FYI.  Did we talk to Leopold?  Might be useful to stress that that under
noncore/core (like Direct Access), customers choose from among a host of
competing providers for their service, not just Enron.

Best,
Jeff

California Lawmakers Eye Billing Businesses for Edison Rescue
By Jason Leopold
?
18:00 ET
Dow Jones Business News
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
Dow Jones Newswires
LOS ANGELES -- California lawmakers are mulling yet another set of ideas for
rescuing embattled Southern California Edison, and this time businesses would
be on the hook.
In an attempt to deflect charges of a bailout that have thus far stymied
efforts to restore the utility to solvency, legislators are now considering
ways to shift the burden of financing the rescue from residential ratepayers
to the state's largest businesses, aides to key state lawmakers said this
week.
The ideas being worked over by Senate President Pro Tem John Burton, Assembly
Speaker Robert Hertzberg and Assemblyman Fred Keeley have yet to take shape
as formal proposals. But an aide to Burton said some key lawmakers are so
"desperate" to keep Edison International (EIX) utility Southern California
Edison from following PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit Pacific Gas & Electric into
bankruptcy court that they are willing to consider anything that will takse
residential consumers out of the equation.
"The idea is that the large industrial customers are the ones who pushed for
deregulation in the first place, so they should be responsible for bailing
out Edison," the aide said. "We're looking to take the burden off of
residential ratepayers."
The premise of a plan discussed by lawmakers on a conference call Thursday is
to designate Southern California Edison's largest commercial ratepayers as
non-core customers. Those customers -- some 3,600 users of more than 500
kilowatt-hours a month -- would be responsible for financing the cost of
power the utility must purchase or have purchased for it in the wholesale
market. The non-core customers would also help the utility recoup most of its
$5.5 billion in unrecovered power costs through a surcharge on their bills.
Core residential customers would be protected from the wholesale power market
as the primary beneficiaries of the low-cost power the utilities generate
themselves or have locked up in long-term contracts.
Enron Pushing Access to Customers
Separately, Enron Corp. (ENE) has been lobbying lawmakers for several weeks
to win approval to sign power-supply contracts with Southern California
Edison's largest commercial customers, leaving the utility to serve just its
residential customers and small businesses, aides to Gov. Gray Davis, Messrs.
Burton and Hertzberg said.
An Enron executive confirmed that the company sent a four-page proposal to
Mr. Hertzberg proposing that Southern California Edison's large industrial
customers sign so-called direct-access contracts with Enron. Enron also has
recently made a presentation about direct access to some members of the
California Chamber of Commerce.
Under the proposal, heavy users would be required to contract directly with
companies like Enron for their power.
Direct access was a key part of the state's 1996 deregulation plan, but was
scrapped early this year when the state started buying wholesale power in
place of the utilities.
The core/non-core proposal is one of several being discussed by lawmakers as
alternatives to a memorandum of understanding Mr. Davis struck with Edison in
April. The MOU -- which doesn't vary much from an agreement in principle
reached in February -- has been called dead on arrival by some lawmakers, who
have been mulling various alternatives rather than moving the agreement
forward.
State Sen. Debra Bowen, a Redondo Beach Democrat and chairwoman of the Senate
energy committee, said there are so many "Plan B's" floating around the
Legislature that, "We're going to need to hire an apiculturist."
Steve Maviglio, a spokesman for the governor, said the Davis administration
is still dedicated to seeing legislation to enact the memorandum of
understanding move through the Legislature, but said separating the utility's
"core and non-core" customers would be at the forefront of new discussions.
It was too early to say whether the governor would support the plan, he said.
Dominic DiMare, a lobbyist with the California Chamber of Commerce, said the
chamber has told the Davis administration that shifting the burden of the
Southern California Edison bailout to businesses is "a very bad idea" that
could cost the state billions of dollars in economic activity.
"This [plan] would really screw businesses," Mr. DiMare said. "We just got
hit with a 50 to 90% rate increase. We're dangerously close to losing our
businesses to other states."
Write to Jason Leopold at jason.leopold@dowjones.com
Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.


Steve,

I am Mark's paralegal.  Why don't you go ahead and fax that agreement to me
at (713) 646-3490 and it will get the agreement signed and faxed it back to
you.  What is your fax number?

	Steve Howarth <steve.howarth@bea.com>
	05/30/2001 06:34 PM

		 To: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
		 cc: Francis Minor <fminor@bea.com>, Kevin.Montagne@enron.com, Mike Thack
<mike.thack@bea.com>, Tana.Jones@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: BEA NDA with Enron

    Mark,

    Thanks for the response.  Apparently the meeting is tomorrow, and we have
missed the FedEx deadline for today.  Shall I fax the signed NDA to you so
that
the meeting can go forward, and FedEx 2 originals to you for formal signature
processing?

    Steve

Mark.Greenberg@enron.com wrote:

> Steve -
>
> We are good to go on the agreement.  If you can sign on your end and have
> your people bring it with them to meet with Enron, we will get it signed.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Mark
> Senior Counsel, EWS
> Phone:     713-345-8897
> Facsimile: 713-646-3490
> E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
>
>
>                     Steve Howarth
>                     <steve.howart        To:     Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
>                     h@bea.com>           cc:     Kevin.Montagne@enron.com,
>                                          Tana.Jones@enron.com, Mike Thack
>                     05/30/2001           <mike.thack@bea.com>, Francis Minor
>                     01:01 PM             <fminor@bea.com>
>                                          Subject:     Re: BEA NDA with Enron
>
>
>     Mark,
>
>     Thanks for the message.  I am standing by - and I have signature
> authority,
> so I can turn around the NDA quickly.
>
>     Steve
>
> Mark.Greenberg@enron.com wrote:
>
> > Steve -
> >
> > Sorry for the delay on this end.  I have been waiting for one approval on
> > the non-solicitation provision I had forwarded.  I would suggest
> inserting
> > the language I suggested (another copy of which is attached) and
> preparing
> > final documents.  I should know later today or tomorrow if I have final
> > approval.
> >
> > Thanks again for the patience.
> >
> > (See attached file: BEA - nonsolicit language.doc)
> >
> > Mark
> > Senior Counsel, EWS
> > Phone:     713-345-8897
> > Facsimile: 713-646-3490
> > E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >                                     Name: BEA - nonsolicit language.doc
> >    BEA - nonsolicit language.doc    Type: Winword File
> (application/msword)
> >                                 Encoding: base64
>
> (See attached file: steve.howarth.vcf)

 - steve.howarth.vcf


Greetings from Amazon.com.

We thought you'd like to know that we shipped this portion of your
order separately to give you quicker service.  You won't be charged
any extra shipping fees, and the remainder of your order will follow
as soon as those items become available.

You can track the status of this order, and all your orders, online by
visiting Your Account at http://www.amazon.com/your-account.
There you can:
        * Track order and shipment status
        * Review estimated delivery dates
        * Cancel unshipped items
        * Return items
        * And do much more

The following items were included in this shipment:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Qty      Item                           Price  Shipped  Subtotal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
1        Barbie as the Sugar Plum Princ $17.99   1      $17.99
         Toysrus.com, LLC item sold by Amazon.com Kids, Inc.

1        Super Scooter Shannen 27 MHz   $39.99   1      $39.99
         Toysrus.com, LLC item sold by Amazon.com Kids, Inc.

1        Barbie Nutcracker Kelly 3 Pack $19.99   1      $19.99
         Toysrus.com, LLC item sold by Amazon.com Kids, Inc.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
               Item Subtotal:  $77.97
         Shipping & Handling:  $6.88
       Toys Shipping Savings: -$6.88
                       Total:  $77.97
                Paid by Amex:  $77.97

--------------------------------------------------------------------

You have only been charged for the items sent in this shipment.
(Per our policy, you only pay for items when we ship them to you.)
The following items will ship separately, as soon as they're available:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Qty      Item                           Price  Not Yet Shipped
---------------------------------------------------------------------
   1     Barbie in the Nutcracker: Marz $29.99      1

This shipment was sent to:

	Tracy L. Geaccone
	3811 Northwestern
	Houston Texas 77005

via UPS Ground (3-7 business days).

For your reference, the number you can use to track your package is
1ZA41W190345310383.  You can refer to our Web site's Help page or:

http://www.amazon.com/wheres-my-stuff

to retrieve current tracking information.  Please note that tracking
information may not be available immediately.

Unless otherwise noted, items are sold by Amazon.com LLC and taxed if
shipped to Washington or North Dakota. Please note that your order
contains one or more items from an Amazon.com partner and may be
subject to state and local sales tax, depending on the state to which
the item is being shipped. For more tax and seller information, visit:
http://www.amazon.com/o/sor?o=103-9399230-5559055.

If you've explored the links on the Your Account page but still need
to get in touch with us about your order, you can find an e-mail form
in our Help department at http://www.amazon.com/help.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please note: This e-mail was sent from a notification-only address
that cannot accept incoming e-mail. Please do not reply to this message.

Thank you for shopping with us.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Amazon.com
Earth's Biggest Selection
http://www.amazon.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------


Please review the attached scope of work and provide an estimate for the
services requested.  I would appreciate this estimate today.  We will have
the PSA to you for your signature first thing tomorrow.


Attached is my quick assessment of the VAR training.


Dear Eric,

I was referred to you by Kevin Hyatt.  Kevin and I worked together in the
ECT group.  At Kevin's request I have attached a r?sum? for your
consideration.  I have extensive experience in midstream field services and
business development.  I have implemented a number of complex projects
related to gas processing, fractionating, refining, petrochemicals, natural
gas and liquids gathering and transportation, and steelmaking and have been
instrumental in returning under performing assets to profitability.

An attribute that I can bring to the table is that I can relate to the
employees on all levels due to the practical hands-on experience that I have
been fortunate to acquire.  I have had the opportunity to personally buy
natural gas, develop gas gathering and processing plants, operate gas
plants, fractionators and storage facilities, develop gas and gas liquids
pipelines, market liquids, and even load trucks and tank cars!

I would be proud to be again associated with Enron.  I possess the
professional image, business principles, experience and record of
accomplishment required by Enron to effectively address the business
challenges it faces.  I would very much like to visit with you and your
associates in person to discuss my specific capabilities and qualifications.

Sincerely,

Steve Dickerson

Tel: (281) 597-8220


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Mid-Year 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s)
that have been identified for you.  Your feedback plays an important role in
the performance management process, and your participation is very critical
to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

Please provide feedback on the employee(s) listed below by accessing the
Performance Management System (PEP) and completing an online feedback form as
described in the "Performance Management Quick Reference Guide".  You may
begin your feedback input immediately.  Please have all feedback forms
completed by the date noted below.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please call the PEP Help Desk at the following numbers:

In the U.S.:  1-713-853-4777, Option 4
In Europe:  44-207-783-4040, Option 4
In Canada:  1-403-974-6724 (Canada employees only)

Or e-mail your questions to:  perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following list of employees is a CUMULATIVE list of all feedback
requests, by operating company, that have an "OPEN" feedback status.  An
employee's name will no longer appear once you have completed the feedback
form and select the "SUBMIT" button in PEP.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Jun 16, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
AHMAD, ANJAM                    DALE SURBEY                     May 22, 2000
CARSON, MARGARET M              JAMES D STEFFES                 May 26, 2000
CRENSHAW, SHIRLEY J             WINCENTY J. KAMINSKI            May 24, 2000
GHOSH, SOMA                     TIMOTHY DAVIES                  May 31, 2000
VERNON, CLAYTON J               VASANT SHANBHOGUE               May 26, 2000
YUAN, DING                      RICHARD L CARSON                Jun 02, 2000
ZIPTER, RUDI C                  THEODORE R MURPHY               May 25, 2000


FYI

Bill (Bradford) and I have a plan but the number is a bit higher than we thought.

L

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:33 PM
To:	Milnthorp, Rob
Subject:	non payments from today

Rob,

Let's discuss an action plan

Louise


Here is the link to the Redherring.com story done on EnronOnline.

http://www.redherring.com/industries/2000/0418/ind-enron041800.html

Meredith


Attached is a newly revised Credit Watch listing.  If there are any
personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please
insure that they receive a copy of this report.

To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.

For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, Brant Reves at x3-9897, or Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.


Dear Jeff,

Several weeks ago I sent you the draft of a chapter on you in my
forthcoming book
on great problem solvers.  By sending you a courtesy copy in advance of
publication, I wanted to give you a chance to help correct or update the
text and give me any comments to make sure I'm treating the subject fairly
in your mind.  My deadline is approaching, but I still haven't heard from
you or anyone in your organization.  Could you please let me know if you
plan to comment, or if there is anything I can do to make the process more
convenient.  I'm happy to speak to someone on the phone, for instance.

Thanks again for your participation and assistance,

Sincerely,

Christopher Hoenig
202-262-3166


I would like to take the following as vacation days:

Friday, April 21
Friday, May 26th

Please advise if there is a problem with taking these days.

Carol


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 09/07/2000 09:42
AM ---------------------------

"Nancy Pickover" <npickover@bracepatt.com> on 09/07/2000 11:16:15 AM
To: <jhartso@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>,
<snovose@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: fERC Agenda

I have been advised that FERC has determined that there is a potential
conflict beetween the Meeting in San Diego on the 12th and the Commission
meeting on the 13th.  They are deciding if one should be changed and if so
which one and when.  As soon as a decision is made they will issue
appropriate notices and the agenda.  I will keep you informed.


Karen,

Attached is the report on Sappi.

Also, I just received the email from Peggy on Weyerhaeuser.

Thanks,
Monika


What's it for?  When are you planning on submitting the cash request to the committee?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parks, Joe
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 3:40 PM
To:	Polsky, Phil
Subject:	Duke Field Services

I will try to pay Duke Field Services  $293543, ASAP


It is my understanding (from Kevin Hyatt) that its like Arizona's PUC.

-----Original Message-----
From: Howard, Kevin A.
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:47 PM
To: Donoho, Lindy
Subject: Power gen mkts slide

Pie chart slide for AZ,NM, and NEV shows the source of info to be thr "Arizona Corporation Commission". Who is this?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


I will be out of the office on Friday, October 19, 2001 and Monday, October 22, 2001. I will be checking voicemail during this time.


Shirley,

Please, register me.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001
07:25 AM ---------------------------

Lana Moore <Lana.Moore@nesanet.org> on 03/14/2001 04:10:46 PM
To: Nesa Members <NESAMembers@nesanet.org>
cc: Eva Pollard <Eva.Pollard@nesanet.org>, Teresa Knight
<Teresa.Knight@nesanet.org>, "'Todd Carroll'" <ToddCarroll@interim.com>
Subject: Complexity Science and the Energy Industry Brown Bag

 <<Complexity Science>>

PLEASE JOIN NESA/HEA AT THE "COMPLEXITY SCIENCE AND THE ENERGY INDUSTRY
BROWN BAG" ~ APRIL 18TH, 2001

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL LANA MOORE AT (713) 856-6525.

THANKS AND HAVE A GREAT DAY!!

 - E-Business.doc


Mike Swerzbin says this deal is good - he's got it in his trade log as
Natsource. ???

Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
01/10/2001 02:06 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: natsource

493987, is not there deal


Paul,

I enter the PR CPI as is and any resulting index, I let the decimal float.

Saludos,

Paul Y'Barbo@ENRON
02/07/2001 10:49 AM
To: Todd Peterson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jaime
Sanabria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roberto
Alvira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dustin Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Masters/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rick Sierra/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: 2001 Commodity/Demand Charges

Todd,

The attached calculations are using a Year 2000 PR-CPI of 180.525 (this is
not obvious because of formatting). The Cabot contract does not specify how
many decimal places to use. Do we have anything worked out with them
regarding rounding of the PR-CPI?

Paul

Todd Peterson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/07/2001 08:53 AM
To: Paul Y'Barbo
cc: Jamie Sanabria

Subject: 2001 Commodity/Demand Charges

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Todd Peterson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/07/2001 08:56 AM ---------------------------

Dustin Collins@ECT
02/01/2001 09:45 AM
To: Roberto Alvira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
Masters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd Peterson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: 2001 Commodity/Demand Charges

Now that I have received the December 2000 PR-CPI, I have completed
EcoElectrica's LNG pricing for 2001.  The attached model shows that Eco's
Commodity Charge to be $3.4831/MMBtu and the Demand Charge Rate to be
$0.8460/MMBtu.


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
 SUBSCRIBE YOURSELF OR YOUR FRIENDS TO JOKE OF THE DAY!
Receive a Free Gift with each subscription!
[IMAGE]

Unsubscribe by sending a blank mail to the unsubscribe address below:
entertainment3-unsubscribe-vince.j.kaminski=enron.com@andrew.freejokemail.c! om


From Bart to Duke and Chloe

CANINE HOLIDAY ETIQUETTE

(Submitted by a "Daily Inspiration" subscriber)

1. Be especially patient with your humans during this time. They may
appear to be more stressed-out than usual and they will appreciate long
comforting dog leans.

2. They may come home with large bags of things they call gifts. Do not
assume that all the gifts are yours.

3. Be tolerant if your humans put decorations on you. They seem to get
some special kind of pleasure out of seeing how you look with fake
antlers.

4. They may bring a large tree into the house and set it up in a prominent
place and cover it with lights and decorations. Bizarre as this may seem
to you, it is an important ritual for your humans, so there are some
things you need to know:

- don't go to the bathroom on the tree

- don't drink water in the container that holds the tree

- mind your tail when you are near the tree

- if there are packages under the tree, even ones that smell interesting
or that have your    name on them, don't rip them open

- don't chew on the cord that runs from the funny-looking hole in the wall
to the tree

5. Your humans may occasionally invite lots of strangers to come visit
during this season. These parties can be lots of fun, but they also call
for some discretion on your part:

- not all strangers appreciate kisses and leans

- don't eat off the buffet table

- beg for goodies subtly

- be pleasant, even if unknowing strangers sit on your sofa

- don't drink out of glasses that are left within your reach

6. Likewise, your humans may take you visiting. Here your manners will
also be important:

- observe all the rules in #4 for trees that may be in other people's

houses. (4a is particularly important)

- respect the territory of other animals that may live in the house

- tolerate children

- turn on your charm big time

7. A big man with a white beard and a very loud laugh may emerge from your
fireplace in the middle of the night.

DO NOT BITE HIM!!

God bless you! Have a great Christmas filled with God's goodness.


Revised Resolution Attached
 - Resolution Omni2.doc


HOw much does that cost?  I mayh run it through Tom's RC.

Laura Harder@ENRON
12/13/2000 08:46 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CQG

I had Daniel Queada request CQG for Stacey, and when I checked the status of
the request, it shows that it's pending.  After trading, and when you get a
second, can you go into the IT website and approve it?  Call me over if you
want me to show you how to do it.

Thanks,
Laura


Carr is hosting an enymex presentation at our office in New York this
Monday, May 7th from 2-4 PM. We are double checking our head count to make
sure that we will be ready for the people attending the presentation.
If you would, please reply to this email with a yes or a no to indicate
your intentions of attending this enymex presentation.
Thank you.

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Louise, given the number of declines, is there any latitude in moving up the Canadian Headcount. I believe we cut very deep on the 1st go round. Specifically, there is  a couple of analysts and one manager on the commercial side and on the non-commercial side we'd like to have at least one if not two admins for answering the phones (Admins are roughly U.S. $15K/annum and ours are extremely good). We still might come in under our initial headcount given the decline probabilities, but I would like to offer additional jobs asap as opposed to waiting for responses.


Kim,
 Please review and if okay please send out for signature.  Thank you.


Jeff:

Per our discussions, when Judge Pulsifer completes his new order granting
NDIEC authority to Enron (in the very near future) we are going to file
updated final tariffs.

As part of that process, the Commission needs to see per the Decision 8/3
sample "Forms" from Enron for things like a Disconnect Notice, Sample Bill
and New Service Orders.? If you can get your hands on such types of standard
EBS/ETI forms, we will attach them to the CPUC filings.

Also, you are still on to discuss interconnection agreements with Steve and
us tomorrow at 2:00.? Let me know if we need to rearrange at all and we'll
accomodate.

Jeremy Meier
Blumenfeld & Cohen


Attached is the fourth week of September Transwestern Weekly Report.  Please
call me at (281)647-0769 if you have any questions.


BLOOMBERG

Jeff Richter
deal 580280
Bloomberg does not recognize

Chris Mallory
I am missing the following deal  per Bloomberg:
Enron buys from El Paso 25 mw Q3'01 SP light at $228

deal 580168
Bloomberg shows fee of $.005

Mike Swerzbin
deal 580159
Bloomberg shows fee of $.005

PREBON
All deal are o.k.

Amerex West
All deals are o.k.


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron on 09/03/2001 06:34
PM ---------------------------

"Leon O'Bryan" <OBryan_Leon_L@solarturbines.com> on 08/31/2001 03:02:18 PM
To: <ruth.jensen@enron.com>
cc: <Rich.Jolly@enron.com>

Subject: Original Dates

Ruth,

The  following information is provided per your request,

I have also faxed you the Solar data sheets "sorted by original engine serial
number".

Engine serial #        original manufactured date

--30647-------------------------------10/10/75

--21168--------------------------------06/22/71

--20200--------------------------------08/31/66

--0457S21----------------------------03/24/81

--4223C41----------------------------01/19/89

If you have any questions or if I can be of further service please do not
hesitate to give me a call.

Leon O'Bryan
(801) 352-5100


Mark,

Great news about the deal. Can I please be provided with copies of the Dynegy documents? Senior management here, and elsewhere no doubt, have lots of questions about constraints on the business going forward, what could prevent merger taking place etc. etc. Is it planned that summaries of key provisions be prepared centrally and circulated?

Thanks.

						Mark

J. Mark Evans
Enron Europe Legal Department
tel: 44 207 783 5424
fax: 44 207 783 8287
email: mark.evans@enron.com
outlook: evans, mark (London Legal)


Yes, we can.  Others are considering doing the same.  Let's discuss on Monday.

	Leslie Lawner
	01/18/2001 01:18 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: FW: Emergency Petition of ORA and TURN for Modification of
Decisi  on and Resolution on A.92-12-043 et al.

Jeff, Can we oppose these changes?

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/18/2001 11:32 AM

		 To: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, MDay@GMSSR.com, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Emergency Petition of ORA and TURN for Modification of Decisi
on and Resolution on A.92-12-043 et al.

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/18/2001 11:31 AM -----

	"Cherry, Brian" <BKC7@pge.com>
	01/17/2001 11:35 AM

		 To: "'Dasovich, Jeff'" <jdasovic@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Emergency Petition of ORA and TURN for Modification of Decisi
on and Resolution on A.92-12-043 et al.

Jeff -  Thought you'd be interested.? Let's try for lunch next  week.
?
-----Original Message-----
From: Pocta, Robert M.  [mailto:rmp@cpuc.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 9:28  AM
To: Cherry, Brian
Subject: FW: Emergency Petition of ORA  and TURN for Modification of Decisi
on and Resolution on A.92-12-043 et  al.

??????? Brian - This is a  copy of an emergency petition to modify the gas
accord decision that was filed  yesterday.? It basically requests that
penalties to core customers for  diversions be waived and any diversion be
priced at the market price up to $50  per dth.? Unfortunately, we felt it had
to be filed because we couldn't let  the core be exposed to $100 per Dth gas
supply when PG&E can't buy at $10  per dth.? Hopefully, the crisis will be
resolved and petition will have no  bearing.?

??????? It was mailed to the  Gas Accord service list and our legal division
e-mailed to an unknown service  list which I had wished they hadn't done. (We
are not trying to add to any  problem, but based on a worst case scenario we
couldn't have the core exposed to  buying $100 per dth gas for all its gas
supply)???

?

?

 - CPUC01-#87842-v1-emergency_petition_on_A9212043_.doc


Jim,

IEP is seeking $15,000 more per company to be involved in its FERC/ISO
Committee (and have a say over what IEP does).  I try to get IEP to make
filings instead of Enron or to get them to bolster our posiiton.  I also use
WPTF this way and I use WPTF much more than I use IEP, which is pretty well
dominated by QFs and generators. I asked Dave Parquet if he would pay for
part of it.  Do you think we should continue to participate in this Committee
and could I get partial or complete funding through the RCR process?

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/22/2001 09:49 AM -----

	"Carol Hudson" <carol@iepa.com>
	05/21/2001 04:37 PM
	Please respond to carol

		 To: "Alan Comnes \(E-mail\)" <acomnes@enron.com>, "Bill Woods \(E-mail\)"
<billw@calpine.com>, "Bob Ellery \(E-mail\)" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Brian T.
Cragg \(E-mail\)" <bcragg@gmssr.com>, "Carolyn A Baker \(E-mail\)"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Curtis Hatton \(E-mail\)"
<curt.hatton@neg.pge.com>, "Curtis Kebler \(E-mail\)"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "David Parquet \(E-mail\)"
<david.parquet@enron.com>, "'Dean Nistetter'" <Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>,
"Duane Nelsen \(E-mail\)" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "Eric Eisenman \(E-mail\)"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "George Vaughn \(E-mail\)"
<gavaughn@duke-energy.com>, "Greg Blue \(E-mail\)" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Jack
Pigott \(E-mail\)" <jackp@calpine.com>, "'JoAnn Van Buren'"
<joann.vanburen@elpaso.com>, "Joe Ronan \(E-mail\)" <joer@calpine.com>, "John
G. Larrea \(E-mail\)" <john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "Ken Hoffman \(E-mail\)"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Kent Palmerton \(E-mail\)"
<kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Mark Fillinger \(E-mail\)"
<mark.fillinger@enron.com>, "Mark J. Smith \(E-mail\)"
<mark_J_smith@fpl.com>, "Marty McFadden \(E-mail\)"
<mmcfadden@covantaenergy.com>, "Nam Nguyen \(E-mail\)"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Paula Soos \(E-mail\)" <psoos@covantaenergy.com>,
"Rachel King \(E-mail\)" <rachel.king@elpaso.com>, "Randall J. Hickok
\(E-mail\)" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Roger Pelote \(E-mail\)"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Ross Ain \(E-mail\)" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"Scott Sadler \(E-mail\)" <sadlersa@earthlink.net>, "Steve Ponder \(E-mail\)"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steve Schleimer \(E-mail\)"
<sschleimer@calpine.com>, "Susan J Mara \(E-mail\)" <smara@enron.com>, "Tom
Hartman \(E-mail\)" <tom_hartman@fpl.com>, "Ward Scobee \(E-mail\)"
<wscobee@caithnessenergy.com>, "William Hall \(E-mail\)"
<wfhall2@duke-energy.com>
		 cc: "Carol Hudson \(E-mail\)" <carol@iepa.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones
\(E-mail\)" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Katie Kaplan \(E-mail\)" <kaplan@iepa.com>,
"Sandra Moseley \(E-mail\)" <sandra@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly \(E-mail\)"
<steven@iepa.com>
		 Subject: Participation in ISO/FERC Committee Decision Making Level

Please see attached letter and invoice regarding a new level of
participation in the ISO/FERC Committee.

Carol Hudson, Executive Assistant
Independent Energy Producers Assn.
1112 I Street, Suite 380
Sacramento, CA 95814
PH: 916-448-9499
FX: 916-448-0182
carol@iepa.com

 - ISO-FERC COMM Part letter.doc


Sara and Mark:

Please look over the attached product description and one of the index
descriptions and let me know if you have any comments.

I suggest revising the Financial Power Swap Product as follows:

A US Power financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under
which the Seller
pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price submitted by Counterparty
on the website
(the Fixed Price) in each case in respect of the Notional Quantity per
Determination Period.  Each
calendar month during the term of the Transaction or the term of the
Transaction if it is less than a month will be a Determination Period. The
Notional
Quantity per Determination Period shall be the volume for the relevant
Determination Period
(calculated using the volume submitted by Counterparty via EnronOnline). The
Payment Date(s)
will be 5 business days after the Floating Price is determinable. The
Floating Price shall be the
average of the Index for each day in the relevant Determination Period.

Leslie


Anadarko does not currently operate any power plants.  Primarily E&P and
related marketing functions (trade gas/crude/ngl's).  I have heard of a
project that is beginning that is looking into the prospects of trading
electricity.  How soon that may occur is simply a guess.  Obviously
there is a substantial amount of hedging activity related to the
gas/crud/ngl's.  You can always check the web site to see if there are
other areas you may be interested in.  Hope all works out well.  Send me
you resume if you wish.  Give me a call after Thanksgiving and we can
try to meet at Mollys/Papas one afternoon.  Phone numbers:
832-636-7045 (w)
281-298-7860 (h)
Keep in touch, ajt.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Forney, John M. [SMTP:John.M.Forney@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:10 PM
> To:	Allan Taylo (E-mail)
> Subject:	what's happening?
>
>
>
> AJ,
> Thanks for checking in with me.   I had a couple of questions:
> Does Anadarko have any power plants or do they trade gas/electricity
> actively?      I currently do several things:
> I am the Manager of the real time Power Trading desk.    I also manage
> the Ercot Asset book.   I trade around a combined cycle gas plant in
> south Texas.
> I am required to trade gas along with  the power in order to properly
> hedge the plant.
> I would be interested in continuing in this area.
>
> Thanks for anything you can tell me about working at Anadarko.   I
> could
> send my resume,  but if we dont have paralell needs,  then I wont
> bother.
> I have some other things that I am working on.
>
> Thanks again for asking.  This company will be fine,  but I have
> worked
> 12-14 hours/day for 8+ years.   When the stock price is $90, I can
> somewhat justify the hours and lack of life.   However,   although I
> am
> sure that Enron will bounce back,  I am no longer willing to sacrifice
> to make it so.
>
> I have been consistenly profitable in my time here.   I have never
> been
> on a losing team - we have always made major money for the company,
> so
> it is very hard to understand how this whole thing is unwinding.
>
> Anyway,  thanks again and I look forward to hearing from you.
>
> JMF
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
> sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution
> or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
> please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
> enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
> message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to
> be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding
> and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
> be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


Start Date: 10/22/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102223.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/22/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR


approved

LeRea Pharr@ECT
01/30/2001 04:28 PM
Sent by:	LeRea Pharr@ECT
To:	Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Class Request: PPT97-931 PowerPoint 97, Introduction,  Jan Moore

Your approval is required for Jan Moore to attend the following class.
To grant approval, send a reply to "lpharr@enron.com" (NotesMail: LeRea Pharr/HOU/ECT@ECT).
  Be sure to include employee's name and class number in reply.

PowerPoint 97, Introduction
Session Dates & Times:
  2/7/2001  8:30:00 AM-4:00:00 PM
Location: EB572
No Show/Participant Fee: $ 175.00

If you have any questions, please call the Technology Training Coordinator at 713-853-1816.


missing deal
trader?

call
buying tractebel
april
pv
250.00 strike
9.00 prem
25 mw


Sorry guys.  I'm still working on the February invoice to CES.  I estimate
that everyday this invoice does not get out cost Enron about $4,000 a day.
Feel free to call my boss Scott Neal about the problems you are having.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000 09:46
AM ---------------------------

Wade R Price
03/13/2000 09:33 AM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CES Pool Gas

John Singer told me these two producers' deals expired 12/31/99.  We will not
need these set up.

Producer   Pipe  Status

Burkland, Richard  CPA  Deal expired 12/31/99 No need to set up

Burkland, WIlliam S  CPA  Deal expired 12/31/99 No need to set up

What is the status on these producers ?  I have invoices and I need to pay
these ASAP, especially Questa (they are calling).

Questa Petroleum  CPA   Deal  213088 set up with meter number per 9911 pay
statement.  Production statement for volumes
      received from John Singer 3/8/00

Phoenix Dominion  CPA/Cipco Deal 142669  Producer invoice available for
information

T & F Operating  PennFuel Invoice in. Deal not set up. Not able to identify
which Penn Fuel (56 or 56W) on CGAS


To Sections E206-1 and E206-2:

This is just to confirm that, as discussed in class, there is the following
change in the syllabus and in the deadline for handing in the first
individual report:

1. The first individual report is now due on Wednesday, February 16 at 6pm
(for both sections). The previous deadline was February 9. This report is
the analysis of the case "EMI/CT Scanner (A) & (B)". We'll discuss the case
in class in the week of February 16.

2. On the week of February 9 (February 9 for Section 1 and February 10 for
section 2) we'll discuss in class the "Barco" case instead of the "EMI/CT
Scanner" case.

3. The lecture assignments for each class remain unchanged.

Miguel

J. Miguel Villas-Boas
Associate Professor
Haas School of Business
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley CA 94720-1900
(510) 642-1250
Fax: (510) 643-1420
e-mail: villas@haas.berkeley.edu

http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/~market/PROFILES/PROFS/villas.html


ATTENTION - ALL USERS OF THE INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE!

New Version 7.23 of The IntercontinentalExchange Goes Live
The IntercontinentalExchange is pleased to announce that on Monday, March 19,
2001, the new Version 7.23
of the exchange will go live. Version 7.23 includes many new features and
enhancements as follows:

ENHANCED COUNTERPARTY FILTERS
Daily Dollar Limits (Notional Value $US)
Credit Floor
Daily Dollar Override
Number of Counterparties
Email Notification

ORDER FUNCTIONALITY
Messaging and Chat Facility
Reserve Quantity
Surplus Posting
OCO's
Hold Bids/Hold Offers
Momentary Flash
"Pinned" Markets
Order Maintenance

DEAL FUNCTIONALITY
Deal Warning Limits
Deal Confirmation "Notes"
Deal Book Layout

SCREEN ENHANCEMENTS
Market Statistics
Ticker Filtering
Trading Clock
Check Your Connection
System Health Indicator
Number of Users Logged In

PORTFOLIO FUNCTIONALITY
Portfolio Construction
Edit Options and Columns
NON-STANDARD STRIPS
Custom Products
Notification

MULTI-COMPANY FUNCTIONALITY
Get All The Details
If you have questions about using the new features and functionality of
Version 7.23, please don't hesitate to
call your Account Representative, your Customer Service Representative, or
our 24-hour help desk at (800) 778-8464 /
(770) 738-2101. A complete explanation of the new features and functionality
of Version 7.23 can also be found in
the release notes available on the Intercontinental Exchange website.

To view and download the release notes,
1.      Go to http://www.intercontinentalexchange.com
2.      Click "Downloads" on the menu
3.      Enter your user I.D. and password at the prompt
4.      Click "Release Notes" on the menu
5.      Click "View Release Notes Here".
Note: The release notes are available in PDF file format. If you do not have
a PDF file reader installed on your computer,
you can download and install the Adobe Acrobat Reader for free from their
website
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep.html

Important! Installation Is Required
It is important that the new Version 7.23. be installed on your system.
Previous versions of the IntercontinentalExchange
software, such as 6.10 and 6.11, will no longer work after close of business
on Friday, March 16. If you are a trader or
user of the system, it is likely that your company IT contact is already
arranging the new installation for you. However,
if you have any questions or concerns about installing the new version,
please call your IntercontinentalExchange
Account Representative, your Customer Service Representative, or our 24-hour
help desk at (800) 778-8464 /
(770) 738-2101.


Mark/Holly,

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Vivian
5-3995


I am working on a Ski trip proposal for HPLC & ENA and would like for
everyone to think
about possible customers.    If the trip is approved, the trip will probably
occur on
  1.   Wednesday, Feb 28 - Saturday March 3rd
   or
  2.  Wednesday March 7th - Saturday, March 11th

Please let me know the number of customers each of you feel confident will
attend.  I am expecting to
be able to accommodate up to a total of 18-20 people (2 houses), including
Enron folks. I can commit to at least  5 and
up to 10 customers, if we happen to need that many.

Possible Enron Reps
 1.  Tom Martin
 2.   Lee Papayoti
 3.  Gary Lamphier
 4.  Greg Brazaitis
 5.  Brian Redmond
 6. Laurie Allen
 7. Janet Wallis
 8. James Mc Kay
 9. Have I missed anyone?

Let me know what your thinking ASAP, I would like to submit this for approval
on Friday the 15th.

Janet


A colleague has sent you this article from Fortune (http://www.fortune.com).
Reply to your colleague at george.kneisley@enron.com
I believe this is the article===
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
ENRON
Is Enron Overpriced?
It's in a bunch of complex businesses. Its financial statements are nearly
impenetrable. So why is Enron trading at such a huge multiple?
Bethany McLean
Mon Mar 05 00:00:00 EST 2001

In Hollywood parlance, the "It Girl" is someone who commands the  spotlight
at any given moment--you know, like Jennifer Lopez or Kate  Hudson. Wall
Street is a far less glitzy place, but there's still such a  thing as an "It
Stock." Right now, that title belongs to Enron, the  Houston energy giant.
While tech stocks were bombing at the box office  last year, fans couldn't
get enough of Enron, whose shares returned 89%.  By almost every measure, the
company turned in a virtuoso performance:  Earnings increased 25%, and
revenues more than doubled, to over $100  billion. Not surprisingly, the
critics are gushing. "Enron has built  unique and, in our view, extraordinary
franchises in several usiness  units in very large markets," says Goldman
Sachs analyst David Fleischer.

Along with "It" status come high multiples and high expectations. Enron  now
trades at roughly 55 times trailing earnings. That's more than 2 1/2  times
the multiple of a competitor like Duke Energy, more than twice  that of the
S?500, and about on a par with new-economy sex symbol  Cisco Systems. Enron
has an even higher opinion of itself. At a  late-January meeting with
analysts in Houston, the company declared that  it should be valued at $126 a
share, more than 50% above current levels.  "Enron has no shame in telling
you what it's worth," says one portfolio  manager, who describes such
gatherings as "revival meetings." Indeed,  First Call says that 13 of Enron's
18 analysts rate the stock a buy.

But for all the attention that's lavished on Enron, the company remains
largely impenetrable to outsiders, as even some of its admirers are  quick to
admit. Start with a pretty straightforward question: How  exactly does Enron
make its money? Details are hard to come by because  Enron keeps many of the
specifics confidential for what it terms  "competitive reasons." And the
numbers that Enron does present are often  extremely complicated. Even
quantitatively minded Wall Streeters who  scrutinize the company for a living
think so. "If you figure it out, let  me know," laughs credit analyst Todd
Shipman at S&P. "Do you have a  year?" asks Ralph Pellecchia, Fitch's credit
analyst, in response to the  same question.

To skeptics, the lack of clarity raises a red flag about Enron's pricey
stock. Even owners of the stock aren't uniformly sanguine. "I'm somewhat
afraid of it," admits one portfolio manager. And the inability to get  behind
the numbers combined with ever higher expectations for the  company may
increase the chance of a nasty surprise. "Enron is an  earnings-at-risk
story,'' says Chris Wolfe, the equity market strategist  at J.P. Morgan's
private bank, who despite his remark is an Enron fan.  "If it doesn't meet
earnings, [the stock] could implode."

What's clear is that Enron isn't the company it was a decade ago. In  1990
around 80% of its revenues came from the regulated gas-pipeline  business.
But Enron has been steadily selling off its old-economy iron  and steel
assets and expanding into new areas. In 2000, 95% of its  revenues and more
than 80% of its operating profits came from "wholesale  energy operations and
services." This business, which Enron pioneered,  is usually described in
vague, grandiose terms like the  "financialization of energy"--but also, more
simply, as "buying and  selling gas and electricity." In fact, Enron's view
is that it can  create a market for just about anything; as if to underscore
that point,  the company announced last year that it would begin trading
excess  broadband capacity.

But describing what Enron does isn't easy, because what it does is
mind-numbingly complex. CEO Jeff Skilling calls Enron a "logistics  company"
that ties together supply and demand for a given commodity and  figures out
the most cost-effective way to transport that commodity to  its destination.
Enron also uses derivatives, like swaps, options, and  forwards, to create
contracts for third parties and to hedge its  exposure to credit risks and
other variables. If you thought Enron was  just an energy company, have a
look at its SEC filings. In its 1999  annual report the company wrote that
"the use of financial instruments  by Enron's businesses may expose Enron to
market and credit risks  resulting from adverse changes in commodity and
equity prices, interest  rates, and foreign exchange rates."

Analyzing Enron can be deeply frustrating. "It's very difficult for us  on
Wall Street with as little information as we have," says Fleischer,  who is a
big bull. (The same is true for Enron's competitors, but  "wholesale
operations" are usually a smaller part of their business, and  they trade at
far lower multiples.) "Enron is a big black box," gripes  another analyst.
Without having access to each and every one of Enron's  contracts and its
minute-by-minute activities, there isn't any way to  independently answer
critical questions about the company. For instance,  many Wall Streeters
believe that the current volatility in gas and power  markets is boosting
Enron's profits, but there is no way to know for  sure. "The ability to
develop a somewhat predictable model of this  business for the future is
mostly an exercise in futility," wrote Bear  Stearns analyst Robert Winters
in a recent report.
?

http://www.fortune.com/indexw.jhtml?channel=artcol.jhtml&doc_id=200625

Colleague at Fortune
http://www.fortune.com


Susan:
Could you please when you return on Monday circulate a list of issues that we
need to discuss regarding the forms?  Susan Flynn was keeping track of some
of those issues after you left.   I would like to try to get those issues
addressed next week with the people that we need to talk to so that we can
turn a draft of the ISDA Schedules, so please make this a priority.  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)


This is the final list for February 2000 for counterparty name changes and
mergers.

Name Overlay Only   -
The counterparty name will be overlaid with the new name on Tuesday (2/29)
afternoon.

To be Inactivated 3/1/00 -
Records to be inactivated will be done 3/1/00. If this is an issue for
anyone, please call me right away to discuss.

All documentation will be copied and forwarded as usual.

Thanks! MC


I know you're in high demand these last remaining days, but if you don't already have lunch plans, Vance and I would love to take you to lunch tomorrow.  Let me know.  kd


one quick comment on the gnty, it terminates on May 20,2002 and that
will be a little shy of the 180 days we need.  Please let me know if
fixing this is a problem. Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Nemec, Gerald [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Williams, Stephen
Subject: FW: Final Docs.

Resending.  Thanks.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Nemec, Gerald
> Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:08 PM
> To:	'swilliams@reliantenergy.com'
> Cc:	Mrha, Jean; 'kbradley@reliantenergy.com'
> Subject:	Final Docs.
>
> Attached are the documents we discussed.  I have a attached a clean
> and redline version of the Act of Sale, compared against the prior
> version we sent.  Upon your final approval, we will prepare
> executables.
>
>  <<Act of Sale - Clean Draft 5- Reliant(redline).DOC>>  <<Act of Sale
> - Clean Draft 5- Reliant.DOC>>  <<Post closing Survey Price
> Adjustment.doc>>  <<boardresolution02.doc>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Gina, I will leave this to your discretion.  I agree that the OD&T people
could help us in the communication/training side of any changes that are
made.  Comp. probably will not be affected much, since Needs Improvement and
Issues both are no bonus/no merit categories.  Thanks.  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 03:29
PM ---------------------------

Andrea Yowman@ENRON
08/27/2000 09:48 AM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Potential Change of Cluster Descriptors for PRC Reviews

Thanks Michelle.
One question:  Since this issue surrounds compensation and OD&T, have we
considered a compensation and OD&T person to participate in this review?  I
would recommend the leaders of the appropriate councils be involved.

Michelle Cash@ECT
08/25/2000 10:22 AM
To: Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Potential Change of Cluster Descriptors for PRC Reviews

Andrea,

You are right.  I remember that you wanted to be included, but somehow, as I
was trying to get away for vacation, I failed to remember to tell Twanda, who
was setting up the meeting.  I apologize for the oversight -- it was not
intentional.  I will make sure that you are included in any subsequent
meetings.  I am sorry about this one.

Basically, the discussion revolved around the purpose of the PRC -- is it a
compensation system or a feedback system?  Because the process tries to
address both, there is a tension between the organization's interests (comp,
promotion, etc) and that of the employee (feedback, development, etc.)  This
tension is really reflected by the current categories and descriptors and the
fact that we have a comparative rating system.  This tension has given people
lots of heartburn.

To address this tension and to provide an immediate tweak that doesn't create
too much change, Gina is going to draft new descriptors that reflect that
comparative nature and also that reflect a more consistent view of how we
evaluate employees.  The preference was to go to numbered categories instead
of a descriptor because of the possible disconnect between the descriptor and
the comparative rating.  For example, a "strong" performer really could be
excellent, but compared to others in the group, ended up in the third
category.  For this reason, the descriptor identifiers were found to be
problematic.  Also, there will be a revamping of the explanations of the
categories to get away from the old "HR" language.  For example, a category 1
performer would have a descriptor that said something like:  "Always raises
the bar; franchise player," etc. rather than a "HR" definition relating to
demonstrating criteria.  Also, people had the view that needs improvement and
issues probably should be collapsed because there wasn't much difference
between the two.

There was a general discussion about whether going to numbers made it seem
more competitive.  Also, there was discussion about the fact that the PRC
appeared to be a "black box," and the desire to explain and communicate more
about the process.

This was only the first meeting.  I will make sure that you are invited to
attend any subsequent ones, and I apologize for the first one.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Michelle

Andrea Yowman@ENRON
08/25/2000 06:13 AM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Potential Change of Cluster Descriptors for PRC Reviews

Michelle,
I had previously asked to be involved in this meeting but do not recall
getting a invitation.  Would you please send me a copy of the details of this
meeting?  Are there any other follow-up meetings scheduled?

Gina Corteselli
08/24/2000 05:28 PM
To: Candi Stanley/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Berghout/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Potential Change of Cluster Descriptors for PRC Reviews

As I noted, I attended a meeting yesterday to discuss the possibility of
changing the current descriptors used in PRC (Superior through Issues) to a
numeric rating 1-6 (or possibly 1-5 by combining the Needs Improvement and
Issues categories).  The numeric ratings would be based on more relative
behavioral descriptors to categorize an employee's performance, and not the
absolute standards that the current descriptors represent.

I have been tasked with drafting the verbiage for this possible change which
will, of course, require review and approval by the senior levels of the
organization.  In the interim I would appreciate knowing how this change
might affect the system and current development  and compatibility of the
data from mid-year to year end, assuming the change is approved.

I look forward to your comments and input.  Thanks in advance,

Gina


=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and
destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - Campbell.v.SDGE.PDF


Combined post id is 977346 - it's calc'd against tonite's curve.


I have asked Wilson Barbee t9o see if he can provide any assistance to you.
I do hope you find something that meets your qualifications.

Thanks for keeping me updated.

Stan


Hi Mark,

thanks for your support!!

Kind Regards,
Klaus
---------------------- Weitergeleitet von Klaus Holtel/DEVELOP/TWT/DE am
23.05.2002 18:23 ---------------------------

Mark Fisher@ENRON
23.05.2002 17:51
An: Klaus Holtel/DEVELOP/TWT/DE@TWTDE
Kopie: Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron@ENRON
Thema: Re: Antwort: Reqested Texas Data

Klaus,

Time stamp information is in the DTTM column. You will need to reformat the
column to display it.

Mark

Klaus Holtel@TWTDE
05/23/2002 08:54 AM
To: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Antwort: Reqested Texas Data

Hi Mark,

Thanks for the data, but I'am missing the timestamp information in both
XLS-files. Can you support me also (if possible today) with this timestamp
information?

Klaus

Mark Fisher@ENRON
23.05.2002 17:26
An: Klaus Holtel/DEVELOP/TWT/DE@TWTDE
Kopie: Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON
Thema: Reqested Texas Data

Klaus,

The 10-minute data for both sites is in the zipped file attached below. The
starting times are either end of last year of the beginning of this year. In
addition there are some gaps in the data. I hope that this will provide what
you need.

Mark Fisher


I have a friend who is possibly interested in the trading positions that we
have open, but I wanted to find out exactly what types of trading positions
they are.  CAn you give me some more details?  thanks.


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000 10:37 AM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	09/01/2000 01:13 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EE&CC Litigation Requirements

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 09/01/2000 01:13 PM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	07/13/2000 12:39 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EE&CC Litigation Requirements

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 12:39 PM -----

	Bob Hillier@ENRON
	05/25/2000 06:32 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EE&CC Litigation Requirements

Richard, could you provide me with some information on where we are with the
retention policy?  My last understanding from you was you were going to work
on the wording a bit and then get back with me.  As you can see below we are
at risk from a legal perspective on these cases until we get this policy in
place.

bbh
----- Forwarded by Bob Hillier/NA/Enron on 05/25/2000 06:30 AM -----

	Chris Behney@ECT
	05/24/2000 02:56 PM

		 To: Bob Hillier/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: EE&CC Litigation Requirements

Here is yet another request for e-mail from a long time ago.  Apparently EI
has these old tapes somewhere (at least Roberto and the users think they
do).  Any word from Richard Sanders?

CB

----- Forwarded by Chris Behney/HOU/ECT on 05/24/2000 02:33 PM -----

	Roberto Deleon@ENRON
	05/24/2000 01:55 PM

		 To: Chris Behney/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Henry Moreno/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gail
Brownfeld/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: EE&CC Litigation Requirements

Chris,

Gail Brownfeld (Senior Counsel) has required that all EE&CC back up mail
files be reviewed and any information pertaining to the following files be
reproduced for the upcoming EE&CC litigation efforts.

1.  Any messages TO or FROM the following people that have the "extension"
@bv.com for the time period 1992 to date.

 Jim Leblanc
 Karl Breckon
 Ricky Simon
 Frank Hosak
 Larry Snyder
 Ray McPhail
 Bill Fox
 John O'Hearn

2.  Also, the following people from Black & Veatch worked in the EECC Houston
office in 1995 and had Enron mail accounts.  Therefore we would need ANY
email to/from these accounts:

 Eric Odenhouse
 Gary Townsend
 Robert Wood
 Bruce Godsey
 John Kruse

Ms. Brownfeld indicated that the document review by Enron's outside counsel
has a six week window.  This is week two of those six week.  Therefore, it
has been requested that this task receive top priority.

Please let me know if you have any questions or require addtional information.

Regards
Roberto DeLeon


$4.26 by $4.28


Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

Morning Market View(TM) for Wednesday, May 16, 2001
as of 11:00AM EDT
Information provided by Standard & Poor's

================================================================

U.S. INDICES
(11:00a.m. EDT)

----------------------------------
Market            Value     Change

DJIA          10,927.00    + 54.10
Nasdaq Comp.   2,094.63     + 9.05
S&P 500        1,254.26     + 4.82
----------------------------------
NYSE Advancing Issues        1,422
NYSE Declining Issues        1,242
NYSE Trading Volume        260 mln
NASDAQ Advancing Issues      1,405
NASDAQ Declining Issues      1,627
NASDAQ Trading Volume      472 mln

==================================

U.S. TREASURIES
----------------------------------
Value            Yield      Change

1-year bill       3.66%        n/a
5-year note       4.94%     + 2/32
10-year note      5.46%     + 9/32
30-year bond      5.84%    + 26/32

The tables above look best when viewed in a fixed-width font,
such as "Courier."

================================================================

U.S. TRADING SUMMARY

After a shaky open, the headline U.S. indexes have been able to
overcome initial weakness and move into positive territory.
Stocks were under pressure at the open of regular trading as an
earnings warning from chip-equipment giant Applied Materials
weighed while another warning from phone titan Sprint also
impacted. Even a lighter-than-expected headline Consumer Price
Index figure, a key measure of inflationary pressure, could not
help the technology sector find a bid initially. Traders remained
steadfastly concerned about the health of upcoming corporate
profits, with the news from Applied Materials only fanning their
growing fears that the worst is not yet over. However, bargain
hunters came in and propped up the sagging indexes. By midmorning
all indices were in the green with the Dow up 0.50%, Nasdaq up
0.43% and the S&P 500 up 0.38%.

----------------------------------------------------------------

JAPAN / EUROPE SUMMARY

European equities were all lower in midafternoon European trading
as an earnings warning from U.S. firm Applied Materials added
pressure. The French CAC-40 has lost 1.1% while the German Dax
and London FTSE have fallen 0.8%. Elsewhere, Japanese shares were
crushed as the global weakness in technology and
telecommunications shares spread like a contagion. The Nikkei-225
was hammered for a 2.6% loss while the broader Topix dumped 1.6%
of its value. Furthermore, the Federal Reserve's reiteration of
weakness in the U.S. economy, which was in the statement
accompanying Tuesday's rate decision, added pressure to Japanese
and European equities overnight.

----------------------------------------------------------------

CURRENCY SUMMARY

The dollar has fallen to its lowest level in about a week against
the euro, as traders took another look at the Federal Reserve's
statement yesterday and found that they did not like the
implication that conditions in the U.S. economy remain on the
weak side. The pair is trading around 0.884 dollars per euro from
around 0.876 dollars overnight. The dollar surged higher against
the yen overnight, trading to 124 yen as weakness in Japanese
stocks weighed on the yen. However, profit-taking has pulled the
greenback off its overnight highs and it is now trading around
123.4 yen.

----------------------------------------------------------------

MAJOR COMPANY / INDUSTRY NEWS
(All prices as of 11:05 a.m. EDT)

** Applied Materials (AMAT: 50.17, + 0.28) reported fiscal
second-quarter profits that were at the low end of expectations.
The firm also warned that fiscal third-quarter profits would be
well below current expectations. Applied Materials revealed that
it earned $269 million, or $0.32 per share, excluding a
restructuring charge. Earnings were expected to hit between $0.32
and $0.37 per share, according to the First Call survey. In the
same quarter last year, Applied Materials earned $0.53 per share.
For the upcoming third quarter, the company expects earnings per
share to break even or come in just slightly above breakeven
levels. The forecast represents a dramatic divergence from
analysts' expectations, which were for the firm to earn a profit
of $0.22 per share according to First Call.

** Sprint (FON: 21.07, - 0.51) downgraded its fiscal
second-quarter earnings guidance, along with its full-year 2001
profit estimates, due to the impact of bad debts and lower
demand. The phone giant now expects earnings at its core FON
division to hit between $4.3 billion and $4.4 billion for all of
2001. Earnings per share for the second quarter are expected in
the $0.28 to $0.30 range, compared with the results from the
First Call survey that had the average analyst estimate pegged at
$0.32 per share. Note that Sprint excluded its Sprint PCS (PCS:
23.83, - 0.17) wireless division from this guidance.

** Brocade Communications (BRCD: 44.45, + 1.95), a major supplier
of fiber optic switches, reported second-quarter earnings that
were in line with already-lowered profit projections. The company
said that it made $12.0 million, or $0.05 per share, versus $13.3
million, or $0.06 per share, in the same quarter last year.
Revenues rose 86% to $115.2 million.

----------------------------------------------------------------

ECONOMIC NEWS

** Consumer Price Index for April rose 0.3%, following the
previous 0.1% increase. The S&P MMS consensus estimate called for
a 0.4% rise.

** Housing starts for April were at the 1.61 million unit pace,
compared to the previous 1.59 million unit pace. The consensus
estimate was for a 1.60 million unit pace.

** THURSDAY - Weekly initial jobless claims, May Philadelphia
Federal Reserve index, April leading economic indicators.

** FRIDAY - March U.S. trade report, April Treasury budget.

################################################################

Log in using the links below to:

Access your account:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=CCBodyi&NeedCASelValue=Y

View your Email Alert customization options:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

Perform research or request a market quote:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=Quotes

Place a trade order:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=TradeStock

To visit Schwab's home page, use this link:
http://www.schwab.com/

-----------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe or modify your Email Alert customization options,
log in using the link below or copy and paste it into your
browser's address window:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

Now you can receive graphics Email Alerts in HTML format,
using helpful, full-color graphics and active Web links that
connect you directly to information you want. Use the link
below to log in and change your email format preference:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAEditEmailAddr

----------------------------------------------------------------

Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
email system may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed
by Schwab personnel. (1000-8752)

Copyright 2001 Standard & Poor's MMS Inc.  All rights reserved.
Standard & Poor's MMS services are for personal use only.
Commercial use or redistribution in any form, print or
electronic, is prohibited.
Distribution by Quris, Inc.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2001 08:54 AM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/06/2001 05:42 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-06-01

Please see attached.


US Post Office
                         10800 Gosling RD
                         Spring, TX 77381-3750
                         Phone: 281-298-9290


Tana -

Peter's message below contains a form of NDA that was provided to New World
by both EBS and Enron Puerto Rico.  While I realize they are not Net Works,
if this form is acceptable, do we have to have special approval from ENW
management to use a different form?  Let me know because I have no problem
with the attached form and need to finalize this for Peter.

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 03/23/2001 12:36 PM -----

	Peter Feltman/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/13/2001 05:22 PM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Mathis Conner/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: FW: New World Network/Enron Net Works NDA

Mark:

Attached for your review and comment please find New World Network's comments
to our initial draft of the NDA.

Please provide me with your response as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Peter Feltman

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Louis Giordano" <lgiordano@nwncable.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Louis+20Giordano+22+20+3Clgiordano+40nwncable+2Ecom+3E+4
0ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 5:03 PM
To: Feltman, Peter
Subject: FW: New World Network/Enron Net Works NDA

Peter,

As we discussed.

Lou

-----Original Message-----
From: svadasz [mailto:svadasz@nwncable.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 4:51 PM
To: Louis Giordano
Cc: David M Martin
Subject: RE: New World Network/Enron Net Works NDA

Lou,

Attached is the requested NDA with Enron Networks.  I added in the business
purpose regarding the Online Website.  This is form of the Enron NDAs
negotiated with Enron Broadband Services and Enron Puerto Rico.  This form
is different from the form Enron Net Works sent you as referenced below.  In
order to keep our NDAs consistent, David thought it would be best to stick
with one form agreement.  This form was the one sent to us by the other 2
Enrons - not our form.

Stephanie Vadasz
New World Network USA, Inc.
2977 McFarlane Road, Suite 300
Coconut Grove, Florida 33133
Phone: 305-569-2356
Fax: 305-529-8701
Email: svadasz@nwncable.com

This communication contains information which is confidential and may be
protected by attorney/client or other applicable privileges.  It is for the
exclusive use of the intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended
recipient(s), please note that any distribution, copying or use of this
communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately
at svadasz@nwncable.com and destroy any copies of it.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Martin [mailto:dmartin@nwncable.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 3:40 PM
To: svadasz@nwncable.com
Subject: FW: New World Network/Enron Net Works NDA

Per Lou
-----Original Message-----
From: Louis Giordano [mailto:lgiordano@nwncable.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 3:27 PM
To: dmartin@nwncable.com
Subject: FW: New World Network/Enron Net Works NDA

David, I will explain.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter.Feltman@enron.com [mailto:Peter.Feltman@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 6:42 PM
To: lgiordano@nwncable.com
Cc: Mathis.Conner@enron.com; Mark.Greenberg@enron.com;
Tana.Jones@enron.com
Subject: New World Network/Enron Net Works NDA

Lou,

Per our conversation earlier today, attached for your review and comment
please find an initial draft of an NDA between New World Network and Enron
Net Works.

Please forward any questions or comments to the attached to Enron in-house
counsel, Mark Greenberg (Telephone - 713-345-8897).

Please call me at 713-345-4482 if you have any other additional questions.

Best regards,

Peter Feltman

(See attached file: New World Network NDA.doc)

 - NWN Enron Net Works NDA.doc


Justin

Our understanding is that FX traded from the US is effectively unregulated.
If we use MG London Inc, there would be the possibility that the CFTC would
have some type of oversight on the unregulated business. Only the posting of
the IMM EFPs needs to be done through the FCM.

There are other practical issues here in that that MG London Inc currently
lacks the infrastructure needed to do the outright FX business as it has no
bank FX lines and no bank accounts for all the currencies. There are other
issues where the main settlements/back office expertise is here in London.
These are obviously not insurmountable but we need to do a lot of work to get
either MG London Inc or, for example, MG Newco Inc ready for the business. Is
there an angle for using Enron North America, for example, as I understand
they already have existing FX lines and settlements or would that be a
non-starter? There are currently some UK and EU customers on Wolff's books
who would need to be routed via an SFA regulated arranger. Will we be able to
use EEFT for this?

Rgds

Jon

Justin Boyd@ECT
09/08/2000 18:54
To: Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD
cc: Trena McFarland/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: FX Transactions

Jon,

I had a glance over the written paper from Sullivan & Cromwell as to FX
Transactions, and it seems to me that there would be fewer US regulatory
issues (should there be any), if we were to use MG Brokers Inc, the FCM
entity.  Are there any other reasons why we would not want to use this entity?

[Mark/Alan/Marcus - I have separately sent you by email the Sullivan &
Cromwell paper]

Thanks.
Justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 09/08/2000 18:49
---------------------------

Jon Barrett@MGLTD
09/08/2000 16:37
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Trena McFarland/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin Rhodes/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Sid
Tipples/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: FX Transactions

---------------------- Forwarded by Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD on
09/08/2000 16:36 ---------------------------
From: Alfred Pennisi@MGUSA on 09/08/2000 06:50 EDT
To: Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD
cc:

Subject: Re: FX Transactions

Jon,

My suggestion would be for the FX business be run out of a NON FCM firm in
the states (NY) since it is a non-regulated product.

If you have an questions please call me at x5845.

regards,

Alfred Pennisi
MG London Inc.
520 Madison Avenue
28th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212.715.5845
E-mail: alfred.pennisi@mglondon.com


Gerald:

I am still awaiting your review of the proposed changes to the Purchase
and Sale Agreement sent to you earlier.  Please contact me so that I may
prepare the final document.

Keith


<<2000-DJ-NP-INDEXES-HIST.xls>>  <<2000-DJ-SP-INDEXES-HIST.xls>>

 - 2000-DJ-NP-INDEXES-HIST.xls
 - 2000-DJ-SP-INDEXES-HIST.xls


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	John-1/2 day Vaction

Date:		4/26/2001
Time:		5:00 PM - 6:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Somebody should check Drewlo's clothes for paint thinner.

CD


Done

DG

Tricia Truong
12/20/2000 06:29 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enervest S# 27239

Hi Daron,
Could you please change rate on the above Sitara to $4.15544 for Nov. 00
Production ?
Thanks for your help,
T  3-9852


I am pleased to announce that a new feature is being added to the E-Tag system: the Potential Adjust List (PAL).

As you may or may not know, there is currently an "Adjust List" that is issued when TLRs are called. An "Adjust List" is a recommendation from the IDC that describes what transactions should be cut and by how much to achieve needed relief to eliminate a constraint.  This Adjust List sent out to Generation and Load Control Areas and Tag Authors for all transactions that are being recommended for curtailment.  It is intended to aid in coordination Control Area schedules during curtailment, as well as alert the marketplace of recommendations for their transactions to be curtailed. Under the current process, the Adjust List notice is sent out when the initiating Security Coordinator and all impacted Security Coordinators have agreed to recommend specific curtailments.  As such, this recommendation can occur very late, leaving very little time for the market to react (i.e., resource and/or resink their power).

The Potential Adjust List feature adds a second, earlier Adjust List that is sent out when the initiating SC requests relief, but prior to the confirmation of all the impacting SCs.  This should allow this recommendation to be delivered several minutes sooner than it is today, giving more time for the market to begin searching for alternate economic sources and sinks.  When all impacted SCs confirm, the standard Adjust List recommendation is sent out as it is today.

It should be recognized that both the Potential Adjust List and the standard Adjust List do not represent actual curtailments - in both cases, they are only recommendations for curtailment.  Control Areas may elect to curtail different transactions or amounts than reflected in either Adjust List due to local relief procedures or other business practices.  However, both lists should aid in mitigating risk associated with physical transactions and curtailments.  Further, empirical evidence seems to indicate that in the majority of cases, the Potential Adjust List, standard Adjust List, and final curtailments will be very close.

This change is based a proposal I wrote with the help and support of Jim Eckelkamp (Carolina Power and Light), Mark Scheel (Dynegy), and Patt Terris (Exelon Power Team).   If you talk to any of them during the course of daily business, please thank them for their support of this effort.  With their assistance in developing the concept, ironing out the technical details, and cultivating NERC support in the various forums,  we were able to implement this change very quickly.

I expect this change to take place sometime between June 15 and June 28.  Attached, please find a message from NERC that describes the feature and how it works.  If you would like more detail, please let me know.  I currently Chair the group that is responsible for improving E-Tag, and as such, am intimately familiar with tagging and its functions.

In the next few weeks, I will be working with Don Baughman and Juan Hernandez to ensure we utilize this feature (and others) to maximize the value of our E-Tagging tools.  As indicated above, please feel free to contact me with any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Senior Regulatory Specialist - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Monica Mulryan" <Monica.Mulryan@nerc.net>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Monica+20Mulryan+22+20+3CMonica+2EMulryan+40nerc+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 7:43 AM
To:	Monica Mulryan
Subject:	New E-Tag Feature:  Potential Adjust List

TO:	NERC ROSTER
	STANDARDS LIST SERVER GROUP
	OPERATING MANUAL OWNERS
	SYSTEM OPERATOR TRAINERS

Just in case you did not received this on May 25, 2001, we are sending
it again.  If this is a duplicate e-mail, we apologize for any
inconvenience.  Please note however that the phone number for the NERC
Help Desk has been changed to 609-452-1661.

Regards,

Monica Mulryan
Secretary-Operations

 <<Letter-E-Tag PAL 52501.pdf>>
 - Letter-E-Tag PAL 52501.pdf


TJ,

Thanks for the congratulatory message you left on our voicemail - it made us
feel great.
We actually didn't go on a honeymoon - we will take one sometime next year.
We've just
been swamped with the house we recently bought.  We bought an old small
bungalow
in the city.  What a money pit.  Hope everything is going great.  Tell
everyone we said
hi.

Thanks again,

Kevin


----- Original Message -----
From: mark.lay@solutioncompany.com
To: Robert  "Beau" Herrold  ; Linda Lay
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 6:39 AM
Subject: Take it to them
Last night, I opened up my Bible and found myself reading about  King
Hezekiah.  The bullet points are these:
1.  Hezekiah was  the most Godly man,
5 He trusted in Jehovah, the God of Israel; so that after  him was none like
him among all the kings of Judah, nor among them that were  before him.
  2 Kings 18:5 (ASV)
2.  The Assyrians surrounded  his city with a great army.
3.  He went to God with great faith and  honored God.
4.  God sent an angel
35 And it came to pass that night,  that the angel of Jehovah went forth, and
smote in the camp of the Assyrians  a hundred fourscore and five thousand:
and when men arose early in the  morning, behold, these were all dead bodies.
  2 Kings 19:35  (ASV)
I don't know if he intervenes like this in corporate affairs, but  if we seek
His guidance, how can we lose.  Take care of  yourselves.
Love,
Mark
P.S. If you think this would help Dad,  please send it to him.
Mark Lay
713-552-9518
CONFIDENTIALITY  STATEMENT:
This information is intended only for the use of the individual  or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that  is
confidential under applicable law.  If you are not the intended  recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this information  is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this information in error,  please
notify us immediately by telephone at (713) 552-9518 or by fax at  (713)
552-9403, and confirm that you have destroyed this information and  any
copies.
Thank you.


Here is the 2000 11 Final Flash Report.  Let me konw if there are any
questions.

Thank you!
Amy
ext 39741


I am trying to organize everybody's turret so that we have all of the Texas
Desk people on one page.  This will be especially beneficial for when we have
people out.  The phone guys are going to completely wipe out what you
curretnly have on Page 6, so if there is anything other than Texas Desk
employees, let me know so that they don't get deleted.

I would also like to reserve some space on Page7 for the rollover lines, so
ditto with Page 7 as with Page 6.

Let's put a deadline of December 1st for this .... that should be enough time
for you busy people to let me know if there's a problem.  I'd like to have
this done on December 4th.

Thanks,
Laura


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude41.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas41.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil41.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded41.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG41.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG41.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL41.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Eldon apologizes for not being able to send the picks out - something was
wrong with his server and I was too lazy to come over to my office to do it!

Anyway - here are the picks.? We are still missing WAM's which may be a
function of the cyber problems.

The results will be:? (what happened to the female side of things this week
any way??)

If Minnesota:
Dave
Eldon
Steve
Hank

If Green Bay:
Steve
Eldon
Dave
Hank

 <<week 10 B4 Monday.xls>> ???

 - week 10 B4 Monday.xls


Thanks.  Sorry for the latest. Was on the road this morning.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael.Alexander@sce.com [mailto:Michael.Alexander@sce.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:30 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: I. 99-07-003 Draft Comments on the Revised Proposed
Decision

Jeff,

In general, I agree with you that absent market power price caps are bad
policy.  In this case, I believe we have crafted the settlement (and the
decision reinforces those sections, in fact, the reduction of market
concentration limits from 40% to 30% goes even further in this regard), so
that market power will not be a problem.  I have phoned Mike Day and
suggested that he craft his comments to include the caveat about market
power, and he indicated that would not be a problem.  With that change I
don't think we object to including the comments on price caps.  I am still
getting approval from the various powers that be, but hope to get that
soon.

Michael

--
Michael S. Alexander
Southern California Edison
Energy Supply and Management (ES&M)
626-302-2029
626-302-3254 (fax)

                    "Dasovich,
                    Jeff"                  To:     "MDay" <MDay@GMSSR.com>, "Amirault, Paul"
                    <Jeff.Dasovich@        <PaulAmirault@aec.ca>, "Jeff Dasovich  Enron SF"
                    enron.com>             <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Michael Alexander, SCE"
                                           <ALEXANMS@sce.com>, "Phil Davies, WGSI Calgary"
                    10/18/2001             <PhilDavies@aec.ca>, "Porter, Douglas K"
                    08:17 PM               <PORTERDK@sce.com>, "Hass, Glen"
                                           <Glen.Hass@enron.com>, "Steffes, James D."
                                           <James.D.Steffes@enron.com>, "Mara, Susan"
                                           <Susan.J.Mara@enron.com>
                                           cc:
                                           Subject:     RE: I. 99-07-003  Draft Comments on
                                           the Revised Proposed Decision

Mike:  Comments looks good.  My only comment is that, in our view, the
price cap (which would cover ALL capacity in the secondary market) is
simply bad economic policy and won't address any problems--in fact it
will only create problems. (From a practical perspective, I'm not even
sure that the Commission can successfully "regulate" prices in the
secondary market.)

Will the commission change the price cap provisions of the decision
based comments advising against them?  Very unlikely.

But when the caps create problems (and they will), I want to have been
on record advising the Commission of why caps are bad economic policy
and pointing out the bad outcomes that caps will cause.  I think that
it's very important to point out the downside of caps and to be on
record against them.

That said, I don't want the comments to be so negative as to cloud
support for the decision; nor do I think the Commission will change the
cap based on our comments.  Other than that, EES and ENA can sign on.
Anyone have any objections to pointing out the fact that price caps are
ill-advised?

Best,
Jeff

           -----Original Message-----
           From: MDay
           Sent: Thu 10/18/2001 8:43 PM
           To: 'Amirault, Paul'; 'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'; 'Michael
Alexander, SCE'; 'Phil Davies, WGSI Calgary'; 'Porter, Douglas K'
           Cc:
           Subject: I. 99-07-003 Draft Comments on the Revised Proposed
Decision

            <<X28621.DOC>>

           Enclosed for your review are the draft comments on the Revised
Proposed
           Decision in the Gas Restructuring Investigation.  WGSI and Enron
have
           indicated a desire to file supportive comments.  Edison has
indicated an
           interest in reviewing our draft for the purpose of considering
joining in
           our comments.  Please send edited electronic versions with
underline and
           strikeout to MBD at this address no later than noon tomorrow.
These comments
           must be filed tomorrow before 5 pm.  I am sorry for the lateness
of the
           draft, but these are not extensive comments.  Except for the
little
           bombshell about extending commission jurisdiction over gas
marketers, I see
           little in the RPD to warrant our opposition.  Even if the
Commission
           proceeds with the jurisdictional grab, I believe it can be
overturned by the
           Court of Appeals.

           I look forward to your comments.

           Mike Day

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


FYI.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	owner-pjm-customer-info@pjm.com@ENRON   On Behalf Of PJMCustomerRelationsandTraining@pjm.com
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:04 AM
To:	pjm-customer-info@risc1.pjm.com
Subject:	News release: PJM, MISO Planning Joint and Common Wholesale Energ	y Market

Message sent from the pjm-customer-info mailing list at pjm-customer-info@majordomo.pjm.com:

> PJM, MISO Planning
> Joint and Common Wholesale Energy Market
> Single energy market would serve more than 42 million
>
> (Valley Forge, PA and Carmel, IN - January 21, 2002) PJM Interconnection and
> the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (MISO) today
> announced that they have executed a "Letter of Intent" to develop a single
> wholesale market for electricity producers and consumers in all or parts of 27
> Midwest and mid-Atlantic states, the District of Columbia and the Canadian
> province of Manitoba.
>
> 	The vision for achieving a single energy market is outlined in the
> Letter of Intent, which officials at PJM and MISO discussed with their
> respective members and boards last week.
>
> 	"This Letter of Intent reflects PJM and MISO's commitment to develop a
> single, robust energy market that meets the needs of all customers and
> stakeholders in the combined region," said Phillip G. Harris, PJM president
> and chief executive officer. "PJM and MISO's intent is to offer an innovative
> approach to serve the needs of the public and the individual states and
> governmental entities, while benefiting the economies in the regions
> encompassed by the market."
>
> 	"Working with PJM on a joint and common market design will allow both
> regions the opportunity to rapidly realize the benefits of a seamless power
> market," said James P. Torgerson, president and chief executive officer of the
> MISO, the nation's first FERC-approved regional transmission organization.
>
>
> The Letter of Intent outlines several guiding principles for the creation of a
> common energy market, including:
>
> *	The development of the market will be fully consistent with the safe and
> reliable operation of the electric power grid,
>
> *	The single energy market will be administered by two separate
> organizations with certain functions undertaken jointly and others undertaken
> through common processes,
> *
> *	The needs of the states, district and province, individually and
> collectively, will be integral to a successful solution,
> *
> *	Appropriate information technology network architectural design will be
> established that will provide for growth, redundancy, security and flexibility
> for the future, and
>
> *	A commitment to an open process to advise on the development of the
> market design by immediately establishing a joint stakeholder market
> committee.
>
> 	A single market through PJM and MISO's regions would span more than 1
> million square miles including all or portions of:
>
> *	From the Midwest ISO, including TRANSlink and the Southwest Power Pool
> (SPP): Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Minnesota,
> Missouri, Iowa, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio,
> Virginia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Wyoming, Louisiana, Texas,
> Mississippi and the Canadian province of Manitoba.
>
> *	From PJM and PJM West: Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey,
> West Virginia, Virginia, Ohio and the District of Columbia.
>
> MISO's scale of operations, including TRANSlink and SPP:
>
> *	17.5 million customers served
> *	114,000 megawatts of peak load
> *	125,000 megawatts of generating capacity
> *	118,000 miles of transmission lines
> *	$12.8 billion in installed assets
>
> PJM and PJM West's scale of operation include:
>
> *	25.1 million people served
> *	62,445 megawatts of peak load
> *	66,072 megawatts of generation capacity
> *	13,100 miles of transmission lines
> *	$6.5 billion in installed assets
> *	200 members
> *	298,011 gigawatt hours of annual energy
> *	614 generation sources with diverse fuel types
> *	Over $3.4 billion in annual billing
>
> 	####

Please DO NOT REPLY to this message. If you have a question for PJM Customer
Relations and Training, please complete and submit this form:
http://www.pjm.com/contact/questions.html

To unsubscribe from this list, send an e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pjm.com
containing only the following line in the body of the e-mail:

unsubscribe pjm-customer-info