Jay:  my mistake - Salt River did send a CSA (see below)  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject:	FW: FW: Master purchase/sale agreement - Salt River

Jay:  Per my ovice mail.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 11:28 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject:	RE: FW: Master purchase/sale agreement - Salt River

Jay,  Can you send a credit worksheet to Sara for an ISDA for Salt River Project?

Sara, I am attaching the SRP documents.

Let me know if you guys need anything else.  What do you think the timing is on getting a credit worksheet together and a review of their docs?

Thanks,

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 11:13 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Cc:	Williams, Jason R (Credit); Ngo, Tracy
Subject:	RE: FW: Master purchase/sale agreement - Salt River

Kim:

Legal and credit have never responded on this one since there was no activity.  We will have to do a comparison of the CP form.  We also need credit since nothing has happened since 1999.

Can you resend the email version which Salt River sent to you?

Jay and/or Tracy:  Who will prepare credit?

Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:28 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	FW: FW: Master purchase/sale agreement

Sara,

Mark Russell of Salt River Project sent me their ISDA documents last week.  Can we take a look at them and make the changes we would like to incorporate?  He called this morning and they are considering financial transactions with us.  Please give me a call and let me know where we stand with this when you get a chance.  If I should send it on to some one else.  Please let me know that as well.

Thanks,

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	marussel@srpnet.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-marussel+40srpnet+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 4:12 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	RE: FW: Master purchase/sale agreement

I would like to begin working on an ISDA, I have attached our standard form
schedule and CSA for your review.  I think this is a good window of
opportunity.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim.Ward@enron.com [mailto:Kim.Ward@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 9:13 AM
To: marussel@srpnet.com
Subject: Re: FW: Master purchase/sale agreement

Mark,

The best person to talk to about the ISDA is me.  I discussed an ISDA with
Tim Roberts when I was in the Salt River offices on March 23rd.  A draft
ISDA was sent to Bill Abraham on November 17, 1999.  I requested for a new
legal review on 3/28/01.  Let me know if you need a new draft and I can
send you or Tim a copy.  My number is 713-853-0685.

Thanks for your inquiry -

Kim Ward

marussel@srpnet.com on 04/05/2001 08:20:15 AM

To:   <Kim.Ward@enron.com>
cc:   <marussel@srpnet.com>
Subject:  FW: Master purchase/sale agreement

I have been trying to get an ISDA going with Enron for several months. Who
is the best contact to call?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim.Ward@enron.com [mailto:Kim.Ward@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 2:59 PM
To: kaprice@srpnet.com
Subject: Master purchase/sale agreement

Kent,

Attached is a draft copy of our Master Purchase/Sale Agreement for physical
natural gas transactions.  As I mentioned before, we can enter into
transactions for less that one year out.  However, for those outside of a
year and for longer terms, we need to have a master in place.  Hopefully,
we can get this one in place so that we will be prepared when/if we get
ready to transact.

Let me know if you have any questions.  I will have our legal guys standing
by to help, too.

Thanks,

Kim Ward

(See attached file: Master_NG_draft_contract.doc)

(See attached file: Master_NG_draft_contract.doc)

 - 070301.sample Paragraph13 credit annex isda.doc << File: 070301.sample Paragraph13 credit annex isda.doc >>
 - 062701.sample isda schedule.doc << File: 062701.sample isda schedule.doc >>


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                  MAY 31, 2001

Notice ID: 2766
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: CAPACITY UPDATE EFFECTIVE FOR FRIDAY THROUGH SUNDAY, JUNE 1-3, 2001

             CHANGES ARE INDICATED WITH AN *

Effective Friday through Sunday, June 1-3, 2001, capacities will be as
follows:

Excess MDWQ              Available +
ISS Withdrawals          Available
SIT Withdrawals          Available
Imbalance Drawdowns      Available
PAL Lends/Unparks        Available

Excess MDIQ              Not Available + *
ISS Injections           Not Available   *
SIT Injections           Not Available   *
Imbalance Paybacks       Not Available   *
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks  Not Available   *

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Receipt capacity will be as follows:

TENNESSEE:

Brinker (B12)            20,000
Broad Run (B9)          450,000
Cambridge (B10)          10,000
Dungannon (B11)          40,000
Highland (B17)           25,000
Milford (B18)            30,000
North Greenwood (B22)    10,000
Unionville (B15)         75,000

TEXAS EASTERN:

Delmont (C16)                 0
Eagle (C22)              30,000
Hooker (C9)              25,000
Pennsburg (C23)          50,000
Windridge (C12)          60,000

NATIONAL FUEL:

Independence (M1)        10,000
Ellwood City (L1)        10,000

TRANSCO:

Downingtown (E3)          5,000
Emporia I (E13)         120,000
Rockville (E2)           65,000
Dranesville (E1)         25,000

ALGONQUIN:

Ramapo (R1)              50,000

ANR:

Paulding/Cecil          100,000
(F1, A2)

LEBANON AGGREGATE       225,000
(A4, F2, C4, D3)

TOLEDO AGGREGATE        225,000
(A3, F4, 734462)

COLUMBIA GULF:
(801)

TCO-Leach             2,218,000

Internal point non-firm capacity will be as follows:

Lanham                No Restrictions

Delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

TRANSCO:

Martins Creek (MA 21)    25,000
Young Woman's Creek       5,000
   (MA 36)

ALGONQUIN:

Hanover (MA 22)         143,000

EQUITRANS:

Fallen Timber (MA 35)    35,000
(MLI K1)

Waynesburg-Rhinehart     30,000
(MA 26) (MLI K2)

OPT-30 will be available in all market areas.
OPT-60 will be available in all market areas.

Market Area delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

Operating Area 1
     Market Area 33       No Restrictions
     Market Area 34       No Restrictions

Operating Area 2
     Market Area 20       No Restrictions

Operating Area 3
     Market Area 15       No Restrictions
     Market Area 16       No Restrictions
     Market Area 17       No Restrictions
     Market Area 18       No Restrictions
     Market Area 19       No Restrictions

Operating Area 4
     Market Area 21       No Restrictions
     Market Area 22       No Restrictions
     Market Area 23       No Restrictions
     Market Area 24       No Restrictions
     Market Area 25       No Restrictions
     Market Area 29       No Restrictions

Operating Area 5
     Market Area 02       No Restrictions
     Market Area 07       No Restrictions

Operating Area 6
     Market Area 10       No Restrictions
     Market Area 11       No Restrictions
     Market Area 12       No Restrictions
     Market Area 13       No Restrictions
     Market Area 14       No Restrictions

Operating Area 7
     Market Area 01       No Restrictions
     Market Area 03       No Restrictions
     Market Area 04       No Restrictions
     Market Area 05       No Restrictions
     Market Area 06       No Restrictions
     Market Area 08       No Restrictions
     Market Area 09       No Restrictions

Operating Area 8
     Market Area 26       No Restrictions
     Market Area 27       No Restrictions
     Market Area 32       No Restrictions
     Market Area 35       No Restrictions
     Market Area 36       No Restrictions
     Market Area 38       No Restrictions
     Market Area 39       No Restrictions
     Market Area 40       No Restrictions

Operating Area 10
     Market Area 28       No Restrictions
     Market Area 30       No Restrictions
     Market Area 31       No Restrictions

If you have any questions, please contact your Account
Representative.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/19/2001 11:42 AM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	03/19/2001 11:15 AM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <Vicki_Sandler@apses.com>,
<berry@apx.com>, <dcazalet@apx.com>, <billr@calpine.com>,
<jackp@calpine.com>, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>,
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>, <jmpa@dynegy.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <Tamara_Johnson@enron.com>,
<curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, <foothill@lmi.net>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>,
<rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,
<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Draft Decision in Distributed Generation Proceeding

The Commission has issued a draft decision in the distributed generation
proceeding.? It?adopts the Energy Division's program proposals for  load
control and distributed generation initiatives and?authorizes a total  of
$137.8 million in funding for these programs, on an annual basis through
December 31, 2004.

Since the Commission cannot raise electric utility rates until?it  has
determined that the rate freeze is over, it has decided to include the costs
of these programs in the utility's distribution revenue requirement, on the
electric side, and defer consideration of an electric rate increase until
the  rate freeze ends.?
?
The three utilities are directed, within 15 days, to file Advice Letters
increasing their electric distribution revenue requirements, without
modifying  current rates, to include the authorized program budgets.? In the
interim,  all program costs?are to?be tracked in balancing accounts, and the
utilities should establish such accounts for this purpose.? The utilities
are also?directed to implement these programs, "without delay."

Under the adopted programs, SDG&E will administer a  demand-responsiveness
pilot program, targeted to reach 5,000 residential  customers in its service
territory. SCE will administer a similar pilot program,  targeted to 5,000
small commercial customers. SDG&E and SCE will provide  financial incentives
to customers who agree to set their thermostats at  pre-specified levels.?
Through an internet interface, the utility will  monitor and verify actual
interruption of loads at the customer site and provide  interactive
information to customers about their electric usage, in order to  encourage
peak demand reduction.? Within certain parameters, customers will  have the
flexibility to override the thermostat settings, subject to  pre-specified
penalties.

The draft decision would?also authorize a pilot program to provide
interactive consumption and cost information to small customers, such as
historical energy bill information, representative energy usage and cost
information for common appliances, and tariff options. PG&E?is directed
to?contract with an independent web designer to develop a website that
provides customer online access to this information.??The  Commission's?goal
is to reach 10,000 to 15,000 customers in PG&E's  service territory.? The
program will be targeted to residential customers  with relatively high
monthly energy consumption, residential customers with  swimming pools, homes
and small businesses in the San Francisco peninsula or in  Silicon Valley,
and/or rural residences and small businesses.

The draft decision also proposes to implement a self-generation program
across all the utility service territories.? Under the program, financial
incentives will be provided to distributed generation technologies for
amounts  ranging from $1 - $4 per watt and 30-50% of total project cost,
depending on the  type of technology used.? There is a table on page 4 of the
draft decision  which shows the amounts of the incentives.?

The utilities are required to outsource to independent consultants or
contractors all program evaluation activities, and are encouraged to
outsource  as many other aspects of program implementation as possible.? All
installation of technologies (hardware and software) at customer sites will
be  done by independent contractors, and not utility personnel.? The
utilities  are encouraged to coordinate and work closely with local
governments,  community-based organizations and business associations to
recruit and contact  interested customers.
?
Dan
 - 3-15-01 Draft Interim Decision.doc


?
----- Original Message -----
From: Frank  Marsters
To: Marsters, Lindsay ; Marsters, Linda ; Marsters,  Christine ; Marsters
James ; Marcus Palermo  ; Harris, Mary S. ; Gilman, Mike ;  Ferguson, Mike  ;
Day, Pam ; Bass,  Larry ; Balch, Dell ; Adams, George
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 6:48 AM
Subject: James/Jinny Sam Houston 2000

?
 - email.jpg


My impression is that this now being handled in Global Finance.  You might
try Jordan Mintz or Gareth Bahlmann.

	Jon Chapman
	10/23/2000 12:08 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: JEDI II

Mark

Hi !!

Hope you are well and that all goes well in sunny Houston .

I have a query re. JEDI II which Carol St Clair used to deal with legally ,
apparently . Mark Evans tells me she was in your group before maternity leave
. Do you have any idea who now deals with JEDI issues ?

Many thanks and very best wishes.

Jon


Drew, Jeff
I've been out of pocket a couple of days... sorry I didn't get back sooner.
Yes, TW did know about this meeting.  We got a call from Lad at the beginning
of the week letting us know it was coming and asking us would we
participate.  In fact, we've tentatively arranged a follow-on meeting on
Friday with SoCal to discuss TW-only issues.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Fossum, Drew
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: Fawcett, Jeffery; Scott, Susan
Subject: Re: FW: SoCalGas Capacity Forum

Thanks.  My guess is that someone ought to go and represent TW.  Fawcett and
Harris ought to make that call.  Jeff D:  I assume you know who Lad Lorenz
is.  Either Jeff:  does Lad's involvement signal anything to us--i.e., is he
their "get stuff done guy" or their "try to look like you are getting stuff
done guy" ?  DF

From: Jeff Dasovich on 02/27/2001 07:51 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Jeffery Fawcett/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FW: SoCalGas Capacity Forum

You get this?  Someone that I know forwarded it along to me.  Know anything
about it?

Best,
Jeff

 - Capacity Forum.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 03/14/2000
11:41 AM ---------------------------

royal_b_edmondson@reliantenergy.com on 03/14/2000 10:57:07 AM
To: ami_Chokshi@enron.com, ggrant@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Kn changes upstream on the 60 K to 92155 for the 5,000 and we bring
in 3,000 for champians also Kn 92155 on the 201 ....no other changes

(See attached file: egmnom-Mar.xls)

 - egmnom-Mar.xls


This email confirms that you sent an auction payment for $66.85 to
msipe@conninc.com for Re: ITEM # 1013506357 HENDERSON ROOKIE.

View the details of this transaction online at:
https://www.paypal.com/vst/id=7LR97472GK194071D

------------------------------
Auction Information
------------------------------

Auction Site: eBay
Item URL:     http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1013506357&ed=1002335275
Auction Title:   Re: ITEM # 1013506357 HENDERSON ROOKIE
Item Number:  1013506357
Close Date:   October 18, 2001

------------------------------
Jason Wolfe's CONFIRMED Address
------------------------------

Jason Wolfe
2300 W. Alabama
Apt. 6
Houston, TX 77098
USA

Thank you for using PayPal!

The PayPal Team

Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address
cannot be answered. For assistance, login to your PayPal
account and choose the "Help" link in the footer of any page.


Please let me know if you have any additions/revisions.

Thanks!

Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/18/2001 06:42 PM -----

	JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>
	07/18/2001 05:31 PM

		 To: "Harry Kingerski (E-mail)" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "Jeff Dasovich
(E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Jim Steffes (E-mail)"
<James_D_Steffes@enron.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)" <smara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: ACR Inviting Comment On DWR/CPUC Proposed Rate Agreement

Attached is an ACR issued today requesting comment on the Rate Agreement
reached by the CPUC and DWR (which I will send under separate cover).  The
ACR highlights certain aspects of the Agreement and asks for parties to
evaluate the effects of the Agreement and indicate what they believe the
consequences of its adoption would be.  Comments are due by August 1st.

The Agreement itself basically calls for DWR to set its revenue requirement
based on "Bond Related Costs" and "Operating Expenses" and for the
Commission to implement such revenue requirement.  It is up to DWR to
determine whether the revenue requirement is just and reasonable prior to
submitting it to the Commission.

Please let me know if Enron is interested in Commenting on the Agreement.

Jeanne Bennett

-----Original Message-----
From: Wong, John S. [mailto:jsw@cpuc.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 10:11 AM
Subject: ACR Inviting Comment On DWR/CPUC Proposed Rate Agreement

Attached is an assigned Commissioner ruling (ACR) inviting comment on the
proposed rate agreement between the California Dept. of Water Resources and
the California Public Utilities Commission.  Interested parties may file
comments with the Docket Office on or before August 1, 2001.

Please note that there are three attachments to the ACR. Attachment A, the
proposed rate agreement, is being forwarded to you as a separate PDF
document.  Attachment B, the relevant Water Code sections, is contained in
the body of the attached Word document.  Attachment C is the two page letter
from the DWR, the Dept. of Finance, and the Treasurer's Office to President
Lynch dated July 2, 2001.  Attachment C was previously distributed to the
A.00-11-038 et al service list in the Chief ALJ's ruling dated July 5, 2001.
Today's ACR and all three of the attachments can also be accessed at the
CPUC's web site.

<<A0011038 Lynch Ruling.doc>>

John S. Wong
CPUC - ALJ
(415) 703-3130

 - A0011038  Lynch Ruling.doc


-----Original Message-----
From: Stein, Neil [mailto:neil.stein@csfb.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 7:52 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Subject: CSFB Independent Power Weekly--Issue #44

 <<IPW092401.pdf>>
Good Morning,

Attached, please find the latest issue of our Independent Power Weekly.

Also note that there is a replay available of our conference call, which
took place last week.  The dial-in number is 402/220-7493.  The PIN # is
7493.  The call featured Judah Rose from ICF Consulting.  Topics discussed
included: 1. Recent trends in the US power market; 2. Their impact on the
generation supply chain; and, 3. The relationship between GDP and power
demand.  A copy of the slides that accompanied Judah's presentation is
available upon request.

Summary:
1. IPP's Fall 5.1%   Last week our our IPP composite declined 15.4%,
outperforming the NASDAQ (-15.7%), but underperforming the S&P 500 (-11.1%).
NRG Energy, which was down 8.8%, was the strongest generator in the group.
International Power was the weakest performer, declining 30.5%.

2. Generation Oriented Utilities Fall 6.9%   Our universe of generation
oriented utilities fell 6.9%, outperforming all the major market indices.
DTE Energy, which was down 2.7%, was the strongest performer in the group.
PPL was the weakest performer, declining 13.5%.

3. IPPs Trading 24% Below Private Market Asset Value   Importantly, our
analysis indicates that all the major US IPPs are now trading at or below
the private market values of their assets.  As a group, the major IPPs are
trading at a 24% average discount to their private market asset values.  NRG
Energy and Reliant Resources are trading at the most significant discounts
to their private market values-33% and 34%.

4. Disparity Between Public and Private Market Valuations is Unsustainable
We believe this situation is unsustainable and envision 3 scenarios that
could play out.  1. Stock prices may simply rebound correcting the valuation
disparity; 2. IPPs limit the amount of capital allocated to new plant
construction and pursue share buybacks or acquisitions of other IPPs; or, 3.
Traditional utilities (both domestic and foreign) or other entities from
outside the industry pursue acquisitions of IPPs.

Regards,

Neil Stein   212/325-4217

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.


Can set up a conference call with me and Remi Cologne in Brazil this week.
Also, what happen to Manu.


I talked with Barb Bishoff who is setting up the Measurement
	meeting for Mary Kay and Dave Neubauer.  She said it will
	probably be next week since she is having trouble getting both
	Mary Kay and Dave at the same time.

	I told her it was critical that Shelley be in the meeting.

	I told her Steve, Rick and I are optional for this discussion.

	Thanks. Lynn


The eData LOg on screen is not appearing after clicking on the eData icon.  It seems to lock up???

Any ideas.

Paul Thomas
Enron Corp
713-853-0403


We have received an executed financial master agreement:

Type of Agreement:		ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:			September 27, 2001

Enron Entity:			Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:			Public Utility District No. 1 of Benton County

Transactions Covered:		The agreement is limited to natural gas, electricity or other energy used for the production of electricity.

Confirming Entity:		Enron North America Corp.

Governing Law:     			New York

Special Handling Requirements:   No special handling requirements

Copies will be distributed

Samantha M. Boyd
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3803
Houston, Texas 77002
Ph:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490


[IMAGE]IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin
[IMAGE]For Natural Gas Delivered on Friday, December  28, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Thursday, December  27, 2001)
Click here to access index history


Fax me the contract so that I can share this info with the trader.
713-646-2496.  Thanks.
PL


Please see the attached memo regarding comments to issues concerning a Master
Gas Agreement.  We trust this will assist in understanding certain sections
in the agreement.  Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any
additional questions and or comments regarding this matter.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Some additional background on the California refund issue.  Consistent with what we discussed; just some additional detail.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alvarez, Ray
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:27 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Robertson, Linda; McVicker, Maureen
Subject:	CA Refund Case Information; PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL

Steve,

Jim Steffes called me to inquire as to the information you are interested in, regarding the California refund case, and I passed the following along to him by phone:

Status of the refund claim:

The CAISO refund claims made in CAISO letters to Congress, and the final claim at the FERC-ordered settlement conference, were approximately $38 MM.  The initial claim in the California Refund case before Judge Birchman was very similar, although the most recent CAISO claim is that they owe us $1MM!  A review of their claim revealed errors.  I asked Charles River Associates to re-run the numbers correcting only the errors and they came up with a $57MM figure.  Please note that this number resulted from an internal exercise and is not a claim by the ISO.  However, I consider this the maximum exposure from what is known at this time.  I expect that CAISO will revise its claim against us around December 7, and I will communicate the new claim as soon as I receive it.

Points summarizing the proceeding:

The California refund proceeding at FERC, unlike the Pacific Northwest proceeding, contemplates that refunds will be paid and orders the Judge to determine the amount of the refunds.
Issues to be decided by the Judge include (1) the amounts of the mitigated market claiming price (2) the amounts owed by each seller and (3) the amount that a seller may offset against its refund obligation.
This proceeding has been delayed due to errors and omissions in the California ISO's data.
Due to deficiencies in the data, it is also difficult to assess potential exposure. The California ISO's claims have thus far been erroneous.
Hearings are scheduled to occur on December 17-21 and February 11-15. The Judge's ruling is expected on March 8, 2002.

Timing of the FERC Order:
It is difficult to say how quickly the Commission may rule after receiving the Judge's certification of findings and record on March 8.  Arguably, they could act very quickly due to the limited scope of the proceeding and the fact that the Judge's findings will likely be limited to the three issues described above.

Let me know if you need any more information.  I will copy you on significant memos in the case.  Regards,  Ray


Physical only is great!  We now await word from Tom.
Thanks!

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 09/26/2000 02:37 PM
To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: ClickPaper-Woodlands Forest Product

Per our conversation, the above counterparty is approved by Legal to trade
online physical pulp & paper only.  We cannot trade financial until Credit
receives financial statements and can determine whether they are an eligible
swap participant or not.


Currently, we are unable to use IT to serve Ogy at Doyle on Transco.  I have
devised a super scientific method for pricing VNG space for Ogy.  Poke all
the holes in it you want.

Use the following formulas to determine the price to Ogy

The higher of
St 65 Offer plus $.35
TCO Offer plus $.14

Good Luck


Hi saritha sundaresan,

Thanks for joining Evite!

With your new Evite Membership, you can:

* Send Invites for your next get-together, track RSVPS, get maps and
directions, and more:
http://www.evite.com/compose?li=reg

* Set Evite Reminders to help you remember birthdays, meetings and other
important dates:
http://www.evite.com/reminders?li=reg

Caution: May Be Habit-Forming - All the Invites you send or receive are
stored on your 'My Evite' page. It's fun to keep checking your Invite as
guests RSVP and leave comments - once you try it, you'll never go back to
email or phone tag when you want to get people together!
http://www.evite.com/welcome?li=rba

Remember, all these services are 100% free to you as an Evite Member. To
access them anytime, simply go to:
http://www.evite.com/?li=reg

and log in with:

email: eveningmba@haas.berkeley.edu

Thanks!,
The Evite Team

-----------------------------------------------
Use Evite to host your next get-together. It's easy, fun and 100% free.
Click here: http://www.evite.com/csplash?li=cek

HAVING TROUBLE? See below.

Having Trouble?
If nothing happens when you click the link above, use your mouse to cut
and paste the entire address into your Web browser, then hit return.
Make sure you copy it exactly as it appears above.
Still having trouble? Email support@evite.com


Rob:  Have you ever directly engaged counsel in New Guinea?  I have searched
our jurisdictional database but to no avail.  I only find Australian firms
with New Guinea associations.  Thanks.  Sara


Please join me in congratulating Paul Quilkey in his new role as Vice
President leading our efforts in Australia.  Joe Hirl has assumed a leading
role in the formation of our business in Japan.  Joe also has regional
responsibility for trading activity.

Paul's appointment is in recognition of the critical role Paul has played in
Enron Australia's successful commencement and the body of outstanding work he
has accumulated to date in his career with Enron. It is worth noting that
Paul joined Enron as recently as the Associate intake of 1995.  In the short
time since then Paul has developed and grown through various positions to his
current Trading and Origination role, a position of great responsibility in a
dynamic young business making aggressive inroads into the Australian market,
and far from Enron's traditional US markets.

Please join me in congratulating Paul on his appointment.

Rebecca


Hey buddy.  I still work at Enron in downtown Houston.  Send me an
email at Chris.Germany@enron.com.   AND congrats on that wife thing.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davenport, Tim (TT)
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 1:45 PM
> To: Germany, Barbra (BE)
> Subject: RE: Hi
>
> Chris,
>
> It is good to hear from you.  Where are you working now?  Do you have an
> e-mail address at work or home?  How about a phone number?  You have been
> very difficult to keep up with.  How's your family?  Any plans to some
> down to this area?  If so, give me a call and maybe we can get together.
>
> I still just have one wife (same old one) but we are up to three kids.
> Two girls and a boy.
>
> Keep in touch,
> Tim D.
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Germany, Barbra (BE)
>  Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 1:37 PM
>  To: Davenport, Tim (TT)
>  Cc: 'chris.germany@enron.com'
>  Subject: Hi
>
>  Hi Tim.  It's Chris Germany.  My sister-in-law brought her laptop
> with her to East Texas.  She said I could send you an email.  How come you
> never call anymore??
>
>  Just kidding.  Take care of yourself.  Maybe we can get together
> sometime.  By the way, how many children do you have (3 or 4)?  How many
> wives?
>
>  Later
>  cg


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/16/99 03:37
PM ---------------------------

Tanya Rohauer
12/16/99 02:28 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SITA

Michael has asked that we change the ISDA to be in the name of SITA France
with SITA as the credit support provider.  Can we make the appropriate
changes to the document.? I have changed a few things on the worksheet.
Thanks!


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/01/2001 04:57
PM ---------------------------

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 05/01/2001 04:30:06 PM
To: "'PARKER, Isabel'" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com>, "Shoemaker, Kent
(GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com>
cc: "Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)" <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>, "Smink, Jaap
(PS, GE AEP)" <jaap.smink@ps.ge.com>, "Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)"
<lee.johnson@ps.ge.com>, "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>

Subject: Urgent:  GE Final Documents

Isabel and Greg:

Attached is an escrow instruction letter authorizing you to hold the
documents referenced in the memorandum in trust until the closing
transaction.

Jaap, you are authorized to fax the documents that you have to Isabel at 212
277 4001 and to Greg at 203-359-3031.  As the funding is contingent on them
seeing our fax documents first, we will have to send them now (or no later
than 9 CST) or the funding doesn't occur.

Call me if you have any questions.

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: PARKER, Isabel [mailto:isabel.parker@freshfields.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 5:18 PM
To: 'Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)'
Cc: Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)
Subject: RE: GE guaranty, opinion of counsel and letter of credit

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

This seems fine.  You might want to add the GE acknowledgement of receipt of
funds, which, as we are holding documents in escrow until monies are
received by GE, can also now be signed in advance.
As to the opinion, we would prefer it to be executed by Dan Rowley or
yourself, rather than by you per personam Dan Rowley.
Let me know if this is possible
Thanks
Isabel

-----Original Message-----
From: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE) [mailto:kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 5:14 PM
To: 'PARKER, Isabel'
Cc: Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)
Subject: RE: GE guaranty, opinion of counsel and letter of credit

Will this work?  Is this correct list of documents

-----Original Message-----
From: PARKER, Isabel [mailto:isabel.parker@freshfields.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 5:06 PM
To: 'Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)'
Cc: Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)
Subject: RE: GE guaranty, opinion of counsel and letter of credit

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

Can we not fax the document to Dan Rowley and ask him to fax it back to us?
That way he doesn't need to print it out.  Alternatively, do you have
authority to issue the opinion yourself?
Isabel

-----Original Message-----
From: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE) [mailto:kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 5:04 PM
To: 'PARKER, Isabel'
Subject: RE: GE guaranty, opinion of counsel and letter of credit

I trust both of you as attorneys to hold in escrow.  This is an
administrative problem.  Dan Rowley cannot get to a printer in time.  Can I
sign Dan Rowley name by Kent shoemaker and fax it out to you.

-----Original Message-----
From: PARKER, Isabel [mailto:isabel.parker@freshfields.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 4:56 PM
To: 'Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)'
Cc: Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)
Subject: RE: GE guaranty, opinion of counsel and letter of credit

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

That is fine but if you can also fax the documents to me at the same time at
212 277 4001, that would be good.
I agree with the Escrow Letter in principle - who would you want to sign
such a letter? Presumably Salmon, as beneficiary of the guarantee?
Thanks
Isabel

-----Original Message-----
From: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE) [mailto:kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 4:53 PM
To: 'PARKER, Isabel'
Subject: RE: GE guaranty, opinion of counsel and letter of credit

Greg Lang at Paul Hastings has requested that the fax documents be sent to
him.  Is that okay?  I need to create an Escrow Letter that says the
documents cannot be released until funding.  I don't want a guaranty out
there without a closing.

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: PARKER, Isabel [mailto:isabel.parker@freshfields.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 4:03 PM
To: 'Kay.Mann@enron.com'; gregorylang@paulhastings.com
Cc: ccampbell@kslaw.com; kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com; VAN DUSEN, Nicholas
Subject: RE: GE guaranty, opinion of counsel and letter of credit

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

Our credit documentation provides that Pegasus shall not cause any monies to
be released from the Turbine Escrow Account until all relevant documentation
has been executed and delivered, namely:

(i) GE consent
(ii) GE opinion
(iii) Turbine Contract
(iv) Security Agreement
(v) Promissory Note
(vi) Amended Salmon LLC Agreement
(vii) GE Parent Guarantee.

The lenders consequently expect to see an executed (faxed if necessary) copy
of all of the above (including the GE Parent Guarantee) prior to release of
funds from the Escrow Account.

Thank you
Isabel

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 3:55 PM
To: gregorylang@paulhastings.com; isabel.parker@freshfields.com
Cc: ccampbell@kslaw.com; kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
Subject: GE guaranty, opinion of counsel and letter of credit

In conversations with GE, it is their understanding that their guaranty
will not be transmitted until there is a fed ref number tomorrow.  The
opinion letter will be faxed as soon as the GC is available, or Kent can
sign for Dan Rowley if that is acceptable.  DRowley can sign originals on
Thursday.

The LOC is in the works, and GE understands that 10% will be retained in
escrow until the LOC is delivered.

There will be three original opinions.  There is one original guaranty, and
I'm not certain of GE's willingness to give more than that.  Obviously,
there will be only one LOC.

Kay


Don,
I got a call from another Hourly Trading floor that uses Enron online and is
looking to do some hourly deals at Cinergy.
He said he has not seen anything for over a month.  Do you think you guys
will put the TNE numbers back up, or if they are where should he be looking.

How was Vegas?

Regards,
Jeff
713-647-8802


Hi, Edmund!  Please identify the ENTIRE Morgan name, please.  We are
negotiating with several of their entities.  Which type of trading?  Thanks.
Sara

	Edmund Cooper
	07/19/2000 10:15 AM

		 To: Markus Fiala/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT,
Paul Chivers/LON/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, James.Clarry@AllenOvery.com @ ENRON
		 Subject: Morgan Stanley - EnronCredit.com ISDA

I've spoken with Morgan Stanley this afternoon to get details on progress
with the ISDA for credit trading.

In brief, they have our ISDA documents and are in the process of reviewing
them.  They also informed me that Enron North America was in the process of
negotiating ISDA documents with the same MS entity.  They are going to
provide consolidated comments to myself and Sara Shackleton in Houston during
the course of tomorrow.

I'll liaise with Sara to ensure that this gets pushed along at top speed from
the Enron end.

Thanks, Edmund


Dale,

Please let me know the status of the creation of Gas Daily index swaps. I
believe that you have been talking to Mike Grigsby on this issue.

I created the April Gas Daily swap this morning please approve this product
also.

Thanks,

Pete


More bad press.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com <mailto:tbradley@bracepatt.com>>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Tracey+20Bradley+22+20+3Ctbradley+40bracepatt+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] <mailto:[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Tracey+20Bradley+22+20+3Ctbradley+40bracepatt+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]>
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:41 PM
To:	jlimone@aeglobalmarkets.com <mailto:jlimone@aeglobalmarkets.com>; Charles Shoneman; Kimberly Curry; Randall Rich; susan.ginsberg@elpaso.com <mailto:susan.ginsberg@elpaso.com>; Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Cc:	Paul Fox
Subject:	California Newspaper Articles re: El Paso Hearing

None of the news reports I've seen are favorable to El Paso.

LA Times
August 7, 2001

THE NATION
El Paso Rests Its Case in Gas Hearing
 Energy: Firm accused of price gouging ends arguments, though judge warned there's evidence it manipulated market.

By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR, TIMES STAFF WRITER

WASHINGTON -- A Texas natural gas conglomerate accused of price gouging in California unexpectedly rested its case Monday, even though a judge warned that the state has presented credible evidence the company attempted to take unfair advantage of the energy crisis.

Judge Curtis L. Wagner Jr. of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission said he had wanted El Paso Corp. to present witnesses to explain tape-recorded phone calls that he says raised suspicions of an inside deal to manipulate California's natural gas market.

The California Public Utilities Commission is alleging that El Paso created artificial natural gas shortages last year, helping drive electricity prices to record levels. The state wants FERC to order refunds of at least $184 million. But the company said its critics had not presented any new evidence and had failed to prove their allegations. FERC's governing board had initially dismissed complaints of insider dealing, but it recently authorized Wagner to take a closer look.

"If anything happens here, I am sure it is going to be all political," said El Paso spokeswoman Norma Dunn. "There is absolutely no new evidence. FERC already looked at this the first time and found that El Paso did not violate any rules. How can they come back and say we did?"

Kevin Lipson, a lawyer for plaintiff Southern California Edison, called El Paso's decision "one of the dumber moves I've ever seen": valid from a legal standpoint but "a public relations disaster. . . . The judge is saying we're going to have to draw our own conclusions if they don't present witnesses."

The case is considered the closest thing to a full-blown trial of allegations that corporate scheming--not merely an imbalance of supply and demand--contributed to California's energy woes.

At issue is a controversial contract between two subsidiaries of the Houston-based company: El Paso Natural Gas Co., a pipeline regulated by FERC; and El Paso Merchant Energy, an energy marketing company.

The marketing company last year acquired the right to ship 1.2 billion cubic feet of natural gas a day through a critical pipeline serving Southern California. CPUC alleges that Merchant used inside information to win the deal and later withheld supplies of gas to drive up prices. Once the contract expired May 31 and some 30 other companies acquired the shipping rights, natural gas prices plunged.

Wagner, FERC's chief administrative law judge, has until early October to render an initial decision to the agency's governing board. FERC has the power to order the return of any ill-gotten profits, but the company would likely appeal such a penalty to the federal courts.

A few weeks ago, Wagner dismissed Gov. Gray Davis' demand for $8.9 billion in electricity refunds from out-of-state suppliers. In the El Paso case, however, he has been a thorn in the side of industry.

El Paso chief executive William Wise had been expected to take the stand Monday afternoon, when the company abruptly shifted its strategy in a dramatic legal gambit.

Dan Collins, an El Paso attorney, told the judge that the company would rest its case. Collins held out the possibility that Wise might yet testify, but only to answer questions from the judge, not from plaintiff's lawyers.

After a short recess, Wagner returned to the hearing room and ruled that CPUC had met its initial burden of proof--akin to finding probable cause in a criminal trial.

"I do find that the complainant has made a prima facie case and the burden of proof now shifts to El Paso," Wagner said. When El Paso's lawyers tried to respond, Wagner ordered them to "please be seated."

Wagner said he was disturbed by transcripts of conversations taped in February 2000 between Robin Cox, an official of El Paso Merchant, and Harvey Rodman, an official of yet another El Paso subsidiary, Mojave Pipeline Co.

Cox was seeking a shipping discount from Mojave a few days before Merchant finalized its bid. The Mojave pipeline would provide an alternative route into Southern California in case of shipping bottlenecks.

Securing the Mojave discount made the El Paso contract more valuable for Merchant, the plaintiffs allege. In one taped conversation, Cox asks Rodman to refrain from publicly posting the discount for a few days. Plaintiffs allege that other shippers might have competed with Merchant for El Paso's capacity had they known a discount was available on Mojave.

But Merchant official Mark Mitchell testified that the Mojave discount was of no real importance in the company's decision to enter into the deal.

The judge wanted to know more. He urged El Paso Corp. to produce Cox and Rodman as witnesses.

"If ever a deal was being made . . . the words are clear," said Wagner. "It's all buddy-buddy stuff."

The judge said he was concerned that the Cox-Rodman conversations violated FERC rules that require pipelines to maintain arm's-length relationships with marketing affiliates.

CPUC attorney Harvey Morris, who has spearheaded the case against El Paso, said the judge's ruling made it clear that Merchant obtained preferential treatment.

Morris said he was baffled that El Paso chose not to bring on more witnesses, despite the judge's warning.

"If I were in their shoes," said Morris, "unless I had something to hide, I'd call my witnesses and give them another chance to defend themselves."

Responded William Scherman, a lawyer for Merchant: "You make a judgment that you have produced evidence that is sufficient to win your case, and we believe we have done that."

*

Times staff writer Nancy Vogel in Sacramento contributed to this story.

Copyright 2001 Los Angeles Times

************************************
Price gouging case strong, judge says
El Paso Corp. executives decline to testify -- hearing cut short

Bernadette Tansey, Chronicle Staff Writer
Tuesday, August 7, 2001
?2001 San Francisco Chronicle

URL: <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/08/07/MN173922.DTL>

A federal regulatory judge buoyed California's hopes for a major refund on energy costs yesterday when he said the state had presented credible evidence that a giant Texas natural gas company broke the rules against favoring an affiliate.

Curtis L. Wagner, the chief administrative law judge for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, said lawyers for the state had made a convincing case that the El Paso Corp. acted improperly. He urged El Paso executives to rebut the allegations.

But they declined, bringing an unexpectedly sudden end to the evidentiary hearing in Washington, D.C., and boosting the spirits of California officials who have asked the regulatory commission to order El Paso Corp. to refund up to $200 million.

Wagner plans to file a recommended decision to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission by Oct. 9.

At issue is an allegation by the state Public Utilities Commission that El Paso rigged the bidding for use of its natural gas pipeline in Southern California last year. The PUC said El Paso steered a huge block of crucial pipeline space to its own marketing affiliate, effectively freezing out competitors.

The PUC, utilities, say that El Paso's pipeline division and its marketing arm then cooperated to choke off the flow of gas to the state, setting off increases in the price of natural gas -- as well as in the price of electricity from gas-fired power plants.

Wagner said internal El Paso memos and transcripts support the first part of the state's allegations: that El Paso violated federal regulations that prohibit coordination between regulated natural gas pipelines and their unregulated affiliates, which are required to operate independently.

"The California Public Utilities Commission had shown a prima facie case, and the burden of proof shifted to the other side," Wagner told The Chronicle yesterday. "Now I have to look at the whole record and decide the case."

El Paso denies the allegations that it improperly shared information about the bidding process with the marketing affiliate and arranged discounts.

Top executives, including El Paso Corp. chief executive officer William Wise, had flown to Washington to testify at Wagner's suggestion.

"I told them what I thought they needed to do to show there was no affiliate abuse or no (market manipulation)," Wagner said. But he said the company had the right to cut the hearing short and rely on the evidence already presented. "That's up to them."

Whatever penalties the commission might impose, they could be dwarfed by damages sought in a series of private ratepayer lawsuits against El Paso. Those suits claim the company is largely responsible for billions of dollars in skyrocketing energy costs suffered by Californians over the past 18 months..

AMOUNTS TO CONCESSION
The decision to keep executives off the witness stand yesterday amounted to a concession that El Paso violated Federal Energy Regulatory Commission regulations against affiliate abuse, asserted PUC attorney Harvey Morris.

"I infer from their actions it was not going to get any better (if executives testified)," Morris said. "They were doing damage control."

El Paso spokeswoman Norma Dunn denied that the company has conceded wrongdoing.

"That's absolutely insane," said Dunn.

Wagner said transcripts of a telephone conversation between an employee of El Paso's marketing arm, El Paso Merchant Energy, and one of its pipeline affiliates "tend to show there was communication between the marketing agency and the pipeline." The two were discussing discounts.

"It looked like hanky-panky," Wagner said. The judge said he was also influenced that a memo outlining El Paso Merchant Energy's strategy for boosting profits from its pipeline contract was shared with the top executive for the company's pipeline division.

E-mail Bernadette Tansey at btansey@sfchronicle.com <mailto:btansey@sfchronicle.com>.

?2001 San Francisco Chronicle   Page A - 1


I am open for luch Wednesday and Thursday.  Let me know which fits your
calendar the best.  DK did tell me about the Mark Marin tournament.  If your
Mom saved the paper let me have it for reference.  Did you see the Sunday
paper RE: the 100 highest paid executives in Houston?

Dad

Queen28cmh@aol.com on 05/29/2001 10:41:30 AM
To: <shorton@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: morning 5/29

Good morning Daddy!!!  How are you today?  Did you enjoy your nice long
weekend?  Did Debbie tell you about the golf tournament Mark Martin is
hosting in New Smyrna the week you'll be there that you can play in or at
least watch?  If not, I'll tell you all about it tonight.  Have a great day,
and I'll talk to you tonight.  By the way, let me know if you have any days
free for lunch this week.  I love you!!
Love,
Caron


Thank you.  Is there a sitara report that we can run to show the transport in
the system through March 2001.

Thank you,
Mike


approved
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/29/2000 11:25 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	08/28/2000 01:54 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: request for monitor

Mark:  I would like to request a flat panel monitor to replace my current
monitor.  Thank you.  Sara


Gentlemen,

I'm attaching what we are calling an override letter to accompany the
breakout contracts.  This letter is intended to preserve the lender
requirements/accounting treatment from the WestLB agreement so long as the
equipment is a part of the financing package.

I believe we also want to address an issue regarding assignment, but we are
still discussing Mike's version internally.

Kent, I look forward to talking to you tomorrow at 300 CST.  If you would
like to discuss any of this in the am, please give me a call.

Thanks,

Kay


the attached was submitted today.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Comment Letter for Energy Group.doc


Access to ERMS and TAGG has been granted.  I will email Robert his id and password.

Thanks!
Leah

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:06 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.; UBSW Energy Information Risk Management
Cc:	Badeer, Robert
Subject:	RE: Access to TAGG

Mike Grigsby will work.  Sorry.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:04 PM
To:	UBSW Energy Information Risk Management
Cc:	Grigsby, Mike; Badeer, Robert
Subject:	RE: Access to TAGG

please set him up like Mike Grigsby
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	UBSW Energy Information Risk Management
Sent:	Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:01 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Cc:	Grigsby, Mike; Badeer, Robert
Subject:	RE: Access to TAGG

Please let me know who Robert needs to be setup like for ERMS.

Thanks!
Leah

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:54 PM
To:	UBSW Energy Information Risk Management
Cc:	Grigsby, Mike; Badeer, Robert
Subject:	Access to TAGG

Can you please grant access to Robert Badeer for TAGG/ERMS.  We need to get him access to TDS and this requires a TAGG login.  Bob will be trading on the NW desk under Mike Grigsby effective Monday March 11th.  Can you please process this request by tomorrow.  Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.
PL


Here is the template for the Contract Briefs, if you want to update electronically.


Hi Everyone,

The newest version of Option Exercise has now been released to prod (It was
released this morning).  Please let us know if you find  any new problems
when you start using the application.

Thanks, Nadine (713)853-9863.


Hi Sherri,

Well, your ears must have been burning.  I have been thinking about you this week.  Gee, a lot has happened since we last spoke.  I'm still here.  We are very busy on Transwestern.  I would love to catch up with you, are you available by phone sometime next week?  My calendar looks pretty open next Tues, Wed or Fri.

I look forward to visiting with you soon.

Kim

P.S.  Martha is still here, also.  She is with the Northern Natural side, I'm with Transwestern.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sherri Kimes [mailto:sek6@cornell.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:10 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: Hi

Hi Kim,

Just checking to see how you're doing.

Sherri Kimes


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Michelle Y. Lokay
Status last changed by: Michelle Y. Lokay
Expense Report Name: Expenses 02/27/02
Report Total: $767.89
Amount Due Employee: $767.89

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


does that mean just me?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Abdmoulaie, Mansoor
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 4:00 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: CAS System

Kim
Please let's keep it small for right now.
Mansoor

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 3:55 PM
To:	Abdmoulaie, Mansoor
Subject:	RE: CAS System

Mansoor,

I've got it booked.  Who else from our shop would you like to see attend also?

Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Abdmoulaie, Mansoor
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 3:47 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Lokay, Michelle
Cc:	Frazier, Perry; Matthews, Ron; Asante, Ben; 'don.'
Subject:	RE: CAS System
Importance:	High

It seems like Tuesday Jan-29,  9-10:30 am ( in my office) looks good for Kim and I hope for the rest of us so please let's attend the meeting.
Mansoor

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Abdmoulaie, Mansoor
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 3:11 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Lokay, Michelle
Cc:	Frazier, Perry; Matthews, Ron; Asante, Ben; 'don.'
Subject:	CAS System

We in TW- Planning would like to schedule a meeting with you to discuss !): the current CAS operations 2): ways to improve the efficiency/ speed of  the system.

Please select one of the following schedules:

Tuesday	Jan-29:	9-10:30 am
or
Wednesday:	Jan-30:	1:30 pm to 3 pm

Regards,
Mansoor
Location: my office


I think he looked at the preso and maybe 25% of the b-plan.  We did not talk about it, yet.  He said it looked good, but he got bored so he stopped reading.  He may be waiting for you to come back in town to discuss.  I told him you would be back Monday.  That is the latest.

-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Trevor
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 3:06 PM
To: Taylor, Michael E
Subject: RE:

You two go over the bplan?
 Trevor Woods

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Michael E <Michael.E.Taylor@ENRON.com>
To: Woods, Trevor <Trevor.Woods@ENRON.com>
Sent: Mon Nov 19 14:59:29 2001
Subject: RE:

done

	 -----Original Message-----
	From: 	Woods, Trevor
	Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 3:19 PM
	To:	Taylor, Michael E
	Subject:

	we're gonna need a table of contents on the b plan in addition to the printed version


Hey Lisa,

Hope you had an absolutely incredible honeymoon.  I'm sure it was a blast.  The reason I'm writing, actually, is because I left something at the church the night of the wedding.  I thought it had been taken to the country club but the wedding co-ordinators didn't have it.  Basically, it was a white plastic bag with a little kids t-shirt and a little girls shorts & tank top outfit (along with a little hand painted picture).  I bought the clothes in the Caymans for my niece and nephew, so ideally I like to track them down.  I was hoping you could tell me who I should contact about items left in the bridesmaid's room in the church.  I think the bag said The Wharf on the outside if that helps at all.

Thanks,
Sue


This is the Official Snowking Report for the Year
2002!

How bout Keystone/Vail/Breckenridge/"Beaver" Creek all
in one trip for the Amazing Price of $590.00. Yes,
that is correct - No Bullshit.

Listen Up-
This includes round trip tickets from N.O. to Denver.
5 Days/4 Nights in a Condo in Keystone (Either 2 BR/2
Bath or 3 BR/2 Bath w/ a fold out. Includes minivan,
since Keystone is approximately 91 miles from the
Denver Airport. Lift tickets for 4 Days at the
locations mentioned above (Sorry, only 2 days out of 4
can be at Vail or Beaver Creek.)

Dates: Jan. 10 - 14th (Thurs.-Mon.)

If you act now, they will also provide free snowjobs.
They also said if you ride a Harley Sportster all the
way from B.R.,they will just give the trip away. I
asked about pets -Dogs have to sleep outside, Sorry.

They have plenty of ski runs. One double black diamond
goes through the nig part of town, I suggest going w/
cjrob through this treacherous run and don't slow down
on the flat areas. Another goes straight to Oz - we
all know who will be hitting this green run in his
Pink bib and jacket. They also have a married couple
run, no further comments on this one. 00. I'll be on
the bunny slopes checking out the MILF'S and the
beginners. I hope to give a few lessons.

Anyway, who has questions or comments?

CE
Don't forget your swim trunks!

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Novosel, Sarah
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 2:37 PM
To:	Shelk, John; Steffes, James D.; Yeung, Charles; Robertson, Linda
Cc:	'dsalvosa@epsa.org'; 'aspring@epsa.org'
Subject:	RE: DOE on Reliability

Thanks John.  You need to forward this message to Jim and Rick also

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shelk, John
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 12:58 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Yeung, Charles; Novosel, Sarah; Robertson, Linda
Cc:	'dsalvosa@epsa.org'; 'aspring@epsa.org'
Subject:	DOE on Reliability

According to Platt's Electric Power Daily (Fri. Aug. 24), the Administration is "leaning toward" putting the reliability function with FERC and the RTOs, NOT the NERC approach we oppose.  We will check on this independently.  We have certainly encouraged them in the direction they are now leaning toward.


I'll be there.


I changed Heat rates for Caledonia and Gleason, and Start Charge for Gleason.
Heat rates has no impact on numbers. Only increased start charge reduced IRR
from 13.966% to 13.947% with same debt and equity scenario. I think we can
stay with previous numbers (debt and equity) with new heat rates and start
charge. Jin


Hi, Sal.  Just saying hello.  Hope your interviews at OU went well.   You
are quite the interviewing queen!  Maybe you should write a book (or
article) sometime on "Keys to Snagging the Right Employee!".

Good news about Dad, huh?   So glad you were able to get him to see your
doctor to start the ball rolling on finding new answers for him.   It is a
lot of work to find the right answers for our healthcare!

We are starting to think more about the baby's room . . .  I think we're
leaning towards using your bed, if that's still okay.   Did you say that the
changing table would be available, too?  Is it light wood also?
I think we will probably get our own bed linens - but what do your look
like?   Boyish?   Do you think it's better to use a rocker or a glider?

Sorry we didn't make it for a fall trip.   It seems that almost every
weekend one of us has been gone - Chris leaves for Asia on Thursday for 2
weeks - it's a nonstop whirlwind of travel!

Thanksgiving should be fun . . . what shall we bring?     Is there any sort
of a plan for Friday?

I had my monthly doctor's appointment today:  the baby is still in there and
her mom is getting very fat!

I have really enjoyed my Halloween nutcracker this season!      Love, Cara

Cara White
Community Development Coordinator
USTA Texas Section
1-888-883-6388
cWhite@texas.usta.com


CALENDAR ENTRY:	EVENT

Description:
	Family Reunion

Date:		7/6/2001
Duration (days):	3

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Thanks - Merry Christmas!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:36 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	Jan 14th off

Stacey, just wanted to give you a heads up that I am taking the 14th off. Folks are in town and this will be our Xmas day. Will be in the rest of the time going forward to ensure that we are getting everything done here.

John


Greg:

In August I submitted an idea to Enron's ThinkBank  "Idea Vault"  for a new business opportunity for Enron. My idea is to develop a new commodity market for exchanging wireless spectrum rights. The idea is categorized under "Commodities" and is accompanied by a report which explains in more detail the idea, background information, market conditions and why it's a tremendous opportunity for Enron.

It's been 2 months since I submitted the idea, but I haven't yet received a response from anyone who may have evaluated it. I'm contacting you now for two reasons. First, it is my understanding that the Net Works group develops and launches ideas like this. And second, it's my effort to "jump start" the review process, for fears that the idea may have fallen between the cracks somewhere in the "Idea Vault" process. Included below is the preface to my report which introduces the idea for trading wireless spectrum. The entire report can be accessed and printed from the Idea Vault site, or I could send the report document electronically if that's easier.

If it's not appropriate for me to have sent you this email directly, then I sincerely apologize for the mistake. If you're typically not the person who would review an idea like this, again please accept my apology, and recommend who you think that person might be.

Thanks for your consideration,

 - Jack Franzino

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wireless Spectrum - Creating a New Commodity Market

One cornerstone of Enron's success is its ability to create new markets where none existed before?
not just dominate markets, or compete for increased market share, but actually create new markets.
Continuing that innovative spirit, wireless spectrum presents another opportunity to create a new market,
since no secondary market currently exists for exchanging this valuable resource. The demand for wireless
communications continues to skyrocket; however, there is a limited supply of spectrum available for
commercial use. The Federal Communications Commission is in the initial stages of change in its regulatory
policies governing spectrum allocation. Mix these regulatory changes into a market of tight supply and high
demand, and the commodity trading of wireless spectrum becomes an extraordinary opportunity for Enron.


eSource presents Dow Jones Interactive training
Attend one of our Dow Jones Interactive Personalizing/Customizing DJI and
Custom Clips Clinics:

April 27   1:00 - 2:00 PM  EB564
     2:00 - 3:00 PM EB564
     3:00 - 4:00 PM EB564

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928

The Cost is $25.00 Per Person
No Shows will be charged $50.00

* Please bring your Dow Jones Interactive login ID and password. If you don't
have one, a guest ID will be provided.

Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations

http://esource.enron.com


Thursday Am is fine.  I will try to be home by 7 on Thursday.
Carol


---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 09/28/99 03:20 PM
---------------------------

Elsa Villarreal
09/28/99 02:43 PM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Exhibit B -- Nom Form

---------------------- Forwarded by Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT on 09/28/99 02:42
PM ---------------------------

"Chad W. Cass" <CWCASS@duke-energy.com> on 09/28/99 02:13:32 PM
To: Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "Cheryl L. Horning" <clhorning@duke-energy.com>
Subject: Exhibit B -- Nom Form

(See attached file: etgs_nomform97.xls)

 - etgs_nomform97.xls


Start Date: 4/14/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041401.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 1 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:  19.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_TOBY
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Hey Kate! I received a BPA trade that Mike/Greg did and under Special
Provisions on their confirmation it reads:

This is a remarket of Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Company power. KAC's
point-to-point transmission agreement will be utilized. KAC's scheduling
agent may request changes to the delivery point(s) under alternate point of
delivery capabilities associated with KAC's transmission agreement. BPA shall
accommodate the scheduling of such changes.

Is this language o.k. ?

Kimberly Indelicato


yes positively- this day has been horrible - I'll call you on Wed

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	drusso@reliant.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-drusso+40reliant+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 26, 2001 1:41 PM
To:	Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	Re: Meet

can we meet thursday anytime just so we can finish before 2:30 or friday
later in the afternoon

This communication is CONFIDENTIAL
and protected by the ATTORNEY-CLIENT
and WORK PRODUCT privileges.

Dede Russo
Senior Attorney
Reliant Energy Law Department
1111 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Phone: (713) 207-5240
Fax: (713) 207-9572
E-Mail: drusso@reliantenergy.com


Gary,

I have also been speaking to Johnnie Brown in San Antonio to be the general contractor.  According to Johnnie, I would not be pay any less buying from the factory versus purchasing the panels through him since my site is within his region.  Assuming this is true, I will work directly with him.  I believe he has sent you my plans.  They were prepared by Kipp Flores architects.

Can you confirm that the price is the same direct from the factory or from the distributor?  If you have the estimates worked up for Johnnie will you please email them to me as well?

Thank you for your time.  I am excited about potentially using your product.

Phillip Allen


It version.

Funny how it reads like mine first memo.

keep you posted.

thanks

bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob M Hall/NA/Enron on 04/09/2001 04:55
PM ---------------------------
From: Tommy Yanowski/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/06/2001 09:26 AM
To: Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Long/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: HPL I.T. Services Transition Summary

Attached is a document that attempts to summarize the HPL transition related
to IT Services.  Please review and let me know your thoughts.  -  Tommy


We need to run a little project over the next week or so.

I think it is time that you have someone inventory all the projects you have
going in your group, sit down and go over them with me and then you and I
make sure they still have support from a business unit or make sense at all.
Some of them involve IT resources and some don't.

I just want to take a breath for a moment and make sure every project you are
doing (outside the daily operations that are so critical) is necessary and
still has a sponsor at a business unit.  If not, we can stop several side
projects and focus on the critical ones, save some money and make sure we get
the 5 to 10 things that absolutely have to be done completed.

Your thoughts?

GP


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/04/2000 09:39 AM -----

	James D Steffes
	10/05/2000 09:00 PM

		 To: Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeannie
Mandelker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alhamd
Alkhayat/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Competition PR Strategy Update

So that we continue to drive our activities with our Public Affairs strategy,
we have asked Alhamd to coordinate our material and project timeline.  We are
also asking Jeanie Mandelker to take the lead in working through our
different material to put into one look and feel.

Please let Alhamd know of your activities so that we are able to better
coordinate any bottlenecks.  Also, please forward to Alhamd and Jeanie all
prior work that has been done so that they are in the loop.

Attached the original gameplan.

Jim


Sounds tempting, but I'm otherwise committed.  DF

Paul Gertsen <paulg@stpaul.lib.mn.us> on 09/22/2000 11:59:48 AM
To: Drew Fossum <Drew_Fossum@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: cam (fwd)

Hey -

I just found out there's a live web cam right down the block from the
library, focused on a Snoopy statue.

If I go stand there at 1:30 central
 will you  take a look?

I'll send the address - I checked it out. It works.

Should we try it?

pkg


Larry,  I made a few changes and filled in the blanks.  Please call me to
discuss.


Thanks to each of you who help in the review process yesterday.  As many of you know, we found that several of the contracts that we reviewed did reconcile with the Total Exposure (in other words, the agreements were not the right ones).  Eric Moon and Russell Diamond are working with IT, Credit and Risk to access deal specific information in a way that will let us link deal numbers to contract numbers.  Thereafter we can get the right agreements and finish the process.  I will update you later today on the status.  If you have any questions, please ask.
Ed


This is an automatic confirmation of the order you have placed using IT
Central.

Request Number:   ECTH-4PKS7Y
Order For:               Maureen Raymond

1 x ( Standard Desktop     $1319 )

Enron IT Purchasing


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Power Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Power Delivered on Tuesday, October   23, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Monday, October   22, 2001)
Click here to access index history .
                                                                                * volume represents sell-side only *

Hub	High	Low	Wtd Avg Index	Change ($)	Vol (Mwh)
Cinergy	         $23.00	         $19.25	         $20.50	-    .34	          40,800
Comed	         $20.00	         $18.75	         $18.91	-    .87	           8,800
Entergy	        $210.00	         $20.00	         $29.93	+   9.29	          19,200
Nepool	         $38.00	         $37.25	         $37.50	-    .87	          11,200
Palo Verde	         $27.75	         $25.50	         $27.09	-    .28	          13,200
PJM-West	         $25.00	         $24.00	         $24.21	-   1.10	          40,800
SP-15	         $27.75	         $27.00	         $27.35	+    .12	          14,400
TVA	         $21.50	         $20.25	         $20.63	-    .83	           7,200

                                                                                Includes all trades done from 6 AM to 11 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for financially firm power delivered during the on-peak hours (6 AM - 10 PM CPT for Eastern hubs / 6 AM - 10 PM Pacific Prevailing Time for Western hubs) on the delivery date(s) specified.
                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.
You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com .
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe .
                                                                                ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


Enron employees may find the current circumstances stressful.  We want to remind you that Enron's Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is still available and currently offering services to assist you and your family.

Group Discussions
Beginning this week, Enron's EAP provider, Innovative Resources Group, will be facilitating group discussions for employees who are interested in attending. These sessions are designed to address the challenges employees may be facing and to suggest ways to minimize the impact of stress on employees and their families. These sessions will be held on Wednesday, January 30 and Thursday, January 31 at the following times in EB32C2:

	9:00 am -- 10:00 am
	11:00 am -- 12:00 pm
	1:30  pm --  2:30 pm
	3:30 pm --   4:30 pm

No advance registration is necessary -- simply come to EB32C2 at the scheduled day and time that is most convenient for you.

Onsite Confidential Counseling / 24 Hour Hotline
EAP Counselors are available for individual, confidential appointments onsite in the Enron Building or at a variety of neighborhood locations.  Counselors are also available via telephone 24 hours a day, seven days a week for Enron employees in all locations.  The EAP counseling service is provided at no cost to employees and their family members.  To schedule an appointment or speak with a counselor, please call the onsite office at 713-853-6057 or the 24-hour number at 1-800-345-1391.

Informational Brochures
Additional information about EAP programs will be available in the Body Shop, the Health Center on the third floor of Enron Center North and soon in the common kitchen areas on all floors of the Enron Buildings.

Websites
The following links may also provide helpful information:
www.stress.org -- This is the website of the American Institute of Stress. The site provides general information on stress management and links to other related sites.
www.wellnessjunction.com -- This website has been developed by Health Resources Publishing and provides targeted information on trends in wellness and health promotion.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/22/2000 10:55
AM ---------------------------

"William J. Harmon" <wjharmon@JonesDay.com> on 11/22/2000 09:43:30 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Peoples Letter Agreement

Looks great to me.  I'm glad to know (as a NS customer) that my gas won't
be cut off this COLD November.

Bill Harmon
wjharmon@jonesday.com
312-269-4160
Fax: 312-782-8585

                    Kay.Mann@enron.c
                    om                   To:     wjharmon@jonesday.com
                                         cc:
                                         Subject:     Peoples Letter Agreement
                    11/22/00 08:35
                    AM

Any problem with this?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/22/2000 08:35
AM ---------------------------

From: Gregg Penman on 11/21/2000 05:00 PM

To:   Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:   Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:  Peoples Letter Agreement

Kay - Here is my attempt to turn the term sheet into something executable.
I have accepted all of William Harmon's changes except for the second
paragraph under amended terms.  William used the wording "The payment late
payment amount is calculated...".  I changed it to "The payment interest on
overdue amounts is calculated..." to be consistent with the reference in
the above paragraph.  I don't think this changes any substance, but I defer
to you.  I think that is all I changed.  I also added a quick intro. and a
paragraph on future payments to reiterate this is only for October
purchases.  Neither may be necessary, let me know.  I am not sure your
availability tomorrow, but I would love to hear from you ASAP in the
morning to get this in front of Peoples for signature.  Russell Diamond is
coordinating the internal Enron approvals with Global Finance, Credit and
RAC.

Thanks again for your help on your vacation day.

Gregg

(See attached file: Payment Delay Term Sheet.doc)

(See attached file: Payment Delay Term Sheet.doc)

==========
The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains
information that may be confidential, be protected by the attorney-client
or other applicable privileges, or constitute non-public information.  It
is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by
replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Use,
dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
==========

 - Payment Delay Term Sheet.doc


Don,
I will get that to you by noon on Thursday.

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Don.Baughman@enron.com [mailto:Don.Baughman@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 3:00 PM
To: jeff.maack@ipgdirect.com
Subject: Re: TradersNews

Jeff,

Trade ya.  Can you get me the Cinergy & CE indices on a spreadsheet from
inception to now?

I'm compiling that list of names for you right now.

Drop you a line later in the day.

Later,

Don
EPMI
713.853.0392


Hi Louise,

Is this going to be the new name or is it a working name?  If it is the actual name, we can get the verisign registration done, and begin some graphics work.  Otherwise, I'll hold on that.

--jay


FYI.  New amendments out on DA that Keeley's accepted that I'm faxing to you right now.  Also, it's 82XX we're talking about, not 83XX.  83XX is the bill that Wright's authoring with the Rs.

Also faxing to you Reliant's "Dear Dunn, Go to Hell, Sincerely, Reliant" letter.

Best,
Jeff

Vegas still sez best odds are on Edison going in.

	James D Steffes 07/18/2001 03:48 PM 	   To: David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Belden/Enron@EnronXGate, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Richter/Enron@EnronXGate  cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron  Subject: Potential Legislative Suspension of DA in California

The games continue in California.

The date of suspension now being considered in 83xx is July 12.  We are still working (1) to define this in a way that is favorable to getting our recent DASR group authorized for DA service or (2) supporting some other solution.

Will keep everyone informed as information comes in.

By the way, I've asked Evan Hughes for a detailed listing of how moving the date impacts our success ratio.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 07/18/2001 03:43 PM ---------------------------
From:	Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/18/2001 11:47 AM
To:	Kevin Keeney/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Bert Frazier/ENRON@enronXgate, Lamar Frazier/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject:	FW: California Update--0717.01

Both 82XX and 83XX are to be discussed in committee today.  Significantly, an amendment that is expected to be included in 82XX would establish July 12 as the start date for when the PUC may not authorize any new or replacement direct transactions.

By contrast, 83XX directs the commission to authorize direct transactions on an open enrollment basis not less than 2 times each year, conicident with the expiration of DWR purchases.

Nothing more yet from the CPUC on its intended action.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 7:31 PM
To:	skean@enron.com; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James; Mara, Susan; Kingerski, Harry; Lawner, Leslie; Tribolet, Michael; Walsh, Kristin; Denne, Karen; mpalmer@enron.com; Guerrero, Janel; Kaufman, Paul; Susan M Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate; Robertson, Linda
Subject:	California Update--0717.01

What people know:

Hertzberg (et al's) bill (82XX)was heard in an "informational" hearing today and still sits in the Assembly Energy Committee.  It will be heard again tomorrow (perhaps beginning at 10 AM) , at which time parties will have a chance to support/oppose and ask for amendments.  Most, including us, oppose unless significantly amended.
The Wright (D) -Richman (R) bill (83XX)was heard in an "informational" hearing today and still sits in the Assembly Energy Committee.  It will be heard again tomorrow, at which time parties will have a chance to support/oppose and ask for amendments.  From our perspective, this is the best bill out there yet, though it still has serious problems---it isn't available electronically yet, but should be tomorrow, and I'll distribute then.  The chances of the joint D-R bill being successful are slim, however, since it's up against the Speakers competing bill.  There is talk that the Speaker will try to negotiate with Wright/Richman tonight and include any agreement in his bill (82XX).
The original version of the Governor's MOU bill sits in the Senate.  Most believe that Burton will put it up for a vote this week and it will fail.
The Senate's version of the MOU (Sher-Peace-Kuehl) (78XX)came out today.  It will likely be heard in the committee tomorrow or the next day.  Notably, it kills Direct Access completely and makes Edison shareholders responsible for that portion of Edison's debt owed to suppliers.  In short, a very bad bill.
Burton's 18XX, which would de-link the bond issuance (to pay back the General Fund) from the DWR contracts is likely to pass the Senate tomorrow or the next day.  Many--including Enron--support the bill (though we are supporting it behind the scenes).

What people don't know:
Whether there's the time or the will in the Assembly and Senate to achieve by Friday a single, comprehensive bill that can be sent to the governor for his signature.
Whether the Legislature would postpone its month-long recess if the Legislature hasn't finished a bill by Friday (most folks think they will not postpone).
Whether it's true that, irrespective of the energy issue, the Legislature will fail to get the budget completed by Friday and therefore have to postpone their recess anyway, in which case they might continue to work on the energy legislation at the same time.

Odds-makers still say it's better than 50-50 that the Legislature does not get the Edison bills done by Friday and leaves on on its 30-day vacation.

Best,
Jeff

Sacramento is one goofy place.


Thomas P. Morrissey
17955 County Road 48.8
Aguilar, CO 81020
thom@raresteeds.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Thomas P. Morrissey


The TW offsite has been scheduled for Tuesday, April 24 from 11:30 - 5:00 at the Doubletree in the De Zavala A room.
Lunch will be provided.  I will send an agenda out later.  If you have any suggestions on agenda items, please get them to me as soon as possible.

Thanks


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001
06:22 PM ---------------------------
From: Richard Tomaski@ENRON on 04/05/2001 09:43 AM
To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2:30 meeting

Going forward, only Cary and I will be listening in on the 2:30 meeting, so
feel to say whatever you want.


Kay,

Ader and I met with NJ Natural Gas earlier this week to discuss fuel cell
opportunities in NJ.  As a gas supplier in NJ, these guys are very interested
in developing some fuel cell projects as a means to increase throughput on
their system.  They also have a strong relationship with the state commission
(called the Board of Public Utilities, I think) and there are green funds
available to subsidize costs, etc.  Sound familiar?

I need to get a CA to these guys and I am forwarding to you the one we signed
with CRRA.  I like this one because there is an exclusivity clause in it.
NJN may not agree to exclusivity, but it doesn't hurt to ask.

Here's the contact:

Mr. Thomas J. Kononowitz
Senior Vice President Marketing Services
NJ Natural Gas
1415 Wyckoff Road
P.O. Box 1464
Wall, NJ  07719

732.938.1134

Will you or someone in your cluster take care of this for me?  Much thanks.

Heather


we might get together a little earlier depending on the time of the TEXAS/lsu
game!
and it is margaritas, babe!

Shanna Husser@ENRON
06/05/2000 10:39 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, MMMarcantel@equiva.com,
val.generes@ac.com
cc:
Subject:

Hey guys!  Christen and I are going to have a cookout/pool gathering Saturday
around 4 or so.  Consider yourselves invited.  We will have food and
margueritas.  Christen is buying some beer- but I don't know what type.  So-
if you have your own little preference- you might want to bring it.  Just let
me know by Friday- so we can kind of plan numbers.

Shanna


The Gas Trading Messaging System is ready for everyone to use.  Here is the
link to the site.  Please let everyone know so they can start using it.

http://gasmsgboard.dev.corp.enron.com

For questions, contact the below:

Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net


what are you trying to show me?

this just sends me to the ap website

Brian Hoskins
08/25/2000 11:34 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

http://wire.ap.org/?FRONTID=MCOLBASKETBALL


Paul Simons has asked me to forward these documents to you in connection with
the above.

Regards.

Nina

---------------------- Forwarded by Nina Edmonds/LON/ECT on 26/07/2000 14:22
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Documents <Documents@ISDA-EUR.ORG>
25/07/2000 16:37

To: Nina.Edmonds@enron.com
cc:

Subject: GREEKPR2107

 <<ProtocolGreece - 21Jul00.DOC>> (Word Document)

 <<LegalMemo - 21Jul00.pdf>> (PDF Document)

Please find attached the following two documents:

EMU PROTOCOL (GREECE)
1. A draft of the EMU Protocol (Greece), marked to show changes from
the originally published EMU Protocol
2. A supporting memorandum re: the EMU Protocol (Greece)

Please review internally and forward your comments as specified in the
memos, by Monday 4 September 2000.

Please note that this e-mail reply system is entirely automatic and incoming
emails will not be read by ISDA staff.
Please contact ISDA's European Office on +44 20 7330 3550 or
isda@isda-eur.org should you encounter any problems accessing these
documents.

 - ProtocolGreece - 21Jul00.DOC
 - LegalMemo - 21Jul00.pdf


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Shelley A. Corman
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Key Ex
Report Total: $3,203.82
Amount Due Employee: $3,203.82

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Please set up the following people with "trader" status under Transwestern
Pipeline Company.  We will be using Enron On Line to trade pipeline
capacity.  Kevin Hyatt (administrator), Michelle Lokay, Lorraine Lindberg,
Jeff Fawcett, and TK Lohman will all need this access.  My network user ID is
"mlokay" and each trader will respond with their own user ID.  Thanks.


Sally

Thank you for taking the time to see me when I was in Houston, and for lunch.

I am working on a detailed comprehensive plan of action to enact the changes
we discussed re the settlement and confirmations procedures transfer. Due to
the volume of work that was on my desk upon my return this is not coming
together quite as quickly as I would like and therefore we are going to have
to look at it piece by piece.

We need to issue a new authorised signatory list this week for Enron
Australia Energy and Enron Australia Finance Pty Ltd due to changes in the
dealer structure and therefore we have decided that this would be a good
opportunity to make the change to the approval of confirmations.

As agreed, we will have Sydney office take over responsibility for signing
all confirmations. This means they are still prepared in Sydney, as they are
now, with the change of procedure being that they will now be signed in
Sydney and faxed from here to our clients. The primary signatories will be
the Managing Director (Paul Quilkey) or the Chief Financial Officer (Heidi
Mason). In the event of both being unavailable they will be signed by the
Senior Legal Counsel (David Minns).

The confirmation log will be maintained in its entirety by Sydney Office and
will be held in a directory accessible by Houston. This will allow
independent audit review to occur as required.

In order to implement this change we have prepared a new authorised
signatories list which we are planning to distribute at the end of this week.
In the meantime could you please advise of what action needs to be taken in
Houston to ensure all the relevant areas are advised. Clearly a  key
individual will be Sue Frusco. When I met with Sue in Houston we discussed
briefly the fact that you and I had agreed that invoicing and confirmations
would move to Sydney but at that stage there was no timing raised. Sue seemed
happy to stay with the current arrangements until such time as we implemented
a change. Do you want me to advise Sue or will someone from Houston speak to
her?

Thanks

Heidi


Rick:
Here is the file with the performance data we worked on for the 2000's.  A
Brownsville tab has been added - could you please assist us in putting this
data together for Brownsville.  Please give me a call if you have any
questions.  Thanks!
Ben


Dwight,

Have the current documents come in yet?  Do I understand correctly that all
of the documents (6 plus amendments) that John McEwen forwarded us have been
replaced by new versions?  I'd like to have read through the latest deal
before Thursday.

Thanks,

Steve

	Dwight Beach
	12/18/2000 11:03 AM

		 To: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reagan
Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Glenn Wright/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: ReUse Technologies

---------------------- Forwarded by Dwight Beach/HOU/ECT on 12/18/2000 11:01
AM ---------------------------

Rebecca Serwin@ENRON
12/18/2000 10:06 AM
To: Dwight Beach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ReUse Technologies

2934   1:30 - 3:30

Dwight Beach@ECT
12/18/2000 09:47 AM
To: Rebecca Serwin/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: ReUse Technologies

Will you get us a conference room for this meeting.  We are probably going to
have around 7 to 10 people.

---------------------- Forwarded by Dwight Beach/HOU/ECT on 12/18/2000 09:46
AM ---------------------------

Dwight Beach
12/15/2000 12:05 PM
To: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Glenn Wright/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ReUse Technologies

I have confirmed Dec 21st at 1:30 in Houston with Kris Johnson and Virgil
Hutchinson to start discussing the renegotiation/extension of the coal and
ash handling agreements for both the Lumberton and Elizabethtown plants.

Kris is going to Fedex to us:
 1) the most current agreements with Cogentrix re the Facilities (apparently
we don't have the most recent documents).
 2) the current property tax records
 3) a recent environmental assessment that ReUse had done.


Richard asked me to send you this letter for Dave Delainey.


Good afternoon Rev. Jackson.

So nice to hear from you, I'm glad we';ve got this e-mail business figured
out.  Hope your day is going well.  Sometime, please tell me what "A Day in
the Life of Rev. Jackson" is like at SWCBC.  Do you see alot of people all
day long (during the day)?  So often, it's hard to picture the church as
being active all day long.  It just seems like people attend meetings and
services about twice a week in the evenings.  Funny, how we get perceptions
in our heads.

My day is going pretty good so far, I'm back to making money in my "book"
here at work and it sure feels good.  I've always remembered what you told me
during my "crisis period" and always keep those things in mind.  The one that
I like the best is "Just keep your mind stayed on him, He'll keep you in
perfect peace".  I take that with me everywhere I go.

Well, anyway, thanks for the words of encouragement.

Appreciate it!