FYI  --  Another brouhaha in the making.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com <mailto:tbradley@bracepatt.com>>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Tracey+20Bradley+22+20+3Ctbradley+40bracepatt+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] <mailto:[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Tracey+20Bradley+22+20+3Ctbradley+40bracepatt+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]>
Sent:	Thursday, August 16, 2001 8:48 AM
To:	jlimone@aeglobalmarkets.com <mailto:jlimone@aeglobalmarkets.com>; agold@coral-energy.com <mailto:agold@coral-energy.com>; susan.ginsberg@elpaso.com <mailto:susan.ginsberg@elpaso.com>; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; pat.cradock@huskyenergy.ca <mailto:pat.cradock@huskyenergy.ca>
Cc:	Charles Shoneman; Randall Rich
Subject:	California News -- State building natural gas reserve

FYI

State building natural gas reserve
Officials refuse to reveal details of the contracts
Bernadette Tansey, Lynda Gledhill, Chronicle Staff Writers
Thursday, August 16, 2001
?2001 San Francisco Chronicle

URL: <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/08/16/MN209239.DTL>

California has quietly started buying natural gas in response to the energy crisis, forming a gas supply operation that could become one of the largest in the state.

But in a repeat of the state's tactics when it lined up $43 billion in electricity contracts, officials won't say how much they have spent so far -- or how much they plan to buy in the future.

The state is already supplying gas for one power plant this month in an attempt to keep generating costs in check, and it has signed a small contract for gas storage space, state officials said. But they refused to provide The Chronicle with records of any of the purchases.

Releasing additional details -- such as the price officials paid -- would jeopardize the state's goal of keeping electricity costs down by delivering cheaper fuel to natural gas-fueled power plants that serve California, said Ray Hart, deputy director of the state Department of Water Resources.

If private energy traders knew what the state planned to buy, Hart said, they could rush in, scoop up the supplies and demand substantially higher prices to resell them to the state, he said.

Details of the state's gas deals will be made public as much as six months after they're signed, when they no longer give traders any advantage, he said.

That stance has raised an outcry among Republicans and consumer advocates, who criticized the Davis administration earlier this year for delaying disclosure of state power contracts that locked in a huge percentage of California's power needs for more than a decade.

"If there were a competitive bidding process, then, yes, the price should be secret while it's pending," said Marcel Hawiger, a natural gas analyst for the consumer group The Utility Reform Network. "But in a situation like it is now where they're just negotiating backroom deals, we think they should be disclosing everything right away."

Critics of the Davis administration who think the state already got rooked on the power contracts are equally leery about the state's foray into the natural gas market.

'A DISASTER'

"The governor's secrecy and lack of oversight has been a disaster for the people of California over the last six months," said Republican gubernatorial candidate and current Secretary of State Bill Jones. "These are the same novices who signed those energy contracts."

Hart said the gas operation would reinforce the state's long-term power buying effort that he credits with taming the out-of-control electricity market in California. His department was pressed into service as an emergency electricity buyer in January after skyrocketing power prices drove state utilities deeply into debt.

The state's new natural gas endeavor is intended as an insurance policy to make sure power plants under long-term contracts with the state don't hike their prices by claiming steep costs for fuel, a justification used by many generators during the height of the energy crisis last winter.

Under terms of some of the state electricity contracts, if the power plants don't make low-cost deals for gas, the state can step in and deliver the fuel itself.

The plan is to stand ready to provide fuel to generators throughout the state by lining up natural gas supplies, setting up to ship gas through pipelines within the state, and arranging for temporary storage space so any state gas surplus can be saved instead of being sold at a loss, Hart said. If the state were to step in as supplier for all the contracts that give it that option, the government would become one of the largest gas purchasers in the state, he said.

Hart's agency signed a four-year, $2 million contract in May with a Livermore gas consulting firm, Interstate Gas Services. The firm was authorized in July to make short-term gas deals with four suppliers in Texas and one in California.

STRATEGY QUESTIONED
Whether the state will be a successful player in the natural gas market is already being questioned by TURN and Pacific Gas and Electric Co. They say the state is reading the future gas market incorrectly by predicting prices close to double what experienced utility gas managers say the state will see by late 2002.

Bill Marcus, a TURN energy consultant, said the state's high forecasts alone could lead to unnecessary rate increases. Ron Low, a PG&E spokesman, said state gas cost overestimates would add $300 million to consumers' bills statewide through 2002; about $140 million would be paid by PG&E customers.

Hart scoffed at PG&E's claims.

"For them to say the price of gas is going to stay the same is ridiculous," Hart said. Gas prices have dropped this summer because of the cool weather and conservation efforts, he said. But things could change rapidly when demand peaks in the future. "You're going to see prices go up again."

Mark Allen Bernstein, an analyst with RAND, said the state might be doing the right thing if it buys natural gas when prices are low in the spring and fall and socks it away in storage basins to release when demand spikes in the summer and winter.

"We need to make sure there is sufficient storage to weather demand and price fluctuations," he said.

The state has lined up a small contract with the Wild Goose storage basin in Butte County and is supplying gas to an Alliance power plant as it starts operations this month, water department officials said. It has also locked in gas supplies at a set price for Dynegy plants in Southern California. The state has still not decided whether to contract for space on the interstate pipelines that bring gas to California from out-of-state producing basins, Hart said.

Hart said critics of the state's electricity contracts who said the deals all should have locked in a fixed price had already been proved wrong. By allowing some of the contract prices to float up or down with the price of gas,

Hart said, the state has been able to take advantage of a steep drop in gas prices this spring.

"We got totally hammered by the media for those (variable) contracts," Hart said. "My God, we're saving billions of dollars."

E-mail the reporters at btansey@sfchronicle.com <mailto:btansey@sfchronicle.com> and lgledhill@sfchronicle.com <mailto:lgledhill@sfchronicle.com>.

?2001 San Francisco Chronicle   Page A - 1


Friends,

Attached is the "Final" draft of the Harvard Business School case study
prepared by Harvard Professor Chris Bartlett and his research assistant Meg
Wozny. [please scroll down to the end of the next message for the attachment]
.  The content was developed from interviews with most of you.

Please review the case and let me know of any desired
edits/corrections/comments as soon as possible. [One obvious correction is
the spelling of Cindy Olson's last name].

We'd like to "sign off" on this within the next 2 or 3 days. Harvard
professors are excited about teaching this case this coming semester.  In
fact, Professor Don Sull will be focusing largely on this Enron Case this
semester, culminating in "Enron Day" at Harvard Business School April 26th,
featuring Jeff Skilling. Also, Chris and Meg will be in Houston this
Thursday, Jan. 11th, 'capping off' their work with video interviews with Ken,
Jeff and Louise, which will help "bring the case to life" for the students
studying it.

Please forward any edits/corrections/comments to me via E-Mail or via hard
copy (please deliver to EB 4710, or call me [3-6117] and we'll have it picked
up).

Thanks  to everyone for all your contributions to this exciting work!

--Christie.

---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 01/08/2001
09:57 AM ---------------------------

Meg Wozny <mwozny@hbs.edu> on 01/08/2001 09:31:00 AM
To: Christie.Patrick@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron case study

Christie:
Congratulations!  I don't know how you manage to work full-time at Enron
and study for a PhD at the same time.  Sounds superhuman to me!

The FedEx was marked for Saturday delivery, but in case you haven't
received it yet, I'm enclosing the draft as an attachment.
It would be great if we could get Enron's approval during our visit.  (I
know professors at HBS are interested in teaching that case as soon as it's
available.)

Thanks for all your help, and let me know if you have any questions,
comments, etc.
Best,
Meg

At 09:12 AM 1/8/01 -0600, you wrote:

>Meg...just got back in the office---anxiously looking for the package!!
>
>I finished my PhD (Psychology @ USC) class work last week--I made my last
case presentations this past Friday!! Now I only have my dissertation to
go!...Hooray!

>Looking forward to seeing you and Chris Thursday!
>
>--Christie.

 - Latest Draft1.doc
**************
Meg Wozny
Research Associate
Harvard Business School
Gallatin Lounge C
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163

voicemail: (617) 496-0802
facsimile:  (617) 496-6943
email: mwozny@hbs.edu


Start Date: 3/12/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001031211.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't read; currently locked by user 'Admin' on machine 'NAHOU-TRDTS3'.
Table
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't read; currently locked by user 'Admin' on machine 'NAHOU-TRDTS3'.
Table

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:  51.13 / Final:  51.10)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/12/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Attached is an outline for a new NPCo and Sierra tariff I prepared for a discussion with the ENA folks working on Nevada matters (including Gordon Savage).   Assuming we work through the politics (both internal and external), and the economics (both internal and external), the idea would be to propose the tariff in the Nevada rate case (scheduled for filing on October 1).


Please process this request ASAP.

Thanks,
Sally Beck

Bill Rogers@ENRON
02/12/2001 01:18 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: SAP Security@ENRON, Charm Weeks/NA/Enron@Enron, Patti
Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Access to Cost Center

Sally,
Patti Thompson is requesting access to cost center #103853 for timekeeping
purposes.  Please send "SAP Security" your approval for this access.

Thanks,
Bill
X56721


Thanks! Elena


Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041020.txt is empty.


The person at Trailblazer that we need to send the assignment document to is
Ron Brown at ronald_brown@kindermorgan.com


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL JOURNAL'S TECHNOLOGY DAILY PM EDITION
is now available at http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Editor's Note: Technology Daily will not be publishing from Dec. 24 to Jan.
1, 2002, due to the holiday season. We will resume publication on Jan. 2.

AFTERNOON HIGHLIGHTS:

CYBER SECURITY: A federal office will host regional conferences next year
to encourage the sharing of security information.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: The Copyright Office questioned the secrecy of an
agreement on webcasting royalties.

LOBBYING: Technology industry officials blamed partisan politics for
Congress' failure to clear an economic stimulus plan.

CYBER SECURITY: Since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, many states have
taken steps to boost regional homeland security.

TECH DAILY AFTERNOON FEATURES:
Issue Of the Week: Several high-tech lobbyists say politics had a bigger
impact on the industry's 2001 policy successes.
Click here to go directly to the feature -
http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/features/issues/issu011221.htm

Executive Summary: Editor Sharon McLoone pens a concise digest of the
week's topic high-tech policy news.
Click here to go directly to the feature -
http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/features/execsumm/exec011221.htm

=========================Advertisement==========================
CYBER SECURITY is now the top priority among government leaders.

CYBER SECURITY is Entrust's only priority.

http://www.entrust.com/government/index.htm
=========================Advertisement==========================

TODAY ON NATIONALJOURNAL.COM:
-- POLL TRACK EXTRA: 2002 Polling Numbers Reflect Nation's Moods
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/news/2001/12/1221ptextra.htm

-- YEAR IN PREVIEW: NationalJournal.com's Predictions For 2002
   http://nationaljournal.com/members/news/2001/12/2002preview.htm

========== PUT THE CAPITAL SOURCE ON YOUR HANDHELD ==========
Put 6,500+ Of Washington's Most Important Decision Makers At
Your Fingertips -- Get The Fall 2001 Capital Source For Your
Handheld Computer Today! For Details, Go To:

http://nationaljournal.com/qpass/capitalsource.htm
=============================================================

----------------------------
To stop receiving these E-mail Alerts:

Reply to this message and include the word "unsubscribe" (without quotes)
in the BODY of the message.
----------------------------

National Journal's Technology Daily is published daily by National Journal
Group Inc. For more information about National Journal Group's
publications, go to http://www.nationaljournal.com.


Who's your buddy????????????????????????????  A little hint wouldn't kill you, would it?
I tell you everything!
                                                            BH

-----Original Message-----
From: Corman, Shelley
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Hayes, Robert
Subject: Re:

Sorry to keep you in suspense!
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


I am calling Rob Walls to see if he can attend.

	Carol Ann Brown@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	03/30/2001 02:49 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Monday's follow-up meeting on cost control

Steve,

Should Jim Derrick be invited to Monday's cost control meeting?  I asked
Kevin and he told me to ask you.  Suzanne Brown came by today and said that
his name was brought up at last week's meeting.

Sincerely,

Carol Brown
Office of the Chairman
Enron Broadband Services, Inc.
713.853.7974
713.853.9469 - fax
carol_brown@enron.net


Yes we did.  We had a great time.  I heard Christine is pregnant again.  How
are you doing?  After a week off, I realize how much work sucks!

DG

Kim.Mayers@mail.sprint.com on 03/19/2001 09:07:06 AM
To: Darron.C.Giron@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RE: Sean

Hello,
It sounds like you got hooked up with Sean.  I went to Dallas on Friday
and just got your message.  How was Colorado?

Kim Mayers
Product Manager
Sprint Broadband Wireless Group
Phone: (913) 315-9132
PCS: (913) 269-8197
Fax: (913) 315-0760
kim.mayers@mail.sprint.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Darron.C.Giron [mailto:Darron.C.Giron@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 2:08 PM
To: Darron.C.Giron; kim.mayers
Subject: Sean

Hey,

How goes it?  I need your brother's phone numbers.  I am staying with
him
tomorrow night, but don't have directions.  We have only been
communicating
via email.  I hope you get this today.  Thanks.

DG


You probably saw the announcement that Mike Mcconnell is now CEO of Enron
Global Markets.  EGM will be focussing on a number of new and existing
markets (including coal, LNG, crude and products, interest rates,
agricultural commodities, equities, weather, etc).  One of the markets Mike's
group is actively considering is transport capacity.  I mentioned your work
in the area.  He is anxious to see it and meet with you after he has had a
chance to review it.


Tom:

This e-mail will confirm the site visit by your company at Wheatland, Lincoln
and Gleason.  The relevant information is as follows:

Pursuant to the Site Visit Procedures sent you by CSFB, if you have not
already done so, please send me the following:
List of your team members and titles
For outside consultants, state their employer
Name, phone number (office and mobile) and e-mail address of your designated
deal team leader

Lastly, I will serve as the due diligence coordinator for the three plants,
handling all questions and responses.  Should you have any due diligence
questions or require copies of any oversized documents, please contact me at
713.853.7998.

Regards,
Ben


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/13/2001 09:06 AM -----

	Stephen Swain@ECT
	01/12/2001 06:48 PM

		 To: Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES@ENRON
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Tribolet/Corp/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andre
Cangucu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Shelia
Benke/Corp/Enron@Enron, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Wanda
Curry/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Gordon
Savage/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Financial Analysis of PG&E and Proposed Terms for Settlement

Attached is a new version of the power cost model incorporating Roger's
updated info (retained generation costs and QF capacity payments).  It
improves the outlook for PG&E by > $2.00/MWH, mainly as a result of lower
cost estimates for their hydro.  SCE's numbers remains about the same.  FYI,
the prices in the model are at mid.  The switch to change to offer is now on
the Summary page.

Roger Yang@EES
01/12/2001 04:01 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael Tribolet/Corp/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Stephen Swain/PDX/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Andre
Cangucu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Shelia
Benke/Corp/Enron@Enron, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Don
Black/HOU/EES@EES, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON

Subject: Re: Financial Analysis of PG&E and Proposed Terms for Settlement

Attached is an update of utility delivery rates, native generation
weighted-average costs, and QF capacity payments and generation.

Roger


It was good to see you last week, too.  That was a big group, and there were
many people that I just passed in the halls!  I would love to participate,
but I will be out of town on September 14.  Rick Causey is hosting an offsite
meeting from Septemer 13-15 in San Antonio.  Thanks for thinking of me.
--Sally

Jo Ann Hill@ENRON
09/06/2000 10:50 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: SAP Initiative

Sally - it was great seeing you last week at the ASE in Dallas.  I'm sorry we
didn't have the opportunity to work together in any of the groups.  As you
may know,  I have just completed the SAP HR Implementation Project and my
current role, working for Andrea Yowman, is to maximize our investment in SAP
HR.

To that end, next Thursday, 9/14, two people from SAP will be here to
interview non-HR managers on a new project as described below.  You have been
identified as an excellent resource to participate in this effort, and I
would appreciate it if you would be able to spend 1/2 hour with this team and
have your admin spend another hour with them as well -- times noted below.

Please let me know if you are available and willing to participate in this
initiative.  It is the beginning of our ongoing relationship with SAP to
develop what Enron needs, and your input is considered invaluable to this
process.  Please respond with your availability at the times noted below and
I will prepare a final agenda and itinerary early next week.

Thanks for your consideration to participate in this effort.  If you have any
questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to call me at
3-0363.
Thanks.
Jo Ann

Proposed agenda
We would like to interview managers and their administrators.

 9:30 - 10:00 SAP Team interviews/observes manager#1
10:00 - 11:00 SAP Team interviews/observes admin assistant of manager#1

 1:00 -  1:30 SAP Team interviews/observes manager#2
 1:30 -  2:30 SAP Team interviews/observes admin assistant of manager#2

 2:30 -  3:00 SAP Team interviews/observes manager#3
 3:00 -  4:00 SAP Team interviews/observes admin assistant of manager#3

What is this project?
SAP is developing new software for managers that will be integrated with the
Workplace. It will be flexible and powerful enough to support managers at
all levels and in all industries. This project is supported directly by the
HR Desktop Manager group and has been endorsed by top managers throughout
SAP in the U.S. and Germany.

SAP has learned that to produce great software products we have to get close
to our end users. To do that, we need your help. Our goal is to visit eight
SAP customers in the U.S. Enron is one of the eight companies we would like
to visit.

Who do we want to interview and observe?
In a one-day visit, we want to observe and interview three types of
managers.
* High-level manager, involved in strategic planning, overall budget
responsibilities, strategic direction. The high-level manager tends to
delegate most of his daily and weekly activities to subordinates.
* Operational manager, involved in running a large department or small
subsidiary. Often reports to the high-level manager. Has budget and
personnel responsibility for the department or subsidiary. May also have
product-planning responsibilities.
* Group manager, primarily focused on a business activity such as
accounts payable manager, line manager, or production planner; but also
involved in managing a small group. Often has hands-on personnel and
lower-level budget responsibilities. Concerned with the day-to-day business.

What can you expect during a site visit?
We have found that the most efficient way to organize our interviews is to
meet with a contact person in your company (that would be me) who will then
escort us to our
interviews. This allows our team to introduce themselves and explain their
objectives.  Our interviews are conducted at the managers' workstations
where our team will spend about 1/2 hour observing the manager in his/her
daily work and asking questions.  We will then spend the next hour with
his/her
administrative assistant.

Interviewees do not have to prepare anything. We prefer to interview people
where they work because often the work environment can give us a lot of
insights about what managers need from a software product. We ask people to
be completely honest and forthcoming with us. We treat all sensitive
information with utmost confidentiality.

There will be two teams from SAP meeting with a total of 6 managers and
administrative assistants from
various areas in various business units.


Please plan to get together tomorrow, March 20 from 3-4 PM in 39C1 for a staff meeting.  We can talk about the new Enron severance policy, the return of the personal best award program or anything else that is on your mind.  If you have issues that you know that you would like me to address please drop me an email today so that I can do some research and be better prepared to answer your questions.

Shelley


-----Original Message-----
From: Stevens, Kirk
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:58 PM
To: Hayslett, Rod; Enron.ENE.Tracy Geaccone
Cc: Piro, Jim; FOWLER, PEGGY
Subject: Q3 Earnings - PGG

Rod, per your request, attached is an analysis to use in your discussion
tomorrow with Stan Horton regarding PGG's expected financial results for Q3.
More specifically, I laid out a plan as to how we might cover our current
overview gap of $19.5m (IBIT) from where our latest forecast came out.  As you
will see, several of these items will need to get AA&Co buy-in (items noted as
either Accouting Changes or Changes in Management Position).  I think we have
a good case for all of these, but we still need to go through the process with
them at the appropriate time.

In addition, I've note "Other Risks/Opportunities" for the quarter that could
have significant impacts on our ultimate results.  We will keep an eye on
these and manage them as appropriate.  We'll also try to keep you updated on
these as we progress through the Qtr.

Let me know if you have any questions.


I have asked my paralegal, Linda Guinn, to look into the status of the bill
and get back to you by Tues. Her direct no. is 713-853-6104.

	"JOANNE BENNETT" <joanne.bennett@blakes.com>
	12/01/2000 03:00 PM

		 To: <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: "DAN FOURNIER" <dan.fournier@blakes.com>, <peter.keohane@enron.com>
		 Subject: Project Stanley - Outstanding Invoices

Mr. Sanders:
?
The accounting department has advised us that our accounts  rendered to you
on July 31/00 ($453,331.06) and?August 23/00  ($48,000.42)?remain unpaid and
oustanding on the Project Stanley file.
?
Would you please call Dan Fournier (403-260-9636) or myself  (403-260-9637)
to discuss this matter.? Dan?would be more than happy  to review the invoices
with you if there is something unsatisfactory about  them.
?
Alternatively, we would appreciate it if you could attend to this matter as
soon as possible as we would like to clear it off our books.?
?
Thanks,
?
?
Joanne Bennett
Assistant to Dan Fournier
Blake, Cassels &  Graydon LLP
3500, 855 2nd Street S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 4J8
Tel:  403-260-9637
Fax: 403-260-9700
Email: joanne.bennett@blakes.com
?
This email communication is confidential and legally privileged.?
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at the telephone
number shown above or by return email and delete this communication
and  any copy immediately.? Thank you.


Booze, blackjack and bitches!!!  What a way to go!!!


yep

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:22 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

why?  because he is mean!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:21 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i love your dad

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:19 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

ok, but i'm warning you.  you have your hands full.  my dad always told me that if someone ever kidnapped me they would bring me right back.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:18 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i can take it, and its a deal on the new clothes thing

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:17 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i don't know about that.  i'm a brat!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:16 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i think i could

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:14 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

see, you couldn't handle me.  i am a freak!!  :)


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/02/2001 08:43
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
05/01/2001 10:56 AM
To: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Revised Escrow Disbursement Instruction Letter

Please review numbers.

Any chance D. Duran can come with you guys?  We should be ready in about 15
minutes.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/01/2001 10:56
AM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 05/01/2001 10:46:01 AM
To: "'gregorylang@paulhastings.com'" <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>,
"'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Revised Escrow Disbursement Instruction Letter

 <<2Z$803!.DOC>>  <<2Z$8RED.DOC>>

Greg and Kay:

I have enclosed clean and blacklined copies of the escrow disbursement
instruction letter, marked to reflect changes from the draft previously
circulated for signature.  The only revisions were to change the persons
named to sign this letter to be individuals who are available and who were
named as authorized on the respective incumbency certificate previously
submitted to Citibank, and to delete the bracketed information on the first
page of the letter addressing the GE letter of credit, as this is expected
to be available by fax on Wednesday.  Please ensure that the signature page
of this letter is signed and ready  to transmit to Citibank by fax upon
closing on Wednesday.

If no one has an objection, I will send a draft of this document to Estelle
Lawrence at Citibank today in order that she can be preparing to receive the
signed copy by fax tomorrow.   Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 139328v3
  139328vR3/2

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2Z$803!.DOC
 - 2Z$8RED.DOC


Message-ID: <sa37498d.020@dnc.democrats.org>
From: Josh Lahey <LaheyJ@dnc.democrats.org>
To: undisclosed-recipients <undisclosed-recipients:;>
Subject: 12-13-00 Statement by William Daley
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:03:45 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain

Gore/Lieberman Recount Committee

For Immediate Release
Wednesday, December 13, 2000

Contact:
Douglas Hattaway (FL)
850-205-8683
Chris Lehane (DC)
202-863-7171

STATEMENT BY WILLIAM DALEY

The Vice President has directed the recount committee to suspend activities.
He will address the nation this evening.

###


Steve -- Here it is!   Let me know if you need additional information.   -Lisa
----- Forwarded by Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron on 03/06/2001 02:19 PM -----

	Cathy Phillips@ECT
	03/06/2001 02:18 PM

		 To: Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: EGM presentation

Hi Lisa -

An electronic copy of the EGM Off-site presentation for Steve Kean is
attached below.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you.

Cathy P.
X-36898


Sweet house - I hope everything works out.  When are you trying to close?
Did they accept your offer?

Talk to you soon.

Kevin


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca
Sent:	Wednesday, June 20, 2001 6:14 PM
To:	Dillard, Barbara; Fletcher, Brenda H.; McMichael Jr., Ed; Ermis, Frank; Shively, Hunter S.; Tholt, Jane M.; Hewitt, Jess; Hodge, John; Townsend, Judy; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Baker, Natalie; Lucci, Paul; Tate, Paul; Allen, Phillip K.; Gay, Randall L.; Superty, Robert; Concannon, Ruth; Brawner, Sandra F.; Mahmassani, Souad; South, Steven P.; Miller, Stephanie; Pereira, Susan W.; Pollan, Sylvia S.; Walker, Terri; Kuykendall, Tori; Lamadrid, Victor; Shireman, Kristann; Muhl, Gil; Calcagno, Suzanne; Goodell, Scott; Sullivan, Patti; Smith, George F.; Kinsey, Lisa
Cc:	Pharms, Melinda
Subject:	Possible Change to GRI Rates in Jan 2002

The Gas Research Institute has filed a proposal to revise the GRI surcharges from the level previously authorized in the 1998 Settlement.  GRI's filing has not been approved yet, but the Settlement provides for an adjustment under certain circumstances so there is a good chance it will be.  We will advise you of the outcome when FERC issues an order on GRI's proposal.  The new rates would still be below the current rates.  Both sets of rates are provided below for your convenience.

Rates (cents per Dth)	Current 2001	Settlement 2002	New Proposal 2002
Commodity	0.7	0.5	0.55
High Demand*	9.0	6.0	6.6
Low Demand*	5.5	3.7	4.07
Small Customer	1.1	0.8	0.88

*refers to high load factor or low load factor customers.

If FERC approves this proposal, the rates for 2003 will likely change from those in the Settlement as well.


We are continuing work to ensure our new online trading system, UBSWenergy, is ready for launch on the week of Feb. 11, which is the week following the anticipated Enron/UBS Closing Date of Friday, Feb. 8.

To assist in this process, we are planning an online trading simulation for Thursday, February 7 from  0900 to 1100 (CST). It is planned to include all  traders, originators, mid/back-office staff and IT teams who would normally be involved with electronic trading.

Purpose of the simulation - The simulation will test our "live" trading environment (restricted to internal access only) and will:

Test the integrity and functionality of the system and related processes (including credit, risk, legal, operations, etc.)
Provide an opportunity for traders to verify their products and product setup
Demonstrate how the trading system and processes work to UBS staff visiting next week

Nature of the simulation - The simulation will include testing of all processes related to trading and mid/back-office functions:

Credit, Legal, Risk, Operations, and other groups:
Profile tests for "external" customers (role-played by Originators)
Profile tests for internal users (traders, back-office, etc.)
Data and Process checking as completed transactions flow through Mid/back-Office systems

Traders and Originators:
Traders will be managing their individual books and associated products. Although we may be restricted to certain financial products on launch day, both physical and financial will be available during the simulation. Each trader will be asked to manage their individual position and profitability goals for the simulation.
Originators and others will be asked to play the roles of counterparties. Credit limits, etc. will be tested during the simulation.

Information Technology:
Will assist in preparing data on the system for the simulation.
After the simulation is over, will work with the relevant groups to test the trade-data in various systems and risk books
Will ensure all simulation data is removed from the system after the simulation is complete.

Next steps

Traders and Originators will be contacted prior to simulation day to ensure they have appropriate access to the system.
Originators will be assigned specific roles. You should expect to receive an email and/or handout on or before Wednesday, Feb. 6.
UBSWenergy personnel will be meeting with back office personnel over the next several days to ensure everything is in place for the simulation.

Summary

This simulation is an important step towards re-launching our trading business. We appreciate the participation of everyone involved as we prepare for the public launch of UBS Warburg Energy and the UBSWenergy trading platform.

If you have any questions, comments, suggestions, or ideas regarding this simulation, please feel free to contact Bob Shults (30397) or myself (31861).

Regards,
Dave Forster
713.853.1861
E-Mail:	David.Forster@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Danny Kelley <dkelley@gowaninc.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Danny+20Kelley+20+3Cdkelley+40gowaninc+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:14 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn; 'R Dale'; 'Russell Parker'; 'Toy Smith'; 'Shelly Salley'
Subject:	Bammel Forest Utility Company

 - Bammel Forest Utility Company - Sept.doc


Fred needs to see you


Maybe we should consider going someplace for a couple of days, sans kids.


Tanya:

FYI.  This is the meeting you will be attending for Vince tomorrow.

Thanks!

Shirley

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000
10:09 AM ---------------------------

Dorothy Youngblood
09/28/2000 09:11 AM
To: Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jo Corbitt/NA/Enron@Enron, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Cherylene R Westbrook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Giselle James/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Risk Systems Enhancements Meeting 9/29/00 - 11:30 - 1:00 p.m.EB2868

Ladies,

Good Morning,

Just a reminder of the above referenced meeting will be held tomorrow
9/29/2000 @ 11:30 a.m. - 1:00 p.m.  Lunch will be served.

   ATTENDEES:

   Rick Buy
   Sally Beck
   Philippe Bibi (or representative from his Group)
   Bill Bradford
   Debbie Brackett
   Vince Kaminski (or representative from his Group)
   Ted Murphy
   Beth Perlman
   David Port
   Stephen Stock

Thank you in advance..

Dorothy
3-6114

---------------------- Forwarded by Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000
08:37 AM ---------------------------

Dorothy Youngblood
09/21/2000 11:41 AM
To: Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jo Corbitt/NA/Enron@Enron, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Cherylene R Westbrook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Giselle James/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Risk Systems Enhancements Meeting 9/22/00 - 11:30 - 1:00 p.m.EB2868

Ladies,

Just a quick reminder about the meeting tomorrow.  Lunch will be served -- so
each of your bosses or their representatives will be served.  So they do not
have to worry about bringing their lunches.  YEAH!!!!!

   ATTENDEES:

   Rick Buy
   Sally Beck
   Philippe Bibi (or representative from his Group)
   Bill Bradford
   Debbie Brackett
   Vince Kaminski (or representative from his Group)
   Ted Murphy
   Beth Perlman
   David Port
   Stephen Stock

Please see below:

   MENU

   Blackened  Chicken
   Fettuccine
   Fresh Seasonal Vegetables
   Ceasar Salad  w/Assorted Dressings
   Fresh Baked Rolls w/Butter
   Bottled Water
   Assorted Drinks
   Cookies (Assorted)

Thank you very much in advance.

Thanks..dy

---------------------- Forwarded by Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
10:59 AM ---------------------------

Dorothy Youngblood
09/19/2000 12:52 PM
To: Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jo Corbitt/NA/Enron@Enron, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Cherylene R Westbrook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Giselle James/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Risk Systems Enhancements Meeting

Ladies

Rick Buy would like to have the above meeting on a weekly basis.  Debbie
Brackett asked that I send an email to invite your bosses.  The meeting will
be from 11:30 a.m. - 1:00 p.m.  This meeting will be held each Friday - room
EB2868 for the rest of the year.

   Attendees:

   Rick Buy
   Bill Bradford
   Debbie Brackett
   Philippe Bibi
   Ted Murphy
   David Port
   Stephen Stock
   Vince Kaminski
   Beth Perlman
   Sally Beck

Thank you

Dorothy
3-6114
---------------------- Forwarded by Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000
12:29 PM ---------------------------

From:  Debbie R Brackett
       09/11/2000 10:09 AM

To: Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RAC IT Improvement Projects

---------------------- Forwarded by Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000
10:09 AM ---------------------------

	Rick Buy @ ENRON
	09/07/2000 04:35 PM

Sent by: Jo Corbitt@ENRON
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: RAC IT Improvement Projects


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/15/99 11:41 AM
---------------------------
From: Mark Taylor on 12/15/99 10:29 AM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Ashland Speciality Chemicals Company, a division of Ashland Inc.

Any chance of getting the confirms to say "Ashland Inc. through its Ashland
Specialty Chemicals Comapny division"?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           12/15/99 10:26 AM

To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Ashland Speciality Chemicals Company, a division of Ashland Inc.

Per my conversation with Frank, we are opening up the referenced counterparty
to trade financial under the division name  indicated above.


hey freak.  next summer's activities is indeed the subject of most of my
daydreaming time as of late....and some hiking will definitely occur.  as a
good mate's  wedding takes place on july 8 in LA, a whole big hunk of
something is not altogether likely - but sections of the PCT have come to
mind, as has the colorado trail, which is some 400 miles or so, i think.
about the latter i have just written a card to roger davidson to sound him
out about it, but by all means next summer is an open book.

i wonder how long of a section that is and why you thought about it in
particular - are y'all planning on the july 4 thing in nevada?

if you reckon you can take a decent amount of time off, well i will move
heaven and earth to accommodate both of our schedules.  for the rolina it
shall be a summer of love ( or no work, at any rate)

so do not yank my chain on this, por favor - like our Pops i support an
obnoxiously serious uberplanning habit.  give it a thought and let us know
what is up.

on another matter, was reading the economist a couple of weeks ago and just
about had a stroke when i came across the name of Enron in an article about
prospective tie-ups and buyouts amongst utilities and energy companies.
Good Lord, i did not know it was that big of a company.

thoroughly enjoyed a letter from the julie not so long ago and would
appreciate it if you told her it will be answered one of these random days.

danna and mom, mom and danna.  what exactly was the gist of their
conversation about the pedernales, to the best of your knowledge?  i will
have to speak with our misguided sister about that, but i will tell you now
i do not trust our mother in regard to the pedernales whatsoever.  there are
times i really do not understand how her mind works - and i suppose i do not
want to.

well i gots to git.  hope all is well with you and yourn and may this
missive find all y'all in good health and spirits, lording over all you
survey -

cheers

the Ralai Lama

>From: "Richard B Sanders" <rsander@ect.enron.com>
>To: "ROLLAND SANDERS" <bwanarol@hotmail.com>
>Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 17:55:11 -0500
>
>
>
>What about hiking the Pacific trail from Lake Tahoe to Yosemite in June/
>July of
>2000.
>
>

_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com


Just learned about this.  Any interest in GA covering this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES on 08/29/2000
01:06 PM ---------------------------

"Robert Weisenmiller" <rbw@mrwassoc.com> on 08/29/2000 11:20:44 AM
To: Mona Petrochko <mpetroch@enron.com>, Aaron Thomas
<athomas@newenergy.com>, Rick Counihan <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Workshop of note

FYI.

Bob

>Delivered-To: mrwassoc@atlas.dnai.com
>X-Sender: acomnes@pop.prodigy.net
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
>Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 11:09:38 -0700
>To: scm@MRWassoc.com, rbw@MRWassoc.com
>From: "G. Alan Comnes" <GAC@MRWassoc.com>
>Subject: Workshop of note
>X-Envelope-To: <rbw@MRWassoc.com>
>X-MDRemoteIP: 207.181.194.110
>X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rbw@mrwassoc.com
>
>This kind of stuff usually does not show up on the daily calendar ....
>
>
>Workshop Notice
>August 29, 2000
>10 am
>
>and
>
>August 30, 2000
>9 am - 12 noon
>         Pacific Gas and Electric Company
>77 Beale Street, Auditorium
>San Francisco
>
>The CPUC and the California ISO are sponsoring a workshop on the Electric
>Settlements Process in California's Direct Access market.  The purpose of
>the workshop is to provide all market participants with an overview of the
>Settlement Process and to share information about controls and practices
>used by various participants during the settlement process.
>Please RSVP by August 18th by calling or emailing Jeanette Plumley at the
>California ISO with the name of your organization and the number of people
>attending each day.  Ms. Plumley can be reached at (916) 608-5971 or by
>email at jplumley@caiso.com.
>


If Beth is our Systems person why is she in London.

Lavo


Just a follow-up to a voice mail I left you last week since I haven't heard
from you.   Do you have any documentation of the results of your SAP process
audit?  I am particularly interested in the areas of Global Counterparty and
the interface to SAP for customer and vendor master data.  We are
experiencing considerable problems and are curious to see your findings.  If
the audit was not in enough detail, then I would like to have you come back
for a more detailed look.


Attached please find an updated EPMI Power Credit Watch List as of 12/13/00.
Please direct any questions and/or comments to the Credit Hotline
(713-853-1803).

Regards,
Tracy


CALENDAR ENTRY:	EVENT

Description:

Date:		11/14/2000
Duration (days):	1

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


(See attached file: Powder-Room_optimized.jpg)(See attached file:
Laundry_optimized.jpg)(See attached file: Living-Room_2_optimized.jpg)(See
attached file: Living-Room_optimized.jpg)(See attached file:
Kitchen_optimized.jpg)
 - Powder-Room_optimized.jpg
 - Laundry_optimized.jpg
 - Living-Room_2_optimized.jpg
 - Living-Room_optimized.jpg
 - Kitchen_optimized.jpg


In order to point to the UBS environment in EnPower you need to change your PortCalc Host to the following.  This screen is reached through Tools - Option Environment.  Also, copy the PortCalc Host into your FTP Host:

Let me know if you have any questions.

Stacey

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


The Popsprd bridge will be migrated to Nahou-Scacl1 on April 26th for
debugging purposes. This migration should be transparent for Pops users with
the exception of personal spread sheets using Pops tags. The node name for
Pops tags on personal spread sheets will need to be changed to Nahou-Scacl1
to allow for updating of Pops data.

Please call me if you have any questions concerning the migration.

-Steve


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000
10:51 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Sharad Agnihotri                           11/27/2000 08:44 AM

To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Smile contsraints- sign error

I spotted a sign error (more or less) on
my document on constraints on smile shapes.
The corrected version is below. if there are any more errors please let me
know.

Best
Sharad


Attached is the (near) final draft of the organization announcement.

If you have any comments, please contact me as soon as possible.


Sees NG lows in place
Producers reacting to price mgmt
Coal swithcing to NG and power guys stimulating demand
But thinks jan feb neds to come of

Bull spead
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Nestled in the foothills of Arizona's Santa Catalina Mountains,
Miraval Life in Balance Resort is consistently ranked a Top U.S.
Spa by Travel & Leisure, Conde Nast Traveler, and the Zagat
Survey.  At this spiritual oasis, "mindfulness" is considered one
of the most powerful ways of approaching life for total health
and enjoyment.

This all-inclusive retreat will be giving away a 4-night package
for two, including deluxe casita-style accommodations, three
gourmet meals and snacks daily, all non-alcoholic beverages,
complete use of resort facilities, access to all scheduled group
programs and activities, one 50 minute personal spa service per
person per day, round trip airport transfers, and more.

The winner will be selected from those users who register online
now through January 31, 2002.  Indulge in sport, fitness,
nutrition, creative expression, meditation, adventure, and yoga.
Be pampered with spa therapies, massage, and salon treatments.
Sign up today for a chance to discover what Miraval Life in
Balance is all about!  For additional information, and to enter,
go to Miraval's website at:
http://www.miravalresort.com/contest.asp

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this mailing list, go to:

http://luxurylink.emailfactory.com/handler.cfm?idAddress=L9669401591.23240
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Please see attached Quarterly Board Meeting Notice for August 23, 2001.
Thank you.

Donna M. Cagle
Executive Administrator to President & CEO
Mariner Energy, Inc.
580 WestLake Park Blvd., Suite 1300
Houston, TX  77079
281/584-5511 (phone)     281/584-5515 (fax)
dcagle@mariner-energy.com

 <<Mtg. Notice to BOD2.doc>>


---------------------- Forwarded by Brad McKay/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2001 03:35 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Click at Home @ ENRON                           05/07/2001 10:20 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Employees United States
cc:
Subject: ClickAtHome Portal is HERE!

Version 2.0 of the ClickAtHome Portal is now available!
 Log into www.clickathome.net now, from work or home!

Access the PEP System through the portal!
 Choose your reviewers and fill out your evaluations in the comfort and
privacy of your home!

Outlook Web Access and eHRonline will be available SOON!

The ClickAtHome portal is fully customizable for you!
 YOU choose the content on each page, as well as the look and feel!

Note: the ClickAtHome portal must be launched through an Internet Explorer
browser, 5.0 or higher.


Bummer.  Thanks for the quick answer.  The Maritimes case does give us at
least a small foothold to use.  DF

	From:  Susan Scott                           02/04/2000 11:08 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: sstojic@gbmdc.com, fkelly@gbmdc.com

Subject: Re: Gallup request for rehearing

My several hours of on-line research on this last Sept. turned up nothing on
point.  The only case that even addressed the issue of confidentiality of
contracts in a certificate context was one I'll excerpt here:

**
 In Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C., 80 FERC P 61,346 (1997),
Maritimes requested confidentiality for the precedent agreements it
submitted. Commission staff denied the blanket request, but indicated that
Maritimes could request that specific provisions be kept confidential.
Maritimes subsequently requested that the contract terms and various cut-off
dates [FN29] in the precedent agreements be kept confidential because such
information was commercially sensitive. On the other hand, Maritimes
requested that the terms and conditions of the backstop agreements be kept
confidential, but was willing to make the contract terms of 10 and 20 years
public. Generally, the Commission will deny blanket requests for
confidentiality of agreements that are submitted to demonstrate market
support for new facilities. [FN30] However, in the instance case, the
contract terms of the backstop agreements are public and, thus, evidence of
longterm subscriptions for Maritimes proposal are in the public record and
support our finding that Maritimes has demonstrated a market for its proposed
services. Therefore, we find no compelling reason to require the length of
the terms of the other precedent agreements or the cut-off dates to be made
public.

FN29 Cut off dates refer to points in time when individual contracts could
terminate contingent on the
occurrence of certain events.

FN30 See, e.g., Colorado Interstate Gas Company, 76 FERC P 61,291 (1996).
**

In Amoco Production Company and Amoco Energy Trading Company V. Natural Gas
Pipeline Company of America, 82 FERC P 61,037 (1998), which involved a
request for confidentiality of a gas sales agreement, the Commission
explained why a gas sales agreement should be given confidential treatment
but transportation contracts should not:

the Commission has explicitly held that gas transportation rates stand on a
different
footing from gas sales rates because pipelines and their competitors are
subject to similar disclosure
requirements. In ANR Pipeline Co., the Commission explained that unlike gas
sales in a
competitive market, transportation of natural gas is still regulated under
the assumption that the pipeline
exercises market power. Even where transportation competition exists, that
competition is from other
pipelines that are likely to be subject to similar filing and reporting
requirements.

There were several cases denying confidential treatment of rates in the
context of Section 4 cases.

Just to make sure I found everything, I'll do some follow up sometime in the
next few days and let you know if I find anything.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           02/04/2000 10:43 AM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com,
fkelly@gbmdc.com

Subject: Re: Gallup request for rehearing

Susan's draft has inspired me to vent months worth of frustration at the
Commission.  To save Susan from trying to translate my weird scribbles, I'm
having Martha type up my vitriol.  Please hold off on detailed comments on
Susan's draft unless you've already finished them.  I'll circulate a revised
draft to you all later today.  In the mean time, Susan and Frank and Steve,
are there not some cases in which the Commission has specifically granted
confidential treatment of precedent agreements or discount agreements in
expansion cases.  I know the bulk of authority is against us, but I seem to
recall at least a few stray decisions where the Commission granted confid.
treatment (even if only for a limited time).  Lets talk.  Thanks. DF

	From:  Susan Scott                           02/03/2000 03:52 PM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: sstojic@gbmdc.com, fkelly@gbmdc.com

Subject: Gallup request for rehearing

Here is the attachment...

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 02/03/2000
03:51 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           02/03/2000 03:51 PM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: sstojic@gbmdc.com, fkelly@gbmdc.com

Subject: Gallup request for rehearing

Attached is my draft of a request for rehearing.  It incorporates Mr.
Stojic's and Mr. Kelly's initial comments.  Please review it and let me know
if you have any comments on or before Tuesday afternoon (I will be out of the
office Monday).  Thank you!


Kim, here is the term sheet for City of Redding. Let's discuss before you go
anywhere with this.


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000 08:34 AM
---------------------------

Molly Harris
03/27/2000 05:51 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad
Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Credit Responses 3/27

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 3/27/00.  Please note new
products have been added and are highlighted in yellow.

Regards,
Molly


This is the entire conversation that I did not send previously.

Peter E Weidler
04/23/2001 12:02 PM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron
cc: Rod Hayslett/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: Re: GTB construction

ok - makes sense.

Pete

Stanley Horton
04/23/2001 08:18 AM
To: Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron

Subject: Re: GTB construction

That is not the issue.  By putting us in the middle between GTB and Solar we
would be the ones that would have to resolve any differances between the wo
if the unit does not function properly.  The whole deal gets complicated
since there is a design engineer. oerator and equipment manufacturer and we
get in the middle between the equipment manufacturer and owner.  If the unit
does operate properly, everyone will point fingers at everyone else,  I have
seen this happen coutless times on EE&CC projects.  Why do I want to take
this risk on an international project that according to Jerry's own numbers
gets me about $800,ooo in current perios earnings and another $400'ooo
deferred over many years.  It just is not worth the time and risk for that
kind of money.  I think Phil Lowry agrees with this assessment also.


Attached is the Enron Americas GasTrading violation memo for  Maturity Gap Risk for August 13, 2001.  The Office of the Chairman for Enron Americas is responsible for printing out a hard copy of this memo, signing and returning the hard copy to Chris Abel at 3560f, who will forward it to RAC to obtain their signature.

Thank You


Wayne,

Oman LNG is requesting a meeting in Houston in early June and a site visit at DPC in the near future. We discussed these meetings while in Oman in March. I have been trying to contact Clay and get his view on the desirability of such meetings at this point. Also, what would be the agenda?

Comments?

Paul


Cindy

I think I may have just committed (by omission) my first (and may be only for this season's) fatal error - I forgot to get ranked and have never been ranked before. I don't know the  rules but I would assume until I get ranked I wouldn't be able to play.  I will try to get ranked ASAP but in the meanwhile.... do you know what the rules require.   I am so sorry if this is causing any problems.   Thanks

Elizabeth Sager
713-853-6349

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	CKMADI@aol.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-CKMADI+40aol+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 1:46 PM
To:	Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	singles

I have you playing the late match at Memorial Park Wednesday night (8:15pm).
I have you playing Line 4.  We are the home team (Avengers), so please bring
balls.  Leave enough time to find parking (it shouldn't be bad at that time
of night).

Cindy


Dale:

The product description looks fine to me.

Leslie

	Dale Neuner
	07/19/2000 06:58 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy M Norton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: US Power PJM Demand Product Type (Offered by the Weather Desk

This is a follow-up to my e-mail sent earlier. The Product Type has been
built in test and awaits your approval. Please offer that approval as quickly
as posible, as John Lavoratto is eager to see this offered on EOL.

Dale
3-9746


Revised UAE Model
Ben


Question:  First of all, Ben is not on the Incumbency Certificate (we have
Duran, Presto and Tricoli) so can Ben sign the Escrow Agreement?

Second:  If it is okay for Ben to sign this document, would you like me to
change his title from Director to Attorney-In-Fact?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Reuter+2C+20Marisa+22+20+3CMReuter+40KSLAW+2Ecom+3E+40EN
RON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:20 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Cc: Carnahan, Kathleen; Booth, Chris; Keffer, John
Subject: FW: ESCROW AGREEMENT

Kay:

In order to expedite the formation of the escrow account, I am attaching the
signature page to the Escrow Agreement, and ask that you obtain three
executed originals.  Once you have obtained the required signature, please
forward the 3 signature pages to Tremaine Wright at Paul Hastings along with
the executed incumbency certificate, which Kathleen has.  Since we have not
seen the final draft of Escrow Agreement, be sure to tell Tremaine to hold
the signature pages in escrow pending further written instruction from you.
Tremaine will deliver the Escrow Agreement, incumbency certificates, fee
letter, and Form W-9 to Citibank as soon as all the documents are in order.
Tremaine's contact information is listed below:

Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
399 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022-4697

Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Regards,

Marisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Wright, Tremaine S. [mailto:TremaineWright@paulhastings.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 3:53 PM
To: 'Reuter, Marisa'
Subject: ESCROW AGREEMENT

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 05/30/01 16:52:58
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of
conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are
two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.
If you have any questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

============================================================================
==
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."

============================================================================
==

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To:
Subject:
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 17:24:40 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed ;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C0E94E.3F41C650"

 - ATT21924.txt
 - ATT21925.htm
 - 7@4S01!.DOC


This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination.

       ddunkelberger@oneok.com

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MHEARD>
To: ddunkelberger@oneok.com
CC: Williams, Jason R (Credit) </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JWILLI10>
Date: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:55:19 GMT
Subject:

Pursuant to Jason Williams' request, attached is our form master netting
agreement.  Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions or
comments.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com

				 <<Master Netting & Security Agmnt 10 h
v1.doc>> 	 <<Master Netting Agreement Credit Support Annex 10
d.doc>>


The attached memo is being forwarded to you at the instruction of Jeff Hodge.

Joanne Rozycki
Senior Administrative Assistant
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3880D
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-5968     Fax:      (713) 646-3490
Email:   joanne.rozycki@enron.com


Latest forecast for 2001:

Net Income - $26MM
Revenues - $9-9.5 billion


t:  Please print for me.  Thanks a lot! Michelle
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 08/01/2000 11:22
AM ---------------------------

Ann Park@ENRON
08/01/2000 10:11 AM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, FMackin@aol.com
cc: Timothy Callahan/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Due Diligence

Attached is my due diligence template for Canada.  Please feel free to use
those parts of it you feel appropriate.  Michelle, if I do not hear back I
will assume the deal team has decided to have the counsel handle this in my
place.  Please be sure to let Patrick Wade know.  If I can be of any other
assistance please let me know.


Please note the next ER Marketing Campaign Roll Out Meeting date will be communicated at a later date.

Regards,
Jo Ann Matson
Enron Corp
jo.ann.matson@enron.com
(713) 345-7237


Has the contract been sent out yet?


Dave

Should we invite Presto and Beldon to this meeting.  I think so.


Wus up!!   Just wondering if you give me directions from BWI to our
accomidations on the base??  I will be arriving at BWI @ 12 noon.  I rented a
car ,and I am driving down to DC.   I will then take a cab from the base to
the pentagon ,,,, I guess.    Can't wait to see you , Jan , and the kids!

MC

perge!


Sorry about that Vance - I just missed it.  I don't see any problems here
either.

	Vance Meyer@ENRON
	04/12/2001 04:29 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: InternetWeek

Hey Mark --

I sent this note on March 23 while you were out of the office.  Robert Jones
is fine with this opportunity and I just want to double check that you're ok
also.

Thanks

Vance Meyer
---------------------- Forwarded by Vance Meyer/NA/Enron on 04/12/2001 04:27
PM ---------------------------
From: Vance Meyer on 03/23/2001 10:55 AM
To: Robert W Jones/ENRON@enronXgate, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Greg Piper/Enron@EnronXGate, Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: RE: InternetWeek

Gentlemen --

The background on this message from Greg relates to his potential involvement
in an advisory board for Internet Week magazine.  Essentially, this means
that Greg would attend a couple of meetings per year and participate in a
handful of telephone conversations all aimed at helping the editors at
InternetWeek calibrate themselves in terms of what's important and what's not
in the technology world.  Here are the advantages I see:

Greg gets to work with several high-level CTO's and technology CEO's who also
participate on the board.  This is good exposure for our plans to provide IT
services as a business.
Good exposure in terms of IT recruiting.  The more high-profile places we
are, the better.
Good media relations and the potential for us to track editorial thought in
the technology world.

Philippe had originally planned to do it, but I think we're concluding that
it's a perfect place for Greg to be as part of his efforts to put new
origination activities in motion.

From my PR perch, I see no conflicts but Greg is right to suggest that we run
it by you first.  Ok with you?

Vance Meyer
Director, Media Relations

Vance Meyer, Enron Corp.
(713) 345 4459
----- Forwarded by Vance Meyer/NA/Enron on 03/23/2001 10:51 AM -----

	Greg Piper/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/23/2001 08:26 AM

		 To: Vance Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Robert W Jones/ENRON@enronXgate, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: InternetWeek

I am fine with it.  Talk to Robert Jones in HR and Mark Taylor in legal to
make sure we understand my committment and that it doesn't conflict with any
Enron policy, etc. before you do it.

Thanks.

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Meyer, Vance
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 8:09 AM
To: Piper, Greg
Subject: InternetWeek

Greg --

If you have talked with Philippe and are comfortable with the Internet Week
advisory board opportunity, I'd like to send them your bio and lock it in.  I
have a copy of your bio from Kal.

Let me know, and we'll push the button.

Thanks

Vance

Vance Meyer, Enron Corp.
(713) 345 4459


Enjoy!
 - 20011207ERCOT_LOAD.XLS
 - 20011207ERCOT_FLOW.XLS


Daren:
I am taking over the Duke account from Katherine and am having trouble with
8/00 production.  It looks like we have some spot deals included in the
exchange deal 157288.  I think days 9 - 31, which are priced at GD - 0.10,
need to be moved to a new ticket if they are spot.   Let me know if you
agree.  Also, can you confirm for me that days 8/5 and 8/6 are suppose to be
exchange?  The sale volume for those two days was zero, so there was no
exchange.  We have not received any statements from Duke yet, so there is
nothing to verify our volumes.

You may also want to look at Sept. 2000 for deal 157288.  It looks like spot
deals are being included in the exchange deal.  Those will need to be moved
to a new ticket if they are spot.

Thanks,
Megan


Start Date: 10/18/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101805.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/18/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SRP
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Message sent from the pjm-customer-info mailing list at
pjm-customer-info@majordomo.pjm.com:

The PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. filed the PJM Customer Load Reduction Pilot
Program with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on Friday July 7.
This innovative program pays participants to reduce their own load or operate
backup generation to produce a beneficial load reduction for the grid during
PJM
emergency events at times of peak demand.

"We are excited about this program that will provide an important resource
during times of high electricity usage. The program will augment the region's
well-established emergency procedures" stated Bruce Balmat, Vice President,
System Operations. The pilot program was developed in response to a May 17,
2000
FERC notice and is in effect through September 30, 2000.

A full description of the program and PJM's filing, including participation
requirements and procedures, can be found on the PJM website (www.pjm.com).
Those interested in participating in the program should complete a
registration
form indicating their load reduction plan. Those who are not already PJM
Members, will become special non-voting members with membership fees waived.

Please DO NOT REPLY to this message. If you have a question for PJM Customer
Relations and Training, please send an e-mail to custsvc@pjm.com.

To unsubscribe from this list, send an e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pjm.com
containing only the following line in the body of the e-mail:

unsubscribe pjm-customer-info


Team Vitro:

I wanted to run these changes by you before sending them to Jeff Smith.

Jeff S. has lobbied for deleting the language on assignment, and state that
assignment of the consolidation agreement will be subject to the same terms,
etc. as the other 2 contracts.  He also provide alternative language which
appears to be close to what was in the previous draft. Since I didn't know
the genesis of the language in the consolidation agreement, so I thought I
would check with you first.

I eliminated 5 (a) because the contracts allow for partial termination.


She needs a higher prc rating for an office. rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Port, David
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 1:03 PM
To:	Buy, Rick
Subject:	FW: offices

FYI - I could suggest she has mine ?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schultz, Cassandra
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 10:01 AM
To:	Port, David; Valdez, Veronica
Subject:	offices

Am I the only RAC VP w/o an office?  Did we run out of space?


Start Date: 1/26/02; HourAhead hour: 16;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012616.txt


Chris:

We emailed the Schedule on Dec. 18.

We Fed Exp'd the "package" (except the ENE guaranty which is being executed)
on Dec. 19 to the lawyer at your direction.

Sara


Hello All:

We will be celebrating John's 3rd and Henry's 5th birthdays

APRIL 13th (Saturday) @ 4:30 p.m. @ our home.

Please mark your calendars, give us a call and confirm your attendance.

Hope everyone can make it.

Sheila & Erik

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


Thanks for the commnets, Lynn.

I've faxed you a copy of "Plan B."

I'll let others chime in, but ideally it seemsthat we'd want to start the
meetings next week and have at least the rough outline of a proposed,
comprehensive solution to put on the table for discussion.  But at a minimum
we'd want to get "the process" nailed down by very early next week.

Best,
Jeff

	Lynn.A.Lednicky@dynegy.com
	05/15/2001 07:34 AM

		 To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
		 cc: sryan@aesc.com, hoffman@blackstone.com, bbailey@duke-energy.com,
john.harrison@elpaso.com, rachael.king@elpaso.com, clark.smith@elpaso.com,
skean@enron.com, tom.allen@mirant.com, sonnet.edmonds@mirant.com,
randy.harrison@mirant.com, alex.goldberg@williams.com,
Maureen.McVicker@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Summary of Today's Call/Agenda for Tomorrow's Call

Jeff,

Sorry I was unable to make the call yesterday.  Thanks for the summary.  My
comments and questions are indicated below.

Please fax a copy of Plan B to be at 713 767 6677.

     You suggest starting the "process" in Sacramento next week.  I'm not
     sure exactly what this means.  Are we saying we will have a proposal
     or that we will be advocating a process/forum to get all the right
     parties at the table?
     Did we set a time for the next call on Friday?
     With regard to the Issues list, here are a few extra items:
          need to make clear that real price signals should be sent to all
          sectors (not just those that wouldn't vote for Davis anyway) as
          soon as possible
          I cannot imagine a situation in which the IOUs are returned to
          financial stability within 3-6 months; my guess is that it will
          be at least a year
          if IOUs are returned to the procurement role, we need to make
          sure that they have the appropriate risk management tools
          (ability to enter forward contracts, options, etc.)
          if IOUs are returned to the procurement role, we also need to
          have assurances that the situation we have today won't happen
          again;  for example, if the state assigns the CDWR contracts to
          the IOUs and three years from now the market price is less than
          the contract price, what assurances does anyone have that the PUC
          will not try to make the IOUs absorb the difference
          If we want to go to a core/non-core approach, why do we need to
          wait 18-24 months;  it seems to me that we could start that
          process now
          As for legal claims and investigations, we need to make clear
          that we want to resolve all state and federal claims;  the civil
          claims present a different set of challenges for resolution
          as for discounts on receivables, I'm not ready to commit one way
          or another; however, if there are discounts they must apply to
          all market participants - not just the ones that Davis can get to
          the table.

Lynn

Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com on 05/14/2001 08:47:31 PM

To:   sryan@aesc.com, hoffman@blackstone.com, bbailey@duke-energy.com,
      Lynn.A.Lednicky@Dynegy.com, john.harrison@elpaso.com,
      rachael.king@elpaso.com, clark.smith@elpaso.com, skean@enron.com,
      tom.allen@mirant.com, sonnet.edmonds@mirant.com,
      randy.harrison@mirant.com, alex.goldberg@williams.com
cc:   Maureen.McVicker@enron.com

Subject:  Summary of Today's Call/Agenda for Tomorrow's Call

Greetings:
n order to keep everyone in the loop, the folks on today's call wanted to
send out a brief summary of the call for the benefit of those who couldn't
make it.  Apologies for any omissions, inaccuracies, etc.  Others who were
on the call please chime in if I've gotten anything wrong, or missed
anything.

Best,
Jeff

SUMMARY
   Enron, Duke, El Paso and Williams were on the call, as was Michael
   Hoffman of the Blackstone Group (the Governor's financial advisors).
   On the subject of how the group would organize itself, it was agreed
   that the calls would be open to anyone who wanted to participate.
   A smaller group consisting of Duke, El Paso, Enron, and Williams would
   take the lead on walking the halls of Sacramento, meeting with policy
   makers, and advocating whatever plan the group develops.
   Folks agreed that achieving a comprehesive solution requires a tangible
   process; that is, the principals need to get in a room, face to face,
   for however long it takes to work out a resolution.
   It was agreed that the process should start no later than the beginning
   of next week, and that it should take place in Sacramento.
   It was decided that the Legislature and the Attorney General needed to
   be brought into the process as soon as possible, i.e., next week.
   There was some discussion regarding the release today of "Plan B."  Plan
   B is a plan proposed by Democratic and Republican legislators as an
   alternative to the MOU that the Governor struck with Edison.  After that
   call I received a copy of "Plan B."  If you'd like a copy please send me
   your fax number.
   Folks on the call agreed to have the next "supplier-only" call-in
   meeting on Friday.
   Finally, Michael Hoffman said that they are hoping to have a "ratings
   agency level" presentation prepared by the end of the week.  The goal of
   the presentation is to reassure capital markets that the bonds the state
   seeks to issue are solidly backed by retail rates.

The Agenda for Tomorrow's Call with the Governor's Staff
Item #1:       The Credit Issue
   Michael Hoffman said that the Governor's office wants to start
   tomorrow's meeting discussing the creditworthiness issue.
   Hoffman said that the Governor's folks are hoping to have completed by
   the start of tomorrow's meeting a draft of an agreement between the
   California PUC and CDWR.  The agreement is designed to ensure that DWR
   gets paid for power services delivered.
   If the draft is ready, they'd like to discuss on the call tomorrow.

Item #2:       Identify the Components of a Comprehensive Solution.
   It was agreed that our group should put on the table at tomorrow's
   meeting the universe of issues that need to be included in a
   comprehensive solution.
   Enron was asked to take a first stab at what those components are.  The
   following is a brief outline, which is not intended to be definitive,
   but a starting point for discussion.
     Utility creditworthiness
        retail rates must reflect costs
     Increase supply
        streamline and otherwise reform the siting process
     Decrease demand
        establish real-time pricing
        implement demand buy-down and other conservation programs
     Create a real market
        Remove the State from the power-buying business as soon as possible
        (e.g., once new rates are in place and utilities are returned to
        creditworthiness; approximately 3-6 months)
        Return the procurement role to the utilities
        Reinstate Direct Access immediately for all customers
        Within 18-24 months, create a "core/noncore" market structure for
        electricity, similar to California's market structure for natural
        gas
     Keep the industry in the hands of the private sector
        Reject proposals calling on the State to take over transmission,
        generation, etc.
     Resolve outstanding legal claims, investigations, etc.
        Resolution requires certainty and prompt payment (understanding
        that discounts on receivables is on the table for discussion)


Done !

tm

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hunter, Nicole
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 4:05 PM
To: Moran, Tom; Jones, Tana
Subject: Counterparty- Genesis Ventures

Tom/Tana-

Genesis ventures migrated last night. The counterparty needs to be retouched
on the 5 European products (read only) and also US Recycled ONP Physical
(trade).

I would appreciate it if you could revisit this counterparty when you get a
chance.

Best Regards,

Nicole Hunter
Clickpaper Support Team
713-345-8438


Done

-----Original Message-----
From: Frevert, Mark
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 9:08 AM
To: Horton, Stanley
Subject: FW: URGENT NEED FOR A CONTACT

Stan, could you please have someone respond to this . Thanks . Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: A.S. Nyirenda [mailto:asnyirenda@zesco.co.zm]
Sent: 08 November 2001 06:50
To: Frevert, Mark; mmetts@enron.com; Baxter, Cliff AEP HPL USER; Skilling, Jeff; Lay, Kenneth
Cc: Santana, Vedruna J
Subject: URGENT NEED FOR A CONTACT

Dear Sirs,
We are an electricity utulity in Zambia which is undertaking a World Bank funded Power Rehabilitation Project. We have been trying for some days to make Email,telephone and fax contact with someone in Enron dealing with such issues without success. This we have been trying in conjunction with your Embassy office here. As can be seen from the message below we require a feedback from the relevant person or any one of you TODAY! Please reply to us as a matter of urgency.
Regards
Aaron S Nyirenda
----- Original Message -----
From: A.S. Nyirenda <mailto:asnyirenda@zesco.co.zm>
To: Cuthbert E. Roberts <mailto:crobert2@ei.enron.com>
Cc: Kennedy Mbewe <mailto:kmbewe@zesco.co.zm> ; POWER REHABILITATION PROJECT <mailto:prpzesco@zamnet.zm>
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:31 PM
Subject: TD 98 TRANSFORMER CONTRACT FOR KAFUE GORGE POWER STATION

Dear Mr C.Robberts

Zambia Power Rehabilitation Project:

During the shortlisting for Contract CD 94-95 your company, Enron International, was one of those shortlisted for the contract. Later the component of transformers was removed and packaged separately as TD 98. We are about to send out Invitations to Tender for TD 98 to all the previously shortlisted companies.
As a matter of urgency, please confirm to us the contact Email address, Telephone, Fax, Postal and physical addresses. Reply to both  Emails shown below.
Regards
Aaron S. Nyirenda : Project Manager- Generation

Zesco PRP,  P O Box 33304, Lusaka, Zambia
Telephone +260 1 239343/ 237597  Fax +260 1 239343/ 237597/223970
Email: asnyirenda@zesco.co.zm <mailto:asnyirenda@zesco.co.zm> or  prpzesco@zamnet.zm <mailto:prpzesco@zamnet.zm>


Wit makes its own welcome, and levels all distinctions. No dignity, no
learning, no force of character, can make any stand against good wit. -Ralph
Waldo Emerson (1803-1882)


These are the name overlays to date for the April 2001 reporting period.  The
most recent is the change from Sceptre Energy Inc. to CanNat Energy Inc.  For
details, please refer to the bottom tab April 2001.

Shortname changes will be coordinated with ERMS IT on Fri, Apr 6.


Attached for your review and comment is a draft table identifying incoming
interstate capacity at receipt points on SoCalGas' system and a system map
identifying those locations, per the request of ALJ Biren.? We have confirmed
wherever possible the incoming receipt point capacities with the pipelines
and also tried to fairly characterize the take-away capacities and deliveries
from those receipt points.? Please forward your comments to me as soon as
possible so that we can coordinate the filing of the draft exhibit to the
service list by July 16.

? <<exhibitpipecap.xls>>  <<SoCalGas.doc>>

 - exhibitpipecap.xls
 - SoCalGas.doc


attached is a notice from CERA re California bill AB 1 for your review and
files; please advise if additional material is requested - Eric Benson

===============

----- Forwarded by Eric Benson/NA/Enron on 02/05/2001 05:07 PM -----

	webmaster@cera.com
	02/05/2001 04:37 PM

		 To: insights@cera.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: California's Desperate Attempts to Avoid a Rate Increase - CERA
Alert

Title: California's Desperate Attempts to Avoid a Rate Increase
URL: http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2241

California,s Desperate Attempts to Avoid a Rate Increase

On February 1, 2001, the California Assembly approved and the California
governor signed a new law intended to secure power supplies for California.
The
legislature has been meeting since early January in a &special extraordinary
session8 to address the power market crisis in the state, and the new law
represents their first significant piece of legislation. The bill, AB 1,
establishes a new mechanism for purchasing power for the state,s businesses
and
consumers. Whether the mechanism works will depend chiefly on whether the
limited revenue source used to pay for the power*collected by the state,s
investor-owned utilities (IOUs) under current retail rates*will cover
wholesale
power market costs incurred by the state. The law reflects the obsession by
California lawmakers with avoiding a rate increase rather than focusing on the
underlying flaws in California,s market structure.

AB 1 ushers in several important changes to the California market structure.
It
also contains several key provisions that capture the political mood in the
state. Highlights of the bill include

* Power buying authority transferred. The responsibility for purchasing power
for the customers of California,s IOUs has been transferred to the California
Department of Water Resources (CDWR). The California utilities will continue
to
operate and schedule their remaining generating facilities and contracts. The
difference between the utilities, total load and the sum of their resources
(referred to as the utilities, &net short8 amount) will be supplied by CDWR,
an
amount of energy that varies between 5,000 and 25,000 megawatts (MW),
depending
on the time of year, time of day, and utility plant availability. The
utilities
most recently performed this function themselves, buying energy from the
California Power Exchange (PX). However, CDWR has been buying electricity on
behalf of the IOUs since mid-January, when the near-bankruptcy of Southern
California Edison (SCE) and Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) threatened to
disrupt
supplies to their customers. CDWR is a state agency that manages water
reservoirs and transportation systems in the state. CDWR uses an enormous
amount of electricity to transport water across California and provides
critical load-shedding capability to the independent system operator (ISO). In
addition, CDWR,s reservoirs generate power. The CDWR is thus well integrated
in
the state,s electric grid but in the past has not executed large, complicated
energy purchase arrangements to supply the customers of California,s
utilities.

* Portfolio of transactions. The intent of AB 1 is to allow CDWR to execute a
portfolio of contracts to stabilize the cost of power for the utilities and
their customers. CDWR has until January 2, 2003, to execute contracts. CDWR
will take title to power and is thereby not just acting as a clearinghouse. It
has issued a request for bids and seeks a variety of terms, including monthly,
annual, two-year, three-year, and longer. CDWR may also enter into options.
Thus, although CDWR,s role is intended to be temporary, the contracts that it
executes could extend many years.

* Power for munis. CDWR may purchase power on behalf of some California
municipal utilities at the municipal utilities, election.

* New payment scheme. CDWR will be entitled to a portion of existing utility
rates to pay for the cost of purchased power, interest on bonds, and
administrative expenses. This payment stream will be equal to the difference
between the generation component currently embedded in utility retail rates
(averaging about $0.07 per kilowatt-hour [kWh]) and the utilities,
costs to run
their own generation plants, costs of bilateral and qualifying facility
contracts, and the costs of ancillary services. The CDWR share of retail rates
is referred to as the California Purchase Adjustment (CPA). It is not clear
whether the CPA will cover wholesale power market costs. Current prices for
multiyear power contracts may lie above the CPA. In addition, if investors
believe that the CPA is inadequate to cover costs, the entire program may be
abandoned.

* New bonds. Bonds will be issued to secure power. The total amount of bonds
issued may not exceed four times the CPA. The state will transfer $500 million
from the general fund to jump-start the program, which begins immediately.
This
seed money and all bond proceeds must be recovered by CDWR from the California
utilities, customers (and municipal utilities if they opt in).

* New residential rate freeze. The California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC) is prohibited from increasing residential customer rates until it has
completed paying all outstanding obligations. This locks in the recent 9
percent residential rate increase indefinitely. Governor Gray Davis thus keeps
his pledge not to increase rates further.

* Retail competition. To help secure a stable payment stream for the new
bonds,
AB 1 enables the CPUC to prohibit the utilities, retail customers from
choosing
an alternative electricity provider until CDWR,s obligations are paid.
Although
the CPUC has yet to act on this, the action would effectively halt the
competitive retail markets in the state for the duration of the CDWR program.

* Taxpayer protection. AB 1 directs that the new bonds clearly state &[
n]either
the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the State of California is
pledged
to the payment of the principal of or interest on this bond.8 Thus, the bonds
are secured only by the payment stream from utility rates.

*No assets affected. The CDWR is granted neither ownership nor control of
utility assets.

Ironically, the authority now granted CDWR is what California utilities had
essentially requested last summer when they sought to stabilize electricity
prices by executing a portfolio of transactions. The utilities were never
provided sufficient authority to execute term contracts. In addition, the
utilities have more experience to perform this function than CDWR.

Rather than aligning retail rates with wholesale electricity prices,
California
has sidestepped the issue by simply transferring the electricity purchasing
function. SCE and PG&E are still left to contend with uncollected costs from
past energy purchases, although they will no longer incur costs associated
with
buying power in the current wholesale market while charging frozen retail
rates. The utility liquidity crisis has not been resolved.

It is not clear whether the law,s prohibition on rate increases for
residential
customers can be achieved. The law is silent on rate increases for commercial
and industrial customers, providing a potential path for recovering
higher-than-
expected costs. Alternatively, CDWR could conceivably find contracts of
sufficient duration and low enough price that the rate pledge is met. These
contracts would lock in today,s retail rates for a long period of time.

AB 1 is just one of the steps that state officials hope will restore the power
system in California to a more stable footing. Key tasks remain.

* California,s wholesale market structure, which helped cause the supply
crisis
by ensuring that it was not profitable or possible to build generation in
California, remains unchanged. The term contracts CDWR is likely to sign will
provide a mechanism for mainly existing generators to lay off risk but will
not
be sufficient to encourage the build of sufficient new facilities. In
addition,
California,s siting and permitting process remains largely unchanged.

* The state must still address the need to expedite the development of new
power plants.

* AB 1 does not provide for the recovery of uncollected past wholesale energy
costs of California,s utilities. The state has been negotiating a deal with
the
utilities that may involve the transfer of generation or transmission assets
to
the state. However, the utilities have achieved recent court victories that
may
pave the way to a court-directed recovery of these costs. Recent audits
indicate that SCE and PG&E recovered their stranded costs early in 2000, which
should have triggered an end to their respective rate freezes. A legal
showdown
between the utilities and the state on this issue may be inevitable.

**end**

Follow above URL for full report.

*********************************************************
Come Shoot the Rapids with us at CERAWeek2001, "Shooting the Rapids:
Strategies and Risks for the Energy Future" in Houston, February 12-16, 2001!
For more information and to register, please visit
http://www20.cera.com/ceraweek/
*********************************************************

E-mail Category: Alert
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Western Energy,

**********************************************************************
To make changes to your cera.com account go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www20.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Hello Girls!

I am getting so excited about Caycie's Bachelorette Party!  I hope everyone
has marked their calendars for the weekend of March 1-3.

Ann has graciously offered her house in Wimberly for the weekend.  What I
wanted to find out is... when do you think you could come in?  Would it be
more fun for everyone to come to Austin (at various times) and hang out at
Caycie's house?  Then everyone could caravan together to Ann's place on
Saturday morning?  Or would it be better for everyone to find their way to
Ann's at whatever time they can make it on Friday night?

The tentative plan is for us to have a lingere shower on Saturday during
lunch or in the afternoon and then go to Salt Lick on Saturday night for
dinner.

Let me know what you think and what your schedule permits.

Thanks,
Lisa


We invoiced Mirant Americas for deal 705989 and they do not see the deal in their system.  It was for 5,000/day from 4/1 - 4/2 at 5.10 on PG&E Texas.  Can you tell me who you did this deal with at Mirant?

Megan