Your SAP ID and Password will be communicated to you on June 22.  This
ID/Password combination will enable you to . . .

access eHRonline to modify your personal information, view your pay advice,
access your individual time sheet, and view your benefit elections.
enter financial, procurement, project management, and/or human resources
information based on the system security you have been assigned.

Current SAP users receiving this e-mail will be receiving a new ID to replace
their current one as part of the 7-1-00 implementation -- the new ID will be
a "P#" (Personnel Number) generated from SAP HR.

If you have questions or comments, please call the COE SAP Hotline at
713-345-4SAP (4727) or visit our web site at http://sap.enron.com/coe.

Thank you.


I got a voicemail response from Jeff - he is fine with me substituting for
him on the Japan trip.


Greg,
     It was great to meet you in Houston.  Beth Gordon and I appreciated
the time you gave us and found the discussion really worthwhile.
Obviously, I hope you two can work out some cooperation.   Hope to see
again either in DC or Houston; at IFC, we certainly will pursue you guys on
the weather side.
All the best for the holidays.
Nina


i think we're getting 2 meetings confused (my fault).  mike, would you set up a PG&E/SCE coordination meeting (my assistant is sick today)?  anytime except 2-3 or 4-5 is good for me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tribolet, Michael
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 10:43 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Williams, Robert C.
Cc:	Sanders, Richard B.; Mellencamp, Lisa; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: SCE Stipulation

Can do, where?.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 10:21 AM
To:	Williams, Robert C.
Cc:	Sanders, Richard B.; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: SCE Stipulation

How about 2:30 CST?  Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Robert C.
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 10:00 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Sanders, Richard B.; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: SCE Stipulation

i think we've sent a markup to SCE.  i am available today and agree it would be a good idea to meet.  BTW are you available for a call today at 2 CST to discuss strategy for the mon meet and confer with SCE?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 9:38 AM
To:	Williams, Robert C.
Cc:	Sanders, Richard B.; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	SCE Stipulation

Bob --

Where do we stand on the SCE stipulation?  I want to make sure that our push in SCE doesn't conflict or contradict something we are doing in the PG&E discussions.

Can we meet today?

Jim


Attached is a copy of the agenda for Thursday's meeting.  In preparation for
the meeting, please think about and be prepared to discuss what "valuation"
means to you in the systems you support or the job you do.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 5-9353.

Thanks.
Chris


Minor edits as shown.  Otherwise, looks good.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/02/2001 04:20 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Advisory group bullets


Bad development.  We are trying to get Steve an appointment with Smith next
Tuesday.
----- Forwarded by Linda Robertson/NA/Enron on 03/15/2001 03:51 PM -----

	Allison Navin
	03/15/2001 03:46 PM

		 To: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Senators Dianne Feinstein and Gordon Smith Announce Partnership in
Response to the Western Energy Crisis

Senators Dianne Feinstein and Gordon Smith
Announce Partnership in Response to the Western Energy Crisis
March 15, 2001
Washington, DC - Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Gordon Smith (R-OR)
today announced an agreement to introduce bipartisan legislation to restore
stability and reliability to the Western energy market by directing the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to impose a temporary &just and
reasonable8 wholesale rate cap or cost-of-service based rates.
The legislation will also require the states involved in this effort to pass
on the cost of the electricity to retail customers. However, the states would
be able to determine how and when this would be done. In other words,
California could choose to use tiered-pricing, real-time pricing or set a
baseline rate above which prices would be passed through.
&We now have a piece of legislation that can fix the broken electricity
market and provide a period of reliability and stability in wholesale energy
costs,8 Senator Feinstein said.
&FERC has found the wholesale prices being charged in California to be unjust
and unreasonable. This legislation essentially will mandate that once FERC
makes such a finding, the agency will carry out its regulatory role. This is
a $175 million a year agency. It is there to regulate the energy marketplace,
and it should. What the Federal government can do is to provide a period of
reliability and stability at a time of crisis. Unfortunately FERC has refused
to do so.8
&California,s broken electricity market is a result of a flawed 1996
California law that deregulated wholesale costs, but left in place caps on
retail prices. This was coupled with a requirement that the utilities divest
themselves of their generating capacity and buy most of their electricity on
the spot market, where prices have escalated dramatically. In hindsight all
of this came together in a catastrophic scenario, so that today, California
buys electricity at astronomical prices. We believe that FERC needs to act to
help restore reasonable costs and stability to this marketplace.8
&Additionally, this agreement addresses the escalation of natural gas
transportation costs. Last February, FERC began a two-year experiment to lift
the cap on these costs and since that time we have seen the price of natural
gas climb 400 percent higher in Southern California.8 Senator Feinstein
added.
Specifically, the compromise legislation would accomplish the following goals:
Directs FERC to impose a just and reasonable wholesale rate cap, which can be
load-differentiated based on supply and demand, or cost-of-service-based
rates in the Western energy market (Western Systems Coordinating Council,
including Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico,
Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.)
Addresses the issue of high natural gas transmission costs by reimposing FERC
tariffs for natural gas transportation into California (FERC Order 637) and
requiring natural gas sellers to declare separately the transportation and
commodity components of the bundled rate for gray market transactions.
Stipulates that the wholesale price cap or cost-of-service based rate will
not apply to wholesale sales for delivery in a state that imposes a price
limit on the sale of electric energy at retail that: precludes a regulated
utility from recovering costs under the price cap or on a cost-of service
based rate; or precludes a regulated utility from paying its bills.
Establishes that the rate-making body of a state can determine how and when
the wholesale rates will be passed on to ratepayers, including the setting of
tiered pricing, real time pricing, and baseline rates. (With respect to the
Bonneville Power Administration, BPA will be encouraged to seek to reduce
rate spikes to economically distressed communities, while ensuring costs are
recovered by the end of the next contract period in 2006.)
Directs that after the date of enactment, utilities cannot be ordered to sell
electricity or natural gas into a state without a determination by the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that the seller will be paid.
Directs that in the event that a state in the Western energy market does not
meet the criteria described in this agreement, state public utilities
commissions in the Western energy market can ensure that regulated utilities
within their jurisdiction meet demand for electric energy in the utility,s
service area before making sales into any such state.
Establishes that the wholesale rate cap or cost-of-service based rates shall
remain in effect until such time as the market for electric energy in the
western energy market reflects just and reasonable rates, as determined by
the Commission or until March 1, 2003, whichever is earlier.


In the same Decision that the CPUC is considering voting out on suspending
Direct Access, the CPUC is considering a SoCal Edison recommendation to
suspend further payment of the Negative CTC to marketers.

The Decision would find that the earlier Stipulation does not require SCE to
make a cash payment in lieu of a bill credit (even though SCE has already
paid cash in previous periods for the Negative CTC).
The Decision orders SCE to not make cash payments to satisfy the Negative CTC
credit.
The Decision is unclear as to whether or not this is simply a suspension of
payment or would be permanent.
The Decision would apply the same findings and rulings to PG&E and SDG&E.

The key issue is that rather than having a cash receivable, EES would now
have a bill credit receivable.  In addition, because EES re-sourced its
customers, the Utility account that holds the bill credit is EES, not the
customer account.  The only method to obtain the economic value of the bill
credit is to utilize the Utilities' services.  Even if EES physically serves
the customers going forward, it may not be the same account that has the bill
credit.

The outcome of this case would impact our current Complaint, but it is
unclear exactly how the CPUC would apply this Decision to that case.

We are intending to (a) try to remove this issue from the CPUC Decision, (b)
trying to clarify the suspension is not meant as a vehicle to deny us
payment, and (c) trying to determine that the Utilities' tariff would allow
us to be paid if our account became "inactive".

One other option to consider (at least for SCE) would be to contact SCE
management to work out a bill credit application process to allow EES to
route the economic value to our DA customers.

If anyone has any questions, please call me to discuss.

Jim


T.J.

Thanks for the picture.  I'm glad you guys like the gift.  Luke looks just
like Rena, huh?

As far as Ricigs goes, I don't have his phone # or address.  I think Moller
does though.
Let me know  if you need his #.  Take care and tell Rena and Luke we said hi.

Kevin


---------------------- Forwarded by Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2000
01:46 PM ---------------------------

	Angela Henn
	02/09/2000 01:45 PM

To: Leslie.Bolton2@Solvay.com, brandy.castro@foodmaker.com, TX06@NCUA.GOV,
tifmar143@aol.com, MnLRiz@aol.com, ambox@hti.net, sbrown@metroplex-inc.com,
lara_724@yahoo.com, Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: A WOMANS PRAYER

Subject: A WOMANS PRAYER

Dear Lord...

So far today, I am doing all right.
I have not gossiped, lost my temper,
been greedy, grumpy, nasty, selfish, or self indulgent.
I have not whined, bitched, cursed, or eaten any chocolate.
I have not charged on my credit card.

However, I am going to get out of bed in a few minutes,
and I will need a lot more help after that.

Amen.


We had to fax it to the UK for execution.  Tana Jones will follow up with you
re the status.

Tana:

Please follow up with Steve re when he should expect an execution copy.

Leslie

	"Steven Wagner" <swagner@erisks.com>
	12/07/2000 02:58 PM

		 To: <Leslie.Hansen@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Reciprocal Confidentiality Agreement

I have not received the faxed execution copy, have you sent it?

SPW

-----Original Message-----
From: Leslie.Hansen@enron.com [mailto:Leslie.Hansen@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 10:05 AM
To: Steven Wagner
Subject: RE: Reciprocal Confidentiality Agreement

Please confirm that your fax number is 212-819-0171.  (The phone number I
had for you was wrong, so I don't want to rely on this fax number either.)

Leslie

                    "Steven
                    Wagner"              To:     <Leslie.Hansen@enron.com>
                    <swagner@eris        cc:
                    ks.com>              Subject:     RE: Reciprocal
Confidentiality Agreement

                    12/07/2000
                    08:58 AM

Send the execution copy to me.  Faxed signature pages are fine.

SPW

-----Original Message-----
From: Leslie.Hansen@enron.com [mailto:Leslie.Hansen@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 9:53 AM
To: Steven Wagner
Cc: Craig.Chaney@enron.com; David.P.Dupre@enron.com
Subject: Re: Reciprocal Confidentiality Agreement

Steve:

All of your proposed changes are acceptable.  I'm finalizing the document
as per the attached and will have it sent to you for execution after I have
had it executed on my end.  To whom should I send the execution document?
In the interests of time, I suggest that we exchange fax copies.

Regards,

Leslie Hansen
713/853-6121

                    "Steven
                    Wagner"              To:     <leslie.hansen@enron.com>
                    <swagner@eris        cc:
                    ks.com>              Subject:     Reciprocal
Confidentiality Agreement

                    12/06/2000
                    04:41 PM

(See attached file: NDAEnronCredit.doc)


Carol,  I am interested in joining in on a group gift.  Let me know what you
need.


Start Date: 1/7/02; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010722.txt


- got_coke.jpg


Dave Steiner has made arrangements for Outlook training for the Portland office this week.  The morning sessions are three hours long and are useful for those who need to have a thorough knowledge of Outlook, for example travelers who use laptops may want to attend as well as the administrative staff.  The afternoon sessions will provide an overview of Outlook and instructors will be on hand to answer questions. Each session will accommodate 15 students and the training is on a first-come, first-serve basis.  The schedule is listed below.

Wednesday, May 9 - Mt. Hood Conference Room
8:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m.
1:00 p.m. -  2:30 p.m.
3:30 p.m. -  5:00 p.m.

Thursday, May 10 - Mt. Hood Conference Room
8:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m.
1:00 p.m. -  2:30 p.m.
3:30 p.m. -  5:00 p.m.

Friday, May 11 - Mt. Hood Conference Room
8:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m.
1:00 p.m. -  2:30 p.m.
3:30 p.m. -  5:00 p.m.

Please let me know if you have any questions.


John,

I have scheduled a meeting with you Monday at 1:00pm to discuss our TECO
deal.  It seems as if we're getting traction around a structure and the
efforts are focusing on how to maximize our leverage during distress
periods...your expertise.  The attached materials will help frame the
discussion.  Meeting attendees will be you, me, Lou Stoler (legal) and Billy
Lemmons (CTG).

The rest of you are getting the same materials for your reference.

regards,

Don Black


The status of the 12/31 DPR is as follows:

North America Gas:  P&L and Bench  preliminary, final will be received soon.
North America Power East: Final information received
North America Power West: Final information received
North America Power Canada: Final information received
EES Gas and Power: Information currently not available
South America Gas and Power: Final information received
Enron Europe:  Attempting to coordinate with Europe about reporting only ECTRIC piece.
Global Products: Status unknown
Weather: Final should be available next week
Coal: Final should be available 1/17
Freight: Status unknown
Emissions: Status unknown
Global Risk Markets: Final information received
Equity, Convertible Arb, Foreign Currency: no positions to report on
Interest Rate: Data not available
Paper, Lumber and Steel: Final information received
Broadband, Advertising and DRAM: Final expected next week
PGE: Final information received
ETS: Status unknown
Merchant Portfolio: Final information received
Capital Portfolio: Status unknown

I am still trying to find out whether we will receive information from several groups.  I will keep you updated on the progress.

Chris Abel

-----Original Message-----

From: Wilson, Shona

Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:34 AM

To: Thapar, Raj; Beck, Sally; Pearce, Barry; Apollo, Beth

Cc: Abel, Chris; Considine, Keith; Ayala, Susie; Trevino, Susan

Subject: priorities for 1/16 and accomplishments for 1/15

1/15 -

curve val: we have scoped the curve val project and have discussed it with PwC. I've talked to E&Y in general terms and have a meeting with them on this at 10 today. We have also had initial discussions with the different risk groups about the holes in the curve construction & upload process and our deliverable for the end of today is a list of where the holes are and a plan to fill those holes.

We spent significant time with E&Y to go over the make up of the DPR.

We are working with the different groups on the 12/31 DPR information. So far, we have only had one request for it. My gut feeling is that EIM & ENA are complete, but ECTRIC & EGM need a bit more time. Chris should have a complete status ready for today.

Our systems are fixed (hooray!). Yesterday we caught up on the Enovate and Bridgeline DPRs as well as spent significant time with IT to get the systems fixed.

Susie is still working on the SEC VAR for 10/31, 11/30, and will start 12/31 as soon as all of the information is available. She has also started the net assets work.

Lastly, the whole group had CAS training so once we get access to the system we can start pulling info by counterparty.

Today our goals are:

Curve val - finalize memo (getting agreement from PwC, E&Y, and Enron estate), put listing of curve construction plan fwd, start determining what the different buckets of curves are and what tools are available to perform analysis

Field more E&Y DPR qus

Have a complete status report on the 12/31 DPR.

Prepare ongoing reporting (Enovate, Bridgeline etc).

I also hope to get some time to familarize myself with the CAS environment.

Regards

Chris Abel
Manager, Risk Controls
Global Risk Operations
chris.abel@enron.com <mailto:chris.abel@enron.com>
713.853.3102


This message is from David Mitchell.

Please see the attached.

(See attached file: CFTC Proposed Regulatory Framework Memo.doc)
 - CFTC Proposed Regulatory Framework Memo.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001
10:10 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           02/23/2001 05:27 PM

To: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Schedule C

Chris,
We are taking $100M to Schedule C tonight.  I don't know when it may be
released.

DG


Attached are blacklined and clean copies of the Legal Status Report for Enron
Canada as at May 11, 2001:

Regards,
Peter


Attached is a new letter for the July 17 payment which ECT owes Sonoco.
Please review for accuracy.  If it's OK, one of us can fax (with the
settlement statement) on the payment date.  Thanks.  Sara


probably not.  i think you should understand my situation.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:26 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

how convenient.  actually, i don't really have any money either, maybe we
should just call it even.  what do you think?

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:16 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

yeah.  i had it picked out and everything.  i had to call the dealer and
tell him i am not going to suprise you with it.  we can still go to dinner
tomorrow night though.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:33 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   that's too bad.  so, does that mean i'm not getting my bmw from you
   anymore?

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:33 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   our stock is taking a bath.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:20 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

       i was just about to email you.  why is it worthless?

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:14 PM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      my 401k is now worthless.  i have no money.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:28 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         how was portland

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:49 PM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         great.  good to hear.  i got back last night.

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
            Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:15 PM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            yeah, it was horrible, i didn't think i was going to be able to
      make
         it.
            when did you get back.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
            Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:54 AM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject:

            did you miss me while i was gone?

   **********************************************************************
            This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
         affiliate
            and
            may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
   use
      of
         the
            intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
      disclosure
         by
            others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
      recipient
         (or
            authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
      sender
         or
            reply
            to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
      delete
            all
            copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
      are
         not
            intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
         evidence
            a
            binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
      its
            affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and
   may
         not
            be
            relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
         otherwise.
            Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


The 22nd of Oct is fine with me....  I'll make sure it's fine with Paul, and we will plan out the day between and amongst us...  Look forward to meeting you...
Juan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	devanoski@nyiso.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-devanoski+40nyiso+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 8:14 AM
To:	Padron, Juan
Cc:	FFrancis@nyiso.com
Subject:	Re: Info for Juan Padron - Enron Energy Services

Juan,

Thanks for your contact information.

Virtual bidding is separate from bidding and scheduling physical energy.
Your virtual bid is not required to be tied to a generator or physical
transaction. The limit to your virtual bid is the amount of credit
established for the purpose of virtual bids.

Additionally, I would like to arrange some time to come and visit you in
Houston. We are hoping for 2 or 3 hours on Monday, Oct 22. I'll be making
the trip with Frank Francis, who is the NYISO customer rep for Enron Power
Marketing. We have already contacted Paul Thomas at Power Marketing, who
may be contacting you about this trip. Perhaps it will be practical to meet
with both Energy Service and Power Marketing at the same. Frank and I will
plan to have the entire day available to meet with you and Power Marketing.
If you prefer to conduct the meetings separately that is also perfectly
acceptable to us.

Thanks,
Dave Evanoski
518-356-6031

                    "Padron, Juan"
                    <Juan.Padron@E       To:     <devanoski@nyiso.com>
                    NRON.com>            cc:
                                         Subject:     Info for Juan Padron - Enron Energy Services
                    09/18/2001
                    09:41 AM

Full Name:           Juan Pablo Padron
Title:                    Trading Analyst
Direct Phone:        713-853-1751
Direct Fax:          713-646-3284
email:                    juan.padron@enron.com
Mailing Add:         1400 Smith St
                     Houston TX 77002
                     Suite EB 0690

Dave,

one more question I forgot to throw at you during our conversation......
is "Virtual Bidding" going to take the place of the bidding (or
scheduling) process in place today.... or is it going to be a second
mean of bidding...?

I appreciate your help.  Look forward to working with you.

Juan

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Mustafa

I finally found Nav.

nrahemtulla@thecampus.com

I am moving to Houston to trade power in the Northeastern US.

Gotta hop,

Chris


Yes, it is a GTC Spot

Daren J Farmer
03/10/2000 01:54 PM
To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 98-6719 and 98-9676

Julie,

Is the contract with Cokinos on deal 151669 valid for Feb and Mar 20000?

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 03/10/2000
01:52 PM ---------------------------

Jackie Young
03/10/2000 10:39 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 98-6719 and 98-9676

Hi Daren,

Can you please check into whether or not the below deals for the above meters
can be rolled and extended?  If so, can you please perform this for me so
that Anita can set up an accounting arrangement for me?

98-6719  Sitara Deal #166989 Flow @ meter began on February 10th but the deal
is not effective until  February the 11th.
     No new deal # referenced and no evergreen flag.  This is on the
gathering (96026573) K which is the only
     K @ the meter.

98-9676  Sitara Deal #151669 Deal good from 1/1/00 - 1/31/00 but there is
flow for all of February 2000 with no K.  This is on the 215K      for 1/2000
production which is the only K @ the meter.

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


Paul,

I have a trader that is trying to trade financially with Total International
Ltd., but we have asked that he not until we can sort our some eligibility
issues.  Prior to speaking with Ben Hamida at Total last week, we had never
approached them for financial statements or a guaranty that would establish
them as elibible contract parties.  I noticed that we have significant
financial trading with them in London.  How have you established eligibilty?
My trader is asking, since he cannot trade under ENA with Total, if he can
sleave deals through London.

Any ideas or insight would be helpful.

thanks
brant


John,

Very interesting, I would make a point that the generation demand
is highly volatile  and driven to a large extent by weather. Also,
the changes in the structure of gas demand
require development of different types of storage (more peaking storage).

Vince

"John H Herbert" <jhh1@email.msn.com> on 06/29/2000 09:22:19 AM
To: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince_J_Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Storage story

See my storage story that begins on 1. Plus you might find the issue to be
of interest. I will be doing little occasionally fee pieces for the
Transportation &
Storage Report and will be having lunch with them tomorrow so any thoughts
you have on my piece or the report would be appreciated.

Best regards,

JHHerbert

 - ts06-29.pdf


PNM is incorrect.  The price is $4.86.

Tell them that this deal is for west texas pool gas and that we never sell
west texas pool gas based on a san juan gas daily.


Can you please get a copy of their Expansion filing in time for our visit this Friday?


PLEASE NOTE:  This email includes several items.
(1)  the call in information for Friday's conference call;
(2)  a summary of yesterday's conference call (from Jeff Dasovich, Enron);
(3)  two documents that list the contact information we have received to date
(please email Steve Kean @ skean.enron.com if any changes/additions need to
be made to the list).  As we receive more contact information, revised lists
will be emailed to everyone.
______________________________________________________________________________
_________

A conference call has been scheduled for Friday, May 18th.

If credit issues are to be discussed, this is the call in number we will
use.
If credit issues are not to be discussed, a separate call in number will be
set up and you will be notified with the new dial in numbers.

DATE:  Friday, May 18th

TIME:   10:00 am (Central) - should last approx 1 hour

CALL IN #:  1-877-214-0402

HOST CODE: 564778   (Steve Kean's use only)

PARTICIPANT
CODE:  285987

If anyone needs to call in from an international location, please contact
Maureen McVicker at 713-853-1808 and she will set up an international number
too.

______________________________________________________________________________
__________________

Here is the summary Jeff Dasovich sent regarding yesterday's conference call.

Greetings:
In order to keep everyone in the loop, the folks on today's call wanted to
send out a brief summary of the call for the benefit of those who couldn't
make it.  Apologies for any omissions, inaccuracies, etc.  Others who were on
the call please chime in if I've gotten anything wrong, or missed anything.

Best,
Jeff

SUMMARY
Enron, Duke, El Paso and Williams were on the call, as was Michael Hoffman of
the Blackstone Group (the Governor's financial advisors).
On the subject of how the group would organize itself, it was agreed that the
calls would be open to anyone who wanted to participate.
A smaller group consisting of Duke, El Paso, Enron, and Williams would take
the lead on walking the halls of Sacramento, meeting with policy makers, and
advocating whatever plan the group develops.
Folks agreed that achieving a comprehensive solution requires a tangible
process; that is, the principals need to get in a room, face to face, for
however long it takes to work out a resolution.
It was agreed that the process should start no later than the beginning of
next week, and that it should take place in Sacramento.
It was decided that the Legislature and the Attorney General needed to be
brought into the process as soon as possible, i.e., next week.
There was some discussion regarding the release today of "Plan B."  Plan B is
a plan proposed by Democratic and Republican legislators as an alternative to
the MOU that the Governor struck with Edison.  After that call I received a
copy of "Plan B."  If you'd like a copy please send me your fax number.
Folks on the call agreed to have the next "supplier-only" call-in meeting on
Friday.
Finally, Michael Hoffman said that they are hoping to have a "ratings agency
level" presentation prepared by the end of the week.  The goal of the
presentation is to reassure capital markets that the bonds the state seeks to
issue are solidly backed by retail rates.

The Agenda for Tomorrow's Call with the Governor's Staff
Item #1:  The Credit Issue
Michael Hoffman said that the Governor's office wants to start tomorrow's
meeting discussing the creditworthiness issue.
Hoffman said that the Governor's folks are hoping to have completed by the
start of tomorrow's meeting a draft of an agreement between the California
PUC and CDWR.  The agreement is designed to ensure that DWR gets paid for
power services delivered.
If the draft is ready, they'd like to discuss on the call tomorrow.

Item #2:  Identify the Components of a Comprehensive Solution.
It was agreed that our group should put on the table at tomorrow's meeting
the universe of issues that need to be included in a comprehensive solution.
Enron was asked to take a first stab at what those components are.  The
following is a brief outline, which is not intended to be definitive, but a
starting point for discussion.
Utility creditworthiness
retail rates must reflect costs
Increase supply
streamline and otherwise reform the siting process
Decrease demand
establish real-time pricing
implement demand buy-down and other conservation programs
Create a real market
Remove the State from the power-buying business as soon as possible (e.g.,
once new rates are in place and utilities are returned to creditworthiness;
approximately 3-6 months)
Return the procurement role to the utilities
Reinstate Direct Access immediately for all customers
Within 18-24 months, create a "core/noncore" market structure for
electricity, similar to California's market structure for natural gas
Keep the industry in the hands of the private sector
Reject proposals calling on the State to take over transmission, generation,
etc.
Resolve outstanding legal claims, investigations, etc.
Resolution requires certainty and prompt payment (understanding that
discounts on receivables is on the table for discussion)
______________________________________________________________________________
__________________

Attached are the contact lists.


Beavy and I changed the following deals for July and August.  We took all the
August activity to 0.  This is how these deals should be balanced

Deal 318562 with 318686.  And 318691 with 318682.

I'll look at the economics in the morning.


Steve,

Well, TK celebrated 20 years with Enron on January 11.  I did talk with Fran about the status of service awards, and of course, they were suspended in December.  Fran said that they are having discussions about what to do in the future.  It may be a while before this program gets reinstated (if at all).  Until it does, may we go ahead and plan a lunch or something nice for TK?

Kim


Under commitments to PEC, Enron has commited to provide office, computers, trading systems, etc.  If this is changing, I need to know quickly.  I have been provided indications from several outside counterparties, some divisions within Newco and I thought Netco as holding interest in purchasing the Chicago business.  Due to the obvious indication of value for the joint venture with PEC, I believe it imperative that the business/office be operational until March, 2002, at a minimum.

Please advise.

Laura Luce

-----Original Message-----
From: Shepperd, Tammy R.
Sent: Thu 1/3/2002 9:20 AM
To: Luce, Laura
Cc:
Subject: FW: remote offices

Laura,
I understand that the Metals group has asked to keep the Chicago office open until Mar 31 to wind things down.  Do you have any new information on ENA's Chicago folks at this time?  We may ask for a 60 day extension under bankruptcy orders to terminate the lease.

Thanks,
Tammy

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Kitchen, Louise
Sent:   Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:23 PM
To:     Shepperd, Tammy R.; Colwell, Wes
Cc:     Mccarthy, Lance; Corey, Paula; Helton, Susan; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Subject:        RE: remote offices

OK

Please check with Don Miller too.  Netco does not want San Francisco going forward and probably not Chicago.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Shepperd, Tammy R.
Sent:   Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:25 PM
To:     Colwell, Wes; Kitchen, Louise
Cc:     Mccarthy, Lance; Corey, Paula; Helton, Susan
Subject:        remote offices

We have asked EPSC to pay the following leases for the month of January based on feedback from ENA commercial leadership.  My understanding is that we may still reject these leases under the bankruptcy if we do so by Feb 2.  I will revisit the status of these leases with you before February rents are to be paid.

Calgary
Portland
San Francisco
Chicago
Denver

I have also been contacted by Paula Corey,  who is working on the enterprise strategy for the retrieval and disposition of remote office contents in the event any of these offices are closed.  I will keep you posted on the recommendations.

Regards,
Tammy


Further to our conversation, please see attached draft of a GISB for your
review.  Please give me a call with your questions and or comments.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000
09:50 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Corporate Benefits @ ENRON                           10/12/2000 06:23
PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide employees
cc:
Subject: Open Enrollment 2001

Open Enrollment 2001 is going on now through October 22nd, 5pm CST for
regular full-time and regular part-time employees.  Your 2000 elections will
automatically rollover for 2001, so if you don,t want to make any changes, DO
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!  Annual elections for all Flexible Spending Accounts will
rollover too!  Yes, you heard right ) ALL 2000 ELECTIONS WILL AUTOMATICALLY
ROLLOVER FOR 2001, INCLUDING SPENDING ACCOUNTS!

To make it even more convenient, print your 2001 confirmation statement right
from the web site and you,re finished!  Sound easy?  It is!  Don,t have your
packet?  No problem!  You can access the enrollment 2001 web site and print
your personal worksheet right from your desktop.  Call Benefits at
1-800-332-7979, Option 1, for additional information or assistance.
Confirmation statements will be mailed to your home at the end of October and
final changes for 2001 can be made via the web or IVR from 11/8-11/15.

Logon to WWW.ENRON.BENEFITSNOW.COM today!

QUICK FACTS
? 100% Default for All Current Elections and Spending Accounts ) Don,t Want
to Make a Change?
 Then Do Absolutely Nothing ) Your 2000 annual election will ROLLOVER for
2001!

? $250 Medical Deductible Plan for Employees Residing Outside of a Network
Area

? HMO plans going away )
Coventry Health Care of Iowa (formerly known as Principal Health Care)
Presbyterian Health Plan
HealthNet of Oregon (formerly known as Qual/Med)
Blue Shield of California

? Orthodontia treatment is NOT considered a pre-existing condition under the
Enron Corp. Dental Plan.
 The Plan will coordinate with other coverage based on coordination of
benefit (COB) rules.
 (Contact MetLife at 1-800-492-8588 for specific details and information)

? New Hires who make their 2000 elections by 10/16 will receive their 2001
packets the first week of
 November for enrollment during 11/8-11/15; elections not in by 10/16 will
require a manual enrollment
 for 2000 and 2001 and must be made within 31 days of their hire date

? Provider directories can be accessed directly from the enrollment 2001 web
site or - 1) link directly
 to the providers through the HR/Benefits Intranet Website or 2) go directly
to the source by logging
 on through the web at:

www.cigna.com        www.vsp.com
www.provider.uhc.com/enron     www.merck-medco.com


I'm available any time Friday, and tomorrow afternoon is fine, especially
after 230.

Kay

From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/29/2001 10:42 AM
To: Fred Mitro/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement

Fred / Kay:

I spoke to Duran this morning, and he and I would like to meet together with
us to discuss the Midway project and whether or not we will be able to
utilize TurboPark Phase 2. I previously told him that because of timing
considerations and because there may be certain agreements that will be
difficult to make TurboPark compliant (such as the attached interconnect
agreement from FPL), that Phase 2 may not be practical for purposes of this
project.

I think this would be a good discussion to have on Friday, because we should
have more information on the GE7FAs and should have already spoken with TECO
on their proposed MOU (and maybe even the tolling agreement). What are your
schedules on Friday?

I also would like to schedule a call for tomorrow with TECO to go over the
MOU. Fred - Please coordinate with Kay and schedule something with Becky
Alex. I would prefer the afternoon if that's OK with you guys, and would like
45 min. before the call for us to meet seperately. Also Fred, please advise
on the status of the tolling agreement.

Kay - attached is FPL's standard form interconnect agreement. I was thinking
that Carlos would be a good choice to review it as he is currently working
with accounting / finance on an Ameren interconnect, so he will already be
familiar with the likely issues. Please let me know what you think. It will
be important to give Duran a summary of likely accounting / finance issues
related to this agreement on Friday.

Hope you both had good weekends.

Regards,

Ben
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Krause
Sent: Mon 5/21/2001 9:00 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay
Cc: Ben Jacoby
Subject: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement

Please see attached for your review and comments.

 <<FPL Construction & Connection Agreement Generic.doc>>


got it


Hey, it works for me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 4:06 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: ii travel

What an intelligent requirement.
-----Original Message-----
From:   Chris.Germany@enron.com [SMTP:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent:   Thursday, May 24, 2001 4:04 PM
To:     Ingrid.Immer@williams.com
Subject:        RE: ii travel

Actually I don't need any more as long as my prospective mate has 1 or 2
less than me :o)

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com>@ENRON
             [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com << File: mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com >> ]

   Sent:   Thursday, May 24, 2001 3:46 PM
   To:     Germany, Chris
   Subject:  RE: ii travel

   Like I'm at 99...  What are you shooting for, exactly?
     -----Original Message-----
     From:   Chris.Germany@enron.com [SMTP:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
     Sent:   Thursday, May 24, 2001 3:19 PM
     To:     Ingrid.Immer@williams.com
     Subject:        RE: ii travel

     Shooting for triple digits?

         -----Original Message-----
        From:   "Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com>@ENRON
                  [
     mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com << File: mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com >>
      << File:
     mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com << File: mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com >>

     >> ]

        Sent:   Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:59 PM
        To:     Germany, Chris
        Subject:  RE: ii travel

        Bumping up mine.
          -----Original Message-----
          From:   Chris.Germany@enron.com [SMTP:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
          Sent:   Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:53 PM
          To:     Ingrid.Immer@williams.com
          Subject:        RE: ii travel

          And what exactly will you be doing while I'm bumping up that
     magic
          number??

              -----Original Message-----
             From:   "Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com>@ENRON
                       [

     mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com << File: mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com >>
      << File:
     mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com << File: mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com >>

     >>
           << File:

     mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com << File: mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com >>
      << File:
     mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com << File: mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com >>

     >>

          >> ]

             Sent:   Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:48 AM
             To:     Germany, Chris
             Subject:  ii travel

             Just so you can start planning your night of debauchery now, I
     will
          be
             going on a one-night trip to NYC Jun 4, returning Jun 5.


Let's try this again! - Pam

>Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 16:13:42 -0600
>To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
>From: Pamela Vande Krol Castro <castro@rice.edu>
>Subject: latest roster - Rice
>
>Here is your latest roster for MGMT 656. Let me know if you need the list
>of e-mail addresses or if there are any discrepancies that I should
>address. Thanks for your help! - Pam (713-348-6223)

 - 656.doc


If you run a business and are reading this e-mail
	chances are you have probably heard of merchant
	accounts.

	While there are lots of other Merchant Account
	Venders telling you all the same thing, we don't
	have any limited time offers, no monthly sales
	or any other slick marketing techniques.

	Our Prices are the lowest, we never have set up
	fee or application fee.  Our Monthly rates
	already are super low, our transaction fee
	is so low it's almost free!!

        Reply to this e-mail with your

        Name:
        Phone Number:
        Best time to call :

	One of our helpful staff will call you and help
	you set up your account.

	For Whatever size your business is, we have an
	account perfect for you.  If you have any
	previous credit problems? Don't worry about it
	because we won't either!!

	While our competition may have a sale this month,
	Or won't charge you a set up fee today. We have
	a sale everyday.  All you need to do to take
	advantage of this every day offer is simply

	Reply today and you can accept;

	Visa   Mastercard   American Express

	Discover   Novus   Direct Checks

        Fax Checks and  Also Accept Debit Cards !!

        Remember, this is not a sale, not a limited
	time offer.  We Offer the best rates, all the
	time.

        You are 99.8% GUARANTEED to get a merchant account.

	So what are you waiting for?

        For more information please:

        Reply to this e-mail with your

        Name:
        Phone Number:
        Best time to call :

        It's that easy.

---------------------------------------------------
	To be Removed from this list Please reply
	with "Remove" in the subject line
	and you will be removed within 24 hours.

fyqukgcivgjfttim


Thanks for your nice note.  I have fun being here, which makes all of this
even better!  --Sally

From: Jeffrey McMahon/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/16/2001 11:44 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Promotion

Sally

Congrats on your promotion to MD.  If anyone around this place deserves it,
it's you!!  Hope all is well.


I need to place a $0 bid for Steve Christie and a $0 bid for Wade Richey.

Thanks


Ben - absolutely, please volunteer via the link provided in my original
memo.  Thanks Shelly

Benjamin Rogers
10/11/2000 05:25 PM
To: Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Super Saturdays

Shelly:
I received your e-mail regarding this years Super Saturday's.  I am currently
an Associate, but as an Analyst I participated in a couple of Super
Saturday's, but haven't done any in a little while, so I wanted to offer up
my services.  Please let me know if there is anything I can do, because I'll
be more than happy to help out again.  Thanks!
Ben


not necessarily looking for predictive power.  that's a 3 year project.  just for market making skillset.  The work that Dave Forster did was just for front month.  That creates month 1.  Then, similar logic has to create a month 1/month 2 spread to create a month 2 outright market.   Same for month 2/ month 3 to create month 3.  There might be 24-36 individual markets to create a forward curve.  Sometimes month 1 has correlation to the month 1/ month 2 spread.  Sometimes it does not.  Must create a system that is mechanical but very easy for a human to add bias.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thuraisingham, Ravi
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	Neural Networks

John, I just wanted to give you heads up that I did look into the subject system to learn from what your trading activities and then figure ways to automate some aspects of you daily activities.  I will try to send you a few power point slides showing my initial thoughts on the system.

It appears that neutral network (AI is a subset of this class of learning systems) type of model that takes input from all available sources (including actual market feedback, weather and other fundamentals) and uses curve building functions and other existing tools as transfer functions, along with your own thinking (your processing functions that your neurons are wired up to do), could help the neural network to learn and eventually provide the necessary predictive power.

Ravi Thuraisingham, CFA
Director, Storage Trading
Enron Broadband Services
p  713.853.3057
c  713.516.5440
pg 877.680.4806
ravi.thuraisingham@enron.com


Notice No. 01-97
March 20, 2001

TO:
All Exchange Members

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
NYMEX ACCESS(r) Web Site

As of Tuesday, March 20, 2001, the NYMEX ACCESS(r) web site remains
unavailable for the ACCESS session for trade date March 21st.

Please call the NYMEX ACCESS Control Center (NACC) for all NYMEX ACCESS price
information at 1-800-438-8616.

We will provide an update regarding the status of the web site on Wednesday,
March 21st.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-97)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Please fined attached translation of articles from Denryoku Business
Sokuhou dated March 7
and the March edition of Energy Forum.

Best regards,
IRJ PR Services

 - Denryoku Business Sokuhou.doc
 - Energy Forum.doc


Thanks Gerald.  Is there any way that I can get a copy of Exhibit "A", the
original confirmation?  I know the auditors will want to see that as well.  I
can either pick up a copy or your assistant could fax it to me at (713)
646-2495.  Let me know.  Thanks!

Kim Theriot
x. 31771

To: Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ONEOK Assignment

Attached is the assignment.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 03:17 PM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	04/20/2001 03:51 PM

		 To: Paul T Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Nicole Cortez/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: ONEOK Assignment

Please disregard to prior version and use this one.


what is the latest

Hunter


Dear Mr. Lay,

For what it is worth, I believe this move, although very unfortunate given Andy's long service to Enron, is the right thing to do. In the way that Enron has historically been the poster child for corporate innovation, I hope you will now lead us in the direction that makes us the poster child for handling a crisis of investor confidence. Enron is such an amazing company, I trust you will do everything necessary to work cooperatively with the investor community to restore the company to its former greatness.

Respectfully yours,

Elliot Mainzer
Renewable Power Desk
West Power Trading

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Ken Lay- Chairman of the Board@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:50 PM
To:	All Enron Worldwide@ENRON
Subject:	Jeff McMahon Named CFO

Today we announced the appointment of Jeff McMahon as Enron's chief financial officer.  In my continued discussions with the financial community yesterday and today, it became clear that this move was required to restore investor confidence.  Jeff has unparalleled qualifications and a deep and thorough understanding of Enron.  He is already on the job and hard at work on the issues before us.  Andy Fastow will be on a leave of absence from the company.

Jeff had been serving as chairman and CEO of Enron Industrial Markets. He joined Enron in 1994 and spent three years in the London office as chief financial officer for Enron's European operations.  Upon returning to the U.S., Jeff was executive vice president of finance and treasurer for Enron Corp.  In 2000, he was named president and chief operating officer of Enron Net Works.

I know all of you are concerned about the continuing decline in our share price.  I am too, and we are working very hard to turn it around.  Appointing Jeff as CFO is one important step in that process.  But most of the solution involves just continuing to do our jobs with excellence.  The fundamentals of our business are strong, and I think the market will begin to see that as we continue to perform.

Please join me in giving Jeff your full support, and thank you for all of your continued hard work.


FYI-
We need to be more careful with which of the two curves above we use for
physical deals.  We have had some substantial OA for Jan 01 production
because the basis curves for these two locations were .30 different.  Usually
these are less than .05 different.  If you have a physical mich physical it
should be Mich_cg-gd in tagg(which is michigan consolidated pipe in sitara),
if it is consumers power, it will be mich/cons and cec pipe in sitara.  Any
questions, ask.  Thanks.
PL


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001 02:09 PM -----

	Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/19/2001 02:05 PM

		 To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Florida Power Corp.

I'll send something up within the hour.

Veronica

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Perlingiere, Debra
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 1:51 PM
To: Espinoza, Veronica; Vanek, Darren; Williams, Jason; DePaolis, Tammi
Cc: Diamond, Russell
Subject: Florida Power Corp.

Follow up to e-mail request for credit worksheet  for FPC on April 11th.
Tammi needs to send a draft to the customer today.

Thanks !!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Chris Waits <chris@apbenergy.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:35 AM
To:	Shively, Hunter S.
Subject:	Enron Quotes 12-20-01

These Markets are indicative only!

Christopher L. Waits
Chief Operating Officer
APB Energy Inc.
502-327-1404
Chris@apbenergy.com

 - Enron Quotes 12-20-01 Morning.xls


EOL is launching NNG capacity on Monday, October 30.

Product Type:  US Phy Pipeline Capacity-NNG

Enron Entity:  Northern Natural Gas Company

Deadline:  Need approvals from Credit by Thursday morning, October 26 and
Legal by Friday afternoon, October 27.  (Karen, as discussed, you will not
have approvals for these counterparties since they are for NNG).

The attached excel spreadsheet below contains the customer list from NNG
(with "credit limits" from NNG Credit's Paul Cherry).

---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 09:40 AM
---------------------------

Naveed Ahmed@ENRON
10/19/2000 04:22 PM
To: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: NNG Credit Lines

Lisa,

The list of customers for NNG capacity is attached below

Thanks

Naveed
---------------------- Forwarded by Naveed Ahmed/NA/Enron on 10/19/2000 04:22
PM ---------------------------

David Forster
10/19/2000 04:03 PM
To: Carl Carter/NA/Enron@Enron, Naveed Ahmed/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: NNG Credit Lines

---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/Corp/Enron on 10/19/2000
04:02 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Paul Cherry                           10/19/2000 03:56 PM

To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ted Chavez/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Sandy
Sheffield/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: NNG Credit Lines

 In reference to our conversation, I have attached the Credit Limits for the
NNG Customers.

 I may have some additions on Tuesday, although it would be a small number.

 If you have any questions, please advise.

 Regards.


Please print this out and put a copy in our file for Colombian trading (Tana
may know where that should be).
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 09:37 AM -----

	"Figueroa Sierra & Asociados" <fsa3@cable.net.co>
	11/12/1999 10:14 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Legal Survey update

Electronic Mail Transmittal Form

FIGUEROA SIERRA & ASOCIADOS
A   B   O  G   A   D  O   S

Santaf, de Bogot? D.C., Colombia

URGENT:         X         NORMAL:

FOR:                        Mark Taylor, Esquire
                                 Alan Aronowitz, Esquire

COMPANY:           ENRON NORTH AMERICA CORP.

DATE:                    November 12, 1999

MESSAGE:

ANNEX:                cover letter.doc
                                legal survey update.doc
                                legal survey update (blacklined).doc

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

 - att1.htm
 - legal survey update (blacklined).doc
 - legal survey update.doc
 - cover letter.doc


We will hold a conference call within 1 to 1 1/2 hours after the conclusion
of the FERC meeting this morning on California.  Joe Hartose and Donna Fulton
are at the Commission for the meeting, and they are hoping to talk with FERC
staff after the meeting to get a better idea of the thinking at FERC, so we
would like to hold off on the conference call until they have these
discussions.

Therefore, we will send out a follow up email establishing the time and call
in number once the meeting is over and I have a chance to talk to Joe and
Donna.

Sarah

----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 11/01/2000 09:42 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	10/27/2000 09:24 AM

		 To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: New ISO Price Cap


Can anyone remember if they worked on this last year?  I only remember that I
didn't know what it was then and I still don't know what it is.   Thanks.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/22/99 03:30
PM ---------------------------

Ava Syon
12/22/99 11:41 AM
To: John Ale/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Eric Benson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael R
Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Mary Nell Browning/LON/ECT@ECT, James V Derrick@Enron,
Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ron W JOHNSON@ENRON, Elizabeth Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurie
Lee/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eric Newell/EWC/Enron@Enron, Janet
Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rex
Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Molly Sample/Houston/Eott@Eott, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shemeika
Scroggins/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Norma Tidrow/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Robin Tompkins@ENRON, Adam
Umanoff/EWC/Enron@Enron, Rob Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Randy
Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Walt Zimmerman/Houston/Eott@Eott
cc: Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: 1999 Enron Corp. Compliance Report

 Attached hereto, please find a copy of the Compliance Report that may be
used to report 1999 compliance activities.

 In addition, I am sending this material to each of you via lotus, and/or the
Internet, if appropriate, so that yu might have the form at your disposal.

 Please note that thes reports are due March 31, 2000.

 We intend to submit the documentation to the Audit Committee of the Enron
Corp. Board of Directors at the October, 2000 meeting.

 The 1998 Enron Corp. Compliance Report submitted by each of the operating
entities will be sent to each of you under separate cover.

 Please call Sharon Butcher at (713) 853-7224 if you have any questions.

 Thank you.

Ava


Don't be too hard on him just yet.  Remember that we talked about many
similar issues here when they first came up.  Maybe after we've been through
these with him once he will negotiate them in the first case and only bring
the tough sticking points to us.

Louise Kitchen
01/17/2000 02:25 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Eastern - Summary of their Response to PA/ETA

Please deal with this for me - but my initial thoughts are that we cannot
address the majority of these.

Thanks

---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT on 01/17/2000
08:22 PM ---------------------------

David Forster
01/14/2000 06:43 PM
To: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Eastern - Summary of their Response to PA/ETA

I'm running out of time - can you handle?

Thanks,

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/LON/ECT on 14/01/2000 18:41
---------------------------

Justin Boyd
14/01/2000 11:36
To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Eastern - Summary of their Response to PA/ETA

PA

They wish to amend the PA such that:

Enron warrants that their use of the passwords and the Website does not cause
them to breach any third party rights
they only notify us of unauthorised disclosure or use of passwords upon their
learning of the same.
they can withdraw or amend information provided to Enron from time to time

ETA

They do not want to be bound by future terms and conditions imposed by Enron
(see 1(iii))
They wish to restrict our use of information to Enron Group companies (see
last sentence of 2(b))
They feel unable to make the statement in the first sentence of 2(d), since
they trade through various group company agents on behalf of a BV principal
To establish a tangible audit trail and for verification, they wish to be
able to verify our paper confirms (see 3(e))
They wish to restructure the indemnity entirely (see 4), such that each party
is liable for losses suffered by the other due to its own wilful
default/negligence/omission.
They wish to have the right to terminate the ETA (see 6(a)), and wish that
electronic notices be deemed sent when the sender receives notice from the
system of delivery or failed delivery (see 6(e)).

Some of these are more important than others, but there are some key points.
Please let me know what you think - thanks

Justin


CABLE, BROADCAST, DBS, CE, PHONE PLAYERS DUEL OVER ITV POLICY

04/06/2001
Public Broadcasting Report
(c) Copyright 2001 Warren Communications News, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Cable operators, programming networks, broadcasters, DBS providers, consumer
electronics interests, Bell companies, ISPs, sports leagues, software
developers, electronic program guide creators, personal video recording firms
and consumer groups all battled over possible interactive TV (ITV)
regulations at FCC. In comments filed in response to Commission's ITV
inquiry, 28 entities debated whether federal govt. should regulate nascent
interactive market in wake of AOL's takeover of Time Warner (TW) earlier this
year. They also feuded over how govt. should define interactive services if
it chose to regulate them.
Pushing for "technologically neutral nondiscrimination safeguards" on such
vertically integrated MSOs as AOL TW, group of major programmers urged FCC to
mandate that all broadband distributors carrying any ITV signals forward
signals for all programmers on their cable systems. Group, consisting of
Disney, Univision, USA Networks and Viacom/CBS, also called on Commission to
ban discriminatory routing or caching practices that would permit cable
operators to send their affiliated programming at faster speeds than rival
networks. Programmers contended that consumers shouldn't have to buy
additional set-top box to receive unaffiliated ITV services. "It is far
easier and requires far less intrusive government regulation to prevent
monopoly power from distorting a relatively new market than it is to combat
monopoly power already unleashed in a more developed market," group said.
Public interest groups, ALTV, APTS, BellSouth, EarthLink, Gemstar-TV Guide
International, MSTV, NAB, PBS (PBR March 23 p3) and SBC Communications all
made similar arguments in favor of FCC's adopting ITV rules. For instance,
joint filing by Media Access Project, Consumers Union, Consumer Federation of
America and Center for Media Education called on Commission "to move
expeditiously to begin a rulemaking establishing open access for providers of
enhancements on all platforms, whether cable, DBS, DTV or new technologies
yet unknown." They contended that agency's failure to act would allow cable
MSOs to "become the gatekeepers of what has thus far been a gateless online
community" and devastate independent content providers. Without safeguards,
they said, "ITV is likely to become a digital mirror image of the current
closed multichannel cable model."
Regulatory opponents countered that imposing ITV restrictions on cable
systems would discourage them from starting new services, hampering
development of emerging industry. Opponents, including AOL TW, AT&T,
Cablevision Systems, Charter, Canal Plus Technologies, Comcast, NCTA, NFL,
OpenTV, Progress&Freedom Foundation and group of 4 programmers, declared it
was too early to impose obligations on ITV providers. They said early
regulation would be unworkable, creating administrative nightmare.
Calling even "the threat of regulation" of ITV market "a major mistake,"
NCTA, for example, argued that "there is simply no basis for assuming a
problem and proposing regulatory solutions." Saying FCC deliberately had
refrained from imposing similar rules on cable high-speed data services,
which are much further along in development, NCTA said Commission should
refrain from regulating ITV services for same reason. It also warned that
agency had very limited authority to regulate ITV services under
Communications Act and easily could violate First Amendment rights of cable
operators if it tried to do so. Calling inquiry "a peculiar and misguided
proceeding," NCTA said First Amendment "would seem to preclude the very
regulations suggested by the notice which would interfere with cable
operators' constitutionally protected editorial judgments."
Taking different tacks, DBS providers EchoStar and DirecTV said in separate
filings that they wanted FCC to keep close tabs on cable operators so they
wouldn't use their market power to keep interactive TV services from other
multichannel operators, including satellite TV companies. DBS companies said
they were concerned that cable companies might have unfair advantage in
marketplace if both industries were regulated in same way by Commission.
DirecTV said it was "premature" for agency to fully regulate ITV services,
but it favored "continued monitoring by the FCC of the potential for
anticompetitive behavior by cable operators." "Regulatory intervention at
this nascent stage of ITV development makes little sense," DirecTV said:
"There are as yet no dominant providers of ITV services, and the marketplace
is still in the process of sorting out the technological standards" that it
will follow during future delivery. EchoStar said there was "absolutely no
basis for imposing" ITV carriage obligations on distributors lacking market
power in any relevant market such as itself. Such action would penalize new
entrants and favor incumbent cable operators, filing said.
FCC/CAPITOL HILL
In action that will significantly limit number of low-power FM (LPFM)
stations to be licensed, FCC released decision April 2 saying LPFM stations
must meet same 3rd adjacent channel interference protection requirement as
full-power stations. Order implements requirements of rider on FCC
appropriations bill signed into law in Dec. Commission expects to complete
action on its LPFM licensing window in few months, it said in order, and then
will direct Mass Media Bureau to open window to allow LPFM applicants that
didn't meet 3rd channel requirements to try to come into compliance. FCC
Chmn. Powell said action allowed Commission to begin granting construction
permits for at least some LPFM stations, and agency had begun independent
testing to determine impact of LPFM stations on full-power FM stations and
translators. As part of order, FCC also implemented congressional mandate
that denies LPFM license to former pirate radio operators. FCC Comr.
Furchtgott-Roth issued separate statement saying he supported move to
implement congressional mandate but believed FCC should have delayed LPFM
licensing while it went through rulemaking process in order to comply with
Administrative Procedure Act.
------
Sen. Cochran (R-Miss.) introduced S-604 to reauthorize PTV's Ready to Learn
and Ready to Teach programs. Bill also would graduate Mathline, a component
of programs providing professional development models for teachers of
mathematics, to TeacherLine, more comprehensive professional development tool
for K-12 teachers. Citing research by U. of Ala. and U. of Kan., Cochran said
Ready to Learn was having positive impact on children and their parents.
Studies showed that Ready to Learn families read books together more often
and for longer periods than nonparticipants. Surprisingly, studies said Ready
to Learn children watched 40% less TV and were more likely to choose
educational programs when they did watch, he said. Advent of digital
broadcasting, which allows broadcast of multiple video channels and data
simultaneously, will make it possible for instructional materials to be
distributed on full-time, continuous channels when teachers and students need
it, Cochran said.
------
FCC regulatory fees would increase average of 7.75% for FY 2001, agency said
in proposed rulemaking released March 29. Fees generally followed previous 2
years' practice of across-board increase to meet congressional mandate for
FCC to recoup larger portion of its operating budget through regulatory fees.
Congress required Commission to collect $200.1 million in regulatory fees
this year, up $14.4 million from FY 2000. In early years, FCC attempted to
base regulatory fees on actual cost of regulation, but it generally has used
across-board increases since FY 1999. It said it hoped to have new cost
accounting system in place in time for setting fees for FY 2002. Comments on
fees are due April 27, replies May 7 (MD 01-76).
------
Heads of 4 national public broadcasting organizations and many local PTV
station managers expressed appreciation at April 3 gathering in Washington to
Public Broadcasting Caucus in House which now has 70 members. Saying public
broadcasting always had enjoyed strong support in Congress, CPB Pres. Robert
Coonrod said new group would be asset in furthering that support "for our
mission of providing valuable education services to the American people." NPR
Pres. Kevin Klose said he hoped caucus would serve as effective forum for
discussion of complex policy issues facing public radio. Pres. Pat Mitchell
said "PBS looks forward to working with the caucus to strengthen the unique
and important role that public television plays in providing nonviolent and
educational programs and services to America's children and their families."
New APTS Pres. John Lawson said caucus came at "critical" time, when PTV
stations were bracing for transition to DTV.
------
If FCC reallocates any part of Instructional TV Fixed Service (ITFS) spectrum
or 3G mobile device service, "the capacity, usefulness and value of ITFS
would be significantly reduced," Miss. Humanities Council said in ex parte
filing on notice of proposed rulemaking on 3G spectrum allocations. Even if
only part of spectrum is taken away, many educational institutions would
either lose their ITFS service altogether or face new equipment costs,
service disruption, cutbacks, lower quality of service and signal
interference, council said. "In either scenario, the ITFS community would be
incapable of supporting advanced wireless services and promoting the
development of broadband services to the educational community and to
underserved communities nationwide," it said.
------
FCC Chmn. Powell called on Congress to bolster agency's enforcement powers,
measure he said was necessary to protect consumers as Commission executed
streamlined business plan that's "aligned with the realities of a dynamic and
converging marketplace." He also told House Telecom Subcommittee at hearing
March 29 that legislative approval was necessary to carry out his bureau
restructuring plan, which still was being formulated, and his "policy vision"
of making FCC more "efficient, effective and responsive." Powell said FCC, if
given sufficient enforcement capabilities, would guarantee "fairness to all,
and allegiance to none," but warned potential regulatory violators that
Commission likewise would levy severe penalties. "If you cheat, I'm going to
hurt you, and hurt you hard," he said. Ability to impose heavier fines and
having fewer time constraints to carry out enforcement action via changes in
statute of limitations are 2 tools Congress could give FCC, Powell said. If
Commission can fine a company only $15,000 when companies earn millions or
even billions of dollars annually, then they will view fines "just as the
cost of business" and have less incentive to comply, he said. Commerce
Committee Chmn. Tauzin (R-La.) said Powell spent 3 years as commissioner
"watching how not to run the FCC" and expressed confidence that under his
leadership it "would become an agency that fosters innovation and investment
rather than one that inhibits the deployment of new services." He told Powell
he would work with him to "rationalize the structure" of agency so services,
rather than service providers, are subject to regulatory or deregulatory
framework.
------
Communications lawyers on Washington Legal Foundation panel on FCC and
Communications Policy split 2-2 on whether major revamp of FCC was needed
immediately. "It's hard to disagree about the need to overhaul the FCC," said
attorney Nick Allard of Latham&Watkins. Moderator and former FCC Chmn.
Richard Wiley did disagree, sharply, with Allard -- who called for abolishing
4 of 5 commission seats and actively involving Commerce Dept. and NTIA in
regulation of various communications industries. What FCC needs, countered
Wiley, is more delegation of authority to staff and more rapid decisions --
something that can be accomplished with present structure -- and "Chmn.
Powell can get it done." Because of congressional respect for Powell, any
agency reform "is going to come first from the FCC itself," rather than from
Hill, Wiley predicted. Panelist Charles Kennedy of Morrison&Foerster
generally agreed with Allard, while David Poe of LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene&MacRae
partly sided with Wiley. Commission doesn't need revamping for short term,
Poe said, but major overhaul may be necessary in long term. Kennedy said FCC
operations were "outmoded... We are going to have to make some fundamental
changes... if things don't turn around." Allard listed 10 questions that must
be answered on FCC's future, including whether competition was prerequisite
for deregulation or was it other way around and did Commission's current
organizational structure make sense. Poe said Powell had shown "he's not
afraid to grapple" with tough issues and that there were many "ambiguities
and contradictions" in 1996 Telecom Act. "Statutory reform" of FCC is needed,
he said, but it will be very hard to get Congress to pass legislation on
issue. On digital TV, Poe said FCC had tried to push broadcasters into new
technology but "you can't make a market if the market isn't there."
------
FCC set deadlines March 28 for comment on its proposed rulemaking on DTV
must-carry issue following publication of notice in Federal Register.
Commission tentatively concluded in Jan. against imposing dual-carriage
obligations on cable operators during current digital broadcasting transition
but left issue open for final determination. Comments are due May 10, replies
June 25.
------
Rep. Boucher (D-Va.) challenged TV copyright owners concerned about piracy
from digital set-top boxes to "present a united front" on what home copying
they would accept in exchange for encryption technologies. At kickoff of
American U. Washington College of Law's new Glushko-Samuelson Intellectual
Property (IP) Clinic, he said he hoped Congress would approve measure akin to
Sec. 1201(k) of Digital Millennium Copyright Act. That Act requires VCRs to
respond to technologies encoded on videocassettes to stop people from copying
films where there's no reasonable expectation of being allowed to do so (as,
for example, when movies are rented from video store).

Folder Name: Cable Open Access
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 79

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClips or contact Dow
Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Steve/Rick/Paul -- In case Bev didn't mention the following to you, I thought
you'd like to see the great feedback we got on Sue's participation in the
VICA Energy Summit.  She really stepped up when we found out at the last
minute that Enron didn't have a representative -- and agreed to fly to LA and
speak on 12 hours notice.  A consummate team player -- kudos, Sue!  kd
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 04/06/2001
07:33 PM ---------------------------

Susan J Mara
04/06/2001 04:53 PM
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: VICA

I just heard from one of our lobbyists, Bev Hansen.  She has received "many"
calls from legislators and others who saw me at the VICA conference.  She
said from their comments that I "knocked their socks off".  They also were
impressed that I was "right there with answers to all the hard questions".
And, in taking on David Freeman, I "made him look like he should retire."
Yahoo! She said some of the Legislators told her that they were sitting
around thinking about who to talk to on these matters and, as a result of
seeing me, thought, "Enron."  I think she mentioned to Rick that she got good
feedback from people on my "speech."

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


Sarah I trust you.  Just tell her what we need.


I think your all on something. There aint no pictures of Joe or any other deer close to what we've been seeing.
-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 2:54 PM
To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; chet_fenner@bmc.com; knipe3@msn.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com
Subject: RE: JOE IS A DEER HUNTING SUPERSTAR

where did mertz shoot his?
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Erik Wollam; Parks, Joe; chet_fenner@bmc.com; knipe3@msn.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com
Subject: JOE IS A DEER HUNTING SUPERSTAR

Gentlemen,

            Please access www.mertzranch.com <http://www.mertzranch.com/> and witness my photographic skills and Joe's obvious hunting skills as a picture of Joe's 9 point is being proudly displayed on Michael's web-site!!!! Methinks using Joe's deer and my photographical skills as a shameless plug for Michaels ever expanding  Outfitting Monopoly?.should grant us (hunter and photographer) certain royalties normally associated with this sort of unlicensed usage of this form of media. Basically, we need a price break for use of picture!!!! Anyway, pretty cool seeing your very own photo displayed on a website!!!!

                                                                                PIGGY

************************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. and/or its relevant affiliate(s) and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
************************************************************************


It was really good talking to you the other day.  You've been on my mind for
a while.  I hope you can come visit!


Hi -- I've drafted an op ed piece that could go this week while the papers
are discussing Cal-ISO/FERC's latest move in California. I haven't discussed
this with Jim, but either Karen or I could suggest it if the piece is strong.

Karen, I went with the interpretation that Enron doesn't want to see retail
price freezes lifted because that would discourage utilities from buying
long-term power or structured products from us.

Jeff, as always, I could use your help in making sure I've made the right
interpretations and that I've included all the important points.

Karen -- one more thing. I think we could take the first 2 paragraphs of this
piece and add a third graf quickly explaining Enron's position (soft caps are
a good first step, but we gotta eliminate them entirely) and run this as an
eBiz if you'd like.

Please let me know your thoughts.


Becky:

In response to the second point below, the substation will be owned by FPL.
We do not view that as a result of interconnection that there would be any
liabilities with respect to the FPL system. I would definately like for you
to have your legal counsel review the agreement, however, on this point, and
would like any other legal / commercial comments at your earliest
conveneince. We plan to meet with FPL early next week on this agreement, and
would of course like to incorporate TECO's comments as well.

Regards,

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: "Becky Alex" <rtalex@tecoenergy.com>@ENRON
Sent: Tue 6/5/2001 2:11 PM
To: Jacoby, Ben
Cc:
Subject: Re: FW: Draft FPL Construction & Connection Agreement

Ben,

Nester Martinez in our transmission group reviewed Draft FPL Construction &
Connection Agreement and below are his comments:

? No major concerns with the project or its interconnection. It appears that
this is a basic ring bus design and the 500KV line is adjacent to where the
Midway Energy Center substation will be built. Connecting the station will
require a number of upgrades on the FPL system and the Dynamic Stability
Study indicated no adverse affect to the FPL system.

? The EMPP substation will now be an integral part of the reliability of the
500KV- FPL transmission line (since it will be looped through our
substation). Does EMPP have liabilities associated with the failure of our
equipment that could take the line out of service etc.?  Who will own the
substation?

Could you please respond to the second point.  Thanks, Becky

>>> "Jacoby, Ben" <Ben.Jacoby@ENRON.com> 06/05/01 01:10PM >>>
Becky:

Any update on this?

Thanks,

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Thu 5/31/2001 5:42 PM
To: '"Becky Alex" <rtalex@tecoenergy.com>@ENRON'
Cc: Mitro, Fred
Subject: RE: Draft FPL Construction & Connection Agreement

Thanks much!

  -----Original Message-----
 From:  "Becky Alex" <rtalex@tecoenergy.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Becky+20Alex+22+20+3Crtalex+40tecoenergy+2Ecom+3E+
40ENRON@ENRON.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:36 PM
 To: Jacoby, Ben
 Subject: Re: Draft FPL Construction & Connection
Agreement

 Ben, I have forwarded the Construction and Connection Agreement
to our transmission interconnect "guy" and he is currently reviewing.
He said he should have comments (if any) by Friday June 1.  I will
forward on his comments as soon as I have them.

 Thanks, Becky

 >>> "Jacoby, Ben" <Ben.Jacoby@ENRON.com> 05/30/01 04:06PM >>>
 Becky:

 As promised, attached is the draft agreement. We would
appreciate your
 review of this document at your earliest convenience as we would
like to
 provide FPL with comments as soon as possible. Thanks.

 Ben

  <<FPL Construction & Connection Agreement Generic.doc>>


Another bit of background re Frankfurt (see below).  I would be a little bit
more insistent on German Consulate support than Herr Sturm suggests
(otherwise this could become a black hole for your time).
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/30/99 09:40
AM ---------------------------

"Sturm, Michael" <ST@frankfurt-business.de> on 08/10/99 11:35:23 AM

To:	Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Schroeder <Mark_Schroeder@enron.com>
cc:	"Thomas Geisel (E-Mail)" <tgeisel@ect.enron.com>, "John Thompson (E-Mail)"
<jthompson@ect.enron.com>

Subject:	AW: Houston-Frankfurt

Dear Mr. Kean:

I would like to thank you and Mark Schroeder very much for your time and
outstanding hospitality in Houston.  I very much enjoyed meeting with you
and your message, that your Chairman Kenneth Lay confirmed for dinner with
our Mayor Petra Roth was very well received and we are all very excited and
looking forward to November 30.

However it raises great interest in the question of organization of the
dinner and the additional participating chairpeople of other companies. Will
Enron now invite for that dinner, which I understand will be the gathering
of 10-12 major decision makers in the energy field? If you could be so kind
as to share with us the thoughts of Ken Lay%s office with regards to that
point, or give me a contact there, I would very much appreciate.

An alternative we discussed or as an addition the next day (Lunch), would be
that a business-group would host an event, which could include a wider
audience of business people of Houston.  After having spoken with the German
Consulate in Houston and with the German American Chamber here, it
unfortunately appears as if they will not be capable for s.th. we achieve.
Everybody recommended to work with the reputative Greater Houston
Partnership, whose President was on vacation last week.  I would welcome any
assistance in getting us in contact with them.  Probably it would not take
too many efforts for Enron, to have them consider supporting out idea of
promoting our ideas. To help you pass them, I again include our plan for
Houston (see attached doc).

I will be in contact with your colleague Mark Palmer with regards to the
press-coverage. Thank you for your response to your earliest possible
convenience.

Yours Sincerely

Michael Sturm
Wirtschaftsf"rderung Frankfurt-
Frankfurt Economic Development GmbH
Hanauer Landstr. 182d
60314 Frankfurt am Main
Tel: +011 49 69 212-38764
Fax: +011 49 69 212-36230
E-Mail: st@frankfurt-business.de
http://www.frankfurt-business.de

-----Urspr_ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Steven J Kean [mailto:skean@enron.com]
Gesendet am: Samstag, 7. August 1999 00:30
An: st@frankfurt-business.de
Cc: Mark Schroeder
Betreff:

Ken Lay is confirmed for dinner with the mayor on the evening of November
30.

 - Houstonplan.doc


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Jerry Wilkens

Date:		2/1/2001
Time:		9:00 AM - 9:30 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/04/2001 11:06 AM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	04/03/2001 07:22 PM

		 To: "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)"
<Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Tom Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Tom
Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'"
<alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<trusso@mcnallytemple.com>, <sadlersa@earthlink.net>, <mstultz@epsa.org>,
<rtemple@mcnallytemple.com>, <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>,
<megan.beiser@edelman.com>, <deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com>, <lchurch@epsa.org>,
Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>,
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: IEP Key Messages

Below are key messages we recommend IEP begin using in light of recent
"price gouging/market manipulation" allegations - including the upcoming
State Senate hearings.
Thanks,
Jean

--
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates, Inc.
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)

IEP KEY MESSAGES

Generators have been operating under the rules California established for its
electricity market.  We did not create the market, nor did we write the
rules.  In fact, the "big five" generators did not come to California until
AB 1890 invited them into the state, where they?ve since invested billions of
dollars buying, building and modernizing power plants.

. Energy companies, independent financial analysts and IEP warned that the
PUC was failing to implement AB 1890 properly, and that the market was being
set up to fail, especially the residential market.
. Last summer, generators were urging and offering long-term contacts. They
were flatly rejected.  Had they been adopted, the crisis could have been
prevented or its severity dramatically lessened.
. This crisis was caused by three things . the failure to enter into
long-term contracts, forcing an over-reliance on the spot market; a supply
shortage, and no retail market.  The market can be fixed.  It should not be
abandoned.

We?re an important part of the solution.

. We?ve made extraordinary efforts to keep our plants running during this
crisis to supply California homes and businesses with electricity.
. We?ve offered solutions and been cooperative partners in legislative and
regulatory efforts to end the crisis. . Rather than using tax money, we?re
investing billions of private-sector dollars to buy, modernize and build new
power plants in California . to generate electricity for California.
. Our new and upgraded power plants will help improve California?s air
quality and generate power more efficiently.

We?re hopeful that these hearing focus on facts, fairness and accountability.

. "Witch hunts," "scape-goating" and sensational headlines won?t solve the
problem or end the crisis.


My understanding is that the deal is dead -- stop the presses.

Thanks for all of your help on this -- I appreciated your efforts and
explanations.  Perhaps we will work together again in the future.

Michelle

"Dean Crawford" <dcrawford@davis.ca> on 12/12/2000 03:04:53 PM
To: <Michelle.Cash@enron.com>
cc: "Brian Hiebert" <BFH@davis.ca>
Subject: Celgar

Michelle,
?
Further to my voicemail, should we advise the actuaries to  cease their due
diligence work on the Celgar pension plans? They have just  called me to
advise about some further liabilities under the supplementary plan  for
non-union employees. Thanks.