---------------------- Forwarded by Amy Fabian/Corp/Enron on 05/22/2000 04:27
PM ---------------------------

Sally Painter <SPainter@fontheiminternational.com>@fontheiminternational.com>
on 05/22/2000 05:30:42 PM
Sent by: Rhonda Russell <RRussell@fontheiminternational.com>
To: "'Amy, Enron'" <amy.fabian@enron.com>, "'Amy, Enron'"
<amy.fabian@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: e-mails to be forwarded to Steve Kean

Amy, thanks for all of your help!

 <<FW: Gore2000 TPs: Social Security, South Africa, the NRA and Bush's
leadership>>  <<FW: Gore2000 TPs: Bush's SS plan hurts women>>  <<Read:
Today's Post Story About Gore Campaign>>  <<RE: Gore2000 TPs: Bush's
Secret Plan for Social Security Revealed!>>  <<FW: Gore2000 TPs: Bush's
Secret Plan for Social Security Revealed!>>

________________________________________________________________________
_
Rhonda Russell
Fontheim International. LLC
601 Thirteenth Street NW
Suite 1100North
Washington, DC 20005
202.879-5821

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <13EB2E1A97CAD311BB9200508B8FA56E04CE41@FONTHEIM_SERVER>
From: Sally Painter <SPainter@fontheiminternational.com>
To: Rhonda Russell <RRussell@fontheiminternational.com>
Subject: FW: Gore2000 TPs: Social Security, South Africa, the NRA and Bush 's
leadership
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:11:23 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dear All,

Please let me know if you find these useful or would prefer that I
screen for content.  Thanks.

Best,

Sally

Gore2000 Talking Points
Monday, May 22, 2000

?    Gore focuses on Social Security
?    Gore meets with South African President Thabo Mbeki
?    The NRA guns for the presidency
?    Houston Chronicle columnist Donald Kaul on Bush's Texas Leadership

GORE FOCUSES ON SOCIAL SECURITY, CHINA TRADE

Speaking in Washington today, Al Gore called for Social Security reform
that preserves the basic guarantee of retirement security.  The Gore
plan
will keep Social Security solvent through at least 2050, while Bush is
pushing a risky privatization scheme.  Under the Bush plan, poor
investment
choices by some individuals or a downturn in the stock market could
force
taxpayers to bailout those who lost money.

GORE MEETS WITH SOUTH AFRICAN PRESIDENT THABO MBEKI

At a State Department luncheon, Al Gore met with South African President
Thabo Mbeki to discuss trade, the AIDS epidemic, and other concerns with
the African subcontinent.  Gore has proposed strengthening economic
engagement with Africa, which will lead to greater prosperity and
international security.

George Bush, however, takes a dim view of Africa, stating Africa
"doesn't
fit into the national strategic interests, as far as I can seen them."
[PBS
"NewsHour" 2/16/00]

THE NRA GUNS FOR THE PRESIDENCY

Meeting in Charlotte this weekend, Charlton Heston fired up the faithful
with fear and belligerence, telling Al Gore and other "divisive forces"
(gun safety advocates) that they could have his guns when they take them
"from my cold dead hands."

Wayne LaPierre, NRA Executive VP, attacked the Million Mom March,
instead
calling last week's rally of concerned parents, the "Misled Mom March."

Reaffirming that Governor Bush is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the NRA,
top
officials declared they would throw all of the group's resources behind
the
Texas Governor.

HOUSTON CHRONICLE QUESTIONS BUSH'S LEADERSHIP

On Saturday, Houston Chronicle columnist Donald Kaul questioned Bush's
leadership, explaining "he has spent his life being rescued for his
family's rich friends from one failed business deal after another."

Among Kaul's criticisms of Mr. Bush:

Texas ranks near the tops of the charts in every bad category:
?    poverty rates, teen pregnancies, people without insurance, air
pollution, executions
Texas ranks near the bottom in all the good categories:
?    the environment, public health, parks and recreation, highways and
support for the arts

The one place where Bush has shown leadership is in working tirelessly
to
cut state taxes of the well-to-do.
?    He has protected the oil refiners which dump 1 million tons of
pollution into the Texas air annually
?    He pushed a $1.2 billion property tax cut, despite the fact that
Texas
schools are starved for cash

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I Support Al Gore for President!
http://www.algore2000.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
income
tax purposes.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I Support Al Gore for President!
http://www.algore2000.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
income
tax purposes.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <13EB2E1A97CAD311BB9200508B8FA56E04CE32@FONTHEIM_SERVER>
From: Sally Painter <SPainter@fontheiminternational.com>
To: Rhonda Russell <RRussell@fontheiminternational.com>
Subject: FW: Gore2000 TPs: Bush's SS plan hurts women
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 17:58:26 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dear all,

FYI

Gore 2000 Talking Points
Thursday, May 18, 2000

?    Bush's Social Security plan would hurt women
?    Required Reading: NYT Herbert ? "Are You Feeling Lucky?"

BUSH'S SOCIAL SECURITY PLAN WOULD HURT WOMEN

?    Women Would Be the "Largest Group of Losers" Under Privatization.
John Mueller, the Senior Vice President and Chief Economist of Lehrman
Bell
Mueller Cannon, Inc. and former adviser to Rep. Jack Kemp, testified
before
the House Social Security Subcommittee that "the largest group of losers
from 'privatizing' Social Security would be women.  This is true for
women
in all birth-years, all kinds of marital status, all kinds of
labor-market
behavior, and all income levels."

?    Privatization Plans Exacerbate the Already Unequal Distribution of
Retirement Benefits.  According to the statement of Jane Ross, Director
of
Income Security issues at the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO),
Social
Security reform plans that incorporate private accounts exacerbate the
already unequal distribution of retirement benefits under Social
Security.
["Social Security Reform: Implications for the Financial Well-Being of
Women," Statement of Jane L. Ross, GAO, 4/10/97]

?    Privatization Plans a Threat to Women's Long-Term Security.
Privatization would transform today's  guaranteed retirement benefits
into
a risky program that could threaten women's retirement security, since
women are more likely to rely on Social Security for their primary
source
of retirement benefits.

?    Women rely on Social Security because
(1)  half of all women work in jobs that don't offer pensions;
(2)  women retirees with pensions receive half the average pensions
benefits that men collect;
(3)  nearly three out of four women earn less than $30,000 a year. Women
&
Retirement Security: An Overview," WISER,
     3/10/00, "Viewpoint: Legislative Agenda for the 106th Congress,
"Social Security Privatization," National Committee to
     Preserve Social Security and Medicare, "Women and Retirement
Security," www.ssa.gov]

HERBERT FROM TODAY'S NYT: DO YOU FEEL LUCKY?

Bob Herbert today deconstructed the various arguments for why Bush's
privatization scheme is too risky.

1) Even his chief economic advisor doesn't trust the market:

"Mr. Lindsey, who strongly favors Mr. Bush's proposed $1.3 trillion tax
cut
and argues that it would provide a needed economic stimulus, has warned
his
private clients of a potential stock market tailspin that could lead to
a
recession. He said he sold his own stocks about two years ago so he
would
be able "to sleep at night."

Mr. Bush told the nation that the key to saving Social Security
retirement
benefits was to allow working Americans to invest a portion of their
Social
Security taxes in the very same stock market that Mr. Lindsey, at the
moment, wants no part of."

2) Herbert also questioned Bush's motives, noting that Bush's Wall
Street
contributors would make out like bandits under his plan.

"There is, however, a group of guaranteed winners under Mr. Bush's plan
--
the movers and shakers at the big brokerage houses who have been
funneling
many millions of dollars into the campaign coffers of Mr. Bush and other
politicians, just begging them to steer some of the hundreds of billions
of
dollars in Social Security taxes their way.

Everyone who sells stocks or mutual funds stands to benefit from this
welfare scheme for the not-so-idle rich.

3) He explained the chronology of Republicans trying to do away with
Social
Security

"Face it, the Republicans have had it in for Social Security since its
inception. The historian William Manchester wrote about the G.O.P.'s
desperate efforts in 1936 to block its creation: "On radio spots, actors
hired by the Republican National Committee revealed in shocked tones
that
each man would be given a number -- as though there were any other way
to
keep track of Social Security accounts -- and perpetrated the hoax that
people would be fingerprinted."

When the Republicans won control of Congress in 1946, party leaders
called
for the repeal of Social Security. And nearly four decades later,
Governor
Bush's fellow Texan, Senator Phil Gramm, could be quoted as follows on
the
question of eliminating minimum benefits for the elderly:

"They are 80-year-olds. Most people don't have the luxury of living to
be
80 years old, so it's hard for me to feel sorry for them."

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I Support Al Gore for President!
http://www.algore2000.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
income
tax purposes.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I Support Al Gore for President!
http://www.algore2000.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
income
tax purposes.
Message-ID: <13EB2E1A97CAD311BB9200508B8FA56E01C4A3@FONTHEIM_SERVER>
From: Sally Painter <SPainter@fontheiminternational.com>
Subject: Read: Today's Post Story About Gore Campaign
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 11:24:22 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3)
Content-Type: text/plain

Your message

  To:      Claude Fontheim; 'David Milenthal'; 'Frank Cipriano'; 'Mark
Goode'; 'Morris Reid'; 'Nancy Kramer'; 'Robert Rosen'; 'Rodney
Ferguson'; Sally Painter; 'Sally Susman'; 'Samuel P. Fried'; 'Scott
Bernstein'; 'Seth Siegel'; 'Simon Rosenberg'; 'Steve Kean'; 'Tom Horton'
  Subject: FW: Today's Post Story About Gore Campaign
  Sent:    Fri, 19 May 2000 11:23:32 -0400

was read on Fri, 19 May 2000 11:24:22 -0400

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <13EB2E1A97CAD311BB9200508B8FA56E04CE21@FONTHEIM_SERVER>
From: Sally Painter <SPainter@fontheiminternational.com>
To: Rhonda Russell <RRussell@fontheiminternational.com>
Subject: RE: Gore2000 TPs: Bush's Secret Plan for Social Security Revealed !
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 08:23:28 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

good stuff there may be one today.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Rhonda Russell
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 3:56 PM
> To: Claude Fontheim; David Milenthal; Frank Cipriano; Mark Goode;
> Morris Reid; Nancy Kramer; Robert Rosen; Rodney Ferguson; Sally
> Painter; Sally Susman; Samuel P. Fried; Scott Bernstein; Seth Siegel;
> Simon Rosenberg; Steve Kean; Tom Horton
> Subject: FW: Gore2000 TPs: Bush's Secret Plan for Social Security
> Revealed!
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> It was great to see you all at the dinner.  See below.
>
> Best,
>
> Sally Painter
>
>
>
>
> Gore2000 Talking Points
> Wednesday, May 17, 2000
>
> ?    Gore challenges Bush to Social Security debate at AARP conference
> in
> Orlando
> ?    Bush's Secret Plan Revealed!
> ?    Bush continues to face fire over privatization plan
> ?    Middle and low income workers worse-off under Texas alternative
> to
> Social Security
>
> GORE CHALLENGES BUSH TO SOCIAL SECURITY DEBATE AT AARP CONFERENCE IN
> ORLANDO
>
> Addressing approximately 10,000 seniors at the AARP's Biennial
> Convention,
> Al Gore today challenged George W. Bush to hold a debate, "as soon as
> possible," on their competing Social Security proposals. Gore has
> called
> for Social Security reform "based not on stock market speculation, but
> on
> fiscal responsibility and debt reduction." Bush is pushing the partial
> privatization of Social Security, but has provided no specific
> details.
>
> BUSH WOULD COMPLETELY PRIVATIZE  SOCIAL SECURITY
>
> George Bush has revealed that his "secret plan" for Social Security is
> an
> attempt to completely dismantle and privatize the 65-year system of
> social
> insurance, according to reports in the New York Times, the Associated
> Press, and the Houston Chronicle.
>
> The Chronicle reports that "Republican presidential candidate George
> W.
> Bush on Tuesday said his plan to create private savings accounts could
> be
> the first step toward a complete privatization of Social Security."
>
> "It's going to take a while to transition to a system where personal
> savings accounts are the predominant part of the investment vehicle,"
> Bush
> said. "This is a step toward a completely different world, and an
> important
> step."
>
> Bush admits that the individual private accounts are but the first
> step in
> his larger plan to privatize the program.  This may be good for the
> stockbrokers who have poured $3 million into his Presidential
> campaign, but
> it is a horrible deal for America.
>
> BUSH PLAN PANNED IN THE PRESS
>
> Bush's privatization plan has come under fire from responsible
> journalists
> and editorial pages across the country.
>
> A New York Daily News editorial writes:
> "On the future of Social Security, the presidential candidates have
> offered
> stark choices. Bush would destroy the program; Gore would save it.
> Easy
> choice."
>
> Paul Krugman addresses the current concern about the stock market
> being
> overvalued at present:
> "If you think that stocks are currently overpriced, this [the Bush]
> proposal sounds like a recipe for disaster: it will encourage workers
> to
> buy stocks at exactly the wrong time -- eventually leading to an even
> worse
> Social Security crisis, as the government finds itself under intense
> pressure to bail out the baby boomers."
>
> TEXAS ALTERNATIVE TO SOCIAL SECURITY HURTS RETIREES
>
> The Baltimore Sun today revealed that three Texas counties which opted
> out
> of the Social Security system in the early 1980s in favor of private
> investments.  According to the Sun, many of the counties' 3,000
> employees ?
> especially low- to middle-income workers ? will actually earn less
> money
> than if they had stuck with Social Security.
>
> While wealthier workers might have done better under privatization,
> middle
> and low-wage workers did significantly worse.  According to a GAO
> report, a
> low-wage County employee working for 35 years would earn $1,125 a
> month
> under Social Security, but as little as $542 under the privatized
> plan.
>
> So much for Bush's plan to help poorer Americans.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> I Support Al Gore for President!
> http://www.algore2000.com
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
> Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
> income
> tax purposes.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> I Support Al Gore for President!
> http://www.algore2000.com
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
> Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
> income
> tax purposes.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <13EB2E1A97CAD311BB9200508B8FA56E04CE1D@FONTHEIM_SERVER>
From: Sally Painter <SPainter@fontheiminternational.com>
To: Rhonda Russell <RRussell@fontheiminternational.com>
Subject: FW: Gore2000 TPs: Bush's Secret Plan for Social Security Revealed !
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 14:26:01 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dear All,

It was great to see you all at the dinner.  See below.

Best,

Sally Painter

Gore2000 Talking Points
Wednesday, May 17, 2000

?    Gore challenges Bush to Social Security debate at AARP conference
in
Orlando
?    Bush's Secret Plan Revealed!
?    Bush continues to face fire over privatization plan
?    Middle and low income workers worse-off under Texas alternative to
Social Security

GORE CHALLENGES BUSH TO SOCIAL SECURITY DEBATE AT AARP CONFERENCE IN
ORLANDO

Addressing approximately 10,000 seniors at the AARP's Biennial
Convention,
Al Gore today challenged George W. Bush to hold a debate, "as soon as
possible," on their competing Social Security proposals. Gore has called
for Social Security reform "based not on stock market speculation, but
on
fiscal responsibility and debt reduction." Bush is pushing the partial
privatization of Social Security, but has provided no specific details.

BUSH WOULD COMPLETELY PRIVATIZE  SOCIAL SECURITY

George Bush has revealed that his "secret plan" for Social Security is
an
attempt to completely dismantle and privatize the 65-year system of
social
insurance, according to reports in the New York Times, the Associated
Press, and the Houston Chronicle.

The Chronicle reports that "Republican presidential candidate George W.
Bush on Tuesday said his plan to create private savings accounts could
be
the first step toward a complete privatization of Social Security."

"It's going to take a while to transition to a system where personal
savings accounts are the predominant part of the investment vehicle,"
Bush
said. "This is a step toward a completely different world, and an
important
step."

Bush admits that the individual private accounts are but the first step
in
his larger plan to privatize the program.  This may be good for the
stockbrokers who have poured $3 million into his Presidential campaign,
but
it is a horrible deal for America.

BUSH PLAN PANNED IN THE PRESS

Bush's privatization plan has come under fire from responsible
journalists
and editorial pages across the country.

A New York Daily News editorial writes:
"On the future of Social Security, the presidential candidates have
offered
stark choices. Bush would destroy the program; Gore would save it. Easy
choice."

Paul Krugman addresses the current concern about the stock market being
overvalued at present:
"If you think that stocks are currently overpriced, this [the Bush]
proposal sounds like a recipe for disaster: it will encourage workers to
buy stocks at exactly the wrong time -- eventually leading to an even
worse
Social Security crisis, as the government finds itself under intense
pressure to bail out the baby boomers."

TEXAS ALTERNATIVE TO SOCIAL SECURITY HURTS RETIREES

The Baltimore Sun today revealed that three Texas counties which opted
out
of the Social Security system in the early 1980s in favor of private
investments.  According to the Sun, many of the counties' 3,000
employees ?
especially low- to middle-income workers ? will actually earn less money
than if they had stuck with Social Security.

While wealthier workers might have done better under privatization,
middle
and low-wage workers did significantly worse.  According to a GAO
report, a
low-wage County employee working for 35 years would earn $1,125 a month
under Social Security, but as little as $542 under the privatized plan.

So much for Bush's plan to help poorer Americans.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I Support Al Gore for President!
http://www.algore2000.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
income
tax purposes.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I Support Al Gore for President!
http://www.algore2000.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Paid for by Gore 2000, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203.
Contributions to Gore 2000, Inc. are not tax deductible for Federal
income
tax purposes.


Susan:
In preparation for our forms meeting next week could you please have your
secretary prepare sets of the latest versions of the following for the group
(Jason included):

1. ISDA Schedule
2. CSA Schedule plus LC provisions
3. Industrial Master
4. Annex A  - ENA and ECC
5. Annex B to Omnibus Form (include all collateral variations)
6. Canadian and US Tax Annexes
7. Guaranty Form

Did I miss any forms that we should talk about?

If they could be distributed by Monday  - Noon, that would be great.  Thanks.

Carol


Brent, Andrea and I were hoping you might be available for a 30-minute call
on Tuesday after 5pm (BA time) or 2pm (Houston time) on Tuesday, Feb. 29.
The BA office had a meeting last Friday afternoon and has apparently set some
rather lofty goals, such as online trading for Q3, etc.  Please let me or
Brent know if you are available and/or alternative times.

Tomorrow we meet with the American Chamber of Commerce, Wed. with Marval and
the ADA and the Securities Commission, and Thursday with tax consultants.
Also, I need to talk with you about Brazil when I return.  Sami has been
diligent about forwarding deal flow information and there are a ton of
references to PPA's and SWAPS.  We are still trying to get our arms around
all the business units in Brazil to track their activity.  Have you heard
from Yao?  This international position may be right up his alley. Sara


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001
04:28 PM ---------------------------
From: Iris Mack/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/19/2001 03:22 PM
To: Scott Salmon/EU/Enron@Enron, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Craig Chaney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Mumford/LON/ECT@ECT, Eric
Kirkpatrick/EU/Enron@Enron, Richard Brent/EU/Enron@Enron, Ben
Parsons/LON/ECT@ECT, George Albanis/LON/ECT@ECT, Vasant
Shanbhogue/ENRON@enronXgate, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Hi again,

 As, I stated is a prior emails, the contact details for the RiskCalc folks
are as follows:

1.  Marc Brammer
Director of Strategic Sales
tel:  800.523.2627, x5706
mbrammer@MoodysRMS.com

2. Neal Clark
Vice President
Tel:  800.523.2627, x5701
nclark@MoodysRMS.com

 Neal said that he would be willing to set up a meeting between us and their
quants to better understand their model, the various inputs and whether or
not the model can be tweaked for less than the 17 specified inputs.

 Let me know if you guys wish to have Neal set up a conference between
Moody's quants and Enron folks in Houston and London.

Ciao,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Salmon, Scott
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 3:00 PM
To: Mack, Iris; Dhar, Amitava
Cc: Chaney, Craig; Mumford, Mike; Kirkpatrick, Eric; Brent, Richard; Parsons,
Ben; Albanis, George
Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Iris/Amitava,

I may have already said this, but we've had so many e-mails and telephone
calls flying back and forth that I wanted to make sure I at least got this
much out to you.  Clearly, I would like you to set up the meeting with the
RiskCalc gurus to dig deeper into their methodology (as much as they'll tell)
and the impact of missing variables and any other idiosyncracies the model
may have.  Also try to get a better feel for how well they think the model
extends to other countries.  I know from a previous conversation with Lea
Carty and reading about the model that it was calibrated off North American
names but they suspect it might extend to other countries.  Conversely, I
know they are working efforts within Moody's Risk Management Services to
develop private (and probably public) firm models specific to regions.  One
they mentioned was Australia and also within Western Europe.  Data, as
always, was the issue.  See if the quants have any perspective on their
success/plan in that area.

Lastly, we truly appreciate the aggressive efforts you both have made toward
pushing off this private model initiative and I'm very confident we'll be
able to nail a firm plan down upon receipt of either D&B and/or Experian data.

Cheers,
Scott
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Salmon/EU/Enron on 19/04/2001 20:51
---------------------------

Mike Mumford@ECT
19/04/2001 17:55
To: Scott Salmon/EU/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Mumford/LON/ECT on 19/04/2001 17:59
---------------------------
From: Iris Mack/ENRON@enronXgate on 19/04/2001 09:23 CDT
To: Mike Mumford/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Hi,

 Two RiskCalc sales people made a presentation this week about their product.

 They stated that they could set up a meeting with their quants and our
people to discuss the model input and what happens if we have less than 17
inputs.

Regards,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mumford, Mike
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 1:37 AM
To: Mack, Iris
Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Ooops... part II.

I just threw out 12 as a number for something we might develop... it's really
not based on anything.  We know 17 will work for pre-packaged programs.  We
also know there will be a great number of names with less than the full 17...
I assume we would pursue another model (internal or external) to provide
probably less accurate numbers but at least available for names with fewer
inputs.

Mike

From: Iris Mack/ENRON@enronXgate on 18/04/2001 15:02 CDT
To: Mike Mumford/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Salmon/EU/Enron@Enron, Eric
Kirkpatrick/EU/Enron@Enron

Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Hi Mike,

 Thanks for your email.

 What do you mean by "buying blind  all major data associated with these
specific DUNS numbers"?

 I am puzzled about why you would be looking at 17 vs 12 fields.  I know
RiskCalc requires 17 inputs and seem to apply that the model does not work
for less than 17.  Yesterday the RiskCalc sales people could not guarantte
that their model would work for less than the required 17 data inputs.  They
suggested that this would be a question to direct towards their quants who
developed the model.

Regards,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mumford, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 1:20 PM
To: Mack, Iris
Cc: Dhar, Amitava; Salmon, Scott; Kirkpatrick, Eric
Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Iris,

Thanks.

After our meeting we stuck around to discuss things a little further.

Specifically with respect to global counterparty names... we have DUNS
cross-references on about 70 of active names (13k out of 18.5k).  We could
greatly accellerate purchase of some useful data by buying blind all major
data associated with these specific DUNS numbers.

Pro  -  Data gets in on names we know we want to review ASAP, but without
resolution on which specific fields are most useful.  We also get to test for
completeness of data (how many have all 17 fields... how many have only 12 of
which fields, etc.).

Con  -  Costs could be significantly higher... buying info we don't know we
need (converse of buying only the 17 fields doesn't seem best answer).  We
would end up buying additional info later... overhead costs and piecemeal
buying will increase costs.  IT development time would be greatly
increased... multiple file formats... developing to unknown maximum size,
etc.... redoing when more data is purchased.

Any thoughts.

Mike


Here is the latest CA, Teaser letter and contact list.


Got it!  Will send you documentation this evening.  Thanks for speaking with Johnny.

-----Original Message-----
From: Terri Dickerson [mailto:TDICKERS@westerngas.com]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:57 PM
To: Lokay, Michelle
Subject: Marketing

Michelle:  Let's see if this works.  I've attached the description.  Also, I spoke with Johnny Tramel this morning but he does not have any openings. Let me know if you get this.

Terri D


I vote for waiting until Monday to discuss.  This is one part of the larger
PR / Government Affairs strategy in California.  We need Karen Denne (PR) to
come to Portland for the meeting on Monday.

Jim

	Tim Belden@ECT
	10/24/2000 05:54 PM

		 To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Information Release Message

When do you guys want to talk through this?  Who should be involved?  Can it
wait until Monday when we have our California meeting here in Portland?


FYI...

Cheers,
Will Smith
x37486

----- Forwarded by Duong Luu/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 12:38 PM -----

	Tantra Invedy
	01/10/2001 11:32 AM

		 To: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zhiyong Wei/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Bowie/LON/ECT@ECT,
Steve Nat/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John D Powell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ganapathy
Ramesh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anna M Docwra/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mable Tang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Soo-Lian Eng Ervin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex
Hsieh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Ogg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jaikishore Bharathi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tantra Invedy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lana Yu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Qing Wu/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Carey Mansfield/Corp/Enron@Enron, Erika Abercrombie/Corp/Enron@Enron, Neil
Leninger/NA/Enron@Enron, David Wile/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlene
Fricker/NA/Enron@Enron, Emmett Cleveland/NA/Enron@ENRON, Xiaowu
Huang/NA/Enron@Enron, Thu H Nguyen/NA/Enron@Enron, Toan Ngo/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kahled Kahlouni/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Jahnke/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: I have send emergency request request for PWRPROD1

All,

As requested, I have schedulled 10 minutes downtime for PWRPROD1 tonight from
10:00pm until 10:10pm.

The purpose is to increase the maximum number of processes from 500 into 800.

In the last 1 week, the max number of processes was exceeded twice, so we
need to resolve this problem as soon as possible.

Please forward this information to anyone who should be notified.

Thank you.

Tantra.
x34304


.name {  font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal; line-height: normal; font-weight: bold; color: #428AB5; text-decoration: none}   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
 [IMAGE] Dear James, [IMAGE]
  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]
 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]
 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]
 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]


Real-Time is on board and is comfortable with this...any questions from settlements?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Amador, Susan
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:34 PM
To:	Williams III, Bill
Cc:	Steiner, David; Poston, David; Richter, Jeff; Gilbert, Scotty
Subject:	EnPower outage

Bill,

The DBAs for the EnPower database want to take it down from 4 PM Friday afternoon (6 PM Houston) to 4 PM Saturday afternoon (6PM Houston).  The reason for this is the NETCO/Estate database and hardware split that is occuring this weekend.  Let us know as soon as possible if this is ok or not so the DBA's can get their plan togethre for this weekend.

thanks,

Susan Amador
503.464.8681 office


are the softball games tues nights?  when do they start? where are they?  i
need to tell that chick.


Attached please find the proposed credit terms for the EPMI Master Power
Purchase and Sale Agreement and the ENA Enfolio Agreements.  Kay Mann and
Reagan Rorschach are currently working on closing an Energy Management
Services Agreement and these additional documents are an intergral part of
the management agmt.  We anticipate closing by the end of the month, so
please place these contracts on your list of "high" priorities.  Comments or
questions, please call.

Ed Sacks
x5-7712


Well, we have a slight problem.  Mark has just replied to my memo and he will
not be in Houston on that date.  Could we make it for August 28, 2000 ?

Thanks,

Kay  3-0643

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  David W Delainey                           07/12/2000 03:40 PM

Sent by: Kay Chapman
To: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Julie A
Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Venita
Coleman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicki
Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect
Subject: QBR HPL/LRC/Upstream Origination

Dave and Mark have asked me to arrange a meeting, QBR HPL/LRC/Upstream
Origination, and I would like to know if August 22, 2000 from 1:00 - 5:00 pm
will work for all of you?

Thank you in advance for your promt attention to this matter.

Thanks,

Kay 3-0643


----- Forwarded by Paul T Lucci/NA/Enron on 05/30/2001 09:25 AM -----

	Todd B Hattenbach 05/09/2000 08:14 AM 	   To: Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron  cc:   Subject: Carrying A Load?


can we move this to the 32 floor of the enron building ?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	monica.l.brown@accenture.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-monica+2El+2Ebrown+40accenture+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:41 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Cc:	sheri.a.righi@accenture.com; mery.l.brown@accenture.com
Subject:	Confirmation: Risk Management Simulation Meeting 9/27/01

Hi Dutch,

This message is to confirm our meeting with you on Thursday, Sept. 27th
from 2:00-4:00pm in Conference Room 14C2 3AC.

If you should have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me
at 713-345-6687.

Thanks,
Monica L. Brown
Accenture
PDP Experienced Analyst
Houston - 2929 Allen Parkway
Direct Dial: +1 713 837 1749
VPN & Octel: 83 / 71749
Fax: +1 713 257 7211
email: monica.l.brown@accenture.com

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Daily Energy Letter
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/Energy-Letter1-14-02.pdf


Probably a smart decision. Rick


Click on this link to view report -->


Attached is the Weekly Report for week ending November 10.

On Monday, I will release this same report with all associated orders
linked.  As of next week, our Weekly Government Affairs (Gas) Reports will be
accessible only on our ETS website.  Many prior reports are already archived
for your convenience.


lame reply


Mortgage companies make you wait...They Demand to Interview you...
They Intimidate you...They Humiliate you...
And All of That is While They Decide If They Even Want to Do Business With You...

We Turn the Tables on Them...
Now, You're In Charge

Just Fill Out Our Simple Form and They Will Have to Compete For Your Business...
CLICK HERE FOR FORM <http://www.cyberlinks2k.org/loan/>

We have hundreds of loan programs, including

Purchase Loans
Refinance
Debt Consolidation
Home Improvement
Second Mortgages
No Income Verification

You will often be contacted with an offer the very same day you fill out the form!

National Average Mortgage Rates

Program

Rates

30 Yr Firm

6.78%

15 Yr Firm

6.40%

1 Yr Arm

5.51%

Just Look at Today's Rates!

You can save Thousands Of Dollars over the course of your loan with just a 1/4 of 1% Drop in your rate!

CLICK HERE FOR FORM <http://www.cyberlinks2k.org/loan/>

Remove <http://www.cyberlinks2k.org/remove.html>


<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">

<BASE HREF="http://football222.fantasy.sportsline.com/mp/">

Save 10% Speak No Evil, Hear No Evil Monkey Bikes... One of the Hottest Gifts for Holiday 2001... Just enter the coupon code MQJ36GX6 in the checkout process to receive your discount.  Offer expires November 16, 2001.

Want to win your Fantasy League?  Our Fantasy Football Guides are the SOURCE for strategy, player ratings, scouting reports, team reports, projections and more!  A must have for beginners and Fantasy veterans alike.  Special in season price $9.99. Going Fast - Click Here!

Save $.05 a gallon on the gas that keeps your car's engine clean. Click here to apply online.

Brought to you by

<MAP NAME="menu.map">
<AREA shape="rect" coords="0, 1, 83, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/217/sffer1113e.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="83, 1, 166, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/12/sffer1113w.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="166, 1, 249, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/226/sffer1113c.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="249, 1, 332, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffer1113v.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="332, 1, 415, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/163/sffer1113t.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="415, 1, 498, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/1/sffer1113s.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="498, 1, 581, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/10/sffer1113i.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="581, 1, 664, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/3/sffer1113ffr.cgi">

</MAP>

You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for
    CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule,
    or turn off these reports please
    click here

NFL Reports, Player Updates

Latest NFL Player News

Correll Buckhalter, RB PHI - Free Agent Updated 11/17/01
Buckhalter has been suspended for this weekend's game against Dallas. He is one of three Eagles who will be held out of the game. Brian Mitchell will likely serve as Duce Staley's backup.

Jamal Lewis, RB BAL - Free Agent Updated 11/17/01
According to published reports, Lewis has been suspended for four games. Lewis' four-game suspension went into effect on Friday and he will not be allowed to work out or rehabi!
li!
tate with the team for four weeks, or until Dec. 17. Instead, Lewis will work toward recovering from a torn ACL in Tennessee.

Tyrone Wheatley, RB OAK - Giggles Updated 11/16/01
Wheatley (knee) is out for Sunday's game with the Chargers. Charlie Garner will once again be Oakland's feature back. Zack Crockett may be used in goal-line situations.

Frank Wycheck, TE TEN - Matty Updated 11/16/01
According to published reports, Wycheck is expected to play half of Sunday's game against Cincinnati. That makes him a risky start from a Fantasy p!
er!
spective.

Steve McNair, QB TEN - Free Agent Updated 11/16/01
McNair's status is still in question for Sunday's game against Cincinnati due to an injured right thumb. He threw the ball during individual drills Friday, and according to published reports, is likely to play despite not being 100 percent. We don't recommend McNair this week as a result.

Emmitt Smith, RB DAL - Bass/Hull Updated 11/16/01
Smith will return to the lineup Sunday against Philadelphia after missing two games with a sprained right knee. Cowboys Head Coach Dave Campo said after Fri!
da!
y's practice that Smith would "be ready to play the majority of the game." His return bumps Troy Hambrick to fullback, but we wouldn't recommend you use either back against the stingy Eagles rush defense.

Frank Sanders, WR ARI - Free Agent Updated 11/16/01
Sanders (hamstring) was added to the NFL injury report on Friday and is now listed as questionable for Sunday's game against Detroit.  However, if you're completely desperate for a wideout in a larger league this week, Sanders' matchup against a vulnerable Detroit secondary is worth considering as long as he's able to play.

Chris Weinke, QB CAR!
 -!
 Tori
Updated 11/16/01
According to published reports, Weinke will be the starting quarterback for Sunday's game against San Francisco. However, he's not worth starting on your Fantasy team.

Daunte Culpepper, QB MIN - Giggles Updated 11/16/01
Culpepper is one pace for a good Fantasy season despite the lack of consistency in Minnesota's offense this season. He's one of the better quarterbacks in the league from a Fantasy perspective, and should be in your starting lineup on a weekly basis.

Cris Carter, WR MIN - Tori Updated 11/16/01<!
BR>Carter's numbers may be down somewhat this season, but he's still too good to ever consider benching. The veteran has a knack for finding the end zone, and should have a good game against rookie CB Will Allen and the Giants' secondary on Monday night.

Randy Moss, WR MIN - Russell Updated 11/16/01
Moss is listed as probable for Monday's game against the N.Y. Giants due to an ankle injury. He's been underachieving this season, but it's almost impossible to bench him based on his potential to post solid Fantasy numbers.

Ricky Williams, RB NO - Bass/Hull!
 <!
FONT SIZE=1>
Updated 11/16/01
Williams is one of the better Fantasy backs in the league, and is a good player to use on a weekly basis. He'll face an Indianapolis defense that has been underachieving all season long, so Williams is a must-start.

Aaron Brooks, QB NO - Matty Updated 11/16/01
Brooks had a big game against San Francisco last weekend, throwing for 347 yards and two scores. He may be a bit inconsistent this season, but his potential to post huge numbers makes it tough to bench him, especially against a vulnerable Indianapolis defense.

Willie Jackson</!
B>!
, WR NO - Martin Updated 11/16/01
Jackson put up a huge game against San Francisco last weekend, posting 11 catches and 167 yards receiving. He'll face a questionable Indianapolis squad that is vulnerable to the pass in Week 10, so starting Jackson this week is a solid option.

Stephen Davis, RB WAS - Bass/Hull Updated 11/16/01
Davis has stepped up his play after beginning the season slowly. He's averaged 112 yards rushing over his last four games, and is once again emerging as a reliable Fantasy player. Give him the start in Week 10 against a Denver defense that is vulnerable to high scoring games.

Tony Banks, QB WAS - Free Agent Updated 11/16/01
Banks has played well of late, throwing five touchdowns in his last three games. He's got a good matchup this weekend against a Denver team that can be beaten through the air, but he's only worth considering in very deep Fantasy leagues.

Michael Westbrook, WR WAS - Free Agent Updated 11/16/01
Westbrook has been inconsistent this season, but he has caught three touchdown passes in his last four games. He'll face a Denver secondary this weekend that is vulnerable at best, so starting him in deeper leagues is !
wo!
rth considering.

Rod Gardner, WR WAS - Free Agent Updated 11/16/01
Gardner has been held in check in his last two games, catching only three passes for 38 yards. He does have a favorable matchup this weekend against Denver, however, so starting him is a good move.

Az-Zahir Hakim, WR STL - Neal/McKay Updated 11/16/01
Hakim has been inconsistent in recent weeks, so starting him on your Fantasy team is a gamble unless the matchup is right. He'll go up against a tough New England secondary in Week Ten, so avoid using him outside of de!
ep!
er leagues.

Torry Holt, WR STL - Tori Updated 11/16/01
Holt continues to put up consistent yardage totals, but he's only scored only three touchdowns this season. He'll face a tough New England secondary this weekend, but he's still worth starting on your Fantasy team based on his potential to put up solid numbers.

Isaac Bruce, WR STL - Frank Updated 11/16/01
Bruce hasn't put up the huge Fantasy totals this season, but he's still one of the better wideouts in the league. He'll face CB Ty Law and the formidable New England secondary, but he's still wo!
rt!
h starting based on his potential for big numbers.

Marshall Faulk, RB STL - Matty Updated 11/16/01
Faulk had a huge game against Carolina, proving that he is still the best Fantasy player in the league. He's a must-start every week, and should post solid numbers in Week 10 against New England.

Ernie Conwell, TE STL - Free Agent Updated 11/16/01

Conwell has had a few down weeks, so starting him on your Fantasy team is somewhat of a gamble. With the lack of depth at tight end around the league, however, starting Conwell is something many Fantasy owners will have no choice but to do.

Richard Huntley, RB CAR - Russell Updated 11/16/01
Huntley will be the likely starter this weekend against San Francisco, but don't be surprised if he splits carries with Nick Goings. Avoid starting either back in Week 10 if at all possible.

Donald Hayes, WR CAR - Martin Updated 11/16/01
Hayes ha!
d !
only two catches for 11 yards last weekend against St. Louis. He's been unreliable for Fantasy owners this season, so starting him is a real gamble.

Wesley Walls, TE CAR - Free Agent Updated 11/16/01
Walls has been held in check over the last three weeks, but he's still one of the better tight ends in the league. He's had some success against San Francisco in the past, so starting him is advisable.

Muhsin Muhammad, WR CAR - Martin Updated 11/16/01

Muhammad finally had a somewhat productive game, catching six passes for 75 yards against St. Louis. He's had some success in the past against this week's opponent, San Francisco, so starting him is a decent move.

Brett Favre, QB GB - Frank Updated 11/16/01
Favre has been one of the best Fantasy quarterbacks in the league this season. He'll face an Atlanta team on Sunday with a very vulnerable secondary, so be sure to start Favre this week.

Bubba Franks, TE GB - Free Agent Updated 11/16/01
Franks may not put up huge yardage numbers!
, !
but his seven touchdowns in eight games makes him a valuable Fantasy player. Unless you have a better option on your roster, Franks is the type of tight end that should start on a weekly basis.

Bill Schroeder, WR GB - Frank Updated 11/16/01
Schroeder (ankle) is not listed on the NFL injury report, and is expected to start on Sunday against Atlanta. He's a solid play this week against Atlanta, whose secondary is vulnerable to strong passing teams like Green Bay.

More Updates

Schedule, Breakdown

Neal/McKay

Player	Pos	Points

Manning, Peyton	QB	20.0

Anderson, Mike	RB	2.0

Smith, Lamar	RB	5.0

Hakim, Az-Zahir	WR	0.0

McCardell, Keenan	WR	12.0

Rice, Jerry	WR	8.0

Stover, Matt	K	10.0

Broncos	DT	14.0

TOTAL	 	71.0

Dayne, Ron	RB	10.0

Testaverde, Vinny	QB	6.0

Barber, Tiki	RB	11.0

Bryson, Shawn	RB	0.0

Jones, Freddie	TE	0.0

Richardson, Tony	RB	4.0

		at Tori

Player	Pos	Points

Fiedler, Jay	QB	16.0

George, Eddie	RB	9.0

Martin, Curtis	RB	29.0

Carter, Cris	WR	14.0

Holt, Torry	WR	7.0

Toomer, Amani	WR	4.0

Richey, Wade	K	4.0

Eagles	DT	15.0

TOTAL	 	98.0

Ward, Hines	WR	5.0

Allen, Terry	RB	0.0

Barlow, Kevan	RB	15.0

Brookins, Jason	RB	5.0

Pathon, Jerome	WR	1.0

Weinke, Chris	QB	0.0

Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.
Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com

FB10SP


-----Original Message-----
From: jbrewer.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com [mailto:jbrewer.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:26 PM
To: chenson.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com; jswank.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com; bshook.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com; br33burke@aol.com; plucci@enron.com; jeffw@worldstrides.com; L97613@udscorp.com; ratelove@ev1.net; lisalindsley@hotmail.com
Subject: Fwd: fire truck

imahiker@hotmail.com
12/17/2001 01:02 PM EST

To: jbrewer@leathercenter.com, cwhouse@nwlink.com, musicl1@hotmail.com, celowrie@hotmail.com
cc:
bcc:
Subject: Fwd: fire truck

From: RZittrower@aol.com
To: mwcrews@bellsouth.net, GDcrews@hotmail.com, Kdcrews1@email.msn.com,
  imahiker@hotmail.com, Marvinecrews@aol.com, tashby40@bellsouth.net,
 FZittrower@aol.com
Subject: fire truck
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 09:46:04 EST

A fire fighter is working on the engine outside the
station when he notices a little girl next door in a
little red
wagon with little ladders hung off of the side and a
garden hose
tightly coiled in the middle.

The girl is wearing a fire-fighter's helmet and has
the wagon tied to a dog and a cat.

The fire fighter walks over to take a closer look.
"That sure is a nice fire truck," the fire fighter
says, with
admiration.

"Thanks," the little girl says.

The fire fighter looks a little closer and notices
the girl has tied the wagon to the dog's collar and
to the cat's
testicles.

"Little partner" the fire fighter says, "I don't
want to tell you how to run your fire truck, but if
you were to tie
that
rope around the cat's collar, I think you could go
faster."

The little girl says, "You're probably right, but
then I wouldn't
have a siren.

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: <http://mobile.msn.com>


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Michael F. Terraso
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: October 2001
Report Total: $1,660.22
Amount Due Employee: $1,660.22

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


anytime after 4:30pm is fine...I am at EB-3233C

Fletch


Good morning Ladies!
This deal has two different terms entered.  One says 12/1/00-12/31/00 (in
which case, it needs to be changed to "yes/agreement" and the other says
12/1/00-12/1/00 (in which case, we don't confirm).
Please let me know.
Thanks!  Glad to have you with us Kate!!!
Kim


800.713.8600 code: 80435


Attached is a file with my allocations of Texas Operations to be used for the
2000 Plan.  However, please note that their are some problems/clean-up that
needs to occur that I could not do.

As you requested, I have taken the % we allocated to Gas Assets last year and
put the appropriate %'s into the appropriate group within Gas Assets as you
have broken them out.  Please note:  Gas Network Trading is the same group as
ST GasTexas (group 8) - Tom Martin is responsible for both.  I have indicated
the appropriate %'s into the NEW buckets, but I was not able to ZERO out the
ST GasTexas group as the cells are protected.  Consequently, the TOTAL column
indicates that I have allocated over 100%.  The #'s in Gas Network Trading
are correct.  Will you please delete ST GasTexas so that no one will allocate
to it?
When the plan allocations were submitted last year, there was an error in
RC1160 - Volume Management.  I thought we corrected it but it is still
showing up incorrectly.  Please move the 8% under East Origin to ST GasEast.
I was not able to correct this either as the cells have been protected.
Please note:  This is not a change from the plan, but a correction of an
error.

I would appreciate you correcting these things for me, and forwarding the
corrected version back to me for my records.  I will be working with our
management team on the 1/00 allocations, and will provide you those by
Friday.  Please call me if you have any questions.  Thanks.

MANAGEMENT TEAM:  Please review, and work on how we should be allocated for
1/00.  We have changes for Denver business, Project Sally, NewCo, etc.  We
will discuss in the staff meeting on Tuesday, 1/18.


February 2002		Scheduled

Friday 08
West			 (1036)
San Juan	                867
East			   (315)

Saturday 09
West			  (941)
San Juan		   855
East			  (467)

Sunday 10
West			   (940)
San Juan		    854
East			   (442)

Monday 11
West			   (958)
San Juan		    873
East			   (441)


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/25/2001 09:46 AM -----

	"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
	04/25/2001 09:41 AM

		 To: "Mark Evans" <mevans@bracepatt.com>, <mmilner@coral-energy.com>,
<rreilley@coral-energy.com>, <ray.alvarez@ei.enron.com>, <acomnes@enron.com>,
<dfulton@enron.com>, <jdasovic@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>,
<rshapiro@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>,
<gackerman@wptf.org>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: Reuters - Calif. bill would penalize energy price gougers

----- Message from "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com> on Tue, 24 Apr
2001 10:19:24 -0500 -----
To:	"Justin Long" <jlong@bracepatt.com>, "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>
cc:	"Aryeh Fishman" <afishman@bracepatt.com>, "Andrea Settanni"
<asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Shoneman" <cshoneman@bracepatt.com>, "Dan
Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Kimberly Curry" <kcurry@bracepatt.com>,
"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>, "Randall Rich"
<rrich@bracepatt.com>
Subject:	Reuters - Calif. bill would penalize energy price gougers
FYI

Calif. bill would penalize energy price gougers

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
     SAN FRANCISCO, April 23 (Reuters) - California legislators could be
handed a bill this week that, if approved, would make it a criminal offense
for anyone caught price gouging in the state's volatile energy market, a
legislative source told Reuters.

     "We are right now waiting on final language for a bill that would
propose putting penalties on energy companies which have engaged in price
gouging," the source said.

     He said the bill, likely to be introduced in the Assembly Wednesday,
would seek stiff financial penalties for violators.

     It was not yet clear how long it would take for the bill to make its way
to the Assembly floor for debate.

     The bill follows a call earlier this month by Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante
for laws making it a felony for energy companies "to charge unreasonable and
unjust energy rates".

     A spokesman for Bustamante confirmed the proposed legislation would
address California's soaring natural gas prices, more than quadruple what
they were a year ago and now the highest in the nation, but was unsure when
the bill would go to the Assembly.

     High natural gas prices have played a key role in pushing up power
prices because gas-fired turbines are the single biggest source of
electricity in California, providing more than a third of the power used by
the state's 34 million residents.

     California's power crisis stems from a 1996 deregulation plan that
allowed wholesale prices to soar but capped retail rates. The result has been
a string of rolling blackouts in January and March, rising rates, a spotty
power supply and the bankruptcy of the state's biggest utility.

     But a number of state officials believe price gouging and illegal
activity have been behind the sharp rise in power and gas prices in
California.

     The California Independent System Operator, which operates most of the
state power grid, filed two reports with federal regulators in late March
alleging more than $6 billion in overcharges by wholesale power suppliers
over a 10-month period.

     The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which regulates interstate
electricity and gas sales and transmission, has also accused 13 western power
generators of overcharging California utilities $124 million for wholesale
power in January and February.

     FERC ordered $69 million in refunds on power bought in January and $55
million for purchases in February.

     Energy companies like Duke Energy , EL Paso Energy Corp. and Dynegy have
repeatedly denied any wrongdoing in California's chaotic wholesale power
market, arguing the prices they charge reflect the underlying cost of power
generation, tight supplies throughout the region, and the high financial risk
of doing business in the state.

     Last week, California Attorney General Bill Lockyer asked San Francisco
Superior Court to force power generators Reliant Energy Inc. and Mirant Corp.
to turn over documents subpoenaed in his probe of possible price gouging in
the state after the two firms failed to produce the documents.

     Lockyer, who initiated this investigation last August, is also
conducting a similar investigation into whether anti-competitive practices
are behind the rise in gas prices.

     It is unknown when that investigation will be completed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Copyright , 2001 Reuters Limited.


Thanks for this and agreeing to attend (my office).

CRC was Paul Waine's baby and no counterparty has agreed to it. It's complex
and not a real flyer.

My preference would be to live with the tax risk if you can bear it and put
in place the back-to-backs.

EEFT can arrange for anyone (including Sempra!). Until tomorrow.

Paul

Janine Juggins
05/24/99 02:04 PM
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Conference Call Tuesday 25 May 1999

Paul,
I am happy to attend - I assume your office ?

I had a quick chat with Paul Wallace, as far as I can see this "informal
procedure" has been put in place to achieve the effect of credit
consolidation. I wonder whether in fact bona fide credit consoldiation could
be put in place to deal with Sempra and Dapsa (an Argentinian counterparty
where the same things happen). This would involve, ECTRI doing the deal with
Sempra, the deal then being automatically novated to ECT Houston, with a back
to back to ECTRI. ECT Houston would bear the credit risk (and be compensated
at arm's length for this) and ECTRI would have the same economics as the
original transaction with Sempra.

With the informal procedure as it stands, there is the risk that ECT Houston
could have a PE in the UK (UK tax presence), although providing that the swap
back to ECTRI is respected the amount of the income subjected to UK tax ought
to be just the compensation for the credit risk. However on the other hand
there is also the wider concern that other ECT Houston activities may get
attributed to the UK PE (such as the currency desk).

Presumably from a regulatory perspective EEFT can act as arranger for ECT
Houston ???

Regards
Janine

Paul Simons
24/05/99 13:37
To: Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Conference Call Tuesday 25 May 1999

I'll need you or a nominee to attend this one, please, to advise on tax --thks
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Simons/LON/ECT on 05/24/99 01:41 PM
---------------------------

Nicola Beales
05/21/99 04:48 PM
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Conference Call Tuesday 25 May 1999

Faye Ellis called to arrange a conference call for Tuesday. I put it in your
diary for Tuesday afternoon 4.30pm London time. The conference call is with
Sara Shackleton, Morris Clarke, Steve Douglas and it is regarding Sempra &
Regulatory Issues. They will call you.

Kim


At the request of Marguerite Kahn, attached is the Assignment and Assumption
Agreement marked to reflect her comments.

 <<blackiline - Assignment and Assumption.DOC>>  <<Assignment and Assumption
Agreement.DOC>>

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/13/01 22:57:54
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of conventional
first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are two examples:
janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.  If you have any
questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers."

==============================================================================

 - blackiline - Assignment and Assumption.DOC
 - Assignment and Assumption Agreement.DOC


FYI.  SDG&E Advertisement.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES on 08/28/2000
02:38 PM ---------------------------

Nancy Hetrick
08/25/2000 03:58 AM

To: Victoria Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES, James
Mayhew/HOU/EES@EES, rcavicch@csc.com
cc: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: Payment Policies Ad

Please share with others who might be interested or affected.  Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Nancy Hetrick/HOU/EES on 08/25/2000 05:52
AM ---------------------------

"Clay, Lora" <LClay@SDGE.com> on 08/24/2000 07:52:31 PM
To: alvisopacific@aol.com, andrew.madden@utility.com, aolutility@yahoo.com,
asinger@newenergy.com, athomas@newenergy.com, bdavis3296@aol.com,
blunden@gmer.com, bpotter@essential.com, cbmartin@newenergy.com,
ccleisgang@powercomenergy.com, charles.jacobini@acnenergy.com,
chris.king@utility.com, cssmis@tampabay.rr.com, dbcpa@gte.net,
dbenevid@enron.com, dcurtis@cleanearth.com, ddyc@go-green.com,
eglpwr@gte.net, ehornquist@sempra-slns.com, emonca@emon.com,
glpatervin@aol.com, gmbr@dynegy.com, gpickering@idahopower.com,
Jeffery_T._salway@aep.com, jmolinda@sel.com, jsmollon@newwestenergy.com,
jwinfield@nicomnet.com, mark_allen@iep.illinova.com, gphillip@enron.com,
marsha@tenderland.com, max.alin@ci.seattle.wa.us, merilyn_ferrara@apses.com,
nhetrick@enron.com, nicomnet@pacbell.net, nsloder@newwestenergy.com,
pantrim@deltanet.com, paula.green@ci.seattle.wa.us, pjeff@smartenergy.com,
poshideri@aol.com, rich.menar@southernenergy.com,
rick.counihan@greenmountain.com, rpatterson@coral-energy.com,
rradmer@cleanenergyservice.com, rrodgers@eenergy.com,
rschlanert@electric.com, russ_koehler@yahoo.com, sebaca@sprynet.com,
tbowers@friendlyenergy.com, tdoughert@sel.com, tezi@webtv.net,
tjon@dynegy.com, trush@utilisource.com, wdale@amdax.com
cc: "Clay, Lora" <LClay@SDGE.com>, "Stoyanoff, Angie" <AStoyanoff@SDGE.com>,
"Osborne, Dawn" <DOsborne@SDGE.com>, "Patterson, Allison"
<APatterson@SDGE.com>, "Acuna, Teresa G." <TAcuna@SDGE.com>
Subject: Payment Policies Ad

Attached is a copy of a new ad that will begin running tomorrow for a brief
period in the Union Tribune, North County Times and local community
newspapers.  The ad covers SDG&E's payment policies through October 31.

The ad will also be translated into Spanish and placed in local Spanish
publications.

 <<Final Payment Policy.pdf>>

Lora Clay
Strategic Lead - ESP Relations
Phone:    858 - 654-1787
Pager:    888 - 826-6916
Fax:       858 - 654-1794
E-Mail:  lclay@sdge.com

 - Final Payment Policy.pdf


Guys, attached you will find a draft org memo that I anticpate going out on
Thursday.  I appreciate your patience.  Please give me any comments ASAP
(only major issues).

Brian/Tim, I assume that we need a communication strategy to HPL employees
before this memo goes out - please advise.

Please keep this note confidential until release.

Regards
Delainey


Bob & Leslie,

Sally asked me to set up several meetings for next week.   1st one -
subject:  exactly what CommodityLogic is going to mean to us and how it will
work for us.  She wants the two of you plus:  Leslie - can you designate your
best person for ConfirmLogic & InvoiceLogic and Bob your best person for
NomLogic.  Probably 1 &1/2 hours Monday.  Please let me know your
availability.

2nd one:  Will probably be Thursday morning - can you check availability for
this one also (2 hours).  Participants would be all of the above + Greg
Piper, Tom Gros, Carrie Slagle, Project Managers for InvoiceLogic,
ConfirmLogic, & BankLogic + Mark Taylor in Legal.  Purpose:  Discussion
between Project Managers and end users on CommodityLogic.

I will wait to hear from you Monday morning re: 1st meeting.  I will talk to
Greg's assistant re: his availability on Thursday and get back with you on
2nd meeting.

Thanks,
Patti x39106


Lavorato may not be back from Sao Paulo until 03/22, but his assistant wanted
to tentatively schedule this meeting in case all goes as scheduled.


No, I think Paul intends to have the call.  Joseph, could you please set up a
number for 8:30 am on monday for 30 minutes.  Paul wanted Hedy, Scott, Bev,
Sandi, Paul and Sue to be on the call?  I won't be on the call.  Seems useful
to have Mike Day, too.  Thank you.

Best,
Jeff

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	03/23/2001 06:22 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara <smara@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman <paul.kaufman@enron.com>,
Sandra McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Jeff
Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Bev Hansen
<bhansen@lhom.com>, Ken Smith <ken@kdscommunications.com>, Lysa Akin
<Lysa.Akin@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: [Fwd: Conference Call March 26 @ 9 AM]

Should this replace our planned 8:30 a.m. conference call?

----- Message from athomas@newenergy.com (Aaron Thomas) on Fri, 23 Mar 2001
14:35:21 -0800 -----
To:	dhunter@s-w-k.com, djsmith@s-w-k.com, rick.counihan@greenmountain.com,
brbarkovich@earthlink.net, wbooth@booth-law.com, drothrock@cmta.net,
jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com, kmills@cfbf.com, kmccrea@sablaw.com,
mday@gmssr.com, nplotkin@tfglobby.com, spahnn@hnks.com, wlarson@calstate.edu,
vincent.stewart@ucop.edu, gharrison@calstate.edu, sgovenar@govadv.com,
hgovenar@govadv.com, smccubbi@enron.com, lhastings@cagrocers.com,
theo@ppallc.com, wlarson@calstate.edu, cra@calretailers.com,
mmoretti@calhealth.org, wbrown@lhom.com, randy_britt@robinsonsmay.com,
dominic.dimare@calchamber.com, rochmanm@spurr-remac.org,
rrichter@calhealth.org, ken_pietrelli@ocli.com, dennis.flatt@kp.org,
richard.seguin@kp.org, arm@phaser.com, john.redding@gene.GE.com,
jbradley@svmg.org, wally@laedc.org, jcondie@calrest.org, jmr@ka-pow.com,
aprea.company@worldnet.att.net, dgrueneich@gralegal.com,
jlondon@gralegal.com, davef@abag.ca.gov, jerryl@abag.ca.gov,
finigan@interx.net
Subject:	Conference Call March 26 @ 9 AM
All

I have set up a conference call for us on Monday at 9 AM to discuss our
next steps on ABX 1 clean-up legislation.

Agenda items

Update regarding ABX 21 event and conversation(s) with Laurence
Strategy in the Senate after ABX 21 in Assembly
Press

Talk to you Monday

Aaron

      DATE:               Monday, March 26, 2001 at 9:00am (PST)
      DIAL IN NUMBER:         415-288-4860
      PASSCODE:            17569


> I will be around this week.  It's hard to predict my schedule, so just call
> anytime.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeff
>
>   -----Original Message-----
>  From:   john jesse <jj@johnjesse.com>@ENRON
>
>
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-john+20jesse+20+3Cjj+40johnjesse+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.c
om> ]
>
>
>  Sent:   Tuesday, June 26, 2001 12:00 PM
>  To:     Shankman, Jeffrey A.
>  Subject:  Re: Venini
>
>> Hi John, hope you've been well.  Is the Venini still available?  What
>  is
>> the year?  Jeff
>>
>>   -----Original Message-----
>>  From:   john jesse <jj@johnjesse.com>@ENRON
>>
>>
>  [mailto:IMCEANOTES-john+20jesse+20+3Cjj+40johnjesse+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.c
>  om> ]
>>
>>
>>  Sent:   Friday, March 30, 2001 8:44 AM
>>  To:     Shankman, Jeffrey A.
>>  Subject:  Venini
>>
>>  Dear Jeffrey. . .attached is an image of the Venini vase which is
>  etched
>>  on
>>  the base Venini Murano Italy and is 9 3/4 ins high. Price is ?2200
>>
>>  The Knox vase is best seen in Steve Martins book...(the same model
>  but
>>  same
>>  date 1905.  My one is 9 1/2 ins tall.  Price  ?11000
>>
>>
>>  Regards
>>  John
>>  Email: jj@johnjesse.com
>>   - Venini3.jpg << File: Venini3.jpg >>
>>
>  Hi Jeff. . .Yes the Venini is still available and the date can only be
>  described as circa 1950's.  It has the three line etched mark Venini
>  Murano  Italia.
>
>  Are you in your office over the next few days so that I can find a slot
>  to
>  give you a call.  Please suggest a time.
>
>  I hope you didn't have any trouble with Hurricane Alison. . .
>  --
>
>  Regards
>  John
>  Email: jj@johnjesse.com
>
>
>
>
>
I have taken the Venini Fazzoletto vase to the Packing shop today, addressed
to Smith St and you should receive it early next week.   The price of ?2100
should be deducted from your ?10000 credit.  But let me know what you want
to do
--

Regards
John
Email: jj@johnjesse.com


Hello,

I just received your message.

Are still in NYC? I like it a lot.
I wish my job was associated with traveling.

According to Saturday meeting - I will be there.

Have a save trip back home.

patrycja

From: VKaminski@aol.com Save Address - Block Sender
To: pdalecka@hotmail.com Save Address
CC: VKaminski@aol.com Save Address
Subject: Re: Hello
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 23:22:26 EST
Reply  Reply All  Forward  Delete  Previous Next  Close

Hello Patrycja,

Greetings from the Big Apple.

Saturday works for me. Let's meet at 4:00 p.m. at Carrabba's. It's an
Italian
restaurant on I-45 in the Woodlands. After you pass Conroe, take the
Research
Forest exit  (5-10 miles past Conroe) and stay on the feeder road. Go
through
the lights (Research Forest intersection with I-45). As you continue along
the feeder road you will pass on your right the Woodlands Mall and the
ExxonMobil building,. The restaurant will be on your right, about 200-300
yards before the next lights (I-45 and Sawdust).

I shall have my cell phone with me (713 898 9960). In case you arrive early
you can stop at my home: 10 Snowbird Place, (281) 367 5377. I shall send you
later the instructions how to get there. I shall leave home around 3:45.

Look forward to meeting you.

Vince


WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT?  HAVE YOU SPOKEN WITH THIS GUY?   Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000 03:08 PM -----

	Tim McKone@ENRON
	05/26/2000 02:48 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari
Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Executed Master Agreements

Hello my Esteemed Doctors,

I am in Rodney Malcolm's Commercial Transaction Group focusing on selling
energy outsourcing relationships to industrial consumers.
Based on the list of executed master agreements that was provided to us
recently, many of our targeted industrial customers have not signed our
master swap agreement.

In preparation for our transacting with these customers, would you send me as
soon as possible a copy of our Master Swap Agreement language, a copy of the
more intermediate "Omnibus" Short form Swap agreement, and a copy of the one
or two page confirmation agreement.  I will forward to my group so that they
can become more familiar with the language, and I will also accumulate the
industrial customers that we are closest to closing deals.  I will then
forward the names of those customers to you so that we can get these
documents to the customers in advance of the deals.

If you have any questions or comments, please call me at x35583.  Thank you,
Tim
---------------------- Forwarded by Tim McKone/Corp/Enron on 05/26/2000 02:26
PM ---------------------------

Bob Carter@ECT
05/26/2000 11:15 AM
To: Tim McKone/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Executed Master Agreements

We have a separate group in legal that puts these together.  Ed and I are not
involved in the preparation or negotiation of swap agreements.  The group  in
legal that works on them is led by Mark Taylor (x37459).  Others in the group
are Carol St. Clair (x33989), Sara Shackleton (x35620) and Shari Stack
(x39477).  I suggest that you contact any one of those people.  If I can
assist, please let me know.

	Tim McKone@ENRON
	05/26/2000 11:07 AM

		 To: Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Rodney Malcolm, James A Ajello/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Executed Master Agreements

Hello Bob and Ed.

What is the most efficient way for us to get Master Swap Agreements in place
with our industrial consumers.  With the commodity energy market going
through the roof, many of the industrials are asking us to concentrate on
solving their short term commodity exposure and look to establish a  greater
outsourcing opportunity in the future.  We do not seem to have Master Swap
Agreements in place with industrials such as IMC Global, AK Steel, WR Grace,
and our solutions will involve financial swaps.

Thank you. Tim


Hello all:

FYI!

How is the headcount coming?

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2000
09:40 AM ---------------------------

"Steve Collins" <scollins@vailresorts.com> on 03/23/2000 09:41:19 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron Offsite - The Great Divide - April 27, 28, 29 and 30th

Hello!

The 29th will be fine--if we can definitely get everything in by then.  I
just worry a little when we start getting less than a month out.  We need to
make sure that our Conference Services office has enough time to detail all
of your functions properly so that everything flows smoothly.

Also please know that the availability of those $274 airfares is also not
guaranteed until booked (you know how those airlines are about changing fares
around).  We need to be able to book a specific class of service to get that
fare, so once those are gone the fare cannot be guaranteed.  Do you want me
to get started with the air contract?

Please keep me posted!  Thanks!

Steve

Steve Collins
National Sales Manager
The Village at Breckenridge/Great Divide Lodge
(800) 332-0424 or (970)453-3156 direct
scollins@vailresorts.com

>>> "Shirley Crenshaw" <Shirley.Crenshaw@ect.enron.com> 03/23/00 08:12AM >>>

Good morning Steve:

I received your voice mail and the flight information sounds great!

I need to update you as to the status of everything at present.

   The contract is fine, however, I am not authorized to sign it, so if it is
   allright, we are putting "John Griebling's" name in my place.  He will
sign
   the contract and we will put the charges on his credit card.

   However, John is out of town and will not be back in until tomorrow.  This
   may cut it a little close as to getting everything back to you by Monday,
   the 27th.  Is there a possibility of getting this deadline pushed back a
   couple of days?  We are also having a problem getting a commitment from
the
   top management people - they are all out of town at present.  This does not
   involve very many - only 3 or 4 people, but we need to get a definate
count
   so that we won't be short on rooms.  If everyone can come, it looks like
we
   might need at least 39 rooms.

   We should be able to have everthything to you by the 29th - is this a
   problem?

Please let me know as soon as possible.

Thanks and have a great day!

Shirley Crenshaw
Telephone:     713-853-5290
Fax:     713-646-2503
E-Mail:        Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com


Jean, I believe you were out of the office on commodity close.  Who was reviewing
	the stack of reports on your desk?  Did we properly have the bases covered with
	you out?  Just trying to be sure we have the right coverage for accounting closes.

	Thanks. Lynn


Mike- I just spoke with fellow attorneys here in the Swap Group and was made
aware it would be more appropriate for Scott Sefton's group to handle the
drafting of an Agreement which entails Enron Corp. receiving all the assets
of the LJM Swap Sub and making a payment of $30 m. to LJM Equity Partners.

With respect to the Rhythms Net Options component, I have included below the
language which we discussed on the telephone. I would imagine this (or
something similar) would need to be included in the document that Scott's
group prepares.

I apologize for the mix-up.

Kind regards,

Shari Stack

____________________________

"Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Confirmations,
both Counterparty and Enron agree that Enron shall have the right to
prematurely terminate all the Transactions, in whole but not in part, on any
Exchange Business Day from and including March 8, 2000, to and including
April 28, 2000. If Enron wishes to terminate the Transactions, it may do so
by giving irrevocable written notice of such to Counterparty in accordance
with the 1996 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions (as published by the
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.).

If no such notice has been received by Counterparty at the close of trading
on the New York Stock Exchange on April 28, 2000, the Transactions shall be
deemed to have been automatically terminated on April 28, 2000, as of the
close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange."


[IMAGE]

 If you would rather not receive these messages, please  click here .  It will take up to 48 hours for your request to take effect.
All third party products and services promoted on this Site are offered exclusively by third party advertisers. Jackpot.com / Vendare Group makes no representations or warranties with respect to these offers and all claims for injury and damages related to such offers are the sole responsibility of the advertiser.


Attached are the 750 & 1000 MMcf/d cases we discussed earlier.  I've copied Doug Cybrek too so he will have the latest.

Ron Matthews


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Power Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Power Delivered on Friday, November  16, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Thursday, November  15, 2001)
Click here to access index history


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Birthdays in College Station

Date:		2/10/2001
Time:		12:00 PM - 6:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Bryan,

We shall be glad to  take a look at the system. To sign - off on the vendor
provided system we
have to look under the hood and review the algorithms. I hope the vendor will
have no objections to it.

Another critical issue we have to solve on a short notice is to integrate the
system you want to buy
with the rest of VaR/credit systems. We shall stand by to help in this
endeavor.

An alternative approach is to evaluate to what extent your positions can be
rolled into the existing risk systems.

Vince

Bryan Seyfried
11/10/2000 03:20 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: VaR for EnronCredit.com

Vince/Steve -- we are going to the Board in December to ask for formal
limits.  As you know one of the key limits at the Board level is Value at
Risk. To that end, it is imperative that you are comfortable with our
approach for calculating VaR.  We have implemented a third party risk system
which holds all of our positions and are in the process of putting the debt
positions in.  The system has a VaR engine which is being demo'd by the
vendor today.  Ben and Kirstee are attending the demo and if they find the
technology acceptable, I propose moving forward with implemantion of the
module.  Pls. let me know if this sounds reasonable and how you would
envision implementing.

thanks


why are there about 50 media people outside?  so did you miss me last night

-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Nelson, Michelle
Subject: RE:

yep what are you doing

-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject:

Are you at work?
Michelle Nelson
Enron Networks
713-345-8091
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Jeff, I am too simple to understand this!  What does removing the direct
access language do? I do not recognise the document from which it was removed
, hence I do not know whether this is bad or good for Enron! However from
your last statement - ' has no proposal before it implementing the
prohibition' - I am interpreting   that the implementation of the  Direct
Access prohibition is no longer on anyones agenda so that would be good for
Enron.
Hope you are still having fun!
Kathryn

The Commission just voted out one half of the "Bilas Alternate."

The decision that got voted out included Bilas' DWR-based language stating
that the PUC 1) would not second-guess DWR purchases and 2) would pass
through DWR costs to customers.
However, in a move led by Commissioner Carl Wood, the decision removed the
Bilas language on Direct Access.  The decision therefore did NOT include the
Bilas language staying any Commission action on implementing the Direct
Access prohibition.  Carl Wood called including Direct Access "the height of
arrogance."
The decision was voted out 3-2, with the 2 remaining Republicans dissenting.
That said, the Commission has no proposal before it implementing the
prohibition, and there was no talk at the meeting of implementing the
prohibition any time soon.

Best,
Jeff


The ISO filed a response at FERC to the PX's request to remove the hard cap
on adjustment bids and
replace it with a floating cap that would track the price of energy in the
market.

The ISO opposes the proposal arguing that it may produce extremely high
constrained Zonal market clearing
prices in the forward markets and may be subject to the exercise of market
power and to gaming.

The ISO suggests the PX fix this by anchoring its Adjustment Bids
(incremental and  decremental bids) prices
to the unconstrained market clearing price, as opposed to absolute Energy
bids.  In other words, the PX would
establish its constrained market clearing price as the sum of the
unconstrained market clearing price and the
Usage Charge resulting from the ISO,s Congestion Management process.

To effectuate this change, the PX would have to impose a new rule that
Adjustment Bids be within $125 of the
unconstrained market clearing price. The PX would then be required to process
the Adjustment Bids prior to
passing them on to the ISO. The PX would have to subtract the unconstrained
market clearing price from each
Adjustment Bid prior to submitting it to the ISO. The ISO would then utilize
these Adjustment Bids, as well as
those submitted by other Scheduling Coordinators, to run its Congestion
Management system. After the ISO
completes its  Congestion Management process, the ISO would then
"post-process" the Adjustment Bids
(add back the unconstrained market clearing price) for use by the PX in
establishing its constrained Zonal
Energy prices and, as needed, by the ISO in real-time Congestion Management.

The ISO says it does not intend, by presenting this alternative to the PX,s
proposal, to preclude consideration
of other solutions that may be presented by one or more of the utilities or
by the EOB.

The ISO also argued that the Commission should impose reporting requirements
on those entities who submit
Adjustment Bids in the ISO,s Congestion Management process.  It recommends
that the Commission require
the submission of all Adjustment Bids to the Commission, the ISO and the
EOB.  It also asked the Commission
to direct the PX Market Monitoring Unit, in concert with the ISO,s Department
of Market Analysis, to increase its
monitoring of Adjustment Bids and bids submitted in the PX forward Energy
markets for evidence of the
exercise of market power.

The ISO argues that the effect of the FERC's December 8 Order on supply
sufficiency in the ISO,s real time
Imbalance Energy market was immediate and beneficial.  It states the
following in support.  Although supply
in California is still very tight, after implementation of Amendment No. 33,
there were bids available in the ISO,s
"BEEP Stack" to address California,s real time balancing needs for the first
time in nearly a week. Immediately
after the order was issued 3000 to 5000 MW of Generation internal to
California and up to an additional 1990 MW
of imports became available to the ISO.  The following day there was only one
hour in which reserves dropped
below 6% and one hour in which reserves were as great as 10%. In addition, it
alleges that the implementation
of Amendment No. 33 has substantially relieved the burden which had
previously been placed on the ISO,s
operators by in-state Generators attempting to negotiate prices in real time
in response to ISO Dispatch instructions.

The ISO also requests that the Commission clarify its December 8 Order to
confirm that sellers submitting bids
above $250 in the ISO,s Imbalance Energy Market are required to report their
bids and provide cost information
on a weekly basis not only to the Commission, but also to the California
Electricity Oversight Board and the ISO.

The ISO requests clarification that the Commission intended to approve the
proposed December 12,
2000 effective date for the cost allocation elements of Amendment No. 33.


I suggest that you and I and Paul and Earline meet internally and decide which options make the most sense for Enron.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Monday, July 02, 2001 10:25 AM
To:	Bouillion, James L.
Cc:	'Mark Watts <mark.watts@wessexwater.co.uk>@ENRON'; John Garrison (E-mail)
Subject:	RE: Azurix Global Insurance Programme

Jim:    What do you think?   I would like to get you involved in this discussion to help us sort out the costs and pros/cons.
John:   I think we can get Jim Bouillion working with Mark to get this moving in the right direction.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mark Watts <mark.watts@wessexwater.co.uk>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Mark+20Watts+20+3Cmark+2Ewatts+40wessexwater+2Eco+2Euk+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, July 02, 2001 9:58 AM
To:	John Garrison (E-mail)
Cc:	Rod Hayslett (E-mail)
Subject:	Azurix Global Insurance Programme

John,

Wessex has to start work around now on next year's budget - one of the first
tasks for me to do is to come up with next years insurance costs.

I am proposing to cost this on the basis of reverting back to a standalone
insurance programme for Wessex as opposed to being part of the Azurix Global
Insurance Programme.  The main reasons for this are:

Following the hefty premium rise in 2001 the global programme is now on a
par with a standalone programme with regard premiums but more expensive
overall due to the much higher excess levels at Azurix.

Due to the above it could easily be argued that the global programme is not
offering best value for Wessex acting as a standalone company which of
course it must do under its licence - this causes potential 'RAG 5' problems
with the regulator.

The levels of coverage previously enjoyed by Wessex prior to the global
programme had been more than adequate for approximately 10 years.

If AZX assets are sold this year there may be no need for an Azurix
programme but to consider absorbing Wessex into any Enron programme will
probably only add to the problems above given that Wessex and Enron are such
diverse entities in terms of size, activities, locations and therefore
insurable risk.

Please could you confirm what I am proposing is OK with Enron.

Regards.

Mark Watts

Treasurer

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the Wessex Water IT Support Centre on:

44-1225-528888 or email support@wessexwater.co.uk

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************


Hey--how the hell are you?  Still having fun and living large in the big
apple?  Things are great on the prarie--Huskers are No. 1 in the nation (I'm
actually talking about college womens volleyball since I refuse to watch
professional Husker football) and wife and small chicks are doing great.  As
to SD firm, I've almost hired Lynn Jackson Schultz and LeBrun a couple of
times and then ended up not needing them.  I think its the biggest firm in SD
(big whoop)  and is pretty well thought of.  I went to college with a partner
in their Sioux Falls office named Jon Sogn.  He's a commercial litigator and
a pretty good guy.  Good luck and hope all goes well.  DF

"David N Schumeister" <dschumeister@shearman.com> on 09/18/2000 01:28:05 PM
To: dfossum@enron.com
cc:

Subject: South Dakota Counsel

---------------------- Forwarded by David N Schumeister/NY/NA/ShS on
09/18/2000
02:27 PM ---------------------------

Ruth Lipshitz
09/18/2000 01:44 PM

To:   New York - PR Partners, New York - PR Associates
cc:

Subject:  South Dakota Counsel

Can anyone please recommend a South Dakota counsel?

Thanks.

********************************NOTICE*************************************
This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client
communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential.  If you are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this
transmittal is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this transmittal
and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by
telephone (call us collect at +1 212-848-8400) and immediately delete this
message and all its attachments.

Thank you.


Can you help?

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Ralph, Susan <Susan.Ralph@ENRON.com>
To: Hayslett, Rod <Rod.Hayslett@ENRON.com>
Sent: Mon Nov 05 10:36:10 2001
Subject: further update

Rod  UDS has now asked for closer to $19.0 mil ( the trades are there to justify it)  andyway I understand that  the SCB agreement for cash is for $20,000,000....that means we are way over already!


Can you please let me know if there are any existing NDA's in place with
Morningstar Systems Inc. and Insource Techology Corporation.  Thank you!


Joe,  thanks for the info.....interesting "stuff" in here.   Glad you landed okay.  Good to hear from you.  Hope everything continues to go well for you in your new job.   "Scary" stuff going on in the industry right now....The attorney general's office is filing suit, tomorrow I think.  press release is being finalized as I am writing....  I hope we end up nameing Louise Kitchen and getting some of her compensation back!!!  I suspect we'll be fighting this ordeal for a while now..

Life is very good to me here....love my job, my home, and being in Austin.  Say hello to Dee Hagy for me...

Linda Roberts, Director
State Energy Marketing Program
Texas General Land Office
Energy Resources
1700 N. Congress Avenue
Austin, Texas  78701-1495

512-475-3196 - office
512-695-8871 - cell phone (no voice mail)
512-606-4141 - pager no.
512-475-1543 - fax
linda.roberts@glo.state.tx.us

>>> "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net> 06/18/02 12:10PM >>>
Hello, Linda. How are things? I have attached a document that contains a list that shows the amount of money paid out to traders before the Dynegy merger. I thought you would like to see it. It is on page 75 of the pdf file.

Joe

 <<ene.pdf>>

************************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. and/or its relevant affiliate(s) and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
************************************************************************


please calendar for me.  Thanks!!  You also should attend if you are
interested.  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 09:29
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Cynthia Barrow @ ENRON                           12/07/2000 05:30 PM

To: Ray Bennett/HOU/EES@EES, Dave Schafer/NA/Enron@ENRON, David
Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Janie
Bonnard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Sarah Davison/EU/Enron@Enron, Scott
Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gerry
Chatham/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob Sparger/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michelle
Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marla Barnard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Mary Joyce, Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Schwartz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brad
Coleman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kriste Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ryan
Seleznov/Corp/Enron@Enron, Suzanne Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa
Bosien/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Knudsen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elyse
Kalmans/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES,
Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann Vaughn/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mikie
Rath/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dolores Lenfest/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maryann Roman
de Meza/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gerry Gibson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Sally Alvarez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charla Stuart/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Moore/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark P Wilson/LON/ECT@ECT, Maryann Roman de
Meza/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Invitiation for input on naming of Enron's DayCare Center.

Sally Alvarez, Charla Stuart, Karen Moore and Mark Wilson have been working
on the development of concepts for the new Enron daycare center scheduled to
open the fall of 2001.  They have developed 3-5 alternatives and will be
holding open forum type focus groups on:

December 11th and 12th in room EB49C3 from 11 am to 1 pm.

If your schedule allows we would love to have you stop by and provide your
feedback.  In addition, if you know of employees within your companies that
would like to provide input please extend the offer to them.

Our Wellness group is also working with Karen Moore to develop potential new
names for the Body Shop.  If they are ready by the 11th, we will also solicit
input on these as well.

Thanks in advance for your help
Cb


Gerald:  Following up on your request, I had Michelle Carmody in our office
research and summarize Colorado and Utah cases regarding the duty to act in
good faith.  Attached is her memo.  As you can see, the doctrine offers the
potential for use in your situation, but particularly in Colorado there are
distinct limitations on its reach.

Let me know if this is what you need.

Craig
 <<memo re good faith.doc>>

 - memo re good faith.doc


Please provide Elizabeth Linnell with your responses.

Thank you.

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Linnell, Elizabeth
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 12:41 PM
To:	Dernehl, Ginger
Subject:	Information needs survey

Ginger - Please forward to Gov't Affairs group.  Thanks!

We're trying to identify information needs - both specific and general.  Many of these are already provided, and response to this survey will help in identifying new services and prioritizing/improving existing offerings.  Depending on the response to each offering, most will likely be made available.  For this effort, please rank up to five choices in the list below (1=highest).  We'll tally the results, identify which items will have priority and communicate back how those needs will direct implementation efforts.  Please note that items marked with (*) would require your input.  Please click on Forward for this message to allow you to type in your ranking numbers, and send the response to Rita Hartfield by Wednesday, October 17.

Thanks!
Elizabeth

(  )  Catalog of web resources.  [Including websites, electronic documents]

(  )  Catalog of Enron presentations and group member presentations.

(  )  Catalog of statistical data and information (some in slide format).  [Might include information like generation statistics, company information, various maps, customer migration data, and anything else of general interest and use.]

(  )   Individual access to in-depth research tools [Might include access to Lexis.com, market data tools like PowerDat, etc]  Most applications would require some level of training, and might involve subscription costs.

(  ) Primary research contact assigned by subject matter expertise..

(  )  *Up to the minute restructuring data.

(  )  *Enron formal documents [filings, comments, testimony]

(  )  Catalog of Enron internal position statements

(  )  Catalog of Enron public documents [policy talking points, handouts]

(  )  Ad-hoc research upon request.

(  )  News clipping services

(  )  *Group calendar of significant events with links to associated documents.

(  )  Catalog of print  publications that we currently own that would be available for loan [books, periodicals, studies]

(  )  Thumbnail analyses by industry experts on various topics

(   )   Other:

How much time per week are you willing to spend to contribute to certain items (marked with *):      hours


Please see the note from Elizabeth below.

RCR's are now on-line and should be submitted via this on-line format.
Please refrain from using the old form.

Thank you,

gngr
---------------------- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES on 10/19/99 04:35
PM ---------------------------

Elizabeth Linnell
10/18/99 05:01 PM
To: Joseph Alamo/SFO/EES@EES, Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Judy
Pearson/HOU/EES@EES, Laurie Knight/DUB/EES@EES, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcia
A Linton/HOU/EES@EES, Margo Reyna/HOU/EES@EES, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chauncy
Hood/DUB/EES@EES, Terri Miller/HOU/EES@EES, Gloria Solis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geriann
Warner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Earlene O'Connell/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jean R
Dressler/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: New Procedure for Projects/RCR's

Please see the attached Word document for directions on a new on-line
procedure for RCR's.  All RCR requests must now be submitted on-line through
the Project Tracking system.  To access the system, click on the first link
below, and a new icon will be added to your Lotus Notes desktop (it has a
picture of a globe).  (Don't click on the other two links, they'll be added
automatically.)    If you have any problems accessing the system, please call
me.  If you have any questions on entering the information, please call me or
Ginger.  Thanks!!

Click on this link  -->     > Gov Affairs
 > Projects
 > Contacts

Instructions:  -->