Mark,

I am not sure I follow this but I will attempt to present my interpretation
of your note.

I am only restrained from trading those items in clause one if I am
responsible for trading them at Enron, and "equities" falls under
"securities" in clause one.
"Equities" fall under clause one and are therefore not included in clause
two. Therefore, since I do not trade equities for Enron, I can trade them on
my personal account.

Brent Crude futures, I would argue, are "financial instruments," included in
clause one. I am not responsible for trading them for Enron. If they fall
under clause one they are not included in clause two. Does this mean, since
they are not in clause two and I do not trade them for Enron, I can trade
them on my personal account?

Perhaps you could give me a call, +44 207 783 4928.

Thank you,

Dave

From: Mark Taylor on 10/11/2000 15:56 CST
To: Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: David Redmond/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter
Crilly/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: issue w/compliance ertificate

This issue was much easier when all we traded were energy commodities,
interest rates and currencies. The older versions of the policy provided that
no Enron employee may trade any energy commodity for the account of anyone
other than Enron.  Beyond that, no Enron employee could trade a commodity
which was within their area of responsibility.  For example, I was not
permitted to trade natural gas futures for my own account but, since interest
rates and currencies are not within my area of responsibility, I could trade
them.  As the scope of our trading activities expanded it became more
difficult to identify the scope of the company's concern, much less to
articulate it.  We did however take a stab at it and the result is below.
This may be an area which could stand some clarification in the next version
of the Policy.

For now, I would suggest that the term "security" highlighted below should be
read to include equities and therefore not one of the commodities covered in
the second numbered clause (i.e. the word "other" refers to items other than
those listed in clause (i)).  The result is that an Enron employee who does
not trade financial instruments, securities, financial assets or liabilities
for Enron may trade them for his or her own personal account.  To take this a
step further, one could argue that an employee who trades the equities of
energy companies for Enron should not trade energy company equities for his
or her own account but could trade other equities - if it were me, I would
certainly make sure that Ted Murphy agreed with my analysis before I did it.
Of course, a wide variety of commodities remain clearly off limits for
personal trading - metals, ag commodities, bandwidth, freight, lumber, among
many others - for all employees.  As I remember it, this was done purposely
and if anyone disagrees with the scope of the policy they would be wise to
discuss the matter with the RAC Group as they make suggestions for Policy
revisions to the Enron Corp. board.

Employee Trading.  No employee of any Enron Business Unit may engage in the
trading of any Position for the benefit of any party other than an Enron
Business Unit (whether for their own account or for the account of any third
party) where such Position relates to (i) any financial instrument, security,
financial asset or liability which falls within such employee,s
responsibility at an Enron Business Unit or (ii) any other commodity,
included in any Commodity Group.

	Cassandra Schultz@ENRON
	11/08/2000 08:32 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: David Redmond/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter
Crilly/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: issue w/compliance ertificate

To: Mark Taylor,  Legal counsel for Market Risk Management

Mark - would you please clarify this issue for us?

Thank you,
Cassandra Schultz.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron on 11/08/2000
08:26 AM ---------------------------

David Redmond@ECT
11/08/2000 03:05 AM
To: Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Araceli Romero/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter
Crilly/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: 3rd Request - RESPONSE NEEDED ASAP - Risk Mgmt. Compliance
Certificate

Cassandra,

Richard asked me to review this document before the traders on the UK Gas
Desk would sign it.

The UK gas desk adheres to all the risk management requirements of this
document. However, in Section VII , Miscellaneous, Employee Trading, the
document would appear to prevent any of us trading equities (amongst other
commodities) on our personal account as Equity Trading is a Commodity Group.
We are unsure if this is the aim of this agreement.

We have asked our compliance officer, Paul Simons to clarify the impact of
this clause for us.

We are not ignoring the document, we are waiting for clarification.

Thank you,

David Redmond


Jeff, here it is.  Take a look and if you have any questions, I'll be
prepared to address them promptly so you can send this off.


Mr. DDDDDDDDDDDDerivative:

When do you want to move this guaranty along?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/01/2000 12:05
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
11/29/2000 09:06 AM
To: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
cc:

Subject: Enron South America consent to assignment

Here's the draft form I received this am.

Look forward to talking to you later.

Kay


Per my message, here is the info on those mappings

Meter #        Current Trade Zone       Current Curve Mapping      New Trade
Zone      New Curve Mapping

1009            14            IF-THOMPSONVILLE           11
IF-CORPUS
1175             5   IF-AGUA DULCE           11
IF-CORPUS

Please change both Intramonth and Mid Mkt mappings.

Thanks,

Eric

3-0977


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000 10:08 AM -----

	Parking & Transportation
	06/13/2000 09:57 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Parking & Transportation/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Parking Receipt for Benefit Purpose

This document will serve as a receipt for $89.00 paid in the month of June
for Parking.  The receipt is issued by Enron Property and Services, Parking
and Transportation Desk to ST. CLAIR,CAROL L, Social Security Number
*********.  The company subsidy paid for the month of June is $50.00.


CP01-115	Red Rock Expansion - Section 7(b)/7(c) application requesting permission and approval to:  (1) abandon in-place existing units totaling 49,500 HP at Transwestern's Stations 1, 2, 3 & 4 and (2) install a 41,500 HP unit at each station resulting in 150,000 Mcf/d of incremental firm capacity from Thoreau to the California border.  Requested expedited treatment with an Order issued by August 1, 2001.  On April 11, 2001 filed photographs of station yards, additional agency correspondence including Cultural Resource Survey for Station 3, and an updated landowner listing.  Also provided clarification per FERC request that no aquifers would be affected by the project and the new and existing units would not operate simultaneously during the six-month transition period after the installation of the new units.  On April 20, 2001 filed Cultural Resource Survey for Station 4, "no effect" USFWL clearance for Stations 1 and 2, and revised noise analysis reports incorporating the power generators at Stations 3 and 4.   On April 23, 2001, filed clearance from the Navajo Nation Department of Archaeology for Station 3.  On May 9, 2001, filed SHPO approval contingent upon avoidance of site identified at Station 1 and correspondence from Navajo Nation Archaeology Department stating they are waiting for internal documentation before issuing a clearance letter.  Filed NNAD approval for Station 4 on May 14.  Firm transportation agreements representing 84,200 Dth will be filed with FERC on June 18, 2001.  Additional firm agreements for 22,500 Dth were filed on July 3, 2001.  This brings the total subscribed capacity to 106,700 Dth.  On July 9, 2001, per FERC request, filed schedule showing the daily deliveries to SoCal Needles from April 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001.  Filed Affirmative Statement pursuant to condition of the order on July 27, 2001.
  			Filed:	03/29/2001
			Certificate Issued:	07/16/2001  96 FERC ? 61,078 (2001)
			Certificate Accepted:	07/19/2001
Regulatory Contact:  Donna


Here is everything that you requested.  The Sierra Pacific chart is in the PG&E document.  As far as the origination diagrams, I redid the physical chart, but for the paper chart, I need for you to look it over and I will make the necessary corrections.  Have a great weekend!
Mara

-----Original Message-----
From: Tycholiz, Barry
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:08 PM
To: Bronstein, Mara
Subject: sierra pacific

mara. send me via e-mail the sierra pacific charts.. and also the flow charts on booking deals.

bt


Good Morning!

Bottom line: No Changes.

For the near term (1-5), we see some cool anomalies arriving into the Dakotas by Monday already, with highs in the Dakotas in the mid-30s and lows in the mid-teens.By Tuesday, Texas and the Midwest will be in the below normal category, with Dallas overnights in the mid-30s (normal low 43), Houston's low in the mid-40s (normal upper-40s) and Chicago will freeze, with a mid-20 overnight.  Progressing into the Northeast by wednesday, Philly and New York will get into the below normal category, but 5 or 6 degree anomalies are most likely.  Looks like a three day event as it moves easterly and then is followed by moderation into the...

6-10 Day time period, which will see a cool shot over the Midwest/East towards next weekend, moderating again by early the following week. Then, early in the...

11-15 Day time period, more cool air moves in, beginning with central cooling, then even into the Southeast.

So, with normals dropping across the nation, this first cool air anomaly event arriving in the Midwest by Tuesday will elevate the nation's gas demand requirements into the 60 Bcf/d plus regime from here on through the winter.  Here's the strip beginning with today:

Sat 	11/17	47 Bcfd
Sun	11/18	52 Bcfd
Mon	11/19	55 Bcfd
Tue	11/20	67 Bcfd
Wed	11/21	69 Bcfd
Thu	11/22	65 Bcfd
Fri	11/23	65 Bcfd
Sat	11/24	63 Bcfd
Sun	11/25	63 Bcfd
Mon	11/26	65 Bcfd
Tue	11/27	65 Bcfd

Till tomorrow,

The Weather Team


----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2001 04:26 PM -----

	Stacey Dempsey@ENRON
	03/13/2001 04:22 PM

		 To: Stacey Dempsey/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: (bcc: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: MSN DSL pilot survey

1. The ordering process was easy:
  Yes
  No

If you answer "No" to the question above, please give comment:

2. How long was the actual installation date set from the ordering date?
  less than 1 week
  1 to 2 weeks
  2 to 3 weeks
  3 to 4 weeks
  4 to 5 weeks
  5 to 6 weeks
  more than 6 weeks

3. Was the internet connection installed when promised?
  Yes
  No

4. Was the internet service provider installation performed to your
satisfaction?    Yes
  No

If you answer "No" to the question above, please give comment:

5. Did the installer leave your premise without damage?
  Yes
  No

If you answer "No" to the question above, please give comment:

6. Did the installer leave your personal belongings in tact?
  Yes
  No

If you answer "No" to the question above, please give comment:

7. Were additional charges required of you?
  Yes, please specify what is the additional charge.
  No

8. Have you received your internet service bill ?
  Yes
  No

9.  Was your internet service bill accurate?
Yes
No


I finally got my film developed - this gives you an idea of how often I use
the camera - and thought you might like these.  Unfortunately the only shot
on the roll of Bruce didn't turn out - directly attributable to the
photographer's lack of skill - and we never did have anybody take a group
shot.  There were several others that you can tell would have been great
shots if my thumb hadn't half obscured the lens.  The sunset was taken during
our last night there while you guys were swimming off in the direction the
picture was taken (if you listen carefully, you can almost hear Ted losing
his lunch down below).

Hope you guys are well - any trips to Houston on the agenda?

Mark


Wow!!!
Sounds great!!
It matches my interest exactly,
I really like it..

I'll send you an email after I talk with
my advisor tomorrow.

However I wonder
what will happen to work with DealBench team
if I join the project?

thanks for your quick response.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jinbaek Kim
Ph.D Candidate
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
U.C.Berkeley
http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek

Go Bears!

      :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
     :      a   a      :                 __....._
     :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
      :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
       `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
        : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
        `.   '"'                                   ;
         `.               '                        ;
          `.     `        :           `            ;
           .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
         .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
     __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
   .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
   `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
         `.......-'                 `........'

On Wed, 2 May 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:

>
> Jinbaek,
>
> This is a project related to automated trading platforms for commodities.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
> Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 05/02/2001 05:21:40 PM
>
> To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: summer work..
>
>
> Dr. Kaminski,
> thanks for your mail.
>
> I am sorry that I'll not be available earlier,
> I will talk with my advisor, but
> probably it will be pretty negative.
> however, I may be able to start it from June1,
> depending on what he tells..
> We will meet tomorrow afternoon,
> so I'll be able to let you know
> whether we can start work earlier then.
>
> And could you tell me briefly
> what are those projects you have in mind?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jinbaek Kim
> Ph.D Candidate
> Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
> U.C.Berkeley
> http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek
>
> Go Bears!
>
>       :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
>      :      a   a      :                 __....._
>      :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
>       :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
>        `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
>         : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
>         `.   '"'                                   ;
>          `.               '                        ;
>           `.     `        :           `            ;
>            .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
>          .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
>      __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
>    .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
>    `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
>          `.......-'                 `........'
>
>
> On Wed, 2 May 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
>
> >
> > Jinbaek,
> >
> > Thanks for your message.
> >
> > We have a number of additional  fascinating projects that you can work
> > on.  As a matter of fact, it would be great to have you here earlier.
> >
> > Vince
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Jinbaek Kim" <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 05/02/2001 05:18:32 AM
> >
> > To:   <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>, "Raghavan, Suresh"
> >       <Suresh.Raghavan@ENRON.com>, "Mesquita, Ross"
> >       <Ross.Mesquita@ENRON.com>
> > cc:   <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu>
> > Subject:  summer work..
> >
> >
> > Long time no see,
> > How have you been...must be busy and living a challenging life?
> > I have been pretty busy too,
> > to finish a project and write a paper, these days.
> >
> > Everything looks going OK for my summer internship.
> > I took necessary steps to work out of campus, and sent
> > signed contract to Molly a week ago..
> >
> > Here is what I am expecting to do in the summer.
> > Please let me know if you have any change in mind.
> > Actually, I wonder a little bit if DealBench changed its business
> model...
> > and maybe you got priority in something different
> > because it has been quite a while since we talked.
> > I'd like to what's going on in DealBench team...
> > Raghavan and Ross,
> > if we talk over phone it will be great!
> >
> > Dr. Kaminski,
> > If you think there is something else interesting to work with during the
> > summer,
> > to both you and I, please let me know.
> > My interest is auction, market design, and simulation.
> > I am taking a financial engineering class, (mostly on option pricing)
> > and working on electricity generator valuation problem based on
> > spark spread option.
> >
> > All of you,
> > Let's keep in touch until we meet in June!!
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Jinbaek
> >
> >
> > Tentative Work Period: 6/4 - 8/4
> >
> > 1. Tasks:
> > 1) Survey on Auctions: the State of Art
> > Single-item auction, Multi-Unit auction, Sequential auction,
> > Multi-attribute auction, Combinatorial auction
> >
> >      - Theoretical
> >      - Experimental
> >      - Algorithmical
> >
> > 2) Deal Bench's Auction Model Analysis
> >
> > 2. Deliverables:
> > 1) 3 Presentations:
> >      - 1st presentation: around 6/30: on different auction types and
> > researches
> >      - 2nd presentation: around 7/15: the State of Art in auction studies
> >      - 3rd presentation: around 8/1: Deal bench's model analysis
> >
> > 2) Report:
> > Summary of auction study in laymen's term
> > Deal bench's model analysis
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>


Friday, March 10 works for my group.

Sally - Can we make sure all other groups can be done by Friday as well?  We
really need to get this completed and I don't want to see Operations being a
bottleneck in this process.

Kim Melodick
03/07/2000 05:24 PM
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen P
Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvonne
Laing/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOPS salary survey questionnaire

We will need to establish a deadline.  Will Friday March 10th work?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2000 05:14
PM ---------------------------

Kim Melodick
02/18/2000 05:34 PM
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen P
Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvonne
Laing/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOPS salary survey questionnaire

Attached you will find the salary survey questionnaire for your review.  You
will need to fill out the questionnaire for each exempt job group in your
department.  Please be as specific as possible to ensure we are capturing all
the skills needed to accurately price the job.  If you have filled out the
questionnaire in the past, you may want to update the information.  I will be
happy to address any questions you have regarding the form.


I just rely on the market services folks to do the right thing.  Tell me if
you think this is yet another area in which I have too much faith in our
business people.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           01/14/2000 08:35 AM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: MARKETING AFFILIATE RULE: Standard L: Notice No. 11

Who follows up to make sure these changes get made?  Do you guys call market
services or do we just rely on them to respond to these Frazier-grams?  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/14/2000
08:34 AM ---------------------------

Frazier King
01/13/2000 05:27 PM
To: Kim Perez/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Nancy Bastida/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Georgi
Landau/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Geneva Hiroms/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@Enron, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Bambi
Heckerman/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON,
Margert_Morton@Sonat.com, Dennis Lee/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Zuela
Carter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob M Hall/FGT/Enron@Enron, Patricia
Steele/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Sheila
Nacey/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dari
Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Toby Kuehl/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: MARKETING AFFILIATE RULE: Standard L: Notice No. 11

Please open and read the attached "Mkt Aff Memo11" which gives you notice of
the addition of a new company--Bridgeline Holding, L.P.--to the "Exempt
Marketing Affiliate" category of the Enron Pipeline list of "Potential
Marketing Affiliates".  The notice is effective today, the date of formation
of the new company. Standard L of the Marketing Affiliate Rules REQUIRES
POSTING OF ANY CHANGES TO MARKETING AFFILIATES WITHIN THREE DAYS.  This means
that you must add the name and address of this new companies to the the list
of marketing affiliates posted on your respective pipeline's EBB WITHIN THREE
DAYS OF THE COMMENCEMENT OF A TRANSPORTATION TRANSACTION IN WHICH THE COMPANY
IS INVOLVED.

Also, please open the attached "Mkt Aff List11" which is the Eleventh Revised
list of all "Potential Enron Marketing Affiliates".  This list has been
revised to include Bridgeline Holding, L.P.  Keep it in mind that if any of
these affiliates commences or ceases involvment in a transportation
transaction on your pipeline, the company name and address must be
respectively added or deleted from the posting on your pipeline's web site
WITHIN THREE DAYS.  This listing will be revised and sent to you immediately
when there is a change in the list.

Finally, note that affiliated companies which are exempt from being
classified as marketing affiliates are included at the end of the list.  If
any of these companies proposes to transport on your respective Enron
pipeline, please check with your Legal Contact to make sure the exemption is
still in effect.

Individuals listed on the Distribution List of the attached memo
are requested to acknowledge receipt.


Here are the drafts of the agreement and confirm for your review.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 6:38 AM
To:	DL-ETS Gas Controllers; Giambrone, Laura; Hernandez, Bert; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Ward, Linda
Subject:	FW: Gallup Compressor

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jolly, Rich
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:07 PM
To:	Lowry, Phil
Cc:	Harris, Steven; Rice, Randy; Stephens, LD; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Watson, Kimberly; Smith, Rick; Roensch, David; McCracken, Mike; Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Keller, John R.; Maestas, Gary; Gallup, Team; Gallup-Sta5, Team; Gallup-Sta4, Team
Subject:	Re: Gallup Compressor

Phil I just got off the phone with Arnold and we have been advised that in the morning around 5 o'clock eastern time is the earliest that Alstrom will have information for us. From talking with Arnold, Alstrom has to get permission from England before they can give us approval to pull the unit. Since the unit is still under warranty we'll need to wait on directions from Alstrom. The team is doing more testing with Alstrom during this time to try and figure out how much damage the unit has.

We do have Norm Spalding's group lining up a contractor to assist in pulling the unit and transporting it for us. I'll keep everyone undated as soon as we get more information.

Thanks
Rich

Rich Jolly
08/22/2001 04:38 AM
To:	Steven Harris/Enron@EnronXGate, Phil Lowry/Enron@EnronXGate, Randy Rice/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:	LD Stephens/Enron@EnronXGate, Darrell Schoolcraft/Enron@EnronXGate, Kimberly Watson/Enron@EnronXGate, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Gallup Compressor

Steve here's where we are on the Gallup Compressor. Part of the stator is damaged and we're not sure if it can be repaired in place at this time. This will be decided sometime this morning and I'll let you know. If the stator cannot be repaired in place it will have to be pulled and returned to the factory. If this happens we'll be down for (I'm guessing on this) but from past experience it will be two weeks or more. I'll be at the Gallup site this morning.

Thanks
Rich

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


?
Subject: Click and go to http://www.enerfax.com if can not view  properly

?
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
																					[IMAGE]

													[IMAGE]

																	Enerfax Daily

																												[IMAGE]
																												[IMAGE]
																										[IMAGE]

																								Enerfax  Daily? -? Page  ? -? November 7,  2000? -? ? Need a  Past Issue
-Click Here

																																[IMAGE]

																							Enerfax  Daily? -? Page  ? -? November 7, 2000

																								[IMAGE]

																											New  Pipeline Interconnection to Offer Canadian Supply

																											?  ? Empire State Pipeline and the National Fuel Gas have  completed a new
Canadian pipeline interconnection at Pendleton, NY,  allowing natural gas to
flow to the US from Canada. The volumes from  Canada could flow to the
Buffalo area market as well as to NFG's  interconnects with Tennessee Gas
Pipeline in East Aurora, NY and  Ellisburg, PA; Dominion Transmission in
Ellisburg; and  Transcontinental Pipeline and TETCO at Leidy. Empire Pipeline
is  owned by ANR and Westcoast Energy's St. Clair Pipelines. ANR  Pipeline
serves as the physical operator for Empire Pipeline, which  extends for about
156 miles from Buffalo to Syracuse. Most of the  natural gas will come from
Western Canada, and the new pipeline will  give more flexibility and supply
options for Empire's shippers.

																													[IMAGE]

																									[IMAGE]
															[IMAGE]

																										[IMAGE]

																																	[IMAGE]
																												[IMAGE]

																														Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 5? -?  November 7, 2000

																															[IMAGE]

																									[IMAGE]
																									[IMAGE]

																									Natural Gas - NYMEX Reportable Positions as of  10/31/00?

																									? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ?
? ? ?  ?Nonreportable
																									Non-Commercial?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ?
Commercial? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ?Total? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ?Positions______
																									Long? ? |  Short? ? ?Spreading? ? ? ?  ? |Long? ? ? ? ?|
Short?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  | Long? ? ? ? ?| Short? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|
Long?  ? ? ? | Short?
																									7,039? ?  ?5,943? ? ? ?78,522? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ?431,107? ?  ?
447,203? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? 516,669? ? ? 531,668? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ?39,178? ?  ?
24,178 Changes From 10/24/00 (Change In Open Interest:  -38,886)
																									-5,407? ? ? ?44? ?  ? ? ?-7,144? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ?-23,577? ? ?
-30,509? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ?-36,128? ? ? ?-37,609?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -2,758?  ? ?
-1,277
																									Percent of Open Interest for Each  Category of Traders
																									1.3%? ? ?  ?1.1%? ? ? ? 14.1%? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 77.6%?  ? ? ?
80.5%? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? 93.0%? ?  ? ? ?95.7%? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ?
7.0%? ? ?  ? 4.3% Number Of Traders In Each Category (Total Traders:  156)
																									? ? ?37? ? ? ?  24? ? ? ? ? ? ?43?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ?90? ? ? ? ?  ? ?
83? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ?145? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ?134
																									(10,000
Mmbtu's)? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ?Open Interest: 555,846

																									[IMAGE]

																									[IMAGE]

																										Rotary Rig Counts Down

																										?  ? The number of rigs exploring for oil and natural gas in North  America
fell by 8 for the week ending November 3rd, according to  Baker Hughes. The
number of rigs operating in the US fell by 6 to  763 to 1,078 compared to 763
a year ago. The number of rigs in  Canada fell by 2 to 362, compared with
last year's 336. In the Gulf  of Mexico, the number of rigs searching for oil
and natural gas fell  by 3 to 148 compared to 113 last year. The number of US
rigs  searching for oil rose by 4 to 232, while the number searching for
natural gas fell by 10 to 845. The number of US rigs exploring on  land fell
5 to 906, while the number operating offshore fell by 3 to  152. The number
in inland waters rose by 2 to 20.? There were  250 US rigs exploring
directionally, 68 exploring horizontally, and  760 exploring vertically. The
weekly rig count reflects the number  of rigs exploring for oil and natural
gas, not those producing.

																																[IMAGE]

																																Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 6? -?  November 7, 2000

																															[IMAGE]

																															[IMAGE]

																															Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 7? -?  November 7, 2000

																													[IMAGE]

																									PG&E to Acquire Mississippi Power  Plant

																									?  ? PG&E's National Energy Group plans to acquire the rights  to the total
power generating capacity of an 810 MW natural gas  fueled, combined cycle
power plant in Mississippi operated by  Cogentrix Energy's? Southaven Power.
The generating capacity  will be acquired by PG&E Energy Trading under a
long-term  agreement. Terms were not disclosed.

																														[IMAGE]

																										Financial Summary

																																[IMAGE]

																						")} TC
																			[IMAGE]

 - blnk.gif
 - img17.gif
 - img18.gif
 - img19.gif
 - img20.gif
 - img21.gif
 - img22.gif
 - img12.gif
 - img23.gif
 - img24.gif
 - img25.gif
 - img9.gif
 - img26.gif
 - img27.gif
 - img28.gif
 - img29.gif
 - img30.gif
 - img31.gif
 - img32.gif
 - id=1381847
 - img33.gif


Jim--Attached per Dick Ingersoll's request is a description of the discussion
yesterday for your inclusion in the minutes.  Thank you.
Christi Nicolay 713-853-7007


Mr. Vincent J. Kaminski
Managing Director
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

Dear Mr. Kaminski:

Powerful new forces are transforming the North American gas and power
industry, bringing considerable volatility and uncertainty to investment
and strategy. Questions relating to prices, security, geopolitics, the
global economy, and environmental concerns are forcing reconsideration
of basic assumptions and plans.

To address these questions and concerns, Cambridge Energy Research
Associates (CERA) announces a timely new multiclient study, "New
Realities, New Risks: North American Power and Gas 2020."

In an online interview CERA Senior Director Lawrence J. Makovich
presents a brief overview of major issues to be addressed in the study.
To hear more information about the study, please access the interview on
our website at http://www.cera.com/mc?c=2804&p=1044 .

Using CERA's scenario planning methodology, "New Realities, New Risks"
will present plausible alternate paths to the future of power and gas
markets in North America over the next 20 years. The Study will provide
useful tools for evaluating corporate strategies and investments as well
as an integrated assessment of gas and power market analyses.

The study will address key issues including
*What levels of gas and power prices are sustainable?
*How will the current wave of power plant and gas pipeline
infrastructure development shift North American energy dynamics?
*What opportunities, risks and challenges face those involved in the
industry?
*How will technological developments affect future gas and power
markets?
*Will the role of government expand or contract in the energy industry?
*What will be the cost and value of increased energy security?
*Who will be the winners and losers in each scenario?

For complete details of the study, including deliverables and proposed
study content, please visit our website at
http://www.cera.com/offerings/details/1,1504,CID2299,00.html.

In the traditional CERA format, the study will start with a kick-off
workshop. Exclusively hosted for study participants(*), the kick-off
workshop will take place in early January at a location to be announced.

To obtain your confidential study prospectus, please contact Noelle
Hernandez-Bullrich at nhernandez@cera.com or via phone at +1 617 498
9148.
You may also contact Ron Kapavik at rkapavik@cera.com or via phone at +1
617 441 2629 with any specific questions you have about the study.

Thank you for your consideration, and we look forward to your
participation in this study.

Sincerely,

Noelle Hernandez-Bullrich
Associate, North American Energy

(*) Special discount for enrollment in the Study prior to December 31st.

************************************************************
Our relationship with you is very important to us.  Should you
prefer not to receive e-mail notifications from CERA, please send
a reply to this message with "DoNotEmail" as the subject line of
your message. ( mailto:info@cera.com?subject=DoNotEmail )
************************************************************


Just to remind you I am on vacation Thurs and Fri.

GFI requested a quote for NA Gas and Power, Coal, Emmisions, UK Power, UK
Gas, European Gas and European Power.  I have calls into George McClellan
(coal) and Tim Belden (West Power) to let them know about the negotiations.
I need to know who at Enron you have discussed this with in London to make
sure I run it past other interested parties in London prior to making an
offer to GFI.  I am now talking to one of the GFI Managing Directors in New
York and hopefully this will move the process along faster.

Amerex: Unwound $500 K / 75 % brokerage deal.  Asked them for a proposal for
zero brokerage.  Original offer we made was $400 k and zero brokerage.
Meeting schedules for Tuesday afternoon. Still waiting for John Nowlan to
reply on crude products and Marcello Romano to reply on European Bandwidth.

PVM: European Crude broker presented by Chris Glass; Forwarding NDA

ED&F Man: Waiting on Mary.  I will call if OK with you.

Prebon: Mike made initial offer with brokerage in it.  Mike informed Prebon
of new price structure. Prebon to call back on Monday.

Natsource: Jack is waiting on a draft of the Agreements to begin
discussions.  I will forward the Agreements once we approve.  I suspect early
next week.

Credit: Working with Debbie on security level versus headroom.  Modeling June
2000 to get feel of exposure.

Legal: Second draft of BETA is attached.  Bullet points for Fee Agreement are
also attached.  Liquidated damages and margining are covered in Section 3(f)
and (g)


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Brandon Stokes <bstokes@organic.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Brandon+20Stokes+20+3Cbstokes+40organic+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 7:28 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	Mutual NDA

Tana,

Thank you for working with us to get the Mutual NDA expedited.  Our meeting
next Tuesday in Houston will be far more productive with both sides open to
discussing all the challenges ahead.

Attached is the agreement that Enron N.A. worked up with Organic the last
time we met. It is a departure from our standard form and did go through
numerous revisions before being executed.

I'm in town all week so please don't hesitate to call or email me direct.

Thanks again for your help,
Brandon.
 - M_NDA specialv5.2.00.doc

Brandon L. Stokes
Director Business Development
Organic Inc.
601 Townsend Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
(415) 581-5667          office
(310) 890-4594          mobile
3108904594@mobile.att.net       mobile text
blstokes@organic.com    emailwww.organic.com


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2001
03:13 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Scott Earnest                           01/04/2001 07:25 PM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent Price
Subject: Jan 3 REVISED - One day and Five day Curve Shift Limits Revised

The V@R violation memo should state that the reason we had a violation was
the additional trading positions relating to the EOL 24 hr. trading
activity.  There is currently a memo requesting an additional $2mm of V@R on
Greg Whalley's desk.  This addtional V@R will be temporary until there are
Board approved limits for these trading positions.

Scott

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001 06:24
PM ---------------------------

Bradley Samuelson@ENRON
01/04/2001 05:00 PM
To: Cindy Horn/LON/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Fondren/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Homan Amiry/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Manfred
Roenz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Oliver
Gaylard/LON/ECT@ECT, Mary Thambiah/LON/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Buckner Thomas/LON/ECT@ECT, John Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, David J Botchlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hugo Moreira/LON/ECT@ECT,
Christian LeBroc/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joel Bennett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Jan 3 REVISED - One day and Five day Curve Shift Limits Revised


You crack me up!

	Russell Diamond
	08/28/2000 03:38 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: HQ Energy Services

Oh it's happened before, but after a brief depression period and some therapy
I was OK.

From: Tana Jones on 08/28/2000 03:33 PM
To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: HQ Energy Services

I can't believe a girl wouldn't call you back after a date...

	Russell Diamond
	08/28/2000 03:30 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: HQ Energy Services

Oh yeah, I always forget about the whole 'political' aspect, but it is an
important one............, and as far as a girl always hedging her
bets...........interesting I'll have to keep that one in mind next time I
don't get a call back from a date.

From: Tana Jones on 08/28/2000 03:21 PM
To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: HQ Energy Services

Don't you remember at Sara's party, we were talking to Bill, and telling him
how you were our favorite Credit person, and he said, "but I thought I was
your favorite Credit person...", and since he is your boss, it seems quite
political (for both you and me!) that he is always #1, anyway...a girl's
always got to hedge her bets...!!

	Russell Diamond
	08/28/2000 03:12 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: HQ Energy Services

(after Bill) ???????

From: Tana Jones on 08/28/2000 03:07 PM
To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: HQ Energy Services

There's a reason why you earned the title of "Favorite Credit Person (after
Bill)"...!

	Russell Diamond
	08/28/2000 02:46 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: HQ Energy Services

Tana,

Please see attached Credit W/S for HQ.

Thanks
Russell


I just saw the NYT article.  Nice job.  It's nicely positioned as an issue
about India's resolve to encourage foreign investment and live up to
contracts.


I don't get it.  What does she want to do?

	"Scott Laughlin" <scottwl@hotmail.com>
	11/17/2000 09:48 PM

		 To: jdasovic@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Jeff,

Cameron doens't want you to send that Grinch thing out to anyone. Not that
she would. She wants to edit it, and try to send it out all at once.
Whatever. I'm forced to tell you.

B.O.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Attached are the revised rules and website text, reflecting reduction of the
immediate EOL capacity product offerings to one.  Please review the revisions
and, if appropriate, cause the development activities to commence.

	Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON
	07/14/2000 01:58 PM

		 To: David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Capacity Generation Auction Timeline

David,

Atached please find the last Website Text draft. Please make the appropite
changes so it only reflects the one product we will auction.

Once again, I really appreciate your help.

Regards,

Leonardo Pacheco


How could I resist such an opportunity?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           09/28/2000 10:37 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Westinghouse Contract

Kay -

I hate to put you through dental surgery, but are you available to help vet
EE&CC's numbers with Brian Barto and Gavin Gaul?  Before I complete
negotiations with Westinghouse on LD's, I want to make sure the Yahoos'
understanding of the contract is correct.

Thanks,

Mitch


[IMAGE]

SFX Music / Houston Concert Update
3DTrans-Siberian

3DJust

Trans-Siberian Orchestra

December 20, 2000
Aerial Theater at Bayou Place
On-Sale Saturday, November 11 at 10am!=A0=A0
3DBuy

Pantera

with Soulfly and second opener TBD
- Due to band injury, the De= cember 8th show has been rescheduled for March
25
Astro Arena
On sale now!=A0=A0
3DBuy
Original tickets will be honored= !!!

=09

3DJust=

Steve Earle

with Matthew Ryan
Monday, November 13
Aerial Theater at Bayo= u Palace
On sale now!=A0=A0
3DBuy

Gregg Allman and Friends

Tuesday, November 14
Aerial Theater at Bayou Palace
On sale now!=A0=A0
3DBuy

Merle Haggard

with Cory Morrow
Wednesday, November 15
Aerial Theater at Ba= you Palace
On sale now!=A0=A0
3DBuy

Judy Tenuta presents Funny Gay Men

Brian Bradley / Bob Smith / Jason Stuart
Saturday, November 18Aerial Theater at Bayou Palace
On sale now!=A0=A0
3DBuy

Macy Gray

with Common and Black Eyed Peas
Sunday, November 19
Aerial T= heater at Bayou Palace
On sale now!=A0=A0
3DBuy

Jerry Jeff Walker

with Ray Wylie Hubbard
Friday, November 24, 2000
Aerial Thea= ter at Bayou Palace
On sale now!=A0=A0
3DBuy

Mark Farner of Grand Funk Railroad

with Edgar Winter
Saturday, November 25, 2000
Aerial Theater= at Bayou Palace
On sale now!=A0=A0
3DBuy

The Anger Management Tour with Limp Bizkit
Godsmack / DMX / Sinisstar
Wednesday, November 29, 2000
Comp= aq Center
On sale now!!=A0=A0
3DBuy

=09

All dates, act= s, and ticket prices are subject to change without notice. A
service charge is added to each ticket price.  All events are rai= n or shine.
=09

For the Aerial Theater's complete show schedule visit www.aerialtheater.com.

3DSFX.com

        =20 Terms and Conditions of Use. =A91999-2000 SFX Entertainment Inc=
. All rights reserved.


- kudlow100901.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT on 08/22/2000
02:51 PM ---------------------------

Jackie Young
08/22/2000 11:08 AM
To: Karen Lindley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Feedback Monitor Error - Meter 984132 - 1/99

Karen,

I've looked in POPS and on day 16 of January 1999, I see a total confirmed
volume of 61,365 and an actual of 62,151.  If I'm understanding you
correctly, you're asking me to allocate all of this volume to deal #51862.

If so, that's incorrect.  Several deals are associated the this days volume.

Please write back or phone back with further details.

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Karen Lindley @ ENRON                           08/21/2000 10:24 AM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Feedback Monitor Error - Meter 984132 - 1/99

Jackie,

Volume is allocating to deal number 51862 on 1/16/99 on meter 984132, however
the deal does not have this day on it.  Please have 1/16 added to the deal so
the error will clear.

Thanks and if you need additional info, let me know.

Karen


Hi Tana,

Our executed copy will be faxed to you this morning.  I'm currently
following up with Morningstar as well.

Regards,

Bill Breslin
Director
Insource Technology
281-774-4057

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 3:12 PM
To: bill.breslin@insource.com
Cc: Will.Zamer@enron.com; Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
Subject: NDA's - Morningstar Systems and Insource Technology

At the request of Will Zamer, I am attaching our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement for each of Morningstar Systems Inc. and Insource
Technology Corporation.   If the enclosed meets with your approval, please
execute each of the agreements and return them to me via fax no. (713)
646-3490.  I will then have them executed by Enron.  If you have any
comments or questions please call Mark Greenberg, Senior Counsel, at (713)
345-8897 or me at (713) 853-3399.  We look forward to hearing from you.

(See attached file: insource technology.doc)

(See attached file: morningstar.doc)


I agree with Melissa and am in favor of a separate process.

PT/RH employees need to be rated on a relevant scale.  A PT employee's job
scope "the place the initial bar is set" is not relevant to a FT employee.

Facilitation and Ground rules are great but as we know they change as the
circumstances of a meeting change.  Consistency here has not been our
strength.

I also agree that the PT/RH is an important talent pool.  If we don't give
these folks a chance at equal rating we stand to lose the ability to offer
this as a legitimate employee class.

In addition, we need to consider the message sent to FT employees.  Will they
preceive the process as fair.

Thanks
Cb

From: Melissa Becker/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/27/2001 12:04 PM
To: Gina Corteselli/ENRON@enronXgate, Gerry Gibson/Corp/Enron@Enron, David
Oxley/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert W
Jones/ENRON@enronXgate, Sarah A Davis/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marla Barnard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mary Joyce/ENRON@enronXgate, Andrea
Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Butcher/ENRON@enronXgate, Kriste
Sullivan/ENRON@enronXgate, Suzanne Brown/ENRON@enronXgate, Elyse
Kalmans/ENRON@enronXgate, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Cynthia
Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Kalen
Pieper/HOU/EES@EES, Judy Gray/HOU/EES@EES, Karen Moore/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: RE: Part Time/Reduced Hours Employees and PRC

In my opinion, a part time person who may add value in the time that they are
able to work will invariably get "creamed" in the prc, and that might impact
our ability to tap into this talent pool (assuming we want to).  I agree that
a part time person can't possibly add as much value (in most cases) as a full
time person, but it might be terribly demotivating to continually be rated as
"bottom of the pack".  I advocate either (1) a separate process or (2)
feedback without a ranking (like the non-exempts).

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Corteselli, Gina
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:03 AM
To: Gibson, Gerry; Oxley, David; Lynch, Drew; Jones, Robert W.; Davis, Sarah
A.; Olson, Cindy; Cash, Michelle; Barnard, Marla; Joyce, Mary; Yowman,
Andrea; Butcher, Sharon; Sullivan, Kriste; Brown, Suzanne; Kalmans, Elyse;
Tilney, Elizabeth; Barrow, Cynthia; Smith, Gary; Pieper, Kalen; Becker,
Melissa; Gray, Judy; Moore, Karen
Subject: Part Time/Reduced Hours Employees and PRC

All,

As you know I have been tasked with soliciting your views and suggestions on
PT/RH employees and PRC.  From my personal point of view I don't think we
should have a separate process for PT/RH employees.  I think that we should
cover the issue in facilitator training and have a statement in the ground
rules defining who is rated in PRC meetings, i.e. "all active exempt
employees hired after January 1, 2001  who have full time, part time or
reduced hours are rated in PRC."  Likewise, the new feature to provide
employee accomplishments in the PRC meeting may help to  balance the
committee's perspective on PT/RH employees.  Your thoughts?

Gina


sorry, not till i hear from legal but we probably won't pay the invoice.  as of right now, don't pay the invoice.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wynne, Rita
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:18 AM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: RE: Peoples Energy invoice

Chris,

So do I pay the invoice or not.  I'm a little confused from all the emails.  Please advise.  Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Cc: Brady, Kevin; Wynne, Rita; Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Peoples Energy invoice

Kay, ENA has a user ID on a system called Pegasys.  Peoples Gas invoices ENA about $400.00 a month for a License Fee, Customer Service Charge, and taxes and it looks like we have not paid this bill for the last 3 months.  In the pre-petition world, we used this ID to do nominations on the Peoples Gas system.  We are not currently using this ID and it looks like we no longer need an ID for this system.  BUT, Kevin Brady, an ENA scheduler, uses an Enovate and EMW LLC id to do nominations for those companies. Enovate is paying the invoices for those companies.  Can we cancel this ID, or should we just tell Peoples we are not going to pay the invoice and let them terminate the ID at their discretion?  Will not paying the ENA invoice impact EMW LLC or Enovate in any way?

 -----Original Message-----
From: Pikofsky, Lynn
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Germany, Chris; Wynne, Rita
Cc: Tomaski, Richard; Penman, Gregg; Brady, Kevin
Subject: FW: Peoples Energy invoice

Chris,
I work with Richard in the Chicago office.  I received the faxed copy of the Pegasys invoice from Houston.  Enovate pays two invoices every month, one for Enovate and one for EMW LLC.  The outstanding invoice includes past due charges from Enron North America. I spoke with Kevin Brady and he does not sign on as ENA, so can that account be cancelled?  With that, I am not sure why enovate would pay for this invoice.
Lynn

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Wed 3/13/2002 9:08 AM
To: Wynne, Rita
Cc: Tomaski, Richard; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Brady, Kevin
Subject: RE: Peoples Energy invoice
Give me your fax number and I'll fax it over.  Doug Sewell said he would not pay for it as ENA and I don't know enough about the deal to argue with him.  I've pasted in Richard's response is in black below.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tomaski, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:01 PM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: Re: FW: Peoples Energy invoice

I'm familar with the item. It sounds like enovate should pay it if it is enovate access.
Is this taken care of or do I need to call someone to pay it?  Let me know
Richard

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Wynne, Rita
Sent:   Wednesday, March 13, 2002 8:42 AM
To:     Germany, Chris
Cc:     Tomaski, Richard
Subject:        RE: Peoples Energy invoice
No I am not.  Donna Grief called me on Monday concerning this and I told her we would need Commercial's blessing and then approval by the cash committee.  I agreed to handle it because of the urgency of it needing to be paid.  According to Kim, normally it would appear on a buy/sale ticket and therefore, Margaret Dhont's group would handle this.  I'm not really sure what group should handle it.  Is there an invoice that you can get to me so that I can have it as backup support for the cash request?
 -----Original Message-----
From:   Germany, Chris
Sent:   Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:33 PM
To:     Wynne, Rita
Cc:     Tomaski, Richard
Subject:        FW: Peoples Energy invoice
Are you familiar with this item?
 -----Original Message-----
From:   Olinger, Kimberly S.
Sent:   Tuesday, March 12, 2002 3:18 PM
To:     Germany, Chris
Subject:        RE: Peoples Energy invoice
chris - forward the info to rita wynne and she will expedite the payment
 -----Original Message-----
From:   Germany, Chris
Sent:   Tuesday, March 12, 2002 2:20 PM
To:     Tomaski, Richard
Cc:     Brady, Kevin; Olinger, Kimberly S.; McMichael Jr., Ed
Subject:        Peoples Energy invoice
Beth Jenkins gave me your name as an Enron contact regarding Enovate.
I work for Ed McMichael on the gas side of the Enron Estate team.  Kevin Brady schedules gas for the Enron Estate Team.  Kevin received an invoice from Peoples Energy in the amount of $1,380.44, it looks like this invoice has not been paid in a few months.  I just faxed the invoice to you at 312-541-2728.  This invoice is for a license fee and a customer charge for Pegasys, the system Kevin uses to do nominations on Peoples Gas Light & Coke.  All the activity is for the Enovate deals.  Doug Sewell said that this should be paid by Enovate, not Enron.  Kevin was told by Peoples that if this invoice is not paid, they will terminate Kevin's access.  Do you know who we could forward this too so that it can get processed correctly?
Thanks
Chris L. Germany
Phone 713-853-4743
Fax  713-646-3059


Dear Steve,

Attached is our update on the Business Council Invitations.

Linda


Mike,

Here it is

Vince

	From:  Mike A Roberts                           04/19/2000 04:28 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PPT presentation

Vince,

could you please send me a copy of the final version used for Greg?

thanks

- - - Mike


no that is the settle , the market is not trading there but just so you know what the settle is for tonight

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boyt, Eric
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:08 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	RE: EEX Quote

That is your offer at tonights settle?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Dutch
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:07 PM
To:	Boyt, Eric
Subject:	RE: EEX Quote

settle came out at 2.878

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boyt, Eric
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:47 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	EEX Quote

Attached are the volumes.....

I had a mid, volume adjusted , number of $2.869, with an adjustment of .069

The quote is not a long as I was thinking.

Let me know,

Eric

 << File: Bobwest - NX3 Offer (D.Quigley) 1.10.02.xls >>


Diane

I connection with the copies of the Confirmation(s) you provided to me the other day -- the following Counterparty may also have confirmation(s):

				Norske Skog Canada Limited (f/n/a Fletcher Challenge Canada Limited -- for which you already provided the materials

				Norske Skog Canada Limited (f/n/a Pacifica Papers Inc.) -- for which trades were done 1/8/2001 & 2/2/2001.

Therefore, please provide a copy of all confirmations for those trades which are live, active and on the books that made in the name of Pacifica Papers Inc.

Thanks,

Susan

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3803A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
Email: Susan.Bailey@enron.com


According to the copy of the contract I have, under Exhibit A,

	1. The Rebate.  A portion of CDEC's demand charge associated with CDEC's generation fixed costs shall be avoidable by ECS if Customer operates the Compressor such that ECS is able to avoid placing a load on CDEC's system during certain CDEC coincidental peaks for any applicable month.  To calculate the monthly rebate, the actual demand charges as billed by CDEC will be subtracted from the Billing Demand Basis.  The Billing Demand Basis is the maximum demand charge on 10 MW of peak demand, assuming no peak avoidance during the applicable month.  Thus, the Customer's Rebate shall be a portion of the Billing Demand Basis that ECS is not billed by CDEC as actual demand charges.

The way I interpret this wording, we would be entitled to a demand charge rebate even if we only slow down the unit during the peak period.  I've only a copy of last August's bill, but we used 7.93 MW during Tri-States (CDEC's generation) peak.  At $8.86/kW (generation demand), this would entitle TW to a rebate of $18,340 for the month of August alone.  To me it is unclear if TW is actually receiving this rebate.  I've got Mark Walton looking into the issue.  Note that there is an additional "transmission demand" of $3.35 /kW that is coincident with CDEC's peak.  Currently, we have no method of predicting CDEC's peak.  Apparently for the month of August, CDEC's and Tri-State's peaks did not occur at the same time (although there is no specific information on the CDEC bill as to when their demand peak occurred) as the Tri-State peak and CDEC peak demand charges are based on different loads.  Interpretation of the contract language would lead one to believe the rebate would only apply to the demand associated generation, and thus be valued at $8.86/kW.  Even so, if we avoided CDEC's peak, it would be a saving to ECS and thus to Enron.  I understood from James Centilli that the economics were based on avoiding the peak demand 70% of the time (at $8.86/kW or $12.21/kW I don't know).

David, you are correct, we only have to avoid one peak in the month, the problem is predicting which peak is going to be the largest peak in the month.  You don't know for sure on the first day of the month if the load on that day will be higher than the load on the last of the month.  Below is a list Tri-States historical peaks (in MW):

1/3/2000	1114
2/1/2000	1048
3/20/2000	1080
4/3/2000	 977
5/23/2000	1126
6/22/2000	1381
7/7/2000	1888
8/14/2000	1924
9/5/2000	1541
10/23/2000	1296
11/17/2000	1439
12/18/2000	1534
1/30/2001	1516
2/9/2001	1482
3/1/2001	1388
4/22/2001	1251
5/25/2001	1407
6/29/2001	1932
7/31/2001	1939
8/6/2001	2008
9/4/2001	1699

For January 2000 the peak was on the 3rd, in 2001 it was on the 31.  The problem is you don't know for certain which day of the month will have the peak.  The contract did not specify they would only have one peak that they were going to interrupt us on, only that if we avoided their peak (whenever it occurred) we would save in demand charges.

Using the most conservative approach to avoid a demand peak, you would not run at all on the first day of a month (the first day is always a peak day in the month to date). You would only run during the second day when the system load is less than the peak we saw on the first day.  If the system load on the second day is higher than that of the first day, this now becomes the new peak of the month to date.  You would repeat this approach for each subsequent day in the month, shutting down or slowing down for each new peak in the month to date.

The approach I take is a little riskier in that it looks at last years load and 'budget' loads to estimate a 'minimum expected monthly peak'.  It than allows operation of the unit anytime the system load is less than the higher of (1) the actual monthly peak to date and (2) the 'minimum expected monthly peak'.  Thus my utility would let you run for the majority (and possibility all) of the first day and would have fewer peaks during the month than the conservative approach.

You are correct about ECS's obligation in establishing an automated system.  That system has turned into my system.  Sections 3.6 and Article 6 of the contract discuss this topic.  In my mind, ECS did not live up to their end of this agreement.  CDEC didn't do much either, only providing us access to Tri-States web site.  Tri-State changed their web site mid year requiring a change in the automated process (due to file format changes) delaying my implementation.  I offered to take over the automated system sometime around the end of the first quarter this year to force some progress on the issue.  There may me legal recourse available to recover some past demand charges due TW from ECS.

By my calculation/contract interpretation, the maximum rebate TW could receive is $8.86/kW * 10,000kW/Month * 12 Months/Year = $1,063,200/year.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Roensch, David
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:16 AM
To:	Choquette, Gary; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Jolly, Rich
Cc:	Asante, Ben; McChane, Bob; Sturn, John; Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: FW: Gallup Peak Power Avoidance Data Points

Gary you are correct in your assesment that we can avoid electrical power demand charges if we shut down during power utilities pear power period.  However, in discussions prior to finalizing this contract, I got the impression that a decision had been made that we MUST shut the unit down during peak demand periods or the econimics of the project did not come out.  (these discussions included: Mike Nelson, Rich Jolly, Mary Kay Miller, Dave Fotti, Ben Asante, D. Schoolcraft, James Centelli, Kevin Hyatt etc....)

Second:  The issue came up of "What about during tariff months?", can we still shut down during peak demand periods.  Again, if I remember correctly, the answer was, Yes, even during tariff months we don't have a choice we would have to shut down.

Third:  I was under the impression that from a risk standpoint we would not have to deal with more than ONE peak demand period in the month.

Fourth:  ECS was responsible for working with the CDEC to establish an automated system which would read CDEC's online load profile and convert the reading into a signal which would automatically control the loading on the Compressor and Motor (which would provide us with the opportunity to avoid the CDEC's peak load periods).  TW of course would have an override option.  However, I was also under the impression that ECS would hold TW harmless & reimburse, if this feature was not provided.

I may be interpreting this incorrectly but again the CSA specifies ECS's obligation in helping us avoid the demand energy charge.  The demand charge is $12.21 * 10,000 KW  * 12 Months = $1.465,200 of potential rebate back to TW each year.

 << File: rebate_sensitivity.xls >>

---------------------- Forwarded by David Roensch/ET&S/Enron on 10/04/2001 09:40 AM ---------------------------
From:	Gary Choquette/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/03/2001 09:46 AM CDT
To:	Darrell Schoolcraft/ENRON@enronXgate, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Todd Ingalls/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, DL-ETS Gas Controllers@/O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DL-ETSGASCONTROLLERS@EX@enronXgate, Dale Ratliff/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Ben Asante/ENRON@enronXgate, Kim Kouri/ENRON@enronXgate, Bob McChane/ENRON@enronXgate, John Sturn/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Errol Wirasinghe/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	RE: FW: Gallup Peak Power Avoidance Data Points

As I understand/interpret the Gallup contract, we can completely avoid electrical power demand charges (approximately $42,000 per month) if we do not run the unit during the power utilities peak power period.  If we can not shut down the unit, we can still reduce or demand costs by minimizing our power usage during the peak period.

Unlike Hubbard where the contract states avoiding the peak during a specified period of the day (5-7 PM), Gallup requires us to guess both the day of the month their peak will occur and the time of day.  Through access to Tri-States history data, I can guess what I think the minimum peak for the month will be.  I can look at the current day's usage and estimate if today's peak will be higher than the higher of (1) my estimated peak or (2) the actual peak so far this month.  If so, the "Probability today is a peak" will be near 100 indicating the operators they should expect a possible power peak sometime today.   The "Probability now is peak" approached 100 when an actual peak is underway.  The Tri-State Power Peak In Progress alarm triggers when a power peak is underway.

Note that it is impossible to predict with 100% accuracy if any day in the month is an actual power peak.  If the first day of the month has an estimated peak 1000 and last years peak for the same month, was 985.  It appears possible that this will be a power peak day.  Assume that the actual peak usage for the first day was 1010.  Now on the second day of the month, the estimated peak is 965, not likely to be a power peak day.  The third day has an estimated peak of 1005, a possible power peak day.  If the actual for the third day is 1012, it now becomes the new peak for the month.  If all other estimated peaks in the month are significantly below 1012, they are not likely to be power peaks, and unit turndown is not required.

The point is, to completely avoid demand charges, we would have had to shut down the unit for a period on the first day of the month, and also on the third day.  The utility integrates their peak over a 30 minute period, thus the minimum time the unit could be down.  I'm guessing that my utility could predict around seven peaks requiring turndown in a given month.

So far this month, I guessed a power peak on 10/1/01 starting at 20:18 and ending at 21:05.  The actual peak so far this month according to the utility was 10/1/01 starting at 20:30 lasting to 21:00.

I'm sorry for any confusion.  I had asked Dale to pass this information on to the Operators.  If there are any additional questions, do not hesitate to call me at 87-7546.


Please put this on my calendar and remind me.

thanks,  fletch
---------------------- Forwarded by Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT on 10/09/2000
07:12 AM ---------------------------

	From:  David W Delainey                           10/06/2000 12:32 PM

Sent by: Kay Chapman
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J
Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers
Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Bruce Sukaly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug
Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch
Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Christy Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Felicia
Doan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudette Harvey/HOU/ECT@ect,
Shelby Malkemes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chaun Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Strategy Meeting

Dave would like to have a strategy meeting next Tuesday  Ocotober 10, 2000
from 2:30-4:30 in room 30C1. No preparation is necessary and it's important
that each of you plan to attend. If you cannot attend, please contact Dave
directly.

Thanks!


What the heck is going on?  Do you feel lied to?

Dawn
----- Original Message -----
From: <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>
To: <dkenne@houston.rr.com>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:19 AM
Subject: RE: Pictures of Grace

> Is Gary's company hiring?
>
> DG
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Dawn and Gary Wilson" <dkenne@houston.rr.com>@ENRON
>    Sent:   Wednesday, November 07, 2001 8:25 AM
>    To:     Love, Phillip M.; Sweitzer, Tara; Bagwell, Jennifer J;
>              Waldhauser, Michelle; Giron, Darron C.; Quick, Joan; Rosado,
>              Jennifer
>    Subject:  Fw: Pictures of Grace
>
>
>
>    Here are some recent pictures of Grace.   Cannot believe she is already
>    7 weeks old!  Hope you guys are all  doing well and hope to see you
>    soon.
>
>
>    Dawn
>     - Boppy.jpg << File: Boppy.jpg >>
>     - DSC00120.JPG << File: DSC00120.JPG >>
>     - DSC00123.JPG << File: DSC00123.JPG >>
>     - DSC00124.JPG << File: DSC00124.JPG >>
>     - DSC00125.JPG << File: DSC00125.JPG >>
>     - DSC00128.JPG << File: DSC00128.JPG >>
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


It's been changed to CAISO energy.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           04/23/2001 01:18 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amy Smith/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: 588194

This deal is in as firm energy with an SP delivery point.

Thanks!


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/12/2000 11:05
AM ---------------------------

michael.barnas@ps.ge.com on 09/07/2000 07:46:07 PM
To: stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, Sheila.Tweed.@enron.com,
Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com, Scott.Dieball@enron.com,
Martin.W.Penkwitz@enron.com
cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com

Subject: GE Language

Folks,

Having conferred at last with my colleagues, I can now forward to you our
draft language for the Indemnity and LOL clauses.  As Steve mentioned in his
earlier message, he has suggested some issues to discuss which could bring
us closer to resolution on that issue.  Please let me know if you have any
question!

Best regards,

 Mike
g _____________
Michael C. Barnas
Counsel, Power Plants Commercial Operations
GE Power Systems
One River Road - Building 37, Room 307
Schenectady,  NY 12345  USA
Phone 8*235-7602       (518) 385 7602
Fax     8*235 5466        (518) 385 5466
Mobile 518 369 9538

 - MajorClausesGE01.doc


Cara,

Email Corry Bentley with the list of counterparties you would changed. If he is o.k. with those changes, then you may forward those changes to me and I will put in a GCP Request to have each one changed in the system.

Just let me know.

Regards,

Kimberly

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara
Sent:	Friday, July 13, 2001 12:59 PM
To:	Indelicato, Kimberly
Subject:	More about short codes

Hi Kim

Thanks for getting SCEM changed to MIRANT.  They started showing up right this morning.

How difficult is it to get them changed, and who all is affected by it?  I have a laundry list of codes that are cumbersome or confusing, and would like to see about changing a batch of them.  I will do all the leg work of finding out if certain ones are ok with everyone, but wanted your input and advice.

Thanks,

Cara


And the final numbers for May are...

 IFERC  1,240,000 (last volume was 72084 on Day 18)
 Enron  930,000 (last volume was 21667 on Day 26)
 Gas Daily 1,033,416 (last volume was 80000 on Day 31)

Please advise,

Ami


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron on 06/27/2002 05:33
PM ---------------------------

dfmatson@attbi.com on 06/27/2002 05:31:33 PM
To: jeffrey.duff@ps.ge.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Desert Sky curtailment lists

Jeff,
Thanks for taking care of this.  Still have any hair?
I got mine cut yesterday, so there isn't much to pull on...

This data will come in handy, and I'll get the March-May curtailment
list via pro-rating method to him tonight.

As for Mark's email, he has the same sort of address as yours, but I
keep getting notes from Postmaster@enron.com about not being able to
deliver the message...go figure.
Cheers, Dave

--
David F. Matson
Consulting Meteorologist
1650 Saint Lawrence Way
Pleasant Hill, CA  94523
925-933-7505 (voice & fax)
dfmatson@attbi.com


Your message

was delivered to the following recipient(s):

Edmiston, John on Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:21:28 -0400
    MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Dallas:DALMXSMB01

 - C.DTF


More dead trees...

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 10:09
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 12/06/2000 01:17:51 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Roseann Engeldorf (E-mail)" <roseann.engeldorf@enron.com>, "Pipitone,
Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris" <chriscobb@akllp.com>, "Taylor,
Rob" <robtaylor@akllp.com>

Subject: Enron South America Break-Out Agreement

Attached please find a clean copy of the Enron South America Turbine
Facility Agreement, which incorporates the specific performance
guarantees that had been included in Exhibit U.   The attached blackline
shows these changes as well as those made by Rob Taylor.  I have run the
blackline against version 2, which was the last version that I had sent
to you.

We are still missing the Agreement Reference in Section 6.7.1.  I will
send the revised exhibits (i.e., without Exhibit U) momentarily.
 <<Comparison of Version 2 to 4 (Enron South America Turbine
Agreement).DOC>>  <<ESA Break-out Agreement Draft of 12/5/00.DOC>>
 - Comparison of Version 2 to 4 (Enron South America Turbine Agreement).DOC
 - 00.DOC


Attached for your review please find the following documents:

1. Purchase Agreement;
2. Remarketing Agreement; and
3. Trust Agreement.

Please note that the attached documents have not been reviewed by UBS Warburg
and therefore remain subject to their comments. Please call Todd Eckland or me
with any questions or comments you may have.

Best regards,

Hazel Mukuna

(See attached file: Purchase Agreement.doc)        (See attached file:
Remarketing Agreement.doc)    (See attached file: Trust Agreement.doc)

______________________________________
This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is legally privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
message,or any attachment, is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this message in error, please notify the original sender (or the WSPR
Help Desk) immediately by telephone (212-858-1000) or by return
E-mail and delete the message, along with any attachments, from
your computer.  Thank you.

 - Purchase Agreement.doc
 - Remarketing Agreement.doc
 - Trust Agreement.doc


Probably in three months.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nichols, Natalie A
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:39 PM
To:	Causholli, Monika
Subject:	Pulp Forecast

When does a new RISI pulp forecast come out?  I have forgotten. Thanks.
Natalie


I like it.  Give it one final read through for final refinements.  Then send
to bay guardian, sf weekly, pacific sun (marin), (and the east bay has a
weekly mag, too, the name of which escapes me--might be out of berkeley).
Any of these would give good exposure, and likelihood of someone of your
caliber getting in is pretty high.


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 15:52:06 -0600
From: "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
To: <asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Ingebretson"
<cingebretson@bracepatt.com>,
<cshoneman@bracepatt.com>,<dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, <gfoote@bracepatt.com>,
"Gene Godley" <ggodley@bracepatt.com>, <jjava@bracepatt.com>,
<kcurry@bracepatt.com>, "Marc Hebert" <mhebert@bracepatt.com>,
<mhenry@bracepatt.com>, "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>,
<rcarroll@bracepatt.com>, <rrich@bracepatt.com>, <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
Cc: "Nancy Pickover" <npickover@bracepatt.com>
Subject: Nov. 1, 2000 DOE Press Release re Clinton/Gore Initiatives to Assist
California
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline

Administration Helps Electricity Consumers by Proposing Reliability Standards
and Working to Lower Costs

Clinton/Gore Administration Takes Action to Help Californians

Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson today announced a series of initiatives
that the Clinton/Gore Administration is taking to help California reduce the
strain on their electricity system and protect consumers. Most significantly,
Richardson said the Administration will likely send a proposed rule-making to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to establish mandatory
reliability standards for electricity * doing administratively what Congress
failed to accomplish this year.

"California's electricity market has become dysfunctional -- and it's time to
make it right," said Secretary Richardson. "More than once, California was
close to having blackouts rolling throughout the state. In San Diego,
residents and businesses saw their electric bills double almost overnight.
Consumers need an electricity system that is reliable and they should not be
facing this kind of price volatility."

Richardson made the announcement in Sacramento this morning with California
Gov. Gray Davis.

Richardson said the Energy Department will take several initiatives to help
the reliability of California's electricity system and protect consumers from
dramatic price volatility, including:

Establish mandatory reliability standards for electricity * The Energy
Department will seek public comment on a proposed rulemaking that would
require utilities to follow mandatory rules to protect the reliability of the
electric grid in California and elsewhere. The Administration and others have
been pressing Congress to enact these much-needed rules to protect consumers.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to break the impasse in Congress and
authorize establishing the standards necessary to make electricity supplies
more reliable and energy markets more efficient;

Improve California's ability to import power * The Western Area Power
Administration, an Energy Department agency that co-owns a major substation
in Northern California, will provide $2 million to add a second transformer
there. This will help California bring in much-needed power from the Pacific
Northwest;

Provide millions to improve energy efficiency * The department is releasing a
half million dollars in grants to the California Energy Commission to support
programs that will make California buildings, which account for approximately
8 percent of all the energy used in buildings in the U.S., more energy
efficient. In addition to the $3.7 million the Energy Department has provided
the state this year to help weatherize 3,081 lower-income California
households, the department will provide $4.2 million next year to weatherize
homes and help lower the electricity bills of those that can least afford
high prices;

Work to add renewable sources * The department is working with the state and
local governments to help develop the tremendous renewable resources in
California, such as wind, solar, geothermal and biomass. To this end,
Richardson said the department's budget for next year contains $3 million for
wind projects and $5.6 million for geothermal projects in California;

Reduce electricity consumption at key times * Participate, along with
representatives from other federal agencies with facilities in California, in
meetings in Sacramento today to develop a process for reducing electricity
consumption during heat waves; and

Get federal power to California * Continue the work of the department's
Bonneville Power Administration and Western Area Power Administration with
California to get federal power to the state when it is needed the most.
Richardson announced that Bonneville's contract to provide low-cost power to
Bay Area Rapid Transit will continue;

Further cooperation with California * The Energy Department will also form a
partnership with the state of California to ensure that the department's
programs and resources are put to use to help the state with its electric
problems.

Separately today FERC released a report that examines the causes of
California's electricity problems. FERC also issued a proposed order that
will help reduce wholesale electricity prices in California. Richardson urged
the Commission to move quickly to help protect California's citizens and
businesses.

Media Contact: April Kaufman, 202/586-5806

Release No. R-00-283


Here's the document we discussed.? It is one of our  approved fact sheets.
?
If you have any trouble with the file, let me  know.
?
Ken
 - Constructive plan.doc


To:								Department:  	ENA Legal

From:		Mark Taylor					Date:	May 11, 2001
		Vice President and General Counsel

Subject:	Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions for ENA's NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business on June 15, 2001 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO THIS REQUEST.


This is a problem your people should be aware of because I think our usual
practice when we want to verify ownership structure is to call the corporate
secretary's office.  If they are behind, I don't know who we should go to in
the future.  Maybe we need to run everything by corp. tax from now on.  Ugh.
DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 06/01/2000
07:52 AM ---------------------------

Alicia Goodrow
05/31/2000 04:31 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Corporate Secretary's Data Sheets

The erroneous statements found in the Form 2 related to Transwestern today
are traceable in part to the fact that the Corporate Secretary's Data Sheets
are months behind in their accuracy.  This is not the first instance where
serious and costly errors have been made by persons who were relying on the
data sheets for accurate ownership information on Enron Corp. subsidiaries.

If you have any creative ideas on finding a remedy for the extremely long lag
time between the submission of final documentation to the Corporate Secretary
and the updating of the sheets, please let me know.  In the meantime, be
aware that the information is not necessarily reliable.

Thanks

Alicia


George,

Wednesday,  1:00 works for me.

Vince

George Hopley
10/13/2000 11:28 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meeting

It was good to speak with you the other day.
Let's tentatively meet next Wednesday at 1:00 pm.

Let me know if this works for you or if there is another
time that is convenient.

Thanks


Daily Blessing
http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless143.htm

Jan
http://www.daily-blessings.com/humor52.htm

check out thanksgiving pages...send them on to friends and family to let them
know you are thankful for them!

http://www.debsfunpages.com/thanksgiving.htm

win a digital camera, $4500.00 or MORE
http://www.daily-blessings.com/4500.htm

FORGET PC PHONE. GET REAL LONG DISTANCE AT NO COST bigredwire is the first
and only company to offer REAL long distance at no cost
Switch your long distance to bigredwire and get REAL long distance at zero
cost to you. Up to 100 complimentary minutes everyday when you zap your
online bill. If you don't zap, pay only 5 cents a minute without fees. Switch
now!
find out how at http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjbigredwire.htm

Mr Inkman-for all your ink needs
http://www.daily-blessings.com/inkman.htm

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (judy.hernandez@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address judy.hernandez@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: judy.hernandez@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


I will be on vacation from October 6- 13.  Also, the ENA lawyers will be
offsite October 5 and 6.
Should you need assistance during my absence, please contact my assistant
Kaye Ellis at Ext. 35968 who will direct you to a lawyer.
Thanks.  Sara


Grif,

Please provide a temporary id

Phillip
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/26/2001
05:04 PM ---------------------------

Dexter Steis <dexter@intelligencepress.com> on 03/26/2001 02:22:41 PM
To: Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: NGI access to eol

Hi Phillip,

It's that time of month again, if you could be so kind.

Thanks,

Dexter

*****************************
Dexter Steis
Executive Publisher
Intelligence Press, Inc.
22648 Glenn Drive Suite 305
Sterling, VA 20164
tel: (703) 318-8848
fax: (703) 318-0597
http://intelligencepress.com
http://www.gasmart.com
******************************

At 09:57 AM 1/26/01 -0600, you wrote:

>Dexter,
>
>You should receive a guest id shortly.
>
>Phillip


Kevin will book a conference room close to his office.


This pretty much summarizes the events over the weekend resulting from PG&E's
filing on Monday--more stellar leadership from the administration.
Biggest news is that the Governor is now frantically trying to cobble
together a Tx buy-out deal with Edison & Sempra; but note that Burton in this
story questions whether it makes sense to buy Tx if PG&E isn't part of the
deal.
The first hearing on the bankruptcy is today.

Governor, Utility In War Of Words
Davis furious as PG&E defends bankruptcy filing
David Lazarus, Chronicle Staff Writer
Monday, April 9, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/04/09/M
N223519.DTL
California's energy mess took an ugly turn yesterday as Gov. Gray Davis and
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. traded barbs over who is to blame for the
bankruptcy of the state's largest utility.
In a series of tit-for-tat statements, each side laid claim to the moral high
ground while insisting that the other had been dealing in bad faith.
The governor spent part of his time yesterday giving television interviews in
response to The Chronicle's report Saturday that PG&E awarded $50 million in
bonuses and raises to 6,000 employees just hours before Friday's bankruptcy
filing.
"PG&E's management is suffering from two afflictions: denial and greed,"
Davis said in a brief statement Saturday night.
In a testy reply, PG&E countered that "instead of focusing all his attention
on solving the state's yearlong and ever-worsening energy crisis, the
governor has launched a campaign-style attack on our company."
PG&E said Davis was criticizing "thousands of men and women who have worked
tirelessly and professionally through this crisis" and concluded that
"California would be far better served if the governor turned his attention
to the crisis at hand."
Steve Maviglio, a spokesman for the governor, fired back yesterday: "PG&E
waged a public relations war on Friday. If they're looking for somebody to
blame, they should look in the mirror."
Maviglio also said the governor was concentrating on reaching a final accord
with Southern California Edison Co. for the state to purchase the cash-
strapped company's power lines for nearly $2.8 billion.
A last round of talks was scheduled to be held last night.
"There are a few remaining details to be worked out, but it seems pretty
close," Maviglio said, adding that an announcement of the deal could come as
early as today.
"The governor is spending his time negotiating with a responsible utility,"
he said.
Along with the Edison deal, Davis spent the weekend huddling with energy
advisers and lawyers trying to come up with an appropriate response to PG&E's
bankruptcy bombshell.
Efforts to stabilize California's dysfunctional electricity market suddenly
have become much more complex.
NOT MUCH CHANGED
Nevertheless, while PG&E's bankruptcy is by far the most sensational aspect
of California's long-drawn-out energy mess, at the end of the day, it doesn't
really change a thing.
Consider:
-- PG&E's financial woes stem from a rate freeze that prevented the utility
from passing along to customers runaway wholesale power costs. That rate
freeze and sky-high electricity prices remain in place.
-- California's energy shortage is primarily the result of the state not
having built any major power plants for the past 12 years. PG&E's bankruptcy
does nothing to affect that precarious situation.
-- PG&E's foray into bankruptcy court does not alter the fact that
electricity demand is outpacing available supply. California consumers still
face a threat of daily blackouts when power usage spikes this summer.
"The crux of the problem is still the same," said Loretta Lynch, president of
the state Public Utilities Commission. "We face the same challenges we did
before PG&E filed for bankruptcy."
She added, however, that PG&E's bankruptcy "increases the uncertainty."
The utility doesn't see it that way.
PG&E spokesman Ron Low said California's energy woes are no more uncertain
now than they were when the company ostensibly was negotiating with Davis to
find an equitable solution to the state's troubles.
"California remains in an energy crisis," he said. "As we head toward summer,
resources are going to be very tight."
WHAT COULD HAPPEN
In the short run, consumers will notice no change whatsoever. Bankruptcy
protection will allow PG&E to continue operating as usual while the company's
creditors line up to receive at least partial payment of outstanding bills.
Longer term, there is a very real possibility that electricity rates will
soar if the bankruptcy judge agrees with PG&E that conditions for lifting the
rate freeze were met a year ago and that $9 billion in subsequent expenses
must be borne by consumers.
How much people's bills would rise depends on how the rate increase is
structured. It would probably come in the form of a surcharge on existing
fees,
but the monthly hit to consumers could be limited by spreading the total cost
over a number of years.
The big question mark now is how PG&E's bankruptcy will affect various
political and legislative measures intended to keep California's lights on.
The state's attempt to purchase PG&E's power lines is obviously finished,
although a new deal could be negotiated in bankruptcy court.
Meanwhile, the governor is pressing ahead with plans to purchase the
transmission systems of Edison and Sempra Energy's San Diego utility --
although what the state would do with only a partial power grid has yet to be
determined.
"Does it make any sense to have the transmission lines of Edison and Sempra
and not PG&E?" asked state Senate President Pro Tem John Burton, D-San
Francisco. "I don't know the answer to that."
A final accord with Edison this week would validate PG&E's apparent concerns
that it would have had a harder time limiting backlash to its bankruptcy
filing if the utility had acted after a breakthrough with Edison was
unveiled.
The Chronicle quoted PG&E insiders yesterday as saying that the decision to
file for bankruptcy had been made early last week, even though senior company
officials said the move followed the governor's Thursday night speech on
solving California's energy issues.
One reason PG&E opted to file on Friday morning was because a final deal with
Edison was expected at any time, observers said.
Paul Patterson, an analyst at Credit Suisse First Boston, noted that if PG&E
had filed for bankruptcy after Edison came to terms with the state, "they
would be seen as a spoiler."
ENSUING CONFUSION
In any case, PG&E's surprise filing has left all concerned scrambling for
footing in the changed political landscape.
Consumer advocates watched with dismay yesterday as the state's political and
corporate powers slugged it out for supremacy.
Nettie Hoge, executive director of The Utility Reform Network in San
Francisco, said all this finger-pointing will do nothing to ensure that
Californians have ample supplies of electricity this summer.
"These guys should grow up and come up with a situation that works for the
public," she said.
E-mail David Lazarus at dlazarus@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 1


Are you refering to the recital requested by FSL?

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (44-20-7903-1000), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.


I thought this was a nice thank you from David.  Even though he did not win
the scholarship, he enjoyed the experience and he is offering to help us in
the future!

Karen
----- Forwarded by Karen Marshall/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001 07:41 AM -----

	"David Silldorff" <David.Silldorff@mba02.bus.utexas.edu>
	03/28/2001 11:14 PM

		 To: <Karen.Marshall@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Enron MBA Excellence Scholarship

Dear Karen,

Thank you again for including me in your group of finalists for the Enron
Scholarship.? Enron's commitment to community service and education is most
admirable, I and felt honored to be selected (particularly considering the
other people chosen).? I even enjoyed the interview experience, mostly
because of the neat interviewers.

I also appreciate the prompt replies to all correspondence, as well as the
follow-up call this evening (even if the news was not quite what I wanted to
hear).? It's great to see people "doing it right".? If you need any
assistance with future events at UT, please don't hesitate to call.

Sincerely,

David Silldorff
(512)458-8878

?


The entity should be LRCI, Inc.  You can change the entity in the letter and send it out.  Let me know if you have any questions.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Israni, Rakhi
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 9:32 AM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	RE: Mowing Letter

Gerald,

Any luck on the LRCI-LRPC issue?

Rakhi
(x3-7871)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 12:02 PM
To:	Israni, Rakhi
Subject:	Mowing Letter

Attached is a draft of the mowing letter for Assumption Parish.  Please review.  The address needs to be added in Exhibit A.  Let me know if you have any questions.

 << File: Mowing Letter.doc >>


Dan - Barbara Lucero has not been an active contract employee for quite some time.  In fact, I had never heard of her.  This was discussed with Human Resources  last week and she was deleted from the SAP system as of November 30th.

Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McCarty, Danny
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:10 AM
To:	Neubauer, Dave; McGowan, Mike W.; Kilmer III, Robert; Miller, Mary Kay
Subject:	FW: Contractors

All,
    As you are aware, we've let 4,000 full time tenured employees go.  Our retention of any contractors will be scrutinized to the highest degree.  Please prepare an explanation for each of the contractors (from the list below) in your area that you wish to retain.  Upon completion, please forward it to me.

Dan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schaffer, Brian
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 4:18 PM
To:	McCarty, Danny
Subject:	Contractors

Danny:

	Below is a list of six contractors within your organization.  We need to determine whether any are performing critical, indispensable tasks.  If so, fine.  If not, I need to assist you in processing them out.  Please let me know your decision as soon as possible.  Please bear in mind that the presumption is that they are not critical -- there needs to be ample justification to retain.  This exercise is being done for all contractors throughout ETS.

Ronald Abraham	Omaha			working for Dave Neubauer
Van Dickerson		Houston		working for Eric Gadd (already been decided to let go)
Barbara Lucero		Bloomington, MN	working for Mike McGowan
India Torres		Houston		working for Robert Burleson (Neubauer's org)
Jeanette Doll		Houston		working for Walter Lokey (Kilmer's org)
Francis Clements	Omaha			working for Tim Kissner (Mary Kay Miller's org)


Pig,

There is a key to the left of the number one that contains the "little
squiggly thing".  How you get your "little squiggly thing" on top of the
N is a different matter.  Let me know if you figure it out.......

>>> "Brian Constantine" <brianc@saltgrass.com> 05/20/02 07:34AM >>>
I think that was LN's feeble attempt at "Spanish"...aka SENOR....Hey
how do you type the little squiggly thing on top of the "n" ???

-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:50 PM
To: EriK Wollam; Chet Fenner; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; John Chambers;
Brian Constantine
Subject: Re: are you all dead?

When did Joe graduate from Mr. to "senior"?

	----- Original Message -----
	From: Erik Wollam
	Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 4:15 PM
	To: knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com;
Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; john.chambers@bisys.com;
brianc@saltgrass.com
	Subject: are you all dead?

	What's the deal. No traffic all week. Makes coming to work
really lame.

	Here's something to talk about. Karnes City!!! Like it is time
to cut checks
	again and mail them to the opielas before they call me and hit
me up for a
	raise on our rent.

	John:Last year looks like the break down was as follows: you
wrote a ckedk
	to Rancho Grande Trust for 2,600 and collected from Mark and
Matt.
	I wrote one for 900 and collected from pig, shet, smack, hudge
and senior
	saftey.

	SO Brian, Chet, Chad, Hudge and Joe need to cut me a check for
150 a piece
	and mail it to my office 815 walker #1447 H/T 77002.

	If you are not interested in getting back on, let me know so I
can fill your
	spot.

	John, mail your check and I will send off with mine and contract
for emerick

	KCLN

	_________________________________________________________________
	Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger:
http://messenger.msn.com