here is our bet on cu/a&m game this summer.  i have cu -8.  we can think of a dinner later.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 11:12 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

sounds exciting.  want to go to dinner with me before you have your 'matt
time'?

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:45 AM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

probablyl gonna just kick it

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
NRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 10:41 AM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   i haven't thought about it yet.  what are you doing

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:30 AM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   you know, whatever.  i will let you know later.  what are you doing
   tonight.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
   NRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 9:57 AM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      like what?

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:51 AM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      i can think of a few things

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
      NRON@ENRON.com]

         Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 9:47 AM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         i was just kidding.  i am very sweet.  i feel terrible that you
      didn't
         sleep
         well. if there was anything i could do to make you feel better i
      would.

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:47 AM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         real sweet.  you have a stone heart.

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
         NRON@ENRON.com]

            Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 9:38 AM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            of course you don't.  you just dream up these things so i will
      feel
            sorry
            for you, i don't.  you slept fine.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
            Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:10 AM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject: RE:

            um, i don't remember that.

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
            NRON@ENRON.com]

               Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 9:00 AM
               To:     Lenhart, Matthew
               Subject:  RE:

               that's your fault.  you were taking up over half of the bed,
   i
      had
         to
               ask
               you to move over.  and then you kept coughing in the middle
   of
      the
            night
               and
               waking me up. so, i did not sleep well. you probably slept
      better
            than
               me, i
               don't know what you're complaining about.

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
      [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
               Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 8:53 AM
               To: erichardson@sarofim.com
               Subject: RE:

               i am tired b/c i kept waking up with no covers and my butt
   was
            hanging
               off
               the bed. i looked at you and you were covered up to your
   neck
      with
            the
               covers in the middle of the bed.  you look like you slept
   well.

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
               NRON@ENRON.com]

                  Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 8:45 AM
                  To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                  Subject:  RE:

                  i know, me too.  but isn't she so cute?  i love her,
   she's
      the
            best.

                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
                  Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 8:12 AM
                  To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                  Subject:

                  i am tired.  your dog kept me up all night.

   **********************************************************************
                  This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
      relevant
               affiliate
                  and
                  may contain confidential and privileged material for the
      sole
         use
            of
               the
                  intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
            disclosure
               by
                  others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
   intended
            recipient
               (or
                  authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
   the
            sender
               or
                  reply
                  to Enron Corp. at
   enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
      and
            delete
                  all
                  copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
      hereto)
            are
               not
                  intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
   create
      or
               evidence
                  a
                  binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or
   any
      of
            its
                  affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
   party,
      and
         may
               not
                  be
                  relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
   estoppel
      or
               otherwise.
                  Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Jeff,

As of Dec 14th, Enron received the message regarding David Spurlin greater
involvement in the EBS relationship.   In the past, EBS had included David on
the direction of our relationship and not the details.   Our prior direction
was to have Derrick Deakins as our key point of communication.

In regards to your comment about amending the Agreement.   I would like to
fill yourself, David and Bob in on some history.   During the meetings in
August 2000,  EBS and Compaq reviewed the Agreement line by line and
identified 5 sections to be clarified / amended.  There was a group of at
least 8 Compaq attendees (Chris Sweet took extensive notes for Compaq).  Both
EBS and Compaq agreed on the methodology to calculate the value of the Compaq
Minimum Annual Spend of EBS Services.   Spreadsheets were exchanged between
both Parties and the amounts were agreed upon.   A significant amount of time
was spent in this process between August through October.   EBS and Compaq
(Derrick Deakins) developed contract language to clarify the outstanding 5
sections.   This contract amendment was sent to Compaq (Rob and Derrick) for
comments in November.   EBS has not heard anything regarding the language.
During the course of these discussions, EBS agreed to concede on certain
points of interpretation on the Server Purchase Agreement and Compaq agreed
to work with EBS to achieve revenue recognition in 2000.   The EBS
concessions were used by both Parties to develop the methodology to calculate
the Compaq Minimum Spend toward EBS Services.  This was reason for the
development of the EBS Consulting Payment ($832,000).

EBS looks forward to the resolution of these issues and moving forward with
our relationship.

Kim Godfrey
Director, Enterprise Services
Enron Broadband Services
phone : 713 345 8813
cell :      713 501 8105
fax:        713 853 7354

	Jeff.Gooden@compaq.com
	12/18/00 07:58 PM

		 To: Kim Godfrey/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Compaq / EBS Relationship

Kim,

Thank you for including me in this email...I agree, without question, Dave
Spurlin "Owns" the Enron/Compaq relationship, from Compaq's perspective.
All matters should go through Dave...Thank you, this will make your life
easier.

Although I was not in the entire meeting with yourself, Keith and Rob; My
reaction was that this agreement needs to be amended to protect both Enron
and Compaq.  We are both exposed to potential unnecessary pitfalls that are
clearly evident in the original agreement.

We look forward to resolving this issue, amending this agreement, and moving
forward in the partnership between Enron and Compaq.

Sincerely,

Jeff Gooden
Enterprise Sales Manager
Compaq Computer Corporation
(281) 927-3500

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim_Godfrey@enron.net [mailto:Kim_Godfrey@enron.net]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 5:54 PM
To: Gooden, Jeff
Subject: Compaq / EBS Relationship

Jeff,

David asked that I include you in future Emails.

thanks,

Kim G
----- Forwarded by Kim Godfrey/Enron Communications on 12/18/00 05:57 PM
-----
|--------+----------------------->
|        |          Kim Godfrey  |
|        |                       |
|        |          12/18/00     |
|        |          05:49 PM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
  |
|
  |       To:     bob.jordan@compaq.com, david.spurlin@compaq.com
|
  |       cc:     Jim Crowder/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
|
  |       Everett Plante/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tracy
|
  |       Prater/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
|
  |       derrick.deakins@compaq.com, Gil Melman/Enron Communications@Enron
|
  |       Communications
|
  |       Subject:     Compaq / EBS Relationship
|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|

David and Bob,

We look forward to working with you to strengthen the Compaq and EBS
relationship.   EBS has identified potential server business opportunities
(storage, streaming media) where our two organizations can work together.
After
our meeting on Dec 14th, EBS now understands to utilize David Spurlin as the
point person for these communications.  EBS had prior direction from Compaq
to
direct our discussions to Derrick Deakins, Rob Senders, Keith McAuliffe or
Kent
Major.  Tracy Prater and myself look forward to spending additional time
with
David to ensure that he is aware of the EBS business opportunities and
issues.

EBS had invested significant dollars, time and energy with Compaq to develop
the
streaming media server solutions.  We discussed during the Dec 14th meeting
that
there are decisions to be made regarding the existing Product and Server
Supply
Agreement that are contingent on those streaming media solutions.  EBS and
Compaq have both acted in good faith to achieve the intent of the Product
and
Server Supply Agreement in pursuing these solutions.  To that end, EBS has
had
internal discussions regarding the appropriate next steps to further our
relationship.

The January 2000 Product and Service Supply Agreement is the legal framework
for
our relationship until both parties mutually agree to change.  Until those
changes are made:
1) 2000 Compaq Annual Purchase of ECI Services:  Per the Agreement, Compaq
was
invoiced for the 2000 Minimum Annual Purchase of ECI Services on November 7,
2000 as per Sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3.  Compaq had agreed  to the invoice
amount.  EBS expects payment for the total invoice as outlined in Section
3.0 on
or before December 31,2000.
2) Potential for Agreement Termination:  Prior to the Dec 14th meeting,
Compaq
(Keith and Rob) have discussed this with EBS (Jim Crowder, myself).   The
understanding between both Parties was that EBS would need a written notice
and
payment by Compaq of $2,500,000.  The concept to start over with a new
contractual agreement was again discussed during the Dec 14th meeting.  EBS
strongly believes in the value of the Compaq and EBS relationship, if Compaq
believes that to start over with a new agreement is necessary then we look
forward to working with Compaq to achieve that goal.

Again, we look forward to working with yourselves to identify and create
strategic business opportunities for both EBS and Compaq.

Kim Godfrey
Director, Enterprise Services
Enron Broadband Services
phone : 713 345 8813
cell :      713 501 8105
fax:        713 853 7354


Here are some more
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/27/2000 02:45 PM ---------------------------

Heidi Boyd
12/27/99 02:25 PM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: NIMO JAN 2000

FINAL

Hi Morgan,

Please schedule the following (in DTH's) off of CNG to Niagra Mohawk:

Pooled  East Meter 20550 821/day
  West Meter 20500    421/ day

Balanced East Meter 20550 381/day
(firm)  West Meter 20500 430/day

Thanks!


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 03:07 PM ---------------------------

	  From:  Jason Sokolov                           05/02/2001 01:18 PM

To:	Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Stuart Hamel's paper

---------------------- Forwarded by Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 01:18 PM ---------------------------

"Stuart Hamel" <srhamel@duke-energy.com> on 05/02/2001 12:03:26 PM
To:	jason.sokolov@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	paper

(See attached file: paper3.doc)

 - paper3.doc


Hi!
Check this out!   Fiction Bestseller List
God is good!
Kathleen Y'Barbo
Saving Grace, YELLOW ROSES Anthology, Barbour Publishing, March 2001
Robyn's Garden, THE ENGLISH GARDEN, Barbour Publishing, January 2002
PENNED FROM THE HEART, SonRise Press, November 2000
http://hometown.aol.com/kybarbo/myhomepage/index.html
"Leap and the net will appear."......Goethe


Dave - my comments are below in red.  I'm assuming that "end of the day" is
the end of the trading day, but this seems a bit ambiguous since the trader
in Japan may be thinking about a different "day" than the trader in London,
etc.  Will the orders be cancelled if our trader removes a product during the
day and then reactivates it?

	David Forster@ENRON
	08/21/2000 05:57 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Price Limit Order Language

Mark,

Further to our conversation today; How is this?

You have offered a price limit order for aaa mmbtus of yyyyy at a price of
xxx. If the price you specified becomes available on EnronOnline, the system
will automatically try to fill your submission and a transaction may result.
Your submission may be filled partially or completely depending on the volume
available. This submission will remain active until for the earlier of (i) xx
hours and yy minutes from your submission, or  (ii) until you cancel it (by
highlighting it and pressing the cancel button on the main screen), or (iii)
the end of the day. The submission  will not be withdrawn by your logout.
Price limit orders are processed by price and then by timestamp. Therefore,
if other price limit orders for the same price have been submitted before
yours, then they will be filled before your submission is filled. This can
result in other transactions completing at the same price as your price limit
order, while your price limit order does not complete.


These have been changed to CAISO.

	From:  Sharen Cason                           04/10/2001 02:21 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: corrections

I feel like I am picking on you today!

These deals have NP/SP delivery point with firm energy.

577829
577828

Thanks!


pls print.  thanks. df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/29/2001
09:06 PM ---------------------------

Kevin Hyatt
01/29/2001 05:56 PM
To: Dale Ratliff/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: ECS

Darrell and Dale, below are the dates and hours last year for each month that
Tri-State's system peak occurred.  In your estimation, during these peak
times, could TW have turned down Gallup and avoided peak demand charges
without impacting system volume and demand?

May 23, 2000 9pm
June 22  7pm
July 7  4pm
Aug 14  9pm
Sept 5  9pm
Oct 23  8pm
Nov 17  7pm
Dec 18  7pm
Jan 2, 2001 7pm

Notice the evening hour trend here?  Let me know what you find out.  Thanks
kh

Steven Harris
01/29/2001 01:56 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, James
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha Benner/Enron@EnronXGate, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: ECS

I will be available anytime Thursday after 9:30am. I am not sure what dollar
amount because no one has told me what we lost. Yes, we are negotiating with
them on some other deals that Lindy is working through at this time.

Drew Fossum
01/29/2001 01:24 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, James
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha Benner/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: ECS

I've got a meeting set up with Knippa at 10:00 on Thursday .  Susan, please
join me as Nemec will be there and he and you had most of the back and forth
on the confidentiality issue.  Either Steve or Kevin need to give me some
sense of our  authority .  Any thoughts on that??  Is the number still
$200,000?  What would we be willing to settle for?  Is a renegotiation of the
existing deal in the works anyway as part of the expansion scenarios?  I'll
have martha set up a meeting Thur. am to discuss before we talk to Knippa.
DF


Steve Kean and Jeff Dasovich

	"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
	11/22/2000 11:12 AM
	Please respond to kaplan

		 To: <kaplan@iepa.com>, <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'John Stout for Reliant'"
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Curtis Keebler at Reliant'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julie @ Edson'" <jmball@ns.net>,
"'Paula Hall-Collins'" <paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Marty Wilson'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'Rob Lamkin'" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Karen
Edson" <kedson@ns.net>, "Bob Weisenmiller" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "Sue Mara"
<smara@enron.com>, "Andy Brown" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, "B Brown Andy"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "Bob Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Greg
Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jan
Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Karen
Denne" <kdenne@enron.com>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Kristin
Vellandi" <kvellandi@pstrategies.com>, "Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>,
"McNally Ray" <rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "Richard Hyde"
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Stephanie-Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Tom Ross" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>,
"William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Trond Aschehoug"
<taschehoug@thermoecotek.com>, "Tony Wetzel" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"Susan J Mara" <Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "Steve Ponder"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steve Iliff" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Scott Noll"
<snoll@thermoecotek.com>, "Roger Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Randy
Hickok" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Paula Soos"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Marty McFadden"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Kent Fickett" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "Ken
Hoffman" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "Joe Greco" <joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jim Willey"
<elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff Dasovich" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Hap Boyd"
<rboyd@enron.com>, "Frank DeRosa" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Eileen Koch"
<eileenk@calpine.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane Nelsen"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "Dean Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "Dave
Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curt Hatton" <curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>,
"Cody Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill Carlson"
<wcarlson@wm.com>, "Eric Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@neg.pge.com>
		 cc: "Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>, "Susan McCabe"
<sfmccabe@mindspring.com>, "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Ron Tom"
<thackbarth@govadv.com>, "Robert Ross" <robbiz@cwo.com>, "Phil Isenberg"
<Isenberg@HMOT.com>, "Mike Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Maureen OHaren"
<Oharen@HMOT.com>, "Marie Moretti" <marie_moretti@msn.com>, "Hedy Govenar"
<hgovenar@acom2.com>, "Delany Hunter" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "Bev
Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>, "Anne Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Jenn Paulsen"
<paulsen@HMOT.com>, "Jamie Parker" <jparker@HMOT.com>
		 Subject: RE: Press Conference-Changed to 2:00

Greetings:

Due to a conflict in the Governors Press Room our Press conference has been
moved to 2:00 on Tuesday.  Please let me know ASAP who will be attending on
behalf of your organization.
Thanks and have a nice Thanksgiving!

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

-----Original Message-----
From: Katie Kaplan [mailto:kaplan@iepa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 4:08 PM
To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; Kelli Norton [knorton@mcnallytemple.com]; 'John
Stout for Reliant'; 'Curtis Keebler at Reliant'; 'Julie @ Edson'; 'Paula
Hall-Collins'; 'Marty Wilson'; 'Rob Lamkin'; Karen Edson; Bob Weisenmiller;
Sue Mara; Andy Brown; B Brown Andy; Bob Escalante; Greg Blue; Jack Pigott;
Jan Smutny-Jones; Joe Ronan; Karen Denne; Karen Edson; Kassandra Gough;
Kristin Vellandi; Lynn Lednicky; McNally Ray; Paula Hall-Collins; Richard
Hyde; Rob L. Lamkin; Stephanie-Newell; Tom Ross; William Hall; Trond
Aschehoug; Tony Wetzel; Susan J Mara; Steve Ponder; Steve Iliff; Scott Noll;
Roger Pelote; Rob Lamkin; Randy Hickok; Paula Soos; Marty McFadden; Lynn
Lednicky; Kent Fickett; Ken Hoffman; Jonathan Weisgall; Joe Ronan; Joe
Greco; Jim Willey; Jeff Dasovich; Jack Pigott; Hap Boyd; Greg Blue; Frank
DeRosa; Eileen Koch; Ed Tomeo; Duane Nelsen; Dean Gosselin; Dave Parquet;
Curtis Kebler; Curt Hatton; Cody Carter; Carolyn Baker; Bob Escalante; Bill
Woods; Bill Carlson; Eric Eisenman
Cc: Jan Smutny-Jones; Steven Kelly; Susan McCabe; Scott Govenar; Ron Tom;
Robert Ross; Phil Isenberg; Mike Monagan; Maureen OHaren; Marie Moretti;
Kassandra Gough; Hedy Govenar; Delany Hunter; Bev Hansen; Anne Kelly; Jenn
Paulsen; Jamie Parker
Subject: Press Conference
Importance: High

Greetings:

IEP will be holding a press conference on Tuesday November 28 at 10:30 a.m.
in the Governors Press room to discuss the importance of long-term fixed
(that term is easier to understand than bilateral) contracts.

IEP will be stressing the importance of the contracts as part of the
solution for next summer. Several IEP members have offered (and have
continued to offer) long-term fixed contracts at terms under the current
retail rate freeze.  We will indicate that the utilities have been hesitant
to enter into these contracts due to the uncertain nature of the CPUC.  We
will point out that several different independent entities have agreed that
long-term contracts are one of the key solutions and that the PUC should act
immediately to set a benchmark and in so doing eliminate the reasonableness
review that is the main barrier for IOU's not entering into large long-term
fixed contracts.

IEP is also currently working to include other market participants in the
Press Conference.

We would like as many IEP participants as possible at the conference to show
that there are several companies who continue to be serious about long-term
fixed price contracts. We have already received a couple of responses and if
you are interested please let me know ASAP-no later than noon Wednesday- as
we are sending out an advisory on Monday.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499


Here's my stab at it:

I'll be in an off site the rest of the day.  I have no pride of authorship.

I'm unclear which entity will be signing the agreements, so I've left some
[]'s.


I have called TVA's in house counsel to determine how the press learned about
the settlement. here is theconfidentiality provision.----- Forwarded by
Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2001 09:39 AM -----

	"Robert J. Madden" <Rmadden@Gibbs-Bruns.com>
	03/02/2001 09:31 AM

		 To: "'Richard B Sanders'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: TVA

Richard:  The following is the text of paragraph 13 of the settlement
agreement:

 The parties agree that they will not disclose this Agreement, or any
matter relating thereto or to the underlying dispute to any third party
without the prior written consent of the other party; provided however, that
nothing in this Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release shall limit or
prohibit the ability of any Party, without the knowledge or consent of any
other Party, to make legally required disclosure in response to regulatory
or financial inquiries (including those for accounting purposes), subpoenas,
or to discharge any disclosure obligations they may have under any
applicable federal or state laws, or to disclose the terms of this
Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release to any regulatory agency having
jurisdiction over one or more of the Parties.


Hoyt,

If GSP LLC  would assume the liability at the time of return, why would it
risk bringing them back for light duty work?  Why not wait until they are
fully released, particularly if one of them is going to sue under workers
comp scheme?

Also, Hoyt, you need to be careful about revealing conversations with GSP
counsel to MG -- I noticed you had cc'd someone from Media General in the
prior email.  We don't want to waive any privileges.

Michelle

HThomas@gspcorp.com on 11/15/2000 06:10:00 PM
To: peter.del.vecchio@enron.com, david.howe@enron.com
cc: michelle.cash@enron.com, LFaucheaux@media-general.com,
MParker@gspcorp.com
Subject: Privileged and Confidential Communication to my Attorney

     Peter, we have two long-term worker's comp cases whose accidents
     happened before Enron bought GSP.  We would like to bring them back to
     do light-duty work, to get them in the swing of working again and also
     to get some adminstrative work done.

     I am concerned that bringing these employees back to work on light
     duty will cause these cases to become an Enron liability rather than
     an MG liability. I discussed this with Pat McCarthy, the labor and
     employment law attorney we are using in NJ, and he said that the
     liability would typically not transfer to GSP just because we brought
     them back . . . it would still be an MG liability, UNLESS THE EMPLOYEE
     HURT HIMSELF AGAIN.  In which case, GSP owns it.

     However, Pat said that a lot of what determines the ownership of the
     worker's comp cases is written into the purchase and sale agreement.
     He said that there may be language that addresses an employee's return
     to work from worker's comp.  I know that we have an ongoing dispute
     about worker's comp with MG at this point.  What would be your
     recommendation on bringing these employees back to work?

     As a bit of additional info, one of the two employees seems eager to
     come back . . . the other one does not.  An employee told me that the
     second employee actually has a lawsuit filed against MG/old GSP about
     his injury.


John,

Please, give me another day to elaborate. It's quite hectic here.

Vince

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  John Bottomley                           06/21/2000 03:41 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Equity investment Fair Value in Turkey

Vince,

Any further thoughts on your end?

John

Vince J Kaminski
19/06/2000 15:45
To: John Bottomley/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson
Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Equity investment Fair Value in Turkey

John,

It seems to me that using a risk-free rate is not appropriate. I shall
elaborate on my
position and send you a longer message this afternoon (my time).

Vince

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  John Bottomley                           06/19/2000 05:55 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Equity investment Fair Value in Turkey

Vince,

John Sherriff recommended that I contact you regarding an interesting (and
potentially contentious) option valuation issue we are currently dealing with
in London.  We hold longish term options in a private company in Turkey which
is currently seeking to IPO.  The issue we are discussing with RAC is which
discount rate (i.e., risk-free? and if so Turkish or US?) should we use to
value these options

First, some additional information.

Option characteristics:
-- 116,000 options (representing 9% of the company)
-- Term:  minimum of 3 years but possibly longer -- still being renegotiated
-- Strike price:  20% below the upcoming IPO price (either priced in US$ or
Turkish Lire)

We currently hold the above number of options with a fixed price of $118.75
per option but 34,800 expire on July 15, 2000 with the remainder expiring on
December 15, 2000.  The company's investment bankers (ABN / AMRO Rothchilds)
are concerned regarding the strike price because it values the company at
$118 million and they believe the company is worth approx $300 million.  Due
to such a large "valuation gap", they originally encouraged us to exercise
all of the options by the end of June (IPO target date in late Sept / early
Oct).  Our counter-proposal is to "swap" instrinsic value for time value by
repricing the options strike higher while extending their term.

We are currently negotiating with RAC the most appropriate discount rate to
use to value the options.  We are arguing that the US risk free is the most
appropriate discount rate and their current position is that the company's
historical senior debt cost (18%) is the more appropriate number to use
(although admit that this is not justifiable -- only a proxy)

A few key points:
-- RAC is valuing the options via Crystal Ball simulations such that this "to
be negotiated" discount rate is used to calculate the PV of the future
options intrinsic value in 3 years
 (i.e., for Black-Scholes, a higher discount rate yields a higher value but
the opposite is true using Crystal Ball simulation)
-- The model simulates both an IPO / no IPO case and in the case of no IPO we
have put options for our equity priced at a fixed 17% return
-- The model assigns a 30% illiquidity discount
-- In the simulated cases where the options are out-of-the-money, we
obviously do not exercise.

We understand that for Black-Scholes option valuation, one needs to be able
to construct a comparable portfolio of cash flows using equity futures and
the risk free in order for the valuation to hold.  And here is where we reach
our difficulty:  since the company doesn't currently trade on a public market
and since equity futures do not exist for Turkish equities, RAC is arguing
that a US risk free is not appropriate to use.  Our argument is that the
non-IPO scenario, a 30% illiquidity discount and a US$ based option
volatility are already in the factored into the simulation.  As such, we feel
RAC's approach is double counting.

If you managed to get through the above, your a patient man!  I'll give you a
call today or tomorrow after you've had a chance to digest the information.

Regards,
John Bottomley


Byron R. Wien, Managing Director and Chief U.S. Investment Strategist, Morgan
Stanley, will be in Houston and presenting his views on the U.S. capital
markets and the economy.? Mr. Wein received his A.B. from Harvard College and
his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Details follow.?

clip_image002.jpg?

is proud to invite you
to a special evening with

?

Byron R. Wien

Managing Director and U. S. Investment Strategist

Morgan Stanley has the world's top-ranked Equity Research department, and a
key part of that effort is Byron Wien, consistently one of the most widely
read analysts on Wall Street.*? Please join us for a lively and insightful
presentation by Mr. Wien on the current environment for investing.
?

Mr. Wien was a portfolio manager for 20 years prior to joining Morgan Stanley
in January 1985. He received his A.B. with honors from Harvard College and
his M.B.A. with distinction from Harvard Business School.

?????????????????????????????? Place:?? Doubletree Post Oak

?????????????????????????????? 2001 Post Oak Boulevard

?????????????????????????????? Date:?? Wednesday, June 6, 2001

?????????????????????????????? Time:??????????????? 7:00 PM

?

Seating is limited, please RSVP 281-316-7500

?

clip_image003.jpg

??????????????????????????????????????????????????? 711 West Bay Area Blvd,
Ste 320

Webster, Texas 77598

?

?????????? #1 Global Research Team, Institutional Investor, January 2001,
readership statistics from First Call Corp.

Morgan Stanley is a service mark of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.??
Services are offered through Morgan Stanley DW Inc., member SIPC.
?
?Linda Shwab
Vice President
Branch Manager
Southwest Region
WWW.MSDW.COM
?

**** Important Notice to Recipients ****
It is important that you do not use e-mail to request, authorize or effect
the purchase or sale of any security or commodity, to send fund transfer
instructions, or to effect any other transactions.? Any such request, orders,
or instructions that you send will not be accepted and will not be processed
by Morgan Stanley.

 - clip_image002.jpg
 - clip_image003.jpg


Norma:

Ted Murphy would like to have Jason removed from his cost center
effective  December 16th.  Vince said that it would be ok to have him
added to our cost center, effective that date.  He is not supposed to start
with the Research Group until the 28th, but needs a home from the 16th to
the 28th, so we will pick him up.

Can you take care of this?

Thanks!

Shirley
3-5290


My HomeAdvisor
				February 20, 2002
Hot Offers Win a Hawaii trip for two!  5 reasons to buy new  See best-selling plans  [IMAGE] Find It Fast Articles and Tools Cooking and entertaining , Decorating , Gardening , Home valuation , Homes for sale , Loans , Moving , New home plans , Remodeling and repair , Selling    Services Apartments , Contractor , Credit center , Furniture rental , Classmate search , Insurance , Real estate agent , Storage    Shopping Electronics , Home communications , Home office , More shopping    Visit our home electronics center!   	[IMAGE]	 Spring Cleaning and Planting  [IMAGE]  It may not seem like spring is coming when you look out the window, but the season is just a hop, skip, and a jump away. Try these ideas to get ready for spring or visit HomeAdvisor  to explore on your own.  Check the seasonal maintenance planner  Yard work and home improvement Start your seeds indoors  A step-by-step guide Browse the plant showcase  Foxgloves to ferns Clean green in spring  Cleaning with a conscience Create the easy-to-clean kitchen  Tips to save time and elbow-grease Tax help for homeowners  Get the breaks  Also on HomeAdvisor and MSN Estimate any home's value  Plant a kitchen container garden  Caring for container plants  [IMAGE] Featured Offers [IMAGE] A.eSextTitle{ font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold;}A.eSextMerchant{ font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; color:black;}.eSextPromo{ color: #ff6600; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 10px;}.eSextPrice{ font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold;}.eSextSale{ font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold; color: #ff6600;}.eSextMore{ font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; padding-top:3;}[IMAGE] Oxford Gardening Tote & Tools  Oxford Gardening Tote & Tools   $36.00 RedEnvelope  More Gifts for women  A.eSextTitle{ font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold;}A.eSextMerchant{ font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; color:black;}.eSextPromo{ color: #ff6600; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 10px;}.eSextPrice{ font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold;}.eSextSale{ font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold; color: #ff6600;}.eSextMore{ font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; padding-top:3;}[IMAGE] All-Weather Garden Bench  All-Weather Garden Bench   $329.00 L.L.Bean  More Outdoor furniture  	[IMAGE]	Partner Highlights Smart Solutions Setting up your first apartment  Hook up with old friends  Find the right agent for you  Get an auto insurance rate quote    For everything you need in your home, visit HomeAdvisor!  [IMAGE] Free Apartment Search   [IMAGE] Time to refinance? Click here!

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	UNSUBSCRIBE 	MORE NEWSLETTERS 	FEEDBACK 	HELP 	[IMAGE]
					To unsubscribe, reply to this email with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject line.

[IMAGE]

  	 go to MSN Home  More Useful Everyday MSN Home  | My MSN  | Hotmail  | Search  | Shopping  | Money  | People & Chat
	?2001 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use   Advertise   TRUSTe Approved Privacy Statement   GetNetWise


After some preliminary analysis, it does not look like our big counterparties i.e. Dynegy, Rliant, Duke, El Paso etc., are closing down their positions. On the contrary their net positions seem to be rising. This is only for NYMEX related financial instruments, I haven't looked at phys or power yet.

Just thought you would like to know.


Please see the updated Attorney Information List.

Martha Keesler
Senior Administrative Assistant
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, EB 3829
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 345-2423
(713) 646-3491 (Fax)


fyi


Please join John Lavorato for a meeting regarding Gas Traders in ECS 06980 (the large conference room) tomorrow, January 29 at 10:00 am.

Let me know if you have questions.

Kim
x30681


Got a voicemail from Rob Walls.  They are (have been) looking into it.


Good morning, Liz -

I left a message at your home this morning that your Dad would like to speak
with you when you have a chance to call.

Rosie

p.s. - P. L. and I did early voting the first Saturday available!!  It was
such a good feeling as Tuesdays are tough with trying to get to the office
and leave in time to vote!!

Elizabeth Lay <lizard_ar@yahoo.com> on 11/06/2000 09:13:26 AM
To: ealvittor@yahoo.com
cc:
Subject: Get out the Vote

Dear Friends and Family,
We are down to the wire and the race couldn't be
closer. Every vote counts, even those of you in Texas.
Please, remember to vote and go early, polls open at
7am across the country and close at 7pm but don't put
it off until 7pm as there could be lines and the
supervisors are not required to keep the polls open
after 7pm for those in line.
Remind your friends and family to vote and if someone
needs transportation to the polls, give them a ride or
call your local Victory 2000 office (Republicans) or
your local Democratic campaign office, they will have
people available to transport people to the polls.
Keep an eye out while you are at the polls for
electoral fraud and report any suspicious activity
including inappropriate campaigning to the poll
watchers at the polls. The Democrats and the
Republicans will have representatives at most of the
polls, let them know if there is suspicious activity.
Finally, if you have time, call your local offices and
offer your time to make phone calls to encourage
people to get out and vote, pass out leaflets, or to
be available to help prevent of voter fraud.

Finally, enjoy the evening and watch the results come
in. There are election watch parties everywhere!!!

Just one more day (and no more mass political e-mail's
from me and everyone else)!
Take care and VOTE!
Liz

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one Place.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/


When: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 10:00 AM-10:30 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: Stacey's desk

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


did they look good or lucky to win?  how is roy playing?


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2000 01:58
PM ---------------------------

James T Javins@EES
01/04/2000 12:33 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CES acquisitions

Happy New Year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just a note to see if you had any updates on the ENA acquisition of Columbia
Energy's third party business.

Let me know.

Thanks!

Jim


Deal #231757
Purchase

The deal in sitara indicates that the price for East Texas Gas Systems is
HSC, Index -$.085.
Per the contract, the redelivery  at ETGS Carthage Hub Tailgate should be
priced at  HSC Index -$.0825.
Are these the same points and is the price correct?

Thanks
katherine


The ETS Mechanical Services, Compression Services and ETS Mechanical
Integrity groups have been renamed ETS Power Services to better describe the
focus of our business.

ETS Power Services is responsible for data gathering and predictive
maintenance analysis, coordination of scheduled & unscheduled maintenance,
outage planning, overhaul management & inspection. We also supply the
day-to-day mechanical expertise for over 700 reciprocating engines, gas
turbines and compressors throughout the ETS system.  The name ETS Power
Services helps to better define our role and the expansion of our business to
support other Enron entities, as well as companies outside Enron in the power
and natural gas industries.

Please feel free to contact me at 713-646-7624 should you have any questions,
or if the ETS Power Services group can help support your engine, gas turbine
or compressor maintenance needs.

John R. Keller
Vice President
ETS Planning & Power Services


I'm concerned about the 2nd bullet.  We've been taking the position that we don't want this "payment of PX credit" issue in this proceeding -- the "free-for-all" proceeding. Have we changed our position?  If not, I am concerned that Edison will either state directly or give the impression that it's part of the Barnett proceeding.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mellencamp, Lisa
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 11:09 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Williams, Robert C.; 'mday@gmssr.com'; 'jbennet@gmssr.com'
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; Mara, Susan
Subject:	RE: Call Regarding Prehearing Conference on Our Negative CTC complaint

ok

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 1:06 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Williams, Robert C.; 'mday@gmssr.com'; Mellencamp, Lisa; 'jbennet@gmssr.com'
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; Mara, Susan
Subject:	RE: Call Regarding Prehearing Conference on Our Negative CTC complaint

OK.  Haven't heard back from Bob, but we may be able to avoid the call.  Mike Day got in touch with Edison's attorney this morning and here's the end result.

Edison has agreed to tell the judge on the 7th that, with respect to the complaints we've filed, they agree to take them off calendar until and unless parties ask to put them back on calendar.
Edison will  take the view that the proceedings underway at the commission (and presumably attempts to "settle" with parties) will resolve the issues in the complaint.
The assumption from out end is that the status quo remains intact.  That is, we will continue to pay the Commission, not Edison, for T&D charges during the "time out" on our complaints.
Mike and Jeanne will make sure that this critical piece, i.e., that we continue to place payments in escrow, will remain intact as part of the "time out."  If it turns out there are any doubts about this aspect, we'll likely need regroup and reconsider our options.

If anyone has any questions or concerns please speak up, and/or if folks would still like to have a very brief call to discuss, we can do that and ensure that Bob is kept in the loop and can weigh in when he returns.

Comments/thoughts?

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 11:30 AM
To:	Williams, Robert C.; 'mday@gmssr.com'; Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject:	Call Regarding Prehearing Conference on Our Negative CTC complaint

Bob's secretary called to tell me that Bob's at a doctor's appt and will be back in the office around noon Houston time.  We'll shoot for around noon CST to have the call.  I'll conference folks in from my phone.

Best,
Jeff


Dear Ms Beck
Thank you for taking your time to interview me for the Enron MBA Excellence Scholarship today.  Through our conversation, I have learnt more about your firm and experienced firsthand how its corporate values are embodied in you and your colleagues.  Given a chance, I would also love to hear more about your area of work.  It sounds to me like a field that I am very interested in.  I am currently taking a second-year class on Derivatives and Risk Management.
I am still in the process of locating a summer job and would really appreciate it if you could give me some feedback on my interview performance.  It would be very helpful to me.
It was a pleasure meeting you and I hope you enjoyed your brief visit back to UT.
Warm regards
Soo Pang Tang


Larry:

I'm not sure if you are the keeper of the Contact List, but since I received
it from you I thought I should point out a couple of errors in the info.
relative to me:

 my fax number is 713-646-3490
 my email address is mtaylo1@ect.enron.com

Thanks

Mark

Lawrence Lawyer
05/03/99 01:17 PM
To: Luitgard Fischer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marty Malinow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, rbaird@velaw.comwilliamk@riskinc.com, Paulv@riskinc.com,
augusteb@riskinc.com, mbutch@skadden.com
cc:
Subject: Project Tornado Contact List

Attached please find a copy of the contact list.

Regards,

-Larry-


While you guys were all busy worrying over the California energy crisis, I
slipped down to Mexico to conduct an investigation of how our neighbors even
further to the south are faring. Do they still have lights? Is the AC shot?
Can they even make a blended margarita?

Seriously, though, I will be out of the office on Friday, Dec. 22, and again
from Wednesday, Dec. 27 to Monday, Jan. 2. I realize this is late notice; I
did let Richter know awhile ago, but I probably should have spread the word a
little further. I am truly sorry.

At any rate (below the price cap of course), while I am gone I would be so
appreciative if one of you could run the Dow Jones report in the morning and
the EOL report in the evening. Dow Jones will only need to be taken care of
from Wed. through Fri. of next week. I will call on those days, and I can
easily explain the procedure over the phone to those of you who don't know
it. If I call and you're ridiculously busy, just hang up on me. I'll call
back later.

The EOL report we have come to know and love is actually being fixed right
now. I will talk with Nicolay Kraltchev, the Houston IT guy in charge of
fixing it, on Friday, Dec. 22. It should be up and running again by Friday
afternoon. Again, I'll call to check in and make sure this works, or explain
how to use it.

I'll be in the office on Monday, Dec. 25, just briefly to make sure it hasn't
exploded in my absence, but then I'll be off to the land where tequila is
better for you than water. Sounds terrible. Please don't hesitate to call if
you have any questions, or problems, of the work sort, of course.

Kate
503.819.2181


This is exactly what I needed.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Boyt, Eric
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 8:34 AM
To: Taylor, Sarah
Cc: Weldon, V Charles
Subject: Re: Highland

Hope this helps.....The results box is our model with last years pricing.

Eric

From: Sarah Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/19/2001 07:14 AM
To: Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Highland

Eric,

I am preparing my presentation for Jean and John and I have one quick
question.  You indicated the average gas price was $4.94.  Yesterday you also
mentioned how that valuation would have changed if it would have been
calculated last April.  Do you know what the average price would have been if
calculated last April?  I think this would help put things in perspective.

Thanks
Sarah


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT on 12/15/99 08:41
AM ---------------------------

Bob Withers <rww@KCSEnergy.com> on 12/15/99 08:28:08 AM
To: Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stretch Brennan <djb@KCSEnergy.com>, Kevin McLarney <kmm@KCSEnergy.com>,
"'Taylor Vance (E-mail)'" <vtaylor2@enron.com>
Subject: 2nd rev Dec. 1999 Josey Ranch nom

  Here's REVISED December 1999 (effective 12/15/99 ) setup for
Josey: (using 1.081 Btu/Mcf)
* Gas deliveries into HPL
     9,300 MMBtu/d for KRI            (net reduction of
3,000 MMBtu/d)
      9,300 MMBtu/d into HPL

Bob Withers <*))>><
KCS Energy, 5555 San Felipe, Suite 1200
Houston, TX  77056
voice mail/page 713-964-9434


<<12_19_01 control rod adjustment.doc>>

Hope you all have a happy and healthy holiday season.  Take Care -

Bobbi J. Kilburn
Treasury & Risk Administrator
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
(802) 258-4120
(802) 258-2101
Bobbi.Kilburn@vynpc.com

 - 12_19_01 control rod adjustment.doc


(See attached file: hpl0602.xls)

 - hpl0602.xls


Nothing from Ben yet.  If I don't hear from him in the next couple of hours,
then I think we should be ready with an extension letter, giving them a
couple of days extra for free.  Ben indicated to  me last week that he would
give them some time once they asked.

MK called with questions on the assignment - nothing serious.

Kay


Please find attached the risk pool report as of 10/15/01.

Maribel M Monterrey
Office: (713) 853-9048
Fax: (713) 853-9476
Maribel.Monterrey@enron.com


Dear Ken,

I just want to let you know that I as an employee, really appreciate all what you have done to try and get Enron back on the road again. It must be very painful for you to see a company go down especially since you have been there right from its inception.

I just wanted to ask you if it would be possible for you to give me about 10 minutes of your time sometime this week or probably next week. I would be really happy if I could meet you.

Thank you.

Yours Sincerely,

Vridhay


CITY OF VERNON BECOMES FIRST MUNICIPAL TO SEEK TO JOIN CA-ISO

09/20/2000
Foster Electric Report
Page 4
(c) Copyright 2000, Foster Associates, Inc.
An August 30 petition (EL00-105) to FERC made the city of Vernon, California,
the first muni to seek participating transmission owner (PTO) status in the
California Independent System Operator Corp. (CA-ISO). If Vernon's request is
granted, the city would turn over control of certain transmission
entitlements to the CA-ISO and be reimbursed based upon its transmission
revenue requirement (TRR).
Noting the novelty of the petition and the possible precedential effects of
FERC's ruling, Vernon asked FERC to act by October 31, 2000 so that it can
assume PTO status by the first of next year under the CA-ISO's procedures. If
the Commission determines that it needs additional information, the city
asked FERC to allow its TRR to go into effect subject to changes imposed by a
final FERC ruling.
"It is clearly in the public interest that the CA-ISO and its customers on
January 1, 2001, begin receiving the use of Vernon's transmission
entitlements, while Vernon is able to receive all of the benefits of full
participation in the CA-ISO as a PTO, which it has long sought to do." In
June, Vernon submitted a "notice of intent" to seek PTO status.
The CA-ISO has long sought to modify its rules to make participation by
California's public power transmission owners more attractive. After years of
lengthy discussions, the CA-ISO on 3/31/00 proposed Amendment No. 27
(ER00-2019) to its tariff to accomplish this, basically modifying the way its
transmission access charge would be calculated (see REPORT No.188, pg.8).
While FERC on May 31 accepted several aspects of the proposal, it rejected
several others, including one spelling out how new PTOs should use cost-shift
benefits to lower or "buy down" their transmission revenue requirements (see
REPORT No.193, pg.3). In response to that order, the CA-ISO on August 3 filed
Appendix F to its tariff, under which a potential PTO can ask either FERC or
the CA-ISO to approve its TRR.
Under California law, Vernon's utility rates were set by its city council and
are final. The May 31 order, however, said that the question of who has the
authority to review the TRR of a public power utility seeking PTO status "is
a complex and evolving question." While not trying to broaden its authority,
FERC nevertheless must ensure that the costs being passed through by the
CA-ISO to its customers are just and reasonable, according to FERC. As a
result and at the behest of the CA-ISO, Vernon asked FERC to approve its TRR,
which it presented "in a form designed to meet the Commission's ratemaking
criteria."
If Vernon's petition is approved, it will begin to take transmission service
over facilities "on which it has entitlements under the CA-ISO rate schedules
just as does any other CA-ISO customer," the petition stated. "Vernon's TRR
is comparable to what it charges itself for those entitlements."
Vernon is unlike most other potential public power participants in the CA-ISO
in that the city's power facilities were not financed with tax-exempt debt or
bonds. Thus, Vernon does not have to worry about losing tax-exempt status
when it turns over control of its transmission facilities to the CA-ISO and
begins to participate in competitive markets.


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 09/10/2000 07:32
PM ---------------------------

Jeremy Meier <jermeier@earthlink.net> on 09/08/2000 09:10:55 PM
To: jdasovic@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Draft tariff revisions

Jeff:

Attached please find the revised tariff(s) to be filed once we get the
final order - we are going to add to it and send you more on Monday.

Jeremy
B & C

 - enron CaliforniaTariffSept.doc


Sounds good.  I'm available just about any day over the next few weeks.

DG

SSCHROED@us.ca-indosuez.com on 01/18/2001 04:35:19 PM
To: dgiron@enron.com, randy.g.kruger.jr@arthuranderson.com,
mikeshaw@andrews-kurth.com
cc:
Subject:

How about getting together for lunch in the next couple of weeks?


FYI.  Mitsubishi is asking for a conference with our "senior management" to
discuss the non-payment of freight and demurrage.  Eric's response is
self-explanatory.  Deborah,please print out and file.

    Britt
----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 08/07/2000 08:02 AM -----

	Eric Tan@ECT
	08/06/2000 11:39 PM

		 To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 cc: "Clifford Bennett" <minton@singnet.com.sg>, Richard
Slovenski/SIN/ECT@ECT, Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT, Victor
Santos/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT, Carol
Chew/SIN/ECT@ECT, ngregson@wfw.com, Michael J Gasper/HOU/ECT@ECT, John H
Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Philips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Graham Cane/LON/ECT@ECT,
Wietze Dingeldein/LON/ECT@ECT, Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
david.best@clyde.co.uk, Paul Henking/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Pacific Virgo

Your info -  I have verbally told owners (via shipbrokers) that we will be
responding today.  Therefore, they may want to review their their plans to
come to Singapore.

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Tan/SIN/ECT on 07/08/2000 12:37
---------------------------

Admin@CMX
05/08/2000 11:47
To: Eric Tan/SIN/ECT, Singapore CMX/SIN/ECT
cc:
Subject: Incoming Tlx:[05AUG 1142 RS#] {REF: TC583623} {RE: M/T PACIFIC VIRGO
/ ENRON- CP 13/JUN/2000} {AUG/04(1900JST),2000 REF:0804-01}

0667 50668    11:43-05 REC    enron spore

05AUG 1142 RS#
EGLSIN RS37130

SSYSIN RS26746

DATE: 05/08/2000 11:45:20
REF : TC583623

TO: ENRON SPORE
ATTN: ERIC TAN

FM: SIMPSON SPENCE AND YOUNG SINGAPORE

RE : M/T PACIFIC VIRGO / ENRON - CP 13/JUN/2000

PLS KINDLY PASS FLWG MSG TO CHRTS
QTE

PLEASE PASS THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE TO THE CHTRS/ENRON.

QTE:
ATTN:MR.ERIC TAN -DIRECTOR,OPERATIONS
     ENRON CAPITAL   TRADE RESOURCES SINGAPORE PTE LTD.

AUG/04(1900JST),2000   REF:0804-01

IT IS OUR GREAT REGRET THAT WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY REPLY FOR YOUR
UNREASONABLE WITHHOLDING OF THE FREIGHT USUSD501,294.50 ON MT PACIFIC
VIRGO.

WE,MITSUBISHI CORPORATION,ARE PLANNING TO SEND THE MISSION TO YOUR
OFFICE.

YOU ARE REQUESTED TO ARRANGE A MEETING WITH YOUR SENIOR MANAGEMENT
ON AUGUST/08,2000.

THANKS AND REGARDS

MITSUBISHI CORPORATION
UNQTE:

REGARDS.
M.ISHIBASHI / NF-C
MITSUBISHI CORPORATION TOKYO

UNQTE

PLS URGENTLY ASK CHRTS TO MAKE A REPLY ON ABV.

B.RGDS
SSY SPORE

NNNN
SSYSIN RS26746#
EGLSIN RS37130

VVVV
LOCAL TELEX FROM RS26711


Attached for your review are copies of the settlement documents that were
filed today in the Gas Industry Restructuring/Natural Gas Strategy
proceeding, including the Motion for Approval of the Comprehensive Settlement
that is supported by thirty signatories to the Comprehensive Settlement, the
Comprehensive Settlement document itself, and the various appendices to the
settlement.? Because a number of the declarations and signature pages are not
yet available electronically, they have not been included with this note.?
Hard copies of the Comprehensive Settlement, including all declarations and
signature pages, are being shipped tonight via US mail to all parties on the
service list.? Additional printed copies should be available within the next
day or so and I will make them available to all of you - just let me know how
many copies you need.

I would like to thank all of the parties who participated in this settlement
process.? You have all devoted considerable time, resources and spirit in the
preparation of this document - and it shows.? We now have a settlement before
the Commission that includes ratepayer advocates, commercial and industrial
customers, electric generators, marketers, shippers, independent storage
providers,? gas suppliers,? producers, utilities, aggregators, pipeline
companies, wholesale customers, municipalities, and retail mass marketers,
among others.?

While we should be proud of our accomplishment, we now must turn to the task
of getting our testimony ready by May 5 deadline.? Assignments have already
been made and I will schedule a conference call later this week to discuss
related details.? So much for resting on our laurels.? Once again, thank you
all for an outstanding accomplishment.

 <<ld2d-#69366-1.DOC>>  <<ld2d-#69345-1.DOC>> ?  <<ld2d-#69397-1.DOC>>
<<ld2d-#69396-1.DOC>>  <<ld2d-#69377-1.XLS>>  <<ld2d-#69381-1.DOC>>
<<ld2d-#69366-1.DOC>>  <<ld2d-#69336-1.XLS>>  <<Primary Rights 4-12 .doc>>
<<ld2d-#69334-1.DOC>>  <<ld2d-#69345-1.DOC>>

 - ld2d-#69366-1.DOC
 - ld2d-#69345-1.DOC
 - ld2d-#69397-1.DOC
 - ld2d-#69396-1.DOC
 - ld2d-#69377-1.XLS
 - ld2d-#69381-1.DOC
 - ld2d-#69366-1.DOC
 - ld2d-#69336-1.XLS
 - Primary Rights 4-12 .doc
 - ld2d-#69334-1.DOC
 - ld2d-#69345-1.DOC


In Bruce McMills absence, I am sending the following correction for Eastrans
Nominations.  Bruce has confirmed the correction with Darren Farmer.

Correction for 4/5/2000 nomination:

Deliveries:

75,000 MMBtu into Eastrans

Redeliveries:

20,000 into PG&E
7,800 from Fuels Cotton Valley into HPL
12,200 into HPL's Carwheel at Carthage
20,000 into Mobil Beaumont at HSC - $.0375
15,000 into Mobil Beaumont at HSC - $.055


We probably need some view from Richard Sanders as well.  I agree with Dave
that this is a little bit of I told you so ... but, I'm not sure (as long as
legal o.k.'s) that there's much risk of being ignored (anymore than we are
currently being ignored) and it may actually restore some credibility on the
issue of price gouging.

Susan J Mara@ENRON
04/25/2001 07:27 AM
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: LT Contracts:  A History of Inaction by the CPUC

Looks like Parquet is on-board.  Karen, Mark -- What are your thoughts on
Dave's qquestions?

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 04/25/2001 07:24 AM -----

	David Parquet@ECT
	04/24/2001 05:24 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: LT Contracts:  A History of Inaction by the CPUC

Can we get any traction in supporting this?  The premise is obviously
preaching to the choir, and we (as I am sure others do as well) have a string
of proposals starting with SDGEs in May or June that, if we melded their
timing and their prices into the attached timeline would be very damaging to
thinking people.  However, are people really thinking, or has Davis and the
reporters tainted the waters too badly?  What would be the result that we
would like to get from such an exposee?  Do we really think that we could get
some sympathy for returning to a market based structure?  Or, would we be
like the irritating kid who keeps saying "I told you so", so it does not
matter if he was right or not?  Are there any legal issues in revealing the
prices?  Does doing this through IEP help?  (Note that the addition of prices
could not be done, I do not think,  without naming companies, so we would be
there, partially revealed.)

My vote:  if it does not hurt us (competitively, PR, etc.), if it is legal,
and especially if it can help make even a small amout of progress towards a
market based structure, I would do it.  Of course, we could not go anymore to
restaurants near the CPUC......

I am out of town for the rest of the week, so I will leave the decision to
you guys.  Whatever you decide, is OK.

PS - At the very least, we should feed our own proposals and their prices
into this timeline.  Privately, we could show it to various parties on a case
by case basis to advance our cause.  Just think about it...  what if SDGE had
accepted our (and others) May/June proposals for 5.5 cents.....?)

----- Forwarded by David Parquet/SF/ECT on 04/24/2001 04:59 PM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	04/24/2001 12:56 PM

		 To: "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)"
<Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Tom Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Tom
Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'"
<alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<trusso@mcnallytemple.com>, <sadlersa@earthlink.net>, <mstultz@epsa.org>,
<rtemple@mcnallytemple.com>, <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>,
<megan.beiser@edelman.com>, <deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com>, <lchurch@epsa.org>,
Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>,
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, <tmcmorrow@manatt.com>,
<Suzy.L.Rodriguez@dynegy.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: LT Contracts:  A History of Inaction by the CPUC

Attached is a history of inaction by the CPUC in regards to long-term
contracts. We are graphically portraying this as a timeline, incorporating
the quotes.

We would like to also incorporate any public long-term contract offers IEP
members made that utilities were not able to enter into because of the CPUC.
?This will once again help reinforce that IEP members are part of the
solution. ?

Please forward this information, or any other comments, to me or Katie by 8am
PST, Thursday April 26.

Please call if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Jean

--
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates, Inc.
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)

 - Long Term Contract Timeline


Michael, here is the claim memo to Vneshtopprom. I shall send this to the
in-house translator in Moscow, but nothing will go to Vneshtopprom until
everyone is happy with the draft. The Appendices are as per the third report
save for the last 2 which I will circulate separately. The password is pink.

Robert


I liked your flag.  I forwarded to a bunch of people and we all have it on our computers here.

That calendar was enough to put me on a diet.  Yuck.

You'll have to forward that home for dad to see.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peters, Carmen [mailto:carmen.peters@nissan-usa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:54 AM
To: Staab, Theresa
Subject: RE: KrispyKremeCalendar2001

Thanks, that's bad, but funny.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Staab, Theresa [SMTP:Theresa.Staab@enron.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:54 AM
> To:	Serrano, Walt; Sitter, Scott; Schlecht, Dinah; Fresquez, Rick;
> jbuffing@westerngas.com; tdelelli@westerngas.com; Mendel, Shelly; Adams,
> Jacqueline P.; sscott5@enron.com; Peters, Carmen
> Subject:	FW: KrispyKremeCalendar2001
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Garcia, Felicia (Denver) [mailto:FeliciaGarcia@aec.ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:50 AM
> To: Felling, Amy; 'mwhitt@enron.com'; 'tstaab@enron.com'; Harrison,
> Tyrell
> Subject: FW: KrispyKremeCalendar2001
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cavalli, Steve (Denver)
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:17 AM
> To: Tatman, Sue (Denver); Garcia, Felicia (Denver); Morss, Ruth
> Ann(Denver); Butler, Brandy (Denver); Big Red (E-mail); Cheryl and Chuck
> (E-mail); Mahoney (E-mail); Jim Milne (E-mail); Rafa (E-mail)
> Subject: FW: KrispyKremeCalendar2001
>
>
> Now this is what I'm talking about.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conn, Jeff (Denver)
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:06 AM
> To: Hewett, Thomas A (Denver); Ingraham, Stephen (Denver); Cavalli,
> Steve (Denver); Mason, Mark (Denver); Burden, Kevin (Denver)
> Subject: FW: KrispyKremeCalendar2001
>
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
> and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
> are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
> its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
> be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise. Thank you.
> ********************************************************************** <<
> File: KrispyKremeCalendar2001.jpg >>


Mark, I mentioned this problem several weeks ago.  Did you ever respond to
Willie's most recent inquiry?  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/10/99 09:06
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Willie Harrell                           05/07/99 05:44 PM

To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol
St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D
Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark D Thorne/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Confirmation Attachments

To  maintain  a  more  accurate  record  of  deal  statuses,  I  have  been
instructed  by  my  manager,  Jeff Sorenson  to
  have  the  Confirm  Center  to  execute  Ominibus  confirmations  returned
to  us  without  the  attachments, (mainly  the
  Annex  A).  These  deals  have  all  been  matched-up  and  signed
satisfactorily  by  the  counterparties,  except  that
  the  attachments  were  not  returned  with  the  executed  confirmations.
Legal  will  continue  to    address  this  issue
  until  resolved,  when  time  permits,  for  my  request  for  a  letter
of  approval  of  a  new  policy  making  the  return  of
  most  common  attachments  unnecessary.  However,  unless  otherwise
instructed ,  we    will    be    executing    these
  confirms  without  the  attachments  effective  immediately  5/9/99.

  PS:  I  will  be  out  on  Monday  and  Friday,  5/10/99  and  5/14/99;
please  contact  Mary  Gosnell  @  3-1727  or
           Jefferson D Sorenson  @  3-5294   with  any   questions  or
comments.  Thanks!

  Willie  Harrell  (3-9226)


Dzien dobry,

Mam nadzieje, ze nic sie nie zmienilo i jestesmy umowieni na dziesiejszy
lunch. Proponuje sie spotkac o godzinie 12.00 na parterze obok biurka
"security ladies" (bo wiem gdzie to jest). Ubrany jestem w czarne spodnie,
bezowe buty i szara bluze. Nie jestem pewien czy bede mogl przeczytac
potwierdzenie, bo od 10 do 11.45 przeprowadzam szkolenie.

Juliusz


Deal 514157 what is the status.  Is Mike going to change cp name to Merrill
Lynch or keep it as Pacificorp?

Evelyn

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/05/2001 04:34 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 2-5-01 checkout

513386 - changed to APB.

514157 - Mike is checking with broker on this.

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/05/2001 01:53 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 2-5-01 checkout

Jeff Richter
deal 513386
Prebon does not recognize this deal

 Mike Swerzbin
deal 514157
Prebon shows cp as Merrill Lynch not Pacificorp.


Attached is the revised agenda for your meeting in August.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Thanks.

Dorie Hitchcock
Phone:  281.370.0695
Fax:      281.370.0385
Cell:      713.594.7093
 - 01lavaugcolagenda.xls


no, no, no.  thank YOU!

	Michelle Hicks@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/26/2000 03:10 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting

Cool.  See you tomorrow.  We have conference room EB 4598A at 12:00 noon.
Thanks, Michelle

	Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	10/26/00 02:21 PM

		 To: Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting

12 it is.  i'll need to leave at 1 pm to catch my plane.  we should be able
to get things done in an hour.

Best,
Jeff

	Michelle Hicks@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/26/2000 02:02 PM

		 To: Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting

----- Forwarded by Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications on 10/26/00 02:07 PM
-----

	JoAnne Garner
	10/26/00 01:42 PM

		 To: Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Melissa Loyd/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting

I have reserved 4598A for you guys tomorrow from 12 - 2.  Thanks.

Joanne Garner
713 853 3237


I'm the original owner. I got it shortly after I came to this department. It's a Compaq Armada M700.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	LaGesse, Denise
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:04 AM
To:	Rapp, Bill
Cc:	Sellers, Emily
Subject:	FW: Laptop accessories

Bill,
Are you the original owner of that laptop or is it a redeployed sysem?  Also, what model?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wendt, Richard
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:40 AM
To:	LaGesse, Denise
Subject:	RE: Laptop accessories

Not knowing exactly what model Compaq laptop Bill has makes this an educated guess on my part.  First of all, all new laptops came with both CD and floppy drives so if he is the orginal owner have him check in the bag.  If it was a redeployed system he may not have received all the pieces.  With that said, an internal floppy drive will run about $75 for the Compaq M700 laptop. Other models may vary in price a bit but probably not by much.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	LaGesse, Denise
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:33 PM
To:	Wendt, Richard
Subject:	FW: Laptop accessories

I'm sending this to you in Karon's absence . . .

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	LaGesse, Denise
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:31 PM
To:	O'Gorman, Karon
Cc:	Rapp, Bill; Sellers, Emily
Subject:	Laptop accessories

Bill Rapp's laptop (Compaq) is not equipped with the device that allows a 3.5" diskette to be loaded.  He can run CDs, but not diskettes.  What do we need to order and how much will it cost?  Thanks.

Denise LaGesse
Enron Transportation Services
1400 Smith Street (77002-7361)
P.O. Box 1188
Houston, Texas 77251-1188
denise.lagesse@enron.com
ph 713-853-6704
cell 713-822-7736
fax 713-853-5425


Rich and Dave, attached are my suggested revisions to Mike McLeod's draft of
an amendment to the original electric service agreement.  Dave, I'll bring
you a copy of that agreement.  Rich, if Mike did not send you one, let me
know and I will fax it to you.

In my revisions, I've attempted to reflect the least cost billing you
described to me, using terminology I read in the tariff.  Please let me know
if it looks alright to you.  I'm available to discuss this whenever you are,
then I will make sending this to Mike top priority.  My sincerest apologies
for the delay; there has been more chaos around here than I am accustomed to
handling, and I appreciate your patience.

Susan
x30596


Ed:
Thanks for your help.  Since I am a lawyer, it would help to have someone on
your legal staff on the call.  Let me know if that is possible.  Thanks.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	"Ed Fernandez" <EFernandez@teainc.org>
	06/08/2001 07:24 AM

		 To: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
		 cc: Edward.Sacks@enron.com, EFernandez@teainc.org,
Rudwell.Johnson@enron.com, "Rene S Dumstorf" <RDumstorf@teainc.org>
		 Subject: Re: Status

Carol,

At this point, I get with our Rene Dumstorf (Chief Credit Officer,
904.356.3900, ext. 3036) when she arrives on Monday to arrange a conference
call.

Ed Fernandez
Contract/Credit Analyst
The Energy Authority, Inc.
76 South Laura St., Ste. 1500
Jacksonville, Florida  32202
T 904.360.1354
F  904.665.0354
efernandez@TEAINC.org

                    Carol.St.Clair
                    @enron.com            To:     EFernandez@teainc.org
                                          cc:     Rudwell.Johnson@enron.com,
Edward.Sacks@enron.com
                    06/07/2001            Subject:     Status
                    05:36 PM

Ed:
I spoke with our credit people today.  We would like to arrange a call to
discuss our concerns about Section 5 of the Guaranty with me, our credit
people, your counsel and your credit person or someone that can make a
decision if we propose a change to the Guaranty.  Can you let me know who
these people are (and their phone numbers) so that we can arrange a call?
We understand fully your need for the Section 5 language, but we would like
to explore with your people whether your concerns can be addressed in a
different manner.  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


You got it. I'll leave another one COB.  Hope you're well.

Best,
Jeff

	Richard Shapiro@EES
	05/08/2001 09:36 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Voicemail

Thanks for the updates! Keep them coming.


There were two overlays done in GCP this afternoon.  The summary is on top,
for details, see the bottom tab, Mar. 2001.

Shortname changes will be made Fri, 04/06/01.

Records will be inactivated on Mon, 04/02/01, in the afternoon.

Have a great weekend!

Cheryl x33103


Please add Tricia Spence to this email.  She will be working with me on the
CGAS volumes.

12/18/2000 09:30 AM
Jeffrey Porter@EES
Jeffrey Porter@EES
Jeffrey Porter@EES
12/18/2000 09:30 AM
12/18/2000 09:30 AM
To: ENA COH Nominations
cc:
Subject: 12/17 Actuals


The documents give us a choice between paying the Remaining Purchase Amount Refund Amount ($5.099 million) to the LLC or paying the GE Accelerated Payment ($?) to GE.  As you know cash is extremely tight at the moment - have we done all we can to negotiate a lower payoff amount with GE?  The Remaining Purchase Amount Refund Amount allows us to deduct interest, a benefit of ~2.24%.  Can GE give us any discount in excess of 2.24%?  If so, we should opt for the GE Accelerated Payment.  We can discuss this further tomorrow.
-Catherine
x3-9943

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jacoby, Ben
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:58 PM
To:	Mann, Kay; Booth, Chris; Clark, Catherine
Subject:	Northwestern

Mike Young from NW called to advise me that they received GE's consent. NW plans to send us notice of this tomorrow. I believe this will trigger our obligation to pay NW the balance of payments we hold, discounted at 7.5 % p.a. I believe this means that we will need to pay NW $5.1 million of the $5.2 million we have been prepaid.

Let's talk about this in the AM.


Hey sugar, how are you doing?  I feel pretty good today.  I guess because of the prunees last nite.  I love and miss you very much.  I just wanted to say hi and I loved you.

Have a wonderful day and I will talk to you later.

The Pigs

PS  Try to remind me to take my breakfast foods to work.  Thanks


I will call you in the am.  I am free until 11:30 NYT. What works for you?
Do you want a business person like Scott Talento on the line with us?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [SMTP:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 2:44 PM
> To: schernick@bear.com
> Subject: Re: enhanced stock loan
>
>
> Sharon:
>
> I'm on my way out of the office for an appointment but will be back around
> 4 or 4:30 Houston time.  I'd like a quick chat this evening or tomorrow
> morning (before 11 am Houston, if possible).  I understand that the
> dynamics of this deal were discussed by Russ and Jeff Kinneman/Sheila
> Glover.  The Enron party is Enron North America Corp. ("ENA", formerly
> named "ECT") and the $25million Enron Corp. guaranty is for the purpose of
> securing payment of the 20%plus margin requirement for  illiquid
> securities
> held by ENA in its Bear account ("stock loan account").  I'm not sure if
> other agreements are necessary and I was hoping that we could discuss.
>
> Feel free to email or call.  Thanks for your help.
>
> Sara Shackleton
> Enron North America Corp.
> 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
> Houston, Texas  77002
> 713-853-5620 (phone)
> 713-646-3490 (fax)
> sara.shackleton@enron.com
>
>
>
>
>                     "Chernick,
>
>                     Sharon               To:
> "'sara.shackleton@enron.com'" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
>                     Confidential         cc:     "Talento, Scott
> (Exchange)" <STALENTO@bear.com>, "Miron, Russel
>                     Memo-Counsel         (Exchange)" <rmiron@bear.com>
>
>                     (Exchange)"          Subject:     enhanced stock loan
>
>                     <schernick@be
>
>                     ar.com>
>
>
>
>                     02/07/2001
>
>                     01:17 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sara:
>
> I have made some inquiry and verified that the Bear Stearns Stock Loan
> enhanced leveraged product is indeed what is under consideration.
>
> As promised, I have a brief step-by-step  explanation of such a stock loan
> transaction, which is appended to this message.  There are actually two
> possible scenarios: one where cash collateral is used for the stock loan,
> the other where actual securities are used as collateral.  We understand
> that, at least initially, you will be using bonds as collateral.
>
> The Stock Loan Agreement is used in connection with our current form of
> Institutional Account Agreement which ECT may not have signed.  I
> therefore
> also append that agreement to this message.
>
> I expect you waill wnat to review these attachments before we speak again.
> Again, as a reminder, I will be on vacation from Friday the 16th through
> the
> following week.  If you would like to speak before hand, or if you have
> any
> questions regarding any of the documents, please let me know.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sharon
>
>  <<Enhanced Stock Loan-explained.doc>>
>
>  <<IAA_ 9-8-00rev_clean.doc>>
>
> (See attached file: Enhanced Stock Loan-explained.doc)
> (See attached file: IAA_ 9-8-00rev_clean.doc)
> ***********************************************************************
> Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation,
> offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer
> account or account activity contained in this communication.
> ***********************************************************************
>
>  << File: Enhanced Stock Loan-explained.doc >>  << File: IAA_
> 9-8-00rev_clean.doc >>

***********************************************************************
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation,
offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer
account or account activity contained in this communication.
***********************************************************************


Your request to sell shares was received and will be processed according
to the terms of the Plan.  Thank you for using EquiServe.com.


FYI.  May be some useful data for folks.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/26/2001 03:27 PM -----

	Ann.Cohn@sce.com
	07/26/2001 02:00 PM

		 To: brbarkovich@earthlink.net, dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com,
drothrock@cmta.net, Gary.Schoonyan@sce.com, isenberg@hmot.com,
jdasovic@enron.com, kmccrea@sablaw.com, vjw@cleanpower.org, ek@a-klaw.com,
John.Fielder@sce.com, dhunter@s-k-w.com, wbooth@booth-law.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Info re customer accounts given to Assembly staff

For your information, here is the information given to the Assembly staff.

(See attached file: Summary Table.doc)
 - Summary Table.doc


Jim-
	We plan to file with FERC Q1 2002 for the pipe certificate.  Doug Cebryk and Larry Campbell plan to fly the proposed ROW from Flagstaff, AZ to Phoenix, AZ on 9/11.  We plan to loop the existing San Juan lateral and mainline segments as far west as Flagstaff.  Attached is a copy of the open season (which closed Thurs 8/30).  Please don't hesitate to call with any questions.

Kevin Hyatt
ETS Asset Development
713-853-5559

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Mccartney [mailto:jw1000mac@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 3:09 PM
To: Soldano, Louis; Larry Ruzow (E-mail); Jim McCartney (E-mail 2);
McGee, Johnny; Gleffe, Larry
Cc: Fossum, Drew; Hyatt, Kevin
Subject: Re: Navajo ROW - Sun Devil

louie, thanks for the info. do we have a certificate
yet? if so would you please send or have someone send
a copy of the text and any maps showing location on
the nn reservation? did we have any interventions from
the nn utility whatever or the bia--any relevant
interventions? if we haven't filed, i continue to
think that we should put some maps or language in the
application that will give us leverage. i think that
there is little or no risk that the navajos would
intervene. i'm back from ba, rio and sao
paulo--interesting trip re brazil and argentina
litigation.  jim
--- "Soldano, Louis" <Louis.Soldano@ENRON.com> wrote:
> Gents - it looks like we need to get the negotiating
> team back together!
> it has been a few months so now it is time to
> negotiatiate for looping
> of the san juan lateral,(maybe some more mainline
> ??) and the standing
> rock C/S.
>
> Johnny/Larry - can you get in contact with Doug
> Cebryk/Ron
> Matthews/Dennis Alters on route and ROW cost
> estimates???
>
>
>
**********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or
> its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential
> and privileged material for the sole use of the
> intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please
> contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
> enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
> all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
> attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer
> (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
> binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp.
> (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
> recipient or any other party, and may not be relied
> on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel
> or otherwise. Thank you.
>
**********************************************************************

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com


From the conference call today, I realized you had not been copied on my memo
relating to Brazil taxes.

Hope this helps you understand the current tax situation.

Regards

Lynn
---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Aven/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/02/2000
02:40 PM ---------------------------

Lynn Aven
06/01/2000 07:19 PM
To: Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo Lisboa/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Rick Hopkinson
cc: Kent Castleman, David M Rosenberg/SA/Enron@Enron, Don
Black/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject: PIS/Cofins taxes on Brazil Trading Operations

Under current Brazilian tax law, the general rule is that  PIS/Cofins taxes
are due on the gross revenue that a a company receives.  In regards to
certain activities, including the trading activity that Enron wants to engage
in, there is a position that is supported by various law firms and by Arthur
Andersen that the PIS/Cofins tax is payable only on the trading margin.  We
have received a written opinion from the LaCaz Martin law firm supporting
this position and Arthur Andersen has advised that they have a number of
clients that are taking this position in filing their PIS/Cofins tax returns.

Discussions with LaCaz Martins have indicated that the position they advocate
is not one that the Brazilian tax authorities will currently follow nor one
that is without risk.    Arthur Andersen has confirmed that their clients who
take this position are required to  book a reserve for financial accounting
purposes pending the resolution of the issue.  Consequently, the earnings
impact of the PIS/Cofins tax will be the same for financial reporting
purposes whether or not the cash taxes are paid.  (LaCaz acknowledges that
the reserve must be booked)

There seems to be a great deal of optimism in Brazil that the PIS/Cofins will
be clarified as part of the pending tax reform.  The current proposals that
are being considered clearly state that the PIS/Cofins tax will be a
noncumulative tax similar to the ICMS (VAT) tax that exists.    Tax reform
appears to be a priority right now and hopefully there will be a resolution
of this issue so that we can move forward knowing that Enron's trading
margins will not be negatively impacted by the imposition of the PIS/Cofins
tax on the total revenue.

Unfortunately, the proposed legislation is anticipated to become effective in
2003, based upon an ageement between the President of Brazil and the
legislature that serves to keep the tax revenues high in the short term in
return for implementing a tax regime in later years that will support
business development.  This leaves Enron with the issue of how to treat
trading transaction that are consummated before 2003.

If the Enron trading company pays the PIS Cofins tax on its net margin rather
than on it gross revenue under the current law that is anticipated to be in
place until 2003, there is a strong likelihood that the revenue authorities
will asses additional tax.  Resolution of that tax dispute can be decided at
the Supreme Court level.  Our advisors have indicated that the resolution of
the dispute at the Supreme Court does involve some  political issues and
that the taxpayer is more likely to get a favorable decision if the dispute
is resolved after the law has been changed.  In other words, although the
taxpayers have a strong argument to pay the tax on the net margin under the
current law, the Supreme Court would likely not rule in their favor because
of the current political climate but would likely rule differently once the
law had been clarified and the intent clearly stated.

I am hopeful that we will get a resolution of the application of the
PIS/Cofins tax before the end of 2000.    We can then know for certain that
only the trading margins will be subject to the PIS/Cofins taxes.  However,
even if we get a favorable resolution, we still need to assess the risk for
the years prior to the effective date of the legislation.    Not only is
their the possibility that the tax will be assessed for years prior to the
effective date of the new legislation, there is the possibility that
penalties and interest will be imposed.   I am working with Arthur Andersen
in quantifying the exposure to interest and penalties and determining various
legal processes to minimize those costs should the trading company get an
assessment.

Getting tax relief under our broad tax reform legislation will be the easiest
way to achieve the goal of limiting the impact of the PIS/Cofins tax.
However, if tax reform does not succeed, Enron may need to partner with
financial institutions that are attempting to do similar trading
transaction.  Financial institutions and their lobbyists in Brazil have a
much better track record in getting industry specific tax relief.

I will continue to monitor tax reform.  Our advisors have indicated that the
tax reform movement is so strong that Enron would likely have little impact
on the process if it were directly involved in monitoring change.     The
issue to get directly involved in tax reform needs to be made by ESA
management.  I will be glad to help develop the issues so that the
appropriate persons can present the case for tax reform if deemed necessary.

Regards

Lynn


Chris,

As per clause 7.2 (a) (i) of the LNG sales contract we are providing you
EcoElctrica's Ninety Day Schedule given the two assumptions listed.

Assuming next ship is "Methane Arctic"
4-8 Apr '01 "Methane Arctic"
*26-30 Apr '01 "Matthew"
12-16 Jun '01 "Matthew"

* This nomination not to count as firm per clause 7.2 (a) (v) due to April
4-8 delivery being a small cargo.

Assuming next ship is "Matthew"
4-8 Apr '01 "Matthew"
14-18 May '01 "Matthew"
29 Jun- 5 Jul ' 01 "Matthew"

Regards,
Dan Masters


---------------------- Forwarded by Christopher Watts/NA/Enron on 05/14/2001
04:28 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Christopher Watts                           05/14/2001 04:27 AM

To: Ramanarao Tamma/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: Error in MDEA in P&L application

Rao,
The P&L application has a error in it.  Discrepancies are occuring on the
location of MDEA deal information within the P&L application.

Deals entered on the hourly tabs on the sheet labled "MDEA-SVCE" are not all
appearing on the sheet labeled "Checkout".  Alternatively, some deals
appearing on the "checkout" sheet are not apppearing on the hourly tabs.
Please take a look at this and make whatever corrections are necessary.


Don:
I will be leaving early today to catch a flight to New Orleans for a friend's
bachelor party in the Big Easy.  I will be back early on Sunday, so please
leave me a message if you need anything and I will be in on Sunday.  Hope to
make it back safely.  Have a good weekend.
Ben


Steve, Rob asked me to send the following suggested Q & A to you:

Q:  From a business standpoint are Gipper and Rockne now one company?

A:  Not until closing, which may not occur for several months.  Until that time the law [antitrust law] requires that we continue to deal with one another on a commercial level as competitors, just as we have in the past.  In general, this means that we cannot share commercial information, coordinate commercial behavior, agree on prices, etc.  We should act towards Rockne the same way that we would act toward any other competitor.

I trust this is what you needed.  If not just let me know.  Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark A Taylor/EFS/EES on 05/28/2001 10:27
PM ---------------------------
From: Robert Quick/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 05/25/2001 04:14 PM GDT
To: Mark A Taylor/EFS/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: FW:

Mark here is the current LD for tanker freight here - it is slightly less
descriptive but does still have a further defin. of the Index rather than
just relying on the Route number. From memory I recall that this had
something to do with Worldscale but this was so long ago I cannot remember
what Worldscale is. I will check with the EOL people and revert. tks

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Duggan, Caroline
Sent: 25 May 2001 16:09
To: Quick, Robert
Subject:

Hi Robert,

As requested, please find attached the Long Description for the UK Tanker
Freight. This is the finalised version which will be available as of Monday.
All we are going to do is replace the term "Pricing Period" with
"Determination Period" in the second paragraph of the original version.

If you have any questions please let me know.
Regards
Caroline PCG


<<Letter Agmt Enron Turbines Delta Power.DOC>>

Kay:

Attached is the execution draft of the ENA/PPL Letter Agreement.   Let me
know if you need anything else.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - Letter Agmt Enron Turbines Delta Power.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001
01:58 PM ---------------------------

Pamela Vande Krol Castro <castro@rice.edu> on 02/02/2001 12:59:28 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: MGMT 656

Here is your latest roster. We are up-to-date on all changes but, of
course, the students may still drop/add up to the second week of module 5.
When the time comes, please check your roster carefully and make sure that
the people on the list really are attending your course. Mistakes happen so
I just would like to make sure we have a correct record.

As always, let me know if you would like the excel folder with e-mail
addresses. I don't send them at the same time to avoid overwhelming our
e-mail system. Thanks for your help!

- Pam (713-348-6223)
 - 656.doc