Hi Folks,

Here's how I see the Passing Game Matchups this week.

PLEASE NOTE:   See the cheatsheets online at www.footballguys.com  for
exactly where I rank players and to determine who to start.   I always
receive emails asking me how I can have a guy ranked highly on the
cheatsheet but listed under a matchup that favors the Defense.   Just
because one matchup may be more favorable than another, that doesn't
necessarily mean I'd start the player with the best matchup.   Peyton
Manning may have a horrible matchup one week but unless you're sitting on
Kurt Warner or Daunte Culpepper, Manning's your guy no matter who he's
lining up against.   The matchup info is meant to be just one more tool in
your box when it comes to deciding between players.

Note:  I've used the player stats sorted by performance over the last four
weeks extensively in developing these write-ups. Stats are provided by Mike
Hall's excellent FLM League Management Software.  http://www.fflm.com/ for
more info.   The points scored by position data is from our Footballguy
Clayton Gray.  The Target and Redzone Data is from our Footballguy Andy
Hicks.
Let's get to it.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Passing Game Matchups to Avoid and Exploit

Locks:  These games feature Defenses that should be overmatched against the
Offense.

Arizona Passing Game vs Detroit Defense

If you're going to roll the dice on Jake Plummer, this is the week against
the Lions who rank # 23 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four
weeks.   The Lions rank # 31 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 25 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.   WR David Boston is a bonafide All Pro and
is worthy of starting in any league, even with Plummer.

Denver Passing Game vs Washington Defense

QB Brian Griese gets healthy and now finds himself with no WRs to throw to.
Eddie Kennison suffered a brain cramp last week and retired / unretired /
was cut.   He didn't contribute much anyways but with Rod Smith hobbled with
an ankle injury, the Broncos are dangerously thin.   Smith says he'll play
though.   TE Desmond Clark and Dwayne Carswell could see more action.   The
Redskin defense is awful ranking # 31 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over
the last four weeks so you have to like the matchup.

Indianapolis Passing Game vs New Orleans Defense

Peyton Manning looks like he'll be ready to go, broken jaw and all.
They'll need him as Edgerrin James looks to be done for the year.   I'd
expect you'll see Manning lean heavily on Marvin Harrison to carry the load.
Jerome Pathon re-aggravated his foot and may not even play this week.
Reggie Wayne and Terrence Wilkins will be the other WRs.   New Orleans ranks
# 29 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks so they're
very beatable.   For the year, they rank # 20 in Fantasy Points Allowed to
QBs and # 23 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

New Orleans Passing Game vs Indianapolis Defense

QB Aaron Brooks finally played like we all were expecting last week.   With
347 yards and 2 TDs (plus another sure TD dropped by Ricky Williams), let's
hope this is what Brooks needed to get going.   WRs Joe Horn and Willie
Jackson looked great and should continue to roll.   Indianapolis ranks # 28
in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks so they shouldn't
present too much of a problem.

New York Giants Passing Game vs Minnesota Defense

QB Kerry Collins will likely be thinking of last year's NFC Championship
game where he toasted the Vikings.   It could happen again as the Giants are
rolling while Minnesota is struggling.   WRs Amani Toomer, Ike Hilliard and
Joe Jurevicius will see action.   The Giants are a run first team but that
opens the pass as teams focus on stopping Ron Dayne and Tiki Barber.   The
Vikings rank # 21 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four
weeks.

San Francisco Passing Game vs Carolina Defense

QB Jeff Garcia and WR Terrell Owens are no brainer starts against the AFC
Pro Bowl Team so I think they'll probably warrant starts against the Panther
defense that ranks # 26 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four
weeks.   WR Tai Streets is worth a gamble as is our favorite Yale grad, TE
Eric Johnson.   Greg Clark hasn't been healthy in years it seems.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Prime Matchups:  These games feature Defenses that should have trouble
stopping the Offense.

Baltimore Passing Game vs Cleveland Defense

Elvis Grbac looks to be taking a step backwards as he looked uncomfortable
in the pocket last week.   Look for the Ravens to run the ball to take
pressure off the passing game.   This is a good matchup for Baltimore as the
Browns rank # 25 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.
Qadry Ismail was the big WR last week with 129 yards and a TD.   Brandon
Stokely is in the WR mix as well as the up and down Travis Taylor.   TE
Shannon Sharpe is always a threat.

Cincinnati Passing Game vs Tennessee Defense

The strength of this team is Corey Dillon and running the ball.   Kitna
threw 48 passes last week and that won't continue.   With T.J.
Houshmandzadeh becoming a factor, the Bengals are getting back to the 3 WR
sets that were effective before Chad Johnson was injured.   That's a big
plus.   The Titans rank # 30 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last
four weeks so they're definitely vulnerable.   For the year, Tennessee ranks
# 27 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 30 in Fantasy Points Allowed to
WRs.

Detroit Passing Game vs Arizona Defense

Charlie Batch is throwing the ball a lot and that's just fine for his
owners.   The problem is he doesn't have many guys who can catch it.
Lamont Warren and Corey Schlesinger caught more passes than WR Johnnie
Morton last week.   That needs to change.   The Cardinals rank # 11 in
Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks but they're not that
good.   For the year, they rank # 23 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and #
21 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Green Bay Passing Game vs Atlanta Defense

Favre's playing as well as ever.   Start him.  I'd start both Antonio
Freeman and Billy Schroeder as well.   Having Schroeder back clearly is a
big plus for Favre.   TE Bubba Franks is always worth a shot as well.   The
Falcons rank # 10 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks
so they're no pushover.   Although that's an improvement from where the
Falcons have been.   For the year, they still rank # 30 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to QBs and # 31 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.   I'd feel good
about all the Packers here.

Oakland Passing Game vs San Diego Defense

Rich Gannon put together another solid game throwing for 257 yards and 2
TDs.   With guys like Tim Brown and Jerry Rice to throw to, that doesn't
hurt your chances.   He'll be facing a Charger Defense that's struggled a
bit and now ranks # 20 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four
weeks.   Safety Rodney Harrison will likely miss this week and that hurts.

Pittsburgh Passing Game vs Jacksonville Defense

This team is about Jerome Bettis and running the football but part of
Bettis' success has to be attributed to the revival of the passing game.
Stewart offers enough of a threat that defenses must honor the pass.   Hines
Ward is productive but he's about the only player from the passing game I
can see starting in your league.   It is enticing this week though as the
Jaguars rank just # 24 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four
weeks.

St. Louis Passing Game vs New England Defense

QB Kurt Warner's thumb responded well to treatment this week and looks good
to go.   That's bad news for Patriot fans.   The New England Defense ranks #
19 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   Isaac Bruce
and Torry Holt are must starts every week even against a giant killer team
like New England.   Marshall Faulk is back in full swing and he'll be a
major part of the passing game again.

Tampa Bay Passing Game vs Chicago Defense

QB Brad Johnson is starting to feel the comfort zone it seems although he's
still dinking and dunking the ball (5.22 yards per attempt last week)   It's
basically Johnson (Brad) throwing to Johnson (Keyshawn)   The Bears are not
nearly as tough defending the pass as they are the run.   They rank # 27 in
Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   Could be a good
matchup.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Even Matchups:  These games feature no real advantage either way

Buffalo Passing Game vs Seattle Defense

Alex Van Pelt takes over and that could be a spark the Bills need.   WRs
Peerless Price and Eric Moulds should be more involved.   Or on the other
hand, maybe we'll find Rob Johnson wasn't as bad as his OL made him look.
We'll see.   Van Pelt probably isn't a starting QB anywhere (his last start
was in 1997) but he might be worth a shot if you're desperate.   Seattle is
an average defense ranked # 12 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the
last four weeks.   But for the year, they rank # 29 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to QBs and # 24 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Cleveland Passing Game vs Baltimore Defense

QB Tim Couch spread the offense out to beat Baltimore earlier this year and
I'd look for them to employ a similar tactic this week.   He's steady.   WR
Kevin Johnson is clearly still his primary target.   The Ravens are tough on
the run defense but rank # 22 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the
last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 12 in Fantasy Points Allowed to
QBs and # 10 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.   Tough matchup but don't
count out Couch.

Dallas Passing Game vs Philadelphia Defense

Leaf started his Dallas career with an unremarkable 14 of 22 for 114 yard
day.   1 TD and 1 Int.   I guess it could have been worse.   He'll have
another week of practice under the belt.   The Eagles are pretty average
lately on defense ranking # 13 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the
last four weeks.   For the year, they're tough though ranking # 3 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to QBs and # 4 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.   This
doesn't look promising for Leaf or WRs Joey Galloway / Raghib Ismail
although both are big play guys and it only takes a few seconds for them to
make your weekend.   They will have a speed advantage over the more physical
Eagle Corners.

New York Jets Passing Game vs Miami Defense

Vinnie Testeverde looks to have his exciting rookie WR, Santana Moss
available for his debut game this week.   Could be interesting as Dolphin
Cornerback Sam Madison is injured and Moss could make things interesting if
the Jets turn him loose.   Wayne Chrebet may be limited with a bad shoulder.
Laveranues Coles has been up and down.   The Dolphins rank # 14 in Passing
Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks but clearly, will miss
Madison.

Philadelphia Passing Game vs Dallas Defense

Donovan McNabb continues his outstanding play.   WR James Thrash has clearly
identified himself as the prime WR over Todd Pinkston.   Young Freddie
Mitchell is coming on strong too.   The Cowboys are pretty tough on defense
ranking # 7 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.
Although for the year, they rank # 19 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and #
19 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.   This team may decide to keep it on
the ground though given the huge success they had running the ball last week
with Duce Staley and Correll Buckhalter.

Tennessee Passing Game vs Cincinnati Defense

Steve McNair sat out of Thursday's practice nursing his bad hand.   His
status for Sunday isn't clear yet.   Although he's normally a question mark
each week.   His # 1 target, TE Frank Wycheck is hobbling too with an ankle
but hopes to be ready by Sunday.   WRs Kevin Dyson and Derrick Mason are
playing well lately.   The Bengals are average ranking # 15 in Passing Yards
Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 24 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 22 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.   K
eep an eye on McNair's hand here.

Washington Passing Game vs Denver Defense

I'll admit to being surprised at the success Tony Banks has had but you have
to give the guy his due.   He's stretching the defenses and making good
reads.   And WRs Michael Westbrook and Rod Gardner seem to play hard for
him.   They'll face a Denver Defense ranked # 16 in Passing Yards Allowed
Per Game over the last four weeks.   Denver held Doug Flutie in check last
week so that's some worry.   TE Stephen is still looking very iffy for
Sunday.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Downside Matchups:  These games feature a Defense that could pose trouble
for the Offense.

Atlanta Passing Game vs Green Bay Defense

QB Chris Chandler was able to practice Thursday and that's great news.   The
Falcons struggled without him.   WR Shawn Jefferson led all receivers last
week - with 2 catches.   Ouch.   Hopefully, with Chandler back, Jefferson,
Terence Mathis and Tony Martin will do better.   On the flip side, Chandler
is his usual one shot away from the bench.   It won't be easy though against
a tough Packer defense that ranks # 8 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over
the last four weeks.

Carolina Passing Game vs San Francisco Defense

Ugliness all around here.   George Seifert has to look across at those 49er
uniforms and wonder how it came to this.   QB Chris Weinke is reportedly
looking pretty good in practice but coach Seifert was reluctant to name him
the starter.   If he can't go, Matt Lytle will start.   WR Muhsin Muhammad
and TE Wesley Walls are maybe worth the gamble but their stock is certainly
slipping with the QB play.   San Francisco is ranked # 18 in Passing Yards
Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.

Chicago Passing Game vs Tampa Bay Defense

Look for QB Jim Miller to keep it pretty conservative in the passing scheme.
Tampa ranks # 5 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.
The Bears want to run Anthony Thomas and throw enough to keep the Bucs off
balance.   When they do throw, look for multiple WR sets as they work rookie
David Terrell into the mix with Marty Booker and Dez White.

Minnesota Passing Game vs New York Giants Defense

With the Vikings running game in disarray, look for them to air it out
against a tough New York Defense.   QB Daunte Culpepper will have his work
cut out for him against the Giant defense ranked # 6 in Passing Yards
Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   Like Kerry Collins, you can bet
he'll be thinking of the NFC Championship game from a year ago where his
team fell apart.   Randy Moss and Cris Carter are starters in most leagues
just on potential alone.   TE Byron Chamberlain could be a factor as well.

New England Passing Game vs St. Louis Defense

QB Drew Bledsoe proclaimed himself ready to start but Tom Brady gets the nod
again this week.   No promises for next week but it'll be hard to keep
Bledsoe's salary on the bench.   We'll see.   Brady's been solid.   WRs Troy
Brown and David Patten need to re-engage and become a bigger part of the
offense.   The Rams are tough ranking # 4 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game
over the last four weeks.

San Diego Passing Game vs Oakland Defense

Is the "Flutie Magic" wearing off?   He certainly looked mortal last week.
This week, he'll be without TE Freddie Jones.   Even though Jones wasn't
being utilized much, he was still a nice outlet.   Tim Dwight is still out
with a collapsed lung so that leaves WRs Curtis Conway and Jeff Graham to
carry the load.   Both are capable.   Oakland's Charles Woodson may be
limited with a bad foot and that'll help.   The Raiders rank # # 9 in
Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   They rank # 21in
Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 12 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Seattle Passing Game vs Buffalo Defense

Matt Hasselbeck offered a glimmer of hope last week and hopes to build on
that success.   As long as Shaun Alexander is running wild, Hasselbeck
certainly has a chance with the play action pass.   Darrell Jackson in
particular is looking better and Koren Robinson will work against a tough
set of Cornerbacks.   The Bills rank # 2 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game
over the last four weeks and have 16 sacks over the last 4 games so this
will be no cakewalk.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Defensive Slam Dunks:  These games feature a very tough Defense posing major
problems for the Offense.

Jacksonville Passing Game vs Pittsburgh Defense

Mark Brunell and crew will have their work cut out for them as they face a
much better Steeler team than they saw in week 1.   The Steelers rank # 3 in
Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.  WRs Jimmy Smith
and Keenan McCardell both scored last week and continue to put up quality
numbers.   The Steelers will throw Cornerbacks Dewayne Washington and Chad
Scott who are very solid.   Plus, the defense has recorded 23 sacks over the
last 4 weeks.   Tough matchup.

Miami Passing Game vs New York Jets Defense

QB Jay Fiedler quietly put a very nice game together last week with 259
yards and 2 TDs.   His WRs are solid and our guy Chris Chambers had a
breakout game with 2 TDs.   Oronde Gadsden is quietly putting together a
nice season.   The Jets rank # 1 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the
last four weeks though so it'll likely be tough.   They rank # 4 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to QBs for the year and # 8 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.
I'd look for the Dolphins to try and exploit their much softer run defense.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Bryant Analytics, Inc.   All Rights Reserved 1999-2001

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


<http://images.commissioner.com/images/spln_fantasy_hdr_600.gif>Fantasy Football Newsletter
December 7, 2001

      <http://cbs.sportsline.com/images/newsletter/magnify.jpg>Fantasy Sports <http://fantasy.sportsline.com>     <http://cbs.sportsline.com/images/newsletter/magnify.jpg>Fantasy Football <http://football0.commissioner.com/mp/pro-home?league=zero>     <http://cbs.sportsline.com/images/newsletter/magnify.jpg>CBS SportsLine.com <http://cbs.sportsline.com>

Welcome to another edition of the 2001 Fantasy Football Newsletter!

The Fantasy Football newsletter will arrive in your e-mail inbox every Friday. We'll include news about the web site; tips on using all the features available; and answers to your player-related questions from the "Gridiron Guru."

  <http://cbs.sportsline.com/images/newsletter/pixel.jpg>	Inside

* More Playoff Information

* Don't Forget the Gameday Tip Sheet

* Gridiron Guru

* Tip of the Week

 <http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/217/sffpn1130e.cgi>	  <http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/12/sffpn1130w.cgi>	  <http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/224/sffpn1130s.cgi>
  _____

More Playoff Information

Go to Schedule, Playoffs to see when your playoff tournament starts and how many rounds it lasts. If you are still in contention, go to NFL Teams, Schedule and take note of the NFL teams with byes during your playoff weeks, so you know which players might not be available for you in the big games.

  _____

Don't Forget the Gameday Tip Sheet

Sometimes it pays to wait until the absolute last minute before submitting your lineup. Stop by your team's site on Sunday mornings for last-minute player news and injury updates. Click News, Fantasy News on the toolbar at around 10:00am ET for our Gameday Tip Sheet.

  _____

Gridiron Guru

Welcome to Gridiron Guru, where we'll answer your questions about players and offer Fantasy Football roster advice. We invite you to send your own scouting reports and comments on players to: gridguru@commissioner.com <mailto:gridguru@commissioner.com>. You'll get the chance to be heard by thousands of Fantasy players just like yourself!

Question - Tavis Butler, Richmond, VA

I have Keyshawn Johnson, Kevin Johnson, Jerry Rice and Jimmy Smith. Which three of these WRs should I start in Week 13?

Answer - GG

Keyshawn leads the league in receptions (83), but still has no touchdowns. He's a risky start in TD-based leagues, but he's facing a subpar Detroit secondary and has a great chance to score his first TD this week. Kevin Johnson has been solid, and Smith is too good to bench. The odd man out here is Rice, who has played very well but is not as consistent.

Question - Lou Spadone, New York City

Which two of these RBs should I start: Antowain Smith, Dominic Rhodes, Charlie Garner, Larry Centers? Also, will Rod Smith play well against Seattle? If he doesn't play, would you start J.J. Stokes or Joey Galloway?

Answer - GG

Centers is definitely not an option. Smith has become a solid Fantasy player this season, so we'd start him. Garner has a good matchup vs. Kansas City, but we'd side with Rhodes over him. Rhodes will get every opportunity to produce, while Garner loses red zone carries to Zack Crockett. As for your second question, Smith is still hampered by ankle injuries, which makes him a risk. If he's not able to play, we'd go with Stokes, who has put up decent numbers in recent weeks.

Question - Eric Mitchell, Durham, NC

Who would you start this week: Corey Dillon or Duce Staley?

Answer - GG

Dillon hasn't rushed for over 100 yards since week seven, in large part because Cincinnati's passing game is sputtering. Staley and the Eagles offense looked sharp in Philly's win over Kansas City last week. They are using Staley effectively on offense, so start him over Dillon.

  _____

Tip of the Week

Marc Sturgis, Plano, TX: Many football experts think that Emmitt Smith is all washed up, but he proved on Sunday that as long as he gets carries, he'll be productive. If he continues to get 25 carries per game, Emmitt will be a useful Fantasy player the rest of the season.

This message has been provided free of charge and free of obligation. If you prefer not to receive emails of this nature please send an email to remove@commissioner.com <mailto:remove@commissioner.com>. Do not respond to this email directly.


Start Date: 4/14/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041422.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 22 / Preferred:  10.89 / Final:   7.89)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


This is none of my business, but the turbines are owned by ENext.  Hows does
the LLC give the assignment?  Should the turbine contract be in the name of
the LLC, because it isn't at this moment.  Maybe I messed up.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/26/2001 06:24
PM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ps.ge.com on 04/26/2001 04:09:13 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com, dale.rasmussen@enron.com
cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, bill.williams@enron.com

Subject: FW: Assignment and Assumption Agreement re: E-Next B/O Contract w /
GE for MCS as EPC for LVCII.

Kay/Bill,

Bill says he agrees and accepts our comments to the A&A.

One change required to the Rev 5 document.  In Exhibit B, Add item "27)One
additional Human Machine Interface (HMI) per Unit (desktop PC type)"

Include these changes and we can get this done tomorrow.

Thanks,

Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP); 'bill.williams@enron.com'
Cc: 'dale.rasmussen@enron.com'
Subject: RE: Assignment and Assumption Agreement re: E-Next B/O Contract
w/ GE for MCS as EPC for LVCII.

Here are my comments.

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:15 AM
To: Shoemaker, Kent
Subject: FW: Assignment and Assumption Agreement re: E-Next B/O Contract
w/ GE for MCS as EPC for LVCII.
Importance: High

Kent,

Please review and note that this needs to be completed by week's end.
Closing date is 5/1 and I'm out rest of week 5/2-6.  We may need some of
Kay's help if we don't like what we see.  But let's try to work it out with
Dale Rasmussen first (Enron Portland office).

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill.Williams@enron.com [mailto:Bill.Williams@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:58 PM
To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)
Cc: THOMAS CONSTANTINE; Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com;
Jody.Blackburn@enron.com
Subject: Assignment and Assumption Agreement re: E-Next B/O Contract w/
GE for MCS as EPC for LVCII.

Hello Lee.  (I know your thinking - What now!)

As I'm sure you know, we are fast approaching a full notice to proceed on
the LVCII project.  One item that we have as part of our EPC contract with
Modern Continental South, is an Assignment and Assumption Agreement whereby
MCS will assume certain responsibilities for (owner), and abide by the
conditions set forth in that agreement.  We will ask GE to participate in
that Agreement.  I have attached that agreement to this e mail for your
review.  Current plans are for a full NTP (Notice To Proceed) to begin
construction on May 1, and we are working hard to be ready for that key
milestone to occur. Your review and concurrence on the draft document
attached below is appreciated.

Please review and contact me should you have any questions.

Sincerely

W. J.  (Bill) Williams Jr
Director, Technical Services
Enron North America
(503) 464-8958

(See attached file: GE ASSIGNMENT 173951 CLEAN 0417.doc)

 - GE ASSIGNMENT 173951 CLEAN 04171.doc


This looks like the macro problem we talked about.  Let me know what I need to do to fix.

Thanks,

Errol, X5-8274

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McPearson, Shannon
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:38 PM
To:	McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Subject:	PG Book

Errol,

Is a Macro problem your final answer on this??

I need an answer on this. If the beginning balances were changed in error, please let me know this so I can determine what I need to do to fix this variance. Again, this change did not affect your P&L.

In the January 2001 PG book DPR, for the EOL Gas Daily Roll, you reduced your beginning Gross Balance for January by $9,066,220 and you increased your beginning Liquidated Balance for January by $9,066,220. So, the EOL Gas Daily Roll stayed flat in total and did not cause a problem P&L wise. However, this amount is falling out on my reconciliation for January. Could you please tell me what deal or deals were liquidated for $9,066,220, which in turn caused a reduction in your MTM?? We are concerned that these may be third party deals that Financial Settlements are not aware of.

Thanks!!

Shannon McPearson
Enron North America
713-853-5944
Shannon.McPearson@enron.com


Thanksgiving is set at Mom's for Thursday, November 23, 2000 at noon.  Hope
to see each of you there.   Try to cheer Mom up.  She seems to be a little
depressed.  Maybe its the fact that her job has been cut back and she feels
that she has no outside activities to occupy her mind.


Can everyone meet at 3:30 today?  Please let me know.

Daren


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,

Attached you will find an excel document. The outage contained within is
a forced outage. Your daily delivery will still contain this outage. Any
questions please let me know. Thanks.

Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED
ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR
COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF
YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.

 - OUTAGE.dbf
 - 012502.xls


-----Original Message-----
From: 	webmaster@cera.com@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 4:06 PM
To:	clients@cera.com
Subject:	US West Hydro on the Rise, Demand Low - CERA Monthly Briefing

Title: A Moving Supply and Demand Picture
URL(s):

http://www.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2958;

***********************************************************************

US WEST HYDRO ON THE RISE, DEMAND LOW

Shifting 2002 electricity demand drivers and improvement of hydroelectric
conditions in the US West continue to change the outlook for 2002 and beyond.
Although 2002 demand will still contract from 2001 levels, CERA's updated
outlook calls for modestly stronger demand than previously forecasted. The weak
January fundamentals that have dragged down Henry Hub and western regional gas
prices should continue through February.

*  The level of voluntary and price-responsive electricity conservation in
California appears to be falling as the supply crisis abates.

*  Gas prices have been kept at bay by the lack of evidence of the expected
decline in US supply and weak national economic trends that point to further
delay in the rebound of industrial and power generation demand.

*  The abundant western snowpacks that will be shown to the world during the
winter Olympics are having an impact on regional energy markets.

**end**

Follow above URL for complete Monthly Briefing (10 printed pages).

E-mail Category: Monthly Briefing
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Western Energy

*****************************************************************************************
CERAWeek2002 - February 11-15, 2002 - 21st Annual Executive Conference and
Related Events REGISTER ONLINE TODAY AT:  http://www.cera.com/ceraweek
** Two- and Four-day Passes Available
** Special Enrollment Programs
** Partnership Opportunities
** CERAWeek Online Premium Access
*****************************************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


please remind Dick and me of this meeting.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000 04:30 PM
---------------------------

John Hodge@ENRON
07/05/2000 03:50 PM
To: Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: MarketLink Capacity

I have reserved conference room EB2990 at 3:00 P.M. on Thursday, July 6 for
our discussion of Enron's participation in Transco's MarketLink project.
Please let me know if you will not be able to attend.


RAO:
PLEASE ADD AN ACRONYM P&L AND PRICE SHEET FOR "THE CITY OF GARLAND."  THIS
SHOULD BE LISTED IN THE ERCOT SECTION OF THE PRICE SHEET.  THE ACRONYM SHOULD
BE AS FOLLOWS:  "DGG."  THANKS FOR ALL YOUR HELP ON RECENT ADDITIONS.


Attached is a proposed netting agreement from Vitol that would cover only methanol book transfers.  It looks ok to me but I wanted to run it by you to see if you have any comments.
Thanks,

Mike
EB3847
(713) 853-6667 DID
(713) 646-4842 FAX


Vasant,

When can we call this guy?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2001
08:07 AM ---------------------------
From: Dorothy Dalton@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 05/03/2001 07:45 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: message from Ken Rice

Vince:

Thanks for returning this call.  I guess it helps if I provide the contact
information!

Tom Limperis
517-423-5617

Thanks!

Dorothy Dalton
Office of the Chairman
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith Street, EB4505
Houston, TX  77002
713-853-6724 - direct
713-853-9469 - fax

	Vince J Kaminski@ECT
	05/02/01 09:42 AM

		 To: Dorothy Dalton/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Re: message from Ken Rice

Dorothy,

No problem. Please, CC-mail  me
Tom's number. One of the members of the group has a PhD in
computer science and he will join me for the call.

Vince

From: Dorothy Dalton@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 05/01/2001 08:53 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: message from Ken Rice

Vince:

Ken Rice received a call through a friend's referral from Dr. Tom Limperis (a
professor at the University of Michigan).  Dr. Limperis has developed a
statistical database management system he would like to show Enron.  Ken
would like you to return this call on his behalf.  He feels that you are
probably the only person who will understand and be able to determine if
Enron should have an interest.

Do you mind returning this call?  Please let me know.

Thanks!

Dorothy Dalton
Office of the Chairman
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith Street, EB4505
Houston, TX  77002
713-853-6724 - direct
713-853-9469 - fax


FYI - meter 1528 has been trying to come back up since Sat.  Sam in gas
control said it might be back up on Wed.  We currently have a nom of 500/day.

AL


---------------------- Forwarded by Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000
10:55 AM ---------------------------
From: Barbara G Dillard@ENRON on 11/21/2000 09:02 AM
To: Richard Tomaski/Corp/Enron@Enron, James Simpson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PGL & NS sendout for 11/22/00


David:
Here is the KM draft.  Should Mark, you and I meet to go over procedures as
well as what has ben done in the past?
Carol
---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2000
09:29 AM ---------------------------

Carol St Clair
04/14/2000 01:32 PM
To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Kinder Morgan

Attached is a draft of 2 minor amendments that KM requested.
Carol


Following please find the new Weekly Management report and the Daily
Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 10/13/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	2,512
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,567
Total Life to Date Transactions	357,560

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 	10/13/00
Enron North America	76%
Enron Europe Limited	31%
GLOBAL PRODUCTS	22%
Enron Metals	8%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	44%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	1,617,383,844
MTD	19,268,239,170
LTD	187,960,473,442
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	1,727,649,709

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	13,158,039,070

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	512
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	3
Number of Products Offered Today	1,111
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,485
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,497

Also attached is the Weekly Public Domain Report, containing information
which is intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron.


ditto credit.

Leslie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:42 AM
To:	Aronowitz, Alan; Calo, Andrea; Cooper, Tracy J. (EBS); Gaffney, Chris; Hansen, Leslie; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Johnston, Greg; Keohane, Peter; Korkmas, Deb; McBride, Jane; Minns, David; Nettelton, Marcus; Powell, Mark; Rossi, Robbi; Van Hooser, Steve; Viverito, John
Subject:	FW: EOL and Clickpaper Approvals: 09-24-01

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 5:58 PM
To:	Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Reves, Brant; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Arnold, Thu Pham; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Thakkar, Ami; Piotrowski, Joseph; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Curry, Ken
Subject:	EOL and Clickpaper Approvals: 09-24-01

Please see attached.

 << File: EOL 09-24-01.xls >>
Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835


John,

As of 6/15 the value in the ICAP curve was $79MM.
I have executed bilateral trades creating $3MM of New Deal value in my book.
There is now $65MM of value left in the curve.
$11MM has been spent in hedges.

FYI
From July 13 - 21 the PJM cash desk is open for you to trade.  Let me know
when you want to come down for some training.

Dana


Please, take a look at his results. Another model for CA PX.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000
02:14 PM ---------------------------

Joel Brown <energyrisk@earthlink.net> on 03/08/2000 11:00:42 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Initial simulation results

Vince,

Thanks for taking the time to look at these initial results.  They are
based on the Cal PX volumes and unconstrained market clearing price
(UMCP).  Any commercial application would involve Cal ISO loads and
zonal prices, a relatively straight-forward extension of the work.

Currently I'm working on modifying the deterministic portion of the
power price to account for the sharp increase in oil and gas prices
since last year.  I'll let you know if I make any headway in that
effort.

I'd appreciate any feedback you might have regarding these results.

Thanks Again,
Joel Brown
EnergyRisk, llc

 - SimResults.xls


I believe Greg W. is coming to talk to you today about this new business.
Further to this, I'd like to ask again how I can get access to VAR  (I
believe Lavorato and Sherriff have $5 million they each keep upstairs and
allocate to their businesses as needed temporarily).  Is this a Board
question, or do you have the authority to allocate this VAR to me?

On another note, I've been helping Bill Bradford with PGE exposure issues.
If you too need my help, let me know.

Thanks for your help...

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001
09:46 AM ---------------------------

John L Nowlan
01/04/2001 09:37 AM
To: Greg Whalley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 24-7 crude Book

Per conversation with Greg this morning, until we get board approval for new
book with VAR have agreed to use discretionary VAR as required to negate VAR
effects within global products. Position P/L will have to be reported within
Global Products but we will pull it out as a separate line item at the bottom
of the report. Positions at this time are not an issue but should it  become
a concern between now and approval of a new book we will need to address it
as we are the VAR with discretionary limits.


likely story

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schultea, Kathryn
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 3:34 PM
To:	Palmer, Lizzette; Cigarroa, Gabriella
Cc:	Cash, Michelle; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
Subject:	Email Sweeper

Hey there,

I just sent an email outside the Enron firewall that contains the word "salary" in the attachment.  So I expect it to be picked up in the HR sweeper we have activated.  Just thought I'd let you know ahead of time that you may see it and let you know it was an approved mailing.

Thanks.
Kathy


Lexi,
I have a concern regarding the summer internship position....
I am president of my sorority at OU and because of my obligations to it, I
have to be back in Norman by the 23 of July, making my last day of a summer
job the 20th of July.  I did notice that the summer analyst program is 12
weeks long and I wouldn't be able to work  a full 12 weeks.
The dates I am available are May 14-July 20.  I don't know if this presents
a problem, but I wanted to check with you.  I would really like to take the
offer if these circumstances were okay.  But I do understand otherwise. If
you could let me know as soon as possible I would appreciate it!!
Thanks so much.
Whittney Skinner
______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


I am not sure it solves matters.  Stikemans opinion points out:

1.  as I indicated this morning, "money" means actual currency - notes and
coins - not funds transferred by wire into an account, which would likely be
treated as an "intangible" resulting in the various requirements/concerns I
pointed to this morning regarding perfection by registration;

2.  although, in their view, the validity of the transfer approach would be
recognized by a court (in Ontario at least), given that the intention of the
Transfer Annex is to provide security for contingent obligations under the
Master Agreement and the lack of relevant case law, there is a material risk
that the Court would nonetheless characterize the transfer as a security
interest subject to the requirements for perfection.

With our present understanding, in the absence of any definitive case law,
and without an unequivocal opinion we can rely on, I am not sure we can rely
on the transfer approach to solve the problem, particularly with high volume
counterparties who likely are going to create the largest exposures.

Peter.

   Carol St Clair                03/20/2001 09:19 AM

To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Cash Collateral In Canada

Peter:
Thanks for responding and sorry about you having to repeat this again as I
was not aware of your previous discussions.  In Stikeman's November 2000 ISDA
Collateral Opinion, they suggest as an alternative course of action to modify
the Credit Support Annex to create a debtor/creditor relationship between the
parties and to provide for an outright transfer of cash instead of a pledge.
Do you have any thoughts on this?  Is this an alternative that we should
consider implementing with some of our more persistent high volume
counterparties who are giving us a hard time about not being able to post
cash collateral to us?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Peter Keohane
	03/20/2001 09:58 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris
Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT, Mark Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Cash Collateral In Canada

In the past few weeks, I have discussed this issue with Brent H., Mark T.
Chris G. and Mary C.  Under the PPSA jurisdictions in Canada, which includes
Alberta and Ontario among others, cash held on deposit as collateral is not
clearly categorized as "money" but more likely an "account".  Although
certain categories of collateral can be perfected by possession, including
"money", "intangibles", which includes "accounts", cannot be perfected by
possession.  The issue comes down to whether we will accept the risk that a
wire transfer to an account designated by us constitutes "money".  Although
it is not clear, the better view is that "money" means cash in hand and not
on deposit.  The risk is that an unperfected security interest is subordinate
to various parties, including a bankruptcy trustee and to subsequently taken
but properly perfected security interests.  I will admit, however, that this
seems to be a risk that others in our market take (although likely
unknowingly).

Accordingly, to perfect the "account" a registration is likely required at
the PPR, which is something we do not want to get into.

Even then, as an "account" is an "intangible" certain conflicts rules for
perfection by registration need to be considered, as the PPSA jurisdictions
provide that perfection of an intangible is governed by the laws of the
jurisdiction where the debtor is located, as determined by the location of
its principal place of business or chief executive office. i.e.  registration
may be required in some other jurisdiction entirely.  Further, an advance
search would have to be done to see if there are competing prior
registrations.  Also, as the PPR is not a guaranteed title registry,
registration priority does not necessarily guarantee security priority, and
law firms will not typically give priority opinions under the PPSA.

Lastly, if there is an insolvency and the deposit holding institution is also
a creditor of the counterparty, there may be some argument that the deposit
holding institution will assert rights of set off over the account.

In terms of updating advice, the statutory provisions have not to my
knowledge changed.  I suppose there is some possibility that a court has
recently determined that "money" includes deposits that we are not aware of,
and I could ask outside counsel to research this issue.

Peter.

   Carol St Clair                03/20/2001 07:45 AM

To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cash Collateral In Canada

Peter and Greg:
One of our counterparties is questioning why we won't accept cash collateral
in Canada.  They claim that under the current state of the law, holding cash
collateral is the method for perfecting.  Please advise.  Should we ask
Stikeman to update their advice to us on this?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Mark:
Here is a summary of what I am currently working on.
Carol


Did Sheila want Scott to participate?  Looks like the call will be too late
for him.


Steve:  here is the first set of comments from one of our lawyers.  If you
would like me to bring him to the Hill to discuss any of the items or arrange
a phone call, just let me know.  In the meantime, I will continue to gather
more comments and gather them together in one document with suggested
specific edits.  However, given your short turn around, I thought it helpful
to forward what I received ASAP.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 04/27/2000
06:14 PM ---------------------------

"Wenner, Adam" <awenner@velaw.com> on 04/27/2000 06:01:53 PM
To: "'Sandherr, Cynthia'" <csandhe@enron.com>, "'Navin, Allison'"
<anavin@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: gramm-schumer bill.DOC

 <<gramm-schumer bill.DOC>> Please see my comments re the Gramm-Schumer
Bill.

 - gramm-schumer bill.DOC


Here are the draft handouts for tomorrow's meeting with Stan.  Please channel
any comments or questions to Steve Kirk so he and Martha can get a final set
to me in Houston before the 1:30 meeting.  (Martha--pls get the final version
to me through Steve Harris and I'll get a copy for Stan.)
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/20/99 04:43
PM ---------------------------


Tom,  Attached is the Right of Way Services Agreement we discussed Friday.  I
would like to thank you and Mark for meeting with us on short notice.  We
look forward to working with you.

---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 09/13/99 11:01 AM
---------------------------

Pat Radford
09/09/99 01:38 PM
To: Ken Choyce/DEN/ECT@Enron, bbierba@ect.enron.com, Mark
Whitt/DEN/ECT@Enron, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Right of Way Services Agreement

Shonnie Daniel asked me to forward the attached document to each of you.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 12:52
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kimberly Brown                           08/28/2000 08:59 AM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F
Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammi DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Randy Gay's Wife

Just in case you did not know, Randy's wife died last week. They will be
having services today and tomorrow.  However, in lieu of flowers they would
like donations for a playground in their neighborhood.  If you want to give a
donation, please bring it by my desk.

Thanks
Kimberly


Jens,

I think I have cc'ed  you on this. John Nowlan approved and Stinson Gibner
has the curves available for you.

Vince

Jens Gobel@ENRON
11/10/2000 04:44 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Forward oil prices

Hi Vince,

Have you already heard back from John Nowlan?

Thanks a lot for your help again. Have a great weekend.

Jens

Jens Gobel
10/26/2000 12:06 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Forward oil prices

Vince,

As discussed on the phone, I am sending you the request that I have received
from Prof. Buehler. Prof. Buehler is the
head of the faculty of finance at Mannheim University in Germany. Currently,
he is writing a study about the hedging
strategy that led to the Metallgesellschaft debacle. For this study he would
like to get forward oil prices form us.

The forward oil prices should be for WTI with Cushing as the delivery point
for the time period July 1986 and December 1996
with remaining contract durations between one and ten years. It would be
ideal to get this data on a daily basis. Weekly
or monthly data is helpful as well, of course.

Since Mannheim University is among Enron's tier one recruiting universities
in Germany, it would be great if we could help
him with some data. Thanks a lot for your help.

Jens

o.korn@uni-mannheim.de on 10/10/2000 11:44:57 AM
To: Jens.Gobel@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Daten

Sehr geehrter Herr Goebel,

bezugnehmend auf Ihr heutiges Telefongespraech mit Herrn Prof.
Buehler hat mich Prof. Buehler gebeten, Ihnen genauer
darzustellen, welche Daten idealerweise fuer unsere Studie
benoetigt wuerden.

Zunaechst zum Hintergrund. Wir sind auf ENRON gestossen, weil
Eduardo Schwartz in einer seiner Arbeiten die folgende Datenquelle
angibt:

" In addition to the publicly available futures data described above,
for the purpose of this study Enron Capital and Trade Resources
made available some proprietary historical forward price curves
from 1/15/93 to 5/16/96. From these data ten forward prices were
used in estimation, ranging in maturities from two months to nine
years"

Dies laesst uns annehmen, dass Enron bestimmte Daten
verfuegbar hat.

Nun zum idealen Datensatz:

Forwardoelpreise (am besten WTI mit Lieferung in Cushing) fuer
Restlaufzeiten zwischen einem und zehn Jahren fuer den Zeitraum
Juli 1986 bis Dezember 1996. Dabei waere eine hohe
Datenfrequenz ideal (taeglich, ansonsten woechentlich oder
monatlich). Zusaetzlich waeren auch Spotpreise fuer WTI mit
Lieferung in Cushing nuetzlich.

Diese idealen Datenanforderungen werden sich vermutlich nicht
erfuellen lassen. Jedoch waere uns auch schon geholfen, wenn ein
kuerzerer Zeitraum oder eine niedrigere Datenfrequenz vorlaege.

Wir waernen Ihnen sehr dankbar, wenn Sie in Erfahrung bringen
koennten, inwiefern solche Daten von Enron zu erhalten sind.

Herzlichen Dank fuer Ihre Muehe und beste Gruesse

Olaf Korn

p.s. Bei Rueckfragen stehe ich Ihnen jederzeit gern zur Verfuegung

__________________________________________________________
Dr. Olaf Korn
University of Mannheim
Chair of Finance
D-68131 Mannheim
Germany
Tel.: ++49/621/181-1487
Fax.: ++49/621/181-1519
e-mail: o.korn@uni-mannheim.de


The Forum II meeting will take place at 6:00 p.m. on Monday, December 4, at
Vin-De-Garde, located at 3311 Sul Ross (check link below for map).

http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py?BFCat=&Pyt=Tmap&newFL=Use+Address+Below&addr=
3311+Sul+Ross&csz=Houston%2C+TX&country=us&Get%A0Map=Get+Map

Please indicate your attendance below and return to me via e-mail
(sherri.sera@enron.com):

I will attend ___

I will not attend ___

Additionally, a number of requests have been made to change the date of the
March 2001 Forum II meeting (currently scheduled to take place on Monday,
March 19).  Please indicate your availability on the following dates:

Monday, March 12 Yes ___ No ___
Thursday, March 15  Yes ___ No ___
Monday, March 26 Yes ___ No ___
Tuesday, March 27 Yes ___ No ___
Thursday, March 29 Yes ___ No ___


I can go any of the 1st 3 weeks of Dec.

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 1:11 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.; Blanchard, Timothy; Ryder, Patrick; Farmer, Daren J.; Smith, Jay; Olsen, Michael; Parks, Joe; Baumbach, David; Hull, Bryan; 'val.generes@accenture.com'; Lenhart, Matthew; 'kevin.a.boone@accenture.com'; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Rabon, Chance; Mills, Bruce
Subject:

I'm trying to get a feel for everyone's desire to play PAINTBALL in the next few weeks.  This would obviously not be sponsored by Enron b/c Enron doesn't have enough cash to buy anything right now.

So let me know if you would be interested and, if so, when you would be available to go.   The cost should be around $30-40 a person.

Please forward to anyone I have forgotten or might be interested.

-Eric


boondoggle.  golf & booze.  i need to meet with some customers.


We are making a number of significant organizational changes.  These changes
are intended to accomplish four key objectives:

First, we need to realign all our wholesale businesses around the successful
business model developed over the last decade in North America and Europe.
This model relies on extensive physical and transactional networks built
around a relatively small strategic asset position.

Second, we need to significantly streamline corporate reporting
relationships.  Particularly with Joe Sutton,s departure, the ability to
directly manage the day-to-day activities of 15 independent business units
has become increasingly difficult.

Third, we need to accomplish these changes without, in any way, compromising
the ongoing profitability of all our businesses and without delaying or
hindering our effort to monetize a significant portion of our lower-yielding
asset positions.

And fourth, as always, we need to take advantage of the reorganization to
redeploy our talent into our highest value opportunities.

ENRON WHOLESALE SERVICES

Today, we are forming Enron Wholesale Services (EWS) which will consolidate
our global wholesale businesses.  The closer alignment of our wholesale
businesses will accomplish the following: (1) enhanced communication and
coordination across business units, (2) more rapid deployment of people to
higher valued opportunities, (3) more effective prioritization of
opportunities across the wholesale business, and (4) more rapid extension of
Enron,s wholesale business model and capabilities into new industries and
markets.

Enron Wholesale Services will include our current North American, European
(including Japan and Australia), Global Markets, and Industrial Markets
operations, and will be expanded to include Enron,s Net Works business unit
as well as a new unit ) Enron Global Assets.  In addition, Enron,s merchant
businesses outside of North America and Europe will be integrated into this
new structure as described below.

Mark Frevert, currently Chairman of each of our wholesale units, will assume
the role of Chairman and CEO of Enron Wholesale Services.  Greg Whalley,
currently Chairman and CEO of Enron Net Works, will join Mark in the Office
of the Chairman as President and Chief Operating Officer.

Providing further impetus for these organizational changes, several of our
international business unit leaders have elected to move into new leadership
positions:

Rebecca McDonald, currently CEO of Enron APACHI, will join EWS as President
and CEO of Enron Global Assets. Enron Global Assets will have responsibility
for managing all of Enron,s existing energy asset portfolio outside of North
America and Europe.  Joining Rebecca in the Office of the Chairman as COO
will be Jim Hughes, currently COO of Enron APACHI.  Rebecca and Jim will
report to the EWS Office of the Chairman.

Sanjay Bhatnagar, currently CEO of Enron India, has joined EBS as CEO for the
Middle East and Asia region.  Sanjay will be responsible for building our
broadband business in this region and the current EBS team in this region
will report to Sanjay.  In this role, Sanjay will report to the EBS office of
the Chairman.  In addition, Sanjay will continue to remain responsible for
Enron,s wholesale energy business in India and will transition this business
into Enron Global Assets in the near future.

Diomedes Christodoulou, currently Co-CEO of Enron South America, has joined
EBS as Chief Commercial Officer.  Diomedes will be located in London and will
focus his origination activities on global opportunities, with near term
attention to the wholesale and enterprise sectors.  Diomedes will report to
the EBS Office of the Chairman.

Jim Bannantine, currently Co-CEO of Enron South America, will be joining EES
to lead EES, commercial efforts outside North America and Europe.  In order
to ensure a smooth transition for our South American businesses and to
facilitate our asset sales activities, Jim will remain in South America for
at least the next several months and continue to serve as CEO of Enron South
America.  Throughout the transition, Jim will report to Cliff Baxter and to
the Office of the Chairman of Enron Wholesale Services.  Following the
transition, Jim will join EES.

In addition to these changes in our international asset operations
activities, we are making the following changes in our merchant wholesale
businesses and the commercial support functions:

Enron Net Works
Louise Kitchen will assume Greg,s previous responsibilities as President and
CEO of Enron Net Works, reporting into Mark and Greg.

Enron Americas
Concurrent with the transfer to Enron Global Assets of responsibility for
operating Enron,s South and Central America asset base, all trading,
marketing, and new asset development activities in these regions will report
into a new entity, Enron Americas.  Enron Americas will have responsibility
for all wholesale merchant businesses across North, Central and South
America.  Dave Delainey, President and CEO, and John Lavorato, Chief
Operating Officer will comprise the Office of the Chairman for Enron
Americas.

Enron Europe
The Enron Europe organization, which includes Enron,s businesses in Australia
and Japan, and Enron Metals, remains unchanged under the leadership of John
Sherriff, President and CEO, and Michael Brown, Chief Operating Officer.

Enron Global Markets
Enron Global Markets, under the leadership of Mike McConnell, President and
CEO, and Jeff Shankman, Chief Operating Officer, will continue to have
responsibility for Enron,s Middle East and LNG operations.  With the
exception of Ecoelectrica in Puerto Rico, all operating power plants and
associated personnel in the Caribbean and Central America will transfer to
Enron Global Assets.  Enron Global Markets will also continue to manage the
commodity businesses in crude and products, coal, weather, insurance,
equities, interest rates, foreign exchange, and agricultural products.

Enron Industrial Markets
Enron Industrial Markets, organization, under the leadership of Jeff McMahon,
President & CEO, and Ray Bowen, Chief Operating Officer, remains unchanged.

Commercial Support for EWS
The commercial support functions for EWS will remain with, and be managed by,
the individual business units.  We are creating no incremental overhead in
the creation of EWS, and in fact hope to reduce our operating costs by more
efficient utilization and sharing of resources across EWS.

To this end we have asked several people to take on an expanded role across
EWS in addition to their ongoing roles within their business units.  These
newly defined roles are as follows:

Mid and Back Office Operations ) Sally Beck will lead Mid and Back Office
Operations across EWS.  These services will become part of Enron Net Works,
with Sally reporting to Louise Kitchen and Rick Causey, Executive Vice
President and Chief Accounting Officer.  This alignment creates a coordinated
services organization with IT and e-commerce platforms to support the
wholesale businesses and to maximize opportunities to commercialize these
services.  Mid and Back Office services for all commercial activities will
continue to be organized with dedicated operations controllers responsible
for specific commodities and/or geographic locations.
Legal ) Mark Haedicke will serve in the role of General Counsel for EWS.
Regulatory and Government Affairs ) This function will remain organized on a
regional basis.  Rick Shapiro will support all EWS businesses operating in
the Americas, and Mark Schroeder, who is based in London, will support all
European and Eastern Hemisphere operations.  Rick and Mark will also continue
to support all other Enron businesses operating in their respective regions
and will continue to report to Steve Kean, Executive Vice President and Chief
of Staff.
Public Relations ) This function is also organized primarily on a regional
basis.  Eric Thode will have responsibility for North American activity,
Enron Net Works, and Enron Industrial Markets.  Jackie Gentle will continue
in her role for Enron Europe (including Japan and Australia) and John Ambler
will have responsibility for activity outside North America and Europe as
well as providing support for Enron Global Markets and Enron Global Assets.
These individuals will also continue to have a split reporting relationship
to Mark Palmer, Vice President of Communications.
Business Analysis and Reporting ) Wes Colwell will expand his role to cover
EWS reporting in addition to his current role in North America.

Attached for your review is an organization chart for Enron Wholesale
Services which summarizes the changes described here.  As this organization
continues to evolve we will keep you informed of any additional changes.

ENRON GLOBAL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION
AND ENRON WIND

 As part of our company-wide initiative to examine our assets and investments
around the world, we are considering a variety of options with respect to
EGEP and EWC.  As a consequence, we are putting these businesses under Cliff
Baxter,s direction.  Jeff Sherrick, CEO of EGEP, and Jim Noles, CEO of Enron
Wind, will report to Cliff.

CORPORATE STAFF

 We are consolidating the corporate staff functions: Human Resources,
Government Affairs, Public Relations/Communications and Administration.  In
that regard, Cindy Olson, Executive Vice President of Human Resources and
Community Relations, will report to Steve Kean, Executive Vice President and
Chief of Staff.

COMMITTEE STRUCTURE

 In light of the increased leadership opportunities created by Enron,s
growth, the Executive Committee will be expanded to include more of our
business unit leaders.  The primary role of this committee will continue to
be the communication of relevant information across Enron,s businesses and
the coordination of activities across those businesses.  We will also be
drawing on this group to lead company-wide initiatives such as the
performance review process and evaluation and creation of new businesses.
The Executive Committee membership is shown on the attached list.

 We are also forming a new committee ) the Enron Corporate Policy Committee.
This group will be responsible for overall corporate policy, personnel
management policy and corporate strategy.  The Enron Corporate Policy
Committee membership is also shown on the attached list.

 We are confident that these changes will align our talent and our capital to
our highest return opportunities.  Please join us in congratulating and
supporting all of these individuals in their new roles.


Take me off of this list. PLEASE!!!!!


STAGA Contestant:

The STAGA 2001 tentative schedule and associate member program is now on
our website at http://www.staga.org  All entry forms for each event will be
available on line shortly.

Bill Walker
Manager of Amateur Services
South Texas Amateur Golf Association
1830 South Millbend Drive
The Woodlands, Texas 77380
281-363-8315
Fax 281-363-9888
http://www.staga.org

Other related links:
http://www.usga.org
http://www.pgatour.com
http://www.txga.org
http://www.hga.org


From: "Danielle Miller" <dmill002@hotmail.com>
To: dgioffre@hotmail.com
Subject: Fwd: FW: Fwd[2]:EMBARRASSING MOMENTS IN SPORTS,IT IS TOO FUNNY!!!!
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 15:08:20 EST

>From: "Donald E. Miller" <donald.miller@mindspring.com>
>To: "Danielle Miller" <dmill002@hotmail.com>
>Subject: FW: Fwd[2]:EMBARRASSING MOMENTS IN SPORTS,IT IS TOO FUNNY!!!!
>Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 14:37:30 -0500
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sharon.Madsen@bdk.com [mailto:Sharon.Madsen@bdk.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 1:33 PM
>To: donald.miller@mindspring.com
>Subject: Fwd[2]:EMBARRASSING MOMENTS IN SPORTS,IT IS TOO FUNNY!!!!
>
> > >
> > > Be careful when you open
>
>Sharon
> > >
> > >
> > > > THESE ARE SO EMBARRASSING!!
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>*************************************************************************
> > > >
> > > > . <<jac-soccer_1.jpg>>  <<gymnastic.jpeg_1.jpg>>  <<HOPPSAN_1.jpg>>
> > > >  <<jac-soccer_1.jpg>>  <<gymnastic.jpeg_1.jpg>>  <<HOPPSAN_1.jpg>>
> > <<jac-soccer_1.jpg>>  <<gymnastic.jpeg_1.jpg>>  <<HOPPSAN_1.jpg>>
>
>
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
 - jac-soccer_1.jpg
 - gymnastic.jpeg_1.jpg
 - HOPPSAN_1.jpg


I'll check my billing! Thanks for the
warning!

Warm regards, and thanks for the book,

Darrell

_____________________________________________
Darrell Duffie
mail  GSB Stanford CA 94305-5015 USA
phone 650 723 1976
fax   650 725 7979
email duffie@stanford.edu
web   http://www.stanford.edu/~duffie/
_____________________________________________


Please call him.  I'd be happy to spend time talking to them about the info
below if that is what they want.

Jeff

From: Cindy Derecskey@ENRON on 12/01/2000 02:53 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Harvard Business School

J, I don't have any additional information other than what is in the quote
below.  I can call Mr. Barlett or if you are not adverse to Chris calling you
directly, I will give him your number.

Let me know...

Cindy

	Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
	12/01/2000 02:28 PM

		 To: Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Harvard Business School

Happy to help.  But I'm not sure for what you are asking.

Jeff

From: Cindy Derecskey@ENRON on 12/01/2000 02:25 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Harvard Business School

Good afternoon Jeff,

Cindy Olson referred me to you, suggesting that you would have the
information mentioned below.  Enron University Affairs, Ken Lay, Jeff
Skilling, Andy Fastow and Gene Humphrey have been working with Harvard
Business School, specifically Chris Bartlett and Meg Wozny of Harvard, on a
case study of Enron.  This study is in its last phase and the only
'roadblock' is gathering additional information.  In particular, Harvard
would like information on the 'size and growth of the risk management group'.

This information will help facilitate drawing an effective comparison of the
'old' Enron and the 'new' Enron.

Let me know if you need any additional information.

Regards,

Cindy Derecskey
University Affairs
Enron Corp.

x 3-5670


Amerex shows this deal once and Mike Swerzbin shows it twice ref 477089 and
477088.  Can you check with Mike and see if this is a duplicate of not.

trade date 12-8-00
Sell  Bonneville Power Administration  $700
MID COLUMBIA  1/1/01 - 1/31/01  25mw   onpeak  .0075 fee


<TITLE>Gas Indices - IntercontentalExchange</TITLE>

IntercontinentalExchange

Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin

For Natural Gas Delivered on Wednesday, November  28, 2001

(Trade Date of Tuesday, November  27, 2001)

Click here to access index history.

* volume represents sell-side only *

 Region
    Hub	High
Low
Wtd Avg Index
Change ($)
Vol (mmBtu)

Hub Name

LOUISIANA

    <NOBR>ANR SE	          $2.0900	          $1.6200	          $1.8653	+    .0773	         335,000	American Natural Resources Pipeline Co. - SE  Transmission Pool

    <NOBR>Columbia Onshore	          $2.0000	          $1.5950	          $1.7426	+    .0098	         289,800	Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. - Onshore Pool

    <NOBR>Henry Hub	          $2.0700	          $1.6500	          $1.8990	+    .0821	       1,259,500	Henry Hub tailgate - Louisiana

    <NOBR>NGPL LA	          $2.1700	          $1.6300	          $1.9199	+    .1225	         265,800	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Louisiana Pool

    <NOBR>Tenn 500L	          $2.0500	          $1.4800	          $1.8412	+    .2200	         214,500	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 500 Leg Pool

    <NOBR>Tenn 800L	          $2.0500	          $1.4700	          $1.7692	+    .1305	         221,300	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 800 Leg Pool

    <NOBR>TETCO ELA	          $2.0000	          $1.6100	          $1.8331	+    .1944	         250,700	Texas Eastern - East LA

    <NOBR>TETCO WLA	          $2.1250	          $1.5500	          $1.8223	+    .2301	         211,800	Texas Eastern - West LA

    <NOBR>Transco 65	          $1.9700	          $1.6200	          $1.8037	+    .0136	         145,500	Transco - Station 65

    <NOBR>Trunkline ELA	          $2.0200	          $1.4600	          $1.8193	+    .1175	         138,500	Trunkline Gas Company - East Louisiana Pool

    <NOBR>TxGas SL	          $1.9800	          $1.6200	          $1.8437	+    .0955	         374,400	Texas Gas Transmission Corp.-Zone SL FT Pool

MIDCONTINENT

    <NOBR>MichCon, citygate	          $2.5000	          $1.9750	          $2.3028	+    .2782	         270,200	Michigan Consolidated

    <NOBR>NGPL Midcont	          $2.2600	          $1.7700	          $2.1324	+    .3366	         157,700	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Mid-Continent Pool

    <NOBR>NGPL Nicor, citygate	          $2.4700	          $1.8400	          $2.1943	+    .2759	       1,146,800	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nicor Citygate

    <NOBR>NGPL NIPSCO, citygate	          $2.4800	          $1.8550	          $2.2151	+    .2344	         237,800	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nipsco Citygate

    <NOBR>NNG Demarcation	          $2.4600	          $2.2000	          $2.3617	+    .2849	         234,800	Northern Natural Gas, Demarcation Pool

NORTHEAST

    <NOBR>Columbia TCO	          $2.1000	          $1.6000	          $1.8440	+    .1063	         710,500	Columbia Gas Co. - TCO Pool

    <NOBR>Dominion So.Point	          $2.2300	          $1.6000	          $1.9018	+    .1479	         243,400	Dominion - South Point

    <NOBR>TETCO M3	          $2.6000	          $1.7425	          $2.1459	+    .2367	         218,900	Texas Eastern - M3 Zone

    <NOBR>Transco Z-6 (NY)	          $2.7500	          $1.7600	          $2.1603	+    .0924	         130,200	Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. - Zone 6 (NY)

WEST

    <NOBR>El Paso non-Bondad	          $2.3800	          $2.1800	          $2.3038	+    .3327	         159,000	El Paso - San Juan Basin, Blanco Pool

    Huntingdon/Sumas	          $2.4650	          $2.3500	          $2.4238	+    .2272	         117,600	Westcoast Energy & Northwest Pipeline Corp.

    <NOBR>Opal	          $2.3000	          $2.0500	          $2.1438	+    .2545	          75,800	Opal

    <NOBR>PG&E Citygate	          $2.7200	          $2.4500	          $2.6311	+    .3528	         161,500	PG&E - Citygate

    SoCal Border	          $2.6000	          $2.3500	          $2.4317	+    .3114	         308,400	Southern California Border Points (Ehrenberg,Topock,Needles)

WEST TEXAS

    <NOBR>El Paso - Keystone	          $2.4100	          $2.1750	          $2.3286	+    .3599	         396,000	El Paso - Keystone Pool

    <NOBR>Waha	          $2.4150	          $1.9000	          $2.3326	+    .3120	         284,000	Waha Hub - West Texas

Includes all firm physical fixed price trades done from 7 AM to 11:30 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for natural gas delivered on the specified date(s).

IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.

In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.

This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.

You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.

To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com.

To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe.

©Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000
10:34 AM ---------------------------

Ross Berthelot <rossberthelot@home.com> on 10/22/2000 06:25:24 PM
Please respond to rossberthelot@home.com
To: Allison Istre <a_istre@msn.com>, Amy Allums <aallums@law.tulane.edu>,
Ashly Morgan <ashly@eatel.net>, Ben Berthelot <bberthelot@ccbcu.com>, BBBERTH
<BBBERTH@aol.com>, Beth Simon <elizabetht@worldnet.att.net>, Brian Bonjour
<brianbonjour@hotmail.com>, Callie Fuselier <CALLIEF@aol.com>, Chad Greer
<cgreer@mgm.com>, Chris Bourgeois <cbourge@home.com>, Clay and Corinne Hufft
<chufft@bellsouth.net>, Clint Eilbeck <ceilbeck@hotmail.com>, David Ural
<dural54@aol.com>, denise hopkins <dahopkins@aol.com>, Dizneach
<JDEACH@aol.com>, Dog Boy <denisnaq@home.com>, Don Edgerton
<mbdperforms@eatel.net>, Emmet Nicaud <enicaud@entechsales.com>, emily elliot
<psyee@showme.missouri.edu>, erin saporito <esaporito@crt.state.la.us>, Grace
Feng <gracefeng77@yahoo.com>, Jake Greig <jakegreig@yahoo.com>, Jenny Milliet
<j_milliet@hotmail.com>, Jerome Landreneau <LandreneauJ@aol.com>, kent walker
<kwalker609@yahoo.com>, Louis Ledet <LLedet3234@aol.com>, Luke Berthelot
<LBerth123@aol.com>, Matt Greene <megreene7@yahoo.com>, Matt Lenhart
<Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>, Mercedes Arias <ariamer@yahoo.com>, Mike Breland
<mbrelan@lsu.edu>, Mike Gooch <michael.gooch@nmfn.com>, Mom
<BGreig3234@aol.com>, Myers Namie <CLCS@MSN.COM>, Naima Patton
<npatton21@hotmail.com>, Paul Thibidoeaux <pthibod@aol.com>, Portealous
<tporteous@burke-mayer.com>, Rhett Staehling <staehling@hotmail.com>, Scott
DeHart <dehart81@hotmail.com>, Scott Naquin <scottnaquin@aol.com>, Shannon
Strange <CLCSNO@MSN.COM>, Shawn Darrah <sdarrah@lsu.edu>, Tim Dietz
<TDietz@Allstate.com>, Tom Williamson <tpwilliamson@nalco.com>, Tommy
Porteous <Porteoust@aol.com>, Zack Smith <zfoto@earthlink.net>
cc:

Subject: [Fwd: Fw: Click on the link and see what happens]]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fw: Click on the link and see what happens]
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 01:59:45 -0500
From: "Nikki Davies" <ndavies8@home.com>
Reply-To: "Nikki Davies" <ndavies8@home.com>
To: "Virginia Mire" <vlm734s@mail.smsu.edu>,"Ross Berthelot"
<rossberthelot@home.com>,"Paula Durand" <paula.durand@db.com>,"Paul
Chadick" <PJChadik@aol.com>,"Nikki Bausbacher"
<nikkib@protolink.com>,"Mom & Dad" <jbdavies@mindspring.com>,"Michelle
Perron" <MsShell328@aol.com>,"Mark Ahern"
<eiuahern@hotmail.com>,"Katherine & Jamie Howard"
<kajam@webtv.net>,"Jeremy Louviere" <jml4489@hotmail.com>,"Diana Gary"
<diana@delhommecpa.com>,"Anthony Phillips"
<anth0ny24@hotmail.com>,"Amber Mitchell" <amitche@lsu.edu>,"Adam Gula"
<tke577@webtv.net>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Yager, Gerard J SIEP-EPT-DD" <GY983773@MSXSEPC.SHELL.COM>
To: "'Nikki Davies (home)'" <ndavies8@home.com>; "'jeanne'"
<jeannec@gambitweekly.com>; "'Tracy A Fitzgerald'"
<Tracy.A.Falk@mvn02.usace.army.mil>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 3:49 PM
Subject: Click on the link and see what happens]

>
>
> > >> > > > >  >> > > >       <A HREF="
http://home.att.net/~viseguy/fun.html
> > >
> >
> >
>


Here at Enron the lawyers generate risk memos in connection with
transactions, summarizing the more important legal risks in a deal.  I've
been taking notes along the way, but I will be asking you for your thoughts
here shortly.  A discussion will be all I'm looking for at this time.

Thanks,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2001
03:35 PM ---------------------------

"Carlos Giron" <Carlos.Giron@psiusa.com> on 04/23/2001 01:48:45 PM
To: Darron.C.Giron@enron.com, Angela.teerwilliams@gte.net, Glenn@home.com,
Ralphmayers@hotmail.com, Yhaynes@mindspring.com, Mike.Kotar@psiusa.com,
ronniegiron@yahoo.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: snake

Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:45:14 -0500
From: "Bishop Keller" <BKeller@psiusa.com>
To: Carlos.Giron@psiusa.com
Subject:  snake
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="SNAKE.doc"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="SNAKE.doc"

 - SNAKE.doc


Janette:

Please make contact with the gem broker below and set a time where I can meet
him and look at some topaz, emeralds and opals.  I want to look at loose
stones.  I may need to talk to him before I go.

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001 01:24 PM -----

	Randy Young@ENRON
	02/01/2001 04:22 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: piwhite@hotmail.com
		 Subject: The "Gem Guy"

Got your voice message.  The guy with the gems in Sao Paulo is Gerson de
Castro Mendes.  His phone number is 5511 5071 6660 (His English is excellent,
so you can leave a message.)  His email address is: gemart@cepa.com.br

Pat will let Gerson know that you will be contacting him directly.  Good luck.

Regards,
Randy


Thanks for the invitation.  However, as I do not normally get home until
after 7:00 and have the dog thing I must decline.  But  thanks anyway!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Amy Oberg's brown bag, Coming Full Circle: A Plausible Future for Power
Generation has been cancelled.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.  Please keep watching for
future brown bags.


yes the 750 case, sorry I left that out.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Centilli, James
Sent:	Wednesday, February 20, 2002 10:26 AM
To:	Hyatt, Kevin
Subject:	RE: Sun Devil backhaul rate to Phoenix

Are we using the 750 Case for volumes or something else.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hyatt, Kevin
Sent:	Wednesday, February 20, 2002 10:23 AM
To:	Centilli, James
Cc:	Gadd, Eric
Subject:	Sun Devil backhaul rate to Phoenix

James, can you please run 2 cases to calculate a backhaul rate to Phoenix using Sun Devil?

case 1: Using the Capex of $290,181,156 (which includes the Red Hawk lateral), what does the rate need to be using 100% load factors for 20 years with the terminal value and our hurdle return rate of 15%?  Assume fuel at 0% for the entire term (source of gas would likely be Cal border area storage facilities).

case 2: same as above but load factors as follows:

year 1-2		50%
year 3-4		70
year 5-7		85
year 8-20	100%

We are trying to respond to Panda Energy by Friday 2/22.

thanks
kh


You are invited to attend a "brief" ETS PRC review meeting on Monday,
December 11.

One purpose of this meeting is to review the performance distribution in each
ETS Division (i.e., percentage of employees at each performance level) to
ensure comparability across the organization.  Human Resources will provide
performance distribution charts to each of you for your organizations based
on the results of your PRC meetings.

The second purpose is to review the performance ratings of the Managers and
Directors/Sr. Directors in your organization, particularly focusing on those
individuals being recommended for promotion.  Ratings will be reviewed for
all, but a detailed discussion of each individual's performance is not
intended.

The hoped for outcome of this meeting is to reach consensus prior to, and
minimize surprises during, the final ETS PRC meeting scheduled for December
15.  This will allow us to focus the majority of that meeting on the
performance of ETS' Officers.

Meeting details:
When:  December 11
Where:  EB49C2
Time:  11:00 AM-3:00 PM (lunch will be served)


TJ -
Alex doesnt have access to Lotus Notes.  Can we get a request in for him?   We use Notes to communicate within the Scheduling and RT groups.

Thanks,
JMF


Pls change my name to Greg Whiting.  Thanks.

From: Tana Jones on 09/12/2000 08:52 AM
To: Mary Lynne Ruffer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: (00-323) Margin Change for Crude Oil, Unleaded Gasoline, and Heating
Oil

Mary Lynne,

These notices will be coming by email on a going forward basis.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 08:51 AM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	09/12/2000 09:38 AM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (00-323) Margin Change for Crude Oil, Unleaded Gasoline, and
Heating Oil

Notice No. 00-323
September 12, 2000

TO:
ALL NYMEX MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX CLEARING FIRMS
ALL NYMEX OPERATIONS MANAGERS

FROM: Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT: MARGIN RATE CHANGE

Effective Date: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 (close of business)

Futures Contracts:
Crude Oil Futures
Unleaded Gasoline Futures
Heating Oil Futures

Contract Months: All Months

Rate Change:

NYMEX Division Margins on Crude Oil, Unleaded Gasoline, and Heating Oil
Futures Contracts

Effective at Close of Business on Tuesday, September 12, 2000
Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin) Old: $2,500 New: $3,000
Member Customer (Initial Margin) Old: $2,750 New: $3,300
Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin) Old: $3,375 New: $4,050

The margin credit for NYMEX Light Sweet Crude/IPE Brent Crude Oil futures
spread positions will also be increased, from $2,000 to $2,500 (at the
Clearing Member level), as of Tuesday, September 12, 2000.  The net margin
after the spread will remain unchanged.

Effective at Close of Business on Tuesday, September 12, 2000

Clearing Member(Maintenance Margin)
NYMEX Light Sweet Crude: $3,000
Less NYMEX Light Sweet/IPE Brent Crude Spread Credit: $2,500
Net Margin of Spread: $500

Member Customer (Initial Margin)
NYMEX Light Sweet Crude: $3,300
Less NYMEX Light Sweet/IPE Brent Crude Spread Credit: $2,750
Net Margin of Spread: $550

Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin)
NYMEX Light Sweet Crude: $4,050
Less NYMEX Light Sweet/IPE Brent Crude Spread Credit: $3,375
Net Margin of Spread: $675

Should you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact Artie
McCoy at (212) 299-2928 or Joe Sanguedolce at (212) 299-2855.  This notice
supersedes all previous notices regarding outright margins for the NYMEX
Crude Oil, Unleaded Gasoline, or Heating Oil Futures Contracts and the margin
credit for the NYMEX Light Sweet Crude Oil/IPE Brent Crude futures spread
positions.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdoc
=(00-323)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Donna:

See the attachment for latest recap of Brokerage Agreements.  I'll send you
the Financial Trading link separately.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 10:55 AM -----

	Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	05/10/2001 05:46 PM

		 To: John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, David J
Vitrella/Enron@EnronXGate, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa T
Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aneela Charania/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Pizzolato/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc:
		 Subject: Updated Brokerage & Related Agreement List

Here is the attachment.
Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/
----- Forwarded by Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron on 05/10/2001 05:41 PM -----

	Cheryl Nelson
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson
	05/10/2001 05:33 PM

		 To: John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, David J
Vitrella/Enron@EnronXGate, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa T
Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aneela Charania/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Pizzolato/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc:
		 Subject: Updated Brokerage & Related Agreement List

Attached is the most recent update on the status of brokerage/related
agreements you have requested.   Most agreements have been fully executed
including most recently, ITG-Europe

Reminder: I will be out of the office tomorrow and Monday.  If you have
questions in my absence about any agreements on this list, please contact
Stephanie Panus at 5-4239.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/


---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 04:04 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Enron Security @ ENRON                           12/12/2000 05:11 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Houston
cc:
Subject: Weather Alert

The potential for freezing rain and hazardous road conditions may be present
this evening and early tomorrow morning particularly in the northern and
western parts of the city. Please monitor local news and weather forecasts
and use your judgement to insure a safe commute.

The Enron building will be open for business tomorrow, Wednesday, December
13th. If there should be any change of building status, notice will be given
on the building hotline and accessible by calling 713-750-5142.


The contact person is Rick Wagner at 713-324-5605.  He is out this week, so I
am unable to ask him what type of confidentiality agreement he needs.
However, his assistant was able to provide the following information.

Continental Airlines, Inc.
1600 Smith Street
HQSMO
Houston, TX  77002

Fax: 713-324-2801

I would suggest that we start out with a confidentiality agreement just for
Enron and see how far we get.

Thanks for you help,

-Dan
x39673


Please mark your calendar for a mandatory staff meeting with Kevin Presto tomorrow, Oct. 24th from 4- 5pm in room 30c1.

Thanks

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


ATTENTION ANALYST ROTATING WITHIN THE NEXT 2 TO 3 MONTHS

Portland is a small ENA office with approximately 100 employees in power and
origination for the western region of the United States. The office is
managed by Tim Belden and  Chris Calger with the following business units:
West Power Trading, Scheduling, Middle Market, Real Time, Fundamental
Analysis, Settlements, Risk Management, and Western Origination.

Because of the size and lay-out of the Portland office, Analysts are
presented with some unique opportunities which may not be experienced in
other departments at Enron:
strong sense of teamwork.
ability to interact with other departments on a regular basis.
strong commitment to the development of  talent.
ability to rotate within the Portland office to other key functions.

Please see the following job descriptions for available position:

ENA - Transaction Group - Jonalan Page
     - Assist Originators with analysis, evaluation and structuring potential
deals
     - Modeling
     - Interacting with support functions such as tax, accounting and legal
     - Support divestiture efforts regarding the sale of Western
Origination's assets


Attached is a draft press release regarding Cinergy's purchase of the
Brownsville and Caledonia peaker plants.  This is scheduled for release prior
to the market opening on Tuesday, December 12.  If you have any changes,
please get them to me as soon as possible.  Thanks.

Eric


I am trying to activate this HSC-Hehub product but keep getting an error that
says "product is not tradeable".  Is it ready to go yet?  If not, when?

Thanks,

Eric


http://www.consultrci.com

************************************************************************
Read SCIENTECH's SourceBook Weekly article: "Making the Wires Sing: Some
Utilities Take on Challenges, Opportunities of Being Wirecoms," at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
************************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, October 31, 2000
Enron Offers to Buy Out Azurix
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

Enron Corp. announced that it has offered up to $275 million in funding
to take Azurix Corp. (NYSE: AZX) private at a buy-out price of $7 per share.
Enron owns directly and indirectly about 66 percent of Azurix, a global
water company that owns, operates and manages water and wastewater assets
and provides related services. The specific structure and timing of Enron's
proposal has yet to be determined, but the company's board is now considering
the proposal.

ANALYSIS: Azurix has been plagued with operational and financial problems
over the last 12 months, culminating in the departure of its former CEO
Rebecca Mark in late August. Enron had established Azurix in July 1998
with a $2.4 billion acquisition of Britain's Wessex Water, which provides
water and wastewater services to a U.K. population of approximately 3.5
million. Operating primarily in the United Kingdom and Latin America
(Argentina
and Brazil), Azurix was intended to be Enron's vehicle to capitalize on
what it perceived to be favorable market conditions for water investments.

Yet, Azurix has not been a profitable operation for Enron, and has been
seen as a real anomaly when compared against Enron's consistent success
in its other ventures (for example, EnronOnline). For instance, Azurix
reported year-end 1999 net income of $67 million, significantly under
projections
for what Enron had hoped for the subsidiary. After months of speculation,
Mark stepped down both as Azurix CEO and from the Enron board of directors,
and was replaced by John Garrison, Jr. Mark maintained throughout her tenure
as CEO of Azurix that the company needed time to develop core assets and
capabilities. However, this approach was in stark contrast to Enron's guiding
philosophy*as espoused by COO Jeffrey Skilling*which has moved the company
away from owning hard assets. Skilling also believed that, although acquiring
the Wessex operation gave Azurix the engineering capability and industry
knowledge to participate in the water business, privatization of the water
industry has slowed down considerably since the company began to penetrate
this market. Instead of pursuing a capital-intensive strategy for Azurix,
Skilling wanted Azurix to become more of a service-oriented business. This
change in business direction coincided with the departure of Mark.

Yet, Azurix has continued to flounder even since Mark left. In the third
quarter of this year, Enron reportedly lost $128 million in its "corporate
and other" category and attributed a fourth of the loss to the Azurix
operation.
Azurix's stock price started a marked decline in early August when it was
announced that annual results would not meet analysts' expectations. While
Azurix was taken public in June 1999 at a price of $19 per share, it currently
is priced at $6 1/4 (at close of the markets on Oct. 30). This is an
approximately
$3 increase from what Azurix had been trading at recently, presumably due
to Enron's announcement of the proposed buyout.

Enron's buyout offer comes after four unnamed parties approached Enron
about buying its stake in Azurix. Reportedly, three out of the four potential
buyers were unwilling to pay more than $4 per share, although one of the
buyers initially considered an offer of $7 per share, but ultimately decided
against the purchase. Enron's motivation in returning Azurix to a private
status is probably one of protecting its shareholders. Enron pointed out
in its announcement that shareholders would receive, on a timely basis,
a cash payment for their shares that is significantly above the price of
the shares at which Azurix has traded over the last several months.

Making matters worse for Enron, a group of plaintiffs, represented by New
York law firm Wechsler Harwood Halebian & Feffer LLP, have initiated a
class-action lawsuit against Azurix in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas. The plaintiffs seek to recover damages
on behalf of all investors who purchased Azurix stock during the period
of June 9, 1999 (the date of Azurix's IPO) and Aug. 8, 2000, and who "suffered
damages as a result." The law firm is claiming that Azurix violated the
Federal securities laws. I placed a call to the law firm this morning in
hopes of getting additional information about what the class-action suit
entails. Unfortunately, I did not receive a call back before press time.

The consensus among the vast majority of U.S. energy companies is that
the profitability of water as a convergence strategy is questionable. The
most obvious negative about the water business is that it most likely will
remain a heavily regulated delivery business, offering few opportunities
for private companies to penetrate the market. Water is a very staid business
that seems inconsistent with Enron's aggressive growth strategy. After
Enron secures a fair return for Azurix's shareholders, it is not clear
what the company will do with its water subsidiary, but I would not be
surprised if Azurix is sold to another company. However, in August*right
before Mark's departure*Azurix announced that it had begun a pilot program
in the Lower Rio Grande using its Internet exchange Water2Water.com. The
site will provide users with information, price transparency and efficiency
in water exchanges. This announcement indicated that Azurix would begin
trading water rights, adding this commodity to the growing list of Enron's
traded commodities (energy, telecom, weather derivatives, etc.). So it
may be the case that Enron keeps Azurix, but turns it into a water trading
operation as opposed to water and wastewater services. In any case, the
present objective for Enron will be financing the buyout and ensuring that
Azurix's shareholders receive a significant premium to the market price
of Azurix. Enron also wants to ensure other benefits to Azurix, including
a significant near-term reduction in Azurix's general and administrative
expenses, greater certainty to Azurix's customers and employees and increased
flexibility for restructuring Azurix's assets and business.
===============================================================
Need to design and implement your IT infrastructure? Learn more about
SCIENTECH's
Information Technology team and what they can do for you at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/web/Depts-IT.html
===============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and in the body of the email type "remove."