Michelle:
I have confirmed Bob Rosner's availability on October 30 at 9:30 am.  Diane said that she was going to have the Enron Shuttle (Limo?) meet us at the Four Seasons to bring us to the meeting.  We will be waiting for the shuttle at about 9:15. See you then.  By the way, Bob is quoted in today's Wall Street Journal. See below.
Kerry E Notestine
Littler Mendelson, PC
1900 Chevron Tower
1301 McKinney Street
Houston, Texas 77010
713.652.4748
713.951.9212 (fax)
knotestine@littler.com
www.littler.com
-----Original Message-----
From:   Bob Rosner, Retention Evangelist [mailto:rosner@northsound.net ]
Sent:   Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:14 AM
To:     KNotestine@littler.com
Subject:        that will work just fine
 October 17, 2001  Work & Family  <http://interactive.wsj.com/documents/center-WorkFamily.htm > Fumbling in Crisis Has Bruised The Loyalty of Some Employees By SUE SHELLENBARGER
IN HER EIGHT years at a Pennsylvania medical-services company, the marketing manager had been fairly content. Then, in a relative heartbeat -- the three days after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks -- her opinion of her employer did an about-face. The reason: Her bosses fumbled the crisis, the manager says. Though nearly all offices and schools in her city closed early Sept. 11, employees at her firm who had to leave early to pick up children or for other reasons met a snide or grudging response. One senior executive said, "If you really need to, you can," the manager says. Those who stayed but kept one eye on the TV news were criticized for failing to focus. Managers expressed no concern for employees' worries about traveling on business. "I expected much more compassion," says the marketing manager. The experience has her considering jumping ship for another employer, she says. Handling the aftermath of the terrorist attacks posed an acid test for employers, often fundamentally changing the employer-employee relationship. The mass emotions aroused by the tragedy were so primal -- fear, grief, anger and the drive to protect loved ones -- that any managerial missteps took on larger-than-life importance. EMPLOYEES, RIGHTLY or wrongly, believed they were seeing bosses' true colors. Their conclusions about what they saw either deepened their commitment or damaged it beyond repair. "This is a sea change. People are seeing how important basic, trustworthy relationships are," says Frederick Reichheld, a director emeritus of Bain & Co. and author of "Loyalty Rules." Some employers rose to the occasion. Lorna Paine, a sales executive in Houston for Business Objects, a San Jose, Calif., software concern, says her managers, from the chief executive on down, encouraged people "to go home to our families, do whatever you need to do" after the attack. One vice president called Ms. Paine to give her his home number in case she needed anything. "I've been working for almost 20 years. I've never had a vice president give me his home number. Never," she says. "I am committed to this company like never before." At Trane Co., Doug Young, an asset management specialist, says his employer's concern for employees, reflected in frequent e-mails, an outpouring of encouragement and educational materials, and big charitable contributions, deepened his commitment. Calling it his personal "moment of truth," Mr. Young says his employer "provided comfort and made me proud." Others fumbled the ball. At a Chicago consulting firm, a senior supervisor coldly ordered employees on Sept. 11 to return to business as usual, one consultant there says. "What we needed was to stop and say, 'OK, we're going to take a deep breath and think about this,' " she adds. When she weighs long-term plans, "I will remember this situation and how my firm dealt with it." If employees seem a little touchy, they are. As discussed last month in this column, the terrorist crisis knocked millions of workers a rung or two lower on the Maslovian hierarchy of human needs. Now, they're focused on life's most basic requirements, including safety, security and connections with others. These spark far stronger emotions than the higher-level priorities of months past, such as recognition or achievement. VAULT.COM, a Web site that posts message boards on companies, drew about 50 postings from employees protesting their postattack treatment, says Vault Inc.'s Mark Oldman. Hundreds more came from human-resource managers asking for advice. Indeed, several companies found themselves pilloried in the news media for simply following established policies -- for example, requiring employees to account for time off taken Sept. 11. Embedded in the crisis is an opportunity for employers to rebuild damaged loyalty. Fewer than one in four workers are truly loyal to their companies and committed to staying, says Walker Information, a customer- and employee-satisfaction researcher in Indianapolis. That could easily change. In an unusual twist, Walker received an e-mail request from an employee of one of its clients, a telecommunications company, to change the survey she had submitted about her employer. Her company handled the Sept. 11 crisis so well, the employee wrote, that she wanted to express her newfound loyalty. While loyalty may not seem to matter amid hundreds of thousands of layoffs, research suggests it does. Loyalty shapes people's choices not only about where to work, but also about how long, hard and wholeheartedly to apply their mental energies -- the fuel that drives the New Economy. Employee attitudes also color customer relationships. "When the only thing keeping employees on the job is fear, or golden handcuffs, those employees don't go the extra mile," Walker's Mark Drizin says. In a reeling economy, going the extra mile is just what employers need. But they're going to have to show some heart to get there. To lead well in times like these, says Bob Rosner, a speaker on workplace issues and author of "The Boss's Survival Guide," "you have to feel the pain yourself." ? Send e-mail to sue.shellenbarger@wsj.com <mailto:sue.shellenbarger@wsj.com >. To see other recent Work & Family columns, please go to CareerJournal.com <http://www.careerjournal.com/Default.asp >.

                              RETENTION EVANGELIST
 CHECK out Wall Street Journal best-seller The Boss's Survival Guide
  REGISTER for our weekly  'Zine -- VISIT the award-winning web site
   READ our book: Working Wounded -- HEAR us speak: WW lectures
  ASK a work-related question: mailto:bob@workingwounded.com
          WORKING WOUNDED: Advice that adds insight to injury


Subsequent to our swap group meeting with Clement last week, I have discussed
the issue further with Jeff Hodge, Peter Keohane, Russell Diamond and Clem.
In addition to ENA, ECC is feeling the pressure of delays for obtaining
corporate guaranties caused by increased guaranty requests, too few signers
and insufficient legal staffing to handle the volume.

Although Clem will have assistance soon, we concluded that it would be
prudent to begin negotiation of a guaranty immediately rather than wait for
the conclusion of the master agreement (or confirmation) negotiations.
Please try to incorporate this approach, particularly with Canadian
counterparties.

Credit will continue to push our internal form of Enron Corp. guaranty.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


From one of the ARM members below. Our latest info is that there are still 3
votes in SUPPORT of direct access. So, this measure would fail if that
SUPPORT stays in place.  ARM and others plan a campaign to attack this draft
decision.

From Commonwealth:
I have that Linda Serizawa, Commissioner Wood's advisor, has stated that
Commissioner Wood is at this moment drafting the decision on direct access.
She indicated that a draft order would be released, but would not say when.
She stated that ABX1-1 directed the CPUC to set a date at which time a
customer would no longer have the right to switch to an ESP, and indicated
that this order, as it is currently drafted, establishes that date.
Apparently there was great hesitant when making the statement "as it is
presently drafted," indicating to that Wood is getting a lot of pressure not
to set the date.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


Jim,
 I will work on the Transaction Agreement which will go with the Master Sales
Contract.  I just go a voice mail from Credit indicating who was working on
your deal.  I am waiting for a credit worksheet from them so that I can start
on the Contract.  Once the contract is completed, I will prepare the
Transaction Agreement.  I will need to talk with you cause I noted several
omissions in the language.  Under certain conditions, the transporter will
not allow the over supplier to resell the volumes, they may be merely cashed
out.  Do you agree.  What is the Purchase Index?  Is it Inside FERC Henry Hub
first of the month  or is it some other index or is it daily.  Let's
discuss.  I will be here today and next week.  Friday is iffy.

	Jim Homco
	03/22/2001 01:42 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Albany Plant - revised

Dan - made a few changes... also, I have copy of Columbia's
FTS-1 and ITS-1 transport agreements as referenced below.


Hi Evening MBA students:

Thanks for all of your e-mail responses for Round II of registration!

We will review your requests over the next few weeks and will confirm your
Spring 2001 schedules on December 8 (please see my Oct. 27 memo on
registering for classes).

My work hours are typically 11:30-8:30 M-Th and 9-5 on Fridays.  E-mails
are the best so that I can note the date and time of your request and to
keep accurate records.

If you  have something urgent and need to contact me immediately, please
do so by telephone as that is the quickest way to contact me. I can be
reached at (510) 643-0435.  Just leave a message if I'm away from my desk
as I check my phone messages often.

FEE PAYMENTS
Please note that Spring 2001 fees total $10,513.50, split into 5 payments
of $2102.70.  These fees do not include health insurance.  Please disregard
the Spring 2001 Fee Schedule on page 4 on my October 27 memo.

Thanks,
TJ


Loraine sent an allocation for fuel that is not scheduled.   Her schedule has
fuel on days where there was no flow:
Day fuel
5 40
8 15
9 14

Can you let me know if we need to book fuel on this contract and what needs
to be done on days where we have no flow?

We called Loraine and she told us to contact you since you are aware of this.

Thanks


MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
      Power Marketers Working Group

FROM: Jim Steffes, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Bob Reilley, Power Marketers Working Group Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy

DATE: November 26, 2001 RE: EPSA Conference Call Schedule for the Week of
      November 26th
?			TransLink Filing Call November 27th 11:30 AM (EST)
?	Market-Based Rates Call November 30th 1:30 PM (EST)
?
EPSA will not hold our regularly scheduled Regulatory Affairs call this week as discussed on last week's conference call.  EPSA will hold a conference call on EPSA's TransLink filing on Tuesday, November 27th at 11:30 AM (EST).  To access this call, dial 1-800-937-6563.  Ask for the Erin Perrigo/EPSA Call.

EPSA will also hold a conference call on market-based rates on Friday, November 30th at 1:30 PM (EST).  To access this call, dial 1-800-937-6563.  Ask for the Julie Simon/EPSA call.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000
05:58 PM ---------------------------

Shijie Deng <deng@isye.gatech.edu> on 10/16/2000 11:00:46 AM
To: Fernando Alvarado <fernando@lrca.com>, Vince Kaminski
<Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>, "John R. Birge" <jrbirge@northwestern.edu>,
rajesh@lrca.com, crovelli@usgs.gov
cc: Shijie Deng <deng@isye.gatech.edu>
Subject: Re: INFORMS National conference at San Antonio

Hi,

Details of our session info. at the INFORMS conference can be found at the
following link.  It'll be in the afternoon of 11/6 (Monday).

http://www.informs.org/Conf/SanAntonio2000//TALKS/MD29.html

Since we have 5 speakers, I expect each of us will have no more than 20
minutes to present.  Please keep that in mind and e-mail me if you have
any questions.  Please also inform me if there will be any changes.  Look
forward to seeing you all in San Antonio.

Best regards,

Shijie

Shi-Jie Deng
Assistant Professor
School of ISyE
Georgia Institute of Technology

Office Phone: (404) 894-6519
E-mail:       deng@isye.gatech.edu
Home page:    http://www.isye.gatech.edu/~deng


------------------------------------------------------------------------

NEWS RELEASE
FROM THE
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

------------------------------------------------------------------------

For immediate release: December 19, 2001
Contact: Chris Davis - 916-654-4989

Energy Commission Starts Review of
Riverside, Kings County Power Projects
Sacramento - The California Energy Commission today voted to start review of two new power projects proposed for Kings and Riverside Counties.

In two separate votes, the five-member Commission found power plant license applications complete and ready for the Energy Commission staff's comprehensive 12-month review process. The first application is from Duke Energy Avenal, LLC, for a 600-megawatt power plant in the City of Avenal, Kings County. The second is for Calpine's Inland Empire Energy Center, LLC's 670-megawatt project near Perris, in Riverside County.

Avenal Energy Project

The site for Duke's Avenal Energy Project is in the agricultural region of the southwest San Joaquin Valley. The project would be built on 25 acres just south of the Fresno County line, about two miles east of Interstate 5. The site is within the City of Avenal in an area zoned for industrial use. The land is currently irrigated agricultural, as is the surrounding property.

The proposed Avenal power plant project would be a combined-cycle generating plant consisting of two natural gas-fired turbines with heat-recovery steam generators and a General Electric steam turbine. The plant would use a wet cooling tower process, consuming approximately 2,250 acre-feet of water annually. The Kern County Water Agency would provide inland surface cooling water to the plant via the San Luis Canal. Local water would be used as a backup for the system. Electricity from the plant would be connected to the transmission grid through a 7,000-foot transmission line. Natural gas will be supplied to the project by a 7,000-foot, underground pipeline to the PG&E Kettleman Compressor Station.

The Avenal Energy Project will be considered under the Commission's 12-month review process. The Committee that will oversee the review is comprised of Energy Commission Chairman William Keese as Presiding Member, and Commissioner Michal (spelled correctly) Moore as Associate Member.

Information about the Avenal Energy Project is available on the Energy Commission's website at:

www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/avenal/

Inland Empire Energy Center

Inland Empire Energy Center, LLC, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Calpine Corporation. The proposed Inland Empire Energy Center project would be located on a 46-acre parcel in Romoland, six miles west of the City of Hemet. The project is expected to take two years to build at a cost of $325-$400 million.

The plant would consist of two natural gas-fired, combustion turbine generators with heat recovery steam generators, a steam turbine generator and state-of-the-art pollution control equipment. Natural gas would be delivered to the plant through a mile-long, 20-inch pipeline.

The Inland Empire Energy Center will also be considered under the Commission's 12-month process. Energy Commissioner Robert Pernell will serve as Presiding Member of the Committee reviewing the project. Commissioner Michal Moore will serve as Associate Member.

More information on the Inland Empire Energy Center is available on the Energy Commission website at:

www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/inlandempire/

Public involvement is a very important part of the Energy Commission review process. To find out how to participate, call the Energy Commission's Public Adviser, Roberta Mendonca, at 916-654-4489, toll free at 800-822-6228, or by e-mail at: pao@energy.state.ca.us.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

To unsubscribe from this list, please go to:

http://www.energy.ca.gov/listservers/

Or simply send an e-mail to majordomo@energy.ca.gov
and in the body of the e-mail, type in

unsubscribe (name of this list)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Farideh Namjou
Web Development Team
California Energy Commission
916-654-4989

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Kevin,

I found out that we are not close at this point to a corp. contract with Energy Central.  You would need to obtain a singe license user which is as follows:

Daliy Electric News	$191.00 Annually
Daily Gas News		$191.00 Annually
For Both		$382.00 Annually

If you were to sign up this way and we did sign a corp. contract, Energy Central would credit you for the difference.

In the meantime, in response to your question, yes we can help you with this.  The best thing to do is go to http://esource.enron.com  at the top tool bar click on Request a Search.  Enter all of the detail you are looking for, and your timeline and we will be able to fill your request.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.

Thank you

Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hyatt, Kevin
Sent:	Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:58 PM
To:	Kennedy, Susan L.
Subject:	RE: Follow up
Importance:	High

In the meantime, do you guys have access to any gas supply production forcasts for the Rockies and San Juan Basin areas.  I'm looking into developing a new pipeline project and need to verify the gas supply will be there to fill the pipe.  Let me know.
thanks
Kevin Hyatt
x35559

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kennedy, Susan L.
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 4:35 PM
To:	Hyatt, Kevin
Subject:	Follow up

 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>

Kevin,

Just a follow up.  I have put in a request for your Dow Jones User Id and password.  I should have this by tomorrow.  I have left a message for Ben Smith at Energy Central, and once I speak to him, I will let you know.

If there is anything else in the mean time, do not hesitate to call me.

Thank you

Susan
eSource Operations
713/853-9135


Jeff (Rocky) Skilling is not able to attend the football game, but he
appreciates you offering to get him a ticket.  He will, however, be at Elvis'
party Friday night.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com

"woody berry" <boethia@hotmail.com> on 10/02/2000 11:04:52 PM
To: wlhessjr@juno.com, PWM1950@aol.com, jansson@mindspring.com,
rrossell@capital.net, RHarman@Bass-Associates.com, pastorhess@hotmail.com,
mpaul@onramp.net, miller@advlaser.com, mbaddour@msn.com, markpa@gateway.net,
fredinvt@juno.com, dfullert@nmh.org, GOLFNBUD@aol.com,
handshohl@eudoramail.com, hutchathoh@aol.com, jansson@pop.mindspring.com,
JAWALLACE12050@aol.com, jdent@express-news.net, jimfulrich@aol.com,
john_grumbles@berryplastics.com, johnmiller@advlaser.com,
jonejrj@annuityboard.org, jskilli@enron.com, judgegyro@yahoo.com,
CraigD9561@aol.com, chuck.paul@a-closer-look.com,
williamhjordan@mindspring.com, christop@netcomuk.co.uk, bensons3@airmail.net,
akinpa@email.msn.com
cc:

Subject: Last call for tickets

Various Beta Buttheads,
   OK, the deadline is fast approaching.  We're inside two minutes to play
and I need to know the game plan.  As of this day Oct. 2, here's what I have
confirmed in tickets ordered so that we all may sit together at this year's
homecoming game:
Mannino/1, Beek/1, Jordan/1, Artie/1, Wallace/1, Elvis/2, Grumbles/2,
Glass/3, Chuckles/1, J. Miller/2, Shack/1, Space/8 (he's bringing all of
Elzie's living relatives), Hutch/2, Fullerton/2, Coburn/2, Jansson/5 (he's
bringing all of Mom Pinchbeck's living relatives), Rossell/2, and Carl
Hohl/2 (he thinks...not sure because he never was).
    Now, if there are ANY OTHERS, you have about 48 hours because I need to
order these things when I get back in town on the 5th.  So if any of you
reading this want some, give me an email.  Also think about recruiting
others not on my email list that you think might not yet know about all
these plans.
     WE ARE ABSOLUTELY GOING TO ROCK THE NEW STADIUM.  I've already
contacted officer Caffey and he's given us yet another reprieve to behave
any damned way we want to, complete with SMU Secuity protection.

Yours in -kai-
Dro
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Hello All -- unfortunately we have had to reschedule the October 23, 2001
meeting to Friday, November 2, 2001.

Bob and Amy -- could we graciously impose upon Goldman again to see if the
video conferencing facilities might be available on Nov. 2 from 11:00 a.m. -
12:30 p.m. (EST)/10:00 - 11:30 a.m.(Central)

Many thanks! -- Stacy

Stacy Carey
Policy Director
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
600 5th Avenue, 27th Floor
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY  10020
(212) 332-1202 ph
(212) 332-1212 fax
(917) 543-9622 cell
scarey@isda.org

-----Original Message-----
From: Siedenburg, Amy [mailto:amy.siedenburg@gs.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:59 AM
To: 'Stacy Carey'
Cc: Ellis, Steve (Houston)
Subject: RE: ISDA Energy and Developing Products Committee Meeting -
October

the only room available in ny w/ video capability is 32 old slip room 23B1 -
it holds 12 people. thats all i could do
in houston the room is 5c

the call in #s are
Domestic:  1-877-718-6588 -passcode 20952
International:  212-902-0992- Passcode 2-0952

let me know if you need anything else

-----Original Message-----
From: Stacy Carey [mailto:SCAREY@ISDA.ORG]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:58 AM
To: Amy Siedenburg
Subject: RE: ISDA Energy and Developing Products Committee Meeting -
October

Amy -- We should plan on about 15-20 people in each location based on the
July 27 meeting.  We will need a call-in number for domestic and
international, if possible.  -- Many thanks! -- Stacy

-----Original Message-----
From: Siedenburg, Amy [mailto:amy.siedenburg@gs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:59 AM
To: 'Stacy Carey'
Subject: RE: ISDA Energy and Developing Products Committee Meeting -
October

how many people will be attending in ny and in houston
also, will you need a call in #

-----Original Message-----
From: Stacy Carey [mailto:SCAREY@ISDA.ORG]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:22 AM
To: Bob Mancini; Amy Siedenburg
Cc: Bunkin, Steven; Stacy Carey
Subject: RE: ISDA Energy and Developing Products Committee Meeting -
October

thank you -- stacy

-----Original Message-----
From: Mancini, Robert [mailto:robert.mancini@gs.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 7:26 PM
To: 'amy.siedenburg@gs.com'
Cc: Bunkin, Steven; 'scarey@isda.org'
Subject: Fw: ISDA Energy and Developing Products Committee Meeting -
October

Please inquire asap
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Stacy Carey <SCAREY@ISDA.ORG>
To: Bob Mancini <robert.mancini@gs.com>; 'STEVEN BUNKIN'
<steven.bunkin@gs.com>; Amy Siedenburg <amy.siedenburg@gs.com>
Sent: Mon Sep 24 15:01:20 2001
Subject: ISDA Energy and Developing Products Committee Meeting - October

Hello All -- hope everyone is well!  We are thinking of scheduling the next
Energy and Developing Products Committee meeting on October 23 from 10:00 -
Noon and was wondering if your video conferencing facilities might be
available for this meeting in NY and Houston? Many Thanks -- Stacy

Stacy Carey
Policy Director
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
600 5th Avenue, 27th Floor
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY  10020
(212) 332-1202 ph
(212) 332-1212 fax
(917) 543-9622 cell
scarey@isda.org


I think the easiest way is a power of attorney.  I've talked to Deb Korkmas
about it (I hear she's the one to handle such things), and I've asked
Kathleen to identify the most active development entities so that we deal
with as many as possible at once.

As for the expense account, I figure she can just tell Ben to sign her name
to the reports.  ANy other ideas?

Kay

From: Stuart Zisman@ECT on 10/10/2000 10:31 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Signature authority

Does any formal documentation need to be prepared to accomplish this?


Start Date: 12/29/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122919.txt
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.


Louise,

Thanks for your email.  Your list for power and gas products are fine. I
agree we can add products/markets going forward as appropriate.  We also
discussed posting your numbers for crude and products.  I believe we agreed
crude and products would not be part of any volume targets, but that we
would incorporate those products in the first round.  Please provide me a
list for crude and products based on what we offer on HoustonStreet.  Also,
any thoughts on whether you want to take me up on my offer to include your
numbers in Europe (UK, Germany and Scandanavia) and Japan for an additional
10% equity in each of those markets?  The reason I ask is that we are
engaged in liquidity partner discussions right now and your answer might
affect our decisions.  We are on target to go live in Europe this Summer.

As for corporate docs, we are prepared to deliver whatever you need to see
whenever it is appropriate.  Just let me know when you would like them and
I'll arrange to get them to the appropriate individual at Enron.

Regards,
Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Louise.Kitchen@enron.com [mailto:Louise.Kitchen@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 7:19 AM
To: Louise.Kitchen@enron.com
Cc: fgetman@houstonstreet.com; mark.taylor@enron.com;
dave.samuels@enron.com; Andy.Zipper@enron.com
Subject: Re: Follow-up on Friday's meeting

Also Frank I think you'll have to provide a lot of the corporation/equity
documentation.

Thanks

Louise

Louise Kitchen
05/16/2000 06:09 AM

To:   "Frank Getman, HSE" <fgetman@houstonstreet.com> @ ENRON
cc:   "'mark.taylor@enron.com'" <mark.taylor@enron.com>@ENRON,
      "'dave.samuels@enron.com'" <dave.samuels@enron.com>@ENRON, Andy
      Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject:  Re: Follow-up on Friday's meeting  (Document link: Louise
      Kitchen)

I spoke to Mark yesterday and he is moving as fast as possible - it may be
a good idea to start with a detailed term sheet  whilst the fuller document
is in drafting (we will be using external counsel to speed things up).

I looked at your list of products (sent by Kevin) which is a great deal
wider than those we quote.  I think the best qay to proceed would be with a
manageable list from which we build as soon as both parties are happy with
the technology.
I have attached a draft list below (natual gas an power only so far), the
terms would be dependent of their availability.  When do you plan to
introduce financial transactions?

(See attached file: product list.doc)

Due to the time difference this week - the easiest way of contacting me is
email.  I would also suggest we think about setting up a meeting for early
next week to go through the draft.

Regards

Louise

 (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  "Frank Getman, HSE"
 pic04304.pcx) <fgetman@houstonstreet.com>
               05/15/2000 11:19 AM

To:   "'mark.taylor@enron.com'" <mark.taylor@enron.com>
cc:   "'dave.samuels@enron.com'" <dave.samuels@enron.com>, "Louise Kitchen
      (E-mail)" <lkitchen@enron.com>

Subject:  Follow-up on Friday's meeting

Hi Mark,

Thanks for taking time on Friday to participate in our meeting.  I think we
made good progress -- by the end of the day, Louise and I were able to
resolve most, if not all, major items.  Late on Friday, Kevin Sluder from
my
office forwarded to Louise by email a list of the proposed markets on
HoustonStreet for which we would look to receive prices electronically from
EnronOnline.  Louise indicated that you would attempt to have a draft
agreement available late in the day on Monday or Tuesday morning.  I wanted
to confirm this timing so I can make sure I have the appropriate
individuals
on my end ready to turn it around.  I think it is in everyone's interest to
try to push this forward this week.

Please let me know if you need any additional information from
HoustonStreet.

Best regards,
Frank Getman
fgetman@houstonstreet.com


Here's the latest.  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000 11:02
AM ---------------------------

"GEORGE T. LEE" <GTLEE@LLGM.COM> on 07/11/2000 10:49:49 PM
To: <mmcbride@connellfoley.com>, <jbyrnes@dlalaw.com>, <jmills@dlalaw.com>,
<Lfritts@dlalaw.com>, <finley.biggerstaff@enron.com>, <JOE.jure@enron.com>,
<MICHELLE.cash@enron.com>, <Peter.del.Vecchio@enron.com>,
<ROBERT.j.pratel@enron.com>, <RODNEY.malcolm@enron.com>,
<Stuart.Zisman@enron.com>, "ANDREW DAVIS" <ADAVIS@LLGM.COM>, "ANDREW J
FAWBUSH" <AFAWBUSH@LLGM.COM>, "ANN MURRAY" <AMURRAY@LLGM.COM>, "BENJAMIN G.
CLARK" <BGCLARK@LLGM.COM>, "CATHERINE LIN" <CKLIN@LLGM.COM>, "JOHN G
KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>, "JAMES THOMPSON" <JTHOMPSO@LLGM.COM>, "PETER
BAUMGAERTNER" <PBAUMGAE@LLGM.COM>, "PHILIP TINGLE" <PTINGLE@LLGM.COM>,
<Gmahoney@media-general.com>
cc:
Subject: Purchase and Sale Agreement.DOC

  Attached are revised drafts of the Purchase Agreement, one of which has
been marked to show the changes from the July 8 draft that was distributed to
you.  In the interest of time, this draft is being circulated prior to its
review by any one at Enron, and it remains subject to our client's comments.
Please call me at 713-287-2066 or Ben Clark at 713-287-2004 with your
comments at your earliest conveniece.

Sincerely
George T. Lee

This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and it may be protected by the  attorney/client or other priviliges.  This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intentded
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me by
return mail, e-mail or at 713-287-2066.  The unauthorized use, dissemination,
distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments is
prohibited and may be unlawful.  George T. Lee, gtlee@llgm.com.

 - Purchase.DOC
 - Purchas1.DOC


Sami:  Congratulations!!!!!!!!   She's adorable.  Sara

	Sami Arap@ENRON
	08/17/2000 03:08 PM

		 To: Nancy Muchmore/NA/Enron@Enron, Michelle Parks/Corp/Enron@Enron, David S
Reinfeld/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Corbin Barnes/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mary Kimball/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Manuela Arap - Pictures

From "daddy" with love.  "Manu" arrived on July 27 at 22:26pm.


CONGRATULATIONS ON THE CLOSURE OF THE ALAMAC/AIG TRANSACTION!! Fantastic
effort and job well done from beginning to end! I don't remember the other
folks involved on your deal team but I do know this deal would not have
happened had it not been for you three! I remember when we started this last
July (remember the $1 DASH ?!), the hurdles that kept popping up (oh, just a
little bankruptcy proceeding), and the s-l-i-c-k structuring of the entire
transaction. Bought if for $3.5 million, sold it for $26 million, marked an
incremental $5 million on a coal contract, and still have the right to
"broker" another sale and keep 90% of the proceeds ( another $10+ million)!!
Pretty awesome.

This was really a great job by all! Let me know the date of the celebration
dinner!


FYI - just in case.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/09/99 07:22
PM ---------------------------

Barton Clark
12/09/99 07:16 PM
To: Brad Nebergall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Holmes/HOU/ECT@ECT, sean black,
Dao@mv.catalytica-inc.com, Lwb@mv.catalytica-inc.com,
pevans@mv.catalytica-inc.com, Crainey@lockeliddell.com, btaylor@wsgr.com,
Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Berry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
hwendell@mdbe.com, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randy Petersen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Xonon Technology Implementation Agreement and Option Repurchase
Agreement

Attached please find latest versions of the above referenced agreements,
marked to show changes from drafts distributed yesterday. It is my
understanding there are no open commercial issues in the agreements, and the
majority of the reflected changes have been discussed and agreed to by all
parties , subject to their approval of the verbiage, except West LB and the
accountants. The letter of credit and form of parent company guaranty are
expected to be received tomorrow from counsel to CCSI, and I will forward
them along as soon as they are received.If there are any other comments or
questions about the documents please let me know. I'm in all day Friday and
can be reached over the weekend at home 713-266-4715 or work 713-853-6119
(please leave message and number where I can call you back).

Matt and Roger: Please forward the attached to any parties with whom you are
working that are required to review and approve the form of documents not
already reflected in the distribution.  Roger: I received your telephonic
comments and those changes had been made. Thanks for the heads up.


Today, Enron hosted a conference call to give investors a current overview of the company. Here's an update of what we discussed during the call.

We told investors that we're doing everything we can to protect their interests and to regain their confidence. Our focus remains on our credit quality, balance sheet and liquidity, which are essential for our continued success and expansion of our wholesale businesses.

It took more than a few weeks to get where we are today. Here's a snapshot of significant events that led to our current situation:

-- In hindsight, we definitely made some very bad investments in our non-core businesses over the past several years. Those include investments in Azurix, India and Brazil. They have performed far worse that we could have ever imagined when we made these investments;

-- Because of these bad investments, we've become over-leveraged as a company. The negative impact of those investments was exacerbated through the extensive use of debt capital both on and off our balance sheet;

-- We also entered into related party transactions that led to a loss of investor confidence, which has been very damaging;

-- We've been criticized for our lack of transparency and our hard-to-understand financial and operating disclosures; and

-- On top of it all, we discovered errors in our financial statements, as discussed in our 8-K filing last week, that required a restatement of previously reported earnings.

We've taken a new look at our businesses and have separated them into three areas: core businesses, non-core businesses, and businesses under review.

Core Businesses

Our core businesses remain strong and consistent sources of significant earnings and cash flows for the company. They're our competitive advantage. These include:

-- Natural gas pipeline businesses;

-- Gas and power businesses in North America and Europe;

-- Retail businesses in North America and Europe; and

-- Coal businesses in North America and Europe.

The events of the past few weeks have had a temporary negative impact on our projected fourth quarter profitability. It's too early to tell at this time what impact this might have on our operating results. We are considering these actions now so that we can quickly return to normal business in 2002.

I also remain optimistic that the actions we've taken over the past couple of weeks have addressed our customer and counterparty credit and liquidity concerns. According to our business unit leaders, we have definitely seen improvement in our counterparty relationships.

Non-Core Businesses

Our non-core businesses include our global assets group and our broadband division. We have invested more than $8 billion in these businesses, and the return from them has been dismal.

We have an aggressive program in place to exit these businesses and expect that the sale of these businesses will generate billions of dollars in cash that we can use to repay debt and reinvest in our core businesses. We already have more than $800 million in assets contracted for sale this year. They include CEG Rio, a gas LDC in Brazil; EcoElectrica, a power plant and LNG receiving terminal in Puerto Rico; and asset sales of offshore oil and gas properties in India. The approximately $2.9 billion Portland General sale is also on target to close in late 2002 pending regulatory approvals.

Businesses Under Review

These businesses are comprised of those operations outside our power and gas wholesale businesses and include global and industrial markets. While several of these businesses have very strong future prospects, we need to determine if their capital requirements and near-term growth prospects are sufficient enough in terms of earnings and cash generation.

Reviewing our businesses this way will help determine where we need to make reductions to our work force. More information will follow as soon as it becomes available.

Credit Rating/10-Q Filing

We continue to meet regularly with credit rating agencies and believe that our liquidity enhancements and scheduled asset sales will strengthen our balance sheet and maintain our investment grade credit rating. Our current credit ratings by the three major rating agencies are as follows:

-- Moody's at Baa3       "Under Review for Further Downgrade"

-- Fitch at BBB-             "Evolving Status"

-- S&P at BBB-              "CreditWatch Negative"

We also discussed our existing financial vehicles, including Osprey, Marlin and Yosemite, in further detail. We told investors that we will file our 10-Q five days late due to our current activities. It will be filed on Nov. 19.

We will continue to have updates with investors over the coming weeks as well as our frequent updates with you. The full transcript of our conference call will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the next few days. It will also be posted on our web site at www.enron.com/corp/investors under "SEC Filings."

In connection with the proposed transactions, Dynegy and Enron will file a joint proxy statement/prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors and security holders are urged to carefully read the joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding the proposed transactions when it becomes available, because it will contain important information. Investors and security holders may obtain a free copy of the joint proxy statement/prospectus (when it is available) and other documents containing information about Dynegy and Enron, without charge, at the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov. Copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus and the SEC filings that will be incorporated by reference in the joint proxy statement/prospectus may also be obtained for free by directing a request to either: Investor Relations, Dynegy Inc., 1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 507-6466, Fax: (713) 767-6652; or Investor Relations, Enron Corp., Enron Building, 1400 Smith Street, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 853-3956, Fax: (713) 646-3302.

In addition, the identity of the persons who, under SEC rules, may be considered "participants in the solicitation" of Dynegy and Enron shareholders in connection with the proposed transactions, and any description of their direct or indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, are available in an SEC filing under Schedule 14A made by each of Dynegy and Enron.


forget the earlier message.  this is it
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/14/2000 03:25 PM -----

	"Rosenblum, Gary(CICG-GEDNY)" <grosenbl@exchange.ml.com>
	06/14/2000 03:18 PM

		 To: "'sara.shackleton@enron.com'" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Confidentiality

 - Doc5__.doc


This is an example of a description from a contract in which we purchased DERC's from Dow Chemical:

The NOX DERC's reflect reductions of NOX emissions resulting from the 1995 shutdown of Boilers 1&2 at Seller's LHC-7 facility located in Freeport, Texas (the "LHC-7 Facility").

Could you provide something more descriptive, along those lines -- thanks, Bob
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Michael E
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 5:00 PM
To:	Bruce, Robert
Subject:	RE: HGA rule

Enron Methanol Plant

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bruce, Robert
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:58 PM
To:	Taylor, Michael E
Subject:	RE: HGA rule

thanks

what is the particular EOTT facility that the reductions will relate to?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Michael E
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:19 PM
To:	Woods, Trevor; Bruce, Robert; Massey II, John
Subject:	HGA rule

c) The owner or operator of a site receiving allowances on an annual basis may permanently sell those rights to any person. This request for transfer of ownership shall be completed by the executive director following the submission of a completed ECT-4 Form, Application for Permanent Transfer of Allowance Ownership. The executive director will issue a letter to the purchaser and seller reflecting this transaction. The transaction will be considered finalized upon issuance of this letter.

The above is from Title 30, Part 1, CH 101, Subchapter H, Division 3, Rule 101.356 (Texas Administrative Code)

Michael Taylor


---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron on 05/31/2001 06:43 PM ---------------------------

Amy Mulligan
04/30/2001 10:52 AM
To:	Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Albert Hernandez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Amy_Mulligan@enron.com, Cynthia Rivers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Minter/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Linda Ward/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Beverly Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine McEvoy/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	Transwestern Invoicing

I have attached a spreadsheet that Elizabeth put together for us for our February invoicing so you can get an idea of the categories and the number of invoices.

These are the 7 categories Elizabeth checks, and how they can be redistributed:

Void Invoices: There are only two of these invoices each month, MSR's can check these, but Marketing will have to communicate when there are additional Invoices that need to be voided.
Delete Line Items: This can also be checked by MSR's but new contracts with these exceptions need to be explained by Marketing to the corresponding MSR for that customer
Volume Adjust: These are also only for exceptional contracts, MSR's can check these exceptions, but Marketing will have to explain exceptions on New Contracts to the corresponding MSR for that customer.
Make-up Volume: MSR's
Adjust Reservation Invoices for change in Credit for Commodity due to make-up: MSR's
Adjust Rate: Marketing
Regenerate Invoice: MSR's

We will start checking these for May Accounting,
The TW Team


I agree that we should not move the business at this time, but we do need cross-training to occur.  Eventually the business should come here to Houston.  The decision was made to bring the physical trading business to the Houston office and I do not believe that that task has been completed.  My feelings are for continuity that all operations involving trading and scheduling of physical gas should move here under your firm control and direction.  I also think that some of our counterparties are confused as to who to call concerning these types of deals and that trading decisions are being made in Denver without our knowledge until after the fact.  This is something that I have heard from you and Barry that should not be happening.

I would still like to go to Denver for the cross-training to occur and we can determine the eventual placement of these operations after things calm down.

Jay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:36 PM
To:	Reitmeyer, Jay
Subject:	Denver

In light of the current circumstances with the company and the concerns that our counterparties have at this time, I would like to leave the upstream business in Denver.  Moving this business would lead to confusion with our customers and to our Denver based employees.  Let me know if you have any issues with this.

If you would like to go up there for coordination and training, then feel free to travel to Denver.

Thanks,
Grigsby


Thursday PM would be ok.  Would you set it up please?

Mary Ellenberger@ENRON
01/16/2001 05:13 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 4/00 Columbia Energy Service O/A Schedule

I'm for that.
Melba
Lisa V.
Priscilla Hamic
Pam Boxx
and anyone else who will using the information.
What about Thursday? Tomorrow is physical gas O/A Phase II
A.M. or P.M. you make the call.
Mary Ellenberger

Chris Germany@ECT
01/16/2001 04:47 PM
To: Mary Ellenberger/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 4/00 Columbia Energy Service O/A Schedule

Could we meet to go over this?  AND are there any other folks we should
invite?


-----Original Message-----
From: Giles, Valerie
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 6:40 PM
To: Geaccone, Tracy
Cc: Mengis, Chick; Farris, Christine; Stevens, Kirk
Subject: PGE Incentive

Tracy,

Amount of 2000 bonus' paid in 2001:  $16.74M
(The $16.61M reported by PGE employee Joyce Bell in HR was the recommended amount submitted to Corporate for approval.  The actual payouts differ by $130K due to upward adjustments made by Corporate to the recommended amounts.)

Accrual amount for 2001 bonus:  $13.0M

Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks, Valerie


why would they{nng guys} do that? I take it you haven't visited with Stan lately.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corman, Shelley
Sent:	Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:04 PM
To:	Hayes, Robert
Subject:	RE:

Yes.  Of course I'm still here.  I think my NNG friends are spreading the rumor that I'm out of here!  But, I just keep busy with my day to day work and try to put of making any decisions...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayes, Robert
Sent:	Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:43 PM
To:	Corman, Shelley
Subject:

Are you still here?  Haven't seen or heard from you in a couple of days.  Hope you weren't upset at me for digging you about the TV
appearance.  Did you  meet with Deb?
                                                                                Bob


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 06:40
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
12/06/2000 06:36 PM
To: theherington@bracepatt.com
cc:

Subject: Westinghouse 501D5A damaged generator

Hi.

You probably thought that I feel off the end of the world.  Please take a
look at this and give me a call.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 06:34
PM ---------------------------

Scott Laidlaw@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/06/2000 03:41 PM
To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris
Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Dan Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matthew
Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank R
Cervenka/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Westinghouse 501D5A damaged generator

john - thanx for your time on phone this afternoon.

a) just received cc of letter from westinghouse.  in it, they assert that:

"title to the existing generator passed to enron upon delivery into the
united states.  delivery occurred at houston on or about 23jul00.  as
required by the contract and incoterms 1990, risk of loss to the generator
passed to enron when the generator arrived (ddp) at houston while the
generator remained on board the common carrier.  the generator was delivered
in an undamaged condition.  title and risk of loss passed to enron before the
water damage to the generator occurred."

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

b) per the contract between enron and westinghouse:

section 15.1.2 title to Equipment - Title to the Equipment will pass to
Purchaser immediately upon entry into the united states.
section 15.2 risk of loss - Seller shall bear the risk of loss and damage
with respect to the Equipment until delivery of the Equipment to the Delivery
Point in accordance with Section 3.2.1.  Seller shall be required to inspect
the Equipment for damage at the Delivery Point.
section 3.2.1 - Seller shall cause the Equipment to be delivered to the
Delivery Point on a DDP basis in accordance with Sections 10.2.1 by the date
set forth therein.
section 3.2.2 - Seller shall be responsible for delivering the CT-Unit DDP to
the: (iii) u.s. port of export by any means of transport.
section 3.2.3 - Seller shall perform customs clearance for the Equipment
through u.s. customs and pay any import duties.
section 10.2.1 Guaranteed Unit Delivery Date - Seller will cause the CT-Unit
(author's note - includes the generator) to be delivered in an undamaged
condition in accordance with the Specification-CT to the Delivery Point (DDP)
in accordance with Schedule I below (the Guaranteed Unit Delivery Date).
(author's note - the date specified in the contract was later slipped per
agreement with enron).
section 10.2.3 Completion of Delivery - delivery of the CT-Unit to the
Delivery Point shall be considered complete for the purposes of Delivery
Liquidated Damages as it pertains to the delivery of Major Components
(author's note - includes the GT and generator) when the last Major Component
of such CT-Unit is delivered DDP to the Delivery Point in complete and
undamaged condition.  ...  Purchaser shall have the right to inspect the
Equipment for condition of the Equipment upon actual delivery.  Purchaser
reserves the right to reject damaged Equipment at any location; however, in
the event a portion of the Equipment is damaged or defective upon delivery to
the Delivery Point, Purchaser after making an initial assessment of the
damage or defect and consulting with Seller as to how such damage will affect
the installation , operation, performance, reliability, efficiency, and
warranty of the damaged Equipment may either:
(i) reasonable determine that such damage or defect is such that the
preceding criteria is so adversely affected that Purchaser cannot accept
delivery of the damaged Equipment and declare that delivery has not occurred,
or
(ii) after taking into account such criteria and Seller's proposed plan for
correcting such damage or defect in accordance with Section 9.5, declare that
delivery has occurred: in the event Purchaser discovers such a damage or
defect, it shall notify Seller of such as soon as practical.

c) facts of the case, as we know them:

common carrier ship carrying the generator supposedly arrived in port of
houston approx. 14jul00.  i.e., that was the ship's estimated time of arrival
(eta).
westinghouse is claiming that delivery occurred on or about 23jul00.
enron representative (frank cervenka) went to CTSS (i.e., the westinghouse
facility here in houston) on friday, 21jul00 to inspect the combustion
turbine.  during that inspection, westinghouse employees informed him that
the generator had salt water damage at the port.  as a result, the following
monday, 24jul00, he visited the port of houston with the siemens-westinghouse
insurance adjustor and saw the damaged generator.  note - this was just a
cursory visit to verify that in fact the unit had been damaged.  the full
extent of the damage and impact on the project was not known at that time -
e.g., repair or replace were still viable options.
enron received formal notification (faxed letter) of the damaged generator on
approx. 18aug00.
enron has already made progress payments to siemens-westinghouse in the
amount of 95% of the contract value of the gas turbine and generator.
DDP, per incoterms 1990, means delivered duty paid.
Westinghouse, despite 2 prior requests from enron, has not provided copies of
the customs clearance documentation.  i.e., we don't know the exact date that
the generator cleared customs, or if it cleared customs.
title means ownership, but does not imply either risk of loss or care,
custody, and control.  with title comes both ownership and the responsibility
for payment of taxes.

d) info not known by enron:

when did ship come into port?
when did damage to generator occur?
when, or if, u.s. customs duties were paid?

f) info known by enron:

generator is a total loss, as determined by westinghouse.
per section 10.2.3 of contract, enron was not given the formal opportunity to
inspect the damaged generator until a month after it arrived in port.  as
recalled by matt tezyk, westinghouse was then advised by enron in writing
that the generator was rejected and that delivery had not occurred.
(author's note - matt to find cc of that letter).

g) enron's assertions are that:

DDP was not satisfied.  i.e., delivery of the generator did not occur in
accordance with the terms of the contract.
title (i.e., ownership) remains with siemens-westinghouse.
risk of loss remains with siemens-westinghouse.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

john - plz assess the copy of the contract provided to you this afternoon
under separate cover.  we request a legal opinion as to whether delivery, in
accordance with the contract, of the CT-Unit occurred or not.  plz call with
any questions.  regards.  scott.


The good news here is that hearings are scheduled to begin next month, which should give us time to sell the retail book.---sch

Posted at 12:59 p.m. PST Tuesday, Dec. 11, 2001
PUC opens Enron probe
CONTRA COSTA TIMES
State regulators opened an investigation Tuesday to determine how the collapse of Enron might affect electricity supplies in California.
The California Public Utilities Commission said it wanted to guard against possible price increases or operational problems that could arise.
"Enron's sudden financial collapse and ensuing bankruptcy raise a number of concerns," said PUC commissioner Carl Wood.
Enron, once the shining star of fans of energy deregulation, began a free-fall last month after revelations about its accounting practices led investors to lose confidence in the company. It filed for bankruptcy on Dec. 2.
The company had been a big player in the energy trading markets, but generates no electricity of its own in California.
The PUC on Tuesday began asking electric utilities and state electricity officials about how Enron's collapse might affect the state's energy market.
Hearings are scheduled to begin next month.


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000 04:08
PM ---------------------------

Kristin Walsh
11/03/2000 03:37 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Ex weather employees

FYI - former Enron employees Jeffrey Bortniker and Lynda Clemmons are the new
Chief Executive Officer and President/Chief Operating Officer (respectively)
for Element Re, a new unit of XL Capital Ltd..  The company will provide
weather risk management insurance, reinsurance and financial products.
Please let me know if you have any questions or would like us to look into
this further.
(first announced September 25th)

Thanks,

Kristin


Message Description: Intraday1 and Timely Deadline Extension

Message Date:	11/09/2001

Message Text:

Intraday1 and Timely Deadline Extension

PG&E has extended the Intraday deadline to 09:30 AM for gas day 11/09/2001, and theTimely deadline to 10:30 AM for gas day 11/10/2001.

Please call the Scheduling Hotline (800) 343-4743 if you have any questions.

Gas Schedulers
PG&E - California Gas Transmission


I have now spoken with the following people in doing further due diligence:

	1.  Theresa Bushman.  Theresa tells me that she shares the view with Mariner's GC that it would be helpful to have F&J continue to represent Mariner for the time being, given F&J's knowledge of Mariner's corporate history.  Theresa, if I have mischaracterized what you told me, please respond.

	2.   Kelly Zelacovitz, Mariner's GC.  Kelly advised me recently that she has a new corporate matter of some urgency that she wants to retain F&J to handle, subject to your approval.  Kelly told me that she would be contacting you about this.

	3.   Prof. John Dzienkowski of the University School of Law.   John has given me his informal thoughts over the telephone on the ethical issues, based on hypotheticals I presented to him; of course, these are not to be taken as recommendations.  In a nutshell, John thinks it would be problematic for a law firm to unilaterally withdraw from the representation of a corporate client solely and only to be able to take on more business potentially adverse to that client in the future.  John thinks it might be appropriate to ask for a disgorgement of fees paid under these circumstances.

	4.  Uriel Dutton.  Dutton says that with an appropriate waiver letter, F&J would be willing to continue its representation of Enron and the Enron subsidiaries, including Mariner and the proposed new Mariner matter, conditioned on the following:

	a.  F&J could not continue to represent Corp. on  one of the three IP matters, which is the nonprovisional patent application (although Dutton was not specific, I believe F&J lists it as the "Method and System for the Determination of VAR").

	b.  F&J would continue to represent Corp. on the six or so abestosis matters in order to try and get Corp. dismissed, but with the understanding that if dismissal was not available, that new representation would be obtained by Corp. before trial.

	c.  Dutton will be sending over a draft proposed waiver letter for our consideration.   We told Dutton that we anticipated getting back to him on this matter early next week.  Although Dutton will be out of the office next week, he will be reachable by cell phone.

	Proposed going forward strategy:

	Chuck and I suggest that if an acceptable waiver letter can be fashioned, that we proceed with proposal offered by F&J.  We invite comments.

	Britt


No one has said anything to me about closing next week.  Lee Johnson is on
vacation next week also, so GE won't be around.

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 12/22/2000 09:44:20 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Cobb, Chris" <chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: RE: Exhibit B-1 to Electrobolt Exhibits

Do we have the anticipated closing date for the LV Cogen deal?  I wasn't
planning on returning to the office until January 3.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 10:19 AM
To: Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com
Cc: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: RE: Exhibit B-1 to Electrobolt Exhibits

EECC may have this.  Can you check with whoever your team is working
with,
or do you want a copy job of what was in the master agreement?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/22/2000
09:17
AM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 12/22/2000 08:36:30 AM

To:   <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   <Alan.Larsen@enron.com>, <Bill.Williams@enron.com>,
      <Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com>

Subject:  RE: Exhibit B-1 to Electrobolt Exhibits

Exhibit B-1 was not in the electronic version of the West LB Agreement.
Do you have an electronic version of this?  If not, can we get a copy
from Lee?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com [mailto:Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 7:52 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Cc: Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com; Alan.Larsen@enron.com; kay.mann@enron.com;
Bill.Williams@enron.com
Subject: Re: Exhibit B-1 to Electrobolt Exhibits

For Las Vegas the West LB exhibit is the appropriate Exhibit.

 (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  "Thompson, Peter J."
 pic16541.pcx) <peterthompson@akllp.com>
               12/21/2000 09:48 AM

To:   "Dale Rasmussen (E-mail)" <Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com>, "Alan.
Larsen
      (E-mail)" <Alan.Larsen@enron.com>
cc:   "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
Subject:  Exhibit B-1 to Electrobolt Exhibits

For the Enron South America and CA Development deals, we have used the
attached Exhibit B-1 (with all changes accepted).  Should this also be
used for the other deals as well or should we use the B-1 from the West
LB Agreement?

-----Original Message-----
From: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com [mailto:lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 6:16 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com; lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com
Cc: Thompson, Peter J.; john.r.ayres@enron.com;
kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com; Cheryl.Lipshutz@enron.com;
roseann.engeldorf@enron.com; Brett.R.Wiggs@enron.com;
Ben.Jacoby@enron.com; Pipitone, Paul; Taylor, Rob; Cobb, Chris;
michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com
Subject: RE: Exhibits to Enron South America Gas Turbine
PurchaseAgreemen t

Kay,

I had a copy of the last redline for Exhibit B-1.  Don't have execution
copy.

On Exhibit h-2, Training -- I'll look for it, but think Kathy had it
last to
identify it as H-2.

Thanks,

Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 3:49 PM
To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com
Cc: peterthompson@akllp.com; kay.mann@enron.com; john.r.ayres@enron.com;
kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com; Cheryl.Lipshutz@enron.com;
roseann.engeldorf@enron.com; Brett.R.Wiggs@enron.com;
Ben.Jacoby@enron.com; paulpipitone@akllp.com; robtaylor@akllp.com;
chriscobb@akllp.com; michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com
Subject: RE: Exhibits to Enron South America Gas Turbine Purchase
Agreemen t

Lee (and others),

Exhibit B is the EECC spec, right? I do not know if I have an electronic
version.  If locating it is a problem, we can copy what we have unless
there is some reason to handle it otherwise.

Exhibit H-2 is the S & S training program dated 2/3/00.  Lee/Mike, do
you
have more copies of that document that we can attach?

Kay

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 12/11/2000 03:15:31 PM

To:   lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com, peterthompson@akllp.com,
      kay.mann@enron.com, john.r.ayres@enron.com
cc:   kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, Cheryl.Lipshutz@enron.com,
      roseann.engeldorf@enron.com, Brett.R.Wiggs@enron.com,
      Ben.Jacoby@enron.com, paulpipitone@akllp.com, robtaylor@akllp.com,
      chriscobb@akllp.com, michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com

Subject:  RE: Exhibits to Enron South America Gas Turbine Purchase
Agreemen
      t

Folks,

John Ayres and I went through the Facility Agreement and Exhibits for
the
ESA Turbine Purchase Agreement.  There were a few edits needed on
Guarantee
Basis (F-1) and Scope of Supply Exhibits (B and N-2).  Also, one change
to
the Emissions Test Exhibit.

John and I believe other than adding in the other Exhibits B-1 and H-2,
this
is ready for execution copy.  Kay, please add these in for the final
circulation.

Also, on the contract, a number of redlines were required to reflect
scope
of supply (addition of interconnect piping to cooling tower, unit
liability
amount, payment schedule adjustment and retention amount, guaranteed
performance levels net of all GE supplied equipment aux. loads,
guaranteed
delivery schedule for purchased options.

This should be ready to go, subject to a final review of the entire
contract
document.

Regards,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 11:15 AM
To: 'Thompson, Peter J.'; Kay Mann (E-mail); 'john.r.ayres@enron.com'
Cc: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP); Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE); Cheryl. Lipshutz
(E-mail); Roseann Engeldorf (E-mail); Brett. R. Wiggs (E-mail); Ben.
Jacoby (E-mail); Pipitone, Paul; Taylor, Rob; Cobb, Chris
Subject: RE: Exhibits to Enron South America Gas Turbine Purchase
Agreement

Kay,

I edited the Termination Schedule replacing the term Purchase Amount per
unit to Unit Liability Amount for consistency with the new structure.

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Peter J. [mailto:peterthompson@akllp.com]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 10:30 AM
To: Kay Mann (E-mail)
Cc: Lee. Johnson (E-mail); Kent. Shoemaker (E-mail); Cheryl. Lipshutz
(E-mail); Roseann Engeldorf (E-mail); Brett. R. Wiggs (E-mail); Ben.
Jacoby (E-mail); Pipitone, Paul; Taylor, Rob; Cobb, Chris
Subject: Exhibits to Enron South America Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement

 <<Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - without notations.DOC>>

This is the most recent draft of the exhibits.

The following items need to be added to complete the exhibits:

1.   Exhibits B-1 and H-2 need to be added.

2.   If one is warranted, a Seller Parent Guarantee should be
included as Exhibit C-1.

3.   Does Exhibit F need to be updated and revised before signing?

4.   In Section 3.1 of Exhibit K, the terms "Specific Date" and
"Recovery Schedule" are not defined.

5.   For Exhibit T, please confirm that Enron has received all
documents that it should have received by now.

(See attached file: Enron South America Turbine Agreement (version 4 to
5)
_GEredline121100.DOC)
(See attached file: Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - without
notations_GEredline121100.DOC)

(See attached file: SS_Final Exhibit B-1(rev 4)_ENRONCOMMENTS_R2.doc)


Noah Bardach
135 San Benito Rd.
Brisbane, CA 94005
noah@stentor.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Noah Bardach


Attached is a PIRA Special Release entitled "Gas Flash: Strong Supply Growth
Indicated."

If you have any questions regarding the report's content, please contact:
Greg Shuttlesworth (email: greg@pira.com), Tom Howard (email:
tazh@pira.com), Richard Redash (email: Rich@pira.com), Nobu Tarui (email:
nobuo@pira.com) or Jane Hsu (email: jane@pira.com), at (212) 686-6808.

Contact John Graziano regarding PIRA report distribution and address changes
at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com.

NOTE: Circulation of the "Gas Flash Weekly" outside a Client's licensed
distribution area is strictly prohibited. Clients that are unsure of their
licensed distribution or require an extension of their current license
should contact their PIRA sales representative, or email to sales@pira.com.

PIRA Energy Group

 - agaspec043001.pdf


Haha - definitely not!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thode, Eric
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 10:14 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: Fortune

You mean I can't put it in the EnTouch!  It isn't cross company, so it doesn't require approval.

Eric

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 10:00 AM
To:	Thode, Eric
Subject:	RE: Fortune

Let's hope no-one else notices.  Let's make sure no-one does anything internally so people notice it.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thode, Eric
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 9:40 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Fortune

Here's the Fortune link...

http://www.fortune.com/indexw.jhtml?channel=list.jhtml&list_frag=list_5columns_powerwomen.jhtml&list=22&_requestid=3612


<<Review of Enron North America Corp. ISDA Schedule>> Your message

  To:      pla@marval.com.ar
  Cc:      Brent Hendry; Susan Bailey
  Subject: Review of Enron North America Corp. ISDA Schedule
  Sent:    Fri, 3 Sep 1999 18:49:43 -0300

was delivered to the following recipient(s):

LOPEZ AUFRANC, Patricia on Fri, 3 Sep 1999 18:47:56 -0300

Message-ID: <862567E1.00779A3F.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
From: Sara Shackleton <sshackl@ect.enron.com>
To: pla@marval.com.ar
Cc: Brent Hendry <"Brent Hendry.ENRON_DEVELOPMENT"@ect.enron.com>,  Susan
Bailey <sbaile2@ect.enron.com>
Subject: Review of Enron North America Corp. ISDA Schedule
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 18:49:43 -0300
Return-Receipt-To: Sara Shackleton <sshackl@ect.enron.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"


I am pleased to announce the following changes in the Global Risk Management Operations organization:

Bob Hall will lead operations for Enron Americas. Bob previously served as one of the business controllers for gas operations for Enron Americas, with direct responsibility for Gas Logistics and Volume Management.  The leadership team reporting to Bob will include Peggy Hedstrom (Calgary Operations), Jeff Gossett ( U.S. Gas Risk and South America Operations), Stacey White (U.S. Power Risk), Leslie Reeves (U.S. Gas and Power Confirmations and Settlements), and Bob Superty (U.S. Gas Logistics).

Brent Price will continue to lead Operations for Enron Global Markets and fulfill his dual role as Chief Accounting Officer for Enron Global Markets.

I am very pleased to announce that Kevin Sweeney will lead Operations for Enron Industrial Markets.  Kevin brings to his new role extensive risk and operations experience from stints in our Houston, London and Singapore offices.  Kevin fills the role that was previously held by Brenda Herod, who will now report directly to Beth Apollo.

Beth Apollo will be the Operations Project Manager for the assimilation of EES Wholesale. This will include Deal Capture, Risk Analysis,  Confirmations, and Global Data functions which have been moved into EWS under Global Risk Management Operations.  Successfully leveraging the infrastructure to support the EES business plan will also require close coordination with Gas Logistics, Settlements and the Operational Analysis (OA) process, and Beth will actively coordinate operations efforts with these teams and the commercial teams.  I have asked Beth to project manage the effort to look for opportunities to streamline and improve systems, processes and controls, and to consider alignment, where it makes sense, with existing EWS processes.  Reporting to Beth will be Scott Mills, with a focus on Deal Capture, Risk Analysis and Confirmations, and  Brenda Herod, with a focus on invoicing control guidelines and reporting requirements.

Beth will also continue to manage the Global Services function, which includes the consolidated DPR process and Global Operations Standards, led by Shona Wilson, and the Global Data function which is lead by James Scribner.

Mike Jordan will continue to lead operations for Enron Europe, working closely with me and other EWS operations leads to insure the proliferation of best operational practices worldwide for Enron.

Thanks for your continued support especially in exploring and seizing commercial opportunities to strengthen our contributions to Enron.


Elizabeth,
For various reasons, and from time to time,  these new RTO-type things come
to legal because we presumably have some special "corporate law" expertise
about board compostition and by-laws.  I'm not sure we do, but in any event,
Steve and I have reviewed this three inch pile of paper and our conclusions
are set forth below.  If you would like us to do anything further, please let
us know. ----cgy
---------------------- Forwarded by Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
02:11 PM ---------------------------

Steve C Hall
11/30/2000 05:17 PM
To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Western Connection Interface (WIO)

Christian,

Earlier this week you asked me to review a stack of documents (proposals and
draft bylaws) relating to the proposed Western Interconnection Organization.

Conclusion:  Based upon a quick review of the draft proposal, bylaws, and
other materials, I see no major objections to Enron voting for the formation
of the WIO.   The reason to vote for this organization would be to facilitate
the development of uniform reliability standards and efficient electric
markets in the Western Interconnection.  However, you should carefully
consider the fact that the board of directors will be weighted towards
transmission owners (who will have 8 of the 27 votes).  Power marketers,
generators, and load-serving entities will only have 4 votes.  14 directors
establish a quorum and the board only requires a majority vote of directors
present, so it is conceivable that, for example, 15 directors show up, 8 of
which are transmission owners, and the transmission owners are able to pass
any resoultion they wish.  Related to this issue is the inability of one
membership group, such as the power marketer's group, to be able to veto a
proposal.  It will take three membership classes acting in unison, plus two
other votes, to defeat a proposed action by the board.  Unfortunately,
because I am not personally familiar with the internal dynamics of the WSCC
membership, I am unable to offer any indication of the how much of a risk
this presents.

       Background and Overview
In General:  The Western Interconnection Organization ("WIO") will be formed
by consolidating the Western Regional Transmission Association, the
Southwestern Regional Transmission Association, the Northwestern Regional
Transmission Association, and the Western States Coordinating Council (WRTA,
SWRTA, NRTA, and WSCC, respectively) into one organization.  The WIO, a
non-profit corporation, will assume and perform the functions of these
organizations, and, eventually, those organizations will be disbanded.

The principal responsibilities of the WIO will be as follows:

 *The WIO will be the primary authority for promulgating regional
reliability, operating, and procedural standards.
 *The WIO will work to resolve conflicting regional reliability standards,
and work to develop compatible and efficient practices throughout the Western
Interconnection.
 *The WIO will have no authority over commercial practices (but may work to
promote compatible, efficient markets).
 *Provide a process for resolving disputes arising out of WIO functions and
between WIO members.

Membership:

Any entity meeting the criteria for membership in one of the following
membership classes may be Member of the WIO.  There are five classes of
membership:  (1) Business entities owning more than 1000 miles of
transmission lines, (2) Business entities owning less than 1000 miles of
transmission lines; (3) Business entities that do not own, control, or
operate transmission or distribution lines, e.g., power marketers,
load-serving entities, independent power producers; (4) End users of
electricity; and (5) Representatives of States and Provinces in the Western
Interconnection.

 *Each class elects four (4) directors.
 *All of the classes select seven (7) non-affiliated directors, for a total
of twenty-seven (27) directors.

Quorum:  A majority of all members, including a majority in at least three
classes.  In the case of directors, there must be 14 directors.

Board Decisions:  A board decision requires a majority of the directors
present.

Standing Committees:  There are three standing committees:  the Planning
Coordination Committee, the Operating Committee, and the Market Interface
Committee.

Committee Voting:  For purposes of voting on recommendations to the board,
committees are divided into three classes:  (1) transmission providers, (2)
transmission customers, and (3) States and Provincial Members (which is Class
5). In order to make a recommendation to the board, there must be a simple
majority of votes from the transmission provider and transmission customer
classes.

Termination:  The WIO can be terminated upon a vote of the majority of the
members.


Greg,

I faxed you the promotional on 10300 Heritage Office Building with the Nimitz post office.  The broker called back shortly after I spoke to you to let me know that the kestrel air park building and the strip center at fm78 & walzem had both sold.  Let me know what you think of this property.  Also, let me know of any other ideas about replacement property.

Phillip


We do not need an ACA charge on any of the direct meters.
Please take these off deal #216184.  There are probably more,
but I will send them as they come up.  Thanks, Gloria


Start Date: 3/5/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030514.txt


June 23, 1999

Home,
A sort of honor, not a building site,
Wherever we are, when, if we chose, we might,
Be somewhere else, but trust that we have chosen right.

W.H. Auden

The view from my living room, a southern view, begins with a mess of red
tiled rooftops tumbling down to the Halic (Golden Horn).  On the other side
of the Halic (a river-harbor, once beautiful and fast flowing, now stalled
and polluted) are the hills where the ancient city Byzantium (later to be
called Constantinople, later still Istanbul) was founded nearly six
centuries before the birth of Christ.  Above a cement colored smear of
apartment buildings of much more recent vintage, I can make out the outlines
of towers that were part of defensive walls first started in the 500's AD.
I can also see the massive Selimiye and Mihrimah Mosques, built in the
1500's during the reign of perhaps the greatest Ottoman, Suleyman the
Magnificent.  Otherwise, the hillsides of Eski (Old) Istanbul are covered by
the before mentioned apartment buildings, relatively new but already
appearing weary from overuse and ready for replacement.  They are, I
suppose, full of people who for the most part work far too much for far too
little and who must wonder, more and more, with each passing day, about the
relevance of their muezzins' cries.  Incongruously, hundreds, maybe
thousands, of sea gulls, screeching a bit like Halloween pranksters, dip and
rise in the air space between me and all of that.

I recently bought a cheap guitar (I left a better one back in the States)
from my friend Ilyas, and from time to time I sit looking out my window
while playing sad songs from America's south (the easiest kind to play --
slow, with three chords and, as Bono [pretentiously] said, the truth).  This
evening, I did just that, singing and playing, among others, a song by Steve
Earle, in which he laments having forgotten to say goodbye to some long ago
love ("Was I off somewhere, or maybe just too high?") and one by Lucinda
Williams, who sings about hitting the road in order to forget ("When I get
to Baton Rouge, I won't cry a tear for you").  A pile of clouds staacked up
on the horizon prevents me from seeing the sunset, but the invisible sun
still makes its presence know, bordering them crimson.  I watch the
neddle-like vapor trail of a jet crawl west -- until it too disappears
behind the clouds -- all the time wondering about when I too will be heading
in that same direction.

What will it be like to be in America again?  I don't think I've ever
developed particularly deep psychic connections with places, though that is
not to say I haven't loved the places I've lived.  I truly adore San
Francisco and I always come to Dallas's defense.  I appreciate Aurora
(Illinois) and miss Westfield (New Jersey), often wondering what it would
have been like to have finished my growing up there.  But because, perhaps,
I ultimately value experience more than comfort -- and, don't get me wrong,
I value comfort a great deal -- maybe I haven't been able to convince
myself, at some critical, fundamental level, to believe that settling down
in one place (or, come to think of it, with one person) for the rest of my
life is an  ultimate goal.  Of course, I worry about where this all might
lead, with the specter of absolute -- and perhaps, God forbid, unbearable --
loneliness sometimes seeming a real possibility.  But, then again, maybe I'm
just looking for the ultimate home, and will burrow in deeply once I've
found it.

My great buddy Misha and his wife Nina just returned to their home after
what was, for me at least, a wonderful ten-day visit.  They weren't so sure
about the Boza (a sweet, slightly fermented drink made from millet) I
accosted them with at a tiny caf? in the center of Eski Istanbul, but they
tried it anyway.  Later, forgetting about how scared I had been the first
time I was there, I think I spooked them a bit when I lead them on a
post-dusk walk through the "working class" Kucuk Pazar neighborhood (on our
way to the breathtaking interior and exterior views at the Suleymaniye
Mosque).  While passing through Kucuk Pazar, we turned into one particularly
poorly lit street and came upon a crowd of men talking and smoking in near
total darkness.  (I could only tell they were smoking by the occasional
flare of the embers at the end of their cigarettes.)  After first not
knowing what in the world we'd stumbled onto, I realized we were passing
near a hamam (Turkish public bath) -- no doubt an immensely important
institution in Kucuk Pazar, as many of the apartments there (I have been
told) have no showers.

Notwithstanding these, and a few other nonstarters, I still think Misha and
Nina's trip was a success.  We did and saw a lot, albiet while suffering
through the hot, humid beginnings of an Istanbul summer.  Probably of most
significance, to me, was checking in with Misha after nearly nine months
apart.  We had much to talk about, or at least to allude to vaguely.  During
one of our more memorable (i.e. ridiculous) jaunts into these wordy
never-never lands (which occurred on the roof porch of my building and
lasted until four in the morning), Misha was patient and courteous when I
suggested that maybe our lives are played out in the barely understood space
between an incomprehensible universe and an equally incomprehensible self.
Misha wanted to give ourselves more credit in the ability to understand
department.  In response, I referred to some of the books I've read.

This summer I will not be taking formal Turkish lessons, though I plan on
studying Turkish a lot; for example, translating newspaper articles and
writing and, with the help of Ismail and Sukran, trying to absorb more
deeply all that I have learned to date.  And I have learned a lot, including
an incredible amount of grammar and vocabulary.  Still, I wonder if this old
dog brain of mine is thinking less about the next meal than about where to
lay down afterwards.  My biggest problem -- among many, I know -- is
"hearing" Turkish.  (My two most used sentences are "Ne dediniz [What did
you say]?" and "Tekrar soyleyebilir misiniz [Can you say that again]?".)  I
will be buying a television (ugh!), as I've concluded that a television is
an important way to learn how to "hear" Turkish.

Most importantly, this summer I will finally be beginning a regular writing
program, writing for a least three hours a day, five days a week.
("Insallah [With god's help].")  That, coupled with work and Turkish (and my
reading), should keep me pretty busy and, hopefully, productive.  At least I
should be sending a few more e-mails.

More later.

Mark-O

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


FYI.  Attached is a presentation on gas markets that I gave to an electricity
group yesterday.  The group was formed out of California's restructuring
legislation (AB 1980).  It's called the "AB 1980 Implementation Group" (I
heard that the group decided that its time to change its name.).  The group
includes just about all of the interest groups in California.

I focused on the fact that gas offers a model of a "real" market that
California should look to in order to fix the "artificial" and failed
electricity model created by AB 1980.

Best,
Jeff

---- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/15/2000 10:14 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	11/13/2000 01:49 PM

		 To: April Hrach/SF/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:


I will handle the non-TVA SERC deals until John Suarez joins the group.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Braddock, Billy
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:56 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	NCMPA 1

Kevin,

Who now handles Duke's system territory with King switching to ERCOT?  You or Fletch?

North Carolina Mun. Power Agency 1 has informally requested up to 100MW of capacity and energy for May-Sep'02 with a "relatively high" strike price (probably $100) into Duke, or regulatory capacity.

Formally, they have issued 2 RFP's:  1) to buy as much as 750MW of intermediate, peaking, and reserve capacity for summer peak months of 2003 and beyond (1-5 years), increasing by approx. 25MW per year; 2) to sell up to eight, 50MW blocks of 7x24 energy, system firm or unit contingent, off of Catawba and/or McGuire nuclear plants, interconnected with the Duke trans. system, beginning 1/1/03 (1-8 year term).

BB


we are going in saturday.  thanksgiving was great.  i played golf all weekend.  how was yours.  i really appreciate you sending that resume on.  did you get this reply earlier?  my cpu keeps blowing up.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:38 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

i think so, but i haven't made definite plans yet.  are you?
i called my brother in law and he said he'd talk to someone to see what's out there.
i'll let you know if i hear anything.
did you have a good thanksgiving?
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >> ]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:28 PM
To: Jilallen
Subject: RE:
are you going in town for the lsu game this weekend?
    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:59 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:
   send it to me when you get a chance and i'll give it to him.
   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  <<
   File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  >> ]
   Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:46 PM
   To: Jilallen
   Subject: RE:
   yeah.  i can email it to you.  i will give you a call later tonight.
       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:06 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:
      i'll talk to him and let you know.  do you have a resume put
   together?
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  <<
   File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  >>  <<
      File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  >>  >> ]
      Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:47 PM
      To: Jilallen
      Subject: RE:
      definately.  tell him i trade west basis in the natural gas market.
   i
      appreciate it.
          -----Original Message-----
         From:   "Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:36 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:
         Do you want me to talk to him for you?  If so, do I need to tell
   him
         that you have experience with anything specific?
         -----Original Message-----
         From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  >>  >>  << File:
         mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  >>  << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File: mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >>  >>  >>  >> ]
         Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:29 PM
         To: Jilallen
         Subject:
         i think that i need to give my resume to your brother in law.
   enron
      is
         collapsing.
   **********************************************************************
         This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
      affiliate
         and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
   use
      of
         the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
      disclosure
         by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
      recipient
         (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
      sender
         or reply to Enron Corp. at
   enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
      and
         delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
         hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do
   not
         create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between
   Enron
         Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any
      other
         party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a
   contract
      by
         estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
   **********************************************************************
         - This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
         information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
         protected by law.  - If you are not the intended recipient, you
      should
         delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
         copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any
   action
         based on it, is strictly prohibited.
      This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
      information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
      protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should
      delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of
   this
      message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly
      prohibited.
   - This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
   information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
   protected by law.  - If you are not the intended recipient, you should
   delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
   copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action
   based on it, is strictly prohibited.
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


Hello there fellow Fraters:
I 'm just wishing you all the best on this weekends Civil
War.  I hope to see and speak with as many of you as
possible this weekend whether at the game or at good old
Clodfelters.  As for the Alumni donation, I guess we are
almost there.  If you haven't given but have been
considering it, let Dustin or I (Rich T771) know.  If you
haven't considered it yet, then maybe you could start?
Thank you for your time and Go Beavs.

Rich Roskopf      ffitness@uswest.net


In our morning meeting yesterday you asked what the financial picture looked like on this CP.

This is in-the-money (ITM) to ENA approximately $69,000.  There is one gas swap (TAGG# VH6425), which expires Jun02.

Hope this helps.

Louis R. DiCarlo
ENA Gas Structuring
Phone: 713-345-4666
Email: louis.dicarlo@enron.com


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
11/20/00 MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
11/20/00 MANAGEMENT-GAS 2,010,184
11/20/00 MANAGEMENT-PWR 196,977.
11/20/00 AGG-MANAGEMENT 2,036,711


This is a location where you can find ha and rt prices right next to each
other for any day.... Rao is working on getting us the da numbers too right
next to these...
http://eastpower.dev.corp.enron.com/plasma_outages/NYISO.asp

If you have any suggestions on this please let me know
-narsimha