---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000
02:45 PM ---------------------------

"The Alliance of Energy Suppliers" <alliance@eei.org>@ls.eei.org on
12/19/2000 02:08:58 PM
Please respond to "The Alliance of Energy Suppliers" <alliance@eei.org>
Sent by: bounce-app-ippexecs-33275@ls.eei.org
To: "Generation and Power Marketing Executives" <app-ippexecs@ls.eei.org>
cc:
Subject: Alliance Info Alert

Dear Generation/Power Marketing Executive:

This Alliance Info Alert includes three items of interest:
1)  The weekly Alliance Express newsletter
2)  Listing of recent filings at FERC
3)  Timeline for FERC action on California Markets  (attached)

                       Alliance of Energy Suppliers ExpressDecember 19, 2000

INSIDE WASHINGTON   FEDERAL AFFAIRS

***FERC De-Federalizes California Markets, Adopts Other Structural Reforms***

At a special meeting Friday afternoon, FERC unanimously approved its eagerly
awaited final order reforming the California wholesale markets, adopting the
major outlines of its November 1 proposed order and sending back to
California the responsibility for addressing state-related matters.  At the
same time, FERC deferred consideration of retroactive refund issues as well
as the imposition of region-wide price caps.  FERC reiterated their earlier
conclusions that under certain circumstances, California ratepayers were
subjected to unjust and unreasonable power rates due to California's
"seriously flawed" market structure and rules in conjunction with tight
demand and supply conditions throughout the West.

FERC adopted the November proposal to eliminate, effective immediately, the
state's mandatory requirement that the state's investor-owned utilities buy
and sell electricity through the PX, and allow these utilities to purchase
electricity through forward contracts and other alternative mechanisms to
manage supply risks.  FERC terminated the PX's rate schedules effective at
the close of business on April 30, 2001.  In effect, as Chairman James
Hoecker stated, the order de-federalizes 60 percent of the California
wholesale market established under the state's restructuring law, returning
ratemaking authority over company-owned generation to the California Public
Utilities Commission (CPUC).

The agency also modified the effective period of the $150/MWh "soft cap"
proposal, limiting its application through April 2001, whereupon a
"comprehensive and systematic monitoring and mitigation program which
incorporates appropriate thresholds, screen and mitigation measures" must be
in place.  In a related move, FERC ordered a technical conference early next
year to develop such a program by March 1, 2001, so that these measures can
be place by the May 1, deadline.

***Energy Secretary Issues Order to Power Generators and Marketers To Bolster
California's Supplies***

Energy Secretary Bill Richardson has responded to the severely constrained
power supply situation in California by issuing an order, pursuant to Section
202(c) of the Federal Power Act, to require generators and marketers to make
power available to meet the state's electricity needs.  The emergency
directive requires that, if the California independent system operator (ISO)
certifies that there is an inadequate supply of electricity, certain
suppliers would be required to make power available to the ISO if they have
power available in excess of the amount needed to satisfy service to firm
customers. Those suppliers that have provided power to the California power
exchange (PX) and the ISO over the last 30 days that have firm capacity
available would be subject to the order.

Under the order, the ISO is required to provide notice to each supplier
subject to the order of the amount and type of service requested by 9:00 pm
EST on the day before the requested service.  The ISO must, to the extent
feasible, allocate the requests in proportion to the amount of each
supplier's available power.  The price for the power provided pursuant to the
order will be set by an agreement between the ISO and the supplier.  If no
agreement is reached, FERC is to determine the just and reasonable rate at a
later date.   The order will remain in effect until 3:00 am EST on December
21, 2000 unless modified.

***EPA Sets Plans to Regulate Plants' Mercury Emissions***

EPA Administrator Carol Browner, in a long-awaited announcement, indicated
last week that the Administration will require reductions of mercury
emissions from coal- and oil-fired power plants.  The agency stated that it
plans to propose new regulations in December 2003, and hopes to finalize new
rules by December 2004.

In the wake of the decision, EEI called on EPA to make certain that any
program to control utilities' mercury emissions be based on the best
scientific information available in order to assure the protection of public
health.  "EEI urges EPA to maintain its commitment to resolving the key
scientific and technological issues," said Paul Bailey, EEI Vice President,
Environmental Affairs.  Given these uncertainties, EEI is disappointed that
the regulatory determination includes statements regarding public health
threats and hazards that are unsupported by current science," said Mr. Bailey.

"In the meantime, the electric power industry will continue to work with all
stakeholders to determine the extent to which additional mercury reductions
from power plants may be needed, and how those cuts should be achieved," Mr.
Bailey concluded.

MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS

 ***Calpine Completes Acquisition of EMI Power Assets***

Calpine Corporation has announced that it has completed the acquisition of
power assets from Energy Management, Inc. (EMI).  In the deal, Calpine
acquired the remaining interest in three recently constructed, combined-cycle
power generating facilities located in New England, as well as a joint
marketing venture between Calpine and EMI.  Prior to the transaction, Calpine
held a 50 percent net interest in the projects.

"We are very pleased to have completed the acquisition of these new and
highly efficient power plants.  The Dighton, Tiverton, and Rumford facilities
were among the first merchant power plants to enter commercial operation in
New England," said Calpine Senior Vice President Bob Alff.  "Combined with
our other announced project in the Northeast, we have created a coordinated
system of low-cost assets, with excellent geographic diversity, to provide
power to a very attractive New England market," added Alff.

***Exelon Completes Acquisition of 49.9 Percent of Sithe***

Exelon Corporation and Sithe Energies have announced the completion of
Exelon's acquisition of 49.9 percent of the stock of Sithe.  The completion
of the acquisition finalizes an agreement in which PECO Energy Company agreed
to purchase 49.9 percent of Sithe's assets in North America for $682
million.  PECO has since merged with Unicom Corporation to form Exelon
Corporation.

Under the terms of the agreement, Exelon has the option to purchase the
remaining 50.1 percent of Sithe within two to five years at a price based on
prevailing market conditions when the purchase option is exercised.  Exelon
and Sithe will continue to operate independently, said the companies.

ENERGY DATA

*** Weekly Electric Output (Week 50)***

Electric output reached 74,737 GWh for the week ending December 9 (Week 50),
with the highest increase over 1999 levels in the Mid-Atlantic region, which
had a 15.8 percent increase over 1999.  Looking at year-to-date information,
the Pacific Southeast leads the nation in growth of output.  For more
information, email alliance@eei.org.

WHO'S WHO

***Allegheny Energy Announces Leadership Change***

Allegheny Energy, Inc. this week announced the appointment of Michael
Morrell, Senior Vice President and CFO, as President of its unregulated
supply business, Allegheny Energy Supply Company, effective February 1,
2001.  Morrell will replace Peter Skrgic, current President, who will be
retiring on that date after 37 years of service to the company.

In his new position, Mr. Morrell will direct and continue the growth of
Allegheny's energy supply business, which operates and markets competitive
retail and wholesale electric generation throughout the eastern US.
Additionally, Morrell will identify new opportunities to expand the Company's
generation holdings, announced a press release.

The Alliance Express is a free news service sponsored by the Alliance of
Energy Suppliers.  This document can be redistributed.  Please send
questions, comments, or requests to alliance@eei.org, or telephone
202/508-5680.

***Due to the holidays, the Alliance Express will not be published next
Tuesday, December 26.

                                             == RECENT FERC FILINGS ==

(1)  RTO DEVELOPMENTS

*  The following entities filed comments regarding the California wholesale
electric market.  EL00-95-000, et. al.  Filed December 13, 2000.

-  AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOC.:  "Market Power: Will We Know It When We See
It?  The California Experience"
-  SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.: "Proof that Soft Price Caps Do Not Result
in Lawful Rates" and request for rehearing
-  SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.: Request for immediate modification of the
December 8, 2000 Order
-  SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC: Motion to clarify the record

*  The following entities filed motions for an immediate modification and to
intervene regarding the Commission's emergency order December 8 approving the
CA ISO's tariff amendments.  ER01-607-000, ER00-95-000 et. al.  Filed
December 13, 2000.

-  WESTERN POWER TRADING FORUM
-  RELIANT ENERGY POWER GENERATION
-  PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
-  CA ISO
-  DYNEGY POWER MARKETING

*  SOUTHERN ENERGY COMPANIES filed a supplemental protest regarding PJM's
Order 2000 Compliance Filing.  RT01-2-000.  Filed December 14, 2000.

(2) OATT/TRANSMISSION

*  UGI UTILITIES filed an interconnection agreement with ALLEGHENY ENERGY
SUPPLY CO.  ER01-617-000.  Comments due by December 28, 2000.

*  PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO filed proposed revisions to its FERC
Electric Tariff, a statement of Policy and Code of Conduct governing the
relationship between itself and wholesale power marketing affiliates and a
notification of a change in status relating to its authorization to sell
power at market-based rates.  ER01-615-000.  Comments due by December 28,
2000.

*  AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP. (AEP) filed an executed
interconnection agreement between INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. and DUKE ENERGY
BERRIEN.  The agreement is pursuant to AEP COMPANIES' OATT.  ER01-626-000.
Comments due by December 29, 2000.

*  COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. filed revisions to its OATT to reflect the
creation of a new generation subsidiary of EXCELON CORP., COMED's holding
company.  ER01-628-000.  Comments due by December 29, 2000.

*  DETROIT EDISON COMPANY filed a Service Agreement for Network Integration
Transmission Service under the Joint OATT between itself and CONSUMERS
ENERGY.  The Service Agreement is between itself and NORDIC MARKETING.
ER01-622-000.  Comments due by December 28, 2000.

*  DETROIT EDISON COMPANY filed service agreements for short-term firm and
non-firm point-to-point transmission service under the joint OATT between
itself and CONSUMERS ENERGY. The Service Agreement is between itself and H.Q.
ENERGY SERVICES.  ER01-621-000.  Comments due by December 28, 2000.

*  LOUISIANA GENERATING filed a motion to intervene and protest regarding
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY's Restated and Amended Electric System
Interconnection Agreement between SOUTHWESTERN and LOUISIANA GENERATING.
ER01-504-000.  Filed December 13, 2000.

*  ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATE SERVICES filed a response to several protests
regarding its proposed amended OATT.  ER01-312-000.  Filed December 14, 2000.

*  ELECTRICITIES OF NORTH CAROLINA, PIEDMONT MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY and the
CITIES OF ORANGEBURG and SENECA, SC filed a motion to intervene and protest
regarding DUKE ENERGY, CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT and SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC &
GAS' proposed accounting and rate treatment of start-up costs associated with
establishing a new RTO.  EL01-13-000.  Filed December 14, 2000.

*  SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES filed a proposed amendment to its OATT in order
to incorporate creditworthiness criteria, interconnection procedures and
source and sink requirements.  ER01-668-000.  Filed December 14, 2000.

*  BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION filed a petition for declaratory order
stating that its proposed OATT satisfies the Commission's reciprocity
compliance principles.  NJ01-1-000.  Filed December 14, 2000.

*  AMERICAN TRANSMISSION CO. filed proposed Open Access Transmission rates
and requested expedited consideration.  ER01-677-000.  Filed December 15,
2000.

(3) MARKET COMPLAINTS

*  H.Q. ENERGY SERVICES filed for an Order directing the NY ISO to restore
the original market clearing prices for energy on May 8, 2000.  EL01-19-000.
Comments due January 2, 2001.

*  NEW ENGLAND POWER CO. filed an answer to the RHODE ISLAND ATTORNEY
GENERAL's protest regarding the application of the joint owners of the
undivided interest in the Millstone 3 nuclear plant to transfer ownership to
the DOMINION Applicants.  EC00-137-000 and ER00-3639-000.  Filed December 13,
2000.

(4) MERGERS/CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING

(5) MISCELLANEOUS

*  CA ISO filed an amendment to schedule 1 of the Participating Generator
Agreement between CA ISO and SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES.  ER01-619-000.
Comments due by December 28, 2000.

*  AUTOMATED POWER EXCHANGE filed a new rate schedule under which it will
provide its auction and scheduling service in its California market.
ER01-658-000.  Filed December 14, 2000.

*  AUTOMATED POWER EXCHANGE filed a new rate schedule under which it will
provide its auction and scheduling service in a new geographic market, known
as the APX Midwest Market.  ER01-659-000.  Filed December 14, 2000.

Nancy Tarr
Manager, Business Development
ntarr@eei.org
202-508-5680

_________________________________________________________

 - Timeline.doc


I have no negative information on any of these proposed counterparties.

	Tana Jones
	10/25/2000 05:55 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Marie Heard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane
McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Steel approvals

Attached are some of the new steel counterparties.  I need to give EOL
responses by Friday for all these counterparties.  In addition, we should
have more coming through, for a total of about 100-150 new counterparties we
have to approve by Friday.  I will need your responses, if any, ASAP, as I
still need to fill in Legal's approvals and return them.  Thanks!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 05:51 PM -----

	Lisa Lees
	10/25/2000 05:41 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Naveed Ahmed/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Steel approvals

---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 05:31 PM
---------------------------

Bradley Diebner
10/25/2000 05:32 PM
To: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Steel approvals

Please distribute.

Thanks,
Brad


just got it

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Kim [mailto:PARKS_KIM@da.co.harris.tx.us]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: RE: Thanks

How about this?  It may be too formal, but I don't know how well you know
this guy.  Call me before you send it.

Paul,

Thanks for forwarding my resume to Tom.  I met with him and several other
nice people over there this afternoon.  They seem like a great group to work
with.  The position sounds very interesting and like it would be a good
opportunity.  Hopefully, something will work out.  Again, I really
appreciate your efforts.

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:06 PM
To: Kim Parks (E-mail)
Subject: Thanks

Paul
	Thanks for forwarding my resume to Tom. I had the opportunity to
meet with him and a group over there this afternoon.  Seem like a nice group
you work with. Hopefully things will work out, sounds like a good
opportunity. Once again, thanks for your efforts.

JOE

can you improve this? ( rewrite)

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Prof. Peter Tufano
Harvard Business School
Morgan Hall 377
Soldiers Field
Boston, Massachusetts 02163
Phone: (617) 495-6855
Fax:    (617) 496-6592
Email: ptufano@hbs.edu
http://www.people.hbs.edu/ptufano


?
 - santa191.jpg


Guys, pending the sale of the Wilton Centre unit, I would suggest that we not
execute the gas balancing arrangement.  The parties should continue to
operate and invoice based on the verbal agreement; however, lets not execute
the agreement or put it in the data room.  We should represent to potential
buyers that we have an interconnect agreement with Northern Border and have
been accessing supply out of the Chicago spot market.

All other gas supply/transport/balancing agreements for the other facilities
(including the Northern Border interconnection and the ComEd reg cap deal)
will be conveyed to the new buyers through the sale of the LLC.

Regards
Delainey


Dear Matt:  For your information, what follows is a list of the companies
used by the client group under:

EWS, Asset Group (this list may not be complete):

Crestone Gathering Services, L.L.C. (formerly Enron Midstream Services,
L.L.C.)
Enron Field Services Corp.
Enron Compression Services Company
Hanover Measurement Services Company, L.P.
Houston Pipe Line Company

EWS, Mexico Group:

Mexican
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Mexico, S. de R. L. de C.V.
Enron de Mexico, S. de R. L. de C.V.
Enron Energ?a Industrial de M,xico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
Enron Servicios de Mexico, S. de R. L. de C. V.
Desarrolladora de Predios del Norte, S. de R. L. de C.V.
Desarrolladora de Predios del Centro, S. de R. L. de C.V.
Desarrolladora de Predios del Este, S. de R. L. de C.V.
Desarrolladora de Predios del Oeste, S. de R. L. de C.V.
Desarrolladora de Predios del Noreste, S. de R. L. de C.V.
Compa?a Energ?a de Baja, S. de R.L. de C.V.

Dutch
Enron Cantarell Holdings B.V. (formely Explorer Holdings B.V.) ) dissolution
req. 1/2000
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Mexico Holdings B.V.
Enron Mexico I B.V.
Enron Mexico II B.V.
Enron Mexico III B.V.
Enron Mexico IV B.V.
Enron Mexico V B.V.
Enron Mexico VI B.V.
Enron Mexico VII B.V.
Enron Mexico VIII B.V.
Enron Mexico IX B.V.
Enron Energ?a Industrial de M,xico B.V. (formerly Enron Mexico X B.V.)
Enron Energ?a Industrial de M,xico Holdings B.V.
Enron Energ?a Noroeste B.V. (formerly Enron Mexico XI B.V.)
Enron Cogeneraci?n Metropolitana B.V. (formerly Enron Mexico XII B.V.)
Enron Mexico XIII B.V.
Enron Mexico XIV B.V.
Enron Mexico XV B.V.
Enron Mexico XVI B.V.
Enron Mexico XVII B.V.
Enron Mexico XVIII B.V.

Cayman
Enron Mexico Holdings I Ltd.
Enron Mexico Holdings 2 Ltd.
Enron Mexico Holdings 3 Ltd. ) co. released for Azurix re-purchase, name
changed
Enron Mexico Holdings 4 Ltd. ) deleted in 2001
Enron Mexico Holdings 5 Ltd. ) deleted in 2001
Enron Mexico Holdings 6 Ltd. ) deleted in 2001

U.S.A.
Enron Mexico Corp. - deleted in 2001
Enron Mexico Holdings I  L.L.C.
Enron Mexico Holdings II  L.L.C.
Enron Mexico Holdings III  L.L.C.
Enron Mexico Holdings IV  L.L.C.
Enron Industrial Energy of Mexico Holdings I, L.L.C.
Enron Industrial Energy of Mexico Holdings II, L.L.C.
Enron Mexico Holdings XIV, L.L.C.
Enron Mexico Holdings XV, L.L.C.
Enron Mexico Holdings XVI, L.L.C.
Enron Mexico Holdings XVII, L.L.C.
Enron Mexico Holdings XVIII, L.L.C.
Baja Energy Company, L.L.C.
Automotive Industrial Energy Company, L.L.C. (SRL it was created to own may
not be formed)

Best wishes,
Mary

Mary C. Ogden
Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services/Enron Americas/Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3876d
Houston, TX  77002-7361
Phone:  713-853-7796
Fax:  713-646-3490
Mary.Ogden@enron.com


Jeff,
Enclosed is a letter of invitation from Paul Ziff to speak at our upcoming
North American Gas Strategies Conference in Calgary on November 5.? Please
don't hesitate to call if you have any questions.? We look forward to your
early response.

 <<Ltr -SkillingENRON.doc>> ?  <<H01 Brochure.pdf>> ?  <<Testimonials.doc>>

Shelley Soles
Conference Director
Ziff Energy Group
1117 Macleod Trail S.E.
Calgary, AB T2G 2M8
Tel? 403-234-4285
Fax 403-237-8489

 - Ltr -SkillingENRON.doc
 - H01 Brochure.pdf
 - Testimonials.doc


Gregory,

The book code is XZP for all of the Basis option deals.  The book code does
not change month to month, it is always XZP.

Thanks,
Susan

Gregory Carraway@ENRON
11/07/2000 05:01 PM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Nat Gas Basis Options

Please include book codes for these deals.


I would be happy to take this over. I am out of town today and Monday. Lets
set up a conference call on Tues. Twanda will call you to set it up.

	Kenton Erwin@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	05/16/2000 07:26 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Citgo pipeline claim

Richard, my larger projects are peaking right now, and Kristina suggested
that I ask you whether you would like to manage this matter.

A Citgo gasoline pipeline was ruptured by our subcontractor (Wilde
Construction) last May, near Luling TX.  Citgo has incurred aprox. $700k of
cleanup costs.   We believe the costs should be shared by Citgo (for failing
to correctly mark the line), Wilde (for negligently striking the line), and
Bechtel ( for not being present as our construction manager, knowing that
Wilde was working near the gasoline line).  The new complication:  The spill
may prevent the proposed buyer from purchasing the 1000-odd acres parcel
affected by the spill.  If that purchase doesn't go through, the attorney for
the Mexican national landowner told me that the mortgage on the land would be
foreclosed, and the landowner would bring an action for the lost purchase
price ($1.3MM) (which I doubt he could fully recover, since he could sell the
property for some lesser amount).

I am setting up a mediation (of Citgo, Bechtel, and Wilde), where John Odam
(our atty, with Mangham Hardy) would act as mediator.  The new info about the
land claim may change that strategy.

Would you like to manage this, or be somewhat involved, or not involved?

Thanks,

Kenton


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Ralph Reed <ralph@censtrat.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Ralph+20Reed+20+3Cralph+40censtrat+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To:	Mark Palmer (E-mail)
Subject:

here are the CA numbers from a survey conducted the first week in
August by Voter/Consumer Research, run by Jan Von Louhausen, the
pollster for President Bush:

Gray Davis

FAV             48
UNFAV	       44

STRONG UNFAV     28
STRONG FAV          15

RIGHT TRACK         34
WRONG TRACK      49

DAVIS  		40
RIORDAN          39

Note that the strong fav/unfav is a 1:1.8, which is one of the worst
numbers I have ever seen for an incumbent Governor in 20 years.  The
fav/unfav is an anemic 1:1.  The right track/wrong track is
devastating, and the gubernatorial ballot is tied.  These numbers
have changed dramatically and put Davis in a very precarious
situation politically.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Hodge, John
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 10:38 AM
To:	Neal, Scott
Subject:	FW: Highlights from this morning's ENE/DYN analyst conference call

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tucker, Patrick
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 10:25 AM
To:	Pollan, Sylvia S.; Culotta, Lindsay; Murrell, Russell E; Plachy, Denver; Cuilla, Martin; Storey, Geoff; Yawapongsiri, Virawan; Mahmassani, Souad; Donohoe, Tom; Ruscitti, Kevin; Shively, Hunter S.; Lewis, Andrew H.; Giron, Darron C.; Frihart, Bryant; Tucker, Patrick; Roberts, Linda; Luce, Laura; Hogan, Irena D.; Vickers, Frank; Williams, Jason (Trading); Mims, Patrice L.; Simpson, James; Hodge, John; Keavey, Peter F.; Mckay, Brad; Mckay, Jonathan; Pereira, Susan W.; Pimenov, Vladi; Ring, Andrea; Savvas, Leonidas; Townsend, Judy; Versen, Victoria; Barbe, Robin; Concannon, Ruth; Goodell, Scott; Jones, David; Kaiser, Jared; Loving, Scott; Bates, Kimberly; Muhl, Gil; Smith, Maureen; Smith, Shauywn; Taylor, Craig; Willis, Jim
Subject:	Highlights from this morning's ENE/DYN analyst conference call

Listened in on the analyst call this morning.  Here are my notes.  Did not yet have a chance to organize them, so they're simply in chronological order.

The call began with Watson, Bergstrom, and Whalley reading from prepared statements.  Watson spoke for c. 10 minutes, Bergstrom for 5, and Whalley spoke for perhaps 30 seconds.  Dynegy management was noticeably in control of the call.  Enron executives spoke when questions were directed to them.

Specific points:
EES will be a part of the new company.
Enron assets will be revalued at closing.
The investment in Northern Natural takes the form of convertible preferred.  If the merger does not go through, Dynegy has the right to acquire Northern for 'very little' additional consideration.  If DYN terminates the merger and ENE 'has sufficient liquidity', ENE has right to repurchase the convertible preferred.
Debt/equity of combined company expected to be <45%.
Both companies will remain on RatingsWatch negative.
ChevronTexaco will hold 169MM shares out of a total 650MM shares of the post-merger entity.
Watson reiterates that going forward, the new entity will be run with a focus on transparent and clear financial structure and disclosure, with a significant reduction in on- and off-balance-sheet leverage.
In what was termed a "new approach", the new entity will be run with a focus on cash flow rather than earnings.
Rumors that Dynegy did the deal because of an unhedged exposure to Enron are not true.  Dynegy owed Enron <$50MM.
Lay says that Enron had other options, 'particularly financial'.
All of the discussion and activity has taken place over the last two weeks.
Lay acknowledges that the number for exposure to securities lawsuits may be 'pretty big', but that the companies feel they're able to appropriately value this exposure.
Lay says we have nothing else to hide, but internal investigation still under way.
Lay:  had the SPEs been capitalized with perhaps $30MM more of risk capital, there would have been no question that they would have qualified for off-balance-sheet treatment and there would have been no need to restate earnings last week to reflect consolidation of the SPEs.
Dynegy says that 'several' internal investigations continue at Enron, and thus DYN/ENE cannot say with certainty that there's absolutely nothing else out there.
Doty (Dynegy CFO) says that late last week, ENE had 'close to a billion' in cash.
Osprey will be unwound late next summer. Marlin will be unwound after closing.
Many of the off-balance-sheet structures, including the credit-linked notes, are expected to be unwound/redeemed or at least significantly reduced prior to closing.
With regard to ENE asset dispositions, these will be accelerated to the extent possible.  However, Doty says that 'our backs are not against the wall', and the company will continue to focus on getting value for its assets as well as cash.
ENE will renew its 364-day facility (believe this is the $3Bn facility that we drew down a couple of weeks ago) within the next 6-8 weeks.
BBB-flat most likely rating for combined entity, according to initial comments from ratings agencies.
McMahon says 'no comment' to WSJ article indicating that ENE's banks are preparing to make an equity infusion into ENE in the next few weeks.
Consolidation of trading activity: Mid- and back-office consolidation will see substantial progress prior to closing, such that only the front office / trading books will need to be combined at closing.  EES, NNG and TW have no real overlap with existing DYN activity, so there won't be much integration work required there.  The big integration effort will be ENA.
Watson says that the 'creative financing' surrounded non-core assets.  Doty adds that, 'frankly', DYN assigned zero economic value to non-core businesses in their valuation model.  They bracketed the maximum expected exposure from the non-core assets/businesses and left it at that.
Watson mentions that DYN would not have gotten involved with Enron had they not been approached by 'Enron's top three executives', who said that they thought a combination with Dynegy made the most strategic sense for both companies.  Says that their approach evidenced a  willingness to work with DYN to integrate the two companies that made a big difference in Dynegy's deliberations on proceeding with the merger.
Watson/Doty said that they're NOT 100% sure that no surprises remain in Enron's books--but that the risk/reward offered by the combination was compelling.
The deal does have material-adverse-change outs for Dynegy, covering any MAC regarding Enron's assets or businesses.  Dynegy's lawyers indicated that the MAC language was a 'blunt instrument' under which it would be difficult to bring a case, so Dynegy inserted a specific paragraph that gives Dynegy the right to terminate the merger if the Enron's total legal liability (from any source or cause of action) tops $3.5Bn prior to closing.
McMahon adds that there 'could' be more restatements, but he 'does not expect' there to be more restatements.
ENE international hard assets definitely on the asset disposition list.
The merger structure calls for a new entity to take over Enron.
Enron is planning to hold an Enron-specific conference call in the next few days, tentatively scheduled for Wednesday.
Initial reaction of ratings agencies 'very positive' to combined entities.
McMahon acknowledges that Enron would have had to have an additional equity infusion prior to year-end, had the merger not materialized.
Dynegy's earnings guidance places Enron-related earnings accretion at $0.90-0.95, which represents a '25% haircut' to Enron internal estimates.  Doty says that this is all operating earnings--figure does not include any amounts from expected synergies.
Doty says that both Enron and Dynegy's books, as far as he understands, are relatively short-term in weight, and this will continue to be the weighting of the new entity.  Says a 'very very substantial' portion of future trading earnings will be expected to be cash.
ChevronTexaco's investment in Dynegy was calculated at a 5% discount to public prices on the date of negotiation (not disclosed).  Given the runup in Dynegy stock last week, ChevronTexaco's investment is now at a 'more substantial' discount to market prices.  ChevronTexaco has provision to get 'different prices at closing if those prices are substantially better'.  (No further clarification given).
Whalley believes that 'we'll retain' the Enron traders and marketers. They're used to being part of a winning team, and the combined entity will definitely be a winner.  They have talked with most of the Enron business leaders, and they are 'very excited' by the combination.  They will be working with the Enron business leaders to ensure talent is retained.  Whalley was asked if there will be any key employee retention provisions.  He says that 'to the extent necessary, yes.'
Watson says that the trading strategy of the combined entity will be a combination of DYN and ENE--there will be more of an asset-backed trading focus, but by the same token the new Dynegy will be involved in much more financial market-making trading than the Dynegy of today.
Watson says that if there were to be any change in culture, he's a strong team player.  He does not want to see an individual do well if the company or division does not do well.

Give me a call if you'd like me to try to clarify any of these comments.

Patrick Tucker
x3-3055


Why in the world would I want a picture of you at one of your gay bars?????    So did you crop out your backdoor man?
Really quit trying to hit on me. I'm not bi.

Or is that a picture of you at the new Vail condo? If it's at the Vail condo then it's ok that you're gay.

So what's up with you? I see the ski trip is starting to take form. You know we have to go meet the All Girl Ski team.
So are you getting ready for them? Damn they about killed me last time. Those steep, tight tree trails. And then the last run of the day - the ski run from hell.

I was just thinking. Have you ever been to my place? (reminder to Pual: Donnie is not gay) One of these days if you're in town maybe a group of us could go out to eat or something.

Later
Heavy D

----- Original Message -----
From: Lucci, Paul T.
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:03 PM
To: Bob Williams (E-mail); Brian Veazey (E-mail); Cameron Cryans (E-mail); don bratcher (E-mail); Joey Brewer (E-mail); john d.williamson (E-mail); Larry Bevans (E-mail); Michael
Subject: FW: Picture

Here is a picture of me, you should all save it and have me sign it next
time we get together!


Kim:

Can you fill out the gas piece of this?

C


Hi Clark,

Good to hear from you.  I'm headed to NYC this week, so lunch doesn't look
good.  I would love to see Nancy, though.  She did a very nice job for us.

I can't find any information on Corey.  Can you give me a little background
information?  I couldn't find him in the BP directory or website.

Hope all is well with you, and I hope we can get together soon.

Kay

"Clark Thompson" <cthompson@bracepatt.com> on 01/26/2001 06:28:12 PM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Catching up

Hope all is well.  I know it has been a while and I was hoping to catch up.
Corey Brown left me a message that you had called to ask us to work on a
couple of divestitures in Illinois, and I wanted to thank you for keeping us
involved.  As I have said before, we really like working with you all and
want to be as much help as possible.  I have expanded our group so that we
can provide more flexiblity and have greater availability to you.

Would you have time over the next week or so to grab lunch and catch up?
Nancy Wodka will be in town on Tuesday and Wednesday, and I was wondering if
one of those would work for you?  There is an outside chance that I might
have to go to NC on Wednesday, but Tuesday should be fine either way.  Let me
know if one of these works for you or if another time would be better.

Look forward to hearing from you.  Thanks.

cgt


Start Date: 1/7/02; HourAhead hour: 5;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


I thought you might like this! Emmye

-----Original Message-----
From: Dee_Anna_Dill@jbhunt.com [mailto:Dee_Anna_Dill@jbhunt.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 12:14 PM
To: James.Dill@clorox.com; tbarger@comp.uark.edu; emmye@dracospring.com;
Neal_P._Martin@dstsystems.com; Shelly.Stouffer@wcom.com;
k2thomp@wal-mart.com; Kelly_Alford@jbhunt.com; Steve_Kelly@jbhunt.com;
Carl_Pegue@jbhunt.com; Chris_Cutter@jbhunt.com
Subject:

The Lost Dr. Seuss Book

I love my Job

I love my Job, I love the Pay!
I love it more and more each day.
I love my Boss; he's/she's the best!
I love his boss and all the rest.

I love my Office and its location -
I hate to have to go on vacation.
I love my furniture, drab and gray,
and the paper that piles up every day!

I love my chair in my padded Cell!
There's nothing else I love so well.
I love to work among my Peers -
I love their leers and jeers and sneers.

I love my Computer and all its Software;
I hug it often though it doesn't care...
I love each Program and every File,
I try to understand once in a while!!

I'm happy to be here, I am I am;
I'm the happiest Slave of my uncle Sam.
I love this Work:  I love these Chores.
I love the Meetings with deadly Bores.

I love my Job - I'll say it again -
I even love these friendly Men -
These men who've come to visit today
In lovely white coats to take me away!!!


In case you didn't see it 7/16/01 -- Palmer quoted
Senate power play jolts Enron  'The whole thing stinks to high heaven." That
was the assessment Adrian Moore, executive director of Reason Public Policy
Institute, gave of a state Senate committee's recent move to hold Enron Corp.
in contempt for refusing to hand over subpoenaed documents.  We're inclined
to agree. The Texas-based energy merchant has filed a countersuit in
Sacramento Superior Court, arguing that the Senate has no right to wield
influence beyond state borders and that putting the documents into public
view "jeopardized confidential business information," the Register reported
Thursday.  The court should order the Senate either to make its document
request more specific or to drop the contempt charge and subpoena altogether.
Robert Levy, a constitutional law expert at the Cato Institute, told us that
Enron's point about disclosing confidential information will be its strongest
argument in court.  While Enron can't hide behind state borders, Levy says
the Senate's request is not tailored narrowly enough to ensure information
that could damage Enron's market viability is not released. He said the
Senate should have to let a judge decide whether releasing the documents is
necessary for its investigation and avoids unfairly harming Enron.  Instead,
the full Senate just has to approve the committee's recommendation for
Enron's executives to become criminals. "It seems to me that's a scary
proposition," Levy said. "Why should the Senate have such plenary power?"
Good question.  Moore told us it's because the energy crisis has created an
"all-bets-are-off" situation in Sacramento, where anything goes so long as
it's attacking the energy companies. Because Enron is just a merchant, not a
producer, of energy, it couldn't have had much at all to do with manipulating
the market. "It's impossible," Enron spokesman Mark Palmer told us Friday.
"We don't have anything to withhold.  We don't have an interest in high
prices in California. We're just interested in a marketplace that works."
Added Moore, "It's pretty hard to spin a realistic scenario where they
(Enron) engaged in gouging." Moore said a judge's recent ruling that
criticized Davis' allegations against energy producers gives hope the
Sacramento court very likely could side with the law rather than the
witchhunt. Here's hoping he's right.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


Here are the confirms as discussed this morning. I need language for "Contract Price".

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


Are you the keeper of Enron's ISDA membership?  If so, can you let us know
membership ID?  Tracy Cooper/Cynthia Harkness in EBS Legal are interested to
access some ISDA publications which are limited to members only.

Thanks,
Sylvia Hu
Corporate and Law Information Services
x36775

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Flores, Nony
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 5:17 PM
To: Hu, Sylvia
Cc: Overturf, Elaine; Obrecht, Paulette
Subject: Re: ISDA

Sylvia,

You may want to check either with Mark Taylor or Tana Jones.

Thanks.
Nony

	Sylvia Hu/ENRON@enronXgate 06/04/2001 05:01 PM 	   To: Elaine
Overturf/ENRON@enronXgate, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paulette
Obrecht/ENRON@enronXgate  cc:   Subject: ISDA

Hi!

Does anyone know who at Enron is the contact person for ISDA ( International
Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.) (http://www.isda.org) membership?

Sylvia
x36775

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Cooper, Tracy
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 4:53 PM
To: Hu, Sylvia
Subject: Hi Sylvia

Sylvia

we are members of ISDA -- we are listed as a primary member -- however there
is a place to logon and I don't have that password -- any idea who the keeper
of that would be?

thanks!

Tracy J. Cooper
Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone: (713) 345-9534
Fax: (713) 646-8537
Tracy_Cooper@Enron.net


The new deal should have the same price as the deal that you copied.

D

Michael Olsen@ENRON
02/26/2001 02:54 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: deal 637225

This is the deal we made for El Paso last Friday to replace deal 235670,
which had Teco.  Julie Meyers needs a price to be added to the deal.  Which
price should I add?


Hi.  I paged you soon after I left the school, but never heard back.  I also
tried your cell, but it said it wasn't on.  Are you plugged in today?

ckm


Hello Sarah:
My name is Jeff Dasovich.  I work for Enron in Enron's San Francisco office.
Last Friday, the Chairman of our company, Ken Lay, met with Kevin Sharer and
other CEOs from California to discuss the energy crisis in California and the
need to develop as soon as possible a comprehensive solution to the problem.
Mr. Sharer asked for some additional background on the issues and the
solution and asked that you be contact person.  That information is attached.
If you have any  questions, don't hesitate to contact me at 415.782.7822 or
on my pager at 888.916.7184.

Best regards,
Jeff Dasovich

Jeff Dasovich
Senior Director
Enron Corp
101 California Street
Suite 1950
San Francisco, CA  94111
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/14/2001 12:11 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	05/11/2001 08:32 PM

		 To: scott.mcnealy@engeng.sun.com, piper.cole@sun.com
		 cc: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, skean@enron.com, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Background for Enron Solution to California's Electricity
Crisis--Follow up from Meeting on 5.10.01

Attached is additional background on the solution that Ken Lay discussed
today and that Enron is proposing as a comprehensive solution to California's
electricity crisis.  If you have any  questions, don't hesitate to contact me
at 415.782.7822 or on my pager at 888.916.7184.

Best regards,
Jeff


I apologize.  I thought I'd put you on my "big" distribution list.  When and
if I do any updates to smaller groups.  I'll put you on those, too.  Look
forward to meeting and discussing next time I'm in Houston.

Best,
Jeff

	Kristin Walsh/ENRON@enronXgate
	07/06/2001 12:12 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: California Updates

Jeff,
 Hope everything in California is going well and hope you had a good 4th of
July.  Earlier today, I was meeting with some people from EES/ENA and they
mentioned that you send out regular updates on California.  I would be very
interested in being added to the distribution list.  This would help us see
if there are any discrepancies in what we independent report and give us
insight on which issues need to be explored further.  If you are ever in
Houston, I would love to meet with you and discuss some of our common
interests as it relates to commercial operations.  Please let me know if you
have any questions or are unable to add me to the distribution list.

Thanks,
Kristin Walsh
(713) 853-9510


Randy & Richard:

I am working with Scott Turner in connection with the possible assignment of
shares of CanFibre from Kafus to Enron.  Under Canadian securities law, a
company is required to disclose a "material change".  A material change
includes a change in ownership that may significantly be expected to affect
the trading price of shares of a company.  As a result of the order issued by
the British Columbia Securities Commission, we believe that there is a
disclosure obligation that affects at least CanFibre, and may affect Enron.

We have therefore drafted a proposed press release for CanFibre for your
review and comment, and would ask that you consider whether Enron is also
required to disclose the potential assignment.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Tamara

Tamara L. Howarth
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Suite 2600, Three Bentall Centre
595 Burrard Street, PO Box 49314
Vancouver, BC  V7X 1L3

Tel:  604.631.3353
Fax:  604.631.3309
E-mail:  tamara.howarth@blakes.com

This e-mail communication is confidential and legally privileged.  If you are
not the intended recipient, please notify me at the telephone number shown
above or by return e-mail and delete this communication and any copy
immediately.  Thank you.

 - PressRel.DOC


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042804.txt


I have a friend who is looking to change employers.  He is in the IT field.
I was looking on the intranet and found this posting.  Although, he would be
interested in any similar job.  I will attach his resume.  What is the best
way to get his resume in front of the proper people?  I would appreciate your
opinion.  I don't work in the IT field and really don't know anyone at Enron
that does.  Thanks in advance for your help.

DG
3-9573


Can you please help Greg get this info.  I have to think that we have this
info somewhere.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 08/17/2000
07:32 AM ---------------------------

Greg Couch@ECT
08/16/2000 02:08 PM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Requested information on Transport

John,

I want to update you on the additional information you requested yesterday
(intrinsic and extrinsic $ assigned to each deal when originally booked).

Due to changes in personnel, the time that has elapsed, and the Excel model
used in the original valuation of the deals, obtaining the initial values has
proven to be more of a challenge than I had initially anticipated.  I am
working with the current book administrators for the transport model to pull
together what information we can find.  I have also spoken with Colleen and
placed phone calls to the prior (and original) administrator of the transport
option model.

I am not sure, at this point, that we will be able to pin down the original
values for all of the deals.  I will get you what I can, as soon as I can.
In the meantime, please let me know if you have questions and/or concerns.

Greg


any lips and a-holes with that??

rlmichaelis@hormel.com on 06/13/2000 10:58:03 AM
To: Doug Towns <dttowns@swbell.net>
cc: Mike.Carson@enron.com

Subject: RE: When are we having a party?

No need to marinade.  The tenderloins will be delivered by the
pork man, already marinated and always tender ... guaranteed

Ryan

************************************************************************
   This email and any files transmitted with it are intended only
   for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
   If you received this email in error please forward the message to:
   contentadmin@hormel.com
************************************************************************


Thanks

From:  Ted Murphy
08/28/2000 01:36 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Frank Hayden, Sunil
Dalal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re:

John,
Delainey asked Buy and Skilling to extend it for the next two weeks.
Consider it extended thru 9/12/00.
Ted


Kris,

Please forward this to the appropriate person.

We are buying gas from Duke at the Trevino Plant on Gulf Energy (Tejas)
Pipeline.  This is a purchase that we obtained with the CES deal.  Duke
(Laura Bates) has called, saying that they have not received payment in 4 or
5 months.  The deal in Sitara is #145125.  Please look into this and let me
know where we stand.

Thanks.

D


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001 04:28 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	04/20/2001 04:25 PM

		 To: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>, Leslie
Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON,
MDay@GMSSR.com
		 Subject: Re: SCE Advice Filing on PX Credit -- Protest

Looks good, Scott.  One thing:  I admit I'm not a lawyer, so someone needs to
show me the precise language in AB 1890 that 1) requires the credit (which, I
believe was created by the PUC, not the legislature) to be based on market
and 2) requires DA customers to be indifferent to be from DA suppliers.

Mike Day:  Do you concur with Scott's interpretation in AB 1890?

Like your arguments, Scott.  Just want to clarify that we're on solid legal
ground before putting the arguments foreward in a brief and/or protest.

Best,
Jeff

	Scott Stoness@EES
	04/20/2001 10:46 AM

		 To: JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com> @ ENRON
		 cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie
Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: SCE Advice Filing on PX Credit -- Protest

We should protest this issue and argue that nothing should change but that
the Px credit should be based on DJ-NP15 and DJ-SP15 rather than the defunct
Px because AB1890 requires it to be based on market (not costs).  Changing to
procured energy is inconsistent with the law AB1890 which requires DA
customers to be indifferent to buying from DA suppliers.
And since DA suppliers face costs close to DJ-NP15/SP15, that is the only
appropriate available method.

Further, the issue of how to calculate Px is interrelated to whether DA
customers should be charged the generation surcharges ($10 +$30).  DA
customers should be given market based Px credits (based on DJNP15/SP15)
because its the law.  There are 2 possible interpretations resulting from the
combination of AB1890 and the new law.
The DA customers should get a market based Px credit and not pay any
surcharge.
The DA customers should get a market based Px credit and pay the $30 + $10
surcharges
Interpretation 1 results in DA customers getting lower rates than all other
customers.  It seems unlikely that the legislation would have this intent.
Interpretation 2 results in DA customers getting the same rate as all other
customers until the end of AB1890.  This seems like the likely interpretation
since otherwise the new legislation would have repealled AB1890.  Thus given
that the DA customers are being held indifferent to frozen rates plus $40,
they should get a Px market based credit plus pay the surcharge until the
rate freeze ends.

Once the Px credit ends (Mar 2002), the surcharge should end because the law
(AB1890) no longer requires them to be held at frozen rates and because:
Any customer that is being served by a supplier other than DWR and the
utility is not causing any costs for DWR or the utility therefore they should
not be charged for them.

In the event that Px credit is not set based on market value (if the courts
interpret the law differently than Enron) then there should be no generation
surcharge for DA customers.

This is the same argument we should make in our brief on rate setting
Scott

JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com> on 04/20/2001 09:03:06 AM
To: "Harry Kingerski (E-mail)" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "Robert
Neustaedter (E-mail)" <Robert.Neustaedter@enron.com>, "Scott Stoness
(E-mail)" <sstoness@enron.com>, "Tamara Johnson (Business Fax)"
<IMCEAFAX-Tamara+20Johnson+40+2B1+20+28713+29+20345-7374@GMSSR.com>
cc: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)"
<smara@enron.com>
Subject: SCE Advice Filing on PX Credit -- Protest

As you are aware, SCE made an advice filing on April 5th to eradicate the PX
Rate Schedule and Replace it with Schedule PE --Procured Energy.  As part of
the filing, SCE proposes to set "on an interim basis" the cost of energy
procurement, for bundled service customers for billing purposes and in the
calculation of the energy credit for direct access customers equal to the
Generation rate component of the Customer's otherwise applicable tariff.

Two primary issues arise from SCE's statement. First what does "interim
basis" mean -- how long will this be in effect.  In starts on January 19th,
but it is unclear as to when it would end. Second, and most important. is
what is meant by the Generation rate component.  While there is not much
explanation in the April 5 advice letter, in a subsequent advice letter
filed on April 11 (1533-E), SCE set forth "Rate Schedule Specific Generation
Related Rates" which range between five and nine cents.

I have forwarded both the referenced advice letters to you earlier.  We need
to protest the change in the PX credit by Wednesday, April 25th.  All
thoughts on the matter are welcome.

Jeanne


As you know, the United Way Campaign is underway in our Portland office.
Thanks to all of you who have already contributed to the campaign.  For those
of you who intend to contribute but have not had a chance to complete the
contribution process, please contact me if you have questions, need
additional information, or need help in completing your pledge.

Participation in other internal groups is much higher than ours, so I wanted
to send this friendly reminder to make sure you have a resource to get any
questions answered.


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042322.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 22 / Preferred:   4.00 / Final:   3.89)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: SierraPowe
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/23/01
  UNIT_ID: VESTAL_6_WDFIRE
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 22 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/23/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2


please remove my email address from your distribution list.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	HotDeals <HotDeals@reply.pm0.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:45 AM
To:	kward@ect.enron.com
Subject:	Stay In Touch Over The Holidays With Free Nights and Weekends!!

 [IMAGE] << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/savezipaol.htm >> [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/savezipaol.htm >>  [IMAGE] << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/savezipaol.htm >>  [IMAGE] << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/savezipaol.htm >>       Phone  Package Includes:  -Free*  Motorola T193 -500 Minutes -Unlimited Weekend  Minutes  -Free Nationwide Long Distance -Free Nationwide Digital Roaming -AOL Instant Messenger (IM your friends from your new cell  phone with AOL Instant Messenger loaded right on the phone!!!)   Click  Here to view the FREE Cell Phone offer in your area << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/savezipaol.htm >>

 * Phone free after  rebates. Offer subject to credit approval or deposit, and is available  to customers activating a new line of service on a one-year contract with  a VoiceStream Wireless. Not all US markets are served by VoiceStream Wireless,  if you are in a non-VoiceStream Wireless area you will receive another  great offer from another major wireless company. Other restrictions apply,  see full offer for details. Offer Expires November 30, 2001.


If you guys watched the Monaco Grand Prix this past Sunday...  perhaps you saw the fellow from the Ferrari team who went on the podium to  receive the winner's trophy from Prince Ranier?

That was my good friend Luca Baldisserri, who is the chief  engineer for Ferrari and won almost everything these past few years with his  driver Michael Schumacher...Luca is likely the best car engineer in the world,  and is interested to join me in the future as a partner to operate a team in the  U.S. based CART "IndyCar" series...

I invited you both as our sport requires strong corporate  partners to function... and thought you may have interest with knowledge that  you would be working with some of the best people in the world... which would  make it reasonable to achieve a very positive return on any corporate  investment.

Please feel welcome to keep in touch... and to join us  for a race this summer if you wish.

Best to you
Eric Jensen
407.925.7489
 - luca+eric-cgp98.JPG


Got it. It's fine.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buy, Rick
Sent:	Friday, December 14, 2001 3:39 PM
To:	Parsons, Andrew
Subject:	Presentation

Here it is I hope.

Rick

 << File: draft6.ppt >>


Well, the jury is still out on communicating rankings.

I quess right now the best things to do is not tell anyone their
ranks.

Let me know you thoughts.

bob


Drop by.  We've been trading financial power for over a year.  Not many
deals, though.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           02/04/2000 10:14 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Utility Counterparties

Just a reminder to talk to me Monday about the utilities.  I was not aware we
were not currently trading financial power, which they are getting ready to
open up.  I figure the utilities will start squealing loudly when they cannot
trade.  So, I've go to start opening up my utilities...


i love you very much also and sometime i need to let you express your angst and try not to
get wrapped up in trying to make it all better but understand why you feel the way you do and work
on myself and us as a partnership in life.

ILY
dq

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Kay
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 4:10 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	RE:

seeing him or not is fine with me...I expressed my angst to you just now
because that is what I felt at that moment. I am working VERY hard
to change some of my behaviors to more productive ones for our relationship
and in light of recent 'irrational' behavior on your part I just hope you devote the
same effort and I KNOW that you are- I just forget the other avenues in which you do this
I love you
Kay


Have I seen the Explorer??  Nope.  I just get to work for a living.  I don't
get to enjoy life's pleasures.


I have absolutely nothing to do with hiring IT professionals (nor do I want to).

-----Original Message-----
From: Susan Elias [mailto:selias@SOURCET.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 8:56 AM
To: Hyatt, Kevin
Subject: All flavors of System Administrators/Experienced/ at very
competitive rates $40- $60 per hr

Good Morning Kevin,

We have some excellent System Administrators available for immediate
placement. A brief profile is given below, for further information feel free
to contact me at 770-754-4500x354 or email selias@sourcet.com
Abdou Konate
6 years IT professional/NT-2000-Novell 4.11 & 5.1-HP - SUN Systems
Administrator, Sun E10K, MC/ServiceGuard, SANS, EMC
* Extensive experience in Windows NT and 2000, Novell, HP-UX & SUN Solaris
systems administration
* Experience with installation and maintaining Sun Enterprise 10000 Servers
* Experience working in a client/server environment with HP-UX, AIX 4.3, NT
and Sun
* Experience with Shell Scripting, MC/ServiceGuard, Replication, RAID 1 & 5,
Omniback
* Experience installing, supporting, maintaining HP-UX 11, Sun, Novell, NT,
Linux, AIX
* Experience with designing, analyzing, and implementing LAN & WAN systems
* Experience with Oracle database, management, capacity planning,
administration and performance tuning
* Experience in Performance tuning, NFS, NIS, DNS and Veritas Volume
Management
* Firewall experience including Checkpoint and BackICE
* SANS and EMC Storage experience
* Managing multiple platform networks - UNIX, NT, Novell, SNMP, Netview,
OpenView
* Fluent in French

Operating Systems
* HP-UNIX 9, 10 & 11, AIX 4.3, SCO Unix 7, Sun Solaris 2.6, SUN Enterprise
10000, Linux 2.6, Novell 3.12, 4.11 & 5.1
* Windows NT 4.0/2000/95/98
Databases/Source Control Applications
* MS SQL Server, MQ Series, Access, Oracle
Software/Methodologies
* Visual Basic 5, Shell Scripting - C, Korn
* SNMP, Netview/6000, MC/ServiceGuard, OpenView
* TCP/IP, UDP, ICMP, NFS, NIS, SANS, SMTP, DNS, NDS, RAS
Hardware
* HP 9000 K Class Servers, HP 700 Desktop, Sun Enterprise 4000 & 10000,
Intel based PC Servers, IBM RS6000, EMC
* 100VG-AnyLAN, LAN/9000, Cisco Routers, Hubs, Switches, CSU/DSU
Sanjay Valanju
8 year IT professional/AIX-SP UNIX System Administrator with HACMP/TSM
System Administrator on Unix/NT systems
* Experience with AIX 4.3.x & 4.1.5 Unix systems configuration,
Installation, Planning & administration, Shell Scripting, Backup & Recovery,
performance tuning & Troubleshooting with 24/7 availability
* Experience with HACMP Clustering
* Experience with Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) 4.1.x Administration on
Unix/Windows NT environment
* Experience with AIX 4.3.x running on RS/6000 SP Complex Administration
* Database planning, estimation, and configuration experience
* SCADA system design, configuration, implementation, and administration
experience
* Microsoft Certified System Engineer (MCSE)
* GE/HARRIS Energy Control System Certified
Operating Systems
* IBM AIX 4.3.x, AIX 4.1.5, LVM, DNS, HACMP
* Motorola UNIX V-88, Windows NT 4.0
Databases/Source Control Applications

* Sybase 10.2, Trained on MS SQL Server 7.0
* HABITAT
* Tivoli Storage Manager 4.1.x
Software/Methodologies/Networking

* SQL, TCP/IP
* Korn Shell Scripting, LVM, DNS

Hardware
* IBM RS/6000 SP complex, 43P, J50, F50, Motorola VME, GE/Harris Control
System, VAX 4000
* Digital and Analog input/output devices
Juliana Melloni

9 years IT Industry experience, 5 years in Unix Administration (HP-UX, Sun
Solaris, AIX, Linux), Veritas Volume Manager, RAID 5

Summary

* Extensive experience as an HP-UX and Sun Solaris administrator
* Installation, configuration, tuning, maintenance and administration
* Administration of a multi-server 24x7 Site
* Storage management: RAID 5, EMC storage
* Internet Infrastructure implementation: Red Hat Linux 6, HP-UX Virtual
Vault, EMAIL server (SMTP, POP3), Web Server (Apache/Netscape), Proxy Server
(Squid)
* Fluent in Portuguese

Operating Systems

* HP-UX 10.20/11.00, Sun Solaris 2.5.1/2.6/7, IBM AIX and Red Hat LINUX 6

Software

* CA Unicenter TNG
* Apache, Netscape, Borne Shell scripts
* Informix raw devices creation and environment variables
* HP Open Mail
* Veritas Volume Manager 2.5
* HP-UX Virtual Vault

Hardware

* Solaris E3000, E3500, E4000, E4500, Sparcstation 20
* HP-UX 9000 class N, K, L, D
* Storage disk:EMC storage, HP-UX and Solaris Disk Array

Networking/Internet Experience

* DNS, NFS
* EMAIL server (SMTP, POP3)
* Bastion Host
* Web Server (HTTP/HTTPS)
* Server Proxy (Squid)
Raj Badithela

5 years IT industry experience/Solaris 2.x, IRIX 6.5.x, Linux 6.x/7, HP-UX
10.20 UNIX Systems Administrator, Veritas Net Backup, Legato Networker, SAN
Experience

Summary
* Over 5 years experience as a Unix System Administrator
* Multiple Unix platforms (Sun Solaris, Linux, IRIX, HP-UX) plus Windows NT
and Novell Netware experience
* TCP/IP networks management and CXFS Cluster Software experience
* Strong Veritas NetBackup, Volume manager and Legato Networker experience
* Installing, upgrading operating systems and application packages
* Experience in Banking, Broadcasting, Satellite, Biotech and Construction
Industries
* Certified Unix Administrator by BrainBench, Transcript ID. No.: 173315 -
23

Operating Systems
* Unix (Solaris 2.5.1/2.6/2.7, Red Hat Linux 6.x/7.0, IRIX 6.5.x, HP-UX
10.20), Novell Netware 4.0.1, Windows 95/98/NT

Software/Methodologies/Networking
* Korn, Bourne Shell Scripting, Perl 5.04/5.6.1, Internet Services such as
DHCP, NFS, DNS, NIS, WINS, Intranet over LAN and Software Routing using dual
homed network, Telnet, rcp, rlogin, ftp, http, TAS, NIS+, Samba, Solstice,
HP Jet Direct, NFS Maestro
* TCP/IP, IPX/SPX and NetBEUI, Legato Networker 5.5, Veritas NetBackup
3.2/3.4, Timber Wolf Software Library, VERITAS volume manager, Send mail,
SUN Solstice Disksuite, Apache Web Server, ORACLE 7.x/8.x/8i, TIS Firewall,
CERT Proxy, TCP Wrappers, Perforce, BMC Patrol, EMC Time finder
* Apache Web server 1.3.14/1.3.19, Netscape Navigator 4.75, Total Net
Server, IIS
* Familiar with HTML, SQL, Visual Basic 5.0, C++, JavaScript, Java

Hardware
* Sun E6500, Sun E4500, Sun E4000, Sun E450, Sun E250, Sun Sparc
Station20/10/5, Sun Enterprise Network Array A1000/A3500, Sun Netra, Sun
E420, Sun E220
* Silicon Graphics (Octane, O2, Onyx2/Origin 2000, Origin 3000), SGI Storage
Array TP9100, HP9000 J, K, L Servers, EMC Symmetrix
* COMPAQ Desktops- Pentium Deskpro range, Dell, StorageTek Timber Wolf-3760,
Juke box, StorageTek Tape Library L-700 (250 Slots with 2 Tape Drives), HP
and Tektronix Laser printers, Compaq IJ-600, Network Printers
* NEC Express 5800, NEC SX4 (Vector Super Computer)

Testing tools
* Trained on WinRunner, Silk, SQA Robot

****************************************************************************
***********************************************************8
This email was for Kevin.hyatt@enron.com,  to be removed , please reply back
with the same email with "REMOVE" as the subject


Attached is the Red Rock weekly report for your use and file.

Mark Lavine
Enron Transportation Services - ECN4679A
Phn : 713-345-8424
Fax : 713-646-8032
mark.lavine@enron.com


Hey guys - it looks like NCPA got our proposal and would like for us to refresh by 9 am PPT tomarrow morning.  That is 11 our time.  Jay, where are we with credit and contracts.  I think we need to have this done today.  Can you let me know what our status is?  Barry is asking me.  Kelli, can we refresh in the morning fairly quickly?  I would love to get this deal done.  Tomarrow, we need to add a little orig!  Please let me know if any of you have any questions.

thanks,

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tom Lee <TomLee@ncpa.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:49 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	RE: NCPA RFP refresh

NCPA staff has reviewed your gas basis bid provided on October 22, 2001.
The results and evaluations will be presented to the Project participants
(Cities of Alameda, Lodi, Lompoc and Roseville) on October 25, 2001 for
their decision.

Therefore, NCPA requests a refreshed bid on October 25, 2001 on or before
9:00 am for consideration by the Project participants.  A decision should be
available by 2:00 pm.

Please forward your bid to tomlee@ncpa.com.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Kim S (Houston) [mailto:Kim.Ward@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:04 AM
To: tomlee@ncpa.com
Subject: RFP response

Tom,

Attached is our term sheet in response to your request for bid.  I have
also attached sample contract for your review.  We are waiting to hear
from your credit guy to obtain some financial information.  Please call
me with any questions or concerns.

Thanks,

Kim Ward
Manager, West Gas Origination
713-853-0685

 <<ncpa Gas Supply Term Sheet.doc>>

 <<Sample_Master.doc>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001 04:51 PM -----

	Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/22/2001 04:39 PM

		 To: Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicole
Hunter/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: Click Paper Approvals, 03-22-01

Please see attached.

Regards,

Aparna Rajaram
ext. 5-4563


Susan:  let's discuss this today.  SS


I would decline

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Joannie Williamson                           04/09/2001 11:02 AM

To: Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: meeting

I don't believe that Jeff would be interested in meeting with this company.
Please advise.

Thanks,
Joannie

---------------------- Forwarded by Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron on
04/09/2001 10:43 AM ---------------------------

Michael.Munn@rutherfordconsulting.com on 04/05/2001 04:27:35 PM
To: jeff.skilling@enron.com
cc:

Subject: meeting

Jeff,

Here is some additional information on us that it was recommended I send to
you.  I am assisitant to Mark Kearns, Vice-President for Rutherford
Consulting, who resides in Houston.  When he is in town, I set up short
meetings for him of 30 minutes or so duration with companies and/or CEO's,
Presidents, etc. that he would like to bring industry informaiton to as
well as a bit more about us.

I will call after you've had the opportunity to review this to arrange a
convenient time for you both.

Michael M. Munn
Executive Assistant
 - Rutherford Consulting -- Overview Presentation.ppt


I understand that this will be executed in London.  Is there a lawyer who
will initial the NDA for EnronCredit in connection with our execution?  I'm
assuming you will have this NDA executed prior to the meeting.

Leslie

	Gillian Johnson@ENRON
	11/21/2000 01:32 PM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Craig Chaney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: I2 NDA

Thanks for taking care of this.  We will be meeting with them tomorrow.

Gillian

Leslie Hansen@ECT
11/21/2000 12:56 PM
To: Gillian Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: I2 NDA

Gillian:

Attached please find the I2 NDA as revised to provide that the term of the
NDA is 3 years and that Confidential Information disclosed under the
agreement is protected for 2 years after the date of the disclosure.

I can finalize for execution after I2 has approved the contents of this NDA.
I'll leave it to you to distribute to them.

Leslie


Michelle

Attached are the daily Mojave Topock scheduled volumes for September 2000.

Please let me know what other months that you need.

Once we determined which day(s) are different, I can work with El Paso to determine which shipper contracts caused the difference.

richard


- CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc


i think that i need to give my resume to your brother in law.  enron is collapsing.


I agree with you on the Lexus.  I'm not sure we should take it out long distance.  If Gary doesn't mind, that would be great.

ILY, K.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Watson [mailto:jwatson@nwdiagnostic.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 1:23 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: RE: San Antonio

Are you comfortable with us taking the Lexus?  Gary has offered to let us
take his car out and then I'll drive it back on Thursday (he, Lora Lee, Ivy
and an aunt are heading off to a B & B in the hill country after the
meeting).  I'd almost rather do that than chance the Lexus' transmission,
given how jumpy it was when I drove it over the weekend.

Besides, I don't think we could fit three persons' luggage in the trunk of
the Volvo.

JW

-----Original Message-----
From: Watson, Kimberly [mailto:Kimberly.Watson@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 1:07 PM
To: jwatson@nwdiagnostic.com
Subject: RE: San Antonio

No problem, it will be nice to visit with him.

K.

PS.  Does this mean that I will be in the back seat of the convertable?
If so, I'm afraid we will have to ride with the top up.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Watson [mailto:jwatson@nwdiagnostic.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 11:46 AM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: San Antonio

Kim -

Gary Heaton is going to ride with us to SA on Friday.  I'll pick him up
at
noon and then we'll head down to you or to the Spires and leave from
there.

SYT,
John

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Jeffrey
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 9:10 AM
To:	Forney, John M.
Subject:	FW: Joint QSE project managers / WMS meeting

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Day, Smith L.
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 8:21 AM
To:	Forney, John M.; Miller, Jeffrey
Subject:	FW: Joint QSE project managers / WMS meeting

We should attend this or make sure one of us goes to this.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Hailu, Ted" <thailu@testmail.ercot.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 5:13 PM
To:	1 2001 WMS and others(Wholesale Market Sub.)
Cc:	1 ERCOT Client Service Reps; Mickey, Joel; Doggett, Trip; Grendel, Steve; Bojorquez, William \"Bill\"; Noel, Thomas; Jones, Sam; Tindall, Heather; Li, Yonggang; Yu, Jun; 1 SCS Leads; Buckles, Maxine; Saathoff, Kent
Subject:	Joint QSE project managers / WMS meeting

There have been several requests from market participants for a forum to
be used to communicate issues on current market operations and upcoming
changes on a more formal basis.  In response to this request, ERCOT is
renewing the QSE project manager meetings which were used prior to the
opening of the ERCOT market to address wholesale market issues.  The
first meeting will be conducted jointly with the ERCOT wholesale market
subcommittee meeting on Tuesday, November 13th 2001. Tentative agenda
items for the first meeting are as follows:

*	9:30 - 9:45	Introductions and review of agenda
*	9:45 - 10:00 Future QSE project Manager Meetings
*	10:00 - 11:30 Market Operations - Balancing Instructions
Involving Operational Congestion and Interim Resource Specific
Deployment Instructions
*	11:30 - 12:30 Lunch
*	12:30 - 1:00 Settlements - Mismatched Schedules
*	1:00 - 1:30 ERCOT Phase II systems progress update
*	1:30 - 3:30 WMS meeting

If you are planning to attend, please RSVP with Terry Waggoner at
twaggoner@ercot.com no later than Friday November 9th, 2001.  If you
have any questions, you may contact me at the number below of call your
assigned ERCOT client representative.

Ted  Hailu
Client Relations Manager
Electric Reliability Council of Texas
E-mail: Thailu@ercot.com
Telephone: (512) 248-3873


i might have tickets


Susan:  would you please contact this party to see if they have comments?
Jennifer says they are ready to sign.  We are having a guaranty problem and
that's why this party has come up.  Please let Souad know what the response
is.  Thanks.  Sara


I just saw a fare from SD for $68 roundtrip....I have to seriously consider moving out there if it is that cheap to go to Vegas.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Mike Jillard" <mjillard@beaconelectric.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 2:18 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	RE: Beer boy II

I hope they move to L.A.  GO RAIDERS

-----Original Message-----
From: Phillip.M.Love@enron.com [mailto:Phillip.M.Love@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:09 PM
To: mjillard@beaconelectric.com
Subject: RE: Beer boy II

that is absolutely hilarious.  I have heard a rumor that the Chargers are
considering moving to LA....Is that correct?  That will be absolutely
horrendous.  I saw the game of the century the other day on ESPN
classics...Chargers vs. Dolphins 1983.  Truly awesome.  My man at the time
Winslow(racist) got carried off three times.
PL

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Mike Jillard" <mjillard@beaconelectric.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Monday, January 14, 2002 1:50 PM
   To:     Love, Phillip M.
   Subject:  RE: Beer boy II

   YEAH

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Phillip.M.Love@enron.com [mailto:Phillip.M.Love@enron.com]
   Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:32 AM
   To: mjillard@beaconelectric.com
   Subject: RE: Beer boy II

   I can not open the file...Is this the kid from the man show selling
   beer?
   I have also seen him trying to buy beer.
   PL

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Mike Jillard" <mjillard@beaconelectric.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Monday, January 14, 2002 1:21 PM
      To:     Love, Phillip M.
      Subject:  FW: Beer boy II

      Get a load of this cat.

      Jilly

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Dave Aabram [mailto:dave@mpeconsulting.com]
      Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:06 AM
      To: Maddy Aabram; Chuck Mitchell; Craig Gallegos; Karen Wozniak; Mike
      Jillard; Mike Tiffany; Paul McParlane; Rob Sickles; Tamara Carillo
      Subject: Beerboy II

      Funny Stuff!

      Dave Aabram
      MPE CONSULTING
      9466 Black Mountain Road
      Suite #250
      San Diego, CA  92126
      (p) 858.578.4788
      (f) 858.578-4761
      e-mail: dave@mpeconsulting.com

       - winmail.dat << File: winmail.dat >>

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


Avoid the crunch on election day by voting early!

ENRON is providing employees with
complimentary shuttle service
 from the Enron Building to the downtown early voting site!!

Thursday, November 2
and
Friday, November 3
1319 Texas Avenue @ Austin Street
7:00 am until 7:00 pm
(transportation by Beal's - pick-up on the West end of Andrews Street)

In order to vote early at this site,
you must be registered in Harris County
and present your drivers license for ID verification
(your voter registration card is not necessary)

Please take advantage of this opportunity and VOTE!!

For election-related questions, please reference this website:
www.co.harris.tx.us/cclerk/elect.htm


Paul:  Please see below.  How serious is this inquiry as it will require some
work on the legal side?  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/22/2000 08:51 AM -----

	Mark Elliott
	06/22/2000 08:37 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: India: derivatives

Sara,

I had a call on this from Bob a few weeks ago.  I told him that generally it
was ok, but that we would need to revise our file should he require a
definitive position, plus we would need to ensure that advice which we
ploughed through earlier last year was still current.  He told me not to do
any more work on this at the time because it was not clear whether there was
any chance of doing a deal with an Indian counterparty.

I am more than willing to send you ou all my notes, etc, however, which
crunched through the 1/14/97 opinion with Crawford's and asked supplemental
questions.

Kind regards

Mark

From: Sara Shackleton on 22/06/2000 08:31 CDT
To: Mark Elliott/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: India:  derivatives

Mark:  ENA is looking into derivatives trading with an Indian corporate.  My
latest information is the opinion from 1/14/97 rendered by Crawford Bayley &
Co. (which was part of our global survey effort a few years ago).  Do you
have anything more recent?  The ENA inquiry came from the pulp and paper
group.  Thanks for your help.  Sara


Sunday morning we will experience the first time zone change of the year.
The time change is shown below (note NO HE 3 PST).  This means that we will
now be on the same time as El Paso.  Cheers.


?

Rushing Game Matchups???  Here's how I see  the matchups this week.? Please
note, see the cheatsheet online  http://www.cheatsheets.net/week12sheet.htm?
for exactly where I rank players  and to determine who to start.? Just
because one matchup may be more favorable than another, that doesn't
necessarily  mean I'd start the player with the best matchup.? The matchup
info is meant to be just one  more tool in your box when it comes to deciding
between players.??

?

Locks:? These games heavily favor the  Offense

Tennessee,s Eddie George vs Brown  Defense?? Assuming Eddie George can get
his  injured toe healthy (and I think he can) he could have a monster game
against a  Brown Defense that,s been terrible against the rush.? For the
year, they rank # 26 in Fantasy  Points allowed to the opposing RB and they
rank # 27 in rushing yards allowed  per game over the last four weeks.?  The
Titans will likely be fired up after a stinging loss at home to the  Ravens
and I expect George to take out some frustrations on the  Browns.

Miami,s Lamar Smith vs Jets  Defense?? You,ll have to look awfully hard  to
find a hotter RB than Lamar Smith.?  In their week?8 matchup, he ran for 2
TDs and 155 yards.? At the time, it seemed like a fluke but  Smith has
maintained almost that pace since then.? Jay Fiedler and the passing game
provide  just enough threat to keep the defenses semi honest and Smith does
the  rest.? Over the last four weeks, the  Jets rank # 26 in rushing yards
allowed per  game.

New York Giant,s Ron Dayne / Tiki  Barber vs Lion Defense?? As you know by
now, the Giants  running game is governed by how close they keep the game.?
Coach Jim Fassell abandons the ground  game (especially Ron Dayne,s role)
when the Giants start to trail.? Against a less than explosive Lions  team,
the Giants ought to be able to keep this very close if not lead most of  the
way.? Detroit,s been weak  defending the run over the last four weeks where
they rank # 25 in rushing yards  allowed per game.?

Indianapolis, Edgerrin James vs Packer  Defense?? Green Bay,s allowing 135
yards  rushing per game over the last four week which ranks them # 22.? James
should continue to roll this week  against a Packer Defense that,s missing LB
Brian Williams who,s out with a knee  injury.? DE Vonnie Holiday may be
limited but he looks like he,ll play and that,s some concern but I still
look  for James to romp.

Baltimore,s Jamal Lewis vs Cowboy  Defense?? The Cowboys gave up their 200
yard  rushing days to quick slasher RBs Charlie Garner and Duce Staley but I,
m  guessing power running Jamal Lewis (who,s almost as quick as those guys)
will be  a great play against Dallas.? For  the season, Dallas ranks # 28 in
Fantasy Points allowed to the opposing RB.? Look for him to catch the ball
out of  the backfield as well.

?

Prime Matchups:?  These games favor the Offense?

San Diego,s  Terrell Fletcher / Jermaine Fazande vs Bronco Defense??  Over
the last four week, Denver ranks # 31 in rushing yards allowed per  game.??
This  game smells a lot like the Denver / Bengal game to me.? Winless team
comes into town with a big  power back and nothing to lose.? We  all remember
Corey Dillon,s record setting day and many remember Jermaine  Fazande,s big
day rushing in the last game of 1999 against the Broncos.? Terrell Fletcher
is working his way into  the mix and that,s really muddying the waters.? Keep
an eye on this one and if it looks  like one of these guys will garner the
bulk of the carries, he could be worth a  flyer.?

Philadelphia,s Stanley Pritchett / Darnell Autry vs  Cardinal Defense? The
Arizona defense remains pretty weak  against the rush.? They rank # 29  in
rushing yards allowed  per game over the last four weeks.? For the year, they
rank # 31  in Fantasy Points  allowed to the opposing RB.? The trick is
determining which Eagle RB  will get the carries.? I like  Pritchett because
he,s bigger and can bull doze his way through the Cards.? I,ve been down on
Autry as I believe  you,re supposed to have the acting career?after the
football career, not  the other way around(?

Arizona,s  Michael Pittman vs Eagle Defense??  Watch this one closely as
Pittman is struggling to get healthy with  bruised ribs.? If he can go, I
like  the matchup this week.? Philadelphia  ranks # 30 in rushing  yards
allowed per game over the last four weeks.? They,re stronger over the year
where  they rank # 18 in  Fantasy Points allowed to the opposing RB.? Thomas
Jones is in worse shape with  pneumonia so Pittman has incentive to get out
there.?

Buffalo,s  Sammy Morris / Shawn Bryson vs Chief Defense??  Morris battling a
bad ankle and looks to be a game time decision.? Bryson is plenty capable if
he can,t  go.? The Chiefs are an attractive  matchup as they rank # 28 in
rushing yards allowed per  game over the last four weeks.? They rank # 27 in
Fantasy Points allowed to the  opposing RB for the year.?  Watch this one
closely to see if the Bills offer hints to who,ll they,ll  go with.?

Green Bay,s  Ahman Green vs Colt Defense?? With Dorsey Levens out again,
Green will be asked to carry the load?  The Colts are vulnerable to the rush
ranking # 24 in rushing yards allowed per  game over the last four weeks.? If
Brett Favre can play, that,ll be a  nice boost for Green as the defense won,t
be able to key on stopping the ground  game.?

Cincinnati,s  Corey Dillon vs Patriot Defense?? How much would you rely on
Scot  Mitchell if you were Dick LeBeau??  Me neither.? Whether it,s  Akili
Smith or Scott Mitchell under center, it,s still the Corey Dillon  Show.? New
England has shown itself  to vulnerable against the rush ranking # 23 in
rushing yards allowed per  game over the last four weeks.? Dillon knows he
needs to carry the team  and he,ll do his best.? His success  will depend on
how effect Mitchell can be in drawing the defense,s attention  toward the
passing game.

??

Even Matchups:? These games  feature no real advantage either way

San Francisco,s Charlie Garner vs  Falcon Defense??  Charlie Garner
continues his great season against a Falcon team that,s playing better rush
defense than it had been.? For the  year, Atlanta ranks # 30 in Fantasy
Points allowed to the opposing RB but over  the last four weeks, they rate #
19 in rushing yards allowed per game.? If they,re without WR Terrell Owens
again, Garner will be asked to carry a little more of the load, something he,
s  gladly done all year.

Pittsburgh,s Jerome Bettis vs Jaguar  Defense?? With the WR shuffling going
on in  Pittsburgh, I think Bettis is really the only Steeler worthy of
starting in most  leagues.? He,s a solid performer  though that should have
another good day grinding the ball out.? Jacksonville ranks # 18 over the
last  four weeks in rushing yards allowed per game.? For the year, they rank
# 20 in Fantasy  Points allowed to the opposing RB.?  It,ll be power football
as the Steeler just line up and try to run over  the Jaguars.?

New England,s J.R. Redmond / Kevin  Faulk vs Bengal Defense?? The Bengals are
tough to  predict.? For the last four weeks,  they rank # 17 in rushing yards
allowed per game and for the year they come in  at # 14 in Fantasy Points
allowed to the opposing RB.? But they absolutely shut down RB Emmitt  Smith
last week.? I look for Redmond  and Faulk to have moderate success against
this improving unit.? Redmond is questionable with ribs so  keep an eye on
this one.?

Chicago,s James Allen vs Buccaneer  Defense?? As with the pass defense,
Tampa  Bay is good but not quite as dominant as their reputation.? For the
last four weeks, they rank # 16  in rushing yards allowed per game allowing
106 per game.? For the year, they rate # 9 in Fantasy  Points allowed to the
opposing RBs so it,s not like they,re invincible.? With Shane Matthews behind
center and  scaring no one though, it could be a long  day.?

Washington,s Stephen Davis vs Ram  Defense?? As is so often the case, the
Redskins could be forced to abandon their running game if the Rams jump out
early.? Washington would dearly love  to establish Stephen Davis on the
ground but they may not be able to if they,re  forced to play catchup.? The
Rams  rate # 15 over the last four weeks in rushing yards allowed per game.?
For the year, they check in at # 23 in  Fantasy Points allowed to the
opposing RB.?  Even with Bud Carson helping coach the defense, they can be
run  upon.?

Atlanta,s Jamal Anderson vs 49er  Defense?? Jamal Anderson continues to make
solid improvement and he seems close to his 1998 form to me.? He,ll face a
49er Defense that can  definitely be run on.? Over the last  four weeks, they
rate # 14 in rushing yards allowed per game but for the year,  they rank # 29
in Fantasy Points allowed to the opposing RB.? Not unlike the situation with
Washington, the running back,s success largely hinges on the ability of the
defense to hang tough.? Anderson can  be taken out of the game if the Falcons
can,t hold Jeff Garcia and company down  in the passing game.???

Minnesota,s Robert Smith vs Panther  Defense? I,ve said for years I,d love to
see  Robert Smith play a full season and now we,re seeing that could look
like.? He,s having a great year and I think  he,ll continue to have success
against Carolina.? They,ve been pretty strong lately  against the rush
ranking # 11 in rushing yards allowed per game over the last  four weeks but
for the year, they rank # 24 in Fantasy Points allowed to the  opposing RB.?
If the Vikings can  control Carolina,s Steve Beuerlein (no small feat), it,ll
help Smith,s chances  immensely.

??

Downside Matchups:? These games favor the  Defense

Jacksonville,s  Fred Taylor vs Steeler Defense?? Fred Taylor is beginning to
work  his way out most Fantasy GM,s dog house as he continues to be a bright
spot on a  team without many bright spots.?  He,s been running hard but this
will be a real gut check for him as he  squares off against a very tough
Steeler rush defense that,s only allowed 2 TDs  over the last four games.?
Pittsburgh ranks # 3 for the year in Fantasy Points allowed to the  opposing
RB and Taylor will have his hands  full.

Carolina,s  Tshimanga Biakubutuka vs Viking Defense?? Biakabutuka remains
very  questionable with a bad toe and the Panthers don,t sound very
optimistic about  him playing Sunday.? Keep an eye on  it as he was able to
play through the pain last week.? Although it seems to be worse this week
than last.? If he can,t go, you,ll  see undrafted rookie FB Brad Hoover get
the start.? Don,t ask me how that happens.? Minnesota is decent against the
run  ranking # 12 over the last four games in rushing yards allowed per game
and # 17  for the year in Fantasy Points allowed to the opposing  RB.

Tampa Bay,s  Warrick Dunn / Mike Alstott vs Bear Defense?? Most people
including myself  thought new offensive coordinator Les Steckel would involve
Mike Alstott more in  Frank Wycheck type roles.? Hasn,t  happened yet but it,
ll be interesting to see if they start getting the big guy  the balls in
creative ways.? I,m  sure his fumbling problems are still a huge concern but
of course that,s not  something a guy like Tony Dungy talks very publicly
about.? The Bears are decent against the run  ranking # 9 over the last four
weeks in rushing yards allowed per game but for  the year, they check in at #
21 in Fantasy Points allowed to the opposing  RB.?

Denver,s  Terrell Davis vs Charger Defense??  Davis scared everyone this week
when it was reported he had a problem  with his calf.? He says it,s
overblown and was calling it just &tightness8 below the knee. ?He,ll need to
be as healthy as possible  this week as the Chargers have been playing strong
rush defense of late ranking  # 2 in rushing yards  allowed per game over the
last four weeks.? For the year, they,re still ranked # 15  in Fantasy Points
allowed to the opposing RB reflecting some of their earlier  struggles.? The
Broncos desperately  need Davis to shoulder the load with Brian Griese out
and it,ll be interesting  to see how he responds.? It,s a  tough matchup, but
I bet he does well.

St. Louis, Justin  Watson vs Redskin Defense?? The good news for Watson is
that  he doesn,t have to worry about Trung Canidate.? The bad news is Robert
Holcomb saw a  good bit of work at tailback this week and Marshall Faulk is
even making noise  about playing Monday.? Faulk did  practice some Thursday
but coach Mike Martz still remains pessimistic about him  seeing much action
this week.? Keep  an eye on it as I,m sure it,ll be a top story but right
now, he doesn,t look to  be a big factor.? The Redskin rush  defense is solid
ranking # 8 over the last four weeks in rushing yards allowed  per game and #
6 for the year in Fantasy Points allowed to the opposing  RB.

??

Defensive Slam Dunks:? These  games heavily favor the Defense?

Cleveland,s Travis Prentice / Jamel  White vs Titan Defense?  ?The Browns
catch Tennessee at an awful  time as the Titans are coming off a frustrating
loss at home to Baltimore and  will likely be looking to vent some
frustrations this week.? Cleveland looks to bear the brunt of  that
situation.? Prentice and White  have been unexceptional lately and I don,t
see them improving against a tough  Titan Defense.? Over the last four
weeks, Tennessee ranks # 7 in rushing yards allowed per game.? They also rank
# 7 for the year in  Fantasy Points allowed to the opposing RB.?  These guys
may do in a pinch on other weeks but I don,t see it this  Sunday.?

Detroit,s James Stewart vs Giant  Defense?? Stewart is still a starter in
many  leagues but I don,t like his matchup here.?  (Although you can,t
discount the time he ran wild on Tampa Bay with an  awful matchup too)? The
Giants rank  # 1 for the year in Fantasy Points allowed to the opposing RB.?
For the last four weeks, they rank # 6  in rushing yards allowed per game.?
That,s strong.? Having a  healthy Jason Sehorn back will help the entire
defense as it allows more safety  help to commit to the run.?

Oakland,s Napoleon Kaufman vs Saints  Defense?? Keep an eye on it, but at
this  point Tyrone Wheatley is looking very questionable with not one but two
bad  ankle sprains.? His most recent  sprain is thought to be worse than the
first sprain on the other ankle that was  limiting him already.? Kaufman
struggles a bit as the sole RB and Saints are RB Killers.? For the year, they
rank # 4 in Fantasy  Points allowed to the opposing RB and over the last four
games, they check in at  # 5 in rushing yards allowed per game.?  One ray of
hope for Oakland is that DT Norman Hand is questionable with  bone chips in
his ankle although they believe he can play even though he hasn,t  practiced
this week.?

Kansas  City,s RB committee vs Bills Defense??  By now you probably know
better than to risk starting any RB wearing a  Chief uniform.? This week,s a
good  week to follow that rule as the Bills are playing excellent rush
defense.? They rank # 4 over the last four weeks  in rushing yards allowed
per game and the rate # 5 for the year in Fantasy Points allowed to the
opposing RB.? I shy  away from Chief RBs against any team but especially a
defense this tough.? If you don,t have any choice, Kimble  Anders will get
the &start8 but expect to see plenty of Tony Richardson and  Frank Moreau.?
Richardson in  particular does a nice job receiving the ball.?

Dallas,  Emmitt Smith vs Raven Defense?? Let,s put it this way:? Smith was
shut down by Cincinnati last  week.? And the Ravens are a just a  tad bit
better than the Bengals when it comes to run defense.? If anyone can bounce
back, it,s Smith  but last Sunday was very worrisome.?  The Ravens are flying
high after a huge road win at Tennessee.? He,s still a solid RB but Smith
will  have his hands more than full Sunday.?  The Ravens rank # 3 in rushing
yards allowed per  game over the last four weeks and for the year they rate #
2  in Fantasy Points  allowed to the opposing RB.?

New York  Jets, Curtis Martin vs Dolphin Defense? I don,t  see a repeat of
the week 8 meltdown from Miami on defense.? Martin will have a tough day
ahead of  him against the Dolphin defense that ranks # 10 over the last four
weeks  in rushing yards allowed  per game.? Over the  season, they rank # 8
in  Fantasy Points allowed to the opposing RB.? The Dolphins were hopeful LB
Zach Thomas  could return but that,s not looking too likely now.? It,ll be
even tougher for Martin if he  does.?

New Orleans  Jerald Moore / Chad Morton vs Raider Defense??  New Orleans
catches a tough break as the new RBs are forced to make their  first start
facing the # 1 rush defense in rushing yards allowed per  game over the last
four weeks.? For the year, they,re not quite as tough  ranking # 12 in
Fantasy  Points allowed to the opposing RB.? It,s tough to call right now how
the  carries will be distributed as the Saints are understandably being
tight  lipped.? I expect Moore to carry  most of the load to begin with.?
He,s the more physical back and much more like Williams than is Morton  who
falls closer to the scat back / 3rd down guy mold.? I can envision something
similar to the  rotation New England is using with J.R. Redmond and Kevin
Faulk.? For FF purposes, you,d of course like to  see one guy take over but I
don,t see that now.? The other wild card is newly signed  Terry Allen who
sounds excited about football again.? We,ll see how quickly he can get
comfortable.?

?

?

?

?

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Phil Lowry/Britt Davis - Three Allen Center

Date:		4/17/2001
Time:		3:00 PM - 4:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description: