fyi...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 11:16 AM
To:	Concannon, Ruth; Townsend, Judy; Lamadrid, Victor; Muhl, Gil; Superty, Robert; Calcagno, Suzanne; McMichael Jr., Ed; Smith, George F.; Pollan, Sylvia S.; Kinsey, Lisa; Luce, Laura; Shireman, Kristann; Miller, Stephanie; Lucci, Paul T.; Gay, Randall L.; Sullivan, Patti; Hodge, John; Tholt, Jane M.; Kuykendall, Tori; Mahmassani, Souad; South, Steven P.; Shively, Hunter S.; Grigsby, Mike; Neal, Scott; Gomez, Julie A.; Sullivan, Colleen
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Lawner, Leslie; Neustaedter, Robert
Subject:	New FERC Policy on Negotiated Rate Deals

This is an alert that FERC will be more critical in the future of negotiated rate deals.  The orders discussed below dealt with buyout provisions in negotiated rate deals that Tennessee, ANR and Columbia had done.  These provisions had previously been permitted as negotiated rates, but FERC has decided that there is "significant potential for undue discrimination" and the recourse rates do not provide an adequate alternative.   Thus, anything in a negotiated rate deal that is not strictly rate-related will most likely be subject to intense scrutiny.

FERC ADDS ANOTHER LAYER TO POLICY ON NEGOTIATED-RATE AUTHORITY

Acting on a series of contract-specific cases, FERC last week sharpened its policy on what is, and is
not, allowed under negotiated rates. In further defining its policy, the commission continued to lean
heavily on the "linchpin" of negotiated-rate authority - that a customer not willing or able to negotiate a
deal must always have the option of obtaining needed capacity under cost-based recourse rates.
During discussion of the orders, Chairman Pat Wood III said it was "important to keep in mind, as we
rush into the brave new world on the gas side," that "all customers must be treated on a nondiscriminatory
basis by pipelines." Last week's proclamation should be considered "a reaffirmation of that nondiscriminatory
trend," he asserted.
In representative language, the commission said it wants to ensure that parties "are clear about contracting
practices that we find unacceptable because they present a significant potential for undue discrimination and those
that we find acceptable because they can be permitted without substantial risk" of such unequal treatment.
FERC declared that a "key factor" in determining whether a negotiated provision is considered an
"appropriate material deviation" from a pipeline's filed tariff schedule is the extent to which recourse rates
provide "adequate alternatives" to other shippers.
In cases involving rates negotiated by ANR Pipeline Co. (GT01-25, RP99-301), Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Co. (RP96-312, et al.) and Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. (CP01-70), the commission ruled that the
buyout provisions are not allowed unless they are offered to all shippers as part of the pipelines' generally
available tariffs.
The provisions at issue allow customers to buy out or terminate their contract demand levels prior to
the end of the deals. While the commission previously has held that such provisions can be included in a
negotiated-rate package, "we have reconsidered that holding" because similar buyout opportunities are
not available to more traditional shippers operating under recourse rates, it said in the Tennessee order.
Where a customer is seeking service for a set contract term and quantity, recourse service provides an
"adequate alternative," the commission observed. "However, if the customer desires a special contract
demand reduction or early termination right not provided in the generally applicable tariff, the availability
of service at the recourse rate does not provide an adequate substitute, since recourse service would not
include any such provision." A shipper obtaining such a provision would be insulated from a certain
degree of risk, giving it "an advantage over recourse-rate shippers," the commission pointed out.
"A shipper's right to reduce, or terminate, its contract demand before the expiration of its contract is a
valuable right, since it can enable the shipper to avoid significant liability for future reservation charges,"
FERC said, adding that "such a valuable right must be granted in a not unduly discriminatory manner."
Requiring pipelines to file generally applicable tariff provisions setting forth the conditions under
which they will offer contract demand reduction rights "is the best means of assuring that those rights will
be negotiated" in a fair manner, FERC reasoned. Once approved, the tariff language "will require the
pipeline to grant similar rights to similarly situated customers."
Commissioner Linda Breathitt applauded the policy shift, characterizing it as a much-needed shot in
the arm for a program that had become "muddled." Through a "tortured line of cases," FERC's definitions
of allowable contracting practices were "obscured," Breathitt said in welcoming the new "common-sense"
approach. The "tug of war" that parties have engaged in over the past few years "really hasn't served our
objective of ensuring that nondiscriminatory rates and service" are available to all shippers, she said.


continental.com Specials for Elizabeth Sager
Wednesday, November 28, 2001
****************************************

AirTrain Newark Now Open

Fast, safe, and dependable direct train service from Newark Airport to midtown Manhattan in less than 30 minutes.

Visit continental.com at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%289zsve%7E%7Dzkw1l%7Exzm_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9.A
for more information.

TRAVEL UPDATES
Be sure to check continental.com at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%289zsve%7E%7Dzkw1l%7Exzm_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9-A
before leaving for the airport. We're looking forward to welcoming you onboard!

****************************************
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. This Week's Destinations
2. Continental Vacations Offers
3. Hilton Hotels & Resorts, Doubletree Hotels & Resorts, & Embassy Suites Hotels Offers
4. Alamo Rent A Car Offers
5. National Car Rental Offers

****************************************
1. THIS WEEK'S DESTINATIONS

Depart Saturday, December 1 and return on either Monday, December 3 or Tuesday, December 4, 2001. Please see the Terms and Conditions listed at the end of this e-mail.

Purchase continental.com Specials online until 11:59pm (CST) Friday at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%289zsve%7E%7Dzkw1l%7Exzm_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%2CA
You can also purchase continental.com Specials for an additional cost of $20 per ticket through our telephone service at 1-800-642-1617.

****************************************
TRAVEL MAY ORIGINATE IN EITHER CITY
****************************************

****Roundtrip BETWEEN NEW YORK/NEWARK and:

$119 - Ft. Lauderdale, FL
$109 - Hartford, CT
$109 - Manchester, NH
$109 - Providence, RI

********************************
2. CONTINENTAL VACATIONS OFFERS

5,000 OnePass Bonus Miles Just for Skiing!

Enjoy the best of Colorado's white powder during ski season. Book a ski package for 5 nights or longer and you can earn 5,000 OnePass Bonus Miles on Continental Airlines.

For more information about this exciting offer, visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%289zsve%7E%7Dzkw1l%7Exzm_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%2BA

****************************************
3. CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS FROM HILTON HOTELS AND RESORTS, DOUBLETREE
HOTELS AND RESORTS, AND EMBASSY SUITES HOTELS

The following rates are available December 1 - December 3, 2001 and are priced per night.
--------------------------------------
Fort Lauderdale, FL - Hilton Fort Lauderdale Airport, Dania, FL. - $119

Hartford, CT - Hilton Hartford, Hartford, CT. - $119

Manchester, NH - Hilton Dedham Place, Dedham, MA. - $79

Newark, NJ - Hilton Parsippany, Parsippany, NJ. - $89
Newark, NJ - Doubletree Club Suites Jersey City, Jersey City, NJ. - $159

New York, NY - Hilton New York, New York, NY. - $179/Night, 12/1-2

To book this week's special rates for Hilton Family Hotels, visit and book at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%289zsve%7E%7Dzkw1l%7Exzm_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9*A
Special rates apply only for the dates listed at each hotel and are subject to availability. Check hilton.com for specific dates at each Hilton Family Hotel. Or call at 1-800-774-1500 and ask for Value Rates. Restrictions apply to these rates.

********************************
4. CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS FROM ALAMO RENT A CAR

Rates listed below are valid on compact class vehicles at airport locations only. Other car types may be available. Rates are valid for rentals on Saturday, December 1 with returns Monday, December 3 or Tuesday, December 4, 2001.
-------------------------------
$26 a day in:  Hartford, CT (BDL)
$26 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)
$26 a day in:  Fort Lauderdale, FL (FLL)
$26 a day in:  Providence, RI (PVD)

To receive continental.com Specials discounted rates, simply make advance reservations and be sure to request ID # 596871 and Rate Code 33. Book your reservation online at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%289zsve%7E%7Dzkw1l%7Exzm_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%29A
or contact Alamo at 1-800 GO ALAMO.

*If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed, Alamo offers great rates when you book online at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%289zsve%7E%7Dzkw1l%7Exzm_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%28A
For complete details on these offers, please refer to Alamo's terms and conditions below.

****************************************
6. CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS FROM NATIONAL CAR RENTAL

Rates listed below are valid on intermediate class vehicles at airport locations only. Other car types may be available. Rates are valid for rentals on Saturday, December 1 with returns Monday, December 3 or Tuesday, December 4, 2001.
------------------------------------------
$29 a day in:  Hartford, CT (BDL)
$29 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)
$29 a day in:  Fort Lauderdale, FL (FLL)
$21 a day in:  Manchester, NH (MHT)

To receive continental.com Specials discounted rates, simply make your reservations in advance and be sure to request Product Code COOLUS. To make your reservation, contact National at 1-800-CAR-RENT (1-800-227-7368), or book your reservation online at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%289zsve%7E%7Dzkw1l%7Exzm_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%27A
Please enter COOLUS in the Product Rate Code field, and 5037126 in the Contract ID field to ensure you get these rates on these dates.

* If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed, National offers great rates when you book online at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%289zsve%7E%7Dzkw1l%7Exzm_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%26A
For complete details on these offers, please refer to National's terms and conditions below.

****************************************
CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS RULES:
Fares include a $37.20 fuel surcharge.  Passenger Facility Charges, up to $18 depending on routing, are not included. Up to $2.75 per segment federal excise tax, as applicable, is not included.  Applicable International and or Canadian taxes and fees up to $108, varying by destination, are not included and may vary slightly depending on currency exchange rate at the time of purchase. For a complete listing of rules please visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%289zsve%7E%7Dzkw1l%7Exzm_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9.%2FA

ALAMO RENT A CAR'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Taxes (including VLF taxes up to US$1.89 per day in California and GST), other governmentally-authorized or imposed surcharges, license recoupment fees, fuel, additional driver fee, drop charges and optional items (such as CDW Waiver Savers(R) up to US$18.99 a day,) are extra. Renter must meet standard age, driver and credit requirements. Rates higher for drivers under age 25. Concession recoupment fees may add up to 14% to the rental rate at some on-airport locations. Up to 10.75% may be added to the rental rate if you rent at an off-airport location and exit on our shuttle bus. Weekly rates require a 5-day minimum rental or daily rates apply. For weekend rates, the vehicle must be picked up after 9 a.m. on Thursday and returned before midnight on Monday or higher daily rates apply. 24-hour advance reservation required. May not be combined with other discounts. Availability is limited. All vehicles must be returned to the country of origin. Offer not valid in San Jose, CA.

NATIONAL CAR RENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Customer must provide Contract ID# at the time of reservation to be eligible for discounts. Offer valid at participating National locations in the US and Canada. Minimum rental age is 25. This offer is not valid with any other special discount or promotion. Standard rental qualifications apply. Subject to availability and blackout dates. Advance reservations required. Geographic driving restrictions may apply.

---------------------------------------
This e-mail message and its contents are copyrighted and are proprietary products of Continental Airlines, Inc. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, or transfer of the message or its content, in any medium, is strictly prohibited.

****************************************
If you need assistance please visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%289zsve%7E%7Dzkw1l%7Exzm_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9..A
View our privacy policy at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%289zsve%7E%7Dzkw1l%7Exzm_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9.-A

This e-mail was sent to: elizabeth.sager@enron.com

TO UNSUBSCRIBE:
We hope you will find continental.com Specials a valuable source of information. However, if you prefer not to take advantage of this opportunity, please let us know by visiting the continental.com Specials page on our web site at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%289zsve%7E%7Dzkw1l%7Exzm_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9.%2BA

TO SUBSCRIBE:
Please visit the continental.com Specials page on our web site at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%289zsve%7E%7Dzkw1l%7Exzm_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9.%2CA


---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 06/05/2000
01:58 PM ---------------------------

John J Lavorato
06/02/2000 11:49 AM
To: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:

Here are our picks for the incoming class.

Gas

Analysts:

Gabrial Chavez
Nate Blackburn
Phillip Berry (Maybe for Sally Beck or Beth Perlman)
Sachin Gandhi
Miguel Nasser
James Wininger

Associates

Dustin Collins
Vikas Dwivedi
Li Sun

Power

Analysts:

Elizabeth Johnston
Possey Martinez
Gary Justice

Associates:

Doug Seaworth
Dustin Collins
Eduardo Gil
Pearce Hammond
David Maskel
Michael Kelly

Please confirm how many of these we can lock up.

Lavo


The report named: East Position Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=2&report_name=East+Position+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/14/2001>, published as of 11/14/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


I had Maria send this to me.  I think we can utilize this attachment.

ds
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Salazar, Maria
Sent:	Monday, February 11, 2002 1:23 PM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell; Lohman, TK
Subject:

i'm having the prints made.
they will be on 11x17 in color
100 of them.
maria
5.1790


When: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US
& Canada).
Where: EB3335

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


We would like to issue this press release as soon as possible today (June
1).  Please let me know if you have any changes or comments by 11:00am.

Thank you-
Meredith Philipp
713-345-7141


Start Date: 4/30/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001043007.txt
Error: Invalid variant type conversion

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 7 / Preferred:   6.40 / Final:   6.30)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/20/2001 07:18
AM ---------------------------

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/20/2001 07:11:05 AM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)" <lee.johnson@ps.ge.com>

Subject: RE: GE Guaranty Comments

This is okay.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shoemaker, Kent (PS, SSEP)
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 7:03 PM
To: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
Subject: FW: GE Guaranty Comments

> ----------
> From:    Kay.Mann@enron.com[SMTP:KAY.MANN@ENRON.COM]
> Sent:    Thursday, April 19, 2001 6:01:52 PM
> To:    Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP); Shoemaker, Kent (PS, SSEP)
> Subject:    GE Guaranty Comments
> Auto forwarded by a Rule
>
>
Gee, one more item for your review.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/19/2001 06:00
PM ---------------------------

"Lang, Gregory F." <gregorylang@paulhastings.com> on 04/19/2001 05:59:10 PM

To:   "'ccampbell@kslaw.com'" <ccampbell@kslaw.com>, "'kay.mann@enron.com'"
      <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   "'iparker@freshfields.com'" <iparker@freshfields.com>,
      "'lisa.obrien@freshfields.com'" <lisa.obrien@freshfields.com>

Subject:  GE Guaranty Comments

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/19/01 18:59:28
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of
conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are
two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.
If you have any questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

============================================================================
==

"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."

============================================================================
==

Kay - Carolyn asked  me to forward to you our few comments to the GE Parent
Guaranty to forward to  the appropriate person(s) at GE.  They are attached
in a pdf file. Our  comments are limited to the inclusion of a notice and
consent of the collateral  assignment of the Recipient's rights under the
Guaranty and to conform the  governing law clause to the other GE delivered
documents in this transaction.  Please feel free to call me or to have the
appropriate person at GE contact me  with any questions.

Greg

Gregory F.  Lang
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker  LLP
1055 Washington Blvd.
Stamford, CT 06901

203.961.7446 (p)
203.674.7646 (direct fax)
203.359.3031 (firm fax)
gregorylang@paulhastings.com

(See attached file: Stamford.pdf)


ATTENTION N.A. NATURAL GAS INDEX SUBSCRIBERS                                                                                Commencing January 1, 2002, the ICE Daily Index will be distributed at 13:30 EST. Also, the following trading hubs will be added to the existing 27 pricing points:                                                                                1.	ANR-SW                                                                                2.	Consumers                                                                                3.	NGPL-TXOK East                                                                                4.	Panhandle                                                                                5.	TGP-Z0                                                                                6.	Union Gas-Dawn                                                                                7.	Station 2                                                                                Additional hubs will be included once trading volumes reach critical mass as determined by a 90 day standard deviation analysis conducted by ICE.

For further information contact:                                                                                Bud Hum at 312.674.4915 or                                                                                Joe Adevai at 646.792.2620                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange                                                                                HELPDESK 770.738.2101


My proposed edits to Harry's excellent first cut.  They're quick and dirty.
My apologies.

Best,
Jeff


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/14/2001 03:01 PM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	03/14/2001 02:46 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "Quan-Hill, Danielle" <danielle.quan-hill@mirant.com>, "Bill Carlson"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bob
Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bob Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>,
"Bob Gates" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "Carolyn Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>,
"Cody Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Craig Chancellor"
<craigc@calpine.com>, "Curt Hatton" <Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "David Parquet"
<dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Dean Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "Doug
Fernley" <fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Duane Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "Ed
Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Eileen Koch" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "Eric
Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "Frank DeRosa"
<fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Hap Boyd"
<rboyd@enron.com>, "Jack Hawks" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "Jack Pigott"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "Jeff Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jim Willey"
<elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Joe Greco" <jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "Joe
Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "John Stout" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>,
"Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "Kassandra Gough"
<kgough@calpine.com>, "Kate Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "Ken
Hoffman" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "kent Palmerton"
<kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Larrea, John" <John.g.Larrea@williams.com>,
"Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marty McFadden"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,
"Paula Soos" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Randy Hickok"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Roger
Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Ross Ain" <rain@caithnessenergy.com>,
"Stephanie Newell" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Steve Iliff"
<siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steven
Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>, "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Tony Wetzel"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<sheryl_gussett@reliantenergy.com>
		 cc: "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>,
"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Rina Venturini" <rventurini@teamgsi.net>,
"Anne Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Bev Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>, "Cary Rudman"
<cjrudman@softcom.net>, "Chuck Cole" <ccole@advocation-inc.com>, "Delany
Hunter" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "DJ Smith"
<djsmith@smithandkempton.com>, "Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com>, "Jamie
Parker" <jparker@hmot.com>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Marie
Moretti" <mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Maureen OHaren" <Oharen@HMOT.com>,
"Mike Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Phil Isenberg" <Isenberg@HMOT.com>,
"Robert Ross" <robbiz@cwo.com>, "Ron Tom" <thackbarth@govadv.com>, "Scott
Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Susan McCabe"
<smccabe@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Theo Pathos" <theo@ppallc.com>
		 Subject: Fw: IEP et all amendments to ABX1 60

Attached are amendments to AB 60x which IEP is presenting today at a 2:30
meeting with Assembly Speaker Bob Hertzberg.  As a follow-up to the meeting,
IEP member company lobbyists will join me on a conference call at 3:45 today
to discuss strategy on "shopping" this language to the Assembly
Appropriations Committee members.  You are welcome to join in on that
conference call.

Dial In Number     (800) 891-9585
Participant Code   756453

-- Julee

> Here it is as we discussed.
>
> Bullets on the amendments:
>
> 1) Amendments are intended to help load serving entities secure contract
for
> power for California loads from California resources without unnecessarily
> delaying or disrupting the development of projects within California.
> 2) It is necessary to remove vague and ambiguous language from the bill
that
> could disrupt current or new projects or undermine commercial arrangements
> already in place. Specifically, the language that calls for comparisons of
> offers is particularly difficult to implement and will It is necessary to
> remove language
>
> Andy Brown
> Ellison, Schneider & Harris


Guys, attached you will find a final cut on the ENA 2001 expense budget.
Please review and make any adjustments to your existing plan that are
appropriate to hit the net ENA target.  In order to stay flat year on year, I
split the remaining positive variance equally across the groups.  As we had
discussed earlier, these costs will not be allocated to the business units
and will be tracked on the ENA income statement below the line and the
accountability managed by each of you.  All outside variable costs,
specifically related to specific deals, will be charged to the business units
eg) outside legal and tax, outside technical expertise, facility costs,
outside research support, incremental back and mid office support for
specific asset management deals, specific entertainment, etc.  I look at this
cost structure as the minimum capacity charge we need to operate our business
and evaluate/manage our risks.

Wes, can you please  finalize the one page plan (expenses and headcount) for
each group with these changes.

Regards
Delainey


I guess go back to the original contract performance numbers.  The other
numbers must be specific to the site for the Las Vegas project.

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 04/02/2001 11:05:25 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

I changed the performance numbers in Section 10.7 and 10.8 to reflect
the changes requested by Lee Johnson in his 3/12 e-mail that you
forwarded to me on 3/16.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

Hi Pete,

Are the performance numbers the same as the original master numbers?  I
recall some email traffic on this.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/02/2001
10:22
AM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ps.ge.com on 04/02/2001 08:15:48 AM

To:   Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

Kay,

Is Salmon LLC the Delta Power project?  The unit 25-28 prices are $
15,769,725 per unit.  Unit 28 Guaranteed Delivery Date (=ex-works ship
date)
is 31 December, 2001.  A unit serial number has not been assigned to
date.

I don't know how your business teams on LV and Delta agreements are
distributing pricing and want to show payment and termination schedules
between the 2 deals.  Maybe you can poll Steve Thome, Bill Williams and
Jake
Thomas to get these answers.

For Salmon, the performance values in Section 10 will be per the 24 unit
master contract.
I'm in New Orleans today, reachable via cell phone 713-823-2055.

Regards,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 5:50 PM
To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)
Subject: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

Hi Lee,

Here is the new turbine contract, blacklined against the March 27
version.

I look forward to speaking with you soon.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/30/2001
05:48
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 03/30/2001 04:02:01 PM

To:   "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>

Subject:  Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

     Attached please find a clean copy of the Salmon Energy Turbine
Agreement (the second document below), which includes Lee Johnson's
proposed changes to Section 10.7, as well as a blackline (first document
below) showing changes to the (3/27) version you forwarded earlier
today. I have include notes within the agreement indicationg those
places where questions remain - e.g., how the addition of the new
turbine affects the pricing schedule, guaranteed delivery, etc.
 <<Comparison of Version 5 of the LV Cogen to Version 1 of the Salmon
Energy Agreement.DOC>>  <<Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 2.DOC>>
(See attached file: Comparison of Version 5 of the LV Cogen to Version 1
of
the Salmon Energy Agreement.DOC)
(See attached file: Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 2.DOC)


I will be out of the office on Monday,but am available the rest of the week
for a conference call, except from 2:30 - 3:00 on Wednesday.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 3:20 PM
To: drhunt@watervalley.net; wmonjoy@brunini.com
Subject: MDEA et al and Enron transaction

Gentlemen,

Could we schedule some time for a conference call next week?  I would
appreciate the opportunity to work through some of the legal issues.  I
have the lofty goal of not working Memorial Day weekend this year, so I'm
trying to get as much done on this deal as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Kay

PS.  I'm open Tues am and most of Wednesday.  I can probably work my
schedule so that I'm available quite a bit of next week.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Jamie_K_Schnorf@fpl.com@ENRON   On Behalf Of Jamie_K_Schnorf@fpl.com
Sent:	Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:27 AM
To:	Art_R_Morris@fpl.com; Spraggins, Gary; Linhart, Joe; Michael_Jessop@fpl.com; Janzen, Randy; Ronald_Scheirer@fpl.com; TransOKnoms@enogex.com
Cc:	Forbish, Sherry; Greaney, Chris
Subject:	Lamar Nominations (Feb 15)

Attached is the NNG Lamar burn schedule for February 15, 2002.  At this
time we plan on  55,000.

Thanks
(See attached file: 0202 NNG Lamar Nomination.xls)
Jamie Schnorf - FPL
561-625-7032

 - 0202 NNG Lamar Nomination.xls


FYI -

Scroll below for meeting conclusion and next steps.

Marie
----- Forwarded by Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000 06:27 PM -----

	Marie Hejka
	11/30/2000 05:34 PM

		 To: David Gossett/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Anthony
Mends/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Brandon
Rigney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allen Elliott/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Bryan Powell/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Wasaff/NA/Enron@Enron, John
Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: KM Task Force Content Strategy Meeting

Thank you for your participation in yesterday's meeting.  Please review the
below meeting notes.

Sincerely,

Marie Hejka

  11/29/00
Content Strategy Meeting Notes

Attendees:
Allen Elliott - mynetwork.com
David Gossett - mywEBSource.com
Marie Hejka ) KM Task Force Chair
Anthony Mends - mywEBSource.com
Brandon Rigney ) my.home.enron.com

Meeting Details.

The above group met to discuss the content strategy for the KM Task Force
portal.  Our intention is to synergize the collective intelligence of these
teams to develop a best practices portal.  The task force is in a unique
position because the portal we will develop from is Bryan Powell,s
mynetwork.com which although it largely reflects Brandon Rigney,s
my.home.enron.com, it does not reflect the characteristics requested by the
KM pilot executive sponsors and task force members.  The question to ask is:
are the characteristics identified by the KM pilot executive sponsors and
task force members the characteristics we should include in a portal?
Further analysis is required to conclude what user needs are before we can
determine what to include in a portal.

The team agreed that a portal is relatively easy to develop.  What is more
important and challenging is the process, established perhaps by a
centralized KM effort, by which information or content is made available to
all given portals. It is the content accessible through a portal which
determines the success of the portal.  Yahoo.com users, through a minimal
number of starting points, may access some 6000 containers of information.
For our project, it has not been determined what information (what content)
needs to be accessed from a portal.  The answer to this question should
predict what front end buttons are most important to place on the initial
dashboard of the portal.

Does the task force want to enter in to the business of hashing out what
specific content to make available through the portal?  No, we have neither
the time nor the responsibility to undertake this.  But, how then, does the
task force determine what the initial dashboard will look like if we don,t
have an understanding of what content users actually need most to access?
The requirements phase should predict this.

What is most challenging about content?  The answer:  locking down the
containerable information (content) to bridge to portals.  Information needs
to be syndicated.  In order for it to be syndicated, it must be in an
appropriate container.  &Containerable8 information is information that can
be shown as a channel.  In other words, containerable information is
information that can be accessed from the portal.  Not all information on a
given website is containerable and available to be pulled by portals.
Editorial assistance is required to make certain information is contained.  A
KM strategy should propose a method to identify, develop and maintain
information a portal can capture.

Meeting Conclusion.

The development of any business structure should be driven by business
needs.  Given business needs vary from Business Unit to Business Unit and
person to person, the task of developing a portal as the single interface for
all Enron Business Units is large.

Consider the following diagram as a high level plan we may reference to
develop the content strategy for a best practices portal.

Requirements Phase	Design Phase	Build Phase	Test Phase 	Launch Phase

We are currently in the requirements phase of this project.  Although
multiple, personalized portals have been developed, unveiled and implemented,
we are still gathering requirements to create a best practices portal.  The
task force is chartered with the responsibility to develop a Knowledge
Management proposal.  In this proposal, we may consider the process through
which containerable information is identified, developed, and maintained.  In
the meantime, the content strategy team is available for the task force
members to consult.  The content strategy team will help Bryan Powell,s team
shape mynetwork.com.

With respect to content strategy, some of the responsibilities a KM proposal
should review include:
? A plan to develop a process to determine what information is important to
contain
? A plan to develop a process to identify owners of containers
? A plan to develop a process for teaching people how to build containers
? A plan to develop a process for cleaning up data
? A plan to develop a process for inventorying data on websites
? A plan to develop a process for inventorying data on the &O8 drive and
other assets
? A plan to develop a process for creating a consulting portal kit whereby
specific needs of communities are identified and reflected in a best
practices portal
? A plan to develop a process for shutting off old channels (i.e. email from
Office of the Chairman) and turning on new channels (i.e. portal delivery of
Office of the Chairman information)

Next Steps.

Identify content strategy &to do,s8 for the requirements phase.
Identify owners of content strategy &to do,s8 for the requirements phase.
Establish weekly meetings for content strategy team.
Content strategy team members gain authorization from management to support
task force.


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/25/2001 04:55 PM -----

	"US Publishing" <brice@restructuringtoday.com>
	06/25/2001 07:51 PM
	Please respond to brice

		 To: "RT Reader" <brice@restructuringtoday.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Restructuring Today Tuesday June 26 2001

(see attached file:  rt010626.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
800-486-8201
202-298-8201
 - rt010626.pdf


There is a sale to CES for a volume of 34,248 dts, deal 149430.  It has your
name on it.  My conterpart at CES does not recognize it.  According to Unify
the downstream k# is 94946.  If you did this deal, do you remember who you
did the deal with?

Thanks.


Hi Diana.  I wasn't sure if you wanted purch or sales so I've included
both.
shari


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Weekly Priority Mtg./Raetta

Date:		8/9/2001
Time:		9:30 AM - 10:30 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


thanks.  Can you provide me with the appropriate signature block for ENA/ECT
Investments Inc. through the agent?

	Mahesh Lakhani
	10/04/2000 10:01 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT, Janine
Juggins/LON/ECT, Cindy Buckley/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: U.K. arranger for ENA and ECT Investments, Inc.

Sara.   It has been formed.  Enron Investment Services Ltd was set up on
3/10/00

Regards
Mahesh

Janine Juggins
04/10/2000 15:10
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mahesh Lakhani/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: U.K. arranger for ENA and ECT Investments, Inc.

Mahesh, please can you update Sara on the status (I think it has been formed,
but Mahesh will confirm)
Regards
Janine

From: Sara Shackleton on 04/10/2000 08:19 CDT
To: Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: U.K.  arranger for ENA and ECT Investments, Inc.

Any word yet on creation of the new entity?  Sara


---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001 02:30
PM ---------------------------

Jim Schwieger
04/18/2000 11:12 AM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Physical Location of KMTP

Gerald:  Sorry this took so long!  Here is the address to send the
Interconnect agreements.

 Thanks,  Jim Schwieger
---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2000 11:09
AM ---------------------------

"Pilkington, Kevin" <Kevin_Pilkington@kne.com> on 04/18/2000 10:40:35 AM
To: "'Jim.Schwieger@enron.com'" <Jim.Schwieger@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Physical Location of KMTP

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Pilkington, Kevin
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 10:30 AM
> To: 'Jim.Schweiger@enron.com'
> Subject: Physical Location of KMTP
>
> Located at 500 Dallas Street, One Allen Center, go to the 11th floor
> receptionist.


Please plan to attend a meeting on August 21, 2001 from 9:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. in 39C1.  We will review the results of the customer specific Mastio results and website survey feedback.  Binders containing all the related documentation will be delivered to you this week for your review prior to the meeting.  During the meeting we will create customer relationship management action plans.
Thank you in advance for your participation.
Donna


Steve:  I intend to get the following email to Ken once he lands today in
DC.

Per our conference call last evening, we put together additional information
on Administration appointments in preparation for Ken Lay's meeting with Clay
Johnson.  The post of Ambassador to India has garnered the interest of
several candidates.  Former Senator Larry Pressler has asked for support.
Appended is an Email from Joe Hillings regarding the state of play on this
nomination.  I also check with Wade Cline in India about his reaction to
Senator Pressler.  Wade indicated that he does not know the Senator
personally, but that "he is well thought of in India and would be a good
choice."  Please note from Joe's Email that Joe is concerned about a possible
Pressler nomination.

With respect to the SEC, Ken was asked to speak on behalf of James Doty from
the law firm of Baker Botts.  Appended is his bio.  I checked with Ed
Gillespie this morning about his latest information on SEC.  Ed believes that
Joe Grunfest of Stanford University is the leading candidate.  No one has
contacted us on behalf of Mr. Grunfest.  In a recent Washington Post article,
in addition to Doty, Rep. Chris Cox was mentioned as a possible candidate.
Ed did not turn up Cox's name in his conversation with Administration
officials today.

I understand FERC candidates will also be discussed in the meeting.  Ed
Gillespie indicated this morning that "Pat Wood is still the pick."   Ed also
reported that Rep. Joe Barton is pushing Joe Kelliher for a potential slot.
We have worked closely with Joe over the past several weeks on California
issues.  He was on the transition team and is currently housed at the
Department of Energy as an Advisor to the Secretary.  I also understand that
McLane Layton of Senator Nickles' office has been told by the White House she
is on the list for consideration.  Rick Shapiro and I met with her last
week.   Both Kelliher and Layton were among the candidates listed on an early
Enron document given to the transition team.  I believe everyone in Enron
Government Affairs believes  Pat Wood is the superior pick.


Today's hearing was dominated by :
1) many lawyers arguing over whether the Commission must declare that the
"rate freeze" is over before raising rates, or whether the Commission can
rely on its general constitutional and statutory authority to raise rates on
an interim basis, without addressing the issue of the rate freeze, and,
1) an appearance by Ralph Nader.

The Legal Issue
In general, our proposal seems to have gotten some traction.  Whether it
sticks remains to be seen, however.  We proposed that:

The Commission has the authority to raise rates without addressing the rate
freeze issue.
The Commission will not have the facts it needs, and it won't have  provided
the due process necessary by Jan 4th, to address all the complex issues tied
to the rate freeze.  And if it tries, it's likely to face a flurry of law
suits, which is in no one's best interest.
For it's Jan 4th decision, the Commission should confine itself to
determining whether, and if so by how much, to raise rates to maintain the
utilities' access to capital markets. (We've taken no position on whether
there's a need to raise rates.)
setting a hearing schedule to examine the "rate freeze" and all related
issues thoroughly and methodically.

The utilities argued that the Commission must declare an end to the rate
freeze; otherwise any Commission decision to raise rates would be easy to
attack in the courts.  (In reality, the utilities want the Commission to end
the rate freeze in order to assure lenders that the Commission will permit
the utilities to recover going-forward procurement costs.  Under the rate
freeze, the utility is at risk for procurement costs that exceed the rate
freeze.)

In his presentation, our outside counsel offered numerous citations to past
Commission decision and court cases supporting the Commission's ability to
raise rates if it found it necessary to do so.  Many other parties agreed
with our position.  A few parties said that the issue was too murky to make a
call.  During questioning, both the President of the Commission (Loretta
Lynch) and the presiding judge seemed to indicate that they believe the
Commission has ample authority to raise rates without having to address the
rate freeze issues.

The Ralph Factor
Apparently, having lost the Presidential election, Ralph Nader's still
looking for work.  He showed up at the hearings today and held a very lengthy
news conference.  From what I could hear, he targeted all of his criticism at
the utilities for being greedy, and at the Governor for being too ready and
willing to bail the utilities out.  Even when thrown some soft balls about
"out of state generators," Nader stuck to bashing the Governor and the
utilities.  But I couldn't hear the entire press conference, so he may have
said things that I missed.

The Next Steps
The hearings that were scheduled to end today will now go into next week.
Tomorrow, the utilities are scheduled to make their case for financial
hardship.  Customers intend to question the utilities very aggressively (as
does the PUC).  The utilities will also have the chance to question the
consumer representatives who filed their own proposals and analysis with the
Commission.
On Tuesday, the Commission is likely to take up the issue of how big any rate
increase needs to be and how much of the increase each customer group should
shoulder.

More tomorrow on the call.

Best,
Jeff

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	12/27/2000 08:57 PM

		 To: Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron, James
D Steffes/NA/Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT, Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT
		 cc: Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES,
Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Erika
Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W
Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES,
Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris
Waser/HOU/EES@EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES,
Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES,
Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES,
Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha
Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES,
Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES,
Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Scott
Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya
Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri
Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Update--Day 1 of California PUC Hearings

Thanks Roger.  Here are the highlights of today's hearings:

 Common themes--many tracked ours pretty closely
Not a question of whether rates need to rise, but by how much.
Though some oppose any and all rate increases, the lion's share acknowledged
that the utilities have a cash flow problem and the a rate increase is
necessary.
Due process matters.
If the Commission is thinking about going as far as ending rate freezes and
increasing rates, it better provide for ample due process, or countless law
suits will ensue.
Don't jump the gun.
A rate increase is likely, but only the utilities benefit from adoption of
the utilities' proposals. The Commission needs to carefully scrutinize the
utilities' claims and take a careful look at the level of increase required
to maintain access to capital markets.  However, as expected, the utilities
implored the Commission to jump the gun immediately.  The utilities want the
Commission to declare an end to the rate freeze and raise rates on Jan.4.
No more divestiture.
The utility should keep the generating assets it retained, but the Commission
should ensure that the assets' benefits are allocated equally among all
customers.  One legislator recommended that the State buy the utilities'
hydro assets, which would give the utilities the cash they need and give the
state control over some generation.
Treat all customers equally and fairly.
The Commission should not create two classes of customers (e.g., large v.
small; direct access v. bundled).  No customer group should be sacrificied to
save another.
Be as narrow as possible/do as little harm as possible
The immediate problem is the utility's cash/credit crunch.  As such, the
Commission should do only enough to solve this very specific, immediate
problem.  A modest rate increase is all that's required and the Commission
should do no more.

At the beginning and the end of the hearing, the President of the Commission
asked parties to be prepared (at tomorrow's hearing) to discuss whether the
Commission could legally use its other, broad powers to raise rates without
declaring an end to the rate freeze.  It seems that she seems some benefit in
raising rates, but leaving AB 1890 otherwise intact untill the Commission can

Marketers and generators are to blame for the problem
Though not universally embraced, the theme came up repeatedly.

A few parties (e.g., the Unions, low income consumer groups, one PUC
commissioner) called for complete re-regulation of the industry, returning
the utilities to vertically integrated monopolies.  But they were the
exception rather than the rule at today's hearing.

2. Next steps
There hearings were scheduled to end on Thursay, but now will continue
through Friday.
Tomorrow, lawyers will provide "oral" arguments on whether the Commission
must end the rate freeze in order to increase rates.  We will argue that it
does not have to, and should not, go through the complex and controversial
exercise of determing whether the rate freeze is over between now and
01.04.01.  We will argue that the Commission has the authority to raise rates
without ending the rate freeze, and if it decides to raise rates, it should
do so while keeping AB 1890's basic structure in place until a full and fair
hearing of the issues is completed.   We are talking to other stakeholders to
persuade them to take the same approach.  In terms of legal arguments, this
is clearly a long shot, but one that seems worth taking.
After the oral argument, the utilities will present their rate proposals and
"all interested persons" will have the opportunity to cross-examine the
utilities (in short, tomorrow will also be a zoo).
When asked what the process will be for issuing a proposed decision and
providing comments, the President of the Commission responded "we don't know,
it's evolving."  In other words, the Commission is doing a poor job of
ensuring that their Jan 4 decision is "appeal-proof."
Keep in mind that the situation remains extremely fluid and the trend is
still toward ending the rate freeze on Jan. 4th.  We continue to aggressively
offer alternatives to that possibility and continue to try to bring other
stakeholders to our side.
We're doing everything necessary to preserve our appeal rights.

We can discuss further on the 10 AM (CST) call tomorrow.

Best,
Jeff

	Roger Yang@EES
	12/27/2000 05:43 PM

		 To: Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James W
Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Tony
Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M
Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric
Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES,
Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken
Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES,
Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Debora
Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Christina
Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha
Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy
Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya
Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri
Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Re: Reminder - Level Setting Mtg-California Markets Focus Group
EB2868

Got an update from Jeff Dasovich.  No earth shattering news.  Comments have
been all over the place.  The impression is being made by differing parties
that the issues are very complex and would inevitably result in endless
lawsuits.  Possible conclusion by the CPUC may be to invoke emergency powers
to implement an emergency surcharge and avoid addressing the issue of when
the rate freeze ends in these hearings.  However, this is just speculation.
Jeff will return to the office by 5:00 pm PST and will send out a summary of
today's hearings.

Roger

Leticia Botello
12/27/2000 06:57 AM
To: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James W
Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Tony
Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M
Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric
Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES,
Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken
Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES,
Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES,
Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa
Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES,
Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda
Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES,
Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES,
Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES,
Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Dorothy
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Fran
Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Reminder - Level Setting Mtg-California Markets Focus Group EB2868

12/27/00

Time    Location Call In #  Pass Code

10:00 Central Standard Time  EB 2868  1-800-713-8600  80435

This is a recurring daily meeting until further notice  (this invitation will
schedule your calendar through 1/31/01).

Time, Call In #, and Pass Code are the same for all meetings.  Conference
room location will be changed as soon as possible to better accommodate the
participants.

Note:  Optional Invitees FYI Only

Please call me if you have any questions

Leticia

x-58752


Dear Ken,

Now that the election is over (finally!),  I am turning to exploring future
prospects after my current post as Deputy Secretary and COO of the Department
of Energy.   I am following up your offer the last time we met to call you
when I was next thinking about making a job change.   The last time, when I
moved to DOE from OMB in the White House, we were trying to meet but had just
been unable to match our schedules.

I am from California, and am most interested in going back to help some
business in the energy sector carry out an effective strategic approach to
that market during this difficult period.  I believe the combination of my
political and business experience can be very helpful in these times.

I am attaching a copy of my resume, and look forward to talking to you.

Sincerely, TJ

 - resume.std.2000.wpd


Sherri,

Any resolution of the scheduling conflict Jeff Skilling had for February the
22nd?
Our friends at UT are ready to make the reservations and send out invitations
to this conference

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
05:00 PM ---------------------------

"Ehud I. Ronn" <eronn@mail.utexas.edu> on 10/12/2000 10:12:56 AM
To: Richard.Causey@enron.com, Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Spring 2001 Conference Participation by Jeffrey K. Skilling

Rick / Vince:

Good morning.

Further to my discussions with Vince during his visit to the Energy Finance
Program yesterday, I write at this time to inquire whether Mr. Skilling's
assistant has been able to confirm his participation as 2/22/2001 keynote
speaker at our Conference.

With thanks for your intercession on our behalf,
Ehud Ronn

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Professor of Finance and Jack S. Josey Professor in Energy Studies
     Director, Center for Energy Finance Education and Research
     McCombs School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
01/13/99 07:47 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  xtrials@optioninvestor.com (Option Investor Newsletter     Trials)
                       01/13/99 07:28 PM

Please respond to xtrials@optioninvestor.com
To: Option Investor Newsletter Trials <xtrials@optioninvestor.com>
cc:  (bcc: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Wednesday - Option Investor Newsletter - Update

The Option Investor Newsletter         Wednesday  1-13-98
Copyright 1998, All rights reserved.
Redistribution in any form strictly prohibited.

Posted online for subscribers at http://WWW.OPTIONINVESTOR.COM

Also provided as a service to The Online Investor Advantage

Published three times weekly, Sunday, Tuesday, Thursday evenings.
******************************************************************
MARKET WRAP
******************************************************************
        01-13-98         High     Low     Volume   Advances Decline
DOW     9349.56 -125.12 9471.34  9213.10  934,809k  1,021   2,090
Nasdaq  2317.30 -  3.40 2353.87  2206.19 1195,400k  1,628   2,504
S&P-100  612.83 -  3.66  620.45   598.01   Totals   2,649   4,594
S&P-500 1234.40 -  5.11 1247.66  1206.59            36.6%   63.4%
$RUT     424.86 -  2.50  427.36   412.64
$TRAN   3169.42 - 37.23 3202.50  3085.21
VIX       31.26 +  4.88   35.48    29.55
Put/Call Ratio      .48
******************************************************************

The Nightmare on Wall Street, Starring China, Brazil, Argentina and
others.

I woke up with a terrible nightmare this morning. I dreamed that
the S&P Futures were limit down -27 and the Dow futures were down
-300. The bad news - it was not a nightmare, it was real life.

If you don't live in a closet you know by now that the Brazil
counterpart to Alan Greenspan resigned and Brazil devalued its
currency. The worst possible of all global scenarios. But wait!
Is that another dip to buy?

After opening down -266 on the Dow and -113 on the Nasdaq, the worst
was over before it started. The CNBC hype undoubtedly contributed
to the massive sell off because as soon as buyers could get into
the market we moved immediately off the panic lows.

I am not saying this is not a problem but as I said last night I
thought Brazil had already been discounted in the market. The
rapid bounce back has proven this to some extent. Several analysts
said several months ago that we could expect -500 to -600 if Brazil
devalued. Since it did not happen it shows the strength of the
current bull market.

I went on record last night that I did not think we were starting
a correction and the bull was just resting. Was I worried this
morning? You bet! But I was also greatly relieved when I saw the
buyers come back to work. Think about it. What else can happen
that could be worse than this? Nothing I can imagine. Sure the
Asian connection to Brazil will be tested tonight and we are still
faced with the domino theory in South America, but again, I think
the worst is already discounted. As soon as investors realize that
Latin America did not sink beneath the ocean and the IMF is not
going to let the eighth largest economy in the world sink, then
they will be putting that cash back to work.

The volume this morning was not bad. The volume on the recovery
this afternoon was great. The Nasdaq did almost 1.2 billion shares
again and the NYSE over 900 mil. The market is expecting earnings
by the dozens next week and appears ready to rumble.

Intel broke with the pack early and starred in the recovery adding
+3.44 for the day. Microsoft, SunMicro and almost anything tech
shook off the news and powered forward. SunMicro was up over $10
at one point on takeover rumors by IBM. IBM announced they were
raising over $4 bil in new cash today which was earmarked in part
for acquisitions. Microsoft and Dell were up strongly at midday
but caved in at the close.

Traders fear of darkness was apparent as the Dow backslid from
-35 to -125 and the Nasdaq turned slightly negative at the close.
The fear of course comes from going to bed with profits and
waking up the next day to surprises from Asia like we had from
Brazil this morning. Tonight will tell the tale. If Asia does
not melt and the politicians in Brazil work their magic and say
the words analysts want to hear then it is off to the races again.

At the risk of repeating myself too much, there just seems to be
nothing that can derail this market. I took a bloodbath this morning
but when I saw it was not going to get worse I jumped back in and
got some bargains at really good prices. As evidenced by the quick
bounce there were other blue light shoppers there as well.

The VIX settled at 31 after being as high as 35.48 and appears
to confirm the worst to be over.

Apple Computer easily beat the street estimates tody after the
close and more strong earnings are due out soon from MSFT, IBM,
SUNW, SLR, etc. All are expected to do well. No skeletons in the
U.S. economy so look for continued movement upward barring any
sympathy crashes overseas tonight.

Good Luck

Jim Brown

FREE TRIAL READERS
******************
If you like the results you have been receiving we
would welcome you as a permanent subscriber.

The monthly subscription price is 39.95. The quarterly
price is 99.95 which is $20 off the monthly rate.

We would like to have you as a subscriber. You may
subscribe at any time but your subscription will not
start until your free trial is over.

To subscribe you may go to our website at

www.optioninvestor.com

and click on "subscribe" to use our secure credit
card server or you may simply send an email to

 "subscribe@optioninvestor.com"

with your credit card information,(number, exp date, name)
or you may call us at 303-797-0200 and give us the
information over the phone.

You may also fax the information to: 303-797-1333

DISCLAIMER
***********
Please see the disclaimer on our website.


FYI.  Seems like this is something you should ok.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/16/2001 06:02
PM ---------------------------

Alan Larsen@ECT
01/16/2001 01:20 PM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: ABB Override Letter

Here is the revised, and final form, of the ABB override letter for use in
conjunction with the FVP breakout contract for FVP.


Cindy,

Hopefully the paper John Martin and I will work will become the
standard reference for this topic.

Vince

From: Cindy Derecskey@ENRON on 10/30/2000 10:27 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael B Rosen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron, case study at Nordic business schools

Good morning Vince,

Could you please provide with some guidance in relation to Mark's comments
directly below.  I don't have any recollection of recent case studies that we
could send Oddbjorn Tysnes - do you know of any?

I will send him a number of reprints of articles.  Please let me know if you
have anything at your fingertips....

Regards,

Cindy

----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 10/30/2000 10:21 AM -----

	Mark Palmer
	10/30/2000 08:48 AM

		 To: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael B Rosen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy
Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron, case study at Nordic business schools

I don't want to spend a lot of time right now, from this office, pursuing
these opportunities.  But, if we have some case studies "on the shelf" we
could send something to Oddbjorn.

Thanks,

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 10/30/2000 08:45 AM -----

	Oddbj>rn Tysnes <OT@Geelmuyden-Kiese.no>
	10/29/2000 01:36 PM

		 To: "'mark.palmer@enron.com'" <mark.palmer@enron.com>
		 cc: "Thor Lien (E-post)" <thor.lien@enron.com>, "Julie Green (E-post)"
<julie.green@enron.com>, J>rn Bremtun <JB@Geelmuyden-Kiese.no>
		 Subject: Enron, case study at Nordic business schools

Dear Mark,

I want to thank you for two very interesting days and a very pleasant
evening in London at the European PR conference.

As you may remember from the session "Ideas Forum", I presented an idea of
introducing Enron's transformation from an "old" industry/energy company to
an innovative player in the "new" economy as a case study at the leading
Nordic business schools. I have later discussed the idea with Enron's head
of the Nordic region, Thor Lien. He agrees that this could be a good way of
raising the awareness of Enron in the Nordic business community. One reason
for this is that several professors of the Nordic business schools are
frequent speakers at business conferences, they are very often sought by
business reporters to give comments etc. If Enron becomes a "top of mind"
innovative company with these professors, it will help relation-building and
PR work towards the business community.

I understood from you that some US business schools have developed similar
(?) case studies on Enron. Do you or someone else in Enron have access to
such case studies? If so, would it be possible for you to send us copies? It
would be a great help for us.

Best regards,
Oddbjorn Tysnes


Evening Students,
I don't know if you can officially register for this class, but we thought
some of you would be interested in it anyway.? Feel free to join us tomorrow,
saturday, for the first class.?? Sorry about the late notice.
?-Lynelle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------

Haas introduces the first course in

BA 294.7 Social Venture Entrepreneurship

taught be visiting professor

Will Rosenzweig

Will has been involved in founding, financing, leading and advising
socially-progressive companies :?
The Republic of Tea, Odwalla, Ben & Jerry's, Venture Strategy Group, Whole
Foods Markets,
Stonyfield Farms, Just Desserts, Hanna Anderssen, Jamba Juice,
Putumayo World Music, and Leapfrog Toys.

The course provides a framework to design, fund, and manage social venture
businesses.? It is an excellent course for students planning to enter either
business plan competition, enrolled in the other Entrepreneurship classes, or
planning a start-up.?

Meets Saturday 9/9 and Sunday 10/1

For more information: Contact Lynelle Preston
preston@haas.berkeley.edu

(SECOND EMAIL SENT THIS WEEK)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
Due to high demand.........
BA 294.7 Social Venture Entrepreneurship has expanded the class size.?

If you tried to register and it was full, try again now because there are
additional seats available!!

PLEASE NOTE CHANGES and DETAILS BELOW:

When: ??
The class meets 9 - 5 thid Saturday September 9 and 9 - 5 on Sunday October
1.? Please arrive between 8:30 and 9:00 this week to purchase reading
materials.

Where:??
ROOM CHANGE:? We will be in C125

Readings:  ??????
No preparation is necessary for the first class. Course materials will be
available at the first class. Bring a check book.?

Grading:????????
This is a pass/fail class.? Grading will be determined by class participation
and a paper to be discussed in class.

Bonus: ?
Will has offered to do a wine tasting following class.? He is the CEO of
Belvedere Vineyards and Winery in Sonoma.?? www.belvederewinery.com)

Registering:? ??
Follow the normal procedures.? First-years contact Kim Guilfoyle in Student
Services to register.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Mike Bodnar - Vacation

Date:		4/6/2001
Time:		5:00 PM - 6:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Hi, Charla,

I have reviewed the additional fields you described.  Most of them look fine
with me.  I do have some concerns with the questions about birthplace,
citizenship, personal travel, and reason for return from prior assignment.

The questions about birthplace/citizenship are the most risky.  As I have
discussed with others, such questions could create issues of national origin
discrimination, particularly if one's birthplace country is not evident from
any other source.  It also could create a privacy issue if we are asking
questions that are not job-related and consistent with business necessity.
What is the purpose of this inquiry?  Are we trying to determine whether  a
person is eligible to work in a particular country?  If so, it appears that
birthplace and citizenship are not the answers that we need.  We already have
a field on where a person is eligible to work, which would cover the
situation where a person has citizenship in one country, but is on a work
visa to another.   Any other information may not be necessary.

The question about reasons for returning from leave also could unearth
information that we really don't want to keep on a system.  For example, if a
person left because of health reasons, or the birth of a child . . . it
really is not a job-related issue.  What is the purpose of this question?  Is
there a less intrusive way to ask it?

Finally, the question about countries visited for personal reasons also is
asking information that is not job-related.  What is the purpose of that
inquiry?  Is there another way to gather that information?

Let me stress that none of these inquiries is unlawful -- some of them may be
unwise for the reasons I cited above.  If you would like to discuss this
further, please give me a call.

Michelle

Charla Reese@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/02/2000 08:34 PM
To: Michelle Cash@ECT, Sharon Butcher@ENRON
cc: Twanda Sweet@ECT, Ava Syon@ENRON, Jane Allen, Timothy
Callahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: International Information - GIS

Sharon / Michelle

As it has been approximately six weeks from my original request, could you
please advise what timeframe we should expect this request to be completed?
We would like to move forward with enhancements to GIS this quarter.  Please
let me know if there is someone else I should be contacting - thank you!

Charla
x69675
---------------------- Forwarded by Charla Reese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
05/02/2000 08:28 PM ---------------------------

Charla Reese
04/05/2000 11:46 AM
To: Michelle Cash@ECT, Sharon Butcher@ENRON
cc: Jane Allen

Subject: International Information - GIS

Just wanted to touch base with you to see if you had any questions re: the
attached message and check on what timeline we should expect for legal
approval.

Thanks!

Charla
x58293
---------------------- Forwarded by Charla Reese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/30/2000 11:27 AM ---------------------------

Charla Reese
03/23/2000 10:43 AM
To: Michelle Cash@ECT, Sharon Butcher@ENRON
cc: Jane Allen

Subject: International Information - GIS

Michelle / Sharon

We would like to include the following fields in GIS to support our
International Human Resources efforts.  Could you please review for global
legality issues?

Thank you!

Charla
x58293

---------------------- Forwarded by Charla Reese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/23/2000 10:41 AM ---------------------------

Charla Reese
03/22/2000 10:06 AM
To: Kathryn Schultea@Enron
cc: Jane Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Callahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: International Information - GIS

Kathy

As we move forward with enhancements to GIS, the International HR group would
like to capture the following valuable information related to international
skills sets:

Demographics
Birth Place (Country)
Current Residence (Country)
Citizenship (Country)
Passport (# / Issuing Country)

Mobility
Authorization to Work (Countries)
Travel Availability (% Domestic / % International)
Relocation Availability (Y/N)
Relocation Preferences (Countries)

Global Exposure
Countries Visited (Business vs. Leisure - Length of Visit)
Current International Assignee (Y/N)
Current Assignment Location
Former International Assignee (Y/N)
Location and Length of Past Assignment(s)
Reason for Return (As Scheduled, Premature - Change in Business Strategy,
Premature - Personal, Other)

Jane - is there anything you wish to add or change at this point?

Tim - I will run these by Mike to see what SAP can incorporate in the future
(particularly Demographics).

Kathy - Please advise how you envision this process to work; it might be a
good idea to discuss the various ways this information could be laid out -
thanks!

Charla
x58293


We have received an executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   April 5, 2001

Enron Entity:   Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:   Preussag North America, Inc.

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products with the exception of:
Foreign Exchange

Confirming Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Governing Law:   Texas

Copies will be distributed

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com


I am trying to put some figures together for Dave Delainey

First, does anyone know how many MW of capacity that would be available for
CA this Summer if there were limited or no restrictions on environmental
permits.  I understand (via Mary Schoen) that the regional air quality
districts have either expanded the hours (200 to 500) for small units.  Does
anyone have a good number on how many MW this allows to operate into the
market?

Also, does anyone know anything about any power plants idled (for whatever
reason) recently that could be re-started?

Thanks


I suppose by now you've each received the email turd that Anthony threw in
your punchbowl this morning.  When you can, give me a call or email me with
details on how you'd like to settle, (and the response I'm looking for is not
"Never.")  If I don't talk to you today, have a nice "overseas" Thanksgiving.

Brad Richter
713-853-4893


Dear Eric,  ENL will have the latest on the American Gas Association's decision Friday to end its weekly storage reports.   The Washington bureau will have the very latest on the progress of comprehensive energy legislation in Congress.  The big sticking point in the Senate continues to be the proposal to open Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas drilling. Washington Bureau Chief Peter Cook says Bush administration officials are promising to keep the pressure on.   Peter also says there are several specific energy issues being debated on the Hill next week.  A House Committee vote on renewing the Price Anderson Act, which provides insurance for the nuclear industry, should be back on the agenda after a delay this week.     Representative Doug Ose's (R)-California, Government Reform Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Natural Resources and Regulatory Affairs will be looking at natural gas capacity and infrastructure constraints.  The Washington bureau will have news from these events and others on the Hill next week.   ENL's Gale Smith says the bureau will be packed next week with interviews starting Monday.  Pace Consultants Director Dan Foley is stopping by to talk about the effects of a U.S. MTBE ban on other countries that import gasoline during the noon ET newscast.   A memorial service will be held in downtown Houston Monday evening to honor the employees of TradeSpark, eSpeed and Cantor Fitzgerald killed in the September 11 attacks in New York.  The Houston bureau will bring us a report from the service on Tuesday.   On Thursday next week, IBM Chemical & Petroleum Industry Vice President of Marketing Craig Hodges is stopping by the Houston bureau.  Hodges will bring us details on Shell Oil's selection of IBM to pilot the "e-Station" prototype that would create wireless gas stations.   West Coast Correspondent Kym McNicholas will speak with Wright & Talisman Attorney Mike Small from Washington, D.C., on Monday. Small will give his reaction to the results of the Western Systems Power Pool Conference during the 1:00 p.m. ET newscast.   Kym also says we'll have more from former Secretary of State  James Baker and British Airways Chairman Lord Marshall, both speakers at the Invensys Conference, next week.   Jefferies & Company Electricity Utility Analyst Paul Fremont is penciled in from New York.  Fremont will discuss PG&E's bankruptcy reorganization and whether bankruptcy status makes PG?a better investment than Edison.  Catch Fremont in the 9:00 a.m. ET newscast on Monday.   Programming note: On Monday, ENL's weather team will bring you advance temperature readings from the U.S. National Weather Service's MRF model.  With these new maps, we'll have the most accurate temperature readings for up to eight days out.  Log on Monday for forward-looking weather data from ENL.   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap video   (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue, subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now    If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


Attached is an article from the San Diego Union-Tribune stating that a good
solution for the power crisis is energy conservation through the use of
real-time meters. By using the real time meters, consumers will have better
knowledge of energy prices and be less likely to use as much power during
peak times, thus bringing demand into line with current supply. Is there a
way for EES or the New Energy Company to take advantage of this type of
opportunity through their energy management products?


Mike:  Please call me ASAP on this issue on my cell phone 415.505.6633. Got
an idea.  Appreciate it.

Best,
Jeff


alaskaair.com is ranked the #1 airline website according to Forrester, a
leading internet research firm. Forrester cited superior customer service,
consumer satisfaction, ease of use and innovative features, such as Web
Check-In. The next time your plans call for air travel, make it easy on
yourself and start with alaskaair.com.

=================================================
CURRENT DEALS AT ALASKAAIR.COM AND HORIZONAIR.COM
=================================================

IN THIS ISSUE
Save 5%
   1) 5% Savings - It's This Easy - How Does It Work
   2) 5% Savings Rules

Current Web Specials
    1) Web Specials Introduction
    2) Web Specials Valid Dates
    3) Web Specials Fares
    4) Web Specials Rules
    5) Hilton Hotels Specials

************************************************
SAVE 5%
************************************************

________________________________________________________
1) 5% SAVINGS - IT'S THIS EASY - HOW DOES IT WORK

Just purchase your Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air flight online at
alaskaair.com or horizonair.com by April 25, 2001 and you'll save 5% on
travel.
This discount is valid for travel between now and September 13, 2001, so you
can even save on summertime travel! You'll save on EVERY published fare (fares
with a "W" displayed in the rules are not eligible for 5% discount) you
purchase online to all destinations, including Mexico or Canada.

________________________________________________________
2) 5% SAVINGS RULES

The following rules are available at:
http://www2.alaskaair.com/Promo/PromoTerms.asp

The 5% percent discount applies to reservations booked and purchased online at
Alaskaair.com or horizonair.com only. Discount valid for tickets booked and
purchased online from now through April 25, 2001 for travel completed by
September 13, 2001. Discount applies to published fares for flights numbered 1
- 799 and 2000 - 2999, operated by Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air only. Fares
displaying a "W" in the rules are not eligible for 5% off discount. Discount
applies to new bookings only - not valid on pre-existing bookings or
previously
ticketed reservations. Discount cannot be combined with other discounts or
promotions including Web Specials, coupons, senior discounts and all
unpublished fares. Discount does not apply to Alaska Airlines Vacations or
Horizon Air Holidays purchases. Any changes to purchased reservations subject
to US$50 fee per ticket and any applicable changes in fare. Itinerary on
reservations is limited to a maximum of four flight numbers. Ground travel
between an arrival city and your next departure city counts towards the four
flight number limitation. Credit card necessary for online purchase. Discount
applies to fare level prior to all applicable taxes, fees, and surcharges. All
taxes, fees and rules of fare purchased apply, including refund, change and
travel restrictions. Discount subject to change without notice and other
restrictions may apply.

************************************************
CURRENT WEB SPECIALS
************************************************
________________________________________________________
1) WEB SPECIALS INTRODUCTION

Web Specials are a great way to save on flights with Alaska Airlines and
Horizon Air. Web Specials can only be purchased online through the Alaska
Airlines/Horizon Air Web Site. Hurry, seats are limited, prices and markets
subject to change.

Our Web Specials are available via our home page at http://www.alaskaair.com
or
http://www.horizonair.com

________________________________________________________
2) WEB SPECIALS VALID DATES

Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air offer Web Specials for travel:

Originating:
Wednesday, April 25, 2001
Thursday, April 26, 2001
Saturday, April 28, 2001

Returning:
Saturday, April 28, 2001
Monday, April 30, 2001
Tuesday, May 1, 2001

________________________________________________________
3) WEB SPECIALS FARES

All fares quoted in US dollars, without airport fees and segment tax.

Roundtrip Coach fares for travel between:

Anchorage, AK         -     Burbank, CA           -     $269.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Fairbanks, AK         -     $69.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Great Falls, ID       -     $299.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Los Angeles, CA       -     $289.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Oakland, CA           -     $229.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Port Angeles, WA      -     $269.00
Anchorage, AK         -     San Diego, CA         -     $299.00
Anchorage, AK         -     San Jose, CA          -     $239.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Seattle, WA           -     $199.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Spokane, WA           -     $259.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Sun Valley, ID        -     $299.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Vancouver, BC         -     $209.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Wrangell, AK          -     $159.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Yakutat, AK           -     $89.00
Barrow, AK            -     Seattle, WA           -     $439.00
Bethel, AK            -     Seattle, WA           -     $329.00
Boise, ID             -     San Diego, CA         -     $199.00
Boise, ID             -     San Francisco, CA     -     $139.00
Boise, ID             -     San Jose, CA          -     $109.00
Burbank, CA           -     Anchorage, AK         -     $269.00
Burbank, CA           -     Great Falls, ID       -     $199.00
Burbank, CA           -     Sun Valley, ID        -     $199.00
Burbank, CA           -     Vancouver, BC         -     $182.00
Cordova, AK           -     Spokane, WA           -     $309.00
Fairbanks, AK         -     Anchorage, AK         -     $69.00
Great Falls, ID       -     Anchorage, AK         -     $299.00
Great Falls, ID       -     Burbank, CA           -     $199.00
Great Falls, ID       -     Los Angeles, CA       -     $199.00
Great Falls, ID       -     Orange County, CA     -     $209.00
Great Falls, ID       -     Phoenix, AZ           -     $209.00
Great Falls, ID       -     Portland, OR          -     $119.00
Great Falls, ID       -     San Diego, CA         -     $209.00
Great Falls, ID       -     San Francisco, CA     -     $149.00
Great Falls, ID       -     Seattle, WA           -     $109.00
Juneau, AK            -     Sitka, AK             -     $59.00
Juneau, AK            -     Yakutat, AK           -     $89.00
Los Angeles, CA       -     Anchorage, AK         -     $289.00
Los Angeles, CA       -     Great Falls, ID       -     $199.00
Los Angeles, CA       -     Seattle, WA           -     $149.00
Los Angeles, CA       -     Sun Valley, ID        -     $199.00
Oakland, CA           -     Anchorage, AK         -     $229.00
Oakland, CA           -     Port Angeles, WA      -     $139.00
Oakland, CA           -     Portland, OR          -     $99.00
Oakland, CA           -     Spokane, WA           -     $109.00
Oakland, CA           -     Vancouver, BC         -     $118.00
Ontario, CA           -     Port Angeles, WA      -     $189.00
Ontario, CA           -     Portland, OR          -     $149.00
Orange County, CA     -     Great Falls, ID       -     $209.00
Orange County, CA     -     Port Angeles, WA      -     $199.00
Orange County, CA     -     Spokane, WA           -     $199.00
Orange County, CA     -     Sun Valley, ID        -     $209.00
Petersburg, AK        -     Wrangell, AK          -     $49.00
Phoenix, AZ           -     Great Falls, ID       -     $209.00
Phoenix, AZ           -     Port Angeles, WA      -     $209.00
Phoenix, AZ           -     Sun Valley, ID        -     $209.00
Phoenix, AZ           -     Vancouver, BC         -     $182.00
Port Angeles, WA      -     Anchorage, AK         -     $269.00
Port Angeles, WA      -     Oakland, CA           -     $139.00
Port Angeles, WA      -     Ontario, CA           -     $189.00
Port Angeles, WA      -     Orange County, CA     -     $199.00
Port Angeles, WA      -     Phoenix, AZ           -     $209.00
Port Angeles, WA      -     Portland, OR          -     $69.00
Port Angeles, WA      -     San Francisco, CA     -     $139.00
Port Angeles, WA      -     Seattle, WA           -     $59.00
Port Angeles, WA      -     Sun Valley, ID        -     $179.00
Portland, OR          -     Great Falls, ID       -     $119.00
Portland, OR          -     Oakland, CA           -     $99.00
Portland, OR          -     Ontario, CA           -     $149.00
Portland, OR          -     Port Angeles, WA      -     $69.00
Portland, OR          -     San Diego, CA         -     $149.00
Portland, OR          -     Seattle, WA           -     $59.00
Portland, OR          -     Sun Valley, ID        -     $129.00
Sacramento, CA        -     Vancouver, BC         -     $118.00
San Diego, CA         -     Anchorage, AK         -     $299.00
San Diego, CA         -     Boise, ID             -     $199.00
San Diego, CA         -     Great Falls, ID       -     $209.00
San Diego, CA         -     Portland, OR          -     $149.00
San Diego, CA         -     Seattle, WA           -     $169.00
San Diego, CA         -     Sun Valley, ID        -     $209.00
San Diego, CA         -     Vancouver, BC         -     $182.00
San Francisco, CA     -     Boise, ID             -     $139.00
San Francisco, CA     -     Great Falls, ID       -     $149.00
San Francisco, CA     -     Port Angeles, WA      -     $139.00
San Francisco, CA     -     Seattle, WA           -     $99.00
San Francisco, CA     -     Sun Valley, ID        -     $149.00
San Jose, CA          -     Anchorage, AK         -     $239.00
San Jose, CA          -     Boise, ID             -     $109.00
Seattle, WA           -     Anchorage, AK         -     $199.00
Seattle, WA           -     Barrow, AK            -     $439.00
Seattle, WA           -     Bethel, AK            -     $329.00
Seattle, WA           -     Great Falls, ID       -     $109.00
Seattle, WA           -     Los Angeles, CA       -     $149.00
Seattle, WA           -     Port Angeles, WA      -     $59.00
Seattle, WA           -     Portland, OR          -     $59.00
Seattle, WA           -     San Diego, CA         -     $169.00
Seattle, WA           -     San Francisco, CA     -     $99.00
Seattle, WA           -     Sun Valley, ID        -     $149.00
Sitka, AK             -     Juneau, AK            -     $59.00
Spokane, WA           -     Anchorage, AK         -     $259.00
Spokane, WA           -     Cordova, AK           -     $309.00
Spokane, WA           -     Oakland, CA           -     $109.00
Spokane, WA           -     Orange County, CA     -     $199.00
Sun Valley, ID        -     Anchorage, AK         -     $299.00
Sun Valley, ID        -     Burbank, CA           -     $199.00
Sun Valley, ID        -     Los Angeles, CA       -     $199.00
Sun Valley, ID        -     Orange County, CA     -     $209.00
Sun Valley, ID        -     Phoenix, AZ           -     $209.00
Sun Valley, ID        -     Port Angeles, WA      -     $179.00
Sun Valley, ID        -     Portland, OR          -     $129.00
Sun Valley, ID        -     San Diego, CA         -     $209.00
Sun Valley, ID        -     San Francisco, CA     -     $149.00
Sun Valley, ID        -     Seattle, WA           -     $149.00
Vancouver, BC         -     Anchorage, AK         -     $209.00
Vancouver, BC         -     Burbank, CA           -     $182.00
Vancouver, BC         -     Oakland, CA           -     $118.00
Vancouver, BC         -     Phoenix, AZ           -     $182.00
Vancouver, BC         -     Sacramento, CA        -     $118.00
Vancouver, BC         -     San Diego, CA         -     $182.00
Wrangell, AK          -     Anchorage, AK         -     $159.00
Wrangell, AK          -     Petersburg, AK        -     $49.00
Yakutat, AK           -     Anchorage, AK         -     $89.00
Yakutat, AK           -     Juneau, AK            -     $89.00

Additional markets are available at
http://shopping.alaskaair.com/webspecials/start.asp
Check the Alaska Web Specials page periodically as additional markets and
dates
may be added.
________________________________________________________
4) WEB SPECIALS RULES

* Valid on Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air only.
* Seats are limited and may not be available on all flights/dates.
* Offer is for a very limited time and is subject to change without notice.
* Valid on new bookings only.
* Reservations must be made using the Alaska Airlines Web Site. Tickets
require
immediate purchase by credit card when reservations are made.
* Ticketing will be electronic, using Instant Ticket services.
* Tickets are non-refundable, non-changeable and are of no value after the
last
date of your planned travel.
* Fares quoted do not include Passenger Facilities Charges of up to $18 or
segment fees of $2.75 per flight segment. A flight segment is defined as one
takeoff and one landing.
* Other restrictions apply.

________________________________________________________
5) HILTON HOTEL SPECIALS

For special value rates at Hilton Hotels in Alaska Airlines cities visit the
Hilton web site at http://www.hilton.com/specials/values/akairvalues.html

========================================================
You are receiving this message today because you subscribed to our Email
Notification Service. While we'd be pleased to continue to tell you about our
great products and prices, you can unsubscribe by visiting our Web site at
http://www2.alaskaair.com/listserv/webmail.asp

Please do not respond to this message. Mail sent to this address cannot be
answered.


Marty, no agenda on this one at all.  Given, the change in Enron Industrial
Markets towards building the paper and steel commodity markets and less so on
the outsourcing product, I just wanted your opinion on whether this is a deal
we should do especially given the sales cycle is largely completed.  I
believe that Rodney and his team want to finish this deal but given other
priorities they would like to transition the deal to EES.  Ultimately, the
value (TCV, earnings, up-sell, resume) would benefit Enron more in EES than
ENA.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000
09:11 AM ---------------------------
From: Marty Sunde@EES on 10/15/2000 09:07 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: GE Plastics Facts

Dave,
On a more private note, what was the motivation for this note, especially
copying Frevert and Pai?
Are we (EES) being uncooerative and your purpose was to raise visibility?
Can you help me with what your thinking is what you would view as a desirable
outcome?


ATTENTION - ALL USERS OF THE INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE!

New Version 7.23 of The IntercontinentalExchange Goes Live
The IntercontinentalExchange is pleased to announce that on Monday, March 19,
2001, the new Version 7.23
of the exchange will go live. Version 7.23 includes many new features and
enhancements as follows:

ENHANCED COUNTERPARTY FILTERS
Daily Dollar Limits (Notional Value $US)
Credit Floor
Daily Dollar Override
Number of Counterparties
Email Notification

ORDER FUNCTIONALITY
Messaging and Chat Facility
Reserve Quantity
Surplus Posting
OCO's
Hold Bids/Hold Offers
Momentary Flash
"Pinned" Markets
Order Maintenance

DEAL FUNCTIONALITY
Deal Warning Limits
Deal Confirmation "Notes"
Deal Book Layout

SCREEN ENHANCEMENTS
Market Statistics
Ticker Filtering
Trading Clock
Check Your Connection
System Health Indicator
Number of Users Logged In

PORTFOLIO FUNCTIONALITY
Portfolio Construction
Edit Options and Columns
NON-STANDARD STRIPS
Custom Products
Notification

MULTI-COMPANY FUNCTIONALITY
Get All The Details
If you have questions about using the new features and functionality of
Version 7.23, please don't hesitate to
call your Account Representative, your Customer Service Representative, or
our 24-hour help desk at (800) 778-8464 /
(770) 738-2101. A complete explanation of the new features and functionality
of Version 7.23 can also be found in
the release notes available on the Intercontinental Exchange website.

To view and download the release notes,
1.      Go to http://www.intercontinentalexchange.com
2.      Click "Downloads" on the menu
3.      Enter your user I.D. and password at the prompt
4.      Click "Release Notes" on the menu
5.      Click "View Release Notes Here".
Note: The release notes are available in PDF file format. If you do not have
a PDF file reader installed on your computer,
you can download and install the Adobe Acrobat Reader for free from their
website
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep.html

Important! Installation Is Required
It is important that the new Version 7.23. be installed on your system.
Previous versions of the IntercontinentalExchange
software, such as 6.10 and 6.11, will no longer work after close of business
on Friday, March 16. If you are a trader or
user of the system, it is likely that your company IT contact is already
arranging the new installation for you. However,
if you have any questions or concerns about installing the new version,
please call your IntercontinentalExchange
Account Representative, your Customer Service Representative, or our 24-hour
help desk at (800) 778-8464 /
(770) 738-2101.