John,

The reason they are high is because they are not population weighted.  This makes a significant difference, looking at 10 cities at 100% versus population weighted, where all of the cities in a region add up to 100%.

If you would like me to weight them, it would not be a problem.

Sachin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 4:48 PM
To:	Gandhi, Sachin
Subject:	RE: Temps

Sachin,

These HDD's look a little too high.  I pulled just 5 cities and they are more than the spreadsheet that you prepared for the fundy's site.  Could you look at them to verify.  Thanks.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gandhi, Sachin
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 4:06 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	Temps

sorry for the delay, the data was not as clean as i originally thought.  let me know if you need anything else.

sachin

 << File: easttemps.xls >>


Fran,

Please be advised that my marital status has changed. I was married on March 17, 2001.

Also, my ID is p00504954.

Thanks,

Paul


Anyone up for Keneally's after work today?


Just a note that the bill from TCO goes to Aristech and CES pays Aristech for
both demand and commodity. Any gas we buy from Enron should not include any
commodity costs. Thanks JPP

Joan.Veselack@enron.com on 04/20/2000 12:12:17 AM
Please respond to Joan.Veselack@enron.com

To: Kara Destephanis/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc: Chris.Germany@enron.com, Jeffrey Porter/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS,
Robert.Allwein@enron.com, Joann.Collins@enron.com
Subject: Re: COH Choice for 4/21 - PLEASE READ - WEEKEND SETUP

Kara, because we are close on the SST's max MDQ, we are going to use some
of Aristech's Capacity. Also, to be pro-active on the huge temperature
swings that we have been seeing on the weekends, we are going to do a 50/50
split with storage. Hopefully, this will prevent overrun charges and
overdelivery gas. Cross our fingers!!!!!!!!!  This has been approved
through Jeff Porter, the CES Choice God!!!!!

Also Joann Collins is on call this weekend. Friday is an "unofficial
holiday" for us. Joann will be in the office tomorrow morning to do Choice.

Contract Changes:

7-1: 67693     11558
     67829     5000 (aristech capacity)
Total          16558

7-5  67693     9693
     67829     3527 (aristech capacity)
Total          13220

Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I dont know how to reply - that is weird, scary, and sad.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"susan schnitzer" <s.schnitzer@worldnet.att.net>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22susan+20schnitzer+22+20+3Cs+2Eschnitzer+40worldnet+2Eatt+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 9:10 AM
To:	wendy seidt; Tracey Lyons; tfinney@mirapoint.com; sandra brawner; pcastellucci@unitedgulf.com; pam anderson; Michelle; mcrawford@tiffany.com; Marci_Paraboschi@timeinc.com; lschoen@halldickler.com; Leah Jordan; julie mac; Janet Schnitzer; frankis; erica rothstein; Elyse Silver; ehyman9645@aol.com; danielle.karwoski@dowjones.com; Christine_castellucci@intdata.com; bdfalkner@cs.com; amy
Subject:	Fw: Strange symbols

-----Original Message-----
From: Diane Freeman <dianefreeman@qwest.net>
To: Cathie Rogallo <cathie1@gateway.net>; Nancy & George Schoenbeck
<catland@bwsys.net>; Tom Parkinson <Colthpark@aol.com>; Danny Marinich
<DMari13445@aol.com>; Milt Ed Jeff Freeman <freemanmilt@qwest.net>; Dorothy
Howard <Howardartthou@aol.com>; Jeff Graham <jlgdej@gallatinriver.net>;
Lorrie Gleghorn <lorrie_gleghorn@hotmail.com>; Sharon & Don Short
<mesatoil@mtco.com>; Michelle Gilkey <Mishrobes@prodigy.net>; Mary Kathryn
Jugovic <MKjugovic@hotmail.com>; De and Rollie Hasselbacher
<RDHasselba@aol.com>; Vicki Klaas <rickklaas@aol.com>; Ron & Nellie Sanders
<ronnel@quixnet.net>; Mike & Alice Street <Streeter5@aol.com>
Date: Friday, September 21, 2001 3:23 PM
Subject: Strange symbols

>Try this!!!
>> >
>> > Subject:    Weird
>> >
>> If you have Microsoft Word, open a blank document and type in Q33 NY (the
>flight number of one of the airplanes that crashed into the WTC). Highlight
>Q33 NY, then, change font size to 72 and change the font to Wingdings 1.
>See
>what happens!
>
>


Send me a new download, I want to see if the changes worked.

Thanks

Darla Saucier@ENRON
05/09/2001 11:14 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Oglethorpe invoice for April

Any updates???

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Chris Germany @ ECT                           05/08/2001 04:09 PM

To: Darla Saucier/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Oglethorpe invoice for April

I added the demand charges but I still need one of my Transco schedulers to
remove the volumes "actualized" on the 9th.

Darla Saucier@ENRON
05/08/2001 09:12 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Oglethorpe invoice for April

Please let me know when you are finished with this.

Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Darla Saucier/NA/Enron on 05/08/2001
09:11 AM ---------------------------

Jim Homco@ECT
05/04/2001 11:24 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Darla Saucier/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Oglethorpe invoice for April

Mr. Germany - following are my notes per info Darla sent me:
Invoice corrections:
 Purchases on 4/9 should be zero.
 Transport charge is OK =  $11,274.31
 I do not see the demand charge in the invoice...
 Also need to add a credit cashout for 12dt's at cashout price.
I will be back in on Wednesday.

Thanks Darla for sending this - don't let Mr Germany - slack off next week.

Darla Saucier@ENRON
05/04/2001 10:16 AM
To: Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Oglethorpe invoice for April

sorry!

I think I referred someone to you that called me about Ormet.  Sorry!  I got
confused about ormet/oglethorpe.  Bad Morning!

Thanks
Darla


John

I got your email regarding our sale to NHEC.  I will be out of the office
March 31, and April 3, 6, 7.  When you get the draft contract, please forward
it ASAP to Brenda Whitehead, my assistant, and Leslie Hansen.  Depending upon
the timing and the extent of the comments either me, Leslie or another lawyer
will be able to help you with this.  The timing may be awkward because all
Enron lawyers will in San Antonio next week, but we will work it out.  Once I
see the draft, I will have a better feel for the timing.

Talk to you soon
Elizabeth
713 853 6349


No GCP adjustments:

 Samuel x3-9890
 Enron Net Works _ Global Counterparty Team

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Moran, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, May  30, 2001 3:30 PM
To: Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Reves, Brant; Brackett,
Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever,
Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa;
Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; Clarke, Sonya; Davies,
Tim; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call
Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; LaFuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus,
Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Kyle III, Bill; Ebow, Amber; Arnold, Thu Pham;
Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark
Subject: EOL Approvals: 05-30-01

Please see attached

 << File: EOL 05-30-01.xls >>
Regards,
Tom Moran
713-853-3017


Naveen,
the "analytical VAR" approach is working for Equity portfolio.
It gives us the tool to examine the tails' behavior for this portfolio and
calculate "Expected Tail Loss".
The same should be done for commodities portfolio as well.

Meanwhile, as we discussed, we can give some rough estimates of the losses
corresponding to percentiles other than 5th.

Look at the figure below. You can see VAR numbers for 5%, 1%, 0.5% and 0.1%
calculated with
1) simulations (100 thousand simulations);
2) analytical VAR (gamma-delta positions representation)

 1) and 2) are very close because there are not many options in Equity
portfolio.

3) simulations (1000 simulations) to calculate 5% VAR. Then in order to
approximately estimate VAR for 1%, 0.5% and 0.1%
I scaled 5% VAR with factors corresponding to normal distribution (for
example: Norminv(0.001,0,1)/Norminv(0.05,0,1) for 0.1%).
The result of such extrapolation in this case is quite good (just 5%
different from the correct number).
We probably can use such rough estimates of tail for commodities portfolio
until we have proper methods implemented.

Tanya Tamarchenko
02/28/2001 01:17 PM
To: Wenyao Jia/HOU/ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: "analytical" var implementation in RisktRAC

Debbie,
I am forwarding to you a 2 page document describing implementation of
"analytical" VAR in RisktRAC.

Here is why this effort is very important:
1. We need to calculate VAR for other percentile but 5 (1% or even 0.2% as
mentioned by Rick Buy)
and our simulation model can not handle required number of simulations;
2. We need to present additional risk measures (such as Mean Tail Loss) to
the Board.

The analytical approach is implemented in a spreadsheet and fully tested
already so there will be no problems
with the algorithm itself.

We need to get together and discuss IT implementation.

What do you think?

Tanya


Set up w/Sylvia Mireles 713/522-1138 x-215 6/07/00 (Jess)


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Kimberly Bates
Sent:	Tuesday, May 15, 2001 8:04 PM
To:	Doug Leach; Barry Tycholiz; Janet H Wallis; Fred Lagrasta; Frank W Vickers; Scott Neal; Hunter S Shively; Thomas A Martin
Cc:	Airam Arteaga; Jessica Presas; Becky Young; Laura Vuittonet; Beth A Ryan
Subject:	Origination meeting

You are invited to a meeting to discuss origination activity for  crude, refined products and petrochemicals.  The meeting will be held on May 21 at 2:00 in Eb 30c1.


Thanks!  Here are mine.  Have a nice evening.  Big deal at Teala's on Dallas.  PJH

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:59 PM
To:	Heintzelman, Pete
Subject:	headhunters

1)  Army Guerrara - 713-817-4180 - army710@msn.com - called about a gas originator in N. California

2)  Todd Kubicki - 630-990-7510 - tkubicki@kappasearch.com

3)  Joelene Whittaker - 801-531-6500 - jwhittaker@stmassociates.com - called about an originator position in Denver - eprime or PSCO

4)  Patti Broderson - 770-792-1962 - Wyndham Mills - called about several jobs - one with FPL as a power originator in California

5)  Matt Shipman - 214-720-6001 - mshipman@kronckecolman.com

6)  Jon Halliburton - 713-965-9381 - jon_halliburton@prostaff.com

Looks like I'm going to Denver to live with Paul Lucci - he said I wouldn't have to pay rent?!?!?!?!?!

Send me your list too.

K.


Ken -

Good morning.

As a follow up to the voice mail that I left for you, following are some
background and preparatory notes for a potential phone call today between
Chancellor Reed and yourself.  Communications and indications from the UC/CSU
team are that he may call you today as a follow up to your discussion with
him on February 2, 2001.  As I mentioned at the Executive Committee meeting
on Tuesday, 2/20/01, all things are moving along well in California with our
clients, PG&E and SCE.  The current exception to the "smooth sailing" is
UC/CSU.  Tom Riley, the account manager for UC/CSU, has prepared the
following outline of business concerns, sequence of events and suggested
talking points.

Ken, thank you for your assistance and continued participation with this
client.

Regards - Dan

******************************************************************************
*********************
Business Concerns

UC and CSU have business concerns regarding Enron's action to De-DASR their
accounts.  They have not communicated their concerns with enough detail that
would allow us to address them, but I have been able to surmise that they
consist of the following:

1.  UC/CSU is now a bundled access customer instead of a direct access
customer.  AB-1X, recently signed by Gov. Davis, has ban language preventing
large commercial/industrial customers from going Direct Access.  Per Jeff
Dasovich of Enron Gov. Affairs, it is not clear, but possible, that if we had
not De-DASRed the accounts, that UC/CSU might have been grandfathered as a
direct access customer.  Further, SB-27X (still pending), which is Senator
Bowen's attempt to reverse the ban language of AB-1X, may have a financial
ramification for customers switching to and from Direct Access status.
Dasovich is investigating further.

2.  UC and CSU bought approximately 130 meters from Enron as we implemented
the contract.  Our action is forcing the utility to remove these
University-owned meters, meaning that their meters will become useless.  We
are currently using those meters to provide daily 15 minute interval data as
required in our contract. (Our operations and billing group have come up with
a transition plan that SCE has agreed to. SCE would install dual-sockets
allowing for the installation of the SCE meter, while keeping our meter in
tact, mitigating their concern.  At this point, UC and CSU are not listening
to our business solutions so we have not received feedback from them on this
solution).

3.  We have a contractual obligation to be the Universities scheduling
coordinator (SC).  As a result of our action, we are no longer their SC.
They are concerned this may inhibit our ability to act as their SC for their
recent proposal to the ISO under the Demand Reduction Program.

Sequence of Events

February 1 - I informed the UC/CSU electricity oversight board leaders and
contract administrators of Enron's decision.  I walked through the power
point presentation.  They expressed no concerns at that point, and even
expressed appreciation we were standing by our contract.  I sent the UC and
CSU contract administrators the letter later that day advising them of our
decision.

February 2 - Ken Lay called Chancellor Reed assuring the Chancellor that we
will honor the contract.  I have since heard that this call was extremely
well received and that the CSU campus VPs have been advised of the call and
Ken's assurances that were communicated.  We offered the call to the UC
President as well, but were channeled to his SVP.  By the time I made contact
with the SVPs administrator, we had begun receiving letters (below), so I
backed off on arranging the call.

February 5 - UC and CSU contract administrators inform us they have been
speaking to their regulatory advisor and asked for some clarifications.
Maureen Palmer and I speak to the contract administrators and answer their
questions.

February 8/9 - UC and CSU send letters to their PG&E and SCE account managers
advising them they have concerns regarding Enron's decision, and that they
(PG&E and SCE) should only De-DASR on the Universities' request.

February 12 - I received a letter from the UC/CSU contract administers asking
for clarifications regarding our action, and requesting we re-DASR their
accounts.

February 14 - I responded with a letter providing them with responses to
their clarification questions, but did not offer to re-DASR their accounts as
they had requested.

February 16 - UC informed me they were unhappy we did not comply with their
request to re-DASR and indicated they would be sending another letter.  I
suspect this letter will express potential legal recourses.

February 20 - CSU and UC informed they would hold off on the letter pending
outcome of a call between Chancellor Reed and Ken Lay.

Throughout the entire process, I have been asking that the business
administrators meet with us so Enron can hear their concerns.  I gather CSU
would like to do this, however, UC is more inclined to write letters and seek
legal remedies.

Suggested Talking Points for Call and Desired Outcome

1.  We were faced with a difficult business decision, and made our California
decision with our customers in mind.  We have kept our contracts in tact.
Other energy service providers have left the market and their customers.

2.  We are an energy outsourcing company.  We should source supply from the
"best available" source in the marketplace. We feel we have a contractual
right to have made the decision.

3.  Desired outcome is that we want to sit down with the University business
administrators to listen to and address their concerns.  We have not been
afforded this opportunity to date though we have offered.  However, the
Chancellor needs to understand we are not willing to re-DASR their accounts
in the meantime.

I will be available for the debrief with Ken if desired.  I can be reached at
925-543-3703 (office), or 925-548-0326 (mobile) if you have any questions.

Regards, Tom
******************************************************************************
*********************


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/05/2001
08:48 AM ---------------------------

enron_update@concureworkplace.com on 07/03/2001 02:09:20 PM
To: "Steven Kean" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - JB 005

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: John  . Brindle
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: JB 005
Report Total: $10,697.32
Amount Due Employee: $10,697.32

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/13/2001 04:03
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
02/13/2001 04:03 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Energy & Power Risk Management Glossary

Hi Tana,

A little birdie tells me that you  have a supply of the Energy & Power Risk
Management Glossary booklets.  Am I getting close? I've found it to be very
helpful, and I think it would help one of our new lawyers, Carlos Sole.
Could I get a copy for him?  Any other good power references?

Thanks,

Kay


Greg,

Attached for your review and further handling is the Brazos Valley Project,
L.P. Interconnect Agreement which incorporates the changes we discussed this
morning.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Clint,
?
Happy Anniversary to me!? Can you believe it's  been 2 years since I've seen
you!
How's your job going?? Are you planning to  visit Dallas any time this
summer?? We'd love to have you & Jen come up  and see our house (plus?I'd
like to check out your chic & make sure  she's worthy of the Master!) Hope
all is well with you.?
Talk to ya later -- Amy
?
P.S.? Remember my friend Gina?? She got  married last Saturday.? It happens
to the best of us!
?


You are enrolled in the following class:

Power Marketing - Structuring Power Transactions

Class Days and Times:
  5/22/2001  08:00:00 AM - 05:00:00 PM
  5/23/2001  08:00:00 AM - 05:00:00 PM
Room # & Location: EB 552,  Houston
Last Day to Cancel: 05/17/2001
Participant Fee: $800.00
Note: If available, please bring a financial calculator.

Please review any prerequisite material to validate your eligibility in this
class.
Your Company and RC will be charged $800.00

If you have any questions, please call the Development Center Team at
713-853-0357.

Thank you.


Rick

Rob Milnthorp have been discussing whether we want to look for a new
regulatory person in Toronto.  We are leaning towards starting with a new
face.  Give me a call to discuss.

John


[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
	 Attend NetWorldSM+Interop
 in Atlanta for FREE!   [IMAGE] iCan is working closely with NetWorld+Interop to bring you an outstanding offer. Register for  Networld+Interop 2001 Atlanta as a guest of iCan, and attend this premiere event for free! In addition, you may register for any NetWorld+Interop educational program at a 25 percent discount off regular attendee prices. You will also be entitled to a number of exciting benefits including special VIP seating at the Servicing the Enterprise keynote  presentation by iCan CEO, Nancy Li.  Even better, THE FIRST 200 RESPONDENTS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS OFFER will be entitled to attend any NetWorld+Interop educational event ABSOLUTELY FREE OF CHARGE!  This Preferred Guest Program is being offered to you on a first-come, first-serve basis, and participation is limited. So don't delay. To register for the conference as an iCan VIP guest follow the directions below.   When you arrive at NetWorld+Interop, be sure to stop by iCan booth no. 5147 to pick up your VIP Keynote ticket!   Click here to accept these special Preferred Guest offers from iCan!
	   For more information and a complete schedule of activities for NetWorld+Interop 2001 Atlanta, please visit: http://www.interop.com/atlanta2001 . For more information about iCan SP, please visit: www.iCanSP.com .


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
BROWN, WILLIAM W                LOUISE KITCHEN                  Nov 02, 2000
BRUCE, DANIEL                   PHILIPPE A BIBI                 Nov 10, 2000
DETMERING, TIMOTHY J            JEFFREY M DONAHUE JR            Oct 31, 2000
DOSHIER, RAYMOND W              KEVIN P HANNON                  Nov 13, 2000
FITZGERALD, JAY L               LOUISE KITCHEN                  Nov 13, 2000
GARNER, BRUCE                   LOUISE KITCHEN                  Oct 27, 2000
GROS, THOMAS D                  LOUISE KITCHEN                  Nov 13, 2000
MCMAHON, JEFFREY                MARK A FREVERT                  Oct 31, 2000
PIPER, GREGORY F                GREGORY F PIPER                 Nov 14, 2000
ZIPPER, ANDREW A                LOUISE KITCHEN                  Nov 13, 2000


Test

Vince


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/17/2001 03:18 PM -----

	Steven J Kean
	07/17/2001 09:08 AM

		 To: "Bonnie Hugyez" <blh@pkns.com>
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, <mmolland@brobeck.com>,
<mark.e.haedicke@enron.com>, <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>,
<robert.c.williams@enron.com>, <skean@enron.com>,
<breasoner@gibbs-bruns.com>, <mtuohey@velaw.com>
		 Subject: Re: From Michael L. Kirby, Esq.

Bonnie:  Please forward to Michael Kirby.
I think the draft looks good.  Could you also prepare a draft of the letter
we discussed yesterday to convey the proposal to the committee?

"Bonnie Hugyez" <blh@pkns.com> on 07/17/2001 12:34:20 AM

To: <mmolland@brobeck.com>, <mark.e.haedicke@enron.com>,
<richard.b.sanders@enron.com>, <robert.c.williams@enron.com>,
<skean@enron.com>, <breasoner@gibbs-bruns.com>, <mtuohey@velaw.com>

cc:

Subject: From Michael L. Kirby, Esq.

Attached is a draft Nonwaiver Agreement per our telephone conferences of
yesterday after the meetings with Senator Dunn.  I am available in my office
for a conference call to discuss this.

The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying
documents is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney
work product rule and is confidential business information intended only for
the use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or representative of the recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify
Kathryn A. Pugh at kpugh@pkns.com and immediately delete this message from
your system.

 - 289271_1.WPD


A meeting is scheduled with Mr. Jeff Cotner at 10am, Thurs., Nov 15th, RM: ECN 2844.  Please confirm attendance.  Thank you.


Jeff:

Congratulations on the work you have been doing at Enron.  It must be an
exciting time for you and I enjoy watching the company grow under your
direction.  On a different note, my firm has continued to expand it's
business practices.  We have been working with companies like Shell, Texaco,
Coca-Cola, Dell Computer, Bristol-Myers Squibb and others.  I would very
much appreciate having the opportunity to meet with your head of human
resources (or anyone you feel appropriate) to present our capabilities.  Any
assistance you could provide in this area would certainly be appreciated.

Thanks again and look forward to staying in touch.

Gary R. Barton
Barton Associates

Direct #:  (713) 403-5566
Main #:   (713) 961-9111
Cell #:     (713) 443-0008


---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
05:59 PM ---------------------------

Kathy Mayfield
12/13/2000 05:02 PM

To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathy Mayfield/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
04:38 PM ---------------------------

bill_morgan@kindermorgan.com on 12/13/2000 04:34:58 PM
To: kathy.mayfield@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift

Thank you for the Charity Gift Card.  I decided to donate the gift to the
Depelchin Children's Center.


Jim:  The last sentence was changed to "we expect you to perform".   Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike D.
Sent:	Friday, December 21, 2001 2:10 PM
To:	Haedicke, Mark E.; Delaney, David; Dietrich, Janet; Leff, Dan
Cc:	Sharp, Vicki
Subject:	Customer letter

Here is the letter we discussed.  MDS

[Haedicke, Mark E.]  Fall


TECO TAP       120.000 / HPL GAS DAILY

LS HPL LSK IC       30.000 / ENRON


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041606.txt


Vince,

Thanks for the extension.

Rakesh

-----Original Message-----
From:	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Tue 1/8/2002 5:05 PM
To:	Bharati, Rakesh
Cc:	Crenshaw, Shirley; Dupont, Anita
Subject:	RE: extension

Rakesh,

I can extend you leave of absence till
January 15.

Vince

-----Original Message-----
From: Bharati, Rakesh
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 5:00 PM
To: Kaminski, Vince J
Subject: extension

Hi Vince,

Hope things are going well in Houston.  I am presently in Illinois.  It has been pretty hectic.  I will call soon to catch up.  In the mean time, may I request that my leave be extended by another week?  Thanks very much.

Rakesh


Gerald,

I need resolution on these issues as well before you go.

Thanks,
Chris


Attached are clean and redlined versions of the interconnect agreements with
revisions.  Please review and if okay foward to Pace for their review.


Hey,

I just figures something out.  The only email messages that you are getting, from me, are the ones where I am replying to you.  This is due to I had your email address as shannontyer@msn.net, however, I noticed that your return email address is shannontyer@email.msn.com.

We are about to transition to UBS Warburg, hopefully next week.  The whole thing is a pain in the ass, but, I think that it will have very lucrative returns in the future!

So what's been goin' on?  You never returned my call last week.  How's the B&B project?  I heard supper with R & S & R & M went well, except for you having some G.I. problems.  Drop me a line or call if you want to catch a movie or grab  supper some time.

Take care,

Don


Please find his contact information for me.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/04/2001 02:12
PM ---------------------------
From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 03/02/2001 05:15 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer

Walker Waters at the Brunini law firm.


What's up? How are things? Have you had the boards out yet? I need a snow
report. Hope all is well. Better hop but keep in touch.

cd


From today's Gas Daily:

***Breathitt wants more attention on Calif. gas

     Although the energy spotlight has been on California's
electricity crisis, the number of California gas issues at FERC is
continually increasing, signaling the need to focus on the gas side
of the equation, a FERC commissioner said last week.
     "[T]here is volatility in the gas markets as well as the electric
markets," FERC Commissioner Linda Breathitt said at the American
Gas Association's FERC Natural Gas Regulatory and Market Issues
Seminar last week in Washington, D.C. And the cost of gas, she said,
is the component that has the biggest influence on the cost of
electric generation.
     Two issues pending at FERC are whether to re-impose price caps
on secondary market transactions and whether to cap prices on
gas sales, Breathitt said.
     In addition, FERC recently issued an order to help remove
obstacles to increased energy supplies into the West (GD 3/15). In
the order, FERC sought comments on the need to provide rate
incentives for projects that would make additional capacity
available by this summer on constrained pipeline systems. "I believe
that if the commission does provide incentives, we should be very
precise regarding the activity we are encouraging and the incentives
we will be willing to consider, if at all," Breathitt said.
     The commissioner also voiced concern over a California issue
that sits at the state level -- intrastate pipeline facilities.
California, she said, needs to assess whether its intrastate system
is adequate to take gas from the border to its market. "I am
worried that where there is insufficient takeaway capacity, FERC's
actions to increase capacity to the border may result in problems,
such as prorationing," Breathitt said.
     Meanwhile, Breathitt suggested local distribution companies in
California need the ability to use risk management tools. Policies
should be in place to give gas buyers an incentive to use such
tools, including price hedging and the efficient use of storage, she
said.
     But regulators should be careful in noting the difference
between hedging to reduce exposure to price volatility and what
Breathitt called "mere speculating." While hedging can be used to
decrease uncertainty, speculating to beat the market can actually
increase the possibility of risk, she said.
     Regulators in California and other states should look into the
benefits of reducing gas buyers' dependence on the spot market. "A
balanced portfolio of long- and short-term contracts makes a great
deal of sense when spot prices are at the extreme levels of the past
year," she said.     CD


Take a look at the attached and let's discuss.  Maureen is in Vince
Kaminski's group and wants to leave.  How about reg risk?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/22/2001 03:21 PM -----

	Maureen Raymond@ECT
	02/21/2001 07:36 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Resume and Website

As promised yesterday, attached is my resume and the link to the FX and
Sovereign Risk group's website.  I have also enclosed a list of the projects
that I have recently completed.  In addition the projects, I have attached an
inventory of the  curves that I have produced for corporate-wide deal
assessment.  I produced 483 curves last year for 58 countries, each curve
requires a full country risk analysis including a macro-economic policy
analysis, balance of payments analysis, and political risk analysis.  I look
forward to continuing to provide you with economic analysis in the future.

I hope to see you in two months.

http://ecthou-webcl1.corp.enron.com/research/ForeignExchange/FXMain.htm

Regards,

Maureen


Attached is your actual form.  I did not have a totally blank one to forward,
as I have actually done work on all evals on my disk.  So I am sending yours
so that you can erase your data and use this as a template.  Hope this works!


i think thats rite -think curve flattens somewhat.back end the overvalued
part for now. i think we more consolidate sideways choppy for a few sessions
but if the present  rate of injections continue the end users/utilties will
have to stop buying cuz of real phys limitations to take the gas into
storage. funds short but only 6% of open int and have covered later part of
last week.
  think vol comes in again too.i think it sale 4.50 scale up-talked to some
others to o thinking it cant go below 4.00 so i actually think more the
suprise in the short term for a break of 4.00!! so who knows/cud work the
other way.
   agree-disappointed at lack of producer selling-we had one deal come thur
but its been worked for months so not price relevant.
  when are you in town next?

-----Original Message-----
From: John.Arnold@enron.com [mailto:John.Arnold@enron.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 6:34 PM
To: LaFontaine, Steve
Subject: Re:

most bullish thing at this point is moving closer to everyone's
psychological $4 price target and that everybody and their dog is still
short.  next sellers need to be from producer community.  saw a little this
week with williams hedging the barrett transaction but wouldnt say thats
indicative of the rest of the e&p community.  short covering rallies will
get more common here.  velocity of move down has slowed significantly for
good (except maybe in bid week).  my concern is if we go to $4 and people
want to cover some shorts, who's selling it to them?  might feel a lot like
it did when we were trying to break $5.


Jennifer Milligan will be contacting regarding the intern program.  She will
probably want a resume from you.
Also,  she will want to know what area(s) (eg. accounting, marketing,
research, etc.)  you have interest in working.

Please keep me up to date once she contacts you.

Sincerely,

Scott
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000 05:06 PM
---------------------------

Scott Neal
11/12/2000 07:58 PM
To: "Christopher Graeter" <cag9783@labs.tamu.edu> @ ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Internship

Haven't forgot about you yet.  I will have the information for you this
week.  Thank you for your persistence and
patience.

Sincerely,

Scott

"Christopher Graeter" <cag9783@labs.tamu.edu> on 10/19/2000 02:55:41 PM
To: <scott.neal@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Internship

Scott-
 Hey there, this is Chris Graeter.  I wanted to check with you to see about
getting in touch with the person in charge of internships.  I am sure he or
she is busy, but in the mean time I was not sure if you or the person who
would be contacting me had my email address.  It is cgraeter@tamu.edu.  I
know that sometimes it is easier to get in touch with someone by email so I
wanted to make sure you had this information.  Thank you again for all your
assistance.  I hope to talk to you soon.

Sincerely,
Chris Graeter


Hi Sherrie and Sally -

To let you know that Ken has agreed to join another board.  It is i2
Technologies, Inc.  The company is based in Dallas.

Please let me know if you need further information.

Rosie


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 04:48
PM ---------------------------

mbjohns@duke-energy.com on 01/09/2001 03:59:14 PM
To: kayne.coulter@enron.com, dbjohnso@duke-energy.com,
mbnewman@duke-energy.com, obtadloc@duke-energy.com, alfesper@duke-energy.com,
wfcatoe@duke-energy.com, kebrown@duke-energy.com, lbcrisp@duke-energy.com,
rrpadget@duke-energy.com, plsams@duke-energy.com, rtbrown@duke-energy.com,
jtconrad@duke-energy.com, odalton@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Selling to ENRON

Yesterday afternoon (1/8/01) during a conference call with ENRON, there was
a discussion regarding issues associated with hourly sales to ENRON in
order to define expectations associated with these hourly sales. Below is a
summary of the expectations and conclusions reached.

Non-Firm Energy Sales:
Duke Power regards a verbal commitment to sell non-firm hourly energy to a
customer as an agreement for Duke to sell/deliver energy to the designated
delivery point and the customer, ENRON, to purchase/receive this energy at
the designated delivery point with ENRON taking the risk of obtaining
transmission paths beyond the designated delivery point and completing
required tags correctly. After a non-firm energy schedule has begun and a
new official TLR event occurs which results in curtailing the schedule,
Duke considers this a Force Majuere event and ENRON will only be billed for
the energy delivered.

Take or Pay Energy Sales:
Duke Power regards a verbal commitment to sell Take or Pay energy to a
customer as an agreement for  the customer, ENRON, to purchase this energy
at the designated delivery point with ENRON taking all risks and accepting
to purchase all energy scheduled.

ENRON expressed the desire to develop  a strong relationship with Duke
built on conducting business "the right way". The ENRON Real-time Desk
Management is committed to this desire and are our contacts for future
problems and concerns.
Kayne Coulter, Mgr., Real-Time Desk  1-713-853-4340
Juan Hernandez, Supervisor, Real-Time Desk  1-713-853-0383


Houston Angel Network members:

 HTC is pleased to present Verliant to the Houston Angel Network.
For additional information, please contact Pamela Harris, Founder, of
Verliant.

 Best regards, and as always, your feedback is greatly appreciated.

 Michelle Weisblatt
 Development Manager
 Houston Technology Center
 www.houstontech.org

 Verliant, Inc.
  <<...>>
 Corporations today are confronted with a myriad of laws and
regulations from Federal, State and Local governments. Complying with these
regulations costs companies billions of dollars annually, in direct
compliance costs alone.   Furthermore, the risk of non-compliance is
significant and costs companies both directly, in terms of fines and
litigation, and indirectly in terms of increased insurance premiums.  OSHA,
which is only one of several compliance categories, estimates that companies
spend over $67 million annually--in fines alone.   Litigation and settlement
can cost multiples of the government fines.  Verliant has developed a
web-based, artificial intelligence tool that helps companies maintain
regulatory compliance and successfully manage operational risks. The initial
product focuses on compliance in environmental, health, safety and training.
The technology is developed and has completed a successful beta test with
its first client, Allied Waste Corporation. Contracts have been signed with
initial revenues to occur in January 2001.

 Technology & Product
  * U.S. employers face a multitude of onerous record
keeping and compliance responsibilities. The administrative burden of
maintaining up to date knowledge of, and complying with, regulatory
requirements is significant.
  * Verliant automates key management compliance
processes that were previously ignored or handled manually by employers' HR,
Safety or Legal departments.  Employers recognize significant cost savings
in compliance and substantial decreases in non-compliance.  Likewise,
productivity and the effectiveness of safety programs are enhanced.
  * Applications modules include: Human Resources
(Employee Record Management); Healthcare Compliance Auditing; Medical
Surveillance; Substance Abuse Program Tracking; Training, Evaluation and
Endorsement Tracking; DOT Driver Qualification File Maintenance; Event
Management; Accident and Injury Reporting, Tracking and Analysis; and
Industrial Hygiene.

 Market
  * There are over 6.5 million American firms that must
comply with regulatory standards.
  * OSHA estimates annual compliance costs at $33
billion.

 Marketing Strategy
  * Initial focus will be through direct sales to
Fortune 2000 companies.
  * Pricing is based on a monthly fee of about $2 per
employee.
  * Verliant has signed contracts with Allied Waste and
San-i-Pak.
  * The company plans to implement multi-tiered, direct
sales, distribution model supplemented by resellers with substantial
existing presence within niche target markets.  The company is negotiating
agreements with several resellers in both the medical and waste management
industries.

 Competition
  * Verliant has identified two direct competitors. The
first is Medgate, a privately held Canadian company that offers several
competing modules, but is not yet internet-based. The second is Complient,
which is in development of an internet-based compliance solution,
supplemented by training and safety product sales.
  * Other companies such as J.J. Keller, a privately
held company focused on the Department of Transportation (DOT) solution
only, is not internet-based.
  * A more distant competitor is PureSafety.com, which
focuses only on OSHA Training Tools.
  * Verliant is developing strategic relationships and
marketing alliances with several companies in the medical, waste management,
and PEO industries.

 Competitive Advantages
  * Management Team - The Company's executive management
skills, domain expertise, market knowledge, distribution channels,
intellectual property, and price versus performance are one of its greatest
strengths.
  * Superior Functionality - No competitors offer
Verliant's comprehensive suite of compliance rule-based solutions, on-line
document imaging, or full-service data entry and date loading.
  * ASP Delivery Model - The advantages of the ASP
include easy to use Internet based solutions, proprietary compliance rules
algorithms, and flexible reporting functions.
  * Brand Leadership - The Company's competitive
strategy will be based upon building brand awareness by virtue of its
expertise and the founder's reputation in the occupational health and safety
industry.

 Organizational Information
  Management Team
  * Pamela E. Harris, PhD, President and CEO - Founder
of Verliant. Ph.D. in Environmental Science and a Masters in Public Health,
20 years experience in the safety and health field including VP, Safety and
Health Services at BFI. 3 years on the BOD, National Safety Council.
Recognized as one of the nation's top 50 women executives by the New York
Times.
  * Martin Scheid, VP Business Development (Forte Group
Partner) - MSEE, MBA with 24 years experience in senior management in the
high tech sector, including 15 years with Compaq in business development,
mergers and acquisitions.
  * Jeff Collins, COO (Forte Group Partner) - BSE, MBA
with 16 years of commercial, operational and technology development with
such firms as BP Amoco, where he was VP of Business Development.
  * Ms. Joan Eckerman Jones, MPH - VP Marketing with
over 10 years experience in strategic marketing.
  * Natalie Williams - 15 years experience managing data
quality, interface and input mechanisms, report design and vendor
performance.
  * Deborah Vint - Healthcare Sales - 23 years
experience in the healthcare field, managing clinical practices, as well as,
administrative, technical, and professional staffs.
  * Roger Clayton - IT Manager - 19 years experience
designing and managing database applications.  He has created many Microsoft
based business applications
  Advisory Board
  * Mr. Patrick R. Tyson, JD - Partner, Constangy,
Brooks and Smith; Chairman of the Board of the National Safety Council,
Former Acting Head of OSHA (Reagan Administration).
  * Ms. Susan J. Piller, JD - Vice President and
Associate General Counsel for Waste Management, Inc.
  * Mr. Robert Broun - Principal for 15 years with
Wellington Associates, Inc., a Dallas investment banking firm.

 Financial Projections
  Revenue Model
  * Verliant's revenue model will include sales in both
direct and reseller channels of distribution.
  * Verliant will achieve over $300 million in
cumulative revenues and will attain market penetration goals of up to 20%
during year 5 of operations.

   <<...>>
 Capital
  * The founder has contributed over $600,000 in seed
stage funding.  The company is now seeking $2,000,000 through the issuance
of Series A preferred shares.
  * Funds will be used to support ongoing operating
expenses, technology and web site development, the purchase of business and
computer equipment, and the deployment of sales and marketing plans.
  * Break-even profitability is projected by year-end
2001.

 Contact Information
  * Dr. Pamela Harris, President, Verliant, Inc.
  5715 Whitemills, Houston, Texas 77041-5503
  Ph:(713)466-0829
   Fax:(713)896-4571
   pharris@verliant.com

  <<...>>
 Please note:
 Investments resulting from introductions by HTC may involve a high
degree of risk.  HTC has neither evaluated nor endorsed the merits of any
investment opportunity presented through its services and makes no
recommendations regarding the appropriateness of particular investment
opportunities for particular investors.  Each potential investor must rely
on his or her own judgment regarding the merits of a particular investment
opportunity.


Jeff --

Our Internal Communications group is continuing to look for ways to
communicate with employees in a timely manner about hot topics that are of
interest to them.  We're also looking to increase your exposure with
employees.  We have a new idea, which Sherri discussed briefly with you a
couple of weeks ago.  It's called "Jeff's Corner" and it will be a regular
video message that will be posted on the intranet -- which can be accessed by
99.9% of our employees.

This is how it will work.  We will tape a 2-3 minute video of you talking
about what's top of mind at that moment.  The tone and style will be like
your floor meetings (one of your best employee venues), casual and
conversational.  We suggest the first topic be "The State of Enron."  There
is a lot of talk among employees about the cheap shots we've taken as a
company and by you and Ken, about the decline in our stock price and about
the widespread re-deployment efforts.   These recent events are  beginning to
affect morale.  Employees are concerned and want to be assured that we're on
the right side, that they will have jobs, that Enron will be here next year.
You've helped reassure them about these things at recent floor meetings;
however, that is only a small part of our global work force.  Having your own
corner on the intranet will have a farther reach, and we have the capability
to do this in-house at very low cost.

We recommend making this a regular communication feature at least monthly,
although since this would only involve a few minutes of your time, you could
even tape a message to employees weekly.  The nice thing about this medium is
we have the ability to respond immediately to current events, and having you
speak to employees gives the message credibility.

Future topics could address new cost saving procedures, update on Dabhol, the
PRC, reasons behind an organizational announcement, The Pulse survey, etc.
We'd like this to be a forum where you can talk about topics you'd like to
discuss.

I've checked with the technical team, and we have the capability do this
now.  I will check your calendar with Sherri.  Let me know if you have any
questions.

Mary


Attached find two drafts, one a redline/strikeout and the other a clean first
draft of the RTO West tariff glossary.  In addition to making the changes we
discussed to the Transmission Operating Agreement, I also took the liberty of
adding a number of definitions that I cribbed from the FERC pro forma
(changing "Transmisison Provider" to "RTO West" where applicable).  I
recognize that some of these definitions may not be applicable to the new
types of transmisison service but I thought if we made these definitions
available to the technical groups they could tell us if they needed them and
we would be assured that terms were used consistently with the FERC pro forma
and throughout the RTO West tariff.


I have a call into Jean Ryall to discuss.  Agreed that we need to keep our FERC team in the loop.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Lawner, Leslie
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 11:10 AM
To: Steffes, James D.; Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Subject: FW: Re Brian Redmond

Since this matter involves communications directly with Commissioner Wood, should we involve someone from the DC office?  I know they want to be the clearinghouse for high level communications with FERC.  We should also probably alert Hartsoe, just as an FYI.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent: Wed 8/15/2001 10:28 AM
To: Noske, Linda J.
Cc: Lawner, Leslie; Steffes, James D.
Subject: FW: Re Brian Redmond

Linda - Could you please include Leslie in this meeting if she's available at whatever time you can schedule everybody else.  She is something of a 311 expert and it would be helpful to have her involved in the initial discussion.

 -----Original Message-----

From:   Steffes, James D.

Sent:   Wednesday, August 15, 2001 7:25 AM

To:     Noske, Linda J.

Cc:     Ryall, Jean; Cantrell, Rebecca W.

Subject:        FW: Re Brian Redmond

Linda -

Pls work with Brian Redmond's asst to have a meeting with me, him, Jean Ryall, and Becky Cantrell.

Thx.

 -----Original Message-----

From:   Cantrell, Rebecca W.

Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:23 PM

To:     Steffes, James D.

Subject:        Re Brian Redmond

Jim, Brian has been working with Jean Ryall on Texas issues and he assumed she would be the right person for the Pat Wood contact.  He sent her a draft of a letter last night in fact.  (See below).

The PowerPoint presentation is one that he made to TRRC staff.

He wants to push on both fronts (Texas and Federal) to get more competition in the state.  Said he would like to get together, but he's out Thursday, Friday, Monday and Tuesday.  Linda can get with his assistant and set something up for late next week if you are available.

 -----Original Message-----

From:   Redmond, Brian

Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:13 PM

To:     Cantrell, Rebecca W.

Subject:        FW: FERC

FYI

<<overview010801.ppt>>

 -----Original Message-----

From:   Redmond, Brian

Sent:   Monday, August 13, 2001 5:58 PM

To:     Ryall, Jean

Subject:        FERC

Jean,

Please find the attached letter to Pat Wood as follow up to our meeting last week.  Please modify with your thoughts and resend.

Also, should we visit with Max Yzagurie at the Texas PUC?

Regards,

Brian

<<PatWood.doc>>


+ Strike by Department of Telecom Employees
+ Finance Ministry considering super regulator for financial sector

U.S.-India Business Council to host Indian Finace Minister Yashwant Sinha and
U.S. Secretary of Commerce Norman Mineta for the U.S.-india Commercial
Dialogue at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on September 14, 2000 at 11 a.m.

Please contact Rick Rossow at rrossow@uschamber.com for further details on
registering for this event

USIBC Daily News

September 12, 2000

Agro/Patents/Pharma
Broadcasting/Entertainment
September 10- Rupert Murdoch controlled Star TV is likely to take 25 per cent
equity stake in Rajan Raheja's Hathway Cable Company to firm up its place in
the fiercely competitive cable distribution market. Company sources confirmed
the move, but declined to comment on the price involved. -The Indian Express

?
Communications
September 8- Communications networks in many parts of India were disrupted
because of the indefinite strike by telecom employees seeking settlement of
labor issues before corporatisation of the department of telecommunication
services (DTS) -The Times Of India

September 7- A section of cellular service providers, to ensure a level
playing field, is planning to form a consortium to bid for the national
long-distance (NLD) telephone license in India. -The Financial Express

?? ????
Economic/General News
September 11- The rate of inflation, in India, rose to 5.94 per cent in the
week ended August 26, due to a significant 5 per cent rise in electricity
charges. - The Economic Times

Energy
September 7- The Indian Petroleum Minister, Mr. Ram Naik, has appealed to the
members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to
increase the production levels of crude oil so that prices are brought down
to sustainable levels.? -Business Line

Financial: Trade & Investment
September 11- The finance ministry is actively considering the appointment of
a super-regulator for the financial sector on the line of the Financial
Services Authority (FSA) in the UK. The super-regulator will coordinate among
the function-specific regulators. -Business Standard?? ????

Information Technology
September 10- NASDAQ-listed Satyam Infoway today said it would invest up to
Rs 160 crore ( $1,600,000,000 US) over the next one year to expand its
Internet operations including rolling out new E-Commerce strategies in the
country. -The Indian Express

September 11- The online ad market in India is all set for a quantum leap.
Revenues from the online advertising market are estimated to jump four-fold
by this year, touching an impressive Rs 50 to Rs 60 crore ($500-$600 million
US). -Business Line

September 11- Cybersquatters with devious intent may be in for some legal
action soon. Nasscom, the Indian association of software Companies, says that
it expects its recommendations on the Copyright Act be amended to include
cybersquatting as a legal offence will be passed in the winter session of
Parliament. -The Economic Times

?
Insurance and Finance

Political/International
September 10- The Indian government has set December 2000 as the deadline for
review of all schemes being run by different government departments with a
view to eliminating those programs that have lost relevance. -The Indian
Express

???????
Sanctions
September 11- The Indian steel industry is keeping their fingers crossed on
the possibility of the United States imposing a fresh dumping duty on Indian
steel. The primary concern is that other attractive export markets-like
Canada and Mexico-may follow if the U.S. takes a decision. -Business Standard

Transportation/Infrastructure
September 7- The Indian Inter Ministerial group (IMG) today decided to
prohibit schedueled domestic airlines from picking up equity stake in Indian
Airlines (IA), blocking any plan of Jet Airways or Sahara Airlines to take
control of the state-owned domestic airline. -Business Line? ???

September 8- Members of the SkyTeam Alliance - Air France and Delta Air- have
jointly decided to bid for a 26 per cent stake in the state-owned Air-India
(A-I), after entering into a joint venture with an Indian partner. With the
Indian partner, the joint venture Company will bid for 40 per cent of the
government's equity in A-I. -The Times Of India


Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save(R) E-mail Update for
December 5, 2000

****************************************************************
Your Freedom to Travel This Week Includes

I. Click 'n Save Internet Specials
II. Announcing! Rental Car Availability
III. Southwest Airlines Vacations Las Vegas Special
IV. Click 'n Save Subscriber Information
V. SWABIZ - Company Online Booking and Tracking

********* SOUTHWEST.COM ONLY SPECIALS *********

I.  Check out our Weekly Click 'n Save Specials.

*21-day advance purchase with the first day of travel
 on December 27, 2000, since December 26, 2000, is
 a blackout date.  Additional blackout dates include
 December 29, 30, 2000 and January 1, 2001.
*Travel December 27, 2000  through March 30, 2001.
*Purchase beginning December 5 through
 December 7, 2000, midnight Pacific Time.
*Click 'n Save Internet Specials are available one-way or
 may be combined with all other fares.
 When combining with other fares, the
 most restrictive fare rules apply.
*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers)
 once purchased will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.
*Scroll down for more details!

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials at
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/?src=click

Fares do not include a federal excise tax of up to $2.75
that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $12 roundtrip.
Fares shown are each way.

Albany, NY
 $34  each way to/from Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC
 $69  each way to/from West Palm Beach, FL
 Note: West Palm Beach service begins January 21, 2001

Albuquerque, NM
 $36  each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $40  each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $37  each way to/from Phoenix, AZ

Amarillo, TX
 $36  each way to/from Dallas, TX (Love Field)
 $99  each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX

Austin, TX
 $60  each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $42  each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $99  each way to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC
 $34  each way to/from Albany, NY
 $34  each way to/from Cleveland, OH
 $99  each way to/from New Orleans, LA

Birmingham, AL
 $57  each way to/from Jacksonville, FL

Boise, ID
 $36  each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Buffalo, NY
 $65  each way to/from Orlando, FL

Burbank, CA
 $34  each way to/from Las Vegas, NV

Chicago, IL (Midway)
 $64  each way to/from Jackson, MS
 $40  each way to/from Omaha, NE
 $66  each way to/from Providence, RI

Cleveland, OH
 $34  each way to/from Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC

Columbus, OH
 $62  each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Corpus Christi, TX
 $48  each way to/from Dallas, TX (Love Field)

Dallas, TX (Love Field)
 $36  each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $48  each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $36  each way to/from Houston, TX (Bush Intercontinental)
 $36  each way to/from Houston, TX (Hobby)
 $36  each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX

Detroit, MI
 $55  each way to/from Nashville, TN
 $42  each way to/from St. Louis, MO

El Paso, TX
 $36  each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $60  each way to/from Austin, TX
 $40  each way to/from Lubbock, TX
 $37  each way to/from Phoenix, AZ

Ft. Lauderdale, FL
 $34  each way to/from Jacksonville, FL

Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $99  each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $99  each way to/from Little Rock, AR

Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $66  each way to/from Nashville, TN

Houston, TX (Bush Intercontinental)
 $36  each way to/from Dallas, TX (Love Field)
 $52  each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $55  each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $56  each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Houston, TX (Hobby)
 $36  each way to/from Dallas, TX (Love Field)
 $52  each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $55  each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $69  each way to/from St. Louis, MO
 $56  each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Indianapolis, IN
 $45  each way to/from Kansas City, MO
 $99  each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $36  each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Jackson, MS
 $64  each way to/from Chicago, IL (Midway)

Jacksonville, FL
 $57  each way to/from Birmingham, AL
 $34  each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale, FL

Kansas City, MO
 $45  each way to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $99  each way to/from Orlando, FL

Las Vegas, NV
 $34  each way to/from Burbank, CA
 $99  each way to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $34  each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $99  each way to/from Orlando, FL
 $99  each way to/from Spokane, WA

Little Rock, AR
 $99  each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $30  each way to/from Providence, RI
 $65  each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Los Angeles, CA
 $34  each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $49  each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT
 $99  each way to/from Seattle, WA

Louisville, KY
 $99  each way to/from Manchester, NH
 $62  each way to/from Orlando, FL
 $34  each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Lubbock, TX
 $40  each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $99  each way to/from New Orleans, LA

Manchester, NH
 $99  each way to/from Louisville, KY

Midland/Odessa, TX
 $40  each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $42  each way to/from Austin, TX
 $36  each way to/from Dallas, TX (Love Field)
 $52  each way to/from Houston, TX (Bush Intercontinental)
 $52  each way to/from Houston, TX (Hobby)

Nashville, TN
 $55  each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $66  each way to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $41  each way to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

New Orleans, LA
 $99  each way to/from Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC
 $99  each way to/from Lubbock, TX
 $99  each way to/from San Diego, CA

Oakland, CA
 $44  each way to/from Portland, OR
 $49  each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Oklahoma City, OK
 $55  each way to/from Houston, TX (Bush Intercontinental)
 $55  each way to/from Houston, TX (Hobby)

Omaha, NE
 $40  each way to/from Chicago, IL (Midway)

Ontario, CA
 $45  each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Orlando, FL
 $65  each way to/from Buffalo, NY
 $99  each way to/from Kansas City, MO
 $99  each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $62  each way to/from Louisville, KY

Phoenix, AZ
 $37  each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $37  each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $62  each way to/from Sacramento, CA

Portland, OR
 $44  each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $56  each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Providence, RI
 $66  each way to/from Chicago, IL (Midway)
 $30  each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $99  each way to/from Austin, TX
 $41  each way to/from Nashville, TN

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $45  each way to/from Ontario, CA

Sacramento, CA
 $62  each way to/from Phoenix, AZ

Salt Lake City, UT
 $36  each way to/from Boise, ID
 $49  each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $49  each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $56  each way to/from Portland, OR

San Antonio, TX
 $99  each way to/from San Diego, CA
 $61  each way to/from Tulsa, OK

San Diego, CA
 $99  each way to/from New Orleans, LA
 $99  each way to/from San Antonio, TX
 $41  each way to/from San Francisco, CA
 $34  each way to/from Tucson, AZ

San Francisco, CA
 $41  each way to/from San Diego, CA

San Jose, CA
 $47  each way to/from Seattle, WA
 $68  each way to/from Tucson, AZ

Seattle, WA
 $99  each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $47  each way to/from San Jose, CA
 $34  each way to/from Spokane, WA

Spokane, WA
 $99  each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $34  each way to/from Seattle, WA

St. Louis, MO
 $42  each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $69  each way to/from Houston, TX (Hobby)
 $36  each way to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $34  each way to/from Louisville, KY

Tampa Bay, FL
 $62  each way to/from Columbus, OH
 $65  each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Tucson, AZ
 $34  each way to/from San Diego, CA
 $68  each way to/from San Jose, CA

Tulsa, OK
 $56  each way to/from Houston, TX (Bush Intercontinental)
 $56  each way to/from Houston, TX (Hobby)
 $61  each way to/from San Antonio, TX

West Palm Beach, FL
 $69  each way to/from Albany, NY
 Note: West Palm Beach service begins January 21, 2001

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials
Other Terms and Conditions:

Tickets must be purchased through the Southwest Airlines
web site at http://www.southwest.com/ The fares listed
above are per person for each way of travel.
Fares listed are for general information only and
are not a reflection of current seat availability. Travel
may originate in either direction.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials are nonchangeable and
nonrefundable. *Ticketless Travel Online may only be
purchased with a credit card. Customers holding funds from
a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials may be combined with
all other fares. When combining with other fares, the
most restrictive fare rules apply. Seats are limited
and won't be available on some flights that operate
during very busy travel times and holiday periods.

Changes to any portion of the reservation
(flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers)
once purchased will result in the cancellation of
the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
fare available which could result in a fare increase.
Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
full unrestricted fare.

Of course, if your favorite city is not listed, we have many
other incredible fares to all Southwest cities. To find more
great fares on Southwest Airlines, please visit Reservations
or check our Fares Information online at
http://www.southwest.com/

*****ANNOUNCING! RENTAL CAR AVAILABILITY*****
II.  Do the math!  Now reserving your flights and rental
cars on southwest.com adds up with a special double
credit offer.  Receiving a free award ticket just got easier.
Check out this special offer at :
http://www.southwest.com/rapid_rewards/rr_promotions.html

*********SOUTHWEST AIRLINES VACATIONS*********
III. Sensational Vegas Vacation for Two Adults from
Albuquerque, Burbank, Los Angeles, Ontario, Oakland,
Phoenix, Salt Lake City, San Diego, San Francisco,
San Jose, and Sacramento.
Packages include roundtrip air, two nights hotel, Rapid
Rewards credit, and 24-Hour traveler assistance.  Offer valid for
travel November 1, 2000 - March 15, 2001.  Purchase by
December 31, 2000. Certain blackout dates apply. To check out
our spectacular prices, please visit us at:
http://www.swavacations.com/landslide.htm

************ SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION **************
IV. Please pass this great news on to your friends!
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines
Click 'n Save E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and re-subscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save email updates.
Please visit our subscription page at:
http://www.southwest.com/email/

************************** SWABIZ *************************
V. Company Travel Managers can book and track
their company's business travel on SWABIZ. To find
out more about this FREE service, simply visit:
http://www.southwest.com/swabiz/?src=cnswabiz

***************************************************************

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2000 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: [ebass@enron.com]
You can unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email


FINAL DAY TO REGISTER - RICE MBA INFO SESSION

PLEASE RSVP BY 12:00 NOON
NOVEMBER 2, 2001

THANKS!

Come learn about the Jones Graduate School of Management at Rice University!  This is your opportunity to meet to meet with individuals from the Jones Office of Admissions, as well as with current students and alumni.

Date:  Monday, November 5, 2001

Time:  6:00 - 8:00 pm

Location:  ECN 5c2

Space is limited, so please email Constance Charles by November 1st to RSVP.

Thanks, and hope to see you there!


$100 is waiting on 31


Marie,  also as per below re: ECI, please get a copy of the tax i.d. form
from Stephanie.  Also can someone please send a copy to me for my file.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/
----- Forwarded by Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron on 05/31/2001 04:54 PM -----

	Cheryl Nelson
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson
	05/23/2001 06:14 PM

		 To: Marie Heard/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Docs to File

Marie, I am forwarding to you for Brokerage files

1. A copy of the executed copy of the Javelin Technologies Agreement that was
faxed to me.  We need to follow up to get the original.  In the meantime,
we'll put this doc in the executed file.

2.  A copy of the ECI - Bear Stearns guaranty that I had faxed to the office
while I was in New York.

Also, Stephanie, reminder that I believe that we still have not sent a signed
Tax Form to Bear re: Enron Credit Inc.  (although we did so for Morgan).  In
any case, Mike Bruegel at Bear says he does not have it.  Please send one to
him.  His phone number is 312-663-3253.  This did not affect the opening of
the account but they still need it.  Please make sure that in fact we also
sent one to Goldman.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/


Thanks for looking into this for me.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Hector McLoughlin @ ENRON                           10/04/2000 02:06 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Later Transfer

Sally,
Lisa Cousino's transfer to EBS will be a lateral move in salary and position
per the offer letter that she will be receiving.
Hope this helps.    Let me know if there is any other information that you
need.
hgm


On December 5th we wrote you regarding a special offer for *HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW*. Since we have not heard from you, we wanted to follow up before this special offer closes. The original offer is presented in its entirety below. If you are simply not interested, we apologize for the intrusion.  --------------------------------------------------  Accept a free Harvard Business Review trial issue today. Plus a free online copy of "Choosing the Right Leadership Style." http://hbr.ed10.net/ud/L3Y9/3OGR/720N/OS/HCWN7   Ideas are what power a business. If they're weak, they may hurt you. If they're robust, they will help you flourish. Which is why business leaders who want insight and advice they can trust all have a single destination.  Harvard Business Review.  HBR is where they read about new business ideas first. It's where the world's most renowned experts come first when they want to share vital new thinking. And it's where you should come first for indispensable management input.  This is your opportunity to experience HBR first-hand with a free trial issue.  Discover a depth you won't find anywhere else. Harvard Business Review explores ideas from a wide variety of angles, with essential reportage, distinguished writing, and probing analysis.  And yet, HBR remains solidly, intensely grounded in practicality.   We focus on problems - and propose solutions. We present ideas - and show you how to act on them. You'll get the next best thing to face-time with the likes of Tom Siebel, EMC's Michael Ruettgers, and Nestle's Peter Brabeck. You'll even get to hear what Super Bowl coach Bill Parcells has to say about turning a team around.  Act today, and we'll send you a free trial issue. It's yours to keep - risk-free, and at absolutely no cost to you.   As a new subscriber, you're also immediately entitled to a free HBR OnPoint Collection, Choosing the Right Leadership Style.  It's yours - free - with your subscription. And you can download it from your computer in just seconds.  Subscribing to Harvard Business Review is entirely risk-free. Our promise to you is as simple as it is binding. If you subscribe now but decide to cancel later, you will receive a full refund on your entire payment. All of it - every penny.  To receive your free trial issue - plus your free HBR OnPoint Collection - simply CLICK HERE: http://hbr.ed10.net/ud/L3Y9/UUND/720N/SN/HCWN7   -------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from special offer mailings, please click here: http://hbr.ed10.net/us/L3Y9/OJ/720N/HCWN7/dmthbWluc0BlbnJvbi5jb20=/ .  [[L3Y9-720N-HCWN7-D]] [IMAGE]


Mark,

 So the sailing debate continues.  I got your email
to my mom that New Year's Eve is a possibility.   That is
definitely the time that Bill will be most likely to be able
to come along.  As he told you he is in "vacation deficit"
until the first of the year.  Then I think that the way the
government works it that you get allotted something like
two vacation days every month.   You can take an advance,
but then you are back in "deficit" until you work it off.
In any case, next year is definitely best for Bill.   As
for the original Thanksgiving plan, that will obviously not
work for me b/c I do not want to leave Bill and he does not
get the Friday after Thanksgiving off so there is no way we
can make it down to the Caribbean and back.  Sorry.

 However, as Bill also pointed out I am a third year
law student and I have a tendency to go on vacation
whenever I can, so although Bill cannot join us I may be
able to go at other times this year if the three of us can
coordinate.  I obviously cannot go during exams (early
December) and I have two seminars a week that I really need
to try to attend, but as long as I try to work around those
I am free.   I have two fall breaks this year one in
October and one in November so those are the best weekends
for me obviously b/c I have fewer classes to worry about
missing (October 12th -15th & November 3rd -8th).

 It seems like it is best for you if we get the boat
for a whole week from Sunday to Sunday - right?  If so, I
can certainly go for part of the week like Wed - Sunday.  Do
you think you would be able to pick me up in some port in
the middle of a week?  If not, do not worry about me.  I
will miss you and I will be sad, but I DID just get back
from Tahiti, so I will get over it and Bill and I will
look forward to joining you next year.

 If you can wait until the new year.  I am off
for Christmas Break well into the new year (I go back
after Martin Luther King day).   Also, next semester I do
not have any seminars lined up so I will be able to take off
for a whole week more easily.

 Those are my thoughts.  I am sorry that my
contribution to dates and the sailing plan took so long,
but I would really love to go if we can find the
time.  Let me know what you decide.

Thanks,
Amanda


For Union Carbide for this month only, at Seadrift meter # 1332 only, all
volumes will be under Sitara # 380578, instead of overflowing to swing ticket

It's a Gas Daily priced deal

Any questions - I'm at 3.5923

Thanks


The report named: EMW P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=32&report_name=EMW+P/L&category_cd=9&category_name=EMW&toc_hide=1&sTV1=9&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/19/2001>, published as of 11/19/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Hey, we made a mistake and set up tetco contract 892510 as FTS.  I killed
deal 155389 and created deal 158412.  sorry


w/Mr. Lay, Koenig, Fastow, Causey & Kean


See Joe Hartsoe's summaries of FERC recent RTO orders.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001
10:53 AM ---------------------------
From: Joe Hartsoe@ENRON on 03/21/2001 10:46 AM

Rick  -- Attached is my list of rehearing issues for the Southern and
GridSouth RTO orders that you requested.

Also included are summaries of GridSouth and Southern Orders.


Wonderful! I hadn't received an e-mail back from her so I didn't think she
had talked to them. Great, I'll share whatever information I have with you
guys!

Kenneth Lay@ENRON
09/09/99 03:58 PM
Sent by: Rosalee Fleming@ENRON
To: Elizabeth Lay/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: "Linda Lay" <mrslinda@lplpi.com>@AZURIX, Sally Keepers/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Band

Hi Liz -

I called your Dad to tell him about your e-mail and the band.  He is in Vail
today.  He asked me to call to try to lock in the band, but they have already
had a call from Linda Kessler, so they are getting a quote to her today and
hopefully a contract by tomorrow.  I think that is all o.k.  I talked to
Jennifer.   I'll fax your Dad the e-mail tonight, so he can see the rest of
it.

Take care!

Rosie

Elizabeth Lay@AZURIX
09/09/99 01:53 PM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: "Linda Lay" <mrslinda@lplpi.com>
Subject: Band

 Dad, & Linda-
Can you go ahead and contact the band, I sent an e-mail to the wedding
coordinator and she has not responded (she is new to e-mail) and I'm afraid
we might lose them. Also, she recommended a photographer out of Atlanta, I
love his work, he does candid more so than the traditional portraits. He also
did a number of the Kennedy's weddings, etc. I'll try and get a price quote,
but I might need your help in negotiations. Also, she send some information
on a decorator/ florist who seems phenomenal, I don't know if Linda might be
willing to help me out with that as she knows a lot more about both flowers
and decoration than I do. The Ballroom at the Ritz is pretty basic and he can
turn it into anything but basic. Also, that we if we find a church that is
not so amazing, he can decorate that as well.
The name of the photographer is Dennis Reggie and his number is 404-
873-8088.  Linda Kessler has all the information on the florist, her number
is 888 524 1326.
Mom is going to be responsible for the RSVP's for the wedding.  I will get a
fax machine this weekend.
Let me know if this is a problem and I will try and arrange some of this from
down here, it is just difficult for people to call internationally.
I love you!
Liz & Jose Luis


It's a never-ending cavalcade....


Thank you for booking online at alaskaair.com / horizonair.com.

Your confirmation receipt will be emailed shortly.

Confirmation Code: CRIMLY (Use this code during the check-in process)

As this is an auto-generated email, for reservation assistance, please call
Alaska Airlines at 1-800-alaskaair (1-800-252-7522) or Horizon Air
at 1-800-547-9308.

alaskaair.com / horizonair.com
http://www.alaskaair.com
http://www.horizonair.com


J -- I just talked to our team at Marathon and they're really jazzed about
next Tuesday's meeting.  They're really looking to identify ways that they
can add to our strategy -- politically and publicly -- so they'll likely come
up with a plan with some recommendations after the meeting.

One thing we were supposed to send to them (which I forgot) was the Luntz
survey.  I don't think I ever saw it.  Do you have a copy?  Could you forward
to me and I'll send on?

Thanks -- you're the best!
kd


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Burns, Jennifer
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 9:41 AM
To: Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject: FW: Final 6/19/01 Global Products Notification

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Abel, Chris
Sent: Thursday, June  21, 2001 9:38 AM
To: Burns, Jennifer
Cc: Wilson, Shona
Subject: RE: Final 6/19/01 Global Products Notification

Jennifer,  Jeff has a good point here.  I have added his comments to the
memo.  Please ask him to sign the revised memo and forward it to me.

Thanks,
Chris

----- Forwarded by Chris Abel/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2001 09:25 AM -----

	Jeffrey A Shankman/ENRON@enronXgate <mailto:Shankman/ENRON@enronXgate>
06/21/2001 09:11 AM 	   To: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT <mailto:Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT>,
Rick Buy/ENRON@enronXgate <mailto:Buy/ENRON@enronXgate>, John L
Nowlan/ENRON@enronXgate <mailto:Nowlan/ENRON@enronXgate>, Ted Murphy
ii/Enron@EUEnronXGate <mailto:ii/Enron@EUEnronXGate>, David
Port/ENRON@enronXgate <mailto:Port/ENRON@enronXgate>, Cassandra
Schultz/ENRON@enronXgate <mailto:Schultz/ENRON@enronXgate>, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT <mailto:Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT>  cc: Beth
Apollo/ENRON@enronXgate <mailto:Apollo/ENRON@enronXgate>, Shona
Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron <mailto:Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron>, Kenneth
Thibodeaux/ENRON@enronXgate <mailto:Thibodeaux/ENRON@enronXgate>, Brent A
Price/ENRON@enronXgate <mailto:Price/ENRON@enronXgate>, D Todd
Hall/ENRON@enronXgate <mailto:Hall/ENRON@enronXgate>, Jennifer
Burns/ENRON@enronXgate <mailto:Burns/ENRON@enronXgate>, Araceli
Romero/ENRON@enronXgate <mailto:Romero/ENRON@enronXgate>, Liz M
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT <mailto:Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT>, Cassi
Wallace/Corp/Enron@Enron <mailto:Wallace/Corp/Enron@Enron>  Subject: RE:
Final 6/19/01 Global Products Notification

In this Violation memo, you are taking out positive P&L associated to a nat
gas posion in the LPG books which is a true hedge versus some long dated
propane positions.  When you add back the hedge P&L I believe there is no
violation.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Abel, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 4:25 PM
To: Buy, Rick; Nowlan Jr., John L.; Murphy, Ted; Port, David; Schultz,
Cassandra; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Whalley, Greg
Cc: Apollo, Beth; Wilson, Shona; Thibodeaux, Kenneth; Price, Brent A.; Hall,
D. Todd; Burns, Jennifer; Romero, Araceli; Taylor, Liz; Wallace, Cassi
Subject: Final 6/19/01 Global Products Notification

Attached is the Enron Global Markets Global Products Trading notification
memo for  5 Day Cumulative Loss for June 19, 2001.  The Office of the
Chairman for Enron Global Markets is responsible for printing out a hard copy
of this memo, signing it and returning the hard copy to Chris Abel at 3155a,
who will forward it to RAC to obtain their signature.

Thank You

 << File: 6-19 Global Products 5 Day.doc >>


Brenda,

Can you send me a copy of Bruce's response.  Also, we need to meet on Entex
this week as you suggest.  In my discussions with Bruce, he feels that Entex
can account for all of their gas nominations/takes - and that these
nominations are not related to intra-month price volatility.

We discussed having an initial meeting next week.  Then, if it makes sense, I
think we should involve MidCon in the discussions as their imbalances seem to
be a key factor in Entex changing their nominations.   These meetings would
be to seek to develop a working protocol that we could use to improve
communication and establish more definitive criteria for changing
nominations.

The end game would be a final meeting with Entex senior management to agree a
solution to past sins and a way forward.

Brian

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Brenda F Herod                           09/25/2000 10:53 PM

To: James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Coogler's Response

Please read the attached summary of Coogler's response to the audit
findings.  I would like to get the group together later this week to
determine next steps.

Jim, Dan and Janet:  I would appreciate you all paying special attention to
the claims.  Do you all know what Bruce is referring to?  If you all can do
some research before the meeting, I think we'll be able to get to our next
steps quicker.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
10:44 PM ---------------------------

richard.j.feldmann@us.arthurandersen.com on 09/18/2000 08:29:49 PM
To: BHerod@Enron.com
cc: danny.d.rudloff@us.arthurandersen.com,
frederick.g.rhodes@us.arthurandersen.com,
matthew.l.thomas@us.arthurandersen.com
Subject: Re: Coogler's Response

Brenda,

Matthew reviewed Coogler's responses and brings up the following questions.

We can do one-of-two things at this point.  We can either add the Reliant
responses to our audit report as "Auditee Responses", or we can have Enron
provide answers and possibly have us do some additional work.  The additional
work is dependent on Enron's answers to the questions.

Please advise.

Rick

To:   Frederick G. Rhodes, Richard J. Feldmann
cc:
Date: 09/18/2000 04:29 PM
From: Matthew L. Thomas, Houston , (713) 237-2629
Subject:  Coogler's Response

Rick and Fred:

I hope things are going well up in Salt Lake City.  I have gone through all of
Bruce's numbers today.  I have come up with a few questions that Enron needs
to
answer.

1. Reliant claims that in East Texas the cut off for complementary customers
is
30 Mcf/ day,  does Enron agree?
2. Reliant claims that the "New Technology Contract" overrides  or is an
exception to the Enfolio Master Agreement.  Does Enron agree that this is a
legitimate exception?
3. Reliant claims that all off the industrial mis-classified gas in the
Houston
Division is under "special contracts" with special pricing, and even though
they
are using less than 100 Mcf /day they receive a lower price of 2.71 per MMBTU.
Does Enron agree that this is a legitimate exception?
4. In the Houston Division it appears that Louisiana Pacific only uses gas for
heating in the winter, about three months out of the year.  Is there total
divided by three to find their average usage, or is it divided by 12?  Bruce
divided by three, we divided by twelve.  They are a customer all year, and are
not a new customer, or a customer that has left.
5. Does Enron want to give Reliant leeway on the 100 Mcf rule?  What will the
actual cut off be?  Bruce backs out 137,000 Mcf that was close, but not quite
100 Mcf.

These are the issues that I see.  The first three questions are things that
Enron may have to ask Bracewell and Patterson.  We were not notified of any of
the special contracts that he mentions.  Let me know what I need to do.  If
you
guys have questions for me, it might be easier if we all got on the phone and
spoke about it.  Thanks,

Matthew

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent
to
Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.