Do i need to forget about this gas or is he still letting it breathe

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tomaski, Richard
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 5:21 PM
To:	Storey, Geoff
Subject:	RE: Harper gas

Nothing done yet, but TC is coming in tomorrow for a special Friday workplace appearance to try to close something.  Actually, his tee-time is canceled due to weather

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Storey, Geoff
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:29 PM
To:	Tomaski, Richard
Subject:	RE: Harper gas

NBPL Ventura transfer point, IF vent + 0.0125 bid. sure

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tomaski, Richard
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:19 PM
To:	Storey, Geoff
Subject:	RE: Harper gas

Do you still want that Vent (nov-oct) for Vent + .0125?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Storey, Geoff
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 1:34 PM
To:	Tomaski, Richard
Subject:	RE: Harper gas

NBPL Harper transfer point, IF Vent + 0.05 or IF NGPL MidCont + .185 bid

good to fill any volume

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tomaski, Richard
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:14 AM
To:	Storey, Geoff
Subject:	Harper gas

Tony only offer so far is from Husky at Ventua plus .03 (nov-mar).  He is still looking for better offers


Jeff, info on the latest draw. Everything seems Ok with the exception of some unsigned forms by you or your representative as well as the revised draw request.
-----Original Message-----
From:   Temica Lacy
Sent:   Friday, July 13, 2001 10:51 AM
To:     Fernando Parra
Cc:     Shelly Lambert
Subject:        RE: Jeffrey Skilling/#10386513
Please note we have received a revised draw request that includes Change Order # 28 i/a/o $80,978.49 and the borrower signature is missing.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From:   Temica Lacy
Sent:   Tuesday, July 10, 2001 7:43 AM
To:     Fernando Parra
Cc:     Shelly Lambert
Subject:        Jeffrey Skilling/#10386513

Have received a draw request and the following is needed to process:

1. Architect needs to certify the G702 Application for Payment

2. Borrower needs to sign  the Draw Request Form

3. Borrower needs to sign the Contractor Disbursement Disclosure

4. Change Order #25 for $29,297.51

Inspection will be ordered.

Thanks!

Temica T. Lacy
Southwest Bank of Texas
Real Estate Processor
713-232-1695

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
************************************************************************
The information contained in this ELECTRONIC MAIL transmission
is confidential.  It may also be privileged work product or proprietary
information. This information is intended for the exclusive use of the
addressee(s).  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution [other
than to the addressee(s)], copying or taking of any action because
of this information is strictly prohibited.
************************************************************************


Daren,

The above meter flowed on the 215K for 3/2000.  I has flow for the first two
days of this month (Sitara deal #205569-deal ends 3/31/2000).

Can you please see if the deal can be extended or if the gas should be placed
on stranger's?

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/28/2001 04:39 PM -----

	eserver@enron.com
	03/28/2001 09:55 AM

		 To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - RLB-Florida

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Robert L. Bradley Jr
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: RLB-Florida
Report Total: $537.19
Amount Due Employee: $537.19

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


You have received this email because the requester specified you as their VP. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000037663&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000037663
Request Create Date : 5/30/01 9:34:44 AM
Requested For       : david.forster@enron.com
Resource Name       : Global Messaging North America Additional Mailbox Space (25 Meg Increase)
Resource Type       : Applications


yeah baby.  i was there two weeks ago and there were hotties everywhere.  i
am going to come home in the early part of july and we will figure out the
final details.


---------------------- Forwarded by Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2001 10:05 AM
---------------------------
From: Amanda Huble/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/20/2001 10:03 AM
To: Airam Arteaga/ENRON@enronXgate, Kimberly Bates/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Quezada/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Young/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kimberly Hardy/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jessica Presas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Vuittonet/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: Please forward this to your groups.

PIRA is coming in May to do their semi-annual energy outlook.

Greg Shuttlesworth- North American Natural Gas --- May 14th 3-5 pm (30 C1)
? New Production Outlook
? Price Direction
? Demand Fundamentals

Dr. Gary Ross - World Oil Outlook --- May 16th 7-8:30 am --32C2
? OIl/ Demand/ supply Outlook
? Regional balances
? OPEC Rhetoric

Jen Fraser
34759


See attached

From: Karen Denne/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/12/2001 08:33 PM

To: Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications

cc: Mark Palmer/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Kelly
Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron Communications

Subject: EBS Article for eBiz

Jim and Ken --

Attached is an article for eBiz (our biweekly online newsletter), which we
are scheduled to launch at 7:30 a.m. Friday.  Kelly Kimberly has reviewed it,
but has asked that you view the article as well.  Since only EBS employees
received your memo about the restructuring -- and the rest of the employees
did not receive any communication -- it is extremely important to provide
information through this vehicle.

Please let me know of your approval or if you have any questions.

Thank you.
Karen
x39757


Mr. Oldham:
Thanks.  Ed Sacks and Wendy Conwell from our credit group will be attending
with me.  I will send to you early next week a list of our questions.  I am
assuming that you are familiar with the EEI Master Agreement between Reliant
and EPMI.  If you need a copy, please contact me or Janet
Greene.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	boldham@reliant.com
	05/16/2001 04:32 PM

		 To: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
		 cc: jkgreene@reliant.com
		 Subject: ENRON Surety Bond as Collateral

Ms. St. Clair:

This will confirm my conversation with Susanne of your office wherein this
meeting is set at ENRON for Thursday, May 24 at 2:00PM.  We will ask for
you when we check in at security.

Thankyou

Bill Oldham
Director, Insurance Risk Management
Reliant Energy Incorporated
Telephone No.713/207-3131
FAX No. 713/207-3251
email:    bill-oldham@reliantenergy.com
----- Forwarded by Bill Oldham/ADM/HouInd on 05/16/01 04:29 PM -----

                    Bill Oldham
                                         To:     Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
                    05/15/01             cc:     Janet K
Greene/ADM/HouInd@HouInd, Eddie R
                    08:32 AM             Meche/TTG/HouInd@HouInd, Bill T
Hamilton/TTG/HouInd@HouInd, Rex
                                         Clevenger/ADM/HouInd@HouInd, William
Waller/ADM/HouInd@HouInd
                                         Subject:     ENRON Surety Bond as
Collateral

Ms. St. Clair:

I am the Director of Insurance Risk Management at Reliant and Janet Greene
asked me to set up a conference call and/or meeting with you to answer any
questions that you and your credit people may have about our proposal to
utilize surety bonds as collateral with ENRON.  If you will send me a
couple of dates and times for  the week of May 21 Re when you are
available, I will arrange to have representatives from Aon, the broker for
Reliant who is also  the issuing agent for the sureties in this matter,
available for discussion with you and your people, either for a conference
call or in a meeting at ENRON, if you prefer.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Thankyou,

Bill Oldham
Director, Insurance Risk Management
Reliant Energy Incorporated
Telephone No.713/207-3131
FAX No. 713/207-3251
email:    bill-oldham@reliantenergy.com


The attached article (based upon another FERC leak) states that FERC will
lower the cap to $100 but will not (cannot) order refunds.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received: from mcafee.bracepatt.com by bracepatt.com; Tue, 28 Nov 2000
10:30:02 -0600
Received: FROM smtp.nwlink.com BY mcafee.bracepatt.com ; Tue Nov 28 10:35:48
2000 -0600
X-Proxy: keymaster.bracepatt.com protected
Received: from ccot-pentium (ip136.vanc7.pacifier.com [198.145.227.136]) by
smtp.nwlink.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id IAA24168; Tue, 28 Nov 2000
08:28:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <2.2.32.20001128162953.006dd1c4@zoo.e-z.net>
X-Sender: ccopat@zoo.e-z.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 08:29:53 -0800
To: tbradley@bracepatt.com, pfox@bracepatt.com,
doug.little@powerex.com,        mike.macdougall@powerex.com
From: Carol Opatrny <ccopat@e-z.net>
Subject: Fwd: DJ FERC To Lower Price Cap In Calif Pwr  Order-Commissioners

Greetings:
According to this article, the price cap in California will fall (to
$100/MWh) and, refunds will not (cannot) be ordered.
Carol

>23:05 GMT November 27, 2000 =DJ FERC To Lower Price Cap In Calif Pwr
>Order-Commissioners
>
>   By JASON LEOPOLD
>   Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
>
>LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will
>likely lower its proposed $150 per megawatt-hour "soft cap" on California's
>wholesale power prices to $100/MWh in its final order to repair the state's
>troubled electricity market, commissioners said Monday.
>But the commissioners told Dow Jones Newswires they won't order generators
>to refund billions of dollars in windfall profits earned last summer as a
>result of spiking power prices in the state, despite pleas from state
>lawmakers and Gov. Gray Davis, because they lack the authority to do so.
>"We still believe we cannot order refunds," one FERC commissioner said. "If
>there was an inch in the (Federal Power Act) that gave us the authority, we
>would take it. But that would destroy the future of deregulation."
>FERC released a report earlier this month that largely pinned California's
>ongoing power crisis on the structure of the state's wholesale electricity
>markets. The commission also issued a proposed order requiring changes
>needed to make the market workably competitive.
>The order found that electricity prices in the state rose to "unjust and
>unreasonable" levels last summer. But FERC fell short of ordering refunds,
>saying it lacked the legal authority to do so.
>Instead, FERC proposed changes to the governing boards of the state's two
>wholesale-market operators - the Independent System Operator and Power
>Exchange - said the state's three investor-owned utilities should no longer
>be required to buy a majority of their power from the CalPX, and proposed
>penalties for utilities that put off buying the power they need until the
>last minute.
>FERC also proposed capping the price paid to all bidders in California's
>power auctions at $150/MWh. Individual bidders could still get higher
>prices, but would have to justify their claims to FERC.
>FERC may issue its final order as early as Dec. 13, and commissioners said
>California shouldn't expect it to differ from the proposed changes
>recommended by FERC earlier this month.
>The comment period for FERC's draft order closed Nov. 22.
>(MORE) Dow Jones Newswires 27-11-00
>2305GMT
>Final Order Won't Order Refunds
>Davis warned FERC commissioners at a public hearing in San Diego two weeks
>ago that a failure to order refunds would produce a "ratepayer revolt."
>"Your proposed solution to our energy crisis does nothing to lower prices
>for California consumers," the Democratic governor told FERC on Nov. 13 at a
>meeting in San Diego. "Quite to the contrary, it is designed to bring our
>economy and our consumers to their knees."
>California's power regulators and utilities also pressed for refunds.
>The state's Public Utilities Commission said it has evidence of market abuse
>by generators and that consumers were overcharged $4 billion last summer for
>electricity.
>Edison International unit (EIX) Southern California Edison, in its response
>to the FERC order, attached a study by a Massachusetts Institute of
>Technology economist, who found "considerable evidence" generators and power
>marketers deliberately withheld supply from California from June through
>September - when power usage is at its peak - to drive up wholesale prices.
>But despite the allegations, FERC commissioners said they will not order
>refunds, though they said the state could legally return to cost-based
>rates.
>One commissioner also warned a lower "soft cap" of $100/MWh would likely
>deter generators from building new power plants in the state, even as it
>limited price spikes.
>"The truth of the matter is there is no painless or easy way for California
>to change its electricity market," the FERC commissioner said.
>
>   Consumer Groups Push Ballot Measure To Re-regulate
>
>Davis will file the changes the state wants made to the proposed order with
>FERC on Friday, but FERC commissioners said they don't expect to be swayed
>by the governor's filing.
>Meanwhile, Californians are steaming ahead with their own solutions.
>On Tuesday, the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, a Southern
>California consumer advocacy group, will hold a news conference announcing
>its own sweeping changes to the state's power market, which it will try to
>implement through a proposed ballot measure, the details of which have not
>been disclosed.
>Furthermore, state lawmakers plan on rewriting parts of AB1890, California's
>landmark restructuring law when the state Legislature convenes next year.
>There is already heated debate within the Legislature to reauthorize
>utilities to build power plants and to create a public utility system like
>Nebraska's, where there are no investor-owned utilities, in an effort to
>control power prices.
>"California lawmakers want to be re-elected in 2002," one key lawmaker close
>to the electricity issue said.
>And Davis is in meetings to replace the Cal-ISO and CalPX with a new entity
>to manage the power grid and the state's two wholesale power markets, said
>Steve Maviglio, Davis' press secretary.
>-By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
>jason.leopold@dowjones.com
>-0-
>Last week, FERC received hundreds of pages of comments to its proposed order
>for California's power market.
>(MORE) Dow Jones Newswires 27-11-00
>G_nther A. Pergher
>Senior Analyst
>Dow Jones & Company Inc.
>Tel.  609.520.7067
>Fax. 609.452.3531
>
>The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
>which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
>material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
>taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
>entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
>this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
>computer.
>
> <<Pergher, Gunther.vcf>>
>
>------_=_NextPart_000_01C05946.A1460FC0
>Content-Type:  application/octet-stream;
> name="Pergher, Gunther.vcf"
>Content-Disposition:  attachment;
> filename="Pergher, Gunther.vcf"
>
>BEGIN:VCARD
>VERSION:2.1
>N:Pergher;Gunther
>FN:Pergher, Gunther
>ORG:Dow Jones Newswires;News Gathering & Pdn
>TITLE:Sr Research Analyst
>TEL;WORK;VOICE:609-520-7067
>ADR;WORK:;South Brunswick NJ
>LABEL;WORK:South Brunswick NJ
>EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com
>REV:20001121T161855Z
>END:VCARD
>
>------_=_NextPart_000_01C05946.A1460FC0--
>
Carol Close Opatrny
Opatrny Consulting, Inc.
18509 N. E. Cedar Drive
Battle Ground, Washington 98604
360.666.8509 (fax)
360.666.8510 (phone)
e-mail: ccopat@e-z.net


==================================================
NOTE TO SUBSCRIBERS:
Due to the shutdowns on Capitol Hill, all access restrictions for
NationalJournal.com have been lifted. No password or "I.P. recognition" is
required to access Technology Daily or the rest of the site.
==================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL JOURNAL'S TECHNOLOGY DAILY AM EDITION
is now available at http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

MORNING HIGHLIGHTS:

ON THE HILL: The odds for quick Senate action on economic stimulus dimmed.

E-COMMERCE: A House committee will revisit the issue of Internet gambling.

BUDGET: The House passed a spending plan that would last until Nov. 16.

ON THE HILL: Two key Democrats vowed to continue their push for making
homeland security a Cabinet-level responsibility.

ALSO ON NATIONALJOURNAL.COM:
-- NATIONAL JOURNAL: Afghanistan Could Be The Easy Part
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/news/2001/10/1026nj1.htm

-- BILL STATUS: The Latest Updates On Key Legislation
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/news/bills/billprogress.htm

----------------------------
To stop receiving these E-mail Alerts:

Reply to this message and include the word "unsubscribe" (without quotes)
in the BODY of the message.
----------------------------

National Journal's Technology Daily is published daily by National Journal
Group Inc. For more information about National Journal Group's
publications, go to http://www.nationaljournal.com.


Since this was a fix to a Doorstep finding, how do we react?
---------------------- Forwarded by Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT on 16/11/2000
17:25 ---------------------------

	From:  Scott Mills                           14/11/2000 13:46

To: Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron, Julian Poole/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi
Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Julie Ramos/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laura Feldman/SA/Enron@Enron, Xochitl
Figueroa/NA/Enron@Enron, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Lavarato has stopped efforts for implementing Enpower in South America until
business activity increases enough to support it.

Based on below, we will start looking for someone with strong Access/Excel
knowledge to come up with a different solution.  Everyone will have to
regroup and determine next steps and look at revised timelines.

SRM (x33548)
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Mills/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 01:36
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Technology

	From:  Steve Nat @ ENRON                           11/14/2000 01:31 PM

To: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

FYI...

---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Nat/Corp/Enron on 11/14/2000 01:12
PM ---------------------------
Beth Perlman @ ECT   11/14/2000 11:53 AM

To: Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Nat/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

I discussed this with John Lavorato who is now responsible for this.  He said
don't do anything!  When their  volumes increase we can address the Enpower
implementation again.

Beth

	Richard Burchfield
	11/08/2000 08:17 AM

		 To: Steve Nat/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Steve,
 Come by my office to discuss.

Richard

	Enron Technology

	From:  Steve Nat @ ENRON                           11/08/2000 08:07 AM

To: Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Richard / Beth,  We have been asked by risk to get Argentina started on
EnPower.  Are you OK with us moving on this?  A couple things to consider...

Our instance strategy for EnPower is determined by geographic location
(bandwidth), volumes, and market similarity (functionality).  Based on this,
I want to set South America up on their own instance.  EnPower will have the
following instances long term:  EUR, US, CND, SA, AUS, JPN, IND.  We will
continue to pursue a common code base and logical data model.

There is additional time and cost associated with setting up a new instance,
however, I am concerned about continuing to pile new business units into a
production environment that will eventually need to be split.

Glad to discuss...  Please respond quickly, as we are waiting to pull the
trigger on this...

Steve

---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Nat/Corp/Enron on 11/08/2000 07:32
AM ---------------------------
From: Duong Luu@ECT on 11/07/2000 01:06 PM
To: Steve Nat/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth
Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: EnPower production - Argentina Power

fyi

----- Forwarded by Duong Luu/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 01:05 PM -----

	Trang Le
	11/07/2000 12:53 PM

		 To: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott
Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Elwood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Duong,
Per our phone conversation, below is the list of people that would need
access to EnPower production.

User Names:   NT ID:  Extension:
Scott Mills   SMills  x3-3548
Martha Stevens  MSteven x3-4742
Sarah Smith   SSmith  x3-0997
Juana Fayette  JFayett  x3-0992
Jana Morse  JMorse  x6-8265
Trang Le  TLe1  x3-6996

Currently, the Argentine Power group has in total about 20 physical forward
deals  which will be done under Enron Comercializadora De Energia Argentina
S.A.(Co. 027W) and one financial deal which will be done under Enron North
America (Co. 0364). Given the fact that we'll also have deals on ENA, I would
think that we could be on the Houston server. Just let us know.
In the mean time, we'll be working with the various Global groups to have the
proper desk, portfolio, facilities etc.... set up.

Thanks for your help,
Trang x3-6996


pls print.  thanks. df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/26/2001
03:52 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dan Fancler                           01/26/2001 10:34 AM

To: David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vernon Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Chandler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Drew Fossum@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON,
Lisa Sutton/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Debbie Moseley/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lee
Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Risk Management Caminus

David Port, ETS is purchasing a trading system from Caminus to track their
transactions.  Included in this system are position reports which the
Accounting Department will be using to report and determine compliance with
the attached policy and procedures, including open positions, VAR, MTM,
approval limits, Greeks, credit risk, stress testing, basis positions,
confirmations and invoicing.  The ETS Risk Management policy requires that
our reporting conform to the corporate standards, accordingly your name was
given to me as the person who could help direct some of the more technical
reporting standards.

Caminus is doing an introduction to their system today from 12:00 am to 3 pm
in 49c2, however I know you will not be back in town until next week.  Vernon
Mercaldo is coordinating the installation of the system and will be needing
your input relating to Corporate reporting standards.  As the project
progresses he will be contacting you.

Attached are drafts of the ETS Policy and Procedures.


FYI
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/28/2001 11:04 AM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	03/27/2001 08:53 PM

		 To: Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'"
<ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'" <andybrwn@earthlink.net>,
"'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante
(E-mail)'" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)"
<Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Tom Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Tom
Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'"
<alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<trusso@mcnallytemple.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Initiative Campaign Strategy Outline

The following memo is for discussion during our Wednesday public affairs
committee meeting.
Thanks!  Jean

March 26, 2001

MEMORANDUM

To:    IEP
Fr:     Ray McNally, Richard Temple, Tony Russo, Jean Munoz, Tom Ross
Re:   Initiative Campaign Strategy Outline

Harvey Rosenfield has on numerous occasions threatened to place an initiative
on the 2002 ballot to re-regulate the power industry.

It is not a hollow threat.

Not only has Rosenfield successfully placed initiatives on the ballot in the
past, but the current energy crisis has become the number one issue on the
minds of voters dd making it easier to qualify a ballot measure.  And our own
internal polling for IEP shows voters would initially support the concept of
re-regulating the industry.

However, qualifying an initiative for next year?s election is not a foregone
conclusion.  And passing one is an even more difficult task.

Rosenfield faces several roadblocks:

o    The current energy issue is complicated, and all potential solutions
have weaknesses that could be exploited in a political campaign.

o    IEP?s internal polling shows Rosenfield?s proposal has weaknesses that
could be exploited dd including the price tag and the image of a state-run
energy department that could be compared to the DMV and CalTrans.

o    Rosenfield would have a difficult time funding a campaign, especially
raising the resources to overcome a strong, well funded "no" campaign.

o    The burden of "proof" always falls on the "yes" campaign rather than the
"no" campaign.  Voters are concerned about giving their approval to changes
that could make things worse.  Rosenfield will have to prove his case beyond
a shadow of a doubt, and therefore it is easier to defeat an initiative than
it is to pass one.

o    If power generators become motivated they can be a formidable opponent.

Following is (1) a preliminary timeline Rosenfield would face in trying to
qualify an initiative for the ballot in 2002, (2) strategic concepts that
should be considered before pursuing a plan to defeat the initiative, (3)
preliminary strategic and tactical options in opposing the initiative, and
(4) a discussion of campaign costs.

We recommend using this outline as a starting point to develop an effective
campaign plan that could successfully defeat Rosenfield if he pursues an
initiative strategy.

Timeline

To date, no proposed ballot initiative has been submitted to the Attorney
General for title and summary.  Accordingly, there is not sufficient time
available to qualify an initiative for the March 2002 ballot.

However, there is still adequate time to qualify a measure for the November
2002 ballot.  We believe Rosenfield could submit a measure to the Attorney
General as late as September, 2001 and still qualify the initiative for the
November 2002 ballot dd especially if the summer months produce power
blackouts, skyrocketing energy bills, and the image of a bungling Governor,
legislature and regulators.

The following timeline would allow Rosenfield to submit language for title
and summary as late as September 28, 2001 and qualify the initiative for the
November 2002 ballot:

September 28, 2001

Proposed measure is submitted to the AG for title and summary.

November 20, 2001

Attorney General prepares and issues title and summary.  Proponent can begin
circulating petitions.

April 19, 2002

The proponent files the petitions with county elections officials.

May 1, 2002

County elections officials complete petition raw count totals and certify raw
numbers to the Secretary of State.

June 23, 2002

County elections officials verify and certify results of the number of valid
signatures in their counties and turn in counts to the Secretary of State.

June 27, 2002

Secretary of State determines if the initiative qualifies for the ballot.
Proponent needs 670,816 valid signatures to qualify a constitutional
amendment or 419,260 valid signatures to qualify a straight statute.

Strategic Concepts

There are several strategic concepts that should be reviewed:

o    While satisfying Rosenfield may be impossible, IEP could push hard to
ensure a "solution" is passed by the legislature to give credibility to the
criticism that Rosenfield is an extremist whose initiative could undercut the
legislative remedy.

o    The industry could organize a well-funded campaign that contains an
early advertising blitz to quickly define the ballot measure in the most
negative manner possible, and that delivers a knock out punch in October.

o    Generators could promote a counter-initiative proposal, either through
the legislature or qualified by petition dd stopping Rosenfield?s proposal if
more "yes" votes are received for the counter initiative than the Rosenfield
measure.

o    Paid signature gathering firms could be put on contract for
industry-related business dd thus keeping these firms off the table for
Rosenfield.  Another variation would be to hire firms to gather signatures
calling for legislative action dd thus gaining names of voters who support
our position, but also keeping signature gatherers too busy to help
Rosenfileld.

o    The industry could pay to gather signatures on petitions that removes
names of people who may have signed the petition for Rosenfield?s
initiative.  This could cut down the number of valid signatures accepted by
county election officials.

o    A paid advertising campaign could be run during the proposal?s signature
gathering phase urging voters not to sign the petitions.  An added benefit of
the concept is defining the proposal early if it still qualifies for the
ballot.

o    We could organize a legal assault on the proposal dd stopping their
signature gathering efforts or keeping it off the ballot.

Campaign Strategy

If the proposal qualifies for the ballot, the industry must pursue an
aggressive strategy to defeat the measure.  We need to identify weaknesses in
the proposal and share those weaknesses with voters.  We must also push
voters to question the motives behind the initiative.  We need to make sure
voters are uncomfortable with all or portions of the initiative to ensure
they vote no despite wanting adequate and affordable energy.

The campaign should conduct thorough research to determine the best strategy
to defeat the measure.  Initially we believe the "no" campaign should focus
on testing and developing the following messages:

o    The measure will hurt taxpayers.  A $40 billion price tag is too much
for voters to accept as the only solution to the problem.

o    The proposal will hurt public services.  The cost of Rosenfield?s
measure will keep money away from more important programs  dd like schools,
public safety and programs for children and seniors.

o    The ballot measure is simply a way for elected officials to get more tax
dollars to cover up their failures dd and they should not be rewarded with
public support.

o    Rosenfield?s proposal will result in higher taxes to pay for more
bureaucracy and wasted tax dollars.

o    The proposal will result in more inefficient government that will
produce unreliable power dd hurting consumers, and vital services such as
hospitals and public safety.

o    The measure will hurt the economy and cost jobs at a time when the
economy is hurting.

Campaign Tactics

The campaign should follow an aggressive battleplan that includes the
following components:

Research

Focus groups and quantitative surveys should be conducted to help craft the
best messages to attack the proposal.  This research would also be important
in efforts to secure the most favorable ballot title and summary possible to
our goal of defeating it.

Demographic and election research should also be conducted to determine
voters most open to our campaign messages.  We should also conduct thorough
research on Rosenfield to expose his true motivations for proposing this
measure and its inherent weaknesses.

Legal, Title & Summary, and Ballot Argument Challenges

We should pursue every possible legal option to either get the proposal off
the ballot, or ensure the most favorable title & summary and weakened ballot
arguments for the initiative sponsors.  Our experience shows that the ballot
title and summary can swing initial vote margins either way by as much as 10
points.

Paid Advertising

Statewide campaigns in California require paid advertising dd including
electronic media, direct mail, and telemarketing.  Advertising should be
carefully targeted to ensure the most "bang for the buck."

Earned Media

Editorial support is an important part of successful statewide campaigns, as
is ensuring favorable media coverage of the campaign.  A focused earned media
campaign would greatly enhance the chances for success and editorial support
and Op-Ed?s can provide important third party credibility to the no campaign.

Coalition Building

It will be critical for the industry to gain credible allies in its fight
against Rosenfield.  We do not want the campaign to be portrayed as
generators versus consumer groups.  Therefore, we need credible, third party
groups standing along side us to broaden our appeal and message, like
taxpayer groups, business leaders, consumer organizations, energy experts,
economists, educators, law enforcement and seniors.

Campaign Costs

How much will be needed to defeat Rosenfield will depend on several factors.
Depending on several variables, the cost of a "no" campaign can range from a
few million dollars to as much as the $40 million spent to defeat Proposition
9.

Campaign costs to defeat ballot measures are contingent upon several
variables:

o    The popularity of the measure with voters.  The more they like it on the
natural, the more expensive it will be to defeat the measure.

o    How much money Rosenfield can raise to promote the measure.  If he has
few resources, the "no" campaign will have an uncontested paid advertising
campaign, which will make defeating the proposal much easier.

o    How bad the energy crisis impacts voters.  If the next 15 months produce
an on-going crisis, campaign costs will rise.

o    The effectiveness of messages against the proposal.  If focus group and
survey research confirm the proposal has an Achilles heel, the cost to defeat
the measure will go down dramatically.

Thorough research of Rosenfield?s actual proposal will better enable us to
recommend a campaign plan, message and budget.  In summary, defeating the
Rosenfield initiative will cost from a few to several million dollars and a
united industry effort.


You betcha,  I get off around 5:30-5:45 where were you thinking.


John, I can cover that time frame.  I will call you around 3:30 or just drop by if its okay with you.

Ravi Thuraisingham, CFA
Director, Storage Trading
Enron Broadband Services
p  713.853.3057
c  713.516.5440
pg 877.680.4806
ravi.thuraisingham@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, John
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 5:58 PM
To:	Thuraisingham, Ravi
Subject:	RE: Neural Networks

Any time tomorrow afternoon around 3 or 4:45 to discuss?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thuraisingham, Ravi
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:29 PM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	RE: Neural Networks

John, here is a power point slide that provides a draft outline of the problem at hand.  It is very draft in nature but I wanted to get the working version over to you ASAP.  I wanted to get this discussion going via written format so that I (or others who may implement this) can stay focused on what you want and not get into broader research, etc....

I think I can put a model together if we can define what parameters, the interface (levers) and model (transfer functions) to use that would be useful for you as phase I product.

I will fire off updates to this document as I make them.  If you have a spec doc or ideas that you want to hand write on a print out, please do so and I will update the document.

I will like to make sure that I am on the same page before beginning to code the program and to start linking to additional moths (month 2, 3, ..) and different curves, etc.

My Job search has gone well with the Crude desk and I am waiting compensation indication from them to make my decision. Also, Kevin Presto feels that I could potentially help his power group with new market or spread trading.  John Suarez is a director who came from the power desk to EBS is going back to work for Kevin Presto.  I may have an opportunity to build the southeast market by supporting John.

I am very grateful that I met you and other key Enron traders during this job search.

 << File: Neural Ideas.ppt >>

Ravi Thuraisingham, CFA
Director, Storage Trading
Enron Broadband Services
p  713.853.3057
c  713.516.5440
pg 877.680.4806
ravi.thuraisingham@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, John
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 3:47 PM
To:	Thuraisingham, Ravi
Subject:	RE: Neural Networks

not necessarily looking for predictive power.  that's a 3 year project.  just for market making skillset.  The work that Dave Forster did was just for front month.  That creates month 1.  Then, similar logic has to create a month 1/month 2 spread to create a month 2 outright market.   Same for month 2/ month 3 to create month 3.  There might be 24-36 individual markets to create a forward curve.  Sometimes month 1 has correlation to the month 1/ month 2 spread.  Sometimes it does not.  Must create a system that is mechanical but very easy for a human to add bias.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thuraisingham, Ravi
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	Neural Networks

John, I just wanted to give you heads up that I did look into the subject system to learn from what your trading activities and then figure ways to automate some aspects of you daily activities.  I will try to send you a few power point slides showing my initial thoughts on the system.

It appears that neutral network (AI is a subset of this class of learning systems) type of model that takes input from all available sources (including actual market feedback, weather and other fundamentals) and uses curve building functions and other existing tools as transfer functions, along with your own thinking (your processing functions that your neurons are wired up to do), could help the neural network to learn and eventually provide the necessary predictive power.

Ravi Thuraisingham, CFA
Director, Storage Trading
Enron Broadband Services
p  713.853.3057
c  713.516.5440
pg 877.680.4806
ravi.thuraisingham@enron.com


looks ok to me

	Karen Denne
	03/13/2001 11:54 AM

		 To: Mark Metts/Enron@EnronXGate, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Revised Merger Release & Q&A

fyi...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 03/13/2001
11:53 AM ---------------------------
From: Diane Bazelides@AZURIX on 03/13/2001 11:45 AM
To: Elizabeth Ivers/NA/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Revised Merger Release & Q&A

Here are the latest documents.  We plan to issue the release immediately
after the meeting, which is scheduled to begin at 10 on Friday and probably
lasting less than 30 minutes.


Just a little heads up. It is going to be so cold in Omaha next week.  Will
probably hit around Tuesday.  Expect highs below zero.for about a week..
Better get your chores done this week because you are not going to want to go
outside next week..  Haven't seen it this cold since 1983.. Will encompass
the entire country.  Gas prices going through the roof.


Hi Shirley &  Vince:

 Happy New Year! I am in our Bombay offices for a couple of days, so am able
to contact you. For some reason, the modem dialup from my computer hasn't
been working. Hope everything is going well in Houston. Anitha & I have  good
news. We are having our second baby. It was confirmed after we came to India.

Shirley, I have a favor to ask you on this matter. Can you make an
appointment for Anitha with her doctor? The details are as follows:

Dr.  Dolar Patolia
Tel:  713-756-5500
Name:  Anitha Kakani
Dates:  Jan 29th or 31st.
Times:  In order of preferance, after 3PM, 12-3PM, 10AM-12Noon.
Reason: Pregnant with due date of Aug 8th. Needs a full checkup.

Anitha is having severe nausea, so she is taking rest most of the time.
Pallavi and I are enjoing our vacation thoroughly.

Thanks and best wishes,
Krishna.
Ph. 011-91-40-7114833

PS: Please count Jan 16th & 17th as working days for me.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	INVITATION

Description:
	meet w/ Lloyd & Tom & Andrea re: Services  kevin's office

Date:		4/12/2001
Time:		2:00 PM - 3:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Hello Guillermo. I reviewed the letter and I'm thinking that the Re: explains what the subject matter is.  There is no need to reiterate why we are writing this letter.  What we might want to have in the first paragraph is our history of business that we do with them.  In the past, this is what we've done and this is what's been required on your end.  We've reviewed your tariff and others.

Second paragraph should entail Our question and/or issue is - what the reasoning or justification for the requirement.

I guess the reason I haven't went any further with the letter is that we need answers internally from EES for the first paragraph and of course reviews of the tariffs (which I'm working on).

By the way, I have made contact with someone at EES for the website but the problem is that it's on EES' website and we're not set up to see what they have.  I'm working with Kathy, our IT person to see if we can get set up.

Melinda

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Canovas, Guillermo
Sent:	Wednesday, October  17, 2001 4:20 PM
To:	Pharms, Melinda
Subject:	FW: Letter

Here is Jewel version

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Angela
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:10 PM
To:	Canovas, Guillermo
Subject:	RE: Letter

See what you think of this effort....
 << File: Transportation Mix Ltr.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Canovas, Guillermo
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:54 AM
To:	Wilson, Angela
Subject:	Letter

I would appreciate if you correct the mistakes I made in hte letter below. (formal/gramar/prepositions/etc)
Try to make it look as a letter from Enron to an LDC.
Thanks.
Guille

 << File: n-mix.doc >>


See attached summary of 1/8 meeting with Dennis Thompson, Don Hollingsworth's
Special Projects Director.


MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee-Board and Associate Members Only
       Power Marketers Working Group

FROM: Joe Hartsoe, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Bob Reilley, Power Marketers Working Group Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy
            Mark Bennett, Senior Manager of Policy
            Erin Perrigo, Manager of Policy

DATE: March 16, 2001

RE: Regulatory Affairs Washington Staff
      ? First Meeting Scheduled for Thursday, March 29th at
        Noon

Members have asked that EPSA begin coordinating regular meetings for the
regulatory staff of our member companies here in Washington, D.C.  Like we do
for the legislative affairs staff, EPSA would plan twice-a-month informal
meetings to provide opportunities to share information and discuss strategy
and tactics.  The group will not develop EPSA policy.

The first meeting of the group will be held at the new EPSA office on
Thursday, March 29th at noon.  Lunch will be provided.  The office is located
at 1401 New York Ave., N.W., 11th floor.  The agenda will include
organizational issues, including future meeting format and schedules.

If you are planning to attend, please RSVP using the form below to Jackie
Gallagher either by fax (202-628-8260) or e-mail (jgallagher@epsa.org).

Regulatory Affairs Washington Staff

_____  Yes, I will attend the March 29th meeting

_____  No, I will not be able to attend.

Name:______________________ Company:_______________________

Phone: __________________  E-mail:____________________________


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2000 08:51
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           01/24/2000 08:20 AM

To: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES Booking of Transport--annuities to desk

I'd like to set up a meeting with the two of you (and whoever else you think
needs to be there) to go over the booking of various deals.  For example,
Dayton P&L--we pay out to them a big demand charge each month, but the desk
should be getting an annuity payment back.  Where will they see this in their
p&l?
CALP is another example.  Are you two available Tuesday around 12:00 to
discuss?

I will make sure someone from the East Desk is there as well.  If there are
any in the Central Region that are like this, let me know and I'll round up
someone from that desk, too (unless you think they already know how theirs is
working).

Thanks.


Your message

  To:      cttng@pdq.net; Alicia.Goodrow@enron.com; henryg@shellus.com;
ah692217@bcm.tmc.edu; rayberyl.mack@worldnet.att.net
  Subject: May 19 Church Gourmet Cajun Dinner
  Sent:    Wed, 9 May 2001 18:31:55 -0500

did not reach the following recipient(s):

henryg@shell.com on Wed, 9 May 2001 18:34:16 -0500
    The recipient name is not recognized
 The MTS-ID of the original message is:
c=us;a=attmail;p=shellusa;l=ICSSCXH70105092334KDJ22905
    MSEXCH:IMS:SHELL:MSXSSC:ICSSCXH7 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient

-----
Message-ID: <OFF08CD23A.FDCC2894-ON86256A47.007E2F3A@enron.com>
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com
To: cttng@pdq.net, Alicia.Goodrow@enron.com, henryg@shellus.com,
 ah692217@bcm.tmc.edu, rayberyl.mack@worldnet.att.net
Subject: May 19 Church Gourmet Cajun Dinner
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 18:31:55 -0500
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:

I look forward to having you all as guests for an evening of Cajun cooking
at my home on Saturday, May 19 at 7:00 pm.  Some of us (I won't name
names!) are hoping we might even have enough time to play a wicked game of
African Uno!

Below is the list of the individuals attending the dinner at my home, and
attached below are the recipes for the evening.  I will provide beer, wine
and soft drinks.  In addition, I will make a big pot of white rice to go
with the Red Beans & Rice, & Shrimp Etouffe.

Please let me know as soon as possible which recipe you would prefer to
prepare.

Laura Johnson (1)
Charles and Janice Thompson (2)
John Hagood (1)
Ann Hutson (1)
Henry and Alicia Goodrow (2)
Beryl and Ray Mack (2)
Tana Jones (1)

The directions to my house are as follows:

1.  Take 59 to the Greenbriar exit (like you are going to Church)
2.  Make a right on Greenbriar
3.  Quickly get into the left lane because you will have to make the first
left possible onto a street called Milford
4.  Then, make a left onto Shepherd (you need to go back one street in the
opposite direction)
5.  The first right will be Banks Street (it is the street right next to
the 59 freeway)
6.  On Banks, go past the first stop sign, I will be the 3 or 4th house on
the left, a taupe colored, ivy covered cottage, 1920 Banks
7.  My phone number is (713) 529-1038

(See attached file: Church Gourmet 51901.doc)

 - Church Gourmet 51901.doc


GIFT CERTIFICATES TO THE RESCUE!
Plus Great Items at Great Prices!

Still unable to find the gift that you want? Count on Gift Certificates
from Cooking.com. Purchase as late as the 24th if you wish. They're sent
via email  within hours of your order, arriving before Christmas morning
and are available in denominations from $10 to $500. The easiest and
fastest way to wish  someone a happy holiday!
http://www.cooking.com/bin/a.asp?a=nwsl2122c&s=b00133302t1

Ghirardelli Chocolate Gift Basket - Special $34.99 (Reg. $49.95)
Full of gourmet chocolates and candies, this Ghirardelli Gift Basket is
the perfect hostess gift. Contains ten different chocolate goodies.
http://www.cooking.com/bin/a.asp?a=nwsl2122b&s=b00133302t1

CLEARANCE UP TO 50% OFF!

Bargains, savings and super low prices! We've tossed in everything but the
kitchen sink! Shop our Clearance Department for the best year-end deals.
Choose  from gourmet foods, brand-name cookware and bakeware, and
specialty electrics. Make your selections now - stock is limited, prices
are low so they won't be  here long!
http://www.cooking.com/bin/a.asp?a=nwsl2122d&s=b00133302t1

15% OFF BAKEWARE, SPECIALTY FOODS AND COOK'S TOOLS!

Save 15% in these shops when your order totals $50 or more. To receive
your savings, enter Coupon Code C82823 at checkout. Click here for
details.
http://www.cooking.com/bin/a.asp?a=nwsl2122f&s=b00133302t1

* Excludes All-Clad, Weekly Specials and Clearance items. Offer ends
12/31/01. Cannot be applied to previous purchases or combined with other
offer codes.

Searching for more item? Look no further than Cooking.com!
http://www.cooking.com/bin/a.asp?a=nwsl2122h&s=b00133302t1

To unsubscribe, click here:
http://www.cooking.com/bin/a.asp?a=nwsl2122g&s=b00133302t1&email=kholst@ect.enron.com
Please note that you're subscribed as: kholst@ect.enron.com


Apologies.  My dead just fell into a million pieces.  I won't have a chance
to review Jimmie's fine work (nice name for the CFO, by the way), and I've
just been informed that I'll need to have dinner with our bankruptcy guy this
evening (turns out we're on the unsecured creditor committee for PG&E's
banckruptcy).  So I won't be able to be in class tonite.  Again apologies.
Great job Jimmie, particularly in light of the Easter holiday.

Best,
Jeff


It looks like things are moving forward on the Intergen/CA deal.  If we can
verify the status of the wires we will want to give notice today.  Fred Mitro
is working on this and will give you a call to up date the status.

I have not seen the final numbers to plug into the notices.  Is this
information available?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/10/2001 02:41
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/10/2001 02:34:22 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "'ben.f.jacoby@enron.com'" <ben.f.jacoby@enron.com>,
"'f_mitro@hotmail.com'" <f_mitro@hotmail.com>, "Keffer, John"
<JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Notice of Approval of Facility Agreements / Escrow Status

Kay:

We have received by fax a new letter from SEL to ENA advising that all three
Facility Agreements delivered under ENA's January 8, 2001 letter are
acceptable to SEL, subject to the addition of Exhibit H-2 training materials
(omitted from the electronic version of the facility agreements) identical
to that inserted in the forms attached as exhibits to the turbine letter
agreements.  I will have copies of Exhibit H-2 made and inserted as
appropriate.

The notice letter resolves all of the issues presented by the letter
previously tendered.  This new letter dated January 9, 2001 establishes
today, January 10, as the deadline for SEL funding the escrow, and Thursday,
January 18, 2001 (due to bank holiday on the 15th) as the closing date.

Fred just reported that Lari Paradee has advised that the three wire
transfers funding the escrows have been sent and that Citibank has confirmed
to her that the two $16.1 million wires have been received, with
confirmation on the transformer wire still pending.  She is to circulate
confirmation numbers as soon as available.  Enron may wish to independently
verify funding.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
 <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com> ccampbell@kslaw.com

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


BLOOMBERG
Are you talking about the broker fee?
Yes the fee is $15.00 Flat per Bloomberg's confirmation on both of these
deals.

PREBON
Bob said Matt Motley gave him this deal to do. Is that going to fly with
Prebon?
I guess this is o.k. but they were insisting that this deal was done with
Matt not Bob.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                04/16/2001 04:04 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 4/16 Checkout

BLOOMBERG
Are you talking about the broker fee?

TRADESPARK
Matt's contact is verifying this trade as off-peak.

AMEREX
Chris just changed deal 582853 from APB to Amerex

582894 - changed to 47.75

PREBON
Bob said Matt Motley gave him this deal to do. Is that going to fly with
Prebon?

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/16/2001 01:55 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 4/16 Checkout

BLOOMBERG

deal 582589 and 582423
Bloomberg shows fee as $15.00 flat on both of these deals.

TRADESPARK

Matt Motley
deal 582856
Tradespark shows hours as on-peak not off-peak

AMEREX

Chris Mallory
I am missing:
Enron sells to Duke 4/20-4/30 NP-15 Light 25 mw at $190

Mike Swerzbin
deal 582894
Amerex says price should be $47.75 not $47.25

PREBON

Bob Badeer
deal 582668
Prebon says this deal should be Matt Motley's


I will be on vacation Friday Oct. 19.  I can be reached at home if anyone needs something.

DS


chk email re: Dunn info from Hedy.  Jeff


this is the b.s. I've been dealing with all night.  they're still planning on a before market release.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Deborah.Fiorito@dynegy.com [mailto:Deborah.Fiorito@dynegy.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:53 AM
To: steve lipin; mpalmer@enron.com
Subject: Final release

Mark and Steve,

Attached is the latest approved release from us.  While I understand that
the banks may have an issue with Dynegy's view on the equity infusion as
the headline; for us, it's critical.  Affirming what we've already
committed to day in and day out (including over the weekend, is a
non-event.

For our part, Chuck still needs to sign off after you've run this by the
banks.  If all goes well, we'll get this out as early as possible before
market open.

Debbie
(713)224-1877--home
(713)254-3071--Cell
(713)767-6018--office


We have received an executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   December 20, 2000

Enron Entity:   Risk Management & Trading Corp.

Counterparty:   ENA Upstream Company, LLC

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products with the exception of:
Foreign Exchange

Confirming Entity:  Risk Management & Trading Corp.

Governing Law:   Texas

Copies will be distributed

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com


I'm supposed to get their comments today, I thought there was a section on
margining in the draft I sent them.  Let me investigate and I'll let you
know.  Also, there are some seriuos legal questions regarding their authority
to do a pure financial transaction.  I'll keep you up to date on this too.

Jason R Williams@ENRON
01/25/2001 07:50 AM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Fuller/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: ISDA Worksheet: Public Utility District of Clark County, Washington

Tana -

Attached is the ISDA worksheet for Clark County, Washington.  You will note
that this worksheet indicates no collateral threshold, as Clark County is a
counterparty that will require a contract where we maintain no collateral
rights.  NOTE TO TRACY AND DAVE:  If you feel like we can get Clark County
PUD to agree to margin rights, then we should (obviously) try to put a draft
in front of them with a threshold and margin rights.  Please let me know your
thoughts on this issue.

Thanks,

Jay


I guess this is good news unless they introduce the "next steps" section at
the meeting with a slide that is titled "Step One:  Shutting Your Sorry-Ass
Pipeline Down ONce and For All" .   Seriously, the agenda doesn't seem to
have any flavor of escalation, which is great given the  lack of attractive
alternatives for our team right now.  Talk to you about this tomorrow.  DF

07/05/2000 04:10 PM
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
07/05/2000 04:10 PM
07/05/2000 04:10 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RE: Proposed meeting in Flagstaff

Guys - just fyi.   Ignore the notes and see the agenda.  nothing surp[rising
so far..
---------------------- Forwarded by Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron on 07/05/2000
04:10 PM ---------------------------

"Boschee, Rodney" <RAB9@pge.com> on 07/03/2000 02:16:27 PM
To: Michel.Nelson@enron.com, Earl.Chanley@enron.com,
Larry.Campbell@enron.com, Ray.Smith@enron.com, Louis.Soldano@enron.com,
David.Roensch@enron.com, John.Shafer@enron.com, "'Rich.Jolly@enron.com'"
<Rich.Jolly@enron.com>
cc: "Anderson, David W (Law)" <DWA3@pge.com>

Subject: RE: Proposed meeting in Flagstaff

Rich,
Attached is a draft agenda for our July 13 meeting.
Most of us will be staying the night of 7/12 at the Holiday Inn in
Flagstaff.  Your directions look pretty clear but if you could send me via
e-mail or fax (415-973-6112) a map that would help keep us from getting
lost.

thanks,
 <<twpcb41.doc>>

rod

> ----------
> From:  Rich.Jolly@enron.com[SMTP:Rich.Jolly@enron.com]
> Sent:  Monday, July 03, 2000 5:55 AM
> To:  Boschee, Rodney; Michel.Nelson@enron.com; Earl.Chanley@enron.com;
> Larry.Campbell@enron.com; Ray.Smith@enron.com; Louis.Soldano@enron.com;
> David.Roensch@enron.com; John.Shafer@enron.com
> Subject:  RE: Proposed meeting in Flagstaff
>
> Rod we didn't have any luck finding a meeting room or motel rooms in
> Flagstaff. It's seems like everyone in the state is meeting there next
> week. We'll need to meet at our Flagstaff Compressor Station which is
> about
> 18 miles West of Flagstaff on 1-40. The road to our station is named
> Transwestern leading off the interstate. After exiting turn left and
> follow the access road  which is paved 6 miles around to the station. Let
> me know if you fly in that morning and we'll pick you up or what ever will
> work for you. I'll probably stay in Winslow which is about 50 miles East
> of
> Flagstaff, but will be in Flagstaff early on the 13th.
>
> The start time for the meeting might change because of this, but I'll wait
> to hear from you and we'll work something out..
>
> Thanks Rich
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron on 07/03/2000
> 06:09 AM ---------------------------
>
>
> Rich Jolly on 06/26/2000 08:52:51 PM
>
> To:   "Boschee, Rodney" <RAB9@pge.com>
> cc:
>
> Subject:  RE: Proposed meeting in Flagstaff  (Document link: Rich Jolly)
>
> Rod
> Thanks and I look forward to hearing from you. I'll send you some things
> we
> want to talk about. I'm sure they are similar to yours.
> Have a good week.
> Rich
>
>
>
> "Boschee, Rodney" <RAB9@pge.com> on 06/26/2000 05:53:36 PM
>
> To:   "'Rich.Jolly@enron.com'" <Rich.Jolly@enron.com>
> cc:
>
> Subject:  RE: Proposed meeting in Flagstaff
>
>
> Rich,
> Thanks for the quick turn-around.  8:00 am start sounds good.  I will talk
> with Dave (our attorney) regard he and Lou making the trip.
> I will put together agenda items and send off to you early next week.  I
> will also advise you of our plans.
> Thanks,
>
> rod
>
> > ----------
> > From:   Rich.Jolly@enron.com[SMTP:Rich.Jolly@enron.com]
> > Sent:   Monday, June 26, 2000 3:42 PM
> > To:     Boschee, Rodney
> > Subject:     Re: Proposed meeting in Flagstaff
> >
> >
> > Rod good to hear from you. TW should have about the same number of
> people
> > attending. Like you we will invite our attorney's and  see what they
> say.
> > If 08:00 for a start time will work for you we'll plan on it. I'll need
> > your help on items to be discussed. If you would like for me to get
> > reservations for you let me know. We'll plan to have the meeting at
> Little
> > America, which is a good palace to stay also.
> >
> > I plan to be in Flagstaff sometime the 12th. I'll be driving from
> Durango,
> > Colo. so I'm not sure of the time. I'll be on vacation the rest of this
> > week but will have my computer and  will be checking phone mail. Thanks
> > and
> > I'm looking forward to the meeting.
> >
> > Rich
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Boschee, Rodney" <RAB9@pge.com> on 06/26/2000 03:12:50 PM
> >
> > To:   "'rjolly@enron.com'" <rjolly@enron.com>
> > cc:
> >
> > Subject:  Proposed meeting in Flagstaff
> >
> >
> > I understand you will be coordinating the meeting we scheduled for July
> 13
> > in Flagstaff.  I anticipate PG&E will have about 7 individuals
> attending,
> > depending if we invite our attorneys.
> >
> > I would suggest we get started early in the morning of the 13.  We will
> be
> > arriving the night before so an early start will allow us greater
> > flexibility on getting home that afternoon.  I am in the process of
> > reviewing our alternatives for getting in and out of Flagstaff.
> >
> > Let me know what your tentative plans our.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Rod Boschee
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>

 - twpcb41.doc


I don't know who started the initialling kick, and I don't know if I care if
it continues.  I don't know if Lee cares.  It is probably an EECC artifact.
If GE doesn't care, then I don't care.  ( I hear strains of a show tune "I
don't care, I don't care").

I think I've lost my mind.

Kay

Dale Rasmussen@ECT
03/06/2001 06:18 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: LV Co Gen - the next generation... (hey, is that a pun?)

This is step 2 in an ongoing mystery.

When I got the files from Peter there were no initial lines for the
contract.  I was surprised, but presumed that this was no longer a
requirement.

Bill Williams has said he is prepared to initial whatever we put in front of
him.  If we do the new form, we would have to redo the pages anyway (I
presume).  If we take that course and I get the electronic version up here, I
will ask Bill to sign on.

Engage, Mr. Data.

Kay Mann@ENRON
03/06/2001 04:05 PM
To: Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: LV Co Gen - the next generation... (hey, is that a pun?)

Dale,

Has GE initialled all the pages of the break out contract?  If so, it would
be very helpful if you could ship me the originals.  That way, we only have
to change the names, which will make it easier for Lee when we have to ask
him to sign.  Also, has someone from the Enron side initialled all the
pages?  That helps, too!

Kay


For your information--

Eric Thode, the Director of Public Relations for Enron, sent the email below
to let us know that after a lot of discussion with the legal department, the
decision was made to retain our company name of Enron North America, while
the offices of Dave Delainey and John Lavorato will use Enron Americas.  Eric
suggested that if we have ordered any business cards or stationery with Enron
Americas that we re-order and use Enron North America.

Let me know if you have any questions.

---------------------- Forwarded by Debra Davidson/PDX/ECT on 12/18/2000
07:35 AM ---------------------------

Eric Thode@ENRON
12/18/2000 06:48 AM
To: Debra Davidson/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Letterhead and Business Cards

Debra --

Stop the presses....I just received new information regarding the name
change.  We have decided to keep everyone as Enron NOrth America or Enron
South America.  The only people who will use Enron Americas are Dave Delainey
and John Lavorato.  Hope this does not cause a problem.  If it does, please
call me to discuss.  I'm sorry for the incorrect information a week or so ago.

Eric


If you find any fundamental problems with this model let me know.


26th - I'm not sure Steve will be back from an offsite.

Steve is open March 27th and 28th.

He will probably be out of town on the 29th and 30th.

  Maureen

	Lexi Elliott
	03/05/2001 03:07 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Courtney/HOU/EES@EES, Brad
Alford/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Zarsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jacqueline
Coleman/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject:

I need to schedule a cultivation dinner for our 3 Rice summer intern
candidates and would like for Steve, Mark, or Brad to attend, if at all
possible.

Please let me know if and when you would be available March 26-30 for  dinner
.  The candidates' accept deadline is April 4.

Thank you!

lexi
3-4585


I plan to continue my normal schedule of working 6am to 4pm which coincides with noramal Houston hours, covers spot gas trading, covers spot power trading and overlaps with most of my customers hours in the west.  When necessary I will come in early or stay late.  Please let me know if there are any issues there.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presas, Jessica
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:31 AM
To:	Bronstein, Mara; Felling, Amy; Fuller, Dave; Harrison, Tyrell; Lucci, Paul T.; Miller, Stephanie; Polsky, Phil; Staab, Theresa; Ward, Kim S (Houston); Whitt, Mark
Cc:	DuBose, Heidi
Subject:	FW: Work Hours

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:02 AM
To:	Presas, Jessica
Subject:	FW: Work Hours

Please circulate to west gas Orig group.

Thanks. BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 6:46 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Gay, Randall L.; Heu, Mog; Holst, Keith; Huang, Jason; Kuykendall, Tori; Lenhart, Matthew; Lisk, Daniel; Reitmeyer, Jay; Sanchez, Monique; Scott, Susan M.; Smith, Matt; South, Steven P.; Sullivan, Patti; Tholt, Jane M.; Tycholiz, Barry; Wolfe, Jason
Subject:	Work Hours

Dear West,

We talked briefly on Monday about our commitment to a full work day at Enron.  If you are in the office, then please be prepared to contribute to the group for a full day.  Our schedule now calls for critical communication in the afternoons.  We need to know that each employee will be here every day to create the consistency needed to outperform the rest of the market.

We want to remain as flexible as possible with all traders when it comes to an emergency, but remember that you have a commitment to Enron to contribute a full work day.

Please organize your vacation on the west desk calendar with Ina and coordinate any early afternoon departures with Ina and myself.  Also, prepare to have your markets covered when you leave the office early.

Sincerely,

Mike


My contact there is John Porter.  His email is:  japorter@tva.gov.  I will
send you the rest of the info as I receive it.  Thanks for your help.

-Joe


If you have not yet volunteered, we still need people and would really appreciate your help.  Below is some information about the project we will be working on.  I will send more details to the definite volunteers.

If we can't have your time, we would still like to borrow your tools.  Also, we are collecting food and baked goods to take to this man, who's only food is from Meals on Wheels (healthy stuff).

I look forward to your responses letting me know how you'll be able to help.  If you have questions, please call me at 3-0322.
Beth

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Phillips, Rebecca
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 11:20 AM
To:	Patterson, Jessie; Miertschin, Beth
Subject:	Day of Caring - 5719 Ettrick, Aug 8, 2001

Below is information about the house you will be volunteering at on Wednesday, August 8th.  Please send me a list of all the AA volunteers, as well as the ones who will be staying all day.

This house is in need of outside repairs.  Mr. Elvin Rayes is an older man and lives there alone.  He is a veteran and is very proud and doesn't want to accept charity.  However, he is going to let us help him with the outside.  He was very nice when I met him on Sunday and I told him that all the people coming over to help were excited they didn't have to go to work for the day.  This made it seem like we were doing more of a favor for ourselves versus for him.  He liked that.  This house really needs a lot of TLC

I would suggest everyone wear old clothes they don't mind painting in and their GREEN United Way t-shirts (shorts are fine but jeans may be better for those who want to mow - this is Houston and it's summer).  Below is a safety note one site leader sent out to his team.  You may want to forward this to your AA volunteers.

Safety First!!!

Let's make sure we are all safe. We all want to go home just like we get there - no injuries!!
A few safety rules:

If you see someone working unsafe - either tell them, or tell me immediately (so I can tell them)!
Plan your work, and discuss it with your work crew.
Don't hurry, use common sense.
Use the right tool for the job
Be careful lifting, lift with your legs, not your back.  If item is heavy or bulky, get help! - Don't be macho.
Be sure to wear safety glass or goggles when appropriate (weed eating, power saws, grass mowing, etc).
Wear work gloves
Make sure ladders are secure, and either tied down or someone stabilizing the base.
Be aware of people around you and what they are doing.

Tasks

Here are the main tasks at the Ettrick house.  Once everyone gets out there, we can shift the work according to everyone's preference as long as the work gets done.  People may work on more than one task depending on progress, congestion, and what people would like to do.

Replace rotten outside trim boards
Replace garage door (rotten on bottom)
Trim trees with chainsaw - especially in the back yard
Replace soffit screening
Clean bathroom - 2 people
Yard work - trim hedges, mow and edge
Replace screen door
Caulk around the windows
Scrape old paint and paint outside
Replace window screens
Replace doorbell

Tools

Here is the list of tools.  Bring what you have and make sure to put your name on it with a permanent marker.  Please let me know if you are missing any tools and I will do my best to get them there.  It may be good for people that have tool boxes just to bring them if they can.  It always seems like there will be something they will need that isn't there.

5719 Ettrick	Lawnmower	1
Houston, TX  77035	Edger	1
	Chainsaw	1
	Rakes	8
	Hammers	5
	Screwdrivers - phillips	2
	Screwdrivers - flat	2
	Weedwacker - gas	1
	Shovels	2
	Handsaw	2
	Crowbars (to pry old boards)	3
	Wire brushes	20
	Ladders - 6'	4
	Ladders - 8'	4
	Tape measurer	2

	Everyone should bring:	Gloves
		Sunscreen
		Bug spray
		Jeans and long sleeve shirt at volunteers discretion
		Wear clothes appropriate to paint
		Disposable Camera if wanted

Buses & Lunch

A bus will leave for the morning shift at 8:15 AM and at 1:00 PM from the Enron building.  Box lunches will be provided at the Enron building in the lobby.  If you are working all day a lunch will be sent for you on the 1:00 PM bus.

Here is the link for mapquest:
http://www.mapquest.com/cgi-bin/ia_find?link=btwn%2Ftwn-map_results&random=565&event=find_search&SNVData=&address=5719+Ettrick&city=houston&State=tx&Zip=&Find+Map.x=15&Find+Map.y=6

If you have any questions or suggestions, please don't hesitate to call me.  I will be at your site in the morning to kick everyone off!!  Let's have a fun day, help some people, and show the Enron spirit!!!

Rebecca
832-725-1174 (cell)


We have received an executed Amendment to Guarantee Agreement from Great Lakes Power Inc., Guarantor for Maclaren Energy Inc., which increases the amount of the Guaranty.

Copies will be distributed.

Stephanie Panus


The attached model has the RAROC and COS model in the various spreadsheet.
The rates I gave on the matrix and the COS rate track for the 500 MMBTU/d
expansion at the $613,500M unleveraged.  We would experience negative
depreciation for the first five years of the project.  Under the 70/30 debt
equity scenario we would have a rate about $.58 and that tracks with the DCF
model, and we would have escalating depreciation rates over the term of the
project.


This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit.
Your mailbox size is currently 76692 KB.

Mailbox size limits:

	When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.To check the size of your mailbox:

  Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today),
  Select Properties and click the Folder Size button.
  This method can be used on individual folders as well.

To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries.

You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.

To turn Journaling off,
 click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items.

See client Help for more information.


Mark - Attached is the marked up and clean version of the risk management
policy I'd like to include in the upcoming BOD meeting - the packages will be
sent out at the end of this week.  Would you please review the changes at
your earliest convenience and let me know if you have any comments?  Most
changes are just verbiage/wording changes.  See section VII where I tried to
incorporate your comments to clarify employee trading.  If you want to
expand, feel free.

Thank you,

Cassandra.
x30429


Hi Everyone,

We only have FOUR (yes, 4!) people signed up for the Deans' Dinner on
Tuesday, February 29!  This is a great opportunity to talk with Dean Tyson
in a small informal environment, and I hope more of you will take advantage
of this opportunity.

Pleaes stop by the office to sign up!

Cheers,

Diane


Who will/can sign the turbine contract for Enron?

Thanks,

Kay


Good Afternon Sara,

Here is the revised confirmation that I believe captures what they are
looking to accomplish. They are looking for us to create one confirmation
that is open ended to allow additional trades as well as deletions along the
way. I believe this language accompishes this concept.

Please review and advise should any changes be required.

Thanks again!

Jorge


Please plan to meet Stan Jablonski in the Plaza this afternoon at 3:30 p.m.
today, May 16, 2001.

Suzanne and I will  come by with the hardhats and safety glasses while you
are waiting in the Plaza.

Thank you.


First,  I thought the inservice was to be earlier than 3rd quarter??  confused
Second, on term I'd suggest we say a minimum of five years, so if someone
wants to bid for a longer term they can--
Third, in the 3rd paragraph change the reference to term, to as specifed
above-
Fourth, in the last paragraph, add minimum term of five years again.

MK

Steven Harris
12/04/2000 08:07 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Draft Open Season Posting

Yes, I thought was to not take back space in the EOT area since we have some
available and were not looking to expand there.

Drew Fossum
12/04/2000 07:57 AM
To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Draft Open Season Posting

Looks OK to me, subject to approval from MKM's group.  Should we also solicit
turnback in the East of Thoreau area in addition to soliciting it from Cal.
border to Thoreau?  Is it our theory that since Thor.-Cal is the constrained
segment, thats the only area we need to solicit turnback on?  DF

Lindy Donoho
12/01/2000 02:22 PM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Draft Open Season Posting

Attached is a draft posting for the 10,000/d mainline expansion.  Please let
me know your comments by the end of the day Monday, December 4th.

Thanks!


That should be fine.

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rangel, Ina
Sent:	Wednesday, May 16, 2001 4:50 PM
To:	Shively, Hunter S.; Allen, Phillip K.; Neal, Scott; Martin, Thomas A.; Vickers, Frank; Tycholiz, Barry; Lagrasta, Fred
Subject:	Friday 5/25/01

Deskheads:

I would like to have a 2 hour team building session for the assistants, receptionists, and clerks on Friday 5/25/01.  The only thing that will be charged to your cost center is the cost of a lunch brought in for the administrative staff.

I know that the assistants usually are out of here between 12:30 to 1:30 being that this is a Friday before a holiday.   I would like to have the session start at 12:30 so that they can still be out of here by 2:30 that day.  This would require the phones being on solo pilot starting at 12:30.

Please respond with your approval, questions and/or comments as soon as time permits so I can set everything up this week.

Many thanks,
Ina Rangel


Hi Eric,

Thanks for getting back to me - I believe there are a number of issues to
address to ensure that the integration goes smoothly from a risk management
and quantitative analysis perspective, and I have put together a (by no means
exhaustive) list:-

i) seamless transfer of front and middle office systems from an exotic
options linking perspective (e.g. their spreadsheets link to different option
pricing add-ins)
ii) development of volatility curves and factor analysis to ensure that we
can capture metals risk in our VaR system (we will require historical data
for this).
iii) ensure that MG staff on quant and risk side become familiar with our
methods and systems and vice versa

These tasks will involve a significant degree of cross-communication with
relevant contacts within MG metals, and so I look forward to starting on the
process as soon as possible - I hope to play a full part from a quantitative
research and risk management perspective to ensure that everything goes
smoothly in this exciting new development, so please do not hesitate to
involve me.

Best regards,

Anjam Ahmad
Research
x35383

	Enron Europe

	From:  Anjam Ahmad                           15/06/2000 16:18

To: Eric Gadd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Quant Analysis & Structuring for Metals Business

Dear Eric,

I understand from Dale that you are co-ordinating the integration of MG
Metals into Enron Europe.  Dale and I thought it would be a good idea to
ensure that we are fully prepared from a quantitative research and
structuring perspective so that we can "hit the ground running" when they do
arrive.  I would be grateful if you could provide a contact person in MG
metals that may look after this area, or someone who may find it useful to
discuss and identify their possible future modelling requirements.

Thanks & regards,

Anjam Ahmad
Research
x35383


Thank you for contacting me.  The new baby is doing great.  I would like to
add you guys to the box if you are interested.  I would also like to have
your west physical guys on my box.  It has been brought to my attention that
APB has great fixed price physical flow.  If you are not aware, I am running
the physical desk as well.  Let everyone know that it will based on one
condition - All numbers or no numbers.  We do not wish to participate in a
closed market.

Call me later.

Mike Grigsby
713-853-7031


Start Date: 1/13/02; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011314.txt


Approved.  Please process.

Thanks,
Sally Beck


changed to Prebon

Stephanie Piwetz   04/04/2001 02:13 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: checkout 4/4/01

Kate,
apb not showing Richter deal 570023.01, prebon claiming.  Thanks


Matt - Zhiyun needs to make some code changes before I can move Craig to Palo in Enpower (she needs
to treat Craig as a separate region from Palo so the deal will value as a Basis Option).  Therefore I will not be changing this until she is ready.
I will keep you updated.

For the term of the UAMPS deal -  Rockies is marked flat to Palo - so I ran the Intrinsic & Extrinsic evaluation.
Once we change Craig to Palo in enpower and the correlation, we can revalue.

MTM = 1,243,586
Intrinsic = 712,104
Extrinsic = 531,483


Bob -- Having read through his notes from the CEA negotiations, Ken now
agrees that this was the intent of Congress.   Ken continues to believe that
there is "zero interest" in Congress in fixing this problem (I would ask
Chris to confirm this).   Therefore, you are right -- the rulemaking process
will be critical.

I suggest a short conference call (with or without Ken) this week to discuss
our strategy.   If we want Ken to join us, he's available Tues and Thurs.   I
think it would be helpful for Ken to participate.

Lisa

	Robert Bruce
	Sent by: Robert Bruce
	01/26/2001 12:35 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Speech by CFTC's Paul Archietzel

I just got off the phone with Bill Nissen.  He is at an ABA seminar at which
Paul Archietzel spoke today.  Mr. Archietzel is with the CFTC's Division of
Economic Analysis and (Bill believes) is very involved in rule drafting and
promulgation.

According to Bill, Mr. Archietzel stated in his speech that he believes it
was no accident that Congress referred to "agricultural commodities" (rather
than the enumerated grains and meats) in the CFMA when establishing which
commodities will continue to be subject to full regulation.  Mr. Archietzel
also expressly stated that there is at least a possibility that pulp and
paper would be considered "agricultural commodities" as used in the CFMA.

Obviously, then, the upcoming rulemaking process could be of critical
importance to our pulp and paper business as well as our agriculture
business. We will clearly need to monitor the process very closely, and
strongly consider getting involved in the comment process.

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


Here is May 3rd edition....prevented again from being sent out due to Outlook
problems we were experiencing yesterday.

This information is for the private use of the recipient and may not be
disclosed to any other entity (including affiliates) without the prior
written consent of Enron North America.  All of the above prices are
&indicative8 prices  and are subject to change depending upon changing market
conditions and liquidity.  The transactions are also subject to negotiation
of mutually acceptable definitive agreements, satisfactory credit
arrangements and the approval of the respective management,s of our two
companies. This term sheet is not intended to create a binding or enforceable
contract nor is it an offer or a commitment to enter into any transaction.
All terms are subject to change until  agreement as to a specific transaction
has been reached.  ENA is not acting as a fiduciary or advisor and you should
evaluate and understand the terms, conditions, and risks of all transactions
in making your decisions with respect theret


Another substantive change to consider is the allocation of firm capacity at
Wheeler Ridge between the north and south points.  Currently the settlement
has 520 for WH-N and 120 for WH-S for a total of 680.  PG&E has proposed a
"let the market decide" approach on the primary/secondary split by setting
each receipt point at its physical capacity (WH-N @ 520 and WH-S @ 500 with
the combination not greater than 680).  This approach provides more
flexibility to the shipper to move between the two points and maintain the
quality of the firm service.  I do not see any cost to SoCal or any other
party to the settlement by making this change.  I know Rich Hall has
discussed this with several of you already.  Attached is a document he sent
me outlining proposal.  Calpine supports this change but realizes that all
parties need to agree.

Thanks

Craig

 <<Wheeler Ridge capacity .rtf>>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sullivan, Glen J. [SMTP:GSullivan@sempra.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 12:58 PM
> To: 'MBD'; 'Leslie, John'; 'Elsesser, Evie'; 'McCrea, Keith'; 'Pocta, R.
> Mark'; 'Dasovich, Jeff'; 'Beach, Tom'; 'Burkholder, John'; 'Amirault,
> Paul'; 'Alexander, Michael'; 'Chancellor, Craig'; 'Dingwall, B.';
> 'Douglass, Dan@SES'; 'Fawcett, Jeff'; 'Porter, Doug'; 'Rochman, Michael';
> 'Counihan, Rick'; 'Bayless, David'; 'Paul, Joe'; 'Jimison, John'; 'Foss,
> Robert'; McVay, Nancy W - TPNWM; 'Scott, Susan'; 'Karp, Joe'; 'Johnson,
> Pamela'; 'gileau, patrick'
> Cc: Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL; Nelson, Eric B. - TPEBN; Morrow, Rick - TP3RMM;
> Follett, B. David - TPDBF; Brill, Thomas R.; Van Lierop, Jan - TP2JXV;
> Harrigan, James P. - TP1JPH; Sakarias, Wayne P.; Purves, Ralph A.; Teeter,
> James S.; Watson, Steven - TP2SAW; Cherry, Brian - TPBKC; Whitaker, Sue
> Subject: RE: Gas Industry Settlement
>
> To signatories to the Comprehensive Settlement:
>
> ALJ Biren has given us until Friday of this week (April 28, 2000) to file
> "errata" to the Comprehensive Settlement.
>
> So far, I am planning to make the following non-substantive changes:
>
> 1.  The table of contents was seriously messed up by an "automatic update"
> feature in Word just before we duplicated and filed.  I will be putting it
> back to the state you saw in the final draft.
>
> 2.  On p.7, section 1.12, put a period at the end of the last sentence.
>
> 3.  On p.9, section 1.1.3.1,  two thirds of the way down the page, I will
> be
> changing "subject to adjustment annual by the base rate PBR formula" to
> "subject to adjustment annually by the base rate PBR formula".
>
> 4. On p.27, section 1.5.4, in the third full paragraph on the page, I will
> be changing "If only one customer has an OFO day" to "If only one customer
> class has an OFO day".
>
> 5.  Also on p.27, section 1.5.4, bottom line on the page, I will be
> filling
> in the blank with "C" (so it reads "Appendix C")
>
>
> In the category of "maybe substantive",
>
> 1.  On p.10, section 1.1.3.2, three lines from the bottom of the page, the
> date "October 1, 2000" would be changed to "October 1, 2001".  This
> sentence
> refers to including the cost of backbone transmission for core customers
> buying gas from SoCalGas in the "procurement" rate.  Obviously, our intent
> was to do that only once we had unbundled backbone transmission, which
> happens on October 1, 2001.
>
>
> In the category of "substantive":
>
> 1.  Our capacity term sheet had said that we would unbundled "additional"
> (non-reliability) storage for CTAs effective upon implementation of the
> settlement (See p.4).  The filed settlement managed to drop the section
> that
> provided for this option for CTAs prior to the principal storage change on
> April 1, 2001.  (The filed settlement is ok for the period starting April
> 1,
> 2001).  So, to be consistent with the term sheet, we need to insert
> something back into the settlement to allow CTAs to opt out of
> non-reliability storage in the period from the effective date (90 days
> after
> approval) to April 1, 2001.  Obviously, this may not be a very long
> period.
> John Leslie has suggested inserting at the very beginning of Section
> 5.4.4.3:  "In the partial storage year beginning on the effective date of
> this Settlement Agreement, and....[continue with current text]."  We would
> need to cover as part of implementation filings the exact
> mechanism/pricing
> for SoCalGas purchasing gas in storage owned by CTAs if they opt out of
> nonreliability storage prior to April 1. 2001.  SoCalGas and SDG&E are ok
> with John's language and want to make sure it is ok with other
> signatories.
>
>
> If you have any problems with any of these changes, please contact me or
> Brian Cherry by noon on Friday, April 28.  My email is
> gsullivan@sempra.com
> and my phone is (619) 699-5162.  Brian's email is bcherry@sempra.com and
> phone is (213) 244-3895.
>
> We are looking at the possibility of two or three additional changes, and
> Brian may send you a follow-up message.
>
> -- Glen Sullivan
> Sempra Energy Law Dept.

 - Wheeler Ridge capacity .rtf


How does everybody look for a discussion concerning the VEPCO interconnection
agreement on Tuesday, Sept 19?

I've checked with Christi, Mitch and Reagan, so they don't need to confirm.

Details to follow...

Thanks,

Kay


Vince/Stinson,

I met with Rebecca McDonald, and introduced her to Mr. Sud on Saturday.

The meeting went on quite well, and Mr. Sud repeated the point he had made to
me regarding NTPC buying the power.  He did not ask for any consulting or
other contract, but said that he would try to help.

Rebecca seemed happy with the meeting, but I do not know whether she has a
plan in mind going forward.

I can give you more details of the meeting if anyone is interested.  I do
believe that Mr. Sud is well connected in India.

Regards,
Sandeep.


Please print out the attached on my letterhead & bring it over to me.  Thank
you!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 01/11/2000
03:03 PM ---------------------------

Lorraine Lindberg
01/11/2000 02:32 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Red Cedar Letter

Here it is.


Thanks.  With that, unless I hear otherwise from folks by 4 PM PST---and all
suggestions on how to make the comment better are welcome and
appreciated---I'll go ahead and forward on to Art O'Donnell.

	Richard Shapiro
	11/30/2000 02:45 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, skean@enron.com, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Press Statement on Bad PUC Gas Decision? Need to decide by 4 PM
(PST)

I would say we engage on this and other issues in California  in a more
assertive manner- message is fine. Laying low and  working backchannels is
working great so far??? NOT

From: Jeff Dasovich on 11/30/2000 02:41 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, skean@enron.com, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Press Statement on Bad PUC Gas Decision?  Need to decide by 4 PM
(PST)

As you know, we've been working for about an eternity to unbundle SoCalGas'
system.  90+% of the industry agreed to an unbundling solution and filed it
as a settlement at the Commission.  In opposition, muni generators and TURN
supported SoCalGas' original proposal to essentially maintain the status quo
(SoCalGas eventually came over to our side, as did Southern California
Edison).

A judge's proposed decision came out the day before Thanksgiving adopting the
settlement advocated by the muni generators and TURN.

If it weren't for the continual barrage of retrograde policy pronouncements
coming from the "new" California PUC, folks would be genuinely shocked by the
judge's proposed decision, but as things are, it was somewhat expected.

There's one silver lining:  We managed to get in both settlements an
identical provision that eliminates a substantial amount of financial risk TW
would have faced but for the provision.  So from that perspective, the choice
to go with the TURN/muni settlement and embrace the status quo does no harm.
It does considerable harm, however, when compared to the significant value
that would have been created if the judge adopted the the unbundling
settlement.

We have a chance to go on the record in a trade publication "California
Energy Markets."  Recent events might persuade us to keep a low profile
generally at this point.  On the other hand, perhaps the time is right to
start coming out of our corner just a bit and pointing out the very poor job
this Commission is doing in managing California's energy policy.  I'm
squarely on the fence at this point and am seeking feedback.  A proposed
comment is attached.

Two questions:

1) Do folks think that there's value in providing a comment?

2) If so, does this statement work, or do folks have suggestions?

Thanks,
Jeff

"The California Public Utilities Commission has a choice. It can adopt the
same, common sense natural gas policy for Southern California that,s been in
place and working well for consumers in PG&E,s service territory.  Or it
stick with the status quo, which the industry agrees is at least partially
responsible for bottlenecks and high prices in California.  The proposed
decision opts for the status quo.  That's not going to California,s natural
gas problems and it,s likely to make matters worse in California's electric
industry."


Thanks very much for your help and please thank Steve for me also.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [SMTP:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 9:46 AM
> To: lgeorge@ccj-law.com
> Cc: Steve.Van.Hooser@enron.com
> Subject: Maps
>
> Per Steve's request, I am forwarding a phone number of a consulting
> company
> that produces maps which show all pipeline in Texas (sorted by county).
> This might be a good place to start to find the pipeline you described in
> your voice mail to Steve.
>
> The company is Design Technics Corp.  Phone: (713) 460-2291.  The map will
> generally show where the pipeline runs, but it is depicted at more of a
> macro level.
>
>