We have been asked to set this entity up for financial trading.  It's part of
our JV with Texaco.  Hal Bertram (X31865) is a good contact person if you
have questions about the Bridgeline companies.  Thanks.  Sara


My new e:mail address ismohannes@bellsouth.net


Received: from mcafee.bracepatt.com by mail.bracepatt.com; Mon, 23 Jul 2001
14:57:36 -0500
Received: FROM [134.186.70.194] BY mcafee.bracepatt.com ; Mon Jul 23 15:12:33
2001 -0500
X-Proxy: keymaster.bracepatt.com protected
Received: from nic.cpuc.ca.gov by [134.186.70.194]          via smtpd (for
mail.bracepatt.com [205.138.132.1]) with SMTP; 23 Jul 2001 19:51:47 UT
Received: from [162.15.7.254] (exchserver1 [162.15.5.63]) by nic.cpuc.ca.gov
(8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA12468; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from no.name.available by [162.15.7.254]          via smtpd (for
nic.cpuc.ca.gov [162.15.7.1]) with SMTP; 23 Jul 2001 19:51:33 UT
Received: by exchserver1.cpuc.ca.gov with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <PPV50R56>; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:54:11 -0700
Message-ID: <2AFE4270DD2AD511B89400005A42A7B039AA95@EXCHSERVER2>
From: "Morris, Harvey Y." <hym@cpuc.ca.gov>
To: "'Curtis Wagner'" <curtis.wagner@ferc.fed.us>, dshaffer@akllp.com,
kminesinger@akllp.com, rrich@bracepatt.com, moloughl@brattle.com,
jhmcgrew@brudergentile.com, jmmarcoux@brudergentile.com,        "Morris,
Harvey Y." <hym@cpuc.ca.gov>,        "Bromson, Jonathan"  <jab@cpuc.ca.gov>,
daniel.collins@elpaso.com,        greg.jones@elpaso.com,
judy.heineman@elpaso.com, mark.cook@elpaso.com,
jlgreene@energyadvocates.com,        Edith Gilmore
<edith.gilmore@ferc.fed.us>,        Marcia Hooks
<marcia.hooks@ferc.fed.us>,        Martha Altamar
<martha.altamar@ferc.fed.us>,        Ruby Meek <ruby.meek@ferc.fed.us>,
jmoriarty@fw-law.com,        kbedwards@gkrse-law.com, jfagan@hewm.com,
PMohler@hewm.com,        DLBeresford@HHLAW.com, GSterling@HHLAW.com,
bjost@huberlaw.com,        dhuard@manatt.com, jgregg@mbolaw.com,
lochsenhirt@mbolaw.com,        dmcwash@mshpc.com, frl3@pge.com,
sandrar@prestongates.com,        GBaker@Sempra.com, wlansinger@Sempra.com,
DROBINSO@skadden.com,        GRICHMAN@skadden.com, JSherman@skadden.com,
WSCHERMA@skadden.com,        ryspeed-bost@verner.com, "'imoreno@BCJLaw.com'"
<imoreno@BCJLaw.com>
Cc: "Pocta, Robert M." <rmp@cpuc.ca.gov>
Subject: RE: CPUC Rebuttal Testimony on Affiliate Abuse Issues. FERC Docke t
No. RP00-241-000
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:54:06 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C113B1.3B4CE9C0"

Attached hereto is the CPUC's rebuttal testimony (without exhibits) in the
CPUC's complaint case, FERC Docket No. RP00-241-000. I have sent copies of
this testimony (with accompanying exhibits) via overnight courier to active
parties and via regular mail to all parties on the FERC's service list. This
testimony does not contain any protected  materials.

Harvey Y. Morris

Attached hereto is the CPUC's rebuttal  testimony (without exhibits) in the
CPUC's complaint case, FERC Docket No.  RP00-241-000. I have sent copies of
this testimony (with accompanying  exhibits) via overnight courier to active
parties and via regular mail to all  parties?on the FERC's service list. This
testimony does not contain any  protected??materials.
?
Harvey Y. Morris?
?
 - CPUC01-#102588-v1-rebuttal_testimony_of_Pocta_7_20_01_.doc


I know Chip personally, as, of course, does Leslie.  Leslie may be better
able to speak to Chip's judicial background.  Chip is a fine man and deeply
involved in his community.  Any chance we could pass word on to Sen. Dom.'s
office?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/21/2001 03:26 PM -----

	Leslie Lawner
	01/19/2001 11:41 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: federal judgeship

Steve, I know you are overloaded, but maybe you can tell me if Cynthia or
someone else can help on this.  Thanks.  And I will tell Chip that you don't
spell your name "Cane."
----- Forwarded by Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron on 01/19/2001 11:40 AM -----

	"Judge William P. Johnson" <div8@fifthdistrictcourt.com>
	01/19/2001 10:06 AM

		 To: "Leslie Lawner" <llawner@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: federal judgeship

Leslie:  I have delivered a letter and resume to Senator Domenici's office.
I am attaching a copy of my letter to Senator Domenici and my resume.  There
are already a couple of letters sent to Senator Domenici on my behalf;
however, I do not know the best way to time this thing because President
Bush has to get his administration in place and there are a lot of positions
that will require Senate confirmation and everything is running behind
because of all the post election issues.  If you get a chance to talk with
Steve Cane about my application, I would certainly appreciate it.  I am sure
there are people at Enron close to Senator Domenici and he is the one who
will be making the call, so I would be interested in knowing what you and
Steve think.  In any event, thanks for all your help and let me know if the
attachments do not come through with this e-mail.  I am still somewhat
incompetent when it comes to e-mail technology although I think it is a
great way to communicate.  As an aside, in divorce cases where the two
parties have internet access, I require them to communicate by e-mail.
Thanks and I'll see you back in Roswell.  Chip

 - domenici.wpd
 - RESUME.WPJ


I changed the end term date on cglf k#50250 from 10/31/2000 to 7/31/2001.


Your thoughts??

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Michael Reddy" <Mreddy@epsa.org>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 5:13 PM
To:	acomnes@enron.com; Hawkins, Bernadette; Nersesian, Carin; Nicolay, Christi L.; Fulton, Donna; Steffes, James D.; Scheuer, Janelle; Hartsoe, Joe; Shelk, John; Noske, Linda J.; Robertson, Linda; Alvarez, Ray; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Shapiro, Richard; Novosel, Sarah; Mara, Susan; Lindberg, Susan; Hoatson, Tom
Subject:	EPSA Draft Comments on Pipeline Capacity Recall NOPR

MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
      Gas Issues Working Group

FROM: Jim Steffes, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
           John Orr, Gas Issues Working Group Chair
           Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy
           Jack Cashin, Senior Manager of Policy

DATE: 11/9/2001

RE: EPSA Draft Comments on Pipeline Capacity Recall
      NOPR
?			Comments due November 19th
?	Conference Call November 14th
?
As discussed on the last Gas Issues Working Group conference call, attached are draft EPSA comments on FERC's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) on pipeline capacity recall.  EPSA opposes the NOPR because it (a) will reduce competition in the secondary market for transportation services and (b) may reduce the pipeline operational flexibility needed by electric generators.   Thus, EPSA urges the Commission not to impose a broad based recall requirement throughout the natural gas industry but rather gain experience with this difficult issue in individual Order No. 637 proceedings.

Please review the draft and forward any comments or proposed changes to the draft to Jack Cashin at EPSA at jcashin@epsa.org by noon on Thursday, November 15th so that we can make a timely filing by Monday, November 19th.  EPSA will hold a conference call on Wednesday, November 14th, at 1:00 P.M. (EST) to discuss the draft.  To access the call, dial 1-800-937-6563.  Ask for the Jack Cashin/EPSA Call.

Attachment

 - GasDayaheadRechallNOPR DRAFT.DOC


Thanks  -- definitely not too late.  --Sally

Rob Milnthorp
11/20/2000 11:52 AM
To: Bruce Smith/HOU/ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Performance Reviews

I apologize for not getting the requested feedback reviews completed by Nov
17. However, I completed them over the weekend and I hope that its not too
late to include my  feedback  in your compiled reviews.

Regards
Milnthorp


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/27/99 11:38
AM ---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/27/99 11:30:20 AM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FINAL - JANUARY 2000 NEEDS

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/27/99
11:36 AM ---------------------------

KIM NOVSEK BIZIK
12/27/99 10:48 AM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Dale Ray
East/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Darren Espey/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Marianne Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Joanne
Swogger/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: FINAL - JANUARY 2000 NEEDS

The volumes listed below are Final volumes - note that the deadline for BUG
has
changed!  I still need to give you Peco volumes.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Novsek Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/27/99 11:44 AM ---------------------------

KIM NOVSEK BIZIK
12/27/99 09:43 AM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Dale Ray
East/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Darren Espey/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Marianne Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Joanne
Swogger/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: JANUARY 2000 NEEDS

Good Morning.  I have listed my needs below for all but Peco.
The red can be off Anr or Tgt.  Please advise.
The green is done - just need the activity number.
I have also included my nom deadline - I have a nom due today - LILCO.  Please
advise.

ANR
 CG&E- deliveries to Springboro 1550 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is
12:30 on the 30th - note this can be served off TGT

Tetco
 BUG  145 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the
28th
 Con Ed 261 dth/day  (estimate ONLY) LDC Nom Deadline is 2
pm on the 30th
 PECO
 PA Gas
 PSEG  1696 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 10 pm on the 29th
 Etown  23 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the
29th
 NJN  7528 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 12:30 est on
the 30th

CNG - PA gas for PECO /day  (If we have a problem flowing this much,
please let me know as soon as possible so we can buy delivered gas to PECO's
gate from one of the other suppliers)

Transco
 LILCO  382 dth/day    (capacity release is also for
382) LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the 27th
 PSEG  189 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 10 pm on the
29th
 S Jersey  113 dth/day Transco nom must show Enduser # 012224 to
be confirmed- LDC Deadline is 12:30 on the 30th
 Piedmont 1113 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline was 10:30 est on
the 22nd - just need activity number now
 PSNC  190 dth/day (CES will get the capacity release for
this from PSNC)
   The supply will be from PSNC's pool #7620 (this is
their station 85 pool)

Texas Gas
 DP&L  1298 dth/day  LDC Nom Deadline is
12:30 est on the 30th
 CG&E  1550 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 12:30 on
the 30th - note this can be served off TGT


[IMAGE]

    [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]Explore  more savings .....    [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]Learn  more .....

  Search  Amazon.com for:

 We hope you  enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future  e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please visit the Help page  Updating  Subscriptions and Communication Preferences  and click the Customer  Communication Preferences link.   Please note  that this e-mail was sent to the following address:  jforney@enron.com

[IMAGE]


Start Date: 2/27/01; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022710.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/27/01
  TIE_POINT: MEAD_2_WALC
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ALB
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/27/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_HUSKIES
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Thanks for the reminder!  Would you please verify with Sheila Glover that
Tuesday works for her and how many people will be attending?  Then, we need
to add Sam, Stephanie, Cheryl and me.  SS

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Kaye Ellis
	02/02/2001 11:30 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Meeting from 12 noon - 2 pm on Tuesday

Sara,

Am I supposed to be ordering lunch for your meeting on Tues?

Kaye


Attached is a new draft of the letter to John Pope with all comments
received.  Dick Ingersoll will send this out to TVA tomorrow.  If you have
any other additions, please get them to me today.


The Internet provides instant access to global information, products and
services.
Technological advancements, such as faster computer processors and Internet
connections, make access easier and more efficient.

In keeping with Enron's vision to be the best company to work for in the
U.S.,
the Company is considering offering a program that will empower eligible
employees -- and their families -- by providing access to this new technology
from their homes.

The attached survey will give the program administrators the information
needed
to assess Enron employee participation.  Your feedback is critical and we
would
appreciate you taking a few moments to give us your opinion.  Click the link
below
to begin the survey or copy and paste the URL address in your Internet
browser
address line.

 http://hrweb.enron.com/corp/survey/connection/default.asp


Carter Perrin is back from Italy & will be sailing in the V-15 races on
Friday night.  He has promised 10,000 Lira to any HYC'ers who can beat him on
the racecourse.  There also will be a DJ, Cash Bar & Buffet afterwards so
bring down your friends.  We are trying to beat the record of 22 boats set
earlier this summer.

We will be going to Taco Milagro (Westheimer & Kirby) on Thursday night from
7-9 PM.

We are attending the USA vs. South Africa Rugby game at Robinson Stadium (UH)
on Dec. 1 @ 2 PM.  HYC Tailgate party & BBQ before the game.  Purchase your
tickets online at:

www.usa-eagles.org/tickets/index.html

DAMIEN GODDARD


NEWSMAKER PROFILE
Nettie Hoge
Taking on power
Consumer advocate revels in uphill battle
Monday, April 30, 2001 San Francisco Chronicle

Given a choice, Nettie Hoge would rather be out in her garden right about
now, digging in the dirt.
Instead, the head of The Utility Reform Network is digging into California's
energy mess, making sure the average Joe doesn't take it in the kisser as
lawmakers, regulators and utility brass hats try to keep the lights on and
utilities afloat.
It's grueling work, full of long hours that leave precious little time for
the gardening Hoge so adores. Not that she's complaining. Hoge, 50, honestly
loves her job and insists she wouldn't do anything else.
"I've got a mutant gene," she said with a laugh as she relaxed, for just a
moment, in a spartan office littered with messy piles of paperwork. "I've
always wanted to do this."
TURN has been keeping tabs on companies like Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and
Pacific Bell for more than 25 years. Hoge and her crew lobby the Public
Utilities Commission, counsel lawmakers, analyze reports and file the
occasional lawsuit. They are, in short, professional gadflies who represent
the public in a system that some say favors big business.
"The biggest protector of the consumer, by far, has been TURN," said Bob
Gnaizda, public policy director for the Greenlining Institute in San
Francisco.
"(Hoge) has made TURN into the leading consumer utility advocate in the
nation."
It's not glamorous work, nor is it particularly lucrative. Hoge, a lawyer by
training, took a pay cut when she accepted the $75,000-a-year job in 1995.
And, truth be told, most folks have no idea Hoge is in their corner.
"There are other rewards," she said. "You don't get the adoration of Joe
Citizen standing up and yelling, 'Yay TURN!' But there's an excitement about
being involved in the discussions where the big decisions are made."
The youngest of four children, Hoge bounced around the middle of the country
as she grew up, following her career Army officer father from Kansas to
Oklahoma to Texas.
"All the places where you can shoot big guns," she joked.
Hoge graduated from high school in Pullman, Wash. After a stint at the
University of Southern California, she graduated Phi Beta Kappa from
Washington State University and earned a law degree from the University of
San Francisco.
Hoge's entire career has been spent protecting the underdog. During a two-
year stint as a law school graduate at Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison in San
Francisco, "I got into trouble for doing too much pro bono work," Hoge
recalled. "The partners would come around each month to check our billable
hours. Mine were always zero."
Since taking the helm almost six years ago, Hoge has led TURN to some
impressive consumer victories. They include persuading the Public Utilities
Commission to create a $352 million fund to underwrite rural telephone
service and bringing an end to ratepayer subsidies of PG&E's Diablo Canyon
nuclear power plant in 2002.
Hoge, a stickler for detail, has a reputation for giving exhaustive answers
to even mundane questions.
"Everybody agrees she knows what she's talking about," said Harvey
Rosenfield, president of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights. "In
many respects, TURN is the intellectual force in this debate. Those of us who
are deeply involved in this issue rely upon Nettie to lay out the facts for
us. "
Hoge is surprised people think her wonkish, but admits she is circumspect.
"My big fear is being marginalized and having people think we (at TURN) don't
know what we're talking about," she said. "Maybe I overcompensate."
Few doubt Hoge's smarts, but she has plenty of critics among the utilities,
lawmakers and lobbyists she has crossed swords with over the years. However,
none of them will say anything publicly.
"We have no comment on her," said Shawn Cooper, a spokesman for Pacific Gas
and Electric Corp., the parent company of the foundering utility.
It was the same story with Southern California Edison and many of the
legislators who have criticized Hoge and TURN in recent years.
Hoge isn't surprised her adversaries are keeping mum.
"There's nothing for them to gain by saying anything negative about us
because the public is on our side," she said.
Still, TURN has drawn criticism from Carl Wood, generally considered the most
ardent consumer advocate on the PUC.
"Frankly, I would have expected myself to be on the same page with (TURN)
more than I actually am," Wood said. "I'm not sure they wholeheartedly
believe in regulation, and I think it comes from a distrust of regulators.
But maybe I'm taking it personally."
Wood chastised TURN for supporting utility divestiture of generating plants
as California's deregulation effort got under way. And he said Hoge places
too much emphasis on the utilities' role in the energy mess instead of
focusing on the profiteering of power generators.
"The utilities have some culpability, but they are not the main driver behind
the crisis," Wood said. "TURN's interventions do not reflect that reality."
Still, he gave TURN high marks and credited Hoge with making it a far more
effective advocate.
Hoge admits she has had her hands full with the energy crisis, saying she and
her staff "are trying to keep our health and sanity."
Asked if she would have joined TURN if she had known how crazy California's
energy market would become and how hard she would have to work, Hoge was
characteristically wary.
"I don't think anyone would want to sign up for this," she said after a
moment's pause. "On the one hand, it's very serious, very rewarding work. But
on the other hand, sometimes you're just beating your head against the wall."
Still, Hoge doesn't plan to give up the fight anytime soon.
"But at some point I'd like to retreat and spend some time contemplating the
forest for the trees."
Or the garden for the plants.
Nettie Hoge
-- Age: 50.
-- Residence: Oakland.
-- Job: Executive director, The Utility Reform Network, October 1995 to
present. The utility and telecommunications industry watchdog group in San
Francisco represents consumers before the Public Utilities Commission, the
Legislature and elsewhere.
-- Education: Bachelor's degree in communications, Phi Beta Kappa, from
Washington State University, 1976. Law degree, cum laude, from University of
San Francisco, 1985.
-- Background: Most of Hoge's 25-year career has been spent protecting the
little guy, first as a social worker and later as an attorney with Consumers
Union and the California Department of Insurance under Insurance Commissioner
John Garamendi.


Looks like LN's !0 point "Dead Deer Still Walking" from a couple years ago!

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 2:54 PM
To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; chet_fenner@bmc.com; knipe3@msn.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com
Subject: RE: JOE IS A DEER HUNTING SUPERSTAR

where did mertz shoot his?
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Erik Wollam; Parks, Joe; chet_fenner@bmc.com; knipe3@msn.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com
Subject: JOE IS A DEER HUNTING SUPERSTAR

Gentlemen,

            Please access www.mertzranch.com <http://www.mertzranch.com/> and witness my photographic skills and Joe's obvious hunting skills as a picture of Joe's 9 point is being proudly displayed on Michael's web-site!!!! Methinks using Joe's deer and my photographical skills as a shameless plug for Michaels ever expanding  Outfitting Monopoly?.should grant us (hunter and photographer) certain royalties normally associated with this sort of unlicensed usage of this form of media. Basically, we need a price break for use of picture!!!! Anyway, pretty cool seeing your very own photo displayed on a website!!!!

                                                                                PIGGY

************************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. and/or its relevant affiliate(s) and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
************************************************************************


Dear ALP Company Representatives:

Thank you again for your participation in the ALP Company Day at Rice
University. We are pleased to inform you that your project proposal has been
chosen for the 2001 ALP program. The following students will be working on
your project:

CALABRESE, luigi????????luigical@rice.edu
GHOSE, Ivy??????????????ghosei@rice.edu
GHOSH, Ronnie???ghoshr@rice.edu
IQBAL, Syed?????????????iqbal@rice.edu
SUD, Pravas?????????????pravas@rice.edu
WOMACK, Charles?cwomack@rice.edu

The faculty liaisons for your project are:

BARRETT, Deborah????????????????barrett@rice.edu
UECKER, Will????????????????????uecker@rice.edu
LOUGHRIDGE, Dennis??????loughrid@rice.edu

A representative from the student team will contact you soon to set up a
meeting time. If you need to contact your team, I have included the students'
email addresses. They check their email on a regular basis, so this is a good
way to communicate with them.

Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this information.
Again, thank you for your interest in the Jones School. Best wishes for a
great project!

==============================================================
Carrie Chamberlin Miller
Director of MBA Program
Rice University
6100 Main Street, MS 531
Houston, Texas 77005-1892
Phone: (713) 348-5260
Fax: (713) 348-5251
E-mail: cmiller@rice.edu
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jgs/

Pamela Castro
MBA Program Associate
Rice University
Phone: 713-348-6223
FAX: 713-348-5251
E-mail: castro@rice.edu


Tom,

Below is a copy of the Weekly Report from October 8 through October 12, 2001.

Please note a few changes from last weeks report.  The Potential Revenue Generating transaction count as well as the Potential Revenue from those transactions has changed to reflect new Nom Logic Pricing as discussed last week.

An amendment template has been created and will be sent to customers for discussion purposes at the appropriate time in the revisions process.  We will monitor customers who have received this template in the upcoming weekly reports.

Finally, we have included a new table in the report which reflects our Counterparties Current Trading Agreement Status.  This will include a reporting of which companies have ISDA Agreements, ENA Agreements, Counterparty Agreements, or No agreements in place which should give us a more accurate idea of where our hang ups will be in the legal process.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks

Forrest


Is anybody up for going to Two Rows tonight?  I promise I won't get AS drunk
tonight.  We'll be there around 8:00.  Be there or be SQUARE!.

Eric


----- Forwarded by Sharonda Stephens/Corp/Enron on 01/24/2001 11:11 AM -----

	"ANN SCHMIDT, ENRON CORP." <ENRONPR@bloomberg.net>
	01/24/2001 11:09 AM

		 To: sharonda.stephens@ENRON.COM
		 cc:
		 Subject: (BN  ) Bush Says California Must Resolve Power Crisis, Sen.

                      enron story

Bush Says California Must Resolve Power Crisis, Sen. Reid Says
1/24/1 10:51 (New York)

     (For more on California's electricity crisis, see {EXTRA
<GO>.})

     Washington, Jan. 24 (Bloomberg) -- President George W. Bush
said California can't look to federal help after the expiration in
two weeks of two emergency orders requiring power providers and
natural gas suppliers to sell into California, Senator Harry Reid
said.
     ``He indicated that the two-week extension was the last,''
Reid told reporters after he and other congressional leaders met
with Bush.
     ``California's problems are lapping over into other states,''
said Reid, a Democrat who represents neighboring Nevada. Bush
``indicated it was a problem that California had to solve for
itself.''
     U.S. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham said yesterday he
extended the Clinton administration's orders to give California's
lawmakers time to make policy changes needed to resolve the
state's energy supply problems. The orders were extended through
Feb. 6.
     After that, California must make its own arrangements with
out-of-state energy suppliers and no extension will be granted,
Abraham said. California Governor Gray Davis, who requested the
extension, agreed with Abraham that no further extensions will be
necessary, the Energy Department said.

--Heidi Przybyla in Washington (202) 624-1884 or
hprzybyla@bloomberg.net/ rdm /wfs

Story illustration: For a chart comparing the performance of
Edison and PG&E with the Dow Jones Utilities for the past year,
click on {UTIL <Index> COMP D <GO>} or enter the command. Enter
EIX US <Equity> in the second box, and PCG US <Equity> in the
third. Press <GO>.

Companies:
PCG US <Equity> CN
EIX US <Equity> CN
DUK US <Equity> CN
ENE US <Equity> CN
CPN US <Equity> CN
REI US <Equity> CN
NRG US <Equity> CN
WMB US <Equity> CN
SO US <Equity> CN
MIR US <Equity> CN
AES US <Equity> CN
DYN US <Equity> CN
13622Z <Equity> CN
SRE US <Equity> CN

NI EXE
NI COS
NI UTI
NI NRG
NI ELC
NI SUM
NI GAS
NI LAW
NI GEN
NI GOV
NI CMD
NI BON
NI WNEWS
NI US
NI CA
NI ERG
NI DC
NI OIL

-0- (BN ) Jan/24/2001 15:51 GMT


The person's name at Calpine is Jim Macias (he's a vice president there).  His number 408.995.5115.

Thanks again, Marchris.  How'd the conversation go?  If there's anything that I can do to help, don't hesitate.

Best,
Jeff


David,

Thanks for your note.  Glad to hear you and yours are well.

We docked in Southampton on Monday morning so I was already in our London office on Tuesday and just back from lunch when the news started coming through.  I was traveling with a couple of friends from NYC (Amanda McGovern, Noble Black's UVA classmate, and Linda Hayman, her mom and a friend of mine from my Skadden days) so it was rather tense for a while as we tried to find their friends but everyone came through pretty well.  Our return had been scheduled for Wednesday of that week so of course we were stranded in London but made it back Sunday.  Not that we were having much fun, but there were worse places to be stranded.  I felt bad for the QE2 passengers on their way from Southampton to NYC.  They would have gotten the news on their first day at sea and had to spend what should have been a pleasant cruise thinking about events and worrying.

I've heard good things from both Anne and Brad about your meeting here in Houston.  Thanks for getting into that.  It sounds like exactly what we needed.  I have been talking to Barbara and she will check with Frank concerning the letter.

I'll look forward to chatting sometime soon so I can hear what's been happening with you and how you are coping.  Hope it is all going as smoothly as possible.  Linda tells me that New York is a changed place -- nearly empty evenings and weekends.

Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Hudanish, David M." <DHudanish@brobeck.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Hudanish+2C+20David+20M+2E+22+20+3CDHudanish+40brobeck+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 10:14 AM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:

Mark,

First off, I hope that your family and friends are all well.  I feel very
lucky in that my family, friends and colleagues are all okay.  I kept
thinking about you and wasn't sure if you were stuck on the ship at the
time.  What happened - how did you get back?

On a more mundane, although important, note I thought I would update you on
some recent events.

We had a great meeting a few weeks back with Anne Koehler, Brad Richter and
Rex Shelby.  We helped them consider the various legal and practical issues
that would face Enron should you chose to host internet sites for customers
(as opposed to licensing the software to a company and letting them host
their own sites).  As it turns out, the business team decided to do some
more analysis before proceeding.

Pam Kavieff has asked us for help with eProjects (online auction sites for
construction projects) and we have provided documents to her team.

Barbara Gray has also asked for help on a project involving AEP.  I think
she wanted to clear this with you.

In that regard, I just confirmed with my assistant that I did not receive a
signed fee letter back from Frank Sayer ( I had sent one to him after we
meet with him several months ago).  We can either try to find that letter
and see if Frank signed it (or have him sign it) or I can send a new letter
to your attention.  In fairness to you, there may be a few things you need
to review (e.g., fax, copying charges come to mind).

Best regards,

David
______________________
DAVID M. HUDANISH
BROBECK
Voice:  212.237.2502
Fax:     212.586.7878
1633 Broadway, 47th Floor
New York, NY 10016

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


This has been a great year for RBAC and GPCM.
During the year we have doubled to 10 the number of GPCM licensees.
This means we've also doubled the number of wonderful people we've trained
and are supporting.
And, I sincerely mean it when I say it has been a real pleasure working
with you all.
One of the things we stress when we are selling GPCM is that it takes a
strong commitment on the part of the licensee, a commitment to find skilled
and dedicated people to make optimal use of this sophisticated tool.  And,
I'm happy to report that we have that quality in the GPCM teams we work
with.
Next year we have some big challenges.  We will be converting the system
from Office 97 to Office 2000 and will also need to make sure it will run
in the Windows 2000 environment.
We will be adding new flexibility in defining our transportation zone price
curves to enable users, especially pipeline users, to test variations of
pricing strategies for their impacts on basis and utilization.
We will be adding a capability for modeling future FT contracting.
We will upgrade our existing Database Comparison program to allow you to
select those items you want to have automatically updated in your own
databases.
We will continue to work with RDI to improve pipeline and storage
infrastructure representations, to provide interfaces between GASdat and
GPCM, and to give you regular optional updates for your own databases.
We are beginning to plan out a new website dedicated to GPCM licensees (and
possibly prospects).  We have acquired gpcm.rbac.com and gpcm.net for this
purpose.
In making these various changes, we look also to you, our existing
licensees, for enhancement and improvement ideas.  We are planning to
conduct interviews of our licensees during the next 30 - 60 days to find
out what you like, but also what you would like to see improved, as well as
some new ideas for GPCM.

I would like to thank the following people for their contributions to GPCM
during 1999.

o Liam Leahy for his excellent marketing, sales, and planning support
o Charles Carr for his quality work on our website and support with subtle
Visual Basic programming issues
o Richard Berman for thorough research on design tools and skilled Windows
programming
o Richard McBride for continuing support and development of his EMNET
optimization program
o Aaron and James Brooks for design and production of the PowerPoint
pipeline maps now available in GPCM
o Mike Farina and RDI for their continuing improvement of the GPCM data and
GASdat database
o GPCM users who have found data bugs and reported them to use so that we
could get them corrected
o GPCM users who have suggested new features which would make GPCM a better
product
o GPCM users who have given us sales leads during the year
o GPCM users who have used GPCM to help their companies make better plans
and decisions, which is, after all, the purpose for which it was designed

We hope all of you have a wonderful holiday season and look forward to an
even better year 2000.

Bob Brooks


Sara -
I sent them to him last week (Aug. 23) via interoffice mail.  He should have
received them by now.  I'll send another copy -  is interoffice mail not the
best method for sending to other offices?

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 08/28/2000 04:21 PM
To: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Gregg Penman in our Chicago office

Stephanie:  I sent you a request last week for Gregg.  Could you please send
Gregg the boilerplate?  Thanks.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 04:20 PM -----

	Gregg Penman@ENRON
	08/28/2000 02:02 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Gregg Penman in our Chicago office

Sara - I still have not received the ISDA Master or Credit Support Annex.
Could you please let me know the status?  Thanks for your help.

Gregg

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 08/23/2000 05:22 PM
To: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Gregg Penman in our Chicago office

Stephanie:  Please send the boilerplate ISDA Master Agreement and Credit
Support Annex to Gregg Penman in our Chicago office.  Thanks.  Sara


Hotel res works for us.

	"Eldon Sellers" <eldon@interx.net>
	12/21/2000 05:10 PM
	Please respond to eldon

		 To: "Cameron Sellers \(E-mail\)" <camsell@pacbell.net>, "Cameron Sellers
\(E-mail 2\)" <cameron@perfect.com>, "Eldon \(E-mail\)"
<eldonsellers@hotmail.com>, "Eldon Sellers \(E-mail\)" <eldon@interx.net>,
"Nancy Sellers \(E-mail\)" <Nancy.Sellers@mondavi.com>, "Jeffrey Dasovich
\(E-mail\)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Prentice Sellers \(E-mail\)"
<psellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, "Prentice Sellers \(E-mail 2\)"
<Psellers@pacbell.net>, "Scott Laughlin \(E-mail\)" <scottwl@hotmail.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Reservation Confirmation

This is what I received from the Westwood Marquis which has undergone a
renovation.  (I replied and told them to correct the address.)  Let me know
if this is OK.  I don't know if  we can find a cheaper place, but if you
think this rate is too high I can try.  Also, I made reservations to go to
Burbank on Dec. 31 using Southwest Airlines and leaving from Oakland at
10:40 am, arriving at 11:40.  Returning on Jan. 1 at 8:15 pm and arriving at
9:20.  However, I learned from Cameron that all but your mother and I will
be going on Dec. 30 so I  will cancel that part of the reservation.  I don't
know  what your plans are for returning so I will not be making any  other
reservations unless I hear from you.  I originally made the returning
reservation at the time I did so that if we came back to the house on Monday
to watch football games and  play games we would have some time to do that.
If we don't do that we could possibly get an earlier flight back.  Your
mother doesn't want to come  back too late, so your mother and I couldn't
possibly watch a movie if Hef has one planned for later, but you might
consider that possibility.  Our check-in time at the W is 3:00 pm,  possibly
earlier.  I assume you got my message left on the answering  machine that
everyone  has been invited to the party.

 -----Original Message-----
From:    whotels@whotels.com [mailto:whotels@whotels.com]
Sent:   Wednesday, December 20, 2000 6:08 PM
To:   ELDON@interx.net
Subject:   Reservation Confirmation


Steve, thanks for the note.  It was great to meet you.  I look forward to
seeing more of you in the future.

Regards,
Jeff


Here is the new value tabs.  Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks
Ben


Very good stuff.  I will get back to you later.

Jon Chapman
11/15/2000 09:37 AM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Yes but...........

I'm afraid I'm still none the wiser . Anyway , points of history : (1) Yes ,
we did , technically , lose the American War of Independence but it was
because we got sick of it and had other "fish to fry" in Asia and Africa ,
plus it was really a civil war because the people who "beat" us were ,
largely , first or second generation "Americans" and , therefore ,  Brits
(for example , George Washington's family home is still there close to my
home town of Sunderland in North-East England ) and (2) we never lost to the
French , we agreed to give them the worst bit - Quebec - in return for some
tastier possessions elsewhere .

Yours respectfully

Jon

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           15/11/2000 16:25

To: Jon Chapman/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Nice VP and possibly Pres.

That fact that you asked "who?" begs the further question of what exactly you
were up to in Houston.  Have the Brits ever really won a battle any way?
(Their failure to beat a bunch of colonized farmers with pitch forks has
resulted directly in this Florida mess, and their failure to put away the
French (of all people) has resulted directly in me and the vast majority of
my fellow Canadians being subjected to official and legally mandated
bilingualism).

To the point, I believe San Felipe is the battle field adjacent to the
Westheimer battle field, where the Brits (or at least one of them) were
purportedly waging a more efficient war, until being caught red handed on the
battle fields of San Felipe, where, all the while, the Canadian forces (or at
least one of them) were so successfully conquering the enemy.

Peter.

Jon Chapman
11/15/2000 06:43 AM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Nice VP and possibly Pres.

Who or what the ****ing hell is San Felipe - I don't remember the Brits ever
winning a battle there .

Jon

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           14/11/2000 18:35

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jon Chapman/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Nice VP and possibly Pres.

When I look at Al Gore I continue to be amazed that one, let alone 50
million, Americans voted for him.  Both Clinton's and Gore's continued
shamelessness, and disregard for doing the right and decent thing, is only
slightly less amazing than the American people (or at least half of them)
continuing to find reasons to support them.  My only, yet substantive, vested
interest in the outcome is that we are inundated with US T.V. and I can't
bear the thought of looking at Gore (and God forbid Hillary) for the next
four years.  If they don't settle this Florida thing, I am going to have it
have my cable disconnected.

We vote in our federal election on November 27th.  We will not have any such
problems however - not because we are any better than anyone (in fact, I am
not entirely confident that most of my fellow Canadians will understand, or
have ever have understood, the ballot or voted for who they thought they were
voting for) - but rather because of the political system which Jon's
ancestors were so kind to bestow upon us, which I refer to as "parliamentary
dictatorship''.

(Sorry Tana if you are a Democrat, but that is the independent middle of the
road - yeah right - view of a Canadian observer.  Jon, I cannot, however,
apologize for the political ruin which your system of Government has brought
upon us, other to acknowledge that the problem my not be the system but
rather our screwed up regionalization of your unified parliamentary system
into 11 separate parliamentary systems - and I suppose that could be
construed as an apology of sorts, except, for the record, I will never
apologize to you for anything until you make a public, i.e. to Tana and me by
e-mail, confession of your sins on San Felipe.  For that matter, you are as
bad as Clinton and Gore.)

Peter.


Just a reminder:

As we discussed at the policy committee offsite, I am assembling the goals
and objectives for the Board.

Please send yours to me by close of business, Tuesday, Feb. 6.

Thanks.


opps.  I just opened this.

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/20/2001 09:08 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Master Agreements

Kay, no comments from DF today, so far...I am reading now and feeling pretty
good about it.  The services guys want to conf. with Marvin at 10.15 am.  Can
we meet after that?


Sounds to me like this guy is full of shit!.   As seems to be typical for
most of those retards that used to work for Wilshire.


Vince,

Thank you very much for the follow up report.  I am sure Richard will be very
enthusiastic about the opportunity to speak with you and your team.  I
appreciate your help, and please feel free to contact me if you or Shirley
need assistance with logistics.

Again, thank you and I look forward to working with you again this recruiting
season.

Regards,

Kristin

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kaminski, Vince
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 8:27 AM
To: Gandy, Kristin
Subject: Re: A friend of mine

Kristin,

Thanks a lot for the resume.
We shall arrange a phone interview with Richard. This is out standard
procedure.
A phone interview is  followed by the on-site interview, after we determine
what is the best team to interview
the candidate.

Vince

From: Kristin Gandy/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/01/2001 05:14 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: A friend of mine

Vince,

Last week I was contacted by one of my friends who is very interested in
becoming an Enron employee.  He has a PHD and several years research and lab
experience.

Richard is afraid that being a PHD is a dying breed and may need to go back
to school to obtain an MBA.  I was wondering if you would mind looking at the
attached resume to assess if you have any interest in Richard, or if you feel
I should encourage him to go back to school.  I am unclear as to the
qualifications for your group so I apologize if this request is way off base.

Thank you for your help,

Kristin Gandy
Associate Recruiter
Enron Corporation
1400 Smith Street EB 1163
Houston, Texas  77002

713-345-3214
kristin.gandy@enron.com

 << File: Richard Heo Resume.doc >>


Cheryl:

Just a bit of history:  I think that the partial listing of officers on the
(authorized traders) list is only meant to be illustrative of corporate
officers and directors.  The ENA unanimous consent for the relevant company
is the authority for document execution.  If, for example, a VP is authorized
to execute for a particular company (by virtue of a corporate resolution or
unanimous consent) and that particular VP's name does not appear in the
partial listing, exection is not invalidated.  The execution is valid.

Have you had a broker question ENA's authority?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	04/05/2001 03:57 PM

		 To: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keegan Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: More reasons we need to revise the ENA authorized traders list
generally and right away

Hey Stephanie, we need to revise this list because it does not make sense at
least with respect to ENA.  It does not list key people (e.g. Gary) and it is
inconsistent with the resolutions.  For example, the resolutions say that a
managing director and treasurer can be a designated person to open an account
but ENA does not have such an officer.  There are MD's and then there is a VP
and Treasurer.  There are I think other inconsistencies we need to clear up
to avoid having the accounts invalidated.  Having these points clear is
especially important where, like now, we won't have Gary or Mark Frevert sign
because they are out of town and we need to open the account right away.

I know you are swamped so I will work tonight on revising the List for ENA
tonight and give the revisions to do first thing in the morning.

Can you revise the List for ECT today (or just doublecheck it) so that we do
not have a hold up in executing the Goldman International account for ECT
first thing in the morning.  I promised Sheila Glover we would execute it
right away.

Did we open any ENA accounts in the past two weeks and if so, just to be
clear, can we send them a list that includes Gary's name and title if he
signed.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


MTBE plant is up and running.  Production for Tuesday, May 23, was in excess
of 12 MB.


Jim,

Here are the key gas contacts.

   Work   Home   Cell

Phillip Allen  X37041   713-463-8626  713-410-4679

Mike Grigsby  X37031   713-780-1022  713-408-6256

Keith Holst  X37069   713-667-5889  713-502-9402

Please call me with any significant developments.

Phillip


no Ben

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 12/21/2000 04:14:25 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: CA Development Agreements

Are we just going to go with the contact at Sweetgum, or are we also
going to add Ben?

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com [mailto:Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 3:37 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Cc: kay.mann@enron.com; Ben.Jacoby@enron.com
Subject: Re: CA Development Agreements

713-646-3037.

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 12/21/2000 10:01:50 AM

To:   "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Ben. Jacoby (E-mail)" <Ben.Jacoby@enron.com>
Subject:  CA Development Agreements

I need Ben Jacoby's fax number to complete the CA Developmnet Agreements


Ok.  Here it is.  Quick and dirty.  Make any changes you like.  You're right,
if anyone's going to beat St. Louis, it's going to be KC, but I took St.
Louis.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
08/24/99 02:21 PM ---------------------------
From: Mitch Taylor AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on 08/24/99 12:36 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor@ECT
cc:
Subject: re: Project Tornado

I'm almost certain you continue to receive these without my forwarding them
to you.  They show up to me as a bcc:, however I believe they also get to you
under "mtaylor@ect.enron.com".  I don't know why it would come to me as a
bcc.  It must have something to do with your ect address.

Mitch
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Taylor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/23/99 06:25 PM ---------------------------

"Eric Watson" <EWATSON@skadden.com> on 08/23/99 06:29:19 PM

To:   borden@bingham.com, jhmoore@ect.enron.com, llawyer@ect.enron.com,
mcorbal@ect.enron.com, mkrautz@ect.enron.com, mmalino@ect.enron.com,
mtaylor@ect.enron.com, sdougla@ect.enron.com, etell@exchange.ml.com,
jjoshi@fitchibca.com, ablakesless@fmg-statestreet.com,
cma@fmg-statestreet.com, efrati@moodys.com, Kenton@rlf.com,
rbaird@velaw.com, jlawler@wilmingtontrust.com
cc:   EWATSON@mail5.allegro.net, JOSBORN@mail5.allegro.net,
MBUTCH@mail5.allegro.net (bcc: Mitch Taylor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT)

Subject:  re: Project Tornado

Attached please find a copy of the Offering Memorandum for Project Tornado,
marked to show changes from the previously distributed version.  I have also
included a clean copy for your convenience.

This is an interim draft, but in the interest of keeping to the timetable we
wanted to distribute it tonight.

Please fax any comments to (212) 451-7679.

If you have any questions please call me at (212) 735-3152.

------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by
telephone and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and
any printout thereof.
 - 0285202.doc - 0306136.doc


Just an FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farmer, Stanley
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 9:42 AM
To:	Pierce, Jody; Allen, Melissa; Stubblefield, Wade; Sommers, Jeffrey E.; Lindholm, Tod A.; Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Faldyn, Rodney
Subject:	FW: Goodwill Allocation Memorandum

See message below.  I have also included Appendix A referenced in the memorandum that includes the summary of goodwill as of June 30, 2001.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farmer, Stanley
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 4:24 PM
To:	Causey, Richard; Colwell, Wes; Butts, Bob; Faldyn, Rodney
Cc:	Morrison, Mike
Subject:	Goodwill Allocation Memorandum

Everyone,

Attached below is the memorandum we are preparing to document Enron's position on assignment of goodwill to reporting units pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 142.  For the sake of expediency, the appendicies referenced in the memorandum have not been included for review at this time.

Please review and provide your comments back to Mike Morrison or me by next Monday afternoon if possible.

We look forward to your input.

Thanks,

Stan


no, do not forward a final draft of the report until you can confirm the current status of the pending documents.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farrell, Keegan
Sent:	Wednesday, June 20, 2001 9:46 AM
To:	Nelson, Cheryl
Subject:	RE: ISI/Bear Prime Broker Agreement and Credit First Suisse Boston

I am implementing the marked changes as we speak.  When I dropped off the documents, she and I had spoken about the status of the highlighted agreements.  She says she is currently working on something, and cannot check until later.  Should I give the copy of the BAS to Sara before or after Stephanie checks these out?  Please advise.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Cheryl
Sent:	Wednesday, June 20, 2001 9:40 AM
To:	Panus, Stephanie
Cc:	Farrell, Keegan
Subject:	FW: ISI/Bear Prime Broker Agreement and Credit First Suisse Boston

Hi again Stephanie,

please note that the CFSB agreement and the Jeffries agreements from last week are urgent.

Keegan,
make sure you check with Stephanie about the status of the pending brokerage matters for the list -- i.e., whether in fact we have received back executed copies for those on the pending list.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Cheryl
Sent:	Tuesday, June 19, 2001 3:18 PM
To:	Panus, Stephanie
Cc:	Farrell, Keegan; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	ISI/Bear Prime Broker Agreement and Credit First Suisse Boston

Stephanie,

Keegan is going to forward to you some documents sent by ISI.  The documents ae part of a prime broker agreement that ENA has to have in place with Bear so that ISI can clear the trades.  The attached agreement is a boiler plate vanilla agreement.  Please check the files and Lotus Notes to determine whether ENA has an executed agreement for the account number noted on the documents.  Also, please clarify the matter one way or the other with ISI and Bear by calling, among others, the names listed on the top of the agreemetn.  These are the folks at Bear that ISI is dealing with, and who say that they have no record of an agreement.  I would think we already have an agreement and if not, we do not want to sue the boilerplate -- we would at least use an edited version of the agreement I have on file which we have successfully negotiated with other parties.  If you have any questions please let me know.  Please also update lotus notes to reflect what you find.  (A while back, Bear goofed when John Galloti got confused and sent us a copy of an executing agreement or boilerplate -- please note that we want to send to ISI a copy of a prime broker agreement between ENA and Bear).

Also, Keegan or I will forward to you today or tomorrow the agreement that I have just negotiated with CFSB.  Please add a lotus notes entry for this clearing agreemetn.  Note that we sent commetns on 5/11 and had to resend them.  We had a conference call today in which we settled on the final version of the agreement.  Thanx.


Kate, could you ask Matt Motley if he did this trade Monday or Tuesday.
Powerex says Monday and we show Tuesday.

Thanks,

Kimberly


I would like to attend.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Elbertson, Janette   On Behalf Of Haedicke, Mark E.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 10:05 AM
To:	Alatorre, Jaime
Subject:	Mark Haedicke's Visit to Mexico City

          Janette,
          With reference to our telephone conversation of last Friday, I talked to Jaime Alatorre.
           He will not be  able to be with Mr. Haedicke tomorrow Tuesday Oct. 16 at 2:00 o'clock, as he already had made an appoitnment.
           He mentioned that maybe the best time would be after finishing the staff meeting. (He thinks Mr. Haedicke will
           also be in the same meeting).
          Do you think they could meet tomorrow at around 5:15 pm.?
          If this is not possible, he will talk to you later, as he is out of the office in a Seminar this morning.

          Thank you, Ma. Elena


Company name should be replaced by your business unit name.
EGS in the page # should be replaced by the abbreviated name of your business unit, i.e. EGAS, EEOS, ETS, etc.  This works 	better if you do this in the View, Master, Slide Master area.
The O&M/G&A graph should include your direct business unit expenses, Corporate costs and other significant allocated costs.
  	Please break out the Corporate and allocated costs for the ones that have increased significantly.
Please use the Arial font.
It may work better if you insert your slides into this template.

We are suggesting that for comparison purposes for financial data we only show 2001 Third CE and 2002 Plan.  If that does not tell the story you are trying to present, then do what you need to and we can discuss with Stan on Nov. 1.

I will not need anything in advance of the Nov. 1 meeting with Stan.  However, I will need all presentations for the Lay Reviews at
9:00 a.m. on Monday, November 5, or sooner, if possible.  I will need to make books and have them copied prior to the Lay Reviews on November 8.

On Nov. 1, please bring a copy for Stan, Rod, myself and a few extras.

If you need any help or have any questions, please give me a call at 713-853-7372.


this is another publication we are seeking to put on EnronOnline.  This party
had their own contract, so please take a look and lets discuss.  The deal is
pretty simple:  We pay 25,000 for a one year deal.  No user counts, or fees,
or attrition.  Just 25K for unlimited use.  They publish monthly but have
committed to going to twice a month.

thanks
Dave

---------------------- Forwarded by Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000 07:45
AM ---------------------------

John Sodergreen <JohnS@scudderpublishing.com> on 05/03/2000 07:58:50 PM
To: Dave.Samuels@enron.com
cc:
Subject: exchange site lic.

Hello Dave--Agreement attached (PDF file). Have a look and give a ring
tomorrow. Many thanks. Look forward to working with you.
Best,
John
 - enronexchangelic.PDF

John R Sodergreen
Editor-in-Chief
Scudder Publishing Group, LLC
johns@scudderpublishing.com
www.scudderpublishing.com
410.268.7778
The Desk, Power Executive
The Bandwidth Desk, Energy eBusiness


This is an automatic confirmation of the order you have placed using IT
Central.

Request Number:   ECTH-4S5SY2
Order For:               Amitava Dhar

1 x ( Compaq Armada M700     $3297 )
1 x ( OPTION: M300/M700 CONVENIENCE BASE     $293 )
1 x ( OPTION: CARRY CASE FOR M700     $72 )
1 x ( Option: M300/M700 Universal AC Adapter With Power Cord     $59 )
1 x ( Option: M300/M700 Universal Battery Charger     $124 )
1 x ( Option: M700 8 Cell LI-ION Battery     $149 ) Enron IT Purchasing


It's a smart way to finance tuition, remodel your home, take a vacation, or whatever you choose. The interest may even be tax deductible!

http://www.eloangroup.com

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://i.pm0.net/remove?funnymoney:10
* Enter your email address (Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "funnymoney:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>

pmguid:1c.1avz.803w8


I'm a bachelor next week and would love to go to dinner.  Anywhere you want.
John


Paul,  Attached is a redlined version of the agreement with the changes we discussed.  Please review and forward to Greeley for their review.


John still wants to hold off on a document review, as we don't know if we
want to go forward.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/11/2001 01:52
PM ---------------------------

John Llodra
05/11/2001 01:33 PM
To: Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David
Duran/HOU/ECT, Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Meyn/NA/Enron@Enron, Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron
cc:

Subject: NiMO

All:

Attached for your records is a copy of the final version of the proposal
letter that went out to NiMo last week.

Also attached below is a first set of clarification questions I receved from
Navigant regarding our proposal.   Responses to these questions are due no
later than Weds 5/16 and we will be working to respond to these in an
appropriate fashion.   You will see that the questions are rather shallow and
do not really provide any sense as to their reaction to our proposal.  I have
left msgs with the folks at Navigant so that I may speak with them in an
attempt to cut to the chase and discern what NiMO's true intentions are at
this point.  I do not want to waste time answering these questions and
marking up the proposed contracts if they ultimately will decide to take
another course of action.   My hope is to get a mtg with NiMO ASAP and
short-circuit the RFP process as soon as possible.

Please provide any comments on the attached questions by Monday so that we
can decide our form of response by Wednesday.  Kay - you will note they
requested markups of the Transacton Docs -- let's continue holding off until
I can get a better read if it will be worth the effort.  Ed/Paul - note the
questions on how much credit requirements we have assumed.  I don't know how
much more clearly we can state the fact that we require a claim on ALL of
NiMOs assets, but any appropriate elaboration on this would be appreciated.

John

---------------------- Forwarded by John Llodra/Corp/Enron on 05/11/2001
02:22 PM ---------------------------

PMcCormick@rcgroup.com on 05/10/2001 02:01:44 PM
To: john.llodra@enron.com
cc: lmq@rcgroup.com, DRyan@Navigantconsulting.com, rhevert@rcgroup.com,
jmeyn@enron.com

Subject: NMPC Questions

Hi John,

It was great to see you the other day -- here are the questions that Lisa
promised you.

Perrin

(See attached file: Enron - Cover Letter.doc)(See attached file: Enron.doc)
 - Enron - Cover Letter.doc
 - Enron.doc


The results are in...I've developed the pictures from the 'pub bash' in
London and this picture takes first prize - no bias intended.  How many pints
did he have?

On another note, I will be send the photos + negatives via FEDEX today to
Tracy Ralston's attention.

Kelly, I've developed a set of doubles, so let me know if you would like to
see them - there is a great picture of you and Jackie.

----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000 09:30 AM -----

	Simon Shih
	11/20/2000 08:59 AM

		 To: Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Who is that masked man?


Cindy,
Attached for your further handling are the Enron Corp. Guaranty and Secretarial Certificate needed in connection with an ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and Energy Partners, Ltd.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Stephanie


Drew:
     How is life?  Things here are going very well; just extremely hectic
(which, I guess, comes as no surprise).  I am giving you plenty of advance
notice; we are getting married on Sunday, September 2, the Sunday of Labor Day
weekend in New York. We have scheduled this in part to accomodate our dear
friends from out of town such that they do not have to take the Monday off
work.
Details to follow, but no excuses!  it has been far too long since I saw you,
and cannot imagine a happier occasion.  I will check in over the next few days
to hear how life is for you, and hope and trust it is all well.  Talk to you
soon, David & Joy

Drew.Fossum@enron.com on 10/19/2000 09:15:04 AM

To:   David N Schumeister/NY/NA/ShS@ShSDOMAIN
cc:

Subject:  Re: guess what!?!

Outstanding!  You have our most sincere congratulations and best
wishes--first for a great trip and more importantly for a great life
together!  I need to find a CLE boondoggle in the city that I can bring
Sandra to and we'll get together and celebrate.  I'd suggest you look for a
CLE boondoggle out here, but given your practice specialty, it might be
difficult to convince your partners they need to pay for a "hog law" or
"corn law" seminar!!!  Adios amigo.  DF

"David N Schumeister" <dschumeister@shearman.com> on 10/19/2000 02:37:51 AM

To:   Drew.Fossum@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  guess what!?!

Joy and I got engaged this past weekend; I am loving life and it is great.
We
leave for Italy tomorrow for ten days; I will call when we get back and
fill you
in on all the details.  Ciao, David


As evidenced by an exceptionally strong performance in the second quarter,
Enron,s wholesale energy businesses in North America and Europe continue to
experience tremendous growth.  The opportunities to continue to grow our
natural gas and power businesses have never been better and it is critical to
Enron,s future success that we remain focused on expanding these businesses
and maintaining the strong momentum we have in these markets.

It is equally important that we continue to develop new businesses outside of
gas and electricity, which can make significant contributions to our earnings
growth.  We have made significant progress in developing these businesses in
North America, Europe, and most recently in our new Net Works business unit.
Included in these global businesses are our efforts in crude and products,
coal, emissions, insurance, currency, equity trading, interest rates, credit
trading, paper and pulp, and metals.

While significant progress has been made in these efforts we need to
accelerate the growth of these new businesses while continuing to
aggressively expand our core gas and electricity businesses in North America
and Europe.  In order to accomplish these two objectives and to capitalize on
the increasingly global opportunities in these new businesses we are today
announcing the formation of a new business unit ) Enron Global Markets.  This
new business unit will focus on markets and commodities which are global in
scope, but outside our traditional gas and power markets.  This new core
business unit will operate in parallel with and in close coordination with
the North American and European businesses.

Enron Global Markets will be headed by Mike McConnell, President and Chief
Executive Officer, and Jeff Shankman, Chief Operating Officer.  They will
report to Mark Frevert who will be Chairman of Enron Global Markets.  Mark,
Mike and Jeff will comprise the Office of the Chairman for Enron Global
Markets.

Included in this new business unit and reporting to the Office of the
Chairman will be the following businesses and their leaders:
- Global Crude and Products:     John Nowlan
- Coal:         George McClellan
- Currency, equities, interest rate and agricultural trading:  Gary Hickerson
- Insurance and weather:      Jere Overdyke

Enron,s metals business and Enron Credit.com will remain the responsibility
of Enron Europe. The Paper and Pulp business will continue to reside in North
America.

With the departure of Mike McConnell from Enron Net Works, we are pleased to
announce the following appointments in that business unit:
- Jeff McMahon: President and Chief Operating Officer
- Louise Kitchen: Chief Commercial Officer
- Philippe Bibi:  Chief Technology Officer

Jeff, Louise and Philippe, along with Greg Whalley,  will comprise the Office
of the Chairman for Enron Net Works.

With Jeff Shankman,s departure from Enron North America,s natural gas
operation, all of Jeff,s direct reports will report to John Lavorato.

We are also pleased to announce the following changes to the Enron North
America Office of the Chairman.  John Lavorato will join the ENA Office of
the Chairman as Chief Operating Officer.  Dave Delainey will assume the role
of President and Chief Executive Officer.  Mark Frevert will retain his role
as Chairman of Enron North America in addition to his role as Chairman of
both Enron Global Markets and Enron Europe.

Please join us in congratulating everyone in their new assignments and in
supporting the new Enron Global Markets organisation.


Are you sure Lohitt is the right person to do this job.  What about EOTT?  No
one at EOTT even knew that Steve was leaving before I told them last week.
Communication skills are crucial in this job and I never thought that was one
of Lohitt's strong skills,


Hi.  To complete our discussion on the  manual monitoring & also to clarify,
see below.

Greg Whiting will call ENA whenever he enters more than a specified number of
changes in the SAP T880 table. He will transition this procedure to the SAP
COE.  What is the threshold that Global needs to be notified?  Who in Global
should be notified?

To clarify, the verification is manual & is subject to human error, such as
someone forgets or is on vacation.  If a large file is sent without
notification during the day, the impact is significant.  I think moving the
job to run in the evening will virtually eliminate the potential for this
problem to occur again.  However, to eliminate the risk completely I suggest
that the verification be automated.  You said that you'll have the ability to
do this in global in a few months.  If you can't do it, then we (SAP) need to
write an automated monitoring program.

Regan M Smith@ECT
07/05/2000 08:53 AM
To: Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth
Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Randy Rippentrop/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Beverly Fennessy/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan S Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark J
Leskowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa Shieh/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Louie
Truong/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Richard Elwood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth M
Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott
Williamson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jun Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Simon Sear/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Kevin T Dinh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terry
Sanvido/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pamela Lebrane/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Schomer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Lana Yu/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jaikishore Bharathi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Ogg/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: SAP / Global/ Unify replication problem on Friday June 30th

On Friday June 30th, Unify's production performance was impacted by a large
volume (30k) of replication/ configuration transactions from SAP.
The mass update from SAP to Global/ Unify effected Enron's business
throughout the afternoon, causing contract replication to be delayed, and
missed nominations.

Corrective actions taken to ensure this does not occur again:
Global Replication - Move the SAP to Global/ Unify replication for
Intercompany from hourly to a nightly (1:00 am) process.  As we could miss
new data setup dependencies, the volume is expected to be reduced.
SAP Support - SAP IT support will notify Global systems of any scheduled
'rebuilds'/ mass updates to monitor/ move the schedule during an off-peak
time.

Regan Smith, x39291
Manager, Unify Accounting
Unify/ SAP Interface


In today's edition of the Daily Update, frequent contributor Rick
Wayman, CFA, discusses the impact on the stock market of new FAS
rules and political infighting.

======================== Sponsored by =========================

123% Average Returns - Even as the Dow and Nasdaq Have Slumped
Take advantage of the most powerful moneymakers on Earth and
your portfolio could double faster than you dreamed possible -
even in this market! Get all the details in this FREE report

http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/OHL/2002
==============================================================

Also, equity research columnist Dave Sterman discusses the political
climate where RBOCs are concerned, and the ultimate impact on those
stocks.

Today's selection of broker and independent research reports include
wireless telecom, semiconductors, and specialty retailing. In addition,
members can download a free Morgan Stanley report on Intimate Brands
(IBI), by registering for the firm's free research trial.

You can link directly to our research page, which features synopses
of broker and free reports, by clicking here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=5798&nd=0110

***************************************************************
You are receiving this mail because you have registered for
Multex Investor. To unsubscribe, see bottom of this message.
***************************************************************

Below
--------

- Investment ideas
- Broker and third-party research
- Online advice and chats
- Free and sponsored reports

Investment ideas
-----------------------------------------

1. INVESTMENT IDEAS
FASten your seatbelts
New accounting rules and political infighting will make for a bumpy ride
ahead

by Rick Wayman, CFA

This is going to be an interesting quarter, if not year! The stock market is
advancing like it expects a recovery in the first half of 2002, and
politicians have reverted to their pre-9/11 partisanship. Coupled with the
new accounting rules for goodwill amortization (FAS 142), this could
make for a volatile stock market in the first quarter.

The market appears ahead of itself, and there is more downside risk than
upside potential. Stocks have rallied significantly from the 9/11 lows, but
we are really only back to where we were pre-9/11. The easy money has
been made, and now economic reality poses a threat. We think the
positive economic data that was released last month will be replaced with
negative trends in the first part of 2002. This is because the discounting
that boosted sales in December stole activity from the first part of 2002.
Consequently, we expect 4Q01 profit margins (to be reported in the first
quarter of 2002) to shrink, and early 2002 sales data to show a decline.

Click here to read more.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=5796&nd=0110

======================== Sponsored by =========================

Tech Buyback Portfolio Posts Stellar Gains: +39.23% YTD!
David Fried knows a stock is undervalued when the company
buys back its shares. That's how he earned 39.23% YTD in
techs while the benchmark Nasdaq fell 21.82%. 'Buy these 5
techs today,' Fried says. Get them with a FREE trial:

http://www.investools.com/c/go/BACK/MTEX-backTX3
==============================================================

2. INVESTMENT IDEAS
Regulatory roadblocks loom for RBOCs
Hating Ma Bell has never gone out of style

By Dave Sterman, equity research columnist

The slowing economy has been a boon for at least one segment of the
telecom world. The Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) saw
many smaller competitors go bankrupt in 2001, and their purchasing
costs fell as telecom equipment vendors were forced to lower prices to
win business. That left management of these firms sitting in the catbird
seat as we head into 2002.

But hold the phone. Washington appears set to deliver a series of
regulatory setbacks to RBOCS such as SBC Communications (SBC),
BellSouth (BLS), Qwest Communications (Q) and Verizon (VZ).

Click here to read more.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=5791&nd=0110

Broker and third-party reports
-----------------------------------------

1. INVESTORS' CHOICE: 3-DAY FAVORITE
The 451 discusses Cisco's (CSCO) new focus on the mobile wireless
market.

This report examines IP infrastructure spending, the next-gen
Internet and network architecture layers, Cisco's strategic
alliances and mobile business customer targets, and advanced e-
services and content applications. (2-page report for purchase -
$5)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=5676705&nd=0110

2. TODAY'S SPECIAL REPORT
Robert Baird & Co. reviews 2001 and previews 2002 for major
wireless service companies.

The firm identifies the winners and losers from 2001 and
recommends large- and small-cap players for investment in 2002. It
looks at some of the major industry developments from last year and
discusses 2002 industry catalysts. (7-page report for purchase - $25)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25912036&nd=0110

3. EDITOR'S PICK: CURRENT RESEARCH FROM THE CUTTING EDGE
Sun Trust Robinson Humphrey publishes a collaborative equity focus
report.

The report includes quantitative analysis and features on
electronic transaction processing, radio/TV broadcast, and individual
reports on HealthTronics (HTRN), SonicWALL (SNWL), Republic
Bancshares (REPB), and more. (40-page report for purchase - $75)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25893163&nd=0110

4. THIRD-PARTY REVIEW
Kintisheff Research reviews activity in the optical and wireless
infrastructure equipment markets.

In the report, Kintisheff offers broad sector discussion and breaks down
Q4 sales by global region, by equipment type, percentage of sales by
individual vendors in transport, switching, routing, and wireless
infrastructure. (11-page report for purchase - $25)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25918244&nd=0110

5. WHAT'S HOT?
RBC Capital Markets discusses beginning of 2002 softline retail
strategy.

RBC takes a look at recent performance amongst the group and the
forward-looking earnings outlook. The firm identifies 3 stocks it finds
attractive on a valuation basis, one of which is Abercrombie and Fitch
(ANF). (2-page report for purchase - $10)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25935069&nd=0110

======================== Sponsored by =========================

The Internet Analyst: Wall Street's daily and weekly industry outlook

Multex's The Internet Analyst features daily 'Net-industry specific
research highlights, investment ideas, analyst opinions, portfolio
strategies: http://www.multexinvestor.com/Analysts/HomeTIA.asp

To be sure you receive your TIA newsletter every week, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/login.asp
==============================================================

Online advice and chats
-----------------------------------------

1. ASK THE ANALYST
Market Edge's Tom Ventresca explains why bad news can sometimes be
good news for the market.

Ventresca explains that investor sentiment tends to be an inverse
indicator for stocks. He identifies some of his favorite market indicators
and discusses his firm's sentiment index. Pose him your questions until
Fri., Jan. 11. Ask the analyst.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AskTheAnalystForm.asp?&nd=0110

Register to receive a FREE weekly market commentary and FREE trial!
Get unbiased, computer generated BUY-HOLD-SELL opinions on 4,700
stocks and more. No credit card needed.  Click Here
http://www.marketedge.com/multex.asp?Location=3

2. ASK THE EXPERT
Insurance.com's Ronald E. Newton discusses life insurance coverage
issues brought up by divorce.

Newton explains the importance of reviewing insurance coverage in the
midst of divorce to protect loved ones should catastrophic events occur.
Do you have all the coverage you need? He can take your questions
through tonight Thurs., Jan. 10, 5 PM ET. Ask the expert.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AskTheExpertForm.asp?&nd=0110

Free and sponsored reports
-----------------------------------------

1. FREE RESEARCH REPORT
CIBC World Markets provides its outlook and current position on the
semiconductor industry.

CIBC focuses on recent sales trends and its expected industry
revenue growth through 2004. It offers a sector investment opinion and
identifies its favorite names. This 18-page report, which usually sells for
$50, is free to members for the next 72 hours.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25914538&nd=0110

2. DAILY FREE SPONSOR REPORT
Morgan Stanley reviews strategies and valuation for "neutral"-rated
Intimate Brands (IBI).

The firm declines to set a target price for IBI, and notes that increased
focus on brand development, and tighter cost and inventory control may
not be enough to offset weak comps in a difficult environment. Members
can read the firm's description of investment positives and key risks by
registering for the firm's free-research trial.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=4335290&sid=8&nd=0110

===================================================================
Please send your questions and comments to:
mailto:investor.help@multex.com

If you'd like to learn more about Multex Investor, please visit:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/welcome.asp

If you can't remember your password and/or your user name, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/lostinfo.asp

If you want to update your email address, please click on the url below:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp
===================================================================

To remove yourself from the mailing list for the Daily Update, please
REPLY to THIS email message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line. To remove yourself from all Multex Investor mailings, including
the Daily Update and The Internet Analyst, please respond with the
words NO EMAIL in the subject line.

You may also unsubscribe on the account update page at:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp

===================================================================
Please email advertising inquiries to us at:
mailto:advertise@multex.com.

Be sure to check out our other newsletters, The Internet Analyst
and The Telecomm Analyst by Multex.com. The newsletters will
inform, educate, and entertain you with usable investment data,
ideas, experts, and info about the Internet and telecommunications
sectors. To see this week's issue,
click here:
http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/ or
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/


Hi Matt,

Carlos gave me a file folder with the Salmon filing docs.  I need the corp
books with share certs, as we are selling the member interests and expect to
do so with share certificates.  I need it by Friday if at all possible.

Thanks,

Kay


Electricity Crisis Puts PG&E in A Cash Bind
Utility is borrowing $1million per hour
David Lazarus and Christian Berthelsen, Chronicle Staff Writers
Tuesday,?December 12, 2000
,2000 San Francisco Chronicle
As California struggled yesterday with an unusual winter power crisis,
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. warned that it soon could run out of money to
buy electricity for its 4.5 million customers.
"The credit situation is getting much tighter," said Greg Pruett, a spokesman
for the San Francisco utility. "There will come a time when we won't be able
to buy power for people. This is going to happen more sooner than later."
The danger for PG&E is that financial institutions will stop lending the
utility money to cover its expenses. Northern California's power undoubtedly
would continue to flow, but it is unclear who would pay for it or how.
Meanwhile, the state's energy shortage eased slightly as PG&E's Diablo Canyon
nuclear power plant, which had been closed for repairs, returned to operation
ahead of schedule.
The, which oversees the power grid, declared a Stage 2 emergency alert late
yesterday afternoon when reserves fell below 5 percent of total capacity.
Power subsequently was cut to some industrial customers on a voluntary basis.
State officials had warned last week that a Stage 3 alert might be called if
as much as a third of California's generating capacity remained down for
repairs. A Stage 3 emergency allows utilities to initiate "rolling blackouts"
to relieve pressure on the system.
Milder-than-expected weather and the return to service of Diablo Canyon
prevented the situation from getting out of control, officials said.
But for PG&E, there is no relief in sight for what the company characterizes
as a financial disaster in the making.
UTILITY $4.6 BILLION IN DEBT
As of the end of November, Pruett said, PG&E had racked up about $4.6 billion
in charges buying power on the wholesale market -- charges that the utility
was unable to pass along to customers because of a rate freeze.
"Every hour that goes by means we're in debt a million dollars more," Pruett
said.
Although this may be the case, PG&E's gloom-and-doom stance can be seen as an
attempt to prod California regulators into lifting the current rate freeze
and allowing the utility to hit customers with billions in unforeseen costs.
Last week, the state Public Utilities Commission ruled that PG&E had not met
requirements for lifting the freeze and must continue swallowing extra costs
incurred in the volatile wholesale power market.
PG&E'S STOCK PRICE FALLS
This is playing havoc with PG&E's finances. The company's stock fell 7
percent to $21.94 yesterday after several leading brokerages issued
pessimistic outlooks for PG&E's profitability.
The utility predicts that it could be as much as $6 billion in the hole by
the end of the month.
"This situation cannot go on indefinitely," Pruett said. "The price of retail
electricity needs to rise."
Consumer activists expressed sympathy with PG&E's plight but insisted that
the utility remains responsible for all expenses incurred as California
proceeds with deregulation of the state's power market.
"Consumers should not bail them out for the rate freeze," said Nettie Hoge,
executive director of The Utility Reform Network in San Francisco.
"But going forward," she added, "we need to get wholesale prices under
control. Otherwise this is a perilous concern for everyone."
Hoge said she hopes PG&E's implicit threat of potential bankruptcy will get
the attention of federal regulators.
She said federal regulators will have to impose limits on California's
wholesale power rates to prevent the sort of price increases that resulted in
higher bills for some over the summer.
Wholesale electricity prices are now 16 times higher on average than in the
spring. Prices surged over the summer as the supply of available juice was
unable to keep pace with demand. They have remained high ever since.
Wholesale prices jumped yesterday after the ISO lifted a $250-per-megawatt
rate limit late Friday to discourage power companies from selling electricity
elsewhere.
But the move appeared to have some immediate unintended consequences.
$600 PER MEGAWATT WHOLESALE
The wholesale price of a megawatt hour of electricity on Monday was anywhere
between $600 and $800, and an official at the ISO acknowledged the agency did
not foresee prices reaching that level.
"We didn't think it would go that high," said Patrick Dorinson, a spokesman
for the agency.
In addition, while lifting the cap did encourage more generators to put bids
on the market, most of them were in the south. Because the distribution
system cannot handle a large volume of electricity moving south to north,
where demand is highest, the bids were of limited benefit.
Asked whether the bids managed to drive up the cost of electricity without
meaningfully augmenting supply, Dorinson declined to comment.
DAVIS' PREDICTION COMES TRUE
Gov. Gray Davis protested the ISO's decision to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission on Friday night, saying an end to the rate limit would do more
harm than good.
"I suspect that, sadly, his prediction has come true," said Steve Maviglio, a
spokesman for the governor.
Last night, the California Power Exchange, which coordinates the state's
wholesale power market, asked the federal commissioners to overturn the ISO's
decision.
Ending the rate limit, exchange officials said, "threatens to bring dire,
irreparable and unintended consequences to the California markets."
About a quarter of California's generating capacity was offline as plants
throughout the state remained down for both scheduled and unscheduled
maintenance.
The Public Utilities Commission is expected to issue its findings this week
after a series of surprise inspections of idled plants last week.
Loretta Lynch, the president of the PUC, said the inspections were merely a
form of "information gathering," but she stressed that it was unacceptable
for so many plants to be down at the same time. She called for a system to be
developed to better schedule maintenance.
Federal regulators are expected to draw up a blueprint for overhauling
California's energy market this week.
E-mail David Lazarus at dlazarus@sfchronicle.com and Christian Berthelsen at
cberthelsen@sfchronicle.com.
,2000 San Francisco Chronicle ?


can you explain this to me? tx rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tribolet, Michael
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:05 AM
To:	DL-RAC Underwriting; Buy, Rick; Lipshutz, Cheryl; Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject:	Exchange ratio and bond price

As we discussed yesterday, the exchange ratio adjusted price comparison is the key ratio to guage market merger appetite.   I also included the ENE 6 5/8% 10/15/03 bond price to view the credit market's perception.
I'll send it around from time to time.  An excel file is attached.

Regards,

Michael

 << File: Enron-Dynegy.xls >>


Since I left, I don't know where this project stands. However, thought you
might want to see this.

Hope all is well.

Regards,

Stephanie
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron on 03/15/2000
10:54 AM ---------------------------

trobison@prosRM.com on 03/15/2000 10:38:31 AM
To: smiller@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Williams Licenses prosRM Capacity Management System from PROS
Revenue Management

Tina Robison
Corporate Communications
PROS Revenue Management
713-335-5397 - fax
713-335-5813 - phone
trobison@prosRM.com

 - WILLIAMS.PROS.PDF


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2000 02:31
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
04/10/2000 02:24 PM
To: achin@colcnr.com @ ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: East Tennessee (Receipts --Virginia--Dickenson County #2) and
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. - Zone 5 - Cook School Road Receiving Station

Here is the transport data for the Cook School Road

  March  April
CNG Index $2.79  $3.06

Demand $.1000  $.0400
Comm  $.0521  $.0521
Fuel  1.28%  1.28%

Receipt Price $2.6029  $2.9294

Let me know what you come up with.

Thanks

achin@colcnr.com on 04/10/2000 11:20:45 AM
To: Chris.Germany%enron.com@colcnr.com
cc:
Subject: Re: East Tennessee (Receipts --Virginia--Dickenson County #2) and
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. - Zone 5 - Cook School Road Receiving Station

304-353-5128


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
11:01 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Elizabeth Soto                           12/07/2000 10:37 AM

To: Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brandee Jackson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Heather
Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron,
Alejandra Chavez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kulvinder Fowler/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kyle R
Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alexander R Gonzales/NA/Enron@ENRON, Andrea R
Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia Rodriguez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Hannah
Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yolanda Pena/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chantelle
Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal
Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Purvi Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
b.castro@ssss.com, catrina@SVTN.com, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carole
Frank/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: FW: DOG GONE

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
10:08 AM ---------------------------

josie_carrillo@reliantenergy.com on 12/07/2000 10:03:16 AM
To: elizabeth.soto@enron.com, alexander.r.gonzales@enron.com,
imelda_condado@reliantenergy.com, Misty_M_Edwards@reliantenergy.com
cc:
Subject: FW: DOG GONE

---------------------- Forwarded by Josie Carrillo/HLP/HouInd on 12/07/2000
10:00 AM ---------------------------

"Garcia, Yvette" <yvette.garcia@wilcom.com> on 12/07/2000 09:29:15 AM

To:   'Josie Carrillo' <josie_carrillo@reliantenergy.com>, 'Ceci Gonzalez'
      <cecilia@amigotruck.com>
cc:

Subject:  FW: DOG GONE

> Subject:     FW: DOG GONE
>
>
>
>
>  <<Grannyl.mpg>>

(See attached file: Grannyl.mpg)

 - Grannyl.mpg


Hi Larry,

We haven't heard from you for a while and wanted to check back with you.
Have you made a purchase yet?  If so, we would appreciate a reply to this
message telling us you have already purchased so we will know not to send any
more follow up messages.

If you are still shopping, is there anything we can do to help you with your
buying decision?  Our goal is to help you make an informed decision that you
will be happy with for years to come.  Remember, since we don't own these
stones, we are your personal diamonds consultants who will work to find the
very best diamond for you at a great price.

If you have any questions about diamonds or the diamond buying process please
give Anne or me a call at the toll free number below or email us.  We take
calls until about 9:00 p.m. EST since we are dealing with customers and
suppliers on the West Coast.  We find that serious diamond buyers always want
to call and visit with us so that we can better understand your needs and
answer any of your questions.  Email works great for shopping, but the
telephone is the better way to conduct business for such an important
purchase.

Looking forward to hearing from you soon!

Denny Reinke - Vice President
Diamond Source of Virginia, Inc.
http://www.DSOURCEVA.com
Phone:   804-360-7428
Fax:   804-360-1532
Toll Free: 888-477-8385


Thanks,
Holden


Here's our current list of clients.. please let me know if you have any
comments..

Thanks for all your help,
Kind Regards,
Caroline


I will be leaving at noon on August 4.  Please add to the calendar.


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042806.txt


FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000
08:57 AM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 09/10/2000 11:25:53 AM
To: stemarie@icubed.com
cc: vkamins@enron.com, VKaminski@aol.com, shreve@matt.math.cmu.edu
Subject: (no subject)

Pierre-Philippe,

Thanks for your message. I shall be glad to make a presentation in early
November. I understand the presentation are on Fridays and November the 3rd
would be the best date for me.

If you prefer November the 10th, we have to wait a few more days with the
decision. We have a management conference every year in San Antonio and it
will be held either in the 2nd or the 3rd week of November. I shall know in a
few days. The same goes for November 9, assuming it was not a mistake (it's
Thursday).

I shall be free for dinner on the day of the conference. Thanks for the
invitation.

 Vince


Attached please find the first draft of the Gathering Services Agreement for
your review and comment.  This is the agreement with the Fixed Gathering
Fee.  There will be another agreement to cover gathering on EMS and Fort
Union.  Please provide your comments as soon as possible.


What happened to the Commission's deference to ongoing legislative efforts to
address direct access?

Thinking out loud: Wood's attempt to ram through an order ending DA may be a
good thing. If he succeeds, doesn't that just prove our point about the
Commission majority's unreasoning hostility to DA? A closure of DA now only
affects those currently offering service and I don't know of anyone doing
that. We need passage of a bill to revive DA one way or another, so that bill
would override the closure order anyway.

And if Wood fails to end DA, because Brown votes with Bilas and Duque,
doesn't that set Wood back on his heels?

Michael Rochman

-----Original Message-----
From: MDay [mailto:MDay@GMSSR.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 3:52 PM
To: 'Scott Govenar'; Mark Nobili; MDay; Bev Hansen; Aaron Thomas;
Michael Rochman; Julee Malinowski-Ball; Jeff Dasovich; Susan J Mara;
Jackson Gualco; Karen Mills; Dominic DiMare; Bill Booth; Sandra
McCubbin; Matt Moretti; Keith McCrea; Norm Plotkin; Barbara Barkovich;
Dorothy Rothrock; Delaney Hunter; Wes Larson; Vincent Stewart;
gharrison@calstate.edu; Lance Hastings; cra@calretailers.com; Will
Brown; Richard Seguin; Dennis Flatt; Roger Richter; Ken Pietrelli; Les
Spahnn; Chuck Cole; Mike Monagan; Tracy Fairchild; Dave Finigan
Subject: RE: CPUC

The ALJ has confirmed that Commissioner Wood has amended an order about PX
credit modifications to include an end to direct access and placed it on the
agenda.? We do not have access to the proposed order to verify the precise
language.? The order is NOT an order from Commissioner Bilas as the agenda
improperly suggests.? Parties seeking to retain direct access rights should
contact Pres. Lynch and Commission Brown in particular, as well as
Commissioner Duque and Commissioner Bilas.? There is some indication that
Commission Bilas may prepare an alternate omitting the ban on direct access.
Mike Day

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Govenar [mailto:sgovenar@govadv.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 3:42 PM
To: Mark Nobili; Mike Day; Bev Hansen; Aaron Thomas; Michael Rochman;
Julee Malinowski-Ball; Jeff Dasovich; Susan J Mara; Jackson Gualco;
Karen Mills; Dominic DiMare; Bill Booth; Sandra McCubbin; Matt Moretti;
Keith McCrea; Norm Plotkin; Barbara Barkovich; Dorothy Rothrock; Delaney
Hunter; Wes Larson; Vincent Stewart; gharrison@calstate.edu; Lance
Hastings; cra@calretailers.com; Will Brown; Richard Seguin; Dennis
Flatt; Roger Richter; Ken Pietrelli; Les Spahnn; Chuck Cole; Mike
Monagan; Tracy Fairchild; Dave Finigan
Subject: CPUC

The CPUC is going to consider eliminating direct access at its June 14th
meeting.? Please spread the word accordingly.


Hey, I just saw your email.  I'm still here.  I'm moving my stuff from 6 to 5 today and then I'm going to take the longest vacation of my life.  I may or may not come in tomorrow but I will be out until Jan 2nd.  I'm probably leaving early today too.  I may actually take the first week of Jan off too.

How are you?  I just called your nubmer and got your voicemail.  I'm glad you have something.  Don't be upset if I don't return your email for awhile.  I'll be on vacation.

Later Gator

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Franklin, Cynthia" <Cynthia.Franklin@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:01 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	Chrissy ... Are you
Importance:	High

.....still there?

Cindy
832.676.3177

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Thanks
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


The PRELIMINARY DPR reflects a Maturity Gap Risk violation for Gas Trading in
the following amount:

 LIMIT:  300 Bcf
 Maturity Gap: (317) Bcf


Steve:  here's the final witness list.  You are still with the FERC witnesses
but this is now the second panel.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 09/08/2000
04:01 PM ---------------------------

"Black, Andy" <andy.black@mail.house.gov> on 09/08/2000 03:45:02 PM
To: Chris Giblin <chris_m_giblin@reliantenergy.com>,
Howard_Useem@energy.senate.gov, Cal Odom <codom@eei.org>, Montee Wynn
<montee.wynn@nreca.org>, Cynthia Sandherr <Cynthia_Sandherr@enron.com>,
gwilliams@sempra.com
cc:

Subject: San Diego witness list

 <<san diego witness list.wpd>>

Each of you have asked for this.  Enjoy.

 - san diego witness list.wpd