Leslie,

My changes/comments are as shown

Justin

Leslie Hansen
04/08/2000 19:41
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Legal & Privacy Statement for EOL

Justin:

We have not yet put the new EOL version on-line.  It will be rolled out in
the next week or so as far as I know.  Do you have any other requested
changes or additions?

Leslie

	Justin Boyd
	08/04/2000 01:32 PM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Legal & Privacy Statement for EOL

Leslie - if this is possible, I would prefer for the EnronOnline L&P
statement to contain the new text I had suggested for ClickPaper.com.

However, where do we stand in terms of making the changes to the EnronOnline
L&P statement - has this been done yet or are we just about to put the new
EOL version online?

Thanks.
Justin

Leslie Hansen
04/08/2000 17:06
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Legal & Privacy Statement for EOL

Justin:

Travis recently forwarded to me the language you proposed adding to Section 4
of the ClickPaper Terms and Conditions for Use:

"For European Union residents: please note that Enron Europe Finance &
Trading Limited is authorized to carry on investment business in the United
Kingdom by the UK Securities and Futures Authority (SFA) and had reviewed and
approved the contents of this website for relevant regulatory purposes. The
services referred to in this website are intended only for commercial
enterprises and not for private customers as defined by the rules of SFA.
Enron will not enter into transactions with persons who would be regarded as
private customers under the rules of SFA.  For Belgian residents: please note
that, pursuant to the Belgian law of 14 July 1991 on Commercial Practices,
this website is to be considered as being advertising (reclame/publicit,)."

Section 4 of the EnronOnline Legal and Privacy statement contains a similar
provision stated in a somewhat different manner.  Whereas the above language
specifically provides, "The services referred to in this website are intended
only for commercial enterprises and not for private customers as defined by
the rules of SFA. Enron will not enter into transactions with persons who
would be regarded as private customers under the rules of SFA."  Section 4 of
the EOL Legal and Privacy states only that "The website is intended only for
commercial enterprises in certain specified jurisdictions."

Do you want me to revise Section 4 of the EOL Legal and Privacy statement to
conform to the ClickPaper language or are you comfortable with the EOL
language as currently drafted.

I have attached a final version of the EOL Legal and Privacy statement for
your review and reference.

Regards,

Leslie


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001
10:56 AM ---------------------------
From: Paula Corey@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 03/01/2001 09:56 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Doreen

V -

I spoke with Doreen this morning re: our San Francisco project. Please
forward info to her at

  doreen@magdalinweiss.com

Are you up fro brunch at my house on Sunday with Bill and Mary? Kathryn will
be home on midterm break

P -


I'm out of the office until later this morning.  I'll give you a call.
However, for future reference, my number is 678-579-3061.

Steve Brown (remote)


Gentlemen,

We just delivered signed documents to EES on Project Blackwater and the deal
has effectively closed.  Thank you very much for all of your hard work over
the last couple of weeks and particluarly over the last couple of days.  This
was a tough deal with a lot of moving parts and your participation in getting
the first long-term power deal done with EES for Enron Compression Services
Company is greatly appreciated.  We look forward to working on additional
deals with more innovative structures going forward into 2001.

Sincerely,
Chris Hilgert


FUN!  Copy this email onto a new email (don't fwd),insert your responses,
and send out to learn FASCINATING things about friends you have likely known
since birth!

1. Living Arrangement:
let's not go there

2. What book are you reading now?
The Great Santini & Preservation Principles of Colonial Era Structures (no,
seriously)
3. What is on your mouse pad?
    huh?
4. Favorite Game? castlevania on nintendo  (...64, you snobs)

5. Favorite Magazine?
   architectual digest/ martha stwart living
6. Favorite Smells?
   puppy breath
7. Favorite Sounds?
   piano
8. Worst feeling in the world?
   rt when you realize you'll be vomiting all day
9.What is the first thing you do when you wake up?
brush teeth
10. Favorite Color? red
11. How many rings before you answer the phone? i don't
12. Future child's name? what child?
13. What is most important in life? family, friends, integrity

14. Favorite foods? chicken and dumplings

15.Chocolate or Vanilla? chocolate

16. Like to drive fast? just efficiently
17.Do you sleep with a stuffed animal? i'll take the 5th

8. Storms (Cool or Scary) Cool
19. What type was your first car? jeep
20. What one person dead or alive would you like to meet?   georgia o'keefe
or jesus christ

21. What is your Zodiac sign? libra

22.  Favorite alcoholic drink? hmmmmm....
23. Do you eat the stems of broccoli? if there's velveeta on them

24. What job do you dream of having? internat'l architect, curator @
monitcello
25. If you could dye your hair any color? jet black chinese bob
26. Have you ever been in love? yes

27. Is your glass 1/2 Full or 1/2 Empty?  1/2 empty

29. Favorite movies? the graduate, spinal tap, parenthood
30.Do you type with your fingers on the right keys? god, no

30. What's under your bed? layers of crap dating back to the late 80's

31. What is your favorite number?  3

32. Your favorite sport to watch?  basketball
33. Say one nice thing about the person who sent this to you. brittany has
always had great work ethic.....and is always easy and good to talk to even
if you are a lazy bum and haven't called or emailed in months
32.Person you sent this to who is most likely to respond? lisa
35. Of the people you sent this to, who is not likely to respond? boys!

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.


With the first round of RTO filings and responses complete, it is a good time
to step back and review the highs and lows that occurred in 2000 and lay out
our plan going into 2001.

A. 2000 Key Facts --

1. FERC CONTINUES TO RELY UPON MONOPOLIES TAKING VOLUNTARY ACTIONS.

It does not appear that FERC (in its current form) will modify its standing
policy that RTO formation is a voluntary process designed to let 1,000
flowers bloom.  While Enron continues to ask FERC and FERC staff to take a
different position, we have seen no signals that anything will change.  Faced
with this policy, as the initial RTO filings made clear, almost all utilities
are going to fight pretty hard not to have to give up their strategic
transmission assets.  Accordingly, most of the proposed RTOs do not remove
the fundamental problem - the Native Load exception.

2. THE MIDWEST CAN'T MAKE UP ITS MIND ABOUT WHICH RTO IS BEST.

The MISO continues to lose its members to the Alliance RTO.  The three big
utilities that have declared their intention to switch sides include ComEd,
IP, and Ameren (probably 40% of total load in initial MISO).   Key problems
for the MISO include (a) MISO's not-for-profit status (key IP claim), (b)
parties interest in taking energy east (key ComEd need), and (c) fair
retention of 3rd party wheeling revenues (Ameren want).    Meetings with
regional stakeholders (public power, industrials, State PUCs) have been
productive in terms of getting agreement that one single RTO is the preferred
option, however we await action from the FERC.  MISO is also telling everyone
that can listen that if the big three pull out, it probably won't continue.
While the MISO process is very open to the public (not so with the Alliance
RTO), neither MISO nor the Alliance RTO have progressed far enough into the
details to fully determine if our policy objectives will be met.

3. SOUTHERN AND GRID SOUTH DID PRETTY MUCH AS EXPECTED - NOTHING.

Rather than take a major step forward, Southern and Grid South (SCANA, CP&L,
Duke) have initially filed non-compliant RTOs.  Grid South does nothing to
advance a market, much less provide transmission service in a
non-discriminatory fashion.  In fact, Grid South simply takes the current 888
OATT and "combines" the three utilities for wheeling through purposes.

4. PJM CONTINUES TO BE FERC'S SHINING LIGHT.

PJM was the only functioning ISO that filed with FERC earlier than was
necessary (rumor has it that FERC invited PJM to file early to set the "right
example").  PJM declares itself to be fully in compliance with Order 2000 in
that filing.  PJM is also expanding.  So far, Allegheny Power and DQE have
agreed in principle to allow PJM to operate a parallel control area called
PJM West.  In terms of market coordination, PJM has been publicly reluctant
to get involved in working to try to integrate the tight Eastern pools (PJM,
NYISO,  NE-ISO, and Ontario IMO).   The other pools are not getting very much
accomplished in their efforts.  For example, NE-ISO has indicated that it
won't have the Day-Ahead market ready until 2003 at the earliest.

5. ERCOT LOOKS LIKE IT WILL START ITS WHOLESALE MARKET ON TIME.

ERCOT is pressured to initiate its wholesale market by the needs of retail
access (pilot program beginning next summer).  The rules are still being
structured.  We are working to ensure that the tight deadlines don't
overwhelm good market structure.   Robin Kittel and Ron McNamara are leading
our efforts and are very active.

6. SURPRISINGLY FLORIDA IS MOVING ALONG

In a surprise move, the actions so far in Grid Florida, while certainly not
perfect, appear to be moving in the right direction.  The FL PSC has gone
from saying never to asking FERC for assistance in getting the rules right.
Governor Bush has set up a task force to study wholesale competition during
this Legislative session; Enron will be involved.

B. 2001 Steps -

1. FOCUS THE POLITICOS ON RTOs AND ENDING THE NATIVE LOAD EXCEPTION.

FERC will have new leadership some time in early 2000 (if we can get a
President).  Enron is developing a coordinated political plan (Capitol Hill,
media, Administration, industry allies) to impress upon the next
Administration and FERC Chairperson that mandates are necessary to continue
to drive wholesale market reforms.  Without a stronger mandate, it may prove
difficult to have functioning RTOs by the end of 2001.  More importantly, it
will take specific policy changes at FERC or within the state during retail
wheeling proceedings to win the Native Load exception fight.  In those RTOs
that have determined not to agree to ending the Native Load exception, no
amount of meetings or filings will change the parties.

2. COORDINATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS SUPPORT MORE CLOSELY WITH THE DESK.

It is our intention to have a full time person working from the Desk to
ensure that Enron's objectives are clearly presented to the developing RTOs.
The goal is to work alongside Christi Nicolay and the commercial teams to
coordinate day-to-day activities of our RTO staff and make sure that no
opportunity is missed.  This should ensure that Enron is advocating the needs
of the commercial teams.   We continue to have at least one person dedicated
to each RTO market.

NYISO   -  Howard Fromer
NE-ISO  -  Dan Allegretti
IMO   - Aleck Dadson
PJM  - Tom Hoatson
MISO/Alliance - Jeff Brown / Dave Mangskau
Grid South - Tom Chapman / Joe Connor
Southern  - Joe Connor
Florida  - Dan Staines
SPP  - Ron McNamara
ERCOT  - Robin Kittel

Mike Roan from New Zealand will be arriving in early January to help out.
Luiz Maurer is coming from Brazil in June / July to also work on wholesale
market issues.

3. PUSH INTEGRATION OF THE TIGHT NORTHEAST POOLS.

NE-ISO and NYISO are required to file their plans for RTO status on January
15, 2001.  While these pools have signed an MOU to discuss integration
matters, not much progress has been made to date.  Moving power between the
pools continues to be difficult given the different protocols and scheduling
rules.  FERC is aware of these problems.  Again, FERC has not done anything
to mandate compliance with Order 2000.  We have deployed an additional
resource in Houston recently to help support Enron's involvement in the tight
pool seams issues and make sure that the Desk is being made aware of all
developments as close to real-time as possible.

4. CONTINUE TO FIGHT IN THE TRENCHES.

The list of people above continue to have day to day responsibility for
ensuring full coverage of all relevant meetings of each RTO.  We continue to
advocate our agenda (to anyone that will listen).   This work is time
consuming (much spent listening to "junk" from monopolist Transmission
Owners) and detailed.  Enron made solid filings in response to the RTOs
initial work and will continue to respond in a manner that best leverages our
resources.

5. FIND THE GRID OPERATOR FOR PROJECT e-trans.

Project e-trans has resulted in a new business consortium -
etransconsortium.com.  This combination of APX, Cal PX, and Alstom ESCA has
developed the necessary pieces of software and systems to provide the "market
front-end" for any RTO (e.g., day-ahead market, transmission exchange,
etc.).  Enron has also finished drafting a detailed tariff that incorporates
our policy objectives.  We are now turning our attention to finding the right
Grid Operator.  We are in discussions with National Grid, American
Transmission Company, MISO, and PJM (although they may want to do something
very similar).  The goal remains the same -- to have a fully functioning
entity that can provide turnkey solutions to any Transmission Owner and use
this entity to leverage FERC to take more dramatic action.  I will be taking
a larger role in this activity as it moves forward in 2001.

6. DON'T FORGET ABOUT THE NEED FOR MORE RETAIL ACCESS AND GENERATION
DIVESTITURE

Government Affairs also will continue to attempt to drive additional markets
through direct access and divestiture.  It will take (1) non-discriminatory
transmission access, (2) retail choice, and (3) generation divestiture to
enable a fully thriving wholesale market.  Of course, additional market
openings face the political questions raised due to the crisis in California.

I hope this helps put some framework around our activities.  If anyone wants
to discuss this in more detail, I'd be happy to meet individually or as a
group.

Jim


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000
05:09 PM ---------------------------

	From:  David W Delainey                           10/16/2000 01:49 PM

Sent by: Kay Chapman
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed
McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Hunter S
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barry Tycholiz/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Melissa Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Venita
Coleman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Geraldine Irvine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amanda
Huble/NA/Enron@Enron, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Crystal Blair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn
Pikofsky/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mollie
Gustafson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Harder/Corp/Enron@Enron, Angela McCulloch/CAL/ECT@ECT, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Strategy Meeting

Dave would like to have a strategy meeting next Tuesday  October 17, 2000,
from 3:00-5:00 pm in room 30C1. No preparation is necessary and it's
important that each of you plan to attend.

If you cannot attend, please contact Dave directly.

Laura - please phone in 713-853-9631

Frank Vickers - - Video Conf.
Barry Tycholiz--  Video Conf.


We can't increase Fuels Cotton Valley right now.  Please
assume nom of 60,000 MMBtu w/ 53,000 going to PG & E
for 24th.

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce McMills/FtWorth/PEFS/PEC on
02/23/2000
11:34 AM ---------------------------

Daren.J.Farmer@enron.com on 02/23/2000 11:20:21 AM

To:   Bruce McMills/FtWorth/PEFS/PEC@PEC
cc:
Subject:  Re: Nomination - 2-23-2000

Bruce,

I need to hold the deliveries to 60,000 for 2/24.  I'm somewhat limited on
my transport right now.  I will look into the possibility of increasing the
volume, though.  If you can increase the deliveries at Fuels Cotton Valley,
that will work.

Daren

"Bruce McMills" <bmcmills@duke-energy.com> on 02/23/2000 09:11:07 AM

To:   dfarmer@enron.com, briley@enron.com, "Chad W. Cass"
      <CWCASS@duke-energy.com>, "Donna C. Spencer"
      <dcspencer@duke-energy.com>, "William E. Speckels"
      <WESPECKELS@duke-energy.com>
cc:   "Michael R. Cherry" <mrcherry@duke-energy.com>
Subject:  Nomination - 2-23-2000

I meant 2/24/2000 as the effective date of this nom.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce McMills/FtWorth/PEFS/PEC on
02/23/2000
09:09 AM ---------------------------

Bruce McMills
02/23/2000 08:55 AM

To:   dfarmer@enron.com, briley@enron.com, William E.
Speckels/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC,
      Chad W. Cass/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Donna C. Spencer/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC
cc:   Michael R. Cherry/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Darrel F.
      Bane/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC
Subject:  Nomination - 2-23-2000

Please incerease deliveries to Eastrans to 65,000 MMBtu/d eff 2/23/2000.

7,000 will come from Fuels Cotton Valley.
Maintain sale of 500 MMBtu/d.
Increase PG & E nom to 58,000 MMBtu/d.

The agreement provides for up to 60,000 MMBtu at our option.
Brian Riley needs to approve the increase to 65,000 MMBtu/d.


Please open the attached file to read the complete text of the following
items:

08:06AM EDT 10-OCT-00 C.E. UNTERBERG, TOWBIN (JAMES POYNER) DELL
DELL COMPUTER: RELATIVE VALUATION ON LOWER ESTIMATES STILL ATTRACTIVE

07:46AM EDT 10-OCT-00 PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES (H.MOSESMANN)
MICROPROCESSOR UPDATE - SUPPLY COULD OUTPACE DEMAND IN 4Q00/1Q01

12:42PM EDT  9-OCT-00 MORGAN STANLEY\DW (MUNSON, GILLIAN) AAPL
TECHNOLOGY: CQ3 EARNINGS PREVIEW

 <<10.10.00 Analyst Reports.doc>>

The analyst reports provided are reports prepared by independent analysts
who monitor and track Compaq's performance.  These reports are not prepared
by or at the direction of Compaq and as a result, Compaq is not endorsing or
verifying the information contained in these reports or endorsing any of
these analysts.   These reports are being provided solely for business
reasons and as a result, do not distribute these reports to other
individuals outside of Compaq.  If other individuals are interested in
receiving the reports provided herein, please contact Elizabeth Davis in
Compaq's Investor Relations Department at elizabeth.davis@compaq.com.

Elizabeth Davis
Compaq - Investor Relations
Research Analyst
281-518-4289

 - 10.10.00 Analyst Reports.doc


Kent and Dave, I reviewed our analysis of the swing for July 17th this morning in the meeting.  High level
	recap is:

		130,000		Due to building line pack from Monday's gas day
		 95,000		Day to Day payback and I/C shortages ( the bulk of this was to
					repay Norval and Valero Sprayberry about 60,000 from
					the previous day)

		140,000		Due to Market Area overtake (this includes 40,000 of Mid Am imbalance
					plus 100,000 spread over ABC, D and EF.  In looking at LSF, we
					were not able to determine that any one zone over pulled.  It looked
					to be pretty evenly distributed)

		 15,000		Due to 5% tolerance on Power packs.
		_______
		380,000		The total swing was 419,000.  The difference of 39,000 is a combination
					operational adjustments.

	Hopefully this helps to identify some of your concerns.  If you have any questions, please let me
	know.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Kent
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 2:56 PM
To:	Kowalke, Terry
Cc:	Neville, Sue; Williams, Jo; Blair, Lynn; Corman, Shelley; Branney, Theresa; Swett, Larry
Subject:	Re: Morning storage numbers

THanks Terry,

We still need to look into what the source of the huge daily unanticipated swing numbers for the past 3 days.  Is this related to some of our scheduling difficulties with BP Amoco into El Paso or is it spread across our LDC shippers in the Market Area?

Kent

From:	Terry Kowalke/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/19/2001 09:49 AM
To:	Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sue Neville/ENRON@enronXgate, Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ENRON@enronXgate, Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate, Theresa Branney/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Swett/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject:	Morning storage numbers

The storage numbers on the 8 am morning report were the correct numbers but the numbers being referenced to on (Sum Sheet Report) this morning had an error causing the unanticipated swing number be much larger than anticipated. It has been corrected and is now within 2 thousand of the 8 am report. The unanticipated swing number for the two previous days still stands as shown on the sum sheet report. If you have any further questions, feel free to give me a call at, 3-6403. Thank you.

Terry Kowalke


---------------------- Forwarded by Donna Greif/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2000 04:49
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dave Nommensen                           05/09/2000 12:13 PM

To: Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: new Unify Transaction/Volume Count reports

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2000
12:12 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dave Nommensen                           05/09/2000 08:24 AM

To: Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane H Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari
Mao/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Benedicta Tung/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: new Unify Transaction/Volume Count reports

These 2 new reports are now available in
Start/Programs/Trading/Unify (Gas-Reporting).  This password should be the
same as your Unify (Gas) password.

Go to Path Manager/Report/General Report Selection/Path Manager.

The two new reports are Monthly Transaction Counts and Monthly Volume Counts.

Enjoy, d.n.


Here is our info!!

Darren Adamik
3027 Fresco Well Drive
Katy, Texas 77449
713-853-4764 Office
281-646-1363  Home
713-302-1089  Cell
877-383-5376 Pager
darren@adamik.com <mailto:darren@adamik.com>

David Cummings
6026 Hummingbird
Houston, Texas 77096
713-853-0400 Office
713-723-8636 Home
281-541-7563 Cell
877-641-0778 Pager
dac1866@yahoo.com <mailto:dac1866@yahoo.com>

Ben Hill
5214 Briarbend Drive
Houston, Texas 77035
713-853-5142 Office
713-551-9040 Home
281-541-7566 Cell
713-406-0025 Pager
benhill2@yahoo.com <mailto:benhill2@yahoo.com>

Les Peebles
6206 Wade Road #162
Baytown, Texas 77521
713-853-1860 Office
281-424-0073 Home
281-541-7562 Cell
713-406-9163 Pager
lespj@ev1.net <mailto:lespj@ev1.net>


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
12:46 PM ---------------------------

Phillip M Love
11/30/2000 01:54 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jimmy Simien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Victor
Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
01:53 PM ---------------------------

Bruce Mills@ENRON
11/30/2000 11:24 AM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Mills/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000
11:22 AM ---------------------------

"Cantu, Veronica" <vcantu@bcm.tmc.edu> on 11/30/2000 11:05:54 AM
To: "'Adrian Cantu'" <acantu@hotmail.com>, "'Amy_Copes@Dell.com'"
<Amy_Copes@Dell.com>, "'Bruce.Mills@enron.com'" <Bruce.Mills@enron.com>,
"'elena morales'" <elena_morales@excite.com>, "'Francisco Sanchez'"
<hcdpsecretary@hotmail.com>, "'Gina.Kane@AACN.org'" <Gina.Kane@AACN.org>,
"'Kristine Best'" <kristinebest@hotmail.com>, "Liau, Katherine"
<Kliau@www.urol.bcm.tmc.edu>
cc:

Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonietz, Laurie
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:38 AM
To: 'ludmilla'; 'andrea'; Coleman, Angela; Cantu, Veronica; Riezner, Melanie
Subject: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i'm too dumb to figure this version out.  maybe it would help if i read the
rules.....

 - elves2.exe


Chantel  --

Please call me at 713-853-7673 to assist with any questions.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Migden, Janine
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 2:00 PM
To:	'"Chantel R. Ornstein" <cornstein@alexander-cleaver.com>@ENRON'; steve montovano; Hoatson, Tom; Bolton, Stacey; Janine Migden
Cc:	Gary Alexander; Chantel O. Freedman; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: MD Credit review

Chantel,

I forwarded your email on.  Today is my last day so you should probably follow up with Jim Steffes.
Thanks and take care.
Janine

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Chantel R. Ornstein" <cornstein@alexander-cleaver.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:29 PM
To:	steve montovano; Hoatson, Tom; Bolton, Stacey; Janine Migden
Cc:	Gary Alexander; Chantel O. Freedman
Subject:	MD Credit review

Group -

I received a call from Greg Carmean, MD PSC Exec.  Director, regarding review of Enron's credit status.  It is Greg's  understanding that the MD IOU's are planning to review Enron's creditworthiness  as an electricity and/or gas supplier.  In the event that the Commission  needs to take any expeditious action in this regard, we need to  know who to contact within your organization.  Please advise as soon  as possible how you would like us to handle this matter.
Thanks,
Chantel
 - Chantel R. Ornstein.vcf << File: Chantel R. Ornstein.vcf >>


Please be aware that the following internet domains for messaging will be
decommissioned on
OCTOBER 14, 2000 :

@ect.enron.com
@ei.enron.com
@enron.co.uk

After OCTOBER 14, 2000, internet emails addressed to employees using the
above internet domain names will be no longer be delivered.
Please note that this applies to Enron employees worldwide.

All employees must now use their @enron.com internet address.

Some employees are still receiving internet email, primarily subscriptions to
internet-based news/update services, addressed to their @ect.enron.com,
@ei.enron.com or @enron.co.uk email address.   As mails to these addresses
will no longer be delivered after OCTOBER 14, 2000 please contact the service
providers to specify your new @enron.com internet address.

Any employees who are aware of the following should contact the Resolution
Center on ext. 31411 immediately :
 Applications/processes using @ect.enron.com, @ei.enron.com or @enron.co.uk
internet addresses
 Distribution groups being addressed via the internet using @ect.enron.com,
e.g. Enron.London.Developers@ect.enron.com

Please direct any questions to the Resolution Center at ext. 31411.

Thanks for your cooperation.
Enron Messaging Administration


Many thanks.  Pardon my ignorance, but is there a list of riders to select
from? The transaction that we are contemplating is with a municipality, so we
need some muny language if such thing exists.

Thanks,

Kay


Discuss credit markets and new financing idea.  Some peoples schedules show
conflicts.  Will this time work?


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2000
02:45 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Maria Sandoval                           01/25/2000 01:32 PM

To: Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S
Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, patty.soria@mwk.com,
elizabeth.gutierrez@eott.com, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, amolina@unifirst.com, apena26@hotmail.com, Pamela
Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Barreda/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: So Very True...

This is sooooo very true.
---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000
01:32 PM ---------------------------

Judy Hernandez on 01/25/2000 01:25:08 PM
To: Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber
Limas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rose
Botello/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirlet Williams/HOU/ECT@EES
cc:
Subject: Fwd: So Very True...

---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000
01:22 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Michelle Neville                           01/25/2000 01:04 PM

To: Alicia Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paula Pierre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra
Moses/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT, amelia_hinton@valic.com,
danaa@corbettstaff.com, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra R
McNichols/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Ramirez/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Fwd: So Very True...

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Neville/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000
01:00 PM ---------------------------

Jessica Anaya
01/25/2000 08:47 AM
To: Leslie Linares/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Claudia Meraz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Etelvina
Guerra/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle Neville/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, sbellard@hotmail.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: So Very True...

---------------------- Forwarded by Jessica Anaya/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000 08:46
AM ---------------------------

Helen Martinez <helenmar1980@yahoo.com> on 01/24/2000 09:01:56 PM
To: Jessica Anaya/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Anaya <madaa@swbell.net>, Yanett Anaya
<Yanett2121@hotmail.com>, Keziah Apura <kweenpobby@aol.com>, Carmen Cantu
<ccantu_79@yahoo.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: So Very True...

Note: forwarded message attached.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

X-Apparently-To: helenmar1980@yahoo.com via mdd202.mail.yahoo.com
X-Track2: 2
X-Track: -50
Received: from law-f256.hotmail.com (HELO hotmail.com) (209.185.130.172)  by
mta121.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2000 23:26:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 33988 invoked by uid 0); 24 Jan 2000 23:26:43 -0000
Message-ID: <20000124232643.33987.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 152.163.197.74 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
 Mon, 24 Jan 2000
15:26:43 PST
X-Originating-IP: [152.163.197.74]
From: "Rios Belinda" <b_line78@hotmail.com>
To: lmsol@aol.com, mmederes@yahoo.com, bryan.snoddy@scott.af.mil,
neh21@alltel.net, shelbeekay@aol.com, arreliz@aol.com,  helenmar1980@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: So Very True...
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 15:26:43 PST
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Content-Length: 4268

>From: "Beverly Wehmeyer" <BWehmeyer@gpsolaw.com>
>To: <ALeon57383@aol.com>,<Lybw1@aol.com>,
><melly4260@aol.com>,<Jennifer.Diaz@cna.com>, <b_line78@hotmail.com>
>Subject: So Very True...
>Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 17:14:46 -0600
>
> >> Subject:     So very true. Everyone must read this. It's beautiful
> >>
> >> Happiness......
> >>
> >> We convince ourselves that life will be better after we get married,
>have
>
> >> a
> >> baby, then another. Then we're frustrated that the kids aren't old
>enough
>
> >> and we'll be more content when they are. After that, we're frustrated
>that
>
> >> we have teenagers to deal with. We'll certainly be happy when they're
>out
>
> >> of
> >> that stage.
> >>
> >> We tell ourselves that our life will be complete when our spouse gets
>his
>
> >> or
> >> her act together, when we get a nicer car, are able to go on a nice
> >> vacation,  when we retire.
> >>
> >> The truth is, there's no better time to be happy than right now. If not
> >> now,
> >> when?
> >>
> >> Your life will always be filled with challenges. It's best to admit
>this
>
> >> to
> >> yourself and decide to be happy anyway.
> >>
> >> One of my favorite quotes comes from Alfred D. Souza.  He said, "For a
> >> long
> >> time it had seemed to me that life was about to begin - real life. But
> >> there
> >> was
> >> always some obstacle in the way, something to be gotten through first,
> >> some
> >> unfinished business, time still to be served, or a debt to be paid.
> >>
> >>
> >> Then life would begin.  At last it dawned on me that these obstacles
>were
>
> >> my
> >> life."
> >>
> >> This perspective has helped me to see that there is no way to
>happiness.
>
> >> Happiness is the way.  So, treasure every moment that you have and
> >> treasure
> >> it more because you shared it with someone special, special enough to
> >> spend
> >> your time with...and remember that time waits for no one.
> >>
> >>
> >> So, stop waiting until you finish school, until you go back to school,
> >> until
> >> you lose ten pounds, until you gain ten pounds, until you have kids,
>until
>
> >> your kids leave the house, until you start work, until you retire,
>until
>
> >> you
> >> get married, until you get divorced, until Friday night, until Sunday
> >> morning, until you get a new car or home, until your car or home is
>paid
>
> >> off, until spring, until summer, until fall, until winter, until you're
> >> off
> >> welfare, until the first or fifteenth, until your song comes on, until
> >> you've had a drink, until you've sobered up, until you die, until
>you're
>
> >> born again to decide that there is no better time than right now to be
> >> happy.
> >>
> >> Happiness is a journey, not a destination.
> >>
> >> Thought for the day:
> >> Work like you don't need money,
> >> Love like you've never been hurt,
> >> And dance like no one's watching.
> >>
> >>
> >> An Angel To Watch over You
> >> Some people  come into our lives  and quickly go..
> >> Some people  become  friends  and stay a while.. leaving beautiful
> >> footprints on our  hearts and we are never quite the same because we
>have
>
> >> made a good friend!!
> >>
> >>
> >> Yesterday is history.
> >> Tomorrow a mystery.
> >> Today is a gift.
> >> That's why it's called the present!
> >>
> >> I think this is special.....
> >> live and savor every moment.....
> >> this is not a dress rehearsal!
> >>
> >>
> >>   (\           /)
> >>   ( \  __  / )
> >>    ( \ (  ) / )
> >>    (( /<>\ ))           TAKE THIS LITTLE ANGEL
> >>    ( / \/\/  \ )           AND KEEP HER CLOSE TO
> >>      (       )             YOU SHE IS YOUR GUARDIAN
> >>      (       )             ANGEL SENT TO WATCH
> >>      (       )             OVER YOU~~~~~~
> >>
> >>
> >> THIS IS A SPECIAL GUARDIAN ANGEL... YOU MUST PASS THIS ON TO 5 PEOPLE
> >> WITHIN
> >> THE HOUR OF RECEIVING HER..AFTER YOU DO MAKE A WISH....IF YOU HAVE
>PASSED
>
> >> HER ON, YOUR WISH WILL BE  GRANTED AND SHE'LL WATCH OVER YOU
>FOREVER....IF
>
> >> NOT..HER TEARS  WILL FLOW AND NO WISHES WILL BE GRANTED....
> >>
> >> Now don't delete this message,because it comes from a very special
>angel.
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


Cash
 Hehub
 Chicago
 PEPL
 Katy
 Socal
 Opal
 Permian

Gas Daily

 Hehub
 Chicago
 PEPL
 Katy
 Socal
 NWPL
 Permian

Prompt

 Nymex
 Chicago
 PEPL
 HSC
 Socal
 NWPL


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042406.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred: 103.69 / Final: 103.14)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Steve asked that I forward this to you.

CONFIDENTIAL - talking points for Lay's conversation with Glynn.


Slow browser may need to wait 15 seconds for your email to appear, then scroll to view. mailto:leave-enerfaxdaily-800391E@relay.netatlantic.com to unsubscribe enerfaxdaily as: rod.hayslett@enron.com forward to web@enerfax.com
If your email does not support this web version, please subscribe to the free text version by writing subscribe@enerfax.com <mailto:subscribe@enerfax.com> Please visit our website to view today's gas and power prices and news by clicking <http://www.enerfax.com>

If you received this in error or no longer wish to subscribe click this link mailto:leave-enerfaxdaily-800391E@relay.netatlantic.com or forward to web@enerfax.com


Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Robert Bruce/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 12:37 PM -----

	Robert Bruce
	Sent by: Robert Bruce
	12/11/2000 12:20 PM

		 To: Clement Abrams/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT; mvonbock@enron.com
		 Subject: TD prepay guarantees

Clement, as we discussed this morning, Credit Suisse First Boston
International (CSFBI) and Morgan Stanley Capital Group are requesting
unlimited guarantees of ENA's obligations under the prepay swaps.  We already
have an unlimited guaranty in place for the benefit of Toronto Dominion
(issued in connection with the 1998 master); word from London is that we are
arguing with them as to whether we have to provide a stand-alone unlimited
guaranty specific to this transaction.

In any event, we will have to execute at least two new unlimited guaranties
on behalf of Enron Corp. (assuming Ben Glisan approves).  Enclosed is a draft
that I propose using as a template, red-lined to show revisions from our
standard form of financial trading guaranty:

By copy to Sara and Marcus, I ask them to provide any comments to this draft
that they feel appropriate.  I would like to get your approval before I send
clean drafts based on this form to the counterparties.  Thanks -- Bob

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000
02:05 PM ---------------------------

<Jeffrey.W.Dellapina@chase.com> on 09/28/2000 01:41:04 PM
To: Catherine.Clark@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: swap details on Alberta prepay

I'm not available at that time.  Pls amend your sample confirm after the call
and send by email.

Catherine.Clark@enron.com on 09/28/2000 02:41:37 PM

To:   Jonathan.McKay@enron.com, John.Griffith@enron.com,
TIM.HIRASAWA@RBCDS.COM,
      blair.fleming@royalbank.com, hulla@tdsecurities.com, Jeffrey W.
      Dellapina/CHASE@CHASE
cc:   Soma.Ghosh@enron.com, Brian.Kerrigan@enron.com
Subject:  swap details on Alberta prepay

There seems to be some confusion surrounding the details of the various
swaps.  Please bring any outstanding issues to the following conference
call at 2:30 pm Houston time.  Call in numbers:
1-805-240-9483 in Canada
access code in Canada 139196

1-888-232-0370 in the US
access code in the US 135737

Please call Megan Angelos at (713) 853-0420 if you have any trouble
accessing the call.  Thanks,
-Catherine
(713) 853-9943


---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/27/99
08:08 AM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
12/23/99 12:11 PM

To: Karen Bobb/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Joanne
Swogger/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Nancy Diel/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: REVISED - January 2000 Tennessee deliveries to WKY

Please note in red the revised volumes
---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/23/99
01:10 PM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
12/23/99 11:05 AM

To: Karen Bobb/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel
Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Joanne Swogger/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Nancy
Diel/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: January 2000 Tennessee deliveries to WKY

Per the sales reps and GMS I will need the following:

100 dth per day to meter # 020030
596 dth per day to meter # 020028

I will receive a final number for these next week but this is an estimate.
(should not be that far off).


Hi Jeff-
Hope things are well with you.  Classes started here this week and I'm
still getting my schedule straigtened out.  Fortunately, I got into the
Speculative Markets course.  However, I still need to choose a second
finance class.

I have until friday at 3 PM EST to choose between FIXED INCOME (dealing
primarily with bond replication, fairly quantitative) and FUNDING
INVESTMENTS (a broad examination of how firms finance investment with
corporate securities).

Which of the two do you think would help me out the most at Enron Global
Markets?  Sorry for the short notice, but I just won the course permit
tonight!

Thanks,
Matthew
(267) 254-8985


The following reports on Andy Cornfield's meetings in NY and Chicago and one
with Craig Young have been posted in S\Mg\Administration\Meeting Reports\

MG NY - MGL Inc
MG NY - Primary Metals Agency Business
MG NY - 2ndary Al Business (Chicago)
MG Funds Business


Mark - Louise Kitchen put your name down as the sponsor for all EA IT legal projects.  All EA IT projects were reviewed & approved Tues. & Wed. by the sponsors except the 2 that had your name by them.   Cornelio and I tried to catch you Tues. & Wed. via phone calls & emails to review them with you, but with no luck. Louise is reviewing the final EA IT budget today.

I apologize for you being put into the middle of all this by Louise, but I wanted to give you all the information that I could about the projects before Louise reviews them today.  Thanks for your help.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Greenberg, Mark
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:50 PM
To:	Wong, Joe
Cc:	Haedicke, Mark E.; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Sager, Elizabeth; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Murray, Julia; Tweed, Sheila; Schuler, Lance (Legal)
Subject:	RE: 2002 IT Budgets

Joe -

Thanks for the information.  As I told Cornelio in relation to the EWS - Legal Project, I am currently only responsible for the LegalOnline project and work on this under the authority of Mark Haedicke.  As to the other projects, why and how may name became associated with them is both interesting and incorrect as I am not the "sponsor" of any of them.

Last week I received the first indication of the need to discuss these projects in line with ENW's budget approval for ENA projects.  Since a conference call was scheduled for earlier today to discuss these items, I figured I would gather more information and forward that information to the appropriate member of the Dept. for review, consideration and action.  I was advised yesterday that the budget was approved and there was no need for today's conference call.  Despite this budget approval (without EWS Legal discussion), ENW personnel have continued to request that I "approve" these projects for next year - even if the approval is only as a "placeholder" for the budget.  I cannot do this and, quite frankly, see no value in obtaining these "approvals" if the budget has been approved.

If those responsible for these other projects would like me to follow-up with you on these matters and authorize me to do so, I would be more than happy to do so.  Sheila Tweed has actually asked me to do this on the "extranet" project, which I will be reviewing with Ed Hearn.  Once we (Ed and I) have reviewed the feasibility study proposed by Cornelio, we will determine the next steps to be taken and whether or not this project should move forward.  I will advise you accordingly.

Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wong, Joe
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 12:40 PM
To:	Greenberg, Mark
Subject:	2002 IT Budgets

Mark - these are the answers to your questions concerning our budgets.  Please let me know if this is OK with you.  I would be happy to discuss in person or via a phone call.  Let me know what's best for you.

Your name appearing on 2 projects for ENA?
1)  "EWS - Legal" project. -  Cornelio spoke with you last night and confirmed 1 project actually belongs to Sheila Tweed.  So we will get her to approve.

2)  "Legal Web Maint."  - this is really 3 projects, which are:
Legal Web - Enhancements/maintenance for 2001 project converting "ECT Legal Foreign & Domestic", "Jurisdiction Document Library", and "European Document Libarary" Notes applications to intranet apps.  Sponsored by Mark Greenberg.
Physical and Financial Trading, Power Trading, Gas Assets and Industrial Markets Trading Agreements intranet site.  Replaces and expands 3 Master Agreements Notes applications.  Sponsored by Marc Taylor, Elizabeth Sager, Jeff Hodge, Julia Murray.
ENA Legal Support application. Sponsored by W.L. Schuler
Can you informally approve these 3 projects?

Is this formal commitment to the projects?
No.  This is only a placeholder in the budget for these projects, not formal approval.  You would formally approve the projects once we were ready to start working on them next year.  So, you can agree to put a placeholder in the budget for the project, but cancel it next year before we begin actually working on it.


In response to the tragic events of September 11th and due to popular demand, eSource is offering a valuable Country Risk Analysis for those monitoring global implications and risk due to recent developments in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India.

This report, prepared by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) and available through eSource at no charge, contains the following information:

?          Political Background
?          Country Infrastructure
?          Economic Policy and Sectors
?          Trade

To request a copy of this report logon to http://esource.enron.com/RequestSearch.asp <http://esource.enron.com/RequestSearch.asp>

Submit your request online by entering applicable employee data in the required fields and referencing "EIU Pakistan/Afghanistan" or "EIU India" in the "Describe Request" box.

eSource continues to provide additional country risk and analysis information from a variety of reputable sources including CountryWatch.com and World Markets Country Analysis & Forecast, which can be accessed at http://esource.enron.com/ <http://esource.enron.com/>  Select "The World" from the right tool bar and then "Country Reports."

If you are not interested in receiving these messages in the future, please let us know, and we will kindly adjust our mailing list.


Thanks!

Would you be interested in some pecans?  This guy Anne works with has an orchard and he is selling them in 10lb bags at $1.80/lb.  They are not cracked or shelled.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rossi, Robbi
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:40 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:

Marie,

  Rober Allen just called me and approved my account.  I'll confirm pricing and send in your order by tomorrow.


The copy is on its way via my runner.

---------------------- Forwarded by Iris Waser/HOU/EES on 02/27/2001 04:23 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Mike D Smith                           02/27/2001 04:17 PM

To: Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EES Master

please handle
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike D Smith/HOU/EES on 02/27/2001 04:17
PM ---------------------------
From: Gerald Nemec@ECT on 02/27/2001 04:16 PM
To: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: EES Master

Mike,  I never did receive a executed copy of the Master and Transaction
Agreement between EES and Enron Compression Services Company.  Do you have a
copy and could you send it to me?


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/17/2000 05:00
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           07/13/2000 06:25 PM

To: Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fred
Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Thomas Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: ABB turbines/site marketing agreement

Lisa Bills and I spoke concerning this transaction, and what kind of document
we can put in front of Peoples at this time.  Here are the highlights from
our conversation:

Enron can't enter into a binding commitment to purchase the equipment without
putting the Moore project on the balance sheet.  Therefore, either WestLB
needs to enter into the agreement with Peoples or Enron can enter into an
option agreement.  There is room in the WestLB facility for the turbines;
however, RAC needs to approve the purchase.  Lisa advises that Transaction
Support (Herman or Roger) needs to buy in as well.

I understand we would like to present a binding agreement to Peoples
tomorrow, however, this appears to be problematic given the need to keep the
Moore project off the balance sheet.

I'm available to discuss this.  Lisa advises that she will be in tomorrow as
well.

Lisa, please correct me if any of this is not accurate.

Kay


Here are our picks for the incoming class.

Gas

Analysts:

Gabrial Chavez
Nate Blackburn
Phillip Berry (Maybe for Sally Beck or Beth Perlman)
Sachin Gandhi
Miguel Nasser
James Wininger

Associates

Dustin Collins
Vikas Dwivedi
Li Sun

Power

Analysts:

Elizabeth Johnston
Possey Martinez
Gary Justice

Associates:

Doug Seaworth
Dustin Collins
Eduardo Gil
Pearce Hammond
David Maskel
Michael Kelly

Please confirm how many of these we can lock up.

Lavo


Have fun. Please tell me it is some place exotic---like Long Beach?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"John Quinn" <jbq@quinnemanuel.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22John+20Quinn+22+20+3Cjbq+40quinnemanuel+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Saturday, June 16, 2001 1:17 PM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	vacation

i leave on vacation for 2 weeks this Sunday.  i stay in close touch with the office and can fed exp every day--if you call, i'll get back to you.  shon morgan will be doing a first draft of our reply brief in the ninth circuit.


PennFuture's E-cubed is a commentary biweekly email publication concerning the current themes and trends in the energy market. If you have trouble reading this email, please see the document on our website (www.pennfuture.org) under Pressroom & Publications.
--------------------------------------

August 24, 2001
Vol. 3, No. 16

A Cool Heat Wave

From August 6 to August 10, record peak electricity demand driven by a sweltering heat wave severely tested the reliability of the competitive PJM market. The PJM market passed its stress test with little public notice or credit. As usual, only ships that sink or planes that crash draw headlines.

With air-conditioners battling near 100-degree temperatures, consumers set three new peak usage records on August 7, 8, and 9, with demand hitting 53, 464 megawatts (MW), 53,910 MW, and 54,176 MW respectively. These new records smashed the old peak of approximately 51,700 MW set in a 1999, and contributed to unhealthy air in large parts of the Mid-Atlantic region. They also highlight the need to enact better demand response programs and energy efficiency policies in order to reduce the strain placed on power supplies as well as to protect the environment and public health.

The ability of the PJM competitive market to meet record demands and keep consumers cool sharply contrast with California's inability to keep the lights on even in periods of low-seasonal usage from late 2000 through March of this year. Speaking of PJM's impressive reliability performance, PJM President Phil Harris concluded, "This week's accomplishment is testimony to how effective markets and efficient operations work in harmony to reliably serve the electric customer." But keeping the lights on should never be taken for granted.

Prior to restructuring, in January 1994, rolling blackouts occurred throughout the PJM power pool when demand for about 45,000 MW couldn't be met. These blackouts occurred primarily because huge numbers of plants, which were rate based and operated by fully regulated monopolies or non-utility generators with PURPA contracts, experienced mechanical and fuel problems at the same time.

This painful experience ensured that policymakers made reliability a top priority and a major topic of discussion when enacting the state's Electricity Competition and Customer Choice Act in 1996, asking questions like, would a competitive market attract sufficient investment to build necessary plants? Would existing plants perform better or worse and experience less or more outages? Could consumers be paid market prices to reduce demand at peak usage times in order to increase incentives for energy conservation?

The last five years and meeting record peaks both in 1999 and 2001 answer those questions and prove the reliability of the competitive PJM market. The market is producing lots of new generation - most of it new natural gas plants and some wind power, and all of it much cleaner than the coal and nuclear plants which dominated the generation market more than 10 years ago. Plants in PJM have never operated better and have reduced their forced outage rate by about 50 percent since 1996. Additionally, a few customers participated in PJM's emerging demand response programs during the August 2001 heat wave.

But many more customers would reduce usage in peak periods in return for market-based compensation if they only had the ability. Though demand response has its nose under the generation tent, it still hasn't reached most Pennsylvanians. Neither Pennsylvania nor any other state has taken policy steps to ensure that a necessary infrastructure of time-of-use meters and appliance control devices is deployed throughout every home and business, a failure which amounts to regulatory malpractice. Until the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission requires the deployment of these available technologies over a reasonable period, prices for electricity will remain higher than they need be, pollution will be worse than it should be, and reliability will be less than it could be.

Keeping the lights on
During the recent heat wave, PJM encouraged general restraint in usage, implemented its demand response programs, and reduced voltage by 2 percent to 3 percent for brief periods - undetectable to most customers. Beyond not failing, the system performed so well in large part because of the competitive market, not despite it. Several factors worked to maintain system reliability, including better power plant performance, new generation, imports, skillful management of the operation of the transmission system and demand response.

Improved Generation Plant Operation. Of all these factors, dramatically better plant performance is the single, biggest key to competitive PJM's impressive reliability performance during the last five years. Generating plants are operating much more reliably now than during the monopoly era. In 1996, the forced outage rate at PJM generation plants was 12.7 percent, meaning that a plant scheduled to be available was in fact unavailable for operational reasons 12.7 percent of the time. The forced outage rate of generating facilities in PJM declined to 11.2 percent in 1997, 6.5 percent in 1998, 5.7 percent in 1999 and to 5.2 percent in 2000. In 1996, when you really needed a generator, there was a 1-in-8 chance that the unit wouldn't be available. But in 2000, the odds that a generator would be forced out of service at any particular time had fallen to 1 in 20.

Under price regulation, generators for the most part got paid even if their plants were unavailable to generate electricity because of operational or maintenance problems. With the move to market-based prices, generators have a built-in incentive to be there, especially when demand and prices are high. Even the PJM capacity payment - still a relic of rate-based generation - has moved from a payment simply because a plant was physically built, to one based upon the generating unit's historical availability to provide generation when needed. The decline in unforced outage rates is a testament to the change in how generators get paid. At the 5.2 percent 2000 average forced outage rate, about 3,000 MW would have been unavailable - at the 12.7 percent average forced outage rate for 1996, more than 7,300 MW would have been unavailable. Every generation owner deserves credit for this superb performance.

New Generation. Another reason the lights are staying on despite record peaks is the new generation built to serve the Mid-Atlantic market. The development of competitive power plants continues to accelerate in PJM, with over 4,000 MW scheduled to come on-line in 2002, and even more for 2003. In contrast, demand in 2002 is expected to grow by less than 1,000 MW.

The Mid-Atlantic experience documents that new generation can be supplied in a competitive market. The market is delivering plenty of new generation that is dramatically cleaner and more efficient than that built during the monopoly era. Transparent prices in a competitive, efficient market are encouraging investors to build. Unlike the previous generations of power plants, no captive monopoly consumer had to guarantee any investor in a new generation plant a single penny return of the investment or a single penny return on the investment. Unlike many of the previous generation of power plants, these new plants use mostly natural gas instead of coal or nuclear fuel, cost billions less to build, can be planned and built more quickly, and don't pollute nearly as much. And these plants will never receive a penny in stranded costs.

Imports. The PJM transparent competitive market sends price signals to generators in its territory - to encourage them to build new supply and to keep their plants in service and available, especially at peak demand - as well as to national electricity markets, especially in the Midwest and Virginia. Peak demand and relatively high peak prices in PJM enabled PJM to benefit from surplus supplies in adjacent regions and import significant amounts of electricity - often over 3,000 MW of net imports - when it was needed most.

PJM Operations. Properly managing the electric grid isn't an easy task on a typical day, but during a heat wave it's particularly challenging. In August, PJM showed exceptional restraint and skill in managing a potential crisis without overreacting, relying on the market and voluntary reductions while avoiding the more intrusive controls at their disposal. The 2 percent to 3 percent reduced voltage levels for a few hours were the only non-voluntary reductions, measures imperceptible to most consumers.

Demand Response. PJM called upon industrial customers to curtail usage through traditional interruptible service in which large customers receive a discounted rate in exchange for having service interrupted when supply is limited, and requested that all customers, especially large industrial customers, voluntarily limit consumption and turn on on-site generation. PJM also successfully utilized several new, market based curtailment programs, and estimates that approximately 2000 MW of peak load was avoided through incentive programs and implementation of its pilot demand-side response program. There was an increase of nearly 400 MW of Active Load Management (ALM), which accounted for a good portion of the demand response programs instituted by PJM. Unlike the previous year, ALM was not excluded from participating in the PJM demand response programs. Additionally, about 100MW of non-ALM resources have enrolled in PJM's emergency and economic programs. While this represents a humble start, the effects during the peak hours can still be significant.

Prices. Peak demand produces peak prices in a competitive market, but PJM market prices remained well under control because new development, imports and plants in service provided adequate supply, and because PJM has a market rule limiting bids to $1,000 per MWh. Average peak hour prices (7 a.m. to 11 p.m.) at the PJM western hub were about $250 MWh. In many hours, prices remained less than $100 MWh, while during a few hours prices were constrained by the $1,000 rate cap. These peak prices are quite moderate compared to the extreme volatility that was seen in the Midwest in 1999, with prices rising to several thousand dollars per MWh, or the recent price spikes in California.

Indeed, one-year forward contract prices within PJM have collapsed since June, and the August heat wave hasn't reversed the sharp declines. An all-hours 2002 PJM contract now can be had for about $29.00 per MWh. June, July, and August 2002 contracts have fallen 50 percent from summer 2001 prices.

These forward prices are now reflecting the PJM spot market prices that fell in 2000 compared to 1999, and have hovered around $30.00 per MWh for the last 24 months. Both the PJM spot price and the forward contract price are up to 50 percent less than what most Pennsylvania customers paid their monopolies for generation in 1996. If they were paying only competitive prices, instead of competitive prices plus stranded costs - primarily for nuclear plants - every Pennsylvania customer would have a huge rate cut.

And the award goes to.
Congratulations to PJM and its staff for operating the PJM market reliably and competitively in the most difficult, challenging circumstances it has faced so far. Their service to the public is unfortunately not widely recognized and is taken for granted. Thanks as well to the plant operators who have never operated their plants better and to those fortunate consumers who had the ability to participate in demand response programs and reduced their usage for compensation.

Public safety, economic competitiveness, consumer savings, and environmental protection demand that all consumers, not a fortunate few, have the chance to save real money by reducing energy usage through demand response technologies.
-----------------------------
E-cubed is available for reprint in newspapers and other publications. Authors are available for print or broadcast.

PennFuture (www.pennfuture.org), with offices in Harrisburg, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, is a statewide public interest membership organization, which advances policies to protect and improve the state's environment and economy. PennFuture's activities include litigating cases before regulatory bodies and in local, state and federal courts, advocating and advancing legislative action on a state and federal level, public education and assisting citizens in public advocacy.

To unsubscribe, simply reply to this email with "unsubscribe" in the subject.


I have rolled deal 506192 thru 1/1/01, priced at Dec HSC Index -.045.

D

Aimee Lannou   01/10/2001 09:23 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter 1517

Daren - After checking with MIPS, you are correct.  Jan. 1 only flowed 19
dth.  The 5882 dth was a bad estimate.  A better estimate was received on
1/7/00.
Sorry about all the confusion.

AL

---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 09:14
AM ---------------------------
Aimee Lannou   01/10/2001 09:00 AM

To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter 1517

Gary - We did not deliver gas to Phillips on Dec. 1.  Also, I am not sure if
the plant was down, but we did not deliver to them on Dec. 2-4.  If you have
any questions, please let me know.

Aimee

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary W Lamphier                           01/10/2001 08:55 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter 1517

Phillips said we shorted them gas on December 1st so they pulled it on
January 1.  Can we verify that we did not deliver 5,00 on Dec. 1?  If that is
the case and this was a firm sale, we owe him some gas at Dec Index less
(.045).  Which is bad!  Let me know what happened in Dec before I can put
this deal out in Jan.

Daren J Farmer
01/09/2001 02:25 PM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meter 1517

Gary,

Have you negotiated a price on this?

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001
02:25 PM ---------------------------
Aimee Lannou   01/02/2001 02:14 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meter 1517

Daren - meter 1517 has a nom of 0/day for Jan.  It flowed about 5.400 on day
1. This is a valid flow.  Could you please extend the deal from Dec. (deal #
506192) or create a new one?  Thanks.

AL


As the Global Technology group moves forward in accomplishing its goals of
developing worldwide technology standards, eCommerce opportunities and global
platforms, we continue to make changes in the organization to enhance
communication and maximize our intellectual capital.  With that in mind, we
are pleased to announce the following organization changes within Global
Technology:

Jay Fitzgerald, MD eCommerce, will be moving to Enron North America and will
have responsibility for all of ENA,s eCommerce initiatives.  Although this
will be a big loss for Global Technology, Jay will provide immediate benefits
to the explosion of eBusiness opportunities that are developing in the ENA
lines of business.  Jay will report to Greg Whalley.

Steve Horn, VP Investments, will be moving into Global Technology to head the
eCommerce Ventures group responsible for eCommerce merchant investing.  The
scope of this new group will include investing in the following areas:
Strategic sourcing/procurement/demand aggregation/asset disposition businesses
eCommerce enabling technologies
Global eCommerce opportunities outside of EBS/ENA/EE.   EBS, EE and ENA will
be evaluating and making equity investments within their specific business
units.
Examining Houston technology business opportunities not directly related to
Enron,s business.
Steve will report directly to me in his new role.

Jenny Rub has accepted the newly formed position of VP of Infrastructure for
Enron Corp.  Her responsibilities include managing all IT infrastructure
support activities.  Jenny will report to Philippe Bibi.  Jenny is currently
VP and CIO for the Gas Pipeline Group and she will be transitioning out of
that role as she completes several important initiatives.

Beth Perlman has recently relocated to the United States as VP of ENA,s
application development, RAC and Treasury applications.  She was previously
heading up application development for Enron Europe.  She will report to
Philippe Bibi.

Dan Bruce, VP, is responsible for IT support in the international regions,
EE&CC and Asset Operations.  He will report to Philippe Bibi.

John Pavetto, VP, will be responsible for all eCommerce initiatives outside
of EnronOnline.  John will report to Philippe Bibi.

Jay Webb, Sr. Director, will continue to lead the Enron Online Team reporting
to Philippe Bibi.

Arshak Sarkissian, Sr. Director, has accepted a position with EBS,s strategic
development group and will be transitioning his responsibilities over the
course of the next few weeks.  He will report to Scott Yeager.

Please join me in congratulating everyone on their new positions.


so is kori in today

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 8:49 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

good.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 8:48 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

actually she wasnt mad at all

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 8:46 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i was sick all weekend.  i didn't get out of bed until 7pm on saturday.  i watched a movie and went back to bed at 9.  yesterday i finally got out of bed at 1 and we went and looked at cars and stopped by the lovely outlaws.  so mine was boring.  how were things friday when you got home?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 8:44 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

it was ok, i didnt really do anything, how about you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 8:43 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

it's ok.  i guess.  everything is backwards and i can't get used to it.  i was up there earlier.  i didn't see where you guys are sitting.  how was your weekend?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 8:41 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

terrible, yours?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 8:40 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

yes, why wouldn't we be?  how is your new desk?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 8:39 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

so are we still talking


As Steve Cooper has mentioned in his voicemail messages, there will be an All-Employee Meeting this Thursday, April 11.  The meeting will be held at 8:30 a.m. (CST) in the Imperial Ballroom of the Hyatt Regency Hotel.  Unfortunately, the full ballroom was not available until late May, but we did not want to put off the meeting until then.
Capacity at the Hyatt will be limited to 1,400 people seated, with additional room for approximately 200 people standing.  As an alternative to attending the meeting, employees in Houston will be able to listen to a live audio stream and view the slide presentation on their computers at http://home.enron.com/employeemeeting/.  The question and answer portion of the meeting will not be broadcasted.  Shortly after the meeting, the audio broadcast and the slide presentation will be available for all employees at home.enron.com.
Given the current environment and continuing media interest surrounding Enron, we will take extra security precautions at the Hyatt.  Employees attending the meeting will be required to show their current photo employee badge and each badge will be crosschecked with a current employee list.  No one will be permitted into the meeting without their badge.  Due to space constraints, contract workers will not be permitted to attend the meeting.  We recognize that this security process will take time, so check-in will begin at 7:45 a.m. We apologize for any inconvenience this process creates and appreciate your understanding and patience.
We encourage you to submit questions for the meeting in advance.  Please send them via email to "Office of the Chief Executive".


To Jae- Moo,
1. Impressive P'point presentation indeed.

2. Friday Sep 1 - 800am TYO time is good for Australia, I will be attending
is there anything that i need to arrange at our end ??

3. After the successful roll-out of W for Japan & Oz thus qtr,
as discussed - we are ready to roll-out Korean W say in Mid October ???
Your email & presenatation thus arrived at a very good time.

4. Just some questions -
You may answer in the conference call or by email -- your choice

(a) why has W derivatives been singled out by FSC for potential review
when there is no regulation of eg LPG , or plastics swaps & fwds  ?  (pg 11
of presentation)

(b) How necessary are the meetings with ( pg 5 of presentation)
".. Bank of Korea (BOK)/ Ministry of Finance & Economy (MOFE) for
classification of weather derivatives as commodity derivatives.." ?
Is this meeting to meet
"...except for Foreign Exchange Transaction Regulations (FETR) in case of
foreign currency trades
? Classification of weather derivatives as commodity or financial derivatives
under FETR needs to be resolved..."(pg 15 of presentation)

Can we just do it first with Enron Korea as the counterparty ? If so , if
Korean coy transacts with Enron Korea,
there should be no problem in remitting funds wholly within Korea !
Also we intend to offer product in Won only so no FX involved at all .

(c)
pg 18 of presentation
'...All other EnronOnline products with the exception of bandwidth and
emission allowances are classified as commodity derivatives in Korea..."
Why is it bandwidth and emission are classified differently?
Will not Weather fall under same category ?

"...Commodity derivatives require a prior reporting to the Bank of Korea for
each trade .."
Is this only relevant if product is not in Won but foreign currency ?

5. pg 28 of presentation
Note that Dr Christian Werner - Sydney office will be the person for
"Data system   For weather derivative products, arrange with a weather
forecasting company for the weather data feed - timing depends on the
location"

We will be able to assist with (if reqd, see points 4b & c above)
"...  For weather derivatives, arrange presentation meetings with BOK/MOFE
for classification of weather derivatives as commodity derivatives
_ May require longer time for their decision making
Korea Office, Mike Dahlke, EOL Weather specialist (?)"

Best wishes
Raymond

Matthias Lee@ECT
08/24/2000 09:22 PM
To: Jae-Moo Lee/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Christopher B Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Joseph P
Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Brown/ENRON@Gateway@ENRON, Justin
Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Raymond
Yeow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rousseau Anai/AP/Enron@Enron, John
Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT, Victor Santos/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON,
Li Yin Lim/SIN/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Jonathan
Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron, Michelle Lee/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann
Brown/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT,
Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: EOL Korea

Jae-Moo

On the section of Regulatory/Legal Environment, it may be useful to note:

1. There is no official rule or regulation that ex post facto reporting for
Commodity Derivatives are acceptable to the Bank of Korea, although your and
Korean external lawyer's (Kim & Chang) informal verbal enquiries with the
Bank of Korea have suggested they have accepted some  7 or 8 reports since
April last year (all from Hyundai Oil).

2. The Bank of Korea take up to two weeks to review the reports and, as Kim &
Chang has advised, there remains a possibility that the Bank of Korea may
reject the report, although they were not able to advise the grounds on which
a report may be rejected.

3. Although, a foreign counterparty need not file a report or seek approval,
the Korean counterparty must still do so for the benefit and interest of the
foreign counterparty. Kim & Chang advised that where reporting or approval is
required but is not made or obtained, the Korean counterparty would not be
able to remit its payments under the transaction. This would clearly impact
on the settlement of the transaction, in particular shorter term deals since
reporting and approval may take several weeks.

4. The Supreme Court of Korea has ruled that a foreign exchange authorization
that was originally required should be obtained in order for a foreign party
to execute any judgment against the Korean party and remit the proceeds.

Regards
Matt

Jae-Moo Lee@ENRON
08/24/2000 04:58 PM
To: Christopher B Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joseph P
Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike Brown/ENRON@Gateway, Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Raymond
Yeow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Rousseau Anai/AP/Enron@Enron, John Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT, Victor
Santos/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Li Yin Lim/SIN/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron
cc: Michelle Lee/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann
Brown/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: EOL Korea

As many of you are aware, over the past few months we have been investigating
whether or not it would make sense to seriously consider an EOL launch in
Korea from a market, regulatory and legal perspective.  The primary interest
has been on reviewing whether or not we could launch existing products in
Korea (e.g., products already handled by Singapore EOL) as well as new
products (e.g., Seoul weather).

This initial work was directed primarily by the Korea team working within the
APACHI group.  If a launch is to progress much further from this point,
however, substantial attention by the EOL team would be required.  To
facilitate this, the attached presentation summarizes our primary findings to
date and some of our thoughts.  We would appreciate your taking a look at the
attached document.

We would like to arrange a conference call for next Thursday (Aug. 31st) at
6:00 pm by Houston time (Friday at 8:00 am by Tokyo time) to discuss the
attached document and to solicit thoughts as to next steps.  Please let me
know whether you will be able to join this call or, if you have a conflict,
an alternative time.  Your participation will be greatly appreciated.

Best regards,

Jae-Moo


Klein High School Bearkadettes
        2000 Golf Tournament

Tournament Location:
Raveneaux Country Club
9415 Cypresswood Drive
Spring, Texas  77379
(281) 370-6370

General Information:
Date:   Monday, October 16, 2000
Registration: 12:00 Noon
Start time:  1:00 PM
Format:  Florida Scramble, Shotgun Start
Mulligans:  Four per player (2 per nine) $5.00 each prior to start
Lunch:  Sandwiches and soft drinks:  12:00 noon - 1:00 PM
Dinner:  Fajita Dinner/Live Auction/Silent Auction
Prizes:  Gross & Net Prizes
   Hole-in-One-Contest - possible car to be given away

Awesome Foursome sponsorship includes:
Hole Sponsorship Sign
Green Fees for Four Players
Range Balls for Four Players
Recognition in Program
2 Golf Carts
4 Lunches
4 Dinners

If you need any additional information, please call Patti at x39106.


This is the GG (jet) for Unit 2 on Red Rock

also - look at the range and fuel rate at turndown

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Minotti, Marcello
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:42 AM
To:	Rance, Byron; Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Diemont, Frank R.
Subject:	EngineTest.xls

Here is a table of results.  She's a gooden......

PS: I got the mass flow too so your emissions guy can check to make sure you are OK.


Is that desk doing options (NOT SWAPTIONS!)?  Why are you asking?  There are
many issues on the paper desk regarding options.  Sara

Lucy Ortiz
07/08/99 11:03 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Omnibus Option Template for Paper Deals

Hey Sara,

Would you please look over this omnibus option template that I took from TAGG
and modify it as you see fit for the Paper World?

Many thanks,

Lucy

P.S.
This particular deal is for a paper DRAFT, but I thought  we should have the
template in place anyway.  For future deals of course.


Attached is a revised agenda for the offsite meeting.  Please note that the dinner and the meeting the next day will be held in the Lakeside Room.  Attire for the offsite is business casual.  Please call if you have any questions.

Lakeside Room Contact Numbers
Tel:  281-297-5101 or 5102
Fax:  281-297-5103

Thanks,
Joannie
3-1769


---------------------- Forwarded by Savita Puthigai/NA/Enron on 01/17/2001
10:35 AM ---------------------------
From: Justin Rostant@ECT on 01/08/2001 02:57 PM
To: Lorie Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Savita Puthigai/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Compressed Training Manual

Attached is the training manual that I put together for one of my training
sessions. It is basically a compressed version of the Trader and Originator
User Manual with the addition of Price Limit Orders.
If you have any questions call me at 3-6460


Steve please add Louise to your distribution list.

Louise has also asked that you adopt the format that the gas IT group uses that she has been receiving.

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nat, Steve
Sent: Mon 7/23/2001 2:53 PM
To: Vinson, Donald Wayne; Theriot, Kim S.; Allen, Thresa A.; Reeves, Leslie; White, Stacey W.; Belden, Tim; O'Neil, Murray P.; Richter, Jeff; Hedstrom, Peggy; Dupuy, Mark; Mckeel, Richard; Murphy, Melissa Ann; Presto, Kevin M.; Will, Lloyd; Day, Smith L.; Bentley, Corry; Brackett, Debbie R.; Coulter, Kayne; Gilbert, Scotty; Zufferli, John; Dunton, Heather; Arora, Harry; Evans, Casey; Semperger, Cara; Postlethwaite, John; Beck, Sally; Imai, Rika; Hall Jr., Robert L.
Cc: Burchfield, Richard; Stock, Stephen; Perlman, Beth; Marryott, Michael; Poston, David; Gupta, Sanjay; Luu, Duong; Kumar, Madhup; Nommensen, Dave
Subject: Power Trading Systems - Bi-Weekly Update

Week Ending 07/20/01:

<<Scorecard 072001.doc>>

Note:  All 'In Prod' or 'Complete' activities will be removed in the next publication.  In addition, Fundamentals and GMS activities will be included for the first time.

Glad to discuss...

Steve


I didn't get your fax last week.  I was out sick so I didn't call Shirley.
Could you resend it?

Thanks,

Kay


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 5/7/01.   Please note that Upstream Energy Services, LLC (& Upstream Energy Company) were placed on NO TRADES.  Also, Bethlehem Steel Corporation and Westlake Petrochemical Corporation are new additions that require Credit approval.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923, Russell Diamond at x5-7095, or Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.


Was speaking w/ Lavo today on a different matter and he mentioned you were a great help to him in managing his world and was quite complementary overall. I can count on one hand how often this happens in RAC so keep it up.  Great job. Thanks, Rick


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Dan Pribble - Black Marlin

Date:		3/30/2001
Time:		9:00 AM - 10:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Auction Doesn't Get Much

A contact of mine at the ISO told me that the auction "didn't get much" and
the bids weren't "at the Governor's price".  NPR today in SF reported that
the Governor planned to negotiate the price in the bids (reported to average
6.9 cents) to a lower number.

PX Stay

CA Court issued a one-week stay preventing the PX from selling the IOUs'
block forward position (to raise cash) when notified by the Attorney General
that the Governor may want to obtain the value of the contracts.

Attorney General Orders Exisiting ISO Board to Resign

The CA Attorney General notified the existing, FERC-approved, ISO Board
Members by letter on Wednesday (1/24) that he had filed a complaint in court
and expected each of them to tender their resignation by Thursday (1/25).  He
stated that AB5 had superceded the past state law and led to creation of the
new Board appointed by the Governor.  If any Board member fails to notify the
AG today, he will assume that he or she does not intend to relinquish their
position and the AG "will proceed to serve and prosecute the complaint."  The
Board meets in Executive Session today. The only rumor I heard was for a mass
resignation. Joe Hartsoe and Ron Carroll report that FERC does not intend to
get involved at this time.  The WPTF is considering an injunction.

Governor Davis' ISO Board (DISOB)

The "new" Board met and admitted they know nothing about the details of the
ISO.  The chair is Michael Kahn (he has been replaced on the Oversight Board
by Cary Doan.  The ISO informed the DISOB that FERC was expecting a filing on
Jan 31 describing its market re-design.  The DISOB decided to file a notice
with FERC saying it has a new Board and can't meet the deadline, and
promising a progress report in 60 days.  Board Member Mike Florio reported
thatn Bill Julian in the GOvernor's office had a little group pulled together
to work on completely changing the ISO's market design.  I found out who's in
the group -- Bill Hogan and other Navigent members.  That's it. The DISOB
also agreed to an 8-hour meeting on 2/1.

Armed State Takeover?

My ISO contact (an individual who was born and raised in the Middle East)
said that the Governor's office has informed the ISO that it has "sheriffs
standing by" to takeover the powerplants if necessary and has already talked
with the union, which has agreed to keep operatig the plants if the takeover
happens.  His comment to me:   "This is like Russia."


Attached is the initial data request to be sent to MGU this week.  This list
is intended to cover the basic information we need for modelling purposes and
to get our arms around a preliminary valuation.  The more detailed and
"proprietary" questions will come later when we feel more comfortable with
the confidentiality of this process.

If anyone has any additions let me know ASAP.  (This list might help with the
SEMCO RFP as well)

thanks

Russell Murrell
(312) 541-1159


Neta,  Please confirm that MSA #940210048 with Jomax construction is still in
effect.  Thanks.


Beware of this file... it contains a virus that my Norton AntiVirus
picked up!!!
Delete it as soon as you see it! DO NOT OPEN IT!!!!

"sexy virgin.scr"


We have recently had a deal control position become available in West Power
Trading.  The main responsibilities of this position are:

To facilitate the entry of West Power deals into the trading systems
including the Services Desk.
Follow-up with Deal Clearing Settlements groups in Houston to verify accuracy
of trades in the system.  This includes timely follow-up with the traders for
clarification.
Ensure that all trades are entered by a daily deadline.
Calculate and report weighted averages of daily price and volume to Dow Jones.
Prepare and distribute daily reports to ensure all books are balanced and
report discrepancies to management.
Track and report daily and monthly error discrepancies to management and
deliver reports for possible solutions to rectify errors.
Calculate weighted averages between brokered trades and trades executed
through EOL.
Report any technical mishaps to appropriate personnel in Houston and track
computer problems until demonstrated resolutions.
Test any updated versions of applications requested by programmers and report
back any adjustments needed.

If you are interested in this opportunity, please see Jeff Richter or Amy
FitzPatrick by Friday, October 27th.

Thanks!
Amy


Just wanted to drop you a note and congratulate you on your recent
appointment (or should I say "anointment").

Also wanted to (on the QT) have a discussion about our two company's and
float an idea. I've been at Harvard for the past two months at the AMP
program and have had a chance to really look at the direction, gait and
opportunities for Cinergy and during that same time frame Enron has also
gone through some dramatic change. As is said "a little bit of knowledge is
a dangerous thing". It would be a good to see you at the very least and
grab a good bourbon and cigar.

I'll be out of the program in the middle of November and back in
Cincinnati. Send me your number and I'll give you a call sometime and we
can see if there is a reason to do anything but have the bourbon and cigar.
Congratulations again on the obvious wisdom of the Enron empire. I'm sure
they're braced for ignition.....

Regards,

Michael Cyrus


Dave, I am out of town.  I will ask Stephanie to contact your assistant to arrange a time for lunch. All the best.
 Jim Derrick


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Granville, Sue
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 8:56 AM
> To: Jacob, Sasha
> Subject: Project Stanley
>
> Report for November 28, 2000
>
> Report
>  <<Nov28.doc>>
> Articles
>  <<Nov28.txt>>
>
>
>
>

*******************************************************************
This email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper
for the presence of computer viruses

Ce courriel a fait l'objet d'un balayage contre les virus
informatiques au moyen du logiciel MIMEsweeper
*******************************************************************

 - Nov28.doc
 - Nov28.txt