----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2000 07:43 AM -----

	Tom Moran
	05/22/2000 06:41 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts
and Facilities, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EOL / Credit / GCP Responses 5/22/00

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 5/22/00

Regards
tm


John,

Just finished the continous trading case.   Please see
the two attached files. Let me know if you want to add
more scenarios.

Happy holidays !

Zimin

---------------- Attachment ------------------

Open-close trading:

Close-close trading:


Here it comes.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lavorato, John
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 8:00 AM
To:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	RE: Dailies w/ Prudency

Do we have this for power?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:53 AM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	Dailies w/ Prudency

 << File: Dailytotalfinal(a).xls >>
Here is the correct file.


I will be out of the office from 10/07/2000 until 10/15/2000.

I will respond to your message when I return.


We at IntercontinentalExchange would like to announce the relocation of our Houston office.
The new address is:
1415 Lousiana, suite 3350
Houston, TX 77002

New phone numbers:
Lance Leffingwell  713-571-6691
JC Kneale   713-571-7821
Fax 713-571-8243

If you have any questions please feel free to contact us and we look forward to serving you!

Thank you,
IntercontinentalExchange


Attached are summaries of two SoCalGas advice letters.? Some info here  on
consolidated billing may be of interest to your gas marketers, but does not
appear to be protest material.
?
Dan
 - 11-28-00 SoCalGas AL Summary Chart.doc


I suggest the changes as shown on the attached.

Chris is researching a drawing number so that we have them committed to a
certain specification.

I've added the concept of a date certain for the delivery.  I'm referring to
these as "Equipment" and part of the "Units" so it is clear that the
warranties apply.

Is there any change to the sound guaranty level (or other guarantees) for the
units utilizing these stacks?

Kay

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Booth.Chris@enron.com, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: LM6K Change Order #2

Kay:

Attached is Change Order #2 which has the changes Chris Booth made and a few
minor type type changes I made.  I don't know Chris Calger or his title, so
if you would like me to obtain his signature, please advise.

Kathy
x56400


Please add Ainsley Gaddis to your EES mailing list. She needs to begin receving our daily EES trade log ASAP.

Let me know if you have questions.

Thanks,
Kate


Catherine:  Lisa phoned me and said she would give you a heads up that this
second change order needed review and quick turn around.  Coincidentally, Kay
Mann is reviewing change order # 1 and will be looking into the change from
LJM to E-Next Generation language implications.  Hopefully the comments on
one will apply to the other.  Suggest you call Kay straight away to save time.

I am attaching both for your convenience.  I look forward to you comments.
By the way Kay; GE is looking it over right now too, and Scott Dieball has
been asked to review.  I Scott's review is not necessary please let me know.


"I accept the terms and conditions of this Pilot Participant Agreement."
Martin Cuilla
x35933

	From:  ClickAtHomePilot2                           11/08/2000 10:06 AM

Sent by: Suzanne Brown
To: Chris Cockrell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Allen
Cohrs/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Brad Coleman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mark Cooper/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Gina
Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Emile
Courrege/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paige Cox/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Penny Crane/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Michael
Cuccia/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Cullison/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Pamela Culpepper/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dan
Cummings/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Steve
Dahnke/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Dallman/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Glenn
Darrah/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lohit Datta-Barua/OTS/Enron@Enron, Raul
Davila/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Clara Davis/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Kevin M
Davis/ECF/Enron@Enron, Don Daze/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ryan Deane/SF/ECT@ECT,
Juanita Delgado/HOU/EES@EES, Mike Denzel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Derrett/HOU/EES@EES, LaDonna Dervin/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Desbiens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Determeyer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Leslie D
Dever/HOU/EES@EES, Mike Deville/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Jo
Wilson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ashley Dietz/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Richard DiMichele/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Huy Dinh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trang
Dinh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Danny Doan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karla
Dobbs/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jodi Dobrinski/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Margaret
Doucette/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kevin Dumas/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Tina Dunnaway/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dianna
Dupree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos Duran/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Deborah P Durr/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Judy Dyess/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Dypiangco/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Calvin Eakins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Max Eberts/HOU/EES@EES, Monica Edwards/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Karen E Ehlert/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David
Eldridge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Connie Emerson/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Kenton Erwin/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Cynthia U
Espinoza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Javier Espinoza/HOU/EES@EES,
Carrie Evans/HOU/EES@EES, Leo Fajardo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Charles
Falgout/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Lachandra
Fenceroy/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Youyi Feng/NA/Enron@Enron, Roger
Fernandez/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Lee Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Kathy
Fink/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dara M Flinn/HOU/EES@EES, Darlene C
Forsyth/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Frank/OTS/Enron@Enron, Paul Fraser/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Lamar Frazier/NA/Enron@Enron, Perry
Frazier/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Darryl S Free/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Elba Funes/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Bruno Gaillard/EU/Enron@Enron, Sonja Galloway/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amy
Gambill/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ava Garcia/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Frances
Garcia/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Orlando Garcia/HOU/EES@EES, Susan
Gensichen/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Robert H George/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave
Gerstenkorn/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tom Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Beverly
Gilmore/GCO/Enron@ENRON, James Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Matt Gitchell/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Sharon Gonzales/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chuck Good/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth A
Goodman/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Goodman/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Sherry J
Graham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alma Green/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Vance
Griffith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Angela Grohol/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Marlin Gubser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chuck Hahn/SFO/EES@EES, Gigi
Hall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Harada/HOU/EES@EES, Glenn
Harbers/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Russell Hardie/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Hargrave/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cole Harper/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: An Invitation to Participate to the Second Pilot of ClickAtHome

We are excited to extend an invitation to you to participate in the second
Pilot of Enron's new ClickAtHome program.

You have been invited to participate by your Human Resources department or a
ClickAtHome project member.

The ClickAtHome program is Enron's new innovative program to provide eligible
employees high-speed internet access where available, with a high-end
computer and high-speed internet connection.

If you are interested in participating in the ClickAtHome pilot program,
please read all of the materials below and electronically return the PILOT
Agreement with your consent by stating that you accept the terms and
conditions of the agreement in a reply e-mail to this invitation.  The only
action required of you at this time is described below under PILOT
agreement.  The ordering websites will open in about two to three weeks and
are NOT accessible at this time.

Pilot Kickoff2 11-2.ppt - Details pilot member expectations, commitments, and
a tentative pilot time table.

Terms and Conditions - Program terms and conditions. You will be asked to
accept or decline these terms and conditions before
you order your computer and/or internet connection on the pilot web site.

Employee Election Agreement - Please read. You will be asked to accept or
decline this agreement before you order your computer and/or internet
connection on the pilot web site.

Pilot Agreement - Please return the pilot agreement electronically by
replying to this mailbox (clickathomepilot2@enron.com) and stating: "I accept
the terms and conditions of this Pilot Participant Agreement."  if you would
like to participate.  To sign up for Pilot Two, please return via email by
11/10.


for the 16th, yes we swung down to nearly zero on storage, but in a few
markets we were delivering SST from pool and FT and had to overdeliver. It
gets banked and cashed out annually.

that 66,000 is about the discrepancey I see over the last 8 days.

Chris Germany@ECT
01/19/2001 04:17 PM
To: Jeffrey Porter/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: 12/31 Actuals

Just looking high level, I see 3 days where storage is off by more than 1,000
dt's that I will check into.

Date Sitara  Jeff's
24th 54245  55720
26th 25058  32794
28th 39388  40053

I don't understand your storage number on the 16th.  Does that mean you
banked gas that day?

Also, I setup a column for Navigator numbers and it looks like we took out
66,000 for ENA.

I need to reconcile storage back to Nov so I can track what we took out vs.
what we pay New Power for.


Over the last several years, we've received numerous questions and candid
comments from many of you on a wide range of topics during our eSpeak
sessions and through the Office of the Chairman online mailbox and
voicemail.  While eSpeak is an open, informal chat between employees and
management, the Office of the Chairman online mailbox and voicemail box are
designed as confidential upward feedback tools for employees who choose
anonymity.  We are pleased that many of you have openly expressed your
thoughts and your identity, which made it possible for us to quickly respond
to your questions and concerns.  This is the kind of work environment we all
must strive for at Enron, and we encourage you to continue sending us
comments about the things that are important to you.

Many times, however, we wanted to respond to those of you who contacted us
anonymously with your good ideas, observations and questions.  We now have a
way to do this while maintaining your confidentiality.  In the future, when
we receive an anonymous question or comment from an employee, both the
question and our response will be posted on eMeet.  This will allow us to
answer all the questions that we receive, and it will give other employees an
opportunity to provide their insight, if they choose to do so, since eMeet is
an open discussion board.

Remember:  You can send your questions and comments to us in two ways:
 - email to Office of the Chairman, or
 - Office of the Chairman voicemail box at 713-853-7294, which is a
confidential call

Promoting open and honest communication is consistent with our Vision and
Values and absolutely vital to our continued success as a company.  So don't
be hesitant or afraid to speak your mind.  We want to hear from you.


Start Date: 1/28/02; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012811.txt


Tonya,

Any news on a proposal for the DOT?  Attached are the interval data for the accounts.  They called yesterday wondering about the proposal.

Please let me know.

Thanks,

Bill
---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Hatch/HOU/EES on 07/27/2001 01:36 PM ---------------------------

Bill Hatch
07/11/2001 03:37 PM
To:	Tonya Thomas/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	D.O.T. Interval Data

Tonya,

Here is the interval data you requested to do a pricing proposal for DOT behind NSTAR.  Please let me know if this is sufficient and when we can expect to have a proposal to submit to the GSA.

Thanks,

Bill
---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Hatch/HOU/EES on 07/11/2001 03:36 PM ---------------------------

roman.piaskoski@gsa.gov on 07/11/2001 02:42:18 PM
To:	bhatch@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	D.O.T. Interval Data

Bill, have not even looked at these ... passing them on ... let me know ...
RP
---------------------- Forwarded by Roman J. Piaskoski/1PMF/R01/GSA/GOV on
07/11/2001 02:41 PM ---------------------------

"DeRusso, Cynthia" <Cynthia_DeRusso@nstaronline.com> on 07/11/2001 12:30:20
PM

To:   "Costa, Thomas" <Thomas_Costa@nstaronline.com>,
      "'roman.piaskoski@gsa.gov'" <roman.piaskoski@gsa.gov>
cc:   "Milton, John" <John_Milton@nstaronline.com>, "Jerz, Joseph"
      <Joseph_Jerz@nstaronline.com>

Subject:  D.O.T. Interval Data

Thom,

I've attached 2 spreadsheets containing 18 months of hourly interval data
for 1 D.O.T. account.  The period is from 01/01/00 to 06/25/01.

Account number 1150-064-0021 has 2 contributors of interval data.

If you have any questions, please contact me.
Cynthia
x-2072

 <<0610351y00y01.xls>>  <<0610352y00y01.xls>>

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
**********************************************************************

(See attached file: 0610351y00y01.xls)
(See attached file: 0610352y00y01.xls)

 - 0610351y00y01.xls
 - 0610352y00y01.xls


Regarding the January 1, 1998 GISB and the April 1, 1998 GISB, the January 1,
1998 agreement appears to be a better fit for trading matters which could
extend beyond one month.  I assume that this was assigned to ENA.


In case you did not have this,Fairbanks is our contact re stolen property.
Freddie took the property
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 04/22/2001 01:48 PM -----

To Do

Subject:
Call Jonathon Fairbanks 713-850-9002w/713-703-8294c and Freddy Fredrickson
713-882-2279c re stolen mat

Starts:

Priority:

Due:

Type:

Others cannot see any details about this event.

Have Notes notify you before the event.

Categorize:

Description:


Stephen -

Here is the final LOI for your deal.  As I indicated, I will be in meetings
in the morning, but if you need to get to me, please call my assistant - Nita
Garcia at x. 39559.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


We contacted International Paper Corp. when they first applied and found that
they are related, but they are separate entities from International Paper
Company.  International Paper Corp. is a division of International Paper
Company according to Walter Guidroz's notes in the Access Database.  Cheryl,
can you contact someone at International Paper Corp. and see what the
relationship is for sure?  The applicant may be wrong and not sure what or
who to talk to over there to get the correct answer.

Thank you,
Karen O'Day
x54135

Bernice Rodriguez@ECT
03/19/2001 09:09 AM
To: Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: CP/ID 93394, International Paper Corporation (2nd time sent)

---------------------- Forwarded by Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
09:09 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Samuel Schott                           03/16/2001 11:45 PM

To: Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CP/ID 93394, International Paper Corporation (2nd time sent)

Hey Bernice,

I got an error message while trying to send this message to Karen O'Day.
Would you resend it to her. Although, I believe Claudia is back, so we should
be fine.

Samuel
---------------------- Forwarded by Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2001 11:43
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Samuel Schott                           03/16/2001 11:42 PM

To: karen.o'day@enron.com, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CP/ID 93394, International Paper Corporation (2nd time sent)

Hi Karen,

I'm in agreement with Tana's message below. I understand that the Trader /
Requester
applied to EOL as International Paper Corporation, however, after further
investigation,
DnB supports that the location of this company is actually a Branch location
of International Paper Company, CP/ID 1836 - - already an EOL counterparty.

Please confirm and advise.

Please contact Bernice Rodriguez if an inactivation of this Branch record is
in order.

Bernice, if an inactivation occurs, would you adjust the spreadsheet above on
the O: drive
and resend it to our EOL distribution as an EOL 03-07-01 Amendment.

Thanks !!

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_Enron Networks)

---------------------- Forwarded by Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2001 11:10
PM ---------------------------
From: Tana Jones on 03/15/2001 06:23 PM
To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: International Paper Corporation

The above counterparty on the 3/7/01 list is ID#93394.  We had a counterparty
on the pre-approval list that was called International Paper Company and was
ID#1836.  Was that one in error?  Are they the same, different?  What's the
scoop?

Thanks for your help!


Please note that we have added another product type (bringing the total
number to three)!.
We have built three new Products Types called US Bandwidth DS3 Physical
Forward, US Bandwidth OC3 Physical Forward, and US Bandwidth OC3c Physical
Forward. Please go into DataManager and approve these Product Types (look at
attached Document for long descriptions).  We are going life on the 1st of
May.  If you need help with the approval process contact Dale Neuner (ext.
39746) or myself (ext. 39938). Please Do Not Reject the Product Type. If you
have questions or changes to the Product Type please contact me at your
convenience.

Thank you very much for your co-operation!

Leonardo Pacheco
ext. 39938


Attached is the Enron Global Markets IR/FX Trading violation memo for  Net
Open Position for June 14, 2001.  The Office of the Chairman for Enron Global
Markets is responsible for printing out a hard copy of this memo, signing it
and returning the hard copy to Chris Abel at 3155a, who will forward it to
RAC to obtain their signature.

Thank You


I know this is the same as before, but are interested after this week's
action?

Ricky and Warrick for Carter and Smith?


Congrats on finally accomplishing something.  Have got some good gossip, but
I almost got busted a minute ago so you're gonna have to wait!!

Robin


Confidential - Attorney Client Privlege

Please give me your thoughts on the attached proposal to resolve the "dangling chads" with AEP.  I have attached the proposal and a "value analysis" of the proposal, both of which I propose to send to AEP.  The key benefits of the proposal from Enron's perspective are the following:

1.	Removes us from the vagueness and uncapped exposure of the Ducote deal with Entex for additional costs.  AEP can capture the economics of future gas deliveres to Entex associated with this capital expenditure.

2.	Captures the leverage that AEP will have in the Entex audit.  I think for ENA to pursue Entex would be difficult/time consuming and may lead to a tortious interference suit from AEP.

3.	Gives up the interest payment we think AEP owes us.  This is true value we are giving up, but do we really want to fight with AEP in court over this (to the extent they are not bluffing)?

4.	Removes us from having to process imbalances - saving manpower costs and further removing us from hassles with AEP.  AEP is better able to capture value from these imbalances then we are, since they have the pipe.

5.	Gets us out of the Coastline law suit.  I'm pretty sure Coastline is at least owed the $1.4MM that we would contribute.  AEP has a chance to minimize any further costs, which are capped by the value of the claim at a further $2.2MM.

Please do not circulate this.

Thanks,
Brian


FYI - those of you running firm books.  These adjustments described below are
due to firm book PMA's we recieve from Tiffany Miller.  In the future, we
need to put these in the appropriate schedules - C & E.  Schedule C should be
used for MTM adjustments and Schedule E should be used for all other
adjustments.  Shout with any questions.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001
08:42 AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey C Gossett
03/12/2001 08:03 AM
To: Greg Whiting/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Topside adjustments to rolls

Please clarify.  Thanks.

Greg Whiting@ENRON
03/09/2001 02:38 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Elaine Schield/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Topside adjustments to rolls

Jeff,

I need your help with a few items.  In the DPR rolls for several books this
month there were topside adjustments inserted.  It was my understanding that
all topsides would be included on the associated roll schedules (Sch E and
Sch C).  Investigating all of these is greatly increasing our reconciliation
time.  Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.  Here are a few
books that had topsides:

MTM Topsides that should have been on Schedule C
GD-Central
FT-Texas
FT-Central
Liquidation topsides that should have been on Schedule E
GD-Central
FT-Northwest
FT-Ontario

Let me know if you need more information or if there is anything we can do to
help.  Thanks.

     Greg x35399


We've never done this, I'm just thinking they may work with us on it since no
one knew the rates were going to be effective 2/1/2001.

Suzanne Calcagno@ENRON
02/05/2001 10:54 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Trco Backhaul Rates

Does that usually work?  Do you get a secondary priority or do they flow it
as primary?  I'm not used to getting discounts so I'm curious!


This is sweet.
---------------------- Forwarded by B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
12:19 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  B Scott Palmer                           06/13/2000 10:39 AM

To: B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: For you professional drinkers!!

---------------------- Forwarded by B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000
10:38 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca S Mize                           07/21/99 04:22 PM

To: Jessica V Moreno/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott
Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: For you professional drinkers!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca S Mize/HOU/ECT on 07/21/99 04:21
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Mize, Jeffrey N." <jmize@utmb.edu>                           07/21/99
12:19 PM

To: "'Carla Homer'" <chomer@capstonefinancial.com>, "Bell, Carole"
<cbell@EMAIL.UTMB.EDU>, "Johnson, Jana B." <jbjohnso@EMAIL.UTMB.EDU>, "'Jimbo
Chambers'" <james.chambers@compaq.com>, "Boysen, Karl"
<kboysen@EMAIL.UTMB.EDU>, "Swift, Lauren" <lsswift@EMAIL.UTMB.EDU>, "Kowis,
Lisa R." <lkowis@EMAIL.UTMB.EDU>, "Rhame, Liz" <lrhame@EMAIL.UTMB.EDU>,
"'Michelle Birsinger'" <mrb@bcm.tmc.edu>, "Peikert, Quintin W."
<qpeikert@EMAIL.UTMB.EDU>, Rebecca S Mize/HOU/ECT, "'David Grissom'"
<sq6dave@aol.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: For you professional drinkers!!

Here's something useful.

>  <<100pr.exe>>

 - 100pr.exe


hi back


FYI.  It appears that the California Governor is working pretty hard to stop
this market.  We are looking into the politics behind this letter, especially
who in the administration drove this dramatic response.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 07/28/2000
07:29 AM ---------------------------

Jeff Dasovich on 07/27/2000 08:05:28 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES,
Mary Hain@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman@EES, Dave Parquet@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Tim Belden@ECT, Robert Badeer@ECT, Mark Palmer, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Roger
Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Kathleen E Magruder/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: California Governor Comes Out Hard for Price Caps

Just received by fax a press release and letters sent by Davis to Jim
Hoecker, the Chair and the CEO of the ISO, the Chair and the CEO of the PX,
the Pres. of the PUC, the Chair of the Energy Oversight Board.  The language
is highly charged and negative.  Tim/Bob:  Note call for caps on PX
equivalent to caps in ISO real time market.  In sum:

Letter to Chair and CEO of the ISO
Apply to FERC for extension of rate cap authority
Apply to FERC for finding that market is not competitive.
Reduce wholesale price cap to lowest reasonable level.

Letter to Chair and CEO of PX
Apply to FERC for bid caps in day-ahead and day-of spot markets equal to ISO
caps in real time markets.

Letter to Pres of PUC
Wholesale electricity market lacks competition.
Support filings that he's asked the ISO and the PX to make at FERC.
File a petition with FERC requesting a finding that "no competitive market
currently exists in California, and requesting an extenstion of the price cap
authority..."
Refund immediately to SDG&E consumers the $100 million dollars SDG&E "found"
in an account

Letter to Chair of Energy Oversight Board
Urge ISO to petition FERC for extension of price cap authority
Urge ISO to lower caps to lowest reasonable level
Urge ISO to file petition with FERC for finding that "no competitive market
for energy exists in California"

Letter to Hoecker (cc'd are Clinton, Boxer, Feinstein, Farr, Lewis, Burton,
Brulte, Hertzberg and Baugh)
"...there is virtually no price elasticity in this market, and little
prospect of change in the short run."
If FERC's investigation finds abuse, FERC should order refunds to consumers.


Please send this out tonight to all Enron-Houston Based Employees (Should not include EES).  thanks, Gracie
Signature Service:  The Key To Customer Satisfaction ( Wilson Learning)

Come join us and learn more about what it means to provide Excellent Service!
(2 Classes have been scheduled with 20 slots available for each date.)
October 18-19;    November 1-2
  in EB 560    Cost:  $740.00
8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. (1st day)
8:00 am - 12 noon (2nd day)

Topics Covered Include:
Discovering the Opportunities in Customer Satisfaction
Managing Myself
Opening the Interaction
Determining Needs and Expectations
Managing the Interaction
Satisfying Customers in Comfortable & Indecisive Conditions
Satisfying Customers in the Insistent & Irate Conditions

Please log onto http://elm.enron.com to sign up for the class of your choice.  The class is listed under "By Invitation" Category.   If you have problems registering or have any questions, please call 713-853-0357.


I am away from the office until January 7, 2002.  If you need emergency assistance, please contact Dawn Doucet (403) 974-6724.


Please do.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 10:42 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan
Subject:	RE: CALIFORNIA VIEW - Ability to Extend

We should resurrect Mike Smith's note and get him on the call in the attempt to avoid recreating the wheel on this one.  I can dig it up if you'd like.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	CALIFORNIA VIEW - Ability to Extend
Importance:	High

Sue and Jeff --

I am having a meeting with Vicki and Janet Dietrich on Thursday to discuss our view on the ability to extend our current contracts in CA (for customers already on DA).  Can we discuss this today or soon thereafter.

My take is that the UDCs will be indifferent to this (maybe?) and our #1 priority is to work to get the PG&E model adopted across the state.  Any news on how SCE and SDG&E will move forward?

Thanks.


Thanks a million, Ana Paula, Randy and Sami. Let me know how it goes.

JWVS

	"APG - Ana Paula Gon?alves" <APG@tozzini.com.br>
	05/16/2001 01:38 PM

		 To: <John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com>, <Sami.Arap@enron.com>
		 cc: <daniele.cunha@enron.com>, <randy.pais@enron.com>,
<Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>, "PCS - Paula Corina Santone"
<paula@tozzini.com.br>, "RQB - Renata Siciliano Quartim Barbosa"
<RQB@tozzini.com.br>
		 Subject: Re: Enc.: Labor action filed by Luiz Alexandre Zago against EPCB
and EPE

Privileged and confidential

Dear John:

Thank you for your prompt response regarding the matter.
I have received you mail asking me to call you and I have reached Mr. Randy
Pais.

According to the discussed with him, please be informed that Mr. Arap
Sobrinho  as delegate manager in EPCB articles of association is able to sign
both the company representative letter, as well as the power of attorney to
Tozzini Freire.

It is important to clarify that Ms. Cunha shall be representing EPCB in
court, since the labor action has been filed against both EPCB and EPE and
not SCC.

Unfortunately, these documents have to be filed before court in their
originals. Mr. Pais has requested me to fax me a copy of the signed power of
attorney as soon as I have it.

As regards the correspondence regarding this matter, I am already copying all
of the people mentioned by you.

Should you need any further assistance in connection with the matter, please
advise.

Best regards,
Ana Paula Gon?alves

>>> <John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com> 15/05/01 20:32 >>>

Ana Paula, thanks for keeping after me on this.

We have decided to rely on Ms. Cunha as the company representative to be
present in court. This will avoid the need for an official, court appointed
tramslator. She will be supported by Randy Pais, Nate Neuman or others as
needed either from Houston or traveling to Brazil as needed. The SCC expat
presence in Brazil will be greatly diminished in the next several weeks.

Please copy Ms. Cunha  Mr. Randy Pais and Mr. Richard Sanders on all
correspondence related to this matter. Randy Pais is the internal
transactional lawyer at EEOS/SCC working the Cuiaba project; Richard
Sanders is the internal litigation management lawyer at Enron Wholesale who
supports our business unit.

I want to make sure I understand what is meant by the power of attorney and
company representative letter. Are these the documents that appoint Ms.
Cunha as the SCC company representative for the purposes of this matter?
Sami,  if this is right I would have no objections for you signing these
documents, but you don't have any position with SCC. Weren't these to be
give n to Nate Neuman for him to have executed at the SCC office in Cuiaba?

Ana Paula, is it possible to e-mail or fax the documents to us here, and
for us to signand fax back, or does the court need originals?

JWVS

                    "APG - Ana
                    Paula                To:
<john.schwartzenburg@enron.com>, <randy.pais@enron.com>
                    Gon?alves"           cc:     "PCS - Paula Corina Santone"
<paula@tozzini.com.br>, "RQB -
                    <APG@tozzini.        Renata Siciliano Quartim Barbosa"
<RQB@tozzini.com.br>
                    com.br>              Subject:     Enc.: Labor action
filed by Luiz Alexandre Zago against
                                         EPCB    and EPE
                    05/15/2001
                    06:09 PM

Privileged and confidential

Dear John:

Reference is made to our mail dated as of May 11th, 2001, in order to
inform you that, according to understandings held with Ms. Daniele Cunha,
the power of attorney and the company representative letter related to the
labor action filed by Luiz Alexandre Zago has already been forwarded to Mr.
Sami Arap Sobrinho.

Taking into account the fact that Mr. Arap Sobrinho shall only sign the
above mentioned documents with your express consent, we kindly request you
to contact him regarding the issue, the sooner the possible. In fact, we
will appreciate if you could contact him tomorrow, so that the documents
may be filed at the labor court within the established deadline.

Since Ms. Daniele Cunha shall be functioning as the company representative
at this case, I would like to know if she may be copied of all of the
exchanged mail regarding the matter.

At last, we await your guidance as to whom shall the legal fees billing
related to this case be addressed to.

Best regards,
APG
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 16:48:32 -0300
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?APG=20-=20Ana=20Paula=20Gon=E7alves?="
<APG@tozzini.com.br>
To: <john.schwartzenburg@enron.com>, <randy.pais@enron.com>
Cc: "PCS - Paula Corina Santone" <paula@tozzini.com.br>,     "RQB - Renata
Siciliano Quartim Barbosa" <RQB@tozzini.com.br>
Subject: Labor action filed by Luiz Alexandre Zago against EPCB and EPE
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_DF85E83D.2C4D33DD"

Privileged and confidential

Dear John:

The purpose of this mail is to provide you with the term of the hearing at
court, copy attached hereto, which took place on May 07th, 2001, at the
labor action filed by Luis Alexandre Zago, occasion in which the written
defense has been presented by EPCB, copy also attached hereto.

According to such a hearing term, it has been designated a discovery
hearing at court for May 30th, 2001, at 3 p.m., occasion in which a company
representative of EPCB, with his employee booklet (CTPS), shall attend the
hearing, as well as up to three witnesses  that may be able to testify
favorably to EPCB.

In this sense, below please find the subject over which evidence shall be
produced by EPCB at such a discovery hearing:

i) that EPE hired the Superior Construction Company in order to build the
thermo electric plant;

ii) that the Superior Construction Company has entered into a re-hiring
agreement with the Siemens Ltda. company in order to build the thermo
electric plant, company which, in its turn, has hired the ENESA company for
such a purpose;

iii) that the Superior Construction Company has used EPCB in order to
diligence in the sense that the thermo electric plant building was been
performed in accordance with the hired by and between the EPE and Superior
Company Construction companies;

iv) that the claimant was an employee of the ENESA company; that ENESA
company paid the employee's salaries; that EPE and EPCB have never
contacted the claimant; that the ENESA company was the responsible for the
selection of the professionals that it understood as necessary for the
services compliance; that it was up to ENESA company to give commands to
the claimant; that it was ENESA company that determined  the services to be
performed by the claimant.

We would also like to inform that it has been determined by the court the
deadline of 15 days for EPCB to present at the case files (i) its articles
of associations; (ii) power of attorney and (iii) company representative
letter. For such, we kindly request that such documents, duly certified, be
forwarded directly to our local correspondent attorney in Cuiab? - Ms.
Luciana Cristina Pereira Cardoso, at the address, Av. Historiador Rubens de
Mendon?a, 1836, sala 905, bairro Bosque da Sa?de, Cuiab?, MT, up till May
18th, 2001, so that we may present them at the case files in the stipulated
deadline.

Also, we would like to stress that in case EPCB decides to indicate a
company representative that has not the Portuguese as his mother language
to attend the hearing at court, it will be necessary to request court the
indication of a public sworn translator. Therefore, we kindly request you
to inform us, up till May 21st, 2001, if such will be needed so that we may
take the necessary measures in this regard in time.

We do clarify, however, that we find it unnecessary the attendance of a
foreign company representative in the extent that Ms. Daniele Cunha, who
attended the first hearing at court, has shown enough and necessary
knowledge in order to function as company representative at the present
case.

At last, please advise as to whom shall the legal fees billing related to
this case be addressed to.

Please contact us should you need any further clarification on the above.

Best regards,
Ana Paula Gon?alves.

P.S. Please advise should you need a free translation of both the term of
the hearing, as well as of the written defense presented by EPCB in the
case.

(See attached file: EPE.DOC)
(See attached file: ZAGO.DOC)


Local Public radio over the weekend had a story that Gov Davis, once seen for
dead on the national front, has risen from the dead now that he has gone on
the attack against Bush's energy plan -- I don't agree that he has riden yet,
but that is certainly his plan.

Link is for an Orange County register article that discusses his Gore hires
and notes his Washington strategy.

http://www.ocregister.com/news/howard00520cci.shtml

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


Michelle,

FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001
09:50 AM ---------------------------

Christie Patrick
04/25/2001 07:43 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Dr. Michelle Foss- Energy Institute

Hi Vince--I'll take care of it!

Thanks!  Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001
07:43 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
04/24/2001 05:15 PM
To: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Dr. Michelle Foss- Energy Institute

Christie,

I am forwarding you a message I have received from the University of Houston.
Can you help them? We have a very good relationship with the UoH.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001
05:14 PM ---------------------------

Aisha Jamal <aisha@uh.edu> on 04/23/2001 03:15:29 PM
Please respond to aisha@uh.edu
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com
cc: mmfoss@uh.edu
Subject: Dr. Michelle Foss- Energy Institute

Dear Mr. Kaminski,

I am writing to ask a favor for Dr. Michelle Foss. As you know we will
be running our "New Era" program from May 14- May 25th. Dr. Foss was
wondering if on May 22nd (between 1:30pm and 4:00pm) , we would be able to
bring
our participants for a tour of your trading floor. At this time we will have
30-40 people, and since only 10 people maximum should really be on a
trading floor we need to have 4 companies among which to divide our
participants. At this time, we have a floor from Coral Energy, and are
working with Duke,
and I will be contacting Mr. Paul Roberts to arrange for the Reliant Energy
trading floor. I was hoping very much that you would be able to direct
me to the right person to contact to arrange this tour. Will this be a
possiblity? I really appreciate your help very much. Thank you!

Best Regards,

Aisha Jamal
Energy Institute
713-743-4634


Dear Friend,

Start making money online right now Guaranteed!Look at what you get for only $24.95
? Our exclusive money making internet marketing kit
? Your own cash creating website ready to make money now
? 100% money back guarantee

Check it out at:

http://www.netbizideas.com/money1

Or call 1-800-825-0211 For more info!

You're receiving this email because you signed up at one of the Virtumundo properties (http://virtumundo.com, http://treeloot.com, http://carhunt.com, or http://speedyreward.com).
To unsubscribe from Virtumundo Rewards, please visit http://www.virtumundo.com/unsub/rewardmail/index.html?scott.hendrickson@enron.com
Email delivery powered by Virtumundo's MailCloud technology.


I think Mark got everything in last night.  You may have to have Vol Mgmt
send things through.  Look into it and let me know how it looks.  I will
probably be out of the office on Monday, returning on Tuesday.

D


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL -- ATTORNEY/CLIENT COMMUNICATION

Richard, Elizabeth and Christian:

Attached are memoranda concerning (1) the authority of the City of Vernon's
power buyer to bind the City to a purchase agreement with Enron and (2)
California's Tort Claims Act, which governs all actions against
municipalities in California.  Donn and I look forward to talking with you
tomorrow morning.

Jamie

 <<Memo re authority.DOC>>   <<Memo re tort claims act.DOC>>

E-MAIL NOTICE

This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any review, use,
disclosure or distribution by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply and destroy all copies of the original message.
Thank you.

To reply to our E-mail Administrator directly, send an email to
Postmaster@mdbe.com or call (415) 393-2000 and delete this email.

McCUTCHEN, DOYLE, BROWN & ENERSEN, LLP

http://www.mccutchen.com

 - Memo re authority.DOC
 - Memo re tort claims act.DOC


SBX 6 (Burton), which would establish a public power authority, passed
out of the Senate this morning on concurrence on a party-line vote of
24-14 .   The bill now goes to Governor Davis for signature or veto.

http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx1_6_bill_20010426_amended_
asm.pdf


i tried for the bar and i got shot down, but you can buy me a birthday drink next week.  i am sad.  i would rather work than got to conroe.  i would love to get on a plane and leave and never come back.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:50 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

lets just try for the bar first

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:50 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

ok so let me know what time i need to be at the airport.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:49 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

absolutely

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:48 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

can we go to new york tonight?


Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <stemarie@icubed.com>
Received: from  rly-zc01.mx.aol.com (rly-zc01.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.1]) by
air-zc04.mail.aol.com (v76_r1.23) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 18:11:59 -0400
Received: from  pop3.icubed.com (pop3.icubed.com [208.0.145.4]) by
rly-zc01.mx.aol.com (v76_r1.19) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 18:11:37 -0400
Received: from default (du203p221.icubed.com [204.215.203.221]) by
pop3.icubed.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id e9QMHRT31409; Thu, 26 Oct 2000
18:17:28 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <001201c03f99$e993d620$ddcbd7cc@default>
From: "Pierre-Philippe Ste-Marie" <stemarie@icubed.com>
To: <VKaminski@aol.com>
Cc: "Rick Bryant" <rlbryant@andrew.cmu.edu>
References: <84.a926236.26ed0fa2@aol.com>
Subject: mscf speaker series
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 18:13:02 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300

Dear Mr. Kaminski,

I would like to know at what time you are arriving so I can plan a
"welcoming party" . Depending on your arrival time I will plan a tour of the
school and a short meeting with the staff and the recruiting center. I have
reserved a table for ten at 7.00pm at the Georges Town Hill on Friday the
3rd.

Please inform me of the details of your trip, and let me know If I can be of
further assistance.

Sincerely,

Pierre-Philippe Ste-Marie
--------------------------------------
pstemarie.homestead.com


Sara/Tana, an additional point that we will need to reflect in the documents
is that the optional termination provision should now only be one way, in
favour of ECC, for the first six months, after which time both parties have
the optional right to terminate.  Also, they are now okay with LCs as the
sole collateral (ie. no cash collateral required).  Rick Borden has indicated
that final comments from RBC will be coming out on the documents tonight.
Rick has also confirmed that he will be providing the schedule to the
interest rate swap in short order.

Thanks

Greg


The presentation below identifies the size of the Non-Ferrous metals market.
It was put together by our Corporate Development Team.  As there is no
"authoritative text" for quantifying the market size, our guys had to rely on
several industry publications, consultants and MG employee estimates.

Steel Market Size:
825 million metric tons produced per year (@ an average price of $400 ton),
the physical market size is $330 Billion
Merrill Lynch, in their Steel Report dated April 14, 2000, quantifies the
total steel market at slightly over $800 billion (approx. 1.7 billion tons).
Merrill assumes steel turns over 2 times by the time it reaches the final
consumer.
Steel consumption in the US is 135 million metric tons per year (production
is 105 million metric tons)


We have a month long path LLH PV that has been cut on HE 5 and 6 for Saturday 4/28

The original path is :

TEP@PV-NEVP-CPS-E-SPP-IPC-PAC-SDGE-CISO(T)PVN.GILA/SP15- SDGE@SP15.

HE 5 was cut by 3 MW, HE 6 was cut by 8.  SDGE HAS ASKED TO TAKE THIS TO REAL TIME.

Please call and make sure that everything is going ok on this path SATURDAY.

Thanks,

C


from Neartown President Ed Gonzales:

BTW, thanks to Carmen Druke for taking the time to go!

Amy Barnes

**********************

Community members,

Today (Thursday) the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Prevailing Lot Size Amendment.

The meeting started at 2:30pm and many, many, many agenda items later, just after 6pm(!), it was our turn to step up & speak in favor of the amendment. Talk we did, and I believe we had a good impact.

Thanks to last year's NTA president & Chapter 42 expert, Jack Rose and past east Montrose president, Carmen Druke for being there for NTA.

Also there was Jane Cahill & Billie Mercer from Old Sixth Ward, Theo Fabio and Evalyn Krudy for University Place and BOCA and the president of Southampton CA (didn't get his name).

There were folks there, too, from the Heights, making an altogether well rounded representation of the vitality of the inner-loop.

There's no decision yet from the commission and we'll be watching for that. It was a long grim wait, but it what you have do to gain those little bits that add up to self determination for our neighborhoods and protection and preservation of our communities.

Thanks to everyone that make the effort today.

Ed Gonzales
Neartown Association, 2001 president
713-526-2759        pg713-616-0800
fax713-529-4592   edgonzales@EV1.net <mailto:edgonzales@EV1.net>
1518 Morse, Houston, TX 77019

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


Alan/Jeff:

Just in case you haven't seen it, there is a new paper out from someone at
Berkeley (Steven Puller?) on California market power issues. It seems to
make some pretty strong statements re: market power over the previous years.
If you haven't seen it let me know and I can email you a .pdf version.

All the best,

Seab

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

www.frontier-economics.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan.Comnes@enron.com [mailto:Alan.Comnes@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2000 8:55 PM
To: James.D.Steffes@enron.com
Cc: Mary.Hain@enron.com; Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; smara@enron.com;
Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; Paul.Kaufman@enron.com;
Sarah.Novosel@enron.com; rcarroll@bracepatt.com;
tim.heizenrader@enron.com; tim.belden@enron.com; bob.badeer@enron.com;
Seabron.Adamson@frontier-economics.com;
Sabine.Schnittger@frontier-economics.com
Subject: Emprical Study on High Prices

Attached is a paper that was filed at the FERC by Paul Joskow and Ed Kahn.
I assume it was attached to SCE's comments in the FERC price caps
proceeding.

This study appears to be the most definite analysis so far of the question:
did market fundamentals or generator market power cause the price run-ups
this summer?  Joskow/Kahn conclude that although much of the run up was due
to gas prices and NOx costs, that the market was unworkably competitive;
i.e., the cost run ups do not fully explain the price run ups.  Further,
they provide what they claim is evidence that individual generators
withheld this summer.

Joskow/Kahn state: "Moreover, there is considerable empirical
evidence to support a presumption that the high prices experienced in the
summer of
2000 were the product of deliberate actions on the part of generators or
marketers
controlling the dispatch of generating capacity to withhold supply and
increase market
prices."  Biggest withholders in their analysis are: AES/Williams, Reliant,
and Dynegy

Marketer/traders are largely but not completely spared criticism in their
analysis.  Joskow/Kahn recommend that FERC staff undertake a study of the
entire WSCC data to "Determine the role of marketers in the production and
bidding behavior of the California generators." and to find out more why CA
imports fell.

It will be interesting to see how the CA generators react to this study.

My initial read is that this is will be received as an important,
influential work.  It will fuel the fire for more information release,
especially by the UDCs and CA regulators--at least release of physical
operational data.

I would be interested in your reaction to the study.  In terms of potential
criticisms: I noticed that their gas prices might be low (used monthly
average data rather than daily).  They also did not account for generator
marginal profit or margin recovery to account for possible outages and
noncontiguous schedules.   Finally, they do not examine the benefits that
would have accrued had additional capacity come on line.

Alan Comnes

(See attached file: Joskow Kahn Paper 11_21.pdf)


I'm sure that many of you are aware that there has been a great deal of
activity lately related to Enron's evaluation of possible acquisitions.  John
Goodpasture's group has kept a large number of ET&S people engaged in looking
at a number of potential deals.  While these deal evaluation projects have
become routine around here, we all must remember that these projects are
extremely confidential.  Even after a potential seller has announced that it
is up for sale, the fact that Enron is looking at a potential deal, as well
as any of our internal analysis of the deal, remains strictly confidential.

I realize that many of you have ongoing business relationships with employees
of some of the companies that we have evaluated or may evaluate in the
future.  If you find yourself in such a situation, and a business contact at
the target company asks whether Enron is evaluating the contact's company or
assets, the only appropriate response is that Enron personnel are not
permitted to discuss potential acquisitions.  Please be aware that the
confidentiality agreements that we typically sign as part of the acquisition
evaluation process preclude any communication by Enron people with employees
of the target company.

If you have any questions or concerns regarding this requirement, please do
not hesitate to give me a call.  Thank you for your assistance.
DF


Congratulations, Jeff !

As we discussed briefly in San Antonio,  you asked "How can we not make the
mistakes of the past."   You were referring to projects that did not bring in
the ROI expected.   If you would like to brain storm this issue in the
future, I would be glad to come over and talk.

Thanks,

Dennis Alexander
VP Engineering EECC
3AC-3311
713-646-6174
Email:  Dennis.Alexander@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Dennis Alexander/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 12/13/2000 10:25 AM
-----

	Ken Lay@ENRON
	Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
	12/13/2000 06:01 AM

		 To: All Enron Worldwide
		 cc:
		 Subject: Succession Plan

It is my great pleasure to announce that the Board has accepted my
recommendation to appoint Jeff Skilling as chief executive officer, effective
at the time of their next board meeting on February 12, 2001.  Jeff will also
retain his duties as president and chief operating officer.  I will continue
as chairman of the Board and will remain at Enron, working with Jeff on the
strategic direction of the company and our day-to-day global operations.

Jeff will assume the role at a time when the company is hitting on all
cylinders and is positioned for phenomenal growth.  He is clearly ready for
the job, and after 15 years as CEO of this great company, I,m ready for a
somewhat different role.

Our succession plan has been clear for some time.  This has afforded Jeff and
me the freedom to combine our strengths toward building a company that
continues to exceed everyone,s expectations, including our own.  We look
forward to furthering that relationship as Jeff expands his role.

There are no plans for any other changes in our management team nor broad
shifts in strategy and direction.

Please join me in congratulating Jeff.  I look forward to a great 2001.


[IMAGE]	Fantasy Football Newsletter
  November 16, 2001

     [IMAGE]Fantasy Sports     [IMAGE]Fantasy Football     [IMAGE]CBS SportsLine.com

  Welcome to another edition of the 2001 Fantasy Football Newsletter!      The Fantasy Football newsletter will arrive in your e-mail inbox every Friday. We'll include news about the web site; tips on using all the features available; and answers to your player-related questions from the "Gridiron Guru."   	[IMAGE]	Inside      ? Plan for the Playoffs   ? Game-by-Game Analysis   ? Gridiron Guru   ? Tip of the Week

 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]

    Plan for the Playoffs     The Fantasy season is nearing its end, and the playoffs are on the horizon. For Fantasy 2001 players, the playoffs begin with NFL week 15 (games of Dec. 22-23) and last two weeks, with the championship game in week 16 (games of Dec. 29-30.)  If you're in a Football Commissioner league, go to Schedule, Playoffs to see when your playoffs start and how many rounds they last. Of course, the matchups are probably still not determined, so you may not see teams listed in the brackets. The commissioner of your league is responsible for adding the teams to your playoff brackets at the end of your regular season.  If your team is still in contention, go to NFL Teams, Schedule and take note of the NFL teams with byes during your playoff weeks, so you know which players will be available if - and WHEN - your team competes in a playoff matchup.

    Game-by-Game Analysis     Go to Players, Game Log to see how a particular player did in each game this season. The player's statistics in the common categories will be displayed for each game. If you are breaking down free agents, the game log is great way to see who's been getting the most consistent production.

    Gridiron Guru     Welcome to Gridiron Guru, where we'll answer your questions about players and offer Fantasy Football roster advice. We invite you to send your own scouting reports and comments on players to: gridguru@commissioner.com . You'll get the chance to be heard by thousands of Fantasy players just like yourself!

  Question - Mike Blake     I'm having trouble filling my No. 2 WR spot. Should I start Az-Zahir Hakim, Todd Pinkston or Muhsin Muhammad in week ten?    Answer - GG     Hakim is a hit-or-miss type, so he's risky. Pinkston has done nothing in his last four games, and he's losing playing time to Freddie Mitchell. Muhammad bounced back from a few bad performances to catch six passes for 75 yards last weekend against St. Louis, and has had some past success against this week's opponent, San Francisco. Go with Muhammad.

  Question - Russell Brown     My league starts 2 QBs. Donovan McNabb is one  of my starters. Who else should I start? I have Tom Brady,  Vinny Testaverde and Doug Flutie.    Answer - GG     Testaverde's Fantasy value has taken a real hit this  season because of the Jets' conservative offense. Flutie  struggled last week against a bad Denver secondary, and  won't have an easier time against Oakland. We'd suggest  playing Brady, who will start against St. Louis despite the  return of Drew Bledsoe. Brady has thrown 11 touchdowns in  his last five games, and is playing too well to bench.

  Question - Chris Gilcrest     Who would you start at QB this weekend: Rich  Gannon or Kerry Collins? Which one of these four RBs would  you bench: Eddie George, Michael Pittman, Mike Anderson,  Curtis Martin?     Answer - GG     Collins has the better matchup of the two QBs, but  he's far too inconsistent to start over a player like  Gannon. Oakland will be looking to bounce back from a subpar  performance against Seattle, so look for Gannon to have a  solid game. As for your second question, bench Mike  Anderson. You can't bench Martin, no matter how bad the  matchup may be. George has four touchdowns in his last three  games against Cincinnati, and is worth starting despite his  struggles this season; and Pittman's matchup against Detroit  is too good to ignore.

    Tip of the Week      Keith Simmons, Boulder, CO: Can Terrell Davis ever stay  healthy? He comes back and teases Fantasy owners with his  solid play over the last two weeks, only to fall prey to  another knee injury this past Sunday. He was once the best  Fantasy player in the league, but now Davis is an  unreliable, injury-prone shell of his former self.

  This message has been sent to plove@enron.com, provided free of charge and free of obligation. If you prefer not to receive emails of this nature please send an email to remove@commissioner.com . Do not respond to this email directly.


Rick,

Aram is coming to Houston, in my view, to explore the possibility of coming
back to Enron
(given uncertain situation under the Scottish rule at the old Pacificorp).

I shall suggest that he meet  with you and/or Ted Murphy as well.

I can wait for Karen to come back. It's not urgent. We are still working on
the volumetric  risk module and the team is making a very good progress.
They gave a  presentation today to Rick Carson and me.

We have to decide what comes next  (Asset/Liability Model or
Operational Risk Model).

Vince


just in case you didn't see it- 4 broncos made the 1st team all decade team.
elway is the starter and your boy in sf didn't even make 2nd team tim.


Louise,

A couple of weeks ago we bought an option on four more LM6000's for a Jan02 delivery.  The intent was to sell our 4 July01 machines and recognize approximately $5MM for this "time swap".  We believe that we are in a position to execute this swap (Delta Power is at the table), but during the past two weeks we have received very strong tolling bids (Merrill Lynch, Duke, Constellation) for the LV project that imply a $20MM value to the project but require a commercial operation date of Sep02.  COD of Sep02 requires early turbine delivery.  We are therefore leaning towards canceling the turbine sale/repurchase in order to go for the bigger prize.  It will require finalizing development, EPC contract, tolling agreement, finance plan and internal approvals by May 1.  I am recommending that we go for it.  If we are not able to pull it off, I am confident that the high bids for these machines will still be there.

Chris


please print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000
12:35 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Chris Connelly                           11/05/2000 11:43 AM

To: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Mcquade/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Peter Bradley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jez Peters/LON/ECT@ECT, Candace
Parker/LON/ECT@ECT, Kenny Nicoll/LON/ECT@ECT, Dimitri Taylor/LON/ECT@ECT,
Andy James/EU/Enron@Enron, Cornelia Luptowitsch/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Freight weekly report

Enron Shipping Services Weekly report 43/2000

Highlight
The cape market continues to rise almost daily with RBCT to Rotterdam at
$11.40 and Quennsland to Rotterdam at $15.5 in the spot market.  The driving
factor has not been coal as of late, but an unexpected rush of Iron Ore
cargoes.  On the panamax front, rates have been easing for the last few
weeks, as the expected strong grain activity in the US gulf as not yet
materialised.  The average time charter rate on capes is now in excess of
$25,000 daily and close to $11,000 on panamaxes.  The general view in the
market is that prices for both capes and panamaxes will remain strong though
to April/May 2001 by which time steel mills will have reduced raw material
imports and adversely affected cape rates and the shear number of
newbuildings on the panamax front will drag earnings down as well.  Our group
tends to believe that the balance of the year will see yet firmer rates but
we expect a slow down and a decrease in rates to take effect towards the
first two months of next year as we already are seeing some owners
desperately seeking to cover themselves for next year at very aggressive
numbers ( Hadeed contract ) and we are getting the feeling that Bocimar is
keenly interested to cover their long position even tough their length is
mainly through March/April next year.  Furthernore, the asian owners seem
more and more agressive with rates for next year as their countries are
hitting some rough patches currently, as evidenced by their stock markets and
strong comments against continued strong crude oil prices.

On the ABC front, it appears as if Zodiac and P&O have agreed in principal to
a deal by which Zodiac buys 50% of ABC but gets full control of the company.
Details are still patchy and we are keeping a close eye on the possibility of
Zodiac putting their newly acquired vessels into the Bocimar pool as that
would have a drastic bullish effect on rates for some months to come.  We
have proposed to Bocimar a 5 year collar deal by which we get access to 5
million tons of freight each year with ability to settle the collar deal
against an index and have the ability to call upon physical tonnage each
year.  Furthermore, we would have ability to have a washout clause for each
year by which we would pay a fix lump sum cash amount.   We have also built
in several other options and we are waiting for an answer from Bocimar
sometime next week.  This deal would offer us access to modern vessels at a
price similar to that of the cape index of the last 10 years and with enough
built in options to take advantage of any sudden market changes.

On the logistics front, Coeclerici is coming in next week to make a
presentation on their port handling operations in India/ Indonesia and
Venezuela with the idea of teaming up with us on forthcoming tenders where we
would offer the long term coal contracts into or out of certain ports, as the
case maybe, and they would build and manage the port operations.  They
currently have some interesting contracts in Indonesian ports which should
have special interest to us vis a vis CLP.

Our two cape deals with Coeclerici are still not finalised as we are still
having a few issues with credit language but expect the deals to close within
the next 10 days.

On the EOL front, Andy James has been able to get EDFtrading to trade 225,000
tons of freight via EOL this week and he has added Louis Dreyfus grain and
Billiton and RWE trading to the list of customers that have trading authority
on our system.

Regarding the lighter side of business, Enron dry bulk shipping was featured
in tradewinds, a weekly shipping  newspaper, with 3 pages dedicated to our
rapid growth and clever insights.

Market
	Short term	Medium term	Long Term
Handy Max	Up	Flat	Flat
Panamax	Flat	Down	Down
Cape Size	Up	Up	Flat

Deals Done
Physical Freight
ECS freight
Fixed a panamax for early December loading from Puerto Drummond to LBT

Third parties freight deals
Still negotiating a 6 panamax deal with EDF trading from Richards Bay to Le
Havre for all of next year and looking to sell freight to Preag from KPC to
Rotterdam for similar period.

OTC
FFA s
Very active week in which we transacted with Coeclerici on both Capes and
Panamaxes routes and traded with Jinhui and Conagra on Panaamxes as well.

EOL
Traded 225,000 tons with EDF Trading

Travels
All three of us should be in all week


i don't think our rosters have a good trade match because i'm sure you are
not ready to deal Davis and Robinson. Ricky was my # 1 pick for a reason and
Warrick is the only decent receiver in Cin.  the two guys you are offering
are not top players.


You must have too much time on your hands.  The situation has been corrected.


Tim always tells me EPMI's biggest problem about accessing transmission with
the ISO is the lack of public information.  Tim wants all ISO information -
as he says "more, better, faster."  In other words he wants: meter and outage
information, water levels, bids and schedules, actual flows, transmission
availability and congestion.

Making this information available is necessary for three reasons.  This
information would help the market to police itself and provide better price
signals producing a more efficient market.  It would remove competitive
advantages held by monopsony load servers and generators owning a large
percentage of the generation in the market.  It would also, as Sue points
out, remove the transmission availability knowledge advantage held by the
grandfathered transmission contract holders.

Susan J Mara@EES
09/08/2000 12:06 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@ENRON
cc: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: ANSWERING YOUR QUESTIONS ON CA TRANSMISSION ACCESS

OK.  I'll take a shot in answering your questions, Steve. Others are free to
comment as well.

The transmission issues in the ISO are greatly lessened.  If you talk to the
traders, they LOVE it.  Before April1, 1998, they had no sales to CA.  Now,
they have millions of dollars of sales.  Why?  -- no transmission access to
speak of before the ISO took over.

We still have some problems, however.  The problems have been there since day
one and FERC has punted on them.  We have a huge FERC case dealing with many
of them.  We also appealed a stupid FERC order on Path 15 probably at least a
year ago and have heard nothing from FERC on it. The traders have also
seriously considered a FERC complaint on Path 15.

So, what are the access issues?

Path 15 is the major constraint point between northern and southern CA.  Has
been for years. The transmission fix is basically adding a third intertie
line between Tracy and Tesla. When I left PG&E in 1996, the estimated coast
was $300 million.  The congestion costs did not justify building the line
then.

PG&E continues to control Path 15 and tells the ISO what's left after PG&E
allocates the capacity and decides what the rating is and when it changes.
There is no transparency.  PG&E has the ability to use Path 15 to advantage
Diablo Canyon given the existing contracts.  Carl has looked into it somewhat
and doesn't think PG&E is, but;... The ISO says it can't interpret PG&E's
contracts with the munis and filed some funky thing with FERC about how it's
some kind of overseer -- we protested and have now appealed.  The munis have
been receiving preferential access since Day One -- their contracts were
generally subservient to the IOU rights -- more like interruptible -- but
once the ISO started, all of a sudden, the muni rights became super firm
superceding the IOU rights (as far as we can tell from sketchy filings and
discussions with ISO staff). That's why we have pushed the issue.  Also,
Dynegy and Power Exchange (not the PX) have rights on Path 15.  Tim Belden
would love to get some info on how that constaint is being operated.

Information in general is pretty sketchy on real-time transmission.  We have
complained to the ISO about how the ISO knows what's going on in transmission
(as do the utilities), changes what it does, which then changes prices, and
then doesn't tell us until after the fact.  The ISO has promised to do
better, but I don't think has implemented any real changes yet.

Advantageous access.

Except for what's going on in Path 15, I don't think the IOUs have any
advantages on access -- except with respect to Regulatory Must Run resources
like nuclear and hydro -- but I think it's resource specific, rather than
owner specific. The munis are another story.  See next item.

Munis Preference

This is a huge issue here and I assume across the country.  In making a
devil's bargain with the munis, the FERC has put the ISO into an untenable
situation.  The "sanctity of contracts" under any and all conditions has
created preference for incumbents (not the IOUs -- but everyone who had a
transmission contract with the IOUs) and poor rights for those poor schlepps
like us who have come into the new market.  The ISO cannot operate the system
this way and is forced to give the munis/Dynegy more than they had originally
and to let them do things no one else can do (e.g., some munis get to change
their schedule after the actrive hour begins, some get to do it every half
hour, so far most haven't had to pay for ancillary services, etc.)

There are many, many examples of how we are discriminated against (in
addition to Path 15) and of how FERC has shined us on -- but yet we fight on.
The most recent muni giveaway is the litigation surrounding the "new"
transmission charge for CA -- into this has been entangled the rules for
munis joining the ISO.  The munis want huge handouts to join. And part of the
"new" T rate includes hundreds of millions of subsidies for munis -- I've
pointed out that this amounts to the IOU's customers paying for the munis'
stranded transmission costs, when they are already paying for the IOUs'
stranded generation costs, but this argument fell on deaf ears in the ISO.
It's really not our issue, but it does make you kind of sick about where
public policy stands in this state.

Feel free to call (415) 782-7802

Steven J Kean@ENRON
09/01/2000 07:43 AM
Sent by: Steven J Kean@ENRON
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:

When we have described the problems and solutions for California we have
focussed on generation siting and flexibility to hedge.  We have stayed away
from transmission issues on the assumption that California, with its ISO and
PX, does not suffer from the same discrimination issues as other parts of the
country.  Is this true?  Does California's system layer in priorities for
utility use of the system -- eg doesn't PG&E control "path 15"?  Does that
control provide advantageous access to PG&E?  Are there other examples and
are there links between these "preferences" and the current problems in
California?  As we are trying to convert reliability and pricing concerns
into FERC action these would be helpful arguments to have available to us.


Start Date: 1/2/02; HourAhead hour: 10;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Hi Jeff, attached is the statement of services for Enron for November.  These have previously been sent to Sue Mara.  However, with her departure, it seemed best to send it to you.  As you probably know, our agreement was that the advice letter review service would terminate as of the end of December.  That's why I have been continuing to review the utility filings and send you summaries.  If the bankruptcy filing means something different for this arrangement, please let me know.
Thanks, and I hope you and your family have a wonderful holiday season and a healthy, happy and prosperous 2002!

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com


Due to some Year End work being done we are tentatively rescheduling to Wed
January 3rd.  I will keep you updated on any further changes.

Thanks,
Diana
---------------------- Forwarded by Diana Willigerod/PDX/ECT on 01/02/2001
09:13 AM ---------------------------

Diana Willigerod
01/02/2001 08:48 AM
To: Portland West Desk
cc: Dan Dietrich/CAL/ECT

Subject: Network Update

As most of you know we have been experiencing some problems with our
Network.  Tonight starting at 7:30 Cisco doing some troubleshooting with our
Networking team in Houston.  I have co-ordinated the outages with the Real
Time Schedulers.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns.

Thanks,
Diana


Paul,

We have already finalized Sept. P&L....our deadline was 5 p.m. yesterday.  Therefore, any changes from what was issued yesterday will simply come back to you in a flash adjustment at the end of this month or the following month.  Its possible that price revisions occurred which were not picked up by the download in Enpower.

Thanks.
Casey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thomas, Paul D.
Sent:	Tuesday, October  2, 2001 7:56 AM
To:	Evans, Casey
Subject:	September NE Physical P&L

Casey,
I reconciled my P&L and I am off from your final P&L number for the month.

I am showing a Profit of ~ $596,000 ? however I flowed approx 68,000 MW which would incur a charge of ($136,000).  Therefore my final P&L number should be ~ $460,000.

Your final showed $341,000.

Please give me a call.

Paul
3-0403


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000 08:40 AM -----

	Christi L Nicolay
	09/19/2000 07:06 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, breasoner@gibbs-bruns.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: AEP Protest

This is the draft AEP filing--probably will be filed Wed.  Let me know in the
am if you have comments.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000
06:53 PM ---------------------------

"Susan Buchheit" <sbuchheit@bracepatt.com> on 09/19/2000 02:05:21 PM
To: <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: AEP Protest

** High Priority **

Christi -

Dan asked that I send you the attached updated draft for the AEP Protest
filing.  This draft contains all of Sarah Novosel's input.  Please now show
this draft protest to Kevin Presto and anyone else who needs to sign off on
it.  Thanks.  Please let me know when your group has signed off.

 - 0131341.01


Sheila,

Attached is the edited Master Purchase and Sale document (AKA the "affiliate
document") between PGL/MEH.  Please review and provide comments back PGL's
attorney (Simon Halfin, (email: S.Halfin@pecorp.com, phone # 312-240-4411).
Per Gregg Penman's reccomendation, please coordinate with Kay Mann on who
from Enron is representing MEH on this document.  Gregg and I will be the
commercial point contact for MEH and Dave Wear for PGL/NSG.

Again, once executed  PGL/NSG representative will petition the ICC for the
right to buy and/or sell gas to an affiliate under this master contract.  A
final decision/recommendation needs to be made if this document will be filed
before or with the Hub Agency document.

---------------------- Forwarded by Roy Rodriguez/Corp/Enron on 07/11/2000
01:57 PM ---------------------------

s.halfin@pecorp.com on 07/11/2000 11:35:31 AM
To: roy.rodriguez@enron.com
cc: w.morrow@pecorp.com, r.delara@pecorp.com, d.wear@pecorp.com,
m.klyasheff@pecorp.com, j.nassos@pecorp.com

Subject: Master Natural Gas Contract

Roy:

Attached for MEH's review is a draft Master Natural Gas Contract between
Peoples Gas and MEH.  This draft contract is based on the Master Natural Gas
Contract between Peoples Gas and EMW which was executed on June 30, 2000.
For your convenience, I have attached a compare of the two contracts.  As
you will note, apart from the addition of an ICC approval requirement, most
of the changes are of an editorial nature. Please note that this draft is
still subject to management approval.

Let me know if the form of this document is acceptable to MEH.  If you have
any questions, please call me.

Regards,

Simon Halfin

 <<MEH PGL Master K.doc>>  <<MEH.PGL.compare.doc>>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - MEH PGL Master K.doc
 - MEH.PGL.compare.doc


Dave,

Please work with the folks to make sure this happens ASAP as they need to have access before Monday due to the UBS cutover.

Thanks,

Tom
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 12/11/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,781
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,357
Total Life to Date Transactions	515,690

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 12/11/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	2,932	77%
Enron Europe Limited	171	35%
Global Products	195	36%
Enron Metals	483	15%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	55%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,754,492,066
MTD	30,628,446,748
LTD	309,798,863,793
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	3,411,749,354

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	20,508,644,681

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	603
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	1
Number of Products Offered Today	1,107
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,328
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,963


I have received your e-mail and attachment in good order.  I will return same
to you as soon as possible.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere


I would like to pursue an offer to Mr. Shea prior to the next Executive Committee meeting on May 7, 2001.  Please forward your comments or questions by Tuesday, May 1, 2001 so that I can extend the offer by Wednesday, May 2, 2001.

You will find attached the recommendation letter and his resume.

Regards,

John Lavorato

Tammie Schoppe on behalf of John Lavorato.


FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
03:15 PM ---------------------------

evan@syncrasy.com on 04/12/2001 01:31:37 PM
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com
cc:
Subject: Syncrasy prepares you for the summer

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE]

Syncrasy, LLCv

713.228.8470 Off
713.228.4147 Fax

909 Texas Avenue
Suite 1314
Houston, TX 77002

www.syncrasy.com

Sales:
713.228.4407

Development Offices:
970.247.4139 Off
970.247.7951 Fax

835 Main Avenue
Suite 221
Durango, CO 81301

	Is your Company financially susceptible  to weather fluctuations?

	??????????? [IMAGE]Syncrasy,s Weather Analysis Tool (SWATvwill help.

	Does weather forecast uncertainty  slow the speed
	at which your business makes decisions?

	??????????? [IMAGE]Examine Syncrasy,s application Forecast Analysis and
Confidence Trading System (FACTSv

	How accurate is your current weather information?

	??????????? [IMAGE]Examine Syncrasy,s application Weather Analysis and Vendor
Evaluation System (WAVESv

	?

	How timely is your current weather information?

	??????????? [IMAGE]Examine Syncrasy,s Model Status page.

	?

	SPOT WEATHER ANOMOLIES QUICKLY

	Using Syncrasy's proprietary visualization tools, a user can quickly compare
the output of up to 4 weather forecasting models for a specific time period.
Syncrasy's visualization tool projects each model over an identical national
grid, and a zoom feature allows synchronized zooming into any particular
region of the continental US. For an example, view the Multi-Panel Graphicv
on our website.

	?
	[IMAGE]

	QUANTIFY YOUR WEATHER RISK

	[IMAGE]

	Syncrasy provides individual forecasts for over 1,600 weather stations in the
continental US. For any one of these stations, you can compare all 14 weather
forecasts side-by-side either to gain statistical confidence in a particular
outcome or to quantify the weather risk of a specific forecast.  If you rely
on weather forecasts, you should be aware of the extent to which all 14
forecasts agree (or disagree) with each other. For an example, visit
Syncrasy's  Forecast Analysis and Confidence Trading System (FACTS)v on our
website.

	WHICH WEATHER FORECAST IS MORE ACCURATE?

	Discover which weather forecast has been historically the most accurate for a
particular city over any selected time period (such as last week, month,
season, etc.). Refine your analysis with data filters.  For example, use a
filter to determine which of the weather forecasting models is most accurate
when actual temperatures are greater than 90 degrees, or when temperatures
change more than 10 degrees within an hour.  For an example, see Syncrasy's
Weather Accuracy & Vendor Evaluation System (WAVES)v on our website.

	CONDUCT DETAILED, PRECISE ANALYSES USING "DIFFERENCE GRAPHICS"

	"Difference Graphics" refers to the spatially calculated difference for a
single output. Difference Graphics allows a user to analyze discrepancies
between any 2 weather forecasting models for any time period.  For example,
using Difference Graphics, a user can view the difference in surface
temperature between "Weather Vendor A" and "Weather Vendor B" across the US
for tomorrow at 2pm.  A user could also view how "Weather Vendor A" has
changed since the prior forecast. For an example visit Syncrasy's
Difference Graphics.
	?
	 [IMAGE]

	?

	ENHANCE YOUR WEATHER COMPARISONS TO INCLUDE TRAILING AVERAGES

	The meteorological community frequently relies on one dataset for comparative
purposes: the "30 year average." This "30 year average," however, may not be
an ideal comparison as it is defined as the 30 year average over the period
from 1961 to 1990. Syncrasy broadens the user's information by including
options allowing users to compare any weather forecast to the trailing 30,
15, 10, or 5 year averages.

	A REAL COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: YOU HAVE THE INFORMATION FIRST!

	 [IMAGE]
	?

	Syncrasy's"Mach-5" technique expeditiously reports information to users in
advance of typical weather data feeds which may experience bottlenecks during
peak traffic (or rely on slower satellite communication). To prove Syncrasy's
superior reporting speed, our system allows users to test our reporting speed
for themselves by comparing our time stamps to that of their best alternative
weather data source. Syncrasy records the time at which each weather forecast
is available on Syncrasy's system (timestamp in dark green) as well as the
anticipated time the weather forecast should update (timestamp in black).
Users will find our data reports FIRST offering them a valuable competitive
advantage! For an example, visit Syncrasy's  Model Status.

	Syncrasy,s Weather Analysis Tool (SWATv

	SWATv collects timely and comprehensive  meteorologically diverse weather
forecasts  from multiple forecasting groups, such as National Weather
Service, universities, armed services, NASA and other research oriented
institutions.  The data is integrated into a single analysis platform.  This
platform includes a number of tools which may be useful to a trader and/or
meteorologist.  For example, SWATv assists users in the following tasks:
identifying and quantifying weather risk for some future time period;
tracking the historical performance of different weather forecasting
methodologies; and, creating a proprietary forecast.

	SWATvcurrently collects  14 forecasts covering next hour through 16 days in
the future.  This data (and risk analysis) is available on the SWATvbefore
most companies (especially those companies that depend on traditional
satellite links).  All these weather forecasts can be viewed graphically (as
a national view or hemispheric view, were applicable) or viewed in a tabular
format.

	SWATvFEATURES:

	Compare SWAT features to other products in the marketplace.

	SYNCRASYvis designed for use by:

	    Meteorologists  ????    Power Analysts   ????    Power Traders   ????
Risk Management    ????   Executives

	At Syncrasyvwe believe our system to be the only available service of its
kind. Our research has found no other data source as comprehensive for
statistical analysis of weather forecast performance. As a Subscriber to our
service, you will have use of cutting edge technology at your fingertips. It
is fast, reliable, and easy to use.

	SUBSCRIBE TODAY!    Sales Office  713-228-4407   or    Online at
www.syncrasy.com

	[IMAGE]

	 909 Texas Ave., Suite 1314
	  713.228.8470  Main
	   www.syncrasy.com
	  835 Main Ave., Suite 221
	   970.247.4139 Main
	 Houston, TX  77002
	 713.228.4147  Fax

	Durango, CO  81301
	  970.247.7951 Fax

	 713.228.4407  Sales


I sent you another one - it adresses your views.  I would not add foster.  In fact I would add Lagrasta and Baughman first.  Maybe we should do 35.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Sat 10/13/2001 6:13 PM
To: Lavorato, John
Cc:
Subject: RE: PRIVATE

With Calger leading the likes of Parquet etc they can make $100mm plus - without him no chance.  I think it's sort of indirect p&l.

I think we are close enough I'd put our top 20 above any group - our final ten are really strong too.  Harry, Orlando and Zipper as the last people on our list really does show we have some major talent.

Let's not stick to 30 - let's do 33 putting Miller,Deffner, Foster, Zipper, Ermis and Aucoin in.  Daliney's note shows he is giving a lot to people we have in our second half of the list.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lavorato, John
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 6:01 PM
To: Kitchen, Louise
Subject: RE:

my order is actually future p\l based.  if it wasn't in enron n.a. i would put calger way higher.  ie - if it was pulp and paper and i knew that we wouldn't have the opportunity to trade size, chris would be in the top 3.  Maybe 1.  But in this market we need to have the people who can make over 100 MM every year.  just thinking.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Sat 10/13/2001 11:58 AM
To: Lavorato, John
Cc:
Subject: RE:

I didn't get a copy of Dave's email but a few comments and I attach a compromise ordering.  I added to your file schoolyard.

Our differences are:
Me - Don Miller, Joe Deffner,Chris Foster
You - Zipper, Ermis, Aucoin

I would put them all ahead of Bernie however I have no data points apart from p&l on nothing with Frank so I can't comment on him..  Not huge differences in order, apart from your slant on Canadians!  The main issue with yours is Calger behind Benson and Zufferli (and even maybe Dana), he's a future leader of this organisation.  Your ordering is very P&L based.

Are we supposed to cover Wes or will Causey?

I added to your file schoolyard.

Speak to you later.

Louise

Belden
Arnold
Presto
Shively
Sturm
Swerzbin
Calger
Davis, Dana
Benson
Milnthorp
Zufferli
Herndon
Motley
Davies
martin
grigsby
Tycholiz
Richter
Black
Luce
Allen
Devries
Wiggs
Duran
Storey
Arora
Zipper
Foster
Ermis or Miller
Gonzales

-----Original Message-----
From: Lavorato, John
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 9:56 AM
To: Kitchen, Louise
Subject:

I think we have 3 that are on my list and not on yours.  We have big differences in order.  I'm very concerned about this process.  I'll send you dave's email and you might understand why.

Call me or resend me an email.

john


Mac&Cheese huh?  Eating a light lunch?  When I was at Tech I complained about
the food one day (well actually I complained a lot, but one day I made an
official complaint).  Anyway I was telling the guy over the food service that
the food was overpriced and the quality was pathetic.  And he told me they
were actually losing money.  All I had to say to that was if you can charge
$6.50 for Beanie Weenies (actual price of an actual dish passed off as an
entree)  and lose money you must be the worst businessman in the history of
the world.  I don't think he appreiciated me sharing my opinion with him.


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<title>VentureWire People</title>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1">

	Published by Technologic Partners

    EXECUTIVE CHANGES FOR  Tuesday, September 04, 2001

WHO'S HIRING

TopicalNet of Woburn, Mass.
By Giselle Greenwood
After inking a European distribution deal with Bertelsmann and acquiring Internet Profiles (I/Pro), TopicalNet, a provider of automated content classification technology for B2B applications, is looking to add senior sales people, including a senior vice president of sales and and a SVP for its applications group.

CEO Ray Kingman says the company's technology was significantly expanded after the acquisition of I/Pro, a provider of Web site measurement, advanced customer analytics, and online audit services, even though the company hasn't commercially launched its products yet.>>

EXECUTIVE SEARCHES
• MANAGING GENERAL PARTNER-BAY AREA OR NYC-BOS CORRIDOR
• VICE PRESIDENT CUSTOMER ENGINEERING (PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)-S. SAN FRANCISCO

        		CEO HIRES

        		LINKS

        		• sponsor VentureWire people

    			• place a classified ad

    		• refer VentureWire

    		• send news

    		• FAQ

    		YOUR ACCOUNT

    		• change e-mail

    		• cancel VentureWire people

    		• feedback

    		• this newsletter
  mailed to you at:
 jdasovic@ENRON.COM

    		SERVICES

    		• VentureWire index

    		UPCOMING EVENTS

    		• Outlook Conferences

    		Venture Capital community and industry executives come together!

		San Francisco
September 10 & 11

TOP MANAGEMENT

• AccessLan Names Ofer Doitel President and CEO

• Aviva Biosciences Names Peter Wilding President and CEO

VC PERSONNEL

• Bush to Nominate Founder of Trident Capital as Envoy to EU

• PwC Venture Partners Adds Michael Jonovski to Team

MARKETING & SALES

• Racemi Names RF Solutions CEO Steve Richeson as Mrktg. VP

OPERATIONS

• Peace Software Names Derek Van Keuren as HR Vice President

	TOP MANAGEMENT

• AccessLan Names Ofer Doitel President and CEO

SAN JOSE, CALIF.      -- AccessLan Communications, which provides IP-enabled access provisioning, announced its appointment of founder and chairman, Ofer Doital, as president and CEO.

Mr. Doital, who also continues as chairman, replaces Michael Pisterzi, who has stepped down from the company.

The company's board members are Peter Cross, business and engineering advisor to AccessLan and formerly senior vice president of engineering at Bay Networks; Sean Dalton, general partner at Highland Capital; Bob Hower, partner at BancBoston Ventures; and Andrew Ludwick, business adviser to AccessLan, co-founder of SynOptics, and formerly president and CEO of Bay Networks/SynOptics.

AccessLan has raised over $90 million in financing from  Accel Partners, Advanced Fibre
Communications, AV Labs, BancBoston Ventures, Berkeley International Capital, Highland Capital, The Ignite Group, Intel Capital, NIF Ventures, Peery Capital, Sequoia Capital, and Tudor Private Equity Fund.

http://www.accesslan.com

• Aviva Biosciences Names Peter Wilding President and CEO

SAN DIEGO -- Aviva Biosciences, a developer of active biochips with an emphasis on on-chip bioanalyte manipulation and screening, said it has appointed board member Peter Wilding as president and CEO. Mr. Wilding previously served as co-founder of ChemCore, a biochip company that was acquired by Caliper Technologies.

Mr. Wilding replaces co-founder Julian Yuan as president and CEO. Mr. Yuan, who invested in the company's Series A round, assumes the post of vice chairman.

Aviva Biosciences existing board members are Jing Cheng, co-founder of AVIVA Bioscience, professor at the Tsinghua University School of Life Sciences & Engineering, and research director at the Beijing National Biochip Research and Engineering Center; Charles H. Sie, chairman and former
vice president of the corporate engineering center's West coast site at Xerox; Mr. Yuan; and John Yu, first vice president and general manager of the technology department at China Development Industrial Bank.

Founded in 1999, Aviva Biosciences raised $5 million in Series A funding from China Development Industrial Bank, WI Harper, private equity firm Zimmerman, and Mr. Yuan.

http://www.avivabio.com

VC PERSONNEL

• Bush to Nominate Founder of Trident Capital as Envoy to EU

WASHINGTON -- President Bush is expected to nominate Rockwell Schnabel, founder and managing director of Trident Capital, as the U.S. envoy to the European Union (EU), according to Mr. Schnabel.

Mr. Schnabel said that, if his nomination was approved, he would expect to be away from Trident Capital until the end of the Bush administration, though he would remain a special limited partner. He said he was not sure whether he would return to the venture capital firm afterward.

Mr. Schnabel's four board seats at portfolio companies have been distributed to other partners in the firm over the last six months.

Prior to founding Trident Capital, Mr. Schnabel served as acting secretary of commerce and the deputy secretary of commerce during the Bush administration,
and as the U.S. ambassador to Finland during the Reagan administration.

Trident Capital manages more than $1.4 billion.

http://www.tridentcap.com

• PwC Venture Partners Adds Michael Jonovski to Team

LONDON -- PricewaterhouseCoopers Venture Partners (PwCVP), a seed- to early-stage venture capital firm that invests in business-to-business and life sciences companies, said it appointed Michael Jonovski, former assistant director in corporate finance practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers, as an investment director in its U.K. division. He is the ninth PwCVP venture partner.

PwCVP is led by CEO Jonathan Wackett and Gerry Devlin, managing director and founder. Formerly called Pricewaterhouse Incubator, the firm has made five investments since March 2000, and its portfolio includes Cataloga, First Professional, F-Exchange, and Speedclear.

http://www.pwcglobal.com

MARKETING & SALES

• Racemi Names RF Solutions CEO Steve Richeson as Mrktg. VP

ATLANTA -- Racemi, a provider of server architecture for enterprise and service provider data centers, said it named Steve Richeson as vice president of marketing. Mr. Richeson previously served as CEO of RF Solutions. Racemi has received seed funds from 5 Paces Ventures.

http://www.racemi.com

OPERATIONS

• Peace Software Names Derek Van Keuren as HR Vice President

MIAMI -- Peace Software, a provider of customer management technology for utilities and retail energy companies, said it named Derek Van Keuren as vice president of human resources. Mr. Van Keuren previously served as vice president of human resources at Forums Communications. Peace Software's investors include Insight Capital Partners and Kinetic Ventures.

http://www.peace.com

EXECUTIVE SEARCHES

Managing General Partner--Venture Capital--Bay Area or NYC-BOS corridor

New Fund in formation seeks a Managing General Partner (MGP) with at least 10 years experience as a venture capitalist. The MGP will lead a small team already in place. The goal of the Fund is to capitalize on the outsourcing trend, initially through making investments in attractive early to mid stage U.S. based technology companies whose growth might be enhanced by the Fund's Indian technology services partners. A candidate must have a demonstrably successful track record in venture capital/private equity investments and should currently be a general partner in a VC fund.

compensation: consistent with industry practice

e-mail: box1181@venturewire.com
company: n/a
[top]

Vice President Customer Engineering (Professional Services)--Software--S. San Francisco

The Vice President of Customer Engineering will be responsible for providing the leadership and management of the company's services efforts. The Vice President of Customer Engineering and Services will directly manage and lead an experienced, technically strong staff of which includes Professional Services, Technical Support and Educational Services.

Please see website for complete description.

Requirements:

*	Minimum of ten years managing Professional Services, particularly focused on the Enterprise, working with major Global 2000 businesses.

*	Experience building and leading Professional Services, Technical Support and Training Organizations

*	Experience in managing at least 10 concurrent projects.

*	5 years of experience managing teams in excess of at least 65 people.

*	Exceptional executive leadership manifested through organizing and motivating teams toward their respective goals by employing hands on management.

*	Responsibilities including recruiting, budgeting, and reporting.

e-mail: molly@modeln.com
company: Model N
[top]

To cancel, change, or update your subscription:

http://people.venturewire.com/account.asp


Attached is the agreement with my revisions.


----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 02:55 PM -----

	jennifer-gillaspie@reliantenergy.com
	04/10/2001 02:34 PM

		 To: Eric.Gillaspie@enron.com, jgillaspieci3@netzero.net,
gerald.nemec@enron.com
		 cc: djunk_epc@yahoo.com, gejunk@yahoo.com, hjunk@hotmail.com
		 Subject: China Itinerary

Confirmation # iwj7tt

June 4
7:15 a.m. depart Houston to Detroit
Northwest flight 1888
11:17 arrive Detroit
12:30 depart Detroit to Shanghai
Northwest flight 89
3:10 p.m. on June 5 arrive Shanghai

June 16
9:40 a.m. depart Beijing to Tokyo
Northwest flight 12
2:20 p.m. arrive Tokyo
3:50 p.m. depart Tokyo to Houston
Continental flight 6
2 p.m. on June 16 arrive Houston