Attached is a memo from our legal group with respect to moving the support of
the financial trading activities to Calgary.  Can you let me know the name
of the person in your organization that I should coordinate with on this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT on 06/12/2000
08:51 AM ---------------------------

Linda Sietzema
06/12/2000 09:39 AM
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nella Cappelletto/CAL/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark
Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: PROJECT DOORSTEP

Please see the attached memo from Greg Johnston.


If there's still space available, please enroll me in the March 14-15
Derivatives I class.  Here's my info:

Susan Scott
GPG Legal
RC#  0026
Supervisor:  Drew Fossum
SSN *********
713-853-0596
sscott3@enron.com

Thanks.


Don Baughman and Juan Hernandez.  If the listing you saw says Edwin Coulter,
he no longer is part of the group.

LC


It's an Amerex deal. I've changed it.

Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
01/24/2001 02:38 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb check out

504017  not there deal


Attached is the amendment to the field services agreement and a new
construction agreement for the incremental collection facilities.

Independant needs to prepare Exhibit A to the construction agreement.  This
is a description of the facilities to be constructed.  The construction
agreement is the exact form which was executed for the initial Collection
Facilities.  Please review and if everthing looks acceptable, please forward
to Independant.


Broadband Fight Still On Despite Megamerger
?????The proposed merger between Internet giant America Online and
entertainment behemoth Time Warner will do little to cool the ongoing fight
over how to regulate new high-speed Internet services, industry watchers said
Monday.

?????It is unclear how or whether AOL would allow competing Internet service
providers access to its proposed cable network, said industry analyst Bill
Whyman of the merger, currently valued at $350 billion. AOL has fought
aggressively over the past year in Congress, the Federal Communications
Commission and with local governments to force AT&T to open its high-speed
cable network to competitors.
?????"It's one of the monster issues," said Whyman, who is a principal at
Legg Mason's Precursor Group. AOL CEO Steve Case "said they're committed to
consumer choice. What we don't know is whether other ISPs besides AOL will
have nondiscriminatory access to Time Warner networks."
?????Whyman said the merger will likely turn the Internet into a video
vehicle quicker than initially expected, which will ultimately put pressure
on telephone companies to speed up their deployment of high speed digital
subscriber lines (DSL).
?????Barbara Dooley, executive director of the Commercial Internet eXchange
Association, said the merger proves that the marketplace is working, and that
it's too early to determine which way broadband will grow. She added that
smaller ISPs are still in a position to make deals with other broadband
providers.
?????"There will be other alternatives to cable," she said. "An ISP in a
particular area will not have to offer all options."
?????On the cable side, AT&T, a frequent sparring partner with AOL over
broadband issues, said the merger reconfirms the importance of cable
broadband.
?????"The proposed deal underscores the significance of broadband
distribution and it reconfirms the value of AT&T's considerable broadband
assets," a spokeswoman said.
?????And National Cable Television Association President and CEO Robert Sachs
boasted in a statement that the deal proves that cable is the future of
high-speed Internet service and that regulators have been wise to stay out of
the broadband fight to date.
?????The Baby Bells remained adamant in their argument that they need
regulatory relief to compete with the new mega companies like AT&T and now
AOL.
?????"This new mega-company would be providing cable, Internet and telephony
virtually regulation free," said David Bolger, spokesman for the United
States Telecom Association, which represents the Bells. "We have the shackles
and they don't."
?????The merger must pass muster with the Justice Department and the Federal
Communications Commission. The FCC had no comment on the AOL-Time Warner
announcement.

?		- by Rebecca S. Weiner
?		AntitrustAntitrust Anticipation Follows Merger Announcement
?????Opponents of the proposed merger of America Online and Time Warner
raised antitrust concerns Monday about the monopolization of the market for
high-speed Internet access and consolidation of content on the Web.
?????But proponents of the merger said the announcement underscored the
marketplace ability,s to resolve competitive concerns, and noted a combined
AOL-Time Warner would present a potent new competitor to Microsoft and to
AT&T.
?????"Consumers do not want to be beholden to a giant media-Internet
dictatorship, even if it promises to be a benevolent one," said Andy
Schwartzman, president of the Media Access Project, which issued a joint
statement with Consumers Union, the Consumer Federation of America, and the
Center for Media Education expressing strong reservations about what would be
the biggest corporate merger in U.S. history.
?????The groups are calling for the Federal Communications Commission to
require cable and other high-speed Internet access providers to open their
networks to competitors and asking that AT&T's ownership interests in Time
Warner are severed.
?????But others dismissed those arguments, noting that "over the past two
years, we have this phenomenon whereby a new merger or technology is
announced and some company is immediately put forward as the media giant,"
said James Gattuso, vice president for policy and management at the
Competitive Enterprise Institute, citing a string of prognostications about
SBC, BellAtlantic, Microsoft, AT&T, and now AOL-Time Warner.
?????If consummated, the merger is also likely to benefit Microsoft,s defense
against the Department of Justice,s antitrust lawsuit, said William Kovacic,
an antitrust law expert at George Washington University Law School. "The fact
that the industry environment is extremely turbulent and unpredictable and
can change the position of companies in a real hurry makes it hard to
prescribe remedies that won,t go into affect for two-and-a-half years."
?????A spokesman for Microsoft said the company had no comment on the merger.
?????Kovacic also said he anticipated a free-for-all among regulatory
agencies seeking jurisdiction to review the proposed merger, including the
Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the FCC, state attorneys
general, municipalities, public service regulatory bodies and foreign
governments.
		?????The merger's critics are particularly concerned that AOL will reverse
its long-standing argument to force broadband networks open.
?????"I think [AOL CEO] Steve Case is the Benedict Arnold of the digital
age," said Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Media
Education. "To me, what I heard today was a reversal of their public
position," said Chester.

?		- by Drew Clark
?		On The Hill
Lawmaker Calls For Antitrust Hearings
?????Senate Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee Chairman Mike DeWine, R-OH, said
Monday that the Judiciary Committee intends to hold hearings to scrutinize
the proposed America Online-Time Warner merger.
?????"It seems that this deal could make sense for consumers by creating an
organization that will deliver news and information more efficiently across
the video/broadband spectrum," DeWine said in a statement.
?????"However, whenever a dominant Internet company merges with a leading
media conglomerate, it raises a whole host of competition and public policy
issues," DeWine said. "One concern in particular is the impact this may have
on the so-called 'marketplace of ideas.' We need to examine the many
implications of this deal."
?????"This merger also adds a new wrinkle to the broadband 'open-access'
debate by potentially resolving it through private negotiation rather than by
government regulation," DeWine concluded.
?????In a statement released Monday, Senate Judiciary Committee ranking
member Patrick Leahy, D-VT, expressed more skepticism. "We will have to look
closely at whether it makes public policy sense to consolidate control of
content, cable and Internet service distribution channels," he said. "At some
point, all of this concentration and convergence has implications for
consumers because it will minimize competition and choice, giving us fewer
voices and fewer pipelines in the marketplace."
?????Although Leahy said, "this merger between one of the largest owners of
content with the largest provider of Internet services may have been
inevitable," he added, "an element of caution is only prudent given the scope
and impact of this planned merger."
?????"The great promise of the Internet has been to allow people a wide range
of information sources and choices," said Leahy. "What we should do is make
sure that all that information does not become funneled and controlled by
just two or three sources."
?????A spokesman for Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John McCain, R-AZ,
said he had no comment about the proposed merger.


Attached is the agenda for tomorrow's Financial Council meeting.  Handouts
will be distributed at the meeting (non-Houston locations will receive in
advance of meeting).  Please call me with any questions.  Thanks!


See attached Scott's # 37711

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000 02:53 PM -----

	Scott Goodell@ENRON
	08/23/2000 12:18 PM

		 To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Supply Agreements

David Eggleston will not be able to print the contract if it is emailed to
him.  Please send the confirmation and GISB contract to the following address
for these two sitara deals
373854
373850
Thank you,
Scott
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron on 08/23/2000
12:15 PM ---------------------------

"Egelson, David" <david.egelson@honeywell.com> on 08/22/2000 08:38:41 PM
To: "'Scott.Goodell@enron.com'" <Scott.Goodell@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Supply Agreements

Scott -

It was good talking with you today.  Would you be able to FedEx them to:
Dave Egelson, 78 Teaticket Path, East Falmouth, MA 02536 my Cell Phone for
this delivery is (203) 258- 3760.  If you could have it arrive on Thursday
(AM) that would work best.  Thanks, Scott, we'll get this thing behind us.

  - Dave


Oops.  I just found the address on the TA.  I will just FEDEX there.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001 05:42 PM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	02/28/2001 05:38 PM

		 To: "Crawford, Ann" <AnnCrawford@aec.ca>@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Transaction Agreement - Opal 5 Year Deal

Ann,  I am going to FEDEX the Transaction Agreement to you for sig.  What is
your address?


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000 05:45 PM -----

	Tom Moran
	05/25/2000 05:40 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts
and Facilities, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EOL / Credit / GCP Responses 5/25/00

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 5/25/00

Regards
tm


Jim,

I am scheduled to arrive in Austin on May 4 at 10:32 a.m.
I shall be glad to join you and a group of your colleagues for lunch.
I am flying back to  Houston Friday morning and we can meet for dinner after
the class.

I shall have a Power Point presentation on my PC. I can also
prepare a set of transparencies if this is more convenient for you.

Vince

Jim Dyer <Jim.Dyer@bus.utexas.edu> on 04/27/2000 05:44:51 AM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: Sheridan Titman <Sheridan.Titman@bus.utexas.edu>
Subject: Real Options

Vince,

 I am traveling at this time, attending a NSF meeting in Washington.
However, I wanted to touch base regarding plans for your presentation in my
class on real options next Thursday (May 4).  As you recall, the class is
from 3:30 to 6:30, and you could plan to take a significant part of that
time for your presentation.  Sheridan Titman has agreed to join us after his
class at about 6:00 for a 30 minute "panel discussion" with the students on
issues related to real options in practice.l

 I am not sure about your travel plans, but we would be happy to plan
lunch on Thursday with several of my colleagues.  I would also be delighted
to be your host for dinner on Thursday night if that is convenient for you.

 I'll be back in my office on Monday, and will look forward to
hearing from you.

 Jim

James S. Dyer
Fondren Centennial Chair in Business
Department of Management Science and Information Systems
CBA 5.202
The University of Texas at Austin
Austin, Texas 78712-1175

Email:  j.dyer@bus.utexas.edu
Telephone:  512-471-5278
Fax:  512-471-0587


Thanks Gerald, this info is helpful.  Do you know who owns the other 60%
equity interest in Bridgeline, and how the LP is structured to give Enron
50% control with only 40% interest?

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:32 AM
To: EJenkins@KelleyDrye.com
Cc: Robert.D.Morgan@enron.com
Subject: RE: Louisiana Resource License information

Eric,  The answers to your questions based on the information I have are:

     1.  The transaction closed on February 3, 2000.
     2.  All the licenses that you fowarded for Louisiana Resources are
currently being used by Bridgeline Holdings, L.P.
     3.  I don't know.  I don't think that any of the licenses were new
after the transaction date.  Robert, any different info?
     4.  To the best of my knowledge all of the licenses (that you
forwarded) are operating and were operating at the time of the transaction.
Do you agree, Robert?

To clarify, the assets were not sold to Bridgeline Holdings, L.P.  They
were contributed to the formation of the LP in consideration for Enron's
40% equity stake and 50% control.  No transfer applications for these
licenses has been filed.

Also, it is not clear from the information you forwarded whether the
licenses were in Louisiana Resources Company's (LRC) name or Louisiana
Resources Pipeline Company Limited Partnership (LRP).  LRP was merged into
Bridgeline Holdings, L.P.  LRC is still held 100% by Enron North America
Corp.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Jenkins, Eric" <EJenkins@KelleyDrye.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:46 PM
   To:     Nemec, Gerald
   Cc:     Pisciotta, Aileen
   Subject:  RE: Louisiana Resource License information

   Gerald, this is just to follow up on our prior phone conversations re:
   the
   sale of Louisiana Resources' assets (including licenses) to Bridgeline .
   As
   I mentioned, what is important to our inquiry is whether transfer of
   applications were filed prior to the consummation of the above
   transaction
   whereby the assets of Louisiana Resources' were acquired.  I will need
   the
   following transaction information:

   *  When did the transaction close?  The exact date. 2/?/2000
   *  Which licenses where part of that transaction?
   *  Which licenses were obtained by filing a new application after the
   transaction date?
   *  Which stations are constructed/operating?

   As a reminder, we are under a deadline to get this information to the
   FCC.
   To make the deadline I will need the information by tomorrow or Monday
   at
   the latest.  Please call/email with any questions.

   Thanks and have a Happy Thanksgiving.

   > -----Original Message-----
   > From:      Jenkins, Eric
   > Sent:      Thursday, November 15, 2001 5:41 PM
   > To:   'gerald.nemec@enron.com'
   > Subject:   Louisiana Resource License information
   >
   >
   >
   >  << File: 162802.doc >>
   >
   > ________________________________________
   > Eric D. Jenkins
   > Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
   > 1200 19th Street, N.W., Fifth Floor
   > Washington, D.C.  20036
   > (202) 887-1254
   > (202) 955-9792 (facsimile)
   > email:  ejenkins@kelleydrye.com
   >
   >
   >
   The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged,
   confidential, and may be protected from disclosure; please be aware that
   any
   other use, printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this
   communication may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you
   think
   that you have received this E-mail message in error, please reply to the
   sender.

   This E-mail message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses
   and
   are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect
   any
   computer system into which it is received and opened. However, it is the
   responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no
   responsibility is accepted by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP for any loss or
   damage arising in any way from its use.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged,
confidential, and may be protected from disclosure; please be aware that any
other use, printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this
communication may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you think
that you have received this E-mail message in error, please reply to the
sender.

This E-mail message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses and
are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any
computer system into which it is received and opened. However, it is the
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no
responsibility is accepted by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP for any loss or
damage arising in any way from its use.


Is this what you were thinking about?


Surprise, surprise - Mike checked with his broker at Amerex, who said he has
April written down for this trade. Mike asked him to re-confirm with his back
office. The contact in this deal is Bert Dunn, if you need to give them a
name of someone to speak to.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/16/2001 10:22 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 524310

Can you have Mike Swerzbin check this with Amerex.

Thanks!

deal 524310
Per Amerex the term should be March not April - term should be April


What I would like for my birthday is a cookbook by Paula Wolfert - "The
Cooking of South-West France"

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


Market Participants,

Several market participants have been engaged in a practice of scheduling
large amounts of non-firm counter flows on congested branch groups in order
to earn hour-ahead congestion revenues and then not providing those counter
flows in real time.  This occurred during a Stage 1 emergency on 7-20-00.
This practice creates a significant reliability problem for the ISO and is
to the detriment of market efficiency.

This notice is intended to inform Market Participants that the ISO
Department of Market Analysis considers this a potentially serious "gaming"
practice as defined in the ISO Tariff MMIP 2.1.3. The ISO DMA will be
investigating any Market Participant found to be engaging in this activity
and will take appropriate corrective actions.

CRCommunications
Client Relations Communications


Cathy:  attached is Mary's email which you may not have received.  Let me
know if you need a separatecopy of the existing (Global Custody) agreement
draft which ENA has negotiated with Chase.  I am hoping to conference in
Chase as soon as we can.

Also, Mary mentioned that you should verify with Richard Sage (Enron Credit
Ltd. in London) whether ECL is currently negotiating with BONY to put another
"Global Custody Agreement" in place.  He may be negotiating an almost
identical agreement (not necessary if Enron Corp. is the contracting party or
perhaps if ENA ).

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/04/2001 01:29 PM -----

	"mike perkins" <mperkins@ix.netcom.com>
	06/03/2001 04:09 PM

		 To: <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: <paul.garcia@enron.com>, <cathy.moehlman@enron.com>
		 Subject: Re: Enron North America Corp. ("ENA") Global Custody and Clearance
Agreement

Sara,
I have reviewed this briefly and have a couple of issues/comments.
I am concerned about the references to cash accounts.  I need to discuss
with the group.  ENA is not authorized to operate cash accounts.
Overdrafts and advances should not be permitted (sections 2Ciii and 4A)
I need to discuss FX with Laurel.  Again, ENA should not be operating cash
accounts.
Any verbal or fax instruction must be confirmed with callback or other
security procedures.  We have some sample call back procedures, test keys
are mentioned but are messy.  Need to discuss.  3C-authority to act should
be predicated on following the agreed procedures.  Maybe this is implied.
In 2, it is mentioned that info can be given.  I think it should be only if
required by law.
5A, generally, we don't allow fees to be debited.
5C I agree with you 5C is ugly.  I think this must be limited to the assets
in the specific accounts related to the agreement.
My number is 713 355 3814
Mary

----- Original Message -----
From: <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
To: <mperkins@ix.netcom.com>
Cc: <Sheila.Glover@enron.com>
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 4:46 PM
Subject: Enron North America Corp. ("ENA") Global Custody and Clearance
Agreement

> Mary:
>
> Attached is the latest draft from Chase.
>
> In particular, please take a look at the following paragraphs:
>
> 2.A (the definition of "Securities")
> 5.B (lien on securities)
> 5.C (setoff)
>
> The ENA contact is Gennaro Contella.  Please leave me or Sheila a voice
> mail and we can arrange a conference call on Monday with Gennaro, Nancy
> Callahan, if necessary (Chase legal) and anyone that you need to
conference
> in on behalf of Enron Corp.  The traders are anxious to have this account
> in place.
>
> Irrespective of which Enron entity takes ownership of this agreement, we
> were looking to you for information regarding existing Chase accounts (in
> ENA's name).
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Sara Shackleton
> Enron North America Corp.
> 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
> Houston, Texas  77002
> 713-853-5620 (phone)
> 713-646-3490 (fax)
> sara.shackleton@enron.com
> ----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2001 04:38 PM -----
>
>                     Nancy.K.Callahan
>                     @chase.com              To:
Sara.shackleton@enron.com
>                                             cc:
Gennaro.Contella@chase.com
>                     05/31/2001 01:45        Subject:     Enron Global
Custody and Clearance Agreement
>                     PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> As requested, attached is the final Agreement which I believe reflects the
> revisions we discussed this morning.  If this is acceptable, please have
> the Agreement executed on behalf of Enron and return the necessary
> counterparts to me for signature by Chase.  I will then return fully
> executed copies to you.
> (See attached file: Enron.doc)
> (See attached file: Enron.doc)
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000 04:49 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Steve Venturatos                           10/19/2000 02:45 PM

To: Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denver Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Ryder/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Gorons

Thought y'all might find this amusing.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000
02:45 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kelly Lombardi @ ENRON                           10/17/2000 06:34 PM

To: Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Gorons

Don't know who you're voting for, but here some things you might want to
consider-

What is a Goron

   1. Gorons sincerely believe that Vice President Gore is a true
environmentalist, when he has an environmental disaster on his own farm:
a polluting zinc mine, from which he received $500,000 of income last
year.

   2. Gorons likewise believe that the VP is antismoking and anti-tobacco
when  he has operated a tobacco farm for decades and accepted government
subsidies.

   3. Gorons truly believe that Gore is a Vietnam war hero, when in fact
he was  placed by family influence in a "cushy"  correspondent's job and
the only  action he saw was that of his Brownie camera! (and his bong)

   4. Gorons actually believe that Mr. Gore is justified in illegally
raising political funds from the Office of the VP, simply because the
Vanderbilt Law  educated VP claims he was ignorant of the illegality.

   5. Gorons further believe that it was OK for Al to accept large sums
of political money from China through Buddhist monks who had taken vows
of poverty, since he again claimed ignorance.

   6. Gorons also believe that the man who claimed to "invent the
Internet" would be so computationally ignorant that he could lose weeks
of potentially  incriminating e-mail!

   7. Gorons, incredibly, believe Gore's claim that he and Tipper were
the models for the book and movie, "Love Story" even though the book's
author,  Erich Segal, says not.

   8. Gorons, amazingly, believe that Gore will be the consumer's
champion against high gasoline prices although Gore holds a million
dollars in Occidental Petroleum stock.

   9. Gorons applaud Mr. Lieberman's open rejection of President
Clinton's immorality, but believe it was fine for Mr. Gore to remain
silent on the subject, while simultaneously declaring Mr. Clinton "one of
the greatest Presidents of our history."

   10. Gorons believe that Al Gore is an effective leader, when they
won't bother to look at his record as a Tennessee Senator, a record so
ineffective  that it has led to the election of Republicans as BOTH of
Tennessee's  Senators!

   11.  Gorons hold the belief that Gore is a compassionate man who will
be the working man's friend, in spite of the eviction notice he served
to the poor family who complained about the conditions of the run down
slum  house that he was renting to them.

   CAUTIONARY NOTE: Medical researchers acknowledge that Gorons are
generally harmless, except when allowed into a voting booth. There,
unfortunately, overcome by their gullibility syndrome, they are apt to
actually vote for Gore! They should be carefully protected from their
ailment, since it may be  harmful to their well-being, yours, mine and
that of the USA.

   Therefore, PLEASE, heed the Surgeon General's warning, reach out to
aid the Gorons in overcoming the syndrome, and,  PLEASE, pass this on to
your normal  friends, who might also know Gorons who need immediate
treatment.


Attached is the J.D. Irving deal we discussed.


Dear Customer:

Your priceline profile is ready to go.  The next time you return to priceline,
simply sign-in to activate your profile by typing in your e-mail address and
the answer to your sign-in question. Access your profile 24 hours a day to:

** Make fast and easy requests
** Check the status of a priceline request
** See all of your past priceline requests
** View and print your travel itineraries
** Change your personal settings

To access your profile just visit us online at http://www.priceline.com and
click on the 'My Profile' link on the home page.

To jump-start your priceline savings, we want to give you 60 FREE minutes
of U.S. long distance calling time.  Click the link below to give it a try now:

http://www.priceline.com/telecom/promo/fo.asp?pc=LPA001A

There's no purchase required and no fine print. Call anywhere in the U.S.,
day or night, from your home phone.

For your protection, priceline will never sell, rent, barter, share or in any other
way use personally-identifying information collected during your use of our
website without your prior permission.

Thank you for using priceline.com!


Records indicate that there are a significant number of employees who have yet to have a drug test.

Here are the details of the locations in Houston, Portland and other locations.

Please attend one as soon as possible to avoid delays in your your onboarding and payroll processing.

HR


I didn't see accumap added to the new list that was sent by chris behney,

the nova, oasis and power pool of alberta accounts that were added in yellow were inappropriately added as these are
not data sources that require purchasing, they are simply accounts to set-up much like a membership account


Trade qy8453 and qy9133 were both approved under the same credit terms.  The
$4MM LC that has been specified as an independant amount and the associated
$6MM credit line should be made a part of both confirmations and tied to both
deals.  Approval of these deals was based on the combined risk profile of the
trades, so securitization of both trades should be amalgamated.

thanks
brant

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Reves, Brant
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Bailey, Susan; Panus, Stephanie; Jones, Tana
Cc: Aguayo, Janie
Subject: National Energy Group

Please prepare an Annex B per terms of the attached credit worksheet and
provide a copy to the confirmations group for inclusion within trade qy8453's
confirmation.

thanks
brant

 << File: National Energy Group.xls >>


OK for me.

	Lisa Lees
	11/07/2000 03:20 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: US Gas Phy Index Firm 10-day Flexible non-TX>1Mo<1Yr - Approval
Required!

Tana/Karen:

The product long description below will fall under the new product type US
Gas Phy Index Firm 10-day Flexible non-TX>1Mo<1Yr.  Credit (Tom Moran) has
approved copying the profiles for the new product type from the following:

US Gas Phy Index Firm non-TX>1Mo<1Yr

Please respond by 10 a.m. on Wednesday, November 8.

Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 02:15 PM
---------------------------

From:  Melba Lozano
  11/01/2000 04:56 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B
Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: US Gas Phy Index Firm 10-day Flexible non-TX>1Mo<1Yr - Approval
Required!

Your review and approval of the following product type in the EOL Datamanager
is needed. This product already exists for products less than 1month.

Mark:  Stacey Dickson has already approved this language.

US Gas Phy Index Firm 10-day Flexible non-TX>1Mo<1Yr

EXAMPLE:

A US Gas Transaction with Enron North America Corp. (ENA), under which (A)
where ENA is the Buyer,  ENA shall deliver to Counterparty and Counterparty
shall receive a quantity of natural gas equal to the volume submitted by the
Counterparty via the website for delivery on each day during the Period of
Delivery (the sum of the daily volumes shall equal the 'Total Volume'), and
Counterparty shall deliver to ENA and ENA shall receive a quantity of natural
gas for delivery on each of the Purchase Dates during a calendar month, where
(i) the volume of gas delivered on any Purchase Date shall not exceed 10
percent of the Total Volume for that calendar month and (ii) the volume  of
gas delivered on all Purchase Dates shall be in increments such that that the
sum of said increments equals the Total Volume for that calendar month, or
(B) where ENA is the Seller,  Counterparty shall deliver to ENA  and ENA
shall receive a quantity of natural gas equal to the volume submitted by the
Counterparty via the website for delivery on each day during the Period of
Delivery (the 'Total Volume'), and ENA shall deliver to Counterparty and
Counterparty shall receive a quantity of natural gas for delivery on each of
the Purchase Dates during a calendar month, where the volume of gas delivered
on any Purchase Date shall not exceed 10 percent of the Total Volume for that
calendar month and the volume of gas delivered on all Purchase Dates shall be
in increments such that that the sum of said increments equals the Total
Volume for that calendar month. All deliveries shall be on a firm basis.

The Contract Price shall be the price derived from the Index for that
calendar month, as adjusted by the price submitted by the Counterparty via
the website. The Buyer shall pay the Contract price for each calendar month
during the Period  for gas received. The Seller shall pay the Index for each
calendar month for gas received.

The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of __ ___ 2000
to the Termination Date of __  ____ 2000.

The transaction is for delivery at Columbia, Appalachian. The Period of
Delivery shall be from the effective date through the termination date. The
Purchase Dates shall be each of no less than ten days as designated by Buyer
within each calendar month during the Period of Delivery. Buyer shall notify
Seller by facsimile of Buyer's designation of a Purchase Date by no later
than 10:45 a.m. Central Prevailing Time on the due date of the pipeline
nomination for the day on which Buyer desires the gas to flow.

The Index for each calendar month shall be the Columbia Gas Transmission
Corp., Appalachia (W. Va., Ohio, Ky.) price as listed in the section entitled
"Prices of Spot Gas Delivered to Pipelines", published in the first issue in
such month of Inside Ferc's Gas Market Report.

The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.

The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be millions of
British thermal units and the quantity shown shall be in millions of BTUs per
day.


Hello, I have sumitted a formal global counterparty request for this new
counterparty.  I will let you know when it is set up.

Thanks,
Melissa

   Kate Symes                04/09/2001 03:09 PM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New CTPY Request

I just heard from Samuel (thanks for your message!) that I need to send
Rhonda new counterparty information in order to get their names added to the
system. I called Rhonda, but it turns out she's out of the office for the
first part of this week, and her voice mail referred me to Melissa. (That's a
short explanation of why I'm sending this info. to all of you.)

Anyway, following is the information connected with the new counterparty name
Chris Foster has requested:

Name: Sierra Pacific Holding Company, dba Sierra Pacific Industries
Address: PO Box 496028
    Redding, CA 96049
Or: 19759 Riverside Ave.
      Anderson, CA 96007
Phone: (530) 378-8179
Fax: (530) 378-8139
Contact: Director of Energy Resources - Robert Ellery

I also have a copy of the Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement if you'd
like me to fax that over. Just let me know how I can help. We've already
entered Chris's deal into the system with "New Counterparty," so the sooner
we can change that the better.

Thanks,
Kate


===========================================================
Tour 18 Houston
November 21 2001
===========================================================
In this edition ...
1.   33 shopping days left until Christmas!
2.      E-club Specials
3.      Arnold Palmer Golf Academy in Orlando, FL
Do you know anyone who would be interested in this exclusive offering? If so, Please forward this newsletter to your friends, or, to have an address added to out list, please reply to Tour18Houston@Palmergolf.com with the word "ADD" in the 'Subject' line and include the new e-mail address.
You can now book your reservation on-line at
<http://tour18houston.golfreserve.com >
Or call 281-540-1818 to reserve your time
Get your Christmas shopping done early this year!  We are offering our E-club members $10 off and our U-club members $15 off our green fee gift certificates.  To receive this special rate please mention promotion #GC1121.
Special Gift Certificate Prices:
$75.08 E-club & $69.71 U-club  (Monday - Thursday Round)
$91.16 E-club & $85.80 U-club  (Any day Round)
Upcoming Green Fee Specials:
Course is in great shape!

THANKSGIVING DAY
Be home in time for dinner and football
Thursday 11/22/01 8:30 AM Shotgun Start (Field limited to 128 public golfers)
$55 per player

Saturday 11/24/01 before 8:00 am $65 per player (e-club) and (u-club) $55
                                Twilight Special 12:34 pm ? $48 per player

Sunday 11/25/01 anytime
$69 per player (e-club) and (u-club) $65 per player
* Sunday 11/25/01 price includes a complimentary round to be used Dec. 2, 2001 - Feb. 28, 2002 (excluding Saturday rounds)
Monday 11/26/01 & Tuesday 11/27/01
$56 per player (e-club) and (u-club) $46 ANYTIME
*Includes one sleeve of Titleist Tour Distance per green fee
Wednesday 11/28/01 before 11:00 am
$49 per player (e-club) and (u-club) $45

ARNOLD PALMER GOLF ACADEMY
World-class golf instruction offered year-round at Arnold Palmer's renowned Bay Hill Club & Lodge in Orlando, FL.  Voted one of the TOP 25 golf schools in the country by Golf Magazine.
E-Club specials (October 1 - December 30):

3-Day Academy Program ($1180):  Package includes 3-Day Academy and 3 nights accommodations at
the Bay Hill Lodge.  Rate is based on single occupancy, includes breakfast and lunch each day, and all
applicable taxes.
5-Day Academy Program ($1946):  Package includes 5-Day Academy and 5 nights accommodations at the Bay Hill Lodge.  Rate is based on single occupancy, includes breakfast and lunch each day, and all applicable taxes.

Please feel free to contact us with any questions or to receive information on double occupancy rates or instruction only rates.  We can be reached at 800-523-5999, ext 2, or visit us online at www.apga.com.

If you would like to unsubscribe from this list, please reply to Tour18Houston@palmergolf.com with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the 'Subject' line.
Your feedback is very important to us, please send us your comments by visiting either of these web-sites: http://www.tour18golf.com  or http://www.palmergolf.com  .
Again, thank you for your interest in Tour 18, America's Greatest 18 Holes.
Play the Tour !
's


At the last BIC meeting, NYISO indicated that it would "post" the list
resulting from the then-upcoming PPT meeting. Please do so ASAP.

Thanks
Aaron

---
You are currently subscribed to nyiso_tie as: paul.d.thomas@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nyiso_tie-629431H@lyris.nyiso.com


Tom Bres
713-654-8445

Scott Caven
713-654-8417


did you go on your vacation yet?  i hope you are not on it now b/c there is a
huge hurricane heading into the gulf.  you could end up like gilligan.


I will take a vacation day August 21, Monday for William's school orientation
and "Parent Briefing!"


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/15/2000 07:59 AM -----

	Corporate Benefits
	Sent by: Enron Announcements
	11/14/2000 06:40 PM

		 To: All Enron Worldwide employees
		 cc:
		 Subject: Open Enrollment 2001 Deadline


Did everyone see this?

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 10:53
AM ---------------------------

Sean Boyle@ENRON
10/24/2000 09:22 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Capacity Center

Chris, I just figured out why you did not see the e-mail, I did not send it
to you!!!!
Sorry, here it is.
Guys,
A friend recommended Capacity Center, a service that e-mails information on
capacity release, daily activity reports and system notices from pipelines on
a daily basis.  There is a filtering mechanism for each service by pipeline,
time frame and the critical nature of  the notices.  The cost is based on the
number of users and reports, for example if we signed up 3 users for 6 months
the cost would be approximately $3,000.  If you would like to check it out  I
have negotiated a free trial for 2 weeks (until 11/5/00).  Click here
http://www.capacitycenter.com/  the login name is sboyle@enron.com and
password is jackd.  Let me know if you would like an overview or see any
reports I can forward them to you via my e-mail.  Or you can call
Carol Christopher
CapacityCenter.Com
Business Solutions Manager
978-535-5868

Thanks,
Sean


DEAN, CLINT E,
?
You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance
Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process,
and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance
Management goals.
?
To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and
select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing
feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed
by Friday, May 25, 2001.
?
If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com
?
Thank you for your participation in this important process.
?
The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL
RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.
?
Employee Name:
JACOBSON, MICHAEL
THOMPSON, KERRI


how is everything going?  are you guys staying cool down there.  i know it
has been hot.  i will try to call soon.


you still here


The answer is yes but there will need to be contracts between MDEA and each
of the Cities.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 6:41 PM
To: drhunt@watervalley.net
Cc: wmontjoy@brunini.com
Subject: MDEA power contract/agency

David,

Is it possible for MDEA to purchase power from EPMI as an agent for the
Cities?  This will obviate the need for any type of security.

Thanks,

Kay


Opps.  I should add that Mr. Hodge has a free pass to miss this and all other
NW phone calls.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/25/2001 12:06
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
03/25/2001 12:04 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, jkeffer@kslaw.com,
mreurter@kslaw.com, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 200 Team meeting re NW exclusivity

Hi there,

Just confirming a 200 CST Enron team conference call.  Is this going to work
for everyone, with the exception of Carlos, who is now excused?

Kay


GADSDEN RESEARCH SERVICES'
FERCwatch
 Issued December 31, 2001

ELECTRIC / HYDRO Report:

Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., EC02-38-000 (12/26/01) -- Section 203 filing to transfer operational control over Montana-Dakota's jurisdictional transmission facilities to the Midwest ISO, effective February 1, 2002.
DOCUMENT LINK NOT AVAILABLE
REQUEST A COPY:  grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net> or call 202-210-4771.
_______________________________________

New York Independent System Operator, Inc., ER02-617-000 (12/27/01) -- Filing of Amended Rate Schedule 2 for Market Administration and Control Area Services Tariff, modifying the methodology for calculating the annual payments made to qualified suppliers of Voltage Support Service.
DOCUMENT LINK NOT AVAILABLE
REQUEST A COPY:  grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net> or call 202-210-4771.
_______________________________________

NewCorp Resources Electric Cooperative, Inc., ER02-623-000 (12/27/01) -- Revised and Amended Tariff for Electric Service providing wholesale full requirements service under Rate Schedule WP to unbundle the transmission service function from the power sales function for NewCorp's all requirements customer, Cap Rock Electric Cooperative, Inc.
DOCUMENT LINK NOT AVAILABLE
REQUEST A COPY:  grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net> or call 202-210-4771.
_______________________________________

San Diego Gas & Electric Company, ER02-635-000 (12/28/01) -- Revisions to Transmission Owner Tariff for a change in rates for the Transmission Revenue Balancing Account Adjustment and the Transmission Access Charge Balancing Account Adjustment.
DOCUMENT LINK NOT AVAILABLE
REQUEST A COPY:  grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net> or call 202-210-4771.
_______________________________________

Southern California Edison Company, ER02-636-000 (12/28/01) -- Annual update filng of the Transmission Revenue Balancing Account Adjustment and the Transmission Access Charge Balancing Account Adjustment in SoCal Edison's Transmission Owner Tariff.
DOCUMENT LINK NOT AVAILABLE
REQUEST A COPY:  grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net> or call 202-210-4771.
_______________________________________

Pacific Gas and Electric Company, ER02-637-000 (12/28/01) -- Compliance filing submitting (1) a change to the Transmission Revenue Balancing Account Adjustment in PG&E's Transmission Owners Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 5, (2) the annual change in Reliability Services rates under Reliability Services Tariff, Original Volume No. 10 and associated revision to the TO Tariff, and (3) a change to the Transmission Access Charge Balancing Account Adjustment in the TO Tariff.
DOCUMENT LINK NOT AVAILABLE
REQUEST A COPY:  grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net> or call 202-210-4771.
_______________________________________

NATURAL GAS / OIL Report:

Texas Eastern Transmission, LP, RP02-131-000 (12/27/01) -- Tariff revisions TETCO's Electric Power Cost Adjustment to be effective February 1, 2002.

DOCUMENT LINK NOT AVAILABLE
REQUEST A COPY:  grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net> or call 202-210-4771.
_______________________________________

Viking Gas Transmission Company, RP02-132-000 (12/28/01) -- Section 4 filing to revise Viking's rates for jurisdictional services to reflect current and projected costs and changes in demand on Viking's system.
DOCUMENT LINK NOT AVAILABLE
REQUEST A COPY:  grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net> or call 202-210-4771.
_______________________________________

[To request a copy of any of the above listed  filings, please call 202-210-4771; or send an e-mail to grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net>)]

GRS' FERCwatch e-mail notification is a free courtesy service of Gadsden Research Services, energy research and document retrieval specialists.  Periodically (generally once or twice weekly), GRS will broadcast FERCwatch with descriptions of major FERC issuances or filings such as rulemakings, policy statements, mergers, new rate filings, major rate changes, and certificate filings.

GRS can provide hardcopies of any of the above listed items at nominal charges; for document requests or estimates of charges, please reply to grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net> or call 202.210.4771.

For an e-mailed copy of a brochure of GRS services and rates for FERC and other federal agency research please e-mail your request to grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net>.  For a mailed copy, please include your name, firm name and street address.  For a faxed copy, please include your fax number.

The FERCwatch subscription list is used for the sole purpose of providing information on FERC and energy industry activity and will not be sold or otherwise distributed to any other business or organization.  For additions or removal from the FERCwatch notification list, please reply to grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net>.

Send suggestions on how the GRS' FERCwatch can better serve the energy community to grs4ferc@starpower.net <mailto:grs4ferc@starpower.net>.


Trader E-Mail for nightly P&L and Positions:

hunter-jessica@houston.rr.com, rjkdstevens@aol.com,
maryjanesames.tx@netzero.net, r_zivic@hotmail.com, jason.williams@enron.com,
mcmcsmarty@aol.com, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT


Things are going well here in the States.  Work is very busy right now and i
am actually training to  do the MS 150 Bike race.  It a race from Houston to
Austin.  It's a 170 mile, two day ride with about 5,000 bikers.  It's on
April 16th and 17th.  I rode this weekend only 40 miles.  Yes I am going todo
the NYC Marathon and for you virgins, I will kick your fat asses.  Darnit, I
wanted a pet Camel for our apartment.  Yes I got your message last week - I
had just stepped away from my desk and just missed you.  When do you get
back?  Sometime in the Summer.  By the summer I hope to be in the 185 range,
currently I'm right at 200!!!  Not very good.  I have been talking with Mike
Gioffre lately and were trying to get people together this spring or summer.
I'll let you know when.  Gotta go, but I'll talk to you soon.
Ben


Folks-
here is a summary of yesterday's meeting from Barbara.

Thanks,
Delaney

 - Summary of Tuesday 5 pm Meeting on DWR contracts.doc


Dear Ken:
Second, I want to give you a"heads-up" on a memo to the ACCF board of directors wich will arrive shortly by mail.  Both ACCF and some members of its board have been mentioned in the press around the country in connection with Enron, David Duncan (one of our directors), and you.  In addition, last week the Wall Street Journal name me as a board member in 1999, although as you know I retired in May of that year.
I wanted our directors to know how Mark Bloomfield and I have tried to handle a substantial number of calls from the press.  I have talked with no reporters and Mark has, I think, handled the few he has talked with very well.
Harmolyn and I and are praying for you in these temendously difficult and agonizing times.
                                                                                Charly


I will be in New York on business on March 30th.  Sorry that I will not be
able to attend.  The other person that I would send in my place is Beth
Apollo.  However, she will be on vacation next week.  Can you give me any
info that may be made available?  Thanks.

Gwynn Gorsuch@ENRON
03/22/2001 03:31 PM
To: Wilson Barbee/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daniel Brown/Enron@EnronXGate, Meliza
Evanson/HOU/EES@EES, Khymberly Booth/Enron@EnronXGate, Gerry
Gibson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Donald Miller/HOU/EES@EES, Thomas
Bowden/ENRON@enronXgate, Kim Cadena/HOU/EES@EES, Ted C
Bland/Enron@EnronXGate, David Oxley/Enron@EnronXGate, Toni
Graham/Enron@EnronXGate, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marla Barnard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Elisabeth Mends/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Paul Trieschman/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kalen Pieper/HOU/EES@EES, Gary P
Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Brian Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Schafer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen
Moore/Enron@EnronXGate, Billy Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Teresa
Bosien/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tim ORourke/Enron@EnronXGate, Rafael
Pina/HOU/EES@EES, Judy Gray/HOU/EES@EES, Calvin Eakins/Enron@EnronXGate,
Cathy Riley/Enron@EnronXGate, Lauren Iannarone/NY/ECT@ECT, David
Dupre/Enron@EnronXGate, Misha Siegel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Schwartz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dennis Vegas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Christa Aguilar/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Felecia Acevedo/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra Lighthill/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Valeria A Hope/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Mark Your Calendars: March 30 is Diversity/OLER Open House

You are invited to an Open House on
Friday, March 30, 2001

When:  9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

Where:   Conference Room EB 42c1

Why: Learn about:

? diversity recruiting sources, including upcoming conferences
? diversity training
? harrassment training (free!)
? EEO training for managers (free!)
? training/development conferences
? affirmative action:  what is it, what is it not, what it means for you
? diversity publications

Tell us:

? What will help your organization
? What will help you do diversity better
? How we can help you do your jobs better

Who: Your friends in Corp. Diversity and the Office of Labor and Employment
Relations

Bonus: Snacks and Munchies galore

See you there,

Gwynn Gorsuch
Enron Corp.
Workforce Diversity
713.853.7407 direct line
713.646.2144 fax


That will be fine.

D

Aimee Lannou   01/29/2001 04:17 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Equistar feb - 01

I think I found the deal.  Deal # 157572 has meter 1372 attached to it.  It
should be meter 1373.  The 10.000 is split between two meters, but all should
be at meter 1373.  Can I change it?

AL

---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 04:07
PM ---------------------------
Aimee Lannou   01/29/2001 03:59 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Equistar feb - 01

Daren - here are the Equistar #'s.  There should be a total of 65.000.  There
is  a new deal per Janice at Equistar at meter 1373 effective 2/01.  I have
not seen a deal for this.  Let me know if it is legitimate.  No volumes were
added, just moved from meter to meter.  (Deal # 378904)  Thanks.

AL


Rick Shapiro asked me to forward his response to me to the rest of the
Project Stanley team.

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT on 09/01/2000
10:20 AM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro@EES
09/01/2000 06:50 AM
To: Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Project Stanley - Recent Meetings with Alberta Government and
TransAlta

Absent Milnthorp's concern, I believe we should participate in coalitions and
issues that make business sense as this one appears to- While we need to be
cognizant of Stanley, it should be business as usual... so I would
participate if that were the decision we would make absent Stanley..... We
did nothing wrong in Stanley and this is an issue, i.e; B.C. Hydro/powerex
transmission market power that needs to be remedied. I would also ask
Milnthorp to reconsider his objection to participating while we're in
litigation - I think on issues like this where we have common ground that are
unrelated to the litigation, we need to rise above it and work to achieve the
common objective. Thanks.

To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES,
Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, awm@blakes.com,
glenn.leslie@blakes.com, dwm@blakes.com, Eric.Thode@enron.com
cc: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Project Stanley - Recent Meetings with Alberta Government and
TransAlta

"Privileged and Confidential"

Please note: I have not sent this memo to GPC.

1.  Meeting with Alberta Department of Resource Development

Rick Shapiro, Aleck Dadson, and I met with two senior officials from the
Alberta Department of Resource Development last week (Larry Charach,
Executive Director, Electricity  and Stan Wenger, Assistant Deputy Minister,
Gas & Alberta Markets) and it is our view that the ADRD is not aware of
Project Stanley based on some rather awkward questions we were asked by Larry
Charach relating to our views on whether Powerex has complied with the spirit
of the rules in Alberta.

2. Meeting with TransAlta and Other Alberta Marketers

I attended a meeting of Alberta marketers last week hosted and organized by
TransAlta's trading group.  TransAlta proposed the companies in attendance
form a coalition whose mandate and objective would be to retain counsel (U.S.
and Canadian) along with possibly other experts to assist the coalition in
formulating a strategy designed to address concerns of the invited market
participants with B.C. Hydro Power Supply, B.C.Hydro Grid Operations and
Powerex's alleged improper use of the Network Economy Tariff provisions in
the B.C. Hydro Wholesale Transmission Tariff.

The attendees at the meeting included representatives from 4 of the 5 Alberta
PPA Buyers, namely Enron, TransCanada Power, Engage Energy, and Enmax along
with Atco Power, PanCanadian, Duke Energy, and Aquila.  In addition, although
Bonneville Power Administration was not in attendance it was interesting that
TransAlta advised that BPA  shared TransAlta's concerns and was interested in
working with this group to address these concerns.

At the meeting TransAlta walked the group through a specific example of a
situation that occurred in May 2000 where TransAlta alleges that both it and
TransCanada Power were blocked from using scheduled interruptible
transmission capacity out of Alberta by B.C. Hydro Power Supply through its
use of the Network Economy provisions in the B.C. Hydro Wholesale
Transmission Tariff (which has a higher priority than interruptible
transmission) during a period when prices were considerably higher in the
Pacific Northwest than in Alberta.  As a result of the interruption of
TransAlta's and TransCanada's interruptible transmission reservation,
transmission capacity between Alberta/BC border and BC/US border became
available and was immediately acquired by B.C. Hydro Power Supply and used to
support Powerex exports during these periods into the U.S.    TransAlta
estimates the opportunity cost  of this curtailment to TransAlta was $2
million.

TransAlta's frustration is no surprise to Enron Canada.  I can advise that I
wrote a memo to John Lavorato dated March 17, 2000 in which I reviewed
Enron's concerns regarding the behavior of B.C. Hydro Power Supply  and
Powerex that is very similar to the allegations presented by TransAlta.  The
purpose of my memo to John L was to outline my initial thoughts on what Enron
Canada may wish to do to attempt to stop this abuse and was focused on the
idea of proceeding with a complaint to FERC that B.C. Hydro Power Supply and
Powerex were exercising transmission market power.   Enron Canada did not
pursue this any further at the time.

Among the ideas reviewed by TransAlta with the group to address and rectify
the abuse it alleges exist on the transmission path between Alberta and the
U.S. Pacific Northwest included:
 i) a complaint to ADRD and a request they become involved;
 ii) a complaint to the Alberta Market Surveillance Administrator;
 iii) a complaint to FERC;
 iv) a complaint to the BCUC;
 v) a complaint to the B.C. Government;
 vi) a complaint to the NEB;
 vii) a complaint to the Competition Bureau; and/or
 viii) a NAFTA complaint.

With respect to TransAlta's comments relating to the Competition Bureau, they
advised the group that they have spoken to the Competition Bureau about their
concerns and were told by the Competition Bureau that it is monitoring the
Alberta electricity market.   Based on the description provided by TransAlta
of its discussions with the Competition Bureau and other comments made by
TransAlta at the meeting I do not believe TransAlta is aware of Project
Stanley.    I believe the comments made by the TransAlta trader Enron's
trader last month about the Competition Bureau were not about Project Stanley
but were in the context of TransAlta complaining to the Competition Bureau
about B.C. Hydro Power Supply and Powerex's alleged abuse of the Network
Economy provisions in the Tariff.

The next step in the coalition building process is a meeting on September 11,
2000 of those companies that wish to proceed to form a coalition.  The idea
is that the coalition members would work out the terms of confidentiality
documentation prior to any member sharing historical information that it may
wish to provide relating to potential abuses by B.C. Hydro Power Supply or
Powerex.  In addition they intend to begin to consider which of the possible
courses of action described above would be most effective.  It appears from
the discussion at the initial meeting that the option that involves a
complaint to FERC is the most favored by TransAlta at this time.  Finally,
they intend to discuss a preliminary budget which TransAlta suggested may be
in the range of $500,000 Cdn if the group elects to proceed with a complaint
to FERC.

There are without question a number of reasons why a decision that Enron
Canada should not even consider having any part of this coalition in view of
the Project Stanley matter is the safest strategy.  Having said this, Enron
Canada has a significant commercial interest in seeing this coalition (with
or without Enron) achieve its objective to reduce or eliminate B.C. Hydro
Power Supply's and Powerex's ability to use the Network Economy Service to
block its competitors from access to import capacity into Alberta and export
capacity into the U.S.   Enron Canada's recent acquisition of the Alberta
Sundance B PPA (700 MW of capacity dispatch rights in Alberta) makes this
issue even more commercially significant as the ability to contract for
transmission capacity without the risk of a reasonable probability of
curtailment as a result of B.C. Hydro Power Supply invoking Network Economy
Service would represent a significant risk mitigant for Enron's Sundance B
long position.   There is also some benefit of participating in the coalition
to influence the direction it takes and to stay abreast of what it is doing.

I have discussed the matter with Rob Milnthorp and he agrees that the
decision to participate in the coalition would obviously have to be
considered and approved by those managing the Project Stanley issue.   If the
decision of the Project Stanley team is that Enron Canada must steer clear of
this coalition because of Project Stanley, then Rob M and other commercial
guys in ENA who do business with Powerex will not need to give further
consideration to additional reasons why Enron Canada may elect not
participate such as: i) the implications on Enron Canada's and ENA's
commercial relationship with Powerex, ii) whether Enron Canada  would be
prepared to commit to anything more than attending the first meeting of the
coalition with a view to understanding the nature of the confidentiality
obligations, the favored course of action, and the budget,  iii) whether
Enron Canada would explicitly reserve the right to withdraw from the
coalition at any time, and iv) whether Enron would want to be in a coalition
with BPA who I understand we believe may also be engaged in exercising
transmission market power .  To complicate this further, Enron Canada is
presently being sued by TransAlta over the interpretation of the wording in
two swap transactions and Rob Milnthorp has indicated that Enron Canada will
not agree to participate in any coalition with TransAlta unless and until
TransAlta discontinues this lawsuit.

I look forward to your comments and feedback on this issue.

Regards,

Rob


we will make it effective today so that, you can't stockpile players

Phillip M Love
08/21/2000 10:52 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Pick-Ups

The 17 limit I thought started for the first game.  That way we have a chance
to trade them.  Please advise.
PL


No changes on the numbers.

VE

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 9:18 AM
To:	Espinoza, Veronica
Cc:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	RE: Greeley Gas Company

Yes, we want the name on the contract to be Atoms Energy Corporation.  Let me know if you want to make and changes to the numbers.  Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Espinoza, Veronica
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:58 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	RE: Greeley Gas Company

Debra,

All of the thresholds and Mac's on the contract look good.  However, please confirm in which name the contract will be executed as, please.  I think that the contract should be executed with Atmos Energy Corporation.  In which case all of the references to Customer in the contract will have to be changed (as they all currently refer to Greeley Gas Company, a div....).  The problem is that we do term deals with Atmos as well (most of them) and if it is a division of the contract should be with Atmos and not Greeley Gas, a div.

Thanks and sorry about the delay,

Veronica

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 5:52 PM
To:	Espinoza, Veronica
Subject:	Greeley Gas Company

 Please look at the attached redline from Greeley regarding the credit sections.  As you may recall a previous discussion regarding the exact name for the contract, the contract will be in the name of Atoms Energy Corp.  Please let me know asap.  Thanks

  << File: Greeley (redline comments).doc >>

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


I do love chocolate malts though.  i guess that's what us low life forms live
on.

"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com> on 04/05/2000 02:13:02 PM
To: "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Cheese

and still are

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [SMTP:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 2:02 PM
> To: Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com
> Subject: RE: Cheese
>
>
> Big Bang??  Are you saying I was born out of the lowest form of life on
> earth?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com> on 04/05/2000 12:43:26 PM
>
> To:   "'Chris Germany'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  RE: Cheese
>
>
> I'll take you anywhere, anytime, but only if you truly believe in the
> theories of Evolution and the Big Bang - believe them even more than I do.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   Chris Germany [SMTP:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
> > Sent:   Wednesday, April 05, 2000 11:54 AM
> > To:     ingrid.immer@williams.com
> > Subject:     Cheese
> >
> >
> >
> > I guess you won't be taking me out for a cheeseburger this evening will
> > you ?
> >
>
>
>


Teaml,

I'm responsible for coordinating the next case - Teltronica, which is due
11/6. It happens that my parents are
visiting from the east coast that weekend. I thought that since we haven't
had a case due for a couple of weeks,
if there were any chance we could get the case done before the weekend that
would help out a lot. We're still two
weeks out from the due date, so we have a lot more time than usual, even with
the take home exam. Let me know if
you guys think we can try to hammer this out next week after the take home's
out of the way. As well as I recall,
SF has the first half, East Bay has the second this time.

Thanks,
Christine

Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:

> Based on last nite's discussion, here's the coordinator list:
>
>    Christine--11.6--Teltronica
>    Dylan--11.13--Nutra
>    Kim--11.1--Agro Feed
>    Jeff--11.27--Global Industries
>    Jimmie--12.4--Daimler-Benz
>
> We also decided that:
> 1) we'd continue with the SF/East Bay split
> 2) each group should combine the answers into one document prior to sending
> to the coordinator for final compilation
> 3) we'd distribute draft answers to the entire group, since some questions
> feed off of others
> 4) we'd get finalized responses to the coordinator no later than 4 PM on
> Sunday
>
> Let me know if this tracks with others' memories.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>
>                     Christine Piesco
>                     <christine.piesco@o        To:     Kimberly Kupiecki
<kkupiecki@arpartners.com>
>                     racle.com>                 cc:
Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com, dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu,
>                                                jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu,
jcjcal02@aol.com
>                     10/09/2000 01:49 PM        Subject:     Re: Teams
>
>
>
> I assume you all have already exchanged contact information. Mine is below,
> if
> there is a list of everyone's phone numbers could someone please forward it
> to
> me?
>
> Home: 415-928-7487
> Cell: 650-740-1097
> Work: 650-506-3640
>
> Thanks,
> Christine
>
> Kimberly Kupiecki wrote:
>
> > Hi Christine,
> >
> > We have been doing the cases via email up to this point.  We typically
> > divide up the questions and send each other our responses.  One team
> member
> > takes the lead on creating the "hand in" document.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > At 04:42 PM 10/4/00, Christine Piesco wrote:
> > >Glad to be aboard! When are we meeting? I am on campus Monday-Weds.
> > >
> > >Christine
> > >
> > >Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > Christine:
> > > >
> > > > Sorry I haven't replied sooner.  Crazy day.  Consider yourself the
> 5th
> > > > member of our team---but remember, no warranties included.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Jeff
> > >
> > >--
> > >Christine Piesco
> > >Industrials Account Manager
> > >Oracle Corporation
> > >500 Oracle Parkway
> > >Redwood Shores, CA 94065
> > >Phone: (650) 506-3640
> > >Fax: (650) 633-3753
> > >christine.piesco@oracle.com
> > >
> >
> > Kimberly Kupiecki
> > Senior Account Executive
> > A&R Partners
> > kkupiecki@arpartners.com
> > (650) 762 2800 main
> > (650) 762 2825 direct
> > fax (650) 762 2801
>
> --
> Christine Piesco
> Industrials Account Manager
> Oracle Corporation
> 500 Oracle Parkway
> Redwood Shores, CA 94065
> Phone: (650) 506-3640
> Fax: (650) 633-3753
> christine.piesco@oracle.com
>
> (See attached file: christine.piesco.vcf)

 - christine.piesco.vcf


Please distribute the recap of the meeting to your managers.
Thanks, hgm


Ose puts the blame where it belongs by pointing out that the ISO's favoritism towards DWR cost California billions in potential refunds.

ISO's role in sales is rapped: Critics challenge the independence of the power grid operator.
By David Whitney
Bee Washington Bureau
(Published Aug. 3, 2001)
WASHINGTON -- The independence of California's power transmission grid operator and its electricity sales to the state Department of Water Resources came under fire at a House of Representatives hearing Thursday.
But grid operators said there was no way that arms-length transactions with the Department of Water Resources could have been negotiated beginning in January when power blackouts were imminent and the state was the only buyer with money.
Rep. Doug Ose, R-Sacramento, chairman of the House Governmental Affairs energy policy panel, charged in a prepared statement to open the hearing that the cozy relationship between the DWR and the California Independent System Operator could result in the state forfeiting any claim to refunds for overcharges by power generators.
"The state's interference into Cal-ISO has possibly cost Californians billions of dollars in potential refunds," Ose said. "Moreover, it represents a serious violation of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations."
At issue is the fact that the ISO is run by a five-person board appointed by the governor when, under federal law, it is supposed to be independent. Additionally, the ISO's biggest customer is the DWR, which buys power using state money to firm up power deliveries by utilities too cash-starved to buy it themselves.
Last week, the FERC determined that the DWR would not be entitled to any rate refunds on its power contracts. In reaching that decision, the commission cited the agency's special access to information that gave it a competitive advantage over other purchasers.
Terry M. Winter, ISO president and chief executive officer, said that at the time the Department of Water Resources began buying power in January under these unusual circumstances, there were no other buyers willing to step in to keep power flowing to homes and businesses.
"That occurred because the market was not functioning," Winter said. "They were the only creditworthy purchaser purchasing power."
But Kevin Madden, the regulatory commission's top lawyer, said the relationship between the ISO and the Department of Water Resources raises troubling questions.
"DWR buying on behalf of the state is a market participant," he said. "It shouldn't be in the ISO control room. It shouldn't be allowed to cherry pick" among power sellers.
Madden said he expects the commission to rule soon on whether the ISO should be reconstituted to ensure its independence.

The Bee's David Whitney can be reached at (202) 383-0004 or dwhitney@mcclatchydc.com <mailto:dwhitney@mcclatchydc.com>.

You can see this story at: <http://www.capitolalert.com/news/capalert05_20010803.html>

Copyright ? The Sacramento Bee <http://www.sacbee.com/about_us/legal>


tHANK YOU!


Barbara:
Thanks for your request.  Those dates are good for you to visit the plants.
If you could e-mail a list of the names visiting the site and I will do the
same for you.  Please let me know the exact times that the teams will be
visiting the plants.  Thanks!
Ben Rogers
(713) 853-7998


christie....thx for the note....and for doing the interviews....for the record, i have no problem whatsoever with a 3.2 gpa, especially from a school like wharton....i'm disappointed out that we have an interviewer making a big deal out of that with a candidate.....thx, billy

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick, Christie
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:17 PM
To: Warner, Traci; Lemmons Jr., Billy
Subject: Fw: RE: Thank You

B and T,
I interviewed this guy yesterday, as did Chris M(can't remember his last name but he's a Director in Compression Svs Group).  For the record, but not to interfere with or prejudice the process, both Chris and I felt Aziz was, hands down, the best of about 10 candidates we interviewed. Paul does not have a blackberry or I wd sendthis msg to him.
Thks christiem
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: "Fakir, Aziz" <afakir@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON [NOTES:"Fakir, Aziz" <afakir@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON]
To: Patrick, Christie <Christie.Patrick@ENRON.com>
Sent: Wed Oct 24 11:46:49 2001
Subject: RE: Thank You

Hi Christie,
                   I just received your response and tried calling to thank you for interviewing me yesterday. Your personal and prompt email is truly representative of Enron's ability to not only hire but also retain the best and the brightest. Up until today I have found no recruiter to bring out the problematic issues of a firm. The very fact that you put Enron's current problems on the table shows how strongly and genuinely you feel about the firm being secure and stable. I really appreciated you letting me defend Enron; it not only shows you my passion but also reiterates my genuine interest in the firm.
I am writing to let you know that I had second rounds today as you know and in the first interview, which was supposed to be conducted by Jen Fraser but was conducted by Matt, a first year analyst, the concern was on GPA and academic performance rather that what value I can add or my keen interest in the firm. I was extremely shaken after this first interview; in the interview right after, Sarah, an associate, did manage to alleviate some of my concerns. However, I was wondering if this could possibly serve as a road block in the recruiting process as I really do not believe that my GPA is low or an accurate representation of my capabilities to perform on the job. I honestly feel that a 3.2 at Wharton equates to a much higher GPA at any other school in the United States.
Although disheartened, I am extremely interested in Enron as a firm and am confident that if given the chance I will emerge as one of your most valued candidates. Thank you so very much.

Sincerely,
Aziz.


We are looking to lock in some gas for May, June and July of 2002.  Would
you check with the traders on the price qoutes for 1,000 per day at Ventura.

May	1,000 per day

June	1,000 per day

July	1,000 per day

Please call me at 763-241-2490


John,

Here is the information for TW.
I will forward the others when they are complete.

Shelley,

John wanted the data as soon as complete.
This seems to be ok to me, but I do not know TW as well as you.
If you see anything which raises a question, please let us know.
I can check into it.
John can hold up working on it.

Frazier

---------------------- Forwarded by Frazier King/FGT/Enron on 12/19/2000
02:01 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Elizabeth Brown                           12/19/2000 10:49 AM

To: Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Bianchi/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Linda Trevino/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Nancy Bastida/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: INGAA Data Request - Marketing Affiliate Conference

Based on the criteria established in Shelley's initial email request and the
additional information gathered from our meeting yesterday afternoon, here is
the data I have compiled for Transwestern using an effective date of November
1, 2000.  I am still in the process of verifying one shipper's agency
services and will notify you if there are any corrections to be made to this
document no later than COB today.

If you have any questions regarding the spreadsheets, please feel free to
contact me at x3-6928.  I will be on vacation until next Wednesday, 12/27 but
staying in town.  If any issues arise during my absence, please contact Linda
Trevino or page me at (800) 718-0830.

Thanks,
Elizabeth


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
10:47 AM ---------------------------
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Coates/HOU/EES@EES, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: What we teachers go through

---------------------- Forwarded by Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000 08:55
AM ---------------------------

Wiekierak <disney@hia.net> on 10/28/2000 11:22:29 AM
To: "Brian Planz (E-mail)" <penst8wx@pdq.net>, "Chris Yetsko (E-mail)"
<yetsko@hia.net>, "D'Aoust's (E-mail)" <mandml@eznet.net>, "Jay Reitmeyer
(E-mail)" <jreitme@ect.enron.com>, "John Springer (E-mail 2)"
<jspringer@weather.com>, "Mark Walquist (E-mail)" <walquist@hia.net>
cc:
Subject: What we teachers go through

Little Johnny In School
>>>
>>>A teacher asks her class, "If there are 5 birds sitting on a fence and
>>>you
>>>shoot one of them, how many will be* left?" She calls on little Johnny.
>>>He
>>>replies, "None, they will all fly away with the first gun shot" The
>>>teacher
>>>replies "The correct answer is 4, but I like your thinking," Then little
>>>Johnny says "I have a question for YOU. There are three women sitting on
>>>a
>>>bench having ice cream: One is delicately licking the* cream. The second
>>>is
>>>gobbling down the top and sucking the cone.* The third is biting off
>>>the top of the ice cream. Which one is married?" The teacher, blushing a
>>>great deal, replied "Well I suppose the one that's gobbled down the top
>>>and
>>>sucked the cone" To which Little Johnny replied, "The correct answer is
>>>the
>>>one with the wedding ring on,...but I like your thinking.
>>>
>>>Math Class
>>>
>>>Little Johnny returns from school and says he got an F in arithmetic.
>>>Why?"
>>>asks the father. The teacher asked 'How much is 2x3' I said "6" But
>>>that's
>>>right!" Then she asked me 'How much is 3x2?' "What's the fucking
>>>difference?"
>>>asks the father. That's what I said!"
>>>
>>>English
>>>
>>>Little Johnny goes to school, and the teacher says, "Today we are going
>>>to
>>>learn multi-syllable words, class.* Does anybody have an example of a
>>>multi-syllable word?"* Little Johnny says "Mas-tur-bate"* Miss Rogers
>>>smiles
>>>and says, "Wow, little Johnny, that's a mouthful." Little Johnny says,
>>>"No,
>>>Miss Rogers, you're thinking of a blowjob."
>>>
>>>Grammar
>>>
>>>Little Johnny was sitting in class one day. All of the sudden, he needed
>>>to
>>>go to the bathroom.* He yelled out, "Miss Jones, I need to take a
>>>piss!!" The
>>>teacher replied, "Now, Johnny, that is NOT the proper word to use in
>>>this
>>>situation. The correct word you want to use is 'urinate.' Please
>>>use the word 'urinate' in a sentence correctly, and I will allow you to
>>>go."
>>>Little Johnny, thinks for a bit, then says, "Yu're an eight, but if you
>>>had
>>>bigger tits, you'd be a TEN!!!"
>>>
>>>Beautiful
>>>
>>>One day, during lesson on proper grammar, the teacher asked for a show
>>>of
>>>hands from those who could use the word "beautiful" in the same sentence
>>>twice. First, she called on little Suzie, who responded with, "My father
>>>bought my mother a beautiful dress and she looked beautiful in it."
>>>Very good, Suzie," replied the teacher. She then called on little
>>>Michael.
>>>"My mommy planned a beautiful banquet and it turned out beautifully," he
>>>said. "Excellent, Michael!" >Then, the teacher called on little Johnny.
>>>"Last night, at the dinner table, my sister told my father that she was
>>>pregnant, and he said,** 'Beautiful,.....just fucking beautiful!
>>>
>>>*****************************************************************


Feast your eyes on Enron Business' cool and colorful new look.  You'll find
it in your mailbox at home and online at home.enron.com under Publications,
Enron Business, and "Volume 1, 2001".  (And if you're in Houston, you might
find a few extra copies at the Plaza Java in the lobby of the Enron Building.)

In this issue:
? Enron Industrial Markets invigorates an "old economy" marketplace by
creating transparent trading systems for paper, pulp and steel;
? Jeff Skilling takes a look back at 2000 and tells us what to expect in 2001
) and gives us a few intimate details about himself;
? LNG becomes a promising option;
? Enron salutes the 100th anniversary of Spindletop;
? The Insider takes at look at how gas trading books work;
? Find out what you told us should be Enron's 2001 New Year's Resolutions )
and enter our Word Search to win a $50 American Express gift certificate!
Don't dally ) the deadline for entries is Friday, March 30; and
? Have you got an extreme hobby?  We want to know about it!  For details,
start reading(


Please see below.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Lech Kalembka" <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 3:21 PM
To:	Cook, Mary; Korkmas, Deb; Heinitz, Mary J.; Heard, Marie; Van Hooser, Steve
Subject:	UCC searches

Because of the, somewhat Byzantine, transition rules under the new UCC, if
the location of the chief executive office of any party against which we
are searching was different on July 1, 2001 than it is today, I would
appreciate it if you would let me know.  Thank you.

Lech Kalembka
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
100 Maiden Lane
New York, NY  10038
Tel.: (212) 504-6918
Fax: (212) 504-6666
E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,
Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within are forced or rescheduled outages. Your daily delivery will still contain these outages.
In addition to the two excel documents, there is a dbf file that is formatted like your daily deliveries you receive nightly. This will enable you to load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me know. Thanks.
Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.
 - OUTAGE.dbf
 - 012102R.xls
 - 012102.xls


Mike Swerzbin:
deal 521620
Prebon does not recognize

Mike Swerzbin:
I am missing a sell to Sierra Pacific 50 mw  Q2 Palo Verde  off-peak at $125


As per our discussion, the first step was to identify the participants in the retention program. The next step is to build the business case for why these employees are critical and irreplaceable to your business unit. Please provided a brief rational for why these employees were selected. Additionally, if there is a unique situation or circumstance that makes your area more vulnerable, please included in an overall business summary. For example: if your unit has a limited number of people supporting a critical area necessary to maintaining or increasing the value of the estate or the liquidation of assets, include this in your business summary.

Demonstrate why it would be difficult to train someone else to perform a similar function. You should also comment on why the employee was recommended for the Milestone Program.  As you know this information is time sensitive, so please try and get it to me as soon as possible.  I appreciate you taking time out of your busy schedule to meet with me on such short notice.  Please call me (5x3662) if you have any questions.

Regards,
Frank


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 11:45 AM -----

	"Jeff Seely" <JeffSeely_008118@netstock.customer-email.com>
	08/10/2000 11:37 PM

		 To: <sshackl@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: ShareBuilder News - Aug 2000

Dear Sara,

EXCITING UPDATES WITH SHAREBUILDER!
Last month I told you about some exciting things happening here with
ShareBuilder. Have you noticed it on our site yet? We've just added over
1,000 new stocks for a grand total that tops 3,000! There's never been a
better time to consider adding new stocks or index shares to your plan. Visit
http://www.sharebuilder.com and click on "ShareBuilder Stock List" today to
checkout the complete list.

Now you can make dollar-based investments in some of these new stocks.
Here's an example of a few with names you may recognize:

Bally Total Fitness Holdings  BFT
Comcast Corporation   CMCSA
Loral Space & Communications  LOR
Nabisco Group Holdings   NGH
Neiman Marcus Group   NMG B
Pepsi Americas    PAS
Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.  PETC
Readers Digest Association  RDB
Register.com Incorporated  RCOM
Revlon Incorporated   REV
Tommy Hilfiger Corporation  TOM
Viacom Incorporated   VIA

SHAREBUILDER.COM AFFILIATE PROGRAM:
Another exciting addition you might have noticed recently is our new
ShareBuilder Affiliate Program. Web portal sites that qualify to become
affiliates will be able to share the benefits of ShareBuilder with visitors,
and receive compensation.  If you have a business or work for a company that
has a web portal site and would like to provide a great investment tool for
your visitors, your organization can apply to become a ShareBuilder
Affiliate.  To find out more about our affiliate program, visit
ShareBuilder.com and click on "Become an Affiliate".

CREDIT UNION PARTNERS:
I'm also pleased to tell you that we've partnered with many credit unions
over the last few months - we now have dozens of credit union partners. These
partnerships let credit union members take care of all of their finances from
a single online source - from balancing checkbooks, to making mortgage
payments, and now watching long-term investments grow through ShareBuilder.
Two of our most recent credit union partners are among the biggest in the
nation: Boeing Employees Credit Union and The Golden 1 Credit Union. If
you're a member of either, look for ShareBuilder on these sites: becu.org and
golden1.com.

SAFECO PARTNERSHIP:
We also have entered into a partnership with SAFECO Corporation, one of the
leading insurance companies in the U.S. and a Fortune 500 company.  We
launched the SAFECO ShareBuilder last month, which is now available to direct
investors in its mutual funds at safecofunds.com.  This is the first
relationship we have announced with a major insurance company and are
delighted to be associated with SAFECO, both as a partner and as a major
private investor in our company.

CUSTOMER CARE:
If you have any questions regarding your account or ShareBuilder plan, feel
free to contact one of our customer care agents via email at
mailto:customercare@netstock.com or call us toll-free at 1-888-NET-STOK
between the hours of 6 AM and 6 PM Pacific Time Monday through Friday.

Best regards,
Jeff Seely President and CEO
Netstock Direct Corporation

P.S. You are receiving this e-mail because you have a ShareBuilder or
Netstock Direct Account setup with us.  You may unsubscribe, update or change
your e-mail preferences, by visiting the "Account" section of the
ShareBuilder site at http://www.sharebuilder.com or if you are a Netstock
Direct customer at netstockdirect.com.

ShareBuilder(tm) is brought to you by Netstock Investment Corporation, a
registered broker-dealer and a member of the NASD and SIPC.

This email was sent to:  sshackl@enron.com


Sounds alot like Skilling
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Williams [mailto:williams@tvmcapital.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 9:32 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Subject: On leadership

http://interactive.wsj.com/archive/retrieve.cgi?id=SB1006731723317077840
.djm&template=doclink.tmpl

November 26, 2001
Manager's Journal

Beware the Self-Promoting CEO
By Jim Collins.

Mr. Collins is the author of "Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the
Leap ... and Others Don't" (HarperBusiness, 2001). He operates a
management research laboratory in Boulder, Colo.

In December 1999, Carelton Fiorina appeared on the cover of Forbes
magazine above a three-inch headline, "The Cult of Carly." The article
-- titled "All Carly, All the Time" -- dubbed her activities the "Carly
Show." It described how she launched "Travels With Carly," a global
lecture tour aboard a $30 million Gulfstream IV -- something that no
previous Hewlett-Packard CEO had ever had, not even David Packard or
Bill Hewlett. But of course, Carly needed the Gulfstream to project her
image world-wide. "Leadership is a performance," she explained.

And perform she did. The article detailed how she appeared widely on
national television shows -- morning shows with Carly, Tom Brokaw with
Carly, Japanese television with Carly -- and how she launched a $200
million campaign with commercials featuring her talking about the
innovative spirit of HP. One was immediately left to wonder: Whose brand
was she building anyway? It sure looked like the brand of Carly would
soon eclipse the brand of HP.

The really striking point is that Ms. Fiorina had been on the job less
than six months before she posed for the cover of Forbes as a superhero
savior. She hadn't done anything significant. And now, two years later,
she still hasn't produced any significant results. During her watch, HP
stock has fallen more than 50% -- substantially underperforming the Dow
Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500, and falling nearly twice as far as
Apple, IBM and Sun Microsystems over the same period.

These results, combined with a negative reaction from the capital
markets to the proposed Compaq merger, put Carly in a tenuous position.
And now, key members of the Hewlett and Packard families have lined up
against her strategy, in part because it runs counter to the core values
that made HP great in the first place.

If Ms. Fiorina's tenure proves to be a failure (I hope not, but the
cards don't look good), it will be the most high-profile failure of a
woman CEO in history. And the real tragedy will be that some people will
pin the blame on the fact that she is a woman. "It just goes to show, a
woman can't handle a job like this," I can hear them say.

But to say that Ms. Fiorina is failing because she is a woman would be
entirely the wrong conclusion. Her failure has nothing to do with the
fact that she is a woman and everything to do with the fact that she is
the wrong type of leader. Anyone who led like Carly would also likely
fail.

A case in point is Mike Armstrong at AT&T. Like Ms. Fiorina, Mr.
Armstrong rode in as the great heroic savior. Like Ms. Fiorina, he put
on a good show and became a celebrity. Like Ms. Fiorina, he allowed
media hype about himself to overshadow the real nuts and bolts of what
needed to be done. Like Ms. Fiorina, he lurched after big splashy
acquisitions, despite the fact that there is no evidence whatsoever to
support the idea that a company can buy its way to greatness. (Two big
mediocrities never make one great company.) And like Carleton Fiorina,
C. Michael Armstrong has thus far failed to live up to outsized
expectations.

The real issue at hand is not male or female, but the type of
leadership. My research team and I recently completed a five-year
research project in which we systematically analyzed leaders who took
good companies and made them great. All the good-to-great leaders were
the complete opposite of Ms. Fiorina and Mr. Armstrong. They deflected
attention away from themselves, shunned the limelight and quietly
focused on the tasks at hand. One described himself as "more plowhorse
than showhorse," an apt description of all the good-to-great leaders we
studied.

We learned in our research that the most effective leaders never make
themselves the center of attention. They are understated yet determined,
quiet yet forceful. Most lack the liability of charisma. Indeed, the
very best ones overwhelmed us not with their ego, but with their
humility. They are ambitious, to be sure, but ambitious first and
foremost for their institutions, not for themselves.

Charles R. Walgreen III, for example, transformed Walgreens from a
mediocrity into a machine that produced cumulative stock returns that
beat Intel by nearly two to one, GE by nearly five to one, and the
general stock market by over 15 times from 1975 to 2000. These results
stem directly from Mr. Walgreen's stoic resolve to make a series of
tough decisions, such as jettisoning the entire food-service business
(which dated back to his grandfather and was quite profitable) because
it was not an arena where Walgreens could be the absolute best in the
world.

Few executives have the guts to get rid of profitable businesses where
their company can only be good, but never great. Mr. Walgreen not only
had the guts, but he made his decisions without fanfare -- quietly
taking action based on understanding, not bravado.

Yet despite these results, not once did Mr. Walgreen stand in front of
the mirror and point to himself as a key factor, preferring instead to
point out the window to credit the great people he had on his team. When
we confronted him with the undeniable fact of stupendous results created
under his leadership and pushed him to discuss his own role in getting
great people to make those results happen, he deflected again, and
pinned much of the credit for his success on being "lucky."

Now, you might be thinking, "But women leaders in a male-dominated world
cannot afford to be self-effacing. They need to show that they can be
more Patton than Patton, more Jack than Jack, so that people will take
them seriously."

Well, think again. Consider Katherine Graham of the Washington Post
Company, whose practical approach to leadership differed so dramatically
from Ms. Fiorina's that it's as if they came from opposite ends of the
solar system. When Graham became president of the Washington Post, she
did not position herself as the great leader or savior. In her own
words, she was "terrified." Shy, awkward and socially fearful, Graham
did not launch "The Katherine Tour" or create "The Cult of Katherine."
Reflecting on her early years atop the Post in her book "Personal
History," she hardly gives herself any credit whatsoever, writing that
she was surprised even to land on her feet.

But as with Mr. Walgreen, if you were to interpret Katherine Graham's
genuine personal humility as a sign of weakness, you would be terribly
mistaken. Just ask members of the Nixon White House, who were brought
down in large part because of her courage to stand absolutely firm
behind her reporters in their pursuit of the Watergate story. Even so,
she pinned the success principally on other people, the enduring core
values of the Post, and good luck. In a single paragraph summarizing the
whole Watergate episode, she uses the word "luck" or "lucky" nine times.
The only time she uses the pronoun "I" is to deflect acclamation for her
courage.

Katie and Carly. One took a good company and made it great, the other
has thus far taken a great company and made it good. One embodied the
type of leadership required for true greatness, the other has thus far
shown the type of leadership that erodes greatness. One saw the purpose
of it all as far beyond herself, the other has acted as if the supreme
purpose is herself.

I hope that Carly Fiorina grows into the type of leader that is required
to take a company from good to great -- a type epitomized by Charles
Walgreen and Katherine Graham -- and thereby leads HP back to greatness.
But if she does not, her failure lies in her inability to become such a
leader and not in the utterly irrelevant fact that she is a woman.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
URL for this Article:
http://interactive.wsj.com/archive/retrieve.cgi?id=SB1006731723317077840
.djm

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Printing, distribution, and use of this material is governed by your
Subscription Agreement and copyright laws.

For information about subscribing, go to http://wsj.com