---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 06/19/2000
08:34 AM ---------------------------

"Jim Miller" <jraggie1@pdq.net> on 06/16/2000 02:15:28 PM
To: "Wayne Duncan" <Wayneduncan@hotmail.com>, "Tom Svec"
<tsvec@generalwelding.com>, "Steve Schmidt" <sschmidt@urjet.net>, "Reid
Harmon" <reidharmon@compuserve.com>, "Pete Miller" <pmiller@fciconnect.com>,
"Paul Heidaker" <pheidak@yahoo.com>, "Pat Duncan" <wpduncanjr@aol.com>,
"Mike. W. Sowden" <Mike.W.Sowden@supervalu.com>, "Mike Vineyard"
<qcgi@qualitec.com>, "Michael Murr" <Michael.Murr@COMPAQ.com>, "Mcintyre"
<mcintyre@tca.net>, "Julie Paxton" <JuKaPa129@aol.com>, "John Terry"
<Tangler@usa.com>, "Jimmy Martin" <Jimmy.Martin@COMPAQ.com>, "Jim Lawler"
<wb365@email.msn.com>, "Janey Sowden" <janebarb@aol.com>, "Gene Stpierre"
<Gene.Stpierre@COMPAQ.com>, "Fred Valente" <fvalente@micro.ti.com>, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Danny A Dequeant" <Danny.Dequeant@cmcsg.com>, "Carla /
Johnny Preston" <JLCPRESTON@aol.com>, "AKoebig" <AKoebig@aol.com>
cc:
Subject: FW:

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Lanham [mailto:blanham@wbctx.com]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 12:36 PM
To: Vince Wilson; Roger Welsch; Vickie & Dwayne Valencik; Bob Stalcup; Randy
T. Rogers; Murray Ricks; Howard Pebley; Charlie Preslar; Harold Mullen;
James R. Miller; Robert Ligon; Robert C Lanham; Sherie Garrett; Mark Fuller;
Bruce Anderson
Subject:

What to Expect From Gun Control

 these are the facts right out of the history books

 Interesting bit of information.

 "In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to

 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were

 rounded up and exterminated.

 "In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5

 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and

 exterminated.

 "Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million

 Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and

 exterminated.

 "China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million

 political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and

 exterminated.

 "Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000

 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and

 exterminated.

 "Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000

 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

 "Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one

 million 'educated' people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up

and exterminated."

 Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century

 because of gun control: 56 million.

 The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, ask them "Who do

 YOU want to round up and exterminate?" With guns, we are citizens. Without

 them, we are subjects.

 - att1.htm


Ben,

I hope I passed the test........The retreat went very well.  I've been
thinking about your role at Cinergy and have concluded that involvement in
the DG area is the best place for you to grow and develop as an executive.
The assignment will be tough because you will be front running the market.
But, the opportunity to develop an expertise in marketing in this area will
be invaluable if the industry develops as I believe it will.  Let's talk.

Dad

-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com [mailto:Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 1:17 PM
To: jrogers@cinergy.com
Subject:

This is a test to see if you are checking your e-mail these days.  I have a
feeling that you have not been, due to your board presentation last week.
Mike M. tells me he will be up there today - hope that goes well for you
guys.  I really think there could be something there.  Please give me a
call sometime soon.  Things are going well here and we have been quite
busy.  Give me a call sometime.  The number is (713) 853-7998. See ya!
Ben


Start Date: 1/10/02; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011020.txt


When: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US &
Canada).
Where: EB3335

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

This meeting has been cancelled for today and rescheduled for Thursday at
1:30 p.m. in EB3335.


Is this the right Mike Miller, did you go to LJM or are you still here?


will call shortly.


No, but MKM apparently thought this issue did impact the idea of uniformity
of approach among the pipelines, which is Shelley's turf.  df

Susan Scott
02/12/2001 01:24 PM
To: Drew Fossum@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Alt. FT on TW

Drew, do I now have to run all tariff filings by Shelley too?
I am not complaining, because she always has good input, but I don't want to
be in a TW Options situation ever again.  Please advise.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 02/12/2001
01:24 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           02/12/2001 01:16 PM

To: Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Alt. FT on TW

Shelley,  here is the filing I was talking about.
Susan,  can you get Shelley a copy of my comments sent down today?  thanks
MK
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron on 02/12/2001
01:10 PM ---------------------------

Susan Scott
02/08/2001 01:45 PM
To: Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
sstojic@gbmdc.com, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Alt. FT on TW

Here is a slightly revised version of a tariff filing to allow TW to allocate
alternate firm by price.
I know everyone has been busy, but please try to get comments to me next
week.  Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 02/08/2001
01:44 PM ---------------------------

Susan Scott
01/31/2001 04:03 PM
To: Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
sstojic@gbmdc.com, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Alt. FT on TW

Please see the attached.  As you can see, there are a couple of issues we
probably need to discuss.  Please let me know your comments and questions.

(We do not have a target filing date yet; after we reach a consensus on what
this is going to look like, how rates will be calculated, etc., Ramona will
be better able to determine how much time will be needed to make the
necessary system changes.)


Steve:

During our chat I mentioned Amy Oberg was attending a competitive
intelligence conf.  I've pasted her Session Notes below.  I think you will
find them interesting - I've asked Amy to get on your calendar to discuss a
"CI 101" education project with you. This effort will help address some of
the concerns you raised.  As I mentioned she is currently working with eThink
to implement a global "Enron Edge" collection effort and I think the CI 101
project would dovetail very well.  Amy has other material available from the
conference when you need it.

Enjoy the notes - Pete

III. Session Notes: (sessions attended by A Oberg)

What Should You Tell Mgmt When They Ask About the Value of CI? Ben Gilad
? Case study, Levi Strauss: example of extremely damaging blindspots -
? Levi Strauss market value went from $14b to $8B in three years ('96-'99)
? Market share went from 48% ('90) to 25% ('98)
? Shut down 29 factories, laid off 16,000+ people in '98 as sales dropped 13%
? Blindspots = competitors - didn't know them (GAP, Calvin Klein, etc);
trends - didn't understand them (kids don't wear what their parents do, one
size does not fit all, etc)
? Cost for Levi's to set up really, really good CI function = $500,000
annually
? Cost for Levi's to call in consultants and problem still not solved =
$$850,000,000 !
? Case study, GE and Jack Welch: example of CI culture:
? Jack's greatest achievement (per Jack): "we made this company think outside
of itself". This is a CI culture.
? CI "is not a program, system, or function ---- it's a culture"
? "Intelligence is all about managing risk" (note: key element of Enron's
culture --- the two are intimately connected)
? "A junior level market analyst is not a BI/CI competency"
? CI professionals "paint the picture of the future" of the company; are
"guardians of the future"
? "CI/BI is the total knowledge a company possesses about the environment in
which it competes. It is synthesized from the vast amounts of bits and pieces
of external information bombarding the firm every day. It paints a whole
picture of the present and future competitive arena for management decisions."
? "This is what a competent CI program should deliver:
1. early warning of competitive threats
2. early identification of competitive growth opportunities
3. benchmarking of best practices
4. quicker response to market moves
5. better understanding of major players: customers, suppliers, politicians
6. future scenarios for strategic planning
7. accurate estimates for tactical decisions
8. improved development activities
9. identification of blind spots
? Bottom line "grand prize" = reduced risks, external focus, identification
of blind spots (yours and competitors)
? Peter Drucker, Forbes 1998: in the next 10-15 years, collecting outside
information is going t be the next frontier."

Building a True Intelligence Capability, Ben Gilad
? How competitive is your company? 1. Does it viscerally know its market? 2.
Can it predict reaction to its initiatives? 3. Is it blind?
? Numerous case studies of when CI could have been a "life saver" but was not
utilized - Sears (from #1 retailer in the world to #4 and dropping), Schwinn
(missed mountain bikes market), Goodyear (missed "ugly tire" market), others.
? #1 danger = competitive blind spots. Classic example: large companies pay
attention to other large companies; large companies hire large consulting
firms; large consulting firms learn from large companies, "and so on and so
forth until Chapter 11 do them apart"
? #2 danger = unchallenged assumptions. Classic examples: corporate myths,
corporate taboos
? Competitive intelligence is "any information that tells top management
whether or not the company is still competitive"
? The role of CI is "the guardian of company competitiveness"
? The CI process is "any organizational design that somehow ensures:
? That CI flows to one place (CI mgr as "weaver"; you see the forest, others
see the trees)
? That is turned into strategic updates
? That updates reach top mgmt regularly
? That top mgmt discusses, analyzes, debates, and does something w/ the
intelligence (key role of CI is to affect thinking, to change the Corp.
worldview)
? That the intelligence is used to uncover blind spots (regardless of how
holy they are)
? That the intelligence is used to empower employees (creating a culture of
sharing knowledge; tried tying $ to sharing, putting sharing in PD and
neither worked. What worked was recognition via feedback about what resulted
from their sharing)
? That the most "fearless, most observant, most out of the box thinker" in
the org becomes the Dir. of CI and then VP of Corporate Competitiveness
? That the CI Dir. reports to a powerful and eager exec
? That this exec is the CEO/President"
? Companies organize CI units in two different ways: CI as information center
(AT&T, Kraft, Kodak, McDonald Douglas, Ameritech, Dupont, Citicorp) or as
decision based intelligence (Motorola, Pfizer, Corning, NutraSweet, 3M,
Xerox, Marriott, Shell, IBM, others)
? Best Foods has "one of the best CI units today"
? Charge back of CI activities to units "doesn't work because if it costs,
units won't use it"
? Building awareness works - General Mills trained 120+ people about CI
? Bottom line: company needs to be competitively oriented, so awareness and
attitude are what count.
? Intelligence input should be mandatory across the organization
? Intelligence should be personally delivered once a week to the exec
committee
? "If you accept your role as that of passive competitor tracking, you'll be
collecting coupons till the end of time"

Successful CI = Impact, John Hovis
? "CI must be part of the company's strategic management system because ( it
lights up the targets"
? Case study of Avnet Inc. (note: John Hovis is Sr VP, Investors Relations &
Corp. Planning for Avnet)
? Evolution of Strategic Mgmt Process: Stage 1 (1997) = no research or
intelligence activities, little or no strategic planning;  Stage 2 (1998) =
limited library or research function, strategic planning a separate activity;
Stage 3 (1999) = intelligence system in place, strategic management function
fairly well developed; State 4 (2000) = comprehensive intelligence system in
place and working effectively with full integration; comprehensive strategic
management system in place and working effectively
? Tool: "SLAM" chart = strategic leverage matrix. Used among other analysis
techniques
? Strategic positioning of CI enables company to "play the game differently"
and produce "discontinuous innovation". Crucial.

CI Analysis: Get Real! Liam Fahey
? Competitor analysis (aka: "CA")
? CA driving questions: which competitors should we analyze? What should we
learn about them? How can we leverage CA to learn more about customers,
suppliers, marketplace changes, etc? How can we integrate CA into decision
making?
? CA principles:
1. Purpose: not to learn about competitors, but to enable thinking, decision
making, action
2. Always focus on the future
3. Insights are the value!
4. Focus analysis on assessments, insights, implications - and NOT on
description
? Strategy Domains: outwitting (thinking), outmaneuvering (doing), and
outperforming (results) - of current, emerging, and potential competitors
? Strategy Arenas: factors (suppliers, materials, HR, etc. channels
(distribution), end customers, institutions (political, legislative, courts,
etc.
? Which competitors to focus on?
? Which do we understand the least?
? Which has strategies most different to our own?
? Which are affecting strategic change?
? Which are failing?
? Which are potential harbingers of emerging / future marketplace?
? Competitor analysis framework: assets & capabilities, the organization,
firm in the environment, mind set
? Knowing current strategy is not enough - must identify future strategy
? Activity/value chain analysis must be future focused
? Identifying and assessing competitor's assumptions is extremely important
(as well as own)
? "We over estimate what we are and under estimate what we are not"

An Advanced Intelligence Training Model, Lenny Fuld, Ben Gilad, Jan Herring
? "Aha! Means intelligence, not data"
? Data = unconnected bits; information = knowledge built by looking at
several data points; intelligence = the implications of the organized
information.
? Each industry as its own set of key drivers for costs; a cost driver is an
extrinsic factor that affects costs; to analyze costs, you need to focus on
the right drivers (ex: cost drivers of PG&E, fixed asset intensive, highly
regulated)
? Question to determine cost drivers: is the competitor in the same
business?  - apples to apples
? Competitor analysis based upon Porter's Five Forces - barriers to entry,
suppliers, buyers, substitutes, rivalry
? Strategic options are those that fight the forces; reducing/fighting the
forces is the essence of competitive strategy; anything that doesn't, isn't
strategy
? CI's job is to watch all five forces
? 4 quadrant analysis: drivers, strategy, mgmt assumptions, capabilities
? 4 main CI questions every company needs to answer:
1. is the competitor happy? (w/ its strategy, position, etc. = degree of
complacency)
2. what are the competitor's likely moves (what should the competitor do?
What will the competitor likely do?)
3. what are the things your companies does that make the competitor really
mad? (their hot buttons - these will cost you a lot of $ if things go bad)
4. what are the competitors blindspots? (where strategy doesn't fit reality
any longer? If you know mgmt assumptions, you can know these)
? Parties that need CI = management as users, existing management procedures
(operations), selves (CI people)
? Types of KITS (key intelligence topic questions): strategic issues &
decisions (should be 40% of time), early warning topics (40% of time), key
players - competitors, customers, others (20% of time)
? Measuring CI/BI effectiveness: examples = time savings, cost savings, cost
avoidance, revenue increase, value added, combined values, other.
? "foster cultural acceptance of intelligence activities"

CI and the Web: What We Know about Knowledge Management Over Distance, Bruce
Kogut
? "Intelligence is more necessary now than ever before in business"
? Digitization of context
? Open sourcing - the Linux model: worked because of dislike of MicroSoft;
"gift giving" culture between developers, modular development of software
? CI and "digital anthropologists": web is changing the coordination of
space; control and ownership are not the same thing; social context is the
challenge.

Developing a Successful CI Program, John Prescott
? Review of recent APQC study on CI
? Some sponsors of study: Entergy, Southern, Shell
? Usually a "critical event" ("Big Bang") happens to the company before a CI
unit/function is initiated
? CI must be planted in the culture
? Key findings of study:
? CI structure emerges from Big Bang
? Need a well defined focus for CI
? Need a standardized process for CI
? Need a champion
? CI is a social process
? CI needs to be supported by technical processes
? Need to build trust and credibility to be effective
? French model of CI = human network; practiced by Concordia

Executive Roundtable: Moderator; Max Downham, former VP, NutraSweet;
Participants: Steve Necessary, CEO, PowerTV; William Maiola, VP, Coca Cola;
Michael Pticher, VP B2B Marketing, i2go.com, formerly Nat'l Sales Dir for
Bitney Bowes.
? Maiola: most useful intelligence is on emotions of competitor's decision
makers; Coke has done a lot of scenario development; "everyone is in the
intelligence business"; most appealing to executive users - what is your
hypothesis? what is your insight?
? Necessary: follow the 3 B's - be brief, be reliable, be gone; E strategy =
E competitive advantage.
? Pitcher: be sure to include in research  3 Ps: partnerships, people,
passions. These influence decisions; question to ask - is it a signal or is
it just noise?


All applications residing on the R: drive will be temporarily unavailable from Friday, September 21, 2001 at 11:00 P.M. until 11:30 PM for users logging into the CORP domain serviced by Enron Net Works.  The outage is needed to perform required system maintenance updates and give us better monitoring ability to ensure consistent and  efficient operations.

Any questions or concerns regarding this system outage can be directed to Michael S. White (713) 853-9001.

The following have been identified as business critical applications that will be affected by the outage:

Sitara
CMS
Equity trading systems (R:\eqpm directory)
Adaytum
CQG
TMS
PowerMap Europe
PowerDat Europe
MapInfo Professional
Secretariat


See Attached:

John Buchanan


Karen, please call me when you receive this email.  Thank you.  Rick
Slemaker, Publisher

 - Ken Lay Denne letter 20015.pdf
 - PBS WETV Info.pdf


Tana,

Can we accomplish that by you initiating a change to their current trading
profile in Profile Manager ??

Regards,
tm

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 4:12 PM
To: Sever, Stephanie; Lees, Lisa
Cc: Nettelton, Marcus; Moran, Tom; Guidroz, Walter
Subject: Ontario Power Generation

Per conv. a minute ago with Marcus, Christi Nicolay in the Regulatory Group
just checked and Ontario Power Generation does not have a FERC marketing
license.  That leaves them to buying US power only (both east & west OK).
Please make this change immediately.

Thanks!


let me think about it.  i am deep at wr.  show me a bid for griese and maybe
something can be worked out.


Current word on the street (as of this morning anyway):

Vote by CPUC to suspend direct access will be put off until at least June 28
meeting
Commissioner Bilas will draft an alternative that does not suspend direct
access
Drafts of the decisons are not available
Sacramento leadership has told Lynch, President of CPUC, that there should be
no vote to suspend direct access as long as negotiations on legislation for a
comprehensive solution continue (these include direct access)

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


Sara,

I talked with Brent Hendry late yesterday.  He would like to be e-mailed a form template called "Credit Review Sheet" because he is implementing something at his new job similar to what we have.  Who would I call to get such a form?

Thanks!
Becky
x37599


---------------------- Forwarded by Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron on 04/12/2001
06:20 PM ---------------------------
From: Bradley Jones/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/12/2001 03:34 PM
To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joey Taylor/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Originations

Errol and Joey,
Just an FYI -
The Middle Market - West gas orig group is changing it's name to Gas
Origination - West.  Now when you enter Orig into the West file the Orig
Group should be the new name.
Also, on your Orig Schedule please start showing the West orig as Gas
Origination - West so that everything will match when it is published to the
web.

thanks,
brad


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Coal Trading
The liquidity in trading of the Standard European Coal Agreement has
increased significantly over the last 6 weeks.  Many counterparties that
previously opted to stay on the sidelines finally chose to join the game.
Since the contract's inception at the beginning of the year, Enron has traded
a total of 5.3 million tons against the SECA contract, of which 3.8 million
tons has been traded via EnronOnline since July 2000.  We are 5.3 million
tons of a total traded market of 5.8 million tons.

Principal Investments
Tridium Inc., the leading provider of Internet-based automation
infrastructure solutions, announced the close of a $20 million round of
capital funding. The funds will be used to increase Tridium,s sales and
technical support offices in North America, expand its operations into Europe
and Asia, and enhance its technology and products. kRoad Ventures, L.P. and
Enron North America each contributed $10 million in venture capital.

Corporate Development
Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Allegheny
Energy, Inc., announced the signing of a definitive agreement under which
Allegheny Energy Supply will purchase three Enron natural gas-fired merchant
generating facilities. The acquisition is expected to close in the 2nd
quarter of 2001.

PERFORMANCE REVIEW

The deadline to provide feedback is Friday, November 17.  If you have been
selected to provide feedback on one of your fellow employees, please take the
time to fill out an evaluation online at www.pep.enron.com.

IN THE NEWS

"Enron Corp., already North America's biggest, buyer and seller of natural
gas and electric power is dead serious about its efforts to capture a big
slice of the $400 billion global trade in pulp, paper and lumber."
-Reuters News Service

2000 CHAIRMAN,S AWARD NOMINEES
Please join us in congratulating the ENA/EIM/EGM/ employees who have been
recognized as Chairman,s award nominees.

Congratulations to:

 Irma Alvarez  Alan Aronowitz  Rick Bergseiker  Carol Coats  Joya Davis
Rufino Durante
 Sue Foust  Julie Gomez  Barbara Gray  Jackie Griffith  John Harrison  Gerri
Irvine
 Kathy Benedict  Michael Kelley  Mike McConnell  Dave Nommensen Ina Norman
Juan Padron
 Veronica Parra  Michael Roberts  Rhonda Robinson Kevin Sweeney  Helen
Taylor  Stacey White

Extra kudos to BARBARA GRAY, who is a finalist for the 2000 Chairman,s
Award.  Barbara and ten other individuals are flying to San Antonio from
around the world to be honored at Enron,s annual Management Conference.  One
of these finalists will be recognized as the 2000 Chairman,s Award winner.

WELCOME
New Hires ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Anil Chandy, Alejandra Chavez
EGM ) Marty Cates, JoAnne Underwood, Brad Miller

Transfers to ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Mark Wadlington, Jennifer Blay-Smith, Georgian Landau, Kathryn Bussell,
John Coleman, Steven Gillespie, Clarissa Garcia, Ina Rangel, Farouk Lalji,
Eva Rainer, Chuchu Wang, Smith Day
EGM ) Gloria Solis, Carmella Jones, Nancy Haralson

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed outside of Enron.


Rika,
I have had a request and I also think it is a good idea to put the regional gas price for the following regions.

PJM - Transco Zone 6 Non New York
NY - Transco Zone 6 New York
NEPOOL - Algonquin

The heat rates would then be calculated off the appropriate regional gas price.

Thanks
Paul


Chris , this deal is already in there as 160410.  I killed your deal 164725
buddy sorry.........

Chris Germany
02/09/2000 05:17 AM
To: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Spot Deal at COH

My Sitara is working.  This is deal 164725.  Joann, I don't care if they get
a few more or less dt's.  I could not make it come out to the exact volumes
shown below.  I put everything in as prorata thru the end of the month.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2000 05:16
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
02/09/2000 03:55 AM
To: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
bperron@columbiaenergy.com
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Spot Deal at COH

Brian, correct me if I'm wrong but I think this is the deal you did with
Craig Taylor.  Is this deal for more than 1 month?

Victor, Joann,  I remember not putting in a deal ticket because I thought it
was included in the first of the month numbers and we were going to treat
this as a financial deal.  Ask Scott Goodell to put it in.  I can't get into
our lovely Sitara system and hopefully I will be gone before you guys get in
today.

Joann, if this gas will not flow on secondary transport from the pool for the
10th and the 11th, call my pager and leave a voicemail.  Also, if there are
no constraints and CES can take this gas over a couple of days (I know this
will not work for 7-5) then do that instead of prorating through the rest of
the month.

Sorry guys!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2000 03:38
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Joann Collins @ ENRON                           02/08/2000 01:37 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Spot Deal at COH

are you aware of this deal if so what are the deal #'s???

---------------------- Forwarded by Joann Collins/Corp/Enron on 02/08/2000
01:35 PM ---------------------------

kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com on 02/08/2000 12:45:06 PM
To: " - *Joann_Collins@enron.com" <Joann_Collins@enron.com>
cc: " - *Perrone, Brian" <bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com>

Subject: Spot Deal at COH

On Jan 28th Brian did a spot deal with Chris for a total of 26817 dth to COH
at
$3.06.  I did not include these volumes in my first of the month numbers
unfortunately so if you could hook me up now that would be much appreciated.
Here's the breakdown by market area:

5-2 1577

7-1 1823

7-5 22717

7-9 700

Please start the deliveries on the 10th.  I don't care how you deliver the
others but for 7-5 please prorate for the rest of the month if possible (1136
dth/day).

Thanks very much,
KD


After the Day ahead market ran, the COI branch group TTC in the (N-S)
direction was changed from 4100MW to 4000MW, Path 15 branch group TTC in the
(N-S) direction was changed from 1275MW to 1100MW, and the Midway-Vincent
branch group TTC in the (N-S) direction was changed from 3000MW to 2500MW.
These
changes are for HE1300 through HE2100 for operating day 07/31/01. The reason
for the change is Line outage. The first applicable Hour Ahead market to run
with these values is HE 1800. Cuts will be made in Real Time for HE1300
through HE1700. The ISO will update you of any changes in line rating
status. Sent by ISO Market Operations.

The system conditions described in this communication are dynamic and
subject to change.  While the ISO has attempted to reflect the most current,
accurate information available in preparing this notice, system conditions
may change suddenly with little or no notice.


Houston Legal Trading Operations re Derivatives:

Gas:  40%

Alberta Power:  45%

Ontario Power:  15%

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
(713) 345-7732
(713) 646-3393 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Please see attached...

Tom - Please look over this work request and if you need something different
please let me know.

Thanks,
Hollis


Ricardo,

This consultant report has Brunner Island back on. Our sheet doesn't have it
coming back untill Nov.3. Which is correct?

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 04:00
PM ---------------------------

"Brad Galante" <strat_alert@hotmail.com> on 11/01/2000 02:52:11 PM
To: ghopley@enron.com, Rogers.Herndon@enron.com, Mark.Dana.Davis@enron.com,
Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com, Paul.J.Broderick@enron.com, pdth39@hotmail.com,
Chris.Dorland@enron.com, Ricardo.Perez@enron.com
cc:
Subject: 1600 Report

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - 11-01 1600.xls


Jeff,

Our developer wants a map shows Sempra's Mexican pipeline.  Can we get it
from you?  Sorry for so many requests.

thanks,

Ming
---------------------- Forwarded by Mingcheng Lian/AP/Enron on 05/23/2001
01:46 PM ---------------------------
From: Kurt Lindahl/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 01:38 PM
To: Mingcheng Lian/AP/Enron@Enron, Michael
McGarry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: George Thomas/ENRON@enronXgate, Courtney Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: RE: Sempra map

Ming,

Thanks for the map.  What we really need is a map that shows Sempra's Mexican
pipeline.

Kurt

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Lian, Mingcheng
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 8:42 AM
To: McGarry, Michael; Lindahl, Kurt
Cc: Thomas, George; Campbell, Courtney
Subject: Re: Sempra map

Mike,

I got this Sempra map from our SF office.  Hope it is useful to you.

cheers,

Ming
---------------------- Forwarded by Mingcheng Lian/AP/Enron on 05/23/2001
08:33 AM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/22/2001 08:50 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Mingcheng Lian/AP/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Sempra map   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

Here's a map.

 - ld2d-#69334-1.DOC << File: ld2d-#69334-1.DOC >>

Best,
Jeff


At today's FERC meeting, the Commission voted out a draft order in GridSouth's RTO proceeding.  The original March 14, 2001 order accepted the GridSouth "Order No. 2000 compliance filing" subject to modifications and requiring meetings with Santee Cooper to achieve their participation in the RTO.  Today's order denies rehearing and grants clarification.  Following is a brief summary of the pertinent points of the order.

The order requires that all terms, rates and conditions must be on file with the FERC.  The original order recognized GridSouth as the sole provider of transmission service on its grid, requiring all uses under the GridSouth tariff.   The RTO applicants requested  clarification that the FERC was not requiring unbundling of retail rates.  They had intended to place their bundled retail load under the GridSouth Tariff for terms and conditions, but not rates.  The rehearing order does not assert jurisdiction over bundled retail rates, however GridSouth is now the sole provider of transmission service and the applicants must take all transmission services, including transmission underlying bundled retail service from GridSouth.  Therefore, the order requires all terms, conditions and rates to be on file at FERC.
All specific rate issues will be deferred until GridSouth files a Section 205 filing.  This allows a possibility that GridSouth could file different rates for native load and FERC jurisdictional transmission services.  It is not clear what the FERC will do with this issue.
GridSouth will initially operate three control areas.  A request by Joint Protesters to integrate resources and loads anywhere on the system and allow netting of imbalances over all CAs was denied because Order No. 2000 did not require a single control area.  However to allow one-stop shopping, the Commission is requiring a single agreement which can contain information for each delivery zone.  (Compliance is required in 10 days.)
Though the Commission did not require netting over all control areas now, the order did suggest that GridSouth should give consideration, in consultation with parties, of mechanisms to minimize energy imbalances on an RTO-wide basis through either operational or trading mechanisms.
Defers issues relating to ancillary services and Hourly Imbalance charge until supplemental filing.
Denies rehearing request of Santee Cooper asking the FERC to find that unlimited passive ownership compromises the independence of an RTO and should not be allowed.  The order finds that a case-by-case review is appropriate where the RTO Applicants have an opportunity to show the passive ownership proposal is designed to protect the financial interests of the passive owners but does not allow TO control of the RTO decision making process.
Allows right of first refusal of existing GridSouth members to purchase new equity interests issued by the Board until the Initial Public Offering, in order to protect existing members against dilution of the value of their membership interests in case the Board were to issue new equity at too low a price.
The Commission does reiterate that its goal is the formation of a single RTO in the Southeast.  Scope and configuration will be addressed in a separate order in review of the May 14 filing.
Denies EPMI's request for a settlement judge proceeding.
Denies EPMI's request for rehearing on conditioning market-based rate authority on RTO participation.
Denies EPMI's requested clarification that GridSouth cannot incur significant start-up costs before the independent Board is seated.  The order notes that GridSouth represents it will not incur significant costs for software or hardware for real-time balancing until approved by an independent Board.


This email is intended for those Forum participants who have confirmed for
the Sunday kickoff event.

Lunch will be starting at 1 pm. You will need to travel from the hotel to
the restaurant (allow approximately 30 minutes). Lunch will be followed by
another activity which will conclude around 4:30 pm.

More detailed information will be sent out in the next few weeks on the
location and directions to the restaurant.

Todd Hudson
Information Systems Analyst
California Gas Transmission
Pacific Gas & Electric Company
415.973.1386


Is it possible for Power to be on our floor?


let me know when you want to go out.  i can go out any night.


Strong Drugs!!!

Becky Pitre
02/13/2001 11:00 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Waiting

Must be on drugs.

Robin Rodrigue
02/13/2001 10:48 AM
To: Becky Pitre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Waiting

We saw an even better one the other day.  Someone was trying to sell a 1972
Calladic Hurse.  It's white with orange flames on the front fenders!!!  And
it has a huge stereo system in the back.  Now what kind of freak owns
something like that and why would you announce it at work?

Becky Pitre
02/13/2001 10:42 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Waiting

While waiting for the computer guy to fix my software connections I went
browsing on the "For Sale" bulletin board.  Some lady is selling a Ball
Python.  The high points of the snake included the comment that it has "never
bitten" anyone and that it come with an exercise stick.   If you were a
snake, would you bite someone with an exercise stick?  Sounds like a time
bomb to me.The stupid snake also comes with a bed and a light!  Is that so it
can read in bed?  Who cares about a stupid snake.  The things people try to
sell.  FYI.  B


Imagine how wonderful it would feel to help a large number of children in your area and
making $4,000 to $12,000 per month doing it?
Helping needy children and parents AND at the same time supporting your own family very well financially.
Every day in your community there are single parents struggling to make ends meet and wondering where the money will come from to cover their children's basic expenses.
Most of these parents are hard working people who just need help from the person who has a legal responsibility to give it to them.
 Every day a large number of parents call us for help in collecting their child support.    Many more than we can possibly handle.  We need the help of caring and dedicated people who would like to enter a new high paying prestigious profession.
The court has decided how much these parents are to receive but the caseloads are so large that the results are that there is over  $32 Billion dollars worth of uncollected Child Support in the US today   and this amount grows by millions every week.
If you would be interested in helping us, then  we have all of the training that you will need to start a new business in this high growth profession of "Child Support Processing!"
We have the resources available to you to help you track down deadbeat parents and force them to pay what they legally owe, without ever having to come into contact with them!
 We have the most extensive Computer Data Bases in the world for the processing of Child Support.   Our databases allow you to track down dead beats, find their assets and then collect the child support, which is due.  These powerful databases will be available to you if you choose to join us.
  You can do what private investigators do, legally, and for a fraction of what it would normally cost! And you can do it from the comfort of your own home office!
More details about our Child Support Collection Course:
  Child Support Collection has reached epidemic proportions, $32 billion nationally  ; state agencies are simply too understaffed!  State agencies are typically very happy when we assist a parent.  We find the dead beat and their assets and the state agencies are pleased to use their government powers, working with us, to collect the back child support.
 Our Child Support Collection course teaches you to how locate the DEAD-BEAT parent, their assets, employment, bank accounts and how to collect on those assets.
The manual supplies the forms, brochures, and child support business methodology.
We also have the most powerful reporting capabilities at your disposal to help you track down dead-beat parents.
 Unpaid child support is an epidemic . . . and you can be the cure!
As our national and local media remind us every day, millions of custodial parents are struggling to raise their families without the child support to which they are entitled. In fact, you or someone you know is probably tackling this problem right now.
 This Child Support Collection Course teaches you to recover your own child support payments. Or you can learn to help others in need, earning about 25% to 30% of what is collected.  That translates to $4,000 . . . $8,000 . . .even $12,000 earned each month collecting for others! You'd be hard-pressed to come up with any other legal business opportunity that allows you to earn such a significant income while performing such a valuable community service.
Not only do you have the potential to make thousands of dollars a month recovering delinquent child support payments, you'll also "earn" the gratitude of custodial parents and their children who are finally receiving the money they're due!
You might be thinking a successful child support recovery business would require a difficult time commitment or a lot of expensive equipment. Not at all! You can make thousands of dollars each month, part-time or full-time, working from your home, with only a telephone and a home computer!
This course places you at the leading edge of a major national trend, namely, privatizing the recovery of delinquent child support payments. Whereas the government succeeds only one fifth of the time in this area, well-trained private parties are doing four times better!
And remember every time you recover a payment, you can earn 25% to 30% of what you find!
 We provide step by step instructions for you to follow, enabling you to collect all back-owed child support for yourself or anyone else you choose. It is not necessary to have in-depth legal knowledge or even a college education.
According to the Department of Health and Human Services, absent parents in the United States have a big bill to pay: $32 billion in delinquent child support payments. That is over 15 million cases, with 1.5 million new cases added every year. More than half of court-ordered child support cases become delinquent at some time, and in more than one fourth of cases, no payments are ever made.
Children deserve and need the support they have been awarded, but government agencies aren't offering any real help because they are totally over whelmed. In fact, the agencies are so flooded with requests that they only collect about 18% of the child support money they go after. In other words, the government typically has an 82% failure rate! No private business could survive with that kind of record, and the impact on children can be devastating.
Statistics show that after a divorce, an absent parent's available income goes up 43%, while the custodial parent's spending money goes down 20%.
 With your help, children in need have a four-times-greater chance of receiving the money they are due than if they relied on the government for recovery.
One mother has told us that working with the government to find an absent parent "is like beating your head against a brick wall. The frustration and futility you feel are enormous. Agencies crawl at a snails pace, and authorities often lose files or seem to make no progress with a case." But this same mother's outlook changed  after reviewing our course: "I would have given anything to have this knowledge years ago. This is the best $249.00 I have ever spent."
 We have Customer -Support staff available to you from
8:00AM to 9:00PM(Mountain Time) 6 days a week.
If you call this number, you can talk to one of our very experienced
Customer Support personnel. They can answer any questions you may have-with no obligation.
When you call our Customer -Support line, they can let you know of any specials we may be running. If you like what you read and hear about our courses, then the Customer -Support person can work with you to place your order. We are very low key. We merely give you the facts and you can then decide if you want to work with us or not. Don't let this
incredible opportunity pass you by!
 Call us at 1-503-345-9177  ____  8:00AM to 9:00PM (Mountain Time) 7 days per week
Customer Support -Personnel are standing by...
s13
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
If you wish to be  d e l e t e d  on our - l-i- s-t,
ple ase em ail  alma25@tabletennisfan.com.au
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  With your help, children in need have a four-times-greater chance of receiving the money they are due than if they relied on the government for recovery.


[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	START SHOPPING Baseball Basketball Fitness Golf Outdoor Running Soccer Equipment Fan Shop Footwear Women's Shopping Help Desk
		*Offer Details Offer expires October 12, 2001 at 3:00 PM PST.  This offer cannot be used with any other coupon/promotion. This offer does not apply to shipping, handling and tax.  Active.com reserves the right to terminate or modify the promotion at anytime.  Certain products and brands may not be eligible for this promotion, including but not limited to Nike, Jordan, Callaway, Cleveland Golf, Titleist, Columbia, Pacemaster, Cybex and Odyssey.

If, for any reason, you would prefer not to receive any future e-mail offers from Active.com,
send a blank e-mail to:leave-special-offer-588838X@mail.active.com


Lunch will be provided.  If you have any questions, please contact Digna Showers at 5-3445.  I am Donna Greif's new Administrative Assistant.  Thank You.


E-mails for Howard


I called the Committee lawyers and Andy Black and left a voice mail
indicating that you wanted to hear Chairman Barton's views on section 102 and
revenue sharing.

The attached "Good" language is still being worked on, but Dan and I find it
generally acceptable.  The subcommitte print contains the correct pagination
for section 102.

Second Issue:  Linda and I wopuld like you to talk to Sen. Wyden about his
tendency to attack Enron and other marketers given that we have worked with
his office to develop transparency legislation.  I'll discuss with you once
you catch your breath.


As long as the wire amount is OK, I don't think Houston will catch on.

-----Original Message-----
From: Crandall, Sean
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:36 AM
To: Thome, Stephen
Subject: RE: P&L associated with Avista transaction to cover NW book of business (Feb1-9)

Steve,

The difference is because I rounded the purchase prices from AEP and Avista in the P&L spreadsheet, rather than taking a weighted average.  The wire request amount is correct.

-----Original Message-----
From: Thome, Stephen
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 5:09 PM
To: Crandall, Sean
Cc: Sewell, Doug
Subject: RE: P&L associated with Avista transaction to cover NW book of business (Feb1-9)

Sean,

I came up with a $3936 difference between this and your wire requests.  The wire requests were on the high side.  I am sending it off to Houston with a note that we may need to revise it.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Crandall, Sean
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:29 PM
To: Thome, Stephen
Cc: Scholtes, Diana; Belden, Tim
Subject: P&L associated with Avista transaction to cover NW book of business (Feb1-9)

								6th Week	  	 Gross Revenue	  	 Expense	  	 Net P&L
	128	 88	  	  	 20.5	 19.25
Point	 Buy/Sale	 Counterparty	 On	 Off	 Price	 Deal #	 	On Hours	 Off hours	 On Hours	 Off hours	  	  	 On	 Off	 Total
MC	 S	 CRC	 	-25	 150	 508906	 	0	 2200	  $                -   	 $     330,000 	 $           -   	 $  42,350 	 $           -   	 $287,650
MC	 S	 BPA	 -25	 	75	 658386	 	3200	 0	  $        240,000 	 $             -   	 $     65,600 	 $         -   	 $   174,400 	 $         -
MC	 S	 BPA	 -50	 -50	 73	 600522	 	6400	 4400	  $        467,200 	 $     321,200 	 $   131,200 	 $  84,700 	 $   336,000 	 $236,500
MC	 S	 BPA	 -50	 -50	 72	 600521	 	6400	 4400	  $        460,800 	 $     316,800 	 $   131,200 	 $  84,700 	 $   329,600 	 $232,100
MC	 S	 GRAYS	 -10	 	64	 715879	 	1280	 0	  $         81,920 	 $             -   	 $     26,240 	 $         -   	 $     55,680 	 $         -
MC	 S	 BPA	 -14	 	47.5	 664061	 	1792	 0	  $         85,120 	 $             -   	 $     36,736 	 $         -   	 $     48,384 	 $         -
MC	 S	 BPA	 	-13	 47.5	 664061	 	0	 1144	  $                -   	 $      54,340 	 $           -   	 $  22,022 	 $           -   	 $  32,318
MC	 S	 BPA	 -50	 	42.9	 448835	 	6400	 0	  $        274,560 	 $             -   	 $   131,200 	 $         -   	 $   143,360 	 $         -
MC	 S	 BPA	 -50	 	42.75	 447576	 	6400	 0	  $        273,600 	 $             -   	 $   131,200 	 $         -   	 $   142,400 	 $         -
MC	 S	 Air Products	 -6	 	41.19	 737863	 	768	 0	  $         31,634 	 $             -   	 $     15,744 	 $         -   	 $     15,890 	 $         -
MC	 S	 Douglas	 -25	 	37.15	 831359	 	3200	 0	  $        118,880 	 $             -   	 $     65,600 	 $         -   	 $     53,280 	 $         -
MC	 S	 Intel	 -4	 	34.6	 802102	 	512	 0	  $         17,715 	 $             -   	 $     10,496 	 $         -   	 $      7,219 	 $         -
MC	 S	 BPA	 -25	 	34.5	 822090	 	3200	 0	  $        110,400 	 $             -   	 $     65,600 	 $         -   	 $     44,800 	 $         -
MC	 S	 BPA	 -15	 	31.85	 871641	 	1920	 0	  $         61,152 	0	  $     39,360 	 	  $     21,792
	41472	 12144	  $     2,222,981 	 $  1,022,340 	 $   850,176 	 $233,772 	 $1,372,805 	 $788,568 	 $2,161,373

	Total	 -324	 -138


No problem, we will have them to you by 2pm.   Also, I am still working on
getting this info to you in a more systematic manner but our IT people
are currently swamped.

liane_kucher@mcgraw-hill.com on 06/29/2000 04:26:57 PM
To: sneal@enron.com
cc: kelley_doolan@mcgraw-hill.com
Subject: Important bidweek information

Scott,
  Please let your gas traders know that Inside FERC will not accept bidweek
prices via fax any later than 2 p.m. Eastern time. It takes a great deal of
time
to input each deal by hand and then re-check the data for accuracy -- and
that's
before we even begin to analyze each pricing point to determine the indexes.
  If anyone has any questions, they can contact me at the number below.
Regards,
Liane Kucher, Associate Editor
Inside FERC's Gas Market Report
202-383-2147


[IMAGE]  Three  trading conferences under one roof... at the Hotel Okura, Amsterdam, 19-21 February 2001
 [IMAGE]    Over 70% of European companies face weather-related risk  Today's business has become all about risk and how  to mitigate it. Weather derivatives have become one of the key tools  industries as wide ranging as utilities, airlines, agriculture have  at hand to offset risks associated with temperature and precipitation.  So how do you take advantage of this new market  in weather trading that has emerged in Europe? What key issues do  you have to be aware of to mitigate your operational and trading  risks through weather? Amsterdam will be the place for traders,  marketers, exchanges, brokers, and executives powering the weather  trading industry to network with each other.     Speakers at this event will include:  Aquila, Systeia Capital Management, Mirant,  LIFFE, Element Re, Entergy-Koch Trading, Risk Management  Solutions, Centrica, Utilicorp, weatherXchange,  Aon Capital Markets and many  more ...  Click a link to find out more: [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]      	 [IMAGE]    UBS Warburg estimates that  profits from European power trading alone will top $2.4 billion in 2002  Add natural gas and oil and you're looking at a  huge pot of pure profit, only available to those companies that  know how to best take advantage of the rise of deregulation and  online trading in the European market.   Now in its 3rd year, this is THE conference where  the European Energy Industry talks about the business of energy  trading. Case studies from traders, brokers, online exchanges and  energy companies to help you stay at the forefront of the exploding  energy trading market.     Speakers at this event will include:  Dynegy, Altra Energy, OM Group, Powergen, Bergen-Energi,  Amsterdam Power Exchange, RWE Trading, ENDESA, The Utilities  Exchange, El Paso, SchlumbergerSema, TXU and many  more ...  Click a link to find out more: [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]      	 [IMAGE]    "Carbon  credits represent a significant asset that companies ignore at their  peril" Jonathan Johns, Ernst & Young  Emission trading options are ripe  for the picking - but how can you make sure you're ready to profit  from GHG? Let's face it - you really can't afford not to be, especially  as the World Bank has estimated demand in the international GHG  trading system to be in the order of US$20 billion per annum  by 2010.  Eyeforenergy is delighted to bring  you this event which will focus on how you can best seize this exciting  new market opportunity.     Speakers at this event will include:  BP, European Commission, Shell, Amerada Hess, Powergen,  RMS, Fortum, Natsource, RMC Group, EcoSecurities,  Rolls Royce, KfW, Point Carbon, IETA, TransAlta,  UK Dept of Environment, and many  more ...  Click a link to find out more: [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]
		  "Congratulations on a successful conference! I found it extremely  worthwhile. The structure and content were well-balanced, the organisation  tight, the venue first-class and the discussion, both in and out of the  conference hall, interesting and valuable." Ian French, Frost & Sullivan, Europe  All three events will take place at the Hotel Okura, Amsterdam on  the 19-21 February 2002 Click here to visit  the information website for all three events
		  Sponsors: [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]      Media Sponsors:   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]
		(c) Eyeforenergy 2002 All enquiries regarding this email should be sent to events@eyeforenergy.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 09/18/2000 08:33
AM ---------------------------

Soma Ghosh
09/18/2000 03:06 AM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Cris
Sherman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, "Ellison, Mike"
<Mike.Ellison@rbcds.com>, "McArthur, Ian" <IAN.MCARTHUR@ROYALBANK.COM>,
"Fleming, Blair" <BLAIR.FLEMING@ROYALBANK.COM>
cc: Brian Kerrigan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Alberta Pre-pay

All,

Please find attached the revised structure for the Alberta pre-pay.

The diagrams are accompanied by narrative & should provide some clarity.

Please note that the numbers used are not actual proposed prices/volumes &
have just been used for the purpose of illustrating the structure.

Regards,

Soma


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001 08:43 AM
---------------------------
From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 01/26/2001 07:15 AM CST
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Government Affairs-The Americas: Department Meeting Dates

Rick --

I agree with Mary that it may make sense if this guy is able to be on at our
next meeting (if space/time permits).  If it's ok, maybe Ginger can work with
Mary to arrange.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 01/26/2001 07:14 AM -----

	Mary Hain@ECT
	01/25/2001 01:05 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Government Affairs-The Americas: Department Meeting Dates

This is not public information yet but, assuming Tim gives his final okay, a
guy will be joining the trading floor to develop a renewable market including
a portfolio, trading, an index, auction, an Enron Online product, etc.  He
wants to formulate a well developed regulatory policy approach and has agreed
to draft up some bullet points for our use and has had preliminary meetings
with various groups in Houston including Jeff Keeler.  He also wants to
enlist the assistance of government affairs.  I suggested he do a
presentation at our next government affairs meeting.  Are we still having
people do presentations at our meetings?  Could we fit him in?

Ginger Dernehl@ENRON
01/25/2001 10:50 AM
To: assad@elektro.com.br, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Alberto
Levy/SA/Enron@Enron, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Allison
Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy Fabian/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara A
Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, cristinah@elektro.com.br, Carlos Gustavo
Azevedo/SA/Enron@Enron, Carmen Perez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Carolyn Cooney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chauncey
Hood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Damon
Harvey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donald
Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eidy
Catala/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric
Benson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Frank Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Geriann
Warner/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Gisele S
Braz/SA/Enron@Enron, Gloria Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Guillermo Canovas/SA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard
Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, jpr@ceibo.entelnet.bo, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Javier Pantoja/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Jean R
Dressler/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey
Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joao Paixao/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kathleen Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kerry Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Kikumi
Kishigami/NA/Enron@Enron, Kirsten Bellas/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara
Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Laurie Knight/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lindsay Meade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Luiz
Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marchris
Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Melinda Pharms/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Belzak/TOR/ECT@ECT, Mike Roan/ENRON@enronXgate, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Nancy Hetrick/NA/Enron@Enron, Patrick
Keene/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ray
Alvarez/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ricardo
Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Roy
Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Rubena Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sergio
Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Stella Chan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Terri
Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Tom Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Valeria Lima/SA/Enron@Enron, Vinio Floris/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Xi Xi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stacey Bolton/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Lynnette Barnes/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
McMurray/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda L Lawrence/NA/Enron@Enron, Earlene
O'Connell/NA/Enron@Enron, Margo Reyna/NA/Enron@Enron, Gus
Perez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Angela Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharonda
Stephens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Benson/NA/Enron@ENRON, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gia
Maisashvili/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Margaret
Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joan Stransky/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Government Affairs-The Americas: Department Meeting Dates

My apologies in getting this information to everyone so late, but some of the
dates are still a work in progress.  Please see below:

Government Affairs - The Americas
Department Meeting Dates for Year 2001

Date:   City/State   Location:
March 9   Houston, TX   The Woodlands Conf. Center
June?????
September 6  Houston, TX   The Woodlands Conf. Center
December 7  Houston, TX   Doubletree Hotel

FYI - The December 7 date could change.  I am trying to plan this meeting
around the company party again.

Thanks and feel free to call me if  you have any questions.

gngr
713-853-7751


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Hi Rob,

I think we would prefer if you would route the document back this way, and
Sheila or I will send it to the folks at GE.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/21/2000 04:05
PM ---------------------------

Scott Dieball@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/21/2000 03:59 PM
To: Kay Mann@ENRON, Sheila Tweed@ECT, Martin W Penkwitz/NA/Enron@Enron, "ROB
TAYLOR" <TAYLR@andrews-kurth.com>, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: GE - Form Purchase Agreement

All - Attached is a rewrite of Articles 20 (Indemnity) and 27 (Limitation of
Liability) of the draft agreement which includes our collective thoughts.

Rob - I understand that you "volunteered" to pull together our changes to the
draft agreement and to then forward on to GE.

If you have any questions, please give me a call.  Thanks.

Scott


Jim:  Thanks for your update.   As you recall, Phil attended the April 2000
Congressional staff trip to the Enron building.  Further,  for years we have
negotiated directly with his boss on electricity legislative efforts and we
have gained his support and leadership for Enron's positions.  We continue to
constantly update him and all staffers on our positions.  We will continue to
do so with yearly fact finding trips to Houston, meetings, letters, hearings,
briefings, coalition building, ope-eds, etc.  Fact is, the California issue
climaxed after federal legislation was declared "dead" for this Congress.  As
such, other active legislative vehicles have claimed Congressional
attention.  Thus, Phil was referring to a recent Senate hearing on the
California situation (October 5th) where we supplied questions, information,
etc. that no other member except Senator Gorton attended (i.e. low
interest.)  Having said this, as the cycle ramps up after the elections and
the new Congress convenes in January and February, Congressional interest
will return with "understanding" California being a key focus.  Educating on
the California situation will be amongst our primary objectives although in
the Congressional downtime, we must continue specific efforts with key
targets (i.e. Congressman Barton, Congressman Tauzin, Senator Murkowski,
etc.).  This is why, for instance, I had requested travel approval to attend
the Rippon Society's trip with the Speaker and these members in order to be
able to take advantate of opportunities to educate in informal settings.  We
will continue to find other opportunities and make opportunities to visit
with these Members while they are out of D.C. between now and January.

As for Private Use legislation, Enron developed and led the strategy which
brought EEI to the table with resulting final consensus legislation.  This
consensus came very close to being added to the tax package which may move
Friday but was dropped due to its high price tag.  As for NAERO, there is NOT
consensus.  In fact, we support Senator Gorton's version of the bill but
oppose Congressman Wynn's version.  Since Joe Hartsoe has been the lead with
NAERO, I will defer further comment to him.  As for comprehensive
legislation, the Senate came very close and indeed pass a bill out of
Committee.  The issues that doomed the bill were the two "non-consensus"
issues:   the native load exception and RPS (which indeed a deal was actually
cut.)  In truth,  we also had cut the deal on native load exception but
consensus came too late in the year for EEI and NARUC to formally sign-off.
This is why we have tried to get the EEI process moving now.

Thank you again for your speech and the update.

	James D Steffes
	10/16/2000 08:46 PM

		 To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Congressional Opinion of Restructuring

Cynthia, et al --

FYI.  I was on a panel with Phil Moeller today in Las Vegas (he was the
moderator).  Very nice guy.  No real issues developed.  I used (very
liberally) Steve Kean's testimony in San Diego to talk about California and
some material on RTOs.  My speech is attached below.

Phil indicated that he thought that there was agreement on the Public Power
Tax issues and on NAERO language.  He highlighted that comprehensive language
could be difficult if not impossible next year.  (Joe - can you please send
me a copy of the NAERO bill and any summaries).

While Phil seemed to have a great sense of what is happening in California
and the electricity markets, he indicated that many of his staff collegues
were not so up to speed.  Any way that we can help them out before their
minds are made up?

Jim


I gave you the wrong lot number... type in 1032 instead to get the Great
One.
I think 1031 is Haakan Loob.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Fildes, David
> Sent:	26 November 2001 18:00
> To:	'Jim Romeril'; 'Joslyn, Paul'; 'JBorle@atb.com'
> Cc:	'barry.tycholiz@enron.com'
> Subject:	how about a bid?
>
>
>
> Boys,
> I am bored today and have proof to show you...
> Go to this website and type in 1031 in the sale number field..
> It's a beauty and would be a fine addition to any collector's gallery.
> I would consider a joint venture with you for investment purposes on this
> find of a lifetime.
> Personally, I think it looks a little like a late 70's drummer but it is
> the Great One nonetheless.
> It is a fine specimen of the era ' Short on the sides, but keep the length
> in the back'
>
> http://www.auktionsverket.se/starte.htm
>
>
> PS- the price is about 25,000 swedish kroners which i think is about $5000
> Canadian


please print all
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 12/28/99 09:53
AM ---------------------------

Heather Kroll
12/28/99 08:49 AM
To: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, James B Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael L
Fredell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Cohagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Transaction Documents

---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT on 12/28/99 08:46
AM ---------------------------

"STEPHEN POLAKOFF" <SKPOLAKO@LLGM.COM> on 12/28/99 08:10:35 AM
To: Chris Gaffney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Allegretti/HOU/EES@EES, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, opagan@gateway.net, gnowak@sidley.com,
Mike.Coretto@uinet.com, tony.vallillo@uinet.com, cxb@wiggin.com,
LR1@wiggin.com, wcb@wiggin.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Transaction Documents

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 07:42:55 -0500
From: "John Klauberg (BARBARA MOTTER)" <BMOTTER@LLGM.COM>
To: CGaffne@enron.com,chris.gaffney@enron.com, dallegre@enron.com,
hkroll@enron.com, jader@enron.com, opagan@enron.com, opagon@gateway.net,
gnowak@sidley.com, mike.coretto@uinet.com, Tony.Vallillo@uinet.com,
cxb@wiggin.com, LR1@wiggin.com, wcb@wiggin.com
Cc: AJCHAMBE@LLGM.COM,JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM, SKPOLAKO@LLGM.COM, TMOORE@LLGM.COM
Subject: Transaction Documents
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_0C5551F0.E786CE7D"

Per Chris Gaffney's request, attached for your review are blacklines of all
of the transaction documents.  With respect to these "near final" drafts,
please note the following:  (i) the Enron Corp.  Guaranty and the form of UIL
Guaranty are being sent separately as well as part of the WPSA to highlight
changes made to those documents from the prior drafts (they will appear
completely underlined as Schedules to the WPSA); (ii) we have incorporated
much of the comments from Wiggin & Dana with respect to Section 2.2 of the
PPA Entitlements Transfer Agreement and Schedule 4 to the WPSA, but the new
text may still need some tinkering with, particularly since the retention of
the power entitlements by UI (coupled with the payment of the sale proceeds
to EPMI) required a flow through of some conforming changes throughout the
PETA; and (iii) the attached side letter relating to the RESCO Power pricing
has not been reviewed by Enron as of this e-mail.  If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to contact Stephen Polakoff at 212-424-8350.

 - #439609 vRED - WPSA Current.rtf
 - #315263 vRED - Enron Corp Guaranty under WPSA.wpd
 - #315380 vRED - UIL Guaranty under WPSA.wpd
 - #315918 vRED - LOOK FORWARD NUCLEAR AGREEMENT.wpd
 - #316115 vRED - LETTER AGREEMENT TO UI AND ENRON.wpd
 - #316814 v1 - Side letter re RESCO.wpd
 - #281430 vRED - PPA Entitlements Transfer Agreement.wpd


I am going to invite Denis and Lynne and the Sheas to watch football on
October 22 when you guys are all hopefully there too for John Kartozian's
birthday party.

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


As you may know, Transwestern and Northern entered into "corporate separateness" agreements as part of the recently completed $1 billion secured financing.  The gist of those agreements is that the ETS family of companies is subject to new restrictions on their interaction with the rest of Enron.  To assure compliance with these new obligations, I'd like to remove ETS personel from the OPI structure.  I don't have the full slate of officers and directors in front of me, but I do recall that Dave Neubauer took my old job as OPI president, and I believe Mary Kay Miller and several other ETS folks are still officers and/or directors.  Please give me a call at your earliest convenience to discuss.  Thanks.  DF


I understand.  Please make appropriate arrangements with your team members.

Mukesh

Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com on 01/29/2001 10:34:46 AM

To:   Mukesh_Bajaj@LECG.com
cc:
Subject:  E234

Greetings Professor.

Regrettably, I'm on travel in New York City today and can't make it to
class this evening.  I don't anticipate having to miss any other classes
this semester.

Regards,
Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000
05:37 PM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 05/14/2000 08:03:36 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Book and EPRM articles

Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-za05.mx.aol.com (rly-za05.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.101])
by air-za03.mail.aol.com (v70.20) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:48:23 -0400
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
rly-za05.mx.aol.com (v71.10) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:48:03 -0400
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id QAA14355 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 16:48:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/corp-1.03) with ESMTP id QAA06854 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 16:47:59 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from notes.ect.enron.com (ecthou_gt2.corp.enron.com [172.16.4.33])
by dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA19444 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 16:48:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))
id 862568C8.0077C120 ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 16:48:02 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT
From: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Message-ID: <862568C8.0077BFB4.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 16:47:55 -0500
Subject: Book and EPRM articles
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: Unknown

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/21/2000
04:49
PM ---------------------------

"Chris Strickland" <chris@lacima.co.uk> on 04/20/2000 04:32:32 AM

Please respond to "Chris Strickland" <chris@lacima.co.uk>

To:   "VinceJKaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:   "Julie" <julie@lacima.co.uk>
Subject:  Book and EPRM articles

Hi Vince,

I was wondering how the chapter of the book is coming along??! Do you want  me
to make 'noise' tomorrow or to leave you until after Easter?

Until then, I wanted to discuss with you an idea  that Les and I have been
throwing around concerning writing a series of articles  for Risk's 'Energy
and
Power Risk Management'. We would like to propose to  them?that we would write
an
article a month, covering practical issues  dealing with energy modelling and
energy derivative pricing and risk management.  The articles would be based
upon
sections of the book so as to promote the book,  and to reduce the effort/time
involved by using?already produced material.  We would like to cover some very
practical topics, but we?won't be giving  too much away as the articles are
only
1 or 2 pages long.

Each article would be of?the  form;

- introduce?the concept
- give an example using real data
- discuss the problem with a case study
- provide a discussion
- sum up

I've included a list of potential articles at the  end of this e-mail. For
example, for the first one,  "Estimation of mean reversion in spot energy
prices", we would introduce  the concept of mean reversion,?show a graph of an
equity index and an  energy price?for illustration of our point, estimate the
parameter for a  series of energies over a number of seasons, and finally,
discuss the  results.

We?are wondering if you would like to be  involved in this project? Your
involvement needn't take much time (although it  is up to you). The kind of
input we are hoping for (again, this is up to you) is  that you?would?review
the
list of articles and  provide?suggestions of additions or deletions, suggest
reasonable data sets  or case studies to work with on each article, and then
to
run your eye over  "near finished" articles, which?we would supply to you for
your?practical experience?input.? Would something like this  interest you? If
it
did, we would try to sell Risk on making it a regular  monthly "feature" of
EPRM, authored by all three of us.

We are hoping to present our proposal to Risk in  the next few weeks, so
please
let us know if you are interested.

Best regards.

Chris.

Potental EPRM articles;

1- Estimation of mean reversion in spot energy  prices (with parameters
estimated for oil, gas, and electricity data over  different seasons)

2- Estimation of jumps in spot energy prices (with  parameters estimated for
oil, gas, and electricity data over different  seasons)

3- Simulating a mean reverting spot price process  for pricing energy
derivatives (with case study applied to an Asian option on  oil)

4- Simulating a jump / diffusion spot price process  for pricing energy
derivatives (with case study applied to a Swaption on natural  gas)

5- Simulating a mean reverting jump / diffusion  spot price process for
pricing
energy derivatives (with case study applied to  hourly caps on spot
electricity)

6- An analytical pricing formula for pricing caps  in a mean reverting spot
price model (with example applied to a cap on natural  gas fitting the Forward
curve and volatlity structure)

7- using a tree consistent with the forward curve  and vols for pricing swing
options

8- implying a single?factor vol function from  market Futures option prices
and
variation of parameters thru time

9- adding jump volatility to the tree

10- An analytical pricing formula for pricing caps  in a multi-factor forward
curve model(with example applied to the same cap on  natural gas and a
discussion on the differences between the two  approaches)

11- Estimating volatility functions for  multi-factor forward curve models
(with
estimates of oil data over different  periods)

12- Estimating volatility functions for  multi-factor forward curve model from
market option prices

13- pricing swing option in multi factor model  using tree for exercise
strategy

14- comparison of VaR methodoligies applied to the  same energy derivativ
portfolio.


Per the email below, it appears to me physical gas should be traded only
under Nicor Gas Company and financial through the dba.  Do you agree?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000 04:21 PM -----

	Adnan Patel@ENRON
	08/17/2000 04:20 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Linda S
Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Northern Illinois Gas Company/Nicor Gas Company

Per my conversation with Nicor Gas Company's attorney, Northern Illinois Gas
Company changed its name to Nicor Gas Company. Therefore, Nicor Gas Company
is the only entity that all the deals needs to be booked under. However, the
attorney also agreed to the fact that they do use the name "Northern Illinois
Gas Company d/b/a Nicor Gas Company" eversince the name change happened. He
said they had been using both names "contractually" and interchangeably even
though it is all just ONE company, one state registered company.

I'm currently waiting on name change documents, however this is what it looks
like thats going to happen:
The main HQ company would end up being NICOR GAS COMPANY with all the
trades/contracts/deals being merged into one record. However, if need be we
could have a Tradename set up as "Northern Illinois Gas Company d/b/a Nicor
Gas Company" since this is how the company does business as, in some cases.

Nicor's legal Dept could be reached at (630) 983-8676 for any further
clarifications in this matter.

Adnan Patel
Global Counterparty
x58335

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 08/17/2000 03:47 PM
To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan
Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Northern Illinois Gas Company/Nicor Gas Company

There appears to be confusion over who and what products we should be trading
with these entities.

We have an ISDA Master Agreement in place with Northern Illinois Gas Company
d/b/a Nicor Gas Company.  This is a new master.  If the counterparty is not
set up this way it need to be.

Physical gas has a master in place with Northern Illinois Gas Company.

There is no master agreement in place with Nicor Gas Company and the only
trading being done with this entity is online gas trading.

The issue that needs to be resolved is whether we want to trade gas under
both Northern Illinois Gas Company and Nicor Gas Company.  Frank Davis will
resolve this issue with Tom Moran in Credit and Stacy Dickson with physical
gas Legal, and they will let us know who we should be trading with.

When we hear back from them we can finally resolve what counterparty names we
want to set up and get back to the counterparty if we have not received the
correct Password Application to match out intended trading partners.

Sorry for all the confusion this is causing.  I am confused too.


Amy has additional questions from John Koomey:

1.	Can we change the wording in Section 3.a to "$2,500.00 per one-day course, plus the actual price of course books...

2.	Can we delete the last sentence in Section 3b? (Examples of acceptable forms...)

3.	Does Section 5 mean Koomey can present his (math and calculation class) to other companies as long as he does not refer to Enron, does not use Enron teaching examples, and does not use use / disclose any Enron-specific information?

	Thanks.... I'm printing these questions and I have pulled the Agreement for you to look at.


Tana,

  There is a problem.  We do not have the correct Qos for the STM- 1 for a UK
deal.  Marie will call you.

Robbi Rossi
Sr. Counsel
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 345-7268
Fax:  (713) 646-8537


Rosco was in for his shots today.  On Feb 3 he weighed 14.6 lbs.  He now
weighs 27 lbs.  His paws look too big and his head is too small.

What an adventure!

ckm


Sally,
We can offer the Director Level &Impact and Influence8  course to all of your
Directors as part of a pilot program.    I wanted to know if you want me to
forward this offer to them.   Please let me know.
Hgm


Have a Happy and Safe Holiday...


The following is a test of our new List Serve.  Please reply if you receive
this email.

Bruce Andrews
Quinn Gillespie & Associates
1133 Connecticut Ave., NW
Fifth Floor
Washington, DC 20036
direct dial: (202) 429-4006
QGA Main Line: (202) 457-1110
QGA fax: (202) 457-1130
bandrews@quinngillespie.com


Tara and Matt,

Following is list of error message for west pl 6/04/2001 - 6/05/2001 as of this morning --

Pipeline Name		Msg_Received_DTM		Msg_Desc			Status
----------------------		------------------------------------	--------------------------		-----------------------------------
N/A			N/A				N/A				N/A

Eddie


Good morning, Mike.  What time is the meeting?

Rosie

To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: EGM - all company meeting

Ken,

Per my voicemail, we are having an all employee meeting on next Monday at the
Hyatt Regency.  The purpose of this meeting is to pull everyone together for
an update on EGM and a brief presentation from all the business units within
EGM.  This includes about 1 hour of business and then drinks and food - we
expect about 500 people.

We have made a lot of progress on changing the nature and profitability of
these businesses and we want to make sure everyone sees just how far we have
come in a few months.

I believe they will be motivated to see the growth and profitability.  We had
a record Q1 with $100 million of gross margin.  That was 50% of what they
made in all of 2000.  Combined with the fact that in December of 2000 alone
we made $87 million in gross margin, I believe it will have a big impact.

If you could attend the meeting even for a few minutes it would go a long way
in helping us drive our other point which is that the EGM businesses are now
core to Enron and has the attention of both you and Jeff.

Thanks for considering this and let me know if you need any other information
or assistance.

Mike


FYI.

Jim
---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 07/11/2000
10:25 AM ---------------------------

Susan J Mara
07/11/2000 09:43 AM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES,
Elsa Piekielniak/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott Vonderheide/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Reuters -- Calif. ISO may vote again on power price cap cut

Oh, Lord!  We have to keep the pressure on -- particularly what a bad idea it
is to lower price caps in times of resource shortage. Do we have a Jimmie
Carter analogy we can use?
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 07/11/2000 09:39
AM ---------------------------

"Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com> on 07/11/2000 07:49:39 AM
To: "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>, <smara@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Reuters -- Calif. ISO may vote again on power price cap cut

FYI

Calif. ISO may vote again on power price cap cut

     LOS ANGELES, July 10 (Reuters) - The California Independent System
Operator (ISO) Board of Governors may try for a third time to pass a motion
to cut a cap on power prices to $250 per megawatt hour (MWh) from its current
$500 per MWh.

     "It wouldn't surprise me if in the next few days there is a request to
add it to the August 1 agenda," a member of the ISO Board of Governors said
on Monday.

     The California ISO operates most of the state's power grid.

     Last week its governing board voted by 12 votes to nine, with one
abstention, in favor of lowering the cap but failed to secure the 13 votes
necessary to pass under the motion under ISO rules.

     The previous week a vote to cut the cap to $250 per MWh failed to pass
after a 12-12 vote but a new meeting was called after one member, Marcie
Edwards of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, declared she had
incorrectly cast her vote against the lower cap.

     Two members were absent overseas during last week's vote. One, John
McGuire of Silicon Valley Power, had supported the cut to $250 at the June 28
vote. He is due to return from vacation on July 26.

     The other absent member, Daniel Kirschner of the Environmental Defense
Fund, is due to return from overseas during the next couple of days, sources
said.

     It was not clear which way Kirschner is likely to vote as he was also
absent from the June 28 vote. The board at 25 members on the June 28 vote,
but one member resigned before the subsequent vote.

     Pressure to cut the cap has come from several sources including state
Sen. Steve Peace, whose San Diego constituents have been angered by sharply
higher electricity bills recently.

     Under rules governing the deregulation of the state's power industry
customers of San Diego Gas and Electric are currently the only ones exposed
to market prices.

     "He (Peace) is getting all kinds of hate mail and is really trying to do
something," an industry source said.

     San Diego Gas and Electric is a unit of Sempra Energy .

     Rates for customers of California's other two investor owned utilities,
Edison International's Southern California Edison and PG&E Corp.'s Pacific
Gas and Electric, are currently frozen.

     Other proponents of cutting the cap including Loretta Lynch, president
of the California Public Utilities Commission and a close aide to Governor
Gray Davis.

     San Diego Gas and Electric has called an emergency summit of energy
market participants -- including power generators, energy service providers
and representatives of the California Independent System Operator and
California Power Exchange - on Wednesday to explore solutions to the soaring
prices.

     Supporters of cutting the cap believe the power market is not "workably
competitive" and prices rose to excessive levels during a recent heatwave,
putting an unfair burden on both ratepayers and shareholders of investor
owned utilities.

     Opponents are led by independent power producers who have argued a lower
cap could make it more difficult for the state to import power at times of
shortage.


Jim:  To say that there was gaming in the UK pool is a significant
understatement.  Couple thoughts...I'm pretty sure that Seab has done
extensive analysis on the UK and he'd likely therefore be very useful in
developing rebuttal. (Though very close to it at one point, I've been removed
for a few years.)  Also, Schroeder and his gang could also likely shed some
insights, and seems that Schroeder's pretty close now with Littlechild---that
might be another avenue for information to rebut.

Best,
Jeff


The NA/Nordic  Chemical Market Pulp - Executive report for October 2001
 is now available on Economics Online. www.pppc.org/econ/ in section Monthly
Executive Reports (PDF format) -  Market Pulp

Should you have any questions concerning the content of this report, please
do not hesitate to contact Joey Ducharme, at (514) 861-8849 or by e-mail at
jducharme@pppc.org.

For questions or comments concerning Economics Online, please contact:

Doreen Olkowicz
Manager, Statistics and Online Services
T (514) 861-8851    F (514) 866-4863    E-mail  dolkowicz@pppc.org


This book request is complete.  Please call me should you have any questions or concerns.

Have a great evening.

Zakiyyah McClure
xt 58146

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Trevino, Susan
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 2:03 PM
To:	McClure, Zakiyyah
Cc:	McIntyre, Burton; Velasco, Jennifer
Subject:	FW: Criteria for Power Books

Zakiyyah - in response to your email below, please set this book up in RisktRAC as a power book.  Apparently this book has already been set up in GCP and you mentioned below that it is also set up in ERMS.  I don't know why it was set up in ERMS since it's a power book but make sure to mention this to the GCP team.  Also, make sure to place this book in the hierarchy under AGG-ACCRUALS.  Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 1:45 PM
To:	Trevino, Susan
Subject:	RE: Criteria for Power Books

Long Name:			Texas-Plant
ERMS Short Name:		Texas-Plant
Power Portfolio:		Plant Desk
Power Sub-portfolio: 		Plant Desk
Traders:			Doug Gilbert-Smith
				Kevin Presto
Sub-to-Legal Relationship: 	EPMI
EnPower Link:		Power Desk - Houston

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Trevino, Susan
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 1:31 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE: Criteria for Power Books

Apparently this book was not set up in RisktRAC.  Please fill out the criteria form below and I will set this book up immediately.

Thanks,
Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 1:07 PM
To:	Trevino, Susan
Subject:	RE: Criteria for Power Books

The long and short name for the book is Texas-Plant.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Trevino, Susan
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 11:22 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Cc:	Abel, Chris; Considine, Keith; McClure, Zakiyyah; McIntyre, Burton; Velasco, Jennifer; Victorio, Tom
Subject:	FW: Criteria for Power Books

Stacey,

In your message below you mentioned that this book is already set up in GCP.  Please provide the short name so that further research can be done.  Contact me if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McClure, Zakiyyah
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 9:28 AM
To:	Trevino, Susan
Cc:	McIntyre, Burton; Velasco, Jennifer; Victorio, Tom
Subject:	FW: Criteria for Power Books

Susan,

This emails relates to your email of last Thursday asking us to create this accrual book.  When you have some time, let's discuss this one.  I looked in Risktrac and this one is not there, but it is in ERMS.  How does this happen?  Should this book be placed in the AGG Accruals hierarchy?

Please advise. I will hold off on adding anything until we can discuss.

Thank you.

Zakiyyah

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 6:07 PM
To:	McClure, Zakiyyah
Cc:	McIntyre, Burton
Subject:	RE: Criteria for Power Books

The book I requested is actually already set up in GCP.  I looked for it on the Active/Inactive website and could not find it, so I assumed it was not in RisktRAC.  This book just needs to be added to the Accrual Hierarchy in RisktRAC.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McClure, Zakiyyah
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 3:11 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Cc:	McIntyre, Burton
Subject:	FW: Criteria for Power Books
Importance:	High

Stacey,

I did leave a message with someone at your desk.  Please complete the following information so that we will be able to set up your power book.  As well, when will you have positions in this book?

Thank you.

Zakiyyah McClure
xt 58146
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Velasco, Jennifer
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:49 PM
To:	McClure, Zakiyyah
Subject:	FW: Criteria for Power Books
Importance:	High

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Trevino, Susan
Sent:	Monday, June 04, 2001 5:03 PM
To:	Best, John
Cc:	Schott, Samuel; Velasco, Jennifer
Subject:	Criteria for Power Books
Importance:	High

Criteria needed for GCP setup for each new Power Book / Desk:

Long Name:			?
ERMS Short Name:		? (15 character limit in CAPS, without spaces - - dashes permitted)
Power Portfolio:		?
Power Sub-portfolio: 		?
Traders:			?
Sub-to-Legal Relationship: 	? (EPMI for East & West Desks)
EnPower Link:		? (Power Desk - Houston for East & West Desks)


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Andrew  . Edison
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Cellular
Report Total: $77.92
Amount Due Employee: $77.92

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Dear Mr. LARRY CAMPBELL:

Thank you for your order.

You sold 162 shares of JNPR (Juniper Networks Inc Com) at 164.000000.

ORDER DETAILS:
The tracking number for this order is: B-600-AATR-3150
Order entered at:                      12:12:55 on 12/12/00
Order processing began at:             12:12:56
Order executed at:                     12:13:06 on 12/12/00

ACCOUNT DETAILS:
Time and Date: 12:13:05 on 12/12/00
Your position in JNPR is 113 shares
Your real cash total is $8,567.95

You will receive a printed Datek Online confirmation by postal mail, or by
electronic delivery if you are subscribed to that service.

Questions regarding this transaction? Contact our Customer Support department
by e-mailing support@datek.com. Please reference the order tracking number.


See you then.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001 10:48 AM -----

	Robert B Cass
	03/09/2001 10:43 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT,
Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT, Shifali
Sharma/NA/Enron
		 cc: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: URGENT REQUEST: PLEASE REVIEW AND APPROVE NEW PRODUCT TYPE
(ENRONONLINE)

Your review and approval of the following product type in the EOL Datamanager
is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for approval at the
bottom of this e-mail). If you have any questions please call me at ext.
35491.

Please do not approve product types in Datamanager between 7:30 - 10:00 am.
Please grant approval no later than 12:00 noon on March 14, 2001.

Trader: Robert Fuller

New Product Type:   US Crude WTI Phy Exchange (Platts Indexed Commodities)

EXAMPLE:

US WTI Phy Exch  Platts WTI / ANS        Month/Yr           USD/bbl

Product Type Long descripton:
A US Crude Transaction with Enron Reserve Acquisition Corp. (ERAC), under
which (A) where ERAC is the Buyer,  ERAC shall sell and deliver  to
Counterparty and Counterparty  shall purchase and receive a quantity of West
Texas Intermediate crude oil deemed gravity 40 API ("WTI") at Cushing,
Oklahoma U.S.A. TEPPCO Crude Pipeline, L.P. ("Cushing") equal to the volume
submitted by the Counterparty via the Website for delivery during the term of
the Transaction, and  Counterparty shall sell and deliver to ERAC and ERAC
shall purchase and receive the same volume of Exchange Product in equal parts
for delivery during the term of the Transaction; and, (B) where ERAC is the
Seller, Counterparty shall sell and deliver to ERAC and ERAC shall purchase
and receive  a quantity of WTI at Cushing equal to the volume submitted by
the Counterparty via the Website for delivery during the term of the
Transaction, and ERAC shall sell and deliver  to Counterparty and
Counterparty shall purchase and receive the same volume of Exchange Product
in equal parts  for delivery during the term of the Transaction.  The price
for WTI shall be the midpoint of the daily first line quotations for
(WTI/(MONTH) under the heading "U.S. $/Bbl" in the Crude Price Assessments
section of Platt's Oilgram Price Report for the issue of publication on the
date of the Transaction ("Index Price").  The price for Exchange Product
shall equal (i) the Index Price, plus (ii) the Adjusted Price.  The Bid Price
represents the Adjusted  Price for Exchange Product  under Section A above.
The Offer Price represents the Adjusted Price for Exchange Product  under
Section B above.

Term of the Product:
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date to the
Termination Date. The Effective Date is {DATE}.   The Termination Date is
{DATE}.

Location of the Example Product:
The delivery of Alaskan North Slope ("Exchange Product") shall be at Long
Beach, California.

Currency:
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.

UOM:
The unit of measure in which the price is quoted is in Barrels per day and
the quantity shown shall be in Barrels per day.

==============================================================================
=====

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


I got your message.  They just got my phone and computer hooked-up (I'm on 39 now).  Can you get together tomorrow?  How about 10:00?  Let me know.

Thanks,
Lindy