Please print.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/14/2000 04:57
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 12/14/2000 04:26:00 PM
To: "'Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com'" <Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com>
cc: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "'Jim.Gilbert@enron.com'"
<Jim.Gilbert@enron.com>, "'Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com'"
<Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com>, "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Turbine / Transformer Prototype Documents

 <<2RZ501!.DOC>>  <<2R6LRED.DOC>>  <<2RZ601!.DOC>>  <<2RLSRED.DOC>>
<<2RZ5RED.DOC>>  <<2RZ801!.DOC>>  <<2RSWRED.DOC>>

We have enclosed initial drafts of the following documents:

 1. Letter Agreement for the Turbine Transaction (clean copy and
blacklined copy marked to reflect revisions from the current draft of the
turbine letter agreement with Coral);

 2. Letter Agreement for the Transformer Transaction (clean
copy, blacklined copy marked to reflect revisions from the current draft of
the transformer letter agreement with Coral, and blacklined copy marked to
reflect revisions from the turbine letter agreement referenced as item no. 1
above);

 3. Limited Liability Company Agreement (clean copy and
blacklined copy marked to reflect revisions from the current draft of the
LLC agreement for CA/ED-II).

As mentioned on the telephone, I have retained a number of the
representations and warranties requested by Coral, with modifications where
necessary to eliminate those aspects which were objectionable to Enron.  The
justification for this is that nearly any purchaser would insist on such
representations, and it is often more advantageous to present a draft that
appears to be neutral, rather than allow the counterparty to focus on what
is not there and then have the advantage of drafting precisely what it
wants.  Therefore, we suggest that Enron carefully review the
representations and warranties in order that any objectionable items can be
eliminated before circulation of documents to the counterparty.  Because we
rearranged and reorganized the representations and warranties to make a more
clear presentation, the blacklined drafts will not be very helpful fur
purposes of reviewing representations and warranties.

Please review the enclosed at your convenience and advise of any comments.
Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-73-7 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 129569v1
  129569v1 from 128541v14
  129570v1
  129570v1 from 129088v6
  129570v1 from 129569v1
  129572v1
  129572v1 from 129344v1

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2RZ501!.DOC
 - 2R6LRED.DOC
 - 2RZ601!.DOC
 - 2RLSRED.DOC
 - 2RZ5RED.DOC
 - 2RZ801!.DOC
 - 2RSWRED.DOC


Thanks Harry!

	Harry M Collins
	02/13/2001 12:36 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marie
Heard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: RUSH APPROVAL:  Torch Energy Marketing Inc.

I do not know of any problems with Torch Energy.

	Tana Jones
	02/13/2001 12:26 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari
Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RUSH APPROVAL:  Torch Energy Marketing Inc.

Need to hear ASAP whether you have any problems with this counterparty.


call me if you're in town this weeekend


Please advise when you have final numbers for the credit section and I will
proceed.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Mary:  Mieco is one of Carol's "Top Tens".  Would you please take this one?
Ed Sacks will be calling you shortly.  Thanks.  Sara


So are you going tonight or not?


sorry i didn't get back to you sooner this week about dinner, but things have been crazy.  my brother and wife left yesterday to drive to kentucky and their new base so most of my free time was spent with family....

susan

 -----Original Message-----

From: 	Stephan, Nicholas J
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:34 AM
To:	Scott, Susan M.
Subject:

Susan,

Do you feel like getting together for dinner this week to catch up?  Let me know when works for you; I'm fairly flexible this week.

Nick


THE LIGHTHOUSE
"Enlightening Ideas for Public Policy..."
VOL. 3, ISSUE 20
May 21, 2001

Welcome to The Lighthouse, the e-mail newsletter of The Independent
Institute, the non-politicized, public policy research organization
<http://www.independent.org>. We provide you with updates of the
Institute's current research publications, events and media programs.

Do you know someone who would enjoy THE LIGHTHOUSE? Please forward
this message to a friend. If they like it, they can add themselves to
the list at http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/Lighthouse.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

IN THIS WEEK'S ISSUE:
1. The Pearl Harbor Deception
2. Challenging the FTC's Hostility to Mergers
3. "Will Encryption Protect Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" --
David Friedman Transcript Now Online

-------------------------------------------------------------

THE PEARL HARBOR DECEPTION

The creators of "Pearl Harbor" -- the new movie debuting Friday that
Hollywood insiders are calling "'Titanic' with fighter planes" --
have missed a vital aspect of Pearl Harbor history.

Although the movie's emphasis is on entertainment, not historical
enlightenment, during the film's production Jerry Bruckheimer, the
producer, made sure to consult Pearl Harbor survivors, historians,
and government officials. But one perspective he never took seriously
is one based on secret U.S. documents recently declassified under the
Freedom of Information Act.

"Overwhelming evidence contained in the May 2000 Freedom of
Information Act release," writes Robert B. Stinnett in the new
paperback edition of his book DAY OF DECEIT: The Truth About FDR and
Pearl Harbor, "reveals that by mid-November 1941, as Japanese naval
forces headed for Hawaii, America's radio cryptographers had solved
the principal Japanese naval codes and that Japan's top admirals went
on the Japanese naval airwaves and in a series of radio messages
disclosed that Pearl Harbor was the target of their raid."

"Based on these transmissions, President Roosevelt and General George
Marshall predicted war with Japan would begin the first week of
December. We would know even more about what FDR and his chief
advisors thought, but the Japanese radio messages remain incomplete,
still cloaked in American censorship.... By continuing to classify
Japanese naval intercepts and their communication decoding data as
'national defense secrets,' the National Security Agency (NSA) has
done a disservice to the excellent cryptographers and the radio
intelligence obtained by monitor stations operated by the United
States and her allies in 1941, as well as to history itself."

"Nevertheless," concludes Stinnett, "the major secrets of Pearl
Harbor are at last out in the open. After years of denial, the truth
is clear: we knew."

Unfortunately, this truth will not be coming soon to a theater near you.

See Robert B. Stinnett's op-ed, "December 7, 1941: A Setup from the Beginning"
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-1.html.

For a transcript of Mr. Stinnett's talk at the Independent Policy
Forum, "Pearl Harbor: Official Lies in an American War Tragedy?" see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-2.html.

To hear it in RealAudio, go to
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-3.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

CHALLENGING THE FTC's HOSTILITY TO MERGERS

Although the Microsoft antitrust trial loomed largest in the public
consciousness, it was not the only important antitrust trial in
recent years. Another antitrust case -- the Federal Trade
Commission's successful challenge to the merger of two office-supply
"superstores" -- will have far-reaching effects, even if the
Microsoft case is ultimately thrown out on appeal.

The FTC prevented a proposed merger of Staples and Office Depot by
arguing that a merger would raise the price of office supplies,
citing evidence that office-supply prices were significantly higher
in cities with only one company operating office-supply superstores.

The defense accepted this evidence as true, but argued that higher
prices were explained by higher costs in one-firm markets. What they
didn't do, according to the judge, was to offer a unifying theory to
explain why one-firm markets might have higher costs. Economist Craig
M. Newmark offers such a theory, based on what economists call
"indivisibility rents," in a new Independent Institute working paper.

In essence, Newmark argues that the whole point of superstores is to
have a store large enough to minimize the costs of transportation,
advertising, and the like. In markets that can only support one
store, the market is often too small to minimize these costs. Hence,
the higher prices in these markets.

This theory, presented above in the sketchiest fashion, is consistent
with other evidence presented by the FTC. Markets having only two
office supply superstore chains were notably smaller than those with
three firms, suggesting that indivisibility was a factor.
Unfortunately, the FTC apparently didn't consider indivisibility in
its analysis.

"The indivisibility theory implies that the higher prices in one-firm
markets are not due to lack of competition; the merger should not
raise prices."

Consumers and their representatives, then, should let the FTC know
that a knee-jerk hostility to mergers isn't in the public interest.
Checking for indivisibility should be a staple of FTC analysis.

See "The Positive Correlation of Price and Concentration in Staples:
Market Power or Indivisibility?" by Craig M. Newmark, Independent
Institute Working Paper #31, at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-4.html.

For more on antitrust see the Independent Institute Archive at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-5.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

"WILL ENCRYPTION PROTECT PRIVACY AND MAKE GOVERNMENT OBSOLETE?" --
David Friedman Transcript Now Online

Someone once said that the move toward civilization coincided with
the move toward privacy.

New advances in information technology allow the possibility of
greater privacy, but they also make it easier for government
bureaucrats, criminals, and other unwanted intruders to snoop into
your private life. Will privacy-enhancing technology outpace
privacy-threatening technology? Will freedom and civilization thereby
advance? Or will the new technology strengthen the rule of Big
Brother?

Economist and legal scholar David D. Friedman addressed these and
related issues in his recent Independent Policy Forum talk, "Will
Encryption Protect Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" -- a
transcription of which is now available on the Independent Institute
website.

Leery of predicting the future, Prof. Friedman said that he would not
forecast beyond 30 years -- after that, all bets are off. For the
coming three decades, however, he predicts that "public key
encryption," a young technology increasingly used in e-commerce, is
likely to promote privacy -- unless the government acts immediately
to control its use.

Rather than control what people do with personal information about
you, public key encryption lets you decide with whom you want to
share that information. With it, we can better ensure that financial
information, health records, and other information will only go to
those we deem are on a need-to-know basis.

Further, public key encryption -- along with e-mail re-mailers -- can
promote anonymity, making it increasingly possible for you to buy and
sell over the Internet without the taxman knowing about it. And
"anonymous" companies in cyberspace can easily build a solid
reputation needed to gain a loyal customer base. Thus we may soon
have an underground cyber-economy that rivals the size of underground
economy in the real world.

Public key encryption also acts as a virtual Second Amendment,
according to Friedman. Just as the Second Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution institutionalized the self-defense of the citizenry
against a federal tyranny, so public key encryption will
institutionalize the self-defense of the citizenry against government
propaganda. Americans (and citizens of other countries) will be
better armed with the truth. Information about government
encroachment will be easier to spread and thereby help keep it in
check.

For a transcript of David Friedman's talk, "Will Encryption Protect
Privacy and Make Government Obsolete?" see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-6.html.

For more on privacy, see:

"Freedom of Speech, Information Privacy, and the Troubling
Implications of a Right to Stop People from Speaking About You" by
Eugene Volokh, Independent Institute Working Paper #14
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-7.html

"Watching You: Systematic Federal Surveillance of Ordinary Americans"
by Charlotte Twight (THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW, Fall 1999)
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-8.html

"Information Technology as a Universal Solvent for Removing State
Stains" by David R. Henderson (THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW, Spring 2000)
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-9.html

R.W. Bradford's review of PRIVACY IN THE INFORMATION AGE by Fred H.
Cate (THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW, Spring 1999)
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-10.html

"Cryptography versus Big Brother" and "Internet Encryption and the
Second Amendment," by Alex Tabarrok, research director of The
Independent Institute
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-11.html
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-12.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

THE LIGHTHOUSE is made possible by the generous contributions of
supporters of The Independent Institute. If you enjoy THE LIGHTHOUSE,
please consider making a donation to The Independent Institute. For
details on the Independent Associate Membership program, see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-13.html
, or contact Ms. Priscilla Busch by phone at 510-632-1366 x105, fax
to 510-568-6040, email to <PBusch@independent.org>, or snail mail to
The Independent Institute, 100 Swan Way, Oakland, CA 94621-1428.
All contributions are tax-deductible.  Thank you!

-------------------------------------------------------------

For previous issues of THE LIGHTHOUSE, see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-14.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

For information on books and other publications from The Independent
Institute, see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-15.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

For information on The Independent Institute's upcoming Independent
Policy Forums, see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-20-16.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

To subscribe (or unsubscribe) to The Lighthouse, please go to
http://www.independent.org/subscribe.html, choose "subscribe" (or
"unsubscribe"), enter your e-mail address and select "Go."

-------------------------------------------------------------

If you like our service, you may also like PolicyBot, an excellent
resource from the Heartland Institute -- the people who bring you
Intellectual Ammunition, Environment and Climate News, Health Care
News, and School Reform News. PolicyBot is a Web archive of over 7000
public policy documents, which come from over 300 organizations and
publications, cover topics from agriculture to welfare, including
budgets, taxes, regulation, health care, and environment, and take a
generally low-tax, limited-government personal-responsibility
perspective.

The "Hot Docs" e-mail service from Heartland alerts you to the latest
op-eds, studies, and papers that are available through PolicyBot.
Sending a message to laplante@heartland.org will add you to the Hot
Docs list. Please note whether you want to receive the daily or
weekly version.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright ? 2001 The Independent Institute
100 Swan Way
Oakland, CA 94621-1428
(510) 632-1366 phone
(510) 568-6040 fax


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

The CIS Conferencec provides utility management personnel unequaled insight
and current information on Customer Relationship Management (CRM),
E-Commerce, Technologies and Marketing. Fifty-four sessions conducted by
utility industry representatives will focus on issues facing the industry.
Over 100 companies will exhibit the latest technologies and services.

Former President George Bush is our Honored Keynote Speaker

www.cisconference.org
e-ProCom Europe for Utilities and Energy e-Business Conference & Exhibition -
May 22-23, 2001, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

e-Commerce/e-Business/Integrating the Digital Utility/ Pan-European
attendance from the major utilities and energy players can be found at the
e-ProCom Europe: for Utilities & Energy e-Business. Call 31-346-590901 or
email jhh@synergy-events.com  or visit our web site at:
www.e-procomseries.com.
[IMAGE]
In an exclusive SCIENTECH PowerHitters interview, Jeff Sterba, CEO of Public
Utility of New Mexico (PNM), shares some keys that have helped the small
company find success in the wholesale power market. He also looks at issues
affecting deregulation both in New Mexico and across the country.  Read the
questions Sterba was asked at: www.scientech.com

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
April 20, 2001

Deal for SCE's Transmission Assets Appears Dead on Arrival

by Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[News item from Reuters] California Gov. Gray Davis' billion dollar plan to
save utility Southern California Edison (SCE) from bankruptcy is in deep
trouble and could be rejected by legislators. Legislative sources said the
governor was having so much trouble gathering support for his plan that he
could not find anyone to sponsor a bill. One Assembly official called the SCE
bailout plan "the most unpopular piece of legislation in years."

Analysis: Even when this deal was announced as an "agreement in principle"
some 50 days ago, it seemed too far-fetched to be possible. The only party
that clearly seems to benefit from the agreement forged between Gov. Davis
and SCE is the cash-strapped utility. California energy customers appear to
get the short end of an expensive stick, while the state seemingly gains
nothing of value beyond what could amount to a whole new set of
administrative problems. Thus, despite the hype with which Gov. Davis
announced this rescue plan for SCE, California legislators-both Republicans
and Democrats-are saying  "not so fast" and appear to be collectively opposed
to the plan as it currently stands. As it becomes apparent that the
California Legislature will not approve this plan, the general consensus is
that Gov. Davis' offer to SCE is simply a financial bailout for the utility
that provides no benefit to California residents.

For background on the details of Gov. Davis' rescue plan for SCE, please
reference my IssueAlert from 4/11/01. In a nutshell, the state of California
agreed to buy SCE's 12,000-mile transmission grid, which covers much of the
southern half of the state, for $2.76 billion, 2.3 times the system's book
value. SCE would be allowed to use the proceeds to pay off its existing debt,
restoring it to financial stability.  Both the California Legislature and the
CPUC need to approve this deal by Aug. 15 or else the agreement is
terminated.

In the highly politicized climate under which the California energy crisis
has unfolded, it is imperative to understand the agendas that each
stakeholder possesses. For instance, keep in mind that Gov. Davis' political
career has been severely damaged by the state's energy crisis, and the fact
that Pacific Gas & Electric Co., California's largest utility company,
declared bankruptcy has only further tainted the governor's standing. Perhaps
more than any other goal, Davis wants to keep SCE from also filing for
Chapter 11 protection. In addition, Davis believes he will be better able to
solve the crisis if he assumes control over the state's transmission grid
(much like the state has assumed the role of a power purchasing agent).
Normally, a measure supported by the Democratic governor could be easily
approved by California's Democrat-controlled legislature. However, the energy
issue has divided support for Davis even within his own party. Consequently,
the governor needs the support of both Republicans and Democrats in order to
see his rescue plan for SCE pass.

For its part, there was very little reason why SCE should not have agreed to
the governor's terms. From multiple standpoints, the utility gains enormously
from the governor's offer, while at the same time it avoids lengthy and
costly bankruptcy proceedings. Under the agreement, SCE gains a method for
pulling itself out of debt, via rate increases that probably would be
implemented over the next 15 years. Further, its parent company Edison
International gets to hold on to a reported $4.8 billion that SCE has
provided to the corporate operation since 1997. (The exception to this is a
$400 million tax refund that Edison International would give back to SCE).
While Davis referred to his plan as a  "good, balanced deal," some consumer
groups have charged that SCE "has taken the governor to the cleaners."

Meanwhile, California customers clearly lose in the deal because they would
be forced to ultimately pay for the $2.76 billion that the state needs to buy
the transmission assets. The state would purchase the lines with bonds that
would be paid off by transmission fees charged to SCE customers. It is
presently not clear whether or not those fees, which are already part of
monthly bills, would be sufficient; therefore, it is likely that rates would
be increased to support the purchase. In addition, the subtext of the deal is
that customers would ultimately pay to drive down SCE's debt, which was
accumulated as a result of unrestricted wholesale power costs charged by
generators. Consequently, California customers would bear the responsibility
for prices that FERC has at times deemed "unjust and unreasonable."

Ultimately, however, it is the California Legislature and CPUC that will have
the authority to approve the agreement between Gov. Davis and SCE. These two
agencies must ultimately decide if the plan is good or bad, and weigh the
impact for various stakeholders. Presently, the legislature in particular is
finding that there are many questionable aspects about the plan. For
instance, what value would there be in the California government owning only
one portion of the state's interconnected transmission system? PGOCorp. has
walked away from the negotiating table and has expressed little interest in
selling its transmission lines to the state. No agreement with Sempra Energy
(parent of San Diego Gas & Electric) has been reached either. Thus, if the
Gov. Davis / SCE agreement is approved, the state of California would gain
ownership rights to only a portion of the overall transmission system in the
state. Many legislators challenge the value of this, especially when it is
considered that most of the congestion that leads to higher prices within the
state is concentrated along PG&E's portion of the grid. The counter-argument
to this point is that, now that its utility is in bankruptcy proceedings,
PGOmay not have the choice of whether or not to sell its transmission assets
to the state. The bankruptcy judge would make this decision. Thus, some
argue, the state may have a better chance of obtaining PG&E's transmission
assets if it can first complete a deal with SCE.

The second fundamental problem is that causing California legislators to turn
their back on the governor's plan is what some have referred to as an
"obscene bailout" for SCE and its parent company. Some reportedly believe
that Gov. Davis rushed into an overly generous offer for SCE out of anxiety
caused by the breakdown in his communications with PG&E. As noted, the $2.76
billion offer for SCE's assets is about 2.3 times their book value, so many
legislators are having difficulty reconciling what appears to be an
inappropriate price tag (and, once again, a cost that taxpayers and
ratepayers would ultimately have to absorb). Currently, SCE customers pay a
FERC-approved transmission rate based upon a cost-plus formula. If the state
pays 2.3 times book value, it would equate to ratepayers paying two times
over for those same transmission lines. In addition, some legislators,
including former Democratic allies of Gov. Davis, have suggested that SCE
should be forced to enter bankruptcy as Pacific Gas & Electric Co. has done.
Naturally, legislators will approach the issue with their constituents in
mind, knowing that they will be accountable for how they vote on this plan.
Looking at the issue from a customer perspective, one could argue that SCE
declaring bankruptcy would create less financial hardship for California
customers than bailing out the utility and increasing rates. This will be a
major political challenge for California legislators to resolve if the
governor's plan becomes sponsored as a bill.

If I pull out my crystal ball and be so bold as to make projections in this
case, I would predict that there is little chance that Gov. Davis' rescue
plan for SCE will pass in its current form. The energy crisis in California
has become so politicized that legislators will be very reticent to approve
any measure that resembles a financial bailout for one of the utilities,
especially without obtaining something of value for the state in return. It
is Gov. Davis' personal agenda to obtain control over the state's
transmission assets, but I don't see this as being a priority for other
California lawmakers. Thus, the deal will be a tough sell unless some new
development occurs that puts owning SCE's transmission assets in the state's
best interest. Considering the many headaches associated with this business,
and the fact that the state has no expertise in this area, I don't see this
occurring. Consequently, the game is by no means over for SCE and its
potential for bankruptcy does not appear to have decreased to any large
extent. One large California utility is already in bankruptcy court. We could
be only days or weeks away from seeing SCE head in that direction as well.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.scientech.com

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily email, send a message to
IssueAlert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 07/16/2001 01:23 PM -----

	Ginger Dernehl 06/18/2001 02:11 PM 	   To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron  cc: Jody Underwood/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lysa Tracy/ENRON@enronXgate, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Terri Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron  Subject: Campaign Leadership Conf. Call (Change)

Please mark your schedules to note the change in the dial-in information for the call mentioned above.  This change will take place immediately.

Date:		Thursday (weekly call)

Time:		4:30 pm (CDT)

Number:	1-800-998-2462 (domestic)
		703-736-7230 (international)
		passcode 5316376

Thanks and please don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions.

gngr
713-853-7751


Mr. Lay will not be able to attend.

Rosalee

Shawn Christy <src@delphigroup.com>@delphigroup.com> on 06/21/2000 11:28:26 AM
Please respond to Shawn Christy <src@delphigroup.com>
To: Kenneth Lay <kenneth.lay@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Delphi Aspen Executive Summit

Dear Kenneth,

 Hello! I wanted to inform you of an exclusive Delphi Event.  Attached is a
letter from Tom Koulopoulos, The Delphi Group's CEO, explaining the details
for our upcoming Executive Retreat to be held on August 28-29 in Aspen. This
is going to be a truly unique experience.

 I would like to extend you and other senior level executives at Enron an
invitation to this  event. I have already invited George Short. This event is
limited attendance since the St. Regis Aspen can only accommodate 200. The
early registration fee is $2500.00 per seat.

 I will follow up with you later in the week. In the meantime, if you have
any questions, please e-mail or call me at 617-247-1511.

Best Regards,

Shawn Christy
src@delphigroup.com

About Delphi Group
 Delphi Group, www.delphigroup.com, is a global integrated services provider
and the leading voice on B2B E-business, corporate portals and knowledge &
content management . Through its advisory services, consulting, market
research, and community-building conferences worldwide, Delphi Group provides
objective thought leadership that has assisted more than 15,000 professionals
at nearly every major national and global organization and branch of
government.

 - AspenLetter.pdf


Nick,

We may have problems getting the VC location in Houston on  short notice.
We are currently on stand-by. We shall default, if we have no other choice,
to a phone interview.

Vince

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Nick Mooney                           04/18/2000 09:09 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Video Conference with Ross McIntyre

Vince,

you should have received an invitation through lotus notes which outlines the
VC location for the conference call tomorrow.  It is schedule for 4:30pm UK
time (10:30am Houston time)

Ross's background is from Investment banking ex Dresner bank, he has a PhD in
Mathematical and is currently with speedwell weather derivatives where he has
been developing weather derivative pricing and portfolio optimisation tools
which they have been marketing to end-users with weather risks.
The attached word documents are articles that he has written for publication.

regards
Nick Mooney

 - MCS.doc
 - Analytic.doc
 - PAR.doc


It was good seeing you.  Thanks for dinner.  Shawna and I were waiting for
your call about a coffee (she even said she'd buy!), but I guess we missed
you for this trip.  She sends her regards!

I harassed Justy about his movie career.  He told me he was the body double
for Russell Crowe.  I asked him whether he and/or his horse had hired agents
yet (depending on who was getting better reviews!)

Keep me posted on the house.  It looked great!


I have one large sweater left from the ski trip last February,  first come
first served.


For your information
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Courtney, John P. <johncourtney@akllp.com>
To: Runnels, David <davidrunnels@akllp.com>; Spiers, Jeffrey
<jeffreyspiers@akllp.com>
Sent: Thu Dec 06 11:35:30 2001
Subject: Enron Former Employee Sites

I noticed that some of the former employees have put up web sites
(www.enronx.org).  While none of them seem too nasty at this point, I
wanted you to know that we have experience in dealing with disgruntled
employees who put up disparaging and infringing sites. JPC


********************[ A D V E R T I S E M E N T ]****************
Is your online broker built to trade? Datek Online's advanced
technology gives you fast executions, real time quotes and
immediate portfolio updates. For a limited-time offer, go to
http://www.datek.com/sivy/  Datek Online. Member NASD/SIPC.
*****************************************************************
SIVY ON STOCKS from money.com
December 8, 2000

Electroshock in California

As the electricity shortage in the Golden State reaches a crisis, local
utilities are getting badly squeezed. But independent power producers are
having a field day.

By Michael Sivy

The craziness in Florida has overshadowed an even more bizarre story
unfolding in California. The Golden State is running out of electricity and
on Thursday declared an unprecedented "Stage Three" alert. To conserve
power, emergency measures are being considered that would ordinarily be
unthinkable. Pumps that move water from Northern to Southern California may
be idled for part of the day. Older generating plants may be allowed to run
at levels that cause excess air pollution. Extra water may be diverted
through hydroelectric dams endangering rare salmon. And it's possible that
residents won't be able to turn on their Christmas lights until after 7:30
p.m.

California has been forced to contemplate such appalling measures because
of a hopelessly bungled electricity deregulation scheme begun in 1998. At
the time, experts predicted that competition could eventually cut
electricity costs by as much as 30 percent. To help California utilities
bolster their financial strength for the new competitive market, consumer
prices were left partially fixed until 2002, while wholesale costs were
allowed to seek market levels.

Since surplus power could be bought fairly cheaply, California electric
companies initially profited. But unfavorable weather boosted the demand
for electricity, while higher oil and gas prices increased costs for
suppliers. Prices for out-of-state power have soared: For example, the
cheapest surplus Canadian power that used to go for as little as $10 per
megawatt-hour recently hit $1,000 during periods of peak demand.

It's all been a catastrophe for California electric companies, which have
to pay market prices for power but are limited as to how much they can
charge consumers. The big utilities most affected are Edison International,
parent of Southern California Edison, and PG&E, parent of Pacific Gas &
Electric. Both stocks are down more than 25 percent from their highs.

But not all energy companies are suffering. One big beneficiary of this
mess is Duke Energy [DUK]. In addition to traditional power operations in
the Carolinas, Duke has an unregulated wholesale-energy subsidiary that
does extensive business in California and recently signed electricity
contracts with both Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas & Electric.
The subsidiary is also expanding and modernizing its California plants.
Those additions will account for a sizable chunk of the new generating
capacity expected to come on line over the next two years.

Duke has long been one of my favorite utilities. I recommended the stock in
May and again in July at $62 a share (see "Power companies" [
http://www.money.com/money/depts/investing/sivy/archive/000510.html ] and
"True value" [
http://www.money.com/money/depts/investing/sivy/archive/000728.html ]).
Since then, the share price has risen 38 percent to $85.75. With projected
earnings growth of 9.5 percent annually over the next five years and a 2.5
percent dividend yield, the stock offers a potential total return of 12
percent a year. At 19 times next year's estimated earnings, the stock looks
pricey for a utility, but the company certainly has a fantastic position.
I'd hang on to any that I already owned and buy more on any dips.

=======================
CHAT TRANSCRIPTS
MONEY's Michael Sivy identifies sectors and stocks that possess
true value in a rocky market.
http://www.money.com/chat/2000/001204.html

Tech Investor David Futrelle discusses the current state of the
tech market and the outlook for various sectors.
http://www.money.com/chat/2000/001201.html
=======================

###

Post your comments on Michael's column at:
http://www.money.com/depts/investing/sivy/index.html

To subscribe or unsubscribe to Sivy on Stocks, go to:
http://www.money.com/email/

Earning Releases and Calls
For the latest corporate earnings releases and online conference
calls click on: http://money.ccbn.com

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Special Internet Offer!!!

Sign up for a RISK-FREE issue of MONEY MAGAZINE at
http://www.money.com/subscribe2

Or if you prefer call our toll-free number 1-800-544-4594

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

We may, from time to time, contact you with offers for Time Inc.
products and services which we think may be of interest to you.
If you would prefer us not to contact you in this manner, AND
YOU DID NOT INDICATE THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP
for the Sivy on Stocks online newsletter or any other Time Inc.
online newsletters, please let us know by sending us an e-mail
at <no_solicit@money.com>.

Additionally, from time to time we may provide your e-mail
address to carefully chosen companies whose offers we think may
be of interest to you.  If you would prefer us not use your
e-mail address in this manner, AND YOU DID NOT INDICATE
THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP for the Sivy on Stocks online
newsletter or any other Time Inc. online newsletter, please let
us know by e-mailing us at <no_transfer@money.com>.


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000
02:00 PM ---------------------------

"Jennifer Cutaia" <jcutaia@tupac.com> on 05/12/2000 12:47:27 PM
To: judy.hernandez@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Alex's resume

Try to send this to Steve at this e-mail address:
Salisha.Ramos@enron.com
Thanks!

------------------------------------------------------------
Tupac: the man, the legend...the free e-mail service.
Click here -------------------->  http://www.tupac.com

 - Alejandro R.doc


I have two questions:

(1)  If the ECC financial trading business is to be confirmed in Canada,
won't Greg Johnston need a "short course" on ISDA/omnibus, etc.?  I was
thinking of practical issues as well as Tana's more formalized training.

(2)  Have you spoken with Mary Solomson about Anthony?  I'm not sure if Tana
has organized her lunch with global contracts, but it sounded as though
Anthony was part of the problem and that Mary should be at the lunch.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000
08:54 AM ---------------------------

Ashley Baxter@ENRON on 10/12/2000 07:19:55 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com, John Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Radu Tutos/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Denise Rancour/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Cal Berkeley General Presentation Confirmation - 10/16/00

We have been able to secure rooms at the Claremont Hotel in Berkeley.  Please
note the confirmation numbers listed below.  Thanks!

Claremont Resort and Spa - Berkeley
41 Tunnel Road
Berkeley, CA 94705
510-843-3000

FROM OAKLAND AIRPORT: Go straight out of the airport on Airport Blvd. Turn
right on Hegenberger Road. From Hegenberger
follow signs for 880 North. Follow Hwy 880 North and follow signs for Hwy 24
to Walnut Creek. Take the Claremont Avenue exit, turning
left at the bottom of the exit onto Claremont. Turn right on Ashby Avenue
(5th stoplight) and the Hotel's entrance is two blocks ahead on the left.

FROM SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT: Follow signs for Hwy 101 North to San Francisco,
take Hwy 80 East to the Bay Bridge to Oakland.
Cross Bay Bridge on Hwy 80, follow to 580 East, and exit onto HWY 24 to
Berkeley/Walnut Creek.  Follow Hwy 880 North and follow signs for
Hwy 24 to Walnut Creek. Take the Claremont Avenue exit, turning left at the
bottom of the exit onto Claremont. Turn right on Ashby Avenue
(5th stoplight) and the Hotel's entrance is two blocks ahead on the left.

---------------------- Forwarded by Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron on 10/12/2000
07:15 PM ---------------------------

Lara Marie Berry
10/10/2000 04:58 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Radu
Tutos/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Denise
Rancour/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron@Enron, Simone Lewis/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Cal Berkeley General Presentation Confirmation - 10/16/00

Cal Berkeley
General Presentation
Monday, October 16th

This note is to confirm that you are scheduled to attend the Cal Berkeley
General Presentation on Monday October 16th.  This e-mail should contain any
information that you need to know pertaining to your trip.  Please print out
a hard copy and bring with you in case of emergency.  If you have any
questions, there is a list of contacts listed below.

Once again, thank you for offering to help with technology recruiting at Cal
Berkeley.  See you on campus!

Lara

The General Presentation will be held:

Monday, October 16th
The Faculty Club
Seaborg Room - 2nd Floor
7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
**Please plan on arriving at the General Presentation by 6:00 p.m.

The General Presentation is designed to educate the students on Enron and the
Global Technology Track.  Following the presentation we will invite the
students to ask questions about Enron and the Global Technology Track.
Please plan to arrive at the General Presentation by 6:00 p.m.  It is
business casual attire.

FLIGHT ARRANGEMENTS:

You are responsible for scheduling your own flight arrangements with your
preferred airline provider.  Please schedule your flight to arrive to the San
Francisco airport on Monday, October 16th.   Please remember that there can
be significant traffic over the Bay Bridge and to get into town at least an
hour prior to the event.  Please make all flight arrangements through the
Travel Agency in the Park so that we are able to take advantage of discount
fares.  If you do not have a representative that you currently use at the
Travel Agency in the Park - feel free to contact Liz Mendiola at 713-860-1140.

RENTAL CAR ARRANGEMENTS:

Once again, you are responsible for scheduling your own rental car
arrangements with your preferred provider.  Your Travel Agency in the Park
representative should be able to assist you with rental car reservations.

HOTEL ARRANGEMENTS:

Hotel reservations are currently being made by our representative at the
Travel Agency in the Park.

As soon as we have confirmation numbers, I will let you know.

San Francisco Airport to The Faculty Club

Take 101 Northbound
Exit to San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge
Exit to 1-80 East
Exit on University Ave.
East on University Avenue for 1.5 miles to Oxford St.
Right on Oxford St., left on Durant Ave., left on Piedmont
You will see parking on the right side

Once again, thank you so much for helping with the General Presentation.
Below are some last minute tips to keep in mind:

Please remember to dress business casual.
Please remember to bring some business cards for students.
I have attached a pdf version of the Global Technology Track  brochure.
Please forward all expense receipts to Grace Garcia.  She will handle any
expenses incurred for this recruiting trip including: flight costs, hotel,
car, food, valet, etc.  However, you must turn in some sort of receipt - so
be sure and save them!

Ashley Baxter   work:  713-853-3589
    cell:  281-793-0567

Lara Berry   work:  713-345-8320
    cell:  713-857-1034

Grace Garcia   work:  713-853-7252

Simone Lewis   work:  713-853-1645


Herman Manis will need the opportunity to review, also.

ckm


Here are my accomplishments for the first half of the year.  Let me know if
you have any questions.
thanks
Sheri


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Graves, Jerry
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 10:57 AM
To:	Graves, Jerry; Alexander, James C.; Blair, Lynn; Bonnstetter, Mike; Boothe, David; Boston, Jerry; Brown, Sharon; Bryant, Mike; Buchanan, John; Burns, Christopher; Clark, Scott; Cordes, Bill; Corless, Gary; Corman, Shelley; Geaccone, Tracy; Gilbert, Tom; Good, Chuck; Gottsponer, Morgan; Graham, Charlie; Harris, Steven; Hood, Colleen; Howard, Randy; January, Steven; Jolly, Rich; Jordan, Fred; Keller, John R.; Kowalke, Terry; Kudym, Judy; Kuehl, Toby; Lawrence, James; LeBeau, Randy; Lowry, Phil; Maestas, Gary; Mall, Greg; Martens, Donna; McGillivray, RR; Moore, Jan; Morse, Ronnie; Nelson, Mike; Neubauer, Dave; Odneal, Dave; Rice, Randy; Roensch, David; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Schroeder, Jim; Smith, Rick; Spraggins, Gary; Stephens, LD; Swett, Larry; Thomas, Steve; Watson, Kimberly; Williams, Jo; Williams, Walt; Abdmoulaie, Mansoor; Alters, Dennis; Dushinske, Adam; Faucheaux, Eric; Frazier, Perry; Gilbert, Maurice; Hughes, Matt; Matthews, Ron; Ramsaran, Gale; Smith, Buzz; Anderson, Ken; Aschwege, Doug; Beck, Judy; Descoteaux, Carolyn; Dobbins, Dan; Johnson, Robert L.; Kolarik, David; Reinecke, Bryan; Sans Souci, Becki; Westfall, Roger; Asante, Ben; Choquette, Gary; Kouri, Kim; McChane, Bob; Sturn, John; Wirasinghe, Errol
Subject:	RE: Outage Commericial Review Meeting

Whoops! The meeting is 10/11/01. Sorry for the miscue.

FYI,

The next Outage Coordination Commercial Review meeting is 10/11/01.  The purpose for the meeting is to discuss outages that have a flow impact with the Commercial groups. Please review the attached outage report. If you have any questions or concerns, please give me a call.

Jerry Graves
713-345-8923

When: October 13 ?Wrong
Time: 1:00 to 2:00
Where: Houston 49C2
             Omaha  VCR - 7th floor
             Field Personnel - Conference # 877-795-3687
                                         Code # 755555
                                                                                << File: 101001Ts.xls >>
Northern Border Pipeline
 Location	Date  	Scope 	Comments

CS05	10/11/01 to 10/11/01	 Wash, MP2, replace their inlet air filters, and emissions test. (10 hrs)	Potential impact is low.
CS08	10/16/01 to 10/16/01	 Wash, MP2, replace engine injectors, and emissions test. (14 hrs)	Potential impact is low.
CS10	10/18/01 to 10/18/01	Remove 1790-829, and install 1790-820. Emission testing.  (14 hrs)	Potential impact is low.
CS13	10/23/01 to 10/23/01	 Wash, MP2, and block valve mods. (10 hrs)	Potential impact is low.
CS01	10/29/01 to 10/29/01	 Wash, MP2, (10 hrs)	Potential impact is low.
CS03	12/11/01 to 12/11/01	Wash, MP2 (10 hrs)	Impact is low.


Contact is Sue Stevens @714-765-4132. Sorry for the delay.

Thanks,
Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
01/10/2001 02:14 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Deal #493273 Anaheim

Hi Kate,
I need to verbally confirm this deal and I can't find a good phone number.
Can you get the contact name and number for me please?
Thanks!
Kim


Hello everyone:

We have moved the Wednesday V@R luncheon from 19C2 to 19C1
beginning today.

Thanks!

Shirley


Reservation status has changed to CONFIRMED. See attachment.

ASSIGNMENT_REF = 30773
SELLER_CODE = AZPS
SELLER_DUNS = 958982563
CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI
CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276
AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0
PATH_NAME = W/AZPS/AZPS-AZPS/FOURCORNE345 - FOURCORNE230//
POINT_OF_RECEIPT = FOURCORNE345
POINT_OF_DELIVERY = FOURCORNE230
SOURCE = FOURCORNERS3
SINK = PNPK
CAPACITY = 25
CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 25
SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY
TS_CLASS = FIRM
TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT
TS_PERIOD = OFF_PEAK
TS_WINDOW = FIXED
TS_SUBCLASS = WHEEL
NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1
OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default
START_TIME = 06/09/2002
STOP_TIME = 06/09/2002
CEILING_PRICE = 3.13
OFFER_PRICE = 3.13
BID_PRICE = 3.13
PRICE_UNITS = $/mW
PRECONFIRMED = YES
ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A
ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A
POSTING_REF = 0
SALE_REF =
REQUEST_REF =
DEAL_REF =
NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG =
STATUS = CONFIRMED
STATUS_NOTIFICATION = lisa.gang@enron.com
STATUS_COMMENTS =
TIME_QUEUED = 06/07/2002
RESPONSE_TIME_LIMIT =
TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 06/07/2002
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_COMMENTS =
CUSTOMER_COMMENTS = FOR INFO CALL (503)464-5070
SELLER_NAME = AZPS
SELLER_PHONE = 602.250.1128
SELLER_FAX = 602.250.1155
SELLER_EMAIL = oasisadm@apsc.com
CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801
CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272
CUSTOMER_EMAIL = bill.rust@enron.com
REASSIGNED_REF = 0
REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0
REASSIGNED_START_TIME =
REASSIGNED_STOP_TIME =


MARK YOUR LUNCH CALENDARS NOW !

You are invited to attend the EWS Brown Bag Lunch Series

Featuring:  MICHAEL L. MILLER

Topic:  Principal Investments

Thursday, May 17, 2001
11:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.
EB 5 C2

You bring your lunch,          Limited Seating
We provide drinks and dessert.        RSVP  e-mail Kathie Grabstald
                   or call x 3-9610


FYI - please continue sending this to Robin Rodrigue and change the book admins name to Lynn Pikofsky for the Chicago office(EMW).  Kevin Radous is no longer with the company.  Thanks.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schultz, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 4:10 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; Bike, Anne; Frank, Carole; Werner, Joy; Kulic, Sladana-Anna; Doan, Jad; Mills, Bruce; Videtto, Melissa; Hungerford, James; Singla, Kimat; Ames, Chuck; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Ryder, Patrick; Clause, Kristen; Bhatia, Randy; Royed, Jeff; O'Rourke, Ryan; Akers, Michelle; Jones, Monte; Pehlivanova, Biliana; Rodrigue, Robin
Subject:	risk p&l vs gl variances - August

Hello!

Here are the variances between the Risk P&L and the GL as of August 31 for the books that I handle.  Please call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Amanda
x 53334

 << File: Gas Three RM PMA Log 0801.xls >>


<<EPMIapr02sales.xls>>  Hi.  Here are the BPA Sales for April.  (I'll be in
a meeting from 1:00-5:00 today)


To all,

I spoke with Jan Aspuru (OUC) this morning.  He indicated the max volume they would take summer would be 60,000 mmbtu/day ten year term.  He went on to say that a winter drop to 50,000 mmbtu/day would help put our proposal in line with what they are currently looking at.  We should assume winter to be November - March.

Items to consider:

Scott - Is their a price drop to entice them into 60,000 baseload to gain access to the winter economics on the 10,000 drop.  i.e.  Do we offer Hub plus .53 for sixty baseload?  Something to consider and your call.  When LNG comes up, notice I said when, we can sculpt.

FM - standard natural gas industry language?  If LNG becomes cover, doesn't allow for any shipping delays, etc.
LD strategy - do we put caps on penalties or an out clause if nondelivery occurs for a certain number of days, presumably a number of months consecutively.

Timeline - We need to get a proposal to them by mid-month.  It appears a short negotiation period to close ends can be had after the previously mentioned July 1 deadline.  Short means about a month.

During our initial discussion, OUC suggested preferred pricing would be Gas Daily Zn 2 plus $.55.  We suggested with our risk management abilities we would consider any pricing they preferred and further suggested Index with the right to convert to Gas Daily or others.  Does the desk have a preference? - Gas Daily exposure seems better for us - but conversion could still be had even under a Gas Daily contract - need your thoughts.  In this regard, I have set a meeting with credit, Phil I'd like you to attend, at 9am tomorrow to begin the process.

Give these items some thought and I will schedule a meeting for Wednesday, June 6th at 4pm in 3259 to discuss.

Phil and I will continue to work toward that meeting.

Thanks for your assistance as we move forward to this agreement.

Regards,

Jared


Print on my business letterhead.

Naomi Leff
Naomi Leff & Associates
12 West 27th Street
New York, NY  10001
212 686 6300

Dear Naomi,

Thanks for the opportunity to work with you on my new home.  I've enclosed a
virtual tour disk (just follow the prompts), and some floor plans from my
architect.  If there is anything else you need, please call anytime.  I'm
excited for you to see the house in person, and have the chance to discover
my passion for 20th century design.  Dennis and Daniel have been a great
source of the best objects and knowledge.  Of course it is a primary concern
to make sure the home, the objects, the furnishings, and the space work
together.

Dennis and Daniel speak very highly of you and it is important to me that I
have the help to complete this project with great attention, and all that
results from that attention.

Best Regards,

Jeff


Sir:

Regarding the communications you keep sending to this office, be it via
e-mail, regular mail or whatever means you seem to deem necessary, as in the
attached, please note:

The following individuals herein are not registered lobbyists ) for Enron nor
anyone else ) and should henceforth not be considered as such:  Jeff
Dasovich, Sandi McCubbin, or Susan Mara.

Please cease your communications to the above-referenced individuals
immediately.

Your prompt implementation of this request would be sincerely appreciated.
Thanks,

Joseph Alamo

From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/24/2001 10:00 AM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Reminder letter for California filing deadline

Hi. Is there a reason I keep getting this stuff from these guys.

Sincerely,
Clueless
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/24/2001 09:54 AM -----

	Shieldsenron@aol.com
	04/23/2001 08:07 PM

		 To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Reminder letter for California filing deadline

 - dasovich.rl.ca.4-23-01.DOC


<! >
<! >
<! ATTENTION!>
<! You are reading this message because your mail reader cannot display HTML.>
<! If you would prefer to receive text messages from now on,>
<! click the link below or copy it into a web browser.>
<!
http://www.you-click.net/ClickAction?func=S_TurnOffHtml&partname=talbots&uid=76815142
>
<! >

<TITLE>Earn DOUBLE POINTS at Talbots this March</TITLE>

    <map name="map"><area shape="rect" coords="5,20,347,316" href="http://www.you-click.net/GoNow/a10044a52490a76815142a0"><area shape="rect" coords="272,317,341,335" href="http://www.you-click.net/GoNow/a10044a52490a76815142a1"><area shape="rect" coords="122,336,238,375" href="http://www.you-click.net/GoNow/a10044a52490a76815142a0"></map>

    <map name="map2"><area shape="rect" coords="7,2,210,79" href="http://www.you-click.net/GoNow/a10044a52490a76815142a0"></map>

		Click here to change or remove your subscription.


I spoke to Barry Margolis this afternoon and he  confirmed Stacey's planned
departure from Baker Botts.? Barry has spoken to  Stacy over the past week
about it.??Stacey will be going to Goldman  Sachs October 1 to develop tax
products.
?
Barry would like to set-up a metting with you to  discuss this.? He doesn't
think that anyone at Baker Botts has the depth  that Stacy has.? He is also
concerned about certain issues that may need to  be dealt with at year-end.?
Therefore, it sounds like we need to find a  qualified replacement.


Herewith a few ideas for the October meeting in London, some of them
after checking with Paul Portney and with Pankaj. I offer these very, very
preliminary thoughts just to start you thinking - do you want your UK
colleagues on the program; do we want some ancillary events? After getting
your views on questions such as these, I can make more definite suggestions.
I certainly think that we should convene a few hours before the opening
dinner so that the advisors can have a tour of the building and the
facilities. Also, I am hoping that Steve will leave some time on this trip
for a tour of the new BA headquarters - very innovative.
We should consider doing something on the global warming question from the
viewpoint of the Europeans. Start with three recommendations on the political
side that Paul received from David Victor of the Council on Foreign Relations
(characterized as "a VERY smart guy on climate"):
Tony Brenton (Deputy chief of mission, UK embassy in DC.  Has been on UK
climate delegations for a decade; smart and lively; pragmatic; insightful).
Bo Kjellen (Swedish head of delegation; knows European politics inside out;
big figure in Europe).
Tubiana, Laurence (Conseil d'Analyse Economique, France; knows the issue and
can speak to French position, but may not have the gravitas of Kjellen or
Brenton).
Among other ideas (I have winnowed out several) is a guy named Liam
Salter at Climate Network Europe. Brussels based, but relatively junior. Paul
also recommends a woman by the name of Laurence Tubiana, an economist in the
French government's equivalent of the CEA; she has a reputation as a good
presenter and a good economist.
WOULD YOU PLEASE CHECK THESE FOLKS OUT WITH YOUR LONDON PEOPLE, AND GET
ADDITIONAL NAMES FROM THEM. THE GOAL IS TO GIVE ALL OF US A PERSPECTIVE ON
THE EUROPEAN VIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES - UNLESS YOU THINK THAT NOT A
USEFUL TOPIC.
I turn now to Pankaj's suggestion, which I transmit verbatim: "I remember
promising to scout around and see if there were a European whom it would be
interesting to invite to talk to the Enron International Advisory Council
about the (non) convergence of governance structures in Europe, particularly
on the Continent, to the U.S. model.  I got the following names from Jay
Lorsch (apparently all members of the committee steering a multifaculty
Harvard business School project on governance in comparative perspective) as
possibilities.  Jay suggested that Sihler would be best (former CEO of
Henkel, very senior),  Peter's second best (apparently, chairman of Amsterdam
Stock Exchange now) and Smith - formerly Managing partner at Price Waterhouse
Coopers - would be the most junior of the three.  I don't personally know any
of the three."
Now some ideas of my own, again acting on the assumption that we want a
two-way educational dialogue - to give your folks in London and Europe a
run-down on the situation in the US, and the US contingent a better
understanding of how European policymakers view the issues we all face.
1.Bill Kristol on the US political scene, in which there is great
interest here, and great misunderstanding of the Bush administration. We
might also consider inviting Larry Lindsey or some other Bush person if
allowed to do so.
2. Someone on the European view on global warming (see suggestions above).
3. Energy regulation in the UK. Callum McCarthy.
4. Economic outlook. Gavyn Davies (usual talk).
5. What went wrong in California (great interest in that over here) and
how to fix it. Steve could do this, or you could invite Bill Hogan (just
joking) or the chairman of FERC if we are allowed to pay his way.
6. Motivating people in a multinational, multicultural organization. If
this is of interest, I can get recommendations for speakers.
7. I would be inclined to add a high-level speaker on the state of
US-UK-European relations, perhaps as a dinner speaker. Between Gavyn and me,
we might be able to get Chancellor Gordon Brown, a very interesting guy, and
the inventor of the "climate change levy" that is driving industry in this
country nuts.
Please look this over. Steve and I have to get together, preferably with
Ken, which leads me to suggest Aspen during the Institute's energy forum,
which I understand Ken will be attending. But if that is not feasible, Steve
and I can work out a date for a preliminary meeting, followed up by one with
Ken at his convenience.
END


__________________________________

jcrew.com
__________________________________

great news - we've just added even more items to our clearance sale...
take up to 70% off over 400 of our best summer styles!
http://click.jcrew.com/cgi-bin8/flo?y=eF1X0Sgo10B8s0JI30At

...but hurry - quantities are limited. (translation: get 'em now!)

Unsubscribe:  To be removed from the jcrew.com
mailing list, please go to
http://click.jcrew.com/cgi-bin8/flo?y=eF1X0Sgo10B8s0JI40Au&email=lcampbel@enron.com


Dear Ken,

I wrote you some time back about the campaign to raise ca. $4 million to
replace the American Heart Association's Houston regional headquarters
building which burned this past April.  You were so kind in putting us in
touch with Cindy Olson and Misha Siegel to discuss Enron's corporate
position and the potential for assistance from the Ken and Linda Lay
Foundation.  We deeply appreciated our meeting with Cindy and Misha.

Things have been progressing I'm pleased to say.  AHA has concluded a deal
to sell the restored old building for approximately $1.15 million, and we
have received substantial commitments from a very few individuals and
Houston area foundations totaling approximately $600,000.  Therefore, our
remaining challenge is to raise around $2-$2.25 million to complete the
funding of a new building that will meet the needs of AHA in the years to
come.

We have not yet been able to identify a very visible corporate or
professional lead for the effort.  We will be discussing this possibility
with Ernie Cockrell on November 6th.  As part of that conversation we would
like to indicate notable leaders in Houston who would be willing to have
their names affiliated with the capital campaign, perhaps as an Executive
Committee or Advisory Committee.  The question to you is:  Would you approve
the use of your name in your capacity at Enron and/or the name of the Ken
and Linda Lay Foundation in this way?

Again, the AHA and I have been so deeply appreciative of your willingness to
support the American Heart Association for so many years.  I hope we can
call on you for this additional assistance at a time of need.

Thanks, Ken, for your consideration.

Best regards,

Mike Stinson
Conoco Inc.

 - C.DTF


- Oral Argument Request.doc


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/09/01.   Please note that
there are 12 counterparty additions/revisions to the Watchlist for this week.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000 11:30
AM ---------------------------

Darla Saucier@ENRON
12/21/2000 01:50 PM
To: Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pam B
Boxx/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 11/2000 Oglethorpe

Hi Judy,

I spoke with Chris Germany yesterday and he said that you were going to take
care of fixing the Oglethorpe deal.  An unhappy Doug Jones from Oglethorpe
called me yesterday.  He is wanting to get the corrected invoice ASAP so he
can have the wire to us before year end.  If he doesn't get the invoice
today, he will not pay us until after the first of the year.

Please let me know when to expect the changes to come across so I can forcast
the cash receipt in our system for treasury and also let Doug know when the
invoice will be faxed over to him.

Thanks to everyone involved for all of your help.  Merry Christmas!

Darla


----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 11/01/2000 11:29 AM -----

	US Publishing <season@restructuringtoday.com>
	11/01/2000 10:26 AM
	Please respond to season

		 To: "RT Reader" <season@restructuringtoday.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Special Bulletin

(see attached file:  bulletin.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
1-800-486-8201
www.restructuringtoday.com
season@restructuringtoday.com

 - bulletin.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000
04:43 PM ---------------------------

TIM HEIZENRADER
07/05/2000 03:18 PM
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re:

We've never used the CEMS data, so I don't know anything about its level of
accuracy. As far as use of the WSCC data goes, I noticed that you've got
table entries and are showing '0' values for a  lot of plants that have never
reported reliably, such as Hermiston, Gadsby, Priest Rapids, Wanapum, etc.--
I'd leave those out until we see some plausible data reported. Also, we don't
use data from plants where better numbers are available from other sources,
e.g. most Pacific Northwest federal hydro.

Also, are you doing anything to filter out bad hours? There are intermittent
periods where series of zeros or series of identical readings are erroneously
reported due to telemetry failures. If you're computing totals or averages
from the WSCC data that are consistently smaller than known, accurate
reports, then this might be the cause.

Tim

Matthew Lenhart
07/05/2000 01:59 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT, Cooper
Richey/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:

Enclosed is a copy of the generation reports we put together using your
generation database.  Please look them over and make sure that they are in
the correct order an make sense.  Some of the monthly averages in the report
do not match the CEMS database number.  I wanted to know if I should fill in
the historicals with the CEMS numbers or keep these.  If you could just look
these over and let me know if they make sense I would appriciate it.

Matt Lenhart


All,

We will be scheduling interviews for the Trading Track, Wednesday, May 30th
from 1.00 pm to approximately 4.00 pm with a debrief afterwards.    We will
be interviewing approximately 12 - 16 candidates (both internal and external).

Please reserve this time in your calander.    If you are unable to particpate
please let me know otherwise you will be contacted with regards to
location/confirmed times/resumes/etc shortly.

Any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

Kind regards,

Karen.
x54667


Kelly,
I'm gonna be early this week.(for once)

I'll take Dallas as my loser this week.

Talk to you later.
Theresa


Aimee-

Gas control has some line work scheduled for 1/4,5,6 that will affect the
referenced point.  Dynegy has nom'd 1800 at this point which I'm assuming
they'll want baseload for January.  The desk also appears to have some gas
nom'd out here (approx 1200mm).   Rather than cut these volumes, would you
try to negotiate with Koch not to flow this gas during the outage, but to
make it up as soon as the outage is over (they may be able to begin flow on
1/6)?  Please let me know as soon as possible.

Thanks.


We had to leave the official severance date at 12/31/01. Sorry.


As a follow-up to our conversation in London when you said I should bring to
your attention any concerns I might have with financial trading issues, the
following has recently come up as an issue here in Houston (and does so from
time to time).   We will, in fact, be discussing it at our group meeting next
week.   I spoke to Edmund about it when I was there in London, but in light
of the recent Canadian form problems and the resulting concerns of Mark
Haedicke with the integrity of our forms, I thought I should bring this your
attention.

 One of our continuing concerns on the financial trading side is that every
financial trading lawyer/paralegal work from the centrally approved forms.
The Houston forms are currently located in a "read-only" directory.  We need
to be careful that users copy the forms out of the directory each time they
use the form.  Copying the form into a personal directory for ease of use
creates issues with people working from outdated base forms, or having forms
evolve without  approval.

Another way forms get changed without going through the approval process is
when an attorney tells the paralegals to make a change in every swap
agreement they approve.  It counts as a form change, not a negotiation
change, if you make it in every agreement.

Ultimately our goal is to centralize the forms in a database easily
accessible to all of us on a global basis (this is a central and critical
component of the Fishkin Project).

Thanks for your attention to this.


Imelda,

Look on the Texas tab.  I've made some comments beside the names.  These
adjustments are for HPLC and Texas.  We no longer handel EFSC.

D

Imelda Frayre
04/05/2000 04:46 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Sitara Security

Daren, I'm in the process of updating the Sitara Security Administrator
database and I need to confirm that the necessary users have access to EFSC,
HPLC and Texas along with the correct roles.  I have attached a file that
lists the users that are currently in the database.  Please verify that these
users currently have access to the proper desk and have the correct role
given their function.  If there are some users that I have not listed, please
update that information in your reply.  If you have any questions or think
that I need to contact someone else for this request, please call me at
x35423.  Thanks for your help.

Imelda


Please forward to James Scribner.  He will call with his e:mail address.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000 09:40 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rick Causey @ ENRON                           01/17/2000 06:04 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Global Risk Management Operations

Recognizing Enron,s increasing worldwide presence in the wholesale energy
business and the need to insure outstanding internal controls for all of our
risk management activities, regardless of location, a global risk management
operations function has been created under the direction of Sally W. Beck,
Vice President.  In this role, Sally will report to Rick Causey, Executive
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer.

Sally,s responsibilities with regard to Global Risk Management Operations
will mirror those of other recently created Enron global functions.  In this
role, Sally will work closely with all Enron geographic regions and wholesale
companies to insure that each entity receives individualized regional support
while also focusing on the following global responsibilities:

1. Enhance communication among risk management operations professionals.
2. Assure the proliferation of best operational practices around the globe.
3. Facilitate the allocation of human resources.
4. Provide training for risk management operations personnel.
5. Coordinate user requirements for shared operational systems.
6. Oversee the creation of a global internal control audit plan for risk
management activities.
7. Establish procedures for opening new risk management operations offices
and create key benchmarks for measuring on-going risk controls.

Each regional operations team will continue its direct reporting relationship
within its business unit, and will collaborate with Sally in the delivery of
these critical items. The Houston-based risk management operations team under
Sue Frusco,s leadership, which currently supports risk management activities
for South America and Australia, will also report directly to Sally.

Sally retains her role as Vice President of  Energy Operations for Enron
North America, reporting to the ENA Office of the Chairman.  She has been in
her current role over Energy Operations since 1997, where she manages risk
consolidation and reporting, risk management administration, physical product
delivery, confirmations and cash management for ENA,s physical commodity
trading, energy derivatives trading and financial products trading.

Sally has been with Enron since 1992, when she joined the company as a
manager in Global Credit.  Prior to joining Enron,  Sally had four years
experience as a commercial banker and spent seven years as a registered
securities principal with a regional investment banking firm.  She also owned
and managed a retail business for several years.

Please join me in supporting Sally in this additional coordination role for
global risk management operations.


Geoff,

Below are applications and directories we would like to copy over.
I also have improved models on my C: & H: drive that I've been working on and testing to replace existing models, that is why I have listed those drives as well.
I will send you others if I think of any more.
Please let me know if you have any questions.

Rgds,
Sheetal
x36740

Applications:
Lim
Kobra
CQG
Exotica
Twinexcel
ERMS
Exceed
PortCalc, aka runM
TAGG
DCAF
Sitara
Global Counterparties
Global CreditAG
Global Contracts
RAC
ACT

Files or Directories:
O:/Midmarket/Lagrasta
O:/Liquids/Liquids
O:/Gas_Model
spatel2$ on 'nahoutrd-uv6' (H:)
Local Disk (C:) (Sheetal)

Scripts:
W:\Scripts\gasmodel.vbs "o:\gas_model\gasmodel_kobra.xls"
W:\Scripts\crudemodel.vbs O:\Gas_Model\Crude\Crude_Kobra.xls

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lagrasta, Fred
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:05 PM
To:	Patel, Sheetal
Subject:	FW: NETCO

Sheetal, Will you please handle this.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:16 AM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Arnold, John; Arora, Harry; Belden, Tim; Black, Don; Breslau, Craig; Calger, Christopher F.; Davies, Derek; Davis, Mark Dana; Devries, Paul; Duran, W. David; Forster, David; Foster, Chris H.; Grigsby, Mike; Herndon, Rogers; Lagrasta, Fred; Luce, Laura; Thomas, Jake; Milnthorp, Rob; Neal, Scott; Presto, Kevin M.; Shively, Hunter S.; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Swerzbin, Mike; Vickers, Frank; Tycholiz, Barry; Neal, Scott; Presto, Kevin M.; Shively, Hunter S.; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Swerzbin, Mike; Vickers, Frank; Tycholiz, Barry; Haedicke, Mark E.; Bradford, William S.; Colwell, Wes; Beck, Sally; Hall Jr., Robert L.; Hodges, Georgeanne; Patrick, Michael K.; Buy, Rick; Port, David; Oxley, David; Rub, Jenny; Webb, Jay; Forster, David; Zufferli, John; Badeer, Robert; Rosman, Stewart; Motley, Matt; Choi, Paul; Heizenrader, Tim; Will, Lloyd; Arora, Harry; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Curry, Mike; Duran, W. David; Robinson, Mitch; Gaskill, Chris; Le Dain, Eric; Redmond, Brian; Douglas, Steve H.  (Tax)
Cc:	Koehler, Anne C.; Lavorato, John; Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	NETCO

As we move forward in the planning stages for NETCO we need to identify all systems which need to be moved or copied into the entity.  We have identified the great majority of the systems to be moved but we may not be able to identify particular tools used by your group or you individually.  This would include spreadsheets etc.

Please send lists of systems and software required to Anne Koehler by close of business today.

To be clear we can (subject to the negotiation) move/copy systems and some data however, we CANNOT move either transaction data if counterparty specific or data obtained from a counterparty under a confidentiality agreement.

For Houston traders, Geof Storey is compiling your lists.

Thanks

Louise


Please see attached description.  This is going to be a new product.  Please call it US Gas Phys Kern Las Vegas.

Thanks,
Mike
x37031


Please print out two copies in COLOR.

BT

-----Original Message-----
From: Crozier, Margie [mailto:Margie.Crozier@neg.pge.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 12:07 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: PG&E Corporation Announcement

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

May 4, 2001 5:00pm through May 7, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:       ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

Impact:  EBS
Time:  Fri 5/4/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/4/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/4/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/4/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/5/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/5/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London
Outage:  CGMP removal on MSFCs (EBS)
Environments Impacted:  EBS
Purpose: Possible fix for multicast problems. Neal Symms is still reporting
difficulties with multicast and Tibco.
Backout: Place 'ip cgmp' back on the interfaces
Contact(s):  Dennis McGough    713-345-3143

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


I just got a call from Stuart Rosman, who is meeting with the referenced
counterparty right now.  NCPA would like to get a password in place today to
start trading, and there seems to be some confusion as to what types of
transactions they can do online.  Per my earlier approval, this counterparty
can trade any physical products under the credit terms established by
Credit.  They, however, cannot trade financial until we get an ISDA Master in
place (and have told Stuart they are currently not interested in trading
financial).

Stuart said he would be calling Carrie in about 1/2 to make sure this message
is conveyed to her.

If anyone is aware of any problems here, please convey them to Carrie ASAP!


As a reminder...there are several pieces of equipment that are set up on the 30th Floor, as well as on our floor, for the Disaster Recovery Team.  PLEASE DO NOT TAKE, BORROW OR USE this equipment.  Should you need to use another computer system, other than yours, or make conference calls please work with your Assistant to help find or set up equipment for you to use.

Thanks for your understanding in this matter.

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


HEre's the resume of someone that Lloyd met at a conference this week.  It
looks like she has a lot of experience -- some of it  power related, and
might be worth an interview.  Didn't want to send it to Michelle, since I'm
not sure when she's taking over the recruiting stuff.  Let me know if I can
help further.
Regards,
Janice

EB3861
Assistant General Counsel, Enron North America Corp.
713-853-1794 (Fax:  713-646-4842)
----- Forwarded by Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000 10:25 AM -----

	Lloyd Will
	10/27/2000 08:48 AM

		 To: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Alice Ginsburgh resume

Janice attached is the resume for Alice Ginsburgh.

Take care.

---------------------- Forwarded by Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000 08:45 AM
---------------------------

ARLGin@aol.com on 10/27/2000 08:29:54 AM
To: lloyd.will@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Alice Ginsburgh resume

Dear Lloyd---I really enjoyed meeting you yesterday at the Greater Houston
Partnership luncheon and truly appreciate your prompt inquiries on my behalf!
 Attached are a resume, "highlights sheet" and summary of recent assignments
which outline my experience as a corporate attorney.  As I had mentioned,
there are two emphases in my generalist career: (1) finance and transactions;
and (2) labor and employment law.  Along the way I have also addressed
anti-trust, corporate secretarial, environmental, some intellectual property
and some real estate matters.  In the marketing/trading arena, you will see
the reference to ISDA's and GISB's plus commodities swap and futures trading
agreements.  I look forward to sitting down with you and/or others in the
Enron organization to detail my background in person.  Please let me know if
there is any problem opening this document.

Again, thank you for "putting my name in the ring" .  I hope we can meet
again soon.
                                                        Alice Ginsburgh

 - ARLG Resume.doc


Dawn,

I have not seen a request form for his contract.  I believe that Teresa Bien
was working on it with Mark Haedicke.  I am copying her on this email so that
if I am mistaken, she can let me know.

Thanks.

Michelle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.

	Dawn Doucet
	06/21/2000 10:01 AM

		 To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Contract/Keohane

What's the status, Michelle?  Peter was asking yesterday - I told him we
might have something to him this week - was I lying??


---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 07/03/2001
10:59 AM ---------------------------
From: Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/03/2001 10:37 AM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: LV valley endures blackouts

  Now here's an "unintended" consequence:  price caps cause less supply to be
available (marketers cannot sell above cap and generators must be subject to
cost filings if they do) and the result is black outs.

Alan

 Tuesday, July 03, 2001
Copyright , Las Vegas Review-Journal

POWER SHORTAGES: LV valley endures blackouts
Utility officials expect supplies to stay tight as hot weather continues this
week

By JOHN G. EDWARDS
REVIEW-JOURNAL

The first rolling blackouts in Southern Nevada history hit the Las Vegas
Valley on Monday with a speed that surprised even Nevada Power Co.

The utility company declared a red alert and initiated rolling blackouts that
left an estimated 10,000 customers without power. It had reported 70,000
customers were affected but later revised the number of customers who lost
electricity.

The blackouts started at 4:10 p.m. and ended at 4:55 p.m., the utility said.

Nevada Power attributed the power shortages to several factors: unusually
high temperatures for this time of year, three generation unit outages, the
area's rapid growth, power shortages in California and, possibly, the
wholesale power price caps that federal regulators imposed last month.

"What killed us was the temperature was unbelievable," said Paul Heagan, vice
president of Sierra Pacific Resources, the holding company for Nevada Power.
The Las Vegas temperature soared to a near-record 114 degrees.

As for the rest of the week, "power (supply) is going to be tight," Heagan
said. "The prospects this week are kind of tough to call."

The company logged record demand for power: 4,421 megawatts at 5:05 p.m.
Monday. The previous all-time high was 4,325 megawatts on Aug. 1. A megawatt
is roughly the amount of power needed to supply 750 houses.

By contrast, on July 2 last year, the utility hit 3,300 megawatts when the
temperature was 107 degrees, Heagan said.

The company targeted nonemergency areas for Monday's rolling blackouts, which
affected mostly residential customers.

Nevada Power spokesmen declined to identify the affected areas even after the
emergency was over. Witnesses said power went out in one area of the
Northwest and one area of the east valley.

Electricity customers in the affected areas said the blackouts lasted between
20 and 45 minutes.

Several traffic signals went out, including those at the intersections of
Buffalo Drive and Lake Mead Boulevard, Tenaya Way and Lake Mead, and Boulder
Highway at U.S. Highway 95. Las Vegas Police Department officials reported
few traffic problems because of the blackouts.

For the most part, people reported few problems.

"We only had a few customers, and we couldn't do Western Union transactions
without a computer, but with the other customers we just winged it," said
Michelle Hitt, a customer service representative at Mail Boxes Etc., 7500 W.
Lake Mead Blvd. Hitt said power at his store was out about 45 minutes.

Across the street, an assistant manager for the Vons supermarket at 7530 W.
Lake Mead Blvd. said customers could not check out when the store's power
turned off.

The Roadhouse Grill at Lake Mead Boulevard and Tenaya Way was shut down for
about 25 minutes shortly after 4 p.m., restaurant manager Kim Tuerk said.

"We had to evacuate the building because of health department and fire codes,
but it was no big deal," he said.

Heagan said Nevada Power will start its rolling blackouts in other areas of
the valley if it needs to cut power again this week.

The utility's policy calls for no notification to areas that will lose power,
unlike California, where a minimum of 24 hours notice is required.

Nevada Power fears that notification would be used by burglars to locate
unoccupied houses during the emergency.

Tim Hay, state consumer advocate, said he thinks customers in affected areas
should be notified of possible outages. "They need to provide notice to
affected areas, at least in general areas" to help people prepare, Hay said.

Elsewhere in the valley, consumers and businesses continued operating
normally during the emergency.

Meadows mall General Manager Frank Wheat said power was not affected at the
shopping center.

"We know rolling blackouts can occur," he said. "We do have backup generators
for emergency lighting during hours of darkness, but not for all the stores."

Spokespeople at University Medical Center and Sunrise Hospital also said they
were not affected by Monday's blackouts and have their own backup power
supplies.

Minta Albietz, vice president of maternal-child services at Sunrise:

"We have our own little power plant in the back. We can generate our own
power for 30 days, longer as long as we have fuel."

The company said its power woes began Friday when it internally declared a
yellow alert and warned employees that it was running short of power, Heagan
said.

On Friday, Nevada Power customers were pulling down 4,300 megawatts, the
second- or third-highest peak in the company history, he said.

Meanwhile, one of Nevada Power's electrical generation units at the Reid
Gardner site 50 miles north of Las Vegas has been down since Friday because
of a leaking boiler, he said. Also, Southern California Edison, which
operates the Mohave Generating Station at Laughlin for several utilities,
notified the company Friday that two of Nevada Power's units were down.

Nevada Power said it was able to obtain additional power on the spot market
and avoid blackouts last week and did not need to seek any power use
curtailment by major users.

The yellow alert continued through the weekend, a period when electric
consumption usually declines because businesses are closed and many people
are driving around.

The company made arrangements to buy another 250 megawatts of electricity
Monday when most businesses reopened. "That got eaten up by early afternoon,"
Heagan said.

The utility said casinos reduced about 50 megawatts by switching to backup
generators and starting conservation measures. But several Strip casino
operators said they received no requests to conserve power or to turn on
their backup generation units.

"Nevada Power hasn't asked us to shed (power) load," said Debbie Munch, Park
Place Entertainment spokeswoman. "They asked us to cut our power usage a
couple of times last summer, and we did so. If they do ask us, we'll do what
we can to help the community."

Mandalay Resort Group and MGM Mirage executives said they were not asked to
cut their power use Monday.

"Our facilities guys said nobody's asked us for anything, and we haven't done
anything," said Fred Lewis, Aladdin spokesman.

"At first glance, it appears the problem was handled very well," said Don
Soderberg, chairman of the Public Utilities Commission, which regulates
Nevada Power.

"It's always hard to predict when we're going to have abnormal temperatures,
and power plants are going to go off-line," Soderberg said. The situation, he
added, "underlines the need to build more power plants."

Monday's 114-degree high was one degree shy of the record for the date. The
heat follows the warmest May on record, said Joe Nemeth, a senior forecaster
with the National Weather Service. Temperatures are expected to stay warm but
tapering off as the week progresses and the risk for thunderstorms increases,
meteorologists reported.

Highs will stay in the triple-digit range, but drop to 110 degrees today, 105
on Wednesday, 106 on Thursday and 103 on Friday. A less than 20 percent
chance for rain exists today, a chance that increases to 30 percent
Wednesday.

Forecasters expect a 40 to 50 percent chance of rain the rest of the week.

This story is located at:
http://www.lvrj.com/lvrj_home/2001/Jul-03-Tue-2001/news/16458159.html


One year is the non solicitation period.  June 1, 2001 through May 31, 2002.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cash, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 2:42 PM
To:	Mayes, Fran
Cc:	Slone, Jeanie
Subject:	FW:

Fran, do you know this off the top of your head?  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Slone, Jeanie
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 2:23 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Cc:	Sweet, Twanda
Subject:

Hey guys,
Do we have written in any document from the sale of HPL what the time limit is on recruiting from AEP?  The recruiter's need further clarification on when we are all clear.


Attached is the Enron Employee Referral Form and resume of my friend Patty
Young, which I will be submitting to two groups for consideration.  Please
let me know if anything else is needed.


Ryan Thomas will be in our office tomorrow morning to interview for a Real Time trading position on our E. Power 24 hour desk.  Please confirm your availability to interview Ryan:

9:00 - 9:30 Don Baughman
9:30 - 10:00 Juan Hernandez
10:00 - 10:30 Kayne Coulter
10:30 - 11:00 John Forney

Thanks,
Johnny


Beginning this week, we are actively testing the changes to Path Manager to
receive real-time deal updates from Sitara.  To prepare for this, we would
like to have a limited group of schedulers from each desk go thru a quick
walkthru/training of the new features sometime early next week.  This should
only take about 30 minutes.  Once they are comfortable with the features and
performance, and once the testing is complete, we would like to migrate this
to Unify Production either next week or the week after.  This should give us
an adequate adjustment period prior to the next bid week.

Once it is migrated to Production, we can either roll it out to all
schedulers or to selected schedulers via security.

Heather, could you please schedule some time with the designated schedulers,
Scotty, and myself early next week.  A room with a projector would work best.

Thanks, d.n.


FEMALE FLYERS

As the airliner pushed back from the gate, the flight attendant gave the
passergers the usual information regarding seat belts etc. Finally, she said,
"Now sit back and enjoy your trip while your captain, Judith Campbell and
crew take you safely to your destination."?

Joe sitting in the 8th row thought to himself, "Did hear her right; is the
captain a woman? I think I better have scotch and soda. When the attendants
came by with drink cart, he said, "Did I understand you right?  Is the
captain a woman?"

"Yes," said the attendant, "In fact, this entire crew is female."

"My God," said Joe, "I'd better have two scotch and sodas. I don't know what
to think of all those women up there in the cockpit."

"That's another thing," said the attendant, "We no longer call it the
cockpit."


They're great...awesome country music.  Don't be too scared.


When: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US
& Canada).
Where: EB3335

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


Rachel Davis
760 El Verano Dr.
Walnut Creek, CA 94598
rdavis@powerlight.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Rachel Davis


Mac,

I checked into executing my options with Smith Barney.  Bad news.  Enron has
an agreement with Paine Webber that is exclusive.  Employees don't have the
choice of where to exercise.  I still would like to get to the premier
service account, but I will have to transfer the money.

Hopefully this will reach you.

Phillip


?
?

 - image001.jpg


Cheryl:

Anna called me at about 5 pm this evening and would like for you to give her
a status call first thing in the morning.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


For those of you who plan on taking vacation this week, please provide me with a number where you can be reached, just in case we need to reach you.

Thanks!
Laura


I was thinking about you and just wanted to check to make sure you're o.k.

Carolyn H. Ashley
Training & Development Manager
Port of Houston Authority
Phone:  (713) 670-2619
Fax:  (713) 670-2457
E-mail:  cashley@poha.com


We are pretty much wrapped up.

Thanks Matt.

Cara Semperger
West Power Scheduling Supervisor
Enron North America
503/464-3814


In order to better align our engineering and operations capabilities with the
commercial businesses they support, we are pleased to announce the following
organizational change will be effective immediately.  A new business unit,
Enron Engineering and Operational Services (EEOS), is being formed which will
include our existing operations in Enron Engineering and Construction Company
(EE&CC), Operational Energy Corporation (OEC), and National Energy Production
Corporation (NEPCO).

Brian Stanley, as President and Chief Executive Officer, and Keith Dodson, as
Chief Operating Officer will provide the leadership for this new
organization, reporting to the Office of the Chairman of Enron Wholesale
Services.  NEPCO will continue to operate as a stand-alone business under
John Gillis, President.

With the majority of EE&CC and OEC,s activities focused on assets and
projects which are in Wholesale Services, this will better align the efforts
of EEOS with the commercial businesses it supports.  While EEOS will be a
stand-alone unit within Enron Wholesale Services it will work very closely
with and have direct accountability to the business units it supports.

This realignment also centralizes our engineering and operations capabilities
in a single business segment and should ensure that innovation and best
practices are shared and implemented across our many operations and will also
allow for better identification of priorities and more effective allocation
of resources to these projects.  Consistent with this approach, Development
Engineering will have dual reporting to both EEOS and the business units
which they support.

With an extensive and varied portfolio of assets around the world and a wide
variety of new development opportunities available to Enron, it is critical
that we continue to maintain the best in class capability to design,
construct, commission, and effectively manage and operate Enron,s assets on a
global basis.

This new global business unit should insure that we will continue to enhance
these demonstrated capabilities and provide us with a sustainable advantage
as we advance our business strategy around the world.

Please join us in congratulating Brian and Keith on their new assignments.

Mark Frevert & Dave Delainey


It's not clear to me that our draft of the referenced agreement is the
latest.  Mark thought London may have made some additional changes.  Can you
email me the latest draft.  Thanks!