I doubt I'll get a chance to get down to Portland before you go.  In any
case, I wish you all success.

Stan

-----Original Message-----
From: Mary.Hain@enron.com [mailto:Mary.Hain@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 10:24 AM
To: David_Aamodt@pgn.com; dapnucc@teleport.com; dick@pnucc.org;
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com; Frank_Afranji@pgn.com;
raa@vnf.com; Joseph.Alamo@enron.com; ajaldrich@snopud.com;
Jeff.Alexander@enron.com; Al.Alexanderson@enron.com;
Keonee.Almaida@enron.com; hollis.alpert@ferc.fed.us;
Brenda.Anderson@enron.com; angles@howry.com; Alan.B.Aronowitz@enron.com;
gdb@vnf.com; npbaker@bpa.gov; ellen@tca-us.com; paulb@citizenspower.com;
paulb@citizenspower.com; garybarbour@email.msn.com;
jbartus@cammckenna.com; glynda.becker@mail.house.gov;
Samuel.Behrends@enron.com; bbennett@bpa.gov; sberman@hewm.com;
ramsen.betfarhad@mail.house.gov; KBILAS@SKADDEN.COM; sbooye@Skadden.com;
raymond.r.boyce@state.or.us; tbradley@bracepatt.com;
scott.brattebo@pacificorp.com; sbrose@steptoe.com;
sbuchheit@bracepatt.com; alanb@wutc.wa.gov; Jim.Byrne@enron.com;
vergil.cabasco@mail.house.gov; johncameron@dwt.com;
Doug.Carmichael@enron.com; Ed.Cassidy@enron.com; ajchambe@llgm.com;
Melissa.Chiechi@enron.com; elchristensen@snopud.com;
kevin.clark@ci.seattle.wa.us; rcloward@avistacorp.com;
david_cohen@rniinc.com; Bill.Comish@enron.com;
Victor.Contract@enron.com; powerlac@aol.com;
Frederick.Coolbroth@enron.com; michaelcorrigan@bchydro.bc.ca;
kcorum@nwppc.org; KCurry@bracepatt.com; wcurry@enron.com;
gdahlke@paine-hamblen.com; kadaly@mcimail.com; mday@gmssr.com;
dearing@chelanpud.org; tdeboer@paine-hamblen.com; Tom_Delaney@enron.com;
sdleonard@earthlink.net; dldorrell@stoel.com; Mary.Doyle@enron.com;
Jay.Dudley@enron.com; mce2280@idahopower.com;
michaelearly@earthlink.net; Katherine.Edwards@enron.com;
rle@givenspursley.com; imaxtrans@aol.com; Chris.Elliott@enron.com;
sandra.elliott@ferc.fed.us; kerwin@ect.enron.com; dezickson@mwe.com;
Jim.Fallon@enron.com; fallonr@howrey.com; Elias.Farrah@enron.com;
Michele_Farrell@pgn.com; dfaulk@puget.com; gfergus@brobeck.com;
Willard.Fields@enron.com; sfisher@avistaenergy.com; pfox@bracepatt.com;
Pat.Franklin@enron.com; John.Frazzell@enron.com; ericf@prestongates.com;
don.furman@pacificorp.com; segfurst@bpa.gov; Jackie.Gallagher@enron.com;
craiggannett@dwt.com; Alvaro.Garcia@enron.com; sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com;
wgibson@nwppc.org; ggilbert@ci.tacoma.wa.us; Pat.Gilman@enron.com;
Alex.Goldberg@enron.com; jlgreene@energyadvocates.com;
Chris_Groener@mail.house.gov; Mary.Groggin@enron.com;
Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com; Stephen.Hall@enron.com;
steve.c.hall@enron.com; Leo.Hamblin@enron.com; whannaford@NWPPC.org;
jim.harding@ci.seattle.wa.us; rhardy@hardyenergy.com; kharri@puget.com;
Steve_Hawke@pgn.com; dhawkins@caiso.com; marc.hellman@state.or.us;
Scott.Helyer@enron.com; mhenry@bracepatt.com; dwmp@teleport.com;
rhornby@tca-us.com; mhornst@aol.com; dhuard@jmbm.com;
Marlene.Huntsinger@pgn.com; cfi1@tca-us.com;
Richard.Ingersoll@enron.com; pljacklin@stoel.com; montrey@aol.com;
danj@cfmdc.com; kgjohnson@bpa.gov; ljohnson@pwrteam.com;
Karen.E.Jones@enron.com; mkanner@kannerandassoc.com;
karid@perkinscoie.com; pkaufma@ect.enron.com; Paul.Kaufman@enron.com;
Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com; Devon Kehoe; James.Keller@enron.com;
Joe.Kelliher@mail.house.gov; kkennedy@bdbc.com; Rick.Kessler@enron.com;
rdking@bpa.gov; Harry.Kingerski@enron.com; Harry.Kingerski@enron.com;
rsk@schwabe.com; gwilliams8@austin.rr.com; John.Klauberg@enron.com;
Holli.Krebs@enron.com; ekrogh@wiredweb.com; blafferty@avistacorp.com;
wdlamb@bpa.gov; John.Lamb@enron.com; Therese.Lamb@enron.com;
srlarson@bpa.gov; Cindy_Tatham@co.washington.or.us;
zora.lazic@bchydro.com; kaleathley@bpa.gov; pamela_lesh@pgn.com;
Debi.LeVine@enron.com; lcg@europa.com; doug.little@powerex.com;
Robert.Loeffler@enron.com; Chris.Long@enron.com; sjlong@bpa.gov;
rlopezv@www.conet.com.mx; david_lucio@iep.illinova.com;
king.lum@bchydro.bc.ca; kevin.lynch@pacificorp.com;
Mark.Maehr@enron.com; Randal.T.Maffett@enron.com;
John.Malowney@enron.com; Sueyen.Mao@enron.com; Susan.J.Mara@enron.com;
Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; Lee.Martin@enron.com; maurw@perkinscoie.com;
Wayne.Mays@enron.com; Michael.McCall@enron.com;
Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com; Travis.McCullough@enron.com;
Michael.McDonald@enron.com; brugen@erols.com; mckinley@wpuda.org;
mcm@vnf.com; mcnichol@wapa.com; shauna@pnucc.org;
Maureen.McVicker@enron.com; pmeringolo@brobeck.com; demetcalf@bpa.gov;
cemeyer@bpa.gov; jmilegich@sppc.com; fred_miller@pgn.com;
Jeffrey.Miller@enron.com; jerry.miller@pacificorp.com;
Laura.Miller@enron.com; scott.miller@ferc.fed.us; Bill.Miner@enron.com;
phil_moeller@gorton.senate.gov; pmohler@hewm.com; emoler@velaw.com;
nkmorgado@bpa.gov; Mike@tonkon.com; krmoxness@bpa.gov;
mmps@millcreeklaw.com; pmurphy@mbllp.com; terrym@millcreeklaw.com;
bmurtha@acy.sunint.com; Rich.Nassief@enron.com; tod@mgninc.com;
Douglas_Nichols@pgn.com; Patty.Nichols@enron.com;
Christi.Nicolay@enron.com; tmnoguchi@bpa.gov; darcy@tonkon.com;
Sarah.Novasel@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com;
Tom.O'Donnell@enron.com; PObenchain@idahopower.com; Pegy.Olds@enron.com;
Carol.Opatrny@enron.com; tpaine@avistacorp.com; Dave.Parquet@enron.com;
bpascoe@mtpower.com; afpaschke@bpa.gov; ccperigo@bpa.gov;
wlpernas@stoel.com; lpeters@pacifier.com; jill@pnucc.org;
Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com; npickover@bracepatt.com;
Phillip.Platter@enron.com; Alfred.Pollard@enron.com;
Walt.Pollock@enron.com; gporter@sppc.com; Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com;
jquint@puget.com; arlene.ragozin@ci.seattle.wa.us; maraschio@bpa.gov;
Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com; Scott.Rasmussen@enron.com;
Bobby.Reeves@enron.com; preiten@pngc.com; reyna2r@kochind.com;
shellyr@pacifier.com; Jeff.Richter@enron.com; raroach@bpa.gov;
atrodrigues@bpa.gov; rarogers@bpa.gov; peterroi@erols.com;
Rothfelder@rlo-law.com; Richard.Sanders@enron.com; jsaven@pacifier.com;
Michael.Schilmoeller@enron.com; jschlect@avistacorp.com;
Sabine.Schnittger@frontier-economics.com; Diana.Scholtes@enron.com;
Roger.Seifert@enron.com; Cara.Semperger@enron.com;
asettanni@bracepatt.com; Richard.Shapiro@enron.com; vsharp@enron.com;
msmith1@enron.com; Joshua.Sheinkman@enron.com; jshurts@nwppc.org;
Sid@enron.com; msizer@ci.tacoma.wa.us; slavens.paula@deps.ppl.com;
small@wrightlaw.com; small@wrightlaw.com; douglas.smith@ferc.fed.us;
Mike.Smith@enron.com; Roger.Smith@enron.com; Larry.Soderquist@enron.com;
Harvey.Spigal@enron.com; mstauffer@mtpower.com;
James.D.Steffes@enron.com; James.D.Steffes@enron.com;
mestewardpsedc@worldnet.att.net; JKStier@BPA.gov;
rbstrong@paine-hamblen.com; DASwanstrom@Verner.com;
Mike.Swerzbin@enron.com; tabors@tca-us.com; Ron.Tapscott@enron.com;
James.K.Tarpey@enron.com; Jake.Thomas@enron.com;
ryan_thomas@burns.senate.gov; jrt2058@idahopower.com; maryann@pnucc.org;
mtierney@sempra.com; robin_tompkins@pgn.com; Ann.Tumlinson@enron.com;
AW.Turner@enron.com; Sheila.Tweed@enron.com; Lisa.Urick@enron.com;
rvermeers@avistacorp.com; Frank.W.Vickers@enron.com;
John.Walley@enron.com; kristiwallis@sprintmail.com; walshl@howrey.com;
swalton@enron.com; Steve.Walton@enron.com; kaward@bpa.gov;
Kim.Ward@enron.com; Carol.Wardell@enron.com; dwatkiss@bracepatt.com;
sawatson@bpa.gov; judy.welch@NWPP.ORG; 211-6155@MCIMAIL.COM;
Kwenzel@zzz.com; cwestadt@sppc.com; Brian.Whalen@enron.com;
Bill.Williams@enron.com; klwmtp@worldnet.att.net; lyn_williams@pgn.com;
Greg.Wolfe@enron.com; Vickie.Wolk-Laniewski@enron.com;
Ed.Wood@enron.com; mwood@stoel.com; Steve.Wright@enron.com;
Teresa.L.Wright@enron.com; WSCC@enron.com; Charles.Yeung@enron.com;
Christian.Yoder@enron.com; Steven.J.Kean@enron.com;
Steve.Kean@enron.com; Travel.in.the.Park@enron.com;
D.Brett.Hunsucker@enron.com; Carla.Hoffman@enron.com;
Bernadette.Hawkins@enron.com; Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com;
Donna.Fulton@enron.com; Roger.Fragua@enron.com;
James.B.Fallon@enron.com; Michael.Etringer@enron.com;
Terry.W.Donovan@enron.com; Stacy.Dickson@enron.com;
Ginger.Dernehl@enron.com; Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com;
Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; Sean.Crandall@enron.com; Tom.Briggs@enron.com;
t.briggs@enron.com; Stacey.Bolton@enron.com; dbenevid@enron.com;
dbenevid@enron.com; Tim.Belden@enron.com; Robert.Badeer@enron.com;
Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com; Alan.Comnes@enron.com; Lysa.Akin@enron.com;
Portland.West.Desk@enron.com; assad@elektro.com.br;
Alan.Comnes@enron.com; Alberto.Levy@enron.com; Aleck.Dadson@enron.com;
Allison.Navin@enron.com; Amy.Fabian@enron.com;
Barbara.A.Hueter@enron.com; Bernadette.Hawkins@enron.com;
Bill.Moore@enron.com; cristinah@elektro.com.br;
Carlos.Gustavo.Azevedo@enron.com; Carmen.Perez@enron.com;
Carolyn.Cooney@enron.com; Charles.Yeung@enron.com;
Chauncey.Hood@enron.com; Chris.Long@enron.com;
Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com; Cynthia.Sandherr@enron.com;
Damon.Harvey@enron.com; Dan.Staines@enron.com;
Daniel.Allegretti@enron.com; Dave.Mangskau@enron.com;
Donald.Lassere@enron.com; Donna.Fulton@enron.com; Eidy.Catala@enron.com;
Elizabeth.Linnell@enron.com; Frank.Rishe@enron.com;
Geriann.Warner@enron.com; Ginger.Dernehl@enron.com;
Gisele.S.Braz@enron.com; Gloria.Ogenyi@enron.com;
Guillermo.Canovas@enron.com; Harry.Kingerski@enron.com;
Howard.Fromer@enron.com; James.D.Steffes@enron.com;
Janine.Migden@enron.com; Javier.Pantoja@enron.com;
Jean.R.Dressler@enron.com; Jean.Ryall@enron.com; Jeff.Brown@enron.com;
Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com;
Joao.Paixao@enron.com; Joe.Allen@enron.com; Joe.Connor@enron.com;
Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; Joe.Hillings@enron.com; Jose.Bestard@enron.com;
Joseph.Alamo@enron.com; Kathleen.Sullivan@enron.com;
Kerry.Stroup@enron.com; Kikumi.Kishigami@enron.com;
Kirsten.Bellas@enron.com; Lara.Leibman@enron.com;
Laurie.Knight@enron.com; Leslie.Lawner@enron.com;
Linda.J.Noske@enron.com; Linda.Robertson@enron.com;
Lindsay.Meade@enron.com; Lisa.Yoho@enron.com; Lora.Sullivan@enron.com;
Luiz.Maurer@enron.com; Lysa.Akin@enron.com; Marchris.Robinson@enron.com;
Marcia.A.Linton@enron.com; Marcie.Milner@enron.com; Mary.Hain@enron.com;
Maureen.McVicker@enron.com; Melinda.Pharms@enron.com;
Michelle.Belzak@enron.com; Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com;
Nancy.Hetrick@enron.com; Patrick.Keene@enron.com; Ray.Alvarez@enron.com;
Rebecca.W.Cantrell@enron.com; Ricardo.Charvel@enron.com;
Richard.Ingersoll@enron.com; Richard.Shapiro@enron.com;
Robert.Frank@enron.com; Robert.Hemstock@enron.com;
Robert.Neustaedter@enron.com; Robin.Kittel@enron.com;
Ron.McNamara@enron.com; rboston@enron.com; Rubena.Buerger@enron.com;
Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com;
Scott.Bolton@enron.com; Sergio.Assad@enron.com; Stella.Chan@enron.com;
Stephen.D.Burns@enron.com; Steve.Montovano@enron.com;
Steve.Walton@enron.com; Steven.J.Kean@enron.com; Sue.Nord@enron.com;
Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; Susan.M.Landwehr@enron.com;
Terri.Miller@enron.com; Thane.Twiggs@enron.com; Tom.Briggs@enron.com;
Tom.Chapman@enron.com; Tom.Delaney@enron.com; Tom.Hoatson@enron.com;
Tracy.Cooper@enron.com; Valeria.Lima@enron.com; Vinio.Floris@enron.com;
Xi.Xi@enron.com; Steven.J.Kean@enron.com; Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com;
Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com;
Robert.Frank@enron.com; Lara.Leibman@enron.com; Gloria.Ogenyi@enron.com;
Richard.Shapiro@enron.com; Leslie.Lawner@enron.com;
Paul.Kaufman@enron.com; Aleck.Dadson@enron.com;
Daniel.Allegretti@enron.com; Howard.Fromer@enron.com;
Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; rboston@enron.com; Janine.Migden@enron.com;
Christie.Patrick@enron.com; Jane.Wilson@enron.com;
Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com; kmagruder@newpower.com; scovino@newpower.com;
Rebecca.Carter@enron.com; Shelley.Corman@enron.com;
Janet.Butler@enron.com; Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com;
Brad.Richter@enron.com; Greg.Piper@enron.com; Kevin.McGowan@enron.com;
Kim.Ward@enron.com; Leslie.Reeves@enron.com
Subject: I'm Leaving Enron

I am going to be the Senior Regulatory Counsel at ISO New England starting
on April 9, 2001.   My last day in the Portland area will be March 31,
2001.  I enjoyed working with you and wish you the best of everything.  My
new address will be:

Mary Hain
Senior Regulatory Counsel
ISO New England Inc.
One Sullivan Road
Holyoke, MA  01040-2841
(413) 535-4000
mhain@ISO-NE.com


Robin

I just have a question for item 2)  Some of the deals are multimonth deals.
How can I have a uniquie master deal id for each line if there is only one
TAGG number for all of the months and I need to break out each month
separately.
Kathy

Robin Rodrigue
07/06/2000 04:50 PM
To: Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Spreadsheet Format

Kathy,

I spoke with the system administrators today and they gave me several more
guidelines for the text files.

1) The Book ID must be an existing book (Please use the same book id every
day).  Also please Sort the Book Id by risk type (ie IMCan-Erms-xl-GDL, then
IMCAN-ERMS-XL-PHY, then IMCAN-ERMS-XL-PRC.)

2) The Master Deal Id must be a unique number per line.

3) The reference date must be in the following format D-MMM-YY.

4) MTM Value Amount must be a NUMBER.  If there is no position please use a
zero.

5) The GROSS POSITION and DELTA POSITION must be a value.  No commas, no
dashes, no links, and no #REF errors.  Again if there is no position please
use a zero.

The guidelines apply to all text files that must be loaded into GRMS.  If you
have any question, please give me a call.

Thanks,
Robin


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Dr. Burbridge Leave at 10:00 for 10:30 appt.

Date:		2/13/2001
Time:		10:00 AM - 11:30 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Reservation status has changed. Details of the reservation are listed below:
ASSIGNMENT_REF = 7569
SELLER_CODE = TEPC
SELLER_DUNS = 006902704
CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI
CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276
AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0
PATH_NAME = W/TEP/COR500SVL345/CORONADO-SPRINGERVILLE
POINT_OF_RECEIPT = CORONADO500
POINT_OF_DELIVERY = SPRINGER345
SOURCE = SRP
SINK = EPE
CAPACITY = 50
CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 50
SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY
TS_CLASS = NON-FIRM
TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT
TS_PERIOD = ON_PEAK
TS_WINDOW = FIXED
TS_SUBCLASS = TRANS
NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1
OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default
START_TIME = 07/30/2001
STOP_TIME = 07/30/2001
CEILING_PRICE = 6.52
OFFER_PRICE = 3.00
BID_PRICE = 3.00
PRICE_UNITS = $/MWh
PRECONFIRMED = YES
ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A
ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A
POSTING_REF = 0
SALE_REF =
REQUEST_REF =
DEAL_REF =
NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG =
STATUS = CONFIRMED
STATUS_NOTIFICATION = BILL.WILLIAMS.III@ENRON.COM
STATUS_COMMENTS =
TIME_QUEUED = 07/30/2001

TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 07/30/2001
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_COMMENTS =
CUSTOMER_COMMENTS = SCHEDULE FROM HE14PPT TO HE17PPT
SELLER_NAME = TEPC
SELLER_PHONE = (520)745-7193
SELLER_FAX = (520)571-4036
SELLER_EMAIL = ChrisD@TucsonElectric.com
CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801
CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272
CUSTOMER_EMAIL = bill.rust@enron.com
REASSIGNED_REF = 0
REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0


As we discussed.

Stuart

----- Forwarded by Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 12:20 PM -----

	"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>
	11/30/2000 10:02 AM

		 To: "'Stuart.Zisman@enron.com'" <Stuart.Zisman@enron.com>
		 cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>
		 Subject: First Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement

 <<2R6K02!.DOC>>  <<2R6KRED.DOC>>

Stuart:

We have enclosed for your review the initial draft of the First Amended and
Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of CA Energy Development I,
LLC.  Also enclosed is a redlined draft marked to reflect revisions from the
Power Generation Investco LLC transaction.

We anticipate forwarding to you shortly a draft of the proposed letter
agreement.  In the meantime, if you have any questions or comments regarding
the enclosed, or if we may be of any further assistance, please do not
hesitate to call.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 128540v2
  128540vR

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2R6K02!.DOC
 - 2R6KRED.DOC


California,s power crisis has generated heated debate over the last several
months.  Unfortunately, this debate has generated more heat than light.  We
want you to know what the facts are and what we are doing about the crisis.
Please spend a few minutes reading the following overview on the situation
and our position on California energy issues.

What happened in California

The source of California,s current problem is as straightforward as supply
and demand.  California,s economy grew 29 percent since 1998.  This increased
the demand for electricity by 24 percent.  At the same time, regulatory
restrictions prevented new generation from getting built in the state.  So
demand grew but regulations prevented supplies from being added.  The result,
predictably, is a shortage.  This summer, peak capacity will be about 10
percent shy of peak demand, leading to further blackouts in the state.

In addition to the supply and demand imbalance, there are two other related
factors that led to the current crisis.  First, the state,s regulations
forced all sales and purchases into the spot market.  The spot market for
power is extraordinarily volatile.  The way firms behave in a free market
when faced with such volatility is to construct a portfolio of purchases long
term, medium term and short term, to reduce exposure to this volatility.  In
California, state regulation prevented this strategy.  This would be the
equivalent of putting the entire state on an adjustable rate mortgage in the
most volatile interest rate environment imaginable.  Everything was fine
while the power surplus persisted, but when shortages ensued, every megawatt
was purchased at the sky rocketing spot price.

Second, retail markets were not deregulated.  Regulated retail rates remained
in effect, and stranded cost recovery charges were structured to keep
competition out.  This meant that utilities were forced to pay high wholesale
prices in the spot market but were only able to recover costs at the
regulated retail rate.  They are now nearly bankrupt.

In short, California,s problems were caused by regulation, not deregulation.
Regulations prevented competitors from entering the market, prevented new
generation from being built, and prevented prudent hedging against volatile
spot prices.

At the time California was developing its restructuring plan, Enron warned
the state,s policy makers about these risks and proposed alternatives, which,
if adopted, would have averted the current crisis.

Enron,s Role

Many political leaders in the state have elected to fix blame rather than fix
the problem.  Power sellers, including Enron, have been vilified by the
politicians and the media.  Here are the facts:

? Other than a small amount of wind power, Enron is not a generator in the
state of California.  Every megawatt we sold in California we bought in the
same market available to other California purchasers.  Because we are a
market maker, not a generator, we are not biased toward high prices.  We are
interested only in having a market that works so that we can package products
for our customers.
? As a seller to end-use markets in the state, we provided protection from
the problems the states, utilities, and their customers, now face.  We
protected, and still protect, our customers from price volatility.

You may have read that EES recently elected to have the utilities supply
power directly to its customers in California instead of procuring power on
the open market.  Early reports mischaracterized this as a &turnback8 of our
customers to the utilities.  Here are the facts:

? As a result of a variety of factors existing in the current California
market, it made more sense for EES to source power for its customers directly
from the utilities.  This decision reduced EES,s market price risk by
allowing EES to access lower utility rates.
? EES did not terminate any customer contracts, and our customers continue to
receive the financial benefits of their contract prices.
? EES is continuing to work with its California customers to provide them
with other energy-related products and services, including assistance in
reducing the demand for power, particularly at peak times.

Enron is currently proposing solutions to help California work out of its
crisis; Enron continues to sign up customers in the state; and Enron
continues to actively manage its risks and capture opportunities in Western
power markets.  Enron,s primary business is managing risk for our customers
with solutions customized to meet their needs.  There has never been more
demand for our products and services.

The Solution

The solution to California,s crisis is also straightforward.  In summary, the
state must increase supply, reduce demand, reduce reliance on the spot market
and shore up the financial stability of the state,s utilities.

Increasing Supply

California,s process for siting and permitting new generation is nothing
short of Byzantine.  Enron has built plants elsewhere in the country in less
than a year.  In California, it often takes 5 to 7 years.  California simply
must streamline this process.  Ironically, while many of the regulations
generators must overcome are aimed at improving environmental quality, the
regulations are preventing new clean technology from coming online and
displacing current plants, which emit 40 times as much NOx.  California can
have abundant power and cleaner air by expediting the permitting of new
facilities.

Reducing Demand

Customers in California today have no incentive to reduce or shift demand.
They pay the same rate no matter what the market price is.  An open retail
market would trigger demand responses, which would balance supply and demand
at lower prices than today.  California should fully open its retail market.

Reducing Reliance on the Spot Market

In a truly deregulated market, customers would protect themselves from
volatile spot prices by purchasing some of their requirements on a longer
term, fixed-price basis.  The state has instead left procurement in the hands
of the utilities, which it has forced to buy exclusively in the spot market.
Opening the market at the retail level will give customers control over their
price risk.

Restoring the Financial Integrity of the State,s Institutions

The utilities in California are not paying their bills.  This has led to
greater uncertainty in the market, higher costs, and reduced flexibility to
arrive at lasting solutions.  California must permit its utilities to recover
their costs so they can pay their bills and invest in the transmission and
distribution assets necessary to get power from where it is to where it is
needed.

Just as important as doing these things, the state must avoid policies that,
while politically attractive, do not fix the problem or even make matters
worse.  Price caps have been proposed.  They don,t work; have never worked;
and they will not work here.  Price caps succeed only in creating shortages,
which then have to be allocated among competing users.  Imagine how
ineffectively the government would be in determining, for example, whether it
is better to make its limited power supplies available to the Imperial Valley
or Silicon Valley.  Price caps are a surefire way to make the current
shortage worse.

The state has also proposed to take over generation and transmission in
California.  There is no reason to believe, and every reason to doubt, that
the state will be more effective than free markets at investing in,
constructing, operating and maintaining assets.  This will also result in
California tax revenues being spent on power transmission and power
generation -- which the private sector can do -- instead of education, roads
and other public goods -- which the private sector cannot do.

As you are approached by people outside the company or are learning about the
crisis from the media, it,s important for you to know this:  We at Enron will
continue to serve our customers and we will continue to propose real
solutions to the state.


FYI.  From yesterday's editorial page in the WSJ. McFadden's one of the folks
that signed the "manifesto."

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 09:02 AM -----

	Elizabeth Linnell
	02/14/2001 08:17 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: WSJ

California Needs Deregulation Done Right
By Daniel McFadden

02/13/2001
The Wall Street Journal
A26
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

The electricity market in California has swung over its history from
monopolization by industrialists in its early days to comprehensive
regulation, then to partial deregulation in the 1990s, and now back toward
substantial regulation and government intervention. In the past, each swing
of the pendulum came from public frustration with the way this market
operated, and each produced a result that the public again found
unsatisfactory.
But the memory of politicians and the public is short. The state is poised to
repeat the mistakes of the last cycle of regulation. Measures passed by the
California Legislature this month are an ill-conceived intervention that will
lock the state into high energy costs and put it at a competitive
disadvantage for years to come.
Unless there is further action, the state will maintain subsidized retail
prices that discourage conservation, while capping in-state wholesale prices
in a manner that discourages construction of new in-state generation capacity
and leaves Californians at the mercy of out-of-state generators. Government
subsidization of electricity consumption will drain tax revenues that might
be better used for education and other needs, encumber California's children
with debt to pay the state's energy bills, and threaten the state's future
ability to sell bonds for public projects. The immediate political cost of
consumer outrage from higher electricity rates may be postponed, but the real
economic cost promises to be massive.
The sad thing is that this is all unnecessary.
The source of the crisis was rigid regulation of retail prices in the face of
rapid increases in wholesale prices driven by increased fuel prices and
increased demand in the national electricity market. The only effective
solution to the crisis is to make retail price regulation more flexible, so
that consumers see the real economic cost of electricity and respond to high
prices through conservation efforts that reduce demand and push prices down.
On the supply side, the state should encourage construction of new in-state
generation capacity through the right market signals, giving producers the
opportunity to site plants and sell power under conditions comparable to
other states.
It's true that state action was needed to stabilize the electricity market,
avoid immediate bankruptcy of the distribution companies, and assure
continued delivery of energy. But this step will only postpone the day of
reckoning unless sensible electricity pricing is introduced as well.
To limit the impact of high prices on the poor, increasing block-rate tariffs
can be used in which the rates for "lifeline" electricity use are kept low.
These were effective in limiting demand for water during California's last
drought, and are already used to promote energy conservation. A more
aggressive version that pushes the rates in high-usage blocks to the real
load-linked economic cost of electricity would provide an incentive that
would stimulate conservation at the precise points that will do the most to
moderate demand and push down wholesale prices.
Consumers should have the opportunity to hedge against price spikes and
average their payments to ease the pain of price volatility. The installation
of load-sensitive meters should be accelerated so that consumers can respond
to the economic price of the electricity they are consuming. This is new
technology for U.S. utilities, but has operated well in France for years.
On the supply side, the state and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
could use their regulatory power to require that existing generators redirect
excess profits to finance lifeline rates for retail customers and work off
the hangover from previous electricity purchased and not paid for.
However, care should be taken in dealing with generators to assure that every
kilowatt hour that any generation facility can produce at less than the
national wholesale price of electricity is in fact delivered to the market.
The state needs to be very cautious about getting into the power business as
an intermediary between generators and distributors. Government bureaucracies
rarely show dexterity in dealing with private suppliers, and access to
general government revenues dulls their incentive to operate efficiently.
Negotiating long-term contracts right now, when California is in a weak
market position and the out-of-state generators are in the driver's seat, is
likely to put the state at a future competitive disadvantage.
Consumers need to be reminded that money passed through the government to
subsidize electricity comes out of their pockets just as surely as price
increases, without the mitigating benefits of demand reduction.The lessons of
history suggest that in making the Hobson's choice between a dysfunctional
partially deregulated market and a fully-regulated one that promises to be
even more dysfunctional, California is picking the greater of the two evils.
If it fails to move to sensible electricity pricing in which both consumers
and suppliers see the real economic price at the margin, it will face
another, even more serious crisis in the not too distant future.
---
Mr. McFadden, a professor of economics at the University of California,
Berkeley, received the Nobel Prize in Economics last year.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Tracy and Michael,

Here's the revised budget.  Michael, please assess the timing of capital draw downs (eg, quarterly spends) against the IBIT target to make sure we have synchronized estimates.  I assume that capital drawn down during Q1 would require 4/4ths of IBIT requirement, Q2 would require 3/4ths of IBIT requirement, etc.  The current numbers indicate all capital would be drawn down in Q1, which is not the case.


Hello Mark,

Justin Boyd told me that your can help me with questions regarding Chile.
We got a request for guest access through MG.
The company is called Escondida and is a subsidiary of BHP Australia.

Please advise if I can set up a guest account or not.
F.Y.I.: MG is planning to put a "in w/h Chile" contract for Copper on-line as
soon as Enron has done the due diligence for this country.
Thanks !

Best regards

Diana Seifert
EOL PCG


Set up with Ana Alcantara  X3-5737 - 3/16/00. jar


Mary,

Please get with some one in measurement to check the flows at the meter.  I
am thinking that the measurement must be incorrect. In POPS, the estimates vs
acutals look odd.  The gas that was coming to us in June, is going to Koch in
July, so we should not be receiving anything.

D

Mary Poorman@ENRON
07/27/2000 08:45 AM
To: Danny Conner/NA/Enron@Enron, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Extend Deal

I have flow at meter 989602 for July without a deal to allocate to.   For
June production, deal number 276494 was at the meter.  Please either extend
the deal or create a ticket.  If you have any questions, please call me at
ext. 35251.

Thank you,

Mary Jane


FERC Restructures California Power Market

Responding to a California power market gone haywire and teetering on the
brink of operational and financial disaster, FERC Friday issued a series of
remedial measures, virtually stripping the Cal-PX and Cal-ISO of their
control of the market and calling market stakeholders together to negotiate
bilateral forward contracts.

The Commission's main action, effective with the issuance of the order after
the Friday afternoon meeting, removes the requirement that California
utilities buy and sell exclusively through the California Power Exchange
(Cal-PX) and clears the way for bi-lateral contracts in the forward market.
FERC scheduled a settlement conference for Dec. 19 in Washington of parties
in the state's power market to negotiate those contracts.

"California does [not] have the benefit of a competitive market," Chairman
James Hoecker said, noting he had heard the state's power market called
"crisis by design." The design was "an unworkable state law, the product of
command and control that described in detail" exactly how the market should
function. "It wasn't competition," Hoecker said. "It's time to get serious
about saving the future of competitive markets...Competition did not fail in
principle at either the wholesale or retail level because it was never
well-conceived or tried. This version of competition was a disaster."

Commissioner William Massey defended the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission's backing away from price caps. "Rather than cap the spot market
created by the state of California, the order would simply shrink its size
and diminish its influence." This will "give back participants' ability to
find the right price; This ability is what California has taken away from
that market."

Massey said the action would allow bilateral transactions, support forward
contracts, and allow the parties to manage risk. He urged the California
Public Utilities Commission to "step up to its responsibilities" in
supporting the FERC-directed activities.

Massey said the transfer of wealth in what he described as the "apocalypse"
in California "is absolutely staggering. The two largest utilities are
virtually bankrupt." He predicted a court, acting on accepted law and
precedent, would eventually rule the utilities are entitled to recover the
costs from customers, spreading the costs out over the entire state.

PG&E Corp. officials lambasted the Commission's actions, saying they left
California's electric customers "exposed to price gouging and future electric
supply reliability uncertainty."

"The California wholesale market is broken. And we are extremely disappointed
by the insufficiency of today's FERC order," PG&E officials said in a
statement. "The remedies outlined in the order do not go nearly far enough to
provide a solution that ensures reliability of the state's electric supply
and equally importantly, provides relief from future price gouging," the
Northern California utility company said. PG&E said it was particularly
disappointed that FERC did not call for retroactive price refunds for
California electric customers, as was requested by Gov. Gray Davis. The
utility also said it was "especially troubled" that FERC shortened the
timeframe for the electric price cap from the end of 2002 to April 2001,
"leaving customers exposed during the high-demand summer season."

Sen Dianne Feinstein, (D-CA), said FERC's action was unacceptable. "Rome is
burning, our utilities are close to bankruptcy, Californians are facing major
blackouts, and the Commission is fiddling."

Hoecker said similar competitive problems in states in the Pacific Northwest
have led to pleas from governors and others for regional price caps. But he
pointed to the fact that FERC is severely limited in what it can do in that
region. For one, it lacks authority over the Bonneville Power Authority and
other federal operations there, which make up a major portion of the market.
Further, there is no Northwest spot market that can be capped in the way caps
operate in California. There also would be problems with the many purchasers
who already had hedged or protected themselves in some way. Hoecker strongly
urged Energy Secretary Bill Richardson to convene a conference to try to
identify regional problems, and offered his help in this.

Commissioners Curt Hebert and Massey said they would issue concurring
opinions. Hoecker said he will submit a concurring opinion next week on items
such as RTOs that are beyond the scope of the order. The Commission's
actions, which went beyond recommendations it had made earlier (see Daily
GPI, Nov. 2), came at an emergency meeting following a week of continuous
power alerts and emergency measures to avoid rolling blackouts in the state.

The Commission's reforms call for:

 No retroactive refunds for California customers;

 Elimination of the requirement that California's three investor-owned
utilities --- Pacific Gas and Electric, San Diego Gas and Electric and
Southern California Edison --- sell all of their power into the Cal-PX, and
buy all of their power from the Cal-PX. This took effect Friday;

 Return 25,000 MW of generation to state regulation;

 Termination of the Cal-PX wholesale rate schedule effective the close of the
trading day on April 30, 2001;

 Create a benchmark price for wholesale bilateral contracts to assess prices
of five-year energy supply contracts;

 Create penalties for underscheduling power loads;

 A requirement that market participants schedule 95% of their load prior to
real time. Violators will incur penalties for scheduling deviations exceeding
the greater of 10 MW or 5% of their hourly load;

 Begin market monitoring and price mitigation for the Cal-ISO and PX spot
markets. FERC will hold a technical conference to develop a monitoring an
mitigation program. A proposed plan is to be submitted by March 1 so that the
measure can be in place by May 1;

 A single-priced auction to be used only for bids at or below $150/MW. Bids
above $150/MW will not set the market clearing price, although they will be
subject to FERC reporting requirements;

 Replacing the current Cal-ISO stakeholder governing board with a
non-stakeholder board. On Jan. 29, 2001, the Cal-ISO governing board members
will be required to turn over their decision-making power and operating
control to the management of the Cal-ISO. The members will be permitted to
function in an advisory capacity until the new board is selected. FERC to
discuss with California representatives a process for selecting new Cal-ISO
board members; and

 Modify interconnection procedures. The ISO and utilities must file
generation interconnection procedures.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001
04:33 PM ---------------------------

Jona Kimbrough@ENRON
05/02/2001 02:56 PM
To: Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron,
t.hermann@pecorp.com, Barbara G Dillard/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cary M
Carrabine/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve Richman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Tomaski/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron@Enron, Russell E
Murrell/Corp/Enron@Enron, Roy Rodriguez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Fascetti/Corp/Enron@Enron, t.compton@pecorp.com, a.akkerman@pecorp.com,
R.hayes@pecorp.com, d.wear@pecorp.com, r.delara@pecorp.com,
M.ansari@pecorp.com, K.Staszak@pecorp.com, l.thomas@pecorp.com,
J.slechta@pecorp.com, w.morrow@pecorp.com, w.quigley@pecorp.com,
t.puracchio@pecorp.com, james.simpson@enron.com, robin.rodrigue@enron.com,
rfox@peprod.com, s.nance@peprod.com, hunter.shively@enron.com,
j.pappalardo@pecorp.com, t.patrick@pecorp.com, daryll.fuentes@enron.com,
darron.c.giron@enron.com, c.blachut@pecorp.com, Lisa Kinsey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Superty/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: Cubs Invitation


Hey, I forgot that she is running in New York. If those people elect her are
you sure you wouldn't mind leaving there!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 9:33 AM
To: emmye@dracospring.com
Subject: Re: FW: FW: (no subject)

That's a good one.  This is taking on much more meaning now that she
possibly might be a US Senator.  Yikes.

                    "Emmye"
                    <emmye@dracos        To:     <gerald.nemec@enron.com>
                    pring.com>           cc:
                                         Subject:     FW: FW: (no subject)
                    09/14/2000
                    08:47 AM

-----Original Message-----
From: JDogg96137@aol.com [mailto:JDogg96137@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 4:51 PM
To: JWells4378@aol.com; lkitchel@duffkitchelcpa.com;
lnkitchel@hotmail.com; jculwell@lcc.net; patti@dellago.com;
Charles.Johnson@equistarchem.com; ginabjohnson@compuserve.com;
jkitchel@bechtel.com; ldeniso@azurix.com; DDaniel@gbltx.com;
casares@astros.com; MEasley986@aol.com; iii@neosoft.com;
jabell@akingump.com; nextstep@bga.com; lenory@hotmail.com;
KacherSA@aol.com; jbolen@mdgibson.com; bethtx@webtv.net;
KWatkins@encompserv.com; Sandra.Shook@bakeroiltools.com;
zabalaj@hotmail.com; cindi.tate@unisys.com; jason@austinfirst.com;
joseph_h_hall@yahoo.com; Diane.Mullins@bowne.com; andy@dot9.com;
Cindyespinoza@aol.com; TROYNICHOLAS@aol.com; Cskbl1@aol.com;
dscurcio@worldnet.att.net; dgtatem@ev1.net; EJNicholas@msn.com;
dfornfeist@swmail.sw.org; bittenbinder@tamu.edu; emmye@dracospring.com
Subject: Fwd: FW: (no subject)

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Robertson, Misty" <MRoberts@bindview.com>
To: "'AL'" <ALW@GLD-LAW.com>, "'CLAUDIA'" <cblackman@gseworld.com>,
"'DWANE'" <Dwane.Harrison@Halliburton.com>,   "'JEFF'"
<JDogg96137@aol.com>,    "'JOSH'" <JWeinste@enron.com>,      "'KIM'"
<KimJ@GLD-LAW.com>, "'MELISA'" <melisa_4@yahoo.com>,    "'MELODY'"
<gillespie@camdenprop.com>,   "'MICHELLE'" <mrobertson@computertech.com>,
"'PAT D'" <pduff@gseworld.com>,    "'TERESA'" <TTrull@gseworld.com>,
"'TIM'" <tbrandt@wt.net>,     "'TODD'" <tbarnes65@mindspring.com>
Subject: FW: (no subject)
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 09:58:08 -0500
Message-ID: <82D9E4BB02AED311855D0008C756FEBD02EA147A@BVEW>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;     charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200

Misty Robertson
BindView Corporation
Budget Coordinator/Analyst
713.561.4204

               OVER THE HILLARY
                            * * *
submitted by The Captain

Hillary Clinton and her driver were cruising along a country road one
evening
when a cow ran in front of the car.

The driver tried to avoid it but couldn't - the cow was killed.

Hillary told her driver to go up to the farmhouse and explain to the owners
what happened.

About an hour later, the driver staggered back to the car with his clothes
in
disarray.  He was holding a bottle of wine in one hand, a cigar in the
other

and smiling happily.

"What happened?" asked Hillary.

"Well," the driver replied, "the farmer gave me the wine, his wife gave me
the
cigar, and their beautiful daughter made mad passionate love to me."

"My God, what did you tell them?" asked Hillary.

The driver replied: "I'm Hillary Clinton's driver, and I just killed the
cow."


Yeah I will play.  Who else is playing?


A man with a black eye, boards a plane bound for Pittsburgh and sits
down.
He immediately notices that the man next to him also has a black eye
and
says, "Hey this is a coincidence, we both have black eyes; mind if I
ask
how you got yours?"

The other guy replies, "Well, it was a tongue twister accident.  I was
at
the ticket counter and this gorgeous blonde with the most beautiful
large
breasts was there. So, instead of saying, 'I'd like two tickets to
Pittsburgh,' I accidentally said, 'I'd like two pickets to
Tittsburgh.'...and she socked me a good one."

The first guy replied, "Wow! This is unbelievable. Mine was a tongue
twister
too. I was at the breakfast table and I wanted to say to my wife,
'Please
pour me a cup of coffee honey.' But I accidentally said, 'You have
ruined my

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Jason (Trading)
Sent:	Friday, June  1, 2001 8:56 AM
To:	Schrab, Mark L.; Dempsey, Wes; Lenart, Kirk; Espey, Darren
Subject:	FW: Red-Neck Horseshoes

Looks like Darren's Family reunion!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blaine, Jay
Sent:	Friday, June 01, 2001 8:43 AM
To:	Homco, Jim; Knoblauh, Jay; Williams, Jason (Trading)
Subject:	FW: Red-Neck Horseshoes

 - Red-Neck Horse Shoes.jpg << File: Red-Neck Horse Shoes.jpg >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000 03:42 PM
---------------------------

Jeanna Smith <jeannas@senterracorp.com> on 09/19/2000 01:40:56 PM
To: "'ddavis@enron.com'" <ddavis@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: www.DefensiveDriver.com Course Payment

Dear Jeanne,

We have processed your payment and you may now log on to
www.DefensiveDriver.com and begin taking the course.  You will need to print
this e-mail and keep by your computer while taking the course.  We will ask
you security questions regarding your payment throughout the course to
validate your identity.  You will need to enter the information below to
answer these questions correctly.  If you have any questions or problems,
please contact me at (888) 547-9272.

Check Number:

15044852091900111111

Expiration Date:

10/00

Billing Address:

2110 Union Mill Rd
Houston, TX 77067

Thanks for choosing DefensiveDriver.com!

Sincerely,
Jeanna Smith
Customer Service Analyst
www.DefensiveDriver.com


Please print Wellesley schedule - I think that I have a conflict with the
date that they need me.  Let's discuss.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001 03:16 PM
---------------------------

Geynille Dillingham
02/02/2001 05:53 PM
To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Mariella
Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly H Boots/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Goldman/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Mog Heu/NA/Enron@Enron, Sabina Rank/NA/Enron@Enron, Grace
Kim/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Schneider/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Bryan Garrett/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kim
Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Carol Jean Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Shim/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kathy McMahon/NA/Enron@Enron, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Isabel
Romero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Wellesley Revised Strategy

Hello Team!!!

Due to scheduling conflicts the strategy has been adjusted.  Please review
the strategy for the changes and adjust your schedules accordingly.  If you
have problems or concerns, please feel free to contact me.

I will be out of the office until the 16th but will be checking e-mail and
voice mail.

Thanks,

Geynille Dillingham
Recruiter
3-1546

Corina Taylor
Recruiting Coordinator
5-7344


please track this down
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 09:14 AM -----

	Carol Essig/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/09/2001 02:39 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Newell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, MACK
SHIVELY/ENRON@enronxgate, Robin Hill/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Nancy Muchmore/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Black/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Robert Eickenroht/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: Enron Corp. Annual PUHCA Filing - Request for Information

The previously sent request may be an oversight, or you may be busy  with
other things, but because we have a deadline for the PUHCA filing with the
SEC, we are sending a reminder to you that we would like to have the
information for your respective areas as soon as possible.  Please refer to
the memo from Robert Eickenroht dated March 29, 2001.

If you should have any questions, please contact Robert at 713-853-3155 or
myself at 713-853-7014. We appreciate your help on this project.

Carol Essig
Enron Corp. Legal
EB 4854
Fax: 713-646-5847
Ph:   713-853-7014


You have received this email because you are listed as a data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000038420&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000038420
Request Create Date : 6/4/01 7:52:05 AM
Requested For       : gary.bryan@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US NatGas NatGas Book to Book (Trader Access - Website)
Resource Type       : Applications


I believe this email was intended for you.

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 01:14
PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 10/24/2000 12:52 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Gas Accord II Rule 51

FYI.  For meeting with PG&E (which is Tues., Oct. 31, from 10 am-Noon (PDT)
in Enron's SF offices.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/24/2000 12:50 PM -----

	"Bellenger, Geoffrey" <GJB2@pge.com>
	10/23/2000 06:42 PM

		 To: "'jdasovic@enron.com'" <jdasovic@enron.com>
		 cc: "Williams, Ray" <RDW0@pge.com>, "Lindh, Frank (Law)" <FRL3@pge.com>
		 Subject: Gas Accord II Rule 51

Jeff

Ray Williams relayed to me that you would like to sign the Rule 51 agreement
so you can get our prior Workshop materials.  All you need to do is fill out
the information form, initial (electronically) on the appropriate line, and
e-mail back to me (gjb2@pge.com).
 <<Gas Accord II Information Form.doc>>

Here is a copy of Rule 51.  Nothing needed on this document.  It is only for
your reference.
 <<CPUC Rule 51.doc>>
Call if you have questions.
 Geoff
 415-973-8415

 - Gas Accord II Information Form.doc
 - CPUC Rule 51.doc