I say keep pushing for an answer.  It will come when it comes, but, in my
opinion, he who pushes his issues the best tends to get closer to what he
wants.

I am hoping we can both do better in both the short term with the tools we
have (working through Sheila Howard/ISC) AND come up with something even
better in the longer run (Project Sunrise).  I would push Sheila, the ISC
will do what it can to the best of our ability (and I am hopeful there are
still some things we can do without the DW to get you closer), and she and I
can push Mark to the extent the ISC can't solve it completely.

Rod Hayslett

12/06/2000 04:18 PM
To: Melissa Becker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: FERC Data Warehouse

Do you think it better that I wait and see what comes of this, or because I
have a singular need that I cause a small group to come togehter and focus on
this?     The fact that there is no solution is the issue and no solution
merely means I have to find one, since I don't have the option of saying it's
too hard or the system can't do it.    On the other hand I'm sure I don't
know all the answers so I'm not sure of what the right process even is.

Mark Frank@ECT
12/04/2000 02:21 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Melissa
Becker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David McEllin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Ozlem
Mahmood/HOU/EES@EES, Sheila Howard/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: FERC Data Warehouse

To all:

Hope this clarifies--

We are currently collating needs data from our interview cycle.
Preliminarily, the interviews confirm our suspicions:
 1. Cost & P/L reporting is the most widely held concern.
 2. Cash flow reporting (treasury, direct & indirect) follows closely.
 3.  There is no easy, readily available solution to FERC reporting.
 4. People have lost ad hoc query functionality with the implementation of
SAP.

Project Sunrise's reporting charter will be to address these needs in the
most efficient, cost effective way possible.
That could be through a data warehouse, could be through the FERC SAP module,
could be through another avenue.
None of us has the answer to the methodology question yet (although we all
have ideas).

I would prefer to keep the Project Sunrise team focused on the task at hand
-- sifting through the interview information and developing a work plan.
We have followup interviews to schedule & complete, a data model to build,
etc. Basically a lot of work on our plates.

However, FERC reporting is clearly a significant need that will be at the
forefront of any reporting solution.
If our goal is to discuss this need in detail tomorrow, I'm all for it! I
need the education.
If our goal is to look at progress towards a solution, we should look to
postpone.
I take responsibility for distracting efforts in progress, but believe the
delay worthwhile.

One final issue: Sean, the Sensecorp consultant who has been working on the
project, is in California.
We may want to wait on his participation.

I believe we are all on the same page.
mhf
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Frank/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 02:04 PM
---------------------------

Ozlem Mahmood@EES
12/04/2000 01:16 PM
To: Mark Frank/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: FERC Data Warehouse

FYI:
---------------------- Forwarded by Ozlem Mahmood/HOU/EES on 12/04/2000 01:14
PM ---------------------------

Melissa Becker@ENRON
12/04/2000 11:16 AM
To: David McEllin/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ozlem Mahmood/HOU/EES@EES, Sheila Howard/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: FERC Data Warehouse

Why wouldn't we?  ETS has a specific gap that needs to be addressed, and we
need to find the best way to fix it.  I would just be sure not to jump to the
DW as the solution, unless the ISC has been given ample opportunity to
propose a solution.  Be sure to go that route, too!

David McEllin
12/01/2000 05:37 PM
To: Melissa Becker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ozlem Mahmood/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Re: FERC Data Warehouse

Will we be proceeding with the Dec 5 meeting? If so, Ozlem could you get
notice out to the original distribution list concerning time and location. I
will be out of the office on Monday, so I would appreciate your assistance in
coordinating the meeting logistics. Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by David McEllin/FGT/Enron on 12/01/2000
05:35 PM ---------------------------

David McEllin
11/30/2000 04:56 PM
To: Melissa Becker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Howard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Frank/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: FERC Data Warehouse

I feel we should proceed with the Dec 5 meeting, at least to get a better
understanding of what the data warehouse can do for us related to FERC, and
maybe determine just how far along it currently is.  The original reason we
were asked to meet on this issue is that it was thought that a lot of work
had already been completed and it wouldn't take much to deliver an end
product. The other attendees, as well as myself, need to understand what this
can do for us as opposed to a potential solution in SAP.

Melissa Becker
11/30/2000 04:28 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sheila Howard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Frank/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
McEllin/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: FERC Data Warehouse

I am not sure the statement below from Ozlem is entirely accurate.  In
addtion to Project Sunrise, I have asked Sheila Howard, who is the lead for
the financial team in the ISC, to work with the Project Sunrise team to
understand what your issues are and help determine a solution.

Let me assure you that whether through the Project Sunrise or the ISC, we are
working on your issue and it has NOT dropped off the radar screen.  As a
matter of fact, Project Sunrise had a status meeting today, and this came up
several times.  I think the only question is "what's the best approach for
solving it"?

I will leave it to Dave, as the ETS representative to Project Sunrise, along
with Sheila, Mark, and the others listed below, to continue to work on a
solution for the FERC problems.  Dave  - is there any reason NOT to proceed
with the December 5 meeting under these assumptions?  I would just ask that
Sheila be included.

Thanks!

Rod Hayslett

11/30/2000 06:18 AM
To: Melissa Becker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: FERC Data Warehouse

If there is going to be no effort to fix my problem as a result  of the
change in the effort, I am wondering why I should support the project at all?

---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 11/30/2000
06:19 AM ---------------------------

James Saunders
11/29/2000 07:54 PM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Lev/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Debbie
Thompson/FGT/Enron@ENRON, John Cobb/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: David McEllin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: FERC Data Warehouse

Do we have any current Form 2 or other FERC related reporting
requirements/concerns as a result of the "redirection" below?

---------------------- Forwarded by James Saunders/FGT/Enron on 11/29/2000
07:54 PM ---------------------------

Ozlem Mahmood@EES
11/29/2000 05:47 PM
To: David McEllin/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jennifer Lev/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Debbie Thompson/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Harry
Walters/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Hoyt Ivey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: FERC Data Warehouse

Dear FERC-interested representatives,

Due to the current redirection of the data warehouse project (which is now
part of Project Sunrise), it has been determined that it is best to postpone
a FERC discussion/analysis until after the  collection of business
requirements and final scoping of the project.    However, I will be
recommending that a focus group be designated for FERC.  Thank you for your
help and patience and I apologize for the upheaval and postponements.

Tzlem

David McEllin@ENRON
11/28/2000 04:35 PM
To: Jennifer Lev/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Debbie Thompson/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Harry
Walters/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Hoyt Ivey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ozlem Mahmood/HOU/EES@EES, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON
Subject: FERC Data Warehouse

The review by ETS of the FERC data warehouse information will be on Tuesday
December 5th at 10:00am, location TBA. This initial review should last approx
one hour and your input would be greatly appreciated. I will inform you of
the location when this is established. Please feel free to contact me if you
have any questions.


No problem

	<Suzanne_Nimocks@mckinsey.com>
	12/07/2000 02:18 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Tomorrow's meeting

I realized that we'll have quite a few people there tomorrow: Rick, Mary ,
Jeff,  you, me, Jon.  Do you have a problem if Dan comes too, or would you
rather not.

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| This message may contain confidential and/or privileged     |
| information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to |
| receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,     |
| disclose or take any action based on this message or any    |
| information herein.  If you have received this message in   |
| error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail |
| and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.   |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+


I actually feel rested this morning.  Outlook for the day is positive.........I'll keep you informed.

Love Jon


Gentlemen --

A busy day in India that is likely to generate substantial press.

MSEB sent us 2 letters stating that there will be no Phase II performance testing, MSEB will not pay any further amounts under the PPA and MSEB will draw no further power from Dabhol.  MSEB requested that DPC stop providing availability declarations.  These letters turn the vague "recission" letter that we received last week into a more concrete repudiation by MSEB.

On Friday, MSEB filed a 120 page petition with the Maharashtra Energy Regulatory Commission seeking relief on a number of issues.  MSEB's position seems to be that because they are no longer bound by the PPA, that the MERC is the appropriate regulatory body to regulate the MSEB/DPC relationship (e.g., determine the price for power and the amount owed by DPC on the misdeclaration claim).  The MERC ruled today that it likely has jurisdiction in this matter and granted some interim relief to MSEB (including stopping any arbitration proceedings by DPC against MSEB).  We are preparing a petition tor the Bombay High Court to overturn the MERC's actions.

The Government of India continues to state publicly that it will not buy power from Dabhol.  Accordingly, we have existing counterparties (MSEB and GOM) that do not want Dabhol's power and are not creditworthy and no reasonable hope at present to find other viable counterparties.

Bruce


I don't want to be the one that blows it, so I'm glad to keep you in the loop.

Roger Ondreko@ECT
01/03/2001 02:47 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: CA Development I and II notice of exercise of purchase option

Please keep me in the loop on the docs.  thank you
Rog

Kay Mann@ENRON
01/03/2001 08:41 AM
To: Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CA Development I and II notice of exercise of purchase option

Hi Roger,

We are going forward with the first deal to move stuff out of TurboPark.  I
don't know if you want to see these types of documents, but what the heck,
here it is!

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/03/2001 08:40
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/03/2001 08:28 AM
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roseann
Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: CA Development I and II notice of exercise of purchase option

I am attaching a revised draft notice of intent to exercise the purchase
option for the equipment for the CA transactions. We need two separate
notices - one for CA I and one for CA II.  Ben/Fred/Rebecca, could you please
prepare a draft of the two exhibits?

Lisa/Catherine/Rose, I revised the form of notice to make it track the
participation agreement and the development and construction management
agreement.

I've tentatively dated the notice as of this Friday.  By my calculations,
Monday is our drop dead date since a waiver of the 5 day period is not an
option, and the deal dies if not closed by the 15th.

Ben mentioned that I should be drafting a "release letter" for the banks
and/or DevCo. It would be a big help if someone could point me to the section
in the documents which set forth the requirements of the release, since I'm
still wading through it all and haven't found the relevant language yet.
Also, please advise of the results of the conference call which you had with
the lenders (?) and/or their lawyers regarding the issue.

I am working on the assignment and assumption agreement.

Thanks,

Kay


I just spoke with Karen at Bloomberg and she says it's off-peak....I am
having her broker to call Diana.

Thanks!!

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/12/2001 04:28 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 2/10/01 Checkout

Diana says it's definitely on peak hours. Let me know....

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/12/2001 02:28 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 2/10/01 Checkout

Dianna Scholtes
deal 519755
Bloomberg shows hours as offpeak...


We will be meeting for dinner at Legends restaurant at 5:00pm with Ted
Jacobs, Tim Rasnic, and some of the students from the JC Penney
Leadership and Energy Management program. Following the dinner, we will
proceed to the presentation at the Oklahoma Memorial Union in
the Scholars/ Associates room located on the third floor and the program will
start at 8:00pm. Jody Crook will introduce the presentation and
then Steve Venturatos who will talk about his career and how he has
transitioned from Land man to an Enron director. I will facilitate the
discussion
and pass the questions to the team. A social will follow the discussion and
last until approximately 10:00pm. I will have a rent car for the group and
take everyone  to and from the dinner, presentation, airport, etc. I will be
in the office all day today and until 11:00am tomorrow if anybody has any
questions or concerns. Thank you for your help.
      George Hope


Apparently there was some miscommunication.  It was very clear to me after
our meeting in Louise's office that with respect to proposed Reference
Entities with which Enron has an existing business relationship you were
going to add the consent to the notice letter.  It was that consent that was
to dramatically speed up the process of determining which Reference Entities
could be listed.  As we discussed last week, without that consent each
proposed Reference Entity must be evaluated separately regarding whether or
not a confidentiality agreement is in place and whether or not the existing
business relationship is extensive enough to require consent.  Neither of
these evaluations will be easy or quick.  While Enron North America has been
reasonably good about compiling lists of confidentiality agreements, it is by
no means clear that all other Enron entities have done so.  We have not yet
determined a process for evaluating the extent of the existing business
relationships with our customers but that process will necessarily require
significant amounts of legal and commercial time at a high enough level to
make important judgment calls.

My impression was that you were willing to add the consents to the notice
letters since in one fell swoop it resolved a difficult legal issue and moved
your earliest possible launch date forward by weeks if not months but also on
the assumption that if a customer was not willing to give us their consent we
should not be taking the commercial risk that it was precisely those
customers whose relationships would be jeopardized by proceeding to use them
as a Reference Entity.

We will now move forward to develop the processes necessary to conduct the
evaluations mentioned above.  Please send the list of proposed Reference
Entities as soon as possible.

Bryan Seyfried
01/19/2000 06:35 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Consent

Just to clarify, we do not intend to ask for consent from every reference
credit, we do intend to send introductory letters to the relevant parties at
the initial set of reference credits which notifies them of our intentions
and why it is good for them.  My hope is that there are very few reference
credits that we need to get consent from and then we can make the commercial
decision of whether it is better to get consent or not quote on them.

As an initial step, I think we need to understand which reference credits
have confidentiality agreements in place and determine those names that we
have a potential fiduciary responsibility.  The latter obviously will not be
black and white but hopefully we can make some progress.  I would expect that
are really deep relationships are likely to be with either really small
counterparties or a very small subset of our large counterparties.

Hopefully I am restating what everyone already thought but if not apologies
for the miscommunication.

Call me if you want to discuss further.

bs


Yeh , the amazing thing about having a tied Bush/Gore election ( I think
that's called Hobson's choice) , with one geriatric resort in Florida
probably deciding which way it finally goes , is that it has actually made me
think (1) that our dear old UK electoral system isn't so bad and (2) that
Phony Blair could be a lot worse!!

Jon

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           09/11/2000 22:37

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jon Chapman/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: The Stae of a Nation

Congratulations.  It is now official.  The media and trial lawyers officially
govern the United Staes of America.  (I suppose it could be worse.  You could
live in the Peoples Republic of Canada, or have some appendage to an armbag
running the show.)


The report named: Power West P/L <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=28&report_name=Power+West+P/L&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/24/2001>, published as of 10/24/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 5)


Monday is good !

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Hello, Mr. Sanders.  I am Marty Sunde's assistant and I am writing regarding
the 11/22/00 letter from Palmer, Guest & Esses regarding Euell Energy
Resources.  The letter was addressed to Mr. Lay and Marty Sunde in EES
received a copy.  We sent the letter to our General Counsel, Vicki Sharp, who
advises that she passed it on to you for handling.  As the 12/15/00 deadline
(set forth in Mr. Esses' letter) is approaching, I thought I would follow up
to see if a response has been provided to them.  If this has already been
taken care of, would you be so kind as to fax a copy of the letter to us for
our file.  Our fax number is (713) 646-2199.

Please let me know.

Thank you.


lets definately play tomorrow.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Marcantel MM (Mitch)" <MMMarcantel@equiva.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Marcantel+20MM+20+28Mitch+29+22+20+3CMMMarcantel+40equiva+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, May 25, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

works for me.

Golf tomorrow? Make a tee time and let me know. I don't care where we go.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 10:27 AM
To: Hull, Bryan; Mena, Luis; Gillette, Lisa; Scott, Susan M.;
mmmarcantel@equiva.com; kevin.a.boone@accenture.com
Subject:

do you guys want to hit el patio early on saturday and get some blue
ritas and then head over to uropa?  that would be a good night to go
tear it up completely.


Beeker,
    Thanks for clearing up the rumors that the site was down.  I appreciate
it.

Yours in -kai-,
Drow

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
smu-betas-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Alert Posted: 3:45 PM November 21, 2000: CGC Interruptibles released Wed,
11/22 10 AM
After further review of the weather and load forecast for Wednesday,
Chattanooga Gas Company (CGC) is releasing the interruptible customers from
the curtailment order effective Wednesday, November 22, 2000 at 10:00 a.m.

Have a Happy Thanksgiving!


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com>
To: "'Larry W. Bass'" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 8:30 AM
Subject: RE: the tree

> We will be there.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry W. Bass [mailto:lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 5:03 PM
> To: Shanna Husser; Donnita Franklin; Bass, Jason; eric preston bass
> Cc: KATHY BASS
> Subject: the tree
>
>
> Hi Guys. We intend to decorated the home and tree this Sunday, if you guys
> can join us. Here is the deal. We will order Chinese food from Fungs
Kitchen
> on the SW freeway, Shanna and Eric can pick it up, I will pay, everyone
be
> here early p.m., eat around 4-5, put the decorations up, have a good time.
> Any takers? Let me hear from you.-Dad


Kate, no problem at all, I just wanted to give you and Cara a chance to look
at it too.  Thanks,

Brett

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Symes, Kate
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 11:54 AM
To: Pate, Brett
Subject: Re: Fwd Obligation Testing

Brett -

I'm so sorry for not sending you an e-mail last night! I did test the report
and it looks just fine - but I had so many things going on right up until I
left that I forgot to tell YOU that it looked fine. Thanks for the reminder,
and for your work on the report.

Kate

From: Brett Pate/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/29/2001 09:10 AM CST
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Fwd Obligation Testing

Kate, were you able to test the Fwd Obligation Report?  Mr. Luu is ready to
push it in to production, but we wanted you to look at it and give it your ok
first.

Thanks,

Brett Pate
Enpower QA


To:		All Enron Employees

From:	Raymond Bowen, Jr.
		EVP, Finance & Treasurer

Subject:	Update on Employee Expense Reimbursement

Post-Petition Expenses

Effective immediately, the processing of expense reimbursement for business expenses incurred by employees after Enron Corp.'s Chapter 11 filing (after December 2nd) has returned to normal.  Expenses will be reimbursed promptly upon submission.  Employees should conduct business travel in the ordinary course of business as approved by direct supervisors.  New travel and entertainment guidelines regarding business travel and other employee expenses will be forthcoming.  In the meantime, please use discretion as you incur expenses.  All expenditures should be made with consideration given to Enron's current financial situation.

Pre-Petition Expenses

We will immediately begin to reimburse pre-petition expenses for current and former employees (incurred prior to the December 2nd Chapter 11 filing) up to a maximum of $5,000.  We understand that a number of employees have pre-petition expenses in excess of $5,000.  However, under the first day orders of the bankruptcy court, there is a $15,000 allowance per employee for unpaid pre-petition compensation, benefits, and related employee expenses.  This $15,000 cap was imposed without input from Enron management and counsel.  We have sought clarification from the bankruptcy court to assure that this $15,000 cap does NOT include the reimbursement of medical, dental, or vision related expenses.

We have commenced a manual review of every individual with pending pre-petition expenses in excess of $5,000.  Even prior to clarification from the court regarding the medical/dental/vision expense issue, we will begin to reimburse pre-petition expenses in excess of $5,000 and up to $15,000 as soon as we can verify that the aggregate reimbursements to an individual employee have not exceeded the $15,000 cap.  Unfortunately, since this will be a manual process, it will take some time to work through.  Employees with pre-petition business expenses in excess of $5,000 can assist us with this manual review process by providing a brief email summary of their situation, including the total amount of pending pre-petition medical/dental/vision claims, to expensereport@enron.com.

Thank you for your patience.


Not yet.  May not be until sept 5 as ken is on vacation.  but there is a
chance that ken will try to reach him in the meantime.  I'll let you know
when I hear.

	From:  Chris Long                           08/21/2000 03:22 PM

Sent by: Amy Fabian
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: CFTC call to Gramm

Steve - Missed you in LA last week.  Thanks for working with Ken on the CFTC
talking points.  Do you know if the call between Ken and Sen. Gramm occured
and if there was any follow up needed.

Thanks - Chris


Andreas:

Here it is:

Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director - Research
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Room EB1962
Houston, TX 77002-7361

Phone: (713) 853 3848
Fax  :  (713) 646 2503
E-mail: vkamins@enron.com

Vince

"Andreas Simou" <andreas@garpmail.com> on 09/15/2000 09:11:00 AM
To: <John.P.DeLuca@us.hsbc.COM>
cc:
Subject: The GARP 2001 Convention

Dear GARP Speak
?
I am writing to request some information regarding  the GARP 2001 Convention.
?
Can you please furnish me with your full postal  address so that I can send
you a copy of the GARP brochure in the near  future.
?
I look forward to your response in due  course.
?
Kind regards
?
Andreas
?
____________________________
Andreas  Simou
GARP 2001 - Conference Producer
Tel? +44 (0) 20 7626  9301
Fax +44 (0) 20 7626 9900


Gas Day 29

Nomination into Eastrans of 45,000 mmbtu

Redeliveries:

13,482  PG&E
  7,000  Fuels Cotton Valley
21,518  Mobil Beaumont
  3,000  HPL CW at Carthage

Gas Day 30

Nomination into Eastrans of 75,000 mmbtu

Redeliveries

43,482  PG&E
  7,000  Fuels Cotton Valley
21,518  Mobil Beaumont
  3,000  HPL CW at Cartage


I asked Bob about these this morning, and he said he's still got to work this
out with Constellation. The way he explained it, our position is flat with
Constellation, so for settlements purposes we're okay - i.e. We've bought the
same volumes that we've sold, and we end up losing a bit due to the index
offset - but otherwise the index price won't make a difference.  But I
suspect he's not thinking of the problem from the confirmation standpoint.
Could you tell me exactly what needs to happen to clear this up on your end
so that I can explain it to Bob in a way that might make him DO something?
I'm sorry for the delay on this - I'm getting ready to call Bob's contact at
Constellation for him.

Let me know what your ideal solution would be. Should we get Constellation to
agree to the Dow Jones index? Or should we change the deals to forward fixed
price? We'll fix this today - I promise.

Thanks,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
04/17/2001 08:12 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Constellation Cal Px trades

Hello, any news on these Constellation Cal PX trades?
Thanks,
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001
09:06 AM ---------------------------
   Kate Symes                03/30/2001 12:57 PM

To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Constellation Cal Px trades

I just talked to Bob, and I don't know if he's responded yet, but I thought
I'd fill you in anyway. He's been talking to his contact at Constellation
about changing these deals over, but hasn't received a concrete answer yet.
I've reminded him and he said he WILL talk to the guy and resolve it today.
I'll keep on it, and let you know when these deals have been changed.

Thanks,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
03/29/2001 11:13 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Constellation Cal Px trades

Hello, I hate to bug you with this.  Whenever you can spare a second would
you ask Bob about this?  I am afraid it is going to slip through the cracks.

Thanks for your help!
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001
12:07 PM ---------------------------

Melissa Ann Murphy
03/26/2001 10:34 AM
To: Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Constellation Cal Px trades

Hi Bob, I was wondering if you have contacted Constellation about the 6
trades that are in the system with the Cal Px as the index price.  All of
these trades start flowing in July of this year.

The deal numbers are as follows:

453152.01
453175.01
453294.01
462109.01
471888.01
471889.01

Let me know if Constellation agrees to change these deals to the Dow Jones so
I can send a letter for them to sign.

Thanks,
Melissa


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/24/2000 05:51
PM ---------------------------

michael.barnas@ps.ge.com on 10/24/2000 05:54:04 PM
To: Sheila.Tweed@enron.com, Ben.Jacoby@enron.com, Scott.Dieball@enron.com,
kay.mann@enron.com
cc: kent.shoemaker@ss.ps.ge.com, stephen.swift@ps.ge.com

Subject: RE: GE CONFERENCE CALL

Dear Fellow Sufferers,

For the benefit of all the Fellow Sufferers, I attach herewith a modified
version of the Assignment language, which was developed by Sheila and me
after our last call.  Let's discuss tomorrow!

I look forward to talking with you all then!

 Mike
g _____________
Michael C. Barnas
Counsel, Power Plants Commercial Operations
GE Power Systems
One River Road - Building 37, Room 307
Schenectady,  NY 12345  USA
Phone 8*235-7602       (518) 385 7602
Fax     8*235 5466        (518) 385 5466
Mobile 518 369 9538

 - WorldHungerAssignmentOct18Rev3.doc


Drogi Panie Andrzeju,

Tak, powininen Pan skontaktowac sie z Jarkiem Astramowiczem, jak rowniez
z p.  Jerzym Cieslikem, partner w Ernest&Young w W-wie, jednym z zalozycieli
AIESECu w Polsce.

W. Kaminski

Andrzej WODNICKI <awodni@sgh.waw.pl> on 02/18/2000 05:16:34 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: AIESEC Polska - EuroLDS 2000

On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Vince J Kaminski wrote:

Szanowny Panie Kaminski,

Juz sama Pana odpowiedz bardzo mnie ucieszyla. Czy ze swojej
strony rowniez mam skontaktowac sie z Panem Astramowiczem w
Polsce, jako AIESEC SGH Mielismy juz kontakt z tym Panem podczas
DNi Kariery?

Z powazaniem

Andrzej WOdnicki

ps. Jeszcze raz bardzo przepraszam za klopot.
I tym bardziej goraco dziekuje za wszelka pomoc.

>
>
> Drogi Panie Andrzeju,
>
> Probuje skontaktowac sie z Jarkiem Astramowiczem, by znalezc sposob
> dofinansowania Waszej imprezy.
> Jedyna mozliwosc, by to zrobic jest poprzez Enron Poland. Mnie byloby
> bardzo trudno usprawiedliwic to z mojego budzetu.
>
> W. Kaminski
>
>
>
>
> "Andrzej Wodnicki" <awodni@sgh.waw.pl> on 02/16/2000 02:50:05 AM
>
> To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
> cc:
> Subject:  AIESEC Polska - EuroLDS 2000
>
>
>
>
> Szanowny Panie Kaminski!
>
> Nazywam sie Andrzej Wodnicki i jestem czlonkiem Stowarzysznia Studentow
AIESEC
> przy Szkole Glownej Handlowej (dawnej SGPiS).
>
> Prosze o poswiecenie paru chwil na przeczytanie tego maila.
> (Kontakt do Pana otrzymalem od kolegi, ktory organizowal prezentacje firmy
ENRON
> na SGH, a posrednio od Pana Jarka Astramowicza, przedstawiciela ENRON na
> Polske.)
>
> W imieniu AIESEC Polska chcialbym zwrocic sie do Pana z wielka prosba pomocy
> przy wydarzeniu, ktore w tym roku organizujemy.
> AIESEC Polska, a w szczegolnosci AIESEC przy Szkole Glownej Handlowej ma
> zaszczyt organizowac w tym roku European Leadership Development Seminar.
Jest to
> seminarium na temat przywodztwa skierowne do obecnych i przyszlych czlonkow
Rad
> Wykonawczych Komitetow Lokalnych  AIESEC w calej Europie.
> Po raz pierwszy AIESEC Polska ma mozliwosc organizacji takiego wydarzenia i
> stanowi ono dla nas olbrzymie wyzwanie.
>
> Przygotowywalismy sie do niego od kilku lat i obecnie jestesmy juz w
koncowej
> fazie organizacji EuroLDS 2000.
> Projekt rozpoczyna sie 7 marca 2000 roku Oficjalnym Otwarciem przez Pana
> Prezydenta Aleksandra Kwasniewskiego w Sali Kongresowej. Pozniej odbeda sie
> Dyskusje Panelowe (udzial wielu znakomitych gosci - m.in Jan Krzysztof
Bielecki,
> Jacek Saryusz Wolski, Andrzej Olechowski)  oraz wyklady i prezentacje
regionow
> Polski w Auli Spadochronowej Szkoly Glownej Handlowej, a nastepnie delegaci
> udadza sie do hotelu Mrongovia na szkolenia, casy i wyklady na temat
> przywodztwa. (Szczegolowy program EuroLDS 2000 przesylam w zalaczniku.)
>
> Jak do tej pory staralismy sie mozliwie najwiecej dokonac wlasnymi silami,
> jednak obecnie na 3 tygodnie przed tym wydarzeniem stoimy przed pewnym
problemem
> i stad tez pojawil sie pomysl skontaktowania Pana, jako osoby, ktora
moglaby nam
> wydatnie pomoc.
>
> Chcielibysmy poprosic Pana o wsparcie finansowe.
> Wspolpracujemy juz z wieloma firmami i instytucjami (m.in. Deloitte &
Touche,
> Arthur Andersen, Fundusz Phare, Fundacja Konrada Adenauera oraz wieloma
innymi),
> jednak na obecnym etapie organizacji projektu wciaz brakuje nam 12000 $.
> Poczatkowo chcielismy nawiazac kontakt z Pania Eileen Price z Londynu,
jednak
> wydaje nam sie, ze Pan jako zalozyciel AIESEC w Polsce powienien po
pierwsze o
> takim wydarzeniu wiedziec, a po drugie mamy nadzieje, ze moze nam Pan pomoc.
>
> Bardzo prosze o odpowiedz,
>
>
> Z powazaniem
>
>
> Andrzej Wodnicki
> Prezydent EuroLDS 2000
> AIESEC Szkola Glowna Handlowa
>
>
>
>


<http://www.forestweb.com/digest/images/news/corps/199.gif>

NewsBeat:Daily News 10/03/2001

This email is a daily service of Forestweb <http://www.forestweb.com>'s NewsBeat.

All the stories from Wednesday, Oct. 3, are available under Wednesday's Headlines. <http://www.forestweb.com/taf/yesterday.taf?dt=10/03/01>

Newly posted on Forestweb: Wood Markets. U.S. CVD Action. Click Wood Markets  <http://www.forestweb.com/editorial/analyst/retaylor/retaylor.09.27.01.pdf>to download.

If this NewsBeat. was forwarded to you by a colleague, please respect our copyright and get your own subscription. Corporate rates are available. For more information email NewsBeat <mailto:newsbeat@forestweb.com>

Contents

Brazil's Votorantim acquires Anglo American?s stake in Aracruz for $370 million ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#story14012>...)
Gaylord not fazed by lawsuit opposing acquisition by Temple-Inland ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#story13990>...)
Wisconsin says Fox River cleanup to cost paper companies $308 million ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#story14009>...)
Indonesia's APP: The decline and fall of a paper empire ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#story14010>...)
Ford truck ads tout steel, concrete as having 'advantages' over wood ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#story13987>...)
United Stationers to restructure; changes CFO again, expects lower sales ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#story14013>...)
Advertising troubles hit media, force magazine shutdowns ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#story13973>...)
Terrorist attacks sting U.S. furniture industry ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#story13975>...)
Chesapeake restructure axes 50 employees at Richmond, Va.; may trim Scotland packaging ops ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#story13981>...)

Brazil's Votorantim acquires Anglo American?s stake in Aracruz for $370 million

10/03/2001 16:02:48, Press Release

S?o Paulo, SAO PAULO, Oct. 3, 2001 (press release) -- Votorantim Celulose e Papel S.A. (VCP) - (NYSE: VCP; BOVESPA: VCPA4), one of the largest paper and pulp producers in Latin America, today announced that it has entered into an agreement to acquire, through one of its affiliates, a 28% voting interest (12.3% total interest excluding treasury stock) in Aracruz Celulose in Brazil, the world's largest producer of bleached eucalyptus kraft market pulp....
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=14012&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#top>
  _____

Gaylord not fazed by lawsuit opposing acquisition by Temple-Inland

10/03/2001 09:03:50, Forestweb

SAN FRANCISCO, Oct. 3, 2001 (Forestweb) -- Gaylord Container Corp. said yesterday it will "vigorously defend" its proposed merger with Temple-Inland Inc. despite a lawsuit filed by a debt holder against the planned $786 million deal. ...
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=13990&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#top>
  _____

Wisconsin says Fox River cleanup to cost paper companies $308 million

10/03/2001 15:46:56, PRNewswire

GREEN BAY, Wis., Oct. 2, 2001 (press release) -- Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Secretary Darrell Bazzell and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 5 Administrator Tom Skinner today announced the Lower Fox River and Green Bay Proposed Remedial Action (cleanup) Plan for polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contaminated sediment at a news conference in Green Bay....
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=14009&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#top>
  _____

Indonesia's APP: The decline and fall of a paper empire

10/03/2001 15:48:20, Asia Times

By Bill Guerin

JAKARTA, Oct. 4, 2001 (Asia Times) -- Debt? How about a staggering US$12 billion, enough to sort out the Indonesian economy good ...
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=14010&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#top>
  _____

Ford truck ads tout steel, concrete as having 'advantages' over wood

10/03/2001 08:19:53, Forestweb

ATLANTA, Oct. 3, 2001 (Forestweb) -- Ford Motor Company "advertorials" appearing in The Family Handyman magazine have the wood industry crying foul.

In a special advertising section, Ford ...
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=13987&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#top>
  _____

United Stationers to restructure; changes CFO again, expects lower sales

10/03/2001 17:37:09, PRNewswire

Editor's Note: United Stationers on Aug. 13 named Timothy J. Feeheley as CEO.

See Forestweb:

United Stationers names new CFO

http://www.forestweb.com/taf/news.taf?_function...
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=14013&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#top>
  _____

Advertising troubles hit media, force magazine shutdowns

10/02/2001 18:30:05, Press Reports

SAN FRANCISCO, Oct. 2, 2001 (Forestweb/press reports) -- Troubles for the magazine industry surfaced in news reports today that publisher Conde Nast would shut down its Mademoiselle magazine and a statement by McGraw-Hill Companies that it reduced its earnings outlook for the current quarter. ...
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=13973&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#top>
  _____

Terrorist attacks sting U.S. furniture industry

10/03/2001 05:07:07, Industrial Strength Woodworking

By Hannah Miller

Oct. 2, 2001 (Industrial Strength Woodworking) -- The U.S. home furniture industry, already reeling from a slowed economy, can expect further sales setbacks in the wake of the Se...
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=13975&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#top>
  _____

Chesapeake restructure axes 50 employees at Richmond, Va.; may trim Scotland packaging ops

10/03/2001 06:37:30, BW

RICHMOND, Va., Oct. 3, 2001 (press release) -- Chesapeake Corporation today announced a restructuring program consistent with the Company's intention to reduce corporate overhead and rationalize its manufacturing network after undertaking a series of acquisitions in Europe over the past two years. ...
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=13981&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1848&_UserReference=0AC1CF8A0CEEED663BBB3CDE#top>
  _____

To opt out of this newsletter or to make suggestions regarding NewsBeat, please email NewsBeat <mailto:pricebeat@forestweb.com>.

All news reports are copyrighted by the respective authors.
powered by Forestweb


FYI - This attachment is what we compared against.

-----Original Message-----
From: Levine, Ross [mailto:rlevine@fce.com]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 8:29 AM
To: Leitman, Jerry; Leo, Tony; Bentley, Chris; 'Jacqueline Scheib'
Cc: Mahler, Joseph
Subject: FW: Rev next of purchase agreement

Here's the latest from Enron. I haven't looked at it yet. When do we want a
joint review session?
Ross

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [SMTP:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 9:44 PM
> To: rlevine@fce.com; hnock@fce.com
> Cc: Scott.Healy@enron.com; Stephen.Plauche@enron.com;
> Heather.Kroll@enron.com
> Subject: Rev next of purchase agreement
>
> Hi there,
>
> I'm attaching the latest version of the purchase agreement.  I will
> prepare
> a compared version in the am if you will tell me which version you want it
> compared against.
>
> Talk to you soon,
>
> Kay
>
> (See attached file: FuelCellequipmentNov2rev2.doc)
> <<FuelCellequipmentNov2rev2.doc>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------
This transmittal may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may
otherwise be privileged or confidential. If it is not clear that you are the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you suspect that you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
telephone at 1-860-275-8200, or e-mail at it@rc.com and immediately delete
this message and all its attachments.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------

 - FuelCellequipmentNov2rev2.doc


Jeff,

Hope all is well with you. I'm just dropping you this note to let you know I
haven't forgotten your call concerning the sale of your share in the Rio
house...I've been extremely busy getting my immigration status in order and
setting up my company in London.

I've also asked Price Waterhouse to update all the accounts of Swanswalk Ltd
in Ireland (the company that owns the house) and see the best way forward
for a potential transaction seeking to minimize Brazilian and Irish taxes.

My personal matters should take me a few more weeks and I will contact you
to discuss the house shortly thereafter.

Regards,

Diomedes.


In a frank discussion with Barry I had to advise him that it will be very
difficult for him to succeed in the role I proposed for him (and indeed in
his current role in the medium term). He is standing in the cross-hairs of a
rifle sight - one move and he's dead.

I have no doubt that we will find a role for this talented individual which
will enable him to sustain the tremendous level of contribution that we are
used to seeing from him.

Of course it will mean that progress in developing our trading support
operations will be slower than it otherwise would have been. I shall be
looking for a suitable candidate to fill the co-ordination role - as you
know, individuals of the necessary calibre and experience are rare.

Fernley


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:44:08 -0500
From: "Bobby Boudet" <bobby.bouduet@psiusa.com>
To: patrick.lewis@psiusa.com
Cc: Carlos.Giron@psiusa.com
Subject:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline

                      Comment

                      A Must Read From the Miami Herald

                      Read this and try not to tear up...
                      by Leonard Pitts Jr. of the Miami Herald
                      We'll go forward from this moment

                      It's my job to have something to say.
                      They pay me to provide words that help make sense of that which troubles the
                      American soul. But in this moment of airless shock when hot tears sting
                      disbelieving eyes, the only thing I can find to say, the only words that seem to
                      fit, must be addressed to the unknown author of this suffering.

                      You monster. You beast. You unspeakable bastard.

                      What lesson did you hope to teach us by your coward's attack on our World
                      Trade Center, our Pentagon, us? What was it you hoped we would learn?
                      Whatever it was, please know that you failed.

                      Did you want us to respect your cause? You just damned your cause.

                      Did you want to make us fear? You just steeled our resolve.

                      Did you want to tear us apart? You just brought us together.

                      Let me tell you about my people. We are a vast and quarrelsome family, a family
                      rent by racial, social, political and class division, but a family nonetheless. We're
                      frivolous, yes, capable of expending tremendous emotional energy on pop
                      cultural minutiae -- a singer's revealing dress, a ball team's misfortune, a
                      cartoon mouse. We're wealthy, too, spoiled by the ready availability of trinkets
                      and material goods, and maybe because of that, we walk through life with a
                      certain sense of blithe entitlement. We are fundamentally decent, though --
                      peace-loving and compassionate. We struggle to know the right thing and to
                      do it. And we are, the overwhelming majority of us, people of faith, believers in
                      a just and loving God.

                      Some people -- you, perhaps -- think that any or all of this makes us weak.
                      You're mistaken. We are not weak. Indeed, we are strong in ways that cannot
                      be measured by arsenals.

                      IN PAIN

                      Yes, we're in pain now. We are in mourning and we are in shock. We're still
                      grappling with the unreality of the awful thing you did, still working to make
                      ourselves understand that this isn't a special effect from some Hollywood
                      blockbuster, isn't the plot development from a Tom Clancy novel. Both in terms
                      of the awful scope of their ambition and the probable final death toll, your
                      attacks are likely to go down as the worst acts of terrorism in the history of the
                      United States and, probably, the history of the world. You've bloodied us as we
                      have never been bloodied before.

                      But there's a gulf of difference between making us bloody and making us fall.
                      This is the lesson Japan was taught to its bitter sorrow the last time anyone hit
                      us this hard, the last time anyone brought us such abrupt and monumental
                      pain. When roused, we are righteous in our outrage, terrible in our force. When
                      provoked by this level of barbarism, we will bear any suffering, pay any cost, go
                      to any length, in the pursuit of justice.

                      I tell you this without fear of contradiction. I know my people, as you, I think,
                      do not. What I know reassures me. It also causes me to tremble with dread of
                      the future.

                      In the days to come, there will be recrimination and accusation, fingers pointing
                      to determine whose failure allowed this to happen and what can be done to
                      prevent it from happening again. There will be heightened security, misguided
                      talk of revoking basic freedoms. We'll go forward from this moment sobered,
                      chastened, sad. But determined, too. Unimaginably determined.

                      THE STEEL IN US

                      You see, the steel in us is not always readily apparent. That aspect of our
                      character is seldom understood by people who don't know us well. On this day,
                      the family's bickering is put on hold.

                      As Americans we will weep, as Americans we will mourn, and as Americans, we
                      will rise in defense of all that we cherish.

                      So I ask again: What was it you hoped to teach us? It occurs to me that maybe
                      you just wanted us to know the depths of your hatred. If that's the case,
                      consider the message received. And take this message in exchange: You don't
                      know my people. You don't know what we're capable of. You don't know what
                      you just started.

                      But you're about to learn.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2000 07:30 PM -----

	Morris Richard Clark
	05/30/2000 07:24 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Language for the Confirmation

Tana,

The language in the Schedule should reflect what is in our Form#3, whereby
"Enron Re:" is the U.S. entity and "Swiss RE - EFR" is a Barbados entity.
Also, the tax form requested should be a W-8.

In addition, the following language should be added to the confirmation:

United States Federal Income Tax Characterization and Reporting.  The parties
recognize and intend that, for United States federal income tax purposes, any
payment by the Counterparty of the Floating Amount will be treated as a
payment pursuant to a guaranty by the Counterparty of the obligations of Bob
West Treasure, LLC to make payments pursuant to Section ___ of the
[underlying Financing Agreement between Bob West Treasure and Royal Bank of
Canada.]  The parties agree that to the extent either of the parties is
required to report any item of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit
relating to the Transaction for United States federal income tax purposes,
such party shall report such item consistent with the characterization set
forth above and shall not take any position on any tax return or report
relating to United States federal income taxes which is inconsistent with
such characterization.  The parties recognize that the manner in which they
have agreed to characterize the Transaction for United States federal income
tax purposes may be inconsistent with the manner in which the Transaction is
characterized for other tax purposes and for accounting, regulatory or other
purposes.  The provisions of this Section are not intended to affect the
manner in which the parties report the Transaction for such other purposes,
or the interpretation of the provisions of the Confirmation and the rights
and obligations of the Parties arising hereunder, for any purposes.


TD {font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal; color: black; }   .myWxTitle {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold; color: white; }   .myWxTitle1 {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; font-weight: bold; color: black; }   .myWxTitle2 {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; font-weight: bold; color: 003399; }   .drkWxTitle {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold; color: black; }   .redWxTitle {font-family:  Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal; color: red; }   .blueWxTitle {font-family:  Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal; color: blue; }  	 .smallWxTitle {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 8pt; font-weight: normal; color: white; }  .smallDrkWxTitle {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; font-weight: normal; color: black; } 	 .categoryTitle { font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Sans Serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold; color: black; }  .bodyText { font-family: Arial,Helvetica,Sans Serif; font-size: 10pt; color: black; }  .captionText { font-family: Arial,Helvetica,Sans Serif; font-size: 8pt; color: black; }  .sectionTitle { font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Sans Serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold; color: black; }
[IMAGE]
  Doug's weather for 2/6/2002 Update Profile  | Unsubscribe    [IMAGE]  Local Outlook for Houston, TX           5 DAY FORECAST        Hi  Lo  Today  [IMAGE] Cloudy ?F  37?F  Thu  [IMAGE] Mostly Sunny 57?F  41?F  Fri  [IMAGE] Mostly Sunny 63?F  45?F  Sat  [IMAGE] Partly Cloudy 68?F  41?F  Sun  [IMAGE] Partly Cloudy 65?F  38?F      [IMAGE]              DETAILED FORECAST    Tonight: Partly cloudy skies.  Low near 37F. Light N winds. Tomorrow: Mostly sunny skies.  High near 57F. Winds N 10 to 15 mph. Tomorrow night: Starlit skies.  Low around 41F. Winds near calm. Friday: Mostly sunny early then partly cloudy later in the day.  High near 63F. Winds SSE 5 to 10 mph.          WEATHER HEADLINES   A glancing blow for Northeast tomorrow  An ocean storm should deliver only a glancing blow to parts of the Northeast tomorrow.  [IMAGE] More details   [IMAGE]      MAPS  Doppler Radar Maps  Other Maps    CURRENT CONDITIONS AND 10 DAY FORECAST  Houston, TX   Austin, TX  Corpus Christi, TX  Dallas, TX        IN THE SPOTLIGHT - Ski Features  The powder is piling up! Introducing ski  on weather.com...   Want to know what the weather is like on your favorite ski slopes?  Is the surface snow powdery, or is it packed?  Want more information on the resort?     Our newly revamped Ski section on weather.com  features detailed local forecasts for ski areas worldwide with trail maps, web cams, and comprehensive resort details.  It also includes our exclusive Ski Comfort Index, that helps you decide where and when will be best for skiing.  Ski by it!  weather.com/ski     HEALTH  Are you a human barometer?  Changes in the weather have long been associated with joint pain, headaches and other health concerns.  weather.com's new Aches and Pains section can help you be prepared.    [IMAGE]   Aches & Pains Features   Air Quality Reports   Personal Allergy Profile    click to enlarge        SITE LINKS   For more information on additional topics choose from the following links:    Home and Garden  School Day  Weather In Your Calendar
 You  are receiving this e-mail because you requested The Weather Channel  to send newsletters and announcements to you at doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com. If you feel that you have received this message in error, or if  you no longer wish to receive these messages, you can unsubscribe   anytime.  If you have any questions or concerns about how we use your personal  information, please read our privacy  policy .  We welcome all feedback from our members, please  send us your comments  or questions.  Copyright (c) 1995-2001, The Weather Channel Enterprises,  Inc.  [IMAGE]


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/05/2001 03:16 PM -----

	"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
	03/05/2001 12:07 PM

		 To: "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'"
<DKK@eslawfirm.com>, "'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan
Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'" <smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jean Munoz (E-mail)'"
<jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
<Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John
Larrea (E-mail)'" <john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'Katie
Kaplan (E-mail)'" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "'kent Palmerton (E-mail)'"
<kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Kristin Vellandi (E-mail)'"
<kvellandi@pstrategies.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>,
"'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'" <mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Roger Pelote
(E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell (E-mail)'"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Theo Pahos (E-mail)'" <tpahos@ppallc.com>, "'Tom Ross
(E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>
		 cc: "Steven Kelly (E-mail)" <steven@iepa.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "Carol H Hudson (E-mail)" <Chudson@iepa.com>
		 Subject: Seeing the Light

Greetings:
Attached please find the new draft of the "Seeing the Light".  You can see
that some holes remain to be filled in - particularly in the solutions
section at the end and we will be using the solutions we came up with at the
last in-person meeting as the foundation.  In light of recent activities it
may also be wise to add an Operations and Maintenance section with
comparisons as to how facilities were operated in the past and how they are
operated now.

On the production side, the graphs etc. have not been replicated yet and
McNally Temple will use the new data from MRW to make adjustments.

As always we invite comments and suggestions on this as well as any
suggested additions.  Please review this document this week and give me any
initial comments as soon as possible.  I would like the first round of
comments by COB on Thursday so we can turn it around for another review.
Thank you for taking the time to review this and as always please let me
know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

 - Update to Seeing the Light 3-1-01.doc


We have called Henwood - they are working on a NYC curve - hopefully Monday.

Chris Calger
503-464-3735


missing deals

buy avista
cal 02
92.00
25 mw
pv
on peak

buy tractebel
25 mw
73.00
Q4 02
pv
on peak


Heather - the original of the Action of General Partner for the captioned LP was inadvertently sent to you yesterday by Jeff instead of being sent here to the minute book - I know he had a temp assisting him so that's probably where the hiccup occurred.  Would you please take your copy of the original and return the original to me.  Many thanks.  Best regards Kate

Kate B. Cole
Director, Corporate Services
Enron Corp.
Tel: (713) 853-1624
Fax: (713) 646-8007
Email: kate.cole@enron.com


FYI

---------------------- Forwarded by Sami Arap/SA/Enron on 04/04/2001 10:26 AM
---------------------------

Marcelo Parodi
04/04/2001 10:22 AM
To: Sami Arap/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: New contact at Enron Industrial Markets - Pulp & Paper

FYI

---------------------- Forwarded by Marcelo Parodi/SA/Enron on 04/04/2001
10:24 AM ---------------------------
From: Gustavo Junqueira/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/03/2001 04:29 PM CDT
To: Marcelo Parodi/SA/Enron@Enron, Idel Metzger/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Dirk Dimitry/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: New contact at Enron Industrial Markets - Pulp & Paper

Marcelo and Idel,

In light of my recent departure from Enron and its Forest Products Group, I
would like to inform that my responsibilities that include physical and
financial trading of pulp and paper products in South America will be
transferred to Mr. Dirk Dimitry in Houston. Mr. Dimitry has a long experience
in the pulp and paper industry and will be able to assist you and others in
the Sao Paulo office with Pulp and Paper transactions in South America. In
the next few weeks Mr. Dimitry will be contacting you to introduce himself
and make himself available for any assistance. He will also be scheduling a
trip to Brazil to meet with pulp and paper companies and discuss some new
opportunities.

I had the opportunity to brief Mr. Dimitry on all conversations that I had so
far with the Brazilian companies. Therefore I have included Mr. Dimitry
personal information in this email and would encourage you to give him a call
in case you have any questions.

Thank you again for the opportunity of working with you.

Gustavo Junqueira

Mr. Dirk Dimitry
1400 Smith Street, 29th Floor
Houston, TX 77002
Tel: (713) 345-4750
Fax: (713) 646-3253
email: Dirk.Dimitry@enron.com


?
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
																							[IMAGE]

																													[IMAGE]

																	Enerfax Daily

															[IMAGE]

																					[IMAGE]
																														[IMAGE]

																														[IMAGE]

																																						[IMAGE]
																															[IMAGE]

																											Looking  for a past article or issue. Click here to use Sagewave's  Search.

																										Enerfax  Daily? -? Page  ? -? November 9, 2000

																																		[IMAGE]

																															[IMAGE]

																																	Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 4? -?  November 9, 2000 -? ?  Past  Issues Available
on Sagewave

																																			[IMAGE]
																																							[IMAGE]
																																	[IMAGE]
																																				[IMAGE]
																																				[IMAGE]

																												(Continued from Page 4)

																												financial  strength and keep up with the 3%annual growth in Wisconsin's
electricity demand. The plan, pending regulatory approval, aims to  build at
least one 500 MW combined cycle natural gas-fired unit and  at least two 600
MW coal-fired units over the next decade, for a  total of 1,700 MW. More
units may be built after 2010, eventually  raising new generation capacity in
the state to around 3,000 MW.  Wisconsin Public Service also hopes to add to
the state's power grid  by building the Arrowhead-Weston line, a 250-mile 345
kilovolt  transmission line from Minnesota to central Wisconsin. The line
would directly link Wisconsin to power supplies in Canada and North  Dakota,
easing transmission bottlenecks to the west and south.  Wisconsin imports up
to 20% of its power.

																																[IMAGE]

																						Natural? Gas? Storage?  Report

																								[IMAGE]
																								[IMAGE]

																								? ? ? ? ? ? Week?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  Prev?
																								? ? ? ? ?  ?Ending? ? Prev? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ?Prev? ?  Year? ?
																								| Region | 11/03/00| Week | Diff | % Full | Year |  % Full
																								|  Prod? ?|? ?687? ?|? 667  |? 21? |? 72%? ?|? 852 |?  89%? ?
																								| East? ?|? 1678?  ?| 1660 |? 17? |? 91%? ?| 1721  |? 94%? ?
																								| West? ?|? ?383?  ?|? 385 |? -2? |? 76%?  ?|? 434 |? 86%? ?
																								|? ? ? ?  |? ? ? ? ?|? ? ?  |? ? ? |? ? ? ? |?  ? ? |? ? ? ?
																								| Total? |? 2748?  ?| 2712 |? 36? |? 83%? ?| 3007  |? 91%? ?

																								[IMAGE]

																								[IMAGE]

																																					[IMAGE]

																																						Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 7? -?  November 9, 2000

																																				[IMAGE]

																																					Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 8? -?  November 9, 2000

																																			[IMAGE]

																														Demand Exceeds BPA Supply BPA

																														? ? Customer demand under new 10-year wholesale  power contracts with the BPA
is so strong that the agency must  purchase power on the open market to
augment its supply. To recover  the cost of these purchases, it proposes to
tack a 15% charge onto  wholesale rates effective next October. Even with an
additional  charge, BPA's wholesale rates are still well below wholesale
market  prices currently forecast for the next five years on the West Coast.
BPA signed new wholesale contracts last week with more than 130  Northwest
utilities and industries for 10-years. Those agreements  pushed its total
firm energy load? up to 11,000 MW. That is  almost 3000 MW more than the
federal Columbia River Power System can  generate on a firm basis.

																																			[IMAGE]

																															Financial Summary

																																						[IMAGE]

																									")} TC
																			[IMAGE]

 - blnk.gif
 - img17.gif
 - img18.gif
 - img19.gif
 - img20.gif
 - img21.gif
 - img22.gif
 - img23.gif
 - img24.gif
 - img25.gif
 - img26.gif
 - img27.gif
 - img28.gif
 - img29.gif
 - img30.gif
 - img31.gif
 - img32.gif
 - img33.gif
 - img10.gif
 - img34.gif
 - id=1381847
 - img35.gif


what do mean "my boys" ? ....I thought you were going to the gym all those
times....


The report named: Violation/Notification Memo <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=60&report_name=Violation/Notification+Memo&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=09/27/2001>, published as of 09/27/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 3)

Publisher's Notes:

VaR was re-run for steel, reflecting a new deal which caused them to breach their limit


Joe Hunter has requested that in the future he be provided copies of all
confirmations in respect of any structured finance transactions in which we
participate.  To the extent we cannot quickly get executed versions, he would
like to receive the final draft versions.  I will discuss coordinating this
with Global Finance Legal during our Raptor process meeting next week.

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


There are 2 sheets in the following attachment that contain Enron transactional data for the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and Dynegy Direct, labeled as follows:
"Enron Activity - Dynegy Direct"
"Enron Activity - ICE"

Note: Total activity for Dynegy Direct is not available, therefore Enron's Percentage can not be calculated.

Let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Matt Motsinger
EnronOnline
713-853-5221

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


I am not sure I understand your second paragraph.  If PG&E reduces going-forward procurement costs to reflect FERC-ordered refunds, I do not understand why it would affect already-issued CTC charges.  The cost of power would be cheaper going forward.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:24 PM
To:	Comnes, Alan; Dasovich, Jeff; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; 'Jan Paul Acton (E-mail)'; Swain, Steve; Mara, Susan
Cc:	Alvarez, Ray
Subject:	RE: PG&E PX Credit Calculation -- CONFIDENTIAL ATTY CLIENT WORK PRODUCT

Thanks for the thoughts.  I fully agree on BF costs and DWR costs.  I believe that you are right on Est RT$ = CAISOM Imbalance, but I need to check.

On the question of retroactive ratemaking, it is my understanding that you are correct.  PG&E probably won't rebill, but will need to put in place an adjustment to the going forward PX Credit to "collect" the overpayment of Negative CTC.

All of this means that the impact of the FERC refund is less than 100c on the $ for the Negative CTC.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Comnes, Alan
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:35 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Dasovich, Jeff; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; 'Jan Paul Acton (E-mail)'; Swain, Steve; Mara, Susan
Cc:	Alvarez, Ray
Subject:	RE: PG&E PX Credit Calculation -- CONFIDENTIAL ATTY CLIENT WORK PRODUCT

I assume that if an hourly PX market clearing price is mitigated per a FERC order it would affect variable "HC" in the formula laid out in the attachment.

It is not clear to me which  variable represents hourly ISO imbalance energy costs, but I assume its "Est RT$".  If I am right, that variable would be affected by  the mitigated market price (MMP) for CAISO imbalance energy.

My comments are:

The FERC is able to only order refunds to jurisdictional entities and, given appeals, it may take years before the full extent of thre refunds are known.  Therefore there will be a significant difference between the change in the mitigated market price (MMP) as declared by FERC and the PX credit.  That is, a 10% reduction in the MMP should not be construed as having a 10% effect on the PX credit, assuming it can be recalculated at all.  Specifically, only some of the "HC" or  "Est RT$"  costs can  be adjusted per FERC refund orders.

Also, the PX credit is a tariffed rate.  I do not believe the PU code allows for retroactive adjustments to tariffed rates unless there was an explicit cost tracking account (e.g. a balancing A/C).  To my knowledge, no such account exists here.

Finally, I do not see a relationship between MMPs and (1) block forward costs on any date and (2) PG&E and/or DWR's procurement costs for the net short position post January 19.  So, those PX credit costs should be unaffected by any FERC refund order.

Alan Comnes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:22 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; Jan Paul Acton (E-mail); Swain, Steve; Mara, Susan; Comnes, Alan
Subject:	PG&E PX Credit Calculation

Attached is a summary of PG&E's notes on how they calculate the PX Credit (until January 19, 2001 when they hardwired $150/mwh).  We continue to try and get a handle on how the FERC Refund case will impact the PX Credit and Negative CTC.  If anyone has any issues or comments, please let me know.

Thanks.

Jim

 << File: PG&E PX Credit Calculation.doc >>


-----Original Message-----
From: navigator@nisource.com [mailto:navigator@nisource.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:49 AM
To: navigator@nisource.com
Subject: Critical,OTHER,20011020,COLUMBIA GULF,007854581,Sea Robin
(meter 481) Nominations - UPDATE

                       COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION COMPANY
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 19, 2001

Re:  Sea Robin (meter 481) Nominations - UPDATE
Notice ID: 3198
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

Columbia Gulf Transmission Company has been informed that the previously
reported scheduled maintenance work upstream of meter station 481 (Sea Robin -
Erath) has been completed and that the BTU now meets Columbia Gulf's
requirements.  Columbia Gulf is willing to accept nominations effective for the
gas day of October 20, 2001.


I w3ill take them over to your Mom's or leave them with Debbie.  If they are
not at your Mom's, they are at my house.


As you may have heard the approval has been given to pay all outstanding expense reports for CURRENT employees.  To facilitate the process, the ISC will begin on unblocking all outstanding items beginning on Wednesday.   We have obtained an active employee file from HR.  Please exclude the employee 6 series vendor numbers from your parameters when unblocking your payments for the next couple of days.  I will notify you when we are finished.  For the non-dip companies once we have paid all outstanding expense reports you will become the owners of these vendors as well.  For Dip companies, the ISC and travel management will continue to own this process until we have paid the terminated employee expenses as well.

For those of you who have contacted me directly with special requests, we will be processing or not processing according to your instructions.

Thanks for cooperation.

Sheila Howard
Integrated Solutions Center
Customer Care
713-345-5301


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000
09:46 AM ---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
10/23/2000 09:36 AM
To: Larry Gagliardi/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Unleaded Trade

Great news - keep them coming.
---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000
09:35 AM ---------------------------
From: Torrey Moorer on 10/20/2000 05:06 PM
To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leonardo
Pacheco/Corp/Enron@Enron, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc
Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motsinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Berzins/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lydia Cannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin
Rostant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Gagliardi/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Unleaded Trade

fyi,

Hats off to Larry Gagliardi and the Unleaded desk. They have done another
large crack-spread, this time for 100,000 barrels per month for calendar
2001. This trade notionally values out at over $40 million and is the second
largest transaction conducted to date on EOL.


whasssup?


I suggest you tell him to drop by around 2:15 for a 15 or 20 minute meeting.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harris, Stephanie J
Sent:	Monday, April 09, 2001 5:18 PM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	RE: Request to Meet

What time do you want to tell this guy he can come?  Do you want me to write to him?  THX, S

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harris, Stephanie J
Sent:	Monday, April 09, 2001 3:53 PM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	RE: Request to Meet

You've got yourself marked out for "PV".   BTW, I know tomorrow is a Tuesday, but I have moved Mr. McCartney several times and he has had conflicts and had to change also.  This is the only time.  He is coming at 9:00 a.m. tomorrow.  OK?  S

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Derrick Jr., James
Sent:	Monday, April 09, 2001 3:37 PM
To:	Harris, Stephanie J
Subject:	FW: Request to Meet

Steph, am I available on the 17th?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kisch <Victor@Tonkon.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Kisch+20+3CVictor+40Tonkon+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, April 09, 2001 12:05 PM
To:	jderric@enron.com
Cc:	michelle.cash@enron; Sullivan, Kriste; mkeyser@enron.com; Pais, Randy; rfreed@enron.com; Johnson, Rick; Butcher, Sharon;  Morgan
Subject:	Request to Meet

Mr. Derrick,

Our firm has been retained by Enron on a variety of matters over the last few years but we have not yet met.  I will be in your Houston offices on Tuesday, April 17th.  I am writing to ask if you would be available to meet sometime that afternoon.

You may recall meeting my partner, Mike Morgan, in Portland about three to four years ago.  Mike has worked with Enron on the PGE/Sierra deal and other matters as well.

I am the senior partner at our firm who specializes in labor and employment law.  I am a former partner at Littler Mendelson in San Francisco and continue to enjoy a close relationship with that firm.

I have been working with Rick Johnson, Director of Labor and Employment Relations at Enron Corp.  We have been handling the labor issues associated with an energy management agreement--Project Neon.  Rich Freed is lead counsel.  We are working on a project labor agreement in connection with the construction of a power plant--Project Epic.  Randy Pais is overseeing that matter.  We are also working with Marty Keyser on some potential  O & M issues at EFS.

On April 17th, I will be having lunch with Michelle Cash, Sharon Butcher, Kriste Sullivan and Rick.  In the morning I will be meeting with representatives of EFS, EES and EEOS.

My flight on the 17th leaves at about 5:30 pm.  Rick and I would be available to stop by your office sometime after lunch on the 17th.

Please let me know if you are available to meet with us.  I look forward to hearing from you.

Best regards,

Victor Kisch

________________________________

Victor J. Kisch
Attorney at Law
Tonkon Torp LLP
888 SW 5th Avenue
1600 Pioneer Tower
Portland, OR  97204
503.802.2032 -direct
503.972.3732 -fax
victor@tonkon.com
www.tonkon.com

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged,
confidential, and protected from disclosure.  If you are not the
intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is
strictly prohibited.  If you think you have received this e-mail message
in error, please e-mail the sender at victor@tonkon.com


SK - I forwarded this to the group too.  mm

The Southeast RTO orders are out and have followed through with what we
expected from the discussion at the FERC meeting.

The SPP and Entergy RTO proposals have been rejected because they fail to
satisfy the scope and configuration requirements of Order No. 2000.  The
Commission  notes that the required discussions between SPP and Entergy and
its neighboring RTO/TOs has led to no increase in the original scope and
configuration.  The filings by SPP and Entergy were brief, indicating only a
lack of interest by other RTOs or utilities in joining to enlarge scope; they
failed to specify any details of the talks, what changes could be made or
what could be fixed to accomodate combination with other RTOs.  The order
states that the Commission favors the development of large, regional
transmission organizations reflecting natural markets.  The Commission
indicates that they favor four RTOs - NE, SE, MW and West.  Therefore the
order requires the participants in SPP and Entergy to participate in
settlement discussions as set out in the mediation order.  Note that these
meetings will start next Tuesday, July 17 before a FERC ALJ.

The Southern Company RTO is also found by the FERC to fail the scope
characteristics of Order No. 2000.  The order finds that Southern's approach
to focus on MOUs and seams issues with its neighbors is inadequate.  The
order states, "We reiterate: the Commission's goal is to have a single RTO in
the Southeast, and to have that single RTO operational as soon as possible."
The Commission recognizes that start-up costs in forming a larger RTO may be
more, but that over the longer term, large RTOs will foster market
development, will provide increased reliability and will result in lower
wholesale electricity prices.  The order therefore directs the parties to the
mediation as stated above.

The Grid South participants are also directed to the mediation which is
starting on next Tuesday.  It is a lengthier order with more details on other
aspects of RTOs, including Independent Board requirement, congestion
managment, interconnection procedures, planning process and CBM.  Therefore,
I am attaching a summary of the order.  One of the important findings of the
order is that GridSouth is not sufficiently independent; the Applicant TOs
are making policy decisions that should be made by an independent board.
Therefore, the order requires GridSouth to install an independent board and
file a compliance filing within 90 days.

If anyone wants copies of the orders, let me know.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 10/27/2000
06:51 AM ---------------------------

Mark Schroeder@ECT
10/27/2000 05:00 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Energy Services Coaltion-Visit To London, Friday, December1

I guess because of the way the message was sent to me, I cannot include text
in return, but responding to your question of what does Joe's last comment
mean, presumably, it is that on these issues of WTO, I am not competent to
advise you on them.  Leaving that aside, I further suspect that he sees me as
the bette noir of the WTO ESC effort.  Finally, you might talk to Tom
Briggs.  I think Joe has stood Tom's position on its head.  Joe has argued
that we need to be in the ESC, because other things we care about like
financial services regulation and e-commerce will be implicated.  He says Tom
argues that we must liberalise energy to realise these objectives.  As I
understand Tom (and he can speak for himself), if we do not get energy
services liberalised (and the exclusion of third-party access is tantamount
to not getting energy services liberalised) then the make-weight arguments
about e-commerce and financial services fall away, at least as
props/arguments for continuing the ESC.    talk to you later today   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 10/27/2000
06:51 AM ---------------------------

Mark Schroeder@ECT
10/27/2000 05:06 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Energy Services

I had shared my note to you with Peter.  Thought you would find his reply
comment of interest.  Peter and I are both very frustrated/disappointed (you
probably knew that), but I think Joe knows it, too, which further explains
his derogatory comment about us in London.  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 27/10/2000
11:07 ---------------------------

Peter Styles
27/10/2000 10:36
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: RE: Energy Services

Raggett intervention likely attributable to Exxon again. I warned Joe and Bob
Fisher about their insidious influence in April when I went to Washington.
Also at that time Bob, Chris and I talked in detail about how to get TPA onto
agenda through a coda or ancillary agreement to basic service provision/
investment categorisation, as happened for telecom in GATS. Who took their
eye off the ball?

Mark Schroeder
10/24/2000 05:35 PM
To: Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: Energy Services

my note, and the attachment to which it refers, are self-explanatory, and
have obviously made me very unhappy.  What a waste of time and money by
Joe!   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 24/10/2000
16:36 ---------------------------

Mark Schroeder
24/10/2000 16:32
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Energy Services

Tom Briggs was good enough to forward to me a piece of correspondence that
Joe Hillings apparently shared with him.  My lack of enthusiasm for our WTO
initiative, I know, has hardly been masked, but, frankly, what is contained
in the incoming letter, below, I find quite disconcerting.  I have argued
that in our key markets, e.g., Europe, Japan, etc. (I am assuming we do not
need it in the USA, even today) the WTO initiative, i.e., liberalisation of
energy siervices, would be of little value by the time it was implemented.  I
had, apparently mistakenly, at least assumed that liberalisation of energy
siervices at a minimum meant third-party access to transmission networks.  If
not, then what the heck are we doing in this fight.  BUT, as you will see
from the incoming, below, when Paul Hennemeyer, of my team here in London,
joined Joe and Bob Fisher in Geneva to do a presentation on liberalisation of
energy services in WTO, it provoked a letter, to which Joe responded, saying
that the US Energy Services Coalition has NEVER taken a position on thrid
party access, and it is doubtful they could agree to such a position (Joe
agreed, and said this was just an Enron company position!).  You can probably
guess my position on this, but I thought I would forward this to you for your
information, and, if warranted, follow up, as the conversations we have had
have never led me to believe that either of you thought we were pursuing a
WTO initiative which did NOT involve third party access.   thanks  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 24/10/2000
16:03 ---------------------------
From: Tom Briggs@ENRON on 24/10/2000 06:49 CST
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: Energy Services

Mark and Paul:   It seems that Paul's enthustastic and brilliant presentation
may have upset a few people.  Oh dear.  If we continue to push TPA as a
prerequisite to energy services and trading, we might jeopardise the whole
WTO process.  Thanks.
----- Forwarded by Tom Briggs/NA/Enron on 10/24/2000 06:46 AM -----

	Joe Hillings
	10/24/2000 06:25 AM

		 To: Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, rcfisher@hillsandco.com,
don.deline@halliburton.com, cbcapstrat@aol.com,
tim.richards@corporate.ge.com, 75361.622@compuserve.com, Chris
Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Energy Services

Joe Hillings
Enron
1775 Eye Street, NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC  20006
202-466-9145
202-828-3372 (fax)
email:  jhillin@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron on 10/24/2000 08:23 AM -----

	Joe Hillings
	10/24/2000 05:15 AM

		 To: "Raggett, Brian" <Brian.Raggett@ogp.be>
		 cc: "'Joe.hillings@, "Arscott, Lyn"<lyn.arscott, Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron,
Bob Fisher, Brian Petty, Tim Richards, Don Deline, Christina Bolton, Chris
Long/Corp/Enron,
		 Subject: RE: Energy Services

Joe Hillings
Enron
1775 Eye Street, NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC  20006
202-466-9145
202-828-3372 (fax)
email:  jhillin@enron.com

Brian: Thank you for your thoughtful and complete statement of the issue. The
ESC has not taken any position on the regulatory details of market access nor
advocated any such as Third Party Access although Enron certainly has taken a
public position at the EU and other venues preferring TPA but willing to be
practical about  the issue. I greatly appreciate your cutting through to the
concern. It is helpful and hopefully will help us in future presentations; I
know it will help me.

Regards,

Joe

	"Raggett, Brian" <Brian.Raggett@ogp.be>
	10/24/2000 04:50 AM

		 To: "'Joe.hillings@enron.com'" <Joe.hillings@enron.com>
		 cc: "Arscott, Lyn" <lyn.arscott@ogp.org.uk>
		 Subject: RE: Energy Services

Joe:

Having raised the matter covered by the exchange of e-mails between yourself
and Lyn, I feel I should clarify my observations of the meeting at the WTO.

I am confident that the WTO representatives were better informed and
enlightened by the presentations given by the ESC. I am sure they were also
struck, as was I, by Paul's enthusiastic explanation of the range of
innovative energy services offered by Enron. What sparked my concern was the
reference to access to energy networks.

Personally, I do not and, more importantly, nor does OGP take a position on
TPA in the EU, to which you refer in your communication. Even more so in the
context of the WTO, because it has never been discussed. I surmise though,
that other ESC members would have similar  reservations. My concerns were
heightened by questions on the subject raised by one or two of our
interlocutors. This part of the discussion then broadened somewhat and
included information about a court case in Germany to overcome entrenched
opposition to TPA by certain network operator(s). I know not whom.

I believe it would be a pity if the broader aspects of energy services,
supported generally by the ESC became subsumed by a debate on TPA , to
either nationally or privately owned networks, to which some WTO governments
outside Europe and the United States, maybe opposed.

While I detected concerns about this in the questions asked, I don't think
that the baby was thrown away with the bath-water. It is my view, however,
that the ESC should be cautious about raising an issue which some
governments  may perceive to be outside what they think is a more reasonable
agenda, and to which, rightly or wrongly, they have antipathy.  My concern
is that this may then  be used to forestall  the worthy and, perhaps, more
achievable objectives of  the ESC to include  the wide range of services
advocated, in the main, by Paul and by the others who presented.

I  most certainly have a positive view on the value of your work and I hope
this helps.

I am not sure at this point whether I will be available to join you in
London but I am planning to attend the  conference on November 27 and I look
forward to meeting you and Bob once again.

Kind regards,

Brian

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Arscott, Lyn [SMTP:Lyn.Arscott@ogp.org.uk]
 Sent: 23 October 2000 18:02
 To: Raggett, Brian
 Subject: FW: Energy Services

 FYI

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Joe.Hillings@enron.com [mailto:Joe.Hillings@enron.com]
 Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 4:53 PM
 To: Lyn.Arscott@ogp.org.uk
 Subject: RE: Energy Services

 Joe Hillings
 Enron
 1775 Eye Street, NW
 Suite 800
 Washington, DC  20006
 202-466-9145
 202-828-3372 (fax)
 email:  jhillin@enron.com

 Lynn: Thank you for your response. Bob Fisher and I look forward to
meeting
 you, Brian Raggett and possibly others in London on Friday, December
1. We
 will be pleased to host lunch and would be grateful if you could
select the
 restaurant. Should another time be more convenient with you, please
let me
 know.

 From your response regarding the comment in Geneva, I am not feeling
that I
 addressed the specifics of your concern so at the risk of prolonging
the
 pain I'll make another stab at a response. If the concern centers on
 liberalization of transmission access for electricity and natural
gas, I
 would respond that we want to see the EU electricity and natural gas
 directives fully implemented. The EU had asked member countries to
fully
 implement transmission access and it is being accomplished in a
phased in
 approach. Some member countries are doing it in a way that makes
energy
 services possible, some to a less degree and so far, France has not
adopted
 the implementing legislation which is a subject of concern to the
EU.

 The opening up of markets to the maximum degree possible is a broad
goal of
 the Energy Services Coalition recognizing that this is a position
that has
 to be negotiated. We have not recommended any specific regulatory
system or
 regime.

 If I am still missing your concern, please bear with me and bring me
in
 closer to any concern that you may have.

 Regards and best wishes.

 Joe

                     Lora Sullivan

                                          To:     Joe
 Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON
                     10/23/2000           cc:

                     11:35 AM             Subject:     RE: Energy
Services

 Lora Sullivan
 Federal Government Affairs Representative
 Enron
 1775 Eye Street, NW
 Suite 800
 Washington, DC  20006
 202-466-9142
 202-828-3372 (fax)
 email:  lsulliv@enron.com
 ----- Forwarded by Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron on 10/23/2000 11:35 AM
-----

                     "Arscott, Lyn"

                     <Lyn.Arscott@o        To:
 "'Lora.Sullivan@enron.com'"
                     gp.org.uk>            <Lora.Sullivan@enron.com>

                                           cc:     "Raggett, Brian"
 <Brian.Raggett@ogp.be>
                     10/23/2000            Subject:     RE: Energy
Services

                     11:11 AM

 Joe,
      I am sorry that you were unable to telephone but I know the
reason.
 Our system has been down for upgrading. We had to expand our
bandwidth to
 accommodate the modern volume of email telephone line traffic.
Sorry.
      In response to your itinerary, I will be in town on Dec 1. I
will
 ask Brian Raggett to join us if he can and we can see if there is
any one
 else. The issue that arose at the last meeting in Geneva seems to
center
 around the special problems  of inclusion of pipelines and
electrical lines
 as part of energy services.
      Brian Raggett was at the Geneva meeting and has a first hand
 interpretation of the meeting.

           Lyn

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Lora.Sullivan@enron.com [mailto:Lora.Sullivan@enron.com]
 Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 3:51 PM
 To: Lyn.Arscott%ogp.org.uk.@enron.com
 Subject: Energy Services

                     Joe Hillings

                                          To:     Joe
 Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON
                     10/23/2000           cc:
75361.622@compuserve.com,
 Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
                     10:25 AM             Subject:     Energy
Services

 Joe Hillings
 Enron
 1775 Eye Street, NW
 Suite 800
 Washington, DC  20006
 202-466-9145
 202-828-3372 (fax)
 email:  jhillin@enron.com

 Lynn: I have been unable to get through on your telephone line this
morning
 so will attempt to fax this and accompanying message to you as
recommended
 by Brian Petty.

 If it is not fully responsive to the questions raised regarding our
 presentation to the WTO in Geneva, please feel free to contact me.
Neither
 the ESC nor Enron advocates any abregation of contract. Further, the
ESC
 has not specifically advocated any regulatory system and has no
plans to do
 so. We do advocate and advance as much market access as we can get
for
 companies providing energy services.

 Bob Fisher (Hills and Company) and I plan to be in Brussels for the
 European Services Federation conference on Monday, November 27th and
I have
 been invited to partipate on a panel which I have accepted.  Bob and
I are
 then planning to travel to Germany, Oslo and London to meet with any
energy
 industry people interested in meeting with us to discuss the energy
 services effort.

 Monday, Nov. 27 Brussels Conference (We hope Brian Raggett can
participate)
 Tuesday, Nov. 28 calls on EC
 Wednesday, Nov. 29 meeting in Dusseldorf/Essen with industry people
 (planning stage)
 Thursday, Nov. 30 meetings in Oslo with industry people (planning
stage)
 Friday, December 1 meetings in London (Can we have lunch with you
and do
 you want us to meet with others)?
 Satuday, December 2 depart for Washington

 Please let us know if Friday will work for you and how you advise we
should
 proceed. We would also like to meet with British Electric Assn and
possibly
 someone in DTI.

 Joe