John --

To your point #3Burr --

Probably want to bring in Steve Montovano on the NC PUC question -- we have worked with a local lawyer in the past (I think her name is Allison Duncan) that could help with this question and demonstrate that having an RTO does NOT make a state deal with retail competition any sooner than it wants to deal with the question.  Steve Montovano could probably be of assistance here.  Maybe bring in Allison to DC to deal directly with the staff?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shelk, John
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 8:09 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Robertson, Linda; Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah; Guerrero, Janel
Cc:	Shortridge, Pat; Nersesian, Carin; 'edgillespie@quinngillespie.com'
Subject:	Hill Meetings on RTOs

I had two interesting meetings yesterday afternoon with staff to key members of the House Energy and Air Quality Subcommittee: Rep. Richard Burr (R-NC) and Rep. Chip Pickering (R-MS).  Terry Allen, one of our consultants, accompanied me.

In both meetings, I used to great effect the broad coalition that had filed with us in the Southeast RTO case against the North Carolina PUC stay request.  If you didn't see it -- there is a long article on the coalition and the filing in yesterday's Energy Daily, which I used with the staff to show the many groups that support what we need in the Southeast.  I am going to send them the filing itself as a follow up.

Burr is very important because he is the lead cosponor of the Sawyer-Burr bill that has voluntary RTO language and effectively a prohibition on mandatory RTOs.  Key points--

	1,	We had heard from a friend of Carin's in the Burr office that Burr and/or the staff did not have favorable view of Enron.  I checked with the head of the Duke office -- a personal friend of mine -- who said the staffer has friends who work for Southern.  However, at the meeting, the staffer said that Burr's office had had difficulties with prior Enron lobbyists no longer with the company and that they looked forward to a fresh start.

	2.	Burr's main interest is transmission legislation that provides incentives for more investment so Wall Street will look favorably on transmission.  His main interest is in the incentive pricing section.  He said the bill was put in as they left so could stake out an opening position before Barton releases a draft in September.  (This confirms Pat's observation that Burr likes to be a player.)

	3.	Staff said Burr has done interviews in which he said that a handful of RTOs are inevitable and desirable -- the question is how to get there.  To date, he has been most influenced by the NC PUC -- (Commissioner Ervin, son or grandson of the late Senator, is a family friend of the Burr staffer).  The PUC says that the FERC RTO plans for the SE would force NC to act on retail competition before 2006 -- which it is not in a position to do.  (We need to respond to this argument.)

	4.	Burr staff acknowledged that the final subcommittee-approved bill (if there is one), would move far in the direction of the FERC plan.  He said that the draft to be sent out from committee staff next week will be a staff draft and that it may not even address the tough issues like RTOs -- leaving those decisions to Members.  (I will check with Andy Black -- who told me a few weeks ago that it would either affirm FERC's authority or make RTOs mandatory.)

	5.	Burr would be very interested in meeting with Ken Lay (per the request letter we had faxed earlier yesterday).

Pickering is important for the added reason that he is the primary House sponsor of PUHCA repeal.  His staff confirmed many of the details about process in the House that we had heard elsewhere.  The staff draft will be out next week -- may not cover all issues yet.  There will be 2-3 hearings in September.  That will be followed by a Barton draft that would be formally introduced (reflecting additions and changes from the staff draft.)

	1.	On PUHCA -- I raised our concerns about the recordkeeping provisions and gave him the clarifying language from V&E included in our draft package of language we gave DOE.  He said he has spoken to Kelliher (whose advice he respects) and that Joe said the recordkeeping language needed to be clarified.  Joe referred him to the version in H.R. 2944 in the last Congress (which I will check to see if that solves our problem.)  Staffer is willing to look at our language.

	2.	On RTOs -- Pickering's office has not too much.  The staffer is under the impression that Entergy might actually like them in the way FERC has proposed.  He said Southern has raised concerns about FERC's plans with Pickering's office, but the staffer gets the impression that Southern thinks they are inevitable -- it is all a matter of timing.  The disturbing thing is the staffer said something about perhaps staging the RTO process so there would be more of them of smaller scope now on a pre-set path to 4-5 later.  I said this was a bad idea -- wasted resources to form the interm steps and likely that the final 4-5 would then never happen.  Instead, Congress needs to follow FERC's lead that 4-5 make sense based on natural trading markets, power flows, etc.

I was encouraged by these meetings in terms of not encountering stiff resistance -- but coming away knowing we need to fully implement our aggressive campaign plans to keep the legislative process from becoming a hindrance to achieving our RTO goals.


How do you come up with all this?  Did someone teach you how to write
accomplishments?  This is awesome.  I hadn't thought about integrating my
goals into my accomplishments.  And you consider me an overachiever!!

Thanks.


i think we can get this girl for the party.  we will just have to tell her
that we are big shooters with the rainman suite.

?
 - salsa1.mpe


Attached are some concise talking points on the President's historic 6
month accomplishments.
(See attached file: 180 Days Themes - Revised.doc)

 - 180 Days Themes - Revised.doc


Just wanted to keep you up to date on the reporting status.

Aaron

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zhang, Eddie
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:44 PM
To:	Berutti, Aaron
Cc:	Gaskill, Chris; Dronet, David; Hyde, Chris; Zhang, Eddie
Subject:	west PL daily report

Aaron,

Since late last week PG&E web site started to posted with non data for some of the points.  Our solution currently is refering to previous day's data on the same point and using same values for days overlap and giving same value for new day.  Example:  on 11/01/01's captured file on California Production Injection poin twe have --

			11/03/01	11/04/01	11/05/01	11/06/01	11/07/01
California Pro Injection	     172		      172		       172	       172   	      172

and on 11/02/01's captured file on California Production Injection point we have --

			11/04/01	11/05/01	11/06/01	11/07/01	11/08/01
California Pro Injection

when this happens, out transform code will fail and also potentially cause future loading jobs to fail because some future data is based on past data so we have to manually edited the file as follwing --

			11/03/01	11/04/01	11/05/01	11/06/01	11/07/01
California Pro Injection	     172		      172		       172	       172   	      172

Until web site data is back to normal or we find better solution, this will be the solution we implement for now.  Please let me or Chris Hyde know if you have any questions.  Thanks.

Eddie

5


In case I did not find each of you personally, please be aware that as in the past with new Active X releases you will each be receiving the new version first. Each of you will have a new version of the website this evening, Friday November 16th.

You should not notice any changes, but if you do experience any problems please call me.

Thank you,

Lindsay

Lindsay Renaud
EnronOnline
Desk (713) 345-3703
Cell  (713) 628-0048


FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000
08:00 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Technology

	From:  Ashley Baxter @ ENRON                           08/26/2000 10:54 AM

To: vkamins@enron.com, John Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paulo
Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Radu Tutos/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Keith Couch/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michael Guadarrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy
Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Nat/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christopher
Funk/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clarissa Cooper/NA/Enron@Enron, Anthony
Rimoldi/Corp/Enron@Enron, Denise Rancour/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Lee/Corp/Enron@Enron, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan Garrett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cal Berkely Team Meeting - UPDATE

Please note that the Cal Berkeley Team Meeting location has been moved.

Tuesday, August 29th
2:00 p.m.
49C4

See you there!
Thank you,
Ashley


I've revised both the backgrounder and message point documents.


Wanted to give you a heads up to these flexible physical deals that might
involve your desks via EOL in the near future. We already have one in the
East.  I stressed to the Sitara/EOL folks the importance of adding comments
to the term sections of these baseload and term tickets so we know what is
happening.  One side of these buy/sell or exchange deals will be ratable and
the corresponding partner ticket will have the optionality.Comments will
include the corresponding deal number, that it is in fact a buy/sell or
exchange deal and the delivery time period(3,5 or 10 days) that the
counterparty desires.
I hope this helps...THANKS!

---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT on 06/27/2000
02:51 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Thomas Engel                           06/26/2000 11:49 AM

To: Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Flexible Physical US Nat Gas Products on EnronOnline

Can you all meet this afternoon or tomorrow to discuss this.
Call me 3-1488.

---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000 11:42
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Scott Mills                           06/23/2000 09:51 AM

To: Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen
Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Flexible Physical US Nat Gas Products on EnronOnline

Got any ideas on how this transaction should look.  This looks like a monthly
volume that would be further refined to daily on the expected volumes once
the counterparty has made their decision  (I would imagine logistics will be
the one communicating with the counterparty).  We probably need EOL to
indicate whether it is a 3, 5, 10 day delivery cycle and then indicate this
as comments.

Linda/Karen -what are your thoughts on how separate GTC would work on this.

If we could all do a little homework.  I will get something scheduled for
next week to discuss further.

SRM (x33548)
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Mills/HOU/ECT on 06/23/2000 09:37
AM ---------------------------
Dale Neuner   06/23/2000 08:40 AM

To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Imelda Frayre/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Larrissa Sharma/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Flexible Physical US Nat Gas Products on EnronOnline

We are positioning ourselves to release a new Product Type that we will refer
to as a Flexible Physical Gas product. Legal is in the process of drafting a
GTC and Product Type description that will be used with this Product Type. I
will start the building process once Legal provides the GTC and Product Type
description; but in the interim, here's a broadstroke description of how the
transaction works:

Party A and Party B exchange gas during the month of June 2000.

Party A buys 10,000 MMBtu per day (or 300,000 total MMBtu) at TCO Pool Index

Party B has the right to notify Party A of when Party B wants to take
delivery during the month of June, and may take delivery in one of three
forms: 3-day delivery, 5-day delivery, or 10-day delivery. The gas nominated
for each such day would be a percentage of the total 300,000 MMBtu (i.e.; If
Party B chooses 5 days for nomination, Party A would deliver 20% of the
300,000 MMBtu on each of those 5 days for a total nom of 100%).  Party B pay
TCO Pool Index PLUS a premium.

I understand that this type of transaction is currently done
over-the-counter. Scott Mills has previously issued an explanatory e-mail of
Sitara concerns and we should begin to address those issues.

Bjorn - if you could ask someone to prepare a Sigma Factor in advance, then
my turn around time to for the Product Type should be reduced. Also, due to
the varying 'optionality', do you think these three different products will
require three different Product Types?

Please feel free to call if you have any questions.

Dale
3-9746


Julie, looks great.  Please make sure the video is also in there.  I'm doing
better but very week.  Ready to try food.  If I am at all better i will get
on the plane tomorow.  Yolanda is going to messanger a bunch of stuff to my
house later, just make sure she gets the CD.
Thanks,
m


Barbara, here is my draft of a rehearing request.  As I mentioned, our
outside counsel is going to try to add a few sentences; I haven't heard back
from them, but will send you the revised draft when I do.  I'd be happy to
copy Jay Golub too; please send me his e-mail address.  In the meantime, let
me know if you have any comments.  We plan to file on Monday, Oct. 16.

Thanks,

Susan
713-853-0596


I would like to thank all of you for the opportunity


Dear Shirley,

as you may know, I am taking the research over from Steve (I have always
thought that Steve's movement from the research is a big loss for all us).

Please, could you help us arrange the meeting with Vince when he is here in
London.

thank you very much for your future help.

Slava


Rod has covered all of the angles. He works closely with corp. insurance
folks;
and from time to time we've entertained the idea of bidding out the service.

Jerry Peters
12/13/2000 11:32 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: John Jesse/NPNG/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Insurance Claims

Actually, I am not sure NPNG currently has a lot of expertise in this area.
I have asked John to evaluate whether corporate should handle NBPL's
insurance needs.  We have Jim Menning, spending about 75% of his time on
insurance so I am hopeful that a move to corporate could reduce our costs -
but obviously eliminating 0.75 FTEs is minor compared to the effect (plus or
minus) of a change in direct insurance premiums or allocated insurance
costs.  Do either of you have experience or information that would support
either side, i.e. directly manage ETS insurance function or outsource it all
to corporate?
---------------------- Forwarded by Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron on 12/13/2000
11:25 AM ---------------------------

James Saunders
12/13/2000 08:57 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Insurance Claims

Any chance at  all that we can use Northern Plains/NBPL insurance expertise
to find a solution for ETS increases???


Vince:

Please include Ram Vittal to the summer internship list, if you have not
already done so.
According to my count, that make a total of 8 students from the Enron Tiger
Team who have a desire to work with Enron.

Thanks,
Donna

-----Original Message-----
From: Vittal, Maheshram [mailto:mvittal@wharton.upenn.edu]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 10:17 PM
To: 'FAP '
Subject: RE: Call from Enron

Donna:

I had submitted my resume directly to their recruiting office and haven't
heard from them.  I would be very willing to reforward my resume, if
required.

Thanks,
Ram


I think we need to get on top of this fast!  Can McMann issue a
statement with Dynegy?

Dynegy Won't Comment On Merger Partner Enron's 10-Q
By Christina Cheddar

11/20/2001
Dow Jones News Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Dynegy Inc. (DYN) declined Tuesday to  comment
on whether its merger with Enron Corp. (ENE) would be affected by the
contents of Enron's quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission late Monday.

  In the 10-Q, which was filed five days past the SEC deadline, Enron
revised its third-quarter earnings downward by 3 cents a share, and
disclosed it may have to pay off a $690 million note owed to an
affiliated partnership because a clause  in a financial agreement was
triggered by the reduction in Enron's senior unsecured debt rating to
triple-B-minus by Standard & Poor's a week ago.
  The amount will have to be paid by Nov. 12 if Enron doesn't  find
collateral to guarantee the debt, the company said in the  filing. Enron
is working to come up with an acceptable agreement on the debt, but
didn't disclose who holds the note.

  Enron used partnerships in order to hedge its investment risk, and in
some cases to keep the debt off its balance sheet.  The practice is
being investigated by the SEC and by an internal committee Enron has
named.

  In the filing, Enron also said it may have to take a $700 million
pretax charge to earnings for the declining value of assets held by
another partnership, Whitewing LLP.

  When asked if Dynegy had known about the collateral call on  the debt
or about the decline in Whitewing's value, a Dynegy spokeswoman declined
to comment.

  "We are referring all questions about the Enron 10-Q to Enron," said
the spokeswoman. Representatives of Enron weren't  immediately available
for comment.

  Dynegy agreed to buy Enron earlier this month. Earlier Tuesday, the
deal was worth about $11.97 billion in stock, but Enron shares were
trading at a 32.5% discount to the offer price earlier Tuesday morning,
which is a sign of the uncertainty surrounding the transaction.

  Enron shares were recently trading at $7.86, down $1.20, or  13.2%,
while Dynegy shares changed hands at $43.29, down 31 cents, or 0.8%.

  A ChevronTexaco Corp. (CVX) official wasn't immediately available to
comment on the matter.

  ChevronTexaco, San Francisco, owns 26% of Dynegy and is providing $2.5
billion in cash to Dynegy as part of the buyout.  Last week, an inital
payment of $1.5 billion was transferred to Dynegy and then to Enron to
help meet Enron's immediate cash  needs.

  Dynegy's merger agreement with Enron contains several provisions
beyond the standard "material adverse change" provision that would allow
the deal to be terminated. Still, some question whether Dynegy was able
to fully assess Enron's liabilities prior to striking the deal.

  Investors have expressed frustration with Enron's lack of disclosure,
and even marvelled at the fact that the 10-Q included material that
could have been mentioned in previous filings or company conference
calls.

Energy Cos Limit Business With Enron After 10Q -Traders
By Mark Golden

11/20/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Many energy trading companies were unwilling to sell
power and natural gas for next day delivery to Enron Corp. (ENE) Tuesday
morning, a result of heightened credit concerns following the release of
Enron's quarterly financial report Monday, traders and other sources said.

  For weeks, companies have limited both buying and selling with Enron for
future deliveries. But for the first time since Enron's troubles began a month
ago, energy companies weren't selling to Enron in the spot markets for fear
that Enron might not be able to pay its bills as soon as next month.
  "It's pretty well accepted in the industry that people are staying away for
now," said Charlie Sanchez, energy market manager for Gelber & Associates in
Houston.

  Traders at all of the major companies contacted said they couldn't sell to
Enron Tuesday morning. Several spokespeople for energy companies confirmed the
situation, but declined to say so on the record.

  "Nobody will take Enron," one western electricity broker said. After
struggling, however, that broker eventually found a utility that was willing
to sell to Enron Tuesday morning.

  Calpine, a prominent independent power producer and trader, said it was
willing to sell power to Enron.

  "We continue to sell power to Enron and are monitoring the situation
closely," spokeswoman Catherine Potter said.

  The situation Tuesday morning was fluid. One utility that refused to sell to
Enron in the morning was willing to do so in the afternoon, a person at the
company said. That company's trading, however, was still limited to the spot
markets.

  Credit concerns about the once-dominant energy trading company were
heightened with Enron's filing of its third quarter annual report Monday
evening with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission.

  Enron may have to pay $690 million on a note that became a demand obligation
with the company's most recent credit-rating downgrade, Enron said in Monday's
filing. The company also warned that its profits in the fourth quarter could
be hurt by credit concerns, a decline in asset values and reduced trading
activity.

  "The 10Q in and by itself is a document that could raise concerns," Fitch
analyst Ralph Pellecchia said. "We have a lot of questions outstanding
relative to disclosures that were new to us and their strategies of how they
are going to manage the situation."

  Companies are willing to buy from Enron in the spot gas and power markets,
because taking delivery on commodity and paying for it a month later poses no
credit risk for the buyer.

Reliant surprised by latest Enron disclosure
HOUSTON, Nov 20 (Reuters) - Reliant Resources Inc. (NYSE:RRI - news), a trading partner of beleaguered energy trading giant Enron Corp.(NYSE:ENE - news), said on Tuesday it was surprised by news that Enron could be forced to pay $690 million in debt next week because of a credit rating downgrade.

Shahid Malik, Reliant's president of energy trading and marketing, said his company was still evaluating the implications of the disclosure, which Enron made in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Monday.

``It's another surprise to the industry. We don't need any more surprises,'' Malik told reporters at a press presentation of a new index devised by Houston-based Reliant to track natural gas consumption.

Reliant is a big wholesale electricity and natural gas trader and as such both a competitor and trading counterparty of Enron.

Malik said Enron executives had not mentioned the potential payment of $690 million during a conference call with analysts on Nov. 14, two days before the credit rating downgrade that triggered it on Nov. 12.

Enron agreed to be acquired by smaller rival Dynegy Inc.(NYSE:DYN - news) for some $9 billion in stock on Nov. 9 after a collapse in investor confidence and snowballing financial problems brought Enron to the brink of collapse.

Dynegy wrote clauses into its agreement with Enron that allow it to walk away from the deal if the problems at Enron turn out to be far worse than previously disclosed, but Dynegy executives have said it is unlikely those clauses will be invoked.

Malik said that as a trading partner in wholesale energy markets, Reliant will seek further clarification from Enron about its financial position.

``My guess is that they are going to have a hard time coming up with the money,'' he said.

Malik said Enron's bids and offers in the wholesale electricity and natural gas markets had become less competitive in recent weeks and that this had allowed Reliant and other companies to capture some market share from Enron.

Reliant continued to do business with Enron, he said, but was exercising ``heightened caution''.

Malik said Reliant had not hired any traders away from Enron recently and was currently well staffed. ``But you always look for good people, you always look for talent,'' he added.


Attached are the Management Summary and Hot List as of 10/19.  Please call me
if you have any questions/comments.

Thanks,
Jeff


We are in the process of confirming that all traders are set up correctly and ready to trade when the system goes live.

We need to make sure that your Stack Managers are accessing the correct database. In order to do this, we need to know how you access Stack Manager:

1) Through Terminal Server (the one that opens up a desktop within a desktop and it actually appears that you have two Start buttons).
or
2) By opening the Stack Manager directly from your "native" desktop.

Please reply to this message with either a corresponding "1" or a "2" in the subject field.

If you're not sure which one you have, please contact myself x39673, Teresa Mandola x39807 or Jennifer McQuade x53614 and we'll come by your desk to help you.

Thank you,

Dan Diamond


I called Peoples, Karen was out and Deana was swamped so I didn't ask her any
questions.  I also received one voice mail from the Can Fibre guy and I have
not heard from him either.

Don't seem like anything is getting done.

I hope you had a good weekend.


During one of the World Hunger calls a couple weeks ago I noted that the
later half of Performance Liquidated Damage refund provision in Section
10.9.8 was slighty  broken.   I volunteered to find what I thought it should
look like.   In reviewing the Arcos contract I found the corresponding
provision that seems to capture what I was concerned about.  I have included
the ARCOS provision below for everyone's review.  Some of the defined terms
do not match, but.....

14.18.2.2 If the corrections to reduce a Shortfall are completed before the
Power Island achieves Acceptance and:
(i) such corrections are made and are complete prior to commercial operation
of the Station, and
(ii) such corrections cause a reduction in the performance Shortfall
then Purchaser shall:
(a) refund to Seller an amount equal to the Performance Liquidated Damages
associated with such reduction in the Shortfall, and/or
(b) reduce the offset associated with such reduced Shortfall; however, such
reduction in offset or amount of refund shall not exceed the amount actually
offset (payment withheld) in accordance with Clause 30.8 or paid in
accordance with Clause 14.15 for such Shortfall.
14.18.2.3 If the corrections to reduce a Shortfall are completed after the
Power Island achieves Acceptance, and such corrections are completed within
one hundred eighty (180) days after the Power Island achieved Acceptance, and
such corrections cause a reduction in the performance Shortfall, then
Purchaser shall:
(a) refund to Seller an amount equal to the Performance Liquidated Damages
associated with such reduction in the Shortfall, and/or
(b) reduce the offset associated with such reduced Shortfall;
however, such refund of Performance Liquidated Damages or reduction of offset
will not exceed the amount actually offset in accordance with Clause 30.8 or
paid in accordance with Clause 14.15 for such Shortfall and the amount of
such refund or reduction of offset shall itself be reduced by the following
amounts for each day that passes from date of the Performance Test on which
the Performance Liquidated Damages were originally based upon until the date
that Seller demonstrated the improved performance:
(c) At a rate of $0.23/day for each kW that the Net Electrical Output
Shortfall of the Power Island is reduced (the "Output Liquidated Damages
Refund Reduction").
(d) At a rate of $45.00/day for each kj/kWh that the Net Heat Rate Shortfall
of the Power Island is reduced (the "Heat Rate Liquidated Damages Refund
Reduction").
14.18.2.4 No refund of Performance Liquidated Damages shall be made if the
corrections are made after one hundred eighty (180) days after Acceptance of
the Power Island, unless Purchaser elects to do so as a result of the
corrective action plan presented by Seller prior to the expiry of such one
hundred eighty (180) day period.  In the event Seller determines the cause of
a portion or all of the Shortfall prior to the expiry of the one hundred
eighty (180) day period following Acceptance, but in spite of its reasonable
efforts is not able to effect the necessary corrections to the Plant, Seller
may present a correction plan that extends beyond such one hundred and eighty
(180) day period. Purchaser, at its sole discretion, may elect to permit
Seller the opportunity to make such corrections.


This works-I will work on getting our equipment needs for you.


Please be advised that this information is confidential and proprietary.  We ask that this confidential information be treated as such, in accordance with applicable laws and regulations governing disclosure of confidential information by gas marketers such as Enron.


Hi Robin!
Here's the TXT file.

Have a good night,
Brian.


I'm speaking at a conference in ny again but never got around to making any
plans - any chance you're free?


max,

Sorry I don't understand the invoices.  I can help with contract pricing for the supply agreements for the plant.  Maybe Rick Hill can help.  He is very knowledgable on this plant.

Call me at 37177 and I can discuss the supply agreements.

Robin


Lisa:
Congrats on everything thats going on in your life!  I also wanted to
congratulate you on getting into the NYC Marathon - I think thats great.  I
am subjecting myself to do this again (don't ask me why) since I found out
that I got in the other day.  Good luck and hope to hear form you soon.

Regards,
Ben


Please fill in the blank:
&First Contingency Transmission Outage8 means

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 10:37 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: MDEA Agreement Scheduling

I'm still waiting on David Hunt to send me some stuff, which would really
help move the document along.  I'll ask again if i can get it from him. There
are still internal questions in it, which I have annotated. I'm happy for you
to look at it fairly shortly, especially if you can give definitive
commercial direction.

Do you feel that the commercial team is  finished with the exhibits?  I
haven't worked on them, but I suspect the exhibits need work.  I know the
bogey calc doc is a bit rough. [Rorschach, Reagan]  Exhibits are rough.  I
need to make a list of Exhibits called out in the current doc version, pull
them all together, and clean them up.

Do you still owe me the emergency transmission cut stuff? [Rorschach, Reagan]
  Yes.  I am not exactly sure of the context....but try this on for size:
Clarksdale is subject to an Entergy transmission constraint that from time to
time results in a transmission cut and mandates Clarksdale dispatching their
generation assets to serve Clarksdale Native Load.  Dispatching Clarksdale
assets under these circumstances is known as the first contingency must run
condition.  During first contingency must run conditions, EPMI will document
the production costs, megawatts generated, duration of the event, and lost
opportunity cost of buying from the market.  Clarksdale is due reimbursement
from Entergy for extra costs incurred during such events.

Early next week is better than later, and Thursday and Friday are huge
problem days for me.  When are you thinking of meeting with Beck?  Anyway to
combine the two at once, given the short timeframe? [Rorschach, Reagan]  I
think we could get everyone together at the same time as soon as Monday.  I
want them to have the time to study the document so we can get it all done at
once.

Has Dave signed the extension, by the way? [Rorschach, Reagan]   done,
fedex'ing to MDEA.  Will have faxed copy today.

Kay

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 09:59 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: MDEA Agreement Scheduling

Kay,

We are starting to run into some scheduling constraints for next week, at
least with Bob Priest.  I'd like to get together with Bob and Marvin early
next week to discuss the agreement--moving toward finalizing before June 12.
Bob is only available Monday.  Bob and Marvin think it is a good ideal to
then meet with RW Beck.

I'd like to email Marvin and Bob the next version sometime today?

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363


Please disregard the list on the first e-mail and use this one instead. Also, please note that for dial-in purposes, the phone number in the conference room is 713-584-1091

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mcquade, Jennifer
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 3:48 PM
To:	Abramo, Caroline; Belden, Tim; Benson, Robert; Calger, Christopher F.; Choi, Paul; Clark, Chad; Cowan, Mike; Curry, Mike; Davis, Mark Dana; Dorland, Chris; Furrow, Dale; Gilbert, George N.; Lagrasta, Fred; Llodra, John; Mcdonald, Michael; Otto, Charles H.; Presto, Kevin M.; Rorschach, Reagan; Rosman, Stewart; SMITH, Douglas; Thomas, Paul; Tycholiz, Barry; Valderrama, Larry; Vickers, Frank; Whalley, Greg; Zufferli, John
Cc:	Forster, David; Diamond, Daniel; Mandola, Teresa
Subject:	UBSWenergy Launch Meeting

Please plan on attending a meeting Monday, February 4 at 10:30 AM in ECS 05075in to pick up your launch packets and discuss the procedure and timeline for contacting customers. Those of you outside of Houston should receive an overnight package Monday. The meeting will be very brief. If you have further questions or are unable to dial-in, you can contact me directly at 5-3614 or Teresa Mandola at 3-9807.

Also, please find attached the marketing contact list. You can filter by your name in the PA column to view the counterparties which you are responsible for contacting regarding the Password Application.


To All Appearances on the Gas Industry Restructuring Service List  I.99-07-003

Dear Sir or Madam:

MRW & Associates, Inc. is assisting multiple clients by monitoring the Gas
Industry Restructuring (GIR) proceeding.  Dr. Robert B. Weisenmiller, a
principal of our firm, has already been placed on the service list in the
Information Only category.  Although not an Appearance, Dr. Weisenmiller
respectfully requests receiving from you courtesy copies of all testimony
and pleadings you submit in this case, including rebuttal testimony due May
19, 2000.  E-mail service is preferred.

Testimony and pleadings in this case may be sent to:

Robert B. Weisenmiller, Ph.D.
MRW & Associates, Inc.
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1440
Oakland, CA  94612
rbw@mrwassoc.com

Please note that this is the same information already listed on the
Information Only portion of the current service list.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

/s/ G. Alan Comnes

G. Alan Comnes
Senior Project Manager

cc:   Administrative Law Judge Andrea Biren

G. Alan Comnes
MRW & Associates, Inc.
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1440
Oakland CA 94612
www.mrwassoc.com
510-834-1999
fax: 510-834-0918


Thanks,  I have received same and preparing a final draft for execution.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Hi!

              I know your probably mad at me but I took vacation on Friday
and could not get my husband interested in coming downtown ( I know your
thinking yeah right)!  Scott said it was fun!  Just because I didn't make
your party does not mean you are out of sight  -  out of mind!  I wish you
much happiness and a very bright future.  Take care and come to see us often
(we are still waiting).

Andy


George,
	Questions:
1)	What DA and RT Excel reports are you referencing in the e-mail below? The only report that my group currently sends out is the ISO HA Final which comes from Jim Reyes.
2)	Who are the contacts that are sending you these reports and what are the timelines in which you receive these reports after the date of physical flow.
3)	Please send me and example of both the reports and the discrepancies that you have encountered along w/ your process for booking the information given in the reports.

I think that you are probably referring to the reports that Kate Symes and the R-T group send out, but I don't want to jump to that conclusion without you confirming that to be true. Any information you can give me on the process will be helpful in coming up w/ a solution to the issues that you are running into.

									Thanks
									  Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Phillips, George
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 9:11 AM
To:	Stokley, Chris
Cc:	Couch, Brooklyn; Ruffer, Mary Lynne
Subject:	Disconnect

Chris,

Recently, the Excel files for the DA and RT markets that are sent to populate EES DealTracker, do not tie to the EnPower file sent to us later.  This has caused all parties increased  investigation time and could cause potential delays in the booking of accruals. Recently,  the scenario is occuring more frequently.   I wanted to bring this matter to your attention now to avoid any delays.   Thank you in advance for any assistance you can provide to make the process smoother.  If you have any questions, please contact me.  -George


Andy,

Attached is a spreadsheet which runs through direct costs of adding Markets to EnronOnline, as discussed yesterday.

There is both art and science in this, along with some generalisations.

Perhaps we can discuss at 11:00?

Thanks,

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/Corp/Enron on 01/19/2001 10:05 AM ---------------------------
From:	Carlos Alatorre on 01/19/2001 09:53 AM
To:	David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	Cost w/Pipelines

Dave,
Here is the spreadsheet, pls. let me know any questions/comments
Thx
Carlos


ISC - Customer Service Survey Ticket#HD0000000705941, Password Reset

: Thank you for taking the time to fill out our Customer Service Survey.
Your input is crucial to our continued efforts in establishing and providing you with World Class Support.

Please take a minute and complete the 5 question survey then submit it back to us when you are done.

Once again, thank you for your participation.

ISC Customer Care Group

http://rc.enron.com/survey/survey_1.asp?id=000000000005540


Ladies and Gentlemen,

Due to unavailability of conference rooms on the 44th floor I have reserved a
conference room on the 19th floor from 2:30 PM to 4:30 PM.  The room number
is 19C2.  I realize some people might not be able to attend, so please let me
know and I will e-mail you a summary of the discussions after the meeting.  I
would also like to suggest that we make this a regularly scheduled meeting
and have it bi-weekly or monthly.  This will allow everyone to share their
opinions and knowledge to direct or redirect our efforts based on the market
situation.  Please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions.
Thank you.

Shalesh Ganjoo


"It's a Girl" performed by Weave Dance Company
Weave Dance Co. will perform May 24-26 at 8:00 p.m. at Stages Repertory Theater, 3201 Allen Parkway at Waugh, Call 713-52STAGE for tickets.  This performance, called "It's a Girl!" celebrates pregnancy and motherhood.

Donations to the Houston Area Women's Center will be collected at the performance.  Any of the following items are welcome:  non-perishable, pre-packaged healthy food snacks such as granola bars and boxed juices, baby supplies such as formula, diapers, wet wipes, baby lotion, baby shampoo, pacifiers, socks, plastic bottles, diaper bags, crib sheets for portable cribs and swim suits and flip flops for children age 4 and older.

Star Wars: Films (May 4-25)
See all four completed films of the legendary Star Wars saga on the big screen! The MFAH presents special editions of Episodes IV-VI and Episode I in the newly renovated Brown Auditorium with Dolby Digital dts sound and stadium seating.

Star Wars: Episode IV-A New Hope
Directed by George Lucas
(USA, 1977, 125 min.)
Friday, May 4, 7:30 p.m.
Saturday, May 5, 11:00 a.m.

Star Wars: Episode V-The Empire Strikes Back
Directed by Irvin Kershner
(USA, 1980, 120 min.)
Friday, May 11, 7:30 p.m.
Saturday, May 12, 11:00 a.m.

Star Wars: Episode VI-Return of the Jedi
Directed by Richard Marquand
(USA, 1983, 132 min.)
Friday, May 18, 7:30 p.m.
Saturday, May 19, 11:00 a.m.

Star Wars: Episode I-The Phantom Menace
Directed by George Lucas
(USA, 1999, 133 min.)
Friday, May 25, 7:30 p.m.
Saturday, May 26, 11:00 a.m.

Tickets go on sale at the Brown Auditorium ticket booth 30 minutes before
show time. The ticket booth is located on the lower level of the Caroline
Wiess Law building.

General admission is $5. Matinee admission (show times before 5:00 p.m.) is $4. Enron employees with ID receive a $1 discount. Discount passes (10 admissions) are $40 for nonmembers and $35 for members. Children 5 and under are free. Films are screened in Brown Auditorium in the museum's Caroline Wiess Law building, 1001 Bissonnet.  Free parking is available.  For more information, please call 713-639-7515 or visit our website at www.mfah.org.

Mark Your Calendars!...Bring Your Child To Work Day will be Friday, June 29th.  More details to come...See Volunteer section below to for volunteer opportunities!

Join us in Dublin or Honolulu ----Joints in Motion is a marathon training program for walkers and runners that is aligned with a fundraising effort for the Arthritis Foundation - Please call for more information at
713-529-0800.

Many volunteers are needed to help with the planned activities for the Enron Children on June 29th.  If you're interested, send your name and phone extension to workperks.enron.com.

Support KidSave and Help Miracles Happen. Every Summer.

Kidsave's  Summer Miracles Program enables orphaned children ages 5 to 11 to travel to the  US and Canada, live with families and attend day camp. The program gives  families who may be concerned about the problems of adopting an older child a chance to meet, get to know and in the best-case scenario, fall in love with a  child. The program gives prospective parents an opportunity to see and evaluate  first-hand the challenges and rewards of adopting an older  child.

In 1999 and  2000 Kidsave and adoption agency partners placed 432 children - 96 percent of  children who participated in the program. Generally, 85 to 90 percent of  children who participate in the program find homes easily through the program.  The remaining 10 to 15 percent require more work.

Kidsave  believes every child deserves a family. We are committed to placing all children  who participate in the Summer Miracles Program in permanent families or  family-like environments.

We are looking  for families to host children, and for others who want to help us make the camp  program happen for these 250 children.   As a non-profit organization, Kidsave depends on donations to raise the  money to bring these children here and find them families.  Please call Tonya Hoppe at 281.286.8948  or tonya@tonya.cc to get involved in Houston's  Kidsave program.

Enron and Kidventure Camps are proud to bring you Camp Enron Summer 2001.  Celebrating our third year, Camp Enron  will once again be providing summer camp for children, ages 5-13, of Enron employees and contractors.

This year, camp will be May 29-August 10.  Ten, one-week sessions will be  available and families may choose to attend any or all sessions.  Each camp week is Monday through Friday.

The cost is $150 per week and includes all transportation, field trips and activities.  A deposit of $50 per week is all that is needed to reserve your sessions.   The deadline to register is Monday, May 21.

To register, log on to: http://www.kidventurecamp.com/camp_enron.htm.   Spaces are limited.

Enron parents simply ride to work with  their children and check them in to the Energizer in the morning with the Camp Enron Team.  Enron Campers are loaded on Coach USA Buses and transported to our nearby camp. At the end of the day campers are brought back to the Energizer for parents to check out.

It's that easy!

For more information please contact:

web site: www.kidventurecamp.com
call Kidventure: 713.960.8989
e-mail: camps@kidventurecamp.com

Have News to Share?
To post news or events in Enron In Action, please e-mail your information to EIA@enron.com
no later than 12:00 noon the Thursday prior to the next Monday's mailing.


I will be running the power options desk with UBS. I will still be trading gas though. how about you ?


And, if duty calls, he would understand. . . .

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yoder, Christian
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:09 AM
To:	Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	RE: Gossip

There were those times, during the War, when fighters on one side of the line would gain personal knowledge of the presence of old friends, even relatives, being directly across the lines, back there in the mass of enemey troops.  The Union General Hancock had been a very close friend of the Confederate General Armsted and on the eve of the final day at Gettysburg,  had a moment or two remembering their good old days together in California.  Wolfe and Krebs are out there somewhere "on the other side."  Although I must candidly confess that officer Krebs does not rank high in my humble judgement and is not among the significant players in the combat,  Wolfe does.  Wolfe was a player.  He is out there somewhere on the otherside, talking to "them" and not to "us" at night, and this causes me the pain of sorely missing a guy I spent many an hour beside in the trenches.  I miss Greg.  I hope I don't have to go head to head with him,  but, if duty calls.....----cgy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:45 AM
To:	Yoder, Christian; Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	Gossip

I hear that former Enron marketers Greg Wolfe and Holli Krebs will be joining AEP.  AEP does not yet have an office in Portland, but Greg is working out of his house.  Holli has not yet started work because her non-compete agreement is still in force.


Thanks--I appre ciate your willingness to help.  One thought Dot had is that
it might make sense to use someone (i.e., Denise or Ja) who does the actual
entry of payables into SAP.  Do you do any of that stuff directly on SAP?
Stop by and grab me for a minute and we'll decide who to use for this.  df

From: William E Brown/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/26/2001 04:02 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Louis Soldano/ENRON@enronXgate, Dorothy
McCoppin/ENRON@enronXgate, Jim Talcott/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: RE: iBuyit Payables Workflow Tool Stakeholder Kickoff Luncheon March
20

While I presently do not possess all of the qualifications requested below,
I'm certain I can rise to the occasion.  Let me know if its a "go" with me.

bill

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Fossum, Drew
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 10:39 PM
To: Soldano, Louis; McCoppin, Dorothy; Brown, William E.; Talcott, Jim
Subject: iBuyit Payables Workflow Tool Stakeholder Kickoff Luncheon March 20

Got any ideas on who would be the best person in our group to work on this?
Thanks.  df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/25/2001
10:38 PM ---------------------------

Mark Greenberg
03/23/2001 04:01 PM
To: Robert Eickenroht/Enron@EnronXGate, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Koogler/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kelly Higgason/HOU/EES@EES, Jordan
Mintz/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Rob Walls/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: iBuyit Payables Workflow Tool Stakeholder Kickoff Luncheon March 20

To All -

I have been asked to be the Legal Department stakeholder for the final
development and implementation of the iBuyit program.  Basically, iBuyit is
an intranet based procurement and payables systems being developed for
implementation across Enron.  It is intended that this system will become the
standard method for purchasing any number of services and for paying the
invoices associated with these purchases.

As a stakeholder, it is my responsibility to assist with the development of
the product and its marketing (internal to the various Enron Legal
Departments).  In order to ensure that the development and implementation run
as planned, the program calls for the appointment of "Change Agents," -
defined as:

"individuals who are highly respected within their area and known as the 'GO
TO' people among their peers."

Though I am sure this definition fits each of you to a tee within your
respective departments, I am also well aware that schedules may prohibit you
from being the Change Agent.  Accordingly, what I am in need of is assistance
in designating that one person within your respective departments who can
become the Change Agent for your group.  The responsibilities of this
position are the following:

 - to disseminate communications regarding the project
- to develop awareness and ownership of the product among their department
- to encourage use of the product
- identify those who will need training
- encourage peer training attendance
- engage in rumor control (basically relay the facts of the program and not
the myths (e.g., the product will replace jobs))

In picking the appropriate candidate, I would make sure that he/she has a
working knowledge of the procurement and payables practices of your group,
together with knowledge of the SAP system.  Since the iBuyit system will
interface with SAP, this latter knowledge would be very useful.

Please let me know as soon as possible who is the likely candidate from your
group so that I can meet with them and bring them up to speed on the
program.  For your benefit, I have attached below the general information
that has been provided to stakeholders about  the program.

If any of you should have any questions, please call me.

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 03/23/2001 03:05 PM -----

	Bob Butts Sent by: Dortha Gray 03/12/2001 05:31 PM 	   To: Karen
Choyce/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Morris Brassfield/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Wanda
LaBaume/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Carolyn Barrett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mildred Dworsky/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Elaine Schield/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kerry
Roper/GPGFIN/Enron, Nancy Haralson/NA/Enron, Steve Frazier/HOU/EES@EES,
Pamela Rush/Corp/Enron, Thao Nguyen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joanne
Tran/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Allen W Ueckert/NA/Enron, John
Gillespie/Corp/Enron  cc:   Subject: iBuyit Payables Workflow Tool
Stakeholder Kickoff Luncheon March 20

You have been selected to attend a Stakeholders Kickoff Luncheon on March
20th from 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM at the Double Tree Hotel in the Travis Room, to
learn more about the new iBuyit Payables Workflow tool.  The iBuyit Payables
Workflow tool is fully automated and will allow for greater ease and accuracy
when coding and approving invoices.

At the luncheon:
o You will be the first to see the iBuyit Payables Workflow tool
o We will be asking you for input on the tool
o We will reveal more about your role in the success of the iBuyit Payables
Workflow tool

Please review the attached Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities and the
slides of the iBuyit Payables Workflow tool.  We will have additional copies
for you at the luncheon. Also, please bring your list of identified Change
Agents with you. (Change Agent is defined in the Stakeholder Roles and
Responsibilities attachment)

If you cannot personally attend, be certain to send an alternate.  Direct any
questions about the event or any special dietary requests to Judy Knepshield
at X-35788.

 << File: STAKEHOLDERS ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES.ppt >>  << File: P2P -
Management Meeting (v.2.28.01).ppt >>


The Educational Assistance Forms for  the GMAT Preparation class are
available outside EB1197 and attached below.  After you have completed the
form, return it to Brad Stewart, EB1181A, for approval and processing.
Reimbursement will be made after you have completed the course and provide
Brad Stewart with a certificate and your receipt.

For all other questions regarding the GMAT (i.e., test results, space
availability, logistics, etc.) please contact Patricia Slaughter at x36908.

For your convenience, we now have a Form Center located adjacent to EB1197.


The following files contain a graphical view of the average deal count per
month by Commodity for EOL and OTC transactions since the launch of
EnronOnline. This information is for comparitive analysis only.  Do not
update links when opening these files.

AVERAGE DEAL COUNTS FOR ALL COMMODITIES

NA GAS BREAKOUT BY REGION (Non-Averaged, including Volume and Notional Value)

If you have any questions regarding this breakout, please contact one of the
following:

Torrey Moorer x3-6218
Matt Motsinger x3-5221
Pete Berzins x5-7594

Pete
EnronOnline


Juniper GP, LLC

This limited liability company was formed in Delaware on November 5, 2001.  Particulars are:

	Parent Company:	ECT Merchant Investments Corp. - 100%

	Business:	Acquisition of 100% of the general partnership interest in Juniper Energy L.P.

	Employees:	No

	Foreign Qualifications:	Louisiana and Texas (pending)

	Company No.:	1791-JUNP

Please circulate this information to all interested parties in your group.

For more information, see attached Corporate Data Sheet.

PLEASE NOTE:
	Mary Heinitz - copy of evidence being sent by interoffice mail
	Angie Ramirez - please apply for FEIN
	Sylvia Hu - Minute Book and one seal have been ordered

Lillian R. Bailey
Administrator
Corp. Services
EB4863
Ext. 33577
Telephone 713/853-3577
Fax 713/646-8007
lillian.bailey@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Lillian
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:52 PM
To:	Ramirez, Angie; 'apke@alltel.net'; Barrow, Cynthia; Davis, Hardie; King Jr., Frazier; Rice, Greek; Whalley, Greg; Whiting, Greg; Bouillion, James L.; Derrick Jr., James; Priddy, Janice; Burgess, Jay; 'Jmoise@alltel.net'; Lavorato, John; Swafford, John; Leo, Johnson; Knepshield, Judy; Murray, Julia; Cole, Kate; Carnahan, Kathleen; Eggebrecht, Kurt; Pardue, Larry; Pinder, Lori; Pham, Lynda; Perkins, Mary; Moore, Jerry Thomas; Rieker, Paula; 'rkimbrell@alltel.net'; Hrna, Sandra; SAP Master Data; Aune, Stacey A.; Hu, Sylvia; Callahan, Teresa; Trujillo, Vicsandra; LaBaume, Wanda
Cc:	Heinitz, Mary J.
Subject:	Juniper GP, LLC - New Formation

Juniper GP, LLC

This limited liability company was formed in Delaware on November 5, 2001.  Particulars are:

	Parent Company:	To be confirmed.

	Business:	Acquisition of 100% of the general partnership interest in Juniper Energy L.P.

	Employees:	No

	Foreign Qualifications:	None

	Company No.:	1791-JUNP

Information not yet confirmed by LLC Agreement.

Please circulate this information to all interested parties in your group.

For more information, see attached Corporate Data Sheet.

PLEASE NOTE:
	Mary Heinitz - copy of evidence being sent by interoffice mail
	Angie Ramirez - please apply for FEIN
	Sylvia Hu - Minute Book and one seal have been ordered

Lillian R. Bailey
Administrator
Corp. Services
EB4863
Ext. 33577
Telephone 713/853-3577
Fax 713/646-8007
lillian.bailey@enron.com


Chris--FYI--are you available for a meeting Thursday, March 30 at 11:00 a.m.
to discuss these issues?  If so, will you ask Kim to get a room for us for
about an hour?

Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000
12:47 PM ---------------------------

mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/28/2000 12:34:07 PM
To: " - *colleen.sullivan@enron.com" <colleen.sullivan@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: storage clarification & issues

Colleen,

Attached is an updated storage proxy schedule for COH and AGL showing what our
balance will be as of April 1, 2000.  As always, if you have any questions,
please let me know.  I'm sending a copy of the document to Denny Pick for
signature and will then send it to Jeff Hodge to get signature from Enron.

Aside from the storage issue, there are several other items that we need to
discuss.  Below is a brief description of each.  Please let me know how you
think we could best deal with these - whether it's via phone call or having an
in-person meeting down in your office.

1.  Pricing - I left you a message about this last week.  According to Chris
Germany, all changes to volumes after first-of-the-month must me negotiated.
In the contract, however, it specifically refers to pricing intra-month using
gas daily OR negotiated pricing depending on the timing of the change.

2.  Consistency - During our discussions with Chris, it sounds as though some
pipes are being handled differently than others again as it relates to
intra-month changes.  I'd just like to make sure that we agree on the pricing
mechanism and then apply it consistently.

3.  Local production - Apparently there was local production that John Singer
purchased specifically to back Retail customers, and this production was not
removed from the Wholesale book prior to the sale.  We need to discuss how to
handle this production.

4.  Monthly invoices - We still haven't seen the complete January 2000
invoice.  As I understand it, the demand charges have not all been sent over,
and several items that need to be changed haven't yet been changed.  Also,
Brian Perrone and Charlie Dalphon have indicated that they have requested
back-up documentation on the demand charges, but we still haven't received
anything.

5.  Swap confirmations - For all of the swaps that Clay Deaton put in place
with Enron to keep Retail's existing hedge positions in tact, I still do not
have executed copies of all of the confirmation agreements.  Rich Contos and I
have both called several people about getting a complete set of copies, but we
can't seem to find the right person over there.

Whenever you have time to discuss these, please let me know.

Thanks,

Melissa


Ed has written the draft for the first assignment. I will be checking it today and making my comments by tomorrow morning. Feel free to make yours. I beleive the book Mananging Energy Price Risk is a great reference for the second assignment.

Thanks.
Paulo Issler

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 10:28 AM
To:	Issler, Paulo
Cc:	Righi, Sheri A
Subject:	Material for review

Paulo, Please review and comment.  No pride of authorship, so feel free to make any edits that you feel useful.  Also, let anyone you want to look at it as well.  Please reply with your timing once it is determined.  If you have any questions, please ask.
Regards,
Ed

[Issler, Paulo]

Vince/Vasant:

This relates to my early coversation with Ed today. He requested our help in puting together a text for the Accenture project, which is about recreating the Derivatives I, II, II classes in an electronic/interactive environment. As he pointed out, it would be nice to have the first assignment for early next week. I agree with Vasant in terms of being almost impossible to get something ready by tomorrow.
Vasant also sugested that we use the Technical Corner Articles as a source for this. Maybe Sam may help on that. Whatever we do, however, we would like to have you review the final text.

I will get back to Ed on that today. Please advise.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:27 AM
To:	Issler, Paulo
Subject:	Accenture Project

Thanks for helping out with this need.  Here is the information that I need your help with:

Assignment #1
Two-Three paragraphs of content for each of the following areas:
1) Price Risk
2) Basis Risk

Outlines to Help Guide You When Writing
Price Risk
   Definition of price risk
   Volatility
   High-level discussion of how a trader/structurer will hedge against
   daily price movements
   Two or three examples showing how price movements affect a trader's
   position

Basis Risk
   Definition of a basis risk
   High-level discussion of how a trader/structurer will hedge against
   basis risk (i.e. what are the components of a deal that a
   trader/structurer must identify in order to effectively hedge basis
   risk)
   Two examples highlighting basis risk within a deal
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Assignment #2
Natural Gas Markets
   First few paragraphs on:
     What is Natural Gas a mixture of?
     Unit of Measures (Btu vs. cf, MMBtu vs. Mcf)
     Regulatory environment - how is it regulated?
   Three-four paragraphs on the following:
        Value Chain
        Production
        Gathering and processing
        Transportation
        Storage
        Distribution
        Consumption by Consumer Type (Residential, Commercial and Industrial)
   A couple of paragraphs on:
     Regional vs. Global Market -Where are each located?
   A couple of paragraphs on:
     Deregulation - timeline
     Level of liquidity in the market
     Volatility in this market

It would be great if I could get Assignment #1 sometime tomorrow, however, early next week is OK.  Assignment #2 is not as time sensitive and I would like to know if you think that it is even something you could respond to.  Please advise.

As we discussed, original is preferred, but certainly not necessary.  If you want to use other resources, please do so and footnote just your sources.  Also, if you need to postpone the options training class on 10/19 to respond to this request, please feel free to do so.  If you have any questions, please ask.

Thanks,
Ed
x37657


GO Doug Money.

-----Original Message-----
From: Schneider, Chip
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:28 AM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: Re: Duke Field Service

You have approval to submit a request to the cash committee via Doug Sewell.
Chip Schneider

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Peachy keen jelly bean!

   Kate Symes @ ECT                12/20/2000 10:17 AM

To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Hinson Power Company, Inc.

I've forwarded this e-mail to Christian and Greg. Unfortunately, the
population of the office is quickly dwindling as the holidays come near. I've
been told that one or the other of them will be in today, and I'll find out
if something has been sent out already, and if not, how soon we can do that.
I'll get back to you as soon as I talk to them.

Thanks,
Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
12/20/2000 07:30 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Hinson Power Company, Inc.

Hi Kate,
Deals #478168, 478944, 478945, 478946 are to be confirmed by either Greg
Wolfe or Christian Yoder.  We need to get the final copy of these confirm
letters so we can scan them into the system for our files.  Also, if the
finalized confirm has been sent to the counterparty we need to change the
status in the system.  These deals are still showing up on our "New" report
every morning and I need to do something with them.
Thanks for your help!
Kim


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Joseph H. Parks, Jr.
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Parks 101601
Report Total: $109.00
Amount Due Employee: $109.00

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Gerald,

The following is a list of the counterparties that we will be submitting
letter agreements to:
J.M. Huber Corporation
Patina Oil & Gas Corporation
FMI Weld LLC
Kennedy Oil Corporation
Dominion Oil & Gas Exploration
Tucson Electric (verify with Kim Ward)

Tyrell Harrison
303 575 6478


Just fyi -- Amabile did not present to Enron management as she was unavialable on the day of the meeting.  Some of her work was presented by her colleague and Enron Advisory Council member -- Pankaj Ghemewat.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	James, Terrie
Sent:	Friday, September 07, 2001 1:50 PM
To:	'tamabile@hbs.edu'
Cc:	Kean, Steven J.; Olson, Cindy
Subject:	Enron Management Conference

Professor Amabile,

I work for Enron, a leading energy company based in Houston.  I believe you recently presented some of your research on creativity and motivation to members of our management team.  I am responsible for preparing the business agenda for Enron's annual Management Conference.  Scheduled in San Antonio on November 15-16, the two-day meeting brings together more than 400 Enron executives.

Enron has been named most innovative company for six consecutive years by Fortune magazine.  However, this year has been challenging for the company.  External market issues and internal restructurings have resulted in a depressed stock price and low moral among employees.

Your insights on creating a motivating work environment and stimulating innovation would be especially interesting at this year's conference.  If you are interested in presenting to our group, I'd like to explore your availability the morning of Friday, November 16.

Please feel free to respond to my email or call me at 713-853-7727.  I look forward to hearing from you.

Terrie James
Senior Director, Public Relations
Enron Broadband Services
(ph) 713.853.7727
(fax) 713.646.3248
terrie.james@enron.com


Eric and Gerald,
I have received the following comments on the Avista Interconnect draft.  I
would like to review my responses (in preparation) with you shortly.

Thanks,
Greg
---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT on 01/02/2001
03:35 PM ---------------------------

HanshawS <HanshawS@PaceGlobal.com> on 01/02/2001 02:56:26 PM
To: "'Greg.Brazaitis@enron.com'" <Greg.Brazaitis@enron.com>
cc: "'milt.howard@avistacorp.com'" <milt.howard@avistacorp.com>
Subject: Avista - Brazos Valley Interconnect Agreement

Hope the new year is treating you well.

The Brazos Valley Project is moving forward and we would like to continue
our discussions to finalize the interconnect agreement with HPL.

Attached are comments for your review.

 - Comments 1.2.00.doc


April 17, 2001
Notice Number:  01-135

TO:
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
Proposed Amendment to COMEX Gold Supplement No. 3 &Approved Assayers for
Gold8 and COMEX Silver Supplement No. 4 &Approved Assayers for Silver.

The Exchange proposes to amend Supplement No. 3, &Approved Assayers for Gold8
of the Gold Futures Contract and Supplement No. 4, &Approved Assayers for
Silver8 of the Silver Futures Contract.  The proposed amendment adds Alex
Stewart (Assayers) Ltd. as an Approved Assayer for the COMEX Division,s Gold
and Silver Futures Contracts.

The proposed amendments must be approved by the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (&CFTC8) before becoming effective.  The Exchange membership will
be notified upon receipt of CFTC approval and the effective date of the
amendments.

A copy of the proposed amendments is attached.

If you have any questions, please contact Albert J. Getz at 212-299-2608.

Proposed Amendment. Underlining indicates additions and bracketing indicates
deletions.
Gold Supplement
No. 3
COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC.

APPROVED ASSAYERS FOR GOLD

Ledoux & Company
359 Alfred Avenue
Teaneck, NJ 07666
(Orders:  NJ (201) 837-7160)

Alex Stewart (Assayers) Ltd.
Caddick Road
Knowsley Industrial Estate
Knowsley
Merseyside L34 9ER
England
( Orders: 0151 548 7777 )

US LOCATION:
Alex Stewart (Assayers) Inc.
472 Westfield Avenue
Clark, NJ 07066
(Orders: (908) 827-0656)

A H Knight
Eccleston Grange
Prescot Road
St Helens
Merseyside
WA10 3BQ
England
(Orders: (01744) 733757)

US LOCATION:
A H Knight North America, Ltd.
PO Box 3504
130 Tradd Street
Spartanburg, SC 29304-3504
(Orders: (864) 595-1627)

Proposed Amendment. Underlining indicates additions and bracketing indicates
deletions.
Silver Supplement
No. 4
COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC.

APPROVED ASSAYERS FOR SILVER

Ledoux & Company
359 Alfred Avenue
Teaneck, NJ 07666
(Orders:  NJ (201) 837-7160)

Alex Stewart (Assayers) Ltd.
Caddick Road
Knowsley Industrial Estate
Knowsley
Merseyside L34 9ER
England
( Orders: 0151 548 7777 )

US LOCATION:
Alex Stewart (Assayers) Inc.
472 Westfield Avenue
Clark, NJ 07066
(Orders: (908) 827-0656)

A H Knight
Eccleston Grange
Prescot Road
St Helens
Merseyside
WA10 3BQ
England
(Orders: (01744) 733757)

US LOCATION:
A H Knight North America, Ltd.
PO Box 3504
130 Tradd Street
Spartanburg, SC 29304-3504
(Orders: (864) 595-1627)

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-135)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT on 07/27/2000 04:14
PM ---------------------------

John_Mable@dom.com on 07/27/2000 02:45:52 PM
To: ozzie.pagan@enron.com, Heather.kroll@enron.com, NWodka@bracepatt.com,
Dutch_Bumgardner@dom.com, Gary_Edwards@dom.com, Jeff_L._Jones@dom.com,
mjlafrat@mwbb.com, Greg_Morgan@dom.com, Tim_Talmadge@dom.com,
Ed_Roarty@dom.com
cc: Vern_Colbert@dom.com, John_Calder@dom.com
Subject: Edgecombe CT

Attached is a rough draft of the Agreement in blackline and clean copy
versions.
This draft has not been subject to Virginia Power's team review.

  (See attached file: VP black line draft july 27.DOC)(See attached file: VP
clean draft july 27.DOC)

 - VP black line draft july 27.DOC
 - VP clean draft july 27.DOC


Mike Day left me a message saying in discussions yesterday on AB 31X
(Wright's load curtailment bill), the utilities were making the point that
31x should only address bundled customers since the utilities were making the
incentive payments out of funds that would otherwise go to pay DWR  (in
effect, the curtailments are reducing the utility net short position).  They
were ok with having ESPs aggregate the loads of bundled customers (which will
be a very significant win, if we get it).   They think DA customers can get
curtailment benefits through existing (and new) ISO programs.

The dilemmas are:
the ISO programs may or may not be finalized for this summer and may or may
not give incentives that are as beneficial as AB31X
the utility plan discriminates against DA
preferably, the ISO would administer the programs described by AB31X for all
customers but that puts the ISO in the position of having to get approvals
from FERC for a CA-legislated program (they will have to do this anyway)
(nearly) all of our customers will be bundled this summer anyway, so there's
no immediate loss from going with the utility's position

We owe Mike an answer today.  Any thoughts?  My suggestion at this point is
to stick with the high road and argue for non-discriminatory treatment with
equal incentives paid to bundled and DA customers.

Background:  AB31X would give $500/mwh incentives for day ahead curtailment,
$750/mwh incentives for day-of curtailments, and incentives to be determined
for scheduled load reductions.  The ISO would invoke the programs based on
system conditions.

The ISO so far has put in place the equivalent of a scheduled load reduction
program, with specific payments, but has not finalized any day ahead or day
of programs.


Greg,

As you may know, Brad Romine's dot.com venture fell apart.

The offer from Enron looks much better now. I have arranged for him
a number of different interviews (including one with you). I think we should
not be too
punitive and give him the 2nd chance. I am also setting up for him interviews
with RAC
and EBS  and he should be able to negotiate a good first rotation.

Please, give me a call if you have any other question.

Vince Kaminski


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000
01:11 PM ---------------------------

J-P Bouchaud and M Potters <book@science-finance.fr> on 08/18/2000 09:45:47 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: New book out: Theory of Financial Risks

Dear colleague,

    you have recently downloaded a draft version of our book,
we are pleased to announce that it is now available in print:

*** THEORY OF FINANCIAL RISKS ***
>From Statistical Physics to Risk Management

by Jean-Philippe Bouchaud (Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique, Saclay)
and Marc Potters (Science & Finance)

Cambridge University Press (2000)
ISBN 0 521 78232 5

The book is available in bookstores in Europe and should be
available before October in the rest of the world. You can find out
more about it, including links to order it on-line, on our web site:
http://www.science-finance.fr/book.html

We wish you a pleasant reading,

Sincerely,

Jean-Philippe Bouchaud
and Marc Potters
--
Science & Finance -- Capital Fund Management
109-111 rue Victor Hugo  |  book@science-finance.fr
92532 Levallois          |  tel: +33.1.41.27.91.11
France                   |  fax: +33.1.47.39.04.47


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 07/06/99
03:24 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Office Chairman @ ENRON                           07/01/99 12:33 PM

To: Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Organizational Changes

Interoffice
Memorandum

Enron's performance has been exceptional.  This performance is reflected in
our stock price, in the recognition we receive in the media and financial
communities, and, most importantly, in the enthusiasm of our people.  It has
been clear to us for some time that we are driving fundamental change in the
marketplace and that our natural gas, electricity and communications networks
can be positioned for even greater growth.  A &new economy8 is emerging, an
economy based on intellectual capital and the compelling economics of
networks.  Capturing the opportunities in this new economy calls for
increased coordination and integration across our wholesale (ECT, ECM, EI),
retail (EES), and communications (ECI) businesses.  It is our intention to
combine the operations of these businesses into a cohesive organization that
will ensure we realize the growth we foresee in all our businesses.

To this end, we are initiating a number of organization and staffing changes
in these businesses and related changes in the Enron Office of the Chairman,
in Corporate Staff groups, and in a number of management/personnel
committees.  Other business units, EOG, GPG, PGE, and Azurix, will not be
directly affected.  Accordingly, the following changes are effective
immediately.

Enron Office of the Chairman

Joe Sutton will join the Office of the Chairman as Vice Chairman.  In his new
role, Joe will work with the two of us to manage the operations of the
company.

Rebecca Mark, previously Vice Chairman of the company, will now fully
concentrate on her responsibilities as Chairman and CEO of Azurix, our most
recent public company. Rebecca has also been elected to the Enron Board of
Directors, effective today.

Ken Harrison, previously Vice Chairman of the company, will fully concentrate
on his responsibilities as Chairman and CEO of Portland General Electric and
Non-Executive Chairman of Enron Communications.  Ken will continue to serve
on Enron's Board of Directors.

Redefined Business Units

ECT, ECM, EI, EES, and ECI will be regrouped into eight regions/businesses
and five global functions.  Each region/business will be operated as an
independent entity but will coordinate staffing, career paths, compensation
and performance review across all units.  Each global function will provide
its specialized expertise across all regions/businesses.  Included in these
functions is a new technology function, which will focus on information
systems and growth of our e-commerce capabilities where we believe there is
enormous potential.  These organizational units and their leadership are as
follows:

 Regions/Businesses

 North America:  Cliff Baxter, CEO; Kevin Hannon, COO
 Europe:  Mark Frevert, CEO; John Sherriff, President; Dan McCarty, COO
 South America: Jim Bannantine, Co-CEO; Diomedes Christodoulou, Co-CEO
 India:  Sanjay Bhatnagar, CEO
 Caribbean, Middle East:  David Haug, CEO
 Asia, Africa:  Rebecca McDonald, CEO
 EES:  Lou Pai, CEO; Tom White, Vice Chairman
 ECI:  Joe Hirko, Co-CEO; Ken Rice, Co-CEO (Ken Harrison ) non-executive
Chairman)

 Global Functions

 Risk Management:  Greg Whalley, CEO
 Finance:  Andy Fastow, CFO; Jeff McMahon, Treasurer
 Asset Operations:  Kurt Huneke, CEO
 EE&CC:  Larry Izzo, CEO
 Technology:  Mike McConnell, CEO

Corporate Staff

All corporate and EI staff units will be regrouped into six corporate staff
groups.  These staff groups will support all operations of Enron.  These
organizational units and their leadership are as follows:

 Legal:  Jim Derrick, EVP and General Counsel; Rob Walls, SVP and Deputy
General Counsel
 Risk Assessment and Control:  Rick Buy, EVP
 Accounting and HR:  Rick Causey, EVP and Chief Accounting Officer
 Investor Relations:  Mark Koenig, EVP
 Other Staff Groups:  Steve Kean, EVP and Chief of Staff
 Corporate Development:  To be determined.

Committees

A new Executive Committee will be formed to replace the existing Management
and Operating Committees.  Membership will be as follows:

 Ken Lay, Chairman
 Jeff Skilling, Alternate Chairman
 Joe Sutton
           Stan Horton
Jim Bannantine         Kurt Huneke
 Cliff Baxter         Larry Izzo
 Sanjay Bhatnagar        Steve Kean
Rick Buy         Mark Koenig
 Rick Causey         Rebecca Mark (Ad hoc)
 Diomedes Christodoulou        Mike McConnell
 Jim Derrick         Rebecca McDonald
 Andy Fastow         Jeff McMahon
 Peggy Fowler         Lou Pai
 Mark Frevert         Mark Papa (Ad hoc)
 Kevin Hannon         Ken Rice
 Ken Harrison         John Sherriff
 David Haug         Greg Whalley
 Joe Hirko         Tom White

Four other committees, which will be essential to the success of this new
organization, will be formed.  These committees are:

 Managing Director and SVP Personnel Committee:  Jeff Skilling, Chairman
 Vice President Personnel Committee:  Kevin Hannon, Chairman
 Vision and Values Committee: Joe Sutton, Chairman
 Workforce Diversity:  Ken Lay, Chairman

Details of membership on these committees will follow shortly.

Summary

Over the next several weeks all of the specifics of this reorganization will
be further ironed out and communicated.  In the meantime, please bear with us
-  we are confident that these changes will have a significant, positive
impact on the operation and growth of the company.


Per our discussions today, here is my understanding of the status of the
	implementation of the PGAS calculation for 31 Day Charts and & Meter Cards.

	Beginning with March Production (April Billing), GMS will have the new
	calculation in PGAS for 31 Day Charts and Meter Cards.  This calculation
	is to give NNG a better daily number to bill the customer.  Once the
	31 Day Charts are in, then they will be delineated with the fixed
	delineator.  The meter cards will use the calculation only.

	At this time there will NOT be a daily PGAS calculation for 7 day and 16 day
	charts.  These charts will be (1) tracked for timely receipt; and (2) integrated for
	daily volumes when received.

	Any charts received after the required deadline, will be processed as a PPA.

	Gary, if we need to clarify any of the above, please let me know.  If anyone has
	any questions, please let Gary or I know.  Thanks. Lynn


Dear icruise member,
I recently wrote you about our exciting new product, the icruise.com credit card! Today, I wanted to announce an additional enhancement that will make the icruise.com card "your card of choice". For a limited time only, you can now receive a 0% annual percentage rate (APR) for all purchases, cash advances and BALANCE TRANSFERS! Of course you will also receive icruiseMiles, usable towards the purchase of a cruise from icruise.com on up to ELEVEN different cruise lines. Add to that, No Annual Fee, No Blackout Dates and a credit line up to $100,000 and you have a credit card that really works for you! We will even give you 3,000 icruiseMiles FREE after first use of the card. Click here to apply now! <http://credit.i-cruise.com>
  <http://www.i-cruise.com/images/signature_small.jpg>
Alex Aliksanyan
President/CEO

P.S. I urge you once again to consider the benefits of 0% APR and icruiseMiles!
 icruise.com <http://www2.i-cruise.com/images/cc_email_icruiseheader.gif>
 left edge <http://www2.i-cruise.com/images/cc_email_leftedge.gif>	icruise credit card <http://credit.i-cruise.com> icruise credit card <http://www2.i-cruise.com/sweep2.htm>
sep <http://credit.i-cruise.com>

 icruise <http://www2.i-cruise.com/images/cc_emailhead.gif>
 icruise <http://www2.i-cruise.com/images/APR.gif>
 sep <http://www2.i-cruise.com/images/cc_email_arrow.gif>Earn 17,000 icruiseMiles and receive $500 towards your next
     cruise booked with icruise.com!
 sep <http://www2.i-cruise.com/images/cc_email_arrow.gif>Earn 27,000 icruiseMiles and receive $800 towards your next
     cruise booked with icruise.com!
 sep <http://www2.i-cruise.com/images/cc_email_arrow.gif>Get 3,000 icruiseMiles after your first transaction?
 sep <http://www2.i-cruise.com/images/cc_email_arrow.gif>Earn two icruiseMiles for every dollar charged at icruise.com
 sep <http://www2.i-cruise.com/images/cc_email_arrow.gif>Earn icruiseMiles for purchases you make with your
     icruise.com credit card
 plus <http://www2.i-cruise.com/images/cc_email_plus.gif>
Dollar rewards usable virtually on all major cruise lines
     booked on icruise.com.
No blackout dates
No annual fee
<http://credit.i-cruise.com>
 redemable on <http://www2.i-cruise.com/images/cc_logos2.gif>
Redeem icruiseMiles on:  redemable on <http://www2.i-cruise.com/images/cc_logos1.gif>

?Restrictions apply. icruiseMiles and discounts are provided by i-cruise.com corp. and apply only to bookings made through icruise.com and are the sole responsibilty of i-cruise.com corp. Full details accompany the credit card. Program terms subject to change and void where prohibited by law. MBNA, MBNA America and Platinum Plus are service marks of MBNA America Bank, N. A. Visa is a federally registered service mark of Visa U.S.A. Inc., and is used by MBNA pursuant to license. All other trademarks or sevicemarks are property of their respective owners. There are costs associated with the use of this credit card. You may contact the issuer and administrator of the program, MBNA America Bank, to request specific information about the cost by clicking on the above URL, calling 1-800-932-2775 or writing to: MBNA America, PO Box 15020, Wilmington, DE 19850 ?2002 MBNA America Bank, N.A. 	? spacer <http://www2.i-cruise.com/images/spacer.gif> right edge <http://www2.i-cruise.com/images/cc_email_rightedge.gif>	? icruise.com <http://www2.i-cruise.com/images/cc_email_footer.gif>	???To take your self off our specials mailing list please click here <http://www2.i-cruise.com/unsubscribe.htm> and follow instructions.


here is cgpr, also please email this group below - publications@enerdata.com
and get them to send this to you and I directly.  Thanks.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2001
08:24 AM ---------------------------
From: Jackson Logan/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 08:21 AM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: May 2001 CGPR

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "publications@enerdata.com" <publications@enerdata.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22publications+40enerdata+2Ecom+22+20+3Cpublications+40ene
rdata+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 10:33 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:;@ENRON
Subject: May 2001 CGPR

 - cgprMay01.pdf


Dean Muesing
120 Chaucer Ct.
Mankato, MN
thorsing@mctcnet.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Dean Muesing


We are pleased to announce that Dave Duran will replace Janet Dietrich to
co-lead the East Power Wholesale business at Enron.  Dave will continue to
run the highly successful Generation Investments business.

The East Power team will continue to have a single income statement and joint
accountability toward its financial goals as was set out in the
reorganization in late 2000.

Within Dave's Generation Investments group; Michael J. Miller will lead the
effort to acquire new QF projects, Chuck Ward will lead the restructuring
efforts on existing QF projects, and Carl Tricoli will lead the initiative to
develop and market capital products to IPP's.  In addition, Mitch Robinson
will lead a new initiative to evaluate opportunities with coal fired
generation.  Dave and Kevin Presto will attempt to leverage the Generation
Investments business and the Origination activities through a tighter
integration between the two groups.

Dave has over nine years of direct experience in gas and power origination at
Enron including an outstanding performance over the last couple of years
building the Generation Investments business.  He also spent two years
managing Enron's Retail Gas Marketing business in Dublin, Ohio.

The East Power group has had a great start to the year and we feel confident
that the leadership team of Kevin and Dave will lead to continued success.


>  <<Enron West Desk Only.xls>>
> You have recently signed up for OATI Digital Certificates.  As you
> probably already know, by March 6, 2002, the OATI ETS (E-Tag) System will
> require secure access using an OATI Digital Certificate.  However, because
> we have a large number of customers, we will be systematically setting up
> our customers that are already prepared to begin using their Digital
> Certificates with E-Tag version 1.67 starting in early January.
> Therefore, as you are one of our customers that is already prepared, we
> contacting you to set you up as soon as possible.
>
> To begin using Digital Certificates with E-Tag 1.67 (and 1.7 after March
> 6th), we must link each ETS User login to a Digital Certificate.  The
> attached spreadsheet contains an up to date list of your users in our ETS
> (E-Tagging) System.   Once you issue Digital Certificates to all of your
> company's users and install the Digital Certificates in their browsers,
> please complete the attached spreadsheet and submit it to
> support@oatiinc.com.  Once we are ready to activate your company to use
> Digital Certificates, we will contact you via e-mail to make sure you are
> ready also.
>
> If you have any questions or would like more information, please feel free
> to contact me.
>
> Thank You,
> OATI Support.
>
>
> Mary Tollefson
> Support Technician
> Open Access Technology Int'l, Inc.
> (763) 553-2725 Phone
> (763) 553-2908 Fax
> Mary.Tollefson@oatiinc.com
>
> CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION:  This email and any attachment(s) contain
> confidential and/or proprietary information of Open Access Technology
> International, Inc.  Do not copy or distribute without the prior written
> consent of OATI.  If you are not a named recipient to the message, please
> notify the sender immediately and do not retain the message in any form,
> printed or electronic.
>
>


We have been asked to set this entity up for financial trading.  It's part of
our JV with Texaco.  Hal Bertram (X31865) is a good contact person if you
have questions about the Bridgeline companies.  Thanks.  Sara


If we do take over this type of role, what issues and information would the NYISO be entitled to?  We are pushing DG and load curtailment very actively.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fromer, Howard
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 9:21 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: NYISO Letter to Richard Ring - EES Control of Generation

Yes. We informed the ISO in late September, I believe, that EES had not been involved in any of the enumerated types of activities they asked about. Paul Darmitzel was the EES lawyer who worked on the matter.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 3:59 PM
To:	Fromer, Howard
Subject:	NYISO Letter to Richard Ring - EES Control of Generation

Howard --

Did we deal with the EES letter from NYISO MMU?  Pls let me know.

Jim


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001
12:59 PM ---------------------------

Stacey Vallejo
02/01/2001 12:35 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Deals needing to be flipped to FT-US/CAND-ERMS book today

Just a quick reminder to please go into your books and flip all the ECC deals
to the FT-US/CAND-ERMS book by the end of today for both January and February
start dates.

I've shown Sherry Dawson a quick way of finding deals that might be missed in
TAGG, so please see her if you have questions on this.

Please let me know when all the January deals have been fixed so I can start
the invoicing process.

Thanks for your help.
Stacey


Here is my proposed response.  Let me know if you want to mention the last
item or not.  Thanks.

Mike, I agree on having the trading attorneys continue to work on
transactional work in Bolivia.  I also agree with Fede that to the extent a
supply contract or off-take agreement is part of an overall financing
agreement that the work ought to remain with the attorney in charge if
overseeing the all the documentation for the project.  As always though we
would be available to review provisions or answer any questions regarding
Enron's position on trading issues.  Additionally, it may be possible that in
the future a trading attorney in Brazil may be available to handle Bolivian
issues as well.
Brent

---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
14/02/2000 01:44 PM ---------------------------

	Enron International

	From:  Federico Cerisoli                           11/02/2000 07:23 PM

To: Michael Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Randy Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sami
Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Novak/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Taylor@ECT, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re:

I agree.  One little comment.  Though the transactional legal work should
remain in Argentina, as an exemption, I would suggest to use Brazilian
resources for "project financeable" gas supply agreements.
Fede

Michael Guerriero

02/10/2000 05:50 PM

To: Randy Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sami
Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Novak/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Taylor@ECT, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Federico
Cerisoli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject:

I like to convey my thoughts regarding Bolivia legal responsibilities in
light of the recent adjustments in commercial responsibility for Bolivia gas
supply. As of today we have moved all responsibility for Bolivian natural gas
supply and projects into the wholesale group under Fede. We have also moved
Gaby over to support the effort.

In light of the need for my group to focus on making the Argentine commercial
markets a success and the wholesale groups need to support the projects I
would like to propose that all Bolivian project related legal work go to John
Novak's group and  all transactional Bolivian legal work (sales and
purchases) remain in Argentina.

I believe this division of responsibilities leverages off everyone expertise
and eliminates the bottle necks we are having in Argentina regarding the
project work. It will also allow the Bolivian commercial people to be
supported best with their respective local legal talent.

Please let me know your thoughts.

MFG


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/15/2001
07:59 PM ---------------------------
From: Leslie Lawner on 04/13/2001 02:35 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RESUME

I am sending you the resume of Jennifer Salisbury who is Energy Sec. here in
NM and I think she is great!  She is looking to move back into the private
sector, and if we have an opening or can help her with one, that would be
wonderful.  Thanks.
----- Forwarded by Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron on 04/13/01 02:29 PM -----

	"Salisbury, Jennifer" <JSalisbury@state.nm.us>
	04/13/01 01:24 PM

		 To: "'llawner@enron.com'" <llawner@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RESUME

 <<jenbio revised_.doc>>  Leslie -- Thanks a million for getting back to me
so quickly.  Yes, I'd be willing to relocate.  I'm more interested in how
challenging the work would/could be (and the level of pay) then where I am
physically located.  Attached is my resume.  Feel free to send it to the
headhunter who called you and/or to anyone you think might be interested at
Enron.  Jennifer

PS  I had never talked to Schaefer before the Boise meeting.  He was not
very impressive and I agree with your assessment that you will not be able
to persuade him on the price cap issue.

 - jenbio revised_.doc