Gary,

Any interest?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000
08:46 AM ---------------------------

"Vadim Pokhlebkin" <vpokhleb@ideaus.com> on 03/22/2000 08:51:06 AM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Subject: Today's IDEA

Good morning Vince,

Attached are today's issues of our daily morning faxes:
1. FMT, Financial Markets Today - good for FX and partly for fixed income
departments,
2. Fixed Income Today - good for bonds people only.

Do you mind if contact your colleagues directly to get their feedback?  That
will save you from spending time on forwarding this info to them.

Please let me know whom I may contact.

Best regards,
Vadim Pokhlebkin
Account Manager
vpokhlebkin@ideaglobal.com
tel. + 1 212 571 4332
fax  + 1 212 571 4334

IDEAglobal.com
140 Broadway, 21st Floor
New York, NY 10005, USA

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
IDEAglobal.com. This email, its content and any files transmitted with it
are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged
and/or confidential. Access by any other party is unauthorized without the
express written permission of the sender. If you have received this email in
error you may not copy or use the contents, attachments or information in
any way. Please destroy it and contact the sender via the IDEAglobal.com
switchboard in one of the following three offices: New York +1 212 571 4332;
London +44 171 430 2888; Singapore +65 332 0700

 - FMT0322A.pdf
 - FIT0322a.pdf


We're getting a lot of inquiries about Enron's role in California's de-reg
history, with a lot of misinformation arising out of Peace's handywork.

I spent about 3 hours on Friday with a Sac Bee reporter (Dale Kasler).  He'll
be interviewing Skilling on the same topic in a week or so, and he'd like to
talk to Steve, too.

Sue spent time with a NYT reporter discussing the same. Some common themes
are arising in the questions.  Thought it would be a good idea to spend 30
minutes discussing those themes and developing our messages to ensure
consistency.  If folks think it would be useful, is there a time this week
that we could squeeze in 30 minutes?  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


Mike's call on this.

	From:  Cathy Phillips                           12/14/2000 03:48 PM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meeting Confirmation

I will be happy to forward this message to Mark if you would like to include
him, just let me know.  Thanks.

CP

To: Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meeting Confirmation

should we invite mark wadington?

Jeff

	From:  Cathy Phillips                           12/14/2000 03:27 PM

To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: carol_benter@mckinsey.com, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Helen Marie
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joyce Dorsey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meeting Confirmation

This is to confirm that the meeting to discuss crude and petrochemical ideas
has been scheduled for Thursday, January 11, 2001, from 2:00 to 5:00 p.m.
The meeting is scheduled to take place at the McKinsey & Company office
located at 2 Houston Center, 909 Fannin, Suite 3500.  You may park in the 2
Houston Center parking garage on McKinney.  The attendees are as follows:

 Mike McConnell
 Jeff Shankman
 John Nowlan
 Jeff Donahue
 Suzanne Nimocks
 Ron Hume

Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thank you.

Cathy Phillips
713-853-6898


Here's a new one.  Michael told me he was hungry (big surprise).  I said,
"Michael, do you want some turkey?"  He said "No Mom, did you forget that I'm
a vegetarian?"

I had to leave the room as I couldn't keep from laughing!

Kay


You'll need to talk to Wes I think he is about to shut them down

-----Original Message-----
From: Muller, Mark S.
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Kitchen, Louise
Subject: Re: JP Morgan

I believe they are interested in UK/EUROPE as a second step to Netco. What do you mean deep into reserves ?
--------------------------
Sent By Mark Muller


Dr. Kenneth L. Lay
Chairman & C.E.O.
Enron Corporation

Dear Dr. Lay:

I am writing to bring your attention to an important and timely event that
will be held on September 20th at the Hyatt Regency Columbus, in Columbus,
Ohio - "The Governors' Natural Gas Summit: Responding to the Challenge." This
event is convened by the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC).?
Co-chaired by Alaska Governor Tony Knowles, IOGCC Chairman and Ohio Governor
Bob Taft, with the participation of other governors, this forum promises to
be an outstanding exchange of ideas among leaders of government, energy
producers, transporters, distributors, and end-users on the subject of the
current and long-term outlook for natural gas resources and markets in North
America. A very distinguished group of speakers is assembling, including
senior government officials and senior executives of companies critically
involved in the energy value chain.

Primary Goals of the Summit include:

* Exploring and clearly communicating the current dynamics of the natural gas
market
* Informing the industry and the public about the current and future supply
potential for gas
* Providing governmental and industry leaders with an opportunity to discuss
natural gas in the context of national energy policy, with the input of
interested State Governors.

The Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC) and the governors have
asked CERA to help organize the Summit and has invited senior CERA staff to
moderate panel discussions on the Natural Gas Marketplace and the Supply
Response for North America. In addition, I will be providing an opening
framework for participants and contributing to the wrap-up of the Summit at
the close of the day with the governors.? We are very pleased to be working
with the governors and with the IOGCC and its executive director, Christine
Hansen.

We hope that you can join us for this important event, and encourage you to
view the Summit agenda on the IOGCC Web-site at:
http://www.iogcc.state.ok.us/MEETINGS/2000_Governors_Natural_Gas_Summit.htm?

On this site, you will also find complete registration information including
fees, registration form, and logistics.

You may also be interested in a recent Washington Post article on volatility
in the gas and power markets, which helps provide a context for the
discussion and which was co-authored by CERA Managing Director Tom Robinson
and myself. This article may be found on the Washington Post Web-site at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18653-2000Jul20.html

Should you have any questions regarding the Summit or CERA's participation,
please contact my colleague Ron Kapavik at +1 936 931 1416 or via e-mail to
rkapavik@cera.com.

Sincerely,

Dan Yergin
Chairman, Cambridge Energy Research Associates

****************************************************************
Our relationship with you is very important to us.? If you wish
not to receive future e-mail notifications, please send a reply
to this message with "DoNotEmail" as the subject of your message.
(mailto:info@cera.com?subject=DoNotEmail ).
****************************************************************


I haven't checked with all of my Managers, but I know at least some of them
sent you their Satisfactory reviews and had not heard anything back from you
by 7/31 which I think was the original deadline for completing reviews.   And
I know that although I received feedback from you on my Needs Improvement
employees, I didn't receive any formal feedback on my Satisfactory employees
reporting directly to me.  I believe I recall a phone conversation that we
had where you told me to go ahead and give the Satisfactory reviews.  At that
point, I told all of my Managers to proceed with completing the reviews on
their Satisfactory employees.  I believe that all of my department's reviews
have been executed and turned in - save one for an Analyst as I am still
waiting to hear feedback from his PRC rep.    So, based on your explanation
of AnneMarie's memo, I guess I would like clarification.  Are any of the 51
in my department?  Because, it could be that we went ahead and gave them when
we were trying to get everything wrapped up in early August and be as timely
as possible in giving constructive feedback to our employees based on our
phone conversation - and that you're still waiting for us to provide them to
you for review.  What I mean by it is ridiculous to wait so long to
communicate performance feedback is : September?

Sorry for any confusion.  Don't take things so personally - I'm venting at
the process, not the people.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Hector McLoughlin @ ENRON                           09/01/2000 12:33 PM

To: Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Mid-Year PRC

Ann Marie is our new HR Analyst on rotation with our HR team.
The phrase, "We still need to review 51 "Satisfactory" evaluations", was a
disclosure to Sally that the 51 evaluations have not been forwarded to HR for
review.   I did not mean to imply that we were holding any evaluations
because we have provided same or next day turn around on the evaluations that
I received.
As I read the e-mail, I am concerned that you might be under the impression
that I have not provided quick turn-around to one or more members of your
group.   If that is the case and I have not misinterpreted your e-mail, I
would like the opportunity to address the issue with your staff so that I can
correct the situation.   Has a manager told you that I held up an evaluation?
I do not have any "satisfactory" evaluations in my possesion that I am
reviewing at this time.
I wish you had told me of any issues that you perceived were delaying your
evaluations because frankly, it was Sally that wanted us to review the
satisfactory or below evaluations.
Thanks for bringing the matter to my attention.   I was not aware that you
thought the situation had become ridiculous and I would like to do everything
possible to avoid giving you that impression.
hgm

Mary Solmonson@ECT
09/01/2000 12:04 PM
To: Hector McLoughlin/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Mid-Year PRC

I don't know who AnneMarie is, but we just went ahead and did our
Satisfactory evals.  It is ridiculous to wait so long to communicate
performance feedback.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT on 09/01/2000
12:01 PM ---------------------------

AnneMarie Allex@ENRON
08/29/2000 03:16 PM
Sent by: AnneMarie Allex@ENRON
To: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron,
James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, bob.m.hall@enron.com
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector
McLoughlin/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Mid-Year PRC

I would like to update you on the progress we have made on Energy Ops
mid-year review process.  All of the "Needs Improvement" evaluations have
been executed except for two which will be executed before the 9/1 deadline.
We still need to review 51 "Satisfactory" evaluations.  Our target date for
this process is September 1st.   Please forward your "Satisfactory"
evaluations  to myself or Hector McLoughlin by September 1st so we can review
them and move forward in the process.  Thank you for your help.

Anne Marie Allex


Nick,

The plan is OK, subject to unforeseen complications.
My flight from London was delayed and I had to spend a night in Newark, NJ.
My schedule for today was disrupted and I had to postpone my departure till
Friday
morning. I should be at San Francisco around 10:00 a.m. if there is no delay.
I should be able to meet you at noon at your office.

Please, confirm the meeting both to my office E-mail address and my private
address
(vkaminski@aol.com). Can you give me the phone number
at which I can reach you on Friday if there is a delay?

Look forward to meeting you.

Vince

Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 02/24/2000 02:31:38 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc: bambos@stanford.Stanford.EDU
Subject: [Fwd: Stanford Meeting]

Vince, is this plan OK? Thanks. Nick

Nick Bambos wrote:
>
> Vince,
>
> Friday is fine. We can have lunch at the Faculty Club - you'll
> be my guest. Shall we meet in my office in Packard 238 and
> walk to the Faculty Club?
>
> Nick
>
> Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > Nick,
> >
> > I shall be in Stanford for Parents' Weekend (my son is a junior at
> > Stanford).
> > I plan to be on the campus Friday through Sunday this week. I shall be
glad
> > to meet you anytime during the weekend. What about  a lunch on Friday?
> > I would like to talk to you about Enron underwriting  research projects by
> > the graduate students
> > at your department.
> >
> > You can reach me at Stanford at my son's phone number: 650 497 6938.
> > Please, let me know if you are free for lunch and I shall make the
> > reservation
> >
> > Vince
> >
> > Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 02/22/2000 12:54:15 PM
> >
> > To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> > cc:   Ravi.Thuraisingham.Enron_Communications@enron.com,
gappy@stanford.edu
> > Subject:  Stanford Meeting
> >
> > Dear Vince,
> >
> > Giuseppe tells me that you will be visiting Stanford soon
> > and you you would like to meet with me. I would definitely
> > be glad to meet you and talk further.
> >
> > Would you please let me know about the time of your visit
> > and your availability to meet. I look forward to seeing you.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Nick
> >
> > PS: Giuseppe and Amy came back very impressed by you are doing at Enron!
> > Thanks for hosting them.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/07/2001 10:32 PM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	02/07/2001 07:45 PM

		 To: IEP <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Powerplant Siting Legislation Announced

Greetings...Senator Sher and his bipartisan Senate Coalition held a press
conference endorsing SB28X, the powerplant streamlining bill.

Jan was available to respond to press on behalf of IEP following the press
conference -- commending the legislature for their efforts in promoting the
streamlining of siting power plants.

IEP will be suggesting amendments to this bill.

Thanks,
Jean

--
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates, Inc.
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)

____________________________________________
SENATOR BYRON SHER
11th District

BIPARTISAN SENATE COALITION

ENDORSES POWERPLANT STREAMLINING BILL

Contact: Kip Lipper
916/445-6747

A bipartisan group of key senators announced their support today for
legislation to speed up powerplant siting without compromising environmental
protections. The legislation, SB 28X, jointly authored by Senators Byron
Sher (D-Stanford), Debra Bowen (D-Marina Del Rey), and Jim Battin (R-La
Quinta), is an important element of the Senate's comprehensive proposals
designed to help address the state's ongoing energy crisis.

"This measure is an important and urgent step forward in our efforts to
increase electricity supply in the state without sacrificing public health
and environmental protections," Sher said. "I'm pleased that our colleagues
from the other side of the aisle have agreed to work together in a
bipartisan effort to ensure that California's energy needs can be met
quickly and efficiently."

SB 28X enacts into law a series of changes designed to streamline siting of
new generation while ensuring full compliance with key environmental laws
and regulations (see attached summary).

The bill will be heard in the Senate early next week.

#     #     #

SB 28x, as proposed to be amended:

1. Establishes expedited siting process for so-called "repowers" of existing
powerplants to generate new emissions offsets and to meet state energy
demand.

2. Establishes expedited siting process for single-cycle peaker power plants
which can be brought on line quickly to meet state energy demand.

3. Allows powerplant approval process to begin while air emission offsets
are being obtained for powerplants needed to meet state energy demand.

4. Eliminate standby charges for distributed generation needed to meet state
energy demand.

5. Requires State to backfill 100% of property tax to local jurisdictions
that site new generating facilities sited to meet state energy demand.

6. Establishes an expedited process for retrofitting existing generation
facilities to
generate new offsets so that these facilities may run more frequently
without
violating air quality laws.

7. Establishes new process allowing air districts to postpone offset
requirements on powerplants provided the owners/operators of the plants post
funding to mitigate air emissions and agree to obtain emissions by the
earliest feasibledate.

8. Directs the state Air Resources Board to develop a statewide Air
Pollution Offset Bank and make information on the offsets available to
powerplant developers and other interested parties.

9.Requires air districts to establish expedited permit processes for the
permitting of standby electrical generation facilities and distributed
generation facilities.

10.Requires local agencies to provide initial written comments on proposed
powerplants within 45 days after filing of a siting application and final
comments within 90 days (current law sets no statutory deadline for such
comments).

11. Requires the CEC to take into account positive environmental, economic,
and system reliability benefits of new powerplants.

12.Provides that the State Supreme Court shall be the court of original
jurisdiction for legal challenges to CEC.

13.Requires the CEC to adopt by regulation an ex parte rule which provides
greater flexibility for communication among the public and parties to siting
proceedings provided such communications are disclosed on the record.

 - Sher/Senate Press Conference


Well, of course we have our get together with my family on Thanksgiving Day
but that's about it.
So, maybe we can go to dinner that Friday or Saturday.  Would that work for
you?  Let's just finalize things closer to time.  Have a good day!

-Amy

-----Original Message-----
From: Clint.Dean@enron.com [mailto:Clint.Dean@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 7:20 AM
To: amy.hood@us.brann.com
Subject: RE: Introducing Miss Lauren Michele

Thanks for the pics.  I hope they are doing well.  I will be up there for
Thanksgiving.  I don't know how much y'all have going on that weekend, but
I would like to get together if possible.  Just let me know what you are
thinking.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2001
03:07 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Click at Home @ ENRON                           05/07/2001 10:20 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Employees United States
cc:
Subject: ClickAtHome Portal is HERE!

Version 2.0 of the ClickAtHome Portal is now available!
 Log into www.clickathome.net now, from work or home!

Access the PEP System through the portal!
 Choose your reviewers and fill out your evaluations in the comfort and
privacy of your home!

Outlook Web Access and eHRonline will be available SOON!

The ClickAtHome portal is fully customizable for you!
 YOU choose the content on each page, as well as the look and feel!

Note: the ClickAtHome portal must be launched through an Internet Explorer
browser, 5.0 or higher.


Almost all trades executed under Merrill Lynch have been assigned to
Allegheny.  It is my understanding that Merrill will no longer be trading
financial or physical power.  The deals that Merrill will retain are as
follows
217397
425780
513602
517785
528054

If you have questions, please let me know.


Vince,

Thank you for forwarding the following messages.  I am sorry that I am just
now getting back to you, my lotus notes was down all afternoon yesterday.

We currently have the Cal Berkeley General Presentation set for Wednesday,
October 18th at 7:00 p.m. which works out well because it is just prior to
the time deadline for students to submit their resumes.  The General
Presentation is a general overview of Enron, the Program, the interview
process, as well as a chance for students to meet and chat with Enron reps.
Since this is the first year that we are recruiting from Cal Berkeley, I
think that it is important that I attend this event on campus so that I can
answer any interview process questions.  I will check the schedule and see if
it is possible to move the presentation to the 23rd.  The only negative is
that I will not be able to attend because I will be conducting interviews at
Rice that day.  Also, it is very difficult to find a location to hold the
presentation, and I need to check on location availability on the 23rd.

However, I do think that we should take advantage of the seminar on campus.
This may mean that they are two seperate trips to campus.  Perhaps, we can
also set up some other presentations for the 23rd or even the Monday prior.
Although I would like to be able to attend the class/seminar presentations, I
don't think that it is as vital as the General Presentation.

What are your thoughts?

Thanks,
Ashley

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
08/24/2000 08:58 AM
To: "Shmuel Oren" <OREN@IEOR.Berkeley.edu>
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron

Shmuel,

Thanks for the message. I am working with our recruiter, Ashley Baxter,
to finalize the date of the trip. I shall shoot for October the 23rd
if this date works for the rest of our team.

Vince

"Shmuel Oren" <OREN@IEOR.Berkeley.edu> on 08/23/2000 11:46:19 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron

Dear Vince.
I sent you a reply earlier this month but I haven't heard from you about the
date of your visit. Our department has a Seminar every Monday. If you can
schedule your visit on a Monday I would like to invite you to give a seminar
which will be attended by many of our graduate students and faculty and will
give you an opportunity to tell them about your program. With sufficient
lead-time I can advertise the seminar in the Hass school to their financial
engineering students.
Shmuel.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Shmuel S. Oren, Professor
Dept. of Industrial Engineering
        and Operations Research
4117 Etcheverry Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-1777
e-mail: oren@ieor.berkeley.edu
phone: (510) 642-1836 or 5484
Fax:      (510) 642-1403
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

----- Original Message -----
From: <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
To: <OREN@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>; <vkamins@enron.com>;
<ashley.baxter@enron.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 10:59 AM
Subject: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron

> Shmuel,
>
> I hope you remember me. I visited you together with Aram Sogomonian, a
> good friend of mine, a few years ago. I am currently responsible, among
> other things, for recruiting graduates with finance and/or technical
> backgrounds at the University of Berkeley. I would be glad to give you a
> call and talk more about the details of our program. My colleague,
> AshleyBaxter, from the Analyst/Associate Program at Enron would join me
> as well.
>
> I am sending you a copy of the brochure about the Analyst / Associate
> Program.
>
> Vince Kaminski
>
>
> Vincent Kaminski
> Managing Director - Research
> Enron Corp.
> 1400 Smith Street
> Room EB1962
> Houston, TX 77002-7361
>
> Phone: (713) 853 3848
> Fax  :  (713) 646 2503
> E-mail: vkamins@enron.com
>


Gina,

Have we figured out what happened here?  I haven't heard anything in a while.

Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000 11:29
AM ---------------------------

Michelle Cash
07/13/2000 11:04 AM
To: Brian Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kathryn
McLean/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Performance Review Process

I agree with Brian.  I recently learned that someone can "hack" into the
emeet site and pretend to be Jeff Skilling (as I discussed with you, Brian,
this morning).  So, we probably should start with that group to see if there
are any gaps in the email system.

I would suggest that someone from Net Works -- Roberto DeLeon or his crew--
would be the appropriate technical support for this endeavor.  I agree with
Brian that the focus should be on the impersonation of the office of the
chairman and not the content of the email itself.

I am happy to assist in any way you would like.

Michelle

Brian Schaffer@ENRON
07/13/2000 10:28 AM
To: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn
McLean/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Performance Review Process

David:

 I am less concerned about the substantive comments of the message as I am
about the "forgery" of the ECT OTC mailbox.  Unless Michelle or another
opines differently, I believe it is incumbent upon us to determine who
mis-used that e-mail address.  This is not to say that an employee should be
disciplined for raising complaints; obviously that would be retaliatory in
nature.  And so, if this person had simply left an anonymous voice message or
old-fashioned letter with OTC, I would have no issue.  But, here, this person
has sent a communication ostensibly from ECT's OTC and apparently has access
to do so in the future.  In my mind, that activity must be addressed and
ceased.

 I suspect that it is technologically feasible to determine the source of the
message.  Unless there is objection, I would recommend an investigation
(which my group can do) to determine the author.

Brian

David Oxley@ECT
07/13/2000 09:59 AM
To: Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn
McLean/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Performance Review Process

Can we discuss below please? Please review message and give me your comments.

Given it is anonymous it's difficult to respond.

David
---------------------- Forwarded by David Oxley/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 09:57
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Kay Chapman                           07/13/2000 09:50 AM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, David
Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Rhonna Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherri
Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Performance Review Process

This memo went to Corp and Sherri forwarded for us to handle.

Thanks,

Kay

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sherri Sera @ ENRON                           07/13/2000 09:21 AM

To: Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Performance Review Process

Kay, per our discussion, here's the e-mail.  You should probably find out who
has access to that ECT Office of the Chairman mailbox and who forwarded this
up to the Corp. Office of the Chairman.  This should be handled with ENA.
Thanks, SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 07/13/2000
09:14 AM ---------------------------

Office Chairman on 07/13/2000 08:04:17 AM
To: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Performance Review Process

---------------------- Forwarded by Office Chairman/Corp/Enron on 07/13/2000
08:04 AM ---------------------------

Office of the Chairman@ECT
07/06/2000 10:01 AM
To: Office Chairman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Performance Review Process

After having lived through another PRC process, it has become exceedingly
obvious that there are several issues that need improvement in the process.
With all our discussions about Communication within Enron, I am now
communicating to your level issues that I have communicated in years past to
other parties without change.

1)  Enron needs to lay out the groundrules in total that will pertain to the
upcoming review period and communicate them in advance of the review period,
not during the PRC process to be applied after the performance has already
occurred and upon which each employee cannot change their behavior for such
review period.  This is only fair to our employees so that they know the
criteria upon which they will be evaluated in advance.

2)  The PRC system needs to be changed whereby any and all people that are
willing to provide input on performance of any individual can be done without
a bunch of red tape.  There is this idea that unsolicited input works within
the system, but it requires too much effort to get throught the hurdles and
it still requires that the supervisor approve such input.  There needs to be
an unobstructed communication line for this input.  The theory of upward
feedback should also be questioned.  I have never been asked to provide input
to my direct boss (President of Houston Pipe Line) in all the years that I
have worked for that position.  Are Managing Directors exempt from this
process?  This issue is also addressed in #3 below in a different manner.
How can appropriate feedback be given if those that work directly with
individuals are not given the opportunity to communicate?

3)  There is still way too much preferrential selection of reviewers in the
process.  There should be set out for each employee a listing of absolute
minimum reviewers (certain people) that must be solicited, depending upon the
job function.  I have seen too many circumstances where the obvious people to
provide input were not even solicited.  There was one individual that
partially worked directly for another during this past review period and was
not even asked for input.

4)  What constitutes an average employee and what that category is within our
PRC definitions is still being debated.  It has been described by several HR
representatives that it is either/and both Strong or Satisfactory.  Neither
one of the definitions describes such performance as "simply doing the job".
Because of such confusion, the reviewers when they provide input do not
effectively and precisely rate the employee.  What we end up with in the PRC
is an over-inflated representation of each employee and the committee has to
pull the entire group back a notch.  With better definitions and
communication to our employees on how to interpret the definitions, it will
give us a better process and set the standards in writing that seem to be
lacking.

Thanks for your listening ear.


CNG Transport from NIMO
Contract  5A1866
Term  11/1/99 - 3/31/00
MDQ  15957
Rate Sched FTNN
Demand Dec $5.7690       Jan  $5.7500      Feb 5.7510
Commodity $.0456 (CNG does not bill the commodity part of GRI, also the
commodity rate does not change during the term of the deal)
Fuel  2.28 %
Note  This should be valued at generic North to North space.

CNG
Marq Demand $6.2500
Volume  15957
Note:  We have no value for this much MARQ.  We might be able to use about
3,000 dth of this.  I have a call in to Greg Synder at CNG.  Greg is in the
rates group.  I believe it works like this; we pay max IT for gathering (
$.1980 for Jan),  If you have MARQ, the rate drops to $.1440.  IT is a pain
to nominate.  I will verify that this is the way it works with Greg.

CGAS
Contract 65403
Term  11/1/99 - 4/30/2001
MDQ  19293
Rate  $4.8621
Rec Point Leach
Del Point BG&E


it said if you do that it is bad luck


pls print.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/11/2000
08:03 AM ---------------------------

Debbie Moseley
12/08/2000 04:16 PM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Paul Cherry/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, John
Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery
Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Ferrell, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Gerrad Heep/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stanley
Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike
McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Heather Mueck/AA/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ETS Hedged and Open Positions/Financial Exposure Positions

Please Note:

We have changed the correlation of the Transwestern's hedges to the same
index(El Paso Permian) that the derivatives were transacted.  We feel it is
appropriate to make this correlation change due to management's anticipation
to make the 2001 sales at an El Paso Permian index.  Due to this change TW
has a perfect correlation, therefore the associated Value at Risk  will be
zero.


Paul's birthday is on Saturday, March 2nd.  We will celebrate this great occasion with a surprise donut hour on tomorrow morning at 8:30a in our open area near me.

Please plan on eating a few donuts with Paul on tomorrow morning.

Remember, this is a surprise....  A card will be circulating this afternoon.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


HBA Calls for Volunteers - Your Help is Needed

The HBA needs volunteer attorneys to help answer legal questions and provide
general guidance to members of the public dealing with the aftermath of
recent flooding.  Your help is needed to staff special LegalLine Sessions,
to respond to phone calls received through the SBOT/HBA hot line and to
provide information at relief centers.  The HBA is accepting volunteers with
hours or days to contribute.  Read on for further details about these
volunteer opportunities and to learn about training opportunities.

Special LegalLine:
When:
		Thursday, June 28, 2001  --  4:45 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. and from
6:45 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.

Thursday, July 12, 2001   --  4:45 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. and from 6:45 p.m. to
9:00 p.m.

Thursday, July 26, 2001   --  4:45 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. and from 6:45 p.m. to
9:00 p.m.

Thursday, August 9, 2001 --  4:45 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. and from 6:45 p.m. to
9:00 p.m.

		Thursday, August 23, 2001 --  4:45 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. and
from 6:45 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.

		 Attorneys may volunteer for one or more shifts.
Where:
HBA offices, 1001 Fannin, Suite 1300
Other:
Resource materials will be provided. Volunteers from past flood LegalLine
Programs have answered questions involving landlord/tenant issues, consumer
law, insurance matters and other areas of the law. Attorneys do not provide
their identities to callers.

To Schedule Volunteer Service or for further information:
E-mail the Elizabeth Patrolia at elizabethp@hba.org or contact Lucy Fisher
at
(713) 759-1133

1-800-540-7030 Assistance
When:
Monday through Friday
9:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m.
Attorneys may volunteer for one or more hours during these periods.

Where:
Houston Volunteer Lawyer Program offices, 712 Main, 27th Floor

Other:
Resource materials will be provided. Volunteers have answered questions
involving landlord/tenant issues, consumer law, insurance matters and other
areas of the law.  Attorneys need not provide their identities to callers.

To Schedule Volunteer Service or for further information:
E-mail the HVLP at Barbara.Mcmahon@ehvlp.org or contact Barbara McMahon at
713/228-0735 ext. 111.

Information Booths and Town Meetings:
When:
As requested by FEMA and other relief agencies.  We anticipate a time
commitment of from 1-3 hours once the attorney is on site.

Where:
FEMA Disaster Recovery Centers.  Locations will vary.

Other:
Resource materials will be provided. Volunteers should anticipate questions
involving landlord/tenant issues, consumer law, insurance matters and other
areas of the law.

To Schedule Volunteer Service or for further information:
E-mail kays@hba.org or contact Kay Sim at 713/759-1133

Training:
Information concerning the time and location of training sessions will be
posted on the HBA Web site at http://www.hba.org and  may be obtained by
calling the HBA at (713) 759-1133. Training will cover a variety of legal
issues including but not limited to landlord/tenant, consumer protection,
insurance, employment law and lost documents.  MCLE credit is being applied
for from the State Bar of Texas.

Thank you for volunteering,

Co-Chairs, HBA Disaster Relief Committee:

Lynette Fons		Telephone: 713/623-0887	E-mail: lfons@bmpllp.com
Andrew Strong	Telephone: 713/662-9083	E-mail: astrong@cg-law.com
Sharon Butcher	Telephone: 713/853-7224	E-mail: Sharon.Butcher@enron.com


Not enough experience.  Mark


Could you check this out?  It should be on my Mastercard
-----Original Message-----
From: Sally Cornwell [mailto:cornwell@ipams.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Whitt, Mark
Subject: VISA

Mark -
Your credit card payment to IPAMS for the CBM Workshop and Symposium declined.  Could you please call or email IPAMS to verify the card number and expiration date?  Then we will try again.

Thank you,

Sally Cornwell
303 623 0987


Kay,

This appears to be relatively simple ( and I know that we wanted to have ABB
haul and install) but I am not at all familiar with the ABB Contract.
Would you mind taking a quick look to make sure that the letter is properly
drafted?  Also, I wonder whether this document still needs to be signed given
that the transformers are already in Austin at the site.  Maybe it has
already been executed.

Stuart

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	11/13/2000 08:53 AM

		 To: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Authorization for Haul & Install Option at Austin Project

If it says Austin, it must be yours....

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 08:52
AM ---------------------------
From: Kathleen Clark@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/13/2000 08:04 AM
To: Mike.coleman@enron.com
cc: Eric Booth/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roger.tietz@enron.com,
Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Authorization for Haul & Install Option at Austin Project

Mike:

Attached is a draft letter which provides authorization to ABB for the haul &
install option at Austin.

After it has been signed, please send me a copy for my files.

Thank you.
Kathy


can't wait.

	Kathleen E Magruder@EES
	12/11/2000 02:22 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: CA legislature

my last trip was planned a day in advance.  I promise to give you more notice
next time.  I expect I'll be in CA a LOT next year with all the activity
going on out there.  You'll have a chance to buy me at least one meal.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

March 23, 2001 5:00pm through March 26, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  5:15:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  3:15:00 PM PT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:15:00 PM
London
Outage:  Decommission CORPHOU-02B
Environments Impacted:  Corp Logins
Purpose: The SAM size on this DC has increased beyond recommended limits.
There is no real reason for us to keep this DC online anymore.
Backout: Bring back online
Contact(s):  Keith Meurer    713-853-1743

Impact:  ENS
Time:  Sun 3/25/2001 at  3:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 3/25/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT
 Sun 3/25/2001 at  1:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 3/25/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 3/25/2001 at  9:00:00 PM London thru Sun 3/25/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Change VLANS for the EES networks at Ardmore
Environments Impacted:  EES
Purpose: Part of the re-design, due to problems with the OC3's
Backout: change vlans back to the old numbers
Contact(s):  Scott Shishido    713-853-3780

Impact:  ENS
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at    9:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  10:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 3/24/2001 at  5:00:00 AM London thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Add redundancy to the ETS server network
Environments Impacted:  ETS
Purpose: Currently the ETS server network 172.30.10.0 has no redundant links
the the routers. If one switch goes down the entire network goes down.
Backout: none
Contact(s):  Scott Shishido    713-853-3780

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 3/24/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 3/25/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 3/24/2001 at   9:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/24/2001 at    10:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 3/25/2001 at  5:00:00 AM London thru Sun 3/25/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Replace ENRON.COM edge routers
Environments Impacted:  Internet
Purpose: Replace hardware with faster processing units.  IOS Software upgrade
to remove potential security vulnerability.
Backout: Put existing hardware back in production.
Contact(s):  John Shupak          713-853-7943
  Bryan Aubuchon    713-345-8446

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA:
Impact:  Market Data
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  9:45:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  7:45:00 PM PT
 Sat 3/24/2001 at  12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  3:45:00 AM London
Outage:  CQG_DDA Upgrade
Environments Impacted:  CQG Digital users
Purpose: Enable migration off of Legacy satellite systems.
Backout: N/A
Contact(s):  John Sieckman    713-345-7862

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  12:00:00 AM
Outage:  Cleanup CDPD (Air Card) Configuration
Environments Impacted:  Corp.
Purpose: Running out of available addresses for air cards. Clean up
configuration on CDPD router/ Change
the method used to translate the aircards IP addresses.
See Change Request  # JW918 for IP addresses.
Backout: apply old config
Contact(s):  Jon Werner    713-853-6742

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  12:00:00 AM
London
Outage:  SysAdmiral Master Server Move
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: This server move is to replace the failed server that occurred last
weekend. The current location for the master machine online is in 3448. Since
it is on a development segment it has to be moved back into the production
area.
We will need only one hour to move the machine since it it is replacing a
1600 with a 1600. Rails and racking can be reused without rewiring anything.
Backout: Rerack in current location.
Contact(s):  Rusty Cheves    713-345-3798

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  12:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  10:00:00 AM PT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  6:00:00 PM London
Outage:  OS and Disk upgrade, patch maintenance and migration to T-3 for
server titania.
Environments Impacted:  Oracle development
Purpose: Need for additional storage and improved performance.
Backout: shutdown the system
reconnect the old disks
restore the old OS from tape
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


Attached is a one page summary on Ross.  Look forward to speaking with you
this afternoon at 4:15pm.  Thanks.  SR:-)


Please refer to the revised credit worksheet for terms to be included within
the referenced confirmation.

thanks
brant

Brant Reves
10/10/2000 09:18 AM
To: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Delta Petroleum Corp. Omnibus Confirmation

Please refer to the attached credit worksheet for terms to be included within
the confirmation of trade q27454.  Let me know if I can be of any further
assistance.

thanks
brant


Attached is PIRA's Gas Flash.  Unauthorized distribution is prohibited.

Please direct questions about this report to: Greg Shuttlesworth (Email:
greg@pira.com), Tom Howard (EMail: tazh@pira.com), Richard Redash (Email:
Rich@pira.com), Nobu Tarui (Email: nobuo@pira.com) or Jane Hsu (Email:
jane@pira.com).  All can be reached at (212) 686-6808.

Contact John Graziano regarding PIRA report distribution at (212) 686-6808,
Email: jgraziano@pira.com.

 - aga042501.pdf


IEP issued the following response to San Jose Mayor Gonzales' support of the
Metcalf Energy Center. ??Below is also a copy of Calpine's release.

Thanks,
Jean

Independent Energy Producers Respond to ?
San Jose Mayor Gonzales? Support of Metcalf Energy Center

???Metcalf power plant developers, Calpine Corporation and Bechtel
Enterprises, reached an agreement earlier today with San Jose Mayor Ron
Gonzales . a decision that could help bring 600-megawatts of critically
needed clean, efficient electricity to the San Jose region and California .
enough power to light 600,000 homes.

???In response, Jan Smutny-Jones, Executive Director of the Independent
Energy Producers, said:

???"We commend Mayor Gonzales? leadership in advocating a real solution to
help solve California?s current electricity crisis . a decision that will
help bring desperately needed power on-line to serve the citizens of the
South Bay.

???"This crisis can only be resolved if we all work together to find real
solutions, instead of pointing fingers . which only creates an unstable
political and regulatory environment which will further complicate the supply
problem in California.

???"Mayor Gonzales is clearly taking a step in the right direction. ?We hope
others follow his lead."

# ????????# ????????#

Calpine/Bechtel's Metcalf Energy Center Receives Support From San Jose Mayor
Gonzales

PR Newswire
05/30/01, 5:15p
(Copyright , 2001, PR Newswire)

SAN JOSE, Calif., May 30 /PRNewswire/ -- Calpine Corporation (NYSE: CPN), the
San Jose, Calif.-based independent power company, and San Francisco
based-Bechtel Enterprises Holdings, Inc. announced an agreement with San Jose
Mayor Ron Gonzales that would help advance development of the proposed
600-megawatt Metcalf Energy Center (MEC), currently before the California
Energy Commission for licensing. Under the terms of the agreement, the City
of San Jose would support and provide municipal services for construction and
operations of MEC in the Coyote Valley of San Jose. The city would provide
all requested municipal services in a timely manner at standard rates and
terms applicable to similar users, and it would process annexation of the
portion of the site not already within the city limits. The agreement also
allows for MEC to provide additional benefits for the community and local
businesses. The San Jose City Council will consider the agreement at its
regular meeting scheduled June 5.

"This agreement provides resolution of the remaining concerns we have heard
from local officials, developers and the community-at-large," said Curt
Hildebrand, Calpine Vice President, General Manager, Calpine/Bechtel Joint
Development. "We are pleased to have forged this lasting partnership with the
City of San Jose and the community by more widely sharing the benefits of the
Metcalf Energy Center."

The 600-megawatt, natural gas-fueled Metcalf Energy Center will significantly
benefit electricity consumers by adding clean, efficient and urgently needed
power generation directly into the South Bay energy market.

The Metcalf Energy Center is a development of San Jose-based Calpine
Corporation, one of the nation's leading independent providers of electric
power, and Bechtel Enterprises Holdings, Inc., the development, financing and
ownership affiliate of the Bechtel organization, one of the world's premier
engineering and construction companies.

About Calpine

Calpine Corporation, based in San Jose, Calif., is dedicated to providing
customers with reliable and competitively priced electricity. Calpine is
focused on clean, efficient, natural gas-fired generation and is the world's
largest producer of renewable geothermal energy. Calpine has launched the
largest power development program in North America. To date, the company has
approximately 32,200 megawatts of base load capacity and 7,200 megawatts of
peaking capacity in operation, under construction, pending acquisitions and
in announced development in 29 states and Canada. The company was founded in
1984 and is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
CPN. For more information about Calpine, visit its Website at www.calpine.com.

This news release discusses certain matters that may be considered
"forward-looking" statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements regarding the intent,
belief or current expectations of Calpine Corporation ("the Company") and its
management. Prospective investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve a number of
risks and uncertainties that could materially affect actual results such as,
but not limited to, (i) changes in government regulations, including pending
changes in California, and anticipated deregulation of the electric energy
industry, (ii) commercial operations of new plants that may be delayed or
prevented because of various development and construction risks, such as a
failure to obtain financing and the necessary permits to operate or the
failure of third-party contractors to perform their contractual obligations,
(iii) cost estimates that are preliminary and which actual cost may be higher
than estimated, (iv) the assurance that the Company will develop additional
plants, (v) a competitor's development of a lower-cost gas-fired power plant,
(vi) receipt of regulatory approvals or (vii) the risks associated with
marketing and selling power from power plants in the newly competitive energy
market. Prospective investors are also referred to the other risks identified
from time to time in the Company's reports and registration statements filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Perry had asked me whether this contract had ROFR or not because he thinks it should be terminated, but CAS is still reserving capacity for the contract because it has a ROFR flag on it in CBS.  I think that this contract does not have ROFR, but could you confirm this for me?  If my memory is correct, I thought that this agreement was always done just a month or two at a time and that at the end of each term it was negotiated with the price desk (& more recently TK) to roll for another month or so.  If I'm thinking of the right contract, that would mean that it did not have a ROFR (because it was not for a year or longer) and that it terminated 3/31/2001.

Could you check the contract file for me and look at the amendment history to confirm that the agreement did not have a year or longer term?  If not, then this agreement should not have the ROFR contract on it.

Let me know.  Thanks!


EnronOnline passes one million transactions.  Woohoo!

Also in this issue:
Enron.com -- it's fabulously new and improved!
How Enron likes Bush's new energy policy
California update
What's going on in the French wholesale market?
Learn about caps -- not the ones you wear, of course.
What do Frank Gehry and Enron have in common?
Jeff leads in a dangerous time

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then click eBiz, and "eBiz May 25, 2001."


pls print.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 04/10/2000
05:59 PM ---------------------------

Steven Harris
04/10/2000 02:54 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Gallup One Time Payment

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron on 04/10/2000
02:53 PM ---------------------------

James Centilli
04/10/2000 02:35 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: David Foti/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Gallup One Time Payment

Please find attached an explanation of how the $2.8M was negotiated from Dave
Foti and myself.  The other file attached is the calculations per the
contracts we executed with ESC and the earnings impact, if we agree with ESC
new one time payment.

 The economic benefit  to be derived from this change may or may not be
achieved, because it is dependent on ESC and TW ability to avoid the peak
demand  charge.  ESC has an obligation in the contract to assist TW in
developing a system to monitor and avoid the peak demand charge.  If ESC
receives this benefit in  the one time payment, TW may lose any leverage we
have.  The demand payment includes full payment of these peak demand charges
with ESC rebating the
 cost on a monthly basis, if these charges are avoided.

 If we need to develop our negotiating strategy before we meet with ESC on
Wednesday, please advise.

 Dave Foti & James Centilli


Simon,

Please forward a copy of my Ken Rice presentation to Vince Kaminski.  Send
him the version with the white background.

Vince:

Thanks again for meeting with me today and I am pleased that you are
interested in discussing this opportunity in more detail.

Feel free to contact me should you have any questions.  As discussed, the
Enron Media / Advertising idea is being developed under EBS, but should
develop into its own business unit.

Enron Media / Advertising:
- Advertising Risk Book
- Physical Trades, supported by excess inventory from Cable Networks, Radio,
Network TV, etc.
- Media Buying Service
- Alliances with Advertising Agencies to sell Enron's "eyeballs" from our
customer / server - ISP relationships i.e., US West
- Agencies could endorse EBS to their customers (Ford GM, Procter & Gamble,
etc.) and become an Extended Enterprise for EBS and our EIN applications
- Enron's Capital, to fund Content Development for the networks and
Hollywood, which in turn would provide content for our pipes with licensing
and syndication rights.
- An Enron On Line B to B opportunity (You may want to review the following
sites: DoubleClick.com, Agency.com, AdAuction.com)

Mark and Kal:

Vince and I are meeting on Tuesday, March 28th @ 3:00 PM to further discuss
the development of the Enron Media /Advertising concept .  Can you join us to
provide a Customer and Agency perspective?

Regards,
Michael P. Horning


i think that i am going to take it easy tonight.  i am going to br tomorrow
so i need my rest.  are you going to the lsu game?  i cannot wait to get back
in town.  where are you guys going out afterwards?


This may be of interest to you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 06/03/99
05:15 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Timothy J Detmering" <tdetmer@ect.enron.com>
 06/03/99 04:23 PM

To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT
cc:
Subject: Coho $500mm lawsuit against Hicks Muse

---------------------- Forwarded by Timothy J Detmering/HOU/ECT on 06/03/99
04:22 PM ---------------------------

To:   Timothy J Detmering/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Coho $500mm lawsuit against Hicks Muse

Thought you might find this interesting.
I have printed out the Petition and Exhibits and highlighted the key points.
If
you want me to send it up your way, just send back an email.

==============================================================================
=======================================

Coho Energy Files Suit Against Hicks Muse Affiliates

DALLAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 27, 1999--Coho Energy Inc. (Nasdaq:COHO - news)
today announced that it has filed suit against five affiliates of
Hicks, Muse, Tate & Furst seeking damages of more than five hundred million
dollars ($500,000,000).

The suit, which was filed on Coho's behalf in state court by the noted Dallas
trial firm of Thomas & Culp, L.L.P., alleges that HM4, a limited partnership
formed by Hicks Muse on behalf of the Hicks, Muse, Tate & Furst Equity Fund
IV,
reneged on a contract to inject $250,000,000 of equity capital into the
Company.
 The deal would have
given HM4 control of Coho through the purchase of 41,666,666 shares of newly
issued common stock at $6.00 per share.

The suit alleges that HM4 waited until after Coho's public stockholders had
approved the agreement, then reneged on the deal at the last minute in order
to
renegotiate the price down to $4.00
per share in order to increase the number of shares that HM4 would have
received
 for the $250,000,000. Then according to the allegations, HM4 walked away from
the new agreement.

The Company has opened a Web page at www.coholawsuit.com in order to keep the
public and its stockholders informed of progress in the case. The petition
filed
 in court will be available in
full text at the Web site at approximately 2:00 p.m., CDT, today.


Greg - here is Randy's resume. He is the guy I was telling you about on
Friday as we were walking out of the building. I think he could make Enron a
lot of money.

Basil


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT on 06/29/2000 02:53
PM ---------------------------

Derek Davies
06/29/2000 09:25 AM
To: Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fishin

---------------------- Forwarded by Derek Davies/CAL/ECT on 06/29/2000 09:25
AM ---------------------------

Howard Sangwine
06/12/2000 05:55 PM
To: Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Ulf Ek/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fishin

You need sound ability with this one......

lew <<fishin.exe>>

 - fishin.exe


Joe,

It has to be the following week. My mistake.

Vince

Joseph Hrgovcic
03/29/2000 09:36 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Research lunch with Yannis

Vince,

 I've received your message and I'm coordinating with Yannis on the lunch.

Joe


Great.  You know this is a pure "lobbyist" meeting, right?  You may want to do by phone, if possible.  Your call.

-----Original Message-----
From: Comnes, Alan
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:11 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: IEP Board Special Session w/Contract Lobbyist on 12/13/01,
1-3:00 pm

OK.

Let them know I am planning on attending (I have and Enron-paid ticket in hand which I will use).

GAC

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:03 AM
To: Comnes, Alan; Kaufman, Paul
Subject: RE: IEP Board Special Session w/Contract Lobbyist on 12/13/01,
1-3:00 pm
Importance: High

Thanks, very much Alan.  Hedy, Bev and Scott are still technically on board until the end of the month, but that's fairly "ceremonial," so to speak.  Let's do this.  I'll give Hedy a call and see if they'd be willing to attend and report back. In my view, given the circumstances, if they've got conflicts and can't make it, I'm not inclinded to push it.  Sound reasonable?

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Comnes, Alan
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:33 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Kaufman, Paul
Subject: FW: IEP Board Special Session w/Contract Lobbyist on 12/13/01,
1-3:00 pm
Importance: High

Paul, Jeff:

I got on the IEP Board distribution list (Parquet is also on it).  Are there any actions we need to take with our Sacto lobbiests that I can help with?

Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: Carol Hudson [mailto:carol@iepa.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 7:40 AM
To: Alan Comnes (E-mail); Alex Sugaoka (E-mail); Bob Ellery (E-mail);
Bob Escalante (E-mail); Gates, Bob; Carol Hudson (E-mail); Carolyn A
Baker (E-mail); Charles Linthicum (E-mail); Curtis Kebler (E-mail);
Parquet, David; Douglas Kerner (E-mail); Duane Nelsen (E-mail); Ed Tomeo
(E-mail); Eric Eisenman (E-mail); Ernest J. Soczka (E-mail); Greg Blue
(E-mail); Hap Boyd (E-mail); Jack Pigott (E-mail); Jan Smutny-Jones
(E-mail); Joe Ronan (E-mail); John Stout (E-mail); Jonathan Weisgall
(E-mail); Katie Kaplan (E-mail); Kelly Lloyd (E-mail); Ken Hoffman
(E-mail); Kent Fickett (E-mail); Kent Palmerton (E-mail); Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail); Fillinger, Mark; Marty McFadden (E-mail); Paula Soos (E-mail);
Peter H. Weiner (E-mail); Randall J. Hickok (E-mail); Rick S. Koebbe
(E-mail); Roger Pelote (E-mail); Ross Ain (E-mail); Scott Sadler
(E-mail); Steve Ponder (E-mail); Steven Kelly (E-mail); William Carlson
(E-mail)
Subject: IEP Board Special Session w/Contract Lobbyist on 12/13/01,
1-3:00 pm
Importance: High

Dear IEP Board Member,

During the December 13th IEP Board Planning Meeting, a special session for
Board Members and your contract Lobbyist is being planned.  This special
session will be held between 1:00 pm and 3:00 p.m., Sterling Hotel,
Sacramento.   This memo is sent to you as a notice so that, if possible, you
can arrange for your contract Lobbyist to be available during that time.
Please don't hesitate to contact IEP if you have any questions.

Carol Hudson, Executive Assistant
Independent Energy Producers Assn.
1215 K  Street, Suite 900
Sacramento, CA 95814
PH: 916-448-9499
FX: 916-448-0182
carol@iepa.com


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN"    "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd">

<TITLE>NYTimes HTML E-Mail</TITLE>

<FORM method="GET" action="http://query.nytimes.com/search/query">

Search NYTimes.com
<INPUT TYPE="text" SIZE="15"  name="query" MAXLENGTH="32">
<select name="date">
<option value="Today">Today's News <option value="site1week">Past Week <option value="past30days" selected="">Past 30 Days <option value="past90days">Past 90 Days <option value="past365days">Past Year <option value="Full">Since 1996 </select>
<input type="image" name="submit" value=" Search" src="http://graphics.nytimes.com/images/global/global_search/gs_submit.gif" width="18" height="19" border="0" alt="submit" align="top">

</FORM>

January 9, 2002

Yesterday we experienced a disruption in the delivery of
Today's Headlines. As a result, a number of our readers did
not receive their regularly scheduled e-mail. We apologize
for the inconvenience.

QUOTE OF THE DAY

"I thought it could run for like five years."

JERRY ORBACH,who was in "The Fantasticks" when it opened 42 years ago. It
closes Sunday.

NATIONAL

Justices Unanimously Narrow the Scope of Disabilities Act

The Supreme Court ruled that to qualify as disabled a person must have substantial limitations on abilities that are "central to daily life."

Prosecutor Willing to Deal in Child Drownings Case

The state is willing to forgo the death penalty if Andrea Yates drops her insanity plea, a prosecutor said.

Hijacker Got a Speeding Ticket

A leader of the Sept. 11 hijackings aroused no   suspicion when he was stopped for speeding in Maryland two days before the attacks.

MORE NATIONAL NEWS

Private DVD theater puts a floating 6-foot screen right before your eyes

The latest electronic technology has created i-glasses, the virtual theater that provides private showing of DVD and other video sources.

INTERNATIONAL

U.S. Is Building Up Its Military Bases in Afghan Region

In a sign that American forces are settling in, the United States and its allies are building an air base in Kyrgyzstan and improving bases in two other countries in the region.

Pentagon Study Urges Arms Shift, From Nuclear to High-Tech

A classified Pentagon review outlines a new post-cold-war concept of deterrence that is intended to justify slashing the United States' nuclear arsenal.

Pakistan May Be Unable to Calm Kashmir

Many militants in Jammu and Kashmir, India's only predominantly Muslim state, say they will continue the fight against India on their own.

MORE INTERNATIONAL NEWS

BUSINESS

U.S. Ends Car Plan on Gas Efficiency; Looks to Fuel Cells

The Bush administration is walking away from a project to develop high-mileage gasoline-fueled vehicles and will support a plan to develop hydrogen-based fuel cells.

Thousands of Jobs Expected to Be Cut at G.M. and Ford

The two largest American automakers are expected to announce the elimination of at least 15,000 jobs this week.

Surge in Bias Cases Punishes Insurers, and Premiums Rise

Companies insuring against harassment or discrimination claims are jacking up their rates  some doubling or tripling them  while a few have quit the business entirely.

MORE BUSINESS NEWS

TECHNOLOGY

Court Orders Motorola to Pay $300 Million to Banks

A federal judge has ordered Motorola to pay $300 million to Chase Manhattan Bank and several other lenders to repay part of a loan to the company's troubled satellite telephone venture, Iridium.

New Rules Help AOL Time Warner, but Put It to a Test

New accounting rules make it easier to compare AOL with hundreds of other companies with profits. And by comparison, its shares may look very expensive.

U.S. Ends Car Plan on Gas Efficiency; Looks to Fuel Cells

The Bush administration is walking away from a project to develop high-mileage gasoline-fueled vehicles and will support a plan to develop hydrogen-based fuel cells.

MORE TECHNOLOGY NEWS

POLITICS

Education Bill Urges New Emphasis on Phonics

The education bill President Bush signed into   law includes an ambitious federal commitment to teaching reading, with a focus on phonics.

White House Seeking Funds to Dismantle Nuclear Arms

The Bush administration plans to ask Congress for 37 percent more money this year than it sought a year ago to safeguard and dispose of nuclear materials.

Judge Overrules Decision Allowing Logging of Burned Trees

A federal judge in Montana has blocked a Bush   administration decision that would have allowed logging at the Bitterroot National Forest.

MORE POLITICS NEWS

SPORTS

Gonzalez Goes to Rangers

Juan Gonzalez agreed in principle to a two-year, $24 million contract with his old team, the Texas Rangers.

Hall of Fame Admits Smith; Carter                                                                                Left Out

Ozzie Smith became the 37th player elected to the Hall of Fame in his first year of eligibility. Gary Carter narrowly missed election.

Team Owners Defend Selig

Baseball owners defended Commissioner Bud Selig amid suggestions that he played a role in a loan that could create a conflict of interest in baseball's contraction plan.

MORE SPORTS NEWS

ARTS

'The Fantasticks' Is Ending Its 42-Year Run

On Sunday evening, after 17,162 performances, "The Fantasticks" will do the one thing that few thought it capable of. It will close.

New York Philharmonic Moves Into a New Era

The Philharmonic's 2002-3 season will be the first under its new director, Lorin Maazel, who will conduct 11 of the orchestra's 34 subscription weeks.

Downtown, Hit Brightens an Emerging Playwright

Melissa James Gibson's "[sic]" has been extended twice at SoHo Rep, and several commercial producers have expressed interest in moving it to a larger theater.

MORE ARTS NEWS

NY REGION

Accord Reached in School Bias Suit Against Yonkers

An agreement has been reached in a lawsuit that will give $300 million to the Yonkers' school system, officials said.

Bloomberg, Indebted to No One, Is Friendly With Few

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg has none of the obligations that other politicians carry, but very few are obligated to him either.

Terms Are Up, but They Land on Their Feet

Borough presidents and City Council members that were pushed out of office by term limits have managed to avoid unemployment.

MORE NY REGION NEWS

OP-ED

Who's Home, Who's Not

By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

Two world-renowned figures have   been on the run, living in "undisclosed locations" since Sept. 11:  Osama bin Laden and Dick Cheney.

Just a Little Honest

By  MAUREEN DOWD

CNN made a terrible gaffe when it finally spit out what we all know, but   what the networks go to ludicrous   lengths to deny: They hire and promote news stars based on looks and sex appeal.

Somalia Is No Hideout for bin Laden

By NURUDDIN FARAH

There are many barriers to Osama bin Laden finding a safe haven in Somalia.

MORE OP-ED  NEWS

Contribute to The Neediest Cases
Fund

Make an online donation this Holiday Season to The New York Times
Neediest Cases Fund to help thousands of people.
 Donate now

About This E-Mail

You received these headlines because you requested The New York Times
Direct e-mail service. To sign up for other newsletters, cancel delivery,
change delivery options or your e-mail address, see
http://www.nytimes.com/email.
Check or un-check the headlines you would like to receive or cancel and
remember to go to the bottom of the page and click on "Save
Selections."  Suggestions and feedback are welcome at
feedback@nytimes.com.

Please include the following ID number when writing to
feedback@nytimes.com
so that we can track any reports of problems: 577749

How to Advertise

For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or
other creative advertising opportunities with The New York
Times on the Web, please contact Alyson Racer at
alyson@nytimes.com
 or visit our online media kit at
http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company


I have a meeting tomorrow.  Can you tell me what total power demand in in the East and the West and what Enron's volumes are.


This list looks much better than the other one.  Please make sure that we are
clear with the FERC people that this is a list of AA projects related to CWIP
and not a list of everything under the sun that AA does for us.  I want to
avoid any appearance that we misled the FERC people.  Thanks. DF

Lee Huber
09/19/2000 04:39 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: FERC request

Here is the pared down project report from AA that we will send to FERC.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron on 09/19/2000 04:38
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Gary Zahn                           09/19/2000 04:29 PM

To: Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: FERC request

Here's the list, which is limited to CWIP, that we would send to the FERC
auditors.  I'll await Drew's OK before sending. Thanks, Gary.
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary Zahn/ET&S/Enron on 09/19/2000 04:25
PM ---------------------------

Heather Mueck
09/19/2000 12:54 PM
To: Gary Zahn/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: FERC request

Gary -

Revised to include SAP projects related to property.  Let me know if you have
any changes.

Heather


Attached is the latest version...

===================================
Lucy Marshall
Executive Assistant to Jim Fallon
Office of the Chairman
Enron Broadband Services
Office 713-853-4525
Fax    713-345-7864
Cell    713-417-7802
lucy.marshall@enron.com


The Kellogg ISDA Agreement has been signed, but it is somewhat long.  Would
you like me to fax it to you (if so, what is your fax no.?) or would you like
me to fedex it to you?


reservation made on 7/25 - changed time on 7/26 - changed time 8/6 to 12:45


We have a 5,000 day purchase from Bay State that we can take at CNG/Trco
Leidy or at CNG South pool meter 10002.  The deal number is 418282.  Could we
put this deal number on the CNG and/or Trco sheet?
We currently have this deal baseloaded to CNG South Pool.  We need to call
Bay State if we move it.

My contact at Bay State is Stacey Djukic 219-853-4320.  I gave Stacey Angie's
number as a contact.  If we can't get in touch with Stacey, then talk to
Robin.


Just in case this is news to you, I've spoken with Ben Gwaltney (A/P) in
Houston about processing rebates.  He explained that when applying for the
rebate, have the rebate check payable to Enron.  Send the rebate check in on
a Deposit Transmittal Form, and code it with the same codes you had used to
process the initial expense (company #, expense code and cost center to which
the rebate should be credited).  If a Deposit Transmittal Form is unavailable
to you, you can just staple the check to a piece of paper showing the
appropriate codes.  Mail this deposit form with the rebate check via
inter-company mail to:  Treasury, Sam Round EB2703.

If I've left someone off of this message who would find this information
helpful, please pass it on.

Have a good weekend!
Anna


I have a fundies mtg. with Skilling at 3:00 and I should be done by 4:00.   Let's plan on 4:00 for NRG in my office and positions meeting after at whatever location works for you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Monday, July 30, 2001 10:38 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:	Edison, Andrew; Wagner, Joseph; Misra, Narsimha; Jackson, Mark
Subject:	RE: PJM E and NYJ

Andy -

Are you available to meet at 4:00 on NRG on 31?

Narsimha, Joe and Mark - Are you available to meet at 4:30 on positions (31st floor)?

Kevin  - does this work for you?  Also, should Louise be involved in the NRG discussion?

RH
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Monday, July 30, 2001 10:25 AM
To:	Herndon, Rogers
Subject:	RE: PJM E and NYJ

Yes I would like to attend meeting regarding NRG deal and let's have a position meeting this afternoon at 4:00.   Does that work?   I will keep my ears open for Zone J and G markets.   PJM East markets are rarely shown except for summer spreads which are now $18-25/Mwh (approx.) for 02 and 03.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Monday, July 30, 2001 8:26 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:	Misra, Narsimha; Edison, Andrew
Subject:	PJM E and NYJ

Kevin -

Please listen for good NQ-02 quotes in these 2 markets.  We are flying blind in these areas and I am most uncomfortable here.

Overall, we will be a little exposed to a gas rally (e.g. hurricane fears) due to our ercot position.  we are monitoring closely.  I do not think we are prepared to start buying gas yet as we need to work on our side to determine our position on an MMbtu equivalent basis.

Also,  will probably want to sit down with you and legal re: NRG early this week.  Spoke with their VP of trading and he really thinks this is a clear cut case for them and expressed no desire to negotiate.  In fact, I think they will try to elevate to higher levels as they essentially are saying we are renegging.  As I said before, they are planning a visit with Duran over the next week or so.  Let me know if you would like to visit with me and Andy Edison (inside legal) and have Louise join us too.

Thanks,
Rogers


Hertzberg (speaker of the CA Assembly) called a meeting yesterday afternoon of the group of market participants that have been negotiating the "core/noncore" proposal in California.  The purpose of the meeting was to brief us on their activities and their gameplan for trying to find a solution for California.  Here's a summary of the meeting.  Please keep confidential.

Work will be done over the weekend to put the core/noncore proposal in legislative language.  (We will be in the room.)
Work done by the "Plan B" group in the Assembly (Joe Dutra and Joe Nation) will also be put into legislative language over the weekend.
Because no proposal is "comprehensive," a complete legislative package will be created from the various pieces that have been worked on thus far (i.e., core/noncore, "Plan B," Edison MOU)
In addition, there are Republican demands that Hertzberg will need to address (e.g., end the litigation) in order to achieve bi-partison support, which is what Hertzberg's shooting for.
To move the legislation, the plan is to establish a "conference committee," comprised of an equal number of Democrats and Republicans.
The committe would begin work on Monday and would attempt to finish putting a comprehensive bill together, vote it out of the Legislature and send it to the Governor for signing by Monday, July 16th.
July 16th is the deadline because that is the date that the PUC will issue its proposed decision regarding, among other things, how DWR's revenue requirement will be put into rates, whether Direct Access needs to be suspended, etc.
The PUC is issuing the draft on the 16th in order to give everyone 30 days to review and comment before the Commission votes on a final order on August 15th.  (The PUC will actually issue a "thought piece" on Monday the 9th and will use reactions to the "thought piece" to craft the develop the proposed decision it plans to issue on the 16th.)
All of this is still up in the air, however.  As of right now, the leader of the Senate (Burton) has not agreed to Hertzberg's gameplan and the Republicans, while interested, have not yet committed to join the process.


NERC Roster

The NERC Board, at its meeting today in Vancouver, took bold steps to
expand its role for developing standards for the wholesale electric
industry in North America, to ensure the independence of actions by its
21 Security Coordinators from any wholesale or retail merchant
functions, and agreed to revamp the composition and voting structure of
its standing committees.

Attached are the relevant resolutions and policy statements approved by
the Board.

A press release concerning these actions is available on the NERC web
site.

Dave Nevius

  <<Board Resolutions on Items 20, 21, 22.doc>>  <<FINAL SCRTF Initial
Sectors and Criteria 092701.doc>>  <<FINAL SCRTF Report to SHC and BOT
092701 .doc>>
 - Board Resolutions on Items 20, 21, 22.doc
 - FINAL SCRTF Initial Sectors and Criteria 092701.doc
 - FINAL SCRTF Report to SHC and BOT 092701 .doc


Did you revise this?  I can't find it - let's assume PAs and ETAs go out on 12th.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forster, David
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 4:57 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Restart Plans

Louise,

I know this isn't "due" until the 7th, but we have been using a detailed activity list for a couple of weeks now, so here you go:

The high level subject area summary is as follows:

Activity	Date	EnronOnline person Responsible
Prepare Top customer list for marketing	Complete	Teresa Mandola
Prepare new website designs	4-Jan-02	Heather Alon
Deletion of nonapplicable content (e.g. Market Info pages)	7-Jan-02	Kal Shah
Prepare new broker client contracts	8-Jan-02	Daniel Diamond
New ETA, PA, GTC from legal	8-Jan-02	Carl Carter
Prepare marketing material designs to support new PA process	8-Jan-02	Kal Shah
Preparation of cleaned data and products	9-Jan-02	Jennifer Denny
Update of Registration Wizard	14-Jan-02	Kal Shah
Approval of ETA, PA, GTC from new buyer	14-Jan-02	Dave Forster/Bob Shults
Approval of website design from new buyer	14-Jan-02	Dave Forster/Kal Shah
Obtain Approval for new Press Release	14-Jan-02	Dave Forster/Kal Shah
Send out new PA's. Begin Registration Process	15-Jan-02	Teresa Mandola
Send out NetCoOnline Press Release	15-Jan-02	Kal Shah
Update of all online content for new company name	16-Jan-02	Rahil Jafry
Test bridging from NetCoOnline to new back office systems	17-Jan-02	Torrey Moorer
Approval of credit headroom calculation process from new buyer	17-Jan-02	Dave Forster/Bob Shults
Official Launch of NetCoOnline	21-Jan-02	Dave Forster

The more detailed activity list (if you want the detail) is as follows. Note that were there is no name, the name beside the subject category header prevails:

 << File: Relaunch activity.xls >>

Dave


Joel,

Congratulations and best luck.

Vince

"Joel Hanley" <jhanley@riskwaters.com> on 11/02/2000 10:27:16 AM
Please respond to <jhanley@riskwaters.com>
To: <jhanley@riskwaters.com>
cc:
Subject: Change of Role

Just a quick note to say that I have now left the EPRM/Risk conference
division after two and a half very happy years. I am however still at Risk
Waters Group, where I am now working as a journalist on EPRM magazine.
Future conference enquiries should go to Paul Bristow (US - 212 925 6990) or
Frances Tully (Europe - +44 (0) 20 7484 9731).

Many thanks for your work my events and I hope we can work together again in
the future. If you have any ideas on the writing side then I would always
appreciate a call or email - my contact details all remain the same.

Best regards,

Joel.

Joel Hanley
EPRM Magazine

Direct: +44 (0) 20 7484 9885
www.riskwaters.com


IntercontinentalExchange
Firm Power Price Bulletin

For Power Delivered on Monday, December 24, 2001
(Trade Date of Friday, December 21, 2001)

Click here to access index history <http://www.intcx.com/SubscriberServlet/subscriberservlet.class?operation=powerIndexForm&hub=All>.

* volume represents sell-side only *
Hub
High
Low
Wtd Avg Index
Change ($)
Vol (Mwh)
Cinergy
$17.50
$16.10
$16.98
- 4.16
40,800
Comed
$17.25
$15.75
$16.46
- 3.79
10,400
Entergy
$20.75
$18.00
$19.95
- 2.49
19,200
Nepool
$26.50
$25.75
$26.17
- 1.69
2,400
*Palo Verde
$23.70
$22.50
$23.01
- .41
6,400
PJM-West
$21.50
$20.90
$21.08
- 3.31
36,000
*SP-15
$25.00
$24.50
$24.75
+ .26
800
TVA
$16.00
$16.00
$16.00
- 5.69
2,400
**For power delivered on Wednesday, December 26th**

For Power Delivered on Wednesday, December 26, 2001
(Trade Date of Friday, December 21, 2001)
* volume represents sell-side only *
Hub
High
Low
Wtd Avg Index
Change ($)
Vol (Mwh)
Cinergy
$23.00
$22.30
$22.86
+5.88
21,600
Comed
$22.00
$21.50
$21.83
+5.37
2,400
Entergy
$24.00
$23.50
$23.81
+3.86
3,200
Nepool
$32.00
$32.00
$32.00
+5.83
800
PJM-West
$25.25
$22.25
$24.49
+3.41
12,800
TVA
$22.75
$22.00
$22.35
+6.35
4,800

Includes all trades done from 6 AM to 11 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for financially firm power delivered during the on-peak hours (6 AM - 10 PM CPT for Eastern hubs / 6 AM - 10 PM Pacific Prevailing Time for Western hubs) on the delivery date(s) specified.

IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.

In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.   Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.

This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.

You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.

To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com <mailto:sales@intcx.com>.

To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe <http://www.intcx.com/subscribe.html>.

?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


Yes, thanks.

	Tana Jones
	10/25/2000 12:53 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: (00-362) Revised Crude Oil Options Expiration Date

I sent it to the crude oil option trader.  Is that good enough?

	Mark Taylor
	10/25/2000 11:42 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: (00-362) Revised Crude Oil Options Expiration Date

This one should go to the crude traders.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 11:41 AM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	10/25/2000 11:50 AM

		 To: mark.taylor@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (00-362) Revised Crude Oil Options Expiration Date

Notice No. 00-362
October 25, 2000

To:
All NYMEX Division Members
All NYMEX Division Member Firms
All NYMEX Division Clearing Members
All NYMEX Division Operations Managers

From: George Henderson, Vice President

Re: Revised Crude Oil Options Expiration Date

It has come to the attention of the Exchange that some earlier publications
may contain an incorrect option expiration date. Please be advised that the
expiration date for the Crude Oil Options December 2000 contract month (LO
Z00) has been revised to Tuesday, November 14, 2000.

Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Floor
Departments Systems Area at (212) 299-2626.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=mark.taylor@enron.com&refdo
c=(00-362)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


: )  I couldn't resist.  Attached to this email is a Word document that lists
all the MOP members names, addresses and phone #'s.  I plan to revise it more
with email addresses and alternate/emergency phone #'s but for now will you
help me fill in the blanks where possible?  Later, if every one approves, we
can distribute this.  Let me know what you think.

Lots of Love for my sister in Christ.

Dana


When are you going public... I want to talk to Chris?


Please see attached revised travel advisory.  I think it does a better job of balancing the competing interests.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ewald, Laura
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:44 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.
Cc:	Brindle, John; Cromley, David
Subject:	updated travel policy

Steve -

Attached is suggested language for our updated travel policy.  Our plan is to send out the update via email and to post it on home.enron.com under "new and notable" as well as on the Corporate Security website under "bulletins."

Please let us know if you would like us to change anything or if this is what the management committee had in mind.  Thanks!

Laura

____________________________________________________
Laura E. Ewald
Enron Corp.
Tel. (713) 345-7648
Fax (713) 646-8838


The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days.  Please review.

Owner: George McClellan
Report Name: GMcCllelan92401
Days In Mgr. Queue: 26

Owner: Richard P Bergsieker
Report Name: Amex & COP September 2001
Days In Mgr. Queue: 10

Owner: John L Nowlan Jr
Report Name: October 17, 2001
Days In Mgr. Queue: 4


4-5

-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 7:12 AM
To: Lavorato, John
Subject: RE:

3-5

-----Original Message-----
From: Lavorato, John
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 2:30 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject:

DENVER -3
ARIZ +2.5
MINN +3.5
PHILI +9 UNDER 41.5 TEASE

ALL 150


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000 11:10 AM -----

	Mary Hain@ECT
	12/12/2000 10:55 AM

		 To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M
Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lester Rawson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe@ECT, Paul
Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark
Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT@ECT, Diana
Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave Parquet,
Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Christi Nicolay
		 Subject: More information about the SDG&E gas filing

San Diego Gas & Electric Company's filing for emergency relief asked FERC to
re-impose price caps for short-term releases of capacity for service to the
California border and to points of interconnection between interstate
pipelines and California LDCs, and provide that sellers be required to state
separately the transportation and commodity components of the bundled rate
for bundled sales at these points, etc.


Cara,
I pulled several comments you made out, and dittos from here.

I agree with your following statements:

	Even though this path could be consolidated to be smaller, we have many paths that are a good deal longer.  The part of the path in blue is in the 	upstream cell and seems to be the holdup. The size limit of the path needs to be considerably larger, or we need a way to override that for exceptionally 	long paths. I made the path smaller and got the same error.

I notice that when we have values in the transmission cells, the big E is not on there. Enron needs to be shown as "bookends" on the transmission we use, or else it could be misconstrued as a purchase or sale.

Some really long paths might show better in line view if that could auto-size vertically

When I try to cut a particlar path, the action of the entire Path Cut screen coming up and then me having to choose New Path cut totally blocks my view of the existing path I am trying to deal with. I think instead this should pop up as an addition to the expanded view of the existing deal. I should be able to cut a path without having to deal with the whole sort menu.

I absolutely agree with the following:
	Region should be a button list that is driven only by the East or West designation of the person's Enpower Login.  As a West User, I should only get 5 choices for 	Region: WSCC-N, WSCC-S, Rockies, MidC, or California. The drop down list is time consuming,  confusing and can lead to too many errors.

	Reason Text-this is not spelled correctly,  and the text box could be much smaller.  Most Reasons are probably a sentence at most.


FYI, Reuters crossed the attached article on Y2K and highlighted Enron's
worst case scenario information from our SEC filing .  We can probably expect
more articles like this during December.  Our reactive media statement on
Enron's 10K remains the same, but the media is likely to run our filing
language, as they are looking for "doomsday" quotes (I spoke to the Reuters
reporter and explained that we complied with the SEC requirements and the
worst case scenario was unlikely, yet the reporter still ran 10K quotes
rather than a corporate response to the filing.)

If you have any questions, please call me.

Thanks.
Karen, x39757
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 11/26/99 09:49
AM ---------------------------

Amita Gosalia@ECT
11/26/99 09:34 AM
To: Joan Wasylik/LON/ECT@ECT, Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, David J
Williams/LON/ECT@ECT, David Rae/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Y2K

FYI - may generate some interest from the media!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT on 26/11/99 15:33
---------------------------
From: Philippe Travis on 26/11/99 15:26
To: Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita
Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Y2K

Enclosed is an article which mentions Enron and the '99 to 2000 change.

Oil industry has fingers crossed over Y2K bug
By Richard Valdmanis
NEW YORK, Nov 24 (Reuters) - Despite some glowing reports on Y2K readiness in
the U.S. oil and gas industry, private analysts, and even some of the more
forthcoming oil companies, say there is no way to know whether the computer
glitch will result in fuel shortages to consumers.

"After all the research that's been done and all the data that's been
collected, we don't really know what will happen when the clock strikes 12 on
New Year's Eve," said Dr. Martin Weiss, Chairman of Weiss Ratings Inc., which
has been tracking Y2K compliance among major U.S. companies for more than a
year.

The Y2K bug refers to a software glitch in some older computers that only
recognize the final two digits in a year. The glitch could result in
malfunctions if the computers mistake 2000 for 1900.

For the energy industry, which depends on the electrical grid as well as
internal computer systems, the Y2K bug could lead to unsafe operations at
refineries and to shortages in fuel shipments - a daunting possibility for
the leading nation in energy consumption at the height of winter.

Despite trade group survey results that claim nearly 100 percent of the oil
and gas industry will be ready for Y2K - a far more encouraging percentage
than the roughly 50 percent reported a year ago - some companies say it would
be foolish to expect no surprises.

They point out that the Y2K situation is one for which there is no precedent
and the task of finding all non-compliant computer chips in the
interdependent petroleum and electricity industries is mammoth.

Enron Corp. (ENE.N), a major U.S. petroleum company and pipeline operator, is
among the companies unsure of what the New Year will bring.

Despite their best efforts to upgrade their "mission critical" systems --
those that are essential to their business -- the company says "there is no
assurance that (our Y2K) plan will succeed in accomplishing its purposes or
that unforseen circumstances will not arise during implementation of the plan
that would materially and adversely affect Enron."

Enron made the statement in a filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

The company also said that neither it nor utilities and outside entities on
which the company depends are likely to find and replace all non-compliant
computer chips which could lead to what the company calls a "cascading
effect" of system failures.

"The problem is not, and will not be, unique to Enron," the company added.

Though Enron has not announced any precautionary Y2K shutdowns, a number of
other major U.S. pipeline operators have. For example the Colonial Pipeline,
the largest in the nation, plans an eight-hour shutdown starting on New
Year's Eve.

Explorer Pipeline, the second largest, plans a 20-hour shutdown before the
rollover into the new year.

The pipelines together supply nearly three million gallons of gasoline and
other fuels per day between Houston, New York and Chicago.

In preparation for the potential pipeline disruptions, as well as an expected
buy up of fuel by nervous consumers, retail gasoline operators are planning
to stock up an extra seven days of gasoline supplies to their normal 30 day
inventories, according to industry and government officials.

The planned inventory build could also guard against any potential
disruptions at U.S. refineries, which produce the gasoline.

By most accounts, refiners have put in the greatest amount of effort to iron
out Y2K problems. According to Weiss Rating Co., the majority of large U.S.
oil refining companies, like Exxon Corp (XON.N) and Mobil Corp. (MOB.N), are
either average or above average in their adherance to Y2K plans mapped out
more than a year ago, and only a handful, like Chevron Corp (CHV.N) and
Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Corp (UDS.N), are rated below average.

"While pipelines appear the more laggard group in the energy industry,
refiners seem to be the more prepared," said Dr. Weiss. "Over all, the energy
sector appears to be taking the Y2K problem seriously - but that is no
guarantee that the New Year will be a non-event."

According to reports by the American Petroleum Institute (API), the Natural
Gas Association and other industry trade groups, nearly 100 percent of the
nation's refiners, retailers, and pipeline operators will be ready for the
year 2000 turnover, which comes in less than two months, by having Y2K proof
systems in place and contingency plans if they break down.

"What the reports are saying is, the trade groups are confident these
companies are going to be Y2K ready, and that's encouraging," said an
official at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). "But obviously
nobody can make any guarantees."

REUTERS Rtr 15:34 11-24-99


I got back from vacation late Friday.  Our whole group got bumped from the
flight in Paris so they paid us $700 each to take the next flight out.  Not a
bad deal!  But it was 27 hours travel time from start to finish and I was
exhausted.  Luckily, it was a 3 day weekend here, so I had time to recover
(and clean from my construction work).

I had a really nice time.  Most of our time we spent in East Germany, except
for the flight out of Munich.  We went to Berlin, Leipzig, Eisenach,
Wittenberg, Erfurt, Potsdam, and hiked in the Harz mountains.  My favorite
time was the time spent in Kitzbuhl, Austria.  It was wonderful, I hope to
make an annual hiking trip there for a week every year.  It is so hard to do
anything like it in Houston, I forget how nice the mountains can be.  Our
hotel was great, smack in the middle of town and it only cost $30, breakfast
and dinner included!  Such a deal!

I got home and my house is almost done.  There are only a few minor things
left.  The garden is at 85%.  My landscaper had a big fight with my tenant
while I was gone so she wouldn't come to my house until I got back.

I've picked out my two new kitties, and I'll pick them up this weekend, I
think (if the painter is done).  They are calico cats.  I haven't named them
yet.

What's going on with you?  Are they working you to death?  Any fun things
going on?