The flyer didn't come through - do you have a copy?

Janice R Moore
01/17/2000 11:19 AM
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: E-Commerce Boot Camp

Do you think we could get enough value out of this to warrant $2300?
---------------------- Forwarded by Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT on 17.01.2000
11:18 ---------------------------

"Eric Sedlak" <eric.sedlak@dgj.com> on 15.01.2000 00:21:38
Please respond to "Eric Sedlak" <eric.sedlak@dgj.com>
To:
cc:  (bcc: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT)
Subject: E-Commerce Boot Camp

Enclosed is a flyer regarding E-Commerce Boot Camp in SF.  To preserve the
confidentiality of the identities of our clients, we have addressed this
e-mail to bcc's.

Please contact me or Caroline Mead in our San Francisco office should you
require any further information or wish to send a representative.

Eric W. Sedlak
Deacons Graham & James
6 Battery Road #22-00
Singapore 049909
Tel: 65-224-7787
Fax: 65-224-7328
E-Mail: eric.sedlak@dgj.com
Website: www.dgj.com

This message is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please delete the message from your computer
and notify the sender by return.
 - att1.htm


Hi Kay. Can you please forward the faxed invoice you received to Sheila
Tweed. I believe she may have some insight on this invoice, the due date was
6/18/2000. Per Brian Barto it is ok to pay this invoice but we need someone
in Legal to review and give the ok to pay.

Thanks-

Tonya

Tonya Dennis
Specialist- Reporting & Analysis
Enron -North America
713-345-3775
tonya.dennis@enron.com


Vince:

Attached please find my resume.

Thanks,

Ding
6-7072


NEAL, SCOTT M,

You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed by Friday, June 1, 2001.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

Employee Name:
CARTER, TAMARA
CHAVEZ, ALEJANDRA
DE PAOLIS, TAMMI
DEMOES, THOMAS
HODGE, JEFFREY
JONES, DAVID
KAISER, JARED
KEISER, KAM
KNIPPA, MARK
LAMADRID, VICTOR
MARTIN, THOMAS
MAY, LAWRENCE
MUHL, GIL
OTTO, CHARLES
ROBERTS JR, MICHAEL
SUPERTY, ROBERT
TAYLOR, JOHN
TIAN, YUAN


Shirley,

Any conflict?

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2000
12:50 PM ---------------------------

Stinson Gibner
01/17/2000 09:57 AM
To: Thomas D Gros/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jean Mrha/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ravi
Thuraisingham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samer Takriti/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Jones/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Amit's visit

Amit planning to spend the day of February 16th at Enron in order to give an
update on his bandwidth pricing research.    We will also try to spend some
time in more of a round-table discussion designed pick his brain on any other
related issues on which he may be able to help us.   I am corresponding with
Amit to set up a more detailed agenda.    Please let me know if there are
conflicts which should lead us to choose a different date.

Regards,
--Stinson


Leslie:  Can you attend this meeting for me?  I will be in London.

Patti:  Can you get time and location for Leslie and let them know that she
will be there instead of me?  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001 10:14 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca Miles @ ENRON                           01/12/2001 10:28 AM

To: Melissa Allen/LON/ECT@ECT, Beth Apollo/LON/ECT@ECT, Caroline
Lothian/LON/ECT@ECT, John Paskin/LON/ECT@ECT, Donald Miller/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David O'Dell/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Biren Kumar/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Matthew Huddleston/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve Frazier/HOU/EES@EES,
Greg Lewis/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Elise Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allen W
Ueckert/NA/Enron@Enron, Thao Nguyen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Gillespie/Corp/Enron, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Britton/LON/ECT@ECT, Jo Ann Hill/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Elaine Schield/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: ISC ORG LEADERSHIP, ISC ORG SOLUTION MANAGERS, Richard
Priska/NA/Enron@Enron, Margarite Cunningham/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allan
Sommer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Regina Karsolich/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Agenda for SAP Optimization Meeting -- Wednesday, Jan. 17

Attached is the agenda for the SAP Optimization Kick-Off meeting.  The
following handouts will be provided at the meeting:

ISC Organization Chart
ISC Solution Manager Bios
Template for business area 2001 SAP goals
Revised SLA
Copy of Remedy Report
Copy of Maximize Dashboard
Customer Relations presentation

Please feel free to contact Rich Priska (x56069) or me with any questions.
Please RSVP to Margarite Cunningham (x56130).

Thank you,
Rebecca
x56364


The ENA Estate Group meeting will be held today at 1:00 pm in ECS 05990.

I look forward to seeing you at the meeting.


What are you planning on doing with them?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 03/25/2001 10:30 AM -----

	"Hollingsworth, Jarvis V." <JHollingsworth@brobeck.com>
	03/23/2001 04:47 PM

		 To: "'Blaine, Michelle'" <Michelle.Blaine@ENRON.com>, "Brownfeld, Gail"
<Gail.Brownfeld@ENRON.com>, "Williams, Robert C."
<Robert.C.Williams@ENRON.com>, "Sanders, Richard"
<Richard.B.Sanders@ENRON.com>
		 cc: "Long, Sean" <Sean.Long@ENRON.com>, "Zager, Steve" <SZager@brobeck.com>
		 Subject: April 3  Meeting

Robert:
As you recall, Steve Zager and I were going to be in Houston on April 3.
This is just a followup to our previous emails regarding everyone's
availability on that day.  Let me know.  Thanks.......Jarvis

Jarvis V. Hollingsworth
Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP
4801 Plaza on the Lake
Austin, TX  78746
512.330.4087
512.633.7091(cell)
512.330-4001 Fax
jhollingsworth@brobeck.com

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


The report named: East VaR Estimate <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=27&report_name=East+VaR+Estimate&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/19/2001>, published as of 11/19/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Start Date: 1/27/02; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012724.txt


Let's stick with what we already have on order.  Is Frank ready to start
Phase III as soon as Phase II is done?

	Joya Davis
	07/10/2000 09:16 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Private Office Pricing

Here's the info you requested regarding office furniture.

Joya' F. Davis
Sr. Admin. Assistant
ENA Legal Department
EB3855A
joya.davis@enron.com
(713) 853-9559 DID
(713) 646-4842 FAX

----- Forwarded by Joya Davis/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 09:15 AM -----

	Reggie Wilson
	07/10/2000 08:32 AM

		 To: Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Private Office Pricing

Joya,
Here's a break down of the Wooden Private Office "E" station (Cherry Wood)
vs. the Laminate Private Office "E" station (Off white laminate). All quotes
are approximate and based on reusing our existing inventory, if available.
Lead-time for both is approximately 3-5 weeks based on quantities.

Wooden Private Office "E" Station = $2100. each

Laminate Private Office "E" Station = $750. each

Feel free to call me if there are questions.

Thanks,
Reggie


done

Jackie Young
12/21/2000 09:08 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Deal extension for 11/21/2000 for 98-439

Hi Daren,

I know that this is a busy part of the day for you.  But, when you get a
minute, can you please extend deal #465322 for cover a flow volume of 140
dec. for 11/21/2000?

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 09:06
AM ---------------------------

Jackie Young
12/19/2000 09:30 AM
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Deal extension for 11/21/2000 for 98-439

Typo............Deal #462490

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           12/19/2000 09:24 AM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn
Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Deal extension for 11/21/2000 for 98-439

Jackie, 465490 is not a deal between ENA and HPL.. It is a Zone 5 Tennessee
sale between ENA and a third party...Thanks

Jackie Young
12/19/2000 09:02 AM
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn
Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Deal extension for 11/21/2000 for 98-439

Victor,

Can you extend deal #465490 to cover a flow volume of 141 dec. for 11/21/2000?

Daren,

Can you extend deal #465322 for cover a flow volume of 140 dec. for
11/21/2000?

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


Uncle Clark,

How are things?  I hope this note finds you well.  I wanted to see if you
were going to be in town for the weekend of November 11th.  I plan on
bringing the whole group up for the KU-UT game that weekend.  I can't believe
it has almost been 4 years since we last visited up there.  We are doing well
here in Houston.  Everyone is getting ready for the school year.  In fact,
Kristi has already started back.  The kids begin on the 9th.  Enron still
seems to monopolize my time.  But it's a great place to work.  Let me know
about that weekend.  I hope you will be in town as  I am looking forward to
seeing you all.

DG


The following is a summary of the attached Edison prehearing conference
statement filed this afternoon in the proceeding dealing with its Petition
for  Modification of the end-of-the-rate-freeze decisions:
?
Edison says there are There are four key elements to managing the  situation:

Support market reform, including providing greater freedom for  utilities
to contract for longer term supplies of power, completing review  of SCE,s
bilateral contract proposals, and urging other agencies to help  rectify the
market structure problems that have become apparent.
Confirm that the utilities will be permitted to recover their  reasonable
procurement costs incurred on behalf of customers.
Protect customers by implementing a post-freeze rate stabilization  plan
instead of the current plan which directs immediate pass through  of
volatile wholesale power costs. This should include a modest  near-term
energy rate increase of around 10% in the interest of avoiding a  much larger
rate
increase in 2002 and thereafter.
Promptly decide whether the Commission is going to permit the sale  of
the utilities, remaining generation assets. If the answer is &no,8  then
fundamental changes in the implementation of electric  restructuring
would have to be considered. Either way, all parties need  the
Commission,s answer to this key question as soon as possible.

Interestingly, Edison says that, "Based on the valuations SCE has filed for
our hydro facilities, Palo Verde, Mohave and Four Corners (no one has argued
that these valuations are too high), our stranded costs (for the purpose of
Section 368(a)) were recovered no later than
mid-August  2000. The Commission should approve our pending plant valuations
as  soon as possible so that the Commission can put in place a reasonable
ratestabilization plan, including a modest energy rate increase beginning in
January 2001, to deal with the necessary costs of procuring power."
[emphasis  added]
?
The procedural schedule proposed by Edison is as follows:

Prehearing Conference October 27, 2000
Comments on the SCE and PG&E Petitions to Modify due October 30,  2000
End of rate freeze tariffs and rate stabilization plan filed November 14,
2000
Briefs on sale of remaining utility generation assets. November 17,  2000
Decision on SCE and PG&E petitions to modify November 21, 2000
Comments on end of rate freeze tariffs and rate stabilization plans due
November 27, 2000
Reply Comments due December 4, 2000
Proposed Decision issued December 14, 2000
En Banc Oral Argument December 20, 2000
Special Commission meeting (Decision adopting end of rate freeze tariffs  and
rate stabilization plans) December 28, 2000
New rates effective as of: January 1, 2001

 - PHC STATEMENT-SCE_1.PDF


Joaner Boner -
Well, in my usual slacker fashion, I haven't bought my plane ticket yet - so
I totally think you should go to Sunriver. I might come visit you there if
there's room. But an S.F. visit is imminent, I swear. I'll call you soon to
discuss the alcoholism of your co-worker/boyfriend, as well as the techniques
for acquiring this sexy body for the new year. Work is consuming my life and
eating me whole - very chaotic what with hiding all the power from you guys
and whatnot. Imagine the pressure. Another reason it might not be the best
time for me to come is that I'm moving on Friday. Amber and Molly and I found
a big, beautiful house in NE, near Grant High - it's kickass. But it's sucked
away all of my money and will probably take over every free moment for the
next month just to get it set up. If you want, you should stop by for a sleep
over on your way to Bend. We'll throw a party. And what's up with the wrist
disease? Are you not taking your calcium or something? I'm convinced that
these wacky desk jobs are aging us youthful beauties prematurely. At least
that's the excuse I like to give when I come in to work looking like I just
bathed in a life-sized ashtray. Call me soon - I'm really curious to find out
why Brooks is doing the chicken dance EVER let alone in your room in the
middle of the night. Wheeew!

Happy Sexy Body New Year,
Kate
503.819.2181

jharold@Advent.COM on 01/23/2001 04:19:49 PM
To: Kate.Symes@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Sexy Body for the New Year!!!

Hey Kate -
My subject line is a duplicate of an email I received this morning from some
beauty .com site.  Steve Cross puts me on all of these stupid mailing lists,
so I thought I'd be retarded and put that in my subject line because it's a
stupid subject!

Anyway, how are you doing these days?  I wanted to write and see if you
really got your ticket to come visit over President's Day weekend!  I
totally want you to come down!!!  I'd be so excited.  If you don't, though,
I think I'm going to look into going up to Bend for the weekend to chill in
SunRiver and snowboard a little!  Maybe you could meet me there and stay w/
me at my parents house?  Ash is going up for sure.  If you're coming down
here, that's GREAT!  I'd be SOOO excited.

I'm on complete crack today, if you can't tell.  I have carpal tunnell, too.
Last night I woke up at 2am to Brooks coming home from a drunken night out
and he started doing the chicken dance in my room and almost knocked over my
entire shelf, tv, etc.  Then he started babbling about nothing, passed
straight out and started totally snoring.  So I didn't get back to sleep
until like 4:30 and had to wake up at 6.  I was livid this morning.  I'm
such a bitch, but I need my sleep!  Dammit.

Anyway, write soon!   I miss you!
joan

Joan Harold
Business Analyst
Advent Software, Inc.
SubscriberRequests@Advent.com

For more information on Subscriber
Services please click below:
http://gate.advent.com/ecg/ECG%20Divisions/SubscribeServ/SubServ_home.htm


Please include pthompson@akllp.com and ccobb@akllp.com on the email with dial
in instructions.  thanks,  Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/22/2000 04:59
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           12/22/2000 04:22 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com @ ENRON, david.onuschek@us.abb.com, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shelby Malkemes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lorie Leigh/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Wednesday, Dec 27 11AM CST Conference Call

All:

Please plan to participate in a conference call on Wednesday, Dec. 27 at 11AM
CST to discuss the breakout contract for the transformers.

Mike / Dave:

It would be extremely helpful to have comments back on the proposed form of
agreement provided to you earlier by Kay before this conference call. Please
forward your comments to the e-mail group listed above.

Shelby / Lorie:

Please set up a call in number and distribute the call in info to the e-mail
group listed above.

Thanks much everybody. Have a happy and safe holiday. Aloha!

Ben


This is what we sent to prospective partner.

Same password as one we sent to other lot Sunday. We deleted yours, John's and 4 others from it as per Muller/Whalley.

David
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Broussard, Tharsilla
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:17 PM
To:	'john.l.donnelly@ssmb.com'
Cc:	Oxley, David
Subject:	Requested Document

Attached is the requested document excluding data on John Arnold, Lousie Kitchen, Greg Whalley, Kevin Presto, Jay Webb, Philip Allen, and John Lavorato.  Please call David Oxley at 713-853-3557 with any questions.


Hightlighted word? Your message is a little cryptic; so I'm not quite sure
what you want me to explain. As for lunch, I just returned. It was delicious,
thank you.


I cannot play on Thursday but thanks for letting me know.  Could you check with Steve and his wife for their availability on Sunday.  I emailed him but wanted to make sure he got it.  Thanks.

TGBOLDIG@aol.com on 05/22/2001 05:42:37 PM
To:	<cegann@dow.com>, <Stanley.Horton@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:	Golf Thursday

We have a 9:00 tee time Old Course

Tom


We need to add TGPL meter 52-1087 to deal 895951.  We have some swing gas for May that we need to allocate.

Thanks,
Megan


Dear Friends,

President-elect Bush has brought together an excellent group to serve as his
Cabinet.  His nominees are a diverse, experienced, and strong group.  They
will help enact his agenda, change the tone in Washington and make us proud.

Your help is needed to get these outstanding men and women confirmed by the
United States Senate.  Some of President-elect Bush's nominees are being
unfairly attacked by outside groups and the Senate needs to hear that from
you.

One of the first Senate hearings will be Tuesday for Senator John Ashcroft,
President-elect Bush's choice for Attorney General.

The hallmark of Senator Ashcroft's long history of public service has been
integrity.  As Attorney General, he will uphold the law and make the
Department of Justice an institution all Americans can be proud of.

He brings a unique record of service to this challenge.  He was twice
elected Missouri's Attorney General, serving with both Republican and
Democrat Governors.  He was elected Governor of Missouri, an important swing
state, and then reelected with 64% of the vote.  John then was elected to
the U.S. Senate, where he just finished a six-year term.  No other Attorney
General has ever had this wealth of experience.

John has a long history of strong leadership on important issues, including:

- Won widespread acclaim for his effectiveness in running the Missouri
Attorney General's office by attracting strong men and women to serve his
state and strictly upholding the law
- As Senator, co-Sponsored the Violence Against Women Act
- As Governor, signed Missouri's first Hate-Crimes Bill and fought to
protect victims' rights
- Balanced the State Budget all eight years As Governor
- Made Education Reform a priority as Governor
- Toughened penalties for crimes committed with a Gun
- Worked To protect children at school, strengthen classroom safety
- Voted For background checks at pawn shops
- Was Endorsed By Missouri Law Enforcement Agencies
- Supported 26 of 28 African-Americans nominated to the Federal bench
- Was commended as Governor by one of the oldest Black Bar Associations for
his record of appointing minorities
- Appointed many African-Americans to Missouri's courts
- Was one of the first Governors to sign a law creating a Martin Luther King
holiday
- Created an award honoring George Washington Carver's Accomplishments,
saved Lincoln College, an historic Black college founded by African-American
veterans of the Civil War.

Some groups are attacking Ashcroft for opposing the nomination of Judge
Ronnie White to a lifetime appointment as a Federal judge. Every Republican
Senator opposed White's confirmation, in part, because he urged a lower
legal standard for a man convicted of first-degree murder 4 times (including
the first degree murder of three police officers).

Some groups charge Ashcroft will not uphold abortion laws with which he
disagrees.  This is wrong and simply an attempt to undermine the new
Administration.  Ashcroft understands the job of the Attorney General is to
carry out the letter of the law.   He will restore the rule of law to the
Justice Department and run a highly professional department.

Please do two things.

First, let your Senator know you strongly support a fair confirmation
process for John Ashcroft.

Go to http://www.senate.gov/senators/senator_by_state.cfm to find the
contact information for the Senators from your state.

Second, let the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee know you support
John Ashcroft's confirmation.  The committee begins its hearings Tuesday.
Its members are: http://www.senate.gov/~judiciary/members.htm

D(DE) Biden Jr, Joseph, (202) 224-5042, senator@biden.senate.gov
R(OH) DeWine, Mike, (202) 224-2315,
http://www.senate.gov/~dewine/request_form.html
D(WI) Feingold, Russell, (202) 224-5323, russell_feingold@feingold.senate.gov
D(CA) Feinstein, Dianne, (202) 224-3841, senator@feinstein.senate.gov
R(IA) Grassley, Chuck,, (202) 224-3744, http://grassley.senate.gov/webform.htm
R(UT) Hatch, Orrin, (202) 224-5251, senator_hatch@hatch.senate.gov
D(MA) Kennedy, Edward, (202) 224-4543, senator@kennedy.senate.gov
D(WI) Kohl, Herb, (202) 224-5653, senator_kohl@kohl.senate.gov
R(AZ) Kyl, Jon, (202) 224-4521, info@kyl.senate.gov
D(VT) Leahy, Patrick, (202) 224-4242, senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov
D(NY) Schumer, Charles, (202) 224-6542, senator@schumer.senate.gov
R(AL) Sessions, Jeff, (202) 224-4124, senator@sessions.senate.gov
R(NH) Smith, Bob, (202) 224-2841, opinion@smith.senate.gov
R(PA) Specter, Arlen, (202) 224-4254, http://specter.senate.gov/webform.htm
R(SC) Thurmond, Strom, (202) 224-5972, senator@thurmond.senate.gov
D(NJ) Torricelli, Robert, (202) 224-3224
senator_torricelli@torricelli.senate.gov

Finally, two recent comments from current United States Senators:

Senator Robert Torricelli (D-NJ) had this to say about the Ashcroft
nomination:

"'I think it represents a very good choice'. . . the only things people want
in an attorney general are 'good management, sound judgment and high
integrity.  They're not easy to find in one individual, but I think John
Ashcroft has all of them.'"  "I certainly assume I will be voting for
him."  - Sen. Robert Torricelli (D-NJ) (David Kocieniewski, "Staunch Democrat
Eases Up on Opposition," The New York Times, January 6, 2001; Audrey Hudson,
"Democrats Set For Ashcroft's Confirmation," The Washington Times, January
4, 2001) (emphasis added)

Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND) Commended Ashcroft.

"I rise to pay tribute to Senator John Ashcroft as he prepares to leave the
Senate. . . . Senator Ashcroft has been a man of his word who served his
state and his country with distinction.  I join my colleagues on both sides
of the aisle in wishing him well in his future endeavors."  (Congressional
Record, December 15, 2000)

Thank you.

(Please forward this message to friends, family and co-workers and ask them
to show their support for President-elect Bush by asking their U.S. Senators
to support the confirmation of John Ashcroft)

______________________________________________

Paid for by the Republican National Committee.

If you wish to unsubscribe from the eChampion mailing list, simply click
here:

http://mail.echampions2000.com/GoNow/a14064a29164a56615396a0

To become an eChampion click here:

http://mail.echampions2000.com/GoNow/a14064a29164a56615396a1


Here are some unsolicited pics of the house.

Yeah, as it works out, I'm going to take the whole week off just to do it
all right.  Plus, not like we can afford vactation this year anyways.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ebner, Daniel
> Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 1:29 PM
> To: 'SP5297@txmail.sbc.com'
> Subject:
>
>  <<P8080013.JPG>>  <<P8080012.JPG>>  <<P8080003.JPG>>  <<P8080009.JPG>>
> <<P8080001.JPG>>  <<P8080002.JPG>>  <<P8080005.JPG>>  <<P8080007.JPG>>
> <<P8080008.JPG>>  <<P8080010.JPG>>  <<P8080011.JPG>>
>
> Daniel Ebner
> D/FW Development - JPI
> 972-556-6915
> mailto:DEbner@JPI.com
> http://www.jpi.com
>

 - P8080013.JPG
 - P8080012.JPG
 - P8080003.JPG
 - P8080009.JPG
 - P8080001.JPG
 - P8080002.JPG
 - P8080005.JPG
 - P8080007.JPG
 - P8080008.JPG
 - P8080010.JPG
 - P8080011.JPG


lets see the picture first to see if we want it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:22 PM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: RE: running

WHAT EMAIL? the one with your & in the bowl? The one you drew a fish over
and let Tommy color it in? Sick man. How can I get this damn trailer?
e.

>From: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@ENRON.com>
>To: "Erik Wollam" <erwollam@hotmail.com>
>Subject: RE: running
>Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 13:19:25 -0600
>
>thats a possiblity. did you get the email?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:49 PM
>To: Parks, Joe
>Subject: running
>
>
>Joe if it will get above 32 degrees, I'm ready to go running this week.
>tues
>or wed? at 4:30 at memorial park??? e.
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
>and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
>the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
>others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
>authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
>all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
>intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
>binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
>relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
>Thank you.
>**********************************************************************
>

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


large
thanks
esager


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL JOURNAL'S TECHNOLOGY DAILY
DAILY FEATURE
is now available on nationaljournal.com:
Click Here: http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

TECH DAILY AFTERNOON FEATURE:
People Column: Senior Writer Bara Vaida looks at the top movers and shakers
in high-tech policy
Click here to go directly to the feature -
http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/features/people/peop011023.htm

TODAY ON NATIONALJOURNAL.COM:
-- BILLWATCH: Constantly Updated Tracking Of Key Legislation
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/news/bills/billprogress.htm

-- BUDGET BATTLES: Already Talking About Fiscal 2003 Approps
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/buzz/budget.htm

----------------------------
To stop receiving these E-mail Alerts:

Reply to this message and include the word "unsubscribe" (without quotes)
in the BODY of the message.
----------------------------
National Journal's Technology Daily is published daily by National Journal
Group Inc. For more information about National Journal Group's
publications, go to http://www.nationaljournal.com.


7138258410.  how did you drop your phone in water?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Allen+2C+20Jill+20+28US+20-+20Houston+29+22+20+3Cjilallen+40deloitte+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 9:08 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

were you out of town for work?
send me your # again.  i dropped my phone in water and had to get a new
one....

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 9:06 AM
To: Jilallen
Subject: RE:

what is up jill?  i just got in town last night so i am not sure where i am
going to watch the game.  what have you been up to?  i am definately going
to party after the game.  give me a call later and i will let you know
where we are going to watch the game.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Allen+2C+20Jill+20+28US+20-+20Houston+29+22+20+3Cjilal
len+40deloitte+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:50 AM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:

   what's going on Matt? are you going to the game this weekend?
   if not, where are you watching it?  i think we are going to woodrow's.
   let me know.
   This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
   information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
   protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should
   delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
   message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly
   prohibited.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


Lets see what this looks like.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Knippa/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 05:47
PM ---------------------------

"Anthony, Timothy S. (Gulf Power)" <TSANTHON@southernco.com> on 10/12/2000
05:10:04 PM
To: "'Mark.Knippa@enron.com'" <Mark.Knippa@enron.com>
cc: "'John.B.Gordon@enron.com'" <John.B.Gordon@enron.com>
Subject: Draft ECS/Gulf letter agreement

Mark,
Sorry for the delay.  Here is a draft of the letter agreement between Gulf
and ECS we have been working on.  As you can see, we are still working on a
number for this agreement.  We look forward to hearing from you regarding
the concept set forth in this draft.
-Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Stone, Jeff A.
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 4:58 PM
To: Anthony, Timothy S. (Gulf Power)
Subject: Draft ECS letter agreement
Importance: High

 <<Enron letter agreement draft_1.doc>>

Tim,
Here is the draft we just completed.  It has been prepared for circulation
to the customer.
--Jeff:)

 - Enron letter agreement draft_1.doc


Sean and Diana just returned - found out they had doubled up on those puget
deals - i'm killing 534496 and 534497 right now.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/28/2001 02:53 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

the broker does not show these trades twice, already confirmed deals 534167
and 534168.  pls verify that sean or diana did both of these deals twice.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/28/2001 04:42 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

Verified with Diana and Sean - these should be APB.

and the Williams deal should be resolved - deal # is 534497

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/28/2001 02:39 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb

i have 2 more things besides the williams deal.  apb is trying to leave thats
why i was trying to get these deals resolved.

534496
534497

apb does not recognize, these may be duplicated deals that are already in the
system.

thanks


Could you fax over the original confirm so Chris can look it over and make
sure we won't need additional language or confirms sent? I just want to make
sure he's aware of everything that's going on and backs up my comment in the
deal.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/24/2001 12:03 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: #500966

If you would put a note in the comment section in deal entry, that would be
great.

Thanks!

---------------------- Forwarded by Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001 02:02
PM ---------------------------
   Kate Symes                01/24/2001 01:49 PM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: #500966

Sorry for the delay - it's taken me a while to track down the answer to this,
because Chris Foster, the trader on this deal, is still unclear as to the
answer. Basically, the deal keeps getting cut by the Cal-ISO, which is why
Carla goes in and changes the volumes sometimes. But Chris thinks that in the
end we might not be cutting the deal financially, just physically on a
day-by-day basis. Given that, we only need the first, original confirm sent
out - if revised confirms have been sent, let's go ahead and send them the
original one and leave it at that.

Chris Foster said he would get back with me this afternoon - he's meeting
with Real Time and Schedulers right now to sort out this issue.  I apologize
that this wasn't more clear before. Should I add a note in the comments
section of this deal to clarify? Or should I just check the deal back to "no
confirm"? Let me know.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/24/2001 08:14 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: #500966

This is the deal that was originally in as not to be confirmed and was
changed to be confirmed.  Well, I have confirmed twice because it keeps going
into pending status.   The auditor indictes that carla is going into the deal
and changing something that causes it to go into pending.  Can you check into
this and find out what she is changing, if we need to keep sending revised
confirmations, wha'sssss uuup with this deal?

Thanks!


Hello STEVE HARRIS,

Call us within the next 7 days and receive a free Lens care kit with
your next order!

When you place your order of $40 or more with us, you can get a free
Ciba Vision Solo care kit.  To claim your free gift with your next order,
simply call us at 1-800-Lens-Express (536-7397).  Mention your
customer number and your special offer code SCK when you place
your order.  But you've got to act fast - this free kit offer
ends 10/30/01.  Please remember that this special offer is available
over the phone. Order while quantities last.

Remember, Lens Express guarantees your complete satisfaction or
your money back!

--Thank you from Lens Express

************************************************************

P.S.  This special offer is only available by calling
1-800-Lens-Express (536-7397).  The offer is not available on
our web site at this time.

************************************************************

At Lens Express, your satisfaction comes first.  If you would like to be
removed from future Lens Express mailings, please click the link below.

http://www.lensexpress.com/utilities/request.asp?cust=5292464


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 6:46 PM
To:	Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry
Cc:	Nacey, Sheila
Subject:	NNG/TW Manual Scheduling Report

	How difficult would it be to add the volume to the summary report we do today?

	Sheila and I met with Shelley and reviewed our process.  She felt very good about the process
	but would like to see the volumes impacted by the adjustments not just dollars.

	We can discuss when I get back next week.

	Thanks. Lynn


Chris:

> Attached please find a preliminary draft of the Incumbency Certificate
> that Citibank requires.  You will need to include the appropriate names,
> titles and contact information on the Certificate.  According to Carolyn
> Campbell, Andrea Mahar is the contact person at Citibank.  Andrea's number
> is 212-657-1007, and she will likely ask regarding the
> nature/timing/amounts of the disbursements.  In past deals, Citibank has
> provided us with a fee schedule and a list of money market investment
> options.  You might ask Andrea if she will forward that information to
> you.  According to Carolyn, Andrea might refer you to a woman named
> Estelle Lawrence at 212-657-2076, but the initial contact needs to be with
> Andrea.
>
Don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions.

> Regards,
>
> Marisa
>
>  <<ENAIncumbencyCertificate.DOC>>
>
>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - ENAIncumbencyCertificate.DOC


FYI
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000 11:56 AM -----

	Mark E Haedicke
	11/22/2000 11:56 AM

		 To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Plan B Auction - Need for Approvals ?

Peter:

I think your collective e-mails constitute the legal risk memo.  What do you
think the legal risk rating ought to be?

Regards,

Mark

	Peter Keohane
	11/22/2000 10:28 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Derek
Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Plan B Auction - Need for Approvals ?

Mark, thanks for the voice mail.  In terms of a risk memo, I agree that one
should not be necessary as in many respects this can be characterized as
normal course trading within position limits under a standardized Master
Agreement and without an outlay of capital, but hopefully the following
(together with my memo from last night - copy attached) suffices to the
extent a risk memo is required.

In terms of unusual risks:

1.  We do not have any rights to collateral under the proposed Master.
However, the counterparty is the Balancing Pool which is essentially
Government of Alberta credit risk.  Derek Davies is I believe dealing with
Credit to resolve credit issues.  In fact, I believe the Balancing Pool is
taking significant risk as it is selling the power firm under a Master which
does not match up to the interruptible nature of the PPAs it holds.

2.  The Balancing Pool will be secured under the Master by a parental
guarantee of Enron Corp. and has a somewhat discretionary right to call for
collateral from us under the Master if there is a material change in Enron
Corp.'s creditworthiness.

3.  It is a requirement of the auction that we will have entered into
back-to-back physical hedges for 70% of the volume we acquire, and we are
currently working at putting those deals in place conditional on us bidding
and being successful in the auction.  Penalties can be imposed if 70% of the
volume purchased is not properly hedged.

4.  As we are dealing with the Government of Alberta, we always run the risk
(as we are somewhat seeing now with respect to the Sundance PPA we acquired
in the first auction) that they can change the auction rules, the market
rules or the legislation in ways that are adverse to us.  In terms of the
auction rules, as with the first auction, they could be better drafted, but
our fundamental concern will be to make sure that it is clear that if we post
a bid deposit and do not bid that we get the deposit back, and to ensure that
the rules are clear enough that we are comfortable that we are in complete
control of whether or not we can comply with the rules.

Peter.

(Milly, sorry for not copying you on my first memo - see below.)
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 11/22/2000 08:52
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           11/21/2000 06:38 PM

To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Greg
Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Plan B Auction - Need for Approvals ?

Mark, as I have mentioned to you the Plan B Alberta Power Auction is
scheduled for Nov 29/00, under which Enron Canada can purchase for one-year
terms, in each of three successive years, up to approximately 300MW/year #1;
130MW/year #2; and 65MW/year #3, of the unsold PPA capacity that reverted
back to the Balancing Pool of Alberta following the first auction last
August.  The bid qualification documentation needs to be in Friday and US
Thanksgiving is Thursday/Friday.  I wanted you to be aware of this, and
determine from you if any corporate approvals need to be obtained.

Firstly, Derek Davies/John Zufferli will only be bidding to the extent
authorized by Lavo.

Secondly, bid qualification commits us to the rules of the auction, the forms
of documentation to govern both the auction and the purchase if we are
successful, and requires a bid deposit (approximately C$6.5MM), but does not
obligate us to bid and, provided we comply with the auction rules, the Bid
Deposit will be returned after the auction.

Thirdly, unlike the PPA auction the risks are much less significant in terms
of volume and term.  In terms of documentation, if we are the successful
bidder, we will be buying power from the Balancing Pool under a physical
Master, which seems to be a Canadianized version of the EEI Master and which,
although not entirely to our liking, is generally satisfactory.

Fourthly, the position will, I understand, be managed in the power trading
book within approved position limits.  Note:  The nominal amounts owing (i.e.
no up front payment is required) on an unhedged basis for the entire 300MWs
in year #1 would be something like C$260MM, assuming a C$100/MW purchase
price.  Year #2 would be C$114MM and year #3 would be C$57MM.

Given the nature of the transaction, the short time that we have with US
Thanksgiving intervening, and numerous other demands, I do not believe that a
DASH, Risk Memo and/or Board Approval is necessary, but please let me know.

I will leave you a brief voice mail to follow-up.

Peter.


Dear:

Thank you for giving me an opportunity to have an interview with Enron Corp.
I am looking forward to hearing the result from you.  In case you
are interested in reading some of my works, you can go to

http://www-personal.engin.umich.edu/~centered

Best regards,
Seksan.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com [mailto:Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 4:45 PM
To: centered@engin.umich.edu
Cc: Vince J Kaminski; Pinnamaneni Krishnarao; Osman Sezgen
Subject: Re: Telephone Interview with the Enron Corp. Research Group

Seksan:

This Friday, the 23rd, at 2:30 PM eastern time (1:30 PM Central) would work
fine.  Please let me have the telephone number you can be reached at.

Regards,

Shirley Crenshaw

Seksan Kiatsupaibul <centered@engin.umich.edu> on 06/20/2000 03:19:37 PM

To:   Shirley Crenshaw <Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com>
cc:   Vince J Kaminski <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>, Pinnamaneni Krishnarao
      <Pinnamaneni.Krishnarao@enron.com>, Osman Sezgen
      <Osman.Sezgen@enron.com>
Subject:  Re: Telephone Interview with the Enron Corp. Research Group

Dear:

Thank you for giving an opportunity to have an interview with Enron Corp.
This Friday afternoon from 1PM to 4PM eastern time would be good for me.
Please let me know whether or not the time is also convenient for you.

Best regards,
Seksan.

On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Shirley Crenshaw wrote:

>
>
> Good afternoon Mr. Kiatsupaibul:
>
> The Enron Corp. Research Group would like to conduct a telephone
interview
> with you at your convenience.
>
> Please let me know your availability this Friday, the 23rd and during the
week
> of June 26 - 30th and I will shedule the interview.
>
> The interviewers would be:
>
> Vince Kaminski      Managing Director
> P. V. Krishnarao         Director
> Osman Sezgen        Manager
>
> Look forward to hearing from you.
>
> Regards,
>
> Shirley Crenshaw
> Administrative Coordinator
> Enron Corp. Research
> 713/853-5290
> email:  Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
>
>
>
>
>
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
12:39 PM ---------------------------

Charlene Jackson@ENRON
10/17/2000 08:32 PM
To: Cantekin@mail.utexas.edu
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Bruce/NA/Enron@ENRON, Teresa
Bosien/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Full-time offer terms

Cantekin,
Dolores Muzzy forwarded your e-mail.  I apologize for not answering sooner
but I have been travelling.

Unfortunately, the  terms of the Associate Program compensation package are
not negotiable.  We have reviewed our terms and believe we are competitive
with our peers.  I have spoken with Vince Kaminski who will be calling you to
discuss.

Given that it has taken 6 days to respond to you, if you are still
considering Enron's offer of employment I will extend your deadline until
October 24th.

Please call if you have any other questions.

Sincerely,
Charlene Jackson


Vicky,

Sounds like they've been working you to hard.  You certainly deserve a
vacation.  I would like to hear about your adventures overseas.  My address
is as follows:

   Andy Lewis
   3131 Timmons Ln
   Apt. 1010
   Houston, TX  77027

I got a letter from Diem with their new London address.  I figure I'll give
them a month or so to move in  before I look into visiting.  Of course,
getting time off in this job is easier said than done.  Anyway, enjoy your
trip, and I look forward to hearing from you.

-Andy


Meet with Commissioner Ebert in Biloxi - Confirmed 7/1/97

Contact is Paige - 601-436-4833


Norma,

I am sending you preliminary rankings for my entire
group, based on the results of a meeting we held on Tuesday.
We have ranked Shalesh Ganjoo and Clayton, in case
it's still our responsibility.

Vince

Permanent goup members, manager and below:

Superior:

1. Martin Lin
2. Joe Hrgovcic
3. Tom Haliburton
4. Jose Marquez

Excellent

1. Paulo Issler
2. Robert Lee
3. Chonawee Supatgiat
4. Amitava Dhar
5. Alex Huang
6. Kevin Kindall
7. Praveen Mellacheruvu
8. Shanhe Green
9. Stephen Bennett

Strong

1. Lance Cunningham
2. Clayton Vernon
3. Youyi Feng
4. Yana Kristal
5. Sevil Yaman

Permanent goup members, directors:

Superior

1. Krishnarao Pinnamaneni

Excellent

1. Osman Sezgen
2. Tanya Tamarchenko
3. Zimin Lu

Satisfactory

1. Maureen Raymond

Associates, analysts

Superior

1. Shalesh Ganjoo
2. Gwyn Koepke

Excellent

1. Hector Campos
2. Kate Lucas
3. Sun Li
4. Roman Zadorozhny
5. Charles Weldon


New Hurricane Forecast out of CSU

Renowned hurricane soothsayer Dr. William Gray and his team at Colorado State
University have
scaled back their forecast for the hurricane season but still expect the
season to be more active than
average. Seven rather than eight hurricanes are expected now and only three
of them are expected
to be intense rather than the four expected in the group's prior forecast on
June 7. In round numbers,
the August forecast is for three named storms, two hurricanes, and one
intense or major hurricane.

"Information obtained through July 2000 indicates that the Atlantic hurricane
season in 2000 is likely
to be less active than the four recent very busy years of 1995, 1996, 1998
and 1999. However, total
activity is expected to exceed the long term average and is anticipated to be
considerably more
active than the mean for the recent period of 1970 through 1994.

"We estimate that the 2000 season will have seven hurricanes (average is
5.7), 11 named storms
(average is 9.3), 55 named storm days (average is 47), 30 hurricane days
(average is 24), three
intense (category 3-4-5) hurricanes (average is 2.2), six intense hurricane
days (average is 4.7) and
a Hurricane Destruction Potential (HDP) of 90 (average is 71). Collectively,
net tropical cyclone
activity in year 2000 is expected to be about 130% of the long term average.

The early August forecast update is in close to Gray's Dec. 8, 1999) and
April 7 forecasts, but
somewhat lower than his recent June 7 update. "The forecast has been lowered
slightly [because]
June-July global circulation conditions have not progressed quite as
favorably for hurricane
enhancement than as we anticipated in our early June forecast," Gray said.


Barry is suggesting that we call David Oxley and make sure he got our Fed ex.  Probably late morning.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lucci, Paul T.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:53 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry; Whitt, Mark
Subject:

As you all understand the state of our trading condition, this email is to inform you of another two counter parties who have explained to me why they cannot do business with us at this time.  Dominion E & P and England Energy will no longer sell us gas, until they see clear direction and can accurately predict the outcome of the Dynergy/Enron merger.  They both wish us good luck and wanted to say this is strictly a business decision and that they would want to continue business once we get things resolved.  I'm sure you both are seeing this type of thing first hand.

I feel like I'm back in high school trying to date without a car.  They said it then like they say it now, "it's not you Paul, we just feel we would be better off if we found someone new."

Paul

PS  I have signed the document and have Fed Ex'ed it back to Houston.


Dear Vince:

 I have now spent 16 hours on the valuation project and wanted to touch
base with you to make sure that the basic approach makes sense and that you
think we are making an appropriate amount of progress.  My invoice is
attached.

 By the way, John Martin just mentioned that you have agreed to be our
luncheon speaker at the Texas Finance Festival.  I really appreciate your
help on this and would like to schedule some time next week to talk about
it in more detail.

 I look forward to hearing from you.

regards,

Sheridan
 - Invoice for February and March 2001.doc

Sheridan Titman
Department of Finance
College of Business Administration
University of Texas
Austin, Texas 78712-1179

512-232-2787 (phone)
512-471-5073 (fax)

titman@mail.utexas.edu


Tonya is expecting to speak to the CFO tomorrow - therefore, I would like to
send a draft of the CA this evening.  Thanks.  Dick

From:  Tanya Rohauer
   11/07/2000 11:23 AM

To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard T Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Confidentiality Agreement Request

Please prepare our standard confidentiality agreement for the counterparty
below.  Please deliver to Dick Robinson.  The agreement should read such that
it will also be effective if we view the financials at their office (instead
of receiving a hard copy of the statements).  Let me know if you have any
questions.  Thanks!

Richard T Robinson
11/07/2000 11:18 AM
To: Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

  Counterparty:  Marcal Paper Mills, Inc.
  One Market Street
  Elmwood Park, NJ 07407-1451

  Attn:  Peter A. Marcalus, Sr. VP
  201-703-6404  ph #.
  201-703-6234  fax #

Enron is proposing to sell physical mixed waste paper to Marcal as well as
enter into financial swaps.  We need to prepare a confidentiality agrmt which
will allow Enron  to review financials on Marcal.

Thanks - Dick


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2000
10:27 AM ---------------------------

"George Rahal" <george.rahal@acnpower.com> on 02/07/2000 03:13:58 PM
To: <Phillip_K_Allen@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: W basis quotes

I'll get back to them on this.  I know we have sent financials to Clinton
Energy...I'll check to see if this is enough.  In the meantime, is it
possible to show me indications on the quotes I asked for?  Please advise.
George

George Rahal
Manager, Gas Trading
ACN Power, Inc.
7926 Jones Branch Drive, Suite 630
McLean, VA 22102-3303
Phone  (703)893-4330 ext. 1023
Fax  (703)893-4390
Cell (443)255-7699

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phillip_K_Allen@enron.com [mailto:Phillip_K_Allen@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 5:54 PM
> To: george.rahal@acnpower.com
> Subject: Re: W basis quotes
>
>
>
> George,
>
>      Can you please call my credit desk at 713-853-1803.  They have not
> received any financials for ACN Power.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phillip Allen
>
>


Attached is the Enron Global Markets Global Products Trading notification
memo for  5 Day Cumulative Loss for June 19, 2001.  The Office of the
Chairman for Enron Global Markets is responsible for printing out a hard copy
of this memo, signing it and returning the hard copy to Chris Abel at 3155a,
who will forward it to RAC to obtain their signature.

Thank You


Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca A. McDonald @ ENRON                           02/18/2000 05:51
PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Paul Quilkey

Please join me in congratulating Paul Quilkey in his new role as Vice
President leading our efforts in Australia.  Joe Hirl has assumed a leading
role in the formation of our business in Japan.  Joe also has regional
responsibility for trading activity.

Paul's appointment is in recognition of the critical role Paul has played in
Enron Australia's successful commencement and the body of outstanding work he
has accumulated to date in his career with Enron. It is worth noting that
Paul joined Enron as recently as the Associate intake of 1995.  In the short
time since then Paul has developed and grown through various positions to his
current Trading and Origination role, a position of great responsibility in a
dynamic young business making aggressive inroads into the Australian market,
and far from Enron's traditional US markets.

Please join me in congratulating Paul on his appointment.

Rebecca


Chonawee,

There are many interesting papers on executive stock options.

Keep bugging me for them.

Vince

Chonawee Supatgiat@ENRON
07/10/2000 03:33 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: short-sell vs exercise

Thank you, Vince.
I understand this tax effect already when you explained it to me in your
office this morning.
I agree with you that short-selling is not so good, especially for me,
because I have
a significant capital loss this year. I definitely don't want to increase my
capital loss carry over.
(The short-selling idea might work for a person who wants to exercise his
options and
already has a huge capital gain this year. Unfortunately, it is not me.)
Thanks again for pointing this out.
The "employee stock option with taxes" problem sounds interesting. I will
think more about it when I have free time.
-chonawee

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
07/10/2000 01:57 PM
To: Chonawee Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: short-sell vs exercise

Chonawee,

As I have pointed out, short-selling the stock may be a bad
decision because of tax implications (ignoring the legal aspects).

Suppose the strike is $70 and you were granted an ATM option.
You  sell short at $70 ten lots (one lot  = 100 shares). The price goes to
$100.
You lose $30 x 1000 = $30,000 on your short position. Option exercise
gives you $30,000. This is before taxes. You pay taxes
on your option income (it's treated as ordinary income). The tax is
28% x $30,000 = $8,400. You can use only $3,000 of your loss against
ordinary income. This saves you only $840 in taxes.

Of course, if you have capital gains, you can use losses on your option
position
as an offset.

The remaining part of your capital loss  is carried forward and you get the
tax benefits over time (less the time value of money), assuming you have
income in the
future (or capital gains).

Not so good.

By the way, valuation and optimal exercise of employee stock options
is a very interesting and difficult problem.

Vince

Chonawee Supatgiat@ENRON
07/10/2000 11:40 AM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: short-sell vs exercise

Below is my writing that was originally planned to post somewhere. It
explains how to handle a special type of call options which can be exercised
but cannot be sold. (As we know that it is never optimal to exercise a call
option before its maturity). However, after taking Vince's comments on the
ordinary income/capital loss TAX offsetting issue, I think this is not a good
article anymore. I guess I could just throw this article away. :-)
-chonawee

Short-selling is better than exercising your employee stock options

In general, the sensible time to exercise your employee stock option is when
you speculate that ENE is going down or its growth rate is extremely low. In
fact, when exercising the options, you are speculating that ENE would never
reach this point (plus interest) again during the 10 years maturity date or
until you leave the company. If you do not anticipate that, you should hold
on to your options because you can gain higher profit by delaying your
exercise.

However, if you believe that ENE is reaching its peak. Then, instead of
exercising the options, you should short-sell (or sell) the stocks in that
amount. After short-selling, when you feel that the stock starts to go up,
you can buy them back (to cover), make profit, and still keep the options. On
the other hand, if the stock does not go down as expect, you can exercise the
options to cover your short position anytime.

Let us take a look at a simple case where there are no taxes, no dividends,
and zero risk-free rate. Suppose that ENE follows a simple sample path as
follow

If you exercise 100 ENE options with a grant price of 45 when ENE reaches 70,
you would earn  (70-45)*100 = $2,500. But if you short sell 100 ENE at 70, no
matter how much ENE is in the future, you can exercise the options to cover
the short position and still earn (70-45)*100 = $2,500. The advantage of
short-selling comes when ENE at the period 2 is 60. At this point, you can
cover your short position, get (70-60)*100 = $1,000, and still keep your
options or you can exercise the options and gain $2,500. That is, you still
keep the flexibility of your options when you short-sell. In conclusion, the
only sensible time to exercise your employee stock options is to cover your
short position.


Alison,

I recommended inviting Duane Seppi and Steven Shreve. I would also invite
Brian Routledge.
I don't know him but heard many good things about him. Kevin Kindall may have
other recommendations.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mary Alison Bailey                           09/08/2000 05:04 PM

To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Faculty Lunch

Kristin had said she was interested in a faculty lunch, and Kevin said he
would host it. Are there any professors you would recommend be invited?

Here is a list of Finance Faculty:

 Robert Dammon  rd19@andrew.cmu.edu 412.268.3696
 Richard Green  rg0b@andrew.cmu.edu 412.268.2302
 David Heath   heath@andrew.cmu.edu 412.268.2545
 Christine Parlour  parlourc@andrew.cmu.edu 412.268.5806
 Brian Routledge  rout@andrew.cmu.edu 412.268.7588
 Duane Seppi   ds64@andrew.cmu.edu 412.268.2298
 Steven Shreve  shreve@andrew.cmu.edu 412.268.8484
 Chester Spatt  cs9z@andrew.cmu.edu 412.268.8834
 Christopher Telmer  telmerc@andrew.cmu.edu 412.268.8838
 Stanley Zin   sz0h@andrew.cmu.edu 412.268.3700

*


Martin:  further to my earlier email, the U.S. changes (relating to the Act)
were previously sent to the attention of Mark Evans for the appropriate
distribution.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 10:27 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	03/27/2001 09:05 AM

		 To: Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Commodity Futures Modernization Act

Martin:

How are things going?

In response to your question, there is no internal memo but we do have copies
of external lawfirm memoranda.  Yes, ENA has changed its ISDA Schedule form
to provide for the "eligible contract participant" rep and line of business.
I'll verify with Susan Bailey as to whether these changes have been subnitted
to ECTRIC.

Rather than bombard you with lots of paper, please let me know what you would
lilke to see regarding the new legislation.  Please note that the act is very
broad, extremely confusing (even to CFTC "know-it alls") and addresses many
types of derivatives (ag, equity, etc.) with some specificity.

Will you be in San Antonio?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Martin Rosell
	03/27/2001 08:57 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Commodity Futures Modernization Act

Hi Sara

Can you shed any light on the issues below?

Martin
---------------------- Forwarded by Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT on 27/03/2001 16:56
---------------------------

Martin Rosell
18/03/2001 16:58
To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Commodity Futures Modernization Act

Elisabeth:

I read an article in a law magazine about the captioned Act and it was, among
other things, stated therein that CFTC under the Act had been deprived of its
jurisdiction over swaps (other than those related to agricultural products)
made by eligible contracts participants.  Since the Oslo office trades
through ECTRIC, I wonder whether this new piece of legislation has an impact
on our standard reps relating to the "trade options exemption" and as to the
parties being "eligible swap participants" (are they still required)?  Is
there any internal memo yet prepared on the Act and its implications?

Martin


Hello Paul Thomas,

 This is an automated email delivery.  The following info is for
 tracking purposes only:

 Transaction: 0000199459
 Fulfillment: 00203618*00002
 Location   : 00007

 Industrial Information Resources, Inc.
 Customer Service Department
 (713) 783-5147

 - OUTAGE.dbf


New Peaking Rate for SoCalGas Could Spur Bypass
After various fits and starts surrounding the issue over a number of months, California regulators Thursday established an alternative demand stand-by charge, called a "peaking rate," for Southern California Gas Co., which could open up the utility to "economic bypass" by interstate pipeline projects lined up and ready to go at the border. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) rejected the utility's own proposal as "anti-competitive."
"This case has been very contentious," said the lead commissioner assigned to the case, Richard Bilas. "For the most part, the response to SoCal's application was negative." Noting active opposition from large end-users, merchant generators and interstate pipelines, Bilas said that it is difficult to find an ideal peaking rate for gas. CPUC President Loretta Lynch dropped an alternate proposal to support Bilas.
Ideally, the regulators are trying to keep the utility and its captive customers whole, while not deterring the option of what they call "economic bypass," said Bilas, noting that SoCalGas' proposals did not "reflect market reality. The new rate calculation is very complex, and potential competitors have yet to comment on its impact.
A number of proposed interstate pipelines are lined up at the border awaiting a decision which would make it economic for them to proceed into SoCalGas territory, including an expansion of Mojave to Sacramento, Questar Corp.'s proposed Southern Trails oil-to-natural gas converted pipeline from the Four Corners area to Long Beach, and Kinder Morgan and Calpine's Sonoran pipe to San Francisco.
Up to this point the utility's residual load service (RLS) charges -- which customers of other pipelines had to pay in addition to charges paid to the transporting pipelines -- made it uneconomic to sign up on other lines. Called on by the CPUC to come in with a more moderate system, SoCalGas had proposed replacing the RLS charge with a peaking charge that customers said was just as onerous.
The CPUC made its decision on a revised peaking charge unanimously on a 4-0 vote, with one of the five-member body's commissioners absent.
The CPUC action establishes a peaking rate for SoCalGas customers who want to take only partial service from the utility and get their baseload service from another pipeline. Customers will be required to pay a monthly demand charge, public goods charge collected on a volumetric basis (so if there is no use, there is no charge), a reservation charge with a complex formula, and an interruptible peaking rate for volumes actually received.
Peaking customers will be subject to daily balancing and a credit for service interruptions of firm capacity, which will apply to both new and existing facilities.
"The new rate contrasts to the rate design in place for SoCalGas' standard full-requirements firm-load customers who pay for priority on a volumetric basis," Lynch said. "We're changing the peaking rates so that customers not taking their full service from the utility will only pay for the amount of capacity they use on any given day.
"The challenge for the CPUC in this case was to establish a peaking tariff for natural gas service that fairly compensates SoCalGas for standing ready to serve the peak needs only of some customers, while those customers go off its system for their baseload needs, but also to develop a tariff that allows SoCalGas to be able to compete with some of the energy company pipelines that plan to enter into SoCal's service territory.
"We're trying to encourage and promote additional natural gas resources without encouraging cherry picking or overbuilding for which core customers would end up paying for," Lynch added.


Hello, can you check these deals and see if the counterparty name is wrong.
They are in as Enmax Corporation and we are wondering if they should be Enmax
Energy Corporation.  The contract did not come over correctly so we wanted to
make sure the counterparty name is correct before we set up a new contract.

Thanks,
Melissa
(713) 853-1886


Would it help if I found the name of some finance contact at Delta Power?

Kay

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/09/2001 02:46:24 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Salmon Energy

I'm thinking attorneys need a wholly-owned sub to do our overflow work.  I
had to draw a picture for this transaction - the finance people are taking
over

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 3:43 PM
To: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
Cc: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE); Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)
Subject: RE: Salmon Energy

I'd better ask Delta on that one, since there is a financing involved.  I
believe PP to be a wholly owned sub/project co, but I'll confirm.

Kay

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/09/2001 02:10:12
PM

To:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)"
      <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com>
cc:   "Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)" <lee.johnson@ps.ge.com>

Subject:  RE: Salmon Energy

What is the relationship between Delta Power and Pegasus/Salmon.  I feel
like I'm playing that game called "Telephone"

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
Cc: Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)
Subject: Re: Salmon Energy

PP will own 80% of SE, Enron owning the remaining 20%.

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/09/2001 12:44:37
PM

To:   "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)" <lee.johnson@ps.ge.com>

Subject:  Salmon Energy

What is the relationship between Salmon Energy and Pegasus Partners?

g          GE Power Systems

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

___________________________
           Kent A. Shoemaker
           Counsel
           GE Industrial Aeroderivative Gas Turbines
           GE Aeroderivative and Package Services
           1 Neumann Way
           MD S150
           Cincinnati, Ohio 45215
           Phone:  (513) 552-5838  Dial*Comm:  8*892-5838
           Mobile:  (513) 604-4687
           Fax:      (513) 552-2882 Dial*Comm:  8*892-2882
           Internet:  Kent.Shoemaker@ae.ge.com

> ********************************NOTICE********************
> The information contained in this document and any documents attached
> hereto may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may
> otherwise be privileged or confidential.  It is the property of General
> Electric Company and shall not be used, disclosed to others, or
reproduced
> without the express written consent of General Electric Company.  If you
> are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have
> received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited.  If
> you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please
> notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us at +1 513
> 552-5838) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments.
> Thank you.
>
>


Retained- Houston office. Tx, Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	De Jesus, Frank
Sent:	Friday, January 25, 2002 10:18 AM
To:	Buy, Rick
Cc:	Tessandori, Bobbi
Subject:	Status of Rudi Zipter

Rick,

What is Rudi Zipter's status?  He has sent a couple of emails to Bobbi Tessandori our immigration representative .  He has taken vacation and paternity and repatriated back to the US.  Is he working in the office? Is he going to be retained? Please advise.

Regards,
Frank


Sorry Stephanie, I meant to send the previous note to Joseph.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/21/2000 04:29 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	11/21/2000 04:27 PM

		 To: Stephanie E Taylor/NA/Enron@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Follow Up

could you please follow up with stephanie and let her know that i'd like to
review?  thanks very much.

	Stephanie E Taylor@ECT
	11/21/2000 03:00 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Follow Up

I am following up to see if you would like to renew the subscription listed
below.  Please let me know at your earliest convenience.

Thank You,
Stephanie Taylor

From: Stephanie E Taylor on 11/17/2000 10:21 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Subscription Renewal

Dear Jeff,
Our records indicate that your subscription to California Energy Markets is
due for renewal.
Please let me know if you would like to renew or if you have questions
regarding the renewal.
Sincerely,
Stephanie E. Taylor


Per,

Did the link work?  If you would like me to go over the information in the
database with you give me a call at x33399.

	Per Sekse
	08/21/2000 08:54 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Financial Trading Agreement Database

Sara suggested I email you and request access to the Financial Trading
Agreement Database so I can better track the status of ISDA negotiations with
my hedge fund clients. Can take care of that for me? Thanks. Per


I may have mentioned this (too much going on!) but they both did agree to sign. Jeff A. contacted Masha yesterday, took her by surprise...wanted to know if he was the target etc., advised her not to visit with him.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cash, Michelle
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:39 PM
To: Seleznov, Ryan
Subject: RE: Statement
Sensitivity: Confidential

Ryan,

The content on this looks good.

Style idea -- would it make sense for it to be in the first person -- for them to sign as a statement, instead of in second person as stated by you?  Does that make sense?  That way, they would "own" the statement when they sign it.

What do you think?

Michelle

-----Original Message-----
From: Seleznov, Ryan
Sent: Mon 11/12/2001 5:07 PM
To: Cash, Michelle
Cc:
Subject: Statement

Here's a first pass....

<<EGM-Statement.doc>>


Check for ML


NEAL, SCOTT M,

You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed by Friday, May 25, 2001.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

Employee Name:
CARTER, TAMARA
CHAVEZ, ALEJANDRA
DE PAOLIS, TAMMI
DEMOES, THOMAS
HODGE, JEFFREY
JONES, DAVID
KAISER, JARED
KEISER, KAM
KNIPPA, MARK
LAMADRID, VICTOR
MARTIN, THOMAS
MUHL, GIL
OTTO, CHARLES
SUPERTY, ROBERT
TAYLOR, JOHN
TIAN, YUAN


Good story on retail -- as a direct result of ARM's hiring of Edelman.  Some
good Lay and Robert Michaels' quotes.
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/07/2001 10:42 PM -----

	"Counihan, Rick" <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>
	02/07/2001 01:09 PM

		 To: "'Allen, Stevan'" <stevan.allen@edelman.com>, "Counihan, Rick"
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "Aaron Thomas (E-mail)"
<athomas@newenergy.com>, "'ARM List Serve'" <Arm@phaser.com>
		 cc: "Warner, Jami" <jami.warner@edelman.com>, "Beiser, Megan"
<Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>, "Fairchild, Tracy" <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>
		 Subject: RE: LA Times story

This story is fantastic!!  It is the best single piece I have seen on the
retail market in California and it is in the newspaper of record.  I think
we should make copies and hand them out in our press packets and all
meetings we have.  I think this is a concrete example of a payoff from
working with Edelman.

-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Stevan [mailto:stevan.allen@edelman.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 9:31 AM
To: 'Rick. Counihan (E-mail); Aaron Thomas (E-mail)
Cc: Warner, Jami; Beiser, Megan; Fairchild, Tracy
Subject: LA Times story

http://www.latimes.com/business/reports/power/lat_retail010207.htm

This piece ran front page of this morning's LA Times. It refers to provision
of AB1X we are concerned about. Also, Enron gets a lot of attention. I will
have this forwarded to the entire team later this morning. Thanks.

Stevan

PS - Bryson is having a news conference this morning in Sac. Will keep you
posted.

Deregulation Didn't Foster Competition

By NICHOLAS RICCARDI and STEVE BERRY, Times Staff Writers

The way people scrambled for a stake in California's power market three
years ago, you'd have thought it was the second coming of the Gold Rush.
Politicians and free marketers boasted that they were freeing millions of
customers from their monopolistic utilities so they could shop for cheaper
electricity. The state ordered an $87-million publicity campaign, promising
a brave new energy world bustling with competition.
But those dreams of capitalism unleashed never materialized, dashed by
provisions in the 1996 deregulation law that effectively undermined
competition and gave the utilities a substantial edge over newcomers. In the
end, only 1.7% of the utilities' residential users switched to other
providers, many opting to pay more for "green" energy.
Although the chaos swirling around California's electricity crisis has
chiefly focused on soaring wholesale prices, the virtual absence of
competition at the consumer level has played a key role in deregulation's
undoing.
Had competition among retailers flourished, garnering the millions of
customers deregulators expected, prices might never have reached today's
unprecedented peaks and the turmoil might have been tempered, economists and
retailers say.
Retail competition "would not have prevented a crisis, but it would have
toned it down," said Richard Counihan, spokesman for Green Mountain Energy,
which has returned most of its 50,000 customers to the utilities' ranks.
Now even the prospect of competition is gone. A measure enacted by the
Legislature last week, which made state government the biggest electricity
buyer in California, suspended further retail competition, preventing anyone
from underbidding the state.
"That buries us," said Tony Wayne, president of UtiliSource of Brea, which,
under the new law, can keep its relatively small number of customers but is
barred from entering into new contracts.
Few thought it would come to this.

High Hopes Collide With Reality
Almost 300 firms registered with the state to sell electricity to consumers.
Many of them, quick-buck hucksters or small-time operations, were scared off
by background checks, fingerprinting and the $25,000 deposit required to
enter the market.
But then there were the likes of giant Enron Corp., which predicted that the
new market would pull 700,000 customers from the utilities in the first few
weeks. Another firm deployed 400 salespeople, nabbing residential and
business prospects by the thousands.
They quickly discovered that the structure of California's landmark
deregulation effort erected protective barriers preventing most retailers
from beating the prices of the big three utilities--Southern California
Edison, Pacific Gas & Electric and San Diego Gas & Electric.
For example, deregulation law allowed the utilities to keep their 9 million
customers until each took the initiative to switch. Any ratepayer who used a
moderate amount of energy and wanted to change companies had to pay $600 for
a new meter--unless the retailer wanted to eat the cost itself.
In contrast, Pennsylvania, where deregulation has been more successful than
in California, requires most of its utilities to surrender some of their
customers. Last year, 300,000 customers of one utility were auctioned off to
the retailer who could promise them the most savings. All together, close to
1 million customers have switched from utilities to retailers, with savings
estimates ranging from a few dollars to $15 per month.
In California, the next barrier was expressly designed by deregulation
architects to keep new retailers at bay, at least temporarily.
Before throwing utilities into a free-for-all, lawmakers felt obligated to
give them time to pay off debts that would hurt their ability to offer
competitive prices. The Legislature froze customer prices at 1996 levels,
well above what the utilities were then paying for electricity. The
difference would be used to pay their debts.
The hitch for prospective retailers was that their customers--like those
remaining with utilities--would be charged the extra amount too. That
seriously hurt the retailers' ability to shave prices for their customers
without taking a hit themselves.
Utility executives say the so-called competition transition charge
accomplished its intent: providing some protection against new players until
the utilities could shed their debt and compete on an even field.
According to those executives, the plan went awry when wholesale electricity
prices soared before the special debt charge was lifted and competition had
a chance to flourish.
"We haven't had enough time for this market to work," said Denise Grant,
director of the Edison division that works with retailers. She said Edison
expected to lose 150,000 customers annually--a far cry from what has
happened.
Retailers say they faced other obstacles that seemed designed to help the
utilities keep as many of their customers as possible.
One of the biggest was a newly created energy marketplace called the Power
Exchange.
Under the exchange's rules, all buyers--little guys with a few hundred
customers and mammoth utilities with millions--paid the same price for
electricity. Once again, retailers were stymied in their search for ways to
cut their customers' bills.
Retailers had no place else to shop for energy because suppliers could make
more money selling in high volume to billion-dollar utilities on the Power
Exchange, rather than cutting small deals with upstart companies.
Wayne, the president of UtiliSource, learned the hard way. He was peddling
electricity in California in early 1997, before the state created the Power
Exchange. After arranging a good, but informal, deal with a Washington
generator, he sent out hundreds of salespeople, took to the road himself and
soon cornered 10,000 customers.
But the birth of the exchange caused the death of his deal, Wayne said. The
generators pulled out when they realized how much money they could make
selling on the open market.
"That was an oh-my-god. They said, 'Why should we give you a discount when
we can sell it to the Power Exchange ourselves?' " he said.
Retailers say the state protects the utilities in subtler but no less
damaging ways. That includes billing customers who switch companies for
certain overhead costs of their old utilities, such as weather forecasters
and accountants involved in procuring electricity.
In late 1999, a coalition of retailers filed a complaint with the Public
Utilities Commission arguing that their customers should not be forced to
pay costs for utilities they had decided to leave.
Earlier this month, the PUC finally reached a decision that favors the
retailers' argument but accepts the utilities' calculations of the expenses
borne by retailers, an amount critics say is far too low.
In dissenting, Commissioner Richard A. Bilas called the decision's paltry
award to retailers another strike against them.
"We cannot keep stymieing retail competition if we are seeking rational
markets," he said. "Energy service providers [retailers] have left the state
in droves. . . . They need all the encouragement we can give them."

Retailers Found Little Opportunity
Be they multinational giants or kitchen-table entrepreneurs, retailers are
dismayed by their experiences with deregulation.
Enron spent $5 million trying to sell electricity in 1997 and the spring of
1998. But, unable to offer enticing discounts, the firm picked up only
30,000 customers.
In a recent meeting with reporters and editors at The Times, Enron Chief
Executive Kenneth Lay suggested that the framers of deregulation kept market
forces pinned down in the retail sector. As a result, there was little money
to be made and little incentive to stick around.
"The more customers you signed up," Lay said, "the more [money] you lost."
Last week, Enron returned a number of its remaining electricity contracts to
PG&E. "In the end," Lay said, "we couldn't change the rules and we pulled
out."
On the other end of the spectrum, Paul Oshideri is now a one-man operation
since he laid off his seven employees during his unprofitable two years
trying to entice customers to Cucamonga Energy.
"You don't have that many options," said Oshideri, who is still holding on
to his 250 customers and vows not to quit. "What can you do? You can't do
anything right now."
Only when it came to businesses and big institutions such as universities
were retailers able to make a dent in the market. The small price reductions
they offered translated into huge savings for those large users of
electricity. The retailers also offered a variety of other services,
including aid to help businesses become more energy efficient.
Although fewer than 2% of all residential customers have switched to new
energy companies, 13% of industrial users have done so, according to the
Public Utilities Commission.
"If they'd structured this differently they would have had households able
to make big savings just like industrials," said Cal State Fullerton
economist Robert Michaels.
There is some dispute among deregulation critics over whether legislators
designed the law to protect the utilities from an onslaught of competition,
or it just turned out that way.
Jesse Knight, a former member of the Public Utilities Commission who
dissented on the panel's deregulation plan, said the law is biased against
retail competition.
"But I don't think it was the legislation's intent to protect the monopoly,"
Knight said.
There is general agreement, however, that not enough attention was paid to
the mechanics of the retail market.
Much of the deregulation legislation deals with generation, transmission and
wholesale prices of electricity. The only provisions on the retail end
simply allow consumers to shop for deals.
Lay, the Enron executive, recalled that the utilities fought hard to
maintain their customer base. The irony is that, with wholesale prices
skyrocketing over the last six months, buying electricity for all those
customers has driven the utilities to the brink of insolvency.
"With 20-20 hindsight, I expect they wish they'd agreed to more choice at
the customer level," Lay said. "Then maybe they wouldn't be in the
circumstances they're in."
   News </news> Politics </news/politics> Entertainment
<http://www.calendarlive.com> music <http://www.calendarlive.com/music>,
movies <http://www.calendarlive.com/movies/>, art
<http://www.calendarlive.com/art/>, TV <http://www.calendarlive.com/tvent/>,
restaurants
<http://www.calendarlive.com/top/1,1419,L-LATimes-Restaurants-X!Front,00.htm
l>    <<...OLE_Obj...>>    Business </business> Travel </travel>
Classifieds </class> jobs </class/employ>, homes </class/realestate>, cars
<http://www.cars.com/carsapp/latimes/?srv=parser&act=display&tf=/index-defau
lt.tmpl>, rentals </class/rentals>    <<...OLE_Obj...>>    Sports
<http://sports.latimes.com> Commentary </news/comment/> Shopping
<http://www.latimes.com/class/2shop/menus/>     <<...OLE_Obj...>>
 <<...OLE_Obj...>>
Copyright 2001 Los Angeles Times

STEVAN ALLEN
Vice President
Edelman Public Relations Worldwide
1215 K Street - Suite 970
Sacramento, CA 95814

916/442-2331 - phone
916/447-8509 - fax
stevan.allen@edelman.com
 <<Allen, Stevan.vcf>>


Stephanie:

They call me today from Copamex saying they never received the execution copy of the Master.  When did we send it?  Thanks

Francisco Pinto-Leite
Enron Americas
1400 Smith Street, EB 3888
Houston, TX 77002-7361

Tel: 713-345-7942
Fax:713-646-3490
fleite@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Panus, Stephanie
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 4:55 PM
To:	'hibarra@agroasemex.gob.mx'
Cc:	Leite, Francisco Pinto
Subject:	Sample Confirmation

Mr. Ibarra,
Pursuant to the request of Francisco Pinto-Leite, attached for your review is a sample deemed ISDA confirmation for financial transactions.  Please note that this is a sample and does not include all provisions necessary to implement transactions.

If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at the below number or Francisco at 713-345-7942 (or via email).

 << File: Mexico deemed ISDA sample.doc >>

Stephanie Panus
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3803C
Houston, Texas  77002
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490
email:  stephanie.panus@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Smith L Day/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 12:50
PM ---------------------------
From: Mike Curry/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/19/2001 07:45 AM
To: Smith L Day/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Frontera QSE

Smith, Could you please get these filed out executed and back to Frontera.
I'll get you Frank's mailing address for originals.  - Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Frank Busot" <flbusot@tecoenergy.com>@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 5:34 PM
To: mcurry@enron.com
Cc: Catherine Muckerman
Subject: Fwd: Frontera QSE

Mike,

Please complete and return to me.

Thanks,
Frank
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 08:33:58 -0400
From: "Catherine Muckerman" <cmmuckerman@tecoenergy.com>
To: "Frank Busot" <flbusot@tecoenergy.com>
Subject: Frontera QSE
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_C49F2D5E.5E3F4E14"

Frank attached are the forms to file with ERCOT to name Enron as our QSE.  We
need for them to complete some of the contact information on both forms.
Once that has been done, they can sign the acknowledgment form and send the
completed documents back to us for our signature and filing.  Let me know if
you have any questions.  Of course, Enron can contact me if they have any
questions as well.

 - QSE Acknowledge.doc
 - ERCOT-Resource(4-18-01).doc


Roxanne,

Thank you for calling last night. We took Michael out for dinner to celebrate
his first day at SF, and missed your call. Michael had a great first day.
All the kids drew portraits of him, and he got a big kick out of it.

I noticed on the class list that you live in Spring Valley.  We live on
Inverness Park Way, and used to live on Cedarspur a few years back.  It is
nice to know that Michael has a classmate in the neighborhood.

Again, thanks for calling.

Kay


Hi Jeff,

Please see my attempt at question 1 attached - more squishy than analytical.

Let me know what you think.

BTW:    I can write this one up guys.

At 06:39 PM 9/22/00, Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:

>I'll be in town, though i'm going to the "leading edge" deal at haas on
>sat. morning.  home number is 415.621.8317.

 - Kendal Square Research Case 8 Q1.doc

Kimberly Kupiecki
Senior Account Executive
A&R Partners
kkupiecki@arpartners.com
(650) 762 2800 main
(650) 762 2825 direct
fax (650) 762 2801


Delaney--   It looks like I'll be stuck in SF.  Hopefully Lenny will be
able to catch at least some of the action.  Be well,   MIKE

At 04:16 PM 5/3/2001 -0700, Delaney Hunter wrote:
>Folks-
>Just a reminder we are having a meeting tomorrow. See below for details --
>
>Friday May 4, 2001
>9:30 am - 2:00 pm
>California Manufacturers & Technology Association
>Conference Room
>980 Ninth Street, 22nd Floor
>Conference Call in # : 1-800-457-0262
>Code: 176030
>
>I have attached an updated agenda. Big change -- Commissioner Carl Wood will
>be attending. Unfortunately, President Lynch was not available. I will also
>be sending out updated spreadsheets, info on S. 764 and other materials
>first thing tomorrow by fax. Please let me know if you have any questions or
>need more information. See you tomorrow.
>
>Thanks,
>Delaney
>
>


We have been working on structures much like this with the "Muni Initiative"
that  Amanda  Martin started with Mike McDonald and Sandra McDonald.  The
problem is finding a muni that is not currently a utility and a utility with
out of the money QF contracts that is willing to sell them that also has the
distribution system to serve the muni.  There is not much of a role for us in
these deals in any event.


Dear Special Guests and Visitors:     STOP paying high prices for your Inkjet, Fax, Copy and Laser Toner Cartridges. Get FREE Black Inkjet cartridges for your printer!  PriceSmart has teamed up with YAHOO! to offer you incredible savings of 30-80% off every cartridge we carry.  Plus?get FREE Shipping on all orders. Hurry! These offers and prices change weekly.  Look at some of these Specials: Twin  Packs for HP...$39.99. Six-Packs for Epson $49., Twin Pack  for Lexmark $48. We also carry Canon, Apple, Sharp, Panasonic,  Xerox & more...Hurry!   We'll even give you a FREE 50-Minute Phone Card just for stopping by!  Click Here for  your FREE Cartridge and to start Saving!   (NOTE: If you cannot link from above, copy and paste the following URL to your browser.) http://www.realcheapgifts.com  Happy Shopping, PriceSmart


That's my boy!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Serrano, Walt
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:21 AM
To:	Sitter, Scott; Staab, Theresa; Felling, Amy; Lucci, Paul T.; Fresquez, Rick; Becky Wells (E-mail); Don Krattenmaker (E-mail); Duke Stinnett (E-mail); Floyd Trujillo (E-mail); Jeff DeBruyn (E-mail); Karl Durant (E-mail); Tina Serrano (E-mail); Vickie Stringham (E-mail)
Subject:	FW:

That's my boy!!

 - kidslearnyoung.jpg << File: kidslearnyoung.jpg >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 01/19/2000
03:51 PM ---------------------------

dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 01/19/2000 03:41:11 PM
To: Nelson Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON, "        -
*Willie.shannon@dvn.com" <Willie.shannon@dvn.com>, Ami
Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gregory Schockling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: "        -         *Williams, Mary" <mtwilli@columbiaenergygroup.com>

Subject: Carthage Plant Imbalance

I've discussed the Carthage Plant imbalance with Chad Cass at Duke Energy
(Carthage Plant operator) and Willie Shannon at Devon Energy and here is what
I've learned.  Duke and Devon met last fall to discuss the imbalance, which
according to Devon was approximately 240,000 due to Duke at 8/31/99.  Devon
acknowledged that an imbalance existed but didn't think it was that high.
Both
parties seemed to take the position that the other side needed to prove them
wrong.  According to Duke the imbalance grew by 120,000 in September, 16,000
in
October, and another 12,000 in November (all round numbers) bringing the total
to approximately 395,000 through the end of November.  Based on current month
estimates, Duke thinks January sales are 1,000-2,000/day higher than
production, and would like to see a cut in sales of 4,000/day effective Friday
1/21/00 in order to balance for the month of January.  Again Devon disagrees
with this daily overage, based on their production estimates, but since they
recognize an imbalance exists,  Willie @ Devon has agreed to reduce the volume
available for sale by 4,000/day effective Friday the 21st.  This will reduce
the amount of "excess" gas (gas daily-priced) that Enron has available to sell
at Carthage.
Additionally, beginning February 1st Duke requests payback to the plant of
5,000/day, continuing until the imbalance is worked off.  Devon should reduce
their 1st of the month availabe volume by 5,000/d to accomplish this, and
Enron
needs to verify if that reduction is factored into the numbers when they are
setting up February activity.
A key point to this imbalance issue, and one that I believe all of the parties
agree on, is that CES, now Enron, purchases Devon's Carthage gas at the
tailgate of the plant, so any production-related imbalance is between Devon
and
the plant (Duke) and make-up volumes only reduce what Enron receives from
Devon.  Enron is not buying the gas from Devon and turning around and paying
back a historical imbalance.  However, since CES (and now Enron) is set up as
Devon's agent at Carthage, Duke communicates the imbalance information and
coordinates make-up arrangements with Enron.  Enron in turn needs to verify
with Devon that Devon has adjusted their available volumes to reflect any
make-up.  Hopefully once actual make-up commences, Devon and Duke will strive
to reconcile to an actual imbalance that they both agree on.
Please call me if you have any questions @ (713) 693-2581.

David


Scot Chambers at 6-8371