Dave:

FYI.

Leslie
----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 12:43 PM -----

	"Didizian, Marly" <marly.didizian@linklaters.com>
	10/17/2000 12:23 PM

		 To: "'leslie.hansen@enron.com'" <leslie.hansen@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Data Protection

> Dear Leslie
>
> Further to our telephone conversation today, I set out below our advice on
> use of the email adddresses of contestants in the Olympic online game to
> inform such contestants of the World Series game.
>
> From a UK data protection point of view, such use would be "processing" of
> personal data for the purposes of the Data Protection Act 1998. Processing
> is only permissible under the Act if it satisfies one of the relevant
> conditions. One such condition, and the best in terms of avoiding
> ambiguity, is getting the "consent" of the data subject. This is not
> applicable here as the consent wording used in the Olympic game rules
> covers only use in the context of administering that game. We have
> discussed alterations to such wording for the World Series game which we
> will pass on to the relevant foreign counsel for their opinion.
>
> Another relevant condition which may be of use here is that the
> "processing is necessary for the purposes of legitimate interests pursued
> by the data controller or by the third party or parties to whom the data
> are disclosed, except where the processing is unwarranted in any
> particular case by reason of prejudice to the rights and freedoms or
> legitimate interests of the data subject".
>
> I think this relevant condition would allow you to use the contestants'
> email addresses to inform them of the World Series game as this would be
> pursuing Enron's legitimate interests and is very unlikley to prejudice
> the contestants in any way given in particular that it would not oblige
> them to play the game or wager any money.
>
> I should reiterate that this advice is limited to UK law. The data
> protection legislation in other EU member states is similar to the UK's as
> it is based on the EU-wide Data Protection Directive. However, this
> Directive has been implemented in slightly different ways in the various
> jurisdictions. We will check with them that the answer is the same, and
> also ask the question of the Swiss lawyers.
>
> I hope the above is helpful, at least in emailing the contestants based in
> the UK.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Marly Didizian

____________________________________________________________

This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or
otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal
rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know
by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not
copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
____________________________________________________________


Rob, Andy Fastow is the only one who has not signed the DASH.  He may have a
few questions please give him a call.  Otherwise, Kay Chapman and/or Mark
Frank have the DASH.  I have signed.

Regards
Delainey


Vince,

LIBERTY GAS STORAGE PROJECT - We appreciated the insight from Zimin Lu on the
Liberty Gas Storage project.  I had originally thought that Enron could
negotiate a deal directly with HNG Storage Co. on the joint development of
these facilities.  However, HNGS has now retained Wasserstein Pirella to
"market" the opportunity.  [FYI - Wasserstein was the Investment Banker that
handled the recent sale of the Market Hub Partners storage facilities, so
they certainly would have a current list of interested parties.]
Unfortuneately, we will now have to participate in another "auction" if we
are to pursue this further.  I'll let you know what we decide to do.

ALASKA / NORTHERN CANADA PIPELINE - I would like to discuss ways that Enron
might enhance our prospect of participating in the initiative to bring
substantial new gas reserves from Alaska and northern Canada to the lower
48.  A large equity investment in a very expensive, regulated pipeline is not
likely to get much support within Enron.  Instead, our competitive advantage
may best be realized through the efficient and creative utilization of the
existing US pipeline grid, ("backhaul" on Northern Natural, expansion
opportunities on Northern Border and NNG, or even capacity exchanges with
other pipeline operators).

I think it would be very useful if we had the capability to model the impact
of the evolving North American marketplace on that initiative, and vice
versa.  Any insight we could develop on who will be the eventual "winners"
and "losers" if / when that large volume of new gas enters the market would
be valuable.

I will look forward to our discussion tomorrow (Thursday) at 1:30 PM.

Regards, JNG


With the forms relocation, forms list.doc needs to be revised to reflect
their new location.


Notes for this Week's Report:

* UK Power,s average deals per day finished April with 13 EOL deals and is
now showing 14 daily transactions in May, down from March,s 59 EOL deals.
Non-EOL,s average transactions have increased dramatically, however, ending
April with 180 deals per day and currently tracking at 244 deals in early
May.  While transactions are down, EOL and Non-EOL volume is up during this
same period.

* UK Gas,s Average EOL and Non-EOL deals per day have decreased since their
peak of 140 EOL and 96 Non-EOL transactions in March. They ended April with
an average of 118 EOL deals per day and are currently tracking at 76
transactions in May. Non-EOL is reporting at 82 deals per day in May.

* US West Power's average transactions per day has increased to 184 EOL deals
in May, up from 80 deals per day in January, a 130% increase. Non-EOL daily
transactions has increase from 206 to 231 deals during the same period..

* Southwest Power's EOL transactions per day has continued to increase in
2001. On average, they ended January with 26 EOL trades and now show 70 daily
transactions in May, a 169% increase. Non-EOL transactions have slightly
increased during this same period, up from 68 in January to 84 in May.

* WTI Physical's total monthly transactions already show 85 EOL deals through
the first 12 trading days in May.  This mid-month total is up from April's
total of 60 EOL deals.

* US Weather's total monthly transactions has shown a jump in May with 35
deals via EOL, up from 23  in April and 15 in March. Non-EOL deal totals are
down to 19 deals in May from 52 in March.

---------------
The following files contain a graphical view of the average deal count and
volumes per month by Commodity for EOL and OTC transactions since the launch
of EnronOnline. This information is for comparative analysis only.  Do not
update links when opening these files.

AVERAGE DEAL COUNTS FOR COMMODITIES (excluding Global Products, which
displays monthly totals)

If you have any questions regarding this breakout, please contact one of the
following:

Torrey Moorer x3-6218
Matt Motsinger x3-5221
Adam Johnson x5-4877


Hi Vince,
I am enclosing my resume, as per our most recent conversation.
Best regards,
Bogdan M. Szopa

 - BOGDAN  res..doc


Attached is a discussion draft of the Compression Services Agreement for
Gallup.


Bowen brought up the FERC order on 4 RTOs issued today. She said this
ratchets everything else up in the state and what they want to do on buying
the state transmission lines.

I heard Peace mutter just then; "Ken Lay is behind that."

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


Given the current tremendous energy market volatility and as we stretch
resources to make our commercial goals for 2000, we think it would be
appropriate to postpone the ENA 2000 Offsite to early next year.  I trust
this meets with your approval and thanks for all the hard work.

Regards
Dave and John


Jerry,

Thanks.  I'll give it a look immediately, and will discuss the game plan with
Heather.

Congratulations on wrapping up the alliance and associated agreements.  Looks
like an interesting and exciting opportunity for both companies.

Kay


Thanks for your homework on this.  We will definitely take a look at these
two places next week while we are in London.  Let us know what we need to do
to schedule this.  I look forward to meeting you.  One of your earlier
messages suggested meeting on Monday morning.  Monday is great, but we would
have to make that an afternoon meeting.  Brent and I will be on the flight
that leaves Houston at 7:00 PM on Sunday evening, arriving at Gatwick around
10:00 AM.  By the time we clear customs, take the train, check in to the
hotel and shower, we will not be in the office before 12:30 or 1:00.  Do you
have a time available to meet with us that afternoon?   Thanks.  --Sally

Tara Rozen
03/13/2000 04:24 AM
To: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jane Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Accommodation

Brent/Sally

I have two options available below. I have not seen these apartments,
however, so would recommend that you both have a look when you arrive next
week. Please let me know if you find these suitable. Neither of them are
located in South Kensington or Chelsea but I think you will find that
Kensington and Marylebone are also very nice, close to parks and high
streets, etc.   Also, is Fernley the person from whom I should seek approval
for costs of accommodation and per diems or is Houston picking up these
charges?

Kensington High Street - We have a block of apartments here that offer
accommodation of a high standard. They will have a newly  refubished
spacious flat free with 3 bathrooms, 24 hour porterage, Mon-Fri maid
service, and an underground car parking space included.

Please however note that this flat will not be free until the 03rd or 04th
of April.

OR

Baker Street W1 - Spacious 3 bedroom flat in porteraged block close to the
station. This flat has been newly decorated and re-carpeted throughout. One
double bedroom with bathroom ensuite and 2 bedrooms with 2 single beds in
each. Fully equipped kitchen and comfortable lounge.

Regards
Tara


POSREP HOEGH GALLEON, DATE:	10-May	12:00	9:00	(UTC)
A) Position at noon:	N	12 25	E	044 29
B) Dist. From last noon:	443	nm
C) Dist. To go to next port:	1199	nm
D) ETA next port:	Qalhat	13 0900	LT
E) 1: Average sea/wind	Sea:	SW 4	Wind:	SW 3
    2: Average speed	18.46	kn	RPM: 92.67
    3: BOG consumed	0	m3
    4: BOG Total	0	m3
    5: F.O Consumed	164	m3
    6: G.O. Consumed	0	m3

Brgds Knut Bentzr?d
Master LNG/C "Hoegh Galleon"

E-mail: master.gall@hoegh.no
Teleph: Inmarsat tel.no.+873 330853910
Fax   : Inmarsat fax no.+873 330853913
Telex : Inmarsat B telex no.+583 330853915
Telex : Inmarsat C telex no.+583 430853910 (24hrs.watch)


If they can figure out a way to do it, more power to them - but there are
only just so many characters available in the short description line.

	Greg Johnston
	03/12/2001 02:18 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Lon Draper/CAL/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Option Language

Mark, you are right on the second point.  I think we are probably okay
there.  I understand from our option traders that they intend to set the
products themselves up on EOL to address the different calculations in the
products themselves rather than coming up with different long descriptions
for each.  Does that make any sense or should we be setting up separate long
descriptions for each of the types of options they want to offer?

From: Mark Taylor on 03/12/2001 01:28 PM CST
To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Lon Draper/CAL/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Option Language

Greg:

It looks like Melba sent you an example of a put.  There is nowhere else on
the website to explain the different calculations so they use the identical
Long Description except for that one clause to differentiate between puts and
calls.  So far there have not been any collars, straddles, etc. offered.

On the second change, it looked to me like the preceding sentence already
covers the treatment of holidays:

...at the end of such day (normally being 4:05 p.m. (MPT)) on EnronOnline (or
for Saturdays, Sundays and statutory holidays, at the end of the day on the
preceding business day)...

which makes the deleted language redundant.

	Greg Johnston
	03/12/2001 11:30 AM

		 To: Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Lon Draper/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Option Language

Melba, I have reviewed the proposed changes and I do not believe that they
should be made.  The change to the calculation of the Cash Settlement Amount
to specify it is the Strike Price minus the Index doesn't work unless the
option is a put.  We want this long description to work for all options
(puts, calls, collars, etc.) and for each of those the calculation of the
Cash Settlement Amount is different.  That is the reason that we originally
put in the generic language that the Cash Settlement Amount is "the greater
of zero or the amount calculated as set forth on the Website", such that the
actual calculation mechanism for the Cash Settlement Amount will be set forth
in each specific product.  Therefore, I would suggest we change it back to
the original wording.

On the second change, I know that the wording that was removed is important
to our traders.  If the description is silent on holiday pricing (which will
be the case if we make the suggested change), I am not sure as to what the
default is.  We need to make sure that the default where the pricing for
holidays is not specified is exactly the same as the wording removed,
otherwise the wording removed needs to be put back in.  I am also not clear
on why we would remove the wording in the first place and create any
uncertainty as to holiday pricing.

Thanks
Greg

To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Lon Draper/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Option Language

Greg,

Attached please find the language for the Option products.  I need final
approval from you. Changes were suggested by Mark Taylor.

Thansk,

Melba


Linda:
Could you please give Suzanne one so she can send it to me at home?  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Linda J Noske
	11/10/00 10:45 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha
Braddy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron,
Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Bob
Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ned E
Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela
Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Elliott/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT,
Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert H
George/NA/Enron@Enron, Johan Gerrese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
James Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron,
Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Karen E Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Matthias
Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Francisco Pinto Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah MacDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt,
Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice
R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Coralina Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart
Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony
Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Merrill W Haas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed
B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt
Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Margaret Doucette/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Angeline
Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Kelly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Holly
Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp 1/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny
Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Jan M King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria
Cruz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Nicola Beales/LON/ECT@ECT, Nina Edmonds/LON/ECT@ECT,
Silvia Dalton/SA/Enron@Enron, Tracy Foy/LON/ECT@ECT, MaryHelen
Martinez/NA/Enron@Enron, Luciana Rinaldi/SA/Enron@Enron, Carolyn
George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheri L Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlotte
Christmas/LON/ECT@ECT, Connie Castillo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Law Conference Binders

Sheri Cromwell and I will be sorting through the binders that were left in
the Houston Room after the conference.  If you left your binder on the table
and never got it back, please let me know immediately if you need one.  We
are in the process of cleaning up all the extras as we do not have the room
to store this material.

Again, please let me know as soon as possible!


Next Tuesday, December 19th, the 50th floor will be open to all employees for
the Annual Holiday Open House from 3:00pm until 5:00pm.  Similar to last
year, we will provide food, beverage and musical entertainment and will also
decorate eight executive offices to reflect the Festival of Lights.  Our goal
is to expose our employees to different celebrations around the world and
simultaneously demystify the 50th floor.

For your reference, the offices that will be decorated are listed below:
St. Lucia - Ken Lay
Kwaanza - Jeff Skilling
Los Posadas - Rob Walls
Chinese New Year - Cindy Olson
Hanukkah - Andy Fastow
Ramadan - Rick Buy
Devali - Rick Causey
Christmas - Jim Derrick

We would welcome Executive Committee members to volunteer to greet employees
in the 50th floor elevator lobby or serve punch.   Time slots are available
in 15-minute increments from 3:00pm to 5:00pm.  Please reply to this e-mail
if you would like to volunteer for this event and I will provide additional
information for your reference at that time.

This annual affair is an employee favorite and you may contact me with any
comments or questions.

Charla Reese
Manager, Community Relations
x35202


you didn't send the number.  just call me on mine @ 7138258410.  i am
thinking tealas and sitting out on the porch.


Mark,

As you requested, below is a list of my major accomplishments for the year.

1. Resolution/management of pre-litigation and litigation matters,
including:  Dwayne Hart/Utilicorp; Satterwhite; Barrington; Race/Statoil;
Ross Malme; Rick Blandford; West Boettcher; Anita Suson; Charlie Weymms;
Steven Cuneo; others.

2.  Efficient management of drafting, negotiating, revising, and completing
several types of contracts in numerous different jurisdictions (e.g., almost
200 employment agreements, 35 separation agreements, and 30 consulting
services agreements).

3. Lead attorney on Project One (which involves issues surrounding the
OFCCP's "glass ceiling" audit of ENA and all of Enron).

4. Labor and employment transactional support, including:  East Coast Power,
Ecogas, CGas, Project Hurricane, Columbia, Project Grizzly, Las Vegas Cogen,
and other acquisitions that involve the transfer or hiring of personnel. Many
of these transactions require extensive legal support relating to personnel
matters after closing.

5. Legal support on labor (union) matters, including successful closing of
project labor agreements for the construction of generation assets (e.g.,
Pittsburg, 2000 peakers, Pastoria), Unfair Labor Practice matters, training
on union-related issues in M&A's.

Let me know if you need any more information, and thanks for your support!

Michelle


Lou-
I think the previous numbers are a bit low now. In December, 1999, we
installed four downgradient monitor wells on off-site property owned by the
Nature Conservancy. Samples from these wells confirm a contaminant plume of
arsenic in the shallow groundwater emanating from the release area. Another
development is the recent accumulation of product in some of our recovery
wells that is different in characteristic from what we were previously
dealing with. This indicates that we are possibly pulling in product from
another source that we have not yet identified (although I suspect a nearby
sump location as the culprit). We have another drilling program in the works
for this year to further delineate the downgradient extent of the arsenic
plume and to evaluate the other potential source of accumulated product. This
work is tentatively scheduled for the latter part of August or September.
Please let me know if this schedule should be accelerated or deferred due to
a pending sale agreement. Another consideration related to off-site
contamination, the Railroad Commission has not yet requested that NNG notify
affected property owners, but I suspect that such a request is forthcoming. I
am in the process of preparing a letter, addressed to you, identifying the
affected property located between the facility and the Nature Conservancy
property.

In light of these considerations and the continued interest by the Railroad
Commission, I have adjusted the spending forecast as follows:
2000    $100k
2001    $100k
2002    $60k
2003    $20k
2004    $20k
2005+  $20k
Total   $320,000+
Notes regarding this forecast:
1) This should be viewed as an optimistic forecast (i.e., if everything goes
fairly well).
2) No $ are included in this forecast for managing off-site property issues
that may arise.
3) Assumes that a second source area is confirmed and additional recovery
wells will be installed next year to recover PSH from this area.
4) Assumes that the existing recovery system will be adequate for continued
operations.
5) Assumes that the recovery system continues to operate through 2002.
6) Assumes that the Railroad Commission will continue to renew the minor
permit for disposal of recovered liquids.
7) Assumes that quarterly groundwater sampling will continue at least through
2005.

07/17/2000 05:58 PM
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
07/17/2000 05:58 PM
07/17/2000 05:58 PM
To: lsoldano@wt.net, George Robinson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Herber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kim Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Gomez PSA

george - how would you value to the GW problem at Gomez??  I took a look at
some old notes (Oct 1999) and we had the following:

2000    $80k
2001    $30K
2002    $20k

what do you think???

---------------------- Forwarded by Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron on 07/17/2000
05:53 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kim Wilkie                           07/17/2000 04:49 PM

To: Stephen Herber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Gomez PSA

Steve, after talking to Lou, we have a couple of choices:  (1) you could tell
them that they have to assume the groundwater problem (based on the value of
the property, do you think they priced it into their offer?), (2) we can
specifically retain the groundwater issue as we previously discussed or (3)
we can remain silent on the issue and assume that they will include it in
their environmental compliance report ( the only problem with this choice is
that they have a termination right if title defects plus environmental
compliance issues exceed 5.0% of the purchase price - basically this would
give them a free out since this is probably a $250,000 problem that they
already know about).   The attached draft assumes you will choose (2) since
that is what we have been discussing all along.

Please call me if you have any questions.  As I mentioned on your voicemail,
I have an appointment out of the office in the morning and may or may not
work out of the house after that.   Regardless, I will have the document with
me and can talk it over with you or make changes as you see appropriate.  My
number at home is 713-664-7472.

Thanks, Kim


Thanks, I am waiting on our credit dept.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Dicaprio, Angela" <ADicapri@utilicorp.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:38 AM
To:	'dperlin@enron.com'
Subject:	Aquila Dallas Notice information for Enfolio Master Firm Agreemen	t with ENA
Importance:	High

Hi Debra:

Per my telephone call today. Below is the notice information for the Enfolio
Master Firm Agreement, as it applies to Aquila Dallas Marketing, L.P.

Customer:  Aquila Dallas Marketing, L.P.

Notices/Correspondence/Confirmations

2711 N. Haskell, Suite 2050
Dallas, TX 75204
Telephone: 816/527-1187
Facsimile: 816/527-1143

Invoices

2711 N. Haskell, Suite 2050
Dallas, TX 75204
Telephone:  214/827-9464
Facsimile: 214/828-2709

Payments

Wire to:  The Northern Trust Company
	ABA# 071000152
	Acct# 24570

Nominations:
2711 N. Haskell, Suite 2050
Dallas, TX 75204
Telephone:  214/827-9464
Facsimile: 214/827-2718

Debra:  In addition to the above, the threshold language should be changed
to reflect $5M.  Once you have made the appropriate changes, duplicating the
AEM/ENA Enfolio Agreement for Aquila Dallas and ENA, forward an electronic
copy to me and I will print it in duplicate and obtain execution
expeditiously.

If you have any questions, please call me at 816/527-1325.

Thanks so much for attention to this matter.


Avinash,

Please, contact Zimin Lu.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jain, Avinash
Sent:	Monday, May 21, 2001 5:45 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Cc:	Ballard, Phillip
Subject:	LIBOR Calculation

Mr. Kaminski,

We (Energy Capital Resources) are trying to put together a model in Excel that will calculate a LIBOR swap rate given cashflows from our Volumetric Production Payments. The trading desk says your group might have some models that were used to approved their trading system. Do you have anything that can help with this?

Avinash Jain


Attached is the agenda for the SW Region Director meetings scheduled for February 21-22, 2002.

	Those of you on the agenda for Thursday, Feb. 21, you are all welcomed to stay for lunch.

	Have a great 3 day weekend!

         Melinda Gallishaw
           Enron Transportation Services
         Southwest Operations
         Loc:  ECN4517
         Tel:   713-853-7688
         Fax:  713-646-4808
  melinda.gallishaw@enron.com


If you are unable to view this email please cut and paste the following url into your browser:  http://www.herters.com/email/hemail_mod.html

 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]

If you received this e-mail in error or would like to make changes, click here  or go to http://www.herters.com/email/listindex.html  to make changes or remove your subscription.


An exhibit...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/06/2001 12:23
PM ---------------------------

Dale Rasmussen@ECT
03/06/2001 12:05 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: ENRON - Meeting - Training Scope

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001
10:02 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com>
02/28/2001 09:15 AM

To: "Dale Rasmussen (E-mail)" <Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com>
cc: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Pipitone, Paul"
<paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris" <chriscobb@akllp.com>
Subject: FW: ENRON - Meeting - Training Scope

 Attached is Exhibit H-2.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 7:07 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: FW: ENRON - Meeting - Training Scope

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/21/2000
06:06
PM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 12/21/2000 04:25:08 PM

To:   kay.mann@enron.com
cc:   john.r.ayres@enron.com

Subject:  FW: ENRON - Meeting - Training Scope

I'm forwarding this per my conversion with John Ayres as the Training
insert
H-2

> -----Original Message-----
> From:         Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
> Sent:         Friday, March 17, 2000 3:50 PM
> To:           'kathleen.clark@enron.com'; 'michael.d.nanny@enron.com'
> Cc:           Davis, David F (PS, SSEP); Kuo, Kathy (PS, SSEP);
> 'chris.booth@enron.com'
> Subject:           FW: ENRON - Meeting - Training Scope
>
>
> Kathy/Mike-
>
> Attached is our latest Training Course agenda.  Since our Engine and
> Packaging businesses are now organized as one, we've combined the
Engine
> Familiarization and Generator Set Operator Training Courses into a
single
> Training Course.  We would envision providing this training at each
> Facility Site.
>
> This outline should be used to replace the language in Exhibit H-2 to
> accurately describe the current course agenda.  We'll discuss the
content
> in detail on Tuesday with Mike, to be sure that nothing is dropped
from
> the Training content.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lee
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:         Kuo, Kathy (PS, SSEP)
> Sent:         Thursday, March 16, 2000 11:12 AM
> To:           Roy Allice (E-mail)
> Cc:           Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
> Subject:           ENRON - Meeting - Training Scope
>
> Roy,
>
> 1.  MEETING INFORMATION:
> Who:          Enron, Lee Johnson, Kathy Kuo, Roy Allice
> Where:        Downtown Houston. 3 Allen Center, 333 Clay St., Suite
400
> (sign in).
> When:         1:30 PM - ?  (Lee Johnson to confirm)
>
>
> 2.  Attached is the file David Davis sent to Lee for Enron Training
Scope.
> Note that it is the 5-day Basic Op.
>
>  <<Training LM6000.pdf>>
>
> 3.  Please confirm (per our discussion this morning) that you will be
able
> to attend this meeting.  If not, please let me know if there is
someone
> that can attend in your place.
>
>
> Thanks!
> Kathy
(See attached file: Training LM6000.pdf)

 - Training LM6000.pdf


----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2001 02:14 PM -----

	sschneider@aep.com
	06/11/2001 11:16 AM

		 To: mlcarriere@aep.com
		 cc: washeridan@aep.com, nscocavessis@aep.com, dan.j.hyvl@enron.com,
ragreen1@aep.com
		 Subject: Re: additional contracts

Here are the new contract forms to utilize.  Stepheny Augustus will be
responsible to create the necessary contracts and to approve all
contractual rates as invoices are received.  Please coordinate with
Stepheny to have all contracts created.

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Schneider/HO1/AEPIN on
06/11/2001 11:12 AM ---------------------------

Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com on 06/11/2001 09:12:16 AM

To:   sschneider@aep.com
cc:

Subject:  Re: additional contracts

Please review the four which I have changed from Enron Company to Houston
Pipe Line Company.  Call if you need anything further.  I intend to be over
there next Monday.

(See attached file: 2001-AFS Form.doc)(See attached file: 2001-ESA
Form.doc)(See attached file: Apsblank.doc)(See attached file: Msablank.doc)
(See attached file: 2001-AFS Form.doc)
(See attached file: 2001-ESA Form.doc)
(See attached file: Apsblank.doc)
(See attached file: Msablank.doc)

 - 2001-AFS Form.doc
 - 2001-ESA Form.doc
 - Apsblank.doc
 - Msablank.doc


Call 800-998-2462, pin code #629012


How about my RRSP contributions for this year?

Chris


With regard to Lisa's comments, consider the following:

What is the per UNIT turbine purchase amount? - the Unit Liability
Amount

in the 2nd para. of 5.4 Cancellation and in 6.1.3 Retention Letter(s) of
Credit for example,
each UNIT is discussed. - This is the way each breakout agreement was
set up.  Cancellation is to be on a Unit basis, which is why Exhibit I
refers to percentages of the Unit Liability Amount. Retention was also
to be 5% of the purchase amount of each Unit - $788,500.   This should
probably be $788,486.25, so that 4 Units multiplied by 788,486.25 =
$3,153,945 (the final payment amount) I had just rounded up.

Also, how does anyone know for 6.1.3 when the last $788,500
per Turbine is supposed to be paid so we can retain it? -Section 6.1.2
states that the final payment is subject to Section 6.1.3.  The final
payment is due January 21, 2002.

As to why we don't define "Purchase Amount" as the total actual amount
expended, I leave that for you to explain to Lisa.

As for the need to change the dates in 6.1.2 and Exhibit I, that is up
to the business folks.

Call me if you want to discuss.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bills, Lisa [mailto:Lisa.Bills@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 4:20 PM
To: Williams, Bill; Thome, Stephen; Gilbert, Jim; Thompson, Peter J.;
Rasmussen, Dale; Clark, Ed
Cc: Engeldorf, Roseann; Tweed, Sheila; Clark, Catherine; Kerrigan,
Brian; Mann, Kay
Subject: LV Cogen Turbine Contract

Rose and I have reviewed the contract Peter sent to us yesterday - the
draft distributed on April 24.  Rose has already provided our comments
to Peter on the Override Letter which accompanies the contract.  I have
one big issue which the lawyers can't answer as it is a business
decision.  No one seems sure if Bill is the acting originator for this
contract or not.  I leave it up to the LV Cogen Origination team to
decide.  However, until I receive word back from the appropriate person
and see my changes reflected in the turbine contract, Finance has not
signed off on this agreement so it cannot be executed on E-Next's
behalf.

What is the per UNIT turbine purchase amount?  The Purchase Amount is a
remaining total balance outstanding.  In 6.1.2 Payment Schedule, the
payment amount is a lump sum.  However, in the 2nd para. of 5.4
Cancellation and in 6.1.3 Retention Letter(s) of Credit for example,
each UNIT is discussed.  There needs to be an allocation of the Purchase
Amount and Payment Amount on a per turbine basis so Finance can track
these costs as such in case a change order is made to only one turbine
or if a turbine is removed from E-Next prior to all turbines being
removed.  Also, how does anyone know for 6.1.3 when the last $788,500
per Turbine is supposed to be paid so we can retain it?

Also, I would appreciate receiving a clarification of why we don't
define the Purchase Amount as the total and not just the balance
remaining.  It could create discrepancies in the document and for
anybody reading the document trying to understand how much each turbine
costs.  E-Next has already made the approx $10mm payments made to-date.
However, if someone were to pick up the document to find out how much
they could buy the turbines for, it would appear to be $53.6mm not the
Maximum Liability Amount of $63.1mm.  2nd para of 5.4 refers to the
portion of the Purchase Amount to be adjusted upon cancellation.
However, Exhibit I Cancellation refers to the Unit Liability Amount as
the basis for calculation - this seems inconsistent to me.

Now for the general comments:

Section 1.69 and 1.70 need to change places to be alphabetically
correct.

6.1.2 calls for a payment to be made on April 21, 2001.  Exhibit I
Cancellation also has a line for cancellation between March 21 and April
20, 2001.  This will need to be amended as this payment wasn't made
given no contract execution yet.  As everyone knows also, E-Next must be
the party to make this payment to insure the correct accounting
treatment.

6.5 is another place where a per Unit price is discussed for increases
or decreases.  How is this possible with an aggregate Purchase Amount?

In all Notice sections please delete "c/o Las Vegas Cogeneration II,
L.L.C."  This project is not associated with the E-Next financing.

10.2.3.1 Please underline "Optional Delivery Point"

10.12.2  Please delete the " ' " in "it's" after the proviso.

10.15  The timing of 120 days for delivery of serial numbers herein is
inconsistent with the bracketed 5 months in 10.2.1 and Exhibit P.
Please conform all to the same time frame.

Has David Marshall reviewed all the insurance provisions of this
document.  While a standard turbine contract, there have been some
recent modifications/views from our insurance providers.

I look forward to hearing back from the deal team and reviewing the next
round of documents.


Group,

Yesterday 11 /11 and this morning  11/12  the ISO cut one of our schedules
where Enron was exporting from SP 15, to NOb more specifically the schedule
looks like this: CISO-EPMI-SCL. Per Sean Crandall starting tomorrow and
forward we will not allow the ISO to cut our schedules UNTIL  all the OTHER
nonfirm schedules are cut FIRST. This is made possible by new FTRs that Chris
Mallory scheduled on the Sp/NOB path.

As a result of having firm transmission rights If the ISO calls and cuts one
of our schedules at NOB we need to make sure  and ask the ISO that the other
nonfirm  schedules are cut first then we can accept our cut.

For any further questions on this matter contact Sean Crandall or Chris
MAllory

thanks
Monika


They must be sick hearing about Enron by now
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 09/08/2000 12:17
PM ---------------------------

US Publishing <season@restructuringtoday.com> on 09/08/2000 10:28:58 AM
Please respond to season@restructuringtoday.com
To: "RT Reader" <season@restructuringtoday.com>
cc:
Subject: Restructuring Today, Friday September 8, 2000

(see attached file:  rt000908.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
1-800-486-8201
www.restructuringtoday.com
season@restructuringtoday.com

 - rt000908.pdf


CALENDAR ENTRY:	REMINDER

Description:
	Russell on call

Date:		5/12/2001
Time:		8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Greg,

I realize that Liz forwarded you my thanks, but I wanted to make sure to say
thank you directly for taking the time with me last week.

I look forward to speaking again in the future.

-Tim
______________________________
Tim Healy T'02
603/643-7603


Thats Just a damn fine deal!!! C'mon Fenner-Weiner, nut up and bring the
goods to big daddy...

PIGGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 3:23 PM
To: jmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; knipe3@aol.com;
cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Joe.Parks@enron.com;
kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Brian Constantine
Subject: Good News, Lease Signed

Well, you never know...
Got back into the office today after taking two days off with Sheila and

family in Fredricksburg to find a thick envelope from Mertz Ranch
Company
buried in my "in box". Did not know what to expect, had visions of Mertz

mailing it back with a note saying forget it.
Instead, the lease was signed and dated and had a nice note saying
"thanks".

Go figure.

We've got a lease for four more years. Same deal, same contract as the
last
three years, just 6K more a year. Price remains the same this year. next

year it is 2k a year per spot and we will need to add one spot. Still
waiting on Chet. Would like to know who McCombs would suggest if Chet
does
not commit. Lease requires Mertz to spent 2k a year on protien feed. He
and
I can agree in writing to reduce or increase that amount with a
corresponding reduction or increase in lease cost. Term is April 1, 2002
to
April 1 2005; exclusive right to hunt turkey and deer, spring turkey
starting the third weekend in april.

I'm pleased. Hope you are, too.

Erik.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Hi Carol,

I spoke to Ginette Berthel at Maclaren Energy, regarding your e-mail.

Regarding point #2 below, Maclaren would like its cross default threshold
amount to be US $50 million.  They are fine with the Enron threshold being
at US $100 million.

Regarding the CSA, since Great Lakes Power is giving a $12 million parental
guarantee, the collateral threshold amount for Maclaren should be $12
million.  Your e-mail below states that Enron' parent will be giving a $30
million parental guarantee.  My understanding is that this guarantee was to
be $15 million.  Regardless, I believe that Maclaren is only willing to
accept $15 million of credit risk from both Enron entities.  Therefore, the
threshold amount should be $15 million.

Please e-mail or call me to discuss.

Regards,
Michael Akkawi
416-865-8122

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:55 PM
To: makkawi@torys.com
Cc: Stephanie.Panus@enron.com; Edward.Sacks@enron.com
Subject: Maclaren ISDA

Michael:
I spoke with Ed Sacks, our credit person, and here is a summary of where we
stand on responding to your mark-up:

1.   Rider 1 is okay.
2.   No change will be made to the Threshold Amount.
3.   Early Termination Payments will be calculated using the Loss Method as
this is Enron's current policy.
4.   Riders 2, 3 and 4 and your changes to pages 2 and 9 of the ISDA
Schedule are okay.
No chnages to the CSA Schedule will be made.

With respect to the Guarantys, we have received the Great Lakes $12 million
Guaranty and Enron's Guaranty will be amended to increase the cap to $30
million and we will add your language.

Please confirm that all of this is okay with Maclaren.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Rick,  as a followup to our conversation about a month ago I just want to summarize where we are on the sale of EOGIL and the steps we are taking for corporate approvals as we move toward closing.   We are currently anticipating project close on July 27th, but as with all things associated with India the date will probably slide some.  Here'e what we are planning to do for Corp approval.  1) Steve Harper is working with Brad Larson to get a RAC document completed along the lines of the package we prepared for the China sale last month. This should be completed early next week and either your group or Steve will get it circulated for sign-offs.  2) We (Detmering/Sherrick) will review the project with Skilling/Lay prior to Rac sign-off.

Based on our last discussion, we will not need board approval for this sale since it is less than $500 million.  If this is not correct, let me know ASAP.  Otherwise, we will do the above and plan to close on July 27th.

Thanks
jeff


Executive Impact & Influence Program
* IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED - Do Not Delete *

As part of the Executive Impact and Influence Program, each participant
is asked to gather input on the participant's own management styles and
practices as experienced by their immediate manager, each direct report,
and up to eight peers/colleagues.

You have been requested to provide feedback for a participant attending
the next program.  Your input (i.e., a Self assessment, Manager assessment,
Direct Report assessment, or Peer/Colleague assessment) will be combined
with the input of others and used by the program participant to develop an
action plan to improve his/her management styles and practices.

It is important that you complete this assessment
NO LATER THAN CLOSE OF BUSINESS Thursday, September 14.

Since the feedback is such an important part of the program, the participant
will be asked to cancel his/her attendance if not enough feedback is
received.  Therefore, your feedback is critical.

To complete your assessment, please click on the following link or simply
open your internet browser and go to:

http://www.fsddatasvc.com/enron

Your unique ID for each participant you have been asked to rate is:

Unique ID - Participant
EQC4WU - John Arnold
EQMVJ3 - Hunter Shively

If you experience technical problems, please call Dennis Ward at
FSD Data Services, 713-942-8436.  If you have any questions about this
process,
you may contact Debbie Nowak at Enron, 713-853-3304, or Christi Smith at
Keilty, Goldsmith & Company, 858-450-2554.

Thank you for your participation.


Judy,  Attached is the GTC to be used for the Mariner deal with the revisions we discussed.  I will be out Thurs. and Fri. but will check voicemail.


that won't be a problem at all
ily
fletch


I tried to breakout the curves for Keith and Frank in the file you are working on but we should run that by them for approval.  Mike will be setting all gas daily and physical curves.  I think we can combine basis, index and GDI curves into one file per trader leaving only three curve files to load.

Let me know what you think.  Once we get their ok on the curves, we can set them up and let them add any formulas they need, especially Mikes file.

KK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:21 AM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	RE: new books

Two people will be setting curves for basis.  Keith Holst for CA curves and Frank Ermis for Rockies and Southwest curves. I will be setting curves for balance of the month.

Thanks,
Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:03 AM
To:	Grigsby, Mike
Subject:	new books

Mike,

We will be setting up both physical and financial books for everyone.  I know not everyone will have physical but to keep it consistent everyone will have both just in case.  I have the 10 names you sent Jeff earlier, please let me know if that changes.  Do you know what the structure going to look like? ie.  will each trader be assigned specific curves/locations, cash vs. term, how many different people will be setting curves.

We will be starting over with our curve files also.  We want to only start with the true published curves.  We have many derived/internal curves that aren't necessary and if we need to create more curves we will look into it later.  Since the number of curves will be greatly reduced, we will probably start with one file.

Thanks
Kam

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:40 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	Zach McCarroll

Can you get together with Zach on Thursday or Friday and walk him through a simple book.  Take Jane Tholt's book and discuss Risk 101.

Send him an email with a time and place.

Thanks,
Mike


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 06/20/2000 12:44
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dave Nommensen                           06/16/2000 05:25 PM

To: Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott Williamson/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Pyle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim Ogg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jaikishore Bharathi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Regan M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul F
Poellinger/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Unify stress test next week with Sybase 12.0

We have done some preliminary testing of the latest version of Sybase
(version 12).  We have seen very positive results from our initial tests and
would like to proceed with a "stress test" (not to be confused with me
showing up each day at work).  We would like to do 2 tests next week due to
hardware and business restrictions.

The test would be similar to those from late-1998 (ah, those were the
days!).  We will ask all users, as well as I.T. folks, to run as many of
their usual processing during a scripted time frame from approx noon - 1:30pm
on Tuesday and Wednesday. Be sure to order some yummy pizza or sandwiches for
your staff!

The Sybase 12.0 environment can be accessed via Start/Programs/Test
Applications/Unify Applications/Unify Gas-Power Stage.  On the Login window,
select server = "ASE 12 Test".  If you usual Production password does not
work, try "houston".  If that does not work, try a neighbor's (Audit says
that fine, its just a test).  Each user should plan to run several sessions
where permissible to simulate a heavy load on the system and to make up for
those not able to participate during this time.  Please have your staff try
to login some time Monday to insure they have access.

The test script during the time period will be:
12:00 - 1:30 Logistics:  pathing, nominating, running some reports
12:20 - 1:30 Volume Management: do your thing
12:40 - 1:30 Settlements/Accounting:  pile in

Please let me know if your area would NOT be able to assist in this very
important test.  The results of these 2 tests will dictate whether we should
pursue our migration to this new release in mid-July.  The less bid weeks
with poor system performance the better!

Thanks in advance for your help, d.n.


- G
Below is Citation's Contact/Bank Information for the contracts.

Tyrell Harrison
303 575 6478
----- Forwarded by Tyrell Harrison/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001 12:15 PM -----

	"Alan Koelemay" <akoelemay@cogc.com>
	04/20/2001 09:04 AM

		 To: tyrell.harrison@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enfolil contract information

Thanks for your call this morning.  If you want to email back the
response to my questions relative to confirmations and invoicing, that's
OK with me.  I recommend the invoicing issue (Enron paying Citation
based on receiving that information directly from Bear Paw or other
metering entity) be handled in the Transactions as that supercedes the
Enfolil Agreement.  Any questions, please advise.

Company contacts and address to be included in Appendix 1 are as
follows:
    Citation's address:   8223 Willow Place South, Houston, TX
77070-5623
    Notices/Correspondence:  Same address - Attn: Marketing Department
    Invoices:  Same address - Attn: Gas Revenue Accounting
    Payments:  Bank Name:        LaSalle Bank N.A.
                     Bank Location:    Chicago, IL
                     ABA Number:     071000505
                     Account Name:    Citation Oil & Gas Corp.
                     Account Number: 5800241530

    Nominations:  Alan Koelemay @ 281-517-7366
    Confirmations: Alan Koelemay @ 281-517-7366
                           Fax Number:  281-469-9641 (Marketing Dept.)


unsubscribe pjm-customer-info


i asked ina rangel to send it to you.


Thanks. Your kind thoughts are appreciated.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000 02:28 PM -----

	BDailey@milbank.com
	08/17/2000 01:54 PM

		 To: amanda.angelini@ssmb.com, rick.caplan@ssmb.com, steve.incontro@ssmb.com,
doug.mcdowell@enron.com, craig.clark@enron.com, ryan.siurek@enron.com,
gareth.bahlmann@enron.com, clint.walden@enron.com, kevin.d.jordan@enron.com,
mark.taylor@enron.com, carol.stclair@enron.com, brent.vasconcellos@enron.com,
annmarie.tiller@enron.com, Kimberly.r.Scardino@us.arthurandersen.com,
Fcochran@velaw.com, acurry@velaw.com, jnr@maples.candw.ky
		 cc: EMoser@milbank.com, FPuleo@milbank.com, MMottesi@milbank.com,
MDunn1@milbank.com
		 Subject: Yosemite/Delta III

Please find attached below the initial draft Delta III Enron/Delta and
Enron/Citi Fiscal Agency Agreements, as marked against the respective Delta I
documents that were use as precedent.

Please note that these initial drafts are subject to our continuing review.

Please do not hesitate to contact either of the undersigned with any
questions or comments.

Eric Moser
(212) 530-5388

Bruce Dailey
(212) 530-5565

 <<E-D FAA.doc>>  <<E-C FAA.doc>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - E-D FAA.doc
 - E-C FAA.doc


> Gas Cost Stabilization Seminar
>
> The American Gas Association is sponsoring a seminar on gas cost
> stabilization techniques, on September 20-21, 2001 at AGA, 400 N. Capitol
> St., Washington, DC.  An agenda and registration materials will be sent
> shortly.  For now, please mark your calendars and plan to attend this
> important event.
>
> Please see attached . . .
>
>
>
> Catherine
> Catherine F. Kazzi
> Senior Staff Associate
> Regulatory Affairs
> American Gas Association
> 202-824-7233
> ckazzi@aga.org <mailto:ckazzi@aga.org>
>
>  <<Save the Date 5.pdf>>

 - Save the Date 5.pdf


Thanks Vince.

I have contacted him and have given him your phone number.

He will attempt to contact you Thursady or Friday.

Good luck.

Vince J Kaminski
10/24/2000 03:59 PM
To: Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: RE: opportunities

Lloyd,

Yes, I would be very interested.

Vince

Lloyd Will
10/24/2000 02:45 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: opportunities

Vince would you be interested in this professional.

I would be glad to facilitate a conference call.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 02:43 PM
---------------------------

"Sheble, G.B." <gsheble@iastate.edu> on 10/17/2000 04:52:57 PM
To: "'Lloyd.Will@enron.com'" <Lloyd.Will@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: opportunities

Loyd

I tried to call yesterday, but you were out of the office.  My schedule
follows, would you want to pick a time for me to call you or send me a list
of times to pick?

Gerry

Fall 2000 Teaching Schedule
EE 553 MTWR 10 -11 AM Curtis Hall 308
ENGR 161 MW 2-4 Howe Hall 2228
Other Commitments
M 11-12 EP&ES
M 1-2 Office Hours
T 12-2 EP&ES Seminar
T 2-3 Office Hours
T 3-4 PSERC
T 5-6  EPRI-DOD
W 11-12 Office Hours
W 4-9 DSM
R 11-12 Office Hours
F 11-12 P&T
F 1-3 CAS
F 3-4 Departmental Meeting

-----Original Message-----
From: Lloyd.Will@enron.com [mailto:Lloyd.Will@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 8:00 AM
To: Sheble, G.B.
Subject: RE: opportunities

Give me a call any time to discuss things.

713-853-3383.

Thanks.

"Sheble, G.B." <gsheble@iastate.edu> on 10/15/2000 02:17:02 PM

To:   Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  RE: opportunities

Lloyd

I am attaching another resume for your review, please pass it along if
there
is any interest.

I would also like to discuss opportunities with you as I expect to graduate
with my MBA Summer 2001.

Cordially,

Gerry

===================================
Gerald B. Shebl,
Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering
Director of Complex Adaptive Systems Program
1115 Coover Hall
Ames, Iowa 50011
voice: 515.294.3046
FAX: 515.294.4263
email: gsheble@iastate.edu
web: http://www.ee.iastate.edu/~sheble/
===================================


Bryan:  I'll call you first thing in the morning.  Is Edmund there as well?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Seyfried, Bryan
Sent:	Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara; Cooper, Edmund
Subject:	Enron Credit

fax from genre....

sara -- to bring you up to speed, BNP Paribas decided they could not go forward with the transaction.  We were able to get GenRe back into the trade late Friday night and are attempting to complete the novation/assignement over the next couple of days.  In order to reduce concerns over potential clawbacks, I think it is best to take this transaction through the Houston process.

Can you let me know exactly what needs to be done and I will start working on our side.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	FACSys Fax Connector (EULON-MSCNX03P)
Sent:	27 December 2001 16:14
To:	Seyfried, Bryan
Subject:	Received fax from +4420 7753 0719

Sender: 		+4420 7753 0719
Received: 	27 December 2001 16:06
Pages: 		2
Serviced By:  	FACSys server EULON-APFX1P (Device 1)
Routing Info: 	38656

-------------- Fax Image -------------
 << File: 675688.tif >>


REMINDER:  They will arrive at 1:00 p.m. today.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sharon Solon/ET&S/Enron on 10/30/2000
09:16 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Sharon Solon                           10/24/2000 12:17 PM

To: Omaha Office - All Employees
cc:

Subject: FERC Auditors

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Auditors will be in the Omaha office
starting Monday, October 30th through Thursday, November 2nd.  The Auditors
will be located in Room 149.  Please be careful of topics discussed and your
conversations while in the kitchen area, vending machine area or on your way
to the fitness rooms.  Casual conversation is the word.

Thanks to everyone.


I added an additional name overlay to the final report for February:  from
CXY Energy Inc.  to Nexen Petroleum U.S.A. Inc.  The shortname on this record
will be changed on Friday, Feb 23, 2001.  Records will be inactivated on
03/01, unless otherwise indicated.


Greetings from Amazon.com!

You have successfully changed your password.

Please note that you can view the status of your account, examine
your orders, cancel unshipped orders, change your e-mail address or
password, or update your subscriptions to our Personal Notification
Services at any time through the "Your Account" link on the
navigation bar.

http://www.amazon.com/your-account

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Amazon.com
Earth's Biggest Selection
orders@amazon.com      http://www.amazon.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------


I think there is also some stuff under a subsidiary of NICOR, Northern Illinois.  Make sure both are included.  If you guys can get the balances and which deal numbers are outstanding I think we can match up with the CPR reports that I have.
PL

-----Original Message-----
From: James, Marlo C.
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Love, Phillip M.
Subject: RE: NICOR

I can run the A/P for my side.  I don't know how much on the settlements side is all part of this issue since there are some true purchases and sales, I just don't want to give you figures that are not correct even though I know the majority of the balances belong to the cleanup.

-----Original Message-----
From: Love, Phillip M.
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:04 PM
To: James, Marlo C.; Jacobs, Charles
Subject: RE: NICOR

I was under the impression that there was an outstanding A/R and A/P balance on this counterparty in the 4-5 million dollar range.  Should be pretty noticeable.
PL

-----Original Message-----
From: James, Marlo C.
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:00 PM
To: Jacobs, Charles
Cc: Love, Phillip M.
Subject: RE: NICOR

You might want to call her and see if she can tell you anything.  I was assuming this was the totals still sitting on the ledger, but maybe not all of it.  Let me know if you can't reach her.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacobs, Charles
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:29 PM
To: James, Marlo C.
Cc: Love, Phillip M.
Subject: RE: NICOR

In a word - NO!!  Can you clue me in on what you need?  I have Lisa's email address and phone number if you don't think we can find it...

-----Original Message-----
From: James, Marlo C.
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Jacobs, Charles
Cc: Love, Phillip M.
Subject: FW: NICOR

Chuck, Do you know the figures to give to Phillip?  I wasn't sure if Lisa filled you in on any of this before she left.
-----Original Message-----
From: Love, Phillip M.
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:39 PM
To: James, Marlo C.
Subject: RE: NICOR

The desk took the adjustment and we were waiting on Lisa to verify the amounts on the A/R.  We need to know the variance on the A/R by month to compare to my analysis and we can then change the prices in Sitara.  The desk took a 5.7 million dollar expense PMA.  Please let me know if and when you guys have the info and we can get it fixed in Sitara.  Until this gets done, OA will have a variance on flash to actual because the desk already took the adjustment - we wanted to get it in for year end.
PL

-----Original Message-----
From: James, Marlo C.
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:02 PM
To: Love, Phillip M.
Subject: RE: NICOR

How is this going?  Jennifer Lee is OA is questioning the impact and is trying to understand everything so I sent her copies of our communications.  Any further communications need to copy her on since Lisa V. is no longer here.

Thanks,
Marlo

-----Original Message-----
From: Love, Phillip M.
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:09 PM
To: James, Marlo C.
Subject: RE: NICOR

still working.  I hope to have it completed before the week is out.  As I am sure you are experiencing as well all the fire drills that are currently going on around here, I have been running since I got back from vacation.  Believe me when I say this is a high priority for me as well because of all the potential P&L fallout for the traders who have been entering this information.
PL

-----Original Message-----
From: James, Marlo C.
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:56 AM
To: Love, Phillip M.
Cc: Saucier, Darla
Subject: RE: NICOR

How are things going with this.  We need to give updates to our leads.

-----Original Message-----
From: Saucier, Darla
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 12:58 PM
To: James, Marlo C.
Subject: FW: NICOR

-----Original Message-----
From: Love, Phillip M.
Sent: Mon 11/12/2001 11:05 AM
To: Saucier, Darla
Cc:
Subject: RE: NICOR

can you get me copies of the August Invoice.  Cora is very confident we have done everything correctly and I am still disagreeing with her(agreeing with you guys).  This is pretty confusing and they did not keep spreadsheets or data about these, so I am having trouble tying all the volumes.  Could you also get me copies of the pipeline statements for August.  It looks like I am also missing one of the pipeline statements from July as well.  I do not have the statement for the loan of 73,416.  Thanks.  I am sorry this is taking a while, this deal is very complex and traders/schedulers have not kept good records.

PL

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Saucier, Darla
Sent:   Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:03 PM
To:     Love, Phillip M.
Cc:     James, Marlo C.
Subject:        RE: NICOR

Here's what we have done for all the month's involved.  I'll have to copy the Nicor invoices and get them to you.  I will bring those down to you tomorrow morning.

 << File: NICOR-rec.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Love, Phillip M.
Sent:   Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:41 PM
To:     James, Marlo C.; Saucier, Darla
Subject:        RE: NICOR

can you get me the info on August for Nicor, according to Cora Pendergrass I need to see august numbers because some of July's invoice has august volumes.  I would like a copy of all the stuff you guys gave me for July.  Thanks.

PL

 -----Original Message-----
From:   James, Marlo C.
Sent:   Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:36 PM
To:     Palmer, B. Scott
Cc:     Love, Phillip M.; Saucier, Darla; Valderrama, Lisa; Anastas, Sherry
Subject:        RE: NICOR

Right now the parking and loaned deals that we did or do with NIPSCO are not being booked correctly in Unify.  The volumes are coming over onto Supply Verifications or Sales Invoices depending what we are doing.  These deals should be coming over to the service side so that I can be paying for these deals.  However, I do not have anything on the service side.  Therefore, I have a had to pay (paper) manuals to pay NIPSCO and Darla has outstanding A/R & A/P items since we do not invoice or pay NIPSCO for these deals.  I have requested that Marlene forward the service contracts that are currently in the system to verify what we have setup so that you can make sure the deals are setup and we can get these corrected in Unify.  I need to get my payables issues cleared up as well for the manuals I had to do to get them paid as interest was also charged.  If you need to meet up with Darla and I to show you what we have, please let us know.  The sooner we can get these resolved the better.

Thanks,
Marlo

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Palmer, B. Scott
Sent:   Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:20 PM
To:     Saucier, Darla
Cc:     James, Marlo C.; Love, Phillip M.
Subject:        RE: NICOR

Phillip is working on NICOR. I will work on NIPSCO. Marlo's e-mail was the first I have heard of this and it does not really describe what the issue is. Can somebody clue me in with the details? Thanks.

Scott

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Saucier, Darla
Sent:   Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:56 PM
To:     Palmer, B. Scott
Subject:        FW: NICOR

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Saucier, Darla
Sent:   Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:51 PM
To:     Love, Phillip M.
Cc:     McFatridge, Thomas; Valderrama, Lisa; PALMER, Scott L
Subject:        NICOR

Hi Phillip,

I saw your emails to Marlo James on the Nicor issue that said Scott Palmer would be taking over the Central desk.  I just wanted to see if it would be possible to put this on the highest priority.  Due to the current situation, we need to get this matter resolved ASAP to be able to clear off the balances left sitting on our A/R and A/P.  Let me know if there's any additional information that you would require from me. Again, I stress the urgency of resolving this.  Thanks for your help.  Please update me on any progress as soon as possible.

Thanks
Darla Saucier


Sara,
Is there a Guarantee in place by Enron Corp. for ECT Investments, Inc.
relating to our prime broker agreements with Goldman Sachs?
We are talking to Goldman currently about increasing our leverage and a
guarantee may be beneficial if one does not already exist.  We are unsure if
one already exists.
Thanks,
Sheila


For your information.

 <<3-1 City of SD Mot. to Intervene.pdf>>

**************

CONFIDENTIAL

Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP
600 West Broadway
Suite 2600
San Diego, CA 92101-3391
(619) 236-1414

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is
confidential and intended to be sent only to the stated recipient of the
transmission.  It may therefore be protected from unauthorized use or
dissemination by the attorney-client and/or attorney work-product
privileges.  If you are not the intended recipient or the intended
recipient's agent, you are hereby notified that any review, use,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  You are also asked to notify us immediately by telephone and to
delete this transmission with any attachments and destroy all copies in any
form.  Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

 - 3-1 City of SD Mot. to Intervene.pdf


I'll get with my UBS contacts and find her a permanent place.  I'm working on McDonald as well.

Tammy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:04 PM
To:	Milnthorp, Rob
Cc:	Calger, Christopher F.; Abramo, Caroline; Forster, David; Shepperd, Tammy R.
Subject:	RE: New York

Agreed - sorry I had thought Lavo sorted this out.  As we understand, Caroline wants to work in Manhattan and therefore we need to look at those offices.

Tammy Shepperd is the person to contact.

Tammy can you please sort out Caroline - same issues as Mike McDonald but New York.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Milnthorp, Rob
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:58 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Calger, Christopher F.; Abramo, Caroline; Forster, David
Subject:	New York

Louise, I talked in detail with Caroline this am. We need to identify where Caroline is going to reside. I understand that UBS has two operations in NY - I think you and Hutchins need to decide what makes the most sense (ie synergies). It is critical that we get this resolved so that Caroline has some infrastructure around her.


Given the increased activity relating to reform of the Commodity Exchange
Act the past two weeks, I have attached a memorandum outlining the status of
various initiatives for your review.  Please feel free to contact me if you
have any questions or if you are in need of additional information(i.e.
copy/outline of Ewing legislation).

Stacy Carey
Director of U.S. Regulatory Policy

 - CEA Update Memorandum.doc


Dude,

Next Wednesday, May 30. Let's see, the 12: the four of us, Nancy, Eldon,
then Molly, Sean, Chris, Kristina, Kent, Allison, and maybe scanky HO, and
her friend Stacey, or Riddles and his "girlfriend."

Listen, I just got back from ZYZZYVA and they want me to edit 3/4 of the new
issue--by Saturday, Tuesday AM at latest. I told them I'd get it to them by
Friday afternoon, so you know what that means. It's just that there are only
two people there, and you need fresh eyes to catch the small, but very
important, errors. I think they have someone else like me who does stuff,
but can't come through right now. Also, the deadline for application to the
Napa Valley Writer's Workshop is Friday, Nancy just told me. Then, my
Guardian article's due next week. I've never been this busy since I moved
here!! Pretty funny. But I'm sorry I can't make it. I do, however, pledge my
time to blue collar labor any and all days. Like, save the wood piles or
anything else 'til Saturday AM. Anyway, I guess because of that and
Prentice's strep, you can leave early.

Cheers, dude, and I'm bummed I'm not going early myself, playing golf, maybe
diving, and just chilling up there.

See you Friday!

LATE!

>From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
>To: "Scott Laughlin" <scottwl@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: Cameron's b-day
>Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 14:46:17 -0500
>
>
>woodward is great!  damned good choice.  who's the 12?  and what day?
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


We have received the executed Letter Agreement dated February 15, 2000
amending the EnronOnline Electronic Trading Agreement.  Copies will be
distributed in the usual manner.


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/24/2001
02:10 PM ---------------------------
From: Lisa Yoho on 05/24/2001 12:40 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: You're On!

Steve:

The NARUC panel will be held on July 16th from 8 - 10 am.   They have invited
DOE Secretary Abraham, and Senators Murkowski and Bingaman to participate.

Lisa


Thanks.

ckm


Here are the changes we discussed on Friday.

I am sending Liz Ivers and Karen Denne for their review.

Jim

From: Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/11/2001 05:21 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: FW: Letter To Commissioners re Information request made at Oral
Argum ent

Please email or call me with your comments.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-JBennett+20+3CJBennett+40GMSSR+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 4:36 PM
To: Sanders, Richard; Williams, Robert C.
Cc: MDay
Subject: Letter To Commissioners re Information request made at Oral Argum ent
Importance: High

Richard and Bob --

Attached is  a draft letter to be sent to the Commissioners on Monday
morning. Please review for accuracy of responses and whether you are
comfortable with the tone taken.

 <<X24460.DOC>>

Jeanne Bennett

 - X24460.DOC


New US Gas Products Available on Dynegydirect

      Please open the attached document to view a list of products that
have been added to the Dynegydirect catalog within the last business day.
For a comprehensive list of products added within the last thirty (30)
calendar days, please click the "NEW PRODUCTS" link on the  Dynegydirect
homepage.

(See attached file: Dynegydirect New Products - US Natural Gas.pdf)

 For questions regarding new products please contact e-Care at:

Dynegydirect e-Care
Dynegy Inc.
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800
Houston, Texas 77002

E-mail:
e-care@dynegydirect.com

Phone:
North America 877.396.3493
United Kingdom 0800.169.6591
International  +1.713.767.5000

Fax:
North America 877.396.3492
United Kingdom 0800.169.6615
International  +1.713.388.6002


We need to send the letter to these two people rather than Matt Quayle:

Bruno Cohen- Head of CNBC business news
Bruno.Cohen@nbc.com

David Friend - Executive Producer of Squawk Box
David.Friend@nbc.com


Could you please take a look at this and coordinate with Joanie to fix?

Thanks,

Eric
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2000 05:48 PM
---------------------------

Joanie H Ngo
02/23/2000 03:33 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Southern Union Galveston/Pt. Arthur

Eric,

Could you find some time to look at the new Southern Union contract for
Galveston and Port Arthur?  Pricings are wrong in Sitara so my system
invoices are being understated/overstated each month.

If you want, we could sit down and go over it to see what needs to be done.

Let me know.

Thanks.

Joanie
x36574


Once again....
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/31/2000 08:59
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
10/30/2000 06:44 PM
To: rlevine@fce.com, hnock@fce.com
cc: Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen
Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Oct 30 version of FCE/Enron contract

Gentlemen,

Here's the most recent version of the equipment contract.  I am including a
ComparRite redline version, comparing this version to the Oct 11 version sent
by Enron.

I look forward to speaking with you soon,

Kay


Hi Jeff,

Of course I agree with this. That it's not a time for politics, whether partisan or otherwise. But eventually we have to address issues beyond grieving, helping, and bringing the lunatics to justice. Why is this happening? I do not agree with what Clinton said this morning in Australia, which was " because we are a great nation, that makes us a target."

Rory

I've left it up to Timmi to tell me where I'm going tonight. Cameron said she wanted to be at Napa. I'll go anywhere the four of you are gathered. I look forward to being with you all again.

Rory

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Dasovich, Jeff

  And I think partisan politics is about the very last thing that the families of the victims are thinking about at this time.

  Best,
  Jeff

  We'll see you tonite for the bluegrass filming?
    -----Original Message-----


- 1166833v2.doc


Carol, enclosed please find proposed revisions to ISDA Schedule Part 6 -- the
revisions would incorporate the 2000 Supplement to the 1993 Commodity
Derivatives Definitions.  I have also enclosed a brief memo from me to Sara
discussing the revisions.

The revisions do not seek to substantively change Part 6 (e.g., we are not
seeking to change the "Disruption Fallbacks" or their priorities).  The
revisions simply acknowledge the 2000 Supplement and make the terminology
consistent.

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


We have finalized the arrangements for Steve's Half Day Strategy meeting.
Please mark your calendars:

  Monday, February 12, 2001, 1:00p - 4:00p, EB-48C2

Yes, we will have some snacks and sodas for all:)

Thanks in advance,

adr


Chris, the simple fact, which we know from past experience and which OPG is
missing, is that there is a large segment of counterparties who for various
reasons (logistics/scheduling fixed-priced physical requirements for term
with a with a marketer; corporate authorizations for physical transacting
only; industrial culture; commercial sophistication; etc) will only want to
transact physically.  To ignore this is to ignore a large segment of the
market.

If OPG wants out of the process I nonetheless urge you to continue as I am
confident that once the market opens, or gets closer to opening, they will
realize this.  If they want to compete fully in the trading business they
will come back to what the industry is using for physical settlement, which
is the EEI form you will have developed.

I also think that OPG is missing the point on physical settlement.  As we
discussed the IMO is merely the pool settlement mechanism.  That does not
mean that the underlying transaction cannot be a physical bilateral which
allocates physical settlement risk as between the parties for physical
delivery obligations (such as for failure to deliver; increased costs and
prudential support for failure to deliver even where the IMO mechanism makes
up the deficiency volume; force majeure; volume management; etc).

I think it can be said in all markets that in many cases the distinctions
between physical and financial trading can be distinctions without a
difference, but nonetheless there are some real distinctions and more
importantly, even if there are no differences, certain counterparties will
only want to deal in what they believe to be a physically settled product.

So it seems you are close with the other counterparties, and I suggest you
just march on with them if OPG does not want to participate further.

Peter.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 09/20/2000
12:43 PM ---------------------------

Kimberly Rizzi@ECT
09/19/2000 04:39 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christie
Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
John Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Helen
Rizzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron,
Carmen Perez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joan
Stransky/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Melinda McCarty/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carol
Barcus/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: People Solutions

To: Public Affairs & Administration Leadership

From:  Corporate HR Support Team

Have you wondered lately who to call in HR for solutions?

Your Corporate HR Team is now in place and ready to help you make your people
work for you!  Attached is a quick 2 page overview of the corporate team
describing who is responsible for what by client group.

Feel free to forward it to the rest of your team so that you will all know
who your lead generalist is and where to call for specifics like job
postings, benefits questions, and transfers or terminations.  Below is a list
of Frequently Asked Questions to help you along.  It's also attached in Word
so you can print it if need be.

Also stay tuned, we will be scheduling meetings with the Administrative
Assistants in your group to fill them in on where to go for quick, easy
answers!

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
******************************

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the different functions within HR and who do we contact?
 Generalists
  These folks are your first line of customer care.  Your generalist will
become part of your business, consult with you to make your     organization
even more effective and generally bring you HR solutions from big to small.
They will harness other resources to meet your    needs and keep at it until
it's solved!
Kim Rizzi  HR, Office of the Chair, Environmental Health & Safety,
Executives  (secondary for all)
Charles Gauthier Corporate Accounting & Transaction Accounting, Government
Affairs
Trang Dinh  Global Strategic Sourcing, Community Relations, Public Affairs,
Investor Relations, Corporate     Development  (secondary for Corporate &
Transaction Accounting and Government Affairs)
Michelle Hargrave Tax, Credit Union, EPSC/Building Services, Aviation
(secondary for Gov't Affairs, HR and Office of the    Chair)
Todd Migliore  Integrated Solution Center (SAP Team)

 Recruiter
  Rather than use expensive search firms take advantage of your business
recruiter Tony Vasut.  Tony will post your open positions and    help you
find the ideal employee to make your organization even more effective.

 Compensation Analyst
  Charles Gauthier, in addition to being a lead generalist, will also help
you analyze and ensure that employee compensation (for those who    are below
the VP level) is market based and equitable.  He also will lead projects that
the generalists conduct for the clients in addition to leading   the
generalist team through the year end bonus and merit process.

 Generalist Admin Support
  These are the people who will coordinate information requests and support
the generalists in solving your day to day people issues.
Jennifer Jordan  HR, Office of the Chair, Environmental Health & Safety,
Executives, Accounting, Global Strategic Sourcing, Community Relations,
Public Affairs, Investor Relations, Corporate Development, Credit Union,
EPSC/Building Services, Aviation.  Jennifer also coordinates the corporate
personnel file room and maintains service awards.
Sonja Galloway Tax and Government Affairs

 Transaction Processing Center
These are the people somewhat behind the scenes.  They enter all data into
SAP and perform all transactions related to people.  They are busy all day,
every day!
Sonja Galloway  Enters transactions and informs the generalists what
information is required as the system changes.
Renee Kelso  Also enters transactions and does all employment verifications
for corporate.

In Addition to these individuals we rely on the experts in certain areas.
You can too if needed:

Payroll Questions: x55555

 Benefits Questions: x37979

 eHRonline Help: x54727

What do I do if eHRonline has incorrect information that I don't have access
to correct?
 Please send an e-mail to the Lead Generalist or the generalist admin.
support for your group describing all of the information that is incorrect
and what the  correct information should be.  The generalist will then be the
point person to correct your problem and may refer it to a specialist or
transaction support  person for further assistance.  You will see the
correction on eHRonline within a few days.

What should I do if I need to hire a new employee?
 You can contact Tony Vasut, the corporate recruiter.  He will spend time
understanding your needs and getting a feel for the type of person who will
be  perfect for your position.  Then he will go out and get you the person
you need!  He will also work with you to collect information needed to create
the  position on the data system ....  so please have a description of what
you need ready!

What should I do if one of my employee's resigns?
 Please contact your lead generalist or the generalist admin. support for
your group.  The generalist will need a copy of the resignation letter from
the  employee.  We will then schedule an exit interview for about 20 minutes
on the employee's last day so that we can explain the benefits, stock option
and  final payment situations to the employee.  Also, we'll collect the badge
and amex cards that belong to corporate.  You will need to collect up any
company  equipment that you have purchased for that employee.

What if someone is on my cost center that shouldn't be?
 Please send an e-mail to the generalist admin. support stating the correct
new cost center and supervisor if you know it.  If not, then just tell us as
much as  you know.  Thanks!

What if I don't think my team is really as productive as they could be?
 You may be in need of some brainstorming with your HR generalist.  They can
partner with you to find a solution that fits your group and makes your
organization work for you!

What do I do if my mailstop is wrong?
 Please send an e-mail to the lead generalist or generalist admin. support
specifying the new, correct mailstop.  They will submit an e-mail form to
Sunny  Rodgers who will correct it.  They will copy you so that you're in on
the loop.

What if I think my vacation balance is incorrect on eHRonline?
 Please send an e-mail to the Lead Generalist for your group specifying the
listed vacation balance and then the vacation balance you feel is correct.
The  generalist will research the issue and get back to you.
 You may also contact the time administrator for corporate through the
payroll helpline at x55555 and they can research it and assist you in
resolving the  variance.

What if I have a question that isn't on this list?
 Please call you lead generalist right away and they'll help you navigate the
waters to a SOLUTION!


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 08/15/2000 02:22 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin M Presto                           08/15/2000 02:12 PM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Spread option on Tiverton for Bal '00

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT on 08/15/2000
02:02 PM ---------------------------

John Llodra@ENRON
08/15/2000 09:46 AM
To: Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Suarez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Spread option on Tiverton for Bal '00

Calpine-EMI wants to get a bid from us on a spread option on their Tiverton
plant in Tiverton, Rhode Island for Sept 1, 00 through Dec 31, 00.  (Tiverton
apparently has achieved full commercial status as of today)  I will be
pulling together a price today/tomorrow and was hoping to get back to them no
later than end of this week.  They are shopping this around to 4-5 entities
including us.  Here are some details FYI:

Day-ahead on-peak call on either power or gas
Power qty = 250 MW
Power strike = $45/Mwh
Gas qty = 30,666 mmBtu per day (16 on-peak hours), which results in an
implied heat rate of about 7667 mmbtu/GWh
Gas strike is $5.90/mmBtu
Gas is delivered to plant; they will assign their Algonquin gas capacity
rights which will allow secondary rights anywhere on the Algonquin G lateral
Power firmness:  unit contingent with availability guarantee of not less than
95%
Gas firmness:  secondary firm

Please get back to me ASAP with any comments or questions, including any
feedback on the degree of "strategic fit" this position would provide us.
Ed, I could especially use some gas expertise in scrubbing down the gas piece
and to make sure our gas curves are in the market (some miscellaneous
customer feedback I've gotten suggests our Northeast gas numbers are a bit
off).  Thanks all

John


maybe we  should try it for lunch when we are hung over.


The eThink Team

Do you know what's included in Enron's Code of Ethics?  Do you know what policies affect corporate conduct?  Ask Sharon Butcher, Assistant General Counsel of Corporate Legal, all your questions about our corporate policies today (June 5) on eSpeak at 10 a.m. Houston time.
Can't make the live event?  No worries.  Go to eSpeak (http://ethink.enron.com/eSpeak/exec/default.asp) now and submit your question.  Sharon will try to answer it during her event and you can read the transcript later.

Stop what you're doing!  Go to the Thinkbank (http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/Thinkbank.nsf/HomePage?OpenPage) now!  Notice anything different?


FYI!  Please see the emails below.  I just wanted to let you know that this "political" battle within EES/EWS is brewing.  I have been providing support whenever I have been asked, e.g. answering questions, research, etc.  I will be in my office tomorrow if you would like to discuss or have any questions.  Otherwise you can page me today (I have meetings and flights, but I will call if I can.)  Thanks.

Nancy A. Hetrick
Enron Corp.
Director, Government Affairs
Phone:  712-366-3399
Pager:   888-912-1426

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ader, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 12:21 PM
To:	Wagner, Joseph
Cc:	Delainey, David; Dietrich, Janet; Blachman, Jeremy; Holmes, Sean; Bernstein, Mark; Hetrick, Nancy; Herndon, Rogers; Ochsner, Preston
Subject:	Re: ERCOT LSE's

Joe,

I requested a meeting with you yesterday to work with you and convey what we have learned over the last three months by working with regulatory and the ERCOT ISO to utilize and create additional LSE accounts.  As you were informed by Nancy Hetrick of regulatory all three currently available LSE account are committed by Structured Supply for use under currently negotiated masters.  We requested the meeting with you yesterday to explain what we were doing and why we needed the other three EES LSE accounts.  We also took the time to explain the process for establishing new LSE accounts, under a LLC structure which is not complicated, but the structure that the new LSE accounts would be created under (SPV) is inconsistent with the masters negotiated and EES would not be able to perform under these masters.

We have tried to work with you in cooperation to accomplish your goals consistent with the constraints of the ERCOT rules.  We have explained our needs and the reason for them. We conveyed our interest in working together to accomplish the greater good for the company and offered our help in any way we could.  You mark and I agreed that it would be easier to help each other and not duplicate efforts.  We were appreciative of your willingness to proceed consistent with this spirit of cooperation.  It disheartens and surprises me that you would leave the meeting with this understanding and in agreement of the business situation and send an e-mail the next morning, without picking up the phone or stopping by to discuss this and just attempt to dictatorially commandeer the LSE accounts that you knew were committed and why they were committed.

Moreover; you told us that you thought you might need one more and you have attempted to take three more.

Best regards,

Jeff

From:	Joseph Wagner/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/16/2001 09:14 AM
To:	Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Ader/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Nancy Hetrick/ENRON@enronXgate, Rogers Herndon/ENRON@enronXgate, Preston Ochsner/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject:	ERCOT LSE's

Thank you for taking the time to discuss the LSE situation in ERCOT.  The present LSE was set up by EES and is being utilized by EWS Retail and EWS Services Group, for physical delivery in ERCOT for EES load.  In order to better manage EES volume and structure growth in ERCOT, billing issues, and optimization of the present and future portfolio, EES/EWS Retail will require the use of the sub LSE's available under EES's existing LSE arrangement.  Structured Supply will be responsible for the creation of any LLC's that need to be created to facilitate additional LSE availability.  If you have any questions or comments, please either email or call me (ext 33143).  Thanks.

-Joe


Let's ask Jeff Hines(?), our opinion research guy, to put a few short
questions together and send it out.  We may also want to include a link so
people can view the commercials again before answering.

Also,  I was talking with Beth Tilney today about our website (and the fact
that every business unit now feels free to go do their own thing).  We
thought it would be a good idea to add this topic to the brand conference
(perhaps as part of an existing segment).
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/02/2000 06:35
PM ---------------------------

Mary Clark@ENRON
08/02/2000 05:49 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron Advertising

Steve, Notes has the capability to do a quick survey of employees.  The
beauty of doing it in Notes is that it is the body of the email message, so
employees don't have to go somewhere else to participate.  The response is
much higher.  In fact, Sarah and I have used it a couple of times this year
and it was very effective.  Susan Lopez of Corp. IT Houston is the contact
(713-853-7947).  Mary

Steven J Kean@EES
08/02/2000 03:12 PM
To: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron
cc:

Subject: Enron Advertising

do we have a mechanism to survey employees?  Can we do a "scientific" poll?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/02/2000 03:10
PM ---------------------------

John Sherriff@ECT
08/02/2000 03:46 AM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron Advertising

Mark

Thanks for the call a couple of weeks ago regarding our new ad campaign.  The
challenge as I understand it is that we have difficulty in quantifying the
benefit and effectiveness of our ads.   We can measure on a periodic basis
what the CEO/CCO/CFO perception of Enron is on a periodic basis but this does
not break down the impact of our PR efforts from an ad campaign.   I
understand this dilemma.

But one thing that we could measure that is quite important to me is what our
employees think about these ads.    If all else fails these ads should make
our employees proud to work for Enron - and this is something we should be
able to measure on a consistent basis.

I know you have an upcoming event in California where your organisation will
talk about problems and challenges we have - so if you could consider this
idea I would be very appreciative.  And of course don't get to hooked on
God's country while you are in Napa.

Thanks!

John


Was Tom pissed?

Whats up?

JMF


Attached is a draft posting for the 10,000/d mainline expansion.  Please let
me know your comments by the end of the day Monday, December 4th.

Thanks!


Here's the latest, not-yet-final-but-getting-better agreement.

I may not have sent this to everyone who needs it, but I know Reagan will
take care of it.  Speaking of Reagan, he is generating exhibits.

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001
12:10 PM ---------------------------

Mike Grigsby
01/09/2001 02:26 PM
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: New Generation Report, December 1999

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 03:26
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Matt Motley                           01/05/2001 08:30 AM

To: Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Generation Report, December 1999

---------------------- Forwarded by Matt Motley/PDX/ECT on 01/05/2001 06:34
AM ---------------------------

Kristian J Lande

01/02/2001 06:15 PM

To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elliot Mainzer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT,
David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Jim Buerkle/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim
Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff G Slaughter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ed
Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Cadena/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jonalan Page/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Todd Perry/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Oh/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Generation Report, December 1999


<http://games.espn.go.com/st_fflpc/01/email/img/fflpcmail_header.gif>
	Invitations to the NFL playoff party weren't mailed out until the final game, but now 12 teams are focused on winning a championship. Who could have predicted the surprising run to the playoffs by New England, Pittsburgh and Chicago? If you're saying "I could have," then consider this your invitation to:

Fantasy Football Playoff Challenge <http://ts.go.com/bk?bs=1&bj=3031&bu=11231579&bt=8773>
It has been said that defense wins championships, and looking at the teams that had the best defensive numbers (right), the stats don't lie. So now it's up to you:

* Do you go with history and select players from a stingy cold-weather team such as Chicago, Pittsburgh or Green Bay?
* Or noting that St. Louis is on carpet the rest of the way, do you think offense with members of the "greatest show on turf"?
The choice is up to you when you play ESPN.com's
Fantasy Football Playoff Challenge <http://ts.go.com/bk?bs=1&bj=3031&bu=11231579&bt=8773>. Sign up today! <http://ts.go.com/bk?bs=1&bj=3031&bu=11231579&bt=8773> <http://ts.go.com/bk?bs=1&bj=3031&bu=11231579&bt=8773>
 <http://ts.go.com/bk?bs=1&bj=3031&bu=11231579&bt=8773>
  <http://games.espn.go.com/st_fflpc/01/email/img/1x1.gif>

2001 Defensive Points Allowed
Rank	 Team	 PPG
1	 Chicago *	 12.7
2	 Philadelphia *	 13.0
3	 Pittsburgh *	 13.2
4	 Green Bay *	 16.6
5	 New England *	 17.0
6	 St. Louis *	 17.1
7	 Baltimore *	 17.5
8	 Tampa Bay *	 17.5
9	 San Francisco *	 17.6
10	 Jacksonville	 17.9
11	 Miami *	 18.1
12	 New York *	 18.4
* Made Playoffs
This message was sent to: mswerzb@ect.enron.com

You are receiving this mail because you have registered with ESPN.com. If you don not wish to receive information regarding ESPN.com in the future, please click here <http://ts.go.com/bk?bs=1&bj=3031&bu=11231579&bt=8774> to unsubscribe

  <http://ts.go.com/bk?bs=2&bj=3031&bu=11231579>


I will attend.

	From:  Becky Young @ ENRON                           03/19/2001 11:00 AM

To:
cc:  (bcc: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Golf Invitation


At the request of Gerald Gilbert, I am forwarding for your consideration a draft of a GISB between Enron North America Corp. and TECO Power Services.  Upon your review, please give me a call with your questions and or comments.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax