Dear E-Savers Subscriber,

US Airways is pleased to announce a special Cozumel E-Savers offer.

You may depart on Sundays, between February 3 and February 24, 2002.  Return travel is Sundays, between February 10 and March 3, 2002.  Saturday night stay is required.  Tickets must be purchased by January 31, 2002.

PURCHASE E-SAVERS ONLINE AT http://www.usairways.com/esavers/offer_czm.htm AND RECEIVE A $10 DISCOUNT OFF OF THE FARES LISTED BELOW.  THE $10 DISCOUNT DOES NOT APPLY WHEN BOOKING BY TELEPHONE THROUGH US AIRWAYS' RESERVATIONS DEPARTMENT.

Tickets must be purchased at the time of reservation.  For more information on Cozumel, please visit http://www.usairways.com/travelguide/caribbean/czm.htm

********************************************************************
                           Europe on Sale

US Airways invites you to experience Europe with new low fares for travel between the U.S. and the exciting destinations of: London, Manchester, Frankfurt, Madrid and Paris.  For full details, and to take advantage of this offer, book online at http://www.usairways.com/promotions/specials/eur_valentine_sale.htm by Friday, February 8, 2002.  Travel must be completed by March 7, 2002.
********************************************************************

FROM:                     TO:                       ROUNDTRIP FARE:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Baltimore, MD             Cozumel, Mexico           $315

Philadelphia, PA          Cozumel, Mexico           $315

Fares shown are based on roundtrip Coach travel on US Airways/US Airways Express, during the period specified above. Depending upon your travel needs, alternative routings may be available at the same fares, with part of the service on regional aircraft operated by US Airways Express carriers Allegheny, Air Midwest, CCAIR, Chautauqua, Colgan, Mesa, Piedmont, PSA, Shuttle America or Trans States.

For travel, call 1-888-FLY-E-SAVERS and request one of the E-Savers listed above. Or, to make your reservations online and save $10, please visit us at http://www.usairways.com/esavers/offer_czm.htm

********************************************************************

Earn 2,500 Miles to the Caribbean

Enroll in the US Airways Dividend Miles program and fly your first flight on US Airways/US Airways Express to the Caribbean, and earn 2,500 bonus miles. Offer valid through May 31, 2002. The enrollment bonus cannot be applied retroactively and is not valid for current Dividend Miles members. Offer valid for U.S. and Canadian residents only. Visit http://www.usairways.com/dividendmiles/offers/usairways.htm for complete details.

Reminder: Make sure your Dividend Miles account number is in your E-Savers reservation, so you can earn miles for worldwide award travel on US Airways and our partners. To enroll in Dividend Miles, go to http://www.usairways.com/dividendmiles/index.htm
To earn even more miles, book E-Savers using your US Airways Dividend Miles Visa card. To apply for the Dividend Miles Visa card issued by Bank of America, please visit us at http://www.usairways.com/dmcreditcards

Please note:  Online booking mileage bonus does not apply to E-Savers.

********************************************************************

                        US AIRWAYS VACATIONS

US Airways Vacations is pleased to offer Cozumel, Mexico land packages to provide a complete vacation experience.  Vacations include hotel accommodations for up to 21 nights; roundtrip airport/hotel transfers; hotel taxes and service charges.  A variety of optional features including attraction admissions and sightseeing tours are available.

EXPERIENCE COZUMEL, MEXICO!!!
-----------------------------
Seven nights hotel from:
Casa Del Mar - The Divers Inn             $300
Fiesta Americana Cozumel Dive Resort      $614
Iberostar Cozumel - All Inclusive         $702
Presidente Inter-Continental Cozumel      $963

Purchase these land packages online at http://www.usairwaysvacations.com/pricing_res.htm  Simply enter your origin and destination cities, departure date, number of adults, children's ages and click "Search For Vacation."  Choose "Hotel and Car Vacations for 1-59 nights," confirm your departure date and indicate the number of nights for your vacation. Click "Check Availability" and continue with your choices for hotels and options as the system presents them until you reach the final price. You may then purchase your vacation with a secure credit card transaction. If you prefer to speak with a reservations agent, call 1-800-352-8747.

Rates shown are per person based on double occupancy for Sunday departures 2/3/02 through 3/3/02. Hotel space is limited and may not be available at all hotels on all days.  Additional travel dates, hotels and rates are available.  Prices are subject to change with or without notice and do not include miscellaneous hotel charges typically paid by the customer directly to the hotel.  Substantial restrictions apply for refunds.  Other conditions may apply.
US Airways' online booking discount is not available on vacation packages.

********************************************************************

E-SAVERS FARE REQUIREMENTS: Roundtrip purchase required.  One-way travel, stopovers, wait-listing, standbys are not permitted.  Travel must begin and end in the same city.  Tickets become nonrefundable 24 hours after making an initial reservation, however, changes may be made for a minimum $100 fee, provided changes are within the allowable days of travel and seats are available.  Tickets must be purchased at the time of reservation and made in advance of travel.  Saturday night stay required.  Fares do not include up to $18 airport passenger facility charges, where applicable.
Fares are valid to Cozumel 2/3-2/24/02, on Sundays, and from Cozumel 2/10-3/3/02, on Sundays.  All travel must be completed by 3/3/02.  Tickets must be purchased by 1/31/02.  Seats are limited and are not available on all flights/days.  Fares cannot be combined with other fares, discounts, promotions or coupons.  Fares will not be honored retroactively or in conjunction with the exchange of any partially used ticket.  Lower fares may be available in these markets.  Other restrictions may apply.  Fares shown do not include total government-imposed taxes/fees/surcharges of up to $85.

This is a post-only mailing sent to scorman@ENRON.COM.  Please do not respond to this message. To change preferences or un-subscribe from this list, please visit the E-Savers page at:

http://www.usairways.com/esavers/enroll.htm

Copyright US Airways 1996-2002.  All rights reserved.


Alex worked with Jitendra on VAR review in the past.  He did not strike me as
a dynamic person.  I cannot use him for my group, and I am lukewarm about
getting him for Research Group.  If Bryan wants to hire him directly for his
KMV experience, then we can work with him.

Vasant

Vince J Kaminski
04/14/2000 03:55 PM
To: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enroncredit.com

Vasant, Tanya

Any interest?

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/14/2000
03:56 PM ---------------------------

Melanie Doyle
03/10/2000 04:33 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brad McSherry/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enroncredit.com

Hi

This guy  has applied to Credit.com in Houston, I spoke to him yesterday and
then passed my comments to Bryan Seyfried.  Bryan suggested he may be of
interest to you.  I let this this guy know that he would hear from us either
way and if we want to pursue the application we would invite him for
interviews in Houston.

Please give me a call if you need more information.

Melanie
00 44 171 783 7740.

---------------------- Forwarded by Melanie Doyle/LON/ECT on 10/03/2000 10:26
---------------------------

Bryan Seyfried
08/03/2000 07:51
To: Brad McSherry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melanie Doyle/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Enroncredit.com

Let's start getting these guys in to interview.  Melanie can do initial
telephone interviews and then coordinate with Brad to ensure we are seeing
the best people.  I would like to move as quickly as practical.

bs

From: Brad McSherry on 07/03/2000 13:17 CST
To: Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Enroncredit.com

---------------------- Forwarded by Brad McSherry/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2000 01:17
PM ---------------------------

alexander.c.davidson@us.arthurandersen.com on 03/03/2000 01:55:23 PM
To: brad.mcsherry@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Enroncredit.com

Dear Mr. McSherry:

I   am   responding  to  your  search  for  credit  risk  professionals  on
the
enroncredit.com   website.   After  working  for  seven  years  on  credit
risk
management  in  a  research and consulting capacity, I would like to transfer
my
experience  in  assessing  credit  risk  modeling,  information  technology
and
methodology  in  complex  top-tier  institutions  to  an  active  credit
trading
managerial   environment.   I  am  excited  about  being  involved  in
trading,
origination, risk management and R&D of credit derivatives.

I  have  seven years of experience in credit risk measurement and
management.  I
have  helped  design,  test  and implement credit value-at-risk systems with
KMV
Corp  and  with  a  major  Japanese  bank.   I was a major contributor at KMV
in
designing the Expected Default Frequency model and I am thoroughly familiar
with
its  assumptions,  strengths,  weaknesses and applications.  I did the
empirical
research  that  lies  behind the KMV default correlation model, the private
firm
EDF  model  and  I interfaced with J.P. Morgan (now R.M.G.) personnel during
the
creation of the CreditMetrics documentation.

I  have  excellent analytical, quantitative, statistical and programming
skills.
I studied finance extensively when I was a graduate student and I studied
credit
risk theory while I worked with KMV and Arthur Andersen.  I am eager to join
the
credit derivative team at Enroncredit.com where I am certain that my
combination
of   quantitative   research  skills,  credit  risk  consulting  experience
and
technology   expertise   make  me  uniquely  qualified  to  support  the
credit
derivatives trading and risk management function.

I  have  included  my  resume  with this e-mail.  Please e-mail me or call me
at
201-420-0191  (home)  and  212-708-4027  (work)  so  that  we  can  discuss
this
opportunity further.

(See attached file: Alex.doc)

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent
to
Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

 - Alex.doc


Looks fine to me.

	Suryan Wirya Simunovic
	07/28/2000 06:32 AM

		 To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Sea Freight Launch Flyer

As per previous e-mail, International Sea Freight wants to launch 2 new
products on August 1st.  Would appreciate your approval / recommended changes
of the attached flyer.

Thank You

Suryan
---------------------- Forwarded by Suryan Wirya Simunovic/LON/ECT on
28/07/2000 12:33 ---------------------------

	From:  Helena Jarabakova                           28/07/2000 12:09

To: Suryan Wirya Simunovic/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:

latest:

i'll be down in a sec


Revised to show "same day" purchase of 20,000 MMBtu at Oasis Sealy for gas day
of 2/20/01.

(See attached file: HPLN0221.xls)

 - HPLN0221.xls


Effective today, please send future correspondence to me at :
staceykn@yahoo.com.  Thanks.


Emergency funds needed: https://secure.apk.net/gb/contribute.html

On Election Night, George W. Bush won the most votes in Florida.
Not surprisingly, Al Gore's campaign did not like the result.  They
immediately dispatched lawyers to Florida and had a Washington
lobbyist raise $3 million in one day to fund Gore's Florida operation.

Unfortunately, the Gore camp refuses to accept the Election Night
count or the 2nd computer count or even, in some instances, a 3rd
computer count.  Now they want a hand count, even though computer
counts are more precise and objective.  On top of that, they have only
asked for hand counts in counties that are overwhelmingly Democratic.

We have the high ground.  We're poised to win.  But we need your help
to defend the integrity of the Florida election.

CLICK BELOW TO MAKE A SECURE ONLINE CONTRIBUTION TO THE BUSH CHENEY
RECOUNT FUND NOW:

https://secure.apk.net/gb/contribute.html

PLEASE SEND THIS TO AS MANY CONCERNED AMERICANS AS YOU KNOW.

Unlike the Gore Campaign, which is accepting donations from
contributors whose name and contributions they are refusing to
disclose, the Bush Cheney Recount Fund will limit contributions to
$5,000 and disclose its donors on our Website.

Thank you for all you've done to help elect Governor Bush and
Secretary Cheney.  Your continued commitment and generosity during
this important time in the life of our country is greatly appreciated.

https://secure.apk.net/gb/contribute.html

AOL users: Bush Cheney
Recount Fund

_____________________________________________________________

Contributions to Bush Cheney Recount Fund are not tax deductible
for federal income tax purposes.  Corporate and foreign national
contributions are not permitted under federal law.  Only
personal funds are permitted.

Paid for by Bush Cheney Recount Fund
http://www.georgewbush.com

==============================================================================

To unsubscribe, please go here:

http://www.georgewbush.com/unsubscribe.asp?email=EBASS@ENRON.COM

To change
your e-mail address or any other subscription information, please go here:

http://www.georgewbush.com/MyGeorgeW.asp


Ben,

This article was originally written for the International Financial Review
(IFR) for a piece on CSFB as the best bank of the past 25 years.  It has
some good background on the firm.

 <<CSFB 1975-1999.doc>>

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.

 - CSFB 1975-1999.doc


Yes, contracts exist between Enron Power Marketing and other Enron companies, i.e., Enron Wind Development, Enron North America, Enron Canada Corp., Enron Energy Services

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Luong, Sheri
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:00 PM
To:	Jones, Tana; Denton, Rhonda L.; Fitzgerald, Genia; Korkmas, Deb; Perlingiere, Debra
Cc:	Stewart, Meredith
Subject:	Counterparties

All,

We are currently working on the data model for the Trading Agreements System and have a question pertaining to internal/external counterparties.  Are all agreements between an internal company(counterparty) and an external company(counterparty)?  I spoke with Meredith Stewart (the data architect for this project) and she found an agreement between 2 internal counterparties, e.g. Enron Louisiana and ECT.

Please let me know ASAP.

Thanks,

Sheri Luong
Corporate Systems Development
Enron Net Works
ECN1831C
(713) 345-3553


To Members of the RTO West Stage 2 Provisions and Requirements Content
Group Meeting:

Hello!

Just a quick reminder that the next meeting of the Provisions and
Requirements Content Group Meeting is Wednesday, March 21st, from 10:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the Portland Airport Hilton Garden Inn.

Attached is an updated version of Gerry Garnett's interconnection
diagram.  Our thanks to Gerry for this material!

Cheers, Kristi

 - GenConConf2.doc


The language looks fine to me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Balfour-Flanagan, Cyndie
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:43 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald; Wallumrod, Ellen
Cc:	Richardson, Stacey
Subject:	Special Language for ENA Upstream GTCs: Pymt Due Date = 25th
Importance:	High

Gerald/Ellen

Please review & edit as necessary. If possible, once "buffed to a shine", I'd like to be able to insert this language into the GTC Confirm template above Notice information. This particular scenario is for Unimark LLC (deal #1146397).

Language Take 1:

Payment Terms:  As hereto agreed, payment by Buyer to Seller for gas received by Buyer during the preceding calendar month shall be made payable by wire transfer on the 25th Day of the Month following delivery. If the due date for any payment to be made under this Agreement is not a Business Day, the due date for such payment shall be the following Business Day.

Please let me know as soon as possible as this is a Nov Production deal that has not yet been confirm & also due to the prior conversations Settlements, Judy, Lisa & Contracts has had with the CP.

Thank you!!!
Cyndie


I am concerned about the status of the Power and Gas GTCs.

I am pushing the marketing group to sign up customers in advance of launch
but we still have not finalized an agreement. This is of the utmost
importance otherwise turning EOL on will be like listening to yourself
talk.

Please advise of the status of these documents and when I can review them.

MFG


Ken,

Attached is the agenda for Enron's upcoming Management Conference.  I've
received valuable input from numerous members of Enron's management team and
this is the result.  While it is quite a departure from the traditional
conference agenda, I think it will prove to be engaging and
thought-provoking.  I'll look forward to your input.

If you are comfortable with the agenda, I'd like to send a copy of it to the
Executive Committee accompanied by a memo from the Office of the Chairman
explaining the goals and objectives for the conference.  It is important that
senior management understand the change in format and their role, if any, on
the agenda.  (I recognize that some executives look forward to presenting at
this conference and their absence from the agenda may be an issue for them.)

I am working with some talented people to create a slide template for all
presenters.  We're also asking that all presenters use PowerPoint.  A
standardized template and format will ensure that all the presentations, even
those from external presenters, have a similar look and feel.   I'll run that
template by you as soon as it is finalized.

Please let me know if you have any questions, comments or concerns.


These are the last brown bags for the year so be sure to take advantage.  If
you have suggestions for future speakers I would like to hear from you as
well as any other comments you may have.

Jen Fraser, Director of Origination in EGM - December 5 from 12 to 1 in 30C1
Berney Aucoin, Director of Commodity Structuring - December 12 from 12 to 1
in 30C1

Call or email Stacey Dempsey.


Attached is the summary of ENA's take obligations under all the purchase
agreements to date in the Powder River Basin.  Please call to discuss.  Sorry
for the delay.


Hey Dan, Gary,

Gary entered into this transation to sell this counterparty 1,000 mmbtu/d at
an Index related price with a Put option of $3.50 and a premium of 0.095.  As
I understand it, Gary will never be buying gas from his counterparty and this
is the only transaction he plans on doing with the counterparty.  If this is
the case, I would think only a Master Sales agreement would be needed instead
of a Master Purchase Sale Agreement and thus a Credit Worksheet is not
needed. Please let me know if this is not the case.

Thanks
Russell

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary W Lamphier                           01/09/2001 01:51 PM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: JER/BRE Austin Tech

Russell,
Please let Dan know you have approved this deal.

Dan J Hyvl
01/09/2001 11:37 AM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: JER/BRE Austin Tech

Gary,
 Credit has a hold on this deal.  As you are aware, we need a credit
worksheet before we can generate the proposed contract.  If you can get
Russell Diamond to issue a credit worksheet to me, I will be glad to start
work on the request.

	Gary W Lamphier
	01/09/2001 11:13 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: JER/BRE Austin Tech

Dan,
Did we ever send a contract out ot these guys?  I know we discussed it but I
bet I never requested a contract.  Let me know.


As you might be aware,  Susan Scott (the book admin for the pipe option book)
was forced by system problems to stay all night Wednesday night and until 200
am Friday  in order to calc my book.  While she is scheduled to rotate to the
West desk soon,  I think we need to discuss putting two persons on my book in
order to bring the work load to a sustainable level.  I'd like to meet at
2:30 pm on Monday to discuss this issue.  Please let me know if this time
fits in your schedules.

Thanks,

Larry


We are already receiving several inquiries regarding the upcoming
Presidential Inauguration.  Enclosed is information pertaining to everything
from hotel accommodations and travel to the Texas State Society Black Tie
and Boots Inaugural Ball, which is the official Presidential Inaugural Ball
for the State of Texas.

Furthermore, I would like you to notice that several of the hotels in
Washington, DC are not taking reservations until November 8, 2000.  In order
to reserve a room for the Inauguration, you might want to begin calling
hotels at the open of business on that day.  You will find a compiled list
of many hotels on pages four through six in the attached information.
Please make a note that most hotels require a minimum length of stay of four
nights.  You will want to plan accordingly.

In addition, I do not recommend that you rent a vehicle during your stay.
Due to the large number of people in Washington at this time, driving will
be next to impossible.  It is in your best interest to utilize the Metro
system or to take a cab.

I hope you find the enclosed to be useful.  Please feel free to call my
office at 202.225.2231 or email Jenny Sheffield at
jenny.sheffield@mail.house.gov if there is anything else that I can do to be
of assistance.  I look forward to seeing you in January!

Sincerely,
Pete Sessions
Member of Congress

 <<Presidential Inauguration Schedul1.doc>>

 - Presidential Inauguration Schedul1.doc


Have you had a chance to look into this yet?

Thanks,
Diane

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:44 AM
To:	Roberts, Mike A.
Cc:	Fellers, Diane R.
Subject:	FW: EGM Charges for Avistar

Mike,

Does it sound right?

Vince
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fellers, Diane R.
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:31 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Cc:	Crenshaw, Shirley
Subject:	EGM Charges for Avistar

Vince,

I have gotten notice from EGM that they want to charge your cost center for the use of a weather research system named Avistar that someone is your group is using.  The plan is to allocate part of the depreciation of the asset to your cost center.  The total cost will be $10,583 over a 3-year period so the cost will not be significant, but I wanted to be sure you were aware of and approved of this charge.  Please let me know.

Thanks,
Diane
X5-7996


Sure:

I am already taking care of that.

Thanks.
Paulo Issler

Vince J Kaminski
11/15/2000 09:59 AM
To: Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: REQUEST for historical curve information

Paulo,

Can you please, help him with this?

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000
10:06 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mike Barry @ ENRON                           11/15/2000 07:55 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: REQUEST for historical curve information

Vince,

Per our conversation this morning, I would appreciate the following
historical curve information as soon as possible:

1.  On February 17,2000, what was the summer '00 strip for Vent to ML 7,
Demarc to ML 7, and Vent to Chicago

2.  On July 27, 2000, what was the August '00 strip for Vent to Chicago

3.  On May 9, 2000, what was the May '00 strip for Vent to Chicago

4.  On May 30, 2000, what was the June strip for Vent to Chicago

5.  On June 29, 2000, what was July Strip for Vent to Chicago

6.  On Sep. 29, 2000, what was the October strip for Vent to ML 7

Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.  Please call
me if you have any questions.  Thanks again!

Mike Barry
402/ 398 - 7105


Christina,

This is just a reminder that I will be out of the office on Monday.  If they need me to answer any questions here are the phone numbers:
281-894-0468 (home)
281-382-5215 (cell)

Stacey


These are not spot deals.  PanEnergy did not receive gas on the exchange.
However, they did deliver gas to us at Cotton Valley.  According to the
contract, when volumes are overdelivered, HPL buys the gas at GD-.10.  So, in
order to correctly estimate our economics, I changed the price on the
delivery to reflect how the deal will settle.  This occurred in August and
September.  Any spot deals will be on seperate tickets.

Days 5 & 6, as well as 9-31 should be settled as if the exchange was in
place.  (PanEnergy overdelivered about 7,800 per day, which we buy at Gas
Daily -.10)

D

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           10/03/2000 02:29 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Duke Energy Field Deal 157288 8/00

Daren:
I am taking over the Duke account from Katherine and am having trouble with
8/00 production.  It looks like we have some spot deals included in the
exchange deal 157288.  I think days 9 - 31, which are priced at GD - 0.10,
need to be moved to a new ticket if they are spot.   Let me know if you
agree.  Also, can you confirm for me that days 8/5 and 8/6 are suppose to be
exchange?  The sale volume for those two days was zero, so there was no
exchange.  We have not received any statements from Duke yet, so there is
nothing to verify our volumes.

You may also want to look at Sept. 2000 for deal 157288.  It looks like spot
deals are being included in the exchange deal.  Those will need to be moved
to a new ticket if they are spot.

Thanks,
Megan


If you have missed any of the Newsletters on IS Barriers in Div 2, Zener
Barriers, Ground Monitoring Systems, Surge Protection, Process I/O,
Rotational Speed Application, or Intrinsically Safe Pneumatic Valves, please
click your reply button and note same.

Is Grounding a Substitute for Surge Suppression Protection?

One of the most common questions regarding Surge Suppression is whether it
is necessary when a grounding system exists. Proper grounding is necessary
for the Instrumentation and Automation systems in use today, but is no
substitute for Surge Suppression equipment in preventing electrical system
damage. Grounding should only be part of the strategy in preventing
equipment damage from electrical surges.

An electrical surge is a burst of voltage that lasts only a matter of
microseconds but which generates very large amounts of current, and this
current must be diverted away from the electrical equipment to be protected.
Some people hold the opinion that if a grounding system is installed, the
electrical system voltage will rise together and lower together and that no
damage to the equipment will occur. While this could be true in theory, the
reality is that very few installations are isolated from other voltages. For
example, the addition of computers with modems or network cards introduces
another ground into the system.

If the two buildings are separated electrically, then the possibility of
damage is minimized, but it is more likely that modems or data lines
interconnect the buildings. A typical scenario might be:

 A lightning strike in the vicinity of one building increases the
 ground potential to 200KV.

 The resistance of the ground decreases this voltage to 15KV
 by the time it gets to the ground circuit of that building.

 As the voltage decreases over the distance to the adjacent
 building, it has lowered to 3KV, with a resulting difference
 of 12KV.

In such a case, the voltage difference between the two buildings generates a
surge current large enough to destroy the communication lines between the
two buildings, and no grounding system can prevent the damage to the
communication ports of the computers. Similarly, any instruments mounted
outdoors can have the same type of voltage difference from the control panel
to which they are connected.

Therefore, while good grounding is essential, it will not neutralize the
potential damage to equipment and processes caused by a surge event.

To discover how you can benefit from an MTL solution in a variety of
applications, visit us at www.mtlnh.com, www.mtl-inst.com, and/or
www.telematic.com. You may call MTL at (800) 835-7075 for the location of
the MTL Representative nearest to you.

To unsubscribe, please use your REPLY button and write "Unsubscribe" in the
subject line.


Kate, same thing on this trade. I think it should be FPL Energy Power
Marketing b/c I received a confirm on it. Secondly on the confirm it states
that hour 0100-0600 is priced at $95.00 and then again at hours 2300-2400.
7-22 is priced at $140. However I do not show in the system 1-6 and 23-24 at
$95. Did he forget to put in the off peak or is FPL incorrect.

Thanks,


Is this a sample of what might be in your limo on the 27th?

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001
10:06 AM ---------------------------

FAP <FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu> on 02/16/2001 08:35:22 AM
To: Clay DeGiacinto <clayton.degiacinto.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>, Deepa Mallik
<mallikd@wharton.upenn.edu>, dennis Feerick
<dennis.feerick.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>, Heather Thorne
<hethorne@wharton.upenn.edu>, Jack Rejtman
<jack.rejtman.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>, Jason Cummins
<Marc.Cummins.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>, Kim Whitsel
<whitselk@wharton.upenn.edu>, Nicholas Levitt
<Nicholas.Levitt.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>, Omar Bassel
<bassalo@wharton.upenn.edu>, Ram Vittal <mvittal@wharton.upenn.edu>, Steve
Lessar <Stephen.Lessar.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>, Thomas
<Thomas@wharton.upenn.edu>, Tulika Bhalla <bhallat@wharton.upenn.edu>,
Vincent Chen <vincent.chen.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>
cc: FAP <FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu>, "'vkamins@enron.com'"
<vkamins@enron.com>, "'patterm@wharton.upenn.edu'"
<patterm@wharton.upenn.edu>
Subject: change-video to teleconferences-Enron

3/1     SHDH 215
3/22   SHDH 215
3/29   SHDH 215

Please note that the remaining videoconferences scheduled with Enron have
been changed to teleconferences due to the difficulties we have experienced.
The host has agreed and we will, therefore, continue with teleconferences in
the same locations/dates as noted above.

Any questions, please contact the FAP office.

Thanks,
Donna


I will need to get feedback from Mark Taylor and then let you know.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT on
08/22/2000 11:01 AM ---------------------------

Eric Gadd
08/22/2000 10:02 AM
To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alfred Pennisi/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA
Subject: Re: MG update

Jeff-

Thanks for the memo.  After meeting with Al Pennisi in NY on Friday and
discussing your memo, I am confident that all the issues you raise can be
addressed so that we can have MG London act as Enron's clearing broker.  I've
asked him to contact you to review in more detail.  Please let me know the
outcome and action plan - - - is it feasible to complete this week?

	From:  Jefferson D Sorenson                           17/08/2000 19:08

To: Eric Gadd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: MG update

Please find attached an action plan to determine the feasibility of MG acting
as a clearing broker on Enron's behalf.
As indicated on my voice message please call me so that we can discuss. (713
853-5294)

Thank you,
Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT on
08/17/2000 01:02 PM ---------------------------

David P Dupre
08/17/2000 12:59 PM
To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: MG update


Please plan to meet at 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday for an informal question/answer session.  The best place to gather is in the rows between Trading and Origination.  Chris Calger will not be in the office on Wednesday, so I will be conducting the session.

At this point I do not have any significant new information about our company status, but I will relay the latest information that I have.  I know there are many rumors swirling around right now.  I will try to answer any questions that people have.  It would be helpful if people would submit questions in advance.  Although this is not a requirement for asking questions, it would be helpful if you would email questions/rumors to Julie Kearney before the meeting.

Please let me or Debra know if you have any questions.


Oliver,

We would like to push up the consolidated DPR delivery time to approximately
1 PM Houston time.  We are contemplating setting an 11:00 am deadline for all
information we receive daily to prepare the DPR.  This would require the
London Summary to be delivered by 5 pm London time.   Please let me know your
thoughts regarding this initiative and if there is anything we can do to help
speed up the whole process.

Thanks,
Mike


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 01/08/2001 03:00 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Miremadi, Ali" <AMiremadi@caiso.com>
12/24/2000 09:19 PM

To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
cc: ISO Client Relations <ISOClientRelations@caiso.com>
Subject: DOE Certification for Monday, December 25

ATTACHED, FOR YOUR INFORMATION ONLY IS THE DOE CERTIFICATION LETTER ISSUED
DECEMBER 24th for OPERATING DAY DECEMBER 25, 2000.

PLEASE NOTE - THE RESOURCE INFORMATION REQUEST, REFERENCED IN THE
CERTIFICATION, WAS DIRECTED ONLY TO SPECIFIC ISO MARKET PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARILY LOCATED NORTH OF THE ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION PATH 15.

UNLESS YOUR REAL-TIME OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT RECEIVED A SPECIFIC E-MAIL AND
FOLLOW-UP TELEPHONE CONFIRMATION, NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED AT THIS
TIME.

THE INTENT OF THIS GENERAL MARKET DISTRIBUTION IS FOR INFORMATION AND NOTICE
ONLY.

PLEASE DIRECT ANY QUESTIONS TO YOUR RESPECTIVE ISO CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE.

 <<001224 Certification Ltr__.doc>>  <<001224 Analysis Load_A.doc>>

Ali Miremadi
(916) 608-7061

 - 001224 Certification Ltr__.doc
 - 001224 Analysis Load_A.doc


Got the list and will begin contacting/meeting with recommended individuals
immediately.

Summary on the Legal opinion is essentially the following:

As long as no public funds are utilized to provide support to the search
committee and/or its efforts, information obtained/compiled by the committee
is not considered public information. However, any documented information
that I or the committee exchange with the City is considered public
information. The City may provide support to the committee only to facilitate
the committee's contact with the persons or groups that will provide input.

City has agreed with recommendation of placement of Advertisement with the
International Association of Fire Chiefs and it is now due to appear in the
Classified section of the next issue (Feb. 1 distribution and web posting) of
International Fire Chiefs' "On Scene" magazine.

City was very pleased with efforts utilized to compile potential candidate
list (City does not have this list but Ted Bland & Exec Recruiters do.) As a
matter of fact, TriData's Fire Chief recommendation was already included on
the list.

Lisa


Today is the final day of the EWS United Way Leadership Giving Campaign and we need your help!

If you have already made your pledge, thank you for your generosity.  If not, we need you to read on.

To date, we have pledges of $327,075, which is over 25% of our total EWS goal of $1,276,000 and over 42% of our EWS Leadership goal of $765,600.  This Leadership goal is 60% of the total EWS goal and we would like to have 100% participation from EWS Leadership.

Here are the pledge totals and participation rates by EWS Business Unit Group:

	Group			Pledge Total		Participation Rate
	EA			$39,275		3.54%
	EGM			$51,740		4.38%
	EIM			$42,515		11.35%
	ENW			$49,444		1.81%
	EEOS			$22,138		12.63%
	EWS HR		$5,460			4.17%
	EWS Business Analysis and Reporting
				$23,794		11.01%
	EWS Legal		$27,380		10.87%
	EWS Treasury		$12,236		42.86%
	EWS Research		$13,000		4.26%
	EWS Business Development
$10,588		37.50%

To meet our EWS Leadership goal, we need all of the EWS leadership to participate.  It only takes a couple of minutes.  Please click on https://hrglobal.enron.com/ and complete your online pledge.  You will need your GIS ID and password.  If you are not sure what your ID and password are, please go to https://ehronline.enron.com, click the "Accept" button, and then click on "Forgot your User ID or Password?"

The company-wide campaign kicks off on Monday and we would like to announce to the EWS organization that the EWS leaders have set the pace for a successful campaign exceeding our goal of $765,600.  Your contribution will help make this happen.

Thank you in advance for your participation.


Thanks for your note and welcome back to Enron.  I am so pleased that you
have returned.  I, too, look forward to working with you.  --Sally

Ryan Seleznov@ENRON
01/26/2001 10:28 AM
Sent by: Ryan Seleznov@ENRON
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Congratulations

Sally, congratulations on your promotion!

I am really looking forward to working with you and your team and have
scheduled some time to visit with you on 2/5.

Ryan


I'm there!

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 09/05/2000 04:35:31 PM
To: "'Baker, Briant'" <briant.baker@bhlp.com>, "'Bowen, Tricia'"
<tbowen@enron.com>, "'Campos, Alma'" <alma.campos@wcom.com>, "'Chastain,
Renee'" <reneechastain@hotmail.com>, "'Chokshi, A'" <ami_chokshi@enron.com>,
"'Collins, Joann'" <joann_collins@enron.com>, "'Cooper, Audrey'"
<a.cooper@levin-kasner.com>, "'Dempsey, Rhonda'" <rdempsey@energyusa.com>,
"'Gallagher, Lisa'" <lgallagher@heritagetexas.com>, "'Germany, Chris'"
<chris.germany@enron.com>, "'Klein, Mary'" <blarnich@aol.com>, "'Kolosseus,
Mike'" <mckolosseus@dow.com>, "'La Madrid, Victor'"
<victor.lamadrid@enron.com>, "'Landry, Chad'" <landryc@ggc.com>, "'Luby,
Patrick'" <jpatrickl@poboxes.com>, "'Luis, Michelle'" <maluis@equiva.com>,
"'Mehra, Ziba'" <zibam@theticketcompany.com>, "'Mitchell, Meredith'"
<mmitche2@enron.com>, "'Olinger, Kim'" <kolinge@enron.com>, "'Preuss, Byron'"
<estate@infohwy.com>, "'Scherwitz, Scot'" <sascherwitz@dow.com>, "'Shelton,
Carolyn'" <carolyn_a_shelton@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sumrow, Chris'"
<Chris_Sumrow@Kindermorgan.com>, "'Sumrow, Molly'" <molly.sumrow@enron.com>,
"'Vachuska, Cindy'" <cindy.vachuska@enron.com>, "'Vigil, Gene'"
<aevigil@dow.com>, "'Wagner, Cassandra'" <cawagner@equiva.com>, "'Wagner,
Ross'" <rwagner@altra.com>, "'Williams, Sean'"
<swilliams01@coral-energy.com>, "'Frnka, Dawn'" <dfrnka@equiva.com>,
"'Bienski, Janet'" <jbienski@velaw.com>
cc:
Subject: BBQ - Joni's Sendoff - Sunday, Sept 10th, 4 pm

   It's a Party and You're Invited

   Occasion:  Farewell Party - Joni Veselack
  Day:  Sunday, September 10
  Time:  4:00 p.m.
  Place:  Woods on Augusta (pool area)

 I'm heading up north and didn't want to leave without having one
last get together around the pool!!! So, I decided to fire up the grill and
bbq.  I will have some snacks along with the bbq, but any side dishes or
desserts will definitely be enjoyed by one and all.

 Please bring your own "Cheer".

 Also, I need a head count for how much bbq to buy. (Get your minds
out of the gutter.) So, please let me know if you're attending.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Don't mean to keep the chain of emails going, but given the cameras and the
grand-standing politicians (who seem to have an abundance of rhetoric and
capacity for scape-goating, and a paucity of constructive solutions or the
will necessary to do what needs to be done), seems worth considering the pros
and cons of throwing anyone in front of any legislative committees.  We may
decide that the pros outweigh the cons and that there's discernable value
having our outside counsel speak to the issues of supply and demand in
California and the West, but seems worth spending 5 or 10 minutes on.

Best,
Jeff

	Paul Kaufman@ECT
	01/11/2001 01:30 AM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Special Oversight Committee

What the heck are you doing awake at 2:00 a.m.

Re:  the hearing.  I'm really not sure that this hearing is worth spending
alot of time worrying about--at least given my understanding of the scope of
this Committee's responsibilities during the special session (i.e, the lack
of responsibilities).   Although, Sandi may know more about the importance of
this hearing based on discussions with the Committee folks, from our
discssions over the past couple of days in Sacto it really seems like the
hearing will be informational in nature.

In any event,  I don't see the downside to having Mike do the testimony.
Mike knows enough to be helpful to the Committee.  He's easy to insert in the
process.   While I have absolutely no problems using Robert Michaels, the
hearing is on Tuesday--less than one week from today--and somebody would have
to vet his testimony and work with him to prepare the document.  If we can
make this work, I'm all for it.  It just seem a lot easier to use Mike.

Re:  why can't we just say no.  From my standpoint there is an upside in
participating--we continue to support Wright.  Wright has become the voice of
reason on energy issues.

Susan J Mara@ENRON
01/10/2001 10:48 PM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Special Oversight Committee

Can't we just say "no"?  I know Rod thinks highly of Mike, but I'm having a
hard time seeing what he can add on the stated topic.  Mike Day is certainly
no expert on supply and demand.  I can understand our reluctance in putting
an Enron person on the stand, so maybe we shouldn't.  Why not pay an
economics consultant, like Robert Michaels to represent us?  He's been in the
media lately and has the right type of expertise.  ALso, he's just joined
TCA, so we could easily use him.

	Paul Kaufman@ECT
	01/10/2001 10:19 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Special Oversight Committee

The invitation is to participate in a meeting before the Utilities and
Commerce Committee of the regular session.  The oversight committee is an
entirely different matter--as of yesterday no schedule for its meetings had
been set (timing may follow the release of the CPUC auditor's report on the
utilities).

As for the invitation to speak, my thought is that we ask Mike Day to speak
on our behalf.  The issue we have been asked to address is, very generally,
supply and demand.    Day has a lot of credibility with Wright and it's
Wright's committee.   Just be sure, this afternoon, Sandi was following up
with the Wright's office to get a better picture on scope of the hearing.
With regard to this subject, I asked Alan Comnes to look through the Mary
Hain presentation to FERC (from last summer) and pull out the slides that
were relatively current (or not too awfully out of date).  From what we have
seen so far, I don't think we need to get to worked up over this particularl
hearing before the regular Utilities committee.  All the action will occur
before the special session committees.

If the need to discuss the hearing continues to be an issue, let's talk
further.   Sandi please follow up with Sue on what we've discovered through
Wright's office re:  the Tuesday hearing.

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT on 01/10/2001 10:18
PM ---------------------------

Susan J Mara@ENRON
01/09/2001 10:50 PM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Special Oversight Committee

We need to discuss our response to this invitation
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 01/09/2001 09:22 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	01/09/2001 03:15 PM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Bruno Gaillard
<bgaillar@ees.enron.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Mona L Petrochko
<Mona_L_Petrochko@enron.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J
Mara <smara@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman <pkaufma@ect.enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Special Oversight Committee

There will be an oversight subcommittee of the new committee formed to
shape energy policy in the Special Session.  In a meeting today,
Assembly Member Darryl Steinberg, who will Chair the subcommittee, told
us he expects to hold two hearings to "track the money" between
utilities, geneators and wholesalers.  He hopes to wait until after the
completion of the PUC audit, unless that audit drags on longer than the
next week or so.  He is planning a "constructive investigation" and
pledges to be fair.  The subcommttee will be staffed by the Speakers
Office of Oversight.

Also, Enron has been invited to testify at an informational hearing of
the Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee on January 16, 2001.  The
general topiic is how supply and demand affect the California market and
what options are available for new or repowered generation in
California.


I would like to terminate my membership to The Bodyshop effective immediately. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Thank you,
Joseph H Parks, Jr
832-851-2821


Drew -- see MK's comments.  I'm trying to come up with some new language to
address her concerns.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           12/22/99 03:24 PM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Transwestern Contract Approval Request

Please give me a sign off if this is OK.  Thanks DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/22/99 03:24
PM ---------------------------

Christine Stokes
12/22/99 08:33 AM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Transwestern Contract Approval Request

TRANSWESTERN CONTRACT APPROVAL REQUEST

Please review the provided non-standard discount letter for Duke Energy
Trading & Marketing.   Duke's 18,000 Dth/d Ignacio to Blanco contract has a
one year term and a seasonal based 1-part rate structure.  Transportation on
an alternate basis is provided for on a south to north flow direction at an
incremental $.01 charge based upon actual utilization of the described path.

Please provide an indication of approval via REPLY WITH HISTORY.  If any
questions arise, please contact me at x35702.


Do we have any resolution on this matter?  Is there anything that I can do to
help?  Please let me know.

Thanks,

Terri
713-853-9899

---------------------- Forwarded by Terri Harlan/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000 03:25
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Terri Harlan                           09/27/2000 01:32 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Assumption and Assignment

I received this letter form Goldman Sachs this morning.  According to them
short positions are the only ones that require this letter.  Can we
use/modify this letter and submit it to Morgan Stanley and Bear stearns, or
do we need to get something from each of them?  Please let me know.

Thanks,

Terri
3-9899

---------------------- Forwarded by Terri Harlan/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000 01:25
PM ---------------------------

"Sibeud, Eugenie B" <eugenie.sibeud@gs.com> on 09/27/2000 12:09:50 PM
To: "'Tharlan@enron.com'" <Tharlan@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Apologies for the delay.  My e-mail went totally dead last night, and has
just now come back.  (Apparently I have sent to many large document files).

Attached is the assignment agreement that we discussed.  Please feel free to
call me if you have any questions.  I can be reached at (212) 902-1930.

Kind regards,

Eugenie Sibeud

 <<Enron Assignment.doc>>

 - Enron Assignment.doc


We do not understand our VAR.  Can you please get us all the detailed reports
and component VAR reports that you can produce?

The sooner the better.

Phillip


Jeff,

I am a YPOer in the Rebel Chapter who was given your name from an IOS source
as someone who could potentially help in this situation. As background, I
sent this IOS request out last week:

Description of Situation
My highway construction company has been negatively impacted by price
volatility in energy prices (fuel, natural gas, and asphalt cement). We
offer long term, fixed price contracts to our clients yet must purchase our
petroleum and energy-related products at spot market prices. Thus we are
exposed to significant price adjustment risks.

Type of Feedback Requested:
Does anyone have experience using commodity contracts as an arbitrage
strategy to offset the risks of potential price volatility in the energy
sector? If so, do you have specific recommendations for how we should
proceed?

Thank you for any information you can offer.

As I have investigated this further, I find no one in this industry (highway
construction) who is purchasing futures to mitigate their energy cost
exposure. I have spoken with folks who are doing this in the building supply
sector with lumber futures.

Do you have any thoughts or suggestions in this matter? Any input would be
greatly appreciated.

Many thanks,

Michael Mangum
Rebel Chapter

President/CEO
The Mangum Group, Inc.
PO Box 31768
Raleigh, NC 27622-1768

919.571.7605 Phone
919.510.6740 Fax
919.868.8179 Mobile
919.845.3497 Home


Yes, this question pertains to generation owned or controlled in California.
Since Enron does not own or control any generation in California this data
request would not apply.

>>> <Mary.Hain@enron.com> 10/06/00 01:32PM >>>

Concerning your Data Request to Generators #2, I believe this question was
sent to us in error.  Enron Power Marketing does not own any generation in
California, so these questions do not apply.  Please let me know if I have
read the question incorrectly.

 (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  "Brian Harrington"
 pic12292.pcx) <brian.harrington@ferc.fed.us>
               10/05/2000 01:27 PM

To:   <Mary.Hain@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Data Request #2 - Nox Credits

Here is the second data request.  Please call me with any questions.

Thanks

(See attached file: Generators#2.wpd)