Transwestern Red Rock Expansion

	Shipper	 Binding?	 $Bid/mmbtu	 Term	 Term (months)	 Term (days)	 Receipt	 Delivery	 Volume	 ROFR?	 Gross Value ($)	 NPV ($)	 Notes

1	 PPL	 yes	 $0.35	 30 years, 1 month	 361	 10830	 EOT	 Citizens/Griffith	 8,000 	yes	  $            30,324,000
2	 PPL	 yes	 $0.40	 30 years, 1 month	 361	 10830	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 12,000 	yes	  $            51,984,000
3	 Western	 yes	 $0.38	 15 years	 180	 5400	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 5,000 	yes	  $            10,260,000
4	 Western	 yes	 $0.39	 15 years	 180	 5400	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 5,000 	yes	  $            10,530,000
5	 Dynegy	 no	 $0.55	 5 years	 60	 1800	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 30,000 	no	  $            29,700,000
6	 Aquila	 no	 $0.63	 5 years	 60	 1800	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 50,000 	yes	  $            56,700,000
7	 AEP	 yes	 $0.63	 2 years	 24	 720	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 20,000 	no	  $              9,072,000
8	 AEP	 yes	 $0.63	 1 year	 12	 360	 EOT	 PG&E Topock	 10,000 	no	  $              2,268,000
9	 Oneok	 yes	 $1.75	 22 months	 10	 300	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 50,000 	no	  $            26,250,000
	Oneok	 yes	 $0.75	  	 12	 360	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 50,000 	no	  $            13,500,000
10	 Calpine	 no	 $0.38	 15 years	 180	 5400	 EOT	 PG&E Topock	 40,000 	no	  $            82,080,000
11	 US Gypsum	 yes	 $0.42	 12 years, 3 months	 147	 4410	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 4,500 	yes	  $              8,334,900
12	 Conoco Inc	 yes	 $0.84	 2 years	 24	 720	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 50,000 	no	  $            30,240,000
13	 Conoco Canada	 yes	 $0.84	 2 years	 24	 720	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 50,000 	no	  $            30,240,000
14	 Conoco Lobo	 yes	 $0.84	 2 years	 24	 720	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 50,000 	no	  $            30,240,000
15	 Conoco Lobo Pipeline	 yes	 $0.81	 2 years	 24	 720	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 50,000 	no	  $            29,160,000
16	 Conoco Raptor Energy	 yes	 $0.81	 2 years	 24	 720	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 50,000 	no	  $            29,160,000
17	 Conoco Raptor Pipeline	 yes	 $0.84	 2 years	 24	 720	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 50,000 	no	  $            30,240,000
18	 BP Energy	 yes	 $1.12	 7 months	 7	 210	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 15,000 	no	  $              3,528,000
 	 BP Energy	 yes	 $0.76	 12 months	 12	 360	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 15,000 	no	  $              4,104,000
 	 BP Energy	 yes	 $0.43	 12 months	 12	 360	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 15,000 	no	  $              2,322,000
 	 BP Energy	 yes	 $0.38	 29 months	 29	 870	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 15,000 	no	  $              4,959,000
19	 BP Energy	 yes	 98% Index Spread	 5 years	 60	 1800	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 50,000 	no	  appx $54,000,000
20	 Frito Lay	 yes	 $0.38	 15 years	 180	 5400	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 2,700 	no	  $              5,540,400
21	 Frito Lay	 yes	 $2.20	 1 year	 12	 360	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 3,300 	no	  $              2,613,600
22	 Frito Lay	 yes	 $2.20	 1 year	 12	 360	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 2,000 	no	  $              1,584,000
23	 Newark Group	 yes	 $0.65	 5 years	 60	 1800	 EOT	 SoCal Needles	 800 	no	  $                 936,000
24	 Newark Group	 yes	 $0.15	 5 years	 60	 1800	 EOT	 PG&E Topock	 1,500 	no	  $                 405,000

								704,800 		 appx $590,000,000


Thank you very much.

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	03/20/2001 04:30 PM

		 To: <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: FYI

Will fax the TURN response...have to find Norm's original.

>>> <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com> 03/20/01 02:24PM >>>

Yes.  Dan may we get copy of both Stormin' Norman's initial and TURN's
response.  Thanks alot.

Best,
Jeff

                    Susan J
Mara
                                         To:     Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
                    03/20/2001
cc:
                    03:42 PM             Subject:
FYI

Is this something we care about?

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 01:42 PM -----

"Daniel
                    Douglass"               To:
<Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>,
                    <Douglass@ArterH        <Vicki_Sandler@apses.com>,
<berry@apx.com>,
                    adden.com>              <dcazalet@apx.com>,
<billr@calpine.com>,
                                            <jackp@calpine.com>,
<Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>,
                    03/20/2001 01:37
<gavaughn@duke-energy.com>,
                    PM                      <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>,
<gtbl@dynegy.com>,
                                            <jmpa@dynegy.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>,

<susan_j_mara@enron.com>,

<Tamara_Johnson@enron.com>,
                                            <curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>,
<foothill@lmi.net>,

<camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,

<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>,

<jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>,

<rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>,

<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,

<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>
                                            cc:

                                            Subject:
FYI

On 2/14, the Southern California Generator Coalition filed a petmod asking
that the Commission amend winter balancing rules to allow customers to
bring more gas into the system than the 10% imbalance rules permit and that
customers be allowed to use the previous month's accumulated positive
imbalance in lieu of flowing supplies.

The generator members of WPTF with facilities in southern California may be
interested in knowing that TURN's 3/15 comments recommend instead that the
Commission should rebundle the costs of storage for electric generators in
their transportation rates and requires SoCalGas to store gas on behalf of
those customers.

Let me know if you want to see the TURN comments.

Dan


Alan-

Both Darren and I are available for the conference call Monday at 6:30 p.m.
(Houston time) to discuss financial trading in Japan.  As Jane McBride will
have already started as the permanent lawyer for Enron Japan, I will ask her
to attend, as well.

Cheers,

John

	Darren Delage
	09/13/2000 06:10 PM

		 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Phone Meeting re: Financial Trading in Japan

John,
I am free on tuesday morning

	Alan Aronowitz@ECT
	09/14/2000 04:20 AM

		 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darren Delage/AP/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Phone Meeting re: Financial Trading in Japan

Sara Shackleton and I would like to visit with you and Darren about the
implementation issues going forward on ir/fx trading in Japan. Could you
arrange a meeting with Darren and hook in with Sara and me at
6:30p.m.-7:00p.m. on Monday evening Houston time? If this time does not work,
please suggest another time the early part of next week. Thanks.

Alan


Per his request, we weren't able to video Gary Hamel's presentation at the
Management Conference.  However, he was kind enough though to send along his
PowerPoint presentation -- I understand that he doesn't typically do this.  I
thought you would like to have it for your files.

Take care,
Terrie James
Sr. Director, Corporate Communication
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-7727 (phone)
713-646-8887 (fax)
terrie_james@enron.net
----- Forwarded by Terrie James/Enron Communications on 12/06/00 05:09 AM
-----

	greim@strategos.com
	12/05/00 01:43 PM

		 To: Terrie James/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Gary Hamel's slide set

Hello Terrie,

I understand you were hoping to get a copy of Gary Hamel's Powerpoint slide
presentation.  It is attached.

Our apologies that it took so long!

Best to you,
Grace
650.851.2095


whaddya mean?  you mean software?


The following are my comments:

  - I assume that Settlements is fine with invoicing no later than the 7 th
of each mth.
  - Section M:  Should we go this route (covenant of financial support) or
would we be accomplishing the same if we structure this as MDEA, agent for
..., similar to that in the Interconnection Agmt.  We should probably look
into it further for the longer term deal.  I don't know which has the
stronger fall back to the municipalities.

Ed Sacks

Have a good rest of the weekend.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Rorschach, Reagan
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 4:40 PM
To: Marvin Carraway (E-mail); Marvin Carraway (E-mail 2); Robert Priest
(E-mail); David Fairley (E-mail); David Fairley (E-mail 2); David Fairley
(E-mail 3); Bentley, Corry; Comeaux, Keith; Coulter, Kayne; Cross, Edith;
Fairley, David; Herndon, Rogers; Homco, Jim; Kumar, Madhup; Mann, Kay; May,
Tom; Miller, Jeffrey; Morse, Brad; Nicolay, Christi; Pagan, Ozzie; Podurgiel,
Laura; Reeves, Leslie; Sacks, Edward; Serio, Erik; White, Stacey; Will, Lloyd
Subject: FW: long form confirm/MDEA

Please send comments to Kay this weekend at both address below.

kay.mann@enron.com, kay.mann@worldnet.att.net

Thanks,

Reagan

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 4:33 PM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Subject: RE: long form confirm/MDEA

Here's where I am on the ILA.  I think it should be distributed internally
and to the Cities ASAP,  with an explanation that we are still pondering it.

Kay

 << File: MDEA ILA (Mann 4-27 draft).doc >>

Kay


harumph

	Ted Bockius <Ted.Bockius@ivita.com>
	11/29/2000 05:09 PM

		 To: "'Mark.Taylor@enron.com'" <Mark.Taylor@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Monaco

You are so photogenic and I'm not :( unhappyness.  But your photos look
great.  Perhaps it's the skill of the photographer...wait, I didn't mean
that...please keep sending photos.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Taylor@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Taylor@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 4:52 PM
To: ted.bockius@ivita.com
Subject: Monaco

(See attached file: MT Monaco 1.jpg)


I thought this was to go to Dina. Sorry
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 12:22 PM -----

	Brenda Whitehead
	10/24/2000 11:05 AM

		 To: Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Monthly Report

Attached are Elizabeth's comments:


I think I hate football too.  4th and goal on the 3 yard line, to win the
game, and RC decides to change his lifelong coaching strategy from run, run,
run, to pass the ball.  Why not Ja'mar??  The guy who carried 3 defenders
into the end zone earlier.  Anyway, we beat the spread and I got $20 from
your friend Mary.  So things are not all bad.

How did the Corn boys lose?  If I would have known about it on Saturday, I
would have called to console you and the family.  Maybe it's time to just
turn our attention to the NBA and leave this heartache behind.

D

"buylow" <buylow@houston.rr.com> on 11/12/2000 01:54:00 AM
To: "Daren Farmer" <daren.j.farmer@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Football

Ugh -- I hate football. It looks like I will have to do  something different
on New Years Day.
?
What happened to you guys? You had them by the  clankers.
?
Later,
Ken


Richard -

Attached is an outline of the involvement we've engaged AA to perform for
each business unit as they go-live onto SAP.  Please remember that ENA is
going live onto SAP's "common design" that has already been reviewed by AA
from a internal controls perspective.  So this attachment outlines those
items outside of "common design" that Wanda and Sally  probably want covered
from an ENA perspective.  As a rule of thumb, this proposed scope equates to
$100k - $150k in fees to AA that is over & above the audit budget.

One word of advice:  Designate a lead within ENA that has the time to stay on
top of the project, schedule meetings with AA, and coordinate their
involvement with the SAP team members, e.g. not Wanda or Sally, but at a
director/manager level at least.  I was the designee for Corp and ensured
that AA kept the project going.  Also, I worked extensively with the Janet
Tran, SAP lead director responsible for bringing Corp up.  Some big benefits:
Kept AA out of SAP's hair when things got rough.
Made sure that the SAP team knew what our goals & objectives were, especially
when we found something that needed fixed before go-live.
Managed that in fact AA provided us a deliverable at the end of the project.

Please review and call if you need other info.  I'd be glad to assist ENA
too.  I assisted Europe (Naomi Connell) and Int'l cos (John Berggren).  They
appreciated having a "co-pilot" and we avoided duplication of effort with
what had already been done for the prior go-lives.  Also, they felt that
value was rec'd for dollars paid to AA for this work.

Terrie


UPDATE 1-EnronOnline energy e-trade resumes after halt.

08/09/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

NEW YORK, Aug 9 (Reuters) - EnronOnline, the Internet arm of energy marketing
and trading giant Enron Corp. , said Thursday that trade in its online energy
products was resuming after a brief halt at about 10 a.m. EDT (1400 GMT).

"Most people should be able to log on now. We've been slowly bringing it
back," a company spokesman told Reuters.
He said the cause of the outage was still not known.

With an average of $3.5 billion in trades every day, EnronOnline enjoys the
highest volume of all energy electronic platforms.

The company posts bids and offers for a variety of energy products, including
crude oil, heating oil, gasoline, natural gas and electricity.

Enron Corp. is the No. 1 natural gas and electricity marketer in the United
States, and about 60 percent of its transactions are captured through the
electronic platform.

Folder Name: Enron Reuters folder
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 97

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


keepin it real in 2-0-0-1


The index products look great.  Can you have the same constraint language
included on the PG&E Topock location for creating the phys forward (fixed
price) product?  Let me know when that is done.

Thank you.

Mike


This is the latest confirm letter.


email


Would you review this?  Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 08:40 AM
---------------------------

Linda L Lawrence@ENRON
10/25/2000 07:49 AM
Sent by: Linda L Lawrence@ENRON
To: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Monica
Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Valarie Sabo/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: WSPP report for 3rd quarter

Attached  is EPMI's 3rd quarter WSPP report for your review and comments,
Wright & Talisman request that
we submit our filing electronically  by Friday, October 27.

Thanks
Linda

----- Forwarded by Linda L Lawrence/NA/Enron on 10/25/2000 09:18 AM -----

	Valarie Sabo@ECT
	07/31/2000 11:14 AM

		 To: Linda L Lawrence/HOU/EES@EES, Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cara
Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Monica Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin
Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: WSPP report for 3rd quarter

Hi Folks!  For 3rd quarter we'll need to undergo an examination of our
reporting requirements for WSPP and accordingly, our reporting processes.
The filing requirements can be found under the " WSPP Library" heading of the
Current Documents section of the WSPP home page (www.wspp.org).

Basically, we just need to be confident our reports are accurate and we also
need to be cognizant that if we make significant changes, we should be able
to anticipate the impact of those changes and send appropriate adjusting
notification if necessary.  Let's not surprise ourselves or FERC in a big way!

I'm not sure that I am the appropriate staff to head this up, but will be
happy to provide organization and coordination to the effort until we all are
happy with the undertaking.

Next week after the close of this month is complete, I will structure a
project management file on the WSPP reporting and we'll take it from there.
Please contact me with comments, questions, complaints, x7756.

P.S.
We have filed the 2nd quarter report using the unchanged method.


Please join me and the Global Accounting leadership team in congratulating
the following individuals on their promotions to:

To Managing Director
 Sally Beck (EWN)
 Fernley Dyson (EEL)

To Vice President
 Beth Apollo (ENW)
 Janine Juggins (EEL Tax)
 Phillip Lord (EBS)
 Laura Scott (ENA)
 Chris Sherman (ENA)
 Wade Stubblefield (EES)

To Senior Director
 Buddy Aiken (EEL)
 Jim Coffey (ENA)
 Donette Dewar (Intl. Tax)
 Patricia Dunn (NEPCO)
 Mark Frank (ENA)
 William Gehle (EECC)
 Joseph Grajewski (EECC)
 Jan Johnson (Corp)
 Scott Mills (ENW)
 James New (EEL)
 Mary L. Ruffer (ENA)
 Richard Sage (EEL)
 Elaine Schield (Corp)
 Kevin Sweeney (ENW)
 Beth Wapner (EBS Tax)

Director
 Thresa Allen (ENW)
 Ron Baker (Corp)
 Misty Barrett (EES)
 Jeff Blumenthal (EWS)
 Trey Cash (Corp Tax)
 Karen Choyce (Corp)
 Cheryl Dawes (ENA)
 Lanette Earnest (EWS Tax)
 Jeffrey Gossett (ENW)
 Robert Guthrie (ETS Tax)
 Susan Helton (ENA)
 Ralph Jaeger (EEL)
 Andrea Kerch (EEL)
 Faith Killen (ENA)
 Johnna Kokenge (Corp)
 Matt Landy (EEL)
 Andy Lawrence (ISC)
 Connie Lee (EBS)
 Caroline Lothian (EEL)
 Meg Malone (Corp Tax)
 Gary Peng (Corp)
 Stephen Schwarzbach (Corp)
 Sally Seelig (EES Tax)
 Don Shackley (EES/London Tax)
 Patricia Shannon (Corp)
 Eddie Sikes (Intl. Tax)
 Jeffrey Smith ( EGM)
 Ron Smith (GSS)
 Kim Theriot (ENW)
 Hope Vargas (ENA)
 Tina Ward (EEL)
 Stephen Whitaker (EEL)
 Stacey White (ENW)
 Rob Wilcott (Corp)

To Manager
 Christopher Abel (ENW)
 Stacey Aune (ENA)
 David Baumbach (ENW)
 Maya Beyhum (ENW London)
 Patricia Bloom (ENA)
 Matthew Brown (ENW)
 Vince Cacaro (ISC)
 Clara Carrington (ENW)
 Carol Carter (ENA)
 Carolyn Centilli (ISC)
 Erin Copeland (EECC)
 Richard Cross (ENW)
 Rachel Davis (Corp)
 Michael Desbiens (ISC)
 David Dupre (ISC)
 Eileen Flanagan (EEL)
 Regina Figueroa (ISC)
 Rebecca Ford (ENW)
 Darron Giron (ENW)
 Julie Goodfriend (International Tax)
 Karen Gruesen (ENA)
 Kevin Hall (EEL)
 Kristen Hanson (ENW)
 David Horne (ISC)
 Larry Hunter (ENW)
 Todd Hunter (EES)
 Jim Ischy (GSS)
 Chris Jones (ISC)
 William Kasmervisz (ENW)
 Kam Kaiser (ENW)
 Kedar Kulkarni (ISC)
 Monica Lande (ENW Portland)
 Suzanne Lane (EEL)
 Vince Mack (ISC)
 David Maxwell (ENW)
 Emitra Nelson (ISC
 Caroline Nugent (EWS Tax)
 Mark Pope (ISC)
 Yiannis Poulopoulos (London Tax)
 Melissa Ratnala (ENW)
 Jason Sharp (Corp Tax)
 Stephanie Smith (Corp)
 Patricia Spence (ENW)
 Amy Spode (ENW)
 Patricia Sullivan (ENW)
 Lisa Sutton (ETS)
 John Swinney (ENW)
 Deana Taylor (Corp)
 Dimitri Taylor (ENW)
 Wayne Tencer (EES)
 Bernella Tholen (ENA)
 Theresa Vos (ENA)
 Blake Walker (EECC)
 Bob Ward (International Tax)
 David Williams (EEL)

To Senior Specialist
 Amelia Alland (ENW)
 James Armstrong (ENA)
 Carmen Ayala (GSS
 Cynthia Balfour-Flanagan (ENW)
 Gilda Bartz (Corp)
 Stacey Brewer (ENW)
 Marian Briscoe (Corp Tax)
 Aneela Charania (ENW)
 Patricia Clark (Corp)
 Chris Crixell (EES Tax)
 Diane Ellstrom (ENW)
 Heidi Griffith (EES)
 Marla Hernandez (ISC)
 Marlene Hilliard (ENW)
 Dave Hollick (London Tax)
 Rachel Jones (EEL)
 Dawn Kenne (ENW)
 Harry Kent (EWS Tax)
 Blanca Lopez (ENA)
 Brian Hunter Lindsay (EEL)
 Rachel Lyon (EEL)
 Stacy Hardy (ENA)
 Sally McAdams (ISC)
 Kelly McCain (Corp Tax)
 Errol McLaughlin, Jr. (ENW)
 Sylvia Martinez (ISC)
 Kevin Meredith (ENW)
 Meredith Mitchell (ENW)
 Winnie Ngai (Corp Tax)
 Thien-Huong Ngo (ENW)
 Brian Palmer (ENW)
 Bich Ann T Pham (ENA)
 Shelly Pierson (Corp)
 Lillie Pittman (ISC)
 David Rae (ENW)
 Dixie Riddle (ETS Tax)
 Salvador Dominguez (Corp)
 Mark Schrab (ENW)
 Stephanie Sever (ENW)
 Danielle Shafer (ISC)
 Shifali Sharma (ENW)
 Keith Simper (ENA)
 Christopher Spears (ENW)
 Caron Stark (ISC)
 Tara Sweitzer (ENW)
 David Vandor (ENA)
 Mary Womack (ISC)
 David Yang (International Tax)
 Sabrae Zajac (ENW)

To Specialist
 Kim Chick (EES Tax)
 Justin East (EEL)
 Joey Esperance (International Tax)
 Randi Howard (ISC)
 Melanie Hutchinson (EWS Tax)
 Mary Joseph (Corp Tax)
 Sherri Kathol (International Tax)
 Lex Lacaze (International Tax)
 Michelle LeBlanc (Corp Tax)
 Ling Li (EWS Tax)
 Kori Loibl (ENW)
 Alan Marsh (Corp Tax)
 Bruce Mills (ENW)
 Erika Moore (EEL)
 Matthew Motsinger (ENW)
 Sherry Meyers (ISC)
 Andrea Price (Corp Tax)
 Bernice Rodriguez (ENW)
 Tina Salinas (EES Tax)
 Brent Vasconcellos (Corp Tax)
 Brandi Wachtendorf (ENW)
 Patryk Wlodarski      (ENW London)

To Entry Specialist
 Stuart Sheldrick (EEL)

To Accountant I
 Becky Klussman (Corp)

To Accountant II
 Silvia Shelby (Accounts Payable)

To Staff
 Mary Behn (EES)
 Guy Freshwater (ENW London)
 Geralynn Gosnell (ENW)
 Richard Miley (ENW)
 Brent Storey (ENW London)
 Stuart Thom (ENW London)
 Judith Walters (ENW)
 Jonathan White (ENW London)
 Joan Winfrey (ENW)

To Senior Tax Analyst
 Emily Allwardt (International Tax)
 Leon Branom (EBS Tax)
 Shanna Husser (EES Tax)
 Shilpa Mane (Corporate/London Tax)
 Todd Richards (Corp Tax)
 Michelle Thompson (Corp Tax)

To Sr. Administrative Assistant
 Norma Chavez (International Tax)
 Sarah Knott (ENW London)

To Sr. Travel Administrator
 Cheryl Slone (GSS )

To Administrative Coordinator
 Heather Choate (ENW)
 Kayla Heitmeyer (GSS)

To Senior Clerk
 Angela Barnett (ENW)
 Matthew Davies (ENW London)
 Daniela De Lisi (ENW London)
 Rufino Dorteo (ENA)
 Mark Pilkington (ENW London)
 Narjinder Sandhu (EEL)
 Howard Sweasey (EEL)
 Laura Vargas (ENW)
 Jo Ann Woods (Corp Tax)

To Intermediate Clerk
 Maria Maldonado (Accounts Payable)
 Araceli Mondragon (Accounts Payable)
 Irma Rodriguez (Accounts Payable)
 Bernita Sowell (Accounts Payable)


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


This problem is a result of the lack an automated interface between GCP and RPS and RGS.  My understanding is that Todd Taylor on your team is working on this interface.  What is the expected completion of this interface, and if is later than today, what can be done to deliver this ASAP.  With the large number of Mass Market deals being done, it is imperative to have an automated solution to this problem.  Can you call me today with an update?  Thanks. -Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beck, Sally
Sent:	Tuesday, November  13, 2001 9:02 AM
To:	Apollo, Beth; Scribner, James
Subject:	Need Answers Today

Can you update me today on status, issues and resolution?  We need to get back with Bill Bradford today.  --Sally
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bradford, William S.
Sent:	Monday, November  12, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Vasan, Sue; Harris, Molly; Slaughter, Chris; Mihalik, Teresa; Holzer, Erich; Power, Keith E.; Furey, Denise; Brackett, Debbie R.
Cc:	Mills, Scott; Beck, Sally; Stubbs, Shelly
Subject:	RE: EES Weekly Status

This is totally unacceptable.  Is there any focus on cleaning this up?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vasan, Sue
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 3:31 PM
To:	Harris, Molly; Slaughter, Chris; Mihalik, Teresa; Holzer, Erich; Power, Keith E.; Furey, Denise; Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.
Subject:	EES Weekly Status

Big jump in the number of New Counterparties.  Up by 5,420 new counterparties.

 << File: EES Cpty Stats.xls >>


Teco Tap       150.000 / HPL Gas Daily


Daren,
Thanks--while I'm certain I should know, I must confess that i do not know
what CPI stands for???

Sandi

	Daren J Farmer
	10/16/2000 11:39 AM

		 To: Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Rate for Tenaska Deal

Sandi,

Sorry for just now getting back with you.  I was out last week.

The rate ($.04/mmbtu) will be charged on the greater of the volumes nominated
on the supply contracts or the actual deliveries to the plant.  The fee will
be adjusted yearly based on CPI.

Bob - I could not remember if we stated the type of settlement on the
delivered volumes (actuals or nominations).  I think we should use actuals
due to possibility that the plant could over pull with out our knowledge on a
daily basis.  We would receive the estimates/actuals on a lag and may have to
purchase gas to offset the imbalance, even though the plant kept the noms at
the 45,000 base.  I also think that if the plant does increase the nom, they
are more likely to pull the additional volume rather than pulling less.  Do
you agree with this?

D

From: Sandi M Braband on 10/10/2000 03:41 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rate for  Tenaska Deal

Daren,
When we met regarding the rate for the Tenaska Gas Management Agreement, you
guys mentioned that it would be tied to an index--could you restate for me
how that is to work--it will start out 4 cents per MMBTU based on the greater
of the volumes nominated through the supply contracts or the actual
deliveries to the plant. Then the fee will vary month to month? year to year?
based on what index?

Thanks,
Sandi


UPDATE

Cancellation of System Outage Notification

Outage Description:

We had previously communicated that all SAP systems (including Financial Production, HR Production, Interfaces , iBuyIt, and iPayIt) would be shutdown over the weekend in order to upgrade our storage hardware. We are temporarily postponing these activities and will send you additional communications to inform you of the new date(s) in the near future.

Date & Time of Outage:

The scheduled System Outage has been postponed

Contacts:

Contact:

Contact Information:

ISC Customer Care

713-345-4727


Interesting read from Fortune Magazine.  A little dated though.

Copyright 1999 Time Inc.
                   Fortune

                   December 20, 1999

                   SECTION: FEATURES/TEXAS LONGHORNS; Pg. 160

                   LENGTH: 4639 words

                   HEADLINE: How One College Program Runs The Business;
                   INSIDE LONGHORN INC.

                   BYLINE: Roy S. Johnson, Research Associate Mary Danehy

                   BODY:

                   Tom Hicks was beside himself. He couldn't sit in one
place. And
                   he couldn't stand. He couldn't even bear to watch at
times, but
                   the buoyant CEO and chairman of Hicks Muse Tate & Furst,
the
                   giant buyout firm, also couldn't afford to turn away,
because
                   this deal could go either way. I'm not talking about the
                   company's pending $ 200 million bet on an Internet outfit
called
                   Teligent. That's pocket change to a business managing more
than
                   $ 11 billion in assets. This was really big. This was
Saturday
                   afternoons in the fall. This was perky cheerleaders flying
                   through the air, and high-stepping marching bands. This
was
                   college football. This was Texas.

                   On this autumn Saturday afternoon in Austin, the
University of
                   Texas Longhorns led powerful Nebraska with only a few
minutes on
                   the clock at Darrell K Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium, the
team's
                   newly renovated home. A win would be huge. The
Cornhuskers,
                   perennial national title contenders, were big-bully
conference
                   rivals and ranked third in the nation, while the young
Longhorns
                   were like clumsy calves still finding their legs under
                   second-year coach Mack Brown. Hicks is a proud and
generous alum
                   (Texas Exes, they're called), and he's deep into this Hook
'em
                   Horns thing. Two years ago he flew athletic director
DeLoss
                   Dodds to North Carolina on his private plane to woo Brown
to
                   Austin personally, and he regularly counsels the coach on
                   management matters. He also advised Dodds about pricing,
                   financing, and amenities when Texas built 66 posh private
suites
                   at the stadium before last season. In October he hosted a
                   charity golf tournament in Dallas during the raucous
                   Texas-Oklahoma weekend to benefit the school's sports
programs.
                   He owns the Texas Rangers baseball team and the NHL Dallas
                   Stars, but Tom Hicks loves the Texas Longhorns.

                   So it's understandable that he was a bit on edge at the
Nebraska
                   game, hosting a couple of dozen friends, relatives, and
business
                   associates in one of the glitzy new suites high above the
field
                   at the Nebraska game. Wearing a Longhorn burnt-orange
shirt and
                   surrounded by enough ice-cream bars and shrimp to satisfy
an
                   offensive line, Hicks was anxious and animated. "Hey," he
yelled,
                   "ain't this something?"

                   It sure is. The University of Texas athletic program is at
a
                   pretty intriguing place in college sports. With a surging
young
                   football team at its core, it is one of the most
successful
                   college athletic programs in the country, and I'm not just
                   talking about wins and losses. This is a
multimillion-dollar
                   enterprise that operates more like a solid business than a
                   renegade campus outfit. College sports has been a
big-ticket
                   dance for some time now, and this program is much like
others at
                   the top-tier universities, but there are a couple of
exceptions:
                   The folks making the moves in Austin function more like
CEOs than
                   like traditional athletic directors and coaches, and
they're
                   making it work.

                   To determine how they do it, I went back to school this
fall and
                   asked to take a close look at the books. What I found was
an
                   operation that balances the athletic department's
educational
                   responsibilities with fiscal discipline at a time when the
costs
                   of running a big-time athletic program are surging and
most
                   college athletic programs are in the red. I found a place
where
                   football pays the bills. That was no surprise, but this
was:
                   Among the beneficiaries of big-time football is a women's
sports
                   program that could be a model for gender equity.

                   In fact, at the University of Texas, the football
Longhorns are
                   Grade A cash cows. Athletics officials credit the team
with
                   generating a staggering 80% of the department's $ 45.3
million
                   from revenues in 1999. That's $ 36 million from tickets,
                   individual donations, rights fees, sponsorships, hot dogs,
beer,
                   and other sources.

                   The athletic department operates much like a
self-contained
                   corporation, separate and apart from the rest of the
university.
                   It has its core business (football); various auxiliary
operations
                   (other men's and women's teams); numerous revenue streams;
                   traditional corporate functions such as finance,
marketing,
                   public relations, and HR (you know it as recruiting); and
even
                   sophisticated satellite offices--dozens of alumni chapters
                   nationwide, through which athletics targets some 400,000
Texas
                   Exes for private gifts. Got shareholders? You bet. More
than
                   80,000 of them meet in the stadium in Austin on Saturdays
in the
                   fall, and they grade every move Mack Brown makes. Think
chasing
                   quarterly expectations is brutal? Try putting the success
of your
                   company in the hands of a bunch of 18- to 22-year-olds.
Hate
                   talking to analysts? Try answering Buck from Muleshoe,
Texas, on
                   a weekly call-in talk show after losing a 23-point lead in
the
                   fourth quarter.

                   Of course, the whole thing is complicated by the fact that
while
                   a major-college athletic program must be managed with the
                   diligence of a public company, athletic directors don't
have the
                   luxury of shutting down unprofitable businesses--at most
schools
                   that would be every sport save football and men's
basketball. And
                   those well-paid football coaches, quite simply, must win.
"If we
                   were a business, we wouldn't have any sport but football,
and we
                   would generate a heck of a profit," says Dodds, who is
among the
                   nation's most respected athletic directors. "But we're not
about
                   that. We take the money we generate from football and use
it to
                   provide opportunities for other kids. Then we try to
balance what
                   we want to accomplish inside the institution with what
folks
                   outside the institution want us to do. It's a hard thing
to do."

                   For more than a quarter-century, one of the most difficult
                   challenges for college sports has been finding a place for
women.
                   You've probably heard of Title IX, the historic clause in
the
                   Education Amendments Act of 1972 that turned college
sports on
                   its ear by requiring athletic programs to offer equality
for
                   women in participation, scholarship allocation,
recruitment
                   spending, and coaching resources. The requirement forced
athletic
                   departments to essentially double their operations, which
helped
                   spark the overall growth in college sports. So whatever
you think
                   about the emphasis on college football, hey, it pays for
women's
                   soccer, okay?

                   The Texas athletic department's budget is among the
largest in
                   the nation--$ 41.2 million for fiscal 1999, which ended in
                   August. Only four universities had fatter sports wallets
that
                   year: Wisconsin ($ 41.4 million), Tennessee ($ 45
million),
                   Michigan ($ 47.6 million), and Ohio State, No. 1 by far
with a
                   whopping $ 64.9 million athletics budget. (If you think
those who
                   spend the most win, forget it: OSU is the only school of
the
                   group not ranked in the latest Top 25 AP football poll.)

                   How does UT get to its number? For starters, ticket sales
and
                   game guarantees (payments to UT by a host school when the
                   Longhorns play on the road) generated $ 10.1 million in
revenue
                   last year. That category was exceeded only by private
gifts,
                   which totaled an impressive $ 21 million. Other
significant
                   income categories included suite-lease revenue ($ 3.2
million),
                   television money ($ 3.9 million), payment for the team's
Cotton
                   Bowl appearance ($ 866,842), optional student fees ($
570,000),
                   sponsorships and advertising ($ 400,000), licensing
revenue
                   ($ 300,000), and concessions ($ 750,000). All told, the
department
                   generated $ 45.4 million in 1999.

                   The athletic department's expenses totaled $ 50.1 million.
That
                   included scholarships valued at $ 2.8 million for 226 men
and 186
                   women, administrative costs ($ 1.4 million) for about 230
                   employees, and equipment purchases ($ 2.4 million). The
costs of
                   running individual teams ranged from $ 7.5 million for
football to
                   $ 370,000 for tennis.

                   What caused the shortfall? The final bills for a two-year,
$ 93
                   million capital improvement effort. Remarkably, the
athletic
                   department completed the project without a penny from the
                   university's academic funds. It raised more than $ 31
million in
                   private donations in just over two years. The department
also
                   took out $ 48 million in bonds (serviced now by lease and
ticket
                   revenues). The bill was closed with $ 14 million from the
                   university's Parking and Traffic division to fund a
parking
                   garage. So what can you get for $ 93 million? Take a
stroll down
                   East Campus Drive near the stadium, and you'll pass the
spiffy
                   new $ 28 million Mike A. Myers Stadium and Soccer Field.
One block
                   over is maybe the nicest football practice facility in the
                   country, the newly renovated Denius Athletic Fields ($ 2.5
                   million). It was subsidized by 82-year-old World War II
veteran
                   Frank A. Denius, a longtime fan who has attended practices
most
                   every day for as long as anyone can remember.

                   Beyond the 66 suites at Royal-Memorial stadium, UT added
nearly
                   7,000 new seats, renovated major sections on both sides of
the
                   76-year-old facility, and lowered the field three feet.
Why lower
                   the field, you ask? I did too. Better sightlines, of
course. The
                   stadium renovations cost $ 55 million--$ 3.2 million to
lower the
                   field alone! The department also spruced up its main
offices, now
                   known as the Moncrief-Neuhaus Complex. (If you've got an
extra
                   million, you can get your name slapped on just about
anything.)
                   The place is Four Seasons plush. There's an impressive
academic
                   support center stocked with computers, a hangar-sized
weight room
                   that could inspire a couch potato, and an over-the-top
football
                   locker room any NFL team would envy--custom-carved
benches,
                   original art, and lockers the size of small Manhattan
apartments.
                   Mack Brown's spacious office, with a picture window
overlooking
                   the stadium field, is trimmed in warm cherrywood and
decorated
                   with mementos and collectibles, including a case of
watches
                   commemorating universities and bowl games where he has
coached
                   during his 24-year career. Photos from the Longhorn
archives line
                   the hallways, and display cases in the lobby house the
school's
                   three national championship trophies (1963, '69, and '70)
and the
                   1977 Heisman Trophy, won by the man who is still the most
                   powerful and exciting running back in college football
history,
                   former Longhorn Earl Campbell. Check out the intricate,
                   hand-carved leather saddles in the cavernous players'
lounge.
                   Yep, you can sit on the saddles and watch games.

                   If it all seems impossibly lavish, there are reasons. The
stadium
                   upgrade generates new revenue, and the school had to build
new
                   facilities for its women's programs under requirements
outlined
                   in Title IX. But perhaps the most vital reason is
recruiting. "We
                   had to stay sexy and attractive to the kids," says Ed
Goble, UT's
                   vice president of business affairs. "You've got to provide
an
                   enhanced experience on campus to compete for the best
kids."

                   CEO and COO would be more appropriate titles for Dodds and
Brown,
                   the UT athletic director and head football coach. Dodds, a
                   62-year-old former track coach, got into sports
administration
                   because he liked working with coaches. Today he has an
associate
                   athletic director who handles those duties. Dodds is too
busy
                   closing new sponsorship deals, negotiating Big 12
Conference
                   television and radio contracts, glad-handing with
boosters,
                   serving on NCAA committees, and promoting his
self-described
                   "passion"--a college football championship tournament.
Dodds
                   believes critics of a post-season tournament for college
                   football--the only major sport without a legitimate
championship
                   tournament--are, after years of debate, softening. If it
were to
                   happen, it would have to be approved within the next 18
months,
                   says Dodds, a "window" before negotiations for the next
round of
                   network television contracts kick into gear. Dodds thinks
a
                   college football championship would generate about $ 2
million for
                   each of the 120 or so schools playing Division I-A
football. "I
                   think that over a seven-year period a football playoff is
worth
                   several billion," he says.

                   In the grand scheme of the college sports industry, $ 2
million
                   may not seem like much, but Dodds knows well that success
comes
                   with a price. After last season, when Brown took the
Longhorns to
                   a post-season bowl for the first time since 1990, Dodds
ripped up
                   the coach's original contract and signed him to a new
ten-year
                   deal worth $ 1 million annually. He added an annuity,
largely
                   funded by private donors, that will give Brown $ 1 million
                   annually at age 60 should he remain another four years.

                   By the way, Brown does earn more than the university
president,
                   Dr. Larry R. Faulkner, whose salary is $ 319,400. So does
                   basketball coach Rick Barnes, who earns $ 750,000. But if
you're
                   looking for the sort of acrimony between sports and
academics
                   that tears so many schools apart, you won't find much of
it here.
                   "I have a lot of respect for Dodds, his inventiveness, and
his
                   way of keeping the organization attuned to opportunities,"
says
                   Faulkner. "I've certainly paid attention to that."

                   The football coach actually gets to "coach" about as much
as Bill
                   Gates gets to play videogames these days. His nine
assistants
                   structure and manage practices and deal with most routine
player
                   matters. Brown, like any top-level executive, is expected
to be
                   the company's outside guy. He's your COO with a whistle.
Most of
                   his hours are filled with media obligations (about two
dozen
                   television and radio stations and newspapers cover the
                   Longhorns), fundraising (for the entire university as well
as the
                   athletic department), and trying to keep his own
management team
                   in place. (After last season, seven of his assistant
coaches were
                   offered head coaching jobs elsewhere; Brown kept them all,
adding
                   $ 250,000 to the department's payroll. Additionally, five
coaches
                   were granted annuities worth $ 50,000 to $ 60,000 at age
60 if they
                   hang on with Brown for four more years.)

                   On occasion, Brown also telephones one of the many
corporate
                   executives who are big UT boosters, guys like Hicks and
San
                   Antonio car dealer Red McCombs, another alum and the owner
of the
                   NFL's Minnesota Vikings. Brown looks to Hicks for
time-management
                   advice and insights on coping with pressure. With McCombs
he
                   talks talent and tries to absorb some of the owner's
upbeat
                   attitude. ("Hey, you're talking to one of only two owners
who're
                   going to the Super Bowl," McCombs told Brown after an
                   early-season Longhorn loss. At the time, the Vikings were
1-2).
                   "One of the things that's common in both of them is that
they're
                   high energy," says Brown. "They have the ability to dream,
they
                   have a lot of imagination, and they don't get down very
much." In
                   some areas, though, Brown is on his own. "The difference
between
                   their business and ours is that they can hire and fire who
they
                   want to," the coach said one October afternoon while
lounging on
                   one of the plush leather couches in his office. "In my
business,
                   we put our paychecks in the mouths of 18- to 22-year-olds
we
                   can't fire. It's like that ugly-baby theory--we can't get
rid of
                   them. So we have to hug them and teach them better.
Another
                   thing--CEOs don't have to deal with mothers. The major
difference
                   for us is the kids."

                   Brown's kids were whooping it up with 80,000-plus Longhorn
                   faithful on that October afternoon when the pop of the
final gun
                   signaled the end of the Nebraska game. Final score: Texas
24,
                   Nebraska 20. The victory was a turning point for the young
                   Longhorns that propelled them to their finest season in
years.
                   Going into their last regular-season game against Texas
A&M, the
                   Longhorns have their best record (9-2) since winning ten
games in
                   1995--albeit one that ended in an atmosphere of tragedy. A
week
                   before the game 12 students were killed and 28 injured on
the A&M
                   campus while building a huge bonfire structure for a
pregame
                   rally. As FORTUNE went to press the game was scheduled to
be
                   played.

                   This year the Longhorns have been ranked as high as sixth
in the
                   AP Top 25, their highest perch since 1996. Their reward? A
                   possible trip to the Tostitos Fiesta Bowl in January, a
                   prestigious bowl game despite its name. Each team in the
game
                   receives $ 1.5 million. To put it another way, the
Nebraska
                   victory paid off for the Longhorns like an Internet IPO.
So
                   while Dodds appeared calm amid the post-game celebrations,
he
                   was actually more relieved than anything. "If you don't
win,
                   you're not doing your job," he said. "And you don't
survive."

                   There have been times of real doubt in recent years at UT
                   athletics as the program struggled to find its way back to
                   football prominence in the '90s. But perhaps the most
                   significant crisis occurred in 1992, when seven female
athletes
                   filed a lawsuit against the university charging that it
had
                   failed to comply with Title IX. When the suit was filed,
about
                   37% of UT's varsity athletes were women, and female
athletes
                   received about $ 1 million in scholarships, well short of
the
                   $ 2.8 million awarded to male varsity athletes. Some
executives
                   inside the department wanted to fight the charges. Recalls
Jody
                   Conradt, UT's women's athletic director and head coach of
                   women's basketball: "Some folks said, 'Let's have a final
war
                   right here on the University of Texas campus, and let's
just see
                   who's right!' Thankfully, DeLoss and others said, 'That's
not
                   the way. We need to sit down and come up with a solution.
" Just
                   three days after negotiations began, the university
settled,
                   essentially agreeing to all demands. Today, 43% of the
                   department's scholarship dollars are spent for female
athletes,
                   who represent 43.7% of UT's athletes.

                   Dodds believes that if the esteemed founders of college
sports
                   had not spurned female athletes from the start, then the
industry
                   would not have endured the turmoil that ruling ignited.
                   "Somebody, somewhere, made a big mistake," he says.
"Somebody,
                   somewhere, decided women didn't need to be in sports, and
I don't
                   know why we weren't smart enough to fix it sooner."

                   The person most credited with nudging--some say
shoving--Texas in
                   the right direction on gender equity is Donna Lopiano, a
longtime
                   activist for equity for women in sports and now head of
the
                   Women's Sports Foundation. She became women's athletic
director
                   at the University of Texas in 1975, the first woman in the
                   country to hold an AD title at a major university. Like
many
                   advocates for gender equity, she felt the university was
dragging
                   toward Title IX compliance, but as a university official
she
                   could not openly encourage students to challenge the
university.
                   Instead she handed out Title IX manuals and complaint
forms from
                   boxes she stashed behind her desk like candy at Halloween.
"Must
                   have done it hundreds of times, for 17 years," she says,
laughing
                   at the memory. "I had boxes of manuals and more boxes to
replace
                   them. I couldn't believe it when somebody finally did it."
By
                   "it," she means filed suit.

                   "It took someone to be abrasive, pushy, and all the other
                   adjectives her friends use for Donna," says Conradt.
"Donna
                   scares people. It wouldn't have happened any other way. No
                   question, she's the most significant individual for what
we've
                   been able to achieve in women's athletics."

                   Today women's athletics at UT has its own corporate
structure
                   and hierarchy. It shares resources with the men in many
areas,
                   but it has its own management team, led by Conradt, who,
like
                   Dodds, reports to university vice president Pat Ohlendorf.
Only
                   a handful of Division I programs are similarly structured.
"I
                   think young women need to see women as bosses," Conradt
says.
                   "If the [men's and women's] departments merged, how would
women
                   get the chance to run any of the areas? This way we have
role
                   models for student athletes."

                   The women still have a long way to go before reaching
parity in
                   one critical area--fundraising. Last year gifts received
by
                   women's sports totaled only $ 250,000. But the women are
not
                   without their boosters, Red McCombs being the biggest. Two
events
                   led McCombs to an epiphany regarding women's sports. One
came
                   during what he described as a "good ol' Bubba" meeting
about
                   fundraising a few years back. When he asked the lone woman
in the
                   room to name the most generous donors for women's
athletics, he
                   recalls, "She looked at me like I was crazy and said, 'Mr.
                   McCombs, there are none.'"

                   Soon afterward, McCombs' young granddaughter told him that
she
                   could not find a girls' softball team to join. He realized
that
                   wasn't going to change as long as the woman in the good
ol' Bubba
                   meeting was right. So four years ago he wrote a check for
$ 3
                   million to the UT women's athletic program, the largest
single
                   gift to women's collegiate sports anyone can recall.
Earlier this
                   year the Red and Charline McCombs Softball Stadium opened
on UT's
                   campus.

                   Title IX clearly stoked the growth in college sports
programs a
                   quarter-century ago, but where will the money come from to
                   sustain future growth? There's at least some concern that
college
                   sports is already locked squarely in corporate America's
cross
                   hairs as the next sports-marketing frontier. For years
only the
                   likes of Nike, Reebok, and other sports brands had major
deals
                   with college teams. Now high-tech companies like eBay and
Nextel
                   are lining up alongside soft-drink, financial-services,
and
                   entertainment companies to sell their products and
services to
                   your kids. Companies once worried about being called crass
for
                   slapping logos on college campuses. Today there is no
shame. Take
                   the annual Texas-Oklahoma game, the meeting of two of the
most
                   celebrated rivals in college football history. For two
years now
                   it has been called the Dr Pepper Red River Shootout, also
                   sponsored by Southwestern Bell, Mercedes-Benz, Bank of
America,
                   Miller Brewing, and the Texas Land & Cattle Co., a local
                   restaurant chain. It's worth in excess of $ 100,000 to
each
                   school. Be very afraid.

                   For now, corporate deals remain only a minor revenue
source for
                   most big colleges. But as TV money and ticket prices peak,
and
                   donors get short arms and can't reach their wallets (after
a
                   couple of dog seasons, you'll see what I mean), it could
become
                   the most vital source of future growth. Texas' new deal
with
                   Nike, for instance, provides UT athletics with up to $ 1.8
million
                   in Nike gear, along with $ 850,000 in cash annually for
the next
                   nine years. That's equal to the largest sponsorship deal
in
                   college sports, and more than twice the value of the
department's
                   previous contract with Reebok.

                   While Dodds is mindful of the need to maintain some
boundaries
                   against unbridled commercialism, he's more concerned that
some
                   major college programs may be forced out of big-time
football
                   altogether because they can't keep up with escalating
costs.
                   Sometimes the scale of all this makes Dodds wistful. "What
I'd
                   like to do is maybe start over with this whole thing," he
says,
                   "because it's gotten to the point where you don't control
it, you
                   manage it, and it's a challenge."

                   Nevertheless: Texas is banking on being a leader in
e-commerce
                   for college sports. Sales through its nascent Website are
almost
                   nil. But with nearly a half-million Texas Exes out
here--and
                   Longhorn football on a roll--the upside is vast. Hook 'em,
iHorns?

                   On that Saturday afternoon in the fall when the Longhorns
grew
                   up against Nebraska, an elderly fan in dark glasses sat
quietly
                   on the front row of a luxury box at the stadium named in
his
                   honor. Darrell Royal is still greeted as "Coach Royal"
around
                   Austin. He's in awe of his surroundings, amazed that the
program
                   he helped build has become a multimillion-dollar
operation. He
                   never had to raise funds as a coach, never had to do
anything
                   but coach--and, well, fix the place up a bit. "When I
first got
                   here in 1954, there was a broken-down old shack in the end
                   zone," he says. "Caretaker lived there. It took a few
years, but
                   we finally got it torn down." He laughed at another
                   recollection: He couldn't understand why fans refused to
sit in
                   an upper section of the stadium until he ventured up and
                   realized that there were no bathrooms up there.

                   Coach Royal doesn't much bother Dodds with advice anymore,
though
                   he did mention one thing a while back: "I told him,
'Nothing
                   makes Texans as happy as winning, and it's happy folks
that
                   give.'" Like any good executive, Dodds listened well.

                   BOX STORY:

                   University of Texas Athletics Dept. Revenue 1998-99
                   $ 45.4 million

                   FOOTBALL revenue
                   $ 36.1 million

                   Donations $ 17.5 million
                   Tickets $ 10.1
                   TV (Big 12 and NCAA) $ 3.9
                   Marketing/advertising $ 1.4
                   Stadium suites $ 0.8
                   Concessions $ 0.8
                   Student fees $ 0.4
                   Other income $ 1.2

                   NONFOOTBALL revenue
                   $ 9.3 million

                   Basketball $ 6.0
                   Baseball $ 1.4
                   Other sports $ 1.9

                   SOURCE: UNIV. OF TEXAS

                   BOX STORY:

                   BIG SPENDERS

                   Budget College Athletics budget AP Top 25
                   rank in millions football rank

                   1 Ohio State $ 64.9 -
                   2 Michigan $ 47.6 10
                   3 Tennessee $ 45.0 6
                   4 Wisconsin $ 41.4 4
                   5 Texas $ 41.2 7
                   6 Florida $ 39.4 5
                   7 Kentucky $ 36.5 -
                   8 Nebraska $ 36.0 3
                   9 Alabama $ 33.4 8
                   10 Auburn $ 33.2 -
                   11 UCLA $ 33.0 -
                   12 LSU $ 32.0 -
                   13 Florida State $ 31.0 1
                   14 Notre Dame $ 30.4 -
                   15 South Carolina $ 30.1 -
                   16 Iowa $ 30.0 -
                   17 Illinois $ 28.3 -
                   18 Texas A&M $ 27.6 24
                   19 Clemson $ 27.1 -
                   20 USC $ 26.7 -
                   21 Georgia $ 26.5 16
                   22 Arizona State $ 26.5 -
                   23 Oklahoma $ 25.3 -
                   24 Arizona $ 25.0 -
                   25 Arkansas $ 24.2 17
                   26 West Virginia $ 23.0 -
                   27 Kansas $ 22.7 -
                   28 Georgia Tech $ 21.6 20
                   29 Virginia Tech $ 20.1 2

                   As of Nov. 21, 1999.
                   FORTUNE TABLE/SOURCE UNIV. OF TEXAS


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 02:03 PM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	02/14/2001 11:26 AM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Tony Wetzel"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Steven Kelley"
<steven@iepa.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steve Iliff"
<siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Ross Ain" <rain@caithnessenergy.com>,
"Roger Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Robert Lamkin"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Randy
Hickok" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Paula Soos"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Marty
McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "kent Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Ken
Hoffman" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Kate Castillo"
<ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>,
"Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "John Stout"
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco"
<joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jim Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jack
Hawks" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "Hap Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue"
<gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa" <fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Eric
Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "Eileen Koch" <eileenk@calpine.com>,
"Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "Doug
Fernley" <fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Dean Gosselin"
<dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "David Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Curt Hatton"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Craig Chancellor" <craigc@calpine.com>, "Cody
Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob Gates" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "Bob Escalante"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bill
Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill Carlson"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Larrea, John"
<John.g.Larrea@williams.com>, "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Katie
Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 cc: "Dave Modisette" <dmodis@ns.net>
		 Subject: Yesterday's Sen Hearing

The Senate Energy Committee met yesterday afternoon and passed two very
important bills.

SB 6x (Burton/Bowen), as amended, would establish a state power and
financing authority. The measure passed on a party-line vote with no
Republican votes.  What makes SB 6x interesting to IEP members is that is
provides financing through the Authority for environmental improvements to
existing powerplants 30 years or older.  IEP testified in support of the
bill if it was amended to bind Authority,s eminent domain powers.  Senator
Burton agreed and IEP is currently drafting language on this issue.
Similarly, Burton agreed to work with Senator Morrow on language that would
limit the Authority to only supplementing private power generation and not
building power plants where they are not needed.   The amended version is
attached.

SB 33x, as amended, would authorize the Governor to enter into negotiations
with the IOUs to purchase their transmission system.  The Governor,s plan
would have to be approved by the Legislature by only a majority vote.  If
approved the Treasurer would have the authority to issue revenue bonds to
pay for the transmission system.  This measure also passed on a party-line
vote.  IEP submitted written opposition to the bill as introduced, but will
continue to voice its concern with the state being both a market participant
and owning the transmission system as the bill moves through the legislative
process.  The amended version is not in print yet.

Please contact me if you have any questions.

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net

 - sbx1_6_bill_20010213_amended_sen.pdf


Hey, I was wrong. I went back and checked.  DA got as high as about 16% of total load in May 2000.  On January 1 (contracry to Herr Angelides' letter), DA was about 7.3% of load.  On February 1 it was 3.5%.

Best,
Jeff


I have an analyst in my group that does not want to move on to a third
rotation - she wants to remain with EnronOnline.  I want to send her to
London for 3 to 6 months beginning in July, and need to find out from you
what the standards are to ensure we are consistent (housing, cost of living?,
etc.) across Energy Ops.  I think we have done things like this before.

The employee is Carrie Southard.

Thanks Norma!

Sheri


Mike,

She is Yana's   friend.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000
05:44 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
09/07/2000 09:22 AM
To: Valeria.I.Stone@EXXON.sprint.com @ ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Grant
Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: RE: Informal Exploratory Interview with Enron Research Group

Correction!  Friday the "8th" not the "9th"

Thanks!

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000
09:15 AM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
09/07/2000 09:11 AM
To: Valeria.I.Stone@EXXON.sprint.com @ ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Grant
Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: RE: Informal Exploratory Interview with Enron Research Group

Valeria:

3:30pm tomorrow the 9th will be fine.  We will have to change the schedule
a little bit, but I believe it will work.

Kevin Kindall   3:30 PM
Grant Masson   4:00 PM
Tanya Tamarchenko  4:30 PM
Vince Kaminski  5:00 PM

Same scenario - upon arrival in the lobby go to the security desk and ask
for me.  I will meet you in the lobby of the 19th floor.

Thanks so much for your flexibility!

Shirley Crenshaw

Valeria.I.Stone@EXXON.sprint.com on 09/07/2000 08:56:24 AM
To: Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RE: Informal Exploratory Interview with Enron Research Group

         Date: September 7, 2000
         From: Stone, V.I. (Valeria)                       VISTONE  - AMERICAS
           To: EXT-SHIRLEY.CRENSHAW(A)ENRON.CO             SHIRLEC1 - FPEXMAIL
      Subject: RE: Informal Exploratory Interview with Enron Research Group
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure, tomorrow is fine with me.  Is it possible to schedule it at 3:30 PM?

And I am sure it is not an easy task to fit the schedule of several people to
be available at the same time window.  So please feel free to let me know if
you will need to do another time adjustment.

-----Original Message-----
From: EXT-SHIRLEY.CRENSHAW(A)ENRON.CO
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 9:47 AM
To: Stone, V.I. (Valeria)
Subject: RE: Informal Exploratory Interview with Enron Research Group

Valeria:

Please do not think we are always this unorganized, but things just seem
to be happening right now and it is disrupting everyone's schedule.

Would you possibly be able to come tomorrow the 8th?  Kevin Kindall
will not be here on the 15th and he would definately like to interview you.
Then Vince Kaminski will be gone for two weeks after the 15th.  It seems
like tomorrow might be the best time for everyone, if it is for you.

We can begin the interviews at 3:00 PM and probably end them at 5:00
or 5:30 pm.

Please let me know.

Thanks so much for your understanding.
[Stone, V.I. (Valeria)]  :
Regards,

Shirley Crenshaw

Valeria.I.Stone@EXXON.sprint.com on 09/07/2000 07:46:13 AM

To:   Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  RE: Informal Exploratory Interview with Enron Research Group

         Date: September 7, 2000
         From: Stone, V.I. (Valeria)                       VISTONE  -
AMERICAS
           To: EXT-SHIRLEY.CRENSHAW(A)ENRON.CO             SHIRLEC1 -
FPEXMAIL
      Subject: RE: Informal Exploratory Interview with Enron Research Group
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Stone, V.I. (Valeria)]  0
Definitely - any of these days sound good to me.  The only concern that I
have, is that I have my graduate class on Thursday night at 6 PM which is
September the 14th.
So if you will schedule the interview on the 14th of September, I would
need
to leave around 5:15 PM so I could attend  my  class.

It actually might be more convenient for me to meet with the interviewers
on
the 15th of September.  If this day does not fit the schedule of any of the
interested in interviewing individuals, I surely will be able to meet with
them on the 14th.

I will be looking forward to your reply.

Sincerely,

Valeria Stone

-----Original Message-----
From: EXT-SHIRLEY.CRENSHAW(A)ENRON.CO
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 4:32 PM
To: Stone, V.I. (Valeria)
Subject: RE: Informal Exploratory Interview with Enron Research Group

Valeria:

Would you be able to do the interview on the 14th or 15th instead of the
13th?  Vince Kaminski, who would really like to interview you, has been
called out of town on the 13th.  He will be back on the 14th.

Also Grant Masson is conducting an Options Seminar on the 13th and
would not be able to interview you until after 5:00 PM.

Please let me know if we can just push the interview to the same time
frame only on the 14th or 15th.

Thanks!

Shirley Crenshaw
713-853-5290


I would bet that we'll be there.  I'll bring my check book.  Is the 97 cab $32 retail?  If it is, it's worth it.

With Barry doing what he did, getting to the playoffs was icing on the cake.  But, man, that Friday night game was a heart-breaker.

We'll see you Sunday!

Kisses,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Sellers [mailto:Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 6:29 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:

No I was just glad she was so generous and I am hoping that that will
continue!

I will order the wine tomorrow if you really will be by on Sunday.  I can
only have 2 cases delivered at a time.  So I'll get the Coastal first.  It
comes to $152.74 (less $80) = $72.74

The 97 cab will be $193.50
Total = $266.24

Great Niner game - sorry about your Giants - I was rooting for them!

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 4:00 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE:

I would have been happy to let you have it.  You still can, you know.
Just let me know (though we love to keep it).  We're allegedly going to
the dome this weekend, so perhaps we could pick it up on our way back on
Sunday.  But if that's a bother, don't worry about it--we can do it
another time.  And what about those 9-ers?

-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Sellers [mailto:Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 4:15 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:

So did I!!  Thank you for the check - I appreciate it.  I was actually
kind
of hoping you wouldn't want it!  It is such great wine and I did not
expect
her to give me the 50% off or I would have bought more!  When would you
be
around to pick up your other wine?  I don't want to order it and have it
sitting in our clean garage!  Also the check you sent for golf was too
much
because you guys walked and did not take a cart.  You should have paid
$80 -
so you have an $80 credit toward wine.

Miss you guys

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 11:32 AM
To: Nancy Sellers (E-mail)
Subject:

Thanks so much for the Storybook wine.  Extremely sweet of you, and we
really appreciate it.  I gave Eldon the check for it.  Man, did we get
CREAMED in the pool.  Sigh....

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Can't wait for you to get over here!


highlights of my discussion with dave:
he wants an "opportunity" to originate out of the ees positions.  for example, the harrah's deal generated approximately $16 million relative to the mid, of which $4 went to ees.  he wants a chance to back this deal with his sourcing group.
he was unable to offer any definition around what the word "opportunity" means.  one interpretation of "opportunity" is that they get a head start, say three months to back a deal where neither west mm or west orig works on that deal for three months.  another interpretation is that west mm and west orig aren't allowed to talk to certain wholesale customers, for example the generators.  both of these are bad ideas.
i asked him why enron would want to keep its most talented origination resources on the sidelines for any period of time in order to let the kid brother (ees) have a "fair" chance at winning a deal.  i also asked him if he thought his crack squad could compete with the capabilities that we have developed in the west.  his answer was no.
i told dave that as the manager of the retail risk book i don't care who originates out of the transaction.  my thinking is that i give a copy of the harrah's contract to calger, foster, and delainey.  whoever gets us out first gets paid orig.  if people want to coordinate then that's fine.  if they want to compete head to head then that's fine.  speaking for portland, i would expect that west mm and orig would coordinate.
dave then said that he "gave" us the risk function and insinuated that we owed him something in return.  i indicated that i was willing to give it back and return to my simple life managing the west wholesale trading desk if that's what he wanted.  i think he took offense to that comment.
we hung up with no resolution.  dave called me back and proposed that we let anyone originate out of the position.  however, the origination dollars would go to ees profit center with the west mm or origination person getting the credit for that.  he talked about ees and the stock price and the billion dollar business.  my guys (i'm not speaking for chris here) don't care where the origination dollars go to so long as they get paid for bringing value.
i suggested that he work it out with you and that i would be looking for direction from you.

i'm pretty sure that dave will characterize our conversation as though we are in a agreement and that we are ready to move forward.  i would say that we agree that we need to get the best people originating out of these deals.  i would rather that the money for orig stay with whoever originated it.  i can live with a variety of outcomes.  i'll sit tight and wait for direction from you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lavorato, John
Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 5:44 AM
To:	Vickers, Frank W.; Lagrasta, Fred; Tycholiz, Barry; Luce, Laura; Duran, W. David; Calger, Christopher F.; Wolfe, Greg; Foster, Chris H.; Wolfe, Greg; Belden, Tim; Presto, Kevin M.; Mrha, Jean; Baughman, Edward D.
Cc:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:

Delainey and I started initial discussions reguarding EES and the customers and products they plan to market.  These were initial discussions.   Dave is writing something up to send to me.  Before I agree on anything I will talk to all of you.  Some of the meeting that are happening may be a little premature.

John


<<DistGen09_24.pdf>>

Jay Morse
Project Coordinator, Distributed Generation
Office of Ratepayer Advocates
California Public Utilities Commission
415-703-1587

 - DistGen09_24.pdf


Probably need to check with H R group providing services
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


[IMAGE]  	  [IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	The 'goal post' motivation factor

	Nov. 9, 2000

	[IMAGE]Chip Brown, who covers UT football for The Dallas Morning News,
answers your questions about injuries, Chris Simms, bowl prospects and more.
Inside UT Football appears on Thursdays.

	E-mail questions to Chip: chipbrown@dallasnews.com

	Listen to Chip Brown talk about the Longhorns on
	DallasNews.com's Colleges site

	Chip Shot

	After learning that the goal posts had been greased at Texas Tech to keep
fans from tearing them down if the Red Raiders had beaten Texas, the
Longhorns got some more goal post bulletin board material from Kansas.

	 Texas coach Mack Brown told his team about a story that appeared in the
Topeka Capital-Journal on Oct. 23 about how Kansas players hoped they would
be tearing down the goal posts after beating Texas this Saturday.

	 At the time, KU players quoted in the article had hoped they would be
playing Texas for their sixth win, making them bowl eligible. As it stands,
the Jayhawks (4-5, 2-4) need to beat both Texas and Iowa State.

	 Still, that didn't keep Mack Brown from telling his team about the article.

	 "I think that's insulting," said UT CB Quentin Jammer. "They'll only be let
down when it doesn't happen."

	 "That's disrespectful," said UT CB Rod Babers. "It's the same thing as Tech
lubing up the goal posts."

	 Recalling that three teams (Baylor, Missouri and Oklahoma State) tore down
goal posts after beating a 4-7 UT team in 1997, coach Mack Brown called Texas
"the goal post team."

	 On a related note, Brown is taking all kinds of measures to make his team
tougher.

	 Texas players wore jackets and head warmers in the cold and rain in Dallas
against Oklahoma. They will be without such comforts when they travel to
Kansas this weekend, where temperatures could be in the 40s.

	 "When we played in the mist up in Dallas, the players had coats on and masks
on," Mack Brown said. "We've taken those away. We don't take jackets to the
game anymore when it's cold. No masks, nothing. We're going to go with pads
and helmets and play. We're not going to stand around and let the weather be
a factor."

	 Brown also wants his team to be up and ready despite playing to a crowd that
will likely be sparse at KU on Saturday.

	 "There won't be anybody there," Brown said, referring to the fact that KU
has averaged 33,220 fans at home this season.

	 KU's largest crowd at Memorial Stadium (capacity 50,250) was 48,500 for
Kansas State on Oct. 7.

	Longhorn Q & A
	 Q: Since freshman DT Stevie Lee is out for the year now and he still has
redshirt eligibility, can he get a medical redshirt for his injury?
	 ?? Rick Orr

	 BROWN:  Mack Brown said this week that the plan is for Lee (foot) to seek a
medical redshirt and thus have four years of eligibility after this season.
	?

	[IMAGE]
	Shaun Rogers

	Q: I know Shaun Rogers' play has been limited since his ankle sprain against
Houston. How many snaps has he been getting over the last several games? At
one point during the Tech game, I thought I saw Adam Doiron and Marcus Tubbs
on the field at the same time playing tackle. I know these freshmen are
playing great, but I figured either Shawn or Casey Hampton would always be on
the field to give the line the benefit of their experience. Please provide a
rundown of the tackle rotation.
	?? Dan McCrory

	 BROWN:  Rogers has been getting between 20 and 30 snaps per game. But that
high ankle sprain has really taken a toll. He's not the same player he was
before the Houston game. Still, he wants to stay out on the field, even
though he is not 100 percent. Tubbs and Doiron were out on the field together
against Tech for several plays - several key plays. Mack Brown said Tubbs and
Doiron had the quickness to hold their own against Tech's inexperienced,
undersized offensive line. I don't know how often you'll see a tackle tandem
that doesn't include Casey Hampton, but against Tech, the coaches felt they
would have to play four defensive ends and four defensive tackles. That's
because of the number of pass rushers needed to get pressure on the QB.
Against a running team, you probably would see Hampton as part of the DT
tandem in the game.
	?

	 Q: Can you update us on the injuries?
	?? Lars Mechlenberg

	 BROWN:  Major Applewhite is out for Kansas with a sprained posterior
cruciate ligament in his right knee. He is questionable for Texas A?on Nov.
24. WR Artie Ellis (shin) is out for Saturday. CB Ervis Hill (shoulder) is
out for the season and may need surgery. DT Ryan Haywood (shoulder) is out
for the season and has already undergone surgery. SS Lee Jackson (quadriceps)
is questionable, and LB O.J. McClintock (knee) is probable. Coaches would
like to get McClintock back on the field this week on special teams.
	?

	 Q: I noticed you mentioned in one of your articles that Texas was still
trying to put together its first complete game of the season. I couldn't
agree more. I don't recall a season where we really haven't played a good
game yet this late in the season, especially given the talent we are putting
on the field. I'm also concerned about the number of penalties we are
committing. I've read that Mack thinks these reflect enthusiasm and emotion,
but I watch too many teams play with as much or more emotion and remain
disciplined. Do you think we have a coaching problem or is it just youth?
	?? Ken Hines, Wichita Falls

	 BROWN:  OG Antwan Kirk-Hughes told me this week that the team thought it
would go out to Stanford and win easily. In other words, the team took the
Cardinal lightly. Thus, when the Cardinal played the Longhorns tough (and
ultimately won), Texas got tight and struggled. I think this season has been
one with little to get up for. The teams on UT's schedule were - for the most
part - awful. Texas knew going into the season that it was going to be at
least a 10-point favorite in every game except for Oklahoma and Texas A&M.
The Longhorns have beaten only one team with a winning record - Texas Tech.
My point is, once Texas suffered the shock of losing to Stanford, it lost
some of its sense of urgency. Its dream of a national title - realistic or
unrealistic - was over. By the time Texas played Oklahoma, the Longhorns had
played only a couple halves of complete football - the second half against
Louisiana-Lafayette and the second half against Oklahoma State. That wasn't
nearly enough to build the kind of confidence needed to face the Sooners. For
whatever reason (some will argue it was the QB rotation), the offensive
coaches weren't able to instill an identity or swagger into their players.
Whether this is because of a lack of leadership on offense or because the
team couldn't get up for the Houstons and Baylors of the world, only the
coaches and players really know. But, in my opinion, Texas has not yet put a
complete game together - nine games into the season. And it's because of the
offense. The defense has been solid with the exception of Oklahoma. The
offense has been slow starting, erratic and even predictable. To UT's credit,
the offense is about to set a single-season passing yardage record by
averaging 289.4 yards passing per game. If Texas wins its next two games and
wins its bowl game, the Longhorns would be 10-2 and that would be an
improvement over last year and hard to argue with. So, perhaps Texas can take
the fire it showed in the first quarter against Tech and put its first
complete game together this week. A three-game winning streak to end the
season would be a great launch pad into next season, when UT will again have
a chance for greatness against a schedule of tackling dummies.
	?

	 Q: I am thinking that palm trees and balmy sunsets may be in the Longhorns'
immediate holiday plans: either the Orange Bowl, if all goes perfectly, or
more likely the Culligan Holiday Bowl in San Diego. Do you think Mack Brown
would relish a game against Rick Neuheisel? Texas vs. Washington would make
for great TV, and a wonderful trip for the 'Horns and their many fans.
	?? James K. Sterrett

	 BROWN:  This is a better question for next week because we'll know the
outcome of the Texas A&M-Oklahoma game. If Oklahoma and Nebraska both win out
and meet in the Big 12 title game, a narrow Nebraska win would probably land
both in a BCS bowl game. A narrow Oklahoma win might still land them both in
the BCS. But a lopsided win by either Oklahoma or Nebraska would probably
mean the winner going to a BCS bowl game and the loser going to the Cotton.
If A?loses to Oklahoma and UT beats Kansas, the winner of the UT-A?game would
probably be playing for the Holiday Bowl with the loser going to the Alamo
Bowl. The Holiday Bowl opponent would appear to be either Oregon State or
Washington. The Alamo Bowl opponent would appear to be either Michigan or
Ohio State. I think any of those opponents would probably catch the attention
of Texas, except for maybe Oregon State, which is really good.
	?

	[IMAGE]
	Carl Reese

	Q: Missouri head coach Larry Smith is probably on his way out of Columbia
after this season. Carl Reese is a perfect candidate for that position with
all of his Missouri ties. Do you see coach Reese taking off for Columbia?
	 ?? Michael Sampson

	 BROWN:  Reese has indicated to Mack Brown that he has no interest in
becoming a head coach. He is getting close to 60, and I think he would like
to focus all of his efforts on building a national title contender in Austin.
Don't look for Reese to go anywhere.

	?

	 Q: What is the status of Austin Sendlein? I never heard if he redshirted and
I have not heard of him playing.
	?? David W. Rhodes

	 BROWN:  The Stanford player participation chart showed LB Sendlein playing.
But he has not played and will be redshirted this season. He is among a
handful of players redshirting who the veterans have said look really good in
practice. The other redshirts drawing raves are QB Chance Mock, RB Sneezy
Beltran, FB Will Matthews, WR Tony Jeffery and OL Lionel Garr.
	?

	 Q: Is it me or do we get some really sorry calls  from the officials? It's
always been my opinion that referees' calls were  just part of the game and
if you're not good enough to overcome some bad  calls, well, you're just not
good enough. That said, however, we seem to  have some of the worst calls
going against us in the last few years and in  almost every game. Are the
officials held to any standard by the Big 12 or  an officiating group? If
it's not the officials, we have got to do something  about all these
penalties.
	 ?? P.M., Midland

	 BROWN:  I, too, hate talking about penalties. But while Mack Brown can't
talk about the penalties being called because he'll be fined by the Big 12,
he can complain to the officials on the field. And he can send a videotape of
calls that he thinks are questionable to the league office. And let's just
say Brown has sent plenty of videotapes to the league office this season.
Brown is calling for instant replay in the college game. He said the NFL's
instant replay has shown how many calls are missed in a football game. He
hopes that schools will bite the bullet and vote in favor of this even though
it would be a sizable expense to most schools and would slow the game down.
Brown can't discuss the penalties that have been called on Texas this season,
but if he could, his face would be red, and he wouldn't be able to stop
talking.
	?

	[IMAGE]
	Kenny Hayter

	Q: Is there anything physically wrong with Kenny Hayter that is limiting his
playing time? Or is this just the coaching staff's decision? I will be one of
the many to admit that Hodges Mitchell and the offensive line have looked a
lot better over the past four games. If Hayter had better per-carry numbers
than Mitchell with an underperforming offensive line, it would seem to me
that Hayter would also do well now that they are blocking better. I would
like to point out that I do not advocate benching Mitchell by any means, but
after this week's game and all of the talk I have heard about him being
durable or not, I think that a more balanced backfield would help out in this
situation.
	?? Jason Patton

	 BROWN:  The coaches have stuck with Mitchell because he is a senior leader
on an offense that doesn't have many leaders and because he is such a
versatile threat as a running back and receiver. Mitchell has suddenly
climbed within 235 yards of a 1,000-yard rushing season (765 yards) and has
337 yards receiving (he'll surpass last year's 343 yards receiving). Mitchell
has a 4.7-yard per carry average, the best on the team among RBs except for
Brett Robin, who has just five carries for 27 yards (5.4 yards per carry).
The coaches will stick with Mitchell from here on in because the offense
finally showed against Tech that it can gain rushing yards in the first half
of a game. Now, granted, it was against an undersized defensive line that
emphasized its quickness over bulk. But Mack Brown seems to think his team is
finally getting tougher and beginning to control the offensive line of
scrimmage. Kansas has a salty defensive line, led by NG Nate Dwyer (6-3,
300). So, we'll see if the Longhorns' offensive line can continue to push
people around.
	?

	 Q: How does Major Applewhite's injury problems effect Chris Simms' possible
redshirt status for next year?
	?? Monte Boothe

	 BROWN:  It's too early to tell. Mack Brown said he had a conversation with
Simms about redshirting next season but that the earliest it could seriously
be considered is after spring practice, if not next fall.
	?

	 Q: It seems that many Horn fans are still in shock from the 63-14 debacle in
the Cotton Bowl and are wondering if OU is suddenly that far ahead of Texas
in the development of their respective programs. Are they? Or was this just a
total meltdown by a young UT team? Can we expect better results next year and
if so, why?
	?? Mark, Lewisville

	 BROWN:  I think the OU coaches deserve a lot of credit for getting their
players to pull together and show the kind of effort they have on both sides
of the ball. That kind of coaching job is what it's all about. But I don't
think you can underestimate the influence that Josh Heupel has had on that
team. He makes every part of that offense effective. Tremendous credit goes
to the defensive coaches for getting their players to put the brakes on teams
like Texas, Kansas State and Nebraska. This has been a phenomenal coaching
job. And no disrespect to OU, but next year, without Heupel, I think they
will drop off slightly (maybe 8-3). Maybe not. But it seems likely.
	?

	 Q: I thought Mack Brown's philosophy on redshirts is that he will take them
off ANY player at ANY point in the season if we need that player to help us
win. Does having Beau Trahan as the backup QB for Kansas give us a better
chance of winning the game (if Simms goes down) than Chance Mock? From what
Mack says, Mock is not even a consideration (since Courtnee Garcia is the
emergency QB).
	?? Glen Shillinglaw, Austin

	 BROWN:  I think Brown is banking on the fact that Simms survives the Kansas
game and Major comes back to start or at least back up Simms in an emergency
situation against Texas A&M. On Tuesday, Mack Brown announced that Hunter
McWilliams, and not WR Courtnee Garcia, would be the team's third
quarterback. McWilliams, the son of former UT coach David McWilliams, runs
the scout team QB position in practice and has more experience handing off
this season than Garcia, who was an option QB at Lufkin. Brown said he would
take the redshirt off of Mock if he absolutely had to, meaning if both Simms
and Applewhite went down with season-ending injuries. But he said to do so
right now would be premature because Simms is OK, and there's a chance that
Applewhite will be back for A&M.
	?

	 Q: Is there any chance for Texas to take the Big 12 South? Hopefully A?beats
OU this weekend, this can't hurt.

	 BROWN:  Oklahoma would have to lose two of its last three games at Texas
A&M, home against Texas Tech or at Oklahoma State. Texas would then have to
beat Kansas and Texas A?to win the Big 12 South. Texas A?can win the Big 12
South title by beating Oklahoma and Texas.

	 If you received this newsletter from a friend and would like to subscribe,
sign up at:   Newsletter Registration

	To find or change your password, modify your account, or unsubscribe from
this newsletter, go to:   Newsletter Registration

	Questions?    Comments?  Suggestions?

	   (c) Copyright 2000 The Dallas Morning News
		[IMAGE]

			  [IMAGE]
			  [IMAGE]
			  [IMAGE]


---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2001
02:53 PM ---------------------------

"Pamela Anderson" <pama9@flash.net> on 01/17/2001 01:59:09 PM
To: "Sandra Brawner" <Sandra.F.Brawner@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: IT'S GOOD TO BE A MAN

Sandra,
I think you will enjoy this one.  I can see you giggling right now.
Pam
----- Original Message -----
From: Sue Caldwell <sue@mbainsurance.net>
To: Pam Anderson <Pama9@flash.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 12:54 PM
Subject: Fw: IT'S GOOD TO BE A MAN

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Tietjen" <stasports@mindspring.com>
> To: "Abbey Lynch" <klynch@flyfrontier.com>; "Brenda & Don Ott"
> <b&dott@onemain.com>; "Cal & Lisa" <tacoma@iws.net>; "Debbie Kerinke"
> <dkerinke@ddrcco.com>; "Diane JENSEN" <dejensen@qwest.net>; "Ed & Jan
> Boykin" <edjanboykin@aol.com>; "Frank Stasko" <fstasko@4dvision.net>;
"Kelly
> Lynch" <klynch@flyfrontier.com>; "Kenney Turnbaugh"
<xbananasx@hotmail.com>;
> "Leslie Freedman" <lafreedman@uswest.com>; "Marty Scott"
> <user21275@uswest.net>; "Sandee DeVore" <sandraDV@aol.com>; "Steve Wilbur"
> <swejon@uswest.net>; "Sue" <sue@mbainsurance.net>; "Terry Lackey"
> <twlackey@aol.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 11:20 AM
> Subject: FW: IT'S GOOD TO BE A MAN
>
>
> >
> >
> > > IT'S GOOD TO BE A MAN
> >
> > > > >Your last name stays put.
> > > > >The garage is all yours.
> > > > >Wedding plans take care of themselves.
> > > > >Chocolate is just another snack.
> > > > >You can be president.
> > > > >You can wear a white T-shirt to a water park.
> > > > >Car mechanics tell you the truth.
> > > > >You don't give a rat's ass if someone notices your new haircut.
> > > > >Same work...more pay.
> > > > >Wrinkles add character.
> > > > >Wedding Dress $5,000; Tux rental $100.
> > > > >People never stare at your chest when you're talking to them.
> > > > >New shoes don't cut, blister, or mangle your feet.
> > > > >One mood, ALL the damn time.
> > > > >A five-day vacation requires only one suitcase.
> > > > >You can open all your own jars.
> > > > >You can kill your own food.
> > > > >You get extra credit for the slightest act of thoughtfulness.
> > > > >Your underwear is $8.95 for a three-pack.
> > > > >Three pairs of shoes are more than enough.
> > > > >You can drop by to see a friend without having to bring a little
> gift.
> > > > >If another guy shows up at the party in the same outfit, you just
> might
> > > > >become lifelong friends.
> > > > >You are not expected to know the names of more than five colors.
> > > > >You don't have to stop and think of which way to turn a nut on a
> bolt.
> > > > >You almost never have strap problems in public.
> > > > >You are unable to see wrinkles in your clothes.
> > > > >The same hairstyle lasts for years, maybe decades.
> > > > >You don't have to shave below your neck.
> > > > >One wallet and one pair of shoes, one color, all seasons.
> > > > >You can "do" your nails with a pocketknife.
> > > > >You have freedom of choice concerning growing a mustache.
> > > > >Christmas shopping can be accomplished for 25 relatives on December
> > > > >24th, in 45 minutes.
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> >
>
>


I set it as my new wallpaper.  The file was too big - SU wouldn't let it come
in.


Yes, Dennis, we got it by e-mail and fax.  Thanks.

"Buckley, Dennis" <Buckley@puc.state.pa.us> on 11/30/2000 07:56:07 AM
To: "'kenneth.lay@enron.com'" <kenneth.lay@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: John Quain Info

 <<points1.doc>>  <<JMQres.doc>>
Rosalie:

Chairman Quain asked me to forward these to Dr. Lay for his consideration.

Please let me know when you get these, and if you can open them.

Thanks!

Dennis J. Buckley
Counsel to the Chairman

 - points1.doc
 - JMQres.doc


Done.... for dinner, let's have perogie... what do you think?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim & Barry Tycholiz [mailto:ktycholiz@houston.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 10:07 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: half marathon training schedule

www.jeffgalloway.com <http://www.jeffgalloway.com>
Click on training & then 1/2 marathon, I'm sure you can  figure it out!
Thanks. What's for dinner?
KIM  XOXOXOX


I was considering opening an account to trade commodities on my own.  What
are the implications?

Thanks,

Yannis Tzamouranis

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mark Taylor @ ENRON                           06/21/2000 06:39 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Houston, Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary, Everyone_in_ECT_London,
Everyone_in_ECT_Portland, Everyone_in_ECT_New York, Everyone_in_ECT_Denver,
Everyone_in_ECT_Oslo, Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore, EI-Australia, Buenos Aires
Argentina - Office Staff, Buenos Aires Argentina - TGS Office Staff, Enron
Everyone_EOG_Denver, Enron Everyone_EOG_Calgary
cc:
Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any other
related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with
another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business Friday, June 30,
2000 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest
in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading
affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


The attached news release was sent over PRNewswire early this morning.

(See attached file: Evista Early Effects Release.doc)

 - Evista Early Effects Release.doc