You might hear of this, so I thought I better forward to you.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2000
08:53 PM ---------------------------

Mary Solmonson
06/08/2000 08:57 PM
To: Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joel Henenberg/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen Stock/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: TDS project

I guess I have several comments to make to this string of mails....so why not
add one more mail...

First off, Thomas is following up on my suggestion to check into TDS as when
we met a few weeks ago (on other issues)  I heard about TDS by name for the
first time - although I admit I was aware of work being done to replace the
Applix functionality.  You had remarked that you liked the TDS functionality
and wondered whether that was the way to go rather than continue to evolve
Enron Grid.  It is unfortunate that Bill is not more cooperative with Thomas'
request - more in the continuing saga of poor communication and information
sharing between our two teams.

Clearly there needs to be much more communication and sharing of information
as Global Rate Services for many months 'bowed' to the Sitara team's
priorities for Enron Grid - which you now say probably won't be used.   There
are many priorities in the wings to benefit the processes of Global Rate
Services that without has caused us to continue to experience a high rate of
errors - causing large impact to the P&L ($600,000 just the other day) and to
the invoicing and payment processes.

I have been proceeding under the impression Enron Grid was a shared
application.  You clearly don't share that view as below you stated it is the
responsibility of another group.  Is that why you dropped pursuit of Enron
Grid and began developing TDS?

Perhaps IT could meet deliverables if we provided them with a well
thought-out plan and set of priorities, good communication, and solid project
management.  To pursue separate solutions to try to save a struggling Sitara
project may not have been the best answer.  We have exacerbated the IT
resource problem by having three applications that overlap in functionality
(Phoenix, MKM, and TDS) - oh, and pieces of ERMS too.  If that's the right
answer, let's be sure we've discussed it before frivolously and selfishly
pursuing our own solutions.  The 'users' you cite as knowing of TDS are not
users at all - they are IT project managers.   Will you not have expectations
of Global Rate Services to provide settled pricing as an input to derived
curves ?  Will Global Rate Services responsibility end at the Phoenix door
and it's someone else's problem if the price doesn't reflect correctly in
TDS?

Finally, it was certainly the intent that MKM would be the ultimate solution
for all time series publishing in the organization-but I believe there is
question as to whether it is the better technical solution and whether the
design can fulfill the requirements. I wasn't aware that the pilot version of
MKM contained any curve generation functionality.  It would be interesting to
know how that got done, when ENA IT wasn't able to meet the basic
deliverables of the MKM pilot.  Another disturbing element in all this
regarding IT is - why IT did not raise a red flag that on the business side
there were requests for overlapping functionality and conflicting priorities
- you know, the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing.

As all have said before me, a gap analysis needs to be done and a plan
developed.  I look forward to increased communication and cooperation between
our teams.

To: Thomas Araujo/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Yannis Tzamouranis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William E Kasemervisz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Barnes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vanessa
Schulte/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joel Henenberg/NA/Enron@Enron, Larrissa
Sharma/HOU/ECT@ECT, Allan Severude/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Stock/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: TDS project

Users outside of Sitara do know of TDS!  Yannis and his group have had
discussions with Allen Severude's group regarding the TDS/Tibco
infrastructure as well as review of "current state" Enron Grid.  Myself,
Larrissa Sharma, Allan Severude, Steve Stock and Yannis have also had similar
approach discussions.

Please note that a small portion of TDS is the replacement of the curve
manager functionality that APPLIX currently provides (APPLIX is a trader
tool).  There has been much user input on how the curve manager in TDS will
be used.  Since EnronGrid/Rate Sever has not had an opportunity to handle the
real-time (publish/subscribe) updates yet, it was suggested the
infrastructure provided by TDS (i.e. Tibco) may be something to look.  Note
that TDS is mentioned because of the infrastructure.  The functionality
provided by the TDS curve manager does not encompass all the requirements
outlined in the EnronGrid documents (functionality lacking the most is
security, updating of "Published" pricing and the tie in to Rate Server -the
TDS curve manager is built on ERMS pub/curve codes because all the trade data
is TAGG).  Either way, the functionality that we have all been working
through regarding how curves get published as well as subscribed to does not
change.  Keep in mind that MKM also has curve generation functionality (to my
knowledge, no one in Houston was part of this development).

From a technical perspective, several items need to be addressed:

 Review/decision as to the technical direction of EnronGrid/Rate Server
infrastructure and publish/subscribe real time development.
 Rate Server has no front end for curve generation.  EnronGrid was modified
to provide this functionality; however EnronGrid is the responsibility of a
different group
  (logically, this needs to come together under the same group).
 Does the TDS/Tibco infrastructure make sense (current EnronGrid/Rate Server
design assumes the curves are always updated to the Rate Sever database and
then    messaged from the database (potential performance impact); whereas
Tibco infrastructure does not require a database update first)
 Does the MKM curve publish/subscribe supersede everything and provide a
"better" global technical solution (part of the London curve manager
development team will be in
   Houston next week; therefore a briefing of the MKM curve manager is
something that we are trying to get done).  Functionally, this will require a
more vigorous gap
   analysis review before a decision can be made.

I am open to additional discussions on the technical direction, but I do not
think that alot of additional functional documentation needs to be done and
timelines are not changing.

SRM (x33548)

Thomas Araujo @ ENRON

06/08/2000 10:13 AM
To: Yannis Tzamouranis/HOU/ECT@ECT, William E Kasemervisz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Judy Barnes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vanessa
Schulte/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joel Henenberg/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: TDS project

Bill,

I don't think anyone outside of Sitara knows of TDS.  If you could give
myself and other interested parties a demo of TDS; I don't have a good
understanding of the TDS project.   If the project is similar to the Enron
Grid as it is indicated in Yannis's response, the business users need to come
together and decide the system of choice.  Yannis makes good points of how to
come to a decision. I would change that the users provide the important
features, advantages, and shortcomings of each product as they see it.   I
would gather the users' needs and timeline.  After deciding, I would then
like to get IT involved to finalize a decision.  I would like to get the
discussion started fairly soon due to the impeding business needs.

The first thing I would suggest is have a demo of both products to inform all
impacted business users.  Bill, can we setup a demo for tomorrow or early
next week.

Thomas

Yannis Tzamouranis@ECT
06/08/2000 08:24 AM
To: William E Kasemervisz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Thomas Araujo/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: TDS project

Bill,

I have had presentations of both of these projects (that is not to say that I
know them well).

Since, according to Scott the choice is still open, we have to make a
concious decision as to which way we go.  In my mind, this is a decision that
has to be made by the user with my team's support.  I do not want and should
not drive this decision.  The decision should be driven by the user, based on
usage (business) requirements.  What the Phoenix group will provide is a
server that does (or soon will) satisfy your business requirements.  The
front end plug in is, I think,  a decoupled issue in a server-client
environment.

On the other hand, I think we should help you with the choice (if you so want
us).  I would actively consult with you to set up the choosing process, which
I imagine would go somewhat like this:
I would suggest that we do, again and all deciding parties together,  get
demos of each of these products.
Business should put together a bullet point list of the functionality needed
(even a timeline) and how the tool will be used so both Allan and Mike
understand your needs clearly.
I also suggest that we ask TDS and Enron Grid  to provide us with a short
document outlining the important features, advantages and shortcomings of
each product as they see it.  Released features should be separated from
future improvements; the latter should be be accompanied by a time line.
Limitations should be listed explicitly.
We take our impressions from the demos along with the writeups in a room and
make the decision.
If needed, business might have to spend the time to play with each of these
products for a short period of time.

In my mind it is important to make choices like this one that will affect
business for a long time based on enumerated and well understood facts (such
that usually get lost from a short demo).

Please let me know what you think,

Yannis

William E Kasemervisz
06/07/2000 08:37 PM
To: Thomas Araujo/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Yannis Tzamouranis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: TDS project

I'm not sure what you want to go over.  If you and Yannis would like to have
a demo of the TDS & Grid applications let me know & I'll try to set something
up with Scott also, so we can discuss GRID/TDS Curve Manager/ MKM.

Thomas Araujo @ ENRON

06/07/2000 10:13 AM
To: William E Kasemervisz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: TDS project

Bill,
Can you give me more information to the TDS you are working on like the due
dates, the scope, etc.  If you got some requirements documents or the
business plan on the project, it would be better.  I just want to get a
better picture of how Enron Grid fits in the big picture.

Thanks,
Thomas


Hi Kate,

This deal needs to be researched.  Can you help looking into its origin?

Thanks,

Carla
---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 12/06/2000 11:38
AM ---------------------------

Niclas Egmar@EES
12/04/2000 09:39 AM
To: Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 11_11 correction VIP

---------------------- Forwarded by Niclas Egmar/HOU/EES on 12/04/2000 11:39
AM ---------------------------

Niclas Egmar
12/01/2000 03:30 PM
To: Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Daniel Kang/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Wayne
Kimball/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: 11_11 correction

I talked to Phil about a trade on  11/11/00  regarding 640 MW deal number
456233.1 could you please send me  and Jennifer Johnson some more detail
about this deal.
Is this an hour a head deal?
What hours are involved?

Thanks alot

Niclas


As of Nov 30 for West Power Trading.

Number of books = 38 (gas and power)
Number of DPR's = 1
Number of people = 28 (this includes 13 in the real time group)

John
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Casey
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:13 AM
To:	Postlethwaite, John
Subject:	FW: information for the creditors committee

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Wednesday, January  16, 2002 1:49 PM
To:	Albrecht, Kristin; Mills, Scott; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.; Keiser, Kam; Evans, Casey; Vinson, Donald Wayne; Stevens, Martha; Glover, Sheila; Carrington, Clara; Horn, Cindy; Oliver, David; Sweeney, Kevin; Hall, D. Todd; Prejean, Frank; Swinney, John; Best, John; Thomas, Sheri; Moscoso, Michael E.; Hanson, Kristen J.; Mao, Shari; Miralles, Albert; Loibl, Kori; Reeves, Kathy; Gillis, Brian; Thurbin, Simon
Cc:	Thapar, Raj; Pearce, Barry; Hall, Bob M; Beck, Sally; Abel, Chris; Ayala, Susie; Trevino, Susan
Subject:	information for the creditors committee

As we discussed yesterday, here is the list of information that we need to gather to put into the booklets.  Please give us information (Chris, Keith, Susie, Susan and me) information as you get it.  The first priority is the rolls supporting the DPR information.  Also, please remember that all information needs to be reconciled to DPR information.  Please let Chris, Keith & myself know of your time frame to get us this info.  Currently, expectations are that we should have at least the rolls by the end of the week this week.

 << File: booket info needed.xls >>

Thanks

Shona Wilson
Director, Global Risk Operations
X39123


Mythology

                                                      "The Ten Commandments
of a Military Wife"

                              1.Thou shalt not write in ink in thy address
book.

                              2.Thou shalt not covet choice assignments of
other uniformed braches of service.

                              3.Love thy neighbor.

                              4. Honor thy Commissary and Exchange as long as
they both shall live.

                              5.Thou shalt not ridicule a local politician,
for mighty senators from local politicians grow.

                              6.Thou shall look for the best in every
assignment, even though the best may be. "The most childhood
                              diseases in one year," or "Record snow in one
months time."

                              7. Thou shall remember all thy friends from all
thy assignments, with greeting cards at Christmas, for
                              thou never knowest when thou may wish to
spendeth a night with them while enroute to a new post/base.

                              8.Be kind and gentle to retired, white-haired
Exchange and Commissary customers, because thou too will
                              be a retiree someday.

                              9.Thou shalt not curse thy husband when he's on
TDY on moving day.

                              10.Thou must never arrive at a new post/base
and constantly brag about how everything was much better
                              at the last post/base.

                               Author Unknown

                          Shit: Through the eyes of the Military

                              *An Army grunt stands in the rain with a 35
pound pack on his back, 15 lb. weapon in hand, after having
                              marched 12 miles, and says, "This is shit!"

                              *An Army Airborne Ranger stands in the rain
with a 45 lb. pack on his back, weapon in hand, after having
                              jumped from an airplane and marched 18 miles,
and says with a smile, "This is good shit!"

                              *A Navy SEAL lies in the mud, 55 LB pack on his
back, weapon in hand, after swimming 10 miles to shore,
                              crawling through a swamp and marching 25 miles
at night past the enemy positions, says with a grin, "This
                              really is great shit."

                              *A Marine, up to his nose in the stinking,
bug-infested mud of a swamp with a 65 LB pack on his back and
                              a weapon in both hands after jumping from an
aircraft at high altitude, into the ocean, swimming 12 miles to
                              the shore, killing several alligators to enter
the swamp, then crawling 30 miles through the brush to assault
                              an enemy camp, says, "I love this shit."

                              *The Air Force NCO sits in an easy chair in an
air conditioned, carpeted office and says, "My e-mail's
                              out? What kind of shit is this?"

Mythology

                                  The 5 Scariest Things in the Army!

                              1. A Private saying, "I learned this in basic
training..."
                              2. A Sergeant saying, "Trust me, sir..."
                              3. A Second Lieutenant saying, "Based on my
experience..."
                              4. A Captain saying, "I was just thinking..."
                              5. And a Warrant Officer chuckling, "Watch this
$%!#..."


Jeff - Cynthia  Sandherr said you were once again the person to write to. We
talked in the fall  of 1999 when I was thinking about bringing the energy
seminar to San Franciso in  2000. We did manage Alaska  last year after all,
so now I am trying to resume the regular alternation  between California and
Houston. I am several shades whiter of head as a result  of bringing the
Alaska trip to closure.
?
We did manage Alaska last year after all, so now I am trying  to resume the
regular alternation between California and Houston. I am several  shades
whiter of head as a result of bringing the Alaska trip to  closure.
??
17 senior military  and civilians in our group this year, who are really
interested in gas and  electricity matters, especially in CA. 14 students
including a BGen from  Croatia, and 3 faculty. We would like to call on you
and hear Enron's thoughts  on gas and electricity matters, both from a
California perspective and from the  point of date-certain national
legislation.
?
At this point,  the time that looks best for us would be Monday afternoon, 9
April. I am hoping  this will be possible for you - it will be just about 3
years to the day since we last visited your  California offices, in the very
first moments of electricity deregulation.
?
Draft schedule  attached for your consideration of where we are in the
planning  process.
?
Best  regards,
?

Maureen Crandall
Professor of Economics
Industrial College of the Armed Forces
National Defense University
Fort McNair, DC 20319
tel (202) 685-4319?? fax(202)  685-4175
 - IS2001 dom trav Cal.doc


--------------------------------------------------

Telecommunications Reports presents....

                                  TR DAILY
                                  Nov. 19, 2001
--------------------------------------------------
For a Web version of today's TR Daily, go to
http://www.tr.com/online/trd/2001/td111901/index.htm
--------------------------------------------------

Table Of Contents

TELECOM REGULATION
-- IXCs, Business Users Offer Plan For USF Collections
-- SBC's InterLATA Bid Okayed, Questions DSL Resale
-- Coalition Proposes Ultrawideband Regulatory Regime
-- `C' Block Auction Bidder May Challenge NextWave Deal

TELECOM BUSINESS
-- Global Crossing To Sell IPC Trading For $360M
-- Motorola Offers $260M For Optical Gear Maker
-- Cygnal Tech. 3rd Qtr Revenues Up, To $44.4M
-- Barak 3rd Qtr Revenues Up, To $40.7M
-- I-Link 3rd Qtr Revenues Up, To $27.1M
-- Avery Comm. 3rd Qtr Revenues Up, To $12.4M
-- Mobile Phone Shipments Down 9% In 3rd Qtr
-- BT Group Completes mm02 Spin-Off
-- Brightstar Forms Wireless Data Unit
-- Telecom Makes Top-10 Consumer Gripe List

CAPITAL MARKETS
-- Telecom Stocks Gain, TRDaily Telecom Index Up 0.8%
-- Verizon Prepares $5B Debt Sale After Hot AT&T Offering

PEOPLE ON THE MOVE
-- SBC Hires William Daley As President
-- Former Verizon Attorney Joins Firm
-- Mobility Concepts Names Marketing VP
-- BTI Telecom CFO To Resign
-- Rogers Adds Board Members From AT&T
-- Antenova Appoints New Director

************************************************************
TELECOM REGULATION
************************************************************
IXCs, BUSINESS USERS TEAM
ON PLAN FOR USF COLLECTIONS

AT&T Corp., WorldCom, Inc., and two groups representing business
users of telecom services have submitted a proposal to overhaul
the "broken and unsustainable" system governing how carriers
recover Universal Service Fund contributions from their custom-
ers.  But the proposal for a flat USF fee on every telecom
connection is likely to face opposition from incumbent local
exchange carriers and others.

Earlier this year, the FCC began looking at a variety of possible
changes to the way it collects USF contributions.  Among the
possibilities raised in the Common Carrier docket 96-45 proceed-
ing was whether contributions should be collected through flat
fees on customer bills rather than through fees based on inter-
state revenues.

The proposal now being floated by AT&T, WorldCom, the eCommerce
Telecommunications Users Group, and the Ad Hoc Telecommunications
Users Group would allow for collection of USF contributions
through flat fees on customers' bills.  Residential and single-
line business customers for wireline services would pay $1 per
month per line; residential and business wireless customers also
would pay $1 per month.  Assessments for pagers would be 25 cents
per month.

Multi-line business customers would cover the remaining USF
needs.  Under an "interim step" proposed to take effect Jan. 1,
2002, those needs would be calculated by taking the estimated USF
funding required for 2002 and removing the amount covered by the
other line charges.  The remainder would be recovered from multi-
line businesses with a per-line charge.

A "permanent solution" that would take effect one year later
would create three levels of per-line fees for multi-line busi-
ness customers.  Customers with a facility capacity of less than
1.544 megabits per second would pay the "level-1" USF charge,
customers with a capacity of between 1.544 Mbps and 45 Mbps would
pay five times that amount, and customers with higher capacity
facilities would pay 40 times the level-1 charge.

The basic level-1 charge would be set at the appropriate level to
cover the remaining funding needs of the USF.  The group said the
one-year interim period would allow carriers to develop the
systems they need to develop the "capacity-based assessments" on
multi-line business customers.

During a conference call with reporters this afternoon, Joel
Lubin, AT&T vice president-federal government affairs, said the
current system was not competitively neutral.  Customers of long
distance carriers pay for about 75% of the USF, he said, while
customers of local telephone companies and wireless carriers pay
dramatically less.  With USF funding needs increasing and long
distance revenues lagging, the current system can't be sustained,
Mr. Lubin said.  So long distance carriers want the system to be
based on "connections, not customers," he said.

The proposal is similar to one submitted by WorldCom in its
initial comments in the proceeding.  The groups represented in
the current coalition came together after the comments were filed
with the FCC in June and they submitted their proposal to the FCC
earlier this month.

Incumbent LECs have opposed flat-fee proposals in the past.  This
proposal appears to be no exception.  Lawrence E. Sarjeant, VP-
regulatory affairs and general counsel at the U.S. Telecom
Association, said a per-line charge was an "an unlawful way to
collect carriers' contributions" to the USF.  "It fails to
satisfy the requirement for a competitively neutral support
mechanism," he said.

"Every service provider benefits from the fund and every provider
should share the responsibility for contributing to the fund,"
Mr. Sarjeant said.  "The large IXCs' effort to change the univer-
sal service contribution mechanism is simply an attempt to fatten
their bottom lines at the expense of other telecommunications
carriers." -- Brian Hammond, bhammond@tr.com

			---------------

SBC's InterLATA BID WINS APPROVAL
BUT RAISES QUESTIONS ON DSL RESALE

SBC Communications, Inc., has won the FCC's approval to offer in-
region interLATA (local access and transport area) services in
Missouri and Arkansas, although questions raised about SBC's DSL
(digital subscriber line) service resale efforts have prompted
the Commission to promise a new proceeding to look at unresolved
DSL resale issues.

SBC now has authorization to offer in-region interLATA services
in each of its original five states -- Arkansas, Missouri, Texas,
Oklahoma, and Kansas.  The FCC found that it had met the 14-point
"competitive checklist" of market-opening steps outlined in
section 271 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.  Bell operat-
ing companies must meet those requirements before being cleared
to offer in-region interLATA services.

One area of controversy in the proceeding involved SBC's compli-
ance with one of those 14 points -- provision of wholesale
services to resellers.  Section 251(c)(4) of the 1996 Act re-
quires incumbent local exchange carriers to provide services at
wholesale rates to resellers.  The services subject to the resale
mandate are telecom services that an incumbent provides at retail
and to subscribers that aren't telecom carriers.

Some commenters told the FCC that SBC had failed to comply with
the resale mandate as it pertained to DSL services.  They said
SBC, in combination with its Internet service provider affiliate,
offered DSL service on the retail market and, therefore, should
make the underlying DSL transport component available to competi-
tive local exchange carriers (CLECs) for resale.

The FCC, however, said "neither the Act nor Commission precedent
explicitly addresses the unique facts or legal issues raised in
the case."  The FCC hasn't addressed a situation in which an
incumbent only offers DSL as part of an Internet access service
rather than as a standalone retail product, it said.

"We expect that how we decide questions about the regulatory
treatment of the underlying transmission facilities provided by
incumbent LECs to their affiliate information service providers
could have far-reaching implications for a wide range of issues
that would be more appropriately handled separately," the FCC
said.

"Accordingly, because Commission precedent does not address the
specific facts or legal issues raised here, we decline to reach a
conclusion in the context of this section 271 proceeding," it
said.  Instead, the FCC said it would initiate a proceeding by
year-end and would "endeavor to complete the proceeding as soon
as possible next year."

Some Commissioners appear to be leaning SBC's way on the issue.
Commissioner Kathleen Q. Abernathy wrote separately to address
the "difficult and complex questions" regarding SBC's DSL resale
obligations.  She said the FCC "appropriately concludes" that the
FCC can't find SBC in violation of the resale requirement because
it has "never held that an incumbent LEC's DSL Internet access
service -- as opposed to a distinct end-user DSL transport serv-
ice -- is subject" to the resale obligation.

Based on the "current record and existing precedent, it appears
that SBC's end-user Internet access service does not entail
provision of a telecommunications service at retail and, there-
fore, that SBC is not required to make that service available for
resale under section 251(c)(4)," she wrote.  "I note that my
analysis of this question is not free from doubt, and both I and
the Commission may adopt a different approach in the future based
on a fully developed record."

FCC Commissioner Kevin J. Martin made similar comments in his
separate statement.  "While the Commission may ultimately address
this issue in more detail, those who argue that this high-speed
Internet access service provided to end users should be subject
to section 251(c)(4) must show how, in light of [Commission
precedent], this is a `telecommunications service' being offered
at retail," he wrote.

FCC Commissioner Michael J. Copps called the ruling the "closest
of close calls."  He said the DSL resale proceeding "could
conceivably lead to changes in the implementation of the majority
decision to authorize SBC to provide" interLATA services in
Missouri and Arkansas.

"I am seriously troubled that, for small business and residential
customers, SBC does not make available for resale pursuant to
section 251(c)(4) any DSL service offerings," Mr. Copps said.
"The need to resolve these issues soon in the separate proceeding
is made even starker when one considers the harmful impact of the
failure to provide such an offering."  He worried that ILECs
could use the "loophole" to limit the availability of other
services for resale

Meanwhile, Qwest Communications International, Inc., chimed in to
say that its wholesale service performance is "comparable or
better on key performance measures" than SBC.  Steven Davis, Qw-
est's senior vice president-policy and law, said his company's
"overall level of performance is already as good or better in our
14-state region. . .than SBC's successful filings."  That shows
that "we're close to successfully reentering the long distance
business in our region," Mr. Davis said. -- Brian Hammond,
bhammond@tr.com.

			---------------

INDUSTRY COALITION PROPOSES
ULTRAWIDEBAND REGULATORY REGIME

An industry coalition has proposed a regime it says the FCC
should use for regulating ultrawideband (UWB) devices.  The
proposal includes prohibiting commercial UWB devices between 1
and 6 gigahertz.

In a Nov. 15 letter to FCC Chairman Michael K. Powell, the group
suggests that the Commission regulate UWB devices using the
following categories:  ground-penetrating radars, automotive
collision radars, communications devices, experimental devices,
and future categories of devices.

The letter was sent on behalf of 22 aviation, wireless, satel-
lite, and Global Positioning System companies and trade groups,
including the Air Transport Association of America, American
Airlines, Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, Lockheed Martin
Corp., U.S. GPS Industry Council, Nokia, QUALCOMM, Inc.,
WorldCom, Inc., Sirius Satellite Radio, and XM Satellite Radio.

The coalition proposed that the FCC (1) permit UWB ground-pene-
trating radar applications below 1 GHz, (2) permit UWB communica-
tions devices between 6 and 12 GHz and automotive collision radar
devices between 17 and 24 GHz, (3) prohibit commercial UWB
devices between 1 and 6 GHz, (4) limit out-of-band emissions so
UWB devices don't interfere with incumbent systems, (5) develop
an "expedited" UWB licensing scheme, (6) seek public comment
before adopting new regulations, and (7) permit experimental UWB
device use under the FCC's current rules.

The coalition also renewed its call for the FCC to adopt a
further notice of proposed rulemaking in its proceeding in
Engineering and Technology docket 98-153.  UWB companies say a
further notice is unnecessary.  FCC officials have said they plan
to take action in the proceeding by year-end.

UWB companies have maintained that the devices would be able to
operate between 1 and 6 GHz without causing harmful interference
to existing systems.  But UWB marketers have expressed some
willingness to compromise to address the concerns of other
spectrum users.  For example, in a Nov. 16 ex parte filing, one
such company, Time Domain Corp., said it would support restrict-
ing the eligibility of operators of outdoor tracking and radar
below 6 GHz in an effort to reduce the number of users. -- Paul
Kirby, pkirby@tr.com.

			---------------

`C' BLOCK AUCTION BIDDER
MAY CHALLENGE NextWave DEAL

A company that participated in the 1996 "C" block auction involv-
ing NextWave Telecom, Inc., said today it might file a court
challenge to the settlement involving NextWave, the U.S. govern-
ment, and other carriers.

Will Yandell, chief executive officer of Memphis, Tenn.-based
Eldorado Communications LLC, complained that the settlement
"effectively undercuts the integrity of the Commission's auction
process and the evenhanded application of the FCC rules."
Stephen Roberts, Eldorado's managing director, told TRDaily the
company could challenge the settlement in court.  "We think there
can and should be remedies for the guys who follow the rules," he
said.

Eldorado won three licenses at the C block auction but later
returned them because it said NextWave had pushed the prices for
the spectrum up too high.  On Nov. 7, the company filed an
emergency petition with the FCC asking the agency to halt all
private settlement negotiations (TR, Nov. 12).  It argued that
the negotiations violated FCC rules, the Administrative Procedure
Act, and constitutional due process guarantees.

On Nov. 16, the company filed a Freedom of Information Act
request seeking all documents and data related to the FCC's
participation in the settlement.

Under the settlement announced Friday, the U.S. government would
get about $10 billion, NextWave would walk away with about $5
billion, and carriers that bid on NextWave's licenses at an
auction earlier this year would get the spectrum (TR, Nov. 19).
The parties are seeking legislation that would codify the agree-
ment and direct courts to handle any challenges in an expedited
manner. -- Paul Kirby, pkirby@tr.com

************************************************************
TELECOM BUSINESS
************************************************************
GLOBAL CROSSING WILL GET $360M
FROM SALE OF IPC TRADING SYSTEMS

Global Crossing Ltd. bought IPC Communications, Inc., last year
because it needed customers.  It now is selling a large piece of
IPC because it needs cash.  But the $360 million generated by the
sale of IPC Trading Systems won't even fund Global Crossing
through 2002, according to one financial analyst.

Bermuda-based Global Crossing needs to collect $400 million
through the sale of "noncore" assets just to get through next
year, said Frank J. Governali of Goldman Sachs.  "Asset sales may
get Global Crossing through 2002, but under our revised assump-
tions the company will be in breach of its existing bank cove-
nants. . .The company is currently in discussions with the banks
to work out new covenant terms.  This is a critical piece of the
puzzle for Global Crossings's survival."

An investment group led by Goldman Sachs Capital Partners 2000
has agreed to pay cash for IPC Trading Systems, which provides
desktop units used by securities traders.  Global Crossing paid
$2.1 billion in stock for IPC in mid-2000.  The trading system
part of the business at that time was generating more than half
of IPC's revenue.  The remainder came from IPC's private networks
and Web-hosting operations.

Global Crossing acquired IPC to gain applications and users for
its global wholesale network.  IPC and its IXnet, Inc., subsid-
iary had a large customer base in the financial services market,
which was one of the vertical markets that Global Crossing was
targeting.

Included in the sale of IPC Trading Systems are its Asia-Pacific
assets, which Global Crossing transferred in July to its affili-
ate, Asia Global Crossing Ltd.  Global Crossing and Asia Global
Crossing will remain the preferred provider for IPC Trading
Systems's telecom needs, the companies said.  They didn't dis-
close how much revenue that business might generate for Global
Crossing.

Global Crossing also is attempting to sell Global Marine Systems,
an undersea cable construction business that it bought from Cable
& Wireless plc in 1999 for $885 million in cash and assumed debt.
"The divestiture of IPC, as well as other noncore assets such as
Global Marine Systems, will strengthen our focus on becoming one
of the world's leading telecommunications service providers and,
at the same time, improve our company's cash position," said John
Legere, chief executive officer of Global Crossing and Asia
Global Crossing. -- Tom Leithauser, tleithauser@tr.com.

			---------------

MOTOROLA OFFERS $260M FOR OPTICAL GEAR MAKER --
Motorola, Inc., has agreed to pay $260 million in stock for
Synchronous, Inc., a developer of optical networking equipment.
Motorola said the acquisition would bolster its suite of products
for cable TV system operators.  Synchronous offers products that
"greatly increase the efficiency, quality, and distance of
signals sent over fiber-optic cable," Motorola said.  Synchro-
nous, of San Jose, Calif., will become part of Motorola's broad-
band transmission network systems unit.  The companies expect to
complete the transaction in late 2001 or early 2002.

CYGNAL TECH. 3rd QTR REVENUES UP, TO $44.4M --
Cygnal Technologies Corp., which designs and manages broadband
and telecom networks, posted third quarter revenues of $44.4
million versus $31.6 million in the year-ago quarter.  Net income
for the most recent period also grew to $1.1 million from
$389,000 last year.

BARAK 3rd QTR REVENUES UP, TO $40.7M --
Barak I.T.C., an Israel-based international telecom services
provider, generated $40.7 million of revenue for the third
quarter, up from $27.2 million in last year's comparable quarter.
EBITDA (earning before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amorti-
zation) grew to $7.5 million in the most recent quarter from $0.9
million last year.

I-LINK 3rd QTR REVENUES UP, TO $27.1M --
I-Link, a provider of Internet telephony, said third quarter
revenues grew to $27.1 million from $5.5 million in the compara-
ble quarter last year.  Net loss for the most recent period shot
up to $20.5 million from $6.8 million last year.

AVERY COMM. 3rd QTR REVENUES UP, TO $12.4M --
Avery Communications, Inc., a provider of billing and customer
care services for telecom service providers, reported third
quarter revenues of $12.4 million, up from $9.6 million in the
comparable period last year.  Net losses after write-offs for the
most recent quarter were $1.9 million versus a profit of $149,000
last year.

MOBILE PHONE SHIPMENTS DOWN 9% IN 3rd QTR --
Worldwide mobile phone shipments in the third quarter of this
year fell 9% from last year's comparable period, according to new
figures from Dataquest, Inc.  The research firm blamed the
widespread economic slowdown and delays in the availability of
GPRS (general packet radio service) terminals for the drop in
shipments.  Nokia accounted for 33.4% of the 94.4 million phones
shipped in the third quarter.  Of the top-five producers of
mobile phones, Nokia, Motorola, and Samsung managed to improve
market share year-over-year.  Ericsson and Siemens lost market
share during the period.

BT GROUP COMPLETES mm02 SPIN-OFF --
British Telecommunications plc announced completion of the spin-
off of its mm02 plc mobile phone unit, and stocks of the two
firms began trading independently.  In late afternoon trading on
Monday, mm02 shares were trading at $11.95 each, and BT shares
were at $42.28, up $3.06 on the day.

BRIGHTSTAR FORMS WIRELESS DATA UNIT --
Miami-based Brightstar Corp. has formed a Global Wireless Data
division.  It will be headed by John Althoff, a former vice
president at Ericsson Mobile Phones.

TELECOM MAKES TOP-10 CONSUMER GRIPE LIST --
Consumer complaints about telecom companies and other utilities
landed on the top-10 list of the National Association of Consumer
Agency Administrators and the Consumer Federation of America's
10th annual survey.  Appearing on top-10 list for the first time
were consumer complaints about the Internet.  NACAA member
agencies said the biggest increase in complaints in 2000 were
about utilities (with an average increase of 52%) and the Inter-
net (with an average increase of 128%).  Among the specific
Internet complaints, problems with Internet service providers
(ISPs) came in third, just behind problems with merchandise and
auctions.  Several NACAA members called for additional enforce-
ment in the area of telecommunications.  They offered the follow-
ing suggestions: (1) Give consumer protection agencies more
authority to prosecute providers of wireless and wireline tele-
phony and cable TV service for unfair business practices; (2)
Adjust regulations to level the playing field between incumbent
local exchange carriers and new entrants; and (3) Provide for
state and local regulation of cell phone providers.

************************************************************
CAPITAL MARKETS
************************************************************
TELECOM STOCKS CONTINUE GAINING;
TRDaily TELECOM INDEX UP 0.8%

Larger telecom stocks racked up another day of impressive gains
on Monday as all major equities markets improved on continuing
good news from the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan, including reports
that Osama bin Laden is running out of room to hide from U.S.
forces.
The TRDaily Telecom Index tacked on another 8.7 points, or 0.78%,
to close at 1,130.  The index of 90 larger-cap telecom service
provider and equipment supplier stocks was inaugurated on Nov. 2
at a baseline value of 1,000 points and has gained 11% in value
since then.

Likewise, the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 109 points, or
1.1%, to finish at 9,976.  The S&P 500 average appreciated by
12.4 points, or about 1.1%, to close at 1,151.  The Nasdaq com-
posite average picked up 35 points, or 1.89%, to end the day at
1,934.

Leading the telecom sector higher was BT Group plc (known until
today as British Telecommunications plc), which spun off its mmO2
mobile phone unit on Monday.  BT shares gained $3.50 each, to
close at $42.25, while mm02 common finished its first day of
trading at $12.02 per share.  Elsewhere, telecom tech bellwethers
Ciena Corp. gained $1.74 per share to $21.16, and QUALCOMM, Inc.,
jumped $2.39 per share to finish at $62.47.

Loss leaders in the sector on Monday included Tellium, whose
common stock fell $0.28 to $5.37 per share.  The company an-
nounced late Friday it had filed papers with the Securities and
Exchange Commission that would allow the sale of up to 14.7
million shares of Tellium common stock on behalf of members of
management.

Mobile phone maker Nokia saw its common stock lose $0.37 per
share to $24.62.  Motorola's stock fell $0.57 per share to
$17.93.  A report released on Monday estimated that third quarter
worldwide mobile phone shipments had fallen by 9% on a year-over-
year basis. -- John Curran, jcurran@tr.com

For a Web version of today's TR Daily Telecom Index report with
graphics and index components, go to:
http://www.tr.com/online/trd/2001/td111901/index.htm

			----------------

VERIZON FILES FOR $5B DEBT SALE,
ON HEELS OF HOT AT&T DEBT OFFERING

Verizon Communications, Inc., today filed papers with the Securi-
ties and Exchange Commission for a proposed offering of up to $5
billion of debt securities.  Verizon's latest funding move came
on the heels of a hugely successful debt offering last week by
AT&T Corp., rock-bottom interest rates, and a deep list of
Verizon funding needs stretching into 2002.

Today's SEC filing by Verizon and its Verizon Global Funding
Corp. unit were for a debt shelf offering of up to $5 billion.
Once approved by the SEC, some or all of that amount of securi-
ties can be sold by the company on an ongoing basis.  According
to the SEC filing, Verizon may use proceeds from a sale to repay
short-term debt and for unspecified "general corporate purposes."

As for market demand, Verizon's timing hardly could be better.
Last week, AT&T Corp. went to market looking to peddle a $5
billion debt offering and came back with proceeds of $10.1
billion on big demand from both sides of the Atlantic.

Under current conditions, Verizon should receive at least as warm
a reception, bond traders told TRDaily.  "Any good paper at all
is going to get bought up," commented one trader, who explained
that continuing woes in the high-yield corporate bond market and
a recent tightening of spreads on U.S. Treasury debt has created
demand for higher-grade corporate debt.

AT&T, which has an "A-3" long-term credit rating from Moody's
Investors Service, priced its recent debt sale at between 2.5 and
2.9 percentage points above comparable-maturity Treasury yields.
The 30-year Treasury note as of Friday carried a yield of around
5.22% and the 10-year bill was yielding about 4.77%.

Should Verizon go forward with the debt sale, proceeds could be
directed toward any number of pressing financing needs.  Near the
top of the list would be $7 billion due on the $8.8 billion
purchase of spectrum licenses from bankrupt NextWave Telecom.

Earlier this month, Verizon Wireless filed an updated SEC filing
for its proposed initial public offering of common stock, which
has a hypothetical value of $5 billion.  Proceeds from that
offering, expected by the middle of next year, would be directed
toward repaying debt to Verizon Communications, buying spectrum
licenses, and funding capital expenditures.

In its quarterly report filed with the SEC last week, Verizon
Communications said it had devoted $12.4 billion to capital
spending for the first nine months of this year.  It expects to
shell out up to $4.7 billion for capital expenditures in the
fourth quarter.

Refunding of debt with shorter-term maturities also looms large.
At Sept. 30, Verizon listed on its books $18.8 billion of debt
maturing within one year, in addition to $45 billion of long-term
debt.  The company had $1.3 billion of cash and $5.9 billion of
unused bank credit at the end of the third quarter. -- John
Curran, jcurran@tr.com

************************************************************
PEOPLE ON THE MOVE
************************************************************
SBC HIRES WILLIAM DALEY AS PRESIDENT --
SBC Communications, Inc., has named William M. Daley its new
president effective Dec. 1.  He was vice chairman of Evercore
Capital Partners L.P.  He was also U.S. Secretary of Commerce
during the Clinton administration from 1997 to 2000.  Mr. Daley
is the brother of Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley.

FORMER VERIZON ATTORNEY JOINS FIRM --
James R. Young has joined the law firm of Hunton & Williams in
its McLean, Va., office.  Mr. Young is a former general counsel
at Bell Atlantic Corp., now Verizon Communications, Inc.

MOBILITY CONCEPTS NAMES MARKETING VP --
Lou Panetta has been named vice president-marketing for Mobility
Concepts, a wholly owned subsidiary of Denver-based Active Link
Communications, Inc.  He was president and chief executive
officer for Fujitsu Personal Systems, Inc.  Mobility is a wire-
less networking company based in Chicago.

BTI's CFO TO RESIGN --
BTI Telecom Corp.'s chief financial officer, Brian Branson, will
resign Dec. 15 to spend more time with his family, the company
said.  He joined BTI in 1992 and was named CFO in August 1996.
BTI is a competitive local exchange carrier headquartered in
Raleigh, N.C.

ROGERS ADDS BOARD MEMBERS FROM AT&T --
Canada's Rogers Wireless Communications, Inc., has appointed
Lewis M. Chakrin and Timothy Finnegan, both of U.S.-based AT&T
Wireless, to its board.  Mr. Chakrin is AT&T Wireless's executive
vice president-corporate strategy and planning.  Mr. Finnegan is
VP-sales.  Rogers Wireless, Inc., which operates under the Rogers
AT&T Wireless brand, is 51% owned by Rogers Wireless Communica-
tions, Inc., and 33% owned by AT&T Wireless.

ANTENOVA APPOINTS NEW DIRECTOR --
U.K.-based "smart" antenna maker Antenova Ltd. has named Peter
Radley a non-executive director to its board.  He is chairman of
Alcatel U.K.  Antenova is based in Cambridge, U.K.

********************************************************
TR DAILY Copyright 2001 Telecommunications Reports International,
Inc., (ISSN 1082-9350) is transmitted weekdays, except for
holidays.  Visit us on the World Wide Web at http://www.tr.com.
Published by the Business & Finance Group of CCH INCORPORATED.

Editor: John Curran
Associate Editor: Tom Leithauser
Associate Editor: Ryan Oremland
Associate Editor: Ed Rovetto
Publisher: Stephen P. Munro
1333 H Street, NW, 1st Floor-East Tower, Washington, DC 20005
Editorial Information: Telephone:  (202) 312-6060
                       Fax:  (202) 312-6111
                       Email: jcurran@tr.com
                              tleithauser@tr.com

Customer Service:      Telephone:  (202) 312-6050
                                   (877) 874-8737
                       Fax:  (202) 312-6116
                       Email: customerservice@tr.com

PLEASE NOTE:  This electronic publication is copyrighted by
Telecommunications Reports International. Redistribution or
retransmission of any part of this electronic publication --
either internally or externally -- is strictly prohibited.
Violation will be cause for immediate termination of your sub-
scription and liability for damages.  You may print out one hard
copy for your personal use. If you are interested in having this
publication sent to colleagues at your company, additional
authorized recipients may be added to your subscription for a
fee.  Call Subscriber Services, at (800) 822-6338, or send an e-
mail to customerservice@tr.com for more details.  If you prefer
not to receive TR Daily, please reply to customerservice@tr.com.
Federal copyright law prohibits duplication or reproduction in
any form, including electronic, without permission of the
publisher.


Vince, many thanks!  I will let our accounting department know.  Kim.


Feel free to copy all you want, assuming there is nothing too compromising!

"Lisa Clarke" <lisa@casa-de-clarke.com> on 08/07/2000 08:26:59 AM
To: Kay Mann <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: pictures

Hi Kay!

How are yall doing? We are doing okay. Katie had to be at her school at 8
for a band thing and you would think it was the darkest day of the year.
But, I think secretly she was looking forward to seeing her friends. Since
she's in 8th grade, she's feeling pretty big.

I accidentally brought home a roll of Paige's film. I think it's Paiges, it
has a picture of Mikey on it. But it could be yours. Anyway, there were a
couple of really cute pictures of your kids and mom and dad, so if it's okay
with you I would like to get some copies made for me to keep before I mail
the roll to you. Is that okay?

There are a couple of really cute picures of Paige carrying Michael piggy
back!

Take it easy!

Love you!

Lisa


Just wanted to give you a head's up.  We received last night from ED&F Man
their form of proposed Clearing Agreement with the OMLX.  It appears they
simultaneously sent it to the OMLX.  I am having my assistant fax a copy to
you.  I haven't had a chance to look at it yet, I'll do that first thing this
morning.  As you recall, we sent them the OMLX's form for signature a few
weeks ago, and they've now come back with their form.  I don't know how
customary it is to negotiate this with the OMLX?  Anyway, we'll take a look
at it here and give you a call.


Dr. Ueng:
I wanted to mention this to you yesterday after the test, but didn't have
time.  I was taking this course because I am applying to another business
school and since I have been out of school for six years I wanted to provide
the other schools with a recent academic record.  I was trying to get an A in
the class, but my first test was not my best work. I feel that I did much
better on the second test and that Brandon and mines case studies and my
class participation were good enough to get me close to the A level.  That
said if I am also able to get a recommendation from you I would greatly
appreciate it.  I know that you are extremely busy now, so if I could get in
touch with you at your earliest convenience that would be great.  Thanks for
making the class educational and quite enjoyable.  Hope to talk to you soon
and hope you can enjoy the rest of the summer.

Regards,
Ben Rogers
713-853-7998


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	group lunch

Date:		10/31/2000
Time:		12:00 PM - 1:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


CAISO (m. rostker) posted its version of the 24-25 Sep meeting and this is the generator's reply

GAC

-----Original Message-----
From: Joel.Newton@dynegy.com [mailto:Joel.Newton@dynegy.com]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:59 AM
To: kevin.cini@sce.com; sjfliflet@duke-energy.com;
thendricks@duke-energy.com; mstewart@calpine.com;
david.francis@dynegy.com; ajo@cpuc.ca.gov; hubert.burks@williams.com;
javery@sdge.com; Alvarez, Ray; chris.m.turner@mirant.com;
rob.hayes@mirant.com; jmeyer@reliant.com; ckebler@reliant.com;
jmcintosh@caiso.com; jdetmers@caiso.com; kellan.fluckiger@dgs.ca.gov;
crobinson@caiso.com; mrostker@caiso.com; twinter@caiso.com;
robert.pease@ferc.fed.us; bryan.craig@ferc.fed.us;
bruce.poole@ferc.fed.us; kaplan@iepa.com; hdayani@deloitte.com;
rjohn@water.ca.gov; tim.muller@williams.com;
dennis.elliott@williams.com; kent.palmerton@williams.com;
doug.parker@sce.com; mike.mackness@sce.com; harold.ray@sce.com;
cmpallence@duke-energy.com; gavaughn@duke-energy.com; sgreen@caiso.com;
eschmid@caiso.com; dfuller@caiso.com; tsiegel@caiso.com;
asheffrin@caiso.com; dlevine@caiso.com; sgerber@caiso.com;
rabernathy@caiso.com; dtimson@caiso.com; dpeters@caiso.com;
jmcclain@caiso.com; jthomas@reliantenergy.com; kbilas@reliantenergy.com;
debra.bolton@mirant.com; steve.huhman@mirant.com; dave.perino@enron.com;
acomnes@enron.com; jstrack@sdge.com; sghardiri@eob.ca.gov;
lwolfe@eob.ca.gov; rhoward@reliantenergy.com; zalaywan@caiso.com;
bet5@pge.com; rmk4@pge.com; cxg2@pge.com; krk2@pge.com;
ejgrammer@gkrse-law.com; gary.stern@sce.com; dkerner@eslawfirm.com;
byron@water.ca.gov; slee@water.ca.gov; zlazic@water.ca.gov;
dkk@eslawfirm.com; asibley@caiso.com; sgoodin@caiso.com;
kalmeida@caiso.com; khoffman@caiso.com; xgl@cpuc.ca.gov;
emm@cpuc.ca.gov; ykasarjian@caiso.com; ehildebrandt@caiso.com;
lkaimer@caiso.com; wregan@caiso.com; karen.shea@dynegy.com;
dean.nistetter@dynegy.com; kent.williams@dynegy.com; smutny@iepa.com;
khubner@caiso.com; braun@cmua.org; perlism@dsmo.com;
alex.goldberg@williams.com
Subject: Letter to FERC Commissioners

The attached letter concerning the Summary Report posted by the ISO on the
operations and reliability conference on Sept. 24-25 was submitted today to
FERC by a number of the California Generators.

(See attached file: Cal. Generator letter re ISO Summary Report.doc)


David,

This note is to give you my feedback on Jeanie Slone.

She has been extremely helpful with all personnel issues during the last six months.  Without exception she has satisfied any request I have made of her.  She has done an excellent job dealing with performance reviews (both good and bad), salary, and title issues.

Phillip


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

August 17, 2001 5:00pm through August 20, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:  NA

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:   ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  NAHOU-TSEOL13P
Time:  Fri 8/17/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 8/17/2001 at  11:59:00 PM CT
	Fri 8/17/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT  thru Fri 8/17/2001 at  9:59:00 PM PT
	Sat 8/18/2001 at  12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 8/18/2001 at  5:59:00 AM London
Outage:  Diagnose Hard Drive Problem NAHOU-TSEOL13P
Environments Impacted:  EnronOnline Terminal Server Users
Purpose: Maintain high availability for EOL environment.
Backout: None.
Contact(s): 	Andrew Hawthorn    713-853-6069

MESSAGING:  SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA:
Impact:  Market Data
Time:  Sat 8/18/2001 at  8:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 8/18/2001 at  9:00:00 AM CT
	Sat 8/18/2001 at  6:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 8/18/2001 at  7:00:00 AM PT
	Sat 8/18/2001 at  2:00:00 PM London thru Sat 8/18/2001 at  3:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Preventive maintenance reboot of BTRS servers
Environments Impacted:  Telerate Users
Purpose: Prevent system lockup
Backout:
Contact(s): 	Rick Le    713-853-5345

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:  ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  NAHOU-LN8
Time:  Sat 8/18/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 8/18/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 8/17/2001 at   10:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 8/17/2001 at  11:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 8/18/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London thru Sat 8/18/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  NAHOU-LN8
Environments Impacted:  Some Notes Users
Purpose: Compaq Insight Manager had detected a degraded drive in drive bay 1 port # 1.  We need to swap it out as soon as possible to avoid possible data loss.
Backout: Plug the old drive back in and schedule another longer down time with the messaging team.
Contact(s): 	Andrew Chiang    713-345-8209

SITARA:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 8/18/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 8/18/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT
	Sat 8/18/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 8/18/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT
	Sun 8/19/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sun 8/19/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London
Outage:  MS SQL Server Service Pack and Hotfix - Unify Gas
Environments Impacted:  Unify Users
Purpose: Addresses bugs identified in MS SQL Server 2000 affecting Unify Gas Production
Backout:
Contact(s): 	Brian Ripley    713-345-4709
		Bob Ward        713-345-4409
		Matt Pena        713-345-4209

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES: LONDON
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 8/17/2001 at    6:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 8/18/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT
	Fri 8/17/2001 at    4:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 8/18/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 8/18/2001 at  12:00:00 AM London thru Sun 8/19/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Complete Powerdown of the London office
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: Installation of a third generator at Enron House
Backout: Switch all equipment back on.
Contact(s): 	Tracy Pearson    830-34238 London Tie Line
                        24 Hour Support  830-37274 London Tie Line

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 08/01/00 04:03 PM -----

	Mary Cook
	07/31/00 05:42 PM

		 To: Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Jason Peters/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Considerations re Forms/Disregard Pior Form Message

Disregard prior message re forms and please review this attachment instead.

Mary


<<CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc>>  <<CALPINE MONTHLY GAS
NOMINATION___.doc>>

RICKY A. ARCHER
Fuel Supply
700 Louisiana, Suite 2700
Houston, Texas 77002
713-830-8659 direct
713-830-8722 fax

 - CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc
 - CALPINE MONTHLY GAS NOMINATION___.doc


Darren:

I zeroed the path on deal 284599, and left 4,500 pathed on 339604 at meter
4132, and pathed 5,000 for both deals 341801 & 341808 at meter 67 for 7/24
only.  I also notified Betsy Boring/Southern about the situation and
explained to her that any deal they make on EOL cannot be changed in any way,
however we would move the gas for the 24th only because we ok'd the change
before we realized it was an EOL deal.


Note that Enron Trading Ltd (Cayman) and Enron Metals (Malta) Ltd are
entities associated purely with this group.
The actual people involved are in the To: field below.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathryn Thomas/LON/ECT on 27/03/2001
10:51 ---------------------------

Bryan Seyfried
20/03/2001 13:12
To: Enron Credit London, Enron Credit Houston, Peter A Abdo/EU/Enron@Enron,
George DelCanto/EU/Enron@Enron, Ray Carter/NA/Enron@Enron, Angel
Tamariz/NA/Enron@Enron, Felipe Borlido/SA/Enron@Enron, Antonio
Vildoso/ENRON@enronXgate, Serene Ho/SIN/ECT@ECT, Manjeet Jones/EU/Enron@Enron
cc: Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Chivers/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R
Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley
Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Financial Markets Team

I am pleased to announce that the Financial Markets team led by  George Del
Canto and Peter Abdo in London and Ray Carter in Houston will be joining
Enron Credit effective 1 April.  In addition to an established business model
with assets across the globe, the team brings senior origination capabilities
in the global markets which will greatly increase our capabilities and
reach.  Please take the time to meet the team and share ideas.

Bryan


Thanks for the response.  I think that I've got it cleared up.  I'm assuming that the time for our case write is "the present," i.e., September 2001.  If I've got that wrong, let me know.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Barbara Bukhvalova [mailto:bukhvalo@haas.berkeley.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 5:50 PM
To: Jeffrey Dasovich
Subject: Re: Rockefeller Case

office number 643-1423 (I am not sure how much help I will be with the case
though)

At 09:43 AM 10/8/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>Greetings.  I have a couple of brief questions about the case.  Possible
>to contact you by phone at sometime today to discuss?  Greatly appreciated.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
>
>Note: To stop receiving these notifications, please uncheck the box
>labeled 'I want to be notified by email when course information is
>updated' in the 'Properties' section under the HOME menu bar.
>
>

Barbara A. Bukhvalova
PhD. Stdent, Finance/Real Estate
Haas School of Business
University of California, Berkeley


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 03:18 PM
---------------------------

Jason Moore
06/26/2000 10:44 AM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joel Henenberg/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Natural Gas Customers

Attached please find a spreadsheet containing a list of natural gas customers
in the Global Counterparty database.  These are all active counterparties,
although we may not be doing any business with them currently.  If you have
any questions, please feel free to call me at x33198.

Jason Moore


Hughes is a real piece of work.    I thought you should be aware of this.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:08 AM
To: Horton, Stanley
Subject: RE: EGAS 4th Qtr

I think I have this covered.    The issue is with Corp. planning and their requests, not the other Corp groups and Tracy and I have taken care of that.    Jeff didn't take it the way Jim has, in fact he welcomed the idea.    Jeff has told me that dealing with Jim might be an "experience".    Maybe you should ask Jim to raise the issue with me, or alternatively just let him know that you would like to be aware of the numbers before they go to Corp, which is all Tracy asked for.     Do you see "the tone of the message is demeaning" in Tracy's message?    Just curious.

-----Original Message-----
From: Horton, Stanley
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:58 AM
To: Hayslett, Rod
Subject: FW: EGAS 4th Qtr

FYI  Any suggestions?
-----Original Message-----
From: Hughes, James A.
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 7:52 AM
To: Horton, Stanley
Subject: FW: EGAS 4th Qtr

Stan:

I would like to discuss the below message when you have a chance.  There has been a lot of distrust and concern over "managed information" with respect to the international assets.  My team has overcome this by going out of our way to cooperate and be transparent with corp the last year and a half.  I am uncomfortable asking my people not to respond to corp requests for information.  I also think the tone of the message is demeaning and could have a morale impact on my folks.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Geaccone, Tracy
Sent: Tue 10/16/2001 11:28 AM
To: Sommers, Jeffrey E.; Lindsey, Mark E.; Schwarzbach, Stephen
Cc: Tran, Agatha; Hughes, James A.; Hayslett, Rod
Subject: RE: EGAS 4th Qtr

Please make sure your numbers go through me or Stan before we give them to Corp. Corp's request for these things should be coming through me in the future.   Rod and I are meeting with Stan on Monday, October 22.  We would like to discuss your 4th Q numbers then if possible.

Let me know.

Thanks

Tracy

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Sommers, Jeffrey E.
Sent:   Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:18 AM
To:     Lindsey, Mark E.; Schwarzbach, Stephen
Cc:     Tran, Agatha; Hughes, James A.; Hayslett, Rod; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:        EGAS 4th Qtr

Mark,

In response to your voicemail this morning, this is EGAS 4th Qtr per the 2nd CE.  It has been adjusted to pull out the items that have been transferred out of EGAS since the 2nd CE  ( Azurix International and South America Merchant ) and the transfer in of European Assets and the Middle East.   This does NOT include EPower which I understand will be transferred from Europe to EGAS in the 4th Qtr.   We are currently working on our 3rd CE and will send you those numbers when we are done.

Sommers  << File: EGAS4thqtr.xls >>


Hey Mom,

Enron just cut to junk status -- very bad for the company.  thought i would give a call but don't have your number
at work.  send it if you get a chance.

love,
coop

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richey Holly <Richey_Holly@prc.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Richey+20Holly+20+3CRichey+5FHolly+40prc+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, August 10, 2001 2:54 PM
To:	'Cooper Richey'
Subject:	FW: Pictures of Cameron--

FYI!

 - cam2year1.bmp << File: cam2year1.bmp >>
 - cam2year2.bmp << File: cam2year2.bmp >>


We will bill in February the full amount.  We will not bill any charges in March unless services are being provided.
This should apply to the Corporate charges as well.  The corporate charges should not be reallocated amongst only ETS companies.  They should be spread across all Enron Business units.

Thanks

Tracy

John Keiser
02/13/2001 08:13 AM
To:	Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Vera Apodaca/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Barney Brasher/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Karen Gruesen/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:	HPL Operations

Effective 2/16/01, approximately 65 employees will move over to HPL Co. 0012.  Please have Corporate and ETS charges to Co. 0584 stop as soon as possible as we will not be able to charge them to ENA.  These should be charged instead to Co. 0012.

Karen, if you have any specific comments on this please let me know as soon as possible.


TODAY'S HEADLINES
The New York Times on the Web
Thursday, December 14, 2000
------------------------------------------------------------
For news updated throughout the day, visit www.nytimes.com

QUOTE OF THE DAY
=========================

"The presidency is more than an honor, more than an office.
It is a charge to keep."

- PRESIDENT-ELECT GEORGE W. BUSH,

Full Story:
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/politics/14BUSH.html

NATIONAL
=========================

Bush Pledges to Be President for 'One Nation,' Not One
Party; Gore, Conceding, Urges Unity
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/politics/14BUSH.html

Affirmative Action Plan Is Upheld at Michigan
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/national/14MICH.html

Discarded Tapes Checked for Los Alamos Link
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/national/14LAB.html

Modified-Crop Studies Are Called Inconclusive
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/science/14BIOT.html

/--------------------- ADVERTISEMENT ---------------------\

Get a Jump on the Holidays

Visit NYTimes.com,s special Holidays section to prepare for
the festivities. This season, our shopping sleuths give you
the scoop on where to find the best gifts. Sign up for our
shopping e-mail to get exclusive deals from our partners.
Send e-greeting cards with classic New York Times Holiday
photos or treat yourself to a screensaver.

http://www.nytimes.com/pages/holidays/?ibd
\---------------------------------------------------------/

POLITICS
=========================

Bush Pledges to Be President for 'One Nation,' Not One
Party; Gore, Conceding, Urges Unity
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/politics/14BUSH.html

Man in the News: The 43rd President, George Walker Bush
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/politics/14BMAN.html

News Analysis: The Time for Mending
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/politics/14ASSE.html

Vice President Offers to Aid Bush but Admits Disappointment
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/politics/14GORE.html

INTERNATIONAL
=========================

Putin Pardons American Spy
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Russia-US-Prisoner.html

Clinton, in Ulster, Confronts Warring Passions Head-On
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/world/14PREX.html

As Charges Mount, Heat Increases for Chirac
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/world/14FRAN.html

Russian President Arrives in Cuba
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Cuba-Russia.html

BUSINESS
=========================

When Good Drugs Go Gray
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/business/14GRAY.html

Market Place: Cries of Alarm as Nasdaq Adds Details to Its
New Trading Plan
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/business/14PLAC.html

F.T.C. Action on Big Merger Set for Today
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/technology/14AOL.html

New Bush Status Does Little to Fuel Sustained Rally
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/business/14STOX.html

TECHNOLOGY
=========================

F.T.C. Action on Big Merger Set for Today
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/technology/14AOL.html

Economic Scene: Technology Rise and Fall Is as American as
the Model T
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/technology/14SCEN.html

Wearable Computers for the Working Class
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/technology/14WEAR.html

Hand-helds, Plain and Fancy
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/technology/14STAT.html

NEW YORK REGION
=========================

Graft's Legacy Will House City Museum
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/nyregion/14TWEE.html

Union Rebuts Claim That Teachers Aided Cheating
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/nyregion/14CHEA.html

After 5 Years, New Haven Drops Its Plan for a Big Mall
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/nyregion/14MALL.html

Two Continents, Disconnected
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/nyregion/14WIRE.html

SPORTS
=========================

Cowboys Can Rely on Enduring Helper
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/sports/14ANDE.html

Cowboys Add Mystery to Rivalry With Giants
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/sports/14GIAN.html

Testaverde Will Probably Play Lions
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/sports/14JETS.html

St. John's Weaknesses Are Exposed
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/sports/14STOR.html

ARTS
=========================

G_nter Grass on His New Book and His 'Strenuous Homeland'
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/arts/14GUNT.html

3 Couples, a Power Beat and a Sweet Aphrodisiac
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/arts/14AILE.html

Innovative Theater Space Is Planning an Expansion
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/arts/14SPAC.html

Casting Herself as 'Seussical' Savior, O'Donnell to Don
Cat's Hat
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/arts/14ROSI.html

OP-ED COLUMNIST
=========================

By WILLIAM SAFIRE: The Coming Together

George W. Bush, the non-loser who is president-elect, must
now begin to bring the country together.

http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/opinion/14SAFI.html

HOW TO CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
------------------------------------------------------------
You received these headlines because you requested The New
York Times Direct e-mail service. To cancel delivery, change
delivery options, change your e-mail address or sign up for
other newsletters, see http://www.nytimes.com/email

HOW TO ADVERTISE
------------------------------------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or
other creative advertising opportunities with The New York
Times on the Web, please contact Alyson Racer at
alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media kit at
http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo


We are one @enron.com!

Please be aware of the following senders were automatically notified to (a).
stop sending internet mail to your @ect.enron.com address and to (b). send
future internet communications to Daren.J.Farmer@enron.com :

fpam_@hotmail.com, mjones7@txu.com

REMINDER :
Your @ect.enron.com address should not be used any longer and will be
deactivated soon.  So please make sure these contacts switch to your new
@enron.com address.  If you have subscribed to mailing lists, please make
sure to update your addresses there as well.
AND
Your shortname@enron.com address (i.e. jsmith@enron.com) will continue to
work, even though your formal address is longname@enron.com (i.e.
john.smith@enron.com)

Please do not reply to this message as it was automatically generated.


Start Date: 1/2/02; HourAhead hour: 10;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


please type and send back
thanks


Folks
 OPIC, EXIM and the Department of State each raised the issue of Trakya
withTurkish Minister of Economy Dervis yesterday reflecting a unified front
of the USG on the issue.
 Harmon, Chairman of EXIM, apparently did not go into great detail on the
situation but EXIM staff had a side conversation with the Deputy Sec'y of
Treasury in which the issue was addressed in greater detail.
 At the OPIC meeting, OPIC focused on Trakya and went through the situation
in great detail.  Minister Dervis was not aware of all the details, but is
now.  He stated that the sector had to be cleaned up.  He noted that the IMF
deal had to first be struck but that the energy sector had to be addressed in
the "near term".   Drumheller's sense was that in the next several weeks
there would be definite action on the part of Treasury or both Trakya and the
USG need to take further steps.  He wants to go ahead and meet with the
lenders with an eye towards preparing the letters re the guarantee and then
gear up if necesary to beat on the GOT.
 Alan Larson, Undersecretary of State for Economic Affairs also spoke to
Dervis and stated to the Minister that the continuation of the Trakya
situation would become a major public issue between the US and Turkey.  That
this is now the official position of the Department of State is a huge step
forward.  Thanks John


Dear Sally,

We have been preparing this information daily.  Until the end of the year,
either Nancy or I will send it to you.  The full blown exception reporting
will start the first week of January, including elevation of issues (so you
won't get it every day anymore) when Christy starts.  I also have a
contractor currently developing an Access database to capture all exception
reporting info.

For the past few days, I have been hoping to spend time following up on the
issues, not only in the deal capture arena, but in all reporting. Once the
markets calm down, I'll be able to do so.

Best regards

Shona

---------------------- Forwarded by Shona Wilson/NA/Enron on 12/13/2000 12:07
PM ---------------------------

Nancy Hernandez@ECT
12/13/2000 10:36 AM
To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: consolidated Global Standards 12_1`2

Shona:

attached is the updated Global standards spreadsheet for Dec 12th.

Nancy


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000 12:33
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Enron General Announcements @ ENRON
11/06/2000 12:15 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Houston
cc:
Subject: Every Vote Counts!

Houston voters are facing a very exciting election this year. You will help
decide who represents you in federal, state and county offices.  You will
also help decide the outcome of important referenda, including whether to
approve a new downtown arena.

Elections will be held Tuesday, November 7, 2000 from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Precinct information is listed on your voter registration card.  If you don,t
have your card, you can turn to the Election Day edition of the Houston
Chronicle which will list Harris County precinct locations.  Precinct
information for other counties can be found by calling the numbers listed
below.

 Brazoria        979-864-1359
 Chambers     409-267-8309
 Ft. Bend        281-341-8670
 Galveston      409-766-2210
 Liberty  936-336-4670
 Montgomery  936-536-7885
 Waller            979-826-7711
 For further information, call
   1-800-252-VOTE

Presidential, State and Federal legislative candidate information can be
found on-line through the following link:  http://congress.nw.dc.us/enron/
Additionally, Voters Guides for Harris County published by the League of
Women Voters are available at EB4706c.

Remember:
EVERY VOTE COUNTS!


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 10:14
AM ---------------------------

Rhonda L Denton
03/27/2001 10:07 AM
To: Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Miguel L Garcia/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Incorrect Counterparties

Please note that I have corrected the following Deals to the accurate
Counterparty.  We trade power with NRG Power Marketing (not NRG Energy, Inc.
) and transmission for Oglethorpe is done through Georgia Transmission.

558121
560703

Thank you for picking the correct counterparty!!!


Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/04/01 03:45 PM -----

	boldham@reliant.com
	06/04/01 03:35 PM

		 To: carol.st.clair@enron.com
		 cc: jkgreene@reliant.com
		 Subject: Re: Update

Carol:

The attached two e-mails are in response to your inquiry of 6-1-01.  If you
have any questions, let me know.

Bill Oldham
Director, Insurance Risk Management
Reliant Energy Incorporated
Telephone No.713/207-3131
FAX No. 713/207-3251
email:    bill-oldham@reliantenergy.com
----
----- Forwarded by Bill Oldham/ADM/HouInd on 06/04/01 10:19 AM -----

                    Michael_Herrod@a
                    rs.aon.com              To:     boldham@reliant.com
                                            cc:     Dan_Burton@ars.aon.com,
John_Rathmell@ars.aon.com,
                    06/04/01 09:59          Kevin_Sparks@ars.aon.com,
Margaret_Buboltz@ars.aon.com,
                    AM                      Margaret_Gibson@ars.aon.com
                                            Subject:     Re: Update

In my opinion, the wording suggested by Janet Green should be acceptable.
We
will have to have this wording formally approved by the surety companies
prior
to issuance.  I would like to avoid approaching the sureties until all
questions
have been addressed and all changes have been made.  In regards the bonds
being
subject to Texas law, I do not see that as being a problem.  We will
address
that with the sureties along with other potential changes.

In response to previous email, neither Dan nor I know of an attorney that
would
be willing or able to write an opinion in regards the applicability of the
Appleton Law.  As discussed during the meeting, this law has nothing to do
with
the viability of an exisitng surety bond.  If a surety issued a bond that
was
later found to be in violation of Appleton, they would be fined by the
State of
New York.  It does not make the bond invalid.  MJH

----- Forwarded by Bill Oldham/ADM/HouInd on 06/04/01 07:32 AM -----

                    Janet K Greene
                                         To:     Bill
Oldham/ADM/HouInd@HouInd
                    06/03/01 05:23       cc:
                    PM                   Subject:     Re: Update(Document
link:
Bill Oldham)

What if we said:  "if the
Principal shall promptly and faithfully perform its obligations under the
Confirm, which is a part of and governed by the Master Agreement, then this
obligation shall be null and void"

With respect to her second point, what if we again said "an Event of
Default has occurred under the Confirm, which is a part of and governed by
the Master Agreement"?

I think she is trying to clarify in the language that the bond can be
called for an Event of Default under the Master Agreement, which could have
nothing to do with the Confirm - - - which is factually correct.

Janet K. Greene
Reliant Resources, Inc.
1111 Louisiana, Suite 4300
Houston, TX 77002
713-207-5732
fax: 713-207-0141
jkgreene@reliant.com

                    Bill Oldham
                                         To:     Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
                    06/01/01 09:27       cc:     Edward.Sacks@enron.com,
janet-greene@reliantenergy.com,
                    AM                   Wendy.Conwell@enron.com, Bill T
Hamilton/TTG/HouInd@HouInd, William
                                         Waller/ADM/HouInd@HouInd, Rex
Clevenger/ADM/HouInd@HouInd
                                         Subject:     Re: Update(Document
link:
Janet K Greene)

Carol:

Thankyou for the attached.  I believe the governing law for each issuing
surety will be the law where the surety is domiciled, but let me do some
checking and confirm this.  Also, will get back to you on your comments Re
the language in our recommended bond form...probably Monday or Tuesday next
week.  Thanks for your continued efforts in this matter.

Bill Oldham
Director, Insurance Risk Management
Reliant Energy Incorporated
Telephone No.713/207-3131
FAX No. 713/207-3251
email:    bill-oldham@reliantenergy.com

                    Carol.St.Clair
                    @enron.com            To:
bill-oldham@reliantenergy.com
                                          cc:
janet-greene@reliantenergy.com, Edward.Sacks@enron.com,
                    06/01/01 09:02        Wendy.Conwell@enron.com
                    AM                    Subject:     Update

Bill:
I spoke with our outside counsel yesterday and we have some more follow up
work that we need to do on our side.  One issue that may be of some
importance to us in our analysis is determining what the governing law of
the surety bond will be for each issuer, and more importantly, whether we
can have the bonds governed by Texas law.  Can you answer this for me?

Also, with respect to the form of the bond itself, as we mentioned at the
meeting, the language in the third paragraph which states that "if the
Principal shall promptly and faithfully provide the Firm energy as defined
in the Confirm, hen this obligation shall be null and void," does not work
for us.  Has anyone come up with alternative language?  Finally, with
respect to the Notice of Claim, we would like for the certification to say
something like, "an Event of Default has occurred under the Master
Agreement" rather than tie it to a specific default under the Confirmation.
Does that work for the sureties?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Attached, in Word and WordPerfect, is the current draft of the Hawaii I
Facility Agreement.  For ease of review, I have marked the agreement against
the current draft of the Hawaii II Facility Agreement.

Muriel C. McFarling
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
1717 Main Street, Suite 3700
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 659-4461
(214) 659-4784 (fax)

 - Hawaii_I.wpd
 - Hawaii_I.doc


NatGas is going to the moon on Monday!

Fletcj


Im doing gooooood!   I got crackers!

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 08/31/2000 07:57:12 AM
To: "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Are ya Driving with me or not???

The card was sincere... I didn't even talk about the most important person
in the card... that would be me!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are you doing okay???

I'm still going to request for reimbursement for your travel expenses... but
just in case... we should probably book something cheap.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 8:31 AM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: Re: Are ya Driving with me or not???

Oh great.  Lay the Dad guilt trip on me.  AND I just got your card
yesterday, another guilt trip think.

I think me flying back on 18th or 19th will be ok.  I'll verify afternoon
lunch and call you.

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 08/31/2000 07:08:54 AM

To:   "'Germany, Chris'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Are ya Driving with me or not???

Pack Date, September 13th - Have to be present
Load Date, Septemeber 14th - Have to be present
Close Date, September 15th - don't need to be there

I can leave on Friday, September 15th.

If you can't get off and or just don't want to do it... that's cool. I'll
just call my Dad.

Thank you
Chrissssssssssssssssssssyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Your P&L tonight was down 7,500, including Elsa and Carey.  Storage was 9,000
up.  The AGA was 133 withdrawal.  Your position is short 40.  We'll see you
tomorrow.

Dave and Bryan


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JSTEPENO>
To: Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com <??SJoe.Stepenovitch@enron.com>
Date: Monday, November 26, 2001 3:22:50 GMT
Subject:

Your message has been relayed
to the following recipient(s):

Rosanna.Migliaccio@robertwalters.com
Message relayed

The message was successfully delivered to 1 recipient(s)
at domain robertwalters.com.

 - C.DTF
 - C.DTF


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
02:00 PM ---------------------------

Jonathan Hoff
09/25/2000 01:27 PM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Albany


As Enron continues to innovate and move into new markets, our ability to
attract and retain world-class employees becomes ever more critical to our
success.  We view this challenge to be one of the most important
responsibilities of the Office of the Chairman.

One of the most successful efforts Enron has undertaken to attract talented
employees are the Associate and Analyst Programs.  To more closely align the
needs of our businesses with the recruiting process, effective immediately,
the Associate and Analyst Programs will report directly to the Office of the
Chairman.

Charlene Jackson, Managing Director, will have overall responsibility for the
Programs.  Charlene joined Enron in October 1999 from Salomon Brothers.
Charlene started her career at Salomon as an Associate and left as a Managing
Director.  As an investment banker she covered the energy industry.  She has
also had extensive experience with the Associate and Analyst programs.

Celeste Roberts will continue as director of the Programs and will manage the
daily operations.  Celeste joined Enron in December 1995 from McKinsey & Co.
She became director of the Programs in August 1999 and prior to managing the
Programs was director of the Merchant Services Program.

Cindy Olson, Executive Vice President, will continue to be actively involved
in the Programs, in addition to her responsibilities for Enron,s Human
Resources and Community Relations functions.

As Enron continues to innovate and move into new markets, the Programs will
change in response.  We will keep you apprised of those changes as they occur.


Just wanted to pass this on to you.  It was great to see you again the other
day.  Take care.
---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 10/07/99 04:33 PM
---------------------------

Brian Redmond
10/07/99 12:15 PM
To: Kevin A Howard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Vigeant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth W
Kaase/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Liewer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph
M Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, luitgard.fischer@enron.com, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N
Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed Wood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicole Alvino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katie
Stowers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen
H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhett Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron Green/GCO/Enron@Enron,
Charlie Thompson/GCO/Enron@Enron, Molly L Carriere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
Sheridan/GCO/Enron@Enron, Glen Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve -HPL- Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette
Miroballi/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Rome/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Flavin/GCO/Enron@Enron,
Barney Brasher/FGT/Enron@Enron, Patricia Anderson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wilson
Barbee/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Warner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Dumas/GCO/Enron@Enron
cc: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin P Hannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:

Congratulations!!

On behalf of all of the Asset Group I would like to extend our appreciation
and congratulations for making Hanover Measurement Services (HMS) a reality.
A year of creative effort and determination, has transformed the project from
the sale/leaseback of HPL's metering equipment into a viable measurement
services company.    HMS provides the opportunity to reduce HPL's operating
costs and leverage Enron's technical expertise to provide measurement
services to third party customers.

This project is an example of how the Asset Group must leverage our resources
and existing assets to create sustainable, recurring earnings in the years
ahead.  Each of you contributed to this success and your efforts are greatly
appreciated by HPL and senior Enron management.  Our task now is to expand
HMS' customer base and position the company to take advantage of emerging
measurement, communications and systems technology.

Again, congratulations on establishing and financing HMS, and please share
our appreciation with team members who assisted you in this success.

Regards,
Brian


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 08:54 AM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	10/26/2000 09:36 AM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (MS68) Name Change for Clearing Member Firm

Member Services Notice No. 00-68
October 24, 2000

COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC.

NAME CHANGE FOR CLEARING MEMBER FIRM

 Please be advised that the Exchange has been notified that effective October
6, 2000, MG London, Inc.  has changed it,s name to Enron Trading Services Inc.

 Inquiries regarding the above should be directed to the Member Services
Department at (212) 299-2370.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdoc
=(MS68)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Attached is the Final January 00 Weekly Cost Summary & Draw Schedule for the
99 Peakers with actuals through February 4, 2000.  The next report will come
out the beginning of March.  Please call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,
theresa
x58173


hey, how are you doing there kiddo?

Clay Guinn
EMPCo, Distribution,
  and L&PS GIS
800 Bell # 483-R
Houston, TX 77002
713.656.8246
clay.f.guinn@exxonmobil.com


Fundamentals of Corporate Finance - May 24 & 25, 2001
in EB552   Cost:  $700.00

Do need to improve your understanding of Financial Statements?

Do you want to learn how Financial Statements disclosure is linked to Enron
activities?

Are you interested in learning about analysis of projections or
Improving your understanding of ratio analysis?

If your answer is yes, then this class is for you.

For registration, please login and enroll through the InvestInMe website,
http://www.corptraining.com/index.cfm?company=enron.  If you have any
questions, please contact us at 713 853-3057.


Dear Eric,  Growing developments in Washington regarding Enron - second hearing has been added for this Thursday.  A complete list of who will testify remains up in the air.  We'll have all the details on hearings in the nation's capital from our Washington bureau on Tuesday.   A key Democrat in the U.S. Senate is taking the offensive Tuesday in the debate over national energy policy.  Days after the President renews his call for the Senate to act on his energy plan, Senator John Kerry (D-MA) is scheduled to deliver a speech on energy to the Center for National Policy.  Kerry will outline his ideas on how to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil and voice his criticism of the Bush administration's push to open a portion of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to exploration and production.    A federal court judge will hear arguments Tuesday regarding the destruction of Enron-related documents.  The hearing is in response to Amalgamated Bank's request to discover how and why Andersen destroyed Enron-related documents.  We'll have details on the hearing from the Houston bureau tomorrow.   Also from Houston on Tuesday, AES NewEnergy President Clem Palevich discusses deregulation and overcoming problems in the Texas market.  Join us for these reports from Houston.   Tuesday, West Coast Correspondent Kym McNicholas will discuss the California ISO's new Market Design Project 2002 with Harvard Economist William Hogan.  Hogan says the new plan is a step forward for the California electricity market.  Kym speaks with Hogan during the 3:00 p.m. ET newscast tomorrow.   Deutsche Banc Alex Brown Major Oil Analyst David Wheeler is also dropping by on Tuesday.  Wheeler will discuss fourth-quarter estimates for the major oil companies live from New York during the 9:00 a.m. ET newscast tomorrow.   Wrap Note: The NYSE was closed Monday due to the Martin Luther King, Jr. holiday.  We'll continue with commodity settles on Tuesday when the markets resume trading.   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests have to reschedule or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap Video Windows Media Player: 56K  |  100K  |  300K  Real Player: 56K  |  100K  |  300K  (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue, subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now    If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


ENE: Reiterate Buy; Believe Leadership Still Intact

* ENE has underperformed its peer group of Energy Merchants.  Stock
price down 39% from 52-week high ($90 on August 23) vs. peer group, up 1.9%.
* We reiterate our Buy rating on the stock, and believe the weakness
is largely due to concern over ENE's group-high P/E multiple and PEG ratio
of 27x and 1.3x, respectively (group average 19x and 1.0x), coupled with a
series of concerns over various parts of Enron's business: bandwidth, India,
etc.
* Our sense is that the bandwidth unit is performing on target, and is
likely to beat the strong numbers posted last quarter.  India, while a
significant issue, remains a small part of Enron's asset base (about 4%).
It is a legacy business, in our view, and does not materially affect our
overall view of the company.
* We see ENE's business fundamentals intact, and in fact, improving.
Growth rate expansion to 25% from 20%; growing returns on capital; bandwidth
trading all good reasons to own stock -- justify premium valuation.

 <<ENE 5-18-01 Reiterate Buy.doc>>  <<ENE 5-18-01 Reiterate Buy.pdf>>

Raymond C. Niles
Power/Natural Gas Research
Salomon Smith Barney
(212) 816-2807
ray.niles@ssmb.com

s

 - ENE 5-18-01 Reiterate Buy.doc
 - ENE 5-18-01 Reiterate Buy.pdf


-----Original Message-----
From: CWRentlInc@aol.com [mailto:CWRentlInc@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2001 9:37 PM
To: bussfam@sprintmail.com; CalPilot73@aol.com; crysk@hotmail.com;
MainWaves@aol.com; mkdeb1@hotmail.com; GEWhitaker@aol.com;
PD62Pepsi@aol.com; Littlegeneralb@aol.com; Hencomprss@aol.com;
Mkahook@aol.com; JCallCall@aol.com; JEBUSS@aol.com; BUnike@aol.com;
BayPumpWks@aol.com; JUDYORTEGA3@aol.com; ASchaef795@aol.com;
Kamberleeh@aol.com; KBuss9898@aol.com; Kellie@sgrcinsurance.com; Choyce,
Ken; khutson@nwol.net; COHOMEIMP@aol.com; pastormr@swbell.net;
mg@gwe.net; mhahn@vsta.com; andymail@sigecom.net; energycs@infi.net;
DELTASTARINTL@aol.com; nltravel@infi.net; OTCBOSS@aol.com;
WMHPRICE@att.net; rdearman@holtcompanies.net;
rdeisenbarth@communicomm.com; KTinyDancer@aol.com; SITTER5413@aol.com;
TEXBUZZARD@aol.com; Tracy@sgrcinsurance.com; Wayne.Caraway@natoil.com;
Wayne@sgrcinsurance.com; VALVEPARTS@aol.com
Subject: "One Texan is better than one hundred taliban".

> A large group of Taliban soldiers are moving down a road when they hear a
> voice call from behind a sand-dune.
>
> "One Texas soldier is better than ten taliban".
>
> The Taliban commander quickly sends 10 of his best soldiers over the dune
> whereupon a gun-battle breaks out and continues for a few minutes, then
> silence.
>
> The voice then calls out "One Texan is better than one hundred taliban".
>
> Furious, the taliban commander sends his next best 100 troops over the
dune
> and instantly a huge gunfight commences. After 10 minutes of battle, again
> silence.
>
> The Texan voice calls out again "One Texan is better than one thousand
> taliban".
>
> The enraged Taliban Commander musters one thousand fighters and sends
> them across the dune. Cannon, rocket and machine gun fire ring out as a
huge
> battle is fought. Then silence.
>
> Eventually one wounded taliban fighter crawls back over the dune and with
his
> dying words tells his commander, "Don't send any more men, its a trap.
> There's actually two of them."
>