Isabel,

I'm waiting on Delta to give me language concerning a performance guarantee
adjustment for site conditions before turning the execution version.

The GE parent guaranty and LOC are in the all the earlier versions I sent,
and remain unchanged.  Please let me know if you don't have the earlier
versions.

Kay

"PARKER, Isabel" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com> on 04/18/2001 06:07:33 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "O'BRIEN, Lisa" <lisa.obrien@freshfields.com>

Subject: RE: Revised language relating to payment

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.  Thank you for
your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

Kay
Do you know when we might receive a revised Turbine Contract?  The lenders
would like to review the GE parent guarantee.
Thank you
Isabel

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 11:11 AM
To: rvicens@deltapower.com; gregorylang@paulhastings.com;
iparker@freshfields.com
Cc: Stephen.Thome@enron.com; Jake.Thomas@enron.com; ccampbell@kslaw.com;
jkeffer@kslaw.com
Subject: Revised language relating to payment

The following language/numbers are acceptable to GE:

6.1.2     Payment Schedule.
|-----------------+-----------------|
|   Payment Date  |  Payment Amount |
|-----------------+-----------------|
| April 30, 2001  |$50,234,000      |
|-----------------+-----------------|
|                 |                 |
|-----------------+-----------------|
|                 |                 |
|-----------------+-----------------|
|            TOTAL| $50,234,000     |
|-----------------+-----------------|

Such April 30th payment shall constitute full and final payment for the
Units, except that Purchaser shall be responsible for the payment of any
and all amounts associated with any Change Order after the Effective Date.
The final payment is also subject to Section 6.1.3.

The form of the letter of credit is included as an exhibit to the turbine
contract (exhibit D) and the form of GE parent guarantee is attached as
Exhibit C-1.

Kay


----------------------------------------------------------------
Join us for Signature Interactive Events in October
----------------------------------------------------------------

Our Signature Interactive Events series continues to bring you
direct access to market and industry leaders with these exciting
events in October.

Please note the date and time of each event or get an e-mail
reminder by clicking here:
http://schwab2.m0.net/m/p/sss/s1.asp?e=JDASOVIC@enron.com

MarketPro Talk, Wednesday, October 11, 7:30 pm ET
----------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: "How Do You Find Value in Today's Market?",
with Peter Higgins, Portfolio Manager, Dreyfus Midcap Value Fund
and Greg Valliere, Chief Strategist, Schwab Washington Research Group.

The economy is strong, productivity levels are high, and as a
result the U.S. stock market has become expensive. Do values
still exist? How can you find great companies that
aren't overpriced?

Here's your chance to listen in and ask questions of a
professional investor, Peter Higgins, Portfolio Manager of
the Dreyfus Midcap Value Fund. He will talk about the stocks he's
following, the industry trends he's noticing, and what it means
to you as an investor.

Argus Roundtable, Wednesday, October 25, 7:00 pm ET
Watch it via streaming live video!
----------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Outlook for Technology Stocks

Technology continues to drive both the market and the economy.
But even within technology, investors must consider a myriad
of opportunities. During this live video Roundtable,
the Argus panel will focus on some of the highest-growth in
technology, including communications equipment, optical
networking, and Internet software.

CEO Speaker Series, Tuesday, October 31, 4:00 pm ET
----------------------------------------------------------------
Speaker: Craig Barrett, President and CEO, Intel Corporation

For three decades, Intel Corporation has developed technology
enabling the computer and Internet revolution that has changed
the world. Today, Intel supplies chips, boards, systems,
software, networking, communications equipment, and services
that compose the ingredients of computer architecture and
the Internet. Join Craig Barrett as he discusses the strategy
in making Intel the preeminent building block supplier to the
worldwide Internet economy.

Ask the experts
----------------------------------------------------------------
Log on using the link below for instructions on how to
participate in an event, or how to submit questions in advance.
If you miss an event, you can also access the Event Archive.
http://schwab2.m0.net/m/s.asp?H2238804517X871204

Other Online Events
----------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on other Schwab online events, click here:

http://schwab2.m0.net/m/s.asp?H2238804517X871209

Signature Interactive Event E-mails in HTML
---------------------------------------------------------------
Did you know you can choose the type of e-mail you receive from
Schwab? To change your preferences, or find out more, log on
using the link below:
http://schwab2.m0.net/m/s.asp?H2238804517X871205

---------------------------------------------------------------
This information should not be considered an individualized
recommendation. The securities mentioned may not be suitable
for everyone. Each investor needs to review a security
transaction for his or her own particular situation.

To change your e-mail address, click on the link below. Log on,
and you will be taken to the page that will allow you to update
your e-mail address securely. For your protection, we are unable
to accept instructions to change your e-mail address sent in
reply to this message.
http://schwab2.m0.net/m/s.asp?H2238804517X871207

We respect your privacy. Schwab will use the information you
provide to open and service your accounts, communicate with you
and provide information about products and services. Read about
Schwab's privacy policy at:
http://www.schwab.com/privacy

----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the Signature Events e-mails, click on
the link below. After logging in, go to the bottom of the
page, click on Unsubscribe, then click on Finish.
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=brdAlertSetup

Notice: All e-mail sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
e-mail system may be retained, monitored, and/or reviewed
by Schwab personnel.

(c)2000 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. All rights reserved. Member
SIPC/NYSE. CRS 12407 (0900-8042)


I'm so glad you wrote me back - sounds like you're a very busy person, but it
looks like you're getting to do what you wanted to do.  As for me, I got
married to a great guy named Patrick that i met during our last semester at
UT.  We actually got set up on a blind date by Rachel Hanson.  Anyway, we'll
be married 6 years in June and we're expecting our first child in June.  I
spent a few years after college as a clothing buyer for Foley's, but I now am
doing something completely different that I absolutely love.  I work for
Enron - big energy trading company - wasnt sure if you knew who we were.  I'm
trading natural gas, and it's a really fun job that's fast-paced and
challenging.  My hubby is an account manager for an internet company that has
not yet gone public but their prospects are looking pretty good.  We bought a
house in Sugarland about 3.5 years ago, but we sold it in August and moved
into a new house that we built in Katy.  We wanted to be close to my parents
and also closer to San Antonio - where Pat is from - his parents still live
there.  Anyway - I guess that's it in a nutshell.  Oh yeah - and my address
is:
4419 Stackstone Ln.
Katy, TX 77450
I hope we can keep in touch.  I'm not travelling right now, but if you ever
make it to Houston - I'd love to see you.  Give me some more details in the
next email!
Take Care and Happy Holidays!

Love,
Tori


Attached please find a proposal by John Morris to prepare an economic
analysis of pipeline affiliate concentration into specific geographic
destination markets vis-a-vis non-affiliates.? I would like to discuss this
proposal with our group on Thursday afternoon (2:00 est).? I will forward on
call-in instructions tomorrow.? Please be aware that this proposal is
privileged and confidential and was prepared as attorney-client work
product.?? Mr. Morris' information is set forth below.? It may be valuable to
ask Mr. Morris to join us for the conference call in order to answer your
questions.

-
John R. Morris
Vice President
Economists Incorporated
1200 New Hampshire Avenue, NW
Suite 400
Washington, DC? 20036
Voice: 202.223.4700
Fax:?? 202.296.7138

?
 - INGAA Proposal.doc
 - ATT00512.txt


This paper will be filed at FERC tomorrow.  Here's a copy for you file.  Ron
will send us the final version of the cover motion tomorrow.

 - 00-10-19 SA Enron White Paper - Final.doc


Hey J-

What's up?  Any contests with the traders today?

Does anyone there need an assistant?  Kevin (Matt's room mate) is looking
for summer employment.

Not much else going on.

Tamara


Shall we buy this?

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/30/2001 09:44 AM -----

	"Dan Douglass" <douglass@energyattorney.com>
	07/30/2001 08:38 AM

		 To: "Sue Mara" <susan.j.mara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fw: Enron's Secrets Revealed

Sue, the attached was somehow sent to me....thoiught you might enjoy it!

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Global Change Associates" <pfusaro@nirvanasoft.com>
To: <edasilv@enron.com>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 9:13 PM
Subject: Enron's Secrets Revealed

How has Enron managed to achieve such success while other energy firms have
struggled to deal with the changing market landscape?

Global Change Associates is pleased to announce the publication of a new
corporate profile entitled, "Enron 2001: An Inside View".  This objective
study takes an insider's look at Enron, specifically, how the firm operates
and the keys to its success. Much of the information provided comes from
first hand accounts and covers areas such as:

? The firm's structure and operations
? The recruitment and training of new employees
? How Enron empowers and compensates its employees
? The keys to structuring Enron type "risk free" transactions
? How to negotiate with Enron
? Why Enron occasionally forgives counterparty obligations
? Is the Enron model right for your organization?

Enron 2001: An Inside View is a unique publication. It provides valuable
insight into the firm's operations and analyzes its successes and failures.
For those firms dealing directly with Enron, or thinking about adopting some
of Enron's business practices, it is an invaluable, must have tool.

This innovative study is available for purchase at $995.00.

For a detailed Table of Contents please open the attached file,
Enron2001TOC. To order please go to www.global-change.com, click on
"Reports" or complete the attached order form and fax to 212-625-8810.

For more information on this product please contact Alan M. Herbst at
212-625-1711 or via email at info@global-change.com.

To be removed from this distribution list, please reply with the word REMOVE
in the subject line.

 - Enron 2001TOC.pdf
 - Enron2001Order.pdf


?
-----Original Message-----
From: Wong, John S.  [mailto:jsw@cpuc.ca.gov]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 3:00  PM
To: 'skatz@sempratrading.com'; 'kmccrea@sablaw.com';
'thompson@wrightlaw.com'; 'johnj@bcjlaw.com'; 'sscott3@enron.com';
'trdill@westernhubs.com'; 'ghinners@reliantenergy.com';
'tdickers@westerngas.com'; 'mark.c.moench@wgp.twc.com';
'andy.bettwy@swgas.com';  'johnwalley@swgas.com'; 'napedersen@jonesday.com';
'rpetti@ladwp.com';  'eklinkner@ci.pasadena.ca.us';
'slins@ci.glendale.ca.us';  'bjeider@ci.burbank.ca.us';
'roger.pelote@williams.com'; 'porterdk@sce.com';  'inggm@sce.com';
'burkee@cts.com'; 'jleslie@luce.com'; 'gsullivan@sempra.com';
'jsteffen@iid.com'; 'haorndorff@aeraenergy.com'; 'kbhensman@aeraenergy.com';
'grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us'; 'mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com';
'marcel@turn.org'; Farrar, Darwin; McNamara, Michael D.; Gileau, Patrick L.;
'joseh@lif.org'; 'joseh@lif.org'; 'evk1@pge.com'; 'epoole@adplaw.com';
'bcragg@gmssr.com'; 'chj@aelaw.com'; 'chilen@llgm.com'; 'eke@aelaw.com';
'jmct@gmssr.com'; 'jkarp@whitecase.com'; 'lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com';
'rick.counihan@greenmountain.com'; 'mday@gmssr.com'; 'edwardoneill@dwt.com';
'raveen_maan@cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us'; 'rochmanm@cubjpa.org';
'jcattermole@pcenergy.com'; 'igsinc@ix.netcom.com'; 'craigc@calpine.com';
'gtbl@dynegy.com'; 'joe.paul@dynegy.com'; 'kfyip@seiworldwide.com';
'davef@abag.ca.gov'; 'garyb@abag.ca.gov'; 'ceyap@earthlink.net';
'askaff@energy-law-group.com'; 'pjpowerlaw@aol.com';
'tomb@crossborderenergy.com'; 'jweil@aglet.org'; 'dcarroll@dbsr.com';
'ed@clfp.com'; 'gtbl@dynegy.com'; 'iep@iepa.com'; 'lmh@eslawfirm.com';
'jtachera@energy.state.ca.us'; 'kmills@cfbf.com'; 'ron_oechsler@rmiinc.com';
'alan_reid@pcp.ca'; 'rfoss@coral-energy.com'; 'tom.roth@et.pge.com';
'ronknecht@aol.com'; 'furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil'; 'aod@newsdata.com';
'rgloistein@orrick.com'; 'salleyoo@dwt.com'; 'igsinc@ix.netcom.com';
'rbw@mrwassoc.com'; 'chris.king@utility.com'; 'rczahar@aol.com';
'stomashe@energy.state.ca.us'; 'karen@klindh.com'; Stevens, Maria E.;
'jwr@cpuc.ca.gov'; Quan, Edwin; Wong, John S.; Myers, Richard A.; Pocta,
Robert  M.; White, Rosalina; Sarvate, Sarita; Horner, Trina; Beck, Valerie;
'mjaske@energy.state.ca.us'; 'bwood@energy.state.ca.us';
'jbushee@sablaw.com';  'rogerberliner@bcjlaw.com'; 'rcsstl@cdmnet.com';
'mbrubaker@consultbai.com';  'anchau@shellus.com';
'keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com';  'jsmollon@newwestenergy.com';
'jlyoung@sempra.com'; 'athomas@newenergy.com';  'fchristi@arterhadden.com';
'kmcspadd@milbank.com'; 'hchoy@isd.co.la.ca.us';  'lgurick@calpx.com';
'douglass@arterhadden.com'; 'randy_britt@mayco.com';  'frank.cooley@sce.com';
'glwaas@calpx.com'; 'uwua@worker.com';  'fmo@sdcity.sannet.gov';
'jleslie@luce.com'; 'julesan@aol.com';  'mshames@ucan.org';
'jparrott@sempra.com'; 'kmelville@sempra.com';
'bill.mccallum@ci.fresno.ca.us'; 'btenney@landuselaw.com';
'ronknecht@aol.com';  'rcosta@turn.org'; 'bfinkelstein@turn.org';
'theresa_mueller@ci.sf.ca.us';  Zeller, Jason; 'chrisw@greenlining.org';
'joseh@lif.org'; 'jnnc@chevron.com';  'jlondon@gralegal.com';
'imoosen@gralegal.com'; 'phanschen@mofo.com';  'epoole@adplaw.com';
'rschmidt@bartlewells.com'; 'chilen@llgm.com';  'lys@aelaw.com';
'jsqueri@gmssr.com'; 'jbennett@gmssr.com';  'bloomje@la.whitecase.com';
'pbray@newpower.com'; 'thoulihan@mdbe.com';  'jmalkin@orrick.com';
'smoss@hooked.net'; 'mrh2@pge.com'; 'whe1@pge.com';
'ssmyers@worldnet.att.net'; 'pat.williams@dhcmail.com';
'wbooth@booth-law.com';  'jerryl@abag.ca.gov'; 'mgomez1@bart.gov';
'askaff@energy-law-group.com';  'hf@energy-law-group.com';
'pjpowerlaw@aol.com';  'difellman@energy-law-group.com';
'nryan@environmentaldefense.org';  'psly@ebmud.com'; 'rrcollins@n-h-i.org';
'patrickm@crossborderenergy.com';  'brbarkovich@earthlink.net';
'pjmuller@ricochet.net'; 'pmcdonne@wenet.net';  'berry@apx.com';
'sberlin@mccarthylaw.com'; 'scottst@mid.org';  'cmkehrein@ems-ca.com';
'abb@eslawfirm.com'; 'bpowers@seniors.org';  'dcarroll@dbsr.com';
'dkk@eslawfirm.com'; 'ed@clfp.com'; 'howens@seniors.org';
'sgreenberg@realenergy.com'; 'smutny@iepa.com'; 'lmh@eslawfirm.com';
'jtachera@energy.state.ca.us'; 'hodgesjl@pacbell.net';
'rpernell@energy.state.ca.us'; 'kmills@cfbf.com'; 'rliebert@cfbf.com';
'aorchard@smud.org'; 'mpa@aelaw.com'; 'jcpaine@stoel.com';
'mhg@hetrading.com';  'dws@keywaycorp.com'; 'hbd@gweiss.com';
'gerhordt.herbert@msdw.com';  'cread@steptoe.com'; 'jogg@jhenergy.com';
'peter_fox-penner@brattle.com';  'sdefrawi@efaches.navfac.navy.mil';
'ad046@detroit.freenet.org';  'bob_anderson@apses.com'; 'gdreed@sidley.com';
'robert.d.schasel@fritolay.com';  'georgeperrault@msn.com'; 'foxba@sce.com';
'picketse@sce.com';  'jsilva@edisonenterprises.com';
'LVanWagenen@sempra.com';  'jbarthrop@powersavers.com'; 'foothill@lmi.net';
'kpoole@adamsbroadwell.com';  'fosterbc@sce.com'; 'ljhubbard@sempra.com';
'ktilton@gralegal.com';  'paul.harris@bridge.com'; 'oshirock@pacbell.net';
'natutt@duanemorris.com';  'j3m9@pge.com; 'cafield@pirg.org';
'derkp@newsdata.com'; 'luluw@newsdata.com';  'tom.oneill@abnamro.com';
'mmattes@nossaman.com'; 'RJP2@pge.com';  'ell5@pge.com'; 'jyf1@pge.com';
'NXK2@pge.com'; 'rrh3@pge.com';  'ConsumersFirst@worldnet.att.net';
'normkr@aol.com'; 'joe.paul@dynegy.com';  'honest@compuserve.com';
'jyoung@ebmud.com'; 'emitchel@angnewspapers.com';  'rbw@mrwassoc.com';
'dmarcus@slip.net'; 'jeff@hmhresources.com'; 'ed@apx.com';  'chrism@mid.org';
'fwmonier@tid.org'; 'rmccann@cal.net';  'blaising@braunlegal.com';
'melanie_gillette@rmiinc.com';  'twetzel@thermoecotek.com';
'Slayman@energy.state.ca.us'; 'jdh@eslawfirm.com';  'ddavie@hesinet.com';
'karen@klindh.com'; 'cpeyton@sacbee.com';  'thaines@smud.org';
'huse@eesconsulting.com'; Stevens, Maria E.; Minkin, Angela  K.; Walwyn,
Christine M.; Danforth, Christopher; Lafrenz, Donald J.; Fua,  Faline; Lo,
Jeanette; Kajopaiye, Kayode; Hattevik, Kerry; Malcolm, Kim;  Kinosian,
Robert; Feraru, Robert T.; White, Rosalina; Casey, Sean F.; Linsey,  Steve;
Tapawan-Conway, Zenaida G.; 'nevillm@hdcdojnet.state.ca.us';
'dwrlegal1@water.ca.gov'; Hartmann, Audra; 'LKristov@energy.state.ca.us';
'randy.chinn@senate.ca.gov'; 'rtavares@energy.state.ca.us';
'mschwebs@energy.state.ca.us'
Subject: ALJ Ruling Shortening Time To  Repond to ORA/TURN's Emergency Peti
tion to Modify  D.97-08-055

Attached is an ALJ ruling shortening the time to  respond to the emergency
petition filed by ORA and TURN to modify D.97-08-055,  the decision approving
the Gas Accord for PG&E, and Resolution G-2388, the  resolution which
implemented the Gas Accord.? Interested parties have until  January 26, 2001
to file a response.

The service lists in I.99-07-003 and A.00-11-038 are  being used to
distribute this ruling by e-mail because no e-mail service lists  are
currently available for A.92-12-043 and the related proceedings.?  Copies are
being mailed to the service lists in A.92-12-043, A.94-06-044, and
A.96-08-043.

ALJ John S. Wong? <<WEBPUB-#4642-v1-_.doc>>

 - WEBPUB-#4642-v1-_.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
02:30 PM ---------------------------

Anita DuPont@ENRON
02/06/2001 02:17 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Year 2000 Presentations


Susan:
I don't know if you were able to call these counterparties today but please
follow up early next week with Coral, Dreyfus and Koch.  Thanks.
Carol

	Susan Flynn
	05/18/2000 04:43 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: CES

 Here is an updated chart.   I'll continue to work on this tomorrow.


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ARING>
To: 'Sandra.Brawner@enron.com'
Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:06:04 GMT
Subject:

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Winckowski, Michele
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:16 PM
Subject:	FW: Things to do when the boss is out.

 - cubicle hurdles.mpeg
 - Hallway races.mpeg
 - Rowing.mpeg


Oh, just a little teaser for the group.  Believe me, they all just think
it's me being my usual weird, nonsensical self.

Do you want the picture you sent me?

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:11 AM
To: Fenner, Chet
Subject: RE: RESULTS OF MAN NIGHT

thats enough, dont let the cat out of the bag. hey forward me that picture

-----Original Message-----
From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:07 AM
To: 'Erik Wollam'; bcorrier@cox-internet.com; knipe3@msn.com; Fenner,
Chet; c.r.zander@att.net; Parks, Joe; john.chambers@bisys.com;
brianc@saltgrass.com
Subject: RE: RESULTS OF MAN NIGHT

Just so all of you know, the "review" of last night is not over yet.  Just
wait...

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 10:59 AM
To: bcorrier@cox-internet.com; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com;
c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com;
brianc@saltgrass.com
Subject: RESULTS OF MAN NIGHT

Had fun. Glad to see everyone at the Hybrid man night. Reported to Zander,
who was glad to hear we enjoyed the food. Joe that was not a TV dinner.
We still need to take care of the deer lease food/beer issues. ....whenever.
FYI John (Wollam) is fine. Has a pulled muscle in his neck.
Enjoyed eating eyes, eye socket fatty tissue, head meat, talking about how
much I care for my dog, eating heart meat, men playing with their meat,
bowel distress and "grapes" and seeing how it played out for the one MAN
audience.
I doubt Dave Wieland will join us again and Ted will likely be asked to turn

down the next invitation to join us by his friend.
I give the food an A+, service was also excellent. Chad gets the award for
being most "in" to the effort.
I will mark my calendar for 60 days to rip a thread for the next effort. e.

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Randy:
As I mentioned in my voice mail to you, we have accepted the CSP language
with the October 2002 date and with my other modifications which Susan sent
to you yesterday.  With respect to the Guaranty, the last draft that I saw
had a termination date of June 30, 2001.  Just want to make sure taht
whatever is signed has a different termination date (i.e. June 30, 2002).
Again, before we release our Guaranty I would like to see the final version
of your Guaranty.  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


We understand that the recent cases of Anthrax contamination and the possibility that biological agents such as Anthrax may be used in a terrorist attack are raising great concerns among Enron employees.  Many government and commercial facilities in the United States have already received Anthrax threat letters containing powdery substances.  Most of these have, however, been determined to be false alarms.  We have no reason to believe that Enron has been or will be the target of an Anthrax attack, but we want to provide all employees with background information on Anthrax and up-to-date guidance for handling any possible Anthrax exposures.

If you have additional questions or concerns, please contact Corporate Security in Houston at (713) 345-2804 or via email at CorporateSecurity@enron.com.

The most important thing to remember is:  Do not panic.  To infect someone, the Anthrax organism must be rubbed into abraded skin, swallowed, or inhaled as a fine, aerosolized mist.  Infection can be prevented after exposure to Anthrax by early treatment with the appropriate antibiotics.  Anthrax cannot be spread from one person to another.

Following are guidelines for identifying and dealing with suspicious letters or packages:

What constitutes a suspicious letter or parcel?  (Remember, these are only guidelines.  Use your best judgment when determining if a letter or package is suspicious.)

--  It is marked with the word "Anthrax."
--  It has a non-identifiable powdery substance on the outside.
--  It is unexpected or from someone unfamiliar to you.
--  Is addressed to someone no longer with your organization or is otherwise outdated.
--  Has no return address, or has one that cannot be verified as legitimate.
--  Is of unusual weight, given its size, or is lopsided or oddly shaped.
--  Has an unusual amount of tape on it.
--  Is marked with restrictive endorsements such as "personal" or "confidential".
--  Has a strange odor or stain.
--  Shows a city or country in the postmark that does not match the return address.

What do I do if I receive such a letter or package that I believe contains Anthrax?
--  Do not shake or empty the contents of any suspicious envelope or package.
--  Place the envelope or package in a plastic bag or some other type of container to prevent leakage of contents.
--  If you do not have any container, then cover the envelope or package with anything (e.g., clothing, paper, trash can, etc.) and do not remove this cover.
--  Leave the room and close the door, or section off the area to prevent others from entering (i.e., keep others away).
-- Wash your hands with soap and water to prevent spreading any powder to your face.
--  Notify your local building security official or an available supervisor.  Have them call 911 to alert the local police authorities.
--  List all people who were in the room or area when this suspicious letter or package was recognized. Give this list to both the local public health authorities and law enforcement officials for follow-up investigations and advice.
If you open an envelope or package and a suspicious powder spills out:
--  Do not try to clean up the powder.  Cover the spilled contents immediately with anything (e.g., clothing, paper, trash can, etc.) and do not remove this cover!
--  Leave the room and close the door, or section off the area to prevent others from entering (i.e., keep others away).
--  Wash your hands with soap and water to prevent spreading any powder to your face.  Report the incident to your local building security official or an available supervisor.  Have them call 911 to alert the local police authorities.
--  Remove heavily contaminated clothing as soon as possible and place in a plastic bag, or some other container that can be sealed.  This clothing bag should be given to the emergency responders for proper handling.
--  Shower with soap and water as soon as possible.  Do not use bleach or other disinfectant on your skin.
--  If possible, list all people who were in the room or area, especially those who had actual contact with the powder. Give this list to both the local public health authorities so that proper instructions can be given for medical follow-up, and to law enforcement officials for further investigation.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/10/2000 02:02 PM -----

	Katherine Brown
	10/10/2000 09:58 AM

		 To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diomedes
Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy_Fowler@pgn.com,
Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth
Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca P Mark/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, J Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
E White/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Castillo/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia
Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron, Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy
Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Beena
Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Rosane Fabozzi/SA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary_trosper@pgn.com,
Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol Ann Brown/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee
Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tori L
Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores
Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mercedes Estrada/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauren
Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine
Brown/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam Benson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jana
Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Bobbie
Power/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Suzanne Danz/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Executive Committee List - Updates

Updates
Mark Frevert - new cellular number


Cheers Big Ears

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Romano, Marcello
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:04 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	It's off - Snickie


Frank - I'm forwarding the email I received from Enserco regarding the
penalty for our failure to take the full volume on days 1 and 18 on deal
#423705.  As I explained to Suzanne, I would not have paid this had they
invoiced me for it but Enserco is a Netout customer and we were in a net
receivable position this month so they deducted this amount out of what they
paid me.  As the penalty seems to be legitimate, can I get you to set up a
new deal in Sitara to offset the receivable?  If you agree with their
calculations, can you set up a positive Demand charge of $2,405.03 with Enron
as the Purchaser and Enserco as the Seller?

Please reply to this email with your approval (or disapproval) of their
calculation and let me know when you have the demand charge set up (or not).

Call me if you have any questions.
...Chuck
x.36275
---------------------- Forwarded by Charles Jacobs/NA/Enron on 11/27/2000
04:15 PM ---------------------------

"Nancy Lissel" <nlissel@telusplanet.net> on 11/22/2000 04:24:51 PM
To: <charles.jacobs@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: October Malin Penalties

Charles
?
Please find attached the worksheet for the October  Daily Malin Penalty
calculation.
?
Please call with any questions or  concerns.
?
Darrell Danyluk
403-269-5522
 - oct enron penalties.xls


Steve - here is a brief update.  The answer to the question on why exchanges
should remain regulated, while we stay unregulated.  The answer is:  "Enron
provides a variety of risk manangement services to our customers, but these
are not futures contracts which the CFTC has primary jurisdiction to
regulate.  We offer swaps, hubrids, etc., but no futures".  The CFTC does
maintain anitfraud and manipulation authority if market abuses are discovered.

Let me know when you have time to make the call to Chairman Combest sometime
on Monday AM.

Thanks- Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Long/Corp/Enron on 09/22/2000 05:47
PM ---------------------------

RAISLERK@sullcrom.com on 09/22/2000 04:59:21 PM
To: goetscrj@bp.com, kneenjm@bp.com, mcadammj@bp.com,
elaine@citizenspower.com, clong@enron.com, csandhe@enron.com,
Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com, laurie.ferber@gs.com,
hall2r@kochind.com, lanced@kochind.com, william.mccoy@msdw.com,
steven.kline@pge-corp.com, schindlg@phibro.com, mgoldstein@sempratrading.com
cc:

Subject: Update on CEA Modernization

Chris Long (Enron) and I spent yesterday on Capitol Hill.  We met with House
Agriculture Committee Minority and Majority Staff, Senate Banking Committee
Staff and Senate Agriculture Committee Staff.  The bill clearly is moving and
there is a good chance it will go to the Floor of the House next week.  The
bilateral exemption for physical commodities (non-agricultural commodities)
is accepted and should be secure.  We have problems with the electronic
trading facility exemption for physical commodities.

House

The House Agriculture Committee remains inclined to exclude metals from the
exemption.  We are working with the Commerce Committee (which has not
excluded metals) to change that result.

Senate

We have a much more severe problem in the Senate.  Senate democrats led by
Senator Harkin are very concerned to go against the CFTC in favor of big
energy companies.  They want the CFTC to endorse the exemption.
Unfortunately, as you are aware, the CFTC (recently the Chairman himself)
have been heavily lobbying against the exemption.  We are working with staff
and will keep you posted.

We have prepared talking points and bullets which are still in draft to
distribute to the Hill.  I would appreciate your comments on them and your
thoughts.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Bullets.doc
 - H.R. 4541 Energy Group Talking Points.doc


Perfectly replayed.

Let me know if you need anything further to proceed immediately.

Thanx,
Laura

	From:  Kay Mann                           08/30/2000 05:01 PM

To: Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Manlove Monetization

Since the time frame is short, I wanted to give you an outline to mark
up/correct.

Here's how I understand the deal:

People's has the Manlove gas storage facility.  We have presented to People's
a nonphysical method to monetize it, similar to what was done with Bammel.
Since this is a regulated asset, regulatory approval will be required, and
the consumers will receive part of the benefit of the monetization.  The
essence of our deal is that Enron will receive 50% of the net earnings, up to
$25mm, as our fee.  In consideration for this fee, Enron takes the financial,
legal, accounting and engineering lead. Peoples and Enron will work together
on the regulatory strategy formulation and implementation.

We want to present a draft MOU to Peoples this week.  The basic goals are:

Define scope of the agreement
Define our lead role in the 4 stated areas
Create exclusivity for Enron
Define financial arrangements (cost/profit)
Get an acknowledgement that what was presented to them was proprietary, and
covered by our confidentiality agreement.
Define term (5 years)

Each party bears their own internal costs, and third party costs are split
50/50, with prior approval.  In that regard an immediate concern is getting
the engineering work kicked off.

We want the agreement broad enough to cover physical withdrawals.  We do not
want it specific to this field, since we want the benefit of the use of our
methodology.

Please correct/supplement, etc.

Thanks,

Kay


What's the status of our analysis?  Has anyone heard anything from Dennis or
Tino lately?  I get concerned when they disappear for weeks like they
sometimes do.  Thanks.  DF


<<was2_343138_2.doc>>
Jim,

Dan Watkiss asked me to send this to him via you.  Please provide it in time
for the 4 p.m. meeting.

Thanks.
Jan Paul Acton
Vice President
Charles River Associates
1201 F St., NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20004-1204
Voice: (202) 662 3902
Fax: (202) 662 3910

****************************************************************************
*****
This electronic message contains information from the consulting firm of
Charles River Associates Inc., which may be confidential or privileged.  The
information is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above.
If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited.  If you have received this electronic transmission in error,
please notify us by telephone (617 425-3582) or by e-mail
(postmaster@crai.com) immediately.
****************************************************************************
*****

 - was2_343138_2.doc


I noticed a couple of minor errors and/or typos in the EOL documents.  Please
open my attachments--the errors are shown in pink in the GTC.  There is only
one error I noticed in the product description--I highlighted it in blue.
Any questions, please advise.

,

To: Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron, Carl Carter/NA/Enron@Enron, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Revised GTC and Product Descrp.

Attached are redlines of the latest revisions.  Please let me know if you
have any questions.


To:  The Legal Trading Committee

In light of some recent comments of one of our counterparties, we are
considering amending the Enron Canada Corp. Master Firm Gas Purchase/Sale
Agreement (the "Master Physical Agreement") to clarify the events
constituting  a "Seller's Deficiency Default" (see s.6.2) and a "Buyer's
Deficiency Default" (see s.6.4).  We are also considering expanding the
suspension rights of a "Notifying Party" to include the suspension of
"receipts of Gas" under s.10.1.

In this regard, please find attached a draft of an amended Master Physical
Agreement which has been blacklined to indicate the aforementioned proposed
changes.

When you get the opportunity, please let me know if you think these changes
are suitable/warranted.  I can be reached directly at (403) 974-6708.

Thanks,

Mark Powell


Something is definitely wrong with that man!!!   Why do you always get him
started?


I've volunteered Kathleen to help process the paper.

ckm

From: Chris Booth/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 02:12 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: FW: Escrow Agreement

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Young, Michael" <Michael.Young@northwestern.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Young+2C+20Michael+22+20+3CMichael+2EYoung+40northwester
n+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Booth, Chris
Cc: 'margueritekahn@paulhastings.com'
Subject: Escrow Agreement

Chris, per our conversation this afternoon, this e-mail will document the
fact that, due to travel schedules, NorthWestern is unable to obtain the
necessary officer signatures for the incumbency documents requested by
Citibank as part of establishing the escrow arrangement called for under the
Letter Agreement.  You agreed that NorthWestern could complete the necessary
paperwork with Citibank on Tuesday of next week.  Thanks again for your
flexibility.

Michael J. Young
Senior Corporate Counsel
NorthWestern Corporation
125 S. Dakota Avenue
Sioux Falls, SD  57104
Fax:  605/978-2840
Phone:  605/978-2836
Cell:  605/351-4040


Stephanie is ill today.  She expects to be back at work tomorrow.

Thanks!

Holly Keiser
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Phone: 713-345-7893
Fax: 713-646-3490
Location: EB 3887
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


Thanks for this memo -- definitely comforting for the vast majority of our
swap business.  I think the additional interesting question is whether or not
we lose the benefit of the special treatment under the bankruptcy code when
we enter into cross-product (i.e. physical and financial products) netting
and joint credit support arrangements.  If we net all of our trading
exposures under multiple agreements (swap agreements and gas, power, steel,
coal, etc. trading agreements) to determine how much credit support should be
posted and then only ask for a single LC that supports the whole shebang, do
we lose this protection since arguably we are no longer just "under a swap
agreement?"  Would you like me to ask Emory to expand?

	Julia Murray
	05/24/2001 06:28 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Letters of Credit; Preference; Swap Transactions

fyi

Julia Heintz Murray
Managing Director and General Counsel
Enron Wholesale Services
Enron Industrial Markets LLC
1400 Smith Street, EB3838
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-4794
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
julia.murray@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Julia Murray/HOU/ECT on 05/24/2001 06:28 PM -----

	"Ireland, Emory" <eireland@foleylaw.com>
	Sent by: "Steiner, Judith A." <JSteiner@foleylaw.com>
	05/24/2001 11:36 AM

		 To: "'julia.murray@enron.com'" <julia.murray@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Letters of Credit; Preference; Swap Transactions

 - 1014549_1.DOC


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Natural Gas Delivered on Wednesday, November  28, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Tuesday, November  27, 2001)
Click here to access index history .
                                                                                * volume represents sell-side only *

Region     Hub	High	Low	Wtd Avg Index	Change ($)	Vol (mmBtu)	Hub Name
 LOUISIANA
    ANR SE	          $2.0900	          $1.6200	          $1.8653	+    .0773	         335,000	American Natural Resources Pipeline Co. - SE  Transmission Pool
    Columbia Onshore	          $2.0000	          $1.5950	          $1.7426	+    .0098	         289,800	Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. - Onshore Pool
    Henry Hub	          $2.0700	          $1.6500	          $1.8990	+    .0821	       1,259,500	Henry Hub tailgate - Louisiana
    NGPL LA	          $2.1700	          $1.6300	          $1.9199	+    .1225	         265,800	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Louisiana Pool
    Tenn 500L	          $2.0500	          $1.4800	          $1.8412	+    .2200	         214,500	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 500 Leg Pool
    Tenn 800L	          $2.0500	          $1.4700	          $1.7692	+    .1305	         221,300	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 800 Leg Pool
    TETCO ELA	          $2.0000	          $1.6100	          $1.8331	+    .1944	         250,700	Texas Eastern - East LA
    TETCO WLA	          $2.1250	          $1.5500	          $1.8223	+    .2301	         211,800	Texas Eastern - West LA
    Transco 65	          $1.9700	          $1.6200	          $1.8037	+    .0136	         145,500	Transco - Station 65
    Trunkline ELA	          $2.0200	          $1.4600	          $1.8193	+    .1175	         138,500	Trunkline Gas Company - East Louisiana Pool
    TxGas SL	          $1.9800	          $1.6200	          $1.8437	+    .0955	         374,400	Texas Gas Transmission Corp.-Zone SL FT Pool
 MIDCONTINENT
    MichCon, citygate	          $2.5000	          $1.9750	          $2.3028	+    .2782	         270,200	Michigan Consolidated
    NGPL Midcont	          $2.2600	          $1.7700	          $2.1324	+    .3366	         157,700	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Mid-Continent Pool
    NGPL Nicor, citygate	          $2.4700	          $1.8400	          $2.1943	+    .2759	       1,146,800	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nicor Citygate
    NGPL NIPSCO, citygate	          $2.4800	          $1.8550	          $2.2151	+    .2344	         237,800	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nipsco Citygate
    NNG Demarcation	          $2.4600	          $2.2000	          $2.3617	+    .2849	         234,800	Northern Natural Gas, Demarcation Pool
 NORTHEAST
    Columbia TCO	          $2.1000	          $1.6000	          $1.8440	+    .1063	         710,500	Columbia Gas Co. - TCO Pool
    Dominion So.Point	          $2.2300	          $1.6000	          $1.9018	+    .1479	         243,400	Dominion - South Point
    TETCO M3	          $2.6000	          $1.7425	          $2.1459	+    .2367	         218,900	Texas Eastern - M3 Zone
    Transco Z-6 (NY)	          $2.7500	          $1.7600	          $2.1603	+    .0924	         130,200	Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. - Zone 6 (NY)
 WEST
    El Paso non-Bondad	          $2.3800	          $2.1800	          $2.3038	+    .3327	         159,000	El Paso - San Juan Basin, Blanco Pool
    Huntingdon/Sumas	          $2.4650	          $2.3500	          $2.4238	+    .2272	         117,600	Westcoast Energy & Northwest Pipeline Corp.
    Opal	          $2.3000	          $2.0500	          $2.1438	+    .2545	          75,800	Opal
    PG?Citygate	          $2.7200	          $2.4500	          $2.6311	+    .3528	         161,500	PG?- Citygate
    SoCal Border	          $2.6000	          $2.3500	          $2.4317	+    .3114	         308,400	Southern California Border Points (Ehrenberg,Topock,Needles)
 WEST TEXAS
    El Paso - Keystone	          $2.4100	          $2.1750	          $2.3286	+    .3599	         396,000	El Paso - Keystone Pool
    Waha	          $2.4150	          $1.9000	          $2.3326	+    .3120	         284,000	Waha Hub - West Texas

                                                                                Includes all firm physical fixed price trades done from 7 AM to 11:30 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for natural gas delivered on the specified date(s).
                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.
You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com .
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe .
                                                                                ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


Please give me some information regarding the gas contracts referenced in
your e-mail. Are you working with Brant Reves in credit?  I am unclear as to
the "gas contracts".

Thanks!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 04:01 PM -----

	Dan J Hyvl
	06/21/2000 03:54 PM

		 To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Guaranty Agreement

Do you know what this is about?  Credit says we have a $100MM guarantee from
this company guaranteeing their entities including the one named in the
guaranty.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 03:52 PM -----

	"Joy Toups" <Joy.Toups@enron.com>
	06/21/2000 02:20 PM

		 To: dhyvl@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Guaranty Agreement

     Attached for your review is a guaranty agreement from Aquila Energy.
Please let me know if this is acceptable.  Also, gas contracts are ready for
execution, will you be initialling them  prior to execution?

     Thanks.

                    (See attached file: Aquilaguar.doc)

 - Aquilaguar.doc


713-646-2391

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parker, Megan
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:30 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	Citizens

Kim:
Just so you know, Citizens has sent a termination letter for our contract with Citizens Utility.  If you would like a copy, please send your fax number to me.

Megan


Can you take care of this?

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Aldis, Laura
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:56 PM
To:	Murphy, Melissa Ann; Evans, Casey; White, Stacey W.; Symes, Kate; Dunton, Heather; Reeves, Kathy
Cc:	Martin, Karen Y; Prelli, Peter
Subject:	Please test Deal Entry

Deal Entry needs your user testing today.  The Production freeze starts tomorrow so we have to move this today if it is ok or it cannot be moved for another 2 weeks.
Kroum made some changes so that the long deals done in Canada will not crash the system.  You should not see a change at all.  They had over 2000 transactions that replication could not keep up with, but that has been fixed.
I will be calling you to make sure you are able to test.  I appreciate all your help.
Thank you!

Laura Aldis
Quality Assurance-EnPower Support Group
713-345-4410


$4.27 by $4.29


Jeff, I would like to discuss this with you and your plans in gas.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 06/09/2000
06:49 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Edward D Baughman                           06/07/2000 12:13 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: East Power Mid-Market Org. Chart

Dave & John:

As requested, the attached organization chart lays out the MM commercial
teams including regulatory experts. Please let me know if you have any
questions.

Regards,  Ed


Elizabeth and Christian:

This morning I spoke with Geritt Hull, Bonneville's trading lawyer, about
putting an EEI in place between Enron and BPA.  He said there was "no
interest" in using the EEI at this time.  Before, the agency resisted using
the agreement because it was unfamiliar with the EEI.  Now, however, the
agency has reviewed the EEI---and decided it didn't like what it saw.  This
"review" appears to have consisted of (1) an internal legal meeting and (2) a
meeting this morning between Geritt and Dave Mills (who heads BPA's trading
floor).  After a first look, BPA has the following concerns about the EEI:

1.  If BPA does some transactions under the EEI, it will then have two
different agreements.  BPA prefers having one standardized agreement (WSPP).

2.  The Schedule M provisions are unfavorable to governmental entities.  The
WSPP does not have these additional obligations.

3.  Tracking of credit/mark to market exposure is a concern for BPA because
it does not have systems in place to do this.  I explained to Geritt that
these provisions would be for BPA's benefit.  BPA need not calculate these
amounts day-to-day; it could wait until it hit the "nervous nellie" standard,
and then do the calculations, at which time, if the thresholds had been met,
it could call for more collateral.  This seemed to help; BPA had seen this
part as a burden---"oh, we'll have to start doing daily mark-to-market
calculations!"

4.  "This agreement seems to favor marketers."  I reminded Geritt that BPA is
a marketer, too.  "Well, we haven't been selling much lately.  We're buyers
now." (This is a disconcerting because at this time of year BPA is usually
spilling water for salmon AND selling lots of extra power).

5.  Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the head of BPA's trading floor,
Dave Mills, is opposed to the agreement because he doesn't want to use a
second master.

I asked Geritt who could say "yes" to the EEI and he said, "Dave Mills, if
anyone."  But he also said that "like everything at BPA, a decision like this
would be part of a broad consensus."

Geritt has been charged with preparing an analysis of the two agreements.

Next Steps

Christian has suggested that we ask Greg Wolfe and Holli Krebs to put
pressure on the BPA traders to use this agreement.

I am taking Geritt to lunch on Wednesday.

----Steve

Geritt said that BPA has given the EEI an internal review and decided not to
made the following conclusions:

1.  Using the EEI


Here is the e-mail that Bruce just sent me.  Make sure that you do not use
this for any binding agreements or client discussion purposes.  These are the
numbers I have used in my model and here are the new Plano numbers.  If you
have any questions please give me a call and I will walk you through the
changes.  Thanks
Ben
3-7998


Gas Market Winter Outlook:  Fundamental Questions

This conference call is Thursday, October 18, at 10:00 a.m. and is CERA's winter preview show.  I will arrange with CERA for our participation.  You can call into the 800 number below if you are in Houston, Minneapolis or other locations.  For those attending in Omaha, Room 697 is reserved for you.  I will register for all of the ETS staff, just identify yourself as Enron and give your name when calling.

I hope to see you there!

Lorna M. Brennan
Competitive Intelligence
Enron Transportation Services
Omaha  402-398-7573

---------------------

Title: Gas Market Winter Outlook: Fundamental Questions
URL(s):

http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2745;

***********************************************************************

TOPICS

   *  Demand: Waiting for a Rebound

   *  Supply: Stalling Growth

   *  Storage: Reaching Maximums?

FORMAT

Speakers:

Bob Esser, Senior Director and Consultant
Paul Hoffman, Associate Director, North American Natural Gas
Bryan Sanderson, Associate Director, North American Gas
Jen Snyder, Director, North American Natural Gas
Ed Small, Director, North American Natural Gas

Time: 11:00 AM Eastern, Thursday, October 18, 2001

Eligibility: Clients eligible to participate in this conference call are those
who subscribe to the CERA North American Gas Retainer Advisory Service.

TO ENROLL

To enroll, please send a fax to Katya Ashe at (617) 497-0423, or enroll via
e-mail at kashe@cera.com before 9:00 A.M., Thursday, October 18, 2001. Please
include your name, company, and telephone number with your correspondence.

Enrollment is not mandatory but assists us in optimizing the conference
experience. If you are unable to pre-register, please follow the directions
below to participate on the day of the call.

Follow above URL and click through to the Full Report for instructions to
participate in the call (audio and Internet information).

**end**

E-mail Category: Conference Call Notification
CERA Knowledge Area(s): North American Gas

***********************************************************************
***********************************************************************
CERA's Autumn 2001 Roundtable event dates and agendas
are now available at http://www20.cera.com/event
***********************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www20.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Carol made some proposed changes to the MAC language and asked me to send it
to you to get your input.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/20/99 11:31 AM
---------------------------

Carol St Clair
09/17/99 01:31 PM
To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: MAC Language

Shari:
I have rearranged some of your language just to make it fit better as an
Event of Default.  Let me know what you think.
Carol


Hello, Mr. Derrick--Nancy asked me to email these letters to you.  One is
to you from Nancy, sent on 11/20 and concerning the Executive Committee
meeting in San Antonio next spring.  The other two are draft letters for
your approval--one sent to the Executive Committee, the other to the firm
contacts after the first of next year.  Please let me know if you have
trouble opening these documents, and I'll fax them to you.

Best regards,

Tom

 - Derrick to AAEC/100% Club.doc


Legal Department,

Thanks for sticking with us while we worked through the virus issue.

STEPS WE ARE TAKING TO ELIMINATE VIRUSES:

- Our NT Server Team has dedicated two workstations that continually (24
hours 7 days a week) scan the legal directory and its subfolders.
- Our application support team actively checks for the latest version of the
virus scanning software on a moment to moment basis
- Our infrastructure/architecture group has automated the process of keeping
workstations up to date.

TO DO YOUR PART:

Every night, log out of your machine.  Leave your machine at the "Hit
Control-Alt-Delete to log on prompt". This will insure that the workstations
get the most current version of the virus detecting software.

Please contact the help desk if virus issues persist.

I feel confident that the steps we have taken will dramatically reduce the
number of viruses your department has experienced.

Thanks

Mark Davidson


Highlighted means that we have an agreement that you are not comfortable with
at this point?  I just finished going through the European names with Michael
and Paul.  Luckily a small enough office that we can get through the actual
CA's pretty quickly.

Any chance we have any flexibility on ATT, Lucent, Air Products, Dow, DuPont,
GE, IMC, Minnesota Mining&Mfg., Pitney Bowes, Praxair, Sprint.  We only have
5 that we can take off without needing to put additional names up?

	From:  Mark Taylor                           22/02/2000 21:15

To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Credit Derivatives Reference Entities

Here is the revised list - there are several European entities that we showed
in our database so I have highlightedd them as well.  There were also several
from Friday's list that were still there so I have also bolded those.  I'll
try to track down what happened with those entities (Cinergy, DPL, NJ Nat
Gas, Niagara Mohawk & Washington Gas Light).


Shirley,

I shall pay for the trip, I cannot pay for the conference.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"MacMillan, Ian" <macmilli@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22MacMillan+2C+20Ian+22+20+3Cmacmilli+40wharton+2Eupenn+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 8:39 AM
To:	'vkamins@enron.com'
Subject:	SMS conference

Hi Vince.

We really feel that there could be enormous benefit to your presenting at the SMS conference.
So few people are actually using real options in practice and we feel that the topic is critical in these uncertain times.
I am very happy to cover the conference costs out of my Chair budget - that is what the Chair is for!


-----Original Message-----
From: Quick, Joan
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:05 AM
To: Quick, Joan
Subject: janine - JShipp@samedan.com


This is an automatic confirmation of the order you have placed using IT
Central.

Request Number:   ECTH-4TRNV3
Order For:               Errol McLaughlin

1 x ( PALM Vx CONNECTED ORGANIZER     $347 ) Enron IT Purchasing


Mitch,

Please provide this information to Benjamin Rogers.   I am on vacation this
week and don't have access to the data.

Thanks,
Rick

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron on
11/20/2000 07:52 AM ---------------------------

Benjamin Rogers@ECT
11/19/2000 02:59 PM
To: Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:

Rick:
Here is the file with the performance data we worked on for the 2000's.  A
Brownsville tab has been added - could you please assist us in putting this
data together for Brownsville.  Please give me a call if you have any
questions.  Thanks!
Ben


Hello, Mr. Derrick--Nancy asked that I send you this draft memo for your
review/approval.  Please let me know if you have difficulty opening it
and/or what changes need to be made to it.  Thanks.

Best regards,

Tom

 - Lifetime Achievement memo.doc


Many thanks,

Clare

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 2:37 PM
To: Clare.Godson@AllenOvery.com
Cc: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
Subject: RE: ISDA Master Agreement: Deutsche

We do have a Credit Support Annex in place.  Once we sign the ENA
agreement, we will make your requests to DB.

                    Clare.Godson@Alle

                    nOvery.com               To:     richard.sage@enron.com,
tana.jones@enron.com
                                             cc:
James.Clarry@AllenOvery.com
                    12/05/2000 06:08         Subject:     RE: ISDA Master
Agreement: Deutsche
                    AM

Tana,

Thanks for keeping us updated on the Deutsche negotiations.  If, as you
suggest, Deutsche can prepare a Master for the EnronCredit.com Limited
Master as the docs are on their system then this would be useful, and I
will
review and comment on those.  The one thing they will need to ensure as you
mentioned is that the Master Agreement is governed by English law.  In
addition, I  am not sure if you have put a CSA in place with Deutsche, but
if you have (presumably a Paragraph 13 under the NY law CSA?) we would need
the corresponding Paragraph 11 to the English Law CSA.

Many thanks again and we look forward to progressing this matter.

Kind regards,

Clare

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Clarry, James:ICM (LN)
> Sent:   Friday, December 01, 2000 10:30 AM
> To:     Godson, Clare:ICM (LN)
> Subject:     FW: ISDA Master Agreement: Deustche
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Richard.Sage@enron.com@ALLEN & OVERY
> Sent:   Friday, December 01, 2000 10:25 AM
> To:     Clarry, James:ICM (LN)
> Subject:     Re: ISDA Master Agreement: Deustche
>
>  << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
> FYI
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Sage/LON/ECT on 01/12/2000
> 10:27 ---------------------------
>
> From: Tana Jones on 30/11/2000 17:00 CST
>
> To:   Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
> cc:
>
> Subject:  Re: ISDA Master Agreement: Deustche  (Document link: Richard
>       Sage)
>
> FYI,
>
> Bill Bradford in Credit had a conference call today with the Deutsche
Bank
> Credit person and I think we have come to agreement on not adding any
> specified entities to the ISDA Master Agreement.  He also discussed
> proposed credit limits for the three other Deutsche Bank masters we want
> to
> get in place (including EnronCredit.com).  I think we are done now and
> hope
> to get execution documents from them, since the documents are on their
> system.  Our intention is to then get Deutsche Bank to turn around 3 like
> masters, making any changes necessitated by change of law, and otherwise
> turn around the remaining masters quickly.  I'll keep you posted.
>
>
>
>                     Richard Sage
>                                          To:     Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
>                     11/30/2000           cc:
>                     10:52 AM             Subject:     Re: ISDA Master
> Agreement: Deustche
>
>
>
>
>
> If you do add all the entities, does that mean that we would not need to
> put in place a separate agreement for ECCL?
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Sage/LON/ECT on 30/11/2000
> 16:53 ---------------------------
>
> From: Tana Jones on 27/11/2000 15:45 CST
>
> To:   Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT
> cc:   Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
>
> Subject:  Re: ISDA Master Agreements  (Document link: Richard Sage)
>
> With respect to Deutsche Bank (""DB"), we have one credit issue
remaining,
> DB would like us to add all the Enron trading entities DB trades with as
> Specified Entities under the ISDA Master Agreement and we are somewhat
> hesitant to do so, as this could potentially roll up swaps under
> structured
> loan transactions into a default under the ISDA Agreement.  Sara and Bill
> Bradford in Credit are supposed to talk to the DB Credit people about
this
> remaining issue.
>
> With respect to First Union National Bank, the draft we were working from
> was so old that they agreed to look at our current form of agreement
which
> was sent to them on 11/8/00 for review.  Sara is working on that with
> Susan
> Bailey, another paralegal in our Group.
>
>
>
>                     Denis
>                     O'Connell            To:     Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
>                                          cc:     Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
>                     11/22/2000           Subject:     ISDA Master
> Agreements
>                     06:05 AM
>
>
>
>
>
> Tana - can you please give me an update on where you are in the
> negotiations of the ISDA with the following counterparties and confirm
> which Enron entity you are negotiating on behalf of.
>
> Tks,
>
> Denis
>
>
> First Union National Bank
>
> Deutsched Bank AG
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>  - att1.eml <<
> File: att1.eml >>

======================================================================

This email is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the
intended recipient please notify us immediately by telephoning +44 (20)
7330 3000 and requesting the Technology Services Helpdesk. You should not
copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other
person.

Allen & Overy
One New Change
London
EC4M 9QQ

Tel:+44 (20) 7330 3000
Fax: +44 (20) 7330 9999
General Email: Helpdesk@allenovery.com
www: http://www.allenovery.com

Allen & Overy is a solicitors' partnership.  A list of the names of
partners and their professional qualifications is open to inspection at the
above office.  The partners are either solicitors or registered foreign
lawyers.

======================================================================


Cory,

Still  finding discrepancies Cin schedules, - or finding duplicate
schedules-ERCOT this weekend.   Overall,   acuracy is improving, however
still seeing schedules missing from time to time which  is taking us longer
than usual to finish checkouts .

thanks for your attention
JOE


503119
broker has us selling


July is GEPS Safety Month!

Please read the following message from Rich Lubert, GEPS EHS General Manager:

Ladies & Gentlemen

July is EHS/Security month throughout our business.  This is a great
opportunity for each site to complete a number of business critical employee
training and awareness initiatives.  Your efforts to date have ensured that
our business continues to improve dramatically in EHS, security and medical
areas.  The EHS month, with a variety of focus programs, will enable the
business to make a quantum leap forward.  We have developed a set of program
expectations for each site to roll out over the month.  Most of these are not
complicated, often requiring only a few minutes of employee time to update
records or complete training.  Other programs will drive increased employee
awareness and commitment, assisting in improvements beyond the month long
effort.  This will take everyone,s commitment and attention to be
successful.   We will be sending out details on each item in next few days.
Please work with your local sites to assign team members to each role/program
to ease the implementation

Thanks in advance

Rich Lubert

The GEWE EHS department, along with other GEPS companies, has put together a
schedule of safety events.  Please see below:

Week of July 1
Create and Present a Safety Meeting. Departments (larger departments can be
broken into smaller groups) create a topic of their concern and submit as
posters, videos, dramatization, etc. Safety meeting presentations will begin
on July 30. Judging will be based on topic, creativity, presentation and
employee involvement.  All participating departments will enjoy a pizza party
or BBQ on site and winning presentation(s) will enjoy an off site lunch.

Week of July 15
Fast Fact Sheets. A fact sheet will be distributed to each employee as a
refresher on the various EHS plans and policies.  The handout will be a handy
quick reference tool in case an emergency arises.

Week of July 22
EHS Kick Off Meetings.  On Tuesday, July 23 and Wednesday, July 24 Jim
Heenan, GEWE EHS Manager, will be conducting EHS kickoff meetings which is
mandatory for all employees. The EHS Integration Training will cover GE's
specific company-wide EHS goals for 2002. It also illustrates the alignment
between the goals and the objectives of Policy 20.3 as well as the corporate
program requirements linked to each objective.

Week of July 29
Quarterly Office Safety Meetings.  With the start of a new quarter, it,s time
again for an OSHA required office safety meeting.  Meetings for the North
building will be on Tuesday, July 30, in the northwest lunchroom.  Meetings
for the South building will be on Wednesday, July 31, in the Safety Trailer.
Available meeting times for both days will be 8:00am, 9:00am, 10:00am,
11:00am, 1:00pm, 2:00pm.  Further meeting details will be available soon.


Corry,

Who is the "owner" of the path?  My understanding is that the path only needs to be confirmed once, but which counterparty is the path confirmed with; the supply or market?

e.g.

Supply				Market
DUKE		-E-		ENTERGYPOW

Confirm with Duke?
Confirm with Entergy?

Thanks,
Will

P.S.
I will send a revised table structure sometime today for your review.


Congratulations to you both!  Your designation as V.Ps. is richly deserved!
Just among us "constrained technical" people, however,  couldn't they have
come up with a better description of our category?  It makes us sound like we
are deficient in something other than just career choice!  See you
soon--beers are on me!  DF


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/24/2000
04:48 PM ---------------------------

Paulo Issler
02/24/2000 02:33 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: LJM

Vince/Stinson:

The following is an update on LJM deal:

1) I participated on a conference call with AA (Jitendra and others) and our
Accounting/Credit Group (Wes, Bill Bradford and others) yesturday, in which
we discussed the best approach for definining credit reserves at year-end for
the puts we own.
2) A big chunck of the meeting was dedicated to explain AA the details of the
deal. Little progress was made on achieving the meeting's goal.
3) Apparently, Accounting did want to expose the calculation we made for puts
value that considers credit risk - the two factor model we developed. That
line of action was implied on a pre-meeting we had early that morning. From
my understanding, Accounting argues that we should not make any credit
reserve because we could not liquidate our position by year-end.
4) At a certain point Jintendra suggested me to use a two factor
MC-simulation for calculating the position with credit risk. The approach is
actually a more simplified version of the model we have. I and nobody
mentioned the results we got from our 2-factor model.
5) At that same afternoon I knew from Accounting that we are in a process of
unwinding our position.

These are the main points. Please let me know if need more details.

Paulo Issler


Asst: MaryAnn


i bought a big bertha and i was stroking it last night straight and deep.


Hi All--

Attached is the Inside FERC summary of the FERC's order in the Transco 1Line / Order 637 proceeding and in the Texas Gas cash-out proceeding.

Transco is saying they won't implement "prior to April 1" but haven't decided on an implementation and training schedule as of yet. .The Order did not specify a date by which Transco had to implement.  Transco will have to make another filing to comply with this Order, so it may still be a little while before everything is finalized.  Given that the FERC did not speak to the cost of the system in this order (almost $80m), it's likely that the dollars will be subject to the on-going negotiations taking place in Transco's RP01-245 rate case proceeding.   I'll coordinate with Tammy to insure that we've got the necessary EDI testing plan in place and that we make the necessary Unify changes.

On Texas Gas, this represents a minor win for us--we had argued that Texas Gas' proposal was not consistent with Order 637 and that they should adopt a more "Transco-like" scheme that creates uncertainty w/o creating undue penalties.  Texas Gas will have to refile & we'll have another go-round between the marketing companies/producers and the LDC's on the Texas Gas system.  Will keep you posted.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Suzanne
x54880
=============================================================================================================
TRANSCO GETS GREEN LIGHT TO IMPLEMENT 1LINE SYSTEM, OTHER RATE CHANGES

Capping a long-running debate over the 1Line proposal, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., with only a minor exception or two, received approval from FERC to implement a new online, interactive computer system. Last month's ruling also went a long way toward completing Transco's effort to comply with orders 637 and 587.  The 1Line system was proposed to enable Transco and other subsidiaries of The Williams Cos. Inc. to put in place new practices and services, including ones related to compliance with orders 637 and 587.

According to Transco, its new scheme cannot be supported by its existing computer systems. But the commission last spring said it was not satisfied with Transco's proposal and asked for a more detailed explanation of how 1Line complies with orders 637 and 587 (IF, 2 April, 16). Looking at the 1Line plan from an order 637 and 587 perspective, FERC in the Sept. 27 order (RP01-236, et al.) found most of the scheme to its liking. It accepted Transco's proposal to change the capacity-release bidding and awarding processes, to incorporate pooling services in its tariff as a new pooling rate schedule, and to provide that any adjustments to a demand bill will be included in a subsequent demand bill, rather than the subsequent commodity bill.

The commission approved Transco's proposal on scheduling equality, which allows shippers acquiring released capacity to submit a nomination at the earliest opportunity after the acquisition of capacity. To raise its comfort level about the provision, FERC directed Transco to change the tariff to permit a shipper's nomination to coincide with the notification of the capacity release transaction and to remove restrictions on the releasing shipper's ability to specify when the release will become effective. FERC also generally was pleased with the provision directing customers to indemnify and hold harmless Transco against all claims. In response to one protester, the commission told the company to remove language that would force customers to indemnify Transco's affiliates as well.

On order 637 matters, FERC was mostly sympathetic to Transco's positions on issues such as imbalance services, operational controls and penalty revenue sharing.
FERC was less enthused with Transco's preferred approach to interaction between the pipeline's segmentation and discounting policies. Refuting the claim that it already complies with order 637 on this issue, FERC directed Transco to add language to its tariff creating a presumption that Transco can rebut a segmenting shipper's right to retain a discounted rate as long as Transco demonstrates that a segmented or secondary point is not similarly situated to point identified in the original transaction. Transco also must add a procedure to its tariff that requires requests to retain discounts to be processed within two hours.

FERC also accepted Transco's existing imbalance cash-out tolerances and tiered cash-out mechanisms, but wanted more information on proposed unauthorized overrun penalties. The pipeline has not ad-equately justified "why such substantial overrun penalties should apply on non-critical days," said the
commission. FERC rejected Transco's proposed transportation charge for imbalance trading, which the pipeline said was needed to recover what it asserts are lost transportation charges. The commission ruled that "Transco has failed to demonstrate that imbalance trades between zones necessarily results in a loss of transportation revenue." But the commission went on to say that it "may be willing to reconsider a remedy if Transco can show that shippers are abusing imbalance trading" to avoid certain charges.

Transco also was directed to justify its proposal to prohibit shippers from trading transportation imbalances and operational balancing agreement imbalances. FERC said that "it is not clear from Transco's explanation why OBA imbalances are so different from shipper transportation imbalances that the two cannot be traded."

=============================================================================================================
FERC ACCEPTED TEXAS GAS' PROPOSAL TO ELIMINATE IMBALANCES on its system by revising its cashout mechanism, while rejecting the proposed use of high/low daily pricing for cashouts. The revamped mechanism, which was developed during and after a technical conference, would enable Texas Gas Transmission Co. to "remove the incentive to engage in price arbitrage on its system," FERC said.

To stop customers from gaming its system, Texas Gas in March proposed (RP01-278) a plan to create a new monthly imbalance tier that would not be subject to cashouts, to eliminate pool-to-pool transfers in the calculation of customer imbalances, and to do away with the provision allowing a processor replacing
plant volume reduction to have its imbalances cashed out at 100% of the applicable index price. Seeing the need for the proposed changes, the commission noted that Texas Gas "has demonstrated with its data a close correlation between the imbalance and price arbitrage that has been taking place for years and has not subsided."

However, FERC rejected the idea of changing the applicable cashout price index at all tier levels to a percentage of either the highest or lowest daily price during the month. Directing Texas Gas to drop the proposed language, the order explained that daily high/low index prices "may unduly increase penalties for imbalances, which is contrary to order 637."

The order went on to say that "a less draconian measure" may be appropriate. For instance, Texas Gas could propose a mechanism "that would inject an element of uncertainty regarding the eventual price" if it wanted to provide "an incentive for shippers to remain in balance," FERC said.


Accused? Easy there.
RT is clean.
Just like you said...all with the tags and the up and up!
B

-----Original Message-----
From: Semperger, Cara
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 1:47 PM
To: Williams III, Bill
Subject: FW: Rate for Unauthorized Use of the Transmission System

Just wanted to make sure you all aren't getting accused of this.

I mainly think it is a Control Area to Control Area issue, as we are always bound by Tags and Oasis numbers

c

-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Virginia
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 11:31 AM
To: Semperger, Cara
Subject: RE: Rate for Unauthorized Use of the Transmission System

Cara-

  Thanks for the forward!  Did the West Desk (especially Real Time) get this?
  Thus far, we have not been accused or charged, as far as I know.

  Virginia

-----Original Message-----
From: Semperger, Cara
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 4:39 PM
To: Thompson, Virginia; Purcell, Mike
Subject: FW: Rate for Unauthorized Use of the Transmission System

Have we been accused of this from them?

-----Original Message-----
From: LYNN RICHARDSON [mailto:LERICHRD@wapa.gov]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:18 PM
To: Clemons, Amy; Semperger, Cara; Robinson, Donald; Runswick, Stacy
Subject: Rate for Unauthorized Use of the Transmission System

Dear Customers-

Effective June 15, 2001, the Rocky Mountain Region (RMR) implemented Rate Schedule L-US1, for Unauthorized Use of the Transmission System and Ancillary Services (copy of rate schedule attached).  This rate schedule was posted to RMR's OASIS website under 'Current Business Practices' on August 4, 2001.

During the month of July 2001, RMR began actively researching after-the-fact usage of RMR-managed transmission and identified some unauthorized use of transmission.  Some of you have been sent letters concerning perceived unauthorized usage in July.  you should receive those letters shortly.

RMR has discovered different causes of unauthorized use occurring within WACM and have attached a list outlining some of those causes.  This list is by no means a complete listing, but rather just what's been seen to date.
A
 s RMR did not post this information publicly until August 4, 2001, we do not feel that we can charge customers for the instances discovered in July, but please be advised that from August 4th forward, this charge will apply.

Please do not hesitate to call me or Paul Humberson at (970) 461-7327 if you have questions or would like to discuss.

Lynn Richardson
Public Utilities Specialist
RMR
(970) 461-7440


Sean,

Give me a call at 1:00.

Thanks,
Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thome, Stephen
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 11:38 AM
To:	Brysch, Jim
Subject:


Oh yeah and I might bring Price Strader too.


Damn, if we could only channel all of this energy writting useless emails,
we could all actually be something! Yall are some funny fucks!!

--- COREY ROBICHEAUX <cjrob23@msn.com> wrote:
> Yo Lenny,
> Glad you finally pulled your big head out of Chemosabe's ass and decided
> to
> chat with us.  Thanks for looking us up when you came to New Orleans, I
> guess since none of us drink Jamison and wack off to the Sundance film
> festival we're not cool...
>
> Anyways, thanks for letting us stay at your maw's place when we go
> skiing.
> Yes I'm going bald but your maw said that if you look good with hair
> then
> you'll look good without it- so this year I'll shave my sack as an added
>
> bonus...  Don't worry about saving for me a place to sleep, I'll just
> make a
> matress out of dog hair from those slobbering, gaseous, farting bulldogs
>
> your maw has.
>
> Wish you were coming on the ski trip, but I realize the gay olympic
> trials
> are in South Beach at the same time, so I understand.  Hope you qualify.
>
> cjrob
>
>
> >From: "Lenhart, Matthew" <Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com>
> >To: "ross_berthelot@bankone.com@ENRON"
> ><IMCEANOTES-ross+5Fberthelot+40bankone+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com>
> >CC: "Scott Naquin <naquinscott@yahoo.com>, Clint Eilbeck"
>
><IMCEANOTES-+22Scott+20Naquin+20+3Cnaquinscott+40yahoo+2Ecom+3E+2C+20Clint+20Eilbeck+22@ENRON.com>,
>
> >   "Myers Namie" <myersnamie@yahoo.com>, "Denis Naquin"
> ><denisnaq@home.com>,   "Tommy Porteous" <tporteous@lemle.com>,   "COREY
>
> >ROBICHEAUX" <cjrob23@msn.com>, "Tanya Flynn" <tennis70810@yahoo.com>,
>
> >"Mike Gooch" <mcg742000@yahoo.com>, "Bernard Guste"
> <bguste@wewill4u.com>,
> >  <chufft@bellsouth.net>, "Scott Dehart" <dehart81@hotmail.com>,   "don
>
> >edgerton" <edgeconstruct@aol.com>
> >Subject: RE: THE OFFICIAL SNOW REPORT!!!!!
> >Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 12:10:28 -0500
> >
> >thanks for including me.  i don't think i will be able to make a ski
> >trip durning that period.  i have to go to miami and party on south
> >beach.  sorry.  maybe if something was scheduled around spring skiing
> >(feb-mar)  i could definately go.  robicheaux is bald?  i remember that
> >bastard was so hairy when i was living with him.  i used to have to
> >shave the soap in the shower after he used it.  i know some of the
> >houston guys would like to go skiing so keep us informed.
> >
> >
> > >  -----Original Message-----
> > > From: 	ross_berthelot@bankone.com@ENRON
> > > Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:39 AM
> > > To:	Lenhart, Matthew
> > > Cc:	"Scott Naquin <naquinscott@yahoo.com>, Clint Eilbeck"; Myers
> > > Namie; Denis Naquin; Tommy Porteous; COREY ROBICHEAUX; Tanya Flynn;
> > > Mike Gooch; Bernard Guste; chufft@bellsouth.net; Scott Dehart; don
> > > edgerton
> > > Subject:	RE: THE OFFICIAL SNOW REPORT!!!!!
> > >
> > >
> > > Lenny! jumping in the conversation without missing a beat....good to
> > > have
> > > you with us. Nice comedy....but the only fat, bald 30 year old is
> the
> > > Dogger. (just kidding dog, you's not fat....you's just fluffy). Don
> is
> > > bald, but not fat. Roby is balding, but just a little "stocky".
> Clint
> > > has a
> > > belly, but is not balding. Other than that, we are all pretty normal
> > > (please use that term loosely).
> > >
> > > Your parents would love to have us at their crib. Dog could rummage
> > > through
> > > all of your belongings, eat all of your parents' food, and wake them
> > > up at
> > > the ass crack of dawn with scrambled eggs and jumby. Roby could show
> > > your
> > > mom "a good time". Porteous, Clay, and Myers could talk to your dad
> > > about
> > > his company's legal shortcomings. Bernie could sell you all some
> much
> > > needed life insurance. Clint could smoke, and Dehart could clear his
> > > lungs
> > > so that he could ski without falling dead on the slopes. Gooch could
> > > lend
> > > Don the money to build an addition to your maw's bathroom (so that
> Dog
> > > and
> > > Roby could smell it up). And Naquin could try to get with your
> sister,
> > > take
> > > notes of the whole weekend's proceedings, and make copies for all of
> > > us to
> > > remember them by.
> > >
> > > Porthole....see if Timmy, Tricia, Mike Thomas, etc. would be
> > > interested in
> > > going on the trip...Lenny....see about all of your Houston Fiji
> > > buddies
> > > (house bitch, Tim, Val, etc.). Tell Tim we'll let him bring his new
> > > wife
> > > with him, too, although that might mean that there could be up to 3
> > > Phi
> > > Mu's on the trip....quorum could be met, and "the Phi Mu Crew" might
> > > be in
> > > full effect; God help us.
> > >
> > > Clint, what about Freret and Dawn (that might make 4 Mu's)?
> > >
> > > Anyone else we can think of who might be interested in this trip
> (Jan
> > > 10 -
> > > 14th)?
> > >
> > >
> > > Ross F. Berthelot
> > > Underwriter
> > > Commercial Real Estate
> > > Ph:   (225) 332-4252
> > > Fax: (225) 332-3154
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This transmission may contain information that is privileged,
> > > confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
> > > you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> > > disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information
> contained
> > > herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If
> you
> > > received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the
> > > sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in
> electronic
> > > or hard copy format. Thank you.
> > >
> >
> >
> >**********************************************************************
> >This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate
> >and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
> of
> >the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
> by
> >others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or
> >authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> >reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> delete
> >all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
> not
> >intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence a
> >binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> >affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
> be
> >relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise.
> >Thank you.
> >**********************************************************************
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


Thanks, Rosalee.

Best,
Jeff

	Rosalee Fleming
	03/13/2001 08:46 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Fellow referred to me by Ken Lay

Hi Steve and Jeff -

This was a cold call to Ken that Vanessa took while we were in Exec. Comm.
meeting.  She had asked Ginger who to refer him to as it was CA. and she
mentioned Jeff.  Please only call if there is any interest.

Rosie

From: Steven J Kean on 03/12/2001 04:46 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Fellow referred to me by Ken Lay

It was not mentioned to me.  I'm copying rosie and vanessa to find out if
this was a simple referral (in which case you should keep the work to a
minimum -- return the call, but don't get distracted from your other efforts)
or whether Ken is especially interested in this and wants us to follow
through.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	03/12/2001 03:54 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fellow referred to me by Ken Lay

Just got a call from a fellow named Jame Edgerly at the Enterprise Zone,
Inc.  He told me that Ken Lay (through Ken's secretary Vanessa) referred me
to him.  He is very interested in getting us to help him work with the
Legislature to establish an "Enterprise Zone" energy tariff to encourage
investment in California's Enterprice Zones.  Before I launch on the effort,
just wanted to check in and see if this rings a bell with you.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


On January 13, 2000, FERC issued a Section 7(c) certificate for
Transwestern's Gallup Expansion.  The Commission's order contained two
conditions:  1) that Transwestern file its discounted rates within 15 days of
the order, and 2) that Transwestern restructure its relationship with Enron
Compression Services so that Transwestern will have sufficient operation
control over the motor at the Gallup compressor station to assume regulatory
responsibility for the motor's operation, and that Transwestern file a report
with the Commission stating how it complied with this condition.
Transwestern accepted the  certificate January 14, 2000 but reserved the
right to seek rehearing or clarification of the order.  On January 18, 2000,
Transwestern filed a motion for extension of time to comply with the
condition that Transwestern file its discounted rates.  Transwestern has
already filed with the Commission the discounted rates it will charge its
expansion shippers, subject to a request for confidentiality.   Transwestern
intends to file a request for rehearing of the January 13 order explaining
why the Commission erred in ordering Transwestern to publicly disclose its
discounted rates in advance of the normal time for making such disclosure
through a discount report.


Hi Eric!
This is Maylynn (Adnan's Fianc?).  I just thought I'd write and "introduce" myself to Adnan's best friend.  I also want to tell you that I was thrilled when Adnan told me you'd be able to make it to our wedding.  It really means a lot to both of us that you're coming.  I can't wait to meet you!  We'll definitely have to hang out and share Adnan stories when you get here :-)  Especially since you'll stay at my place (If Adnan's parents are still here).
Adnan mentioned your single status, and I happen to have one girlfriend who is coming to our wedding by herself.  Please don't get the wrong idea... i just want everyone to enjoy themselves, and you two are the only ones who won't know anyone except myself and Adnan.
Her name is Jane Lee.  I've known her since I was 14.  We went to high school together, and managed to keep in touch through our collegiate years (She went to UCSD).  She's a very attractive-pretty-energetic-not-your-run-of-the-mill-korean girl.  She's very positive, and lots of fun to hang out with.  She's one of the brightest people I know (Next to my good-looking' fiance of course! - I love embarrassing him:-), outgoing and very humorous.  I just thought I'd give you a quick synopsis of Jane (It's hard to fully describe her in a paragraph though).  And yes! She's attractive.
If you're interested, please write and I'll be more than happy to tell her about you, or tell you more about her.  If you'd rather stay solo for the evening, that's totally fine as well :-)  Don't worry, I'm not trying to play matchmaker.  But you two are the only ones that don't have another half (All of my attractive girlfriends that are coming are taken [except Jane], and most of our friends are couples) and I don't want you to feel awkward by yourselves.  Like I said, we both want everyone to fully enjoy themselves and have a memorable evening.  So I thought it would be nice if you kept each other company.
Anyways, I hope to hear from you soon.  Please don't be shy, I'm quite open and very verbal (As you may have heard :-)  So please feel free to write anytime!  Here's my work e-mail (day time 8-5 PST) mmorales@arnel.com
Ciao!   :-)
Maylynn
PS: Adnan said to write:
"Hey dude, told 'ya i'd hook you up!!! (and she's Asian to boot - who's the man?)"


Jeff,

This is my first draft of a settlement summary document.  Let me know what
you think.

 <<April Briefing for CPUC.doc>>

Michael
--
Michael S. Alexander
Southern California Edison
Energy Supply and Marketing
626-302-2029

 - April Briefing for CPUC.doc


WHAT EMAIL? the one with your & in the bowl? The one you drew a fish over
and let Tommy color it in? Sick man. How can I get this damn trailer?
e.

>From: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@ENRON.com>
>To: "Erik Wollam" <erwollam@hotmail.com>
>Subject: RE: running
>Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 13:19:25 -0600
>
>thats a possiblity. did you get the email?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:49 PM
>To: Parks, Joe
>Subject: running
>
>
>Joe if it will get above 32 degrees, I'm ready to go running this week.
>tues
>or wed? at 4:30 at memorial park??? e.
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
>and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
>the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
>others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
>authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
>all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
>intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
>binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
>relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
>Thank you.
>**********************************************************************
>

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


Attached is the proposed contract with Oneok.  Since it is a maximum rate
deal, there is no discount letter.  However, I am circulating this for
approval because it contains a special provision (found in the "Other"
section) regarding marketing of capacity for release, as allowed by Section
30.8 of the General Terms and Conditions of Transwestern's tariff.

Christine, you and Michele will need to fill in the address and account
information.  My sincerest apologies for operating outside the usual
contracting procedure but since time is even more of the essence that usual
here, I felt it was best to get a pro forma version of this out for approval
as soon as possible.

Please e-mail your approval to Christine and me by noon tomorrow if
possible.  Thank you.


Kate, please check with Mark F. to verify if marking okay by delivery point.
Thank you so much.

Stephanie