TD{FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; BACKGROUND-COLOR: white}
[IMAGE]

Now that you have access to the following applications without requiring VPN access...  Outlook Web Access (email and calendar) PEP XMS (Expense Reporting application)  And, COMING SOON... eHROnline (year-end) Benefits Election (Oct. 29, 2001) Electronic Pay Stubs (year-end), and Much More,  through the ClickAtHome Portal and the Internet, do you still believe you need remote access through VPN from home to Enron networks (must have a valid business reason with supervisor approval and a monthly cost)?   YES NO NOT SURE Please answer this survey from your computer at work, not via Outlook Web Access.


Here are yesterday's numbers:

Total Transactions = 6,556
Total Users Transacting = 1,227
Total Number of Counterparties = 309

Eric


Here's ad campaign that I found through Olivia( Davis's person in D.C.)
....if this is it , not so bad.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 03/23/2001
11:58 AM ---------------------------

"Olivia Morgan" <omorgan@deweysquare.com> on 03/23/2001 11:41:48 AM
To: "Richard (Rick) Shapiro (E-mail)" <rshapiro@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: EFC Thank you e-mails to Board Members & Misc

Rick -  In case Enron wants to sign on...here's the info on the Energy ads
group I know  of.? The second attachment is a radio script.? Nothing
negative!?  Olivia
?
?
-----Original Message-----
From: Alix Burns  [mailto:aburns@technet.org]

Hi all,

1.? I have drafted an e-mail that should come from  John and should to go to
the Board Members who have signed on to Energy for  California. This will go
out with the attached information from Steve Lucas  about the legal/donation
rules for the organization and the latest radio script  (Rick -please confirm
this is it. We will re-name it.? Thanks).

Please confirm for me that all of the Board Members  agreed to write or raise
$50,000.?

<<Thank you email.doc>>  <<Hauck version of radio  spot- draft 2.doc>>
<<ContributorInfoPacket-Word.doc>>

Energy for California Board Members

- John Doerr plus

1.? Chris Townsend:??  tpa@sjrd.com
2.? Dan Case:  dan.case@chase.com?? cc: nancy.pfund@chase.com
3.? Reed Hastings:? rhastings@netflix.com
4.? Bill Hauck:? bhauck@cbrt.org
5. Carl Guardino:? cguardino@svmg.org

2.? Angela, can we schedule some time for me to come  to KPCB and get the
general e-mails out so we can wrap up our fundraising  commitment?

Many thanks.

-Alix

Alix Burns
TechNet
(650) 213-1177
<<Alix Burns (E-mail).vcf>>

 - Thank you email.doc
 - Hauck version of radio spot- draft 2.doc
 - ContributorInfoPacket-Word.doc
 - Alix Burns (E-mail).vcf


He started to cry last night when you said you were not going to sign him
up.  I think we can.  Starting Sep 1, I will not be running a book.  I will
be able to leave at a decent hour on scheduled days.  So I will be able to
help.  Let me know what you think.

DG

"KRISTI GIRON" <KRISTI.GIRON@cfisd.net> on 08/23/2000 01:40:40 PM
To: <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: I love you. Hope you had a good flight. Call me.

LET'S TALK ABOUT BASEBALL FOR CHRISTOPHER.  I'M REALLY GOING TO NEED YOUR
HELP.  THINK WE CAN DO IT?

>>> <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com> 08/23/00 12:55PM >>>

I'm in the office.  You need to look a a calendar to see when you can come
up here.  Hopefully for a weekend the Cubs are in town.  I love you.

DG


I don't have anything to do with LJM, BUT the e-mail retention policy certainly wiped
      out all my correspondence

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Jim Derrick@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:55 PM
To:	All Enron Worldwide@ENRON
Subject:	Important Announcement Regarding Document Preservation

As you know, Enron, its directors, and certain current and former officers are defendants in litigation in Federal and State court involving the LJM partnerships.

Enron has employed counsel and they will represent Enron and its interests in the litigation.

Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, we are required to preserve documents that might be used in the litigation.

Accordingly, our normal document destruction policies are suspended immediately and shall remain suspended until further notice.

Please retain all documents (which include handwritten notes, recordings, e-mails, and any other method of information recording) that in any way relate to the Company's related party transactions with LJM 1 and LJM 2, including, but not limited to, the formation of these partnerships, any transactions or discussions with the partnerships or its agents, and Enron's accounting for these transactions.

You should know that this document preservation requirement is a requirement of Federal law and you could be individually liable for civil and criminal penalties if you fail to follow these instructions.

You should know that Enron will defend these lawsuits vigorously.  In the meantime, you should not discuss matters related to the lawsuits with anyone other than the appropriate persons at Enron and its counsel.

If you have any questions, please contact Jim Derrick at 713-853-5550.


Please find attached the PIP master list and the first set of PIP documents
for your review prior to the RUG meeting. As requested, the PIP master list
identifies items which are believe to require input and/or vote from RUG.

The PIP items that I currently have as requiring as RUG vote (based on the
notes) are as follows:

108 --sub QSE (payment process, invoicing, and liability) --proposal by C.
Moseley
200 and 104 --LSE/QSE Load Ration (at the QSE or LSE level) --proposal by B.
Jones
146 --Notifications vs. posting of Loss Factors
187 --TX SET Concurrent Processing approach --proposal by B. White
204 --EPS Meter Data Transmittal --proposal by J. Cohea

PIP item 112 (BUL) will be delivered tomorrow, as there is still some
follow-up regarding the formula.  When it is completed, it will be sent out
to this exploder.

If there is a PIP item missing from this grouping, please check the master
list, as it may have been resolved or merged with another item during the
PIP process.

Best regards,
Vikki Gates
Structure Consulting Group
vikki.gates@scgo.com
cell: 512.350.4020
@ERCOT: 512.248.3884

 - PIP100_130.zip
 - PIP_Master_List.xls


done

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alatorre, Carlos
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:44 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: Gentor CA

Yes, please sign it. That CA was for the Mexicali project (FAPSA), but I think there could be other opportunities with Gentor.
Thanks!
Carlos

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:39 AM
To:	Alatorre, Carlos
Subject:	Gentor CA

Before Matt left he deposited a confidentiality agreement on my  desk which dates back to August 6,  2001.  Jaime has it now.  What do you want me to do with it?  Sign it?


Looks good, except for the comments on "discourages generation".  Make it
"discourages peaking generation".

Although I agree that any price cap has a "discouraging " impact on the
generation market, it is a matter of degree in this sound bite environment.
To the point, without a creative exit strategy, I would not waste development
money on a 10000-13000 BTU/KWh heat rate peaking project.  However, even with
the FERC order, I will continue to spend money developing base load, 7000
BTU/KWh heat rate projects.  The state is tremendously short on power, the
price cap goes away (theoretically) in two years, $150 is well above the
average expected price in our forcast models (although I agree not above the
price for particular hours if scalers are applied.)

	James D Steffes@ENRON
	11/01/2000 11:39 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Message Points

I agree with much of what Jeff has written.  Here are some additions -

On FERC getting a lot right, look at the Order in relation to our 4 key
points filed in the White Paper -
Removing Market Transparency - Still need FERC to take action
Development of Forwards Market and Risk Management - Great results
Removing distortions on Prices - Wrong action
Ending Cal ISO / Cal PX Stakeholder Boards - Great results

On the risk management issue, FERC itself said "The single most important
remedy that California market needs is the elimination of rules that prevent
market participants from managing risk". [FERC PRESS RELEASE]

ADD - FERC Staff did a great job on preparing a detailed analysis of the
market issues.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	11/01/2000 01:17 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
skean@enron.com, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Message Points

Here are the messages as I understand them.  Please let me know if I've
misconstrued anything.  Thanks.

FERC got  a lot right in the order and we're very encouraged as a result.
In particular, ending the PX buy/sell requirement and permitting utilities to
manage risk through a portfolio of short and long term contracts is a
fundamental step in the right direction.
However, the proposed price cap is unworkable and will jeopardize realibility
in California.  As structured, it will:
discourage the development of new generation to serve California
fail to provide adequate incentives for demand responsiveness.
force Enron to abandon 300 MWs of new power projects planned for California.
We look forward to participating in FERC's process and are hopeful that
FERC's final order will fix the deficiencies in the current price cap
proposal.
We encourage California to work with FERC to implement the proposals and
quickly fix the flaws in the market on behalf of the state's consumers.


Start Date: 1/10/02; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011024.txt


So do we now have an Enovate/enovate?

Thanks,

Kay


Attendees:	Hunter Shively
		John Lavorato
		John Arnold
		Scott Neal
		Tom Martin
		Mike Grigsby


I show that we adjusted pricing for excess volumes for the following dates:

Mar 11-31    15,000/day delivered to Mobil Beaumont at IF HSC - .045

April 5-19 15,000/day delivered to Mobil Beaumont at IF HSC - .055.  An
outage occurred on the 5th, so the deliveries to Mobil didn't acutally start
until the   12th.

If you need anything else, let me know.

Daren

"Bruce McMills" <bmcmills@duke-energy.com> on 08/30/2000 01:28:47 PM
To: dfarmer@enron.com
cc: "Marta K Henderson" <mkhenderson@duke-energy.com>
Subject: Discrepancies in Price of Gas redelivered at Mobil Beaumont

I thought it might be easier to reply by email of the
period, volume, and price for periods when the
price for gas redelivered by Duke at Mobil Beaumont was not
HSC Monthly Index - $.0375.


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000
06:58 PM ---------------------------

Angela Barnett
06/12/2000 06:20 AM
To: lsharis@msn.com, Regina Blackshear/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eve Puckett/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Fwd: A Prayer for Angels

---------------------- Forwarded by Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2000
06:19 AM ---------------------------

Topey0661@aol.com on 06/11/2000 08:45:43 AM
To: Angela.Barnett@enron.com, BDin64@aol.com, cenriquez@usaid.gov,
anabellagra1@hotmail.com, knvjmvgnv@yahoo.com, kittenkid_65@yahoo.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: A Prayer for Angels

Return-Path: <kittenkid_65@yahoo.com>
Received: from  rly-yh05.mx.aol.com (rly-yh05.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.37])
by air-yh05.mail.aol.com (v74.10) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 17:14:27 -0400
Received: from  web701.mail.yahoo.com (web701.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.21])
by rly-yh05.mx.aol.com (v74.16) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 17:14:09 -0400
Received: (qmail 14535 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jun 2000 21:14:08 -0000
Message-ID: <20000610211408.14534.qmail@web701.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [152.163.201.202] by web701.mail.yahoo.com; Sat, 10 Jun 2000
14:14:08 PDT
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 14:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mary Westbrook <kittenkid_65@yahoo.com>
Subject: A Prayer for Angels
To: Angie Barnett <Angela.Barnett@enron.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Unknown

>>
>>                               A Prayer For Angels
>>
>>Barbara was driving her six-year-old son, Benjamin,
to his piano
lesson.
>>They were late, and Barbara was beginning to think
she should
>>have canceled it.  There was always so much to do,
and Barbara, a
>>night-duty nurse at the local hospital, had recently
worked extra
shifts.
>>She was tired.  The sleet storm and icy roads added
to her tension.
>>Maybe she should turn the car around.  "Mom!" Ben
cried. "Look!" Just
>>ahead a car had lost control on a patch of ice. As
Barbara tapped the
>>brakes, the other car spun wildly rolled over, then
crashed sideways
>>into a telephone pole.
>>Barbara pulled over skidded to a stop and threw open
her
>>door. Thank goodness she was a nurse-she might be
able to help these
>>unfortunate passengers.  Then she paused.  What
about Ben?  She
couldn't
>>take him with her. Little boys shouldn't see scenes
like the one she
>>anticipated.  But was it safe to leave him alone?
What if their car
were
>>hit
>>from behind? For a brief moment Barbara considered
going on her way.
>>Someone else was sure to come along.  No!  "Ben,
honey, promise me
>>you'll stay in the car!"
>>"I will, Mommy," he said as she ran, slipping and
sliding, toward
>>the crash site. It was worse than she'd feared.  Two
girls of high
>>school age are in the car. One, the blonde on the
passenger side, was
>>dead, killed on impact.
>>The driver, however was still breathing.  She was
unconscious and
>>pinned in the wreckage.  Barbara quickly applied
pressure to the
>>wound in the teenager's head while her practiced eye
catalogued the
other
>>injuries.  A broken leg, maybe two, along  with
probable internal
>>bleeding.
>>
>>But if help came soon, the girl would live.
>>A trucker had pulled up and was calling for help on
his cellular
phone.
>>Soon Barbara heard the ambulance sirens.
>>A few moments later she surrendered her lonely post
to rescue
workers.
>>"Good job," one said as he examined the driver's
wounds.
>>"You probably saved her life, ma'am."  Perhaps. But
as Barbara
>>walked back to her car a feeling of sadness
overwhelmed her,
especially
>>for the family of the girl who had died.  Their
lives would never be
the
>>same. Oh God, why do such things have to happen?
Slowly Barbara
opened
>>her
>>car
>>door.  What should she tell Benjamin?  He was
staring at the crash
>>site, his blue eyes huge.   "Mom," he whispered,
"did you see it?"
>>" See what,  Honey?" she asked.  "The angel, Mom!
He came down from
>>the sky while you were running to the car.
>>And he opened the door, and he took that girl out."
>>
>>Barbara's eyes filled with tears. "Which door, Ben?"
>>"The passenger side. He took the girl's hand, and
they floated
>>up to Heaven together."
>>"What about the driver?"
>>Ben shrugged. "I didn't see anyone else."
>>Later Barbara was able to meet the families of the
victims.
>>They expressed their gratitude for the help she had
provided.
Barbara
>>was able to give them something more - Ben's vision.
 There was no
way he
>>could have known-by ordinary means-who was in the
car or what had
>>happened to either of the passengers. Nor could the
passenger door
have
>>been opened; Barbara had seen it's tangle of
immovable steel
herself.
>>Yet
>>Ben's account brought consolation to a grieving
family.
>>Their daughter was safe in Heaven.  And they would
see her again.
>>
>>          A Prayer For Angels
>>          I prayed for Angels to guard you night and
day.
>>          I prayed they would hover and keep harm
away.
>>          If you hear the swish of wings or feel a
gentle touch.
>>          I know God heard my prayer today and loves
you very much.
>>
>>Send this to all your friends and the person who
sent it to you.
>>
>>If  you get it back- you know you have a friend for
life!!!
>>
>>--------- End forwarded message ----------
>>
>
>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints!
http://photos.yahoo.com


Don,

I have had a chance to look over the MDEA folder and saw that all the sheets I am responsible for are all there with the exception of the MDEA faxed sheets. Now I know these are my sheets because due to a glitch in the page setup the OATI checkouts print the last hour off the page and it is not seen on the sheet I fax across to Entergy Trans. Since my fax transmission pages are also present I fail to see how only the MDEA fax sheets can disappear since I hold them together by means of a u-clip which was in the folder too. I  was told today that such means of securing the papers might not be the best and that I should staple them instead.

As for the Load sheet matrix, I have been doing that consistently and never has a problem presented itself before this. I can only conclude that it was a software glitch. However I wanted to ensure that I wasnt doing anything wrong in terms of procedure. I am sorry this brought about so much inconvenience but I can assure you it is not due to a lack in my efforts.

For the former printing problem I have spoken with the IT Resolution centre and hopefully they'll have an answer for me soon. As for the latter I shall simply take a printout of the same henceforth. Please feel free to let me know if I need to do something more.

Regards,

Punit.


Here's the article that I referred to.  Could you please email or fax to me
the Commission's decision denying Edison's emergency motion?  Greatly
appreciated.

Best,
Al Gore
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/06/2000 03:25 PM -----

	Miyung Buster@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	10/05/2000 02:24 PM

		 To: Joe Hartsoe@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin@EES, Susan Mara@EES, Paul
Kaufman@ECT, Karen Denne@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich@EES, Mark Palmer@ENRON, James D
Steffes@EES, Richard Shapiro@EES, Elizabeth Linnell@EES, Jeannie
Mandelker@ECT, filuntz@aol.com, Mark Schroeder@ECT, Peter Styles@ECT,
Liz@luntz.com, Mona L Petrochko@EES, Peggy Mahoney@EES, Nicholas
O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Mike Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob
Bradley@ENRON, Shelley Corman@ENRON, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Edison International CFO Disputes 'Technical Insolvency' Claim

Edison International CFO Disputes 'Technical Insolvency' Claim
By Mark Golden

10/03/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Edison International's treasurer and chief financial
officer, Ted Craver, disputed Tuesday a claim made last week that
California's utilities risk "technical insolvency" in 2001.
Since May, California's three investor-owned utilities have been spending far
more to purchase needed electricity than they are getting paid by customers.
As a result, the undercollections in the "transition revenue account" of
Edison's regulated utility unit, Southern California Edison, grew by $1.97
billion between May 1 and August 31, the company reported to the Securities
Exchange Commission.
An article Wednesday in the Wall Street Journal, which is published by Dow
Jones & Co., said that "if the cost of wholesale power continues to exceed
the price these utilities are allowed to bill their customers, as currently
seems likely, they could become technically insolvent sometime next year."
"The way this term was used insinuated that you take the transition revenue
account, and whatever the gross number is equates to the amount of debt that
you would have to raise," Craver said in an interview. "That is not at all
the way it works. That is not an accurate portrayal."
California Gov. Gray Davis acknowledged the concerns Friday, saying,
"California consumers have a legitimate need for California's utilities to
remain solvent, and the state must be committed toward that end."
But Edison's Craver said the situation is not that simple.
"That transition revenue account balance says nothing about what we have to
fund in the market," Craver said. "Southern California Edison has some 37
balancing and memo accounts set up by the California Public Utilities
Commission. What we have to fund is the net amount of all of them, plus
whatever else is going on, and the net figure is considerably smaller than
the $1.97 billion. It's like picking out one line item on the balance sheet
and saying this is all that matters. No accountant does that or looks at it
that way."
Craver also said that the term "technical insolvency" has no specific meaning
to him.
A PG&E Corp (PCG) spokesman declined to comment when asked this week if it
risks technical insolvency next year. The company is seeking refunds from
independent generators that have been selling power to the state's utilities,
and for the future it has asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to
consider a return to cost-based pricing specific to each generating station
in the state.
Utility bond analysts, nevertheless, are concerned about California utility
debt.
"I don't believe the utilities are going to go bankrupt, but they don't have
any assurance from the legislature, governor or regulators," Bear Stearns's
Ted Olshanski said. "The uncertainty is critical."
Bear Stearns has a negative outlook on Edison and PG&E bonds due to the
uncertainty on the recovery of these energy costs.
This summer's period of undercollections has continued into the fall, with
the California's wholesale market for Wednesday power at $135 a
megawatt-hour, compared with the $65/MWh that SCE gets from customers.
The current best asking price for on-peak power fall all of 2001 in southern
California is $85/MWh.
When asked how long Edison can continue to fund the difference between its
purchase power costs and the revenue it receives from customers, Craver
responded: "How long can ratepayers or anyone afford those prices, which
don't have anything to do with reality? The market mechanisms don't work."
California's utilities are hoping to make significant changes to the market,
and some of those changes would require action by the state legislature,
which is out of session until December.
"I don't know that this is something that waits for the legislature," Craver
said. "There are a lot of things that can be done before the legislature
meets. We have significant issues before the FERC and the CPUC."
Olshanski said he hoped for a political solution.
"We're not sure how its going to end," he said. "We expect regulators and
legislators to step up and provide for a constructive resolution. In the
past, the California legislature has approved measures to make companies
whole."
-By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com


that is what i was thinking.


Please find attached the average of NYMEX L3D Closes for PJM and Cinergy.  Please call me at x58528 if you have any further questions.

Thank You,
Castlen Moore


did we get the 5/d rox at plus .02 yesterday?

mike


Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042224.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 24 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TRADING_SC: ECH1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred:  70.85 / Final:  70.82)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Received a call this afternoon from Gordon Smith, CEO of PG&E (I met Gordon
when he was CFO of PG&E and I was a bureaucrat at the PUC working on the Blue
Book).  He was following up from the meeting this morning with Bob Glynn.  He
was very positive about the comprehensive solution that Ken Lay described to
Glynn at this morning's meeting.  He was particularly positive about the
core/noncore proposal.  He asked to meet to discuss it further.  I have an
appointment to meet with him Monday afternoon.  He offered--as a board member
of the California Chamber of Commerce--to help bring the Chamber along, and
he also said that he can help with the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Ass.
I'll report back after the meeting.

And may have already mentioned that I have a meeting scheduled in Sacramento
Monday with the CEO of the Chamber and the President of CMA.

Will report back on the meetings.  Have a good weekend.

Best,
Jeff


I should be in the office after 1100 on Friday.  Are you available?

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           09/12/2000 07:15 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: ESA equipment purchase

My revisions. Let's discuss at your earliest convenience.

Ben

	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           09/08/2000 01:48 PM

To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ESA equipment purchase

Ben,

Here's a draft of an MOU for the sale of the LMs and ABB equipment to ESA.
One issue is when this transaction can close.  Since the equipment is owned
by WestLB and since the feeling is we don't want to involve WestLB in the
transaction, the actual transfer would take place at the termination of the
WestLB facility.  If another approach is preferred, we will need to circle
back with Lisa.

A second issue I see is with the concept that GE will need to look to both
ENA (or WestLB's successor) for some of the payments, but look to ESA for
payment for changes, storage, etc.  As far as I know, this concept hasn't
been addressed with GE.

I re-calculated the overhead charge, so you might want to check it out.

I look forward to your comments.

Kay


shes pretty sexy, huh?  are we getting together to talk europe tonoght?

"Brian Hoskins" <Brian_Hoskins@enron.com> on 01/25/2000 10:18:49 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Evite: Super Bowl Party

Eric, you have way too much time on your hands.

Damn boy, are you gonna bust a move on the secretary?

"Eric Bass" <ebass@ect.enron.com> on 01/25/2000 02:11:01 AM

To:   Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Evite: Super Bowl Party

Hi!

I'd like to invite you to: Super Bowl Party

Just click on the link below, and it will take you to my personal Evite
event page to see everyone's comments, RSVP, and get all the details.

http://www.evite.com/respond?iid=AIKFBNAYGEFDHRZFVUSW

I hope you can make it, and I look forward to seeing your reply on the event
page!

Cheers!

Eric Bass

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
HAVING TROUBLE?

If nothing happens when you click the link above, use your mouse to cut
and paste the entire address into your Web browser, then hit return.
Make sure you copy it exactly as it appears above. That will take you to
the invite. (Note: Some AOL users may need to access their invite through
the Evite homepage. See instructions below.)

If you can't access the invite page:

1. Go to http://www.evite.com/
2. Log in (if you are already a member) or sign up for an Evite account,
using the same email address the organizer used to contact you about this
event.
3. Go to your "My Invites" inbox and click the event title to view your
invite!

----------------------------------------------
Brought to you by Evite
Check out http://www.evite.com/ today.
Getting your friends together just got easier.

 - att1.htm


Hi, the attorney for AEP is Mitch Dutton.  His phone number is (614) 324-4568.

Thanks!
Melissa


I did not think the One-Train Contract had been signed.  If it has, we
should include it.  As I do not have a copy of either contract, I do not
know the answer to your question on GE's ability to ask for assurances
of performance.  I should be getting a copy today of the Two-Train
Contract and I will check.  I inserted the provision regarding Agent's
giving notice to GE of DevCo's default at Rose's request.

Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: Sheila.Tweed@enron.com [mailto:Sheila.Tweed@enron.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2000 10:41 AM
To: Taylor, Rob
Cc: Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com; Kay.Mann@enron.com;
Lisa.Bills@enron.com; Ben.Jacoby@enron.com; hwendell@mdbe.com
Subject: Re: GE Consent to Assignment

Rob, why isn't the Pastoria One-Train contract included (it has now been
signed I believe)?  If Agent were to give GE notice of Devco's default,
does GE have a rememdy under the turbine contracts to ask for collateral
or
accelerate the payment schedule?  I know that GE did not mention this in
our call.  What will Devco be able to do, just in case GE asks about
this?
Otherwise the draft l;ooks good and we await GE's comments.  The guay at
GE
to send this to by the way is Paul Miller@ps.ge.com.  Thanks!


Will you be in Friday?  If so, could you help me remember to pick up my
parking card.  I FINALLY got a slot at the Met.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/16/2000 11:11
AM ---------------------------

Parking & Transportation
08/16/2000 10:27 AM
Sent by: DeShonda Hamilton
To: Todd Thelen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Will Zamer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Debora
Dancy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sam
Habash/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Derryl Cleaveland/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Gilda Bartz/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Marsha Francis/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert
Shiring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eduardo Robles/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Louis Allen/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Parking Availability

We now have parking spaces available at the Metropolitan Garage, which is
right next to the Allen Center garage, for $69.00 per month, payroll
deduction. If you are interested, please reply via e-mail by 5:00 p.m.,
Thursday, August 17.

Your access card will be ready for pick-up on Friday, August 18.

If you are currently parking in a garage subsidized by Enron, you will need
to turn in that access card before you get a Metropolitan access card. You
will be able to get out of your current garage.

DeShonda
x3-6399


Reminder, John will be flying to the  Portland Office. and Milly in in Toronto

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Cliff Lawrick                           01/18/2000 03:01 PM

To: Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dan Dietrich/CAL/ECT@ECT, Ian
Dundas/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jai Hawker/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kevin Heal/CAL/ECT@ECT, Robert
Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT,
John J Lavorato/CAL/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Doug
Paterson/CAL/ECT@ECT, Barry Tycholiz/CAL/ECT@ECT, Chad Clark/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Scott Adams/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard Gebauer/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jason
Biever/CAL/ECT@ECT, Grant Oh/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Thursday, Jan. 20 7:00 PM Saddledome

Next ice time is this Thursday.  Usual drill.  I'll send the e-mail.  Nobody
replies.  I'll walk around and ask who's playing and who can bring a goalie
and their only friend!


We have two additional NDA's in addition to the Live Capital one.  Any conflicts?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perinne, Albane
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:45 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	Re: Vendor Information

Tana-
Please note the following information:
 LiveCapital:
1900 South Norfolk Street, #115
San Mateo, CA 94403-1151
Contact: Andrew Roth
Phone: 650-350-3514
eCredit:
20 CareMatrix Drive
Dedham, MA 02026
Contact: John Geraci
Phone: 847-466-1196

eFinance:
1085 East Meadow Circle
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Contact: David Cain
Phone: 415-354-6237

Please let me know if you need any other information.  I appreciate your time and attention.
Albane E. Perinne
Enron Credit
713-345-3520 phone
713-345-4993 fax
www.enroncredit.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 01/06/2000 10:29 AM
---------------------------
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: follow thi link

http://www.altavista.com/cgi-bin/query?pg=q&sc=on&q=register+domain&kl=XX&styp
e=stext


Nuclear 7-Day Forecast for our valued Customer

Greetings,

Please find the attached 7-Day forecast Nuclear status report. If you have any questions please email to outages@industrialinfo.com
 - NucPDF.pdf


Howard, Kathleen, & Steve --

Can we sit down and discuss our strategies going forward in light of this RD?  I'd like to understand where there are opportunities (both for POLR outsourcing and standard market entry).  I don't think that there will ever be a huge surplus in generation (and there shouldn't be in a competitive market).  Instead of focusing on something the NYPSC can't control, why not work on demand responsiveness?  Better metering technology would certainly help.

Let me know when a good time would be?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sullivan, Kathleen
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 11:00 AM
To:	Novosel, Sarah; Allegretti, Daniel; Fromer, Howard; Steffes, James D.; Montovano, Steve
Subject:	Highlights of the Recommended Decision in NY's Energy Competition Case

Sarah,
I've attached an article from today's Megawatt Daily regarding NY's generic energy competition case.  I've also attached a summary of the RD written by Kevin Brocks, our NESPA Counsel.  As you can see, the RD dismisses aggressive migration measures until wholesale markets are functioning better.  Furthermore, the RD states that until supplies increase and markets stabilize, ratepayers must be protected.  In addition, a PSC official is quoted as saying that it "will be another three to four years until there is sufficient supply in the state to allow for workably competitive markets, and that it could be at least 10 years before retail competition is viable."

Is there anything in the RTO Order or your participation thus far in the mediation process that could refute the claim that it will be 3 or 4 years until there is sufficient supply in NY to allow for workably competitive markets?
-Kathleen

 << File: nespa rd highlights 7-19-01.doc >>

MegawattDaily
New York PSC draft report sees competition in 3-4 years

New York regulatory staff expects
comments tomorrow on a recom-mended
decision about the future of
competitive power market development
in the state.
The recommended decision, issued
last month by two administrative law
judges for the state Public Service Com-mission
and a PSC official (00-M-0504),
says it will be another three to
four years until there is sufficient supply
in the state to allow for workably com-petitive
markets, and that it could be at
least 10 years before retail competition
is viable.
Two principal problems in transi-tioning
to a competitive market are
inelastic supply and demand, both of
which are inherent in energy markets, the
proposed decision, issued last month,
says. Until supply consistently exceeds
demand by a certain margin, the PSC
must play a prominent role in the state's
power markets.
"Markets characterized by largely
inelastic supply and demand where
demand is approaching or is equal to
supply are not workably competitive and
will not produce just and reasonable
rates," the recommended decision says.
"Until supplies increase, ratepayers
should be provided some measure of
protection from those markets. Once
supply exceeds demand sufficiently to
eliminate the exercise of excessive mar-ket
power, the markets can become
workably competitive and will likely
produce just and reasonable rates."
The recommended decision goes on
to warn, "Unrealistic expectations con-cerning
the timing of market develop-ment
(either too long or too short) can
have serious consequences to the public,
and can, in the extreme, result in the
worst of all possible outcomes - the
creation of an unregulated monopoly.
"If competition is assumed to
develop very rapidly and wholesale
market prices are imposed on customers
without regulatory intervention and
from a market that is not workably com-petitive,
higher prices and rates that do
not meet the statutory standard of just
and reasonable are likely. On the other
hand, if a long transition is assumed and
significant regulatory control continues
to be exercised over prices, competition
and its benefits could be stifled indefi-nitely."
In March 2000, the PSC initiated
the proceeding to examine the state's
progress toward competitive markets. It
sought information on the difficulties
that have emerged, lessons learned and
directions for where to go next.
The recommended decision says
that in a competitive market, utilities
should play no role in providing electric
or gas service. But before the PSC
removes a utility from the market, cer-tain
preconditions must be met, "includ-ing
a determination that the wholesale
and retail markets are operating without
the exercise of market power. As a gen-eral
matter, the utilities should not be
removed from any market until multiple
suppliers offering a variety of products
are available for the entire customer
class throughout the utility's service ter-ritory."
The PSC also should wait for state
lawmakers or the courts to confirm its
authority to take such action.
The recommended decision also
says that "robust, fully competitive retail
markets will develop at different times
for different customer classes."
The PSC should encourage invest-ment
in transmission and distribution
infrastructure for both electricity and gas
"including, if necessary, ordering the
franchised utilities to construct any need-ed
facilities," the recommended decision
says.
Although the PSC should restate its
support for retail competition and pro-ceed
"with deliberate speed in fostering
market development," the agency should
maintain "just and reasonable rates"
throughout the period of transition to
competition.
"We are confident that a flexible
oversight process that encourages com-petition
and allows it to develop wherev-er
the economics can support it will pro-tect
consumers during the transition, per-mit
markets to develop freely, and will
serve the public interest," the recom-mended
decision says.
Exceptions to the proposed decision
are due tomorrow and responses are due
Aug. 28.
The judges and the PSC official plan
to present a final recommended decision
to the commission this fall. JCS


Brent;

I discussed with local outside counsel some additional issues regarding the
implementation of EOL in Brazil.  Please review the attached memo carefully
(I think it is self-explanantory) and let me know if you need any further
clarification.

Best regards,

Sami

 - consumer.doc


Neil left town yesterday.  I can't really complain since he rarely travels.
However, he is welcome to pamper upon his return!

Kay

From: Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/27/2000 02:21 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: EB Top 10 List Winners!

I understand that you and Michael are sick with strep throat.  I hope you get
well over the weekend and that Neill appropriately pampers you and Michael in
the interim.


Just a reminder:  If you are interested in the position, have any questions about it, or would just like more information, please stop by :

INFORMATION SESSION:
West Hourly Enron Online Position (Real Time Trading Group)
Wednesday, July 25th - 4:00pm, Mt. Hood Conference Room

See below for position description.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 1:32 PM
To:	DL-Portland World Trade Center
Subject:	Available Opportunity - July 20, 2001 (West Hourly Enron Online)

A position has recently become available in the Real Time Trading group reporting to Bill Williams.  Bill will be holding an information session on Wednesday, July 25, 2001 at 4:00 pm in Mt Hood for anyone who is interested in learning more about this opportunity.

If you would like to be considered for this role, please let Amy FitzPatrick know by close of business on Friday, July 27, 2001.

West Hourly Enron Online Trader

The Short Term West Hourly group is responsible for the physical and financial integrity of prescheduled energy transactions. This includes managing curtailed schedules and preserving Enron's financial rights with trading counterparties. The group is required to maintain records and update databases that explain supply or market interruptions in order to minimize customer disputes

The Hourly group interacts with the Services and Middle Marketing groups to administer terms of Service Desk contracts, which may include the selling of excess generation and/or the purchasing of energy to meet customers' requirements.  Also, each trader is responsible for gathering and reporting information on unit outages, transmission line derations and other information pertaining to all West Desk Trading activity.

The West Hourly EOL Trader will be responsible for helping to lead the transition of hourly trading of energy in the California ISO and bilateral markets to Enron Online.  The trader is expected to initiate profitable trades while managing the company's risk exposure.  The trader is expected to understand all settlements procedures and be familiar with charges related to each type of trade.  The trader will proactively work to bring new hourly customers to Enron Online and will respond to internal and external billing inquiries.  This position is anticipated to last 3-6 months, with the trader moving to a shift rotation at that time.

Description of Function
?	Trade hourly physical and/or financial products on Enron Online
?	Work closely with Services Trader to integrate service and middle marketing customer positions
?	Physically schedule trades including tagging where appropriate
?	Enter trades and reconcile company accounting system where appropriate
?	Assist in the resolution of volume/price discrepancies
?	Work closely with Information Technology and Fundamentals groups to maintain and develop Real-Time tools and systems

Requirements
?	Bachelors in Finance, Business, Accounting or related field
?	1 to 2 years of previous power trading or industry experience in WSCC is preferred
?	Excellent problem solving and communication skills
?	Working knowledge of Excel, Access, Visual Basic and SQL
?	Self motivated
Detail oriented


Ian -

Attached for Natsource's signing are the final versions of the BETA and Fee
Agreement.  One you have confirmed these are acceptable, please have an
authorized rep. sign two originals of each document, have a copy of  each
agreement faxed to my attention or to Tana Jones (for countersignature by
Enron) and have both sets of originals forwarded to me or Tana Jones for
countersignature by Enron.

I will ensure that one set of originals are returned to your attention.

Also, please be sure to forward the revised letter of credit reflecting that
it stands for both Natsource and Natsource Tullett Europe as we cannot issue
a password or allow access until this agreement is received.  Further, please
ensure that payment of the fee is made.  If wiring instructions are needed, I
will be happy to obtain them for you and forward for your use.

Thanks.  Please let me know if there is anything further that you should need.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Tana:

Commercial Risk Re-Insurance Company is NOT authorized to trade US power --
not a current CP/not FERC approved.

***********************

City of New Smyrna Fl. is authorized to trade only pursuant to on-line GTCs
-- will receive override.

Leslie


Wednesday afternoon Febuary 6th, 2002, the Enron building experienced a brief power outage.  The building is powered by one of two Reliant circuits.  Yesterday, while a backup circuit was turned off for nearby construction of the light rail system, the primary circuit failed.  Typically, the backup system would have switch on immediately, but because the backup circuit was off the building's backup generators were activated creating what was perceived by some as smoke.  While there was no fire within the building, many employees quickly evacuated the building through the stairwell.  Given heighten concerns for national security, evacuation was indeed appropriate and we appreciate that employees conducted the evacuation calmly and courteously.

Enron Property & Services Corp


********PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE************

********************************************************************
    AIR CANADA'S EXTENDED WEBSAVER(TM)CONTINUES THROUGH JANUARY
********************************************************************

It's time to stretch your weekends! Extended Websaver continues
through January. You can enjoy our low Websaver fares for longer
stays. Depart as early as Thursday and stay as late as the following
Wednesday. That's up to 7 days! And now you can enjoy Websaver fares
for about twice as many destinations!

Air Canada's WEBSAVER* specials are only valid for travel originating
in Canada and/or the United States. To enjoy WEBSAVER specials,
flights must be booked online or with your Travel Agent. For
Air Canada WEBSAVER* bookings, you can now go on-line at:

https://w4.aircanada.ca/aeroplan/mileageE.html

Also, to stay informed of any changes to your flight status, register
a request for a flight notification at:

http://www.aircanada.ca/services/mobile/notification.html
and automatically receive alerts through your text enabled
phone/pager or email address.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Air Canada Vacations offers great package deals to its newest
destination, Cuba. Please click on the following link to view our
latest specials:

http://www.aircanadavacations.com/ACV/start.htm

---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

 http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/direct.html

*****************TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR SPECIAL OFFERS****************
_____________________________________________________________________

Fare basis code:    LWEBSAVE
Sale Period :       December 26, 2001 to December 29, 2001
Travel Period :     Outbound: permitted December 27, 2001 through
                    December 29, 2001 inclusive
                    Inbound: permitted December 31, 2001 through
                    January 2, 2002 inclusive

- From/Within CANADA in (CAN $)     BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Ottawa          - New York (EWR)   183.00  151.92   334.92  DL-55JLWQ
Toronto         - New York (EWR)   183.00  151.92   334.92  DL-55JLWR

_____________________________________________________________________

*****************TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR SPECIAL OFFERS****************
_____________________________________________________________________

Fare basis code:    LWEBSAVE
Sale Period :       December 26, 2001 to December 29, 2001
Travel Period :     Outbound: permitted December 27, 2001 through
                    December 29, 2001 inclusive
                    Inbound: permitted December 31, 2001 through
                    January 2, 2002 inclusive

- From/Within CANADA in (CAN $)     BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Calgary         - Houston IAH      287.00  156.64   443.64  DL-55JLWW

_____________________________________________________________________

**********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS***************
_____________________________________________________________________

Fare basis code:    LWEBSAVE
Sale Period :       December 26, 2001 to December 29, 2001
Travel Period :     Outbound: permitted December 29, 2001 through
                    December 29, 2001 inclusive
                    Inbound: permitted January 10, 2002 through
                    January 11, 2002 inclusive
Routing :           Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only.
Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior
                             to departure.
                             Ticketing must be completed within 1 day
                             after reservations are made or at least
                             1 day prior to departure, whichever is
                             earlier.
Maximum Stay :      All travel must be complete by January 11, 2002
Combinations :      Not Permitted
Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking :   Not Permitted
Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable
Infant Discount :   90%, provided infant not occupying a seat.
Cancellations :     Non - Refundable

*International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada

- From/Within CANADA in (CAN $)     BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Toronto         - Puerto Vallarta  589.00  112.30   701.30  DL-55JMBV

_____________________________________________________________________

**********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS***************
_____________________________________________________________________

Fare basis code:    LWEBSAVE
Sale Period :       December 26, 2001 to December 29, 2001
Travel Period :     Outbound: permitted December 30, 2001 through
                    December 31, 2001 inclusive
                    Inbound: permitted January 8, 2002 through
                    January 10, 2002 inclusive
Routing :           Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only.
Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior
                             to departure.
                             Ticketing must be completed within 1 day
                             after reservations are made or at least
                             1 day prior to departure, whichever is
                             earlier.
Maximum Stay :      All travel must be complete by January 10, 2002
Combinations :      Not Permitted
Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking :   Not Permitted
Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable
Infant Discount :   90%, provided infant not occupying a seat.
Cancellations :     Non - Refundable

*International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada

- From/Within CANADA in (CAN $)     BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Toronto         - Cancun           549.00  109.20   658.20  DL-55JMBM

_____________________________________________________________________

**********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS***************
_____________________________________________________________________

Fare basis code:    LWEBSAVE
Sale Period :       December 26, 2001 to December 29, 2001
Travel Period :     Outbound: permitted December 30, 2001 through
                    December 31, 2001 inclusive
                    Inbound: permitted January 15, 2002 through
                    January 17, 2002 inclusive
Routing :           Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only.
Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior
                             to departure.
                             Ticketing must be completed within 1 day
                             after reservations are made or at least
                             1 day prior to departure, whichever is
                             earlier.
Maximum Stay :      All travel must be complete by January 17, 2002
Combinations :      Not Permitted
Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking :   Not Permitted
Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable
Infant Discount :   90%, provided infant not occupying a seat.
Cancellations :     Non - Refundable

*International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada

- From/Within CANADA in (CAN $)     BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Toronto         - Barbados         699.00   16.70   715.70  DL-55JLXM

_____________________________________________________________________

**********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS***************
_____________________________________________________________________

Fare basis code:    LWEBSAVE
Sale Period :       December 26, 2001 to December 29, 2001
Travel Period :     Outbound: permitted January 12, 2002 through
                    January 12, 2002 inclusive
                    Inbound: permitted January 15, 2002 through
                    January 15, 2002 inclusive
Routing :           Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only.
Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior
                             to departure.
                             Ticketing must be completed within 1 day
                             after reservations are made or at least
                             1 day prior to departure, whichever is
                             earlier.
Maximum Stay :      All travel must be complete by January 15, 2002
Combinations :      Not Permitted
Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking :   Not Permitted
Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable
Infant Discount :   90%, provided infant not occupying a seat.
Cancellations :     Non - Refundable

*International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada

- From/Within CANADA in (CAN $)     BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Vancouver       - Cancun           509.00   98.50   607.50  DL-55JMC4

_____________________________________________________________________

**********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS***************
_____________________________________________________________________

Fare basis code:    LWEBSAVE
Sale Period :       December 26, 2001 to December 29, 2001
Travel Period :     Outbound: permitted January 13, 2002 through
                    January 13, 2002 inclusive
                    Inbound: permitted January 18, 2002 through
                    January 18, 2002 inclusive
Routing :           Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only.
Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior
                             to departure.
                             Ticketing must be completed within 1 day
                             after reservations are made or at least
                             1 day prior to departure, whichever is
                             earlier.
Maximum Stay :      All travel must be complete by January 18, 2002
Combinations :      Not Permitted
Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking :   Not Permitted
Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable
Infant Discount :   90%, provided infant not occupying a seat.
Cancellations :     Non - Refundable

*International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada

- From/Within CANADA in (CAN $)     BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Vancouver       - Puerto Vallarta  459.00  101.60   560.60  DL-55JMCB

_____________________________________________________________________

**********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS***************
_____________________________________________________________________

Fare basis code:    LWEBSAVE
Sale Period :       December 26, 2001 to December 29, 2001
Travel Period :     Outbound: permitted January 5, 2002 through
                    January 6, 2002 inclusive
                    Inbound: permitted January 12, 2002 through
                    January 13, 2002 inclusive
Routing :           Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only.
Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior
                             to departure.
                             Ticketing must be completed within 1 day
                             after reservations are made or at least
                             1 day prior to departure, whichever is
                             earlier.
Maximum Stay :      All travel must be complete by January 13, 2002
Combinations :      Not Permitted
Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking :   Not Permitted
Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable
Infant Discount :   90%, provided infant not occupying a seat.
Cancellations :     Non - Refundable

*International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada

- From/Within CANADA in (CAN $)     BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Toronto         - Nassau           369.00   16.70   385.70  DL-55JLXT

_____________________________________________________________________

**********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS***************
_____________________________________________________________________

Fare basis code:    LWEBSAVE
Sale Period :       December 26, 2001 to December 29, 2001
Travel Period :     Outbound: permitted January 5, 2002 through
                    January 6, 2002 inclusive
                    Inbound: permitted January 17, 2002 through
                    January 18, 2002 inclusive
Routing :           Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only.
Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior
                             to departure.
                             Ticketing must be completed within 1 day
                             after reservations are made or at least
                             1 day prior to departure, whichever is
                             earlier.
Maximum Stay :      All travel must be complete by January 18, 2002
Combinations :      Not Permitted
Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking :   Not Permitted
Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable
Infant Discount :   90%, provided infant not occupying a seat.
Cancellations :     Non - Refundable

*International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada

- From/Within CANADA in (CAN $)     BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Toronto         - Montego Bay      469.00   60.00   529.00  DL-55JLXB

_____________________________________________________________________

**********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS***************
_____________________________________________________________________

Fare basis code:    LWEBSAVE
Sale Period :       December 26, 2001 to December 29, 2001
Travel Period :     Outbound: permitted January 6, 2002 through
                    January 6, 2002 inclusive
                    Inbound: permitted January 13, 2002 through
                    January 13, 2002 inclusive
Routing :           Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only.
Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior
                             to departure.
                             Ticketing must be completed within 1 day
                             after reservations are made or at least
                             1 day prior to departure, whichever is
                             earlier.
Maximum Stay :      All travel must be complete by January 13, 2002
Combinations :      Not Permitted
Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking :   Not Permitted
Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable
Infant Discount :   90%, provided infant not occupying a seat.
Cancellations :     Non - Refundable

*International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada

- From/Within CANADA in (CAN $)     BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Toronto         - Saint Lucia      599.00   16.70   615.70  DL-55JLX5

_____________________________________________________________________

*****************TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR WEEKEND FARES*****************
************************HOTELS & CAR RENTALS*************************
_____________________________________________________________________

Air Canada's WEBSAVER* and Partners offer great discounts for
last minute travel to selected destinations each week. The fares
listed are valid for new reservations only and for travel this
weekend only; you must depart on Thursday December 27, 2001, Friday
December 28, 2001 or on Saturday December 29, 2001 returning
anytime the following Monday December 31, 2001, Tuesday
January 01 ,2002 or Wednesday January 02, 2002.

Please note that not all flights are available for Friday
departures.

For Air Canada WEBSAVER* bookings, you can now book on-line at:

https://w4.aircanada.ca/aeroplan/mileageE.html or call your
Travel Agent between Wednesday and Friday.

If you are booking through your Travel Agent, please be sure to
give them the coupon number, and mention Air Canada's WEBSAVER*
fares.

For hotels and car rentals please follow the instructions listed
below with each respective offer.

*****  TRAVEL FARES ARE QUOTED AS ROUND-TRIP AND MAY ORIGINATE  *****
*********      IN EITHER CITY OF THE FOLLOWING PAIRS     ************

For GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS regarding Air Canada's WEBSAVER,
Partner Hotels and Car Rentals, please click the address below:

http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/conditions.html

- From/Within CANADA in (CAN $)     BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Bagotville      - Montreal         179.00   74.06   253.06  GP-55CJ4C
Calgary         - Regina           136.00   76.93   212.93  GP-55CHZN
Campbell River  - Vancouver         99.00   50.80   149.80  GP-55CJ23
Charlottetown   - Halifax          159.00   82.50   241.50  GP-55CJ2Z
Comox           - Vancouver        109.00   51.50   160.50  GP-55CHZW
Deer Lake       - St.John's        165.00   83.40   248.40  GP-55CJ2T
Edmonton        - Fort McMurray    189.00   67.80   256.80  GP-55CHTX
Edmonton        - Grande Prairie   179.00   67.10   246.10  GP-55CHTR
Edmonton        - Toronto          244.00   82.35   326.35  GP-55CJ4F
Fort St. John B - Vancouver        209.00   58.50   267.50  GP-55CHZK
Fredericton     - Halifax          129.00   91.80   220.80  GP-55CJ2W
Goose Bay       - St.John's        199.00   88.50   287.50  GP-55CJ2R
Halifax         - Saint John       129.00   78.00   207.00  GP-55CJ2N
Kamloops        - Vancouver         99.00   50.80   149.80  GP-55CHZ7
Kingston, ON    - Toronto           99.00   61.50   160.50  GP-55CHTC
London          - Ottawa           149.00   75.70   224.70  GP-55CHTA
London          - Toronto           68.00   70.03   138.03  GP-55CHT4
Moncton         - Montreal         179.00   74.06   253.06  GP-55CJ28
Mont-Joli       - Montreal         189.00   75.56   264.56  GP-55CJ3W
Montreal        - Saint John       179.00   74.06   253.06  GP-55CJ29
Montreal        - Val-d'Or         199.00   77.06   276.06  GP-55CJ4A
Nanaimo         - Vancouver         79.00   49.40   128.40  GP-55CHZZ
North Bay       - Toronto          109.00   62.20   171.20  GP-55CHSP
Ottawa          - Quebec City      169.00   94.75   263.75  GP-55CJ43
Prince George   - Vancouver        209.00   58.50   267.50  GP-55CHZB
Prince Rupert   - Vancouver        209.00   58.50   267.50  GP-55CHZ9
Quebec City     - Toronto          199.00   99.26   298.26  GP-55CJ4K
Regina          - Winnipeg         146.00   75.49   221.49  GP-55CHZM
Saint John      - Toronto          219.00   90.70   309.70  GP-55CJ27
Sandspit BC     - Vancouver        229.00   59.90   288.90  GP-55CHZD
Sarnia          - Toronto           79.00   60.10   139.10  GP-55CHT7
Saskatoon       - Toronto          239.00   76.65   315.65  GP-55CJ4E
Saskatoon       - Winnipeg         136.00   69.44   205.44  GP-55CHZQ
Sudbury         - Toronto          109.00   62.20   171.20  GP-55CHSS
Terrace         - Vancouver        209.00   58.50   267.50  GP-55CHZG
Thompson MB     - Winnipeg         218.00   69.83   287.83  GP-55CHSE
Thunder Bay     - Winnipeg         169.00   66.40   235.40  GP-55CJ4J
Timmins         - Toronto          189.00   78.50   267.50  GP-55CHSU
Toronto         - Windsor           99.00   61.50   160.50  GP-55CHT5
Toronto         - Winnipeg         189.00   78.50   267.50  GP-55CJ24
Vancouver       - Victoria          89.00   55.45   144.45  GP-55CHZU
Calgary         - Chicago (ORD)    277.00  162.99   439.99  GP-55CJ5A
Calgary         - Spokane WA       199.00  155.18   354.18  GP-55CJ7D
Montreal        - New York (LGA)   183.00  141.22   324.22  GP-55CJ7V
Ottawa          - Boston           193.00  152.62   345.62  GP-55CJ8J
Ottawa          - Chicago (ORD)    224.00  157.14   381.14  GP-55CJ5G
Toronto         - Albany           183.00  151.92   334.92  GP-55CJ68
Toronto         - Allentown  PA    166.00  153.08   319.08  GP-55CJ78
Toronto         - Baltimore        194.00  152.69   346.69  GP-55CJ6U
Toronto         - Columbus         183.00  151.92   334.92  GP-55CJ6M
Toronto         - Dayton           200.00  155.46   355.46  GP-55CJ6E
Toronto         - Denver           288.00  161.62   449.62  GP-55CJ9Q
Toronto         - Detroit          119.00  149.79   268.79  GP-55CJ73
Toronto         - Grande Rapids    159.00  150.24   309.24  GP-55CJ6F
Toronto         - Greensboro       209.00  149.04   358.04  GP-55CJ5M
Toronto         - Harrisburg PA    166.00  150.73   316.73  GP-55CJ75
Toronto         - Hartford         172.00  153.50   325.50  GP-55CJ6Z
Toronto         - Kansas City      262.00  157.45   419.45  GP-55CJ9B
Toronto         - Los Angeles      309.00  160.74   469.74  GP-55CJ4S
Toronto         - Louisville KY    224.00  154.79   378.79  GP-55CJ6J
Toronto         - Manchester       199.00  153.04   352.04  GP-55CJ6L
Toronto         - Milwaukee        168.00  150.87   318.87  GP-55CJ8B
Toronto         - Minneapolis      219.00  156.79   375.79  GP-55CJ8G
Toronto         - Nashville        239.00  155.84   394.84  GP-55CJ8C
Toronto         - New York (LGA)   199.00  153.04   352.04  GP-55CJ7T
Toronto         - Pittsburgh       177.00  151.50   328.50  GP-55CJ6Y
Toronto         - Providence       193.00  152.62   345.62  GP-55CJ6W
Toronto         - Raleigh-Durham   219.00  149.74   368.74  GP-55CJ5R
Toronto         - Richmond         209.00  153.74   362.74  GP-55CJ6R
Toronto         - Rochester        154.00  149.89   303.89  GP-55CJ69
Toronto         - San Diego        329.00  162.14   491.14  GP-55CJ4R
Toronto         - San Francisco    319.00  163.79   482.79  GP-55CJ4N
Toronto         - St. Louis        224.00  157.14   381.14  GP-55CJ89
Toronto         - Syracuse         183.00  151.92   334.92  GP-55CJ6B
Vancouver       - Portland OR      142.00  140.70   282.70  GP-55CJ7C
Vancouver       - Seattle          108.00  138.32   246.32  GP-55CJ79

- From USA in (USD $)               BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Albany          - Toronto          119.00   80.26   199.26  GP-55CJ67
Allentown  PA   - Toronto          108.00   80.94   188.94  GP-55CJ77
Baltimore       - Toronto          126.00   80.79   206.79  GP-55CJ6T
Boston          - Ottawa           125.00   80.71   205.71  GP-55CJ8K
Chicago (ORD)   - Calgary          180.00   87.72   267.72  GP-55CJ5P
Chicago (ORD)   - Ottawa           145.00   83.71   228.71  GP-55CJ5H
Columbus        - Toronto          119.00   80.26   199.26  GP-55CJ6N
Dayton          - Toronto          130.00   82.59   212.59  GP-55CJ6D
Denver          - Toronto          187.00   86.86   273.86  GP-55CJ9J
Detroit         - Toronto           77.00   78.61   155.61  GP-55CJ74
Grande Rapids   - Toronto          103.00   79.06   182.06  GP-55CJ6G
Greensboro      - Toronto          136.00   78.54   214.54  GP-55CJ5N
Harrisburg PA   - Toronto          108.00   79.44   187.44  GP-55CJ76
Hartford        - Toronto          112.00   81.24   193.24  GP-55CJ72
Kansas City     - Toronto          170.00   84.09   254.09  GP-55CJ9C
Los Angeles     - Toronto          201.00   86.41   287.41  GP-55CJ4Q
Louisville KY   - Toronto          145.00   82.21   227.21  GP-55CJ6H
Manchester      - Toronto          129.00   81.01   210.01  GP-55CJ6K
Milwaukee       - Toronto          109.00   79.51   188.51  GP-55CJ8N
Minneapolis     - Toronto          142.00   83.49   225.49  GP-55CJ8H
Nashville       - Toronto          155.00   82.96   237.96  GP-55CJ8D
New York (LGA)  - Montreal         119.00   73.41   192.41  GP-55CJ7W
New York (LGA)  - Toronto          129.00   81.01   210.01  GP-55CJ7S
Pittsburgh      - Toronto          115.00   79.96   194.96  GP-55CJ6X
Portland OR     - Vancouver         92.00   72.89   164.89  GP-55CJ7B
Providence      - Toronto          125.00   80.71   205.71  GP-55CJ6V
Raleigh-Durham  - Toronto          142.00   78.99   220.99  GP-55CJ59
Richmond        - Toronto          136.00   81.54   217.54  GP-55CJ6S
Rochester       - Toronto          100.00   78.84   178.84  GP-55CJ6A
San Diego       - Toronto          214.00   87.39   301.39  GP-55CJ4P
San Francisco   - Toronto          207.00   88.36   295.36  GP-55CJ4M
Seattle         - Vancouver         70.00   71.24   141.24  GP-55CJ7A
Spokane WA      - Calgary          129.00   82.39   211.39  GP-55CJ7E
St. Louis       - Toronto          145.00   83.71   228.71  GP-55CJ8A
Syracuse        - Toronto          119.00   80.26   199.26  GP-55CJ6C

---------------------------------------------------------------------
For Car & Hotel specials, click here:

http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/carhotel.html

Delta Hotels & Resorts
Hilton Hotels & Resorts, Doubletree Hotels, Embassy Suites Hotels
Marriott Hotels
Fairmont Hotels & Resorts
Westin, Sheraton, St. Regis, Four Points by Sheraton & W Hotels
Holiday Inn
Radisson Hotels
Budget Canada
Hertz
Avis
Thrifty

---------------------------------------------------------------------

________________________________________
Air Canada  -
http://www.aircanada.ca

Subscribe/Unsubscribe ...
http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/direct.html

GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS ...
http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/conditions.html


Wheat of course - blame it on all those years in Austin.

To:   IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Esanders/40us/2Eandersen/2Ecom/40ENRON@enron.com
cc:     (bcc: Jennifer D. Sanders)
Date: 08/07/2001 06:19 PM
From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
Subject:  RE: Hello!

Hmm? Blond or brunette.  Really a blond trapped in a brunette's body.  Now
my turn.

Would you rather eat white or wheat bread?

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   jennifer.d.sanders@us.andersen.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Ed+2Esanders+40us+2Eandersen+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:19 PM
   To:     Nemec, Gerald
   Subject:  RE: Hello!

   Yea, someone should have warned you about the drinks being poured at the
   ol' GK.  They tend to be pretty stiff.

   ...and ..."Swerve on?"  I have only a select group of friends who use
   such
   terminology - you must be one of those cool-guy types!

   A night out on Thursday sounds really good right now - maybe I will see
   you.  Downing Street is one of my favorite low-key spots - a bit of a
   meat
   market at times, but low key nonetheless.  Not to be rude, but to be
   thorough rather, would you describe yourself as blond or more of a
   brunette?

   Jen

   To:
   IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Esanders/40us/2Eandersen/2Ecom/40ENRON@enron.com
   cc:     (bcc: Jennifer D. Sanders)
   Date: 08/07/2001 03:09 PM
   From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
   Subject:  RE: Hello!

   Yea, we definitely had our swerve on that night.  I will have to have a
   talk with that bartender next time, because I was over-served.  Probably
   not a good idea to start at GK at 6  and stay til 2 in the morning.

   Thanks for your gracious response.  Let me tell you, I had much debate
   over
   whether email was the appropriate communication medium or the phone.  I
   was
   swung in favor of email to save myself the potential awkwardness of the
   following phone conversation scenario:

        Jennifer:  "Hello"
        Gerald:  "Hi, Jennifer, this is Gerald.  We met at the Gallant
   Knight
   on Friday"
        Jennifer:  "Who?"

   As I said Friday night was kind of hazy for me.  I'll probably be
   meeting
   some friends for happy hour on Thursday night at Downing Street.  If you
   and your friends are out, why don't you try and stop by.

   Gerald.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   jennifer.d.sanders@us.andersen.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Ed+2Esanders+40us+2Eandersen+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Tuesday, August 07, 2001 10:58 AM
      To:     Nemec, Gerald
      Subject:  Re: Hello!

      Of course I remember you.  GK is really a great spot on Fridays -
   Looked
      like you guys were having a good time!
      I found you quite nice as well, but I am currently dating someone.
   No
      worries.  While I've never been a big fan of unconventional dating
      practices (i.e. hooking up over the internet), i do fancy your
   approach
      of
      straightforward and clever ingenuity!!  And if you ever want to just
      have
      lunch or a drink anyway, let me know.

      Jen

      P.S.   Tell Mike "no worries"  as well!

      To:   Jennifer D. Sanders@ANDERSEN WO
      cc:
      Date: 08/06/2001 03:54 PM
      From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
      Subject:  Hello!

      Hi Jennifer,  I don't know if you remember, but we met at Gallant
   Knight
      on Friday night.  I was with Mike Robison and the Enron group.  I had
      never been there before, but that place is alot of fun.  Definition
   of
      "Swanky".  You are probably wondering, "Why is this guy emailing me!"
      We'll, I will be straightforward and say that I found you very
   charming.
      I wanted to see if you would be interested in meeting me for lunch or
   a
      drink afterwork!  I apologize in advance if you are dating or
   involved
      with someone, but I thought I would take that chance.

      P.S.  Mike gave me your email address, but don't hold it against him.
      ;-)

      Gerald

   **********************************************************************
      This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
   affiliate
      and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
   of
      the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
   disclosure
      by
      others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
   (or
      authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
   or
      reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
      delete
      all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
   are
      not
      intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
   evidence
      a
      binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
      affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
   not
      be
      relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
   otherwise.
      Thank you.

   **********************************************************************

      *******************Internet Email Confidentiality
      Footer*******************

      Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.
      If
      you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible
   for
      delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver
      this
      message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and
      kindly
      notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or
      your
      employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
      Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do
   not
      relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as
      neither
      given nor endorsed by it.

   *******************Internet Email Confidentiality
   Footer*******************

   Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.
   If
   you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
   delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver
   this
   message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and
   kindly
   notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or
   your
   employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
   Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
   relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as
   neither
   given nor endorsed by it.

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.


Thanks,  I love this e-mail!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	James Germain <jgermain@kaztex.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-James+20Germain+20+3Cjgermain+40kaztex+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 3:23 PM
To:	Patrice Thurston
Subject:	contracts

fedexing 2 contracts today


Here is the detail we have on Bow River Trust
---------------------- Forwarded by Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000
11:21 AM ---------------------------

"McArthur, Ian " <IAN.MCARTHUR@ROYALBANK.COM> on 09/18/2000 05:44:02 PM
To: "'cris.sherman@enron.com'" <cris.sherman@enron.com>,
"'soma.ghosh@enron.com'" <soma.ghosh@enron.com>, "'bordenr@macleoddixon.com'"
<bordenr@macleoddixon.com>, "'catherine.clark@enron.com'"
<catherine.clark@enron.com>
cc: "McArthur, Ian " <IAN.MCARTHUR@ROYALBANK.COM>, "Fleming, Blair "
<BLAIR.FLEMING@ROYALBANK.COM>
Subject: FW: Letter of Confirmation re: BF Capital Funding LP

FYI, confirmation that the wording is OK for BF Capital.? Await comments from
Enron or confirmation that you are also OK.

Thanks, Mike

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Tomlinson, Ross?
Sent:?? 2000, September, 18 5:30 PM
To:???? McArthur, Ian
Subject:??????? RE: Letter of Confirmation re: BF Capital Funding LP
Sensitivity:??? Private

Ian, wording is fine. I have confirmed that the signatories would be Bruce
Barker and David Smith (in Calgary).

Ross

-----Original Message-----
From:?? McArthur, Ian?
Sent:?? Monday, September 18, 2000 4:19 PM
To:???? 'cris.Sherman@Enron.com'
Cc:???? Tomlinson, Ross ; McArthur, Ian ; Fleming, Blair ;
'soma.ghosh@enron.com'; 'catherine.clark@enron.com';
'rick.borden@macleoddixon.com'

Subject:??????? Letter of Confirmation re: BF Capital Funding LP
Importance:???? High
Sensitivity:??? Private

Cris, as discussed, BF Equity Capital would be prepared to issue the letter
for audit purposes and we would propose the following text.? Please advise
comments asap.

Quote:

To Whom it May Concern

Re:? BF Capital Funding LP

We confirm that BF Capital Funding LP is an active investment vehicle owned
0.1% by the General Partner, IFS (Alberta) Ltd., which is in turn owned by
IFS Inc., an Ontario corporation owned by a number of legal professionals.

BF Funding LP has previously undertaken, and will continue to make, a number
of equity investments and in the proposed transaction will be purchasing 100%
of the equity interest in Bow River Trust, a trust existing under the laws of
Alberta.

For Canadian GAAP purposes, the General Partner of BF Capital Funding LP will
be required to consolidate Bow River Trust back into its accounts for
financial reporting purposes.

A 99.9% Limited Partner interest in BF Capital Funding is held by Royal Bank
of Canada under Section 468 of the Bank Act.? As Limited Partner, Royal Bank
of Canada has no control over BF Capital Funding LP and is not required to
consolidate the partnership into its accounts for financial reporting
purposes.

Yours faithfully,

Bruce Barker??? ??????? ??????? ??????? S.W. Bowen

Unquote:

Please advise comments asap. Please respond to Ian McArthur email address.

Regards
Mike Elllison
RBC Dominion Securities


Suzanne:
Could you please set up a 30 minute meeting Monday morning with Rod to
discuss Reliant Energy Services ISDA issues?
Thanks.
Carol


The report named: CE P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=4&report_name=CE+P/L&category_cd=3&category_name=CENTRAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=3&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/15/2001>, published as of 11/15/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


These ARE a kind of desk-to-desk deal, but officially they are
cross-portfolio deals, because they cross from the ENAEXEC to WEST portfolio.
I'm not familiar with Unity, but let me check around here and see if anyone
knows where these deals should be settled. Also let me know if the fact that
they are cross-portfolio deals helps you at all. That's all I know right now.

Kate

Rhonda L Denton
02/12/2001 01:22 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: ENA-Cal

Do the deals booked here need to go to Unify to be settled?  Are they desk to
desk?  Sorry to bug you but I'm assigning contract numbers.


Advisors, presented below is a memo from GPG Houston requesting that we
provide to them the number of ETS employees in each team who have taken
advantage of the one year free membership with The Nature Conservancy.
Apparently there is some concern that employees are not taking advantage of
the opportunity which has been provided for them to get involved with an
organization that has some benefit towards wildlife and habitat preservation
and enhancement.  Should an employee desire to sign up for the one year free
memebership, the Conservancy the web address is www.tnc.org.  You can click
the button that says "Become a member" and sign up for the annual membership
at that time.  At the request of Mr. John Shafer, please provide to me a
total by  team of the number of individuals which have signed up with the
Nature Conservancy by the end of the month.

Your assistance in this is greatly appreciated
---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron on 07/19/2001
03:28 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Rick Loveless                           07/19/2001 03:16 PM

To: Dan Holli/Belfield/Eott@Eott, Ron Beidelman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Leo
Nichols/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ruth Jensen/NPNG/Enron, Mike
Riedel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kyle
Purvis/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Jacob Krautsch/GCO/Enron@ENRON, David
Parham/GCO/Enron, Allan Schoen/Remote/Eott@Eott
cc:

Subject: TNC Membership

On a conference call on Wednesday concerning the ETS/TNC partnership, John
Shafer was concerned about the numbers of ETS employees signing up for the
free membership program.  John ask that I contact each of the DES's and
coordinate with them the contact of members of all ETS teams to encourage
them to take advantage of the free membership.  The thought is once the team
members receive the material concerning The Nature Conservancy (TNC) they
might as individuals or as teams be encourage to participate actively in the
programs.

Phil Lowry endorses the program and has agreed for ETS to pay the first years
membership.  It would probably be correct to contact your Regional Directors
and Advisors prior to contacting the teams.  John Shafer would like to see
100 % participation in the program.

I understand we all have busy schedules, so if you don't have time, I would
be happy to make the contact for you.  John asked that I track these numbers
for reporting to him on our next conference call (probably in September).
Could I get the team names and the number of employees that have elected to
participate.

In advance thank you for your time and effort in this matter.  Again I would
be happy to make the contacts for you.


563262
4 units to Willamette Industries Albany Paper Mill Unit
4 units to Grays Harbor Paper Unit

563259
All units to Las Vegas Cogeneration

Please let me know if this answers your question.

Thanks,
Kate

From: Amy Smith/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/29/2001 10:30 AM CST
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Unit contingent name

Kate,

In deal # 563262 Eugene Water & Electric and 563259 Salt River Project, I
need to know the Unit name in order to confirm it.

Thanks!!!
Amy


Forward to whomever you see fit. It looks like an opportunity to explain
price risk management to large customers.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/10/2001
09:21 AM ---------------------------

"Valerie Anderson" <valeriea@cbinet.com> on 05/09/2001 01:52:47 PM
To: <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Invitation to speak at September Pricing conference

Hello Mr. Kean,

In follow up to an earlier phone message I left, I am sending you the
preliminary agenda for my upcoming conference in Atlanta.  If you are not
the right person for this topic, I would appreciate suggestions for other
speakers at Enron.

Thank you!
Valerie Anderson
Conference Producer
781-939-2420

 - PricingOutline.doc


Folks,

Starting Monday, 4/22/02, manual wire requests will have to go through the Cash Management Committee (CMC) the day before payment.  This means that the request forms and accompanying support documentation will have to be signed by the appropriate signatories of the business unit (BU), the BU CAO and the BU Head and delivered to myself (3-6337) at EBN 714a or Drew Kanellopoulos (3-9424) the day before the CMC meeting.  For example, if you need a wire sent on Wednesday, 4/24/02, you would need to deliver the request to us by the end of the day on Monday, 4/22/02 so the request could be reviewed at the 4/23/02 CMC meeting.  Check requests should be delivered three days in advance.

The only exceptions to this process will be items such as same day payment for prepay commodities.

We appreciate you helping us relieve the incredible stress on the system to get payments more efficiently and please pass this on to anyone I have missed.

Regards,
Doug


As he said in the note, we can wait on the tile.  We'll contact our pal
karen, the tiling queen, and report back.  sound reasonable?

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	02/15/2001 10:14 AM

		 To: "'Cameron Sellers'" <cameron@perfect.com>, "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'"
<Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, Prentice Sellers <psellers@Haas.Berkeley.EDU>
		 cc: eldon@interx.net, Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
		 Subject: RE: FW: Roseman Creek fireplace

I gave dad a check this morning for $700 to get this underway.  What about
the tile?
-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:cameron@perfect.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 7:52 AM
To: 'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'; Prentice Sellers
Cc: eldon@interx.net; jdasovic@enron.com; Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE: FW: Roseman Creek fireplace

 Agree with PP's assessment also.  I don't always agree with PP's
assessment.

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
 -----Original Message-----
From:   Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent:   Wednesday, February 14, 2001 4:56 PM
To:     Prentice Sellers
Cc:     Cameron Sellers; eldon@interx.net; jdasovic@enron.com; Nancy Sellers
Subject:        Re: FW: Roseman Creek fireplace

Wow.  This guy sounds impressive!  I agree with Prentice's assessment (of
course, I always agree with Prentice's assessment).
Best,
Jeff
Happy Valentine's Day to all.

                    Prentice Sellers
                    <psellers@Haas.Ber        To:     <eldon@interx.net>,
Nancy Sellers
                    keley.EDU>
<Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>, Cameron
                                              Sellers <cameron@perfect.com>,
jdasovic@enron.com
                    02/14/2001 01:59          cc:
                    PM                        Subject:     Re: FW: Roseman
Creek fireplace

This guy sounds like he knows what he's talking about.  I suggest we get
the repairs done immediately and leave the tile for later.  Can you find
out if he can finish before next weekend whatever needs to be done to have
a fire safely?  I've been planning a trip with two friends of mine from
school for a long time and it would really be a bummer to have to cancel
it.  Thanks for working on this.
Also, about the $$, mom should have put aside $10,000 from grandpa ($5,000
from me and Cameron each) that was supposed to go for replacing the
roof.  This is much more important, so I suggest using that money.
Finally, we can get Jeff's friend Karen to help us with the tiles.  We will
talk to her.
At 01:43 PM 2/14/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>Dotty:  Thought you and Jack might be interested in this report.
>
>Jeff: How do we go about getting  in touch with the person you mentioned
to
>do the tiles?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:   gmc [mailto:gmc@mcn.org]
>Sent:   Wednesday, February 14, 2001 12:30 PM
>To:     eldon@interx.net
>Subject:        Roseman Creek fireplace
>
>Hello, Eldon...
>Your fireplace was improperly installed, and the fire was caused by embers
>falling in between the fireplace and the hearth, igniting the plywood
>underlayment and the wooden framing installed in front of the face and the
>header above the fireplace opening.  There should be no combustible
material
>there, and sooner or later a fire will result.  You are fortunate the
result
>was not worse.  The important metal underlayment supplied with the
fireplace
>was not installed.  The fireplace must be moved about 5" up to the face of
>the wall.  All the tile must be removed and replaced with non combustible
>underlayment.  The chimney seems ok but you must replace the cap and the
>chimney is no longer available, necessitating fireplace replacement if it
>ever becomes necessary due to corrosion.  The insulation is probably wet,
>which happens over the years and it settles, leaving hot spots in the
>chimney.  At least yours is out in the air, but it should be checked, and
>will be if I do this job.
>You will provide the tile, and bear in mind that some will have to be cut,
>so avoid small tiles.  You will also provide sanded grout and grout
>additive, and a mastic (25#) such as epoxy "Elastobon".  Your tile
supplier
>will know what we're talking about.  I will get all other materials
locally.
>You are looking at, I estimate, $2,400.00 - $3,200.00 plus materials.  I
>prefer to work jobs like this at Time and Materials, based on my labor
rate
>of $50.00 per man hour.  If I have to bid this job, it will be suitably
>inflated to deal with unforeseen variables.  I have been here for 26 years
>without any construction related problems, and have lots of references.
>The materials will consist of cedar shingles, plywood, roofing shingles
>(asphalt), glue, Wonder Board tile underlayment, stainless steel cap,
2X4's,
>screws, plumbing fittings for the gas line, sheet metal, and incidentals.
>My estimate is done as accurately as possible, but unforeseen problems
could
>change the time I've estimated for the job.  The materials will be about
>$700.00, and this is the deposit I will require.  Let me know what the ETA
>of your tile will be.  If you prefer, I can do the job without the tile,
>leaving the Wonder Board tile underlayment exposed, which is totally safe,
>and you can decide upon tile later, after looking at the site after the
>fireplace is moved.  I will need a half square min. to do the roof of the
>fireplace pop out.
>Regards,
>Will Guyan


Following please find the Weekly Management Report and the Daily Executive
Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 10/27/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,691
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,864
Total Life to Date Transactions	387,596

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 10/27/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,136	70%
Enron Europe Limited	108	33%
Global Products	179	32%
Enron Metals	268	12%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	44%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,625,572,844
MTD	39,988,467,717
LTD	208,774,711,119
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	1,976,310,704

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	14,647,038,209

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	537
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	3
Number of Products Offered Today	1,154
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,774
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,632

Also attached is the Weekly Public Domain Report, containing information
which is intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron.


I am going to invite Denis and Lynne and the Sheas to watch football on
October 22 when you guys are all hopefully there too for John Kartozian's
birthday party.

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


Are you here?  I wanted to get those Intergen consents done and out of the
way.  Also, DDuran needs to sign the Northwestern guaranty (Oz signed but
they want more copies), and I thought it would be best if you initialled.

ckm


I don't know if this meeting is still on.  I'll let you know.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000 07:36
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kimberly Brown                           11/15/2000 08:41 AM

To: Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared
Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammi
DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Craig
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean Boyle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meeting

The meeting will be Tuesday, November 21 , 3:00- 5:00, in EB 49C1

Edward Terry
11/15/2000 07:20 AM
To: Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meeting

Please check schedules and set up a meeting between East Desk Commercial and
Logistics for next Tuesday at 3:00.  Advise the Commercial Desk and myself of
place and time.

Subject: December Pre-bidweek set up w/logistics.

thank You.


Attached is an invitation to the Summer Picnic this Saturday, June 23 from
4:00-9:00 pm at the Regal Ranch.  Many of you may have already received this,
but I wanted to extend my personal invitation to you.  This is a really fun
activity, and has traditionally been one of the best opportunities to visit
with our Program participants on an informal basis.  This is a family outing
with lots of activities for the kids, and you can come and go as you please.

Please make an effort to attend on Saturday, even if you can only join us for
a little while.  Feel free to pass this invitation on to other executives in
your business unit.  The Analysts and Associates tell us that this type of
exposure to our business leaders helps drive excitement and enthusiasm within
the Program.  Your support of events like this is incredibly valuable, and
appreciated.

If you can join us, please rsvp to Jackie Coleman by email, or at extension
x54070.

Thank you,
Billy


Jeff -

As we discussed today, the following is the TRV (Trader Report Viewer)
project status:

?  TRV is targeted to be implemented by May 15th as scheduled.
?  TRV development and security setup has been completed and is ready to be
presented to the traders.
?  Hal and I will meet with Phillip and Kam tomorrow to provide the TRV
system and administrator rights review, and to publish  their region's
reports.
?  We will then meet with Darron, David, and Errol (to be scheduled for early
next week) to provide the TRV system and  administrator rights review, and to
publish their region's reports.
?   At the conclusion of the review, we will determine we will roll out the
training for the remaining team members within each  region (i.e. Region
Leads or IT to provide training to the team members).
?  Currently TRV is running in the development environment for the review
period.  Upon conclusion of the review period, we will  ask for approval and
UAT signoff from you in order to transition the system into the Production
environment.

Again, thank you and each of your team members for everyone's help and
support on this initiative!  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Shirley McDowell
TRV Project / IT Project Manager


In order for me to effectively represent you at the ETS PRC  and for some of
you at the Accounting and Finance PRC's I will need some information from
each of you.      Please send the following to Kathy Campos who will put it
together for me in a book.

1. Copy of your goals for 2000 and the latest status.
2. A list of accomplishments/things you are proud of this year, specifically
indicate any involvement in the    Associates/Analysts Program or the
Recruiting Program.
3. Copy of a Self Evaluation you completed in the PEP System.
4. Your Supervisor will provide me with a Copy of a Preliminary Evaluation.

I will need these by the 29th of November for those in the accounting and
finance ranks.   For all others I will need the input for the 13th of
December.