Click  Here to Receive Your 10% Bonus Offer!    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]       Get your game on with NFL playoff football at the world's most interactive venue for sportsbetting...   10% bonus for all new players!  Licensed and Regulated in North America   Sports Interaction  offers you the security and peace of mind of betting on NFL football with a world leader.  You can bet online instantly with your credit card, using the currency of your choice.  Try it now!   [IMAGE]   AFC Championship  New England Patriots vs. Pittsburgh Steelers   [IMAGE]   NFC Championship  Philadelphia Eagles vs. St. Louis Rams   Click here to bet on the NFL Playoffs!   View the latest betting information, place bets and transfer funds to and from your account, all from the convenience of your PC, 24 hours a day.  Get 24-hour online access through the Internet, 24-hour customer service and the world's easiest to use Internet betting system.  And with our easy $20 minimum deposit - $1 minimum bet system, anyone can get in on the action, anytime. Click Here To Start Betting Today!  [IMAGE]

 You  are subscribed to the RealBigWinners.com newsletter as: andrew.h.lewis@enron.com  If you wish to unsubscribe please click the link below:    Click Here to Unsubscribe

[IMAGE]


If you would prefer not to receive these special offers from
preferred PlaySite partners, or you received this in error,
please see the bottom of this e-mail for information on
unsubscribing.
------------------------------------------------------------
[IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Audilble.com
, the source for great audio entertainment and information, brings you this special offer.  Act now and you can download and listen to a best seller, or any one of thousands of books in our store, for just $1.95 - without exception, without restriction and regardless of the listed retail price. Choose from over 20,000 selections.  Now you can forget about those expensive and clumsy audiobooks on cassette and CD.  Audible.com
 is digital so you can listen on any computer or AudibleReady? Pocket PC or MP3 player.  Listen on your commute or at the gym or anywhere you want to get away from it all. [IMAGE]
[IMAGE] Select from our entire library of titles, including: [IMAGE]
 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE] When you're ready to check out, you will be charged only $1.95 for the MOST EXPENSIVE title in your shopping basket, regardless of the listed retail price. Act now and this special offer is yours! [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]
		Note: This offer cannot be applied toward the purchase of subscription programs. Offer expires 8/31/2001. Valid only for first-time customers. This offer is intended only for first-time purchases. You may have received this in error if you currently have more than one active Audible account. Audible reserves the right to cancel, change or substitute this offer at any time. Void where prohibited by law and subject to all federal, state and local laws and regulations.  ? Copyright 2001 Audible, Inc., All Rights Reserved>

==================================================
Your current registration information indicates that you wish
to receive periodic e-mails from us representing other
companies that we believe you may find interesting.
We have your registered as lcampbel@enron.com.
If you would prefer not to receive this information from
PlaySite, or you received this in error, please click here: http://zzz2.net/UM/CMF.asp?A25.523.734841
To review our Terms of Service: http://www.playsite.com/help/agreement.html
To review our Privacy Policy: http://www.go2net.com/corporate/privacy.html


Steve,
    I don't have any revenue supporting schedules for Third C.E. or Plan. Could you please provide electronically to Rod monthly detailed volumes and revenues both Firm and Interruptible which tie back to both projections. If you should think of any other supporting documents that could be useful, please provide those also. Once again, thanks for all your help on such a short notice.
                                                                                Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:41 AM
To:	Kleb, Steve
Cc:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	FW: TW Plan and Forecast revenue backup

What do you have to backup the 2001 and 2002 revenue projections for NNG?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Howard, Kevin A.
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 6:00 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: TW Plan and Forecast revenue backup

John O'Shea was looking for the revenue backup for NNG.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:55 PM
To:	Howard, Kevin A.
Subject:	TW Plan and Forecast revenue backup

 << File: PLAN_FORECAST_DESIGN_MASTER_WITH_STRETCH_Rev_10_08.xls >>  << File: CE 3-2001.xls >>

Rod Hayslett
EB4054
713-853-6178


No, but we add different provisions to the Master Agreement  for commodity
trades and currency/rate trades.

	From:  Rod Nelson                           04/25/2000 09:49 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

commodity only (as far as I know and based on trades thus far).  Does it have
to be one or the other?

Rod


Attached please find the NDA for transmittal to Bo Collins.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shults, Bob
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:36 AM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	FW: J. Robert Collins

Tana I need to send Bo Collins a NDA concerning a potential market making/technology license transaction.  Please draft an agreement ASAP that I can then send to Bo with a note.  All of the information is in the attached card.

 << Message: J. Robert Collins >>


FYI- Study by Paul Joskow and Alfred Kahn that concludes, among other things,
that market fundamentals in California do not fully account for price levels
in Californis this past summer.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 11/28/2000
11:39 AM ---------------------------

Aleck Dadson@ECT
11/27/2000 12:27 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Power Prices in California

FYI

__________________

FYI
----- Forwarded by Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT on 11/27/2000 01:23 PM -----

	"Colin Schuch" <SchuchCo@oeb.gov.on.ca>
	11/24/2000 03:43 PM

		 To: <Adadson@ect.enron.com>, <conway@enerconnect.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Power Prices in California

Guys:

I thought you might be interested in this paper by Joskow on the
California crisis.

Regards . . . Colin

 - CalifWithholdJoskow-Khan.pdf


Steve:

Attached is a memo that reponds to your question:  "Can the solution to the
utilities' undecollection problem take place at the PUC, or is a legislative
fix required?"  As we discussed, I'm also attaching a memo from Mike Day on
the issue.

Bottom line:  It's within the PUC's jurisdiction to solve the problem, but
the likelihood is high that it will be a key focus of the Legislature in the
next session.  If you, or anyone on the distribution, have any questions, let
me know.

Best,
Jeff


NYMEX Membership Services
April 26, 2001
Notice # MS-28

REINSTATMENT OF MEMBERSHIP PRIVILEGES

 Please be advised that effective April 26, 2001, the following member(s) has
reinstated his membership privileges:

Michael Wall (WALL-4656), as a Licensee with a qualified trader guarantee
provided by Pioneer Futures, Inc.

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TRANSFER

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, April 26, 2001,
he following member(s) have given notice of intention to transfer their sole
Membership within the Exchange:

Frank Belcastro (OLDS-4332)

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO LEASE ORIGINAL MEMBERSHIP

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, April 26, 2001,
the following member(s) have given notice of intention to lease their sole
membership privileges:

Dwight Steinhauser (DGS-7012)

 Members and Member Firms have (10) days from the date of this notice to
advise the Corporate Secretary,s Office of any claims in accordance with Rule
2.51.

 Inquiries regarding the above should be addressed to the Member Services
Department at 212-299-2379.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(MS-28)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Mr. Baughman

I am highly interested in this position.  I have limited knowledge of the power industry through exposure to underwriting, notional pricing, commodity structuring, and my risk mgmt groups.

My best qualifying strength:  highly aggressive, professional personality.

Please call to discuss.

Regards

Dennis Brown
ext 55050


Darla,

This is what I have been able to find so far regarding fixed prices for citizens for Feb:

50,000/mo @ $7.55
50,000/mo @ $7.96
100,000/ mo @ $9.07

we also did a deal for 1,565/day @ $7.12.

Have they given you any information that you can compare this to?  Let me know if you have any questions and I will send you a spreadsheet with all fixed price deals I have done to date.  March and april should be final.  You can send me a monthly email when you are ready to do - say - mays invoice - and I will send you everything I have done with them.

Call me with questions -

Kim


MARKET NOTIFICATION OF SYSTEM CHANGE

PIP Number(s):        144, 200

PRR Number(s):       294

Protocol Section(s):   4.4.4, 6.3.1, 11.4.1.1

Implementation Date:     January 18, 2002

Description of System Change:

ERCOT plans to implement PIP 144/PRR 294 (Load Ratio Shares per LSE) and
PIP 200 (LSE Load Ratio and Loss Allocation) on January 18, 2002.   The
Protocol revision for PIP 144 impacts sections 4.4.4 and 6.3.1 of the
Protocols.  The revision for PIP 200 is documented in section 11.4.1.1
of the protocols.

Currently, ERCOT calculates ancillary service obligations for each QSE
for a given trade day based on the QSE???s aggregated Load Ratio Share as
of the same day of the prior week.  This results in the use of QSE/LSE
relationships from one week prior to calculate ancillary service
obligations.  When an LSE switches from one QSE to another, the
obligation associated with its load continue to be allocated to the old
QSE for one week after the effective date of the switch.  The same
obligation does not get allocated to the new QSE for the first week
after the switch.  QSEs also do not have access to Load Ratio Share data
per LSE that makes up their ancillary service obligations.

This modification will alter the way the QSE Load Ratio Shares are
aggregated so that ancillary service obligations are calculated based on
the QSE/LSE relationships that will be effective on the trade day for
which obligations are being posted.  Load Ratio Shares will be
calculated and saved by LSE during the data aggregation process run for
initial settlement of the trade day in question.  QSE Load Ratio Share
will then be aggregated and posted for a given trade day based on the
sum of LSE Load Ratio Shares calculated as described above corresponding
to the most current QSE/LSE relationships for that trade day.

Scheduled Extract Changes:  Billing determinants for LSE Load Ratio
Shares called LRSLSE will be added to the load extract.  Each QSE will
have the LRSLSE fields added to its load extract for each LSE it
represents.  Each LSE will also have the LRSLSE field added to its load
extract with its Load Ratio Share information.

Dynamic Extract:  The Settlement and Billing folder within the archive
extracts area of the portal will have an additional dynamic extract
folder added called ???Obligations???.  This dynamic extract folder will
have two extracts called ???QSE obligations??? and ???LSE obligations??? which
can be used to query Load Ratio Shares by QSE and LSE.  The following
ERCOT total quantities will also be added to the dynamic extracts above:

??        Total obligated non-spinning quantity (NSOTOT)

??        Total obligated regulation down quantity (RDOTOT)

??        Total obligated responsive reserve quantity (RROTOT)

??        Total obligated regulation up quantity (RUOTOT)

You can find details of PRR-294 at the following link:
http://www.ercot.com/AboutERCOT/PublicDisclosure/ProtocolRev.htm .

If you have any questions, please call your ERCOT client service
representative.


Good afternoon,

I'm forwarding a revised development agreement term sheet, showing revisions
from your original version.

We look forward to seeing you soon.

Thanks,

Kay


I agree with your last sentence.  Thanks for helping us through this crunch time.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corman, Shelley
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 5:22 PM
To:	Horton, Stanley
Subject:	RE: Floor Space Announcement

Fair enough.  I know you have much bigger issues to contend with right now.  We can be patient.

In the long run, I feel like this issue needs to be addressed for us to return to the vision of trying to breakdown the operating company silos and run an integrated gas logistics group.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Horton, Stanley
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 5:12 PM
To:	Corman, Shelley; Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	McCarty, Danny
Subject:	RE: Floor Space Announcement

Calm down.  The operative word is it has been put on hold.  These are not normal times.  No one saw this coming or we could have planned better.  Give us a few days to figure everything out.  We just made the decision today to preserve cash while we were waiting to see what was going to happen.  Thanks for your cooperation which I desperately need right now.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corman, Shelley
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 4:07 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Horton, Stanley; McCarty, Danny
Subject:	Floor Space Announcement

I was very disappointed to not have any advance warning about the announcement that construction on 41 has been put on hold for financial reasons.

The Gas Logistics team was "relocated" off the 41st floor on October 5.  Prior to the move, we had a very efficient, open configuration that let us work together as a unified team.

After the move, we are located on 3 different floors.   Besides the general impact on team unity, this move also means that our evening staff work alone on separate floors, rather than in a group.  It means fewer individuals to cover customer calls.  It means having more equipment to cover the day to day business.   I have worked hard to calm the team that this arrangement is just temporary and that we will eventually be put back together as a team.

Prior to our move I constantly questioned whether our move was necessary.  I asked about smaller, more practical changes to fit more people on the floor.  And, I specifically asked about whether Enron issues might impact the groups desire to continue to spend $7-$10 million -- even as I reluctantly packed up my boxes.

I hope you can appreciate that the current seating arrangement is a serious issue for my team and one that generates constant questions as my staff meetings.  Finding out  that we moved off of 41 for no reason at an all-employee floor meeting undermines my team's faith in my leadership.


??? Yo Sweets, thought you might want to see these.? I also just replied and
gave her your email address but you may want to contact her directly
yourself.? Tu Esposa

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephanie Owens [mailto:ksowens8@iwl.net]
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 9:20 PM
To: zwharton@dawray.com
Subject: Wedding photos

Hey Zo...

So, you got a new job?? I didn't know.? Congratulations!? I guess you are
just getting adjusted.? Well, I'm about to have to get readjusted when I go
back to work in a week or so.? I'm ready though.

Martin said you had a good time on your honeymoon (aside from the big bruise
on your ass).? I did the same thing in New Braunfels several years ago.? It
looked worse than it felt.? Oh, could you give me Martin's email address at
work?? Kevin keeps meaning to get back with him about his father's
employment situation.? I'll make sure he does that tomorrow.

I'm sending some wedding photos.? I'll have to send only a few at a time, so
you will see other messages from me.? Let me know if you want to have any of
them printed up.

Steph

?
 - hereshecomes.jpg
 - zowalking.jpg
 - takingvows.jpg
 - closeupvows1.jpg
 - closeupvows2.jpg
 - almostover.jpg
 - mrandmrs.jpg


Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-yh01.mx.aol.com (rly-yh01.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.33]) by air-yh03.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 17:04:05 -0400
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by rly-yh01.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 17:03:28 -0400
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66])	by postmaster.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/external_corp-1.08) with ESMTP id f3DL3H609359	for <vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 16:03:17 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.38])	by mailman.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/corp-1.05) with ESMTP id f3DL3GL10243	for <vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 16:03:16 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id <Tac1c0a265a52e4ca861b@nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com> for <vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 16:03:16 -0500
Subject: SIAM invitation
To: vkaminski@aol.com
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3  March 21, 2000
Message-ID: <OFC8FFB164.EC01A787-ON86256A2D.0073A894@enron.com>
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 22:03:22 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.6 |December 14, 2000) at 04/13/2001 03:59:09 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2001
10:03 PM ---------------------------

"William Fitzgibbon" <fitz@math.uh.edu> on 03/13/2001 08:45:57 PM

To:   <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:   <elizabet@math.uh.edu>
Subject:  SIAM invitation

Dear Dr. Kaminski

here is an email invitation for teh SIAM event.  A hard copy will follow

Dr. V. Kaminski
Enron
P.O. Box 1188
Houston, Texas 77251-1188

Dear Dr. Kaminski

March 12, 2001

I am writing to formalize your invitation to attend, participate, and speak
in the SIAM Southwest Regional Mathematics in Industry Workshop.   A time
span of thirty minutes is being allotted to invited talks with an
additional
ten minutes or so for discussion.  The workshop, funded under the auspices
of a National Science Foundation grant to SIAM will not be a standard
applied mathematics event with representatives from industry, academe, and
governmental agencies presenting their latest research results.  Instead
the
meeting will emphasize the mathematics and technology currently applied to
the projects of industry and governmental laboratories.  Additionally the
event will focus upon the mechanisms facilitating interaction and
collaboration between the academy, industry, and government laboratories.

The workshop will be held at the University of Houston Hilton Hotel, April
27-28.  Funds will be available to support both travel expenses and the
cost
of food and lodging of invited speakers.  We will be happy to make travel
arrangements on this end if so desired.

We hope that you can accept our invitation.  If this is the case please
furnish us with a title,  a short abstract, and a list of the necessary
equipment for your presentation.

We look forward to seeing you at the University of Houston.

Sincerely

W. Fitzgibbon


> Subject: FW: Fw: Just the facts
>
>
>
> For those who already have children past this age, this is  hilarious.
> For those who have children nearing this age, this is a warning.
> For those who have not yet had children, this is birth control.
> The following came from an anonymous mother in Austin, TX (poor  woman)
> Things I've learned from my children (Honest and No Kidding):
> 1. A king size waterbed holds enough water to fill a 2,000 sq  foot
> house 4 inches deep.
> 2. If you spray hair spray on dust bunnies and run over them with
> roller blades, they can ignite,
> 3. A 3-year-old's voice is louder than 200 adults in a crowded
> restaurant.
> 4. If you hook a dog leash over a ceiling fan, the motor is not strong
> enough to rotate a 42 pound boy wearing Batman underwear and a superman
> cape. It is strong enough, however, to spread paint on all four walls of a
> 20X20 foot room.
> 5. You should not throw baseballs up when the ceiling fan is on.
> When using the ceiling fan as a bat, you have to throw the ball up a few
> times before you get a hit. A ceiling fan can hit a baseball a long way.
> 6. The glass in windows (even double pane) doesn't stop a baseball hit
> by a ceiling fan.
> 7. When you hear the toliet flush and the words "Uh-oh", it's already
> too late.
> 8. Brake fluid mixed with Clorox makes smoke, and lots of it.
> 9. A six-year-old can start a fire with a flint rock even though a
> 36-year-old man says they can only do it in the movies. A magnifing glass
> can start a fire even on an overcast day.
> 10. Certain Lego's will pass through the digestive tract of a
> four-year-old.
> 11. Play Dough and Microwave should never be used in the same sentence.
> 12. Super glue is forever.
> 13. No matter how much Jell-O you put in a swimming pool you still can't
> walk on water.
> 14. Pool filters do not like Jell-O.
> 15. VCR's do not eject PB&J sandwiches even though TV commercials show
> they do.
> 16. Garbage bags do not make good parachutes.
> 17. Marbles in gas tanks make lots of noise when driving.
> 18. You probably do not want to know what that odor is.
> 19. Always look in the oven before you turn it on. Plastic toys do not
> like ovens.
> 20. The fire department in Austin has a 5 minute response time.
> 21. The spin cycle on the washing machine does not make earth worms
> dizzy.
> It will however make cats dizzy and cats throw up twice their body weight
> when dizzy.
>
>


The following attachments relate to the last two agenda items for tomorrow's
call.

Alan C.


All:

Attached is our memo on Day 10 of the trial.

Kimberly A. Curry
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P
2000 K Street, N.W.
Suite 500
(202) 828-7623 (phone)
(202) 857-2107 (fax)
kcurry@bracepatt.com

 - #143116 v1 - MEMO DAY 10.doc


At our meeting in San Francisco yesterday a group of you asked we
re-publish our memorandum regarding the subpoena power of California
legislative committee. Here is a slightly edited version.

1. What is the basis of a  Legislative Committee's Subpoena Power?

Authority:   Government Code Section 9401, provides that "a subpoena
requiring the attendance of any witness before the Senate, Assembly, or a
committee may be issued by the President of the Senate, Speaker of the
Assembly, or the chairman of any committee before whom the attendance of the
witness is desired if permission has been secured from the rules committee
of the respective house."

Govt. Code Section 9402 provides that a subpoena is sufficient if it "(a)
states whether the proceeding is before the Senate, Assembly or a committee.
(b) is addressed to the witness [presumably the custodian of records when
documents are sought]. (c) requires the attendance of the witness at a time
and place certain and (d) is signed by the President of the Senate, Speaker
of the Assembly or chairman of the committee before whom attendance of the
witness is desired."

Contempt Power:  If the witness does not appear or refuses to testify or
"neglects or refuses ... to produce upon reasonable notice any material and
proper books, papers or document sin his possession or under his control, he
has committed a contempt."  Govt. Code Section 9405.   If the contempt is
committed while the Legislature is in session, Govt. Code Section 9407
provides that the committee shall report the contempt to the Senate or
Assembly "for such action as may be deemed necessary by the Senate or
Assembly."  If the Legislature is not in session, "the superior court in and
for the county in which any inquiry, investigation hearing or proceeding
[is] held ... may compel the ... production of books, papers, documents and
accounts, as required by the subpoena issued by the committee, on the filing
by the committee of a petition to the court asking that the witness be so
compelled."

Govt. Code Section 9409 provides that "any witness neglecting or refusing to
attend in obedience to subpoena may be arrested...."  It is unclear how this
provision would or could be applied to a subpoena issued to the custodian of
records of a non-resident company.

Motion to Quash Subpoena: California courts have held, under C.C.P. Section
1985, that a motion to quash is the procedurally appropriate method of
testing the validity of a subpoena duces tecum.  See e.g. People ex rel.
Dept. of Public Works v. Younger (1970) 5 Cal.App.3d 575.  My research has
revealed no case in which a subpoena issued by a legislative committee has
been challenged by a motion to quash, but, as noted above, there appear to
be only a very few cases interpreting Govt. Code 9401 et seq.   Therefore,
it appears that a superior court may be able to grant a motion to quash a
subpoena issued by a legislative committee (assuming that we want to take
the risk of state court jurisdiction).

In one early case, the Court of Appeal held that the contempt order and
accompanying affidavit issued by the Court upon the request of a Senate
Committee were fatally defective.  Ex Parte McLain (1950) 99 Cal.App.2d 274.
In McLain, the Senate Interim Committee on Social Welfare served upon Mr.
McLain, the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of a corporation a subpoena
calling for the production of various books, papers and documents.  Mr.
McLain appeared before the committee but refused to answer questions or
produce the documents.  Upon representation of the Committee, the Superior
Court issued an order directing Mr. McLain to produce the documents.  Mr.
McLain again appeared before the Committee and again refused to produce the
documents at which point, an affidavit was filed in Superior Court stating:

"That, based upon evidence in its possession, the said Senate Interim
Committee has determined that each of the books, papers, and documents
specified in said subpoena duces tecum is material to the matters now under
investigation by the said Senate Interim Committee, and the production of
such books, papers and documents is necessary in order to enable said Senate
Interim Committee properly to perform the duties imposed upon it and to
report to the Senate of the State of California pursuant to said Senate
Resolution No. 162." and "That each of the books, papers and documents
specified in said subpoena duces tecum is material to the matters now under
investigation by the said Senate Interim Committee and that the production
of such books, papers and documents is necessary in order to enable said
Senate Interim Committee properly to perform the duties imposed upon it and
to report to the Senate of the State of California pursuant to said Senate
Resolution No. 162."

The Superior Court found Mr. McLain guilty of contempt and ordered him
committed to the sheriff until he produced the records.  The Court of
Appeals found that the order and affidavit were defective because "a witness
who is otherwise orderly and respectful cannot be adjudged guilty of
contempt unless the order affirmatively sets forth the materiality and
pertinency of the books and papers called for.  In cases of constructive
contempt, as is this, not only the order but also the affidavit upon which
it is based must sufficiently charge the alleged facts constituting the
offense."  McLain at 276.

This holding appears to be somewhat consistent with cases interpreting
C.C.P. 1985, which hold that the subpoena and affidavits must allege
material facts rather than conclusory statements.  See e.g. Grannis v. Board
of Medical Examiners (1971) 19 Cal.App.3d 551.

However, cases interpreting C.C.P. 1985 also require the subpoena to
demonstrate a level of specificity, materiality and relevance to be held
proper.  See e.g. Pacific Auto Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (1969) 273
Cal.App.2d 61.  It is unclear, but arguable that subpoenas issued by
legislative committees will be held to this same standard.

2.  What is the likely impact of a legislative committee subpoena issued
against Enron for out-of-state Enron documents?

 There is little case law interpreting Govt. Code 9401 et seq. and the Govt.
Code reporters cross reference to the Code of Civil Procedure Sections on
issuance of subpoenas (C.C.P. 1985, et seq.).  Therefore, it is likely that
the provisions of both the Govt. Code and the C.C.P. will govern the
issuance and enforceability of a subpoena issued by a legislative committee.
Accordingly we use these provisions to analyze this question.

 (a)  Subpoenas against out-of-state residents under C.C.P. 1985 et
seq.

C.C.P. 1989 is entitled "Residency requirements for attendance of witnesses"
and provides that "A witness, including a witness specified in subdivision
(b) of Section 1987, is not obliged to attend as a witness before any court,
judge, justice or any other officer, unless the witness is a resident within
the state at the time of service."

However, there is a statutory limitation on the residency requirement
imposed by Section 1989.  Section 1987.3 provides "[w]hen a subpoena duces
tecum is served upon a custodian of records or other qualified witness as
provided in Article 4 (commencing with Section 1560) of Chapter 2 of
Division 11 of the Evidence Code, and his personal attendance is not
required by the terms of the subpoena, Section 1989 shall not apply."
(Evade. Code 1650 lays out the terms for compliance with a subpoena for
business records where the business is "neither a party nor the place where
any cause of action is alleged to have arisen.")

On commentator noted the following with respect to C.C.P. 1987.3:

"The rule limiting subpoenas to California "residents" (C.C.P. 1989) does
not apply to a subpoena duces tecum served on custodians of records unless
their personal attendance is required. See C.C.P. 1987.3; Amoco Chem. Co. v.
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 554, 561 fn.
9.  Thus, a nonresident custodian of business records may be required to
respond to a subpoena duces tecum served upon him or her while present in
California, by producing the records in accordance with Cal. Evid. Code 1560
(delivering copies of the records and accompanying affidavit to the court
clerk)... [However], C.C.P. 1987.3 probably applies only where the
nonresident custodian is employed by a business entity subject to California
jurisdiction. Otherwise, there would be no way for the court to enforce
compliance with a subpoena served on a nonresident.  See Amoco Chem. Co. v.
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, supra."

Werner, Fairbanks & Epstein, Rutter Group, California Practice Guide: Civil
Procedure & Trials at 1.57-58

Moreover, in one unpublished case, Allee v. King (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 1081,
the court held that it lacked power to compel a nonresident defendant to
produce original out-of-state documents at trial.  In so holding, the court
stated that:

"even though King apparently voluntarily attended the trial, his presence
does not confer jurisdiction on the court to oblige him to deliver the
out-of-state documents.   Although section 1989 uses the word "witness" and
does not refer to documents, it has long been presumed under common law that
documents in other states are outside the court's territorial jurisdiction,
so that a court will allow the use of copies or other secondary evidence
instead of originals.  (See, e.g., Heinz v. Heinz (1946) 73 Cal.App.2d 61,
66, 165 P.2d 967, and cases cited therein.)   The recognition that
out-of-state documents are not subject to the court's process is in
conformity with the general rule under common law that, absent a statute
properly conferring broader powers, the extent of a state's subpoena power
and its accompanying subpoena duces tecum power is coterminous with its
borders.  (See 97 C.J.S., Witnesses, S 17, p. 367, S 23, p. 375, S 25, p.
380;  81 Am.Jur.2d, Witnesses, S 8, p. 32, S 14, p. 39.)

However, the Allee court notes that the "state-border" limitation on
subpoena power has not been extended to local branches of national
corporations who are subpoenaed to deliver documents which are out-of-state.
Therefore, even under Allee, if a subpoena was issued to an  Enron entity
within California that possessed responsive documents, that Enron entity may
be obligated to respond.  See Boal v. Price Waterhouse & Co. (1985) 165
Cal.App.3d 806.

Therefore, if a subpoena is issued which requires the attendance of an
out-of-state officer of Enron, Enron has a very good argument that that
witness is not obligated to attend under C.C.P. 1989.  It also seems
probable that, under Amoco and Allele cited above, if a subpoena is served
on an Enron custodian of records who is employed by a non-California Enron
entity, the subpoena may be invalid.  However, if a subpoena seeking the
production of documents is served on the custodian of records (or someone
similarly situated) who is employed by an Enron entity that possesses
responsive documents and is subject to personal jurisdiction in California,
that Enron entity most likely is obligated to produce the documents.  While
it is an open question, Enron can certainly argue that the custodian of
records employed by an Enron entity in California would only be required to
produce the Enron documents in the possession of the Enron California
entity.  (This question is addressed somewhat in the commentary on the
C.C.P. 2020 statutory scheme, see below, but is still open.)

 (b)  Subpoenas against out-of-state residents under C.C.P. 2020 et
seq.

An additional threshold question regarding the territorial effect of this
subpoena concerns whether it is should be considered a deposition subpoena.
The question is:  If the legislative subpoena was treated as a "deposition
subpoena," would a court deciding the enforceability of a legislative
subpoena treat Enron as a "party" or as a "non-party"?

The rules governing the reach of discovery in California are obviously
different for the two.  The deposition of a party or party-affiliated
witness may be noticed (without a subpoena) for a place within 75 miles of
the witness' residence.  It is unclear how a court would resolve this issue.
After all, if a court was resolving the issue at all, an Enron entity will
have appeared before it. and would be a "party."  However, it seems
moderately more likely that the court would treat Enron's obligations under
the legislative committee subpoena as similar to its obligations if it was
served with a "non-party" subpoena.

There are three types of "deposition subpoena":  a "testimony only subpoena"
(requires only the attendance and testimony of the witness), a "business
records subpoena" (requires only the production of business records) and a
"records and testimony subpoena" (requires both -- also formerly called
subpoena duces tecum).  The second of these is the most relevant to Enron.

The attendance of an non party out-of-state witness or the production of
documents can be compelled only under the law of the place where the
deposition is to be taken.  C.C.P. 2026 (b)(2).  Specifically, C.C.P.
2026(b)(2) provides "If the deponent is not a party to the action or an
officer, director, managing agent, or employee of a party, a party serving a
deposition notice under this section shall use any process and procedures
required and available under the laws of the state, territory, or insular
possession where the deposition is to be taken to compel the deponent to
attend and to testify, as well as to produce any document or tangible thing
for inspection, copying, and any related activity."

Some states issue subpoenas routinely, some require a showing of materiality
or relevancy, and some require a commission from the court where the action
is pending.    This question will depend on the law of the state when the
custodian of records resides.

Regarding the question of whether the service of a deposition subpoena on an
in-state custodian of records would compel the production of out-of-state
documents.  Weil & Brown, Rutter Group, California Practice Guide: Civil
Procedure Before Trial at 5:540.4 notes:

"It is unclear whether service of a "business records" subpoena on a
nonparty corporation in California compels production of its records located
outside the state. ... C.C.P. 2020(d) requires that the subpoena be directed
to the records "custodian" (or someone authorized to certify the records).
Whether "custodian" requires actual custody of the records is unclear. If it
does, serving an officer or agent in California would not compel production
of business records located elsewhere. The result is different where a
"records and testimony" subpoena is used. That procedure extends to records
in control of the subpoenaed party, not merely in his or her custody."

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Hello all,

	Joe Hartsoe wanted me to pass this along as an FYI.  Yesterday, President Bush nominated Joe T. Kelliher to a post within FERC.  The press release can be found at:  http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/10/20011016-10.html .

Mike V.


Please find attached a spreadsheet noting the days of the month when you have
been invited  to go to lunch with Carrie Hollomon.   If the days conflict
with something you already have scheduled please call me at 3-6279 and we can
work out another date.  Be sure and mark your calendars for each month as
this does follow through to July.

Thanks
Chantelle


Mike,

Please, take a look

http://www.syncrasy.com/
Vince


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/08/2001 07:18
AM ---------------------------
From: Zionette Vincent on 05/07/2001 01:50 PM
To: Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/Enron@EnronXGate, Christian
Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Gonzalez/Enron@EnronXGate, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wendy
Conwell/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul Radous/Enron@EnronXGate, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Sacks/Enron@EnronXGate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve J
Hall/ETOL/EU/Enron@ENRON, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Keesler/ENRON@enronXgate, Yolanda
Pena/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: Legal Credit Meeting

Reminder

Legal Credit Meeting

Wednesday, May 9, 2001
10:00 AM - 11:00 AM
EB38c2

Thanks,
"Z" (Zionette) Vincent
x.54858


Eric,

The Carthage meters to report on EOL are listed below:

Tennessee				4603001
Texas Gas (Firm take away only)	4021021
Koch Midstream				4602001
Koch Gateway				4601003
Lonestar Header				4609001
Reliant					4082006
EPGT Texas Pipeline (PGE Texas)	4615002

There are a couple of meters in the hub, but the capacity is limited.  So, we should not list them.  Let me know if you have any questions or need additional info.

D


Hey Ben!? I e-mailed you. Now you're supposed  to e-mail me back!? I'm
waiting! Love, CyberMom


Don/Lloyd,

Fyi,  Please advise.

Thanks,
Johnny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Michael Byrne <MichaelB@acespower.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Michael+20Byrne+20+3CMichaelB+40acespower+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 3:29 PM
To:	Palmer, Johnny
Cc:	Kevin Presto (E-mail)
Subject:	Your Offer.

John and Kevin,

I have carefully reviewed your offer and worked the numbers several times to
compare ENRON and ACES.  With my raise, my salary and annual bonus is raised
to a point that makes your offer just not quite enough.  Add in the cost of
living increase for Houston and I would be behind the curve.  I have worked
the numbers and in order to be fair I would need $87,000 in base salary
along with the $10,000 signing bonus as well as at least 3 months severance
pay in case things do not work out.  I mention this because the annual bonus
is subjective and may or may not happen.  If you feel that this is
excessive, I understand.  I will be worth the extra money, especially after
this summer.  I will be learning to trade PJM, NYPP, and MAAC.  I will also
have the opportunity to deal more with SERC and FRCC as well.  I am willing
to consider your reply to this and will be able for discussion tomorrow
evening.  I will mail back this counter offer as well.

Thank you for the opportunity and I look forward to speaking with you soon.

Michael J. Byrne
ACES Power Marketing.


Thanks for the report.  The level of detail was on target.  Let me know when
you want to discuss comp issues.

Adam_Umanoff%ENRON@eott.com on 04/29/2001 12:23:55 PM
To: Stanley_Horton%Enron.com%Eott@EOTT.COM
cc:

Subject: EWC - Weekly Update/Week Ending 27 April

1.  Aura.
     -  Received revised bid from UBS which Metts describes as "real."  UBS
will now commence detailed 6-8 week due diligence on EWC (at Enron's
expense if deal busts).  Confidence re: UBS' ability to execute remains
mixed.
     -  LJM (Fastow) interest continues, but unclear how parallel process
can be run.  Umanoff concerned about conflict when management assists
seller as part of UBS deal but assists buyer as part of LJM deal.
     -  Now that '01 numbers scrubbed, in process of revising '02 financial
projections based on detailed internal review (as of December, 2000, '02
EBITDA projected at approximately $115mm; up from 1CE '01 projection of
$78mm). This is unrealistic; I expect 2002 EBITDA in the $90-95mm range,
showing solid 15-20% EBITDA growth.

2.  M&A Activity.
     -  acquisition of assets of bankrupt Dutch blade manufacturer, Aerpac,
continues; we have closed on several assets and expect final closing in
May.
     -  sale of Greek operating projects to German buyer continues, but
execution uncertain.  Closing targeted for June 30.  Sale of Greek
development company also launched, with 2 parties expressing interest.

3.  2001 Commercial Activity.
     -  US backlog remains firm.  Projected demand continues to exceed our
projected turbine supply.  Key execution issue is confimation of
suitability of 1.5 MW turbine (primarily its gearbox) in more rigorous US
wind regimes.
     -  American Electric Power has provided indicative bid to purchase the
two Texas projects we have under development (Indian Mesa I and Clear Sky);
indicative bid price is attractive.  AEP has requested Enron Corp guaranty
of EWC's turbine warranty, like they have received on previous sales with
EWC.  Enron Corp guaranty is approved internally, but, in light of Aura,
we will continue to bargain for no Enron Corp credit support. Finally, debt
financing expected to close on IMI in May and debt circled on Clear Sky in
June.  Turbine suitability due diligence is key pacing item for debt
closing.
     -  European backlog remains firm, expect for Spanish sales of 750kw
turbine, which remains soft. EWC attended Hannover Fair last week, the
largest industrial trade show in Europe.  Our exhibit was very well
received.  CEO of German competitor, Enercon, approached Umanoff to discuss
IP issues (Enercon is currently barred from US market on patent
infringement grounds).

4.  HR Issues.
     -  US has lost O&M director and 2 key commercial employees have
expressed concerns.  Need to finalize retention program (Umanoff to discuss
with Horton early in week).
     -  Key recruiting initiatives are: GM Spain; head of global
procurement/blade MFG; European GC.  Umanoff would also like to re-visit
hiring US GM/MD, as day-to-day US operations require more detailed
oversight than Umanoff is currently providing; not clear if we can recruit
for this position in the midst of Aura.

Stan - for the future, please let me know whether this is the right level
of focus.  Talk with you soon. Adam


Have you sent in the sign up sheet yet?  Who is that one person?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Nicole Mendez                           02/16/2001 08:58 AM

To: Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pam Becton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marnie
Lamb/NA/Enron@Enron, Brad Carey/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tammy Barta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Best/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa King/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rosalyn Lum/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rufino
Doroteo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laynie East/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Hardy/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron, Marnie Lamb/NA/Enron@Enron, Kristi
Fredericks/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan Rance/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian K
Dawson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Kang/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Outlook Training

So far I only have one person that would like to attend this afternoon's
class.  Is there anyone else that would like to go?   Please let me know as
soon as soon as possible as I will be sending the sign up sheet for today's
class shortly.

Nicole
---------------------- Forwarded by Nicole Mendez/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 08:56
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Nicole Mendez                           02/15/2001 10:56 AM

To: Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pam Becton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marnie
Lamb/NA/Enron@Enron, Brad Carey/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tammy Barta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Best/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa King/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rosalyn Lum/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rufino
Doroteo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laynie East/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Hardy/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron, Marnie Lamb/NA/Enron@Enron, Kristi
Fredericks/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan Rance/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian K
Dawson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Kang/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Outlook Training

Please let me know if you would like to attend any of the following classes.
I will send in a cumulative list.

Nicole
---------------------- Forwarded by Nicole Mendez/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 10:54
AM ---------------------------

Magdelena Cruz
02/15/2001 09:59 AM
To: Nicole Mendez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Outlook Training

Nicole --

Below are the dates I have available for training:

February 16th  2:30-3:30pm EB564
February 20th  8:30-9:30am EB564
February 20th  1:00-2:00pm EB572
Februarty 23rd  10-11:00am EB572

To register for a class, please email me with the below information:

Class:
Date of Class:
Time:
Your name:
SSN#
Location:
Ext:
Company #
Cost Center
Manager's Name

If you have any questions, please call me.
Thanks,
Maggie
x3-9571 or x3-1816


eSource presents Piranha Web training

Piranha Web offers an online connection to complete company analysis via
content that includes Disclosure, Worldscope, Datastream and I/B/E/S.  The
product is designed to allow users to get complete company fundamental
financials, earnings estimates, and market data.

Training Agenda Includes:
? General Introduction.
? Basic ticker query building

Attend our Piranha Clinic:

May 11 -    9:00 -10:00 AM  EB572

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928
Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations

http://esource.enron.com


Lucy,

 Here are the rentrolls:

 Open them and save in the rentroll folder.  Follow these steps so you don't
misplace these files.

 1.  Click on Save As
 2.  Click on the drop down triangle under Save in:
 3.  Click on the  (C): drive
 4.  Click on the appropriate folder
 5.  Click on Save:

Phillip


you will have 4 tix.  make your plans

Liz M Taylor
02/07/2001 09:08 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Destiny's Child

John,

Any word on the tickets?  If I can get just four that would be just fine.  If
not, please no worries.  Many Thanks,  Liz


Don:

The questions that I was unable to answer for Excelon (PECO) during the
Lincoln site visit are as follows:

1.  What is the gas consumption per unit during start-up?

2.  What is the reference # for the 2nd ComEd Interconnection Feasibility
Study?  Is this document on deal bench?

3.  Do any other parties have a right to interconnect to the Project's gas
pipeline lateral?

My input to these questions is:

1.  None.  I am not familiar with this area.

2.  I saw this 2nd study is out on deal bench at least a week ago.  As long
as it wasn't removed, it should be there.   I do not know the reference #.

3.  I do not believe that any other parties have a right to connect to the
gas lateral owned by Des Plaines LLC.  (In fact,  I believe that we are
statutorily prevented from supplying gas to other end users - Des Plaines LLC
is neither an interstate pipeline nor a gas LDC).  Please confirm my opinion
with Stuart/Chris Meyer to make sure that we have not granted any
interconnection rights to Northern Border/Peoples.

Call me to discuss.

Fred


John:
We are trying to set up a meeting tomorrow to discuss the Wheatland
switchyard issues.  We will have someone from legal, Mitch Robinson and Don
Miller attending for Enron.  Please let me know what time works best for you
for tomorrow morning.  Thanks!
Ben Rogers
(713) 853-7998


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:54 PM
To:	Keiser, John; Gilbert, Steve
Subject:	FW: template for Lay Reviews

opps, forgot the attachements

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:53 PM
To:	Keiser, John; Gilbert, Steve
Subject:	template for Lay Reviews

Please change EGS to ETS.  Let me know if you have any questions.  Lets use the Arial font.

Thanks

Tracy


Dear Vince,

I've attached my resume. Thank you so much for your help. I really
appreciate it.

Best regards,

Vicky

>From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
>To: vjwindsor@hotmail.com
>CC: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
>Subject: Re: From Vicky Windsor
>Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:55:57 -0500
>
>
>Vicky,
>
>Please, send me your resume.
>
>I shall forward it to a number of employees of  Enron in London
>with my strongest recommendation. I shall send you  the list
>of names. The resume will make it easier for me to
>identify good targets.
>
>Please, make sure you will contact me if there is no reaction.
>People here are very busy and, as you know, things fall through the cracks.
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>"Vicky Windsor" <vjwindsor@hotmail.com> on 10/11/2000 04:49:56 AM
>
>To:   vkamins@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  From Vicky Windsor
>
>
>Dear Vince,
>
>How are you? Well I hope.
>
>I hope you don't mind me writing to you. You may remember that 5 months ago
>I left Risk Publications and moved to a charity. Having been here for only
>a
>few months, I have decided that this job is not for me (I miss the buzz of
>a
>corporate office) and I have decided to move back into the corporate
>sector.
>
>Because of my previous experience and knowledge of the energy sector, I am
>very interested in moving into this area. I have always thought that it
>would be great to work for Enron because it is such a dynamic company and I
>am planning to approach the London office to discuss any opportunities,
>which might be available. I am particularly interested in product marketing
>and research, although I am very open-minded at the moment. I wondered
>whether you could recommend the right person to speak to in London.
>
>I know that you are incredibly busy, but any help you can give me would be
>fantastic Vince.
>
>Thanks and best regards,
>
>
>Vicky Windsor
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>http://profiles.msn.com.
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - CV to Vince Kaminski 13 Oct.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 04:44
PM ---------------------------

"Germany, Mary/COR" <mgermany@CH2M.com> on 08/07/2000 12:34:28 PM
To: "'chris.germany@enron.com'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Pictures

Here's how I spent my weekend.  What did you do?

Mary

 - OnTheLift.jpg
 - MaryCopper.jpg
 - MaryFrisco.jpg
 - MaryTrail.jpg
 - MaryTrail2.jpg
 - MaryTrail3.jpg


I just finished faxing everything.  Give it some time.  Your fax was busy for a while.
But let me know which ones you don't get.  Thanks, Gloria

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Staab, Theresa
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:19 PM
To:	Barkowsky, Gloria G.
Subject:	CIG invoices

Gloria,
Is there any way you could copy and send overnight to me the CIG invoices for the 33175000 contract from May, 2000 through January, 2001?

I am helping Darla and Megan reconcile the Citizens account.  It is changing over to Kinder Morgan effective Dec. 1 and we need to reconcile this account rather quickly.

I printed all other invoices on the Internet from CIG's website but they only go back 9 months.

Let me know if this is possible or where else I might find these.

Thanks,
Theresa


Here is my first draft.


Please be advised that the above referenced meeting has been rescheduled to
Wednesday, February 14, 2001 in EB2831 @ 4:00 p.m.  Thanks.

Emy C. Geraldo
3-5391
Enron Corp.


The ticket numbers are 108210, 108058.

-Eric


Since it will not be possible to reach Ken Lay before tomorrow, Jim advises
that the actions will not be taken before Monday morning India time.  In the
interim, your approval and comments on the attached draft statement/Q&As
would be appreciated.  I will be out of town until mid-afternoon Sunday, but
checking e-mails and can be reached on my cellular phone (281-948-7273).

Thanks,

John


Here is the Rochester model.
Ben


We still getting to office at 2.30p?

Michelle tells me their law firm is drafting changes to agreement as we speak. Probably won't have anything tell late tonight.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Jessica,

I'm sorry I never got in touch with you last weekend, but I had the wrong
phone number with me and didn't have enough brain power to think of using
Information.  I don't think I would have been much fun anyway since I pretty
much just ended up sleeping the whole weekend.  In fact, I fell asleep in the
car on the ride back to my sister's house after the game and my parents
decided to just leave me in the car.  I think I was probably out there for an
hour before I woke up (needless to say I was very confused).  Anyway, hope
things are going well for you and Clay.  I know everything must be kind of
crazy for both of you right now with finals coming up and all of the
interviewing you've both no doubt been doing.

I really want to get a chance to see you and chat...I don't feel like we've
had a good one in forever.  I will be in Austin over Thanksgiving for the
game, so we could try to touch base then if you're going to be in town.  If
not, I'm sure I can manage at least one weekend trip during December if
there's a good weekend for you.  Just drop me  a line when you get a chance
and let me know what's new with you.

Susan

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  JesPulliam@aol.com                           10/25/2000 03:55 PM

To: <sscott5@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: hello!!

Susie-just wanted to say hello and see how your trip went!!  Hope you had a
ball.  Also, I wanted to let you know that Clay and I are having family and
friends over for food and beer after the game this weekend and would love to
see you.  We are at 1810 Palma Plaza--if you take Enfield towards Mopac, take
a left at the light at Hartford, take a right on Palma Plaza, we are the last
(blue) duplex on the right before Mopac; our half faces Palma Plaza and the
other half faces Mopac.  If you forget these directions--my number is
512-322-0692.

Jessica


Gerald,
Any more info on this contract??

Thanks,
Russell


Check this out if you haven't already

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moon, Eric
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:28 AM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	FW: Why Palestenians throw rocks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Tami, Eric and Jake Moon" <etjmoon@prodigy.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:58 AM
To:	Julie Turner; Papa; Moon, Eric; Granny; Frank Jimenez
Subject:	Fw: Why Palestenians throw rocks

Subject: FW: Why Palestenians throw rocks

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> --- <<ATT279523.txt>>  <<WHYPALES.MPE>>
>

 - ATT279523.txt
 - WHYPALES.MPE


But do we need it immediately? Can we file later for retail authority?
--------------------------
Jim Steffes
Enron


I received a message today from one of the brokers at ED&F Mann, who said he
was waiting on our payment for a Palo Verde futures contract for April. I
remember something like this happening last month, and I remember you two
coming to the rescue, which is why I'm asking for your assistance. If either
of you get a chance on Monday, let's get together and figure out why this
hasn't been paid, or maybe why it HAS been paid and not received.

I believe the deal in question is 531782 - Long Term Southwest buys from
Avista for the month of April, price $196, trade date 2/26. Doesn't this seem
eerily reminiscent of the last contract that ED&F Mann didn't receive payment
on? Was it Avista that time too?

The contact at ED&F Mann is Martin, and his number is (212) 566-9329. Just
let me know when you have a moment to talk.

Thanks,
Kate


I'm going to see Mickey Mouse in Florida next week.  My brother is taking me
since I have failed at obtaining a wife and kid(s).

Anne Bertino@EES
04/04/2001 09:32 AM
To: Rhonda Short/HOU/EES@EES, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Happy Birthday

Does next week look good?

---------------------- Forwarded by Anne Bertino/HOU/EES on 04/04/2001 09:30
AM ---------------------------
From: Kimberly S Olinger@ECT on 04/04/2001 08:22 AM
To: Anne Bertino/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Happy Birthday

thank you!

We need to go have drinks sometime!  How does next week look?


I want the deep tissue massage. Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Brown, Michelle Y. - TP2MYB" <Mbrown@socalgas.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 3:34 PM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	Spa

http://www.aidathibiant.com/index3.html << File: http://www.aidathibiant.com/index3.html >>
Here is the link to the spa.  I've booked the four of us in for a massage at 3 pm.  Let me know if you'd like to try something other than the massage.
See you soon,
Michelle
Michelle Brown
Southern California Gas Company
(213) 244-3904 ph
(213) 244-8284 fax


Info from the press conference today

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/08/2001 11:51 AM -----

	"Allen, Stevan" <stevan.allen@edelman.com>
	02/08/2001 10:39 AM

		 To: "Beiser, Megan" <Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>, "''nplotkin@tfglobby.com' '"
<nplotkin@tfglobby.com>, "'Aaron Thomas (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<athomas@newenergy.com>, "'Andrea Weller (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<aweller@sel.com>, "'andrew Chau (E-mail) (E-mail) '" <anchau@shellus.com>,
"'Bill Chen (E-mail) (E-mail) '" <bchen@newenergy.com>, "'Douglas Oglesby
(E-mail) (E-mail) '" <doao@chevron.com>, "Fairchild, Tracy"
<tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>, "'Jeffrey Hanson (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<jeff.hanson@phaser.com>, "'jennifer Chamberlin (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<jnnc@chevron.com>, "'john Barthrop (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<jbarthrop@electric.com>, "'John Leslie (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<jleslie@luce.com>, "'Joseph Alamo (E-mail) (E-mail) '" <jalamo@enron.com>,
"''Michael Nelson' (E-mail) '" <mnelson@electric.com>, "'Mona Petrochka
(E-mail) '" <mpetroch@enron.com>, "'Peter Bray (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<pbray@newpower.com>, "'Rebecca Schlanert (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<rschlanert@electric.com>, "'Richard Counihan (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "''Robert Morgan' (E-mail) '"
<rmorgan@newenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail) (E-mail) '" <smara@enron.com>
		 cc: "Warner, Jami" <jami.warner@edelman.com>, "Manuel, Erica"
<Erica.Manuel@edelman.com>, "Fairchild, Tracy" <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>,
"Anderson, Kristin" <Kristin.Anderson@edelman.com>
		 Subject: AReM: Angelides News Conf

AReM Team:
The following is an overview from:

9 a.m., SACRAMENTO _ State Treasurer Phil Angelides
holds media briefing to discuss issuance of energy-related bonds, 915
Capitol
Mall, room 110. Contact: Colleen Beamish, 916-653-4052.

While we have not had time to analyze or digest in detail, here is what
Angelides said:

Angelides: Laid out what needs to be done for the Treasurer's office to
implement AB 1X and what is and isn't appropriate role of the state for
getting the IOUs solvent.

Angelides: "These will be largest (amount of) municipal bonds issued in
nation's history."

Angelides: Estimated bonds would be in $10 billion range. (This echoes what
he said in Jan. 5 news conference)

Angelides: Goal is to arrange short-term external financing by beginning of
March. This would account for about $2 billion. If they don't get that
amount by March 1, 2001, the State will tap into the General Fund.   (NOTE:
This appears to be different from the $2 billion he talked about last month
for the renewable energy and conservation load program -- the reserve fund
he would use to reduce the intereset paid to the consumers.)

Angelides: It is "fortunate" that this is happening when State of California
currently has a $5.8 billion surplus.

Angelides: By passing AB 1X, the State has "provided for stability on a
going forward basis" for the utilities.

Angelides: "The next step is for the utilities." -- i.e. - the ball is in
their court because the IOUs aren't now in a position where they necessarily
are going to be insolvent, so they have decisions to make. Do they want to
sell off transmission assets or do they want to pursue the bankruptcy
option?

Angelides: "A buyout, not a bailout makes sense." because it "would give
liquidity to the utilities."

Angelides: Announced he was assembling full financing team which would be in
place by Friday.

Angelides: Also said that before bonds could be issued, interim steps needed
to be taken. Specifically -- that DWR and PUC must reach an agreement on
what rates must be paid on power contracts.

On the phone were: * Michael Kahn;  Laura Holson (sp?);  Debra Feinstone
(sp?) -- All three listened in and did not participate.

We will be faxing handouts and news releases of this and other news
conferences to the team. If you don't receive them, please contact Kristin
Anderson at 916/442-2331 to request a fax.

PS - The Connell news conference has been postponed.

-----Original Message-----
From: Beiser, Megan
To: 'nplotkin@tfglobby.com'; Aaron Thomas (E-mail) (E-mail); Andrea Weller
(E-mail) (E-mail); andrew Chau (E-mail) (E-mail); Bill Chen (E-mail)
(E-mail); Douglas Oglesby (E-mail) (E-mail); Fairchild, Tracy; Jeffrey
Hanson (E-mail) (E-mail); jennifer Chamberlin (E-mail) (E-mail); john
Barthrop (E-mail) (E-mail); John Leslie (E-mail) (E-mail); Joseph Alamo
(E-mail) (E-mail); 'Michael Nelson' (E-mail); Mona Petrochka (E-mail); Peter
Bray (E-mail) (E-mail); Rebecca Schlanert (E-mail) (E-mail); Richard
Counihan (E-mail) (E-mail); 'Robert Morgan' (E-mail); Sue Mara (E-mail)
(E-mail)
Cc: Allen, Stevan; Warner, Jami; Manuel, Erica; Fairchild, Tracy; Anderson,
Kristin
Sent: 2/8/01 11:40 AM
Subject: Several Press Briefings in Sacramento today

AReM-ers,

It's a busy day today for press briefings as you can see from the
schedule below.  We'll be covering these events this morning and will
get news releases, press materials from all as well.

We will provide updates as soon as possible and get them out to you.

*********************

9 a.m., SACRAMENTO _ State Treasurer Phil Angelides
holds
media briefing to discuss issuance of energy-related bonds, 915 Capitol
Mall, room 110. Contact: Colleen Beamish, 916-653-4052.

9:30 a.m., SACRAMENTO _ Assembly Speaker Robert Hertzberg and others
discuss legislation to promote energy conservation and increase power
supplies, Capitol, room 317. Contact: Paul Hefner, 916-319-2408.

11:30 a.m., YUBA CITY _ Gov. Gray Davis discusses his plans to increase
electricity generating capacity in California, Sutter power plant
project,
5087-A South Township Rd. Contact: 916-445-4571.

Noon, SACRAMENTO _ Republican lawmakers hold news conference to discuss
failure of parent companies to keep their utility subsidiaries
sufficiently
solvent to serve the public interest, Capitol, room 1190. Contact: Wade
Teasdale, 916-445-3731.


Joe,

As we review all the options for Enron Japan (people and commodity/business
plays), we would like to see how you think it should be organized to
facilitate growth and have the biggest impact.  When you get a chance to
examine the EGM information and get your thoughts together, lets us know your
views and your view of the best way forward.  We have everyone thinking about
it and we are solidifying our own thoughts as well.

It will help with Morten Erik as well.

Thanks,
Mike


Ms. Buchanan:

Attached for your consideration is a draft of a Master Firm Purchase/Sale
Agreement between Enron North America Corp. and TrizecHahn.  Upon your
review, please give me a call to discuss any issues or questions you may
have regarding this matter.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


I made some changes to New Power.  Would you please send me a new purchase
and sales worksheet for Jan?

thanks


Can you please extend sitara deal ticket 16888 to the 15th?  14 dec. flowed
on this day.

Thanks
-Jackie-


We have some very sad news from State Senator Bruce McPherson. On Saturday
morning, his 27 year old son was murdered in San Francisco during an
attempted robbery. Hunter McPherson will be remembered during a  memorial
service in Aptos on Wednesday, November 21.

The family has also set up an athletic scholarship fund in his name. We have
additional information if you need it.

Please remember this wonderful family in your thoughts and prayers.

-Lang, Hansen, O'Malley & Miller


I have talked with the San Juan team and all are aware of the upcoming meeting.  The team leader is Tracy Kuehl but Chris Gaston, Jeff Grieder, Tom Murphy, Blackie Foutz who are on the team can all help with this project.  I will be out of the office until Feb. 5, 2001 but I can be reached by pager, 877-726-7034, or cell phone, 713-304-1021.  My pager has the capability of accepting alpha messages.  You can send them through Lotus Notes with the address of 8777267034@skytel.com.  Do not enter a subject.  Just type in the message area.  Please include you name at the end so I will know who it's from.  If you can set up a meeting after Feb. 5 (preferably Feb. 8 or 9) I would appreciate it so I can attend.

Ron M.

Jeffery Fawcett
01/24/2001 05:39 PM
To:	Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Eric Faucheaux/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team San-Juan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Ameramex Project- Bloomfield

Rick Moore with Ameramex called and said their project is moving forward- on a fairly expedited basis.  They've recently obtained a City of Farmington pledge of public funds (a precursor to a formal bond issue) to underpin the financing.

To refresh your memory, this project is another "trigeneration" project.  Ameramex will use the waste steam from the electric generation turbines to heat a hydroponic lettuce farm, as well as use the combustion carbon dioxide.  We've previously provided a route map and estimate (0.75 mi. of 4" pipe, $486K direct/indirect cost) to Ameramex.

Ameramex's financing deal is now dependent upon completion of the interconnect and commencement of service in approx. 7 months.  To this end, Ameramax has requested a walk through of the potential route and a revised (if necessary) estimate of the cost to interconnect.  There are several other issues to be dealt with here, including what is the final deal structure; including whether TW may possibly providing interim financing until the issuance of the muni bonds.

Rick Moore would like to get together with myself and representatives of operations and/or engineering to survey the route and decide on the ultimate design/configuration of facilities.  Depending on the outcome of the survey, he'd like a formal proposal for TW for financing the construction of the lateral and interconnect facilities.

Ron, since you provided all the prior facility planning support, I'd like for you to continue providing the liason support to TW Commercial on this project.  I'll also be calling on the San Juan Team to work with you and engineering to optimize the design/routing of this interconnect/lateral pipeline.  I'll work with the customer to set-up a site meeting when you return to work after 2/5/01.

To bring you and others up to speed, I've included a couple of the original email(s) giving a little more detail on the estimate and a map of the route:

Ronald Matthews
06/16/2000 03:32 PM
To:	Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Terry Galassini/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team San-Juan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Amerimex Energy Farms Project

Jeff,

I talked with the San Juan team and came up with a pipeline route to the proposed Energy Farms site located in S1/2  SE1/4  Sec. 13, T29N, R11W, and the NE1/2  NE1/4 Sec. 24, T29N, R11W all in San Juan County, NM.  Per the correspondence, Energy Farms is looking at a delivery around 15 MMcf/d.  The best approach to serving this load would be to take gas from the suction side of Bloomfield CS.  The 4" pipeline would start there a travel about 0.75 miles to the northwest section of the proposed site (see attached map).  A metering facility would be located at the beginning of the pipeline still inside of TW's property along with the other meter facilities.  Below is a breakdown of the facility cost.  Estimated costs are + 30% and would have to be refined.

0.75 miles of 4" pipeline & side valve		$286,500

4" orifice meter run w/ gallagher flow 		$199,900
conditioner, & flow control

						$486,400

There is a possibility that the meter facility costs could be lower by using an existing metering header system but a more detailed review would be required.  Please feel free to call if you have any questions.  I will send you a copy of the estimated costs for both the pipeline and measurement since they can't be attached.

Jeffery Fawcett
04/18/2000 11:37 AM
To:	Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Terry Galassini/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Amerimex Bloomfield Project

Attached see a note I sent to Rick Moore.  Rick works for a company called Amerimex.  Rick and I worked together in gas supply at EPNG ("the early years").  Amerimex is a developer of "trigeneration" projects.  In addition to the subject project for Bloomfield, another one is being considered for Santa Theresa, N.M.  If you recall, we were introduced to trigeneration when we were discussing an electric generation plant on the site of a hydroponic tomato greenhouse near Gallup.

Trigeneration is an environmentally friendly technology that utilizes the "byproducts" of electric generation.  "Cogeneration" refers to the process where waste heat/steam generated during the combustion of gas turbines is sold commercially (usually to manufacturing facilities) for plant purposes.  "Trigeneration," on the other hand, refers the process where not only is the waste heat/steam utilized, but also the carbon dioxide.  Therefore, trigeneration is a perfect fit for a greenhouse that requires both heat and carbon dioxide for the plants.

Amerimex has proposed a hydroponic lettuce greenhouse in the Bloomfield, N.M. area.  The facility, to be constructed turnkey by United Technologies, would have a nominal rating of 70 MW, resulting in a gas burn of about 15 MMcf/d.  The plant would require gas deliveries at approx. 500 psig.  The outtake power would be sold both locally and on the grid using a TriStates 69kv transmission line that is proximate to the site.  Given the "politically correct" nature of these facilities, the City of Farmington has agreed to fund construction with a $70MM bond.

As you can see, we're in the very earliest stages of conversation.  We'll keep the group posted on progress.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 04/18/2000 10:38 AM ---------------------------

Jeffery Fawcett
04/18/2000 10:38 AM
To:	rmoore01@elp.rr.com
cc:	Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Amerimex Bloomfield Project

Rick,
It was really great visiting with you the other day.  It never ceases to amaze me how small a world this is.  I hope this project moves forward and we get the opportunity to work together again.

Attached for your use is the schematic you spoke with Ron Matthews about.  It's not too terribly detailed, so I don't know if it will be useful or not.  We have much more detailed images of the Bloomfield area on our alignments, but without a legal description, we're a little blind.

I don't know if you've had a chance to get the legal description for the proposed plant site yet or not, but if you have it, would you forward that on to me?  We could then get started at not only putting together a rough cost estimate for the tap and meter, but we could begin looking for the best route for a lateral line between the facilities.

Look forward to hearing from you soon.


In order to ensure that our communications with the investment community are consistent, Stephen Moore of Moody's and I have agreed to publicly state the following as it pertains to the Moody's rating action taken today:

Full Review To Occur - The action is intended to be the catalyst for a full review of our business operations to occur in the coming months.  The company's appropriate rating will be determined during this time frame;

Primary Areas of Concern - Moody's will be focusing on the following items during the review:

Potential Future Equity Write downs:
Dhabol
California
Broadband Fiber Network
Wessex/Azurix

Slow Progress in Asset Sales - we have been discussing sales for the past 18 months with limited closings

Material Working Capital/Margin Expansion - has resulting in negative cash flow from operations

The Equity Adjustment - Moody's was unaware of the potential of an equity adjustment of this magnitude

Please let me know if you would like to discuss any of the points in detail.

Regards:
Tim DeSpain
x31770


Building maintenance somehow got a hold of Debra and she knows about the hole in the wall.
I told her I had no idea how it happened.   I just wanted you to know.
I basically told her I found the hole and I called on my own.  The maintenance people have her number on file
or something, so she was looking around for the original person that called.

Sorry.  Thought I could keep it a secret.  You can't keep anything from her it seems.

Jill


---------------------- Forwarded by Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron on 03/29/2000
01:14 PM ---------------------------

Missy Stevens
03/29/2000 12:58 PM
To: Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Problem Solving

Hi - I can't find that buzz word bingo thing, but I did find this...  :)

---------------------- Forwarded by Missy Stevens/Corp/Enron on 03/29/2000
12:57 PM ---------------------------

John Walt
09/01/99 03:55 PM
To: Missy Stevens/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Problem Solving

Is this the process you have put in place for budgeting?

 - problem-.jpg


Start Date: 4/15/01; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041510.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 10 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_LUCKY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 10 / Preferred: -50.00 / Final: -45.03)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: CRLP
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: SETC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 10 / Preferred:  10.00 / Final:   5.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Following are the reservations for the speech on Friday November 3:

Hotel:  Westin William Penn Hotel
 (412)281-7100

Conf.: Kristin - 401220
 Vince - 401221

Any questions, call me.

Alyse


Greg Whalley will be holding a budget meeting on Tuesday, Feb. 6 @ 3:00 p.m. in EB3321.  This invitation is extended to all CEOs and/or COOs reporting to Wholesale Services.  Should you have any questions, please contact me immediately.

Confirmed Attendees:
Louise Kitchen
Dave Delainey
Jeff McMahon
Jeff Shankman
Jim Hughes
Wes Colwell


David -

Thanks for your note.  Just to keep you posted - I plan to be there with my
boat but will return to my slip at Kemah Harbor and drive over to the party
so I won't add to the size of your raft.

Mark

David.Galloway@chron.com on 03/08/2000 11:37:51 AM
To: David.Galloway@chron.com
cc:
Subject: Saturday's plans

 Hi, folks.
 All of you have expressed an intent to bring your boats out to meet
New World on Saturday.  It's looking like we have about 32 boats coming out.
We're hoping to raft together as many as possible off the restaurant's dock.
I know some of you who have your own slips nearby will be taking your boats
home and driving over to the party.
 But we've had one skipper mention that he wouldn't be willing to
raft together with others out of fear for his thin, wooden hull.  We've
secured him a nearby slip, and we could come up with a few more if we must.
If for any reason you believe you cannot raft together with the other boats,
please let me know immediately, and I'll see what I can do.
 Also, if you haven't seen the plan (updated today), please visit
http://www.chron.com/content/interactive/voyager/sail/party/boats.html.
 Thanks.  And we'll see you on Saturday.
--
David Galloway
HoustonChronicle.com
David.Galloway@chron.com <mailto:David.Galloway@chron.com>
http://www.HoustonChronicle.com/david
http://www.HoustonChronicle.com/edge


Today FERC issued the following draft orders:

NYISO TEP and Bid Cap (ER01-3001):  Commission granted NYISO's request to extend the currently effective $1000/MWh Bid Caps on certain NYISO adminstered markets, and to extend its Temporary Extraordinary Procedures for Correcting Market Design Flaws and Addressing Transitional Abnormalities, until the Northeastern RTO is operational.  The Commission ordered NYISO to narrow the scope of the TEP, and to file tariff sheets doing so within 30 days.

NYISO proposed virtual bidding procedures (ER01-3009; ER01-3153):  Tariff changes to implement virtual bidding were approved.  The changes would allow market participants to bid non-physical generation and load into the day-ahead market and settle the bids in the real-time market.  Also accepted were NYISOs Market Mitigation Measures to address gaming or market power strategies that might emerge as a result of the virtual bidding.

NYISO - Cost responsibility for new interconnections.  (ER01-2967):  Tariff changes allocating cost responsibility for interconnection facilities.  The provisions allocate to developers 100% of the cost of facilities necessary to physically interconnect the project.  Additionally, developers are allocated the coswts for transmission system upgrades that would not have been made "but for" the interconnection, minus the cost of any facilities that the NYISO's regional plan dictates would have been necessary anyway for load growth and reliability purposes.

ISO-NE - Interim Bid Caps (ER01-3086):  Commission approved extension of bid caps until the Northeastern RTO is operational.

Calpine v. ISO-NE (EL01-124):  Commission granted complaint by Calpine and Mirant, finding that ISO-NE has amended Market Rule 5 to exclude external contracts from setting the energy clearing price, in violation of a Commission order.

If you need further information, please let me know.

Susan Lindberg
x30596


Dear Sara,

I am not sure of what the relevant considerations are for selecting a
governing law for an internal agreement but if EJ agrees to NY or Texas then
this should work, particularly given the identity and location of the
counterparty and the location of the head office of Enron Corp.

Hope this is helpful.

Jane McBride

Tel.:       81-3-5219-4500 (Main)
            81-3-5219-4553 (Direct)
Fax:        81-3-5219-4510

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	2001/02/17 08:45

		 To: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Representative Agreement between Enron Japan Corp. and Enron North
America Corp. (the "Services Agreement")

Jane:

Susan is trying to revise the Services Agreement once again and the
"governing law" issue was raised.  I do not have any memoranda addressing
which choice of law would be binding on Enron Japan Corp.  However, I note
that the draft ISDA marked by our Japanese counsel for use by Enron Japan
Corp. and IBJ elects New York law (AA email to me dated 9/21/00).  Are either
Texas or New York law preferable for the Services Agreement?

Thanks for your assistance.  Regards.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


All

A reminder that you are scheduled to interview for the Trading Track Thursday,  November 1st, from 2.00 pm onwards.   Resumes and schedules will be forwarded to you shortly.

Regards,

Karen Buckley


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/11/2001 07:56 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	01/11/2001 05:19 PM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Marcie
Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Extraordinary Session - Update

MEMORANDUM RE FIRST EXTRAORDINARY COMMITTEE SESSION

From:  Sandi McCubbin
            Mike Day

January 11, 2001

Note: This memo will supplement the committee analysis which you will
receive by separate fax.

ABX1-5 Keeley re the governance of the ISO and PX was discussed first.
A number of possible amendments were discussed by members.  Suggested
amendments included extending the term of members beyond one year,
increasing the number of members beyond 3, whether there should be
senate confirmation of ISO and PX board members, or at least voting
representation for the legislature on the Energy Oversight Board which
will approve the ISO/PX members.  There was also discussion of whether
FERC would approve of this new governance structure.   Another
discussion centered on whether the positions should be full time, as
opposed to part time, and how to define &affiliated8 in conjunction with
the bill,s ban on members of the ISO and PX being affiliated with a
market participant.

Support for the bill:  Consumers Union, EOB on behalf of the
administration, CalPIRG, PX, TURN, UCAN, ORA, Coalition of Utility
Employees.

Opposition:  ISO, which raised issues regarding incompatibility with
FERC orders and concern that the bill would lead to lengthy litigation.
They suggested that if the ISO and PX boards were appointed solely by
the California governor that FERC would not find that legally sufficient
to be &independent8.

ABX1-6 Dutra/Pescetti  addressed retained utility generation assets and
commission regulation of same.  The bill as written is merely a clean up
to clarify that the CPUC would retain jurisdiction over utility
generation after it is valued for purposes of calculating CTC*until and
unless the CPUC gives permission for the plant to be sold under Section
851.    The discussion evolved into a lengthy inquiry over the different
regulatory schemes for utility and non-utility generation.  Assemblyman
Leonard questioned whether it was efficient to have a market where a
portion of the generation was regulated and another portion
unregulated.  More and more members skirted the subject of attempting to
regulate the non-utility generators within the state.  In supporting
testimony, CPUC President Lynch essentially asked for jurisdiction over
such generators, stating that CPUC inspectors were denied access to an
AES plant at Redondo Beach for 9 hours during an ISO alert yesterday.
Chmn. Wright asked Lynch to assemble a list of the regulatory powers she
would seek.

In support:  CPUC, TURN, UCAN, CUE, PG&E, SCE

PG&E agreed with Lynch and also argued that the Legislature should
revisit the exemption regulation for marketers and non-utility
generators contained in Code section 216(I).   PG& also had suggested
technical amendments, which were not released, which dealt with
confirming that Section 367 still requires market valuation and that the
CPUC can set the ratemaking for such retained assets.

We have talked with the author about meeting with him after the
amendments are available.  No amendments were voted on for any of these
bills until they are brought up in the Senate.  Thus there was only
limited discussion of amendments.


I am on the Board of BEAR and sponsoring this effort.  Please let Janette
Elbertson know by e-mail if you are interested in donating your time to help
staff the table in the lobby on Monday, December 18, from 10 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.

Thank you.

Help CPS Kids!
Enron, KRBE and Sun and Ski Sports are collecting donations for Children,s
Protective Services Be A Resource (BEAR) Program to purchase gifts this
holiday season. Make your donation and receive a $10-off coupon for Sun and
Ski Sports.

Donations will be accepted in the Enron Building Lobby - Tuesday, December
12, Thursday, December 14 and Monday, December 18 from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. or
in EB407.

KRBE Morning Show LIVE in Antioch Park
Come out and show your support for the CPS BEAR collection Monday, December
18 when the 104 KRBE morning show,s Streets of America comes to Antioch Park.
See you there from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m.


Please remind me of this class.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2001 04:54
PM ---------------------------

Ernie
02/28/2001 07:04 AM
Sent by: Ernie
To: Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Development Center Class Reminder  - Harassment Avoidance

You are scheduled to attend:

Harassment Avoidance
Class Days and Times:
  3/5/2001  02:45:00 PM - 04:15:00 PM
Room # & Location: DoubleTree-La Salle B,  Houston
Participant Fee: $ 50
Note:

If you are unable to attend this class, the registration must be canceled by
5:00 p.m. on  March 5, 2001 to prevent a charge of $ 50 to your RC number.

 We look forward to seeing you at 02:45:00 PM on March 5, 2001.  Please call
the Development Center Team at 713-853-0357 if you have any questions.

 Thank you.


Thank you!  When would be a convenient time for me to give you a call?  I'd
be interested in your thoughts on the proposed changes.


can you tell me what kind of things he said

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 1:52 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

talk to wade.  i refuse to live how we are living.  i still can't believe some of the things that he said to me on saturday.  i just want to know where he stands i guess.  ofcourse, my mom thinks that i am a psycho now!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 1:49 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

friday morning, I cant wait, what do you mean figure out your life

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 1:48 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

nothing really.  just sitting here.  i guess trying to figure out my life??!!!  :)  how about you?  when are you leaving for skiing?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 1:45 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i know and its really depressing at first until you start to see results, im going to be really sore for skiing, anyway what do you have going on this week

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 1:43 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i am running mtm's for george.  BORING!!!  we just got back about 15 minutes ago.  you will get there.  it takes time and it is not fun!  :)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 1:42 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

my work out was ok, im so damn out of shape but im committed to go every day now, i want to lose 20 pounds by march 1, anyway, i went to barnabys with john sandra, and andy, what are you doing

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 1:22 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

i think that we just saw you driving.  did you leave for lunch?  how was your workout?


Tony Pryor recommended that I put back into the policy section II A &B so
that at our meeting tomorrow at 10:00 A.M. we can discuss them.  Please use
this copy of the draft dated 12/5/00 to discuss from tomorrow.

	From:  Dan Fancler                           12/01/2000 11:28 AM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jerry
Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Lee Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: ETS risk management policy revisions

I have included Drew's recommendations and have amended the 11/6/2000 drafts
of the ETS Risk Policy and Risk Procedure.  The significant change made was
to take out references to Hedging and Non-Hedging Transactions (II A. & B.
have been taken out).  We will just call them all Derivative Transactions.  I
would like Tony Pryor to arrange a meeting with all parties to move these
documents forward, an alternative is to continue to use the Corporate Risk
Management Policy and just set the trading limits as part of the Corporate
Policy.

Cassandra Schultz in RAC has not responded to the policy and I plan to
follow-up with her after we meet to discuss.

Dan


The New Year has arrived and we really to finalize a lot of the work with regards to moving into NETCO.  Obviously we still do not have a deal but the deadline is approaching and preparations need to be finalized.

The main areas to focus on over the next week are:-

(i) 	Re-start/Integration Plans (due on Jan 7)				To be forwarded to Louise
	These plans need to be detailed and show clear detailed timelines and detailed responsibilities for getting us up and running as soon as possible.
	The current restart date is January 21, 2001 but may be pushed forward to January 14, 2002.
(ii)	Budget (due Jan 3, 2002)						To be forwarded to Faith Killen
	First year budget to include all start up costs (some of which can be amortized)
(iii)	Seating Plans								Tammy Shepperd to co-ordinate
	We need to start the planning process for seating as we will be living on floors 5 & 6 of the Enron South building.
	I have asked Tammy Shepperd to commence the seating plan and we would look to start the moves as soon as possible but with a large number occuring around January 11,2002.
(iv)	Due Diligence
	We continue the process with two new companies this week (Wednesday and Thursday). Andy Zipper is taking the lead for the company arriving on Wednesday, please help him with his requirements.

I would ask that both John and I are notified of any changes to the Netco personnel list on a timely fashion and that the list is maintained on a continual basis.  Please forward all alterations to Jeanie Slone who has responsibility for the master list.

Communication - I believe that the New Year combined with a internal communication issues may be a good time to review what we want to say on Netco and what our policies are.  I am asking David Oxley to co-ordinate with all of you on this.  I know a lot of you believe that we need to only communicate once we have retention programme in place for the estate which may be a good idea but we we need to make sure that we lose as few people as possible.

If you are unavailable this week, please ensure you delegate this work out.

Happy New Year

Louise


Per your request, please see attached.


Susan:  This is an urgent matter for London.  We need to have this guaranty
executed quickly and I will call Clem to describe the issue.  Please handle
and follow up with me during the day.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 08:26 AM -----

	Denis O'Connell
	12/13/2000 07:13 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. ("MSCS")

Sara - I would be very grateful if you could have the attached executed and
faxed to Matt Flett at MS in London, with a copy to myself asap.

Many thanks for your assistance.

Best regards,

Denis

Denis O'Connell
Senior Counsel
Enron Europe Limited
Tel. +4402077834828
Fax. +4402077839238

From: Sara Shackleton on 12/12/2000 09:35 CST
To: Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. ("MSCS")

Matt and Denis:

I spoke with Matthew Flett about an hour ago and he advised that
EnronCredit.com Limited had finalized its ISDA.  I requested a copy burt he
has not yet sent it over.  Both ENE and ENA want to execute masters with MSCS
and we would like to work from your document.

Can you email me a copy?

Thanks.  Sara