Do you want John Goodpasture involved in this meeting?

---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 02/17/2000
07:40 AM ---------------------------

Ron Tapscott@ECT
02/17/2000 07:37 AM
To: Cvwaits@cmsenergy.com, jcbaker@aep.com, Sfszwed@firstenergycorp.com,
glenn_ross@vapower.com, welchj@dteenergy.com
cc: Randal T Maffett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dwight
Larson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Next Meeting and Other

Gentlemen,

I have attached a file (titled -- Chart 021500.doc) that outlines some of the
issues related to organizational structure, governance, etc. of the joint
venture.  I would like to discuss some of the points as it relates to the
"Alliance" compliance filing planned for the end of this week.  I want to
make sure that  we are all working under the same assumptions as it applies
to the JV.  Could you please call me so we could discuss before the formal
filing.  In addition, I would like to suggest a short discussion on the
procedure you plan on following during the rehearing and compliance filing
steps.

Furthermore, I want to confirm the agenda items for the next meeting (see
below).

Agenda for the 29th is as follows (and in order of appearance):
Enron presents synergy, growth and financial opportunities (including impact
on earnings and market value)
pipes to pipes
pipes to wires
Alliance presents synergy, growth and financial opportunities (including
impact on earnings and market value)
wires to wires
Outline Joint Venture Structural Form.  We would like to discuss in detail
and will provide a handout at the meeting.  The discussion will include:
type and timing of contribution (stock or asset)
governance
type of ownership (passive and active)
Valuation (this will require participation from Financial or Corporate
Development areas of your respective organizations)
Agree on Process
Agree on Method
Timing

Participants from Enron will be --

Stan Horton (Chairman & CEO of GPG)
Mark Metts (Exec. VP Enron Corp. -- Corporate Development)
Rod Hayslett (Sr. VP of GPG)
Randy Maffett (VP -- ENA)
Dwight Larson (VP -- Corporate Development)
Ron Tapscott (Director -- ENA)

We will want to know who will participate on each entities behalf as well.
Last, when can we expect the top financials for the Alliance?  You had
indicated this would be forthcoming on or before Feb. 21.

Thanks, Ron.


Barry, I understand you have some reservations about my involvement with L-P's request for assistance to financially hedge their natural gas exposure.  I have no problem working with Dave Fuller as I did regarding another entity or with whomever from your group regarding this matter, as long as I am financially rewarded for my time and efforts.  As you will see for the attached letter from L-P, I have put a great deal of time and effort into positioning Enron as L-P's preferred ESP to the point of being asked to join their internal energy team.  If you would please advice me how you'd like to proceed and we'll take it from there.  Thanks,  John

 - John M Energy Team Request.doc


As some of you have heard, I have gotten back into the energy business.  I
finished my work in the private equity world with IGP and recently started
with Reliant Resources, the unregulated merchant business of Reliant
Energy.  The company is scheduled to IPO the first week in February with a
distribution of remaining shares some ten months later.  It's a great
challenge to build a business in the face of the upcoming electricity
deregulation in Texas.  For some of my Enron friends that were around when
ECT started trading power and really started growing, the challenge is very
similar.  I'm looking forward to it and I think it will be a lot of fun.

I'm head of a group called Transaction Development & Support focusing
primarily on the large C&I customers.  This group will be responsible for
structuring (that overused word again) deals, keeping the originators
focused on the proper segments of the market, getting the deals sold out
the back door and then tracking the remaining portfolio.

My new contact info is:

tel - 713.207.3170
cell - 713.898.9481
james_r_easter@reliantenergy.com

Now... for those of you looking for a good stock tip and who isn't, I would
strongly advise shorting Starbucks.  As I will no longer be consuming vast
quantities of overpriced latte while digesting the daily Arts section of
the New York Times, I fear for their ongoing viability.

Stay in touch and best wishes to you and your families for the Holidays.

Jim


Kimat, I copied Sep forward on deal 202939 to deal 380571 and changed the
counterparty to new power.


Steve filled in the detail for me on the LG&E issue mentioned in the Law
bullets this morning.  A valve was left open between an LG&E facility and
Northern for an approximate 3 month period (I'm not sure how recent).  LG&E's
gas loss data indicates that the amount of gas that inadvertently got into
Northern was approx. 180,000 MMBtu, with a value of about $500,000.   Rockey
and Steve have talked to LG&E and it does not appear that we have any good
arguments for avoiding the liability.  The unexpected (and unmetered)
deliveries from LG&E presumably reduced our lost and unaccounted for balance
during the referenced 3 month period.  Accordingly, I assume the cost of
replacing that gas should be accounted for in Northern's PRA and so should
not affect earnings.   I'm not sure what the timetable is for resolving this
matter.  DF


fyi: this is rather out of the ordinary for S&P
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Conwell, Wendy
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 10:08 AM
To: Bradford, William S.; Ngo, Tracy; Tribolet, Michael
Subject: S&P News on California

   Research: Return to Regular Format  California Power Crisis: Bring In the
Feds        Publication Date: 30-Mar-2001 Analyst: Todd A Shipman, CFA, New
York (1) 212-438-7676

		     In one of the Sherlock Holmes stories, the key clue in solving the
mystery was a dog that did not bark. In a similar vein, as analysts analyze
and experts pontificate on the electricity crisis in California, as well as
its causes and solutions, there seems to be an obvious point that few, if
any, are mentioning. That is, that the problem is not really confined to
California, but is at the very least a regional issue and, in reality, is
tied to a national industry.    As such, the whole question of the current
and future direction of electricity deregulation is a federal matter with
important economic, environmental, and even national security implications,
and therefore Standard & Poor's believes it ought to be addressed at the
federal level. Instead, just like the dog that did not bark, no one in
Washington, D.C. seems to be willing to step in and take the lead in
resolving the California crisis, or the bigger issue of electric
restructuring.    This state versus federal jurisdictional issue did arise in
early discussions of electric deregulation, and there were some calls for a
larger role by the federal government. But the states were able to protect
their long-standing place as the primary regulators of the electric industry,
and so Congress and the FERC backed off, and let the states take the lead in
directing the restructuring of the electric utility industry, even though
they started the whole deregulation ball rolling with the Energy Policy Act
of 1992. The establishment of the act contrasted greatly with the
introduction of more competition into utility industries overseas, and the
natural gas industry here in the U.S., where a more centralized approach was
taken.    After some sporadic attempts by Congress to address some electric
utility issues, they seemed to have given up trying to fashion a
comprehensive solution to deregulation of the electric utility industry.
Their inaction is echoed nicely by the desultory and curiously laissez-faire
attitude displayed by the FERC, where even something as important and clearly
jurisdictional as the transmission grid has been handled with all the speed
and dispatch of a tortoise race.    Why should the administration or Congress
(both, ironically, in the hands of Republicans) presume to step in and usurp
the states? As the situation in California has revealed, the electric
industry is very much connected, both figuratively and literally, and the
actions of one state can and most likely will affect its neighbors. In other
words, California sneezed and the rest of the western grid caught the cold.
And it is not just the initial design of the restructuring scheme that can
lead to lower credit quality and other problems. In California, we were
treated to the spectacle of that state steadfastly refusing to timely deal
with its problems (the Public Utilities Commission only last week belatedly
raised retail rates) while the rest of its neighbors were forced to pass
through significant rate hikes to keep their own utilities whole to deal with
price spikes caused partly by California. Despite the increases, the
situation has had negative implications for the credit ratings of several of
those utilities.    The precedent for a strong federal role, and a good
analogy as well, is securities regulation. The prominent, and almost
exclusive role of the federal SEC in monitoring and regulating the securities
industry came about in the 1930s, after the severe economic downturn that was
preceded by the Crash of 1929. It was recognized that despite the presence of
state regulators, the nature of the industry and the need for uniformity
across the nation meant that Washington had to get involved and take the
lead. The banking industry is another example of where the economic stakes
are high, and a nationwide perspective is needed to protect the common
good.    We are faced with the same type of situation with electric
utilities. The California crisis has shown us that strong and active
oversight is needed, a comprehensive approach to both the restructuring and
the subsequent degree of regulation must be taken, and that the states are
not willing or capable of organizing their activities to achieve the
necessary coordination. The initiative should now come from either the Bush
administration or Congress to take control of the process, and develop a
thorough plan for industry restructuring.             Copyright , 1994-2001
Standard & Poor's. All Rights Reserved.  Privacy Policy


Attached is my summary of the requests for rehearing of FERC's July 12, 2001 orders in the Northeastern RTO proceedings.  If you would like any further information, please let me know.

Susan Lindberg
713.853.0596


During our United Way 2000 Campaign that was held last fall, you were kind enough to pledge a contribution to the United Way. Our records indicate that your preference was to pay by check.  If you have already paid your contribution, thank you!  If you have not, we wanted to provide you with the information that you need in order to send in your contribution.

All checks should be made out to the United Way of the Texas Gulf Coast.  They can be sent interoffice mail in a confidential envelope to the attention of Zulie Flores, EB 1612.  If for some reason, you do not know the amount that you pledged, you can call Zulie at
3-3908 and she will be able to assist you.

We had such a successful campaign last year and it was due in large part to your generosity.  Thank you for your support of this very important program - you did make a difference!


Hello everyone.  It is time for the Spring recruiting season to begin and
select the candidates we would like to have on our pre-select list. My
coordinator  will be handing out the resume books this morning. Please call
Alyse at extension 57339 with your EB locations so we can be sure to get the
resume books to you. Please email me your top 10 picks by noon, Friday,
January 26th.  Thank you for your continued support and I look forward to
working with you all this season.

Kristin Gandy
Associate Recruiter
Associate / Analyst Program

amh


Thank you.

"Zane Cooper" <zcooper@Haas.Berkeley.EDU> on 08/29/2000 03:39:47 PM
Please respond to <zcooper@Haas.Berkeley.EDU>
To: "Jeff Dasovich" <jdasovic@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE:

Jeff:

I removed you from the Izio InfoPier E262A-1 course.

Zane

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Dasovich [mailto:jdasovic@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 11:19 AM
To: zcooper@Haas.Berkeley.EDU
Subject:

Greetings.  Just wanted to let you know that I've dropped Product
Management,
E262A-1.  So I can be removed from the list.  Thank you.


??? To the kind  attention
?
Mr Kennet Lay
?
Would you please to be informed that our company's telephone  numbers, Via S.
Nicola da
?
Tolentino 1/5, Rome, will  change since the 5 Dec 2000
?
?
Centralino???????? +39 06 42 17  01
?
Interni:  ?????????????  +39 06 42 17 0- 208
???????????  ????????????????????????????????????-210?
?

Best regards
?
Franco BernabS & C.  S.p.A.
?
?


Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

Midday Market View(TM) for Wednesday, June 6, 2001
as of 1:00PM EDT
Information provided by Standard & Poor's

================================================================

U.S. INDICES
(1:00p.m. EDT)

----------------------------------
Market            Value     Change

DJIA          11,106.60    - 69.20
Nasdaq Comp.   2,224.52     - 9.14
S&P 500        1,274.18     - 9.39
----------------------------------
NYSE Advancing Issues        1,158
NYSE Declining Issues        1,756
NYSE Trading Volume        567 mln
NASDAQ Advancing Issues      1,406
NASDAQ Declining Issues      2,134
NASDAQ Trading Volume     1.05 bln

==================================

U.S. TREASURIES
----------------------------------
Value            Yield      Change

1-year bill       3.55%        n/a
5-year note       4.83%     - 3/32
10-year note      5.27%       unch
30-year bond      5.65%     + 3/32

The tables above look best when viewed in a fixed-width font,
such as "Courier."

================================================================

U.S. TRADING SUMMARY

Stocks vacillated this morning around unchanged levels before
falling into negative territory. An earnings warning from
Hewlett-Packard took the wind out of buyers' sails as the NASDAQ
quickly headed south. Both the Dow and S&P 500, weak from the
start of the session, erased almost all of their gains from
Tuesday as they extended their losses. Traders continued to worry
about the health of the economy and decided that taking profits
after the recent stock market run-up was the better choice.

----------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. TREASURY SUMMARY

Almost all maturities of Treasuries were lower at midday.
However, stock market weakness has provided some support. The
profit-taking began in the overnight session in Asia and
continued through this morning's open in the U.S. Economic data
remained nonexistent, so traders were forced to rely on
vacillations in the equity market and technical analysts to help
guide them through the illiquid session. By midday, shorter- and
middle-dated issues were in the red while longer-dated issues
managed to climb out of negative territory.

----------------------------------------------------------------

CURRENCY SUMMARY

The British pound sterling has led the way to across-the-board
dollar gains. Worries that a re-elected Labour government would
make an early push for European Monetary Union entry has provided
the catalyst for sterling selling. A report in the U.K.
Independent that Labour would push for an early referendum, later
denied by Prime Minister Tony Blair, helped fuel the panic
sterling selling, which spilled over into other European
currencies. Moreover, worries over upcoming European data and
ongoing European Central Bank policy credibility issues have also
weighed on the euro, pushing the common currency to session lows
versus the dollar. Meanwhile, the dollar is holding firm just
above 120 yen.

----------------------------------------------------------------

MAJOR COMPANY / INDUSTRY NEWS
(All prices as of 1:05 p.m. EDT)

** Hewlett-Packard (HWP: 28.97, - 1.08) announced that sales in
its latest fiscal quarter may be weaker than the company
anticipated. Hewlett-Packard stated that slow corporate spending
had spread beyond the United States and Europe and now is a
threat to the firm's sales in Latin America and Asia. Further
cost-cutting measures will be put into effect, but the tech giant
did not give details.

** British Airways (BAB: 53.00, - 1.05) and AMR Corp.'s (AMR:
38.15, - 0.01) American Airlines have restarted talks in order to
revive their previous discussions about a joint venture,
according to the Financial Times. To determine what conditions
could be imposed on the duo, the two have begun speaking with
regulators in Brussels, London and Washington. Both airlines are
looking to gain approval for the venture in order to share
revenues and profits on transatlantic services. Original talks
began five years ago for the same type of venture, but the plans
were shelved when both airlines were unwilling to give up 300
highly prized takeoff and landing spots at London's Heathrow
airport.

** Newport News Shipbuilding (NNS: 64.00, - 0.34) announced that
it has reaffirmed its backing of General Dynamics' (GD: 78.13, -
1.99) takeover bid. General Dynamics and Newport News officials
are expected to meet with the Justice Department and Pentagon
officials today in order to discuss details of the potential
merger. Newport News said that General Dynamics' bid offers
better value than the unsolicited bid by Northrop Grumman (NOC:
89.59, - 0.65).

** Circuit City Stores (CC: 15.54, - 0.27) now expects a profit
instead of a loss in the fiscal first quarter due to strong
revenues from its CarMax Auto Group (KMX: 15.19, - 1.26). The
electronics chain stated that it should post a profit of $0.04
per share, which is a welcome deviation from the $0.03 per share
loss most analysts had expected.

----------------------------------------------------------------

RESEARCH SPOTLIGHTS

** Lehman Brothers upgraded shares of Procter & Gamble (PG:
65.44, + 1.36) from a market performer to a buy rating.

** Wells Fargo Van Kasper upgraded shares of Sycamore Networks
(SCMR: 11.30, - 0.25) from a buy to a strong buy rating.

** Goldman Sachs upgraded USX-U.S. Steel Group (X: 21.00, - 0.74)
from a market under-performer to a market performer rating.

################################################################

Log in using the links below to:

Access your account:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=CCBodyi&NeedCASelValue=Y

View your Email Alert customization options:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

Perform research or request a market quote:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=Quotes

Place a trade order:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=TradeStock

To visit Schwab's home page, use this link:
http://www.schwab.com/

-----------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe or modify your Email Alert customization options,
log in using the link below or copy and paste it into your
browser's address window:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

Now you can receive graphics Email Alerts in HTML format,
using helpful, full-color graphics and active Web links that
connect you directly to information you want. Use the link
below to log in and change your email format preference:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAEditEmailAddr

----------------------------------------------------------------

Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
email system may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed
by Schwab personnel. (1000-8752)

Copyright 2001 Standard & Poor's MMS Inc.  All rights reserved.
Standard & Poor's MMS services are for personal use only.
Commercial use or redistribution in any form, print or
electronic, is prohibited.
Distribution by Quris, Inc.


i can't remember if i sent these to you guys or not

 >"You Were an Accident!"
> > >
> > >"Strangers Have the Best Candy"
> > >
> > >"The Little Sissy Who Snitched"
> > >
> > >"Some Kittens Can Fly!"
> > >
> > >"Getting More Chocolate on Your Face"
> > >
> > >"Where Would You Like to Be Buried?"
> > >
> > >"Kathy Was So Bad Her Mom Stopped Loving Her"
> > >
> > >"The Attention Deficit Disorder Association's Book of Wild Animals of
> > >North Amer... Hey!  Let's Go Ride Our Bikes!"
> > >
> > >"All Dogs Go to Hell!"
> > >
> > >"The Kids' Guide to Hitchhiking"
> > >
> > >"When Mommy and Daddy Don't Know the Answer They Say 'God Did It'"
> > >
> > >"Garfield Gets Feline Leukemia"
> > >
> > >"What Is That Dog Doing to That Other Dog?"
> > >
> > >"Why Can't Mr. Fork and Ms. Electrical Outlet Be Friends?"
> > >
> > >"Bi-Curious George"
> > >
> > >"Daddy Drinks Because You Cry"
> > >
> > >"Mister Policeman Eats His Service Revolver"
> > >
> > >"You Are Different and That's Bad"
> > >
> > >"Dad's New Wife... Timothy"
> > >
> > >"Pop!  Goes The Hamster (and Other Great Microwave Games)"
> > >
> > >"Testing Homemade Parachutes With Nothing At All But Your Household
> > Pets"
> > >
> > >"The Hardy Boys, the Barbie Twins and the Vice Squad"
> > >
> > >"The Tickling Babysitter"
> > >
> > >"Babar Meets the Taxidermist"
> > >
> > >"Curious George and the High-Voltage Fence"
> > >
> > >"The Boy Who Died from Eating All His Vegetables"
> > >
> > >"Start a Real-Estate Empire With the Change From Your Mom's Purse"
> > >
> > >"The Pop-up Book of Human Anatomy"
> > >
> > >"Things Rich Kids Have, But You Never Will!"
> > >
> > >"The Care Bears Maul Some Campers and are Shot Dead"
> > >
> > >"How to Become The Dominant Military Power In Your Elementary School"
> > >
> > >"Controlling the playground: Respect through Fear"
> >
>


- ARPA1.txt
 - TheyCaug.jpg


i bet you could teach me something huh?


I need to get the indexes for new options as soon as possible.  Please let me know if you need more information.

Thanks,
Dawn
---------------------- Forwarded by Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001 05:05 PM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
04/11/2001 02:30 PM
To:	George Huan/Enron@EnronXGate, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Indices in Test

Larry May has requested the indexes listed below to be added to EOL for his options.  Can you please provide the indexes that need to be mapped in tagg for them to bridge correctly (i.e. the spot and firm reference)

Thanks for your help.
Dawn
---------------------- Forwarded by Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 02:23 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.  From:  Kevin Meredith @ ENRON                           04/11/2001 01:53 PM

To:	Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	Indices in Test

Here are the new indices for Larry May's floating strike options that I have built in test.

Option-GD/D Chi - NGI Chi
Option-GD/D HSC - IF HSC
Option-GD/D Kern Opal - IF NWPL RkyMtn
Option-GD/D PEPL - IF PEPL
Option-GD/D Perm - IF Perm
Option-GD/D TCO - IF TCO
Option-GD/D EP SJ - IF EP SJ

Let me know what else you may need.
Thanks.
Kevin


Dandy.  Thanks so much.  What's the address of the W?

Best,
Jeff


Gauarav:
FYI.
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 11:55 AM -----

	"SCOTT AVITABILE" <SAVITABI@LLGM.COM>
	06/01/2000 11:46 AM

		 To: <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Ace Insurance Policy

Carol:  My mistakes.  John McGreevy is actually jmcgreev@llgm.com, and Sam
Behrends is actually sbehrend@llgm.com.   I will forward your email to them.


Thanks for taking care of this!  Sorry if I caused any confusion.

	From:  Sheila Glover                           05/11/2000 11:37 AM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron Corp Swap

Mark,
Gary Hickerson authorized payment amount based upon supporting calculation of
expected proceeds from Jill Erwin. Faxed to CSFB now.
Sheila


I would like to further clarify our interpretation of what happend on this
particular deal, just so that all the Enron people understand the
circumstances leading up to our losing access to these agreements.

Here's my summary/understanding of what happened:
The transportation contracts for IP/Union Camp were listed on the Exhibit
between CES and ENA as assets ENA would have rights to through March 2001.
We had an agreement with CES that if any parties would not sign agency or
assignment letters on any deals, we would paper the deal through CES, but
would still have access to the contracts.  We understood that all assets
listed on the Exhibits were assets CES owned or controlled for the term
designated on those Exhibits.

Apparently on this particular contract, CES didn't own or control the assets
for the term--they expected to continue to be the supplier past March 2000,
when its fuel supply agreement with IP ends.  However, IP adamantly refused
to allow Enron to step into CES' shoes, and elected to designate a new fuel
supplier effective April 1.  IP also controls its own transportation
agreements and those are being assigned by IP to its new supplier effective
April 1.  Consequently, ENA has no further rights and/or obligations on the
IP/Union Camp agreements past March 2000.

For Feb and March, we need to go ahead and nominate on CES' behalf, even
though IP refuses to sign any agency arrangements.  This means we really
should have a transition employee do this particular nomination--I'll leave
it up to Joan V. how to manage this.   If you have any questions, please
advise.

kjames@columbiaenergygroup.com on 02/17/2000 09:51:26 AM
To: " - *Lombardo, Fred" <flombar@columbiaenergygroup.com>
cc: " - *Joan.Veselack@enron.com" <Joan.Veselack@enron.com>, " - *Flewellyn,
Melissa" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Lombardo, Fred"
<flombar@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com"
<Chris.Germany@enron.com>, " - *Scott.Goodell@enron.com"
<Scott.Goodell@enron.com>, " - *Colleen.Sullivan@enron.com"
<Colleen.Sullivan@enron.com>
Subject: Re: International Paper/Union Camp - PLEASE READ

Fred and everyone else on the string of E-mails I received:

OK - since I received numerous copied and forwarded E-mails on this
International Paper issue, I felt it best to copy everyone.  As I understand
what is going on -  CES has an obligation to deliver gas to International
Paper
through March, 2000.  I agree with Colleen that CES is obligated by the terms
of our agreement to purchase this gas from Enron through March, 2000.  As far
as the Energy Management functions, these duties are not part of the Enron
Retail contract.

The real problem that has arisen with International Paper is that they have
some ill feelings towards Enron for some reason.  We have attempted to smooth
this over but it appears that the gentleman at International Paper has a big
burr in his saddle that I nor anyone at CES can remove.  International Paper
refuses to execute any paperwork required by the pipelines to allow Enron to
nominate gas.  Since this is such a short term deal, I would recommend that a
CES transition employee nominate the gas and work out the logistics with Enron
to get the gas to International Paper and keep them happy.  Whatever CES and
Enron need to do from an accounting standpoint to make sure Enron is made
whole
can be handled fairly easily I would assume.

As far as business after March, 2000, International Paper has no obligation to
purchase gas from CES.  So if they do not purchase gas from CES, then Enron
will not be affected after March 2000.  If International Paper does execute an
extension to their gas purchase agreement or enter into a new purchase
agreement then we will definitely need to get this agency problem worked out.
Please feel free to call me at 713-693-2552 should any of you have any
questions regarding the foregoing.  Thank you.

Kendrick


Do you have a copy of Maureen's deal ticket?
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000 10:58
AM ---------------------------

Elizabeth L Hernandez
09/08/2000 09:58 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bay State

Do you know if we should be charging a demand on deal 233091.  Please let me
know.

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT on
09/08/2000 09:57 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shawna Johnson @ ENRON                           09/05/2000 11:30 AM

To: Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bay State

Elizabeth,

This is an East deal.

By the way, thank you so much again for your help during my vacation.  I have
just reviewed my e-mails and saw that you have been quite busy!!  Thank you
so much for  your quick response to settlelments and client services needs.

 :  )
smj
---------------------- Forwarded by Shawna Johnson/Corp/Enron on 09/05/2000
11:22 AM ---------------------------

Isabel Y Resendez@ECT
09/05/2000 10:40 AM
To: Shawna Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Bay State

Shawna,
I am Isabel and I work in Gas Settlements.  Could you help me out with the
following?

Deal # 233091 for Bay State is charging a demand charge every month.
Accourding to Bay State Enron should not be charging demand charges.  Could
you let me know if this correct.  Should Enron be charging demand charges?
Maureen Smith is down as the trader on the deal.  However, I am not sure if
that is correct.  Please let me know if you are not the correct person to
send this note too.
Thank you for your help!
isabel
3-0440


Carlos,

Please, forward their resumes to us and we shall set up an interview for them.

Vince

carlos ordonez <ordonez@shasta.phys.uh.edu> on 11/21/2000 09:30:08 AM
To: Stinson.Gibner@enron.com
cc: vkamins@enron.com
Subject: Re: Greetings

Dear Vincent and Stinson,

Both my students would love to come visit you guys for an informal
visit in the near future. Please let me know well ahead of time
when they can come. If possible, see to it that their parking expenses
be paid when they do come.

I'll be in touch with you all over the next months about this and
a possible postdoctoral/trainee agreement (World Lab.).

Cheers,

Carlos


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Alma-XKR Meeting (Tammy Hopkins, Donna Scott, Jerry M, Tammy J, Dan, John & Jim S.)

Date:		8/31/2000
Time:		3:00 PM - 4:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Detailed Description:


We have 4 of each of these available at $19 (or whatever face value is).
Just let me know what you want to do.

Thanks,

Kay

Carolyn George
01/23/2001 02:08 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Rodeo Tickets

The performances I am interested in are:

Clay Walker
Destiny's Child
Leanne Womak

Thanks,

Carolyn George
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Enron Wholesale Services
Enron Industrial Markets LLC
1400 Smith, EB3836A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-3439    Fax:  (713) 646-3393
email:  carolyn.george@enron.com


FYI.  CDWR bond and purchase info.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 06/22/2001
07:44 PM ---------------------------
From: Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/22/2001 09:04 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Mellencamp/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: DWR presentation (see page 11)


Vector Pipeline will be purchasing line pack gas for gas day November 11,
2000. Please see attached document.

(See attached file: Offer to Purchase Nov. 11.doc)

Keith Irani
Manager, Marketing Services
Vector Pipeline
416 495-5960
keith.irani@cgc.enbridge.com
 - Offer to Purchase Nov. 11.doc


The holiday building hours for the Haas School of Business are as follows:

FRIDAY 12/21:
Faculty Bldg., Student Svcs. Bldg and Cheit Hall: OPEN 6:30 a.m. 10:00 p.m.

12/22 - 1/1:
Faculty Bldg., Student Svcs. Bldg and Cheit Hall: CLOSED FOR ENERGY CURTAILMENT
The Faculty and Student Svcs. Buildings will be accessible by cardkey only.

After January 2nd:
Faculty Bldg., Student Svcs. Bldg and Cheit Hall: REGULAR HOURS
Monday - Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.
Saturday - 8:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.
Sunday - 8:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.

Thank you,

Jennifer Jensen
Facilities  Supervisor
Haas School of Business
S545 Student Services Bldg.
University of California
Berkeley, CA  94720-1900

Tel:  (510) 642-9106
Fax:  (510) 642-4700


I'm going to Athens, TX for Molly's wedding tonight.

There is a band and a tent and it looks like there will be some food out
there.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart [SMTP:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 10:11 AM
To: Elliott, Shirley S.
Cc: Matthew.Lenhart
Subject: Re: band

there is a band?  what is going on this weekend?


Virginia,

We didn't have any interest in the piece.   I am interested in the following
lithos.  1. a signed Bonnard (no black and whites) and 2. a Toulouse LeTrec
(awful spelling).  Let me know if you locate some choices on those two.

Thanks,
mike


i'm free all week right now. prefer early in the week

"White, J. (Jennifer)" <Jennifer.White@OceanEnergy.com> on 02/26/2001
02:57:45 PM
To: "'john.arnold@enron.com'" <john.arnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: when are you free for scuba next week?

I just talked to Henry about another pool session.  What evenings are you
available next week so that we can coordinate with Jeff (instructor)?

The information contained in this communication is confidential and
proprietary information intended only for the individual or entity to whom
it is addressed.  Any unauthorized use, distribution, copying, or disclosure
of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
communication in error, please contact the sender immediately.  If you
believe this communication is inappropriate or offensive, please contact
Ocean Energy`s Human Resources Department.


We have a really old agreement with the referenced counterparty and I don't
think we use it to trade under anymore.  I spoke to the Confirm Desk and it
appears all of our trading is under Dynegy Marketing and Trade.  If you
concur, I would like to inactive that master, since I'm afraid it might get
attached for online trading.


There isn't much to the memo, but this is it!  It came out well after the end
of the work day for most folks.  I believe that Patti has sent you my travel
plans for next week.  Have a great weekend!
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001 09:20 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Office of the Chairman @ ENRON                           01/12/2001
07:31 PM

Sent by: Office of the Chairman@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Managing Director and Vice President Elections

The Managing Director PRC Committee met this week to elect individuals to
Managing Director and Vice President positions.  These employees are
recognized as outstanding contributors to the organization, whose individual
efforts have been instrumental in the continued success and growth of the
company.  We are pleased to announce the election of the following new
Managing Directors and Vice Presidents.  Please join us in congratulating
these individuals on their new appointments.

Managing Director ) Commercial

Phillip K. Allen, ENA (EWS) West Gas Trading - Houston
Franklin R. Bay, EBS Entertainment on Demand - Houston
Timothy N. Belden, ENA (EWS) ) West Power Trading - Portland
Michael R. Brown, EEL ) Executive - London
Christopher F. Calger, ENA (EWS) West Power Origination - Portland
Joseph M. Deffner, ENA (EWS) Treasury & Funding - Houston
Timothy J. Detmering, ENA (EWS) Corporate Development - Houston
William D. Duran, ENA (EWS) Generation Investments - Houston
Robert S. Gahn, EES Commodity Structuring - Houston
Kevin C. Garland, EBS Broadband Ventures - Houston
Ben F. Glisan, Jr., Corporate ) Global Equity Markets - Houston
Robert E. Hayes, ETS COMM Marketing - Houston
Phillip R. Milnthorp, ENA (EWS) Canada Origination & Trading - Calgary

Managing Director ) Commercial Support

Sally W. Beck, ENW (EWS) Energy Operations Management - Houston
Fernley Dyson, EEL Finance & Support Services - London

Vice President ) Commercial

Gregory Adams, EES MMC Management - Houston
Robert Bayley, EEL-UK Origination ) London
Jack D. Boatman, ETS Market Development ) Houston
Rhenn Cherry, EES Assets/Labor ) Houston
Niamh Clarke, EGM (EWS) Liquids Trading ) London
Peter Crilly, EEL-UK Origination ) London
Derek J. Davies, ENA (EWS) Canada Origination ) Calgary
Mark D. Davis, Jr., ENA (EWS) East Power Trading ) Houston
Charles Delacey, Corporate Finance ) Houston
Paul Devries, ENA (EWS) Canada Origination ) Toronto
Christopher H. Foster, ENA (EWS) West Power Trading ) Portland
Jeffrey F. Golden, EES Corporate Development ) Houston
Michael D. Grigsby, ENA West Gas Trading Group - Houston
Troy A. Henry, EES Bundled Sales-Heavy Industrial ) Houston
Rogers Herndon, ENA (EWS) East Power Trading ) Houston
James W. Lewis, EES Underwriting ) Houston
Christopher Mahoney, EGM (EWS) Liquids Trading ) London
Andrew Marsden, EBS Broadband Ventures ) London
John McClain, EBS Broadband Wholesale Origination ) Houston
Kevin J. McGowan, EGM (EWS) American Coal ) Houston
Albert E. McMichael, Jr., ENA (EWS) Gas Commodity Structuring ) Houston
Ermes I. Melinchon, Central America Origination ) Houston
Steven R. Meyers, EES Consumption ) Houston
Lloyd D. Miller, ENA (EWS) Portfolio Management ) Houston
Michael A. Miller, Wind Development / Execution-General Administration )
Houston
Marcello Romano, EBS EEL-Broadband Trading ) London
David A. Samuels, ENW (EWS) EnronOnline - Houston
Per A. Sekse, EGM (EWS) Global Risk Markets ) New York
Edward S. Smida, EBS Video on Demand ) Houston
Mark Tawney, EGM (EWS) Weather Trading ) Houston
Jon Thomsen, EBS Business Development ) Latin America/Canada ) Portland
Barry L. Tycholiz, ENA (EWS) West Gas Origination - Houston
Frank W. Vickers, ENA (EWS) East Gas Origination ) Houston
Amit Walia, Corporate, Corporate Development ) Houston
William White, EBS Global Bandwidth Risk Mgmt ) Houston
Jonathan Whitehead, EEL EA Trading ) Japan
Mark Whitt, ENA (EWS) West Gas Origination ) Denver
John A. Zufferli, ENA (EWS) Canada Power Trading - Calgary

Vice President ) Commercial Support

Beth Apollo, EEL Financial Operations Executive ) London
Marla Barnard, EBS Human Resources ) Houston
Karen L. Denne, Corporate, Public Relations ) Houston
Georganne M. Hodges, ENA (EWS) Trading, Origination & Power Plant Accounting
) Houston
Phillip Lord, EEL Transaction Support ) London
Peggy Mahoney, EES Marketing ) Communication ) Houston
Steven Montovano, Corporate, Government & Regulatory Affairs ) Dublin
Laura Scott, ENA (EWS) Canada Accounting ) Calgary
Richard C. Sherman, ENA (EWS) Transaction Support ) Houston
Gregory W. Stubblefield, EES Financial Planning & Reporting ) Houston
Dennis D. Vegas, CALME International Public Relations ) Houston

Vice President ) Specialized Technical

Sami Arap Sobrinho, ESA (EWS) Legal ) Houston
Merat Bagha, EBS Sales Engineering ) Houston
Justin Boyd, EEL Legal ) London
Mary Nell Browning, EBS Legal ) London
Jonathan Chapman, EEL Legal ) London
Robert D. Eickenroht, Corporate, Legal ) Houston
Mark Evans, EEL Legal ) London
David Forster, ENW (EWS) EnronOnline ) Houston
Janine Juggins, EEL Tax ) London
Peter C. Keohane, ENA (EWS) Canada Legal ) Calgary
Pinnamaneni V. Krishnarao, ENA (EWS) Research Group ) Houston
Travis C. McCullough, ENA (EWS) Finance Origination, Mergers/Acquisitions )
Houston
Michael Popkin, ESA (EWS) SA- Risk Management/Network Integration ) Houston
Elizabeth A. Sager, ENA (EWS) Physical Trading ) Houston
Richard B. Sanders, ENA (EWS) Litigation ) Houston
John W. Schwartzenburg, EECC Legal ) Houston
Michael D. Smith, EES Legal ) Houston
Marcus Vonbock Und Polach, EEL Legal ) London
Jay C. Webb, ENW (EWS) EnronOnline Systems ) Houston

Vice President ) Technical

Donald R. Hawkins, ETS Quality Management ) Houston
John R. Keller, ETS Engineering & Construction ) Houston


This was a good one, not a joke one.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kyle Jones" <hkjii@erols.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:18 PM
To:	'Benjamin James JONES \(E-mail\)'; 'Christopher Ridgway JONES \(E-mail\)'; 'Craig Stephen JONES \(E-mail\)'; 'Eileen \(Gillis\) JONES \(E-mail\)'; 'Harrison Kyle JONES Jr. \(E-mail\)'; 'Jay Charles JONES \(E-mail\)'; 'Jonathan Eric JONES \(E-mail\)'; 'Lee Osterman \(E-mail\)'; 'Sally and Bernie Case \(E-mail\)'; Jones, Tana
Subject:	FW: We'll Go Forward

-----Original Message-----
From: ComputerDe@aol.com [mailto:ComputerDe@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:46 AM
To: islandfan@aol.com; roleranger@aol.com; llevinson@sidley.com;
smmihalko@aol.com; hkjii@erols.com
Subject: Fwd: We'll Go Forward

From: <valeria.dusablon@gm.com>
To: "Family" <Family@gm.com>
Subject: Fwd: We'll Go Forward
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 07:27:23 -0400
Message-ID: <85256AE9.003EF012.00@usabhmg02.mail.gm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01C15968.186249D0"
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)
X-Lotus-FromDomain: GM
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200

---------------------- Forwarded by Valeria DuSablon/US/GM/GMC on 10/18/2001
07:27 AM ---------------------------

Gail M. Collins
10/17/2001 08:59 AM

To:   bquarles@saltonusa.com, bruthen@home.com, mssofty1@home.com,
      janetchap@msn.com, cajunrk@aol.com, Valeria DuSablon/US/GM/GMC@GM,
      susanmatt@aol.com, John G Flynn/US/GM/GMC@GM, nmshook@earthlink.com
cc:
Subject:  Fwd: We'll Go Forward

---------------------- Forwarded by Gail M. Collins/US/GM/GMC on 10/17/2001
08:50 AM ---------------------------

Janice Champa
10/16/2001 03:56 PM

To:   jjchampa@msn.com, Gail M. Collins/US/GM/GMC@GM
cc:
Subject:  Fwd: We'll Go Forward

---------------------- Forwarded by Janice Champa/US/GM/GMC on 10/16/2001
03:35
PM ---------------------------

"Eric Champa" <Eric.Champa@trw.com> on 10/16/2001 03:15:25 PM

To:   Janice Champa/US/GM/GMC@GM
cc:
Subject:  Fwd: We'll Go Forward

Hi Mom,
I hope you got your package by now.  I found my receipt from the post
office the other day just in case I need it.  I attached a powerpoint
presentation a friend sent me.  It is pretty good. It takes a few
seconds to load up so be patient.  Let me know if you received you
package.  Eric

Eric Champa
Project Engineer
p 480-722-6267
f 480-722-4375
eric.champa@trw.com

Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:57:16 -0400
From: "Don Hanson" <Don.Hanson@trw.com>
To: "Amish Patel" <Amish.Patel@trw.com>,
     "Chris Ruf" <Chris.Ruf@trw.com>,
     "David Magoteaux" <David.Magoteaux@trw.com>,
     "Eric Champa" <Eric.Champa@trw.com>,
     "Eric McFarland" <Eric.Mcfarland@trw.com>,
     "Jon Freesmeier" <Jon.Freesmeier@trw.com>,
     "Lloyd Green" <Lloyd.Green@trw.com>,
     "Rich DeBolt" <Rich.Debolt@trw.com>
Subject: We'll Go Forward

 - We'llGoForward_1.pps


Jeff,

I got this from http://www.socalgas.com/candi/prices/pricing_monthly1.shtml

Farther back, MRW (actually, I) gave information to Michael Wong which I
think has monthly WACOGs in it.

Alan  Comnes

Monthly Gas Procurement Rates

Month Effective Core Procurement Gas Price
(Cents Per Therm)
December 12/01/00 65.307
November 11/01/00 56.311
October 10/01/00 57.038
September 09/01/00 56.506
August
 08/01/00
 39.267

July
 07/01/00
 46.102

June
 06/01/00
 41.307

May
 05/01/00
 32.723

April
 04/01/00
 31.892

March
 03/01/00
 26.844

February
 02/01/00
 27.084

January
 01/08/00
 25.487

December
 12/01/99
 24.736

About this month's natural gas prices...

The procurement price increased by about 8.996 cents per therm from November,
2000 to December, 2000. This net increase is due to the commodity gas price
increasing by 12.681 cents per therm, plus a decrease in the Regulatory
adjustment of 3.685 cents per therm.

The increase in prices is generally due to the high demand caused by cold
temperatures throughout the country combined with reduced flowing supply.

View our more detailed monthly price data and our commercial and industrial
rates.

Calculated in accordance with Tariff Schedule G-CP (Core Procurement Service)

This information is also available on our Rate Information Hotline at
(213)244-2898.

Southern California Gas Company is not responsible for typographical errors.

Copyright , 2000 Southern California Gas Company


TUFCO has agreed to remove the exception to consequentials for breach of
quality provisions.  They are preparing executables and will forward to HPL
for execution.  Thanks for your help.

---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 06/16/99 10:45 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Gerald Nemec                           06/15/99 03:14 PM

To: Steve -HPL- Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ted C Bland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert D Morgan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara Gray, Janet
H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: TUFCO Trawick I/C

Steve,  We are currently negotiating an interconnect agreement for an upgrade
of an existing interconnect off the Trawick System into TUFCO.  The
interconnect is solely a delivery to TUFCO.  We are down to one point of
difference in the agreement.

Typically HPL disclaims any liability for consequential damages to the other
party.  TUFCO is asking for an exception for any violation of gas quality
specifications.  This would mean that if HPL delivered off spec gas to TUFCO
which required cleanup of their pipeline system or caused damage to a
customer of TUFCO's HPL would be liable under this Agreement.

From a legal standpoint, we can make this exception, but I wanted to make
sure everyone understood and agreed with the acceptance of this potential
liability.  Assuming we are properly monitoring all our receipts there
shouldn't be an issue.

Please let me know what you think about this situation.  I can forward a copy
of the interconnect agreement if you do not currently have one.


Bill and Tanya:
Enclosed is a list of "follow-up" items that we came up with based on what we
talked about last Friday.  Maybe some of these can be discussed at our next
group meeting next week so that we are clear on who is handling which issue.
Feel free to send me any thoughts you may have on these issues.  We really
appreciate the enthusiasm that your group has for these seminars and look
forward to doing more of them in the future.
Carol


For our hourly, daily and term indexes, log on to  www.tradersnewspower.com.
?
?
Bobette  Riner???????????????????????????????
Senior Power Markets Analyst??????
TradersNews Energy
713/647-8690
FAX: 713/647-7552
cell:  832/428-7008
bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com
http://www.tradersnewspower.com
?
?
 - DlyMrkt 020101.doc


Excellent idea!!  There is ample opportunity for all three of us in the hot
air business.  I talked to Dave yesterday and I think this is a great fit for
him.  He's back to doing what he does best--convincing investors and
customers to pour money into a hole in the ground!

"Alan Jenkins" <ajenkins@lanlaw.com> on 10/20/2000 08:54:21 AM
To: dfossum@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Mr. Hooker

I was in Houston Wednesday and got a chance to catch up a little with the
hooker&cooker tandem.  You may know that David has started into a new venture
selling either compressed air or energy from compressed air (he's not sure
which yet).  We agreed that his only concern is that you might want to enter
the market because with all your hot air, the market would be saturated!


CALENDAR ENTRY:	REMINDER

Description:
	Emmy's

Date:		9/10/2000
Time:		7:00 PM (Central Standard Time)
Not for public viewing

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


yes.

	From:  Jennifer Fraser                           10/17/2000 08:58 AM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: October 16, 2000 Issue of Petroleum Refining Weekly.e

People this is a good refining overview . It summarizes all the key movements
in the market.
PLease let me know if you would like to receive it on a regular basis.
--

 - WK1016.pdf


I was informed late last week that EOL is looking to me to determine whether
U.S. counterparties should be permitted to trade European power products via
EOL.  According to Edmund Cooper and Tana Jones, the London office is
deciding whether European counterparties should be permitted to trade U.S.
power products via EOL.  I believe that this allocation of counterparty
review responsibility (with regard to power products) should be reversed.
The legal team for U.S. power is in the best position to determine whether a
counterparty, domestic or European, has the requisite legal authority to
trade U.S. power, and I believe that the London office is better positioned
to determine whether a counterparty, U.S. or other, has the requisite
authority to trade a European power product.

As we have discussed during the last week, a counterparty must have specific
federal regulatory authorization in order to trade U.S. power.  I cannot
identify any foreign counterparties from my lists of federally authorized
entities and think it highly unlikely that a foreign counterparty will have
the necessary authority to trade U.S. power.  Jim Fallon has expressly
instructed me that in the event we do not currently trade U.S. power with a
counterparty and cannot otherwise confirm that a specific counterparty
possesses regulatory approval to trade power, a counterparty should NOT be
permitted to trade U.S. power via EOL.  Accordingly, I return to my initial
position that except for those foreign counterparties with whom we are
currently trading over-the-counter (if any), all foreign counterparties
should be granted read-only access to U.S. power products.  In the event a
specific counterparty requests access to U.S. power trading, we can examine
whether that specific party possesses the necessary authority to trade
power.

Edmund Cooper and Justin Boyd are reviewing whether a similar bar should
apply to the trading of European power by U.S. counterparties, and I will
defer to their judgment on that issue.

Please call me at *36121 with any questions or comments.

Regards,

Leslie Hansen


Ashley,

This is one resume I got today. I think that it makes sense to invite him
for an interview directly with my group. He does not qualify as an analyst
candidate.
What do you think?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000
04:14 PM ---------------------------

Rajnish Kamat <kamat@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 10/23/2000 07:55:31 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: UC-Berkeley Graduate Student

Dr. Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director and Head of Research
Enron Corp.

Dear Dr. Kaminski,
It was a pleasure talking with you and attending your talk today.
I am a graduate student in Industrial Engg. and Operations
Research working with Prof. Shmuel Oren
on topics in financial instrument pricing and design of
contracts in deregulated electricity markets. I am also
doing research in auction models and computable equilibrium
models with applications in electricity market design.

I am planning to graduate with a Ph.D. in May 2001 and would
appreciate hearing about any opportunities in your group at Enron.
I am attaching at copy of my resume (file: cvrkamat.doc) for your perusal.

Thanking you,
Sincerely,

Rajnish Kamat
Graduate Student
IEOR, UC-Berkeley

4135, Etcheverry Hall
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley, CA, 94710

 - CVRKAMAT.DOC


I understand we have the CES Cove Point  storage contracts set up as CES-Cove
Point in global.  What is the status of the paperwork and who is following up
on it.  Whent I look on Cove Point's website, I show that Enron North America
now has 3 storage contracts.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2000 04:43
PM ---------------------------

Brenda H Fletcher
01/26/2000 08:24 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sherry Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cove Point - Jan Pre-payment

Per Sherry, Global Counterparty is recognizing CES - Cove Point as the
counterparty  instead of Cove Point for the January payment.
The reason is lack of the appropriate paperwork executed by the
counterparty.

Brenda


Understanding there won't be a call on Monday, here's a draft of the auction
slides that we've been working on for folks to review.


Because of the scheduled Employee Meeting at the Hyatt, we will move Steve's meeting to 9:00a on Tuesday.

Please adjust your calendars accordingly.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Audrey
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:10 AM
To:	Robertson, Audrey; Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Donoho, Lindy; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Y'Barbo, Paul
Subject:	RE: 2002 Plan Strategy Meeting

Steve's 2002 Plan Strategy Meeting has been moved to a new date and time.  Please mark your calendars to reflect:

		Tuesday, October 23, 10:00 - 11:00, EB-1336

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Audrey
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:47 AM
To:	Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Donoho, Lindy; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Y'Barbo, Paul
Cc:	Robertson, Audrey
Subject:	RE: 2002 Plan Strategy Meeting

Please be informed, Steve's  2002 Plan Strategy Meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, October 9, 10:00 - 11:00a in EB-1336.

Please mark your calendars accordingly.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax

(713) 646-2551 Fax


Please deleate me from this list

Douglas R. Brawley
Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative
503.288.5555

	"Dalia, Keith A - TOS-DITT1" <kadalia@BPA.GOV>
	Sent by: RTO West Regional Representatives Group <RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG>

	05/15/01 04:39 PM
	Please respond to RTO West Regional Representatives Group
		? ? ? ?
		? ? ? ? To: ? ? ? ?RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG
		? ? ? ? cc: ? ? ? ?
		? ? ? ? Subject: ? ? ? ?

You have been added to the RRGA-L mailing list (RTO West Congestion Model
Content Group) by Keith Dalia <kadalia@BPA.GOV>.

Please save this message for future ?reference, especially if this is the
first time you subscribe to an ?electronic mailing list. If you ever need
to ?leave the ?list, ?you ?will find ?the ?necessary instructions ?below.
Perhaps ?more importantly, ?saving a ?copy of ?this message ?(and of ?all
future subscription notices ?from other mailing lists) in ?a special mail
folder will give you instant access to the list of mailing lists that you
are subscribed ?to. This may ?prove very useful the ?next time you ?go on
vacation and ?need to leave ?the lists temporarily so ?as not to ?fill up
your ?mailbox while ?you ?are away! ?You should ?also ?save the ?"welcome
messages" from the ?list owners that you will ?occasionally receive after
subscribing to a new list.

To send ?a message to ?all the people ?currently subscribed to ?the list,
just send mail ?to RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. This is ?called "sending mail
to the ?list", because ?you send ?mail to a ?single address ?and LISTSERV
makes ?copies ?for all ?the ?people ?who ?have subscribed. ?This ?address
(RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG) ?is also ?called the ?"list address". ?You must
never try to send any command to that address, as it would be distributed
to all the people ?who have subscribed. All commands must ?be sent to the
"LISTSERV ?address", ? LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. ?It ? is ?very
important to understand ?the difference between the ?two, but fortunately
it is ?not complicated. The ?LISTSERV address is ?like a FAX ?number that
connects you ?to a ?machine, whereas ?the list address ?is like ?a normal
voice line connecting you to a person. If you make a mistake and dial the
FAX number ?when you ?wanted to talk ?to someone on ?the phone, ?you will
quickly realize ?that you used the ?wrong number and call ?again. No harm
will have been done. If on the ?other hand you accidentally make your FAX
call ?someone's ?voice ?line, ?the ?person receiving ?the ?call ?will ?be
inconvenienced, especially if your FAX then re-dials every 5 minutes. The
fact that ?most people ?will eventually ?connect the ?FAX machine ?to the
voice line to ?allow the FAX to ?go through and make the ?calls stop does
not mean ?that you ?should continue ?to send FAXes ?to the ?voice number.
People would just get mad at you. ?It works pretty much the same way with
mailing ?lists, with ?the difference ?that ?you are ?calling hundreds ?or
thousands of people ?at the same time, and consequently ?you can expect a
lot of people to get upset if ?you consistently send commands to the list
address.

You may leave the list at any ?time by sending a "SIGNOFF RRGA-L" command
to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You can also tell LISTSERV how you
want it to confirm ?the receipt of messages you send to ?the list. If you
do not trust ?the system, send a "SET RRGA-L ?REPRO" command and LISTSERV
will send you a ?copy of your own messages, so that you ?can see that the
message was distributed and did not get damaged on the way. After a while
you ?may find ?that this ?is getting ?annoying, especially ?if your ?mail
program does not ?tell you that the ?message is from you ?when it informs
you that new mail has arrived from ?RRGA-L. If you send a "SET RRGA-L ACK
NOREPRO" command, LISTSERV will mail you a short acknowledgement instead,
which ?will look ?different in ?your ?mailbox directory. ?With most ?mail
programs you ?will know immediately ?that this is an ?acknowledgement you
can read ?later. Finally, ?you can ?turn off ?acknowledgements completely
with "SET RRGA-L NOACK NOREPRO".

Following ?instructions from ?the list ?owner, your ?subscription options
have been set to "NOFILES REPRO" rather than the usual LISTSERV defaults.
For more ?information about subscription ?options, send a ?"QUERY RRGA-L"
command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.

Contributions sent to this list are automatically archived. You can get a
list of the available archive files ?by sending an "INDEX RRGA-L" command
to ?LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You ?can then ?order these ?files
with a "GET RRGA-L LOGxxxx" ?command, or using LISTSERV's database search
facilities. Send an ?"INFO DATABASE" command for more ?information on the
latter.

This ?list is ?available ?in digest ?form. ?If you ?wish ?to receive ?the
digested version of the postings, just issue a SET RRGA-L DIGEST command.

Please note that ?it is presently possible for other ?people to determine
that ?you are ?signed up ?to the ?list through ?the use ?of the ?"REVIEW"
command, ?which ?returns ? the ?e-mail ?address ?and ?name ? of ?all ?the
subscribers. If ?you do not ?want your name to ?be visible, just ?issue a
"SET RRGA-L CONCEAL" command.

More ?information on ?LISTSERV ?commands ?can be ?found ?in the ?LISTSERV
reference ?card, which ?you can ?retrieve ?by sending ?an "INFO ?REFCARD"
command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.


Don't you recall that we created a response or amendment format?  What am I
recalling?  SS

Lucy Ortiz
10/21/99 03:08 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: APEA / Chase: Change in Reporting of NGI's 1st of Month Indices

What is the formal format we have for notifying Chase?  Do I need to send
them the edition that announced the change or ???
What is your suggestion?
I bring this up only because we were so adamant about creating the
confirmation and then e-mailing it over to Chase so that they could be the
confirming party.

~I mean, do we need to draft the changes that we want on the confirm and send
it over to them and ask them to change the confirm???

~Or is all of this covered under the ISDA and we only need to make them aware
that  the publication made some changes?

Sara Shackleton
10/21/99 01:28 PM
To: Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: APEA / Chase: Change in Reporting of NGI's 1st of Month Indices

I thought we had devised a format for any response.  I'm glad to meet with
you anytime.  Currently, I have severe laryngitis and I am unable to speak.
I will probably be limited on Friday as well.  We can manage if you come to
my office.  Let me know.  SS

Lucy Ortiz
10/20/99 11:22 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: APEA / Chase: Change in Reporting of NGI's 1st of Month Indices

Sara,

I don't think that we ever got around to talking about how we should notify
Chase of this change.  Could we do that before I leave?  Hopefully sometime
this week.
Does the ISDA cover publication changes?  Somehow I thought it did.  It does
doesn't it?  I just can't remember in which section.
Many thanks,

Lucy
---------------------- Forwarded by Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT on 10/20/99 11:20 AM
---------------------------

Laird Dyer
09/23/99 05:46 PM
To: Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sandra McDonald/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: APEA / Chase: Change in Reporting of NGI's 1st of Month Indices

Lucy,

Effective September 1st, Natural Gas Intelligence changed the reporting of
the California Border and City-Gate 1st of month indices.  These indices were
formerly reported in a separate table.  That table has been eliminated and
these indices have been included within the general table.   These changes
are minor; however, we need to ensure that Chase knows of the change.  Can
you please handle this?  It affects Glendale, Pasadena and SMUD.

The following are the new definitions:

1.  Malin:  the "Bidweek Avg." price for California, Malin, published in
Natural Gas Intelligence, or successor publication, in the first issue
published on or about the first Monday of the delivery Month in the table
identified as "Spot Gas Prices".

2. Kern River Station: the "Bidweek Avg" price for California, Kern River
Station, PG&E, published in Natural Gas Intelligence, or successor
publication, in the first issue published on or about the first Monday of the
delivery Month in the table identified as "Spot Gas Prices".

3.  Topock: the "Bidweek Avg" price for California, Southern Cal. Border
Avg., published in Natural Gas Intelligence, or successor publication, in the
first issue published on or about the first Monday of the delivery Month in
the table identified as "Spot Gas Prices".

4.  PG&E Citygate: the "Bidweek Avg" price for California, PG&E Citygate,
published in Natural Gas Intelligence, or successor publication, in the first
issue published on or about the first Monday of the delivery Month in the
table identified as "Spot Gas Prices".

Glendale and Pasadena are affected at Topock.  SMUD is affected at all four
points.

Let me know if you need additional clarification or information.

Thanks for your help.

Laird


564894 - changed to Bloomberg - but it's a buy, not a sale - is this the same
deal prebon is missing?

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/29/2001 02:25 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/29 Checkout

AMEREX
All deals o.k.

PREBON

Mark Fischer
deal 564894
Prebon does not recognize

BLOOMBERG

Mark Fischer
I am missing the following deal:
Enron sells to El Paso 25 mw May PV  $304.00
I believe this deal is the deal prebon does not recognize--564894


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES on 08/28/2000 01:29
PM ---------------------------

kpope@enron.com on 08/28/2000 11:39:17 AM
To: <meberts@enron.com>, <pmahoney@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Industry News: Charges of Gouging as Power Costs Skyrocket

fyi from kpope@enron.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------
E-mailed by: Dow Jones Interactive (R) Server Software
Folder: Industry News
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Headlines:
Charges of Gouging as Power Costs Skyrocket
Energy: Critics say tactics allowed in the deregulated market, which let
suppliers reap big profits, illustrate flaws in the system. As the
state's booming economy taxes the ability to meet electricity demands, a
federal investigation is underway.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
  National Desk
Charges of Gouging as Power Costs Skyrocket
Energy: Critics say tactics allowed in the deregulated market, which let
suppliers reap big profits, illustrate flaws in the system. As the
state's booming economy taxes the ability to meet electricity demands, a
federal investigation is underway.
CHRIS KRAUL
TIMES STAFF WRITER

Aug. 28, 2000
Los Angeles Times
Home Edition
Page A-1
Copyright 2000 / The Times Mirror Company

   With Southern Californians reeling from skyrocketing electric bills,
critics charge that fewer than a dozen power suppliers are reaping far
greater profits than are justified by the recent surge in wholesale prices
of the natural gas they use to create electricity.

  Their behavior is a major focus of a formal investigation announced
last week by federal regulators. Among those under scrutiny are power
merchants including Duke Energy, Dynegy,
Reliant Energy, Calpine,
Southern Co. and the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. Critics
say the companies are earning huge windfalls selling energy to the two
state agencies charged with distributing power in California.

   The power merchants themselves deny any profiteering, describing their
market moves as legal business practices and welcoming the investigation.
   The underlying cause of California's energy turmoil is a severe
shortage of power-generating capacity to meet the soaring energy demands
of the state's booming economy. This summer the state at times has had to
import more than 20% of its energy needs, a shortfall equal to the output
of about 20 medium-size power plants. No plants of any size have been
built in the state in 10 years.
   But the problem goes beyond a supply-and-demand imbalance. The
so-called merchant power companies' ability to bend the market to their
advantage--using what appear to be legal strategies--illustrates what
many say are serious flaws in the state's deregulated energy market.
   One major flaw is that sellers do not have to participate in the
state's main electricity auction--the so-called "day forward" sale held
one day before electricity is delivered to the state's residences and
businesses. Instead, generators are withholding power until the day of
delivery, when desperate state agencies are willing to pay steep prices
to keep the power flowing.
   The upshot has been a doubling of electric bills for the 1.2 million
customers in San Diego Gas&Electric's coverage area, and Southern
California Edison and Pacific Gas&Electric customers may be facing
higher prices once their rates are unfrozen in 2002.
   There is little prospect for short-term relief; with no additional
power generation due for a year, the prices of natural gas and crude oil
are still rising. In fact, state officials expect the market to become
tighter over the next year as demand and fuel prices rise.
   In pointing the finger at the power merchants, Gov. Gray Davis, some
academics and utility executives charge that California consumers are
being victimized by sophisticated trading techniques that take advantage
of the market system to extract huge profits.
   Deregulation "only works if people act responsibly. It won't work if
people say their only goal is to make as much money as humanly possible,"
Davis said last week.
   This brokering takes place on the California Power Exchange and the
Independent System Operator, two agencies created by the 1996 legislation
that ostensibly opened up 70% of the state's power market--represented by
the PG&E, SCE and SDG&E service areas--to competition. To create that
competition, lawmakers ordered the utilities to sell power plants to
independent companies, which now are selling electricity to the state.
   The Power Exchange is a clearinghouse for the bulk of energy trading
that is completed a day in advance of delivery, which normally fills most
of the state's energy needs. The ISO, the nominal traffic cop arranging
deliveries over the power grid, also has the authority to hold same-day
power auctions for immediate delivery in the event of unexpectedly high
demand.
   The Power Exchange is subject to a price cap of $250 per
megawatt-hour, a ceiling imposed earlier this summer as prices began to
soar. But the ISO has the authority to pay as much as it has to for
supplementary power if the previous-day purchases prove insufficient to
keep the state's lights on.
   And it is the secondary ISO market where power suppliers, leveraging a
seller's market, are holding sway. By withholding their energy from the
Power Exchange and opting instead to bid their supply to the ISO, they
are betting that same-day shortages will generate prices as close to the
price cap as possible, possibly even above it.
   It's apparently working.
   On some days, the ISO has ended up buying one-fifth of the state's
energy needs, not the 5% to 10% maximum originally envisioned. In the
process, desperate to meet demand, the ISO is paying premium prices and
those prices are being passed along to consumers.
   The problem with the market apparently defies easy solutions. At an
emergency meeting Friday to discuss ways of dealing with the crisis, the
ISO board rejected a staff proposal to force energy merchants to allocate
at least 90% of the electricity they intend to sell in the "day forward"
auction held by the Power Exchange, instead of holding back until the day
of delivery.
   Although ISO Chief Executive Terry Winter said the measure would
restore some market order, the board rejected it on fears that it might
create unforeseen ramifications, possibly even power suppliers abandoning
the state altogether.
   As the market stands now, independent power companies have been able
to exploit the power shortages and the market's quirks to charge the
state higher rates than the increases in the price of natural gas would
seem to warrant, said Severin Borenstein, a UC Berkeley professor and
energy specialist.
   With fellow UC Berkeley professor James Bushnell and Stanford's Frank
Wolak, Borenstein studied the Power Exchange over a 15-month period ended
in September and found evidence of "market power," or the power
generators' ability to raise prices above competitive levels for
sustained periods.
   Unless there is collusion among two or more power providers, the
exercise of market power is not illegal, experts say. But if prolonged,
it is a symptom of a seriously dysfunctional market.
   "I think [market power] has probably gotten worse this year. There are
players big enough to move the price and move it a lot. Prices are
clearly way above their costs," Borenstein said.
   Edison CEO John Bryson and Stephen Baum, head of SDG&E parent Sempra
Energy, have similar criticisms. Their claims will be investigated by the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the latest of five probes underway
into California's worsening energy predicament. "We'll see whether there
are alternative market rules that should be adopted to have a better
functioning, more efficient market," said Daniel Larcamp, FERC's director
of market tariffs and rates. "Looking at market power issues is an
important focus of our investigation."
   Power suppliers Duke Energy and Calpine denied any market
manipulation, saying the bulk of their energy is sold on long-term
contracts and is not used to unduly sway day-ahead prices on the Power
Exchange or same-day sales on the ISO.
   "No way are we manipulating the market, and we have welcomed
investigation into our business practices," said Tom Williams, spokesman
for Duke Energy's California regional office in Morro Bay. "It's easy to
point fingers at someone who controls only 4% of the market, much of
which has already been sold in the forward market months ago."
   Calpine spokesman Bill Highlander said the high prices are simply a
case of demand far outstripping the state's ability to meet it. "Ten
years ago, you had more supply than demand. Now you have a skyrocketing
demand from population growth, a robust economy and Internet-fed
additions to demand," Highlander said.
   Charles Cicchetti, a USC professor of government, business and the
economy, agrees and said the market is performing exactly as expected,
given supply shortages. He objects to the limited price ceilings opposed
by state officials.
   "The choice should be to either regulate the whole thing, go back to
where we were or let the market work," Cicchetti said. "This hybrid is
causing problems to get worse."
   But something appears to be worsening an already bad pricing
situation, and critics believe it is market manipulation. In the FERC
order initiating its investigation, the agency noted that California's
wholesale electricity costs on June 29 were $340 million--a sevenfold
increase over the same date in 1999. Over the same period, natural gas
prices only doubled.
   FERC will look at other aspects of the state's energy deregulation as
well--at the fact that utilities have no choice but to purchase power
from the central power exchange and have only limited power to hedge or
make bilateral deals on their own with outside firms.
   In an interview last week, the FERC's Larcamp said his agency is
reserving the right to roll back rates, order refunds or even impose a
new market framework to replace the Power Exchange and ISO.
   Larcamp said the FERC's probe will contrast California's troubled
power market with the Pennsylvania-Maryland-New Jersey system, which
gives end users more freedom to cut their own deals with suppliers. The
result is that Pennsylvania has more than 130 power suppliers competing
for the state's business, versus no more than 15 in California.
   *
   Times staff writers Nancy Vogel and Nancy Rivera Brooks contributed to
this story.

LATM0024100606

To view all headlines in the folder Industry News, go to
http://eeshou-dowj1/browsearticles.asp?folderid=1

To go to the front page of Dow Jones Interactive Intranet Toolkit Server
Software, go to
http://eeshou-dowj1/

-------------------------------------------------------------------
For assistance, contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at
djip.itkhelp@dowjones.com or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S.
and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact your local sales representative.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright  , 2000 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC. All Rights
Reserved.


Oddly, a much more positive (and satisfying) response than I'd imagined.
Congratulations.  And thanks again for your efforts.  If I don't see you, Ms
Kahl, bon voyage, bonnes vacances, and a bientot.

Best,
Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2000
02:42 PM ---------------------------

"Bruce McMills" <bmcmills@duke-energy.com> on 02/25/2000 09:19:35 AM
To: dfarmer@enron.com, briley@enron.com, "William E. Speckels"
<WESPECKELS@duke-energy.com>, "Chad W. Cass" <CWCASS@duke-energy.com>, "Donna
C. Spencer" <dcspencer@duke-energy.com>
cc: "Michael R. Cherry" <mrcherry@duke-energy.com>, "Darrel F. Bane"
<dfbane@duke-energy.com>
Subject: Nomination - HPL Dleivery to Eastrans - 3/1/2000

THis is to nominate 65,000 MMBtu/d for 3/1 from HPL to Eastrans.

7,000 MMBtu will come from Fuels Cotton Valley.
58,000 MMBtu will be delivered to PG & E.


Commissioners Henry M. Duque and Richard A. Bilas, dissenting:

One could say that this order is consistent with the Administration's present third world country mentality. We are punishing the very consumers and providers who made a commitment to ensuring electric restructuring did work by adding a demand retail component to cure the dysfunctions in the wholesale market.

We are not convinced that the Department of Water Resources (DWR) bond ratings depend on killing direct access.  This notion is a scare tactic and a smoke screen. Direct access comprises such a small percentage of overall demand that it cannot reasonably be seen to be a threat to the sale of the bonds. Direct Access should be seen as a benefit to DWR.  It would decrease the amount of the utilities net short obligations and relieve DWR from its power purchasing responsibilities sooner.

Something else is going on here. We think that the DWR does not want direct access because if the public is presented with alternatives, it will make DWR's purchasing mistakes abundantly clear. The Commission should be holding hearings to test the assertions being made by DWR, Finance and the Treasurer.  Instead, the Commission is making an ill informed, panicked decision to act now and study the repercussions later.

	DWR and the bonds should not be threatened by direct access if DWR is making prudent energy purchases. Only if DWR's contracts are too expensive, relative to market, will customers seek shelter in lower direct access prices. Indeed, retaining direct access as a way to send price signals to consumers may be the only way to place pressure on DWR to make more prudent purchases. This is a very important consideration since AB 1X prevents us from engaging in any prudency review of the DWR costs to be passed through to ratepayers in order to repay the bonds. If there is no yardstick, how can anyone measure DWR performance? The answer is, one can't, unless SB 18xx is signed into law.

	We think that additional review of these issues, before suspending direct access, would have produced a more sound decision in the long run.

For these reasons we must respectfully dissent.

/s/ HENRY M. DUQUE				  /s/ RICHARD A. BILAS
        Henry M. Duque						Richard A. Bilas
     	  Commissioner					   Commissioner

September 20, 2001


We have completed the benefits portion of the due diligence report on Project
Canary.  The highlighted portions require additional information and
documentation.  As per our discussion yesterday, there are numerous questions
regarding Compensation in the Benefits section.  It is my understanding that
Compensation is responding to those issues.  If you have any questions or if
we can be of assistance, please let us know.

Linda


?EDMUNDS' REVIEW

		Nissan's hardy Pathfinder has always been our vehicle of choice for seeking a
new path to the premium outlet center. Though the exterior may exude that
tough-guy outdoorsy image, the interior has always been comfortable enough
for the dilettante woodsman who doesn't like to get his nails too dirty.
Though the old 3.3-liter V6 engine provided acceptable levels of low-end
grunt, the coarsely produced 170 horsepower it made was meager when stacked
against newer competitors.
		So revel, all you who seek liberation from urban ennui -- the Pathfinder is
finally energized by a stouter V6, based on the Maxima sedan's stellar
powerplant. When mated to a five-speed manual transmission, the 3.5-liter,
DOHC V6 engine produces a mighty 250 horsepower and 240 foot-pounds of
torque. Matching it to an automatic tranny will usurp 10 ponies but add 25
foot-pounds of twist, still ample power to haul plenty of equipment and go
mountain climbing, as well as merge onto freeways without fear.
		The Pathfinder comes with rear-wheel or part-time four-wheel drive, the
latter of which provides a shift-on-the-fly transfer case that can be engaged
at speeds up to 50 mph. On LE models, an automatic All-Mode four-wheel-drive
system can be specified for 2001, giving you one more reason to skip paying
the extra tariff the Infiniti QX4 commands. All-Mode operates in 2WD,
automatic 4WD, 4WD-Hi and 4WD-Lo, all selected using a simple rotary knob on
the dashboard.
		We've long admired the Pathfinder for its excellent ride and handling,
further enhanced by solid unibody construction. The interior, one of the
friendliest of any SUV on the market, is spruced up for 2001 with an updated
instrument panel. A new dual level center console with a padded armrest and
12-volt power source will organize all your gewgaws.
		You can choose from three trim levels -- the XE, which for the 2001 model
year comes with standard power windows, mirrors and locks, and a security
system; the sporty SE, which gives you a choice of automatic or manual
transmission along with sporty trim; and the top-of-the-line LE, which
includes fog lights, Bose audio system, and fake wood accents.
		All models come standard with 16-inch wheels, full-size spare tire, a CD
player and ABS. Side airbags can be ordered as long as they are contained in
leather-wrapped seating, which is available only on SE and LE. Those same
models, when power is transferred to the drive wheels via an automatic
transmission, can be equipped with a mobile entertainment system, which
includes a 6.4-inch flip-down LCD screen, video player, and ports to plug and
play a PlayStation 2 (And we all know how important that will be after
Christmas, don't we?). A "Birdview" navigation system, shared with the
Infiniti QX4, is also available, but we don't recommend it. While the
"Birdview" perspective is interesting, teensy, tiny, little, itty-bitty
buttons control the thing, along with some of the climate control functions.
Get a map.
		Items that remain static from last year include a substantial maximum cargo
carrying capacity of 85 cubic feet (surprising for what appears to be a
relatively small vehicle). Some of this space, in our humble opinion, should
have been used to alleviate the still-cramped rear accommodations.
		Despite a few quibbles, we're thrilled that Nissan finally rectified the
Pathfinder's main problem -- horsepower. With this updated, competitive
package, we're betting fat rebates and dealer incentives have gone the way of
the Dodo.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
05:05 PM ---------------------------

KRuscitti@aol.com on 01/06/2000 05:29:38 PM
To: Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Dogs

Return-path: KRuscitti@aol.com
From: KRuscitti@aol.com
Full-name: KRuscitti
Message-ID: <0.12be7f0f.25a39dc5@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 14:02:29 EST
Subject: Dogs
To: lisa.a.tagert@jci.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part2_a3.a3c6b9ea.25a39dc5_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 18

cccc

 - DCP00617.BMP


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
08:48 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/14/2001 09:53 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell
Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--3/14/01


The attached swaps will be delivered by hard copy batch, together with the
revised proposal sheets and a copy of the legal worksheets, to Gordon
McKillop, in Julia Chin's absence, today.  Upon receipt, Gordon will attach
the valuation data that has been previously provided to Julia Chin by Hope
Vargas and coordinate execution.

First, additional publics representing the incremental interests of Chewco,
then followed by numerous privates.  As of now, we still are working
Catalytica and Merlin.

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"LYNN RICHARDSON" <LERICHRD@wapa.gov>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22LYNN+20RICHARDSON+22+20+3CLERICHRD+40wapa+2Egov+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, June 18, 2001 3:25 PM
To:	Bruce.McIver@BCHydro.bc.ca; Lisa.Will@BCHydro.bc.ca; Navjote.Jagpal@BCHydro.bc.ca; ddelzer@bepc.com; thylden@bepc.com; david_toole@cargill.com; jeffrey_cravens@cargill.com; mark_myers@cargill.com; hgreen@csu.org; skoch@csu.org; philtice@deseretgt.com; fwright@digisys.net; Cherie.L.Steigerwald@dynegy.com; Clemons, Amy; Semperger, Cara; Robinson, Donald; Runswick, Stacy; shultsjw@er.oge.com; rfrancis@idacorpenergy.com; jshadie@idahopower.com; kgillis@idahopower.com; panderson@idahopower.com; tmilam@idahopower.com; TTaylor@idahopower.com; biggst@lac.losalamos.nm.us; Chambellan@lac.losalamos.nm.us; gregg.oetting@mirant.com; ted.bauman@mirant.com; paul.smallwood@ncepower.com; cLangston@NMPPENERGY.org; cstanley@NMPPENERGY.org; dbreithaupt@NMPPENERGY.org; jwoita@NMPPENERGY.org; kgaden@NMPPENERGY.org; lhartgrave@NMPPENERGY.org; dpettinger@oppd.com; transprov@oppd.com; aivars.saukants@pacificorp.com; david.cory@pacificorp.com; dick.dowdy@pacificorp.com; lori.wisbeck@pacificorp.com; Theresa.Andres@pacificorp.com; jthomas@pnm.com; dean.luciuk@powerex.com; malcolm.stewart@powerex.com; marzena.piotrowicz@powerex.com; michelle.hiley@powerex.com; 24hourdesk@powersrc.com; dmpetritz@pplmt.com; jswilliamson@pplmt.com; btomsky@rmgci.com; kamurdoc@srpnet.com; provo.slynsky@state.ut.us; bhorton@tnsk.com; csamson@tnsk.com; slong@tnsk.com; ariella_weis@transalta.com; clint_korchinski@transalta.com; jade_ward@transalta.com; john_esiaw@transalta.com; Karen_Pelley@transalta.com; keith_I_taylor@transalta.com; marzena_plotrowica@transalta.com; meghana_bhat@transalta.com; Murray_Hnatyshyn@transalta.com; wayne_young@transalta.com; mikthe@tristategt.org; shasch@tristategt.org; terry@uamps.com; cevans@utilicorp.com; cherry.smith@williams.com; cyndy.mielke@williams.com; james.donaldson@willliams.com; cliff.barker@xemkt.com
Subject:	Loss Tag Reminder

Transmission Customers:

The Western Area Colorado Missouri control area (WACM) has just implemented a new scheduling package and thought this would be a good time to offer a reminder about how loss energy tags for delivery to WACM are to be completed.

1.  Please ensure that "WACM" is the last PSE on the tag.  This is important as it provides proper credit to the Transmission Customer for losses delivered.
2.  In the 'Comments' field, please put the words "WACM Losses".  If the tags are for a real-time transaction from the previous week, please indicate the date; i.e., "WACM Losses for MM/DD/YY".
3.  Prescheduled transactions require a concurrent tagging of loss energy to WACM.
4.  Real-time transactions require a return of loss energy to be accomplished same day, next week, same profile.
5.  It is allowable to combine losses due in any day/week/month/season on a single tag if that is easier for you to do so.  WACM calculates the amount of loss energy due from a Transmission Customer per day based on prescheduled transaction losses due on Day 0, plus real-time transaction losses due from day -7.

We are working with WACM Operations staff to see if, with the new scheduling software implemented, we will be able to accept real-time transaction loss energy concurrent with the real-time transaction.  If we are able to effect that change, it will be posted on OASIS and we will get an e-mail off to you immediately.

In the meantime, if you have any questions, please give me a call or send an e-mail.

Lynn Richardson
Public Utilities Specialist
RMR
(970) 461-7440


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/17/99 11:31
AM ---------------------------

Robert Quick
09/17/99 04:50 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Trader Guidelines

Sara, here are the trader guidelines I developed for UK gas, UK power and
Nordic power.  I assume you need both gas and power. These are to some extent
country or market specific. As these guidelines need to be approved by
Houston, I am copying this to Mark, Alan and Jeff. tks

Sara Shackleton
09/16/99 09:48 PM
To: Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Trader Guidelines

Mark Elliott tells me that you drafted some trader guidelines (physical and
financial) for the London traders.  I am trying to develop similar guidelines
for the Southern Cone regions (first Argentina) and thought your expertise
would be very helpful.  Could you send me a set?  I'm leaving for Sao Paulo
on Saturday but I will be in the office tomorrow.  Thank you for your help.
Regards.  Sara


Thanks for the invitation, but I cannot make it on Friday.  Have a great
time.  Mark


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001
05:36 PM ---------------------------

John Henderson@NEWPOWER

02/16/2001 03:32 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Wharton Tm #3 Presentation

Vince, scanned through.  Looks like a good start.

Thanks

John Henderson

----- Forwarded by John Henderson/HOU/NewPower on 02/16/2001 03:32 PM -----

	Vince J Kaminski@ECT
	02/16/2001 09:56 AM

		 To: John Henderson/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: Wharton Tm #3 Presentation

John,

Did you have a chance to take a look at his presentation?

Any comments?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001
09:55 AM ---------------------------

"Cummins, Marc" <marcjc@wharton.upenn.edu> on 02/15/2001 01:36:16 PM
To: "'Christie.Patrick@enron.com'" <Christie.Patrick@enron.com>,
Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, Melinda.McCarty@enron.com, "'Li.Sun@enron.com'"
<Li.Sun@enron.com>, "'john.henderson@newpower.com'"
<john.henderson@newpower.com>
cc: "Thorne, Heather" <hethorne@wharton.upenn.edu>, "DeGiacinto, Clayton"
<degiacic@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Lessar, Stephen"  <lessars@wharton.upenn.edu>,
"Vittal, Maheshram"  <mvittal@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Bassal, Omar"
<bassalo@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Feerick, Dennis" <dennisf@wharton.upenn.edu>,
"Cummins, Marc"  <marcjc@wharton.upenn.edu>, "'thomas@wharton.upenn.edu'"
<thomas@wharton.upenn.edu>
Subject: Wharton Tm #3 Presentation

Vince and Christie,

Here are the read ahead slides for today's teleconference.  Also attached is
the first draft of our Conjoint Analysis survey.  We'll see you this
afternoon.

 <<Enron Pres #3.ppt>>  <<NewPower Conjoint.doc>>

Sincerely,

Team 3

 - Enron Pres #3.ppt
 - NewPower Conjoint.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000
12:57 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tina Tennant                           03/06/2000 10:24 AM

To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deal List


Attached is the document with both Susan's and my comments.  Please
incorporate into your final draft.


I'm available.  I have another call at 10 AM PST.

Jeff

	Jan M King@ECT
	03/21/2001 10:21 AM

		 To: jbennett@gmssr.com, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, pgboylston@stoel.com, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mollie Gustafson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Conference call regarding CDWR - CPUC

Christian would like to have a conference call this morning as soon as
possible regarding CDWR - CPUC that will last approx. 1/2 to 1 hour.  He is
not available during the hour from 10 to 11 PST.  Please let me know your
availability.  Thanks.


Hi,
?
How is the family???? and the multiple jobs??????
?
We just got back from Omaha --- Linda's 40th High School  reunion. I wish
someone would explain to me who all those old people were that  attended.
?
Putting $1.85 a gallon gas in that beast of hers was sure fun.  I may need a
part-time job if this keeps up long. (Just kidding -- you probably  have
enough to deal with -- right)
?
Jennifer has decided to journey off to Law school at Baylor.  She and Linda
are going to Waco Friday to finalize an apartment.
Chris is managing the I-10 Texas Land & Cattle store.  Keeps him very busy.
(can't even send an e-mail ----- like someone else I know)  (Just kidding)
?
We are looking for property on a lake (Linda's request). Like  there is
anything like that left in Texas. We will probably drop in this  house.
?
Pretty quiet here all things considered.
?
Drop me a line or give me a call when you have some time. Or  if you are
really free we could actually plan a lunch. The price of natural gas  should
help keep Tom from hassling you too much.
?
Ken


Jay,
Attached is my spreadsheet that quantifies the benefit, given current pricing, of rolling the MPC storage to next winter.

Tyrell


This is CUBR's draft press release that will be sent out Tuesday (Oct. 5).
Let me know if you have any comments.

Thanks - Jeff


Sheung,
I am resending this e-mail to you.
As soon as we have an account number for EDIDE we will give you a letter to
transfer Shares as a contribution from EPCA  to EDIDE.
We will send a separate letter for instructions for EDIDE to convert the ADRs
to ordinary Class B Shares.
Thanks. Sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 03:10
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Glover                           05/25/2000 11:02 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Lowry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa T Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aneela Charania/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, sheung.tam@ms.com
cc:
Subject: Enron de Inversiones de Energia S.C.A. (an Argentine company) (EDIDE)

---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000 11:00
AM ---------------------------

Rafael Rangel@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/25/2000 10:48 AM
To: Sheila Glover@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Danthea Dumayas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
florencia.groppo@hds.com.ar, Veronica
Perez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Contacts

Corrections to #4 below.  Originally had EPCA, should be EDIDE.

RFR

Rafael Rangel
05/25/2000 10:20 AM
To: Sheila Glover@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Don Overby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Danthea Dumayas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
florencia.groppo@hds.com.ar>, Veronica Perez

Subject: Re: Contacts

Sheila, as discussed yesterday, I need to do the following:

Open a brokerage account at Morgan Stanley for Enron de Inversiones de
Energia S.C.A. (an Argentine company) (EDIDE)
This account will hold ADRs that will be contributed or transferred into its
account by Enron Pipeline Company-Argentina S.A.  (EPCA)(account #038-088357)
at Morgan Stanley.
EPCA will contribute 431,300 ADRs in Transportadora Gas del Sur (TGS) into
EDIDE's new account.  That contribution represents the capital contribution
that EPCA is obligated to make under the capital increase resolution dated
February 20th, 2000.
After the ADR's are transferred into EDIDE's accounts, EDIDE will need to
convert such ADR's into ordinary Class B shares in TGS so that they can be
registered accordingly in Argentina.

Sheila, I am forwarding a hard copy of this e-mail with appropriate support
(corporate resolutions authorizing me to open this account, resolution
authorizing the increase in capital and some forms that I had Eduardo
Ojea-Quintana (President of EDIDE) sign).

Please review and advise of what else you need to finalize this transaction.

Best Regards,

RFR

---------------------- Forwarded by Rafael Rangel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
05/25/2000 09:50 AM ---------------------------

Rafael Rangel
05/24/2000 05:50 PM
To: Sheila Glover@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Danthea Dumayas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Contacts

Sheila, finally ready to open up the account at Morgan Stanley for EDIDE so
that EPCA can transfer the correct amount of ADRs.  I have the Corporate
Resolution from EDIDE.  I understand that the contact at Morgan Stanley has
changed.  Please advise.

RFR

To: Danthea Dumayas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rafael
Rangel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Contacts

I will be out on maternity leave soon (hopefully).  In my absence, please
call Sheila Glover (3-3210) for any questions that you may have.  If you just
need a copy of an old report, please call Aneela Charania at 3-0951.

Thanks,

Terri
3-9899


Whatever happened to this?

	Michael A Robison
	01/10/2001 09:15 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Dugas

Richard:
Please review per my voicemail.
Thanks,
Mike
EB3847
(713) 853-6667 DID
(713) 646-4842 FAX

----- Forwarded by Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 09:14 AM -----

	Michael A Robison
	01/09/2001 11:25 PM

		 To: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Goughary/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted
Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Dugas

I 've been tied up with the Envera deal so I have not had much time to draft
the attached letter.  It is very direct and you may want to take a different
approach.  Let's discuss.

Mike
EB3847
(713) 853-6667 DID
(713) 646-4842 FAX


Dear PIRA Client:

The following Current News & Analysis articles have been published on PIRA's
website:

1) October Weather: Europe/Japan Very Warm, US Tepid
2) Worldwide Refinery Capacity Review
3) US Alaskan Crude Production Up From 3Q Trough
4) Marginal Refinery Capacity In Europe - The Case Of Italy

Please go to http://www.pira.com

These articles can be found in the Client section of PIRA's website. You
will need a PIRA Online account in order to gain access. For account
information please contact Dyana Rothman, drothman@pira.com or at
212-686-6808.

Best regards,

PIRA Energy Group


Mark--

Looks good. I'd suggest changing "EnronOnline website" in the first paragraph to the broader "EnronOnline eMarketplace platform" just to be safe.

-MP
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shelby, Rex
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:04 PM
To:	Greenberg, Mark; Palmer, Mark S. (ENW)
Cc:	Koehler, Anne C.; Jones, Tana; Wax, Brandon
Subject:	RE: SunGard

Mark --

This looks fine to me.  I believe that Henry Bonner of SunGard is travelling tonight and will be in Houston tomorrow.  He left a message saying that he will call with the hotel fax number when he gets to his destination.  I will forward that information as soon as I receive it so that we can get the NDA  and signed letter to him.  Henry's cell phone number is 917 373 5844 (Cell).  Thanks.

-- Rex

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Greenberg, Mark
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:58 PM
To:	Shelby, Rex; Palmer, Mark S. (ENW)
Cc:	Koehler, Anne C.; Jones, Tana
Subject:	SunGard
Importance:	High

Rex/Mark -

As we discussed, I am not confident that the Automated Securities Clearance NDA sufficiently covers us in this new matter.  I have called Henry Bonner at SunGard to verify the legal structure to see if we can or cannot use it; however, he has yet to return my call.

I have prepared the attached based upon a belief that we should have in place an NDA specifically with SunGard Trading & Risk Systems.  Because we also want to move this matter forward, I have attached to the agreement a "Schedule A" in which I have outlined the work that SunGard will be performing for us - at least at the onset.  If we go beyond the first five days of this work, we should definitely have a formal consulting agreement signed to ensure we have a clear path forward on the work to be done and deliverables to be provided.

In the meantime, please take a look at the attached and let me know if this works.

Thanks.

mark

 << File: nda - sungardtrading&risksystems(10-31-01).doc >>