Californians Nervous on Electricity
By JOHN HOWARD

09/22/2000
AP Online
Copyright 2000 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - The long, hot summer is ending for San Diego's
electricity customers. But millions of other Californians fear they could
face the same kind of misery when deregulation reaches their part of state.
San Diego-area ratepayers were horrified to see their electricity bills
triple this summer when the region became the first in California to
deregulate.
Next up is Pacific Gas and Electric Co., with 4.5 million customers from
Bakersfield to the Oregon line. It wants to lift the lid on rates next
spring, or even sooner.
And Southern California Edison, which serves 4.3 million customers in the Los
Angeles metropolitan area, has not said when it wants to deregulate, but
under state law it has to happen by 2002.
"Everybody's worried. But ratepayers have paid enough. They've overpaid, and
they're not going to pay a penny more," said Harvey Rosenfield, a consumer
advocate in Santa Monica.
The state Public Utilities Commission, which wrote the first report seven
years ago urging deregulation, said in a grim assessment that more problems
loom on the horizon unless there is a "mid-course correction."
The summer's woes "represent a precursor of what lies ahead for California 's
economy over the next 30 months," the PUC said.
The PUC is investigating its options, which could include putting the brakes
on deregulation.
The 1996 deregulation law was pushed mainly by big industrial customers, who
wanted lower rates. It was supported by utilities and free-market advocates.
Consumer groups generally opposed it. It was overwhelmingly supported by
lawmakers and signed by then-Gov. Pete Wilson.
Under the law, utilities would be forced to sell their energy-producing
assets, such as dams and power plants, and buy power instead on the open
market.
The theory was that competition would drive down rates. But it didn't work
out that way.
When San Diego Gas & Electric , with 1.2 million customers, deregulated, the
average monthly residential bill there and in southern Orange County rocketed
from $40 to $68 to $130 in less than three months.
Ratepayers and politicians were so alarmed that California retreated somewhat
from deregulation by rolling back San Diego rates and promising a $100
million rebate to customers there.
Most agree that an inadequate supply of a power - combined with high demand,
caused by a sweltering summer, a booming economy and a growing population -
precipitated the soaring rates.
The episode has raised concern that the deregulation law is deeply flawed and
tries to accomplish too much too quickly.
Five power plants are under construction and at least a dozen more are
proposed, but none will be ready to boost supplies this year, or most of the
next. None were built in recent years because investors were wary of the
uncertain California market.
In the meantime, other states are watching California and at least one -
neighboring Nevada - may drop plans to deregulate.
"Our hope is that the states that stumbled into deregulation reconsider, and
that those that have not yet acted don't even bother," said Charlie Higgley
of Public Citizen, a Washington-based consumer group.
At least a half-dozen other states are in some phase of deregulation,
including Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and
Connecticut. None has experienced the roller-coaster rates California has.
That's because they did it differently, according to industry experts. In
some cases they did not force the sell-off of generation facilities, or they
took more time.
PG&E has lost about $2.2 billion since June and SoCal Edison has been running
up similar losses while they await deregulation. That's because the utilities
rates' have been frozen during the transition period, while they sell off
their power-generating assets.
Once they sell off their assets, the utilities want to pass those costs on to
their customers. That alarms consumer advocates.
Rosenfield, who wrote a 1988 ballot proposal that cut insurance rates, said a
ballot initiative to roll back electric rates is in the works.
"There is a ratepayer rebellion," he said. "It started in San Diego, it has
spread to the Bay Area and in two years it will be everywhere in the state."
---


Please note the following changes:
Alliant Services Company (Alliantser)
Is now
Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc.
The Global Counterparty record will be overlayed in the next few days.


Steve, would like your reaction to this......thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Pieper, Kalen
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 7:41 AM
To: Barnard, Marla; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec; Joyce, Mary; Lynch, Drew;
Olson, Cindy; Smith, Gary P.
Subject: Promotion Criteria -

As promised, attached are the promotion criteria that David and team have
drafted.  Please get comments back to all on list by 6/11.    The decisions
below were agreed to for mid-year HR PRC:

There will be no Sr. Director roles within HR.  We will not promote any HR
employees to this title this year.  We will grandfather those that are in
currently in Sr. Director and VP titles unless peformance dictates otherwise.
Sr. Directors and some VPs will be PRCed with the Directors
We will discuss the Analysts and Associates that were rated 1 or 2 and ensure
that we are considering Analysts and Associates in our staffing process.

Let me know if I left anything out.  Have a great week
kp


- G

Could you send the cover letter with your revisions?  I'll go ahead and make
it specific to each counterparty.

Thanks,
Tyrell Harrison
303 575 6478


for your reading pleasure.

tim
---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Belden/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001 07:25 AM
---------------------------

Alan Comnes
04/13/2001 01:50 PM
To: gfergus@brobeck.com, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, rcarroll@bracepatt.com, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Fw: Fact sheet re: Cal ISO study

From the Bonneville Power Administration:
>
> > This fact sheet addresses statements in a recent L.A. Times article
> > asserting that BPA, among others, manipulated prices on the California
> > electricity market.
> >
> > AEs, CAEs and other BPA staff may distribute the fact sheet to outside
> > parties as you believe appropriate.
> >
> >                       <<CA_sales_TP3.doc>>
> >
> > For additional information, contact Steve Oliver at (503) 230-3295.
>

 - CA_sales_TP3.doc


Mark, Dave, I talked to Lavorato regarding a non-compete... he was fine with proceeding to negotiate a commercial deal but did not want us to commit to a non compete ( just yet) for these reasons.

1. He wants to not restrict EES in their abilities to market in that region ( I will discuss with Delainey).
2. Unless we have an exclusive he thinks we are boxing ourselves.

Pls digest these points as you proceed and keep me posted on where Cascade is even with the paper we showed to them.

BT


see this attachment:


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Get 5 BESTSELLERS FOR $1 + A FREE ATTACHE CASE with
membership to The Book-of-the-Month Club(R). Save on your
favorites: Stephen King, James Patterson, Mary Higgins Clark,
John Grisham, Amy Tan & so many others. You?ll save on all
the "must read" books! Click for details.
http://by.advertising.com/1/c/62072/33364/155726/155726

<a href="http://by.advertising.com/1/c/62072/33364/155726/155726">
AOL users click here </a>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

   Word of the Day for Sunday March 3, 2002:

   celerity \suh-LAIR-uh-tee\, noun:
   Rapidity of motion or action; quickness; swiftness.

     Though  not in the best of physical form, he was capable of
     moving with celerity.
     --Malachy McCourt, [1]A Monk Swimming: A Memoir

     Furthermore,  as  is  well known, computer technology grows
     obsolete with amazing celerity.
     --Alan  S. Blinder and Richard E. Quandt, "The Computer and
     the Economy," [2]The Atlantic, December 1997

     The lightning celerity of his thought processes took you on
     a  kind  of  helter-skelter  ride of surreal non-sequiturs,
     sudden  accesses of emotion and ribald asides, made all the
     more  bizarre  for  being uttered in those honeyed tones by
     the impeccably elegant gent before you.
     --"A life full of frolics," [3]The Guardian, May 19, 2001
     _________________________________________________________

   Celerity  is  from Latin celeritas, from celer, "swift." It is
   related to accelerate.

References

   1. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0786884142/ref%3Dnosim/lexico
   2. http://www.theatlantic.com/
   3. http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardian/

_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._

You are currently subscribed to Dictionary.com Word of the Day as:
matt.motley@enron.com

To subscribe to the list by email, send a blank message to:
join-WordoftheDay@lists.lexico.com

To unsubscribe via email, send a blank message to:
leave-wordoftheday-357530C@lists.lexico.com

Subscriptions can be turned on and off from the Web at
http://www.dictionary.com/wordoftheday/list/

Dictionary.com Word of the Day
http://www.dictionary.com/wordoftheday/
(C) 2002 by Lexico Publishing Group, LLC.


Wednesday, July 19

Hello alphaman_2001,

Welcome to Yahoo! Sports Fantasy Golf.

You have created a team called E Force, and are now ready to
participate in Fantasy Golf, a weekly game that let's you
compete against other fans from around the world.

Your goal is to earn more points than other managers by
selecting the players who perform the best in actual
professional golf tournaments. Each week you'll pick a team
consisting of two A players, four B players and two C players.
Of these players you'll select a foursome (one A, two B, and
one C) to activate for each round.

The deadline for picking new players for the week's tournament
is Wednesday at 11:59pm PT. The deadline to set your foursome
for each round is 11:59pm PT the night before that round.

Thanks for joining. See you on the green.

--Fantasy Golf Commissioner
http://golf.fantasysports.yahoo.com/golf


According to Les, we don't need to confirm any of these deals. I guess they
were deals done by the Real Time desk on behalf of Services, but they were
entered incorrectly. Thanks for checking, though.

Kate

From: Amy Smith/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/29/2001 10:21 AM CST
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Willamette confirms

Hi Kate,

Do we need to confirm Les Rawson's Wilamette Deals?

564024
564019
564018
564017
564016
564015
564012
564007
564004
564002
564001
563994

They all had some sort of replacement comment so I just wanted to double
check to see if we should confirm.

Thanks!!
Amy


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2000
07:26 AM ---------------------------

"NW on Linux" <Linux@bdcimail.com> on 04/27/2000 04:57:17 AM
Please respond to "Linux Help" <NWReplies@bellevue.com>
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Getting Linux-certified

NETWORK WORLD FUSION FOCUS: PHIL HOCHMUTH
on LINUX
Today's focus: Getting Linux-certified
04/26/00

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

Subscribe to the "Whitepapers Download"
newsletter from Network World!!
Keep up-to-date with summaries and links to the latest vendor-sponsored
whitepapers on Network World Fusion.
Subscribe to Whitepapers Download at
http://www.nwfusion.com/go/wppromo.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Today's focus: Getting Linux-certified
---------------------------------------------
By Phil Hochmuth

Most networking professionals are probably familiar with certification
programs for various operating systems and technologies. With more
enterprises using Linux, several companies have started to offer Linux
certification and training.

One of the most popular programs is run by - not surprisingly - the top
Linux company, Red Hat. The leading Linux distributor offers training
and certification of its product for network professionals in a program
similar to system-specific certifications such as Certified Novell
Engineer and Microsoft Certified Software Engineer.

Red Hat,s Certified Engineer (RHCE) program is a five-day course that
consists of four one-day labs followed by a certification test taken on
the fifth day. Prerequisites for the course include knowledge of basic
Intel- and Intel clone-based hardware architecture, familiarity with
basic Unix file structure and shell programming, TCP/IP networking
skills and network administration experience. The test can also be
taken on its own, without the four days of labs.

Unlike the widely accessible Microsoft or Novell certification programs,
RHCE courses and tests are only available at Red Hat training
facilities in Durham, N.C., Portland, Ore., San Francisco and Santa
Clara. The course costs $2,498; the test can be taken alone for $749.

Red Hat certification can be valuable for companies investing heavily
in Red Hat Linux as an alternative network operating system, or for IT
professionals looking for a certification feather in their caps.
However, the program has been criticized by some for its poor
accessibility and high cost. The single-distribution focus of the
training has also been at issue with some Linux users looking for
certification options.

For Linux certification and training that isn,t tied to any specific
distribution, the Linux Professional Institute (LPI) has less expensive
certification test offerings.

LPI offers basic, advanced and expert levels of Linux certification.
The beginning level certifies users beyond a basic help desk or
power-user level of knowledge. Prerequisites for this course are equal
to the Red Hat program. The second level requires more in-depth study
for people looking for a system administrator,s level of certification.
The third level is for certification in more advanced and specialized
areas, such as database server administration or kernel and device
driver development. Each level involves two tests, which cost $100 each
to take. Currently, only the requirements for the first level of the
LPI program have been finalized; requirements for the second and third
levels could change in the near future. LPI,s tests are administered
through Virtual University Enterprises, 1,700 test centers worldwide.
Among LPI,s backers are Caldera, SuSE, Linuxcare, IBM and TurboLinux.

Another option for distribution-neutral Linux certification is the Sair
GNU and Linux Certification program. Similar to the LPI model, the
program offers three levels of certification: Linux Certified
Administrator (LCA) for basic administrative-level certification; Linux
Certified Engineer (LCE) for advanced system managers; and Master Linux
Certified Engineer (MLCE) for senior systems managers. Four tests are
required for each level of certification, with LCA, LCE and MLCE
programs currently available. Certification tests cost $99 each and can
be taken at 2,000 Sylvan Prometric testing centers worldwide.

To contact Phil Hochmuth:
-------------------------
Phil Hochmuth is a writer and researcher for Network World, and
a former systems integrator. You can reach him at
mailto:phochmut@nww.com.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FOR RELATED LINKS -- Click here for Network World's home page:
http://www.nwfusion.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Find out more about Red Hat, LPI and SAIR certification programs:

Red Hat Training:
http://www.redhat.com/services/training/training.html

LPI:
http://www.LPI.org

Linux Certification:
http://www.linuxcertification.com

Find the testing and certification resources for Linux and other
technologies:

Virtual University:
http://www.vue.com

Linux nerds:
http://www.linuxnerds.com

SAGE Certification:
http://www.usenix.org/sage/cert

Archive of Network World Fusion Focus on Linux newsletters:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/linux/

May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered at your
fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by receiving 51 FREE
issues to our print publication. Apply today at
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl

*********************************************************
Subscription Services

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail newsletters,go
to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To change your email address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to This
message.

Other Questions/Comments

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor, at:
mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Account Executive,
at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Network World Fusion is part of IDG.net, the IDG Online Network.
IT All Starts Here:
http://www.idg.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2000


Richard,

Due to the release of the Options Manager in EOL, we need a new UOM set up in
global for MM-L.  This MM-L implies that the options are traded in lots
online but need to convert to MMBTU for valuation purposes.  Therefore, 1
MM-L = 10,000 MMBTU.  Can you please let me know if you need further
information to set up this Global UOM?

Thank you for your help!  Hope you feel better!

Dawn
3-9353


no information is yet public.  you may want to see if they have a website and
if there's any information there.

best,
jeff


Jeff - thanks for the CR related information. FYI - I am now in EES and will be going to the conference with you and Laurie. Please let me know if there is anything you need. I will be handling logistics and media.

Laura

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Fri 10/19/2001 4:00 PM
To: Siegel, Misha; Bourgeois-Galloway, Hilda; Parquet, David
Cc: Schwartz, Laura
Subject: RE: Community Affairs-related Activity

Super. Dave will get back to you with the details.  Thanks for your help.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Siegel, Misha
Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:33 PM
To:     Dasovich, Jeff; Bourgeois-Galloway, Hilda; Parquet, David
Cc:     Schwartz, Laura
Subject:        RE: Community Affairs-related Activity

Hi Jeff,
Among other things, Community Relations is here to help the business units drive their business!  Please forward any related materials to my attention, either via email or to the Enron building (1400 Smith St, eb1632b, Houston, TX  77002). A list of support categories would be helpful!

Thanks,
Misha

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:00 AM
To:     Bourgeois-Galloway, Hilda; Parquet, David
Cc:     Siegel, Misha
Subject:        RE: Community Affairs-related Activity

Thanks very much.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Bourgeois-Galloway, Hilda
Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:37 AM
To:     Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:     Siegel, Misha
Subject:        RE: Community Affairs-related Activity
Importance:     High

Hi Jeff:

Got you message and I'm copying this to Misha Siegel.  Misha is the person who can help you with this.

Hilda

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:   Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:36 PM
To:     Parquet, David; Bourgeois-Galloway, Hilda
Subject:        FW: Community Affairs-related Activity

Hi Hilda:
I got an "out of office" reply from Elyse that mentions that you're the contact in her absense.  Please see the note below.

Best,
Jeff
 -----Original Message-----
From:   Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:   Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:28 PM
To:     Kalmans, Elyse; Parquet, David
Subject:        Community Affairs-related Activity

Hi Elyse:
I work in government affairs in San Francisco.  Dave Parquet (VP, Western Origination) has been approached by a California state legislator to participate in a golf tournament, the proceeds of which will go to a children's charity (Dave, correct me if I got it wrong).  The legislator is someone who has been and will likely continue to be supportive of Dave's on-going commercial activities and Dave would like to participate.  I've been informed that this could fall under the sorts of activities that community affairs has resources for.  Is that right?  Thanks for the help.

Best,
Jeff


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 04:11 PM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	09/25/2000 04:05 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global
Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 09/25/00

The EOL approvals for 09/25/00 are attached below.

Regards,
bd


fyi.  print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
04:46 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Katherine Brown @ ENRON                           11/13/2000 02:50 PM

To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Diomedes Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Cox/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Elliott/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew
S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON,
Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron,
Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth
Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES,
Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES, G G
Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron, Susan
Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Beena Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K
Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Rosane
Fabozzi/SA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget
Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carol Ann Brown/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee
Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tori L
Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores
Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mercedes Estrada/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauren
Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine
Brown/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
Bobbie Power/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Suzanne Danz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy
McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fiona Stewart/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jana L Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connie
Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Kerry
Ferrari/LON/ECT@ECT, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Adams/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Leah Rijo/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Lucy Marshall/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn
Greer/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Executive Committee Residential Addresses

As promised, below is a list of home addresses for the Executive Committee
(as attached is a list of spouses names). Please do not share this list with
anyone not on the Executive Committtee.
Thank you,
Katherine


Sound is right...I heard him barking this morning again. I guess he was calling out to Indy to see if he could come out to play.
  laura.jewett@bakerbotts.com wrote: It wasn't him, he is home safe and sound.-----Original Message-----
From: zaeza [mailto:zaeza@unplace.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 4:33 PM
To: emca@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: *EMCA* missing dog

is his dog missing? I had to take that puppy to the spca cause he was an escape artistsomebody told me that a family had taken this dog in for about a week, but it kept getting out and they didn't want the responsibility anymore----- Original Message ----- From: laura.jewett@bakerbotts.com To: emca@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:13 AMSubject: RE: *EMCA* missing dog
That could be "Zorro" - he lives at 904 Bomar - Gary is his dad.  -----Original Message-----
From: zaeza [mailto:  zaeza@unplace.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 1:02 PM
To: emca@yahoogroups.com
Subject: *EMCA* missing dog

anyone missing or know someone who is missing a young, black male lab-mix?found him wandering around the street today - not very car-wise...NathalieBomar
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

---------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions Great stuff seeking new owners! Bid now!


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Rick Buy and Mark Haedicke@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 12:03 AM
To:	All Enron Worldwide Special@ENRON
Subject:	New Legal Team to Assist RAC

	In order to bring better legal coordination and standardization to Enron's Risk Assessment and Control (RAC) group, we have formed a new legal group, which will initially include Lisa Mellencamp (Finance), Marcus Nettelton (Power Trading), Carol St. Clair (Broadband/Power Trading), Mary Cook (Financial Swaps), Peter Keohane (Canada), Ed Essandoh (Retail), Paul Darmitzel (Retail) and Elizabeth Sager (Power Trading) (Team Leader).  This group will focus on, among other things, managing Enron's exposures with bankrupt counterparties, working out credit solutions with distressed counterparties and standardizing our overall credit practices.  The initial members in this group have been drawn from Enron's numerous legal groups in order to gain a broader perspective.   Each of these members will provide support to this new group in addition to their current responsibilities.

	Within RAC, Michael Tribolet will focus on distressed counterparties, in conjunction with Bill Bradford, who continues to manage the Credit Risk Management group.

	Please join us in supporting the efforts of this new group.


John,
The outage requested for Friday has been approved by Kevin Presto.      I am glad to hear that the demin tank situation has been resolved.
The meeting that I attended was helpful in understanding your level of frustration.

If you have further questions,  please let me know.

John Forney


Susan,

Confirm for me that you want financial deals only......or not.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Susan
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 1:57 PM
To:	Anderson, Diane
Subject:	RE: Sodra Skogsagarna Ek

Diane,

As for the RMT matter the request is as follows:

	1.	Lives Deal as of November 30, 2001
	2.	Expired Deals since November 30, 2001
	3.	New Deals since November 30, 2001

Thanks for the help.

Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Diane
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 1:18 PM
To:	Bailey, Susan
Subject:	RE: Sodra Skogsagarna Ek

Ok.

And regarding the Risk Management deals......I forget what we decided....what "begin" date do you want on the query......deals from 12/1/01 forward or was in sometime in November?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Susan
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 12:14 PM
To:	Anderson, Diane
Subject:	RE: Sodra Skogsagarna Ek

Diane,

Thanks for confirming that the trades were with ECTRIC and not ENA -- thats what I had thought.

Yes-- please furnish copies of the confirms for the 2 deals to me.

Thanks,

Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Diane
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 11:16 AM
To:	Bailey, Susan; Mulvany, Patrick
Subject:	RE: Sodra Skogsagarna Ek

Susan,

I only see two and there were both done with ECTINTL.  Do you want to see those?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Susan
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 10:35 AM
To:	Anderson, Diane; Mulvany, Patrick
Subject:	Sodra Skogsagarna Ek

Diane or Patrick,

Please email or provide hard copies of the Confirmation(s) ENA has with the captioned counterparty.

Thanks
Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3803A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
Email: Susan.Bailey@enron.com


Gregg,

My thoughts on Allegheny's changes to the Master are similar to Mary's.  I am
generally fine with the changes except 1) I would counter with lowering the
liquidated damages to 10 cents (ultimately, this is a business decision)  and
2) I would tell them that we need arbitration.  In some respects, it is more
likely that disputes would arise under this type of deal so it is even more
important to have arbitration. Please let me know if you want me to talk to
anyone at Allegheny about their changes.

Stacy
----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 01:50 PM -----

	m.klyasheff@pecorp.com
	04/10/2001 04:23 PM

		 To: RRodrig5@enron.com, Gregg.Penman@enron.com, t.hermann@pecorp.com,
r.dobson@pecorp.com, r.rodriguez@pecorp.com
		 cc: Stacy.E.Dickson@enron.com, jeffrey.t.hodge@enron.com, s.halfin@pecorp.com
		 Subject: RE: Allegheny Term sheet and contract comments

 Attached, for your review, are my comments on Allegheny' proposed
revisions to the enovate Master Agreement.  The short answer is that I do
not oppose any of the changes, but there are at least two items that I
consider business decisions.
 <<Allegheny Master K memo 04-10-01.doc>>

> ----------
> From:  Rodriguez, Roy
> Sent:  Monday, April 09, 2001 5:02 PM
> To:  'RRodrig5@enron.com'; 'Greg Penman'; Hermann, Timothy; Klyasheff,
> Mary P.; Dobson, Richard E.
> Subject:  Allegheny Term sheet and contract comments
>
> <<File: Master Gas Firm Purchase Sale Agreement - clean
> 3Apr01.doc>><<File: Master Gas Firm Purchase Sale Agreement - marked
> 3Apr01.doc>>
> Attached are comments from Allegheny, please review and provide comments
> to me by Wed. afternoon or earlier if possible.
>
> Thanks everyone
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kostiner, Barry (CICG - NY SWAPS)
> [mailto:bkostiner@exchange.ml.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 4:53 PM
> To: 'r.rodriguez@pecorp.com'
> Cc: Kapoor, Ravi (CICG - NY SWAPS)
> Subject: FW: enovate
>
>
> I made an additional revision, changing CCT to CPT for the time zone.
>
> > Attached are the clean and blacklined versions of the enovate Gas
> Agreement and Confirmation.
> >
> > >  <<Balancing Service Term Sheet - clean 3Apr01.doc>> > >  <<Balancing
> Service Term Sheet - marked 3Apr01.doc>> > >  <<Master Gas Firm Purchase
> Sale Agreement - clean 3Apr01.doc>> > >  <<Master Gas Firm Purchase Sale
> Agreement - marked 3Apr01.doc>>
> >
> >
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance
upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - Allegheny Master K memo 04-10-01.doc


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Susan J. Mara
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: SJM11152001
Report Total: $448.94
Amount Due Employee: $448.94

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Have you done any deals yet?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


This article stems from confidential docs submitted to the Governor's office,
which were leaked to the press.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/02/2001 09:54 AM -----

	smara@enron.com
	Sent by: articles-email@ms1.lga2.nytimes.com
	05/02/2001 09:51 AM
	Please respond to smara

		 To: smara@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: NYTimes.com Article: Power Concern Offers California a Secret Deal

This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by smara@enron.com.

/-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\

Let NYTimes.com Come to You

Sign up for one of our weekly e-mails
and the news will come directly to you.
YOUR MONEY brings you a wealth of analysis
and information about personal investing.
CIRCUITS plugs you into the latest on
personal technology. TRAVEL DISPATCH offers
you a jump on special travel deals and news.

http://email.nytimes.com/email/email.jsp?eta5

\----------------------------------------------------------/

Power Concern Offers California a Secret Deal

By JEFF GERTH and LOWELL BERGMAN

 uke Energy, a power-generating company accused of overcharging
customers millions of dollars during California's year-old energy
crisis, has secretly offered Gov. Gray Davis a deal that it hopes
will solve its legal problems while helping to calm the state's
chaotic electricity markets.

 The proposed settlement, outlined in documents prepared in March
by Duke's lawyers, calls for an end to various state
investigations, private lawsuits and state complaints to federal
authorities accusing Duke of overcharging.

 In return, Duke would make an unspecified "appropriate payment"
but admit no wrongdoing.

 "Duke is committed to sharing pain" and "expediting high-level
confidential discussions that would embrace the governor's
political and public relations needs," according to the documents,
which were given to The New York Times by someone who wanted the
issue aired publicly.

 Governor Davis acknowledged the secret discussions in an interview
in San Francisco yesterday, and said he hoped to meet with more
generators soon. But he insisted that none of the companies would
escape a substantial payment because, he said, they have penalized
the state with excessive prices.

 "My general approach to the energy companies is that you have
already charged the utilities a 50 percent credit penalty for the
power they were buying from you," Mr. Davis said, so "you're going
to have to have a very substantial reduction" in what the companies
are owed.

 Mr. Davis said Duke had walked in with "a number of demands,"
including an end to state inquiries but that that was not likely to
happen.

 "We're not about to call off the dogs," said the governor, a
Democrat who will seek re-election next year.

 Duke, based in Charlotte, N.C., is a major investor in
California's wholesale electricity market, having spent more than
$1 billion since the state opened its generating plants to outside
operators in 1996.

 It is also near the top of the list of companies accused of
overcharging. Duke has been ordered by federal regulators to
justify or refund $20 million in disputed charges this year, an
amount that is third-highest among federally regulated companies in
the California market.

 By entering secret negotiations with Mr. Davis and being the first
generator to settle, Duke could gain a public-relations advantage,
in much the same way that the Liggett Group donned a white hat by
being the first company to open talks with the state governments in
the tobacco-litigation wars.

 "We've just simply tried to be part of the solution," Richard B.
Priory, Duke's chairman and chief executive, said in an interview,
adding that the company was "offering ideas" and "throwing in
suggestions."

 Publicly, Mr. Davis has disparaged out-of-state electricity
generators before and after he began talking with them privately.
In an interview two weeks ago with The Los Angeles Times, he called
the generators "the biggest snakes on the planet Earth" for their
pricing practices.

 California's electricity costs have risen to about $28 billion
last year from $7 billion in 1999. By some estimates, they could
approach $70 billion this year * $2,000 for every resident. The
state has stepped in to buy power for financially crippled
utilities, including Pacific Gas and Electric, which is now in
bankruptcy court.

 The Davis administration has struck power deals with companies
like Duke in hopes of securing a stable and affordable source of
power. To pay those bills, Mr. Davis is seeking the largest
municipal bond issue in American history, $12 billion, although
some state officials privately estimate that the final amount will
be higher.

 The governor hopes the bond issue will eventually take the state's
taxpayers off the hook. But how those costs are allocated among
ratepayers, utilities and generators, and whether the bond issue
can even succeed, remain unanswered questions. A major impediment
to resolving the electricity crisis, according to state officials,
utility executives and economists, is the secrecy surrounding the
administration's negotiations.

 Several Republicans have sued the Davis administration to learn
the terms of specific contracts entered into by the state. On
Monday, the administration released a 67-page financial analysis,
including its most detailed disclosure about the overall costs of
state electricity contracts. Last week Republicans blocked
legislation that Mr. Davis says he needs to pass the bond issue.
The bill could come up for a vote later this week.

 "The thing that has hindered Governor Davis the most among the
legislative ranks is the demand for secrecy over the negotiations
and the agreements that have been reached," said Senator Joseph L.
Dunn, a Democrat from Santa Ana and the chairman of a select
committee investigating the price spikes.

 Mr. Davis, in the interview, said there were legitimate commercial
reasons for keeping contract terms confidential.

 The political uncertainty has spilled over into the markets, where
the bonds would have to be sold. The state's credit rating, while
still solid, is slipping.

 Already companies that do business with California, like Duke, are
citing the state's creditworthiness as a reason for charging higher
prices in their dealing with the state, though the state has
stepped in as buyer since February.

 The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission recently ordered
generators to justify high prices in California this year or pay
$125 million in refunds. The companies * including Duke, Reliant
Energy, Dynegy Inc. and the Williams Company * deny any wrongdoing
and cite the state's credit situation as one reason for the high
prices.

 Mr. Priory, the Duke chairman, said that resolution of credit
issues would lead his company to drop the so-called "credit
premium" it now charges on power sales. As of March 7, Duke was
owed more than $100 million by the state's power managers,
documents show.

 In its confidential submission to Mr. Davis and his aides, Duke
said it would "forgive an appropriate amount of certain
receivables, or make an appropriate payment based upon a
methodology that fairly represents its share of alleged
overcharges."

 The documents do not give an amount, but Duke's 2000 annual report
shows that its wholesale energy division had written off $110
million for power sales to California that had not been collected.
(Even with that write-off, the unit's profits before taxes doubled
from 1999 to 2000, and quadrupled for the first quarter of this
year.)

 Duke's "preliminary global settlement template" of March 9 goes
on: "Duke is committed to sharing pain with state and others on a
fair and equitable basis, without admitting legal liability,
because Duke has done nothing illegal."

 Duke says that much of its California power was sold last year on
the forward markets, not the more volatile and higher-priced spot
markets. But Mr. Priory also noted in his interview that at least
10 percent was sold for "whatever the market price is."

 On March 23, Duke's lawyer, at the request of Mr. Davis's legal
affairs secretary, forwarded to the governor's office additional
information about pending litigation involving Duke and its power
sales in California. The documents show that a top Duke priority is
the "prompt suspension of state investigations, lowering of
rhetoric and stay of state litigation," as well as the withdrawal
of state-related claims at the federal energy commission.

 Also in March, the operators of the state's power grid told the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that wholesale electricity
prices in California were more than $6 billion above competitive
prices over the previous 10 months. Duke has questioned the
methodology of that submission and wants the claim withdrawn.

 The inquiries of concern to Duke include those being conducted by
the office of the attorney general, William Lockyer, and the
California Public Utilities Commission.

 Barry P. Goode, the governor's legal affairs secretary, says he
subsequently referred Duke's lawyer to the attorney general's
office. The two state agencies say that their inquiries are
continuing. Sandra Michioku, a spokeswoman for Mr. Lockyer, said,
"Our investigation is ongoing."

 Loretta Lynch, the president of the utility commission, said in a
telephone interview yesterday, "The public utilities commission has
not been involved in any settlement discussions with generators and
our investigations into overcharges and withholding are ongoing and
strong."

 The Duke documents say the company should be given preferential
treatment for its conciliatory stance.

 Other generators said they were not involved in settlement
discussions with Mr. Davis.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/02/national/02DAVI.html?ex=989822260&ei=1&en=70
3c8bd8125d53df

/-----------------------------------------------------------------\

Visit NYTimes.com for complete access to the
most authoritative news coverage on the Web,
updated throughout the day.

Become a member today! It's free!

http://www.nytimes.com?eta

\-----------------------------------------------------------------/

HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact Alyson
Racer at alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@nytimes.com.

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company


Start Date: 10/25/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102506.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/25/01
  UNIT_ID: CALGEN_1_UNITS


Shirley,

Did we renew it?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001
03:31 PM ---------------------------

Institutional Investor Journals <webinfo@iijournals.com> on 04/19/2001
11:03:59 AM
To: "vkamins@enron.com" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Continue Enjoying IIJournals -- Renew Today!

Dear Vince Kaminski,

We hope you are enjoying the benefits of receiving market-leading, rigorous
and current research from industry experts through your subscription to
DERIVATIVES QUARTERLY.

Unfortunately, your subscription is about to expire!  By renewing now, your
access to the web site and to your print copies will be uninterrupted.

You can continue to get the exclusive research and practical advice for
financial practitioners ) written by the best minds in your business!

Click here to Renew Today
http://www.iijournals.com/account/myaccount.asp

Thank you.


As I alluded to in my note yesterday, Enron has received a commitment for $1 billion in additional credit from our agent banks. This is great news, more from a market perception standpoint than an actual cash need. You can be assured that senior management is totally focused on the need to shore up the balance sheet with additional equity, now that we have the debt in place, but the equity we be a longer process.

In the meantime, lets get back to work. I would encourage people to talk to their supervisors about this situation if you feel "angst".

Rick


Start Date: 12/15/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121506.txt


Christi --

I am comfortable with trying to settle.  I hate that this new Commission has to litigate this case.  It is important, however, that we focus FERC staff on the broader policy changes necessary throughout the industry and not just on Entergy's tariff.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From:	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Thu 9/6/2001 2:06 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Presto, Kevin M.; Shapiro, Richard
Cc:
Subject:	Enron v. FERC appeal at DC federal court (Entergy source and sink)

The mediator in our appeal of the Entergy source and sink suggested that Enron may want to try and settle this.  I asked B&P for the costs to get through oral argument, which are only $4000.  During the course of our SE RTO mediation, the Entergy person working on congestion management agreed with me that implementation of the LMP/financial rights model in the SE would alleviate the need for the Entergy Attachment M and Southern's similar attachment.  However, that model (should we get it) won't be in effect until sometime next year (at the earliest).  Also, Enron has sold its control areas. (VEPCO, our co-appellant, still has Batesville in Entergy).

It seems that it would make sense for us to approach FERC staff working on this matter, get their thoughts, and then perhaps approach Entergy.  FERC is the one that would actually settle, not Entergy (also, FERC must change the policy -- getting Entergy to simply withdraw Att. M is certainly good for precedent, but Southern can still keep its Att. unless FERC makes Southern change its tariff).  If nothing else, having another FERC avenue to voice our support for the LMP financial rights model (no day ahead balanced schedules), which alleviates this discriminatory practice like Entergy Att. M, would be helpful.  What are your thoughts?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacqueline Java [mailto:jjava@bracepatt.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 6:37 PM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject: Costs associated with the Enron v. FERC matter

Christi -

Dan has informed me that Enron's share of remaining costs in the Enron v. FERC matter will not exceed $4,000, for the work done to prepare for oral argument scheduled for November 7, 2001.

If you need a more formal document indicating this, I would be happy to send one to you.  Please let me know.  Thanks.

Jackie

Jacqueline R. Java
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
2000 K Street, N.W. Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20006-1872
(202) 828-5828


fyi
-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:35 PM
To: 'DeBerry, Jeremiah A.'
Subject: RE: Montana Megawatts I, LLC

Yes, but since we signed the power it seemed that someone else would actually execute the certificate. By the way, it was certificate #2, so I changed the language in the power to reflect that.

-----Original Message-----
From: DeBerry, Jeremiah A. [mailto:JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:33 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Subject: RE: Montana Megawatts I, LLC

Thanks Kay.  I will check in again with Liz Evans at NorthWestern on the status of the Payment.  Were you able to locate the Certificate?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay [mailto:Kay.Mann@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:28 PM
To: DeBerry, Jeremiah A.
Subject: RE: Montana Megawatts I, LLC

Last time I checked I was told that the wire was in the queue.

Kay

-----Original Message-----
From: DeBerry, Jeremiah A. [mailto:JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:25 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Subject: Montana Megawatts I, LLC

Kay,  as you know, today is the "Call Closing"  pursuant to which Enron is required to (i) deliver to NorthWestern the Membership Certificate evidencing Enron's 20%  interest in Montana Megawatts I, LLC ("MMI") along with an executed membership interest power (collectively, the "Certificate") and (ii) pay to MMI $5,065,607 (the "Payment").  As of 4:00 pm EST, NorthWestern/MMI has not recieved the Certificate or the Payment.

Please let me know when NorthWestern/MMI should expect to receive of the Certificate and the Payment.

Thanks.
************************************************
Jeremiah A. DeBerry, Esq.
Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker LLP
399 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Phone: (212) 318-6458
Fax:     (212) 230-7754

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 11/27/01 16:25:34
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
==============================================================================

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers.

For additional information on Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, please see our website at paulhastings.com. To send an e-mail to our attorneys, in most cases, our address is composed of conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com. Here are two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com. A directory of our attorneys and a link to their e-mail address is located at the website. If you have any questions, please contact us at info@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 11/27/01 16:33:05
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
==============================================================================

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers.

For additional information on Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, please see our website at paulhastings.com. To send an e-mail to our attorneys, in most cases, our address is composed of conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com. Here are two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com. A directory of our attorneys and a link to their e-mail address is located at the website. If you have any questions, please contact us at info@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================


Culpepper and Anderson for Toomer, Autry, and Mcnabb


Hi Terri:

I'll be glad to add you to the email list.  Thanks for letting us know.

   Maureen McVicker
   Steve Kean's Asst.

"Hamby, Terri" <Terri.Hamby@ElPaso.com> on 05/17/2001 08:52:56 AM
To: "'Skean@enron.com'" <Skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Conf Call...

Mr. Kean, please add my name/email address to your distribution list.  I am
John Harrison's assitant. (I am afraid he might have missed a call or two.)

Thanks a bunch!

Terri.Hamby@elpaso.com

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

TRANSACTION DEVELOPMENT
Transaction Development, headed by Rodney Malcolm, works with Pulp & Paper,
Lumber and Steel to structure and execute some of the more complex deals.
Members of the Transaction Development team have a strong track record of
closing structured transactions involving both capital and commodity risks.
Sample deals would include working on the acquisition of Garden State Paper
earlier this year, and structuring and pitching the first all requirements,
index based, physical steel supply contract to one of the largest players in
the steel servicing segment of the steel industry.

The ability to buy and sell physical product will be critical to creating a
commodity product in these businesses.  Getting access to the physical
product will require creating compelling financing structures, as well as
potentially buying assets to get control of their production capability.  In
all these situations, the Transaction Development team will be a key player
in driving these opportunities to closure.

PEP - REVIEWER FEEDBACK DEADLINE
The Year End 2000 Performance Review Process closes November 17. To access
PEP, go to http://pep.corp.enron.com.  To avoid system delays, please log-on
before the deadline.

If you have any problems accessing the system or have any questions regarding
the Performance Management Process, please call the HR Helpdesk at x3.4040
option 4 or email pep.enquiries@enron.com.

OPEN ENROLLMENT 2001
The final date for making your 2001 benefit elections or changes is November
15, 8:00 am CST to 5:00 pm CST.  Remember, that your current 2000 health
benefit elections will rollover for 2001 if you do not make any changes.

Log-on to www.enron.benefitsnow.com or call 1-800-425-5864.

WELCOME

New Hires ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Tamara Carter/Gas Logistics, Albert Escamilla/Global Counterparty,
Michael Girraratano/Gas Assets Operations, Cassandra Mayeux/Reporting,
Planning Accounting, Christina Perez/Power Plant Acct., Eve Puckett/Info &
Records Management, Tracey Wood/Gas Logistics

EGM ) David Hoog/GRM Risk Products, Judy/Currency Trading

SAVE THE DATE

ENA/EIM/EGM-HOLIDAY PARTY
Enron Field
Saturday, December 9
7:00 pm - Midnight

NUGGETS & NOTES

"Bigger, faster" - Dave Delainey/CEO-ENA

"Four bid at five. What do you want to do?" John Arnold, Vice
President-Financial/Nymex Trading

"We trade weather."  Gary Taylor, Manager - Weather Risk Management Group
"You trade WHAT?!" anyone Gary speaks with.

LEGAL STUFF

The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed outside of Enron.


Reservation status has changed to CONFIRMED. See attachment.

ASSIGNMENT_REF = 30981
SELLER_CODE = AZPS
SELLER_DUNS = 958982563
CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI
CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276
AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0
PATH_NAME = W/AZPS/AZPS-AZPS/FOURCORNE345 - PNPKAPS230//
POINT_OF_RECEIPT = FOURCORNE345
POINT_OF_DELIVERY = PNPKAPS230
SOURCE = FOURCORNERS
SINK = PNPK
CAPACITY = 25
CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 25
SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY
TS_CLASS = FIRM
TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT
TS_PERIOD = OFF_PEAK
TS_WINDOW = FIXED
TS_SUBCLASS = WHEEL
NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1
OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default
START_TIME = 06/26/2002
STOP_TIME = 06/26/2002
CEILING_PRICE = 3.13
OFFER_PRICE = 3.13
BID_PRICE = 3.13
PRICE_UNITS = $/mW
PRECONFIRMED = YES
ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A
ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A
POSTING_REF = 0
SALE_REF =
REQUEST_REF =
DEAL_REF =
NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG =
STATUS = CONFIRMED
STATUS_NOTIFICATION = lisa.gang@enron.com
STATUS_COMMENTS =
TIME_QUEUED = 06/25/2002
RESPONSE_TIME_LIMIT =
TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 06/25/2002
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_COMMENTS =
CUSTOMER_COMMENTS = For info call (503)464-5070
SELLER_NAME = AZPS
SELLER_PHONE = 602.250.1128
SELLER_FAX = 602.250.1155
SELLER_EMAIL = oasisadm@apsc.com
CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801
CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272
CUSTOMER_EMAIL = bill.rust@enron.com
REASSIGNED_REF = 0
REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0
REASSIGNED_START_TIME =
REASSIGNED_STOP_TIME =


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 10:25
AM ---------------------------

Robert Superty
10/20/2000 10:30 AM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: [Fwd: real debate?]

Randy, my oldest son forwarded this to me and based on our political
discussions at lunch the other day I thought you would enjoy it.

Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Superty/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000
10:20 AM ---------------------------

Rob Superty <superty@fas.harvard.edu> on 10/19/2000 09:53:55 PM
To: robsup18@aol.com, pjmosquito@aol.com, n64lax14@aol.com,
bobsuperty@earthink.net, Robert.Superty@enron.com
cc:
Subject: [Fwd: real debate?]

Read this, guys..it's really funny.? The format isn't exactly pretty, but
you'll be able to figure it out:
?

The Real Debate

Jim Lehrer:???? Welcome to the second presidential debate between Vice
President Al Gore and Gov. George W. Bush. The candidates have agreed on
these rules:? I will ask a question. The candidate will ignore the question
and deliver rehearsed remarks
designed to appeal to undecided women voters.
The opponent will then have one minute to respond by trying to frighten
senior citizens into voting for him.
When a speaker's time has expired, I will whimper softly while he
continues
to spew incomprehensible statistics for three more minutes.

Let's start with the vice president. Mr. Gore, can you give us the name
of
a downtrodden citizen and then tell us his or her story in a way that
strains the bounds of common sense?

Gore:??????????? As I was saying to Tipper last night after we tenderly
made???????????? love the way we have so often during the 30 years of
our
rock-solid marriage, the downtrodden have a clear choice in this
election.
My opponent wants to cut taxes for the richest 1 percent of Americans.

I, on the other hand, want to put the richest 1 percent in an iron clad
lock box so they can't hurt old people like Roberta Frampinhamper, who
is
here tonight. Mrs. Frampinhamperhas been selling her internal organs,
one
by one, to pay for gas so that she can travel to these debates and
personify problems for me.

Also, her poodle has arthritis.

Lehrer:??? Gov. Bush, your rebuttal.

Bush:???? Governors are on the front lines every day, hugging people,
crying with them, relieving suffering anywhere a photo opportunity
exists.? I want to empower those crying people to make their own
decisions,
unlike my opponent, whose mother is not Barbara Bush.

Lehrer:??? Let's turn to foreign affairs. Gov. Bush, if Slobodan
Milosevic
were to launch a bid to return to power in Yugoslavia, would you be able
to
pronounce his name?

Bush:??????? The current administration had eight years to deal with
that
guy and didn't get it done. If I'm elected, the first thing I would do
about that guy is have Dick Cheney confer with our allies. And then Dick
would present me several options for dealing with that guy. And then
Dick
would tell me which one to choose.

You know, as governor of Texas, I have to make tough foreign policy
decisions every day about how we're going to deal with New Mexico.

Lehrer:??? Mr. Gore, your rebuttal.

Gore:??????? Foreign policy is something I've always been keenly
interested
in. I served my country in Vietnam. I had an uncle who was a victim of
poison gas in World War I.? I myself lost a leg in the Franco-Prussian
War.
And when that war was over, I came home and tenderly made love to Tipper
in
a way that any undecided woman voter would find romantic.

If I'm entrusted with the office of president, I pledge to deal
knowledgeably with any threat, foreign or domestic, by putting it in an
iron clad lock box.

Because the American people deserve a president who can comfort them
with
simple metaphors.

Lehrer:??? Vice President Gore, how would you reform the Social Security
system?

Gore:??????? It's a vital issue, Jim. That's why Joe Lieberman and I
have
proposed changing the laws of mathematics to allow us to give $50,000 to
every senior citizen without having it cost the federal treasury a
single
penny until the year 2250. In addition, my budget commits $60 trillion
over
the next 10 years to guarantee that all senior citizens can have drugs
delivered free to their homes every Monday by a federal employee who
will
also help them with the child-proof cap.

Lehrer:??? Gov. Bush?

Bush:??????? That's fuzzy math. I know, because as governor of Texas, I
have to do math every day. I have to add up the numbers and decide
whether
I'm going to fill potholes out on Rt. 36 east of Abilene or commit funds
to
reroof the sheep barn at the Texas state fairgrounds.

Lehrer:??? It's time for closing statements.

Gore:??????? I'm my own man. I may not be the most exciting politician,
but
I will fight for the working families of America, in addition to turning
the White House into a lusty pit of marital love for Tipper and me.

Bush:??????? It's time to put aside the partisanship of the past by
electing no one but Republicans.

Lehrer:??? Good night.
?
?
Return-Path: <rjbell@fas.harvard.edu>
Received: from [140.247.185.51] (roam185-51.student.harvard.edu
[140.247.185.51]) by smtp4.fas.harvard.edu with ESMTP id MAA10898
X-Sender: rjbell@pop.fas.harvard.edu
Message-Id: <v04003a18b613817c35ae@[140.247.185.51]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:34:31 -0400
To: Holmes 3rd residents:;
From: rick bell <rjbell@fas.harvard.edu>
Subject: real debate?
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

>The Real Debate
>
>
>Jim Lehrer:     Welcome to the second presidential debate between Vice
>President Al Gore and Gov. George W. Bush. The candidates have agreed on
>these rules:
>I will ask a question.
>The candidate will ignore the question and deliver rehearsed remarks
>designed to appeal to undecided women voters.
>The opponent will then have one minute to respond by trying to frighten
>senior citizens into voting for him.
>When a speaker's time has expired, I will whimper softly while he
>continues
>to spew incomprehensible statistics for three more minutes.
>
>Let's start with the vice president. Mr. Gore, can you give us the name
>of
>a downtrodden citizen and then tell us his or her story in a way that
>strains the bounds of common sense?
>
>Gore:            As I was saying to Tipper last night after we tenderly
>made             love the way we have so often during the 30 years of
>our
>rock-solid marriage, the downtrodden have a clear choice in this
>election.
>My opponent wants to cut taxes for the richest 1 percent of Americans.
>
>I, on the other hand, want to put the richest 1 percent in an iron clad
>lock box so they can't hurt old people like Roberta Frampinhamper, who
>is
>here tonight. Mrs. Frampinhamperhas been selling her internal organs,
>one
>by one, to pay for gas so that she can travel to these debates and
>personify problems for me.
>
>Also, her poodle has arthritis.
>
>Lehrer:    Gov. Bush, your rebuttal.
>
>Bush:     Governors are on the front lines every day, hugging people,
>crying with them, relieving suffering anywhere a photo opportunity
>exists.  I want to empower those crying people to make their own
>decisions,
>unlike my opponent, whose mother is not Barbara Bush.
>
>Lehrer:    Let's turn to foreign affairs. Gov. Bush, if Slobodan
>Milosevic
>were to launch a bid to return to power in Yugoslavia, would you be able
>to
>pronounce his name?
>
>Bush:        The current administration had eight years to deal with
>that
>guy and didn't get it done. If I'm elected, the first thing I would do
>about that guy is have Dick Cheney confer with our allies. And then Dick
>would present me several options for dealing with that guy. And then
>Dick
>would tell me which one to choose.
>
>You know, as governor of Texas, I have to make tough foreign policy
>decisions every day about how we're going to deal with New Mexico.
>
>Lehrer:    Mr. Gore, your rebuttal.
>
>Gore:        Foreign policy is something I've always been keenly
>interested
>in. I served my country in Vietnam. I had an uncle who was a victim of
>poison gas in World War I.  I myself lost a leg in the Franco-Prussian
>War.
>And when that war was over, I came home and tenderly made love to Tipper
>in
>a way that any undecided woman voter would find romantic.
>
>If I'm entrusted with the office of president, I pledge to deal
>knowledgeably with any threat, foreign or domestic, by putting it in an
>iron clad lock box.
>
>Because the American people deserve a president who can comfort them
>with
>simple metaphors.
>
>Lehrer:    Vice President Gore, how would you reform the Social Security
>system?
>
>Gore:        It's a vital issue, Jim. That's why Joe Lieberman and I
>have
>proposed changing the laws of mathematics to allow us to give $50,000 to
>every senior citizen without having it cost the federal treasury a
>single
>penny until the year 2250. In addition, my budget commits $60 trillion
>over
>the next 10 years to guarantee that all senior citizens can have drugs
>delivered free to their homes every Monday by a federal employee who
>will
>also help them with the child-proof cap.
>
>Lehrer:    Gov. Bush?
>
>Bush:        That's fuzzy math. I know, because as governor of Texas, I
>have to do math every day. I have to add up the numbers and decide
>whether
>I'm going to fill potholes out on Rt. 36 east of Abilene or commit funds
>to
>reroof the sheep barn at the Texas state fairgrounds.
>
>Lehrer:    It's time for closing statements.
>
>Gore:        I'm my own man. I may not be the most exciting politician,
>but
>I will fight for the working families of America, in addition to turning
>the White House into a lusty pit of marital love for Tipper and me.
>
>Bush:        It's time to put aside the partisanship of the past by
>electing no one but Republicans.
>
>Lehrer:    Good night.


The latest changes to the Interactive Open Season application have been moved
into production and are ready for testing.  These modifications include:

Displaying the actual bids along with the evaluated bids on each of the
detail lines.  This will allow shippers to see the actual bid rate for all
bids greater than max rate.
Calculating the winning bids based on evaluated bid and term only (ignore
time entered).  A " * " in the first column now means that the bid is a
potential winner, not an actual winner.
Forcing shippers to bid on the full volume of the package.

The modifications do not include:

Allowing users to supersede any of their own bids greater than or equal to
max rate.  Because this modification introduces a high risk factor, it will
be made after Fiday's IOS.

Because some of these modifications affect the way in which bids are ranked,
thorough testing by the Marketing team should be completed before any
shippers are allowed to enter the system.


Mark:  Do you have time this afternoon or tomorrow morning to discuss this
with me?   THanks, Lisa

	James D Steffes
	06/07/2001 12:34 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris
Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC Staff Concerns on the Gas Side

See end of first paragraph.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 06/07/2001
12:33 PM ---------------------------
From: Joe Hartsoe on 06/07/2001 12:26 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stanley Horton/Enron@EnronXGate, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Shelley
Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Drew Fossum/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray Neppl/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert
Kilmer/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: FERC Staff Concerns on the Gas Side

Folks --

Had a good discussion with a Senior Staff member at FERC in preparation for
the Pipelines Outreach meeting next week.  He told me that the two issues on
the gas side that are of primary concern to the Commission are 1) Marketing
Affiliates and potential abuse on the pipelines (Think El Paso); and 2) the
failure of CFTC and/or SEC to more closely oversee derivative trading.

Apparently, staff is considering whether to ban all transactions by marketers
on an affiliated pipeline, and some form of filing/reporting requirement to
better understand the derivative market.  Due to a lack of information, some
at FERC are assuming the worst.

I believe these proposals are in the formative stage and have not been
presented to Senior Staff or Commissioners as a recommendation.  I think
Staff would appreciate some information (ammo) to refute the need to further
regulate marketing affiliates or delve into derivative trading.

INGAA filed comments and a study concerning Marketers' use of affiliated
pipelines in response to the Marketing Affiliate Conference at FERC.  These
are attached.   Staff questions whether the underlying information remains
accurate.  We are considering whether to update the underlying information
used in the INGAA Study and how best to address these issues (probably during
Q&As) during the Staff Outreach.

I believe it would be helpful to put back together the coalition that Leslie
Lawner used at the last Market Affiliate conference to request a meeting as
part of the current Staff Outreach to discuss Staff's concerns.  In addition,
I think it would be helpful to request a separate ENRON meeting with Staff to
discuss how the derivative market works and why FERC does not need to
establish ongoing reporting requirements or otherwise become involved in
these markets.  Unfortunately, in this meeting we would probably be asked
about our involvement in the El Paso Merchant Transportation deal into
California, in light of Peggy Hegg's comment on the Frontline Show that El
Paso hedged some of the risk with Enron.

We can discuss further on Friday's call.  Later Joe


I suggest contacting Peggy Banzak for a contact in Mexico.  Michelle

	Fran L Mayes
	10/17/2000 12:28 PM

To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Stock Option Program

Please read the original email below.  Unfortunately I never responded -
however as I read through the material today, I am unable to answer any of
these questions.  Do we have a contact (outside counsel) who can provide
assistance.

Fran

---------------------- Forwarded by Fran L Mayes/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 12:29
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lina Jimenez @ ENRON                           10/17/2000 10:26 AM

To: fran.l.mayes@enron.com
cc: Tony Jarrett/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Stock Option Program

Fran:

What's the word on the tax summary for Mexico?  Has it been completed?  If
not, we are running up against a deadline so this task needs to be completed
as soon as possible.  If you have any questions, please call me at
713-853-9151.

Thanks.
Lina
---------------------- Forwarded by Lina Jimenez/Corp/Enron on 10/17/2000
10:21 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Lina Jimenez                           09/12/2000 10:21 AM

To: fran.l.mayes@enron.com
cc: Tony Jarrett/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Stock Option Program

Fran:

You should be aware that Enron Corp. will grant stock options to domestic and
some international employees.  Some employees in Mexico will be granted stock
options this year.  As a result, I must identify the treatment of stock
options in various countries.  Your name was provided by the Human Resources
representatives in charge with administering the EnronOptions program.

Attached you will find a series of questions regarding the taxation of stock
options.  I need you to provide answers to the short list of questions and to
verify those answers already supplied.  You may wish to contact outside tax
counsel in Mexico to assist you with these questions.  I ask that you
complete this task by October 1, 2000.

If you have any questions, please call me at 713-853-9151,

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Lina Jimenez


Ellen:

I've reviewed WestLB's optional early termination language which is similar
to the other's which I've reviewed (e.g., Goldman, Chase, Merrill, etc.).
Here's how it works for your 3/26/01 - 3/26/21 swap:

(1)  March 28, 2011 is the "Break Date" or "Early Termination Date".

(2)  Either party can give notice of early termination to the other party on
the day that is 5 NY Business Days prior to the Break Date.  By the way, this
is also the day on which the parties must mutually agree on 5 leading dealers
in the relevant market in case the valuation process in (3) below is later
disputed by the other party.

(3)  The party giving notice determines (in good faith) the Cash Settlement
Amount as of 11 a.m. NY time on the Break Date (which should be the
mid-market value of the deal on the Break Date.

(4)  Payment will occur on the Break Date.

(5)  I am adding a provision requiring the exercising party to notify the
other party on the day that is 3 NY Business Days prior to the Break Date.
There may be a dispute over the calculation and the parties will need to
resolve.

(6)  If the parties cannot agree on the Cash Settlement Amount calculation,
then the party who gave notice seeks mid-market quotes from the 5 leading
dealers (previously agreed to) at 11 a.m. on the day that is 2 NY Business
Days before the Break Date.  The confirm describes how the quotes are
averaged.  A minimum of 3 quotes is essential.  Payment is still made on the
Break Date.

George:

(1)  Please verify that the Break Date is 3/28/11.  My copy is a little fuzzy
and the date could actually be 3/26/11.

(2)  I've marked the confirm and faxed it to you.  Please note that:

 (a)  the second paragraph purports to incorporate the 1991 ISDA Definitions
but the master overrides this language because it incorporates the 1991
Definitions "as amended, modified, superceded or replaced from time to time"
(i.e., the 2000 ISDA Definitions).  There is a problem if  WestLB disagrees
because I've left some language in Paragraph 3 "as is" since it is based upon
the 2000 ISDA Definitions.

 (b)  no need to say that the Calculation Agent is "as otherwise stated in
the Agreement" because WestLB is stated to be the Calculation Agent in the
Agreement.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


I would agree.  I have just been trying to answer any question that are posed.  I just wanted to make sure that you were aware of this in case you were asked any questions.  Thanks.

Nancy A. Hetrick
Enron Corp.
Director, Government Affairs
Phone:  712-366-3399
Pager:   888-912-1426

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 7:15 AM
To: Hetrick, Nancy; Kingerski, Harry
Subject: RE: ERCOT LSE's

this is a fight we should avoid.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hetrick, Nancy
Sent: Wed 10/17/2001 5:59 AM
To: Kingerski, Harry; Steffes, James D.
Cc:
Subject: FW: ERCOT LSE's

FYI!  Please see the emails below.  I just wanted to let you know that this "political" battle within EES/EWS is brewing.  I have been providing support whenever I have been asked, e.g. answering questions, research, etc.  I will be in my office tomorrow if you would like to discuss or have any questions.  Otherwise you can page me today (I have meetings and flights, but I will call if I can.)  Thanks.

Nancy A. Hetrick
Enron Corp.
Director, Government Affairs
Phone:  712-366-3399
Pager:   888-912-1426

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Ader, Jeff
Sent:   Tuesday, October 16, 2001 12:21 PM
To:     Wagner, Joseph
Cc:     Delainey, David; Dietrich, Janet; Blachman, Jeremy; Holmes, Sean; Bernstein, Mark; Hetrick, Nancy; Herndon, Rogers; Ochsner, Preston

Subject:        Re: ERCOT LSE's

Joe,

I requested a meeting with you yesterday to work with you and convey what we have learned over the last three months by working with regulatory and the ERCOT ISO to utilize and create additional LSE accounts.  As you were informed by Nancy Hetrick of regulatory all three currently available LSE account are committed by Structured Supply for use under currently negotiated masters.  We requested the meeting with you yesterday to explain what we were doing and why we needed the other three EES LSE accounts.  We also took the time to explain the process for establishing new LSE accounts, under a LLC structure which is not complicated, but the structure that the new LSE accounts would be created under (SPV) is inconsistent with the masters negotiated and EES would not be able to perform under these masters.

We have tried to work with you in cooperation to accomplish your goals consistent with the constraints of the ERCOT rules.  We have explained our needs and the reason for them. We conveyed our interest in working together to accomplish the greater good for the company and offered our help in any way we could.  You mark and I agreed that it would be easier to help each other and not duplicate efforts.  We were appreciative of your willingness to proceed consistent with this spirit of cooperation.  It disheartens and surprises me that you would leave the meeting with this understanding and in agreement of the business situation and send an e-mail the next morning, without picking up the phone or stopping by to discuss this and just attempt to dictatorially commandeer the LSE accounts that you knew were committed and why they were committed.

Moreover; you told us that you thought you might need one more and you have attempted to take three more.

Best regards,

Jeff

From:   Joseph Wagner/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/16/2001 09:14 AM
To:     Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Ader/HOU/EES@EES
cc:     Nancy Hetrick/ENRON@enronXgate, Rogers Herndon/ENRON@enronXgate, Preston Ochsner/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject:        ERCOT LSE's

Thank you for taking the time to discuss the LSE situation in ERCOT.  The present LSE was set up by EES and is being utilized by EWS Retail and EWS Services Group, for physical delivery in ERCOT for EES load.  In order to better manage EES volume and structure growth in ERCOT, billing issues, and optimization of the present and future portfolio, EES/EWS Retail will require the use of the sub LSE's available under EES's existing LSE arrangement.  Structured Supply will be responsible for the creation of any LLC's that need to be created to facilitate additional LSE availability.  If you have any questions or comments, please either email or call me (ext 33143).  Thanks.

-Joe


Stinson,

I should be. I shall be driving back from Waco and barring
any emergency I shall join you.

Vince

Stinson Gibner
11/08/2000 05:16 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: John Wirick

Vince,

Are you available to go to dinner with John and his wife on next Tuesday?

--Stinson


Just to keep you in the loop.  I have not responed to any of these questions
yet.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000 08:09
AM ---------------------------

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/02/2000 03:16:25 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Questions about CES Capacity

try it again
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey Porter/CES/ColumbiaGas on
03/02/2000 04:12 PM ---------------------------

 Jeffrey Porter
 03/02/2000 04:10 PM

To: Chris Germany [SDCVM01.NAV0409]@LMSOV
cc:
Subject: Questions about CES Capacity

I have a few questions about CES Retail's firm capacity. I am trying to
determine what capacity CES had that was assigned to ENA, with contract
details. I combined a few spreadsheets but still have questions. Mostly I am
looking for some of the following; contract #, RP, DP, MDQ or term. Also not
sure if capacity K#s I have were CES's, then assigned or ENA's own. Can you
please assist?

1. TCO K#64651-is it CES' or ENA's? delivers to CMD4-25
2. TCO COH7-1, Exhibit 1 shows 20,000 of capacity for C&I. I have no details
on
this K.
3. TCO K#62164- I believe it delivers to COH7-4, but I have no details.
4. TCO K#65403- believe it delivers 19,000+ to BGE, but need all detail.
5.  CNG NORTH- K#'s 5A2291/5A2181 and 5A2292/5A2182; deliveries to NIMO, CES's
or ENA's?
6.  Have a bunch of contracts to TETCO M3, CES or ENA? see below

7.  TRANSCO Z5-Ex 1 shows 150 capacity, I have no details.
8.  TRANSCO Z6- for LILCO, is this released monthly to ENA?
9.   Texas Gas Z-4 to DP&L- monthly also?
10. Did CES have any ColGulf capacity that was assigned?

Call me if you have questions.
Jeff 703/561-6447


Geir,
I need to get a working cell phone number for you. I tried to reach you at home today regarding the postponement of our meeting. Please give me a call or send me an email with your contact info.
Thanks,
Bill


(See attached file: g051401.pdf)

______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis
a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous
recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute
diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS
(et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message,
dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the
addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please
delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure,
either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS
(and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message
if modified.
______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________

 - g051401.pdf


FYI  This came out of the 9th work day meeting.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Acton/Corp/Enron on 04/19/2000 07:16
AM ---------------------------

Vance L Taylor@ECT
04/18/2000 07:36 PM
To: Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Texas Nom, LP dba Garrison, Ltd

Tom please create a sitara ticket based on the following information:

Counterparty   Meter   Volumes  Price    Period

Texas Nom, LP(dba
        Garrison, Ltd.)  9656   500mmbtu/d  100% IF/HSC less $0.10  4/1 - 4/30

---------------------- Forwarded by Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2000
04:56 PM ---------------------------

Vance L Taylor
04/05/2000 04:21 PM
To: Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Texas Nom, LP dba Garrison, Ltd

Tom,

The following production commenced to flow on last week and a ticket should
be created and entered into sitara based on the following:

Counterparty   Meter   Volumes  Price   Period

Texas Nom, LP(dba
        Garrison, Ltd.)  9656   500mmbtu/d  100% GD less $0.10 3/27 - 3/31

Susan will create a committed reserves firm ticket for the remaining term of
the deal once our geologists have gathered enough data to forecast the
reserves of this well; at such time, this ticket should be zeroed out.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353


I checked with Rick Buy's group on where they were on The RAROC analysis of
your proposed broadband project.  They aren't doing anything according to Rod
who checked for me.  It seems to me that we need to do several things to
either kick this into gear or to put it on hold pending completion of a
sale.

1.  We need to find out from Mark Metts if this deal adds any value to the
transactions being proposed.  I will talk with Mitch and Mark about this
issue.
2.  We need to determine EBS interest in this business..ie are they a buyer
or seller of Portland metro dark fiber.  If they want to be in this business
wouldn't it make to develop this project as EBS and not to include it in a
sale?
3.  A project of this size will take Jeff's approval.  The projected Phase I
capital is above my threshold.

I will talk with Kevin Hannon and Mitch and then get back with you.  Sound
like a plan?


Dan,

I work for Tom Martin on the Texas Gas Trading Desk and he has some questions
on EOL "Force Majeure" language.  Specifically, we buy/sell gas at the Exxon
Katy Plant and were wondering the "Force Majeure" ramifications of the the
Plant closing due to freeze-offs, i.e. can we claim Force Majeure in that
instance and what remedies are provided for in the EOL contract language?
Additionally, we buy/sell gas at HPL pooling points such as Agua Dulce Pool
and were curious about the Force Majeure provisions and remedies for these
pooling zones.

I do not know if you are the right person to contact regarding this
information, but if you can provide any insight I would greatly appreciate it.

Thanks in advance.

Sincerely,

Eric Bass
x3-0977


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Personal Appointment

Date:		1/31/2001
Time:		6:00 PM - 7:20 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Sell hour ending 6 only- 30 mw's for Frontera tomorrow.   DO NOT GO TO THE POOL .
If you cannot sell the mw's for a reasonable price ($0 or greater) and the pool appears to be going to a negative,   call Jerry and wake him up.   Have him ramp up starting he 7.
Try to sell tonite if possible,  so we wont have to wake them up.

I have sold the swap to Frontera for tomorrow.

They will be short the following hours:

he 7 - 370
he 8 - 265
he 9 - 200
he 10 - 50

I have sold the swap to them at $24.50.   I sell fixed and buy floating.       If you think that the pool will be high,  then you buy fixed and take to the pool.
You will buy fixed and sell floating.    Net,  we are left with two fixed prices.  Very cool.

Ercot will be calling due to the ACE issue.   The plant will be coming up slowly.

Call if you have questions,

JMF


The FINAL Violation Memos for 11/20/01 have been published and are available for viewing on the ERV: http:\\erv.corp.enron.com - Violation/Notification Memo Section.


I believe its Elite Brokers Inc. but I'm checking on it.  I'll have an answer
in the morning.

thanks,

Dan

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 5:12 PM
To: Diamond, Daniel
Subject: Re: NDA Elite Brokers

Danm that doesn't sound like a full legal name...?

	Daniel Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate 04/30/2001 03:03 PM 	   To: Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc: Bob Shults/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: NDA Elite Brokers

Tana,
Please send an NDA (re-broker client) to:

Tony Poolcastro
10333 Harwin, Suite  330
Houston, Texas  77036
tonyp@elite.net
713-484-7126

Thanks,

Dan


We'll need to discuss further internally, but they may be correct in their
assessment.

Best,
Jeff

	Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
	02/16/2001 07:03 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: UC/CSU issue - SB - 27X

From further discussions with UC/CSU, it appears their primary concern
relative to Enron's decision to De-DASR their accounts is that they have lost
their "direct access" status, and are again a bundled utility customer.

Jeff - what impacts does this status have with respect to the ban language of
AB-1X?  And with SB-27X, will they now encumber costs to become a direct
access customer that they would not have been liable for had Enron not made
the decision to return them to utility supply?

Your input is appreciated.  Please shed some light here as soon as possible.

Regards - Tom Riley


In 1925 Houston Pipe Line Company was formed to fuel a growing Houston
economy.  Over the past 75 years, we have expanded our physical network
across the Texas Gulf Coast, and we now offer a wide range of financial,
commodity and risk management services.    HPL is the largest single supplier
of gas to Entex and is one of the most flexible intrastate pipeline systems
in the country due to our 118 Bcf Bammel Storage field.

To celebrate our 75th birthday, I am pleased to invite HPL employees and
their spouse or guest to a company-sponsored event on Saturday the 9th of
September at Moody Gardens in Galveston, Texas.  The attached invitation
provides the details.  Additional information will be sent to you over the
summer.  Please mark your calendars with this date, and I look forward to
seeing you there.

Sincerely,

Brian Redmond
President - HPL