-----Original Message-----
From: 	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 11:57 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David; SMITH, Douglas; Lavorato, John; Black, Don; Forster, David; Duran, W. David; Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.; Foster, Chris H.; Black, Tamara Jae; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Furrow, Dale; Meyn, Jim; Harvey, Claudette; Presto, Kevin M.; Jacoby, Ben
Subject:	FW: Summary RTO Week Day 2 -- Planning & Expansion

FYI.

TJ and Claudette -- please forward to your groups.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walton, Steve
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:17 PM

  RTO Week
Day 2 -- October 16, 2001
Transmission Planning & Expansion
The afternoon panel discussed transmission planning and expansion. The panelists were: Jose Degado--CEO American Transmission Company, Michael Dworkin--Chair Vermont PSC, Mark Maher--VP Transmission Business Line, Bonneville Power Administration, Lara Manz--PSE&G, Masheed Rosenqvist--National Grid, Steve Walton--Enron.
General Observations
The Commissioners were all present although the did leave and return from time to time.  Commissioner's Breathitt and Massey were the most active in questioning.  The FERC Staff were active in asking questions after the initial presentations, moving along the discussion by asking questions.  There was some reference to the morning discussion of congestion management, however, there was no discussion of the merits of the various types of transmission rights.  There was a good deal of consensus around the concept of the RTO Planning Process being first a provider of information to the market (where are problems, how might they be solved, etc.) and that the where possible that expansion be funded by market participants who would benefit.  There was a good deal of discussion of "least cost planning" and the identification of options which are not transmission related.  All agreed there had to be backstop authority to build transmission, however then the challenge is who pays for it, which raises the need for dispute resolution.
Opening Statements
Jose Delgado: ATC is a transmission only company with MISO as the system operator.  They view everyone as a customer whose needs are to be met.  They were formed by divestiture by IOUS, coops and munis and with a $500 million asset base initially. Their current ten year plan will add $1billion of investment.   Their top priorities are connecting generation and load.
Michael Dworkin: Because transmission is a common good, construction affects all parties not just one party.  The environmental and permitting of lines requires a balance of benefits with costs and a long range view.  The idea of joint boards should be considered for dealing with multi-state projects, although FERC has show little interest in joint boards they have been used by FCC.  State input needed because of the local needs and impacts which must be considered.
Mark Maher: FERC must consider the unique characteristics of the West when considering congestion management.  LMP is not a good fit to hydro systems with their multiple use obligations.  RTO West is developing a planning process which will give the RTO the freedom to develop options as we learn in the future.  The RTO needs a strong centralized planning process.
Laura Manz: The various aspects of planning are connected.  Pricing (LMP) is the key to getting the right signals for expansion of transmission and resources.   No competitor should have an advantage over another.  The RTO needs a central planning process but it shouldn't push solutions.  The market should decide on solutions.
Masheed Rosenqvist: The morning discussion of congestion management talked about hedging against risk.  The planning discussion is not about what we have now, but about how to avoid future congestion.  The Commission has taken conflicting positions in different cases.  The issues that need to be answered are:  How can merchant transmission be compensated?  Should transmission projects be open to RFPs?  Is FERC open to market based pricing for expansions?
Steve Walton:  The most important thing for FERC to do for expansion is to settle the matter of industry structure do away with the uncertainty that has frozen transmission investment.  The RTO debate has been going on for 5 years or more and needs to be settled.  For expansion to go forward, there needs to be a clear property right which accrues to the expanding party.  You are always going to have muddy issues in planning.  For instance if a 138 kV line is all that is needed to day, but future considerations of scare right-of-way say a 345 kV line should be built, who pays for the extra cost.  In order to resolve such matters the planning process must include a dispute resolution process, appeal able to FERC, to decide such matters.
Discussion
Kevin Kelly asked about he fact that some parties benefit form current congestion so how does a stakeholder process get things built when some oppose.  Most agreed that if a party wants to fund construction it should be built with the beneficiaries funding.  Michael Dworkin expressed concerns about use of eminent domain to build which means a benefit test must exist to say this is the best solution, i.e. least cost planning.  This lead to discussion of the need for the RTO to be provider of information to all parties so they can make intelligent decisions.
Commissioner Massey asked about whether the system was (a) under built and needed lots of expansion so don't worry about overbuilding or (b) transmission planning should consider all options before construction of new facilities.  The panel agreed that pricing needs to be a prime determinant in the process.  Michaela Dworkin worried that overbuilding distorts decisions.  Laura Manz felt that the term "under built" is a secondary effect of not having proper pricing of locational prices to guide parties.
Dick O'Neil asked if LMP will work in the West.  Mark Maher said it wouldn't.  Laura Manz said it applies everywhere because of physics, they manage hydro facilities in PJM.  Michael Dworkin said LMP means an explicit measure of cost of congestion and the value of generation at locations and ought not to be rejected just intelligently designed.  BPA is looking pricing model but LMP won't work.  Steve Walton said LMP needed for real time dispatch, but given the nature of the Northwest hydro system it must have some "tweaks" like bilaterals and allow operator self-schedule output levels to permit  river coordination.  Hydro system optimizes over weeks and months to maximize firm energy production not on an hour to hour basis.  PJM has hydro, but not 70% as in the Northwest.  Implementation will be different because such thing as unit commitment are different when you have primarily hydro and base load coal.
In the summation at the end of the panel, four principles were listed:  (1) RTO must provide information, (2) RTO should identify solutions, (3) RTO should be unbiased and (4) the RTO should be accountable.  The disagreement was over the last two points, Michael Dworkin felt that #3 (unbiased) was critical and that #4 (accountability) was accomplished by having regulators involved in governance.  Jose Delgado said and Transco can't be unbiased since it provides services, although the ISO above it can be, but accountability is based on loosing your investment if you make an mistake.  This last point really comes down to a preference for ISO over Transco forms and the tension which exist because unbiased and accountability issues.
Steve


---------------------- Forwarded by V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2001 05:58 PM ---------------------------
From:	Jay Reitmeyer/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/17/2001 01:05 PM
To:	V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/onlineprod/drought/xmgr.html


Sami, by copy hereof, I have asked Jeff Hodge to look into this matter.  He is at 36911.   Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arap, Sami
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 6:06 AM
To:	Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Cc:	Kishkill, Joe; Collonges, Remi
Subject:	Master Trading Agreements - Brazil
Importance:	High

Hi  Mark;

We just started discussions with Duke and El Paso regarding the execution of a Master Trading Agreement for Brazilian spot market deals (physical power deals).  I have already been informed by Duke's local counsel that Enron and Duke have executed some sort of a worldwide master trading agreement which may or may not cover Brazil.  Haven't heard from El Paso yet.  Who, in North America, could provide me with information on these Duke and El Paso agreements ?

Hope all is well.

Tks & Rgds,

Sami


Chris,  Amy is going to send out the new policy this morning and if you could forward this to the floor, that'd be great.  Thanks,  KN
Please join us at the Horse Brass Pub on Thursday, April 5th, for 				Brett's Farewell!

We will be kicking off the festivities at 6:00pm and hope you all can come to wish Holly and Brett good luck on their new adventure!  Attached are directions--the address is 4534 SE Belmont Street.


Elliot,

Attached based on our discussions.

Richard


Global Contracts and Global Facilities personnel will be attending an
off-site conference on June 15th and 16th. If you need something while we are
away, please do not hesitate to use the Team pagers listed below or call me
at  (713) 822-7153. We will have a laptop available to setup contracts if
needed.  If you page us we will return your page as quickly as possible.
Thanks


Yea.  I will be there.  What time again?

"Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 03/22/2000 01:46:29 PM
To: eric preston bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: golf

Hi son. Are you in for golf this Sat.? Let me  know.-Dad


Dear Vincent,  Henwood Energy Services Senior Project Manager George Given talks about the Texas power market from the Houston bureau on Monday. Henwood Energy Services is forecasting the ERCOT power market is overbuilt.  The Houston bureau will bring us details next week.   We'll also hear from Niagara Mohawk Energy President and CEO Philip VanHorne next week as he talks about the negative effects of Enron on the national power industry.  Catch VanHorne's comments on Monday from Houston.   Amalgamated Bank of New York is trying to freeze the assets of some Arthur Andersen executives.  We'll have coverage of the federal court hearing on Tuesday taking place in Houston.   The two major stories in Washington next week are the return of Congress and the ongoing investigations into Enron.  Lawmakers return on Wednesday and will immediately begin new hearings on the embattled energy company.  The first hearing is scheduled for Thursday in Senator Joe Lieberman's Governmental Affairs Committee.  The Washington bureau will be covering the hearing next week and examining the impact the Enron situation could have on the overall energy debate in Congress.   Washington Bureau Chief Peter Cook will sit down next week for an exclusive interview with Interior Secretary Gale Norton.  Peter says he'll ask her about a host of issues including the future of energy production on federal lands and her view on the pending debate in Congress over drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.   ENL's Kym McNicholas talks with California Assemblyman Joe Nation on Monday.  He'll discuss a new bill offering more incentives for renewables.      Harvard Economist William Hogan will also join Kym next week to discuss the California ISO's new Market Design Project 2002. Hogan says the plan is a major step forward in the California electricity market.  Catch him during the 2:00 p.m. ET newscast on Tuesday.    Closing Prices for Friday, Jan. 18, 2002    Crude: $18.00/bbl +$0.03   Unleaded: $0.5392/gallon +$0.0031   Heating Oil: $0.5141/gallon -$0.0004   Gas: $2.236/mmBtu -$0.018   Fwd uE(Feb.): $3.60/mmBtu -$0.05   Scheduling Note: I want to let everyone know that though the markets are closed, we'll be live from 9:00 a.m. ET to 5:00 p.m. ET Monday.   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests have to reschedule or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap Video Windows Media Player: 56K  | 100K  | 300K  Real Player: 56K  | 100K  | 300K  (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue, subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now    If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


David and Louise:
I am working with Bob on a confidentiality agreement with Organic Inc. which
contains a mutual "no solicitation" provisions that would prevent either
party from hiring or soliciting for employment any employee or independent
contractor of the other for a period that would expire 6 months after the
termination of any business relationship of the parties.   How do you feel
about this?
Carol


We only send this to the legal team that follows, not the distribution that
Brad sends it to.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/16/2000 04:49 PM -----

	Tana Jones
	11/16/2000 04:15 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Marie Heard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane
McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 11/16/00

RUSH BELOW.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/16/2000 04:15 PM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	11/16/2000 03:59 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 11/16/00

Please amend the Oneok file asap.

Regards,
bd


Ken, at your request, my staff and I met with Robert Hatchett and his team.
They offered Enron an opportunity to invest in a patented method of
generating electricity by converting methane to hydrogen and burning hydrogen
in a high efficiency turbine.  This patent represents an idea, without any
exhaustive quantitative analysis or research and without any prototype
demonstrated in the field or a lab.

We politely told Mr. Hatchett that we would review his proposal and get back
to him.

Subsequently, we conveyed to Mr. Hatchett that a) methane consumption rate
for an integrated facility based on the subject patent is higher than the
conventional plant efficiency b) the result in fuel cost is higher c) the
overall Co2 emissions are probably higher d) there is no economical or
technical justification to support an investment of Enron funds.

We informed Bob Hatchett that we would recommend to Enron that Enron not
invest in the development of this effort.  While we invited Mr. Hatchett to
respond back to us regarding our analysis, I see no further action required
by us at this time.

Please let me know if you want us to draft anything from you to Mr. Hatchett
regarding this subject.

LI39200


To get immediate response on an EOL issue, such as a next day deal that is
not showing up in Sitara, either call me at 3-5824
or Torrey Moorer at 3-6218. If you are unable to reach either one of us,
please page us at the following numbers. Please pass
this information to others in your group.
Thank you.

Jennifer de Boisblanc Denny  1-877-473-1343
Torrey Moorer     1-877-473-1344


It looks like Anne accidentally include two Sumas trades in the Rockies data
priced at 13.90 and 14.00.  She will send out a revised spreadsheet on
Thursday.  The Rockies Opal wacog will then be $5.913.  Sorry for the error.

Sincerely,
Mike Grigsby
Director, West Trading


STEVE KEAN

Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date:  Tuesday, February 20th
Time:  11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video:  Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call: AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera
(713/853-5984)
  or Bill Dorsey (713/646-6505) for the weekly dial-in number and passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.

 Yes, I will attend in person ___X____

 By video conference from _______

 By conference call  _______

 No, I will not attend  _______

*  *  *

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday,
February 16th.
Thank you,
Bill Dorsey.


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000
10:20 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Per Sekse                           11/15/2000 10:17 AM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: BRENT/WTI spread

FYI. Just thought I'd let you know we're pushing the crude ideas and getting
positive feed back. Should lead to business shortly.  Per

---------------------- Forwarded by Per Sekse/NY/ECT on 11/15/2000 10:56 AM
---------------------------

Caroline Abramo@ENRON
11/15/2000 10:07 AM
To: Chris Glaas/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Per Sekse/NY/ECT)
Subject: RE: BRENT/WTI spread

Hi Chris- thanks for getting on the horn with Harvard last week- because we
know they are already long the spreads, we will have to work on them amending
the position or putting more on longer term.

Below is feedback from another fund- Tudor, who we trade a lot with- same
thing- we will have to work on other ideas.  I am getting a bit more
comfortable with the flow of crude and appreciate your help on ideas.

These guys generally look at us as nat gas/ power only but are very willing
to trade crude/ products- just need to build credibility.

Talk to you later,
CA
---------------------- Forwarded by Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron on 11/15/2000
09:47 AM ---------------------------

Dwight Anderson <Dwight.Anderson@tudor.com> on 11/15/2000 08:05:02 AM
To: "'Caroline.Abramo@enron.com'" <Caroline.Abramo@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: BRENT/WTI spread

Is a great idea.  (cuz we put it on in the low 1.20s....)  thx for the idea.
almost too bad we have it on already.....

-----Original Message-----
From: Caroline.Abramo@enron.com [mailto:Caroline.Abramo@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 5:00 PM
To: Dwight.Anderson@tudor.com; Jason.Mraz@tudor.com
Cc: Per.Sekse@enron.com
Subject: BRENT/WTI spread

Dwight/Jason-

We have done some analysis on the Brent / WTI spread- we would recommend
buying WTI/ selling Brent for 2Q01 (as well as 02 and 03).

We looked back to 1995 to see how each 2Q of these years traded 1 year
prior to it being prompt.  The graph attached gives the raw data and the
word doc some risk/ reward analysis (1995 was a weird year).

(See attached file: Brent_TI Analysis.xls)(See attached file:
Brent_WTI-Trade.doc)

The spread is pretty constant at 1.25- 1.40 up until the contracts are
prompt- then the average is more like 1.80.  2000 was particularly striking
because of the gasoline shortage in the Mid West which put pressure on WTI
at Cushing (and in general kept cracks high)- we got out to 2.70.  We are
looking for a repeat this year.  The Arb has generally moved to 2.70
minimum (to bring Brent to Cushing) because of higher freight rates this
year- this looks to continue.

The spread has moved out the last few days as Dec Brent is getting tight
(due to UK tax affect)- now 1.52 at 1.57

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts on this.
Rgds,
CA


Attached is a quick blurb on the major protests filed in the PGE/Sierra
merger.  There's good news and bad news.  The good news is that there were
only a couple of significant protests filed.  The bad new is that the
protests are quite significant.  In addition to the two protests Adam
addresses, there was a protest filed by the Nevada Public Service Commission,
and an additional protest filed by Truckee Donner.  The Nevada Attorney
General's Bureau of Consumer Protection also filed a brief protest.

We are getting a copy of the rest of the protests now and will have a more
detailed summary of all of the protests early next week.

Adam has been in touch with the Scadden attorneys and Peter Fox-Penner, the
economic consultant who performed the Appendix A market power analysis.  We
will be working closely with them to develop an answer to the protests.
Answers are due on May 18.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Sarah

"Wenner, Adam" <awenner@velaw.com> on 05/05/2000 12:16:44 PM
To: "'Novosel, Sarah'" <snovose@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Memorandum re: Interventions in PGE/Sierra Pacific Resources Mer ger
Application

 <<85876_1.DOC>> Attached is a summary of the substantive interventions and
of responses to the arguments.  Regarding the Truckee-Donner intervention,
Matt
Estes (Scadden) points out that the FERC will either require or not require
the hold
harmless extension, but won't go to hearing or otherwise delay the
proceeding to deal with it.

 - 85876_1.DOC


Matt here are the historicals, all those averges pull from the table on the attachment.


Chris:

As we discussed yesterday, Laird and I spoke and we think that the
presentation is good to go for Thursday.  We'll need to update the numbers
for the offer we made to S.D. last week.  You had mentioned that you might
want to include a shaped product.  You still considering it?  Let us know and
we can add it, and make any other changes you'd like to make at this end.

My flight gets into S.D. at at 8:35 on southwest.

Best,
Jeff


Harvest Happy Hour
Analyst & Associate Monthly Networking

Friday, November 9th
Contemporary Arts Museum
6:00pm - 8:30pm

5216 Montrose Boulevard
713/284-8250

Sponsored by Enron Industrial Markets
Benefiting The Houston Food Bank

Please bring canned goods or non-perishable food items

Harvest Food Drive:  November 12-16
Donations accepted @ Analyst & Associate Program
35th Floor

RSVP
donna.jones@enron.com

Hosted by the Analyst & Associate Program


debra,

Please see the attached 1st draft of pricing language for the Unimark deal # 1062624.  I am not sure about the NX 1 language, (you may want to ask Gerald?).

I have a total of 4 deals with Unimark which will use  similar language (with the  5 pricing tiers), so once you approve of this one, I can use it as a templete for the other deals.

thanks so much.  lisa

Lisa K. Hesse
Physical Gas Confirmations
 (713) 345-4766  EB 2116B


Jeff:  I spoke with Natalie and she is looking forward to hearing from you.  I told her that you have been swamped and would call her soon.  I will bet my bonus you will be happy you called.  Take care and lets try and play some golf soon.

Marc Graubart
Director
Enron Global Markets LLC
Weather Risk Management
(713) 853-3019
(713) 201-5200

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 5:37 PM
To:	Graubart, Marc
Subject:	RE: Another possible date

thanks. you're the king.  I've been busy with board meetings, and next year's budget  (working until late, then usually a business dinner), but if you talk to natalie, I should be able to call her by this weekend.  Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Graubart, Marc
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 4:08 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	Another possible date

Jeff:  This is the girl I originally mentioned to you on Monday.  Her name is Wendy Forman and she is a nice Jewish girl from Atlanta originally, and now lives in NYC and Palm Beach.  She is like 31 years old and a great gal.  I attach a photo that was taken of us in NYC at Adam Dell's apartment.  Let me know what you think?  Her numbers are:
Cell: 917 363-4321
Home: 212 794-3252

 << File: Wendy Forman.jpg >>

Marc Graubart
Director
Enron Global Markets LLC
Weather Risk Management
(713) 853-3019
(713) 201-5200


Still separate and still be invested.

Cathy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Musch, Susan
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:05 PM
To:	Moehlman, Cathy; Whiting, Greg
Cc:	Laborde, John; Zisman, Stuart; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: Wire Info
Importance:	High

Cathy and Greg,

Would you confirm whether the $250 MM was swept back by Enron Corp.?

Best regards,
Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Laborde, John
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:10 AM
To:	Zisman, Stuart; Musch, Susan; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: Wire Info

I'm not so sure of that because we couldn't see all of the wire transfers.  There was a credit to the new entity's account in the amount of $250 million on November 5th and then there was a debit of $249,900,000 on the 6th.  It looks like that money went into a Goldman Sachs account.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zisman, Stuart
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:06 AM
To:	Musch, Susan; Laborde, John; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: Wire Info

I assume this means that the payment was made and not swept back by Enron Corp.?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Musch, Susan
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:11 AM
To:	Laborde, John; Zisman, Stuart; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	FW: Wire Info

FYI.

Best regards,
Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moehlman, Cathy
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:22 AM
To:	Musch, Susan
Subject:	Wire Info

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
[Musch, Susan]
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moehlman, Cathy
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:22 AM
To:	Musch, Susan
Subject:	Wire Info

 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>


Deal number on the buy from PNM is #581199.

The shape of this length is:

HE1	50
HE2	50
HE3	50
HE4	50
HE5	45
HE6	20
HE23	35
HE24	50

Day total is 350.

Thanks


This is strange.  Sometimes when I open a file in the database it does not
show, nor allow me to do legal comments.  Is there some trick or security
clearance I do not have?  Mary


it was awesome.  i didn't get your message until last night.  i didn't have
my phone with me there.  it was so much fun.  that was one of the greatest
games that i went to.  where did you watch it?  it sounded like you were
partying some.


_________________________________________________________________

            B R E A K F A S T   W I T H   T H E   F O O L
                     Tuesday, November 21, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205552
_________________________________________________________________

 Sponsored By: Ameritrade
 You're headed to Wall Street in style. Get 2 round-trip
 tickets to Hawaii, Mexico or London when you open a cash
 account with just $500. Click here for Ameritrade.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=205553

"It is human nature to think wisely and to act in an absurd
fashion." -- Anatole France

AGILENT EARNS ITS "A"
Agilent tops estimates and moves to the head of the class.

By Rick Aristotle Munarriz

If there were truth in ticker symbols, Agilent (NYSE: A) would
be holding up its "A" report card proudly. With quarterly
estimates pegged at $0.53 a share, the electronics testing
equipment maker powered up expectations with a $0.69-a-share showing.

That was a 77% surge in bottom-line growth before charges on
$3.4 billion in revenues for the September period. That's
welcome news for a company that has seen its shares fall sharply
since peaking at $162 back in March.

However, a slowdown in microchip testing equipment as well as
weakness in the wireless market has the company warning of
slower growth ahead. With a healthy backlog of orders, Agilent
still expects to meet estimates of $0.45 for the current
quarter.

Spun off by Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HWP) last year, Agilent will
be deploying new capital into areas where it sees higher growth:
communications and life sciences. I guess that gives the company
an "A" for effort too.
_________________________________________________________________

NEWS TO GO

Chipped off the old block, semiconductor distributor Avnet
(NYSE: AVT) announced that earnings for the current quarter
would come in between a nickel to a dime below the $0.85-a-share
forecast. While acknowledging the cyclical ways of the chip
industry, the company believes that earnings for the rest of the
year will remain on track.

Attention holiday shoppers, Nieman Marcus (NYSE: NMG.A) reported
stronger-than-expected profits but warned of slow action at the
registers so far this month. That's critical as the upscale
department store chain heads into the important buying season.
Nobody wants to see the Grinch steal Christmas (well, OK, it did
top the box office this past weekend, but that's another story).

EDGAR Hoovered? The Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC)
site for electronic financial filing and data retrieval will go
down on Friday for a "major upgrade." The Electronic Data
Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system -- thankfully better
known as EDGAR -- will be back up on Monday morning.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=205554

Has Ozzy Osbourne bitten off more than he can chew -- again? The
legendary showman is suing Hughes Electronics (NYSE: GMH) and
MCY.com (Nasdaq: MCYC) for broadcasting an Ozzfest 2000 concert
tour stop to Hughes' DirecTV subscribers. Osbourne claims that
tour sponsor MCY.com only had rights to a Web cast of the rock
event. Mr. Crowley will not be his legal counsel.

Deere (NYSE: DE) John? An epic Novell (Nasdaq: NOVL)? Hit the
Fluor (NYSE: FLR)? These questions and more will be answered as
the companies get set to release earnings today.

Check out yesterday's Foolish market wrap-up with just one click.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205555
_________________________________________________________________

EDITORS' PICK

Matt Richey explains the Fool's new, free My Accounts service
that drastically simplifies how you manage all of your online
accounts.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205556
_______________________________________________________________

-News & Commentary
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205557

-Fool Community
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205558

-Post of the Day
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205559

-Latest Fribble
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205560

-Latest Market Numbers
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205561
____________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205562
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205563
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205564
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205565
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205566

 Sponsored By: Ameritrade
 You're headed to Wall Street in style. Get 2 round-trip
 tickets to Hawaii, Mexico or London when you open a cash
 account with just $500. Click here for Ameritrade.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=205567

17 INDUSTRIES WORTH A LOOK
 See which industries our writers think
 will be hot next year with Industry Focus 2001.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=205568

ARE YOU ENROLLED IN WIRELESS 201?
 Don't miss the sequel to the best-selling
 report on Soapbox.com
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=205569

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com>

Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205570
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

.

MsgId:
msg-7420-2000-11-21_9-09-44-3298457_2_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-09:14:31(11-21-
2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


Sally,

It was nice meeting with you this morning.  Here are my mid-year and year-end
lists of accomplishments for your records. You may already have my mid-year
document from the June PRC process, and the year-end document is the same
document I left with you today.  Robb Justice has both documents as well.
Robb is also somewhat familiar with my Asia-Pacific work as he assisted our
Japan, Singapore, and S. Korea efforts several times throughout the year.  I
let him know today that you would be contacting him.

Thanks you,
Nicole


Shack,

try Hutch @:     HUTCHATHOH@AOL.COM

...and JD @ JOWEN9653@AOL.COM

BEEK

To  unsubscribe from this group, send an email  to:
smu-betas-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of  Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service .

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
smu-betas-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service .

 - 300x250.gif
 - rand=931043894


Hi Vince,

Last evening I received the Employment Authorization Card from INS, valid for
one year.  It seems Milenia Soto has submitted all the applications but for
some reason she did not receive the receipts.

I really appreciate your help and support.

With regards,

Amitava


I am having email problems.  I will try this again.
----- Forwarded by Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron on 12/13/2000 03:28 PM -----

	Leslie Lawner
	12/13/2000 03:21 PM

		 To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Paper on gas diversion, curtailment, etc.

Here is the paper in its latest form.  We are still waiting for the rest of
the interstate pipeline tariffs to be summarized and I will have to add
Keyspan and Peoples when I get the tariffs.  Paul, you may want to have Mike
Smith do more of a discussion of the issues, as the bullets are not always
that informative, but see what you think.  Thanks.  And Becky, when I print
out the document, the pipeline matrix gets lopped off.  How do I fix that?


All,
>
> I was told a story recently about a person who had his briefcase stolen
> while on a business trip.  He lost everything.  Inside the briefcase was
> his passport, wallet, house keys, car keys and cash.  I guess no one told
> him NOT to keep everything in one place!  He immediately went back to his
> hotel room and dialed the numbers listed below. The only thing the thieves
> got was a free tank of gas.  They literally filled their tank within 2
> blocks of the hotel.  But that is all they got.  After calling the numbers
> below, the next call was to the local police department.  A call was then
> made to  his hometown Department of Motor Vehicles and Social Security
> office.  He  then called his wife requesting she get all the locks changed
> on the house and cars immediately.  This is excellent advice.  Another
> good piece of advise is to place the contents of your wallet on a
> photocopy machine, do both sides of each license, credit card, etc.  You
> will know what you had in your wallet along with the account numbers and
> the phone numbers to call in case you need to cancel.  Keep the copy in a
> safe place.
>
> We have all heard horror stories about fraud that is committed using
> someone else's name, address, social security number, credit, etc.  Here
> is some critical information to limit the damage in case this happens to
> you.  As everyone always advises, cancel your credit cards immediately,
> but the key is having the toll free phone numbers and your credit card
> numbers handy so you will know whom to call.  Keep these where you can
> find them easily.  File a police report immediately in the jurisdiction
> where the theft occurred.  This proves to credit providers you were
> diligent.  It is also the first step toward an investigation.  But here's
> what is perhaps most important (I never thought of doing this) - Call the
> three national credit reporting organizations immediately to place a FRAUD
> ALERT on your name and social security number.  The alert means any
> company that checks your credit knows your information was stolen. They
> have to contact you by phone, at a number you provide, to authorize any
> new credit
>
> The numbers are:  Equifax : 1-800-525-6285, Experian (formerly TRW) :
> 1-888-397-3742, Trans Union : 1-800-680-7289
>
> Also make a call to:  Social Security Administration (fraud line):
> 1-800-269-0271.
>
> I hope you never need this information.  If you do, I hope you find it
> helpful.  Feel free to share this e-mail with others.  Together,  we can
> fight crime!

Bill Carlton
Elwood Packaging, Inc.
800.522.2050 x154


Hi Phillip,

This is an internal candidate that has posted for your Spec. Risk Management
position, Req. # 108798.  Please review and reply back to this e-mail if you
are interested in meeting with this candidate.

Chris Atherton- He is currently working for EES as a Regional Account Manager
for the Energy Information Solutions division. He has no previous risk
experience but as he is an internal candidate I wanted you to take a look at
him anyway. Has very strong Excel skills and intermediate Access. Current
base is 38K plus commission. Looking for high 40's. He is looking for a new
opportunity and really wants to make the move into Risk Management.

Thanks!
Imelda Trevino
Human Resources
ext.5-2539


ok swammies -

I told Neil I'd gather some input -  my assessment is 25% probability that
payment is not received within one year; probability is nil that it won't be
received at all.  Your thoughts?
----- Forwarded by Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron on 02/25/2001 08:52 PM -----

	Neil Bresnan@EES
	02/23/2001 05:45 PM

		 To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc: Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: California ISO Credit

Michael,

With the dissolution of the PX we are exploring various markets in an attempt
to shape our load and minimise our credit exposure to counterparts such as
the ISO.  We are continuing to work with EPMI to manage the risk associated
with selling any volume into the Cal ISO. Currently we are purchasing power
on a daily basis from the market to meet the highest common on and off peak
hour.  This strategy leaves us long for all the other hours but reduces our
exposure to ISO penalties for under scheduling . Our most promising options
are to sell the excess shoulder power into the PX imbalance market or OTC
hour ahead. We are concerned about any receivable from the ISO and would like
to know what you think the probability is of non-payment. If we do receive
payment over what time period can we expect to receive it.

NFB


Please Join Dave and I to watch the final survivor episode this Thursday!


Sounds promising - keep it moving.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000
02:26 PM ---------------------------

Don Miller
06/26/2000 08:47 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FPL Update

We spent three days meeting with the FPL guys last week.  The meetings were
productive, and we are making progress.  Lew has instructed these guys to get
down into a lot of detail on the business plan/core competencies, which we
did!

They also floated the valuation of their existing assets - $3.1B for 3947 MWs
or $789/kW.  We walked them through our peaker valuation as well.  We didn't
debate the valuations, but rather we decided to go ahead and have Clement and
Jinsung try to pull together a consolidated model for NewCo.  That is being
done, and should be ready Monday/Tuesday.

It is apparent from these meetings that they are looking for ENRON to provide
several key pieces to NewCo (other than peakers and dev. projects):

1. Enron culture and emphasis on intellectual capital (including HR approach).
2. Trading and marketing expertise.
3. Enron style finance.
4. Select management spots.
5. Supplement development team.

The interesting debate is how we get compensated for the significant impact
that the Enron "halo" is going to have on NewCo's IPO ( particularly if we
deliver the items listed above).  I raised this incremental value issue with
them.

FPL's key pieces include:

1. Core "operating" competencies and asset management techniques.
2. Construction management techniques.
3.  Select management spots.
4.  National development team.

The FPL risk in this whole exercise is if Lew is unsuccessful in convincing
Broadhead that owning some % of NewCo is not a better value proposition that
owning 100% on FPLE; and/or the decision to wait until Florida deregulates
before spinning out FPLE.  Glenn Smith stopped by last week and he
highlighted these issues as well.

We have a lot of work to do this week including a need to determine Trading &
Marketing model; develop potential services agreements (QF, back office);
refine our financial model and expand to include new projects, turbine capx,
etc.; expand development framework;  pull pitch together to float NewCo by
investment bank, etc.....

I am happy to expand on exactly where we stand with FPL.  I guess we also
need to think about staffing if both Cinergy and FPL move forward (let's just
sell the peakers to Cinergy for $1.25B and let them do their own IPO).

Regards,

Don


Here are the summaries that I have prepared for Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan,
Canada & Israel.  The fomat can be used as a template for other countries as
well, therefore if you have any preference on the format, please let me
know.  Any other imputs from you is also greatedly appreciated (especially
from tax and legal).

Xi Xi

(713) 345-8428 office


Following our recent discussions, I wanted to provide more information about
how we would plan to administer the contest around Euro 2000.  We would
restrict access to the contest to participants in countries that we have
cleared.  The likely way that this will work will be to restrict access at
the point of registration for the contest.  Here's how I think it would look
to the user:

There would be a Euro 2000 icon on the EnronOnline quotes screen (the main
page of our system).
The user would click on this icon, and a new browser window would open with
the EnronOnline/Sports.com home page.  This will contain schedules, results,
player profiles, etc.  It will also contain an icon for Minute Mania Contest.
When the user clicks on this icon, they would then go to a page that
describes at a high level what the contest is.  Pick times for events (first
goal, etc) and win prizes (digital video camera, etc).   We would also note
here that the contest is only open to residents of UK, Germany, etc.  Click
here to register.
The user will then go to a screen that has several input boxes that include:
Name, contact details (email, phone), user name for contest, and country of
residence.  The country of residence box would either be a drop down that
only includes choices for the countries that are eligible or would allow the
user to type their country.  If the user has the ability to type their
country then the system would then have a verification process that rejects
those that are ineligible to participate.

The order of priority for the countries where we have users is:

UK
Germany
Belgium
Netherlands
Switzerland
Norway
Sweden
Finland
Denmark
Austria
Italy
Spain
France

Then there is also

US (largest customer base) -  state by state differences
Canada (second largest group)
Australia
Japan

We also have users with guest ID's in Poland, Portugal, and Singapore. (we
should confirm the laws here as well)

Please let me know if I can provide any further details.

thanks
Dave


Got lunch plans?  Lets talk about this at 12:30--my joint.  (I'll buy) df

From: Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/30/2001 03:01 PM
To: Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ENRON@enronXgate, sstojic@gbmdc.com@SMTP@enronXgate
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Additional Needles capacity

As you'll see in the Legal bullets, TW Commercial has asked me to look into
the following issue.
As you probably know, SoCalGas is proposing to add compression to its system,
which will result in at least 50,000 MMcf/d additional takeaway capacity from
Needles by Dec. 2001.
TW's shippers have gotten wind of this thru the trade press and are already
calling TW to ask about the availability of additional Needles capacity.
Many of them are already shippers to Topock who would love to switch their
primary point to Needles.
The issue is this:  One of the reasons Red Rock capacity has been so slow to
sell is that we have no more Needles capacity available, and shippers are
less enthusiastic about shipping to Topock.  Our marketers would like to
earmark the new Needles delivery point capacity for use by Red Rock shippers,
rather than let existing shippers move primary points.  This will help to
sell out the expansion space.
I am looking thru my file of cases on the topic of reserving capacity for
expansions, to see if it gets us anywhere.  I'll let you know what I find.
If you have comments in the meantime, please let me know.  We may need to set
up a conference call to discuss this sometime next week.  Thanks.


Oh no, nothing urgent, I just feel like i take one step forward and two steps
backward,  you know the drill!


I wanted to let you know that the deadlines for dropping the curves and risk book calculations are no longer in effect. Thanks for your help on this, it was greatly appreciated.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:46 PM
To:	Driscoll, Michael M.; Swerzbin, Mike; Badeer, Robert; Motley, Matt; Crandall, Sean; Scholtes, Diana; Richter, Jeff; Alonso, Tom; Coffing, Timothy; Williams, Bill; Mallory, Chris; Salisbury, Holden; Alport, Kysa; Symes, Kate; Bishop, Serena; Fischer, Mark; Foster, Chris H.
Cc:	Belden, Tim; Chang, Fran; Dunton, Heather; Law, Samantha; Warner, Nicholas
Subject:	Risk book calculations

Due to current circumstances, until further notice all curves need to be marked by 12:30 pm and the Risk Management group will begin all calculations by 1:15 pm Pacific time. We will try to work with all of you the best we can, but please understand that it will be on a case by case basis. We have been asked to ensure that we meet these deadlines as often as possible. If you have any questions or concerns regarding these times please let me know.

John

John Postlethwaite
EPMI-West Power Risk Management
503-464-7756


We can do that.  Brian, would you mail Don a copy of the CGAS and CGLF
invoices for January?  We will take care of everything else.

thanks

cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/05/2000 07:57:16 AM
To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" <Scott.Goodell@enron.com>, " -
*Molly.Johnson@enron.com" <Molly.Johnson@enron.com>, " - *Perrone, Brian"
<bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Kinney, Doug"
<dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Flewellyn, Melissa"
<mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: Re: Transport Invoices

Can you send a copy to me and one to Don.

Thanks - Charlie

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 04/05/2000 08:12:11 AM
Please respond to Chris.Germany@enron.com

To: Melissa Flewellyn/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, Charles
Dalphon/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, Doug Kinney/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS,
Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc: Molly.Johnson@enron.com, Scott.Goodell@enron.com
Subject: Transport Invoices

Don Kirkendahl (in your Houston office 713-350-8445) contacted me yesterday.
He
is requesting copies of the transport invoices.  Should I give the invoices to
him or should I send them to Charlie?


We have agreed (subject to Mike's agreement) to put in the tax language in
the contract for all weather ones - as we haven't loaded them yet.
Regards
L

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT on 08/24/99 11:53
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Devetski, Tim" <tdevetski@velaw.com>
08/23/99 03:29 PM

To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "Gerachis, George" <GGerachis@velaw.com>
Subject: Revised GTCs

 - HDD Swap (credit) Version 3.doc


We can create significant mutual benefit by partnering with a firm which is
focussed on developing IT systems for bulk power systems:

 We need to take our deregulation model to the next level of detail by having
IT solutions which will support our view of how the market ought to work.
 The IT firm would benefit from our access to the policy makers (domestic and
international)  whose decisions will make the IT firm's systems either
successful or obsolete.
Call me if you would like to discuss.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 09/21/99 03:13
PM ---------------------------
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shashi
Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen R Horn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Zurita/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Ross Perot's EMS company

To all--Steve Horn's Investment group has been approached to possibly invest
in a company, Soft____, that makes EMS and tagging systems (which BPA is
using and PGE may use).  We met w/ Shashi Patel of Steve's group today and
discussed that there are competitors out there, including OATI, Alstom ESCA
(who are partnered with Ross Perot).  Ross Perot has approached Enron about
promoting its system in the Midwest ISO.   We used this system for Enron
control area's EMS.  Ross Perot is going to contact Steve Kean to set up a
meeting to show us his product.  Also, Kevin Presto thinks that OATI would be
a good investment.

Steve Kean--Steve Horn and Shashi Patel are interested in being included in a
presentation by Perot.

Sarah and Joe--Can you think of any FERC regulatory constraints that would
limit Enron's ability to invest in one of the software providers to
utilities/RTOS?  I couldn't think of any reason off hand.

Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 09/20/99
04:57 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Christi L Nicolay                           09/10/99 02:42 PM

To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Midwest ISO information (Transco?)

Steve/Joe/Sarah--See the attached memo from Alstom ESCA to Kevin Presto.
Alstom ESCA did the Enron control area's (ENSE) EMS system that we needed to
comply with NERC policies.  How should we proceed?  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 09/10/99
02:10 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin M Presto                           09/10/99 01:30 PM

To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Midwest ISO information...

What are your thoughts?  I recommend talking with Steve Kean and Joe Hartsoe
ASAP to coordinate with the ESCA/OATI/Perot System consortium regarding the
Midwest ISO.  Dick George from ESCA mentioned that Ross Perot would like to
make contact at a high level inside Enron to discuss the merits of Enron
supporting a for-profit transco structure for the Midwest ISO.  The
ESCA/OATI/Perot System consortium is offering a system to the Midwest ISO
that is designed to support  a for-profit transco.  The consortium's primary
competitor (ABB) has a system that supports the more structured ISO
environment (similar to California and PJM).

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT on 09/10/99 01:05
PM ---------------------------

"dsgeorge" <dsgeorge@earthlink.net> on 09/09/99 11:00:36 PM
To: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Lloyd Will" <LWill@hydro.mb.ca>
cc: "John Wulf" <john.wulf@alstom.esca.com>, "Brent Brobak" <Brent@esca.com>,
"Laurence Ferry" <laurence.ferry@esca.com>, "JD Hammerly"
<jd.hammerly@esca.com>
Subject: Midwest ISO information...

Kevin and Lloyd,

The Signatories of the Midwest ISO follow:
Allegheny Power
Ameren (formerly Union Electric and Central Illinois Public Service Company)
CILCO
Cinergy
Commonwealth Edison
Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative
Illinois Power
Kentucky Utilities
Louisville Gas & Electric
Northern States Power
Wabash Valley Power
Wisconsin Electric

The status of the formation is anti-profit, i.e. a holding pattern is in
place with a FERC Tariff request to carry over seven years.  The view is
that a for-profit-ISO goes completely against the grain and that only a
mandate by FERC will get them to change.  Given Entergy's fight with FERC
even a mandate will be a hard fought court exercise.

At present there are sixteen control areas therefore the system requirement
with grandfathered contracts in each is odious.

Nevertheless, the form ESCA and our partners Perot, OATI and Tenfold offer
is a full-up system ready for a for-profit implementation.  As you might
expect the division of responsibilities on the proposal is Perot as Program
Manager (their position with the California ISO again), OATI for Tagging and
Congestion Management, Tenfold for Settlement and Billing, and finally ESCA
for the EMS/Market Systems.  We prefer a for-profit model as it betters our
offering and provides more near-term opportunity.

Discussions with the Perot, OATI and Tenfold partners concurred that sharing
information with Enron and vice-versa would help all of us understand how
each side may be able to position ourselves with the Midwest ISO.  Mutual
help and cooperation is to our partners, ESCA's and it would seem Enron's
advantage.

MIDWEST ISO BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                                JAMES H. YOUNG, JR. - Chairman
                          Former Senior Vice President, Business Development
                         South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Columbia, SC
                                           Address:
                                        130 Aspen Trail
                                      Columbia, SC 29206
                                        (803) 782-2943
                                     Jim10@mindspring.com

                               PAUL E. HANAWAY - Vice Chairman
                      Former Commissioner, Rhode Island Public Utilities
Commission
                                        Providence, RI
                                           Address:
                                     231 Whites Ledge Lane
                                        Glen, NH 03838
                                         P.O. Box 601
                                        Glen, NH 03838
                                        (603) 383-9374
                                     (603) 383-6912 (FAX)
                                   phanaway@landmarknet.net

                                   WILLIAM O. ALBERTINI
                       Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
                               Bell Atlantic Corp. 698 Strafford Circle
                                      Strafford, PA 19087
                                        (610) 293-1511
                                     (610) 293-0392 (FAX)
                                     woakka@bellatlantic.net

                                   DAVID F. DEROSA, Ph.D.
                             President, DeRosa Research and Trading, Inc.
                                   495 White Oak Shade Road
                                     New Canaan, CT 06840
                                        (203) 801-4340
                                     (203) 801-4342 (FAX)
                                   derosa@derosa-research.com

                                    DONALD L. STOKLEY
                             Former President and Chief Executive Officer
                               Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia
                                           Address:
                                      870 Highgreen Court
                                      Marietta, GA 30068
                                        (770) 973-5385
                                     (770) 933-7755 (Office)
                                     (770) 955-5092 (FAX)

                                     WILLIAM P. VITITOE
                         Former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President
                            Washington Natural Gas Company, Seattle, WA
                                           Address:
                                      No. 1, Dodge Place
                                    Grosse Pointe, MI 48230
                                        P.O. Box 36203
                                  Grosse Pointe Farms, MI 48236
                                 (313) 886-7071 (FAX rolls over)

                                     J. CLIFFORD DODD
                                     Chief Information Officer
                                     Ameritech Corporation
                                           Address:
                                 2000 W. Ameritech Center Drive
                                        Mail Stop 4H-41
                                  Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60196
                                        (847) 248-4600
                           (847) 248-4602 (Lorelei Anderson, Admin. Asst.)
                                     (847) 248-7155 (FAX)

                       KARL, ZORBIST - Secretary, Counsel and Interim
President
                                Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin LLP
                                   2300 Main Street, Suite 1100
                                   Kansas City, Missouri 64108
                                        (816) 983-8171
                                     (816) 983-8080 (FAX)
                                     kzobrist@bspmlaw.com

Our proposal is due in about 60 days, therefore we would hope to start
exchanging help with each other soon.

Please let me know if you need more information?

We appreciate your help.

Thank you,
Dick George
ALSTOM ESCA


---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001 05:09 PM
---------------------------
From: Fred Philipson/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/09/2001 04:46 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Apollo/ENRON@enronXgate, Rahil
Jafry/ENRON@enronXgate, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob M
Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Draft  - Offsite in April 4-9.ppt

Here,s the latest.  Recent efforts have focused on clarifying the &who, what,
how, when, why and where,s8 of the project.  Please direct your feedback to
me.

Thanks,

Fred
5-9323


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/07/2001 11:00 AM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	05/04/2001 12:07 PM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (01-147) Use of Letters of Credit, Certain Securities and
Deliverable Warehouse Receipts as Margin...

Notice # 01-147
May 4, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX and COMEX Members and Member Firms

FROM:
Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:
Use of Letters of Credit, Certain Securities and Deliverable Warehouse
Receipts as Margin  for NYMEX and COMEX Transactions

DATE:
May 4, 2001
===========================================================

! Please be advised that the NYMEX Board of Directors has approved changes to
NYMEX and COMEX Clearing Association rules, which have also been filed with
the CFTC, that expand the types of non-cash assets that customers may deposit
with their Clearing Members for margin purposes.

! Specifically, the rule changes, which are attached below, permit the use of
letters of credit, certain securities and deliverable warehouse receipts by
customers to meet their margin requirements. The rule changes provide for
consistent treatment in the use of such assets for both NYMEX and COMEX
Divisions.

! Letters of Credit.  As a result of the rule changes, letters of credit
(LCs) now will be allowed for customer margin on both divisions.

! Use of Letters of Credit on Pass-Through Basis.  In addition, the rule
changes allow letters of credit to be used on a &pass-through8 basis on both
divisions.  In other words, Clearing Members on both divisions will be able
to pledge to the applicable clearinghouse certain LCs posted by customers. It
should be noted that while securities and deliverable warehouse receipts, as
detailed below, may be used by customers for margin purposes, such assets may
not be used on a pass-through basis by a Clearing Member to meet its margin
obligations with the clearinghouse.

! Securities. Customers also will be able to deposit with their Clearing
Members certain types of securities as margin. The types of acceptable
securities are the kinds of securities that have been accepted for some time
on the COMEX Division.  Specifically, the rule changes will permit customers
to deposit the following types of securities as margin with Clearing Members
on either division:

securities listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. or the
American Stock Exchange, Inc., or which are traded in the over-the-counter
market approved for margin by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
Board except that such securities must be free from liens and encumbrances;
can represent no more than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of any one
issuer; and will be valued for purposes of margin at 75% of their market
value.

! Deliverable Warehouse Receipts. On both divisions, deliverable warehouse
receipts for any of the commodities traded on the Exchange will be accepted
as customer margin provided that such receipts will be valued as margin at no
more than 75% of the value of the commodity.

! Effective Date. These rule changes will go into effect on June 1, 2001.

! Exchange Form for Pass-Through Letters of Credit.  A follow-up Notice to
Clearing Members will be distributed shortly that will include a form
prepared by NYMEX that will serve as the authorized  uniform form for
irrevocable letters of credit for use on a pass-through basis at the Exchange
.

If you have any questions concerning this change, please contact Bernard
Purta, Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Operations, at (212)
299- 2380; Arthur McCoy, Vice President, Financial Surveillance Section,
NYMEX Compliance Department, at (212) 299-2928; or Joseph Sanguedolce,
Director, Financial Surveillance Section, NYMEX Compliance Department, at
(212) 299-2855,.

AMENDMENTS TO NYMEX RULE 4.01 (&CUSTOMER,S MARGINS8), NYMEX RULE 9.05
(&MARGINS8) AND TO COMEX CLEARING ASSOCIATION RULE 48 (&DEPOSIT OF SECURITIES
AND LETTERS OF CREDIT AS ORIGINAL MARGIN8)

(Asterisks indicate additions; brackets indicate deletions.)

Rule 4.01. CUSTOMER'S MARGINS

(A) Initial margin at least equal to the level set for customers shall be
required of all customers. In no case shall a customer's initial margin be
less than a specified amount per contract, or a specified percentage of the
market value at which any commodity is bought or sold, such customer's margin
to be determined and announced by the Board of Directors or its designee.

 (B) Once the required initial margin has been deposited for each individual
transaction, such trade and such margin shall, for the purposes of this rule,
lose their individual identity and be commingled with all other trades and
margins in the same commodity for the same customer account.

 (C) When the margin (Net Liquidating Value plus Non-Cash Deposits) in a
customer's account declines below the maintenance margin requirement
applicable to the open positions carried in such account, the Member Firm
carrying said account is required to collect (call) from the customer such
funds, which when deposited, will restore it to the then prevailing initial
margin requirement.

 (D) A Member Firm shall not accept orders for new trades on behalf of an
undermargined customer account other than those which reduce its initial
margin requirement unless such Member Firm has been given assurances by said
customer that funds sufficient to restore the account to its then prevailing
initial margin requirement are forthcoming and will be received in a
reasonable amount of time not to exceed one business day for Floor Members
and three business days for all other customers.

(E)(1) A Member Firm may accept deposits from its customers in one or more of
the following forms as margin to cover open NYMEX Division positions:

 (a) United States Currency; or any currency freely convertible to United
States currency; provided that if foreign currency is deposited, its value
shall be calculated so that at the current rate of exchange the U.S. dollar
equivalent of the foreign currency satisfies the customer's margin obligation.

 (b) securities issued by the Department of the Treasury of the United States
maturing within ten (10) years of the date of the deposit and guaranteed as
to principal and interest by the United States Government. Such securities
shall be valued at ninety five percent (95%) of par value.

*(c) securities which are listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. or the American Stock Exchange, Inc., or which are traded in the
over-the-counter market approved for margin by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve Board provided that such securities; (i) are free from liens
and encumbrances; (ii) represent no more than 5% of the issued and
outstanding shares of any one issuer; and (iii) are valued at 75% of the
market value thereof;

(d) a letter of credit in favor of a clearing member carrying an account, or
in the case of any letter or credit to be used on a pass-through basis with
the Clearing House a letter of credit in favor of the Exchange.  All letters
of credit shall be issued in such form as may be prescribed by the Exchange
and by a depository which has been approved by the Exchange for issuance and
confirmation of letters of credit drawn in favor of the Clearing Members or
in favor of the Exchange, as applicable.

(e) deliverable warehouse receipts for commodities traded on the Exchange
provided that such receipts will be valued as margin at no more than 75% of
the value of the commodity.*

[(c)] *(f)* The net liquidating value in a customer's account over the
initial margin requirements for the positions carried for such account.

(2) A Member Firm may accept deposits from its customers in one or more of
the following forms as margin to cover open COMEX Division positions:

(a) United States currency, checks payable in United States currency, or
currency freely convertible to United States currency; provided that if
foreign currency is deposited, its value shall be calculated so that at the
current rate of exchange the U.S. dollar equivalent of the foreign currency
satisfies the customer's margin obligations;

(b) the net liquidating value in a customer's account over the initial margin
requirements for the positions carried for such account;

(c) securities issued or guaranteed by the United States, provided that such
securities shall be valued at the lower of the par or market value thereof;

(d) securities which are listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. or the American Stock Exchange, Inc., or which are traded in the
over-the-counter market approved for margin by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve Board provided that such securities; (i) are free from liens
and encumbrances; (ii) represent no more than 5% of the issued and
outstanding shares of any one issuer; and (iii) are valued at 75% of the
market value thereof;

(e) *deliverable* warehouse receipts *for commodities traded on the Exchange
provided that such receipts will be valued as margin at no more than 75% of
the value of the commodity*; [provided that such warehouse receipts shall be
valued in accordance with the following:

(i) if the warehouse receipt is for a deliverable grade of the commodity
underlying either the futures contract sold or the futures contract which is
the subject of the call options sold, not more than 90% of the value of the
commodity may be considered as margin; and;

(ii) if the warehouse receipt is for a deliverable grade of the futures
contract purchased or the put options sold, not more than 75% of the value of
the commodity may be considered as margin; and;

(iii) if the warehouse receipt is for either: (A) deliverable grade of a
commodity other than the commodity underlying the futures contract or option
to be margined; or (B) a form of silver or gold not deliverable under a
futures contract, then not more than 75% of the value of the warehouse
receipt may be considered as margin.]

(f) physical commodities (but not forward contracts therefor) if the carrying
member is in possession and control of negotiable documents covering such
commodities, provided, however, that the value of such commodities shall be
based upon the contract market price for the grade of such commodity or if
the commodity is not of a grade deliverable on a contract market, then at the
price for the grade of such commodity on the spot market;

(g) a letter of credit in favor of a clearing member carrying an account*, or
in the case of any letter or credit to be used on a pass-through basis with
the Clearing House a letter of credit in favor of the Exchange.  All letters
of credit shall be* issued in such form as may be prescribed by the Exchange
and by a depository which has been approved by the Exchange for issuance and
confirmation of letters of credit drawn in favor of the Clearing Members *or
in favor of the Exchange, as applicable.*

 (3) Calls issued by Member Firms for additional margin from customers may
only be met by: deposits conforming to the requirements of Rule 4.01(E)(1)
for open NYMEX Division positions, or conforming to the requirements of Rule
4.01(E)(2) for open COMEX Division positions, or, for open positions on
either division of the Exchange, favorable market movements which, when taken
into consideration and combined with any other monies available, enable the
customer's margin to equal or exceed the then prevailing initial margin
requirement.

 (F) Withdrawals of margin from a customer's account may only be permitted by
a Member Firm carrying such account if the remaining funds in such account
are equal to or in excess of the then prevailing initial margin required of
the applicable open positions at the time of said withdrawal request.

(G) The customer's response to a margin call issued by a Member Firm must be
timely and complete. A Member Firm may call, at any time, for margins above
and beyond the minimums required by the Exchange. A Member Firm may liquidate
any or all positions maintained by a customer for failure to meet a margin
call. The customer will be liable for any loss or deficiency resulting
therefrom.

 (H) The margin requirements established by the Board or its designee may
vary for different commodities and may be changed from time to time by the
Board or its designee, and in the discretion of the Board or its designee,
may be made applicable to all open trades as well as new trades.

 (I) Arbitrage

(1) For the purposes of Exchange margin requirements, an arbitrage position
is a purchase or sale of an Exchange futures contract in one delivery month
which futures contract is offset by a futures contract to sell or to purchase
a similar quantity of a related commodity in the same or different delivery
month which offsetting futures contract is executed on or subject to the
rules of a different exchange. In order to qualify as an arbitrage position,
each contract long and short must be carried by the same member firm for the
same account.

(2) The Board of Directors, by resolution, may identify those futures
contracts, that are executable on and/or subject to the rules of a different
exchange, which shall be deemed to qualify as part of an arbitrage position.

(3) The Board of Directors or its designee may set levels of margin for
arbitrage positions at a rate less than applicable to outright positions;
provided, however, that except for interdivision straddles, no such rate
shall be lower than the rates established for clearing members' margins.

Rule 9.05. MARGINS

* * * *
(E) Clearing Members may meet original margin calls by depositing:

(1) Cash (U.S. Currency);

(2) Original Margin Certificates issued by an original margin depository, in
form acceptable to the Clearing House, for delivery to the order of the
Clearing House, representing securities issued by the Department of Treasury
of the United States of America maturing within ten (10) years from the date
of the deposit and guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United
States Government; such securities shall be valued at ninety five percent
(95%) of the par value; or

(3) Subject to a maximum limit of 50% of the Clearing Member's total original
margin obligations, Irrevocable Letters of Credit payable to the order of the
Clearing House *including such Letters of Credit that are deposited with the
Clearing Member in accordance with Exchange procedures by a customer*, in
form acceptable to the Clearing House, issued by or confirmed by an original
margin depository and having an expiration date of not less than three (3) or
more than eighteen (18) months from the date of issuance; provided, however,
that such Letter of Credit may not be used to meet original margin
obligations during the fifteen calendar days prior to the expiration date
thereof (if the fifteenth day prior to the expiration of the Letter of Credit
is not a business day, the period during which such Letter of Credit may not
be used to meet original margin obligations shall begin on the business day
immediately preceding that day); and, provided further, that on the business
d!
ay!
 preceding the fifteenth calendar day prior to the expiration of the Letter
of Credit, the Clearing House shall issue a call for original margin to be
deposited in a form and manner acceptable to the Clearing House for positions
held open as of the close of business on that day and margined by the Letter
of Credit. The Clearing House shall have the unqualified right to call on any
Letter of Credit at any time prior to expiration.

CCA Rule 48. DEPOSIT OF SECURITIES AND LETTERS OF CREDIT A ORIGINAL MARGIN

* * * *
(b) Irrevocable Letters of Credit.

(i) The Corporation will accept as original margin for the full face amount
thereof a letter of credit in favor of the Corporation issued by any
institution selected by the depositor *including such Letters of Credit in
favor of the Corporation that are deposited with the Clearing Member in
accordance with Exchange procedures by a customer*, provided that

(A) such  institution has been approved by the Board as an approved
depository or such institution is organized under the laws of the United
States or the laws of any state and the letter of credit issued by such
institution has been confirmed by an approved depository;
(B) that the aggregate amount of letters of credit which may be accepted at
any time from any one approved depository, or for the account of any one
Clearing Member may be limited by the Board from time to time;
(C) that a letter of credit issued on behalf of a Clearing Member by an
institution which is an affiliated firm of such Clearing Member must be
confirmed by an institution which is not an affiliated firm of such Clearing
Member; and
(D) such letter of credit shall be in form and substance approved by the
Board and shall be in such denominations as may be determined by the Board
from time to time; shall be irrevocable, shall be available to be drawn upon
by the Corporation by  a clean sight draft(s) or written demand(s) and shall
run for a period of not less than ninety (90) days from the date of issue.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdoc
=(01-147)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Hello,

 My name is Vince Kaminski. I work in Houston and I used to work for AIESEC
in Poland
in the 1970s.

I shall be glad to meet you when you visit Houston.

I hope your traineeships are going well.

Vince Kaminski


Dear Members of the MC, BIC, OC, and TIE List,

Attached, please find the NYISO Weekly Update.  This
Update is written jointly by Elaine Robinson and other
NYISO staff.

The NYISO Weekly Update provides a brief status report of, or
progress on, a range of issues that are under discussion at
NYISO Committee meetings or are being undertaken by NYISO
Staff.  Many, but not all, of these issues are being addressed
through the NYISO Committee structure.

Market participants may raise any comments or questions on
items covered in the Update through the Committee structure,
or directly to Elaine Robinson (erobinson@nyiso.com).

You can find prior editions of the Weekly Update on the
"NYISO Committees" page of the NYISO web site:
http://www.nyiso.com ---> Services ---> Committees ---> Weekly Update

or by clicking on the following link:
http://www.nyiso.com/services/documents/groups/weekly_updates/wkly_updates.html

(See attached file: Weekly081001_r2.pdf)

 - Weekly081001_r2.pdf


<<NP 15 pages.xls>>  <<SP 15 pages.xls>>

 - NP 15 pages.xls
 - SP 15 pages.xls


fyi   Marg.
---------------------- Forwarded by Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron on 01/21/2000
07:31 AM ---------------------------

Doug Leach@ECT
01/21/2000 07:00 AM
To: Guy Dayvault/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Goughary/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade Doshier/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David J Botchlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Poten & Partners

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 01/21/2000 06:58 AM
---------------------------

Doug Leach
01/20/2000 03:47 PM
To: Michael L Brown/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: David A Terlip/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kevin
Beasley/LON/ECT@ECT, John Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT, Michel Decnop/SIN/ECT@ECT,
Maurizio La Noce/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marc De La
Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Poten & Partners

Just some of George Gail's observations:

He expects WTI crude prices to return to a range of $19-$22/barrel by 2Q 2000
(Brent $18-$20) although emotions rather than fundamentals will continue to
drive the market.
Saudi's sold Cal 00 naphtha at $8 M/T over the Platt's AG mean and the
Kuwaiti's are offer their naphtha at $11 M/T over the mean.
ENOC offered 700,000 tons of term naphtha and only sold 200,000 tons.
ADNOC's splitters should add even more naphtha supplies to the market.
Koch has closed their Rotterdam splitter due to poor economics. Not
necessarily a permanent shutdown.
He expects the Brent/Dubai spread to return to more normal $1-$1.25/barrel.
Regarding condensate he predicts that actual demand will drive the market and
there will be less bottomfeeding by the Japanese and other refiners. He does
feel         the new splitters will reduce the worldwide volumes available,
but that there will still be adequate supplies.
He thinks crack spreads for refiners will still be weak during Cal 00.
Although some resid demand will be displaced by natural gas or LNG, he
expects fairly stable differentials to crude.
He expects strong US gasoline demand, but limits his demand growth projection
to 1% for the year.


I'm up for Wed. pm assuming a flight from denver to dc is available .
Martha--please check and make sure there is a late flight from denver to
dc--leaving after 5 pm would be best.  pls coordinate with jeff.  thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 07/14/2000
11:06 AM ---------------------------

"George Briden" <gbriden.snakehill@worldnet.att.net> on 07/14/2000 09:17:50 AM
To: "Jeff Fawcett" <Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com>
cc: "Drew Fossum" <dfossum@enron.com>

Subject: Fw: Denver Meeting

Jeff:
Please note the message below.  If you can help us out, that would be great,
but I have passed along the word that we need to wrap up with you by 3:30 or
so.
In any event, I'll see you there.
GB

----- Original Message -----
From: <TCPrenger@aol.com>
To: <gbriden.snakehill@worldnet.att.net>
Cc: <lcarpenter@caithnessenergy.com>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: Denver Meeting

> George,
>
> The address is:
>
> Caithness Corporation
> 7887 E. Belleview Ave.  Suite 1100
> Englewood, CO   80111
> 303 228-1638
>
> I have reserved a conference room for Wednesday PM and all day Thursday.
> Our office is located in the Denver Tech Center. The Marriott, Hyatt, and
> Wyndam hotels are all located nearby.
>
> What time are we planning to meet Wednesday afternoon? Larry and I will
> becoming from a meeting in Keystone, CO (2 hours away) that day. I would
> suggest late PM,  say 3-4 PM.
>
> Tim
>


Outlook Migration Team
05/14/2001 01:02 PM
To: Elena Chilkina/Enron@EnronXGate, Jose Marquez/Enron@EnronXGate, Kevin G
Moore/Enron@EnronXGate, Mike A Roberts/Enron@EnronXGate, Tony
Hamilton/EU/Enron@Enron, William Smith/Enron@EnronXGate, Alan
McGaughy/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy Burrell/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, James
Posway/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Maritta Mullet/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Mitcham/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Brian Swinford/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan
Jones/GasPlant/TS/ECT@ECT, Bob Brandt/NA/Enron@Enron, Charles
Upshaw/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harvey Mitchell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Henry Terech/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Thomas/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken N
Byrd/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Gray/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rusty
Gourley/NA/Enron@Enron, Stan Jablonski/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tara
Soyal/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adrian Ausucua/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian
Zatarain/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carol Howes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Denise Almoina/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Denka
Wangdi/NA/Enron@Enron, Eduardo Robles/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Elio Tortolero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Felicia
Legier/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Felipe Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Frances Reese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jana L
Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joy
Oliver/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kari
Duncan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Sparks/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lisa B Alderman/NA/Enron@Enron,
Maria Alejandra Romero/SA/Enron@Enron, Mariella
Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rudolf
Bond/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sean
Long/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Jernigan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Hirsh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Timothy B
Rebhorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Veronica Medrano/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Veronica Perez/NA/Enron@Enron, Wendi
Hoelscher/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Yen
Nguyen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lia
Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tamara Carter/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tracy
Wood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nikita Ford/NA/Enron@Enron, Amy
Villasenor/OTS/Enron@Enron, Debra Young/OTS/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Arnold/OTS/Enron@ENRON, John Reese/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Josh
Mayes/OTS/Enron@Enron, Larry Fenstad/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Adleman/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ann Johnson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Lynne
Dix/OTS/Enron@Enron, Mike Thomas/OTS/Enron@Enron, Morris
Brassfield/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rinetia Turner/OTS/Enron@Enron, Robert
Geheb/OTS/Enron@Enron, Tyrone Brown/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Billy
Dorsey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Earl Hailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth
Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lena Lacey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Office of the
Chairman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally
Keepers/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Suzanne
Danz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tori L Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bridget Fraser/NY/ECT@ECT,
John Haggerty/Corp/Enron@Enron, Murdoch Morrison/NY/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL 5-16-01

Current Notes User:

To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook,
it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of
migration.  Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following
survey. Double Click on document to put it in "Edit" mode. When you finish,
simply click on the 'Reply With History' button then hit 'Send'  Your survey
will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.

Thank you.

Outlook 2000 Migration Team

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------

Full Name:        Jeffrey K. Skilling

Login ID:  jskilli

Extension:  x3-6894

Office Location:  EB5007

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop,  Laptop,  Both)  Desktop

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot,
Jornada)  Yes, Palm Pilot

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?  No
    If yes, who?

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?  Yes
    If yes, who?  Sherri Sera, Joannie Williamson
Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?  No
    If yes, who?

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?  Yes
    If yes, who?  Sherri Sera, Joannie Williamson

Do you have access to a shared calendar?  No
    If yes, which shared calendar?

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for
mass mailings)?  No
    If yes, please list here:

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will
need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From: 8:00a     To:      6:00p

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc? No
       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):


Further to our conversation,  please see the attached GISB draft for
KeySpan.  Please give me a call if you have any questions.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Please refer to the memo from Billy Lemons, Steve Kean and me dated May 11 regarding 2001 Western Hemisphere Associate & Analyst PRC Program.

Miguel Padron
05/11/2001 10:21 AM
To:	Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	Re: ASSOCIATE PRC

Stan, Any feedback ? (see below).   Please let me know.  Thanks, Miguel

Stanley Horton
04/05/2001 04:17 PM
Sent by:	Cindy Stark
To:	Miguel Padron/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dawn Doucet/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	ASSOCIATE PRC

This is to advise you that we are still working on your individual issues regarding the lack of representation in your specific areas on the Associate PRC Committee.   I will keep you posted on the outcome.

Thanks,
Stan Horton
Chairman & CEO
Enron Transportation Services Company


Hi there,

I'm thinking of working out after work - hopefully kind of early.  Ok with
you?  I should still be home before 730.

Michael took Bronco to school.  I'm sure he will have him at the CC.

Kay


your message, dearie.


Russ, could you kill this deal please?  I keep getting a weird message when I
try to kill it.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001 03:51
PM ---------------------------

Brenda H Fletcher
04/02/2001 09:10 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Outstanding Deal

I don't see anything scheduled on this deal number.

	From:  Chris Germany                           03/30/2001 06:49 PM

To: Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Outstanding Deal

Can you tell me if we have anything scheduled on this deal number for this
contract please?

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2001 06:49
PM ---------------------------

Sylvia A Campos
03/28/2001 10:41 AM
To: Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Outstanding Deal

Please have the following deal KILLED by the Sitara Group so that it does not
show up in our portfolio.  Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001
10:40 AM ---------------------------

Sylvia A Campos
03/16/2001 08:36 AM
To: Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect
Subject: Outstanding Deal

Judy,
Please have the following deal KILLED.  Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2001
08:31 AM ---------------------------

Sylvia A Campos
03/06/2001 10:28 AM
To: Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Outstanding Deal

Judy,
Please have the following deal KILLED by the Sitara Group so that it does not
show up in our portfolio.  Thanks


When: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:30 PM-2:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: ECS 6716

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Please note,

This meeting is in reference to the email sent to all of you this morning from Laura Luce.  Please accept this invite, as it will automatically populate onto your schedules.

Thank you,

Irena Hogan
Sr. Administrative Assistant
(713) 853-6143


Don:

As discussed, I am attaching my resume. I will give you a call after you had a chance to review it.

Thanks,

Husnain Mirza
Phone: 713-853-9541
husnain_mirza@enron.net


---------------------- Forwarded by Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001
02:39 PM ---------------------------

Christian Yoder

02/14/2001 02:57 PM
To: civalek@hdw.com, jbpirog@hdw.com
cc:
Subject: contractual language

John,
For the call at 4, here are some contractual provisions, and a piece on CPUC
talking points.  These are very much still in process and we reserve the
right to modify our language or add new terms, but wanted to show you where
we are in our thinking at this point. ----cgy


Richard:

I have spoken with Jeff Blumenthal (US tax) about your request as I think he
would be better suited to provide your advice.  Jeff cannot make your
conference call tomorrow but I have forwarded to him this message and your
diagrams from last week.  If you could provide Jeff with a short description
of any issues, he will be glad to respond this week.

Thanks.  Sara

New meeting request from Richard Sage

  11/28/2000 10:00 AM Local Time
  11/28/2000 11:00 AM Local Time

Title: New US Entities (Denis's office)
Location:  -No room information available-

Chair:  Richard Sage/LON/ECT

To (required): David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT, Rod
Nelson/LON/ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT, Kellie Naven/LON/ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT
cc (optional): Erica Gut/LON/ECT

Discuss implications of implementing entities of the attached.


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000
06:57 PM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
12/06/2000 05:51 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: [Fwd: Fw: PRICELESS]

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000
05:51 PM --------------------------->
>

 - pic26962.jpg


i will just meet you there


I have asked Taffy to schedule an interview with the above candidate from
10:30 -11:30 on Monday.  Sara and I spoke with her today and think that it is
apprpritae to have her come back to met you.  Plesae let Taffy know ASAP if
you cannot attend.  Hopefully we can make a decision next week.
Carol


I also received a call today from Luralene Tapahe, Esq. of the NNERTF and the
Department of Justice concerning another client. I took advantage of the call
to discuss with Ms. Tapahe my discussion of March 16th with Akhtar Zaman and
she generally confirmed what Mr. Zaman had told me.

Ms. Tapahe also advised me that as of today, no replacement on the NNERTF from
the President's Office had been made for Sharon Noel, Esq. whom, as you know,
is (acting) Chief of Staff and, apparently, will be too busy to serve on the
NNERTF.

As you probably know, there is a big meeting in Window Rock next week called
by
President Begaye to discuss whether the Navajo Nation should try to charter
its
own bank (more broadly, on the subject of how to find capital for
development).
The cast of characters for this meeting is quite impressive. If anyone wants a
copy of the agenda, please let me know.

Finally, I attended a meeting of the Navajo Nation Council's Judiciary
Committee yesterday. After some spirited debate, they agreed to recommend to
the full Council a "Little Tucker Act" with a limited waiver of sovereign
immunity to enforce contracts.

Lawrence A. Ruzow

Louis.Soldano@enron.com wrote:

> Mr. Zaman called Larry yesterday to discuss the most recent offer.
>
> Larry had the opportunity to discuss with Mr. Zaman the sense of urgency on
> TW's part and the desire to meet with the decision making body - the
> NNERTF.  Apparently Mr. Zaman was of the impression that TW would not be
> pressed to take legal action until the ROW expired.
>
> Mr. Zaman was encouraged by the TW approach of an incentive but offered no
> insights on the acceptability of the offer.  He did promised to review it
> with the task force in the near future and indicated that Johnny could
> expect a response in the near future regarding the letter and the request
> for a meeting.


Hi Doug,

I hear you are working on the Midway deal.  Me, too.   I want to go back to
the restaurant  you suggested with the remarkable decor and wine list (was it
Burns, something like that?).

 I look forward to working with you on this one.

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/11/2000 02:03
PM ---------------------------

"Thomas Mueller" <tmueller@rhm.com.mx> on 02/11/2000 08:56:50 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: [LETTER TO AI

 Kay,

it has become later than I anticipated (and wanted).
Attached is the revised letter.

Saludos
Thomas

 - 7SK01!2.DOC


Late Wednesday, FERC issued a notice of staff conference discussing issues
pertinent to Order No. 637.  This is the second of three public conferences
to be held on January 31 at 1:00 p.m. to be held at FERC's offices. Panel
Participants will be debating issues concerning the market consequences of
transactions between pipelines and affiliates.  Since parties will not be
making an oral presentation, it is requested that written comments be
submitted to FERC by January 5, 2001 to 1) provide input on how to structure
the discussion; 2) identify issues and examples to foster a meaningful
dialog; and 3) suggest questions the staff moderator may wish to pose to the
panel.  Attached is the Notice.

Notice


how about we celebrate the near completion of your deal and have tickleless pay for it.

From:	Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 01:26 PM
To:	John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	RE:

push the summer down about $.03-.04 so I can get one of my deals done and we could celebrate!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, John
Sent:	Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:07 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S.
Subject:

wanna get sauced after work?


Here is the other information on PJM.


Errol:
I did not write up these access trades from Friday.  Please make sure they
are in.
John
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 11/05/2000 04:42
PM ---------------------------

"Mancino, Joseph (NY Int)" <JMANCINO@edfman.com> on 11/03/2000 08:26:02 AM
To: "'jarnold@enron.com'" <jarnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: ACCESS Trades 11/03/00

Greg asked me send you the ACCESS trades you did last night/this morning.

B     37     Z       4720
B     13     Z       4810
B      5      Z       4815
S     20     H       4436

Thank you.

Joseph Mancino
E.D. & F. Man International
(212)566-9700


You may want to come to this meeting.  When we met with Bob Hall the other
dayon OA, I mentioned that you and I should probably be included in the
monthly meeting so that we would have an idea of any problems that were
occurring each month.  If you have something else going on, don't worry about
being there.  I'll relay the info to you.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 08/30/2000
12:51 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           08/30/2000 07:47 AM

To: Delma Salazar/NA/Enron@Enron, Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: OA Meeting

We will have our monthly OA review tomorrow at 10 am with Steve Jackson.  I
will let you know the conference room soon.

Dave


You assume correctly.

David Forster
12/13/99 07:22 AM
To: Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Legal and Privacy

Donna/Dale: Can you please upload the attached version to the database?

Mark: I assume you will not have any concerns regarding these changes. If
this is not the case, please contact me as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/LON/ECT on 13/12/99 13:19
---------------------------

Edmund Cooper
13/12/99 11:35
To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Legal and Privacy

Dear Dave,

Justin and I have had another look at the website and noticed that the old
Legal & Privacy statement is the one being shown.  The additional language in
the mark-up below needs to be added before European counterparties access the
site to trade.

In respect of Finland, we have been in contact with our Finnish legal
advisers and hope to have the issue resolved (hopefully favourably) today.

Thanks, Edmund.

---------------------- Forwarded by Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT on 13/12/99 11:31
---------------------------

Edmund Cooper
16/09/99 15:36
To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Legal and Privacy

Dave,

I've now been given access to the Online system, and I've also seen the
website - it's all looking pretty good.  However, I noticed on reading
through the Legal & Privacy statement that there is some text missing!! I've
attached a mark-up showing the missing text (red and bold) which needs to be
in there.

Regards, Edmund.