Senator Burton spoke with the Speaker  Wednesday  night and urged him not to convene an Assembly session during the scheduled recess, since the Senate is not going to interrupt their vacation. Burton's request, in conjunction with the Speaker's trouble in getting enough of his members to return on their own dime (he didn't want the Assembly to pay for people to fly back from European vacations for 48 hours - and few members were willing to pay for it themselves), means there will probably not be a hearing on Hertzberg's Edison bailout plan tomorrow.
Since Hertzberg plan is different from the bill the Senate passed, Burton wants Hertzberg to include the Senate in discussions on a solution that can get passed in both houses. Since  there is not expected to be any hearing on any bills/Edison bailout before both houses return from the summer recess on August 20th - we look  for negotiations to occur on extending the MOU's Aug 15th deadline.

 State of the Negotiations-- Issues to Be Covered

Below are the current provisions Keeley and Hertzberg are wanting to pass into legislation (when they return from recess).  Currently, they are not sure if all of these amendments would be wrapped up into one bill or if they would just amend bill SB78XX while introducing a new bill SB_XX.  Working under the assumption that they would amend bill 78XX and introduce a new one, the following issues are a reflection of their current positions.  If they decide to introduce one new bill than the issues below would be included into one piece of legislation.  Please remember, these issues are only their current thoughts and are such to change.  There are important differences in the proposals with significant implications for a SoCal voluntary filing--these include whether to include a bond bailout; conservation easement; a rate-payer benefit account; neither bill offers a transmission line purchase or any kind of trust to assist SoCal.

SoCal Debt
SB _XX
No provision for debt.
SB 78XX (amended)
Approximately $2.9B through corporate bond financing supported by a Dedicated Rate Component (DRC) over a period of time sufficient to pay the bonds (10-15 years).  Final debt amount to be established by the PUC and the State Auditor.

Core vs. Non-Core
SB _XX
For purposes of paying the SoCal debt, creates a Core program for consumers with a peak demand of less than ?Kw and Non-Core customers of ?Kw or more.  They would share in the cost of SoCal debt retirement: (1) all consumers share pro rata for the first two years, (2) Non-Core pay 100% after two years.
SB 78XX(amended)
No Provisions.

Transmission System Purchase
SB _XX and SB 78XX
No purchase of transmission assets.

Conservation Easements
SB _XX
No conservation easements.
SB 78XX(amended)
Specific conservation easements and other land arrangements described in bill for about 24,000 acres per the Governor's MOU.

Direct Access
SB _XX
Removes regulatory constraints on a Direct Access program effective January 1, 2002 and permits customers to buy power if there is a net short after SoCal native generation, bilateral contracts, and DWR contracts.  Residential and small commercial customers may use direct access from renewable energy sources.
SB 78XX(amended)
No provisions for Direct Access.

Ratepayer Benefit Account
SB _XX
Deposits in the account any refunds or net cash resulting from (a) any refunds ordered by FERC or from litigation, and (b) any positive DWR Power Fund revenues; all to be refunded to ratepayers through either bill credits or rate reductions in proportion to the March, 2001 PUC rate increase.
SB 78XX(amended)
Does not create a Ratepayer Benefit Account.

Electric Supplier Claims Settlement Trust
SB _XX and SB 78XX
Does not create a Trust or trustee to negotiate reductions.

Renewable Energy
SB _XX
Creates a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) to achieve a target of 10% of all new generating capacity additions through 2010 and overall 20% of statewide total generating capacity by 2010.  Munis have been exempted from the RPS.
SB 78XX(amended)
No provisions for renewable energy.


---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001 02:54 PM
---------------------------

jeffrey.darst@ps.ge.com on 04/24/2001 02:41:17 PM
To: Ben.Jacoby@enron.com
cc: chris.booth@enron.com, chasecl@pssch.ps.ge.com, john.schroeder@ps.ge.com
Subject: FW: Blue Dog Max, comments on draft CO No. 2, rev of 4/23/01

Ben

I have made some revisions, per the attachment.

Changes to article 2.6 were originally proposed on March 8th.  There has
been no comment to these changes.

Additionally, changes/additions have been made to article 2.7.

>  <<CO#2-R71 changes.doc>>
>
I have not received a signed copy of the Consent to Assignment to E-Next
Generation LLC.  Please fax this to me.

Regards,

Jeff
Global Power Plant Systems
518-385-0663
518-381-1513 (fax)

 - CO#2-R71 changes.doc


[IMAGE]	?

The 16-31 December edition of designzine.com  includes a number of
hot-off-the-press articles from our member ,zines. You,ll  find discussions
on still-active, over-90-year-old designers, in Metropolis.  Investigate
different views on the meaning of new "luxury," in Modo.  And you can
discover the story behind a new concept for the universal shopping  cart, in
bOx.

There are our audios to listen to, one by me and  another by art historian
Grace Jeffers. If you don,t have the necessary software,  go to RealPlayer
where you can get  a free download. I love RealPlayer; it means that I can
tune into radio stations  from all over the world, anytime of the day or
night.

And please don,t forget to visit designstand.com,  our brand-new design-store
companion site.

Cordially,

Mel Byars
Editorial Director
designzine.com

?

?

If you would like to remove your e-mail address from  our mailing list,
please click here.

?

?

?


Stan always prefers to do face to face with these kind of meetings.   So I will be checking on schedules next week.

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Harris [mailto:keith.harris@wessexwater.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Hayslett, Rod
Subject: RE: Risk management

Rod

We normally involve Colin, my financial controller Nigel Reed, the Ops
Director Sam Allen, and myself

Propose that we continue that.  The question is whether we need a face to
face.  We have done it by phone -  but I guess that reflects the fact that
the AZX guys were comfortable with us.  Its your call.  We would be more
than happy to do a face to face

regards

Keith

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod [mailto:Rod.Hayslett@ENRON.com]
Sent: 11 July 2001 14:47
To: Keith Harris
Cc: Geaccone, Tracy
Subject: RE: Risk management

How many of you would you think need to be involved in a budget review
of Wessex?     I am trying to make the costs be the lowest, but Stan
think's it need's to be face to face.    Typically Stan would like most
of the management team in attendance, but if you and Colin have a
preference let me know and I will attempt to get it planned out.

For reference purposes, Tracy Geaccone is responsible for pulling
together and understanding Stan's numbers (in addition to being my right
and left hands) , so you and your people will probably start to hear
more from her.

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the Wessex Water IT Support Centre on:

44-1225-528888 or email support@wessexwater.co.uk

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************


Team

Attached for your reference is  List of Documents (with short descriptions)
relating to the Pacific Virgo. The documents form my Core Bundle which I have
only had the chance to assemble today. I believe you would have copies of the
documents either from the bundle I couriered to Mike R. or from e-mail, but
if you have any missing, please let me know and I'll get copies to you. I
will keep the List up to date and copy the Houston team. As usual, I welcome
any comments.

I will be working to put together a similar list for sampling and test
results and will copy the team as soon as I can.

Some material documents on the Tank Cleaning issue:

Costs were to be borne by Enron (item 4 of the List).
Enron regarded USD30,000 estimate for Butterworth cleaning by Owners too high
and revised cleaning request to flushing with fresh water (item 8 of the
List).
Owners did not have enough freshwater and proposed seawater flushing (item 9
of the List).
Enron queried Owners on why there was insufficient fresh water for tank
cleaning (no explanation to date) and reserved rights under C/P (item 10 of
the List).
Enron gave orders to flush with fresh water and emphasised sensitivity of
cargo for power plant (item 11 of the List).
Owners advised not able to flush with freshwater and no tank cleaning was
performed before last cargo of Cossack was loaded (item 13 of the List).
Enron expressed disappointment that there was no fresh water to flush tanks
and requested draining and stripping dry (item 16 of the List).
Enron asked Master the day before loading what preparations were done, but
there we never got a reply (item 17 of the List).
SGS vessel tank inspection states "Master / Chief Officer guarantees the
integrity of the cargo whilst the same is on board" (item 18 of the List) -
have asked SGS for a copy with Master/Chief Officer's signature.

Pacific Virgo ETA Yosu Korea 23rd night. Earliest commencement of discharge
24th morning.

Britt - Thanks for the list of questions. They help me focus with so much
going on here. I'll respond with answers as soon as I can although I expect
that I would need to consult with John Chismar (Trader - who is on vacation
and due back 1st August) on some of them.

Regards
Matt


Lucy,

You wrote fewer checks this month.  Spent more money on Materials and less on
Labor.

   June  July  August

Total Materials  2929  4085  4801

Services  53  581  464

Labor   3187  3428  2770

Here are my questions on the August bank statement (attached):

1.  Check 1406  Walmart    Description and unit?

2.  Check 1410  Crumps     Detail description and unit?

3.  Check 1411  Lucy      What is this?

4.  Check 1415  Papes      Detail description and units?

5.  Checks 1416, 1417, and 1425  Why overtime?

6.  Check 1428    Ralph's   What unit?

7.  Check 1438    Walmart?    Description and unit?

Try and pull together the support for these items and get back to me.

Phillip


Thanks for the note and I enjoyed seeing you the other night.  We are working
with Jeff's assistant on the date.  It looks like it may be possible but
there are a few conflicts to dodge.  We will be in touch soon.  Thanks

"Ehud I. Ronn" <eronn@mail.utexas.edu> on 09/20/2000 11:12:46 AM
To: rcausey@enron.com, vkamins@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Spring 2001 Conference Participation by Jeffrey K. Skilling

Rick / Vince,

Good morning.

In my 9/14 e-mail, I advised you of the practitioner-industry CEFER (Center
for Energy Finance Education and Research) Conference we are planning for
Spring 2001.  As you know, we would like to invite Jeff Skilling to be the
keynote speaker at the Thur. evening dinner.  The following day's four
topics consist of Risk management, Deregulation, Real options, and
International/globalization.  The majority of invitees would be
(predominantly U. S.-based) energy-industry practitioners, as well as
several academics.

Given lead time issues in these matters, we have reserved hotel rooms in
Austin for Feb. 22, 2001.  Could I ask you to ascertain Jeff Skilling's
availability for that evening?

Thanks,
Ehud Ronn

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Professor of Finance and Jack S. Josey Professor in Energy Studies
     Director, Center for Energy Finance Education and Research
     McCombs School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


Interesting.  The recruiter listed for the postings you described is Chris
Williams.


Bobbie,

Here are the enovate confirms that we discussed.

Dan did a confirm for Oneok which I do not have.

Stacy


Thanks Barbara:
Dorothy just phoned me and I believe we're all squared away.  Can you call
her and make sure that you're comfortable?

Best,
Jeff

	BRBarkovich <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>
	07/09/2001 06:15 PM

		 To: dhunter@s-k-w.com, jdasovic@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: changes to Jeff's language

In definition of spot market service, I would change 30 days to at least
90 days, not require the choice of there is no longer a competitive and
viable retail market, and maybe require the utility to come up with
something within that 90 day period.  I would also take out the language
that was added at the end of the first sentence and not replace it
unless we can get a clearer statement from Jeff of what he means.
Jeff-can you come up with something clearer? Barbara


Hi Jon,

Can you price up the three files attached please?

Thanks, Mark


---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 05/10/2000
02:01 PM ---------------------------
From: Ted Murphy@ECT on 05/08/2000 12:44 PM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Authorized Traders

Gentlemen (and I use the term loosely!):
Now that you have been duly authorized by the COO and CRO of Enron to have
global risk responsibility, you need to authorize the individual responsible
for each individual commodity group delineated in the Risk Management
Policy.  I took the liberty of making a stab at it for you.  Please review
attachment and let me know if you have  any changes.  If ok, I will forward
to you for your signature and on to Rick Buy to make official.  These
individuals will then be responsible for designating those that can transact
on their behalf.
Any questions, please call me asap.
Ted x3-3324


April 20, 2001

              ***April Scheduled Maintenance Update***

PG&E Gas Transmission Northwest (GTN) will perform scheduled maintenance at
Station 3 and Station 13 C-unit from April 23-29, 2001.  The capacity at
Kingsgate will be reduced to 2,310 MMcf/d.

The Station 8 maintenance has been canceled.

For questions or additional assistance, please contact a Transportation
Coordinator at (503) 833-4300.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Just to give you all a heads up...

Jeff Skilling has asked for a revenue number for EOL that represents what
Enron reports on our financial statements (including the Mark-to-Market value
of all of our open positions resulting from EOL trading).   We are
specifically looking for MTM value as of the close of trading on the 15th and
would like to be able to review the results by mid-afternoon (Houston) on the
16th.   We will need each desk to calculate their EOL-specific MTM value and
consolidate this information at the Commodity Group level (ie. U.S. Power,
Global Liquids, N. American Gas, etc.) and return it to the Product Control
Group (Torrey Moorer/Carrie Southard) by mid-afternoon on the 16th (Houston)
in order to combine the information into a report for delivery on the 17th.
We are primarily interested in the total MTM value of our open EOL positions,
but if it is possible to provide a breakout for the MTM value of EOL physical
sales, this would help us break out the revenue numbers.   If you have
questions, please contact Torrey Moorer at x36218.

Thank you!
Sheri


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

Note: The Executive Summary transaction counts have been reduced to reflect the
          removal of sleeve trade activity.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Thanks a lot for sending! And for cleaning out the old trades that had been
in there for a while.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-tradersnewsindexes@littleblue.ipgdirect.com
[mailto:owner-tradersnewsindexes@littleblue.ipgdirect.com]On Behalf Of
Christopher.Watts@enron.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 1:37 AM
To: tradersnewsindexes@ipgdirect.com; kayne.coulter@enron.com;
don.baughman@enron.com
Subject: traders news indexes 4-03-01

(See attached file: 04_03_01 IPG INDEX REPORT.xls)


I would like to change our policy regarding taping telephone trades.  I
propose the following:

1.   Retention Period  -- change the retention period from 4 months to 2
months

2.  Record Only Deal Terms -- change from taping everything to taping only
the deal terms at the end of a call

The first change could be made immediately and the second change would
require both reprogramming (Phillippe is looking at this) and training of the
traders to press the record button at the end of a call to record the deal
terms.  Let me know your thoughts on the proposed changes.

Mark Haedicke


scheije@selectenergy.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

I apologize for the larger circulation of this email than to just the S&P
WG.

The MC last week urged a rapid consideration of the interactions between
BME and SCD and their related prices from the hot, high load days of July
24 and 25.

To pursue this there is additional information needed from the ISO. Below
is a preliminary list I compiled that would be useful in assessing the
situation.

Data should be provided for relevant hours i.e. those with high BME or RT
prices or both. Particularly for those hours with binding reserve
constraints in HA or RT.

1 RT reserve levels in each hour (it is recognized that the value
fluctuates but the the point is to get an idea of apporximately how short
the ISO was of reserves, if at all)

2 Similar information should be obtained for our neighbors; PJM, NE and
IMO. Also, could the ISO describe what the others do hour ahead to prepare
for the next operating hour under circumstances such as we encountered
those two days? NY has the unfortunate position of producing prices related
to decisions for which it pays otherwise - what were our neighbors doing?

3 An accounting, by hour, of reserves carried on exports out of NY

4 Identification of any non-ICAP based exports that may have been counted
for reserve; this shouldn't happen as it puts non-ICAP providers in the
position of being recalled...

5 BME reserve deficiencies by hour; were the reserve levels always met,
albeit at extreme prices, or was the ISO unable to cover the requirements
in advance?

6 Based on Mike Calimano's report, there were "a couple hundred Mws" of
operating units not seen by BME; this situation needs to be (1) confirmed
and (2) explained and corrected

The following are sort of 2nd tier questions:

1 If the ISO was short of reserves in RT why weren't the EDRP resources,
who were notified, not called into play to aid in curing the deficiency?
There should have been no economic judgement call by operators (if the
first two hours were at $500 that was likely cheaper than what BME was
taking in if the BME prices applied to settlement under ECA B). BME made no
judgement call when its prices spiked due to the 30 M NSR scarcity and took
available imports.

2 What would have been the System State(s) if the reserve margins had been
held in RT (assuming ISO was short in RT)? Would this have forced a Major
Emergency and subsequent voltage reductions, public appeals etc? Had this
been done would have the EDRP Mws been activated?

I would also like to offer the following as potential changes to be
considered. They are based on the limited discussions that have taken place
so far.

1 Include exports that are being counted as reserve in BME as it evaluates
its reserve position. Since BME is deciding which transactions will be
scheduled, operators would need to indicate which transactions and how many
Mws could be counted in RT as reserves. The implications for the solution
algorithm are unclear - can BME recognize the additional reserves thus
carried? Would it result in fewer imports and lower BME prices? What if the
reserve requirements used as input to BME were manipulated downward for
reserves on exports? What happens if BME did not schedule the export(s)?

2 Subject to the ISO providing detailed RT reserve info, it seems that the
reserves should be carried in RT and that SCD should not be allowed to
dispatch with units that were not available to BME (thus resulting in the
large price disparities). If the ISO had adequate reserves in RT, SCD
should not be allowed to produce RT price reductions relative to what BME
is doing. However, having said this, if there are no energy resources to
maintain reserve levels AND the ISO needs to maintain its regulation room,
the next thing to go is load. To my long understanding, we do not shed load
to avoid shedding load (at least not to maintain reserves...)

Perhaps if BME has some adjustments and the missing Mws are accounted for,
little needs to be done in RT. (This does not mean that SCD handles GTs
correctly - that is still a commit problem it is incapable of resolving...)

3 At one point, we had approved use of BME prices to settle all HA
transactions. This approach was scuttled by the ISO when they discovered
that there were persistent, unidirectional price differences between the
proxy busses and their connected in-NY zones. We then retreated to
automating what is done under ECA B; substituting BME prices only under
constrained ramp or ATC conditions.

The ISO should review this again. Does the price difference remain,
inviting gaming? If so, is there a way for the MMU to watch for or prevent
inappropriate opportunistic behavior? A full, partial 3rd settlement would
lessen the sting of HA prices that are out of synch with RT.

4 The ISO should review the multipliers in the LP solution that insure that
energy, then regulation and then the 3 types of reserve are maintained.
They should be no more than required for a proper solution outcome. Prices
at $65000 are not necessary and misleading (while mathematically
correct...). Also, if we are to consider settling transactions at BME
prices, such an outcome would result in considerable opposition...

5 Another non-controversial change would be to extend the DADRP
participants to hour ahead evaluation. In the instant circumstance, it is
likely that BME would have chosen some of those loads opposed to imports
(there was no congestion so some of those western loads might have looked
pretty good...). Since there is the issue that the DADRP is subsidized, I
would propose that, if extended to BME, that the DA bids be used for BME
evaluation. If nothing else look at it as sending money to companies in
NYS.

Jim


Exhibit D is, it turns out, appropriately named Exhibit D.

__________________

Mitch -- Following our discussions,  attached for your review is a
"Supplemental Agreement" (unchanged from what you had reviewed before) and a
revised draft Attachment A thereto.   Please forward to Frank Hilton, etc.
for review so that we may now  complete the EEI master.

I have reviewed the revised final EEI cover sheet (attached below) e-mailed
to me by you earlier today  and confirm that the CAISO definition has been
substituted appropriately.  Also attached below is a sample copy of the
Exhibit B (56 pages, and apparently labelled Exhibit D, to be rectified
later), contemplated by the Cover Sheet for incorporation of prior
transactions, identifying open trades as of next Monday December 11th.

 I look forward to hearing from you.  Best regards, David

 - EEI AEP-Enron 12-00.DOC


Yes, the agreement was dated 7/12/00 and had a two year term.

	Daniel Diamond
	03/07/2001 05:55 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Do we still have a confidentiality in place with Red Meteor?

-Dan


Kathy,

I believe Ben needs to initial the change order, and he's on vacation this
week.

Kay

To: Mike Miller/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Change Order #2 to LM6000 Purchase Agreement

Mike,

Attached for your review and signature is Change Order No. 2 to the LM6000
Purchase Agreement.  I am forwarding it to Kay and David for their approval
for you.

Regards.
Kathy Clark
x56400


The consent form should be kept in PH file.   The background check results should be maintained separately.  MHC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arguijo, Cheryl
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 12:52 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle; Sweet, Twanda
Cc:	Goode, Diane
Subject:	Background Checks

Unfortunately I was unable to attend the session today regarding background checks.  Can you please tell me what we are supposed to do with the original signed consent forms?  I thought we were supposed to shred them, but I was told that we are supposed to file them with the original background check report in the PH file.  I know from several of the staffers that today you clarified that we are not supposed to keep the background check reports in the PH file, but in a separate file.  I would appreciate your clarification of where the consent forms are to be kept.

Thank you,
Cheryl Arguijo
EWS Staffing
713-345-4016


Mark:
Here are my individual goals for 2000 which I would like to discuss with you
when you have some time.
Carol


Jay,

I've always taken a pretty laid back approach to the noncompete when there is
little overlap.  Having said that, however, I'd like to keep a "last veto"
right - just give me a call when you've got something.

Good luck to you in the future, Jay.  You'll be missed at Enron.

Best regards,
Jeff

Jay Fitzgerald@ECT
05/09/2001 08:55 AM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: My Resignation, and a Question

Jeff-

As you may know, I have (somewhat reluctantly) decided to resign from Enron.
For some time now, I have wanted to take some time off, and had asked Whalley
about the possibility for a six month unpaid, unvested sabbatical.  Primarily
for reasons of precedence, he was unwilling to pursue this option, which,
while it is disappointing to me, I accept.

The purpose of this note is twofold.

First, I would like to thank you for making this company the great place it
is today, and for giving me the opportunity to have a great career here.  I
will forever look upon my nine plus years with Enron fondly.

Second, I would like to ask you as the administrator of the 1997 Long Term
Incentive Plan to allow me to explore opportunities in the venture capital
community without triggering non-compete provisions with regard to future
payouts.  I very much enjoyed my brief role in venture capital, and have some
very good contacts in that area here in New York.  Since NetWorks decided to
cease operations in that business earlier in the year, I should not think
that Enron would view anything I might do there as competitive, especially if
I were not working directly in the energy space with an Enron competitor.

At present, I am planning to spend my time at least through the summer
enjoying, and travelling with, my family.  I have nothing planned
professionally as of yet, but wanted to take the opportunity to drop you this
note while I might still be viewed positively (I hope that's not too
presumptuous!).

Please let me know your thoughts on this non-compete provision as I would not
wish for anything to be awkward for us going forward.

Again Jeff, thanks for many great memories, and as an Enron shareholder, keep
up the great work!

Jay


Letter to Carl Harris
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
 - Letter to Carl Harris.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2000
11:46 AM ---------------------------

Carol St Clair
05/08/2000 11:32 AM
To: kidventure@hypercon.com
cc:
Subject: Camp Registration

To whom it may concern:
This morning I filled at an online registration form for Camp Enron for my
son Arthur for the June 26-30 and July 10-14 sessions.  I wish to confirm
your receipt of my application.  I also wanted to know who I should send the
release form to.  My phone number is 713-853-3989 and my e-mail address is
Carol.St.Clair@enron.com.

Thank you.

Carol


David/Sam/Sandi/Jeff,

I want to thank you for taking the time to meet with Mike, Gary and I last
week at your offices in San Francisco.  The meetings were very informative
and will certainly help us in our strategy development.  I sent out the
weekly report to all of you this morning and will keep you on the list,
unless you request to be removed.  I hope that our team can call upon you
from time to time for advice and assistance.

I was short of cards, so for those that didn't get my contact details, please
see below:

Kurt Lindahl
Director, Commercial, Global LNG
P.O. Box 1188
Houston, Tx. 77251-1188

713 345 2703 (O)
713 646 7768 (F)
713 515 2759 (M)

Kurt.Lindahl@enron.com - email

Regards,

Kurt Lindahl


In an effort to pull the pieces together, a meeting has been scheduled to
discuss the draft energy and capacity contract (formerly the PPA).  It is
scheduled for Thursday, August 24th, at 900am.  We are still in the process
of locating a conference room, so the location is TBD.

Thanks,

Kay

Here are the most recent comments from VEPCO:

Some of you may have received this already.  I have not compared it against
what we last sent them.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000
01:30 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Phillip K Allen                           03/13/2000 11:31 AM

To: William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Priority List

Will,

Here is a list of the top items we need to work on to improve the position
and p&l reporting for the west desk.
My underlying goal is to create position managers and p&l reports that
represent all the risk held by the desk
and estimate p&l with great accuracy.

Let's try and schedule a meeting for this Wednesday to go over the items
above.

Phillip


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - kournikovapriceless.jpg


Bill, in response to your request, here is the last version of the LV
Cogen/GE Agreement.  To complete it we will need to insert the date of
execution and Exhibit H-2.

-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Peter J.
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:57 PM
To: Kay Mann (E-mail); Bill Williams (E-mail); Dale Rasmussen (E-mail);
Lee. Johnson (E-mail); Kent. Shoemaker (E-mail)
Cc: Pipitone, Paul; Cobb, Chris
Subject: LV Cogen Turbine Agreement

Attached please find the latest LV Cogen Turbine Agreement (second
document below) that provides notices to Enron North America, as agent
for E-Next Generation, and changes to the signature blocks.  Also
attached is a blackline (first document below) showing changes made to
the version circulated on April 10. Pursuant to instructions received
from Kay Mann and Bill Williams, this version does not contain the
contractor's comments.  To complete the agreement, we will need to
insert the date of execution and Exhibit H-2.
 <<Comparison of LV Cogen Agreement, Versions 3 to 5.DOC>>  <<LV Cogen
Gas Turbine Agreement - Version 5.DOC>>
 - Comparison of LV Cogen Agreement, Versions 3 to 5.DOC
 - LV Cogen Gas Turbine Agreement - Version 5.DOC


Marty Klepper just called and wanted to know where he can send something to you tomorrow.  Do you want me to give him the Inwood address?  Also, he wants you to call him at 202-371-7120.  Are you coming back to work?


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042404.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2


---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 05/13/99 10:04 AM
---------------------------

Mary Ogden on 05/13/99 09:25:03 AM
To: Stephen W Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M
Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra
Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Texas college jokes

>THERE'S ONE IN HERE TO OFFEND ALMOST EVERYONE'S TEXAS ALMA MATER!!!
>
>* How many UT students does it take to screw in a light bulb?
>Fifty - one to screw it in, and the other 49 to complain because a person
>of their race, gender, or sexual preference didn't get to screw in the
>light bulb.
>
>* How many Rice students does it take to screw in a light bulb?
>One to screw it in and the rest of the student body to relieve the stress
>of screwing it in by running naked through campus.
>(No way!  Any true Rice student knows the only true reason to run naked
>around campus is to get free beer at Valhalla......)
>
>* How many TCU students does it take to screw in a light bulb?
>Four - one to call Daddy to do it and the other three to find the perfect
>coordinating J. Crew outfits.
>
>* How many Texas Tech students does it take to screw in a light bulb?
>All of them: One to screw it in and the rest of the students to try
>desperately to establish a rivalry with the other Big XII schools in light
>bulb screwing.
>
>* How many U of Houston students does it take to screw in a light bulb?
>None. They don't want the gangs to know that they're in there.
>
>* How many Univ. North Texas students does it take to screw in a light
>bulb?
>Who cares?
>
>* How many Baylor students does it take to screw in a light bulb?
>None. Light bulbs are the child of Satan.
>
>* How many SMU students does it take to screw in a light bulb?
>Two. One to make the martinis and the other to hire someone else to screw
>the bulb in.
>
>* How many Aggies does it take to screw in a light bulb?
>Three - one to screw it in, one to call it a tradition and the other to
>lead the yell "Screw the Hell Outta the Light bulb!"
>
>* How many Stephen F. Austin students?
>3 - One to screw it in and two to laugh uncontrollably at the sexual
>connotations.
>
>* SWT Students?
>4 - One to screw it in, two to move the keg into place and one to load the
>bong.
>
>* Sam Houston State Students?
>None - they would just move back into their parents' house in Houston.
>
>* Texas Southern Students?
>Two - one to screw it in and the other to buy a candle from Bath &
>BodyWorks ; the school couldn't pay the electric bill this month.
>


I don't think that we should have any volume on this deal.  It seems like Jan
2000 was added after the fact to assist with allocations.  But it was later
determined that we didn't purchase anything from Copano.

D

	Kimberly Vaughn
	01/30/2001 09:40 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Deal 93481

Daren,

I'm looking into this deal.   There is no volume on this deal for January
00.     Should this deal have had some volume on it.
It was never scheduled with volume  however, in January it received flow of
3461 due to ranking in POPS.  It was taken to zero once the actuals came in.

Please let me know if you intended to have volume on this deal for Jan 00

THANKS


Mark,
Here is the electronic form for the Interconnect and Operating Agreement for
your legal folks.  Talk to you soon!

Bob Burleson
09/06/2000 03:35 PM
To: Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: EOG Agreement

Here is the electronic form of the agreement.  Thanks for your help,  Bob


What issues were invented?

Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
06/02/2000 01:28 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Enron Monterrey/Vitro

Jeff and Reynaldo Garcia spoke on this subject at length, and Rey convinced
Jeff that spitting was necessary.  AT that time the Enron Contracting entity
was not specified to be Energia...    If you want to unsplit the documents it
will add additional time in excess geting a consolidation agreement completed
I think.  Please include Rey in your quest for closure.  PS  GE is now OK
with the split.

I need help getting closure on the Consolidation Agreement.  I hope that we
do not invent other issues as well.


Best of luck.  Stay in touch.  You thinking of working in France?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gaillard, Bruno
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:57 AM
To:	Cooper, Adam N; Dawson, Paul; Dindarova, Nailia; Duvauchelle, Antoine; Elms, Nick; Gaillard, Bruno; Glen, Merle; Gonzalez, David; Haizmann, Jan; Hennemeyer, Paul; Huertas, Alfredo; Hussain, Mustafa; Irwin, Kerryann; Keenan, Amber; Milano, Pamela; Pigmans, Mabel; Styles, Peter; Van Biert, Teun; Wood, Doug; Brun, Raphael; Brod, Simon; Davies, Philip; Sankey, Ross; de Gaulle, Pierre; Favand, Alexandre; Magne, Didier; Barouki, Patrick; Asplin, Stephen; Mead, Paul; Shapiro, Richard; Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff; Petrochko, Mona L.; Alamo, Joseph; Dernehl, Ginger; Linnell, Elizabeth; Frank, Robert; Hemstock, Robert; Kean, Steven J.; Hanks, Kyran
Subject:	Moving On

Y'all,

It was great working with all of you in the US and the UK.

I am now moving on to possible opportunities on the European Continent.

Below are my current coordinates and permanent personal email.

Tel: + 44 (0) 20 8255 0848
Mobile: + 44 (0) 7747 110 326
email: bgaillard@yahoo.com

Good luck to all

Bruno


The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed
or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000034917&Page=
MyReq.


You have received this email because you are listed as an alternate data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000080902&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000080902
Approver            : phillip.m.love@enron.com
Request Create Date : 1/14/02 11:44:34 AM
Requested For       : hal.mckinney@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\ERMS\erms_adm\FIRMTRAD - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory


As we discussed, attached is the final form of the merger agreement with the related disclosure schedules.  The Merger Agreement will be filed with the SEC.  The disclosure schedules will not become public documents.  As such, please do not redistribute the disclosure schedules.  I would appreciate your informing me of anyone else you feel needs to see the disclosure schedules, as opposed to a specific reference in any particular disclosure schedule.  When discussing any particular exception in the disclosure schedules, please pass on the confidential nature of the disclosure schedules.  Thank you.  Lance.

W. Lance Schuler
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone: 713/853-5419
Fax:  281/664-4890
Email:  lance.schuler-legal@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sarah.Cooper@bakerbotts.com@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 5:50 PM
To:	Schuler, Lance (Legal); john.o'shea@dynegy.com
Cc:	Kevin.Blodgett@dynegy.com; Tull.Florey@bakerbotts.com
Subject:	*Merger Agreement and partial disclosure letters

As we discussed -- attached are the Merger Agreement, the full Dynegy
disclosure letter, and the Enron disclosure letter (but not the attachments,
which will follow once the PDF is prepared).
 <<Gipper Disclosure Letter.DOC>>  <<Merger Agreement for Project
Gipper.DOC>>  <<Rockne Disclosure Letter.DOC>>

 - Gipper Disclosure Letter.DOC
 - Merger Agreement for Project Gipper.DOC
 - Rockne Disclosure Letter.DOC


Hi John,

It would probably be better for me if we could reschedule, since I will be
out of town Wed-Mon.

Rain check?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/01/2001 08:35
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           04/30/2001 08:00 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> @ ENRON
cc: Kay Mann

Subject: Re: Astros Game

Unfortunately, I have a public hearing in Florida that I have to attend.
Thanks for the invite, though.

Regards,

Ben

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 04/30/2001 06:20:48 PM
To: "Ben F. Jacoby (E-mail)" <Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Astros Game

Ben-let me know if you can join me for an Astros game on May 8 (Tuesday) at
7:05.  Kay is coming as well.

Regards

John L. Keffer
King & Spalding
713 751 3255
713 751 3280 (fax)
jkeffer@kslaw.com

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


The PPO - Power Purchase Option - is a unique program based on the IL restructuring law.  Texas has no analogous service.

I agree with your statement that we don't need an RTO, we need to fix the physical retail transmission rules.  It's important to keep consistent messages.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:28 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Migden, Janine
Subject:	FW: ICC Meeting

Jim -- Would Entergy in Texas have a PPO?  In your testimony at the Texas PUC we argued that a retail program doesn't necessarily need an RTO -- it does need the ability to go physical on a fair basis, including rational imbalance provisions of the TP OATT--not punitive.  Here we are stating that there should be a continuation of ComEd's PPO until there is a functioning wholesale market, including a good imbalance provision.  Should the argument go more toward that retail physical could work if ComED changed certain tariff provisions now, even without a PPO?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Migden, Janine
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 3:42 PM
To:	Ader, Jeff; Allegretti, Daniel; Baughman, Edward D.; Bernstein, Mark; Boston, Roy; Burrows, John; Clynes, Terri; Courtney, Mark; Decker, Charles; Detina, Ken; Frazier, J Ryan; Gahn, Scott; Hueter, Barbara A.; Kingerski, Harry; Letke, Eric; Lewis, James; Mastrangelo, Lino; Merola, Jeff; Migden, Janine; Nicolay, Christi L.; Persson, Roger; Roan, Michael; Sewell, Doug; Shapiro, Richard; Sharfman, Guy; Sharp, Greg; Snyder, Brad; Steffes, James D.; Stoness, Scott; Landwehr, Susan M.; Ulrich, Marc; Whalan, Jubran; Wood, James; Young, Ress
Subject:	ICC Meeting

The ICC Energy Committee held a meeting to discuss ComEd's proposal to drop the PPO.  We argued that this should not be allowed until the wholesale market/delivery issues are dealt with because otherwise customers will have no choice but to return to ComEd at the higher bundled rate.  The good news is that a rather lengthy discussion on this issue ensued as a result.  The industrial customer group and Mid American Energy supported our views; however AES New Energy said that this was not a problem for them.

We also commented that once the PPO goes away it should not be resurrected due to the uncertainty it would create in the market.  ComEd responded that under the statute they can not offer to waive the PPO but could negotiate an arrangement on the CTC if approached by the customer.  This would mean that we could negotiate on behalf of all our customers regarding the CTC.

We have the opportunity to file comments to the Commissioners before the actual filing.  A draft is attached.

 << File: Commissioner Terry Harvill.doc >>

If you have any comments, please respond by the end of the week.


i'm jealous.  it can't be that hot.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:43 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

sweating

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:42 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

no, i'm frozen again.  i need a heater.  what are you doing?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

are you thawed

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:38 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i had to go thaw.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:33 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

where did you go


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2001 03:49 PM -----

	James D Steffes@ENRON
	05/11/2001 03:08 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: California Litigation

Richard --

Need to include Bob Frank.  I've asked him to get involved with these matters
given his legal background.

Thanks,

Jim

From: Richard B Sanders@ECT on 05/11/2001 02:07 PM
To: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
mlk@pkns.com, sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com

Subject: Re:

I have asked my asst, Twanda Sweet, to set up a meeting w/ you, Jeff
Dasovich, Jim Steffes, Mike Kirby and Robin Gibbs for Monday or Tues.
regarding the strategy to deal with Sen. Dunn. Should we include anyone else?

	Sandra McCubbin@ENRON
	05/10/2001 05:16 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

need to talk to you about Dunn's hearing in Irvine next week....it will be on
may 18th...Loretta Lynch will be testifying as will Bob Pease, legal director
of FERC..because this is an offsite hearing, I don't know if they will be
taping it..they will have a court reporter...I will attend, but I didn't know
if you wanted to send an attorney.


Hi Folks,

Footballguy Scott Luebke takes a look at this week's players who are moving
up and down in value.

IMPORTANT NOTE:  Remember that Dallas, and Oakland are on byes this week in
addition to Miami, Seattle and San Francisco.   Dallas and Oakland were
originally scheduled to play but moved their game up.   This could affect
your team if you had planned on any Cowboys or Raiders filling in for your
Miami, Seattle and San Francisco players.   Don't get caught shorthanded and
make a pickup if you need to.

Also remember the Thursday game this week if your league has special rules
for turning in rosters.

Have a great week.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Upgrades

QBs Moving Up

QB - Jeff Garcia - Garcia looked great on Sunday against the Falcons with
332 passing yards, 70 rushing yards and 4 total touchdowns.  He continues to
prove that the 2000 season is no aberration.  As long as Terrell Owens
remains healthy, Garcia will continue to produce.  Very impressive on
Sunday.

QB - Steve McNair - After appearing invisible for the season heading into
Sunday, McNair shocked and impressed fantasy owners with 230 yards passing,
54 yards rushing and 2 total touchdowns against a solid Tampa Bay defense.
Although he was impressive on Sunday, don't rely on McNair as your fantasy
team starter on a weekly basis.  If McNair could get some big play weapons
on offense, he could become a top flight fantasy quarterback.  For now, be
happy with Sunday's performance.

QB - Vinny Testaverde - Testaverde impressed with an efficient performance
once again on Sunday.  Testaverde has yet to throw an interception this
season.  With 4 touchdowns in the last 2 games, Vinny is looking good.  Keep
in mind, Testaverde has yet to surpass the 200 yard barrier, so his value is
much higher in basic scoring leagues.

RBs Moving Up

RB - Ricky Williams - After a slow start to the season, Williams has gained
356 total yards and 2 touchdowns in his last 2 games.  Keep in mind,
Williams has already had his bye, so he should be a fixture in your lineup
for the remainder of the season as long as he stays healthy.

RB - Eddie George - George finally delighted fantasy owners with 132 total
yards and a touchdown on Sunday.  The patient owner will start to see the
rewards of having George on the roster for the remainder of the season.
With George having Miami, Jacksonville, Baltimore, Tampa Bay and a bye week
in the first 5 weeks of the season, his schedule was difficult.  The
schedule only gets easier for George during the remainder of the season.
Look for a strong finish to the season out of George.

RB - Priest Holmes - With Tony Richardson out of the lineup, Holmes was
given the chance to produce and he has not disappointed.  During his last 3
games, Holmes has averaged 158 total yards and scored 5 touchdowns.  More
importantly, Holmes has apparently claimed the feature back role in the
Kansas City offense.  Look for Holmes to ride the "production train" for the
next few weeks with matchups against Arizona and Indianapolis.

RB - Warrick Dunn - Expected to be out 4-6 weeks, Dunn returned to the
lineup after a 1 week absence and delighted fantasy owners.  Despite having
just 16 yards rushing, Dunn added 65 yards receiving and 2 touchdowns.  The
early return gives Dunn a tremendous upgrade.

RB - Shaun Alexander - Will Ricky Watters have the starting job when he
returns from injury?  Probably not.  Alexander finished with 142 rushing
yards and 2 touchdowns against Denver.  With Watters in the last year of his
contract, look for the Seahawks to keep Alexander in the starting lineup for
the remainder of the season.  A great keeper/dynasty running back.

RB - Ron Dayne - After being limited in practice by a neck injury suffered
in the Washington game, Dayne hit the field and a delighted fantasy owners.
With 88 rushing yards and a touchdown on Sunday, Dayne continues to gain
momentum into being named the team's feature back.  With Tiki Barber
hampered by a hamstring injury, Dayne will be able to post quality numbers
against some poor defenses.

WRs Moving Up

WR - Keyshawn Johnson - Johnson took over the game with 8 catches for 140
yards against Tennessee.  However, he has yet to connect with Brad Johnson
for a receiving touchdown this season.

WR - Kevin Johnson - Johnson was able to beat a bad Cincinnati secondary for
a career high 153 yards receiving on Sunday.  With the continued development
of Tim Couch, Johnson could be a quality fantasy option for the remainder of
the season.  Keep in mind, Cleveland plays in a tough division where low
scoring games will be the norm.

WR - Terry Glenn - Once thought to be written off for the entire season,
Glenn returned in a big way on Sunday with 110 yards and a touchdown.  If
the Patriots offensive line can protect the quarterback, Glenn could have a
decent remainder of the season.  Don't expect these type of numbers every
week.  Look for Glenn to put up inconsistent numbers the rest of the way.

WR - Terrell Owens - 183 receiving yards and 3 touchdowns deserves an
upgrade in my book.  Basically, keep him in your lineup every week.

WR - Germane Crowell - Crowell finished with 125 yards and a touchdown on
Sunday.  Everything looked good with Charlie Batch at the helm for the
passing game.  Reality check...this game was against the hapless Vikings
secondary.  Regardless, 125 yards and a touchdown deserves the upgrade.

TEs Moving Up

TE - Cam Cleeland - Despite having just 3 catches for 38 yards on Sunday,
Cleeland was able to get into the scoring column with the all important 2
touchdowns.  With opponents fearful of the Saints wide receiving corps of
Horn, Jackson and Crowell, Cleeland is seeing plenty of one on one coverage.
Cleeland is most likely on a fantasy roster.  If not, go get him.

TE - Bubba Franks - 2 reception for 4 yards.  Not that impressive, unless
you realize that both catches were touchdowns. Franks has scored 5
touchdowns in the first 5 games this season.  Look for continued success as
Franks is a key to success for the Packers in the red zone.

TE - Marcus Pollard - The Colts continue to get Pollard involved in the
offense.  He has averaged 58 receiving yards in the last 2 games while
scoring a touchdown.  However, Pollard ran a couple poor routes that led to
two interceptions for Manning.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Downgrades

QBs Moving Down

QB - Rob "The Running Joke" Johnson - Yep, that's right.  With the help of
all the sharks out there, we were able to once again downgrade Rob Johnson,
even with him being on a bye week.  After spending a few hours laughing
through numerous Rob Johnson takes, I was unable to come to a decision on
the best take.  With that said, I will let you, the sharks, decide the best
Rob Johnson downgrade take.  Cast your vote on the footballguystalk.com
message board.   Buffalo Fans, we feel your pain out there.   I know you
guys are some of the best fans in the league, we're just trying to lighten
things up.   Here are a few takes from some of our readers:

Take #1: I just took the SAT, and actually had this question. I think it
sums it up best.

Samuel L. Jackson is to Mr. Glass as Rob Johnson is to _______.
A) Mr. Styrofoam
B) Mr. Balsa Wood
C) Mr. Tin Foil
D) Mrs. Glass

I said D. What do you think, did I get it right?

Thanks
Jonathon Hoff

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Take #2: Rob Johnson took his heaviest blow this past week, injuring not
only his neck (pinched nerve), but also his "best side". Johnson was quoted
as saying "Sure, the neck hurts, but this bruise on my cheek is really going
to affect my promo photos. How's a guy supposed to make a living?" While
Johnson is day-to-day because of the neck, it appears his profile injury
will keep him out of the "pretty business" for 3-4 weeks. Adding insult to
injury, his agent apparently will have Flutie sub for Johnson during this
hiatus. The agent responded "Hey, when Johnson couldn't cut it on the
football field last year, Flutie kicked ass, so I suspect he can replace Rob
here, too." We're downgrading the Buffalo QB, and we'd keep Johnson on the
bench in fantasy football, and in fantasy modeling.

Guy Whitehead

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Take #3: Top 5 Reasons to downgrade Rob Johnson:

5. Silly headband brings back painful 80s memories

4. Deceased blues legend Robert Johnson is a more viable fantasy option

3. Janet Reno considers ordering agents to take Doug Flutie by force and
return him to his rightful home in Buffalo. Johnson might be sent to Cuba to
live with Elian Gonzalez. Castro to protest before United Nations and demand
Alex Van Pelt instead.

2. Sneaky agent includes bonus clause for appearing on injury report.

1. Jerry Jones praises Johnson as his "next big find".

Regards,
MKF

Seriously Now, Another QB Moving Down

QB - Trent Green - Green continues to disappoint fantasy owners.  With the
nagging injuries to Derrick Alexander and Marvin Minnis being inexperienced,
Green continues to have problems finding his wide receivers.  Prior to the
season, there was speculation that the loss of Sylvester Morris would hurt
Green's production.  The speculation was correct.

RBs Moving Down

RB - Ricky Watters - The emergence of Shaun Alexander downgrades the injured
Watters' value further.

RB - Marshall Faulk -   Faulk suffered a sprained MCL on Sunday.  Initial
indications speculated that Faulk would miss 4 weeks of action.  The next
reports had Faulk missing 1-2 games.   Now they're saying he could play this
week!   Regardless, make sure you grab Trung Canidate, if you are a Faulk
owner.   It'll help you sleep better.

RB - Tyrone Wheatley - Despite getting the carry at the goal line and a
short score, Wheatley gets the downgrade this week.  With just 7 carries for
24 yards and a fumble, it appears the Raiders are leaning towards making
Charlie Garner the feature back.  More importantly, Wheatley missed a key
pass block that led to a hard hit on Rich Gannon.  Basically, it appeared
that Wheatley shied away from contact on the play and did his best
bullfighter imitation.  Jon Gruden did not appear very happy.

RB - Mike Alstott - 5 carries for 4 yards...OUCH!

RB - Michael Bennett - Bennett was able to manage 13 carries on Sunday.
However, he finished with just 46 rushing yards and no touchdowns.  Plus,
Bennett suffered a sprained right ankle that forced him out of the game.
Keep him on your bench for the time being.

WRs Moving Down

WR - Bill Schroeder - Schroeder suffered a sprained ankle in Sunday's game
versus Baltimore.  The injury does not appear to be serious, but something
worth watching.  Because of the injury, Schroeder is downgraded this week.

WR - Derrick Alexander - Plain and simple, Alexander has done nothing this
season and is among the biggest disappointments of the fantasy season.
Alexander earns a spot on the "Biggest Disappointment Team".

WR - Willie Jackson - Although I am still high on Willie Jackson, he was
held to just 25 yards on 2 catches this weekend.  Every receiver will have
bad outings throughout the course of the year so this might be a little
harsh placing him here.   But it's a murky situation how the distribution
will play out in New Orleans.   QB Aaron Brooks needs to get it going.

WR - Wayne Chrebet - Chrebet has failed to score on the year and seems to
have taken a back seat to Laveranues Coles in the Jets wide receiving crew.
There's a chance Chrebet's numbers could increase as team's start focusing
their attention on the speedy Coles but for now, we're a little worried
about Chrebet.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Waiver Wire

QB - Charlie Batch - During comeback mode against the Vikings, Batch managed
to gain 345 yards and pass for 3 touchdowns.  Don't get too high on Batch
yet.  Remember, this performance came against a mediocre Vikings secondary.
However, Johnnie Morton and Germane Crowell provide Batch with two quality
receivers.  Look for more good games out of Batch...against weaker defenses.

QB - Tom Brady - With the addition of Terry Glenn in the lineup, Brady
torched the San Diego defense throughout the game.  Don't expect these kind
of numbers on a weekly basis, but there are signs that Brady has the
potential to become a good fantasy quarterback, although you have to
consider Bledsoe and what happens when he's ready to go.   Regardless, Brady
is a decent option for fantasy owners in need of a quarterback right now.

RB - Trung Canidate - Canidate will probably get at least start as the
running back for the powerful Rams offense.  Marshall Faulk was expected to
miss at least 4 weeks during initial reports.  The the next reports have
Faulk missing 1-2 weeks of action.   Now they're saying he could play this
week.   He's still not a bad guy to have for insurance.

RB - Anthony Thomas - Thomas continues to get a good number of carries.  It
is becoming more apparent that the Bears are slowly giving the feature back
role to Thomas.  Look for Thomas' role to become larger and larger as the
season progresses.

WR - Terry Glenn - Once thought to be written off for the entire season,
Glenn returned in a big way on Sunday with 110 yards and a touchdown.  If
the Patriots offensive line can protect the quarterback, Glenn could have a
decent remainder of the season.  Don't expect these type of numbers every
week, but Glenn could be a welcome addition to a fantasy team in need of a
receiver.

WR - Donald Hayes - With defenses rolling coverage in the direction of the
talented Muhsin Muhammad, Donald Hayes is seeing a lot of one-on-one
coverage.  With 7 catches and a touchdown on Sunday, it appears that Chris
Weinke and Hayes are starting to build a quality QB to WR relationship.

WR - Eddie Kennison - Kennison showed signs of quality production this week.
With Rod Smith seeing double/triple coverage on the other side of the field,
Kennison will be given a great chance to post excellent fantasy numbers.
Kennison is an extremely talented receiver and maybe this week's performance
was needed to get him "over the hump".

Check back next week for The General's All-Disappointment Team.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Bryant Analytics, Inc.   All Rights Reserved 1999-2001

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Hey, I thought you were out.   I hope you noted that I was watching out for
you.

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/25/2001 07:52:33 AM
To: "'PARKER, Isabel'" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com>,
"'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com>, "Gregory F. Lang
(E-mail)" <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>, "Carolyn Campbell (E-mail)"
<CCampbell@KSLAW.com>

Subject: RE: FW: Pegasus - GE Documents

I would appreciate it if you would revert to previous language.  Thanks.

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: PARKER, Isabel [mailto:isabel.parker@freshfields.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:42 AM
To: 'Kay.Mann@enron.com'; PARKER, Isabel
Cc: Kent Shoemaker (E-mail); Gregory F. Lang (E-mail); Carolyn Campbell
(E-mail)
Subject: RE: FW: Pegasus - GE Documents

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

No - I don't believe he did.  We made this change to conform with our credit
documentation.  We can revert to the previous provision if this is
problematic.
Isabel

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:41 AM
To: PARKER, Isabel
Cc: Kent Shoemaker (E-mail); Gregory F. Lang (E-mail); Carolyn Campbell
(E-mail)
Subject: Re: FW: Pegasus - GE Documents

Did Kent review the changes to (h) of the consent agreement (re
jurisdiction)?

Kay

"PARKER, Isabel" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com> on 04/25/2001 07:32:47 AM

To:   "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Kent Shoemaker (E-mail)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com>, "Gregory F.
      Lang (E-mail)" <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>, "Carolyn Campbell
      (E-mail)" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>

Subject:  FW: Pegasus - GE Documents

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email
ITHelp@freshfields.com if you need assistance.

Please see below which gives "sign off" from Kent Shoemaker on all the last
drafts of all the documents.  Kent has not, of course seen the final drafts
circulated last night but I do not believe that the changes do anything
other than conform to the credit documentation.  I apologise for sending
duplicate forms last night. I will resend all final versions shortly.
Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE) [mailto:kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 11:04 AM
To: 'PARKER, Isabel'
Subject: RE: Pegasus - GE Documents

Documents look okay.

I'm confirming two things:  (1) wiring instructions, and (2) that Dan
Rowley
has authority to opinion on GE (I had assumed this but thought I better
check - he's out of office until this evening).

I'll let you know both answers soon.

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: PARKER, Isabel [mailto:isabel.parker@freshfields.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 9:55 AM
To: Kent Shoemaker (E-mail); Kay Mann (E-mail); Carolyn Campbell
(E-mail)
Cc: Gregory F. Lang (E-mail); Rick Vicens (E-mail); John Tisdale
(E-mail); Jack Wallace (E-mail); John Anderson (E-mail); BURKE, Ted
(TDB); O'BRIEN, Lisa; VAN DUSEN, Nicholas
Subject: Pegasus - GE Documents

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email
ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

In anticipation of our closing on the morning of Wednesday 25th April,
please find attached the following:

(a) a clean and blacklined copy of the GE Consent (reflecting changes to
the
credit documentation and reflecting the acceleration of the Turbine
Progress
Payment Schedule);
(b) a clean and blacklined copy of the GE legal opinion (reflecting changes
to the credit documentation); and
(c) a clean and blacklined copy of the GE letter agreement (reflecting
changes to the credit documentation).

A form of receipt of funds will follow.

Please contact me with any questions on 212 277 4025.

Regards
Isabel


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/04/2001 07:06
PM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
02/01/2001 08:41 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: SPA- Comments

Kay:

I don't see a problem with reaching agreement on one form (Kendall LLC) and
then duplicating it for the Titan project if we transact on both.

I am expecting a call this morning from PSEG's developer to discuss site
visit(s) and the due diligence binder(s).  I believe that they are serious on
moving forward on the Kendall project.  I will determine their interest in
transacting on the Titan project.

Since we are not asking for any money down, I would like to be able to keep
marketing the sites until the transaction closes.

It is still unclear to me how the closing would go on this deal.  Would they
sign the SPA and wire the money simultaneous with our signing over the LLC
member interests or would these events occur on two different dates?  Let me
know how you see it happening.  It seems to me that we could make it all
happen at one time.

On the NRG call, I am waiting to hear back from NRG.  Based on my discussions
with them yesterday, Friday is looking like a tough day for the call (Ben is
unavailable in the afternoon and the NRG guys are travelling in the
morning).  Either it will happen Friday afternoon without you/Ben (commercial
issues only) or we will set it up for Monday.

Fred

Kay Mann@ENRON
01/31/2001 07:42 PM
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: SPA- Comments

Fred,

If we have the same purchaser for both, it would be a lot easier to agree to
the form, then duplicate it.  Do you see any problem with this? I will have
to have the electronic form emailed to me, then I can make the changes.  I
brought the hard copy, but I don't have access to the electronic form. Have
they indicated if they want to go forward with this, or are they still
kicking tires?  I need to set priorities, so it would help to know what's
most important, especially since I'm on the road.  Do we want to continue
marketing the sites during the time period between signing and termination?
I don't think 3 weeks would be a problem after signing.  No TurboPark!!!

On the issue of the conference call Friday, I have a meeting with the
customer which starts in the am, then I'm on the road.  Monday would be 1000
times better, if this is at all possible.  In that won't work, I will have
more details about timing of my Friday meeting tomorrow.

Thanks,

Kay


I spoke with Linda and she is on board with working in Texas supply orig.  That's today status anyway.

Regards,
Brian
Brian Redmond
Office: 713-853-1839
Fax: 713-646-3234


__________________________________
TECHNOLOGY ALERT
from The Wall Street Journal

Thursday, Dec. 20, 2001

A long slump battered technology companies this year, but the Internet's
role in everyday life continued to grow. See how stocks performed, check out
the key Internet metrics, and read how one neighborhood used the Net as a
lifeline after Sept. 11. Also, click around our interactive timeline and
vote for the top story of 2001.

See more at:
http://interactive.wsj.com/pages/technology2001-6.htm

Vote for the top tech story at:
http://discussions.wsj.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=wsjvoices&msg=2255

__________________________________
ADVERTISEMENT

Electronic Bill Presentment and Payment (EBPP) are
critical components of your e-business strategy.
Find out how powerful electronic EBPP/eSP capabilties
of IBM Content Manager OnDemand enable these technologies.
Content Manager onDemand is an essential component of high
customer satisfaction. Visit

http://www.ibm.com/software/info/visitor/db2/enewsletter/45

_________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION

TO REMOVE YOURSELF from this list, see:
http://interactive.wsj.com/user-cgi-bin/searchUser.pl?action=emailalert

Then uncheck the appropriate box to unsubscribe from this list.  Click on
the "save selections" button.

For further questions, please call our customer service department at
1-800-369-2834 or 1-609-514-0870 between the hours of 8 a.m. and 9 p.m
Eastern Monday-Friday or e-mail inquiries@interactive.wsj.com.

__________________________________
Copyright 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


This is why he never got it.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2000 04:42 PM -----

	GWADMIN@SULLCROM.COM
	05/16/2000 10:54 AM

		 To: Mark.Taylor@enron.com
		 cc: GWADMIN@SULLCROM.COM
		 Subject: Secure Messaging Non-Delivery Report: EnronOnline Posting Agreement

When Mark.Taylor@enron.com sent e-mail to SCMAILSUPPORT@SULLCROM.COM (10/13/1)
Sullivan & Cromwell has received spam from your domain or e-mail address in
the past. If you need to send e-mail to us
please contact PC Support at (212)558-4277.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 10:01
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
10/24/2000 10:00 AM
To: Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Room Change-Bridal Shower-Meredith

Kim, please forward to the traders.  I think the schedulers have this already.

Please forward:  Room Change


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 10:53 AM -----

	Carlos Alatorre@ENRON
	01/29/2001 10:46 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carl
Carter/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Pipelines

Mark,
Following our meeting, please find attached a very preliminary guideline for
the 3rd party Pipelines contract. Also, I am attaching a document, which
describes the charge structure. As Dave mentioned the numbers shown are not
final.
We will be working on a detailed description of the scope of services, as
soon as we have it we will send it to you.
Please let us know if you have any questions
Thanks
Carlos


Tremaine:

Since I did not hear back from you yesterday, I wanted to confirm whether,
notwithstanding the language in the signature block of the Incumbency
Certificate, affixing the corporate seal was an absolute requirement by
Citibank.  If so, could you please courier the original Incumbency
Certificate to the attention of Kathleen Carnahan, whose address is set
forth below:

Enron North America
1400 Smith, EB3146D
Houston, Texas 77002

Several of the officers named on the Incumbency Certificate are out of the
office, so it would expedite matters if you could the original was sent back
to Kathleen.  Thanks.

Regards,

Marisa

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - Reuter, Maria I. (Business E-Mail Address).vcf


I sent this to Mike Dorman at Locke Liddel for his analysis. I ased for his
answer by Thurs. Do you need it before then?

Randal Maffett
04/28/2000 04:52 PM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, rstephens@bracepatt.com,
ddaniels@bracepatt.com
cc: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Lyon Credit Breakup Fee Claims

I sent the package of info I had to Richard earlier this week.  I have not
responded to Lyon Credit and owe them such.  I'm now waiting on guidance from
y'all as to what my response should be.  Please advise ASAP as I'd like to
put this behind us.

RANDY


Notice No. 00-402
November 21, 2000
TO:    ALL NYMEX MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX CLEARING FIRMS
ALL NYMEX OPERATIONS MANAGERS
FROM:   Neal Wolkoff
     Executive Vice President
SUBJECT:     MARGIN RATE CHANGE
Effective Date:  Wednesday, November 22, 2000 (close of business)
Futures Contract: Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures
Contract Months: All Months
Rate Change:
NYMEX Division Margins on Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contracts
Effective Date: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 (close of business)
Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin):      Old:  $5,500  New:  $6,500
Member Customer (Initial Margin):        Old:  $6,050  New:  $7,150
Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin):      Old:  $7,425  New:  $8,775
Should you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact Arthur
McCoy at (212) 299-2928 or Joe Sanguedolce at (212) 299-2855.  This notice
supersedes all previous notices regarding outright margins for the NYMEX
Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contract.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(00-402)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


As I am not involved in the daily operations behind this deal, I will need your input in order to respond to this request.  As I have indicated, the frequency of cuts has caused tremedous concern and Citizens is considering walking away from this deal.  They need assurance that this gas is going to flow in order to continue.  Do we need to have a meeting?  And when can I expect a response from the desk?

Thanks,

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Breen, Sean" <SBreen@czn.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:48 AM
To:	Foster, Chris H.; Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	Griffith Sales

As I have discussed with you, Citizens is concerned about the frequency of upstream supply issues that have resulted in the recent cuts in the deliveries to the Griffith power plant.  Based on the information I have received, the reasons for these cuts have not risen to the level of Force Majeure, which as you know is the only event that would excuse performance under our contract for firm delivery of gas.  Citizens therefore requests that Enron respond to Citizens in writing with a descriptions of the steps Enron is taking to insure that there is not a continuation of these contract performance issues into the future. Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated.


Rosalee,

Steve Kean asked me to send you this documents for Mr. Lay's meeting with
Ernesto Martens, Mexico's Secretary of Energy on Sunday Feb. 11th at 5:00 p.m.

I will pick up the Secretary at the airport and bring him to the Enron
building for the meeting.

Please contact me if you need any additional information.

Best,

Ricardo


Sally,

Shari Mao contacted her boyfriend and he gave her the name of a larynx
specialist at Methodist Hospital - Dr. Donald T. Donovan (713-798-5900).  I
hope this might be helpful.

Lisa Cousino


Sue/Janelle:

Steve Kean's pitch to the Florida PSC looks like it opened a "small crack" in
the FL IOUs door.  I am trying to get Enron a slot  on the agenda.  I will
advise tomorrow.

Marchris
----- Forwarded by Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron on 05/07/2001 04:50 PM -----

	"Natalie FUTCH" <natalief@katzlaw.com>
	05/07/2001 04:39 PM

		 To: <Marchris.Robinson@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FPSC workshop on hedging and portfolio management next Monday

Marchris:

We'll give you more information as we learn it.

On Friday, May 4, the FPSC issued a notice of a workshop on hedging and
portfolio management (procurement of fuel for electric generation and end-use
applications); to be held next Monday, 5/14/01, at 1:30 p.m. at the FPSC.
F
 ind the notice at this link:

http://www.psc.state.fl.us/dockets/documents/01/05688-01.html

Find the agenda at this link (open with wordperfect viewer - let me know if
you need me to cut and paste it into an e-mail).

http://webserv1.electro-net.com/psc/Framer.Cfm?Link=rtowkshp.wpd

The purpose of this meeting is to have presentations on this issue.

Natalie

Natalie B. Futch, associate
Katz, Kutter, Haigler, Alderman, Bryant & Yon, P.A.
106 E. College Avenue, Suite 1200
Tallahassee, FL  32312
(850) 224-9634 (phone)
(850) 681-3218 (facsimile)
www.katzlaw.com
_______________________________________

This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s)
and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, attorney
work-product or attorney-client privileged.  If this information is received
by anyone other than the named addressee(s), the recipient should
immediately notify the sender by E-MAIL and by telephone (850) 224-9634 and
obtain instructions as to the disposal of the transmitted material.  In no
event shall this material be read, used, copied, reproduced, stored or
retained by anyone other than the named addressee(s), except with the
express consent of the sender or the named addressee(s).  Thank you.


Hi guys,

Just wanted to check to see if there is a "go by" affiliate EPC contract,
destined to be 97 10 compliant?  I'm ready to start working on it from ENA's
standpoint.

Thanks,

Kay


The guy in B.A. that we booked our hunt with is Emilio Paris (phone # 011 541
14 812 2154).  We hunted near a small town called Rio Tercero about  45
minutes outside of Cordoba.  We stayed at the Los Alamos Lodge.  Our guide's
name was Sergio Abrile.  We paid $750 for 3 days of hunting, 2 nights
lodging, meals, hunting license, etc.  We paid $9.00/box for shells.  We
aleady had our guns,  however they had very nice, new Beretta 12/20 ga.
shotguns for rent for $25/day.  We hunted April 30-May 2 which is the end of
fall and we slayed the birds.  I think the only time to avoid is during the
heart of winter July-August due to cold/wet conditions.  The flight from
Buenos Aires to Corboda cost about $200 and takes about an hour.

You might call Emilio just to compare prices, etc.  I think he is affiliated
with a US outfitter called Gage/4 Seasons.  I hope this info is helpful.
Don't hesitate
to call if have nay questions.

"Lee Hanse" <lhanse@br-inc.com> on 02/12/2001 06:43:00 AM
Please respond to <lhanse@br-inc.com>
To: "'bsumrall@dow.com'" <bsumrall@dow.com>, "'charles.neuberger@mirant.com'"
<charles.neuberger@mirant.com>, "'dcdegen@duke-energy.com'"
<dcdegen@duke-energy.com>, "'jhall@ccng-inc.com'" <jhall@ccng-inc.com>,
"'ronnie.sceroler@mirant.com'" <ronnie.sceroler@mirant.com>,
"'sajdakwl@bp.com'" <sajdakwl@bp.com>, "'tflowers@eex.com'"
<tflowers@eex.com>, "Gordon, Matt" <Matt_Gordon@kindermorgan.com>,
<Bruce_Boyd@kindermorgan.com>
cc: <Sneal@enron.com>, "'bshields@coral-energy.com'"
<bshields@coral-energy.com>
Subject: re: ARGENTINA DOVE HUNT

I talked to Scott Neal - he lived in BA for a few years and has attended and
hosted bird hunts.  He is going to get me the names of some people he hunted
with to compare prices, accommodations etc.  A few things he wanted us to
check on;
 1) BA is a hell of a long way to travel - is the flight bus. class?
 2) What time of year are you planning on going - there are better times.
Scott was thinking they hunted in May (he is going to check) and had as much
shooting (and then some) as he needed.
 3) Accommodations in BA and where you hunt.  Again he is going to verify and
get some phone numbers but you want to stay close to where you are hunting
(not like Mexico) and there are some very nice places - he is thinking he
stayed at the Gauge Four Seasons.
I will get back to you with more details as I have them.
Thanks, Lee - 713-624-9065 (lhanse@br-inc.com)
---------- Original Text ----------

From: "Boyd, Bruce" <Bruce_Boyd@kindermorgan.com>, on 2/11/2001 11:11 AM:

Are you up for a hunting trip of a lifetime?

Pawpaw and I met with an outfitter last week to discuss details of a dove
hunting trip in Argentina. In a nutshell, the trip includes six (6) shoots
(i.e. half day hunts) near the town of Cordoba, Argentina. As Jody can
attest, there is no limit and you can shoot 400 to 1000 birds per day
depending on how mad you are at them!

I have estimated the total cost of the trip at $5,000. This price includes
the following:

3 nights & 4 days (6 shoots) @ $2,295 (at Presidential Estancia)
Roundtrip airfare (Houston-Miami-Buenos Aires-Cordoba) @ $1,000 (could be as
low as $800)
Shells ($9.75 per box) @ $1,000 (based on 320 birds per shoot...75% kill
average)
Gun permits, bird boys, entertainment in Buenos Aires, etc. @ $705

We need at least 4 to book a separate trip. Argentina's seasons are opposite
from ours and the best time to go is August - October. A smaller group will
be booked to go with an other group.

I know all of you boys got huge 2000 bonuses...so what's a paltry $5 large
for a trip like this?

Let me know if you are interested in going with us so we can start looking
at dates. If you have any questions call Pawpaw or myself. See ya.


Start Date: 4/18/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041804.txt


Attached, please find a mocked up version of SBX2 27 (Bowen), regarding
direct access, as it is proposed to be amended in the Senate
Appropriations Committee today. A new element to this bill would require
ESPs to pay a reinstatement fee to DWR if they return customers to an
IOU.

 - SB 27xx - mockup.doc


The following development websites supported by Gas Fundamentals will be changing to the url's listed below.
Notably, the CORP has been replaced with NETCO.  Please ensure any applications/links are corrected
to reflect the new change.  No current ETA on when this change will be applied to our production sites.

http://enaresearch.dev.netco.enron.com
http://fundamentals.dev.netco.enron.com
http://sitetrack-fundamentals.dev.netco.enron.com
http://plasma-fundamentals.dev.netco.enron.com
http://commoditywebs.dev.netco.enron.com
http://itfundy.dev.netco.enron.com

Dave Dronet


1. Legislative Update - What is Enron's message on 6x and 33x?
2. Gov Davis Statement on Direct Access - Sue Mara
3. Cal PX Chargeback Settlement Discussions - Any News?
4. SDG&E Surcharge Update
5. Other


I think it is both Rappaport and his target audience.  I think Dan needs to
hear directly from us that we are not happy with the position he has taken re
electronic trading.  Silence by us could be misinterpreted by him.  Let me
know what you think.

Mark

	Louise Kitchen
	09/25/2000 11:12 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: EnronOnline- Reuters

Do you really this the right avenue would be directly to Rappaport - isn't it
his target audience?

Do we need to do this - do you think the other exchanges will do something?

From: Mark E Haedicke on 22/09/2000 18:43
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: EnronOnline- Reuters

Rappaport's comments are potentially very negative to us.  I think we should
write him a letter in protest.    Mark


Want a NEW high speed computer?

866 MHz Pentium III Processor FAST enough?

Want High Speed internet?
Broadband,
Cable Modem,
DSL,
Satellite.

Then Get READY...
All Eligible U.S. Employees get innovative at HOME beginning March, 2001.

Go to http://clickathome.enron.com to LEARN more about the offerings.

Non-U.S. Eligible Employees get innovative at home beginning late 2001 and
2002.


Don, the duck hunting went great.  We bagged over 30 ducks (between 6 guys).  They were a combination of pintail, teal, buffalo head, and blue bills.

The guides provide the dog, decoys, blinds, transportation, and they call them in for you.  They will let you call if you want, but the guides are top notch.

My uncle and I are thinking of going down this weekend or the next.  Let me know if you are interested, and we will reserve you a spot with us.

Lyle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baughman Jr., Don
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 2:28 PM
To:	Larkworthy, Lyle
Subject:	RE: Great Duck Hunting

Lyle,

Thanks for the note.  How did the hunt go?  Did you have to bring decoys?  How did the guides do callin' in the ducks?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks,

Don Baughman
Commercial Manager
Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
800-349-5527

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Larkworthy, Lyle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 2:09 PM
To:	Baughman Jr., Don
Subject:	Great Duck Hunting

Don, it was great talking to you about hunting and shooting today.  Below is the link to Central Flyway Outfitters (CFO).  They are a top notch guide service out of Winnie, Texas (near Beaumont) that specialize in duck and goose hunting.  They have hunting packages around $150 a gun (they offer corporate discounts as well).  All you need is a license, shells, gun, and waders:  they will take care of the transportation (4 wheelers), guide, and dog.

I am heading down there tomorrow for a hunt with my uncle.  I will let you know how we do.  If you are interested I can arrange hunt on a future Saturday or Sunday morning.  Regards, Lyle

http://www.centralflywayoutfitters.com/

Lyle Larkworthy
Enron Broadband Services
Project Manager
713-345-4557 office
877-628-7054 skytel pager
713-301-6296 cell


- 1_25_02GO.xls
 - 1_25_02OH.xls


Jay,

We have been short listed on an rfp for Noresco, a power plant developer.  Attached are the financial statement for the parent who is willing to guarantee the project.  They plan to refresh prices and perhaps transact this week.  they have received contracts from other potential suppliers already.  I got the RFP late and therefore, I am running behind.  I am attaching my proposal in case you need it.  It will basically be a full requirements transaction out of our Socal Pool for up to 20 years.

CAN WE MAKE THIS OUR NUMBER 1 PRIORITY AND GET CONTRACTS TO THEM TODAY??  PLEASE?  I WILL SUPPLY BEVERAGES LATER IN THE WEEK OR PERHAPS A TICKET TO ASTROS TONIGHT (if I can find them!)

Please call and let me know if we can make this hurdle!

thanks,

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Phil Glaessner <pglaessner@enermetrix.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Phil+20Glaessner+20+3Cpglaessner+40enermetrix+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 11:42 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Cc:	'aguiar@usourceonline.com'; 'morin@usourceonline.com'
Subject:	ERI financials

Kim:
     Attached are ERI Investments Inc's financials.  Noresco will be the signatory to the contracts and ERI Investments Inc will guarantee the transaction.  Please send copies of Enron's contracts and Form of Guarantee to Tony Aguiar at aguiar@usourceonline.com and myself.  Thank you.
                                                                                Phil Glaessner
                                                                                713-344-2301
-----Original Message-----
From: jrizzo@noresco.com [mailto:jrizzo@noresco.com ]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:58 AM
To: pglaessner@enermetrix.com
Cc: aguiar@usourceonline.com
Subject: FW: eri financials
Here is the info you needed.
JJR
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:         Murphy, Kerri
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:48 AM
> To:   Rizzo, John; Mannherz, David
> Subject:      eri financials
>
>
>  <<eri_fin_dec99&00.pdf>>  <<s&p_ltr.pdf>>
> Kerri Murphy
> Administrative Manager
> NORESCO
> One Research Drive
> Suite 400 C
> Westborough, MA 01581
> 508-614-1011 phone
> 508-870-9707 fax
>

 - eri_fin_dec99&00.pdf
 - s&p_ltr.pdf


Uhhhh - You Bet.  Maybe they will send me home with cooked fish!!

"Germany, Mary/COR" <mgermany@CH2M.com> on 05/01/2001 02:29:53 PM
To:	"'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	RE: Friday

So does that mean that you are cooking fish for me??? ;)

Mary Germany, Manager
Accounts Payable
Payroll
Accounting Support
(303) 713-2151
fax (303) 846-2151
email - mgermany@ch2m.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: May 01, 2001 1:05 PM
To: Germany, Mary/COR
Subject: Re: Friday

Pager number 877-498-5497
Cell number   713-557-1572

I will be in Port Aranasas Friday morning.  I should be back in Houston by
2:00 PM and I will have my cell phone turned on for the trip home.  I don't
have voicemail on my cell phone.  But, if anything should happen, you could
leave me a voicemail at home and I will check it once every hour after 1:00
PM on Friday.

Places to Eat North of 1960
Landry's Seafood House (yuk)
Tortuga's (mexican not as good as Guadalajara)
Guadalajara - good mexican food
Olive Garden
Carrabba's
Macaroni Grill
TGI Friday's
Chili's

Any misspellings were done on purpose.  I will be coming back Friday with
lots of fish!!!!!!!!

"Germany, Mary/COR" <mgermany@CH2M.com> on 05/01/2001 01:23:07 PM

To:   "'chris.germany@enron.com'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Friday

Before I forget here  is my cell phone number 303-667-3495.  I hope it
works there.  Do you  still have one?  I will pick up my luggage and be at
the passenger  pick-up.  If you have a cell phone I can call you whether it
is my cell  phone or from a pay phone.

See you  Friday!

Mary Germany,  Manager
Accounts Payable
Payroll
Accounting Support
(303) 713-2151
fax (303) 846-2151
email - mgermany@ch2m.com


Thanks for the update.  Congratulations on your progress.

Keith Miceli@ENRON
07/24/2000 04:18 PM
To: Steven J Kean@EES, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen.Denne@enron.com
cc: Karen.Denne@enron.com
Subject: Re: Chorety Crisis

Steve and Mark:

I arrived in the US on Saturday with a good feeling about what appears to be
a successful resolution of the Chorety crisis.  Under Steve Hopper's
leadership, the Chorety spill became a non-issue by Friday.  During the
crisis, I collaborated with my counterpart from Shell/London, Michael
Megarry, in developing a Key Messages and Internal Q&As document (attached).
At the daily meeting/conference call, there was an Operations Report from the
site, an analysis of the day's newspaper articles (which I handled), and
discussions on how to respond to media that were reporting or airing
inaccurate information that was damaging Transredes' image.

I also developed a Stakeholders Action Plan (attached) for the Incident
Commander to use in organizing and monitoring team member actions taken in
response to stakeholder concerns.  The Plan was updated daily by the
Transredes PR Office and given to team members prior to every
meeting/conference call.   The Stakeholder Report is intended to complement
the Operations Report.

I also want to acknowledge the support of Karen and Dennis during the early
stages of the crisis.  It was extremely helpful.

Regards, Keith


We are there!! Who else is going?

--
================================================
Matt Hsu
Interwoven
Technical Account Manager, Northwest Region

503.515.7110 cell
360.258.0616 desk
360.258.0615 fax
matt.hsu@interwoven.com

Moving Business to the web.
Visit http://www.interwoven.com
================================================

"Leslie, Marc" wrote:

> Beavers make plans to invade Arizona
>      Associated Press
>
>      TEMPE, Ariz. -- Oregon State capped its remarkable emergence from more
> than a
>      quarter-century of football ineptitude by accepting an invitation to
> play Notre Dame in the Jan. 1
>      Fiesta Bowl.
>
>      The Beavers were the top choice of the Fiesta Bowl selection committee
> because they were "a
>      conference co-champion, a 10-win team and an incredible turnaround
> story that somewhat mirrors
>      what Kansas State has done," Fiesta Bowl president John Junker said.
>
>      "For us to come here from where we were three years go, to go 10-1, and
> being in the Fiesta
>      Bowl against Notre Dame is a great story," Oregon State coach Dennis
> Erickson said Sunday.
>
>      As Oregon State's opponent, Virginia Tech had a higher ranking and
> better record, but the Fiesta
>      could not resist the Irish (9-2) and their huge nationwide following,
> even though Notre Dame was
>      ranked only 11th in the final Bowl Championship Series standings.
> Oregon State is sixth.
>
>      It will be a matchup of teams that weren't even in the top 25 in the
> preseason.
>
>      "I don't think any of us in our wildest imagination would have thought
> this would have been the
>      matchup," Junker said.
>
>      Notre Dame won its last seven games to become bowl eligible at 9-2.
>
>      The Fiesta considered Miami but decided the Notre Dame-Oregon State
> matchup was more
>      intriguing, and that the Hurricanes were a better fit against Florida
> in the Sugar Bowl.
>
>      Fiesta Bowl officials maintained that comments last week by Pac-10
> commissioner Tom Hansen
>      had no impact on their decision. He suggested the conference should
> pull out of the BCS if
>      Oregon State was left out of the Fiesta Bowl.
>
>      "We selected Oregon State because they deserved it and won it on the
> field of battle," Junker
>      said.
>
>      The Fiesta Bowl normally gives an automatic berth to the Big 12
> champion, but it had two at-large
>      picks this year because Oklahoma will play Florida State for the
> national championship in the
>      Orange Bowl.
>
>      Oregon State set an NCAA record for futility with 28 consecutive losing
> seasons, a streak broken
>      when the Beavers went 6-5 last year in Erickson's first season and lost
> to Hawaii in the Oahu
>      Bowl.
>
>      This year, Oregon State tied Washington and Oregon for the Pac-10
> title, their first since 1964.
>      That team, coached by Tommy Prothro, lost to Michigan in the Rose Bowl.
> A 35-year bowl
>      drought followed.
>
>      Notre Dame, by contrast, is a regular at major bowls. Its last
> appearance in one of the big-four
>      bowls was in 1996, the Orange Bowl. But this Irish team was not
> expected to get this far,
>      especially after a 2-2 start. There was widespread speculation then
> that coach Bob Davie would
>      be out of a job when the season ended.
>
>      Davie did not want to talk about vindication.
>
>      "I think so much attention is always placed on the head coach, and I'm
> sure Dennis would agree
>      with me. This isn't about us. This is about our football players and
> our assistant coaches who put
>      so much into this.
>
>      "That was a little bit overrated before the season and it's a little
> bit overrated now. This certainly
>      isn't about me."
>
>      Each team will receive $12 million to $13 million. Oregon State will
> split the money with the rest
>      of the Pac-10, but Notre Dame, as an independent, keeps it all. No
> wonder Davie was so anxious
>      as he watched the Oklahoma-Kansas State game, knowing that a K-State
> victory could have sent
>      Notre Dame to a much lesser holiday payday.
>
>      "It was brutal," he said. "As good as Oklahoma is, and as well coached
> as they are, I almost
>      went crazy when it was fourth-and-1 and they were in that shotgun for
> that draw, but they know
>      what they're doing. It was painful watching that game."
>
>      Junker said Oregon State officials have promised 30,000 or more fans
> will come to the desert from
>      the Northwest for the game. Add to that Notre Dame's unparalleled
> national following, and the
>      Fiesta already has been declared a sellout. Each school will receive
> 15,000 tickets.
>
>      Beaver players like the idea of playing Notre Dame.
>
>      "I didn't like them growing up," running back Ken Simonton said. "I
> don't like 'America's teams.' I
>      don't like everybody's favorite. I was always an underdog."
>
> Marc
> *(303)401-7054
> *mleslie@amgen.com


Stinson,

Scot Josey will call you Thu with a request for help.
3-0321

Vince


eThink stuff!  Get your red hot eThink stuff!  You know you want to be one of
the cool kids; go to the Enron Signature Shop and order your eThink stuff
today.  Shirts, gadgets, hats and more.  We've even got gel mouse pads.
Don't know what those are?  Go find out!  Get your eThink stuff!

Tuesday, January 30 at 10:00 am Houston time, join Carrie Robert on eSpeak.
Carrie is the manager of experienceEnron, a powerful customer briefing
program.  Carrie will be available to answer your questions about the program
in an "open-mike" forum.

We've added more tips and techniques to help you do your job!  Learn about
postmortems and metaphors in Good Sense at the ThinkBank.

Call for quotes!  How would you like to be featured on the front page of the
ThinkBank or eMeet?  As you may have noticed, we put a new quote on the cover
of the ThinkBank and eMeet each month.  We've been sticking to the classics
so far, but we've decided to look in our own backyard for quotes in 2001.
Send an original quote to ethink@enron.com and you could be famous!

ethink.enron.com


i think i might be going to this gas conference on aug 7th.  that is a
monday.  if that is the case, i will try to fly into town either fri night or
saturday so i can have more time there.  i will let you know more monday.


I am sending the agreement back so that you can confirm that I made all of
the changes that you needed me to make.  Please, let me know if I need to
make any other changes.

William L. Nealy

713-345-7152