You interested in these messages?
-----Original Message-----
From: InSync Online [mailto:InSyncOnline.6ff2j67z.d@insync-palm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 4:38 PM
To: Jeffrey Dasovich
Subject: Palm Store Newsletter Vol. 1

  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/top-visitpalmstore_01.jpg>	 <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?GkRo2705ec-ZB=1>
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
 palm(TM) <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/logo-palm.jpg>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
 What's In Store? <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/hd-title-WIS.gif>
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/hd-flash-image.jpg>
 brought to you by Insync Online <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/hd-btyb-InsyncOnline.gif>
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	Dear Jeffrey,
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
Welcome to the first issue of What's In Store!
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
What's In Store?
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
It's red-hot handheld promotions and specials. Essential software for work and play. Inspiring and entertaining eBooks and more.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
What's In Store is a special monthly newsletter for Palm Store shoppers. So you're always up on the latest Store happenings, including amazing deals for InSync Online members.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
What's In Store is just one aspect of Palm's exclusive InSync Online program. To receive more of the great handheld information Palm has to offer, take a moment to join this free, customized email service.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
You get to decide what Palm sends you. In addition to What's In Store, you can order up info on the latest handheld software and The Palm Voice, which covers news, exclusive product offers, user stories and more.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
Sign up for InSync Online <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?PkRo2705ec-ZTp=291> and begin your personal profile.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
Enjoy What's In Store. When you see something you like, click through for details!
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
-The InSync Online Team

	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
 <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?dERo2705ec-ZQi=181>	   <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/section2A-subhd_with_sub.gif>
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
Sleek, lightweight, expandable. Enter the newly priced m500 Handheld.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
Observe the oh-so-cool SD Expansion Slot that's compatible with Palm's lineup of expansion cards.* And the software! The Palm m500 handheld comes with tons of it-from some of the latest business solutions to fun, challenging games. Then there's Palm's Mobile Connectivity Kit, your easy answer to a wireless handheld experience. It's also included. Along with everything else you need to keep your life running smoothly. All at a very affordable price. Find Out More <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?JkRo2705ec-ZQn=191>.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
*Expansion cards sold separately.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
 <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?XkRo2705ec-ZQc=201>  <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?cERo2705ec-ZTu=301>

	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
 Promotion of the Month <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/section3-hd.gif>
 <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?aERo2705ec-ZQW=221>	   <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	Your Palm? Handheld Rocks! <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?DERo2705ec-ZQL=231>
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
The client meeting is in ten minutes. You can't get a cab to save your life. Better put on your walking shoes.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
You fire up your new Palm m105 handheld, adjust your headphones and tap "Play." Two tunes into your personal play list, you're in the client's lobby singing the praises of Palm's Tunes-to-Go Bundle.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
This Palm Store promotion truly rocks. Just $299 gets you the m105 handheld and the Port?son mp3 player from Shinei, including Liquid Player Plus software. That's $49 off the regular price! But hurry and order, as this special bundle disappears October 1st. Create your own play lists, "skins" and more. A quick trip to the Palm Music Connection <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?bkRo2705ec-ZQA=241> yields your favorite tunes, many for as little as $.99. Check out Palm's Tunes-To-Go promotion <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?TkRo2705ec-ZQF=251>.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
eBook of the Month
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
 <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?YkRo2705ec-ZT6=261> Jack: Straight from the Gut
By Jack Welch, John A. Byrne
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
With 20 years as CEO of General Electric, Welch is one of the world's most admired executives. This refreshingly honest, humorous account of the people who influenced him and the big hits and misses of his career is destined to be a business classic.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
Read More <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?cERo2705ec-ZT_=271>.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>	Software Solutions
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
Mobile Mentor Makes the Grade
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
The fall semester just started and already your head's spinning! Unless of course you've loaded Palm? Mobile Mentor on your Palm? handheld.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
This A+ solution will help you organize notes, assignments and lesson plans, track grades and more. Choose from three, extremely affordable all-in-one CDs packed with top software solutions.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
Check them out <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?WERo2705ec-ZT0=281>.
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/bottom.jpg>
  <http://images4.postdirect.com/master-images/404095/clear.gif>

The content of this message is based on your personal InSync Online profile.
To modify your profile or unsubscribe from InSync Online return to your InSync Online profile by clicking on the link below. Or, unsubscribe by replying to this message, with "unsubscribe" as the subject line of the message.

? 2001 Palm, Inc. All rights reserved <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?dERo2705ec-ZRE=121>  |   Palm.com <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?XERo2705ec-ZQ5=131>  |   Palm Store <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?dkRo2705ec-ZQ-=141>  |   InSync Online <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?aERo2705ec-ZQz=151>  |   eBooks <http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?VERo2705ec-ZQo=161>
  <http://p04.com/1x1.dyn?1jEGrwBSA35Va29aw_n>


Gerald,

The existing gas gathering contract between Tom Brown and Wildhorse does not
dedicate any South Canyon Acreage, only three wells.  There is really no
other place for South Canyon gas to go, except some wells are tied to PSCO.
Most of the gas does not meet the quality specifications in the contract,
and is taken on a blend basis now.  Tom Brown has 10 shut-in wells at South
Canyon.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 3:43 PM
To: kckrisa@apex2000.net
Cc: Steve.Pruett@enron.com; Scott.Josey@enron.com;
Mark.Castiglione@enron.com
Subject: TBI Proposal

Attached are my comments to the TBI proposal.  Please review and let me
know if you have any comments.

(See attached file: TBI Field Services bid response 2-9-01(rev)RED.doc)

I also wanted to clarify a point on the Tom Brown form of gathering
agreement.  The revised form is an interruptible agreement with no acreage
dedication.  Since Tom Brown removed all the acreage dedication language,
it is my understanding that they were not willing to give us an acreage
dedication.  To the extent we modeled our economics on any Tom Brown
production, I wanted to make sure everyone understands that these volumes
are not committed to the system we are purchasing and can be taken by Tom
Brown to someone else at their discretion.


CGoering@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 3:00 and 18:00 in the October 21,
2001 Real-Time Market as well as the following hours per ECA 20010908B to
verify prices:

HQ:  3:00, 5:00-7:00, 10:00, 15:00, 23:00
NE:  7:00, 23:00
OH:  7:00, 23:00
PJM: 7:00, 10:00-18:00, 23:00

Prices in the October 22, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


Hey Team!  Ms.  "Terry" Franklin is part of the team now.  Make sure you copy
her on any appalachian/local production issues.  She will be the one setting
this up in Sitara in the future.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000 08:05
AM ---------------------------

Joan Veselack@ENRON
03/06/2000 07:59 AM
To: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT,
jlinken@colcnr.com, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Heidi
Griffith/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: Re: CNR Contracts.

I called Jill Linkenauger Friday afternoon... haven't heard back. My plan is
to talk to her and then Kevin McCracken at CNR to have this agency switch
over by April 1st. I thought it was done... but not 100% sure.

Robert Allwein@ECT
03/06/2000 07:25 AM
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: CNR Contracts.

Hey cats. Sylvia needs to know if we are agent for CES regarding CNR
contracts. I began setting up the contracts on Friday, but she stopped me in
the middle cuz she wants to make sure that we are setting them up correctly.
I have 50 to 70 to set up. Please let me know what you know. - Thanks, Rob


Please let me know as soon as possible if you can attend this meeting in person or if you want to call-in.  I will provide the call-in number.

Thanks.

Rosie


Yes.  At least now I don't also have lunch with John!

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 02/13/2001 10:35 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: EWS Brown Bag Lunch

Don't you have another meeting over at the allen center on Thursday at 11am?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	02/13/2001 10:33 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EWS Brown Bag Lunch

I want to go to this on Thursday.  I rsvp'd myself.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/13/2001 10:32
AM ---------------------------
   ENA Public Relations
From: ENA Public Relations on 02/12/2001 10:21 PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All_ENA_EGM_EIM
cc:
Subject: EWS Brown Bag Lunch

MARK YOUR LUNCH CALENDARS NOW !

You are invited to attend the EWS Brown Bag Lunch Series

Featuring OZZIE PAGAN

Topic:  East Power
Origination & Trading

Thursday, February 15, 2001
11:30 am - 12:30 pm
EB 5C2

You bring your lunch,            Limited Seating
We provide drinks and dessert.           RSVP x 5-7352


See attached press release
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 04/19/2001 11:19 AM -----

	"Nancy Pickover" <npickover@bracepatt.com>
	04/18/2001 02:25 PM

		 To: <gfergus@brobeck.com>, <alan.comnes@enron.com>,
<Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>, <donna.fulton@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>,
<ray.alvarez@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>,
<thane.twiggs@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: In re:  California Power Exchange Corp., 01-70031, et al.

Attached is a news release issued by FERC regarding a decision in the above
matter.  The court has upheld  FERC's approach to remedying the dysfunctional
California electricity market structures.

Nancy Pickover
Legal Assistant
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
2000 K Street, NW, Suite 500
Washington, DC   20006-1872
(202) 828-5861
(202) 223-1225 (fax)

 - NR01-20.1


you up for woody's tonight?


Jody,

Please FEDEX and fax the GE LOC's to Rick Vicens at Delta Power.

Delta Power
89 Headquarters Plaza
North Tower, 14th Floor
Morristown, NJ 07960

ph:  973-993-1854
fax: 973-326-1821

Thanks,

Steve

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2001 11:22
AM ---------------------------

"Anthony Harrington" <aharrington@deltapower.com> on 05/04/2001 10:29:38 AM
To: <Stephen.Thome@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: LOC

Stephen,
?
Was talking to Rick earlier (who is out of the  office) and he asked that I
pass the message on to you that you can send the LOC  to the office.?? I
trust that you understand what Rick  means.??? Call me if a problem.
?
Tony


please type and send back
thanks


Please let me know what you think so that Nancy can forward to lawyers.  ss
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 01/13/2000
11:31 AM ---------------------------

Nancy Muchmore@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/13/2000 10:57 AM
To: susan.bailey@enron.com, Sara Shackleton@ECT
cc: Andrea Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick
Hopkinson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Corporate Resolutions/EPCA

Attached is the draft corporate resolution which I forwarded to Hope, Duggan
in order for them to begin drafting the resolution in Spanish.  Please let me
know if you have any comments to this draft so that I can forward them to
Hope, Duggan.

Thanks.

Nancy


Please come by 5C2 at your convenience tomorrow as UBS require you to complete missing information on your application form.

Kind regards,

Karen Buckley

Human Resources

Tel: 713 345 4667


Group,

We are short 50 mws for tomorrow at PV through lending with EPE.  25 mws will be under ST-SW, 25 mws will be under ST-WBOM.

We are also short 65 mws for tomorrow at SP-15.  25 mws will be under ST-WBOM, 40 mws will be under ST-CALI.

Both schedules are HE 7-22.  All deals should be under appropriate books.  Please take extra time with the EPE lending.  We would like to do this size throughout August and want to make sure they have no problems.  Details regarding prices and deal numbers will be coming from Kate.

Thanks,
Bill


Have you completed the Houston Fire Department's certification training for highrise evacuations?

If you have, please contact Ed Hearn at ext. 31592.  Ed is looking for new members to add to the 38th floor Emergency Response Team.

Thanks for your participation in this program.

Theresa Zucha
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St., EB3884
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  713/345-4582
Fax:  713/646-3490


Derek,

Attached is the document I prepared on GMI.  The areas that I could not find
data for I have left blank .  If you could also check the accuracy of the
information I have already filled in, I would appreciate it.

Thanks,

Andy


Jeff:

To follow up on my voice mail message, I would like your feedback as I
develop a message around the DWR stranded costs.

Alan, Ban and I have been in touch with the EGM fundamentals and Utility Risk
Management groups to build upon their financial/technical analysis of the
contracts.  I have also had some limited feedback from Michael Tribolet on
credit issues in the contracts.

Chris Calger just came by (I am in the Portland office today) to say that he
wants to make sure that he is part of the discussion concerning our message
on these stranded costs (apparently there are some commercial sensitivities -
for example, a current deal with Allegheny).

Some areas for input:
* Who is our audience (CA state or federal)?
*What is our message, e.g., contracts will impede DA; DWR has overcommitted,
etc.?
*What form should our message take (presentation, memo, one-pager)?

Attached is a presentation I started.

Thanks,

Jennifer


Thanks.  Comments below.  Great input.

From:	James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/16/2001 09:59 AM
To:	Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	California Contract Language

Some thoughts --

1.	Why use the "Special" term?  Just call it DA Charges.  What makes these charges special.  Parallels the def we use of "Special Utility Charges."  Also connotes that these are often imposed outside the normal course of business.
2.	Why limit to "energy procurement" or "public purpose"?  For instance, if the Utilities were to implement a line item charge for past Negative CTC payments, I don't think your language would cover this. Isn't that "future payback of past under collections"?  Seems to me to relate to energy procurement--ie their avoided cost of energy procurement
3.	Does this include the potential for "positive CTC"?  We don't want to miss this cost.  Customer pays CTC as part of "T&D Charges."  CTC is expressly included in the definition of those charges.
4.	What do we do with post March 31, 2002 rate periods?  While the AB1890 rate freeze is premised to continue until March 31, 2002 or when generation-related stranded costs are recovered, we don't know what will be happening after then.  Want to make sure that any non-bypassable charge is paid by customers, including T&D, along with our generation rates.  All T&D is passed through to customer, regardless of when.  We have only priced "retail" generation on these deals.
5.	How does the concept of re-billing versus prospective rate adjustments get incorporated?  Maybe it gets built into the calculation of CTC, but want to make sure that the right value goes to the right party.  I think the rebilling as opposed to prospective will follow the allocation of charges in the contract.  We talk about things like "however styled or payable" to pick up things like that.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, August 15, 2001 4:20 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:

Jim--here is the relevant language.  Customer pays all "Special DA Charges."

"Special DA Charges" means any charges, fees, assessments, adders or surcharges imposed or authorized by any Governmental Authority on "direct access" customers (regardless of whether any such charge is also imposed on other classes or types of customers), however styled or payable, that are related to (i) a Utility's, ISO's or Governmental Authority's energy procurement, including, without limitation, charges for system reliability, rate recovery, future payback of under-collections, amortization of above market purchases and energy load repurchases; or (ii) public purpose programs, including, without limitation, environmental, social/low income, renewable energy utilization, and demand side management programs.  Such charges will apply regardless of whether the energy requirements of the Accounts are being supplied by us or the applicable Utility.


| notifications                                                            |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Minor, Travis added to Dallas Demon Horde's rosters, and Washington, Damon dropped.
If you have a cell phone or pager, you can get this information even sooner! Go to your league's web site and click "Options, Notifications" on the main toolbar to have notifications sent to your pager or phone, via text messaging.

Win a VIP Vegas Vacation! OR Win $600 CASH!
http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffn1106v.cgi
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|        Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.       |
|  Your site is always at http://football.fantasy.sportsline.com/spoogers  |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

FB10SP


Linda:
Here is what Stacy requested.
Carol


Take me off of this list. PLEASE!!!!!


I am meeting with Shona tomorrow to review the scheduling of doorstep reviews
for the first quarter.  As long as the New York review isn't the week of
January 15th, then I think I will still target that week for a London trip.
Don't feel as if you have to clear the whole week for me  - I know that you
are very busy, so I expect that we will work in time together around critical
things that you need to handle.  I will try to send you a list of topics that
I would like to cover by the end of the day tomorrow to give us a starting
point.  You may have some suggestions on others that I should meet with while
I am there.  Thanks.  --Sally

Mike Jordan
12/28/2000 02:46 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Holiday Wrap Up and January Plans

Hope you had a good week - mine was enjoyable despite illness in the family
and a houseful of guests. I am also grateful for the opportunity to get back
to work!!

As to your visit

I will try to clear the week - the only potential curveball is my desire to
be in NY when we do the NY doorstep( timing is uncertain ). I want to hammer
home the need for absolute clarity re the remote office control structure and
to review the SAP implementation work - both should be in place .

I will put together a list of issues/subjects that I would like to update you
on over the next day or so  - we should be able to use that as a working
agenda and a start point for scheduling time.

If there is anything else you would like to review specifically, I will get
the necessary preparation done.

Cheers and Happy New Year

Mike

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           27/12/2000 23:12

To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Holiday Wrap Up and January Plans

Hope that Christmas with your family was fun and that your days off for
shopping were fruitful.  I enjoyed my week off before Christmas, but
certainly felt as if I worked very hard -- shopping, wrapping, baking,
volunteering, birthday party for Tyler on the 22nd (3 years old - not very
good planning to throw that into the mix each Christmas season), etc.   It is
nice to be back in the office this week, although I still have all of those
Christmas decorations to put away sometime soon!

I have tentatively planned a trip to the London office during the week of
January 15.  I will fly over on Sunday, so that I would have Monday through
Thursday in the office there.  I have blocked those days on my calendar and
Patti has made flight reservations for me just to hold that week open.  How
does that work with your schedule?  Will you be in the office that week and
what is your schedule like?  I certainly wouldn't occupy all of your time
during that week, but I wouldn't want to make the trip that week if  you
don't have some time available.  Let me know, and then we can firm up
discussions topics and agendas.  (My thought on that particular week is that
it gets us past year end closing issues and that I could be back in the
office during the week of January 22 and thereafter to communicate bonus
information.)

I am in the office all of this week.  --Sally


Keith,

Here are the changes recommended by my legal group.  Let me know if you have
any comments.
Thanks,

Kevin
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000
04:34 PM ---------------------------

Dan J Hyvl
11/09/2000 03:02 PM
To: Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Comments concerning Line Pack Gas Purchase Agreement form provided
by Vector.

Kevin,
 As we discussed, here are the changes I feel need to be made to the form
before Enron North America Corp.  can agree to use it.

1.  Change 1.1 to read as follows:  This Agreement shall be effective upon
its execution and shall continue in full force and effect through December
31, 2000.

2.  Change 3.1 to read as follows:  Upon not less than 36 hours advance
notification by Vector, Seller shall be obligated to sell and deliver to
Vector, and Vector shall be obligated to purchase and receive from Seller, at
the time stipulated by Vector in the advance written notification, at a Point
of Sale, a quantity of gas equal to Seller's PSQ for such Point of Sale, as
specified in Exhibit A to this Agreement.  The parties agree that time is of
the essence in this Agreement..

3.  Add 4.2 to read as follows:  4.2  If Vector fails to purchase and receive
from Seller the quantity of gas required to be purchased and received by it
under Article 3.1 for any reason other than the occurrence of an event of
Force Majeure, Vector shall indemnify Seller and shall be liable to pay
Seller an amount equal to the difference between the price that would have
been paid to Seller and the Gas Daily low price, set forth in Gas Daily under
the heading "Daily Price Survey" under the listing applicable to Chicago and
using the low price in the range of prices published for the day that Vector
failed to perform multiplied by the volume Vector failed to purchase and
receive from Seller for such day.

4.  Add the following language at the end of 9.1.  For breach of any
provision for which an express remedy or measure of damages is herein
provided, such express remedy or measure of damages shall be the sole and
exclusive remedy hereunder.  If no remedy or measure of damages is expressly
herein provided, the obligor's liability shall be limited to direct actual
damages only, such direct actual damages shall be the sole and exclusive
remedy hereunder and all other remedies or damages at law or in equity are
waived.  Unless expressly herein provided, neither party shall be liable for
consequential, incidental, punitive, exemplary or indirect damages, lost
profits or other business interruption damages, in tort, contract, under any
indemnity provision or otherwise.

5.  Add the following Seller's information in 10.1.
 Enron North America Corp.
 P. O. Box 4428
 Houston, Texas 77210-4428
 Attn:  Documentation and Deal Clearing Desk
 Facsimile No. (713) 646-4816.


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 11:10 AM -----

	Allison McHenry@EES
	04/10/2001 10:52 AM

		 To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Frederking Baby Girls

Since you were inquiring of his number, I thought you might want to know this!

---------------------- Forwarded by Allison McHenry/HOU/EES on 04/10/2001
10:52 AM ---------------------------

Cathy Deleonardis
04/10/2001 10:36 AM
To: EES-HOU Legal
cc:
Subject: Frederking Baby Girls

I received a voicemail from Will this morning.  Kimberly had 4 baby girls.
Will did not leave any information on the babies, just that they are very
small.  He will be out of the office for a few days but will be checking
voicemail.  I will send flowers from the department.

Hospital:

St. Lukes
6720 Bertner Avenue
H, TX 77030
no room assigned yet


The compliance department for DB Alex Brown has rejected our comments to the
Prime Brokerage Agreement.  Jason, since the file is in your possession, I
left word with the compliance officer, Terry Finn, to contact you so that
their concerns could be addressed.   Terry's phone number is (410) 895-3602.

Today conversations will be logged in Lotus Notes.  In the interim,  please
let me know if there is anything else you guys want me to do on this issue.

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America, Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
05:25 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@btu.net> on 12/01/2000 05:18:52 PM
To: "Btu Weekly" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu Weekly

Attached is the latest issue of Btu Weekly.

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wg120400.pdf


great.. looks like its a go.  will send offical email out this afternoon.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Taylor@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Taylor@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 9:18 AM
To: Marc_Cutler@bmc.com
Subject: Re: ? Question

Hey Marc! - We're in town this weekend - let us know if you plan something.

"Cutler, Marc" <Marc_Cutler@bmc.com> on 04/10/2000 03:05:47 PM

To:   "Ron Bateman (E-mail)" <ron_bateman@gensler.com>, "Wallace Bennett
      (E-mail)" <WDBennett@equiva.com>, "Bobby Carmack (E-mail)"
      <RCC515@aol.com>, "Jeff Clarkson (E-mail)" <jclark02@coair.com>, "Ken
      Council (E-mail)" <Kenneth.Council@equistarchem.com>, "Mike Gibbons
      (E-mail)" <mg4960@ypsmail.swbyps.com>, "Edwynna Graham (E-mail)"
      <egraham@bofasecurities.com>, "Danny Holland (E-mail)"
      <Danny.Holland@EngageEnergy.com>, "Paul Iademarco (E-mail)"
      <paul.a.iademarco1@jsc.nasa.gov>, "Judy Tamayo (E-mail 2)"
      <Judith.A.Tamayo@BankofAmerica.com>, "Mark Taylor (E-mail)"
      <mark.taylor@enron.com>, "Doodeheefver, Kelli"
      <Kelli_Doodeheefver@BMC.COM>, "'hburright@aol.com'"
      <hburright@aol.com>
cc:
Subject:  ? Question

G & I were discussing having a Sunday afternoon cocktail party next Sunday
(Palm Sunday, April 16).  Considering it is kind of last minute, and it is
Palm Sunday weekend, we wanted to take a quick poll:

Question:
If we planned a gathering between 2pm-5pm on Sunday would you be able to
attend.

Thanks for your help.

MRC


Meg:
I was wondering if you are able to give me an idea of when I would hear from
the Admissions Office.  My application has been with the office since Jan.
21st.  UT is my first choice and I am very interested to hear form the
School.  Thank you for your help and hope to hear from you soon.  Thanks!
Ben


Greetings All:

First, I am apologizing in advance for any typos in this email.  Schedule is
very tight, but I wanted to make sure that everyone had it first thing this
morning, with some back-up info that I've included below.

Attached is the email that was sent to Ken Lay's office yesterday evening for
delivery to Sen. Brulte.  It's of course confidential.  Few points:

I don't have Bev's email, so if you could please forward to her, that would
be appreciated.
As we discussed (Jim, Mike, Bev, Scott, Hedy) on our lengthy call on
Wednesday, I'm assuming that the plan is still to "wallpaper" Sacramento with
our proposed legislation.
This email does not contain the legislation.  Mike sent the "final" versions
of our legislation out yesterday, except for the siting piece, which I
believe Brian Cragg of Mike's office is finalizing today.
You'll note that we promise Senator Brulte in the email that we'll deliver to
his office today the proposed legislation.  Again, based on our call on
Wednesday, I'm assuming that we would simultaneously release the proposed
legislation to the rest of the world at the same time.
When we spoke on Wednesday, we decided that the Sacramento team would
determine to whom we would circulate the proposed legislation at the same
time that we deliver the Senator Brulte. I'm assuming that you folks will
handle that end of things.  Please let us know at your convenience to whom
you've decided to circulate.
This email does, however, include a "summary" of our proposed legislation.
But I'm not certain that the summary included in this email is the
appropriate language to distribute "to the world," or if we'll need instead
to tailor some new language.  I think we all agreed that we need a "one
pager" to accompany the legislative package so that we can communicate the
package effectively.
We also discussed the need to quickly develop a coalition to support our
proposals.  We didn't finalize that plan.  Perhaps the Sacramento team could
propose a plan to do that.  Perhaps we could start with our friends in the
Direct Access coalition?
We also talked about the need at this point to engage in PR and to get the PR
machinery activated, also with the goal of effectively communicating our
legislative package/message.  We're in a meeting with folks today where we
can discuss getting that side of things going and Karen Denne has contacted
Marathon and they're pondering some things that we can do in the near term.
You'll note that there's a considerable amount of information about the DWR
credit issue.  As I recollect, we discussed the issue in depth on the call.
You note that attached to the email is a "legislative fix" to AB1X that could
solve the credit issue and an attached set of "taking points" related to a
second alternative to solving the credit issue:  a PUC order clarifying that
DWR will get its money for power purchase costs.
Note also that Steve Kean reminded me that we've got to continue to push to
get the utilities out of the merchant function.  Accordingly, I've put a
brief paragraph on that issue in the note to Brulte in the last section
(legislative solution) under the topic "create a real competitive retail
market in California."  To the best of my knowledge, we don't have
legislative language on that piece yet, and it seems that we'll need to
discuss it in considerably more depth before doing so.

If you have any questions about any of the materials in the email, please
don't hesitate to contact me or Jim or Sandi to discuss.  I can be best
reached to day by pager at 888.916.7184.

Thanks to all for helping pull this together.

Best,
Jeff

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/16/2001 08:27 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/15/2001 06:11 PM

		 To: jdasovic@enron.com, skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Steve:
Here's a substantially more cleaned-version, with attachments.  There's a
hard copy on your chair.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/15/2001 05:57 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/15/2001 05:56 PM

		 To: jdasovic@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Jim:
It was a pleasure speaking with you yesterday.  Based on our conversation,
this email includes the following:

An Enron contact to discuss developing small-scale generation on Tribal lands.

Our views on the impediments to distributed generation and suggestions on how
to remove those impediments.

A description of the credit issues that continue to impede DWR,s ability to
sign contracts with power suppliers, and options to resolve them. Two
possible options for addressing the credit issue are 1) a California PUC
order clarifying that DWR will recover its power purchase costs through
rates, and 2) an amendment to AB1X designed to accomplish the same goal.  I
have attached talking points regarding the California PUC order and proposed
amendments to AB1X.  We believe that an amendment to AB1X is the preferable
option.

Our assessment of the supply/demand picture in California.

Our suggestions for a legislative package designed to solve both the near-
and long-term electricity crisis in California.  We will deliver to your
office tomorrow detailed legislative language.  In those materials we will
also identify existing bills that we believe can easily accommodate our
proposed language.

I hope that the information is useful.  Please do not hesitate to contact me
if you would like to discuss these materials further, or if there is anything
else that I can do to assist you.

Regards,
Ken

Contact Information to Discuss Interest Expressed by Native American Tribes
in Installing Small-scale Generation on Tribal Lands

David Parquet, Vice-President
Enron North America
101 California Street, Suite 1950
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: 415.782.7820
Fax: 415.782.7851

2. Key Barriers to Distributed Generation

Excessive and Unnecessary Utility Stand-by Charges

Solution: The executive orders issued by the Governor on February 14th took a
step in the right direction.  Utility stand-by charges have always been
designed by the utilities to protect their monopoly position, extract
monopoly prices from customers, or both.  But there is no reason to limit the
elimination of these charges to generation facilities that are less than
1MW.  These limits will only lengthen unnecessarily the time it takes for
California to close the significant gap between supply and demand and reduce
the risk of black outs this summer.  We would propose lifting the cap by
offering amendments to SB27X, which is designed to facilitate development of
distributed generation.

Excessive delays and costs related to interconnecting facilities with
investor-owned and municipal utilities

Solution:   The Governor,s executive order regarding interconnection is a
step in the right direction*D-D-26-01 requires utilities to complete
interconnection studies within 7 days.  California should ensure that this
requirement applies to all generation facilities, including distributed
generation.  In addition, the financial conflicts the utilities face when
interconnecting generation facilities are simply too powerful to overcome
through executive orders or other regulations.  To the greatest extent
possible, California should shift control over interconnection away from the
utility and place that control with the California ISO.  This could be
accomplished through amendments to SB 27X.

Permitting and Air Quality Issues
Developers of distributed (i.e., &on-site8) generation that is 50 MWs or
greater must receive certification from the California Energy Commission and
therefore face all of the impediments to development that large-scale
generation faces.

Solution: California should ensure that the executive orders (D-22-01 thru
D-26-01) issued by the Governor to expedite plant siting and maximize plant
output apply equally to smaller scale, &distributed generation8 facilities.
In addition, distributed generation that is less than 50 MWs continues to
face local opposition.  The State should ensure that local, parochial
interests cannot block otherwise beneficial distributed generation projects.
These objectives could be accomplished through amendments to SB27X.

3. Credit Concerns Regarding Authority Granted to DWR in AB1X to Purchase
Electricity on Behalf of the Utilities

Enron responded to the RFP issued by DWR to enter into power contracts with
suppliers.
Enron is in active discussions with DWR to establish contract terms with the
goal of entering into a power purchase agreement as soon as possible.
However, ambiguities contained in AB1X have created significant credit risk
concerns that need to be resolved in order to finalize contract terms.
We understand that the lion,s share of counterparties share Enron,s credit
risk concerns.
Enron has proposed several options for resolving the credit risk issues and
is working with DWR to arrive at a solution that is mutually agreeable to
both sides and that might serve as a template for power purchase agreements
going forward.

Summary of the Source of the Credit Risk Issue

Ambiguous Ratemaking Authority
The language in AB1X is ambiguous as to whether DWR has any authority to
charge California ratepayers for the costs of purchasing power.  From our
analysis of the bill, the language in AB1X appears to leave intact the
California PUC,s exclusive jurisdiction over ratemaking in California.  As
such, suppliers have no assurance that the PUC will agree to include in rates
adequate charges to cover DWR,s costs of power purchases.

Ambiguous Regulatory Authority Regarding Contract &Prudence8
The language in AB1X leaves open the possibility that the California Public
Utilities Commission could determine that power purchases made by DWR are
&imprudent.8  On the basis of such a finding, the CPUC could then refuse to
allow DWR to collect from ratepayers the costs associated with its power
purchases.  Consequently, suppliers have no assurance that the PUC will agree
to include in rates the charges to cover the costs of power contracts that
DWR has entered into with suppliers.

Ambiguous Language Regarding the Ratemaking Mechanism that Will Be Used to
Recover DWR,s Costs of Power Purchases
In addition to the ambiguity regarding ratemaking and regulatory authority
noted above, the language in the bill is equally ambiguous with respect to
the specific ratemaking &mechanics8 that AB1X directs the PUC to employ to
permit DWR to recover its power purchase costs. Based on our analysis, it is
extremely difficult to determine how the PUC would design the rates to ensure
DWR recovers its power purchase costs.  Moreover, as currently drafted, it is
difficult to determine whether AB1X would even permit the PUC to include in
rates all of the charges necessary to fully recover DWR,s power purchase
costs.  Again, this ambiguity raises significant credit risk concerns since
suppliers have little assurance that DWR will have the ability to recover
from ratepayers the costs of purchasing power.

Options to Resolve Concerns Regarding Credit Risk

We have been working diligently with DWR officials to resolve the credit risk
issues.  We have identified three options:

Amend AB1X
The amendments, which are attached to this email, would clarify that a) the
PUC would accept as &prudent and reasonable8 all purchase costs incurred by
DWR, and b) the PUC is obligated to include in rates the charges necessary to
ensure that DWR fully recovers its costs of power purchases.  This is the
preferred option, though we understand that the there may be some political
challenges standing in the way of amending AB1X.  (See attached file
entitled, &AmendAB1X.doc8.)

Clarify the Ambiguities in AB1X through an Order Issued by the PUC, and
through Contract Language
This is the option that we are currently working with DWR officials to
implement.  However, it is more complicated and could take significantly more
time to implement than the "legislative" fix.  We have attached electronic
copies of the talking points related to the order that the California PUC
would need to issue under this option.  (See attached file entitled,
&cpuctalkingpoints.doc.8)

Make Use of Other Instruments Designed to Address Credit Risk
As indicated in our letter responding to DWR,s RFP, we are willing to accept
other forms of credit from DWR.  Those options include a letter of credit,
cash prepayment, or an acceptable form of collateral.  DWR officials have
indicated to us that DWR prefers to pursue the second options. That is, DWR
prefers to clarify the ambiguities in AB1X through a PUC order and through
contract amendments.

4. California,s Supply-demand Picture Heading into Summer 2001

Both the California Energy Commission and Cambridge Energy Research
Associates (CERA), a private sector energy think tank, have issued reports
showing that California faces a severe supply-demand imbalance.  They differ
only on how much and how soon additional supply will be made available.  All
credible sources agree that supply will be very tight throughout the Summer
of 2001 and that unless a solution is found immediately, blackouts are
likely.

CEC and CERA both forecast that California will be short of supply this
summer by approximately 5,000 MW.   These numbers are in line with our
estimates.  California,s supply base currently has a 6% capacity margin, well
below the average 15-20%, which is recommended for reliable system operation
in the West.  Since the West relies more heavily upon hydroelectric power
than other regions, reserves are particularly important, owing to the
unpredictability of the weather and the dry year the West has experienced to
date. In the event of a low rain and snow period, the system must possess the
flexibility to respond to the reduced availability of power supply.
California,s very low reserve margin makes it especially susceptible to this
requirement.

Other reasons for reduced supply for the Summer of 2001 include the early
draw-down of reservoirs in the continual effort to manage California's severe
supply-demand gap; emissions restrictions on existing plants; and a reduced
number of customers who can be curtailed under their contracts with the
utilities.  Cambridge Energy Research Associates asserts that at the current
pace of siting, permitting and construction, adequate supplies will not be
added to correct the market imbalance until 2003 at the earliest.

CERA predicts that California is likely to face approximately 20 hours of
rolling black outs this summer.  The CEC paints a considerably more
optimistic scenario, betting that California will bring an additional 5,000
MWs on line to meet peaking summer demand.  It is our view that California
should view the CEC's "rosy scenario" with considerable skepticism.

5. Suggested Package of Legislative Proposals Designed to Solve California,s
Electricity Crisis

This email offers an overview of our proposed legislative solution.  We will
deliver to your office tomorrow specific legislative language and existing
bills that we believe can accommodate our proposals.

As we have suggested throughout the crisis, any solution to California's
crisis must focus on four issues:

Increase supply
Decrease demand
Establish a truly competitive retail electricity market
Return California,s Investor-owned utilities to solvency

Increase supply--Legislative vehicle: SB28X (Sher)
To site and construct a power plant in Texas takes approximately 2 years.
Enron and others have completed the entire process in other states in less
than a year.  In California, it takes about six years, or longer.

The Governor,s executive orders and Senator Sher,s siting reform legislation
are steps in the right direction.  Our suggested amendments can improve those
efforts by further addressing the difficulties that project developers face
in securing air emission reduction credits to meet the air permit
requirements included in the CEC's certification requirements.  Enron,s
proposal seeks to streamline the process for 1) obtaining credits and 2)
transfering credits between air districts.  In addition, it creates an
innovative emissions reduction bank to allow project sponsors to fund
emissions in advance of obtaining certification, and permits the affected air
districts to use those funds to finance projects that will produce the
required reductions in pollution emissions.

Decrease demand*Legislative Vehicle:   AB31X (Wright)
Because of the delay in getting a solution in place in California, closing
the supply-demand gap through energy conservation and efficiency offers the
best chance of avoiding blackouts this summer.  This can be accomplished most
effectively and quickly in two ways:

Buy-down demand
California is tapping into an enormous amount of money from the General Fund
to finance DWR,s power purchases.  California could likely reduce demand more
economically by running an auction to determine the payments businesses would
be willing to receive to reduce their demand for a sustained period (e.g.,
through the summer months).  DWR could easily run an on-line auction to
determine the price it could pay for these demand reductions.  To
participate, businesses would be required to have the metering equipment
necessary to monitor and verify that they are actually achieving the
reductions.  Enron has developed an on-line auction software package, &Deal
Bench,8 that it would be willing to contribute to the effort.

Use Price Signals to Incent Voluntary Curtailment
To be successful, customers need access to the following key elements:

An internet based hour-ahead price posting system to track the market price
for hour-ahead power in real time.
Real-time metering systems for baseline demand and voluntarily curtailment
verification.
Settlement process that allows for market clearing prices of energy to be
paid for load reduction (&Negawatts8).

The potential benefits of an effective demand response program would include:

&creation8 of additional summer peaking capacity in California, particularly
in the short term, without requiring construction of additional generation
resources.
reduction of  peak or super-peak load on the over-stressed California
electric system, thus potentially reducing the overall cost of electricity in
the state.
fostering of demand elasticity without subjecting customers to the full risk
of hourly market price volatility by passing market price signals to
customers and allowing them to voluntarily shed load and be compensated for
responding.

We estimate that we could generate a summer 2001 on-peak demand response in
excess of 400 MW during certain high cost hours, and a demand response for
summer 2002 on-peak hours that could exceed 1000 MW.  We further estimate
that the market response to this program from all ESPs could be 2 to 3 times
that amount.  We recommend that the State of California provide rebates
directly to customers to fund the installation of advanced metering and
control systems that would support load curtailment implementation.

Establish a truly competitive retail electricity market*Legislative vehicle:
SB27X
The only customers who were protected from price volatility in San Diego were
customers who chose Direct Access and signed fixed price deals with energy
service providers.  Ironically, AB1X takes that important option away from
customers and businesses.  It is critical that AB1X be amended to remove the
prohibition against Direct Access.

Enron's legislative proposal would give customers freedom to enter into a
direct access transaction, while simultaneously addressing the Department of
Water Resources' concerns about stranded power costs that might result from
customer migration.

In addition, California will only achieve a competitive retail market when
the utility is removed completely from the procurement function.  Procurement
is not a utility core competency, as evidenced by the dire financial
condition in which the utilities now find themselves.  California should
therefore begin immediately to phase the utility out of the procurement
function entirely, with the goal of having all customers served by a
non-utility provider within 36 months.  To execute the transition, California
should hold a series of competitive solicitations over the 36-month period in
which competing service providers would bid for the right to serve segments
of utility load.

Return California,s Investor-owned utilities to solvency*Legislative vehicle:
AB18X
Utility bankruptcy will not increase supply and it will not decrease demand.
In short, bankruptcy does nothing to solve California,s supply-demand
imbalance.  In addition, bankruptcy increases the likelihood that consumers
and businesses will bear the significant financial risks of having California
State government assume the role of &electricity buyer8 for an extended
period of time.  Finally, bankruptcy will undermine both investor confidence
in California's energy markets and the private sector's willingness to
participate in that market.

California can return the utilities to financial solvency by implementing a
series of staged rate increases.  California should design those rate
increases with the dual goal of returning the utilities to solvency without
&shocking8 the economy or household budgets For example, California could
amortize the recovery of the utilities, past debt over a 5-10 year period.
In addition, the magnitude of the rate increase can be reduced in two ways:
First, the utilities could absorb some portion of their existing debt in
recognition of the risk they accepted when they agreed to the structure of AB
1890.  Second, California can &net8 the revenues the utilities have received
from selling electricity into the Power Exchange against the debts they have
accrued due to the retail price cap.


what time the game tomorrow?


...okay, maybe it's not THAT good but it's cooked and the beer is plentiful.

Hey everyone,

Just wanted to test the waters and see what kind of interest there was in
doing Steak Night tomorrow night at Little Woodrows.  I feel like it's been a
while since we really rallied the troops and I know I have personally missed
the interaction.  It's also been a while since we've attempted to solve the
worlds problems over cold Shiner and I think the world may be the worse for
it.  So, get back to me and let me know if anyone's up for an evening of
eating, drinking and most definitely being merry.  If it looks like 'a go',
I'll shoot everyone a follow-up email complete with ETA.

The one and only,

sscott5

"If we could just get everyone to close their eyes and visualize world peace
for an hour, imagine how serene and quiet it would be until the looting
started."


One point you were checking was the CA.  Any luck?

I called pulled off track on a couple of things, but I can get back to this
now.  Billy Fleenor says he has some thoughts on structure from a M-to-M
standpoint.  Are you guys interested in having that conversation at this time?

Kay

From: William Keeney/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/21/2001 01:18 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: NRG bullet points

Kay:

Any progress on drafting a letter of intent, or are you still waiting on
feedback from the team?

Just let me know.  Thanks!
Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 9:20 AM
To: Manis, Herman; Fleenor, William
Cc: May, Tom; Keeney, William; Marks, David; Scheuer, Janelle
Subject: Re: NRG bullet points

Herman/Billy,

This is still very early in the process, but some thought as to structure
options for earning recognition might be worthwhile.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/17/2001 09:17
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
05/16/2001 12:36 PM
To: William Keeney/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Marks/ENRON@enronXgate, Janelle
Scheuer/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Re: NRG bullet points   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

I've made some revisions the Bill's document to make sure we are on the same
page before I prepare the LOI.

 << File: NRG Term Sheet.doc >>

Do we want to give any sort of description of how the benchmark will be set?
Do we want to mention the cancellation provisions?

Thanks,

Kay


/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/
Wall of Champs Is Up!   If you've made your playoffs or won your league, let
the world know about it.   We've got our Wall of Champs up and running and
waiting for you.   Check it out here  http://footballguys.com/wall2001.cfm
You can add your team here http://footballguys.com/addwall.cfm   There's not
much better than flaunting your success in front of your league members...
Enjoy.
/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Hi Folks,

Doing our best to get these to you early in the week as you juggle your
lineups for this final week 17.   Here's how I see the Rushing Game Matchups
this week.

PLEASE NOTE:   See the cheatsheet online www.footballguys.com for exactly
where I rank players and to determine who to start.   I always receive
emails asking me how I can have a guy ranked highly on the cheatsheet but
listed under a matchup that favors the Defense.   Just because one matchup
may be more favorable than another, that doesn't necessarily mean I'd start
the player with the best matchup.   Ahman Green may have a horrible matchup
one week but unless you're sitting on Ricky Williams or Marshall Faulk,
Green's your guy no matter who he's lining up against.  (Yes, even after
last week's performance)  The matchup info is meant to be just one more tool
in your box when it comes to deciding between players.

Stats are provided by Mike Hall's excellent FLM League Management Software.
http://www.fflm.com/ for more info.   Fantasy Points Allowed by position
numbers are from ESPN.com.   Target numbers are from our Footballguy Andy
Hicks.
Let's get to it.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Locks:  These games feature Defenses that have struggled lately.

Baltimore's Terry Allen vs Minnesota Defense

Terry Allen ran hard last week where he rushed 20 times for 74 yards (3.3
ypc) against a tough Buc team.   It'll be much easier this week against the
swiss cheese Vikings ranked # 30 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the
last 4 weeks.   Although, these Vikings did shut down Ahman Green last week.
For the year, they rank # 31 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Denver's Terrell Davis vs Indianapolis Defense

Terrell Davis looked good again rushing for 89 yards on 18 carries (4.9 ypc)
It's been a tough year and you can bet he'll want to finish strong.   The
Colts rank # 23 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.
For the year, they rank # 29 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

New England's Antowain Smith vs Carolina Defense

A rested Antowain Smith faces the soft Carolina defense that's ranked # 31
in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year,
they rank # 20 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   Great matchup.

Pittsburgh's Chris Fuamatu-Ma'afala / Jerome Bettis vs Cleveland Defense

Fuamatu-Ma'afala was a workhorse on the ground Sunday but didn't have a lot
to show for it.   He ran 25 times for 55 yards (2.2 ypc)   He did score on a
receiving TD.   He'll face a weak Cleveland defense ranked # 29 in Rushing
Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 20
in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Washington's Stephen Davis vs Arizona Defense

Stephen Davis looked great rushing for 111 yards on 21 carries (5.3 ypc) and
the score.   He left with a knee tweak but it doesn't look to be serious.
Ki-Jana Carter played great after Davis left.   The Cardinals rank # 21 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they
rank # 22 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Prime Matchups:  These games feature Defenses that haven't been strong
lately.

Buffalo's Shawn Bryson / Travis Henry / Sammy Morris vs Miami Defense

Bryson ran wild again rushing 28 times for 107 yards (3.8 ypc).   Sammy
Morris spelled him for a few carries and looked good too but it seems Bryson
is clearly the man here.   It's possible Henry could see action so keep an
eye on this one through the week.   The Dolphins have fallen down to # 28 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they
rank # 17 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Dallas' Emmitt Smith vs Detroit Defense

Emmitt looked very solid again rushing for 126 yards on 26 carries (4.8 ypc)
although he failed to score.   He needs a little over 60 yards to get 1,000
for the season so you can bet he'll be gunning for that.   The Lions rank #
18 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 24 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

New York Giants' Tiki Barber / Ron Dayne vs Green Bay Defense

Barber saw more action with 16 carries and 71 yards (4.4 ypc) but it was
Dayne who scored with 59 yards on 8 carries (7.4 ypc)   Barber was very
active again in the passing game.   The Packers let Michael Bennett run well
Sunday and have slipped to # 27 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the
last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 13 in Fantasy Points Allowed to
RBs.

New York Jet's Curtis Martin vs Oakland Defense

Martin put in another Martin Like day with 115 yards on 19 carries (6.1 ypc)
The Jets may have problems, but Martin isn't one.   He'll face an Oakland
defense ranked # 19 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.
For the year, they rank # 21 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Oakland's Charlie Garner vs New York Jets Defense

The Raiders don't look nearly as strong as they did.   Garner only had 9
carries Sunday for 23 yards (2.6 ypc)   Tyrone Wheatley only had 5 carries.
This week they've got a nice matchup as they'll face the Jets ranked # 26 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they
rank # 27 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Seattle's Shaun Alexander vs Kansas City Defense

Alexander didn't do much Sunday rushing 23 times for 59 yards (2.6 ypc)   He
'll be ok though and gets to face a Chief defense ranked # 22 in Rushing
Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 23
in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

St. Louis' Marshall Faulk vs Atlanta Defense

Start Faulk.   The question will be of course how much he plays but it was
pretty obvious Sunday that Mike Martz lets his guys play.   Trung Canidate
could have really used the work but he warmed the bench while Faulk went
nuts.   I'd say you'll get at least a half, maybe much more out of Faulk and
half of Faulk is worth more than most backs.   The Falcons rank # 24 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 28 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Even Matchups:  These games feature no real advantage either way

Arizona's Michael Pittman vs Washington Defense

Just when it looked like Michael Pittman was going to take over the clear
cut # 1 RB role, Thomas Jones steps in with 16 carries.   Pittman rushed 12
times for 89 yards (7.4 ypc) which was bolstered by a 39 yarder.   Jones ran
for 69 yards on 16 carries (4.3 ypc)   This was Carolina, though.   This
week will feature a tougher test with Washington ranked # 8 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they've been pretty
soft though and rank # 25 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Kansas City's Priest Holmes / Tony Richardson vs Seattle Defense

Priest Holmes ran 27 times for 91 yards (3.4 ypc) plus the score.   Tony
Richardson didn't have a carry.   This week, he'll face the Seahawks ranked
# 12 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the
year, they rank # 14 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Miami's Lamar Smith / Travis Minor vs Buffalo Defense

This is getting embarrassing.   Smith rushed 7 times for 4 yards (0.6 ypc)
Travis Minor had 33 yards on 9 carries (3.7 ypc)   He's becoming less and
less of a factor with each game.   The Dolphins are in the playoffs but find
themselves playing a different style of ball than they have been.   Minor's
a threat to go long on the screen passes and Smith is a long shot for a
cheap TD.   They'll face the Bills ranked # 13 in Rushing Yards Allowed per
Game over the last 4 weeks and # 26 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Minnesota's Michael Bennett vs Baltimore Defense

We said Bennett just needed carries and he got them Sunday rushing 25 times
for 104 yards (4.2 ypc)   He'll face a Baltimore defense that's numbers don'
t back up it's reputation this week - they rank # 25 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 2 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

New Orleans' Ricky Williams vs San Francisco Defense

Even though he didn't score, it was a better performance by Williams who
rushed 17 times for 74 yards (4.4 ypc)   The Saints clearly want him to be
more involved as he was Sunday.   This week, he'll face a 49er defense
ranked # 17 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 18
in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

San Francisco's Garrison Hearst vs New Orleans Defense

Garrison Hearst was a non factor Sunday with just 35 yards on 11 carries
(3.2 ypc)   Kevan Barlow didn't do much either so it wasn't like he lost
time to another player.   This week, he gets the Saints who rank # 15 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they
rank # 19 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Tampa Bay's Warrick Dunn / Mike Alstott vs Philadelphia Defense

Tampa's One-Two punch continues to work.   Alstott had 80 yards on 14
carries (5.7 ypc) and Dunn carried the ball 13 times for 47 yards (3.6 ypc)
Alstott's been more effective on the ground but Dunn seems to be more
involved in the passing game.   This week, they'll face an Eagle defense
ranked # 20 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 9
in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Downside Matchups:  These games feature a Defense that's been pretty strong
lately.

Cincinnati's Corey Dillon vs Tennessee Defense

Dillon showed again he can run on any defense.   He had 91 yards on 21
carries (4.3 ypc) against the Steelers.   He'll face the Titans this week
ranked # 6 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks so it won
't get much easier.   They rank # 15 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Detroit's Lamont Warren / James Stewart vs Dallas Defense

The Detroit RBs were horrible on the ground in this one with Lamont Warren
gaining 19 yards on 6 carries (3.2 ypc).   Cory Schlesinger did catch 11
passes though so maybe he's worth a longshot pick there.   The Cowboys rank
# 14 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 12 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Green Bay's Ahman Green vs New York Giants Defense

Green was shut down on the ground with just 31 yards on 16 carries (1.9 ypc)
although he did score.   Go figure.   He's still too good to sit in my
opinion.   This week, he'll face the Giants ranked # 10 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 3 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs so it's a tough matchup, although I think I'd
start Green unless you really have a solid alternative.

Indianapolis' Dominic Rhodes vs Denver Defense

Again, Dominic Rhodes looked excellent rushing for 83 yards on 20 carries
(4.2 ypc) with a score.   He'll face the Broncos this week ranked # 7 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they
rank # 4 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   The Broncos are definitely
surging after the win in Oakland but I still like Rhodes.

Jacksonville's Stacey Mack vs Chicago Defense

Mack went off last week with 125 yards on 16 carries (7.8 ypc) and a score.
It'll be tougher this week against Chicago that ranks # 9 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 10 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Philadelphia's Duce Staley vs Tampa Bay Defense

Staley's receiving numbers had been carrying him lately and this week he
paid the price.   He only rushed 8 times for 23 yards (2.9 ypc) and was shut
 down receiving with just 2 receptions for -1 yards.   This week, he'll face
a surging Buc defense ranked # 16 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the
last 4 weeks and # 11 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Tennessee's Eddie George vs Cincinnati Defense

Eddie George looked the old Eddie Sunday with 130 yards on 26 carries (5.0
ypc)   Plus 2 scores.  This week he'll face a Bengal defense ranked # 11 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they
rank # 7 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Defensive Slam Dunks:  These games feature a Defense that's been very strong
lately.

Atlanta's Maurice Smith vs St. Louis Defense

Again, Maurice Smith ran poorly but got a cheap TD.   He managed just 38
yards on 15 carries (2.5 ypc).   Bob Christian stole 10 carries where he
gained 33 yards (3.3 ypc)   They're both a gamble against a tough Ram
defense ranked # 3 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.
For the year, they rank # 5 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Carolina's Richard Huntley vs New England Defense

Huntley ran pretty well last week gaining 62 yards on 12 carries (5.2 ypc).
He just didn't get enough carries for this awful Carolina team.   That won't
get any better this week agains the Patriots ranked # 2 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 16 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Chicago's Anthony Thomas vs Jacksonville Defense

Thomas ran 25 times for 76 yards (3.0 ypc) Sunday.   He'll face a tougher
defense in Jacksonville that's been awesome lately ranking # 1 in Rushing
Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 8
in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   Thomas is still probably a starter in
most leagues, but the Jaguars have been extremely stingy of late.

Cleveland's Jamel White vs Pittsburgh Defense

White only had 42 yards on 21 carries (2.0 ypc) but did score twice.   Corey
Dillon showed the Steeler defense wasn't perfect last week.  They're still
tough though ranked # 4 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4
weeks.   For the year, they rank # 1 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

That'll do it for the Rushing Matchups.   Passing Matchups to follow.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Bryant Analytics, Inc.   All Rights Reserved 1999-2001

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


damn  - we eat really early here - they bring lunch at 11 oclock if you can
believe it.  maybe i will come meet you anyway and not eat - it's dead here
today.  when and where were you planning on going??


Peggy,

Pursuant to our telephone conversation attached is the letter from Edward McKenna, ISO-NE, and a copy of the Protocal for the Initiation of Membership Termination Proceedings.

Richard

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pitre, Becky
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	FW: Termination Proceedings
Importance:	High

---------------------- Forwarded by Becky Pitre/HOU/EES on 10/23/2001 03:26 PM ---------------------------

"Garrity, Vicki" <vgarrity@iso-ne.com> on 10/23/2001 03:06:05 PM
To:	becky.pitre@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	FW: Termination Proceedings

Resending this - original e-mail came back with address error.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Garrity, Vicki
> Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 8:07 AM
> To:	Fowler, Leonard - NGRID
> Cc:	Allegretti, Daniel - ENRON; Hoatson, Thomas - ENRON; Belval, Paul -
> DBH; Bacon, Roger - MMWEC; Gerity, Patrick - DB&H; Doot, David - DBH;
> 'Becky_Pitre@EES.enron.net'; A. Ignatius (E-mail); Bekker, Michael -
> Wisvest CT, LLC; Biewlad, Bruce - Synapse Energy Economics; Bilus,
> Benjamin - Preti, Flaherty, Beliveau, Pachios & Haley; Bowie, Cal - Select
> Energy , Inc.; Cavanaugh, David; Fernandez, Robert - Sithe New England
> Holdings LLC; Fuller, Peter - Mirant New England, LLC; Hashem, Julie -
> State of Maine, Office of the Governor; Krawczyk, Paul - NSTAR; Liepe,
> Paul; Lynch, Michael- MMWEC; Schaefer, Marc - SESCO; Short, William -
> Indeck Maine Energy. L.L.C.; Sipe, Donald - Forster, Inc.; Smith, Debra;
> Smith, Hariph - Central Maine Power; Smith, Philip - USGen/PG&E Gen.;
> Taylor, Bill - TCPM; Zucco, Barbara
> Subject:	Termination Proceedings
>
> Please see the attached letter
>
>  <<Enron Energy Service 10-19-01.doc>>  <<Membership Termination
> Protocols. As approved by NPC on  April 6 2001.DOC>>

 - Enron Energy Service 10-19-01.doc
 - Membership Termination Protocols. As approved by NPC on  April 6 2001.DOC

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Dan Pribble's next Director Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, February 21st in ECN45C2.  (7:00AM - ? pm)

	Below are some proposed agenda items:
		Barney Brasher - Financial Review
		Don Hawkins/Charlie Thompson - Objectives
		Max Brown - Pipeline Integrity follow-up
		Larry Urban - Safety Workshop Feedback, Objectives, Mega Safety Awards, Safety-PPE's, Public Awareness

	Please respond to this email and let me know how much time you need for your agenda item and/or other agenda items you wish to discuss.

	Thanks!

         Melinda Gallishaw
           Enron Transportation Services
         Southwest Operations
         Loc:  ECN4517
         Tel:   713-853-7688
         Fax:  713-646-4808
  melinda.gallishaw@enron.com


Dear Mr. LARRY CAMPBELL:

The following option contract(s) in your account  have expired:

100  JNPR     May   80.00000  call

If you have any questions please send an e-mail to support@datek.com or call
Customer Support 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at 1-800-U2-DATEK.

Tracking # W00110253294


The Associates PRC was completed on Monday, July 24.  As the PRC rep, I will
communicate the final ranking from the PRC process to your supervisor.  I
received a copy of the rankings from Charlene on Friday while I was on
vacation.  I will be communicating the final rankings to each Associate's
supervisor today.  It is your supervisor who will the one be to give you your
performance review and the ranking.  In your case, I would guess that Jean
and your new supervisor will have to work out which one (or both) will do
your review.  --Sally

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jean Mrha/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: PRC Feedback

Sally,

I don't know whether you or Jean (or Paul?) should be doing the feedback
meeting.  If you will be doing it, please respond with your earliest
availability to conduct that meeting.  I am fairly open currently except for
3pm-4pm Mon-Thurs.

Thanks,

Grant W. Zimmerman
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-6210
Fax:  (713) 646-8795


Susan, Matt

We have a test version of PortCalc and Deal Entry for performing Gas X Gas
spread calculations. Please let me know of your availability for running test
calcs.

Regards,
Marcelo


I'm still waiting for Davis' office to call.  The plan currently is for me to
talk to him when and if he calls.  Sandi has been in touch with the
governor's office.

By the way, thanks for the summary of the California proceedings.  I talked
to Hebert yesterday and he was duly impressed with your remarks ... I had to
remind him that you worked on the right answers for California, not the
abomination that's in place today.

Jeff Dasovich@EES
09/13/2000 06:48 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Skilling Get Davis Straightened Out?


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT on 01/04/2000 01:26
PM ---------------------------

"Michael McDermott" <mjmcdermott@hotmail.com> on 01/04/2000 10:12:20 AM
To: Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT@ECT, robasaurusrex@hotmail.com,
lrmassiah@hotmail.com, bhmoody@hotmail.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: Fw: Is there a theme?

----Original Message Follows----
From: Blaine Williamson <bwilliamson@oebi.com>
To: "'mjmcdermott@hotmail.com'" <mjmcdermott@hotmail.com>
Subject: FW: Fw: Is there a theme?
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 09:33:03 -0700

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.weninger@weatherford.com
[mailto:mike.weninger@weatherford.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 1999 11:35 AM
To: bwilliamson@oebi.com
Subject: FW: Fw: Is there a theme?

-----Original Message-----
From: Rodney Lutz [mailto:rdltzaec@telusplanet.net]
Sent: December 22, 1999 11:16 PM
To: Chiplake
Subject: Fw: Fw: Is there a theme?

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

 - nothing to wear.jpg
 - not worthy.jpg
 - no no.jpg
 - pet my puppy.jpg
 - swallow.jpg
 - twice a day.jpg


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2000
01:35 PM ---------------------------

service@strong-funds.com on 01/31/2000 12:57:57 AM
Please respond to service@strong-funds.com
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Thank You For Your Recent Interest In Strong Funds

Dear Investor:

Thank you for your recent interest in Strong Investments. If you have
already sent in your application, you should receive a confirmation of
your investment shortly.

If you have further questions about our products and services, please
visit our web site, eStrong.com at http://www.estrong.com or send us an
e-mail at the following link:
http://www.estrong.com/strong/Services98/contact/email.htm

If you prefer, you can contact a Strong Representative 24 hours a day,
7 days a week  at 1-800-359-3379.

Here are some links that you may find helpful:

Best Performing Funds:
Many of our funds have received the industry's top rankings. To view
these funds and those that have outperformed the S&P 500 Index, click
on the following link:
http://www.estrong.com/strong/perl/email.pl?11410,/strong/Our_Funds/45star.htm

StrongOne Brokerage Account:
StrongOne allows to you consolidate all of your holdings into one
convenient portfolio. To learn more about the products and services
that make StrongOne the best choice for your stock, bond, and fund
investments, click on the following link:
http://www.estrong.com/strong/perl/email.pl?11410,/strong/strongone/aboutindex
.htm

Interactive Tools & Calculators:
http://www.estrong.com/strong/perl/email.pl?11410,/strong/Interactive98/index.
htm

Strong Funds Prospectuses & On-line Application:
http://www.estrong.com/strong/perl/email.pl?11410,/strong/orderform.htm

Once again, we appreciate your consideration of Strong Investments, and
we look forward to helping you pursue your financial goals.

Sincerely,

Byron C. Vielehr
Strong Investments
www.eStrong.com

Strong Investments, Inc.
11624E99

***************************
If you prefer not to receive e-mail updates from Strong Funds in the
future, please follow this link:
http://www.strong-funds.com/strong/Services98/contact/unsub_change.htm?sshackl
@enron.com


GE form contract, 1 1/2 hours.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 09/05/2000 10:46 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Meeting you requested for today

What is the meeting regarding and how much time do you need?


It looks good. By the way, we have had dealings with Carter Mathes before.

	Gerald Nemec
	08/31/2000 01:40 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Wildhorse Letter

Any comments you may have would be appreciated.  I need to get this out by
tommorrow.  Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000 01:39 PM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	08/31/2000 12:15 PM

		 To: Dan J Bump/DEN/ECT@Enron, kckrisa@apex2000.net, Mark Whitt@ECT,
ccarver@alfers-carver.com
		 cc: Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Teresa G
Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Arvel Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara Gray
		 Subject: Wildhorse Letter

Attached is a letter to Wildhorse concerning curtailment of the Dakota
Production.  Please review and provide comments asap.


The deals below were changed tonight per John Arnold.

Thanks,

Errol McLaughlin

Gregory Carraway
01/16/2001 08:50 AM
To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Gas Daily deals in dispute

The following deals are being disputed by Reliant Energy Services. TAGG is
showing these deals as Gas Daily, but the counterparty states that they
should be changed to Nymex trades. They also stated that they were told by
Mike Maggi that the deals would be changed to Nymex deals:


Julie,

The introduction looks fine. I have made some cosmetic changes
(typos and split infinitives that slipped by). You can safely ignore most of
them.
English is not even my second language.

The corrections are in pink.

Vince

"Julie" <julie@lacima.co.uk> on 08/01/2000 07:43:10 AM
To: "VinceJKaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Preface for book

Vince,
?
Hope you are well.
?
We spoke a while ago about who should write the preface for the book, and
you kindly offered that you would provide this.? Is this still  possible?? We
realise that you are extremely busy, so Chris and Les went  ahead and wrote
something, which is below, and if you want to review, change or  re-write?the
preface, that would be very appreciated.? Let me know  what your thoughts are.
?
Thanks,
Julie
(we're getting close)
?
?

Preface

?

?

?

One of our main objectives in  writing Energy Derivatives: Pricing and Risk
Management has been to bring  together as many of the various approaches for
the pricing and risk management  energy derivatives as possible, to discuss
in-depth the models, and to show how  they relate to each other.? In this
way we hope to help the reader to analyse the different models, price a wide
range of energy derivatives, or to build a risk management system which uses
a  consistent modelling framework.? We  believe that for practitioners this
last point is very important and we continue  to stress in our articles and
presentations the dangers of having flawed risk  management and giving
arbitrage opportunities to your competitors by using  ad-hoc and inconsistent
models for different instruments and markets (see also OTHERS WHO PROPOSE
CONSISTENT  MODELS?).? However, it is not  our wish to concentrate on one
particular model or models, at the exclusion of  the others because we
believe that the choice should rest with the user  (although it will probably
be clear from our discussions the model(s) we  prefer).? We therefore try and
give  as clear account as possible of the advantage and disadvantages of all
the  models so that the reader can make an informed choice as to the models
which  best suit their needs.

?

In order to meet our objectives the  book is divided into 11 chapters.?  In
chapter 1 we give an overview of the fundamental principals needed to  model
and price energy derivatives which will underpin the remainder of the  book.?
In addition to introducing  the techniques that underlie the Black-Scholes
modelling framework we outline  the numerical techniques of trinomial trees
and Monte Carlo simulation for  derivative pricing, which are used throughout
the book.

?

In Chapter 2 we discuss the  analysis of spot energy prices.? As  well as
analysing empirical price movements we propose a number of processes  that
can be used to model the prices.?  We look at the well-know process of
Geometric Brownian Motion as well as  mean reversion, stochastic volatility
and jump processes, discussing each and  showing how they can be simulated
and their parameters estimated.

?

Chapter 3, written by Vince  Kaminski, Grant Masson and Ronnie Chahal of
Enron Corp., discusses volatility  estimation in energy commodity markets.?
This chapter builds on the previous one.? It examines in detail the methods,
merits and pitfalls of the volatility estimation process assuming different
pricing models introduced in chapter 2.?  Examples from crude, gas, and
electricity markets are used to illustrate  the technical and interpretative
aspects of calculating volatility.

?

Chapter 4 examines forward curves  in the energy markets.? Although  such
curves are well understood and straight-forward in the most financial
markets, the difficulty of storage in many energy markets leads to less well
defined curves.? In this chapter we  describe forward price bounds for energy
prices and the building of forward  curves from market instruments.? We
outline the three main approaches which have been applied to building
forward  curves in energy markets; the arbitrage approach, the econometric
approach, and  deriving analytical values by modelling underlying stochastic
factors.

?

Chapter 5 presents an overview of  structures found in the energy derivative
markets and discusses their uses.? Examples of products analysed in this
chapter include a variety of swaps, caps, floors and collars, as well as
energy  swaptions, compound options, Asian options, barrier options, lookback
options,  and ladder options.

?

Chapter 6 investigates single and  multi-factor models of the energy spot
price and the pricing of some standard  energy derivatives.? Closed form
solutions for forward prices, forward volatilities, and European option
prices  both on the spot and forwards are derived and presented for all the
models in  this chapter including a three factor, stochastic convenience
yield and interest  rate model.

?

Chapter 7 shows how the prices of  path dependent and American style options
can be evaluated for the models in  Chapter 6.? Simulation schemes are
developed for the evaluation of European style options and applied to a
variety  of path dependent options.? In order  to price options which
incorporate early exercise opportunities, a trinomial  tree scheme is
developed.? This tree  is built to be consistent with the observed forward
curve and can be used to  price exotic as well as standard European and
American style options.

?

Chapter 8 describes a methodology  for valuing energy options based on
modelling the whole of the market observed  forward curve.? The approach
results  in a multi-factor model that is able to realistically capture the
evolution of a  wide range of energy forward curves.?  The user defined
volatility structures can be of an extremely general  form.? Closed-form
solutions are  developed for pricing standard European options, and efficient
Monte Carlo  schemes are presented for pricing exotic options.? The chapter
closes with a discussion of  the valuation of American style options.

?

Chapter 9 focuses on the risk  management of energy derivative positions.?
In this chapter we discuss the management of price risk for institutions
that trade options or other derivatives and who are then faced with the
problem  of managing the risk through time.?  We begin with delta hedging a
portfolio containing derivatives and look  at extensions to gamma hedging )
illustrating the techniques using both spot and  forward curve models.? The
general  model presented in Chapter 8 is ideally suited to multi-factor
hedging of a  portfolio of energy derivatives and this is also discussed.

?

Chapter 10 examines the key risk  management concept of Value at Risk (VaR)
applied to portfolios containing  energy derivative products.? After
discussing the concept of the measure, we look at how the key inputs
(volatilities, covariances, correlations, etc) can be estimated.? We then
compare the fours major  methodologies for computing VaR; Delta, Delta-gamma,
historical simulation and  Monte-Carlo simulation, applying each to the same
portfolio of energy  options.? In this chapter we also  look at testing the
VaR estimates for various underlying energy market  variables.

?

Finally, in Chapter 11 we review  modelling approaches to credit risk.?  We
look in detail at two quite different approaches, CreditMetrics (J. P. Morgan
(1997)) and  CreditRisk+ (Credit Suisse Financial  Products (1997)) for which
detailed information is publicly available.? Together these provide an
extensive set  of tools with which to measure credit risk.? We present
numerical examples of  applying these techniques to energy derivatives.

?
Before  we begin we stress that the models and methods we present in this
book are tools  which should be used with the benefit of an understanding of
how both the +tool,  and the market works.? The  techniques we describe are
certainly not &magic wands8 which can be waved at  data and risk management
problems to provide instant and perfect solutions.? To quote from the
RiskMetrics Technical  Document &( no amount of sophisticated analytics will
replace experience and  professional judgement in managing risk.8.?  However,
the right tools, correctly used make the job a lot  easier!


I can only think of the Storage Puts and the Desk Mgmt fee ($120,000) as
prudencies still out there.  Is there any others you might remember?

Dave


Elena,

Thanks.

Vince


Group,
Virginia is exactly correct on this point.  MAKE IT A HABIT!  The majority of
inadvertancy that we have contributed to (and there hasn't been that much)
has been a result of confusion on times and duration of trades.
Thanks,
Bill

---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT on 04/09/2001
05:42 PM ---------------------------

Virginia Thompson
04/09/2001 05:32 PM
To: Portland Shift
cc:

Subject: Purchases and Sales

Dear Real Timers,

As I have been having to pull tapes lately, I cannot stress enough the
importance of stating the hour for which you are trading when you make
deals.  It is imperative that you state (as often as possible) the hours that
you are trading for, and it is extremely helpful when you re-cap the sale at
the end of your trade!! :) please...

There may be deals that we are going to loose the dispute for because neither
trader (on either side) stated clearly what hour we were trading for. I'm
relying on you guys to help me collect 100% on all our trades.

Please see or e-mail me with any questions.

Thanks.

Virginia


Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

The CA ISO has received a number of calls from Market Participants asking to
review the confidential attachments to the CA ISO/EOB's March 1 motion
requested recently from FERC pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act
(request attached).  Market Participants argue that they require access to
the attachments in order to respond to the FOIA request.  The March 1 motion
requested confidential treatment for the attachments "although the ISO and
the EOB do not believe that confidential treatment is required under the ISO
Tariff" because they were nonetheless "concerned that release of the
information contained in the appendices at this time could adversely affect
the ngotiations currently underway between the State of California and the
generators".  Since these concerns exist, the CA ISO cannot release the
confidential appendices.  Attached however are the cover sheets to each
table which describe in detail what is contained in each table.  This
information should assist Market Participants interested in the matter to
prepare any response they may wish to submit to FERC.  Again, Market
Participants should not rely on the CA ISO to make their arguments for them.

Jeanne M. Sol?
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.

 - Tables.pdf
 - Swidler OEA.pdf


can you get leslie included in this conference call for thurs a.m.

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:19 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	Re: Regulatory / Commercial Focus Q3/Q4 2001

Sounds good.  You can reach me at 415.782.7822.  Because my schedule is a mess (thanks to the mess California has created), if you don't reach me on my office line, please try 415.505.6633.  Also, I think that it would be very useful to have Leslie Lawner on, since she's involved a lot in California gas matters, but it's your call.  Just let me know.

Best,
Jeff

	Barry Tycholiz/ENRON@enronXgate 07/17/2001 08:30 AM 	   To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Jane M Tholt/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike Grigsby/ENRON@enronXgate  cc: Jessica Presas/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: Regulatory / Commercial Focus Q3/Q4 2001

Jeff, for the meeting on Thurs a.m.  9:30 ( Houston Time ), we should keep our group to the list I have identified. I would like to start with a simple plan and work out from there. We are working towards an action plan for handling PUC issues ( from a commercial perspective) in california and other states, prior to anybody addressing the PUC we need agreement as to what it is we want to put forward.

We will call you on thurs a.m.  Can you please verify your contact phone number.

Thanks in advance.

Jessica, pls reserve a room.

BT


Contract


Hello Fellows. Just a quick note to my H-Town homeboys as it were. Any of
you float away in the floods? Putnam, I heard you had some damage, sorry to
hear about that. If any of you have brilliant ideas for a new and exciting
career for me to pursue, I'm all ears. This unemployment thing is getting a
bit old. Jay, if you have any advice on how to make the most of these days,
speak up. I like to learn from the masters. I'm going to a place called
Peter Luger's tonight for Susie's birthday. It's considered by some to be
the best steak you can buy in America. We'll see how it stacks up to P.J.'s.
Take it easy boys.

--Eric
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Larry May/Corp/Enron on 02/15/2001 02:12
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Frank Hayden                           02/15/2001 10:58 AM

To: Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rebecca
Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron, Nick
Paraschos/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Minal Dalia/HOU/EES@EES, Darin
Schmidt/NA/Enron@ENRON, Homan Amiry/LON/ECT@ECT, Christian
LeBroc/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Xochitl Figueroa/NA/Enron@Enron, Manfred
Roenz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sunil Dalal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bharat
Khanna/NA/Enron@Enron, LaCrecia Davenport/Corp/Enron@Enron, Naveen
Andrews/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ted
Murphy/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Pitt/EU/Enron@Enron, Chip
Schneider/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Larry May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wenyao Jia/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Vince's GARP Presentation

Please forward feel free to share this.  This was presented at the Houston
GARP meeting late last month.
Thanks
Frank


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/23/2001 06:48 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	03/23/2001 06:28 PM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald <Michael.McDonald@enron.com>,
David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick Johnson
<rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra McCubbin
<Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton
<Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>, Beverly Aden <beverly.aden@enron.com>, Bill Votaw
<bill.votaw@enron.com>, Carol Moffett <carol.moffett@enron.com>, Debora
Whitehead <debora.whitehead@enron.com>, Dennis Benevides
<dennis.benevides@enron.com>, Don Black <don.black@enron.com>,
"dblack@enron.com" <dblack@enron.com>, "emelvin@enron.com"
<emelvin@enron.com>, "ehughes2@enron.com" <ehughes2@enron.com>,
"gweiss@enron.com" <gweiss@enron.com>, "gsavage@enron.com"
<gsavage@enron.com>, "Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>,
"kgustafs@enron.com" <kgustafs@enron.com>, Mike D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>,
"sgahn@enron.com" <sgahn@enron.com>, "vsharp@enron.com" <vsharp@enron.com>,
"wcurry@enron.com" <wcurry@enron.com>, "William.S.Bradford@enron.com"
<William.S.Bradford@enron.com>, Leslie Lawner <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, John
Neslage <john.neslage@enron.com>, Ken Smith <ken@kdscommunications.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Edison

The following companies were granted a declaratory judgment from the
Imperial County Supreme Court to suspend deliveries of capacity and
energy to Edison, and to resell energy and capacity to other purchasers:

Salton Sea Power Generation
Fish Lake Power
Vulcan/BN Geothermal Power Company
Elmore, LP
Leathers, LP
Del Ranch, LP