--------------sAAbXVADA=01
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In today's edition of the Daily Update, Robert Maltbie, Jr., CFA, offers
his eight top picks of the year (and two stocks to short), and Marc
Gerstein, director of investment research at Multex Investor, explains the
distinction between normative and empirical investing styles.

Also, Morgan Stanley discusses the strengths and weaknesses of Safeco
(SAFC) in a free report available exclusively to Multex Investor
members like you--all you have to do is register for the firm's free
research trial See details below.

Or, you can link directly to our research page, which features synopses
of broker and free reports, and you can register for the Morgan Stanley
trial by clicking on the Morgan Stanley logo.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=6561&nd=0130

***************************************************************
You are receiving this mail because you have registered for
Multex Investor. To unsubscribe, see bottom of this message.
***************************************************************

======================== Sponsored by =========================

http://www.taxcut.com
Complete with all the new tax law changes, TaxCut software from H&R
Block asks you simple questions, automatically selects & completes the
forms you'll need & then double checks your return. E-file your return
to get your refund faster or print & mail it.

http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;3819285;6829849;h?http://store.taxcut.com/dr/v2/ec_MAIN.entry17c?cid=49360&sp=10007&sid=1478&pn=3&pid=511
==============================================================

Below
--------

- Investment ideas
- Broker and third-party research
- Online advice and chats
- Free and sponsored reports

Investment ideas
-----------------------------------------

1. INVESTMENT IDEAS
Lost illusions
Wall Street's coming-of-age of investment theory

The real world doesn't always behave as expected. Law school graduates
are familiar with the expression which says, "'A' students become judges.
'B' Students become lawyers. 'C' students become rich."

The same could be said of the investment field.

Indeed, people in every walk of life have their own stories about how the
real-world methods of functioning often fail to follow theoretical ideas
about the way things ought to be done.
Click here to read more.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=6477&nd=0130

2. INVESTMENT IDEAS
Top picks for 2002
Winning stocks will be switch-hitters and versatile utility players

By Robert Maltbie, Jr., CFA

Flexibility and style diversification will be key in 2002.  Given that
we expect major market averages to fluctuate by plus or minus
10%, stocks that beat those averages will have to offer a great deal
of weapons. Therefore, we are focusing on 10 stocks that we
believe will thrive across a broad range of styles, including growth,
value, and international. To smash the averages this year, we have
selected growth stocks that have outstanding earnings visibility and
dominant market positions, and value stocks with top, highly
disciplined management teams. We also offer investors a couple of
short ideas where heavy debt loads and technological obsolesce
will be too onerous to allow them to succeed.
Click here to read more.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=6560&nd=0130

WORD FROM OUR SPONSOR
--------------------------

Gold Funds Become Buried Treasure

The performance of gold funds reversed from the past two weeks,
returning a negative 2.39% and breaking a five-week positive trend.
This made them the worst performers of the equity universe.  Read the
latest from Lipper Inc. as they compare the performance of natural
resources to equities.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/ExpertInsights/Article.asp?target=%2Ffunds%2Fexpertinsights%2Farticle&ForumID=49&DocID=6484&DocType=ExpertInsightsCommentary&sid=127&nd=0130

======================== Sponsored by =========================

Get 10 FREE issues of Investor's Business Daily. More than just a newspaper,
Investor's Business Daily is a unique research tool designed to identify
winning stocks with insightful charts and ratings you can't find anywhere
else.This offer carries no obligation and there's nothing to cancel.

http://ibd.infostreet.com/cgi-bin/freeoffer.cgi?source=A362GGL
==============================================================

Broker and third-party reports
-----------------------------------------

1. INVESTORS' CHOICE: 3-DAY FAVORITE
Bear Stearns publishes a 'top ten list' of Internet security predictions for
2002.

After a page of general sector commentary, the firm discusses its list; #3
prediction calls for more sophisticated virus attacks, #6 prediction is that
the biometric hype fizzles, #10 predicts security vendor stocks that will
outperform. (4-page report for purchase - $10)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25966746&nd=0130

2. TODAY'S SPECIAL REPORT
Robert Baird & Co. relates its findings after interviews with 87 firms
utilizing storage solutions.

Baird explains its key takeaways regarding specific vendors following its
survey. The firm discusses customer feedback relating to EMC, CPQ,
IBM, Hitachi, HWP, Sun Micro, DELL, NTAP, BRCD, MDTA, EMLX,
QLGC, VRTS, CA, and LGTO. (65-page report for purchase - $150)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=26051151&nd=0130

3. EDITOR'S PICK: CURRENT RESEARCH FROM THE CUTTING EDGE
CIBC World Markets discusses the impact of Kmart's (KM) bankruptcy
on strip center/mall REITs.

CIBC identifies real estate companies with the largest exposure to the K-
mart situation. The majority of the report analyzes top tenants in 18 strip
malls including KIMCO (KIM) and 9 regional mall operators including
Simon (SPG). (24-page report for purchase - $75)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=26050407&nd=0130

4. THIRD-PARTY REVIEW
Market Edge provides access to its "Second Opinion" service.

Market Edge's service allows investors to input a selected stock and
instantly receive an investment opinion coupled with detailed technical
analysis information including price, volume, and moving average data.
(web-based analysis for purchase - $5)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=21804293&nd=0130

5. WHAT'S HOT?
Morgan Keegan discusses 12 communications stocks in various industry
segments.

The firm offers opinions on Qwest (Q), Level 3 (LVLT), and Worldcom
(WCOM) in long haul, Citizens (CZN), BellSouth (BLS), & Verizon
(VZ) in local access, UNWR, LWIN, & PCS in wireless and Dycom
(DY) and MTZ in periphery services. (5-page report for purchase - $10)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25992861&nd=0130

======================== Sponsored by =========================

There's a time and a place for everything. Usually it's now.
Discover the advantages of Ameritrade with convenient client services,
powerful tools and advanced trading technology.  Trade Smarter.
Open an Ameritrade account today and receive 25 commission-free trades.

http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;3774708;6714130;j?http://www.ameritrade.com/o.cgi?a=mgd&o=rku&p=/html/25.fhtml
==============================================================

Online advice and chats
-----------------------------------------

1. ASK THE ANALYST
Rabbitt Analytics's Paul Rabbitt discusses his continuing optimism on
the economy and stock market.

Explaining that an increase in investor pessimism is good for the market,
Rabbitt elaborates on his bullish position. Why is he so sure things will
get better and what stocks does he like? Feel free to pose him your
questions until Fri., Feb. 1. Ask the analyst.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AskTheAnalystForm.asp?&nd=0130

Find the right stocks to own in this market. Get Rabbitt's Daily Rankings
for Free. Click here
http://www.rabbittanalytics.com/signup_multex3.asp

2.ASK THE EXPERT
Ronald E. Newton with Insurance.com talks about how much auto
insurance you really need.

In reality, there is often a large gap between the insurance you're
required to carry and what you should carry.  Ask Ronald E. Newton of
Insurance.com your questions.  He will take investor questions until
Thurs., Feb. 7.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AskTheExpertForm.asp?&nd=0130

Free and sponsored reports
-----------------------------------------

1. FREE RESEARCH REPORT
Lehman Brothers discusses the increasing amount of commercial aircraft
parkings.

Lehman analyzes aircraft types that airlines are removing from service
due to decreased demand. The firm says even newly delivered planes are
being parked. 9 figures. This 10-page report, which usually sells for $25,
is free to members for the next 72 hours.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=3344623&nd=0130

2. DAILY FREE SPONSOR REPORT
Morgan Stanley sets a $38 price target for "strong buy" rated Safeco
(SAFC).

The firm argues that the "risk reward ration on SAFC has become very
attractive," explains its valuation method and lists key investment
positives and risks in a report available to Multex Investor members like
you. Simply register for the firm's free-research trial to access research
on this (and other) stocks.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=20554331&sid=8&nd=0130

===================================================================
Please send your questions and comments to:
mailto:investor.help@multex.com

If you'd like to learn more about Multex Investor, please visit:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/welcome.asp

If you can't remember your password and/or your user name, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/lostinfo.asp

If you want to update your email address, please click on the url below:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp
===================================================================

To remove yourself from the mailing list for the Daily Update, please
REPLY to THIS email message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line. To remove yourself from all Multex Investor mailings, including
the Daily Update and The Internet Analyst, please respond with the
words NO EMAIL in the subject line.

You may also unsubscribe on the account update page at:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp

===================================================================
Please email advertising inquiries to us at:
mailto:advertise@multex.com.

Be sure to check out our other newsletters, The Internet Analyst
and The Telecomm Analyst by Multex.com. The newsletters will
inform, educate, and entertain you with usable investment data,
ideas, experts, and info about the Internet and telecommunications
sectors. To see this week's issue,
click here:
http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/ or
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/

--------------sAAbXVADA=01
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
            "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">

	<title>MIN Daily News Update</title>

		Multex Investor Daily Update

In today’s edition of the Daily Update, Robert Maltbie, Jr., CFA, offers his eight top picks of the year (and two stocks to short), and Marc Gerstein, director of investment research at Multex Investor, explains the distinction between normative and empirical investing styles.

Also, Morgan Stanley discusses the strengths and weaknesses of Safeco (SAFC) in a free report available exclusively to Multex Investor members like you—all you have to do is register for the firm's free research trial. See details below.

Or, you can link directly to our research page, which features synopses
of broker and free reports, and you can register for the Morgan Stanley trial by clicking on the Morgan Stanley logo.

Finally, as you may have noticed, you are receiving today's newsletter in HTML format, a method we hope will enable us to give you a better service. Please let us know what you think. Email us at investor.feedback@multex.com

				Special Message

			http://www.taxcut.com

			Complete with all the new tax law changes, TaxCut software from H&R
			Block asks you simple questions, automatically selects & completes the
			forms you'll need & then double checks your return. E-file your return
			to get your refund faster or print & mail it.
			Click here for details.

In this issue:

Investment Ideas:

	Lost illusions: Wall Street’s coming-of-age of investment theory

	Top picks for 2002: Winning stocks will be switch-hitters and versatile utility players

Featured Reports:

	Investor’s Choice: Bear Stearns publishes Internet security predictions for
2002

	Today’s Special Report: Robert Baird & Co. discuss storage solutions

	Editor’s Pick: CIBC World Markets discusses Kmart’s bankruptcy and strip center/mall REITs

	Third Party Review: Market Edge provides access to its “Second Opinion” service

	What’s Hot: Morgan Keegan on 12 communications stocks

Investment Advice:

	Ask the Analyst / Ask the Expert

		Lost illusions: Wall Street's coming-of-age of investment theory

		By Marc Gerstein, Director of Research

The real world doesn't always behave as expected. Law school graduates
are familiar with the expression which says, "'A' students become judges.
'B' Students become lawyers. 'C' students become rich."

The same could be said of the investment field.

Indeed, people in every walk of life have their own stories about how the
real-world methods of functioning often fail to follow theoretical ideas
about the way things ought to be done.
Click here to read more.

		Top picks for 2002: Winning stocks will be switch-hitters and versatile utility players

		By Robert Maltbie, Jr., CFA

Flexibility and style diversification will be key in 2002.  Given that
we expect major market averages to fluctuate by plus or minus
10%, stocks that beat those averages will have to offer a great deal
of weapons. Therefore, we are focusing on 10 stocks that we
believe will thrive across a broad range of styles, including growth,
value, and international. To smash the averages this year, we have
selected growth stocks that have outstanding earnings visibility and
dominant market positions, and value stocks with top, highly
disciplined management teams. We also offer investors a couple of
short ideas where heavy debt loads and technological obsolesce
will be too onerous to allow them to succeed.
Click here to read more.

				Special Message

Get 10 FREE issues of Investor's Business Daily. More than just a newspaper,
Investor's Business Daily is a unique research tool designed to identify
winning stocks with insightful charts and ratings you can't find anywhere
else. This offer carries no obligation and there's nothing to cancel. Click here for details.

		Investors’ Choice: 3-day Favorite

		Bear Stearns publishes a ‘top ten list’ of Internet security predictions for 2002.

After a page of general sector commentary, the firm discusses its list; #3
		prediction calls for more sophisticated virus attacks, #6 prediction is that
		the biometric hype fizzles, #10 predicts security vendor stocks that will
		outperform.

		(4-page report for purchase - $10)

		Todays’ Special Report

		Robert Baird & Co. relates its findings after interviews with 87 firms utilizing storage solutions.

Baird explains its key takeaways regarding specific vendors following its
survey. The firm discusses customer feedback relating to EMC, CPQ,
IBM, Hitachi, HWP, Sun Micro, DELL, NTAP, BRCD, MDTA, EMLX,
QLGC, VRTS, CA, and LGTO. (65-page report for purchase - $150)

		Editor’s Pick: Current Research from the Cutting Edge

		CIBC World Markets discusses the impact of Kmart’s (KM) bankruptcy
on strip center/mall REITs.

CIBC identifies real estate companies with the largest exposure to the K-
mart situation. The majority of the report analyzes top tenants in 18 strip
malls including KIMCO (KIM) and 9 regional mall operators including
Simon (SPG). (24-page report for purchase - $75)

		Third Party Review

		Market Edge provides access to its “Second Opinion” service.

Market Edge's service allows investors to input a selected stock and
instantly receive an investment opinion coupled with detailed technical
analysis information including price, volume, and moving average data.
(web-based analysis for purchase - $5)

		What’s Hot?

		Morgan Keegan discusses 12 communications stocks in various industry
segments.

The firm offers opinions on Qwest (Q), Level 3 (LVLT), and Worldcom
(WCOM) in long haul, Citizens (CZN), BellSouth (BLS), & Verizon
(VZ) in local access, UNWR, LWIN, & PCS in wireless and Dycom
(DY) and MTZ in periphery services. (5-page report for purchase - $10)

				Special Message

				There's a time and a place for everything. Usually it's now.
Discover the advantages of Ameritrade with convenient client services,
powerful tools and advanced trading technology.  Trade Smarter.
Open an Ameritrade® account today and receive 25 commission-free trades. Click here for details.

		Ask the Analyst

		Rabbitt Analytics’s Paul Rabbitt discusses his continuing optimism on
the economy and stock market.

Explaining that an increase in investor pessimism is good for the market,
Rabbitt elaborates on his bullish position. Why is he so sure things will
get better and what stocks does he like? Feel free to pose him your
questions until Fri., Feb. 1. Ask the analyst.

Find the right stocks to own in this market. Get Rabbitt's Daily Rankings
for Free. Click here.

		Ask the Expert

		Ronald E. Newton with Insurance.com talks about how much auto
insurance you really need.

		In reality, there is often a large gap between the insurance you're
required to carry and what you should carry.  Ask Ronald E. Newton of
Insurance.com your questions.  He will take investor questions until
Thurs., Feb. 7.  Ask the expert.

		<form name="formTickerSearch" action="http://www.multexinvestor.com/cs_search.asp" method="post" target="_blank">

			Ticker Search

			<input type="hidden" name="target" value="/home/home/home" /> <input type="hidden" name="nss" value="www" />
			<input type="hidden" name="SecurityDomicile" value="USA" />
			<input type="text" id="Ticker" size="5" name="Ticker" value="" style="font: 10px verdana,geneva,sans-serif; color: #000000;" />
			<select name=".reporttype" onChange="jumpPage(this.form.newLocation)" style="font: 10px verdana,geneva,sans-serif; color: #000000;">
               <option value="quotes" selected="selected" >Quote</option>
               <option value="research" >Research</option>
            </select>

			<input type="submit" value="Get Info" name="submit" style="cursor: hand; font: bold 12px verdana,geneva,sans-serif; color: #000000;" title="Click here to search for Ticker Information"/>

			Stocks

			Funds

			Personal Finance

			Live Events

		</form>

		Sponsored Report

		Morgan Stanley sets a $38 price target for "strong buy" rated Safeco
(SAFC).

		The firm argues that the "risk reward ration on SAFC has become very
attractive," explains its valuation method and lists key investment
positives and risks in a report available to Multex Investor members like
you. Simply register for the firm's free-research trial to access research
on this (and other) stocks.

		Free Report

		Lehman Brothers discusses the increasing amount of commercial aircraft
parkings.

Lehman analyzes aircraft types that airlines are removing from service
due to decreased demand. The firm says even newly delivered planes are
being parked. 9 figures. This 10-page report, which usually sells for $25,
is free to members for the next 72 hours.

				Sponsored By

				Gold Funds Become Buried Treasure

				The performance of gold funds reversed from the past two weeks,
returning a negative 2.39% and breaking a five-week positive trend.
This made them the worst performers of the equity universe.  Read the
latest from Lipper Inc. as they compare the performance of natural
resources to equities. Click here.

		Unsubscribe
		Questions?
		Lost Password?
		Account Information

		© 2002 Multex.com, Inc. - All rights reserved.


Dec 19 marks for small volume
 - Book2.xls


Lee,

I would like to deliver as much of Midcon's gas as possible to Mobil
(25,000-30,000) for February.  When the work is going on, we can move that
around.  Also, we have 10,000 baseload on Centana we need to deliver to the
plant.

D

From: Lee L Papayoti on 01/23/2001 02:22 PM
To: Pat Flavin/GCO/Enron@ENRON, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D
Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Texoma - Beaumont interconnect

Mobil says the low point of their takes will be during February will be from
Feb 1 to 14.  So any day in that time period would be a good time for HPL to
do the required maintenance at the Texoma-Beaumont system interconnect.

We need to define our game plan:
- what day to do the work
- how much gas HPL will deliver through our own meter
- how we use Centana to deliver the rest of the HPL volumes
- if we had planned in Feb to baseload some of our MidCon obligation at Mobil
as we have done in Dec and Jan, then we will need to do something different
whenever we do the maintenance

James - we are scheduled to meet with Mobil in Beaumont at 10.30am Thursday
Feb 1, to go over the game plan with them.

Pat - do you want anyone from HMS to attend?

Thanks

Lee


I've expanded the counterparty list to all those that typically do more than 50 trades per day.  Additionally, liquid power products have been added in.  One final note:  on the previous spreadsheet, the position under a particular column indicated the starting position for that day rather than the ending position for that day.  In this version, each number represents the end-of-day position for the given date.  Effectively, all the numbers slide over 1 column.

--jay


The following meters were shut-in for approximately 12 Hours beginning
approximately 3:00 AM on Sunday, Feburary 6 due to high pressure on the Tom
O'Connor system.

0989703 Sarco Creek
0984654 Dennis O'Connor
0989708 C E Swyka
0989751 Allison
0984273 Copano #1
0984273 Copano #2
0984126 Copano #3
0984136 Lake Pasture
0986511 Huff Fld Common Point #4
0989709 O'Connor BP Central Point

If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 36449.

Thanks
Gary


George:

I will send it by e-mail.  Take care.   Mark


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Nancy Gardiner/Indonesian Presentation

Date:		8/22/2000
Time:		3:30 PM - 5:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Go for it!

George Robinson
04/27/99 04:14 PM

To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Butch Russell/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: NNG Gomez Water Disposal

I began discussions regarding this issue with Sonny, an employee of Cliffwood
Oil & Gas, operator of the Ft. Stockton Unit Water Station. This is the
outfit that was taking our recovered groundwater. Sonny discussed this with
Cliffwoods' reservoir engineers in Houston and they decided they did not want
to accept this water regardless of permit status due to their concern that
the relatively fresh water may cause calcium carbonate to precipitate in the
disposal well perforations and plug up their well.

Lee Cisneros of 4C Construction, the outfit hauling the recovered water, put
me in touch with Kenneth McIntyre of Stockton Water Inc. Kenneth informed me
that they would accept the water if permit condition would allow it. Kenneth
said they would dispose of the water in one of two wells, their University
165 or RS Pershing Well#1.

This afternoon I discussed the issue of disposal of recovered water with
Doris at the TRC District 8 office. Doris looked up the permit for these two
wells and informed me that they were permitted for produced water only. After
further discussion of the situation she transferred my call Mark Henkhaus,
District 8 Director. Mark said that normally this waste stream would go to an
"oil and gas waste" disposal facility as you had pointed out in our meeting
last week, but suggested an alternative. Mark suggested that I obtain a
letter of no objection from the operator of the SWD disposal well and
transmit the letter with a request for approval from his office to dispose of
the recovered water in the SWD disposal well for a period not to exceed 12
months. He said he will issue an approval for such a request.

I think this will be the most cost effective manner to manage recovered water
over the next few months, particularly if recovery operations continue to
proceed as favorably as they have to date and we can cease active remediation
activities toward the latter part of this year. If you concur, I will obtain
the letter from the disposal well operator and submit the request to the TRC.

Thanks, George


Herman,

please see attached for your comments and approval.  Does this fit the bill?


Hello, I just spoke with Joe Hunter.  His group is supposed to call you and
ask if you want to ADP the deal.  Then they notify the brokers to let them
know.    Joe Hunter's group will handle this part of the process in the
future.  In the future when these trades are entered into Enpower we would
like for you all to put a comment in the deal saying that it is a deal that
when physical off of the NYMEX.  We do not want to confirm these
transactions.  We sent a confirmation letter on this deal and that is what
caused all of the confusion.   Regardless if the deal has been ADP'd or not
we do not want to confirm these transactions since they were originally done
on the NYMEX.  So please let everyone know to put a note in the deal so we
won't confirm them and hopefully we won't have all of this confusion again in
the future.

Thanks for you help!

Let me know if you need me to do anything else.
Melissa

   Kate Symes                12/05/2000 12:33 PM

To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Futures Deal w/ Sempra

I've spoken with Tim Cannon at Sempra, who said that what he needed was for
our broker and his broker to talk to each other and agree that this deal has
gone physical and is no longer on NYMEX. Then I talked to Matt Motley, who
talked to his broker, who will now talk to Sempra's broker and hopefully
solve this once and for all.

You're right though. There's no need for it to be this difficult, especially
when we do it every month. I think it would be really helpful if we could get
a hold of Dave Dupre to find out how this was handled before. If we can't, I
guess we'll just have to determine who will take responsibility for making
sure these deals are recognized as physical by both parties. I would be happy
to do that each month when we exercise our futures options, but I want
everyone involved to be aware of the procedure.

Thanks a lot for helping on this. Please let me know if you find out anymore.

Thanks,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
12/05/2000 06:45 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Futures Deal w/ Sempra

Hello, I left a message for David Dupre and he has not called me back.  If
you want to have Matt call Tim Cannon at Sempra that would be fine.  His
phone number is (203) 355-5190.  I don't know why this has been so
difficult.  If I hear from David I will let you know.  I want to know how he
handled these deals in the past.

Thanks,
Melissa
(713) 853-1886

   Kate Symes                12/04/2000 06:31 PM

To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Futures Deal w/ Sempra

Just curious - did you ever catch up with Larry Joe Hunter regarding the Long
Term Southwest desk's futures deal with Sempra? I'm wondering if I should
grab Matt Motley before he goes home today to let him know he needs to get a
hold of Tim Cannon about the ADT. Let me know when and if you talk to him.

Thanks,
Kate


Chris:  I left voice mails for both Tracy Ngo and Tanya Rohauer about
Delano.  I've had no response.  SS


David,

FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
11:31 AM ---------------------------

vkamins@enron.com@ms1.lga2.nytimes.com on 03/19/2001 09:35:38 AM
Please respond to vkamins@enron.com
Sent by: articles-email@ms1.lga2.nytimes.com
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: NYTimes.com Article: Companies Turn to Grades, and Employees Go to
Court

This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by vkamins@enron.com.

Jeff,

FYI,

Vince

/-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\

Let NYTimes.com Come to You

Sign up for one of our weekly e-mails
and the news will come directly to you.
YOUR MONEY brings you a wealth of analysis
and information about personal investing.
CIRCUITS plugs you into the latest on
personal technology. TRAVEL DISPATCH offers
you a jump on special travel deals and news.

http://email.nytimes.com/email/email.jsp?eta5

\----------------------------------------------------------/

Companies Turn to Grades, and Employees Go to Court

By REED ABELSON

An increasingly popular technique for evaluating employees is
prompting lawsuits charging discrimination at three big companies.

 At issue is the ranking of managers, professionals and sometimes
lower-level employees from best to worst, or grading them on a bell
curve, and then using that ranking to help determine pay and
sometimes whether to fire someone.

 In their suits, all filed over the last year or so, employees at
Microsoft, Ford Motor and Conoco say the rating systems are unfair
because they favor some groups of employees over others: white
males over blacks and women, younger managers over older ones and
foreign citizens over Americans.

 A growing number of companies are turning to grading systems, also
known as forced rankings or distributions, as a way of making sure
managers evaluate employees honestly and make clearer distinctions
among them. At companies that do not compare employees with one
another this way, nearly every employee can come away feeling above
average, like the children of Lake Wobegon. But under the grading
system, managers are forced to identify some people as low
performers.

 At General Electric, for example, supervisors identify the top 20
percent and bottom 10 percent of their managerial and professional
employees every year. The bottom 10 percent are not likely to stay.

 As John F. Welch Jr., General Electric's chief executive, wrote
last month to shareholders, "A company that bets its future on its
people must remove that lower 10 percent, and keep removing it
every year * always raising the bar of performance and increasing
the quality of its leadership."

 Ranking or grading employees is also common at technology
companies like Cisco Systems and Hewlett- Packard. But recently the
concept has been catching on more broadly, according to management
consultants. One reason is that as the economy slows, companies
often lay off employees. Cisco, for example, announced earlier this
month that it would let go as many as 5,000 workers * and would use
grading as one way to identify people to lay off.

 "Companies are playing their version of `Survivor,' " said David
Thomas, a professor at the Harvard Business School.

 Another reason is that some companies are eager to copy Mr. Welch,
long viewed as one of the most successful managers in America.

 Defenders of these systems say anyone who gets a low grade is
likely to view the process as unfair. " `A' students love grades;
`F' students hate grades," said John Sullivan, a human resources
professor at San Francisco State University.

 But the techniques, which some employees label with terms like
"rank and yank," have come under sharp criticism. While they appear
to offer an objective way to judge employees, they can be
vulnerable to bias, Mr. Thomas said. Managers may stereotype
employees when evaluating them on vague criteria like career
potential * deciding that older workers, for example, may have a
harder time keeping up with new technology.

 In some cases managers can view these systems "as a tool to be
used to weed out the ones you don't want," said Thomas S. McLeod, a
lawyer in Canton, Mich., who represents employees suing Ford in
another case.

 Critics of the system also argue that companies should not apply a
bell curve, in which a small number of employees get the highest
and lowest rankings and a much larger number are grouped in the
middle. The bell curve model assumes a normal distribution among a
very large group of random individuals, not small groups.

 What is more, across a company, people who belong to a
particularly talented unit will suffer if a certain number of them
must be given poorer grades than they would get in another unit.

 "You end up with dysfunctional results," said Edward E. Lawler
III, a business professor at the University of Southern California.

 Some lawsuits contend that Microsoft's grading systems are
discriminatory. One, filed last October, seeks class-action status
on behalf of blacks and women. The suit states that the rating
system "permits managers, who are predominantly white males, to
rate employees based upon their own biases rather than based upon
merit."

 According to the lawsuit, employees are rated on a five-point
scale, with only a certain percentage permitted to receive each
score. Employees doing the same job in the same unit are also given
a "stack ranking," from most to least valuable. Managers decide
those rankings largely using what are called "lifeboat
discussions," where they choose which employees they would want
with them if stuck in a lifeboat. Managers had no other clear
criteria, according to Christine Webber, a lawyer at Cohen,
Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll who is representing the employees.

 Grading is highly subjective at Microsoft, according to Peter M.
Browne, a former executive who is also suing the company, charging
discrimination. Mr. Browne, who is black, said managers were forced
to use a curve in evaluating even small groups. He said he had to
rate a group of five on a curve, for example, in deciding which
ones would not receive stock options.

 "You weren't told anything * just meet the curve," Mr. Browne
said.

 He says managers ended up favoring people with whom they
socialized. "People gravitate to people who are like them, and the
system just forces that," he said.

 Microsoft defends its system as fair and helpful. "We want to give
the highest compensation to the very top performers," said Deborah
Willingham, senior vice president for human resources, adding that
the system included checks and balances to ensure fair treatment.
Employees can appeal their ratings, for example, and are largely
responsible for developing the criteria by which they are
evaluated.

 Ms. Willingham also said the company did not ask its managers to
give a fixed percentage of their employees any given score. "We
don't force that curve to look any certain way," she said.

 Microsoft has no formal "stack rank" policy, she said. And when
managers do have lifeboat discussions, they are a tool to consider
which employees they would want to keep if they were starting
again.

 While the company would not comment on the lawsuits, Microsoft
"expressly prohibits discrimination," Ms. Willingham said.

 Similar criticisms emerged in a lawsuit brought last month against
Ford. It argues that the company's new grading system discriminates
against older workers. The company, which adopted what it calls its
performance management process a year ago, gives its 18,000
managers A, B or C grades. Last year, the company awarded 10
percent an A, 80 percent a B and 10 percent a C.

 Ford also faces a second lawsuit asserting that it unfairly
discriminated against older white males in its grading.It would not
comment on the litigation but defended its use of grades. "We
believe the system is fair and nondiscriminatory," a company
spokeswoman said. "We are in a very competitive industry, and we
need all of our employees to be the best they can be."

 At Conoco, employees contend that the company discriminated
against United States citizens and older workers when it laid off a
dozen geophysicists and other scientists in 1999 based on a ranking
from one to four, according to a lawsuit filed last year. The
majority of those let go were Americans, according to the suit, as
opposed to British, Norwegian and Canadian professionals.

 "The rating system was selectively enforced, and there were
instances of manipulation," said John Zavitsanos, the lawyer
representing the workers. Even though some were given higher
ratings on earlier rankings, they were eventually given the lowest
possible rating of four.

 Conoco, based in Houston, has extensive operations in the North
Sea, and many of the senior managers at the division in question
are British, according to Mr. Zavitsanos.

 While Conoco said it could not comment on the litigation, it said
its evaluations were based on several factors, including
performance, skills and expertise. The company said ratings often
changed as more information was collected and people were evaluated
in larger groups. Conoco company also denied that decisions were
based on anything other than individual capabilities.

 Companies "do need something in making pay decisions, downsizing
decisions," said Jim Kochanski, a consultant with Nextera
Enterprises. The problem is that companies may not take enough care
in deciding how people should be ranked. "They can get it very
wrong," he said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/19/business/19GRAD.html?ex=986016138&ei=1&en=e2
02a0228246c717

/-----------------------------------------------------------------\

Visit NYTimes.com for complete access to the
most authoritative news coverage on the Web,
updated throughout the day.

Become a member today! It's free!

http://www.nytimes.com?eta

\-----------------------------------------------------------------/

HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact Alyson
Racer at alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@nytimes.com.

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company


more from amanda
m
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000
11:15 AM ---------------------------
From: Amanda K Martin@AZURIX on 12/18/2000 02:56 PM
Sent by: Susan Kalich@AZURIX
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Resumes - Thierry Noel & Tameeza Asaria

Attached resumes are as per our talks and my voice mail.  Thanks -

 Amanda/sak


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">

<title>Xerox - Free Color Printer</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

January 23, 2002

The following message was sent to you as an opt-in subscriber to Sweepsclub.com. We will continue to bring you valuable offers on the products and services that interest you most. If you wish to unsubscribe please copy and paste the following link into your web browser http://www.sweepsclub.com/r/?i=1069712217&m=2555719&a=ea%3ddon.baughman@enron.com or click here.

If any questions or comments email us at MailService@sweepsclub.com
@sweepsclub.com.


Effective today (8/16), authority to sign manual wires & same day payments
has been transferred from Tom Myers to Georgeanne Hodges.  As always, Wes
Colwell will also continue to have signing authority.  Please continue to
make every attempt to minimize these transactions.

Thanks,

Tom


Today's poll from the Daily Oklahoman:

What will Mack Brown's excuse for a brutal loss to OU be this year?
 <<...OLE_Obj...>> Simms-Applewhite slap fight before game

 <<...OLE_Obj...>> Defensive coordinator spent too much time buying
umbrellas for players

 <<...OLE_Obj...>> Corso picked us

 <<...OLE_Obj...>> Officials immune to threats from 'Big Tex'

 <<...OLE_Obj...>> No excuse: We lost to the better team


I'm so stoked you're going to Buena Vista Social Club. I can't believe you
are such a rotten "bik" that you didn't invite me. What's up with that?

My advice on the Outward Bound thing is to hold off. Not for selfish,
wine-swilling reasons, of course; but because I know how tiring it gets to be
living out of a suitcase with no dinero for a period of time. I have to say
that sticking around Portland for the last six months has given me a renewed
sense of mental health. Granted, I'm not totally sane yet, but at least I can
imagine what it would be like. If you came home and turned right around and
went to Colorado, you'd feel unprepared and maybe a little overwhelmed. Think
carefully about how much Outward Bound would pay you in comparison with how
much money you actually need to get by. Then add $500/month to that figure,
and you'll be about right. It always sounds easier than the reality - I'm
only speaking from Maui experience here.

If you want to do a whirlwind Denver thing and have a great, rustic, totally
broke time, then totally go for it. But if you feel like you're getting to
the end of your rope with scraping by and feeling unsettled - which it kind
of sounds like you are - then hang in P-town for awhile. Like I said, I'd
feel SOOOO much better about taking off on my next adventure NOW than I would
have even a couple months ago. And it's only been six months since I got back
- that's not really too long to wait. In the meantime, you don't have to live
with mom. The Malachowsky's room will be open, although for all the help I've
given them I wouldn't be surprised if they don't want a Symes there anymore.
Then there's always my future apartment. I'm thinkin' downtown for sure.

Anyway, we'll talk more about it in Mexico. Don't stress - whatever you're
meant to do, you'll end up doing whether you like it or not.

Love,
Kate


Shelley, first of all, I apologize for not responding in a timely manner.  I should have responded that we were waiting to gather additional comments, if any, and make one global response.  mea culpa.
Second, I received an email from Mike Mcgowan just a few moments ago wherein he is proposing a response to your request.  By copy of this memo, you can anticipate that Mike will forward a response shortly.
Again, sorry for the inconvenience.


I haven't seen this yet.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thome, Stephen
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Calger, Christopher F.; Schneider, Chip; Tweed, Sheila; Kitchen, Louise; Clark, Morris
Cc:	Thomas, Jake
Subject:	ABB Dash

The previous Enron America's DASH has been replaced with the one attached below.

Chris, if you will sign and fax me the signature page, I will route the document.

 << File: ABB GT11N1 dash.doc >>

Steve


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

June 1, 2001 5:00pm through June 4, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ECS to ECN Network Interconnection, June 9th 2001

This is a notification that the Enron Corp. I/T Networks team will be connecting the new building network infrastructure located in Enron Center South (ECS) to the existing Enron Center North (ECN) backbone network.  While this activity is not expected to produce a disruption to network services, this notice is designed to alert the organization to our activities.  No network hardware or systems are anticipated to be shutdown.  The actual physical interconnection of the networks will be performed in the EB 34th floor Data Center.

Interconnection activities are scheduled to occur the evening of June 9th 2001 starting from 7:00 p.m.(CT) and completing around 11:00 p.m. (CT). Application testing activities will begin at 11:00 p.m. (CT) once all network testing has completed.

If you have any further questions, please contact Pete Castrejana at 713-410-0642 for more information.

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  ENS
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  11:45:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at    9:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at     9:45:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  5:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  5:45:00 AM London
Outage:  Enable routing on new router ecn-34-cor-ccr1
Environments Impacted:  ENS
Purpose: This router will be used to connect to the new building
Backout: remove routing on the router.
Contact(s): 	Scott Shishido    713-853-9780

Impact:  AEP
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  8:30:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  6:30:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  2:30:00 AM London
Outage:  Shutting off the internal link to 1201 Louisiana
Environments Impacted:  AEP
Purpose: Company occupying that space has been sold.
Backout: None
Contact(s): 	Garhett Clark         713-345-9953
                        Robert Humlicek   713-853-6366   713-406-8293

Impact:  ENS/GCO
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001    thru Wed 7/4/2001
Outage:  HPL migration to AEP
Environments Impacted:  GCO
Purpose: Sites sold
Backout: None
Contact(s): 	Garhett Clark         713-345-9953
		Robert Humlicek   713-853-6366   713-406-8293

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:
Impact:  Internet
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  10:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  10:45:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at    8:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at     8:45:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  4:30:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  4:45:00 AM London
Outage:  Reboot Enron.com edge routers
Environments Impacted:  Internet
Purpose: Regular reboot to prevent such problems as memory corruption. Intermettent disruption to last about five minutes.
Backout:
Contact(s): 	John Shupak          713-853-7943
		Bryan Aubuchon    713-345-8446

MESSAGING:
Impact:  Corp Notes
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at 11:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  cNotes Server Reboots
Environments Impacted:  All users on any of the mailservers listed below
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: Make sure server comes up.
Contact(s): 	Trey Rhodes  (713) 345-7792

Impact:  EI
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at 11:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  EI Notes Server Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  EI Local/Domestic/Foreign Sites
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: N/A
Contact(s): 	David Ricafrente    713-646-7741

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


Rhett:
Thanks for your response.  I have asked Deutsche Bank for the name of their
tax counsel in case they don't agree with our position.  I'll keep you posted.
Carol

	Rhett Jackson
	05/23/2000 06:58 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ISDA Tax Issue

Carol:

I'd rather not change our standard agreement.  Specifically, the current
definition of "Indemnifiable Tax" covers both present and future tax (as
evidenced in the definition "Tax") and thus, necessarily, should protect the
counterparty in the case of a "Change in Tax Law."  Moreover, Deutsche Bank's
amendment to "Indemnifiable Tax" potentially subjects us to risk that I don't
feel is in our best interest to assume because we don't have any control over
the counterparty's activities.  Bottom line - I would reject the amendment.

Please let me know if you would like me to speak to their tax counsel.

Rhett Jackson
EB 4680
713/853-4718

   Carol St Clair                05/23/2000 10:17 AM

To: Rhett Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ISDA Tax Issue

Rhett:
You may recall a few weeks ago I asked you about some language that one of
our counterparties wanted as an amendment to the term "Indemnifiable Tax".
Another counterparty, Deutsche Bank, has requested the following which I
think is very similar to what we were looking at before:

Notwithstanding the foregoing, "IndemnifiableTax" also means any Tax imposed
by reasons of a Change in Tax Law by a government or taxing authority of a
Relevant Jurisdiction of the payer, unless the payee is incorporated,
organized, managed and controlled or considered to have its seat in such
jurisdiction, or is acting for purposes of this Agreement through a branch or
office located in such jurisdiction.

In the ISDA Users' guide, they explain that the effect of this language is to
eliminate the payee's risk of bearing new taxes imposed by the payer's
jurisdiction even if the payee's activities in such jurisdiction is the basis
for such taxes. (except if the circumstances in the definition occur).    It
thus results in the payer having to gross up for such taxes.

Do you think that we can or should accept this?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)


Um no sir
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Alan,

My sincerest apologies, please keep me posted on what happens.  I'd like to buy you lunch sometime soon and talk about how we can avoid these situations in the future.  I think if we get master documents in place and convey to you a better understanding of our corporate structure, you'll find Enron easy to deal with, flexible, responsive, and competitive.  I'll call you soon in hopes we can get together.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Meyer [mailto:ameyer@wii.com]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:20 AM
To: Fuller, Dave
Subject: RE: Williamette Enovative

Dave,

Thanks.  Roger called and I am now working with Annette now to try to get
things wrapped up.

Alan Meyer
Willamette Industries, Inc.
Voice:	503-412-2009
Fax:	503-721-8624
E-mail:	AMeyer@wii.com <mailto:AMeyer@wii.com>

		-----Original Message-----
		From:	Fuller, Dave [mailto:Dave.Fuller@enron.com]
		Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 8:38 AM
		To:	Alan Meyer
		Subject:	RE: Williamette Enovative

		Alan,

		I tracked down Roger and insisted he get in touch with you
AT ONCE.
		Please let me know if he does not.

		Dave

		-----Original Message-----
		From: Alan Meyer [mailto:ameyer@wii.com]
		Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:32 AM
		To: Reynolds, Roger
		Cc: Fuller, Dave
		Subject: RE: Williamette Enovative
		Importance: High

		Roger,

		I hope you're reading your E-mail, because I can't get to
you by phone.

		Our attorney is checking the contract T&Cs, but I noticed
that none of
		the
		corrected company information I provided the last time
around is
		included.
		The name of our company is incorrect.  You have Ralph Mill's
name with
		my
		address, phone number, and my (incorrect) fax number. The
facility name
		is
		incorrect and the street name is misspelled.  All of this
was correct on
		the
		last copy I sent you.  Plus, there is no customer contact
information on
		the
		second page.

		Since the file is protected, I can't even correct this.

		How are we going to get this fixed in the next 2 hours?

		Alan Meyer
		Corporate Energy Manager
		Willamette Industries, Inc.
		Voice:	503-412-2009
		Fax:	503-721-8624
		E-mail:	AMeyer@wii.com <mailto:AMeyer@wii.com>

				-----Original Message-----
				From:	Reynolds, Roger
		[mailto:Roger.Reynolds@enron.com]
				Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:42 AM
				To:	ameyer@wii.com
				Subject:	FW: Williamette Enovative

				 << File: Williamette.doc >>

				>  -----Original Message-----
				> From: 	Reynolds, Roger
				> Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:38 PM
				> To:	'rnitura@ktminc.com';
',ameyer@wii.com'
				> Cc:	Willis, Annette
				> Subject:	FW: Williamette Enovative
				>
				>
				> Please find enclosed the revised contract;
If Alan
		could
		fax me back
				> the last page of the signed contract I
will forward to
		legal, who will
				> then sign the pipeline agreement;
				>
				> Thanks for your help..
				>
				> Roger
				>  -----Original Message-----
				> From: 	Dietrich, Sarah
				> Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:58 AM
				> To:	Reynolds, Roger
				> Cc:	Hillegonds, Jennifer
				> Subject:	Williamette Enovative
				>
				> Here is the Williamette Enovative.  There
are some
		blanks
		that still
				> need to be filled in as you will see.
				>
				> See section 1.2 for the Balancing
Language.
				> We have revised the Default section to
give 5 extra
		days
		from our
				> notice to them before they are in default
for late
		payments
				> We have also revised the Change in law
provision to
		permit
		them to
				> either pay the extra $ or the agreement
will be
		terminated.
				>
				> The multiple monthly pricing has been
listed as you
		will
		see and the
				> Delivery Point defined as the Meter.
				>
				> The agreement also states under quantity
that is a
		full
		requirements
				> agreement.
				>
				> I think that covers it.  If I forgot to
mention
		anything
		give me or
				> Jennifer a call to see how we handled it.
				>
				> Sarah
				>
				>  <<Williamette.doc>>
				>

**********************************************************************
				This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp.
and/or its
		relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and
privileged material
		for
		the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
		distribution or
		disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
the intended
		recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
please contact
		the
		sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
		enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
		and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
attachments
		hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance)
and do not
		create
		or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or
		any
		of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and
		may
		not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or
		otherwise. Thank you.

**********************************************************************


That flight time is fine.  A couple of other things:  I need to meet with
McKinsey while I'm in town on Monday.  Please set up with Suzanne Nimocks'
office.  Also, my return should be first thing Tuesday morning (I think we
had discussed Monday night originally).  Just get me on the first available
flight to Roswell.

Also, I didn't mean to put you in  a difficult spot with Melissa.  I had
tried getting hold of her last night but only got the answering machine.
Don't worry about tellling her my travel schedule.  If I haven't told her
first, I'll deal with the consequences (I've logged "couch time" before plus
I'm usually pretty good about keeping her up to date).
Thanks

	Maureen McVicker
	11/16/2000 02:44 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FLIGHT ROSWELL TO HOUSTON

It turns out that the co. plane flight from Roswell to Houston only takes a
little over an hour.

We currently have it scheduled for:

  Depart  Roswell at 7:00 p.m (MST) on Sunday 11/19/00

  Arrive Houston at 9:17 p.m. (CST)

Your HR PRC starts at 7:30 a.m. on Monday 11/20/00.

Just FYI - the co. plane will land in Roswell at 4:05 p.m. (MST) and wait for
you.

Is the departure time at 7:00 pm ok with you?
Do you want to leave a little later since the flight doesn't take very long?


Michael,

Attached for your review and comment is the updated draft incorporating
certain copyright and contractual relationship language.  The new sections
that were added are Section 1(c) and Section 4.  If you have any questions or
comments please give me a call.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886

	Michael Eiben
	12/04/2000 04:11 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Legal And Privacy Information.htm

we are trying to finalize this section.  could you guys give us your input?

thanks,    mve
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 04:08
PM ---------------------------

meiben@ect.enron.com on 11/30/2000 04:21:03 PM
Please respond to meiben@ect.enron.com
To: michael.eiben@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Legal And Privacy Information.htm

LEGAL AND PRIVACY INFORMATION

1. All information and material including images, text and audio on this
website is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its subsidiaries (and/or its or
its subsidiaries' licensors) (collectively "Enron") and is subject to
copyright.Trading Innovation, Endless possibilities, Enron.com, Enron, Enron
& design, Enron Corp., Enron Corp. & design, Enron with fanciful E, Enron
with fanciful E (color), are all trademarks owned by Enron Corp. All other
trade marks on this website are the property of their respective owners. You
are entitled to view, copy and print any documents from this website but only
for your own internal business purposes. Any sale, transmission or
redistribution of this website or its content, and any copying, modification
or other use of this website or its content for any purposes other than your
own internal business purposes, are strictly prohibited.
2. This website is provided solely for information purposes and, with the
exception of this "Legal and Privacy" statement, is not intended to, and
shall not, constitute any offer or acceptance with respect to any
transactions or other matters. This website shall not create any legal
relationship between you and Enron, unless you have signed a Password
Application, in which case the Online User Agreement and all terms and
conditions referred to therein shall govern your access and utilization of
this website. Copies of the Online User Agreement may be obtained through the
"Registration" Section on this website. This website is intended only for
commercial enterprises in certain specified jurisdictions.
3. This website and the information and material which it contains are
subject to change at any time by Enron without notice and Enron reserves the
right to suspend, terminate or restrict your access to or use of this
website. All warranties, whether express or implied, as to the accuracy or
completeness of the information contained on this website or in respect of
any materials or products referred to on this website are hereby excluded to
the extent permitted by law.

NETSCAPE NETCENTER	spacer	??Search??-??WebMail??-??My Netscape??-??Buddy Chat??-??Help
??-??Download??
		spacer

Check out our advertiser! Click here.

	[IMAGE]Home > ?Netscape?Search		?[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	Search Results

		- Search Categories -Arts & EntertainmentBusinessComputing &
InternetGamesHealthHome &
FamilyNetscapeNewsRecreationReferenceRegionalScience &
TechnologyShoppingSociety & LifestylesSportsWorld
			[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

	Search Here:
	[IMAGE]
	amazon.com
	 legal and...
	Buy Books Here
	Holiday Shopping

	[IMAGE]

	Click here!

	?

	[IMAGE]
	Specialized Searches
	Yellow Pages
	People Finder
	Maps and Directions
	Product Search
	Decision Guides
	Local Information
	International Search

	[IMAGE]
	Search again for
	'  legal and...  ' using
	Google

	[IMAGE]
	Learn More
	Search directly from your browser.
	Internet Keywords
	Netscape Search
	Affiliate Program
	Frequent Questions
	Tips on Searching

	[IMAGE]
	 Get Involved
	Help build the largest human-edited directory on the web.
	Become an Editor
	Suggest a Site
	Give Feedback

	Get the latest
	Communicator.
	  [IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

					Search Results for ' legal and privacy page
					[IMAGE]

					[IMAGE]
					Reviewed Web Sites
					Web sites reviewed and categorized by a team of editors.
					1 - 1 ?of ? 1

					 CPierson's Cyberlaw Page
					Links to cases, statutes, and legal information relating to the Internet,
including First Amendment, intellectual property, privacy, commerce, and
crime.
					http://www.cpierson.com/
					found in:? Society > Law > Legal Information > Computer and Technology Law
?>? Legal Links
					?

					[IMAGE]

					 Search for 'legal and privacy page' with these other search engines:
					AltaVista |  AskJeeves | Excite | GoTo |  HotBot | LookSmart | Lycos

					[IMAGE]
					??Search Again or Ask a Question
					[IMAGE]

					???
						[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	??Netcenter Help??-??Site Map??-??Advertise with Us??-??What's
New??-??What's Cool 	[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
Check out our advertiser! Click here.
,?2000 Netscape. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy


Below are driving instructions to Sara Shackleton's residence for Marie
Heard's party on Friday, June 9, 2000, from 6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.  If you
have any questions or need additional information, please call me at x37340.
Thanks, Suzanne

Driving Directions To Sara,s From The Enron Building
(West University Area):

Take  US 59 South

Exit Weslayan

Turn left on Weslayan and go to Coleridge (4 blocks past Bissonnet [Randalls
on the corner of Bissonnet ])

Turn left on Coleridge

House is beige stucco on the right hand side of the street in the middle of
the block

3915 Coleridge
(713) 664-3207


Form review meeting will be held in EB38c2 on Wed., 5/17, a 9-10:30 a.m.


I have put the executed doc in the mail.  Mark


Hello.

I would like to receive a brochure and room rates for 2001.  I visited your
website and it looks wonderful.

Please send the info to Kay Mann, 29 Inverness Park Way, Houston, TX, 77055.

Thanks,

Kay


John,

I've received internal approval to participate.  I'll see what I can come up
with for a bio.

Thanks,

Kay

"Cogan, John" <JCogan@KSLAW.com> on 03/12/2001 05:06:53 PM
To: "'C. Kay Mann (E-mail)'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: RE: Roundtable

Dear Kay, I was delighted to hear from John Keffer that, subject to
receiving internal approvals, you would be joining us for our Roundtable
discussion on Thursday. When you get the necessary approvals could you
please send me your bio so that we can make sure you get due credit in The
Texas Lawyer? Many thanks, John C.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:   Keffer, John
> Sent:   Monday, March 12, 2001 4:47 PM
> To:   C. Kay Mann (E-mail)
> Cc:   Cogan, John; LaFollette, Chris; Coley, Randy
> Subject:   Roundtable
>
> Dear Kay,
>
> Confirming our discussion, The Texas Lawyer has asked King & Spalding to
> organize a Roundtable Discussion of lawyers and business people to discuss
> how the two professions relate to each other in the context of complex
> business transactions.
>
> The Roundtable would take place privately in a conference room in our
> offices with a court reporter recording the discussion, which would then
> be published in an upcoming issue of the newspaper. Participants will have
> the opportunity to edit their remarks before they are published. John
> Cogan will be co-chairman of the proceedings with our partner, Chris
> LaFollette.  I unfortunately cannot attend as I will be out of town.
>
> The Discussion will take place on Thursday, March 15, from 2 to 3:30. We
> will hold a planning session over lunch in one of our conference rooms
> from 12:30 to 2. No other preparation would be required.
>
> You would be a terrific representative from Enron to join us and provide
> Enron's perspective. Please confirm your attendance as soon as you get the
> internal approvals by calling John Cogan at 713.276.7371 or by e-mail at
> jcogan@kslaw.com.
>
> Best regards,
> John
>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


In addition to World Markets Energy information  <http://esource.enron.com/worldmarket.asp>
 and Country Analysis and Forecasting, <http://esource.enron.com/worldmarket_CountryAnalysis.asp>

eSource now offers free access to World Markets - Regulatory Analysis

World Markets Regulatory Analysis offers:

		Daily Reports - Legal, regulatory and policy developments in 185 countries. Comprehensive monitoring of legislative, regulatory and policy
 			changes for each country
		Email Alerts -  Automatic daily email alerts of current and impending legal, regulatory and policy changes affecting the development of markets
		Daily Analysis - Same-day in-depth assessment of the impact of legal developments by in-house analysts. Features detailed analysis of key legal
			changes written exclusively for Regulatory Analysis by a unique network of legal experts in more than 180 countries
		Country Reports - Assessments of the legal systems in 185 countries, including rules on establishing a business and restrictions on foreign investors

		Access World Markets Regulatory Analysis:  http://esource.enron.com/worldmarket_regulatory.asp

										***

		For additional new products and reports, visit eSource's Hot Topics page at http://esource.enron.com/hot_topics.asp


Start Date: 1/31/02; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002013106.txt


Jeff

Thanks for taking  the time to speak with me today about the Xcelerator.  I enjoyed the chance  to hear your thoughts on the effort, and appreciated the opportunity to  speak with Greg as well.  (Through our discussion, it is clear why he  is a respected leader in the "mafia".)  Please feel free to contact me if  you wish to discuss the Xcelerator further.

Thanks  again.

Heath

Heath Schiesser
626-278-1746heaths@mail.com


It will be on the Calp invoice... which Enron was reimbursing Calp. So... we
will probably now need to get $$$$ back from Calp. What a joy!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mark Feldman@ECT
05/12/2000 04:23 PM
To: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: TCO PENALTIES - REVERSED!!!!!!!!!!

I do not see any credits on this current bill which is 4/00 production.

Joan Veselack@ENRON
05/12/2000 09:53 AM
To: Mark Feldman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: TCO PENALTIES - REVERSED!!!!!!!!!!

FYI... please pass on to others that I missed in your arena.

---------------------- Forwarded by Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron on 05/12/2000
09:51 AM ---------------------------

Joan Veselack
05/12/2000 09:50 AM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin
Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, vlamadr@enron.com, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: TCO PENALTIES - REVERSED!!!!!!!!!!

TCO decided to reverse the penalties Enron incurred in January and February.
The credit is on the TCO's invoice for April.

January = $13,424
February = $13,775

Total Credit = $27,199

TCO Team discussed this penalty situation with TCO's VP, Marsall Lang. TCO
decided that Enron had not abused the system and did not overrun the TFE
(Total Firm Entitlement). YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


You can send both, but I'd have folks keep it close to the vest.  Definitely
want to make sure that none of our stuff ends up in the hands of the media.

	Susan J Mara
	07/06/2001 12:52 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Bond Leg Language, etc.

Can I send this or the draft Sher bill to ARM members?

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/06/2001 10:51 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	07/05/2001 12:07 PM

		 To: Ann.Cohn@sce.com, kmccrea@sablaw.com, mkahl@ka-pow.com,
jdasovic@enron.com, wbooth@booth-law.com, drothrock@camfg.com,
smutny@iepa.com, brbarkovich@earthlink.net, dominic.dimare@calchamber.com,
isenberg@hmot.com, jstewart@cmta.net, mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com,
lga@mother.com, debinorton@aol.com, cra@calretailers.com,
derek.naten@roche.com, vjw@cleanpower.org, "John R. Redding (PS, NE)
(E-mail)" <john.redding@gene.GE.com>, "Mike Florio (E-mail)"
<mflorio@turn.org>
		 cc: (bcc: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron)
		 Subject: Bond Leg Language, etc.

Greetings:

Hope everyone had a pleasant 4th.

I've read the respective Burton and Hertzberg language on amending AB 1X.
The Burton language looks cleaner and simpler, though there may be reasons to
include some of the Hertzberg language, too.

I'm proposing to the group the following as potential amendments to the bond
bill.  I would appreciate your feedback.  The amendments would be as follows:

Customers who were on Direct Access when DWR started buying power (Jan.
17th?), and are still on Direct Access when the bill passes, should be exempt
from paying for the bonds.

In short, customers should not be forced to pay for power twice--once from
their ESP, and once from DWR.  Since these customers receive power services
from their ESP, they never consumed DWR power in the first place and it
wouldn't be fair to require them to pay for it.

Customers who have been utility customers since DWR started buying power but
subsequently switched to Direct Access should only pay for power provided by
DWR that they actually consumed, no more and no less.

For example, if a customer was a utility customer when DWR started buying
power but switched to Direct Access on May 1st, then the customer would only
be responsible for reimbursing DWR for power deliveries that took place from
Jan. 17th thru April 30th.

I believe that we agreed on these concepts during the negotiations that took
place over the past 4-5 weeks.  Or if we didn't explicitly agree during the
talks, they seem to be principles on which we ought to be able to agree
pretty easily now. And rather than leave the issue hanging, which can create
unnecessary and costly uncertainty for customers, I suggest that we include
very clear and simple legislative language in the bond bill clarifying what
customers' obligations are.  Your thoughts are appreciated.

In addition, we have talked quite a bit about providing customers with
incentives in the attempt to get California out of the energy hole that it
finds itself in.  Providing (20KW and above) customers with an incentive to
switch to Direct Access as soon as possible could 1) reduce the net short
position that the state (and ultimately consumers) have to finance, thereby
reducing spot purchases and price volatility,  2) reduce electricity
purchasing costs, and 3) reduce the burden on the state budget.

With this in mind, I'm also proposing that the group consider an amendment to
the bond bill that would exempt from bond charges any customer that switches
to Direct Access by September 1st.

Finally, it seems odd that the language directing the PUC to suspend Direct
Access is still in the bill.  If a dedicated rate component is created, that
seems to eliminate altogether the need to suspend Direct Access.  And if
that's the case, would it make sense to delete that language from the bill?

Look forward to your comments and working with you to get support for and
passage of the "core/noncore" proposal.

Best,
Jeff


<TITLE>Gas Indices - IntercontentalExchange</TITLE>

IntercontinentalExchange

Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin

For Natural Gas Delivered on Tuesday, November  27, 2001

(Trade Date of Monday, November  26, 2001)

Click here to access index history.

* volume represents sell-side only *

 Region
    Hub	High
Low
Wtd Avg Index
Change ($)
Vol (mmBtu)

Hub Name

LOUISIANA

    <NOBR>ANR SE	          $1.9200	          $1.7000	          $1.7880	-    .0765	         220,200	American Natural Resources Pipeline Co. - SE  Transmission Pool

    <NOBR>Columbia Onshore	          $1.8500	          $1.6700	          $1.7328	-    .0989	         311,200	Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. - Onshore Pool

    <NOBR>Henry Hub	          $1.9900	          $1.7200	          $1.8169	-    .0946	       1,029,600	Henry Hub tailgate - Louisiana

    <NOBR>NGPL LA	          $1.9300	          $1.7250	          $1.7974	-    .0054	         251,200	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Louisiana Pool

    <NOBR>Tenn 500L	          $1.7900	          $1.5700	          $1.6212	-    .1506	         145,500	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 500 Leg Pool

    <NOBR>Tenn 800L	          $1.8000	          $1.5600	          $1.6387	-    .1740	         242,000	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 800 Leg Pool

    <NOBR>TETCO ELA	          $1.7500	          $1.5400	          $1.6387	-    .2475	         179,800	Texas Eastern - East LA

    <NOBR>TETCO WLA	          $1.7800	          $1.5550	          $1.5922	-    .1966	         193,200	Texas Eastern - West LA

    <NOBR>Transco 65	          $1.8800	          $1.7200	          $1.7901	-    .1489	         307,800	Transco - Station 65

    <NOBR>Trunkline ELA	          $1.8000	          $1.6000	          $1.7018	-    .1073	          95,400	Trunkline Gas Company - East Louisiana Pool

    <NOBR>TxGas SL	          $1.8300	          $1.6200	          $1.7482	-    .1489	         239,300	Texas Gas Transmission Corp.-Zone SL FT Pool

MIDCONTINENT

    <NOBR>MichCon, citygate	          $2.1750	          $1.9700	          $2.0246	-    .0829	         230,400	Michigan Consolidated

    <NOBR>NGPL Midcont	          $2.0000	          $1.6000	          $1.7958	+    .0926	         149,700	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Mid-Continent Pool

    <NOBR>NGPL Nicor, citygate	          $2.1000	          $1.8000	          $1.9184	+    .0368	         723,200	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nicor Citygate

    <NOBR>NGPL NIPSCO, citygate	          $2.1500	          $1.8800	          $1.9807	+    .1037	         130,200	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nipsco Citygate

    <NOBR>NNG Demarcation	          $2.3000	          $1.9900	          $2.0768	+    .3292	         226,800	Northern Natural Gas, Demarcation Pool

NORTHEAST

    <NOBR>Columbia TCO	          $1.8800	          $1.6900	          $1.7377	-    .2106	         404,500	Columbia Gas Co. - TCO Pool

    <NOBR>Dominion So.Point	          $2.1000	          $1.6400	          $1.7539	-    .3828	         225,700	Dominion - South Point

    <NOBR>TETCO M3	          $2.1200	          $1.8100	          $1.9092	-    .2559	         155,400	Texas Eastern - M3 Zone

    <NOBR>Transco Z-6 (NY)	          $2.1500	          $2.0100	          $2.0679	-    .2582	         130,700	Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. - Zone 6 (NY)

WEST

    <NOBR>El Paso non-Bondad	          $2.1750	          $1.5900	          $1.9711	+    .5273	         159,700	El Paso - San Juan Basin, Blanco Pool

    Huntingdon/Sumas	          $2.2400	          $2.1800	          $2.1966	+    .5209	         120,400	Westcoast Energy & Northwest Pipeline Corp.

    <NOBR>Opal	          $2.2000	          $1.8000	          $1.8893	+    .4327	         152,200	Opal

    <NOBR>PG&E Citygate	          $2.4800	          $1.7900	          $2.2783	+    .5771	         293,000	PG&E - Citygate

    SoCal Border	          $2.4100	          $1.8500	          $2.1203	+    .5317	         203,000	Southern California Border Points (Ehrenberg,Topock,Needles)

WEST TEXAS

    <NOBR>El Paso - Keystone	          $2.2200	          $1.5200	          $1.9687	+    .3724	         477,900	El Paso - Keystone Pool

    <NOBR>Waha	          $2.1500	          $1.8800	          $2.0206	+    .3608	         254,200	Waha Hub - West Texas

Includes all firm physical fixed price trades done from 7 AM to 11:30 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for natural gas delivered on the specified date(s).

IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.

In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.

This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.

You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.

To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com.

To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe.

©Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


do you still want me to hold off on these.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Acton/Corp/Enron on 04/05/2000 09:25
AM ---------------------------

Vance L Taylor@ECT
03/29/2000 04:44 PM
To: Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Walter O&G/Superior April Noms

Tom,

I recently received this nomination and the total package of gas for the
aforementioned changed as follows:

Counterparty    Meter  Last Nom  Latest Nom  Chg.
Walter O & G    9747  3,901mmbtu/d  3,426mmbtu/d  (475)mmbtu/d
Walter O & G    9787  1,604mmbtu/d  1,713mmbtu/d    109mmbtu/d
Walter O & G    9808  4,890mmbtu/d  4,950mmbtu/d      60mmbtu/d
Superior Natural Gas   9741  2,783mmbtu/d  2,570mmbtu/d  (213)mmbtu/d
          Total change  (519)mmbtu/d
I've made the change in my spreadsheet.

vlt
x3-6353


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2000 12:49
PM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/24/2000 12:07:28 PM
To: " - *Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com" <Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com>, " -
*chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Molly.Johnson@enron.com" <Molly.Johnson@enron.com>, " - *Dalphon,
Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Scott, David"
<dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Bizik, Kim"
<knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Jones, Donna"
<djones1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Destephanis, Kara"
<kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Boyd, Heidi"
<hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *cfrankl2@enron.com"
<cfrankl2@enron.com>, " - *joan.veselack@enron.com"
<joan.veselack@enron.com>, " - *vversen@enron.com" <vversen@enron.com>, " -
*cindy.vachuska@enron.com" <cindy.vachuska@enron.com>, " -
*cora_pendergrass@enron.com" <cora_pendergrass@enron.com>, " -
*mmitche2@enron.com" <mmitche2@enron.com>, " - *scott.goodell@enron.com"
<scott.goodell@enron.com>, " - *steve.gillespie@enron.com"
<steve.gillespie@enron.com>, " - *cgarcia@enron.com" <cgarcia@enron.com>, " -
*despey@enron.com" <despey@enron.com>, " - *joann.collins@enron.com"
<joann.collins@enron.com>
Subject: Updated May '00 FOM requriements

The attached file is an update to the original one sent on Friday with our May
daily volume requirements.   Please refer to the "comments" worksheet and the
comments dated 4/24/00 for differences between this version and the original.
Please let me know if you have questions, problems, etc.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - May00_FOM_Req2.xls


Caroline - Would you be amenable to renaming your weekly report?  There is some confusion that this report is the Gas Logistics report.  Thanks for your help.


To confirm, I am away from the office Thursday April 12 through Thursday
April 19, but reachable by cell at most times.  As Thursday is the Early
Termination Date, the following will need to be completed in my absence (with
Section references to PG&E's Oct. 99 form of Master):

1.  PEGGY/JON:  Unless a replacement deal has been entered into, cut NITs as
of 8:00 am Thursday morning.

2.  GREG:  Determine an estimate of our (i.e. ECC) costs and expenses as a
result of the Default by PG&E, including for Canadian and US counsel under
Section 12.2, and estimating future costs and expenses to be incurred.

3.  CHERYL/JON/GREG:  Determine receivables owing as of the Early Termination
Date under Section 12.3, noting the portion that is pre-petition and the
portion that is post-petition.

4.  JON/GREG:  Obtain quotes from 3 dealers for the Market Value of the
terminated Transactions under Section 12.4.  Greg needs to sit with Jon when
the quotes are obtained, on a taped line, following the outline prepared by
Houston for Portland.  The quotes obtained are to be entered into the log
sheets prepared by Credit, and returned to Credit.  The calls are to be saved
and kept by IT on tape/CD.  Quotation confirmation forms are to be completed
and sent to the dealers providing the quotes, and their return pursued.  A
single, aggregated MTM/early termination/liquidation amount for the
terminated Transactions is to be determined by comparing the Market Value to
the Contract Value and using the Prime Rate as the discount factor under
Section 12.5.

5.  CHERYL/JON/GREG:  Prepare our claim as the aggregate of 2 (costs and
expenses), 3 (receivables) and 4 (MTM) above.  Organize documentation and
quantification in a binder and send copies to Jeff Hodge and Elizabeth
Sager.  Once Jeff/Elizabeth have approved, to formalize the claim send a
notice with a copy of our claim and demand for payment to PG&E under Article
15 of the Master, with payment due on the next Business Day under Section
12.4(iv).  US counsel under Elizabeth Sager's supervision should then pursue
recovery through the bankruptcy proceedings, including by exercising any
direct or affiliate set offs to other positions.

6.  JON/GREG:  If it has not been negotiated and documented before I leave, a
replacement transaction for the 75MM/day may have to be put in place with
PG&E, hopefully under our paper (GTC) with whatever amendments (i.e.
California law) are approved by Jeff Hodge.  We may have to use their paper
(Master) if necessary and approved by Jeff Hodge to obtain the security
interest in their receivables - in which case certain (not all) of the
amendments to their paper that we have been requesting will need to be made.

Peter.


Question of propriety might end access to control room

By Toby Eckert
COPLEY NEWS SERVICE
August 21, 2001

WASHINGTON -- Electricity buyers for the state are expected to lose access to a power-grid control room next month, now that a California congressman has raised questions about the propriety of the arrangement.
But a spokesman for the California Department of Water Resources, which began buying electricity for the state during the ongoing power crisis, denied the move was a response to Rep. Doug Ose's objections.
With the crisis no longer so acute, there is less need for water resources personnel to have access to the Independent System Operator's control room in Folsom, said Oscar Hidalgo, a water resources spokesman.
"We're basically trying to cycle out of there," he said.
Ose, R-Sacramento, spotlighted the water resources department's access to the control room during a House subcommittee hearing Aug. 2. In a prepared statement, he charged that the arrangement allowed the water resources department "to cherry-pick its power purchases."
Ose said the arrangement violated federal regulations and "possibly cost Californians billions of dollars in potential refunds."
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has said Department of Water Resources contracts should not be subject to refunds the state is seeking for over-priced power, contending the agency had a competitive advantage.
Among those who once had access to the room were four energy consultants to the state who were fired for owning stock in a power company from which they were purchasing electricity.
Appointees of Gov. Gray Davis oversee both the ISO and the water resources department.
Hidalgo said water resources personnel needed access to the control room to coordinate power purchases during a crisis situation.
"In order to keep the lights on in California, this was something that was necessary, we felt," he said. "We did our best to minimize our exposure to any material that was not intended for our usage."
His comments echoed ISO President Terry Winter's defense of the practice before the House subcommittee.
With numerous long-term power contracts in place and the threat of blackouts receding, water resources has set a goal of removing all personnel from the control room by Sept. 1, Hidalgo said.
Six water resources personnel still have access to the room, he said.
Last week, Winter sent a memo to Ose listing nine people who had access to the room and 14 others who no longer had access.

Copyright 2001 Union-Tribune Publishing Co.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Here's my cut at #3.  I haven't had the benefit of Kim's answer, but made
some assumptions and took a shot.  Likely to doctor it up a bit, but wanted
to find out if folks are in agreement or if you think I've lost my mind.  Let
me know.  #3 is somewhat at the heart of the questions, so I want to make
sure that I get your feedback.  And my apologies for not having gotten you
something sooner.  Be on the look out, there is a cold going around that
really kicked my butt over the last week.

Best,
Jeff


You can ignore my previous e-mail.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Shepperd, Tammy R.
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:29 PM
To:	Rangel, Ina; Neal, Scott
Subject:	6th floor spreadsheet

Here you go!


told you so...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	David Shank [mailto:david.shank@penobscot.net]
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:12 AM
To:	Smith, Matt
Subject:	What is going on?

Damn ENE is looking cheap.  Almost picked up a few shares at 12.5.  What do you think?  buy or wait?

______________________________________________

David Shank
Financial Analyst
Penobscot Corporation
545 Cedar Lane
Teaneck, NJ  07666
Tel. (201) 836-0099
Fax (201) 836-3862
Email david.shank@penobscot.net


Are you new to Enron North America?   Do you want to know more about ENA and
the business units?

          The solution is the Enron North America Orientation.

Register now for the upcoming class on June 15th from 8:30 - 4:15 in EB552.

The purpose of the orientation is to provide employees with a brief overview
of Enron North America and the major business units.  During this class the
following objectives will be covered:

The major business units in ENA and how each department contributes to the
success of ENA
The types of products and services that are offered
The types of counterparties with which ENA interacts
The deal making process
The cultural aspects and how those aspects impact our business

You can register for the class through the Development Center.  (Click here
if you do not have access -  ).   If you have any questions, please call
Gracie Presas at (713) 853-3985.


Looks good to me.? I'm going to be out of the office tomorrow but Tom Cones
asked me to have you send him an execution draft of the agreement for his
signature.

--
John R. Bonica
John R. Bonica, P.C.
3403 Marquart, Suite 203
Houston, Texas 77027-6509

Telephone: (713) 659-6500

jrbonica@bonica.com

This e-mail message may contain confidential information belonging to the
sender that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from
disclosure. This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity
to which it is addressed. If you are not the named addressee, you are not
authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any
part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Gillaspie@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Gillaspie@enron.com]
Sent: April 3, 2001 1:34 PM
To: jrbonica@bonica.com; tomcones@gulfcoastpipeline.com
Cc: Michael.W.Morris@enron.com; Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
Subject: HPL-Gulf Coast IT Agreement

Mr. Bonica & Mr. Cones,

Please? find? the? attached? Interruptible Gas Transportation Agreement for
your? review? and? comment.?? The? document incorporates the changes to the
assignment? and arbitration provisions discussed yesterday. If you have any
questions, please give me or Mike a call.

Cordially,

(See attached file: Gulf Coast-redline 4-2.doc)

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


we can go now


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
 [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]Due to its popularity, we're extending our Free Shipping Offer through the Thanksgiving Holiday Weekend. When you spend $100 or more, we pay your standard shipping costs.  [IMAGE] Excludes Video Game Consoles and Gift Cards [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Abundant Savings [IMAGE] Sale starts Thanksgiving Day. Incredible prices on top name brands, quality learning toys, video game consoles, video games and much more. While supplies last. [IMAGE] [IMAGE] ?LeapPad Learning Center         $39.99 - save $10.00  [IMAGE] ?Game Boy Advance       $89.99  - save $10.00[IMAGE] ?Rumble Robots  $19.99 - save $10.00  [IMAGE] ?Barbie or Ken in The Nutcracker        $19.99 - save 5.00  [IMAGE] ?e-Kara Real Karaoke Singing System     $49.99 - save  $20.00  [IMAGE] ?Rescue Heroes Aquatic Command Center    now $64.99  Sale ends Sunday, November 25th. [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  	[IMAGE]

Subscribe to our Newsletter, Save $5 off your Next Purchase   Because you are a former eToys customer, you're receiving this newsletter from the former eToys Web site for a limited time. Continue to find out about sales and special promotions like free shipping before everyone else! Subscribe to the new eToys Newsletter today, and use this special, one-time use eToys coupon to save $5 off one purchase of $40 or more. (Expires December 31, 2001).   [IMAGE]   The Company Behind the New eToys   KB Holdings, Inc., a company with an 80-year history of delighting parents and children, owns and operates the eToys.com Web site through its KBkids.com LLC subsidiary. As part of a solid, consistently profitable bricks-and-mortar company, the new eToys offers the convenience of returns at more than 1,300 stores around the country, and the stability that means you can shop at the new eToys today, tomorrow and for years to come.   Your Privacy   For your protection, the new eToys Web site won't have any of your account information unless you set up a new account or if you make a purchase. This company understands how much you value your privacy. Please read the Privacy Policy  for more information.   Pricing   The prices on the featured products were accurate at the time we sent this newsletter. On rare occasions, you may find prices in this newsletter different from prices at eToys.   Unsubscribe   If you don't want to receive additional e-mail from us, respond to this e-mail and type "Unsubscribe" in the subject line or in the body of the e-mail.


I'm most likely heading out tomorrow night.  I think Rachel T is going solo
to the Lay's, so I figure she should come with us--but she is away until
tomorrow.
Do you know someone named Melanie Herz?

Alexandra Saler@EES
12/19/2000 02:09 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

my day is ok.  the only bummer is that I couldn't find invites that I needed,
so I am having them designed which will be a royal pain in the
ass....anyway....hopefully I will see you on 50.  I think I am supossed to
volunteer with Misha from 4-4:30 in andy fastow's office.  are you
stilldeciding between tomorrow night and thursday morning?

To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

I'm going to try to go to 50....day is packed, and still haven't decided when
to go to NY.....How's your day?

Alexandra Saler@EES
12/19/2000 10:14 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

are you going to that thing on 50 this afternoon?  do you have a busy day?


Couldn't persuade them to stay in D.C.? Ought to be a lot of fun.  Hope all's
well with all the craziness out there.

Best,
Jeff


IBM would like to distribute the attached press release on Thursday, June 8.
The draft has been reviewed and approved by EES' executive team.  Please
let me know your comments by 5pm on Wednesday, June 7.

Thanks
Peggy Mahoney (57034)


Do we know where J Aron wants us to settle the trade done from London?  If it
is still settled by payment to New York, this one trade probably does not
cause too much heartburn. (See the note from Steve Douglas in Tax next
following.)
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/28/2000 08:58
AM ---------------------------
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: J Aron & Co - Master User in New York , Sub User in London

Yes.  Our tax compliance system is premised upon the trading "pattern" (type
of trader, location, etc.) represented to us in the materials pursuant to
which we establish a counterparty.  In this case, J Aron is transacting via
either a different legal entity in London or a branch of the entity that was
initially approved that is located in London with a password acquired on the
basis that they would be trading from New York (presumably from a U.S.
corporation).  In either event, while there may not be an issue as to this
particular transaction, because we do not know the type of counterparty with
whom we are transacting, we could potentially have a U.S. tax withholding
issue when settlement payments are made (this, of course, assuming that we
settle with the London branch/entity trading with the U.S. approved
password).  Consequently, we would prefer to more tightly contain the trading
patterns of counterparties and not permit this type of trading (doesn't this
violate reps made in the GTC?).  Alternatively, if all that is occurring is
that a U.S. approved counterparty is using a password to transact from a
different physical location, this presents an issue for the counterparty
(namely, creation of a taxable presence in London or such other location)
but, so long as we only settle with the approved counterparty under the terms
pursuant to which their account was set up (i.e., in the U.S. in the case of
this transaction), this should not present an issue for EOL.  Give me a call
should you want to follow up.  Steve.

	From:  Mark Taylor                           01/27/2000 11:46 AM

To: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: J Aron & Co - Master User in New York , Sub User in London

Any concerns?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/27/2000 11:43
AM ---------------------------
   Enron London - EOL Product Control Group                01/27/2000 11:24 AM

Sent by: Arfan Aziz
To: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT, Product Control -
Houston
Subject: J Aron & Co - Master User in New York , Sub User in London

The EOL help desk received a call from Isabelle Ealet at J Aron in London
(0171 774 2103).  She was asking them why she could not trade with her id and
password that she had been given.

I called her and explained that she could not use a Guest Id to trade and
told her that she needed to send in a UK PA (explained to her the location of
the form on the web site).  She said she would send one to us.

Then she told me that it was not a problem anyway because she called her New
York office and asked them to give her and id - they set her up as a sub
user.  She then told me that she transacted a deal in London for EN590.  I
told her that her PA would not cover this and I am not sure she understood
this ?

Therefore she will have transacted in London under a US PA - correct ?
Please advise as to how we are to deal with this.

Thanks

Arfan


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000
08:41 AM ---------------------------

Mary Lynne Ruffer
09/28/2000 05:17 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

Sorry - it's been a long day.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Lynne Ruffer/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000
05:16 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           09/28/2000 02:06 PM

To: Mary Lynne Ruffer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re:

I think you forgot to attach the file.  Send it to Kevin.  I spoke with him
about your questions.

DG

Mary Lynne Ruffer
09/28/2000 11:52 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tracey Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:

See April tab for non-NSS and NSS volumes (each should come to zero
respectively so how do we handle?)
See Aug - Are th TXOK and STX locations non-NSS deals?

Many thanks.