A helpful FERC order as we work on asset management deals:

New Horizon Electric Cooperative Inc. v. Duke Power Company, EL00-101-001.
Order on Rehearing. Order issued October 11, 2000 addressing a complaint by
New Horizon Electric Cooperative, Inc (New Horizon) against Duke Power Co.
(Duke) seeking FERC resolution of four disputed issues, including treatment
of energy imbalances not prevented by dynamic scheduling. New Horizon's
complaint claimed that energy imbalance service does not apply to it, since
it will employ dynamic scheduling to effectively remove its load from Duke's
control area. Further, New Horizon maintained that any deviation between the
dynamic schedule and the actual metered delivery of energy constituted
inadvertent interchange energy (which is the net difference between actual
and scheduled interchange energy between two control areas) and proposed that
any differences would be returned in-kind within two hours. On November 9,
New Horizon filed a request for rehearing or clarification of the October 11
Order. Order issued February 26 granting New Horizon's request for rehearing
or clarification of the October 11 Order. Order clarifies that, to the extent
dynamic scheduling by New Horizon operates successfully; New Horizon should
not be subject to charges under Duke's Schedule 4 Energy Imbalance Service.
In such circumstances, any imbalances between energy deliveries on behalf of
New Horizon and New Horizon's load should be accounted for by Duke as
inadvertent interchanges only. In addition, Order directed parties to
negotiate in good faith to establish a standard for the successful operation
of dynamic scheduling.


Sally,

Congrats on your new job. Sounds like you will be very busy per Rick's memo.
Good luck.


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2000 05:00
PM ---------------------------

"JERUSSALMY, ALEXANDRE" <AJERUSSALMY@bkb.com> on 04/17/2000 11:35:02 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: Brazil Trends - April 2000

Please find attached the latest version of BankBoston's Brazil Trends (in
English and in Portuguese).

Our best regards.

>  <<cleani.doc>>  <<cleanp.doc>>
>  English  Portuguese

 - cleani.doc
 - cleanp.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001
03:12 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jason Sokolov                           03/09/2001 08:49 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Additional e-mail addresses

Vince,

three new students gave me their e-mails:

wooddy@rice.edu, lamas@rice.edu, tbalestrery@houston.rr.com

Jason


Please send me any proposed form changes to  any of our forms, but
particularly, the ISDA and CSA Schedules and our omnibus forms so that I can
circulate a mark-up for everyone's review.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


OK

Vince J Kaminski
01/17/2000 12:46 PM
To: Elizabeth Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Resume

Elizabeth,

Please, include Jim Fallon on the list.

Vince

	From:  Elizabeth Grant                           01/17/2000 09:39 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Resume

Will do!

- Elizabeth

Vince J Kaminski
01/17/2000 08:21 AM
To: Elizabeth Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, James B
Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Resume

Elizabeth,

I would like to bring this guy in, not necessarily to hire him,
though it's a possibility, but mostly to find out what Cinergy is doing.
We should include some power traders and originators in the interview list.
Grant Masson can give you some hints.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2000
08:17 AM ---------------------------

marshall.brown@robertwalters.com on 01/14/2000 02:48:42 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Resume

Vince,
Hope all is well.  This candidate would be interested in talking with you .
Regards,
Marshall Brown
Robert Walters Associates
212-704-0596

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

**********************************************************************
 - yu_hai.doc


Stephen Bennett, professional meteorologist, was hired into the Research
group in September of this year as a Specialist based on salary alignment
criteria.  In retrospect, and upon review, he should have been hired on as a
Senior Specialist.

After coming on board. it rapidly became apparent that Stephen was clearly an
"under hire."  He is well-deserving of an immediate promotion (really more of
a correction) and pay raise, to be made retroactive at least to the 1st of
this month. This memo outlines the circumstances surrounding this hiring
error and provides detailed justifications for this retroactive "promotion."

At the time of the interview process, there was no position in Enron
designated as "Professional Meteorologist."  In fact, the most recent similar
hire prior to that date was Jose Marquez, also a professional meteorologist,
who was hired in, based on salary alignment criteria, as a manager.  While
functionally, both these men are meteorologists, Enron has no such job
classification. Compounded by the urgency in bringing on additional
professional expertise in short time order, it was difficult to peg the
proper Enron classification appropriate for this new position.  This original
uncertainty and resulting misplacement of Stephen into the Specialist
category, rather than the Senior Specialist category, needs to be corrected
at this time.

Although a "new-hire" to Enron, Stephen Bennett has extensive work
experience.  He has worked as a professional meteorologist at both the
Weather Services Corporation in Boston and at The Weather Channel in
Atlanta.  He came to Enron well-referenced by both those organizations,
needing no further training and only minimal supervision.

Once aboard here in Houston, Stephen immediately demonstrated the core Enron
values with our unique sense of urgency.  After only a week, he assumed
responsibilities normally reserved for someone actually at even a manager
level - he was assigned and fully took over the critical afternoon weather
briefings to the gas traders.  This includes analysis and report preparation
as well as presentation.  Also in the presentation arena, he now regularly
briefs various desks in the morning and throughout the day.  Stephen is a
master of communication and particularly adept at conveying what through
other messengers might otherwise seem confusing or ambiguous.

Stephen has also demonstrated an unusually high level of self-initiative.  He
designed, implemented, and now maintains several sub-sites on the Research
web page which he tailored to various customers - in specific: the weather
derivatives team, the agricultural team, and most recently, the crude and
liquids team.  I have recently assigned Stephen to spearhead our conversion
and major upgrade of this web page.

These above described accomplishments are above and beyond Stephen,s regular
duties which include starting work at 5 am daily, reliably and without fail,
to assemble and prepare our trader,s weather report.  Recently, with the
advent of extended hours for both NYMEX and EnronOnline, Stephen voluntarily
on his own accord, assists in our new Sunday weather support effort.  As his
supervisor, fully cognizant of his already standard 50+ hour work week, I do
not solicit, but readily accept, this above and beyond expectations
assistance.

In review, the circumstance which resulted in this under hire condition was
Enron,s immediate need for a non-standard, fairly unique professional - a
meteorologist, coupled with Stephen,s desire to work for our company in spite
of the absence of a hierarchy which included the exact entitled professional
title reflecting his chosen career path..  Once hired, Stephen has clearly
demonstrated through contribution and performance that he is well-deserving
of this immediate and retroactive promotion.


Chris,

I appreciate you forwarding this information to the appropriate people.  Now
I really owe you lunch.  let me know when you are available.

Thanks Again, Tom Clark

office 713-371-6766
home 713-864-0193
e-mail tom.clark@et.pge.com

 <<Tom Clark ResumeIII.doc>>

PG&E Energy Trading and any other company referenced herein which uses the
PG&E name or logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and Electric
Company, the California utility.  These companies are not regulated by the
California Public Utilities Commission, and customers do not have to buy
products from these companies in order to continue to receive quality
regulated services from the utility.
 - Tom Clark ResumeIII.doc


Start Date: 4/19/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041917.txt


The following erratas to the testimony filed by Cities of Glendale and Burbank on November 6, 2001 will be filed with the Commision today.

Jon Stickman

 - EL00-95-045 Burbank Indiv Errata ltr.doc
 - EL00-95-045 Burbank Indiv Scheuerman Testimony Rnd 1 Errata pgs.doc
 - EL00-95-045 Glendale Indiv Errata ltr.doc
 - EL00-95-045 Glendale Indiv Scheuerman Testimony Rnd 1 Errata pages.doc
 - Exh No GLN-2 Errata 11-26-01.xls
 - Exh No BUR-2 Errata 11-26-01.xls
 - EL00-95-045 Burbank Indiv Scheuerman Testimony Rnd 1 Errata certif.doc


Di's Nasties (8 pts) lead Jester's Molesters (0 pts)
Joe Stepenovitch (0 pts) tied F-Bombs (0 pts)
Quieres su papa? (12 pts) lead GassHoles (11 pts)
El Mariachi (4 pts) lead SOMFAW (0 pts)
Chihuaha This (33 pts) lead DAWG MAWLERS (0 pts)
Gore's Gangstas (24 pts) lead Chum Runners (0 pts)
BlitzKrieg (0 pts) tied Chihuaha That (0 pts)

The weekly report is available:
http://fflnet.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/weekly?L=0205&W=7

Natural Gas Gridiron Address:
http://fflnet.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/home/0205

Questions about this site?  Check out our FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)
at http://www.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/support_faq.html
or our detailed on-line help at
http://www.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/coach.html


Unplanned Losses - ($1942.41)
Static Sch Fees - $374.00

Total - ($1568.41)

ERCOT Sch Fees - $418.00


I really really want to get out of here.  I was just told by my admin. that when I get here at 6:45 am that Renee gets in a little after me and is watching me, so I need to be careful of what I do.  What do they think I do play around.  This makes me so mad, I could scream.


Per the documents below that were sent to you on October 10th regarding Enron's RTO positions, please DO NOT DISTRIBUTE them.  Unfortunately, there were factual errors that were not identified until today.

I will send everyone a replacement set next week.

Thank you and I apologize for the confusion.

Janel

-----Original Message-----
From: Guerrero, Janel
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 6:10 PM
To: McVicker, Maureen
Subject: Enron RTO positions

Attached are five documents which articulate Enron's position on various RTO issues.  Each document is short (no more than 5 pages) and can be used as talking points, or handouts in your meetings with policy makers.

If you have previous drafts of these documents, please replace them with the attached FINAL versions.

If you have questions about these documents or suggestions for future topics, please contact me with your ideas.

Thank you.

Janel Guerrero
713-853-9104

RTO Documents

Fewer is Better (economic and reliability arguments which support FERC RTO model)
Security/Reliability (industry changes/drivers which call for renewed commitment to reliability)
Q&A (general FAQs addressing RTOs)
Natural Markets (explanation of physical flows of electricity which justify FERC RTO model)
Chronology (history of FERC actions leading up to Chairman Wood's comments on September 26)


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001 09:24 AM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	03/20/2001 05:50 PM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (01-98) NYMEX Holdings, Inc. Chairman of the Board & Board of
Directors Results

Notice No. 01-98
March 20, 2001

TO:
All Exchange Members

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
NYMEX Holdings, Inc. Chairman of the Board & Board of Directors Results

The shareholders of the NYMEX Holdings, Inc., and the New York Mercantile
Exchange, Inc., today elected Vincent Viola by a margin of 476 to 115 as
chairman of the board and the following individuals to other positions on the
Exchange board of directors: Gordon Rutledge, Madeline Boyd, Gary Rizzi, J.
Robert Collins, Kenneth Garland, Robert Steele, and Harley Lippman.

A resolution was also passed, by a vote of 469 for and 84 against, to add
three equity holder representative positions to the board. An election for
these positions will be scheduled shortly.

Mr. Viola, vice chairman of the Exchange from 1993 to 1996, is the founder
and sole owner of Pioneer Futures, Inc., which is currently a clearing member
of both divisions of the New York Mercantile Exchange, and the New York Board
of Trade. Mr. Viola also served on the Exchange board in the at-large
category from 1987 to 1990 He is a graduate of the United States Military
Academy at West Point and achieved the rank of major in the United States
Army Reserves. In 1983, he graduated from New York Law School with a juris
doctor degree.

In 1988, Mr. Viola formed the First Bank Group which operates community banks
in Dallas and the surrounding Texas area. In 1998, he formed MV Technologies,
a developer of fully integrated electronic platforms for trading futures,
options, equities, and derivatives.

Mr. Viola co-founded and was chairman of the National Children,s Educational
Reform Foundation, which is dedicated to the fundamental reform and
improvement of inner-city education with an emphasis on bi-lingual programs
in immigrant communities. Mr. Viola has served on the West Point Fund
committee, an arm of the board of trustees which supports academy cadet
programs. In 1997, Mr. Viola received a man-of-the-year award from the Eden
School for Autistic Children. In 1998, Mr. Viola was awarded the Ellis Island
Medal of Honor by the National Ethnic Coalition of Organizations. In 2000, he
was honored with the community service award from the Futures and Options for
Kids charitable organization.

Mr. Rutledge was elected as the board representative in the floor broker
category. Mr. Rutledge, who is co-founder and owner of Onyx Brokerage Inc.,
has been a floor broker on the Exchange since 1981, after working for Merrill
Lynch as a newswire editor and technical analyst. Prior to starting Onyx, he
also worked for MercOil and J. Tafaro Brokerage. He serves on the membership,
technology, arbitration, adjudication, floor broker advisory, and political
action committees. Mr. Rutledge has a bachelor of arts cum laude from Harvard
University.

Ms. Boyd was elected as the local representative to the board. Ms. Boyd has
been the at-large representative to the board for the past three years and a
member of the executive committee for the past year. She has traded gasoline
for her own account for more than 16 years. She is has been chairman of the
NYMEX Charitable Foundation since 1992 and is also co-chairman of the local
advisory committee and the petroleum products advisory committee, and a
member of the coal advisory committee. She also serves as a director of the
Commodity Floor Brokers and Traders Association and Futures and Options for
Kids and holds a bachelor of science in business from Fairleigh Dickinson
University.

Mr. Rizzi was reelected for the third time as a futures commission merchant
(FCM) representative to the board. In addition to serving on the board for
the past six years, Mr. Rizzi has served two terms on the executive
committee, including the past year. He has been a member of the floor
community for 22 years. After working for Dean Witter for a year as a clerk,
Mr. Rizzi joined A.G. Edwards and became floor manager in 1982. He has been
an officer of the company and a conferring member of the Exchange for 17
years. He is also a member of the COMEX Division and both divisions of the
New York Board of Trade. He is the chairman of the membership, FCM advisory,
and technology committees and vice chairman of the facilities committee.

J. Robert (Bo) Collins, Jr., ran unopposed to fill the trade slot. Mr.
Collins is senior vice president of natural gas trading at El Paso Merchant
Energy, a division of El Paso Energy Corporation, the largest pipeline
operator and the third largest producer of natural gas in North America. Mr.
Collins directs the natural gas derivatives portfolio. Before joining El Paso
in 1997, Mr. Collins was a natural gas and crude oil options market-maker
with Pioneer Futures on the Exchange trading floor. A graduate of Texas A&M
University, his first professional experience was in commercial banking with
the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank.

Mr. Collins has been a member of the Exchange since 1995 and has served on
the options advisory committee since 1996.

Mr. Garland was elected to his first term as the at-large representative to
the board. After receiving a masters degree in audiology from Long Island
University, Mr. Garland worked as a private and industrial audiologist for
eight years. He began trading at the New York Mercantile Exchange for his own
account in 1981. In 1982 and 1983, he also acted as a floor broker. Since
purchasing his seat in 1983, he has exclusively traded for his own account,
concentrating most of his time in the gasoline ring. He is vice chairman of
the Exchange floor and settlement committees; panel chairman on the
arbitration and adjudication committees; and also serves on the following
committees: membership; local advisory; and petroleum product advisory. Mr
Garland was also recommended by the Exchange in 1994 to represent it on the
National Futures Association membership appeals subcommittee, a position he
continues to hold to this day.

Mr. Steele and Mr. Lippman were elected to three-year terms as public
directors of the Exchange. Prior to the Exchange,s demutualization in
November 2000, the public directors were appointed by the board and served
two year terms.

Mr. Steele served as a public director of the Exchange from 1988 to 1994, and
was re-appointed to the board in 1999. He is vice chairman of John Ryan
Company, an international financial services marketing firm, and is director
of the Merlin Retail Financial Center in Stamford, Conn. He previously served
as president and chief executive officer of the Norwich (CT) Savings Society
from 1975 to 1981, and as president and chief executive officer of Dollar Dry
Dock Bank of New York from 1985 to 1990.

Mr. Steele was a U.S. congressman (Second District, Conn) from 1970 to 1974,
and was the Republican candidate for governor of Connecticut in 1974. While
in Congress , he served on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, was the
ranking minority member of the Latin American subcommittee, and chaired or
co-chaired Congressional task forces on international drug trafficking and
problems of the aging. Following Congress, he was appointed chairman of the
Social Security committee of the White House conference on aging. In addition
to the Exchange, Mr. Steele serves on the board of directors of SmartServ
Online (web and wireless transaction platform services provider), Scan
Optics, Inc. (document processing systems and information management
solutions), and NLC Insurance Companies. He is also chairman of the board of
Moore Medical Corp. He served as a Soviet affairs specialist in the Central
Intelligence Agency from 1963 to 1968. He was a visiting lecturer in
government at the United!
 S!
tates Coast Guard Academy and is the recipient of an honorary doctor of laws
degree from Sacred Heart University in Connecticut.

Mr. Lippman is a major contributor to Feed The Children, sponsoring their
Christmas event in Harlem in December 2000. He also serves on the advisory
board of the Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs.
He is a member of the Information Technology Association of America and a
former trustee of The Washington Institute. He is also active politically as
a fund-raiser for both the Republican and Democratic parties, including
hosting fund-raising events at his home.

Last week, Michael Devaney was elected to replace John Moore as chairman of
the COMEX governors committee, a two-year term in which he will head the
committee which advises the board on matters uniquely pertinent to COMEX
Division members. In that capacity he will attend all Exchange board meetings
to represent the views of the COMEX Division members.

Mr. Devaney has served as vice chairman of the COMEX governors committee for
the past two-and-a-half years; has served on the governors committee since
1994; and has been a member of the Exchange since 1985. He is the owner of
Great Lakes, Inc., an independent floor brokerage operation, and has served
on the Exchange membership, floor, facilities, business conduct, compliance
review, marketing, margin, political action, and rules committees.

Editor,s note: There will be a press luncheon to meet Mr. Viola at 1:30 PM,
Wednesday, March 21, on the 10th floor of the New York Mercantile Exchange
headquarters, One North End Avenue.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdoc
=(01-98)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Dear Susan:

Welcome to The Knot. We are sending you this email to confirm your membership
and let you know about some of the features on the site that might be of
specific interest to you, whether you're planning your own wedding, helping a
friend, or you just consider yourself a wedding enthusiast.

-- ULTIMATE WEDDING CHECKLIST
http://www.theknot.com/checklist

-- WEB PAGE BUILDER
http://www.theknot.com/weddingwebpage

-- WEDDING GOWN GALLERY -- over 20,000 gown pics!
http://www.theknot.com/bridalsearch

-- BUDGET CALCULATOR
http://www.theknot.com/budgeter

-- THE "WEDDINGS A-Z" SITE INDEX
http://www.theknot.com/index

We're always here to take suggestions, hear your gripes, or help you out with
specific advice, so feel free to email us any time at suggestions@theknot.com
or CALL US TOLL FREE 1-888-933-KNOT (1-888-933-5668).

x o x o x o x o x o x o x o x o x o x o x o x o x

For your records, here is your account information:
Email Address (login): sscott5@enron.com
Password: **********
(Forgotten your password? Go to http://www.theknot.com/password.html or go to
http://www.theknot.com and click "update profile" to create a new one!)

NOTE: The Knot uses cookies to store membership information, so as long as
you have your browser set to always accept cookies and you are on your own
computer, you will not need to log in. However, you are welcome to use any
computer to access your Knot information -- to log in, just visit
http://www.theknot.com/login

x o x o x o x o x o x o x o x o x o x o x o x o x

Best wishes,

Carley Roney
Editor-in-Chief
The Knot, the #1 wedding resource & gift registry

http://www.theknot.com  AOL keyword: weddings

To UNSUBSCRIBE: You have received this email because you have given
TheKnot.com your email address and requested to receive email updates and
newsletters. If you'd like to be removed from our mailing list, simply go to
the following url and update your email preferences:
http://www.theknot.com/profile

If you did not subscribe to Knot mailings when you became a member, you will
not receive any further email from us.


river trip sounded like a blast!  the pool is going well - next step is the
deck and they are starting this week -- realistically they could be done in 3
weeks.  pat got a job  - thank goodness - he starts next thursday -- he'll be
working downtown at waste management.  it was a pretty good offer -- good
benefits -- good company -- he's going to be working for the old boss that he
had at bank united.  we will be able to carpool now - no more bussing it for
me -- also, we just found out today that we got into the new enron child care
center -- that was a big relief.  so -- things continue to fall into place --
we're keeping our fingers crossed that it continues...


Dear Clients and Friends:

   Attached is this week's brief update summary on the political outlook in
Washington for energy issues.  Please feel free to call Tobyn or me for
additional details.

  Best regards,

  Merribel

 - Washington Outlook in Light of Terrorist Attacks 9-21-01.doc


FYI.  The Times finally ran the story.  Should add to Davis' migraines.  Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.  The pressure on the contracts is likely to heat up.
Best,
Jeff
8 State Power Contracts Seen as Bad Deals
Energy: The long-term pacts require the purchase of too much electricity at too high a price for too long, a study finds. Immediate renegotiation is urged.
By VIRGINIA ELLIS and NANCY VOGEL
Times Staff Writers

September 30 2001

SACRAMENTO -- At least eight of the long-term contracts to buy electricity that California officials signed this year are so egregious that they should immediately be renegotiated, according to a new, detailed study.

The biggest problems are so-called "take or pay" clauses that require the state to buy large quantities of expensive power even if there is no demand for it, the study said.

The contracts will saddle Californians with high electricity rates for the next decade because the state negotiated many deals that require the purchase of too much energy at too high a price, according to the analysis, which was sponsored by a coalition of consumer, environmental and renewable energy groups.

Between January and September, the state Department of Water Resources entered into 53 agreements to buy electricity for customers of the state's three investor-owned utilities, which have been unable to buy power on their own. The longest of the contracts would last 20 years, and overall, the pacts are estimated to cost $43 billion over the next two decades.

Power generators did not rule out the possibility of renegotiating at least some contracts, but said any move to do so would have to be requested by the state.

"If we receive a request and it makes sense for both parties to restructure the contracts, we will consider it," said Joe Ronan, a senior vice president for San Jose-based Calpine Corp. But, he said, the company has "no intention of asking for renegotiation" on its own.

Jan Smutny-Jones, executive director of the Independent Energy Producers, a trade association for electricity generating companies, said other members of his group might also consider renegotiation. So far, he said, "I don't see any realistic legislative or regulatory efforts to push it in that direction."

And he said the producers would oppose any efforts to force them back to the bargaining table. "We'd take strong exception to involuntary renegotiations," he said.

For his part, Gov. Gray Davis would be open to renegotiations, said his spokesman, Steve Maviglio, but only if power generators show a willingness to return to the bargaining table.

"Would we love to get a better deal?" Maviglio said. "Of course we would, but the contracts we negotiated helped us get in the positive position we are in now, and if the generators were willing to renegotiate the contracts, we'd be the first ones at the table."

S. David Freeman, who led the contract talks last winter on behalf of the state, said critics miss the larger purpose of the agreements. When the state began negotiating contracts, California had just suffered two days of rotating blackouts. The contracts tamed the market and eliminated the blackout threat, he said.

"Insurance is insurance, and it costs a little bit," said Freeman, "but it's a good thing to have."

But William B. Marcus, chief economist for JBS Energy, which conducted the three-month study, noted that at least one of the most troublesome agreements was signed in July--weeks after the market had stabilized and prices had declined.

The study of the contracts was sponsored by the Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies and was financed by a $200,000 grant from the San Francisco-based Energy Foundation. It was conducted by JBS, a consulting group.

The study singled out for criticism:

* A deal with Sempra Energy, parent company to San Diego Gas & Electric, which Marcus called the most expensive and inflexible of all the contracts. Over the life of the pact, he calculated, Sempra would earn $1.2 billion more than the California Energy Commission estimates unregulated power should cost.

The contract lasts until 2011. For each year, it requires the state to buy large amounts of power at fixed prices whether it's needed or not.

* A deal to buy electricity from small Northern California power plants owned by Calpine Co. that have yet to be built. The plants will be "peakers," designed to run in short bursts when electricity supplies are tight, such as on hot summer afternoons. The state agreed to pay Calpine $90 million a year for five years simply for the right to buy 495 megawatts of electricity.

"They get $90 million a year on plants that cost $250 million," said Marcus. "That's huge. You get your money out in three years. If a utility had built these power plants, they would have charged half as much."

* A deal with Alliance-Colton LLC to buy the output of two inefficient peaker power plants in San Bernardino County. The deal commits the state to pay $207 million through 2010 whether or not it uses any of the 72 megawatts of electricity.

* An agreement to pay $150 per megawatt-hour for two years--more than twice the average price of $69 per megawatt-hour of all the contracts--for power from several aging plants that Mirant Corp. of Atlanta owns in the San Francisco Bay Area.

* A contract the state signed in July to buy power from Pacificorp, a private utility based in Portland, Ore. Pacificorp agreed to sell electricity at a fixed price of $70 per megawatt-hour. That price could have looked reasonable at the height of last winter's crisis, but it was double what energy sold for when the contract was signed.

* Contracts with two power marketing companies for electricity generated by the same Southern California plants. The difference in price shows what a poor deal the state got under one of the contracts, the study said.

One of the marketers, Allegheny Energy Supply Co., agreed to sell from 150 to 1,000 megawatts from March 2001 to December 2011 for a straight $61 per megawatt-hour.

But a second marketer, Williams Energy Marketing & Trading Co. got a nine-year contract to sell from 35 to 600 megawatts from the same plants for $62.50 to $87 per megawatt-hour.

"When you compare those two contracts," Marcus said, "you know you've got a dog here. I think Williams showed up earlier, and the state was desperate."

* An agreement with Dynegy Corp. of Houston that requires the state to pay for emissions credits and upgrading of pollution control equipment on the firm's California-based plants. The contract puts no ceiling on those costs, Marcus said, and it is unclear how high they are likely to go.

* A pact to buy electricity from a plant being built in Victorville by a partnership between Inland Energy of Newport Beach and Constellation Power Development of Baltimore. The state agreed to a price of $58 per megawatt-hour, but is obligated to take all of the power, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Marcus, a Harvard-trained economist who has 23 years of experience with electricity and gas utility issues, said the brunt of the financial pain from the contracts will not be felt by consumers until after the next election, when the pacts significantly increase the amount of power the state buys. He said 96% of all the electricity purchased under the contracts becomes available--much of it on a take or pay basis--after next summer.

Those large power buys will come when the state is expected to have energy surpluses because of increasing supply and a decline in demand driven by higher prices.

"The state has agreed to buy too much power, often for too long a period, at too high a price, and much of this power is simply too dirty," said V. John White, executive director of the Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies. "To make matters worse, almost all of these contracts are dependent on one price-volatile fuel: natural gas."

When the state began negotiating contracts in January, electricity prices averaged $177 per megawatt-hour and sometimes spiked higher than $1,000 per megawatt-hour. By June, the average price had fallen below $100. Lately, prices hover around $30 per megawatt-hour, similar to the cost California enjoyed before prices went haywire.

Marcus was particularly critical of one element of the Pacificorp contract: a clause that prevents the state from taking advantage of the plummeting price of natural gas until after 2003. The price of natural gas, the main fuel used to run power plants in California, began to jump last fall but has plummeted since spring.

Another weakness of the contracts, Marcus said, is that they lock the state into further dependence on gas. For the prices California will pay under these pacts, residents could have made a greater investment in power generated by the sun, wind or other renewable sources for the same price or cheaper, he said.

Windmills and solar panels would help buffer against natural gas price spikes, he said. Renewable sources of power also don't release air pollution and gases that contribute to global warming, he added.

"I'm paying to buy something that really isn't the right thing to buy," Marcus said.

"I don't want to pay Williams $69 a megawatt-hour to generate lots of inefficient gas-fired power that I have to take that's going to increase global warming and increase pollution in the South Coast Air Basin."


Earlier this year, Enron filed an application for a Presidential Permit to build a 300 MW HVDC tie between Ercot and Mexico in the Brownsville area. The Permit has not yet been issued.

If the Permit is issued (as we expect), then the earliest construction could start would be sometime in the first quarter of next year.

I you need any further information, please let me know.

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:48 AM
To:	May, Tom; Forster, David; Tricoli, Carl
Subject:	FW: Merger Analysis - ERCOT Market Share
Importance:	High

We are trying to identify assets and contracted positions that Enron will either own or control in ERCOT to process the PUCT merger analysis.

If you have any information on existing or planned assets or positions please let me know.  If you want to discuss, please feel free to call me at 3x7673.

Thanks.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:03 PM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Ward, Charles; Portz, David
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	Merger Analysis - ERCOT Market Share
Importance:	High

I am trying to identify generation assets owned and/or controlled in ERCOT by Enron and its affiliates.

The information I have been provided is that Enron only has Ponderosa Pine Energy Partners LTD - 263 MW.  Is this correct?

Do we have any long-term capacity over the DC Tie?
Do we have any construction in progress?
Any other positions (e.g., Capacity Auction) that may be considered by the PUCT in the merger?

Is there anyone else I should talk with about this information?

Thanks,

Jim


Sara, the report is in o:\legal\cnelson\brokerage reports\BAS 062801.   This is a tentative update because I have not heard back from stephnie as to whether we have received certain executed copies back yet.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Cheryl
Sent:	Friday, June 29, 2001 10:27 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	FW: Updates for Brokerage List

fyi
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farrell, Keegan
Sent:	Thursday, June 28, 2001 3:32 PM
To:	Nelson, Cheryl
Subject:	RE: Updates for Brokerage List

Please excuse me for not replying sooner; the changes have been implemented.  The new document is BAS 062801.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Cheryl
Sent:	Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:53 PM
To:	Farrell, Keegan
Subject:	Updates for Brokerage List

K, I know we were waiting for Stephanie to get back to us but in the interim can you update the report -- create a new version to reflect the following changes:

SNL -- Comments have been sent.

CSFB -- we executed an agreement for not only ENA BUT ALSO ECT INVESTMENTS.

Let me know when these changes have been made so that I can decide whether to send out the agreement with or without any feedback from anyone else.

Thanx a lot.


Mary:  Thanks for the email.  No, I cannot use Ofelia on June 18 and I do not
want a substitute while she is gone.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Mary Ogden
	06/01/2001 04:27 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ofelia Q

Dear Sara:  Ofelia says that if you like, she can work for you on Monday,
June 18 since she won't be in town that Thursday, when she's supposed to work
for you.  Please advise if you'd like her to come on the 18th.

Please also advise if you'd like a sub while she's gone to Colombia.

Thanks,
Mary
x37796


A phone call was held today.  Some issues / actions from the call ---

1. Right now it appears that this would be announced around June 5 at the
Mayor's regular press meeting.  Checking this out.  Need to make sure that PR
will be able to cover the meeting and answer any background the press may
have on us.

2. Deal team wants Enron PR to meet with DEP PR next week (May 30?) to begin
working up the Mayor's statement on the benefits of this transaction.  Should
we have a Govt Affairs person at the meeting to pick up the "politics" of the
message?  Just a thought.

3. No one really wants to hire any outside PR support.  Everyone was
comfortable with Peggy and her team taking the lead.  Don't want to appear
that Enron is "selling" the deal.  The deal is good and we should let it
speak for itself.  Does everyone agree?

4. We are looking for a consultant  to support us on MWBE issues.  This
should be done (at least contracted) by June 1.

5. What have we told outside political support about this deal (eg, Piper,
Marbury)?  Sue Landwehr and Roy we need to make sure that you have some time
the week of June 5 to cover any political issues that may arise.  Can we
coordinate our schedules?

Thanks,

Jim


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001
03:15 PM ---------------------------
From: Patrick Mulvany/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/20/2001 03:11 PM
To: Andres Balmaceda/NA/Enron@ENRON, Anne Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amy
Cavazos/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kristen Clause/ENRON@enronXgate, Sherry
Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron, Carole Frank/NA/Enron@ENRON, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz
Hillman/Corp/Enron@Enron, George Huan/ENRON@enronXgate, Luchas
Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron, Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruce
Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ryan O'Rourke/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott L
PALMER/ENRON@enronxgate, Chance Rabon/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff
Royed/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Ryder/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth
Shim/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Kristine Best/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: broker changes

The broker Amerex is no longer under the short name of AMERX in deal
capture.  From this point on, the short name is AMERG, which stands for
Amerex Natural Gas, Ltd.  AMERX will now default to Amerex Petroleum, which
is incorrect.  Also, the broker Spectron is no longer SPECT.  The new short
name is SPECI, which stands for Spectron Energy, Inc.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks,

Patrick Mulvany


Thank you for your request. You will be notified by email when your request has been processed. You can check the progress of your request by clicking http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000070710&Page=MyReq.


This will serve as my confirmation.

"Dictionary.com Word of the Day Confirmation from Lyris ListManager"
<lyris-confirm-301289Q@lists.lexico.com> on 05/10/2001 03:51:59 PM
Please respond to "Dictionary.com Word of the Day Confirmation from Lyris
ListManager" <lyris-confirm-301289Q@lists.lexico.com>
To: susan.w.pereira@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Please Confirm Your Subscription to the Dictionary.com Word of the
Day

Welcome! Your confirmation is needed for your subscription to the
Dictionary.com Word of the Day mailing list.

To confirm your subscription, please reply to this message and our
automated service will add your address to our list.


> As of September 18, 2000, myHomeKey.com has a new office location:
>
> myHomeKey.com
> 511 Harrison Street
> San Francisco, CA 94105
> Main Phone: (415) 946-6200
> Main Fax: (415) 946-6210
>
> Direct Line for Mick Seidl, Chairman: (415) 946-6202
> Direct Line for Maria Barnet, Executive Assistant: (415) 946-6214
>
I have also sent this information via regular mail.  If you have any
questions or need further information, please feel free to contact me.

Maria Barnet
Executive Assistant
maria.barnet@myhomekey.com
(415) 946-6214
myHomeKey.com


Steve, per your request,
Here is a draft that addresses your question about external demand for
Enron's talent.
Information is still coming in from various sources but I wanted to show you
the direction this was taking so you can provide feedback. Thanks.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 04/27/2001
01:07 PM ---------------------------

"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org> on 04/27/2001 11:59:30 AM
To: <bhawkin@enron.com>, <bmerola@enron.com>, <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>,
<donna.fulton@enron.com>, <janelle.scheuer@enron.com>,
<jeff_brown@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>,
<ray.alvarez@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>, <sarah.novosel@enron.com>,
<tom.hoatson@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: California Order Proxy Price Calculation

MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
       Power Marketers Working Group

FROM: Joe Hartsoe, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Bob Reilley, Power Marketers Working Group Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy
            Mark Bennett, Senior Manager of Policy
            Erin Perrigo, Manager of Policy

DATE: April 27, 2001

RE: California Order Proxy Price Calculation

We have had an initial opportunity to review FERC's Order Establishing
Prospective Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the California Wholesale
Electric Markets and Establishing an Investigation of Public Utility Rates in
Wholesale Western Energy Markets, and will provide a more detailed summary
early next week.

However, questions have arisen as to the calculation of the proxy price when
a stage 1, 2 or 3 emergency is called.  In initial discussions with FERC
staff, we have determined that the price mitigation will work as follows:

For the following day, the ISO will publish at 8 a.m. an average of the daily
prices published in Gas Daily for all California delivery points, as well as
emissions costs.  The emissions costs will be calculated by the ISO using the
Cantor Fitzgerald Environmental Brokerage Service.  The marginal unit will
then be determined via the single price auction in the hour, and the ISO will
then take the previously submitted and confidential heat rate data and
multiply it by the posted average gas price and emissions costs for that hour
to determine the market clearing price.  The ISO will not be calculating an
estimated market-clearing price in advance.


I received a call from Cornbelt Electric saying that on January 28, they want to limit the H. P. at Hubbard to 6000 from 0900 to 1600 for alliant to do line maintenance.  I have passed this information on to Pat and Pierre and Pierre said he will take care of it for us.


Offer still good.  How goes things with the new beau?  Also, thanks for the
cooked meats.  They were delicious!

	"Patti Young" <pyoung@cliverunnells.com>
	02/26/2001 12:08 PM

		 To: "Tana Jones" <tana.jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Monday

Morning, Glory,

Hope you are doing well and had a good weekend.

I am still considering the MS 150 and wanted to know if your offer is still
good for borrowing your bicycle.  If you have changed your mind, it is no
big deal.  Promise!

Patti


FYI -- As a result of a discussion that I had earlier in the week with
Georgeanne...
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99 11:31 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Georgeanne Hodges                           12/30/99 09:09 AM

To: Sally Beck@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meetings with Commercial Teams

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99
09:08 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Faith Killen                           12/29/99 06:39 PM

To: Paula Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Nicholie/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meetings with Commercial Teams

Effective immediately, please invite your Energy Ops team representatives to
all future meetings with the Commercial teams.

Gas- Brent Price
Power- Kristin Albrecht
Emerging Ops- Scott Pleus
IR/FX/Equity- Sheila Glover
Paper- Jeff Harbert

In addition to communicating the purpose of the meeting, please deliver via
e-mail  the information to be reviewed prior to the meeting. This will enable
the Energy Ops representative to raise any concerns/issues he/she might have
prior to meeting with the commercial leads, and give us an opportunity to
address these in advance. Thanks.


Looks like the changes are relatively minor, but I feel better!
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/21/2000 03:40
PM ---------------------------

"William J. Harmon" <wjharmon@JonesDay.com> on 11/21/2000 02:51:55 PM
To: "Boyd J. Springer" <bjspringer@JonesDay.com>
cc: gregg.penman@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com

Subject: Re: Peoples Transaction

Attached is the "term sheet" with some suggested revisions (identified by
strikethrough and underlining).  We suggest that you simply call the "late
charges" interest rather than any other term.  This type of business
transaction is exempt from the usury statute in terms of any maximum rate
and thus it is best to make it clear that the late charge is "interest"
rather than something else.  The other changes I made were merely to
clarify the method of calculating the interest on overdue amounts.  I note
the the contract you provided does include a provision for interest on
overdue invoice amounts.  Under the contract, interest is the Citibank
prime rate.  I assume you will set this term sheet up as an amendment to
the agreement.
(See attached file: Payment Delay Term Sheet.doc)

Please contact us if there are any other questions.

Bill Harmon
wjharmon@jonesday.com
312-269-4160
Fax: 312-782-8585

                    Boyd J. Springer
                    Extension 54151      To:     Kay.Mann@enron.com
                                         cc:     gregg.penman@enron.com,
                    11/21/00 11:52         William J. Harmon/JonesDay@JonesDay
                    AM                   Subject:     Re: Peoples Transaction
                                           (Document link: William J. Harmon)

Kay: Bill Harmon from our office (312-269-4160) is reviewing the material
re deferred payment and will get back to you.

==========
The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains
information that may be confidential, be protected by the attorney-client
or other applicable privileges, or constitute non-public information.  It
is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by
replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Use,
dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
==========

==========
The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains
information that may be confidential, be protected by the attorney-client
or other applicable privileges, or constitute non-public information.  It
is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by
replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Use,
dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
==========

 - Payment Delay Term Sheet.doc


Hi Dede
Just wondering if you would be able to hit next week? How about Monday
(anytime anywhere) or Wednesday?  Also, I see that Shari has sent out CAISO
language which I have not yet reviewed.  Maybe we can also schedule a real
meeting on Monday to finalize.  Let me know if that works for you.  See ya.


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crudespread32.pdf
Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatspread32.pdf
Unleaded Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unleadspread32.pdf

Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack32.pdf
Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack32.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Total Trades for Day	  	 334

 	 EOL Trades for Day	  	 184

 	 ICE Trades	  	 51

 	 EPMI ICE Trades	  	 8

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 11/01/2001   To: 11/20/2001	  	 EnPower	 From: 11/01/2001   To: 11/20/2001
 	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH

 	 EPMI Long Term California	 582	 9,825,856	  	 EPMI Long Term California	 56	 2,013,529
 	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 306	 4,335,200	  	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 138	 3,635,854
 	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 378	 8,612,991	  	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 241	 16,728,723
 	 EPMI Short Term California	 1,508	 1,984,552	  	 EPMI Short Term California	 544	 1,243,338
 	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 872	 1,022,960	  	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 375	 638,357
 	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 1,112	 1,528,144	  	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 586	 2,306,551
 	 Real Time	 1,075	 27,475	  	 Real Time	 439	 38,577

 	 Grand Total	 5,833	 27,337,178	  	 Grand Total	 2,379	 26,604,929

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 11/20/2001   To: 11/20/2001	  	 EnPower	 From: 11/20/2001   To: 11/20/2001
 	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH

 	 EPMI Long Term California	 40	 834,000	  	 EPMI Long Term California	 0	 0
 	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 27	 376,000	  	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 20	 31,368
 	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 12	 140,800	  	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 4	 10,105
 	 EPMI Short Term California	 29	 39,904	  	 EPMI Short Term California	 35	 56,557
 	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 6	 7,400	  	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 19	 25,200
 	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 24	 24,600	  	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 40	 179,120
 	 Real Time	 46	 1,150	  	 Real Time	 31	 1,840

 	 Grand Total	 184	 1,423,854	  	 Grand Total	 149	 304,190

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 11/20/2001   To: 11/20/2001	  	 EOL Deals	 From: 11/20/2001   To: 11/20/2001
 	 Long Term West Management	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Short Term West BOM	 Total Deals	 Total MWH
 	 Daily	 0	 0	  	 Daily	 0	 0
 	 Month-to-Date EOL	 9	 2,200	  	 Month-to-Date EOL	 0	 0
 	 Enpower daily deals	 0	 0	  	 Enpower daily deals	 0	 0
 	 Month-to-Date Enpower	 2	 2,003	  	 Enpower daily deals	 0	 0

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 11/20/2001   To: 11/20/2001
 	 EPMI California Services	 Total Deals	 Total MWH
 	 Daily	 0	 0
 	 Month-to-Date	 0	 0
 	 Enpower daily deals	 0	 0

 	 ICE Volumes	 From: 11/20/2001   To: 11/20/2001
 	 Delivery Point	 Total MWH	 EPMI MWH	  Price

 	 Cob (OP, Next Day)	 1,000	 0	  $     18.00
 	 Mid C (HE 1700)	 50	 0	  $     18.00
 	 Mid C (P, Next Day)	 7,200	 0	  $     17.83
 	 Mid C (OP, Next Day)	 9,000	 0	  $     16.40
 	 Mid C (P, Dec-01)	 100,000	 0	  $     30.57
 	 Mid C (P, Mar-02)	 10,400	 0	  $     30.25
 	 Mid C (P, Jul-02)	 10,400	 0	  $     32.25
 	 Mid C (P, Sep-02)	 9,600	 0	  $     41.25
 	 Mid C (P, Q1 02)	 30,400	 0	  $     31.50
 	 Mid C (P, Q2 02)	 30,800	 0	  $     27.00
 	 NP-15 (HE 1000)	 50	 0	  $     22.25
 	 NP-15 (HE 1100)	 50	 0	  $     21.75
 	 NP-15 (HE 1200)	 50	 0	  $     21.75
 	 NP-15 (HE 1300)	 25	 0	  $     21.00
 	 NP-15 (HE 1600)	 25	 0	  $     19.00
 	 NP-15 (HE 1700)	 50	 50	  $     23.75
 	 NP-15 (HE 1800)	 50	 0	  $     22.88
 	 NP-15 (P, Next Day)	 12,800	 0	  $     22.31
 	 NP-15 (OP, Next Day)	 6,000	 0	  $     19.25
 	 NP-15 (P, Bal Month)	 2,000	 0	  $     25.25
 	 NP-15 (OP, Bal Month)	 1,600	 0	  $     20.50
 	 NP-15 (OP, Dec-01)	 8,600	 0	  $     26.00
 	 NP-15 (P, Dec-01)	 40,000	 0	  $     33.00
 	 Palo (HE 0900)	 25	 0	  $     17.00
 	 Palo (P, Next Day)	 16,800	 4,000	  $     19.99
 	 Palo (OP, Next Day)	 3,000	 1,000	  $     13.75
 	 Palo (P, Bal Month)	 10,000	 0	  $     22.50
 	 Palo (OP, Dec-01)	 8,600	 0	  $     18.75
 	 Palo (P, Dec-01)	 80,000	 0	  $     27.81
 	 Palo (P, Jan-02)	 31,200	 0	  $     30.57
 	 Palo (P, Mar-02)	 8,200	 0	  $     21.25
 	 Palo (P, May-02)	 20,800	 0	  $     34.38
 	 Palo (P, Jun-02)	 10,000	 0	  $     43.25
 	 Palo (P, Jul-02)	 10,400	 0	  $     55.00
 	 Palo (P, Aug-02)	 21,600	 0	  $     60.63
 	 Palo (P, Q3 02)	 92,400	 0	  $     55.08
 	 Palo (P, Q2 03)	 30,800	 0	  $     38.75
 	 Palo (P, Q3 03)	 61,600	 0	  $     57.38
 	 SP-15 (HE 1000)	 50	 0	  $     19.00
 	 SP-15 (HE 1100)	 25	 0	  $     21.00
 	 SP-15 (HE 1200)	 50	 0	  $     19.75
 	 SP-15 (HE 1300)	 50	 0	  $     21.38
 	 SP-15 (HE 1400)	 50	 0	  $     21.38
 	 SP-15 (HE 1700)	 50	 0	  $     21.38
 	 SP-15 (HE 1800)	 50	 50	  $     19.75
 	 SP-15 (HE 1900)	 50	 50	  $     23.25
 	 SP-15 (P, Next Day)	 28,800	 0	  $     22.75
 	 SP-15 (OP, Next Day)	 7,000	 0	  $      18.11
 	 SP-15 (P, Bal Month)	 4,000	 0	  $     24.75
 	 SP-15 (P, Dec-01)	 30,000	 0	  $     30.50
 	 SP-15 (P, Q1 02)	 60,800	 0	  $     32.25

 	 Grand Total	 816,550	 5,150	  $ 1,373.08


Peggy,

Friday (lunch, supper),  Sat (breakfast, lunch). One person.

Vince Kaminski

Peggy Davies <Peggy_Davies@baylor.edu> on 03/30/2000 04:21:36 PM
Please respond to Peggy Davies <Peggy_Davies@baylor.edu>
To: Andres Almazan <Andres.Almazan@bus.utexas.edu>, Murray Carlson
<carlsonm@mail.utexas.edu>, Kent Daniel <kent@kent.kellogg.nwu.edu>, Wayne
Ferson <Harper1@U.Washington.edu>, Denis Gromb <dgromb@MIT.EDU>, John Hund
<Jhund@mail.utexas.edu>, Narasimhan Jegadeesh <jegadees@uiuc.edu>, Cindy
Justice <Justice@enron.com>, Matthias Kahl <matthias.kahl@anderson.ucla.edu>,
Vince Kaminski <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>, Anthony Lynch
<alynch@debit.stern.nyu.edu>, Thomas Noe <tnoe@mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu>,
Robert Parrino <Parrino@mail.utexas.edu>, Manju Puri <puri@Stanford.EDU>,
Ehud Ronn <eronn@mail.utexas.edu>, Laura Starks <starks@mail.utexas.edu>,
Andrew Subra <subrahm@anderson.ucla.edu>, Steathis Tompaidis
<stathis.tompaidis@bus.utexas.edu>
cc:
Subject: Texas Finance Festival (URGENT Request)

TEXAS FINANCE FESTIVAL ATTENDEE
PLEASE RESPOND TO THE BELOW REQUEST ASAP

In preparing for the Texas Finance Festival, we are needing to finalize the
meal counts.  While we are excited about everyone coming, we do not want to
pay for meals (expensive ones by the way when on the Riverwalk in San
Antonio) if someone will not be in attendance.  Please indicate below the
meals you will be inattendance.  If you have family/significant others coming
with you, please indicate the total number including yourself.  Thanks for
your help.  Bill Petty

Number to attend
Friday lunch              Friday supper               Saturday
breakfast          Saturday lunch             Saturday supper

RFC822 header
-----------------------------------
Return-Path: <Bill_Petty@baylor.edu>
Received: from CCC_Petty (ccc-petty.baylor.edu [129.62.162.79])
by ccis01.baylor.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA21931
for <Peggy_Davies@baylor.edu>; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 14:35:32 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <200003302035.OAA21931@ccis01.baylor.edu>
Date: 30 Mar 00 14:34:59 -0600
From: Bill Petty <Bill_Petty@baylor.edu>
Subject: Texas Finacne Festival (URGENT Request)
To: Peggy Davies <Peggy_Davies@baylor.edu>
X-Mailer: QuickMail Pro 1.5.4 (Windows32)
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: Bill Petty <Bill_Petty@baylor.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-Ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ccis01.baylor.edu id
OAA21931
Status:

Peggy Davies
Administrative Assistant
Department of Finance, Insurance, & Real Estate
Hankamer School of Business
P.O. Box 98004
Waco, TX  76706
(254) 710-4774; FAX (254) 710-1092
Peggy_Davies@Baylor.edu


I saw Scott Dieball at Mr. Izzo's going away reception, and shared the happy
news that we voted unanimously for him to set up the next conference call.

Kay


I'm in Chicago again.  I return this afternoon.

DG


FUCH - it is great to hear from you.  How did you get my address?  What have
you been up to?

You won't believe it, but I am married(about 4 years) and have a son
Jackson(not named after Bo) that is 15 months old.  We finally sold our old
house and moved into a new one, that is about a mile south of my mom.
Everything is going great for us here.  We are enjoying our new Astros
ballpark, which happens to be named after my company.  Unfortunately, we are
not getting any free tickets(at least the little people aren't).

Where are you living?  Are your parents still in Auburn?  How about your
lovely sister?  I bet she is married with several children.  We go back to
Auburn every football season for about three games, if you are ever in town,
we will have to get together.

Clear Lake is having our ten year reunion this fall.  Should be fun.  I think
you and I are the only two from that school to ever go to Auburn.

Talk to you soon.
PLove


I am preparing a re-draft of a previous agreement for this Canadian company.
Credit terms default for Duke Guarantor is 25M/ 50M for Enron.  Triggering
event for both parties is 10M w/ 250 multiples.  Do you want to change
these?  It is my understanding we have guaranties in place.    Please advise
asap.

Thanks!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Get Jim Cramer's Real-Time Stock Picks and Premium-Level
Commentary Absolutely FREE for two weeks!  This detailed
trading information is not available on RealMoney.

http://sub.thestreet.com/c/go/XAAP/DEDM-exprd1?s=S961&D=XTSM

Dear Former Subscriber:

For years, the market's top journalists, money managers
and investors have looked to Jim Cramer for insightful
market commentary and analysis.

The only thing missing has been his stock picks.

But now, since breaking free from his top hedge fund, Cramer
is free to share his stockpicking secrets with the world,
and make trades for his own personal account.

And you can get these Premium Stock Picks delivered to
your email inbox absolutely FREE!

With your FREE two-week trial subscription to Jim Cramer's
Action Alerts PLUS, you'll get Jim Cramer's Real-Time stock
picks and Premium-Level investment insight that you won't find
anywhere else including on RealMoney.

Click here for your FREE two-week trial subscription to Jim
Cramer's Action Alerts PLUS:

http://sub.thestreet.com/c/go/XAAP/DEDM-exprd1?s=S961&D=XTSM

When Jim Cramer Makes A Move, You'll Be There!

With your FREE Two-Week trial subscription to Jim Cramer's
Action Alerts PLUS, you'll get exclusive access to Jim
Cramer's specific action-oriented investment ideas and mid-to
long-term stock picks throughout the trading week:

* High-Octane Stock Picks and Commentary:

Within minutes of his trades, whether it's "Buy 100 shares
of ABC Company" on Monday or "Sell 75 shares of XYZ Company"
on Thursday, you'll get an email alert from Jim Cramer
detailing the trades he's making. You'll know immediately
which stocks Cramer is buying and selling and, most
importantly, "WHY" he's making those trades!

* Email Alerts in Real-Time:

Since these stock picks are delivered directly to your
email inbox, you can act immediately -- and strike while the
iron is hot -- to build a portfolio of stocks for mid-to
long-term gains.

It's like having Jim Cramer right beside you -- as
a portfolio-building coach!

Action Alerts PLUS is so unique because it includes the detailed
information about Jim Cramer's trades and the rationale behind
them.  You won't find this insightful content anywhere else.
The only way you can access this valuable information is by
activating your FREE trial today!

So if you're ready to supercharge your investing, and make
smarter investment decisions, click below for your FREE two-
week trial subscription to Jim Cramer's Action Alerts PLUS!

http://sub.thestreet.com/c/go/XAAP/DEDM-exprd1?s=S961&D=XTSM

===============================================================
This email has been sent to you by TheStreet.com because you are
a current or former subscriber (either free-trial or paid)
to one of our web sites, http://www.thestreet.com/or
http://www.realmoney.com/. If you would prefer not to receive
these types of emails from us in the future, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/z/unsubscribe.jhtml?Type=M  If you are
not a current or former subscriber, and you believe you received
this message in error, please forward this message to
members@realmoney.com, or call our customer service department
at 1-800-562-9571.

Please be assured that we respect the privacy of our subscribers.
To view our privacy policy, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html

Neither TheStreet.com nor James Cramer is registered as a
securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser either with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission or with any state securities
regulatory authority. Both the portfolio and the Action Alert emails
represent Mr. Cramer's own investment opinions, and should not be
construed as personalized investment advice. Mr. Cramer cannot and
does not assess, verify or guarantee the suitability of any
particular investment to your own situation. You bear responsibility
for your own investment research and decisions and should seek the
advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment.


Jane:
I believe we have already sent you the answers to these questions.  They were
sent to Tom Irwin.  Here are some of them again.  The rest of the answers for
the peakers will follow shortly - we are cleaning them up a little.
Ben


I assume we avoid Libya completely.  The question, though, may be how we
proceed if we are doing business with someone who has activities in Libya.
Your views please.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 09:01 AM -----

	Nicholas O'Day
	10/16/2000 04:59 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron's policy on Libya

Steve,

Itochu Corporation, a Japanese trading company with which we are developing a
relationship, is considering reactivating its activities in Libya. They have
identified an opportunity to source LNG from Libya for the purposes of
importing to Japan, either directly or through an LNG swap.

What is Enron's current policy on dealing with Libya?

kind regards


Are you going to this?  Isn't this in Florida?  What happened at the doctor?
Are you ok?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/06/2001 08:51 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Deerfield Development Review Committee Hearing - June 11th

fyi.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2001 08:50
AM ---------------------------
From: Steven Krimsky/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/06/2001 08:47 AM
To: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric Thode/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven
Rose/ENRON@enronXgate, Dave Kellermeyer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Raimund Grube/ENRON@enronXgate, Lea
Sooter/ENRON@enronXgate, cabrera@pbworld.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
dsmith@edsaplan.com@SMTP@enronXgate, currog@bellsouth.net@SMTP@enronXgate,
gfhhai@msn.com@SMTP@enronXgate, bernardkinney@aol.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
kabainc@bellsouth.net@SMTP@enronXgate, redelstein@ensr.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
jessica@curtisrogers.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
charlotte@bitner.com@SMTP@enronXgate, sosbourne@ensr.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
amontero@edsaplan.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
walter.bertschinger@mcmtrans.com@SMTP@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: Deerfield Development Review Committee Hearing - June 11th

Please plan to attend the hearing next Monday the 11th at 1:00 pm at
Deerfield Beach City Hall.; Should everything go well, this will be the only
public hearing in Deerfield.
;
We will be getting with each of you regarding presentational material, etc.
;
Also, please plan to attend a pre-meeting at;Keith & Associates Monday at
10:00 am.
;
Regards,
Steve


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
08:43 AM ---------------------------

Greg Couch
11/10/2000 03:52 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Lorenz/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Kids Find Contested Ballot to be Child's Play

---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Couch/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 03:52 PM
---------------------------

"Vance, Norman" <NVance@hess.com> on 11/10/2000 03:28:15 PM
To: "Greg Couch (E-mail)" <Greg.Couch@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Kids Find Contested Ballot to be Child's Play

Friday, November 10, 2000
IN THE NEWS..."Kids Find Contested Ballot to be Child's Play,"
The Shreveport Times, by Don Walker

"It's a ballot that perplexed Florida voters but was no match for the wits
of first- and fourth-graders at Stockwell Elementary School in Bossier City.

"Disillusioned and upset by the lingering chaos of this week's presidential
election, fourth-grade teacher Lisa Burns pulled a sample of the
controversial Palm Beach County, Fla., ballot off the Internet on Thursday.
She then put her class of 9- and 10-year-olds to the test.  'I gave them a
ballot and had them take a blue marker to vote for Al Gore and a red marker
to vote for George Bush. Then I had them put their name on the bottom of the
ballot and turn it in.'

"Turns out this election was mere child's play. Not one of the 22 students
present in class Thursday was confused by the ballot. Each one was marked
without error.

"Well, if a fourth-grader could do it, how about a first-grader? Down the
hall in Stacey Robinson's class, the ballot was handed out to 6- and
7-year-olds. Robinson used an overhead projector to point out Gore's name,
then asked the class of 24 students to find his bubble on the punch-card
ballot.

"'It wasn't a vote,' Robinson said. 'I just wanted to experiment to see if
they could find the correct bubble.'

"When the ballots were turned in, 19 of the first-graders marked the correct
bubble for Gore, three picked Buchanan's bubble, one picked Bush's and one
marked the bottom bubble for the 'Natural Law' party.

"'If a first-grader can choose the correct bubble, there's no legitimate
claim. Anyone could have done it,' Robinson said. 'A grown adult who took
any time at all could find it.'

"Still, even in a first-grade classroom, vote tabulations were the subject
of protest and controversy. 'I thought we were voting,' Brady McCoy, 6, of
Haughton grumbled after he was told to find and punch the 'Gore' bubble. 'I
wanted to vote for George Bush!'"


The PRELIMINARY Violation Memos for 11/19/01 have been published and are available for viewing on the ERV:  http:\\erv.corp.enron.com - Violation/Notification Memo Section.


?

Hi Folks,

?

Matchups to Avoid  and Exploit.?

Passing Game  Matchups.?? Here's how I see the matchups this  week.? Please
note, see the  cheatsheet online?http://www.cheatsheets.net/week15sheet.htm?
for exactly where I rank playersand to  determine who to start.? Just because
one matchup may be more  favorable than another, that doesn't necessarily
mean I'd start the player with  the best matchup.? The matchup info  is meant
to be just one more tool in your box when it comes to deciding between
players.??

Note:? I,ve used the player stats sorted by  performance over the last four
weeks extensively in developing these write-ups.  Stats are provided by Mike
Hall,s excellent FLM League Management Software.? http://www.fflm.com/for
more info.?

Here we go:

Locks:? These games heavily favor the Offense

Seattle Passing  Game vs Bronco Defense??  If we,ve seen one  trend recently
in defenses it,s to start your QB / WR / TEs against the Broncos  and worry
about your RBs.? They,re  tough on the running game but easy against the
pass.? I won,t get into whether that,s a  &chicken or the egg8 situation but
the bottom line is go with your passing guys  against Denver.? They rank # 31
in  passing yards allowed per game over the last four weeks.? QB Jon Kitna
gets another start  and while I have a hard time putting too much faith in
him, he,s been ok.? Derrick  Mayesand  Sean  Dawkinsshould see lots  of
action and rookie Darrell  Jacksonis working his  way back into the mix.? If
you,ve  been sitting on RB Shaun  Alexander, coach Mike  Holmgren did say he
wanted to see more of Alexander in passing downs but I,m  still not too
excited about him yet.

Tennessee Passing  Game vs Bengal Defense?? Once again, keep an eye on  QB
Steve  McNair,shealth this  week.? It,s early, but he,s already  being called
a game time decision as he tries to recover from knee and ankle  injuries.?
Keep your fingers crossed  as it,s a tasty matchup vs the weak Bengal pass
defense.? They rank # 30 in passing yards allowed  per game over the last
month and are just playing out the season.? Cornerback Rodney Heath is lost
for the  year with a bad shoulder and that should make things even easier.?
Derrick  Masonis the clear cut  # 1 WR with Chris  Sanders# 2.? The best
receiver on the team (or at  least most utilized) is TE Frank  Wycheckwho,s
starting to  get back to his normal high level of  production.

Denver Passing  Game vs Seahawk Defense??? By now you know the  drill:? Start
any player vs  Seattle.? Just do it.? The Seahawks are anemic.? QB Brian
Griese did start to throw some  but he,s still at least a couple weeks away,
maybe more.? Gus  Frerottegets another  start and if you,re looking for him
to regain that 400+ yard form he showed  early on, this is his best chance to
do it.? Rod Smithand  Ed  McCaffreyare the usual  must starts at WR.?  Dwayne
 Carswelland  Desmond  Clarkare excellent  plays at TE.? I,d start either
one  and feel pretty good about it, especially  Carswell.

Baltimore Passing  Game vs Charger Defense?? San Diego made a run back at
respectability on defense but I,m thinking they,ve fallen back down to well
below average.? Over the last four  weeks, they rank # 27 in passing yards
allowed per game.? For the year, they rank # 28 in Fantasy  Points allowed to
the opposing QB.?  The Ravens come back after a bye week off and should be
ready to  roll.? QB Trent  Dilferis playing  exceptionally well and WRs
Qadry  Ismailand  Patrick  Johnsoncould do  well.? The most enticing matchup
may  be Shannon  Sharpeas San Diego  ranks just 24th in Fantasy Points
allowed to the opposing TE for the  year.

St. Louis Passing  Game vs Viking Defense?? I don,t think you keep  QB Kurt
Warnerdown for  long.? Sure, he had an awful game  last week but some of that
can be blamed on the WRs who I bet you don,t see drop  half of what Warner
throws this time.?  The Vikings still give up lots of passing yards ranking #
26 in passing  yards allowed per game over the last month.? For the year,
they rank # 24 in Fantasy  Points allowed to the opposing QB.?  Isaac Bruce
is the best WR  while Torry Holthas been  surprisingly disappointing lately.?
 He,s still worth a start though.?  Az-Zahir  Hakimalways has a  chance too.?
The Vikings just don,t  have the secondary to keep up with these  guys.

?

Prime Matchups:? These games favor the  Offense?

Buffalo  Passing Game vs Colt Defense?? I probably get more mail from my
ripping Rob Johnson than I do for any other player.? I make no apologies as I
really just  don,t like the guy.? He simply has  major troubles finishing a
game.?  Although he draws a great matchup this week against Indy, one of the
weaker defenses in the league.?  Safety Chad Cota has a concussion and is
questionable so they might be  even less effective.? On the other  hand, the
Colts definitely seem to up the intensity at home.? As you can see from my
rankings, I,m not  thinking too much of Johnson again this week, but he does
have a good  matchup.? Eric Moulds is the  primary WR as always with Peerless
Price and Jeremy McDonald  picking up the scraps.? TE Jay  Reimersma is a
favorite target and gets plenty of looks.?

Pittsburgh  Passing Game vs Giants Defense?? The Kordell Stewart  Bandwagon
is getting awfully crowded lately, but for good reason.? He,s playing very
solid football.? More importantly, he cleared a huge  hurdle Sunday showing
some leadership and toughness coming back in the game  after injuring his
leg.? The Giants  defense is very beatable but do understand coach Jim
Fassell,s media games where  he says &ok8 more than Joe Pesci in Lethal
Weapon are apparently working as his  playoff guarantee seems to have
inspired the team.?? The pass defense still ranks # 25  in passing yards
allowed  per game over the last month though.? For the year, they rank # 23
in Fantasy Points  allowed to the opposing QB.? Hines Ward is the WR of
choice on  this team and I,d feel fine starting him. He,s not even the true #
2 guy, but  you could do worse then taking a reach on Bobby Shaw.? For some
reason, I like him over starter  Courtney Hawkins. Even TE Mark Bruener is a
solid choice as he,s  done more in the last two weeks than he,s done in two
years.???

Kansas City  Passing Game vs Panthers Defense? I,m  dreading the Gunther
Cunningham firing as he may make Dick Vermiel look like  Iron Mike.? A solid
game here could  help him keep his job (which may have Chief fans pulling for
Carolina()? From a FF perspective, I like Elvis  Grbac here.? He showed
Monday  night he was clearly back from the finger troubles.? As usual, the
running game is a mess but  that,s good news for Elvis owners as he,s forced
to go with what,s been working  for them ) throwing the ball.? TE  Tony
Gonzalez is having the incredible season we all predicted for him and  he,s
certainly the best receiver on the team.? Derrick Alexander is a sure
starter too.? Sylvester  Morris continues to regress which is troubling.?
Carolina ranks just # 24 in passing yards allowed per  game over the last
four games although for the year, they,ve  fared better ranking # 9 in
Fantasy Points allowed to the  opposing QB.? Part  of that is they seem to
give up a lot of yards without yielding the TD so be  leery in TD only
leagues.?

Carolina  Passing Game vs Chief Defense?? If you,ve been fence sitting with
Steve Beuerlein, this may be a week to take a close look at him.? The Chiefs
rank # 21 in passing yards allowed per  game over the last four weeks and
they may be missing CB James  Hasty who,s questionable with a knee.?  WR
Muhsin Muhammad is playing like a man possessed lately and he,s  a sure
starter.? Donald Hayes  got through last week,s game without reinjuring his
groin and he,s a solid  option as well.? TE Kris  Mangum is no Wesley Walls
but he,s a pretty good player.? The Chiefs do get back home where  they,re
tougher but I like this matchup.?

San  Francisco Passing Game vs Saints Defense??  The 49er pass defense is
better than people think and the Saints defense  is worse than many assume.?
Over the  last four games New Orleans ranks # 20 in passing yards allowed
per  game.? (the 49ers  rank # 16)? In reality, both  defenses are pretty
suspect.? And  both teams feature QBs who will be winging the ball.? Jeff
Garcia picked up right where  he left off last week against a tough San Diego
defense.? It was great news for Terrell  Owens fans as he looks on his way
back.? In the meantime, Jerry Rice  showed he still has a few tricks in the
bag.? I wouldn,t be surprised to see Tai  Streets and J.J. Stokes see
increased time at Rice,s expense though  as many feel the Hall of Famer isn,t
in the 49er,s plans for 2001.? RB Charlie Garner is always a threat  catching
the ball.? TE Greg  Clark is suddenly a producer so he,s worth a shot too.
This could be a  shootout.?

Jacksonville  Passing Game vs Cardinal Defense??  Two teams heading for the
couch in the post season but that,s about all  they have in common.?
Jacksonville  just ran out of time as they,re playing well now.? Arizona is
heading downhill from an  already low position.? Arizona ranks  # 19 over the
last four weeks in passing yards allowed per  game.? QB Mark  Brunell had an
injury to his non throwing shoulder but appears to be  fine.? He could be a
decent play  along with WRs Jimmy Smith and Keenan McCardell.? Arizona CB
Aneaes Williams is a player  but he can,t do it all.? The biggest  problem
for the Jaguar passing game is talking coach Tom Coughlin into calling
something besides a Fred Taylor run which will likely result in a 7 yard
gain  each time(?

Minnesota  Passing Game vs Ram Defense?? You don,t need any analysis from  me
to know you,d better start Daunte Culpepper, Cris Carter and Randy  Moss.?
The Rams are much  improved on pass defense where over the last four weeks,
they rank # 17  in passing yards allowed  per game.? Still  though, the
Minnesota &Big 38 (&Big 48 counting RB Robert Smith) are no  brainers.??

New Orleans  Passing Game vs 49er Defense?? QB Aaron Brooks  continues to be
one of the better stories of this season.? He,s facing a 49er time that,ll be
chock  full of youngsters although they,re playing better of late ranking #
16  in passing yards allowed  per game over the last four weeks.? But that
was before losing Safety Lance  Shulters to a torn ACL last week.?  Brooks
will have Joe Horn catching the ball and Horn should  continue to shine.?
Willie  Jackson is a solid # 2 WR and TE Andrew Glover has come alive
lately.?

??

Even Matchups:? These games  feature no real advantage either way?

Detroit  Passing Game vs Packer Defense?? Of course, all this hinges on the
ribs of one Charlie Batch.?  If he can,t go, all bets are off.?  In fact,
even if he can go, you should hedge your bets a bit as we,ve  already seen
one good shot to the chest can mean taking a seat for Batch.? It,s not a bad
matchup though against a  Green Bay defense that,s ranked # 22 in passing
yards allowed per  game.? Johnnie  Morton is likely the top choice at WR with
Herman Moore in the mix  too.? Germane Crowell may be  able to make his
return this week as he,s been practicing this week.? I wouldn,t start him yet
but keep an eye  out as might pay dividends for astute owners who scoop him
up.? I can see plenty of James Stewart in  this one though as the weather
could be really nasty for this  one.?

Chicago  Passing Game vs Patriot Defense?? This one,s full of story lines as
a healthy Cade McNown remains on the bench this week in favor of Shane
Matthews.? The juicy rumor here  is that according to a story in the Sun
Times, McNown would receive a $8.25  million escalator clause if he plays in
55% of the offensive snaps this year and  next.? He,s currently at 54%(?
Conspiracies aside, Matthews will be  without WR Marcus Robinson who,s out
for the year with a bulging disk in  his back.? New England ranks # 23  over
the last four weeks in passing yards allowed per  game but the turmoil could
take it,s toll on the Bears.? The Bears will also be without Offensive
Coordinator Gary Crowton who took the BYU job.? Some think that will be a
positive.?? I honestly have a hard time  getting too excited about Eddie
Kennison and Marty  Booker.?

Dallas  Passing Game vs Redskin Defense? I,m really interested to see how
the  team responds to new coach Terry Robiskie.?  I,ll be surprised if they
don,t kick things up several notches.? Although I do find it odd that the
guy  in charge of the worst performing part of the team (passing game) is the
guy  they decided to elevate to head coach.?  Who knows?? QB Troy  Aikman
will try to get through another game without being maimed.? He,ll have James
McKnight and  Wayne McGarity to throw to but neither guy looks too promising
against a  pretty tough defense.? Dallas showed  last week the complete lack
of faith they have in Aikman when they kept feeding  Emmitt Smith the ball as
they trailed Tampa by a mile.? David LaFluer and Jackie  Harris both are
dropping along with Aikman.?

Philadelphia  Passing Game vs Brown Defense?? Two teams used to bringing up
the  rear lately meet with one soaring and the other limping.? QB Donovan
McNabb finds himself  in a strange spot here.? The Browns  are so pitiful
against the rush that most teams choose to rush the ball on them  at the
expense of throwing it.? But  with McNabb the team,s best rusher, he,ll have
to decide which way he,s going to  beat the Browns.? Charles Johnson  and
Torrance Small aren,t much.?  TE Chad Lewis is the best receiver and he could
make some  noise.? I'm interested to see how quickly they work in newly
signed  RB Chris Warren.

Miami  Passing Game vs Buccaneer Defense??  Another good case of
misconceptions.? Miami is better throwing the ball than  people give them
credit for and the Bucs aren,t as dominant stopping the pass  like many
think.? Over the last four  weeks, Tampa ranks # 14 in passing yards allowed
per  game.? Very solid  for sure, but not dominating.?  Jay Fiedler continues
to astound his critics as he threw for 3 TDs  Sunday.? I don,t think you,ll
see  the same production here but he,s still a decent play.? Leslie Shepherd
had been my  favorite WR here but with his surgery, it looks like Tony Martin
will  finally get a start.? Oronde  Gadsden continues to make sick catches.?

?

Downside Matchups:? These games favor the  Defense

Cleveland Passing  Game vs Eagle Defense ??This is where Doug Pederson,s at:?
He gets the start this week because  rookie Spergon Wynn can,t go due to
injury(?? WR Kevin Johnson is running the  scout team in practice.? Against
the  tough Eagles secondary, he likely will have trouble no matter where he
lines  up.? I don,t look for much here from  any of these guys.

Cincinnati Passing  Game vs Titan Defense?? The Bengals just won,t die
quietly.? Corey Dillon keeps running  the ball like a mad bull and QB Scott
Mitchellseems intent on  proving to folks he really can play at this level.?
He may be able to but he draws a tough  matchup Sunday in a Titan team that,s
solid.? They rank # 11 over the last four week  in passing yards allowed per
game.?  Although they may catch break as CB Samari Rolle is nursing a bad
wrist  and will likely have to play with a brace.?  WR  Peter Warrickwill
reportedly  have his contact lenses Thursday and that could make a
difference.? He,s often worth a roll of the dice for  the start as he has the
big play  potential.

New York Giant  Passing Game vs Steeler Defense?? The Steelers seemed to
enjoy the  spoiler role last week against Oakland and they get another shot
this week  against the Giants.? Pittsburgh,s  playing tough pass defense now
as they rank # 10 in passing yards allowed per  game over the last four
games.?  Kerry  Collinsis steady but not  exciting.? He,ll be throwing to
WRs Amani  Toomerand  Joe  Jureviciusas it looks like  Ike Hilliard may not
be fully ready yet this week.? Keep an eye on that one though.? TE Pete
Mitchellhasn,t been  nearly the factor we,d thought he,d be.

Oakland Passing  Game vs Jets Defense?? The Raiders look to bounce back  this
week and you can bet they do a better job keeping up with the down and
distance.? The Jets are playing  tough defense of late ranking # 9 in passing
yards allowed per game over the  last four weeks.? Still though,  QB Rich
Gannonis a pretty much  sure starter unless you,re loaded at QB.?  Same thing
with WR Tim  Brown.? You might roll the dice on  Andre  Risonor  James
Jettbut Brown is the  man.? TE Ricky Dudley  is likely worth a  start just on
potential but he,s incredibly frustrating. (like I needed to tell  the Dudley
owners THAT()?

Green Bay Passing  Game vs Lion Defense?? Not only must the Lions defense
hit the field without star CB Bryant Westbrook, they also have to face  Brett
 Favrein the cold  weather where he,s invincible.?  Check the weather
conditions for this one as it could be more than just  cold.? He,s good when
it,s freezing  outside but trying to throw the ball in a driving snowstorm is
an entirely  different matter.? Favre will be  throwing to WR Bill Schroeder
who I think is the  better WR choice over mega bucks Antonio  Freeman.? TE
Bubba  Franksis always worth a  look.? RB Ahman  Greenis a nice  surprise and
he,s catching the ball well.

New York Jets Passing  Game vs Raider Defense??  Two teams that,ll see  what
they,re made of square off in a Sunday Night matchup.? The Raiders are tough
against the pass  ranking # 7 in passing yards allowed per game over the last
four weeks.? QB Vinny  Testeverdeseems to have  finally gotten himself
untracked.?  WR Wayne Chrebetmay be handled by Charles Woodson but that
leaves  Dedric Wardand  Windrell Hayesfor  WRs.? They,ll be fine.? FB Richie
Andersonquietly racks up receiving totals and he could have  a good day again
this week.?  TE Anthony Becht continues to play well and is really coming
along.

New England  Passing Game vs Chicago Defense?? Star QBs on the bench(
Coaches  leaving( What,s a player to think??  If you,re a defensive player
for the Bears, you,re thinking you,d better  go out and prove some people
wrong that think you,re finished.? Chicago plays tough pass defense ranking
# 6 in passing yards allowed per game over the last four week.? QB Drew
Bledsoe  will look for  WR Terry  Glennand the suddenly  red hot Troy Brown.?
TEs Rod  Rutledgeand  Jermaine  Wigginshold down the TE  spot.? I hope
Shockmain Davis gets a  TD as I love to write his name(?

Indianapolis  Passing Game vs Bills Defense?? QB Peyton  Manningis still a
starter in most leagues but you should know he,s facing a tough matchup this
week. He struggled a bit last time these teams met with a season low 187
yards  passing (although he did have 2 TDs)?  Marvin  Harrisonis of course
the  clear cut # 1 Guy.? It looks like  Terrence  Wilkinsis finally  breaking
out of his slump and could be a contributor again.? Both TEs Ken Dilgerand
Marcus  Pollardhaven,t played up  to their potential of late.? Even  with the
bad game last week against Miami, the Bills still rank # 5 over the  last
four week in passing yards allowed per game.?

??

Defensive Slam Dunks:? These games heavily favor the  Defense

Tampa Bay Passing  Game vs Miami Defense??  Don,t start your  passing game
guys against the Dolphins.?  CBs Sam Madison and Patrick Surtain just shut
people down.? Especially a QB like Shaun King who,s  not 100% healthy in
addition to being just an adequate QB.? Keyshawn Johnson is almost always
worth  a start just for the showmanship but I,m not excited about Tampa
throwing the  ball here.

Washington Passing  Game vs Cowboy Defense?? Brad  Johnson,sprobably taken
his last snap as a Redskin, especially after he suggested he,d done so.? That
means big armed  Jeff  Georgetakes the  helm.?? He,ll likely face a  Cowboy
defense that,s tough against the pass for one simple reason:? they,re awful
defending the run and  teams just choose to run all over them.?  Look for
Stephen Davis  to wear it  out.? When George does throw, I  think James
Thrashis the best  option.?  Albert  Connellwill likely start  but Thrash
makes plenty of plays.?  TE  Stephen Alexanderis probably worth  a shot as is
pass catching FB Larry  Centers.

San Diego Passing  Game vs Raven Defense?? Ryan Leafand company get  the
&honor8 of facing the # 3 ranked defense over the past 4 weeks in passing
yards allowed per game.? It should  be interesting.? Leaf will be  throwing
to TE Freddie  Jonesand  WR Curtis  Conway.? Jeff Graham  suffered a mouth
injury last week and may need dental surgery.? It,s probably just as well as
this  matchup is looking very sketchy for  Leaf.
Arizona  Passing Game vs Jaguar Defense??? This could get ugly all  around.?
Jacksonville ranks # 4 over  the last four weeks in passing yards allowed per
game.? And Arizona,s Jake  Plummeris nursing bad ribs.? We saw with  Charlie
Batch last week that it,s hard for a team to keep a QB in the game if  he,s
got injured ribs.? David  Bostonis playing well lately and Frank  Sanders has
 been awful.? I,m not excited about  any of them for this week.

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com


(See attached file: The Day Ahead US_May 15.pdf)

      Carr Futures
      150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
      Chicago, IL 60606  USA
      Tel:  312-368-6149
      Fax:  312-368-2281
      soblander@carrfut.com
      http://www.carrfut.com
 - The Day Ahead US_May 15.pdf


Attached are my notes (so far) on Dominion.  This file is saved under o:/Gas Structuring/Bankruptcy Folder/Transportation/Dominion/Notes_Dominion.doc.

I also saved Dominion's motion and the attached ehibits to the motion under this directory somewhere.  I'm currently working on the excel worksheets showing all the dollars that are owed pre-petition and post-petition.

Shemin, this is NIMO's web site ==>   http://www.niagaramohawk.com/youracct/priceenrg/buspricing/buspricing.html
I think this link will take you directly to the tariff.


Steve,

Attached is Business Controls' assessment of factors that could cause a
significant deterioration in the security posture at Dabhol.  Essentially,
the likelihood of serious security problems seems to be low, but because the
situation is both complicated and extremely fluid, it will need to be watched
closely as matters move toward resolution.  We're continuing our on-site
assistance in both Dabhol and Mumbai and fleshing out contingency plans for
evacuation and other worst-case scenarios.  A hard copy of this document has
been delivered to Rebecca McDonald.

David Cromley
Director, Business Analysis
Enron Corp.
(713) 345-4513


Thanks for the website.


Susan,

I am afraid I have some bad news (well, happy in some ways but not so good
in others)... I have decided to move in with Deron and will not be renewing
my lease at the end of November.  I am really going to miss it, but the
reality is that I am rarely there, and the
I-need-to-start-saving-money-for-a-house side of me knows it is silly to
keep paying rent.

Oh, and I started a new job.. I work at Exult now
(ashley.streetman@exult.net).  We are a whopping 15 blocks away from Hewitt.

Some of my things are slowly trickling over to Deron's, but things should be
in good order to show.

Deron said he would be happy to post an ad for it/you at Hewitt in the Want
Ads database, if you would like (that is how I heard about it, from
Karen)... I have very nice things to say about the apartment and landlord,
so I would be very happy to reassure any prospective tenants that they would
be moving into an excellent place.

My new work phone is 281 539 6582.

:) ashley


Sally -

Attached are the hypertiles from the final report out at yesterday's ASE
Studio Workshop.  The CD is finished and on its way to Houston.  The files
are organized by team:

Hammer - Sales and Marketing, Vision Stmt, Mission Stmt, Target Market, How
to Approach, Pricing, SLA
Pliers - Producst and Services - Consulting Based
Saw - Infrastructure Transition Plan
Wrench - Producst and Services - Basic Outsourcing

I hope these help with your meeting tomorrow.  Let me know if there is
anything else I can do to help.
Lisa P
5-6352

Hammer

Pliers

Saw

Wrench


Everyone,

I am beginning to receive phone calls and emails from some of the CA
businesses that Ken sent letters to on Monday.  I will be tracking these
businesses through a database, but we need to start following up with phone
calls and additional information.

I will keep you posted on who is asking for more information, and all
materials that we send to these businesses going foward.  However, I will
need your help in placing follow up phone calls.

To that end, I would like Mark and Rick to make the first two phone calls
today.  Keep in mind we sent out two letters.  Before you contact these
folks, you might want to check the list to see which letter we sent out.
(I'm attaching the final list.  The highlighted companies - 15 -  received
the letter from Ken that indicated he would follow up personally.  Everyone
else - 100 -  received the generic letter).

****Whomever you talk with, be sure and confirm the address and phone number
and names for where we should send future information (see list) thanks!!!

Mark Palmer
Ms. Kris Essell (check the spelling when you talk with her)
Public Affairs Rep to Chairman Sherry Lansing
Paramount Pictures
323-956-5202
Asked for additional materials

Rick Shapiro
Tamsin Randlett
Senior Director, Government Affairs
Gap Inc.
415-427-3516
Asked for additional materials


thank you very much.  i left a message on her voicemail.  that oughta do for
now.


Sorry to those of you who can't receive pictures  that are inserted into the
text.
Randall Thomas Harman writes, "Spacer......I cannot open your files,
man....what is wrong??  I get unknown
file format.

Do I need to get a "Hi Tec" to help me in  wasting more of my day looking at
ol' Beta pics?"
So here the pictures are as attachments
 - Beta Hell Week.JPG
 - Beta Anderson.JPG
 - Beta Elton Rob.JPG
 - einstein_tongue.jpg
 - Beta House pre burn.JPG
 - President's Sail.JPG


Billy:

All are Delaware with the exception of:

LOA, Inc. -- Texas
Enron Canada Corp. -- Province of Alberta

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Dixon, Billy D" <billy.dixon@bp.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 11:18 AM
To:	Heard, Marie; St. Clair, Carol
Subject:	RE: Original signature exchange

Marie:

Would you please tell me the state or province of incorporation of all of
the Enron entities in the master netting agreement?

This is for financing statement purposes.

Below are bp's:

BP Corporation North America Inc. -- Indiana
BP Energy Company -- Delaware
Vastar Resources, Inc. -- Delaware
BP Canada Energy Company -- Nova Scotia
BP Canada Energy Marketing Corp. -- Delaware
Cibola Energy Services Corporation -- Texas
IGI Resources, Inc. -- Idaho
BP Oil Supply Company -- Delaware
BP Products North America Inc. -- Maryland
BP Amoco Chemical Company -- Delaware
Atlantic Richfield Company -- Delaware
Amoco Production Company -- Delaware
BP Chemicals Inc. -- Ohio

Thanks.

Billy Dixon

-----Original Message-----
From: Heard, Marie [mailto:Marie.Heard@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 8:55 AM
To: billy.dixon@bp.com; St. Clair, Carol
Subject: RE: Original signature exchange

Yes, we do want to exchange originals.  My originals are in our Calgary
office getting original signatures.  I will send one copy to you when I
receive them back.  Should probably be tomorrow or Wednesday.

Thanks!

Marie

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Dixon, Billy D" <billy.dixon@bp.com>@ENRON
> Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 8:50 AM
> To:	St. Clair, Carol; Heard, Marie
> Subject:	Original signature exchange
>
> Carol and Marie:
>
> I am assuming that Enron wants to exchange one set of originals on the
> NA
> Master Agreement?  If so, please indicate by reply and I will mail a
> set to
> Marie Heard.
>
> Very truly yours,
>
> BILLY
> Billy D. Dixon
> Attorney
> BP America Inc.
> 501 Westlake Park Blvd., Rm 16.166
> Houston, Texas 77079
> Direct 281/366-4745
> Fax 281/366-5901
> billy.dixon@bp.com
>
> ***IMPORTANT -- THIS EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENTS HERETO ARE
> ATTORNEY-CLIENT
> AND/OR ATTORNEY WORK-PRODUCT PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.  If you have
> received this email in error, do not under any circumstances read,
> forward,
> copy, disseminate or save this email or any of its attachments.  If
> you have
> received this email in error, take the following actions: (1) reply to
> this
> email indicating that you received this email in error, and (2) delete
> and
> completely erase this email and its attachments from your computer and
> any
> backup systems or "Deleted Items" folders.
>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Attached for your information/review is the latest draft of the VEPCO
contract.

Thanks,

Kay


Attached is the trade count for Nov 28, 2000 sorted by Country, Commodity and
Category.
If you have any questions call me at 3-6460
Regards
jr