Attached, please find ABX2 42 (Kelley) which is Assemblyman Dave
Kelley's direct access bill, formerly ABX1 21.  The new language was
drafted by the Direct Access Coalition.  Assemblyman Kelley is going to
have a stakeholder meeting tomorrow afternoon to discuss proposed
changes, particularly with respect to cogeneration.

http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/abx2_42_bill_20010521_introdu
ced.pdf


Do you have an answer to Carol's question.
Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT on
07/07/2000 02:57 PM ---------------------------
   Carol St Clair                07/07/2000 02:48 PM

To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: new format

David:
Thanks for sending this to me.  Since I will be hear through next Friday at
the latest, I would ask that once this chart has been completed that you
contact Mark Taylor to see who from our group will take this project over
while I am out.  Thanks.
Carol

	David P Dupre
	07/07/2000 02:27 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: new format

Hi,
Jeff asked me to forward the new report to you.

Here is the format of the new report and a brief description of each tab:

1. formerage-Willie's prior aging schedule. Do we want to see this for each
c/p? I think it would be helpful
2. aging-Current aging schedule by year
3. STC-Dcaf-Current physical STC information from Dcaf
4. STC-Tagg-Current physical STC information from tagg
5. financial-Current and new format. If you move the lower bar to the right
of the gray boxes, you will see the new columns
     which we've discussed.

I completed the master agreement column from the Lotus Notes database;

We are currently waiting on credit for the exposure information and their
assessment (e.g. 'credit concern', 'good credit', etc.);

Tagg is able to provide term information for each counterparty, but since it
is a time-intensive process, Ron Nolte is looking
into adding a button in tagg that will allow this and/or create a special
customized ongoing report;

I am in the process of completing the remaining two columns (i.e. do they
sign confirms?, if they don't, reasons why?)

Overall, I think that this new format, including my proposed aging schedule,
will be a valuable 'tool' for all involved in our
follow-up work.

Thanks
David

   Carol St Clair                07/06/2000 11:05 AM

To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Project

David:
Please keep in mind that we are not basing our decision on which
counterparties to contact solely based on exposure and credit concern
information, but rather based on all of the categories that Mark Taylor and I
have asked you to compile with respect to each counterparty so I don't want
the exposure numbers to be limited to any particular type of counterparty.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	David P Dupre
	07/06/2000 10:28 AM

		 To: Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Project

Hi,
I don't know how this was settled between Carol and Russell, and  I don't
understand why Russell would not
want to provide this exposure information to us.

As we discussed earlier last month, I think it would be good to select a
date, let's say July 5th in this case, and then go forward.

I like your idea of identifying whether the c/p is a 'credit concern' or a
'good credit', perhaps this could be listed in the 'status' column
on the following spreadsheet.

I have attached a list of updated counterparty names.

Thanks
David
---------------------- Forwarded by David P Dupre/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000 10:09
AM ---------------------------
To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Project

How did things get settled between Carol and Russell?   Looking over the
spreadsheet itself, I would be able to tell you right off which
counterparties we consider "Credit Concerns", where you would then prioritize
on your end.  Even though some counterparties may high high exposures, we
consider them to be "Good Credits" (for example Duke).  Once again, financial
exposures vary (sometimes very significantly) from one day to the next.
Therefore the totals you'll have for current exposures will not be validated
for more than a week, at the max.

Let me know how you want to go about this.  I think if I highlight which
counterparties we feel you should look into, this would go a lot faster.

Regards--VE


Here are the picks for this weekend:

 - 2000PlayoffScores11.xls


Hi Barbette -

Thank you for the information.  Do you have a list of the directors with home
addresses and spouse's names?  Mr. Lay wants us to add them to our database.

I appreciate it.

Rosalee

Barbette_Watts@i2.com on 10/02/2000 06:21:53 PM
To: bcash@srfunds.com, Bill_Beecher@i2.com, David_Becker@i2.com,
kenneth.lay@enron.com, Robert_Donohoo@i2.com, Romesh_Wadhwani@i2.com,
sandy_tungare@vistaar.com, Sanjiv_Sidhu@i2.com, tom_meredith@dell.com
cc: Barbette_Watts@i2.com, denean_probasco@vistaar.com,
heather_dalton@dell.com, jdavidson@srfunds.com, kelly_landgraf@dell.com,
Kim_Robinson@i2.com, Laurie_Harris@i2.com, rosalee.fleming@enron.com,
Sandi_Drysdale@i2.com, Sheryl_Campbell@i2.com, Diana_Collins@i2.com
Subject: i2 Board of Directors Meeting

Good Evening,

This is a reminder that the i2 Board Meeting will be on Monday, October 23,
2000.

     Location: One i2 Place
               Red Conference Room, 4th Floor

     Contact:  David Becker
               469-357-6266

     Time:          8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
               Continental Breakfast

Please confirm attendance by Wed, October 11, 2000.  Thank you.

Barbette Joy Watts
Executive Assistant to David Becker
One i2 Place, 3rd Floor
469-357-3460 (Direct)
469-357-6769 (Fax)
barbette_watts@i2.com


Dear Dr. Kaminski:

We are hoping to receive your review of "Long-Term Value at Risk" for the
JRI.  Please contact me if you have any questions.

Best regards,
Kumi Smedley
Assistant Editor, The Journal of Risk and Insurance


Hello,
 Research Weather Team

I will meet with Tiko today to discuss our move on Nov. 9th,

Please note : File space is very limited , we must be prepared.

We will also have our last tour before moving on Nov.6th and we
will actually see our new location.

I am also working with Reggie Wilson to see if maybe we
can have a shelf or any other type furniture built to allow
us storage space for files papers etc.....

Printers, copiers and other equipment is really not
a great concern at the moment because we are working
to be sure this will be operational.

All supplies are packed and ready for moving , we have a very limited
amount  in the supplies closet , if you need something and you
do not see it - please do not hesitate to ask.

                           Thanks
                         Kevin Moore


Hi Matt,

I apologize for not getting back to you sooner.  Here is the document I promised that describes some of the steps I went through to collect and verify data.  I will give you a call to discuss.


Well, I goofed up the email again.

The dates we are reducing noms for are 3/14 and 3/15.

I'll call on Wednesday AM about Thursday numbers.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Carson/Corp/Enron on 09/07/2000
02:59 PM ---------------------------

Mike Carson
09/07/2000 10:56 AM
To: Clint Dean/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:

7:00 Saturday,,,2633 cason in West U


The entity I trade with is TXU Gas Distribution.  I verified this with my contact this morning.  So, deal 1085609 is correct.

D
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Deming, Richard
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:42 PM
To:	Farmer, Daren J.
Subject:	FW: TXU Gas Distribution & Enbridge Consumers Gas

Can you make the change?

Thanks
Richard
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sonnonstine, Max
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:25 PM
To:	Deming, Richard; Wallumrod, Ellen
Subject:	TXU Gas Distribution & Enbridge Consumers Gas

Rich & Ellen:

We have some problems with the following two counterparties: TXU Gas Distribution & Enbridge Consumers Gas.  For TXU Gas Distribution, this is a unconsolidated division of TXU Gas Company and all deals booked under TXU Gas Distribution should be confirmed as TXU Gas Company.  I understand this is not the case.  For Enbridge Consumers Gas, this is not a valid entity.  At some point it will be a correct name, but for now deals should be confirmed and booked under Consumers Gas Co. Ltd.

Each has a relatively recent deal booked to it that need to be changed as described above: Sitara 1085609 for TXU and 1086002 for Enbridge Consumers Gas.

Please advise if there is something I need to do from my end to get this issue resolved.

Thanks,
Max Sonnonstine
x58261


Notice to Members No: 00-404
November 21, 2000

TO:  ALL NYMEX MEMBERS
  ALL NYMEX MEMBER FIRMS
  ALL NYMEX CLEARING MEMBERS

FROM:  Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT: DELIVERY ISSUES)PLATINUM and PALLADIUM FUTURES CONTRACTS

The Exchange has received approval from the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission to amend;

1) Platinum Futures Contract Rules: 90.02, "Contract Unit"; 90.03, "Grade and
Quality Specifications"; 90.08, "Delivery Procedure"; 90.10, "Depository
Receipt"; 90.11, "Inspection"; 90.14, "Rights and Obligations in a Delivery";
90.18, "Transition of 99.5 Contract to 99.9 Contract"; 90.18A, "Transition
Rules" and Supplement No.5, "Approved Brands Acceptable on the London
Platinum and Palladium Market" and

2) Palladium Futures Contract Rules: 100.02, "Contract Unit"; 100.03, "Grade
and Quality Specification"; 100.04, "Packaging and Marking"; 100.08 "Delivery
Procedure"; 100.10, "Depository Receipt"; 100.11, "Inspection"; 100.14,
"Rights and Obligations in a Delivery"; 100.17, "Transition of 99.8 Contract
to 99.9 Contract"; 100.17A, "Transition Rules" and Supplement No.5, "Approved
Brands Acceptable on the London Platinum and Palladium Market".

The approved amendments are effective commencing with deliveries in the
December 2000 Palladium Futures Contract and with deliveries in the January
2001 Platinum Futures Contract.

The approved amendments:

1) increase the weight tolerance on the platinum and palladium ingots/plate
delivered from five (5) percent to seven (7) percent;

2) expand the list of approved brands acceptable for delivery against the
respective Exchange contracts by adding all of the brands of platinum and
palladium acceptable on the London Platinum and Palladium Market ("LPPM") as
of September 18, 2000;

3) permit the delivery of approved brands of platinum and palladium to an
Exchange approved depository directly from the vaults of Credit Suisse First
Boston and UBS Warburg in Zurich, Switzerland, which are delivery locations
for the London Platinum and Palladium Market, by an Exchange approved carrier
without the requirement for an assay certificate;

4) eliminate the transition rules which were applicable when the contract,s
quality specifications were transitioned to the current 99.95% pure
specification; and

5) establish procedures and safeguards for the buyer in the event the metal
being delivered does not meet the quality specifications of the contract.

The approved rule amendments may be found on the Exchange,s website at
www.nymex.com/refernce/notices/ntm_404.htm

Should you have any questions or require any further information please
contact Albert J. Getz at 212-299-2608.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=00-404"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Lunch sounds great.  The question is when would be a good time.  Cindy is out
this week but I will have her figure out a date.


Attached is the memo referenced above.  The Underwriting Agreement containing
the subject of the supplement is scheduled to be signed by JEDI on Thursday
immediately following pricing of the shares being sold pursuant to the
secondary offering.

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, Suite 3817
Houston, Texas 77002
Tele. (713) 345-8347
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
e-mail:  angela.davis@enron.com


Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date:		Monday, June 11th
Time:		11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location:	50th Floor Boardroom
Video:		Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call:	AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera (713-853-5984)
		or Bill Dorsey (713-646-6505) for the weekly dail-in number and passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and through what medium.

	Yes, I will attend in person	----------

	By video conference from	----------

	By Conference call		----------

	No, I will not attend		----------

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday, June 8th.

Thank you,
Bill Dorsey.


We just changed the deal - it was input correctly, but the computer did not
change the time zones correctly. That's why we were off 25 MW. I'll let Duong
Luu know of the problem.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/17/2000 12:39 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: 458802

i was talking about the total mws, they have 23,775, we have 23,800.  i think
they entered the strips wrong.  can you pls check on that.

thanks

   Kate Symes @ ECT                11/17/2000 02:17 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 458802

Mike confirmed with Natsource this was a 25MW deal with no broker fee.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/17/2000 07:47 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 458802

the broker has 23,775 as total mws, and also has a fee of .0075.


Janet,
 Please review the attached amendment to see if it sets forth your
understanding of the pricing to be applicable with regard to the first
volumes to be delivered during the July - June time period.  I assume you
want the prices to revert to Index after this period.  Please advise, If
okay, please forward to Pat Anderson.

	Janet H Wallis
	04/03/2001 09:07 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: pat.anderson@southernunionco.com
		 Subject: Galveston / Port Art/Revision one

Opps, see revisied price.

Dan we need to admend the Galveston Port Art contract to reflect the
following
price changes ( from IF + adder to fixed price + adder) :

Date   Volume   Price

Jul 01 - Oct 01    525 a day  $5.20 plus adder
Nov 01     875 a day  $5.27 plus adder
Dec 01 - Feb 02  1,800 a day  $5.33 plus adder
Mar 02 - Jun 02    525 a day  $4.53 plus adder

---------------------- Forwarded by Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001
09:04 PM ---------------------------

Janet H Wallis
04/03/2001 08:50 AM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: pat.anderson@southernunionco.com
Subject: Galveston / Port Art.

Dan we need to admend the Galveston Port Art contract to reflect the
following
price changes ( from IF + adder to fixed price + adder) :

Date   Volume   Price

Jul 01 - Oct 01    525 a day  $5.20 plus adder
Nov 01     875 a day  $5.27 plus adder
Dec 01 - Feb 02  1,800 a day  $5.33 plus adder
Mar 02 - Jun 02    525 a day  $5.53 plus adder

Thanks,

Janet


"I haven't failed. I've found 10,000 ways that don't work." - Albert
Einstein; NASDAQ slides again - down 91 - DOW up 28; H&Q downgrades EBAY
(Ebay Inc) (down 4 5/16) from strong buy to buy; AMZN (Amazon) (down 8 1/8)
falls on cautionary comments from Lehman; ACCL (Accelerated Networks) (up 32
7/8) IPO priced at $15; TWX (Time Warner) (down 4 1/16) shareholders approve
AOL (America Online) (down 4 1/8) purchase; CMGI (CMGI Inc) (down 3 1/2) on
earnings warning - CS First Boston cuts to hold from buy; CAG (Conagra Inc)
(down 1 3/8) buying IHF (International Home Foods) (up 5 1/4); Rumor - NOK
(Nokia Corp) (down 3 5/16) to buy QCOM (Qualcomm) (down 1 7/8); RMBS
(Rambus) (up 17 9/16) on Hitachi settlement; KOOP (DrKoop.com) (up 29/32)
receives $1.5 Million; HGSI (Human Genome) up 10 1/16; SUNW (Sun
Microsystems) down 5 7/16; VSAT (Viasat) down 5 1/4; MSFT (Microsoft) down 2
1/8; BRCM (Broadcom) down 3; AMAT (Applied Materials) down 3 1/6; BMCS (BMC
Software) down 2 1/16;

 MO buys Nabisco

 AOL, TWX deal - regulators taking closer look.

 AMZN* - hit hard (down 19% on analyst comments) - company says
report was wreckless.

 SNE - Palm device debuts on Tues.

 Liberty Media - biggest shareholder in European Cable and TV giant -
United GlobalCom.

 NY Times - delays tracking stock.

 USA Networks - interactive business in one division - to go public.

 Citrix - Chairman quits - management re-org - stock hit 18%.

 Recording industry - younger people buying less music as older
people buy more.

 Freeserve and Deut T - deal off.

 YHOO - put your company intranet with us.

 Dreamworks - record label takes online submissions.

 INTC - new Celeron chips (AMD's made their new chip announcement
last week)/ also INTC opening software development center in Russia.

 Mattel - nixing software that stirred privacy concerns in their
interactive games.

 TXN - buys Alantro - wireless local area networking co.

 Oxygen Media - closintg two shopping sites.

 More Chinese Net co.s coming to Nasdaq - Netease.com and Sohu.com.

 Vivity - video over corporate network - gets $4.5 million - HLIT is
investor.

 QXL - real challege to Ebay* in Europe.

 Overview of "Digital Livingroom" in WSJ - new devices are confusing
- interactive TV and Videa coming as is home networking. (PROX mentioned in
home networking article).

 Broadcom - positive article in NY Times.

 Electronics Retailer 800.com - pulls IPO.

 EXP.com - matches consumers and executives with experts,
counselors..... gets $33 million 2nd round including backing from Ask
Jeeves.

 EK - online photo printing.

 BRCD* - mentioned positively on CNBC.

 Latest round of dot com layoffs - Urban Box Office's Indie Planet
and Pseudo.

 CMRC buys APNT.

 Tangible Asset Galleries (art and rare coins) buys Gavelnet.com
(Collectables from network of Galleries).

 NY Times Page 1 Sunday - Online retailers stop offering endless
bargains - watching bottom line (Dan Ries has been saying this for weeks).

 Frank Quattrone - super-star tech banker at First Boston - part of
new deal is in house high tech fund - will do VC work.

 Barron's Cover Story - Roundtable group half-way through the year
overview - positive on wide variety of companies - Abby is still bullish
also likes Merck, C and Wells Fargo/ Some think CSCO, Nokia and Nortel are
overvalued/ other picks - Chris Craft, Modine Manufact., MONY Group,
Flextronics, Polaris Industries, Exxon, Royal Dutch, Apache, Anadarko,
Burlington Resources, Novartis, Roche, AXA, UPM Kyrmmene, Nomura, McLeod
USA, ABGenix, Gemstar-TV Guide, Furniture Brands (mentioned by 2 seperate
people), Georgia Pacific, Eserline, ITT Industries, Metlife, Edwards Life
Sciences, BTU International, Ross Stores, Comcast, Kellwood, AK Steel, D R
Horton, Navistar, Parkervision, Impath...

 WSJ Heard - was T's Wireless deal an IPO - question not academic -
was pre-deal trading okay?

 KOOP - $1.5 million loan from merchant bank.

 There is talk: CSCO for RBAK?/

 C.E. Unterberg Towbin: Futurelink Roadshow in San Fran./ Paul
Rodriguez marketing in Mid-Atlantic.

 Kimberly Breslauer - great job writing this letter last week.

The information contained herein is obtained from sources we believe to be
reliable but its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based
thereon, are not guaranteed. C.E. Unterberg Towbin, or one or more of its
partners, may have a position in any of the securities discussed herein. All
rights reserved by C.E. Unterberg Towbin. May not be reproduced in whole or
in part without prior written authorization. This report is not an offer to
sell or solicitation of an offer to buy the securities mentioned herein.
*C.E. Unterberg Towbin makes a market in this security and/or has analyst
coverage.
+C.E. Unterberg Towbin makes a market in this security and has been involved
in a recent financing.
_____________________________
Bram Towbin
C.E. Unterberg Towbin
10 East 50th Street
New York NY 10022

Telephone: 212 572 8163
Fax: 212 759 4032
Btowbin@unterberg.com
www.unterberg.com

----------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to SEC and NASD requirements, all incoming and outgoing e-mail of
C.E. Unterberg, Towbin is subject to review by the Compliance Department.

Please note that C.E. Unterberg, Towbin does not allow the use of e-mail to
request, authorize or  effect the purchase or sale of any security, to send
fund transfer instructions, or to effect any other transactions.  Any such
request, orders or instructions that you send will not be accepted and will
not be processed.

================================================================


Pick up the phone!!!!!


Outlook Migration Team@ENRON
05/04/2001 03:26 PM
To: Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anita
DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bob Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Chonawee
Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Elena Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gwyn
Koepke/NA/Enron@Enron, Jaesoo Lew/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kate Lucas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Parkhill/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance
Cunningham/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leann Walton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Martin
Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Raymond/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Nelson Neale/NA/Enron@Enron, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rabi De/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rakesh
Bharati/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sevil Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sofya
Tamarchenko/NA/Enron@Enron, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Barkley/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Youyi Feng/NA/Enron@Enron, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Muntz/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Anita Swanson/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Bambi
Heckerman/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Christopher Burns/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Darla
Steffes/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Geneva Patterson/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Jerry
Boston/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Jody Warner/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, John
Freeman/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Judith Weakly/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Laurie
Willemyns/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Leon Schneider/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Loren
Charbonneau/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Ray Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Coburn/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Alliece Morris/OTS/Enron@ENRON, ETSWEB@Enron, Joe
Zhou/FGT/Enron@Enron, LaDonna Dervin/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Hill/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Max Brown/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Patty
Hermanek/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Peter Lu/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Randy
Cantrell/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Richard Abramowicz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Craig/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Robert Fugel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tina
Dunnaway/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Wendy Koh/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Anne
Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Carli
Smith/NA/Enron@Enron, Doug Fletcher/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jacquelyn Matthews/NA/Enron@Enron, Janelle
Russell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, JoAnne Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Kayla Bruzzese/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael J Beyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael J
Miller/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Michelle
Lincoln/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Huston/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Zachary Sampson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alison
Smith/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Bernie Penner/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Janet
Vala-Terry/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Lilia Penagos/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Patricia
Benington/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Jack Netek/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
cc:
Subject: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL 5-7-01

Current Notes User:

To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook,
it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of
migration.  Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following
survey.  When you finish, simply click on the 'Reply' button then hit 'Send'
Your survey will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.

Thank you.

Outlook 2000 Migration Team

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------

Full Name:       Vince J Kaminski

Login ID:  vkamins

Extension:  3-3848

Office Location:  EB1962

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop,  Laptop,  Both)  Desktop, Laptop

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot,
Jornada)  Palm Pilot

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?  NO
    If yes, who?

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?  Shirley Crenshaw,
Anita DuPont
    If yes, who?

Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?  NO
    If yes, who?

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?  NO
    If yes, who?

Do you have access to a shared calendar?  NO
    If yes, which shared calendar?

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for
mass mailings)?  NO
    If yes, please list here:

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will
need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From: 7:30     To:      6:30

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc? NO
       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):


You mean Bob Lane?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shapiro, Richard
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	Bob Long

Do you have Bob's phone number?


Rae,

I am not sure if Jeff Hodge has already volunteered me.  If he has not, I
would like to volunteer to be on the drafting committee.  I am not available
May 29th through June 1st.  Otherwise, I can make myself available whenever
the drafting committee meets.

Thank you,

Stacy Dickson


These are all the ones I am aware of.

	showard@agsk.com
	05/31/2001 07:19 PM

		 To: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: ECT Securities Depositions--agreements witn Kathy

Richard,

Please review the attached fax from Ben Ogletree, one of Natwest's lawyers,
especially the four attached agreements (which Natwest already has.)  Can I
represent to Natwest that these four agreements, along with the Oaktree
settlement agreement, constitute all settlement or cooperation agreements that
we have with any parties to any of NSM litigation?  If I can say that, the
issue of ECT Securities' deposition goes away.

Steve

     ................................................

ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
www.agsk.com

2049 Century Park East
Thirty-Ninth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3213
Tel 310-277-1226
Fax 310-552-6077

This transmission is intended only for the use
of the addressee and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately
via e-mail at postmaster@agsk.com or
by telephone at 310-277-1226. Thank you.

...............................................
 - Enclosed.txt
 - ~gw110B.tif


---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 07/20/2000
07:30 AM ---------------------------

"Kanner, Marty" <mkanner@kannerandassoc.com> on 07/19/2000 07:09:20 PM
To: "Jane Dunn Cirrincione (E-mail)" <jcirrincione@APPAnet.org>, "Deborah
Sliz (E-mail)" <dsliz@morganmeguire.com>, "Mark Yacker (E-mail)"
<myacker@elcon.org>, "Cynthia Sandherr (E-mail)"
<cynthia.sandherr@enron.com>, "Cynthia Bogorad (E-mail)"
<BogoradC@spiegelmcd.com>, "Gene Peters (E-mail)" <gpeters@epsa.org>
cc:

Subject: FW: RTO/market power discussion document

I sent the following to Andy Black in order to ensure that we also discuss
the RTO/market power issues.  I'll bring copies to the meeting.  Please feel
free to take issue with the language.

Marty Kanner
Kanner and Associates
122 C Street, NW
Suite 500
202-347-6625 - phone
202-347-6605 - fax
www.kannerandassoc.com <http://www.kannerandassoc.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Kanner, Marty
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 7:07 PM
To: Andy Black (E-mail)
Cc: Catherine Van Way (E-mail); Curry Hagerty (E-mail); Joe Kelliher
(E-mail); Bob Bolster (E-mail); Ramsen Betfarhad (E-mail); Rick Kessler
(E-mail); Sue Sheridan (E-mail)
Subject: RTO/market power discussion document

Andy -

Thanks again for allowing me to participate in this afternoon's discussion.
As I mentioned, I believe discussions of transmission issues must include
both jurisdictional and RTO.  I understand that the RTO discussion is more
difficult in the absence of paper.  For that reason, I have taken the
liberty of drafting language that I believe mirrors (at least my view) of
one possible construct of RTO Proposal I.

I hope you find this helpful.  I will bring copies to our meeting tomorrow.

 <<rto mp amend for barton discussion.doc>>

Marty Kanner
Kanner and Associates
122 C Street, NW
Suite 500
202-347-6625 - phone
202-347-6605 - fax
www.kannerandassoc.com <http://www.kannerandassoc.com>

 - rto mp amend for barton discussion.doc


John:

We still do not have a deal with the government.  They have delayed giving us a written proposal over the last two weeks.  The latest is that they have said that they will give us something on Tuesday of next week.

With respect to the burn rate, we are projecting about $20 million in expenditures over the next month.  Our current investment is about $220 million.

I think you should also have a rough idea of how we are funding this and what the plan is over the next couple of months.  The investment is currently funded through an off-balance sheet / on-credit vehicle with WestLB.  The WestLB vehicle is structured to fund the plant through commercial operations.  The plan is to have the OPIC financing in place to take out the WestLB vehicle.  This would infer an approximate $95 million equity investment upon the take-out of the WestLB vehicle.  We are currently in the process of syndicating the equity.  We have one indicative proposal for 50% of the equity.  We hope to have another next week.

There are some specific timing issues that you need to be aware of.  WestLB did not want to take operating risk in the financing.  Our position with WestLB is that we do not reach  commercial operations until we reach the start date of the Petrobras contract.  We are currently producing energy into the grid.  At some point, WestLB could try to force us to take out the entire vehicle prior to the OPIC funding.  Depending upon the timing, this could represent a cash flow of up to $280 million for a short period of time.

Please let me know what other questions you have.

Brett

From:	John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/26/2001 02:10 PM CDT
To:	Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject:

did we sell the power to the government?

What is our cash burn on the project right now and over the next month?


Please find attached the transcript of Stephen Cooper's latest voice mail.

ENA
x7404
x8321


The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 10:00, 17:00, and 23:00 in the
January 30, 2002 Real-Time Market.

Prices in the January 31, 2002 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

Please note that Market Monitoring will no longer be reserving prices due
to ECA-B.  Code modifications were made on December 20th to incorporate
into the Real-Time price, the BME price in the presence of congestion.  The
incorporation is now an automatic process that is prescribed by the NYISO
tariffs.  This message will appear in price reservation announcements
through January 31, 2002.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm

---
You are currently subscribed to nyiso_tie as: benjamin.rogers@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nyiso_tie-628650Q@lyris.nyiso.com


I'm interested in the Carrabean not just Jamaica but the primary focus is an
upscale place that caters to young children.


---------------------- Forwarded by Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT on 06/15/2000 02:35
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary A Hanks                           12/09/99 04:37 PM

To: Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: McMullen Outage

Shawna -  In addition to the meters sent to you in the earlier memo on the
McMullen system, the following meters were shut in at approximately 12:00 PM
on Thursday, December 9, 1999.  These meters were shut in order to install
pigging facilities to remove liquids from the McMullen 12".  These producers
should be brought back on-line sometime in the afternoon of December 10. 1999.

986847  Dolan Gas Unit #1
989604  Baker Central Point (Pioneer)
989638  Freeman Production - Maxine Field
989698  Mclean Bowers Central Point (Cordell)
989700  Tesoro Hoskins Central Point
989737  Pickett Texan Central Point
985853  Riser C/P Arco
986181  Houdman #1 (Cokinos)
986359  Sanger Heirs#351-1 CDP
986581  Sanger Heirs CDP
986682  Lynes J.R. Et Al #1
986845  Swierc #1

Once pigging facilities are in place, the McMullen 12" will be pigged
(sometime early next week, week of Dec. 13) and all of the producers in the
following attachment will be brought back on line.

If you have any questions, please call me at 36449.

Thanks
Gary


Chris,
This morning I sent  you a fax regarding Power Gas Marketing's May East Ohio
contract volume.  As per the fax, this gas did not get nominated, thus Power
Gas Marketing was "cashed out" by EOG.  Power Gas will be sending ENA an
invoice for $3,443.15 for the difference between the contract price and the
"cash out" price plus pooling fees.

Wade,
You may want go get a copy of the fax and the backup I faxed to Chris, or I
can fax a copy to you.
Has the May PMGT East Ohio invoice been paid?

John


Grant,
 I have reviewed your requested changes and have made the changes which do
not require explanation or clarification.  Those changes are reflected in the
above document.  Let me go over your list of items:
 1. I have deleted the word "DRAFT".
 2. I have left a blank for the date within the month of March 2001 when the
contract would be executed by the City.
 3. I have changed the word "may" to "shall".
 4. Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity does not fit in a Deficiency
Default, it is just the maximum quantity that can be handled by a party at a
particular point.  I do not think their is an omission.
 5. I have added the word "reasonable".
 6. The procedue for how the Termination Payment is determined is provided,
if the City disagrees with the method and values provided in the statement
and is unable to convince the Company to revise, the statement, then the
issue is to be resolved in arbitration.  At the point that a Termination
Payment calculation is necessary, a long drawn out period should not be
necessary to attain closure.
 7. We need to limit the duration to 30 days,  neither party should be
required to wait 60 days before it could accelerate the other party's
obligations under the Contract.  We might be able to add language to extend
the period if we had some documentation stating the steps that a party was
pursuing to cause the proceeding to be dismissed and the other party was
otherwise kept whole from a credit exposure.
 8. I have kept the 30 days because 5 days is too short a period.  During a
holiday period, one scheduling error could cover the entire period.  Article
3 has language which provides a remedy for a party if a scheduling default
extends for more than 5 days during any month.
 9. The reason is because Enron Corp. is the rated entity and no separate
rating applies to ENA.
 10. I have changed "a" to "the"
 11. I have eliminated the  60 day limitation on the duration of an event of
Force Majeure.
 12. This merely addressed the possibility of a imbalance amount being due
when a pipeline aggregates imbalances using multiple points, and the language
would allocated the payment based on the amount of the imbalance that a
particular party may have caused.  I think the language is clear as written.
 13. The definition of Act was one of the items that I had requested that you
review and complete as necessary so that all appropriate statutes were
referenced.  I am still waiting for your language.  I started filling it in
using language that had been provided by the City.
 14. I added the word "reasonable".
 15. I have made the requested change relating to GAAAP.
 16. This is a late payment provision and as such a believe that the
provision should be more than a party's rating, as such I have kept the 2%
over prime language.
 17. These amounts were determined by the credit group and any change needs
to be discussed with that group.  BBB-  is considered investment grade and I
understand that Enron Corp.'s rating is BBB.  ENA is not a rated entity and
that is why the language relates to Enron Corp.'s rating.
 18. The elimination of the opinion of counsel did not change the
requirements relating to the representations that we expect the City to have
made.  If the City cannot make these representations, then we need to know
that before we execute the Contract.
 19. I have added the word "reasonable".
 20. The party that has the Transport Agreement with the Transporter should
have the legal right to obtain the information based on its contract.
 21. It is our position that any dispute be arbitrated.  We can agree to
meditation if we can make the outcome binding on the parties.  I am willing
to discuss any changed language that you might care to offer.
 22. We have found that personnel of both our Company and that of our
Customers change so rapidily that the list is not workable and merely allows
a party to back out of transactions it does not like on the basis that the
person who agreed to such transaction was not on the list.  Therefore , we
object to any listing of approved parties who can transact.  We believe that
each party should be responsible for the actions of its employees and should
stand behind any transactions that those parties may enter into pursuant to
the terms and provisions of the Contract.

 I will be out of the office on Friday, but will be in all next week if you
care to discuss any of these matters.

	"Kolling, Grant" <grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us>
	03/02/2001 03:43 PM

		 To: "'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'" <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>, "Kolling, Grant"
<grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us>
		 cc: Kim.Ward@enron.com
		 Subject: RE: Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement

 <<0071988 RESO Enron.doc>>

Dan:

First, I've attached the proposed resolution which authorizes the City
Manager to execute the Enfolio agreement.

More importantly, I need to inform you that our senior management has
reviewed the referenced contract; I have been asked to present additional
changes to the agreement for Enron's consideration and to raise questions
about certain of its terms and conditions.

Let me start from page 1, top to bottom, and proceed to the end of the
exhibits.

1.  There is the word "DRAFT" above the title of the Enfolio agreement which
should be deleted.

2.  The introductory paragraph, line 5, should not contain the words "1st of
January, 2001."  It should be left blank, until the parties have signed the
contract.  Otherwise, the City will be in breach as of the date it signs the
contract, because Article 2, section 2.1 requires the City to proffer the
to-be-approved-by-Council resolution as of 1/1/01.

3.  Article 2, Section 2.4, line 2.  The City (Customer) wants Enron
(Company) to confirm every recorded telephonic Transaction, as defined.
Therefore, the City requests the word "may" should be changed to "shall."

4.  Article 3, Sections 3.1 and 3.2, first sentence:   Buyer's Requested
Quantity refers to the DCQ or MaxDQ.  Seller's failure to Schedule the
Buyer's Requested Quantity shall constitute a Seller's Deficiency Default.
How does a Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity fit into a Seller's
Deficiency Default if the Buyer's Requested Quantity does not include a
Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity?  What is the reason for the omission?

5.  Article 4, Section 4.1, lines 15 and 23:  Line 23 refers to "reasonable
attorneys' fees" yet line 15 refers to "attorneys' fees."  To be internally
consistent, line 15 should say "reasonable attorneys' fees."

6.  Section 4.1, right hand column, lines 3-4.  A statement showing the
determination of the Termination Payment will be prepared.  It's unclear
whether the City is entitled to review and challenge the determination
before a dispute is referred to arbitration.  The City should be entitled to
receive a copy of the determination and to question it before it is
obligated to pay the Termination Payment.  Please clarify, or permit the
City to exercise these rights.

7.  Section 4.2(iv) specifies that a Triggering Event will exist if a
bankruptcy petition is undismissed within 30 days.  Is this (under
bankruptcy laws) the minimum period of time within which one may seek
dismissal of a bankruptcy petition?  Please refer to the 11 USC section that
backs up this provision, or change to 60 days.

8.  Section 4.2(v) and (vi):  Please change "30 days" to "5 days."  The City
is concerned with the number of days that Enron may be permitted to fail to
Schedule before a Triggering Event is triggered by Enron.

9.  Section 4.2(ix):  this language discusses a default by Enron Corp.
(ENA's parent?), but no mention is made of ENA's default in this regard?
Please explain.

10. Section 4.5, line 4:  Is "a Company" supposed to refer to "the Company"
?

11. Article 5.  The City is uncomfortable with the force majeure provision
as drafted.  It states that the parties must perform even if a FM event
(earthquake) would prevent either or both parties from performing with the
60-day period stated therein.  There is no such limitation under California
law in the absence of a contract provision to the contrary.

12.  Article 7, Section 7.2:  Could Enron translate the last sentence?  We
don't understand it.

13.  Appendix "1":  Act:  Please explain why Section 3 is referred to?

14.  Appendix "1", Claims, line 4:  Please add "reasonable" before
"attorneys' fees.

 15.  Appendix "1", GAAP:  This should read: "GAAP means generally accepted
accounting principles, consistently applied, with respect to Company, and
governmental generally accepted accounting principles, consistently applied,
with respect to Customer."

16.  Appendix "1", Interest Rate:  Please delete "two percent over".  The
City has a AAA bond rating, therefore, the  City believes the 2% over prime
should not apply to it.

17.  Appendix "1", Material Adverse Change:  What does Enron believe the
City's Net Worth to be?  The $400 million threshold is mentioned.  Also,
what is ENA's bond rating?  Is "BBB-" an investment grade rating?

18.  Representations and Warranties:  Because we have agreed that the
opinion of counsel will not be required, the reps and warranties are being
deleted.  But the "Representations and Warranties" is nevertheless included
in the agreement.  Item (i) should be deleted, because the City has not
undertaken a court search as is our custom and practice whenever we issue an
opinion.  We would like to delete "and (vii) it is not ... Party."

19.  Operational Flow Orders, line 8:  Please add "reasonable" before
"attorneys' fees."

20.  Financial Matters, line 8:  What is meant by "to the extent it has a
legal right of access thereto and/or ...etc."

21.  Arbitration, Disputes to be Arbitrated.  We do not as a matter of legal
policy agree to arbitration, but we will mediate disputes.  Is Enron
amenable to mediation?  This process is less formal and less costly in my
opinion.

22.  Authority for Transactions.  Staff would like the Agreement to include
a list of employees for Company and Customer who are authorized to trade on
behalf of their employers.  Could a statement be added to this section to
this effect?  Then, we could attach the list(s) as an Exhibit C.

Thank you so much for considering these issues.  There are others which I
hope to receive from staff next week and which I will forward to you for
response.

Look forward to hearing from you soon.  I will be out of town after today
until Wednesday, March 7.

Sincerely,

Grant Kolling
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:16 AM
  To: grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us
  Cc: Kim.Ward@enron.com
  Subject: Re:  Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale
Agreement

   << File: 2001-002ctr.doc >>
  (See attached file: 2001-002ctr.doc)

  Grant,
       I have incorporated the language you provided to me in
the attached
  document.  I have been informed by the Corporate Secretary's
office that
  they will issue a Certificate of Incumbency showing that the
person
  executing the contract for ENA is authorized to execute
contracts for ENA.
  No other party signs as to form or terms, however, the
officer executing
  for ENA will require that the deal person and I initial on
the line next to
  his signature.  I have reviewed the proposed draft
resolution.  ENA will
  accept the enacted resolution and will not require that the
City Attorney
  issue an opinion.  If the attached contract is acceptable,
please print off
  2 originals, have them approved, signed and forward to me
for ENA's
  approval and signature.  Once the contract is fully
executed, I will return
  one fully executed original to you for the City's file.

 - 0071988 RESO Enron.doc


what is the current head count on this trip?


Chad Stamm
272 Bleecker St. 34
New York , NY 10014
cstamm@sekani.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Chad Stamm


Yes, Dave's reporting relationship and cost center has not changed; his is just physically moving down here since we have the space.

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vuittonet, Laura
Sent:	Tuesday, May 01, 2001 5:01 PM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.
Subject:	Dave Baumbach

Just wanted to let you know that Dave is scheduled to move over here on Friday.  Also, I just wanted to be sure that you told me that Dave will keep his current cost center?

Laura


thanks

we will likely need to simple corporate help as well to work on
assignments/termination - if possible maybe you could get somebody to assist
to also be on call.c


No charges.  I think we should refer these to Carrie Robert and ask her to
run down the people in the organization most likely to have an interest.  In
this case, I would get in touch with Andy Fastow, Ben Glissan or someone in
the finance group in London.  That way, we can make a better determination
about the value of the relationship, make sure those who are interested in
pitching them on doing bus. with Enron can be involved. Or, we can make a
determination to decline.  I think we decide who we want to let in then do it
for free, rather than charging.

MARY CLARK @
ENRON
04/17/2001 08:58 AM

To: Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron@EES, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON@EES

Subject: Re: RESPONSE NEEDED

I'm not in favor of charging a fee; that takes the goodwill out of it.   I'm
open to discussion on how often we host these meetings, however.

Elizabeth Tilney@EES
04/17/2001 08:29 AM
To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RESPONSE NEEDED

I believe that Cindy and I can keep doing these and there is certainly a
"goodwill" element here...and maybe that is the way to handle it. OR we might
want to think about "formalizing" this, say once a quarter and sending out
"invitations" and, maybe, charging for this????I think there are pros and
cons on all sides of the charging issue.....maybe we should get together and
discuss? Beth
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES on 04/17/2001
08:24 AM ---------------------------
MARY CLARK @
ENRON
04/17/2001 08:23 AM

To: Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: RESPONSE NEEDED

Beth, we're a hot commodity.  See a new request below to meet with us about
innovation, culture, retaining talent.  My team will coordinate this visit if
you agree we should participate in this meeting.

Mary
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Clark/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001 08:21
AM ---------------------------

Karen Denne
04/17/2001 07:56 AM
To: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vance Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RESPONSE NEEDED

Mary -- how do we route these requests?  It seems like Beth and Cindy have
been the point person for these visits, but I'm not sure how they'll react if
we send the requests to them.  Any ideas?  thx. kd
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001
07:51 AM ---------------------------
From: Cindy Derecskey on 04/17/2001 05:18 AM
To: Vance Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RESPONSE NEEDED

----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001 05:17 AM -----

	Elizabeth_Overton@haygroup.com
	04/17/2001 05:08 AM

		 To: public-relations@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fortune Study Awards

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am trying to find a contact within your organisation who could help me set
up
a meeting between a member of your Company and members of an Irish Bank who
are
extremely interested in sending a senior level delegation on a study visit to
recognised leaders in certain fields, in particular the Innovativeness and
Getting / Keeping Talent areas of the fortune survey.

We recognise that you have won awards in these areas of the fortune survey and
would like to contact someone in this field.

I look forward to receiving your reply.

Many thanks
Elizabeth

Book now for the 2001 Hay annual conference in Florence,
http://www.icm.haygroup.com

**** This e-mail and any attachments hereto are strictly confidential and
intended solely for the addressee.  It may contain information which is
privileged.  If you are not the intended addressee, you must not disclose,
forward, copy or take any action in reliance of this e-mail or attachments.
If
you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us as soon
as possible.

The anti-virus software used by Hay is updated regularly in an effort to
minimise the possibility of viruses infecting our systems. However, you should
be aware that there is no absolute guarantee that any files attached to this
e-mail are virus free.

Hay Management Consultants, 52 Grosvenor Gardens, London SW1W 0AU, Tel (44)
(0)20 7881 7000, Fax (44) (0)20 7881 7100, http://www.haygroup.com,
http://www.haypaynet.com, http://www.haygroup.co.uk

Registered in England and Wales No. 763575

Registered office address as above  ****


Things are always crazy around you, even when the rest of the world is
sitting still.

"Junek, Daniel" <DJunek@aeglobalmarkets.com> on 05/14/2001 03:52:21 PM
To: "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE:

not a one.  i don't even have a phone yet.  We moved into a new office today
(my first day) so things are a little crazy around here.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 4:50 PM
To: DJunek@aeglobalmarkets.com
Subject: Re:

How many deals have you done????

"Junek, Daniel" <DJunek@aeglobalmarkets.com> on 05/14/2001 01:08:49 PM

To:   "'chris.germany@enron.com'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Chris
     This in my new email address


Ed,

I am sure I shall screw up sooner or later (given my aging brain and
amount of work). This  guy will have to change his name
to Ed Krapels to stay employed.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Edward+20Krapels+22+20+3Cekrapels+40esaibos+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 26, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Neptune -- merchant transmission

Vince,

I think this other guy used to be named John Smith but changed his name to
Vince Kaminski to get a job in the power sector!

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Kaminski, Vince J [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 12:38 PM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Cc: vkaminski@aol.com
Subject: RE: Neptune -- merchant transmission

Ed,

I am still here.
Kaminski is a very popular Polish name.

My next stage in life, when it happens , is a small cottage
close to a beach, not another corporate job.

Vince

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Edward+20Krapels+22+20+3Cekrapels+40esaibos+2Eco
> m+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Friday, June 22, 2001 3:08 PM
> To:	Kaminski, Vince J
> Subject:	RE: Neptune -- merchant transmission
>
> Vince,
>
> Are you still there? I've noticed a Vincent F Kaminski who is manager
> of
> planning at Alleghany...
>
> Ed
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kaminski, Vince J [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@ENRON.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 12:31 PM
> To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
> Subject: RE: Neptune -- merchant transmission
>
>
> Hello Ed,
>
> It sounds very interesting. I forwarded your messages
> to two members of my group who work on the problems related
> to transmission (a key to the power markets successful
> growth).
>
> I shall share with you their  reaction.
>
> I hope everything is going well.
>
> Vince
>
>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From: 	"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com>@ENRON
> >
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Edward+20Krapels+22+20+3Cekrapels+40esaibos+2Eco
> > m+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> > Sent:	Friday, June 01, 2001 5:12 AM
> > To:	Vincent Kaminski \(E-mail\)
> > Subject:	Neptune -- merchant transmission
> >
> > Dear Vince,
> >
> > Greetings from Boston... In the last year, I've been associated with
> > the
> > Neptune merchant transmission project... check it out at
> > www.NeptuneRTS.com.
> > We filed with FERC last week and I'm sending you the Wall Street
> > Journal and
> > Megawatt Daily articles on it.
> >
> > Have you seen any good analytical work on merchant transmission? I'm
> > in a
> > dialogue with Paul Joskow and others on this issue but as always
> would
> > appreciate your thoughts.
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> > Ed
> >
> >
> >
> > Edward N. Krapels, PhD
> > Director
> > ESAI Power and Gas Services
> > tel 781 245 2036
> > cell 617 899 4948
> > ekrapels@esaibos.com
> > www.esai.com
> >
> >
> >  - winmail.dat << File: winmail.dat >>
>
>  - winmail.dat << File: winmail.dat >>

 - winmail.dat << File: winmail.dat >>


Jeff will be talking to Fielder on this.

SCE said at our meeting Monday that they DID NOT want to talk about these issues at the PHC -- they wanted to address it through the advice letters. This one shouldn't even be up an issue at all.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt.Pagano@sce.com [mailto:Matt.Pagano@sce.com]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:35 PM
To: Mara, Susan
Cc: dgrueneich@gralegal.com; dhuddles@enron.com; Diane.Romeyko@sce.com;
ehughes2@enron.com; gyoung2@enron.com; mday@gmssr.com;
mevans3@enron.com; Riley, Tom
Subject: RE: Pending DASR's for Existing Enron Customers

Hi Sue,

I'm sure you will agree that this is one of those issues that will be
discussed at the PHC.  Since the UDCs have been ordered to verify that DA
customers entered into contracts by the 9/20/01 suspension date, SCE is
using the 10/5/01 cutoff date to fulfill that requirement. Regarding the
UC/CSU system, they are on the list Enron provided by the 10/5/01 deadline.

Matt Pagano
Account Manager
ESP Services Division
tel-714-895-0222
fax-714-895-0347
Email-Paganomj@SCE.Com

                    "Mara, Susan"
                    <Susan.J.Mara@        To:     <Matt.Pagano@sce.com>,
                    enron.com>            <dhuddles@enron.com>
                                          cc:     <ehughes2@enron.com>,
                    11/02/2001            <gyoung2@enron.com>,
                    03:11 PM              <mevans3@enron.com>, "Riley, Tom"
                                          <Tom.Riley@enron.com>,
                                          <Diane.Romeyko@sce.com>,
                                          <mday@gmssr.com>,
                                          <dgrueneich@gralegal.com>
                                          Subject:     RE: Pending DASR's for
                                          Existing Enron Customers

Matt,

I thought I'd respond for Diann.  The decision is pretty clear on this.
As you recall, the issue was raised by UC/CSU who specifically mentioned
that the utilities were unilaterally setting deadlines for submission of
customer names and DASRs. Let me quote:

Section F, p. 19:

"In its rehearing application, UC/CSU seek clarification on whether
D.01-09-060's prohibition of any new contracts for direct access
services after September 20, 2001, allows or requires utilities to
refuse to process DASRs for an account under a pre-September 20
contract."

p.20:

"We reaffirm that for the time being, and unless the Commission states
otherwise in a subsequent decision, utilities are required to process
DASRs relating to contracts or agreements that were executed on or
before September 20, 2001, including DASRs for service to new facilities
or accounts if the underlying contract pursuant to which those DASRs are
submitted allowed for the provision of that additional service."

p.21

"For purpose of utility compliance with D.01-09-060, we want to make it
clear that, unless otherwise directed or allowed to in a subsequent
Commission decision, utilities cannot set a deadline after which they
could refuse to process DASRs relating to contracts excuted on or before
September 20, 2001."

Matt, these are just the highlights.  The Decision has more language
providing additional clarity.  By the way, this decision was mailed on
October 12 -- after your October 5 deadline. I think the Decision is
crystal clear.  You must accept all DASRs for contracts signed on or
before September 20 and you cannot set artificial deadlines after which
you will not accept those DASRs.

So, given the above.  Can you please explain your position?

Regarding the Novemver 1 date -- you may remember the Rule 22 meeting
held by the utilities, ESPs and customers in eaarly October.  The ESPs
agreed to make a good faith effort to provide a complete customer list
by November 1, with the understanding that additional names and
facilities could be added later with some verification process to ensure
the DA contract was signed on or before September 20.  We agreed to do
this to help the utilities meet their obligations under D. 01-09-060.
Enron has met that commitment.

Sue Mara
(415) 782-7802

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt.Pagano@sce.com [mailto:Matt.Pagano@sce.com]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 2:29 PM
To: dhuddles@enron.com
Cc: ehughes2@enron.com; gyoung2@enron.com; mevans3@enron.com; Mara,
Susan; Riley, Tony; Diane.Romeyko@sce.com
Subject: Re: Pending DASR's for Existing Enron Customers

Hi Diann,

It seems there is a bit of confusion.  I agree with you that there is no
longer a DASR submittal deadline in accordance with decision D
01-10-036.
However, SCE will only accept DASRs for those customers on the certified
list Enron provided by the 10/5/2001 deadline (see previous emails
supplied
below).  I'm not sure, but perhaps the 11/1 date you are referencing is
in
the Advice Letter filed jointly by PG&E and SDG&E?

Matt Pagano
Account Manager
ESP Services Division
tel-714-895-0222
fax-714-895-0347
Email-Paganomj@SCE.Com

                    dhuddles@enro

                    n.com                To:     Matt.Pagano@sce.com

                                         cc:     ehughes2@enron.com,

                    11/02/2001           gyoung2@enron.com,
mevans3@enron.com,
                    01:49 PM             TRiley@enron.com,

                                         Susan.J.Mara@enron.com

                                         Subject:     Re: Pending DASR's
for
                                         Existing Enron Customers

Matt, neither Enron nor the Commission agreed with SCE's arbitrary date.
Further, SCE's approach is in violation of the CPUC's decision on
rehearing
(D 01-10-036), which requires SCE to continue to accept DASRs as long as
the respective contract is signed on or before 9-20-01.

Therefore, Enron reserves the right to continue DASRing accounts for
eligible contracts until the CPUC directs otherwise.

Thanks.

Matt.Pagano@sce.com on 11/02/2001 02:39:09 PM

To:   dhuddles@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: Pending DASR's for Existing Enron Customers

Diann,

I received your attached customer list dated 11/1/01, however, per the
attached note sent to you on 10/03/01, SCE's deadline to submit a
certified
customer list was 10/5/2001. SCE will use the list you submitted on
10/5/01
@ 3:58pm (attached below) as your certified list.

(See attached file: SCE 011005.xls)

Thanks,

Matt Pagano
Account Manager
ESP Services Division
tel-714-895-0222
fax-714-895-0347
Email-Paganomj@SCE.Com
----- Forwarded by Matt Pagano/SCE/EIX on 11/02/2001 12:15 PM -----

                    Sheila Advani
                                         To:
                    10/03/2001           cc:
                    03:43 PM             Subject:     Updated Direct
Access
                                         Suspension Information -
IMPORTANT
                                         PLEASE READ NOW

As a result of input from the Rule 22 Working Group meeting held
yesterday,
October 2, 2001 in San Francisco, Southern California Edison is
extending
the date by which ESPs should provide the customer list information as
requested in the original SCE communication below.    Please provide a
certified list of customer information not previously submitted to SCE,
as
set forth in the original e-mail below, no later than

     5:00 p.m.Pacific Daylight Savings Time, Friday, October 5,  2001

This list should be sent via e-mail to Sheila Advani at
Sheila.Advani@sce.com.

We have attached the template below to use for your convenience.

(See attached file: DA Cust List Template.xls)

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Manager.

Original SCE Communication Sent on September 21, 2001

Pursuant to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) decision
issued yesterday, the right of end-use customers to acquire direct
access
service is suspended as September 20, 2001.  Specifically, the CPUC
order
states:

     "The execution of any new contracts, or entering into, or
verification
of any new arrangements for direct access
             service pursuant to Public Utilities Code Sections 366 or
366.5, after September 20, 2001, is prohibited" (Ordering
             Paragraph No. 4).

             and,

            "PG&E, SCE and SDG&E shall not accept any direct access
service
requests [DASRs] for any contracts executed
             or agreements entered into after September 20, 2001."
(Ordering Paragraph No. 7).

In order to comply with the CPUC order please provide Southern
California
Edison with a certified list of your direct access customers that have
written contracts or agreements executed on or before September 20,
2001,
for which DASRs have not yet been submitted.  This list may be subject
to
verification in the future, therefore, please be prepared to produce
evidence of these contracts or agreements upon request. The following
information must be included for each customer on this list for your
DASR
to be eligible for future processing:

Please include the following information for each customer on this list:

     ?    Customer Name
     ?    Service Account Number
     ?    Service Address
     ?    Contract Date

This list should be sent via e-mail to Sheila Advani at
Sheila.Advani@sce.com, no later than
     5:00 p.m. Pacific Daylight Savings Time, Monday, September 24, 2001

For those direct access customers that have certified contracts or
verified
agreements executed on or before September 20, 2001, ESPs must submit
the
respective "connect" Direct Access Service Requests (DASRs) within 30
calendar days following the effective date of the order.  All "connect"
DASRs submitted for accounts, which are not on the ESP's certified list,
will be rejected or canceled.  SCE will not process any "connect" DASRs
after 5:00 p.m., October 20, 2001.  SCE will continue to accept
"disconnect" and "update" DASRs (for changes to billing and/or metering
options) for existing Direct Access customers.

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Manager.

Sheila Advani
e:mail: Sheila.Advani@sce.com
Electronic Communications Coordinator
Southern California Edison -ESP Services
Westminster
(714)895-0240 or PAX 54240
Fax: (714)895-0347

                    dhuddles@enro
                    n.com                To:     matt.pagano@sce.com
                                         cc:
                    11/01/2001           Subject:     Pending DASR's for
                    03:01 PM             Existing Enron Customers

Matt, let me know if you have any questions about the data contained in
this file.  thanks!

(See attached file: SCE Pending DASRs 11-01-01.xls)

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
(See attached file: SCE Pending DASRs 11-01-01.xls)

(See attached file: SCE 011005.xls)
(See attached file: DA Cust List Template.xls)
(See attached file: SCE Pending DASRs 11-01-01.xls)

(See attached file: SCE 011005.xls)(See attached file: DA Cust List
Template.xls)(See attached file: SCE Pending DASRs 11-01-01.xls)


Gordon:  Please advise Carol, Mary and me.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001 08:59 AM -----

	Lisa Mellencamp
	03/21/2001 08:38 AM

		 To: Gordon McKillop/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: mariner

gordon what will the terms of the raptor swap on mariner be??
Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com


I'd love to.  It'd be good to get to know Lenos.

Cheers,
Steve

Vince J Kaminski
04/20/2000 02:09 PM
To: Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Confirm participation at Real Options Conference at Cambridge
U.-URGENT

Steve,

Are you interested in speaking at this conference?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000
08:10 AM ---------------------------

Lenos Trigeorgis <lenos@ucy.ac.cy> on 04/19/2000 05:32:27 PM
To: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Confirm participation at Real Options Conference at Cambridge
U.-URGENT

Vince

can you please check with Steve Leppard and ask him to confirm, and send to
me his position and title of his talk (if different from yours)?

Thanks very much again

Lenos

At 05:14 __ 04/19/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
>Lenos,
>
>My busy schedule does not allow me to attend.
>
>I would like, however, to recommend my colleague who works
>in London, Steve Leppard.
>He can make a very interesting and original  presentation on real options.
>Please, let me know what you think.
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Lenos Trigeorgis <lenos@ucy.ac.cy> on 04/18/2000 09:29:18 PM
>
>To:   lenos.trigeorgis@rogroup.com
>cc:    (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
>Subject:  Confirm participation at Real Options Conference at Cambridge
>      U.-URGENT
>
>
>
>The attached file contains the tentative program for two back-to-back real
>options conferences (a professional one for July 5-6, and the standard
>annual academic one for July 7-8) at Cambridge U.
>
>Your name has been provisionally included on the program. Please check all
>the information relating to you and confirm your participation as listed
>(or advice us of desired changes immediately).
>
>Thank you.
>
>Lenos
>
>
>
>Attachment Converted: "c:\drive_e\eudora\attach\4thconfsessions12.doc"
>
>
>Lenos Trigeorgis
>Professor of Finance
>University of Cyprus
>Dept of Business
>75 Kallipoleos, PO Box 20537
>CY 1678 Nicosia CYPRUS
>
>Tel: +357 2 892261
>Fax:        339063
>
>
>
Lenos Trigeorgis
Professor of Finance
University of Cyprus
Dept of Business
75 Kallipoleos, PO Box 20537
CY 1678 Nicosia CYPRUS

Tel: +357 2 892261
Fax:        339063


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/02/99 10:23
AM ---------------------------
From: Brent Hendry AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on 08/02/99 12:38 PM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor@ECT, Sara Shackleton@ECT
cc:
Subject: S?o Paulo - Updated PHONE LIST

---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/08/99 08:40 AM ---------------------------

Margaret Santos
30/07/99 08:49 PM

To:   Rio de Janeiro Brazil - Office Staff, Salvador Brazil - Office Staff,
Buenos Aires Argentina - Office Staff, Cuiaba Brazil - Office Staff
cc:   Rubena Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Melaine
Fernandes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lisa
Wolfe/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject:  S?o Paulo - Updated PHONE LIST

DEAR COLLEAGUES,

SOME CHANGES WERE MADE AT OUR S?O PAULO PHONE LIST.
IF YOU HAVE A PRINTED LIST (DATE 07/13/99), PLEASE, PRINT THE UPDATED ONE.

I'M ATTACHING TWO FILES: PHONE LIST and ASSISTANTS (with the names of the
bosses and their respective assistants)

FROM NOW ON, THE CHANGES WILL BE MADE EVERY LAST day of each month.

THANK YOU ALL !!!

(See attached file: PHONE_LIST.xls)                                 (See
attached file: ASSISTANTS.xls)

MARGARET SANTOS
Receptionist - S?o Paulo

 - PHONE_LIST.xls - ASSISTANTS.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by John Griffith/Corp/Enron on 03/30/2001
01:58 PM ---------------------------

John Griffith
03/30/2001 02:55 PM
To: Jeremy Wong/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: RE: Skew Project

I uploaded the skew vols with Margie's table.  She is going to check to see
if it hit the database.  Please mark the book (production) with this info.
Please call me at x.36247 if you have any questions.  Thanks.

John


Dan,

Per your request...

Thank you,
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001
01:53 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           01/09/2001 04:45 PM

To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, James R
Haden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Gas contracts for the listed meters

Please see the attached spreadsheet for the requested information.

Please let me know if you have further questions.

Thank you,
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001
04:43 PM ---------------------------

	Jill T Zivley
	01/09/2001 10:31 AM

To: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, James R
Haden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Gas contracts for the listed meters

George, Melissa has already gathered this info earlier. It may need to be
update, but please check with her first. Thanks.

Edward D Gottlob
01/09/2001 09:18 AM
To: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, James R Haden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Gas contracts for the listed meters

George,

The meters listed below flow into a section of line in East Texas that feeds
a paper mill.  The gas currently being produced is rich, if we lose the
market the gas production will have to be processed.  Processing will cost
HPL a minimum of $250k.  Here's the kicker, need this ASAP becase the market
wants to pull the trigger by Friday.

Here are the questions by meter, (this is important because processing
options are different for every meter:

1. who are the supply contracts with
2. can HPL terminate the contract for gas quality or did we waive the quality
requirements
3. what is the status of each contract, when does it terminate, is it in
evergreen, what are the notification procedures
4. what is the price on each contract
5. what did the wells produce in the latest available month
6. last but not least, do the contracts let us charge the producer for costs
incurred to bring the production up to pipeline quality

4112
9650
6027
5189
6411

Jim, are these meters correct?

Are there any questions I did not address?


Senator seeks $2 billion to stabilize power rates
?
The state legislator who pushed for deregulation of the state's  energy
industry now wants to set aside $2 billion in state funds to  help
prevent the same kind of skyrocketing utility bills that have  plagued
the San Diego area, the first California region to be deregulated.
The money could be used for any number of endeavors,  including
construction of state-run power plants, purchase of existing  privately
owned power plants or the takeover of the transmission system  for
energy in California, said Sen. Steve Peace, D-El Cajon, chairman  of
the powerful Senate Budget Committee.
http://www.capitolalert.com/news/capalert06_20001121.html
?

State contradicts power concerns
?
Contradicting months of dire warnings from energy suppliers,  state
officials Monday said California should have enough electricity  to
meet next summer's demands.? While stressing that new power  plants
still will be needed in the near future, California Energy  Commission
officials said the threat of blackouts and severe cutbacks next  summer
now seem unlikely.
http://www0.mercurycenter.com/local/center/energy1121.htm


in