Columbia Gas sent me the December invoices via federal express.  The cover letter states that Columbia Gas is aware that ENA will not be paying the pre-petition amounts but that they expect full payment for the post-petition amounts.

I'm sending you a copy of the letter.  I assume that we will not be paying any of the invoice.

Any news on the Columbia Gas park & loans?

Thanks
chris


morale, deal flow, how the open plan is working

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:02 PM
To:	Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject:	UK Visit

Mark:

	My next trip to the UK is scheduled for the week of November 5.  Is there anything specific you need me to address?

Thanks,

Jeff


This requires a bit of work , but is along the right lines . Please let me
have any comments . Rick we need to refer to the other areas we talked about
or just state that there will be a later announcement covering those ,
Michael
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael R Brown/LON/ECT on 04/04/2001
14:19 ---------------------------

Beverley Ashcroft
04/04/2001 13:59
To: Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Memo's from Mark Schroeder

Hello,

Here are the documents as requested.

Trusting they are sufficient.

Should you have any queries please come back to me as I will be speaking to
Mark later this afternoon.

Regards,

Beverley

Organisation Announcement Thought Process


By popular vote, we will have a draft instead of an auction and the draft
will take place on 8/20.

Rules to follow.

Eric


Notice No. 01-160
May 15, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX Division Members/Member Firms
All NYMEX Division Clearing Members
All NYMEX Division Floor Traders
All NYMEX Division Operations Managers

FROM:
George Henderson, Vice President

RE:
Options Expiration Operational Procedures for the Trading Floor and Clearing
Members
________________________________________________________________

The expiration date for the June 2001 options contract for Gasoline-Crack
(CGM1) and Heating Oil-Crack (CHM1) is Monday, May 21, 2001.

GENERAL OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

All Clearing Members and Qualified Floor Traders that carried an options
position as of the close of business day prior to the expiration day, or
engaged in trading activity on Expiration Day in the expiring options
contract will be required to have a knowledgeable, duly authorized
representative present at their normal work station promptly at 5:30 p.m.
until released by the Exchange staff as specified below.  All adjustments
and/or corrections, must be accompanied by relevant supporting documentation
prior to being incorporated into expiration processing, in essence making the
expiration processing an extension of the afternoon trade resolution
procedures.  All input to the NYMEX Clearing Department will conclude no
later than 30 minutes after floor representatives are released.

Exchange Clearing (299-2110), Floor Trade Correction (299-2068 and 299-2169)
personnel, as well as a representative of the Floor Committee will be
available to assist with the processing of notices of Exercise and
Abandonment, position transfers, trade corrections and other questions or
problems you may have.

CLEARING DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

The Option Expiration process is a screen based process for which all
information is provided on the screens on C21 terminals. No Option Expiration
Reports will be provided. The following screens will assist you through the
Option Expiration process:

MEMBER TRADE INQUIRY
Contains real-time top day trade information, trade information for the
previous 4 business days and trades adjusted for the previous 4 business days
by adjustment date.

SINGLE POSITION MAINTENANCE
Contains a real-time snapshot for each option series from the start of day
position to the projected end of day position.

REVIEW ACCEPT REJECT TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfers "TO" your firm and the status of
each transfer.

REVIEW SUBMITTED TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfer "FROM" your firm and the status of
each transfer.

EXERCISE NOTICE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the number
of long positions you wish to exercise.

DO NOT EXERCISE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the number
of long positions you wish to abandon.

POSITION CHANGE SUBMISSION
PCS may be submitted either by manual input or by electronic transmission.
Any PCS input on a Clearing 21 terminal will be the input processed by the
system.  This input may be made at any time prior to 6:45 p.m.  Any PCS input
via transmission for that contract series will be disregarded.

ALL POSITIONS ARE DEEMED FINAL
Upon completion of all PCS input, all positions will be deemed final.

EXERCISE/ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION
Will be available to you on the Single Position Maintenance window by
contract series or the Assignment List window which contains all your
Assignments on one window. You will be notified of its availability by C21
E-Mail and by Fast Facts. This should occur within 1 hour of the last PCS
input.

All Clearing Members are required to have an authorized representative(s) at
their C21 workstations in preparation for any communication during the
expiration process.

FAST FACTS
Clearing Members should call the Fast Facts information service 301-4871,
access code 700 for event messages advising Members of the event status.

E-MAIL
Clearing Members should read their C21 E-Mail messages immediately to be
aware of event status.

The standard event Fast Facts and/or E-Mail messages and the sequence in
which they will be announced are:

Standard Event Message: Announce Out-of-the Money Exercise and In-the-Money
Do Not Exercise Submissions
Approximate Time of Message Availability: 5:45 PM
Usual Event Time: 5:45 PM
Announced via Fast Facts

Standard Event Message: Announce Final Input to C21 Cutoff Time
Approximate Time of Message Availability: 6:30 PM
Usual Event Time: 6:45 PM
Announced via e-mail

Standard Event Message: All positions are deemed final
Approximate Time of Message Availability: 7:30 PM
Usual Event Time: 6:45 PM
Announced via Fast Facts

Standard Event Message: Announce Exercise/Assignment Information Available on
the Single Position Maintenance Windows
Approximate Time of Message Availability: 8:25 PM
Usual Event Time: 8:30 PM
Announced via Fast Facts and e-mail

Standard Event Message: All Report Distribution is completed
Approximate Time of Message Availability: 11:00 PM
Usual Event Time: 11:00 PM
Announced via Fast Facts

The times appearing in the Usual Event Time column are based on normal
operational conditions and could vary.

NYMEX EXPIRATION DAY PROCESSING OVERVIEW OF MEMBER REQUIREMENTS

Time: 5:30 PM
Activity: Exercise Notice Submission
Event: Input to C21 Cutoff Time
Reference Number: 1

Time: 5:30 PM
Activity: Do Not Exercise Submission
Event: Input to C21 Cutoff Time
Reference Number: 2

Time: 5:45 PM
Activity: Announce Out-of-the-Money Exercise and In-the-Money Do Not Exercise
Submissions
Event: Fast Facts Notice
Reference Number: 3

Time: 6:30 PM
Activity: Announce Final Input to C21 Cutoff Time
Event: C21 E-mail
Reference Number: 4

Time: 6:45 PM
Activity: Final Input to C21 Cutoff Time
Reference Number: 5

Time: 7:30 PM
Activity: All Positions are Deemed Final
Event: Fast Facts Notice
Reference Number: 6

Time: 8:25 PM
Activity: Announce Exercise/Assignment Information Available on the Single
Position Maintenance Windows
Event: Fast Facts Notice and C21 E-mail
Reference Number: 7

If you have any questions concerning these procedures, please contact Charles
V. Bebel at 299-2130, Angel Rivera at 299-2150 or Anthony Di Benedetto at
299-2152 prior to the expiration date.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-160)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Adjectives suitable for use on corporate email fail me in attempting to
describe this individual, whose animus, in my view clearly is at such a
level that it cannot possibly be disinterested.

   _____

 <http://www.thestreet.com>  <http://www.thestreet.com>
<http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/thestreet.com/markets;abr=!ie;mkts=detox;pti
le=1;sz=468x60;ord=080112?>
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif> 	 <http://www.thestreet.com>
TheStreet.com	  <http://www.realmoney.com> RealMoney.com
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/hedgefund_show/tsc_pp_land.html> Professional
Products	   <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/rmlanding/realmoneysub_full_land.html>
Subscribe Now!	  <http://www.thestreet.com/tilex/pages/specialoffers.html>
Special Offers	  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/help.html> Help!
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>

 Quotes & Search <http://images.thestreet.com/tsc/left_nav/qs_left_nav.gif>

  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>

Quotes

  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>

 Search Site

  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>

<http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/thestreet.com/homepage;hmpge=toolsquotes;sz=
120x33;ord=?>
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
  <http://images.thestreet.com/tsc/left_nav/grey_bot.gif>
 <http://www.thestreet.com/br/> Hot News
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif> 	Market Briefing
<http://www.thestreet.com/br/>
Market
<http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/latestfind/results.html?st=T1001640
&nh=50&sec=Today's+Market+Movers> Movers
Analyst  <http://www.thestreet.com/briefing/iupdown.html?tkr=&Funds=1>
Actions
Latest Wire  <http://tscquote.thestreet.com/AllWireNews.jhtml> Stories
Latest TSC Stories <http://www.thestreet.com/now/>
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
  <http://images.thestreet.com/tsc/left_nav/blue_bot.gif>
 <http://www.thestreet.com/stocks/> News and Analysis
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif> 	Tech Stocks
<http://www.thestreet.com/tech/>
Markets <http://www.thestreet.com/markets/>
Commentary <http://www.thestreet.com/comment/>
Personal  <http://www.thestreet.com/funds/> Finance
Company News <http://www.thestreet.com/stocks/>
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
  <http://images.thestreet.com/tsc/left_nav/blue_bot.gif>
 Calendars <http://images.thestreet.com/tsc/left_nav/cal_left_nav.gif>
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif> 	Earnings
<http://thestreet.ccbn.com/earning.asp?client=thestreet> Reports
Conference  <http://thestreet.ccbn.com/conferencecall.asp?client=thestreet>
Calls
Economic  <http://www.thestreet.com/markets/databank/10002634.html> Calendar
IPO Calendar <http://tscquote.thestreet.com/tsc/ipo/>
Stock  <http://www.thestreet.com/briefing/isplits.html?tkr=&Funds=1> Splits
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
  <http://images.thestreet.com/tsc/left_nav/blue_bot.gif>
 <http://tscquote.thestreet.com/> Tools
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif> 	TSC
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/wireless.html> Wireless
RealTime  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/moneynetland.html> Portfolio Tracker
Risk  <http://www.riskgrades.com/clients/thestreet/index.cgi?NAVTSC>
Analysis Tools
Glossary <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/glossary.html>
TheStreet  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/streetnotes/> Notes
Stock  <http://thestreet.spyonit.com/thestreet/Home> Alerts
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
  <http://images.thestreet.com/tsc/left_nav/blue_bot.gif>
 <http://www.thestreet.com/tilex/pages/specialoffers.html> Featured Offers

  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif> 	RealMoney
<http://offers.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/set.cgi?code=rmft> Free Trial
Era  <http://sub.thestreet.com/c/K/show/HT/XVAL/pf/XVAL1?Distributor=XVAL>
of Value
The  <http://sub.thestreet.com/c/K/show/HT/XGBS/home/XGBS1?Distributor=XGBS>
Chartman's Top Stocks
Action
<http://sub.thestreet.com/c/K/show/HT/XAAP/pf/XAAP1?Distributor=XTSM> Alerts
PLUS
Equity
<http://www.multexinvestor.com/redirect.asp?geid=21145&url=http://thestreet.
multexinvestor.com/search.asp?target=/stocks/analystresearch/home> Research
TSC  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/tsc_confcenter.html> Conferences
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
  <http://images.thestreet.com/tsc/left_nav/blue_bot.gif>
  <http://chart.bigcharts.com/custom/thestreet-com/threequote-djia.gifquote>

<http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/thestreet.com/homepage;hmpge=ticker;sz=88x31
;ord=080112?>

 <http://www.thestreet.com/pf/markets/detox/10002964.html>

 <http://www.thestreet.com/markets/> Markets : Detox
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/common/images/storytitle_line.gif>

  <http://images.thestreet.com/tsc/common/images/icons/1002980.gif>
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif> 	Shell-Shocked Enron Parts With CFO
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
By Peter  <mailto:peavis@thestreet.com> Eavis
Senior Columnist
10/24/2001 06:40 PM EDT

Enron's ( ENE <http://tscquote.thestreet.com/StockQuotes.jhtml?tkr=ENE>
:NYSE - news <http://tscquote.thestreet.com/BBNews.jhtml?tkr=ENE>  -
commentary
<http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cmttkrfind/results.html?tkr=ENE&sit
e=tsc>  - research
<http://thestreet.multexinvestor.com/search.asp?Ticker=ENE>  - analysis)
<http://www.riskgrades.com/clients/thestreet/index.cgi?tickers=ENE>
problems won't go out the door with Andrew Fastow.

The finance chief, who was replaced Wednesday, came under scrutiny as the
executive who orchestrated and profited from a hedging deal that went sour,
saddling Enron with a $1.2 billion charge to equity. As details of this
deal, and  <http://www.thestreet.com/markets/detox/10002702.html> others,
have emerged over the past two weeks, Enron stock has collapsed, falling 54%
in just seven days.

  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
<http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/thestreet.com/markets;abr=!ie;mkts=detox;pti
le=2;sz=336x280;ord=080112?>  border=0 height="280" width="336">
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>

Wednesday, the stock fell a further 17% on enormous volume, signifying that
once-faithful mutual fund holders were bailing. Also Wednesday, a raft of
once-friendly analysts downgraded the stock. Faced with betrayal on that
scale, Enron management at last felt compelled to act; a press release says
Fastow is taking a leave of absence. He's been replaced by Jeffrey McMahon,
formerly CEO of Enron's industrial markets group.

How might the Enron bulls spin this? Likely, they will point to McMahon's
alleged opposition to Fastow's role in the big hedging deal, called LJM2, to
show that the "Fastow era" is over. The Wall Street Journal, citing
anonymous sources, reported Tuesday that as treasurer at Enron McMahon
complained about Fastow's possible conflict of interest. Probably, the fear
was that Fastow couldn't serve Enron and LJM2 equally, especially as he was
allegedly making a lot of money from LJM2.

Clearly, if McMahon turns out to be a new broom, that's a positive for
Enron. An Enron spokeswoman declined to comment on whether The Journal's
account of McMahon's stance on LJM2 was correct.

Plunging
Investors not liking Enron here

  <http://images.thestreet.com/markets/detox/1425.gif>

Not much else is encouraging, however. Fastow's departure shows that it took
massive drops in Enron stock to force senior management into action. On a
difficult  <http://www.thestreet.com/markets/detox/10002864.html> conference
call Tuesday, CEO Ken Lay gave Fastow resounding backing. It took
Wednesday's plunge to get Lay to sign off on a new CFO. In other words, Lay
listens only when the market screams and hollers. How much further does the
stock have to fall to bring further much-needed reforms at the company?

The spokeswoman responds that Lay had discussions with analysts Tuesday and
Wednesday that led him to the conclusion that Fastow's replacement was
necessary to rebuild investor confidence.

Enron culture is thick with financial sorcery. People got upset by one
shadowy deal, but no one knows exactly how the company's core energy trading
business makes money. It's hard to believe the LJM2 deals were done in
isolation and without the knowledge of the board.

In fact, the chatter is that Fastow and Skilling proposed the LJM2
transactions to the board after it was reluctant to enter the broadband
business. The board apparently feared the volatility that might come from
being in broadband, so Fastow allegedly proposed LJM2 as a way to hedge that
volatility away. This meant LJM2 entered agreements that gave it access to
increases in the value of broadband assets but protected Enron from the
downside. Should the whole board be on the hook, too? The spokeswoman
responds that the board would not have entered the LJM2 transaction if it
had not thought it would benefit Enron and its shareholders.

Lay has shown himself to be woefully out of touch with the market's views.
Arguably, that's downright reckless for a trading company that is dependent
on potentially skittish short-term financing. Letting things get this bad
has risked good faith among Enron counterparties and bankers. It shows an
unhealthy reluctance to address key problems until they're unavoidable. The
spokeswoman responds that the company is now working hard to improve
transparency.

Any efforts in that direction will be much appreciated, but is it any wonder
people compare this lot to Long Term Capital Management?

   _____

Know any companies that the market may be misvaluing? Detox would like to
hear about them. Please send all feedback to peavis@thestreet.com
<mailto:peavis@thestreet.com> .

In keeping with TSC's editorial policy, Peter Eavis doesn't own or short
individual stocks. He also doesn't invest in hedge funds or other private
investment partnerships.
   _____

Read our conflicts and  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/disclosure.html>
disclosure policy.
Order reprints <http://www.thestreet.com/about/reprints.html>  of TSC
articles.	 Top
   _____

 <http://finance.yahoo.com> Back to Yahoo

 <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/shopping/online_invest.html>
<http://www.scottrade.com/index.asp?supbid=3663>

<http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;2640182;4639705;i?http://mds.centrport.net/md
sefc?a20250041;MDLJ101C1540P29225B30088S0;B30088;1> Apply now for a
CSFBdirect account
<http://images.thestreet.com/tsc/common/images/marketplacemod/arrow.gif>
ONLINE INVESTING
Get
<http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;2640235;4639705;h?http://mds.centrport.net/md
sefc?a27250041;MDLJ101C1540P29225B31579S0;B31579;1> a FREE Handspring(tm)
Visor(tm) from CSFBdirect.
<http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/thestreet.com/markets_module;sz=1x1;stile=1;or
d=>

<http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;3080541;4639705;g?http://ad.doubleclick.net/c
lk;3076416;6112422;w?http://www.netbank.com/promotion/online.htm>
<http://images.thestreet.com/tsc/common/images/marketplacemod/arrow.gif>
BANKING
Get
<http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;3080541;4639705;g?http://ad.doubleclick.net/c
lk;3076416;6112422;w?http://www.netbank.com/promotion/online.htm> a $50
bonus from NetBank.

   _____

  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>

Home <http://www.thestreet.com/>   |   Top  |   Welcome / TSC Network
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/> Tour  |   Site
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/sitemap.html> Map  |   Who
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/whoswho.html> 's Who  |   Reader
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/2cents.html> Feedback  |   Jobs
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/jobs.html>
  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif>
Terms  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/browser.html> of Use  |   Privacy
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html> Policy  |   Conflicts
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/disclosure.html> Policy  |   Advertise
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/onlinekit/index.html>   |   Investor
<http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/ir/> Relations

  <http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/c.gif> ? 1996-2001 TheStreet.com, Inc. All
rights reserved.

<http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/thestreet.com/contextual_unit;sz=1x1;ord=08011
2?>
<http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/thestreet.com/markets;mkts=detoxpp;sz=1x1;or
d=080112?>
<http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/thestreet.com/contextual_unit;sz=1x1;ord=08011
2?>
<http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/thestreet.com/markets;mkts=detoxpp;sz=1x1;or
d=080112?>

                                         ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Susan, Attached is the supplement to the gas letter which increases the
amount of gas TW delivers to the LLC. Please review and let me know.


Hello Everyone,

	This weekend saw more tough games to pick, both in college and the pros. Among the games missed by many people were, in college games, Michigan/Michigan St.; Stanford/Washington; UCLA/Washington St.; Illinois/Purdue; and Texas A&M/TexasTech.
In the pros, Baltimore/Pittsburgh was not a good game for most people, Seattle/Washington was a bad one and NY/Jets/New Orleans was missed by most people, while Kansas City/San Diego was not correctly picked by anyone.

	We had 31 entries this week, making the pot $93. Currently in the lead is Robert Vargas, with only 6 games missed. No one else had 6 wrong, while Carter Ellis was the only one with 7 wrong. Robert picked Denver tonight, while Carter picked Oakland. Therefore, if Denver wins, Robert will win outright; if Oakland wins, then it will come down to the total points scored. Robert chose 49, while Carter choose 30. Therefore, if Oakland wins and there is 40 or more points, then Robert will win, 39 or less with Oakland, then Carter will win. Here are the number of games each person missed this week.

											Andy

Robert Vargas		6
Carter Ellis		7
Joe Step		8
Rick Broussard		8
Thomas Lowell		8
Russell Ballato		8
Daniel Muschar		8
Larry Campbell		8
Diana Allen		9
Reagan Mathews	9
Todd DeCook		9
Michele Wilks		9
Gautam Gupta		9
Jason Kaniss		9
Valerie Ramsower	9
Ryan Williams		9
Andy Pace		9
Joe Quenet		9
Bryce Schneider	9
Rob Benson		10
Kayne Coulter		10
Tom Chapman		10
Pat Hanse		10
Larry Jester		10
Ashish Mahajan		10
Paul Broderick		10
Jacob Shupe		10
Dave Ryan		11
Daniel Jenkins		11
Jaime Gualy		11
Dean Laurent		11


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000 05:56 PM -----

	Michael.Collins@ubsw.com
	12/27/2000 05:47 PM

		 To: sara.shackleton@enron.com, jeff.nogid@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: New draft trade confirmation

     Jeff and Sara,

     Please find attached a revised draft trade confirmation.

     You should note the most recent changes in a pink color in the
     document.

     Please call me with any questions.

     Mike Collins
     Executive Director
     Equity Risk Management
     UBS Warburg LLC
     203-719-8385 (phone)
     203-719-7031 (fax)

 - MARKUP.DOC

Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 04:22 PM -----

	Trena McFarland
	08/10/2000 10:04 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Lowry/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FX Transactions

file attached below
---------------------- Forwarded by Trena McFarland/LON/ECT on 10/08/2000
16:06 ---------------------------

Jon Barrett@MGLTD
07/08/2000 11:46
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Trena McFarland/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin Rhodes/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Sid
Tipples/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Alfred Pennisi/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Andrew
Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: FX Transactions

We received the attached from Sullivan & Cromwell re the FX business and the
possibilities of using a US companyn which company to use for contract
purposes. At a meeting here at MG today, the consensus/preference was not to
use a UK company as we have no full ISD (chapter 10) firm nor the wish to
change MG's status.

Per the advice from S&C, we like the idea of using a US corporation with a UK
"arranger" to cover any UK regulatory issues that arise. Dependent on where
the business will end up (I understand to be discussed by Gary Hickerson/Mike
Hutchinson 18th August), the following appears to be the among the logical
solutions:

1. Contractual entity - either Enron North America, MG London Inc or Newco
Inc.
2. Arranger - either EEFT Ltd, Metallgesellschaft Ltd or MG Brokers Ltd
(depending on the effect on their chapter 3 status for the last two).

The current customer base consists of entities in the US, Canada, France, UK
and Switzerland.

Please advise on any group/tax issues that can affect the final decision. If
you need any further information, please let me know.

Many thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD on
07/08/2000 15:59 ---------------------------

GILBERGD@sullcrom.com on 06/08/2000 15:45:55
To: jbarrett
cc: RAISLERK@sullcrom.com

Subject: FX Transactions

eSafe Protect Gateway (tm) has scanned this mail for viruses, vandals and
suspicious attachments and has found it to be CLEAN.

File: 62cy01!.DOC (38,400 bytes)
Encoding: Base64
Result: Clean.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Attached is a draft of the memo we discussed on the proposed FX business.
Please call or e-mail with any questions.  Best regards.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - 62cy01!.DOC


The expiry should be 2003, and it's been changed. Thanks for catching that.

Kate

	From:  Kimberly Allen                           02/22/2001 01:08 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Incorrect Expiry Date

Your so smart:) #522101.01

   Kate Symes                02/22/2001 02:59 PM

To: Kimberly Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Incorrect Expiry Date

I don't see a deal number.....? Is it a missing deal?

	From:  Kimberly Allen                           02/22/2001 12:58 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Incorrect Expiry Date

Kate, this trade has an expiry date of 2001 when it is suppose to be 2003.
Mike Driskil entered the trade. I have BPA's confirm that also verifies and
the notes in the bottom of the comment section. Please change if correct.

Thanks,

Kimberly


Attached are the minutes of the last conference call, along with two items on
transmission congestion pricing - the presentation Dan Allegretti briefed us
on, and a list of questions and answers about flowgate transmission pricing,
for background.

Please send me any agenda items you'd like to cover in the next meeting by
Monday, Oct. 2.

Mike

813-5219-4584


Mary:
Enclosed is the Counterparty form that we have come up with for Multi-Product
Guarantys.  Depending upon the products that need to be covered, each
Guaranty will need to be modified to make sure that it describes the proper
entities and products.  I will send along the Enron form of this shortly but
please pass this along to the appropriate people in the credit group.

Jeff, Stacy and Harry,
Are you going to change the Physical product form of Guaranty to look more
like this?  Power has changed their form and it may help for us to all be
consistent especially when we are asked to amend an existing Guaranty to
include more products.  If you do decide to amend your form, please send the
new form to credit.

Thanks for everyone's input.

Carol


Hi Mark,

The message at 10:47 says the the computer was rebooted at that time.  That
is about the only way that I know of that this message would be recorded.

When the TrbCurtail Service is started it does not remember what turbines
were curtailed.  It waits 10-minutes after starting before issuing any
commands to calculate a 10-minute average.  After the 10 minute startup wait,
the first command output from this program would have released all turbines
that were currently curtailed, and curtailed new turbines as needed to keep
the 10-minute average MW output at the curtailment setpoint.

So at 10:57 any turbines that were curtailed before that time would have been
released.
The curtailment log file Visupro creates at the turbine should be able to
verify this if needed
.

Database:

 System
Index Number Date/Time Msg
10843 840006029 6/19/02 10:36 Energy curtailed  -> Turbine curtailed
10847 840006250 6/19/02 10:47 TrbCurtail Service Started -> Computer rebooted
10855 840006029 6/19/02 10:47 Turbine Com Established -> Com established to
turbine

Joe

Mark Fisher
07/09/2002 03:07 PM
To: Joe Chapman/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Curtail200206.db Question

Joe,

Attached is the Curtail200206.db file. I have a question about a sequence of
events. For turbine 840006029 on June 19th the turbine is "Energy curtailed"
(Index = 10843), THEN it has the message "Turbine Com Established" (Index =
10855). Then there are no other messages (for that turbine) until a "Energy
curtailed" message (Index = 11134).

Is there anything I can assume about the time between the curtailment
messages? For example, was the turbine uncurtailed when the com established
message was recorded? Or are did the turbine become uncurtailed and no
message was recorded?

Thanks,
Mark


I know we overan SST in COH.  Our nom was lower, but the retro increased.
Alvin & Joanne were checking TCO. We are hoping they don't cut us and don't
want to tip them that they could.


what two words clear out a men's bathroom?

scroll down

nice dick


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	enron_update@concureworkplace.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-enron+5Fupdate+40concureworkplace+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:21 AM
To:	James Derrick Jr.
Subject:	<<Concur Expense Document>> - Lunches

The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by:  System
Expense Report Name: Lunches
Report Total: $132.36
Amount Due Employee: $132.36
Amount Approved: $132.36
Amount Paid: $0.00
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: Processed

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001 02:30 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>
03/14/2001 02:02 PM

To: <bhawkin@enron.com>, <bmerola@enron.com>, <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>,
<donna.fulton@enron.com>, <james.steffes@enron.com>,
<janelle.scheuer@enron.com>, <jeff_brown@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>,
<Mary.Hain@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>, <sarah.novosel@enron.com>,
<tom.hoatson@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FERC Show Cause Order

FERC has released a show cause Order directing Williams and AES to show why
they should not be found to have violated the Federal Power Act based on
certain outages at RMR plants in April and May of 2000.
The Commission's press release is available at:
http://www.ferc.fed.us/news1/pressreleases/prsrls1.htm.
The Order is available at:
http://cips.ferc.fed.us/Q/CIPS/MISC/M_MS/IN01-3.000.TXT.


Vince:  I apologize--I had emailed Shirley to let her know that Toni had
forwarded your email to me and that I would be handling this for you, but I
didn't copy you on the email.

Please call me with any questions,
Molly
x34804

Vince J Kaminski
10/18/2000 03:14 PM
To: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Interview for the Research Group

FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
03:21 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
10/18/2000 12:58 PM
To: Toni Graham/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Summers/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Interview for the Research Group

Hello everyone:

Vince would like to bring Jaesoo Lew in next week for an exploratory interview
with the Research Group.  The dates that would work best for us are:
Wednesday,
the 25th (AM), Thursday, 26th  (AM) and Friday, 27th (AM).  Please see if Mr.
Lew
is available for any of these times.

Thanks!

Shirley
3-5290

 - vitae2.doc

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
12:51 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
10/18/2000 12:29 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: position

Shirley,

I would like to  invite him to an interview next week. We should use his home
phone
number and/or private E-mail address.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
12:33 PM ---------------------------

"Jaesoo Lew" <pontgyn@hotmail.com> on 10/17/2000 09:59:01 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: position

Dear Dr. Kaminski

My name is Jaesoo Lew and I am referred by Dr. Wayne Lee.

Currently I've been working at Aquila Energy in Kansas City as an pricing
analyst since July 2000.  Since then, I have developed a natural gas storage
valuation model applying the swing options (forest method) pricing approach.
The price processes would be considered critical for the storage valuation
since a trinomial forest is required to value storage. Also the c++
programming using Excel DLL has been developed, too.

I attached my resume to this message for your consideration and am looking
forward to talking about an opportunity at Enron.

My home phone number is 913-649-0578, Dr. Kaminski, I will wait your call in
this week as Dr. Lee informed me.  If possible, please let me know your
expected calling day through the mail.  I appreciate your consideration.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Jaesoo Lew
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - vitae2.doc


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kingerski, Harry
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:09 PM
To:	Black, Don; Mihalik, Teresa; Des Champs, Joseph
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Ogenyi, Gloria
Subject:	Peoples Gas - IL

Peoples Gas has backed down from their request for a letter of credit to provide "Adequate Assurances of Payment", as stated in their tariff.  They will continue to accept a parental guaranty, which is due no later than December 3 (and which Teresa says is being processed).  The amount at issue is about $40k.

However, they are sending me a letter that will say, if there is any further downgrade in our rating, they will immediately require a l/c or cash deposit.


Ken:

Confirming our telephone discussion, Atlantic Richfield Co will be doing some maintenance on Monday Sep 10.  The pre-schedule for Monday will be 10 On Peak and 26 off peak.

On Monday morning, you will be bringing the unit down so you will buy from us as follows:

Buy From EPMI Real Time:  Real Time decs the gen schedule
HE 5 - 11 MW
HE 6 - 16 MW
HE 7 - 16 MW

Later that day you will be bringing the unit back up, generating more than your pre-schedule so you will sell to EPMI as follows:

Sell to EPMI Real TIme:  Real Time incs the gen schedule
HE 19 - 16 MW
HE 20 - 16 MW
HE 21 - 16 MW
HE 22 - 16 MW

Chris Foster
chris.h.foster@enron.com
(W) 503/464-3822
(Cell) 503/702-8568


I spoke with Dale Sanders at Williams today.  They seem very positive about the project at this point and have obviously spent a lot of money on right -of-way, regulatory filings, enviornmental and engineering work.  I had previously put this project at a very low probablility, especially with the 900 MM/d Kern expansion in 2003.  I did not think that they would be able to get Williams Marketing to take a substantial part of this capacity.  However, they are making the production company bear the costs of the capacity.  Obviously that is the key to Williams being able to have a shot at making this project a reality.

Williams is in negotiaitions to fill the other 175,000 mmbtu/d.  I have to put that probability at still fairly low, but stranger things have happened, especially if Williams decides to go at risk for some portion of the 540 MM/d.  Probably the entire project is still less than 50% but it is obviously something to monitor very closely.

If the project gets built it will substantially effect the basis market for CIG and Northwest.  Especially on the heels of the Kern River expansion. In addition, the Cheyenne market will definitely strengthen in the back years.

Call if you want to discuss or have other ideas about how to monitor these developments.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitt, Mark
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:54 PM
To:	Miller, Stephanie; Polsky, Phil; Tycholiz, Barry
Cc:	Bump, Dan J.; Lucci, Paul T.; Miller, Paul; Reitmeyer, Jay; Harrison, Tyrell
Subject:	RE: Western Frontier

Are they going to build it if it is not fully subscribed?  Or is Williams going to take the risk?  I wonder why Entergy is taking space?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Polsky, Phil
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	FW: Western Frontier

Mark,

Steph said you were looking for some info on the Western Frontier project that was in NGI today.  I called the contact person at Western Frontier/Williams and he told me that the project was not in fact fully subscribed.  He was obviously interested in speaking with you again.

I glanced through their filing, and apparently the open season led to PAs for 365,000 Dth/d of the 540,000 Dth/d of available capacity.  PA  have been signed with the following:

Marathon - 75,000 dth/d
Williams Marketing - 200,000 dth/d
Utilicorp United - 15,000 dth/d
Entergy - 75,000 dth/d

With the exception of Marathon, everyone signed up for ten years.  Marathon committed to five years, with an option to extend for two years.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Phil

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Sanders, Dale T." <Dale.T.Sanders@Williams.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:27 PM
To:	Polsky, Phil
Subject:	Western Frontier

Phil,
Here is the information that you requested.  If I can be of any other assistance, please do not hesitate to call.
 <<Electronic Version for e-mail.doc>>  <<WFSYSMAP_1.jpg>>  <<WFSYSMAP_1.pdf>>  <<WFrontierfiling.dot>>
Dale T. Sanders
Williams Gas Pipeline-SouthCentral/ Western Frontier
Project Manager-Business Development
Phone:   270-688-6944
Fax:      270-688-6320
)  e-mail:   <mailto:dale.t.sanders@williams.com << File: Electronic Version for e-mail.doc >>

 - Electronic Version for e-mail.doc << File: WFSYSMAP_1.jpg >>
 - WFSYSMAP_1.jpg << File: WFSYSMAP_1.pdf >>
 - WFSYSMAP_1.pdf << File: WFrontierfiling.dot >>
 - WFrontierfiling.dot


Pls see email from IBJ with my comments in red.  I look forward to receiving
your respective input where indicted.
Thanks heaps to both of you.

Jane McBride

I am also attaching my memorandum to them.

----- Forwarded by Jane McBride/AP/Enron on 11/09/2000 03:34 PM -----

	"Teruyo Suzuki" <teruyo.suzuki@ibjbank.co.jp>
	11/08/2000 08:49 PM

		 To: <Jane.McBride@enron.com>
		 cc: "Yamato Konishi" <yamato.konishi@ibjbank.co.jp>
		 Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

Dear Jane,
Reviewing your comments, our current position is as follows.

Part 1

(b) US$50,000,000

Basically our company_fs guideline for the Threshold Amount is US$1,000,000
but it seems very small for significant customers and we can change it to
US$10,000,000.   As this amount is usually agreed in the Master Agreement
with major commercial banks, we hope this is acceptable to you, too.

John - is there any way we can accept this?  I think it is going to be
difficult to get them to agree so, if you still can't accept it, is there any
way you can agree to the 10 million limit if at the same time something else
is changed?

(g)  As for (1), we would like to add _gthe obligations of such resulting,
surviving, or transferee entity hereunder are guaranteed by Enron Corp._h in
5th line
after _gEnron Corp._h  IBJ could accept to continue the Transactions with
the counterparty when it merges with the other company and becomes
materially weaker if the surviving company is guaranteed by Enron Corp.

Sara - Do you think we can accept this? We would not be agreeing necessarily
to give a corporate guarantee, but instead would have the option of putting
one in place to avoid a default.  If the concept is OK on your side, I think
we should add "hereunder" as indicted above or something to restrict the
obligations which need to be guaranteed.

Sara, I would also like to add a ")" after "party" at the end of line 4 of
paragraph (g) of Part 1 of the Schedule.  OK?

Regarding (2), please delete it because it refers to Credit Support Annex
which we are not going to enter into for the time being

Sara - the question is whether we just delete the language or replace it with
something else.  The second option would be better and given the discretion Y
would have in this situation IBJ should not object provided the drafting
works. Do you have any ideas of anything which would work within the
framework of the rest of the schedule and the master?  The final sentence
should go anyway I guess.

John - I guess you may need to consider above with Sara.

(h) Agreed.

(k) Agreed.

Part 3

Regarding further document for certification, we can include the following
language.
_gAny certificate or document reasonably requested by the other party
evidencing or certifying that the execution, delivery and performance of
this Agreement by the party requested has been duly authorized_h

I think this sounds OK.

As for annual report, we will revert to you.

John - As you can see from my memo, as a starting point, I have asked them to
tell us what they have available re financials and will revert when I hear
back from them to see what you think.

Part 4
(a)  Agreed.

(f) Even if there are 20 Transactions between us which settle on the same
day, our operation can not net the payment of the same currency.  Our system
does not allow the payment netting of more than one Transaction.

John - They want to delete "not" from this provision.  I think we need to
assume that they are telling us the truth and that they just can't do it.
The question is then, do we delete "not" or do we delete the entire paragraph
(f) from Part 4 of the schedule.  Pls let me know what you want to
do.'

(h)  New York Branch address

 1251 Avenue of The Americas, New York, NY 10020, U.S.A.

Part 5

(a) When an option buyer who fully paid the premium goes bankrupt, we
believe it will be more practicable that the other party (option seller)
terminate a transaction according to Section 6(a) and pay the amount payable
under Section 6(e), if any, to the option buyer.  If option seller does not
terminate the transaction, it sounds unnatural that the option seller pay
the remaining payment  on each payment date to the receiver of the
defaulting party (option buyer). _@We do not usually include the safety net
provision for a technical default.  Even if payment default due to
operational error, there is ample (three days) grace period for nonpayment
party after receiving the notice of non-payment by the other party.

Sara - what do you think, how flexible do you think we can be on this?

(e) Agreed.

(g)  I understand the benefit that non-defaulting party could setoff its
Affiliate_fs obligation against defaulting party_fs obligation.    But in
Japan only setoff between the parties who entered into the Agreement is
allowed.   If you know the case that in any country an applicable law
permits to setoff the amount owed by the non-defaulting party_fs Affiliate
against the amount owed by the defaulting party, please let us know.

Sara - any comments?  I am checking whether what they saying about Japanese
law is true.

(h)   As we should also obtain our Credit Department_fs approval of credit
line for the transferee before agreeing the transfer, we would like to
insert the following words at the end of a new Section 7(c).

_gAnd provided, further, that the transferring party has notified
non-transferring party of the proposed transfer and the non-transferring
party has not objected to the proposed transfer within 20 days of such
notification, it being understood that the sole grounds for objection shall
be the non-transferring party_fs good faith belief that the proposed
transfer would give rise to an adverse tax, regulatory or, legal or internal
credit policy consequences or material credit concerns to the
non-transferring party, or that necessary internal credit approval has not
been granted_h

Sara - As noted in my memo to them, I had thought we may be willing to add to
the end of this paragraph "and provided that the transfer does not cause any
adverse tax consequences for the other party in relation to which the
transferring party is not willing to indemnify the other party."  They have
asked us to go far further than this now and I am not sure that we should be
willing to agree to anything after "legal" in line 6 given that the guarantee
provision should give their credit department comfort.

Part 6

We can accept (a), (b) and (e) but cannot agree with (c),(d),(f),(g) and
(h).

Sara - your thoughts?

If you have any question or uncertainty about the above items, please let
me know.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Teruyo Suzuki
Industrial Bank of Japan
813-3214-3872
813-5200-7427


For calendar.  I may go straight there in the am.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/14/2001 03:28
PM ---------------------------

Laura Dudley@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/14/2001 02:45 PM
To: Peter.D'Alessandro@enron.com., Kay.Mann@enron.com,
Mark.Bernstein@enron.com, Ray Danner/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott
Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark
Brand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Allan Karels/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Robert Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, Randy Pais/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Cheryl Kent/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: CO - OP CITY

Subject:  CO-OP City, Short Fuse on Capex & O & M Numbers

Please meet in 3AC420 (Dodsons previous conference room) on Thursday, March
15th from 9am to 10am  with Scott Laidlaw.

Thank You
x66000 or
Cheryl Kent @ x66096


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 09/14/2000 04:18
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Lexi Elliott @ ENRON                           09/12/2000 01:05 PM

To: Stan Dowell/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Atkinson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Coats/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Ethan Schultz/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Alejandro Hernandez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Rogers
Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, David Shields/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter
N Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Swank/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Layne/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marshall
Eubank/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Maestas/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Davoli/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Deirdre McCaffrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, TJ Rylander/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Priya Jaisinghani/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jonathan Roumel/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Todd Van Roten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Chuck Randall/HOU/EES@EES,
Brad Alford/ECP/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Henderson/HOU/EES@EES, Mark
Courtney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derryl Cleaveland/NA/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Abbott/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mo Bawa/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Chris Loehr/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Pyke/AP/Enron@Enron, Ken Tate/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, John King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hans Oliver
Pereira/HOU/EES@EES, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tamara
Hopkins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Cunningham/HOU/EES@EES, Mark McConnell/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Ronnie Shields/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen
Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Justin
O'Malley/HOU/EES@EES, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Maloy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rafael Avila/HOU/EES@EES, Nate Blackburn/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark E
Lindsey/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cedric
Burgher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick L Carson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Marshall Eubank/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Lynne Ruffer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Confer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lanette Earnest/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Cole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christopher
Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Yang/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Leon Branom/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Zeina El-Azzi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christine
Milliner/Houston/Eott@Eott, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Millie
Gautam/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Donna Hutton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Enron Presentation

Dear Recruiting Team Members:

I am forwarding a copy of the Enron presentation to each of you for review.
Some of you will be asked to do presentations, many will not.  I just wanted
to send it out to various team members in order to give you an idea of our
marketing strategy and information on campus.  This is simply for your
information.  When this presentation is given, it will include  dates
tailored specifically for each campus based on the dates I have set up
through career services.

Have a great day!

Lexi Elliott
3-4585


Hi Jay,
I thought I'd send you some lite reading.  May provide a distraction for you
from your normal day.  This is a first hand account I received from Capt
Greider. He didn't (couldn't?) go into detail in some areas I would be
interested in, but at least it is the true story and account.  Suprisingly
not a whole lot different than the media reported.  The ROC vs PROC point
was interesting.  Shows the thought process of an insecure government.
Anyway enjoy.
Dad

AN INSIDE LOOK AT THE CHINA RESCUE MISSION
April 12, 2001
By Captain Guy Greider
Continental Airlines
Since the mid-air collision on April 1, 2001 between a U.S.  Navy EP-3
surveillance aircraft and a Chinese jet fighter, I had watched the news with
mild interest.  This was mostly due to the proximity of Guam to China.  I
never dreamed that I would play a role in this intensely watched
international drama.
Somewhere in the negotiations between the United States and the Chinese
Governments, it was decided that a civilian aircraft should be sent to
retrieve the 24 crewmembers being detained on Hainan Island, China.  A call
was made to Continental Airlines headquarters in Houston, Texas.
Continental was chosen because of its Guam base and its ability to launch
this kind of operation at a moment s notice.  From there, the operation took
shape through the tireless efforts of many people working behind the scenes
in a coordinated effort between the airline, the military, and the State
Department.
On Saturday, April 7, 2001, I received a call at home from Captain Ralph
Freeman, Continental Micronesia Director of Flight Operations.  Ralph told
me that the military wanted to charter one of our jets to conduct a rescue
mission and asked if I would be one of the crewmembers.  I said yes without
hesitation.
Later we were told that we would need to get passport pictures taken in case
the Chinese Government required visas.  We got the required photos and were
under the impression that we would leave immediately.  However, the
negotiations slowed over the demand from the Chinese that the U.S.  issue an
apology that the U.S.  was unwilling to give.  Meanwhile, the Continental
crew remained on call 24 hours a day.  Our Uniforms were laid out and our
bags were packed and waiting by the door.
On Wednesday evening April 11, 2001, at about 6:30 PM Ralph called again to
say that the two parties were very close to an agreement to release the U.S.
crew and to come to the airport.  Upon arrival, we were given a briefing
sheet listing the information that we would need to conduct the flight.
We would carry a Repatriation Team consisting of Navy, Marine Corps, and Air
Force specialists, 14 people in all.  Doctors, Psychologists, and
communications people with lots of gear showed up on the ramp near the
airplane, ready to board.  They were all dressed in casual civilian clothes.
The 155-seat jet was fitted with 2 full stretcher kits bolted in over rows
of seats complete with Oxygen tanks and I.V.  bottles.  They did not know
the condition of the
24 detained crewmembers and they were not going to take any chances.  They
were prepared.
When our crew was fully assembled, it consisted of 11 people.  2 pilots to
fly the jet and an extra to provide relief because of the extensive flight
time involved.
They were Captain Tom Pinardo, Captain Pierre Frenay and I.  We also carried
5 very experienced Flight Attendants.
They were Debbie Percell, Susanne Hendricks, Jean Tang, Cynthia Iverson, and
Beverly Haines.  Our 2 onboard mechanics were Peter Lum and Julius Aguilo.
Our load planner was Mike Torres.
At about 9:30 PM we received a call asking that we arrive in China no
earlier than 6:00 AM, just about sunrise.  It was obvious that the entire
exchange would be photographed and they wanted daylight conditions.  We
estimated that a 2:15 AM departure from Guam would put us on the ground in
Haikou precisely at 6:00 AM local China time.  (2 hours earlier than Guam)
Some of us just stayed on the plane, others accepted the company s
invitation to come to the Continental President s Club, a local VIP lounge
at the airport to try to get some rest.  It was difficult to get any rest
with our much-anticipated mission so near.
By 1:00 AM the pilots were back in the briefing room going over the weather,
flight plan, fuel requirements and everything else that goes into a flight.
Again, we loaded up the airplane and finally departed Guam International at
precisely 2:15 AM.
The stretcher kits and medical gear were not the only special additions to
the airplane.  The company had loaded a special file into the navigation
database of the flight management computer (FMC).  This allowed us to gain
access to navigation data needed to operate in this part of China, which is
not in our normal route structure.  The Repatriation Team carried
sophisticated equipment to communicate with the military and government
officials that would monitor our progress throughout the flight.
The route of flight took us straight west from Guam toward the Philippines
along the G467 airway.  About half way across we turned north directly
toward Hong Kong.
This routing was designed to avoid flying through Taiwanese airspace,
something that the Chinese could consider offensive.
Approaching the Chinese coastline, we contacted Hong Kong radar control.
After establishing radar contact with us, the controller gave us a short cut
to expedite his traffic flow.  This was bad because it cut off considerable
distance and would result in arriving too early.  We compensated by slowing
our airspeed until the computer again estimated a 6:00 AM arrival.  The
instant we turned across the short cut, the interphone rang from the back of
the plane.  They wanted to know why we had deviated from the flight plan.
We told them it was due to Hong Kong traffic and that we had adjusted our
airspeed.
We were still on schedule.
Now we were approaching our destination, Haikou airport on Hainan Island.
Captain Pierre Frenay was at the controls.  The weather was 2000-ft overcast
with 5 miles visibility and light winds out of the east.  Pierre made an ILS
approach to and landed on runway 9.  Haikou airport is much the same as many
other airports in the world that serve jet transport aircraft.  It has an
11,000-ft runway with standard lighting and navigational facilities.  We
touched down at 6:07 AM.  The first early morning light was beginning to
illuminate the sky.
The local air traffic controller instructed us to follow a vehicle that was
beside us on an adjacent taxiway.  He led us to a remote part of the
airport, away from the main terminal buildings.  Once we had parked and shut
down the engines, we saw many uniformed Chinese military personnel and
vehicles.  They did not appear to have weapons.  Portable stairs were
brought up to the airplane and we opened the main cabin door.
The Repatriation Team that we carried had been briefed to close down all of
their communications equipment prior to landing and put it away.  They were
also briefed to remain in their seats in a non-threatening posture in case
the Chinese military came aboard.  The first and only person to come aboard
was an Air China employee.  He spoke English and was to act as the
translator between our group and the Chinese military.  He instructed us to
have everyone fill out both arrival and departure documents.
He collected all of our passports and left the aircraft.
Before he left, he said that only one person at a time would be allowed to
deplane.
Peter Lum, one of our mechanics went down to supervise the re-fueling and
servicing of the airplane.  When that was complete, I went down to do the
walk-around inspection.  I did this rather slowly because I wanted to have a
chance to look around.  While I was out on the ramp, a skirmish developed
between people who were trying to climb a wall to photograph our aircraft
and the Chinese police.  Somehow, CNN managed to carry our arrival and
departure live.
Once the airplane was serviced and ready to go, we looked anxiously around
for any sign of the buses that carried our 24 detainees.  Before that could
happen however, we had a problem to deal with.  A U.S.  military General who
was on the scene to assist in the transfer came storming up the stairs and
demanded to speak with the Captain.  Tom Pinardo responded.  The General
said that the entire mission was now in jeopardy.  A document called the
general declaration, which is standard on all international flights had
listed the destination as Haikou, China R.O.C.  The initials ROC stand for
Republic of China which is ..  Taiwan!  The Chinese were very upset over
this.  Tom quickly crossed out ROC and replaced it with P.R.O.C.  the
Peoples Republic of China.  This seemed to satisfy them.
With the airplane ready to go and the paperwork complete,
2 buses pulled up and the 24 U.S.  service men and women saluted as they
bolted up the stairs and settled into the back of the plane.  When the last
one was aboard, our passports were returned to us.  The stairs were
withdrawn, the cabin door closed, and we started the engines and departed.
It was my turn at the controls.
Once airborne heading straight south we broke through the clouds into the
bright sunshine.  Pierre made a PA announcement that we were over
international waters and leaving Chinese airspace.  A great cheer rose from
the back of the airplane.  A short while later we received a telephone patch
over the HF radio from Mr.  Joseph Prueher, U.S Ambassador to China.  He
wanted to speak with Lt.  Shane Osborne the 26 year old EP-3 Aircraft
Commander.  Lt.  Osborne came to the cockpit and put on a headset.  The
Ambassador told him that on behalf of the President of the United States and
the entire country he wanted to say welcome home .  He went on to say how
proud he was of everything the crew had done from their airmanship in saving
the lives of the crew and aircraft, to their conduct on the ground once they
had been detained.  They had truly done an excellent job.
After his conversation with the Ambassador, Lt.  Osborne stayed in the
cockpit for quite a while and told us his story pilot to pilot of what had
happened during and immediately after the mid-air collision with the F-8
Chinese fighter.  The fighter came up under their left wing.  This pilot
made 2 very close passes previously that day.  He apparently misjudged the
intercept and his vertical stabilizer struck the outboard left propeller on
the EP-3.  The U.S.  plane was in straight and level flight on autopilot at
the time.
The fighter broke into two pieces and plunged into the sea.  The U.S.  plane
rolled to the left almost inverted, the pilot lost control and they began to
lose altitude.
The Chinese fighter had raked back across the fuselage and knocked off the
nose cone causing the aircraft to buffet wildly.  When the nose cone
departed the aircraft it collided with and damaged the number 4 propeller on
the right wing.  The collision punctured the pressure vessel and the EP-3
depressurized.  The collision also knocked off the pitot tubes eliminating
airspeed and altitude indications in the cockpit.  It also knocked off the
forward bracket for the HF radio antenna.  The antenna then flew back and
wrapped around the tail.
We were almost upside down and totally out of control Osborne told us.  The
dive continued and some crew members donned parachutes.  At about 8,000
feet, Osborne regained straight and level flight.  They considered ditching
the aircraft in the South China Sea but dismissed that option because it was
certain to result in loss of life.  They headed for the nearest land, Hainan
Island.  The U.S.  crew now faced the most difficult landing of their lives.
They made numerous mayday, mayday, mayday radio calls on internationally
recognized emergency frequencies.  The Chinese did not respond.  Somehow,
they managed to get the airplane on the ground.
Their next immediate task was to destroy the sensitive electronic
surveillance equipment aboard the EP-3.
Meanwhile the Chinese military had approached the aircraft in vehicles and
were yelling at them through loudspeakers to deplane.  The next 11 days
would be a very uncertain time for them.
When we met them, they told us that they had not been abused or mistreated.
Their food was adequate and plentiful.  Sort of like eating in a Chinese
restaurant every day one of them said.  On the forth day, they got some
coffee.  On the fifth day, some cokes were provided.
The crew did not know what kind of transport would be provided for their
return home.  They were pleased and surprised to see a chartered airliner
from the United States.
The rest of the flight from Haikou to Anderson AFB on Guam was uneventful.
During the 5 hour flight the crew was treated to the movie Men of Honor and
enjoyed a first class meal.  We did not know it at the time but our landing
at Anderson AFB was carried live on national television.
We taxied to the parking ramp at Anderson where many people had turned out
to welcome all of us home.


Martin,

Please, ask Steve to call your office.
I may be late on Friday. I don't have to be present at
this conference call. Please, talk about your potential
involvement and if takes a trip to London it's OK with me.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
08:25 AM ---------------------------

Steven Leppard
01/10/2001 05:36 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Phone conference

Guys

I've booked a room for a phone conference with you at 8am Friday.  Please
advise of the number to call if not Vince's office.

Steve


[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]          [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]        [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]             [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]         [IMAGE]      [IMAGE] [IMAGE]             [IMAGE]             [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]        [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]             [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]             [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]             [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]       [IMAGE]     [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]
 Please enter PROMOTION Code LXRS3 at checkout when shopping at www.fao.com   or 1.800.876.7867. You may also print this email and bring it to one of  our FAO  Schwarz Stores . This offer is not valid at the Glendale,  Sacramento, and Sunset Stores. Excludes electronics and videos.This offer  cannot be combined with any other coupon or discount. Limit one coupon per  order or visit. Not valid for prior purchases. Applicable taxes, handling,  shipping, oversize item fees, special order fees and gift wrap are extra.  Offer expires 2/17/02. Offer subject to change or termination without  notice.   If you do not wish to receive future emails from RightStart.com, please click here  and we will make every effort to respect your request in accordance with our Privacy  Policy .


Attached are summaries of five recent advice letters.? AL2048-E,  dealing
with the value of PG&E's hydro facilities, should be reviewed.?  AL2049-E,
dealing with TCBA and GABA credits, may be of interest.
?
Dan
 - 10-28-00 PG&E AL Summary Chart.doc


Please review the attached outage report.

Jerry Graves
713-345-893


As promised, we're forwarding the EOL agreements reviewed by Baker & McKenzie.

Regards,
Nony Flores


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
11:15 AM ---------------------------

	Invitation
Chairperson: Chris Gaskill
Sent by: Amanda Huble

Start: 09/27/2000 04:00 PM
End: 09/27/2000 05:00 PM

Description: Meeting to discuss PGM and  Fundamentals in EB3084.

This meeting repeats   starting on    (if the date occurs on a weekend the
meeting ).
Meeting Dates:

Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT
Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT

Detailed description:


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/06/2001 02:05 PM -----

>

 - SB 1X letter.doc


Room 3267 at 2:30.  My phone number is 7031.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Massey II, John
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 3:09 PM
To:	Grigsby, Mike
Subject:	RE: Coal

sounds good - let me know the location

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 1:32 PM
To:	Massey II, John
Subject:	RE: Coal

Would you like to sit down with a group of traders from the west gas desk?  Should you bring along the guy who sent us the coal plants, Aaron Martinsen?  Tomorrow afternoon around 2:30.

Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Massey II, John
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 9:52 AM
To:	Grigsby, Mike
Subject:	Coal

Mike -

Enjoyed briefly talking to you yesterday - If you want to sit and talk more about coal - Just let me know -

Thanks

John Massey


Mark

I have learned that the time stamp is not our own but Reuters--so it is the
time of the last trade.  I assume, then, that it's okay to give people that
additional information as long as we have the quotes delayed by 20 minutes
disclaimer?

Thanks Mark

Jay

From: Mark Taylor on 28/06/2000 11:05 CDT
To: James Bruce/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Time Stamp on Stock Quotes

Will the Reuters feed contain a time stamp?  Some other sites let you know
what  time the trade was done that resulted in the quote.

	James Bruce
	06/28/2000 08:03 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Time Stamp on Stock Quotes

Dear Mark

Do you know of any legal issue that there could be about adding our own time
stamp to a stock quote from Reuters (so that people viewing the site would
know when the stock quotes were last updated by us)?

Let me know if I should direct this question to someone else.

Thanks Mark

Jay


Luis,

Please see the attachment.  This file shows deals that still need adjustment
stemming from the base gas program being kicked off for Dec.  Please have
these corrected also.  Thanks.

The "arranged_quantity" column contains the correct volume.

Daren


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001 09:13 AM -----

	Walter Guidroz@ENRON
	02/02/2001 12:07 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approval list, 2-2-01

Please see attached.


When Colstrip goes down we will be short at Montana system and long at PGE System.  We need to buy a transmission wheel from BPA (Account#736780) from PGE System to the Montana System Border.  If need be we can also do a Buy-Resale with WWP to move the energy from PGE Sys/Mid-C/LOLO to the Montana System Border.  The method for documentation and cleaning up enpower are below.

1.) In enpower, build an index forward buy from PGE under LTNW book for the total amount of mws cut due to colstrip going down.  Use the DOW JONES MIDC index (remember to specify in the index if it is on or off-peak).  Enter an offset of .10  .

2.) Enter a transmission deal from BPA.   (MIDC to MPC SYS)  The transmission fee is $2.52

3.) Go into deal scheduling and query  under the counterparty PGE.  Select all

4.) Bring up all deals of the counterparties involved at Colstrip---- specifically, Ashgrove,Conocpil, Energywesr, Louisiana Pacific, and Smurfit Stone, etc.
	(these enpower deal numbers can be located under the counterparties name in lotus notes.)

5.)Zero out the buy from PGE @MPC SYS

6.) Finally link the deals.

7.) Check real time postion manager, make sure you are flat.

If you have questions regarding this procedure please let me know.
Thanks,
Bill


Attached you will find the weekly report for the week ending for May 11, 2001.

Saludos


HOUSTON - Enron Corp. hosted its annual equity analyst conference today in
Houston.  Ken Lay, Enron chairman and chief executive officer, opened the
conference by highlighting Enron,s tremendous growth across all businesses
and the outstanding 700 percent return to shareholders over the past decade.
Enron presented key objectives for 2000:
? Continued strong growth in the core Wholesale Energy businesses.
? Break-out performance from Retail Energy Services.
? Rapid development of Enron Broadband Services.

Enron,s ability to extend core skills and competencies to new markets was a
recurring theme throughout the day.

Wholesale Energy Business
Growth prospects remain strong for Wholesale Energy Operations and Services,
Enron,s largest business.  Wholesale energy growth in North America is
expected to be driven by the continuing deregulation of power markets in the
United States and large-scale energy outsourcing by utilities and large
energy consumers.  Enron expects to continue to broaden its early lead across
the European continent as markets quickly open to competition.  Finally,
Enron is rapidly expanding its wholesale presence in other markets such as
Japan, where large customers will be permitted to choose their electricity
provider in March 2000.
EnronOnline will provide additional wholesale growth as incremental sales are
generated through this innovative, Internet-based transaction system.  Over
450 customers around the world have used EnronOnline and over 10,000
transactions have been completed since its introduction in late November
1999.  Yesterday, EnronOnline transaction levels reached a new record with
over 700 transactions, representing a notional value of $250 million.
Transaction processing costs with EnronOnline are significantly lower than
costs associated with traditional transaction methods.
Enron,s Gas Pipeline Group is also well positioned to continue growing, with
expansions planned or underway on several of its systems.

Retail Energy Services
With over 16,500 facilities under management, the infrastructure is in place
to service customers worldwide.  As the strong contracting momentum
continues, Enron Energy Services is poised to rapidly increase earnings in
2000.  Enron Energy Services, goal for 2000 is to sign new contracts
representing $16 billion in future expenditures by customers for energy and
energy services, nearly double the level in 1999.

Enron Broadband Services
The new name of Enron,s communications business, Enron Broadband Services,
reflects its role in the very fast growing market for premium broadband
services.  Enron is deploying an open, flexible global broadband network
controlled by software intelligence, which precludes the need to invest in a
traditional point-to-point fiber network.  This Enron Intelligent Network is
widely interconnected to both other wholesale bandwidth carriers and to
Internet service providers, thus providing the platform for two new Enron
business centers, bandwidth intermediation and broadband content delivery.
A direct transfer of Enron,s core market making and risk management skills
from its energy businesses, bandwidth intermediation will provide
capacity-holders a vast array of alternatives for flexible, low cost
capacity.  Enron will also provide premium broadband content services, such
as high-quality video-streaming and large broadband file transfer, with
differentiated levels of quality in a usage-based business model.
As announced in a separate release, Enron also reached an agreement with Sun
Microsystems that provides for accelerated development of broadband Internet
services.
Enron is one of the world,s leading electricity, natural gas and
communications companies.  The company, which owns approximately $34 billion
in energy and communications assets, produces electricity and natural gas,
develops, constructs and operates energy facilities worldwide, delivers
physical commodities and financial and risk management services to customers
around the world, and is developing an intelligent network platform to
facilitate online business.  Enron,s Internet address is www.enron.com, and
the stock is traded under the ticker symbol, &ENE.8
##
This press release includes forward looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Although Enron believes that its expectations are based
on reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its goals will be
achieved.  Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in the forward looking statements herein include
political developments in foreign countries, the ability to penetrate new
wholesale and retail natural gas, electricity and broadband services markets,
including the energy outsource market, in the United States and Europe, the
timing and extent of changes in prices for crude oil, natural gas,
electricity and those relating to broadband services and content, the timing
and effect of changes in interest rates, the timing and success of Enron,s
efforts to develop domestic and international power, pipeline,
communications, internet-related and other infrastructure projects, and
conditions of the capital markets and equity markets during the periods
covered by the forward looking statements.


Attached is the presentation that Jeff reviewed last week in the meeting.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT on 06/27/2000
08:39 PM ---------------------------

Jeff Johnson@ENRON
06/19/2000 05:34 PM
To: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura E Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth M
Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regan M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
laray.odum@luminant.com, nadeem.abbasi@luminant.com, Scott
Williamson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul F Poellinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Simmons/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Hanz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Angelina V Lorio/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Paskin/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Wed Unify Mtg 2:00 - 2 Allen Center, 12th floor conf room

Please note that the Wed meeting will be held as planned from 2:00-4:00PM in
the 2 Allen Center in the 12th floor Forum conference room.
The room entrance is just off the elevator bank foyer.

Here is the draft of the presentation that we will discuss on Wednesday. We
are interested in your input and feedback in the meeting on Wednesday.

Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron on 06/19/2000
05:20 PM ---------------------------

Alarm enabled: an alarm will occur  on 06/21/2000 01:55 PM
	Calendar Entry

Brief description:
Date:
Time:

Unify System -- Problems and Proposed Immediate Projects. Two Allen Center,
12th floor forum
06/21/2000
02:00 PM - 04:00 PM

Detailed description:

The meeting will be held in Two Allen Center on the 12th floor in the large
conference room (called the Forum). The room entrance is just off the
elevator bank in the foyer.

We believe that we have an approach to immediately begin to address key
performance issues in the Unify system.
To be successful with the proposed projects, we need your input, sponsorship
and participation. Angie Lorio will find a location and will publish as soon
as possible.

The proposed agenda is as follows:

I. UNIFY --  Current State, Strengths, Issues
II. Conceptual Overview Of Proposed Solutions
Organization Building
Performance Monitoring Team
Sybase 12 Upgrade
SQL Server Testing
Middle Tier Rearchitecture Project
Scoping For A Re-Write Effort
III. Solutions Proposals / Plans For Immediate Review / Kickoff
Proposed Scope
Assumptions
High Timelines / Cost Estimates
Staffing
IV. Facilitated Discussion On Unify
Future Growth / Changes Required For Unify
New Project Prioritization

Invitations have been sent to: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Laura E Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D
Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regan M
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, laray.odum@luminant.com, nadeem.abbasi@luminant.com, Scott
Williamson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul F Poellinger/HOU/ECT@ECT
Optional invitees: Chris Hanz/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Simmons/NA/Enron@Enron,
Angie Lorio
_________________________________________________________________________
This meeting repeats   starting on    (if the date occurs on a weekend the
meeting ).


PLEASE READ FULL MESSAGE TO LEARN HOW TO GET 1,000 FREE CHANCES AT THE
$92,000,000.00 POWERBALL for Saturday, January 26, 2002!

Nobody won PowerBall on Wednesday BUT twelve lucky FreeLotto Players did win $21,000,000.00 in Jackpots! That's really no surprise when you consider that the odds of winning Classic FreeLotto's  $1,000,000.00 Grand Prize are far better than winning PowerBall. In fact, all but their SuperBucks game have better odds than PowerBall.

http://www.freelotto.com/offer.asp?offer=24365

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://i.pm0.net/remove?funnymoney:10
* Enter your email address (Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "funnymoney:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>

pmguid:1c.1gm3.803w8


John,

Thanks for your help with Husnain.  I think he will be a solid asset for EBS

As for the "trade", I do not think that I should be brokering a personnel
deal like that without the individual's input.  However, I would definitely
encourage you to talk to any of my people that you would like to have.    I
have an open door policy, if they want to pursue other internal jobs.

After speaking with you last week, it was very clear to me that you were
unsatisfied (unhappy) with my failure to be specific about individuals that I
was recruiting.  I will not make that mistake again.  I would ask only that
you inform Jim or myself of the individuals that you would want to recruit.

Additionally,  I think that you and Kevin Hannon have spoken about an
exchange program in which our junior commercial people would be able to
rotate through a transaction intensive trading group.  I think this type of
program could be mutually beneficial and I would appreciate if we could talk
about this in greater detail.

Regards,

Paul

	John J Lavorato@ENRON
	08/24/00 08:47 AM

		 To: Paul Racicot/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Kevin Presto
		 Subject:

Paul

The fellow in Andea Reed's group is all yours.

P.S.  How is our trade coming along.


Outlook Migration Team
05/14/2001 01:02 PM
To:	Elena Chilkina/Enron@EnronXGate, Jose Marquez/Enron@EnronXGate, Kevin G Moore/Enron@EnronXGate, Mike A Roberts/Enron@EnronXGate, Tony Hamilton/EU/Enron@Enron, William Smith/Enron@EnronXGate, Alan McGaughy/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy Burrell/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, James Posway/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Maritta Mullet/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Michael Mitcham/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Brian Swinford/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Jones/GasPlant/TS/ECT@ECT, Bob Brandt/NA/Enron@Enron, Charles Upshaw/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harvey Mitchell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Henry Terech/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Thomas/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken N Byrd/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Gray/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rusty Gourley/NA/Enron@Enron, Stan Jablonski/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tara Soyal/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adrian Ausucua/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Zatarain/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carol Howes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Denise Almoina/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Denka Wangdi/NA/Enron@Enron, Eduardo Robles/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elio Tortolero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Felicia Legier/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Felipe Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON, Frances Reese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jana L Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joy Oliver/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kari Duncan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith Sparks/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lisa B Alderman/NA/Enron@Enron, Maria Alejandra Romero/SA/Enron@Enron, Mariella Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rudolf Bond/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sean Long/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve Jernigan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve Hirsh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Timothy B Rebhorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Veronica Medrano/NA/Enron@ENRON, Veronica Perez/NA/Enron@Enron, Wendi Hoelscher/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Yen Nguyen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tamara Carter/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Wood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nikita Ford/NA/Enron@Enron, Amy Villasenor/OTS/Enron@Enron, Debra Young/OTS/Enron@Enron, Jeff Arnold/OTS/Enron@ENRON, John Reese/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Josh Mayes/OTS/Enron@Enron, Larry Fenstad/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mark Adleman/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ann Johnson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Lynne Dix/OTS/Enron@Enron, Mike Thomas/OTS/Enron@Enron, Morris Brassfield/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rinetia Turner/OTS/Enron@Enron, Robert Geheb/OTS/Enron@Enron, Tyrone Brown/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Billy Dorsey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Earl Hailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lena Lacey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Office of the Chairman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally Keepers/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Suzanne Danz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tori L Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bridget Fraser/NY/ECT@ECT, John Haggerty/Corp/Enron@Enron, Murdoch Morrison/NY/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL 5-16-01

Current Notes User:

To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook, it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of migration.  Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following survey. Double Click on document to put it in "Edit" mode. When you finish, simply click on the 'Reply With History' button then hit 'Send'  Your survey will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.

Thank you.

Outlook 2000 Migration Team

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Full Name:        Jeffrey K. Skilling

Login ID:  jskilli

Extension:  x3-6894

Office Location:  EB5007

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop,  Laptop,  Both)  Desktop

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot, Jornada)  Yes, Palm Pilot

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?  No
    If yes, who?

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?  Yes
    If yes, who?  Sherri Sera, Joannie Williamson
Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?  No
    If yes, who?

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?  Yes
    If yes, who?  Sherri Sera, Joannie Williamson

Do you have access to a shared calendar?  No
    If yes, which shared calendar?

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for mass mailings)?  No
    If yes, please list here:

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From: 8:00a     To:      6:00p

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc? No
       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):


I just  changed the demand charge on the Penn Fuel capacity from 6.53 to
6.423 (deal 205687).  I changed the price on the Penn Fuel released demand
from 6.449 to 6.423 (deal 205672).  We were billed 6.423 in January.  That's
an odd rate when everthing else was 6.50.


Looks like I got there attention.  Let's hope it dosen't explode on us.

Please plan on attending with me'
thanks

bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob M Hall/NA/Enron on 04/10/2001 01:14 PM ---------------------------

Janet H Wallis@ECT
04/10/2001 01:12 PM
To:	Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Lofton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael C Bilberry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren Farmer
cc:	Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject:	Bad Debt

Please plan to attend a meeting with Brian Redmond and Bob Hall on Thursday at 4:00 in conference room 3567.
  Each person should be prepared to discuss the current status of each "Bad Debt" account that was assigned to them in February.

If you are unable to attend you will need to schedule a private meeting with Brian Redmond at a later date.

Janet


We have received the following financial Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:		ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:			March 9, 2001

Enron Entity:			Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:			Catequil Partners, L.P.

Transactions Covered:		Approved for all products with the exception of:  Foreign Exchange

Confirming Entity:		Enron North America Corp.

Governing Law:			New York

Special Handling Requirement:	Counterparty has five (5) Local Business Days after a confirmation was effectively received by it to accept or dispute a confirmation.

Copies will be distributed.


I just spoke with another lawyer in our firm that worked at the Robins
Caplin plaintiffs firm where Joe Dunn was before he went to Mark Robinson's
firm.  From an associates perspective, Joe Dunn was never the person to
write the briefs.  He would always have his cross examination scripted by
others.  The bottom line is that Joe Dunn can be very dangerous with the
correct support -- on his own, he is unlikely to figure it out.    Said
differently, Joe Dunn is not a nuts and bolts lawyer.  He is the front
person -- great in front of people and the big picture.  He last was
involved in a case in 1993-94.

I spoke with another partner in our firm whose wife is a former partner of
Joe Dunn's.  Another report that Joe is very long on show and short on hard
work.  The circumstances under which he left the Robin Caplin firm were not
favorable.  Joe is very well connected, having spent most of his time
networking.   There is the possibility that there are some things in Joe's
past that he is not particularly proud of.  He is a politician and anything
that will promote his career, he will use.  Said differently, he talks a
great game but is probably marginal on the legal issues.

Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Bill:  The attached memo was distributed to legal last week.  We have had a
number of questions arise on the power side lately regarding financial
transactions (ranging from short term to quarterly) with governmentals.  As
you will see in the memo, the risks are significant.  Please let me know if
you have any questions.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 04:09 PM -----

	Brenda Whitehead
	09/11/2000 09:16 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M
Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter del
Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart
Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C
Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, James
Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brent
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Martin W
Penkwitz/NA/Enron@Enron, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen E
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Municipalities Memo

per the request of Mark Haedicke/Elizabeth Sager, please see this
attachment:


How about my RRSP contributions for this year?

Chris


Thanks again for thinking of me.  Lunch next week sounds good.  Any day of
the week is fine with me as long as we get started around 11:30.  Just let me
know what day is best for you.

Susan

To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Hook'em

I will let you know when I have extra tickets.  Right now it looks like I
have some tickets for all games except atm.

How about lunch next week?  Let me know.

Scott


no way

just kidding...you get 'em...just tell TJ to put any vacation days you want
to schedule on my calendar.  thanks

fletch


At the request of Jim Derrick, attached is a Memorandum from Mr. Derrick to
all Enron Attorneys outlining the obligations of Enron Corp., Enron Energy
Services, LLC and their respective controlled affiliates under a
Noncompetition Agreement that was recently executed.  Also attached is an
Executive Summary of the Agreement and an electronic version of the Agreement
as executed.  Please also circulate this Memorandum to any attorneys in your
respective business units if they are not on this distribution.

Please note that the Noncompetition Agreement and the transactions underlying
same are highly confidential and have not been publicly announced.
Therefore, please treat same with strict confidence.

The attachments are also being distributed to the Enron Corporate Development
Group and members of the Enron Executive Committee.

Robert