In my interview I stressed that a big part of the communication problem is
the narrow and impermanent nature of the information about what's going on at
Enron.  Narrow because for every significant activity there are only a few
who are in the loop and "impermanent" because very little information is
committed to writing (most of it is exchanged in person or over the phone).
This is, I believe, what lies at the heart of complaints about
cross-department communication.  We now have some solutions emerging --
software that enables more people to record and post information in HTML
format on company intranet sites.  I suspect that using such tools will face
two obstacles: learning how to use them (ie there's a huge need for training)
and making it part of our culture as a knowledge/learning organization

Richard Amabile
08/18/2000 05:20 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Jan Johnson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gina Taylor/OTS/Enron@Enron, Mike
Stewart/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave Schafer/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David A
Terlip/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Marie
Hejka/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Craig Childers/HOU/EES@EES, Craig H
Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Kirk McDaniel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Kathleen A Cook/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Sparks/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James C
Lewis/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ray Bennett/HOU/EES@EES, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, George Wasaff/NA/Enron@Enron,
Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew S
Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Billy Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Yeager@ees, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marie
Hejka/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Thompson/LON/ECT@ECT, Nigel Sellens/LON/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT@ECT, Marla Barnard/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, robert.jones@enron.com, Kimberly Rizzi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Janie
Bonnard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, willie.williams@enron.com, Scott
Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tim O'Rourke/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Miguel Padron/SA/Enron@Enron, Gerry Chatham/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy
Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ranendra Sengupta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: ksargent@cognitivearts.com

Subject: Computer Based Communications Training Initiative - Response
Reminder for Feedback

This is a reminder that we would like your feedback/input on the items
mentioned below regarding the Computer Based Communications Training
Initiative.  Please respond by the close of business Monday, August 21
otherwise we will need to move ahead with the responses received by that time.
             Dick Amabile
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Amabile/HR/Corp/Enron on
08/18/2000 04:31 PM ---------------------------

Richard Amabile
08/16/2000 02:40 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Jan Johnson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gina Taylor/OTS/Enron@Enron, Mike
Stewart/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave Schafer/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David A
Terlip/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Amabile/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Craig
Childers/HOU/EES@EES, Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Kirk
McDaniel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathleen A
Cook/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Sparks/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James C
Lewis/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard
Leibert/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ray Bennett/HOU/EES@EES, Joseph
W Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, George Wasaff/NA/Enron@Enron,
Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew S
Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Billy Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Diane Bazelides/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Scott Yeager@ees, Eric
Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Thompson/LON/ECT@ECT, Nigel
Sellens/LON/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT@ECT, Marla
Barnard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, robert.jones@enron.com,
Kimberly Rizzi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Janie
Bonnard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, willie.williams@enron.com, Scott
Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tim O'Rourke/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Miguel Padron/SA/Enron@Enron, Gerry Chatham/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy
Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ranendra Sengupta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: ksargent@cognitivearts.com

Subject: Computer Based Communications Training Initiative

As agreed in our V&V meeting today I have attached two items for your review:
1. A list of those who have been interviewed or have been part of a focus
group on this subject.

The input from individuals on this list will be the basis for developing the
5-7 key scenarios that will be a part of the training.  Please let me know if
you feel we should include more people from your unit to insure that your
unit's unique circumstances are appropriately taken into account.  If so, let
us know either their names or how you would like them to be identified.

Some of the individuals on this list will be contacted as Subject Matter
Experts to help provide real Enron contexts for the scenarios as they are
further developed.

2. A list of the "first draft" objectives for the program and 10 possible
scenarios.

Since we will only be able to have a total of about 5-7 scenarios in the
final version, identify the 5 - 7 on this list of high level scenario ideas
that will have the most impact on improving communications and the most
applicability to a range of managers across the Enron organization.  Any
other feedback you can provide on the objectives or scenarios would be
greatly appreciated.

We are seeking to move forward with the development of scenarios by the
beginning of next week.  Therefore, if you could provide your feedback on
both of the items above by Friday, August 18th, it would be greatly
appreciated.

             Dick Amabile


Attached is the list we supplied to Fran.

I will call with the ones that have moved on.

thanks

bob


How difficult issues are resolved in Illinois..........
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000
08:06 AM ---------------------------
From: Susan M Landwehr on 11/29/2000 10:08 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:

Rick/Harry/Jim--- it's a tie this year for who is the worst player in the
energy business---I can't decide which is more appalling---  Commissioner
Ruth Kretschmer's blatant grab for her legacy or Commonwealth Edison's sleazy
tactics.

You'll recall that Com Ed has been trying to get accelerated collection of
the decommissioning costs ($120 mil per year for 6 years) despite the fact
tht they're planning on transferring their nuclear plants to an unregulated
Genco.  The battle has been ongoing at the ICC, and the customers and CUB and
other intervenors have been successful in getting the hearing examiner to
state that Com Ed should not be able to collect any dollars if they transfer
the assets.  Our hope was that the ICC would actually agree with the hearing
examiner and deny the request, and that Com Ed would have to go to the
legislature to get language that would allow them to collect.  The ICC has
not ruled yet.  Anticipating that COm Ed would simultaneously work the
legislative side,we have been working at the statehouse for about a month to
sow the seeds to make sure that we could block them enough to get a trade
such as a year or two of CTC early roll off.  The legislature is in veto
session right now, and Com Ed has not been able to get enough backing to move
a bill.

So....low and behold, a fax comes across this evening and it's a letter to
the ICC from Com Ed offering to donate 2 of it's nuclear station sites to the
citizens of Illinois to use as public parks after the sites are
decommissioned if they are given the full $120 mil/6 year collection. And
gee, do you think that maybe one of the parks would be named after the woman
who brought it to the people!!??

There has been a rumor for about a year that Ruth had been angling with John
Rowe to have one of the nuclear sites donated in her name, and she started
ruminating in public and in semi public meetings about 6 weeks ago about the
general concept.

Part of me wishes that we didn't have any business interests that need
protecting in Illinois, as I  really would like to give a quote to Crains or
the Tribune tomorrow slamming Kretschmer and Com Ed. Isn't this just the
height of arrongance and corruption??!!

I'll be sending out a general info e mail tomorrow on this development to the
Project Lincoln team and of course Roy that is a bit more sanitized, but
wanted you guys to know the real scoop (plus I think I just wanted to vent!)


Lucy,

Here is a final 12/01 rentroll for you to save.  My only questions are:

1.  Neil Moreno in #21-he paid $120 on 11/24, but did not pay anything on
12/01.  Even if he wants to swich to bi-weekly, he needs to pay at the
beginning
     of the two week period.  What is going on?

2.  Gilbert in #27-is he just late?

Here is a file for 12/08.


Attached is a draft letter for EE&CC concerning the Station 27 Bid.  Please
review and let me know if you have any questions.


Please plan to attend a meeting regarding Financial Issues on Monday the 30th
from 10:00am to 11:00am in EB3125B.  If you are unable to attend please call
me directly at X3-9030. The meeting will be hosted by Kim Theriot Manager of
Power and Gas Documentation.

Many Thanks,
Yolanda


I will look at it later today.

"Salazar, Alexis" <ASalazar@PIRNIE.COM> on 03/01/2001 08:35:43 AM
To: "Mat Smith (E-mail 2)" <matt.smith@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:

hey!

Have you had a chance to look at my resume?  I played around with my resume
last week and added a couple of things, or should I say tried to "enhance"
it.  Look at it and let me know what you think.

thanks!

Alexis Salazar
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.
1700 W. Loop South, Suite 950
Houston, TX 77027
Direct: 713-960-7414
asalazar@pirnie.com
 <<ALEXIS.DOC>>

 - ALEXIS.DOC


See attached.

Thanks,

Rose


Damn, I planned on going until I saw the invite list.

Just kidding, it will be good to see you all again-- even Benson.

Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Benson Goebel [SMTP:benson03@juno.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday,December 18,2001 8:44 AM
> To:	Scott.Goebel@ci.austin.tx.us
> Cc:	Stacey.W.White@ENRON.com; russellt@cottonrestorationinc.com;
> kmduren@pbsj.com; jeffl@texas.net; McMahonM@kochind.com
> Subject:	Christmas Party
>
> Kendrich wanted me to let everyone know that he is having a Christmas
> Party at his parents house in Cuero.
> It is set for Sunday, December 23 at around 6:00 p.m.
> Please spread the word!!!!!!!!
> Snacks and Appetizers will be provided.
> BYOB.
>
> Benson


Rob Hank


fine

From: Sarah Wesner/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/22/2001 03:17 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fimat

John - do you mind sharing your Fimat line with the crude traders?  Current
usage is about $6 million.  Also Warren thought that he might be able to
change the variation limit from about $10 million to $6 million.  This change
would allow us to use the line for $14 million for original margin (they have
a good rate.)  Warren is going to call you about it.  Sarah


Hi Mark -

Could you provide a quick update on the status regarding the Subject of
whether the GTC's should continue to be attached to the Houston EOL
confirmations?  If you would prefer, I can also arrange to discuss this in
your office.  Please advise.

Thanks  -

Rob
x 35491

Subject:  "The Legal Group in London (Justin Boyd) has advised that office
that it would be OK to stop sending GTC's with confirms.  The London
documentation teams in London have been advised to include the following
language on their EnronOnline transactions that are governed under GTC's (not
governed by Master Agreements):

"This Transaction is governed by the EnronOnline General Terms and Conditions
(GTC) that you have accepted via EnronOnline. For a copy of this GTC, please
click on the Product Description on the EnronOnline website and choose "View
GTC".

Please advise if this policy may be applied to the EnronOnline transactions
for the Houston office. "


Thanks Vince.  If there are other members in your group that did not get this
e-mail, please forward it to them.  The school called yesterday and they said
that no one from Enron was taking advantage of the conference other than
yourself.

Thanks again.

Karen


The FERC denied Dynegy's petition for declaratory order by the Commission disclaiming the jurisdiction over the siting, construction and operation of the Hackberry, La. LNG facility.

A copy of the order will be available later today for review.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Friday, September 07, 2001 10:11 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Robertson, Linda; Kaufman, Paul; Guerrero, Janel; Shelk, John; Novosel, Sarah; Hartsoe, Joe; Alvarez, Ray; Comnes, Alan; Nersesian, Carin; Walton, Steve; Perrino, Dave; Lindberg, Susan; Nord, Sue; Nichols, Douglas; HAWKE, STEVE; Kean, Steven J.; Migden, Janine
Subject:	Show Cause order info

Please provide comments on the draft show cause order by COB Monday 9/10.  There may be a revised version out later today with Steve W. and some other comments incorporated after yesterday's phone call.  Final draft should be ready Tues. or Wed. and we will have a conference call late Wed afternoon to finalize.  It can then be shopped at FERC (Linda/Sarah -- can you gather a list of who to contact at FERC?)  Also, Steve and Rick will take it to the Commissioner meetings on 9/17.

We want to have some press coverage when we file (Janel to handle?)
Paul is going to clear this with PGE deal folks
Paul needs to give a heads up to Western govs when we file
We can provide it the day before or day of filing to some groups:  Ideas
-EPSA
-ELCON, Steel group, etal. (filed this week to support FERC mandating a single Midwest RTO)
-Nat'l Rural Elec. Coop (Glenn English recently gave a speech requesting a fully integrated grid)
-These groups filed to make Alliance get an independent board (Janine-would they be helpful?):  Coalition of Midwest Transmission Customers, Industrial Energy Users-Ohio; WVa Energy Users Group; Assoc. of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity; Citizens Action Coalition of Ind; Izaak Walton League of North America; Environmental Law and Policy Center
-Some coops and munis represented by Speigal and McDiarmid in DC and Miller Balis & ONeill in DC (EPMI signed on to their filing against the NC PUC's request for stay of the SE RTO mediation)

Contains Steve's comments                        << File: EnronReq-Notes(SLW).DOC >>          plus, we are changing the MBRs test to state that OATT is not enough to mitigate transmission market power -- need to agree to join RTO as finally ordered per 7/12 orders.  Thanks


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/29/2000 08:43
AM ---------------------------

Matthew F Gockerman@ECT
08/28/2000 07:05 PM
To: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: MidWest Energy Hub LLC - Name Change to Enovate Energy

Gregg:

We should register Midwest Energy Hub, L.L.C. ("Midwest") for Sales & Use Tax
in those states in which Midwest has nexus.  Nexus requires a physical
presence (employees or inventory).  If Midwest, in foreign states (outside of
Illinois), is merely purchasing and selling natural gas, for delivery by
common carrier; Midwest does not have nexus.  Rather, Midwest is acting much
like a mail order seller.

In light of the above, could you please advise regarding Midwest's physical
presence in Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Oklahoma, Texas and
Wisconsin.  Thanks.

- Matt
x33979

	From:  Gregg Penman @ ENRON                           08/21/2000 04:37 PM

To: Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: MidWest Energy Hub LLC - Name Change to Enovate Energy

Matt - Per our conversation today, the following e-mail was sent by Russell
Murrell regarding the impending name change of Midwest Energy Hub, L.L.C.  My
understanding is that we have already bought/sold natural gas in Oklahoma,
Texas, and Louisianna.  The remaining states in his e-mail are potential
future places of business.  I will leave it up to your discretion as to how
you want to pursue registering for taxes in these locales.  I am guessing we
may want to register in those states we have already transacted in.  Please
let me know what you think we should do.

Thanks,

Gregg
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 08/21/2000
02:33 PM ---------------------------

Russell E Murrell
08/21/2000 02:19 PM
To: gregg.penman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: MidWest Energy Hub LLC - Name Change to Enovate Energy

We may want to add Arkansas to this list too...

---------------------- Forwarded by Russell E Murrell/Corp/Enron on
08/08/2000 09:51 AM ---------------------------

Russell E Murrell
08/04/2000 11:17 AM
To: Teresa Callahan/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: MidWest Energy Hub LLC - Name Change to Enovate Energy

We will be doing the vast majority of our business in Illinois;  however we
may also transact in Michigan, Indiana, Wisconsin, Iowa, Texas, Louisiana,
Oklahoma, Kansas.

Thanks for your help.  Let me know if you need anything.

Russell
(312) 541-1159


Steve:

Your angle is much better for the corporation, and a lot of the below might
be "mastering the obvious," but here it is.

- Rob

-----------------------------------------------------
 The petroleum, natural gas, and electricity price situations have a
different set of facts but a common demoninator--very tight infrastructure
relative to energy demand.  Here is a general set of conclusions with a few
"sound bites."

* The current energy price situation is "all about economics."  It is
economics 101--supply and demand.  Demand has been rising faster than supply
with a predictable response.  This is the bad news for consumers.  The good
news is that there is reason to believe that prices for oil and natural gas
are at the top of their commodity price cycle.  The NYMEX futures market
shows a "backwardation curve" for both--look in the daily Wall Street Journal
in Section C under "Futures Prices"  that usually is around page 14.  Look at
the settle price for the different energy commodities and the prices after
the prompt month (October) fall over the next months and years except for
this winter's natural gas price.

* Big oil did not suddenly get big or greedy with petroleum prices any more
than "big gas" has with natural gas.  Many of the same players were
profit-maximizing during the previous price slump.

* The constraint on energy markets is not the resource base but the
infrastructure to produce, refine, and transport supplies.  Infrastructure
constraints have had a cumulative effect of slowing the great engine of
market supply,    reflected siting issues and also low profitability (partly
the result of rapid implementation of new environmental requirements).

* The solution is to stop taking supply for granted and build more
flexibility and incentives in the system to profitably meet ever-rising
demand.  Energy investment must compete against many New Economy investment
opportunities that have potentially high rates of return.

Oil

This is a global market so declining U.S. production is a very small part of
the world supply, but the real constraint is domestic refining capacity.
Since 1990, operable U.S. refineries have declined from 205 to 159 when 50
refineries closed and only 4 new refineries entered the market.  [National
Petroleum Council, "U.S. Petroleum Refining," June 2000, p. 23.  Other
refineries have been able to expand to increase overall capacity, but
capacity utilization has risen rapidly in recent years and is above 95%--a
tight situation.  EPA permits to allow further expansion is a major issue to
making sure that domestic infrastructure keeps up with demand (p. 27).  A
number of proposed requirements to further improve the environmental quality
of gasoline has raised profitability questions as well (pp. 27-30).

The two actions the U.S. can take in the short run to increase crude supplies
are to lift the embargo on Iraq and withdraw oil from the Strategic Petroleum
Reserve (up to 3 mmbd).  Liquidating the reserve could be part of a
privatization program to get support from the free market community, and the
proceeds could be used to help low income energy users this winter.  The days
don't get much more "rainy" than now given that without price controls price
and not supply is in question in an "emergency."

A longer run approach must be to encourage domestic and international
drilling to make the supply response as elastic as possible to higher
prices.  Alaska activity such as drilling at the Arctic National Wildlife
Reserve (ANWR) would be a major contribution to world supplies.

On the gasoline side, much has been written about "boutique fuels" where
certain environmental requirements are required for certain regions that
makes the supply/demand balance very sensitive to interruptions (such as
refinery downtime or a pipeline closure).  The key to prevent price spikes
for consumers is to not let new environmental requirements outrace technology
or infrastructure constraints.  This discontinuity happened earlier this
summer in Chicago, for example, where gasoline prices rose well above $2 per
gallon.

Electricity

This is an infrastructure problem that could be alleviated by a more
efficient use of the transmission grid to get power to its highest valued
uses.  California in particular has followed a "soft" energy path where
conservation was substituted for permitting urgency for new power plants.
The digital age is driving demand growth although many traditional appliances
(such as refrigerators) are using less power.  General economic growth also
means many new appliances, traditional and new, are being produced and used,
adding to power demand.

Natural Gas

 Natural gas supplies (and infrastructure to some degree) must catch up to
high demand after many years of slumping gas prices and reduced incentive.
Over 200 Tcf of potential gas reserves is in areas that are off limits to
drilling--something that should be corrected given the advances in drilling
technology that make exploration and production much less invasive to surface
area than ever before.  Other public policy drivers should be a continued
emphasis on expedited certification for new pipelines and avoiding new short
run regulatory "fixes."  Past this winter, however, gas prices are expected
to decline, so consumers can lock in long term prices that are below current
prices.

Conclusion

Energy supply and infrastructure have been taken for granted for too long.
It was assumed that low prices would continue despite increasing
disincentives to increase supply and infrastructure to meet demand.  Demand
has also increased faster than thought due to economic prosperity and the
"wealth effect."  Market forces can correct the imbalance over time without
regulatory quick fixes and with reasonable incentives for industry
performance.

Robert L. Bradley Jr.
Director, Public Policy Analysis
Enron Corp.
P.O Box 1188, Room 4724a
[1400 Smith Street 77002]
Houston, Texas 77251-1188

(P) 713-853-3062
(F) 713-646-4702

Assistant: Joan Stransky 713-853-4702
jstrans@enron.com


Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000 02:48 PM -----

	Brenda Whitehead
	09/15/2000 02:25 PM

		 To: Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject:

per the request of Bart Clark, please see these attachments:


Hey Rob,
I still need to get this approval.

Thanks,

Eric
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2001 08:12 AM
---------------------------
Eric Bass   02/20/2001 02:47 PM

To: Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Product Approval

Hey melba,

I need to get IF GD/D Waha for Mar approved.

Thanks in advance,

Eric


The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by:  System
Expense Report Name: AGC Conference
Report Total: $1,464.37
Amount Due Employee: $1,464.37
Amount Approved: $1,464.37
Amount Paid: $1,464.37
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: Paid

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


I will be attending the lunch.

-Eric x3-0977

	From:  Ami Chokshi @ ENRON                           01/20/2000 10:06 AM

To: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pamela Chambers/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: CES Deal Summary

The meeting has been time has been changed to 11:30 am-1:00 pm. Please let me
know if you'll be able to attend and/or if there will be any others
attending, so we can have an accurate head count for lunch.

Ami
3-9272

The following meeting is to discuss the new deals that have come to the Texas
desk from CES

TOPIC:  CES Deals Summary
DATE:  Friday, January 21
TIME:   2:00 PM - 3:00 PM
LOCATION:  3749

Please e-mail me prior to Friday with any specific questions that you may
want to address.

Thank you,

Ami
3-9272


One of EOTT's top priorities is to excel in environmental compliance because
that is the right thing to do and because we want to be a good neighbor.  We
do not need any other reasons...but in case we needed one more, please read
Ms. Browner's remarks below.

Also, the Secretary of EPA's remarks vividly demonstrate the value of good
relationships, open communications and mutual respect between EOTT and
environmental agencies.  Al Hugh, Paul Newman and the EH&S team along with
EOTT field management and employees have a great track record of doing just
that.  And we obviously intend to redouble our efforts to continue to improve
that spirit of cooperation and enhance that mutual respect.

Carol M. Browner, Administrator Environmental Protection Agency Remarks
Prepared for Delivery
Clean Water Act Enforcement Press Conference

Washington, D.C.
Jan. 13, 2000

Good afternoon.
From Day One, this Administration has been dedicated to the principle
that corporations
must be held accountable for damage they cause to the environment. It's
this simple: You pollute, you pay.
We will not allow companies to profit at the expense of the environment
and public health
With that in mind, today, EPA and the Justice Department are announcing
the largest civil fine ever imposed against a single company for
violations of environmental law -- a $30- million civil penalty against
Koch Industries of Wichita, Kansas.
I want to thank Texas State Attorney General John Cornyn for joining EPA
in the suit that brought this settlement about. I also want to thank
Attorney General Reno and the Justice Department for all their help with
today's action and all my colleagues at EPA.
This has been one of our most difficult and contentious environmental
actions ever. It wasn't until the consent decree was even signed that we
got a map. It wasn't until we got a judge to rule the company was liable
that serious discussions began.
Koch Industries owns and operates 35,000 miles of pipeline in the
Midwest and South that carry crude oil and other related products,
making it the largest pipeline company in the country.
An EPA investigation found that over a seven-year period from 1990 to
1997 Koch illegally discharged more than three million gallons of crude
oil from its pipelines and into the ponds, lakes, rivers and shorelines
of Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri and Alabama.
These spills occurred in more than 300 separate locations. EPA charged
that this pollution could have been -- and should have been -- prevented
by Koch Industries through the proper operation and maintenance of their
pipelines.
In Payne County Oklahoma home of Oklahoma State University over 221,000
gallons were released resulting in an oil spill that traveled 25 miles
to Keystone Lake, a popular recreational facility.
In Corpus Christi Bay, 90,300 gallons spilled, resulting in the oiling
of migratory birds and the killing of thousands of fish.
In a rural community northeast of Wichita, Kansas, part of a public
water supply system was forced to shut down as a result of over 78,000
gallons of unleaded gasoline spilling into a nearby creek.
In Grayson County, Texas just north of Dallas-Fort. Worth nearly 63,000
gallons spilled into a creek that flows into the Hagerman National
Wildlife Refuge. This Refuge is a popular birding area where several
endangered species can be seen.
With today's settlement, Koch Industries commits to take actions that
should prevent this from happening again.
Their failure to invest in appropriate pollution prevention mechanisms
led to this fine and the millions of dollars they will now have to spend
to bring their systems into compliance.

Besides the $30-million civil penalty which will be split between the
federal government and the state of Texas Koch also has agreed to spend
$5 million on environmental projects in the states it polluted.
$1.5 million will go to buy and preserve wetlands or wildlife habitats
in Kansas and Oklahoma. $2.5 million will go to Texas for environmental
projects to be carried out under the direction of the state. And
finally, $1 million will be used to pay for a pipeline safety study in
Texas and Oklahoma.
The company will also hire an independent auditor who for a minimum of
three years will inspect and report on whether the company is meeting
the requirements of this settlement.
This Administration has pledged to protect public health and preserve
the environment by making sure there is no profit in pollution.
You pollute. You pay. It's that simple.


Monika,

Please find tomorrow's Market Wrap attached.  You'll note that I modified the format slightly, but in general it's the same.  Have a great weekend and enjoy your time away from the office.  See you next week sometime.  Thanks.

KC


Louise,

Sempra Energy has called and asked to "cover' outstanding positions with Enron.
They have done some deals with me this morning via EOL, as well as a "sleeve" with EPNG in order to minimize their exposure with us.  Indications were that they have longer dated power and other gas positions that they want to minimize as well,  I advised them to call the respected traders first, as apposed to calling voice brokers,  to see what they can facilitate.


Mark/Steve -- Meredith has made great progress working w/ Kekst on updating
Enron descriptions in all the key databases -- the project is nearly done!  kd
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 05/23/2000
01:13 PM ---------------------------

mherley <michael-herley@KEKST.COM> on 05/22/2000 04:42:57 PM
To: "'kdenne@enron.com'" <kdenne@enron.com>, "'Meredith@enron.com'"
<Meredith@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Progress Report

As tomorrow is my last day in the office before the "Big Day" I wanted to
provide both of you with an update as to where we stand on the Online
Database Audit.

TAB C (Baseline) -- Baseline has updated its Business Overview of Enron
Corp. and the new version has been approved by Mark Palmer.

TAB E (CorpTech/OneSource) -- The listing questionnaire was faxed to
Meredith last week to be updated and faxed directly back to CorpTech.

TAB F (DJ Interactive) -- The data in the DJ report comes from Hoover's.  I
am currently working with Hoover's to update the Business Description in the
DJ report.

TAB G (D&B) -- An updated list of officers, directors, financials and the
expanded business description has been sent to the update desk at D&B.  It
will probably take at least 3 weeks for the D&B report to be updated.

TAB H (Extel Company Report) -- Extel is now reporting updated financials
for Enron Corp.  Extel is also in the process of updating the Activities and
Management section of the report.

TAB K (Hoover's) -- Hoover's is in the process of updating its list of
Officers for Enron Corp.

TAB M (Market Guide) -- Market Guide is in the process of changing the
Company's name to Enron Corp. and is updating its Business Summary and list
of Officers for the Company.  In addition, we could have Enron moved into
the Oil & Gas Operations Industry of the Energy Sector within Market Guide.
The peer group members of this new classification have been sent over to
Enron.  Please let me know how you would like to proceed.

TAB O (Multex) -- Multex is in the process of updating its Business Overview
of Enron, which should include changing the size of Enron's assets to $33
billion and possibly including the Company's ranking within the Fortune 500.
In addition, I am exploring if there is a more advantageous industry
classification for Enron.  Enron is currently classified in the Basic Energy
industry sector and its peer group is Major Pipeline Companies.  Dynegy's
peer group is Major Oil & Gas Gathering & Marketing Companies -- perhaps
this is a more appropriate classification for Enron.  Please let me know
that you think.

TAB R (Quicken)  -- Quicken obtains its data from Media General Financial
Services.  I have spoken with an analyst at Media General and he has updated
the Descriptor for Enron: "Delivers physical commodities and financial and
risk management services to customers; develops, constructs and operates
energy facilities worldwide; produces electricity and natural gas; and is
developing a network platform to facilitate on line business."  The new
descriptor should appear on Quicken.com within the next several days.  In
addition, I am working with the analyst to develop a more appropriate
Industry classification for Enron.  Media General currently classifies Enron
as a Basic Materials Wholesale company.

TAB S (Reuters MoneyNet) -- The data on this service is provided by Market
Guide (TAB M).

TAB T (Reuters Business Briefing) -- Reuters is in the process of updating
the Activities section for Enron, which includes changing the Company's name
to Enron Corp.; changing the IR contact to Mark Koenig; and updating the
number of employees at the Company.

TAB W (Value Line) -- Work in progress.

I will give the both of you a call tomorrow to discuss the next steps of the
project.

Michael


Shane,

Thanks for your message.  As a matter of fact, I expected your resume in time
for our summer internship program.

We shall be glad to invite you for an interview. How long "sabbatical" do you
envisage?

Vince

P.S. Shirley,   please, call Shane to arrange an interview with HR.

"Shane Green" <shanecgreen@earthlink.net> on 06/19/2000 02:14:00 PM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Dr. Kaminski:
?
You probably won't remember my name, but I am the Ph.D.  student that took
you back to the airport after your visit to Louisiana State  University
during the previous academic year.
?
I received my M.S. in Finance in May of last year, and chose  to?remain at
LSU to work on my Ph.D. At that time, I intended to pursue a  career
in?teaching and research at a four year college or university.?  In
part?because of your visit,?and my?primary interest in  normative research,
my?plans have changed.? While I?still want to  earn my Ph.D.,?I plan to
pursue a career in research in the private  sector.
?
As you know, Ph.D. programs in financial economics are  designed to train
future academics.? Not surprisingly, they emphasize  methods to approach the
types of questions that are of interest to finance  academics.? What did
surprise me, however, was that these areas of interest  often had little to
do with what I imagined to be the concerns of practitioners  in the real
world.? As you mentioned in your discussion, academic  researchers know
little about what their counterparts in the private sector
are?doing.?????????????????????????????????????
?
In light of my objective, I feel I would get the most out of  the remainder
of my doctoral studies if I took some time off to work in the  private sector
to see first hand the?types of challenges I can expect to  face as a
researcher in corporate America.? As my primary interests revolve  around the
use of derivatives and financial engineering in corporate risk  management,
Enron, as the leading innovator in these areas, would be an ideal  place to
learn.? I was wondering if you were aware of any openings at the  company
that might provide me with the exposure I am looking for.? If there  are no
such positions or opportunities, any advice or suggestions you could give
me,?such as whether or not you think such a "sabbatical" (for lack of a
better term) would be helpful, or information on private sector careers for
Ph.D.'s would be greatly appreciated.?
?
I am sending a current copy of my vita as an attachment.?  If you have any
questions my e-mail address is sgreen@finance.lsu.edu.? Thanks  for your help
and advice.
?
?
Cordially,
?
?
?
?
Shane Green
?
?
?????
 - Vita.doc


In order to continually develop and make improvements to the functionality of EnronOnline we are rolling out several changes tonight, which will be in effect on Monday August 20, 2001. Some of these changes will affect Stack Manager while others affect the Website. A summary of these changes is listed below.

Stack Manager Changes

Top of Stack limit orders - This feature will allow the price submitted via limit orders to be displayed on the website if their bid or offer is better than the trader's stack price. Stack Manger will list the price and the names of counterparties submitting such orders on the  floated stack window.  Orders will be queued by price and time stamp. When a counterparty trades on a " Top of Stack Entry" it will create back to back transactions; one between Enron and the counterparty submitting the order, and the other between Enron and the counterparty clicking on the website.

In order to turn on this functionality select the " Allowed Top of Stack" option, in the Orders section of the product properties page.  If regular limit order functionality is desired the "Allowed"  option should be selected.

Please note that this feature will be released in a disabled mode and will be turned on sometime next week after determining which business units want to roll this out.

Restricted Top of Stack limit orders - This feature will allow the price submitted only by internal traders via limit orders to be displayed on the website if their bid or offer is better than the trader's stack price. Stack Manger will list price and the names of counterparties submitting such orders on the  floated stack window.  Orders will be queued by price and time stamp. When a counterparty trades on a " Top of Stack Entry" it will create back to back transactions one between Enron and the counterparty submitting the order, and the other between Enron and the counterparty clicking on the website.

In order to turn on this functionality select the " allowed as Restricted Top of Stack" option, in the Orders section of the product properties page.  If regular limit order functionality is desired the "Allowed"  option should be selected. If a product has active orders against it you will not be able to select the "Restricted Top of Stack" feature.

Advanced Filtering Ability on All Products Tab -  Drop down filtering capability is now available for each field in the All Products tab in stack manager. In order to filter click on the arrow next to the field title. A drop down box with a list of attributes will appear. Highlight the attribute by which you wish to filter. To turn off the filter click on the arrow and select the " All" option from the drop down box.

Website Changes

New Submission Screen for Restricted Top of Stack Limit Orders -  The submission screen for  products that allow  Top of Stack or Restricted Top of Stack limit orders is as follows.

The submit button on the left makes a submission for a normal transaction, while the button on the right will submit as a limit order.  In case of the Restricted Top of Stack limit orders only internal traders will see the new submission box.

Price of Limit Orders

Modify Limit Orders
 Customers now have the ability to modify the price of any active order. In order to do so highlight the order to be modified and use the plus or minus sign next to the price field on  at the top of the "Today's Orders" section. The price will move up or down in the same increments as the tick size for that product. Once the price is at the desired level click the "Set" button and the price will be modified. Another way to modify the price on a limit order is to click on the price field on a particular limit order.  You will see a box with plus, minus and set buttons that allow you to modify that order.

Expiration time for Limit Orders
Customers can now place limit orders with expiration times of up to 30 days. Currently they may place orders for only up to 12 hours.

Float the Today's Orders Section
You can now float the " Limit Order " section. In order to do so, right click in the "Today's Orders " section and select the float window option. In order to make the window " Stay On Top " right click on the floated window and select the stay on top option.

Mid Market Client - Mid market originators will now have the ability to transact on behalf of their customers, while including their desired margin on the trade, on EnronOnline products. In order to do so Click on the bid or offer price, a customised submission window will appear.  Select the counterparty for whom you wish to transact from a drop down list , enter the desired customer price and margin and click submit. For example if a customer wants to buy Nymex Sep 01 at 3.36 and you wish to have a 1 cent margin, please enter 3.36 as the desired price and 0.01 as the margin. The system will trade the order when the EnronOnline offer for Nymex Sep 01 is at 3.35, book the trade at 3.36 and record the 0.01 origination amount.

In order to be set up to use this functionality. Please call the EnronOnline Product Control Group.

Changes to Website Passwords - As an added security measure, which has been requested by many customers, some new password rules have been instituted. First, the password cannot be equal to the login ID. Second, each user will be prompted to change his password every 90 days. These rules apply to all website passwords for both internal and external users.

Please note  Stack Manager changes will be available all traders as of Monday August 20, 2001. The changes to the website will be rolled out to a few internal users on Monday with the rest of the internal users being upgraded Monday night, and external users by the end of the week.  Over the next couple of weeks all users will be prompted to change their website passwords.

If you have any questions regarding these changes please contact me at 713-853-1787.

Savita Puthigai

<Embedded Paintbrush Picture>


see below

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2001 01:43 PM -----

	"Cooper, Lance (LA)" <LACOOPER@dow.com>
	05/11/2001 12:34 PM

		 To: "'Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com'" <Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE:

One of them had diarrhea on Monday night / Tuesday morning.  I took her to
the vet and they gave me pills for her.  After that she has been fine.
Sounds like yours really had it bad.  Mine may not have had a virus though.
It may just have been coincidental.  I hope that Tizzer and Geronimo are
better now.  Hope that things are going well.  Our business, hence our
department also, announced that we will be cutting a few positions/people
very soon.  We are all laying low.  Oh well, we shall see.

Take care of you!

-----Original Message-----
From: Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com [mailto:Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 10:00 AM
To: lacooper@dow.com
Subject:

How are your dogs?  You should be aware there is a nasty virus going around
which both of mine have had concerning each end.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Hey guys,

We need to try and get this populated today and distributed.  Can each of you please take a look at the assigned section and let me know your comments.  The only thing we are trying to do here is identify the activities of the Estate and what needs to be performed by the resources in each group.

Cara & Mike will you please update the scheduling and trading areas?

Stacey, will you please update the risk area?

I will work on the settlements / volume Management and I will work with Dave Steiner on the IT section.

Thanks so much for everyone's help.  I'm sorry I'm out of the office today.  We really need to get this done ASAP to help management understand who is available to assist in this time of transition.

Thanks - MO

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	O'Neil, Murray P.
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 6:28 PM
To:	May, Tom
Cc:	Hall, Bob M; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Subject:	Portland Office Activities, Options  and Needs

Tom,

After our call today Mike Purcell and I spent a little time talking.  We also have some time schedule to Cara and Jeff Richter tomorrow  I have put together the attached  template which I will hopefully have filled out for you by tomorrow afternoon.

Our biggest concern today was how we would address the Real-Time scheduling requirements.  Mark Guzman is part of the estate and should be able to cover the day shift during the week and we can outsource to UBS to cover all the other shifts (Just a proposal).  In addition, Lester Rawson is part of the estate and has Real-Time experience and is also the individual who currently manages the El Paso obligations.

If you have any questions please give me a call @ 503-702-9846.

Thanks - MO


CGoering@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 09:00 and 12:00 - 23:00 in the May 3,
2001 Real-Time Market as well as the following hours per ECA20001006B to
verify
prices:

PJM: 00:00, 18:00, 22:00
OH:  00:00, 18:00, 22:00
HQ:  00:00, 09:00, 18:00, 22:00
NE:  00:00 - 12:00, 18:00 - 20:00, 22:00 - 23:00

Prices in the May 4, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be found
at
the following address on our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


Lucy, Scott Neal and I ( we run the East Gas business together) are likely to need a new assistant when and if this deal goes forward.  I have not checked with anyone and I don't want to mis-lead you but would like to know IF you would be interested if things move forward.

Frank


Vicki,

We'll find out more and get back to you.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854

	Vicki Sharp@EES
	07/09/2001 01:13 PM

		 To: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Article 2/Conf. Call - Sent on Behalf of Jeff Dodd

Mike , sue and  Jeff, Can you please track this down ASAP  and get an
assessment of this.  Jeff, I assume you will get our lobbyists involved.
Lets schedule a call  to discuss strategy, etc.
---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 07/09/2001 03:10
PM ---------------------------
From: Barbara N Gray/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/09/2001 03:06 PM
To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: FW: Article 2/Conf. Call - Sent on Behalf of Jeff Dodd

Vicki, I continue to work with "industry groups" on the proposed revisions to
Article 2 of the UCC.....in connection therewith, I received the following
with respect to CALIFORNIA consumers relating to choice of law proposed
legislation being proposed in California.  I am unsure what types of
transactions, if any EES pursues in CA, but am passing this on to you just in
case......a fate worse than death....to be within the clutches of left coast
consumer law!!!!!!   Hope all is well with and family   bng
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kaye Caldwell <KCaldwell-IA@ix.netcom.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Kaye+20Caldwell+20+3CKCaldwell-IA+40ix+2Enetcom+2Ecom+3E+40
ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 7:30 PM
To: SHADDIX, PEGGY; 'msbarranco@tpandh.com'; 'rberger@winston.com';
'lebrennan@msn.com'; 'K.Buford@motorola.com'; 'David.B.Cade@GM.com';
'ctc5@chrysler.com'; 'Susan_Carnahan@hp.com'; 'jcherry@snds.com';
'david.crane@autodesk.com'; 'DaviesToddE@JDCORP.DEERE.com';
'dcd1952@bellatlantic.com'; 'rfrank@enron.com'; 'egillas@ect.enron.com';
'bgray@ect.enron.com'; 'Bguge@californiasteel.com'; 'gdhailey@venable.com';
'ejh@whdlaw.com'; 'hillman@law.mail.cornell.edu'; 'lhoriszny@bwauto.com';
'huddlesone@aol.com'; 'olivia.iannicelli@nissan-usa.com'; 'joek@bsa.org';
'ckeeton@fbtlaw.com'; 'akoblenz@nada.org'; 'dland@affi.com';
'clockwood@aiam.org'; 'macdug@aol.com'; 'whannassoc@aol.com';
'Jen_Morris@hp.com'; 'dreiter@724.com'; 'law@nam.org'; 'drobbins@mpaa.org';
'msheriff@lsnlaw.com'; 'cla_silcox@nema.org'; 'hollyt@prestongates.com';
DODD, JEFF
Subject: Re: Article 2/Conf. Call - Sent on Behalf of Jeff Dodd

Those of you that are concerned about the changes to Article 1 (Change #6 in
Holly's memo) regarding choice of law might like to know about California AB
256, see text below.  It makes all non-California choice of law clauses
ineffective in electronic contracts with California consumers, and we think
it may be expanded to all consumer contracts (due to E-SIGN issues). We have
a working group of people opposing the bill, which has passed the Assembly
and is in the Senate.  THIS BILL IS QUITE LIKELY TO PASS.  So if you're
concerned please help us stop it!
Among numerous other problems, I think it would force all companies that sell
goods to California consumers with an express warranty to provide local
repair facilities or contract for local repair services (ie, it overturns the
Zeos case).
If you want to participate in the opposition working group please let me
know. (KCaldwell-IA@ix.netcom.com.)
- Kaye Caldwell
================= Text of AB 256 ===========================
1799.207. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if a consumer in this
state enters a consumer contract or other transaction for the purchase or
lease of goods or services primarily for personal, family, or household
purposes and the consumer contract or other agreement documenting the
transaction is created, generated, sent, communicated, received, or stored by
electronic means, all of the following apply: (a) The consumer contract or
transaction shall be governed by California law. (b) For the purpose of
applying the provisions of this part, the consumer contract or transaction
shall be deemed to have been made or to have occurred at the individual's
residence. (c) Any action arising from or connected with the consumer
contract or transaction that is commenced against the consumer shall be filed
in the county or judicial district in which the consumer resided at the time
the transaction was entered or resides at the time action is filed. (d) This
section may not be waived or varied by agreement. Any waiver of this section
is void and unenforceable as contrary to public policy.
================= End of Text of AB 256 ===========================
===================================
Kaye Caldwell,  California Policy Director
Internet Alliance http://www.internetalliance.org
E-mail: KCaldwell-IA@ix.netcom.com
Phone: (916) 486-6334, (202) 783-8677
Fax: (916) 313-3746, (202) 478-1804
===================================


Bert,
I put all the names in a hat...and you are the man...please revise the schedule and redistribute it with yourself attending the trip...
Enjoy!

-----Original Message-----
From: Meyers, Bert
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2001 8:18 AM
To: Williams III, Bill
Subject: FW: Balloon Fiesta Invitation from Dave Miller at PNM

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephens, Sandy [mailto:SSTEPHE@pnm.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 12:33 PM
To: Meyers, Bert
Subject: Balloon Fiesta Invitation from Dave Miller at PNM

<<...OLE_Obj...>> The Wholesale Power Marketing Group Invites You To Be Our Guest For The  2001 Fall Energy Fiesta!

The Wholesale Power Marketing Group cordially extends this invitation to join us Wednesday evening, October 10th through noon Friday, October 12th as a guest at our annual 2001 Fall Energy Fiesta!   This is an occasion to meet all the members of our team, tour our trading floor, explore possible business opportunities and of course, enjoy Albuquerque's historic International Balloon Fiesta!   As our guest, we will provide, at no expense to you, the following:

<<...OLE_Obj...>>

          -  Tickets to the Balloon Fiesta

-  Balloon rides (weather permitting)
- Ground transportation to and from the airport and throughout your stay
-       Shared lodging in a Class A Recreational Vehicle on-site at the Fiesta
-       Meals
-       Day sight-seeing and shopping trips to Santa Fe or complimentary golf
-       Fiesta memorabilia

You will be responsible for your travel to and from Albuquerque.
I have attached an RSVP form for you to fill out with certain information that is needed prior to your arrival.  Please fill it out and wither email it to me at sstephe@pnm.com < <mailto:sstephe@pnm.com>> or fax it to me at 505/855-6240.

Thanks.

<<RSVP Form.doc>>

And........If you decide to go,

1.  Please email me, call me or fill out the attached form and fax it back to me with your travel information as soon as you know it, so we can arrange times to meet you at the airport.

2.  In October, Albuquerque can be very cool.  Please bring a light jacket and/or sweater, and some warm clothes, as many of the events we will be hosting are outside.

3.  You will be lodging in a Class a RV on site at the Balloon Fiesta, with one of our other guests.  There will be 3 RV's that we have secured for our guests (6 guests in all), and these RV's will be parked in our own reserved area of the Balloon Fiesta.  This way, there will be no "early rising" to attend balloon events, as some of the start times for ascension events are 5:45AM - 7:00 AM!  And you will be in midst of all of the excitement.  These RV's are top of the line: roomy, comfortable, and well-stocked with all the necessities (snacks, drinks, toiletries, sheets, blankets, towels).

4.  All meals will be hosted by us, either at local restaurants or they will be professionally catered to our area.

We will also host an outing to Santa Fe; sightseeing and museums, or you can play golf instead (please indicate in your reply if you will be renting clubs or bringing your own).    We would also like to treat you to a balloon ride (weather permitting) if you are so inclined.  Just please note it on the attached sheet.

And last but not least, we would like you to provide us with your sweatshirt size so we can send you home with an official Balloon Fiesta sweatshirt.

I have enclosed a schedule of events for you to know what will be happening here at the Balloon Fiesta while you are here.

<<wave 2 schedule of events.doc>>

All of us at PNM's Wholesale Power Marketing are thrilled that you are coming!  If you have any questions, please feel free to call me.

Regards,

Sandy Stephens
Assistant to Duane Farmer
505/855-6202 direct line
505/855-6240 fax


Twanda, we need to revise Shankman's contract as described below.  Thanks a
lot!!  Michelle  (Memo to Oxley)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.
----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 06/20/2000 05:19 PM -----

	David Oxley
	06/20/2000 04:56 PM

		 To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Contract

Can you update draft and let me have a copy?

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by David Oxley/HOU/ECT on 06/20/2000 04:56
PM ---------------------------

Mary Joyce@ENRON
06/20/2000 04:19 PM
To: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pam
Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Contract

David,

Lets move forward!  Approved by Jeff.

Thanks!

MAry

David Oxley@ECT
06/16/2000 02:37 PM
To: Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Contract

Mary,

I spoke with Dave and Mark above below and have concluded that we would like
to go back to him with following offer. Before we do so can you make sure
this is OK with ENE OTC;

   Offered   His Counter  Proposed Compromise

Contract Term  2 years   Happy for 3  leave at 2

Base   $250   Agreed   No change
   $275 2/1/01

S/O Equity  None   $500k options  None

Bonus   $1.25mmTarget  $1.5mm Target(for 00) $1.5mmTarget (for 00)
      $1.25mm Target (for 01) $1.25mm Target (for 01)

ENE LTI   $1.25mmTarget  $1.5mm Target (for 00) $2mm Target (for 00)
      $1.25mm Target (for 01) $1.25mm Target (for 01)

All targets for top 25% performance.

David

---------------------- Forwarded by David Oxley/HOU/ECT on 06/16/2000 01:57
PM ---------------------------
From: Jeffrey A Shankman on 06/13/2000 02:25 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Contract

Following up from yesterday:

 Base--$250 effective at contract sign
 Base--$275 effective Feb 1, 2001
 (Already discussed)

 Bonus Target for Cal 2000  Bonus Target for Cal 2001
 Cash   1,500,000  Cash  1,250,000
 Stock/Opt 1,500,000   Stock Opt 1,250,000

Bonus Target for Cal 2000 assumes current performance, etc, etc.
Stock/Opt targets structured as program paid/participated in Bonus paid in
Cal 2000.
Also,
 Options on 100,000 shares of Enron (valued at current valuation) Struck on
date of contract execution with 25% vesting at contract signing, an 25% each
January thereafter.

Also,
 $500,000 interest free loan (between ENA and myself) payable back by
employment contract expiry.

Standard MD noncompete.
David, you had mentioned (at Cliffs suggestion a 2 year deal, but I'd be
happy to entertain 3 if you prefer).


His number is 52591.

Thank you for being a buddy.

Kristin

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Weldon, V. Charles
> Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 1:41 PM
> To:	Gandy, Kristin
> Subject:	RE: Summer Buddies
>
> Kristin,
>
> Can I get Michael Finger's phone number?  I've had no luck
> finding him.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Charlie
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Gandy, Kristin
> Sent:	Monday, June 04, 2001 2:56 PM
> To:	Weldon, V. Charles
> Subject:	Summer Buddies
>
>
>
> Dear Intern Buddy -
>
> Thank you for volunteering to assist the Analyst/Associate
> Program with candidate cultivation this summer.   Summer
> internships are very important to the overall success of our
> program and we need your help to insure that our interns have
> enjoyable and meaningful experiences this summer.
>
> We have assigned you to be Michael Finger's summer buddy.
>
> To kick off the summer, the A/A Program will be hosting a
> "Meet the Pool" party on Thursday June 7th at the Hyatt
> Regency from 5:00PM to 9:00 PM.
>
> We would like for you to use this opportunity to meet your
> summer buddy and to introduce them to others in the pool.
> Please make contact with your buddy as soon as possible to
> make plans to attend the party together.
>
> In addition to attending this party together, we would like
> for you to spend a little time each week with your buddy.
> We will send out an email next week with some suggested
> things for you and your buddy to do together.  Whether it is
> lunch or a simple phone call, your continued interaction with
> these interns could make a difference in the intern's
> decision to join Enron fulltime.  Suggestions from you are
> always welcomed!
>
> As we progress through the summer, please make an attempt to
> gain insight into your buddy's internship.  Any feedback from
> them regarding their summer experiences will be welcomed,
> positive or negative.
>
> If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
> me at x35275.
>
> Thanks again for your help.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Ted Bland
>


I think we need to get a lot closer together - I expect Geoff (and the
analyst working for Geoff on this) to be spending a lot more time down on the
IT floors.  If we integrate at a much earlier stage we might not see any
divergence from how Geoff sees the end result to what actually appears.

Could you consider how to get your team spending much more time with Geoff -
I would suggest you have a daily time when you all (developers included) sit
down around a desk to look at progress.

Let me know what you think?

Louise

From: Zhiyong Wei/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/06/2001 06:55 PM
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/ENRON@enronXgate, Beth
Perlman/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen Stock/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: Inception Document for GTV II phase II

Attached please find the Inception Document for Gas Trading Vision II Phase
II. I would appreciate your comments. I will be circulating the document for
signatures on Wednesday. Please provide your inputs by then.

Thanks

Zhiyong


We don't have storage on PG&E do we?  I think that is park and lend.  What do
you think?  I have put together the schedules for Spindletop and Bammel.

Dave

---------------------- Forwarded by David Baumbach/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001
01:55 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jim Pond @ ENRON                           03/12/2001 12:47 PM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimat
Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Greg Whiting/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Physical Storage

Please provide the information requested below as soon as possible.
Improvement in this process will help minimize flash-to-actual variances.

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimat Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Physical Storage

Has any progress been made on this?  So far, I have only received information
on Cove Point.

We show that there is physical storage on the following pipelines:

CENTRAL -  Mid Continent, Moss Bluff, NGPL, and Reliant.
TEXAS - Bammel, Centana, and PG&E Texas Pipeline.
WEST - Colorado, PG&E (one contract), PG&E Gas Transmission Northwest,
Questar, and Williston
EAST - Cove Point, Dominion, Columbia Gas, Gulf South (Koch), National Fuel,
Sonat, Tennessee, Transco, Egan, and Napoleonville.
SITHE - Union

Please provide the requested information below.

Thanks for your help in this matter.

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Physical Storage

Gas Accounting is initiating a project to ensure consistent treatment of
physical storage between flash and the GL.  To that end, please provide the
book codes and cost of inventory schedules that you have for each of the
physical storage facilities.  We will also need what you show as the 1/31/01
inventory balance for each.

David,
I believe that we already have the information for Bammel.  Please provide
the info for other Texas desk storage, if any.

I would like to have this information as soon as possible.

Thanks, everyone.


Kerry, I think I sent a letter and a check for partial payment last week.
Let me know if you don't get it in the next few days.  Michelle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.

	"Notestine, Kerry" <KNotestine@littler.com>
	06/25/2000 12:10 PM

		 To: "'michelle.cash@enron.com'" <michelle.cash@enron.com>
		 cc: "Carrol, Robert" <RCarrol@littler.com>
		 Subject: Pittsburg Matter

Michelle:

Remember the issue with the second opinion on antitrust that we had on the
Pittsburg California matter?  We have about a $10,000 bill that we paid to
the other law firm that did the opinion.  You indicated that you had known
about the opinion, but expected something much less expensive.  Of course,
we also sent you the bill several months after the matter concluded.  Any
indication if Enron will pay any part of that bill?  If not, let me know, so
that I can write it off and you will not continue to get reminder notices.
Thanks.

Kerry E Notestine
Littler Mendelson, PC
1900 Chevron Tower
1301 McKinney Street
Houston, Texas 77010
713.652.4748
713.951.9212 (fax)
knotestine@littler.com
www.littler.com

----
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply
email and delete all copies of this message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@littler.com

Littler Mendelson, P.C.
http://www.littler.com


Tana,

Finally, here is the deal you requested.

Thanks,
Joe


Kim,  I made a few tweaks to the letter.  Nothing substantial.  I still have
a few questions noted and some dates that need to be filled in. Please review.


Please review the attached deal for credit approval.

thank you,
Kimberly Hundl x31647


I'll look at Michael's CA and Sr. Sole' will take care of the native
Americans.

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           04/18/2001 09:40 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Seminole Electric CA

RE:  Michael Brown's CA - entity name
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 04/18/2001
09:39 AM ---------------------------
From: Michael Brown/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/18/2001 09:25 AM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Seminole Electric CA

 Company: 1st Rochdale Cooperative NYC
   465 Grand Street
   2nd Floor
   New York, NY 10002

 Contact: Gregory L. Wortham
   Vice President & Cheif Operating Officer

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Carnahan, Kathleen
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 9:01 AM
To: Mann, Kay; Sole, Carlos
Cc: Gimble, Mathew; Brown, Michael
Subject: Seminole Electric CA

I will prepare a first draft of this requested CA for Matt Gimble
(bialateral) in connection with discussions with Seminole Electric
Cooperative, Inc. out of Tampa, Florida.

Additionally, Michael Brown has requested a bilateral CA with an entity (name
unknown at this time) that is a load aggrigator and site developer.  Enron
will be giving proposals, ideas and "propriatary intelectual capital" and the
term will be for 1 year.  The catch is, Michael wants language in the CA that
the "Unknown at this time party" can not shop our proposals.  I will work on
a first draft of this one too.

Kathleen
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 04/18/2001
08:49 AM ---------------------------

	  From:  Mathew Gimble @ ECT                           04/17/2001 05:37 PM

To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: David Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate, Bruce
Golden/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Seminole Electric CA

Kate,

Regarding the Confidentiality Agreement that we need for Seminole Electric,
the following are the items that we would like to include:

One year term
Construction of a 500 - 1,200MW coal facility expansion to Seminole's
Palatka, FL power plant
Construction of a 500 - 1,200MW coal facility at Seminole's Taylor Co., FL
site
plus whatever confidentiality lingo that is normally added

Let me know what I left out (David? Bruce?)

Thanks,
Mathew


Ben,
I have worked with the model some more this morning.  Please take a look at
the most recent version.  Currently, Mitch is reviewing it for further needed
changes.


Rick,

It would be difficult to use option approach to directly to ships (no
historical price series
and no regular, continuos markets). The right approach  is th  real options
model that
requiresa lot of time to develop.

From:  Rick Buy
05/22/2000 01:35 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Exmar Purchase Decision

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2000 01:34 PM
---------------------------

John Sherriff
05/22/2000 01:21 PM
To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Doug
Rotenberg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick
Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Exmar Purchase Decision

I just got off the phone with Jeff Skilling to make my pitch for doing the
Exmar deal.  He said that he generally understands the logic of the deal but
simply
wants the risk management discipine applied to analzing the position (a
reiteration of what Rick Buy had said in our meeting today).  I would simply
ask Vince's team to take a quick look tommorow at valuing the ships as stand
alone positions with a guess at the volatility based on historical price
movements.   This would
be much easier than the Rainbow option approach and would allow us to roughly
look at the value of the options on the other two ships.  In other words we
could look at two ship  long positions with some implied volatilities and
also estimate daily VARs on the ships as if they were mark to market
(although I agree with David that we will not likely be able to mark the
ships because they will be treated as leases).

John

John
---------------------- Forwarded by John Sherriff/LON/ECT on 22/05/2000 19:05
---------------------------

Joe Gold
22/05/2000 18:58
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Exmar Purchase Decision

John,

After spending a few minutes with our shipping experts in the coal and oil
groups, I have a slightly different angle on the Exmar LNG vessel decision.
I would ideally like to spend the time to analyse this purchase as we do
power and gas positions.  Unfortunately, we do not have that luxury and
sometimes, in absence of true analytics, the most rudimentary measures can
provide the best decision tools.  Here is how we would make the decision:

1)  Our shipping expert confirms that $140 million for a 135,000 ton ship
represents a good price relative to new build costs over the last three years
and that quotes have been trending up past that number recently.  He also
confirms that the current trough is the result of the default of several Far
East buyers and that new LNG orders and other ship building (cruise liners)
have reduced the over capacity.  His experience and historic analysis has
suggested that the pricing cycle for LNG ships lasts for a significant
period.  New efficiency measures should reduce new build prices (and allow
for a lower trough), but not by an extreme amount versus the $140 million
cost of this vessel.

Pierre normally likes to roll time charters; however, this is difficult in an
illiquid shipping market like LNG.  He would purchase this ship if the LNG
shipping book were his to manage.  He estimates the ship could be sold in a
distressed sale for $110 million and could be potentially time chartered on a
long term basis at a value of up to $200 million.

2)  Our development teams in Spain, Italy and Turkey have been trying to
solve the big question - gas.  In each country, the key to developing a
merchant plant is securing gas flexibility or at least securing negotiating
leverage with the monopoly gas supplier.  It is questionable whether or not
this decision will have an immediate impact on Arcos.  The plant's time line
and the realities of the LNG supply market may require that we commit to Gas
Natural before any source of 3 to 5 year gas can be secured.   The shear
threat of being able to bring spot or term LNG to these markets will improve
our negotiating leverage and/or allow us to create flexibility.  Going
forward, however, other potential plant opportunities in Spain, and elsewhere
in the Med region, may have the capacity to utilise these vessels.   I think
that this flexibility is worth at least $25 million to me.

3)  I would summarise:   Upside   $60 + $25 = $85 million
     Downside           ($30) + $25 =             ($5)  million

I would do it.

I will leave the rest to you.

Joe


Hey Patrice,
I realize that you are a busy girl, but I would appreciate it if you could find some time to fill out the performance evaluations for Margie Straight and Jessica White.  Your opinion does matter in that these girls are new to the gates and I need to make sure that you feel that your needs are addressed.
Thanks Lisa


I understand from Cleary Gottlieb (counsel for the bondholders steering
committee) that various objections have been filed to the claims filed in the
Thai bankruptcy proceedings.? Apparently the committee has objected to some
claims, including claims filed by the Thai banks, and the Thai banks have
filed objections to others, including the claims filed by Chase as indenture
trustee. The lawyer at Cleary did not know whether any objections to Enron's
claim had been filed, but is trying to track down a list of all of the
objections and send it to me.

Have you received notice of any objections to Enron's claims?? I would also
be interested in any information you might be able to obtain regarding other
significant objections.? Cleary indicates that the Thai bankruptcy court will
be conducting hearings on the claims objections from late September through
the end of October.? Could you please provide confirmation or an update
regarding that process?

Thank you.? I hope all is well.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Mellencamp [mailto:Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 7:01 AM
To: richard.smith@linklaters.com; tkreller@milbank.com
Cc: Richard B Sanders
Subject: nsm

richard, thanks for your confirm as to filing.
what can we expect re the objection process? timeline, formal objection
process
etc?? how will our contingent indemnity claim be handled?
can you look to see what indenture trustee filed? whether other underwriters
filed claims such as our indemnity claim? i am sure the documents are
voluminous, but we would be interested in a summary.
thanks for your quick help and diligence.
feel free to email us as progresses. please copy both richard sanders and
myself. richard.sanders@enron.com.

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX? 77002
Tel:? (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.


Is Kathy here?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Please read

DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001
02:14 PM ---------------------------

Stacey Vallejo
02/26/2001 12:37 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Luchas Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Aquila Canada Corp. deals in your books

I just came across a counterparty that needs to be flipped to the
FT-US/CAND-ERMS book for all deals in Houston books.  ECC has now signed a
Master Swap Agreement with Aquila Canada Corp., and all deals traded with ENA
and Aquila Canada Corp. need to be settled with ECC in the P& book.  These
deals are showing up in TAGG as settling with ENA, could you all please keep
an eye out for deals with this company and flip them right away.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this.

Thanks
Stacey


-----Original Message-----
From: J. Bennett [mailto:edge@buyers-edge.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:56 AM
To: Lenart, Kirk
Subject: [Fwd: FSBO Home]

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <SUlrich@palomaec.com>
To: edge@buyers-edge.com
Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2001 8:42:46 GMT
Subject:

Since you are a buyer's agent, we thought you might have a buyer for our
property.

Please see attached flyer if you are interested.

Thank you,
Sheila Ullrich

 <<guyflyer3.doc>>


Dear Gerald R Nemec,

Good news! The credit line on your Capital Onec card has been
increased to $15,000.00*. This additional credit is available for you to
use right now!

Take advantage of your credit line increase to purchase a new
computer or to go on vacation. Or, consider the Capital One Smart
Switch(SM) program, which lets you transfer balances from your
higher-interest-rate credit and charge cards to your Capital One
account at your current Fixed?9.9% APR!

Check out our Balance Transfer Calculator to see how much you
can save!

Why Smart Switch?
Smart Switch is a smart move because you could save hundreds of
dollars in interest every year by transferring higher-interest-rate
balances. Plus, it lets you write just one check at bill-paying time
-- and there's no transfer fee! Why pay more interest than you have
to? Make the switch by calling 1-800-955-7070 today!

It's Our Way of Saying "Thanks"
We hope you enjoy the extra financial flexibility your new credit
line provides. It's our way of saying thanks for being a Preferred
Capital One cardholder.

Sincerely,

P. Schnall
Senior Vice President, Capital One

P.S. Now it's easier than ever to get the things you want or need.
Take advantage of your increased line of credit today!

_____________________________________________________________________
Important Information from Capital One:

You received this e-mail because you provided Capital One with your
e-mail address. Your e-mail address is part of your personal
information, and Capital One and its business partners are committed
to providing meaningful privacy protection for their customers. To
protect your privacy, please do not send sensitive account
information through e-mail. If you would like more information about
Capital One's Privacy Statement, please visit:
http://www.capitalone.com/legal/privacy.shtml

If you would like to be excluded from all future e-mail offers from
Capital One and its trusted business partners, including information
about new benefits, products and services, please visit:
http://capital1.m0.net/m/u/cap/c.asp?e=gerald.nemec%40enron.com

Capital One is a federally registered service mark of Capital One
Financial Corporation. All rights reserved. , 2001 Capital One
Financial Corporation. E010605

#66765


New deal number is 229481

SUSAN SMITH @
ECT
03/27/2000 02:24 PM

To: Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: FIRST DELIVERY - TEXACO E & P

Tom:

 Would you please set up another one month ticket for the below (last month
was 211573)?

Julie:
 Per Melissa's note please do not send out any paper on this. We expect the
paper within a day or so.

Please let me know if you have any questions,

Thanks, SCS x 33321
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Smith/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000 02:20
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           03/27/2000 02:12 PM

To: Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: FIRST DELIVERY - TEXACO E & P

Yes, but I would request that Julie not send out paper since this should be
back signed shortly.  I noticed the deal Vance requested below (which Tom set
up as deal 211573) is attached to a committed reserves agreement that does
not cover this meter.

Melissa

SUSAN
SMITH
03/27/2000 12:27 PM

To: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FIRST DELIVERY - TEXACO E & P

Can we just use this for April rather then putting in a one month firm ticket
(since we dont have paper anyway)?

Thanks,

SCS
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Smith/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000 12:24
PM ---------------------------

Vance L Taylor
03/03/2000 04:30 PM
To: Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FIRST DELIVERY - TEXACO E & P

Tom,

The following production has commenced to flow  and a ticket should be
generated in sitara based upon the information below:

Counterparty   Meter   Volumes  Price     Period

Texaco E & P   9826   2,000mmbtu/d  100% IF/HSC less $0.09  3/3 - 3/31/2000

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353

---------------------- Forwarded by Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2000
04:14 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Esther Buckley                           03/03/2000 01:23 PM

To: Molly L Carriere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne E
Lightfoot/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael W Morris/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cheryl Jones/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Reid Hansen/GCO/Enron@Enron, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Austin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heidi Withers/HOU/ECT@ECT, J R
Fosdick/GCO/Enron@Enron, Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FIRST DELIVERY - TEXACO E & P

See attached file


Hi Matthew-

SIGMA FACTOR REQUEST:
Commercial has requested the following new WTI physical product type on
EnronOnline.  The product type is similar to the US Crude WTI Phy Index
except that the index is a "Basis" spread between Platt's WTI and another
designated Platt's index (the list of all the other Platt's index choices is
shown further below).  The delivery location is at Cushing, Oklahoma.:

US MTBE Swap   Platts GC WB  Mo/Yr  USD/Gl-b

New Product TypeCommodity:
Product Type:   US Crude WTI Phy Basis
Commodity: Crude Oil (WTI)
Currency:     USD
Default UOM:   Barrels per day
Country:   USA

e.g.:  PRODUCT :  US WTI Phy Basis PlattsMidl C-OK  Month/Year USD/bbl

A US Crude Transaction with Enron Reserve Acquisition Corp., under which the
Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall purchase the agreed quantity of West
Texas Intermediate crude oil deemed gravity 40 API at the Contract Price. The
Contract Price shall be derived from the Index, as adjusted by the price
submitted by Counterparty via the website.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date to the
Termination Date. The Effective Date is [day/month/year]. The Termination
Date is [day/month/year].

The Transaction is for delivery to the Cushing, Oklahoma U.S.A. TEPPCO Crude
Pipeline, L.P.

The Index for each calendar month shall be the difference between (i) the
mean of the daily first line quotations for WTI/(MONTH) under the heading
"U.S. $/Bbl" in the Crude Price Assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price
Report for those issues published for such month, minus (ii) the average of
the mean of the daily quotations for WTI Midland under the heading "U.S.
$/Bbl" in the Crude Price assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price Report
for those issues published for the applicable calendar month.

The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.

The unit of measure in which the price is quoted is in Barrels per day and
the quantity shown shall be in Barrels per day.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Index options that may be used with this product type are as follows:
The Index for each calendar month shall be the difference between (i) the
mean of the daily first line quotations for WTI/(MONTH) under the heading
"U.S. $/Bbl" in the Crude Price Assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price
Report for those issues published for such month, minus (ii) the average of
the mean of the daily quotations for Bonito under the heading "U.S. $/Bbl" in
the Crude Price assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price Report for those
issues published for the applicable calendar month.
The Index for each calendar month shall be the difference between (i) the
mean of the daily first line quotations for WTI/(MONTH) under the heading
"U.S. $/Bbl" in the Crude Price Assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price
Report for those issues published for such month, minus (ii) the average of
the mean of the daily quotations for  WTS under the heading "U.S. $/Bbl" in
the Crude Price assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price Report for those
issues published for the applicable calendar month.
The Index for each calendar month shall be the difference between (i) the
mean of the daily first line quotations for WTI/(MONTH) under the heading
"U.S. $/Bbl" in the Crude Price Assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price
Report for those issues published for such month, minus (ii) the average of
the mean of the daily quotations for LLS under the heading "U.S. $/Bbl" in
the Crude Price assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price Report for those
issues published for the applicable calendar month.
The Index for each calendar month shall be the difference between (i) the
mean of the daily first line quotations for WTI/(MONTH) under the heading
"U.S. $/Bbl" in the Crude Price Assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price
Report for those issues published for such month, minus (ii) the average of
the mean of the daily quotations for HLS under the heading "U.S. $/Bbl" in
the Crude Price assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price Report for those
issues published for the applicable calendar month.
The Index for each calendar month shall be the difference between (i) the
mean of the daily first line quotations for WTI/(MONTH) under the heading
"U.S. $/Bbl" in the Crude Price Assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price
Report for those issues published for such month, minus (ii) the average of
the mean of the daily quotations for Wyo. Sweet under the heading "U.S.
$/Bbl" in the Crude Price assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price Report
for those issues published for the applicable calendar month.
The Index for each calendar month shall be the difference between (i) the
mean of the daily first line quotations for WTI/(MONTH) under the heading
"U.S. $/Bbl" in the Crude Price Assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price
Report for those issues published for such month, minus (ii) the average of
the mean of the daily quotations for Eugene Island under the heading "U.S.
$/Bbl" in the Crude Price assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price Report
for those issues published for the applicable calendar month.
The Index for each calendar month shall be the difference between (i) the
mean of the daily first line quotations for WTI/(MONTH) under the heading
"U.S. $/Bbl" in the Crude Price Assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price
Report for those issues published for such month, minus (ii) the average of
the mean of the daily quotations for Mars under the heading "U.S. $/Bbl" in
the Crude Price assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price Report for those
issues published for the applicable calendar month.
The Index for each calendar month shall be the difference between (i) the
mean of the daily first line quotations for WTI/(MONTH) under the heading
"U.S. $/Bbl" in the Crude Price Assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price
Report for those issues published for such month, minus (ii) the average of
the mean of the daily quotations for Kern Riverunder the heading "U.S. $/Bbl"
in the Crude Price assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price Report for
those issues published for the applicable calendar month.
The Index for each calendar month shall be the difference between (i) the
mean of the daily first line quotations for WTI/(MONTH) under the heading
"U.S. $/Bbl" in the Crude Price Assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price
Report for those issues published for such month, minus (ii) the average of
the mean of the daily quotations for ANS(Cal) under the heading "U.S. $/Bbl"
in the Crude Price assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price Report for
those issues published for the applicable calendar month.
The Index for each calendar month shall be the difference between (i) the
mean of the daily first line quotations for WTI/(MONTH) under the heading
"U.S. $/Bbl" in the Crude Price Assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price
Report for those issues published for such month, minus (ii) the average of
the mean of the daily quotations for Basrah Lt under the heading "U.S. $/Bbl"
in the Crude Price assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price Report for
those issues published for the applicable calendar month.
The Index for each calendar month shall be the difference between (i) the
mean of the daily first line quotations for WTI/(MONTH) under the heading
"U.S. $/Bbl" in the Crude Price Assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price
Report for those issues published for such month, minus (ii) the average of
the mean of the daily quotations for Poseidon under the heading "U.S. $/Bbl"
in the Crude Price assessments section of Platt's Oilgram Price Report for
those issues published for the applicable calendar month.


FYI,

Please, check with Shirley.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001
08:27 AM ---------------------------

"Connie Tadesse" <connie@fea.com> on 03/19/2001 06:20:56 PM
Please respond to <connie@fea.com>
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: <accounting@fea.com>
Subject: Payment Reminder

Dear Vince,

Our record indicates that payment for invoice number 2001-M608 in the amount
of $5,700.- has not been received.  Please send your payment at your
earliest convenience.  Your timely attention to this matter will be greatly
appreciated.  If you have any questions or need further information, please
feel free to contact us.

Thank you very much for your assistance in this matter.

Sincerely,
Connie Tadesse
Accounting Manager
Financial Engineering Associates., Inc
Telephone Number 510-549-8702, ext 104
Fax Number 510-548-0332