Thanks, Linda.

Rosie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Linda
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:39 PM
To:	Lay, Kenneth; Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Long, Chris
Subject:	RE: Sheila and the Trade Promotion Authority

We have been working closely with the Trade Promotion outreach effort the White House established, and have regularly attended whip meetings with White House staff and others.  In that role, we are "working" a number of Texas Democrats.  I will talk again with the Congresswoman, and will call on Steve Kean to work her if needed.  No need for Ken's involvement with her at this point.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fleming, Rosalee   On Behalf Of Lay, Kenneth
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:34 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Robertson, Linda
Subject:	FW: Sheila and the Trade Promotion Authority

I asked Jim Kollaer if he had talked to our Washington office and he said they have been working on it, but this is going to take a call from Ken to Sheila.  Given the complexities of his schedule, if there is any other way, it would be good.  What do you think?

Rosie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jim Kollaer" <jkollaer@houston.org>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Lay, Kenneth
Cc:	Anne Culver
Subject:	Sheila and the Trade Promotion Authority

Ken, I am writing to ask Enron's assistance with a pro-Trade Promotion
Authority message to Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee.

The position of the Partnership and Enron are well known to Sheila.  She
consistently has voiced doubts about her ability to vote for trade
issues such as China PNTR and fast track/TPA, but in the end joins her
pro-business and trade colleagues in supporting these measures. You have
always been a very effective lobbyist on this issue.

Most recently, on October 10, 2001, Rep. Lee told Rep. Norman Dicks
(D-WA) (he was the first D to be a supporter of this new compromise leg
(HR 3005) and is whipping the issue for the Ds) that she is a no vote on
TPA (HR 3005).

Rep. Lee's reasons for not supporting this issue are as follows:

1. The process has been too partisan, Ds like Rep. Charles Rangel were
not consulted and brought to the table to develop compromise language in
the beginning.

2. Since only 25 - 30 Ds will be voting for this (and we need her to be
one of those) she will feel alone as a D.

ACTION REQUESTED:  Ken, could you or someone senior at Enron place a
call to Rep. Jackson Lee to voice strong support for TPA?

An appropriate message is that we want her to focus on good public
policy.  We are not defending the process.  This is about good
economics.  TPA benefits her consituents.

We have attached a study that highlights the benefits of trade in her
district.  This may be useful information.  It has employment numbers
and more.

The TPA vote could come next week, as early as Tuesday.  A call to her
here in Houston at 713-655-0050 would be appropriate, as the House is
recessed until Tuesday.

Thanks in advance for your positive response to this request.

 <<Texas 18 final PDF.pdf>>

Jim Kollaer
President/CEO
jkollaer@houston.org
713/844-3601

 - Texas 18 final PDF.pdf << File: Texas 18 final PDF.pdf >>


Rafael,
I send the request, dated 6/2/00, to Morgan Stanley to Contribute the shares
from EPCA to EDIDE and then Convert EDIDE's shares to ordinary WHEN the
account for EDIDE is open.  Kelly has forwarded a copy to you.

My understanding from Susan is that they are awaiting registration materials
from you.  Please let me know when Legal can expect to receive these.
Thanks. Sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2000 08:48
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Glover                           05/25/2000 11:02 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Lowry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa T Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aneela Charania/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, sheung.tam@ms.com
cc:
Subject: Enron de Inversiones de Energia S.C.A. (an Argentine company) (EDIDE)

---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000 11:00
AM ---------------------------

Rafael Rangel@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/25/2000 10:48 AM
To: Sheila Glover@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Danthea Dumayas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
florencia.groppo@hds.com.ar, Veronica
Perez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Contacts

Corrections to #4 below.  Originally had EPCA, should be EDIDE.

RFR

Rafael Rangel
05/25/2000 10:20 AM
To: Sheila Glover@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Don Overby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Danthea Dumayas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
florencia.groppo@hds.com.ar>, Veronica Perez

Subject: Re: Contacts

Sheila, as discussed yesterday, I need to do the following:

Open a brokerage account at Morgan Stanley for Enron de Inversiones de
Energia S.C.A. (an Argentine company) (EDIDE)
This account will hold ADRs that will be contributed or transferred into its
account by Enron Pipeline Company-Argentina S.A.  (EPCA)(account #038-088357)
at Morgan Stanley.
EPCA will contribute 431,300 ADRs in Transportadora Gas del Sur (TGS) into
EDIDE's new account.  That contribution represents the capital contribution
that EPCA is obligated to make under the capital increase resolution dated
February 20th, 2000.
After the ADR's are transferred into EDIDE's accounts, EDIDE will need to
convert such ADR's into ordinary Class B shares in TGS so that they can be
registered accordingly in Argentina.

Sheila, I am forwarding a hard copy of this e-mail with appropriate support
(corporate resolutions authorizing me to open this account, resolution
authorizing the increase in capital and some forms that I had Eduardo
Ojea-Quintana (President of EDIDE) sign).

Please review and advise of what else you need to finalize this transaction.

Best Regards,

RFR

---------------------- Forwarded by Rafael Rangel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
05/25/2000 09:50 AM ---------------------------

Rafael Rangel
05/24/2000 05:50 PM
To: Sheila Glover@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Danthea Dumayas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Contacts

Sheila, finally ready to open up the account at Morgan Stanley for EDIDE so
that EPCA can transfer the correct amount of ADRs.  I have the Corporate
Resolution from EDIDE.  I understand that the contact at Morgan Stanley has
changed.  Please advise.

RFR

To: Danthea Dumayas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rafael
Rangel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Contacts

I will be out on maternity leave soon (hopefully).  In my absence, please
call Sheila Glover (3-3210) for any questions that you may have.  If you just
need a copy of an old report, please call Aneela Charania at 3-0951.

Thanks,

Terri
3-9899


Please call if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Shannon


Fritz vonBrunneck, a second year law student in Germany is visiting ENA -
Legal for several weeks.  His location is EB3876C.  Please stop by and
introduce yourself to Fritz.

Thank you,

Julia Heintz Murray
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3835
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-4794
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
julia.murray@enron.com


&Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path
and leave a trail.8  -  Ralph Waldo Emerson

Watch the Enron Building lobby on Thursday, April 26th, from 11:30am to
1:00pm for information
on Enron,s unique ways to express itself through our employee communicate
tools and our workplace environment.

Featuring:
eThink, Planet Enron, Expert Finder and GIS

Special Afternoon Workshop - 3:30pm to 5:30pm
&The Painting Experience8 with Mr. Stewart Cubley
You do not have to be an artist... no training or knowledge of art is
required....  simply participate in a unique,
supportive environment where you can explore the &process8 of creativity and
risk-taking completely free from the
barriers of comparison, evaluation, judgment, success, failure or awards.
The only prerequisite is a spirit of inquiry.
There is no fee for this class.  Please RSVP to Jessica at x31918 - space is
limited.

Word of the Day
verve (v-rv) n. Energy and enthusiasm in the expression of ideas,
especially in artistic performance or composition.


I would do that.  I tried calling but got your voicemail.  Try me at 713 853
3230

"Lengkeek Jr, Steve C" <Steve.C.LengkeekJr@conectiv.com> on 02/15/2001
08:26:54 AM
To: "'john.arnold@enron.com'" <john.arnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Swaps for EFPS

I am long 800 futures short swaps any interest.

Steven Lengkeek
Conectiv
302-452-6930


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Rachael - PNR???/Sheila

Date:		11/6/2000
Time:		1:00 PM - 2:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


No not the HR Spy.  I was in the middle of emailing you when Jennifer walked
up to chit chat.  I didn't even think about it and left my email up the whole
time she was here.  But I went back and read it and I hadn't written anything
incriminating yet.

Talk to ya later.  How was Spanish?

Gabriel Monroy
12/11/2000 10:30 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: I FINISHED!

C'moon tell me. What happened? What do you mean you almost got busted? Spy?


Jean --

The PUCT voted to delay for SPP markets.  Not sure about Entergy.  Any news?  Can you send out something to the business people?

Jim


I'd love to fly dan down (at our expense) to have him meet some appropriate
people.  Let him know he should call me to figure out the best  time to get
him down here....have to go now though.......hugs    Jeff

	halley k harrisburg <hkh@michaelrosenfeldglry.com>
	02/13/2001 01:15 PM

		 To: Jeff Shankman <Jeff.Shankman@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: WARNING!!

Jeff...Watch out for an e-mail from me or Michael called something like
"check out". Do not open. It's the horrible virus they have been talking
about in the news and unfortunately my assistant opened it so it is now
automatically sent to everyone in our address books...sorry!

Also, on Sunday at our Valentine's brunch, Dan Fuller asked that I speak
with you regarding summer position. I think he has e-mailed you in the
past couple of weeks.  He wants to firm us his plans for the summer and
was hoping Enron was still a possibility. Sorry to be a pain!

Missed you on Sunday but I hope we'll see you soon.    halley


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
3/1/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 0
3/1/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
3/1/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 920,278
3/1/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 174,427
3/1/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 1,051,128


John,

I will look into this and get back with you ASAP. Vlady.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lavorato, John
Sent:	Monday, June 04, 2001 8:35 AM
To:	Gorny, Vladimir
Cc:	Whalley, Greg; Buy, Rick
Subject:	FW: Gas Curve Validation April 2001

This person hasn't found a violation in a year.  I find that hard to believe.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nguyen, Jennifer
Sent:	Friday, June 01, 2001 11:24 AM
To:	Gorny, Vladimir; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Hall, Bob M; Lavorato, John; Reeves, Leslie
Subject:	Gas Curve Validation April 2001

 << File: Curve Val Gas Memo.doc >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Donna Greif/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2000 04:49
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dave Nommensen                           05/09/2000 12:13 PM

To: Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: new Unify Transaction/Volume Count reports

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2000
12:12 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dave Nommensen                           05/09/2000 08:24 AM

To: Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane H Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari
Mao/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Benedicta Tung/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: new Unify Transaction/Volume Count reports

These 2 new reports are now available in
Start/Programs/Trading/Unify (Gas-Reporting).  This password should be the
same as your Unify (Gas) password.

Go to Path Manager/Report/General Report Selection/Path Manager.

The two new reports are Monthly Transaction Counts and Monthly Volume Counts.

Enjoy, d.n.


Natural Gas Risk Management requests and increase to 45 Million from 40
Million  to increase our gas fixed price position (long) until Tuesday
morning (August 8th).

Thanks

John


Here you go.  This is sans Calumet and Torrence sites because Peoples Energy
owns those sites.

Stephen
x 33890


Attached are the Management Summary and Hot List that will be presented in
Monday morning's staff meeting.  Please contact me if you have any
questions/comments.

Thanks,
Jeff Smith
x39859
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Smith/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000 03:41 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Patricia Anderson                           09/29/2000 03:40 PM

To: Jeff Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hot List & Mgmt Summary 9/28/00

For Distribution:

Thanks,
Patricia


I am OK on selling these packages on EOL.  This approval is based on my
understanding that all of this capacity is currently posted, or, if not
currently posted, will be posted for the appropriate amount of time prior to
sale.  Additionally, this approval is contingent on use of the webtext we
have been using for other EOL deals (I feel the need to say the obvious
because I don't believe Law will see anything on these packages again).  I
also assume that these will be short term deals--i.e., less than one year.
Any long term discounted deals raise concerns that our "standard discount
language" is designed to address, such as what is the effect of a new rate
design or reduction in the max rate on the discounted deal.  I think we can
live without that language in short term deals for now, but we need to
revisit this issue and come up with a solution before we sell any long term
deals on EOL.  ONe last thing, it is marketing's decision whether to include
in the webtext the provision that says Northern gets the $$ if the shipper
releases the capacity at a rate higher than the discounted rate.  I think our
approach in negotiated deals has been to get that agreement if we could (a
basis run up could make it a very valuable right).  If you have any
questions, call me.  DF

	From:  Craig Buehler                           02/12/2001 02:50 PM

To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Craig
Buehler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ranelle Paladino/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jo
Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Trevino/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: EOL Routing/Approval - Urgent

***  EOL ROUTING ***

Please send your approval by return email, to Craig Buehler, for the EOL
packages listed on
the attached spreadsheet.  Each of the packages (22 in total) shows the path,
sustainable capacity
and proposed rate for each product.  The rates are estimated to provide a
measure for the dollar
amount of the discount (per our current discount policy).  These 22 products
are the initial deals
being offered; subsequent packages will be routed as they are developed.
Please call Craig, at
713-853-6964, if you have questions.  After approval by Legal, Reg Affairs
and Marketing, the
approvals and/or comments will be forwarded to Danny McCarty for review.

Thanks,

Craig


Thanks for the update.  I want to make sure we present the numbers in a more
coherent fashion than just laying out the individual RCs.  You and I have
discussed this before; my recollection is that we were going to break out as
follows:

Administrative services
Aviation
building services
new building
ongoing
government affairs
Americas
Europe-Asia
Other budgets retained at business unit level
(explanation of shift in expenses from advocacy to transaction support/risk
management
PR/Communications
Brand advertising
internal comm
other PR

I may be forgetting some of the subgroups we talked about, but this is the
general idea.

	Elizabeth Linnell
	Sent by: Elizabeth Linnell
	10/18/2000 11:00 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: meeting with Mark Lindsay

I wanted to update you on my conversation this morning with Mark Lindsay
regarding next week,s budget meeting.

The format will be similar to last year,s.  We,ll be receiving from Mark,s
group a consolidated spreadsheet of all of our budgets, grouping them by
functionality and illustrating 2000 plan, 2000 estimate, and 2001 plan, and
the variances between.  We will be covering the EPSC and Aviation budgets
during the same meeting.  Billie and I will get together on Friday to compare
what the two of us have so far, and then we have a meeting set up for Monday
morning with you, Bill, Billie and me to go over everything in advance of
Tuesday,s meeting.

Points that Mark made (no surprises here):
-  Jeff has mentioned that he wants to see reductions in all corporate cost
centers since our international activities look like they,re going away.  (We
have made significant reductions year to year on our international gov,t
affairs and PR budgets, and I think we can justify that the other cost
centers are primarily focused on domestic activities while the individual
business units budget much of those activities themselves.)
-  Even though we,re allocating more overall to the business units this year,
Jeff will be interested in the gross budget numbers, before any allocations.
-  We need to be able to explain any significant budget changes year to year
 -  Mark particularly emphasized the increase in the PR budget, most of which
is retained at Corp anyway
 -  We need to be able to explain anything that we,ve inherited from the
business units that is now staying at Corp.  This  applies to the headcount
that we,ve picked up from ENA and from Int,l (Dennis, group).

Lindsay mentioned that there,s a possibility that Causey may, in advance of
our Tuesday meeting, meet by himself with Skilling to get a general idea of
where Jeff stands on the corporate budgets as they,ve been submitted so far,
and then come back to us with instructions on any changes that need to be
made.  If this is the case, we may have to make cuts before we get to present
our case.

I'm working on our presentation based on that conversation and will forward
it to you as it progresses.


I realize you have pushed these guys already, but the attached letter would
be better if not sent at all.  It doesn't address the real underlying problem
-- that a "reliability bill" on a stand alone basis doesn't fix the problem.
Instead, the letter implies that the reason for opposition is merely a
political consideration -- ie that it may reduce Congress' appetite for
action next year.  If possible, it would be better not to have the letter go
out at all.

	From:  Cynthia Sandherr                           08/22/2000 04:29 PM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com
cc:

Subject: MidAmerican Draft Documents

Per my first e-mail, here's MidAmerican's position letter on the stand alone
Reliability measure.  Seems the best we can do with the utilities who have
been supporting our position is to have them take a "no position" stance on
the stand alone bill.

 - reliabilityonly.letter.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Todd Peterson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/06/2001 01:52 PM ---------------------------

Connie Castillo
08/09/2000 04:07 PM
To: Todd Peterson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Draft Letter to Cabot for your review

Please see attached from Nancy Corbet.


Mike, looks good. My own rank had Shannon ahead of Suzanne but they are real close in my mind, although for different reasons. The numbers Hunter and I discussed had your scheduling team at four. Once we get feedback from the other desk heads we might need to rework our total for Logistics if that is even possible at this point.

Bob

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:21 AM
To:	Superty, Robert; Shively, Hunter S.
Subject:	West Logistics

Bob,

I talked with Hunter about the west logistics organizational chart.  We came up with the following list, which I believe matches your recommendation.

Randy Gay
Patti Sullivan
Shelly Mendel
Suzanne Christiansen
Shannon Groenewold

If we were to enter a scenario that reduced the analyst level on my desk, I would recommend that we discuss the placement of Susan Scott and/or Jason Wolfe in west logistics.  They have both performed at high level in logistics and offer the new company a longer term skill set than a few of the people listed in our west logistics org chart.

Please let me know what your thoughts are regarding the unfortunate scenario mentioned above.

Thanks,
Mike Grigsby


it will work out perfectly, i havent talked to her, and you have a job

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:04 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i don't know.  when are you leaving?  i will try to go, but i'm not sure how it will work out.  did you work things out with sarah?  i can't even find a job that i would want to do.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:03 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

so what time are you leaving


I had the definite impression he was going to call you.  I also know he is
working on a different deal on an impossible schedule. You know the drill.

Bart is a Washington & Lee guy.  He is older than Ned, so he didn't go to
school with him.  Just a little trivia...

Kay

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 09/27/2000 06:25:41 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Georgia sites

I haven't heard from Barton-have you?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 9:09 AM
To: Keffer, John
Subject: Re: Georgia sites

Spalding, Spradling, whatever.  I know it isn't Houston stuff (yet)...

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/25/2000 09:07
AM ---------------------------

Lisa Mellencamp@ECT
09/25/2000 09:05 AM

To:   Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:   Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:  Re: Georgia sites  (Document link: Kay Mann)

agree with kay.
i'd go with king and spradling

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com

                    Kay Mann@ENRON

                                         To:     Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT

                    09/25/2000           cc:     Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
                    08:59 AM             Subject:     Re: Georgia
sites(Document link: Lisa Mellencamp)

I've worked with Kilpatrick Stockton's North Carolina office quite a bit,
mostly regulatory- they are so so.  It is my understanding that the Atlanta
office messed up a simple thing for Lisa, and that's all I know about them.
I've worked extensively with King & Spalding, both their Houston office
(multiple matters) and Atlanta (two matters), and have had good results.
I've always worked through John Keffer in Houston, who then hooked me up
with the right folks in Atlanta.

Kay

Barton Clark@ECT
09/22/2000 12:39 PM

To:   Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:  Georgia sites

The Georgia sites have slid down hill and reached the bottom. I have to
consult with local counsel re groundwater issues. I understand the options
are King & Spaulding and Kilpatrick & Stockton. I've worked with neither.
Can you evaluate/recommend either?

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Charles Schwab

To Subscribe To Schwab's Mutual Fund Select List, Click Here

Mutual Fund Select ListT -- Smarter Than Ever!

Now, you can subscribe to Schwab's Mutual Fund Select List and receive it
directly by email!

 The Mutual Fund Select List* will arrive each quarter, listing historically
high-performing funds available through Schwab, and selected by the Schwab
Center for Investment Researchc based on objective, comparative factors. You
can use this list as a tool to select funds that will help you build a smart
and diversified portfolio.

To subscribe, log in to the new Email Alerts tab and select the Mutual Fund
Select List. Look for your first-
quarter email issue to arrive in February 2001.

Make The Most of Schwab's Mutual Fund Select List

 Receive a Web phone when you consolidate at Schwab.comBy consolidating your
assets at Schwab, you can take
greater advantage of tools such as the Mutual Fund
Select List. For a limited time, transfer $50,000 or more
in additional assets and you'll receive:

? ? A web phone
? ? 10 commission-free PocketBrokerT trades
? ? when you use your new phone to place your trades
? ? A $120 credit towards one year of web service

You can use your web phone to visit a variety of web sites
as well as log in to Schwab.com to make trades and access your account.

Get started using your web phone here!

* The information provided on the Mutual Fund select List is for general
purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation
or personalized investment advice. The securities listed may not be suitable
for you.

Terms and conditions of offer:

If you would prefer to receive only account service emails from Schwab,
please reply to this email indicating your preference. Please note: doing so
will not remove you from any SchwabAlerts or email newsletters to which you
have actively subscribed.

We respect your privacy. Schwab will use the information you provide to send
you Email Alerts, communicate with you and provide information about products
and services. Read about Schwab's privacy policy at:
http://www.schwab.com/privacy/

 Offer valid for existing Schwab customers who deposit $50,000 or more into
their Schwab or SchwabOne* account(s) before 02/28/01. Offer does not include
retirement accounts such as IRA, 401(k)s, SEP-IRA and Keogh or any other
account designed with tax advantages for retirement purposes. In addition,
Schwab Institutionalc, custodial, estate, partnership and business accounts
do not qualify. Offer is not transferable and not valid in conjunction with
any other Schwab offer.  If you work at Schwab, a wireless equipment or
service provider, another financial institution, broker-dealer, news or
financial information media company, you are also not eligible for this
offer. Limit one per customer. Domestic U.S. customers only. Exceptions may
apply. Schwab reserves the right to discontinue this offer or further
restrict this offer at any time. Offer is valid until 2/15/01, unless
terminated earlier by Schwab. Deposits must be new to Schwab, margin loans
and deposits or transfers between Schwab accounts do not qualify.

Access to PocketBroker and the Internet requires subscription to a compatible
wireless service from an independent service provider. Access is currently
limited to plans available through AT&T, Sprint and Nextel. Carrier
availability subject to change. Activation of wireless service is subject to
acceptance and credit approval of the customer's selected wireless service
provider. All activation charges and wireless service fees are the
responsibility of the customer. Customer is also responsible for any taxes or
other expenses associated  with taking advantage of this offer. For
qualifying customers, a credit of $120 toward 12 months of wireless web fees
charged by your chosen wireless service provider will be administered in your
Schwab account within 60 days of ordering your web phone. You must order a
web phone to receive this account credit. Wireless service for web phones is
not available in all areas. Schwab may limit the choices of web phones to
those phones that are available with wireless activation at an estimated
average retail value of $120. Web phone upgrades may be  available from the
suppliers of the web phones or the wireless service providers. Selection of
web phones may also be limited due to market availability or compatibility
requirements of the wireless service providers. Customers should expect to
receive their web phones within 90 days of funding their accounts. Customers
should expect to receive redemption instructions within four to six weeks of
funding their accounts. Offer must be redeemed no later than 6/30/01.

Commission-free PocketBroker equity orders are restricted to equity orders up
to 1,000 shares. Qualified PocketBroker equity orders must be executed by
June 30, 2001 or will expire without notice. Maximum of $29.95 credit applied
for each commissionable equity order of up to 1,000 shares. Account will be
credited up to 60 days after execution of qualified equity order. Credit will
not be reflected on order screen or subsequent confirmation after trade is
made.

Use of the PocketBroker service is governed by Schwab's Electronic Services
Agreement and the customer's account agreements with Schwab. In order to
access PocketBroker through a web phone, customers must first activate
Internet access to their accounts. Upon activation, Schwab customers will be
able to send eligible equity orders to Schwab using their web phone.

Web phones are manufactured and supplied and wireless service is provided by
independent third parties that are not affiliated with Schwab. Customers are
subject to service levels, terms of service and privacy, security and usage
policies of their wireless service provider. PocketBroker service, including
quotes and news, may be delayed, limited or unavailable due to wireless
coverage limitations, high demand during peak periods, market volatility,
system upgrades, maintenance or for other reasons.

Third-party trade or service marks are the property of their respective
owners.

The Schwab Center for Investment Research is a division of Charles Schwab &
Co., Inc.

If you have questions about this email or other Schwab products, please reply
to this email.?

Access to Electronic Services may be limited or unavailable during periods of
peak demand, market volatility, systems upgrade, maintenance or other reasons.

Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate email system
may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed by Schwab personnel.

,2000 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. All rights reserved. Member SIPC/NYSE
(1100-10723)

[IMAGE]


Thanks for the congratulations.  David of course is pleased about the
promotion but is most anxious to see what dollars come along with it!
Thanks, too, for your comments on the OpRisk session.  It is always a risk to
pull together an audience of 90 and deliver something worthwhile.  --Sally

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Steve Venturatos                           01/23/2001 08:24 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Congratulations, etc...................

First of all congratulations on your promotion, it is well deserved.  You are
really in some rarefied air, since there seem to be very few Managing
Directors.

I also would like to compliment you on putting together one of the best  2
1/2  hour seminars / workshops that I have ever attended ( I know that is
saying a mouthful).  The Operational Risk Meeting / Workshop was not only
informative, but the constantly changing formats kept everyone's attention.
I believe the meeting also caused a renewed enthusiasm among your supervisory
personnel.  This is not only my observation, but the feeling of all of the
people that I have talked to over the past few weeks.

Once again, congrats.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Global No. 96034155 has been changed to 01/01/2000.

Sylvia
---------------------- Forwarded by Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------

Sylvia A Campos
03/03/2000 08:58 AM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cathy Sprowls/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Reliant Energy Field Services Contract 96034155

Please see below and advise on the effective date for contract #1000103 or
should this contract not be used for January business?
Thanks,

Sylvia

---------------------- Forwarded by Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2000
08:41 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Cathy Sprowls                           03/02/2000 02:33 PM

To: Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Reliant Energy Field Services Contract 96034155

Sylvia

ENA nominated Reliant Energy Field Services contract 96034155 on the third
party pipe for January business.  This contract is set up with an effective
date of 02/01/2000 rather than 01/01/2000 in the Global Contracts system.  Is
it possible to change the date in the Global Contracts system, or should we
not have used this contract for January business?

Thanks for your help.

Cathy


Kristin

Another Tiger.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001
09:47 AM ---------------------------

FAP <FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu> on 02/05/2001 08:34:26 AM
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc: FAP <FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu>, "'mvittal@wharton.upenn.edu'"
<mvittal@wharton.upenn.edu>
Subject: addition to Enron-summer internships

Vince:

Please include Ram Vittal to the summer internship list, if you have not
already done so.
According to my count, that make a total of 8 students from the Enron Tiger
Team who have a desire to work with Enron.

Thanks,
Donna

-----Original Message-----
From: Vittal, Maheshram [mailto:mvittal@wharton.upenn.edu]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 10:17 PM
To: 'FAP '
Subject: RE: Call from Enron

Donna:

I had submitted my resume directly to their recruiting office and haven't
heard from them.  I would be very willing to reforward my resume, if
required.

Thanks,
Ram


Guys, it will be very difficult to get money out of the power group - is the
expectation that I come up with the dollars - just curious.  Are we not
circumventing the spirit of the political contribution rules?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000
08:24 AM ---------------------------

Barbara A Hueter@EES
09/29/2000 02:32 PM
To: ddelain2@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Support for key TN lawmakers

---------------------- Forwarded by Barbara A Hueter/DUB/EES on 09/29/2000
03:32 PM ---------------------------

Barbara A Hueter
09/29/2000 03:27 PM
To: Dave Delainey, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron
cc:
Subject: Support for key TN lawmakers

---------------------- Forwarded by Barbara A Hueter/DUB/EES on 09/29/2000
03:27 PM ---------------------------

Barbara A Hueter
09/29/2000 03:24 PM
To: Dave Delaney, John Lavorado, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Support for key TN lawmakers

Gentelmen,

Following is an email detailing requests for personal contributions to
legislators who have been instrumental to Enron regarding our power plants in
Tennessee.  I produced this list based on recommendations from our lobbying
firm, Stokes Bartholomew, in Nashville.

In 1999, Stokes Bartholomew, working with Jordan Mintz in Enron's tax
department, convinced the state legislature to pass legislation clarifying
that Enron's power plants would be exempt from the gross receipts tax.  Had
we not succeeded in the effort, we would have had to pay gross receipts taxes
of approximately $1.5 million per year.

In 2000, Tennessee is one of the only states in the union that has been
running a deficit in the general revenue fund.  Rather than going home for
the summer, the legislature stayed in session and debated among themselves
and with the Governor on how to solve the revenue shortfall issue.
Eventually, they adopted unreasonably  optimistic revenue projections to
produce a balanced budget (on paper).   This has not solved the problem
because the state is already $100 million below revenue projections in the
first quarter of the fiscal year.  The legislature will look for a long term
solution when it returns in January.  Stokes Bartholomew informs me that all
sources of revenue will be considered - this means our exemption from the
gross receipts tax could possibly be repealed.  At this time, no one is
singling this exemption out, but Stokes Bartholomew is cautious and is
monitoring the issue closely.

Numerous legislators supported the gross receipts legislation for Enron.  If
our gross receipts tax exemption is threatened next legislative session, we
would have to return to these same legislators (if they are reelected) for
support.  As long as Enron pays taxes in Tennessee, it behooves us to take an
active interest in supporting those legislators who will defend our interests
in the capitol.

Since you are the key contacts at Enron for Tennessee, I ask you to assess
this matter and decide whether ongoing legislative support is important to
Enron's interests in TN and make contributions accordingly.

I have recommended $9,500 in contributions.  While this seems like a large
amount, it is miniscule in comparison to the taxes we are not paying.
Moreover, it will go a long way to helping us protect our interests against
those who would fight to have "big corporations", particularly out-of-state
corporations, get stuck with additional tax burdens to solve the state's
fiscal woes.

You are probably asking why we are not using Enron PAC funds or coroporate
funds to make these donations.  Tennessee law prohibits us from using
corporate funds and limits the use of PAC funds to those PACs that do not
receive any source of support from the corporation.  Because Enron Corp. pays
the expenses for the Enron PAC, we are not permitted to contribute Enron PAC
funds to candidates in Tennessee.  This is one of the most onerous political
contribution laws in the country.

If you have any questions I can be reached for the next week at
614.306.4359.  Or you can leave a message for me at 614.760.7472.
---------------------- Forwarded by Barbara A Hueter/DUB/EES on 09/29/2000
12:56 PM ---------------------------

Barbara A Hueter
09/14/2000 03:28 PM
To: Ben Jacoby
cc: Rick Shapiro, Janine Migden/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: Support for key TN lawmakers

Per our phone conversation, following is a list of key legislative leaders
deserving of Enron's support.  This list has been developed by our
counsel/legislative agents in Nashville: Bill Bruce, Gif Thornton and Robert
Gowan.

Please feel free to call me to discuss further.  You can reach me on my cell
phone this afternoon and all day tomorrow.  I will be in the office on Monday.

Lieutenant Governor: Senator John Wilder (Democrat)
$2,500
Represents Brownsville in the Senate.
Sponsor of 1999 gross receipts tax exemption legislation for Brownsville.
Has a serious opponent this November.
The Senate elects the Lieutenant Governor who also serves as the head of the
Senate.  It is in Enron's best interst that John Wilder win the election and
be re-elected Lieutenant Governor.

Rep. Jimmy Naifey
$1,000
Speaker of the House
Represents Brownsvile.

Senate Candidate Larry Trail (Democrat)
$2,000
John Wilder's personal mission, besides his own election, is to get Larry
elected to the Senate (it is an open seat that is being vacated by a
Democrat).
If the Democrats lose this seat there is a very good chance that Senator
Wilder will not be re-elected Lieutenant Governor because the Democrats will
have lost the majority in the Senate.

Rep. Matt Kisber (Democrat)
$1,500
Represents the Jackson area.
Very pro-business Democrat.
Is in a very tough race because the district was redrawn and it now majority
Republican.
Matt is the chair of the House Finance, Ways and Means Committee - which
hears all gross receipts tax matters.
Was very helpful to Enron on the gross receipts legislation.

Senator Jerry Cooper
$1,000
Chair of the Senate Commerce Committee
His committee hears all legislation relating to energy and power plants.

Rep. Shelby Rinehart
$500
Chair of Commerce Committe (all energy and power plant issues) and powerful
member of the House Finance and Ways and Means Committee.
He is extremely powerful.  Bill, Gif and Robert have a very good relationship
and rely on him for assistance for their clients regularly.

Unless otherwise noted, checks should be make payable to "Friends of
_______________".

Please forward to Bill Bruce fo personal delivery.  (or if you want to get
them to me I can pass them along)
Bill Bruce
Stokes, Bartholomew, Evans and Petree P.A.
Sun Trust Financial Center
424 Church Street, Suite 2800
Nashville, TN 37219-2386


I don't think I have checked this one.  Nothing with or pertaining to New
World Network however.

Kay C. Young
Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
713-853-6794 Phone
713-646-3393 Fax
kay.young@enron.com

	Tana Jones
	03/23/2001 05:07 PM

		 To: Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New World Network USA, Inc.

I don't know if Mark Greenberg ran this one by you or not, we are already
preparing it for signature, but can you check on this counterparty for NDAs.
Much thanks!


This Transco cheatsheet was created from our regulatory group within logistics...THANKS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Molinaro, Jeffrey
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 9:08 AM
To:	Lamadrid, Victor; Kinsey, Lisa; Sullivan, Patti; Smith, George F.
Cc:	Olinger, Kimberly S.; Calcagno, Suzanne
Subject:	Rates Cheatsheets

Hello all,

In an effort to make rate information more accessible, I have created Rate Cheatsheets for Transco, ANR and Transwestern.  The chestsheets include rates for basic Firm and Interruptible transportation service as well as fuel percentages, surcharges, cash out provisions and overrun information.

More pipelines will be added in the near future.  Let me know if you have any comments or questions.

Thanks,

Jeff


Was Michael's performance outstanding as usual?  It's been very quiet here
this afternoon.  Your little man is so cute!  You need to take a good picture
so I can put it on canvas and frame it for you.  It looks so professional and
expensive.  Or, I could take a picture of your family and do it for you.  I
wish someone would take a photograph of all of us!


Claif Briefing tomorrow
US GEN market power
Linda Breathitt
Jordan Mintz 3-7897
Allegretti


Does EGM management support quoting prices for financial JCC business developed by the Tokyo office? Is so, we need to communicate that to Bill White, Chris Glaas and Richard Slovenski. If not, then we need to tell Joe and his troops. My assesment (and please correct me if I am wrong) is that the long term success of our Singapore and Tokyo offices is dependent on how they interact on physical and financial trades (like Project Sato) in the region.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leach, Doug
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:42 AM
To:	Slovenski, Richard
Cc:	De la roche, Marc; Neale, Nelson
Subject:	JCC

With Joe Hirl in town tomorrow with Nissho Iwai I'm sure the subject of JCC hedging will come up. As you know Marc de la Roche and I have been working with Enron's Research department and it appears Nelson Neale has done some great work on JCC and it's relationship to Brent crude. I also understand that you are not inclined to want to quote prices for the JCC index. Is that a fair statement? Where I become confused is that the management in Houston supports the Tokyo office efforts and yet unless the Global Products Singapore office steps up to help, then neither office will prosper. Trust me, I do not want the Singapore office to bear all of the price/basis risk of the Tokyo office, but if we can't compete with Morgan Stanley or J. Aron then why do we have either office? I will talk to Hirl, Shankman and McConnell and see what they want Global Products to do or not do regarding JCC hedging. Your comments on this subject would be much appreciated.


this is their final version
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT on 02/29/2000
08:49 AM ---------------------------

"Rick Antonoff" <rantonof@cwt.com> on 02/28/2000 06:22:38 PM
To: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Master Netting

Attached below is our memorandum on cross-product and cross-affiliate netting
and setoff.

(See attached file: #108922 v1 - master netting.doc)

|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be   |
|legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you   |
|must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this |
|email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or |
|other defect that might affect any computer system into which it  |
|is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient |
|to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted |
|by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft for any loss or damage arising in|
|any way from its use.                                             |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|

 - #108922 v1 - master netting.doc


Hello Tana,
Please disregard previous email regarding Southern Company Services as it has
already been approved by legal.  Our access database reflected the incorrect
status of legal reviewing and should have been Requested More Info. from
Customer.  I talked to the customer and she faxed me the new PA this morning
& I will process and email her ID and password today.  I apologize for any
confusion that this may have caused.

Thank you ,
Claudia x3-9281
---------------------- Forwarded by Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 09:59
AM ---------------------------

From:  Mary Griff Gray
     08/11/2000 08:07 AM

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Southern Company Services -- status of registration

Tana/Claudia,

According to the Access data base, this customer's registration has been in
Legal for review since June 15th.  What is needed to get this out the door?
The customer is eager to help in any way.

Thanks for your help,
Griff
x35753


Any ideas?  These guys (John & Jere) just can't get it together.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/19/2000
05:14 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
05/19/2000 05:12 PM
To: Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, C John Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Potential Candidates for Reliable Reserves

Jere, I understand your frustruation and I am very motived to prove out the
insurance product; however, I do think John has a legitimate concern
(especially given the fact that this group blew up very publically internally
and externally and we need to repair the image internally and market
perception externally in order to be successful in the future) surrounding
multiple groups covering the same customers with different stories.  You guys
could not work this out - so I offered a compromise position which involved a
well coordinated test marketing iniative (this was agreed to by you and John
at the offsite):
 a) the insurance group was to identify the initial 5 to 10 target customer
list that ENA would pitch the product to which should give us a determination
if this is a commercially viable product;
 b) John and Scott would facilitate the contact with the customers to ensure
a consistent face and story with the customers - if you guys can sit down and
come up with an alternative that works for you - great; regardless, John had
promised me that he would do everything necessary to facilitate and promote
this capability to these customers ASAP;
 c) both groups would put a deal team together and get out there ASAP;
 d) if the test marketing of the product is successful; I agree that we need
to sit down and discuss how we formally allign the interests of these groups.

This appears to be a reasonable and logical approach on an interim basis.

Regards
Delainey

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/19/2000
04:30 PM ---------------------------

Jere C Overdyke
05/18/2000 08:50 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Potential Candidates for Reliable Reserves

We are heading down the road of a gate keeper approach which has proven very
inefficient at Enron in the past.    Our group has already canceled a meeting
with the CFO of Vintage because of this approach.  Rerarding  industry
relationships, George Carrick, Mark Tawney and I have extensive relationships
throughout the upstream sector, know the decision makers and can set up our
own meetings, all in coordination with the upstream group.  At this time I am
waiting on John's group to set up our meetings.  Seems very inefficient.

The main objective is to determine if there is demand for the product.  I
will continue to coordinate through John but we need to meet to clarify roles
and responsibilities of all parties - how will deals be structured, who will
price, who will negotiate transaction, etc.


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/17/99 08:47
AM ---------------------------

"GUEST3" <GUEST3@andrews-kurth.com> on 12/17/99 02:15:47 AM
To: chuck.randall@abnamro.com, kris.grosshans@abnamro.com,
GROVD@andrews-kurth.com, POPPT@andrews-kurth.com, Craig Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald W
Herrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alicia
Goodrow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, paul.riddle@funb.com,
Russell.clingman@funb.com, poneil@kslaw.com, Vbuckley@lockeliddell.com,
mniebruegge@mayerbrown.com, pbrito@mayerbrown.com, Fcampiglia@nabny.com,
john_roberts@paribas.com, Shaun_pacious@paribas.com, eawilburn@prickett.com,
Tamullen@prickett.com, Facciolo@rlf.com, Kenton@rlf.com,
clint.carlin@us.arthurandersen.com, schottla@us.cibc.com,
wolfmark@us.cibc.com, Jlawler@wilmingtontrust.com, bpace@winstead.com
cc: "DAVID BARBOUR" <BARBD@andrews-kurth.com>, "DALLAS GUEST ACCOUNT #2"
<DGUEST2@andrews-kurth.com>
Subject: Project Ghost

Attached in Word are blacklines of the following documents marked to show
changes from the previous versions distributed:

1.  Trust Agreement;
2.  Facility Agreement;
3.  G-Past LLC Agreement;
4.  G-Present LLC Agreement;
5.  G-Future LLC Agreement;
6.  Swap Confirmation;
7.  Swap Schedule; and
8.  Put Option Agreement.

I also attach the form of Reimbursement and Disclosure Agreement, since
people have been saying it was not received in previous distributions.

Danny Sullivan
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
(713) 220-4242

 - 216438.doc
 - 216444.doc
 - 216480.doc
 - 216537.doc
 - 216551.doc
 - 220082.doc
 - 220295.doc
 - 220207.doc
 - 221283.doc


Ted,

Please mark me down for the dinner on Apr 10

Fletch

---------------------- Forwarded by Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001
05:03 PM ---------------------------
From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate@enronXgate on 03/15/2001 05:41 PM
Sent by: Kimberly Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Karen
Buckley/ENRON@enronXgate, Chuck Ames/NA/Enron@Enron, Bilal
Bajwa/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Ballato/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Gim/NA/Enron@Enron, Mog Heu/NA/Enron@Enron, Juan Padron/NA/Enron@Enron, Vladi
Pimenov/NA/Enron@Enron, Denver Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Schiavone/ENRON@enronXgate, Elizabeth Shim/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matt
Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joseph Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron, Jason
Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, Virawan Yawapongsiri/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ted C Bland/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Dinner Invitation - April 10, 2001 (For Trading Track)

You are cordially invited to attend cocktails and dinner on April 10, 2001 at
La Colombe d'Or restaurant located at 3410 Montrose Blvd (a map can be found
at www.lacolombedor.com).  Cocktail hour will start at 7:00 pm with dinner to
follow.

Please note:  this dinner is for the Trading Track Program.

Please RSVP to Ted Bland at extension 3-5275 before April 6, 2001.


I'll have to ask Neil for Michael's SS#.  I don't have it on me.

I know Neil's boss and his boss' boss will have parties.  I think one in on
the 16th and the other on the 30th (stupid day for a party).  Are those good
days for you? I just can't get interested in going to the Enron parties - too
many people.  We could really stand some shopping time (bah humbug), also.

Kay

"Brashear, Charlotte" <cbrashear@velaw.com> on 11/29/2000 09:50:45 AM
To: "Mann Kay (E-mail)" <kmann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:

   When you have a chance, please send me Michael's Social Security
number.

   I'll be glad when you and Neil start going to some Christmas
parties.

   Thanks.
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Sure.  Also, this confirm needs to be tracked b/c counterparty needs to
fulfill a condition for ECT.  SS

Lucy Ortiz
07/06/99 08:44 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Portucel

Per your request.
We need to work on the Fallback.  When would you like to meet?

Rgds,

Lucy


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/07/2001 11:00 AM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	05/04/2001 12:07 PM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (01-147) Use of Letters of Credit, Certain Securities and
Deliverable Warehouse Receipts as Margin...

Notice # 01-147
May 4, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX and COMEX Members and Member Firms

FROM:
Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:
Use of Letters of Credit, Certain Securities and Deliverable Warehouse
Receipts as Margin  for NYMEX and COMEX Transactions

DATE:
May 4, 2001
===========================================================

! Please be advised that the NYMEX Board of Directors has approved changes to
NYMEX and COMEX Clearing Association rules, which have also been filed with
the CFTC, that expand the types of non-cash assets that customers may deposit
with their Clearing Members for margin purposes.

! Specifically, the rule changes, which are attached below, permit the use of
letters of credit, certain securities and deliverable warehouse receipts by
customers to meet their margin requirements. The rule changes provide for
consistent treatment in the use of such assets for both NYMEX and COMEX
Divisions.

! Letters of Credit.  As a result of the rule changes, letters of credit
(LCs) now will be allowed for customer margin on both divisions.

! Use of Letters of Credit on Pass-Through Basis.  In addition, the rule
changes allow letters of credit to be used on a &pass-through8 basis on both
divisions.  In other words, Clearing Members on both divisions will be able
to pledge to the applicable clearinghouse certain LCs posted by customers. It
should be noted that while securities and deliverable warehouse receipts, as
detailed below, may be used by customers for margin purposes, such assets may
not be used on a pass-through basis by a Clearing Member to meet its margin
obligations with the clearinghouse.

! Securities. Customers also will be able to deposit with their Clearing
Members certain types of securities as margin. The types of acceptable
securities are the kinds of securities that have been accepted for some time
on the COMEX Division.  Specifically, the rule changes will permit customers
to deposit the following types of securities as margin with Clearing Members
on either division:

securities listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. or the
American Stock Exchange, Inc., or which are traded in the over-the-counter
market approved for margin by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
Board except that such securities must be free from liens and encumbrances;
can represent no more than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of any one
issuer; and will be valued for purposes of margin at 75% of their market
value.

! Deliverable Warehouse Receipts. On both divisions, deliverable warehouse
receipts for any of the commodities traded on the Exchange will be accepted
as customer margin provided that such receipts will be valued as margin at no
more than 75% of the value of the commodity.

! Effective Date. These rule changes will go into effect on June 1, 2001.

! Exchange Form for Pass-Through Letters of Credit.  A follow-up Notice to
Clearing Members will be distributed shortly that will include a form
prepared by NYMEX that will serve as the authorized  uniform form for
irrevocable letters of credit for use on a pass-through basis at the Exchange
.

If you have any questions concerning this change, please contact Bernard
Purta, Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Operations, at (212)
299- 2380; Arthur McCoy, Vice President, Financial Surveillance Section,
NYMEX Compliance Department, at (212) 299-2928; or Joseph Sanguedolce,
Director, Financial Surveillance Section, NYMEX Compliance Department, at
(212) 299-2855,.

AMENDMENTS TO NYMEX RULE 4.01 (&CUSTOMER,S MARGINS8), NYMEX RULE 9.05
(&MARGINS8) AND TO COMEX CLEARING ASSOCIATION RULE 48 (&DEPOSIT OF SECURITIES
AND LETTERS OF CREDIT AS ORIGINAL MARGIN8)

(Asterisks indicate additions; brackets indicate deletions.)

Rule 4.01. CUSTOMER'S MARGINS

(A) Initial margin at least equal to the level set for customers shall be
required of all customers. In no case shall a customer's initial margin be
less than a specified amount per contract, or a specified percentage of the
market value at which any commodity is bought or sold, such customer's margin
to be determined and announced by the Board of Directors or its designee.

 (B) Once the required initial margin has been deposited for each individual
transaction, such trade and such margin shall, for the purposes of this rule,
lose their individual identity and be commingled with all other trades and
margins in the same commodity for the same customer account.

 (C) When the margin (Net Liquidating Value plus Non-Cash Deposits) in a
customer's account declines below the maintenance margin requirement
applicable to the open positions carried in such account, the Member Firm
carrying said account is required to collect (call) from the customer such
funds, which when deposited, will restore it to the then prevailing initial
margin requirement.

 (D) A Member Firm shall not accept orders for new trades on behalf of an
undermargined customer account other than those which reduce its initial
margin requirement unless such Member Firm has been given assurances by said
customer that funds sufficient to restore the account to its then prevailing
initial margin requirement are forthcoming and will be received in a
reasonable amount of time not to exceed one business day for Floor Members
and three business days for all other customers.

(E)(1) A Member Firm may accept deposits from its customers in one or more of
the following forms as margin to cover open NYMEX Division positions:

 (a) United States Currency; or any currency freely convertible to United
States currency; provided that if foreign currency is deposited, its value
shall be calculated so that at the current rate of exchange the U.S. dollar
equivalent of the foreign currency satisfies the customer's margin obligation.

 (b) securities issued by the Department of the Treasury of the United States
maturing within ten (10) years of the date of the deposit and guaranteed as
to principal and interest by the United States Government. Such securities
shall be valued at ninety five percent (95%) of par value.

*(c) securities which are listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. or the American Stock Exchange, Inc., or which are traded in the
over-the-counter market approved for margin by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve Board provided that such securities; (i) are free from liens
and encumbrances; (ii) represent no more than 5% of the issued and
outstanding shares of any one issuer; and (iii) are valued at 75% of the
market value thereof;

(d) a letter of credit in favor of a clearing member carrying an account, or
in the case of any letter or credit to be used on a pass-through basis with
the Clearing House a letter of credit in favor of the Exchange.  All letters
of credit shall be issued in such form as may be prescribed by the Exchange
and by a depository which has been approved by the Exchange for issuance and
confirmation of letters of credit drawn in favor of the Clearing Members or
in favor of the Exchange, as applicable.

(e) deliverable warehouse receipts for commodities traded on the Exchange
provided that such receipts will be valued as margin at no more than 75% of
the value of the commodity.*

[(c)] *(f)* The net liquidating value in a customer's account over the
initial margin requirements for the positions carried for such account.

(2) A Member Firm may accept deposits from its customers in one or more of
the following forms as margin to cover open COMEX Division positions:

(a) United States currency, checks payable in United States currency, or
currency freely convertible to United States currency; provided that if
foreign currency is deposited, its value shall be calculated so that at the
current rate of exchange the U.S. dollar equivalent of the foreign currency
satisfies the customer's margin obligations;

(b) the net liquidating value in a customer's account over the initial margin
requirements for the positions carried for such account;

(c) securities issued or guaranteed by the United States, provided that such
securities shall be valued at the lower of the par or market value thereof;

(d) securities which are listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. or the American Stock Exchange, Inc., or which are traded in the
over-the-counter market approved for margin by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve Board provided that such securities; (i) are free from liens
and encumbrances; (ii) represent no more than 5% of the issued and
outstanding shares of any one issuer; and (iii) are valued at 75% of the
market value thereof;

(e) *deliverable* warehouse receipts *for commodities traded on the Exchange
provided that such receipts will be valued as margin at no more than 75% of
the value of the commodity*; [provided that such warehouse receipts shall be
valued in accordance with the following:

(i) if the warehouse receipt is for a deliverable grade of the commodity
underlying either the futures contract sold or the futures contract which is
the subject of the call options sold, not more than 90% of the value of the
commodity may be considered as margin; and;

(ii) if the warehouse receipt is for a deliverable grade of the futures
contract purchased or the put options sold, not more than 75% of the value of
the commodity may be considered as margin; and;

(iii) if the warehouse receipt is for either: (A) deliverable grade of a
commodity other than the commodity underlying the futures contract or option
to be margined; or (B) a form of silver or gold not deliverable under a
futures contract, then not more than 75% of the value of the warehouse
receipt may be considered as margin.]

(f) physical commodities (but not forward contracts therefor) if the carrying
member is in possession and control of negotiable documents covering such
commodities, provided, however, that the value of such commodities shall be
based upon the contract market price for the grade of such commodity or if
the commodity is not of a grade deliverable on a contract market, then at the
price for the grade of such commodity on the spot market;

(g) a letter of credit in favor of a clearing member carrying an account*, or
in the case of any letter or credit to be used on a pass-through basis with
the Clearing House a letter of credit in favor of the Exchange.  All letters
of credit shall be* issued in such form as may be prescribed by the Exchange
and by a depository which has been approved by the Exchange for issuance and
confirmation of letters of credit drawn in favor of the Clearing Members *or
in favor of the Exchange, as applicable.*

 (3) Calls issued by Member Firms for additional margin from customers may
only be met by: deposits conforming to the requirements of Rule 4.01(E)(1)
for open NYMEX Division positions, or conforming to the requirements of Rule
4.01(E)(2) for open COMEX Division positions, or, for open positions on
either division of the Exchange, favorable market movements which, when taken
into consideration and combined with any other monies available, enable the
customer's margin to equal or exceed the then prevailing initial margin
requirement.

 (F) Withdrawals of margin from a customer's account may only be permitted by
a Member Firm carrying such account if the remaining funds in such account
are equal to or in excess of the then prevailing initial margin required of
the applicable open positions at the time of said withdrawal request.

(G) The customer's response to a margin call issued by a Member Firm must be
timely and complete. A Member Firm may call, at any time, for margins above
and beyond the minimums required by the Exchange. A Member Firm may liquidate
any or all positions maintained by a customer for failure to meet a margin
call. The customer will be liable for any loss or deficiency resulting
therefrom.

 (H) The margin requirements established by the Board or its designee may
vary for different commodities and may be changed from time to time by the
Board or its designee, and in the discretion of the Board or its designee,
may be made applicable to all open trades as well as new trades.

 (I) Arbitrage

(1) For the purposes of Exchange margin requirements, an arbitrage position
is a purchase or sale of an Exchange futures contract in one delivery month
which futures contract is offset by a futures contract to sell or to purchase
a similar quantity of a related commodity in the same or different delivery
month which offsetting futures contract is executed on or subject to the
rules of a different exchange. In order to qualify as an arbitrage position,
each contract long and short must be carried by the same member firm for the
same account.

(2) The Board of Directors, by resolution, may identify those futures
contracts, that are executable on and/or subject to the rules of a different
exchange, which shall be deemed to qualify as part of an arbitrage position.

(3) The Board of Directors or its designee may set levels of margin for
arbitrage positions at a rate less than applicable to outright positions;
provided, however, that except for interdivision straddles, no such rate
shall be lower than the rates established for clearing members' margins.

Rule 9.05. MARGINS

* * * *
(E) Clearing Members may meet original margin calls by depositing:

(1) Cash (U.S. Currency);

(2) Original Margin Certificates issued by an original margin depository, in
form acceptable to the Clearing House, for delivery to the order of the
Clearing House, representing securities issued by the Department of Treasury
of the United States of America maturing within ten (10) years from the date
of the deposit and guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United
States Government; such securities shall be valued at ninety five percent
(95%) of the par value; or

(3) Subject to a maximum limit of 50% of the Clearing Member's total original
margin obligations, Irrevocable Letters of Credit payable to the order of the
Clearing House *including such Letters of Credit that are deposited with the
Clearing Member in accordance with Exchange procedures by a customer*, in
form acceptable to the Clearing House, issued by or confirmed by an original
margin depository and having an expiration date of not less than three (3) or
more than eighteen (18) months from the date of issuance; provided, however,
that such Letter of Credit may not be used to meet original margin
obligations during the fifteen calendar days prior to the expiration date
thereof (if the fifteenth day prior to the expiration of the Letter of Credit
is not a business day, the period during which such Letter of Credit may not
be used to meet original margin obligations shall begin on the business day
immediately preceding that day); and, provided further, that on the business
d!
ay!
 preceding the fifteenth calendar day prior to the expiration of the Letter
of Credit, the Clearing House shall issue a call for original margin to be
deposited in a form and manner acceptable to the Clearing House for positions
held open as of the close of business on that day and margined by the Letter
of Credit. The Clearing House shall have the unqualified right to call on any
Letter of Credit at any time prior to expiration.

CCA Rule 48. DEPOSIT OF SECURITIES AND LETTERS OF CREDIT A ORIGINAL MARGIN

* * * *
(b) Irrevocable Letters of Credit.

(i) The Corporation will accept as original margin for the full face amount
thereof a letter of credit in favor of the Corporation issued by any
institution selected by the depositor *including such Letters of Credit in
favor of the Corporation that are deposited with the Clearing Member in
accordance with Exchange procedures by a customer*, provided that

(A) such  institution has been approved by the Board as an approved
depository or such institution is organized under the laws of the United
States or the laws of any state and the letter of credit issued by such
institution has been confirmed by an approved depository;
(B) that the aggregate amount of letters of credit which may be accepted at
any time from any one approved depository, or for the account of any one
Clearing Member may be limited by the Board from time to time;
(C) that a letter of credit issued on behalf of a Clearing Member by an
institution which is an affiliated firm of such Clearing Member must be
confirmed by an institution which is not an affiliated firm of such Clearing
Member; and
(D) such letter of credit shall be in form and substance approved by the
Board and shall be in such denominations as may be determined by the Board
from time to time; shall be irrevocable, shall be available to be drawn upon
by the Corporation by  a clean sight draft(s) or written demand(s) and shall
run for a period of not less than ninety (90) days from the date of issue.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdoc
=(01-147)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Debra,
Thank you for sending your GISB agreement.  I have forwarded it onto AK
Steel for them to review and sign.

However, in the meantime it has been brought my attention that there is a
master agreement in place between AK Steel and Enron North America.  If this
is the case then we can work off of the master agreement.  Please let me
know if you know of a master agreement already in existence.

Thank you,
Julie

Julie Wentz
Bid Coordinator
EnergyGateway.com
614-899-2900 ext 113

This message, including any attachments, contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
Please call with any questions.  614-899-2900.

-----Original Message-----
From: Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com [mailto:Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 6:27 PM
To: jwentz@energygateway.com
Subject: Agreement

Julie,

Further to our conversation, please see the attached GISB draft for your
review.

(See attached file: A K Steel   GISB.doc)

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


I've attached recent FT articles on Argentina, Japan and New Zealand as
possible topics for section discussion tommorow.

Also, as always please bring any clarifying questions you might have
from the last lecture.

Bhash
 - New Zealand.doc
 - Japan.doc
 - Argentina.doc


Shirley,

Please, send him my bio.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
09:00 AM ---------------------------

"Andreas Simou" <andreas@garpmail.com> on 09/06/2000 11:01:11 AM
To: <hansruedi.schuetter@csg.ch>
cc:
Subject: The GARP 2001 Convention

Dear GARP 2001 Speaker
?
Just a gentle reminder that the information I  requested for your
presentation at the GARP 2001 Convention,  was due in today. Can I please
have this information by Friday 8th  September so that I will have adequate
time to include all the details  in the brochure, which is due to go to press
very shortly.

The  information that I require as soon as possible is as follows:
1. confirmation of professional details (including  the speaker's name, job
title, and organisation)
2. confirmation that the topic title is accurate  and to your liking
3. bullet points for your presentation (up to 5 to  6 bullet points - please
as technical and detailed as possible)
4. contact details (including telephone numbers,  fax no, colleague/PA, full
address)
?
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to  contact me, otherwise I
look forward to receiving the above information by  Friday 8th September.
?
Kind regards
?
Andreas

____________________________
Andreas  Simou
GARP 2001 - Conference Producer
Tel? +44 (0) 20 7626  9301
Fax +44 (0) 20 7626 9900


Kellie-

I researched the statements you sent me and found deal ticket #109925 in
Sitara which shows HPLC transporting on Midcon from Live Oak to Hardy Street
for $.04/mm for the months of August and September.

The statement for November covers gas moving from Katy tailgate to Cogen
Lyondell and is covered by Sitara deal ticket #133257.  The deal ticket shows
a zero rate, however.  Elsa/Daren- do either of you remember this deal?  It
was on November 30th for 5000mm.  Kellie- what is Midcon charging for this
haul?

Thanks.


Folks let's review the facts and get an answer to the customer.
1- In July of 1999, we sent a draft ISDA to NSPI (10MM Line because their
excellent credit)
2- In October 1999, NSPI sent comments back-- No one from Enron ever
responded.
3- In July 2000 I sold NSPI q1-01 and q4-01 weather pust
4- On February;13th, 2001i sent an email to B reves, T Jones and; asking that
an updated ISDA be sent to the cusatomer as they had undergone a name change
and we wanted the ISDA to cover weather deals. ( a copy is attached)
5- The customer is still without a document and their letter of October 1999
remains unanswered.
6- Can we please get this issue resolved.

;

From: Jennifer Fraser 13/02/2001 15:10

;  ;
;

 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON

 cc: "Don Keith" <donald keith,

 Subject: ISDA for Nova Scotia Power

Tana and Brant:

We sent an ISDA to NSPI ( Nova Scotia Power Inc) on July 28, 1999. The CP
would like to get an updated copy in order to have an agreement in place. We
have done some financial deals (2 weather puts). I believe they are also an
active counterparty with us in coal (physical).

Can you please send an updated agreement to

Don Keith

Treasurer

Nova Scotia Power Inc.

1894 Barrington St 9th Floor

Scotia Square

Halifax NS

Canada

B3J 3 A8

Phone 902- 428-6848

fax; 902-428-6181

The website for the CP is http://www.nspower.ca/

Their finacials can be found at http://www.emera.com/

Please note that NSPI (Emera) is a publicly traed utility -- they are not
gov't owned.

;
;
-----Original Message-----
From: Lassander, Richard
Sent: Mon 21/05/2001 18:33
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Cc:
Subject: NSPI - ISDA

Jen,
An update with regards to the Nova Scotia Power ISDA. After several days of
trying to hunt down Brant Reves he referred me to Rudwell Johnson in Credit.
He in turn sent me back to Tana Jones because there is an ISDA issued and you
don't have to renew it if it is already in place. I go back to Tana Jones to
see if the ISDA sent to Nova Scotia in July 1999 included Weather
Derivatives. Tana Jones referred me back to Sara Shackleton. I left a voice
mail with Sara this afternoon. Through this process I found out that the ISDA
sent to NSPI in July 1999 was never executed and we need to execute it before
we can do any deals with them. I was under the impression that we already
have been doing deals with them.

;

Richard Lassander
Enron Global Markets
Phone: 713-345-7600
Fax: 713-758-8400


An update...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/19/2000 02:46
PM ---------------------------

michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com on 06/19/2000 02:04:19 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc: karla.hesketh@us.abb.com, frank.chmiel@us.abb.com

Subject: LM 6000 Transformers

Kay,
Below are the prices as well as the ex-work factory dates (ship dates).  As
Ben
and Frank and I discussed last Friday this is what we need the option
extension
to the 30th of June to reflect.  Please give me a call when you can.  We need
to
get this done this PM if at all possible.  Frank and I will both be out of our
offices for the rest of the week and this will get very difficult.

Thanks

MIIKE
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael O
Sandridge/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB on 06/19/2000 01:58 PM
---------------------------

 (Embedded     Frank Chmiel/StLouis/USTRA/ABB
 image moved   06/16/2000 03:48 PM (Phone: +(314) 679-4702)
 to file:
 pic04072.pcx)

To:   Ben.jacoby@enron.com
cc:   Michael O Sandridge/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB@ABB_USTRA, Karla
      Hesketh/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB@ABB_USTRA, Dennis
      Bowman/StLouis/USTRA/ABB@ABB_USTRA
Subject:  LM 6000 Transformers

Ben,
     This note is based on the information provided to me earlier today by
Mike
Sandridge and confirms what the adjusted values would be for each tarnsformer
type, making the following conditions:

1-The quantity of transformers released under the agreement would be decreased
to 10.
2-The option payments for the ten production slots have been deducted, as
shown
below, along with the remaining net price / each transformer type.
3- Two of the $50,000 non-refundable optional production slot payments  are
cancelled. (LNL 9521-3 and 4)
4- In order to meet the terms of the latest agreement, the contract should be
signed by June 19,2000.  If that is not practical, at a minimum, the 10%
progress payment against the value of the contract would be due for wire
transfer immediately. That value would be 10% of $7,884,600 = $788,460.00.

     Therefore the Equipment Pricing Table is revised as shown below.

|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
|          |                |                |                |
| Table    | Primary        | ABB Neg.       | ABB Data Sheet |
| Item     | Voltage        | Number         | #              |
|          |                |                |                |
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
  >--------------------------------|
  |                                |
  | Quantity / Net Price ($) /     |
  | Each                           |
  |                                |
  >--------------------------------|
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
|          |                |                |                |
| Item 1   | 138 to         | FC011400-2C    | HU-Enron-2C    |
| (3       | 13.8-13.8      |                |                |
| winding) | (64/85/106)MVA |                |                |
|          |                |                |                |
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
  >--------------------------------|
  |                                |
  | Two (2) @ $610,300.00          |
  |                                |
  | ($768,000-50,000-107,700 =     |
  | $610,300)                      |
  |                                |
  >--------------------------------|
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
|          |                |                |                |
| Item 2   | 230 / 115 kV   | FC011400-1C    | HU-Enron-1C    |
| (3       | to             |                |                |
| winding) | 13.8-13.8 KV   |                |                |
|          | (64/85/106)MVA |                |                |
|          |                |                |                |
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
  >--------------------------------|
  |                                |
  | Six (6) @ $834,000.00          |
  |                                |
  | ($884,000-50,000 =             |
  | $834,000)                      |
  |                                |
  >--------------------------------|
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
|          |                |                |                |
| Item 3   | 138 / 13.8 KV  | FC011400-2D-LS | HU-Enron-2D-LS |
| (2       | (84/112/140)   |                | (Low Sound)    |
| winding) |                |                |                |
|          |                |                |                |
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
  >--------------------------------|
  |                                |
  | Two (2) @ $830,000.00          |
  |                                |
  | ($858,000+22,000-50,000=       |
  |  $830,000)                     |
  |                                |
  >--------------------------------|

     The ABB Performance data sheets that match up to the three designs that
will be shown in the contract are also attached herein.----------------------
(See attached file: TecFC011400_2C.doc)  (See attached file:
TecFC011400_1C.doc)
(See attached file: TecFC011400_2D_LS.doc)

The revised arrangement for schedules and trigger dates is as follows:
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   ABB   | Trigger  | Delivery  | Number |    MVA    |  High   | Comments  |
|  Item   | Date for |  Date Ex  |   of   |  Rating   |  Side   |           |
|   No.   |  Design  |  Factory  | Windin |           | Voltage |           |
|         |  Issues  |           |   gs   |           |         |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | May 11,  | Oct. 20,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 138 kV  |  City of  |
| 9521-1  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |         |  Austin   |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | May 11,  | Oct. 20,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 138 kV  |  City of  |
| 9521-2  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |         |  Austin   |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | May 29,  | Nov. 17,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-1  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | May 29,  | Nov. 17,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-2  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | May 29,  |  Dec. 1,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-3  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | June 19, |  Dec. 1,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-4  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | June 19, | Dec. 15,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-5  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|     LNL |   June   | Dec.      | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-6  | 19,      | 15,2000   |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |   2000   |           |        |           |         |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
| LNL9518 | July 10, |  Aug. 1,  |  Two   | 84/112/14 | 138 kV  | Las Vegas |
|    -    |   2000   |   2001    |        |   0 MVA   |         |           |
|    1    |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
| LNL9518 | July 10, |  Aug. 1,  |  Two   | 84/112/14 | 138 kV  | Las Vegas |
|    -    |   2000   |   2001    |        |   0 MVA   |         |           |
|    2    |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|

Hope this covers the open issues .
     Regards,
     Frank Chmiel

 - pic04072.pcx
 - TecFC011400_2C.doc
 - TecFC011400_1C.doc
 - TecFC011400_2D_LS.doc


______________________________________

jcrew.com
______________________________________

** up to 30% off **

up to 30% off lots of great styles! Check out our in-season sale.
http://click.jcrew.com/cgi-bin8/flo?y=eHEF0Sgo10Cl10PHg0Ah

gift guide - shop according to our best gift ideas, the amount you'd
like to spend, or get a gift card.
http://click.jcrew.com/cgi-bin8/flo?y=eHEF0Sgo10Cl10PHq0Ar

Order up until noon EST on 12/21, and we'll guarantee delivery in time
for the holidays.

go to our women's directory
http://click.jcrew.com/cgi-bin8/flo?y=eHEF0Sgo10Cl10PHo0Ap

go to our men's directory
http://click.jcrew.com/cgi-bin8/flo?y=eHEF0Sgo10Cl10PHp0Aq

go to our kids' directory
http://click.jcrew.com/cgi-bin8/flo?y=eHEF0Sgo10Cl10PHn0Ao

Unsubscribe:  To be removed from the jcrew.com
mailing list, please go to
http://click.jcrew.com/cgi-bin8/flo?y=eHEF0Sgo10Cl10PHs0At&email=lcampbel@enron.com


Updated Core/Non-Core Analysis for 11am PDT/1pm CDT meeting


Guys--

First of all, Louise, I understand we have a baby??  CONGRATULATIONS!!
(details please, at your earliest chance)

Regarding the Wharton e-Business Initiative (see below for one of the many
eMails I've received concerning Enron's participation--link to the referenced
web site for specific agenda; also, I've received several voice messages from
leaders of the effort).  The information below discusses one of the  forums
(coming up 5/31-6/1) that comprise an on-going e-business initiative in which
Enron has invested with Wharton.

 The participants from Wharton include senior level professors; while there
may be some student involvement, the intentional focus is high level
discussion and research endeavors at the professorial level.
Other participants in WeBI are Corporate representatives.  The idea is for
the professors to offer their latest research issues, promote discussions
among the corporate participants to talk through the professors research and
other research in the literature, as well as for the professors to listen for
new areas for which commercial eBusinesses are seeking new research.

Again,  this is intentionally designed as a High Level Professor
participation on the Wharton side, and high level e-Business Corporate
executives on the other side. This is intentionally designed to create a
high-level 'e-think-tank' environment for senior level professors and
corporate executives.

O.K.....have I labored enough to describe what WeBI is all about??

As opposed to the several other efforts Enron University Affairs has to
DIRECTLY increase Enron's favorability and familiarity on campus at levels
above recruiting, but that ultimately trickle down to recruiting, this is
intentionally a research/discussion effort. Clearly, the Enron Brand equity
in dealing with professors is that the professors ultimately incorporate work
from information from the participatory forums into their class teachings,
references, course work, etc.

A few weeks ago, Louise and I breifly chatted about Enron's involvement in
this effort.  Clearly, there is a HUGE interest by the Wharton professors and
other corporate participants involved to have Enron attend and
participate---they quite respectfully call me and eMail me very
frequently.......All of this is very interesting to me and I have shepherded
our minimal involvement-in-fact........ yet the question remains:  is there
someone at Enron, directly involved in Enron's eBusiness initiatives,
interested in jumping into this effort and participating?  Do those of you
involved in these businesses think it worth your time and expense, or the
time and expense of one of your senior (at least Director level) people to
participate?  Would it be viewed, at least at this time,  simply as an "Enron
brain drain" (I've received this realistic and possibly quite legitimate
concern from more than one business person at Enron).

The bottom line is, I'd like to be able to respond intelligently and honestly
to those at Wharton committed to this effort.  I feel more than comfortable
telling Wharton that, at this time, Enron is satisfied to participate in the
WeBI effort largely at the
financial level it has already invested--with the option to participate at
other levels in the future, at Enron's discretion.

ALL comments solicited----

Many thanks!!

--Christie.

---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001
04:02 PM ---------------------------

HartleyR <HartleyR@wharton.upenn.edu> on 05/21/2001 03:03:44 PM
To: "'Christie_Patrick@enron.com'" <Christie_Patrick@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: ICG/Wharton Forum meeting May 31-June 1

Christie,

Lee Goldring, our new Forum director mentioned that he placed a call to you
to introduce himself and follow up on Enron's representation at the next
meeting.  I'm emailing this information to you to alert you to the situation
since I do not think you would want Enron to go unrepresented at the next
meeting. To date, no one from Enron has registered for the Forum sponsored
Online Conversion Workshop,  the Forum meeting on 5/31 or the Members Only
meeting on 6/1.  Please note that the "From Browsers to Buyers: Online
Conversion Workshop" on May 30th is purely optional in case some folks from
Enron are interested in attending.  Since the Forum is co-sponsoring the
Workshop -- WeBI affiliated registrants will not be charged the $495
registration fee as an added benefit for their sponsorship.

Here are all the relevent links to the Forum agenda and registration sites
for your convenience:

Forum Agenda:  http://webi.wharton.upenn.edu/meetingNotes/m_n_5_01.asp
Forum Registration site: http://ecom.wharton.upenn.edu/conferencereg/Reg.asp

From Browsers to Buyers: Online Conversion Workshop:
http://aresty-direct.wharton.upenn.edu/execed/conversion/index.html

Please let me know if there's anything I can help you with.

Best regards,

Robin

Robin Hartley
Associate Director
Wharton Electronic Business Initiative

University of Pennsylvania
Vance Hall - Room 415
3733 Spruce Street
Philadelphia, PA  19104
tel (215) 898-4158/fax (215) 898-1905
hartleyr@wharton.upenn.edu
http://webi.wharton.upenn.edu


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/27/99 11:17
AM ---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/27/99 08:00:55 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: January 2000 Tn Zn 6 volumes

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/27/99
08:07 AM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
12/22/99 03:58 PM

To: Karen Bobb/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Phil
Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel
Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Melissa
Flewellyn/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Brian
Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Frank Kronz/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: January 2000 Tn Zn 6 volumes

Here are the approximate January daily volumes for each of the gates.   Please
do not forget that January 1 and January 2 will be lower because of the
weekend/holiday.    I know you wanted an exact volume for 1/1 but I will not
have that for all Tennessee Zn 6 markets until Monday, 12/27.  We will need a
range from 2800 dth to 3600 dth per day.   This large swing is normal for
these
types of markets due to weekends, weather, and customer situations.

 - tn012000.xls


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil63.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded63.pdf

Scott Mollner Recommendation
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/recom1-11-02.pdf


Please confirm the following nominations for the Griffith Power Plant for
the weekend of January 19 - 22, 2002.

Saturday the 19th  -- No nominations needed

Sunday the 20th --  26758 for 7,000 mmbtu's.  Total Burn for the day 7,000
mmbtu's.

Monday the 21st -- 26758 for 8,000 mmbtu's  and 26372 for 25,000 mmbtu's.
Total Burn for the day 33,000.

Tuesday the 22nd --26758 for 8,000 mmbtu's and 26372 for 25,000 mmbtu's.
Total Burn for the day 33,000.

If you have any questions, please call me at (801) 531-5442 or my cell at
(801) 556-4475.

Thank you!

Becky Newson
Duke Energy


She is still the mother of your child so please try and rise above.  This is
in Payton's best interest.  What goes around comes around in life.
Especially when you do the right thing.  Always remember that.


&Enron has become aware that Company employees have been solicited for
participation in &gifting clubs.8  These clubs appear to be illegal pyramid
schemes.  If you are approached about joining a club, but aren,t sure if it,s
an illegal gifting club, contact the Better Business Bureau or your personal
legal counsel.   Employees should not in any way or manner associate Enron
Corp., its affiliated companies or Enron management with the type of clubs
described above.

Please be advised that use of the Company,s premises without management,s
prior approval or use of any of the Company,s communication services
equipment (i.e. email, fax machines, telephones, etc.) for non-Enron business
related ventures is against Company policy."


FYI

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2000
02:11 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary W Lamphier                           03/22/2000 02:10 PM

To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CLMP Outage

---------------------- Forwarded by Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2000
02:09 PM ---------------------------

groetzingerp@valero.com on 03/22/2000 11:11:52 AM
To: gary.w.lamphier@enron.com
cc: oliverd@valero.com
Subject: CLMP Outage

Gary - latest update on Clear Lake Methanol plant outage.

----- Forwarded by Pete Groetzinger/PEUSA on 03/22/2000 11:10 AM -----

                    Danny Oliver
                                         To:     Pete Groetzinger/PEUSA@PEUSA
                    03/22/2000           cc:
                    11:07 AM             Subject:     CLMP Outage

As you are aware, we broke a shaft in the MUG compressor on the methanol
unit at Clear Lake on Saturday March 11th.  We originally anticipated a two
week outage for repairs.  Unfortunately, due to delays in the delivery of a
coupling needed to finish repairs, we have extended the downtime for
another week.  We hope to be up April 2nd or 3rd if all goes well.


yes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gerard, Camille
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:42 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	is this you?


I have this date forwarded these three confirmation agreements to Gary
Lamphier for his further handling with his counterparties.  I will let you
know if they get executed.


Do you have a list of the PX participants committee that you could send me by
e-mail.