Will do.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com [mailto:Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 2:43 PM
To: David.Yeres@CliffordChance.com
Subject: Re:

David:

It was good to see you also.  I am only available on the 14th.  I would
like you to come to Enron and talk about the audit and certain key
provisions in the trading agreements with the top trading lawyers.  Give
Mark Taylor a call at 713-853-7459; he is GC of the financial trading.

Regards,

Mark

David.Yeres@Clifford

Chance.com                  To:
mark.e.haedicke@enron.com
cc:
Mark.Harding@CliffordChance.com, Claude.Brown@CliffordChance.com,
04/09/2001 04:40 PM
Kersten.Schenck@CliffordChance.com
Subject:

Mark, it was good to see you Thursday.  My next visit to Houston is
scheduled for May 14 and 15.  I will be making a presentation concerning
the
legal consequences of market abuse in electricity trading to a Risk
Magazine
Conference on the 14th.  As we discussed last week, I would, if you wish,
be
pleased to speak to your colleagues on the same subject during my visit.  I
would also be pleased to discuss the contract audit issues, focusing on the
key provisions that have been, or we expect to be, critical from a
financial
or reputational perspective.  In that regard, it would be helpful to
discuss
Enron' experience with agreements/provisions before finalizing my remarks.
Perhaps you could identify someone on your staff with whom I may speak.

Best regards.

David Yeres
Clifford Chance Rogers & Wells LLP
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Tel:  (212) 878-8075
Fax: (212) 878-8027
Email: david.yeres@cliffordchance.com

*******

This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or
otherwise protected from disclosure.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and
any attachment from your system.  If you are not the intended recipient you
must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any
other person.

For further information about Clifford Chance please see our website at
http://www.cliffordchance.com or refer to any Clifford Chance office.


I assume your working on this.  You owe me on the web page.

1.  Pricing - Lon's sheet.

2. Power Sheets

3. Peggy's volume and number of trades sheet.


Dear Real-Timers,

We are having the same problem with Montana Power's checkout as we had last
month: the volume of disputes is overwhelming!!

I have looked at the Inc sheets and found that EnPower matches the Inc.
sheets.
But in fairness to MPC's disputes, last month when I trusted the Inc sheets,
and I pulled the tapes, I found that our Inc. sheets were wrong in a number
of places.

Mike and I are doing the March 2001 checkout and are having trouble finding
your logs, your notebooks, or any information regarding the dates in question.

I am listing below the dates and HE that we are having disputes for.  Please
look at your logs and let me know the MW value, price, and who you spoke to
at MPC at what time.  Please do not give me what the Inc sheets say, as Mike
and I have already looked at them.

I expect an answer from each of you ASAP.

3/01/01  Meyers / Guzman   HE 1 (sold to WESCO) HE 4 (sold to PowerEx)
3/02/01  Causholli/Salisbury (sent to Holden) HE 8 (sold to Sempra)
3/06/01  Meyers/Salisbury & Solberg/Harasin  HE 13 ( 2 deals ) HE 21 (sold to
Snohomish)
3/08/01  Meyers/Harasin   HE 1 (sold to Sempra) HE 2 (sold to Sempra)
3/10/01  Causholli/Solberg & Slinger/Guzman  HE 7 (not in INC, but in
EnPower)    HE 8 ( sold to Powerex)   HE 15 (slod to PSPL)
3/11/01  Meyers/Guzman   HE 8 (sold to PowerEx)  HE 9 (sold to PowerEx)
3/13/01  Causholli/Porter   HE 9 (sold to WESCO)
3/14/01  Salisbury/Meyers/Linder  HE 2 (2 deals)
3/16/01  Salisbury/Porter & Causholli HE 4 (sold to SCL)  HE 20 (sold to PSPL)
3/21/01   Porter/Guzman   HE 6 (not in Inc)
3/23/01  Meyers/Linder   HE 13 (sold to WESCO)
3/28/01  Salisbury/Slinger & Dean  HE 5 (sold to PSPL)

As you can see, the number of dusputes is too large.  Please respond as soon
as possible so that we can chack out this week.  MPC is calling me every day.

Thanks for your help,

Virginia


Can I please get an NG run asap. Thanks.


Please submit any changes or questions about the hotlist by the end of the day today.

Thanks

Trey Hardy


Attached is revised draft that incorporates all of PG&E's earlier comments
and is marked to show my proposed revisions. Please review and let me know if
you have any comments.  If possible, we should send back to PG&E today.
Several Letters of Credit are soon to expire and we will otherwise need to
provide substitute Letters by the 11th.

As always, thanks for everyone's help.

Elizabeth
713 853 6349


Justin,

Per the email below, before we respond to Glencore we just wanted to make
sure that you haven't made any agreements with Glencore with respect to
choice of law for the online trades that would subject them to UK law.

I don't want to talk to them without checking with you first since this is
one of the true counterparties that we are trading with on both sides of the
Atlantic.

By the way, I heard you had some really good news.  I'm so happy for you!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/29/2001 01:53 PM -----

	Diane Anderson@ENRON
	05/29/2001 11:29 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Patrick Mulvany/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EOL Trades with Glencore Commodities Limited

Tana -

Please see the email below - can you please look into Glencore's
assertion that their EOL trades (vs. ENA) should be governed under English
law.

Thanks,
Diane
3.0443

---------------------- Forwarded by Diane Anderson/NA/Enron on 05/29/2001
11:26 AM ---------------------------
From: Debbie Nicholls/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 05/29/2001 03:42 PM GDT
To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane
Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: EOL Trades with Glencore Commodities Limited

Hi,

I have received a call from Miriam in Glencore re EOL transactions.  Her
concerned are that she does not receive the confirmations within 24 Hours
(from Houston) of the deal being dealt which we are subject to in London and
she would like to see this from ENA.  Also, when Glencore agreed to trade EOL
transactions they stipulated that English law be used for all transactions,
presuming these would be the same from ENA.  She has tried to call but only
gets voice mail, could you please contact her to discuss these and any other
issues she has with EOL.

Tel: 44 20 7412 3190

Regards,

Debbie


I'll get Kathleen to do it, as she has my current favorite form.  Thanks
anyway.

Kay

From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 02/26/2001 06:03 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: CA - Onondaga

The sale of the cash flow interest is a new deal that I am not working on and
I think that the CA that Fred needs is to cover bidders for the purchase of
the cash flow interest.  I will get Ed to prepare the CA if you wish.


Drew, here is the memo.  I know you will add your own spin before sending it
on to Cordes.  However, if there is anything you want me to fix, please do
not hesitate to call.


Greetings:

Hope everyone had a pleasant 4th.

I've read the respective Burton and Hertzberg language on amending AB 1X.
The Burton language looks cleaner and simpler, though there may be reasons to
include some of the Hertzberg language, too.

I'm proposing to the group the following as potential amendments to the bond
bill.  I would appreciate your feedback.  The amendments would be as follows:

Customers who were on Direct Access when DWR started buying power (Jan.
17th?), and are still on Direct Access when the bill passes, should be exempt
from paying for the bonds.

In short, customers should not be forced to pay for power twice--once from
their ESP, and once from DWR.  Since these customers receive power services
from their ESP, they never consumed DWR power in the first place and it
wouldn't be fair to require them to pay for it.

Customers who have been utility customers since DWR started buying power but
subsequently switched to Direct Access should only pay for power provided by
DWR that they actually consumed, no more and no less.

For example, if a customer was a utility customer when DWR started buying
power but switched to Direct Access on May 1st, then the customer would only
be responsible for reimbursing DWR for power deliveries that took place from
Jan. 17th thru April 30th.

I believe that we agreed on these concepts during the negotiations that took
place over the past 4-5 weeks.  Or if we didn't explicitly agree during the
talks, they seem to be principles on which we ought to be able to agree
pretty easily now. And rather than leave the issue hanging, which can create
unnecessary and costly uncertainty for customers, I suggest that we include
very clear and simple legislative language in the bond bill clarifying what
customers' obligations are.  Your thoughts are appreciated.

In addition, we have talked quite a bit about providing customers with
incentives in the attempt to get California out of the energy hole that it
finds itself in.  Providing (20KW and above) customers with an incentive to
switch to Direct Access as soon as possible could 1) reduce the net short
position that the state (and ultimately consumers) have to finance, thereby
reducing spot purchases and price volatility,  2) reduce electricity
purchasing costs, and 3) reduce the burden on the state budget.

With this in mind, I'm also proposing that the group consider an amendment to
the bond bill that would exempt from bond charges any customer that switches
to Direct Access by September 1st.

Finally, it seems odd that the language directing the PUC to suspend Direct
Access is still in the bill.  If a dedicated rate component is created, that
seems to eliminate altogether the need to suspend Direct Access.  And if
that's the case, would it make sense to delete that language from the bill?

Look forward to your comments and working with you to get support for and
passage of the "core/noncore" proposal.

Best,
Jeff


Who keeps the books for Bridgeline?  In other words, how can we find out if they have paid their $1,000,000?  Please let me know.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:50 PM
To:	Gruesen, Karen
Cc:	Zisman, Stuart; Redmond, Brian
Subject:	Dow Invoice

I have reviewed the Dow Agreement wrt to the Dow Invoice Dated November 29, 2001 and have found the following

1.  2Q Lease Fee - $115,000
    3Q Lease Fee - $195,500.

Section 3.3 of the Agreement (as amended) provides for a lease fee of $25,000 per BCF based on 4.6 BCF until the date that gas injections begin in Enron's well (which was July 31, 2001) and a fee of $50,000 per BCF based on 4.6 BCF thereafter.  The fees are assessed per calendar quarter.  The above fees look to be OK.

2.  Final Mining Fee - $23,362.40
     Final Land Purchase Offset - ($47,013.75)

Section 6.5 through 6.8 of the Agreement provide for a detailed calculation of the Brine Fee due Dow based on the amount of salt removed from Enron's new well and a corresponding credit back to Enron for the conveyance of a 57.865 acres tract of land to Dow from Enron.  The credit is also based on the amount of Salt removed from Enron's new well.  Dow should provide detail on the salt removed and someone would need to go through the calcs in 6.5 through 6.8 to verify the above charges.

3.  Power Credit Adjustment - $16,500

I find no basis for this in the contract.

Under Schedule 3 to the Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. partnership agreement, Bridgline is obligated to bear all obligations under the Dow Agreement up to a maximum of $1,000,000 per year.  So Bridgeline should be paying these costs, assuming they haven't already paid up to $1,000,000.

Let me know if you have any questions.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron on 06/13/2001 02:07 PM ---------------------------

Richard Hanagriff
06/13/2001 01:40 PM
To:	Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	tw imbal


Transco capacity for Feb

k#  MDQ  Comment
3.8129  3800  Z3-Z3
3.7324  10000  Backhaul Z4-Z1, use to serve Mirango

1.8793  n/a  Use to flow Nful Leidy to CNG Leidy, no fuel. we have a rate of
$.01 through March 31.
1.8793  n/a  Can use to flow Ragley to Mamou, no fuel, we have a rate of $.01
for Feb.

For the 1st, we will be serving NYPA from Texas Gas.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000
12:58 PM ---------------------------

Jane S Saladino
08/28/2000 11:49 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Price corrections for 6/00 Production

Darron, I believe you were ask about this last month.  it is still causing a
pricing difference this month too.  Please call me so we can staighten out
the deal or you can call Laura Scott in Canada and argue your point.  This is
on open OA difference and will continue to be until you handle it.

Elizabeth L Hernandez
07/21/2000 04:34 PM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jane S Saladino/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Price corrections for 6/00 Production

I was able to change the first deal in Sitara, but the other pricing request
I did not feel comfortable making any changes.  Would you please look at this
pricing issue for Client Services since they need to get it paid on Monday.

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT on
07/21/2000 04:31 PM ---------------------------

Jane S Saladino
07/21/2000 04:10 PM
To: Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Price corrections for 6/00 Production

Please correct the following deals:

Enron Canada purchase deal # 121397  Was 4.18427 should be 4.10185  This is
due to a Buy/back at Chippawa which reduces our Sithe transport by
$70,191.70   I normally book this manually (with Journal entry) but with SAP,
it needs to be in Unify and this is the only deal I can book it to.  The
Sithe transport is in Canadian dollars and this reduction is in US $.

Also I have the following deals which are scheduled different on our side
that Enron Canada and causes me about a $500 out of balance each month.  We
have netted this with other out of balances in previous months but with SAP,
I can no longer do this. Here is what happens:

ENA Books:  Purchase Deal 290657  for 30,390  MMBTU per day at
Michcon.Citygate.GD.M.I.-.005 = $4,125,442.50
            Sale Deal 290652 for     ( 5,000) MMBTU per day at
Michcon.Citygate.GD.M.I.-.0075=    678,375.00

  Total          $3,447,067.50

Enron Canada Books:

            Sale                  for 20,000 MMBTU per day at
Michcon.Citygate.GD.M.I.-.005=   $2,715,000.00
  Sale                  for  5,390 MMBTU per day at
Michcon.Citygate.GD.M.I.     =      732,501.00

  Total          $3,447,501.00

I don't know why we book a purchase and sale but it messes up the deal in
SAP.  Can we change the ENA sale deal 290652 to posting -.005 and the ENA
purchase deal # 290657 tier it for 25,000 at Posting -.005 and balance at
posting.  Let me know as soon as possible.  I need to pay this AM on Monday.

Thanks, Jane


Raetta,

Per our conversation, I will be taking the following vacation days in August:

Monday, Aug 6
Tuesday, Aug 14
Monday, Aug 20

Larry


On an ISDA I am reviewing, credit has asked that all indebtedness of the
Canadian counterparty to its affiliates be subordinated to us (in this case
ECC).  Does anyone have access to a Canadian form of subordination
agreement?  I imagine that a fairly bare-bones form would suffice.  Thanks --
Bob


Hey Drew,

I'm working on this!!!


Naveen,
your function class a + b(t+c)(-1) corresponds to my beta=1. If we are going ?to use certain class of functions we have to specify the range of parameters?a, b, c, beta, etc. that guarantees us to be able to do out bootstrapping ?procedure for extracting ffvol. That's what  I did  for the function?a+A*(t+B)(-beta) (see my previous e-mail below). I'll try to come up with
parameter ranges for a+b*exp(-cx) as well.

Tanya

Naveen Andrews@ENRON
11/17/2000 04:41 PM
To: Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant
Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: smoothing methodology for extracting forward forward
volatilities

Tanya,
            The exponentials we tried earlier (a+bexp(-cx), etc, fit well but
gave negative numbers in the bootstrapping.
            I tried a + b(t+c)(-1) , a standard power law, and as the ?accompanying graph shows (for the 12 months), the fits are quite good.?            In this case, the ffvols do not become negative (I believe this ?corresponds to your 0 beta).  ?  I would have preferred exp(-t) and variants (can explain owing to ?mean-reverting vols), but the power law might be a practical alternative ?(from an implementation standpoint).?Naveen??? ????Tanya Tamarchenko@ECT?11/17/2000 02:59 PM?To: Naveen Andrews/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON?cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladimir ?Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT ??Subject: Re: smoothing methodology for extracting forward forward ?volatilities  ??Following up on our discussions I implemented one method for creating forward ?forward curve?from implied vol curve. ?I sorted out 12 forward curves from an original forward vol curve, each of 12 ?curves corresponding?to certain month. Then I fitted each of 12 curves with a function:??y=a+A/power(x+b, beta)??I figured out that when beta is from (0, .5) the above function is suitable ?for performing our bootstrapping?routine of deriving ff vols from implied, because:??y(x+t) * y(x+t) * (x+t) - y(x) * y(x) * tx> 0                  for all x, t.??(I have to double check on this again. Also when beta>0.5 there are some ?combinations of parameters a, A, b, beta?for which above equality holds). Even with restriction on beta this class of ?functions represents quite a variety of shapes.??Below you see the example of fitting as well as the example of ff vol curve ?constructed from implied vol curve for NG.??I'll try this for power as well.??Any comments???????????????


The purpose of this survey is to gather information regarding Enron,s current
employee and community services programs.  Your feedback is extremely
important. This survey may take at least 5 minutes.

Experiencing technical problems?  If this link does not automatically launch
the questionnaire:
1.  Launch by copying the link below into your browser, or
2.  If you continue to have technical difficulties, please send an email
message to human resources@enron.com. (Please leave the space between human
and resources).
3.  Please do not forward this link to anyone else, as it is unique for each
respondent.

http://etcsurvey.corp.enron.com/wi/p0537666/i.asp?r=11131&s=FLBXCPXF&l=9


Jon,

Good talking with you this morning.  I have a few clients that would like to contract at the 5.00 level.  Could you price 123 year contracts out of September 01 for me.  Thanks

Gregory Frers
Enron Direct
Sales Manager
Suite 950, Encor Place
645 - 7th. Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 4G8
Ph. : 403-663-2805
Fax : 403-663-2899
Greg.Frers@enron.com <mailto:Greg.Frers@enron.com>


Let me know if you have any questions about  this e-mail. I have some thoughts, but most of these will be addressed now that you are in the office full time.

			ps. You having fun yet?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Kourtney
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:51 PM
To:	Stokley, Chris
Subject:	Concern

Hey Chris,

I hope all is continuing to go as well as can be expected in H-town.

I'm writing with a worry and am not sure the best way to approach it.  The gist of it is that I am worried about the VM group and their reputation on the floor.  I'll give you a couple of examples as to why:  1) Chris Mallory came to me and starting asking me questions about charges that go w/ imports and exports--I briefly answered but told him to talk to VM.  He said he didn't really know who to talk to, who would be able to answer his questions w/out Heather, you or myself back there.  (and he also did not know Jim Reyes' name until he asked me yesterday), 2) Bill came over the Darren today, concerned that he had been charged cong incorrectly b/c when Bill had checked CAISO, the cong prices were all $0.  Not a huge deal that this happened, but Jim needs to be signing off on the Flash ( i don't know if he is or not) and cong charges should always be closely monitored; and I don't think that this is the first day that Bill has been incorrectly charged cong 3) Richter asked me who would be the person in VM that should help Tim Coffing (his new analyst that moved up here) to deal w/ looking at the EES wholesale settlements.  Jeff didn't know who would be the best b/c he doesn't really know the VM team anymore.  (I suggested Kit b/c he seems to be good at digging into problems and getting answers).

Essentially, I think that the traders do not know all of the new faces, what they are doing and who they should be talking to.  You were always very concerned about the visibility/availability of the VM team as well as the credibility and I think these are suffering right now.  And of course on top of all of this is VMS.

Do you think I should send this to Scotty? Murray?  Without any management being here, I think it is tough to keep a heartbeat on the feeling of the traders and I think that is part of the problem.  And I assume things will improve w/ Scotty here, but he needs to build relationships on the floor as well.

I am not trying to be critical of anyone or step on any toes, but I am concerned.

Please let me know what you think...thanks and sorry to add a little more to your plate of concerns... KN


Please be advised that I will be on vacation starting Monday, May 21st-- May
25th.  In my absence, Gus Perez will distribute the California articles.


Dear Officers,

Attached is the report filed with the Commission regarding version 1.4 of the
standards.  The report is in .pdf format and is bookmarked for easy
navigation.  It is 238 pages in length.   A paper copy will follow shortly in
the mail.  Best Regards,  Rae

cc:  Jay Costan and Laurie Paulson


Eric,  Plan on attending this with me.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2001 10:01 AM -----

	Steve Van Hooser
	01/16/2001 08:42 AM

		 To: Gerald Nemec
		 cc:
		 Subject: Black Marlin UA4

Gerald,

Would you please, or would you please task Eric to deal with this.  I'll
forward you a voicemail that I received on this Friday afternoon or over the
weekend.

Thanks,

Steve
----- Forwarded by Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 08:40 AM -----

	Mary Comello@ENRON
	01/16/2001 08:23 AM

		 To: Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL
Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Monica Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Black Marlin UA4

Per the request of Sherlyn Schumack, Please plan to attend the following
meeting:

Topic: Black Marlin UA4
Date: Thursday, Jan. 18
Time: 4-5 PM
Place: EB37c1

Thanks,
Mary Comello   x35999


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/25/2001
07:45 AM ---------------------------

eserver@enron.com on 04/16/2001 10:53:15 AM
To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - 041601LC

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Lisa Connolly
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: 041601LC
Report Total: $280.03
Amount Due Employee: $280.03

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Sure family walk - I get the message (finally) I will communicate with you
via E-Mail.  (Smiling)
I really dont know about my MOM's -  I am kinda playing around with the Idea
of  hiring chef Wes and trasting them "special' ??
I dont know - what ideas do you have?


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/25/2001 11:01 AM -----

	"US Publishing" <brice@restructuringtoday.com>
	06/24/2001 10:00 PM
	Please respond to brice

		 To: "RT Reader" <brice@restructuringtoday.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Restructuring Today Monday June 25 2001

(see attached file:  rt010625.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
800-486-8201
202-298-8201
 - rt010625.pdf


Friday, March 10 works for my group.

Sally - Can we make sure all other groups can be done by Friday as well?  We
really need to get this completed and I don't want to see Operations being a
bottleneck in this process.

Kim Melodick
03/07/2000 05:24 PM
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen P
Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvonne
Laing/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOPS salary survey questionnaire

We will need to establish a deadline.  Will Friday March 10th work?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2000 05:14
PM ---------------------------

Kim Melodick
02/18/2000 05:34 PM
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen P
Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvonne
Laing/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOPS salary survey questionnaire

Attached you will find the salary survey questionnaire for your review.  You
will need to fill out the questionnaire for each exempt job group in your
department.  Please be as specific as possible to ensure we are capturing all
the skills needed to accurately price the job.  If you have filled out the
questionnaire in the past, you may want to update the information.  I will be
happy to address any questions you have regarding the form.


John:
?
Thanks again for the opportunity to provide my technical  service.? Attached
is an agreement that covers our arrangement.? Let  me know if you have any
questions.? If it's ok, please sign and fax back to  me at (410)308-0441.? I
look forward to working with you.?
?
Mark Sagel
Psytech Analytics
(410)308-0245
 - Agree-Enron.doc


Hi  Sally -

Here is the IP Address you requested, to be used with your AirCard(s).

Sally Beck -   EID# 00-A0-D5-01-33-45     IP Address: 166.149.3.64

**A Change control request was submitted today, cards should be active by
tomorrow afternoon.

Thank You !

Albernita Travis
Enron - I.T. Sourcing & Procurement
(713) 345-6255


On or about 5/2/01we opened the above counterparty to transact Canadian/US
Currency Swaps on EnronOnline (which they cannot transact under the old
Master Energy Price Swap Agreement, they would have to transact udner the
GTC).  After discussing this counterparty w/Sara Shackleton, an attorney in
the swap group, it appears that Sara has been talking to Morgan Stanley and
Morgan Stanley does all its interest rate & currency business out of Morgan
Stanley Capital Services, Inc.  We can keep Morgan Stanley Capital Group open
for currency swaps, but if they don't trade currency swaps out of that
company we'll know why.  Sara is already working on an ISDA Master for
Capital Services for Gary Hickerson's group.


-----Original Message-----
From: The Power Marketing Association
[mailto:pma-marketplace@mgfairfax.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:33 PM
Subject: Enron's Secrets Revealed!

How has Enron managed to achieve such success while other energy firms have struggled to deal with the changing market landscape?

Global Change Associates is pleased to announce the publication of a new corporate profile entitled, "Enron 2001: An Inside View". This objective study takes an insider?s look at Enron, specifically, how the firm operates and the keys to its success. Much of the information provided comes from first hand accounts and covers areas such as:

? The firm?s structure and operations
? The recruitment and training of new employees
? How Enron empowers and compensates its employees
? The keys to structuring Enron type "risk free" transactions
? How to negotiate with Enron
? Why Enron occasionally forgives counterparty obligations
? Is the Enron model right for your organization?

Enron 2001: An Inside View is a unique publication. It provides valuable insight into the firm?s operations and analyzes its successes and failures. For those firms dealing directly with Enron, or thinking about adopting some of Enron?s business practices, it is an invaluable, must have tool.

This innovative study is available for purchase at $995.00.

For a detailed Table of Contents and Executive Summary please download:

http://www.pmaconference.com/Enron2001.pdf
To be removed from this distribution list, please reply with the word REMOVE in the subject line.


Dan,

 The two deals mentioned below are deal #s 97154 & 97077 under contract
96022216.  Entex has already paid this invoice in full.  Let me know if there
is anything needed on my end to get these deals corrected, if needed.

Thanks,
Kyle

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Dan J Hyvl                           08/30/99 03:21 PM

To: Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Entex Gas Marketing

Kyle,
 All of the sales to Reliant Energy Entex and/or Entex Gas Marketing Company
should be made by Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.  Please identify the
two deals that you have under HPL so that we can get them documented under
the proper ECT agreement.

Kyle R Lilly
08/30/99 02:45 PM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Entex Gas Marketing

Dan,

 Why is it that all sells to Reliant Energy - Entex are billed under ECT &
not HPLC?  I have two spot deals billed to Entex Gas Marketing under HPLC.
Should these two deals been billed under ECT or is it ok to have a billing to
Entex Gas Marketing under HPLC?  Could you let me know.

Thanks,
Kyle


We will have activities on Thursday, April 26 for Bring Your Kid to Work
Day.  Please RSVP to
Theresa Villeggiante via email by 5:00 PM on Tuesday, April 23 with your
guest(s) name and age.

The schedule:

8:00 - 9:00 Breakfast Served in Mt. Hood and with parents
9:00 - 9:45 What we do on the Trading Floor Presentation in Mt Hood
10:00 - 10:30  Join PGE Group for Fun On The Plaza (2WTC, Open Area) Electric
Cars, Line Truck Demo, etc.
10:30 - 11:00 Join PGE Group for tours (tour executive floor, load dispatch,
sign up at 10:00 on the plaza)
11:00 - 11:30 with parents
11:30 - 12:15 Lunch served (sandwiches, chips, cookies)
12:30 - 1:00  IMAGO Theatre's delightful FROGZ show w/PGE Group,
2WTC-Auditorium (suitable for all ages)
Remainder of the afternoon with parents.

Please note, parents must attend PGE activities with their child(ren).

Let me know if you have any questions and remember to RSVP on Tuesday!

Thanks.

Mollie


---------------------- Forwarded by Laura Vuittonet/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001
12:26 PM ---------------------------
From: Julie Pechersky/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/28/2001 11:07 AM
To: Laura Vuittonet/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Sonya Johnson/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: FW: Report for Tom Martin - Tx Desk

Let me know if you have any questions, or see any changes that need to be
made.

Thanks,
Julie

Nothing under 0413/105633
Nothing under 0413/105984

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Vuittonet, Laura
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 10:12 AM
To: Julie Pechersky/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Report for Tom Martin - Tx Desk

Hi, Julie.  I really appreciate you getting this information for me.  The
company/cost centers that I need the information for are as follows:

0012/106012
0012/105978
0413/105633
0012/105982
0413/105984
0012/105977

The reason we need this information is because there are some people who are
Houston Pipe Line employees, and we want to ensure that they have or do not
have the applications they are required or not required to have.  Tom Martin
is over the Texas Desk, and he is the person who would like this
information.

Thanks again!
Laura Vuittonet
x31994


Market Participants:

Please assure that this Notification is forwarded to your respective
Operating Departments ---

Notification of Operating Procedure Update

* The following new or revised ISO Operating Procedures have been
implemented and are posted for reference on the ISO Website.

ISO Operating Procedures posted:  E-501 Power System Restoration Procedure
     E-502 Manual Load Shedding Procedure
     E-503 Under-Frequency Load Shedding
Procedure
     E-508 Electrical Emergency
Plan-NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE (with attachment A)
Effective Dates: 1-1-2001
Changes / Reasons: Current Year Ratios

* Please find them at
http://www1.caiso.com/thegrid/operations/opsdoc/index.html under the
appropriate Operating Procedure section heading.

If you have any questions, please e-mail the 'Procedure Control Desk'
mailbox [mailto:procctrldesk@caiso.com] and we will respond as soon as
possible.

Thank-You,

Operations Support and Training


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000 03:02
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jared Kaiser                           10/26/2000 04:19 PM

To: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

---------------------- Forwarded by Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 04:19
PM ---------------------------

Joe A Casas
10/26/2000 04:12 PM
To: Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen@CCMAIL
cc:
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

---------------------- Forwarded by Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 04:11
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           10/26/2000 03:40 PM

To: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sabra L Dinari/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy
Vachuska/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alvin
Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert E
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Christina Sanchez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

While we wait for Unify to work.....here's a funny!!!!

 - Evilke~1.mpe


I've taken the liberty of drafting a form of extension letter to extend the ILA until June 15.

I suspect Reagan will be distributing to the commercial folks, but I thought I would give you a heads up.

David, I'm at work on revising the longer term doc.  If you have your preamble stuff ready, I'm happy to put it in now.

Thanks,

Kay

PS  The salutation is to "Gentlemen".  Are the members of the commission and MDEA all men?  I don't want to commit a blunder.


===================================
Lucy Marshall
Executive Assistant to Jim Fallon
Office of the Chairman
Enron Broadband Services
Office 713-853-4525
Fax    713-345-7864
Cell    713-417-7802
lucy.marshall@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pearce, Barry
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Marshall, Lucy; Fallon, Jim
Subject:	Latest


woops - i'm on a 4:45pm EST call so it'll probably be around 2:15 or 2:30
your time.  thanks.

lara

Jeff Dasovich
09/05/2000 02:31 PM
To: Lara Leibman/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Please forward to the group

Here it is.  And I have JUST been informed that I have to be on a conference
call tomorrow from 1-2.  Could we do our call at noon or 2 pm California
time?  Sorry for the inconvenience.

Best,
Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 09/05/2000 02:30
PM ---------------------------

Tracy Cooper@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
09/01/2000 05:56 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Please forward to the group

Rich and Jeff -- I apologize -- I left you off the original distribution that
I sent about an hour and a half ago --

Thanks!

Tracy J. Cooper
Please note my name has changed from McLaughlin to Cooper
Enron Broadband Services
Government Affairs
(503) 886-0396

----- Forwarded by Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications on 09/01/00 04:00 PM
-----

	Scott Bolton
	09/01/00 11:03 AM

		 To: Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Please forward to the group

call me first  thanks


Jim

You were right. SPP is going to use this episode as a lever to be "promoted" to an RTO.

Texas is recommending three steps to introduce competition at Texas-SPP. One is described as follows:

*	Support the SPP's efforts to begin wholesale market operations: Mr. Brown, Vice President of SPP, testified that SPP can begin wholesale market operations and complete systems testing by April 1, 2002. He has requested that the SPP Board approve his recommendation to start to wholesale market operations. This Commission should support that process by:

-	Requesting in writing that the SPP Board begin wholesale operations as soon as possible with a target date of completing systems testing by April 1, 2002.
-	Advising FERC of the need to support SPP wholesale market operations. While Mr. Brown testified that the recent July and September Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) orders regarding SPP's start up expenditures will not impede SPP from implementing wholesale market operations, this Commission should advise FERC that the findings from our hearing show the need for FERC to fully support SPP wholesale operations startup.


You'll also be even more proud to know the outcome of the following text that
I sent to one of my Mexico clients -- "Matthew, with all due respect, clients
will be doing business with Enron as it is indentified in the introductory
paragraph and the signature block.  Indeed, as a side note, most of  the
documents that I have drafted or reviewed always use some form of acronym for
subsequent references to Enron.  I am indifferent, but I know that the reason
our accounting brethen made that comment, as well as the other comments they
often make that seem counter-intuitive, is that it facilitates their efforts
in ensuring that documents reflect off-balance sheet, soft costs related
rather than on-balance sheet, hard costs.  As such, I would defer to them on
this issue"  which was in response to "Carlos, with all due respect to our
Accounting brethren, from a commercial point of view, potential clients don't
want to do business with EDM, they want to do business with Enron.  So,
please switch the EDM thing back to Enron and everything will be fine."
Anyway, I think Herman must have forwarded  copy of those emails to Lisa who
shared it with Joe Deffner and I happened to run into them outside just now
and they were both congratulating me for my "toughness".

By separate email, I'll forward you a redlined form of interconnect agreement
that we can subsequently discuss.

	Kay Mann
	05/29/2001 11:54 AM

		 To: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement

Could you email me the list of issues you have encountered thus far.  Ben
really wants me to check with you. (I'm so proud!!)

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/29/2001 11:53
AM ---------------------------
From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/29/2001 10:42 AM
To: Fred Mitro/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement

Fred / Kay:

I spoke to Duran this morning, and he and I would like to meet together with
us to discuss the Midway project and whether or not we will be able to
utilize TurboPark Phase 2. I previously told him that because of timing
considerations and because there may be certain agreements that will be
difficult to make TurboPark compliant (such as the attached interconnect
agreement from FPL), that Phase 2 may not be practical for purposes of this
project.

I think this would be a good discussion to have on Friday, because we should
have more information on the GE7FAs and should have already spoken with TECO
on their proposed MOU (and maybe even the tolling agreement). What are your
schedules on Friday?

I also would like to schedule a call for tomorrow with TECO to go over the
MOU. Fred - Please coordinate with Kay and schedule something with Becky
Alex. I would prefer the afternoon if that's OK with you guys, and would like
45 min. before the call for us to meet seperately. Also Fred, please advise
on the status of the tolling agreement.

Kay - attached is FPL's standard form interconnect agreement. I was thinking
that Carlos would be a good choice to review it as he is currently working
with accounting / finance on an Ameren interconnect, so he will already be
familiar with the likely issues. Please let me know what you think. It will
be important to give Duran a summary of likely accounting / finance issues
related to this agreement on Friday.

Hope you both had good weekends.

Regards,

Ben
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Krause
Sent: Mon 5/21/2001 9:00 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay
Cc: Ben Jacoby
Subject: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement

Please see attached for your review and comments.

 <<FPL Construction & Connection Agreement Generic.doc>>


Attached is PIRA's latest "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast."

If you have any questions regarding the report's content, please contact
Morris Greenberg (email: morris@pira.com) or Victoria Watkins (email:
vwatkins@pira.com), at (212) 686-6808.

Contact John Graziano regarding PIRA report distribution and address changes
at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com.

NOTE: Circulation of the "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast" outside a
Client's licensed distribution area is strictly prohibited. Clients that are
unsure of their licensed distribution or require an extension of their
current license should contact their PIRA sales representative, or email to
sales@pira.com.

PIRA Energy Group

 - ed050801.pdf
 - ed050801.xls


Vince,
I'll send him one of the manuals, and perhaps a paper on SDDP.

Tom

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
07/28/2000 10:53 AM
To: Tom Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: SDDP

Tom,

Can you send the info regarding SDDP to John?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/28/2000
10:52 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
07/19/2000 06:41 PM
To: "O'Brien John" <jobrien@snowyhydro.com.au> @ ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: SDDP

John,

I shall E-mail the information about SDDP  from Houston.

Vince

"O'Brien John" <jobrien@snowyhydro.com.au> on 07/18/2000 01:47:41 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: SDDP

Vincent,

You kindly suggested that I email you with regard to some information you
have on the SDDP system (I'm not sure if I've got the abbreviation correct,
but it's something that is currently used in South America).

Your presentation was very interesting and informative.

Kind regards,

John O'Brien
Manager, Treasury & Risk Management
Snowy Hydro Trading Pty Ltd
Level 17, Bligh House
4 Bligh Street
Sydney NSW 2000


Thanks Sally.  It is great having Brent over here and I appreciate you
stretching the North American operation to facilitate his
being here now.  Look forward to speaking with you soon!

John

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           09/05/2000 23:41

To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Added Role

Congratulations on your added role of CEO for Enron Europe.  I look forward
to continuing to work with you and the staff in London on risk management
operations initiatives.

I talk with Brent Price several times a week.  I know that Fernley has
appreciated his participation in London, and I hope that you have found his
involvement to be beneficial as well.  We are almost at the half way mark on
his assignment, so I will talk with you next week when I return from Calgary
to get your input on his role to date.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Glover, Sheila
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:03 PM
To:	Lowry, Donna; Shackleton, Sara; Bradford, William S.; Schultz, Cassandra
Cc:	Charania, Aneela; Hickerson, Gary
Subject:	ISI (International Strategy & Investement Group) Executing Broker Agreement

We are requesting an Executing Broker Agreement be put in place with ISI.  We are using for regional research coverage and order flow.

ISI utilizes Bear Stearns for clearing services.  We are requesting for ECT Investments Inc. and will name GS, MSDW and BS as our clearing brokers.

Regards, Sheila


here is the final

Jim


Don't worry there's no rush.  Take your time and exhaust all your other
options...don't worry it doesn't hurt my feelings that you are trying
desparately to get out of spending the holidays with me.  Just kidding.

Have a good weekend.
Robin


Sorry - I meant to send the file.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barkowsky, Gloria G.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 5:04 PM
To:	Staab, Theresa
Subject:	RE: Crestone Imbalance

Theresa - Can we get a list of the other counterparties with deliveries in 02/01?  Our imbalance is out
because of deliveries, but Enron's looks ok, so I can't cut there, but I need to know  who to cut.
Also, has Scott gone back and looked at these cumulative imbalances that they are showing?
We have a huge plug to come back to his (3,395) for prior to 2001.  Let me know.  Also, can
you send over 07/01?  Thanks, Gloria

Sorry - I meant to send the file.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Staab, Theresa
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:28 PM
To:	Barkowsky, Gloria G.
Subject:	RE: Crestone Imbalance

I'm sending the invoice/statement via e-mail.  Let me know if you can't open it.  The Crestone OBA Imbalance is the summary we started on showing the discrepancies on the receipt side.  A lot of it is rounding from the Crestone spreadsheets to our "whole" numbers we put into the Unify system.  The other Imbalance report is on the 3rd tab of the Enron Statement report.  Let me know if you have any questions.

 << File: Crestone OBA Balance.xls >>  << File: Enron Statement Aug.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barkowsky, Gloria G.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 3:17 PM
To:	Staab, Theresa
Subject:	RE: Crestone Imbalance

That sounds great!  Can you fax the 08/01 invoices to me at 713-646-8420?
Thanks, Gloria

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Staab, Theresa
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:11 PM
To:	Barkowsky, Gloria G.
Subject:	RE: Crestone Imbalance

Gloria,
Thanks for the heads up on  9/01.  I'm printing the report right now and I'll get with Amy tomorrow (she's out today).  If you would like to look at August that would be fine - I would just like to stress that changing any receipts will affect our purchases and likewise with our deliveries.  If you could define the differences first then maybe I can lead you to where the issues are.  How does that sound?

I also think by doing this it will get you familiar with this pipeline and maybe in the future you could take this part over.  It's just very confusing at first.

Let me know ,
Theresa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barkowsky, Gloria G.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 2:56 PM
To:	Staab, Theresa; Felling, Amy
Cc:	Schumack, Sherlyn
Subject:	RE: Crestone Imbalance

There is an interconnect between WIC and FUGG for 09/01.  The WIC # ties to the
statement.  Can you please check the FUGG # ?
Right now, I have some extra time.  I would love to help you guys with this imbalance.
Could I take a look at 08/01?  Please let me know.  Thanks, Gloria

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Staab, Theresa
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:46 PM
To:	Barkowsky, Gloria G.
Subject:	RE: Crestone Imbalance

Gloria,
Amy Felling here is working on current month and I'll continue on prior month variances.  We'll let you know the status of current month by tomorrow afternoon.

Thanks,
Theresa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barkowsky, Gloria G.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:56 AM
To:	Staab, Theresa
Subject:	Crestone Imbalance

 << File: Crestone.xls >>

Theresa - here's the latest by month of the imbalance.  Please let me know if
there is any way that I can help you.  Could I look at current month, while you
look at the past stuff?  Please let me know.  Thanks, Gloria


---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/05/2000
11:39 AM ---------------------------
From: Suzanne Adams on 05/04/2000 11:43 AM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Sick Leave

Carol, from the way this sounds, your four weeks goes on into the 26 weeks as
long as your doctor hasn't released you.  What do you think.  Man, this stuff
is hard to decifer!
----- Forwarded by Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000 11:42 AM -----

	Carmen Chavira
	05/03/2000 01:37 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Sick Leave

Under doctors care, the employee is paid 4 wks at 100% of their base, granted
that no sick time has been taken prior to the maternity leave.  If the doctor
requires her to be off work before her due date, this time would be coded as
sick.  Even after delivery and still under doctors care you would code her
sick time.  until the doctor releases her to return to work.  Once she has
been released by the doctor Carol has the option to take time off using any
vacation available or could take FMLA leave (if  she qualifies )  with
supervisor approval.

carmen

Suzanne Adams
04/27/2000 10:08 AM
To: Carmen Chavira/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Sick Leave

Carmen, I understand that Carol will get her 4 weeks sick pay for having the
baby and then whatever vacation she wants to take, but what does the doctor
need to do to extend her into the 26 weeks of 90% pay.  She's already
starting to have problems, so I'm sure she's not going to be able to return
to work after 4 weeks.  I need details on how to address this issue.  Thanks,
Suzanne


Rumor has it you went and got engaged....I'm so excited for you and Brendan....

I'm going to have to give you a call sometime so I can hear all of the details.

Still want to come and visit if I can....

Love,
Susan


Dasovich this is in your court.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryall, Jean
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 11:46 PM
To: Steffes, James D.
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Do you know Laura Doll?

Yes, I have known her for quite some time.  She is the one who recommended me to Korn Ferry for the job that I have at Enron.  I will be happy to make the introduction.  Shall I make arrangements for a meeting in Pebble Beach???

I'll give her a call when you say the word...Jean

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Sun 10/7/2001 9:48 AM
To: Ryall, Jean
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: Do you know Laura Doll?

Jean --

Laura Doll has been appointed head of the CA Power Authority.  Do you know her?  It would be good to have an introduction for Jeff Dasovich.

Jim


The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by:  System
Expense Report Name: Mary S. Fischer
Report Total: $96.52
Amount Due Employee: $96.52
Amount Approved: $96.52
Amount Paid: $0.00
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: Processed

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Lynn Aven and I are in the process of finalizing a memo on the Argentina trip
and we will also have a separate list of "action points" for Mike G.  I am
not planning to do anything further with respect to Argentina per your
instructions (eg, there is an ADA conference in June and we have been asked
to provide a speaker; we have been asked to comment on the ADA local master
format; finalizine trader guidelines and termsheet format).  Also, I am not
planning to do anything further with respect to Brazil other than finalize
our financial trading matrix.  I have cancelled my trip to Sao Paulo at the
end of March and will table the "derivatives training" indefinitelly.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000
08:41 AM ---------------------------

Brent Hendry@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/12/2000 10:28 PM
To: Michael Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark E
Haedicke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Taylor@ECT
cc: Andrea Calo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara
Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: ADA Derivatives conference

There is a half day Argentine Derivatives Association conference scheduled
for the afternoon of March 22 here in downtown Buenos Aires.  The topic will
be primarily regarding credit derivatives.  I am planning on having Andrea
attend and, if possible, I am planning on attending as well.  I think it is
important that we begin to get involved in ADA activities even if we cannot
currently transact in the nascent local derivatives market.  The cost will be
$250 per person.

Mark, I believe Sara has a copy of the ADA brochure if you are interested in
getting more information regarding the association.

Regards,
Brent


Notice to Members No.  01-312
September 24, 2001

TO:		All NYMEX Division Members
		All NYMEX Commodity Managers
		All NYMEX Clearing Members

FROM:	J. Robert Collins, Jr., President

RE:		Posting of All NYMEX Division EFPs

Posting of all EFPs for all NYMEX Division futures contracts, as required by
NYMEX Division Rule 6.21(B) will be extended until 4:30 P.M. until otherwise
notified.

Any questions can be directed to Thomas LaSala, Vice President, Compliance,
at (212) 299-2897.


We are approaching the final countdown as to signing our definitive agreement
with El Paso regarding the sale of JEDI II's 51% interest in East Coast Power
and ENA's $157.9mm of ECP Subordinated Notes.

The transaction has continued to develop along the lines of my last update of
11-21-00.  The terms and economics remain essentially as outlined on
11-21-00.  In summary, the primary form of consideration will be a
derivative-like commodity agreement or a 'contract for differences'.  This
contract will be exchanged in full for the SubNotes and the majority of our
equity interest.  The JEDI II equity interest will also receive a residual
contingent interest which will become payable in the event of a PPA
restructuring at the Linden facility.  We are calling the derivative a swap
but it is more like a receivable.  An El Paso affiliate (guaranteed by El
Paso as parent) will notionally be paying NYMEX plus approx $0.52
(escalating) over seven years on a notional volume of 300,000 MMBtu/d and
receiving NYMEX.  With netting the contract is simply a series of fixed
quarterly payments over seven years.  No offset rights and no limitations on
the guarantee - fully a stand alone agreement.

We are optimistic that we may be able to sign documents as early as Thursday
night.  This agreement can be terminated at our option in the event that we
do not receive the necessary internal approvals.  There are only two
significant external approvals required, a NJ Environmental
'non-applicability' determination and ECP credit ratings reaffirmation.
Accordingly we expect at this time to receive the necessary internal and
external approvals and close by year end.  We expect that a public
announcement would be appropriate at the time both parties have received all
necessary internal approvals.

The portion of the commodity contract being exchanged for the SubNotes is
expected to be offered to Condor to monetize this portion of the contract at
year end.  Subsequent to Condor's acquisition of its contract, both JEDI II's
contract and the Condor contract are expected to be monetized in a QSPE
vehicle later in the first quarter.

Please call or email with any questions you may have.  Thanks for your
assistance in these matters.


Jesse Wants his CD back or the penalty will be Death!


Dear Advanced Seminar Speakers:
We  presume that:
1)	You will be attending and speaking at the Law Conference.
2)	You have connected with your co-speaker and have prepared your
program.
3)	If you didn't submit your program materials to ICSC for inclusion in
the course book, that you plan on bringing at least 40  	copies with
you to hand-out at your program.

If any of the foregoing are not accurate, 	PLEASE CONTACT ME OR RON
GERN IMMEDIATELY !!!
We hope you are weathering these difficult times and that everything in your
life is under control... and we look forward to seeing you next week in
sunny Palm Desert !!

Best regards,

Richard S. Friedman
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
350 South Grand Ave., 36th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Ph:  (213) 613-2836
Fax: (213) 613-2950
Email: friedman@hugheshubbard.com

**********************************************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential
information.  Use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this message by anyone
other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error please notify the sender by reply email and destroy all copies
of this message in your possession, custody or control.

***********************************************************************************************


no -- it was at a resturant! Not sure where

	From:  Dana Davis @ ECT                           02/08/2001 02:56 PM

To: Susan Rance/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:

Was it in the big conference room right around the corner from us, today?


Here's the latest...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/24/2001 09:28
AM ---------------------------

Ron Tapscott@ECT
01/24/2001 07:56 AM
To: Matthew Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@Enron_Development
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: new version of letter to Lynn Dekrey (SW) on 501d5a

Matt,

I have attached a letter we plan to send today (or, tomorrow at the latest)
and require copies of letter's from SW that Dan Schultz references in his
Nov. 10th letter.  In addition, there is another matter regarding other
correspondence we need to have in hand that other letters reference.  Most
notably, a reference to a request from Scott Laidlaw (dated January 12, 2001)
noted in Lynn DeKrey's letter on January 18, 2001.

Absence of this correspondence jeapordizes our claim!  We need to close the
loop on this information so we know our response is appropriate.

Kay -- the attached letter is a newer version from the one you received
yesterday.  I would appreciate any input you may have.

Thanks, Ron.


-----Original Message-----
From:?? Dotty Hopkins [SMTP:dottyhop@napanet.net]
Sent:?? Sunday, October 29, 2000 8:42 AM
To:???? Angela & Dan Masluk
Cc:???? Nancy Sellers
Subject:??????? Fw: Grizzly Bear Attack

> >
> >?? > Grizzly Bear Attack
> >?? >
> >?? >An atheist was taking a walk through the woods, admiring all that
> > the
> >?? >"accident of evolution" had created.? "What majestic trees!? What
> > powerful
> >?? >rivers!? What beautiful animals!" he said to himself.? As he walked
> >?? >alongside the river, he heard a rustling in the bushes behind him.
> > As he
> >?? >turned to look, he saw a 7 foot grizzly charge towards him.
> >?? >He ran as fast as he could up the path.? He looked over his
> > shoulder & saw
> >?? >the bear closing in on him.? He tried to run even faster, so scared
> > that
> >?? >tears were coming to his eyes.? He looked over his shoulder again,
> > and the
> >?? >bear was even closer.? His heart was jumping frantically as he
> > tried to run
> >?? >even faster, but he tripped and fell on the ground.? He rolled over
> > to pick
> >?? >himself up and saw the bear right on top of him raising his paw to
> > kill him.
> >?? >At that instant he cried out "Oh my God!"? Just then, time
> > stopped... The
> >?? >bear froze; the forest was silent; the river even stopped moving. A
> > bright
> >?? >light shone upon the man, and a voice came out of the sky saying...
> > "You
> >?? >deny my existence all of these years; teach others I don't exist;
> > even
> >?? >credit my creation to a cosmic accident, and now do you expect me
> > to help
> >?? >you out of this predicament?"? Am I to count you as a believer?"
> >?? >The atheist, ever so proud, looked into the light and said... "It
> > would be
> >?? >rather hypocritical to ask to be a Christian after all these years,
> > but
> >?? >could you make the bear a Christian?"
> >?? >"Very well," said the voice.?? As the light went out, the river
> > ran, and the
> >?? >sounds of the forest continued, the bear put his paw down.? The
> > bear then
> >?? >brought both paws together... bowed his head and said...? "Lord, I
> > thank you
> >?? >for this food, which I am about to receive."
> >?? >
>
>
>


I understand that contract 63304 is the retail FSS contract with a total
capacity of 7,503,838.  I bill CES Retail for the demand charges on this.
What is FSS contract 51407?


All,

Thank you all for supplying details on your Trading Track rotation earlier.  I would however like for you to provide me with details of your previous rotations within the A&A program at Enron in the following format:

1.	Rotation (i.e. S/E Fundamentals)
2.	Business Unit (ENA/EGM etc)
3.	Duration (Month/year)
4.	Supervisor

I would be greatful if you could provide this as soon as possible.

Kind regards,

Karen.
x54667


Wellhead volumes have been adjusted to the Avg column on the attached
spreadsheet as of 3/8/01 forward.

Bob


HOLIDAY SAFETY REMINDER

The holiday season can mean an increased risk of fires and a higher potential
for criminal activity due to people taking advantage of convenient downtown
shopping and because of the increased number of special events and office
parties.  We would like to pass along a few safety and security tips from the
City of Houston Fire Department and the Houston Police Department.

? Please do not prop open stairwell doors or doors to the freight elevators.
This defeats security.

? Use only artificial trees and greenery in decorating your office space. Do
not place cut trees or greenery within the building. Cut trees become major
fire hazards when they dry out.

? Office parties or the holiday mood may distract you.  Be alert for thieves
who try to take advantage of the holiday season. Sometimes just having fewer
people at work during the holidays creates an opening for thieves. If you see
someone that does not appear to belong in your work area, immediately call
the Enron Security Console at 713-853-5360.

? Keep your purse or wallet with you at all times or locked away in a drawer
or closet.

? If you go shopping, invite a friend to go along. Try not to overload
yourself with packages.  When you return, lock your gifts away in a safe
place.

? Always be aware of your surroundings while in a public area. If things don,
t look right, follow your instincts and avoid going into the area.

? When waiting for a ride home after hours, remain inside the building near a
card-reader door until you see your ride arrive.

? If office parties are on company premises and involve alcoholic beverages
or public invitees, call security at 713-853-5360.  Security will advise you
as to company guidelines.


Hey there! Congrats with Scott William. I hope all is going well. Fifteen days and counting till our third arrival. I've attached the DASH that documented the divestiture. The quick summary of the economics per Heather Kroll are as follows:

Original Basis of $8mm.
Signed the Purchase and Sale Agreement on May 16 for $22mm (gain of $14mm)

Sold put for $3.5mm with $1.7mm granted to origination. I don't know for sure what the desk booked.
The coal supply contract resulted in $5mm mark to market to EGM.

The FERC 203 filing has been made regarding market power. They are not expecting any issues with FERC or the North Carolina commission and expect final approval by the beginning of July.

Net gain of about $21mm on transaction.

Chris Lee, the managing partner of Highstar, has requested the opportunity to take you and I out to dinner sometime after you've returned and settled back in to discuss the merits of Enron's investment in Highstar. If that's of interest let me know and I can schedule some time.

Once again, congratulations. Do you have an expected return date yet?
Joe

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoppe, Tammie
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 4:18 PM
To:	Deffner, Joseph
Subject:	Report for Louise

Hi Joe,

Louise would like you to send her an update on AIG Highstar via email.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Tammie
x34220


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000 08:47 AM -----

	Scott Wright <scott@scottpaul.com>
	10/29/2000 07:06 PM

		 To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Your ScottPaul.com order confirmation

Dear Sara -

I think we've found a way to ship to you in TX - would you rather do that? If
so, just send me back your TX shipping address -

Thanks!

Scott

sara.shackleton@enron.com wrote:

> Thank you for your order with Scott Paul Wines!
>
> Please keep this email for your records.
>
> PRODUCT NAME, PRICE, QTY, SUBTOTAL
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> 1999 Pisoni Vineyard Pinot Noir,  $38.00,  12,  $456.00
>
>   Sub-Total:  $456.00
>                Tax:  $22.80
>      Shipping:  $53.92
> Grand Total:  $532.72
>
> Your shipping information is as follows:
>
>         Email:  sara.shackleton@enron.com
>         Name:  Michael McKeogh
> Address 1:  601 Poydras Street
> Address 2:  Suite 2421
>            City:  New Orleans
>          State:  Louisiana
>              Zip:  70130
>
> Our wines are on a first-come, first-served basis, so kindly mail your
check promptly.  We may be unable to fulfill your order if payment is not
received by November 10th.  Also include with your check a copy of this
email, or the printout when you ordered your wine online.
>
> The 1999 Chardonnay is scheduled to ship the week of November 13th, 2000.
>
> The 1999 Pinot Noir - Pisoni Vineyard is scheduled to ship in late March,
2001.
>
> Please note that shipping dates may be subject to change, should we
encounter extreme weather conditions that may adversely affect the wines.
>
> If you have any questions, please contact us via email
(martha@scottpaul.com) or call us direct at 707-944-1188.
>
> Thank you again.
>
> Martha and Scott Wright
> Proprietors
> Scott Paul Wines, LLC


Why did he call "angry" in the first instance? I thought that there was no rush on Con Ed -- or at least not a rush as in other deals I am working on where (1) the counterparty's attorney is leaving her company or (2) the counterparty's attorney is going on jury duty or (3) the counterparty is already in default?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Tuesday, June 19, 2001 4:18 PM
To:	Scheuer, Janelle; Sacks, Edward; Nelson, Cheryl
Subject:	Consolidated Edison

A very angry George Diskin called about ENA's failure to respond to CP's form of Schedule.  He never asked credit for numbers.  Rather than ocntinue to anger this gentleman, I will create blackline myself.
Click on this link to view the document in the Financial Trading Agreements database--> << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>


I haven't specifically referenced NuTech in my questions to them.  I also probably need to ask the comp committee about these "tolerable" conflicts of interest, particularly in light of recent press coverage of Enron.  We'll discuss that this afternoon, Nancy, but I am not feeling like we should agree to any of those types of provisions.  Yikes!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bushman, Teresa G.
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 10:41 AM
To:	Corbet, Nancy; Cash, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Board compensation approval NuTech

The following is the email I sent Aaron last week.  I called him this morning to confirm if this was accurate.  He's meeting later today with Mary Joyce and said he'll get back to me.  I did not inquire specifically about NuTech--I assume Michelle is doing that.

Teresa

Aaron:

Based on our conversations, it is my understanding that the compensation committee has asked to review compensation plans for our affiliates if we own approximately 50% or more of the company.  The determination of exactly which plans must go to the committee will be made by Mary Joyce upon receipt of a bullet point presentation of the key terms of the plan.  The committee would likely review any compensation plan pursuant to which (i) employees receive equity interests without making capital contributions in cash or other property with reasonably equivalent value to the equity interests, (ii) employees receive equity interests prior to Enron recovering its investment, or (iii) employees are to be offered employment agreements with terms that are not within "Enron norms."  In addition, all significant terms of the compensation plan are to be disclosed in the DASH.

Do I understand this all corrrectly?  Is there anything I have omitted?

If the committee meets only quarterly, timing could certainly be an issue in some transactions.  If that is the case, can special meetings be called?

Teresa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corbet, Nancy
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 10:36 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Cc:	Bushman, Teresa G.
Subject:	Board compensation approval NuTech

Last week Teresa was waiting to hear back from Aaron (sp) regarding the threshold and process for approval. Michelle, Tom Kalb and I have a meeting this aft with Nutech and we all , including John Thompson per his meeting request last week, need to know the steps if any that we need to take on Nutech and similar matters.Michelle/Teresa, appreciate your advice on how best to track this down. Nancy


Ted Murphy and I met this morning with the Arthur Andersen team that
accompanied us to Sao Paulo.  We reviewed a summary of our observations and
recommendations as a result of our visit.  After a few suggested changes, AA
should forward a copy of this draft to you via e:mail later today.  We would
welcome your comments on the document, and input on anything that you think
we may have missed.  Ted and I will be reviewing this information with Rick
Buy and Rick Causey as soon as a meeting can be scheduled, so your prompt
comments or feedback would be welcomed.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/03/2000
04:49 PM ---------------------------

Mail Delivery Subsystem <Mailer-Daemon@postmaster.enron.com> on 06/03/2000
04:23:48 PM
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown

The original message was received at Sat, 3 Jun 2000 16:23:32 -0500 (CDT)
from mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<vkaminski@ol.com>

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to mail.9netave.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<vkaminski@ol.com>
<<< 553 <vkaminski@ol.com>... no such user
550 <vkaminski@ol.com>... User unknown

   ----- Original message follows -----

Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66])
 by postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id QAA13638
 for <vkaminski@ol.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 16:23:32 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37])
 by mailman.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/corp-1.05) with ESMTP id e53LNFC00692
 for <vkaminski@ol.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 16:23:15 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from notes.ect.enron.com (ecthou_gt2.corp.enron.com [172.16.4.33])
 by dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA16875
 for <vkaminski@ol.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 16:23:31 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))
id 862568F3.00758335 ; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 16:23:33 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT
From: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: vkaminski@ol.com
Message-ID: <862568F3.007581E8.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 16:23:28 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

http://biblioteka.sieciowa.to.jest.to/index2.htm


Jeffrey,
?
Congratulations.? Was in?Georgia (Tbilisi) when the news came over the
wires.??Was very happy for you.
?
What's up for the holidays?? I'll be in Paris next Tuesday through Friday,
where I will hook up with my friend Paul from SF (you met him, and though him
a bit of an attention hog) and his girlfriend.? Unfortunately, wasn't able to
extract?Sukran?from the thick goo of her family commitments.?
?
Come join me!
?
Say hey to all,
?
Mark
?
?

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


The following file contains a graphical view of the North American Gas average deal count by Trader and Product for EOL. This information is for comparative analysis only.  Do not update links when opening this file.

If you have any questions regarding this breakout, please let me know .

Thanks,
Adam Johnson
x54877
EnronOnline


Attached is an invitation to the Summer Picnic this Saturday, June 23 from
4:00-9:00 pm at the Regal Ranch.  Many of you may have already received this,
but I wanted to extend my personal invitation to you.  This is a really fun
activity, and has traditionally been one of the best opportunities to visit
with our Program participants on an informal basis.  This is a family outing
with lots of activities for the kids, and you can come and go as you please.

Please make an effort to attend on Saturday, even if you can only join us for
a little while.  Feel free to pass this invitation on to other executives in
your business unit.  The Analysts and Associates tell us that this type of
exposure to our business leaders helps drive excitement and enthusiasm within
the Program.  Your support of events like this is incredibly valuable, and
appreciated.

If you can join us, please rsvp to Jackie Coleman by email, or at extension
x54070.

Thank you,
Billy


The Southeast RTO orders are out and have followed through with what we
expected from the discussion at the FERC meeting.

The SPP and Entergy RTO proposals have been rejected because they fail to
satisfy the scope and configuration requirements of Order No. 2000.  The
Commission  notes that the required discussions between SPP and Entergy and
its neighboring RTO/TOs has led to no increase in the original scope and
configuration.  The filings by SPP and Entergy were brief, indicating only a
lack of interest by other RTOs or utilities in joining to enlarge scope; they
failed to specify any details of the talks, what changes could be made or
what could be fixed to accomodate combination with other RTOs.  The order
states that the Commission favors the development of large, regional
transmission organizations reflecting natural markets.  The Commission
indicates that they favor four RTOs - NE, SE, MW and West.  Therefore the
order requires the participants in SPP and Entergy to participate in
settlement discussions as set out in the mediation order.  Note that these
meetings will start next Tuesday, July 17 before a FERC ALJ.

The Southern Company RTO is also found by the FERC to fail the scope
characteristics of Order No. 2000.  The order finds that Southern's approach
to focus on MOUs and seams issues with its neighbors is inadequate.  The
order states, "We reiterate: the Commission's goal is to have a single RTO in
the Southeast, and to have that single RTO operational as soon as possible."
The Commission recognizes that start-up costs in forming a larger RTO may be
more, but that over the longer term, large RTOs will foster market
development, will provide increased reliability and will result in lower
wholesale electricity prices.  The order therefore directs the parties to the
mediation as stated above.

The Grid South participants are also directed to the mediation which is
starting on next Tuesday.  It is a lengthier order with more details on other
aspects of RTOs, including Independent Board requirement, congestion
managment, interconnection procedures, planning process and CBM.  Therefore,
I am attaching a summary of the order.  One of the important findings of the
order is that GridSouth is not sufficiently independent; the Applicant TOs
are making policy decisions that should be made by an independent board.
Therefore, the order requires GridSouth to install an independent board and
file a compliance filing within 90 days.

If anyone wants copies of the orders, let me know.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
08:16 AM ---------------------------

"FT.com" <ft.com.update@newsbyemail.ft.com> on 09/07/2000 10:16:40 AM
To: "FT.com Users":;
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject: This month's business essentials

Dear FT.com user

** Contents **
1. Battle for the London Stock Exchange
2. FT Search for the best online news
3. US Elections
4. Exclusive Interviews with the FT - Patrick Stewart & Kevin Spacey
5. Financial basics explained
6. Who has the best broker research?

---------------------------------------
1. Battle for the London Stock Exchange
---------------------------------------
Keep up with the battle for the London Stock Exchange. For the
latest news and analysis, for background stories, to have your
say in online discussions and to get your questions answered:

http://markets.ft.com/stockex

------------------
2. News on the web
------------------

Hundreds of thousands of articles are written on the web's major
news sites every day.  But there's no need to go to them all to keep
abreast of the news you need.  FT.com provides access to 1,500 sites
and  presents the freshest headlines first.  Cut your own searching
to just one box - our search facility at the top right hand corner
of every FT.com page.

http://www.ft.com

---------------
3. US Elections
---------------
Gore's cabinet: Who would he pick?
http://people.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&c=Article&cid=FT3A22SVRBC

-----------------------------------
4. Exclusive Interviews with the FT
-----------------------------------
X-man Patrick Stewart
http://people.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&c=Article&cid=FT3SVW50CCC

American Beauty Kevin Spacey
http://people.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&c=Article&cid=FT3NUDTZLCC

-----------------------------
5. Financial basics explained
-----------------------------
Got 5 minutes? Profit from our free multimedia tutorials!
In association with Wide Learning, we offer guidance on such topics as:
'What are shares and bonds?', 'Dividend yield and PE' and 'Investment
strategies'.

http://career.ft.com/CareerAdvisor/Skills/quicklearning/quicklearning_home.htm
l

------------------------------------
6. Who has the best broker research?
------------------------------------
Who's spotting the major trends and developments which can turn
equities into gold (or dust)?  Knowing brokers' expertise - by industry,
by company - isn't information limited just to the securities industry.
You have access to premier rankings from consultancy Tempest too at:

http://tempestdirect.ft.com/

-----------------------------------------------------------

Why not forward this e-mail to a friend or colleague who
may find this information useful?

If you no longer wish to receive further e-mails from FT.com,
please send an e-mail to: ft.com.unsubscribe@newsbyemail.ft.com
with the single word "unsubscribe" as the subject of the message.
Your name will then be removed from our mailing list.

If you have forgotten your password for FT.com, please visit:
http://registration.ft.com/registration/passwordLookup.jsp


no thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rozycki, Joanne
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 9:46 AM
To:	Farrell, Keegan; Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	I am ordering supplies-do you need anything?

no thanks

Joanne Rozycki
Senior Administrative Assistant
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3880D
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-5968     Fax:      (713) 646-3490
Email:   joanne.rozycki@enron.com


(See attached file: HPLN0510.xls)

 - HPLN0510.xls


Sean has COB in his trade log. He originally had Mid-C, then crossed it out.
Sounds like Amerex just hasn't updated their website with the change.

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/09/2001 02:35 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 4/9 Checkout Con't

Amerex West

deal 576348
Sean Crandall
Amerex confirmed deal as COB however, their web checkout has Mid-C.  Can you
please reconfirm the delivery point with Sean.

Thanks


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000
11:00 AM ---------------------------

"Vadim Pokhlebkin" <vpokhleb@ideaus.com> on 04/13/2000 10:23:35 AM
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>, <vkamins@enron.com>, <erms@bloomberg.net>
cc:
Subject: Thursday's IDEA

Dear Vince,

I hope you're doing weel.  Have you heard any feedback about our research
from your colleagues? Please let me know whom I may contact: that will save
you from forwarding our reports to them daily.  I look forward to your
reply.

As usual, attached are today's issues of our daily morning faxes:
1. Financial Markets Today - FX majors and key bond markets' analyses.
2. Fixed Income Today - US treasuries, agencies, and corporates' analyses.

Best regards,
Vadim Pokhlebkin
Account Manager
vpokhlebkin@ideaglobal.com
tel. 1 (212) 571 4332
fax  1 (212) 571 4334

IDEAglobal.com
140 Broadway, 21st Floor
New York, NY 10005, USA

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
IDEAglobal.com. This email, its content and any files transmitted with it
are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged
and/or confidential. Access by any other party is unauthorized without the
express written permission of the sender. If you have received this email in
error you may not copy or use the contents, attachments or information in
any way. Please destroy it and contact the sender via the IDEAglobal.com
switchboard in one of the following three offices: New York +1 212 571 4332;
London +44 171 430 2888; Singapore +65 332 0700

 - FMT0413A.pdf
 - FIT1304A.pdf


The following points highlight legal/regulatory recommendations to the
business team on the DA suspension issue.

All intelligence indicates that the CPUC will act on this issue at its June
28, 2001 meeting (and there are sufficient votes for the decision).
Existing Contracts - It is our recommendation that EES should submit any and
all DASRs to initiate DA service  to the appropriate Utility no later than
June 29, 2001 for all customers that have existing contracts if we want to
ensure DA service.
New Contracts - All new contracts should be signed by both EES and the
customer no later than June 30, 2001 (July 1, 2001 is a Sunday).  DASRs for
these contracts should be submitted to the appropriate Utility as soon as
possible, but in no event later than July 6, 2001.  The July 6 date is our
estimate of the last date the Utility would accept DASRs for new contracts.
It is important to note that the CPUC is keeping the clock on contract
execution timing.
Switching Option - Customers that are on DA service can be returned to the
Utility per the tariff process.  Once the customer has been returned to
Utility service after July 1, 2001, our expectation is that there will be no
ability to have this customer receive DA service in a future timeframe.  In
addition, returning to Utility service may incur a "re-entry fee".
Contract Extensions - EES should consider amending all current contracts that
terminate after July 1, 2001 with a Evergreen Provision that provides for
Index pricing with 30 day cancellation notice provisions.  These amendments
should be signed prior to June 30, 2001.  It is possible that the CPUC will
require marketers to detail the termination dates of their DA customers.  One
additional thought - EES may consider having the customer assign any Negative
CTC receivable to EES as compensation for the Evergreen provision (to
overcome the CPUC language that indicates that the customer is due the
Negative CTC credit).

We intend to set up a call for 5pm Houston time today to discuss (call-in
number to follow).

Jim


Calender.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moffett, Carol
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 4:01 PM
To:	Belden, Tim; Black, Don; Ha, Kenny; Herndon, Rogers; Nat, Steve; O'Neil, Murray P.; Perlman, Beth; Presto, Kevin M.; Richter, Jeff; Will, Lloyd
Cc:	Busby, Todd; Kitchen, Louise; Davidson, Debra; Hutchins, Jennifer; Winkler, Melinda; Finnels-Neal, La Donna; Westbrook, Cherylene R.; Black, Tamara Jae; McDonald, Dawn; Schoppe, Tammie
Subject:	HOLD THE DATE: Wholesale and Retail Power Systems Update & Discussion - October 12, 2001

Please hold October 12, 2000 (10a to 3:00p) on your calendars for an offsite meeting to discuss wholesale and retail power systems.  Logistics are forthcoming.

Attendees
Tim Belden
Don Black
Anthony Dayao
Kenny Ha
Rogers Herndon
Steve Nat
Murray O'Neil
Beth Perlman
Kevin Presto
Jeff Richter
Lloyd Will

Optional Attendees
Todd Busby
Louise Kitchen

Thank you.


Please disregard the memo below and the following will apply for 8/4/00:

Deliveries to Eastrans will be 7,800 MMBtu/dy
Redeliveries into HPL from Fuels Cotton Valley

For 8/5, 8/6, & 8/7 (Saturday, Sunday & Monday) deliveries to Eastrans will be
7,800 MMBtu/dy (23,400 MMBtu for 3 days).  The deliveries of this gas will
occur
in a batch on Monday, 8/7.
Redeliveries into HPL from Fuels Cotton Valley
---------------------- Forwarded by Marta K Henderson/Houston/PEFS/PEC on
08/03/2000 11:21 AM ---------------------------

Marta K Henderson
08/03/2000 08:58 AM

To:   Darrel F. Bane/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, John A. Bretz/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC,
Chad
      W. Cass/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Michael R. Cherry/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Bruce
      McMills/FtWorth/PEFS/PEC@PEC, William E. Speckels/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Donna
      C. Spencer/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Julia A. Urbanek/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Dora J.
      Levy/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, briley@enron.com, dfarmer@enron.com,
      carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com, Sharon Beemer/FtWorth/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Connie
      Wester/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC
cc:

Subject:  Eastrans Nomination changes effective 8/4/00

Please increase deliveries to Eastrans to 30,000 MMBtu/dy effective 8/4/00

The redeliveries will be:

7,800 from Fuels Cotton Valley
22,200 to PG&E


Order accessories, useful add-on software and replacement parts for your Palm III organizer.

Outside the U.S., please refer to the list below:

Australia:  1800 644-606
Canada:  1800 891-6342
Hong Kong:  (852) 2501 1111
New Zealand:  0800 445-323
U.K. :  0800 7311 064

Please refer to the Worldwide Customer Support card for a complete list of accessory ordering information.


Andy:

You are my PRC Rep this year. I would like to drop by to introduce myself and
brief you on my roles and responsibilities. Please let me know what would be
a good time for you. I think 15-20 minutes should be enough.

Murli (X-33236)


pls print for me.  thanks. dF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/13/2000
12:22 PM ---------------------------

Dave Waymire
03/13/2000 10:44 AM
To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: TW Compressor Monetization

Attached is my analysis based on a sales price of $14.2MM and $14.8MM with a
buy back in the 7th year.  The loan structure for Hanover assumes that the
difference between the sales price and TW's buy back price would be amortized
over the contract term.  The remaining balance of the loan is assumed to be a
balloon payment at the end of the finance term.

I will put together some analysis on a 9 year term and forward this on to you
when it is completed.


Here is the form for the Credit Union.  Please give me a call if you have any questions.

Thanks so much for your support!!!

HAPPY THANKSGIVING!!

Lesli Campbell
3-5983


Yesterday, the Federal Trade Commission issued a staff report on electricity restructuring issues.  It is an update of the July 2000 report done at the request of House Energy Chairman Tauzin and Subcommittee Chairman Barton.  They requested the report be updated.  A summary of the report and the full 80+ page text is on the FTC web site at www.ftc.gov on the upper left side of the home page.

I read the summary and will read the balance.  So far, so good.  It basically says that even states that have opened up to retail competition are in transition with a hybrid of regulation and competition, thus the expected benefits of competition have not yet emerged.  However, the report states that nothing to date indicates that competition, once the transition period is over, will not produce additional benefits for consumers.  The report's major conclusion is that competitive wholesale markets are important to achieving effective competition in retail markets.

The summary includes something that sounds promising on RTO policy, saying "And as wholesale and retail markets become regional, governing policies and jurisdictional approaches also must move in that direction for wholesale and retail competition to be successful."


that's pretty cool stuff.  When I get some money again, I'd like to build a nice layout up in our library or maybe a bigger one in the garage.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry.Hyatt@EagleGL.com [mailto:Jerry.Hyatt@EagleGL.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:13 AM
To: Hyatt, Kevin
Subject: Digital Model Trains Help Engineers

 <<Digital Model Trains Help Engineers.htm>>


Stephanie and Sara,

Enclosed is the revised sample forward confirmation marked to show our
comments.  Please feel free to call me with any questions.

Regards,
Beth Ann
_________________
Beth Ann Dranguet
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
One American Center
600 Congress, Suite 2700
Austin, Texas  78701
(512) 495.8595
(512) 236.3226 fax
(888) 203.5056 pager
badranguet@velaw.com

 <<Sample "forward" confirmation (VE comments).DOC>>
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You

 - Sample "forward" confirmation (VE comments).DOC


FYI.  I told Chris that it looks fine with me.  Seems like a useful tactic,
i.e., maybe if you pay me what you owe for power already delivered, I might
consider doing a deal for power going forward....

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/18/2001 11:58 AM -----

	Christopher F Calger@ECT
	02/17/2001 07:21 PM

		 To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Tracy
Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Bob Badeer
		 cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: CDWR Short-Term Firm Energy Proposal

Attached please find a draft letter to David Freeman.  Please review and
provide any comments.  Jeff, do you have the adress and fax number for the LA
Office?
Tracy, Bob and Christian  -  do you approve?  I intend to send this out
Monday.

Regards,

Chris


Thanks for including me.  Congratulations on Emily.  I know that you and she
will be getting used to one another over the next few weeks, and that sleep
will definitely be a scarce commodity.  Those first few weeks can be both
wonderful and terrible at the same time.  Savor the baby stage as much as you
can, and before you know it Emily will be cooing and responding to you in a
way that makes all of the sleepless nights just melt away.  Enjoy your new
role as mom -- it is a wonderful, life-long experience!  --Sally

	From:  Dianne J Swiber                           07/19/2000 08:54 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: It's true what they say...

Sally,
I'm sorry I left you off my original note but I wanted you to know......
Dianne

...the third time is a charm.  After 2 failed adoptions, God has blessed me
with a beautiful daughter!  Emily Lyn was born on Saturday, July 8 at 11:18
am in San Antonio.  She weighed 7 lbs. and measured 19 inches.  She is so
tiny and has a head full of dark hair!  I brought her home last night at 8:30
pm.  Our first
night went well even if I didn't get any sleep.  It's going to take some time
for me to get used to the noises she makes.  I must admit, there were
days when I never thought this would happen.  I appreciate all the kind words
of encouragement many of you have shared over the last few years
as I have gone through this process, especially during the really low
points.  I am truly blessed.
I will be out of the office for a while but feel free to stay in touch as I'm
sure I'll be logging in often.  Also, if I left someone off the list here,
please have them forgive me.  Remember, I'm working on 0 sleep.  Please feel
free to pass this along to anyone I may have fogotten.  Thanks.
Dianne


Hi Stacey:

  The ENAWEATHER book was ran by Casey, WKELLY and RCASIMIR (the last two are user name), but many other people have access to it as well.  Is there specific thing you'd like me to trace down?

- Zhiyun


Let's try to get 8 playoff tickets for the desk.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Black, Tamara Jae
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:19 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	FW: 2001 Astros Playoff Tickets for Kevin Presto

Kevin,

Please let me know if you are interested in purchasing tickets.

Tjae

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grissom, Greg
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:47 AM
To:	Black, Tamara Jae
Subject:	2001 Astros Playoff Tickets for Kevin Presto

It's that time of year again as the Houston Astros are on track to clinch their 4th Central Division title in five years and return playoff baseball to Houston and for the first time at Enron Field.  The Corporate Marketing team is currently finalizing all ticket issues with the Astros for the Division Series, League Championship Series and the World Series.  Please find below a schedule of possible playoff games to be played at Enron Field and information regarding purchasing your season tickets for the 2001 playoffs.

2001 Home Playoff Schedule
*Please note that home field advantage for a given series depends on various factors including a team's record and various other factors.  Therefore, the exact number of games to be played in Houston cannot be determined until each series.

Division Series (DS):

	Home Field Advantage:		October 2, 3, 7
	No Home Field Advantage:	October 5, 6

League Championship Series (LCS):

	Home Field Advantage:		October 9, 10, 16, 17
	No Home Field Advantage:	October 12, 13, 14

World Series (WS):			October 20, 21, 27, 28

2001 Playoff Ticket Information

Step 1	Determine if  you want to purchase your playoff tickets with the same location as your season tickets for account #132871 (sec. 113, row 30, seats 5-8).
	- Playoff ticket price including Division Series, League Championship Series, World Series and a parking pass is $4,865.00 (4 Seats)

Step 2	Please provide us your current CO# and Cost Center information so we my appropriately code your account and or please reply if you would like to decline your 	playoff tickets.

*Please note that should the Astros not play all of the scheduled games, your company and cost center will be refunded for the unplayed games.

We ask that you please respond via email by Wednesday, September 5th.  If you have any questions or if we can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to call David Tagliarino (3-7883) or Greg Grissom (5-8741).

Greg Grissom

 << File: Grissom, Greg.vcf >>


I have a request in for clarification, however, I believe that these are the
scheduled re-runs for settlements for post-final disputes that require
re-runs.  For example, your August 7, 8, and 9 disputes that have yet to be
adjusted, are scheduled for adjustment on June 29th.  Not all post-final
disputes need a market re-run, therefore, some of your postfinal disputes
may be done on an earlier date.  Once they do, I will be notified and then I
will in turn let you know.  At any rate, I will make sure my assumption here
is correct.

Keoni Almeida
California Independent System Operator
phone: 916/608-7053
pager:  916/814-7352
alpha page:  9169812000.1151268@pagenet.net
e-mail:  <mailto:kalmeida@caiso.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Donna.Johnson@enron.com [mailto:Donna.Johnson@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 11:58 AM
To: kalmeida@caiso.com
Subject: Re: CR Communication: Rerun schedule for May, 2001

Keoni,

What is this?  Are there any details available?

Thanks,
Donna

CRCommunications <CRCommunications@caiso.com> on 04/24/2001 11:46:21 AM

To:   SC Settlements Contacts

<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=SCSETTLECONTACTS@c
aiso.com>
cc:   ISO Client Relations <ISOClientRelations@caiso.com>, ISO Settlements

<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISOBUSSYS@caiso.co
m>

Subject:  CR Communication:  Rerun schedule for May, 2001

Important Notice Re-run Schedule for May 2001

Below is the Settlements re-run schedule for the month of May:

- May 11, 2001 for Trade Date January 3 to 15, 2000

- May 18, 2001 for Trade Date January 16 to 31, 2000

- May 25, 2001 for Trade Date May 25 to June 7, 2000

- June 1, 2001 for Trade Date June 8 to June 21, 2000

- June 8, 2001 for Trade Date June 22 to July 5, 2000

- June 15, 2001 for Trade Date July 6 to July 19, 2000

- June 22, 2001 for Trade Date July 20 to August 2, 2000

- June 29, 2001 for Trade Date August 3 to August 16, 2000

Client Relations Communication


Tani,

No problem. We shall look at the curve on Monday. I have organized a  small
team to examine
the curve from different perspectives.

Curve validation is normally a RAC prerogative and I shall get them involved
on Monday

Vince

Tani Nath
10/27/2000 11:40 AM
To: Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Poullain-Patterson, Harry Tefoglou/LON/ECT@ECT, Esther Gerratt/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Copper curve

Following Steve's note to you earlier today, I wanted to mention that we have
a fairly urgent need for review of the copper curve in particular, as there
is a deal due for final pricing in the next few days.

I am not sure what data you have received from Enron Metals in London, so I
am asking Tim Poullain-Patterson to ensure that you have the curves and the
economic justification proposed as soon as possible.  Please direct any
questions to him or to Harry Tefoglou.  I will be in the Tokyo office next
week, but available via e-mail.

Thanks in advance for your assistance,

Tani


Andy I forgot I wont be  the am - my nanny is out.  Can we talk by phone.
Sorry for the inconvenience.