

11. BEST BARGAINS ARE IN THE CARDS--BUT WHICH ONE?
    by Christopher Elliott

Reservations agents at hotels, car rental companies, and tour
operators don't always ask if you belong to a club or organization
that may entitle you to save money. It's a little bit like playing
poker. You have to know which cards to leave on the table and which
ones to keep in your pocket.

For the full story, please visit
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/da101101.11
AOL

~~~~~~~~~~~~

12. STRESS MANAGEMENT ON THE ROAD: BREATHE EASY AND STAY HEALTHY
    by Evelyn Hannon

Women travelers are likely to be subject to stress while traveling,
certainly until they've reached a certain plateau of self-confidence
and familiarity with cultural "rules." Hopefully the following pieces
of advice will help you to lower your levels of stress as you travel.

For the full story, please visit
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/da101101.12
AOL

~~~~~~~~~~~~

13. HALLOWEEN HAUNTS, FAR AND WIDE
    by Lisa Turner

Halloween falls on a Wednesday this year, so you might have to pass
on that trip to Transylvania. But there are plenty of creepy, crawly
places just a rental car drive, train trip, or plane hop away that
will get you in a Halloween mood.

For the full story, please visit
http://rd.SmarterLiving.com/da101101.13
AOL

---
Promotions covered in this newsletter may contain additional
restrictions and are subject to change. For complete details,
please contact the travel supplier. Fares often do not include
taxes or fees. Seats at these fares are often very limited.

Unauthorized distribution or commercial use of this e-mail is
strictly prohibited. Subscribers are granted permission to
forward this newsletter, so long as the newsletter is forwarded
in its entirety, without charge, and Smarter Living is given
credit as the author.

Copyright ? 2001 Smarter Living, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Smarter Living is a trademark of Smarter Living, Inc. Other
companies, products, or service names may be trademarks or
service marks of others and are referenced for informational
purposes only.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
To change your e-mail address or your subscriptions, or to
unsubscribe, please visit the Manage Subscriptions page at
http://www.SmarterLiving.com/subscribe/edit.html


I've contacted John Keffer and asked them to help.  I will initiate the
approval process to get he and Carolyn retained.

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           01/04/2001 08:43 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: 7EA Deals

Kay:

As you know, I just love to pile on. I took what I think are the latest form
docs and made some changes to incorporate additional commercial terms I want
to go out with. Please review the attached clean and redline drafts. In the
interest of time, would it be OK for Caroline to review (I've really got
people chomping at the bit).

Thanks,

Ben


please call to discuss x35007
---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000 10:56 AM
---------------------------

Robert J Cunningham <Robert.J.Cunningham@marshmc.com> on 12/14/2000 03:42:06
PM
To: "doug.leach" <doug.leach@enron.com> (IPM Return requested) (Receipt
notification requested)
cc: William A Mayer <William.A.Mayer.Jr@marshmc.com> (IPM Return requested)
(Receipt notification requested)
Subject: Hedge Volumes

Doug,

As we discussed, I am trying to get a feel for pricing if an insurance
company or companies  were to hedge some potential price exposures.
Please assume that the credit quality of your counterparty is A rated
or better.  Attached are some hypothetical volumes to hedge.  The
actual volumes hedged may be less or more.  I would sugest we look at a
cap and a swap (pay fixed, receive floating).  It would be appreciated
if you would please provide some indicative quotes.

If you need more please let me know.

Thanks.

Best regards,

Bob

____________________
Robert J Cunningham
Client Executive Vice President
Marsh USA Inc.
1000 Louisiana Street
Suite 4000
Houston, TX 77002-5008
Phone: (713) 427-0604
Fax: (713) 654-0444
Internet: Robert.J.Cunningham@marshmc.com
____________________

 - hedge volumes.xls


Frank, can you email us both a copy of the GTC that the counterparty is
seeing on the system.  Thanks!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2000 05:05 PM -----

	Marie Heard@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	05/02/2000 04:23 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL GTC's

Tana,

Will you send me the latest GTC's for bandwidth?

Thanks!


Dear Mr. Lay,

My name is Djoefree Hermanto and I am one of Enron
shareholders.

I just like to mention that I really have full
confident in you.

Even though, the current Enron situation financially
impacts my family, but I fully believe any decision
that you will make is definitely the best for everyone
of us.

I'll support you and your team with prayers.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
D. Hermanto

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping.
http://shopping.yahoo.com


i think they sell tickets for that dude's concert at the hollywood food store around the corner from my house.


Greetings every one,
I missed one number in pager, sorry.
My new cell and pager numbers are:

cell 		713-859-6075
Pager/bberry 	877-654-1955

Thanks.
Madhup


shes pretty sexy, huh?  are we getting together to talk europe tonoght?

"Brian Hoskins" <Brian_Hoskins@enron.com> on 01/25/2000 10:18:49 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Evite: Super Bowl Party

Eric, you have way too much time on your hands.

Damn boy, are you gonna bust a move on the secretary?

"Eric Bass" <ebass@ect.enron.com> on 01/25/2000 02:11:01 AM

To:   Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Evite: Super Bowl Party

Hi!

I'd like to invite you to: Super Bowl Party

Just click on the link below, and it will take you to my personal Evite
event page to see everyone's comments, RSVP, and get all the details.

http://www.evite.com/respond?iid=AIKFBNAYGEFDHRZFVUSW

I hope you can make it, and I look forward to seeing your reply on the event
page!

Cheers!

Eric Bass

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
HAVING TROUBLE?

If nothing happens when you click the link above, use your mouse to cut
and paste the entire address into your Web browser, then hit return.
Make sure you copy it exactly as it appears above. That will take you to
the invite. (Note: Some AOL users may need to access their invite through
the Evite homepage. See instructions below.)

If you can't access the invite page:

1. Go to http://www.evite.com/
2. Log in (if you are already a member) or sign up for an Evite account,
using the same email address the organizer used to contact you about this
event.
3. Go to your "My Invites" inbox and click the event title to view your
invite!

----------------------------------------------
Brought to you by Evite
Check out http://www.evite.com/ today.
Getting your friends together just got easier.

 - att1.htm


Guys, I can't recall how the corporate opportunity is managed between Canada
and the US for these customers particularily with regard to their
transactions in Michigan et al.  Is Eastern Canada now managed by the Central
desk from a trading and mid-market point of view since Story came down to
Houston? How are the structured deals managed?  Is this still the right split
for the business?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/20/2001
06:06 PM ---------------------------
From: Laura Luce@ENRON on 01/19/2001 11:49 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Eastern Canada

As we continue to define goals/objectives and coverage staffing in alignment
with the corresponding trading group, I assumed that Eastern Canada
origination would fall within the central region.  Specifically opportunities
with Enbridge, Consumers and Union due to mid-market/trading coverage
previously being at the central desk.  I understand there is history to this
division and I have no desire to start any new issues or create larger
organizational issues.   In the gas re-organization, how did you
strategically divide Eastern Canada?

I would appreciate your direction or decision.

Thanx,
Laura


You might want to check it

Are you still planning to come up and sign papers tomorrow?  I need to know because I had to go back to work early.

Please call my cell phone when you get logged off so we can get in sync with plans.

503/810-1105


HERE IS STAFF'S SECOND SET OF DATA REQUESTS TO AVISTA ENERGY INC.,
BP  ENERGY CO., CORAL POWER, L.L.C., IDACORP ENERGY CORP. LP,
PUGET SOUND ENERGY,  SEMPRA ENERGY TRADING CORP.
 - data request 2 to sellers.wpd
 - STAFF 2ND REQUEST TO SELLERS.rtf


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/19/2001 07:50 AM -----

	Christie Patrick@ECT
	03/15/2001 10:02 AM

		 To: Alice Weekley/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Jordan
Hunter/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Stephen Veatch/Enron@EnronXGate, Frank S
Wang/Corp/Enron@Enron, ricardo_n_calvo@urscorp, roger_w_gunther@ursc
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Lauren Iannarone/NY/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Calypso Tribal Letters

Friends,

The statute should be reviewed by whichever lawyer is supporting the project.

 As I mentioned to Alice Weekley, I am unfamiliar with the recent amendments
referenced requiring the notice for projects that do not actually cross
reservation property. The amendment does not surprise me though.

 In the past, for example, during the Transwestern expansion in '91, we
developed a comprehensive NAGPRA plan with tribes whose reservations we
crossed, yet neighboring tribes were included--the thinking by the various
State Historic Preservation officers was that unearthed remains (bones,
funerial objects, pottery pieces, holy objects, etc) may have belonged to
tribes other than those from whose reservation they were ultimately
unearthed.  It made for a VERY VERY long and complicated plan and
consultation process....not only when objects were unearthed, but simply
putting the required anticipatory plan and procedures in place PRIOR to
construction.  (It gives me a chuckle: my late husband, Leonard Hilton, who
was in charge of the TW project, is likely rolling in his own grave at the
mere thought of Enron having to put another of these plans
together..Haha!!)   As I said, I've not read the amendment , but hopefully it
only legally requires 'notice'---yet, in my nearly 20 years of practicing
law, I've rarely seen  a 'notice' that didn't crack the door or sound the
alarm of further buerocratic opportunity!

For your further information, I have met Billie Ray Cypress personally and
he's a decent and seemingly reasonable guy with a huge casino on the rez ;
yet these personal attributes frequently go by the wayside when it comes to
'perceived economic opportunity'.
 Chief James Billie,[chief of the Seminoles, 2nd largest/2nd wealthiest tribe
in North America] on the other hand, is shrewd in business, dictitorial in
management, and personally , has an ego bigger than Texas, behavior to match,
and is proud of it!! --which makes him a ton of fun to be with if he likes
you--he wrestles alligators, writes rock and roll and "plays"in whatever
stage opportunity is presented him--as long as he can be the center of
attention.  The Seminoles have not only a tribal web site, James Billie has
his own!!  Check it out--it's a hoot!!  He has been chief for about 25 years
(and I'm guessing he's maybe in his early 50's).  The Seminoles have
recognized significant economic development under James, but he is definitely
a "My way or the highway" kind of guy--he loves you, hates you, or ignores
you--and he has a tribal council that is respectfully terrified of him. If
any activity smacks of anything James Billie doesn't like, he'll know no
limits in stopping it...remember, this guy wrestles alligators!! No Joke!

I don't recognize the other names on the list, but I think it's clear from
both the beurocratic issues, as well as the specific tribal issues incident
to each affected tribe, everything associated with the process should be
executed with all of this in mind.  I'd be happy to speak with the project's
lawyer to discuss this further, if information beyond that set forth above
would be helpful.

Thanks!

--Christie.

----- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2001 08:53 AM -----

	roger_w_gunther@urscorp.com
	03/15/2001 08:32 AM

		 To: alice.weekley@enron.com
		 cc: jordan.hunter@enron.com, stephen.veatch@enron.com,
frank_s_wang@enron.com, christie.patrick@enron.com,
ricardo_n_calvo@urscorp.com
		 Subject: Calypso Tribal Letters

Alice:

Janus Research sent the enclosed letters to me;  I understand that they
have been modified per your discussions with them.  Also enclosed is a
summary document outlining recent revisions to Section 106 (National
Historic Preservation Act).

Regards,

Roger

(See attached file: Section 106 regs (1).doc)(See attached file: Fred
McGhee 3-7-01.doc)(See attached file: James Billie 3-7-01.doc)(See attached
file: Jerry Haney 3-7-01.doc)(See attached file: R. Perry Beaver
2-7-01.doc)(See attached file: Billie Cypress 3-7-01.doc)
 - Section 106 regs (1).doc
 - Fred McGhee 3-7-01.doc
 - James Billie 3-7-01.doc
 - Jerry Haney 3-7-01.doc
 - R. Perry Beaver 2-7-01.doc
 - Billie Cypress 3-7-01.doc


Well it appears that Jimmy is the only one with too much time on his
hands.  Anyway, I am at home today and got to my part.  It is
attached.  Please let me know if you feel I should add anything.  I am
leaving very early Sunday morning to go on a business trip for the week.  I
will not be in class Monday or Tuesday and do not get back to the Bay area
until Saturday.  I will be checking my email so let me know what I need to
do for the next case.

Thanks for taking responsibility for this case Jeff.

Dylan

At 11:04 AM 9/15/00 -0500, jdasovic@enron.com wrote:

>Well, I was clearly too ambitious in setting out the schedule.  My
>apologies.  I managed to trudge through the reading and the document last
>night, but didn't not get to answering the question.  I appears that this
>will be a busy weekend.  I've a feeling that I won't get my proposed answer
>to folks until Saturday afternoon for your review.  If that poses a problem
>for anyone, please let me know.  I still intend to be the compiler of
>wisdom, so folks should feel free to distribute when they've got something
>drafted.
>
>Best,
>Jeff

 - Patten case.doc


Rick:  This is what Maggy and I have been helping Julia with lately.  We met with Jeff McMahon on this earlier in the week.  FYI.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farrell, Keegan
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	Battaglia, Tim; McKone, Tim; Murray, Julia; 'rrice@bracepatt.com'; Stoler, Lou; Del vecchio, Peter
Cc:	Huson, Margaret; Yoho, Lisa
Subject:	On Behalf of Steve Van Hooser - Generic GTC for EIM  Transactions
Importance:	High

As promised, attached is the Working Draft of the Generic EIM GTC for your review and use.  As indicated, this is not a final product, and as such I would appreciate your assistance in catching typos, cross-reference busts and inconsistencies.

Thanks,
Steve

Steve Van Hooser
Enron North America Corp.
713-853-7238
713-646-3490 (fax)


- MeadMktplace.xls


Steve -

Sorry for the delay on this end.  I have been waiting for one approval on the
non-solicitation provision I had forwarded.  I would suggest inserting the
language I suggested (another copy of which is attached) and preparing final
documents.  I should know later today or tomorrow if I have final approval.

Thanks again for the patience.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 10/27/2000
03:57 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Joannie Williamson                           10/27/2000 04:05 PM

To: Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Investor Relations Org Chart

Per your request.


-----Original Message-----
From:  Lara Fields
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 5:09 PM
To: Product Control - Houston
Cc: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group
Subject: Access Rights for Credit Instruments

Hi guys,

This came up in the conference call today... but I forgot who it actually was
who requested the information.  Please disregard (or use) as necessary.

Lara
---------------------- Forwarded by Lara Fields/LON/ECT on 18/04/2001 18:08
---------------------------
From: Lara Fields on 23/03/2001 09:47
To: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Access Rights for Credit Instruments

Reminder on the rules for Credit Default Swaps and Bankruptcy Swaps (see
Anna's email from earlier this morning as well).

---------------------- Forwarded by Lara Fields/LON/ECT on 23/03/2001 09:47
---------------------------
From: Lara Fields on 16/02/2001 17:26
To: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT, Product Control -
Houston, EOL Call Center
cc: Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Alan Merson/EU/Enron@Enron

Subject: Access Rights for Credit Instruments

Hi guys,

We're launching (new) Bankruptcy Swaps and brand new Credit Default Swaps on
Monday.

As usual there are 'special' rules that surround these products.  I'm in the
process of setting all the Guest Profiles to reflect these rules but wanted
to pass the information on for PAs that we receive.
Houston- can you please forward to your appropriate Legal teams?  if they
have specific questions regarding these products or the legal framework
surrounding them, please refer them to Denis O'Connell, the London lawyer who
has worked on the GTCs etc.

 Credit Default Swaps
You have to be a special kind of counterparty to trade these products (please
see Denis for required documentation needed) and they are taking a very
targeted marketing approach to their customers.  Because of this (for now)
only US and UK counterparties can have View access.

Bankruptcy Swaps - we used to have 5 product types for Bankruptcy Swaps (Nor,
UK, US, SE, FI) but these have been consolidated under new terms into 1
(Global) Bankruptcy Swap.  The other 5 product types will be moved to
Inactive as they have never traded.

Also, a new Web Filter will be used to pull in the new Bankruptcy and Credit
Default Swaps - Global Credit Instruments.  Please advise any customers to
use this web filter to view the products (provided they are in a country who
has been approved to View/Trade them).

Please reference the table and the list below for information on Guest Access
for the different Countries.

If you have any questions at all, please give us a call.

Lara
---------------------- Forwarded by Lara Fields/LON/ECT on 16/02/2001 17:18
---------------------------
From: Lara Fields on 16/02/2001 11:16
To: Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Merson/EU/Enron@Enron, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Access Rights

Hi Denis,

I'm trying to figure out what the 'Rules' are for the Bankruptcy and Credit
Default Swaps go as far as Guest Access to EnronOnline.

Based upon your profile spreadsheet from Wednesday, here's what it looks
like.  Please let me know if there are any differences as I will be
communicating these rules to the London and Houston Product Control Groups.

Also, can you please tell me which countries Could and Could Not trade the
two products (with proper certification in place of course).  As discussed
earlier this week, I believe you will be communicating this to the Houston
Legal team directly... so I'm just asking as an fyi.

Thanks,
Lara

In the table below - 'N' means the country can Not View the products, 'R'
means the country can View the products

Also can you please tell me what the rules are for the following countries
for both Bankruptcy and CDS:
Per Denis O'Connell, none of the below Countries can have VIEW access to
either CDS or Bankruptcy Swaps


Would you like to respond?!
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/12/99 01:32 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Bob Shults                           10/12/99 10:15 AM

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Online Derivatives Trading with Regulated Utilities

Does this mean that we have 10 utilities that are approved to trade?  What
are we doing with the other 30-40?
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 10/12/99 10:14 AM
---------------------------
To: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Port/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Online Derivatives Trading with Regulated Utilities

We have not decided "to prevent any regulated utility from completing any
financial transactions" online.  If we have already satisfactorily concluded
the necessary due diligence with respect to a particular utility, they will
be approved.  It is only with respect to those utilities which have not yet
been researched that we are withholding approval.  The due diligence required
involves asking the utility for certain information concerning their
organization and regulatory situation, hiring local counsel in the relevant
state and having research done into the laws and regulations in place there
and into any public utility commission orders respecting the particular
utility in question, and on occasion requesting an opinion letter from the
utility's counsel.  We usually begin that process only when a trader believes
there is a likelihood of a sufficient volume of trading with the utility to
justify the time and expense.  FYI, the due diligence process has in the past
revealed circumstances which prevented the utility from trading derivatives
or required actions to authorize such trading which had not been taken.

A recent count showed about 10 executed master agreements and another 30 to
40 in one stage or another of the due diligence/negotiation process.

Louise Kitchen
10/06/99 02:46 PM
To: Mark E Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Port/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Customer Data

On Friday we will be receiving the remaining customer list from credit, due
to the timescales I am asking for turnaround on the customer matrix and
master agreement review by the end of play Tuesday 12th October.

Any problems with this please notify me immediately as we are now running up
against very tight deadlines in terms of getting all of the information in
the system for the launch schedule.

Thanks

Louise

Mark,
On another note we are requesting a review of the blanket decision which has
been made to prevent any regulated utility from completing any financial
transactions, if we are not prepared to do the due diligence on which ones
can transact and which ones can not - is this our responsibility or theirs?
ie their decision whether to trade or not.
Louise


Angie asked me to imput VNG contract 100104.  I didn't know the rate.  Sitara
deal 484810.
Scott


Please find the interview packet for the above-referenced candidate.  The
interview will occur on Friday January 12, 2001.  Please print all documents
for your reference.  If you have any questions, or conflicts of schedule,
please do not hesitate to contact me.

Shawn Grady
58701


Greg Whalley
John Lavorato
Louise Kitchen
Greg Piper
Mark Pickering
Brad Richter
Jay Webb
Savita Puthigai
Bob Hillier


Your mailbox has exceeded one or more size limits set by your administrator.
Your mailbox size is 81721 KB.
Mailbox size limits:
	You will receive a warning when your mailbox reaches 75000 KB.You may not be able to send or receive new mail until you reduce your mailbox size.
To make more space available, delete any items that you are no longer using or move them to your personal folder file (.pst).
Items in all of your mailbox folders including the Deleted Items and Sent Items folders count against your size limit.
You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.
See client Help for more information.