Can I get this info from somewhere?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Domke, Jana
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:14 PM
To:	Weitekamp, James
Cc:	Denby, Michele
Subject:	IBIT

Hi James - know Michele has come to you with financial # crunching requests & she would have this time as well, but she's stuck in Duluth (airplane problems).

Anyway, we're putting together/coordinating preliminary bonus recommendations for EGS.  Do you have Q3 IBIT numbers for the various EGS Business Units such as EGS International/NEPCO, Azurix, etc. or is this information that I need to get from each group?

Thanks much./Jana


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Sherriff, John
Sent:	Tuesday, June 26, 2001 9:33 AM
To:	Whalley, Greg
Subject:	RE: Turkey, Poland and Italy

We have got people all over these things that know them inside and out.  This is all about managing the downside
since it all has been monetized away.  I would love to give them away but can not see any value to the
corporation in doing it at this time.  Once they have the other assets in order it might make sense to
reevaluate.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whalley, Greg
Sent:	26 June 2001 14:22
To:	Sherriff, John
Subject:	FW: Turkey, Poland and Italy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	James A Hughes
Sent:	Thursday, June 21, 2001 3:17 PM
To:	Greg Whalley
Subject:	Turkey, Poland and Italy

Greg:

Kevin Hannon and I were meeting yesterday to review various organizational issues and one thing he asked me to do was extend a one time only offer to take over the assets in Europe that don't really fit with their ongoing business - i.e. Turkey, Poland and Sarlux.  An additional question I had is whether you think that EWS continues to be the correct place for EEOS.

Your thoughts?

Jim Hughes


Yes he did, and i'm good with you starting full time down there next wk.  Maria and I have talked about it also.  df

From:	Martha Benner/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/20/2001 10:20 AM
To:	Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Ann Smith/ENRON@enronXgate, Emily Sellers/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	Start date for Martha on new job

Did Bill Cordes talk to you yesterday about the start date for me to move to his area?  He had mentioned to me about training with Virginia this week and possibly starting next week but that was before he talked with you.  Bill did not mention to Virginia what was decided on this and she just called me to see what I know.  I told her I would talk with you about it as Bill's is out of town for two days.

Thanks...........
Martha Benner


There are no rainouts in this league - so try to show up by 8:30


It might be worth it to add Long Term California to Greg's trader ID profile
- if it's not too much trouble. He said it was unlikely he'd use it, but
there's always the potential. No rush, of course. And thanks again for your
help.

Kate

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Samuel Schott                           03/16/2001 04:00 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: New (West) Power Trader or Mid-Marketer _ Greg Wolfe

Hello again Kate,

Please see the desks below that Greg Wolfe is attached, and inform me
if you would like me to link him to any other desks.

Rgds.

Samuel
713-853-9890
ENW _ GCP

---------------------- Forwarded by Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2001 05:56
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Samuel Schott                           03/16/2001 04:56 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: GCP_Houston, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect
Subject: Re: New (West) Power Trader or Mid-Marketer _ GCP Response -
Complete

Hi Kate,

Your request is complete, effective upon refresh of the EnPower System, or
3/17/01.

Let us know if Paul needs access to any other desks.

Best Rgds.

Samuel

   Kate Symes                03/16/2001 02:56 PM

To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: New (West) Power Trader or Mid-Marketer

Thanks for doing that so quickly. I just spoke with Paul and he said it would
be best to include every long term desk under his name since he will
potentially do deals with all of the traders -

Long Term Southwest
Long Term Northwest
Long Term California
Long Term West Management

Again, thank you, and please let me know if there's anything else I can do.

Kate

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Samuel Schott                           03/16/2001 12:20 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: GCP_Houston

Subject: Re: New (West) Power Trader or Mid-Marketer

Hello Kate,

I've added Paul Choi to the EnPower System, however, in order for a Trader or
Mid-Marketer
to have access to a Power Desk, he must be added to the specific desk by the
GCP Team.

Please supply a specific list of desks in which Paul Choi needs access.

Example Request(s):

Please add these Power Trader(s) to the following Desks: Paul Choi, Greg Wolfe

CP/ID 66189 (not required, but helpful)     EPMI Short Term West Hourly
CP/ID 56849  "     EPMI Long Term West Management

Thanks,

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_Enron Networks)

   Kate Symes                03/16/2001 01:49 PM

To: GCP_Houston
cc:
Subject: New Trader IDs

Thank you in advance for you help in adding this trader's name to the system:

Add this Power Trader to the EnPower: Paul Choi

Samuel Schott has told me that you would prefer to have the desk this trader
works for, but because Paul is a mid-marketer he works with several different
desks, including Long Term California and Long Term Southwest. Please let me
know if you need more information.

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/HOU/EES on 11/14/2000 07:24
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Rafael Avila                           11/13/2000 05:53 PM

To: lwells@wyndham.com, Ching Lun/HOU/EES@EES, Kim Chick/HOU/EES@EES, Angie
Ramirez/HOU/EES@EES, Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES, Christina
Barthel/HOU/EES@EES, Dara M Flinn/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Fwd: A woman and a man are involved in a car accident; it's a

You girls will love this. Ha-Ha

>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > A woman and a man are involved in a car accident; it's a bad one.
>>>>Both
>>>> > >of
>>>> > > > their cars are totally demolished but amazingly neither of them
>>>>are
>>>> > >hurt.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > After they crawl out of their cars, the woman says, "So you're a
>>>>man;
>>>> > > > that's interesting. I'm a woman. Wow,  just look at our  cars!
>>>>There's
>>>> > > > nothing left, but fortunately we are unhurt. This must be a sign
>>>>from
>>>> > >God
>>>> > > > that we should meet and be friends and live together in peace for
>>>>the
>>>> > >rest
>>>> > > > of our days."
>>>> > > > Flattered, the man replied, "Oh yes, I agree with you completely!
>>>>This
>>>> > > > must  be a sign from God!"
>>>> > > > The woman continued, "And look at this, here's another miracle.
>>>>My
>>>>car
>>>> > > > is completely demolished but this bottle of wine didn't break.
>>>>Surely
>>>> > >God
>>>> > > > wants us to drink this wine and celebrate our good  fortune."
>>>> > > > Then she hands the bottle to the man.  The man nods his head in
>>>> > >agreement,
>>>> > > > opens it and drinks half the bottle and then hands it back  to
>>>>the
>>>> > >woman.
>>>> > > > The woman takes the bottle, immediately puts the cap back on, and
>>>>hands
>>>> > >it
>>>> > > > back to the man.
>>>> > > > The man asks, "Aren't you having any?"
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > The woman replies, "No. I think I'll just wait for the
>>>>police..."
>>>> > > > Moral of the story: Women are clever bitches. Don't mess with
>>>>them.
>>>> > > >   >>
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>>> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
>>>>http://www.hotmail.com.
>>>> >
>>>> > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>>>> > http://profiles.msn.com.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Beginning November 1, 2001
Transwestern and Lonestar Gas Controls will no longer be able to use both points to balance.
We will need to flow the gas where it is scheduled until further notice.

If any questions please call
Thanks DS


Morning Debra,

Another Tug Fork deal was done 12/05/00, details as follows:

March, 2001
10,000 MMBtu per month
Price of 7.17
ENA - Buyer
Del.Pt: Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. - Appalacia
Deal # Q88741.4/266512

Please let me know if you need more information.

Thanks
Ellen


Tony,  Aug 26th


<<Commitment Letter - Sept 19.doc>>

Blair J. Fleming
Global Banking
RBC Dominion Securities

Tel: (416) 974-3987
Fax: (416) 974-2249/7376
email: blair.fleming@royalbank.com

 - Commitment Letter - Sept 19.doc


* IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED - Do Not Delete *
Executive Impact & Influence Program

Dear Scott Neal,

As part of the Executive Impact and Influence Program,
each participant is asked to gather input on the
participant's own management styles and practices as
experienced by their immediate manager, each direct
report, and up to eight colleagues/peers.

You have been requested to provide feedback for a
participant attending the next program.  Your input
(i.e., a Self assessment, if you are a participant in
this program, Manager assessment, Direct Report
assessment, or Colleague/Peer assessment) will be
combined with the input of others and used by the
program participant to develop an action plan to
improve his/her management styles and practices.  If
you are providing feedback as a Manager of the
participant, please note that your feedback will be
identified in the summary report.

It is important that you complete this assessment NO
LATER THAN CLOSE OF BUSINESS on Tuesday, May 1, 2001.

To begin the online administration process, you will
need the following Internet address and Password(s).
NOTE:  If you are providing feedback for more than one
person, each password and participant name is
individually listed below.

Open your Internet browser e.g., Internet Explorer or
Netscape Navigator, and please type or copy the URL
address below into your Internet browser (please DO NOT
go through Lotus Notes):

www.fsddatasvc.com/enron

D99UHK    (Mark Breese)

If you experience technical problems, please call
Dennis Ward at FSD Data Services, 713-942-8436.  If you
have any questions about this process, you may contact
Debbie Nowak at Enron, 713-853-3304, or Christi Smith at
Leadership Research Institute/Keilty, Goldsmith & Company,
619-216-0404.

Thank you for your participation.


FYI-

---------------------- Forwarded by Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000
09:16 AM ---------------------------

Brad Schneider
07/10/2000 09:02 AM
To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: United Oil & Minerals

I sent a confidentiality agreement to their CFO last week and have not
received anything back yet. He said that they were in no hurry to execute
trades.

Brad


Start Date: 1/28/02; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012823.txt


Sorry about that, I was working on the Teco O&M costs.  Thanks
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000
10:41 AM ---------------------------
From: Christopher Smith on 03/17/2000 09:57 AM
To: Yvan Chaxel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Petersen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald M- ECT
Origination Black/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: TECO

Please send me an excel spreadsheet which depicts the value that you see
associated with the heat rate spread option.  I want to make sure that I
understand exactly how you propose valuing the transaction and how this value
would be booked.  As such, please provide the following detail:

Will we be valuing/booking a series of monthly call options or a series of
daily call options?
What power curve are we valuing the deal against - PJM East or West Hub?
Please send me the current fuel curve that you are converting to $/MWh to
value the deal?
What volatilities are you using to value the options - monthly volatilities
or intra-day volatilities or a blend of the two (if blending please show me
what formula you using to blend the two vols)?
What expiration date are you using, i.e.: for monthly call options the 15th
of the relevant month, and for daily options?
What correlation are you assuming, 15% flat for twenty years?
Are you deducting all operating expenses from the value of the option?
Are you using the "SPRDOPT" Exotic Options function to value the option?
Are you using the $/MWh VOM dollar amount as your strike?
Has Don provided the fixed payment stream?  This stream should be covering
both P&I and not just principal.

Yvan, and Ben, please provide answers to these question via written
correspondence so that their is limited probability of misunderstanding.
Thank you both very much for your time and help thus far.  Furthermore, I
would like to reiterate that RAC's goal, prior to quoting any credit reserve,
is to be 100% confident that: (i) the methodology that is being employed is
consistent among the internal groups; and (ii) the inherent value of the
price risk management contracts matches.  This enables RAC to manage the
associated risk during the life of the transaction both effectively and
appropriately.

Regards,

Christopher


Here are CES's daily volume requirements.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03-21-00 daily volsAM.xls


Feast your eyes on Enron Business' cool and colorful new look.  You'll find
it in your mailbox at home and online at home.enron.com under Publications,
Enron Business, and "Volume 2, 2001".  (And if you're in Houston, you might
find a few extra copies at the Plaza Java in the lobby of the Enron Building.)

In this issue:
? Enron Direct plays hard to win small customers
? Extreme Enron debuts with exciting stories about employees who ride the edge
? Meteorologists brew science with good business
? Enron's new Vision ) how will we do it?
? Enron fights to keep the California energy crisis from spreading
? Driving business profits where you'd least expect them
? The Insider: Sprechen Zie security?
? Assisting earthquake victims in India
? Find out who won the Word Search ) and enter our Cartoon Craziness Contest
for a chance to win a $200 American Express gift certificate!  Don't dally )
the deadline for entries is Friday, May 11


1.  Be sure to verify that the underlying contracts do not allow cherry picking under any default scenario.  If it does, amend the express language.

2.  We have made 2 changes to the netting agreement forms on the basis of further review by Leslie Hansen of some provisions in our trading forms.  The first change is in paragraph 2(a) to clarify the definition of Default.  The second change is in paragraph 14(b) to delete the day limitation on claims of Force Majeure.  We feel this should not be included in any physical contract that will be included in a master netting agreement, especially because of the current international situation and security concerns.

See attached reline version to read the changes.

3.  No changes have been made to the Collateral Annex.

4.  Attached below are the new forms.  Rather than continue with forms with and without the user notes, I put the user notes in a separate document.  They are not at the back of the forms.  Simpler.

The attached forms are Master Netting & Security Agmnt 10 h a v1 (to use without collateral annex) and Master Netting & Security Agmnt 10 h v1 (to use with collateral annex).

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
(713) 345-7732
(713) 646-3393 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


These look fine to me.  Go ahead and forward to Brant if you are ready.

	Debra Perlingiere
	03/27/2001 01:58 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Sempra, Reliant, AEP

Revised  Article 4.6

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Edward Brady       did not interview
Chelsea Buras         did not interview
Lindsay Culotta        did not interview
Milagros Daetz         Finance/Credit
Miles Farr                   did not interview
Brad Guilmino           Origination/Finance   strong candidate
Stephanie Hopkins  Origination
Shereka Jefferson    Origination
Kevin Murray               Trading/Origination -  very strong candidate
Leonidas Savvas      Trading  - very strong candidate
Timothy Taylor            did not interview
Ryan Thibideau        Origination  - very strong candidate

Geynille Dillingham
10/30/2000 03:27 PM
To: Mary Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria LeBeau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benjamin Markey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: LSU Super Saturday Candidates

Sorry gang!!  I sent you the wrong contact spreadsheet information.  Here is
LSU.

Thanks, Geynille
---------------------- Forwarded by Geynille Dillingham/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
03:18 PM ---------------------------

Geynille Dillingham
10/27/2000 05:47 PM
To: Mary Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria LeBeau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benjamin Markey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: LSU Super Saturday Candidates

Hello Interview Team,

Please review the list of candidates that have been identified to come to
Super Saturday from LSU.  They are as follows:

Edward Brady
Chelsea Buras
Lindsay Culotta
Milagros Daetz
Miles Farr
Brad Guilmino
Stephanie Hopkins
Shereka Jefferson
Kevin Murray
Leonidas Savvas
Timothy Taylor
Ryan Thibideaux

Please identify who the best interviewer would be for each candidate (i.e. Ed
Brady - Commercial Interviewer or Finance Interviewer).  If you can remember
where you thought they were stronger, please indicate it so that I can ensure
that our candidates are properly placed for interview purposes.

Please call me if you have questions.

Thanks, Geynille

I have attached contact information for cultivation purposes.


Frank:

Attached is reference to the ITG agreement.  There is no file; I added the information to Lotus Notes in order to locate the agreement in the future.

Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Glover, Sheila
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 3:23 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Heard, Marie; Vitrella, David J.
Subject:	FW: Revised Agmt

Sara,
Per Saul, attached is the current version under discussion per ITG.  Saul said they had made many of the changes Cheryl had requested.

Sheila

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	ssarrett@itginc.com@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 1:12 PM
To:	Glover, Sheila
Cc:	kschliem@itginc.com
Subject:	Revised Agmt

Sheila,

As we discussed, I've enclosed the latest version of the market data letter I
had sent to Cheryl.
Please feel free to call me at (212) 588-4162 with any questions or to discuss.

Best regards.

Saul Sarrett

---------------------- Forwarded by Saul Sarrett/ITG on 11/07/2001 02:13 PM
---------------------------

Saul Sarrett
08/10/2001 03:39 PM

To:   cheryl.nelson@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Revised Agmt

Cheryl,

I've attached the revised agreement (Section G. added).

Best regards.

Saul

(See attached file: QuantEX Redistribution Letter Enron 081001.doc)

 - QuantEX Redistribution Letter Enron 081001.doc


The Confidentiality and subsequent Consulting agreement are between ENA and
Dr. Michael S. Haigh.
His phone # is 409-845-5819 and fax # 409-862-3019.

I would prefer documents sent to me and I will forward on to Dr. Haigh.

Thank you,  Elsa Piekielniak (x37613)


Sorry it has taken me a few days to get back with you, I had to leave town
unexpectedly and just returned today.  All of that sounds great, how about
putting the file in the O drive under erms/1intra/central.  Please name the
file EOL curves.  Please let me know if you have any problems.  Thanks for
your help on this matter.
PL


no problem, it is difficult to get the traders name with natsource, but i do
not have a problem with any other broker.

also 2 missing deals for bob with apb

sell ees
q3 01
25 mw
250.05
sp15

buy reliant
q301
25 mw
250.00
sp-15

   Kate Symes @ ECT                01/03/2001 04:30 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: natsource

488908 is with Tradition Financial Services, not Natsource. I've changed this
in the system.

488938 was just entered by Mike Swerzbin.
Buy Duke
57.00
Cal-07
25 MW
COB

And if it's at all possible to get the traders names from the brokers when
they have missing deals, that would be wonderful. I can usually guess by
using the information given, but sometimes the traders get busy and aren't
exactly happy about being bugged for missing deals that aren't theirs. I'm
not sure how it works, but Carla told me the brokers should give you all the
information at their disposal. If they don't, or won't, let me know and I'll
have our traders talk to them.

Thanks for your help,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
01/03/2001 01:57 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: natsource

488908
broker not showing

missing deal

buy duke
57.00
cal 07
25 mw
cob

thanks


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 26, 2001

Notice ID: 3216
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: REVISED-CAPACITY UPDATE EFFECTIVE FOR MONDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2001

                   CHANGES ARE INDICATED WITH AN *

Effective Monday, October 29, 2001, capacities will be as follows:

Excess MDWQ              Available +
ISS Withdrawals          Available
SIT Withdrawals          Available
Imbalance Drawdowns      Available

Excess MDIQ              Available +
ISS Injections           Available
SIT Injections           Available
Imbalance Paybacks       Available

PAL Lends/Unparks        Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks  Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Non-firm receipt capacity will be as follows:

TENNESSEE:

Brinker (B12)            20,000
Broad Run (B9)          300,000
Cambridge (B10)          20,000
Dungannon (B11)          20,000
Highland (B17)                0

NOTE: GAS RECEIVED AT HIGHLAND MUST BE DELIVERED IN THE NORTHERN PORTION OF
MARKET AREA 38 OR THE NORTHWEST LATERAL OF MARKET AREA 36, DIRECTLY NORTH OF
HIGHLAND.

Milford (B18)            20,000
North Greenwood (B22)         0
Unionville (B15)         50,000

NOTE:  EFFECTIVE THURSDAY, AUGUST 16, 2001, ANY SHIPPER UTILIZING A CONTRACT
THAT HAS A PRIMARY RECEIPT POINT(S) WITH THE FOLLOWING POINTS, MUST UTILIZE
THESE POINTS:

         Brinker       (B12)
         Cambridge     (B10)
         Dungannon     (B11)
         Highland      (B17)
         Milford       (B18)
         Unionville    (B15)

TEXAS EASTERN:

Delmont (C16)                 0
Eagle (C22)              20,000
Hooker (C9)              20,000
Pennsburg (C23)          20,000
Windridge (C12)          20,000

NATIONAL FUEL:

Independence (M1)             0
Ellwood City (L1)        15,000

TRANSCO:

Downingtown (E3)          2,500
Emporia I (E13)          60,000 *
Rockville (E2)                0
Dranesville (E1)              0

EQUITABLE GAS:

Hi Hat (F3)                   0

KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA (KYWV):

Beaver Creek (H1)             0

CNR PIPELINE:

Boldman (CNR02)               0
Conoway (CNR03)               0
Johns Creek (CNR08)           0
Canada (CNR09)                0
Canada (CNR10)                0
Stafford (CNR11)              0
Thacker/Majestic (CNR12)      0
Briar Mtn. (CNR13)            0
Huff Creek (CNR14)            0

CONOCO:                       0

Grant (P1)                    0

NOTE:  ANY APPALACHIAN PRODUCTION FLOWING DIRECTLY INTO COLUMBIA'S LINE KA
BETWEEN COLUMBIA'S BOLDMAN COMPRESSOR STATION AND COLUMBIA'S HUFF CREEK
COMPRESSOR STATION AS WELL AS PRODUCTION FLOWING INTO COLUMBIA'S LINES SM-116,
KA-15, PM-3, AND PM-17 IS 0 NON-FIRM.

ALGONQUIN:

Ramapo (R1)              75,000

ANR:

Paulding/Cecil           30,000
(F1, A2)

LEBANON AGGREGATE       100,000
(A4, F2, C4, D3)

TOLEDO AGGREGATE        100,000
(A3, F4, 734462)

COLUMBIA GULF:
(801)

TCO-Leach               700,000

Internal point non-firm capacity will be as follows:

Lanham                        0

Delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

TRANSCO:

Martins Creek            10,000
  (MLI E5)
Young Woman's Creek      10,000
  (MLI E9)

ALGONQUIN:

Hanover                       0
  (MLI R2)

EQUITRANS:

Fallen Timber            31,000
  (MLI K1)

Waynesburg-Rhinehart     20,000
  (MLI K2)

OPT-30 will be available in all market areas.
OPT-60 will be available in all market areas.

Market Area delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

Operating Area 1
     Market Area 33       No Restrictions
     Market Area 34       No Restrictions

Operating Area 2
     Market Area 20       No Restrictions

Operating Area 3
     Market Area 15       No Restrictions
     Market Area 16       No Restrictions
     Market Area 17       No Restrictions
     Market Area 18       No Restrictions
     Market Area 19       No Restrictions

Operating Area 4
     Market Area 21       No Restrictions
     Market Area 22       No Restrictions
     Market Area 23       No Restrictions
     Market Area 24       No Restrictions
     Market Area 25       No Restrictions
     Market Area 29       No Restrictions

Operating Area 5
     Market Area 02       No Restrictions
     Market Area 07       No Restrictions

Operating Area 6
     Market Area 10       No Restrictions
     Market Area 11       No Restrictions
     Market Area 12       No Restrictions
     Market Area 13       No Restrictions
     Market Area 14       No Restrictions

Operating Area 7
     Market Area 01       No Restrictions
     Market Area 03       No Restrictions
     Market Area 04       No Restrictions
     Market Area 05       No Restrictions
     Market Area 06       No Restrictions
     Market Area 08       No Restrictions
     Market Area 09       No Restrictions

Operating Area 8
     Market Area 26       No Restrictions
     Market Area 27       No Restrictions
     Market Area 32       No Restrictions
     Market Area 35       No Restrictions
     Market Area 36       No restrictions for southern part of Market Area 36.
                          Primary receipts/deliveries only for gas delivered
                          in the northern portion of Market Area 36.
     Market Area 38       No Restrictions
     Market Area 39       No Restrictions
     Market Area 40       No Restrictions

NOTE:  GAS DELIVERED IN THE NORTHERN PORTION OF MARKET AREA 38 OR THE NORTHERN
PORTION OF MARKET AREA 36 MUST BE RECEIVED FROM TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE AT
HIGHLAND.

Operating Area 10
     Market Area 28       No Restrictions
     Market Area 30       No Restrictions
     Market Area 31       No Restrictions

If you have any questions, please contact your Account
Representative.


Please plan on meeting in Jeff's office on Friday, May 25 at 9:00 a.m.
(Central).  Please let me know if you plan to participate in person or via
conference call.  If you are unable to attend in person, please call
612-332-0819 and use passcode 588470.  You will need to code to gain access
to the call.

Please call if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Joannie
713-345-7774


A Texas grad I work with found this on one of his alum sites.  The guy that
put this out - Flea- is the auburn guy who runs thetigeronline.com.  Pretty
funny.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001
01:08 PM ---------------------------
Eric Bass   02/08/2001 12:47 PM

To: Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad
Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay
Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tiger recruiting #1

Sorry, but this is funny . . .
http://auburn.nu/board/display.cgi?read=236745


Mike Kahn: 415.986.2800.  ext. 205.    Let me know how it goes.

Best,
Jeff

P.S.  And I mean this in all seriousness.....  Many months ago, you were
sitting in our small conference room and said, "The Governor needs to take
control and initiate a negotiation, or summit."  Looks like he finally
figured it out.


Further to my voicemail message yesterday I wanted to advise the outcome of
our latest discussions with John Greene and Gary Hickerson with respect to
the corporate structure for equities trading by London based employees.

The recommendation is that an agent (which will be a UK incorporated entity)
will incur the costs of those employees based in London. The UK agent will
arrange equities transactions in the name of ENA (ie. ENA will be the
principal to the trade) in accordance with a services agreement. The services
agreement will be supplemented by detailed daily instructions issued by ENA
employees based in Houston which will set out strict limits under which the
UK agent can arrange such equity transactions. Detailed procedures will be
drafted which if properly observed should prevent the establishment of a tax
presence for ENA in the UK (a deemed UK tax presence through the UK agent).
These procedures are being developed in conjunction with the relevant
commercial parties (John Greene, Gary Hickerson etc) to ensure that they are
both practical and effective and are not merely a "rubber-stamping" exercise
which would not afford adequate protection against the creation of a UK tax
presence for ENA.

Whether EEFT will be the agent or a newly incorporated UK entity is subject
to some further due diligence on the UK regulatory side. The strong
preference is not to use EEFT if possible.

Thus with regard to the Instinet trading system, the party which will execute
the trades as principal via Instinet will be ENA. The services performed by
the agent in arranging the transactions for ENA via Instinet, will need to be
governed by the same services agreement and procedures outlined above in
respect of offline trades.

I have not had the opportunity to discuss the above proposal with our
colleagues in ENA tax but they are familiar with the alternative scenarios
which were under consideration. If further discussion of this issue is needed
urgently I can be contacted for the rest of the week at the Swissotel,
Istanbul, Turkey (8 hours ahead of Houston time) - telephone # 90 212 259 01
01; fax # 90 212 326 11 22 or alternatively try mobile # (44) 77 88 437 195.
I will also be picking up voicemail on 44 207 783 5326.

Regards
Janine

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Tech contact for ITG Europe Platform installation - ENA and ECT
Investments, Inc.

As just described in my earlier E-mail on this matter, this raises several
concerns and is not a good idea.  It would be preferable to have one of our
foreign affiliates contract for the service.  Separately, it appears that a
form of trading for ENA is contemplated in London which, as we have
discussed, raises serious tax nexus concerns for us.  Consequently, I have
cc'd Janine Juggins on this E-mail so that she is aware of matters and can
explore to see what is actually contemplated.  Janine, I suspect that we need
to clarify on whose behalf people work while in London (EEL?).  I will be in
Canada this week and will try to speak with you while away but,
alternatively, you can speak with Janine directly and/or contact me at the
Hotel Vancouver in Vancouver, British Columbia.  Steve.

From: Sara Shackleton on 09/08/2000 08:45 AM
To: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Tech contact for ITG Europe Platform installation - ENA and ECT
Investments, Inc.

DOES THIS INSTALL PRESENT ANY TAX ISSUES?   HELP!  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000 08:43 AM -----

	Laurel Adams
	09/08/2000 08:11 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Tech contact for ITG Europe Platform installation

FYI...
---------------------- Forwarded by Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000 08:07
AM ---------------------------

John Greene
09/08/2000 04:25 AM
To: Julie Pechersky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyrus Kazak/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: jwhite@itgeurope.com, KSonderb@itginc.com, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Tech contact for ITG Europe Platform installation

Cyrus/Julie,

Can you please coordinate with Jamie White at ITG on this install.  I don't
really care how I get it.  I would presume that someone in our IT group
worked with ITG to determine the best delivery method on the original
install.  If so, please use the same architecture.  If not, please consider
the options and if we think there exists a better method than the one being
in Houston, let's upgrade the one in Houston concurrently with the London
install so the two sites are in synch.

This install will initially be for European equity trading only but we may
want to incorporate US equities at a later date as well.  Any activity on
this setup will be governed by the same agreements currently in place as it
will be done on behalf of both ECT Investments and Enron North America until
further notice.

Thanks and regards,
John
---------------------- Forwarded by John Greene/LON/ECT on 08/09/2000 10:03
---------------------------

	Enron Europe

	From:  Cyrus Kazak                           06/09/2000 10:59

To: John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Julie Pechersky/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Tech contact for ITG Europe Platform installation

John
Is this for European or US equities or both ?
Do you want to trade using Internet access or would you prefer a fixed link
leased line ?
If you could let me know
Thanks
Cyrus

John Greene
06/09/2000 16:31
To: Cyrus Kazak/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Julie Pechersky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jamie_White.ITGE@itginc.com,
KSonderb@itginc.com

Subject: Tech contact for ITG Europe Platform installation

Cyrus,

Can you please arrange for this installation on my desktop.  Please
coordinate with Julie Pechersky and Jamie White to ensure that my setup has
the same functionality as Selena Gonzales in Houston.

Thanks and regards,
John
x3-5534
---------------------- Forwarded by John Greene/LON/ECT on 06/09/2000 16:31
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  KSonderb@itginc.com                           06/09/2000 09:43

To: jgreene@enron.com
cc: Jamie_White.ITGE@itginc.com

Subject: Tech contact for ITG Europe Platform installation

Hi John,

Please have your technology person contact Jamie White at jwhite@itgeurope.com
(670-4200 in London) to schedule an installation of the ITG Europe Platform.
Good luck getting the office set up!

Regards,
Kathy 617-692-6500


The TradersNews hourly, daily and term indexes,  along with our industry
coverage, is available at www.tradersnewsenergy.com.
?
Bobette  Riner???????????????????????????????  Senior Power Markets
Analyst??????  TradersNews Energy713/647-8690FAX: 713/647-7552cell:
832/428-7008bobette.riner@ipgdirect.comhttp://www.tradersnewsenergy.com
?
?
 - DlyMrkt 021401.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000
05:14 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Moon                           07/05/2000 04:52 PM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cage -Termination Amount by Deal

Here are the values for Cage Gas Services by Deal #:

 DEAL #   VALUE
 N47413    $201,213
 N10445    $119,027
 NB0242    $448,521
   TOTAL     $768,761

edm

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Moon/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000 04:44 PM
---------------------------

From:  Debbie R Brackett
       07/05/2000 02:49 PM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Cage -Termination Amount

I've spoken with Eric Moon who provided Russell with the termination payment
amount ; he has agreed to breakdown the numbers by transaction.
He will send it over to us as soon as possible.

Dan J Hyvl
07/05/2000 01:31 PM
To: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cage -Termination Amount

Debbie,
 Lisa Mellencamp has requested that we include our summary calculation for
each Transaction being terminated separately, and specify the Deficiency
Payment Amount for the period of non performance to the date of
determination.  I believe that Russell previously stated that we terminated
the Transactions effective as of 6/19/2000.  For that reason why are the
amounts broken out for 6/20; 6/21-30; and 7/1-term?  She also wants to know
what rate of interest are we demanding from the Termination Date.  Once I
have the above information, I will send the attached letter as modified for
the above.

----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000 01:24 PM -----

	Russell Diamond
	06/30/2000 10:47 AM

		 To: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J
Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Cage -Termination Amount

Debbie,

Below is the termination payment as calculated by the Structuring group.
This is the amount we should use when notifying Cage of their payment owed
ENA.  I think we should send a letter out to them with the amount owed to
ENA.  I do not know if it is necessary to mention the draw on the L/C, which
we have received.

Thanks

Russell

---------------------- Forwarded by Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Moon                           06/30/2000 09:29 AM

To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Russell,

The costs for the Cage Gas Transaction are outlined below:

June 16, 2000 - June 19, 2000  = $9,537
June 20, 2000 = $2,272
June 21, 2000 - June 30, 2000 = $21,255
July 1, 2000 - End of Deals = $735,696
---------------------------------------------------------

TOTAL COST  =  $768,761

edm


Dear task force members,
Attached please find a draft report for us to discuss at the upcoming
conference call.  Also attached is a recent article in "Restructuring Today."
 I was given permission by "Restructuring Today"  for a limited distribution
of this article to this task force.  Rae

 - task force summary.PDF


6:30 tonight is great.  see you later....any ideas?

geresj@tdusa.com on 12/15/2000 01:31:30 PM
To: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: December 17 - 20

Re: your voice-mail, let's move the dinner to Monday the 18th at 6:30 p.m. (or
later if that is more convenient).

JRG

12/13/2000 08:34 AM
John Geresi
John Geresi
John Geresi
12/13/2000 08:34 AM
12/13/2000 08:34 AM

To:   Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: December 17 - 20  (Document link not converted)

Jeff -

Let's do dinner on the 17th.   I'd be happy to stop by your house for a quick
drink and tour.  I will assume 6:30 p.m. works unless I hear that this does
not
work for you. I look forward to seeing you on Sunday.

JRG

Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com on 12/13/2000 08:24:33 AM

To:   John Geresi/CIBG/TDBANK/US@TDBANK-US
cc:
Subject:  Re: December 17 - 20

Yes, Love to have dinner, either the 17th or 18th--you pick.  Let's have a
drink at my house first so I can show you the digs.  Sorry I couldn't make
it...last minute schedule problems...

Jeff

geresj@tdusa.com on 12/12/2000 04:02:50 PM

To:   Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  December 17 - 20

Jeff -

Jean and the boys will be heading to my parents for X-Mas on 12/17.  I am
in
Houston until the morning of the 21st, and would love to get together for
dinner
sometime during that interval.

Are you scheduled to be in town during that period?  If so give me a call
at
713.653.8207 (day) or at home at 713.522.9381.  I'll also be happy fill you
in
on what happened at the MFAH subcomittee meeting today as well.

JRG


Souad,

In connection with the confirm I sent you earlier, I am also attaching a form
of fax letter for transmittal of the confirm to the Counterparty.

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/25/2000 11:32 AM -----

	Tana Jones
	08/25/2000 09:53 AM

		 To: Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Grupo Califra, S.A. de C.V. Deemed ISDA


FYI: These are the results of the soft targets for Q1.


Mark, FYI - In my estimation this business is no bigger than Mexico or the
Toronto business ie) $25 to $30M in real value with reasonably high risk.  I
see no value in having two different agendas being pushed in S. America.  I
also believe that we could cut overhead and right size the organization and
not loose any capability.  Early estimations are a reduction in budgeted OH
by at least a third to one-half.  Did you or Jeff speak with Jim?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
04:17 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
11/22/2000 04:08 PM
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: See Attached

Jim, my understanding is that there continues to be some discussion on
whether there will be functional seperation of the retail and wholesale
businesses and to what extent and under what strategy these are undertaken.
I am not sure that we want to put ourselves in a box under any structure
until these things are completely ironed out eg) country managers et al.  I'm
not in agreement with any memo that further details the organization beyond
what was outlined in the original memo.  However, I am in agreement that this
needs to get resolved ASAP unfortunately Frevert and Skilling and most of the
first world is out this week.  I ask for your patience.

Lets discuss.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
04:00 PM ---------------------------

James M Bannantine@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/22/2000 05:37 PM
To: David W Delainey@ECT, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R
Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Miguel
Padron/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Randy Young@ECT
cc:
Subject: See Attached

Draft memo on the functional alignment of South America under the new
organization.  Would like to send out to the South America organization
tonight to give people partial information on work in progress.  Silence is
bothering people a lot and the company is at risk of losing people.
Definitive organization memo out in the coming days, after complete
coordination with wholesale and retail in Houston.  Look at the first version
of the memo.  Please reply with any comments asap.


Of course I remember you...I'm not that much of a flake.  How long have you
been back in Houston?  I actually saw you fighting the elevator crowd in the
lobby several days ago.  We should definitely get together.  Do you have
lunch plans for today?

Robin

Joanne Smith@ENRON
01/31/2001 10:34 AM
To: robin.rodrigue@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Remember Me?

Hey Robin,
It's been a while since I have talked with or seen you.  In case you forgot,
we worked together at LA Tech for Becky.  I am back permanently now as a tax
analyst.  I am in the rotation program and am working in 3AC for what used to
be EI for my first rotation.  I thought maybe we could get together sometime,
go to lunch, and chat.  I would love to hear from you.

JoAnne


I agree with Bob on #1.
I am indifferent on #2, but will vote with Bob because he is a nice guy.

> ----------
> From: 	Harshbarger, Robert[SMTP:bharsh@puget.com]
> Sent: 	2001, October, 08 10:24 AM
> To: 	'Hackney, Mark'; 'Grow, Lisa'; 'Lacen, Don'; 'DEMPSEY, JERRY';
> 'Cobb, Steven'; 'Scholtes, Diana'; 'Smith, Chris'; 'Fotiou, Demetrios'
> Subject: 	FW: WSCC Tagging practices
>
> Okay - our exchanges of e-mail were suppose to improve mutual
> understanding
> and it seems to keep getting deeper as I go.
>
> Two issues - 1) putting multiple transmission providers on the same path
> on
> a tag (stacking of parallel providers), and 2) transmissionless
> interchange
> (business practice #11)
>
> Number 1 - don't we in the WSCC want the ability to have tags that can
> contain multiple transmission providers on the same path?  For example
> PSEI,
> PGE, and BPAT are all TPs offering Johnday-COB service.  There could be a
> transaction that would utilize a reservation with each provider and it
> would
> be most convenient to stack all that information in one tag.
>
> Andy suggests the WSCC might want to come-up with an alternative, such as
> one administrator TP for the whole path.  Sounds like an RTO.
>
> So, if we have a choice, we prefer the ability to stack providers on a tag
> -
> yes???
>
> Number 2 - the transmissionless interchange.  I have been suggesting that
> we
> will continue on with our practice just using the TP that belongs to
> source
> (or sink) as stated in BP #11.  Andy doesn't think that'll fly in 1.7.
> What
> really concerns me is his statement that "Under 1.7, a CA cannot exist
> without a parent TP."  Funny, I always looked at it the other way around.
> I
> don't know what that means to SCL, CHPD, and other CAs who, up till now,
> have not registered as TPs.
>
> My example was a MIDC CA to CA transaction that has historically been at
> the
> bus without transmission.  The participants have traditionally used their
> interchange accounting systems to record these deals as scheduled
> interchange with another CA.  Transmission was not taken into
> consideration
> since the participants had owned and/or contract rights from MIDC to their
> systems.  In addition, it has been an easy way to path-it-out by sinking
> it,
> then creating separate transaction source at the same place.
>
> I did feel that this issue shouldn't be brought to IS's attention - that
> we
> would just work it out with our business practices.  What do you think?
>
> Bob Harshbarger
>
>
> > ----------
> > From: 	Rodriquez, Andy[SMTP:Andy.Rodriquez@enron.com]
> > Sent: 	Monday, October 08, 2001 9:23 AM
> > To: 	Harshbarger, Robert
> > Subject: 	RE: WSCC Tagging practices
> >
> > Robert,
> >
> > With regard to item 1, solution C was to communicate that WSCC could
> > explore any number of other options and propose them to either its
> > members or to the IS.  For example, TOs could be granted allocations of
> > rights sold through a single virtual Tariff Administrator.  I guess the
> > real goal was to pull the IS out of the decision making process and give
> > the control to the WSCC, and if the WSCC said "we are going to do option
> > a or b," then that would be fine - provided that a CONCRETE practice was
> > defined, so that everybody in the WSCC did it the same.
> >
> > Item 2 will be a problem in E-Tag 1.7, because of how it deals with the
> > relationship between TPs and CAs.
> >
> > In 1.67, a CA can exist independent of a TP (hence the simple fix of
> > adding a single dummy TP).  Under 1.7, a CA cannot exist without a
> > parent TP.  I think this will cause problems.  Theoretically, it is the
> > same answer as is used in 1.67, but I think it may be much more
> > confusing to many.  I would propose a formal practice, registered in
> > Policy or some other document, that indicates how this is done (for
> > example, create a virtual TP called "WSCC Title Transfer" and have WSCC
> > entities use that specific TP, or something like that).  This would go a
> > long way to reducing confusion about how each CA does business (I have
> > been told it varies form company to company, and even sometimes from
> > shift to shift).
> >
> > In your example, you indicate that "fake" transmission is being used.
> > You also indicate that there is no CA to CA interchange occurring.  What
> > is indicated by going from the PSEI control area to the PCW control
> > area?  If this is a title transfer, then it has been tagged incorrectly.
> > The only other interpretation I can make is that the energy is moving
> > from the PSEI control area to the PCW control area.  You previous
> > discussion seems to support this also.  I am not sure how dynamic
> > schedules or grandfather transmission relate, as those are required to
> > be tagged also, as they should be using transmission service.  I know
> > the WSCC has been violating that practice, and recently sought an
> > exemption form the IS, but at this point, the exemption has been denied.
> >
> > I would appreciate an explanation, as I am unsure I yet understand what
> > is happening.  Is it a title transfer, or is it interchange?
> >
> > Andy Rodriquez
> > Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
> > andy.rodriquez@enron.com
> > 713-345-3771
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Harshbarger, Robert [mailto:bharsh@puget.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 11:03 AM
> > To: Rodriquez, Andy
> > Subject: RE: WSCC Tagging practices
> >
> >
> > Comments were inserted in your letter contained in the body of your
> > original
> > e-mail.  I've copied and pasted that text into a Word document -
> > formatting
> > all screwed-up.
> >
> >  <<comments to IS letter.doc>>
> >
> > The posted WSCC business practice #11 reads:
> >
> > For transactions that occur at only one bus (i.e. no OASIS/GF
> > transmission
> > involved) use a willing TP on the second line with the same PSE as on
> > the
> > first line and the words "Single Bus" in the OASIS reservation field and
> > "7-F" as the Product.
> >
> > Guess we need to understand what it is about 1.7 that prevents someone
> > from
> > creating a tag for these types of transactions.
> >
> > A related issue to this is there CAs that are not registered as TPs.
> > So,
> > when Seattle City Light sells to Chelan PUD at the MID-C, who does the
> > transmission segment of the tag.  Neither has registered as a TP.  So
> > the
> > transaction just doesn't get tagged.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
> > > ----------
> > > From: 	Rodriquez, Andy[SMTP:Andy.Rodriquez@enron.com]
> > > Sent: 	Monday, October 08, 2001 7:14 AM
> > > To: 	Harshbarger, Robert
> > > Cc: 	Hackney, Mark; Grow, Lisa; DEMPSEY, JERRY; McIntosh, Jim;
> > Lacen,
> > Don
> > > Subject: 	RE: WSCC Tagging practices
> > >
> > > Bob,
> > >
> > > I did not get your attached file.  Please resend.
> > >
> > > I know that there is fake transmission that is supposed to be used
> > > today, but I continue to see situations where that is not applied.  As
> > > it stands today, the incorrect practice will function under 1.6, but
> > not
> > > under 1.7.  As such, I would like to see a definitive 1.7 practice
> > > defined and listed someplace so that ALL of WSCC has to follow the
> > > practice.  Otherwise, our West desk has no idea what is right or
> > wrong,
> > > and they end up having to memorize the ways that each provider likes
> > to
> > > see their tags.  That is unacceptable.
> > >
> > > Andy Rodriquez
> > > Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
> > > andy.rodriquez@enron.com
> > > 713-345-3771
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Harshbarger, Robert [mailto:bharsh@puget.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:57 PM
> > > To: Rodriquez, Andy
> > > Cc: 'Hackney, Mark'; 'Grow, Lisa'; 'DEMPSEY, JERRY'; 'McIntosh, Jim';
> > > 'Lacen, Don'
> > > Subject: FW: WSCC Tagging practices
> > >
> > >
> > > Andy -
> > >
> > > I marked-up your draft letter with comments.
> > >
> > > The second issue should be removed.  Our current practice is to
> > specify
> > > fake
> > > transmission for these bus to bus control area interchanges.  I think
> > > that
> > > will still be possible in 1.7.  In any event I inserted some related
> > > comments in that section, too.
> > >
> > > Robert Harshbarger
> > > Puget Sound Energy
> > > OASIS Trading Manager
> > > 425.882.4643 (desk)
> > > 206.604.3251 (cell)
> > >
> > >
> > > > ----------
> > > > From: 	Rodriquez, Andy[SMTP:Andy.Rodriquez@enron.com]
> > > > Sent: 	Friday, October 05, 2001 8:26 AM
> > > > To: 	osc@nerc.com
> > > > Subject: 	WSCC Tagging practices
> > > >
> > > > Please review this letter and make sure it is correct.  These issues
> > > > were brought up in our Phoenix tag training.  I will plan on sending
> > > to
> > > > the IS Monday morning.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Members of the IS,
> > > >
> > > > In our recent E-Tag 1.7 Training sessions, we had two common issues
> > > > brought up regarding the way tags are handled in the WSCC.  We would
> > > > like your guidance and assistance in regard to these issues.
> > > >
> > > > 1.) Jointly owned transmission
> > > >
> > > > In the west, several jointly owned transmission facilities exist.
> > In
> > > > these situations, one particular line or path is managed by operated
> > > > within a single
> > > > control area, but has several different Transmission Owners.  In the
> > > > East, I believe that we  address this situation by having one entity
> > > > administer a single OATT and the TOs receive transmission revenues
> > as
> > > > distributions from the administrator of the OATT (much the way that
> > > SPP
> > > > or MAPP distribute regional tariff revenues to their members).
> > > >
> > > > In the west, they have taken a somewhat different approach.  In this
> > > > case, each TO administers their own tariff.  So it is possible that
> > a
> > > > transaction could utilize more than one TP on the same transmission
> > > > segment.  In such a situation (and
> > > > common practice) for a tag to be written that could "stacks" TPs.
> > So
> > > we
> > > > might
> > > > see in a tag a three transmission providers all flowing on the same
> > > path
> > > > within the same Control Area:
> > > >
> > > > CA		TP	OASIS		PATH
> > > >
> > > > AAA	AAA	123456		POINTA/POINTB
> > > > AAA	BBB	234567		POINTA/POINTB
> > > > AAA	CCC	345678		POINTA/POINTB
> > > >
> > > > Is this representation of the transaction's physical segment valid?
> > > We
> > > > perceive several potential  have two solutions:
> > > >
> > > > a.) Tag as above for convenience
> > > > b.) Tag as a separate tag for each TP
> > > > c.) Indicate to WSCC that process is invalid, and let them determine
> > > > their own solution [note: there are only two possibilities here.
> > > Solution
> > > > c suggests a PSE can not buy transmission from multiple providers
> > for
> > > the
> > > > same path].
> > > >
> > > > Some concerns have been raised by some WSCC members that "solution
> > a"
> > > is
> > > > might be difficult during curtailment processing, as it is hard to
> > > > determine
> > > > which cuts should be made at what points.  However, other entities
> > > point
> > > > out that the tag does represent energy flow along a single contract
> > > > path, and the "stacking" really only identifies contractual
> > > > relationships (and as such, should be allowed).
> > > >
> > > > Regardless of how the issue is resolved, we encourage the
> > development
> > > of
> > > > a standard method for handling this situation, and believe that
> > > standard
> > > > should be developed by either the WSCC or the IS.
> > > >
> > > > 2.) Control Area Bus Transfers
> > > > [note: I'm not sure we can include this second issue because of the
> > > size
> > > > and scope of the issues surrounding it.  1.67 has required a minimum
> > > of
> > > > one transmission segment in the tag  and the WSCC worked around this
> > > > requirement by using fake PTP transmission segments.  The same
> > should
> > > > probably work for 1.7].
> > > >
> > > > In the west, there is the practice of moving energy to different
> > > Control
> > > > Area entities at a bus.  In the east, I we accommodate this through
> > > > title transfers and consider it a market mechanism rather than an
> > > > operations mechanism.  For example:
> > > >
> > > > Merchant MMMMMM Generates 100MW in Control Area AAAA
> > > > Marketer NNNNNN buys at the bus and sells to OOOOOO
> > > > Marketer OOOOOO buys at the bus and sells to PPPPPP
> > > > Marketer PPPPPP buys at the bus and wheels from AAAA to BBBB...
> > > >
> > > > In the WSCC, such transactions are tagged in a different manner.
> > > > [note: MIDC is not tagged like this - everyone is a PSE except for
> > the
> > > CA
> > > > generating and the CA sinking or wheeling away from the MIDC.  There
> > > is
> > > > not any CA to CA to CA to CA interchanges as long as the energy
> > > doesn't
> > > > leave the bus.]
> > > 	More typical are direct transactions specifying "fake"
> > > transmission
> > > (especially real-time):
> > > > CA		TP	PSE		OASIS		PATH
> > > INFO
> > > 	PSEI		PSEMKT					G@MIDC
> > > 	PCW	PCW	PAC01		NOR		MIDC
> > > L
> > >
> > > > The WSCC practice is not currently supported by E-Tag 1.7.  The
> > > > structure of E-Tag 1.7 is predicated on the fact that energy cannot
> > > move
> > > > between Control Areas without use of transmission.
> > > >
> > > > Historically, participants at the generator bus have found it more
> > > > efficient to track these energy exchanges at the bus as scheduled
> > > > interchange between their respective control areas.  In addition,
> > they
> > > > typically have owned transmission and/or long-term, grandfather
> > > > transmission rights to move energy to/from the jointly owned bus to
> > > their
> > > > systems via dynamic schedules.
> > > >
> > > > This issue has recently been discussed by the IS with regard to such
> > > > situations where transactions use NO transmission (i.e., energy
> > moves
> > > > between CAs across bus, with no transmission service).  If I
> > remember
> > > > correctly, the IS discussed several different issues:
> > > >
> > > > How can a single bus be simultaneously metered in several different
> > > > Control Areas?
> > > > If no physical movement of power occurs, why are these transactions
> > > > tagged?
> > > > If the power DOES move (even across a bus) then shouldn't that
> > > movement
> > > > be accomplished under a tariff?
> > > >
> > > > As I remember the IS resolution, it was decided that such
> > transactions
> > > > should indicate the use of PTP transmission if indeed power is
> > moving
> > > > between Control Areas.  Otherwise, the market turn approach used in
> > > the
> > > > East (illustrated in the first example) should be utilized.
> > > >
> > > > This specifically becomes an issue, as E-Tag 1.67 would allow the
> > > > current WSCC practice and 1.7 will not.  We would encourage the IS
> > to
> > > > make sure WSCC is fully prepared for this situation, and has WSCC
> > > > practices in place that address this issue.
> > > > Andy Rodriquez
> > > > Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
> > > > andy.rodriquez@enron.com
> > > > 713-345-3771
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > **********************************************************************
> > > > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> > > affiliate
> > > > and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
> > use
> > > of
> > > > the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
> > > disclosure by
> > > > others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> > > (or
> > > > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
> > or
> > > > reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> > > > delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
> > > hereto)
> > > > are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create
> > > or
> > > > evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or
> > > any of
> > > > its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and
> > may
> > > not
> > > > be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> > > > otherwise. Thank you.
> > > >
> > **********************************************************************
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 5:13 PM
To:	Walls Jr., Rob
Subject:	New Press Release Draft

Sorry I left you off the distribution!
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 06/07/2001 05:12 PM ---------------------------

Karen Denne
06/07/2001 05:05 PM
To:	Jeff Skilling/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Koenig/Enron@EnronXGate, Paula Rieker/Enron@EnronXGate, David Leboe/Enron@EnronXGate, James A Hughes/Enron@EnronXGate, Andrew S Fastow/Enron@EnronXGate, Joannie Williamson/Enron@EnronXGate, Sherri Sera/Enron@EnronXGate, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:	Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	New Press Release Draft

Attached is a new draft of the press release, which is scheduled to be released before the opening of the market tomorrow morning.  Please let me know tonight if you have any additional changes.

Thank you.
Karen

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


eSource Presents Free CountryWatch Training

This class will provide an introduction and overview of the CountryWatch product offerings and services including Country Reviews,
Country Wire, CountryWatch Data and Business Services components.  Identify how Enron employees can use the CountryWatch products in order to satisfy country-specific research and business needs.

   Attend one of our CountryWatch Sessions:

	July 30	1:30 - 2:30 PM	EB5C2
	July 30	2:45 - 3:45 PM	EB5C2
	July 30	4:00 - 5:00 PM	EB5C2

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

eSource Presents Northern Light Training

Harness the power of Northern Light at your desktop!

Northern Light is a business research engine providing simultaneous access to over 300 million web pages and a Special Collection of 7,000 full-text business research publications, including newspapers, journals, books, magazines, newswires, and reference sources.
Current news from over 50 worldwide newswires is updated every few minutes.

You will learn how to navigate through the Northern Light site, how to access the Special Collection, and how to set up custom folders and
Search Alerts that are specific to your business.

Attend one of our Introduction to Northern Light Clinics:

August 2	  8:30 - 9:30 AM 	EB564
August 2	  9:45 - 10:45 AM 	EB564
August 2	11:00 - 12:00 PM	EB564

The Cost is $25.00 Per Person
No Shows will be charged $50.00
* Please bring your Northern Light login ID and password. If you don't have one, a guest ID will be provided.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at 5-7928

Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.htm for additional training sessions and vendor presentations.


You have been selected to serve on the 2001 VP Performance Review committee.
This selection is based on your performance and recognizing that you possess
the behaviors we are trying to underline, encourage and reward through our
PRC process.

In serving on the committee we'd like to underscore the important role you
will play not only  with respect to the VP PRC, but also in setting the
standards and guidance for PRC's across Enron.

The PRC is the foundation on which our talent is managed and rewarded.
Therefore, it is critical that you give it your full attention, prepare
appropriately, and serve as champions for the process from an overall Enron
perspective.

A meeting of the PRC Committee is scheduled for  April 3, 2001, in the Enron
Building 50th Floor Boardroom to discuss mid-year 2001 PRC.
Tele-conference/Video conference will be provided where appropriate.

An agenda for the meeting is attached for your review and information.

Please contact Gina Corteselli (713-345-3377) or Jackie Martin (
713-345-3563) to confirm your participation.

Regards,

Dave


Drew, here's my first stab at a rehearing argument.  I did not go as far as I
could have because I really think we should argue that there should be no
limitation at all and that TW should be able to decide for itself what
capacity it can sell as firm.  Instead, I've proposed a solution that will be
less controversial, as we discussed earlier this week.  If you think this
passes the laugh test I can do some rewriting and circulate it.

My biggest concern is portraying PNM's capacity as "firm" or "interruptible"
since PNM does not use that terminology, in its tariff or otherwise, except
to assure us over the phone that it is firm!  I'd like to check to see if PNM
is comfortable with all this before we file anything.

Call when you can; this is not due 'til Oct. 15.


Feel free to send it along.  But as you know, things are somewhat difficult these days.  I'll get it to the right people, however.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Redding, John R. (PS, NE) [mailto:john.redding@gene.GE.com]
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 4:24 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Angelides Trying to Turn Up Heat on Loretta

Hi Jeff,

I have started looking about for a position in government affairs or project development/permitting. Would it be possible for me to e-mail my resume to you and ask you to pass it along to the appropriate person?

Regards,

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:28 PM
To:	Delaney Hunter
Cc:	brbarkovich; cra; derek.naten; dominic.dimare; drothrock; ek; Redding, John R. (PS, NE); jstewart; kmccrea; mkahl; vjw; wbooth; mkahl
Subject:	Angelides Trying to Turn Up Heat on Loretta

Calif. power bond delay may lead to large deficit
NEW YORK, Sept 27 (Reuters) - California state Treasurer Philip Angelides said Thursday the state could face a $9.3 billion budget deficit in the 2002-2003 fiscal year if $12.5 billion of power bonds are not sold before July 2002.
The treasurer is certain the bonds will be sold, but he released the figures in an attempt to pressure the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) into actions it must take in order to sell the bonds.
"What I am concerned about is the fact this law has not been effectuated eight months after it was passed," Angelides said in a telephone news conference in Sacramento, referring to a law passed in February setting the biggest municipal bond sale ever in motion.
The state depleted its general fund by at least $6.2 billion buying electricity to keep power flowing and must sell the bonds in order to refill the state's general fund and make future power purchases.
"There can be no schedule (for the bond sale) until the PUC completes its work," Angelides said.
Earlier this week the PUC said the much-delayed meeting is now set for Oct. 2.
Angelides said PUC Commissioner Jeff Brown, one of five, is on board to make the vote, but President Loretta Lynch and other commissioners, "are not ready to act."
Lynch said earlier this week that she wants more time to work out details with Angelides and the Department of Water Resources concerning the money and terms of the rate order and rate agreement.
How the money from rate increases approved in May will be split up to pay for the bonds and to reimburse troubled power utilities and giving the Department of Water Resources the authority to sell the bonds, still need to be decided by the PUC.
Angelides is projecting a $3.1 billion budget deficit for the 2002-2003 fiscal year, even if the bonds are sold in time, due to reduced revenues as the overall U.S. economy slows.
In a worst case scenario, Angelides added that with the bond sale, the $3.1 billion gap may grow to $4 billion, while a late sale would push the $9.3 billion number to $10.2 billion.
The treasurer painted a dire picture of California 's budget if the bonds are not sold, likening it to the state's budget problems of the early 1990s.
Angelides warned a 2 percent sales tax increase might have to be put in place, or possibly a $1,574 per student cut in state K-12 education spending.
Or, the state could drop all spending on the University of California and California State University and save $6 billion.
Eighteen percent of the state's non-education budget would need to be cut if the bonds are not sold, he said.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Mackey/SF/ECT on 04/10/2000 04:03 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Esther Lee" <elee@alacritech.com>
04/10/2000 02:58 PM

To: "Simon Wong" <Simon@SkyStream.com>, "Jeannine Tinsley"
<JT@jobjungle.com>, Tim_C_Bush@notes.seagate.com, "Taillie, Larry"
<larryt@waccess.com>, "Bonnie Row" <BonnieRow@compuserve.com>, "Debra Rosler"
<drosler@ispchannel.com>, PLHOUCK@aol.com, pheinecke@wsgr.com, "CAROL
MURATORE" <cmuratore@roadrunner.com>, "Milunovich, Steven (RSCH)"
<Steven_Milunovich@ml.com>, mchan@netapp.com, "Matthews, Joseph J"
<joseph.j.matthews@rssmb.com>, Lisa Mackey/SF/ECT@ECT, lwirnowski@wsgr.com,
Linda.Makaipo@corp.sun.com, "Jim Lawson" <jlawson797@aol.com>,
jason.greenberg@csfb.com, hmassey@wsgr.com, "A PHI GIRL" <APHIGIRL@aol.com>,
"takashi Fukuda" <fukuda@nelco.com>, "Tom Fuerte"
<tom_fuerte@corp.adaptec.com>, FNervo@aol.com, "Michael Fales"
<mike.fales@psscomm.com>, DeCre2000@aol.com, danny.wallace@us.pwcglobal.com,
cmarion@wsgr.com, "James Cihla" <jcihla@AccessLan.COM>,
brian.bonazzoli@compaq.com, "Lisa Blase" <lisa@syncinc.com>
cc:
Subject: Re:  Alacritech announced first product today.  Article from
InfoWorld attached

Alacritech looks to off-load TCP/IP processing into the silicon of the NIC
 - att1.htm


Do you know what to do here?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000 04:13 PM -----

	Larry Joe Hunter
	08/21/2000 03:54 PM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Swap deal with EPMI Long Term Hedge

Susan/Tana,

We have recently traded a deal on Enron Online in which the entity offering
the trade was ENA and the entity entering the trade was EPMI Long Term Hedge
(Power group hedging with ENA).  This is currently booked as RMT vs. EPMI
Long Term Hedge.  Can we send out a confirmation based on ISDA terms since
this is an Enron subsidiary per Global Counterparty?  I'm assuming this is
just like doing a deal with Enron Global Exploration and Production, EES or
ECT International, but let me know if I'm incorrect.

Thanks,
Joe


Red Cedar - I am working with Operations and Facility Planning to coordinate the tie-in of the new receipt point in the La Plata Station yard.  All parties have agreed to the tie-in sometime between 4/2 - 4/5.  I will provide the required notification to NWPL once Planning notifies me of the estimated downtime and resulting cut in flows.

Expansion - Coordinating all groups to define project and begin pulling together documentation for FERC filing.

El Paso Field Services - EPFS has requested a meeting with TW Operations for next week to discuss the appropriate facilities needed to meet our specifications.  I have worked with Rich Jolly and Eric Faueucheau (?) in identifying the appropriate person to attend.


Here is the second list.  Michelle

-----Original Message-----
From: Webb, Jay
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 8:08 PM
To: Cash, Michelle
Subject: EnronOnline developers

Hi Michelle,

The attached spreadsheet should represent a complete set of developers of EnronOnline since inception.  I haven't named the individual Valtech and Agency.com developers since the agreements we have with those companies presumably cover all of their developers.

The rest of the systems will probably not be done until tomorrow.

--jay


Andrew, etal

I wanted to provide an update on what people should expect on monday in respect to payment proposals.  We initiated test files on Thursday & Friday, to validate the distribution list and allow the BU Approvers & Delegates to get a feel for the data  We experienced some email address issues that have been corrected.  There are some additional names that were provided late Friday that will be added on Monday.  If your name was added by Andrew on Friday, you will not receive the files until Tuesday.

Expect data by Company type.

Non-dip companies - Reports will include all unpaid open items that have not been blocked for payment.  You should be marking the items that you DO NOT WANT to pay in the file & forwarding it to George Wasaff.  We will only release the items authorized by the BU & the cash committee.

Dip Companies - We will not be running a proposal for the DIP companies on Monday.  We are still working with the BU's to ensure that they have properly blocked the pre-petition open items posted to the commodity vendors before sending the proposals for approval.  We expect to finalize this on Monday so we can start the process on Tuesday.  It is imperative that this activity be completed before initiating this daily process.  When we run these on Tuesday, I would not really expect that many items.  We have not begun to process the post-petiton non-trade invoices.  We have been working to establish a process for segregating these invoices as well and have blocked posting of December activity until everyone was ready.  We expect to open up December on Monday.

I feel very confident that we will be ready to initiate this process for the Dip Companies on Tuesday.  If you have any questions or concerns, please give me a call at 5-5301 or drop me email.

Thanks
Sheila


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Enron-wide Operations Controller Forum

Date:		10/23/2000
Time:		8:00 AM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Notice # 01-168
May 17, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX and COMEX Members and Member Firms

FROM:
Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:
Revised Implementation Date for New NYMEX Rule 9.11A (&Give-Up Trades8)

DATE:
May 16, 2001
===========================================================
Previously, in Notice to Members #01-154, the Exchange stated that new NYMEX
Rule 9.11A
(&Give-Up Trades8) would go into effect on June 1, 2001.  The Exchange is
revising the implementation timeframe in order to provide Floor Members and
Member Firms with additional time to obtain necessary records and become
compliant with the requirements.  Accordingly, please be advised that this
rule now will go into effect beginning on the trade date of August 1, 2001.
Further, it is anticipated that a similar rule will be implemented for the
COMEX Division following final review and approval by the COMEX Governors
Committee.

! In the absence of an applicable give-up agreement, new Rule 9.11A will
define the respective responsibilities/obligations to an order of executing
brokers, customers and Clearing Members.

! The term &executing broker8 as used in Rule 9.11A refers to the registered
billing entity, Member Firm or Floor Broker to whom the order is transmitted.

! Rule 9.11 will provide that, in the absence of an applicable give-up
agreement, a Clearing Member may reject a trade only if: (1) the trade
exceeds trading limits established by the Clearing Member for that customer
that have been communicated to the executing broker as provided by the rule
or (2) the trade is an error for which the executing broker is responsible.

! The new rule also places affirmative obligations on executing brokers to
confirm Clearing Member authorization for an account.  For example, prior to
an executing broker accepting and executing an initial order for any new
customer account, such executing broker must confirm with the Clearing Member
by telephonic, electronic or written means, that:
(a) the customer has a valid account with the Clearing Member;
(b) the account number;
(c) the brokerage rate;
(d) the customer is authorized by the Clearing Member to place orders with
the executing broker for that account; and
(e) a listing or summary of persons authorized to place orders for that
account.
Moreover, the executing broker must retain a copy of the authorization or the
specifics of the telephonic confirmation, which includes: opposite party,
date, time, and any other relevant information.  The Compliance Department
will conduct periodic audits of such records, and falsification of such
information shall be the basis for disciplinary action.

If you have any questions concerning this new rule, please contact Bernard
Purta, Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Operations, at (212)
299- 2380; Thomas LaSala, Vice President, NYMEX Compliance Department, at
(212) 299-2897; or Arthur McCoy, Vice President, Financial Surveillance
Section, NYMEX Compliance Department, at (212) 299-2928,

NEW RULE 9.11A (&Give-Up Trades8)

(Entire rule is new.)

Rule 9.11A Give-Up Trades

In the absence of a give-up agreement whose terms and conditions govern the
responsibilities/obligations of executing brokers, customers and Clearing
Members, the following rules shall define the respective
responsibilities/obligations of those parties to an order.  The &executing
broker8, as used in this rule, is the registered billing entity, Member Firm
or Floor Broker to whom the order is transmitted.

(A)   Responsibilities/Obligations of Clearing Members

(1). Limits Placed by Clearing Member.   A Clearing Member may, in its
discretion, place trading limits on the trades it will accept for give-up for
a customer,s account from an executing broker, provided however, that the
executing broker receives prior written or electronic notice from the
Clearing Member of the trading limits on that account.  Notice must be
received by the executing broker in a timely manner.  A copy of such notice
shall be retained by the Clearing Member.

(2). Trade Rejection.  A Clearing Member may reject (&DK8) a trade only if:
(1) the trade exceeds the trading limits established under Section I(A) of
this rule for that customer and it has been communicated to the executing
broker as described in Subsection (A); or (2) the trade is an error for which
the executing broker is responsible.  If a Clearing Member has a basis for
rejecting a trade, and chooses to do so in accordance with the provisions of
Rule 2.21(B), it must notify the executing broker promptly.

(3). Billing.  A Clearing Member will pay all floor brokerage fees incurred
for all transactions executed by the executing broker for the customer and
subsequently accepted by the Clearing Member by means of the ATOM system.
Floor brokerage fees will be agreed upon in advance among the Clearing
Member, customer and the executing broker.

(B) Responsibilities/Obligations of Executing Brokers

(1) Customer Order Placement.  An executing broker will be responsible for
determining that all orders are placed or authorized by the customer.  Once
an order has been accepted, a broker or the broker,s clerk must:

(a) confirm the terms of the order with the customer;
(b) accurately execute the order according to its terms;
(c) confirm the execution of the order to the customer as soon as
practicable; and
(d) transmit such executed order to the Clearing Member as soon as
practicable in accordance with Exchange Rules and procedures.

2. Use of Other Persons.  Unless otherwise agreed in writing, the executing
broker is allowed to use the services of another broker in connection with
the broker,s obligations under these rules.  The executing broker remains
responsible to the customer and Clearing Member under these rules.

3.  Executing Broker Responsibility for Verifying Clearing Member
Authorization.  Prior to a broker accepting and executing an initial order
for any new customer account, the executing broker must confirm with the
Clearing Member by telephonic, electronic or written means, that:
(f) the customer has a valid account with the Clearing Member;
(g) the account number;
(h) the brokerage rate;
(i) the customer is authorized by the Clearing Member to place orders with
the executing broker for that account; and
(j) a listing or summary of persons authorized to place orders for that
account.
The executing broker must retain a copy of the authorization or the specifics
of the telephonic confirmation, which includes: opposite party, date, time,
and any other relevant information.  The falsification of such information
shall be the basis for disciplinary action.

4. Rejection of Customer Order.  Where an executing broker has confirmed
Clearing Member authorization to execute orders on behalf of a customer in
accordance with this Rule 9.11A, the broker may, in the broker,s discretion,
reject an order that the customer transmits to the broker for execution.  The
broker shall promptly notify the customer and the Clearing Member(s) of any
such rejection.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(01-168)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Aha!  Sorry I didn't remember sooner that Taffy sent it to me electronically.  Anyway, this should make things much easier.  Please let me know if you need anything else, I'll keep you posted on the bids.  By the way, does Enron have a preferred form of payment?  Oxy wanted to know if we wanted cash or check (?!?).  Isn't a wire transfer what we usually do?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Milligan, Taffy
Sent:	Monday, June 04, 2001 5:27 PM
To:	Rainer, Eva
Cc:	White, Ann Elizabeth
Subject:	Cash Sale - Napoleonville - Texas Brine

Per your request.

Taffy Milligan
Sr. Admin Assistant
EWS-Legal
Tele: 713-345-7373
Fax:  713-646-6058


Let me know what else you need.  I just gave you the blended 7X16 price - and
you can do whatever averages you want!

Claire


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001
04:52 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Irena D Hogan                           01/11/2001 09:45 AM

To: John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Couch/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Risk Management Team Building

Please see the attached document below, per format of information to be
presented
 at the Risk Management Off-site.

If you have any questions, please give me a call, x36143.

This off-site will take place as follows:

     Friday, February 16, 2001
        Kingwood Country Club
     1700 Kingwood Lake Trail
          Phone - 281-358-2171
      in the Pine Room
            Start Time 8:30AM

See Below Map

Driving Directions

Take US-59 N.
Take the exit towards KINGWOOD DR.
Turn RIGHT onto KINGWOOD DR.
Turn RIGHT onto LAKE KINGWOOD TRL.


When Bill Miller calls to sell megawatts for a minimum price,   make sure
that you follow up with an adjustment bid to ensure that fixed price.
If you are confused on whether to adjust or not,  ask him well before the
deadline to adjust bid.

We had some confusion on this issue on Friday.    If you have any questions
on this issue let me know.

JMF


Go ahead and make those changes.

D

Tom Acton@ENRON
04/20/2000 07:02 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: wellheads

Daren,   Cody has a new well coming on Friday behind the 985333.  Right now
we don't have any nominations at that meter so I'll get with vance on that .
The increases according to the fax is going from 230@day to 1700 on friday
and 1700 to 3200 on sat.  PRIZE Energy would like to make some changes,

Meter

4028       from 1270 to 820          has been flowing from 600 to 800 this
month

4965       from 112 to 45                has been flowing mid 80's this month
                 from 97 to 104


Please remember that our current auction begins closing Sunday, Oct. 7, at 9
p.m. US Eastern Time. So you still have plenty of time to bid on our
extraordinary wines.

Hunting for values? Browse through lots without bids. With holiday season
just around the corner you especially may want to consider bidding on
vintage port, champagne and dessert wine. We have:  Margaux 1970, $100;
Haut-Brion 1996, $150; Latour 1998, $150; Opus One 1987, $170; Dom Perignon
1964, $250; PlumpJack Reserve Two Pack 1997, $260; Barbaresco (Gaja) 1993,
$280; Turley Cellars Zinfandel 1997, a 7-bottle horizontal, $390; Petrus
1997, $500; Fonseca 1997, a 12-bottle case, $720; Harlan Estate 1997 (a
Parker 100 point wine), a 6-bottle case, $2,900; and Screaming Eagle 1997
(another Parker perfect 100), 3-bottle case, $3,600.
Find these and other terrific values here:
http://www.winebid.com/lwb/lwb13.shtml

Take a look also at some of the hot new releases in Winery Direct. These
limited-production wines come straight from the boutique California wineries
that make them. In this auction we feature Hengehold Family Vineyards Merlot
1999, a new release and a great buy at $25 a bottle. Also offered is Paul
Hobbs Richard Dinner Vineyard Agustina Chardonnay 1997 in
never-before-released 3- and 5-liter bottles. Robert M. Parker Jr. rated
this wine at 92 points and called it "a blockbuster Chardonnay." We also
have Spottswoode Cabernet Sauvignon 1998 and Stag's Leap Wine Cellars
Cabernet Sauvignon 1997.
Find them here: http://www.winebid.com/home/spotlight6.shtml

Finally, taste California winemaking history in our Beaulieu Vineyard
Georges de Latour Private Reserve verticals. Admired for more than 50 years
for its grand Cabernet Sauvignons, BV Georges de Latour was one of the first
vineyards in California to make truly great wines. We offer the full range
of Private Reserve vintages from 1958 to 1997. As an example of the life of
this producer's wine, James Laube awarded 98 points to the 1958 vintage and
noted several years ago that "wine doesn't get much better."
http://www.winebid.com/home/spotlight1.shtml

If you click on a link in this email and it doesn't open properly in your
browser, try copying and pasting the link directly into your browser's
address or location field.

Forget your password?:
http://www.winebid.com/os/send_password.shtml
To be removed from the mailing list, click here:
http://www.winebid.com/os/mailing_list.shtml
Be sure to visit the updates page for policy changes:
http://www.winebid.com/about_winebid/update.shtml


This deal is in under Short Term California, not Long Term Northwest, and the
trader is Phil Platter, not Mike Swerzbin, and there is no broker. Are you
sure this is the deal in question?

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/12/2001 11:35 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 297846

Kate, for deal 297846 (Mike Swerzbin) Prebon says the broker fee should be
$.0075 and we show no fee.

Please advise.

Thanks!!


you can cook this for me!

kb <daphneco64@yahoo.com> on 01/12/2001 12:10:02 PM
To: eric.bass@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: EMAZING Recipe of the Day - Linguine Puttanesca

Hi E,

Thought you might find this recipe appealing.  Have a
great day.  LU-M
--- EMAZING <recipe-text-1441822CH@rtn.emazing.com>
wrote:
> Reply-to: <recipe-text-1441822CH@rtn.emazing.com>
> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:25:32 GMT
> Subject: EMAZING Recipe of the Day - Linguine
> Puttanesca
> From: EMAZING
> <recipe-text-1441822CH@rtn.emazing.com>
> To: EMAZING <recipe-text-1441822CH@rtn.emazing.com>
>
> EMAZING - http://www.emazing.com
>
> Proudly Presents
>
> The EMAZING Recipe of the Day - (TEXT)
> Friday January 12, 2001
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------
> FREE $5 at HALF.com
> Are you getting your Books, CDs, DVDs, & Video Games
> for
> HALF off? At Half.com get up to 50-90% off the list
> price
> everyday.  We,ve got The Matrix, American Pie, U2,
> Dixie
> Chicks and much more.  For a limited time, get $5
> off your
> first purchase of $10 or more.
> http://click.emazing.com/ads/half/text5.html
>
---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Linguine Puttanesca
>
> Serve this meatless entree with a salad and bread to
> make a
> satisfying meal.
>
> Serves 4
>
> 1 pound Linguine, cooked, drained, and rinsed
> 1/3 cup Olive oil
> 3 cloves Garlic, minced
> 1/4 teaspoon Crushed red pepper flake
> 2 1/2 cups Tomatoes, diced
> 1/2 cup Black olives (pitted), coarsely chopped
> 2 Tablespoons Capers
> 2 Tablespoons Basil, fresh, chopped
> To taste Salt and pepper
>
> Heat the oil in a large skillet over low heat. Add
> the
> garlic and crushed pepper and heat for 3 minutes (do
> not
> brown). Add the tomatoes and cook for 5 minutes. Add
> the
> olives, capers, and basil and cook for 3 minutes
> longer.
> Toss in the cooked linguine. Serve warm.
>
> - Nick Sundberg
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Email a copy of this tip to a friend
>
http://www.emazing.com/cgi-bin/mtaf.cgi?date=01-12-2001&list_id=recipe&brand=e
mazing
>
> Browse the archives
> http://www.emazing.com/archives/recipe
>
> Unsubscribe
> http://www.emazing.com/unsub/recipe
>
> EMAZING Home
> http://www.emazing.com
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------
>
> DEALS OF THE DAY
>
> RECIPE BOOK OF THE DAY
> Gwen McKee: The Recipe Hall of Fame Cookbook
>
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1893062082/emazing
>
> Conversion Tables
> Click here to convert weights and measures between
> Metric and U.S. Standards.
> http://www.cambridgeculinary.com/html/equiv.html
>
> BOOK OF THE DAY
> Brad Meltzer: The First Counsel
>
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0446527289/emazing
>
> CD OF THE DAY
> Tim McGraw: Greatest Hits
>
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00004ZAZH/emazing
>
> GIFT OF THE DAY
> Diamond Rio 600 32MB Digital Audio Player
>
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00004SPUN/emazing
>
> MOVIE OF THE DAY (DVD)
> Billy Crystal: When Harry Met Sally
>
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00003CXDC/emazing
>
> MOVIE OF THE DAY (VHS)
> Tobey Maguire: The Cider House Rules
>
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0000507PC/emazing
>
> Another new year...
> Another reason to send an EMAZING Greeting Card!
> 2001 is going to be full of birthdays,
> anniversaries, holidays and everyday occasions.
> Don't miss out--send a FREE and fun EMAZING Greeting
> Card today!
> http://greetings.emazing.com/
>
> It's that time of the year again... make it easy on
> yourself.
> Click here to get TurboTax!
>
http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=32881117&siteid=36901868&bfpage=tur
botax
>
> Need money for college?
> FastWeb is the largest FREE scholarship search on
> the Internet, with accurate, updated information on
> more than 600,000 scholarships, grants, and
> fellowships.
> http://click.emazing.com/ads/fastweb/text2.html
>
> Get satellite television in only one step.
> Click here for more information on FREE satellite
> TV!
>
http://www.commission-junction.com/track/track.dll?AID=1203660&PID=552159&URL=
http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2EskyboxTV%2Ecom
>
> Send Fresh Flowers and Gifts from FTD.COM Today!
> Don't forget, Valentine's Day is Wednesday, February
> 14th. BE A HERO AT FTD.com.
> http://click.emazing.com/ads/ftd/flowers.html
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------
> Another new year...
> Another reason to send an EMAZING Greeting Card!
> 2001 is
> going to be full of birthdays, anniversaries,
> holidays and
> everyday occasions. Don't miss out--send a FREE and
> fun
> EMAZING Greeting Card today!
> http://greetings.emazing.com/
>
---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Quote of the Day
>
> Some cause happiness wherever they go; others,
> whenever they go.
> - Oscar Wilde
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------
>
> EMAZING SUBSCRIBER SERVICES
>
> EMAZING Home
> http://www.emazing.com/
>
> Advice and Living
> http://www.emazing.com/advice/
>
> Brain Candy
> http://www.emazing.com/brain/
>
> Business and Money
> http://www.emazing.com/business/
>
> Comics
> http://www.emazing.com/comics/
>
> Daybreakers
> http://www.emazing.com/daybreakers/
>
> Entertainment
> http://www.emazing.com/entertainment/
>
> Espaol
> http://espanol.emazing.com/
>
> Games
> http://games.emazing.com/
>
> Good Thoughts
> http://www.emazing.com/goodthoughts/
>
> Grapevine
> http://grapevine.emazing.com/
>
> Greetings
> http://greetings.emazing.com/
>
> Health
> http://www.emazing.com/health/
>
> Hobbies
> http://www.emazing.com/hobbies/
>
> Horoscopes
> http://www.emazing.com/horoscopes/
>
> Household Hints
> http://www.emazing.com/household/
>
> Kitchen
> http://www.emazing.com/kitchen/
>
> Music
> http://www.emazing.com/music/
>
> Sports
> http://www.emazing.com/sports/
>
> Style
> http://www.emazing.com/style/
>
> Technology
> http://www.emazing.com/technology/
>
> Travel
> http://www.emazing.com/travel/
>
> Wireless
> http://www.emazing.com/wireless/
>
> Unsubscribe
> http://www.emazing.com/unsub/recipe
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Advertise
> http://www.emazing.com/info/advertise.htm
>
> Archives
> http://www.emazing.com/archives/
>
> Company information
> http://www.emazing.com/info/
>
> Edit Your Profile
> http://www.emazing.com/profile/
>
> Feedback
> Got comments? Suggestions? Complaints?
> Send us an email to feedback@emazing.com
>
> Help
> http://www.emazing.com/info/help.htm
>
> Jobs
> http://www.emazing.com/info/jobs.htm
>
> Privacy Policy
> http://www.emazing.com/info/privacy.htm
>
> Switch To HTML Format
> http://www.emazing.com/switchtohtml.htm
>
> Terms & Conditions
> http://www.emazing.com/info/terms.htm
>
> EMAZING(tm) is a service of EMAZING, INC.
> Copyright 2001. All Rights Reserved.
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------
>
> EMAZING - Whatever you're into, we email it to you.
> FREE!
> http://www.emazing.com
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
http://photos.yahoo.com/