As a valued member of the WallStreetCity community, you've  asked to be notified about new investment tools, features,  and money-saving opportunities from WallStreetCity and our  strategic partners.  We think you'll be interested in this  exciting offer from Earnings Whispers.
To unsubscribe, see the link at the end of this email. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
A New Technology Perspective on Investing
A New  Perspective on Technology Investing

[IMAGE]Do you  understand technology well enough to make gains in the current market?  Did you  know when Qualcomm was about to gain  2,500% or when it was about to lose two-thirds of its value?  Do you know when  to get into a technology stock before the market rallies behind it or when to  get out of it before the big sell off?  http://www.techperspectives.com/promo.asp?advert=wsc1024
Our new  newsletter provides two to four research reports per month detailing a fast  growing technology and the top candidate for turning the technology into  profits.  The reports provide details of the companies' earnings potential and  how to reasonably value the stock.  Plus get insight from leading research  analysts and management comments, so you have multiple perspectives on the outlook of the company and its technology.
You'll learn which companies are about to substantially grow their earnings and  which stocks have outgrown their near-term potential.  Therefore, you are  more equipped to make gains and to hold onto profits.
 Here's What You Get When You Subscribe!
 Our two most recent  research reports for FREE. Two to four new  research reports each month. Access to our  portfolio so you may monitor the performance of every stock we've  covered. Daily summaries of  the top technology news affecting the market. A FREE trial to  Investor's Business Daily.

 http://www.techperspectives.com/promo.asp?advert=wsc1024

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This offer has been sent to you courtesy of WallStreetCity.com.  To be removed from the e-mail distribution list simply click  the link below and hit "Send" on the e-mail that is launched. (Or copy and paste the email address below to a new outgoing  email message and hit "Send" on the email that is launched).  NOTE: By removing your email address from our list you will  no longer receive the FREE WallStreetCity Stock Search,  Industry Analysis, The Week Ahead or the FREE  WallStreetCity.com Update. Unsubscribe Here
If you have tried unsubscribing in the past -- and believe  that you received this message in error -- please send an  email to  yourfeedback@wallstreetcity.com  to voice your concerns and be removed from the list.


Uhhhh   Pappasitos today and we shoudl chat after I eat my food.  That means
that YOU DE MAN!!!!!

	From:  Jim Homco                           03/14/2001 11:21 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Hey - cab you send me prices and volumes
that you have in SITARA for Ogy for March.
If you don't respond...I'll tell your boss !!!

FYI - Jason Crawford resigned today.


Start Date: 10/23/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102302.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


Hi Scott,

Do you want to get together a few minutes early tomorrow to discuss
indemnity/LOL, etc?

Kay


Dear Don Baughman Jr.,

Thank you for ordering Dope Wars 2.0 for Windows through RegNet - The
Registration Network.  Your order has been processed and your order number is
listed below.  Please reference this in any further correspondence.

Order Number: #330038

Your registration provides: Registration code and instructions by e-mail.

Quantity: 1
Registration Cost: $6.95
Shipping & Handling: $0.00
The Total Charged: $6.95

Your online receipt is available at:
http://www.reg.net/receipt.asp?OrderNum=330038&EMail=don.baughman@enron.com

If for some reason, you have not received your registration information
within 12 hours, please reply to this e-mail so we can assist you.

Be sure to visit our web site for more great software: http://www.reg.net

Thank You,

RegNet Customer Service
http://www.reg.net/
RegNet - The Registration Network


High Level Penalty Summary

Date(s) of Flow

 November 18 - 21, 2000

Contract Involved:

 38088  ENA delivered 33,250 to Hopewell on this contract for dates below.
VNG needed volume below to balance at gate, attempted to pull    and contract
was overrun.

  18 VNG took 29,782 from storage, result of both ENA and VNG was 14,002
overrun.

  19 VNG took 44,476 from storage, result of both ENA and VNG was 28,696
overrun.

  20 VNG took 37,643 from storage, result of both ENA and VNG was 21,863
overrun.

  21 VNG took 56,881 from storage, result of both ENA and VNG was 18,876
overrun
   ______

 Total Overrun: 83,437 @ $0.1992 =  $16,620.65

 60536  ENA delivered 11,451 back into the VNG storage as payback when VNG
pulled all 14,625 and overran the contract.

  21 14,306 overrun
   ______

 Total Overrun: 14,306 @ $0.1992 = $2,849.76

 TFE  Total Firm Entitlement Penalty

  18-21 97,743 @ $5.6684 = $554,050.00

   Total Overrun on both contracts and penalty due to market area
restrictions when overrun occurred.

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
****************
1) Enron NA was never notified by TCO of any penalty, overrun on VNG contract
or pipeline OFO situation during the November 18-21 time period.

2) Denise Dotson was notified by VNG gas control on the morning of November
20th about the overrun situation above.  The VNG gas control experienced  the
problem but did not notify Enron or AGL until Monday morning.

3) Enron immediately placed ranking system in Navigator to make VNG first
priority.  This was completed Monday afternoon November 20th.

4) On Tuesday morning 11/21, Denise Dotson once again called Enron stating
that the previous night VNG attempted to pull maximum  volumes from   storage
contracts only to overrun contract due to ENA nominations to other delivery
points.  Joann Collins called her Columbia team and was told that the
ranking was not applicable after the last confirmation cycle on any gas day
with no-notice contracts.  Ranking has zero effect with the late night
schedulers.

5) Enron dropped the Hopewell nomination from the VNG contract(s) effective
11/22.

---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000
01:05 PM ---------------------------

"Denise Dotson" <ddotson@aglresources.com> on 12/08/2000 04:18:42 PM
To: <robert.superty@enron.com>, <steve.gillespie@enron.com>
cc: <ahamilto@aglresources.com>, <mark.breese@enron.com>

Subject: Columbia Gas Transmission (TCO) penalties - November 2000

** High Priority **

I received a call this afternoon from the VNG - TCO Account Manager.  VNG
incurred pipeline overrun charges from  Nov 17th - 21st.  TCO stated ENA used
VNG capacity to deliver to other markets {Hopewell Power Plant}.  TCO
notified Enron and VNG of the allocation problem during the month of
November, 2000.  Although TCO assured Enron that the predetermined allocation
methodology would be corrected to allow VNG rights to pull under the contract
first, however, based on the conversation with TCO, corrections were not
made.  Therefore, VNG incurred overrun charges under the VNG contract @
$10.00/dth totaling $560,000+.

Please notify pipeline to reconcile and provide AGLES with pipeline invoices
for November, 2000.  ENA is responsible for all penalties associated with
this transaction.


Dan,

As a follow up to my voice mail, we have the following comments to the
above-referenced Agreements:

Provider Agreement - notices - Please add the following:  Notice of any
default shall also be sent to Enron Corp., 1400 Smith Street, Houston, Texas
77002, Attn: Executive Vice president and General Counsel.

General Terms and Conditions
1.  Section 1 - Third sentence - Please add "and written notice to Provider
as set forth in the Provider Agreement" after the word "System".

2. Section 3 - Third Sentence - Please add " during the term of this
Agreement" after the word "time".

3. Section 5 - Sixth Sentence - Please substitute "the accepting party" in
lieu of the word "User".

4. Section 5 - Seventh Sentence - Please substitute "EnergyGateway shall
cause the System to" in lieu of the phrase "The System shall".

5. Section 8 - Please delete the word "grossly" and the last phrase ", User
or a third party".

6. Section 9 - Please revise the third sentence to read "Transaction fees
will be based on the total volume set forth in an accepted transaction and
will be invoiced by EnergyGateway in full following the transaction
confirmation."

7. Section 16 - Please add the word "written" before the word "consent".

8. Section 23 - Please make this provision mutual and delete the last half of
the section beginning with "RESULTING FROM .........".

9. Section 24 - Please change Ohio to New York and delete the second
sentence.  We prefer arbitration.  Please let me know if you would agree to
look at our standard arbitration provision.  In the fourth sentence, please
change "EnergyGateway's" to "Either party's".

10.  please provide me with a copy of the privacy policy.  I was unable to
locate it on your website.

Should you have any comments or questions, please call me at 713-853-9720.
Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.

Jason Peters


Hi guys,

I'm faxing you some changed pages as requested for the CA Development deal.
For some reason my email wouldn't go through.

I should have an answer to the invoice question tomorrow.  If all else fails
you can send the invoices to Ben and we can process them here.

Kay


I'm old now, but i can always find solace in the fact that you are older!  I
don't know yet if I am going to go out tonight, but if I do we'll probably go
to Woody's on Richmond - it used to be the velvet Elvis
-e

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@compaq.com> on 01/20/2000 08:43:40 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: HAPPY BIRTHDAY

HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!!!!

How does it feel to be 23 fuck face?  I hope your day goes well!!!  What do
you want to do tonight?
JASON BASS
Technical Support Engineer

Compa Q


Here is the updated version


Congratulations.
---------------------- Forwarded by David Oxley/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2000 07:38
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Rick Causey @ ENRON                           01/17/2000 06:04 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Global Risk Management Operations

Recognizing Enron,s increasing worldwide presence in the wholesale energy
business and the need to insure outstanding internal controls for all of our
risk management activities, regardless of location, a global risk management
operations function has been created under the direction of Sally W. Beck,
Vice President.  In this role, Sally will report to Rick Causey, Executive
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer.

Sally,s responsibilities with regard to Global Risk Management Operations
will mirror those of other recently created Enron global functions.  In this
role, Sally will work closely with all Enron geographic regions and wholesale
companies to insure that each entity receives individualized regional support
while also focusing on the following global responsibilities:

1. Enhance communication among risk management operations professionals.
2. Assure the proliferation of best operational practices around the globe.
3. Facilitate the allocation of human resources.
4. Provide training for risk management operations personnel.
5. Coordinate user requirements for shared operational systems.
6. Oversee the creation of a global internal control audit plan for risk
management activities.
7. Establish procedures for opening new risk management operations offices
and create key benchmarks for measuring on-going risk controls.

Each regional operations team will continue its direct reporting relationship
within its business unit, and will collaborate with Sally in the delivery of
these critical items. The Houston-based risk management operations team under
Sue Frusco,s leadership, which currently supports risk management activities
for South America and Australia, will also report directly to Sally.

Sally retains her role as Vice President of  Energy Operations for Enron
North America, reporting to the ENA Office of the Chairman.  She has been in
her current role over Energy Operations since 1997, where she manages risk
consolidation and reporting, risk management administration, physical product
delivery, confirmations and cash management for ENA,s physical commodity
trading, energy derivatives trading and financial products trading.

Sally has been with Enron since 1992, when she joined the company as a
manager in Global Credit.  Prior to joining Enron,  Sally had four years
experience as a commercial banker and spent seven years as a registered
securities principal with a regional investment banking firm.  She also owned
and managed a retail business for several years.

Please join me in supporting Sally in this additional coordination role for
global risk management operations.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2000
04:22 PM ---------------------------

Joseph Hrgovcic
04/05/2000 04:06 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: vkaminski@aol.com, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CME and CATEX

---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2000
04:06 PM ---------------------------

Lucy Ortiz
04/05/2000 04:02 PM
To: Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CME and CATEX

Spotlight Report
  Exchange products seeing slow trading
  GAVIN SOUTER

  03/20/2000
  Business Insurance
  Page 3
  Copyright (C) 2000 Crain Communications, Inc. All rights
  reserved.

  Exchange-based insurance products developed in recent years have
  been somewhat slow to get off the ground.

  Although several exchanges have offered derivative contracts since
  the mid-1990s to cover insurance risks, none so far has posted a
  significant volume of trades.

  Few insurers, reinsurers or policyholders have been drawn away
  from the traditional insurance markets, where capacity remains
  abundant and relatively cheap.

  As long as those traditional markets manage to weather major
  natural catastrophes, the allure of the exchange-based products will
  remain limited, observers say.

  Also stifling the growth of the exchange-based contracts is the
  limited number of contracts available, one expert noted. Dealers, he
  said, are unable to secure a suitable hedge by laying off one
  contract against another.

  Although the various exchanges have had a good opportunity to
  establish a widely used set of new risk financing products, that has
  not been achieved, said Morton Lane, senior managing director,
  capital markets division at Gerling Global Financial Products in
  New York.

  The main problem with the existing exchanges is that they do not
  offer a sufficiently diverse array of products, he said. The only way
  to control the risks in the catastrophe options is to have a diversified
  portfolio of other contracts, and none of the exchanges currently
  offers a sufficiently broad range of options to provide for that
  hedge, he said.

  Florida windstorm options, for example, cannot be bought and then
  hedged in the same way that International Business Machines Corp.
  stock options contracts can be hedged with IBM stock, Mr. Lane
  explained.

  The exchanges might be more attractive to investors if, in addition to
  natural catastrophe options, they included options on other risks, he
  said. Those might include, for example, satellite, aviation and crop
  indexes, Mr. Lane said. "For the insurance buyer, such exchange
  instruments would not represent the perfect risk transfer vehicle, but
  as long as they are quantifiable and indexable, they may represent a
  good surrogate," he said.

  The exchanges could also be used to create a derivatives market for
  over-the-counter securitized deals, if there are regular issuers of
  catastrophe bonds, Mr. Lane said.

  The soft insurance market has also hindered the growth of
  exchange-based insurance products, said Sean F. Mooney, senior
  vp and chief economist at Guy Carpenter & Co., the reinsurance
  brokerage unit of Marsh Inc. in New York.

  "The traditional market has been so competitive that people are not
  looking for other ways of doing business," he said.

  At least in concept, the exchange-based deals are generally similar
  to the mortgage-backed securities that have been a huge success
  since they were introduced in the 1970s. "There is a belief that
  alternative means of transferring risks will grow, but it is difficult to
  predict when," Mr. Mooney said.

  Currently, the trading that is taking place typically involves
  established insurers and reinsurers, so the exchanges have not
  brought substantial new capacity to the marketplace, he said.

  Guy Carpenter provided the index for the Bermuda Commodities
  Exchange reinsurance products. The BCE did not take off,
  however, and was suspended last year after two years of little
  activity.

  The oldest of the insurance-related, exchange-based derivative
  products are the catastrophe options traded on the Chicago Board
  of Trade, which began trading the options in 1996.

  Initially, there was substantial interest in the options, but the soft
  traditional market has hampered use of the contracts to hedge
  catastrophe exposures, said Carlton Purty, an independent broker
  at the CBOT who trades in options.

  No catastrophe option trades have been completed at the CBOT
  so far this year, he said. Last year, there was increased interest in
  the contracts because of Hurricane Floyd, but few contracts were
  traded, Mr. Purty said.

  "I think a major, major catastrophe will have to happen before they
  really take off," he said.

  The contracts offer real protection, and options dealers are keen to
  trade in a new niche, but the conventional insurance and reinsurance
  markets are so soft that few companies are turning to alternative
  coverage options, Mr. Purty said.

  The Catastrophe Risk Exchange, located in Princeton, N.J., has
  radically changed its structure since it was originally announced in
  mid-1996, and it is well positioned to expand, said Frank Sweeney,
  chief operating officer.

  CATEX initially planned to be a computer-based facility for
  reinsurers that would enable them to exchange catastrophe risks
  and to build balanced portfolios.

  But by the time the exchange was operational in November 1996, it
  was clear that most reinsurers and insurers interested in CATEX
  wanted only to buy and sell conventional reinsurance, Mr. Sweeney
  said.

  Although there was some interest in risk swapping, only a handful of
  risks were posted on the system, and none was traded, Mr.
  Sweeney said.

  Consequently, CATEX has become chiefly a "cash for cover"
  exchange, he said, noting that the risks reinsured on the exchange
  include property catastrophe coverage, aviation and liability
  coverages. CATEX also trades industry loss warranties, where
  coverage is triggered by an actual loss combined with an industry
  loss over an agreed threshold.

  Other adjustments to the exchange included making it accessible
  through the Internet in November 1998. And late last year, CATEX
  offered users the ability to set up smaller networks, allowing them
  form groups whose members do business only with one another.

  Since its inception, CATEX has completed about 450 trades,
  totaling $400 million in premium and more than $3 billion in limits,
  he said. CATEX's roughly 160 subscribers include reinsurers,
  insurers and corporate entities that purchase coverage through their
  captives, Mr. Sweeney said.

  "We obviously have a long way to go, but we are pretty satisfied
  with what we have achieved so far," Mr. Sweeney said.

  The exchange sees increased activity after major losses, as cedents
  seek to buy replacement coverage to offset depletions in their
  existing cover, he said. For example, Mr. Sweeney said, there was
  a flurry of activity after the European windstorms in December last
  year.

  Last September, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange entered the field
  of insurance-related derivatives when it began offering weather
  derivatives .

  Thus far, 420 futures contracts have been traded, said Larry
  Grannan, senior director in product marketing at the CME.

  Such contracts are designed to allow businesses to hedge against
  weather-related losses. For example, a utility may sell less power in
  a mild winter, and it would be able to use the futures to hedge a
  resultant fall in revenues.

  The exchange first offered heat-based indexes for Atlanta, Chicago,
  Cincinnati and New York. In January, it added Philadelphia, Dallas,
  Des Moines, Las Vegas, Tucson and Portland, and it began offering
  contracts based on cold weather.

  Currently, most of the trades are between securities dealers
  themselves, but, eventually, the contracts will likely be used more
  extensively by utilities and insurers, Mr. Grannan said.

  In addition, the futures contracts could be used as hedges for
  over-the-counter securitized deals, he said.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


FYI.  Just got a call from someone inside McKenzie & Co..  Seems the good
Governor has figured out that the gas industry is a problem and want to talk
to me about it.  I'm scheduled to talk to them by phone Friday at 1:30.  I
called Kari Dohn to try to find out more.  She told me that they've figured
out that the gas industry is a mess, that "McKenzie gets it," and she asked
to tell it like it is.  Seems useful to get our view across to them.  The
name of the person from McKenzie that will be on the call with the Davis
folks on Friday is Daniel Poller.  Thoughts?

Best,
Jeff


Dave

I had a great time last evening.  Do you have a personal email address ?

Harry


FYI


Kay,
          I agree with your comments on the selection of the ALJ.   The
following is our response to your two questions :              Ryan and I
believe that we can set forth a number of differences between the two cases
such as the site -specific air quality impact analysis required under the
applicable regulations;  the differences in parties to the proceedings; the
different impacts to the various petitioning local governments depending
upon their distance from the facility in question; the different phases of
discovery that the cases are presently in, and the like.  Nevertheless, the
foregoing may not be sufficient grounds to preclude the consolidation based
upon a minimal delay in the proceedings, as we understand that DEP is
proposing.
         More importantly, we previously expressed our concern with the
company's current position in the Deerfield proceeding relative to the
proposed Nox limitation of 36 ppm. Because DEP has not been persuaded to
date to increase the permit limitation to 42 ppm and because Enron did not
legally oppose such a condition in the Deerfield permit, then Enron's
ability to raise such an objection at this point appears to be impaired.
(There may be an argument that Enron noted its objection within the permit
comment period, which terminated after the deadline for filing any legal
objection, and therefore Enron noted its objection on the record and no one
is prejudiced by asserting its objection within the pending proceeding at
this stage, since discovery has only just been initiated).   In light of
these circumstances,  we could advise DEP that Enron's position is that it
does not object to the consolidation as long as the trial date is in January
2002 and as long as the parties  recognize that Enron will challenge the
proposed Nox limitation of 36 ppm under backup fuel use conditions with
respect to both permits in a consolidated proceeding.
        Please advise me of your thoughts.
           --Kerri
-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay [mailto:Kay.Mann@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:48 AM
To: BarshK@gtlaw.com; Krimsky, Steven; Jacoby, Ben; ReetzR@gtlaw.com
Cc: ReetzR@gtlaw.com
Subject: RE: DEP Air Permits-Conversation w/ Martha Nebelsiek re
Consolidation & Related Matters

Thanks for the clear report.

On the issue of the judge, I suggest we opt for whoever you think will
be most favorable, assuming we can get a hearing in January.

On the consolidation, what would we use as a basis for the objection? If
we don't have a decent basis I don't think we should object.

On a related issue, assuming we are going forward with the fuel oil
option on Deerfield, how are we going to put the 36 vs 42 issue in play?
Thanks,

Kay

	-----Original Message-----
	From: BarshK@gtlaw.com
	Sent: Wed 11/7/2001 7:28 PM
	To: Mann, Kay; Krimsky, Steven; Jacoby, Ben; ReetzR@gtlaw.com
	Cc: ReetzR@gtlaw.com
	Subject: DEP Air Permits-Conversation w/ Martha Nebelsiek re
Consolidation & Related Matters

	       Kay, Steve, Ben and Ryan,
	       I spoke with Martha today on the subject referred to
above and she
	advised me of the following :
	      1.   DEP is not contemplating a single, consolidated
permit but an air
	permit  for each of the Pompano Beach and Deerfield Beach
facilities.
	       2.   The petitioning local governments have no objection
to the
	consolidation proposed by DEP (no surprises there).
	        3.   Martha wants our input as to which ALJ we would
prefer to hear
	the case should DEP's request for consolidation be granted.   (
The upside
	to suggesting Judge Alexander is that we know that he have
already reserved
	his time for a 4-day hearing in January.  Otherwise, we might
choose Judge
	Stampelos based upon the prior comments that we have received
from our
	Tallahassee attorneys, although both Judges were considered to
be good.).
	          4. Martha indicated previously that she is looking for
a hearing
	in January, depending upon which ALJ hears the case and his
particular
	schedule.
	          5.  Martha advised me that she will file her request
for
	consolidation late tomorrow afternoon.  I told her, as we
discussed in our
	conference call, that if she does not hear from me to the
contrary, then we
	oppose the consolidation at this time.
	          6.  Martha agreed to provide us with the permit
language that DEP
	is proposing in connection with its Notice of Change of Agency
Position  on
	the Pompano Beach proceeding as soon as Al Linero completes the
drafting and
	she reviews the proposed permit conditions with him.  Martha
expects to
	provide us with the proposed permit language next  Monday or
Tuesday.
	          7.  The petitioning local governments have served DEP
with
	discovery.  I have yet to receive a copy of the discovery but
Martha intends
	to meet with Al Linero this Friday to discuss  DEP's response.
	          Based upon the foregoing, please advise me if you want
me to
	convey any further message to Martha prior to her filing of the
motion for
	consolidation tomorrow afternoon.  Specifically, I am interested
in your
	thoughts on our preference on the Judge that will hear the
proceeding, if
	consolidated, and whether we have any objection to DEP's filing
the motion
	for consolidation in which she will note our objection.  As we
discussed in
	our conference call, we can assert our position more fully in a
subsequent
	response to the motion for consolidation and can withdraw our
objection if
	we change our mind.
	         Thanks !  Kerri

	_______________________________________________________________
	The information contained in this transmission may contain
	privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only
	for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the
	intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review,
	dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
	communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
	intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
	and destroy all copies of the original message.

	To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an
	email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

_______________________________________________________________
The information contained in this transmission may contain
privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only
for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the
intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review,
dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an
email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 02:07 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	02/27/2001 01:52 PM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald <Michael.McDonald@enron.com>,
David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick Johnson
<rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra McCubbin
<Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton
<Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>, Beverly Aden <beverly.aden@enron.com>, Bill Votaw
<bill.votaw@enron.com>, Carol Moffett <carol.moffett@enron.com>, Debora
Whitehead <debora.whitehead@enron.com>, Dennis Benevides
<dennis.benevides@enron.com>, Don Black <don.black@enron.com>, Dorothy
Youngblood <dorothy.youngblood@enron.com>, "dblack@enron.com"
<dblack@enron.com>, "emelvin@enron.com" <emelvin@enron.com>,
"ehughes2@enron.com" <ehughes2@enron.com>, "gweiss@enron.com"
<gweiss@enron.com>, "gsavage@enron.com" <gsavage@enron.com>,
"Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "kgustafs@enron.com"
<kgustafs@enron.com>, Mike D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>, "sgahn@enron.com"
<sgahn@enron.com>, "vsharp@enron.com" <vsharp@enron.com>, "wcurry@enron.com"
<wcurry@enron.com>, "William.S.Bradford@enron.com"
<William.S.Bradford@enron.com>, Leslie Lawner <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, John
Neslage <john.neslage@enron.com>, Ken Smith <ken@kdscommunications.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ken Smith Documents

Attached, please find two proposed documents from Ken Smith for review
and comment:

 - 39 billion dollar fix.rtf
 - Constructive plan.rtf


This just came to me today.  This information is widely available to corporations and law enforcement around the country.  It will likely hit the media in the next day or so.  This is all the information that is available.

Enron Corp. Business Controls/Corporate Security received the following information via the National Threat Warning system.  While we do not wish to unduly alarm employees, the specificity of the information dictated immediate dissemination to our West Coast offices.

THE FBI IS IN POSSESSION OF UNCORROBORATED INFORMATION INDICATING THE
POSSIBILITY OF ADDITIONAL TERRORIST ATTACKS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES,
SPECIFICALLY THE WEST COAST.  REPORTEDLY, UNSPECIFIED GROUPS ARE
TARGETING SUSPENSION BRIDGES ON THE WEST COAST.  SIX INCIDENTS ARE TO
TAKE PLACE DURING RUSH HOUR BEGINNING FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 2 AND CONTINUING
THROUGH NOVEMBER 7, 2001.

NO FURTHER INFORMATION ABOUT THIS ALLEGED ATTACK IS KNOWN AT THIS TIME.
THE FBI IS ATTEMPTING TO VERIFY THE VALIDITY OF THIS REPORT.  RECIPIENTS
WILL BE UPDATED AS EVENTS WARRANT.

RECIPIENTS WHO RECEIVE OR DEVELOP INFORMATION RELATED TO THIS MATTER
SHOULD IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THEIR LOCAL FBI OFFICE.

We will keep you apprised if we receive any further information.

Thank you.


A Gas Risk Management Staff meeting is scheduled this morning Thursday, January 17th, at 10:00 AM in conference room ECS 5075.

Thank you,

AC


Dave,
	Two Items:

1)	Ram update
2)	Common Drive Update

Thanks
 Chris


Just to give a head's up,

In case I'm not here and you have to get something signed for EnronOnline,
Louise Kitchen absolutely does not want any other officer signing documents
for her group.  The only two signatories for EnronOnline are Louise and Andy
Zipper, Vice President.  FYI, we do have a resolution in place that allows
certain individuals to sign password applications (only!) on behalf of
EnronOnline.


Jana,

Thanks again for the invitation to join you at the Rodeo. It was a great
pleasure
to meet you and your husband.

What   about getting together next week for a movie and/or dinner? I shall
call you
later this week to find out when you are free. I have a trip to NYC on
Tuesday and
Wednesday, but Thursday or Friday should be fine.

I have  a speaking engagement on April 6 in Florida (a conference organized by
Florida Power and Light). This means I shall miss the meeting of
the Symphony Partners on that day. Please, keep me in mind for the following
meetings and I shall be very glad to join you.

Vince

Jlpnymex@aol.com on 03/06/2000 09:27:44 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: rodeo

Vince,
It was a pleasure to meet you last week at our Rodeo night.  I am glad you
could join us.

I am going to fax you the invitation to the Houston Symphony Partners party
that we discussed.  I hope you can attend.

Keep in touch and let's get together for lunch and/or seeing "American
Beauty."

Jana Phillips
713-658-9296


Jeff,

My sister is a Vice President for JPMorgan Chase Bank, and she supervises
construction and management of new buildings in Texas. She sent me the
following note regarding Enron Energy Services' handling of their utility
bills:

"On another note:  Enron handles the utility bills for JPMorganChase Bank on
a national basis, including Texas.  We are building a call center in San
Antonio, and the City of San Antonio (municipal electric) wants to charge
us a $50,000 deposit for new power because 11 out of the last 12 payments
made by Enron have been late, and late fees have been paid.  I am now going
to do an analysis on all of my regions.  I would like a local Enron
contact, if one exists.  Any ideas?"

Whom in Enron should I tell her to contact?

Thanks,

Steve Bailey
Enron Global E&P, Inc.
713-646-7865


fyi - meeting scheduled for this Thursday at 9:00.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bachand, Terri
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:34 PM
To:	Howard, Kevin A.
Subject:	RE: Dynegy due diligence
Importance:	High

The room number is EB 47C2.  The call in number is 877-773-8971.  Participant code 110372.  You will need to put in your leader code at the meeting.  I will send this to Mary Kay and Mr. Kilmer.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Howard, Kevin A.
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:04 PM
To:	Miller, Mary Kay; Kilmer III, Robert
Cc:	Bachand, Terri
Subject:	FW: Dynegy due diligence

Rod and I thought your participation would be very helpful.  I will email a call in number for you.

Kevin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Howard, Kevin A.
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 12:57 PM
To:	Fossum, Drew; Hayslett, Rod; Corman, Shelley; Lowry, Phil
Subject:	Dynegy due diligence

I spoke to John O'Shea today regarding Dynegy's continued due diligence for the pipelines.  We have scheduled an all day working session this Thursday beginning at 9:00 am (at Enron Building but room not confirmed). John will email to me tomorrow his due diligence requests.  In addition to commercial items, he would also like to cover operations and regulatory items.  Please make every effort to attend or designate a representative.  Drew, not sure who we need on the regulatory side?

Thanks,

Kevin


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/22/2000 04:33 PM -----

	John Viverito@ENRON
	08/16/2000 04:51 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: ISDA Documents

Hi Mark-

Hope all is well.

Attached you will find an e-mail that I sent to Alan regarding ISDA
documentation, for which I need approval from Houston.  Alan has informed me
that he left you a voicemail on this subject and I was hoping you could
provide me with guidance as to whom I should contact to obtain approval.

By separate e-mail, I will be forwarding weather derivative GTC's for use on
EOL with Enron Japan Corp. as the Enron counterparty.  Please also advise who
I should be in contact with to obtain the requisite approval for these GTC's,
as well.

Best regards,

John
----- Forwarded by John Viverito/Corp/Enron on 08/16/2000 04:40 AM -----

	John Viverito
	08/14/2000 03:30 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON
		 Subject: ISDA Documents

Alan-

Attached hereto, are marked-up copies of the following ISDA documents (based
on the US versions) which have been prepared using the credit worksheet for
The Mitsui Marine & Fire Insurance Co., Limited, in conjunction with B&M:

ISDA Schedule,
CSA and
Enron Corp. Guarantee.

The footnotes will disappear when the changes to the document are accepted.
It will be relatively straight forward to revise these for other
counterparties
such as IBJ and Sanwa, which apparently have the same credit rating.  I note
that we have not yet received the credit work sheet for IBJ or Sanwa.

Please note:

1.  There are still a number of "options" in the documents which I have not
completed as I am unsure as to the desired outcome.  These are indicated in
square
brackets.  Please let me know how you would like to deal with these;

2.   It will be important to make sure that the documents are carefully
checked to ensure that we have properly incorporated the various elections in
the documents;

3.   The agreements are governed by New York law and we should ensure that
appropriate counsel reviews same;and

4.   A number of features in the agreements (particularly the requirement for
a legal opinion and the use of L/Cs as form of collateral) are not common in
Japan and are likely to meet resistance from our counterparties.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,

John


Thank you very much. We will give it a try.

-----Original Message-----
From: Fleming, Rhonda [mailto:Rhonda.Fleming@txdps.state.tx.us]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:19 PM
To: Causholli, Monika
Cc: Gilmore, Debbie; Ronquillo, Lorraine
Subject: SSN requirement
Importance: High

Dear Ms. Causholli:

If your husband is not eligible to receive a Social Security number, he
needs to obtain a "letter of ineligibility" from the Social Security
Administration.  With this letter, the Department of Public Safety is able
to continue with the process of issuing him an original driver license.  He
will need to present proof of his identity in order to obtain an orginal
driver license and his foreign passport with a valid U.S. Visa included will
be sufficient.  Your husband will be required to take the written and
driving tests and pay the required fees.

If you have any other questions, please feel free to contact me at this
e-mail address or by phone at (512) 424-5062.

Sincerely,

Rhonda Fleming, Major
Driver License Division


Start Date: 2/7/02; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020704.txt
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/15/2000 04:00 PM -----

	Laine Borgman@ENRON
	08/11/2000 01:47 PM

		 To: Mike Fowler/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Trading Edge / Bond Link Agreement

Mike and Sara,

There is generally "no give" on the Enron language regarding affiliates
language which I have provided below.

"The following entities shall also be deemed to be included in the term
Subscriber and shall have the right to use the Service:  Subscriber's
wholly-owned subsidiaries and affiliated companies and those affiliated
companies in which Subscriber or one of its subsidiaries or affiliated
companies own an equity interest and which is under the direct or indirect
control of Subscriber or one of its subsidiaries or affiliated companies.
Furthermore, Subscriber shall also be allowed to have any agent or third
party service company or facility manager of Subscriber's IT functions to
assist it to the degree necesssary so that the Subscriber can fully access
and utilize the Service."

I will be happy to discuss any procedures we utilize and/or provisions in the
document.   It is also my understanding that Mike is expecting more contracts
of this nature so standardized and acceptable language will be to our
advantage.  Sara, our legal counsel is Mark Holsworth and he is "charged with
reviewing all the IP documents".

Let me hear from you soon.


Please note the call-in data for the Staff meeting conference call tomorrow,
which is currently scheduled to take place:

 Date:   Thursday, March 22
 Time:   8:30 AM PST
 Call-in:  (888) 476-6127
 Host (Paul?): 853807
 Participants:  498527

Thanks in advance for your participation.

Joseph

	Joseph Alamo
	03/21/2001 02:13 PM

To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: STAFF MEETING REMINDER & AGENDA REQUEST

Please note this reminder & request for Agenda items for upcoming Staff
Meeting & conference call,
which is currently scheduled to take place:

 Date:  Thursday, March 22
 Time:  8:30 AM PST

Please forward your Agenda items to me, if any, as soon as possible.

Thanks in advance for your cooperation,

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA


In terms of his deer hunting experience, he went to Uvalde with Z and I a couple of times and shot a doe or two, so he at least knows how to pull the trigger, unlike myself (allegedly).

								BC

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:04 AM
To: knipe3@msn.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Joe.Parks@enron.com; kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Brian Constantine
Subject: Possible new lease member

Deer All:

I have a person that might fit what we are looking for in the 8th spot or to
fill a gap left by Joe (who is currently unable to provide a firm response).

B.J. Johnson. Played football with Chad and I at Jesuit. Was a year a head
of us. Met Zander at UH in College and hung with he and Brian while they
were rooming together. Went to lawschool a few years after me. Is out and
doing well with at a well known plaintiff's lawfirm.
Nice guy. He mentioned a year or so ago to call him if we ever had a spot.
His dad used to take him hunting and BJ wants to return the favor. Looking
for a place he could take his dad once or twice a year, just to get out
there not to shoot deer. He has two small girls, is busier than I am and
would go no more than the rest of the Houston boys.

He is a good guy. Don't know much about his deer hunting experience, but I
don't care about that.

Chad and Brian give him the stamp of approval. My thought is we could
proceed as set with Chris and I splitting the 8th spot, but if Joe winds up
taking a job out of state (which is a possibility) we would be left with two
spots to fill and less time to do it. I think it might be best to offer this
spot to BJ and fill up all 8 spots, then if we lose Joe, Chris and I can be
the fall back plan.

Thoughts and comments from the McComb guys please.

Erik.

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


Prentice and I talked.  She's going to come back from the sports gig for the
dinner party.  Don't worry to much about the ganged-up-on-thing---Prentice is
cool.  She's ready to play.  She and I have been playing together (though our
respective repertoires, as designed by Avram, diverge more than they
converge).  We're getting pretty hot on Earl's breakdown, though.

P.S. Comes a point in one's life (like, when you're an adult), that you take
personal responsibility for your actions---"my dad made me do it" must simply
give way.  And "my dad made me an exquisite perfectionist" must REALLY really
give way.

Best,
Jeff

	"Scott Laughlin" <scottwl@hotmail.com>
	04/16/2001 01:37 PM

		 To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Party

Thanks for the nice e-mail.

I hope you can make the party. Cameron just told me that Prentice has some
sports thing happening; hopefully Friday's activities aren't too pressing.

As far as the music, Cameron is going to try to shed that Nazi side of her
that has been sort of instilled in her from her dad (or she attributes it to
her dad and his perfectionist stance towards music). On the other hand, I am
too sensitive to her, so we're both going to try to be very aware of both
those things. We've talked about it and realize that we're going to have to
get over it in order to enjoy the music. I think if she's more mellow, then
maybe Prentice won't feel so ganged up on? I hope not, anyway.

Just give us the total for Squaw, and we'll cut you a check.

See you this week,

Scott

>From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
>To: "Scott Laughlin" <scottwl@hotmail.com>
>Subject: RE: Party
>Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:49:04 -0700
>
>
>We'll be at the party, Overture, or no Overture.
>
>The Squaw thing ain't a problem.  No worries.  But let's settle soon.  My
>accounts are a little wacky these days---I'll explain later.  Thanks for
>letting me know.
>
>With the playing, there's a lot of little issues that I think are no big
>deal, but from our weekend at Squaw, it seems that there are some major
>fucking huge issues that you and the mighty C needed to work out.  If
>you've got those worked out, then I'm all fer playing again, though the
>next 2-3 weeks are pretty fucking ugly.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
>
>
>                     "Scott
>                     Laughlin"            To:     psellers@pacbell.net,
>cameron@perfect.com,
>                     <scottwl@hotm        Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
>                     ail.com>             cc:
>                                          Subject:     RE: Party
>                     04/16/2001
>                     12:00 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>All,
>
>I hope you guys can come this Friday to the dinner party at Sarah's house.
>It will be the four of us, Kent, Allison, Bobby, Sarah, and one of Sarah's
>friends called Mari, who was at the post-Hillman rock party. (Riddles is in
>
>La Paz, Mexico, being the smart guy that he is.) I have conceptualized the
>menu personally--hopefully Cameron and Sarah can carry it out. Also, I
>think
>there'll be a case of Overture. If that doesn't entice you, I don't know
>what will. I would really love it if you guys could be there. 31 is no big
>deal beyond an excuse to get dead fucked up...
>
>I also checked into the Squaw fiasco, and I hate to report that all that
>was
>charged to my card was a measly $24.61. So, we'll have to discuss the
>settling of that bill. Sorry for the inconvenience, Jeff.
>
>At the risk of sounding too much like Nancy... I think it would be nice if
>we could try to play music again. I picked up the damn mandolin so that I
>could actually play, not just practice in my room all alone! I know that
>there are many issues that arise between all of us, but maybe we can talk
>about them individually and together, and then try to simply be more
>mellow,
>have more fun. That doesn't mean that we can't "practice;"  however
>everything must be done in the spirit of enjoyment. All this is pretty
>obvious to all of us, and I don't need any of you to address this issue in
>e-mail, but we've had a lot of good times playing together, and I would
>like
>us to rise above this and move ahead, and perhaps get to a better place.
>After all, summer is on the way, and we want to be able to impress our
>teachers and mentors. I think of poor Bridget having to sit through the
>same
>show we gave her last year. What will she say to Ed!? If not, the sidekicks
>
>are going to have to go on tour.
>
>I love you all and hope this finds you well,
>
>Scotty
>
>
> >From: "Rogers, Sarah" <srogers@jamcracker.com>
> >To: 'Prentice Sellers' <psellers@pacbell.net>, Cameron Sellers
> ><cameron@perfect.com>, Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
> >CC: 'Scott Laughlin' <scottwl@hotmail.com>
> >Subject: RE: Party
> >Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 20:20:27 -0400
> >
> >We will also serve you food and beverages fit for the riff-raff -
>Domino's
> >stuffed-crust pizza, white zinfandel, that sort of thing.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Prentice Sellers [mailto:psellers@pacbell.net]
> >Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 5:16 PM
> >To: Cameron Sellers; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
> >Cc: 'Scott Laughlin'; 'Rogers, Sarah'
> >Subject: RE: Party
> >
> >
> >I don't know.  I kind of like the idea of being referred to only as "the
> >riff raff" during dinner.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:cameron@perfect.com]
> >Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 3:05 PM
> >To: 'PP'; 'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'
> >Cc: 'Scott Laughlin'; 'Rogers, Sarah'
> >Subject: RE: Party
> >
> >
> >FYI on attire for Scott's birthday dinner next Friday night (of which you
> >must attend)...
> >
> >
> >Cameron Sellers
> >Vice President, Business Development
> >PERFECT
> >1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
> >Palo Alto, CA 94303
> >cameron@perfect.com
> >650.798.3366 (direct dial)
> >650.269.3366 (cell)
> >650.858.1095 (fax)
> >
> >  -----Original Message-----
> >From:          Rogers, Sarah [mailto:srogers@jamcracker.com]
> >Sent:          Friday, April 13, 2001 2:58 PM
> >To:       'Cameron Sellers'
> >Cc:       'Scott Laughlin'
> >Subject:       RE: Party
> >
> >OK.  Please inform Prentice and Jeff of this rule.  Anyone not in
> >compliance
> >will be referred to only as "the riff-raff" over dinner.
> >
> >Fondly,
> >Sarah E. Rogers
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:cameron@perfect.com]
> >Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 3:02 PM
> >To: 'Rogers, Sarah'
> >Cc: 'Scott Laughlin'
> >Subject: RE: Party
> >
> >
> >Definitely dress up.  What I am is what I wear.
> >
> >Signed,
> >
> >Birthday Boy's Beloved
> >
> >
> >Cameron Sellers
> >Vice President, Business Development
> >PERFECT
> >1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
> >Palo Alto, CA 94303
> >cameron@perfect.com
> >650.798.3366 (direct dial)
> >650.269.3366 (cell)
> >650.858.1095 (fax)
> >
> >  -----Original Message-----
> >From:          Rogers, Sarah [mailto:srogers@jamcracker.com]
> >Sent:          Friday, April 13, 2001 2:52 PM
> >To:       Scott Laughlin (E-mail); Cameron Sellers (E-mail)
> >Subject:       Party
> >
> >Let me start off by thanking Scott for going with me to the New Yorker
> >thing
> >- that and the Oriental "massage" parlor afterwards were great!
> >
> >Secondly, Alison and I were thinking that it might be fun to get somewhat
> >dressed up for the party on Friday, since it is THE social event of the
> >season.  What do you guys think?  I'm not talking black-tie, but I am
> >looking for an excuse to wear a skirt or dress.  But I leave it up to the
> >birthday boy and the birthday boy's beloved.
> >
> >Please advise.
> >
> >________________
> >Sarah Rogers
> >Solutions Marketing
> >Jamcracker, Inc.
> >19000 Homestead Rd.
> >Cupertino, CA 95014
> >p: 408-725-4301
> >f: 408-725-4310
> >
> >www.jamcracker.com - Sounds like a job for Jamcracker.
> >
> >More about the Jamcracker solution:
> >www.jamcracker.com/solution/s1.shtml
> >
> >Jamcracker in the news:
> >www.jamcracker.com/news/n1.shtml
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


One of our potential buyers will be here at 9am on Thursday.  The scope of the meeting is to run through the integration schedule.  This is a very broad agenda and will probably be very interactive.	 I tried to put Ops first but it really doesn't make sense.

This really is a really rough agenda for you guys to decide upon but I wanted to set out the areas they wish to cover.

9 am 		Introduction
9:15 am		Infrastructure						Rub
10 am		IT - Development & Ops				Webb
11 am 		Mid Office Intergation Overview			Hall
12 noon		Accounting, cash etc Integration Overview		Colwell/Georges/Meyers

11am 		Tour of the building/infrastructure			Donovan

Wes - they want to cover bank accounts and cash in detail.

Some time during the morning they want a tour of the facilities - I am arranging with Bill Donovan.

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


Hi Sara,
Ok, I think I have properly referenced the side letter in this confirmation.
Please let me know what changes should be made.

P.S. I am leaving at noon today, so if I haven't heard from you by then, I
will give you a call tomorrow morning.
Thanks!
Kim x31647


The Power Desk directed me to give John Galperin, our broker with Salomon,
Smith Barney a call to get the May Entergy volumes.  John spoke to the NYMEX
and they came back with a figure of -0- contracts traded in May, with a total
of 34 Entergy contracts traded so far for 2000 (all months).


Jason,

As we discussed, attached are the December 31, 1999 financial
statements for your confidential use.
An original bound copy is also being sent today by courier.

Regards,

Rod

<<Fednav-1999 final audited.doc>>

 - Fednav-1999 final audited.doc


Attached is the list reflecting the approval of the initial Australian
counterparties to trade Australian financial power only.  David Minns will
have to get back to us about all the other products!

For the current U.S. list of counterparties, just mirror the approvals for
"US Power Financial Swaps".

I will review the list Debbie is sending me tomorrow to see if any of her
approvals conflicts with my earlier approvals, but I think we should be fine.


[IMAGE]
'CLICK 'CLICK 'CLICK

 [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   Paul Thomas  Based on your selection of industries and categories, we have found the following leads for you.         [IMAGE]        Construction & Facilities > Site Construction > Replace/Repair of Water Mains/Sewer/Wastewater  WATER MAIN AND APPURTENANT FIXTURES  NEW STORM INLETS AND ASSOCIATED APPUTENANCES  WASTE CONTAINER SERVICE\ SEWER CLEANER    ROAD SEWER & WATER REHABILITATION   SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS   RECONSTRUCTED SEWER  CONSTRUCTION   TEMPORARY SEWER FLOW MONITORING SERVICES   WAREHOUSE  RENOVATION   SLUDGE REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL SERVICES   WATER TREATMENT SERVICES    Energy > Power & Fuels > Fuel, Petroleum & Kerosene Procurement  LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS   NO. 2 FUEL OIL   Energy > Utility Related > Privatization  CNG INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATIZATION PROJECT FOR BUS DIVISIONS    Energy > Utility Related > Utilities Metering Products, Equipment & Services  INSTALLATION OF WELLFIELD & TELEMENTARY & PUMP CONTROLS         [IMAGE]            How to Sell More Technology in This Economy!  Increase Your Commissions and Hit Your      Quota Now.  FREE BDM Newsletter Click Here      [IMAGE]       If you have any questions or comments call us at 1(888)508-8783 ext 2 or email customerservice@trueadvantage.com .  Disable email alerts . You may disable these email alerts at any time.   Copyright 2001 TrueAdvantage, All Rights Reserved. Legal Disclaimer  Privacy Policy    [IMAGE]


As promised, we're forwarding the EOL agreements reviewed by Baker & McKenzie.

Regards,
Nony Flores


Sara:

Here are the updated floating price language paragraphs for the
indices which you requested, with the negative price sentence removed.

David


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 11:55
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kenneth Shulklapper                           09/21/2000 10:20 AM

To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun

---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
09:46 AM ---------------------------
To: Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Etiquette - rerun

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------

"Marcantel MM (Mitch)" <MMMarcantel@equiva.com> on 09/21/2000 06:47:47 AM
To: "'Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com'" <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>,
"'Chad.Landry@enron.com'" <Chad.Landry@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Etiquette - rerun

NIce Man! Especially #10

Blowjob Etiquette For Men, From Women:

> >  1. First and foremost, we are not obligated to do it.
> >
> >   2. Extension to rule #1 - So if you get one, be grateful.
> >
> >   3. I don't care WHAT they did in the porn video you
> >   saw, it is not standard practice to cum on someone's
> >   face.
> >
> >   4. Extension to rule #3 - No, I DON'T have to swallow.
> >
> >   5. My ears are NOT handles.
> >
> >   6. Extension to rule #5 - do not push on the top of
> >   my head. Last I heard, deep throat had been done. And
> >   additionally, do you really WANT puke on your dick?
> >
> >   7. I don't care HOW relaxed you get, it is NEVER OK
> >   to fart.
> >
> >   8. Having my period does not mean that it's "hummer
> >   week" - get it through your head - I'm bloated and I
> >   feel like shit so no, I don't feel particularly obligated
> >   to blow you just because YOU can't have sex right now.
> >
> >   9. Extension to #8 - "Blue Balls" might have worked
> >   on high school girls - if you're that desperate, go
> >   jerk off and leave me alone with my Midol.
> >
> >   10. If I have to pause to remove a pubic hair from my
> >   teeth, don't tell me I've just "wrecked it" for you.
> >
> >   11. Leaving me in bed while you go play video games
> >   immediately afterwards is highly inadvisable if you
> >   would like my behavior to be repeated in the future.
> >
> >   12. If you like how we do it, it's probably best not
> >   to speculate about the origins of our talent. Just enjoy
> >   the moment and be happy that we're good at it. See also
> >   rule #2 about gratitude.
> >
> >   13. No, it doesn't particularly taste good. And I don't
> >   care about the protein content.
> >
> >   14. No, I will NOT do it while you watch TV.
> >
> >   15. When you hear your friends complain about how they
> >   don't get blowjobs often enough, keep your mouth shut.
> >   It is inappropriate to either sympathize or brag.


Ben,

On the Wisconsin Public Service deal (WPS) please consider the following:

1.  One LM-6000 to be sited near Green Bay Wisconsin
2.  Will be configured in combined cycle mode with a HRSG
3.  100% of the output will go to an industrial customer of WPS

Key Questions

1.  What is the heat rate and Mw rating of our turbine at site conditions (20
degrees winter and 90 degrees summer)

2.  What is the water consumption with Sprint verses water injection

3.  What is a 10 year fixed gas price at chicago starting 6/1/01 on a
baseload volume of 10,000 mmbtu/d


EOL Logon: emclaug errol5enter


Here is Mark's model.


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PROS Revenue Management Announces Energy Profit Optimization Web Seminar Series

November 20, 2001-Houston- PROS Revenue Management, the world's leader in pricing and revenue optimization science and software, today announced a series of Energy Profit Optimization Web Seminars for the natural gas pipeline, storage, and trading industries in December.

PROS cordially invites you to attend this series which is scheduled as a set of four seminars as follows:
o December 5th: Pipeline Natural Gas Profit Optimization, 2:00 - 3:00pm Central Time
o December 6th: Storage Profit Optimization for Storage Operators, 2:00 - 3:00 pm Central Time
o December 6th: Storage Profit Optimization for Storage Traders, 3:30 - 4:30 pm Central Time
o December 7th: Trading Profit Optimization, 2:00 - 3:00 pm Central Time

Recently, a Wall Street analyst was quoted: "By 2001, companies that neglect to implement yield management techniques will become uncompetitive."  PROS Revenue Management solutions have been credited with delivering 6-8% incremental revenue and 20-100% incremental profits.   These Web seminars will allow industry leaders to learn from the experience PROS has gained in over 16 years of deploying these solutions.

These seminars will cover the basics of increasing revenues and profits while providing insight on how real-time data can be used to forecast demand elasticity and optimize profits.  Participants of previous PROS seminars have found these sessions to be extremely helpful in improving their business and making them more valuable to their respective organizations.

The Web format will allow participants to attend from remote locations, ask questions in real-time, and interact with the presenter through an Internet browser and toll-free telephone number.

This seminar is free of charge, spaces are limited for a first come first served basis.  More information and registration can be found at:  http://www.prosrm.com/events/energy_optimization_webcast_series.html, or send an email to AnnualConference@prosRM.com.  Interested participants will be contacted to receive conference access information.

About PROS
PROS Revenue Management is the world's leader in pricing and revenue optimization solutions and the pioneer and dominant provider of revenue management to the airline and energy industry. PROS provides system solutions to the airline, energy, cargo, rail, healthcare, and broadcast industries, and has licensed over 235 systems to more than 95 clients in 39 countries. PROS' clients include 15 of the top 25 carriers in the airline industry.

The PROS mission is to maximize the revenue of each client using PROS' world-leading revenue management science, systems solutions, and best practices business consulting. PROS' clients report annual incremental revenue increases of 6-8% as a result of revenue management. PROS' solutions forecast demand, optimize inventory, and provide dynamic pricing to maximize revenue.

Founded in 1985 in Houston, PROS Revenue Management has a six-year compounded revenue growth of 40%, in large part due to the intellectual capital of its staff. Nearly half of PROS' professional staff has advanced degrees and the staff speaks a cumulative total of 26 languages. The company is profitable with Year 2000 revenue of $29 million. For more information on PROS Revenue Management, please visit www.prosRM.com or call 713-335-5151.

Candy Haase
3100 Main Street, Suite 900
Houston, TX 77002 USA
713-335-5253
713-335-8144 fax
info@prosRM.com / www.prosRM.com


Yeah, that's why it's taking me so long to think of something to write.

Becky Pitre
03/06/2001 01:26 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Save me

Sure, now what is it you do?  Nothing!?

Robin Rodrigue
03/06/2001 01:30 PM
To: Becky Pitre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Save me

I told Gabriel about your hairdryer story.  He was appropriately disgusted.
I'm writing procedures for what I do...ya wanna come help me?


Put this on Kevin's review...THAT HE HELP YOU ANSWER QUESTIONS IN THAT
MEETING WITH SARA BOLKEN (MILLICAN & ASSOC.), THE ARCHIVE GROUP.
---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000 09:52 AM
---------------------------

"perfmgmt@enron.com"<perfmgmt on 11/02/2000 08:13:14 AM
To: dana.davis@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Year End 2000 Performance Feedback

NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
JOLLY, KEVIN                    MARNIE LAMB                     Oct 31, 2000


ARENA TO DISCUSS KOREA/JAPAN 2002 IN LIVE ONLINE CHAT ON THURSDAY AT 1 p.m. ET

CHICAGO (Tuesday, October 9, 2001) - U.S. Men's National Team head coach Bruce Arena will participate in the first-ever live, online chat on U.S. Soccer's newly re-designed website, www.ussoccer.com, on Thursday at 1 p.m. ET.  Arena will discuss the USA's historic 2-1 win against Jamaica as well as look ahead to next eight months leading up to Korea/Japan 2002.

Fans from across the United States can log on to www.ussoccer.com or www.ussoccerfan.com and register on-line to ask Arena a question.  Only registered members of ussoccerfan.com can ask questions.

Arena owns a career record of 23-11-11 and has posted an 8-4-3 record in his first trip through World Cup qualifying.  With the win on Sunday, the U.S. has now qualified for four consecutive World Cups for the first time in U.S. Soccer history.

The chat will be the first live, interactive chat on the new U.S. Soccer web site.  Fans will be able to log on to ussoccerfan.com just prior to 1 p.m. ET and will then be able to enter questions to ask Coach Arena.  Beginning at 1 p.m. ET, Arena will be online reading and answering questions, and fans will be able to read his answers as he responds.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To end your membership in ussoccerfan.com, please visit http://membership.ussoccer.com/member/unsubscribe.sps?msmid=1 and fill out an unsubscribe request. Thank you for supporting U.S. Soccer!


Jeff,

I hope all is well with you.

Sorry I missed you in NY a couple of weeks ago. I'd love to catch up with
you. Looks and sounds like you are still doing terrific things, and I use
you and Enron a great deal in conveying my message to investors and
managers.

Al Rappaport and I have completed our book, Expectations Investing, which
will be published by Harvard Business School Press in September. (See
attached preface). I'm really excited about the product, and I think you'll
find it interesting as well.

Al and I have asked the publisher to send you a more recent version for your
review. You'll probably get it in the next week or so.

Specifically, we'd be honored if you would endorse our book. The endorsers
we are targeting are a blue chip group, and we feel your perspective would
add a great deal.

Thanks in advance, and feel free to give me a shout if you have any
questions.

Michael

Michael J. Mauboussin
Chief US Investment Strategist
Credit Suisse First Boston
T: (212) 325-3108
F: (212) 325-8197

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.


Hello Sara,

Keegan told me that you had asked her today to send to you an updated
Brokerage Agreement Status Report.   We (the legal eagles) and the business
folks agreed at the last meeting on 3/28 that I would distribute the report
every two weeks - every other Thursday.  This works best for me and Keegan.
Under that schedule, Keegan and I have planned that the report would be ready
for group-wide distribution this Thursday.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


Take advantage of the following courses remaining for 2001.

Electric Business Understanding - November 27
The Electric Business Understanding Seminar will give a basic overview of the electric business for those with limited knowledge of this industry. This seminar is recommended for entry level to mid-level employees in either the gas or electric business or in businesses providing services to these industries.

Understanding Swaps - November 8 & 9 and December 13 & 14
This course is appropriate for all employees wishing to obtain a practical understanding of the basic natural gas and power derivative structures that are traded and marketed today. An emphasis is placed on understanding how financial tools are added to physical structures to meet the risk management needs of clients.

Understanding Options - November 27 & 28 and December 18 & 19
This course builds on our Derivatives 1 program and is appropriate for all employees looking to extend their knowledge of basic derivatives. Swaps and options are revisited, but from a more sophisticated perspective. Option pricing concepts are approached pragmatically, both from the trading and structuring/marketing perspectives. The program does not involve complex mathematics.

Structuring Natural Gas Transactions - November 19 & 20
This course builds on the DI - Applied Energy Derivatives program, focusing on deal structuring opportunities particular to the Natural Gas markets.  Participants will develop insights into the economic inter-relationships between the physical operations (pipelines, storage, generation, etc.) and their synthetic financial counterparts (basis, time spread and multi-fuel derivatives).  Emphasis is directed at identifying marketing opportunities that follow from these concepts.  This is not an introduction to natural gas markets.

For enrollment, or more information on these courses, please log on to http://elm.enron.com.


Hey guys,

Further to our meeting, here (courtesy of John T) are the addresses to view
the peaker data for our upcoming testing:

a. O:\_Dropbox\PeakerData\Peakers1999.htm
b. O:\_Dropbox\PeakerData\Peakers2000.htm

At the present time, these pages display on Microsoft Internet Explorer only.
Type in the above URLs in the address area of your IE. The pages refresh
automatically once every minute.

Cheers, --Scott


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.


Marla,

I just tried to tally this spreadsheet with mine. It doesn't. Please take a look at your spreadsheet and let me know how you calulated the numbers in the Total Reduction Column, they dont add up to the rows !

Mark Pickering
Chief Technology Officer

Enron Net Works, LLC

  _____

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barnard, Marla
Sent:	26 November 2001 08:37
To:	Pickering, Mark; Beck, Sally
Cc:	Piper, Greg
Subject:	RE: ENW Summary

I sent the summary below to Greg yesterday, but want to reconfirm with everyone today - particularly the contract numbers.  The highlighted columns represent those I don't feel are accurate at this point.   I will be meeting individually with everyone to review their spreadsheets one more time and begin discussing the process which now is to start Wednesday.  Below is the draft summary I have at this point - the contractor numbers are the ones in particular I need to get verified.

 << File: ENWsummary4.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pickering, Mark
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 8:28 AM
To:	Piper, Greg; Barnard, Marla
Cc:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	RE: ENW Summary

Havent seen the summary.

Mark Pickering
Chief Technology Officer

Enron Net Works, LLC

  _____

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Piper, Greg
Sent:	26 November 2001 08:24
To:	Barnard, Marla
Cc:	Pickering, Mark; Beck, Sally
Subject:	RE: ENW Summary

Has everyone named on this list approved/confirmed the numbers by their name?

Thanks.

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barnard, Marla
Sent:	Sunday, November 25, 2001 5:49 PM
To:	Piper, Greg
Subject:	ENW Summary

Below is the email copy of the ENW summary.  The highlighted areas indicated follow-up needed to ensure appropriate contractor numbers.

 << File: ENWsummary4.xls >>


Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 1/19/00.

Regards
Molly


----------------------------------------------------------------------
August 21, 2000 (AP)
California regulators cut San Diego electricity rates in close vote
MICHAEL LIEDTKE, AP Business Writer

   (08-21) 16:28 PDT SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- With consumers howling about
unexpectedly high electric bills this summer, California's Public Utility
Commission took a step back from deregulation and cut rates for most San
Diego residents by 43 percent, so that most customers will pay no more
than $68 per month through January.
   By a 3-2 margin, the commission also approved a rate cut for small
businesses and school districts, resulting in estimated bills of $220 a
month for customers that don't exceed strict usage limits of 1,500
kilowatt hours.
   "This isn't going to help anybody," muttered San Diego restaurateur Susan
Bauman as she waved a $10,284 electricity bill showing one of her two
businesses used 30,000 kilowatt hours in July.
   PUC Commissioner Henry Duque, who drafted the proposal, said it provides
some relief while encouraging energy conservation, since customers who
exceed the usage limits will have to continue paying market rates.
   Other San Diegans who attended the hearing called the action woefully
inadequate.
   "We are bleeding to death and this will not stop the hemorrhaging," said
San Diego Supervisor Dianne Jacob. "We are going to die unless we get more
help."
   The PUC rejected an alternative proposal that would have imposed price
controls through 2003 and lowered bills by 60 percent from current levels.
   Ed Guiles, CEO of San Diego Gas & Electric Co., said the alternative would
have accumulated hundreds of millions of dollars in deferred costs. With
interest, those costs ultimately would be passed on to customers beginning
in 2004.
   But even the measure that did pass could end up costing San Diego
customers as much as $100 million after 2001, Guiles said.
   "This is an interim solution that stabilizes the bills for consumers but
does not get to the root part of the problem of high energy prices,"
Guiles said.
   Consumer advocates say customers should not be forced to pay for the
higher rates, now or in the future.
   "The proposals are really just a ruse. They move the burden from the
consumers' checkbook to their credit cards to be paid at a future date,"
said Doug Heller of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, a
Santa Monica watchdog.
   The deregulation of the state's $20 billion electrical power industry --
imposed under a complex 1996 law that phases in the effects from south to
north -- was supposed to lower prices by creating greater competition.
   But demand has outstripped electricity supplies, due to a growing
population, booming high-tech economy, and less electricity available from
neighboring states that haven't deregulated their systems.
   A sweltering summer in much of California hasn't helped, and cost hikes
and continuing power shortages that caused rolling "brownouts" in the San
Francisco Bay area in June have spurred demands of a repeal.
   Monday's action came at an emergency meeting called at the request of Gov.
Gray Davis, who asked the commission to lower soaring electric bills that
have sparked outrage in California's second largest city -- and fears in
other California regions due to buy electricity on the open market as
early as next year.
   Residential and business customers who receive their power from SDG&E have
seen their electric bills double or even quadruple since their rates were
deregulated in June.
   Jacob and other San Diego-area politicians on hand at San Francisco's
hearings said they were headed to Sacramento to lobby for a state law
proposing to revert rates to 1996 prices. The proposal doesn't specify who
would pay for the rollback.
   Other critics said the PUC's rate limits won't help elderly and sick
people who must run their air conditioning during the hot summer months.
Opponents also warned that small businesses still might have to lay off
employees or move from the area to offset their rising expenses.
   "What we have done is lower the rates for turning on your TV or running
your refrigerator, but basically what we're telling people is, don't turn
on your air conditioner," said PUC Commissioner Carl Wood, who wanted the
steeper rate cut that failed Monday.
   The cap adopted Monday applies to residential customers who limit usage to
500 kilowatts per month. About 70 percent of homes in San Diego fall under
the cap, estimated Duque.
   The prevailing market rate has soared under deregulation.
   On August 13, the average wholesale price for San Diego electricity was
$117 per megawatt hour, up from $25 per megawatt hour at a comparable time
last year, said Wood.
   The estimated $68 cap for residential customers will remain in effect
through January 2001 and then increase to a projected $75 cap through
December 2001.
   The projected $220 cap on electric bills that applies to businesses and
school districts will increase to $240 per month after January.
   Under deregulation, private utilities were required to sell off their
power plants and open their markets to electrical resellers, and buy power
on the open market, paying an amount that may fluctuate from day to day.
   But the state has been shunned by some power developers who are uncertain
about deregulation, and few new power plants are in the works.

   ------=?   On the Net:?   California PUC: http://www.cpuc.ca.gov?   California ISO: http://www2.caiso.com?   Energy Department electricity statistics: http://www.eia.doe.gov?   North American Electric Reliability Council: http://www.nerc.com?   Utility Consumers Action Network: http://www.ucan.org???----------------------------------------------------------------------?Copyright 2000 AP?


All,

Since we have experienced some problems with old diskette, I saved Due
Diligence Index for all 9 projects in new diskette. I will upload DD Index
tomorrow. Jin


3/14/02
9:50 AM Per Tammi Depaolis (832-397-1728) at Sequent.  Tammi spoke to Lisa Guthrie (205-325-3816) at Sonat to find out what flexibility Sequent would have taking out the parked gas.  Lisa said she didn't know if Enron could sell the gas.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent:	Wednesday, March 13, 2002 7:29 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'
Cc:	Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Sanchez, Christina; Polsky, Phil; 'Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)'; Dhont, Margaret
Subject:	RE: Sonat Park & Loan

Thanks for the information.  Sell, Sell, Sell!  Sell it all to Sequent for March if you can get a good bid and have them agree to pay the moment we/they get confirmation on the nomination.  Try to get other bids to validate as best you can.  Do not talk to Sonat unless you have to - - asking permission is not advisable.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, March 13, 2002 4:38 PM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'
Cc:	Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Sanchez, Christina; Polsky, Phil; Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail); Dhont, Margaret
Subject:	Sonat Park & Loan

Ruth Concannon told me we want to try and sell the parked gas on Sonat.  This is what we have found out over the last 2 days.

ENA no longer has the ability to do nominations on Sonat's scheduling Christina Sanchez (ENA Scheduler) believes that under normal conditions, we can sell the parked gas on Sonat without doing any nominations.  The party we sell the gas to would nominate the gas away from a specific PAL meter and reference our PAL contract as the upstream contract.  Today I spoke with Tammi Depaolis at Sequent - she is interested in buying the gas and she might prepay for it.  I need to know;

1.  What volume to sell, I assume we are talking about 188,949 dth on deal #1222, which means we ignore the loaned volume of 96,000 dth on deal #1424.
2.  What period do I sell the gas for?  All out by March 31st subject to the operational conditions on the pipeline?  Or base load in April?  I prefer all out by March 31st but I would like to ask the pipeline if that's ok?
3.  How many bids do I need to get?  I called Sequent because I know they are active on Sonat.
4.  This may not matter but did Sonat ever pay us for the gas ENA sold them in January 2002 (see items in red down below).

Tammi will probably check with the pipeline to see if its ok to take our gas.  I don't want to sell gas to someone then find out the pipeline will not let them take it.

All of my previous notes are shown below in blue.

Summary:  Sonat has netted our Parked Gas Balance with our Loaned Gas Balance and filed a motion with the courts to retain the remaining Parked Gas Balance, 92,949 dth per my conversation with Sonat, to offset $879,030.42 ENA owes Sonat for the purchase of gas in October 2001.  According to Sonat, the payment was due November 26, 2001 but ENA did not pay.  Sonat's motion is set to be reviewed by the court on March 6th.

2/19/02  History  - Per Dave Dyer (205-326-2007) at Sonat
ENA has 2 Park & Loan (PAL) contracts with Sonat.  All PAL's with Sonat are under master contract PAL1001.  Sonat assigns a deal number to each deal under this contract.

Deal #1424 - ENA borrowed a total of 96,000 dth from Nov 3rd-5th and has not paid this back.  ENA still owes Sonat 96,000 dth.  The terms of the deal were to payback Sonat anytime with 3 days notice on any 3 days on 2002,   SONAT ONLY CHARGED ENA $96.00 FOR THIS DEAL, because Sonat needed to get gas off the system.

Deal #1222 - ENA parked 309,192 dth in August to come out in Jan 2002.  Sonat let ENA withdraw 42,951 on 11/29/01 leaving a balance of 266,241 dth.  In Jan 2002, ENA withdrew 8,588 dth per day for the 1st-9th.  That left a balance of 188,949 dth.  On Jan 8th, 2002, Sonat sent a letter stating that Sonat will hold on to the remaining to balance to offset 1) the Loaned gas on deal #1424 (96,000 dth) and 2) to offset dollars ENA has not paid Sonat for gas Sonat sold to ENA in October 2001.  According to Sonat, the remaining balance on this deal is 92,949 dth = [309,192 parked in Aug - 42,951 w/d in Nov - 77,292 w/d in Jan - 92,000 balance on #1424].  According to Sonat's letter, Sonat has filed the appropriate motion for court approval for the offsets.  According to Dave, ENA is being billed $.00305 x daily balance in this account.  ENA should have paid some bigger amount when the gas was parked in August.

Other items;
ENA purchased system supply from Sonat in October 2001.  ENA purchased 286,998 at an average price of $3.063 = $879,030.42.  According to Sonat, ENA did not pay for this before Enron declared bankruptcy.  ENA also sold Sonat gas - 16,000 dth day at $2.885 (sitara #1172076) in January 2002 and 10,000 dth day at $2.955 in May 2002 (sitara #1172087).  ENA used 77,292 dth of the parked gas on deal #1222 to supply the 16,000 dth before Sonat stopped ENA from withdrawing from the park.  ENA defaulted on 418,708 dth of the Sonat deal in January.

Sonat's in house legal counsel is Patti Frances (205-325-7696).  I left a message for Patti to call me.

2/20/02
Patti Frances returned my call.  Patti said the motion is currently set to be reviewed by the court on March 6th.  I asked Patti if there were any penalties for not performing on the Jan 2002 sale to Sonat and if Sonat was going to pay for the 77,292 dth (8,588 dth per day for Jan 1st - 9th) that ENA did supply.  Patti said she didn't think there were penalties but she would verify that and see if they were going to pay.  I also asked her if Sonat is still honoring the ENA sale to Sonat in May 2002 and if Sonat would pay ENA if ENA performed.  She will check on it and call me back.

2/25/02
Per Kay Mann - Mark Ellenberg is the legal counsel assigned to this contract.
1:10 PM.  Left a follow-up message for Patti Frances regarding our conversation on 2/20/02.

3/11/02
Per Ruth - Mark Ellenberg wants us to try and pull the gas out of the Sonat Pal.  Christina Sanchez (ENA Scheduler) will find out 1) if we still have access to Sonat's EBB and 2) if we can nominate the gas out of the PAL's.

3/13/02
Per Christina - ENA's ID's and passwords have been cancelled.  Christina called Barbara Gilbert (205-325-7310), ENA's account rep at Sonat - Barbara said she would talk about this issue with Sonat's legal counsel and see if its ok to set up ENA with an ID.  Christina also believes we could sell the gas without doing any nominations.  The party we sell the gas to would use a specific PAL's meter and reference our PAL contract as the upstream.
3:30 PM  Tammi Depaolis (832-397-1728) at Sequent is interested in buying this gas and she might prepay to get it.  She will see if they can take the gas without ENA doing a nomination.  I need to verify the volume parked and when I want Sonat to take it out.
3:40 PM  Barbara is waiting to hear from Sonat's legal department.


This request has been pending your approval for  39 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000057285&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000057285
Request Create Date : 8/30/01 5:59:30 PM
Requested For       : erik.simpson@enron.com
Resource Name       : Market Data Kobra Basic Energy
Resource Type       : Applications


I will see you there.


We are long 10mw SP15 from the APX for HE 1-10 at a price of $15.  EES is short so you should be able to offset the two.  The deal is not in Caps or Enpower.

thanks,

ryan


Please make sure to check the new work schedule for March.  Bill has made a
few changes and it should be the last time for the month.

Any questions see Bill.

Regards,

Bert Meyers


Richard-
 The following is a list of  initial due diligence items that we need
to review in advance of a more comprehensive meeting:

1. All closing documents for the Enron stock purchase and loan.

2. Corporate organizational chart for both personnel and legal entities.

3. All audited and interim financials on Ecogas since January of 1999 (on an
entity by entity basis, if available).

4. List of payables on a per entity basis.

5. All major customer contracts (e.g. Frito Lay), real property leases and
any leases at waste disposal sites.

6. Enron consulting agreement and any employment agreements.

7. Organizational documents for each entity.

8. List of intercompany payables.

9. All documents relating to long tem debt (e.g. bonds) and notes on trade
payables.

10. All internal Enron business and financial reports evaluating whether to
make the investment and any subsequent Enron business or financial reports
evaluating the business.

11. Legal analysis prepared by counsel to Enron regarding Ecogas.

12. Ecogas board minutes since July of 1999.

13. Any Ecogas business plans submitted to Enron.

14. Any appraisals or valuations of Egogas or its assets.

15. Information submitted to IRS in connection with request for private
letter ruling on Section 40 tax credits.

16. List of any transfers made to ENA by Ecogas since July of 1999.

17. Documents relating to Fidelity tax credits.

18. Documents relating to Freshgas letter of credit.

These documents should give us a good start in evaluating the situation.
Please feel free to send them to me on a piecemeal basis. Thanks again for
using V&E on this engagement and I very much look forward to working with
you and your team.

Paul Heath
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
3700 Trammell Crow Center
2001 Ross Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75201-2975
Phone 214.220.7976
Fax 214.999.7976
E-mail pheath@velaw.com

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
Contains attorney-client communications and or attorney work product


Mark -- any thoughts on the below stuff?

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3893
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490
----- Forwarded by Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001 03:35 AM -----

	John Applegate <japplegate@houstonstreet.com>
	04/21/2001 03:37 PM

		 To: "Bob Shults (E-mail)" <bob.shults@enron.com>
		 cc: "Travis McCullough (E-mail)" <Travis.McCullough@enron.com>,
"'mark.greenberg@enron.com'" <mark.greenberg@enron.com>,
"'kevin.meredith@enron.com'" <kevin.meredith@enron.com>, John Wyman
<jwyman@houstonstreet.com>
		 Subject: Legal Entities

Gentlemen:

Pursuant to the Posting Agreement, as amended, Exhibit I, section 4 "display
of legal entities", HSE would like to propose the following method of
displaying Enron as a legal entity in our ratings (credit) system:

Process:

*  representative from each company that has signed a trading agreement with
HSE (including Enron posting language) assigns a ratings administrator.
*  ratings administrator is assigned a user ID and password to access a
web-based ratings system.
*  ratings administrator "clicks"  button to turn on / off ratings
selections by company.

Enron would be displayed as followed:

****************************************************************************
*******************************

    Financial Financial Physical
Physical
    Buy From Sell To  Buy From
Sell To

Enron North America Corp.        <<...>>                  <<...>>
 <<...>>                      <<...>>
(or Houston Pipe Line Company (HPL) for US physical gas transactions
delivered to points inside Texas.)

****************************************************************************
*******************************

At this point, HSE would find it very difficult to offer separate ratings
choices for Enron North America Corp. and Houston Pipe Line company because
the postings we receive from Enron do not differentiate between the two
companies; they all come to HSE under the heading "EOL_MSTR".

Please confirm whether or not this method of displaying the EOL legal
entities is acceptable to Enron.

Please also let us know if any of the major energy companies have credit
with Enron North America Corp., but not with Houston Pipe Line Company.  If
this is the case, then we will have to re-think how this information is
displayed on HoustonStreet's credit system because it may prohibit HSE
customers from rating Enron positively on physical gas.

Thank You,
John

From: Kevin.Meredith@enron.com
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 3:16 PM
To: lbradley@houstonstreet.com; japplegate@houstonstreet.com
Cc: Sheri.Thomas@enron.com; Matt.Motsinger@enron.com;
Jennifer.deBoisblanc.Denny@enron.com; Ricky.Oberai@enron.com
Subject: Enron Entity details

The following is the relational breakout of Enron Commodities and Entity
that trades the Commodity.

1. US Financial Gas & Power = "Enron North America Corp."
2. US Physical Power = "Enron Power Marketing, Inc."
3. US Physical Gas:
     A. Non-Texas = "Enron North America Corp."
     B. Texas = "Houston Pipe Line Company (HPL)"

The only location that falls under both Schedule A and HPL is Katy.  The
reason for this is that HPL is used only for physical Texas deals.  Katy,
under Schedule A, is only to be physical and HSC is only to be financial.
All finacial deals belong to ENA, so HSC belongs to ENA.  Permian falls
under the physical heading of "Non-Tx", which goes to ENA as well.

If you have any further questions, let me know.

Kevin

John Applegate
Vice President
Business Development
(603) 766-8706
 <<John Applegate.vcf>>

 - John Applegate.vcf


Second CA Merchant Storage Field Pushes Back Opening
California's second merchant underground natural gas storage project near Sacramento began injecting supplies this month, but its commercial start-up date has been pushed back to Dec. 1, according to the California operations manager for Houston-based Western Hub Properties LLC, the developer.
Although it is not fully subscribed more than half the capacity is under contract, according to Jim Fossum, the in-state manager for Western Hub, which was purchased last summer by a partnership of Aquila Inc and ArcLight Energy Partners Fund in a $220 million deal that is still several months away from approval from the California Public Utilities Commission.
The Lodi Storage Project near the town of Lodi, CA, about 35 miles south of the state capital, will have "high-performance, quick-cycle-capabilities" in a project that stores 12 Bcf of natural gas with a 500 MMcf/d withdrawal rate and 400 MMcf/d injection rate.
Fossum said Western Hub also is pursuing a second merchant storage project in the southern half of the state around Bakersfield in the Wheeler Ridge area close to the nexus of all the major interstate natural gas pipeline coming into California. That project, he said, is not included in the Aquila partnership purchase at this time, and will be developed initial by a still-to-be-named company using some of the same personnel that developed Lodi.
The same group also has a potential storage site identified in Texas, near San Antonio.


.disclaimer {  font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; line-height: normal; font-weight: bold; color: #FFFFFF; text-decoration: none} .header {  font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; line-height: normal; font-weight: bold; color: #FFFFFF; text-decoration: none} .letterbold {  font-family: Arial; font-size: 8pt; font-style: normal; line-height: normal; font-weight: bold; color: #000000; text-decoration: none} .text {  font-family: Arial; font-size: 8pt; font-style: normal; line-height: normal; font-weight: normal; color: #000000; text-decoration: none} .linked {  font-family: Arial; font-size: 8pt; font-style: normal; line-height: normal; font-weight: normal; color: #000000; text-decoration: none} .letter {  font-family: Arial; font-size: 8pt; font-style: normal; line-height: normal; font-weight: normal; color: #333333; text-decoration: none} .footer {  font-family: Arial; font-size: 8pt; font-style: normal; line-height: normal; font-weight: normal; color: #FFFFFF; text-decoration: none} .hotseller {  font-family: Arial; font-size: 8pt; font-style: normal; line-height: normal; font-weight: normal; color: #000000; text-decoration: none} .name {  font-family: Arial; font-size: 14pt; font-style: normal; line-height: normal; font-weight: bold; color: #000000; text-decoration: none} .exclusive {  FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: #FF0000; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; TEXT-DECORATION: none} .letter02 {  font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: italic; line-height: normal; font-weight: normal; color: #000000; text-decoration: none}   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]         [IMAGE]   Dear Charles,  If loving them is write,  then you can't go wrong! In fact, you can use  your words to win. Put on your creative cap and  enter our "Hand us a line for your Valentine (sm)"   card message writing contest for a chance to win  a dream Caribbean vacation, Valentine's Day gifts  from 1-800-FLOWERS.COM
 and other fabulous  prizes. It's never been easier to speak the language  of love and WIN! Visit our web site to enter and  for complete contest details.  Now that you're in a loving mood, visit our  Valentine's  Day Collection  to find thoughtful Valentine's  Day gifts under $40* that are ready to go straight  from your heart to theirs. Now through January  31st, you can SAVE  $20* on the Thirty  Stem Tulip Bouquet  delivered on or before  February 8th (regularly $54.99, now $34.99). Order  early so Cupid can get a head start!   From your friends at 1-800-FLOWERS.COM
 Call 1-800-FLOWERS
 (1-800-356-9377), Click  (www.1800flowers.com) or Come in! AOL Keyword: 1800flowers  Offer valid through 1/31/02.  This email was sent to CHUCK.RANDALL@ENRON.COM     Special Value    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Thirty Stem Tulip Bouquet  Mauve Bear with Heart Candy Box  Sentimental ValentineTM  CheriTM Bear and Heart Candle Gift Set       Register  Now & Member Benefits  Personalized  Greetings  Gift  Certificates    Remove  Me  Contact  Us  Security  & Privacy  Disclaimer * Store  Locator