----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/14/2001 06:09 PM -----

	Scott Stoness@EES
	Sent by: Rosalinda Tijerina@EES
	04/13/2001 01:51 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES,
jbennett@gmssr.com@ENRON, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Re: Meeting 8AM Central Monday

The dial-in number is listed below (for Monday, April 16 at 8:00 a.m. (CST).

James D Steffes@ENRON
04/13/2001 01:15 PM
To: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES,
jbennett@gmssr.com, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Meeting 8AM Central Monday

Scott --

Can your assistant get a call in # for those in CA?

Jim

Scott Stoness@EES
04/13/2001 12:00 PM
To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, jbennett@gmssr.com@ENRON, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie
Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: Meeting 8AM Central Monday

We have agreed on a strategy, subject to Whaley/Delaney approval, to:
Scott Stoness submit testimony today advocating 2 part real time pricing in CA
Read other parties testimony this weekend from the perspective "Has somebody
filed testimony close enough to Stoness testimony, that we can cross examine
and brief to a favorable outcome?"
Meet on Monday at 8AM to decide whether to rescind Stoness's testimony.

The following dial in number and code corresponds to the Monday 8AM Central
Time meeting.
1 800 713 8600
68266 is PIN
Scott Stoness is host

Action Items:
All on To list above read and have opinion on 2 and 3 above
All on To list above meet on Monday at 8AM.  Meet in Stoness office if
possible.
Harry and Jeane polish Stoness testimony and wait to the last minute before
submitting it
Jeane ensure all on this To list get a copy of testimony, emailed as soon as
she gets it.

Scott Stoness


Attached is the Yates Contract Price Renegotiation Letter.  Let me know if
you have any questions.


In light of the tragic events in New York City and Washington, DC, there is a national call for blood donations.  Enron is taking two actions:

	1.	The City of Houston is sponsoring a city-wide blood drive at the George R. Brown Convention Center today.  For your convenience, Enron is providing transportation to and from the Convention Center from 9am-3pm.  Transportation will be leaving from the Enron Building every half hour.  We have been informed that there is a 3 - 4 hour wait.

	2.	Enron's regularly scheduled blood drive is being held on Thursday, September 13, from 7 a.m. until 4 p.m.  Two mobile units from the M. D. Anderson Blood Center will be parked outside the Enron Building on Andrews Street to accommodate donors.  Call the Enron Health Center at ext. 3-6100 to schedule an appointment.  Information regarding Enron's blood drive program and eligibility criteria is location on the Wellness webpage http://hrweb.enron.com/wellness/healthService/bloodDrive.asp

Our latest information is that three busloads of Enron employees have already been taken to the Convention Center and many of you have already scheduled appointments for Thursday.  We commend all of you for your community spirit.


I believe this is the best choice-  Great hotel, close to town with golf, tennis, fishing right there.   The rooms are great and the beach is awesome.  Check it out!!!  Let me know what you think and we'll book it.

http://www.mexicotravelnet.com/loscabos/hotels/meliasanlucas.htm

http://www.cabofishingvacations.com/melia.htm


Max brought to my attention the fact that some of  you are not receiving the
weekly report. I am sending you the report from the  last two weeks, along
with an analysis of the elections, and starting Monday you  will receive it
directly on a regular basis.
?
Thank you and I apologize for the inconvenience.
 - Weekly1.doc
 - Weekly2.doc
 - Fox.doc


Hi Cindy,

Would it be possible to block some rooms for a couple of weeks while people
make their reservations?  I'm thinking maybe ten rooms for May 4, 5, and 6,
out on the 7th?  I would like it best if the individuals could call you
directly to make the reservation.  How does that work for you?

Thanks,

Kay

"Cindy Viator" <cindyv@lakeaustin.com> on 02/23/2001 02:33:04 PM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Lake Austin Spa Resort

Contact: Kay Mann

email: kay.mann@encore.com

Getaway package May 4, 2001

Includes six (6) private signature or premier room. Three healthy gourmet
meals daily, unlimited fitness classes, activities and discovery programs.
Spa  services and personal fitness instructions are available a la carte.

Two Nights, Private Accommodations:

Signature Room $720* per person

Premier Room $820* per person

Three Nights, Private Accommodations:

Signature Room $1,080* per person

Premier Room $1,230* per person

*rates do not include 6% tax and 18% service charge and is
non-commissionable. These rates will only apply to a group of six or more
people visiting during the dates listed above.

Private activities such as boat cruises, hikes, yoga classes or kayak  outing
are also available at additional charges.

Deposit:

A $500 per person pre-payment is due at the time of  booking. Payments can be
made by persona, corporate, or cashiers check, Visa,  Mastercard, Discover,
Diners Club or American Express.

Cancellations:

Cancellations made 45 days or more in advance will receive  a full refund of
the pre-payment. Reservations cancelled 44 - 15 days or less  prior to
arrival will be non-refundable but we will hold the pre-payment amount  for
up to one year to be used at a later date. Reservations cancelled 14 days or
less prior to arrival will forfeit the entire pre-payment amount.

Please review this proposal and call me at  your earliest convenience with
any questions and/or comments. I will be happy to  help customize a package
to fit the particular needs of your guests.

Sincerely,

Cindy Viator

Sales/Marketing

cindyv@lakeaustin.com

800-847-5637

?

[IMAGE]?
 - lasr.jpg


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/17/99
03:16 PM ---------------------------

Clayton Vernon@ENRON
12/16/99 01:59 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Vince and Vasant:

Here is a brief summary of my meeting with Chris Germany, Capacity Trader at
the East Desk, related to gas transmission:

Typically, pipelines lease capacity billed on a monthly basis. An example
might be the pipeline between South Texas and Brooklyn, where you might pay
$12.00 per month per 10,000 decatherms of capacity ($0.40 per day), a fixed
payment. Variable charges are 6% for fuel costs ("shrinkage") and 6.5% for
overhead expenses.  A gas trader might call South Texas and be quoted a
delivery price tomorrow of NYMEX - $0.10 ("basis"), and might call Brooklyn
and be quoted a delivered price of NYMEX + $0.25 .  The trader's spread is
$0.35, and variable costs of transmission are $0.125, so the trader would
offer the leaseholder of capacity up to $0.225 for firm capacity tomorrow.
As for the distinction betweem firm and interruptible, the leaseholders have
an excellent knowledge of the firm-equivalent of interruptible capacity.
Also, many pipelines don't discount firm capacity from the tariff maximum
("it's not worth their time to haggle") (There is a further issue of
"secondary markets" not important to the model yet).  For South Texas and
Brooklyn, there are several different routes the gas can physically take
(pipelines of Enron, Texas Eastern, etc).  And, once the trade is in the
system traders can cover the (Enron) positions on each end of the pipeline,
in so doing freeing up the capacity for other contracts.

Clayton


There are several outstanding issues currently with Tenaska--the most
significant being their change in ownership.  They are no longer an
affilitate/sub of Illinova Corp. (As Illinova has been acquired by Dynegy),
but have now seperated into the entities Tenaska Energy, Inc. and Tenaska
Energy Holdings (their financials are combined).  The Guarantor is
collectively both entities.

I'm currently working on amending the Master Swap Agreement, as the credit
support provider has changed.  Preliminary revised thresholds are between
$5-10MM.  ENA has not Mac'd the counterparty b/c the Illinova's gty, etc.
will remain acitve until April 01.  Nontheless, we need to amend accordingly
ASAP.  Our current Financial MTM is $9MM.  I will also contact the physical
legal group to have a new contract issued out (as we have an old 91 Master
Physical Gas contract).

On the physical side, attached below is a breakdown of our positions.  Please
note that we have formal gas netting agreements for the ENA business:

As you can see, the majority of the exposure is with the Canadian sales to
their Canadian affitliate.  Also note that all of this business is still
gty'd by Illinova until April 01.

An important note here is that I received a gty from the new guarantors today
in the amount of $20MM, covering Enron Corp and all of its' subs.  It covers
the physical business of Tenaska Marketing Ventures, Tenaska Marketing
Canada, a Division of TMV Corp., and Tenaska Gas Storage, LLC.  Tenaska is
also doing business with EES.  Once the ISDA is amended, the new financial
gty's will be issued out accordingly.  Also, I'm working with Global
Counterparty to change the system accordingly.

I will keep you all updated on any changes/progress.   Please let me know if
I've left anything out.

Veronica


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/08/2000 11:14 AM -----

	Sanjay Bhatnagar@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	11/08/2000 12:41 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Draft of organization announcement

Steve:

I am discussing this draft below with Jeff Skilling. The present draft was
not agreed with me. I will get back wih you after my discussion with him.

Sanjay Bhatnagar, currently CEO of Enron India, has joined EBS as CEO for the
Middle East and Asia region. Sanjay will be responsible for building our
broadband business in this region and the current EBS team in the region will
report to Sanjay.  In this role, Sanjay will report to the EBS office of the
Chairman.  In addition, Sanjay will continue to remain responsible for Enron,
s wholesale energy business in India and will work at transitioning this
business into Enron Global Assets by March 31st, 2100 and integrating the
India Communication business into EBS.

Sanjay


Gentlemen,

Please see the attached production report - note the comment under
"DOWNTIME" at the end of the report.  It indicates Wildhorse pulled out a
compressor last week at the San Arroyo Plant and our pressures have
increased.   We are trying to get more information and will pass it along
when we get it.

Ken Krisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 7:21 AM
To: Ken
Subject: FW: Production Report

-----Original Message-----
From: Dreineke@aol.com [mailto:Dreineke@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 1:48 AM
To: jjosborne@apex2000.net
Cc: Arvel.Martin@enron.com
Subject: Production Report

Attached is the production report.
We are still having high line pressures.
I will call you after I speak with Wildhorse this morning.
Dan

 - SASEP30-2000.xls


Please join me in congratulating Laura Wente on her recent promotion to
Manager.  Laura will continue to work in the West Origination Group here in
Portland.

Congratulations, Laura!

Regards,

Chris


Mike is going to leave you a message discussing the attached earnings outlook
for EGM.    Call me if you want to discuss further.


Joe - should I get some lunch ordered? Rick


Everyone,

Paul Flack called from the courthouse at 3:40.  The Judge had taken a break, and they were to reconvene in a few minutes.  Paul said it was going well, but would likely last for some time longer.  Apparently there are around 50 lawyers in the court room.

I will send you an email as soon as the hearing is concluded, or, if I receive another update from the courthouse, I will pass that along as well.

In the meantime, please don't hesitate to call me if you need to.

Terri Richardson
(713) 654-7610
Assistant to J.C. Nickens

This e-mail and any attached files may be confidential and subject to attorney/client privilege. If you received it in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail or by calling (713)654-7600.


what is this transmission for?  how critical is it?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thome, Stephen
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:51 PM
To:	Schneider, Chip; Calger, Christopher F.
Cc:	Helton, Susan; Gorte, David; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Aucoin, Evelyn; Plauche, Stephen; Belden, Tim
Subject:	APS Transmission Invoice

Chip,

I have a new critical vendor with a prepetition invoice.  Arizona Public Service provides us critical transmission between the major trading points in the Southwest.  We owe them $43,708.60 for November transmission charges.  They will cut us if we do not pay.  I have explained that this payment needs to go through the creditor's cash approval process.

They can cut us starting tomorrow, but have agreed to a stay if we pay our December invoice of $8,071.20.  I will be faxing this invoice for immediate payment.

Steve


Glad to see you're having so much fun with this.  I've been here 5.5 years
with nothing and then in one week I'm in Fortune and Time.  Pretty funny.
Things are going well here .  The big E just chugging along, bringing the
stock price with it.  Wish I could tell you everything new in my life, but I
think I just did.
Your long lost buddy,
John

Heather Robertson <hrobertson@hbk.com> on 08/31/2000 10:10:09 AM
To: john.arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Young John?

Is this "the 26-year-old chief of natural-gas derivatives"?  If so, you
should write me back after you complete your "nine hours and $1 billion in
trades" today!!   Does this mean I have to start calling you "Mr. John"?!
It was great to see you're doing so well....
Your long lost buddy,
Heather

Heather Lockhart Robertson
HBK Investments LP
Personal:
214.758.6161 Phone
214.758.1261 Fax
Investor Relations:
214.758.6108 Phone
214.758.1208 Fax


Geriann,

I didn't ask for the conference call, but I wil make time in my schedule to
participate.

From: Geriann Warner on 03/07/2001 09:03 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Conf. Call  - 3/7 @ 10:00 cst: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of
Engagement

Kay, please let me know if you still need this conference call.  Jim Steffes
can do it at 10:00 a.m.

Per Marchris' request, I've set up a conference call for today at 10:00 cst.
Please let me know ASAP if you WILL NOT be able to participate.

Call in  - 1.800.998.2462

Pass code  - 5058917

Geriann Warner
GA - The Americans
Tel: 713-853-5036
Fax: 713-853-7297

----- Forwarded by Geriann Warner/NA/Enron on 03/07/2001 08:30 AM -----

	Marchris Robinson
	03/06/2001 05:19 PM

		 To: Geriann Warner/NA/ENRON@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Set up conference call.  Page me with info.

MR
----- Forwarded by Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron on 03/06/2001 05:18 PM -----

	Kay Mann
	03/06/2001 04:57 PM

		 To: Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Ben and I can make it.

Kay

From: Marchris Robinson on 03/06/2001 04:30 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

I think we should do a phone conference to resolve the outstanding issues
regarding the engagement of "local lobbying firms" by ENA.  I will schedule a
call for tomorrow at 10:30am (cst).  Please advise if that time works with
your schedule.  Thanks.

Marchris
----- Forwarded by Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron on 03/06/2001 04:21 PM -----

	Kay Mann
	03/06/2001 09:27 AM

		 To: Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Hi Marchris,

I'm in ENA Legal, and I'm looking for the right person to discuss this with.
Christi Nicholay suggested I get you involved.  Please give me a call at 713
345 7566 to discuss.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/06/2001 09:29
AM ---------------------------

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
03/05/2001 10:48 AM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

OK. This guy's a lawyer by training, but we're hiring him as a lobbyist.
Roger was previously looking into this, and proposed our standard form
agreement. Steve and I were wondering if we could work off of Tripp Scott's
proposed form, considering that he will not be representing us as our counsel.

Please let me know.

Thanks,

Ben

Kay Mann@ENRON
03/04/2001 02:27 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Ben,

What are these folks supposed to do for Enron?  I had heard a rumor that we
were looking to hire someone to lobby for us on a success fee basis.  Is this
the same deal?  I know on the international side there were hoops to jump
through before such an engagement could be signed off on.  I'll have to check
to see what the drill is on this side of the street.

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           02/28/2001 12:18 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann
cc:

Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Per my earlier e-mail, attached is Tripp Scott's form.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001 12:17 PM
---------------------------

Steven Krimsky@ENRON
02/28/2001 09:11 AM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

As discussed, Roger has no problem engaging Tripp Scott.  He does want to use
Enron's standard 9 page engagement letter in lieu of the attached 2 pager
received from Tripp Scott.  Is this necessary - any thoughts?

Steve

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001
09:08 AM ---------------------------

Steven Krimsky
02/16/2001 03:44 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog@ECT, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

As discussed in Fort Pierce, Tripp Scott is that insurance policy I've been
looking for to help secure the commission vote in Pompano.  Tripp Scott will
also assist us in our door knock campaign in the County & Tallahassee.
Pozzuoli is a mover & shaker and is on a first name basis with Jeb Bush -  he
was the Chairman for the Bush/Cheny Broward County re-count.

Bill Keith & Debbie Orshefsky highly recommends the engagement.

Lets discuss Tuesday.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron on 02/16/2001
03:38 PM ---------------------------

"Edward J. Pozzuoli (Paulette R Segal)" <PRS@trippscott.usa.com> on
02/14/2001 01:56:42 PM
To: steven.krimsky@enron.com
cc: TSCS.TSCS-1.ejp@mail4.allegro.net

Subject: Proposed Terms of Engagement

It was a pleasure meeting with you and Debbie on Monday afternoon.  Per our
discussion, enclosed is Tripp Scott's proposed terms of engagement as well as
an abbreviated description of the firm and its key directors.

I look forward to speaking with you soon.

Ed
 - 239299.WPD
 - 239243.WPD


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000
08:36 AM ---------------------------

TIM HEIZENRADER
04/25/2000 11:43 AM
To: Jim Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Western Strategy Session Materials

Today's charts are attached:


I have entered a one month deal in Sitara - deal # 416019 for referenced sale

This delivery is subject to an external expense transport fee to Entex - see
old deal Sitara 93471 for details

Fee to Entex is 5 cents

PLEASE :  someone enter this transport info into deal # 416019 as I don't
know how/what to do ....

Lee
3.5923


I took all of your good suggestions and incorporated them.  I also reordered
a few of the paragraphs and trimmed some of the language.  Look at it again
and see if we've got a pretty good work product.  Thanks!!!

Susan Scott
11/21/2000 11:13 AM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Caithness proposal


I will be out of the office starting  04/16/2001 and will not return until
04/23/2001.

I will respond to your message when I return.  If you need immediate
assistance, please call my assistant, Erica Braden x36666.


Dear Lucy:

Our financial council considers that there should be no problem to
include your comments in the guaranty form, although it has to be
authorized by the corporate council.  We are currently working on that
authorization and will let you know as soon as we have an answer.

Best regards,
Martha Navarro

-----Original Message-----
From: Lucy.Ortiz [mailto:Lucy.Ortiz@enron.com]
Sent: Lunes, 27 de Agosto de 2001 04:19 p.m.
To: Martha Navarro-Maldonado; Alejandro Reyes-Ventura
Cc: Lucy.Ortiz; Craig.Breslau; Marie.Heard
Subject: FW: Pemex Guaranty
Importance: High

Martha & Alex,

De acuerdo a su solicitud, anexo les envio los comentarios de Enron
sobre la garantia.   Les agradezco su pronta respuesta.
Estoy a sus ordenes para cualquier commentario al respecto.

Lucy Ortiz
713.853.3238

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Heard, Marie
> Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 10:54 AM
> To:	'mmax@'
> Cc:	Breslau, Craig; Ortiz, Lucy
> Subject:	FW: Pemex Guaranty
> Importance:	High
>
> Ms. Marquez:
>
> I am following up regarding the status of our comments to the form of
> guaranty for Pemex that you provided to Lucy Ortiz.  Please do not
> hesitate to contact either Francisco Pinto-Leite or me with any
> questions or comments.  We look forward to hearing your comments.
>
> Marie Heard
> Senior Legal Specialist
> Enron North America Corp.
> Phone:  (713) 853-3907
> Fax:  (713) 646-3490
> marie.heard@enron.com
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Heard, Marie
> Sent:	Monday, July 23, 2001 10:15 AM
> To:	'mmax@'
> Cc:	Vanek, Darren; Ortiz, Lucy; Breslau, Craig; Leite, Francisco
> Pinto
> Subject:	Pemex Guaranty
> Importance:	High
>
> Ms. Marquez:
>
> Attached are an original and blacklined copy of your form of guaranty,
> which reflect our comments.  Please do not hesitate to contact either
> Francisco Pinto-Leite, Senior Counsel (713/345-7942;
> francisco.pinto.leite@enron.com) or me with any questions or comments.
> Thank you for your assistance.
>
> Marie Heard
> Senior Legal Specialist
> Enron North America Corp.
> Phone:  (713) 853-3907
> Fax:  (713) 646-3490
> marie.heard@enron.com
>
>
> 				 <<pemexguaranty.1.doc>>
> <<PEMEXGUARANTY.1.RED.DOC>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution
or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please
contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to
be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding
and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates)
and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on
by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank
you.
**********************************************************************

 - WINMAIL.DAT


Hey Jason,

How are you DaDragon?  I'm doing great.  I emailed you with this account
and datiger12@hotmail.com but your hotmail account kept rejecting my
accounts.  I think you put a block on them.  Anyway, that's great to hear
that you have a great job at Enron.  Is that in Houston right?  If it is,
maybe we can go out for a drink or something?  I know a few places to go
hehehe.

Stocks are bad right now so I don't mess around with them.  Don't assume
that these companies are at rock bottom simply because they are so
low.  They could go lower.  I would wait until things clear up.

Aight, I'll check with you later.  Nice to hear from you again.

Minh

On Thu, 29 Mar 2001 Jason.Wolfe@enron.com wrote:

> DaTiger,
>
> Are you still around, answering email on this account? I can't remember
> your hotmail account.
> Was it DaTiger12? I am at Enron, working in Energy Trading. What are you up
> to?
> Write back dude, and give me some good stock picks now that my Ameritrade
> account is up.
>
> Jason
>
>

DaTiger

HAVE A NICE DAY!

Bye :)


Kevin,

Thanks for the clarification.  Can you tell me if the following assumptions are correct for your pricing?

1.	Minimum volume transported is 0, maximum is 200,000/day
2.	365 days / year for 2 years

Thanks for your help.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hyatt, Kevin
Sent:	Tuesday, July 24, 2001 6:40 PM
To:	Kiani-Aslani, John
Subject:	RE: Backhaul Rates from NNG to Waha

John, I had NNG price out volume of 200,000/day for a two year term.  Let me know if you need further info.
kh
x35559

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kiani-Aslani, John
Sent:	Tuesday, July 24, 2001 6:14 PM
To:	Hyatt, Kevin
Cc:	Higgins, Ned; Druzbik, Lisa
Subject:	Backhaul Rates from NNG to Waha

Kevin,

I work with Ned Higgins in Enron Compression Services.  He informed me of some transportation quotes that you had given to him for FT from Mid 4 to Mid 3, as well as IT to El Paso Waha.  Can you please tell me if there are any minimum or maximum volumetric requirements under these prices, and the term that your pricing applies to?

Please feel free to call me if you have any questions.

Thanks in advance for your help.

John Kiani
Associate - Enron Compression Services
(W) 713-345-3905


[IMAGE]
	 [IMAGE]
	 Performance-Based Ratemaking & Business Strategy Implications December 5-7, 2001 ? The Lantham Hotel ? Washington, DC Click Here to Download a Complete Conference Brochure
	 [IMAGE]
 [IMAGE]	 Performance-Based Ratemaking & Business Strategy Implications is designed to provide you with the most up-to-date information and insights you need to develop an effective PBR strategy. A sequel to our successful Chicago and Boston conferences, it emphasizes the latest developments in PBR for electric and natural gas utilities.  Learn How Electric and Natural Gas Utilities Can Use PBR Plans to:   Become World Class Transmission and Distribution Companies  Improve Traditional Bundled Power Service Regulation  Meet the Challenge of Energy Procurement in Today's Markets  Profit from Overseas Operations
	 [IMAGE]
 California Public Utilities Commission - Office of Ratepayer Advocates EPCOR Distribution Mexican Energy Regulatory Commission National Grid USA Netherlands Electricity Regulatory Service New York State Department of Public Service  	 Northern States Power Company Ontario Energy Board Pacific Economics Group Pacific Gas and Electric Company Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Portland General Electric Sempra Energy Slover & Loftus U.S. Telephone Association
	 [IMAGE]
	 Statistical Benchmarking for Power Distribution 1:00 PM to 5:00 PM ? Wednesday, December 5, 2001
	 [IMAGE]
	 Click Here to Download a Complete Conference Brochure
	 Presented By Infocast


Please cancel out the short and long KM position in the Holdings section.

thanks.

Kevin Presto
Vice President, East Power Trading
Phone:  713-853-5035
Cell:  713-854-3923
Fax:  713-646-8272


Scott,

Not at all. I left to make a quick call and it required a number
of follow-up calls.

The presentation was very interesting and professional.

One of the guidelines we have in my group is to avoid using too many software
packages.
Otherwise, everybody will have his own pet package and we shall lose
economies of scale.

I shall talk to my associates about your product  and get back to you.

Vince

Scott Wakefield <scottw@mathworks.com> on 10/23/2000 12:09:46 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Meeting with you last week ?

Hello Vince,

I'm writing to follow up with you regarding our meeting last week.  Did we
do something wrong in our presentation or in the set up of this presentation?

For a group of 50 researchers we were expecting a larger crowd and also
some peole perhaps from your IT department.  Also when you left I was
wondering if we had offended you.

The ability to use our products to create open models, integrate databases,
C, VB, etc. and then quickly deploy them to others has been embraced by
the risk management world.  We met the following day with a large group
from EES and they seemed quite enthusiastic about the innovation possible
with our tools.

I realize you are quite busy, but could you please let me know what
happened and how we can prevent this in the future?

Thanks
Scott Wakefield


Any news
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


-----Original Message-----
From: 	CRCommunications <CRCommunications@caiso.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-CRCommunications+20+3CCRCommunications+40caiso+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, June 22, 2001 11:34 AM
To:	ISO Market Participants
Subject:	CAISO Notice: Update to June 20 Market Notice

 <<MARKET NOTICE 010622_.doc>>

Market Participants:
Please read the attached explanation of Footnote 14 in the California ISO
June 20, 2001, Market Notice.

CR Communications
Client Relations Communications

 - MARKET NOTICE 010622_.doc


Beth,

The mail room just dropped off your package about 30 minutes.

Liz
Assistant to Greg Whalley

"Beth Desmarais" <bdesmarais@sisystemsinc.com> on 10/31/2000 03:47:55 PM
Please respond to "Beth Desmarais" <bdesmarais@sisystemsinc.com>
To: <whalley@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: White Paper

Greg,
?
I had sent this white paper to Kenneth  Lay.?? When I followed up with him,
his office suggested that I send  you a copy of our Offshore Development
white paper.? Primarily, the white  paper addresses the reasons and cost
benefits to offshore development.?
?
SI Systems is an American company that specializes  in interfacing with
global development centers to provide American?project  management and
communications.? With the offshore model,  companies?reduce their IT
budgets?significantly and the fact that the  development is offshore is
transparent to our clients with SI Systems as the  interface team.?? Our
clients do not have to communicate after hours  with another country to
ensure their project is on track, we do that for  them.? Additionally, we
offer ethics regulation to ensure that our  customers receive fair?and
expected pricing throughout the project  lifecycle.
?
We have partnered with?10 of the best of breed  offshore companies to ensure
that?we?can provide?a  variety?of application development languages with the
best quality.?  Paul, I will follow up with you this week to see if?you?would
like to  explore this model further.?
?
High Regards,
?
Beth DesMarais
Founder - SI Systems, Inc.
914-644-8356

?
?


calendar fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/04/2001
03:02 PM ---------------------------
From: Joe Hartsoe on 05/03/2001 04:12 PM
To: Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nancy Bagot/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Benner/ENRON@enronXgate, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon
Brown/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet Butler/ENRON@enronXgate, Deb
Cappiello/ENRON@enronXgate, Alma Carrillo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet
Cones/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Cordes/ENRON@enronXgate, Shelley
Corman/ENRON@enronXgate, Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari
Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew
Fossum/ENRON@enronXgate, Ava Garcia/ET&S/Enron@Enron, John
Goodpasture/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/ENRON@enronXgate, Bambi Heckerman/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Theresa
Hess/ENRON@enronXgate, Staci Holtzman/ENRON@enronXgate, Stanley
Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve Hotte/ENRON@enronXgate, Rita
Houser/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Kilmer/ENRON@enronXgate, Frazier
King/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve Kirk/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim
Kissner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura Lantefield/ENRON@enronXgate, Terry
Lehn/ENRON@enronXgate, Teb Lokey/ENRON@enronXgate, Danny
McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dorothy McCoppin/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike W
McGowan/ENRON@enronXgate, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael P Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Sheila
Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Zelda Paschal/ENRON@enronXgate, Maria
Pavlou/ENRON@enronXgate, Keith Petersen/ENRON@enronXgate, Peggy
Phillips/ENRON@enronXgate, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Sawyer/ENRON@enronXgate, Donna
Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Emily
Sellers/ENRON@enronXgate, Sharon Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Cindy
Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James Studebaker/ENRON@enronXgate, Gina
Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen Veatch/ENRON@enronXgate, Ricki
Winters/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: FERC Tech. Conference on CA Natural Gas Transportation- 5/24

FYI
----- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 05/03/2001 04:11 PM -----

	epsa@mindspring.com
	05/03/2001 02:35 PM
	Please respond to epsa

		 To: jhartso@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC Tech. Conference on CA Natural Gas Transportation- 5/24

Today, FERC issed the attached notice of a technical conference on the
Californi
a natural gas transportation infrastructure, scheduled for May 24th.

 - pl01-4.000.doc


Good--the "to the extent that" phrase is appropriately ambiguous on what
actually happened--should make Harris happy.  DF

From: Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/23/2001 10:33 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Red Rock shipper letter

For your comments.


Just a brief Update for you this week, including the latest major news in
the Energy industry, and a complete rundown of our upcoming conferences for
anyone who is thinking of attending, including our latest addition of The
Business of Fuel Cells for Transportation in Michigan next Spring.  Over the
next few days, keep a particularly close eye on our coverage of the
unfolding Enron saga, as we will be bringing you some of the very latest
breaking news as it happens...

All that remains is to wish everyone in North America a very Happy
Thanksgiving from all of us at Eyeforenergy.  If you have any comments or
enquiries about this Update, drop us a line at
mailto:bruno@eyeforenergy.com.

CONTENTS:

   -  EVENTS UPDATE: New EyeforFuelCells event announced for Detroit, 2002

   -  RECENT HEADLINES

EVENTS UPDATE

* The Business of Fuel Cells for Stationary Applications
  Le Plaza Hotel, Brussels
  November 27-28 2001

Our sister company, EyeforFuelCells is giving away a FREE ticket each week
for this groundbreaking European conference in Brussels later this month.
Organisations who will be represented at this event include Gaz de France,
DuPont, Johnson Matthey, Global Thermoelectric, Alstom Ballard, Cogen
Europe, the World Fuel Cell Council, the European Commission, ZeTek Power
Products, Honda Europe Power Equipment, the Royal Military Academy of
Belgium, Chevron Texaco, Metasource, Nuvera Fuel Cells Europe,
Siemens-Westinghouse Power Corp, and many more.

To enter the draw and for more information, please visit:
http://www.eyeforfuelcells.com/

* EEO Europe: Energy Trading in the New Economy
  Amsterdam, 19-21 February 2002

Following up for our sell-out conference in Phoenix, December 2001 that was
attended by over 250 CEO's, senior executives and press, and Energy
Exchanges Online II:  Energy Trading in the New Economy USA (September
2001), Eyeforenergy brings you the premier networking and discussion
conference for the energy trading community.  Meet, do business and discuss
the big issues over 2 days with the leaders in energy trading in Amsterdam.

To find out more information, including discounts for pre-registration,
speaking, sponsoring and exhibiting opportunities, click here:
http://www.eyeforenergy.com/eurotrading/

* Emissions Trading 2002
  Okura Hotel, Amsterdam, 19-21 February 2002

Emissions trading options are ripe for the picking - so how can you make
sure you're ready to profit from GHG?  Let's face it - you can't really
afford not to be, especially as the World Bank has estimated demand in the
international GHG trading system to be in the order of US$20 billion per
annum by 2010.

Eyeforenergy is delighted to bring you this event which will focus on how
you can best seize this exciting nwe market opportunity.  As ever, the
conference will be driven by the industry leaders in this arena, backed up
by expert advice from those helping the indsutry make the right moves in
emissions.

Click here for further information:
http://www.eyeforenergy.com/emissions/

* Weather Trading 2002
  Okura Hotel, Amsterdam, 19-21 February 2002

Today's business is all about risk and how to mitigate it. Weather
derivatives has become one of the key tools industries as wide ranging at
utilities, airlines, and agriculture have at hand to off-set risks
associated with temperature and precipitation.  With over 70% of Europe's
companies facing weather-related risk, knowing about the latest advances in
weather trading is a necessity.

Eyeforenergy's latest event will be run in conjunction with our European
online trading conference, Energy Trading in the New Economy, and
Eyeforenergy's Emissions Trading 2002 event, so you can learn about the
latest developments in energy and emissions trading all under one roof.

Click here for further information:
http://www.eyeforenergy.com/weather/

* The Business of Fuel Cells for Transportation
  Dearborn Hotel, Detroit, Michigan
  April 30 - May 1, 2002

As manufacturers are increasingly developing technologies with the energy
industry, the auto industry is globalising at an unprecedented rate and both
OEMs and suppliers are renegotiating their alternative vehicle programs.
This event will examine all possible applications in teh transport industry
including synergies with hybrid automobiles and the potentially lucrative
APU market.

Fueling infrastructure will also be covered and, with BP recently launching
Hydrogen fueling stations in Singapore, this issure could not be more timely
or pertinent.  If you have a story to tell, a product to promote or would
simply like to get the full lowdown on the movers and shakers in the
industry then, if you're not already in Detroit, you'll certainly want to be
there in April 2002.

For more information, please visit:
http://www.eyeforfuelcells.com/

LATEST HEADLINES

Enron Deal on the Brink, Dynegy to Renegotiate Deal
http://www.eyeforenergy.com/content.asp?news=23227

AEP Ventures Into Renewable Energy
http://www.eyeforenergy.com/content.asp?news=23190

Shell Renewables Takes stake in U.S. Wind Power Market
http://www.eyeforenergy.com/content.asp?news=23057

General Motors Says Fuel Cells To Power Homes In Addition To Vehicles
http://www.eyeforenergy.com/content.asp?news=23052

NYMEX on a Roll, Sets Overnight Trading Record
http://www.eyeforenergy.com/content.asp?news=23051

Nuon Taps Sakonnet Technology's Trading and Risk Management Solution
http://www.eyeforenergy.com/content.asp?news=23144

------------------------------------------------------------
This update is provided as part of the Eyeforenergy Briefing service.  In
addition to these updates, you will receive a comprehensive newsletter every
other week, with fresh in-depth analysis, reports and insights into the
issues currently affecting different areas of the energy industry.

To subscribe,
email:   <mailto:energynews-subscribe-request@peach.ease.lsoft.com>
or alternatively send a message to
         <mailto:bruno@eyeforenergy.com?Subject=BriefingSubscribe>

To unsubscribe,
email: <mailto:energynews-signoff-request@peach.ease.lsoft.com>
or alternatively send a message to
       <mailto:bruno@eyeforenergy.com?Subject=BriefingUnSubscribe>


Any word on her review?  Let me know.  Thanks.

DG


Spoke with David Harvin, a senior litigator at V&E.  He believes it would be
prudent to call it an "apparent theft" in the two places where" theft"
appears in the release.  Accordingly, this change should be made and the
"analysts" script should be revised accordingly.  Please advise if there are
any questions. Thanks.  SWD

Scott Vonderheide@ENRON
02/23/2000 01:11 PM
To: Hardie Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Beth
Meyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gina Taylor/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Schafer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Burke/Houston/Eott@Eott, Lori
Maddox/Houston/Eott@Eott, Susan Ralph/Houston/Eott@Eott, Steve
Duffy/Houston/Eott@Eott, Dana Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott, Molly
Sample/Houston/Eott@Eott
cc:

Subject: EOTT fourth quarter earnings release

Attached is the most current release.  The second paragraph has been changed
to reflect the comments made at the 10:45 AM meeting.


-----Original Message-----
From: fostermm [mailto:fostermm@seark.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 9:30 PM
To: Davis, Dana
Subject: hello

Hello Mrs. Dana
    I know you send me a e-mail at work today but I click it off the screen where i was working and I forgot to go back after I finish and I though about it when I got home from prayer meeting.   I am at home right now and I really don't know what you was talking about on my e-mail at work but I do know Robert have not sent me a CD yet They was in Dallas this weekend at Six Flags.   Dale is in the hospital in Pine Bluff He has been up there since Thursday He had kidney problems so now he have to have dieallas/ I guest that is the way to spell it or you know what i am talking bout When I get to work in the morning that is the first thing i am going to check is my e-mail Love you Mary


Following up on Elizabeth Sager's conversation with you Corry as to terminated wholesale power contracts and related matters, and based also on EPMI's obligation to preserve assets for the bankruptcy estate, EAST Wholesale Power's scheduling of energy receipts and deliveries in Cinergy, ComEd, PJM, Entergy and NEPOOL and any other eastern markets should be halted following the close of business today, excepting those scheduling activities in NEPOOL required in order to perform the contracts in effect between EPMI and UI, NSTAR, Central Maine, and Vermont, respectively.

If explanation is requested by our upstream counterparties, please respond that we are unable to receive due to the actions of our downstream parties (e.g., they're not taking, so we are unable to take).  If explanation is requested by downstream counterparties, please respond that we are unable to supply due to the actions of our upstream parties (e.g., they're not delivering, so we're not able to deliver).  Please contact me or Elizabeth Sager if there are questions relating to this change in our scheduling activities.

Please continue to take notes/ preserve a record of your scheduling communications.


Kim,

By the time you get this reply e:mail, it is my hope that you will have
received an e:mail from Gerald Nemec forwarding you the limited response that
we were independently making to the data request (answering Question 19 of
Pan Alberta's Data Request).,  As I was out of the office all afternoon
Friday, I was unable to confirm this with Gerald, but I know that was his
plan.  Please leave me a voicemail at 713 853 7238 if there is a problem
Monday.  Thanks for your help.

Steve

	"Kim Clark" <kclark@jhenergy.com>
	05/19/2000 01:55 PM

		 To: steve.van.hooser@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Data Responses

Are you e-mailing Enron's individual responses to J&H or Brickhill for
inclusion in the package?  We have not gotten anything as yet.  As you know,
the package must go out Monday.


I have the changes in place in order to start capturing the storage balance(s) for the 2 identified PG&E points ("PG&E Storage" and "Wild Goose Storage").  The next scrape time for PG&E is 12:30 today, so we can evaluate the first run of these values shortly after that.

Through the end of the week (and even beyond), this data should be monitored closely, to make sure the calculations are correct.

Any questions/concerns, let me know.

Chris

Pipeline ID:		47
DRN's:			PGEINV, WILDGOOSEINV

Data starts with effective date 05/12/2001, cycle 7  (this value obtained from the old PG&E Operational Report, needed to 'seed' the rolling calculations)


Dawn C Kenne
12/07/2000 08:51 AM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Physical Trader "Matrix"

Attached is a list of the traders with access to trade physical products.  As
we discussed yesterday, please provide the correct tagg books for price,
basis and index corresponding to the appropriate trader.  Is there any way to
get this back by lunch?  We have a meeting set up with Tagg IT and need this
information.

Let me know if you need any further information.  Thanks again for all of
your help.

Dawn
3-9353


Hi Wilson,

We discussed asking the counterparties for opinion letters.  Could you
outline what you think we should ask for, or alternatively, just draft it?

Thanks,

Kay


We have reached resolution regarding the parking and mass transit issue.  Until notified otherwise, the parking and mass transit subsidy will continue as an employee benefit.

For those who have a payroll parking deduction, your deduction has been stopped.  No deduction should occur on 12/31/01 payroll.  In addition, you should receive a credit for the deduction taken for the 12/15 payroll.

For those who incurred any out-of-pocket parking costs during the month of December, you may expense up to $89 for reimbursement.

Beginning 1/1/02, parking and mass transit will continue as follows:

WTC Parking:  You should receive your parking pass in the mail. Payroll deductions will begin on the 1/15/02 paycheck. (No Action Req'd)

Outside Parking Lots:  Park at lot of your choice and pay out of pocket.  Request reimbursement of up to $89 per month. (No payroll parking deduction will occur)

Tri-Met and MAX employees:  Passes are available for January.  If you would like to pick up your pass, please see Debra Davidson.

NOTE:  Extra Tri-Met passes are available.  If you would like to select mass transit as your parking option, please notify either Grace or myself before Friday, 12/21/01 EOB and we will insure a monthly pass is available.

Validations:  We will no longer validate parking passes, however, you are able to reimburse up to $89 per month for daily parking.

If you have any questions, please let us know!

ENA Human Resources
Julie Kearney
503) 464-7404

Grace Rodriguez
503) 464-8321


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	 Staff Mtg. Conference room EB4102

Date:		4/2/2001
Time:		10:30 AM - 1:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


FYI---it looks like CMS and Enron are the two shortlisted companies for the
SADAF power/steam opportunity in Eastern Saudi Arabia.  You may recall taht
this opportunity could give a good base line income with upsides for energy
management services in a huge petrochemical comples in Eastern Saudi.

We will be receiving clarification questionnaires from SADAF and will meet
with them in the near future.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
12/09/2000 07:50 AM ---------------------------

	Enron International

	From:  Maurizio La Noce                           12/09/2000 07:51 AM

To: Rob Stewart/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Terence H
Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kevin
Ruffcorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: SADAF

Rob,
Intelligence from Saudi:

Sadaf - Cogeneration Plant
?
The two short listed companies  are:

Enron/Xenel industries
CMS/Al Zamil

Enelpower has been requested to keep their  bond valid until the end of
January, as Sadaf will revert to them if the  negotiations with the
shortlisted companies are not successful.
?
More detailed information will follow

Regards


Some questions in advance of the 42nd floor meeting on the 16th:

Do you expect  the current crisis in California will result in an "overbuilt" situation for the pipelines serving California, similar to 1993-94?
It seems like everyone has an expansion proposal.

Do you expect the situation in India to be resolved to our satisfaction?

What is your projection for year-end stock price?


I will be out of the office until Wednesday. January 2, 2002. Please call Kim Ward at 713-853-0685 if you need immediate assistance.


Please do not reply to this e-mail.

You are receiving this message because an invoice requiring coding, issue
resolution, or approval has been forwarded to your iBuyit Payables in-box.
This requires your action through iBuyit Payables.

To launch iBuyit Payables, click on the link below:
http://iBuyitPayables.enron.com

Note:  Log into iBuyitPayables using the same Employee PID (P-Number) and
Password you use to enter the eHRonline system and/or SAP.

First time iBuyit Payables user?  For training materials, click on the link
below:
http://sap.enron.com/sap_doclib/user/file_list.asp?cabinet_id=265

Need help?
Please contact the ISC Call Center at (713) 345-4727.


I am not on side with a contract for Per.  Please give me a call.


As we discussed, due to weather we decided to reschedule our maintenance,
and noms have been returned to 75,000 MMBtu/d effective today and following,
until further notice.  15,000 MMBtu will come from CIPCO into Mobil Beaumont,
50,000 into PG & E, and 7,000 from Fuels Cotton Valley into HPL.

Unless a problem arises, we plan to stay at this level until Tuesday,
3/21/2000,
when we will go down some for 1 day only.


Due to the nature of this deal, I've prepared an LOI with an exclusivity
period.  Let me know what you think,

Kay


Sara and I have gone through this Confirmation with a fine tooth comb and
have just completed putting in the finishing touches. See attached, and good
luck !!!


Dear ClickAtHome Participant,

ClickAtHome is interested in making sure you have the latest security tools available to you.  As part of the ClickAtHome program, you may download and update Norton Anti-Virus and BlackICE Defender software from the ClickAtHome Portal.

Norton AntiVirus software repairs computer virus infections automatically.  It scans and cleans your hard drive, diskettes and both incoming and outgoing email.
BlackICE Defender is an industrial-strength anti-hacker system that protects your PC by scanning your DSL, cable modem, or dial-up Internet connection looking for hacker activity. When it detects an attempted intrusion, it automatically blocks traffic from that source, keeping intruders from accessing your system.
By installing and updating both Norton AntiVirus and BlackICE Defender, your ClickAtHome PC will have the latest security offered by these two products.
Instructions for accessing the Portal and downloading the software are provided below.
If you have any questions or wish to provide feedback, please email clickathome@enron.com.  Thank you for your participation in ClickAtHome.
The ClickAtHome Team!
__________________________________
To download the software:
1)  Visit the ClickAtHome Portal at www.clickathome.net from your ClickAtHome PC.
2)  Logon to the Portal with your personally created Portal User ID and Password, or create a new account if you have not created a user ID and password by selecting "Create a NEW Account" at the top left corner.  The Portal User IDs and Passwords are created by you.  The Enron Help Desk is not able to assist with Portal support, but if you need any assistance, please send an email to "clickathome@enron.com".
3) Once you have logged on, select "Tools" from the top menu bar.
4) Under the "Secure Download" heading, click on "BlackICE" or "Norton" and log on to the download page using your SAP ID and Date of Birth.
5) Follow the directions provided on screen.


Yes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Redmond, Brian
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:04 PM
To:	Farmer, Daren J.; Fitzwater, Loftus
Cc:	Salinas, Michael
Subject:	FW: WAHA Hub Co.

Are you guys able to attend?

Regards,
Brian

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herber, Stephen
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:47 PM
To:	Redmond, Brian; Miller, Kent; Watson, Kimberly; Williams, Jo; Mercaldo, Vernon; Stage, Michael G.
Cc:	Wehring, Linda; Robertson, Audrey
Subject:	WAHA Hub Co.

A meeting has been scheduled for 3:30 p.m. on Wednesday, November 14 in ECN 1336. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss ENA's desire to create a WAHA Header using facilities owned by Northern and/or Transwestern. We will tie Jo in via conference call. See you tomorrow.
Thanks,
Steve


FYI
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scurlock, Debra
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 5:47 PM
To:	Buchanan, John
Subject:	E-mail  Addresses

   I  wanted to give you the results of the request  that you gave me on Friday.
   This is the info I was able to gather.  Several of them had already left for the day.

   Becky  Wells                                       Boss or supervisor:
   E-Prime                                               Linda Richards
   becky.wells@eprime.com                      Linda.Richards@eprime.com

   C.J. Barrera                                          Susan Griffin
   Conoco                                                 Susan.L.Griffin@usa.conoco.com
   c.j.barrera@usa.conoco.com
                                                               C.J. informed me that his supervisor did not want to receive
                                                               any extra e-mails, so he would not give me the address.
                                                                He said that only the two designated schedulers should receive
                                                                the e-mails.

  Leo Rice                                                Boss or supervisor:
  BP Amoco                                             Pat Clynes
                                                               CCLYNESP@BP.com

  Matt Chance                                          Boss of supervisor:
  Dynegy                                                  Mayda  Mendoza
  matc@dynegy.com                                 MZME@Dynegy.com

 I would be glad to work on this more on Monday.


Please note that the time of the Friday afternoon staff meeting has been
changed for this week only.  Please mark the following on your calendar:

  Date:    Friday, August 11, 2000

  Time:    3:30 pm - 5:30 pm

  Location:   EB 30C1

  Topic:   Combined Staff and Budget Meeting

If you have any questions/conflicts, please feel free to call Kay (30643) or
me.

Thanks!

Beverly
57857


Hi Harlan

Hope your enjoying your fortuitous timing - since you've been gone we haven't
seen below triple digits and there is no relief in site.  In that vain, I'd
love nothing more than to pull you back for nothing less than an Into
meeting.  I spoke w Kevin Presto, head of East trading, and he has proposed
that we all get together no earlier than the end of next week, with
afternoons and Tues or Thurs being the best days.  He would propose that he,
Rogers Herndon and John Zufferli attend.  Let me know what days would work
for you.

Happy trails
Elizabeth
713 853 6349


We have developed a matrix and are populating it. I should have something to you soon.

Gloria

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:26 AM
To:	Ogenyi, Gloria; Kingerski, Harry
Subject:	FW: State Licensing/Utility Agreements

Gloria --

Where are we on a matrix of Utility agreements?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fite, Rebecca
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:15 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Hughes, Evan; Woodward, Jason; Kingerski, Harry; Ogenyi, Gloria; Shields, Craig; Wood, James M.
Subject:	State Licensing/Utility Agreements

Gloria, Jim and Harry;

Thanks for pulling us all together on Monday. We look forward to working with your group on merging the State Licensing and Utility Agreements into a common area, in order to keep the organization informed and up to date.

I wanted to re-cap just a bit.  The Services Group has state licensing responsibility for Gas and Power for EESI and EEMC. We handle new licensing and renewals.  We are on an "auto-reminder" distribution from EES legal, Heather Mathis for renewals/reporting.  We physically house all documentation relating to licensing on our floor. We currently publish and distribute as needed State License status report which identifies where we are licensed and what our license # is.  The Services Group works directly with Gloria for utility agreements, as we are one of many groups who she obtains sign-off from and/or information in order to execute agreements and State Licensing information is critical to her processes.

Gloria and I met yesterday to discuss next steps.  We are working together to provide the following.

1) Matrix of Executed Agreements which includes: State, License #, UDC, Agreement Type, Signatory, Date Issued, Expiration/Renewal, Security Requirements. (2 Weeks)
2) Backfill each groups need for documentation - provide copies of State Licenses and/or UDC agreements. (2 Weeks)
3) Identify the EES/ENE contacts sent to the State/UDC, update as needed, internally and externally. (2 - 3 Weeks)
4) Provide Summary information regarding State/UDC that can be placed on EES Market Central (2-3 Weeks?)
5) Ensure information is updated, published, organized and accessible to all interested parties. - Gloria has initiated creating binders that will be housed on the 47th floor - we will encompass State information with the executed UDC agreements.

Gloria, please feel free to add anything I have overlooked.  I've attached the contact list currently used when obtaining State Licenses. This should help identify other stakeholders who you may want to speak with.

 << File: List of Contacts.doc >>

Regards,
Rebecca


Please send me a few recommended B&Bs and restaurants.  Thanks for your help.

Kevin

My email at home is kruscitti@aol.com (I think).


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/11/2000 01:17 PM -----

	"IssueAlert" <IssueAlert@scientech.com>
	10/11/2000 06:30 AM

		 To:
		 cc:
		 Subject: Online Niche Players Capitalize on Natural-Gas Shortage, Bypass
Utilities

http://www.consultrci.com

************************************************************************

SCIENTECH's E-commerce InfoGrid uncovers the efforts of energy-related
companies in the ever-growing field of electronic commerce. A sample can
be viewed at:
 http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/InfoGrid
************************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, October 11, 2000
Online Niche Players Capitalize on Natural-Gas Shortage, Bypass Utilities
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

SmartEnergy, a Con Edison competitor, is offering New York and Westchester
consumers price protection with the ability to lock-in today's natural-gas
rates for a period of one year. In a separate announcement, myHomeKey.com
announced that it will offer energy savings packages designed to reduce
energy consumption and lower rates for customers in the face of rising
energy costs.

ANALYSIS: As reports continue to accumulate that a natural-gas shortage
will send prices skyrocketing this winter (see my IssueAlert from Oct.
9 on the subject), the most common response from electric utilities has
been to warn their customers that they will see higher rates over the next
few months. I can point to several examples. Minneapolis-based Xcel Energy
announced a few weeks back that its natural-gas customers could face heating
bills that are 35 to 50 percent higher than their bills last winter. Dominion
East Ohio has warned its residential customers that they can expect to
pay about $70 more per month for natural gas from November through January.
And the warnings are coming not only in the Midwest and Northeast*where
low winter temperatures drive up energy bills every year*but in the West
as well. In California, PG&E warns that its customers can expect to see
their winter bills increase by about $25, to an average bill of $75 (compared
to $50 last winter). These are just a few examples of utility companies
across the United States playing damage control, trying to minimize the
customer outrage when customers suddenly see their bills double or triple.

Along with their warnings, these utilities give reasons*perhaps seen as
excuses by the public*for the rising cost of energy. There is a shortage
of natural gas across the country, brought about by a drop-off in production.
It was an unusually hot summer, which depleted supplies for energy. Demand
in general has grown to surprising levels.

Meanwhile, start-up online companies that many of us have not even heard
of are using the rise in natural-gas prices as a golden marketing
opportunity,
and attempting to take business away from traditional utility companies.
SmartEnergy is a perfect example. In existence just since April 1999,
SmartEnergy offers electricity and natural gas to residential and small
business customers. According to EnergyGuide.com, for an average home in
New York City, SmartEnergy's natural-gas rates typically have run about
$189 per month, compared Con Edison's $140. Under its new promotion,
SmartEnergy's
plan for natural gas guarantees that New York City and Westchester gas
customers who sign on with their service now will be locked into current
natural-gas rates for the next 12 months. This promotion comes at an ideal
time for those who opt to switch, as natural-gas prices should begin their
projected sharp increase over the next few weeks. Based on recent forecasts,
SmartEnergy is claiming that Con Edison customers who make the switch can
expect to save up to 40 percent on their energy through the winter months.
The start-up company also is offering 500 United Airlines Mileage Plus
Reward Miles credit and $25 sign-up bonus to entice customers away from
Con Edison.

Based on the available information about SmartEnergy, it is unclear how
the online provider will be able to guarantee the 40-percent reduction
in natural-gas rates. I would presume that SmartEnergy has entered into
some hedging strategies to minimize its risk in the event that natural-gas
prices remain high into the next year. Any prudent provider would have
a hedging strategy to protect itself, and locking itself into 12-month
contracts without its own contracts for obtaining natural gas at spot market
prices would certainly raise questions about the future of SmartEnergy.
In addition, SmartEnergy will have difficulty in recruiting customers away
from Con Edison and other utility providers. Many customers still have
reservations about signing on with an online company that they do not know.
There will be some customers who jump at the chance to lock in current
rates for 12 months, but many others will stick with the company that they
know even if their rates increase.

I did a quick search around Con Edison's Website to see if it might be
offering an alternative offer to retain its customers, but could find nothing
that the utility is doing to specifically address the projected increase
in natural-gas prices this winter. Con Edison does offer a level billing
program in which customers receive a consistent bill amount each month,
alleviating fluctuation in their bills. Yet, as a utility company, Con
Edison has a standard offer of service that regulators closely monitor.
It is possible that Con Edison could request changes to the standard offer
service, which would likely need to be approved by the New York Public
Service Commission. The PSC could agree, or determine that the competitive
offers by providers such as Smart Energy are a positive result of
deregulation.
In addition, Con Edison could be hampered by fuel contracts that may not
allow it much flexibility with regard to lowering its rates. Overall, Con
Edison probably does not have a lot of flexibility regarding the rates
it can charge customers, thereby making this offer from SmartEnergy difficult
to beat.

The other online start-up taking advantage of natural-gas prices is
myHomeKey.com,
which made a recent promise to reduce home heating, oil, natural-gas, and
electricity rates. The marketing route that this online start-up is taking
is energy efficiency*teaching households how to more effectively use their
energy and, hopefully, save money as a result. Energy is not the only service
of the myHomeKey.com; it is also involved in home maintenance and repair,
appliances, home monitoring and moving services. Yet, I learned that
myHomeKey.com
just recently launched co-branded sites with KeySpan Corp. and TXU Energy
Services to "provide millions of local customers" with the ability to check
energy efficiency in their homes.

What's important to note about these two developments is the advantage
that online energy providers have over traditional utilities. As utilities
try to disengage themselves from regulatory-bound rate structures, online
companies have the freedom and flexibility to offer attractive products
and billing options to customers in deregulated states. There are the online
providers that we know about, such as Utility.com and Essential.com.
Utility.com
has not yet started to sell natural gas, although it has established a
partnership with Sempra Energy in which Sempra Energy Trading will sell
natural gas in deregulated markets via the Utility.com Web site. Utility.com
plans to start selling natural gas by the end of this year, but it has
not developed any marketing campaign in this regard. Essential.com continues
to open up its service across the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast regions. Yet,
on a weekly basis, new start-up online energy providers surface, eager
to grab their own share of the retail market.

I also wonder where The New Power Company is in all of this rush to
capitalize
on the marketing opportunities surrounding the rise in natural-gas prices.
It would seem like a natural for TNPC to make a big splash with its own
marketing efforts, as it already promises lower prices for both natural
gas and electricity. In any event, as the natural-gas shortage may become
a public relations nightmare for utility companies across the country,
it conversely could work to the advantage of the more agile online providers
==============================================================
Read about SCIENTECH's new PowerHitter interview with Jeff Sterba, Chairman

and CEO of the Public Service Company of New Mexico at:
http://www.consultrci.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products including e-commerce and telecom in the electric utility
industry. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our free, daily
IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their full name and
email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective
regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and in the body of the email type "remove."


Hey,

I just wanted to let you know there were three people who were responsible
for the changes that Virginia was forced to make for Feb, and you were one of
them.  As you can see below, the errors included counterparty changes, volume
changes, deal extensions and even adding missing deals all together.  I'm
forwarding you this as a STRONG reminder to make sure you have entered
everything carefully and accurately.  As a group we need to ensure every deal
is done right from start to finish.  Virginia is getting tired of fixing our
sloppy mistakes and I am getting tired of hearing about them!

Thanks,
Jesse
---------------------- Forwarded by Jesse Bryson/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2001 04:22
PM ---------------------------

Virginia Thompson
03/15/2001 09:32 AM
To: Jesse Bryson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: FYI: DMS changes to Inc sheets

Dear Jesse,

I wanted to affirm with you that I am going to be making the following
changes to Real-Time's Inc and Services sheets and to EnPower:

TRADING

 2-12-01   Adding deal # 541704 to capture purchase from PPL Montana  HE 13
12MW @ $360.00   (Total DPR Impact:  -$4320.00)
 2-14-01  Changed HE 16 30 MW to 35 MW purchased
 2-14-01  Changed HE 19 45 MW to 55 MW purchased

SERVICES

1-18-01  Making counterparty change from Puget to WWP for HE 23 (35MW @
$325), deal # 500585  (No DPR Impact)
1-19-01  Making counterparty change from Puget to WWP for HE 1-2 (60 MW and
50 MW @ $275)  deal # 500660 (No DPR Impact)
1-20-01  Making counterparty change from Powerex to WWP for HE 10 (10 MW @
$325)  deal # 501531(No DPR Impact)
2-18-01  Adding deal # 551179 & 551187 to capture purchase from MPC and sale
to Powerex HE 6 30 MW @ $259 and HE 7 60 MW @ $268
2-24-01  Extending in EnPower and adding line to services sheet purchase from
MPC, sale to Powerex HE 18 15MW @ $189

There are more to come; I will keep you updated.
Please let me know if this is not OK.

Thanks,

Virginia


Stephanie and Tana:

I have a revision to the profile for Black Hills Corp. -- read-only access
for West power products (set them up to trade East power now) pending
negotiation of master agreement.

Leslie
----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000 03:46 PM -----

	Shari Stack
	08/21/2000 03:30 PM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Black Hills

Leslie

Spoke with Tim Belden and Mark Fischer from Portland. They said to give Black
Hills "read-only" access until the EEI is signed. The client is OK with this..

Shari

	Leslie Hansen
	08/21/2000 02:22 PM

		 To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Black Hills

Shari:

I understand from Rhonda that you are working on a Black Hills EEI Master.
This CP has applied for an EOL password, so this moves this up a notch in
terms of current priority.

Thanks,

Leslie


I need to pull my tapes for Jan 21st.  Would you take care of that please?


The Ministry of Environment in Ontario released its final emissions trading regulation yesterday.   Based on a quick review, several changes were made that Enron asked for in its submission earlier this month.

Specifically:

OPG's allocations will be partitioned through 2007 (not 2010)
Allowances will be allocated on a prospective basis, baned on the previous year's generation (output).  Estimations of energy production will be used (subject to a true-up) to accommodate new generators which come on line during a compliance year.
Direction and distance provisions that would discount emissions reductions credits (foreign allowances) have been removed.
The SO2 set aside for renewable energy and energy efficiency is raised to 4 KT (NOx --expressed as NO - remains at 1 KT).

There is no restriction on banking of credits.
ERC credit lifetime extended from five to seven years.
Approval of ERCs by the Ministry of the Environment before registration of the credits (rather than after registration but before use).

Please see the summary of the regulation below compiled by Lisa DeMarco of Donahue Ernst & Young in Toronto.  Environmental Strategies will analyze the regulation and be back in touch with more information on its impact for Enron.  Do not hesitate to contact me with any questions.

Link to MOE summary of regulation changes and links to regulation:

<http://204.40.253.254/envregistry/016576er.htm>
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
On October 24, 2001, the Ontario Minister of Environment released the final emissions trading regulation which includes several significant changes to the draft regulation. The release of this regulation and an additional regulation governing emissions from the Lakeview generating station is broadly thought to signify the likely opening of the Ontario electricity market in Spring, 2002 (please see attached article).

A brief overview of the central aspects of the Ontario emissions trading regulation, which sets out a hybrid ("Cap, Credit and Trade") system of emissions trading for Ontario, follows

Applicability:

Starting in 2002, the regulation will apply to Ontario Power Generation's ("OPG") 6 fossil fuel generating stations.  In 2004, the requirements will be extended to large (>25MW) Independent Power Producers ("IPPs") in the province.  Most notably, the regulation is accompanied by an announcement that caps and the associated hybrid trading scheme will be extended to other major industrial sectors in the near future.  Consultation with those sectors regarding the level of their sector caps will commence immediately.

Caps:

NOx (measured as NO):

An overall cap of 36 KT in 2002 will decline to 28 KT in 2010.  The cap will be partitioned between OPG and IPPs  between 2004 and 2007.  Each year renewable and energy conservation projects will be eligible for 1 KT of "set-aside" allowances.  Starting in 2007, the allocation of allowances will also be subject to a North/South partition to comply with obligations under the Ozone Annex to the Canada / US A Air Quality Agreement.  Trading between these areas is not, however, restricted.

SO2:

An overall cap of 157.5 KT in 2002 will decline to 131 KT in 2007.  The cap will not be partitioned between OPG and IPPs and will apply to OPG facilities in 2002 and all large IPPs in 2004.  Each year renewable and energy conservation projects will be eligible for 4 KT of "set-aside" allowances.

Allocation:

Prospective allocation of allowances will be on the basis of a facility's pro-rata share of energy production (output) in the province.  OPG will receive a corporate based allocation each year until the end of 2007, at which point all allocations will be on a facility basis.  The proposed mechanism allows for estimations of energy production to be used (subject to a true-up) to accommodate new generators which come on line during a compliance year.  Measurement of emissions must be by CEMs or equivalent technology.

Credit Creation:

Emission reduction credits ("credits") may be created in accordance with MOE "Standard Methods" from baseline project emission rates in the year prior to creation.  Specific requirements are set out in the Ontario Emissions Trading Code ("OETC").  Generally credits may be created from any of the following jurisdictions:

Ontario, New York, Pennsylvania, New jersey, Delaware, Maryland, West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia (with possible science-based extension of the eligible jurisdictions)

In addition, US allowances which are issued by these jurisdictions may be acceptable for use as Ontario credits if they meet the requirements set out in the OETC.

Early action credits may be eligible for use if they:  meet the requirements of the OETC; were submitted for review by the PERT program before July 1, 2001;  and were created between July 1, 1998 and January 1, 2000.

Credits will be approved for use by the MOE before they are registered on the Emissions Trading Registry.

Credit and Allowance Use:

Use of credits is limited to 33% of allowances used for NOx and 10% of allowances used for SO2.  These limits do not apply if the facility is operating under an IMO must run contract.

All credits will be subject to a 10% environmental discount.  The ratio of smog season to non-smog season NOx credits must reflect the same ratio of actual emissions.

There is no restriction on banking of credits.  There is no distance and directionality discounting for the eligible jurisdictions.
Trading

There is generally unrestricted trading through the Ontario Emissions Trading Registry.


A New Energy Ventures Company


I have forwarded your email on to Mary Cook, she is actually the attorney
working on the transaction.  I am a paralegal.  Her direct number is
713/3457732.

	Cossette.Helene@hydro.qc.ca
	09/22/2000 03:26 PM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Hydro Quebec

Hi Tana,

I know that you are expecting to get back to me next Wednesday but our
traders faced credit issues with Enron today and they asked me to push
forward the process of getting all agreements in place as soon as. Thus, I
am sending you a draft of a restated and amended guaranty agreement hoping
that this will help to speed up the process. I will call you on Monday.

 <<HQ@epmi_$30M.doc>>

 H,lSne Cossette
 ConseillSre Contrats Commerciaux
 *  (514) 289-6720
 *  514) 289-6722
 *  cossette.helene@hydro.qc.ca
 * A
 75 Ren, L,vesque Boulevard West, 18th floor
 Montr,al, Qu,bec, H2Z 1A4

 - HQ@epmi_$30M.doc


Enron Federal Credit Union Stands Ready to Assist You
Enron Federal Credit Union would like you to know that we stand ready to assist our members affected by the recent events. We are committed to those who may need special assistance during this difficult time.
The State of Enron Federal Credit Union
We are dedicated to providing our members with all the services they would normally expect to receive.  Business will continue to be conducted as it always has.  We will continue to provide loans.  In the event you have an EFCU loan or credit card, we will negotiate a workable agreement for its repayment if necessary.  These arrangements will be made on an individual basis.  ATM withdrawals and Debit Card transactions will carry the same daily limits.
EFCU will be conducting "business as usual."
EFCU is a not-for-profit financial institution (a cooperative) owned and operated by you, the member.  And, although we are here exclusively to provide financial services to the employees of Enron Corp. and their family members, we remain financially independent from Enron Corp.  And, your accounts at the Credit Union are insured to $100,000.00 by the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF), supervised by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), an agency of the U.S. Government.

How To Access The Credit Union

You may continue to access your funds in the Credit Union at EB 399, through our electronic services, or at any of our Texas Credit Union Service Center branches:

Northwest Houston				Galleria Area
5507 E FM 1960 West				5444 Westheimer (CMS Energy Building)
281.580.1557					713.627.4000
Southeast Houston				Sugar Land
12346B Gulf Freeway				15303 Southwest Freeway
713.946.5828					281.242.3200

QuickLink - http://www.enronfcu.com
QuickTeller - 713.853.1466 or 800.321.1396
Anytime Loans - 800.235.8763 or http://www.enronfcu.com

Teller Services Hours
Monday, Tuesday, Thursday & Friday:  7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Wednesday:  9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Financial Services Hours
Monday - Friday:  9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.

Attached is a list of Frequently Asked Questions about the state of Enron Federal Credit Union.  Please contact us with any questions or concerns you may have at 713.853.6242, or at efcu@enron.com.


Danny, be aware that I just got the NNG info and the 12/28/01 Summary has been changed just now so anything you looked at prior to 3:15 today is obsolete.


Here is the final version.  I'll bring copies with me tomorrow to Sacramento
and can drop them off at Hedy's office.  I meet with Kari Dohn at 10 AM and
will be attending the AB 1890 Implementation Group meeting at 1:30.  I can
drop off copies before I head out for the Dohn meeting.  If there's anything
else, just let me know.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


9/10 - Julie, on the 12th, Steve will be on vacation and on the 18th, Steve will be in Albuquerque and then to San Diego for our customer meeting.
9/10 - Steve & team to meet with Danny on 9/17 @ 1:30
9/11 - Should Eric attend, ask Danny


Start Date: 12/15/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121520.txt


Charlene, I'm sending down the letter Benjamin sent to Jeff with some ideas
about improving morale in the program, which was referenced in the e-mail I
bcc'd you on a moment ago.  SRS


that is b/c that pussy knows he wont play


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

OPEC Basket of Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/opec50.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Bill - I'm not sure if you were aware 750310 and 750307 are EOL deals under West Bom.

Kysa M. Alport
Enron North America
(O) 503-464-7486
(C) 503-706-5308


Attached is a memo from Beth Tilney regarding the new P&D (Participation and
Dissent) program, as proposed by the Vision and Values Task Force.

Please take a minute to consider issues within your groups that might be
appropriate for a P&D pilot.  We would like to host several pilots within ENA
in the next week or so if at all possible and need your help in doing so.

I would be happy to provide more details or answer questions about the P&D
process.  Please don't hesitate to contact me.  My extension is 3-9964.

Thank you,
Elisabeth McCabe


Marcus and Ed can we talk today about this.  Is there a good time?

I need to get back with NEPOOL today.  Also, while our business dropped off, I am guessing that NE-ISO has been arranging energy for our UI load and our payable is growing pretty quickly.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:50 AM
To: Steffes, James D.
Subject: FW: Notice of Financial Assurance Default
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential

-----Original Message-----
From: Nettelton, Marcus
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:22 AM
To: Sacks, Edward
Cc: Bradford, William S.; Sager, Elizabeth; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject: RE: Notice of Financial Assurance Default
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential

Ed

As a first step, please could you check the position as to the bonds we have posted and provide me with details as to the volume of trades we have entered into since December 2 this year and for the same period last year. In addition please could you confirm what our NEPOOL Charges have been for the last 12 months.

My initial reaction is that, provided the bond holders have not sought to withdraw the bonds and confirm that to us, then ISO-NE's position is considerably weakened. The fact that they only allege "purported notice" gives me something to work with, in that it is either notice or it is not.

The amount that they are seeking does appear to be on the high side, especially having regard to what I am assuming is  reduced activity by certainly EPMI, in NEPOOL since December 2.

I will review the NEPOOL Financial Assurance Policy to ensure that there is nothing we have missed and subject to the data and information in respect of the bonds posted by us and the activity data I would seek to challenge this as a valid notice and state that we are still in compliance with the Financial Assurance Policy.

Regards,

Marcus

-----Original Message-----
From: Sacks, Edward
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 6:45 AM
To: Nettelton, Marcus; Nicolay, Christi L.
Cc: Bradford, William S.; Sager, Elizabeth
Subject: FW: Notice of Financial Assurance Default

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, Cheryl [mailto:carnold@iso-ne.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 6:24 PM
To: Sacks, Edward; Steffes, James D.
Cc: McKenna, Edward
Subject: Notice of Financial Assurance Default

Please see attached notice of Financial Assurance Default.

 <<Enron Financial Assur Default 12_11_01.doc>>


LuckySurf.com, the FREE game that plays just like the Lottery,
has sent out Instant Winner Emails just like this one. And, this Email
could be a $1,000 Instant Cash Winner

Just click below, pick 7 numbers, register, then click a banner. You'll
find out if you've won $1,000 Cash Instantly! All in about a minute.
Plus, you'll automatically entered in the daily $1-Million Jackpot Drawing.
That's it. No Catch. No Clause

Thanks and Good Luck !
The LuckySurf.com Team

http://www.luckysurf.com/play?promo=plaenrn011002us01

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://i.pm0.net/remove?freebiecash:14
* Enter your email address (don.baughman@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "freebiecash:14".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address don.baughman@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: don.baughman@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>

pmguid:39.1d4b.9h08x


Tetco held a 637 "settlement" conference last Fiday to discuss their latest
proposal dated March 8th.  Their new proposal involved the institution of a
weekly cash-out mechanism along with a daily variance penalty based on
overall system position.

In brief:
PENALTIES
Stage One--on any day where a shipper's imbalance in greater than 7% in any
zone, the "daily imbalance charge" would be 2x the maximum PAL rate for the
entire balance (not just the piece that's over 7%) in each zone.
Stage Two--on any day where either the Market Area or Access Area is out of
balance by greater than 4%, Tetco would have the discretion to issue a Stage
Two notice, establishing a tolerance level (which could be 0, subject to
Tetco's sole discretion) that all shippers would have not less than 12 hours'
notice with which to comply.  Under Tetco's propsal, any volumes in excess of
the level stated in the notice would be assessed a "daily imbalnce charge"
equal to 4x the maximum PAL rate.
In a Stage 2 situation, if your imbalance is in the opposite direction of the
pipe, no penalty would be charged (but you'd still cash-out)

CASH-OUT
Weekly monetization of cash-out positions based on a Sunday to Saturday week
(Tetco needs to revise this so that the weeks are managed depending on how
the calendar falls so that they minimize problems like a 2-day week).
Monetization by Zone in 2 tiers
 0-4% to be cashed-out at the average of each day's mid point price for the
weekly period
 4%+ ENTIRE IMBALANCE cashed-out at the weekly highest/lowest common price
for the week
This is a significant change since under the current tariff, shippers pay a
staggered fee, such that volumes with in the first tier are charged that
tier's price, then overflow into the next tier is charged at that tier's
price, etc.  Now, the entire amount would be assessed the higher price.

NETTING & TRADING
would be limited to the week in which the imbalance was incurred and would be
limited by zone (contrary to Order 637)
Any netting or trading would not decrease the daily imbalance charge (the
positions would be frozen each day) but could decrease the cash-out exposure
(completely contrary to 637 which indicates that netting & trading should be
a tool used to limit penalties)

Results:
it would be possible, in fact likely, that a shipper would pay both an
imbalance penalty and a cash-out fee on the same volume (contrary to Order
637)
under the Zero tolerance Stage Two scenario, Tetco would have complete
discretion to set the level (not itself a bad thing, they need to be able to
control their system)--they've indicated that they'd set a 2% floor for
penalties but that doesn't really solve the problem.
not only would the cash-out mechanism be more difficult to administer, it
could significantly increase our cash-out liability and subject us to
penalties that do not exist today.

Dynegy, PGC and Indicated Shippers indicated to Tetco that we don't see any
progress towards settlement, or even a foundation to go forward on and that
we're ready at this point to go to the Commission for a decision on their 637
filing as a whole.  Several of the LDC's stated that they want to continue to
pursue settlement so we agreed to submit a status report to Staff indicating
that we'll continue to talk, setting an April 30th deadline.  At that point,
I expected that Tetco would attempt to establish an aggressive negotiation
schedule in an effort to make some progress--instead all they did was agree
to my request to provide a comparison of the different offers and scheduled a
follow up meeting for April 10th.

Tetco indicated that they don't plan to make another offer and would not
agree to entertain counter-offers.  At this point, I doubt that we'll make
any significant progress and believe that this issue will end up being
litigated, or at least submitted to  the FERC for a decision.  Based strictly
on the letter of the Order (or at least our interpretation of it), I think we
have

Please let me know if you have any questions / concerns / comments.

Thanks,
Suzanne
x54880


Here is the final list for Christmas Baskets for this year
with the exception of Stinson Gibner and Vasant Shanbhogue.

 Any comments or questions please call x34710.

                                             Thanks
                                         Kevin Moore

We still have plenty of time......
 Deadline Date : December 12,2000


Frank,
I am interested in speaking with you further concerning investment opportunities.     Although you mentioned that  the $1,800  (the amount in my account) is a small sum,  I have been reluctant to invest more money with your firm,   given to performance of the suggestions provided previously.
I have been a market maker in the electricity business and I realize that no one is right all of the time;    I dont expect this.      However,   I do expect some consistent contact from a broker  who has been successful in his own trading, not just success in brokering trades.      My view will be that the more success we have,  the more money I will be willing to invest.

I am interested in discussing my specific financial situation with you  and learning more about you, your track record and your abilities.
I do wish to talk about covered calls on specific options that I have expiring in January.    I would also like to discuss any other profitable ideas that fit my profile.

I will not use your suggestions to trade at  discount brokerage or otherwise abuse our potential relationship.

I look forward to hearing from you.

John M Forney
713-853-7160


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/02/2001
02:42 PM ---------------------------

Rosalee Fleming on 04/02/2001 10:52:12 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Advisory council meeting

Steve, we have not heard from him.  Vanessa followed up Stelzer's call with
the letter.

From: Steven J Kean on 04/02/2001 09:46 AM
To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Advisory council meeting

See last question.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/02/2001 09:46 AM -----

	Stelzer@aol.com
	04/02/2001 08:47 AM

		 To: klay@enron.com
		 cc: skean@enron.com
		 Subject: Advisory council meeting

    Let me review where we stand for the April 10-11 meeting.
1.  I have spoken with Gavyn and asked him to add to his usual review
comments on the significance of recent developments for Enron.
2.  I have asked Bill Kristol to do the same.
3.  I have asked Paul Portney to review "the lay of the land" in the
environmental policy area.
4.  Since we couldn't locate a speaker to address the question of how Enron,
now larger and more corporate than in the past, can continue to attract the
best, the brightest (and the oddest?), I have asked Pankaj to give a brief
talk about what the literature generated by his colleagues has to tell us on
this subject.
5.  I couldn't get anyone on the "monopoly-too-big-and-powerful" question,
although I am still trying.
I assume you folks will brief us on California and the national energy supply
picture. Have we heard from the author of "When Genius Fails"?


See you--have fun at your parties!


Tom:
Please see the attached round 2 bidding instructions.  Thanks!
Ben


Dave

Are you unwinding it?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Deffner, Joseph
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:08 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Duran, W. David; Colwell, Wes
Subject:	ECP/Linden Swaps

Here's my understanding of what has happened with the interest rate swaps:

As I indicated earlier, the original $32mm was put on for the Linden 6 expansion which never occurred.
The second swap of $350mm was put on to protect the value of the cash flow from El Paso assuming we would monetize the asset shortly. This hedge does appear to have been set with the El Paso payment stream in mind.
The original $32mm of swaps DID NOT provide a clean hedge to the remaining El Paso cash flows as they were 10 year bullets while the El Paso payment stream is a 7 year monthly amortizer.
However, the $382mm of hedges did approximate notionally the asset to be hedged.

It appears that given the assumption the swaps were to have been monetized in a short period of time, a decision may have been made that unwinding and rewinding the "dirty" interest rate hedge was more expensive than wearing the basis risk for a brief time.
Given that the monetization never occurred, it does appear to me that the $32mm hedge is ineffective and should be removed or replaced if we determine that we should hedge the rate risk associated with the note.

Anyone have anything additional to add? That's the best I could turn up looking back after the fact given the many personnel departures.


Please familiarize yourself with GE's Mail retention Policy.  It is
substantially different from what we are used to.

--D

GE's Mail Retention Policy

E-mail is a tremendous productivity tool, but its volume and use carry with
it a number of issues. Keeping up with the volume of e-mail is burdensome,
indeed often stressful. The unnecessary retention of e-mail uses valuable IT
resources, and the volume of unnecessary e-mail slows down our ability to
process and find the materials we really need. Importantly, recent court
cases illustrate how e-mails, which are so useful because of their
informality and speed, can become the subject of intense scrutiny over
meanings the authors may never have intended. Words and phrases intended to
be ironic, sarcastic or amusing can be taken out of context with
embarrassing - and unintentionally harmful - consequences.
  (1) Proper document retention is one important way to
control these burdens and risks. Our company policy has been to discard
unneeded e-mail after 30 days. To implement this policy, we are, beginning
September 1, 1999, instituting automatic deletion of e-mail in primary
e-mail folders (Inbox, Outbox, Sent Items, Drafts) company-wide after 30
days. In addition, e-mails stored in other folders will be deleted after 365
days. Finally, you should save e-mails on your local hard-drive only where
it is essential (the auto-delete will not operate on the local hard drive).
  These automatic deletion procedures will be subject to legal
limits on document destruction, limits that apply to e-mails. When an
employee's e-mail is potentially relevant to litigation or threatened
litigation, counsel for your business will cause the automatic suspend
feature to be disabled for an appropriate time period. A second limitation
involves retention of certain records required by law in such areas as tax,
EHS, government contracts. Such limitations will be implemented on a
business-by-business basis and in corporate components.
  Accordingly, for employees in the businesses, your General
Counsel and Messaging Leader will be in touch with you about implementation
of the auto delete feature in the next week or so. For corporate employees,
Brackett Denniston and David Etue will provide further guidance shortly.
  (2) But proper document retention practices represent only
part of the answer to minimizing the risk that e-mails will be misunderstood
or used improperly by our adversaries. The best solution, of course, is to
ensure that we compose our e-mail carefully and sensibly, just as we would
any other written communication. In that regard, we are attaching a list of
tips and best practices. Following these suggestions and practices will
improve the clarity of our communications and address their volume as well.
We believe that we can improve the use and productivity by taking the time
to write e-mail intelligently, and by retaining only those e-mails required
by law.
Thanks for your help.