As you all are probably aware, we trade physical and financial products with
Northern Illinois Gas Company under each of the following names:

1  Northern Illinois Gas Company (the legal incorporated entity)
2.  Nicor Gas Company (an assumed name for Northern Illinois Gas Company as
reflected in the Assumed Name Certificate dated 12/15/99 filed with the
Secretary of State of Illinois.  The name needs to match the Assumed Name
Certificate, no "Co.")
3.  Northern Illinois Gas Company d/b/a Nicor Gas Company

The EnronOnline counterparty has been set up as "Nicor Gas Company".

Pursuant to Bob Bruce's conversation with our Illinois outside counsel, we
are comfortable transacting business in the State of Illinois under the
assumed name "Nicor Gas Company".  In connection therewith, it is OK to set
up the online entity as "Nicor Gas Company", and attach the relevant physical
or financial products to the relevant master under each of the above
counterparty names.  Further, it will be OK if the confirmations go out as
"Nicor Gas Company" even though the masters may be under one of the above
names.

PLEASE NOTE, HOWEVER, this should be considered an exception to the rule.  We
do not want counterparties to be set up under assumed names, d/b/a's or
divisions for EnronOnline.  As previously agreed with the Online team, every
attempt should be made to incorporate the legal name as part of the
counterparty name (such as "Northern Illinois Gas Company d/b/a Nicor Gas
Company" or "Koch Industries, Inc. acting through its Koch Hydrocarbon
Company Division").   Any exceptions to this should be run by Legal for
approval.


I apologize if you have received previous confirmations.  I am having some
problems with my e-mail.

This e-mail will confirm the site visit by your company at LV Cogen I & II.
The relevant information is as follows:

	LV Cogen
Site Visit Date	Wednesday, October 25, 2000
Site Visit Time	8:00 AM to 12:00 PM
Directions to Hotels/Site	See DealBench - LV Cogen (Section V through End) Due Diligence
List/Plant Pictures Section
Meeting Time/Place	Las Vegas Cogen
	1701 East Alexander Road
	North Las Vegas, NV  89030

	Meet Bill Williams at 8:00 AM
Enron Site Visit Coordinator	Bill Williams
	503.464.8958 (O)
	503.704.9801(M)
	bill.williams@enron.com
Enron Site Visit Team	Bill Williams
	Dan Hammonds
	Mark Mullen
	Plant Manager
	Plant Engineer

Pursuant to the Site Visit Procedures sent you by CSFB, if you have not
already done so, please send me the following:
List of your team members and titles
For outside consultants, state their employer
Name, phone number (office and mobile) and e-mail address of your designated
deal team leader

Lastly, I will serve as the due diligence coordinator for LV Cogen I & II,
handling all questions and responses.  Should you have any due diligence
questions or require copies of any oversized documents, please contact me at
713.345.8992.


Dear Vince,

I just left voice mail for you.  We are interested in obtaining copies of
the papers you'll be using as the basis for your presentations on Thursday
and Friday so that we can get these materials distributed.  Can you call me
at 225-388-0447 so we can discuss this?  I would also like to be able to go
over the schedule with you just to make sure that we are on the same page.

Thanks for taking the time to visit us.  We are looking forward to your visit.

Sincerely,

Jim Garven

_________________________________________
James R. Garven
William H. Wright, Jr. Endowed Chair for Financial Services
Department of Finance
2158 CEBA
E. J. Ourso College of Business Administration
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA  70803-6308

Voice (225) 388-0477  |  Fax: (800) 859-6361

E-mail:  jgarven@lsu.edu
Home Page: http://garven.lsu.edu
Vita: http://garven.lsu.edu/dossier.html
Research Paper Archive: http://garven.lsu.edu/research.html
_________________________________________
 - att1.htm


Ed,

Here is a list of the risk people that will be with the estate.  After this weekend, we will no longer have access to the estate files, these people will be able to help you with any of your questions.  We will still be around to assist them if needed.

Thanks

KK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Romero, Araceli
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:59 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	Estate Group List

Here you go...

AC


Tom:

I'm trying to finalize the ISDA Master Agreement with these guys.  We have
one issue:

If there is a long-term market disruption event (i.e. over 3 days), and we
have no fallback price, then we negotiate a price and ENA would normally
obtain 2 quotes and average them.  Our position is that we prefer to obtain
the quotes because if a disruption were to occur, we would obtain quotes for
hundreds of deals in the same manner (because our agreements will all have
the same provisions) and it is possible that 4 quotes may not be available.

NYSEG would like for each of ENA and NYSEG to obtain 2 quotes and then
average the 4 quotes.

Are you agreeable to this?

Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 12/07/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	4,125
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,281
Total Life to Date Transactions	508,065

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 12/07/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,377	77%
Enron Europe Limited	200	35%
Global Products	180	32%
Enron Metals	368	15%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	55%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	3,261,738,861
MTD	25,090,717,613
LTD	304,261,134,658
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	3,342,091,949

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	19,976,883,663

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	598
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	2
Number of Products Offered Today	1,048
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,215
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,941


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Matt
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:44 AM
To:	O'Malley, Justin
Subject:

hey, don't forget that report...Keith's bugging me.  thanks.


I am so proud of you!  You know that it was so hard for Tana and me to have
to point out your shortcomings, but it certainly appears that you put a lot
of thought into what we said.  You are still my favorite ENA credit person
(of course, Jane is my favorite EBS credit person).

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
Marie.Heard@Enron.com

	Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/31/2001 08:03 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ode to the Legal Lady's of Swap and a Sempra Energy Credit W/S

Dear Legal Lady's

I would like to further reinstate my status of favorite Credit Person, I know
as of late my status had been slipping and I must confess I have no one to
blame but myself.  I want you to know that after a lot of deep thought and
pondering of my potential status downgrade, I have resolved myself to pull
from deep inside and work to maintain my status.  Although my mates in credit
have provided some strong competition to remove me from favorite credit
status, I am here to tell you that I am committed 150% to remain as your
favorite credit person!!!!!

Yours Truly,
Russell

Now, that being said, my commitment is demonstrated by the submittance of the
Sempra Energy Solutions Credit Worksheet.

Thanks again,
Russell


I have put this file together for our investigation.  Have to run to a meeting, can discuss later.

Stacey


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
12:32 PM ---------------------------

Sevil Yaman@ENRON
10/18/2000 10:42 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: power conference

Vince,

Please check the University of California Energy Institute web site (
http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei/). You may already be aware of it but if
you are not, there are lots of paper that I am using as a reference and that
you might be interested in reading them. Also, every year they are holding a
one day power conference in UC Berkeley. I'd like to attend the one in March
of 2001. Is that fine?

Sevil,


There is a document called "CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS" in Marie's directory
where we all input any CA we have sent.  For some reason since last week it
has appeared as a "read only" document", so I cannot input the agreements I
am working on right now.  Can you get that fixed.  Thanks!


Telecommunications Reports presents . . . . . TR's State NewsWire
January 23, 2001 2 P.M. Edition

STATES
PENNSYLVANIA -- Appellate court upholds Nextel wireless tower permit
MICHIGAN -- PSC approves Ameritech identity theft protection procedures
MICHIGAN -- PSC OKs revised Ameritech 'recip comp' rates
HAWAII -- Legislators to examine telemarketing fraud
MICHIGAN -- PSC fines companies for 'slamming'
UTAH -- Bill would increase telecom access in rural schools
FLORIDA -- Consumer group says local competition in Florida has failed
MISSOURI -- Bill would let colleges establish 'telecommunity centers'
VIRGINIA -- Legislator proposes license plate commemorating state's tech
heritage
IDAHO -- PUC sets new hearing on high-cost fund
TEXAS -- ALJ sets hearing on 'slamming' complaint

WIRELESS
PENNSYLVANIA
Appellate court upholds Nextel wireless tower permit

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has upheld a decision by the
Newlin Township Zoning Board to allow Nextel Communications, Inc., to
build a telecommunications tower in Newlin.

The opinion, written by President Judge Joseph T. Doyle, upheld a trial
court decision to defer to the town's zoning board.  The citizens
opposing the tower said the board erred when it defined Nextel's
proposed tower as a "radio transmitter."

The Newlin Township zoning ordinance limits the types of buildings that
can be constructed but allows the board to grant a "special exemption"
to authorize the construction of a "radio or television transmitter."
The ordinance, however, doesn't define "radio transmitter."

The citizens asserted that the "radio transmitter component of the
facility is but a minor element" and said the 150-foot tower "falls far
outside any commonly understood definition of 'radio transmitter.'"
They argued that because the tower doesn't fit into any other category,
the zoning ordinance doesn't permit it to be constructed within the
township.

Judge Doyle ruled that the record supported the board's decision.  The
judge noted that testimony by a Nextel engineer demonstrated that the
tower was an integral part of the facility.  He concluded that the
"entire system operates together in order to transmit the necessary
information for the cellular network to function."

Senior Judge William J. Lederer and Judge Bonnie B. Leadbeter joined
Judge Doyle's opinion.  (Case no. 3182 C.D. 1999 Robert and Loren
Pearson v. Zoning Hearing Board of Newlin Township and Nextel
Communications of the Mid Atlantic, Inc.)

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
MICHIGAN
PSC approves Ameritech identity theft protection procedures

The Public Service Commission today approved procedures proposed by
Ameritech-Michigan to protect customers from identity theft.  The
commission had ordered Ameritech to file the proposed procedures when it
fined the company $1.5 million for identity theft-related violations of
the Michigan Telecommunications Act.  (9/25/00 p.m.)  The PSC's decision
responded to a complaint filed by customer Patricia Nelski.

In July 1996 Nelski discovered that a fraudulent Ameritech telephone
account had been opened in her name.  She contacted Ameritech and was
told she wouldn't be held responsible for charges to the account.  She
subsequently learned that she had been denied credit and employment
because Ameritech failed to clear her credit record as promised.

Under the procedures approved today, Ameritech must (1) accurately
verify the identity of persons ordering service, (2) ensure that
accounts referred to collection agencies and credit reporting bureaus
are attributed to the responsible parties, and (3) keep records on
accounts referred to collection agencies and credit bureaus for the
duration of any adverse credit reports that result.  The company also
must ensure that all negative credit information is removed from credit
reports when an account has been deemed fraudulent, and it must respond
in a timely manner to customer complaints about fraudulent accounts or
identity theft.  (Case no. U-12700)

SECTION 251/252
MICHIGAN
PSC OKs revised Ameritech 'recip comp' rates

The Public Service Commission today approved Ameritech-Michigan's
proposed revisions to its reciprocal compensation rate structure.
Ameritech had proposed a bifurcated rate structure that reduces the
current charges applied to minutes of use and shifts recovery to a setup
charge applied to each call, without regard to duration.

The commission noted that Ameritech's showing that a rate structure
predicated on separate per-call setup and per-minute usage charges
better reflects cost causation wasn't rebutted by any of the other
carriers participating in the case.  Moreover, the PSC said, the revenue
effects of the Ameritech plan are largely neutral to the extent that the
traffic being exchanged reflects the average holding time used to set
the charges.
The PSC rejected Ameritech's request to exempt foreign exchange service
from payment of reciprocal compensation.  The commission said Ameritech
failed to explain whether, or how, the means of routing a call placed by
one local exchange carrier's (LEC's) customer to another LEC's point of
interconnection affects the costs that the second LEC necessarily incurs
to terminate the call.  Historically, the PSC said, the routing of a
call hasn't depended on whether it's a local call or a toll call.

Moreover, the commission said, the discretion that competitive local
exchange carriers exercise in designing their local calling areas is a
competitive innovation that enables them to provide valuable
alternatives to an ILEC's traditional service.  The PSC saw no reason to
change these standards, particularly when the result would be an
unnecessary restriction on the services the customers want and need.
(Case no. U-12696 - In the matter of the application of Ameritech
Michigan to revise its reciprocal compensation rates and rate structure
and to exempt foreign exchange service from payment of reciprocal
compensation)

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
HAWAII
Legislators to examine telemarketing fraud

Sen. Brian Kanno (D., District 20) has introduced SB 97 to make
telemarketing fraud a criminal offense.  An individual would be
committing telemarketing fraud if the person--with the intent to defraud
or misrepresent--obtained, or attempted to obtain, the transfer of
possession, control, or ownership of property from another person
through communications conducted at least in part by telephone.

SB 97 would make telemarketing fraud a "class B" felony.  The measure
awaits consideration by the Senate Economic Development and Technology
Committee; the Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection, and Housing
Committee; and the Senate Judiciary Committee.

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
MICHIGAN
PSC fines companies for 'slamming'

The Public Service Commission today fined Accutel Communications, Inc.,
and Advantage Plus $43,600 and $105,000, respectively, for "slamming."
The commission's order adopts an administrative law judge's
recommendations.  (11/7/00 p.m.)

The ALJ found that Advantage Plus had performed an unauthorized switch
of a residential customer's telecom service provider and billed
unauthorized charges to that same customer's business.  Advantage Plus
is a reseller of Qwest Corp.'s services.

The ALJ also found that Accutel had charged the same business for a
service for which the telecom service provider hadn't received an
initial affirmative order.  (Case no. U-12545)

ADVANCED SERVICES
UTAH
Bill would increase telecom access in rural schools

Sen. Beverly Ann Evans (R., District 26) has sponsored a bill to require
the Utah Education Network (UEN) to work with rural county governments
to establish education resource centers in their counties.  The UEN
maintains an education microwave distribution system, data network, and
other telecom service distribution systems appropriate for providing
video, audio, and data services for public schools and colleges.

SB 124 would require the UEN to set up such centers in at least Beaver,
Daggett, Garfield, Juab, Kane, Morgan, Piute, Rich, and Wayne counties.
The centers would consist of four classroom facilities provided by the
counties, with equipment funded by the state.  The equipment would be
capable of bringing the full benefits of the UEN satellite system to
community residents.  It also would offer residents access to worldwide
databases through multimedia computers and advising services through
online technologies.

The bill would allocate $743,000 to the UEN to fund the centers.  Of
that appropriation, $441,000 would go toward one-time costs for
electronic equipment, and $302,000 would be allocated for ongoing costs.

SB 124 awaits committee referral.

COMPETITIVE LOCAL ENTRY
FLORIDA
Consumer group says local competition in Florida has failed

Florida has seen little improvement in local phone competition since the
U.S. Congress passed the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 nearly
five years ago, according to a new report from the Consumer Federation
of America (CFA).  CFA Director-Research Mark Cooper, who wrote the
study, says, "97% of Florida's local residential market is still under
the control of the incumbents--BellSouth [Telecommunications, Inc.],
Sprint [Corp.], and Verizon [Communications, Inc.]."

The study recommends several steps the Public Service Commission should
take to foster local competition.  It says the PSC should (1) guarantee
that new competitors can readily access the existing telephone network,
(2) ensure that competitors are charged reasonable prices for network
access and (3) ensure that operation support systems can accommodate the
demands of new competitors.

Local competition can begin to thrive in Florida, as it has in New York
and Texas, only if the PSC requires "the local monopolies to open their
markets on fair and reasonable terms," says Cooper.

The study, titled Florida Consumers Need Real Local Phone Competition:
Fair Access to Monopoly Wires Is the Key, is available at
http://www.consumerfed.org/fl.telecom.0101.pdf.

INTERNET
MISSOURI
Bill would let colleges establish 'telecommunity centers'

Sen. Mary Groves Bland (D., District 9) has introduced SB 154 to allow
all colleges, universities, and community colleges in Missouri to create
"telecommunity centers" for teaching local residents computer skills.

The telecommunity centers would use the schools' existing information
technology resources to provide the technical staff and technology
necessary to teach local residents how to use current hardware and
software.  Technical staff members could be volunteers or students who
were at least senior-level undergraduates.  Schools could allow students
to earn course credits for working at the centers.

SB 154 also would require each higher-level institution to create a
policy ensuring that "students of the institution are afforded necessary
access to all available information technology resources."

SB 154 has been referred to the Senate Committee on Education.  Its text
is available at
http://www.senate.state.mo.us/01info/billtext/intro/SB154.htm.

INTERNET
VIRGINIA
Legislator proposes license plate commemorating state's tech heritage

Del. James K. O'Brien (R., District 40) has introduced HB 2560 to
authorize the issuance of "special license plates bearing the legend,
Home of the Internet."

The bill has been referred to the Committee on Transportation.  Its text
is available at
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?011+ful+HB2560.

UNIVERSAL SERVICE
IDAHO
PUC sets new hearing on high-cost fund

The Public Utilities Commission has rescheduled a Jan 29 hearing on its
high-cost fund for March 20-21.  (11/2/00 a.m.)  The commission
rescheduled the hearing after Qwest Corp. filed a notice stating its
intent to withdraw from a stipulation it had reached with the PUC staff
regarding the fund.  The company said it was withdrawing because "it
realized that it might not have reached a 'meeting of the minds' with
the staff regarding a critical issue:  specific IHCF [high-cost fund]
per-line support for wire centers serviced by Qwest and Verizon"
Northwest, Inc.

Qwest also asked the commission to vacate the current schedule and give
the company an additional 30 days to "either attempt to meet a mutually
acceptable agreement with staff or offer another independent alternative
for the parties' consideration."  After Qwest asked the commission to
vacate the schedule, Verizon and AT&T Communications of the Mountain
States, Inc., made schedule requests of their own.  Verizon and AT&T,
however, wanted the PUC to suspend the schedule indefinitely.

The commission granted Qwest's request and said the company should file
its revised direct testimony by Feb. 5.  Rebuttal testimony will be due
Feb. 28.  (Case nos. GNR-T-97-22 and GNR-T-00-2)

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
TEXAS
ALJ sets hearing on 'slamming' complaint

A Public Utility Commission administrative law judge has scheduled an
April 24 hearing to consider a "slamming" complaint filed against Axces,
Inc.  Slamming is the unauthorized switch of a customer's telecom
carrier.  Earlier this month, the PUC staff asked the commission to fine
Axces up to $930,000 for "slamming" 186 customers.

The staff said the proposed fine amounted to $5,000 per violation.  It
said the penalty was "appropriate" because the PUC views slamming as one
of the "most serious" violations that a telecom provider can commit.
The staff also said stiff fines were warranted to deter Axces from
committing future violations.  The staff pointed out that Axces'
"pattern of slamming" has continued despite the fact that the company
paid a $100,000 penalty to the PUC in 1998 for alleged slamming
activities.  (01/9/01 a.m.)

The ALJ determined that prehearing conferences should be held every
three weeks to resolve any outstanding discovery issues and preliminary
matters.  The conferences are scheduled for Jan. 26, Feb. 16, March 9,
March 30, and April 20.

Staff's prefiled direct testimony is due March 9, and objections to the
staff's testimony are due March 16.  Responses to those objections are
due March 23.  Axces' prefiled direct testimony also is due March 23,
and objections to Axces' testimony are due March 30.  Responses to those
objections are due April 6.

The staff's rebuttal testimony is due April 11, and objections to the
staff's rebuttal testimony are due April 16.  (SOAH Docket no.
473-00-0731 and PUC Docket no. 20934)

Federal law prohibits duplication in any form, including electronic,
without permission of the publisher.

TR's State NewsWire Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000 Telecommunications
Reports International, Inc. (ISSN 1082-9350) is transmitted each
business day at 8 a.m. and 2 p.m., except holidays.
Telecommunications Reports International, Inc.
1333 H St. NW, Suite 100-E
Washington, DC 20005-4707

Associate Editor for Online Publications: Jennifer Erschen, E-mail:
jerschen@tr.com
Senior Legislative & Regulatory Analyst: Gayle Kansagor, E-mail:
gkansagor@tr.com
Senior Research Analyst: Steve Arlowe, E-mail: sarlowe@tr.com
Senior Analyst: Barney McManigal, E-mail: bmcmanigal@tr.com
Account Services: Eileen Callahan (202) 312-6116, (202) 842-3023 (fax)
E-mail: ecallahan@tr.com


Scandinavian Gas and Power
11th & 12th February 2002
Hotel Bristol, Oslo
www.ibcenergy.com/scandinavia/?source-sw689em1178e

***Don't miss this opportunity to hear from the leading industry players within the field***

Dear Mr Lay

IBC's Scandinavian Gas and Power conference will be the industry platform to discuss the latest strategic and technical developments in the field. The main objective is to explore the issues of production and distribution, energy deregulation, exports, LNG technology, modern technologies and new projects as well as investment opportunities and finance in the exciting marketplace of Denmark, Norway and Sweden.  Full programme and speaker details available at
www.ibcenergy.com/scandinavia/?source-sw689em1178e

Speakers from:
ABS Europe
Eltra
First Securities
Hafslund
Statoil
Vattenfall
Hafslund
Norsk Hydro
Sinclair Roche & Temperley
Svensk Energi
Statnett
Norwegian School of Management
Danish Energy Agency, Ministry of
Environment and Energy
Norwegian University of Science and
Technology (NTNU)

There are a number of ways for you to register for this vital conference simply call our bookings hotline + 44 (0)1932 893851.  Alternatively, book via the dedicated webpage @ www.ibcenergy.com/scandinavia/?source-sw689em1178e

I look forward to meeting you in February in Oslo.
Yours sincerely,

Panagiotis Panagopoulos
Conference Producer
IBC Energy and Commodities Team

PS - To receive a free monthly e-newsletter detailing our new conferences, please sign up at http://www.ibcenergy.com/emailupdate

-----------------------------------------------------------------

If you do not wish to receive information and news on this subject in future please reply to this email with the message UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line and you will be instantly removed from this list. Please note that as this is an automated operation replying with unsubscribe in the text of a message will have no effect.

The personal information shown in this e-mail, or provided by you, will be held on a database and may be shared with companies in the Informa Group in the UK and internationally.  Sometimes your details may be obtained from external companies for marketing purposes.  If you do not wish your details to be used for this purpose, please write to the Database Marketing Manager, Informa UK, Enterprise House, 45 Station Approach, West Byfleet, Surrey, KT14 6NN.  E-mail database@ibcuk.co.uk


Account Information

	Help

Do not reply to this message. If you did not request this account,  click
here.

Registration Confirmed - Welcome to Yahoo!
This message confirms your new account with Yahoo!.

?

Your Yahoo! ID:
alphaman_2001
Your email address:
errol.mclaughlin@enron.com

?
What if the email address listed above is incorrect or changes in the future?
Please keep your email contact current so we can help you in case you can't
access your Yahoo! account.  To update your email address, first sign into
My Yahoo! or any other Yahoo! personalized service.  Then click on "Account
Info" at the top of the page.  (If "Account Info" is not available, please
click on "Options" first, then on "Account Info.")  The field you need to
change is called "Alternate email address."

?
							What can I do with my new Yahoo! ID?
Yahoo! Mail	Yahoo! Mail
	Get your own yahoo.com email address		Yahoo! Auctions	Yahoo! Auctions
				Buy and sell for free.		[IMAGE]	Yahoo! Chat
							Chat with people from all over the world.

Yahoo! Calendar	Yahoo! Calendar
	Keep yourself organized.		My Yahoo!	My Yahoo!
				Customize the way you use the internet.		Yahoo! Games	Yahoo! Games
							New and classic online games.

Yahoo! Travel	Yahoo! Travel
	Reservations, tickets, discounts and information.		Yahoo! Shopping	Yahoo! Shopping
				Search for your favorite products and brands and compare prices.		Yahoo! Messenger	Yahoo!
Messenger
							Get notified when you have new mail and send instant messages.

Show me more...
Thank you for signing up at Yahoo!
?

What if I didn't request this account?

Please click here if you didn't request it or no longer wish to have it.   If
you are then prompted for the deletion key, please cut and paste the
following to the text box as requested on the deletion page:
IXtKZnt3f2Z6ZnloNTc3NjiOIXlKT3hOcnJyYnV9fE9hMiF1Sk4xNjdONDMwMCFzSnqO

You could also reply to this email (and make sure to copy this entire email
in your  reply) with REMOVE as the subject line.

[192.152.140.9]


eSource presents Lexis-Nexis training

ADVANCED

This session will cover advanced searching tips.  It will also cover using
Smart Indexing to narrow your search results.  Find out how to customize your
desktop for easier searching.

Attend our Lexis-Nexis Advanced Clinic:

May. 18     8:30 - 10:00 AM    EB572

PUBLIC RECORDS

Lexis-Nexis is the premier provider of public record information.  We will
learn about materials available to you including Secretary of State Filings
and DBA's, UCC filings, Bankruptcies, and Property Records.  If you are doing
due diligence on companies, especially smaller ones, this is a session you
will want
to attend.

Attend our Lexis-Nexis Public Records Clinic:

May. 18    10:30 AM -12:00 NOON      EB572

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928
Cost $25.00 Per Person
No Shows will be charged $50.00
* Please bring your Lexis-Nexis login ID and password. If you don't have one,
a guest ID will be provided.

Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations.

http://esource.enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/24/99 08:44
AM ---------------------------

"Special Offers Admin" <special-offers-admin@mail.southwest.com> on 11/23/99
12:34:40 AM
Please respond to "Special Offers" <special-offers@mail.southwest.com>
To: "Special Offers" <special-offers@mail.southwest.com>
cc:  (bcc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Special Sale Continues from Southwest Airlines

Southwest Airlines is offering fares from $29
each way with roundtrip purchase.

Go to http://www.southwest.com/hotfares for more
details.  Hurry - these special sale fares must
be purchased by December 2, 1999.

** These fares are valid for travel November 30, 1999
through March 31, 2000. Ticketless Travel must be purchased
online at www.southwest.com by midnight Pacific
Standard Time, December 2, 1999. ** Seven-day advance
purchase, roundtrip travel and overnight stay are required.

The fares listed do not include airport taxes of up to
$12 roundtrip. Fares shown are each way based on roundtrip
purchase. Fares do not include a federal excise tax of up
to $2.50 that will be imposed on each flight segment of
your itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff
and a landing.

************************************************************
Purchase your December 8th Billboard Music Awards Tickets
with your Southwest Airlines Vacations package to Las Vegas
when you visit: http://www.swavacations.com/index1.htm
************************************************************

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 1999 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: [sshackl@ect.enron.com]
To unsubscribe, send email to
leave-special-offers-97904730L@mail.southwest.com
or unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email


stop

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:41 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

thanks for calling sir


i will go if you want me to - does that sound familiar?

Shanna Husser@ENRON
03/20/2000 02:33 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

OK- Would I have asked you if I didn't want you to go??  Just like a woman.

 In all honesty- if you don't want to go- I probably won't go either.  I am
not a huge professional baseball fan- it is so slow!-  so to go to something
like that I really need to enjoy the people that I am with.  Don't think that
the tax department necessarily falls into that category- but would be
bareable if you were there. Just a side thought- but my dad would be so mad
if he knew I had the opportunity to go- but didn't.  Don't know why that just
popped in my head.  I guess I write e-mails using "stream of consciousness"
also.

Also- you know- you and Jennifer are a lot alike.  You know how you send me
ugly e-mails when you are the last person on any group e-mail that I send
out.  Well- she is even worse- she just called and yelled at me- b/c she was
not the FIRST person on a group e-mail that I sent.

SH

	From:  Eric Bass @ ECT                           03/20/2000 02:20 PM

To: Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

do you want me to go?

Shanna Husser@ENRON
03/20/2000 01:15 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Hey-

April 10th Astros game vs. St. Louis- do you want to go??  I need to let them
know if I want another to get on the list for an extra ticket.

SH


I will print when I get in this am.  It may be that I need to use good ole Word Perfect.  If the last page you are talking about are only the instructions regarding duties of POA, then its not very important.  See you later.

K-

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Thu 11/8/2001 9:48 PM
To: Carnahan, Kathleen
Cc:
Subject:

I am having a difficult time printing the POA.  The last pages don't print and the margins are wide. Can you help?


713 851 2499
--------------------------
Rick S.

-----Original Message-----
From: 7409950@skytel.com <7409950@skytel.com>
To: Shapiro, Richard <Richard.Shapiro@ENRON.com>
Sent: Mon Oct 22 19:59:04 2001

Reply Message:
Reply from PALMER MARK  is Send # to call to Text message

Original Message:
Richard.Shapiro@enron.com|Fw: Uncle--you can have the Public Affairs Committee IF....|Any interest?
--------------------------
Rick S.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lynne Church <LCHURCH@epsa.org>
To: rshapiro@enron.com <rshapiro@enron.com>
Sent: Mon Oct 22 15:52:22 2001
Subject: Uncle--you can have the Public Affairs Committee IF....

You let me have Mark Palmer as the chair.  I would like to have at least
a vp for the most important committees.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I understand Mick's point of view...So for everyone, I will also share my
day...Get out of bed, shower, brush teeth, comb hair, don't forget that
deodrant(that's both arms)...Take the bus..book deals til 5 p.m. and calc
three books....Get the point.  We are all busy, welcome to Enron.  I think
the point of the message, which I think should be directed at a few
individuals that have shown a pattern..DON'T COMMITT YOURSELF TO SOMETHING
YOU DO NOT INTEND TO DELIVER UPON.
PL


Tana Jones is out of the office and will return Thursday, November 29.


Jonny,

Thank you so much for the email and kind words.  I was very moved by it and
you know I feel the same way.  I have become very reflective with the more
"success" that I have been fortunate enough to receive.  I am so thankful and
appreciative and although I have always been religious and spiritual, it has
grown more deeply.  I see so many people that have lost their perspective and
I pray that I will remain grounded and truly appreciate the blessings that
our family has received.  Chris and I often discuss how we can help others
and what can we do to really make a difference.

The Jones and the McConnells are truly very lucky.   Thanks, and give my love
to your family.

Mike

PS:  What about OU - Texas, do you have any ideas or plans already in the
works?

"Jonny Jones" <jjones@jonesenergy.com> on 08/02/2000 03:55:19 PM
To: "Mike McConnell (E-mail)" <mike.mcconnell@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Way to go!

Sometimes we fail to stop and reflect on events which are of significance
because we are so busy with our heads down accomplishing the things we
strive for.  I hope you are taking a moment to reflect and enjoy the
incredible accomplishments which you have achieved at such a young age.  You
and I are two of the luckiest people in the world and must always remember
to give back what we have been so fortunate to receive.

Congratulations and keep up the good work.  I am proud to call you my
friend.

Jonny


I vote for you.

From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/01/2001 04:08 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Mitro/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: RE: TECO

Do you want to send the LOI to TECO, or should I?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:32 PM
To: Mitro, Fred
Cc: Jacoby, Ben
Subject: RE: TECO

I don't believe we need Keffer's input to process the LOI.  I can have their
power guy look at the term sheet if we think we are done with it.

From: Fred Mitro/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/01/2001 12:42 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: RE: TECO

Kay:

I will review your comments on the LOI.  I wanted to check with make sure
that someone at King & Spalding is reviewing the Midway term sheet along with
the LOI, so that we can send the term sheet to TECO on Monday/Tuesday.

Let me know.

Fred

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 11:45 AM
To: Jacoby, Ben; Mitro, Fred
Cc: jkeffer@kslaw.com
Subject: TECO

Ben,

I made a minor adjustment to the LOI re: exclusivity.

 << File: Midway TECO LOI june 1.doc >>

Policy states that any time we sign up to exclusivity we are supposed to get
it approved by Mark Metts, Tim Detmering and the CEO of the affected business
unit.  Seems a little silly in this case, but it can't hurt. (yes, I know we
didn't do it with the turbine stuff)

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000 08:19
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
01/25/2000 01:30 PM
To: 6202354@skytel.com, 6202354@skytel.com
cc:
Subject:

Here is the phone number for the kennel 281-449-3027.  Here's how you get
there.  Take JFK (South - away from the airport) accross Beltway 8 to
Aldine-Bender (next major intersection after the beltway).  Take a right on
Aldine-Bender and go to the 2nd street which is Milner.  There are no lights
at Milner and Aldine - you just have to watch for the road.  Go 1 block to
Renton.  Take a left on Renton and its the 2nd or 3rd house down.


Vince,

one of my colleagues here at Baylor is writing a book about "the business
of heaven" in which he interviews prominent business leaders.  Bob Darden
is his name and he's a former journalist and nice guy.  He would like to
contact Ken Lay about being one of his interviews.  Do you think this is
possible?  If so, could you give me an address/phone numbers that Bob might
use to contact Ken's secretary about setting up an interview?

If this is in any way "not ok" please just say so.

See ya,

John

>Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:35:03 -0600
>From: Robert Darden <rfd3@flash.net>
>Subject: Yo!
>X-Sender: "Robert Darden" <rfd3@pop.flash.net> (Unverified)
>To: J_Martin@baylor.edu
>Organization: The Door
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en]C-FLASHNET  (Win95; I)
>
>Hi John -- I enjoyed our meeting yesterday. This looks VERY promising.
>Meanwhile, as I mentioned at the table, I'm getting a little nervous
>about the book that is due June 1.
>One of the names on our "wish" list of interviewees for "The Business of
>Heaven" is Ken Lay at Enron.
>Would it be possible for you to give me a good address and phone number
>for Mr. Lay's office?
>And may I mention your name in the cover letter?
>I would be forever indebted. I might even buy the next lunch.
>Bob
>P.S. Thanks for sharing your concerns about church yesterday, too. I'm
>genuinely sorry things didn't work out better and feel more than a
>little embarrassed that I didn't work harder to make you guys feel more
>welcome and connected. On the other hand, please know that Mary and I
>will always love you and consider you both friends. I know you'll be
>happy at Lake Shore -- even as we miss you at 7th!
>
John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


Richard and Elizabeth,

At Christian's suggestion, I am sending a memo I prepared summarizing some of
the more exotic strategies used by our traders.  Christian has reviewed the
memorandum and believes that it will assist you both in preparing for our
Thursday meeting.  Between now and Thursday, Christian and I are going to
analyze the ISO tariff to determine if the tariff prohibits any of these
strategies.

Steve


Jeffrey,

My name is Molly Vaughan and I work along side your Forrester Account Manager David Kobierowski to cover the relationship between Forrester and Enron. I was hoping for an opportunity to have a 10-15 minute conversation with you to find out more about your specific role and business challenges that you may be facing.  Based on that conversation, I will be in a better position to direct you to some of the research we have that addresses those specific topics.  Let me know when a good time for me to call would be.

Link to Forrester's homepage  -->  http://www.forrester.com/Home/0,3257,1,FF.html

I look forward to working with you,

Best regards,

Molly Vaughan

Molly Vaughan | Forrester Research, Inc. | 400 Technology Sq. | Cambridge, MA 02139 | Direct: 617.613.6532 | email:mvaughan@forrester.com Corporate Web site: www.forrester.com


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Terry K. - Oncall

Date:		9/8/2001
Time:		7:00 AM - 8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Chris,

 We are going to redirect 3600 dths off of Texas Gas from CG&E to TCO
Pool.  600 dths/day will be delivered at Lebanon starting Thursday, February
24.
Please let me know if there are any questions or problems.

Brian


Dear Mr. Arnold:

I was referred to you by Ms. Eva Pao.  I am a second year MBA student at
Harvard Business School, writing to express interest in exploring potential
employment opportunities with Enron.  In particularly, I am interested in
derivatives trading.

I have attached my resume for your convenience. As you can see, my
professional experience has been in a variety of roles within financial
institutions and specifically, managing a currency trading-desk, before
starting my MBA.

I would appreciate an opportunity to meet with you or with one of your
colleagues, on a formal or informal basis, who might be in the Boston or NYC
areas in the next few months.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Gad Caspy

24 Peabody Terrace # 1801
Cambridge, MA 02138
H (617) 876 2306

Harvard Business School
MBA 2002

 - Gad_Caspy_Resume.doc


Things are getting better since TurboPark closed....

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 12/15/2000 09:46 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: today's schedule

You have to do the mother thing!  Are you having that 11:00 call?  I haven't
seen anything else.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	12/15/2000 08:23 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: today's schedule

Michael has some stuff at school today that I would like to attend.  I hope
to leave here around 130.

Kay


We will hold a UAF meeting for TW, NBPL, MGT, and Eott on Wednesday 2/27/2002.  Attached are several documents associated with that meeting. Please review the attached and bring the documents with you to the meeting.

   This is the agenda for the meeting.  Please note if you are being requested for an update.

   The recent results for TW UAF are in this file. While results were favorable the past few months, January 2002 has shown a significant gain.

	Jan 2002	178,000 MMBtu gain or .32%

	Well will have to address actions needed / taken to identify/rectify this gain.

  This report contains the EOTT results.  Note the page titles "EOTT gain (loss).  There was a gain in SW of .17% and results of 0.00% gain (loss) in the north.

The NBPL and MGT results are as follows:

	NBPL  A gain of .24%
	MGT   A gain of  .91%

 	I am providing this document as reminder of accountabilities and responsibilities.


Sounds fine to me.

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 01/10/2001 05:30:52 PM
To: "Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>, "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'"
<Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Closing Checklist and More

My vote would be to give George courtesy copies.

-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell, Carolyn
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 5:28 PM
To: 'Kay.Mann@enron.com'
Cc: Keffer, John
Subject: RE: Closing Checklist and More

Kay:

Of course - please feel free to come over and review the documents.
Everything is organized in preparation for the closing.  When you have a
minute, can you please advise of any comments to the membership certificates
and promissory notes circulated by e-mail from me 01-03-2001 with subject
reference "Closing Documents".  Once I have your comments, I can circulate
these documents to George, and I presume he will prepare the form of
promissory note desired by SEL.

In response to your question on delivering the assignment documents to
George, I am somewhat indifferent.  In some respects, I am inclined to
provide courtesy copies of the Assignment and Assumption Agreement and the
Bill of Sale to George, as I would want an opportunity to review these
documents if I were in his position.  On the other hand, he has not
indicated any desire to be in the loop on this aspect of the transaction,
and we do not necessarily want to invite additional comments.  I'm leaning
toward providing copies, but perhaps John has a stronger opinion.

Do you have any comments on the letter agreement for the 7EA turbine?  I
thought Ben wanted to get this out.  Let me know.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 5:16 PM
To: CCampbell@KSLAW.comjkeffer
Subject: Re: Closing Checklist

I expect to be out of town Wednesday and Thursday of next week (don't
worry, Ben can ALWAYS find me).  I would like to review the stuff before I
leave town.  Could I come over Tuesday and give it a look?

Do you guys think we need or should give Intergen the assignment docs and
the bills of sale?

Kay

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Dan,

Here is another example from SMUD.  FYI.

Thanks,

Kim
---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Ward/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001 08:16 AM
---------------------------

Calvin Miller <cmiller@smud.org> on 03/07/2001 04:56:37 PM
To: "Kim Ward (E-mail)" <kim.ward@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: SMUD Master Natural Gas Purchase Agreement

Kim-
Attached is a sample copy of the District's Natural Gas Purchase Agreement.

 <<Master Agreement Enron North America Corp March 200100.doc>>

Calvin Miller

 - Master Agreement Enron North America Corp March 200100.doc


Rod - What is our policy of accepting direct charges for corporate assistance?   Should this remain in corporate and be a part of the allocation?

Mike - Was any agreement made up front with Brindle to cover Kyle's expenses?   Was the request to travel made by Dave Odneal or yourself?

Morris A. Brassfield
Enron Transportation Services
Senior Director
Operations Support Services
Three Allen Center 3285
333 Clay Street
Houston, Texas 77002

713-646-7006  Business Phone
713-503-1409  Cell Phone

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lowry, Phil
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:03 PM
To:	Brassfield, Morris
Cc:	Nelson, Mike
Subject:	FW: Cost Center

Morris, can you look at this for us.  I kinda think that the Corp Allocation is the right place for this expense.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:00 PM
To:	Lowry, Phil
Subject:	FW: Cost Center

I appreciate Kyle's expertise and work, but do we always pay the direct expenses for Corp assistance?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ladish, Kim
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:42 PM
To:	Nelson, Mike
Subject:	FW: Cost Center

Mike:  In regard to Sharon's note below, please confirm the entities responsible for the cost of Kyle's trip.

Thank you,

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Killey, Sharon
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 11:20 AM
To:	Ladish, Kim
Subject:	Cost Center

Kyle Norosky who works in Enron Corp Business Controls, recently flew to Minneapolis with regard to security issues.  He has told me that his trip is to be charged to ETS/Northern Pipeline cost center or project code.

Please can you let me know what company number and code to charge this to.  The total cost of his trip was $1603.28

Many thanks.

Sharon Killey
Assistant to John Brindle
Business Controls
Tel:  713-345-4999
Fax: 713-646-8838


Hey, just workin and playin.  No planned vacations!  What's new with you?  How's work?  Things here have slowed down somewhat.  Hope that's not a bad sign for next year!  What have you been up to?  Haven't seen you about town at all.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"King, Brad" <Brad.King@conoco.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:57 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	RE: FW: Forward Warning

Hey stranger, whats going on?

-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Kim S (Houston) [mailto:Kim.Ward@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:04 PM
To: Angie Conner (E-mail); Ann Sutton (E-mail); Brad Fagan (E-mail);
Cathy Pocock (E-mail); Chris Todd (E-mail); Christopher Smith (E-mail);
Cindy Tarsi (E-mail); Dave Breish (E-mail); David Hutchens (E-mail);
David Payne (E-mail); Elizabeth Jordan (E-mail); Eric Strickland
(E-mail); Gayleen Barrett (E-mail); Ginger& Michael Brown (E-mail);
Harriet Turk (E-mail); Herman Green (E-mail); Slone, Jeanie; Jerry Ward
(E-mail); John Schilke (E-mail); Kathy Wright (E-mail); Karla Dailey
(E-mail); Linda Ward Elam (E-mail); Lisa Rosenberg (E-mail); Melissa
Reese (E-mail); Matt Mitten (E-mail); Mike & Rosalia Nolan (E-mail);
Mike Wardell (E-mail); Monica Padilla (E-mail); Natalie & Bret Boehmer
(E-mail); Sally McElroy (E-mail); Scott Connelly (E-mail); Shawn
McElmoyl (E-mail); Stanton Scott (E-mail); Susie Lejune (E-mail);
Theresa Cline (E-mail); Tina lovett (E-mail); Wayne Brown (E-mail); Wes
Kersey (E-mail); Yonnie Waller (E-mail); Olinger, Kimberly S.; Brewer,
Stacey J.; wenderachels@aol.com; Semperger, Cara; Fuller, Dave; Lucci,
Paul T.; Nemec, Gerald; Vann, Suzanne; Heintzelman, Pete; McDonald, Rob;
Vint, Peter; Foster, Chris H.; Mainzer, Elliot; Wente, Laura; Platter,
Phillip; sscastle@srpnet.com; Gerard, Camille; jana.morse@dynegy.com;
Cross, Edith EES; george.denos@neg.pge.com; brad.king@usa.conoco.com;
lawrence.pope@haliburton.com; Arnold, John; lisabarnwell1@yahoo.com;
kward1@houston.rr.com; Miller, Stephanie; tomd1966@yahoo.com;
antlulu2@aol.com; Kennedy, Susan L.; ilandman@verizon.net
Subject: FW: FW: Forward Warning

>  I received this email today from a very good friend of mine who has a
> lot of close friends from India.  This letter is to one of those close
> friends.  I don't know if I should pass it around but I want everyone
> I know to be aware.
>
Kim
> > >
> > >This is worth forwarding, just incase. . .
> > >
> >
> >=====================================================================
> ===
> > >===============================================
> > >
> > >PLEASE READ!
> > >Subject: Malls on 10/31
> > >
> > >Hey guys..I dont want to scare anyone..but its better safe than
> sorry,
> > >right?? This is not just a foward I recieved..Its from one of my
> > >colleages at JPMorgan. It's been sent around within the firm, I
> wanted
> > >to pass it on just in case.
> > >Hi All -
> > >I think you all know that I don't send out hoaxes and don't
> > >do the reactionary thing and send out anything that crosses my
> > >path.
> > >This one,  however, is a friend of a friend and I've given it
> > >enough credibility in my mind that I'm writing it up and sending it
> out
> > >to all of you.
> > >My friend's friend was dating a guy from Afghanistan up until a
> month
> > >ago.  She had a date with him around 9/6 and was stood up. She was
> > >understandably upset and went to his home to find it completely
> emptied.
> > >On 9/10, she received a letter from her boyfriend explaining that
> > >he
> > >wished he could tell her why he had left and that he was sorry it
> > >had to be like that.  The part worth mentioning is that he BEGGED
> her
> > >not to get on any commercial airlines on 9/11 and to not to go any
> malls
> > >on Halloween.
> > >As soon as everything happened on the 11th, she called the FBI and
> has
> > >since turned over the letter. This is not an email that I've
> received
> > >and decided to pass on.  This came from a phone conversation with a
> > >long-time friend of mine last night.
> > >I may be wrong, and I hope I am.  However, with one of his warnings
> > >being correct and devastating, I'm not willing to take the chance
> on the
> > >second and wanted to make sure that people I cared about had the
> same
> > >information that I did.
> > >Laura Katsis
> > >Implementation Specialist
> > >714/921-5424
> > >lkatsis@volt.com <mailto:lkatsis@volt.com>
> > >OpsVolt_Track@volt.com <mailto:OpsVolt_Track@volt.com>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------
> > >Reminder:  E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure.
> > >Do not use e-mail to send us confidential information
> > >such as credit card numbers, changes of address, PIN
> > >numbers, passwords, or other important information.
> > >Do not e-mail orders to buy or sell securities, transfer
> > >funds, or send time sensitive instructions. We will not
> > >accept such orders or instructions.  This e-mail is not
> > >an official trade confirmation for transactions executed
> > >for your account.  Your e-mail message is not private in
> > >that it is subject to review by the Firm, its officers,
> > >agents and employees.
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> >
> >*********************************************************************
> *
> > >This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate
> > >and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
> use of
> > >the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
> disclosure
> by
> > >others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient (or
> > >authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
> or
> > >reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
> and
> delete
> > >all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
> are
> not
> > >intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence
> a
> > >binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> > >affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
> not be
> > >relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise.
> > >Thank you.
> >
> >*********************************************************************
> *
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> >
> >
>


Return-Path: <jprenderg@yahoo.com>
Received: from  rly-yb01.mx.aol.com (rly-yb01.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.1]) by air-yb04.mail.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id MAILINYB49-0115100906; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:09:06 -0500
Received: from  web20707.mail.yahoo.com (web20707.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.226.180]) by rly-yb01.mx.aol.com (v83.18) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINYB17-0115100856; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:08:56 -0500
Message-ID: <20020115150850.29425.qmail@web20707.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [65.210.106.108] by web20707.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 07:08:50 PST
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 07:08:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Joe Prendergast <jprenderg@yahoo.com>
Subject: Hello
To: Vince Kaminski <vkaminski@aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)

Vince,

I just wanted to check in and see how you are doing.
I heard rumours that you and most of your group are
still there.  It's amazing the prominence this story
has had - this is probably the closest I'll ever feel
to a national news story (for better or worse).  Hope
things are OK.

Joe

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/28/2000
08:05 AM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 07/25/2000 09:47:18 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Australian Energy Risk Seminar

Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-ye05.mx.aol.com (rly-ye05.mail.aol.com [172.18.151.202])
by air-ye03.mx.aol.com (v75_b1.4) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 01:57:21 -0400
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
rly-ye05.mx.aol.com (v75.18) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 01:57:19 -0400
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id AAA19315 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 00:57:18 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/corp-1.05) with ESMTP id e6K5v6H20766 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 00:57:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from notes.ect.enron.com (ecthou_gt2.corp.enron.com [172.16.4.33])
by dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id AAA15008 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 00:57:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))
id 86256922.0020B01F ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 00:57:02 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT
From: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: Eric Takigawa <etakigawa@algorithmics.com>
cc: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>, vkaminski@aol.com
Message-ID: <86256922.0020AF11.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 00:56:57 -0500
Subject: Re: Australian Energy Risk Seminar
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: Unknown

Eric,

I have the presentation  on my laptop  and I
shall send you the presentation in a few days when
I get my back to my office in Houston.

I am currently using the system as a guest in our Sydney office.

The  person I mentioned is Anthony Dayao.

Vince Kaminski

Eric Takigawa <etakigawa@algorithmics.com> on 07/20/2000 12:15:09 AM

To:   vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Australian Energy Risk Seminar

Dear Dr. Kaminski:

My name is Eric Takigawa of Algorithmics Japan, and I spoke with you on the
last day of the seminar.

I would be pleased to receive a copy of your presentation with the promise
of non-circulating the material.

I have been in communication with Mr. Jonath Whitehead and will be meeting
Mr. Joe Hirl in early August.  You mentioned another individual at Enron
Japan - Antonio Dai(?) but couldn't recall the proper spelling of his name
and would like the opportunity to meet with him.

There is a tremendous opportunity for Enron in Japan and the conditions are
just right.

Kind regards,

Eric


Steve, Diomedes is going to jump all over me for even sending the ESA memo to
Metts.  I told him that this message affects more than us and he thinks he
has free reign within his region.  I am vacillating about whether to include
the paragraph I put in  bold, but I do want everyone to know just how
different this is from the sale of one asset.  The implications are much
broader and we don't want to come off looking dishonest to our own people.
And believe me, the rumors are out there.  I just don't want to make it worse
instead of better and that is my principle concern.  In terms of the market
finding out, we always say that our assets are always for sale so I don't
think we are giving away anything new.

I have a draft of the proposed Office of the Chairman letter, (a DC version
and a DH version) but need the Skilling input on what our international
strategy  is.  I am caught here between a rock (DC) and a hard place (DH) and
I really feel like we need the direction.  Both of them have been calling
Skilling and we need to take his temperature.  If the message it the one
Diomedes thinks it is, we definitely will not want to issue an all employee
memo.  We would be telling about half the international people that there is
no future for them.

Whew!  That's it for now.  My mission tomorrow is getting every possible
question written for Jim for e-speak so he doesn't say something he should
not.


H-man - If you want to hear the bull story here it is.  Cera loves this market and is preaching among other things Jun to Apr generation demand is going to be up 5B/d.  Just click on the link below.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	webmaster@cera.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-webmaster+40cera+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, May 16, 2001 9:00 PM
To:	insights@cera.com
Subject:	STRONG SPRING INJECTIONS BRING PRICES DOWN - CERA Monthly Briefing

Title: Monthly Gas Briefing: A Late Spring Break
URL: http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2392

Year-over-year storage numbers have benefited from record April injections. Continued fuel switching, a weakened economy, and favorable weather have contributed to a softening market, so that natural gas has been pricing below distillate. It is still too early, however, to declare summer over, and CERA believes that prices will remain high enough to keep end users off gas.

* Under normal weather, April injections have put inventories on pace to reach 2,820 Bcf by the end of October, 121 Bcf above last October.

* As summer power demand ramps up, CERA expects prices to move upward in June, averaging $4.90 for the month.

* The market remains vulnerable to price volatility, as summer power load increases could cause significant price run-ups.

**end**

E-mail Category: Monthly Briefing
CERA Knowledge Area(s): North American Gas,

***********************************************************************

CERA's Spring 2001 Roundtable event dates and agendas are now available
at http://www20.cera.com/event

***********************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www20.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Hey there Mike - Jeff spoke to Trevor yesterday about the EEA contract.  He may give you a ring today as well.

Please let me know if you have any immediate questions.

Talk to you soon,

Lisa

Lisa Jacobson
Enron
Manager, Environmental Strategies
1775 Eye Street, NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006

Phone: +(202) 466-9176
Fax: +(202) 331-4717


Frontera option price changed from $17.80 to $17.804


T U E S D A Y   E X T R E M E   M A R K E T S
A complimentary service from INO.com ( http://www.ino.com/ )

Tuesday: The CRB Index is down 0.02 points to 214.60. The
US Dollar Index climbed 0.69 points to 116.08.

The Dow Industrials fell 51.66 points, at 10883.51, while
the S&P 500 trended lower by 2.33 points, last seen at 1261.18. The
Nasdaq Composite climbed 25.20 points to 2198.77.

FREE 20 PAGE GUIDE, THE "Scientific Trader" - learn to predict market!!!
   http://www.ino.com/specials/tradersnet/reversal.html
_____________________________________________________________________

PUT $300 MILLION ON YOUR SIDE!
_____________________________________________________________________

Low-Priced Course Best Way Ever To Learn The Turtle Secrets
http://store.ino.com/private/1E78A/TWTS-TurtleSecrets

Dear Trader:

Now you can learn the most powerful, valuable and profitable
trading method EVER!

. . . Now Revealed In NEW Trading Course
For Just A Small, No-Risk Investment

World Famous "Turtle" Commodity Trading Method
. . . Now Available To You

On Video And In Clear Trading Lessons
In The Privacy Of Your Home
. . . At A VERY Affordable Low, Low Price!!

Fifteen years ago, one futures trader stunned the entire trading
world as he methodically turned $400 into over $200,000,000
trading futures. In 1983, he personally taught his trading
strategies and systems to 14 people he nicknamed "The Turtles."

In the next five years, the Turtles earned some $35,000,000 as
their percent of profits from the $175,000,000 profit they made
for their teacher (who bankrolled their trading)!

Yes, those zeroes are correct.

As a group, the "Turtles" have been trading now for over 14 years
and currently manage $2,000,000,000 (2 BILLION dollars) given to
them from people and institutions all over the world. Estimated
profits for the 16 months ending this past April are over
$300,000,000 (that's 300 million dollars actual, documented
profits!)

Even now - 14 years later - five of the world's top 10 futures
money managers are Turtle traders!

Now You Can Learn The "Turtle" Trading System And Strategy
In An Exciting Personal Trading Course - In Your Living Room

READ OUR VALUABLE 16 PAGE
ONLINE BROCHURE NOW BY VISITING:

http://store.ino.com/private/1E78A/TWTS-TurtleSecrets

Turtle Trading
System Revealed!

Order Toll Free 800-538-7424 - 410-867-7424

All claims on third-party products are made by the publisher
and not by INO.com. All Products Guaranteed.

_____________________________________________________________________

E X T R E M E   M A R K E T   C O M M E N T A R Y
_____________________________________________________________________

The stock market closed mixed today. June Nasdaq prices are still
within striking distance of the April high of 1995. Sideways trading
the past week has negated a fledgling four-week-old uptrend on the
daily bar chart. Bulls still have some heavy lifting to do and their
next upside objective is resistance at the key 2,000 area. First
support is seen at the 1,732 area. June S&P 500 futures closed firmer
today. Prices have leveled off the past week, after rallying solidly
off the early-April low. Technically, bulls still need to push prices
above the 1285 resistance area. My bias is still that any recovery in
the stock market and the stock indexes won't be dramatic, but a
slower grind higher, with fits and starts. First resistance is seen
at 1285.00. First support is seen at 1206.00.

LIVESTOCK: June live cattle closed 2 cents higher at 71.12. Prices
closed at the session low and managed to fill an upside gap on the
daily bar chart that was created in early trading. The market saw
another upside corrective bounce earlier today, after punching to a
fresh 6.5-month low last Friday. The bears are in control of the
market. Prices are still trading below an accelerating two-month-old
downtrend line on the daily bar chart. The market is still a bit
short-term oversold, and I would not be surprised to see more of an
upside correction this week. Next support, basis June, is seen at
$71.00. First resistance now comes in at the $72.00 level.

August feeder cattle closed up 3 cents today at $88.25. Prices closed
at the session low today. Range-bound trade continues. As this market
neared the bottom end of the recent trading range, which is around
$87.50, the market again took an upside bias. Look for more choppy
trading between $89 and $87.50. If prices can break out of that
aforementioned range, the direction of the breakout will likely be
the direction of the next significant trend. Next resistance is seen
at $88.70-- today's high. First support is seen at $88.00.

June lean hogs closed $0.15 higher today, at $67.50. Prices are still
showing consolidation at lower levels, after the sell off last week.
Hogs are still a bit overdone on the downside, on a short-term basis,
so some more corrective upside consolidation would not surprise me.
Still, the bears have the strong momentum on their side at present.
Next support lies at $66.25. First resistance is located at the 68.15
level--today's high.

GRAINS: July corn futures closed off 3 cents at $2.05 today. Crop
progress reports out Monday evening showing very good planting
progress in the U.S. weighed on the corn market today. There is just
not much bullish fundamental news in the corn market right now. The
weak wheat market is also weighing on corn. On Monday, respected Iowa
State University Climatologist Elwynn Taylor predicted record yields
for the Corn Belt this year. It would not surprise me to see the
commodity funds make another significant downside assault on the corn
and bean markets in the near term. Next support is now seen at $2.00.
Next resistance is seen at the $2.07 1/2 level--today's high.

July soybeans closed 2 3/4 cents higher at $4.40 1/2 today. Prices
are consolidating the recent gains, but bulls still by no means have
any significant momentum. Fundamentally, there is not much in the way
of good news for bulls right now. I would not be surprised to see the
commodity funds make another downside push in beans in the near term.
This market is still in technical trouble and it's going to take a
significant weather scare this spring or summer to force prices
solidly higher. First resistance is seen at the $4.45 area and then
$4.50. First support is seen at $4.35 and then at $4.30.

July soybean meal closed off $1.10 at $155.70 today. Prices this week
are showing a corrective pullback after they pushed to a fresh
eight-week high last Friday. Recent price action is still encouraging
to the bulls and is a sign the lows are in place in the meal market.
Next resistance comes in at the $158.50 area. First support is seen
at $154.00.

July bean oil closed 22 points higher at 15.09 cents today. Prices
saw a corrective bounce today after dropping to a new contract low of
14.76 cents on Monday. This market is technically much weaker than
beans or meal, and is still a bit overdone on the downside, on a
short-term basis. I would be surprised if there is much downside left
in oil. Next resistance comes in at 15.25 cents. Next support is seen
at the contract low of 14.76 cents.

July Chicago wheat closed 2 1/2 cents lower at $2.66 3/4 today.
Prices poked to a new contract low of $2.65. More rain in the Plains
has cast a bearish pall over the market. With the wheat crop behind
schedule anyway, the recent rains could allow the crop to make some
good improvement. Bears are in full command. Just last week, prices
pushed to a fresh six-week high. Serious technical damage has
occurred the past few sessions. First support lies at the contract
low of $2.65. Next resistance is seen at $2.70. This market is
short-term oversold and I suspect we'll see a corrective bounce soon.

SOFTS: July N.Y. sugar closed 18 points higher at 9.10 cents today.
We could see a bull flag starting to form in sugar, on the daily bar
chart. This many times occurs as prices consolidate steep gains. A
three-month high was scored in July sugar late last week. The bulls
have good momentum and a steep and accelerating five-week-old uptrend
line is still in place on the daily bar chart. Next resistance now
comes in at 9.25 cents. First support is now seen at 8.80 cents.

July N.Y. coffee closed 15 points higher at 68.90 cents today. Prices
pushed to another fresh two-month high today as the bulls continue to
gain momentum. This recent move is the most significant showing by
the bulls since mid-January. The fact that prices have not sold off
sharply the past three sessions is encouraging for the bulls,
too--given recent price history. Still, the bears could be setting a
trap, like they did in early January. If bulls can push prices above
70 cents and then see follow-through strength, bears will begin to
think this uptrend is sustainable. First resistance comes in at 70
cents. First support is seen 65.00 cents.

July N.Y. cocoa closed $55 higher today, at $1,044. Today's strong
gap-higher trade on the daily bar chart put the bulls back on a level
playing field with the bears in a hurry. Prices pushed above and
negated a 2.5-month-old downtrend line on the daily bar chart. Next
resistance comes in at $1,050 and then $1,060. First support is now
seen at today's low of $1,001.

July cotton closed 99 points lower at 45.44 cents today. Cotton is in
a strong bear market, and a new contract low was scored just today,
at 45.40 cents. Right now, any rebounds are likely to be just selling
opportunities for the bears. But, my bias is still that we are not
that far from a bottoming process. Next support lies at 45.00 cents.
First resistance is seen around 48.00 cents. Would-be bottom-pickers
should beware. Bulls need to watch for some "basing" action, which
may be beginning.

July orange juice futures closed 45 points lower today, at 76.95
cents. Prices late last week probed into an important gap area on the
daily bar chart, which begins at 77.85 cents, but did not fill that
gap on the upside. Bears rule and the market is still technically
weak. However, if the aforementioned gap can be filled on the upside,
that's an important first step for the bulls in turning the market
around. That gap will be filled if prices move above 78.55 cents,
which is first resistance. Next support comes in at 76.00 cents.

July lumber futures closed $2.60 lower at $308.40 today. Prices just
Monday hit yet a new for-the-move high, at $313.20, as the bull
market roars on. Today's price action is just some healthy
consolidation in a bull market. Expect more volatility, however, as
is typical for this market. The next upside objective for the bulls
is the $315.00 area. First support is seen at the $300.00 area. This
market is still short-term overbought, technically, and I would not
be surprised to see a decent downside correction soon.

METALS: June COMEX gold closed down $1.00 today, at $265.50. Prices
late last week pushed to a new seven-week high. Despite recent choppy
trading, this market is still trending up from its early-April low.
But bulls need to see some solid upside movement soon to keep what
momentum they have recently gained. But the fact that prices have not
sold way off after the rally is encouraging to the bulls. Next
resistance is located at $268. First support is seen at $264.00.

July silver closed up $0.008 today, at $4.335 an ounce. Prices are
not that far above the contract low. Still, prices are chopping at
lower levels. This suggests a "basing" action that many markets need
to change the trend from down, to sideways, to eventually up. Next
support is seen at $4.30. First resistance is seen at $4.41. Bears
still have the advantage.

July N.Y. copper closed 1.80 cents lower today, at 76.85 cents. Stock
market weakness helped drive this market lower today. Prices are
still attempting to build a base and recover from the early-April
low. My bias is still that the downside is limited for copper. The
stock market and the U.S. economy will have to be healthy before the
bulls can really get something going in copper, however. Next
resistance is seen at 78.00 cents. Next support is seen at 76.00
cents.

ENERGIES: July crude closed $0.19 lower at $28.35 today. Bulls and
bears are at a stand-off and will duke it out over the near term.
Expect more choppy trading. Next support is seen at 28.00. Next
resistance lies at $29.50.

July heating oil closed 30 points higher today, at .7551. Bulls still
have the slight edge, but look for more choppy trading in the near
future. Next support is seen at 73.00 cents. Next resistance is seen
at 77.50 cents.

July unleaded gasoline closed 128 points lower at .9898 today. Prices
scored a new contract high just Monday, and saw follow-through
selling today. That confirms a key reversal in this market. But given
the recent volatility in unleaded, I am not placing a lot of emphasis
on this key reversal. Bulls are still in command as peak driving
season nears. Top-pickers beware! Next resistance is seen at $1.03.
First support is seen at $.9600.

July natural gas closed 3.6 cents higher at $4.35 today. Today was
just an upside correction in a steep downtrend. Prices hit a fresh
five-and-one-half-month low Monday. Next support is seen at $4.25 and
first resistance is now at $4.50. This market is still short-term
oversold, technically.

FINANCIALS, CURRENCIES: The June Euro currency closed 62 points lower
at .8828 today. Bears have the decided edge again as bulls have lost
all the momentum they had gained in mid-April. My bias is still that
there is not much downside left in the Euro. Look for more choppy
action in the near term. Bulls will again gain good momentum if they
can push prices above the .9075 area. Next support is now seen at
.8800. Next resistance is seen at .9000.

The June Japanese yen closed 5 points lower at .8279 today. Prices
pushed to a fresh six-week high last Friday, but bears are still in
control. Bulls are hoping for some "basing" activity at lower levels,
and that may be occurring, although it's too early to tell. Next
support now lies at the .8100 level. First resistance is seen at the
.8326 level.

The June Swiss franc closed 36 points lower today, at .5739. Bears
are in command. Still, my bias is that prices won't deteriorate much
more. Next support is seen at the .5700 level. First resistance comes
in at the .5830 level.

The June Australian dollar futures closed 37 points lower at .5150
today. Prices pushed to a fresh two-month high late last week and are
consolidating a bit this week. The bulls still have the advantage as
a five-week-old uptrend line is in place on the daily bar chart. My
bias is that the lows are in place. First resistance is now seen at
.5250. First support is now seen at .5100.

The June Canadian dollar closed 14 points lower today, at .6464.
Prices sold off some more today after the key reversal down on the
daily bar chart that was scored Monday. Bulls had good momentum, but
have lost some the past two sessions. The key reversal does not
indicate prices are headed back toward the lows seen a few weeks ago.
What it does suggest is a decent downside correction to the recent
gains will occur over the near term. This currency had been near
recent historic lows and I do not think there is much more downside.
Next resistance is seen at the .6548 level. First support is seen at
the .6450 level.

The June British pound closed 126 points lower at 1.4244. Trading
continues choppy at lower levels. This currency was not that far
above recent historic lows and I do not think there is much more
downside in the sterling. One could argue that price action the past
few weeks has been a "basing" before prices eventually turn north. A
move above the 1.4500 level would be considered a bullish "upside
breakout" from the recent congestion area. Next support is now seen
at the 1.4200 level. Next resistance comes in at the 1.4400 level.

The June U.S. dollar index closed 75 points higher at 116.24 today.
Bulls are regaining momentum. The recent double-top reversal on the
daily bar chart still favors the bears longer-term. Next resistance
lies at the 116.50 level. First support is seen at the 114.50 area.
My bias is still that a near-term top is in place in the dollar
index.

June U.S. T-bonds closed 17/32 lower today at 101 21/32. Prices
scored a bearish "outside day" down on the daily bar chart today,
whereby the high was higher and the low was lower than the previous
session's trading range, with a lower close. Bulls need to show some
resolve soon, after pushing prices well off the lows scored in late
April. A steep six-week-old downtrend line was penetrated on the
upside last week and negated. Also, a minor double-bottom reversal
has occurred on the daily bar chart. Next resistance is seen at 103
9/32. First support is seen at 101 even.

Daily Extreme Commentary is brought to you by GLOBALcharts,
INO.com's end-of-day charting software for Futures, Futures
Options and Optionable Stocks. http://www.globalcharts.com
Search the INO Store  - http://store.ino.com/
_____________________________________________________________________

T O P   N E W S
_____________________________________________________________________

STOCKS

Japan Stocks Review: Nikkei down 1.7%, banks battered
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25266
Add 1: US Equities Review: Mixed in quiet trade; Cisco boosts Nasdaq
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25264
UK Stocks Review: FTSE-100 slightly higher in lackluster session
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25272

FOREX

US FX Review: Dollar weathers poor domestic productivity data
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25268
Asia FX Review: Yen weakens on fall in Japan stocks
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25265
Europe FX Review: Poor data fails to undermine dollar
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25267

CREDIT

US Credit Review: Bond down 24/32, underperforming 2-year
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25263
Europe Credit Review: Curve unmoved; mkt awaits central banks
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25269
Japan Credit Review: June up on firm 10-year cash bonds
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25271

COMMODITIES

US Futures Summary: Cotton, copper, corn crumble; cocoa climbs
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25270

EXCHANGES

PCX To Trade KPMG
 and Corrections to Lafarge and Catapult
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=23560
Daily Price Limit Change For Value Line Futures
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=23559

____________________________________________________________________________

E X T R E M E   F U T U R E S
____________________________________________________________________________

Updated every 10 minutes around the clock.
More at http://quotes.ino.com/analysis/extremes/futures/

WINNERS

BDK1   Oriented Strand Board May 2001             211.00     16.00  +8.21
CCN1   Cocoa Jul 2001                               1044        56  +5.66
XWK1   Wheat May 2001                            269 1/4     9 3/4  +3.76
RRK1   Rough Rice May 2001                         5.680     0.140  +2.53
PBK1   Frozen Pork Bellies May 2001               80.300     1.750  +2.23
ZM1    U.S. Treasury 6% Bond Jun 2001          103 184/256    2 2/32  +2.03
NDM1   NASDAQ 100 Index Jun 2001                 1940.00     37.00  +1.94
SBN1   Sugar #11 World Jul 2001                     9.10      0.15  +1.68
BOK1   Soybean Oil May 2001                        14.84      0.24  +1.64
DBK1   Butter May 2001                           189.000     3.000  +1.61

LOSERS

NTM1   Nikkei 300 Jun 2001                         283.8      -7.7  -2.64
HGN1   Copper Jul 2001                            0.7685   -0.0180  -2.29
ON1    Oats Jul 2001                                 112    -2 1/2  -2.18
CTN1   Cotton Jul 2001                             45.44     -0.98  -2.11
LBX1   Random Length Lumber Nov 2001              289.00     -5.70  -1.95
HUM1   New York Harbor Unleaded Gasoline Jun 20    1.0444   -0.0201  -1.89
CLM1   Light Sweet Crude Oil Jun 2001              27.39     -0.47  -1.69
CU1    Corn Sep 2001                             212 3/4    -3 1/4  -1.50
PNU1   Propane Sep 2001                           0.5275   -0.0075  -1.42
PLV1   Platinum Oct 2001                           599.8        -8  -1.32
____________________________________________________________________________

E X T R E M E   S T O C K S
____________________________________________________________________________

Updated every 10 minutes around the clock.
More at http://quotes.ino.com/analysis/extremes/stocks/

WINNERS

CBTE   COMMONWEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGIES                 7.04      3.33  +86.49
HELE   HELEN OF TROY LTD                            8.65      2.16  +33.91
AVN    AVANIR PHARMACEUTICALS'A'                    5.40      1.22  +29.19
GNSS   GENESIS MICROCHIP                           18.99      3.70  +24.42
TREE   LENDINGTREE INC                              6.09      1.08  +22.04
NXTV   NEXT LEVEL COMMUNICATION                     8.65      1.43  +19.62
ISSX   INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS INC               59.87      8.81  +17.23
MTH    MERITAGE CORP                               52.05      7.64  +17.20
MM     MUTUAL RISK MANAGEMENT                       8.10      1.14  +16.38
CATZ   Computer Access Tech                         5.80      0.82  +16.24

LOSERS

INOD   INNODATA CORP                                6.57     -2.40  -26.73
AMCV   AMER CLASSIC VOYAGES                         6.95     -2.48  -26.72
TRK    SPEEDWAY MOTORSPORTS                        22.80     -5.67  -19.97
AMCVP  AMCV CAP TR I                               19.00     -4.50  -19.57
CKCM   CLICK COMMERCE                              14.47     -3.37  -19.40
MAXC   MAXCO INC                                    7.50     -1.43  -19.07
NEOL   NEOPHARM INC                                22.26     -4.03  -15.68
CANI   CARREKER CORP                               17.96     -3.27  -15.41
VITL   VITAL SIGNS                                 35.05     -6.12  -14.85
MCHM   MACROCHEM CORP                               8.01     -1.25  -13.41

FREE MANAGED FUTURES & IRA RETIREMENT KIT
http://www.ino.com/specials/icm/
_____________________________________________________________________

T H A N K   Y O U
_____________________________________________________________________

Thank you for subscribing to the Extreme Markets Daily Digest from INO.com
( http://www.ino.com/ ). If you want to subscribe to our other email
services, or would like to modify your profile please visit
http://www.ino.com/email/.

To subscribe a friend, visit:
  http://www.ino.com/email/

To unsubscribe, visit:
  http://www.ino.com/email/remove/?email=mike.grigsby@enron.com&list=evening

--
Copyright 1998-2001 INO.com. All Rights Reserved.


you are long at np, because i did not put a imbalance deal in.  I figured you
were going to sell that 10 mws of np length off to a sc on a realtime basis.
So, please take care of this


(See attached file: HPLN0210.xls)                       (See attached file:
HPLN0213.xls)

 - HPLN0210.xls
 - HPLN0213.xls


Jay

Find enclosed a four page note on the interest rate
and foreign exchange hedging process - the underlying
philosophy, methodology, issues and system
requirements. Hopefully this should be helpful to all
involved.

Harry

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
 - Financial Risk White Paper.doc


Daren,

FYI.

Bob


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Accounting system review

Date:		5/3/2001
Time:		2:30 PM - 3:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Trade Count, by 3:30 pm, for last 30 days:

TRADE DATE	TRADE CNT
10/1/2001	5207
10/2/2001	5354
10/3/2001	5930
10/4/2001	6455
10/5/2001	5846
10/6/2001	17
10/7/2001	52
10/8/2001	5092
10/9/2001	5252
10/10/2001	6200
10/11/2001	5922
10/12/2001	6095
10/13/2001	16
10/14/2001	19
10/15/2001	5386
10/16/2001	7086
10/17/2001	7405
10/18/2001	7610
10/19/2001	7978
10/20/2001	4
10/21/2001	34
10/22/2001	7883
10/23/2001	8500
10/24/2001	7906
10/25/2001	8359
10/26/2001	6776
10/27/2001	11
10/28/2001	7
10/29/2001	7060
10/30/2001	5713
10/31/2001	7091

Same data by counterparty, also showing percentage today versus last-two-week average, is in the enclosed spreadsheet.


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042823.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 06/07/2001
06:04 PM ---------------------------

eserver@enron.com on 05/30/2001 02:15:36 PM
To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - May - Env Strat

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Michael Terraso
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: May - Env Strat
Report Total: $1,668.88
Amount Due Employee: $1,668.88

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


per your request


FYI.  Please see note chain. Legislative effort differs considerably from this.  Note on that bill and today's Leg events to follow.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Huhman, Steve [mailto:steve.huhman@mirant.com]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:00 PM
To: 'Dan Douglass'; ARM; Vicki Sandler; Tamara Johnson; Mara, Susan;
Huhman, Steve; Roger Pelote; Rob Nichol; Randy Hickok; Nam Nguyen; Jim
Crossen; Dasovich, Jeff; Janie Mollon; Jack Pigott; Greg Blue; George
Vaughn; Gary Ackerman; Ed Cazalet; Denice Cazalet Purdum; Curtis Kebler;
Curt Hatton; Corby Gardiner; Charles Miessner; Carolyn Baker; Bill Ross;
Karen Shea; Max Bulk
Subject: RE: CRITICAL!! IMMEDIATE REVIEW NEEDED

If Legal analysis indicates that we can make a strong case for either
hearings, or a change of date, Mirant would be a supporter. Due to time
constraints, we may not be available to contribute to strategy discussions
in the next day or two, however. If the group comes up with an action that
it believes makes good sense, Mirant will participate. - - Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:23 PM
To: ARM; Vicki Sandler; Tamara Johnson; Sue Mara; Steve Huhman; Roger
Pelote; Rob Nichol; Randy Hickok; Nam Nguyen; Jim Crossen; Jeff Dasovich;
Janie Mollon; Jack Pigott; Greg Blue; George Vaughn; Gary Ackerman; Ed
Cazalet; Denice Cazalet Purdum; Curtis Kebler; Curt Hatton; Corby Gardiner;
Charles Miessner; Carolyn Baker; Bill Ross; Karen Shea; Max Bulk
Subject: CRITICAL!! IMMEDIATE REVIEW NEEDED

THE COMMISSION HAS ISSUED A REVISED DRAFT OF THE BARNETT DECISION TODAY
WHICH RETROACTIVELY SUSPENDS DIRECT ACCESS TO JULY 1.

The cover letter states as follows:

"This version differs from the draft mailed on August 15, 2001 in several
ways. First, the effective date of the suspension has been changed from
September 1, 2001 to July 1, 2001 (as proposed in the draft mailed June 15,
2001). Second, the draft decision clarifies that customers who have executed
direct access contracts prior to July 1, 2001 may continue to receive power
from electric service providers for the initial term of the contracts.
Several other editorial and explanatory changes have also been made.

Assembly Bill No. 1 from the First Extraordinary Session (AB1X) requires
that direct access be suspended until the Department of Water Resources no
longer supplies power to the customers of the three largest regulated
electricity companies. It directs that the Commission determine the
effective date of the suspension. In order to reduce the possibility of harm
to customers and to resolve potential conflict, parties should comment on:
(1) whether AB1X suspends the entire direct access program, including all
transactions under that program, (2) how the Commission can comply with AB1X
if it exempts written contracts for direct access executed before July 1,
2001 from the suspension, and (3) whether July 1, 2001 is an appropriate
date for the suspension......Comments on the draft decision are permitted.
Those comments are to be electronically served on the service list (for
those who have electronic addresses) no later than 10:00 a.m. on September
4, 2001, and shall be filed with the Commission by 5:00 p.m. on that date."

The specific wording in the Decision is:

"The Legislature has directed this Commission to suspend direct access until
DWR no longer procures power for the retail end-users, and we find it should
be suspended effective July 1, 2001.  The Legislative direction is clear;
and the suspension should apply to SCE, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
(PG&E), and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E).  In the interest of
providing cost stability for current direct access customers, written
contracts for direct access signed before July 1, 2001 are exempt from the
suspension for the initial term of the contracts."

It also provides that:

"In comments on the draft decision, several parties questioned the need for
the Commission to implement the legislative suspension of direct access as
soon as July 1, 2001.  By the draft decision mailed for comment to the
parties on June 15, 2001, market participants were provided notice that
direct access would be suspended as of July 1, 2001.  The Commission
postponed its consideration of the draft decision.  However, we do not
change the effective date of the suspension.  The underlying legislation was
introduced on January 3, 2001, enrolled and sent to the Governor on February
1, 2001, and signed by the Governor the same day.  Market participants have
now had eight months since then to prepare for this event.  We do not wish
to reward customers who have switched to direct access since July 1, 2001 in
the hope that we would change the effective date of the suspension when this
switch could disadvantage customers who continue to receive bundled service
from the utility."

The decision also states that no parties have raised any factual issues
which would justify hearings, which presumably, although not explicitly,
disposes of the joint AReM/WPTF filing.  I presume we will want to file in
strong opposition.  Suggestions on strategy?  It might be a good idea to
have a conference call on this and get started immediately with raising a
movement to counter this.

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com <mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com>


Rod,
how was the holiday. i hope not as exhausting as mine.
i assume that Cindy Olsen has yet to get you an answer.  Enron may get a
little bump in anticipation of a positive earnings release.  This may give
us an opportunity to create some sort of hedge/collar.  Let me know as soon
as you find out.
Erik

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Solis, Erik
> Sent:	Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:41 PM
> To:	'rod.hayslett@enron.com'
> Subject:	quick question - confidential
>
> rod,
> on 1/1/02 you show to acquire a vested release of 50,000 shares at 1.50
> (1/1/98 grant date plan PU98).  this looks much the same as the 50,000
> restricted shares that were redeemed on 1/11/01. could you give me an idea
> of what your expectations as to what will transpire.  at first glance, i
> would think that you would get 50k shares with a basis of 1.50 less taxes
> due (net 30,000 shares). This is what happened this past year with the two
> releases of 1168 & 3604 shares.  I am just wondering about the redemption
> and/or cancellation probabilities of this upcoming release.
>
> let me know.
> Erik

Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions: Please
do not transmit orders and/or instructions regarding your
UBS PaineWebber account(s) by e-mail. Orders and/or instructions
transmitted by e-mail will not be accepted by UBS PaineWebber and
UBS PaineWebber will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.  Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
UBS PaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and review the content of
all e-mail communications sent and/or received by its employees.


Dear Tony,

Please be advised that the cooldown operation itself is going well.
We lost abt 12 hrs during our purge operation of tks 2 and 3 due to
the requirement of the CO2 content in the return gas. The limit was
abt 50 ppm.  The reason for this is that the plant is normally
sending the returngas back to the process and to avoid any icing in
the system.

Commenced purging tk 2 and 3  :11th 0240
Completed    :12th 0250  (CO2 90 ppm, allowed to
start cooldown)
Commenced cooldown tk 3 and 4 :     0300

Now, 1800lt 12/3, tks 3 and 4 is down to - 79 and -81 C respectively
and we expecting to be finish with the cooldown itself within 5 hrs.
Then cooling down the cargo line ( 1hr ), loading (2 hrs), paper work
and dept (2 hrs).  The remaining tks will be cooled down during the
voy. to Bahrain.

Etd 13th 0400lt
Eta Bahrain 14th 1700lt

Re yr travelling to Muscat/Sur

Have advised the agent, Towell Barwil, that you are arriving
Muscat/Sur in connection with the first loading. Kindly advice the
Agent (PIC Mr. Irwin Peiris), abt. yr travelling details and they
will arrange for transport and hotel in Sur.

Reverting.

Best regards

Capt Kjell Kvammen    LNG/C "Hoegh Galleon"

Brgds Oe. Hansen
Master

E-mail: master.gall@hoegh.no
Teleph: Inmarsat tel.no. 330853910
Fax   : Inmarsat fax no. 330853913
Telex : Inmarsat B telex no.330853915
Telex : Inmarsat C telex no.430853910 (24hrs.wa