A scathing AP article against Governor Davis concerning his inaction with the
California crisis. Davis is facing two issues. Sign the current rollback bill
that is going through the legislature and upset the energy industry, or veto
the bill and have many voters upset at him. Governor Davis is aware of the
upcoming elections for members in his party, as well as the 2002 governor
election and knows that his decision may cost himself and other members of
his party election wins. Also, there is now talks that during August 21st PUC
meeting the governor will suggest rate rollback for San Diego  to July 1998
rates. This is a complete 180 degree turn from his August 3rd PUC meeting
where he said he would steer clear of rate rollbacks or freezes and push for
only a rebate.

Attached is a personal interest type story providing the general publics view
of the whole California power situation.


Here's an outline.

Please forward to Mike Day.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2001
05:19 PM ---------------------------

"Michael SCHILMOELLER" <Michael_Schilmoeller@pgn.com> on 04/05/2001 02:06:54
PM
To: vkamins@enron.com, Stinson_Gibner@pgn.com, Vince_J_Kaminski@pgn.com
cc: Vasant_Shanbhogue@pgn.com
Subject: Henwood Report

Tanya has been very helpful recently in helping us to understand the Enron
VAR modeling system.  So when I received this Henwood report yesterday, I
immediately thought that this was an opportunity to reciprocate.  (I have
been hoping to develop some software tools that I think you could use, but
... you know the drill.)  Although there should be no problem from Henwood's
standpoint with sharing this document with you, I would prefer that you not
pass it around outside of Research.

The PGE Generation & Engineering Services department paid for our one-year
subscription to Henwood's off-the-shelf market forecast.  They wanted a
broader perspective of the market, given their interest in building power
plants.  I was not surprised to see, however, that Henwood's 20-year price
forecast almost lies directly on top of the one that I prepare for PGE.
Henwood is slightly more bullish on gas prices and seems to be assuming
greater efficiencies of new generation.  The implied market heatrate,
however, effectively nets out much of the gas price assumption, and it
matches our own projections very well.

Be sure to save this and open it outside Lotus Notes or whatever mail system
you have now.  It is rather large and could lock up your mail.

Are you aware of any subscriptions or contracts that Enron has with Henwood?
Does London still use their model?  I will be attending a Henwood
presentation on this report tomorrow in Seattle.  Are you interested in what
I bring back?

Best Regards,
M

 - Henwood.pdf


Mark, thanks for your advice during our phone discussion on Monday. That was
the feedback I was looking for. I was concerned that in Australia we would be
revisiting issues that had already been resolved elsewhere.

We are now progressing to wrap up the legal issues in line with our scheduled
implemenation date of April 1. I'll keep you posted of developments .


Hello everyone:

A meeting has been scheduled between the addressees for Wednesday,
August 16th at 4:00PM in EB1938.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Regards,

Shirley


We got one wood duck out of the Moccasin hole.  We stayed till about 9:30.  We did see 5 or 6 big ducks pass way over the top of the hole, but nothing came close.

There was a lot of shooting to the east of us throughout the morning, but I wasn't sure if it was you or someone else.

kh


<TITLE></TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<META content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0" name=GENERATOR>

 You are receiving this email from Blue Chip Brands. If you would prefer not to receive messages of this sort in the future, please see the unsubscribe instructions at the bottom of this email.

 Sincerely,

 Your New Offers Staff

 If
 you would prefer not to receive marketing messages from us, please click
 here to UNSUBSCRIBE.


Dear Parents of Mrs. Blair's Second Graders,

It is hard to believe that the school year is almost over. ?I hope it has
been a good year for your child. ?I am emailing everyone about two matters. ?

The first is the End of Year Party. ?It is on May 25th from 10:00 until
11:30. ?The format is a baseball game among the classes - the second graders
will be divided into four teams. ?After the game, we will serve hot dogs and
drinks. We have five volunteers to "help" but no one has volunteered to
chair
it. ?The volunteers are Norm Nabhan, Allison Grove, Karen George, Margaret
or
Mike Pierce, Lila Mazzone and Nancy Rybarezyk as sub. ?Does anyone out there
want to chair this party?

The second matter is our class gift to Mrs. Blair. ?We will get the three
second grade teachers gift certificates using the money we collected from
the
parents at our class meetings. ?I also think that it would be nice for each
child in Mrs. Blair's class to write her a letter thanking her for her
efforts as teacher, telling her what they liked about the class, special
memories, or anything they want to say. ?I propose that these letters be
written on 8 X 11 paper and that each one have the child's school picture
affixed to it. ?If everyone would bring these on the last day of school, we
can put them in a notebook and present them to Mrs. Blair. ?My idea for the
notebook is a thin three ring binder with a clear pocket on the front into
which we can insert a cover page.

Would anybody volunteer to purchase this book and create the cover page?
?(If
not, I will do it, but I am not particularly creative with this kind of
thing.) ?Please let me know and please have your child write the letter to
Mrs. Blair.

Please call me or email me if you have any questions or can volunteer your
assistance with anything.

Margaret Pierce
Room Parent


I knew you were going to say that!  But, dubba, what KIND of clothes?  Do I
need to bring jewelry? money? stockings?  I mean, what did YOU wear in LA?
What would you like for me to bring you?  nachos?(ha, ha)  The phoebebee says
hi.  Call me later if you're working.  ss

"CAVALIER,DEBORAH MD" <LAB-DSC@womans.com> on 09/30/99 11:04:13 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: LA

I think people dress in clothes.  I saw everybody in everything, it's
just that Patina seemed a little bit snootier than the others (the food
is fabulous though).  Maybe the Parkway Grill isn't on the list because
that's the wrong name of the restaurant.  Maybe it's really Perkway
Grillades.
Love you lots.
Deb

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sara Shackleton [SMTP:sshackl@ect.enron.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 10:26 AM
> To: CAVALIER,DEBORAH MD
> Subject: Re: LA
>
>
>
> I love you so much.  And you send great messages.  My life has always
> been a
> mess.  I never had a chance to tallk to you about Cuba and I'm totally
> fascinated with the island.  I sat next to this lawyer from NY on the
> flight
> from BA to Miami and he's recently separated and wants me to dump
> Mike.  I have
> a "house sitter" while I'm on vacation (thought I'd try it out since
> you
> probably would!).  Mike asked the concierge at "The Argyle" to make
> reservations
> from a list I prepared.  All of your suggestions except Parkway Grill
> appear.
> How do people in LA dress for dinner? HELP!  I have to pack tonight.
> I need new
> shoes.  I'll be in the office tomorrow until 4:15pm.  Bye now
> ................... Sass
>
>
>
>
> "CAVALIER,DEBORAH MD" <LAB-DSC@womans.com> on 09/30/99 10:09:53 AM
>
> To:   Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
> cc:
> Subject:  LA
>
>
>
> Hey Sass,
>
> My life is a mess!! I barely have time to pee.
> These are the restaurants I remember as great--Patina (but you can't
> wear jeans I don't think), La Campanile (maybe it's El Campanile) and
> Parkway Grill.
> Have fun.
> Love,
> Deb
>
>
>


If Susan's not at the Company anymore, how can she ask to be taken off the
list?

	Cheryl Johnson@ENRON
	01/16/2001 01:40 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Name Change/Merger Notification

Hi Tana,

You are already on the distribution.  I would only take your name off at your
own request.  Susan would also need to send me something in order to be taken
off the list.

Cheryl x33103

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 01/16/2001 01:24 PM
To: Cheryl Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Name Change/Merger Notification

Cheryl,

Please keep me on this list.  I need to get it because on EnronOnline.
Please take Susan Flynn off the list.  She is no longer in our group, and I'm
not sure if she's still with Enron.

	Cheryl Johnson@ENRON
	01/16/2001 12:05 PM

		 To: Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amelia Alland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Arfan
Aziz/LON/ECT@ECT, Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward D
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Berg
Carver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron, Georgia
Blanchard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
Coleman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike Croucher/HOU/ECT, Lisa Cousino/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Romeo D'Souza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Dawes/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Dudley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Elledge/NA/Enron@Enron, Faye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane
Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Daren
J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jacquelyn Farriel/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Genia
FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irene Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hoong P Foon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scotty
Gilbert/TOR/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Winston Goodbody/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjeev
Gupta/NA/Enron@ENRON, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect,
Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Harris/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marlene
Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect, Liz Hillman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Nathan L
Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy
Horn/LON/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nanette
Kettler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Troy Klussmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristian J
Lande/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT, Elsie Lew/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H
Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Little/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott F
Lytle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matilda Machado/CAL/ECT@ECT, Hillary
Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard C
McKeel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carey M Metz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard A Miley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT, Glenda D
Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom E Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jackie Morgan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Morris/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael W
Morris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Debbie Nicholls/LON/ECT@ECT, John
L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Oliver/EU/Enron@Enron, Frank
Ortiz/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Anita K Patton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina Perkins/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John D Powell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyril Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia
Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, EOL Call Center, Fiona
Skinner/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joshua Meachum/NA/Enron@ENRON, Justin
Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron,
Keith Clark/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt
Motsinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
Berzins/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rousseau
Anai/AP/Enron@Enron, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Simone La Rose/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald
P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Oscar
Rivera/NA/Enron@Enron, Suzy Robey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sam Round/HOU/ECT, Marilyn M
Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
Schneider/Corp/Enron@Enron, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dianne
Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, James Shirley/HOU/EES@EES, Lynn E Shivers/LON/ECT@ECT,
Michele Small/LON/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/LON/ECT@ECT, Willie
Stewart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Thompson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Mark D
Thorne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe Travis/LON/ECT@ECT, Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Laura Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Claire Viejou/LON/ECT@ECT, Elsa
Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karin Williams/HOU/EES@EES, Sony Wilson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christa Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeremy
Wong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Name Change/Merger Notification

Please find attached the Name Change/Merger Notification Report for January.
To launch the report, double click on the attachment and select Enable Macros
and Read Only.
Please note that:
 ERMS short names will be changed in GCP and ERMS each Friday at 10am Central
Time, and
 Inactivations will be made on Feb 1

We have made a few changes to our Name Change/Merger Notification Report - it
now has a new look and a couple of features we hope will assist you.  For
more information, please click below:

Each month now has two sheets, a summary sheet (eg Jan 01 Changes) and a
detailed sheet (eg Jan 01).
Click below for more information:

The summary sheet can be used to view all changes after a certain date.  If
you're aware of all changes up to, say, January 15th enter 01/16/2001 in cell
C6 of the Summary Sheet and click the Sort button in cell H6.  All changes
made to the report on or after January 16th will be listed automatically.
The Summary sheet may also be sorted for certain criteria - use the drop down
arrows alongside the column headers to make your selection.

This sheet contains all the information you are used to seeing, but slightly
reformatted.  Key points are:
In the case of an Inactivation, the cause of the Inactivation (eg Merger) is
listed in the Comments section
As with the previous format,
all months' reports will be sent cumulatively throughout the year
the report will be sent out twice each month, on the 15th and at the end of
the month.

It is our aim to publish the report in Livelink and to send out only the
summary sheet and a URL for the detailed report each month.  This will save a
lot of space in Lotus Notes and we hope it will streamline your monitoring
process.

We'd be very happy to receive any comments you may have.


Here is what about we have been showing Kennedy Oil.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitt, Mark
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 4:10 PM
To:	Lucci, Paul T.
Subject:	kennedy


Tana,   Per my voicemail, here is the invitation I'm planning on sending out.
Plz advise if you have any suggestions/comments and if you'd like me to mail
it out to your group or if you'd prefer to do that.

I need to provide a final headcount by next Monday, so plz let me know as
soon as possible.

Thx, Mercy  x35082

   You are invited to a "Get Acquainted" Happy Hour !!

    When:   Wednesday, March 7th

    Time:   6:00 - 8:00 p.m.

    Place: Cadillac Bar
      1802 Shepherd Drive
      (713) 862-2020

    Please R.S.V.P. by 5 p.m. Monday.


Attached are files incorporating suggested revisions for the change order to
Contract 24-LM6K-2-99 for the purchase of a generator step-up transformer for
the Pleasanton Project.

In lieu of the Exhibit A of the draft you sent out, I have substituted
Exhibit A, the GE proposal dated October 9, 2000.

I have substituted Exhibit B, GE's standard specifications for generator
step-up transformers, for the EE&CC specifications in the earlier draft. GE's
proposal is quoted on the basis of their standard GSU transformer
specification. I have this only in hard copy and have a call into GE to
verify this is the applicable standard and whether it is available in
electronic form. I will give you a copy, Dale.

The two additional documents were transmitted along with GE's proposal and I
have referenced them in Part I, Paragraph 2.


Zeigham,

Mike Roberts from my group will help you.

Vince

<zkhokher@mail.utexas.edu> on 09/22/2000 07:14:37 PM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Hi:

Hi Vince:
This Zeigham Khokher at the University of Texas at  Austin, Finance
Department.
?
I need some publicly available data that  unfortunately is not available
here.? It is basically the historical prices  for price of oil, gas and gold
futures contracts and options.
?
Again the data is strictly public info and not  proprietary at all.? Let me
know if there is a central data person at Enron  who would be able to help.?
All help will be of course gratefully  acknowledged.
?
Hope all is well, I hear you will be giving a talk  at UT this fall?and look
forward to seeing you then.
?
Regards
Zeigham
?
?


I knew it was Canadian and started with a "T".  Am I good or what!?!  When
you get to be my age you'll have no memory left.  Sure wish you were down
here enjoying these 109+ degree days with us.  It'll make you appreciate
Calgary in Winter.

	Peter Keohane
	09/06/2000 01:06 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Talisman

Milnthorp is following up with McKay who is back tomorrow.  PS TransAlta
Energy Marketing.


Christi L Nicolay@ECT
	11/10/2000 03:22 PM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC Staff Investigations on Midwest and Southeast Bulk Power
Systems

Please forward this to Rick's group.  Thanks.

Please note that these FERC staff reports contain some potentially helpful
information that can be used at the state PUC level, including information on
the increase in generation in the Midwest that market participants attribute
to lack of price caps following the summer 1998 price spikes; better
preparation for summer 2000 through the use of forward contracts and
transmission problems that may have resulted in keeping cheaper power from
particular markets.

On 11/1/00, FERC Staff issued reports on its Investigation of Bulk Power
Markets in the Eastern Interconnection.  These reports were the result of a
Commission order earlier this summer.  Enron's Federal regulatory staff
(Christi, Charles Yeung, and Sarah Novosel) provided a great deal of
information for this investigation and Joe Hartsoe and Donna Fulton discussed
many of the problems with the grid with the new head of Staff, Scott Miller
(who recently joined FERC from PG&E Gen).    While the Commission is under no
obligation to take any of Staff's recommendations, the Commission typically
looks to Staff for guidance on transmission and market issues.  Importantly,
Staff concludes that the Commission should consider these options for the
Southeast and Midwest -- all of which Enron has been asking FERC to implement
for several years:

Reduce the advantages of network service over point to point service by
requiring that native load be served under the same tariff as other
transmission services to eliminate the current incentives that VIUs have to
favor their native load through the calculation of ATC and handling of
interconnection requests.

While the Staff Hotline is used productively, the Commission can direct Staff
to conduct formal investigations into entities that have a pattern of
complaints.

The Commission could require TPs to submit tariff provisions containing a pro
forma interconnection process specific to interconnection, rather than simply
relying on the Tennessee Power order that utilizes the OATT timelines and
procedures.

Require TPs to retain real-time transmission data on market functions
pertaining to daily load, internal generation to meet that load, and imports
and exports.

RTOs should submit the basis and methods for calculating ATC and TTC, as well
as standardized criteria for curtailment.  In addition, since even such
standardized criteria might not "get to the root of the problem" -- that
control area still control generation -- the Commission could require that
each RTO set a date certain by which it will create one control area.
Regardless of the implementation of these two options, the Commission could
standardize ATC and TTC methodology.

Staff finds that while electricity is a commodity with market characteristics
similar to many other commodities, it is still viewed as "different," with a
reaction of price caps.  Staff encourages that basic decisions about the
regulatory model be made in order to complete the transition from a
traditional cost-of-service model to a model that uses markets to price the
commodity and services.

DETAILS  (Also, the reports contain good summaries of the generation,
transmission, state retail, federal reg. and other issues for the region):

Midwest:  The Midwest is dominated by vertically integrated Transmission
Providers ("TPs") that control transmission, generation and load.  "As such,
they have weak economic incentives to provide access to transmission service
to third-parties and strong incentives to favor their own services."  Staff
received numerous complaints; however, due to the lack of information
available from TPs, Staff cannot conclude whether these are isolated
incidents or wide-spread.  At the very least, the complaints indicate a lack
of confidence in the bulk power market and the ability of market participants
to rely on transmission access, thus harming the liquidity of the market.

TLRs are the most important transmission issue in the Midwest, with an
"enormous" increase in 2000.  The region showed a decline in peak load from
1999 to 2000 and a growth in new generation since the 1998 price spikes.
Even though there was an increase in generation and mild weather with
virtually no price spikes, TLRs climbed to record numbers.  The TLRs were
highly concentrated:  only 5 flowgates account for 41% of ECAR TLRs and
another 5 flowgates in MAIN account for 42% in that region.  Notably, even
though the NERC procedures for Level 3 TLRs mandate transaction curtailment,
78 of the 191 TLRs in the Midwest do not show any curtailment amount.  The
total amount of relief that these curtailments are intended to produce are
not posted.  Staff notes that TLR rules are established by NERC, whose
procedures are voluntary and not enforced by penalties.  While the Commission
has required certain NERC standards and procedures to be placed in Open
Access Transmission Tariffs ("OATT") where the Commission has the power to
enforce provisions under the Federal Power Act, in practice the Commission
has generally deferred to NERC on transmission reliability questions,
including the propriety of TLRs.

TLRs inhibit optimal functioning of the transmission system and market
because load is not served by the least cost supplier.  TLR procedure is an
inefficient instrument in mitigating constraints -- curtailment by fiat.  In
addition, the NERC IDC can result in inappropriate curtailments or increased
loading on the affected flowgate.  The impact could be mitigated by one
control area per RTO.

Staff notes that the Midwest state commissions did not petition FERC for
price caps following the 1998 price spikes.  Some market participants believe
that the absence of price spikes is the single reason that NUG construction
increased in the Midwest.

Market participants must keep track of, and follow, a plethora of information
in order to make energy deals, submit reservations and provide schedules for
service.  Staff received many complaints about barriers to transmission
access, including TLR curtailments and a lack of standardized information and
protocols, particularly for ATC and interconnection requests, and
discriminatory conduct.  Unbelievably, key data was unavailable to Staff,
such coincident peak load data, system-wide snap shots for days when TLRs
were called, and import/export data.  This lack of data creates a market
inefficiency, because neither market participants nor regulators can fully
analyze market conditions in real time.  As such, the market is risk adverse,
eschewing long-term deals for short-term transactions.  Staff also noted that
because the Security Coordinators often work for the IOU, there is a mixed
incentive to enforce reliability on the grid and maximize profit for the
IOU.  (Staff cites Richard Tabors' paper, "Transmission Markets, Stretching
the Rules for Fun and Profit.")

Staff cites the lack of information on OASIS or on the NERC web site,
particularly about real time TLRs and curtailments.  Examples were provided
to Staff of transmission refusals when there were no TLRs posted and improper
implementation of TLRs causing substantial financial loss.

The currently proposed Midwest RTOs may mitigate some problems; however, all
three retain existing control areas with the favortism for generation and
native load.  These incentives will continue to remain until the RTO
exercises complete autonomy over transmission control and security
coordinator functions.  Staff notes that the Midwest is a balkanized region
of 61 control areas with no uniform method for calculating ATC and CBM.  The
result is that ATCs can be different on 2 different sides of an interface.
Staff notes examples in inaccurate ATCs and states that Staff's own ATC audit
this summer was consistent with market participant complaints.  Staff is
weighing follow-up options.  The result of these problems is a lack of
liquidity.

Staff next noted the problems with unfiled "business practices," especially
on the next hour market.  Staff's audit of OASIS sites revealed several areas
of non-compliance.

Information transparency is necessary for a market to function efficiently,
with equal and timely access to data, including ATC, CBM, TRM, and load flow
input data.  TPs have incentives to resist efforts to make this information
transparent because of native load.  This incentive will still exist under
RTOs if utilities are allowed to calculate their own ATC.  ***  "As a
consequence, the Commission may wish to eliminate the native load exemption
and have all transactions under the same tariff."  ***  The Commission could
benefit by having access to existing transmission data and should require the
TPs to retain data, including current real-time network status.

Interconnection Issues:  IPPs need to be compensated for VAR support.  Also,
Staff cites a number of Hotline complaints about TPs seeking large deposits
or failing to complete System Impact Studies timely.  One solution is to have
the RTO handle this function to eliminate the disincentive the utilities have
against IPPs.  The current practice of requiring IPPs to deal with a wide
variety of procedures inhibits the free flow of transactions within the
region.

Network service has inherent advantages over point-to-point, citing the
Entergy source and sink order.  The Commission has relied on "passively"
receiving informal and formal complaints to determine if discriminatory
behavior has occurred rather than actively canvassing market participants.
While Staff cannot conclude that discriminatory practices are widespread,
there is evidence of discriminatory instances.

Southeast:  The traditional vertically integrated utility ("VIU") model has
largely persisted in the SE.  This continued control has vastly reduced the
economic incentives to facilitate IPP activities.  In many cases, the VIUs
have dampened IPP involvement without violating any Commission regulation due
to the inherent flexibility of the current rules.

Staff cites examples of delays in performing system impact studies,
transmission hoarding in the name of serving native load growth and
manipulation of ATC.  TPs have shown little inclination to improve the
transmission system and use many TLRs.

There is also a lack of market information that has stymied the development
of markets in the SE.  ATCs change constantly that leads to uncertainty and
there is no clearinghouse for electric power prices.

TVA, despite having taken steps to participate in reformed markets, has acted
as a bulwark against the development of competitive energy markets in the
SE.  This is significant because of TVA's size and location.  IPPs have
reported TVA's discouragement of siting in TVA through excessive time to
perform studies, excessive fees, and rejection of requests to perform
interconnection studies.

In addition, Staff cites the Florida Sup. Ct. decision against merchant
plants as significantly impeding the competitive market in Florida.

Staff discusses the significant flow of power from the Midwest to the SE this
summer.  Much of this resulted from the import of cheaper coal power, than
the use of gas fired peakers due to higher gas prices.  Peak prices were
radically lower this summer because utilities appear to have been better
prepared for peak events through the use of forward contracts, increased
generation capacity on line and reduced number of forced outages.

SE utilities reported that they have not used market-based rates to
extensively increase sales.  (Less used than in the midwest.)

The SE region lacks information, which has retarded the Staff's efforts to
discern the truth about the numerous complaints about transmission in the SE
(including ATC and TLRs).  Market participants seem to have less confidence
in the SE market than in any other market region.  This appears to be
justified based on Staff's investigations.  This lack of confidence
discourages investment and participation in the markets.  Staff concludes
that the Commission may need to be more prescriptive in terms of how
transmission is allocated in the SE RTOs, since there are market concerns
that the incumbents will continue to dominate operations.  The investigation
found numerous problems in bad ATCs and TTCs and poor OASIS postings.  In
addition, several OASIS audit logs actually erased historical data.  Staff
thinks that additional affiliate transaction information should be posted.
Staff could not obtain summer demand data and the Commission's lack of
jurisdiction over TVA made it difficult to obtain transmission access
information.

The Staff investigation revealed unclear interconnection procedures and lack
of adherence to schedules and arbitrary cost estimates and deposits.  In
addition, the TPs have reserved a huge amount of network transmission
capacity, much of it reserved shortly after the IPP approached the TP to
interconnect.  Staff cites the recent Skygen order in which Southern denied
Skygen's request for transmission stating that the only option was the
construction of an 80 mile 500 kv line that would take 8 years to complete.
Staff solutions include allowing network requests by IPPs and limiting
self-build capacity in the incumbent's territory.

ATC variations are a big problem in the SE.  SERC coordination of a
standardized ATC is a long process and may not be resolved soon without
direction from the Commission.  An improved method and improved communication
are needed.

The SE experienced a 354% increase in TLRs this summer.  This increase raises
the issue of whether curtailment has become an impediment to the competitive
operation of the market in the SE.  Staff cites information provided by
Charles Y. that an Ameren TLR was not implemented according to NERC
criteria.  Staff also wonders if transmission is being oversold since TPs do
not generally refund transmission revenues when TLRs are implemented.  RTOs
must have a broad geographic area to internalize much of the constraints.  In
addition, RTOs will adopt pricing mechanisms that obviate recourse to TLRs.
However, if control areas are retained, VIUs will retain mixed incentives.

*** As noted in the Midwest report, the manner in which load is calculated
weighs heavily on the value of this information.  This is an issue that the
formation of RTOs may not resolve.  Eliminating native load exceptions -- ie,
treating all load equally -- and placing all transactions under the same
tariff may be an option that provides the right incentives for the provision
of transparent and standardized information.

Finally, Staff describes specific problems with TVA and FP&L, TVA is a
"problem area" for the Eastern Interconnect grid.  TVA is a transmission
bottleneck due to the many TLRs called this summer.  The current federal law
and lack of Commission jurisdiction are impediments to the development of
deep and robust power markets in this area.  TVA simply has no strong
incentive to provide effective and efficient transmission service.  In
addition, the Commission does not have full information on TVA.  Staff lists
a number of complaints against TVA, including unjustifiably increasing the
tag deadline and allowing TVA Marketing, but not others, to sink and park
power.  Staff concludes that recent proposals by TVA to enhance the
development of markets and its system do not appear to have great potential.

A Staff audit of FP&L revealed violations of standards of conduct, including
confidential information on FP&L's transmission system (including interchange
information for other entities) posted on EMS systems that were available to
FPL's merchant function.  Staff's report found that FP&L does not have an
established procedure for review of EMS to ensure that information is not
displayed in error.  It is "up to individual Managers discretion."  ((FRCC
web site report dated 9/8/00)).  Violations such as these undermine
competition.

The reports are attached below.

 - southeast.pdf
 - midwest.pdf


Mark and Tana:
Enclosed is the note Mike sent to Curtis today. Hopefully this will get the
ball rolling.

Regards,
TC
---------------------- Forwarded by Tobin Carlson/HOU/ECT on 02/18/2000 10:22
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Michael E Moscoso                           02/18/2000 09:43 AM

To: Curtis Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tobin Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Post ids

Curtis,

The TAGG IQ report we run daily compares our positions to our limits per the
NYMEX.  It is imperative that this report is accurate at all times.  There is
a significant amount of risk associated with violating our NYMEX limits,
including disallowing Enron to trade futures.  This would be a very serious
problem.   Our legal department receives this report daily to ensure we are
complying with our limits.

Please let me know what I need to do to get a resource to review the problem
we are having.   Your proposed alternative solution will not work on a daily
basis.  The TAGG IQ report includes many other commodities besides natural
gas.  Your assistance is greatly appreciated.

Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT on 02/18/2000
09:36 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tobin Carlson                           02/18/2000 09:36 AM

To: Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Post ids

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Tobin Carlson/HOU/ECT on 02/18/2000 09:35
AM ---------------------------
Curtis Smith   02/17/2000 11:12 AM

To: Tobin Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Post ids

The problem with your port calc's is there is no April futures price being
loaded.  Speak with Veronica Arriaga about that.  The other is there is no
Volatility curve loaded for NBSK.  Speak to Robert Richard about that.

The report is probably not accurate.  It was written long ago and we just do
not have the resources at the moment to look at it.  The much better solution
is to run an ERMS report that you have used in the past.  Dutch Quigley will
be able to help you with that.  Dutch will only be able to help you with
Natural Gas, if there are other commodities in question let me know.

Thanks,
Curtis

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tobin Carlson                           02/16/2000 05:04 PM

To: Curtis Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Post ids

Curtis:

I need some help in the following areas. Do you think you could help me?

First, the following post ids for TAGG/METACALC Metaid #10472 are always
erroring out. It doesn't matter what time of the day I run it. They are as
follows:

622013
622012
576271
247701
216939
216946

Any information you could provide would be appreciated.

Secondly, I am not too sure that the TAGG IQ report that I send to Mark
Taylor in Legal is working properly. I have no way of telling, however from
my side. Do you know at all? Is this something you can advise? The report is
under Report Group: Exchange Controls. The The Report name is Limits.IQR. The
numbers are not changing from day-to-day. I would appreciate it if you could
look into this.

Thanks for your time,
Tobin


OK you slackers (excluding Shaw), I'll give you another chance to respond.
Lunch this week or next, let me know what's good.  If meeting after work is
better for you, let me know.  Certainly all of you can stop shredding
documents for 5 minutes to respond.

Schroeder


Larry has obtained Stan Horton's verbal approval to recognize Fred
Rimington's responsibilities as President of Black Mesa Pipeline by moving
him up to ML04 from ML03.   Will you please arrange the necessary personnel
action form for signatures by myself, Larry and Stan ?    I  will defer any
salary action until the year end review/merit action date next February 1st.


Elena,

Please, prepare for Mulong NG and power price series.
We can use  Henry Hub for NG, Cinergy, Cobb and PV for electricity.

We can send him NG price right away. Electricity prices are different: he has
to obtain
permission from FT (Megawatts Daily). I shall cc you on my msg to him.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001
02:03 PM ---------------------------

mulong wang <mlwang@uts.cc.utexas.edu> on 04/15/2001 03:43:26 AM
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com
cc: Richard MacMinn <macminnr@uts.cc.utexas.edu>
Subject: Weather and energy price Data

Dear Dr. Kaminski:

I am a PhD Candidate under the supervision of Drs. Richard MacMinn and
Patrick Brockett. I am now working on my dissertation which is focused on
the weather derivatives and credit derivatives.

Could you kindly please offer me some real weather data information about
the price peak or plummet because of the weather conditions?

The past winter of 2000 was very cold nationwide, and there may be a
significant price jump for natural gas or electricity. Could you
please offer me some energy price data during that time period?

Your kind assistance will be highly appreciated and have a great day!

Mulong


I AGREE WITH KAL.


FYI.  She's forwarding around the Valley, and I'll follow up to make sure
that she's having Chambers sign and send.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/03/2001 10:48 AM -----

	Laura Ipsen <lipsen@cisco.com>
	04/02/2001 07:04 PM

		 To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Customer Choice Package

Done.

Laura

At 06:48 PM 4/2/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Laura:
>Good talking to you.  Per our conversation, here's the package.  Thanks
>very much for passing it along.  If you have any questions, etc., don't
>hesitate.  415.782.7822
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/02/2001 06:45 PM -----
>
>
>(See attached file: Ken Lay Letter re direct access.doc)(See attached file:
>CA_key legislators list.doc)(See attached file: CA_constituent letter to
>Gov Davis.doc)(See attached file: CA_constituent letter to Speaker
>Hertzberg.doc)(See attached file: CA_constituent letter to Assemblyman
>Keeley.doc)(See attached file: CA_constituent letter to Assemblyman
>Cox.doc)(See attached file: CA_constituent letter to Senator Burton.doc)
>(See attached file: CA_constituent letter to Senator Bowen.doc)(See
>attached file: CA_Talking Points on Direct Access for Sacto
>legislators.doc)(See attached file: CA_Talking Points Restore The Right To
>Choose.doc)(See attached file: CA_Talking Points on CPUC rate increase.doc)
>(See attached file: CA_economic impact one-pager 3.21.doc)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


It's not the same as a self evaluation form but I hope you find this
informative as to my where abouts this year.  I am collecting similar lists
from the folks who report to me.


The following points refer to the methodology that we are taking to rebook
the New Albany Plant.  Please send me a note immediately if you disagree.
Assume that NewAlb is a non mark to market entity and Enron is the mark to
market entity.  However, it is fully owned and operated by us for now.

*  The power mark to market book will pay NewAlb a capacity payment of $4.87
for 5 years.  We shaped this payment as follows:

2001 - $5.06
2002 - $4.96
2003 - $4.86
2004 - $4.75
2005 - $4.65

*  This payments allows Enron to supply gas to NewAlb and receive power.

*  Enron will pay NewAlb $1000 per unit start.

*  Enron will also pay NewAlb $2.00/MW hour for varialbe o&m.

*  This will create an entity "NewAlb" that will return 9% assuming a book
value of $336/kw on 12/31/2005 vs. 409 currently.

*  If NewAlb pays the 9% out that entity should be relatively flat each year
for the next five.


Eric,

There are a multitude of cases run on this project over time and it's hard for everyone to pick the most current.  Please refer any facility questions to Planning and Optimization so we can respond with the most current information.  Arnold is right where the pipe lengths are but has the wrong story why.

Ron M.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Eisenstein, Arnold L.
Sent:	Friday, March 08, 2002 1:17 PM
To:	Gadd, Eric
Cc:	Smith, Mike L.; Rosenberg, David E.; Matthews, Ron
Subject:	RE: Sun Devil Cost Sheet

The COMPLETE mainline loop from SJ tie-in to takeoff point between stations 1 and 2 was always about 222 miles.  Then add 16.5 miles downstream of station 1 for pressure support and the total is 238.61.   Some of the previous cases you have  seen did not include FULL looping, starting the Phoenix lateral at Station 2 and relied on more compression.

The Red Hawk lateral new length is based on starting at the end of the Panda Lateral to Red Hawk paralleling and existing line.

Arnold Eisenstein
tel:       713-345-3666 (new)
fax:      713-646-7522
e-mail: arnold.l.eisenstein@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gadd, Eric
Sent:	Friday, March 08, 2002 11:21 AM
To:	Eisenstein, Arnold L.
Subject:	FW: Sun Devil Cost Sheet

Arnold,

Why has the mainline estimate gone from 174.61 miles to 238.6 miles?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rosenberg, David E.
Sent:	Friday, March 08, 2002 11:04 AM
To:	Hyatt, Kevin; Centilli, James
Cc:	Gadd, Eric
Subject:	FW: Sun Devil Cost Sheet

Not sure why they just sent it to me.  At any rate, here is the estimate consistent with the scope in the Power Point presentation being prepared for Stan.

I would say let me know what else I can do, but I'm getting ready for a command performance this afternoon with Horton and head off to spring break vacation with my wife and high school freshman tomorrow.

I'll be back Monday week.  Actually, Arnold or Mike Smith should be able to answer any questions you may have.

(oops, I just noticed that the Red Hawk line is about 10 miles shorter here.  Not sure what that is about.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thomas, Timothy
Sent:	Friday, March 08, 2002 7:49 AM
To:	Smith, Mike L.
Cc:	Martin, Jerry D.; Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Matthews, Ron; Rosenberg, David E.
Subject:	Sun Devil Cost Sheet

Pursuant to a Thursday, March 7, 2002, ~1:00 PM meeting with Ron Matthews, Arnold Eisenstein, Mike Smith, George Davis and Tim Thomas, transmitted herewith is the cost file for the project scenario, route and pricing format as formulated during said meeting  .....

 << File: Scope Cost 030802 Rev 0.xls >>

Estimated costs are based on the following parameters  .....

36" x 96.97 Miles BLFD C/S to SJCT		Estimate / Benchmark of iDATE September 21, 2001, Revision 1

Standing Rock Compressor Station		Estimate / Benchmark of iDATE September 25, 2001, Revision 0

36" x 238.61 Miles SJCT to Needles		Estimate / Benchmark of iDATE September 21, 2001, Revision 1
						36" TW Mainline Loop - 36" x 174.61 Miles
						Derived 238.61 Mile Estimate based on aforementioned $ / Inch-Mile

36" x 133.54 Miles Phoenix Lateral		Estimate / Benchmark of iDATE September 21, 2001, Revision 1

36" x 35.29 Miles Panda Extension		Estimate / Benchmark of iDATE September 21, 2001, Revision 0

30" x 17.25 Miles Red Hawk Pipeline		Benchmark Estimate of iDATE February 28, 2002, Revision 2
						Estimate Revised 03.07.02 - Revised from 16 Miles to 17.25 Miles

Balance of Compressor Station Costs		Cost Data per Arnold Eisenstein


Attached please find the talking points on DPC to support your efforts in
Washington, D.C.


Five of us met this past Tuesday for the first time, and it worked out
really well.  We are going to do it again the same time and place:

Time: Tuesday (11/9) 6-8pm

Place: BofA building (corner of Kearny and CA) 30th floor (Aaron's office)
415-263-3320 if you get lost.

Last time we reviewed the Econ class notes and discussed the homework.  I
was thinking this week we could do that for one hour, and then discuss the
Accounting Case.

Please e-mail ME if you are planning on attending so we can get you through
the wall of security at Aaron's office and get you fed.  (We order in pizza
and will rotate who pays)


The owner has requested a report for the month of January like the one you
provided for Feb. What are your thoughts?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron on 03/28/2002
02:26 PM ---------------------------

wcmarshall@aep.com on 03/28/2002 02:08:22 PM
To: Kurt.Anderson@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: WR574 Wind and Turbine Data Clear Sky

Do you have this same data for January at Clear Sky?

Ward Marshall
Director, Business Development
AEP Energy Services, Inc.
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus, OH 43215-2373

Office (614)324-6957
Fax (614)324-6994
Cell (614)314-5538


That is the home run that I want to hit with this form, Scott, but GE needs
to give us a few days to work out an approach on that. I will discuss it with
Sheila on how to approach the issue from the EWS perpective

JWVS

	Scott Dieball
	05/15/2001 12:39 PM

		 To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roseann
Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: World Hunger Contract

GE thinks that once we finalize the terms of this contract that this contract
will form the basis for future purchases by Enron and not just ENA.  Do we
need to involve other Enron biz units in the sign off process?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/15/2001 11:41 AM

		 To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Roseann
Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate, pthompson@akllp.com, John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: World Hunger Contract

Hi there.

I am attaching for the group's consideration a red line that I ran comparing
the current working draft (v4) with the draft John R. recently circulated to
Tax and Insurance.

I suggest that Pete Thompson keep the typewriter on this.  We are getting so
close to the end, I would really like to try to avoid confusion.

I am also attaching a clean copy of the current active version, and the
current list of issues under consideration.  I suggest we work through this
list and turn another draft before soliciting Cris/Herman and Lisa's
comments.  We should also give the ENA commercial reps the opportunity to
review it at that time.

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99 08:08
AM ---------------------------

emcmurr@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/29/99 03:09:22 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron 24 Hour contacts

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric McMurry/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/29/99
03:16 PM ---------------------------

Eric McMurry
12/29/99 02:22 PM

To: chrisgermany@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Enron 24 Hour contacts

Chris, Attached are the memos we sent out for 24 hour contacts.

Call with any questions

Eric   McMurry      713-693-2821

 - CG&E.doc
 - NIMO.doc
 - Hopewell CoGeneration L.doc
 - enrontransition.doc


<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">

<BASE HREF="http://football210.fantasy.sportsline.com/mp/">

Save 10% Speak No Evil, Hear No Evil Monkey Bikes... One of the Hottest Gifts for Holiday 2001... Just enter the coupon code MQJ36GX6 in the checkout process to receive your discount.  Offer expires November 16, 2001.

Want to win your Fantasy League?  Our Fantasy Football Guides are the SOURCE for strategy, player ratings, scouting reports, team reports, projections and more!  A must have for beginners and Fantasy veterans alike.  Special in season price $9.99. Going Fast - Click Here!

Save $.05 a gallon on the gas that keeps your car's engine clean. Click here to apply online.

Brought to you by

<MAP NAME="menu.map">
<AREA shape="rect" coords="0, 1, 83, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/217/sffer1113e.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="83, 1, 166, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/12/sffer1113w.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="166, 1, 249, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/226/sffer1113c.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="249, 1, 332, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffer1113v.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="332, 1, 415, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/163/sffer1113t.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="415, 1, 498, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/1/sffer1113s.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="498, 1, 581, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/10/sffer1113i.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="581, 1, 664, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/3/sffer1113ffr.cgi">

</MAP>

You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for
    CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule,
    or turn off these reports please
    click here

NFL Reports, Player Updates

Latest NFL Player News

Santana Moss, WR NYJ - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Moss made his pro debut on Sunday, but did not catch a pass and was stopped for a six-yard loss on his one carry. The rookie has missed too much time to make a Fantasy impact this season.

Richard Huntley, RB CAR - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Huntley actually had a good outing against San Francisco, posting 94 scrimmage yards and a touchdown. However, he's far too inconsistent to start on a weekly basis.
!
Chris Weinke, QB CAR - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Weinke started Sunday's game against San Francisco after missing last week's game due to a shoulder injury. He put up decent numbers, throwing for 177 yards and two touchdowns in Carolina's 25-22 OT loss.

Wayne Chrebet, WR NYJ - Fear Updated 11/18/01
Chrebet did not catch a pass at Miami. The Jets' wideout is no longer worthy of a starting spot on Fantasy teams.

G!
ar!
rison Hearst
, RB SF - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Hearst had another strong game, posting 113 scrimmage yards against Carolina. His comeback from a serious ankle condition is nothing short of miraculous, and he's actually been a reliable Fantasy player over the last two weeks.

Alex Van Pelt, QB BUF - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Van Pelt threw for 316 yards, two TDs and no interceptions against the Seahawks. He did lose a fumble, but Van Pelt got solid protection for most of the game and will be a respectable Fantasy backup while he fills in for the injured Rob Johnson.

Jeff Garcia, QB SF - Martin Cuilla Updated 11/18/01
Garcia had another huge game, posting 305 yards and three touchdowns against Carolina. He's been one of the top three Fantasy quarterbacks this season, and may even be more valuable than Peyton Manning at this point.

Peerless Price, WR BUF - Matt Lenhart Updated 11/18/01
Price caught 10 passes for 138 yards and a TD against Seattle. He has clearly become Buffalo's best Fantasy player this season.

Matt Hasselbeck, QB SEA - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01</F!
ON!
T>

Hasselbeck threw for 134 yards, one TD and no interceptions at Buffalo. The Seattle QB is making less mistakes, yet he doesn't help Fantasy teams much, either.

Jon Kitna, QB CIN - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Kitna put up 234 yards passing and a touchdown against Tennessee, but two interceptions made his performance mediocre. He's no better than a reserve Fantasy player at this point, best used when the matchup is right in a deeper league.

Koren Robinson, WR SEA - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Robin!
so!
n caught two passes for 15 yards at Buffalo, including his first career TD, a seven-yarder. Robinson is slowly improving, but still does not produce enough to be a reliable Fantasy player.

Corey Dillon, RB CIN - Matt Lenhart Updated 11/18/01
Dillon was held in check by Tennessee, rushing for only 38 yards on Sunday. However, with all the injured running backs around the league this season, Dillon is still a must-start on a weekly basis.

Steve McNair, QB TEN - Rocks Updated 11/18/01

McNair played despite a sore thumb, throwing for 172 yards and a touchdown against Cincinnati. He's been an unreliable Fantasy player this season, and is worth starting only when the matchup is right.

Eddie George, RB TEN - Fear Updated 11/18/01
George was unimpressive once again, posting only 65 scrimmage yards on Sunday against Cincinnati. He just doesn't seem to be at full speed this season, and has been a huge Fantasy disappointment.

Ricky Williams, RB NO - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Williams had a big game on Sunday, rushing for 12!
0 !
yards and a touchdown against Indianapolis. He continues to prove his value as a Fantasy player, and is a must-start ever week.

Aaron Brooks, QB NO - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Brooks had an outstanding game against Indianapolis, throwing for 249 yards and two touchdowns. He's put together two straight solid games, and may finally be reaching the potential the coaching staff knew he was capable of.

Peyton Manning, QB IND - Tori Kuykendall Updated 11/18/01

Manning put up a decent performance against New Orleans, posting 262 yards and a touchdown. He may not be putting up Manning-like numbers this season, but he's still far too valuable to ever consider benching.

Marcus Pollard, TE IND - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Pollard had a huge game on Sunday, catching three passes for 126 yards and a touchdown against New Orleans. He may not be the most consistent Fantasy player, but the lack of tight end depth around the league makes him a valuable commodity.

Donovan McNabb, QB PHI - Eric Bass Updated 11/18/01
<!
FO!
NT SIZE=2>McNabb was unimpressive on Sunday, compiling only 153 scrimmage yards and a touchdown against Dallas. Despite the mediocre performance, McNabb is still one of the best Fantasy quarterbacks in the league.

Ryan Leaf, QB DAL - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Leaf was horrible for the second straight week, throwing for only 102 yards with two interceptions. Incidently, both picks were returned for touchdowns as Dallas fell to Philadelphia, 36-3.

Emmitt Smith, RB DAL - Rocks Updated 11/18/01

Smith left Sunday's game against Philadelphia in the second half with an apparent knee injury. He did not return to the game, and finished the day with 90 scrimmage yards and a fumble.

Tyrone Wheatley, RB OAK - Tori Kuykendall Updated 11/18/01
Wheatley (knee) had been declared inactive for Sunday's game against San Diego. Zack Crockett will spell starter Charlie Garner in Wheatley's absence.

Tim Dwight, WR SD - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Dwight (lung) was declared inactive for Sunday's game against Oakland.

Freddie Jones, TE SD - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Jones (ankle) has been declared inactive for Sunday's game. He has been advised not to play for two weeks.

Fred Taylor, RB JAC - Hunter Shively Updated 11/18/01
Taylor (groin) has been declared inactive for Sunday's game against Pittsburgh. Stacey Mack will make the start in his absence, with Elvis Joseph seeing some action as well.

Mark Brunell, QB JAC - Top Dogs <FON!
T !
SIZE=1>
Updated 11/18/01
Brunell (quadriceps) has been declared inactive for Sunday's game. Jonathan Quinn will start in his place.

Cameron Cleeland, TE NO - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Cleeland (ankle) has been declared inactive for Sunday's game against Indianapolis. Boo Williams and Lamont Hall will split time at tight end in his absence.

Dez White, WR CHI - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
White (ankle) will start Sunday's game. He still may not do much against the Tampa Bay defense. </F!
ON!
T>

James Jackson, RB CLE - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Jackson (ankle) did not start in Sunday's game. Jamel White started against the Ravens.

Steve McNair, QB TEN - Rocks Updated 11/18/01
McNair will start Sunday's game against Cincinnati as long after taking pre-game snaps without any problems. McNair, who is dealing with a thumb injury, isn't worth starting on your Fantasy team outside of deeper leagues.

More Updates

Schedule, Breakdown

Rocks

Player	Pos	Points

McNair, Steve	QB	16.0

Smith, Emmitt	RB	0.0

Watters, Ricky	RB	0.0

Ismail, Raghib	WR	6.0

Mayes, Derrick	WR	0.0

Sharpe, Shannon	TE	1.0

Conway, Brett	K	0.0

Redskins	DT	0.0

TOTAL	 	23.0

Warren, Chris	RB	0.0

Bennett, Donnell	RB	0.0

Batch, Charlie	QB	14.0

Couch, Tim	QB	12.0

Davis, Tyrone	TE	0.0

Schroeder, Bill	WR	16.0

		at Eric Bass

Player	Pos	Points

Grbac, Elvis	QB	12.0

	RB	0.0

Allen, James	RB	1.0

Harrison, Marvin	WR	35.0

Hayes, Donald	WR	1.0

Horn, Joe	WR	21.0

Nedney, Joe	K	4.0

Ravens	DT	11.0

TOTAL	 	85.0

Lions	DT	4.0

Anders, Kimble	RB	0.0

Davis, Terrell	RB	11.0

McNabb, Donovan	QB	29.0

Morris, Sylvester	WR	0.0

Robinson, Marcus	WR	0.0

Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.
Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com

FB10SP


How's Nadine and baby by the way?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sarkissian, Arshak
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 12:54 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Hi...

Hi Louise,  Suarez was too shy to pass my message along when you called a few minutes ago.  Just wanted to say hi...

How is the baby doing?

Arshak.


East Power 		-800
Canada JD		-100
Canada Power		250
West Power		unable to get on phone

Total 	+6,250

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shively, Hunter S.
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 1:01 PM
To:	Lavorato, John; Hayden, Frank
Subject:	net change as of 1:00 P.M.

Central         +800
East          +1,100
Texas        +1,200
West             -200
Financial    +4,000 (mostly front)

total           +6,900


Pat:

Recently, I talked with you about ordering another filing unit.  It turns out that we need 2 more filing units.  Please order them the same size as the floor to ceiling cabinet we have.  Have the inside of the cabinets configured as follows:

1 Cabinet should have 5 shelves
1 Cabinet should have 6 shelves

When Interstore was here today reconfiguing 2 of our existing cabinets, they removed 8 shelves that they are going to use on these new units.

Please price these 2 new units and charge them to Co. # 0413, RC # 107043.  Please let me the prices and approximate delivery date.  Also, let me  know if you need anything else.  Thanks.  Anita


****NEW -- priceline.com announces FREE long distance!*****
Get 60 FREE long distance minutes when you buy 60 minutes
or more.  That's one hour of long distance calling to
anywhere in the U.S., absolutely FREE! Click here now:
http://www.priceline.com/promo/buy60.asp
***********************************************************
Dear MATHEW D SMITH,

We have an answer for you regarding your hotel request!

Please click on the link below for all the details:
http://www.priceline.com/hotels/checkstatus/default.asp?id=31329227209

If you wish, you can also go to the priceline.com home page and select "Hotel Rooms" in the
"Check Previous Request" area to get your answer.  Use the hotel request number below to sign in.

Your Priceline Hotel Request Number:  31329227209

Thanks for using priceline.com!  If you have any trouble using the special link above,
please call us toll free at 1-800-657-9168 for assistance.

Sincerely,

priceline.com Customer Service

***************************************************************
Save up to 20% or more on your rental car! You'll get the
type of car you want with unlimited mileage from one of the
top 5 name-brand car rental companies. Click here now:
http://www.priceline.com/RentalCars/itinerary.asp

***************************************************************


Jane,
I certainly fine with joining the board.
mike


Mr. Lay:

I appreciate the time you took to review my memo concerning internal communications suggestions. Cindy Olson called to thank me and Sarah Davis did meet with me to discuss the memo.

I have some ideas regarding the transition and would like to share them with you and/or your communication transition team.  Could you please put me in contact with your team handling the communications for the transition or meet with me personally to discuss?  I would only take a few minutes of your time.

Thank you again for your time and all that you have done for us. You have a large following that are here to support you and Enron.  We just need direction from the top, more importantly, you.

Yours Sincerely,

Amanda Day
Associate
Enron North America
Southeast Power
713.345.1793


As discussed on the Power Marketers conference call, attached is the final consolidated version of the 'Bare Essentials' handouts from FERC RTO Week.


How could they justify going after only electronic traded deals. Wouldn't
they need to attack all deals done ever using a Platt's price as a reference
price ? Good Luck..


Lisa is a real hoot. Smart, tough as nails.  She pulls no punches.

Michael seems to feel better, but he has terrible circle under this eyes.
I'm going to insist that the doctor give him 3 rounds of antibiotics.  Being
a boy, it isn't so bad.  I just  know that the strep is hiding in his
sinuses, so a week after he gets off the antibiotics he gets sick again.

He slept until 800 today, and hour and a half later than usual.  I think that
must be his body healing.

He is so excited that 6 flakes of snow might fall tonight.

Paige wrote me today, said she is freezing (she's north of Austin).

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 12/12/2000 10:05 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: E-Next Generation Assignment Documents and Schedule V

I just love Lisa, she's a little bulldog isn't she.

How is Michael feeling?  It's cold outside!

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	12/12/2000 09:29 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: E-Next Generation Assignment Documents and Schedule V

Hi Suz,

Please print the exhibits and fax to me it home.

I thought you might enjoy this one.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000 09:26
AM ---------------------------

Lisa Bills
12/11/2000 11:16 PM
To: "Bunk, Sean" <seanbunk@akllp.com>
cc: <lisa.bills@enron.com>, <catherine.clark@enron.com>,
<kay.mann@enron.com>, <sheila.tweed@enron.com>,
<roseann.engeldorf@enron.com>, <mgocker@enron.com>, <sarah.wesner@enron.com>,
<toxley@winston.com>, <mmckay@velaw.com>, "Taylor, Rob"
<robtaylor@akllp.com>, "Popplewell, Tom" <tompopplewell@akllp.com>

Subject: Re: E-Next Generation Assignment Documents and Schedule V

why does LM6000 contract still have brackets around the number of turbines to
be assigned to WestLB?  Why does it still ignore the change orders rose asked
you to include?

why does schedule v to PA still ignore the change orders to the various
documents?

Please correct or advise why requests for changes are NOT being made.

As you know,  these documents are deliverables on Wednesday.  Blue Dog had
comments from the other side today.  Why haven't I seen a revision or been
asked if I agree with their comments?

Please do not operate in a vacuum without consulting me or Roseon
questionable issues.

Regards,  Lisa

"Bunk, Sean" <seanbunk@akllp.com> on 12/11/2000 07:46:53 PM
To: <lisa.bills@enron.com>, <catherine.clark@enron.com>,
<kay.mann@enron.com>, <sheila.tweed@enron.com>,
<roseann.engeldorf@enron.com>, <mgocker@enron.com>, <sarah.wesner@enron.com>,
<toxley@winston.com>, <mmckay@velaw.com>
cc: "Taylor, Rob" <robtaylor@akllp.com>, "Popplewell, Tom"
<tompopplewell@akllp.com>

Subject: E-Next Generation Assignment Documents and Schedule V

Attached please find revised drafts of the following documents:

1.  Purchase Option Assignment and Assumption Agreement (LM6000)
2.  Purchase Option Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Pastoria)
3.  Schedule V to Participation Agreement

Both a clean copy and a copy blacklined to show the changes from the
prior version are included for each of these documents.

Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or comments.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sean Bunk
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
600 Travis St., Suite 4200
Houston, Texas  77002
Tel.:  713.220.4427
Fax.: 713.238.7252
e-mail: seanbunk@andrews-kurth.com

This e-mail is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the
recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
(i) do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents hereof to others
(any of the foregoing being strictly prohibited), (ii) notify the sender
immediately of your receipt hereof, and (iii) delete this e-mail and all
copies of it.

 <<Blackline 593717v3 to v2 (Pastoria Assignment).DOC>>  <<Purchase
Option Assignment and Assumption Agreement - Pastoria.DOC>>  <<Blackline
593834v4 to v3 (LM6000 Assignment - N.A.).DOC>>  <<Purchase Option
Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Turbopark - LM6000).DOC>>
<<Schedule V to Participation Agreement (TurboPark).DOC>>  <<Blackline
597234v2 to v1 (Sched. V - Turbo Park).DOC>>
 - Blackline 593717v3 to v2 (Pastoria Assignment).DOC
 - Purchase Option Assignment and Assumption Agreement - Pastoria.DOC
 - Blackline 593834v4 to v3 (LM6000 Assignment - N.A.).DOC
 - Purchase Option Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Turbopark -
LM6000).DOC
 - Schedule V to Participation Agreement (TurboPark).DOC
 - Blackline 597234v2 to v1 (Sched. V - Turbo Park).DOC


NEMEC, GERALD R,
?
You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance
Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process,
and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance
Management goals.
?
To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and
select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing
feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed
by Friday, May 25, 2001.
?
If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com
?
Thank you for your participation in this important process.
?
The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL
RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.
?
Employee Name:
KIANI-ASLANI, JOHN
KNIPPA, MARK


The next AB 1890 Implementation Group meeting will be:

NOTE TIME/LOCATION CHANGE

TUESDAY AUGUST 22ND
1:30 PM -- 5:30 PM
CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE -- CONFERENCE ROOM
1215 K STREET, 14TH FLOOR

PLEASE RSVP BY EMAIL OR PHONE

As always, please contact us if you have any questions or concerns or would
like to add an issue to the agenda.

Thanks,
Delaney Hunter
Legislative Director
Smith & Kempton
(916) 446-5508


I will send these as I find them.  This is the detail I sent to Jeff for the
April 2000 manual invoice.  It looks like the only deals that should have
been suspended are the citygate CGAS sales.

Line 7 under the "Manual Invoice" tab applies to deal 268094, volume of
615600 at $3.1279, sale to CES for Proxy storage injections.
Line 6 applies to deals 227081 and 227113, sales to CES at the citygate.
Line 8 shows the incremental transport expense ENA incurred to allow CES to
swing.  Today I would take this expense and add it to the sales price on
deals 227081 and 227113.
Line 9????  I still can't figure out what I did here.

I think everything else is sorta clear.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000
12:29 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@Btu.net> on 12/01/2000 05:15:39 PM
To: "Btu's Weekly Power Report" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu's Weekly Power Report

Attached is the latest issue of Btu's Weekly Power Report

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wp120400.pdf


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	 Staff Mtg. Conference room EB4102

Date:		7/23/2001
Time:		10:30 AM - 1:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Still no fix.

Kevin Presto
East Power Trading
Phone:  713-853-5035
Cell:  713-854-3923
Fax:  713-646-8272


In the event that you need copies of EES agreements, please contact Karen Cordova at X33150.

Travis C. McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 824
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax:      (713) 646-8860

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:08 PM
To:	Aronowitz, Alan; Clark, Morris; Davis, Angela; Del vecchio, Peter; Douglas, Stephen H.; Evans, Mark (London Legal); Gray, Barbara N.; Hansen, Leslie; Heard, Marie; Hendry, Brent; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Jones, Tana; Koehler, Anne C.; Leite, Francisco Pinto; McCullough, Travis; Murphy, Harlan; Murray, Julia; Nemec, Gerald; Sager, Elizabeth; Sayre, Frank; Shackleton, Sara; Simons, Paul; St. Clair, Carol; Van Hooser, Steve; Viverito, John
Cc:	Cook, Mary; Rohauer, Tanya
Subject:	Credit Contact

Please be advised that Jay Williams will be our credit contact for all master netting agreement credit terms.  Jay will also provide us with all counterparty names and maintain the list of agreements.  Jay's phone number is (713) 345-3923 and, for e-mail purposes, he is listed as Williams, Jason R. (Credit).


FUNDS TRANSFER.

Compliments of the day to you.

I wish to extend this mutual business proposal to you with the hope that you will accept. I am the principal auditor of Department of Petroleum Resources.  In the course of discharging my duty last year, I discovered an over invoiced contract payment due for payment to a foreign contractor.

I am writing you to seek your assistance and collaboration to enable me use my position in Government to secure the approval for the payment of this over invoiced contract claim to your bank account.   This particular contract was awarded to a Foreign Contractor and was over estimated to the tune of US$36,561,000.00 (Thirty Six Million, Five Hundred and Sixty one Thousand US Dollars Only). The foreign Contractor has received full payment for the actual contract value, leaving behind the sum of US$36,561,000.00 which represents the over estimated contract valuE
Currently lying at the Central Bank of Nigeria. The over estimated value of $36,561,000.00 was meant to be a Kick Back to the Government officials that awarded the contract. These Government officials have been removed from office and they had no chance of collecting the money before leaving office. As a result of updated payment advise at the Central
Bank, it has been awaiting transfer to a Foreign Account.

Having done all the necessary groundwork, this money is now in our possession and I am looking for a trustworthy person into whose private or company's account this money would be transferred.

Upon the transfer of this money, 70% of the sum will be for me, 25% shall be for you the account owner, while the remaining 5% shall be set aside to refund expenses made in the course of this transaction. Be assured that this business is safe  but the keyword is the confidentiality, due to the nature of the transaction and my position in the ministry.

Kindly treat as urgent.

Yours faithfully,

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


I invited Jim S.

I was assuming that Paul would facilitate.  Paul can you make this meeting? If not Paul, I was assuming it would be Sue or you.

Here's my  suggested Agenda

1. Clarify scope of meeting.  Calif. coverage or the entire West?

2. GA staff goes down the list of key cases that affect the curve (T, D, and utility G) and identifies who's covering cases

3. URM gives feedback on areas of their curves that may not be in GA's "radar"

4. Discussion over which cases should be monitoring mode and which we should be advocating a position.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 2:55 PM
To:	Comnes, Alan; Mara, Susan
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: See you Thursday
Importance:	High

Alan:
Two things.  1) Assuming that you're lead on the meeting (i.e., agenda, facilitate meeting)---if not, just let us know and we'll take the reins.  2) Seems appropriate to invite Jim to participate.  Sure he'll be interested.  Your call.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Comnes, Alan
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 4:49 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Alamo, Joseph
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: See you Thursday

Joseph,

Can you work with Sue and set up a call for Wed.  afternoon.  Perhaps the same call could be our weekly meeting since Sue and Jeff are tied up on Thurs.

GAC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 10:49 AM
To:	Comnes, Alan; Mara, Susan
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: See you Thursday
Importance:	High

Oh dear.  Get a story straight?  That's moving the bar pretty darned high, ain't it?  Wednesday looks good for me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Comnes, Alan
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 12:31 PM
To:	Mara, Susan
Cc:	Dasovich, Jeff; Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: See you Thursday

My recollections is that Paul wanted a meeting before meeting with commercial folks to "get our story straight."  Can you set that up? Wed afternoon would work for me.

GAC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mara, Susan
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Richter, Jeff; Swain, Steve
Cc:	Dasovich, Jeff; Kaufman, Paul; Comnes, Alan
Subject:	See you Thursday

Jeff and I are still planning to thumb our noses at the terrorists and fly up there on Thursday morning.  We were planning on a 10 am to 2 pm meeting, working through lunch. Does this sound good to you two?


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042419.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 19 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 19 / Preferred:   2.41 / Final:   2.32)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


I pulled it up, but the fields need some explaining,  give me a call at your conveneince to walk me thru.

c

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Will
Sent:	Monday, July 09, 2001 11:28 AM
To:	Semperger, Cara
Subject:	RE: Testing Preschedule workspace

Yes, but Vish made the changes in Table Edit.  : - )

Will

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara
Sent:	Monday, July 09, 2001 1:20 PM
To:	Smith, Will
Subject:	RE: Testing Preschedule workspace

So, this table edit that Brett is asking me to test is really from you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Will
Sent:	Monday, July 09, 2001 11:08 AM
To:	Semperger, Cara; Atta, Asem
Cc:	Bentley, Corry; Poston, David
Subject:	RE: Testing Preschedule workspace

Cara,

We have recently added to Table Edit the ability to create aliases for counterparties.  Also you should be able to add extended information about each counterparty.  The tab in Table Edit is "Counterparty Extensions" and when you select New...

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>

Try creating a few aliases and see if they work.  Because the process takes so long, you might limit it to a small number of Paths.  In the meantime, we will be looking into why the process is slow.

Regards,
Will

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara
Sent:	Monday, July 09, 2001 12:52 PM
To:	Smith, Will; Atta, Asem
Cc:	Bentley, Corry; Poston, David
Subject:	FW: Testing Preschedule workspace

When I sent this e-mail,  the Workspace error log popped up,  the total running time for the 70 rows of path confirmation was 1 hour 30 minutes, and the rows that were not confirmed were ignored due to the Aliases that Schedulers use.

c

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara
Sent:	Monday, July 09, 2001 10:40 AM
To:	Smith, Will; Atta, Asem
Cc:	Bentley, Corry; Poston, David
Subject:	Testing Preschedule workspace

Good Morning,

My target testing date today is June 18th,  I am running in Test P in Local Enpower using actual data from our scheduling sheets re-arranged to meet the new guidelines.

The daily deals I coded X in columns J and N,  the Month long bookouts and BOM bookouts I coded R.

What worked:

I was able to retrieve my saved workspace with all data intact. I had previously sucessfully copied and pasted my entire sheet from EXCEL to the PSW.

I was able to run the build route report with the criteria of "Starting On- June 18-PaloVerde-Day of week Mask Activated-Report Changes activated." A check of deals actually scheduled vs. build route results showed that all deals were extracted correctly from Enpower. Because I am working on closed dates, a cumulative test of this app will not be fully testable until production. We are expecting to see the same functionality as the current incarnation of Build route. The data extracted should be read only, time stamped, and when run mulitple times additional data should be shown below previously extracted data.  The improvement we are expecting to see is the app should not duplicate deal strips on dates that have no physical power flow. (West Light Load currently does this in Start view, but not Active view)

Navigating around the scheduling sheet itself I was able to accurately execute the sort function on a single criteria at a time. Multiple sorting will contunue to be done in excel, or we can do a series of single sorts in the PSW to acheive the same result.

Routing deals: Will had deleted all routes for June 18th, starting me with a clean slate.  I made every path be for DAY. I was unable to confirm total unrouted MWH, as the real time position manager does not seem to be functioning in TESTP. The routing appeared to take 19 minutes with the status bar showing steady progress during that time. This time is 15-17 minutes longer than current speed using the Excel Macro system we have now. The error list gave me a row by row description of what did not route, a very useful tool.  OK was visible on all rows that the PSW believed that it had routed. I had difficulty checking the routing results, as I kept getting BDE errors in Scheduling after routing had occurred (Local Enpower). Scheduling kept starting up in 1899.  I was unable to login to TestP through Terminal server 2, but was able to in Terminal Server 5. The results there were very encouraging! Most routing was done, and a spot check of deals shows that they were routed properly. The deals that were not routed appear to be due to a user error of deal number duplication in the sheet. This is consistent with what I would expect. I will further evaluate routing ability with our more complicated paths later. This routing was very easy, a large point with on peak non shaped deals only.

Things I did not expect that I liked:

When I highlight a group of cells in Build Route, it stays highlighted when I move up to the scheduling sheet to highlight a comparison group of cells.  This is very handy for double checking Build route against the scheduler's sheet.

What does not appear to be working at this time:

The physical or not physical flag of path does not seem to be showing up properly in routing.

Path Confirmation:  The running time appeared to be over one hour for one sheet, only 70 rows of the sheet being flagged for insertion into confirmation. This current speed will not be sufficient to work in production. Also, many rows that were flagged for confirmation were not imported, and I cannot find an error log to help understand why deals were not imported to path confirmation.
When the path confirmation task was finished,  the application simply froze.  The status bar was no longer visible, leading me to believe that it was done, however the app was not able to be saved or closed or examined further.

My conclusions:

The build route and routing functions work well enough to use in production, the copy-paste function works well for the West desk per our connectivity issues.

Path Confirmation is not functioning at this point, and appears to be blowing up the app. No data was visible for June 18th even after the PSW ran through its import function.

Please let me know when the issues I have named have been addressed and are ready for further testing.

Thanks

Cara
503/464-3814


Everyone,

You probably have already heard on the news that there is a new Computer Virus out on the internet that is causing Corporations to experience numerous problems.  We have an automated process to update our workstations with the latest virus protection updates.   However, there may be some machines that didn't get the update.  In order to prevent this virus from infecting your machine, please assist by doing one of the following tasks.

1.  Logout of the network and log back in or
2.  Click on START>PROGRAMS>ACCESSORIES>Norton AntiVirus Corporate Edition and then click the Live Update button.  This will pop up a screen where you will have to click the "Next" button and then a "Finish" button.

The proper version of the update pattern you need is:   (9/18/2001, version 30918v)

If you have questions or concerns, please direct them to your Resolution Center.

Enron Global Technology


You are the Prearranged bidder for offer 50153 between Enron North America Corporation
 and Boston Gas Company.  This deal has been posted.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 09/13/2000 11:05
AM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 09/13/2000 06:00:59 AM
To: chris.booth@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Shipping dates for optional equipment on Change order

Chris,

Below, is the confirmed shipment dates for the change order equipment that
you currently have on order with us.

A couple of these (modular control room, 50 ft and retrofit to add Power
System Stabilizer to generator) need new line items in Exhibit N-2 when
writing up the change order.

Thanks,

Lee
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 2:24 PM
> To: Storm, Michael E (PS, SSEP)
> Cc: Martin, David C (PS, SSEP)
> Subject: Shipping dates for optional equipment on Change order
>
>
> Mike/David,
>
> Here's the run down on Ready to Ship (RTS) dates for the change order
> equipment that I show for Enron:
>
> 1. Exhaust stack, 45 ft standard; quantity 4; RTS 10/30/00  (Enron ordered
> via memo to David Davis on March 6, 2000)
> 2.a. Exhaust stack, 45 ft heavy; quantity 4; RTS 10/30/00  (Enron ordered
> via memo to David Davis on March 6, 2000)
>    b. Exhaust stack, 45 ft heavy; quantity 4; RTS 2/28/01
>    c. Extensions to 90 ft. for 8 heavy wall stacks; quantity 8; RTS
> 2/28/01, (price $ 89,000 each extension)
> 3.Modular control building, 50'; quantity 4; 2xRTS 2/28/01 & 2xRTS 3/30/01
> 4. Unit Motor control Centers; quantity 8; 4xRTS 2/28/01 & 4xRTS 3/30/01
> 5. Chiller modules, quantity 8; 2xRTS 10/30/00 (Enron ordered via memo to
> David Davis 3/6/00)
> 3xRTS 2/28/01 & 3xRTS 3/30/01
> 6. Cooling towers, quantity 8; 4 x RTS 2/28/01, 4 x RTS 3/30/01
> 7. Power system stabilizers, ($ 31,875 per unit), 4xRTS 2/28/01, 4xRTS
> 3/30/01
>
> I need you to confirm by Monday AM, so I can forward on dates to Chris
> Booth to finish the Change Order.
>
> Lee
>


Thank you for using our automated self service password reset option.

The user id and password in SAP (Apollo Production and HR Production), eHRonline, iBuyit and iPayit are all synchronized.  When you reset your password in eHRonline, it automatically synchronizes the password in the other systems.

Please follow the steps to reset and synchronize your passwords.

1.        Go to ehronline.enron.com
2.       Click on the   button
3.       Enter your User Id (SAP Personnel Number) and temporary password (located at the bottom of this email)
4.       You will then be asked to change your password
5.       Enter your new password twice
6.       Once you have successfully changed your password in eHRonline, you have synchronized your password for SAP (Apollo Production and HR Production), eHRonline, iBuyit and iPayit
7.       If you were trying to access an application other than eHRonline, close eHRonline and proceed to the desired application.  You will now be able to log in with your NEW password.

 THIS IS A GENERATED EMAIL - DO NOT REPLY!

IF YOU NEED FURTHER ASSISTANCE, CONTACT THE ISC HELP DESK AT:  713-345-4727

The password for your account: P00503932   has been reset to: 12276362

Go to eHRonline now: http://ehronline.enron.com <https://ehronline.enron.com/>


Jeff, this morning I spoke with Reliant's regulatory counsel, who called me
after talking with Lee Hart, and who seemed eager to look into drafting a
filing.  I would be happy to talk with Leonard Foster or June Suwara at
Sempra about doing the same, but somehow think Sempra might be a tougher
customer (don't know why I would think that...).  My suggestion is that we
work through Ms. Katz initially.  Anticipating that we might encounter some
inertia at Sempra's regulatory dept. -- and to give you an outline to work
from when talking to Stefanie -- I put together the attached rough draft of a
motion to intervene and motion to expedite to be filed by Sempra.

Feel free to send the attached to Stefanie.  However, please do so with the
caveat that you are sending it for discussion purposes only, not as legal
advice to Sempra from ET&S's legal department, and the content of this
pleading should ultimately be up to Sempra's legal/regulatory staff.

Reliant's counsel said he'd be sending me a draft of his pleading...if I
don't hear from him within a reasonable time I'll call to follow up.


Tom, I would like to attend lunch.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tom Shelton                           06/15/99 08:42 AM

To: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen W Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald
Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geriann Warner@Enron, Mark
Papa/EOG/Enron@Enron, William Rome/OTS/Enron@Enron, Andy L
Unverzagt/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Tonsall/OTS/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Tony Garza visit

Chairman Garza's visit to Houston will be on June 23, but it may be at
another downtown company (perhaps Exxon?) instead of Enron.  If you want to
attend the "tour" and/or the lunch, let me know ASAP.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT on 06/15/99 08:39 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tom Shelton                           06/08/99 11:37 AM

To: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen W Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald
Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Geriann Warner@Enron, Mark Papa/EOG/Enron@Enron, William
Rome/OTS/Enron@Enron, Andy L Unverzagt/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Tonsall/OTS/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Tony Garza visit

 The Pipeline Joint Defense Group/TECALA, of which HPL is a member, has
invited Texas Railroad Commission Chairman Tony Garza to come to Houston to
meet with the group.   I have tentatively offered to include as part of the
meeting a tour of the Enron Gas Control Room (can you do that, James?) for
Chairman Garza and a small number of people from the Group (maybe about a
dozen).  We would like a larger number of representatives from companies
which are members of the Group to attend the general informal discussion with
Chairman Garza, probably at either the Enron Building, The Met, or otherwise
nearby.  Tentative dates are June 23 and June 30, probably in the middle of
the day with lunch.
 Please let me know whether or not you would like to attend the meeting, and
if so what date(s) work for you, and I will pass the information on to Roxann
Neumann, who is coordinating the meeting.  If you think any others would like
to attend, give me a call (36417) or cc:mail.


Subject: Access Card Information

Dear Colleagues,

We know you have many questions about your new benefits plan, payroll issues and other changes that will occur over the next few weeks. Human Resources and Communications are preparing a thorough Q&A, which we will send to you tomorrow and will regularly update as more information is available.

Meanwhile, please read the announcement below from Security about how you can obtain a new UBS Warburg access card that will allow you to enter our new office space after Friday.

I am confident that you share my enthusiasm about our new opportunity.  We look forward to working along side each of you in the coming days.

David Oxley
Human Resources
____________________________________________________________________

Access Cards

There will be a two-day transition for the new UBS Warburg access cards. Beginning Monday, February 11, access to the 5th and 6th floors of Enron Center South will require these new cards. UBS Warburg access cards can be picked up from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. at the reception area on the 5th floor of Enron Center South on Thursday, February 7th ; Friday, February 8th ; and Monday, February 11. Enron Security will produce new access cards with existing photographs, then simultaneously issue the new and collect the old cards. Employees without UBS Warburg cards will be allowed into the Enron Center South building on Monday but will have to collect their new cards as soon as possible to gain access to the 5th and 6th floors.

Employees who fail to collect their new cards by 7 p.m. Monday will be required to contact Enron Security's general information number at 713-853-5360 to arrange to pick them up.

There will be security staff available at the pick up point on ECS 5 to help with any problems you might have.

It is suggested employees wear their access cards at all times while on the premise.

Accessible Areas - The new cards will allow UBS-W employees to enter:
5th & 6th floors and Plaza area of Enron Center South ,
The Sky Ring
Body Shop, Enron Center North Plaza and therefore access the Credit Union and Cafeteria from either building.

Restricted Areas - Employees must submit to Enron Security a Restricted Access Request form (available by calling 713 8535360 ) and signed by Bob McAuliffe (713-853-7468) to enter:
Enron Center South, 8th and 9th floors
Enron Center North, 22nd and 34th floor
Ardmore Data Center.

Employees staying with the Enron estate while visa and other issues are completed - Employees in this group who are on assignment arrangements to UBS-W will be issued a regular access card - available in the same way as other new UBS-W employees.

Estate employees who are working with UBS-W on transition issues  - If they will be based in UBS-W office space they should talk to their UBS-W counterpart for approval and then UBSW HR for the issue of a UBS-W contractor card (in addition to their regular Enron badge).


Here is the link you wanted - click it

http://207.21.194.106/enron1/


Just a heads up from Chris Foster -

---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/18/2001 11:47 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Chris H Foster                           04/17/2001 12:17 PM

To: Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT@ECT, John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stanley
Cocke/PDX/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lester Rawson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Anna
Mehrer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: APX Deal Confirms

The APX called me today.  They are concerned we are sending them confirms on
deals that we are doing with them.  Legally this is incorrect as we are
transacting purusuant to the APX Master, not the Enron Master.  So, please
try to remember to check the box for no confirms when you transact with the
APX.

C


The volume on deal # 138550, North Central Oil Corporation, has been revised
from 14,500 to 15,000/d effective 11/1/00.

Bob


By its January 8 order, the FERC clarified that it did not intend to preclude
the PX from engaging in bilateral forward contracting  and that the PX was
free to remove spot market components from its forward contracting rate
scheduling.  In its request for rehearing, the PX argued that: (1) FERC had
failed to fix a just and reasonable rate, (2) FERC did not remove the ongoing
prohibition on the IOUs trading in its markets, (3) the January 8 order
prohibited it from operating a spot market and that prohibition was unduly
discriminatory, and (4) FERC failed to provide a viable alternative to its
forward market rate schedule.  FERC dismissed the PX's request for rehearing
of its January 8 order, finding that all of the PX's concerns emanate from
the FERC's December 15 order not its January 8 order..   See attached order.
- EL00-95.1


you still at school?  call me at work.


Steve,
Not a bad move for NEM.

I got it at 17.5 when the option was exercised against me.

Vince

Steve Bigalow@ENRON
04/27/2001 08:11 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 4/27

good morning,  strong open today. You can buy your NEM and  AU. However, I
will be glad to debate the point of whether inflation will be a problem for
the foreseeable future.

Buy ATSN and ACTU on open

Steve


Mark-

IBJ certainly appears to want us to move rapidly towards closure on our
documentation.  Please inform me as to what I can do to facilitate and
expedite matters.

Jonathan-

Inform me if you would like me to respond to IBJ's correspondence, or
alternatively if you will be responding.

Thanks,

John
----- Forwarded by John Viverito/Corp/Enron on 09/05/2000 02:43 AM -----

	"Yamato Konishi" <yamato.konishi@ibjbank.co.jp>
	09/05/2000 01:33 AM

		 To: <Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com>, <John.Viverito@enron.com>
		 cc: "Tom Bruce-Jones" <Tom.Bruce-Jones@enron.com>,
<Steven.Kleege@enron.com>, "Maeda san" <kazunobu.maeda@ibjbank.co.jp>,
"hiroshi.matsui" <hiroshi.matsui@ibjbank.co.jp>
		 Subject: Before Lumber trade between Enron Japan and IBJ Tokyo

Dear Sirs

IBJ is now accelerating setting credit line for Enron Japan.
So we need some financial statement(incl. information of investment ratio)
of Enron Japan itself ASAP(by this week).
Of course, we know that 100% guarantee from Enron Corp is necessary.

Please be advised that not to miss a good chance to trade,
I believe that each of us must be completely ready for actual trade by next
Monday.

Regarding ISDA, we are looking for hear comments about amended draft that we
sent back.
And now I'm also asking the sample confirmation of "Lumber Cap" for
Mr.Steven Kleege in Houston.

If any question, please feel free to contact me.
And I very much appreciate if you kindly show me another good idea to settle
above rapidly.

Best regards,
Konishi
**************************************
  Yamato Konishi

  Industrial Bank of Japan, Ltd
  Derivatives & Fixed Income Dep.
  Phone:81-3-3214-1008
  Fax:81-3-3215-6247
  E-mail:yamato.konishi@ibjbank.co.jp
**************************************


no plans yet - italian festival is this weekend in downtown so looking forward to that on saturday afternoon but no other plans.  no plans for tonight but sure we are available for food and drinks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Miller [mailto:rob@ramind.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:19 PM
To: Cuilla, Martin
Subject:

hey marty what are u up to this weekend?


I understand from Mark that in order to open up the utilities to trade
financial, we will need to amend the GTC's to add some additional reps and
provisions.  Do you have a timetable for when we will be able to do that?


Twanda,

Would you please juggle the rest of my calendar to accommodate this?  I've
got two meetings at that time to reschedule -- try Wednesday, or with Amy on
Tuesday morning.  Thanks a lot!

Michelle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.
----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 06/23/2000 04:08 PM -----

	Ana Alcantara
	06/23/2000 03:46 PM

		 To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesus
Melendrez/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Douglas B Dunn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dina
Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Deborah J Edison/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Mariner Meeting - June 27, 2000

This is to confirm the time, place and attendees for the meeting w/Mariner:

Subject: Change of Control Agreement

Date:   Tuesday, June 27th

 Time: 1:30pm - 5:00pm

 Place: EB 27C2

Attendees:
ENA - Brad Dunn, Michelle Cash, Lance Schuler, Jesus Melendrez
Mariner - Hunt Hodge, Mike Strickler, Kelly Zelikovic, Bob Henderson

Thank you,
Ana x35737