Thanks Dutch.....I had not be informed until after you made the call!!  So, I begining to wonder about those guys!!

gg

-----Original Message-----
From: Quigley, Dutch
Sent: Mon 11/5/2001 9:36 AM
To: Gosnell, Gerri
Cc:
Subject: RE: EDF Man's Excess

Gerri,

They David Early told me that you have already been contacted that the money would come over ?
They told me that it would.

Dutch

-----Original Message-----
From: Gosnell, Gerri
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Quigley, Dutch
Subject: RE: EDF Man's Excess

After the past week, I've forgotten what normal was!!  Thanks for your help!! Dutch, when you find out if the money is being transfered, would you please call me so that I can inform treasury?

Thanks!
gg
(281) 252-9892

-----Original Message-----
From: Quigley, Dutch
Sent: Mon 11/5/2001 9:19 AM
To: Gosnell, Gerri
Cc:
Subject: RE: EDF Man's Excess

Gerri ,

We , the financial natural gas desk , were under the impression that dealings with EDF Man are suppose to be conducted as
normal. I am calling EDF to find out why are money ahs not been wired as normal.

Dutch

-----Original Message-----
From: Gosnell, Gerri
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:11 AM
To: Quigley, Dutch
Cc: Reeves, Leslie; Hodges, Georganne; Whiting, Greg; Garcia, Paul
Subject: RE: EDF Man's Excess

Hi Dutch,

No, all he said was that he hadn't been given instructions as of yet (7:50).  I've just called him again (9:05), and he said that he was told that there would be no money transfered either way???

Thanks!
gg

-----Original Message-----
From: Quigley, Dutch
Sent: Mon 11/5/2001 8:45 AM
To: Gosnell, Gerri
Cc:
Subject: RE: EDF Man's Excess

Gerri ,

Did he say why he could not confirm the money transfer ?

Dutch

-----Original Message-----
From: Gosnell, Gerri
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 8:41 AM
To: Garcia, Paul; Hart, Reginald; Swisher, Nera; Hodges, Georganne; Quigley, Dutch; Reeves, Leslie; Whiting, Greg
Subject: EDF Man's Excess

Good Morning!

We have excess of $4,498,358.00 with EDF Man.  I called and talked with Paul this morning and he said that he could not confirm the wire for today as of yet.

I'll let you know asap.

Thanks!
gg


no topic, just updating everyone on where ENA is currently going and doing.
Come down and get free pizza.
Ben


Rhonda,  thanks for your call.  Here is the GISB draft.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Sorry for the late notice, but the cluster of people in suits are UO MBA
students who are visiting our office to learn more about Enron.

Happy Friday the 13th!


If you read Ray Alvarez's summary from yesterday evening, open the attached
Word document and read only the changes that we made to the summary since
receiving the final order, which was issued this afternoon.  Alan Comnes

The full order is available at: http://www.ferc.fed.us/electric/bulkpower.htm

SUMMARY OF FERC,S
ORDER ESTABLISHING PROSPECTIVE MITIGATION AND MONITORING PLAN FOR THE
CALIFORNIA WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MARKETS AND ESTABLISHING AN INVESTIGATION OF
PUBLIC UTILITY RATES IN WHOLESALE WESTERN ENERGY MARKETS
(Issued April 26, 2001)

Effective Date -- Price mitigation is effective May 29, 2001.  (ISO needs to
have its day-ahead proxy price ready on 5/28)

Physical Withholding -- To prevent physical withholding, the plan will
require sellers with PGA's to offer all their available power in real time to
the extent not scheduled in bilateral trade.  All California generators, even
those not subject to FERC price regulation, will be required to sell into the
ISO's real time market as a condition of their use of the ISO's interstate
transmission lines. Hydroelectric facilities will be exempted. (This
requirement to provide power is for all hours (24/7) for 1yr)

Price Mitigation - The plan will establish a single market clearing price
auction for the real time market.  During Stage 1, 2 and 3 emergencies in the
ISO's real time market, each generator (other than hydro) with a
participating generator agreement is required to offer all available power
and bid its marginal cost based on the generator's heat curve, emission
rates, gas costs and emission costs, plus $2/MWh for O&M.  The gas cost will
be the average daily cost of gas for all delivery points in California;
emissions are to be based on Cantor Fitzgerald Environmental Brokerage
Services.  The ISO will publish by 8:00 am, the gas and emission figures to
be used for the next day in any hour where an emergency is declared. These
figures (for the next day) will be based on the prior day's Gas Daily and
Cantor Fitzgerald data. A single market clearing price is determined in real
time for all generators.  Highest bid sets the clearing price.  Each
gas-fired generator must file with FERC and the ISO within 5 days, on a
confidential basis, heat and emission rates for each generating unit.  The
ISO will use these rates to calculate a marginal cost for each generator,
including maintenance and operating costs.  Generators that submit bids at or
below the market clearing price will not be subject to refund liability.
(Although the following qualification is made: &However, all public utility
rates will be subject to refund for violations of the conditions imposed on
market-based rates, discussed infra.8  Presumably this has to do with
anomalous bidding behavior.)  In the event a generator submits a bid higher
than the proxy price, the generator must, within 7 days of the end of each
month, file a report with FERC and the ISO justifying its price.  FERC
explicitly acknowledges that some units may have gas costs that exceed the
&all delivery point8 index it has adopted. FERC has 60 days to review/act.
No opportunity costs in real time.  Marketers are not held to any generator
cost standard but must be prepared to justify bid at purchased cost based on
specific purchases or portfolio with no opportunity cost.

Underscheduling Penalites -- FERC acknowledges that the there is a pending
request to revoke the current underscheduling penalty but indicates that it
is still in place.  Thus, although it may be advantageous to wait to buy
power in R/T at capped prices, doing so may make the scheduling coordinator
subject to the currently effective $100/MWh penalty.  See p. 20 of the FERC
order.

New Generation --  New generation is NOT exempted from the Commission,s price
mitigation measures.

Demand Response -- Beginning June 1, only public utility load serving
entities must submit demand side bids to curtail load and identify the load
to be curtailed under those bids.  FERC is attempting to make the demand
curve more price responsive.  (This requirement is in effect for all hours
(24/7))

Outages -- PGA generators will coordinate planned outages and report forced
outages The ISO is required to make a tariff filing within 15 days of the
order proposing a mechanism for coordination and control of outages,
including periodic reports to the Commission.

Term - Order expires one year from date of issuance.

RTO Filing - California ISO and two Utilities must make RTO filing by June 1
or Order lapses with no further effect.  The RTO filing is to be consistent
with the characteristics and functions in Order No. 2000.

ISO Reporting - On September 14, 2001, ISO must file a status report on how
things are working and how much generation has been built.  Comments are due
in 15 days.  Quarterly reports thereafter.

Revocation of Market Based Rate Authority and Refunds - The market based rate
authority of all public utilities is conditioned on (1) no physical withhold
of capacity, and (2) no inappropriate bidding behavior.  Inappropriate
bidding behavior includes bidding unrelated to known characteristics of the
generation unit or without an input cost basis or bidding not based on unit
behavior.  An increased bid based on increased demand could apparently be
inappropriate.  In addition, "hockey stick" bids are expressly prohibited
(i.e.  bidding 95% at marginal cost and 5% at a much higher level).  Other
prohibited bidding practices identified include: pricing a single unit much
higher than other units in a supplier portfolio and changes in bids due to
increased scarcity rather than changes in generator costs.

West-Wide Section 206 Investigation  ) Opens a section 206 investigation
concerning the J&R of wholesale power in the WSCC other than sales to the
CAISO market.    FERC requests comments on the scope and nature of price
mitigation.  However its proposal is that refund conditions apply only in
real time (markets for power less than 24 hours in advance of R/T) spot
markets when contingency within a control area falls below 7% within a
control area.    FERC is attempting to mirror the rules applied in
California.  Comments are due in 10 days on the 206 investigations.  Although
it is still formulating its price mitigation plan for the non-California PNW,
the FERC sets the refund effective date is 60 days from publication of the
Order.

NOx Limits in California --  Must sell requirements do not apply if a unit is
prohibited from running by law.  However, it appears that incurring fines
does not overcome the must sell requirement- just include the fines as part
of the price bid.  Also if NOx is limited, may seek to show that generation
would have been sold elsewhere or at different times for determining price.

Surcharge to pay past amount due -- Comments are due in 30 days on (1)
whether FERC should require the ISO to surcharge parties for payment into an
escrow account to pay past costs and (2) the effect this surcharge would have
on the PG&E bankruptcy filing.

Treatment of the CAISO,s Market Stabilization Plan (MSP). The FERC rejects
the CAISO,s MSP saying that FERC,s plan for market mitigation is sufficient.
It expressly rejects CAISO,s plan to create a day-ahead and hour-ahead energy
markets are expressly reject and tells CAISO to stop actions to implement
software changes to effectuate such markets.  Unfortunately, it does not
expressly reject CAISO,s plan to cut exports.  In general, no mention was
made as to issue of exports of power from California although the statement
that CAISO must become a real RTO would support the notion that CAISO must
honor firm schedules on its system..

Recap of Dates Identified in the Order
? Issue date: 4/26/01
? Heat rate emission filing from generators due: 5 days (5/1/01)
? Comments due on WSCC-wide price mitigation: 10 days (5/6/01)
? ISO Tariff filing due: 15 days (5/11/01)
? Comments on ISO Tariff due: 5 days thereafter (5/16/01)
? Comments on whether Commission should allow a premium to recover unpaid
generator bills: 5/30/01
? Effective date of proxy prices: 5/29/01
? Demand responsive bids from load serving entities: 6/1/01
? Refund effective date begins:  60 days after publishing in Federal Register
(late June?)
? First ISO quarterly report: 9/14/01
? Comments on first ISO quarterly report: 15 days thereafter (9/29/01)
? Plan terminates: 4/26/02

RA  & GAC


Thanks Tana.  You're a life saver.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Maria Garza and I checked.  We only see the two trades (TAGG numbers) you reference, none other.  It is our opinion that these trades represent all of the financial GAS positions.  Note that these two trades ended w/ the Feb02 settlement period.

I cannot speak to power or any other commodity.  However, I can provide that Credit Agg didn't show any position exposure for Tri State, which we think is consistent considering there is no existing forward [gas] market price exposure to Tri State.

In summary, my opinion is that there are no other positions.  However, only Beth Apollo's group can provide a conclusive answer.  Hope this helps.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Monday, March 11, 2002 3:09 PM
To:	Dicarlo, Louis
Cc:	Panus, Stephanie; Bailey, Susan
Subject:	Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc. ("Tri-State")

Louis:

Just a reminder that ENA received a letter from Tri-State last month and you are going to verify that Deal Nos. YB 5708.1 and 5833.1 are the only active financial deals with ENA.  If you can confirm, then we can indicate on the Master Log that Tri-State has actually terminated all outstanding trades effective as of 2/27/02.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/26/2000
08:22 AM ---------------------------

Stinson Gibner
07/25/2000 05:38 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Offsite Agenda - Stinson


I think this may be the junior trader your are looking for. If you don't want
him -- I will certainly interview him for fundamentals, but I think he is
over qualified
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT on 09/01/2001
14:30 ---------------------------

"michalon" <michalon@math.uchicago.edu> on 09/01/2001 13:53:24
To: <jfraser@ect.enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Informational interview

Sir Fraser,

In June 2001 I will graduate from the University of Chicago with a Master of
Science degree in Financial Mathematics.
I have graduated from the IFP (French Institute of Petroleum) Engineering
School in Paris with a Master of Science degree in Petroleum Economics.

I am very interested in a career in Energy markets and I would like to know
more about your activities in the Energy markets.

Would it be possible to schedule an informational interview at your
convenience ?

I am attaching my resume to give you some background about myself.
I thank you for your consideration and I hope to hear form you soon.

David A. Michalon
The University of Chicago
Program on Financial Mathematics

 - RESUME.doc


Please set up some time with Linda.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/17/2001
11:39 AM ---------------------------

Norm Spalding@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/16/2001 02:26 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Linda Uselman/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: EES

Steve, I'm not sure if you remember me, but I was the gentleman that talked
to you at the Floor Meeting on April 18th for ETS personnel.

If you remember, I mentioned that some of our engineering people had
transferred to EES last year and that now they all want back due to the mass
confusion in that organization such as billings being done on Excel
spreadsheets, no one being allowed to talk to other groups, etc. etc.

Today, one of these employees, Linda Uselman, paid me a visit to inform me of
her resignation from EES.  I mentioned to Linda about my discussion with you
and she said she would very much like to share with you what is going on in
EES.

Linda was one of our best employees.  While we hated to see her go to EES, we
thought this was for the good of Enron.  Now we see that everyone lost on
this deal.

Thanks, Norm


Hasan,

We have been asked to retrieve some information to assist us in our decision making regarding a tariff filing on TW. We would like to see the Final Operational Capacity vs. Final Scheduled volume by day from Oct. 2000 to Oct. 2001. for these groups.

I/B Link   Group      28
San Jaun Group     26
West of Thoreau    24

We also need to know when these groups were allocated during this same time frame by day. We would like to have all this information by next Wednesday, November 7th if possible. If not, please let me know as soon as possible. The information only needs to be sent to me to reconfigure. Thank you.

Terry Kowalke


This was an article written in response to the piece by Prof Krugman in the
New York Times several weeks ago. I know that Foster spent some time on the
phone with Steve and Mark before writing the article.
----- Forwarded by Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT on 06/26/2001 08:40 AM -----

	Dan Dorland
	06/08/2001 08:54 AM

		 To: Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT, Jan Wilson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Jeff Borg/TOR/ECT@ECT,
Dave Ellis/TOR/ECT@ECT, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Garrett Tripp/TOR/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Economics 90210

Economics 90210

Peter Foster
National Post
Dumb ol' Dubya. President Bush and his administration have been taken to task
this week by U.S. liberal economists and media sophisticates for being so
naive as to suggest that California's problems won't be solved by price
controls. That, sniffed last Sunday's New York Times, was just "Econ 101."
What the President needed was a lesson in Econ 90210, presented by the
Department of Sarah Polley-Sci.
The bad news for Californians is that the shift of power to the democrats in
the federal Senate means that price controls become more likely, and with
them more blackouts. Meanwhile, the real causes of the California crisis -- a
screwed-up deregulation process exacerbated by environmentalist opposition to
new state power plants -- are buried beneath screams about gouging and
profiteering, and calls for an anti-corporate witch hunt.
The call for price caps has allegedly been boosted by the support of a "gang
of ten" economists including Alfred Kahn, "the architect of airline
deregulation under President Carter." But price caps don't work. As President
Bush noted after meeting California Governor Gray Davis last week, "[P]rice
caps do nothing to reduce demand and they do nothing to increase supply."
However, according to another liberal economist, Princeton's Paul Krugman, we
shouldn't worry about prices because this summer will see blackouts anyway,
and in the longer term, new supplies are on the way via new plants, whose
arrival will somehow be magically impervious to the prospect of controls.
Apart from being terrible economics, Mr. Krugman's attitude is even more
objectionable politics. At least he is frank about the reasoning behind his
support for price caps. They are intended to keep money out of the hands of
power suppliers. Meanwhile, he pursues the conceit -- disproven time and time
again -- that prices can be fine-tuned by bureaucrats to a level that will be
"just enough" to call forth the right amount of new power. "Nobody," he
writes, "has proposed capping prices at a level that would prevent power
producers from making extraordinarily high profits; why should this reduce
the power supply?"
Mr. Krugman suggests that students who go beyond naive old Econ 101 learn
that "strictly speaking, the standard argument against price controls applies
only to competitive industry. A price ceiling imposed on a monopolist need
not cause a shortage; indeed, price controls on a monopolist can actually
lead to higher output." This happens when the guy in the top hat throws up
his hands and says "No point in me holding out for higher prices now that you
clever wonks have capped them, so just come in and take what you want. And
which way is it to the airport?"
Professor Krugman does have the good grace to note that "That's not an
argument you want to use too often." In fact, the argument is dangerous
nonsense. There is no "monopoly" supplier of energy to California (although
many state politicians have called for a government takeover of the
"commanding heights" of electricity generation, . la Lenin). Moreover, both
the economic and political arguments against price caps remain as valid as
ever. Price spikes require a buyer as well as a seller. To hold down prices
means that there will be excess demand and that constrained supply will have
to be allocated among competing uses by politicians and bureaucrats -- as it
was under the system of natural gas price and transportation controls that
brought the United States to crisis back in 1977. Meanwhile, the impact of
such essentially arbitrary controls goes well beyond their immediate skewing
of market signals. They damage the entire investment climate by raising the
spectre of further whimsical intervention, and by establishing an effective
ceiling to profitability without any corresponding limits to losses, except
for those with political pull. Professor Krugman asserts that "generating
capacity is being added so quickly that the industry will soon face a glut."
If that happens, we may be sure that Mr. Krugman will not be calling for
price supports.
Mr. Krugman has been a leader among the baying pack that suggests that
California's problems are all due to market "manipulation" by big energy
suppliers. He concludes his display of economic obfuscation with the snide
assertion that President Bush's "knee-jerk ideologue" advisers may be "so
close personally to energy industry executives that they believe that
whatever is good for Enron is good for America." The presence in California
of Enron, the world's largest energy trader, has increased supplies to the
state, but according to California's attorney general, democrat Bill Lockyer,
Enron's head, Kenneth Lay, should be sent to jail. After all, he did raise
campaign funds for George Bush. And price caps and jail for business
executives somehow go together nicely.


FYI - I called in for the meeting this morning but no one else ever
connected.  Sorry.  I have nothing new to report.  I'll be in S.P.  next week
for a few days.  I'll try to get on your calendar.  Thanks.  Sara

P. S.  Happy Thanksgiving!


*************************************************************
HAVE YOU QUALIFIED FOR FREE ELECTRONICS?
*************************************************************

TABLE OF CONTENTS
etown.com Promotion Ends December 15th
How Does It Work / Bonus Miles
Earn Up to $1,500 in Free Electronics

___________________________________________________________________
ETOWN.COM PROMOTION ENDS DECEMBER 15th

Remember, you must sign up with a MyAlaskaAir account by December 15 to
qualify for the Alaska Airlines etown.com promotion.

If you have flown or are planning on flying Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air
between October 1, 2000 and December 15, 2000 you could earn up to $1,500
in free electronics from etown.com, the premier online consumer
electronics source.

___________________________________________________________________
HOW DOES IT WORK?  EASY.

1) Sign up with a new MyAlaskaAir account at www.alaskaair.com  before
December 15. A MyAlaskaAir account speeds you through alaskaair.com when
you want to book and purchase online. It allows you to securely and
conveniently store preference information such as favorite destinations,
seating choice, contact information, even your billing credit card if you
choose. It's free, takes only minutes, AND you'll earn 1,000 Mileage Plan
BONUS MILES just for signing up. Make sure you include your Alaska
Airlines Mileage Plan number to qualify for this promotion.

2) Fly Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air between October 1, 2000 and December
15, 2000 and earn miles on your Mileage Plan account as you would
normally. Qualifying flights made before you sign up with a MyAlaskaAir
account will count and it doesn't matter how you book or purchase your
tickets (you don't have to purchase online to qualify). Every segment you
earn will count toward your etown.com certificate award amount. The
etown.com certificates will be emailed to you in mid February.

Every round-trip you fly is at least two segments, so frequent flyers can
rack up free electronics fast. BUT REMEMBER, no matter how many Mileage
Plan flight miles you earn, you have to sign up with a new MyAlaskaAir
account (and include your Alaska Airlines Mileage Plan number) by December
15, 2000 to qualify!

___________________________________________________________________
EARN UP TO $1,500 IN FREE ELECTRONICS

This is how many dollars-off etown.com merchandise you can earn:

Alaska or Horizon Segments / etown.com credit

3-5 / $25
6-10 / $50
11-15 / $150
16-20 / $300
21-30 / $600
31+ / $1,500

So, get that MyAlaskaAir account, rack up Mileage Plan miles, and in
February you can shop for your dream electronics item. Go to
www.alaskaair.com for full details. Don't forget to visit www.etown.com to
start planning your purchase!

==============================================================
You are receiving this message today because you subscribed to our Email
Notification Service. While we'd be pleased to continue to tell you about
our great products and prices, you can unsubscribe by visiting our Web
site at http://www2.alaskaair.com/listserv/webmail.asp . Please do not
respond to this message. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 09/05/2000
12:45 PM ---------------------------

"hollyw" <hollyw@email.msn.com> on 08/26/2000 10:55:20 AM
To: "Stacy Warren" <swarre02@coair.com>, "Sheri Thomas"
<Sheri.Thomas@enron.com>, "Rochelle Smith" <rochelle@waterengineers.com>,
"Raymond Paterson" <ray_paterson@hotmail.com>, "Nicol, Gary" <nicolg@bp.com>,
"Lori Horrocks" <loroks@yahoo.com>, "KRISTI GIRON" <KRISTI.GIRON@cfisd.net>,
"John Schmitz" <jschm@telxon.com>, "Jim Miller" <jraggie1@pdq.net>, "Janine
Gregor" <janine.gregor@talk21.com>, "Debbie \(Home\)" <jamoma3@cs.com>,
"Darron C Giron" <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Nuff Said !

?
----- Original Message -----
From: dkerr2
To: hollyw@email.msn.com
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2000 11:10 AM
Subject: Fw: Nuff Said !

Oh how true!
----- Original Message -----
From: Amanda M.  Hissey
To: Trace  Torrence ; Tip  Williams ; Randy Eddy ; Paul Quinn ; Matt Clark ;
Dan Kerr ; Christy  Geaslen ; Bob ; Ashley  Williamson
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 9:01 AM
Subject: FW: Nuff Said !

?
-----Original Message-----
From: jimreniers [mailto:jimreniers@msn.com]
Sent:  Friday, August 25, 2000 8:57 AM
To: Bowman, Bill; Trish Bullard; Davis  bob HOME; Davis, Bob L; Gillen
Andrew; Hissy, Mandy; Lamm,Dennis; Lamm, Miles;  Macdonald, Don;
MGuinnSr@aol.com; Moore,  Pat; Ann Parker; Pfleghar,Dave; PAUL SRO; Torance
Trace
Subject: Fw:  Nuff Said !

?
Subject: Fw: Nuff Said !

?
 - species2.htm


A follow up - I understand the price of the DuPont / Marubeni deal was somewhere between ?4 - ?6.50 per tonne of CO2.


Thanks for the update.  I think it shows how starved for new products these
exchanges are.  I'm not a fan of teaming up with these kinds of entities.
It's unclear what they bring, and how does this help us?  what do you think?

Jeff

Thor Lien
11/24/2000 01:16 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Weather: meeting with HEX

Jeff

We have had some meetings with the Helsinki Stock Exchange, and they are very
eager to link to us on Weather.
What's your general opinion about linking EOL to other Exchanges when it
comes to Weather contracts?

Thor
---------------------- Forwarded by Thor Lien/OSL/ECT on 24/11/2000 08:11
---------------------------

Sami Tenngren
16/11/2000 15:31
To: Thor Lien/OSL/ECT@ECT, Bjarne Schieldrop/OSL/ECT@ECT
cc: Preben Richter/OSL/ECT@ECT

Subject: Weather: meeting with HEX

Meeting with the Helsinki Stock Exchange (HEX) went well and the future
opportunities for both parties were discussed. They were very eager to list
HDD swaps (and options at the Exchange) and this should be done by this
coming spring.

Below some bullet points from the meeting:

"deadline is spring
Enron as one of the market makers
They would need our help in formulating the product descriptions for the
local authorities in Finland
They are looking at listing a few points in Finland to start with and then
maybe adding other Nordic / European points
They will provide clearing services for the products
They will also market the products and give training to institutions as well
as private investors/hedgers

Next steps:

They will contact other players regarding the weather derivatives. However,
it seems that they see us as "the one" in this market and therefore would
like us to help them out in the beginning.

They will get back to us during this month to give us an update and outline
the future process in more detail.

How do you feel about this? Are we interested in becoming a market maker?
I feel that it would a great opportunity for us i.e. increased liquidity and
they would do most of the marketing and training. They are also in a co-op
with Eurex, which could open more doors for us in the continental market.

--------------
They have also to some extent investigated the possibility to list Real
Estate derivatives at the Exchange. The way to do this would be to construct
an index based on the closed deals in the real estate market. There could be
separate indeces for the different part of the country or just one common
one. Is this something we could do as well?? It would be a good instrument
for institutions with large real estate portfolios as well as private
investors (those saving for a house or the ones owning real estate).


Great job--Mike and I want to reiterate that this kind of business is
absolutely core to our market, and this type of innovation leads to other
businesses.  If you guys need anything, please get in touch.  Mike and I
should be in London shortly, and are excited to learn more.

Regards

Mike and Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000
08:57 AM ---------------------------

	From:  George McClellan                           08/07/2000 08:47 AM

To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Sea freight: 1st trade done today

As info.
 We are working to keep the bid / ask spreads as narrow as possible for each
of our EOL markets - domestic and international coal, vessel freights and
emissions.  Volumes for coal and emissions are already up, and freight should
be a rapidly developing market.

---------------------- Forwarded by George McClellan/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000
08:40 AM ---------------------------

John Sherriff
08/04/2000 10:39 AM
To: Pierre Aury/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Chris
Connelly/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Sea freight: 1st trade done today

Pierre

Congratulations - this is a fabulous market for us to work.

John

	Enron Europe

	From:  Pierre Aury                           04/08/2000 14:08

To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Chris
Connelly/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Sea freight: 1st trade done today

hello John
we started to work on the idea of putting freight swaps on eol during fh may.
we were ready technically early july, cleared all legal hurdles end july,
went live on the 1st of august and did our first trade today . and guess what
the customer is so enthusiastic that he ll make us great advertisement . this
is the first time ever a shipping transaction has  been made principal to
principal 100pct  through an electronic media.
fyg we are quoting 2 contracts based on cape size vessels (cargo size 150 000
tons ) on coal routes . one is south africa to rotterdam and the other one is
colombia to rotterdam. these routes are  the main routes of the international
coal group portfolio.
in terms of volume what we are putting on eol every day is more than what is
contracted on the normal otc market on a monthly basis.
in terms of spreads existing otc market is working with 0.75 to 1 usd  when
our spread is now 0.20 usd.

in september/october  we will increase the number of contracts available to
include smaller vessels and other types transaction (time charter in addition
to the present contract which are "voyage" type transactions)
.
pierre aury

--------------------- Forwarded by Pierre Aury/LON/ECT on 04/08/2000 13:44
---------------------------

	Enron Europe

	From:  Chris Connelly                           04/08/2000 11:44

To: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stuart
Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT
(bcc: Pierre Aury/LON/ECT)

Subject: Sea freight: 1st trade done today

Fyi,

We have just traded our first sea freight contract today with Bocimar BV as
the counterpart.  Bocimar is the biggest Cape size vessel operator in the
world and they called after the trade to let me know that they think the
system is great and will be using it to trade regularly.

Regards

Chris Connelly


I will be at an EIM Forms Review offsite this afternoon beginning at 1 at the
Doubletree Hotel.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


We might want to forward this email version for their review first.  I would think that their attorney's might have a few comments.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miles, Andrew
Sent:	Friday, August 10, 2001 11:21 AM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	RE: CA for Powder River Energy

This looks great Gerald!  Thanks.  What next?  Are you going to make official copies?

Andrew

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Friday, August 10, 2001 10:05 AM
To:	Miles, Andrew
Subject:	CA for Powder River Energy

Attached is a draft CA.  Let me know if you have any questions.

 << File: PowderRiverCA.doc >>


We have received 2 applications for membership approval for the next
executive committee call on Wednesday, March 7.

Please let me know if you know SAFECO Corporation, an insurance company.

Thanks.
Mary

Primary Emerging
Banco Itau S/A  - this is our first Brazilian bank member

Subscriber
SAFECO Corporation - Insurance company


Below is an outline of the materials that each of you are responsible for
developing for Ken's briefing book.  Please have the latest  draft of
materials to me by Friday at 3:00 pm.  I will be giving Steve Kean a draft
briefing book at that time so that he can review it over the weekend.  We'll
have feedback to people by Monday morning and can finalize the book by Monday
evening.

Sections by Tab

Most recent update/backgrounder  Jeff Dasovich
Legislative Matrix     Miyung Buster
Edison Deal Overview    Jeff Dasovich
Total Solution Proposal    Jim/Robert/Jennifer
Most Recent Polling Data   Mark Palmer
Press Responses/Talking Points  Mark/Karen/Peggy


We are planning a party!

It has been a while since the group has had a party,
and my daughter is going to be a year old.  So we are
planning a party for November 11th, and Vandhana
and I would like to invite everyone in Research and
their family.

As yet we do not have the venue fixed, but please
keep November 11 (Sunday) free.

Please RSVP so that we can plan on the numbers.

Regards,
Sandeep.

******************************************************************************


AGA for 11/10/00 is -6 W/D


It,s not too late to tell us what you think about your work experience at
Enron and Enron Transportation Services, and what we can do to help make it
better.

To date, nearly 27% of all ETS employees have completed The Pulse survey.
For those of you who have completed the survey, thank you for taking the time
to tell us what,s on your mind.

We,d still like to hear from those employees who have not completed the
survey. Between now and Friday, Oct. 27, please access The Pulse survey via
survey.enron.com to share your Enron work experiences. It would be great to
get 100% participation from ETS employees.

Your survey responses are confidential and your comments can bring
improvements to ETS.

Thanks, in advance, for your participation in The Pulse.


Kenneth Lay has approved the attached expense report.


Heather,

I am forwarding this message to 2 groups in Enron that may be interested.

Vince

"Heather Thorne" <hethorne@wharton.upenn.edu> on 04/26/2001 08:55:56 PM
To: "Christie Patrick" <christie.patrick@enron.com>, "Vince Kaminsky"
<vkamins@enron.com>
cc: "Greg Hunt home" <gregoryhunt@home.com>
Subject: Recruiting for weather risk management group

Dear Vince and Christie,

?

I hope that you are both well, and are ready for the onset of summer in
Houston!? I was disappointed that I was not able to see you at the final
Tiger Team presentations last month due to a family emergency.? I hope that
the teams, analyses will be helpful to your work, and echo their appreciation
of your involvement and support.

?

I am writing with a question regarding recruiting for Enron,s weather risk
management group. ?My boyfriend, Greg Hunt, is currently seeking
opportunities to combine his background in meteorology (MS and 2 years of
research at Lawrence Livermore Nat,l Lab) and an MBA in finance and
information technology.? I began thinking about Enron,s work in weather
derivatives, and realized that there could possibly be a great fit there.

?

I have copied Greg on this message, and would appreciate any suggestions you
can offer regarding opportunities in this group. ?Thank you very much!

?

Best regards,

?

Heather

?

?

?

?

Heather N. Thorne

MBA Candidate, 2001

The Wharton School at University of Pennsylvania

2516 Pine Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 545-3022

?


SK - I've printed these out.  mm

My (just over half a page) summaries of the main items are attached as
requested (in two separate documents, for first and second halves of 2000.)

Maureen McVicker@ENRON
01/04/2001 05:52 PM
To: Bill Donovan/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie
Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lindolfo Ernesto
Paixao/SA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike G Smith/NA/Enron@Enron,
Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Peter
Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Geriann Warner/NA/Enron@Enron, Nina Garcia/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernadette
Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Melinda
McCarty/Corp/Enron@Enron, Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marcia A
Linton/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: 2000 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

REMINDER:

Your list of accomplishments are due today.  Please email your response to
Steve Kean and copy me.

For those of you who have already responded - thank you.

Assistants:  please remind your people that these lists are due today.

Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 01/04/2001 10:42 AM -----

	Maureen McVicker
	12/22/2000 03:47 PM

		 To: Bill Donovan/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie
Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lindolfo Ernesto
Paixao/SA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike G Smith/NA/Enron@Enron,
Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Peter
Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: 2000 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Steve Kean would like each of you to send him a list of your accomplishments
for 2000.

If you have already provided the list to Steve, please disregard this email.

DUE DATE:  Close of business, Thurs., Jan. 4


Call me Hussy!  I got questions.


Stinson,

No problem. I shall forward the letter to HR
to enter this information into the company's records.

I hope you will have good time and come back with fresh dose
of energy.

Vince

Stinson Gibner
08/23/2000 09:08 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Request for Leave

Vince,

After eight years of working for Enron, I would like to take some additional
time off.   If possible, I would like to take three weeks of leave without
pay, beginning September 25 and continuing through October 13th, 2000.

Thank you,

Stinson Gibner


Looks good,  please remove  "Draft"  from the first page prior to execution.

Thanks!
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Find attached February's production data.


Paul,

Just thought that I would let you know that the Red Rock deal which we were discussing yesterday does have an offsetting deal with OneOK, the supplier correct?  Anyways, the P&L impact on those two deals taken together is 0.  So, I am still looking into finding an offsetting Burlington Wic deal for Grigsby's WIC position.

Carole C, Frank
Enron Net Works

713.345.3960 work
713.446.9307 cell


Dorothy -

I spoke to Rebeka this morning regarding that administrative position.  I'm
not quite sure how it went but I want to thank you for speaking to her on my
behalf.  Although she is looking to fill this position within the next two
weeks, she mentioned that if this didn't work out for me that she would
forward my resume to the HR Recruiter, Dianne White.  And if I may ask,  just
keep me in your prayers.  Thanks again.

Dana


Meeting to run through EBS Trading Support staff for cross calibration.


-----Original Message-----
From: Whitt, Mark
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:11 PM
To: Staab, Theresa; Bierbach, Brian; Lucci, Paul T.; Bump, Dan J.;
Tycholiz, Barry; Felling, Amy
Subject: FW: How Our Economy and Others Progress (Using Cows As An
Example)

Make sure you read all the way through to Enron.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tycholiz, Barry
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:47 AM
To: Whitt, Mark
Subject: FW: How Our Economy and Others Progress (Using Cows As An
Example)

for your review. BT

-----Original Message-----
From: Fildes, David [mailto:fildesd@phibro.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:10 AM
To: Cross, Darren; Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: FW: How Our Economy and Others Progress (Using Cows As An
Example)

In spite of it all, this is humourous... I suggest you do not forward this
internally however...

DF

-----Original Message-----
From: Fisher, Billy
Sent: 01 November 2001 15:02
To: Fildes, David
Subject: FW: How Our Economy and Others Progress (Using Cows As An
Example)

Feudalism
You have two cows.
Your lord takes some of the milk.

----------

Fascism
You have two cows.
The government takes both, hires you to take care of them and sells you the
milk.

----------

Pure Communism
You have two cows.
Your neighbours help take care of them and you all share the milk.

----------

Applied Communism
You have two cows.
You must take care of them, but the government takes all the milk.

----------

Totalitarianism
You have two cows.
The government takes them both and denies they ever existed. Milk is banned.

----------

Pure Democracy
You have two cows.
You and your neighbours decide who gets the milk.

----------

Representative Democracy
You have two cows.
Your neighbours pick someone to tell you who gets the milk.

Mexican Democracy
You have two cows.
The government takes both and drafts you into the army.

----------

European Democracy
You have two cows.
The EU commission decides which regulations for feeding and milking apply.
If
there aren't any, they invent some. They pay you not to milk the cows.
They take both cows, shoot one, milk the other and pour the milk down the
drain.
They then require you to fill out forms accounting for the missing cows.

----------

American Democracy
The government promises to give you two cows, if you vote for it.
After the election, the president is impeached for speculating in cow
futures.
The press dubs the affair "cowgate," but supports the president.
The cows sue you for breach of contract.
Your legal bills exceed your annual income.
You settle out of court and declare bankruptcy.

----------

Capitalism
You have two cows.
You sell one and buy a bull.
Your herd multiplies, and the economy grows. You sell them and retire on the
income.

----------

Enron Venture Capitalism
You have two cows.
You sell three of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of
credit
opened by your brother-in-law at the bank, then execute a debt/equity swap
with
an associated general offer so that you get all four cows back, with a tax
exemption for five cows.  The milk rights of the six cows are transferred
via an
intermediary to a Cayman Island company secretly owned by the majority
shareholder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed
company.
The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option on one
more.

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************
The UK firms of Arthur Andersen, Andersen Corporate Finance and Andersen
Private
Client Services are authorised by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in
England and Wales to carry on investment business.  For each firm, a list of
partners is available at 180 Strand, London, WC2R 1BL (principal place of
business).

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender
by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not
consent
to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and
other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of
my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.


Start Date: 1/11/02; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011102.txt


An update on Locke Liddell's activities with Ecogas.
Received: from bpmcweb.bracepatt.com ([172.16.1.17]) by po.bracepatt.com;
Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:28:54 -0600
Received: FROM mail2.lockeliddell.com BY bpmcweb.bracepatt.com ; Mon Feb 21
09:32:07 2000
X-Proxy: keymaster.bracepatt.com protected by CyberGuard
Received: from daex01.lockeliddell.com (daex01.lockeliddell.com [10.8.2.50])
by mail2.lockeliddell.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA09252; Mon, 21 Feb
2000 09:33:05 -0600
Received: by daex01.lockeliddell.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
id <FCXPV5V7>; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:32:47 -0600
Message-ID:
<A1B4C8FB2C95D211A5A90008C7F4872401C443D5@houex01.lockeliddell.com>
From: "Pieringer, Stan" <SPieringer@lockeliddell.com>
To: "'rstephens@bracepatt.com'" <rstephens@bracepatt.com>
Cc: "'jerrel@rmisp.com'" <jerrel@rmisp.com>
Subject: Ecogas misc.
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:15:24 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

            Rob, I have  heard nothing from DTE Biomass since I sent them
the schedule to the proposed MOU January 21.   I had previously sent it to
them January 6.    In fact, I haven't heard anything from them since they
got our money before Christmas.   I will follow up in the next few days
unless there has been some development I don't know about.

            Also, wanted to report that we were asked to help with a $5,000
writ of execution on Ecogas property in Austin.   Some suit in JP Court in
Travis County over a debt by the Company's former subsidiary Ecogas
Cryogenics Inc. in Washington state.  The Company answered without counsel
but then apparently forgot about it.  The constable was at the door when we
got the call on Thursday.  We are in touch trying to work it out.

Regards,

            Stan Pieringer
            Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP
            600 Travis Street, 35th Floor
            Houston, Texas 77002
            voice: 713/226-1224
            fax: 713/223-3717
            spieringer@lockeliddell.com <mailto:spieringer@lockeliddell.com>


I just got back from the greenhouse gas meeting.  The meeting was good. But you will be retired before that program is worth anything as far as a good trading program is concerned.

John, said he talked with you on the phone about the b-plan.  I added a table of contents, and if John gives me anything to add I will.

I am going home (LA) tomorrow so I might work half a day.

-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Trevor
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Taylor, Michael E
Subject: RE:

Nah. I'm gonna keep it my little secret.
 Trevor Woods

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Michael E <Michael.E.Taylor@ENRON.com>
To: Woods, Trevor <Trevor.Woods@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Nov 20 09:22:09 2001
Subject: RE:

Just to keep up good relations.  I told him we would get back with him.  Please let me know if you do not call him.

-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Trevor
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:44 AM
To: Taylor, Michael E
Subject: RE:

I suppose. Nothing to tell him though.
 Trevor Woods

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Michael E <Michael.E.Taylor@ENRON.com>
To: Woods, Trevor <Trevor.Woods@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Nov 20 07:37:23 2001
Subject: RE:

I put it in my original message below.  It is 832-496-0123.  Tom Hartman with San Joaquin Power. I imagine a natural.  Are you going to call him today?

-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Trevor
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 6:15 PM
To: Taylor, Michael E
Subject: RE:

Is he a broker or a natural?  I've heard about the company through cantor. He's not going anywhere.  Everyone says they want to move fast then the jack around. You got his number?
 Trevor Woods

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Michael E <Michael.E.Taylor@ENRON.com>
To: Woods, Trevor <Trevor.Woods@ENRON.com>
Sent: Mon Nov 19 17:06:19 2001
Subject: RE:

I didn't want to talk price with him.  He saw our ERCs (that we just sold for $15,000) on website and called Kevin's line.  I was told to pick up the phone.  I told him somebody would call him back.  Either you or I would if you didn't want to call him.  He wanted to move fast, and he mentioned he used brokers in the past.

If none are out, I think we should call and tell him.

-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Trevor
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 4:00 PM
To: Taylor, Michael E
Subject: RE:

Who is that and how do you know him?  I haven't seen any come on since we sold some. What was his bid?
 Trevor Woods

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Michael E <Michael.E.Taylor@ENRON.com>
To: Woods, Trevor <Trevor.Woods@ENRON.com>
CC: Massey II, John <John.Massey@ENRON.com>
Sent: Mon Nov 19 15:56:46 2001
Subject: RE:

I just spoke with Tom Hartman of San Joaquin Power.  He wants up to 20 HGA NOx ERCS.  I told him I would have to check.  He wants to move quickly.  His number is 832-496-0123.  I know we do not have any, but I wanted to see if an arb was possible before we tell him we do not have any.


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001 03:22 PM ---------------------------

"SoRelle, Andrea L" <ASoRelle@h-s.com> on 05/10/2001 02:39:15 PM
To:	"'Amy Clemons'" <amy.clemons@enron.com>, "'Anne'" <anneyows@hotmail.com>, "'Brad'" <bradf@inqueststaffing.com>, "'Caroline'" <carolinehead@hotmail.com>, "'Karen'" <k1p1@aol.com>, "'kriscameron@deloitte.com'" <kriscameron@deloitte.com>, "'Marcy'" <marcyrinehart@hotmail.com>, "'Maggie work'" <mbeery@hillandknowlton.com>, "'Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com'" <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>, "'Rachel'" <rachelarriola@yahoo.com>, "'Ritter, Robert H.'" <rhritter@utmb.edu>, "'Tara Levinthal'" <tlevinthal@aol.com>, "Pechersky, Svetlana" <SPechersky@h-s.com>, "Cohlmeyer, Lisa M" <LCohlmeyer@h-s.com>, "'Shirley Elliott'" <shirley.s.elliott@citicorp.com>, "'Holly Korman'" <holly@layfam.com>, "'MATTOSO, ANGELA'" <Amattoso@mdck.com>, "'SAM'" <missshy@texas.net>
cc:

Subject:	FW: slut......serves her right haha

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephanie_E_Friedman@reliantenergy.com
[mailto:Stephanie_E_Friedman@reliantenergy.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 2:12 PM
To: ellie.bullard@mail.house.gov; christina@gulfcoastentertainment.com;
lacyprice@henrysmiller.com; kawise@hotmail.com; kafriedman@hotmail.com;
courtneyb@johndaugherty.com; emily1009@yahoo.com;
elizabeth_bowen@aimfunds.com; abradford28@hotmail.com;
alexa_carter@aimfunds.com; abradford28@hotmail.com;
laurasperry@excelonline.com; asorelle@h-s.com; MBowen1025@aol.com;
mgockturtle@mail.utexas.edu; allison.f.blanton@vanderbilt.edu;
AMcGee@thealexandergroup.com; BWare@rnchq.org;
christine_lawhon@amsinc.com; caledere@TexasChildrensHospital.org;
c.domercq@worldnet.att.net; erin.e.fowler@us.arthurandersen.com;
hbuche@kingadvisors.com; jana.m.dupree@us.arthurandersen.com;
jennspinks@aol.com; jsiff@central.uh.edu; jwunz@ncta.com;
lara.wright@bakerhughes.com; laurasperry@excelonline.com;
mbeery@HillandKnowlton.com; mmalone@loomissayles.com;
ssemple@SicolaMartin.com
Subject: slut......serves her right haha

Stephanie E. Friedman
Corporate Tax Department
Stephanie_E_Friedman@reliantenergy.com
(713) 207-3084
----- Forwarded by Stephanie E Friedman/ADM/HouInd on 05/10/01 02:08 PM
-----

                    gemma.moore@us.an

                    dersen.com               To:
Stephanie_E_Friedman@reliantenergy.com
                                             cc:
amanda.gaskin@us.andersen.com,
                    05/10/01 02:06 PM        carrie.a.henke@us.andersen.com,

                                             mgmateer@yahoo.com,

silvia.c.melendez@us.andersen.com,
                                             Rabitbear2@aol.com,
Bear4242@aol.com,
                                             ksm_00_99@yahoo.com,

leticia.ramirez@us.andersen.com,

meredith.riekert@us.pwcglobal.com,
                                             haley.c.smith@us.andersen.com,

                                             wallace_ashley@hotmail.com

                                             Subject:     slut......serves
her right haha

(See attached file: leopard.jpg)

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender
by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not
consent
to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and
other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of
my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

(See attached file: leopard.jpg)

 - leopard.jpg


Jennifer,

I cannot attend.

Vince

Jennifer Burns
02/06/2001 02:02 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael W
Bradley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adam Gross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill White/NA/Enron@Enron, Gary
Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Zoch/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gloria
Solis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Helen Marie Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tamara Jae
Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: REMINDER - Trader's Roundtable Meeting

There will be a Trader's Roundtable meeting today at 4:00PM in EB3321.
Please let me know if you are unable to attend.

Thanks!
Jennifer
3-9440


With respect to the ECT Merchant Investments Corp. and ENA contract and the
St. Mary's Production, LLC and ENA contract (Gary Bryan's "Preston" deal),
Melissa Graves and I will assume responsibility for having our records and
deals properly updated.  We would also be happy to perform the same task for
the Entrada/Crescendo contracts if you wish.

In any event, we need copies of the conveyancing documents for at least the
"Preston" deal and, if you wish us to update the Entrada/Cresendo deal also,
the conveyancing documents for that deal too.

George x3-6992

Teresa G Bushman
12/25/2000 09:13 PM
To: Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesus
Melendrez/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: VPP's get syndicated

I don't know the answer to that.  Does someone else?

Teresa

Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

	Joan Quick
	12/24/00 04:35 PM

		 To: Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jesus Melendrez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: VPP's get syndicated

When the existing VPP's get syndicated into Brazos later this week, then they
will be between Brazos [not Entrada] and Crescendo, and Brazos [not ECT
Merchant...] and St. Mary's, who is the person responsible for making sure
that the ENA contracts group makes the name change [assignment], and that
everything in ENA's internal system - Sitara gets changed accordingly?  And
also to make sure that these deals do not get duplicated?

thanks


Help Our Servicemen Save Their Votes

************************************************************************
Help defend the integrity of the vote!
Follow this link to contribute:
https://www.econtributor.net/Contribution/Contribution.cfm?AID=MFBWXSUVZGCH
***********************************************************************

Dear Echampion,

The situation in Florida is an outrage.  And it is getting worse.  The RNC
urgently needs your help today.

Over the weekend, Al Gore's campaign has waged an all-out effort to
disqualify military absentee ballots and almost succeeded in throwing out
over 1400 in all.  Military absentees were running heavily in favor of
Governor Bush - so they became a "shoot-to-kill" target for win-at-all-costs
Democrat operatives.

The articles below, one from the Chicago Sun Times and one from the New York
Post, amply demonstrate this "Democratic vote scheme."

The Gore effort to nullify the military vote was statewide.  A leaked five
page memo from the Gore staff laid out the details -- precise instructions to
Democrats in every county on how to challenge military ballots on
technicalities.  And as the ballots were counted in one county, the Chicago
Sun Times source noted:

"Gore had five attorneys there.  Their sole objective was to disenfranchise
the military absentee votes. They challenged each and every vote.  Their sole
intent was to disqualify each and every absentee voter.  They constantly
challenged military votes that were clearly legitimate, but they were able to
disqualify them on a technicality."

Such tactics are shameful.  This has been an exceptionally close election.
On Election Day, George W. Bush received a majority of the legitimately cast
and counted ballots in Florida and, with Florida's 25 electors, a majority of
the Electoral College.

Al Gore is now attempting to reverse the outcome of the election by getting
Democrat judges to rewrite Florida's election laws after the fact to permit
partisan Democrat officials to count thousands of improper ballots.  That is
bad enough -- but to selectively target our men and women in uniform purely
in order to knock out a few hundred more votes for George Bush is beneath
contempt.

We URGENTLY need your help today!  Please:

1) Make as generous a contribution as you can to the RNC's Fair Elections
Fund, by following this link:
https://www.econtributor.net/Contribution/Contribution.cfm?AID=MFBWXSUVZGCH

(If you want to contribute by check, you can print out a donor form through
this link:
http://www.rncfc.org/econtributor/mailcheck2.htm)

2) Call, e-mail and write your local elected officials, Democrats and
Republicans. Let them know that this recent ploy by the Gore campaign is an
outrageous insult to the men and women of our Armed Forces (you can get the
addresses, phone numbers and e-mail addresses of your elected Congress people
and Senators at http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/

3) Call your local talk radio show or TV news show and let them know your
strong views on this issue

4) Write a letter to the editor of your local, regional or national
newspapers on this important subject

5.) Finally, forward this  e-mail to your own e-mail list - to all of your
friends and neighbors who care about our men and women overseas and want the
truth to come out in Florida

This battle SHOULD be over.  George W. Bush and Dick Cheney won on November
7.  But because Al Gore refuses to accept the results, the fight goes on.
Please help the RNC give Governor Bush and Secretary Cheney the support they
need.

Sincerely,

Jim Nicholson
Chairman

Follow this link to contribute :
https://www.econtributor.net/Contribution/Contribution.cfm?AID=MFBWXSUVZGCH
*******************************************************************

Paid for by the Republican National Committee. Contributions or gifts to
the Republican National Committee are not deductible as charitable
contributions
for federal income tax purposes.

If you wish to unsubscribe from the eChampion mailing list, simply click here:

http://www.clickaction.net/partner/echampions2000/unsubscribe_box.html

*******************************************************************
NEWS ARTICLES:

Democrats' vote scheme
November 20, 2000
BY ROBERT NOVAK SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST
WASHINGTON--It was 4:30 a.m. in Jacksonville, Fla., Saturday when two
Democratic lawyers pumped their fists in the air and congratulated each
other. The local canvassing board had just thrown out overseas absentee
ballots of 44 U.S. service personnel. Their defect: no postmarks.

The board disenfranchising the service personnel was controlled by
Republicans, an irony reflective of the fight for Florida. Befuddled
Republicans were acting like good bureaucrats, following the letter of the
law. Delighted Democrats were part of a coolly crafted scheme to win
Florida--and the presidency. While granting maximum latitude in divining
intentions of Democratic senior citizens on the south Florida Gold Coast, the
predominantly Republican votes of young men and women serving their country
abroad would be scrutinized with no latitude.
When Al Gore and George W. Bush finished in a Florida dead heat, Republicans
viewed it like a normal recount. Democrats, in contrast, treated it like a
continuation of the 2000 campaign.

Gore's operatives have made no secret of their Florida arithmetic. They
calculated that the 300-vote Bush statewide margin following the full machine
recount would be erased by Gold Coast hand recounts so long as Gore's deficit
on overseas absentee ballots did not exceed 1,000 votes. The Gore campaign
worked to make sure that did not happen.

Mark Herron, a lawyer from the state capital of Tallahassee engaged in the
Gore campaign legal effort, last Wednesday sent off a five-page letter to
colleagues around the state addressed to "FDP (Florida Democratic Party)
Lawyer." The subject: "Overseas Absentee Ballot Review and Protest." It
amounted to a quickie guide for tossing out the serviceman's vote.

It worked. In Jacksonville, officials ignored an affidavit from an aircraft
carrier postal clerk swearing that mail sent by naval personnel often lacks a
postmark. Consequently, plenty of sailors lost their vote at 4:30 Saturday
morning (including, for example, Donnie Haynes, Michael Gentry and Clifford
Shearer from the USS George Washington).

Brevard County Republican Chairman Ray Marino went home at 11:30 p.m. Friday
after seven and one-half hours of inspecting overseas ballots and wrote this
memo:
"Gore had five attorneys there. Their sole objective was to disenfranchise
the military absentee votes. They challenged each and every vote. Their sole
intent was to disqualify each and every absentee voter. They constantly
challenged military votes that were clearly legitimate, but they were able to
disqualify them on a technicality."

In Broward County, 92 overseas ballots were accepted and 304 rejected. In
Miami-Dade County, 110 out of 113 were turned down. Statewide, 2,203 ballots
were accepted and 1,420 rejected. As a result, Bush's net overseas gain was
only 630, for an overall Florida lead of 930.

That meant only 930 votes need be won by Gore in the hand-counting of heavily
Democratic Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach counties. They were working
hard at it. David Fulcher, a lawyer from Jackson, Miss., sent to Palm Beach
to help out, described to me a scene of chaos and confusion--of Bush ballots
put in the Gore pile, followed by protests and arguments.

It became clear at midweek, however, that Palm Beach would not yield enough
new Gore votes. Pressure was successfully applied to canvassing boards in
Broward and Miami-Dade to reverse themselves and order countywide hand
recounts. But late Saturday, when Gore planners became concerned about
surpassing the 930-vote margin in the three counties, the rules were suddenly
changed to permit easier tests for reading the intention of any voter who
failed to make a hole in the punch card.

See the full article at <http://www.suntimes.com/output/novak/novak20.html>
---------------------------------------
THE FLORIDA CIRCUS: HAS AL NO DECENCY?
John Podhoretz
The New York Post
Sunday,November 19,2000

IF the "butterfly ballot" in Florida's Palm Beach County had led to the
disqualification of 40 percent of the county's presidential votes,
Republicans wouldn't be protesting the manual recount there. There would have
been no question in everyone's mind that some combination of ballot
irregularity, manipulation and outright fraud had taken place. But only 5
percent of the Palm Beach ballots were invalidated.

It now appears that 40 percent of Florida's overseas ballots have been
invalidated. Democrats are convinced that their outrage on behalf of Al Gore
and his position as the supposedly "true" winner of Florida is justified
largely because of the furor that arose on the day after the election from
the butterfly-ballot controversy.

How do they feel, today, knowing that - let me say it again, and in bold-face
type: Forty percent of Florida's overseas ballots have been invalidated?

It also appears that most of those invalidated votes came from enlistees in
the U.S. military as the result of a coordinated Democratic strategy designed
by Tallahassee lawyer Mark Herron, who is involved in various Gore voter
lawsuits.

Here's what this means: Al Gore, who is by all accounts totally and
intimately involved in every aspect of the process underway in Florida, may
well have approved an effort to challenge every absentee vote in Florida cast
by the servicemen and servicewomen whose commander-in-chief he will become if
he is sworn in as president.

I have no doubt that the challenges are legal. Florida tightened its
absentee-vote procedures after massive fraud in 1998 led to the illegitimate
election of Miami Mayor Xavier Suarez - whom a judge removed from office when
the extent of his campaign's grave offense against the U.S. electoral system
became clear.

Republicans, who have been hewing to the letter of the law in making their
argument against the hand recounts in four Democratic counties, are not
exactly in a position to argue for greater leniency on these military
ballots. Such an affirmative-action claim would make a mockery of George W.
Bush's own argument in federal court that the hand count violates the 14th
amendment's equal-protection clause.
But the Gore campaign's conduct makes an even greater mockery of the vice
president's insistence on a "full, fair and accurate count." Again - this
cannot be said often enough - 40 percent of the overseas and absentee ballots
have been invalidated as a direct result of a Democratic strategy intended to
benefit the vice president.

Republicans will be falling all over themselves to accuse the vice president
of "hypocrisy," which is becoming the most tiresome game of this
post-election season. Let me stipulate that there is indeed hypocrisy on both
sides.
The real issue in the matter of the absentee ballots is the very deep and
very, very dark cynicism of Gore's efforts to make himself president. In
pursuit of this ambition imprinted on him at birth, Al Gore really is willing
to do just about anything.

The vice president has now proved himself capable of actively seeking the
disenfranchisement of military voters out of fear that they might have voted
for his rival (the challenges had to be issued before the envelopes were
opened). None of those Florida residents can now be sure that his or her vote
was ever counted.

E-mail: podhoretz@nypost.com <mailto:podhoretz@nypost.com>

See the full article at www.nypost.com <http://www.nypost.com>

-----------------------------------------------------------

If you wish to unsubscribe from the eChampion mailing list, simply click here:

http://www.clickaction.net/partner/echampions2000/unsubscribe_box.html

To become an eChampion click here:

http://www.echampions2000.com


Title: Monthly Gas Briefing: Another Fall Tradition
URL(s):

http://www.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2802;

***********************************************************************

NATURAL GAS MARKET LOOKS FOR THE ARRIVAL OF WINTER

Natural gas market participants are renewing the annual tradition of seizing on
each weather forecast for hints of the onset of winter weather. Although these
jitters have led to higher early-November prices, the winter market looks to be
well supplied owing to the combination of milder weather, depressed demand,
high storage levels, and ample production. December Henry Hub prices are
expected to average $2.70 per MMBtu.

* US gas storage inventories are estimated to leveled off at 3,107 billion
cubic feet (Bcf) by the end of October. Without harsher weather, the year-over-
year storage surplus should swell to over 770 Bcf by end-December.

* December demand will be significantly lower than in 2000 due largely to the
milder weather expected this year. While some industrial demand will return due
to lower gas prices, overall demand should be 11 percent lower than last year.

**end**

Follow above URL for complete CERA Monthly Briefing (6 printed pages).

E-mail Category: Monthly Briefing
CERA Knowledge Area(s): North American Gas

***********************************************************************
**************************************************************************************
CERAWeek February 11-15, 2002 - http://www.cera.com/ceraweek

SPECIAL OFFER: Register on-line before November 30th, and a 2-Day Pass
will be upgraded to a 4-Day Pass (maximum $1,800 value).
Day 1: Global Oil/Refined Products;
Day 2: Natural Gas/Global Energy;
Day 3 & 4: Electric Power
**************************************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates