Refinancing Your Mortgage May Be Easier Then You Think!  Now that rates are down,  this may be a good time to start saving money!  Click here for all details  Free Service for USA Homeowners!    Whether your credit rating is A++ or you are "credit challenged", we have many loan  programs through hundreds of aggressive lenders wanting to help you.   Second Mortgages  We can help you get up to 125% of your homes value (ratios vary by state).   Refinancing Reduce your monthly payments and get some cash back.  Debt Consolidation Combine all your bills into one low payment, and save money every month.     We will get you the best deal possible!  Lower rates and easier terms!  CLICK HERE For All Details And A Free Loan Quotation Today!     We strongly oppose the use of SPAM email and do not want anyone who does not wish to receive our mailings to receive them. As a result, we have retained the services of an independent 3rd party to administer our list management and remove list (http://www.removeyou.com/). This is not SPAM.  If you do not wish to receive further mailings, please click below and enter your email at the bottom  of the page. You may then rest-assured that you will never receive another email from us  again. http://www.removeyou.com/  The 21st Century Solution. I.D. # 027316


>From: credit_card@creditissued.com
>To: lsutaylor@hotmail.com
>CC:
>lsutch@hotmail.com,lsutcliffe@hotmail.com,lsutd@hotmail.com,lsutee@hotmail.com
>Subject: You're Approved! Up To $2,500 Visa/Mastercard!
>Date: Nov 13, 2001
>
>Unsecured Visa or Mastercard with a credit line up to $2500, 100%
>Guaranteed acceptance!
>
>Bad Credit, No Credit, Bankruptcy....NO PROBLEM!
>Use it for cash advances!
>Use it for the comming holidays!
>Click below to get yours now!
>
>http://www.your-new-creditcard.com0key=50index=4@1063336996/-c59983/    ~~
>
>
>2+)*=%2/,6/*1=52p;/1"2+)*;25889"2+)*:"2+)*99"???_________________________________________________________________?Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001
08:20 AM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
02/16/2001 04:43 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny
Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT, EOL Call Center
cc: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara
Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Bridge Monitor

This evening, the new improved bridge monitor will be migrated to the EOL
production environment.  Several new enhancements were created to make this
application more efficient.  Such as:

1.  The bridge will handle 20 messages/second, instead of processing 1
message/second.
2.  The screens will no longer jump around! (Yeah)  You can select and view a
transaction without having the screen update with new deals.
3.  Historical deal query - ability to select and process historical dates
very quickly.
4.  Sorting capability - you can query any of the eight column headers by
selecting the column and typing a risk book, trans. id, deal capture system,
etc. and it  will filter to that section.

Please forward this e-mail to your groups.  If you have any questions or
concerns with the new bridge monitor please contact me at 3-9353 or Tara at
3-4523.  We hope this helps, I know it has made our lives easier while
testing.  Also, feedback is much appreciated!

Thanks,
Dawn


Dear Team Members:

Here is the itinerary for next week:

Those requiring overnight stays, we will be staying at the Montford Inn:
322 W. Tonhawa
Norman, OK 73069
405/321-2200

I have made the following reservations:
Sunday night:  Jody, Justin, Lexi, Patrick
Monday night: Sally, James, Lexi

Monday, October 30
Interviewers:  Sally Beck, James Scribner, Tana Cashion, Patrick Maloy, Jody
Crook, Justin O'Malley
Sally & James:  Your interviews will begin at 9am.  We will meet you on
campus.
Patrick, Tana, Jody, and Justin:  We will meet in the breakfast area of the
Montford Inn at 7:45 to proceed to campus.

** As the candidates are interviewed, I will be asking for your comments
immediately after you have completed the evaluation form.  This will be
necessary for notifying the students ASAP if they are needed for a round 2
interview.  When possible, we will conduct round 2 interviews later in the
day on Monday.

Tuesday, October 31
Interviewers:  Sally Beck, James Scribner, Tana Cashion, Greg Nickel
Greg:  Your interview schedule will begin at 9am.  Please meet us at the
Career Services (in the Union building) once you arrive
Sally, James, and Tana:  We will meet in the breakfast area of the Montford
Inn at 7:45 to proceed to campus.

No interviews will be scheduled after noon on Tuesday.  For those candidates
unable to schedule a round 2, we will conduct those interviews via telephone
if necessary.


Re the attached email , he is highly recommended by Reliant's lawyer in
Saramento. Jacobs served in Drivon's role in the Senate proceedings involving
Ins Comm'r Quackenbush last year and is well known and respected in the
Legislature. He has been informally advising Reliant's lawyer on contempt
issues. He does not think he has a conflict and will confirm that. Initially
his role would be solely as a consultant.

The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying
documents is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney
work product rule and is confidential business information intended only for
the use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or representative of the recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify
the Systems Administrator at admin@pkns.com and immediately delete this
message from your system.


Please find attached, the detail on the name change from ECR Energy, LLC to
Northland Energy Trading, LLC

Short name changes on affected records will be coordinated with ERMS IT,
tomorrow, Fri, 02/23.

Records on the Feb 2001 report will be inactivated next Thu, 03/01.


Overview
Since many of you can not attend every meeting at FERC  regarding Generator Interconnection, we would like to provide you with a  few highlights of the past two weeks.

Interestingly, generators are finding that the Transmission  Owning (TOs) entities and ISOs have been less-combative than one may have  thought. This is largely due to Daniel Larcamp's, Director of OMTR at FERC,  statement to the TOs that they can not hide behind the excuse that prior  practice and their Open Access Transmission Tariffs (OATT) prevent  them from granting many of the reasonable requests of the generators.  Larcamp said in no uncertain terms that the current OATTs are not hard- and-fast  anymore, instead, they are most likely going to be subject  to revisions per recent FERC orders.

The generator group is working very well together. We, the  Alliance of Energy Suppliers, are present and very involved in all of  the generator strategy sessions and industry meetings, in addition to  having Chuck Linderman of our Alliance on the "process group". This  process group develops the issue lists for discussions and decides on  logistics and procedures for the upcoming meetings.  The Alliance has  also sponsored lunch for the generator group and continues to offer  our offices and conference rooms to any generators that may need office space  amenities during their extended visits here in Washington.

Procedural Schedule for Interconnection  Meetings
9:00AM       Llarger industry  session convenes to receive direction from FERC staff on the day's topics  and process
9:15-9:30-    Break into sector caucuses,  i.e. Generators, Transmission Owners (TO), RTOs/ISOs, Transmission  Dependent
                        Utilities (TDU), and Others.
10:30-12PM- All caucus groups come together to express desired  outcomes on certain issues and topics
12:00-1:30-    Caucus Group Working  Lunches
1:30-3:30-     Larger groups convene to  discuss individual caucus groups' concerns and issues and attempt  consensus
3:45-4:45-     Individual caucus groups  meet again to discuss positions and find compromise or consensus  on issues
5:-5:30PM-    Plenary session to chart out next  steps and topics for next meeting.

Positive Meeting  Developments

Scope of Service
Generators were very successful in negotiating to receive an  option for generators to have three product levels of Interconnection Service.  Optionality was a paramount issue for generators. TOs conceded to offer the  following services:

(1) Energy Resource- based on the PJM study process  model
(2) Network Resource- transmisison rights will be firm and  comparable to TOs network resources
(3) "Simple interconnection" which allows for several options  to be chosen, but basic interconnection of the directly  assigned facility is the minimum.

Queuing
TOs recognized that the queue positioning issues were  generator v. generator issues, so suggested that we offer suggestions to them as  to how to structure and administer the queue. Generators agreed and developed  the rights and timing it wished.

Functions of the Queues
(1) identify order of studies
(2) identifies timing of projects for developers
(3) identifies and allocates costs responsibility

Limited Consensus
TOs suggested, as generators had articulated that Best  practices #4 of te ANOPR be adopted as the minimum and build fro those  principles. So in essence
(1) queue position for all interconnection requests be based  on the date the TP receives the request; (
(2) the Generator must meet reasonable milestones to retain  position in the queue;
(3) if a generator misses stipulated milestones, it will be  able to have a time period which to "cure" the deficiency. But if after  the reasonably agreeable time frame is exhausted, if  not cured, the generator may be at risk for losing its place in the queue;
(4) queue position may be at risk, if a generator makes  substantial "material change". ( material changes must be further
     defined by the  generators)

Scope of Studies and Interceonnection Agreement and  Procedures
Outstanding Questions and Issues to be addressed in Later  Session
(1) when is a generator included in the "base case" study or  modeling
(2) when is a generator on the hook for costs
(3) time line for when a generator receives a feasibility  study and that all developers should receives a feasibility study, unlike the  current practice where that is not the norm
(4) if a generator cancels a project that had been allocated  costs for upgrades associated with its facilities, who pays for the necessary  upgrades if the generator drops out and does not complete the project?

Milestones
Generators requested that milestones be tied into the  progression of a construction project. These milestones will include time lines  and schedules. The milestones will begin when a generator applies for  interconnection.

Note: TOs asked if generators could develop  the milestones since they viewed them as a generator-to-generator issue. As a  result, a group of generators joined a group of transmission owners to help  develop the milestone language.

Drafting Team
A drafting team was formed that contains representatives from  each participatory group at the Interconnection meetings. This group  will draft consensus language for the final Interconnection document  submittal. This group takes day-by-day issues and attempts to fashion language  that represents broad consensus on these issues. The language proposals  are then vetted back through the individual caucus groups and voted on for  later approval by the entire industry group. (FERC distributed a voting guide  that helps categorize what is consensus and what is not)

Next Meetings
Thanksgiving week- Nov 19-23. NO  MEETINGS There will be no FERC Interconnection meetings for this week.  However, the generators will  have a caucus  conference call on Monday Nov., 19 at 11AM to prepare for the following week's  meetings. If you would like that call in number please e-mail Chuck Linderman at  Clinderman@eei.org
 - Tonja Wicks.vcf


I spoke to Tim today regarding the prepayment transactions with terminated counterparties.  He constructed this e-mail in response.  Hope this clarifies.

Have a Merry Christmas,
Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Belden, Tim
Sent:	Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:58 PM
To:	Alonso, Tom; Fischer, Mark; Mallory, Chris; Bishop, Serena; Platter, Phillip; Semperger, Cara; Scholtes, Diana; Crandall, Sean; Calger, Christopher F.; Thomas, Jake; Thome, Stephen; Rosman, Stewart; Choi, Paul; Lackey, Chris; Buerkle, Jim; Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Yoder, Christian; Sager, Elizabeth; Postlethwaite, John; White, Stacey W.; Reeves, Leslie
Cc:	Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Subject:	New West Power Deal Info

Confidential:  For Internal Distribution Only

The purpose of this e-mail is to bring everyone in the loop on activities on the west desk that we are undertaking to preserve as much value in our book as possible.  I realize that our efforts to date have not been communicated to all internal people who need to know what we are doing.  My apologies for this.  Hopefully this e-mail will accomplish that goal.

A number of counterparties in the west have not yet terminated our deals and have benefited from our inability to procure power in the market to serve these deals.  As a result, we haven't been delivering on several contracts that are deep in the money.  Our counterparties have no motivation to terminate our contracts because such a termination would force them to write us a substantial check.  Instead, these counterparties have been happy to not receive high priced power from us and are filling their positions in the market at much lower prices.

We have taken the limited supplies that we are still receiving and delivering these limited supplies to the highest price sales contracts that we have.  We now have the ability to prepay for additional supplies in order to fulfill additional pre-petition obligations that have not yet been terminated that are in the money.  We have received approval from the Cash committee for purchases through December 27th (I think) and we will secure additional cash to continue on.

Here are the procedures as I understand them.  If you have any questions or modifications please me an e-mail or give me a call.

Cash Desk
Each cash desk needs to identify all transactions in its region that have not been terminated.
On a counterparty by delivery point basis we need to assess whether the weighted average of all near term (next day to next week) deliveries with that counterparty are in the money.
If the average of all transactions with that counterparty at a given location are in the money, we should submit a request for and endeavor to serve the entire portfolio of deals with that counterparty at that delivery point.  We are of the opinion now that we will not be able to cherry pick deals with one counterparty at the same location.
The cash desks should prepare a two week view of the positions that we will need to fill and an estimate (based on spot market prices) of the cash that we will need to serve these transactions to Steve Thome.
The cash desk should provide a daily list of prepay deals that have been done to John Postlethwaite via e-mail.
The cahs desk should provide a list of all historic prepays done so far to bring John current.

Marketing Desk
Steve Thome will coordinate the cash approval process for the west desk.
The marketing desk is responsible for lining up counterparties who will be willing to supply us on a prepay basis.
The marketing desk should direct any legal questions from sellers to Steve Hall/Christian Yoder.
Make sure that sellers fax a copy of the confirmation letter to Steve Hall/Christian Yoder at (503) 464-8058.
The marketing desk needs to work with the cash desk to buy power on a spot basis.  We don't necessarily care who buys it, but rather, we want to ensure that we receive the best price and that all purchases are communicated.
Whoever secures a supply needs to communicate the need for cash to Steve Thome.

Deal Entry
The new deals need to be entered in a manner that will be possible to settle.  After discussing the matter with Stacey White, she recommended entering the new deals in Enpower as zero price, non MTM, with an annuity equal to the prepay amount.
We should enter notes into Enpower indicating that these are prepay transactions.
This will allow settlements to match an annuity in Enpower with prepay out the door.  It will also prevent them from paying the counterparty twice.

I'm sure that I've missed something.  Let me know.

Regards,
Tim


Kim,

I will be out of the office next week.  Please get with Jennifer Sabine and
go over these issues with her.

Daren
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 12/10/99 04:34
PM ---------------------------

	Anita Luong
	12/09/99 11:21 AM

To: Kimberly Vaughn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HL&P for 11/99

Here are the issues for HL&P for 11/99:

The shortage at San Jac meter 1554 (the 95%) cannot be made up at 7268
because not enough flow at the meters.  What can we do?  Buyback?
Adonis has nom of 10000mmbtu on day 4, should this be kept whole?   If so,
how?  Day 4 flowed of 153mmbtu at the aggregate meter.

Please advice.

Thanks


You have received this message because someone has attempted to send you an e-mail from outside of Enron with an attachment type that Enron does not allow into our messaging environment. Your e-mail has been quarantined and is being held at the MailSweeper server.

Sender:  chealey@luce.com
Date:  Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:01:33 -0800
Subject:  New Filed Rate case
Attachment Type: Scenarios/Incoming/Inbound URL Catcher: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'brown v. mci worldcom network services, inc..url'.

If the intended email is of valid business-related content and you believe it requires Enron resources to retrieve it, you may call your Help Desk and ask to have it released from quarantine and delivered to your e-mail Inbox. Your message will be scanned and checked for viruses prior to requested release.  If it contains a virus or there is reason to suspect it is malicious code, it will not be delivered.

North American Resolution Center: 713 853 1411
European Resolution Center: 0044 207 78 36777
EES Help Desk: 888 853 9797
ETS Solution Center: 713 345 4745 (Houston) or 402 398 7454 (Omaha)

Please DO NOT reply to this address as it is not a monitored system mailbox.


we need to pass on penalties to counterparties who cut us on gas day of may
11.  many counterparties are swinging on eol deals, so  going foward we are
going to rank those counterparties to take the cuts.  as far as this deal
goes, the problems incurred were due to logistical issues.  we did rerank
wild goose for cycle 4, but pg&e did not allow for renoms on this cycle.
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 05/14/2001
01:31 PM ---------------------------

"Aberle, Derek" <DerekAberle@aec.ca> on 05/14/2001 11:42:24 AM
To: "'mlenhart@enron.com'" <mlenhart@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Liquidated Damages Pertaining to May 11 Gas Day

 Matt

 I am passing on these penalties for non-performance Friday for the
firm volumes that did not flow.  The firm sales amount of which you did not
perform was  5000 mmbtu at $6.90.  Gas daily reported that the weekend
traded as low as $3.70.  Therefore, we are assessing liquidated damages in
the amount of US$16,000, the amount of which Lisa Feisst will invoice.  I
would like to ensure that this problem does not happen again. Wildgoose is
not the swing market, and all transactions completed on your screen are firm
as are all transactions, unless otherwise specified, with Wildgoose and
Alberta Energy Company.  We, at Alberta Energy Company consider this a
serious matter, not the dollar figure associated but the implications in the
California market place and are treating it as such.  Our companies have had
a longstanding relationship and we would like rectify this problem so we can
regain trading together in the future.  A letter outlining the above will be
sent to yourself  and John Lavorado for your records.

 Thanks


Rick:

Just want to provide a summary of our discussion on Wednesday, 4/19/2000
regarding the analyst program and the conclusions reached.

Discussion item #1:  Similarities and differences between the commercial and
commercial services analyst position.  Concluded that the only difference
between the two analyst profiles is the difference in merit and bonus
compensation.  Both have the opportunity to rotate across commercial and
commercial services areas, return to business school after two years, stay
and be promoted either to a commercial services professional position or take
a commercial route and ultimately be promoted to associate.

Agreed:  There is one analyst program and we will immediately eliminate the
compensation differences.  All analysts will receive the same 5K yearly merit
increase and be eligible for the commercial bonus range.

Discussion item #2:  Morale of analysts in program.  Due largely to
compensation differences making the program feel as though it is still two
separate programs.  Commercial services needs more attention and focus.  Need
someone of a Celeste Roberts calibre to focus on the staffing piece.

Agreed:  Eliminating the compensation differences will help boost morale.
Additionally, there needs to be more focus and attention paid to the career
development of analysts.

Discussion item #3:  UT Spring recruiting.  Did not feel there were enough
events and concerned that executive leads were not asked to participate.

Agreed:  Celeste Roberts will follow-up with George Hope and Shelly Jones to
confirm number of events and whether dates were booked on executive lead's
calendars.  Bottom line, we want to ensure that presence on campus is not
minimized.

Discussion item #4:  Off-line discussion with Sally Beck regarding the
Performance Review Process and whether all analysts would be reviewed as one
pool

Agreed:   Per Sally Beck it was agreed that all analysts would be reviewed
together.  We will not separate commercial from commercial services but will
put all analysts on the table and review as one analyst pool.

 Please let me know if there are additional items that need to be captured.

Regards,
Celeste Roberts


-----Original Message-----
From: 	St. Clair, Carol
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:26 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Neal, Scott; Shively, Hunter S.; Martin, Thomas A.; Presto, Kevin M.; Belden, Tim
Cc:	Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	Consensual Terminations

As you are aware, legal is coordinating with the trading/origination groups in handling consensual termination transactions of our in-the-money positions with counterparties that are willing to do so.   Could you please spread the word that these transactions should NOT be done by entering into offsetting trades, but rather by entering into a Termination Agreement with our counterparty and the counterparty paying to Enron the agreed upon value.  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-3393 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
8774545506 (pager)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Frank:
How do Sep basis positions roll off?
John


Thanks Lou--looks good.  Given the amount of $$ we've spent the last 2 years
on this I hope we can hold them to this deal.  DF

05/03/2000 04:18 PM
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
05/03/2000 04:18 PM
05/03/2000 04:18 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: PG&E draft 2 for your review

drew - fyi....
---------------------- Forwarded by Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron on 05/03/2000
04:15 PM ---------------------------

05/03/2000 04:12 PM
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
05/03/2000 04:12 PM
05/03/2000 04:12 PM
To: Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Judy Kudym/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: PG&E draft 2 for your review

Mike - just a few suggestions - very nicely done!

	From:  Michel Nelson                           05/01/2000 04:16 PM

To: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: PG&E draft 2 for your review


To alert you to another item that may arise:  Some industrials have air
permits that restrict them to running for self-supply backup generation
only.  In such case, the air permit may have to be amended by the industrial
before it can sell to the grid.  Feel free to call upon Gov't Affairs if you
have a question about this.

Christi L Nicolay
05/01/2001 05:28 AM
To:
cc:

Subject: Interconnection: Easier for EPMI/EES to purchase from industrials

*****Please note that with the authorization below, interconnection issues
with the attached utility still need to be addressed.  (This includes
agreement, queue, facilities if needed, etc.)  Call us if you need
assistance.  Thanks.

Attached is FERC authorization for EPMI and EES to purchase power from
industrials NATIONWIDE (effective March 6, 2001--Does not expire).  The
industrial does not have to obtain its own power marketer license from FERC
(subject to EPMI and EES making certain after the fact quarterlty filings for
the industrials).

Specifics:

Owners of generating facilities located at business locations and used
primarily for back-up for self-generation (who will be "public utilities"
subject to the Federal Power Act only while they sell at wholesale) can sell
power at wholesale from such facilities to EPMI and EES without prior notice
under section 205 of FPA (would usually require 60 day advance notice
filing).
  -- Waives certain parts of the filing requirements for the industrial;
however, the industrial will still be subject to shortened filing
requirements for dispositions of facilities and interlocking positions while
they are selling at wholesale.
 -- EPMI and EES will make the FERC quarterly filings on behalf of the
industrials for any of these purchases.  Our report must show the names of
the industrial; aggregate amount of capacity and/or energy purchased from
each seller; and the aggregate compensation paid to each seller.
Accounting/commercial folks for EPMI and EES-- please make sure these
purchases are flagged in the accounting system, since the report will be
separate from our big quarterly reports.
 -- This does not authorize the retail industrial customer to violate any
rules or tariffs of its host utility.  This does not authorize an industrial
to resell power it purchases (only can sell what it generates); unless
otherwise allowed (or not precluded) by its retail tariff.

West Desk:  This is similar to the authorization that FERC gave last week to
purchases from industrials in WSCC.

____________________________________
On April 27, FERC issued an order granting EPMI and EES the authority to
purchase power from IPPs at market-based rates.  As the attached order
indicates, the effective date of the EPMI and EES rate schedules is March 6,
2001.

 - ER011394.wpd
 - ER011394.doc


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/30/2001 10:03 AM -----

 - 7-26-01 Ltr to T Hannigan.doc


The conversation was very positive (Glynn did not know anything about it at
first, but, looked into it and called Ken back Friday evening).  Glynn said
they were including the amount owed in their negotiations over the price for
the transmission assets and said they intended to pay all of their debts,
including this one, as soon as they get paid.  He said that this weekk would
be focussed on finalizing a deal for SCE given the threat of bankruptcy; the
discussions would then turn to PG&E.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	03/14/2001 07:03 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Steve:
Jim mentioned that Ken Lay was trying to talk to Glynn today about getting
the PX credit issue resolved.  Any progress made?

Best,
Jeff


We have our staff meetings the 1st and 3rd Wednesday at 130.  I missed the
last one, so I should make it to this one.

Kay


Paige,
	It has been requested that I fly back to Portland sometime today, so I will not get a chance to meet with you this week. I have attached a document with a  list of the variables that I thought needed to be captured to settle a consumption band contract. Please take a look at this and give me your input. Thank you very much for your help on this item.

				Chris
				503-807-8959
 -----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Smith, Paulett   On Behalf Of Paige Grumulaitis/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:10 PM
To:	Stokley, Chris
Subject:	Reschedule - Chris Stokley & Paige - 3AC1603 (11 Sept 10:00 AM CDT)
When:	Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:

Date and Time change


This says it all my friends!!!!!!

 - staff-Meeting (1).jpg


I attended the U.C. Berkeley POWER (Program on Workable Energy Regulation)
Conference on March 16.  Here is a brief report on the relevant parts.
Notably, the Lieff, Cabreser duo of Bill Bernstein and Barry Himmelstein
were there, listening carefully.

The program consisted of the presentation of 8 economic studies, followed by
comments from two discussants, followed by audience questions/comments.  The
following is a list of the papers and the discussants who presented with
slides, taken from the website of the U.C. Energy Institute,
http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei/conf2001/order_papers2001.html:  You can
click on this to see the slides, in PDF format.  The papers in green are not
particularly relevant for our purposes, and I won't say more about them
beyond the note in brackets.  The presenter's name is in bold.

  "Bidding Asymmetries in Multi-Unit Auctions: Implications of
Bid Function Equilibria in the British Spot Market for Electricity" by Greg
Crawford, Duke University, Joe Crespo, NERA, and Helen Tauchen, University
of North Carolina
  "Pricing and Firm Conduct in California's Deregulated
Electricity Market" by Steve Puller, UC Berkeley
   Discussion by Anjali Sheffrin, California
Independent System Operator
  "Identification and Estimation of Cost Functions Using
Observed Bid Data: An Application to Electricity Markets" by Frank Wolak,
Stanford University [A paper about economic "tools" to study power markets.]
  "Forward Contracts and the Curse of Market Power" by Jeffrey
Lien , University of Maryland
  "The Impact of Retail Rate Deregulation on Electricity
Consumption in San Diego" by James Bushnell and Erin Mansur, UC Berkeley
[This looks at whether consumption declined with price increases.  Not
much.]
  "Consumption and Home Energy Costs: How Prevalent is the
'Heat or Eat' Decision?" by Julie Berry Cullen, University of Michigan,
Leora Friedberg, University of Virginia, and Catherin Wolfram, UC Berkeley
[A macro study on how consumers change overall spending patterns when they
have to shell out more $$ for power.]
  "A Quantitative Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California's
Wholesale Electricity Market During Summer 2000" by Paul Joskow, MIT, and
Edward Kahn, Analysis Group
  "Electricity Restructuring and the Cost of Pollution
Reduction" by Dallas Burtraw, Karen Palmer, Ranjit Bharvirkar, and Anthony
Paul, Resources for the Future

Before I discuss the specific papers and presenters, one big picture point
needs to be made.  There was an unchallenged consensus at this conference
that the generators have exercised market power to the tune of billions of
dollars.  The focus was on how and how much, not whether.  The good news is
that I heard no evidence supporting any collusion theory; the thought was
that generators are making independent output and pricing decisions knowing
they could influence the market price given the auction rules and the
completely inelastic demand.  On the other hand, I would have to say that
the economic work on the tacit collusion hypothesis in incomplete at best.
The bad news is that the scale of potential overcharges is pretty staggering
-- >$5 billion.  The plaintiffs will be able to put together quite a damage
study.

Crespo, Bidding Asymmetries in UK:  This is a marginally relevant paper
examining whether bidders in the UK electricity auction markets behaved in a
leader-follower mode, i.e., asymmetrically.  Crespo's model shows that in a
uniform price-setting auction with clearing price rules, a price setter will
emerge and take all prices above marginal cost.  Thus, above marginal cost
pricing does not require coordination.  Crespo (from NERA) appeared
knowledgeable, but is not an inspiring speaker.  His paper also got roughed
up a bit in the audience questioning segment.

Puller, Pricing and Firm Conduct in California's Deregulated Electricity
Market:  This is a very relevant paper, as it tries to determine whether
market power (presumably) exercised in California was static or dynamic,
meaning the product of individual firm decisionmaking (static) or tacit
collusion (dynamic).  The period studied was 4/98 to 12/99.  Puller found
evidence of static market power consistent with so-called "Cournot pricing."
This theory posits that in an oligopoly firms will take their rivals'
observed price/output decisions as a given and decide how to maximize
profitability given that behavior.  He then tried to determine whether any
dynamic games were occurring, meaning a game where firms recognize their
interdependence and try to follow a "supergame trigger strategy" in which
firms try to induce favorable responses from rivals.  It's quite complicated
how he goes about this, but fundamentally he tries to correlate observed
output decisions with how a firm at that time might have expected a change
in its behavior to affect its future share of the market.  With this
methodology, Puller finds what he called "weak evidence" of forward-looking
dynamic pricing for a brief time in 1998, but not otherwise.  My impression
was that the evidence for 1998 was very weak, and the logic used to arrive
at this conclusion was also weak.

Puller then went at this a second time with a theory that attempts to
determine what a firm's "supply function" would look like if it was
exercising static and dynamic market power, and then comparing this to an
estimate of that firm's actual supply function.  I found this even more
speculative than the first theory.  Nonetheless, the results are basically
the same:  evidence of static, but not dynamic market power.

Puller took a lot of heat for the methodology of this paper during the
questioning segment.  He's not a dynamic speaker and does not appear to me
to be a strong expert candidate.

Anjali Sheffrin's commentary was very important.  She is the Director of
Market Analysis for CAISO.  After general comments on Crespo and Puller, she
launched in to a discussion of whether their models explained the California
experience.  This turned out to be a preview of the CAISO FERC filing of
last week, in which they allege $5.5 billion in market power-related
overcharges from May 200 to Feb. 2001.  That filing and Sheffrin's report
follow.  They are essential reading.

  <<2001032214541122276.pdf.pdf>>  <<2001032214585222924.pdf.pdf>>

Sheffrin maintains that it was the absence of imports during this period
that left the market power of the California generators unchecked.  This
permitted the in-state generators to engage in either economic or physical
withholding of power.  (Economic withholding is bidding a higher-than-needed
supply curve; physical withholding is cutting output at the plant.)  Her
study was intended to (1) Identify individual firms engaging in market power
activity, and (2) Analyze how each firms' actions set market clearing
prices.  She utilized full bidding data in CA ISO real time market for
each hour between May and Nov 2000, defined and categorized bidding patterns
and identified economic or physical withholding, and then calculated
bid-cost mark-up and a monopoly rent.  She found what she claimed was strong
evidence of both types of withholding, but that economic withholding is the
dominant bidding pattern used by the five large California generators.
While Sheffrin's study does not name names, it claims that "most of the five
in-state suppliers and many of the [16] large importers displayed bidding
patterns which were consistent with the exercise of market power."

Bernstein and Himmelstein were positively gleeful during this presentation.

On the question of collusion, Sheffrin's study is not terribly illuminating.
She maintains that "the dominant bidding pattern is consistent with two
characteristics of a supply function equilibrium model of oligopolist
pricing."  I take that to mean Cournot, which is a static, non-collusive
model.  However, when you read her study, you'll see the picture is not
entirely clear.

Lien, The Curse of Market Power:  This is only marginally relevant for us,
as its thesis is that forward-looking supply contracts are better for both
producers and society.  Everyone seemed to agree -- and were confused why we
needed a paper to prove it.  Lien (U. Md.) is young and not expert material.

Joskow and Kahn:  http://www.mit.edu/people/pjoskow/JK_PaperREVISED.pdf
(paper);  http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei/conf2001/Slides/Kahn_Slides.pdf
(Kahn's slides).   I'm sure many of you have already read this; everyone
should.  Prepared for SoCal Edison, it contends that 4 in-state generators
(Reliant, Dynegy, AES/Williams, and Southern/Mirant) exercised market power
by withholding capacity during the summer or 2000.

J&K use publicly available data on loads, market prices and generation to
(a) quantify combined effects of "market fundamentals" on market prices, (b)
calculate "price gap" (difference between actual prices and "competitive"
market benchmarks), (c) account for quantify effects of ISO's ancillary
services requirements and forced outages, and then (d) calculate the "output
gap" for high priced hours, meaning the difference between observed and
maximum profitable levels of generation.  They conclude that prices were far
in excess of the competitive benchmark and that the 4 in-state generators
could have produced more power at competitive prices but chose not to.
Hence, market power was exercised.

Kahn, the Analysis Group economist who presented, is a very colorful and
rather undisciplined advocate of his position.  He threw around allegations
of conspiracy rather casually, but mostly to be funny.  I couldn't tell
whether he believed his study proved that; I don't think it even speaks to
it.  But Bernstein and Himmelstein applauded him when he finished, grinning
ear to ear.

Severin Borenstein, UC Berkeley and the conference director, was supposed to
comment on J&K, but hardly did.  He said that the generators would have been
stupid not to exercise market power given the supply/demand conditions and
the market rules, and argued that permitting long term contracts and
requiring real-time residential pricing were the solutions to all of this.
Borenstein was the best expert material I saw at this conference, and the
fact he took a pass on the details of the J&K paper is puzzling to me.  It
made me wonder whether he already has a horse in this race, or perhaps is
trying to "stay above it all."

Hope this is useful.

Regards,
Dan

Daniel M. Wall
Latham & Watkins
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 1900
San Francisco, CA 94111-2562
Direct:  (415) 395-8240
Main:  (415) 391-0600
Fax:  (415) 395-8095
dan.wall@lw.com

This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or
attorney work product for the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any
review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express
permission is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender and delete all copies.

 - 2001032214541122276.pdf.pdf
 - 2001032214585222924.pdf.pdf


Read about the Enron Xcelerator in eBiz.

Also in this issue:
An update on Dabhol Power Company
Northern Border Partners & Global Strategic Sourcing team up online
Enron's latest accolades

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz February 16, 2001."


These troubled times mandate that Enron take a fresh look at our contingency plans for conducting business away from the office.  Bob Superty has asked me to put together a survey on processes and equipment that could be used if schedulers could not get into the office and use normal business processes and resources.

Please forward this memo and ask your respective schedulers to take a moment to fill in the requested data from your desk spreadsheets below.  We would like to have all responses received before November 1st.

Please e-mail all responses to Richard Pinion with an updated Excel spreadsheet attached.  I will put together a master sheet from the individual replies.

thx
Richard Pinion


Attached is the CRM revised list of reference credits to be posted on-line
(not initially for on-line trading).  The list is substantively the same as
we received, except for greater precision on company name punctuation and the
deletion of the following names:

 Cisco Systems
 New Jersey Natural Gas Company
 Pennzoil-Quaker State Company
 Texas New Mexico Power Company
 Honeywell International Inc.
 Lexmark International, Inc.
 MediaOne Group Inc.
 National Service Industries Inc.
 Raychem Corp
 Sundstrand Corp.
 Time Warner Inc
 US West Communications Inc.

The above names were deleted for a variety of reasons, but NOT due to weak or
questionable credit strength.  Rather, the deletions are typically due to an
inconsistency of names between SEC document filings and S&P rating.  The
inconsistency is most likely reconcilable through and analysis and
understanding of the corporate structure and recourse mechanics for each
company.  CRM can address these issues and potentially add names after the
initial launch.

Rod


Carol St. Clair is the appropriate attorney to review these financial
products.

	Kevin Meredith@ENRON
	03/23/2001 08:24 AM

		 To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT, Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT, Shari Mao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlie Hoang/HOU/ECT, Laurie
Lee/NA/Enron
		 cc: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EOL PRODUCT TYPE APPROVAL for 5 Financial product types (Clickpaper
to EOL migration)

Your review and approval of the following 5 product types in the EOL
Datamanager is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for
approval at the bottom of this e-mail). If you have any questions please call
me at ext. 39555.

US Newsprint Fin Swap      USD/MT/M

A US Newsprint Financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp.
under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price
submitted by Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in respect of the
Notional Quantity per Determination Period. The Notional Quantity per
Determination Period shall be the volume submitted by Counterparty on the
Website. Each calendar month during the term of the Transaction will be a
Determination Period. The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days after the
Floating Price is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the Index for the
relevant Determination Period.

US Packaging Fin Swap      USD/ST/M

A US Packaging Financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp.
under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price
submitted by Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in respect of the
Notional Quantity per Determination Period. The Notional Quantity per
Determination Period shall be the volume submitted by Counterparty on the
Website. Each calendar month during the term of the Transaction will be a
Determination Period. The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days after the
Floating Price is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the Index for the
relevant Determination Period.

US Recycled ONP #8 Fin Swap     USD/ST/M

A US Recycled Financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp. under
which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price submitted
by Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in respect of the Notional
Quantity per Determination Period. The Notional Quantity per Determination
Period shall be the volume submitted by Counterparty on the Website. Each
calendar month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination
Period. The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days after the Floating Price
is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the Index for the relevant
Determination Period.

US Recycled OCC #11 Fin Swap     USD/ST/M

A US Recycled Financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp. under
which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price submitted
by Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in respect of the Notional
Quantity per Determination Period. The Notional Quantity per Determination
Period shall be the volume submitted by Counterparty on the Website. Each
calendar month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination
Period. The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days after the Floating Price
is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the Index for the relevant
Determination Period.

US OSB Fin Swap       USD/MSF

A US OSB Financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp. under
which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price submitted
by Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in respect of the Notional
Quantity per Determination Period. The Notional Quantity per Determination
Period shall be the volume submitted by Counterparty on the Website. Each
calendar month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination
Period. The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days after the Floating Price
is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the Index for the relevant
Determination Period.
==============================================================================
=====

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


Tana,

See attached for all Live Forcenergy deals.

Thanks,
Joe


The Boston Differential for August 2001 is ($.1166).  I want to understand the contract better before I give you the Sep price.

Ruth, you and I are chatting about this today I hope.

Kam, I'm guessing this becomes an O&A issue each month.  I don't know if you need to be involved or not.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donlevy-Lee, Kelly
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Cc:	Laporte, Nicole
Subject:	FW: Boston Gas

Hi Chris,

I realize that you are getting bugged from a few of us in Canada for the Boston Differential numbers.  I am in Accounting and I am in desperate need of the Boston Differential for August and September so that I can finish my invoicing for the month.  I really have to have these numbers by the end of the day today (latest).  Sorry for being a pest, but I am starting to panic!  Please send these numbers to me or Nicole Laporte, as soon as possible.

Thanks,
Kelly

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wells, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 1:18 PM
To:	Vallejo, Stacey; Donlevy-Lee, Kelly
Subject:	FW: Boston Gas

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Laporte, Nicole
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 1:15 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Cc:	Wells, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Boston Gas

Chris,
We just require August and September, we already have July.
Would it possible to get the differential number before Wednesday? Our Accounting group requires this number for invoicing and they are a few weeks late with their August invoice and require the differential immediately.
Please let me know,
Thanks,
Nicole

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 12:51 PM
To:	Laporte, Nicole
Subject:	RE: Boston Gas

Sorry about the delay.  I'm starting to look at this again.  I know you need August and September.  Did you say you also need July?

I don't know if Canada makes any money off this deal but my book is taking a beating.  Ruth Concannon and I are meeting Wednesday to discuss this deal.  There are some other things going on with this deal that she is aware of.  I should have your prices by them.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Laporte, Nicole
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:57 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Boston Gas

Chris,
Attached is a spreadsheet listing the differential since January 1998.
Please let me know as soon as you know something!
Thanks!
Nicole
 << File: BostonGasDifferential.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:47 AM
To:	Laporte, Nicole
Cc:	Singla, Kimat
Subject:	FW: Boston Gas

Nicole, would you send us the last price you were given please?

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Singla, Kimat
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:35 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Boston Gas

Chris, I remember there used to be one excel spreadsheet on Boston. But I can't find any on my CPU, perhaps it got lost when they upgraded my CPU. Do you have it? Let me know what we need to do. Thanks.

Kimat

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 12:44 PM
To:	Laporte, Nicole; Singla, Kimat
Subject:	Boston Gas

Nicole, I have the Boston Gas confirmation letter.  Thanks.

Kimat, are you familiar with the Boston Gas worksheet Dick Jenkins would update to calculate the Tenn Z6 city gate price?  It wasn't very big, and Dick would have me verify the Iroquois and Tenn transport variable cost.


<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">

<BASE HREF="http://football299.fantasy.sportsline.com/mp/">

Attention Fantasy Players! Cant find that perfect gift? Let MVP.com make it easy for you! Save 10% on your next purchase when you purchase a Gift Certificate from now until 12/27/01. Click Here for Details.

Brought to you by

<MAP NAME="menu.map">
<AREA shape="rect" coords="0, 1, 83, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/217/sffer1218e.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="83, 1, 166, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/226/sffer1218c.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="166, 1, 249, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffer1218v.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="249, 1, 332, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/163/sffer1218t.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="332, 1, 415, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/3/sffer1218ftl.cgi">

</MAP>

You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for
    CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule,
    or turn off these reports please
    click here

NFL Reports, Player Updates

Latest NFL Player News

James Stewart, RB DET - Hunter Updated 12/23/01
Stewart suffered a sprained ankle early in Sunday's game at Pittsburgh. He was replaced by Lamont Warren in the first quarter, and Stewart did not return.

Cameron Cleeland, TE NO - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01
Cleeland injured his Achilles tendon on Sunday. He is not expected to play again this season.

Ahman Green, RB GB - Hunter Updated 12/23/01
Green left Sunday's game in the fourth quarter with labored breathing. He was replaced by Dorsey Levens.

Todd Bouman, QB MIN - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01
Bouman was able to start Sunday's game, but he re-injured his thumb in the first quarter and was replaced by Spergon Wynn.

Wesley Walls, TE CAR - Free Agent
Updated 12/23/01
Walls was able to play in Sunday's game despite an ankle injury, but he left the game before halftime after spraining his left knee.

Martin Gramatica, K TB - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01
Gramatica injured his hamstring in the fourth quarter on Sunday. He hurt himself on a PAT attempt, but Gramatica is expected to play on December 29.

Todd Bouman, QB MIN - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01

Bouman is now listed as probable for Sunday's game. He should be able to start against the Jaguars, but he may play with some pain in his thumb.

Jeff Graham, WR SD - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01
Graham probably won't play Sunday at Kansas City because of the death of his father in a car accident, coach Mike Riley said Friday. If Graham doesn't play, Trevor Gaylor will start in his place and Nate Turner will be signed off the practice squad. The Chargers are already missing their No. 3 receiver, Tim Dwight, due to complications of a collapsed lung.

Antowain Smith
, RB NE - JWillie Updated 12/23/01
Smith rushed for a career-high 156 yards and a touchdown Saturday. He has been one of the best runners in the AFC and will help carry your team to Fantasy glory.

Steve McNair, QB TEN - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01
McNair played Saturday despite suffering from back spasms all week. He played well, throwing a touchdown pass in the second half. Expect him to be a solid No. 1 QB.

Jeff Garcia, QB SF - JWillie Updated 12/23/01

Garcia, whose practice time was limited all week, played in Saturday's game. He admitted afterwards that he has a cracked rib. He played with extra padding, saying it didn't greatly affect his throws. Garcia might not be at full strength in the remaining weeks but he will still be a solid No. 1 Fantasy QB.

Eddie George, RB TEN - Tori Updated 12/23/01
George played in Saturday's game despite suffering from an ankle injury. He left in the third quarter because of a neck injury but returned to the game.

Oronde Gadsden, WR MIA - Matty Updated 12/23/01

Gadsden did not play in Saturday's game against the Patriots because of a hamstring injury. Chris Chambers started in his absence.

Fred Beasley, RB SF - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01
Beasley broke his right hand. He will probably be sidelined for the rest of the regular season.

Joe Horn, WR NO - Matty Updated 12/21/01
Horn is once again performing like an elite Fantasy receiver. He is a must-start player during the final weeks of the NFL season.

Maurice Smith, RB ATL - Frank Updated 12/21/01
A banged-up Smith hasn't done much statistically in recent weeks. Don't depend on him during the Fantasy playoffs.

Donald Hayes, WR CAR - Martin Updated 12/21/01
Hayes may step back into the forefront this week as the No. 1 wideout in place of Muhsin Muhammad. He isn't very explosive, however, and won't help Fantasy teams much during Weeks 15 through 17.

Chris Weinke, QB CAR - Tori Updated 12/21/01
Consider Weinke as a backup during the Fantasy playoffs. He lacks the weapons to post better-than-average numbers, but he is a good option if you need an emergency QB.

Kurt Warner, QB STL - Hunter Updated 12/21/01
Warner should guide many Fantasy teams to success during the playoffs. Expect fine numbers from him the rest of the way.

Rich Gannon
, QB OAK - Martin Updated 12/21/01
Gannon has been a top-flight Fantasy QB this year. He will be a key player on many title teams, and should never be benched.

Randy Moss, WR MIN - Russell Updated 12/21/01
Moss started off slow this season but has once again been one of the best wideouts. Don't hesitate to start him during your playoff run.

Marvin Minnis, WR KC - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01

Minnis hasn't done much to help Fantasy owners this year. Don't use him during the remaining weeks of the NFL season.

Michael Westbrook, WR WAS - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01
Westbrook has been inconsistent this season as a Fantasy player. He will be a good No. 2 at best during your playoffs.

Rod Gardner, WR WAS - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01
Gardner has been very inconsistent this season. Unless you play in a deeper league, starting Gardner isn't advisable.

Tony Richardson, RB KC - Neal/McKay Updated 12/21/01
Richardson hasn't been a consistent scoring threat this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy playoffs.

Tony Gonzalez, TE KC - Russell Updated 12/21/01
Gonzalez hasn't played as well as expected this year. Still, he is too talented to bench during the Fantasy playoffs.

Brett Favre, QB GB - Frank Updated 12/21/01

Favre has been one of the best QBs this season. Count on him to help lead your team to Fantasy glory.

Trent Green, QB KC - Bass/Hull Updated 12/21/01
Green has been an inconsistent Fantasy QB this year. He is a risky start during the rest of the season.

Bill Schroeder, WR GB - Frank Updated 12/21/01
Schroeder has had a solid season. Look for him to be a reliable No. 2 wideout during your postseason.

Matt Hasselbeck, QB SEA - Bass/Hull Updated 12/21/01
Hasselbeck has been a big disappointment this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy postseason.

More Updates

Transactions, View

Transactions

Date	Time	Player	Team	Transaction	Effective
Cost

12/21/01	 6:49 AM	Brown, Kris	Martin	Signed	Week 15	$2.5

12/21/01	 6:49 AM	Taylor, Fred	Martin	Released	Week 15	$2.5

Schedule, Breakdown

Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.
Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com

FB10SP


I'll be there, too.

"David Hunt" <drhunt@watervalley.net> on 06/01/2001 05:01:40 PM
Please respond to <drhunt@watervalley.net>
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE:

I believe so! I have it on my calendar at 11:00 a.m.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 2:35 PM
To: drhunt@watervalley.net
Subject: Re:

David,

Do you know if we are meeting on Monday?  I haven't heard the final word.

Kay


Fernley,
On January 25, 1999, I had breakfast in London with a shaking Richard Sage
who recounted the tail of Barry threatening his bonus and employment for
doing exactly what Jeff Skilling told him to do in the previous November.
Subsequently, Richard was "moved" from his position and Barry promoted.   If
that is dealing with the situation, this actually reflects on your
credibility.  If you think that an open communication, independent back
office message was sent to the back and middle office in Houston and London
by virtue of your promotion of Barry twice in 12 months, then you are sorely
mistaken.
On February 2, 2000 the Arthur Andersen team, including Tom Bauer, John
Sorrells and Jim Brown stated that Barry was an issue in satisfactorily
completing the Audit tasks from London.
I am not sure what we are attempting to accomplish here.  You have dismissed
my "advice" and you need to do what you need to do.
If the goal is to get me to change my view, you have a big hole to dig out
of.  I obviously can't change your point of view.  I still feel a
responsiblity to express the views that I have and others are afraid to
surface. It is the inability for people to be heard and feel that they will
be supported when they step out on a limb that caused us to lose more money
trading than we ever have from a little office in the middle of nowhere.
Need I go on.

Let us stop the e-mail wars now.  They serve no productive purpose.
Ted

Fernley Dyson
02/09/2000 04:56 AM
To: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Trading Support Operations - London

Ted,

We have had discussions about Barry in the past and I have followed-up on
specific instances you have mentioned - I believe they date back to 1998 and
prior to my first hand experience of working with Barry throughout 1999, and
the people who raised concerns then acknowledge that the environment has
changed since then. We are not so Barry-dependent. We have a team of quality
risk management professionals as evidenced by the fact that it is the primary
recruiting ground for the RAC team (David Port, Oliver Gaylard).

Barry's role is much less hands-on now and he is not our candidate for the
Global Products position - this will continue to be Kevin Sweeney. The role I
suggest for Barry is the high level co-ordination of the operations team -
his energy, enthusiasm and ability to execute on a plan, combined with his
considerable institutional knowledge, making a superior candidate difficult
to find. Frankly, I suggested Steve Young not for additional depth, but to
address the relationship issue that clearly exists - I do not belittle this
issue, and while I don't think that anyone can point to any "prosecutable"
offences that Barry may have committed in recent history, his management
style doesn't help to promote the view that he is totally impartial and
objective. I will say that he has always been open and frank (very frank)
with me - indeed if Mally and Sweeney had been as open we may have had a
different story to tell on Helsinki.

As an aside, I have not been involved in or consulted on the 'World Tour',
although I know that Barry suggested this sort of thing to Sally a few weeks
back. I think it is great that Brent Price is involved, but we would be happy
to contribute staff to this too.

Regards

Fernley

To: Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Rick Buy, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Trading Support Operations - London

Fernley,
As we discussed earlier this year, I have serious concerns about Barry that I
think are both well-founded and reasonably well documented.  To be fair, I
will say that since Q1 of last year, I have not seen any FURTHER
"prosecutable" offenses and he has made some attempts at being more
communicative.  However, I am clearly unwilling to stake my career on his
transformation, particulary with as influential person as John Sherriff in
charge of the office.  Probably more to the point,
it continues to concern me that London has not developed an operations team
that is not so Barry-dependent.  Evidence to this effect are, the fact that
he is your only candidate for the Global Products position, that someone from
Houston has to be part of the "World Tour"  in Europe (Brent Price), that
your candidates  for a senior interim operations head in Helsinki was David
Port or Richard Sage, and that your suggestion for additional depth is Steve
Young.

Further for the record, I believe that I am not the only one with whom Barry
has a credibility issue - Arthur Andersen, other Global Products personnell,
and other risk people in London have expressed similar concerns to me - I
just happen to be the most vocal.
Ted

Fernley Dyson
02/08/2000 04:07 PM
To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Trading Support Operations - London

Rick,

Not wishing to delay the comprehensive review of our trading support
function, particularly as it relates to our Global Products business, we
already have Barry Pearce taking a lead in this area.

The issue of concern is whether this should be an interim measure or a more
permanent solution.  Well - nothing is permanent in Enron and I think Barry
understands this as well as anybody. If we had a more suitable candidate, we
would give him/her the job.

I have seen Barry develop and mature over the last 12 months along with the
team that we have built around him. I'm convinced that he can add significant
value by drawing the Global Products support functions 'in to the fold'.
However, he clearly has a credibility issue with Ted in particular and,
whilst I do not share Ted's views, I do not hold Barry out as a saint and I
can see recurring problems if such a key relationship is not well grounded.

I suggest that we continue to search for a candidate - known and trusted
within Houston, who can instill confidence there. Steve Young (head of RAC in
London) may be an interesting option, although I'm sure he would not be easy
to replace. In the meantime we need Barry to take things forward and I will
be monitoring the situation very closely.

Regards

Fernley.


Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2001 09:10 AM -----

	Larry Decker@ENRON
	05/30/2001 01:26 PM

		 To: Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Forward Contract Definition

Carol,

Attached are the S. 420 and HR 333 as passed, respectively, by the Senate and
the House.  As you know, the bills are prepared to go to conference, however
Senate leadership has not yet figured out how they will organize the
conference.

The language of interest to you is located in Title IX, Sec. 901(d), found on
page 292 of HR 333 and on page 307 of S. 420.

Thanks,
Larry

Chris Long
05/30/2001 12:30 PM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Decker/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Forward Contract Definition

Will you please forward S. 420 and H.R. 333 to Carol via e-mail.

----- Forwarded by Chris Long/Corp/Enron on 05/30/2001 12:29 PM -----

	Carol St Clair@ECT
	05/30/2001 10:04 AM

		 To: Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Forward Contract Definition

Chris:
Thanks.  I'm checking with Vicki Sharp to see if we want to do anything.
Where can  locate the latest version of the bill that would have the proposed
changes to the forward contract definition?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Chris Long@ENRON
	05/29/2001 04:52 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Forward Contract Definition

Carol - While it never too late to suggest a change, given the political
situation I would be hesitant to offer anything more than a "clarification".
While I would not spend a huge amount of time on it, I suggest you examine if
there are any changes. Depending on what happens in the Senate (now that it
is in Democratic hands), the process can be reopened and we could have an
opportunity to offer suggested changes (or it kill the bill all together).

	Carol St Clair@ECT
	05/29/2001 02:41 PM

		 To: chris.long@enron.com
		 cc: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Forward Contract Definition

Chris:
Would it be too late to suggest changes to the definition of "forward
contracts" in the Bankruptcy Code in order to improve our position with
respect to the physical supply contracts that EES enters into?  I am not sure
what chnages we would want, but was wondering if there was any opportunity to
suggest a change.  Let me know what you think.  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2001 12:06 PM -----

	Caroline Schaeffer@ENRON
	05/17/2001 02:59 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Kathy Neal/Enron@EnronXGate, Sheila Walton/Enron@EnronXGate, Michelle
Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Contract for Jane McBride (Confidential)

Alan,
Change in plans - ended up coming back to Tokyo and forgoing the trip to
Houston.   I'm still obtaining the data from McLagan, but as soon as I have
it, will be able to let you know how Jane's comp compares with the market.
In terms of drawing up the contract, I'll work with Kathy and Michelle.  I
would suggest that Michelle liase with Hideo Ohta-san at B&M in Tokyo.
Thanks,
Caroline

Caroline Schaeffer
Sr. Human Resources Representative
Enron Japan
caroline.schaeffer@enron.com

	Alan Aronowitz@ECT
	05/15/2001 11:01 PM

		 To: Caroline Schaeffer/AP/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Contract for Jane McBride (Confidential)

----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2001 09:01 AM -----

	Alan Aronowitz
	05/15/2001 09:01 AM

		 To: Caroline Schaeffer/AP/Enron@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Kathy Neal/Enron@EnronXGate, Sheila Walton/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Re: Contract for Jane McBride (Confidential)

I'm around all week. I would like to visit with you on Wednesday if you have
time then. Please call me or my assistant, Nita Garcia, 713-853-9559, to
schedule something.

Alan

	Caroline Schaeffer@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	05/15/2001 12:53 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Kathy Neal/Enron@EnronXGate@ECT, Sheila Walton/Enron@EnronXGate@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Contract for Jane McBride (Confidential)

Alan,
Thanks for your note.  I will be in Houston Wednesday-Friday if you wish to
meet and discuss.  Unfortunately, I don't have market data with me, but
should be able to gather some information from McLagan by the end of the
week.  One issue that needs to be addressed is the unenforceability of fixed
term employment contracts in Japan.  Under Japanese law, a fixed term
contract which is longer than one year binds only the employer - no
obligation is created on the part of the employee beyond the first year of
the contract.  I have some ideas as to how we might address.  Let me know if
you have time to meet later this week.
Thanks,
Caroline

Caroline Schaeffer
Sr. Human Resources Representative
Enron Japan
caroline.schaeffer@enron.com

	Alan Aronowitz@ECT
	05/15/2001 05:38 AM

		 To: Caroline Schaeffer/AP/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Sheila Walton/Enron@EnronXGate, Kathy Neal/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Contract for Jane McBride (Confidential)

Last week I spoke with Mark Haedicke (who I report to within Legal), Mike
McConnell and Joe Hirl about offering to Jane McBride a two-year employment
contract. All three are on board with this idea. Mark will be in Tokyo later
this week and early next week (he will be in the Tokyo office on Monday I
believe). I want to work with you (and Sheila Walton/Kathy Neal of HR here in
Houston) on the contract details. Our internal HR lawyer, Michelle Cash,
would also need to be involved in the drafting of the contract working with
Japanese outside counsel. Currently, we were thinking about a signing cash
amount as well as some stock options at signing. In light of the market, do
you have a feel for what those numbers should be?

Please feel free to contact me here in the office (713-853-3214) or at home
(713-667-0525) as soon as you get this message so we can discuss further.

Regards, Alan


HI Christie:

The telephone number in EB1938 is:  713/853-3135.  Have a safe trip.

Shirley

Christie Patrick
12/12/2000 10:36 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Follow-up Meeting on Wharton

Shirley,

Unless my flights change, I can call in from my cell phone--what number shall
I dial?

Thanks!

--Christie.


We would need to protest, but of course strategically.  Can we discuss
anything that goes out?

Roger

Mona L Petrochko@ENRON
11/02/2000 04:48 PM

To:   Roger Yang, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:   jdasovic@.enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lysa
Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  PG&E A/L Setting Interim Value for Hydro

The phoenix keeps rising.  PG&E has submitted a new advice letter seeking
to establish an interim valuation for its remaining hydro assets at $2.8
billion effective June 23,00.

We have 20 days from October 26 to protest.  I would assume we will want to
protest, unless I hear differently.

Thanks.


<<Budget Brief for May 8th.doc>>

Good afternoon:

Attached is a weekly Budget Brief produced by Assemblyman George Runner and
the Assembly Republican Fiscal staff.  If you have any questions, please do
not hesitate to call me.

RSC

Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
Phone:(916) 319-2005

 - Budget Brief for May 8th.doc


Daren - there is flow at meter 1386 for Jan 1-3.  The average flow is
828/day.  The last deal associated with this meter is 150325, Dec. 1-4,
2000.  The counterparty is Hampshire.  Could you please look at this and let
me know if you put a deal in for these days?

Thanks.

AL


EGM will be doing the financial deal which i understand is a collar on South American ADRs - so ENA would be my guess.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:16 AM
To:	Rohauer, Tanya
Subject:	RE: Bear Stearns International Ltd.

Yes, I've been contacted by Paul Puchot in Global Finance.  There is some type of meeting this afternoon.  It is not clear to anyone which Enron company is involved.  FYI - I was in  the midst of negotiating an ISDA with BSIL for Enron Corp. with respect to potential forward deals.

Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rohauer, Tanya
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:51 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	FW: Bear Stearns International Ltd.

Are you working on Bruin?  Davis Thames told me Kristina Mordaunt is leading, but if involves ENA ISDA makes sense for you to be working with them on that portion.

Thanks,
Tanya

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boyd, Samantha
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:36 PM
To:	Dawson, Matthew; Cooper, Edmund
Cc:	Jones, Tanya; Rohauer, Tanya
Subject:	Bear Stearns International Ltd.

I received a phone call from Nancy Bauer with Bear Stearns International Ltd. ("Bear Stearns").  Nancy has  informed me that Bear Stearns will be doing a large trade with Enron North America Corp. ("ENA") very soon.  Their goal is to get an ISDA Master Agreement in place quickly.  Bear Stearns would like for the ISDA Master Agreement with ENA to mirror the ISDA Master Agreement dated July 3, 2000 between Enron Credit Limited and Bear Stearns.

My review of our Lotus Notes database did not reveal that Enron Credit Limited has a Master Agreement with Bear Stearns.  If this Master Agreement has been executed, please make an entry for it in Lotus Notes.  Also, please e-mail me a copy of the execution version of the Enron Credit Limited and Bear Stearns Master Agreement for legal and credit in Houston to review.  Since time is of the essence, your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.

Samantha M. Boyd
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3803
Houston, Texas 77002
Ph:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490


Chris,

For the following dates, we do not have Cycle 7 data in the database for PG&E (Pipeline #17).  These should have been reloaded from the saved html files.  Do we have these files, and if so, can you load the appropriate dates, in order the get the Cycle 7 data in for these points.

2/8/01
3/7/01
3/8/01
3/9/01
3/10/01
3/11/01
3/12/01

For the following dates, the data we have for Cycle 7 in the database does not match that in the spreadsheet that the west desk maintains.  We need to verify from the saved webpages whether our data is correct, and if it isn't, get it corrected.  I could check them, if you could print out the saved pages for me.

2/12/01
2/27/01
3/1/01
4/11/01
4/16/01
4/17/01
4/18/01

For both of these, the actual date of capture will be several days later than the effective date for cycle 7.

Mat


Call Bob's asst and see if I need to participate. I was supposed to be on the
last call, which never happened.
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 12:20 PM -----

	Stephanie Truss@ENRON
	11/29/2000 03:12 PM

		 To: Alan Black@ECT, Richard B Sanders@ECT, Chris Behney/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: jfeldman@forensics.com
		 Subject: E-Mail Retention Policy

Joan Feldman is available on December 12 to conduct a conference call on the
e-mail retention policy.  Please let me know if you will be available on that
date.  Thank you.


Mary,

HPLC currently has a gas purchase agreement (global #96014987) in place with
Calpine that extends through 5/31/2001.  Sitara deal no. 133259 correctly has
this contract attached to it.  Effective 11/1/1998 the contract was amended
releasing Gouger wells no. 5 & 6.  These wells were apparently the only
producing wells behind this point.  Evidence being no measured volumes in
MIPS.  There are however other non producing wells behind this point.  Is
your Sept & Oct UA4 issue the direct result of volumes being scheduled at
meter no. 4229?  If so, for November, the nom at this point will be taken to
1mmbtu/d until the wells behind this point began to produce.

As far as meter 6835 (Roos #1 C/P) is concerned, HPLC also has a contract
(#96003771) in place with Cokinos Nat Gas that is currently in an "evergreen"
status.  The aforementioned wells were released from the Calpine contract;
however, they were not added behind meter 6835.  Therefore, I do not agree
that the deal (133259) should be edited to change the meter.

Hopefully this information is useful!

vlt
x3-6353

Mary Poorman@ENRON
10/23/2000 02:06 PM
To: Katherine Benedict/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Meter 984229 - Roos Common Point - Trade Zone 18

I am not sure who should handle this, so, I shared the "wealth".  On deal
ticket 133259, purchase from Calpine, the deal is input at meter 4229, which,
per the email below, was terminated.  I have an unresolvable UA4 issue at
meter 4229 for September and for October.  I have changed the meter
designation for November forward, however, I receive an error in Sitara when
I attempt to change either the prior or current month.  This deal should have
been changed to meter 6835 effective back in February of this year.  Please
let me know what I can do to resolve this issue ASAP.

Thanks,

Mary
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Poorman/NA/Enron on 10/23/2000 02:01
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Cheryl Jones                           10/03/2000 08:55 AM

To: Katherine Benedict/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Meter 984229 - Roos Common Point - Trade Zone 18

I just talked to the tech-Bobby Husky and he confirmed that meter 984229 has
been removed. Now the other roos station is 986835.

Thanks,
C.J. x67787
---------------------- Forwarded by Cheryl Jones/GPGFIN/Enron on 10/03/2000
08:51 AM ---------------------------

Katherine Benedict@ECT
09/20/2000 10:01 AM
To: Cheryl Jones/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Meter 984229 - Roos Common Point - Trade Zone 18

Cheryl,

FYI  - Here is the message from Mary Poorman in Logistics.

Mary,

Cheryl is going to call the field and find out if this meter should still be
included on the termination list and also see if the field people see any gas
flow on the meter.

Thanks,

Kathy

---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine Benedict/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000
09:56 AM ---------------------------

Mary Poorman@ENRON
09/20/2000 09:48 AM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Katherine Benedict/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Meter 984229 - Roos Common Point - Trade Zone 18

Kathy and I are trying to clean up an unaccounted for issue at the above
referenced meter.  The system (Pops) does not show a BAV flow or an actual
flow for prior months.  Kathy phoned measurement to inquire about Mips
volumes and was informed that this meter is on a disabled status list back to
February, 2000.  I am showing a purchase from Calpine at this meter (deal
ticket 133259) on gathering agreement

I would greatly appreciate your help in determining the current status of
this meter and this deal.  Please forward any information you may have.

Thank you for your time and patience,

Mary


here are the settles, thanks.

John


We recently asked you to create an eSpeak "wish list" for us.  The response
was tremendous and, in some cases, very creative.  Your fellow employees
asked for everyone from Britney Spears to George Bush.  In all, we received
requests for 61persons outside of Enron to host an eSpeak event.  We thought
you might like to know who your colleagues find interesting, so we've
provided a sampling of the suggestions below.  Here are the top ten most
requested eSpeakers.

10.  Jack Welch, CEO, General Motors
9.  Scott McNeally, CEO, Sun Microsystems
8.  Satisfied Enron Customers
7.  Stephen Covey, author, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People
6.  Oprah Winfrey, talkshow host
5.  General Colin Powell, former Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, U.S.A.
4.  Alan Greenspan, Chairman, Federal Reserve, U.S.A.
3.  Former U.S. President George Bush
2.  Bill Gates, CEO, Microsoft
1.  Texas Governor George W. Bush

While we can't make any promises, we will do our best to bring in at least
some of these special guests.  If you have any contacts who could help us get
in touch with these guest speakers, please let us know at ethink@enron.com.
Everybody needs a little help now and then, even eSpeak.

There were plenty of internal speakers requested, as well.  Those requests
should be somewhat easier to meet, although scheduling time with some of our
colleagues can be quite a task!

Thank you all for your participation.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 12/28/2000
09:50 AM ---------------------------

Hunter S Shively
12/28/2000 07:15 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Larry,

I was able to scan my 98 & 99 tax returns into Adobe.  Here they are plus the
excel file is a net worth statement.  If you have any trouble downloading or
printing these files let me know and I can fax them to you.   Let's talk
later today.

Phillip

P.S.  Please remember to get Jim Murnan the info. he needs.


Thanks man!  Just for old time's sake, I'll drop by Pacific Springs and
bounce a few off the ole' shack this summer!

From: Steve Kirk/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/08/2001 10:56 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FW: Organization Announcement

Congatulations Drew!  I have mixed emotions on your leaving Omaha.  On the
downside I'm sincerely going to miss your day-to-day presence that brings
thoughtful incites, hard work and a fun zest-for-life atmosphere to the
office.  On the upside (jokingly) I'll have one less golfer aiming for my
back windows this summer.  Good luck!

 -----Original Message-----
From:  ETS General Announcement/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-ETS+20General+20Announcement_ET+26S_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com
]  On Behalf Of Stan Horton, Chairman & CEO@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:58 PM
To: Enron Transportation Services Operations@ENRON
Subject: Organization Announcement

Michael Moran, currently Managing Director and General Counsel for ETS, has
decided to retire after a distinguished 27-year career with Enron.   Mike has
been a conscience and a statesman of our organization and it is hard for me
to imagine the ETS organization without Mike.

Fortunately, Drew Fossum, currently Vice President and General Counsel for
Northern Natural Gas and Transwestern, has accepted my offer to become Vice
President and General Counsel of ETS effective April 1, 2001.  Drew will
relocate to Houston and report to me in his new role.

To assist with transition issues and special projects, Mike has agreed to
stay on board for several months as Managing Director and Special Counsel to
the Chairman and will continue to report to me.

Please join me in congratulating Drew on his new assignment and thanking Mike
for his many contributions to ETS and Enron.


I don't know who has been saving these daily.  Can you tell whoever on the west desk to use the new file instead.  They are for the estate and need to keep them away from the Netco files.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bhatia, Randy
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 9:42 AM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	RE: broker quotes

are we saving the files out there everyday?  do the traders do/know this?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 9:40 AM
To:	Love, Phillip M.; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Palmer, B. Scott; Kulic, Sladana-Anna; Bhatia, Randy
Cc:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	broker quotes

The files for the broker quotes have been moved from the Netco file to O:\erms\1intra\broker quotes.  Those will be used for the estate.

Please let anyone else who used those files know to start saving them to the new files starting today.

Thanks

Kam


Hi Kate,
Deals #478168, 478944, 478945, 478946 are to be confirmed by either Greg
Wolfe or Christian Yoder.  We need to get the final copy of these confirm
letters so we can scan them into the system for our files.  Also, if the
finalized confirm has been sent to the counterparty we need to change the
status in the system.  These deals are still showing up on our "New" report
every morning and I need to do something with them.
Thanks for your help!
Kim


-----Original Message-----
From:  Conwell, Wendy
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 5:33 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael; Bradford, William S.
Subject: California Exposure - SCE/PGE

Per your request, please find the attached California Exposure File as of COB
04/18/01.  Please call with questions or comments.

WEndy


In today's edition of the Daily Update, frequent contributor Rick
Wayman, CFA, discusses the impact on the stock market of new FAS
rules and political infighting.

======================== Sponsored by =========================

123% Average Returns - Even as the Dow and Nasdaq Have Slumped
Take advantage of the most powerful moneymakers on Earth and
your portfolio could double faster than you dreamed possible -
even in this market! Get all the details in this FREE report

http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/OHL/2002
==============================================================

Also, equity research columnist Dave Sterman discusses the political
climate where RBOCs are concerned, and the ultimate impact on those
stocks.

Today's selection of broker and independent research reports include
wireless telecom, semiconductors, and specialty retailing. In addition,
members can download a free Morgan Stanley report on Intimate Brands
(IBI), by registering for the firm's free research trial.

You can link directly to our research page, which features synopses
of broker and free reports, by clicking here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=5798&nd=0110

***************************************************************
You are receiving this mail because you have registered for
Multex Investor. To unsubscribe, see bottom of this message.
***************************************************************

Below
--------

- Investment ideas
- Broker and third-party research
- Online advice and chats
- Free and sponsored reports

Investment ideas
-----------------------------------------

1. INVESTMENT IDEAS
FASten your seatbelts
New accounting rules and political infighting will make for a bumpy ride
ahead

by Rick Wayman, CFA

This is going to be an interesting quarter, if not year! The stock market is
advancing like it expects a recovery in the first half of 2002, and
politicians have reverted to their pre-9/11 partisanship. Coupled with the
new accounting rules for goodwill amortization (FAS 142), this could
make for a volatile stock market in the first quarter.

The market appears ahead of itself, and there is more downside risk than
upside potential. Stocks have rallied significantly from the 9/11 lows, but
we are really only back to where we were pre-9/11. The easy money has
been made, and now economic reality poses a threat. We think the
positive economic data that was released last month will be replaced with
negative trends in the first part of 2002. This is because the discounting
that boosted sales in December stole activity from the first part of 2002.
Consequently, we expect 4Q01 profit margins (to be reported in the first
quarter of 2002) to shrink, and early 2002 sales data to show a decline.

Click here to read more.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=5796&nd=0110

======================== Sponsored by =========================

Tech Buyback Portfolio Posts Stellar Gains: +39.23% YTD!
David Fried knows a stock is undervalued when the company
buys back its shares. That's how he earned 39.23% YTD in
techs while the benchmark Nasdaq fell 21.82%. 'Buy these 5
techs today,' Fried says. Get them with a FREE trial:

http://www.investools.com/c/go/BACK/MTEX-backTX3
==============================================================

2. INVESTMENT IDEAS
Regulatory roadblocks loom for RBOCs
Hating Ma Bell has never gone out of style

By Dave Sterman, equity research columnist

The slowing economy has been a boon for at least one segment of the
telecom world. The Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) saw
many smaller competitors go bankrupt in 2001, and their purchasing
costs fell as telecom equipment vendors were forced to lower prices to
win business. That left management of these firms sitting in the catbird
seat as we head into 2002.

But hold the phone. Washington appears set to deliver a series of
regulatory setbacks to RBOCS such as SBC Communications (SBC),
BellSouth (BLS), Qwest Communications (Q) and Verizon (VZ).

Click here to read more.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=5791&nd=0110

Broker and third-party reports
-----------------------------------------

1. INVESTORS' CHOICE: 3-DAY FAVORITE
The 451 discusses Cisco's (CSCO) new focus on the mobile wireless
market.

This report examines IP infrastructure spending, the next-gen
Internet and network architecture layers, Cisco's strategic
alliances and mobile business customer targets, and advanced e-
services and content applications. (2-page report for purchase -
$5)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=5676705&nd=0110

2. TODAY'S SPECIAL REPORT
Robert Baird & Co. reviews 2001 and previews 2002 for major
wireless service companies.

The firm identifies the winners and losers from 2001 and
recommends large- and small-cap players for investment in 2002. It
looks at some of the major industry developments from last year and
discusses 2002 industry catalysts. (7-page report for purchase - $25)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25912036&nd=0110

3. EDITOR'S PICK: CURRENT RESEARCH FROM THE CUTTING EDGE
Sun Trust Robinson Humphrey publishes a collaborative equity focus
report.

The report includes quantitative analysis and features on
electronic transaction processing, radio/TV broadcast, and individual
reports on HealthTronics (HTRN), SonicWALL (SNWL), Republic
Bancshares (REPB), and more. (40-page report for purchase - $75)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25893163&nd=0110

4. THIRD-PARTY REVIEW
Kintisheff Research reviews activity in the optical and wireless
infrastructure equipment markets.

In the report, Kintisheff offers broad sector discussion and breaks down
Q4 sales by global region, by equipment type, percentage of sales by
individual vendors in transport, switching, routing, and wireless
infrastructure. (11-page report for purchase - $25)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25918244&nd=0110

5. WHAT'S HOT?
RBC Capital Markets discusses beginning of 2002 softline retail
strategy.

RBC takes a look at recent performance amongst the group and the
forward-looking earnings outlook. The firm identifies 3 stocks it finds
attractive on a valuation basis, one of which is Abercrombie and Fitch
(ANF). (2-page report for purchase - $10)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25935069&nd=0110

======================== Sponsored by =========================

The Internet Analyst: Wall Street's daily and weekly industry outlook

Multex's The Internet Analyst features daily 'Net-industry specific
research highlights, investment ideas, analyst opinions, portfolio
strategies: http://www.multexinvestor.com/Analysts/HomeTIA.asp

To be sure you receive your TIA newsletter every week, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/login.asp
==============================================================

Online advice and chats
-----------------------------------------

1. ASK THE ANALYST
Market Edge's Tom Ventresca explains why bad news can sometimes be
good news for the market.

Ventresca explains that investor sentiment tends to be an inverse
indicator for stocks. He identifies some of his favorite market indicators
and discusses his firm's sentiment index. Pose him your questions until
Fri., Jan. 11. Ask the analyst.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AskTheAnalystForm.asp?&nd=0110

Register to receive a FREE weekly market commentary and FREE trial!
Get unbiased, computer generated BUY-HOLD-SELL opinions on 4,700
stocks and more. No credit card needed.  Click Here
http://www.marketedge.com/multex.asp?Location=3

2. ASK THE EXPERT
Insurance.com's Ronald E. Newton discusses life insurance coverage
issues brought up by divorce.

Newton explains the importance of reviewing insurance coverage in the
midst of divorce to protect loved ones should catastrophic events occur.
Do you have all the coverage you need? He can take your questions
through tonight Thurs., Jan. 10, 5 PM ET. Ask the expert.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AskTheExpertForm.asp?&nd=0110

Free and sponsored reports
-----------------------------------------

1. FREE RESEARCH REPORT
CIBC World Markets provides its outlook and current position on the
semiconductor industry.

CIBC focuses on recent sales trends and its expected industry
revenue growth through 2004. It offers a sector investment opinion and
identifies its favorite names. This 18-page report, which usually sells for
$50, is free to members for the next 72 hours.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25914538&nd=0110

2. DAILY FREE SPONSOR REPORT
Morgan Stanley reviews strategies and valuation for "neutral"-rated
Intimate Brands (IBI).

The firm declines to set a target price for IBI, and notes that increased
focus on brand development, and tighter cost and inventory control may
not be enough to offset weak comps in a difficult environment. Members
can read the firm's description of investment positives and key risks by
registering for the firm's free-research trial.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=4335290&sid=8&nd=0110

===================================================================
Please send your questions and comments to:
mailto:investor.help@multex.com

If you'd like to learn more about Multex Investor, please visit:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/welcome.asp

If you can't remember your password and/or your user name, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/lostinfo.asp

If you want to update your email address, please click on the url below:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp
===================================================================

To remove yourself from the mailing list for the Daily Update, please
REPLY to THIS email message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line. To remove yourself from all Multex Investor mailings, including
the Daily Update and The Internet Analyst, please respond with the
words NO EMAIL in the subject line.

You may also unsubscribe on the account update page at:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp

===================================================================
Please email advertising inquiries to us at:
mailto:advertise@multex.com.

Be sure to check out our other newsletters, The Internet Analyst
and The Telecomm Analyst by Multex.com. The newsletters will
inform, educate, and entertain you with usable investment data,
ideas, experts, and info about the Internet and telecommunications
sectors. To see this week's issue,
click here:
http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/ or
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000 12:32
PM ---------------------------
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Election concession & retraction parody. Has good audio also.

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000
12:01 PM ---------------------------
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Fwd: Election concession & retraction parody. Has good audio also.

---------------------- Forwarded by Ross Prevatt/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 01:08
PM ---------------------------

Charles H Otto
11/13/2000 01:03 PM
To: Ross Prevatt/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Election concession & retraction parody. Has good audio also.

---------------------- Forwarded by Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
02:01 PM ---------------------------

Chris Gaskill@ENRON
11/13/2000 12:35 PM
To: Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Piazze/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Election concession & retraction parody. Has good audio also.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000
12:35 PM ---------------------------

Marc Bir <marc@delphihome.com> on 11/13/2000 12:29:45 PM
To: Chris.Gaskill@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Fwd: Election concession & retraction parody. Has good audio also.

><http://www.mediatrip.com/shows/phone_flash.html
>http://www.mediatrip.com/shows/phone_flash.html


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 06/30/2000
10:02 AM ---------------------------

Royal_B_Edmondson@reliantenergy.com on 06/30/2000 09:52:41 AM
To: ami_Chokshi@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Intra day Midcon

(See attached file: HPL-June.xls)
 - HPL-June.xls


Robert,

Ken developed an industrial report before he left.  It can be found at
o/logistics/kenseaman/industrialsmonthly/...  There is one file for each
month of 2000.  I need you to update this for March.  This will need to be
distributed to Gas Control, Logistics, and myself.  Let me know if you have
any questions.

D