Dear Enron Employee:

Houston Ballet is presenting The Nutcracker through Sunday, December 30.  The production has been hailed by the Houston chronicle as "the crown jewel of holiday entertainment," and is a perfect introduction to the world of ballet for families and audiences of all ages.  Enron has been a long-time supporter of the Ballet, and we would like to thank you with a special invitation from Houston Ballet and TicketMaster for discount tickets to The Nutcracker.

Click on the following links below to receive a 25% discount on tickets to any of the selected performances of The Nutcracker.

To place your order, click on the link below to choose your day and time.  When requesting your tickets, you may choose from best available seats or a specific section, however, all ticket prices may not be available.  Ticketmaster service and handling charges will apply to your order.

Your company code is: NUT1.

Happy Holidays and enjoy Houston Ballet.

Performance Dates and Times:

Wednesday, December 26 at 7:30pm
https://ticketing.ticketmaster.com/cgi/purchasePage.asp?event_id=C003345C3DE86FB&event_code=EHL1226

Thursday, December 27 at 7:30pm
https://ticketing.ticketmaster.com/cgi/purchasePage.asp?event_id=C003345D10FB243&event_code=EHL1227

Saturday, December 29 at 2:00pm
https://ticketing.ticketmaster.com/cgi/purchasePage.asp?event_id=C003345CDB2A7A1&event_code=EHL1229M

Sunday, December 30 at 2:00pm
https://ticketing.ticketmaster.com/cgi/purchasePage.asp?event_id=C003345CDDBA7F9&event_code=EHL1230M


Attached is the real audio files from the above CERA conference for your review.  All indications are that government and industry will be working closer with possible real time reporting requirements to manage any impact to the flow of oil in America much like what was setup during world war II.

CERA Chairman Daniel Yergin hosted a presentation by US Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham, at which the Secretary spoke on US energy policy and the legislative implications of the war on terrorism.

The importance of energy security strategy has certainly been raised, and Secretary Abraham spoke about actions by both industry and government to adapt to this new environment. He also noted requests from President Bush and Senate Majority Leader Daschle to the US Senate to enact a new US energy strategy. Finally, Secretary Abraham described his agency's efforts to improve communication between government and industry decision makers in this period of bipartisanship and heightened focus on energy security.

	CERA Chairman Daniel Yergin introduces U.S. Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham. [duration: 2:23]

	U.S. Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham touches on recent key issues facing the U.S. energy policy following the 	events of September 11. [duration: 20:50]

	CERA Chairman Daniel Yergin briefly summarizes some of the key points discussed by Secretary of Energy Abraham. 	[duration: 4:51]

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 9:40 AM
To:	Will, Lloyd; Imai, Rika
Subject:	FW: US Energy Secretary Conference Call

Please participate and give group overview.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Suarez, John" <John_Suarez@ENRON.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:29 PM
To:	kevin.presto@enron.com
Subject:	Fw: US Energy Secretary Conference Call

FYI

John D. Suarez
Enron Broadband Services
(713) 853-5267 work
(713) 443-5267 mobile
(877) 597-0646 pager
email: john.suarez@enron.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Yergin <danielyergin@CERA.com>
Sent: Thu Oct 11 15:31:25 2001
Subject: US Energy Secretary Conference Call

From: Daniel Yergin, Chairman, Cambridge Energy Research Associates

Re: US Energy Secretary -- CERA Client Briefing

I wanted to be sure you were aware that U.S. Energy Secretary Spencer
Abraham is delivering an exclusive telephone briefing to CERA's Global
Energy clients on Friday, October 12 at 11:00am eastern time on "US
Energy Policy: What's Ahead." I will be chairing this call.

This is a unique opportunity for you to hear directly the Secretary's
views on U.S. energy policy post the September 11 crisis.

I hope you will be able to join us.

Sincerely,

Daniel Yergin

To enroll, please contact Kathleen Doherty via e-mail at +617 498 9194
before 10am eastern time Friday, October 12.

To participate in the call, please call in on one of the following
numbers approximately 10-15 minutes before the call:

Within the United States:  1-888-695-0612
Outside the United States:  (719) 457-2663
Confirmation code:  506303
Title of the call:  CERA Call

Playback
Via CERA.com
A recording of this call will be posted in the Global Energy section on
CERA.com. Details will be made available following the call on Monday,
October 15.

Via Telephone
In addition, you will be able to access the replay via telephone by
calling 1-888-203-1112  (within the U.S.) or (719) 457-0820 outside the
U.S.). Please use confirmation number 506303 to access the playback.
This version of the call will be available until November 12, 2001.


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000
01:48 PM ---------------------------

bchen@newenergy.com (Bill Chen) on 12/08/2000 12:13:42 PM
To: arm@phaser.com, jleslie@luce.com
cc:

Subject: Dec. 7 - SDG&E Press Release

CRECers,

Note attached SDG&E press release calling on Governor Davis to use his
emergency powers to remedy the accelerating energy crisis by taking a
number of actions, e.g., directing local air districts to temporarily lift
emissions limits for in-state power plants so that the plants which have
met or exceeded their air-emissions limits can run.  In addition, SDG&E
reported it made an emergency filing with FERC requesting an immediate
reinstatement of price caps on interstate natural gas pipeline
transportation to the CA border.

Bill

 - Sempra PR.doc


Attached please find the execution copy of the Fountain Valley/ABB
Facility Agreement (the second document below), which includes the
changes to Exhibits A and S, as well as a blackline showing changes made
to the version circulated yesterday.  The date of execution is still
open.
 <<CRO- Fountain Valley/ABB Facility Agreement  Versions 4 to 5.DOC>>
<<Fountain Valley/ABB Facility Agreement - Version 5.DOC>>
 - ABB Facility Agreement  Versions 4 to 5.DOC
 - ABB Facility Agreement - Version 5.DOC


Sally, Congratulations.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron on 01/17/2000
09:07 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Rick Causey                           01/17/2000 06:04 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:

Subject: Global Risk Management Operations

Recognizing Enron,s increasing worldwide presence in the wholesale energy
business and the need to insure outstanding internal controls for all of our
risk management activities, regardless of location, a global risk management
operations function has been created under the direction of Sally W. Beck,
Vice President.  In this role, Sally will report to Rick Causey, Executive
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer.

Sally,s responsibilities with regard to Global Risk Management Operations
will mirror those of other recently created Enron global functions.  In this
role, Sally will work closely with all Enron geographic regions and wholesale
companies to insure that each entity receives individualized regional support
while also focusing on the following global responsibilities:

1. Enhance communication among risk management operations professionals.
2. Assure the proliferation of best operational practices around the globe.
3. Facilitate the allocation of human resources.
4. Provide training for risk management operations personnel.
5. Coordinate user requirements for shared operational systems.
6. Oversee the creation of a global internal control audit plan for risk
management activities.
7. Establish procedures for opening new risk management operations offices
and create key benchmarks for measuring on-going risk controls.

Each regional operations team will continue its direct reporting relationship
within its business unit, and will collaborate with Sally in the delivery of
these critical items. The Houston-based risk management operations team under
Sue Frusco,s leadership, which currently supports risk management activities
for South America and Australia, will also report directly to Sally.

Sally retains her role as Vice President of  Energy Operations for Enron
North America, reporting to the ENA Office of the Chairman.  She has been in
her current role over Energy Operations since 1997, where she manages risk
consolidation and reporting, risk management administration, physical product
delivery, confirmations and cash management for ENA,s physical commodity
trading, energy derivatives trading and financial products trading.

Sally has been with Enron since 1992, when she joined the company as a
manager in Global Credit.  Prior to joining Enron,  Sally had four years
experience as a commercial banker and spent seven years as a registered
securities principal with a regional investment banking firm.  She also owned
and managed a retail business for several years.

Please join me in supporting Sally in this additional coordination role for
global risk management operations.


i've realized i'm too old to stay up til 1 on a school night


Steve,

I added a couple of sub-headings to help clarify the document.

Jeff


Thanks for your part in making this happen!
---------------------- Forwarded by Sue Frusco/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/20/2000 08:32 AM ---------------------------

Heidi Mason
03/19/2000 10:53 PM
To: Cassandra Schultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue
Frusco/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: AUSTRALIA COMPLETES FIRST ENRONONLINE TRADE

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Heidi Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
20/03/2000 14:54 ---------------------------

Paul Quilkey
20/03/2000 12:40
To: Louise Kitchen@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, EI-Australia

Subject: AUSTRALIA COMPLETES FIRST ENRONONLINE TRADE

Enron Australia executed its first EnronOnline trade at 12.31PM today, Monday
20 March.

Details of the transaction as follows:

 Seller: Duke Energy Australia Trading
 Term: May 00 VIC Peak

Congratulations to everyone!


Teco Tap       30.000 / Enron ; 90.000 / HPL IFERC

LS HPL LSK IC       30.000 / Enron


Calif DWR Seen Asking PUC To Order 25% Rate Increase Fri
By Jason Leopold

07/13/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
(This article was originally published earlier Friday.)

LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- The California Department of Water Resources, the
agency purchasing a bulk of the state's power needs in lieu of the three
investor-owned utilities, is expected to tell state regulators Friday that
they need to increase electricity rates by as much as 25%.

This is because there are insufficient funds in the current revenue stream
to cover a $13.4 billion bond sale, three commissioners with the Public
Utilities Commission told Dow Jones Newswires late Thursday.

PUC President Loretta Lynch is expected to issue a draft decision Friday
either endorsing the rate hike request or calling for an audit of the DWR's
current revenue stream before she makes a decision, aides in her office
said.

If the PUC determines that there are not enough funds in the current rate
structure to cover the bond sale, it will have no choice but to order the
rate increase, according to the legislation that put the state in the power
buying business.

Businesses are expected to bear most of the burden of the rate increase,
the second in just two months, if approved by the PUC, the commissioners
said.
"Back in May when we ordered the first rate increase, we said we may be
forced to do it again by the summer," one commissioner said.

"It's unfortunate, but it shouldn't be a shock to anyone. The state has
made an enormous commitment to Wall Street that rates would go up whenever
it's needed to ensure there is enough money to pay off those bonds."

Lynch and a spokesman for the DWR were unavailable for comment late
Thursday.

Separately, Assembly Speaker Pro Tem Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek, has
drafted a proposal expected to be introduced into the Assembly Friday or
Saturday that would have large businesses using the most electricity to
finance the bulk of the $43 billion in long-term power supply contracts,
aides in his office said.
Moreover, Keeley's plan is aimed at reducing rates for consumers who use
the least amount of power. Details of the plan are still sketchy, aides
said.

Possible Rate Hike To Generate $2.5B Yearly For State

The 50% rate increase ordered in May is expected to generate $5 billion
annually, and if the PUC orders a 25% increase, that is expected to
generate $2.5 billion. However, it is still unclear if that is enough, the
commissioners said.

Businesses are expected to bear most of the burden of the rate increase,
the second in four months, if approved by the PUC, the three commissioners
said.
Since January, the state has spent nearly $8.5 billion buying electricity
on behalf of customers of Edison International (EIX) unit Southern
California Edison, Sempra Energy (SRE) unit San Diego Gas & Electric and
PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit Pacific Gas & Electric.

The state has borrowed more than $7 billion from its general fund, which
must be repaid by ratepayers at 6% interest, to purchase power.

In addition, the state has locked itself into $43 billion in long-term
power supply contracts at high prices for as much as 20 years to ensure
there is enough power to meet demand. Future rate increases to finance the
contracts are likely, state officials have said.

But if the PUC orders another rate increase, the money won't benefit the
utilities, which have billions of dollars in power costs to recover.
Instead, it will be used to guarantee Wall Street financial institutions
that there is sufficient funds in the rate structure to allow $13.4 billion
in revenue bonds to be sold.

The bonds are expected to be sold in August or September, said state
Treasurer Phil Angelides.

The commissioners said the PUC and the DWR waited to address another rate
hike to see if state officials and generators were successful in coming to
terms on $8.9 billion the state says it was overcharged for power since
last year.

After two weeks of hearings between generators and a delegation of
California utility executives and energy officials, talks broke down
Monday. Generators offered the state $716 million in refunds, but Gov. Gray
Davis balked, threatening to sue to recover the full $8.9 billion.

Any refunds would have been disbursed to the utilities and the DWR, which
could have deferred the need for any rate increase, according to Steve
Maviglio, press secretary to Davis.

An administrative law judge with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
said Thursday he will recommend that the commission not order cash refunds
to California because the state's utilities owe far more money to the
generators than what he thinks the state is owed.

-By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com


Revised UAE Model
Ben


Kam,

Hey, there's a nymex sale of 5000 /day Dec at 2.945 that shows up as a changed deal in my P&L from last night.  The deal is a valid sale that I executed, but it does not appear to be valued correctly.  It's valued at $3,096 when nymex was marked at 2.735 so the value should have been $32,550.  I would contact Ashley directly, but I don't know her last name.  Thanks.

Mat


Hello! LAWYER DAGO has just sent you a greeting card from Bluemountain.com.

You can pick up your personal message here:

http://www3.bluemountain.com/cards/box4598y/c6z7r95ygbahkm.htm

Your card will be available for the next 90 days
This service is 100% FREE! :) Have a good day and have fun!

________________________________________________________________________
Accessing your card indicates agreement with Blue Mountain's Website Rules:
http://www.bluemountain.com/home/WebsiteRules.html

Send FREE Blue Mountain greeting cards to friends and family
http://www.bluemountain.com


Diann,
	I have got to get an update on the items below. Please send me your status on these items by close of business today.

									Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stokley, Chris
Sent:	Monday, July 23, 2001 3:23 PM
To:	Huddleson, Diann
Cc:	Frazier, Michael; Hart, Vivian; O'Neil, Murray P.; Ha, Kenny
Subject:	RE: CSC UPDATE

Diann,

	Do you have an update on the status of the other two items we discussed.

1)	CSC's ability to send all of our Calf. Customers files out to the FTP server as they do with the Energy Sense customers, along with the  timeline to get this implemented.
2)	The cost and timeline to put all of our customers into the Energy Sense website.

Chris
503-807-8959

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huddleson, Diann
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 2:59 PM
To:	Stokley, Chris
Cc:	Frazier, Michael; Hart, Vivian
Subject:	Re: CSC UPDATE

Vivian has regained access to the MDMA.    However, I need to control who has access so that we don't interfere with CSC's operation.  Let me know who will need access to this data.  Thanks.

From:	Chris Stokley/ENRON@enronXgate <mailto:Stokley/ENRON@enronXgate> on 07/19/2001 04:04 PM
To:	Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES <mailto:Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES>
cc:
Subject:	CSC UPDATE

Diann,

	I am flying back to Portland tomorrow morning at about 9:30 arriving at 12:00 Please call me at 503-807-8959 or e-mail me w/ and update on you talks w/ CSC. Thanks for your help.

									Chris Stokley


Forwarded at request of Joe Hillings:

---------------------- Forwarded by Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron on 12/10/99
12:03 PM ---------------------------

"Robert C. Fisher" <RCFisher@HillsandCo.Com> on 12/10/99 10:48:15 AM
To: Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: "Carla A. Hills" <CAHills@HillsandCo.com>, Erin Endean
<EMEndean@hillsandco.com>, "Edward A. Casey, Jr." <EACasey@HillsandCo.com>

Subject: WTO -- E-Commerce

Joe -- I had a conversation this morning with Jonathan McHale at USTR on
the status of E-commerce after Seattle.

McHale said that the E-commerce moratorium put in place by ministers in
May 1998 was schedule to run through the Third WTO Ministerial (i.e.
Seattle).  Since that Ministerial was suspended (and not formally
ended), the US view is that the moratorium is still in effect.

As to the work done in Seattle, McHale observed that the E-commerce
people had reached a fair degree of consensus on an extension of the
E-commerce moratorium, a work plan to look at the applicability of the
WTO's rules to E-commerce, and a commitment about not imposing
unnecessary regulations on E-commerce.  Since the Ministerial was
suspended, that progress is in limbo, and the US and other WTO members
are considering how best to proceed.

I asked him about the comments attributed the EU officials that the EU
would agree to an extension of the E-commerce moratorium only if other
countries agreed to the EU's assertion that all E-commerce falls under
the WTO services agreement (GATS).  He said that the US would never
agree to that, and that other countries shared the U.S. position.

As to next steps, he suggested that it would be important for companies
to go through the current WTO commitments and the UN's Central Product
Classification (CPC) code to make sure that whatever E-commerce
activities they are engaged in are covered.  I mentioned the work we are
doing on energy services, and he said the work in E-commerce in
analogous -- we should go through and see what services already are
covered, and let USTR know if we think that something we are doing is
not covered and needs to be brought into the service definitions.  In
other words, define who we are, what barriers we face (or what areas
need to be kept barrier free), and what our key issues and markets are.

As Enron considers what its interests are in E-commerce, you probably
will want to think both about the activities you are directly engaged
in, and those activities your customers are engaged in.  For example,
the benefits of having the pipeline (i.e. bandwidth) unencumbered by
tariffs or unnecessary regulations would be limited if the products
delivered over the pipeline were subject to significant restrictions.

McHale was very open, and I expect he would be pleased to meet with
Enron if you wanted to get into a more detailed discussion of the issue.

Regards -- Bob


Done

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 11:06 AM
To:	Poston, David
Cc:	Postlethwaite, John
Subject:	RE: New Pub Codes for Enpower

The risk group should be able to help you coordinate this request.

Stacey White

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Poston, David
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 10:39 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Cc:	Richter, Jeff
Subject:	New Pub Codes for Enpower

Good Morning Stacey,

Jeff Richter wants to start trading ancillary service deals through EOL.  To help facilitate this new business, we need to setup several new pub codes that represent the indexes the California ISO publishes for ancillary services.  A few of the ancillary pub codes are already setup we just need to add the ones for spin & non-spin.  Do you know who we need to get with to have these new pub codes setup?  I will work with the IT guys to ensure the programs that scrape the ISO site and store the prices are updated to capture these new indexes.

Thanks,  David Poston

ps - Please give me a call if you have any questions, 57834

These pub codes already exist:

ISOGRRNP15	(CAL ISO GENERATION REPLACEMENT RESERVE @ NP-15)
ISOLRRNP15	(CAL ISO LOAD REPLACEMENT RESERVE @ NP-15)

Repeat for SP-15

Repeat for ZP-26

These pub codes need to be created:

ISOGSRNP15	(CAL ISO GENERATION SPINNING RESERVE @ NP-15)
ISOLSRNP15	(CAL ISO LOAD REPLACEMENT RESERVE @ NP-15)

Repeat for SP-15

Repeat for ZP-26

ISOGNRNP15	(CAL ISO GENERATION NON-SPINNING RESERVE @ NP-15)
ISOLNRNP15	(CAL ISO LOAD NON-SPINNING RESERVE @ NP-15

Repeat for SP-15

Repeat for ZP-26


Thanks a lot for managing this!

-----Original Message-----
From: Palmer, Lizzette
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 10:19 AM
To: Cash, Michelle
Subject: position statements

Mike Muskat called me back this morning.  I've passed along my comments and changes.  He will send a revised version today for your review next.

Lizzette


Thanks, Jeff.  I will get you more info for you and your team in early November.  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Sent:	Friday, October  19, 2001 1:04 PM
To:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	FW: Names Needed for Golf Tournament

Golf Tournament names for gas risk management

Jeff Gossett	x37306		Hcp: 10
Errol Mclaughlin	x58274		Hcp: 36
O'neal Winfree	x39686		Hcp: 36
Kam Keiser	x35781		Hcp: 36

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hall, Bob M
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:46 PM
To:	Superty, Robert; Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	FW: Names Needed for Golf Tournament

Can you please provide info to Sally.

thanks

bob

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beck, Sally
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:45 PM
To:	Sweeney, Kevin; Apollo, Beth; Hall, Bob M; Price, Brent A.
Cc:	Craig, Braedi; Carrizales, Blanca; Choate, Heather; Valdez, Christina
Subject:	Names Needed for Golf Tournament

RE:  Golf Tournament at Ravenaux Country Club, Monday, November 19th
        11:00 am Registration and Range Balls; 12:00 Noon Shotgun Start

Please send me the list players for each foursome, along with their handicaps and phone numbers by Friday this week?   Thanks.

Will provide more information for all players prior to tournament.

Foursomes

Beth Apollo (2):  EES and Global Services

Brent Price (1)

Kevin Sweeney (1)

Bob Hall (2):  Risk and Logistics

Chantelle:  Brent has given me names of players for his foursome - Brent, Scott Earnest; John Swinney and Frank Prejean.  Can you get handicaps and phone numbers (Enron) for me?  Thanks.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2001 11:33 AM -----

	Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	01/17/2001 10:22 AM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Troubleshooting issue re: Cargill-Alliant Confirmation

Tana, in light of your instructions that we not work on confirmations until
"confirm training" is complete, I am asking you to help resolve a problem
brought to my attention by Mara Alexander at Cargill re: a confirm.  I had
not worked on the confirm so this is the first time I am hearing about the
issue.

As per Mara's fax, a copy of which I am forwarding to you, a confirmation was
sent on Jan. 12th for a trade done on the 11th.  Although there is an ISDA
pending for Cargill-Alliant, the Confirm that was sent does not, according to
Mara, reference the pending ISDA.

Please let me know if you can help resolve this.  I have meetings all
afternoon, so if I am not around, leave me an email.


pls print with cover memo.  thanks. df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 04/19/2000
08:37 AM ---------------------------

04/18/2000 05:42 PM
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
04/18/2000 05:42 PM
04/18/2000 05:42 PM
To: Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill
Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michel
Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim Aron/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Johnny
McGee/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, lslade@modrall.com,
laruzow@concentric.net, jw1000mac@yahoo.com, James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Emily Sellers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Virginia
O'Neill/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Amelia Alder/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Judy
Kudym/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Hope Acosta/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Meeting with Zaman - April 17th

Please see the attached.


Yes, she is actually down here right now and I am showing it to her.  Send me your names and I'll print them in color for her.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:03 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	FW: 5th and 6th floor layouts

Should we have Sonia do this for this move?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shepperd, Tammy R.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:02 AM
To:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	RE: 5th and 6th floor layouts

Jeff, please ask your assistant to enter all data but not to submit the churn.  The only thing that would change is the final location for that person.

Thanks a million for the quick turnaround!
Tammy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:54 AM
To:	Shepperd, Tammy R.
Subject:	RE: 5th and 6th floor layouts

Tammy -

With gas risk names in.   << File: _6th floorplan 01 301.xls >>

Do we need to have our assistant put in churn requests,  or wait until this is all settled?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shepperd, Tammy R.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:26 AM
To:	Beck, Sally; Reeves, Leslie; White, Stacey W.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Cc:	Cox, Paige
Subject:	5th and 6th floor layouts

Attached are the excel floor plans with this morning's information.  Please utilize these as a working tool to put names on seats.  Hopefully Presto and Lavorato will not make major changes to the layout.

Operations on the 6th floor are between 401 and 494.

Please phone me with any questions.

Regards,
Tammy
x36589

 << File: 5th floorplan 0130.xls >>     << File: 6th floorplan 01 30.xls >>


Here is the bbq that I was talking about on Saturday. Let me know if you want
to go.
-E

Phillip M Love
07/25/2000 09:01 AM
To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CLEAR LAKE

Just wanted to remind you guys of the get together this weekend for the Texas
guys at my house.  Please let me know by Friday if you will be able to come
and I will draw up some maps.  I was thinking about 5 p.m. to get started.
Beer and burgers will be on the menu with a little bit of billards action.
Please bring your significant others(Mick, please only bring one).
PL


?
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
																										[IMAGE]

																				Enerfax Daily

																		[IMAGE]
																																[IMAGE]

																														")} TC
																								[IMAGE]
																																		[IMAGE]

																																			[IMAGE]

																																								[IMAGE]

																																Looking  for a past article or issue. Click here to use Sagewave's  Search.

																															Enerfax  Daily? -? Page  ? -? November 27,  2000

																																							[IMAGE]

																																				[IMAGE]

																																						Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 4? -?  November 27, 2000 -? ?  Past  Issues
Available on Sagewave

																																								[IMAGE]
																																		[IMAGE]

																																													[IMAGE]
																																						[IMAGE]
																																									[IMAGE]
																																									[IMAGE]

																																	Consultant Says Mexico to Pay Billions for Natural Gas

																																	? ?  Mexico, over the next decade, will likely need to spend $40.6  Billion
to import natural gas, given Pemex's failure to conduct  adequate capital
investment, consultants Consultores Internacionales  have said in a report.
The estimate assumes an average price for  natural gas of $4.50 per MMBtu
over the period. In a more  conservative scenario, with the average price of
natural gas at  $3.50 per MMBtu, the country over the next 10 years would
need to  spend $31.6 billion dollars on natural gas imports, according to
the  report. Under both scenarios, estimates expect that Mexico will need  to
import 24.7 Bcf of natural gas during the coming decade.

																																					[IMAGE]

																									Natural? Gas? Storage?  Report

																												[IMAGE]
																												[IMAGE]

																												? ? ? ? ? ? Week?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  Prev?
																												? ? ? ? ?  ?Ending? ? Prev? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ?Prev? ?  Year? ?
																												| Region | 11/17/00| Week | Diff | % Full | Year |  % Full
																												|  Prod? ?|? ?664? ?|? 688 |  -24? |? 70%? ?|? 843 |?  89%? ?
																												| East? ?|? 1643?  ?| 1682 | -39? |? 90%? ?| 1711  |? 94%? ?
																												| West? ?|? ?341?  ?|? 372 | -31? |? 67%? ?|?  442 |? 87%? ?
																												|? ? ? ?  |? ? ? ? ?|? ? ?  |? ? ? |? ? ? ? |?  ? ? |? ? ? ?
																												| Total? |? 2648?  ?| 2742 | -94? |? 80%? ?| 2996  |? 91%? ?

																												[IMAGE]

																												[IMAGE]

																																										[IMAGE]

																																											Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 7? -?  November 27, 2000

																																									[IMAGE]

																																										[IMAGE]

																																				September Canadian Natural Gas Sales

																																				Natural gas sales totaled 4.22 billion cubic meters in  September, up 10.2%
over September 1999. The increase was the result  of increased demand by the
industrial and residential sectors. Use  by the industrial sector rose 11.7%,
amid higher use of natural gas  for electricity generation and stronger
demand by the chemical  industry. Year-to-date sales were up 7.1% over the
same period in  1999. Industrial sector sales continued to grow strongly,
posting an  11.1% increase. Consumption by the residential sector increased
1%,  while the commercial sector decreased 1.1%.

																																												[IMAGE]
																																								[IMAGE]

																																								[IMAGE]

																																														Financial Summary

																																											[IMAGE]

																													")} TC
																						[IMAGE]

 - blnk.gif
 - img17.gif
 - img18.gif
 - img19.gif
 - img20.gif
 - img21.gif
 - img22.gif
 - img23.gif
 - img24.gif
 - img25.gif
 - img26.gif
 - img27.gif
 - img28.gif
 - img29.gif
 - img30.gif
 - img31.gif
 - img32.gif
 - img33.gif
 - img34.gif
 - img35.gif
 - img10.gif
 - img36.gif
 - img37.gif
 - id=444924


It looks like now we are in fact going to go up to Napa. Is there any way
all of us can play golf tomorrow?

>From: Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com>
>To: "'Dasovich, Jeff'" <Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com>
>CC: 'Scotty' <scottwl@hotmail.com>
>Subject: RE: This Weekend
>Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 14:09:24 -0700
>
>I will send you the email later today.
>
>We were planning on looking at hotels in the Santa Cruz area again this
>weekend and hanging out with Lizanne and Ken.  We are going to Napa next
>weekend, so I really didn't want to go up twice.  Unlike you guys (who
>practically live up there), I like to take my parents in smaller doses.  I
>will be sure to send some flowers.
>
>-C
>
>
>Cameron Sellers
>Vice President, Business Development
>PERFECT
>1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
>Palo Alto, CA 94303
>cameron@perfect.com
>650.798.3366 (direct dial)
>650.269.3366 (cell)
>650.858.1095 (fax)
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>From: 	Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
>Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 1:37 PM
>To:	cameron@perfect.com; Scott Laughlin (E-mail)
>Subject:	This Weekend
>
>Eldon called me this morning informing me that it's their anniversary
>this weekend. As such, I sort of tossed any other plans out the window
>and told him that we'd definitely be around.  As such, I was wondering
>if you guys planned to do the same, and if so, (following up on your
>note Scott), it would be totally fucking cool to play golf Sunday
>morning (particularly since I have not desire to sit around a and watch
>football).  You guys up for golf?  You plan on doing the anniversary
>thing?
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
>PS Where's my email Ms Perfect?
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
>and
>may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
>intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
>others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
>authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>reply
>to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
>copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
>intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
>binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
>relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
>Thank you.
>**********************************************************************

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Are you sure about this?  I didn't know I had a NY bar number.

Brenda McAfee@ENRON
04/14/2000 03:45 PM
To: Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Abha
Kaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Bonnie
Nelson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard Fromer/HOU/EES@EES, Cynthia Harkness/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Edwin Essandoh/HOU/EES@EES, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yao
Apasu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carlos
Ryerson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Tami Scrudder/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: New York Bar Numbers

We will need to obtain from you each of your bar numbers for the State of New
York in order to obtain CLE credits on your behalf for attending the Enron
Law Conference.  (Tami, there are two names on the second page of the New
York sign-up sheet that I could not read-maybe you could send this message on
to those two people if you can read the names).  Thanks.  Brenda McAfee
x3-6536


Hey Moma Dee,

Just writing to say whats up and that Choir Rehearsal starts a 7:00pm.

Luv,

Jaye

P.S. If by chance I don't see ya there,  write me back your new wk#.


This is the BEST EVER!
?
>http://www.colonize.com/warp/index.html


Here;s the draft.  DOn't have the final yet -- but believe only small changes.
-----Original Message-----
From: Norman Plotkin [mailto:nplotkin@rcsis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:53 PM
To: arem@electric.com
Subject: DA letter

Attached is a letter to the Gov and Leg Leaders that tracks with our post
suspension message.

Please reply with any changes.


Kate,
#562373 was an EOL trade that Chris Mallory did. When it was done on line the
delivery point was NP-15 now in Enpower it has been changed to SP-15. Could
you check with Chris if this is correct. I thought that we were not allowed
to change EOL trades. If he did then I will have to get with Legal to find
out what our next step would be.

Thanks,

Kimberly


Per Prebon:
Matt sold to Public Service of Colorado 25 mw of Q4 PV at $150.00


FYI.  Presentation by Brattle Group before CA leg committee yesterday in
which they assert market power at the CA border (held by "out-of-state
suppliers") explains high gas prices in California.  If you have any
questions, call me at 415.782.7822.  Please forward to others whom you think
might be interested.  Stephanie, could you forward along to Barry?

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/19/2001 12:23 PM -----

	Douglas.Porter@sce.com
	04/19/2001 11:36 AM

		 To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

Per your request, attached are the presentation slides from yesterday.

Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney
Southern California Edison Company
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(fax)
douglas.porter@sce.com(See attached file: DRT2486.PPT)
 - DRT2486.PPT


---------------------- Forwarded by Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 01:48 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Beau Ratliff @ EES                           11/30/2000 01:44 PM

To: Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Pre-date test...

 Please do this test and tell me how many points you got...


I don't think this agreement  will be on the agenda until next week.

If things change (moving up or back), I'll let you know.

Thanks,

Kay

Christi L Nicolay@ECT
08/01/2000 09:00 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: VEPCO's form interconnection agreement

I will review this.  What is your time frame please?  Thanks.

	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           07/31/2000 09:49 AM

To: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: VEPCO's form interconnection agreement

Attached is the form interconnection agreement provided by Virgina Power, for
your information, review, etc. It is a new form which is currently under
review by VEPCO.

Kay


sounds good.

-----Original Message-----
From: Connor, Joe
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 9:29 PM
To: Montovano, Steve; Nicolay, Christi L.
Cc: Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Lindberg, Susan
Subject: RE: North Carolina Utils Comm'n Motion for Stay of SE RTO
mediation

I agree with Steve.  We should join in the response to oppose the request for stay.

-----Original Message-----
From: Montovano, Steve
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 6:05 PM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Connor, Joe
Cc: Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Lindberg, Susan
Subject: RE: North Carolina Utils Comm'n Motion for Stay of SE RTO
mediation

In order to remain consistent with our message in the rest of the region, supporting FERC order, I suggest we join in the response. SM

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 6:24 PM
To: Montovano, Steve; Connor, Joe
Cc: Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Lindberg, Susan
Subject: North Carolina Utils Comm'n Motion for Stay of SE RTO mediation

Steve or Joe -- Is there a reason that politically we would not want to join in a response against the North Carolina Utility Commission's request to stay the SE RTO mediation?  At least some others (Electricities) is planning to oppose, so it will not go unopposed if Enron doesn't join in.  From a pure FERC filing perspective, I have reviewed and totally disagree with the NCUC's request and would be happy to support FERC.  (DUE 8/28)

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Pomper, David E. [mailto:david.pomper@spiegelmcd.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:20 AM
To: RT01-100 Better Mousetrap Group; Bryant, Frederick (FMPA); Williams,
Bob (FMPA)
Cc: Horwood, James N.; Norris, Clay (Electricities)
Subject: Answering North Carolina Utils Comm'n Motion for Stay

As you may know, while several state Commissions have sought rehearing of
FERC's July 12 orders initiating the RT-100 mediation, the NCUC accompanied
its rehearing application with an August 13 motion to stay that Order.
ElectriCities, via Jim Horwood of our firm, is planning to file on August 28
in opposition to that motion, on the grounds that a single RTO for the
Southeast is well worth attempting to achieve through mediation and that the
GridSouth record belies the NCUC's claims of surprise.  A multiparty
opposition by multiple transmission customers and others would be helpful in
keeping RTO unification on track.  Accordingly, we invite you all to
consider joining in our opposition (draft to be circulated in advance of the
August 28 due date but not yet written) or filing an opposition of your own.
If you're sufficiently interested in joining such a motion to want an
advance draft for confidential review, please let me know who should get it,
along with any special considerations on timing.


Make sure you take care of Dave...


You have received this message because someone has attempted to send you an e-mail from outside of Enron with an attachment type that Enron does not allow into our messaging environment. Your e-mail has been quarantined and is being held at the MailSweeper server.

Sender:  VKaminski@aol.com
Date:  Thu, 24 Jan 2002 20:51:39 EST
Subject:  Fwd: FW: EIA to Display Draft of New Storage Survey at GasMart/Power 2002
Attachment Type: Scenarios/Incoming/Inbound URL Catcher: A filename matching the file mask was detected: '~~dlnk0.url'.
Scenarios/Incoming/Inbound URL Catcher: A filename matching the file mask was detected: '~~dlnk1.url'.
Scenarios/Incoming/Inbound URL Catcher: A filename matching the file mask was detected: '~~dlnk2.url'.
Scenarios/Incoming/Inbound URL Catcher: A filename matching the file mask was detected: '~~dlnk3.url'.

If the intended email is of valid business-related content and you believe it requires Enron resources to retrieve it, you may call your Help Desk and ask to have it released from quarantine and delivered to your e-mail Inbox. Your message will be scanned and checked for viruses prior to requested release.  If it contains a virus or there is reason to suspect it is malicious code, it will not be delivered.

North American Resolution Center: 713 853 1411
European Resolution Center: 0044 207 78 36777
EES Help Desk: 888 853 9797
ETS Solution Center: 713 345 4745 (Houston) or 402 398 7454 (Omaha)

Please DO NOT reply to this address as it is not a monitored system mailbox.


Potential discussion points in handout for Stan meeting, Wednesday, Feb. 6, 8:00-9:00 am, EB50MDining.


Hey Shorty,

This work thing is getting out of hand.  Today has just flown adios and we
are not very close to leaving.  I hope your day is going well.  I haven't
even had enough time to find some good wholesome jokes for you but I will.
I'll talk to you later.

Ted


Soon, soon, soon.  Last minute changes to the house.  I'll probably have a
big open house within a couple of months, but I'll have you over sooner.  My
dogs are moving to Connecticut Friday, so after then.

Congrats on a great year.

Jeff

Sandra F Brawner
01/02/2001 04:43 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: "Thank You !!"

Jeff,

Just a quick note to say "thank you" for your comments at year end.  I
sincerely appreciated your comments and support.
I hope your Holidays were safe, healthy, and happy.  Say when am I going to
see that new home of yours?  You know it is hard to continue to live
vicariously through you if I don't know what to picture!

Sandra


what is going on in denver?  are you and max finishing the details on your
wedding plans?  i need to get everyone's email who is going to attend the
bachelor party if you have them.  let me know if you have them and how
everything is going.


How did I turn around and suddenly find myself in December? Why is there a
man parked outside my office incessantly tooting "Jingle Bell Rock" on his
horn? When will I ever see my bare feet again? How annoying is it that I
began this e-mail with lines of whining?

I hope the holidays are at least a somewhat more sincere experience in
Vietnam than they are here. I guess I don't remember this kind of chaos in
years past, but then I'm spending a lot more time in the commercial center of
the city these days. Which, by the way, is going very well. I'm just getting
to the level of familiarity with my new job that allows me time for pointless
e-mails. It's been a steep learning curve, and I still have a long way to go,
but that's what makes everyday interesting.

Other than work, I haven't had time for a whole lot. Thanksgiving was nice -
saw a lot of friends from out of town and had enough meals with the family to
satisfy, but not overwhelm, the quality time scale. Our office had its big
holiday bash last weekend, which I kicked off the night before for no
apparent reason and just continued the festivities for about 48 nonstop
hours. There's snow on the mountain, so this weekend I might have to break in
(or break, whichever comes first) my new snowboard.

Hope all's well on the other side of the world. It's kind of comforting to
remind myself every once in awhile that there is another side, full of people
who could care less about power trading and Portland, Oregon. By the way, I
heard through the grapevine that Clinton was quite a hand-full. Good or bad?
Or ugly?

Shoot me an e-mail when and if you get a chance. I'm out of here on the 22nd,
and it will be so nice to see the sun again. If I don't see you, have a great
vacation, and try not to be overwhelmed by the joyousness of the season.

Kate


Shalesh,

Thanks.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ganjoo, Shalesh
Sent:	Monday, June 04, 2001 4:00 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Happy Birthday!

Vince,

Wish you a Happy Birthday and a wonderful year ahead!

Shalesh Ganjoo


Greg,

Attached are the daily position reports for the various Raptor vehicles.

Ben
----- Forwarded by Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000 06:58 AM -----

	Gordon McKillop@ENRON
	11/21/2000 08:05 PM

		 To: Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Barry Schnapper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ryan
Siurek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin D Jordan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Kopper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Loehr/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne Yaeger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rodney
Faldyn/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ron Baker/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
amy.flores@ljminvestments.com, L'Sheryl Hudson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Howard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria
LeBeau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Maxwell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susie Ayala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Raptor Position Reports for 11/20/00

The Raptor I credit capacity is at $94 million.  The credit capacity will be
impacted by fourth quarter revaluations on Catalytica, Heartland Steel and
other assets.  If the credit capacity is exceeded, Enron will need to reserve
for the loss and any future losses.

The TNPC stock closed at $9.38 on November 20.  The closing price on November
21 is $8.94 which results Raptor III exceeding its credit capacity by $12
million.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen E Magruder/HOU/EES on 04/20/2000
01:11 PM ---------------------------

Jessie Knight <JKnight@sdchamber.org> on 04/19/2000 02:08:53 AM
To: "'kmagrude@enron.com'" <kmagrude@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: PR release

Kathleen,
     I hope some version of the attached serves your purpose.  Please feel
free to take editorial license as I granted per our conversation.

Enron has exercised the most compelling business model, one that has been
starved from the industry's natural evolution by regulatory and
protectionist strictures.  This initiative affirms why many of us early
pioneers fought to create full customer choice in the beginning. It will
prove to be a key moment in the renaissance of this industry.
Jessie J. Knight Jr.
President and CEO
San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce <http://www.sdchamber.org/>

Internet Services provided by net <http://www.znet.com/>


That's no problem.  With 2 kids we like to catch up on our sleep during the
weekend.  Nicolas was one of our finalist  for Alex.


Mark:

Attached please find the final version of the NDA revised as per our
discussion this morning.  I have attached both a clean version and a red-line
against the last version I sent to you.  As we discussed, I will have the NDA
executed and forward to Lee for execution on your end.

Regards,

Leslie Hansen


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Port, David
Sent:	Friday, June 01, 2001 1:56 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J; Whalley, Greg
Subject:	Enterprise Wide Risk

Here is an outline of the possible scope/impacts for the EWRM effort as discussed:

<Embedded Microsoft PowerPoint Slide>
<Embedded Microsoft PowerPoint Slide>


great news! Keep up the good work.

	Stephen D Burns

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sue
Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Fiber Optic Public Lands Right-of-Way Status

The fat lady hasn't quite sung yet, but I thought it would be a good idea to
give you a readout on the current status of the BLM/USFS fiber optic
right-of-way issue.

In a nutshell, our strategy seems to have worked and we've won all the
concessions we sought.  As you'll recall these were:

a) to get the BLM to withdraw any "interim" policies, the first of which
split fiber cables into 144 different ROW certifications, and a later version
that re-packaged the issue, mandating that ROW certificates be issued each
time a fiber owner subleases or sells capacity on its line, with a
retroactivity clause that added extra sting;
b) to get the Forest Service to retract its May 2nd memorandum which changed
its fiber optic ROW policy from published fee schedules to individual
"comparable" assessments (the first such assessment, which compared ROW fees
in urban centers in downtown Portland and Seattle to Oregon forest lands,
increased the cost of a segment of our FTV fiber build 150 fold);
c) to block both agencies from implementing any proposed or final rule in FY
2001; and
d) to create an open rule making process that involves all interested
stakeholders, including Enron.

Thanks to the considerable pressure we orchestrated from Congress and the
Administration, BLM Director Fry and USFS Chief Dombeck have backed away from
points a and b above, and have agreed to points c and d.   The language we
inserted in the Interior Appropriations Bill, which has been agreed to by the
Conferees, forces both agencies to revert back to the published fee
schedules, prevents them from implementing any new policies in FY 2001, and
forces them to work with industry and to come up with a common policy for
future rent determination.

The reference in the opening sentence to gravitationally-challenged women is
because the issue still hasn't quite closed.  The Interior Appropriations
Bill may very well be vetoed.  But since our issue was settled at the staff
level, and is now off the table, we're likely to remain safe from being
re-examined and challenged.  In fact, any changes would likely only increase
the strength of our hand: some members of our coalition are trying to insert
even more detailed language in the report that prescribes exactly how the
agencies will proceed to determine the new rental fee schedules over the next
18 months.  Through outside consultants, we've had a series of constructive
discussions with the agencies over the past two weeks that have forged
agreements on timing and specific ways forward.   Details are forthcoming,
but Enron would be involved closely in the process.  The agencies were
clearly surprised by the clout we wielded, and are now more than willing to
negotiate.

But the bottom line, again, is that we have stopped both agencies from
implementing their costly interim policies or launching a rule making process
either now (which they originally intended to do) or in the coming fiscal
year.  And by engaging key Members of Congress and the White House, and
organizing and leading the 20-member  Fiber Optic Public Land Right-of-Way
Coalition, we've succeeded in branding Enron as a leader in the
communications field.

Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: Bradford, William S.
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:40 AM
To: Storey, Geoff
Subject: FW: 3-WAY CONFIRM TEMPLATE.doc

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:56 AM
To: Bradford, William S.
Subject: 3-WAY CONFIRM TEMPLATE.doc

Each of the parties to this Agreement recognizes and acknowledges that the parties are acting and agreeing to perform their obligations hereunder in reliance upon (i) the timely execution and delivery by [legal name of other counterparty] ("Third Party") and Party A of a transaction in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A ("Third Party Transaction A") and would not otherwise agree to execute, deliver and perform under this Agreement if Third Party and Party A were not contemporaneously executing and delivering Third Party Transaction A and (ii) the timely execution and delivery by Third Party and Party B of a transaction in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B ("Third party Transaction B") and would not otherwise agree to execute, deliver and perform under this Agreement if Third Party and Party B were not contemporaneously executing and delivering Third party Transaction B.  The effectiveness of this Agreement shall be subject to the condition that contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of this Agreement Party A and Third Party execute and deliver Third Party Transaction A and Party B and Third Party execute and deliver Third Party Transaction B.


You need to give me a boottle in a  brown bag.

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 09/01/2000 08:52:15 AM
To: "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Phone Call

There are a ton of parks around with nice, little benches.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 9:25 AM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: RE: Phone Call

I thought I would sleep in the car, or maybe a shelter.

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 09/01/2000 08:04:28 AM

To:   "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Phone Call

So where are you going to stay... the floor is available.... it's got
carpet.

I really appreciate your help!!!!!!!!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 8:31 AM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: Re: Phone Call

I reserved a one-way ticket on Continental last night for 6:45am Tuesday,
19th.  It cost $263.00 and its completly refundable.  Sounds good to me.
I told the reservation lady that I was thinking about buying 2 tickets and
just get my money back for the one I don't use.  I would buy one leaving
Monday evening and the one for Tuesday morning

COOL, don't you think?

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 09/01/2000 06:15:24 AM

To:   "'Germany, Chris'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Phone Call

Sorry... I didn't call last night.

I was working on my September spreadsheet for TCO at home. I was going to
take a break and call you and my parents... but I had to get the
spreadsheet
done for the long weekend. I finished it at 1:30 am. Thought this would be
too late to call.

Hopefully the weekend scheduling goes smooth, so I can work on August
Accounting this afternoon. I'm just extemely slow at everything right now.

Let's talk this afternoon.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


I wish I could be there. I know it will be a great time, but I will be in
Arkansas.  Will I see you tonight?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

October 12, 2001 5:00pm through October 15, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

EES:

Impact:  EES
Time:  Sat 10/13/2001 at  2:00:00 PM thru Sat 10/13/2001 at  5:00:00 PM
Outage:  Netfinity upgrade on EES Lotus Notes - Server name EESHOU-LN11 & EESHOU-LN12
Disruption:  Intermittent Disruption of Service
Environments Impacted:  EES
Purpose:
Backout: Uninstall monitoring tools.
Contact(s): 	Animesh Solanki  713-853-5147
		Roderic H Gerlach

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:    SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:    SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

SITARA:    SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:    SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


Robert Rose@ENRON
	05/31/2001 03:57 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Towles/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Shadow Creek Ranch Easement

Dan,

Sorry it's taken me so long to get back to you on this -- I got
sent out to the field for most of the day.

Can you send me your fax number so I can get you the
legal description.

Also, I don't think a duration time is necessary.  It would
be in HPL's best interest to have this easement in
perpetuity.  HPL will have the right to abandon the line
in place if it so chooses.

Thank you for your excellent and fast help!!!

r

Dan J Hyvl@ECT
05/30/2001 04:41 PM
To: Robert Rose/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Towles/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Shadow Creek Ranch Easement

Robert,
 Where is the description of our right-of-way which we want to put in this
document before we send it out.  I think we need to change the first
paragraph, but I need to see the description to verify.  Is it intended that
we are dealing with only one owner, or is this developer using a different
ownership for each development.  Maybe it is all one development?  Otherwise
the form looks okay.  Should we consider adding language regarding duration
of easement grant, i.e. abandonment after 5 years of non-use.

	Robert Rose@ENRON
	05/30/2001 03:21 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Towles/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Shadow Creek Ranch Easement

Dan,

I have previously discussed this proposed easement with Barbara
and Ann Elizabeth.  In a nutshell, a large developer wishes us to
define a series of mainly undefined easements in Fort Bend
and Brazoria Counties.  My response to them was to release the
earlier easements and in their place sign a single new easement with
language most favorable to HPL.

Attached is a draft of my proposed easement.  Please review
and make any changes you deem necessary or desirable.

Thanks!!!

r


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
11:43 AM ---------------------------

"Makiko Sato" <makiko@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 10/13/2000 03:58:56 PM
To: <seminars@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>, <grads@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>,
<undergrads@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>, <faculty@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>,
<emeriti@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>, <visiting@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>,
<staff@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>, <faculty@its.berkeley.edu>,
<students@its.berkeley.edu>, <vkaminski@aol.com>, <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: IEOR MONDAY SEMINAR - OCTOBER 23, 2000

?
?
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND  OPERATIONS RESEARCH
MONDAY SEMINAR
IEOR 298-1 - FALL 2000

Monday, October 23,  2000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------

"Volatility of Electricity  Prices - Measurement and Analysis of Underlying
Causes"
Dr.  Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director and Head of Research for Enron  Corp.

?

Abstract:

The last three years were characterized  by exceptionally high volatility of
the power prices in the US markets. The  market developments have created a
number of unique challenges for energy  industry economists. One immediate
question we have to answer is how to  measure volatility of energy prices.
Although we can all agree that the  prices in the power markets are
characterized by high variability, the  traditional measures used in
financial economics (annualized standard  deviation of log price returns) may
not fit well electricity prices.

The second challenge is to explain the  sources of high price volatility and
to answer the question to what extent  it can be attributed to problems that
can be addressed in the long run. Such  problems include flaws in market
design that allow some market participants  to abuse market power, limited
availability and/or unequal access to  transmission, temporary shortages of
generation capacity. Some factors  underlying high volatility of electricity
prices may be of permanent nature  and may be a necessary price to pay for
increased market efficiency and  expanded customer choice.

TIME  AND LOCATION: 3:30 - 5:00 P.M. - 3108 ETCHEVERRY
REFRESHMENTS: 3:00 P.M.  - 4TH FLOOR HALLWAY


This looks good... all your cc are good and he said to send to all ENA
Employees.......

Thanks again for all your help......This will be out tomorrow morning,
correct ?????

Thanks,

Kay

   Enron Americas - Office of the Chairman
From: David Delainey and John Lavorato@ENRON on 12/20/2000 05:21 PM
Sent by: Enron Messaging Administration@ENRON
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Enron Messaging Administration/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: DRAFT5 - Re-Alignment

Hello - Please review revised message.  The message will be sent to: ENA
Employees.  I will place the following individuals in the CC field:

Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R
Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey
McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F
Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth
Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Thanks.  Tracey

Thanks to all of you, Enron North America has had an outstanding year in
2000.  Some of the more notable accomplishments include:
a) 100% plus increase in EBIT from 1999 actuals to 2000 forecast;
b) significant rationalization of the balance sheet including the sale of the
(i) Wind River/Powder River gathering assets, (ii) East Coast Power
generating assets, (iii) HPL and (iv) five of the six Eastern Peakers;
c) ENA is the leading energy merchant by a factor of two;
d) physical electricity volume grew by 34% YTD 1999 to YTD 2000 forecast;
e) natural gas volumes grew by 82% YTD 1999 to YTD 2000 forecast;
f) 500% growth in daily transactions from November 1999 to November 2000 due
to the highly successful Enron OnLine distribution channel; and
g) ENA reaching its 25% ROCE target.

These are truly outstanding accomplishments and our expectations for growth
and opportunity in Enron North America for 2001 are consistent with that
success.  In order to reach these goals, we felt it necessary to re-align a
number of our organizations. A number of these changes are completed.  The
goals of such re-alignment include:
a) increase overall productivity with the goal to ensure that every employee
is in a position to contribute regardless of skill set;
b) increase overall market coverage, deal flow and information generation
with the goal to increase bid/offer income, increase the velocity of deal
flow, improve customer coverage and promote quality information transfer to
our trading organization;
c) increase deal quality and earnings quality with the goal to (i) allocate
our resources towards the best transactions and (ii) significantly increase
our &mid-market8 originated transactions in our portfolio;
d) promote real time decision making and a closer tie between our trading and
origination (mid-market and structured) organizations in order to better
align those functions to reduce the amount of un-productive internal focus;
e) increase the overall velocity of the capital being utilized consistent
with our goal of a 25% plus return on capital employed; and
f) identify and recognize a host of new leaders in the organization that are
critical to meeting our goals next year.

With these objectives in mind, patterned after the successful business models
in Calgary and Portland, effective immediately the following changes are
being implemented:
a) East Power ) a single East Power Team incorporating trading, mid-market
and origination will be formed under the co-leadership of Kevin Presto and
Janet Dietrich who will report to the Enron Americas - Office of the Chairman
(EA OOC).  This team will have one income statement, one book and a joint
accountability. However, a clear delineation of responsibilities inside these
teams will continue to exist in which the trading organization will manage
the risk, income statement and product development aspects of the
partnership. The originators will have the primary responsibility to generate
origination income, provide coverage, deal flow, lead strategy formulation,
provide information and generate strategic positions.  Overall, the team will
be rewarded based upon increasing the value of the book, meeting
coverage/deal flow targets and meeting its strategic/growth goals in the
Eastern power markets. The team will be responsible for covering the IOU,s,
muni,s/co-ops, industrials and IPP,s and will utilize all ENA,s product
capabilities including the power commodity, assets and capital. The team will
further be broken down into several key strategic regions and business units
including:
  (i) ERCOT ) managed by Doug Gilbert Smith and Bruce Sukaly;
  (ii) NE ) managed by Dana Davis and Jeff Ader;
  (iii) Midwest ) managed by Fletch Sturm and Ed Baughman;
  (iv) SE ) managed by Rogers Herndon and Ozzie Pagan;
  (v) East Power Development ) managed by Ben Jacoby;
  (vi) East Power Structuring  - managed by Bernie Aucoin; and
  (vii) East Power Fundamentals and the &Genco8 ) managed by Lloyd Will

b) West Power ) there will be no changes to the Portland office which is
managed by Tim Belden and Chris Calger .  Both Tim and Chris will continue to
report to the EA OOC.
c) Canada and Mexico ) there will be no changes to the Canadian or Mexican
offices which are managed by Rob Milnthorp and Max Yzaguirre respectively.
Both Rob and Max will continue to report to the EA OOC.
d) U.S. Natural Gas ) there are several changes anticipated in this business
consistent with the goals and objectives described above. The changes
primarily affect the East, Central, West and Texas gas regions. Each region
will consist of a single gas team incorporating trading, mid-market and
origination. Each team will have one income statement, one book and a joint
accountability. However, a clear delineation of responsibilities inside these
teams will continue to exist in which the trading organization will manage
the risk, income statement and product development aspects of the
partnership. The originators will have the primary responsibility to generate
origination income, provide coverage, deal flow, lead strategy formulation,
provide information and generate strategic positions. Overall, the team will
be rewarded based upon increasing the value of the book, meeting
coverage/deal flow targets and meeting its strategic/growth goals in the
Eastern, Western, Central and Texas gas markets.  The team will be
responsible for covering the LDC,s, muni,s/co-ops, industrials, IOU,s, IPP,s
and the producers.  There will be an increasing focus on the upstream side of
the business including the producers, transporters and storage providers in
addition to market area opportunities. The team will utilize all of ENA,s
product capabilities including the gas commodity, assets and capital. Each of
these groups will report directly to the EA OOC;
East Gas ) a single East Gas Team incorporating trading, mid-market and
origination will be formed under the co-leadership of Scott Neal and Frank
Vickers who will be returning from Portland to join this team.
West Gas  ) in a similar manner, a West Gas Team will be formed co-managed by
Phillip Allen and Barry Tycholiz, who will be joining us in Houston from the
Canadian team. The Denver office under Mark Whitt will be integrated under
this team.
Central Gas )  in a similar manner, a Central Gas Team will be formed
co-managed by Hunter Shively and Laura Luce. The Chicago office will be
integrated into this team.
Texas Gas ) the Texas Gas Team will be managed by Tom Martin. This team will
continue to manage the gas trading business around HPL until the pending sale
is concluded in Q2 2001.  After the sale of HPL, this team will build a Texas
gas business without ownership of the HPL assets.
Financial ) this group will continue to be managed by John Arnold with no
significant changes.
Derivatives ) this group, lead by Fred Lagrasta, will offer derivative and
financial mid-market products and services to the natural gas market
specifically targeting CFO,s and treasury departments.  Fred will continue to
maintain certain existing mid-market accounts with a number of producer and
industrial accounts where relationships are well formed. Otherwise,
mid-market coverage will gravitate to the regions. The New York office gas
marketing efforts will continue to be managed by Fred.
Upstream Products ) this group, lead by Jean Mrha, will develop several
distinct product offerings for the upstream segment of the gas market.  This
group will develop and market the product in conjunction with the regions.
This is consistent with our desire to have a broader product offering and
greater market penetration in the upstream segment.  These products include
producer outsourcing, similar to our successful Petro-Canada and Suncor
relationships in Canada, physical storage re-engineering, compressor
services, wellhead liquidity products and offshore asset and capital
products.  In addition, Jean will manage our Bridgeline joint venture with
Texaco.
Gas Structuring ) this group will be lead by Ed McMichael, reporting to Frank
Vickers, will provide structuring and deal support to all the gas teams.
Gas Fundamentals ) this group will be lead by Chris Gaskill, reporting to
Hunter Shively, will provide fundamentals to all the gas teams.

Julie Gomez will continue to support the gas floor through several identified
projects including long-term supply/demand analysis and, natural gas
transportation capacity trading opportunities.

There is an expectation of some customer overlap between the gas and power
groups; for example, the combination utilities and the IPP,s.  The teams will
coordinate with regard to the combination utilities like Con. Edison or
PG&E.  With regard to the IPP,s, to the extent that the product offering
involves an underlying power position, the power teams will manage. We have
asked Janet Dietrich to coordinate such overlaps between the two
organizations in Houston.

e) Technical/Restructuring - In the effort to consolidate and centralize our
technical resources (engineering, development, operations, pipeline) to
ensure that this skill base is available to all ENA groups and utilized
productively across the organization, Brian Redmond will form and manage the
Technical Services Group.  This group will manage ENA,s technical risks and
will provide, on a cost basis, technical services for the entire ENA
organization. This group will manage the interface with EE&CC and OEC.  In
addition, the Restructuring Group, currently managed by Dick Lydecker, will
report to Brian Redmond.  This group is currently monetizing a large portion
of the merchant investment portfolio given our current strategies.  This
group will have continuing responsibility to manage troubled commodity and
capital transactions that need considerable time and attention to manage risk
and monetize.

In addition to these responsibilities, Brian will manage the pending sale and
transition of the HPL asset over the next couple quarters as regulatory and
securities approvals are obtained in order to complete the sale.  Brian will
report to the EA OOC.

f) Principal Investing  )  with the departure of Jeff Donahue to new
opportunities in EBS, ENA,s venture capital function will be managed by
Michael L. Miller.  This group makes small investments in distributed
generation, power quality and technology companies that can benefit from
Enron,s distribution channels and expertise.  Michael will report to the EA
OOC.

g) Corporate Development ) Tim Detmering will assume the corporate
development responsibilities for ENA as Jeff transitions to his new role and
will report to the EA OOC.

h) Generation Investments ) there will be no changes to this group managed by
Dave Duran. Dave will continue to report to the EA OOC.

i) Energy Capital Resources ) there will be no changes to this group
currently lead by C. John Thompson and Scott Josey.  John and Scott will
continue to report to the EA OOC.

As a final note in the interest of keeping things simple, Enron Americas will
have two operating divisions  - Enron North America and Enron South America.
As a result, we will continue to conduct business under these two operating
companies; therefore, eliminating the need to change legal entities et al.
If you are currently a commercial employee of ENA or ESA you will continue to
conduct business in that company.

We look forward to another exciting year in the North American energy
market.  This is certainly a company unrivaled in the marketplace with the
most talented employees.  The opportunities are endless.  We wish you and
your family a very happy and safe holiday season.


Mark,  Attached is a draft of the Owner's Engineer Agreement for the Gulf
Power transmission facilities.  Please review.  Note that I need some input
on the following:

 1.  Description of Services - Exhibit "A"
 2.  Rate Schedule - Exhibit "B"


April 30, 2001
Notice No. 01-144

TO:
ALL COMEX AND NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS
ALL COMEX AND NYMEX DIVISION MEMBER FIRMS
ALL COMEX AND NYMEX DIVISION CLEARING MEMBERS

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
Proposed Amendment to COMEX Aluminum Supplement No. 1 &Official List of
Approved Brands and Markings.8

The Exchange proposes to amend COMEX Aluminum Supplement No. 1 &Official List
of Approved Brands and Markings8.  The proposed amendment changes the name of
the producer of the &NSA8 brand of aluminum from NSA Ltd to Century Aluminum
of Kentucky LLC. The Exchange has been informed that NSA Ltd. has been
acquired by Century Aluminum Company and that the company name has been
changed to Century Aluminum of Kentucky LLC.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission must approve the proposed
amendment.  The Exchange Membership will be notified when Commission approval
is received and the effective date.

A copy of the proposed amendment can be found at
http://www.nymex.com/refernce/notices/2001/ntm_144.htm

Should you have any questions or require any further information please
contact Albert J. Getz at (212) 299-2608.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-144)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


I am not very comfortable with that at all.  I think with the filing of the proxy that we would have a disclosure issue..  It could also call into question whether or not Enron plans to perform under the MTBE deal. I do not think we need a letter though.  A letter agreement already exists between the two companies.  Another alternative would be for EOTT to go get there own LC,s and have Enron pick-up the cost.  That would keep EOTT's unitholders indifferent.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:31 PM
To:	Horton, Stanley
Subject:	FW: Producers requesting L/Cs

I have told Lawrence that if it is necessary we can get a letter affirming the deal.    However, how comfortable might you be in telling them to do business differently to avoid calling on the LC's.     Not suggesting we should just thinking we should probably be prepared if asked.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Clayton, Lawrence
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:17 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	RE: Producers requesting L/Cs

Based upon our conversation, I agree that we s/not need to have any immediate disclosure over Enron's ability to perform - OK, Main Issue Done!

However, I do feel that we should address/consider, before issuing the 10-Q, whether we need a written confirmation from Enron of their intention to meet EOTT's LC needs estimated to be in a range of $200-$400mm.

	Lawrence Clayton 10/30/2001 02:19 PM 	  To: Rod Hayslett/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON  cc:   Subject: RE: Producers requesting L/Cs << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

Do you think we need for Enron to acknowledge, in writing, their ability and/or intention to perform under our facility?

	Rod Hayslett/ENRON@enronXgate 10/30/2001 02:02 PM 	   To: Lawrence Clayton/Houston/Eott@Eott  cc: Mary Perkins/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: RE: Producers requesting L/Cs

Looks like there may have been a little confusion here, but it appears that the deal is still working as before.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Clayton, Lawrence
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:53 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	Producers requesting L/Cs

Rod, I am very concerned about the statement that Enron cannot get any added LCs' issued.  This may be a disclosue event for us.  I think we need this retracted and for Enron to affirm there ability to perform under our facility.  Your thoughts?
----- Forwarded by Lawrence Clayton/Houston/Eott on 10/30/2001 01:49 PM -----

	Josie Castrejana 10/30/2001 11:19 AM 	   To: Lawrence Clayton/Houston/Eott@Eott  cc:   Subject: Producers requesting L/Cs

We have the following new requests for L/Cs to cover our lease purchases.  They are requesting L/Cs because of the Enron situation.  I've spoken with some of them and they just won't budge.

1.  Newfield Exploration		$3MM   	to cover Oct & Nov
2.  J. Cleo Thompson		$1.8MM to cover Oct & Nov
3.  Apache Corp.		$700K     to cover Nov
4.  W. C. Miller			$175K     to cover Nov

I've already spoken to Jesse Mata at Enron and she is telling me she cannot get any L/Cs issued - their banks are not allowing it.   I've got a call into Jack Insigna at Standard Chartered to see if they would be willing to EOTT's L/Cs.  He's checking.

We could prepay Apache - they are obviously not a credit risk.  the others i'm not sure about - we're checking their credit.

let me know about how much you're willing to with Enron.  thanks.  jc


I would like to have a meeting today at 4pm to review the work that West Power URM has been working on to compare the economic impact of the 4 alternatives.

It would also be good to get any other feedback from the meetings with SCE and other relevant activities.

I will ask my assistant Linda Noske to get a call in number and a room on 47.

Please let Linda Noske know if you will attend.

Jim


Thanks.  Any view on the likelihood that the brief will have weight?
Best,
Jeff

	Vicki Sharp@EES
	04/11/2001 10:51 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
skean@enron.com@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Robert C Williams/Enron@EnronXGate@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, MDay@GMSSR.com@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Attorney General May File Amicus in UC Case Against Enron

Jeff, this was filed last week.  The hearing is this morning. We are waiting
for a report from Bob and  Mike, who are in SF.  The Asst AG  may be arguing
at the hearing today.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 04/11/2001 10:41 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
skean@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Robert C Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, MDay@GMSSR.com
cc:
Subject: Attorney General May File Amicus in UC Case Against Enron

Sue Mara (who's having computer problems today) just informed me that she's
heard a rumor floating around that Lockyear (sp?), the CA Attorney General,
or someone from his office, will file an amicus brief with the court today
supporting UC's action against us.  We'll try to get more info and report
back.  Vicki/Mike/Bob:  I'm assuming that you folks and/or our attorney's
will be there, so we'll get the details of any such appearance by the AG.

Best,
Jeff