Post Date: November 15, 2001
Category: MAINTENANCE
Subcategory: NWP MONTHLY MAINTENANCE
Subject: December 2001 Monthly Maintenance

Notice Text:
All Shippers Letter            #01-317
Date:           11/15/01
Time:           16:30 MST

TO:             ALL SHIPPERS

SUBJECT:        DECEMBER 2001 MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE

The following maintenance work is scheduled on Northwest Pipeline for
the month of December.  Potential system impacts are identified below.
Volume impact and scheduled maintenance out of service date estimates
are stated as accurately as possible, but are subject to change based
on factors such as ambient temperatures, actual market demand, etc.
Any variance from this notice will be communicated to customers as
quickly as possible before commencing work.  All capacities listed in
this maintenance schedule are in Dekatherms.

**** Denotes capacity impacts that are in addition to those posted on the Annual Maintenance Letter.

DECEMBER 2001 MAINTENANCE:

Replace Engine Chocks at the Snohomish Compressor station

Date:                   October 22, 2001 to December 8, 2001
Design Cap:             720,000 Dth
Available Cap:  614,000 Dth

Replace the Chocks on the units at the Snohomish compressor station.  Only one unit will be unavailable at a time during this work.  Based on current nominations, which are below available capacity, there is no anticipated impact to customers.

Semi-Annual unit inspections at Sumas Compressor station

Date:                   December 4, 2001 to December 5, 2001
Design Cap:             724,000 Dth
Available Cap:  607,000 Dth

Perform annual inspections on C Plant units #7 and #8 at the Sumas compressor station.  Inspection of unit #7 is scheduled for December 4, and unit #8 is scheduled for December 5.  A and B Plants will accommodate any lost capacity.  Based on current nominations, there is no anticipated impact to customers.

Semi-Annual unit inspection at Mount Vernon Compressor station

Date:           December 6, 2001
Design Cap:             722,000 Dth
Available Cap:  696,000 Dth

Perform annual inspections on unit #3 at the Mount Vernon compressor station. Based on current nominations, which are below available capacity, there is no anticipated impact to customers.

Please contact your Marketing Services Representative or the Northwest Pipeline Hotline at (801) 584-7301, for further information.

WGP-W
JR


Continuing on this matter:  I think under ISDA provisions and our Schedule
that emailing would be allowed  see 9eii.  Are you ok with advising Joe that
we think emailing is adequate.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 09:43 AM -----

	Larry Joe Hunter
	04/24/2001 04:02 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: FW: E:mailing vs Faxing Confirmations

The Physical Liquids group is proposing that they begin e-mailing
Confirmations rather than faxing.  Does anyone have any issues with us doing
the same for Financial deals?

Thanks,
Joe Hunter

---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001
03:59 PM ---------------------------

	Samuel Schott
	04/24/2001 03:27 PM

To: Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sundar
Chitradurga/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FW: E:mailing vs Faxing Confirmations

I believe that we should have a meeting on this before we respond.

Sundar, when can you meet for a few minutes?

Joe, let me know if you would like to attend or conference in.

Thanks !!

Samuel x3-9890 (GCP)
Enron Net Works _ Global Data Management

---------------------- Forwarded by Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001 03:19
PM ---------------------------
From: Herbert Goodwin/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/24/2001 01:16 PM
To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: E:mailing vs Faxing

Sam, your name was passed along to me as someone that maybe able to help us.
We are investigating the prospect of emailing our confirmations vs faxing
them and one of the things that came up was the possibility of a drop box
email address for the counterparty involved that would be setup in the global
counterparty system. Any ideas off the top of your head of what it might take
to get this information included in the global counterparty system?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Goodwin, Herbert
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 10:41 AM
To: Flores, Nony
Subject: FW: E:mailing vs Faxing

Nony, there is some discussing around developing an email process for our
confirmations (vs. faxing) and we are wanting to get an opinion from Legal on
the proposal. Can you please let me know what Legal's feelings would be about
such a process? Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sorenson, Jefferson D.
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 3:07 PM
To: Goodwin, Herbert; Loukanis, Linda K.
Cc: Stubbs, Shelly; Bruce, Michelle; Denson, Mary Jane; Gonzales, Alexia;
Goodwin, Herbert; Harris, Stephanie L; Loukanis, Linda K.; Nelson, Damian;
Schultz, Michelle; Scully, James
Subject: E:mailing vs Faxing

Herbert - Would you please investigate what it would take for us to begin
E:mailing our confirmations as opposed to faxing.  Check with Legal, Ron
Nolte, and Global Counterparty.

Linda - let's see about starting Freight off this way.

I would like to go this route if possible.

thanks,
Jeff


Good to hear from you.
After a great F, had an okay G.  Held a lot of term length on the risk/reward
play.  Figured if we got no weather, all the customer and generator buying
would be my stop.  It was.  Amazing that for the drop in price in H, the
strips have really gone nowhere.  just a big chop fest.
i here your arguments, but think they are way exagerated.  Agree with 1.5-2
bcf/d more supply. Call it 2 with LNG.  Imports from Canada should be
negligible.  Now let's assume price for the summer is $4.  No switching, full
liquids extraction, methanol and fertilizer running.  Electric generation
demand, considering problems in west and very low hydro, around 1.5 bcf/d
greater this year with normal weather.  Means you have to price 2 bcf/d out
of market.  Don't think $4 does that.  What level did we start really losing
demand last year?  It was higher than 4.   concerned about recession in
industrial sector thats occuring right now.
Think gas is fairly valued here.  Dont think we're going to 7.  But I think
fear of market considering what happened this past year will keep forward
curve very well supported through spring.  we're already into storage
economics so the front goes where the forward curve wants to go.

slafontaine@globalp.com on 02/26/2001 04:48:06 PM
To: jarnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: mkts

its been a while-hope all is well. not a great few weeks for me in ngas-not
awful just nothing really working for me and as you know got in front of
march/apr a cupla times, no disasters.
   well im bearish-i hate to be so after a 4 buck drop but as i said a month
ago
to you-and now pira coming around. 5.00 gas is a disaster for the natgas
demand.
now production up strongly y on y...you guys agree on the production side?
  i know youve been bullish the summer-think im stll in the minority-but here
you go, we have y on y supplly up 2/bcf+ demnad loss 3.5bcf/d, 5.5 bcf/day y
on
y swing . then i submit as we started to see due huge rate increases R/C
demandd
energy conservation will be even more dramatic this summer which will effect
utilty demand/power demand ulitmately.  if pira rite we lost 1.56 in jan for
this factor i say it cud be bigger this summer as ute loads increase, power
pxes
rise and consumers become poorer. there will be more demand flexibilty in the
summer part in the midcon and north as AC is more of a luxury item than heat.
i
say 5-6% lower use in residentail/utilty power consumption due rationing is
another .7/1bcf/d loss.
  put all this together we wud build an addional 1284 apr thru oct on top of
last years 1715  build basis last year temps and todays prices. takes us to
3.6
tcf or so. what am i missing my man-summer has to go to 4 bucks or lower to
restore demand??? thots.

as far as that other thing, the p&c its still alive, shud know more soon and
ill
keep you posted.


Kate,  we received the executed Confirmation Letter from Portland Legal
yesterday with Department of Water Resources a division of the State of
California -CDWR believe it is trade 530608.01.  The confirmation has special
terms to extend the terms of the trade by a specific date and time regarding
the option.
Needed to know if you need a copy of this confirmation to note this and we
have trade date on our confirmation letter as Feb. 22, 2001.  The trade in
enpower has a trade date of Feb 23, 2001 Trader: Tim Belden
   please let me know.

Thank you
Stephanie


Rex:

It was a pleasure meeting you yesterday.  As you requested, I would suggest
the following as your first line of contact for legal matters:

Leslie Hansen (*36121) Non-Disclosure Agreements or Letters of Intent/MOUs
Tana Jones (*33399) Same -- Please copy Tana on any e-mails sent to me.  Tana
does a wonderful job managing projects in the pipeline.
Anne Koehler (*33448) Matters relating to potential equity investments and
other structured relationships
Travis McCullough (*31575) Anne's back-up if she is not available

If in doubt, feel free to call me, and I can track down the appropriate
contact for you.

I have spoken with Mike Haney re the Confidentiality Agreements.

Regards,

Leslie


Kay,

Our deal with Panda Energy involves 4 LM units.  I believe that this is the
total number of units in our current LV Co Gen project.  Ben is planning to
talk with Lee at GE.

I talked with Panda this morning.  They do not have a fixed close date.  They
are working off the assumption that closing will ocurr within 4-6 weeks of
signing the Letter Agreement.  I believe that this is doable.

Chris Booth will provide you with respective unit delivery dates.  He is
working with Matt Tezyk to determine the serial #'s (apparently GE has not
yet assigned serial #'s to the units).  What price are we assigning to the
LLC member interests in the Northwestern Letter Agreement?  Let's stay
consistent with that document.  The person who will be signing for Panda is
Gary Hubbard, Senior Vice President.

The purchase price is $16.45 MM per unit with a 10% development fee payable
to ENA upon execution of the Letter Agreement.  The balance of the purchase
price will escrowed by Panda upon approval of the Facility Agreement (similar
to Intergen structure) and payable to ENA at closing.  Is this the pricing
information that you need to establish the maximum liability amont?

Ben:  We need to talk re: the transformers.  We quoted Panda $950K per unit
for the two transformers.  It is not clear if the transformers will work for
Panda w.r.t. interconnect voltage and plant configuration.  If we are
re-loading with more LM's, do we need to keep the transformers for our use at
LV Co-Gen?

Kathleen:  I have a call into Bill Lamb at Panda regarding the CA's.  I will
let you know when I hear back from him.

Fred

Kay Mann@ENRON
02/26/2001 06:15 PM
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Panda Energy

Fred,

Dale Rasmussen has been handling the breakout contracts for the LV CoGen
project, and I think the form is in good shape. However, the breakout
contract is for all the LV Co Gen units, but that is easy enough to fix. Does
GE know this is coming?

What are you projecting for a closing date?

 We need the unit numbers (original and serial), associated delivery dates,
price attributable to the units (maximum liability amount), price to sell the
LLC member interests, and the contact persons from Panda for the contract.
Will there be a development fee, and if so, how much?

If you get me the particulars of the deal we can work on it in house.  We
have the forms, so we can get cracking without outside counsel.  In fact,
I've been working on the form letter agreement today in connection with the
other deal.  Retaining outside counsel requires internal approval, which I'm
sure we can get in the next day or two, assuming no conflict of interest. I
can get started on the process if you are ready.

If you think these guys are serious, we can set up the LLC's.  We may want
two LLC's if the total price is in excess of $50mm.  Kathleen, please talk to
me before we do this as I think we should discuss the slate of officers.

Kay

Fred Mitro@ECT
02/26/2001 05:56 PM
To: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Panda Energy

Steve:

I talked with Ben this afternoon and understand that we are ready to proceed
with Panda Energy in a transaction involving the sale of member interests in
special purpose entities associated with the four(4) LV units.  I have left a
message with Panda letting them know that we are prepared to proceed and will
begin preparing a set of draft definitive agreements for their review.  I
have asked Panda to confirm that they are ready to receive these documents
and proceed.  I understand that you are in Houston.  Please call/see me
tomorrow morning so that we can discuss this transaction.

Kay:  We need to prepare a draft set of definitive agreements for this
transaction.  Can Carolyn complete this while you are in New York?  Also,
what is the status of the LM Breakout contract for the 4 LV units.  Let me
know.

Kathleen:  We need to confirm tomorrow morning that we have received executed
CA's from Panda.  I have the CA execution originals for the four Panda
entities at my desk for Ben's signature.  These need to be received prior to
sending Panda the definitive agreements.  We will fax signature pages to Ben
tomorrow.

Chris:  See me tomorrow morning to discuss the technical spec's that were
sent to Panda

I will be at my desk by 8 am tomorrow morning.

Thanks,
Fred
x35406


Greetings!  We wanted to let you know that Lourdes created a Hallmark.com
e-card for you.  Click this link to see it, or copy and paste this link into
your Web browser's address line:
http://ecardview.hallmark.com/hmk/Website/greeting.jsp?id=EG3112-043475-526656
0

You can also go through our home page to see it.  Here's a link:
http://www.hallmark.com

Once there, click the "e-cards" link, then scroll to the bottom of the page
to find "pick up a greeting". Click that link and it will ask for your e-mail
address and retrieval number.  Your retrieval number is
EG312434266560.

This e-card will be available for 90 days.  If you'd like to send one back,
use the "send your own greeting" button beside the e-card.  Enjoy!

Jan Scott
Hallmark.com

P.S.  To us, your privacy is a priority.  Here's a direct link to our online
Privacy and Security statement if you'd like to review it.
http://www.hallmark.com/hmk/Website/goto.jsp?CONTENT_KEY=FOOTER_PRIVLEGL&CONTE
NT_TYPE=ARTICLE


The  courses I remember from our trips:
Pevero  GC-Costa Smeralda?  Sardinia??????????????????????????????????
Royal  St. Kitts  GC?????????????????????????????????????
Golf  Ugolino?  Florence??????????????
Sperone GC?  Corsica????????
Royal  Malta GC??????
Eldorado?  Cabo???????????
Maroon  Creek????????
?
Ken  and Mick may remember others (but I doubt it). I look forward to being
with you  and to seeing the latest product of your fertile  imagination.

[Reasoner, Harry]??-----Original  Message-----
From: JHDUNCAN@aol.com  [mailto:JHDUNCAN@aol.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 7:56  AM
To: hreasoner@velaw.com
Cc:  jseidl@myhomekey.com
Subject: Planning monkey  business

Harry (or, again, should I address you as "Houston's Sugar Daddy" as  they
did
at the ADL luncheon)

I am going to take about 1/2 of my  golf clubs to Europe on the coming trip.
?
Mick will probably take  his 5 iron. ?If you and Ken take your clubs then we
could have fun,  exchange money, and get some exercise together.

In this regard, since  you are the student of golf courses everywhere why
don't you extract from  some of your library of golf books some suggested
courses to play. If you  do not have this info in your library I will be glad
to work on this.

Also, and the real point of this e-mail, I want to ask you to  do something
for all of us. I need to know the exact names of the courses  we have played
on previous trips. I know you saved ball markers etc  from each course and my
old brain does not remember these course names. As  you well know, I normally
"tear up" score cards after each match.  ??I ask you to do this for a reason.
?
I have a little gift  for each golfer that will serve as a record of courses
played by us, but I  need the names of the past ones played. ?There is no
rush
on this  request. ?If you will do this, simply bring the list to the
airplane:
you can give this info to me after take off on May 29th. ?If you do  not have
this info at your "finger tips," so be it, we will simply "wing  it."

Hope all is well with you and Macey. ?Brenda and I will see  you guys at the
next ??function, honoring "Houston's Sugar  Daddy" ?and his better half a
week
from Saturday, if not before.

John

cc ?Mick, you are welcome to put your 5 iron in my  bag, no charge.


I am looking forward to meeting you all next week.  In the mean time there
are few things that I want to alert you to:

1)  The course web page can be found at:
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/~berk/teaching/E203/E203.html

It is still under construction, so please wait for the syllabus handed out
during the first lecture before finalizing plans.

2) The Monday class on labor day will be made up on the following Saturday,
or you are welcome to come to Tuesday's lecture that week.  See the syllabus
for details.

3) If you do decide to download the lecture notes, please not the caveat at
the top of the web page.

Professor Jonathan Berk


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 10/16/2000
04:23 PM ---------------------------
From: Diane Bazelides@AZURIX on 10/16/2000 04:22 PM
To: Elizabeth Ivers, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, chensle2, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Litigation Response

Here's the response we're using on the litigation.


Tom,
Don't forget to print 1/15/02 pay stub.  Also, do you still need St. Thomas address?

Lyne


Attached please find a copy of volumes delivered to  Columbia Energy Services
for March 1 thru March 9, 2000.  I downloaded this directly from Michcon's
system  and the actual volumes Columbia received at each meter point is in
the ADJ NOM VOLUME column.  It is broken out in what was delivered in dth and
what was delivered in mcf.    I have also added a column to show the
difference between what was delivered in dth vs mcf.

We had numerous problems with nominations on Michcon's system for the dates
of 3/2 thru 3/7, however Tom Butzon with Michcon worked very hard to make
sure that all of our markets were kept whole.   After reviewing deliveries to
CES per Michcon's system this is the breakout per day:

   Per CES Request  Per Michcon  Difference
3/1/00   11,417    11,417   0
3/2/00   11,417    11,240   (177)
3/3/00   11,417    11,417   0
3/4/00   11,417    11,417   0
3/5/00   11,417    11,417   0
3/6/00   11,417    11,417   0
3/7/00   11,417    11,417   0
3/8/00   11,417    11,417   0
3/9/00   11,450    11,450   0

I spoke with Tom this afternoon regarding the cut on 3/2/00 and he cannot go
back and reallocate that point.    Regarding the increase for 3/8/00 it is
imperative that Donna calls us to let us know that she sent an email due to
the fact that we do not always have time to check email in time to get the
gas put in the position for the next day.  Also in the event that someone is
out and that person cannot check their email, a simple telephone call to the
scheduler would help tremendously.

Reqarding Doug's letter dated 3/7/00 regarding insufficient volumes at
acceptable points for the Michcon Select Program, it is my understanding that
a volume of 7,300 mcf is the requirement CES has to the Select Program.  On
the attached spreadsheet I have broken out the points Enron delivered gas to
CES on the acceptable points and we have met those requirements every day
with the exception of 3/8 and 3/9 where Enron shorted CES volumes at required
Map #'s by 272 mcf.  This was due to late changes we received by our
suppliers.   If CES did incur penalties on 3/1 thru 3/7 then CES needs to
look at how they are allocating each point since certain points are to be
delivered to the Select Program first.   When CES receives all their points
for the day they should first allocate the SELECT points to their SELECT
customers, the remaining points  can then be divided up between their other
non specific customers.   I apologize for the confusion but I believe we have
made a valiant effort to keep CES whole at the proper points as best we
could.

Should you have any questions, please call me at 713-853-9138.

Cora Pendergrass


Yesterday, the European Commission adopted a climate change package, which includes a draft directive on emissions trading, an instrument of EU ratification of the Kyoto Protocol and policies and measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.  Please the attached press release outlining the package.

Major provisions of the draft emissions trading directive include:

The emissions trading scheme has two phases -- first phase (2005 - 2007), second phase (2008 - 2012)

Penalties for non-compliance in first phase are 50 Euros per tonne or twice the average market price, whichever is higher; beyond 2008 the penalty would be 100 Euros per tonne or twice the average market price between 2008 and 2012 ,whichever is higher.

Permits are required in first phase for industrial and energy activities covered, chemicals and waste incinerators are not included in first phase (see Annex I of draft directive for the sectors covered)

Unrestricted access to the market by intermediaries

Banking allowed, but could be limited by individual Member States in first phase

National allocation (for free) in first phase, with provisions for new entrants (unspecificed); harmonized allocation rules by 2008

Possibilty to link with non-EU national emissions trading programs by MOU in first phase (aimed at accession states)

Only CO2 emissions are covered in the first phase, expanded to all GHG gases covered by 2008

Renewable energy certificates are not integrated with GHG allowances under the program

Emissions credits not incorporated into program, but desireable in future.  The EC will address this under a separate directive

I will work with Peter, Nailia, Diana and others to further analyse its implications for Enron.

Link to Draft Emissions Trading Directive:

<http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/climat/com/01581_en.pdf>


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2001 08:44 AM ---------------------------

jim enright <jimenright@yahoo.com> on 04/13/2001 08:10:10 AM
To:	Joseph D Terrell <joes944@sprintmail.com>, mary tomassetti <marytomassetti@hotmail.com>, dennis wilson <Dennis.J.Wilson@hrb.com>, greg mansfield <gregory_mansfield@hotmail.com>, joe gatto <jpgatto@aol.com>, Ken Gold <kengold@lucent.com>, d d anderson <dd139@aol.com>, steve barbuto <Buto101@aol.com>, Marty Eggener <zeggener@execpc.com>, jim biggers <biggerj@mps.bellhowell.com>, commander cody <gfrayne@ix.netcom.com>, mike dawson <ddawson01@earthlink.net>, mark emerick <getty01@aol.com>, marie enright <mariee@sprintmail.com>, nancy enright <enright.nk@pg.com>, tom everding <tcneonmeat@aol.com>, john freund <freundj@hotmail.com>, george fuller <george@summitanalytics.com>, mary gatto <maryz96296@aol.com>, Joanne Gunter <jgunter@att.com>, hal hirsh <hal@summitanalytics.com>, ed hollwedel <edhollwedel@aol.com>, les hutchinson <jayjayhutchinson@aol.com>, vince kaminski <vkamins@ect.enron.com>, cynthia lee <leec5@calbt.com>, cynthia lee <shoupinlee@yahoo.com>, Jamie Mastrio <jamie@youritllc.com>, toby mills <rtmills@swbell.net>, ric mullen <ricmullen@juno.com>, rick mullen <rickmullen@pocketmail.com>, ZBIG NAUMOWICZ <qbszn@aol.com>, susan paulovich <spaulovich@ra-corp.com>, thu pham <cpham@rosenman.com>, kathy pink <kpink@accorto.com>, a robson <angelique16@juno.com>
cc:
Subject:	Fwd: It's Started

Note: forwarded message attached.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
X-Apparently-To: jimenright@yahoo.com via web10002
X-Track: 1: 40
Received: from kcmso1.att.com  (EHLO kcmso1.proxy.att.com) (192.128.133.69)  by mta468.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Apr 2001 17:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhqpf.lga.att.com ([135.67.4.137])	by kcmso1.proxy.att.com (AT&T IPNS/MSO-3.0) with SMTP id f3D07Q721785	for <jimenright@yahoo.com>; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 20:07:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: FROM mailhqpf.lga.att.com BY mailhqpf.lga.att.com ; Thu Apr 12 20:07:25 2001 -0400
Received: by MAILHQPF with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)	id <2VGR0SB6>; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 20:07:25 -0400
Message-ID: <2E952B41828F7846A27375043CDF815001E914A0@lganj0se1.lga.att.com>
From: "Gunter,Joanne C - LGA" <jgunter@att.com>
To: "'Daniel Aragues'" <konadan@cwnet.com>,   "'Frank Udvarhely'"	 <f.udvarhely@worldnet.att.net>,   "'Jim Enright'" <jimenright@yahoo.com>, "'Naomi'" <nlsesq@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: It's Started
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 20:06:05 -0400
Return-Receipt-To: "Gunter,Joanne C - LGA" <jgunter@att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;	boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C0C3AD.B828652C"
Content-Length: 30606

Statement from the U.S. State Department

For eight years China has had its way with the U.S. Now the
"Paper Tiger" is beginning to show teeth and muscle. The days of
tempting to bully the U.S. are to come to an end. The China pilot
was in gross error, and China should apologize to the U.S. for
his reckless behavior. We have this on film. Therefore, the
attached is appropriate.

 <<US_apology.jpg>>

 - US_apology.jpg


LET'S WORK FROM THIS DRAFT.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 04/25/2001
04:40 PM ---------------------------

Jennifer Thome
04/23/2001 05:24 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Final Solutions Memo

Jim:

The attached incorporates Jeff's changes from this morning as well as a
couple additional revisions/clean up (i.e., I added some clarification to the
rate design table per Jeff's suggestion).

I look forward to your additional feedback.

Thanks,

Jennifer
5-3550


Start Date: 4/4/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


**********************************************
*** Make a note: Meridien's Annual Summit Conference will be in Cambridge, MA, on May 20-21, 2002!***

New at Meridien Research for January 17, 2002

1. From Policy to Practice: Privacy Management Solutions
2. XML: Are We Speaking the Same Language?
3. Buy-Side OMS: Several Steps Closer to STP
4. Top Ten Strategic IT Initiatives in Wholesale Financial Services for 2002
5. Top Ten Wholesale for 2002 Web cast

Registered clients can access research directly. If you are a client but are not registered, or if you are a guest, please visit our Web site to register for a user name and a password.
http://www.meridien-research.com/

*********************************************

Latest Findings from Meridien:

1. From Policy to Practice: Privacy Management Solutions
(Customer Relationship Management/Customer Interaction Client Access)
http://www.meridien-research.com/doc.asp?docid=819
This is the third Meridien report in a series that deals with privacy issues worldwide. Advanced technology has made customer data more mobile than ever. Financial institutions analyze, transmit, and store sensitive customer data every day to deliver products and services to their customers in an efficient and effective manner. But technological advancements have also created an environment in which financial institutions can sell customer data to third parties or inadequately protect customer information. Regulators may stipulate which data can be collected and how it can be used, but customers may have their own set of stipulations. It is up to the institution to balance these demands. This report defines privacy management and examines three vendors offering privacy management middleware solutions.

2. XML: Are We Speaking the Same Language?
(Wholesale e-Financial Client Access)
(Emerging Trading Technologies Client Access)
(Retail e-Financial Client Access)
http://www.meridien-research.com/doc.asp?docid=820

Technologists may not be uttering "XML" with quite the battle-cry zeal they did last year, but XML standardization efforts trudge on. XML remains a crucial consideration for organizations as they make their technology decisions. This report updates a previous Meridien report on XML, which focused largely on the business-to-business marketplace arena. Much of the immense market push in that direction has slowed along with the rest of the economy. In the meantime, belt-tightening and budget scrutiny are leading many institutions to pursue internal initiatives that can for now bring them more immediate and assured return on investment than might more outwardly focused, multi-institution efforts. This report updates some of the standardization efforts and provides some new coverage in an effort to shed light on the areas where the financial industry will more than likely focus in the next several years.

3. Buy-Side OMS: Several Steps Closer to STP
(Emerging Trading Technologies Client Access)
http://www.meridien-research.com/doc.asp?docid=823

Order management systems, or OMSs, facilitate the intrafirm processing of securities trading. The growth and acceptance of processing power and networking technologies have allowed OMSs to expand beyond simple order management. This growth has encouraged the centralization of several front-, middle-, and back-office and compliance functionalities into one solution. As straight-through processing becomes more important for firms, an OMS offers a relatively easy and proven way of starting down this road. This report examines the components of an OMS, various vendors providing OMS solutions, the OMS marketplace, and how a buy-side firm uses OMS technology.

4. Top Ten Strategic IT Initiatives in Wholesale Financial Services for 2002
(Guest access)
http://www.meridien-research.com/misc/top10_2002.asp

Meridien Research's third annual IT analysis identifies the top ten initiatives that will have key strategic importance for the wholesale financial services industry in 2002. This special report summarizes and forecasts spending on these initiatives, considering industry segment and geographic region.

5. Top Ten Wholesale for 2002 Web cast
Wednesday, January 30, 2002; 11AM
Presenter: Bill Bradway
(Open to the public)
http://www.meridien-research.com/events/webcast/
This Web cast, based on our recently released report, will identify what Meridien believes will be the top ten initiatives having key strategic importance for the wholesale financial services industry in 2002.

**********************************************************

Meridien Research
2020 Commonwealth Avenue
Newton, Massachusetts 02466
Tel: +1.617.796.2800
Fax: +1.617.796.2850
sales@meridien-research.com

Please do not reply to this e-mail.  If you have a service question, please e-mail custserv@meridien-research.  For sales questions, please e-mail sales@meridien-research.com.

To be removed from our e-mail distribution list, reply to this message with the word REMOVE in the subject line.


Michelle/Sharon,

We would like to get the Legal Department's approval for the letters below
before we load these into Personic.  Our users will be sending these letters
to prospective and/or non-prospective  candidates.  Please let me know.

Thank you in advance,
Nicole Pineda
Personic Production Support
713-853-9121
---------------------- Forwarded by Nicole Pineda/HR/Corp/Enron on 12/04/2000
02:04 PM ---------------------------

Althea Gordon
12/01/2000 05:24 PM
To: shelly.christner@enron.com, nicole.pineda@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Letters for Personics

Here are the letters that need to get approval for Personics on behalf of the
Associate and Analsyt program.  I am  still  looking over the last letter.
Once I have it done I will forward it to you also.  Can you please forward
these to the necessary persons for approval.

Thanks!
Althea


If you didn't get the e-mail I just sent you with a link in it check out the latest www.theonion.com

cd


Not Bad
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Lasater [mailto:randylas@vail.net]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:33 AM
To: Whitt, Mark
Subject: Re: MLS Properties from RANDY A LASATER

Mark,

According to the listing agent, the annual gross income for this unit is $22,800.  This is actual income from the past year. Expect this year to be somewhat less.  Also, a contract has been offered on this property, but not yet accepted.  I'm going over there to take a look today.

Randy

----- Original Message -----
From: Whitt, Mark <mailto:Mark.Whitt@ENRON.com>
To: Randy Lasater <mailto:randylas@vail.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:48 PM
Subject: RE: MLS Properties from RANDY A LASATER

Can you find out wha the average rental income is on one like this?

-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Lasater [mailto:randylas@vail.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:27 PM
To: Paul Lucci
Cc: Mark Whitt
Subject: MLS Properties from RANDY A LASATER

Here's one I ran across. Not huge, but great location(walk to the gondola).  VERY rentable.

Randy

To view these listings, double click on the attached files.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/19/2001 09:24
AM ---------------------------

"O'BRIEN, Lisa" <lisa.obrien@freshfields.com> on 04/18/2001 03:40:34 PM
To: "'ccampbell@kslaw.com'" <ccampbell@kslaw.com>, "'kay.mann@enron.com'"
<kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Salmon Energy:  Escrow Agreement

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.  Thank you for
your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

(Resending)
Attached please find comments to the Escrow Agreement.  Please do not
hesitate to call me or Gregg to discuss these comments.

 - Scanned_.pdf


This has been changed.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/16/2000 01:53 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

460524
dianna

broker has 230.00


I agree. No offer. Let him pursue his claims with everyone else. Michelle
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Pressure to finish my review! My husband is in Indonesia on business, so don't be surprised if I reply in the middle of the night when kids are asleep and I can concentrate
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


And to start off the week.....

California's new State Song! The Rolling Blackout Theme Song
(To the theme music from the TV western "Rawhide")
Rollin', rollin', rollin',
Though the state is golden,
Keep them blackouts rollin', statewide.
A little colder weather,
And we all freeze together,
Wishin' more plants were on the line.
All the things I'm missin',
Like lights and television,
Are waiting 'til we can pay the price.
(Chorus)
Turn 'em on, turn 'em off,
Shut 'em down, block 'em out,
Turn 'em on, turn 'em off, statewide!
Brown 'em out, black 'em out,
Charge 'em more, give 'em less,
Let the pols fix the mess, statewide!
Keep movin', movin', movin',
Though they're disapprovin',
Keep them rates a-movin', statewide.
Don't try to understand 'em,
Just raise, charge, and collect 'em.
Soon we'll be livin' high and wide.
My heart's calculatin',
Nuclear plants will be waitin',
Be waitin' at the end of my ride.
(Chorus)
Turn 'em on, turn 'em off,
Shut 'em down, block 'em out,
Turn 'em on, turn 'em off, statewide!
Brown 'em out, black 'em out,
Charge 'em more, give 'em less,
Let the pols fix the mess, statewide!
STATEWIDE! Hyaah!


I got the message and will handle. Tahnks

Steven J Kean
03/01/2000 11:37 AM
Sent by: Maureen McVicker
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: VOICE MAIL

Joe Sutton called and wants to discuss how the vision groups are going.  Have
they taken place, what are the plans now?  He thinks you should report it to
the Exec Committee the next time you meet, but Joe wants to see the report
first.  I have attached below, the response Mary Clark sent to you regarding
the meetings (in case you want to forward it).  I did not forward this to
Joe.  I wanted to check with you first.

Also, Joe said he spoke with Ken Lay regarding the Annual Report - Ken's
concern about the cover and the Chairman's Award is the fact that the winner
is not pictured on the cover.  The runner ups are there but not the winner
and he thinks the winner should also be in the picture.

EMAIL FROM MARY CLARK:

Steve, I've attached the results of the focus groups as per my notes from the
meetings.  Let me know if you need anything else.


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Daily Energy Letter
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/Energy-Letter1-11-02.pdf


Please read
I'm sure you will be getting some calls.

DS
---------------------- Forwarded by Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron on 05/30/2001 06:33 AM ---------------------------

Rich Jolly
05/29/2001 05:09 PM
To:	Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:	Team Mountainair@ENRON, Team Laguna/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject:	FW: El Paso blow down

Darrell if you will pass this information to our controllers it will be appreciated. We will probably get some call's from the local people.
Thanks
RJ
---------------------- Forwarded by Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron on 05/29/2001 03:52 PM ---------------------------
From:	Dan Maschka/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/29/2001 04:26 PM CDT
To:	Randy Rice/ENRON@enronXgate, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	FW: El Paso blow down

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Don
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 4:12 PM
To:	Maschka, Dan; Toews, John; Wilson, Steve; Cooney, Denny; Ruiz, Norm; Operations Communication Center - Omaha
Subject:	FW: El Paso blow down

FYI everyone

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	David Ferrer/Albuquerque/ET&S/Enron@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-David+20Ferrer_Albuquerque_ET+26S_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:50 PM
To:	Nelson, Don
Subject:	El Paso blow down

On June the 4th at 0600 El Paso Nat Gas is going to blow down a section of their pipeline that is in
the Belen NM area. I'm sure we will be getting some calls, so we thought we would let you know.
If you could also forward this to gas control  it would sure help. Thanks, Mountainair team.