Yes, please.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brownfeld, Gail
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:13 PM
To: Sanders, Richard B.
Subject: FW: Foster Wheeler suggested language for delay damages

Let me know if you'd like me to handle the Pain Creek matter.  Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lund, David
Sent: Mon 9/10/2001 4:31 PM
To: Brownfeld, Gail; Millie.Hewes@nepco.com
Cc: Sanders, Richard B.
Subject: RE: Foster Wheeler suggested language for delay damages

Of course Gail.  I'm sorry you didn't get a copy sooner.

Millie,  Please make a copy of the arbitration demand and our response that
Seth Price submitted on our behalf.  This is entitled "Foster Wheeler
Limited vs. NEPCO"  Please fax or overnight mail the copy to Gail Brownfeld
at Enron, EWS.  Go to the Enron web site (People Finder) to locate her
mailing address.  Thanks.

By copy to Richard Sanders, I left a voice message last week with you
describing a new matter we are developing as a claim against Overland
Construction, Inc. (a subsidiary of Black and Veatch) on a project called
"Payne Creek", located in central Florida.  Considering the losses suffered
to date ($7 Million) the project is now spelled "Pain Creek".  I spoke to
Schwartzenburg about it and he suggested we enlist your group for
assistance.  I have also retained Seth Price's firm (with Derrick's
approval) to help evaluate and develop the claim.  I would like to schedule
a conference call with Seth, myself and a member of your group to review the
claim.  Schwartzenburg and myself are available on Thursday, September 13th
and so is Seth but only in the morning.  Given the time zone differences
between Seth and myself, I would like to target 11:00 AM central time.  Let
me know if Gail or someone else will be the assigned attorney.  The claim
involves construction cost overruns due to errors in the owners
specification.

Thanks.

David H. Lund, Jr.
Assistant General Counsel
National Energy Production Corporation
11831 North Creek Parkway N.
Bothell, WA 98011
425-415-3138
Fax: 425-415-3032
David.Lund@nepco.com or davidlu@nepco.com

                -----Original Message-----
                From:   Brownfeld, Gail [ <mailto:Gail.Brownfeld@ENRON.com>]
                Sent:   Monday, September 10, 2001 10:34 AM
                To:     Lund, David
                Cc:     Sanders, Richard B.
                Subject:        RE: Foster Wheeler suggested language for
delay damages

                David,
                        Sorry for the phone tag of last week. The reason I
was calling
                actually related to the attached.Can I get a copy of the
file on this
                and also can we schedule a call with outside counsel to
discuss this
                matter?  Apparently, life at EWS in not that different from
EI and as
                the trusty litigation manager, I need to be involved in
this.  To the
                extent that I have suggested a call on Wednesday to discuss
the Pakistan
                case, maybe you and I can arrange something with Seth to
occur before or
                after that call.  It would be helpful to have what was filed
beforehand,
                if it could be arranged. Thanks in advance.

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Lund, David
                Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 2:18 PM
                To: Brownfeld, Gail
                Subject: RE: Foster Wheeler suggested language for delay
damages

                Yes, against NEPCO.  We have retained Seth Price of Shapiro
Fussell in
                Atlanta.  I have Derrick's approval.  The action was
delivered two weeks
                ago
                and then put on hold.  After the unsuccessful settlement
meeting, it was
                ignited again.  Seth will issue our response on Tuesday
(9/4).  Seth has
                worked on NEPCO matters before and is familiar with our
business
                practices
                and contract terms with suppliers.

                This is rather new matter and I didn't have the opportunity
to involve
                you
                earlier.

                David H. Lund, Jr.
                Assistant General Counsel
                National Energy Production Corporation
                11831 North Creek Parkway N.
                Bothell, WA 98011
                425-415-3138
                Fax: 425-415-3032
                David.Lund@nepco.com or davidlu@nepco.com

                                -----Original Message-----
                                From:   Brownfeld, Gail
                [ <mailto:Gail.Brownfeld@ENRON.com>]
                                Sent:   Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:46 AM
                                To:     Lund, David; Schwartzenburg, John
                                Subject:        RE: Foster Wheeler suggested
language
                for
                delay damages

                                Dave,
                                        Was the arbitration initiated
against NEPCO?  If
                so,
                who has
                                been retained to handle it?

                                -----Original Message-----
                                From: Lund, David
                                Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:30 PM
                                To: Schwartzenburg, John
                                Cc: Brownfeld, Gail
                                Subject: FW: Foster Wheeler suggested
language for delay
                damages

                                This is a heads up to a mounting dispute
with a major
                equipment
                                supplier,
                                Foster Wheeler Limited (HRSG supplier).
Currently they
                have
                initiated
                                an
                                arbitration action before the AAA here in
Seattle for a
                payment claim
                                ($1.2
                                M) on the Linden, NJ project of which we
have held back
                payment to
                                satisfy
                                our claim for delay LDs and re-work ($3.8
M).  While
                this
                action is
                                pending,
                                FWL has initiated some unlawful bargaining
tactics on
                our
                Lakeworth, FL
                                project.  More of the drama is outlined
below.

                                No need for action here.

                                David H. Lund, Jr.
                                Assistant General Counsel
                                National Energy Production Corporation
                                11831 North Creek Parkway N.
                                Bothell, WA 98011
                                425-415-3138
                                Fax: 425-415-3032
                                David.Lund@nepco.com or davidlu@nepco.com

                                -----Original Message-----
                                From:   B-David Lund
                                Sent:   Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:03 PM
                                To:     B-Galen Torneby
                                Cc:     B-Bob Black; B-Don Campbell; B-Greg
Tardanico;
                B-Mike Ranz;
                                B-Daniel
                                Haas; B-David Hattery; 'Seth Price'
                                Subject:        RE: Foster Wheeler suggested
language
                for
                delay damages

                                ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION; PRIVELEGED
AND
                CONFIDENTIAL

                                Galen,

                                I don't have the full history of dealing on
this
                purchase
                order with
                                FWL,
                                but my instincts say we don't have to accept
"material"
                changes to the
                                terms
                                on the eve of signing a PO.  FWL's attempt
to adjust
                significant delay
                                risk
                                at the eleventh hour constitutes a breach of
good faith
                and
                fair
                                dealing.
                                It is as if we were to sign the PO based on
weeks of
                review
                of a firm
                                and
                                final price but mark down the price a few
million on the
                final draft
                                because
                                we felt we were taken to the cleaners on a
previous job
                they
                sold to us.
                                FWL needs to be instructed to accept the PO
without the
                proposed
                                changes.
                                If they refuse, we have (and we must tell
them) the
                choice
                to contract
                                with
                                another party and hold them liable for the
extra cost of
                another
                                supplier to
                                make the schedule required.  This liability
is based on
                breach of an
                                implied
                                contract and FWL faces damages for
detrimental reliance
                (that would be
                                the
                                incremental cost above FWL's firm price
charged by the
                replacement
                                vendor).
                                The reliance argument is that we excused
other bidders
                weeks
                ago and
                                chose
                                to exclusively deal with FWL based on
agreement
                (reliance)
                of terms and
                                conditions presented in earlier drafts of
the PO or
                referred
                to in
                                previous
                                PO documents.  The detriment argument is FWL
knew they
                had
                us captive to
                                them on this deal.  By going forward without
other
                bidders,
                we lost
                                price
                                protection and commitment for schedule by
other bidders,
                therefore we
                                are at
                                a detriment without market forces.  In the
best world,
                our
                purchasing
                                activities need to keep proposals
competitive by not
                dropping back to
                                one
                                supplier for critical path equipment.

                                I mentioned a choice here, the other choice
is to
                continue
                to deal with
                                FWL
                                and accept their additional terms because
the risk of
                changing horses
                                and
                                being successful on a lawsuit based on
implied contract
                and
                detrimental
                                reliance outweighs the risk and cost of
having to
                "mitigate"
                the effect
                                of
                                LDs on FWL if critical path work is not
impacted or hard
                to
                document and
                                prove it was impacted, and whether our
obligations were
                fulfilled in
                                this
                                respect.  Since FWL has now opened the door
to change
                "material" terms
                                on
                                the eve of signing, we have the opportunity
to do the
                same
                with them,
                                but
                                that doesn't help if the parties continue to
go in
                opposite
                directions
                                while
                                your end date stays the same.  I would say
they know
                this is
                a dilemma
                                to us
                                and are betting we will deal with them on
these new
                first-time
                                "material"
                                changes to the PO terms.  If we go with the
second
                choice, I
                would
                                encourage
                                NEPCO and Enron to take FWL off any
preferred bidders
                list.

                                In addition, I thought I heard from the
folks who
                attended
                the Linden 6
                                settlement meeting a week ago that the
parties said they
                would not let
                                the
                                litigation on Linden 6 effect our other
on-going deals.
                Apparently FWL
                                is
                                taking their issues on Linden 6 over to
other deals.  We
                may
                want to do
                                the
                                same.

                                Stepping back a bit, unless our documents
and witnesses
                are
                crystal
                                clear on
                                the implied contract theory and we have a
clear fact
                pattern
                for
                                detrimental
                                reliance, I wouldn't lick our chops and be
confident
                that we
                got them on
                                this liability.  I am willing to advance an
argument for
                posture
                                purposes in
                                order to force some conclusion on the PO
terms that they
                have attempted
                                to
                                open up.  And with what little I know thus
far, I would
                encourage we try
                                to
                                strike a deal in lieu of another lawsuit.

                                David H. Lund, Jr.
                                Assistant General Counsel
                                National Energy Production Corporation
                                11831 North Creek Parkway N.
                                Bothell, WA 98011
                                425-415-3138
                                Fax: 425-415-3032
                                David.Lund@nepco.com or davidlu@nepco.com

                                                -----Original Message-----
                                                From:   B-Galen Torneby
                                                Sent:   Wednesday, August
29, 2001 1:22
                PM
                                                To:     B-David Lund
                                                Cc:     B-Bob Black; B-Don
Campbell;
                B-Greg
                Tardanico;
                                B-Mike Ranz
                                                Subject:        Foster
Wheeler suggested
                language for
                                delay
                                damages

                                                 << File: mom-0822.doc >> <<
File:
                8&13.doc
                >> David,

                                                I am forwarding an email
from Mr. Garry
                Greatrix,
                                Project
                                Manager, Foster Wheeler Ltd.  Please read
the document
                attached entitled
                                8&13.doc.  This has been presented as
revised language
                to
                "all NEPCO
                                contracts" from Foster Wheeler.  This
suggested language
                has
                been
                                presented
                                as endorsed by Foster Wheeler legal and
executive
                management.  The FW
                                team
                                explained that this language resulted from
what they
                have
                experienced
                                with
                                NEPCO on recent projects, specifically
Linden 6 and
                Kendall
                and that
                                they
                                cannot sign the purchase contract without
it.

                                                Since this affects more than
the Lake
                Worth
                Project I
                                felt
                                any acceptance or dialog regarding FW's
suggested
                language
                would need to
                                be
                                reviewed and approved by NEPCO legal and
executive team.

                                                Galen J. Torneby
                                                Project Manager
                                                National Energy Production
Corporation
                (NEPCO)
                                                11831 North Creek Parkway
North
                                                Bothell,  WA  98011  USA

                                                Tel:   425-415-3052
                                                Cell:  425-922-0475
                                                Fax:  425-415-3098
                                                email:
<mailto:galen.torneby@nepco.com>
                                < <mailto:galen.torneby@nepco.com>>

                                                -----Original Message-----
                                                From: Greatrix, Garry
                [ <mailto:Garry_Greatrix@fwc.com>]
                                < <mailto:[mailto:Garry_Greatrix@fwc.com]>>
                                                Sent: Wednesday, August 29,
2001 6:47 AM
                                                To: Galen.Torneby@nepco.com
                                < <mailto:Galen.Torneby@nepco.com>>
                                ; Richard.Skibinski@nepco.com
                < <mailto:Richard.Skibinski@nepco.com>> ;
                                Martin.Tollefson@nepco.com
                < <mailto:Martin.Tollefson@nepco.com>> ;
                                dlabine@nepcan.com
< <mailto:dlabine@nepcan.com>> ;
                sketler@nepcan.com
                                < <mailto:sketler@nepcan.com>> ; ltoth@nepcan
                < <mailto:ltoth@nepcan>>  .com;
                                Don.Campbell@nepco.com
< <mailto:Don.Campbell@nepco.com>> ;
                Braid, Alan;
                                Kirk,
                                Bob; Baiton, Darren; Hildebrandt, Bob;
McKenna, Richard;
                Jonker, Chris;
                                Ratelle, Leo; Rajhans, Shekhar; Dueck, Rob;
Shaffer,
                Edward;
                McNinch,
                                Bob;
                                Jansen, Bruna; McDonald, Robin; Copsey, Dick
                                                Subject: NEPCO Lake Worth -
Minutes of
                Meeting - August
                                22,
                                2001

                                                     Please find attached
Minutes of our
                Project Design
                                Review Meeting
                                                at
                                                     NEPCAN offices
Wednesday August 22,
                2001.

                                                     Discussion and Action
items are as
                noted for
                                followup
                                by
                                                     NEPCO/NEPCAN/FW
accordingly.

                                                     Best regards,

                                                     Garry Greatrix
                                                     FW Project Manager

**********************************************************************
                                This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp.
and/or its
                relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and
privileged material
                for
                the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
                distribution or
                disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
the intended
                recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
please contact
                the
                sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
                enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
                and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
attachments
                hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance)
and do not
                create
                or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or
                any
                of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and
                may
                not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or
                otherwise. Thank you.

**********************************************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: Comnes, Alan
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 7:06 PM
To: Frank, Robert; Shapiro, Richard; Walton, Steve; Mara, Susan
Cc: Kean, Steven J.; Alvarez, Ray; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.
Subject: RE: Materials for Western Governors

Here's my piece on Westwide price caps.
[Comnes, Alan]

-----Original Message-----
From: Dernehl, Ginger On Behalf Of Shapiro, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:32 AM
To: Walton, Steve; Comnes, Alan; Frank, Robert; Mara, Susan
Cc: Kean, Steven J.
Subject: FW: Materials for Western Governors
Importance: High

Governor Jim Geringer of Wyoming is in the process of organizing a meeting between himself, 3-4 other western governors, and FERC Commissioner Pat Wood to discuss wholesale electricity issues facing the Western Power Market.  This meeting is expected to take place in the next couple of weeks.

In preparation of the meeting, Governor Geringer has requested information on the following issues which I would like each of you to provide me by next Tuesday, September 4th.

General Summary of the Western Power Market as it exists today - Steve Walton
A summary of Enron's position on the FERC RTO Model and the necessary components of a well-designed RTO - Steve Walton
A summary of FERC's Price Cap Order and the implications it has had on the West - Alan Comnes
An update of the Refund proceedings and next steps - Bob Frank
Summary of FERC's failure to go after California for failure to comply with FERC - Sue Mara
Update of CALISO issues - Sue Mara

Thank you


Here are the spreadsheets for the unfinaled invoices prior to May 2000.
Please notify me of any discrepancies.  We will send out unfinaled purchases
next week.

Thanks.


Start Date: 4/7/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Straight-up guy
straight forward
no axe to grind
well-liked

Troy is on board with committee position as stated on the conference call
this afternoon.

Lisa


see the attached spreadsheet.  respond with "enable macros" at the first
dialogue box and "no" to the second dialogue box.  go to the tab "peak by
region" and look at cell k15.  i have the print range set up already to print
peak, off-peak, and flat positions.


well i AM mad  that you are being such a jerk about it, and it makes me sure as hell that i  would rather go camping BY MYSELF than spend a weekend with  you.


****NEW -- priceline.com announces FREE long distance!*****
Get 60 FREE long distance minutes when you buy 60 minutes
or more.  That's one hour of long distance calling to
anywhere in the U.S., absolutely FREE! Click here now:
http://www.priceline.com/promo/buy60.asp
***********************************************************
Dear MATHEW D SMITH,

We have an answer for you regarding your hotel request!

Please click on the link below for all the details:
http://www.priceline.com/hotels/checkstatus/default.asp?id=32911210210

If you wish, you can also go to the priceline.com home page and select "Hotel Rooms" in the
"Check Previous Request" area to get your answer.  Use the hotel request number below to sign in.

Your Priceline Hotel Request Number:  32911210210

Thanks for using priceline.com!  If you have any trouble using the special link above,
please call us toll free at 1-800-657-9168 for assistance.

Sincerely,

priceline.com Customer Service

***************************************************************
Save up to 20% or more on your rental car! You'll get the
type of car you want with unlimited mileage from one of the
top 5 name-brand car rental companies. Click here now:
http://www.priceline.com/RentalCars/itinerary.asp

***************************************************************


As of 11:15 am, East Power has sold approx. 600-700 gas contracts and bought approx. 3 million Mwh's.


FYI, we need to talk about a presentation in the London office on Chinese
walls.  Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 12/08/99 10:10
AM ---------------------------

Michael R Brown
12/07/99 01:08 PM
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.

FYI
Michael
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael R Brown/LON/ECT on 07/12/99 19:07
---------------------------

	Enron Europe

	From:  John Sherriff                           07/12/99 15:10

Sent by: Enron Europe General Announcement
To: ECT Europe, Enron Executive Committee, Jay Fitzgerald/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monte L
Gleason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Ruane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick L
Carson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Petersen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.

We are pleased to announce the formation of the Credit Markets Group which is
responsible for developing innovative products to better manage the risk of
our internal credit portfolio as well as, looking  for opportunities to
provide third party credit protection.  Initially, we will be making markets
in bankruptcy protection on reference credits which are currently in our
portfolio but we expect to add additional credit products and reference
credits very quickly.

The team will utilise EnronOnline as its primary trade execution tool,
looking to quickly build market share by capturing the eyes of our current
counterparts.  Simultaneously,  we will launch an external web site focused
on credit protection where potential customers will have access to real time
prices and filter on specific reference credits as well as, access to credit
models and research papers on effective credit risk management.  Utilising
e-commerce business principles, we expect to aggressively claim the space for
corporate credit protection.  We expect to make a public announcement about
these new products in late January.

In order to effectively access the global market for credit protection, the
group will be based in London with an initial local desk set up in Houston as
well.  Bryan Seyfried will be transitioning out of RAC, where he was
responsible for the Trading Controls and Research teams in Europe, to lead
the group and he will report to me.


Please give me shout if you have any questions (39222)

Chao!


All of us are aware of the energy crisis confronting us, and the situation
might get a lot worse this summer.  PGE has taken actions to reduce energy
consumption, e.g., decreasing the amount of lighting within the building.

In the spirit of energy conservation, Chris Calger and I are asking that you
turn off your monitor(s) each day.  You do not need to log out of your
computers to do this--simply press the monitor off button.  If you have any
questions about how to turn off your monitor(s), check with Dave Steiner in
our IT Department.

Thanks for your cooperation.


need to know more. focused on trading? or assets? rick


Attached is the agreement in principle reached today between TCPL and its
Stakeholders on terms TCPL is prepared to bring to the board if there is
broad enough industry support.

The following are the key changes from the draft distributed on Monday Feb 12.
Discretionary revenue sharing  to TCPL subject to cap of $5M (from $7.5M)
with higher sharing percentages by revenue class.
AOS of 4% (from 2.5%) of FT demand charge paid as credit to IT invoice.  4%
is approx 240 mmcfd.
IT floor to be railed between 80% and 120% of FT toll but floating monthly
with marginal fuel cost.

There are two very controversial elements that may cause some parties to
litigate.  TCPL has slipped in the severance costs for 200 employees that
were laid off in Dec 2000 but technically terminated in 2001.  At $100K per
employee this works out to $20 m or about one cent on the Eastern Zone toll.
TCPL is also not willing to consider liquidating this year any of their 8 bcf
of storage working gas and are not even conceding that the gas belongs to the
shippers.  Speculation is they have arbed much of it  this winter and are
trying to pocket all of the upside with no benefit to the shippers who paid
for it.

If TCPL proceeds with this agreement without opposition then there will be a
cost of capital hearing to set the ROE and capital structure.  If they don't
then there will be a lengthy rate hearing where many time consuming issues
such as higher depreciation will be debated.  If TCPL proceeds with this deal
in the face of litigants (from the LDCs perhaps) it is unclear which issues
will be raised  or how long the hearing will take.

TCPL is requesting by close of business Tuesday that we indicate whether we
will either
a. sign the agreement or
b. neither sign nor litigate or
c. litigate to NEB.

I understand from discussion earlier this week with Jon McKay and Rob
Milnthorp that Enron will choose Option B.  We can review on Tuesday.  If
anybody wants clarification on anything let me know.

Kevin

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Heal/CAL/ECT on 02/16/2001 03:52 PM
---------------------------

"John Lee" <john_lee@transcanada.com> on 02/16/2001 03:43:56 PM
To: Steve Emond <steve_emond@transcanada.com>
cc: Rob Whitmore <rob_whitmore@transcanada.com>, Marg Seeger
<marg_seeger@transcanada.com>, John Guerriero <jguerriero@duke-energy.com>,
Debbie Harris <debbie_harris@transcanada.com>, Phi Dang
<PDang@gazoductqm.com>, Adam White <adam_white@transalta.com>, Albert
Stortchak <stortcal@est.gov.on.ca>, Bill Wible <bill_wible@iroquois.com>, Bob
Fraser <bobfraser@aec.ca>, Brian Howell <behowell@interlog.com>, Brian Ridley
<bridley@hydro.mb.ca>, Brian Troicuk <troicuk@capp.ca>, Brian White
<bswhite@ceg.com>, Brian Woods <brian_woods@email.mobil.com>, Cheryl Worthy
<worthycg@bp.com>, Chuck Baumgart <cbaumgart@renaissance.ca>, Debbie White
<debbwhit@marathoncanada.com>, Diane Cameron <diane_cameron@nexeninc.com>,
Doug Holgate <doug.holgate@husky-oil.com>, Frank Brennan
<frank.brennan@cgc.enbridge.com>, Gilles Favreau
<favreau.gilles@hydro.qc.ca>, Ken Hadley <ken_hadley@pcp.ca>, Kevin Heal
<kevin.heal@enron.com>, Kurt McKnight <kmcknight@uniongas.com>, Lisa McMahon
<lisa.mcmahon@neg.pge.com>, Lyne Mercier <lmercier@gazmet.com>, Martin
Imbleau <mimbleau@gazmet.com>, mike verwegen <mverwegen@uniongas.com>, Mike
Stedman <mstedman@uniongas.com>, Murray Samuel
<murray_samuel@transcanada.com>, Robert Agnello <ragnello@edisonmission.com>,
Robert Andrews <randrews@coral-energy.com>, Peter Fournier <igua@magma.ca>,
Ron Moore <ronald.moore@esso.com>, Ronald Richard
<ronald.richard@mrn.gouv.qc.ca>, Shonda Day <days@epenergy.com>, Suzanne
Boucher-Chen <suzanne.boucher-chen@southernenergy.com>, Vern Gorr
<vgorr@saskenergy.sk.ca>, Frederic Morel <fmorel@gazmet.com>, Isabelle Quach
<iquach@gazmet.com>, Robert Rowe <rob.rowe@cgc.enbridge.com>, Richard King
<rking@powerbudd.com>, Dan Collins <dacollins@negm.com>, Mike Lucy
<mslucy@negm.com>, Nick Schultz <schultz@capp.ca>, Howard Stephens
<hstephens@hydro.mb.ca>, Brent Moen <bmoen@hydro.mb.ca>, Jeremy Slasor
<jeremy.slasor@demloak.com>, Jim Fisher <jfisher@duke-energy.com>, Janet
Holder <janet.holder@cgc.enbridge.com>, Rob Hemstock <rhemsto@ect.enron.com>,
Aleck Dadson <adadson@ect.enron.com>, Normand Stevenson
<nstevenson@gazmet.com>, Randy Fryer <rfryer@northlandpower.com>, Alan Reid
<alan_reid@pcp.ca>, John MacPherson <macpher@petro-canada.ca>, Alain Lefebvre
<alain.lefebvre@mrn.gouv.qc.ca>, craigl <craigl@cnrl.com>, swong
<swong@northlandpower.com>, rinde_powell <rinde_powell@pcp.ca>, "ed.bruton"
<ed.bruton@neg.pge.com>, lnixon <lnixon@tmvgas.com>, "jill.page"
<jill.page@gov.ab.ca>, Max Feldman <max_feldman@transcanada.com>,
"bernard.kramer" <bernard.kramer@mcnenergy.com>, bartlon
<bartlon@epenergy.com>, sharon johnson <sharonej@telusplanet.net>, Jack Hawks
<jack.hawks@neg.pge.com>, Tomasz Lange <tomasz.lange@southernenergy.com>,
Frank Basham <fbasham@talisman-energy.com>, peter milne
<pjmilne@telusplanet.net>, Jim Bartlett <jim_bartlett@transcanada.com>, Wendy
Hanrahan <wendy_hanrahan@transcanada.com>
Subject: S&P Statement of Principles

Enclosed for your review is a Statement of Principles regarding TransCanada's
Service and Pricing
Settlement for 2001 and 2002, resulting from discussions that took place in
Toronto on February 15 and
16.  We request that Parties indicate by end of business on Tuesday, February
20 whether they:

    1)  Will be a Party to this Settlement;  or

    2)  Will not be a Party to this Settlement but will either support or not
oppose the terms of the
Settlement when submitted to the National Energy Board for approval;  or

    3)  Will oppose the Settlement and will litigate the terms of the
Settlement when filed for
approval with the National Energy Board.

On Wednesday, February 21 we will provide you with the details of the level
of support and will
indicate to you whether TransCanada is prepared to process this Settlement
[i.e. detailed MOU and NEB
Application] on the basis of the support received.

If TransCanada determines that it will process the Settlement, TransCanada
will wish to issue a press
release (indicating that a Settlement with a number of Parties has been
reached) because a Settlement
of this nature may be "material" to TransCanada shareholders.

We thank all Stakeholders for their valuable input into the development of
this Settlement.

 - Statement of Principles_ML5 .doc


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 08/04/00 11:49 AM -----

	Carol St Clair
	07/10/00 07:00 PM

		 To: Luke.Mickum@EngageEnergy.com@ENRON
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Amendments to ISDA Master Enron/Engage Energy US, L.P.

Luke:
I will take a look at this either tonite or in the morning.  Since the UEI
Holdings Guaranty which we reference in paragraph 9 of the Amendment covered
both US and Canada transactions, I don't think that we can say that it has
been terminated until we sign up the Engage Canada deal.  Can you add
language to the Coastal Guaranty that takes care of this instead.  I would
prefer to say in paragraph 9 of the Engage US amendment that "The Guaranty of
Party B dated as of May 19, 1997, heretofore delivered by UEI Holdings Inc.,
formerly known as Union Energy Inc. in favor of Party A as beneficiary, is
hereby replaced by an executed Guaranty from Coastal Corporation, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit B but only with respect to the
obligations of party B under the Master Agreement that are guaranteed
thereunder."  Let me know what you think.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Luke.Mickum@EngageEnergy.com
	07/10/2000 10:47 AM

		 To: carol.st.clair@enron.com
		 cc: Michael.Hugetz@EngageEnergy.Com, Jeff.Buzonas@EngageEnergy.com
		 Subject: Amendments to ISDA Master Enron/Engage Energy US, L.P.

Attached is the standard Coastal guaranty form we use for ISDAs.? I
understand this ISDA is just for these financial instruments and not for the
physical side of the business.? Please give me your comments, if any.

We will split the guaranty with a Coastal guaranty for Engage US and
Westcoast for Engage Canada.?? Since the new threshold is $10 million, the
Coastal guaranty cap is $10 million.?

??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Regards,

??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Luke
<<Guaranty form ISDA-Engage.doc>>

 - Guaranty form ISDA-Engage.doc


Mark,

There has never been a time in our Group before where any member of our Group
was cut off from mass distributions that were sent to all of our client base
and member of the Group but me.  If the intent is to cut me off and make me
feel isolated from the Group and my friends, clients and customers and
associates it is working!
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/02/99 10:07 AM
---------------------------

Tanya Rohauer
09/02/99 07:18 AM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Work Sheets

Does this mean you come of the list? We kept you on at your request even
though you were not drafting the docs.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT on 09/02/99 07:18
AM ---------------------------

Carol St Clair
09/01/99 06:23 PM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Cini/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Tudon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Credit Work Sheets

Tana Jones will be spending most of her time working on special projects for
our group.  Please direct all credit work sheets to Marie Heard, Susan Flynn
and Susan Bailey.  Thanks.
carol


yep

"Amir Cyrus Ahanchian" <acahanchian@zdnetonebox.com> on 09/26/2000 04:58:12 PM
To: Eric.Bass@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: GAME @ 7:00 on Wed

I'm there man, same place?

--
Amir Cyrus Ahanchian
acahanchian@zdnetonebox.com - email
(512) 682-6996 ext. 1087 - voicemail/fax

---- Eric.Bass@enron.com wrote:
>
> our game is at 7:00 tomorrow - can you make it?
>
>
>
>
> "Amir Cyrus Ahanchian" <acahanchian@zdnetonebox.com> on 09/25/2000
> 07:32:58
> PM
>
> To:   eric.bass@enron.com, oren@eyespace.com, rachelduncan@excite.com,
>       dganc@yahoo.com, jefflerner@aol.com, btmazumdar@zdnetonebox.com,
>       moranito@hotmail.com, nghiatn@hotmail.com, Suresh_vasan@enron.net,
>       jwiseman@newregency.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Fwd: Some Light Reading
>
>
>
>
> --
> Amir Cyrus Ahanchian
> acahanchian@zdnetonebox.com - email
> (512) 682-6996 ext. 1087 - voicemail/fax
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
> all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com
>
> Return-Path: <amie.ahanchian@ey.com>
> Received: from gateway2.ey.com ([199.50.26.3]) by mta07.onebox.com
> (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP          id
> <20000924185227.HMDU289.mta07.onebox.com@gateway2.ey.com>
> for
> <acahanchian@zdnetmail.com>; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 11:52:27 -0700
> Received: by gateway2.ey.com (SMTP Gateway) id OAA00909        for
> acahanchian@zdnetmail.com; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 14:50:59 -0400
> Message-ID: <200009241850.OAA00909@gateway2.ey.com>
> Received: by gateway2.ey.com (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1);
> Sun, 24
> Sep 2000 14:50:59 -0400
> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 13:10:35 -0500
> From: "Amie J. Ahanchian" <amie.ahanchian@ey.com>
> Subject: Some Light Reading
> To: amirco@email.msn.com, acahanchian@zdnetmail.com, bird3397@yahoo.com
> X-Mailer: Worldtalk (NetTalk for Windows NT 4.5-g5)/MIME
>
> Since we all love to read newspapers!
>
>
> > NEWSPAPER READERS:
> >
> > The Wall Street Journal is read by the people who run the country.
> >
> > The New York Times is read by people who think they run the country.
> >
> > The Washington Post is read by people who think they ought to run
> the
> > country.
> >
> > USA Today is read by people who think they ought to run the country
> but
> > don't understand the Washington Post.
> >
> > The Los Angeles Times is read by people who wouldn't mind running
> the
> > country if they could spare the time.
> >
> > The Boston Globe is ready by people whose parents used to run the
> country.
> >
> > The New York Daily News is read by people who aren't too sure who's
> > running the country.
> >
> > The New York Post is read by people who don't care who's running
> the
> > country, as long as they do something scandalous.
> >
> > The San Francisco Chronicle is read by people who aren't sure there
> is a
> > country, or that anyone is running it.
> >
> > The Miami Herald is read by people who are running another country.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
******************************************************************************
*
>
> Note:          The information contained in this message may be privileged
> and confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this
> message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible
> for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to
> the
> message and deleting it from your computer.  Thank you.  Ernst & Young
> LLP
>
******************************************************************************
*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

___________________________________________________________________
To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com


Good morning/Eve,

We had a few cuts with SC to SC trades for 1-19,   A new Hour-ahead template
has been sent.

Idaho - at SP-15  & NP-15 ,  We spoke to Kathy at Idaho and have bought the
power back from Idaho at Expost, the hour-ahead schedule that was cut, sticks.

Avista (ael1) -  SP-15 ,  This schedule was re-submitted as a whole schedule
and our load has been dec'd.

Hours mw

1 .57
2 .57
3 .57
4 .2
5 .6

23 4.2
24  4.17

Thank you.


Our web address is:  http://itcentral.enron.com/Data/Services/Training/
You may want to place a bookmark at this site.

A few hints on usernames & passwords:
Passwords are case sensitive and must be entered exactly as entered when
created.   You can cut and paste your USERID and/or password from the
confirmation email (Welcome) to the authentification dialogbox.

Please save the confirmation email (Welcome).  It gives you the username  and
password you will need to use each time you register online.  Use a password
that is easy for you to remember.

To register for a Technology Training class online, you must first give
yourself a password. Click the "Specify Password" button below and you will
be prompted to enter a password.  Then click the "Tech Train Setup" button
and  you will be set up to login to the Technology Training intranet site.
You will receive an eMail confirmation containing your login name and
confirming your password.

Step 1

Click button to specify a password >>>>

Step 2

Click button to complete Technology Training Online setup >>>

Thanks,
Maggie (for LeRea Pharr)
x3-1816


Anita,

There is a delivery nom of 22 @ the above mentioned meter for 1/99
production.  This is a receipt meter.

Can you please explain the purpose of this delivery nom being @ this receipt
meter?  I also have the same situation @ 98-2662 for 1/99.  Also, this
activity is continuing on into 2/99.

Clem Cernosek expressed that these delivery noms are causing errors on his
end of the spectrum.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 02/04/2000 02:31
PM ---------------------------

Lauri A Allen
02/04/2000 01:13 PM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Meter 9699

Jackie-

I cannot for the life of me remember why this sale deal is in there.  I do
believe it is valid and is a part of the purchase deal with Tesoro.  Jill
Zively was the dealmaker and could probably answer your question as could
George Weissman and Melissa Graves.  You might also check with Anita, the
allocator, to see the support she gets for the allocation.  This may give you
some clue as to what this volume represents.  (Let me know, too, since I hate
forgetting things!!!!)


Attached are the comments in Word format (sent earlier in Word Perfect).

 - Market Monitoring.doc


I guess I don't have strong feelings if a dash is written here or not but I
do care that a troubled situation receive the attention it requires to avoid
getting in deeper. There always seems to be reluctance in UK to have a dash
prepared, Steve always used a huge amount of energy on justifying the task.
We all know that if problem deals are not addressed they always get worse.
Maybe Michael could be led to "suggest" an alternative memo or approach. A
"problem deal" memo. If you all think a dash is the best approach do it and I
don't care if they don't sign it.

Once the website is functional, it will be helpful to have a complete history
of deals and having these kind of memos in dash format will aid this process.

One final thought, Michael is quite supportive of our effort and I think we
should pick battles carefully. Rick


I like your ideas - much better developed than in the draft memo.? I'm free
at 7pm.? My home number is 285-7385.? Just patch me in.

- cv

Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA? 94105

phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: cvavrek@deloitte.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 8:26 AM
To: Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco)
Cc: chin@haas.berkeley.edu; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; Mark Guinney;
sama@haas.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: HD Case: Proposed Plan

Hi folks:

Since we have only one page, the write up for number 4 will have to be very
brief.? Before writing it, though, I wanted to offer a few bullets
regarding what angle we might take, and let folks respond, comment,
counter, etc. before writing it up.? I'll clean and beef up once we've
agreed to the approach we'd like to take to question #4.? Finally, I can
work from my office on this this evening, which means that I can use the
conference call capability of my office phone to patch everyone in if we'd
like to do a conference call. If that's what folks would like to do, I'd
prefer to do the call at around 7 PM.? Just let me know.

Best,
Jeff

The question for #4 is:

Stock price is down 23%, significant debt has already been tapped to
support massive growth and covenants on that debt restrict taking on a lot
more debt.

What should HD do w.r.t. current operations and future growth strategy?
???? In the near term focus less on growth and more on getting margins and
EBIT growth back in line with results from previous years.? (Management's
Letter to Shareholders alludes to this, but it's difficult to determine
whether management is just paying lip service to the need to capitalize on
the growth spurt and grown earnings, or continue on the growth effort.)

???? With respect to funding future (more moderate growth), the company
does have some room to increase long-term debt (e.g., current ratio for
1986 = 2.26).? It seems that HD would get better terms and have increased
flexibility by issuing additional debt rather than relying on lines of
credit.? As such, HD ought to look those sources of funding and fill in any
"funding gaps" with funds from the line of credit.

???? Given the significant drop in stock price, HD is likely better off in
the near term 1) moderating growth, 2) improving performance to generate
cash internally, and 3) using long-term debt issuance to provide the funds
needed.? Once performance and stock price improves, then HD should consider
a stock issuance.

How can company improve operating performance?
?? Reduce selling, store operating expenses and pre-opening expenses
?? Improve receivables turnover
?? Improve inventory turnover
?? Improve per store/sales
?? Consider closing poor-performing stores
?? All of which will improve margins

Should company change its strategy?? If so how?
?? Shift from meteoric growth to moderate, targeted growth, and focus on
?? generating positive cash flow from operations
?? Focus on improving performance at existing stores; specifically focus on
?? controlling costs and asset turnover and productivity
?? Consider another debt issuance rather than rely extensively on credit
?? line in order to decrease cost of funds and increase flexibility

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.? If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


Zimin,

Can you interview this guy? Maybe Tanya, a math Ph.D. can help as well.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
08:07 AM ---------------------------
From: Darren Delage@ENRON on 01/11/2001 09:47 AM ZE9
To: Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Interview Candidate

Zimin,
Happy new year!
The financial trading group is looking at a potential candidate for a general
financial trading position in Japan and was wondering if someone from your
area wouldn't mind testing this candidates mathematical skills. She has a
Masters in Stochastic Mathematics  and both a math/liberal arts undergrad. I
feel it is important to test her grasp of the subjects she would have studied
and know that someone from your area would be best suited in providing some
feedback on this.
The candidate's name is Yumi Imokawa. If you don't mind, could I please
schedule a telephone interview for 20 minutes or so? The ideal time is Tokyo
mornings (so for example, at 5:00 in the evening Houston time any day that
you are available..I will just have the candidate call your point person
directly.

Sincerely,
Darren


Susie Lewis in Exxon-Mobil's Public Affairs Department called me today
for an update on The Center's capital campaign.

Terry Koonce has just passed on to her The Center's funds solicitation
packet for consideration and Susie wanted to know how corporations,
other than Enron, are responding to The Center's request.

I indicated to her that the follow-up calling was just beginning and
that as soon as I could give her an update, I would.  I tried to get
information from her regarding Exxon-Mobil's take on the request.  She
hesitated a bit.  I said that the request was for an effort of the
business community that was unprecedented in the history of Houston.
She agreed and said that Exxon-Mobil has two guiding factors in funding
any effort:  1) the potential for impact on E-M business 2) the
philanthropic value.  She went on to indicate that attracting workforce
to the Houston region was a key necessity of E-M.  She also agreed that
unless this region had a plan, it would be left behind.  She was upbeat,
asked intelligent questions and appeared genuinely interested in and
enthusiastic about The Center's efforts.  She has asked that I call her
back next week.

In addition, Dennis Winkler, Manager, Community Relations - Houston for
Shell (and Partnership liaison for Steve Miller) approached me at the
Partnership's board meeting on Tuesday to chat about The Center.  He
mentioned the fact that Steve Miller had asked him to go to Shell's
Foundation and put Center for Houston's Future in line to receive
funding.  Note:  Dennis did this prior to our solicitation packet being
mailed.

I asked Dennis if Steve had received The Center's solicitation packet
and if so, had Dennis heard any comment.  He said that he didn't know,
but asked for a copy of the packet.  This was sent to him.  I am setting
up a lunch with Dennis next week at his request to talk about The
Center.

Please let me know how to proceed. At this point, I have not received
the final list of your calling preferences.  If I can fill-in or
customize the list for you to facilitate your follow-up telephone
calling effort, please let me know.  I would be more than glad to help.
Thank you for all of your help.

> Marilou A. Schopper
> Senior Vice President
> Center for Houston's Future
>
> Address:  1200 Smith, Suite 700, Houston, TX 77002-4400
> Phone: 713-844-3614
Cellular:  713-857-3506
> Fax: 713-844-0214
> E-mail: mschopper@houston.org
>
> Please learn more about us on the World Wide Web at:  www.houston.org
>
>


Peter, I think there was 1 option left out, which is:

Unwind the PML transaction and assume that  you can do what was proposed in
#1 and continue to buy options each year to cover any incremental earnings
you get from the PML/ECC naked hedge.  This would in effect allow you to
assume the full tax shield value of the unwind in earnings this year as there
would never be a tax liability in future years from the potential hedge
income.....This 1)allows ECC to mix it up a little in terms of what we are
doing to mitigate taxes and 2)lets you capture the value of the unwind now
when it is available.  We may not own this asset next year, so the value of
this opportunity would go away....

Cheers, Paul D


You're guess is as good as mine.  Jeff?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dernehl, Ginger
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:43 AM
To:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: California Republican Party

Who is the chairman?  Maybe I can find the number on their internet site.

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:20 AM
To:	Dernehl, Ginger
Subject:	California Republican Party

Rick asked me to send him the phone number for the Chairman of the California Republican Party.  I don't have his phone number, but I do have the number of Tiffany A. Gharagozlou (Deputy Finance Director).  Her number is 818.841.5210.


John:

I got the e-mail last night with the tabs for the breakdown of the current 184 for Operations, inclusive of Power and Gas Logistics.  (The tabs total 184 with one Associate noted on a separate line in Power Logistics, and 183 without that Associate, so I don't know whether you are using 183 or 184 currently for the Operations total.) Taking this number to 100 in total is obviously a big change - 45.6% reduction.  At this moment, I don't know how feasible that is.  But I will work with Jeff, Stacey and Leslie to find out.

We  need some questions answered first to go through this:

1)  Who is coordinating the look at headcount reductions for Gas and Power Logistics?  Together, those groups represent 25% of the 184 headcount.  Going in, I would asssume that they would take their proportionate share of reductions - should be 21 reductions.  We need to know who we should work with to coordinate this.  Need names and weekend contact numbers.

2)  What will the overall headcount be for Netco?  What we need to know is how many gas and power traders there will be and whether or not their anticipated business scope changes.  If commercial numbers don't change and the business scope doesn't change, a 45.6% reduction is probably out of the question.

3)  Is the 100 number for Operations only a start-up number?  Could we anticipate adding staff as business ramps up, approval is obtained for physical gas business, etc.?  Or is the 100 number intended to be the total headcount for all of 2002?

4)  What are UBS' expectations for mid and back office?  What are the views from Legal and UBS on creating confirmations for EOL transactions?  There were some discussions with Leslie Reeves about not confirming certain types of transactions.  One firm, and I don't remember whether it was UBS or not, mentioned that we might not be the confirming agent on transactions, and that instead we would review third party paper prepared for confirmations.  That is a completely different activity than we normally engage in, and would make a difference in staffing - perhaps requiring more people!   We need to know those things from UBS to take a real stab at a revised number.  Should we just pool our knowledge from various discussions that have been had with UBS, or is there someone with UBS that we should be talking with this weekend to get there view of what is required?

5)  Does the internal RAC group go forward under a headcount reduction - i.e. will we be coordinating and providing information to them, or will UBS assume some of their functions?  This may impact our staffing needs.  What about consolidated risk reporting - will Stacey and Jeff simply transmit data to UBS, or Netco have to provide some consolidated risk reporting before sending info to UBS?

We may have more questions, but these are key now to get at a feasible number.

--Sally


I didn't think you were being difficult.

"Wilson Montjoy" <wmontjoy@brunini.com> on 06/06/2001 09:09:45 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: Clarksdale

I'm not trying to be difficult, just didn't understand. I'll call you between
10 and 12:30 to give you an update and verify that I'm proceeding on the
right track.

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 06/06/01 08:24AM >>>

Yes,which is what prompted my email this am. I'm looking for a way to
simplify the process since closing is less than a week away.

I'm in 825-925; 1000-1230 today.

Kay

"Wilson Montjoy" <wmontjoy@brunini.com> on 06/06/2001 08:15:08 AM

To:   <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Re: Clarksdale

Did you get my email yesterday asking for a time to have a call with Rod
and me?

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 06/06/01 08:09AM >>>

Wilson,

We are running short on time.  We are planning to sign on  Tuesday, and I
hesitate to put a new document in front of them at this late date. Would it
be easier to work with reps/warranties?

I definitely need an answer from your firm confirming (1) enforceability
(2) obligation of the Cities to financially support agreement.

Also, could you provide me with the Mississippi law defn of consequential
damages and a couple of examples where Enron could be responsible for same
under this agreement?  Also, can MDEA and the Cities be liableto Enron for
consequentials (absent a waiver)?

Your comments to the previously forwarded draft would be greatly
appreciated.

Kay

"Wilson Montjoy" <wmontjoy@brunini.com> on 06/05/2001 10:33:14 AM

To:   <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Re: Clarksdale

I had spoken to Rod Clement, one of our opinions guys, about having a call
with you, but we hadn't gotten around to scheduling it. What is your
availability this afternoon? Both Rod and I are available.

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 06/05/01 06:25AM >>>
Wilson,

We are trying to finalize this transaction by next Tuesday, and I could
really use your help.  I believe you owe me a draft of an opinion letter?
Also, do you have any comments to the draft agreement I sent out last week?

I also need an opinion that the language in the agreement re the Cities
obligation to financially support MDEA is sufficient.

Thank you,

Kay


On LFT (limited firm) capacity, a specific "path" is required.  The nominations are from a receipt to a delivery.  I have spoken with our Contracts group and have recommended revised documentations.  They are aware that the receipt point, the company entity, and the type of service needs to be corrected.

I understand your nomination is fixed for the first.  Because of a 4:00 meeting, let's talk in the morning.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tate, Paul [mailto:Paul.Tate@Cinergy.COM]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:54 PM
To: Lokay, Michelle
Subject:

Michelle,

I left the info on your voice mail, but wanted to follow up with this.
We can use POI# 3868 (NGPL) as our primary receipt point if the central
pool is not usable.  I would like to talk to you and/or TK more about
it.  Please call as soon as you get a chance.

Paul Tate
713-393-6985


HA
---------------------- Forwarded by Tobin Carlson/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2000 08:38
AM ---------------------------

Cdaidtg275@aol.com on 01/22/2000 08:56:40 PM
To: afoster@jeffco.k12.co.us
cc: pangallos@nidlink.com, Atebb@aol.com, Lunarlois@aol.com,
bnorland@webcombo.net, patch@qnet.com, charfoss@dmi.net, Cfthomas2@cs.com,
dinabarb@gateway.net, wnspirit@presys.com, dporey@juno.com, nomiss@home.com,
captgayel@msn.com, Morpars@aol.com, GERRYDOLL@aol.com,
priceg@dugway-emh3.army.mil, Woodntee@aol.com, JBrown2695@aol.com,
COJHYDE@ihc.com, Janarie76@aol.com, Jeanchey@aol.com, jwlee@televar.com,
JimmyRalph@aol.com, mcroamer@konnections.com, SilhavyJR@aol.com,
YardsaleQ@aol.com, KConnTEX@aol.com, WOODCATS@aol.com, Odessey624@aol.com,
mfoss@dmi.net, mcmom7@juno.com, WRick8908@aol.com, mickypat@gateway.net,
pidrak@centuryinter.net, luvbend@bendcable.com, santee@cityisp.net,
Sanzo2@aol.com, Latrucking@aol.com, terrell@micron.net, Tobin
Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: A Depends Moment

Occasionally, airline attendants make an effort to make the "in flight
safety lecture" and their other announcements a bit more entertaining.
Here are some real examples that have been heard or reported:

1. From a Southwest Airlines employee: "There may be 50 ways to
leave your lover, but there are only four ways out of this
plane........"

2. Pilot: "Folks, we have reached our cruising altitude now, so
I am going to switch the seat belt sign off. Feel free to move about as
you wish, but please stay inside the plane till we land....it's a bit
cold outside, and if you walk on the wings it affects the flight
pattern."

3. After landing: "Thank you for flying Delta Business Express. We hope
you enjoyed giving us the business as much as we enjoyed taking you for
a ride."

4. Upon landing and in the process of coming to a stop at Washington
National, a lone voice comes over the loudspeaker: "Whoa, big fella.
WHOA!"

5. After a particularly rough landing with thunderstorms in Memphis, a
flight attendant on a Northwest flight announced: "Please take care
when opening the overhead compartments. After a landing like that, sure
as hell everything has shifted."

6. From a Southwest Airlines employee: "Welcome aboard Southwest Flight
XXX to YYY. To operate your seatbelt, insert the metal tab into the
buckle, and pull tight. It works just like every other seatbelt and if
you don't know how to operate one, you probably shouldn't be out in
public unsupervised. In the event of a sudden loss of cabin pressure,
oxygen masks will descend from the ceiling. Stop screaming, grab the
mask and pull it over your face. If you have a small child traveling
with you, secure your mask before assisting with theirs. If you are
traveling with two small children, decide now which one you love more."

7. "Weather at our destination is 50 degrees with some broken clouds,
but they'll try to have them fixed before we arrive. Thank you, and
remember, nobody loves you or your money more than Southwest Airlines."

8. "Your seat cushions can be used for flotation in the event of an
emergency water landing. Please take them with our compliments."

9. "As you exit the plane, please make sure to gather all of your
belongings. Anything left behind will be distributed evenly among
the flight attendants. Please do not leave children or spouses."

10. "Last one off the plane must clean it."

11. From the pilot during his welcome message: "We are pleased to have
some of the finest attendants in the industry. Unfortunately, none of
them are on this flight......!"

12. Overheard on an American Airlines flight into Amarillo, Texas, on a
particularly windy and bumpy day: During the final approach, the captain

was really having to fight it after an extremely hard landing. The
flight attendant came on the PA and announced, "Ladies and gentlemen,
welcome to Amarillo. Please remain in your seats with your seatbelts
fastened while the captain taxis what's left of our airplane to the
gate!"

13. A flight attendant's comment on a less than perfect landing: "We ask

you to please remain seated as Captain Kangaroo bounces us to the
terminal."

14. An airline pilot wrote that on this particular flight he hammered
his ship into the runway really hard. The airline had a policy which
required the first officer to stand at the door while the passengers
exited, smile, and give them a "Thanks for flying XZY airline." He said
that in light of his bad landing, he had a hard time looking the
passengers in the eye, thinking that someone would have a smart comment.

Finally, everyone had gotten off except for a little old lady walking
with a cane.
She said, "Sonny, mind if I ask you a question?" "Why no, Ma'am," said
the pilot, "What is it?" The little old lady said, "Did we land or were
we shot down?"

15. After a real crusher of a landing in Phoenix, the flight attendant
came on with, "Ladies and gentlemen, please remain in your seat until
Captain Crash and the Crew have brought the aircraft to a screeching
halt up against the gate. And, once the tire smoke has cleared and the
warning bells are silenced, we'll open the door and you can pick your
way through the wreckage to the terminal."

16. Part of a flight attendant's arrival announcement: "We'd like to
thank you folks for flying with us today. And the next time you get the
urge to go blasting through the skies in a pressurized metal tube, we
hope you'll think of us here at US Airways."


Eddie Daniels, Senior Counsel, joined EWS Legal Department on December 7.
Eddie will report to Lance Schuler and will be located in EB3837A.  Please
stop by and welcome Eddie to the department.

Janette Elbertson
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com


Daren,

 I am sorry I completely forgot to provide you with the meters, there should
be a total of eight.  Please let me know when you have it set up.  Thanks

Thu


<<X16197.DOC>>

Here are the siting amendments. Mike

 - X16197.DOC


(See attached file: special_focusecb.pdf)

      Carr Futures
      150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
      Chicago, IL 60606  USA
      Tel:  312-368-6149
      Fax:  312-368-2281
      soblander@carrfut.com
      http://www.carrfut.com
 - special_focusecb.pdf


[IMAGE]
GLOBECERT
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

				[IMAGE]			[IMAGE]		[IMAGE]
				[IMAGE]					[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]								[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]		[IMAGE]					ANDY, if your issuing certificate number matches the certificate number below, you are entitled to receive $20,000 of Guaranteed Life Insurance for $1.00.  	[IMAGE]
								Wait for the certificate numbers to appear below.	[IMAGE]
				[IMAGE]			  [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
				[IMAGE]			[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]					If your numbers match click here now! 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
									[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]			January , 2002	[IMAGE]		alewis@ect.enron.com	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]			[IMAGE]			[IMAGE]		[IMAGE]

 Globe Life And Accident Insurance Company Policy Forms as applicable by state or GMPRTO term life in Oregon (FL only, Ray Bryant Resident Florida Agent) This policy has some exclusions available to New York residents from First United American Life Insurance Company.


gate code #1455


> -----
>
>
>
>  <<Doc5.doc>>
>
> Sarah,
>
> Attached is the revised confidentiality paragraph. Please review and
> advise at your earliest convenience.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gary Rosenblum
> 212 449-6309
> Vice President and Senior Counsel

 - Doc5.doc


Those are east trades and you probably don't have access to them.  I just
bundled west and east so you can ignore them.

   Kate Symes                01/30/2001 04:23 PM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Incorrect Counterparties

No, that's fine. But because of the new global standards, we're required to
produce and report all corrections made on west power deals each day. So I
was looking into these deals to get trader names, terms, etc., but 3 of them
wouldn't pull up. 507901, 506767, and 507900 don't seem to be in the system.
Are these the correct deal numbers? Let me know when you get a chance.

Thanks,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
01/30/2001 11:56 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Incorrect Counterparties

Thank you.  I think if I send these emails, they eventually pick the correct
CP.  I hope you don't mind that I changed the deals myself.

   Kate Symes                01/30/2001 11:22 AM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Incorrect Counterparties

Thank you for the reminder, Rhonda. I'm going to send out another
announcement this afternoon to all our traders along with the daily
correction log. Hopefully this will incite everyone to pay more attention to
the counterparty names they choose.

Thanks again,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
01/30/2001 09:14 AM
To: Joe Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Geir Solberg/PDX/ECT@ECT, Juan
Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Leaf Harasin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ryan
Slinger/PDX/ECT@ECT, David V Porter/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Incorrect Counterparties

I have changed the following deals b/c the selected CPs are incorrect.  Also,
please remember not to pick CPs in brackets as they are inactive.  Thank you
for your help.

507901 should be Allegheny Power, Transmission Business Unit
507842 should be Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.
506767 should be NRG Power Marketing, Inc.
507900 should be PJM Interconnection LLC
506618 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.
506727 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.
506747 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.


FYI, just verified with Melissa that Reliant received $2,049,602.20 for the items listed below.

Thanks Melissa.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:04 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; 'Jim Taylor (E-mail)'; 'mgarner@reliant.com'; 'sdeleon@reliant.com'
Cc:	'Pete Torres (E-mail)'; 'Shawn Kirkpatrick (E-mail)'; Hamic, Priscilla; Dhont, Margaret; Polsky, Phil; 'anny.page@reliant.com'; 'Tiffanie Wheeler (E-mail)'; Brady, Kevin; Kelly, Katherine L.; Greif, Donna; Barbe, Robin
Subject:	Gas flow and prepayment schedule through 5/1/02

Melissa verified receipt of our $45,000.00 wire yesterday.  Thanks Melissa.

You should receive the following wires today.
$683,835.20 for baseload gas on Trunkline (6,800 dth x 31 days x $3.244)
$1,365,767.00 for baseload gas on Florida (13,000 dth x 31 days x $3.389)

Our current swing gas cash balance is $81,700.00 so we may not send another wire until next week.

Also, Robin Barbe will be my backup when I'm out.  Her number is 713-853-7177.

Thanks

 << File: ENA-Reliant Prepay.xls >>


Congrats!  Things seem to be building rapidly now on the Continent.  Mark


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Mid-Year 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s)
that have been identified for you.  Your feedback plays an important role in
the performance management process, and your participation is very critical
to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

Please provide feedback on the employee(s) listed below by accessing the
Performance Management System (PEP) and completing an online feedback form as
described in the "Performance Management Quick Reference Guide".  You may
begin your feedback input immediately.  Please have all feedback forms
completed by the date noted below.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please call the PEP Help Desk at the following numbers:

In the U.S.:  1-713-853-4777, Option 4
In Europe:  44-207-783-4040, Option 4
In Canada:  1-403-974-6724 (Canada employees only)

Or e-mail your questions to:  perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following list of employees is a CUMULATIVE list of all feedback
requests, by operating company, that have an "OPEN" feedback status.  An
employee's name will no longer appear once you have completed the feedback
form and select the "SUBMIT" button in PEP.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Jun 16, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
AHMAD, ANJAM                    DALE SURBEY                     May 22, 2000
CARSON, MARGARET M              JAMES D STEFFES                 May 26, 2000
GHOSH, SOMA                     TIMOTHY DAVIES                  May 31, 2000
VERNON, CLAYTON J               VASANT SHANBHOGUE               May 26, 2000
YUAN, DING                      RICHARD L CARSON                Jun 02, 2000
ZIPTER, RUDI C                  THEODORE R MURPHY               May 25, 2000


EMAZING Home[IMAGE]Edit Your ProfilePrivacy

		Advice and Living - Brain Candy - Business and Money - Comics - Daybreakers -
Entertainment
		Espaol - Games - Good Thoughts - Grapevine - Greetings - Health - Hobbies -
Horoscopes
		Household Hints- Kitchen - Music - Sports - Style - Technology - Travel -
Wireless

		[IMAGE]

		== One click feeds one person ==
		Please join Emazing in helping feed thousands of people who would otherwise
go hungry this holiday season.  When you click on www.givingpool.org today,
Zthing.com will donate $1.12 to provide a meal for one person - just for
visiting the site! Click  here for more details.

		Bible Verse of the Day
		Wednesday December 6, 2000

		1 Thessalonians 3.12

		The Access Bible, NRSV, New Testament, Page 313

		"And may the Lord make you increase and abound in love for one another and
for all . . . ."

		Visit The Access Bible from Oxford University Press Online!

		Email  this tip to a friend - Browse  the Archives

		[IMAGE]

		The holidays are here!
		So get your warm wishes and season's greetings out to all with EMAZING's
eGreetings! They're fun, FREE, and cover all those merry, bright, and
seasonal occasions.

		 Holiday gift shopping made easy...
		It's Flooz!  The online gift currency you send by email!

		   12 Days of Christmas Sweepstakes - Brought to you by adiamondisforever.com
		Enter our sweepstakes for a chance to win 12 fabulous gifts, Including a
Diamond Solitaire Necklace.

		   Don't spend Christmas without the Grinch...
		Save up to 40% at Amazon's Dr. Seuss Shop!

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		Tip Gift
		SPIRITUAL BOOK OF THE DAY
		Iyanla Vanzant: In the Meantime

		Tip Gift
		MOVIE OF THE DAY
		Left Behind

		Book
		BOOK  OF THE DAY
		Olaf Olafsson: The Journey Home

		CD
		CD  OF THE DAY
		Enya: A Day Without Rain

		Gift
		 GIFT  OF THE DAY
		Nintendo: Hey You, Pikachu!

		DVD
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (DVD)
		George Clooney: The Perfect Storm

		VHS
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (VHS)
		Fantasia 2000

		Quote
		QUOTE  OF THE DAY
		Regret is an appalling waste of energy; you can't build on it; it's only good
for wallowing in.
		- Katherine Mansfield

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		  The holidays are here!
		So get your warm wishes and season's greetings out to all with EMAZING's
eGreetings! They're fun, FREE, and cover all those merry, bright, and
seasonal occasions. Click  here for more details.

		[IMAGE]
		?
		Advertise - Company Info - Feedback - Help - Jobs - Privacy Policy - Terms &
Conditions
		Archives - Edit Your Profile -?Unsubscribe

		EMAZING.com is a service of EMAZING, INC. Copyright 2000. All Rights Reserved.
		EMAZING.com - Whatever you're into, we email it to you. FREE!
[IMAGE]


I don't see an issue with this.  I've cc'd Jeff Dasovich and Sue Mara to check in with them (while I can see California's pulse on the monitor, they actually have their hand on California's throat)!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shields, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:44 PM
To:	Kaufman, Paul
Cc:	Calger, Christopher F.
Subject:	FW: Notional NP15 5-year Price

Mike & Paul,

I have been asked by a consultant to the San Francisco Local Agency Formation Commission to provide a notional number for a 400 MW power supply at NP-15 starting 01-01-02 for 5 years. I had Jeffrey Oh price this but I do not want to send a term sheet until I am sure your OK with this. The situation is that LAFCO has initiated a "30,000 ft. level feasibility study of a measure that is on the ballot to form a new muni in San Francisco and Brisbane.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Oh, Jeffrey
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:29 PM
To:	Shields, Jeff
Subject:	Notional NP15 5-year Price

The price for 7x24 power for NP15 for Jan-02 through Dec-06, 400 MW, is $35.85.

Jeffrey Oh
Enron North America		503.464.7789
121 SW Salmon Street		503.708.1760 (cell)
3WTC 0306			503.464.3740 (fax)
Portland, OR 97204			Jeffrey.Oh@Enron.com


I have purchased from Duke   100 mw's at $51  for flow into Entergy (see
deal#591863) .       Duke is  transmitting this power through their capacity
through SOCO.     In the event of TLR's,   we have the option of cutting this
supply,   without booking out (deal was negotiated with Amar).
If this happens,  of course  you need to fill the demand side and cut the
purchase from Duke in enpower - see deal no. above.   The purchases  go in
the ST SPP book.

Once again,  If RT has to intervene,  please make sure that Enpower is
balanced with respect to ST SPP.     Also,   let me know immediately if there
are problems with this or any other schedule that I have.

You guys are doing a good job.

JMF


Welcome to eMail News Delivery, a service from Business Wire.
Here is your Industrial Information Resources Inc. news release.
If you have received this in error please send a message to:
eMailDelivery@businesswire.com
with the following command in the body of the message:
 unsubscribe TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES
If you have questions about this service, please contact your
Business Wire Account Executive or service@businesswire.com

BW2004  JAN 23,2002       2:01 PACIFIC      05:01 EASTERN

( BW)(TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES) Sempra Energy Constructs 1,250MW
Mesquite Power Plant in Arizona, in an Advisory by Industrialinfo.com

    Business/Energy Editors

	   HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 23, 2002--The following is an
advisory by Industrialinfo.com (Industrial Information Resources Inc;
Houston). Sempra Energy Resources, a unit of Sempra Energy (NYSE:SRE)
(San Diego), will soon complete the underground piping and foundation
for a 1,250MW power plant near Arlington, Ariz. Located on a 400-acre
site, the Mesquite generating station is being built to serve the
southwest power market, including utilities and other whole energy
purchasers.
	   At an estimated $690 million project cost, the 1,250MW plant is
the second largest merchant power plant under construction in the
state, second only to the 2,300MW Gila River project. The plant will
have a natural gas fired combined-cycle configuration consisting of
two 625MW power blocks, each having two GE model PG7241FA combustion
turbine generators and a single GE steam turbine generator. The first
block will come online mid year 2003, with the second block scheduled
to come online in the beginning of 2004.
	   BVZ Power Partners, a combination of Black & Veatch, Overland
Contracting, and Zachry Construction Corporation, is providing
engineering and construction services for the project.
	   Industrialinfo.com provides daily news related to the industrial
market place including industry alerts and databases for the energy
and industrial markets. For more information on trends and upcoming
construction activities for the Energy and Power markets as well as
other industrial sectors send inquiries to
powergroup@industrialinfo.com or visit us at www.industrialinfo.com or
www.iirenergy.com.

    --30--EB/ho*

    CONTACT: Industrialinfo.com, Houston
             Randy Godet, 713/783-5147

    KEYWORD: TEXAS CALIFORNIA ARIZONA
    INDUSTRY KEYWORD: BUILDING/CONSTRUCTION ENERGY OIL/GAS UTILITIES
    SOURCE: Industrialinfo.com

For the best viewing of the news releases please
 use the following email settings:  Courier 10 point.
 -Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer-
 (c) 2000 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
 are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
 conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
 Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
 accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
 individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
 permission.

- Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer --
(c) 1999 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
permission.


Forget the ONE or more contract questions.  I see we expect to have separate
contracts for each project.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           09/20/2000 06:27 PM

To: Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie
Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: CRRA LOI

I have a couple of questions so I can wrap up the LOI:

We refer to licensed Fuel Cell Energy equipment.  Do we intend to reference a
particular manufacturer, or should this be more generic?

Do we want to attach a draft of the Development Agreement, and condition the
final deal on agreeing to terms substantially the same as what's in the
draft?  I have a concern that the Enron optionality bug could bite us on the
backside with that one.

Do we expect to have ONE EPC contract, or several?

I'm looking for the confidentiality agreement, which may be in Bart's files
(haven't checked closely yet).  If anyone has it handy, it could speed things
up for me.

Thanks,

Kay


We have received the following executed EEI agreements:

Sempra  Energy Trading Corp. - 11/15/2000
Dayton Power and Light Company - 12/5/2000

Copies will be distributed to Legal and Credit.


Here is the Dow Jones article...

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Thode/Corp/Enron on 11/21/2000 02:54
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ann M Schmidt                           11/21/2000 02:35 PM

To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith
Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth
Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Schwartz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeannie Mandelker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Damon Harvey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Keith Miceli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Iona Maclean/LON/ECT@ECT, Katy Lomax/LON/ECT@ECT,
Vance Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: DJ Enron, Powerex Investigated For Alberta Price Fixing

=DJ Enron, Powerex Investigated For Alberta Price Fixing
11/21/0 15:31 (New York)

      By Cheryl Devoe Kim
      Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

  TORONTO (Dow Jones)--Canada's Competition Bureau raided the offices of Enron
Canada Corp. in Calgary and Powerex Corp. in Vancouver earlier this year as
part of an investigation into suspected electricity price fixing by the two
companies, according to documents obtained by Dow Jones Newswires.
  Bureau investigator David Bloom alleges in an application for a warrant he
used to gain access to the offices that in the summer of 1999, Powerex and
Enron were coordinating bid restatements and inflating the price each received
for electricity as they traded on the Power Pool of Alberta.
  The investigation hasn't yet produced any charges against either of the
companies, according to Enron. The Competition Bureau declined to comment on
the status of the case.
  Both Enron Corp. (ENE), which owns Enron Canada, and Powerex, a unit of
provincially owned British Columbia Hydro & Power Authority (X.BCH), deny
breaking any rules or laws.
  From Powerex's point of view, Albertans are looking for someone to blame for
high power prices, which have become a political issue in the province.
  "They just find it easy to blame us for what are pretty fundamental market
design flaws," Powerex president and chief executive Ken Peterson told Dow
Jones Newswires in an interview.
   Deregulation Spurs Search For Someone To Blame
  The search for someone to blame has repeated itself across every
deregulating
market Enron has participated in, Enron Corp. spokesman Mark Palmer said.
  "Almost every time that either power markets or natural gas markets or even
oil markets or gasoline markets have experienced any kind of price volatility,
there have been investigations done," Palmer said.
  Enron has been scrutinized before as part of wider energy markets
investigations, he said, but never found to be breaking the rules. This is the
first such investigation into Powerex's actions, Peterson said.
  The Competition Bureau, based in Ottawa, won't say whether the investigaion
is ongoing, citing disclosure rules under the Competition Act.
  The companies themselves said they're not sure of the investigation's
status.
Their seized files were returned several months ago, but Powerex hasn't heard
from the Bureau since then. Enron did receive a call from the Bureau last week
with a question, according to Enron Corp. spokesman Eric Thode.
  The investigation began when the Power Pool of Alberta's system controllers
noticed the clearing price for a megawatt of electricity was topping C$100
with
unusual frequency.
  The Pool's price is set by participants submitting bids to buy or sell power
for the following day. Until Oct. 19, 1999, a bidder could restate the amount
of power in a bid or offer an unlimited number of times, until 20 minutes
before the hour of transmission. The price paid for every megawatt of power
needed by the Pool in a given hour is set by the most expensive unit needed to
meet demand.
   Alleged Bid Rigging Methods Detailed
  According to the Competition Bureau search warrant application, Powerex and
Enron were rigging their bids in the following manner:
  Powerex would lower the volume of an existing offer. As little as two
minutes
later, Enron would increase its offer for the same period by the same volume,
but at a "significantly higher price," according to the warrant application.
Sometimes, Enron would increase its offer even before Powerex had dropped its
offer.
  Power Pool market analyst Owen Craig, who once worked in Enron Canada's gas
trading group, found that "as a result of restatements, involving mostly
Powerex and Enron," the Pool price was raised once to C$200/MWh, four times to
between C$354.29 and C$499.93, three times to between C$500 and C$541.63, and
10 times to between C$801.02 and C$998.
  Based on the restatement patterns, Craig, and then the Bureau's Bloom,
concluded that no new energy was being offered to the Pool. They believed the
power was just being transferred from Powerex to Enron and then offered at the
higher price, according to the warrant application. By cutting the volume
offered by Powerex, the more expensive power offered by Enron would likely be
needed, and every participant would get the higher price.
  Powerex's Peterson doesn't take issue with the trade history as detailed by
the Bureau, but denies that the company's traders were doing anything wrong or
that the two companies had some sort of arrangement.
  "And we're adamant about that," Peterson said. "There was no deal with
Enron.
There was no expectation about what their behavior would lead to in terms of a
change in prices or anything like that."
  Powerex traders were merely locking in their price, cutting the company's
risk, which Enron agreed to take on by buying the power at a fixed price,
Peterson said.
  "Whenever Enron's offer of high-priced energy was declined, within moments
of
Enron being advised by the Pool that their energy would not be required,
Powerex would restate an identical volume of energy back into its lower priced
unit," according to the warrant application.
  Peterson's response: "We're operating in a very tight market there and we
felt an obligation to make sure the power got delivered into Alberta."
  Enron also denies it broke any Power Pool rules or Canadian laws.
  "It boils down to we were offered power at a price lower than we thought we
could sell it at," Enron's Thode said. "And that's what Enron and every other
company does that's in the business of trading."
  The May 25 search warrant covers the companies' actions between June 1,
1999,
and Oct. 19, 1999. On Oct. 20, 1999, the Pool changed its restatement rules,
essentially closing the loophole, though it did so without ever making public
its investigation into Powerex and Enron.
  Power Pool spokesman Wayne St. Amour declined to discuss details of the
investigation.
  "Market surveillance is in place to, among other things, protect the
interests and activities of market participants," he said.
  Those convicted under Canadian law for bid-rigging can be fined an amount at
the court's discretion and/or jailed up to five years. A conviction wouldn't
likely affect Powerex's ability to trade in the U.S., Peterson said. In Canada
"there would have to have some follow-on action by the Alberta parties to
inhibit that. And so far, they still like to get our power."
  Companies Concerned About Reputations
  The bigger problem, Peterson said, is what the case will do to the Powerex
reputation.
  "Essentially both companies are concerned about it because we have a lot at
stake from a reputational point of view," Peterson said. "Both companies, I
believe, conduct themselves in the highest possible standard. But these are
difficult times in the business with prices going crazy in Alberta and
California and people looking for somebody to blame. There's always a
possibility of collateral damage when politics gets involved."
  Powerex parent company BC Hydro is also suspected by the Power Pool of
Alberta of unfairly providing access to transmission through British Columbia,
linking Washington with Alberta, as detailed in an Oct. 13 Power Pool market
surveillance report. Again, no charges have been laid.

  Company Web sites: http://www.powerex.com, http://www.enron.com

  -By Cheryl Kim, Dow Jones Newswires; 416-306-2017; cheryl.kim@dowjon


In cleaning up e:mails, I can across this one from Sheila.  Is this one of
the corrections that was made to the June information?  Any update on July?
Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000 05:07 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Glover                           08/09/2000 02:46 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: June Operating Report

Sally,
Equity Trading, Agri Trading is missing from Gross Revenues piechart.
Sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 02:40
AM ---------------------------

Brian Heinrich
08/08/2000 02:41 PM
To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: June Operating Report

Sheila / Scott,
James asked me to forward you both copies of the June Operating Report, as
well as the list of data included in the report with the person responsible
for providing the information, which Sally discussed in her staff meeting
today.   If you have any questions, please let me know.
Thanks,
Brian


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 09/13/2000 11:05
AM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 09/13/2000 06:00:59 AM
To: chris.booth@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Shipping dates for optional equipment on Change order

Chris,

Below, is the confirmed shipment dates for the change order equipment that
you currently have on order with us.

A couple of these (modular control room, 50 ft and retrofit to add Power
System Stabilizer to generator) need new line items in Exhibit N-2 when
writing up the change order.

Thanks,

Lee
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 2:24 PM
> To: Storm, Michael E (PS, SSEP)
> Cc: Martin, David C (PS, SSEP)
> Subject: Shipping dates for optional equipment on Change order
>
>
> Mike/David,
>
> Here's the run down on Ready to Ship (RTS) dates for the change order
> equipment that I show for Enron:
>
> 1. Exhaust stack, 45 ft standard; quantity 4; RTS 10/30/00  (Enron ordered
> via memo to David Davis on March 6, 2000)
> 2.a. Exhaust stack, 45 ft heavy; quantity 4; RTS 10/30/00  (Enron ordered
> via memo to David Davis on March 6, 2000)
>    b. Exhaust stack, 45 ft heavy; quantity 4; RTS 2/28/01
>    c. Extensions to 90 ft. for 8 heavy wall stacks; quantity 8; RTS
> 2/28/01, (price $ 89,000 each extension)
> 3.Modular control building, 50'; quantity 4; 2xRTS 2/28/01 & 2xRTS 3/30/01
> 4. Unit Motor control Centers; quantity 8; 4xRTS 2/28/01 & 4xRTS 3/30/01
> 5. Chiller modules, quantity 8; 2xRTS 10/30/00 (Enron ordered via memo to
> David Davis 3/6/00)
> 3xRTS 2/28/01 & 3xRTS 3/30/01
> 6. Cooling towers, quantity 8; 4 x RTS 2/28/01, 4 x RTS 3/30/01
> 7. Power system stabilizers, ($ 31,875 per unit), 4xRTS 2/28/01, 4xRTS
> 3/30/01
>
> I need you to confirm by Monday AM, so I can forward on dates to Chris
> Booth to finish the Change Order.
>
> Lee
>