Just a submittal although there may be an actual meeting with Mr. Paige.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Kimberly (ETS)
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:21 PM
To:	Ratner, Michael; Hayslett, Rod; Soldano, Louis; Chavez, Gabriel
Subject:	RE: Education Dep't testimony.

Attached are my changes and comments.

Michael, are you going to be reading this in person, or is this just to sumbit to the Dept. of Education?

Kimberly

 << File: Ratner-PaigeTestimony 103101 - Kimberly's revisions.doc >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
05:02 PM ---------------------------

KRuscitti@aol.com on 01/06/2000 05:29:38 PM
To: Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Dogs

Return-path: KRuscitti@aol.com
From: KRuscitti@aol.com
Full-name: KRuscitti
Message-ID: <0.12be7f0f.25a39dc5@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 14:02:29 EST
Subject: Dogs
To: lisa.a.tagert@jci.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part2_a3.a3c6b9ea.25a39dc5_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 18

cccc

 - DCP00617.BMP


---------------------- Forwarded by Amanda Huble/NA/Enron on 12/08/2000 11:13
AM ---------------------------

Vanessa Schulte
12/08/2000 11:14 AM
To: Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christy Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky
Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Laura Harder/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kimberly
Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amanda Huble/NA/Enron@Enron, Claudette Harvey/HOU/ECT@ect,
Judy Martinez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Gardner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tamara Jae
Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jewell Wade/NA/Enron@Enron, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Douglas Allen/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: EnTelligence Training Available Tuesday

Please forward to your groups...

EnTelligence training now available!
Date: Tuesday, Dec 12
Time: 3:00 and 4:00
Location: EB 572

Please stop by to learn more about the system or just get a demo of what it
can do for you!!!

Overview

EnTelligence is a web-based prospecting tool designed to deliver market
information on existing and potential customers to commercial trading,
mid-marketing, and origination teams.  It also delivers management reports to
analyze Enron,s position within the key industries that we serve.  Presently,
commercial groups have multiple methods for acquiring potential customer
information.  This system will standardize their resource tools and add
consistency to their prospecting processes.  EnTelligence combines
information from internal databases such as Global Counterparty, Credit
Aggregation System (CAS), Sitara, and ERMS with information from external
data sources such as Dun & Bradstreet and I.H.S Energy Reporter to identify
customer prospects.  By providing the capability to filter and search by
region, industry, company size, or energy consumption levels, the prospecting
process is shortened and the identification of strong prospects improved.
Available reports include Market Penetration, Industry Prospecting,
Comparison Prospecting, Company Profiles, Family Tree, Top Customers, and
Inactive Accounts.  Soon to come is the Activity Details report in mid
January.  Currently only Natural Gas and Power physical deals are loaded, but
financial deals will be included in mid January, and new products are soon to
follow.  Please submit a request for access through eRequest and then log on
at http://entelligence.enron.com.


The attached legal report summarizes current significant legal activities of
Enron Energy Services as of November 15, 2000.  This report does not attempt
to list all transactions or include reference to ongoing maintenance of
completed transactions.  Additional and/or more detailed information is
available on request.  (Red lined copy also attached for your convenience.)

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT
Do not distribute this report unless you have prior approval from Enron
Energy Services' Legal Department.

Should you have any difficulty with the attachments, please call.

Thank you,
Leasa Lopez
713-853-6899


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

November 9, 2001 5:00pm through November 12, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI:         SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER:     ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  SAP                 POSTPONED
Time:  Fri 11/9/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at    2:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 11/9/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at  12:00:00 AM PT
	Sat 11/10/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sun 11/11/2001 at  8:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Add New SAP Storage
Environments Impacted:  SAP
Purpose: Disk growth in SAP required procurement of additional disk.
Backout: Revert to current configuration.
Contact(s): 	Gary Sentiff    713-345-5125

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sun 11/11/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at  9:30:00 PM CT
	Sun 11/11/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at  7:30:00 PM PT
	Sun 11/11/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Mon 11/12/2001 at  3:30:00 AM London
Outage:  CPR
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose:  CPR routine database maintenance
Backout:
Contact(s): 	CPR Support    (713) 284-4175

SITARA:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 11/10/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at  7:00:00 AM CT
	Sat 11/10/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at  5:00:00 AM PT
	Sun 11/11/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sun 11/11/2001 at  1:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Sitara and CPR
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: Sitara and CPR routine database maintenance
Backout:
Contact(s): 	CPR Support    (713) 284-4175
		Sitara on Call    (713) 288-0101

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


Rick,

Just wanted to give you a "heads up" that I will be digging around the DOJ
regarding satellite issues as we have a potential antitrust issue on that
front.  According to Fred Enochs (runs the satellite book for Fallon),
satellite providers (and there are only a few of them to begin with) will not
sell capacity to EBS unless we agree to their contractual terms regarding
resale -- i.e., we cannot resell any satellite capacity that the provider
sells to EBS.  As we are interested in trading satellite capacity, this type
of restriction prevents players like EBS from creating/entering new markets
for resale.  I have already touched base with Jade and she has promised to
find the appropriate person for me to talk to.

FYI: Fallon would like to see this prohibition attacked as well.  The three
of us have discussed it.  I advised Fred that I would need either a contract
from one of the providers that includes the restrictive language or some
correspondence (e-mail or regular mail) that documents this activity; he is
working on it.  As it turns out, Jamie Ginsberg's new company contacted EBS
about satellite capacity and she related similar information to Fred
regarding her own experiences with satellite providers.  As a result, we may
be able to gather some useful information from her that we could reference at
the DOJ to support our case.

I'll keep you posted as further developments arise.

Hope you're enjoying San Antonio.

Lara

P.S.
Are you around at all tomorrow or next week?


Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042923.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/29/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_4C
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


In order to terminate the referenced agreement we need to provide notice 180 days in advance of the end of the primary term or any annual extension.
Based upon a May 1, 1997 in service date for the Havasu facililties, the primary term of this agreement terminates on April 30, 2002. We need to provide notice by October 31, 2001 of our intent to trigger the ROFR process (see attached).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Stephanie


Happy New Year!!

Our weekly conference calls will resume Monday, January 8 at 11:15 central.
The number is 888-311-9051 and the passcode is 60396.


Attached is a clean and redlined copy.  Mark,  Please note Russell Diamond
with credit wants to initial these contracts before credit will approve the
transaction from ENA's side.  I will send him the latest drafts.


FYI:  Per Brent Hendry, I am forwarding to you'all the following
comparisons.-Becky

	Becky Spencer@ECT
	03/05/2001 10:10 AM

		 To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: comparison

See attached comparisons:

=======================================================

	Brent Hendry@ENRON
	03/05/2001 09:45 AM

		 To: Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: comparison

I need a comparison of these two sets of documents.  I need to know how the
more recent documents changed from the last drafts.  Thanks.


Do you have a list of new curves for UBS.  They will only be taking over history for the curves we will continue to load.

Kam

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wong, Jeremy
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:21 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Cc:	Lim, Francis S.; Stock, Steve
Subject:	FW: UBS curves

Kam:

We would also need Calgary's list of curves/pub. codes to move to NetCo/UBS - could
you provide the list also?

Jeremy
x3-0573

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stock, Steve
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:09 PM
To:	Wong, Jeremy
Subject:	FW: UBS curves

What's the status Jeremy.....?

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wei, Zhiyong
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:41 PM
To:	Stock, Steve
Cc:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	RE: UBS curves

Steve,

Kam has asked about the status of the below request. Would you please provide her with the update?

Thanks

Zhiyong

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wei, Zhiyong
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:58 PM
To:	Wong, Jeremy
Cc:	Stock, Steve
Subject:	FW: UBS curves

Jeremy,

Please make appropriate changes to the NETCO ERMS database for the following requests. What needs to be done is to delete all other curve entries in the egs_curve_def and egs_curve points and egs_pub_names which are not listed in the attached file. I will talk to you about it.

Thanks

Zhiyong

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:40 PM
To:	Wei, Zhiyong
Subject:	UBS curves

 Zhiyong,

We have decided to take the curve history with us to UBS for the attached curves.  We have changed the names for some of the curves so column J has additional curves that we would like to bring history.  We will not continue publishing those in the future however.

Thanks

Kam

 << File: Netco Curves.xls >>


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Parking & Transportation
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:41 PM
To:	Vuittonet, Laura
Subject:	RE: Clay Garage Parking

Laurie,

Mr. Parks is fine where he is, he does not have to move from the Clay garage, if you have any further questions, you can cotact Martin Katz at x5-9322, his location is ECN306.

Thank you,
Parking & Transportation


Dan,
This was response from Tom on question about  the deal # for Bug contract 414
on Tenn that you were unable to terminate.  I've cleaned up the other 3 deals
he mentioned.
Brenda
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2000
11:56 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Thomas Engel                           05/17/2000 11:27 AM

To: Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Sitara Deal 77563

Somehow they broke the program rules - I will have to check that out - deal
229101 was supposed to be ENA-IM EAST as a secondary desk to the BUG deal.
They were able to save it as BUG as the secondary - which they should not be
able to do - as this breaks the one deal rule per business unit per contract
per time perod.

I cleaned up the deals for you - it is the only way I could make sure it
worked - and removed the evergreen flag off the the BUG deal.

There are 3 more deals that have May forward activity - can you follow up on
these - don't forget to cancel the evergreen on the service deals or they
will just keep rolling.

---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2000 11:09
AM ---------------------------

Brenda H Fletcher
05/17/2000 09:23 AM
To: Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Sitara Deal 77563

Deal # 77563 is a Transport Capacity ticket for a BUG contract which needs to
end 3/31/00.  I have been unable to change the end date to 3/31/00 or change
the demand to zero beginning 4/1/00.  When I try to release after editing the
deal, this message appears. How can I get deal 77563 terminated?
Thanks,
Brenda


Dear Steve,

This week George Wasaff, Allan Sommer, PriceWaterhouse, and I showed Rick
Buy, Rick Causey, and Philippe Bibi the HP portal demonstration.  Each
reacted favorably. We are scheduled to show Cindy Olson next week.   Sound
bytes below.

Philippe Bibi ) 2/28/01
Philippe said, &I like this.  Let,s get a proposal from PW.8

&This portal initiative must be justified not on savings, but on
functionality.  Savings is zero value.  Soft savings are impossible to
measure.  Bridge the firewall.  Marie, Allan, and George put together a cost
analysis.8

Rick Causey ) 2/27/01
Rick said the HP portal, &hits the nail on the head.  Let me know how it goes
with Philippe, matter of fact I will try and attend tomorrow,s meeting with
Philippe.8

Rick Causey would like to attend the HP off site visit with Steve.  Further,
he suggested if Philippe concurs, he would like Steve, Philippe and him to
meet with Jeff Skilling to pitch the project.  George Wasaff suggested he
include Mark Frevert in this meeting.

Rick Buy 2/27/01
Rick had a favorable response to the HP portal.  He sees the HP portal as a
productivity exercise.

More Sound Bytes from Executive Sponsor Follow Up Meetings

Philippe Bibi ) 2/28/01
After PW reviewed a number of portal applications, Philippe said they were
good but not difficult.  He requested to see transaction process and single
sign on applications.  PW showed Philippe their Travel application.  PW
emphasized this was the only way employees could schedule travel.
Previously, employees would call the 800 number and incur a ~$100.00 charge.
The online portal applications reduced the charge to $12.00.

PW emphasized Chrysler was spending $200.00 million per year in training.
The portal provided a skills inventory application which resulted in reducing
the training expenditures down to $100 million per year.  Philippe could see
how this would be of value in a blue-collar environment but could not see the
value in our environment.

Philippe asked PW if they could demonstrate an application which was not
something shrink wrapped off the shelf.  PW showed him their stock option
application and the training application.

PW emphasized HP had 83 autonomous Business Units which needed to be united
under this portal.  Every day 90% of HP global employees access the portal.
Why?  The portal is the only way to access a number of job related
applications.

Philippe asked about ad hoc reports.  He said Enron has a problem getting ad
hoc reports.  He said canned reports are not very useful.  Further, he cannot
get a quick ad hoc report of all the consultants currently billing and at
what expense.

Philippe said the ability to get in to SAP is a drawback.  How did HP address
applications that were not web enabled?  Content management tools like iClick
and interwoven were used as delivery mechanisms for making enhanced
applications available via the web.

Philippe said this is a vehicle to pull together travel, ibuyit, Paine
Webber, Benefits, facilities, aviation, conference/video calls.  What about
the guy who is doing trading, logistics, settlements, transactions with the
pipelines?  Could this portal provide for that person?  Philippe sees the
only benefit for this person would be the single sign on.

Philippe said, &Let me stress three things:  1)  we have a series of
initiatives click@home, IM Task Force, Data Repository 2)  Enron is not that
disciplined.  We don,t want to get in the middle of policing publication of
information over the web (Per Clay, Interwoven allows other BU/Fus to
publish), 3)  From an infrastructure perspective, the number of servers we
run as far as web servers, we run them clustered.8

This portal initiative must be justified not on savings, but on
functionality.  Savings is zero value.  Soft savings are impossible to
measure.  &Bridge the firewall.8  Marie, Allan, and George put together a
cost analysis.

Use PW as the catalyst.

Philippe said we would need processes around security.  Philippe would like
to understand how HP did this.  Philippe would like to see how to gap the
bridges.  He is in favor of taking customer applications and making them
available from a single sign on.

Philippe recommended Allan Sommer, George Wasaff and Marie Hejka get together
and come up with about 80% of the cost analysis information which otherwise
might have been developed during the two day workshop.  Philippe recommends
stopping other projects and focusing on this project.

Rick Causey 3/01/01
Rick said the HP portal, &hits the nail on the head.  Let me know how it goes
with Philippe, matter of fact I will try and attend the meeting.8

Rick Causey would like to attend the HP off site visit with Steve.  Further,
he suggested if Philippe concurs, he would like Steve, Philippe and him to
meet with Jeff Skilling to pitch the project.  George Wasaff suggested he
include Mark Frevert in this meeting.

Rick see a few hurdles 1) getting buy in from all the companies 2) getting
buy in from Jeff Skilling 3) getting buy in from the technical side.

Also, noted is that Carly stopped 30 plus projects of web development to
focus on this effort.

The portal should include a forced information space to introduce new portal
applications.

Rick Buy 3/01/01
Rick had a favorable response to the HP portal.  He sees the HP portal as a
productivity exercise.  How productive can this portal make Enron employees?
Rick sees the single sign on, single launch pad as valuable.  PW reviewed to
Rick the value in cost savings 1) headcount reduction 2) hardware reduction
3) duplicate site reduction.


---------------------- Forwarded by Russell Ballato/NA/Enron on 03/02/2001
03:23 PM ---------------------------

Massimo Marolo <mmarolo@houstontech.org> on 03/02/2001 03:08:09 PM
To: "'vladi.pimenov@enron.com'" <vladi.pimenov@enron.com>
cc: "'cames@enron.com'" <cames@enron.com>, "'nblackbu@enron.com'"
<nblackbu@enron.com>, "'sgandhi@enron.com'" <sgandhi@enron.com>,
"'rballato@enron.com'" <rballato@enron.com>

Subject: FW: TGIF

Hope this is the start to a great weekend for you.

John

 - Swimsu~1.pps


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000 04:01 PM -----

	John Enerson
	11/15/2000 02:42 PM

		 To: Lisa King/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Ice Drilling

Lisa - The attached schedule calculates interest on overdue interest at the
9.9% rate.  This is fine except that I do not know if we are able to charge
interest on overdue interest.  That is Richard Sanders call - Richard, please
let us know.  If we can charge interest on interest, this schedule is fine.
Otherwise, we will have to recalculate using simple interest.

Lisa King
11/15/2000 02:19 PM
To: John Enerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Ice Drilling

John-

Attached is the schedule that we had at Monday's meeting which has been
updated through 10/31/00.   After looking more closely at the schedule and
the way it is calculating interest, it appears that interest is being
compounded.  The estimate that we had used in Monday's meeting was simple
interest for one year calculated on the sum of $1,061,300.90 and $264,452.89
(October 1999 values) which equated to roughly $131,246.65.  However,  based
on the schedule's calculation, I believe the total interest and principal due
is $1,171,585.67.  Please look over this schedule and see if you agree with
my thinking.

Thank you,
Lisa


Today is my day at the spa.  THere will be a temp covering my desk this
afternoon.

Tana,  I have left a voice mail for Kerrie James X35792 to deliver the
samples to you.  By the way when is the party.  I did not get an invitation.

tm


A payment test file was sent to the bank in error and, as a result, a deposit
was posted on Monday, July 10, 2000.  This impacts only employees who utilize
direct deposits (ACH) and are paid semi-monthly.

To correct this situation, on Tuesday, July 11, 2000 a withdrawal of the
amount deposited will be processed.  Your bank may not post this transaction
until Wednesday, July 12, 2000.

If you have any questions, please call (713) 345-5555.  We apologize for any
inconvenience.


Kate this is a new file as of 2:30 today.  The previous one was from this
morning.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Confer/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 03:18
PM ---------------------------
To: Mark Confer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: latest file

see attached.

bc


Dear Mr Lay,

I'm not sure if you remember, but I am the one who came up with the Lay it
on the Line slogan.  I am no longer with the company and am currently with
General Electric.
Regardless, I still have a stake in Enron.  Besides everything that is going
on that we can all read in the press, what concerns me is it seems that some
current leaders still don't care.  I was infuriated to learn that Enron (EES
in particular) still rented a corporate house on the golf course for the
tour championship in Houston and was seen grilling steaks, lobsters and
having a great time.   I wouldn't consider it entertaining clients if
Managing Directors such as Dan Leff were there with thier kids (rumor has
it).  That is a completely irresponsible waste of what little money is left
in the company and it shows the arrogance that Enron is perceived to have.
People should be fired for this.   I would hope that Christmas parties,
bonues etc will be scaled down this year and to at least make some sort of
effort to slash costs and get the company back on track.  I have faith in
you as a leader and I hope for a turnaround.  Thank you.


I e-mailed Whalley that we are doing nothing with EOL except supporting NewCo for now.

GP

-----Original Message-----
From:	Richter, Brad
Sent:	Fri 12/7/2001 10:57 AM
To:	Piper, Greg
Cc:
Subject:	FW: EOL Source Code

Further to my voicemail.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:00 AM
To: Richter, Brad
Subject: RE: EOL Source Code

Piper is incorrect in the sense there is no decision on who owns the code or licence yet.

EOL is not for sale today.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richter, Brad
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 9:47 AM
To: Kitchen, Louise
Subject: FW: EOL Source Code

Here's my permission, in case you're interested.

If you want ENW to work in the same direction as you, let us know what the goal is beforehand.  You know I've tried to communicate.

-----Original Message-----
From: Piper, Greg
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 6:48 PM
To: Pickering, Mark
Cc: Beck, Sally; Richter, Brad
Subject: Re: EOL Source Code

Talk with richter and louise together if possible. Initially newco would only get an exclusive license for gas and power and not the code but I think creditors should have options so brad is still looking at determining eol value outside of a newco deal.
Greg Piper


price for gas sold 5/25 - 5/28  $2.7550
Sold 10,000 for 5/29 at gas daily waha - $.05 which is $2.7700
Sold 10,500 for 5/30 at gas daily waha - $.05 which is $2.8750
Sold 15,000 for 5/31 at gas daily waha - $.05 which is $2.9750

Karen, Theresa, all the sales data for May is in the attached worksheet under "may02".

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Friday, May 24, 2002 10:41 AM
To:	Barbe, Robin; Mazowita, Mike; Kelly, Katherine L.; Denetsosie, Troy; Brady, Kevin
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Ponderosa Sales to TXU for May 2002

sold 10,000 for 5/24 at gas daily waha - $.05 which is $3.035

 and 10,000 for 5/25 - 5/28 at gas daily waha - $.05

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barbe, Robin
Sent:	Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:21 PM
To:	Barbe, Robin; Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Kelly, Katherine L.; Denetsosie, Troy; Brady, Kevin
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Ponderosa Sales to TXU for May 2002

	the gas price for the 5000 for gas day 5/22 is $2.985.  i sold txu 10MM for 5/23 at gas daily waha - $0.05 again.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barbe, Robin
Sent:	Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:38 AM
To:	Barbe, Robin; Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Kelly, Katherine L.; Denetsosie, Troy; Brady, Kevin
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Ponderosa Sales to TXU for May 2002

	the gas price for the 6500 for 5/21 is $3.095.  sold txu 5000 for gas day 5/22 at waha gas daily avg - $0.05.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barbe, Robin
Sent:	Monday, May 20, 2002 10:05 AM
To:	Barbe, Robin; Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Kelly, Katherine L.; Denetsosie, Troy; Brady, Kevin
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Ponderosa Sales to TXU for May 2002

	sold 6500 to txu @ cayanosa for 5/21.  price is waha gas daily avg - $0.05.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barbe, Robin
Sent:	Friday, May 17, 2002 9:54 AM
To:	Barbe, Robin; Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Kelly, Katherine L.; Denetsosie, Troy; Brady, Kevin
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Ponderosa Sales to TXU for May 2002

	sold 10,000 to txu at  cayanosa at a price of $3.01 for the 5/18, 19, & 20.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barbe, Robin
Sent:	Thursday, May 16, 2002 2:19 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Barbe, Robin; Kelly, Katherine L.; Denetsosie, Troy; Brady, Kevin
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Ponderosa Sales to TXU for May 2002

	Here's an update on the status of sells to TXU:

	Sold 10,000 dth of Cinergy/Cayanosa for the following gas days and prices:
	     5/14 @ $3.26
	     5/15 @ $3.345   waha gda - $0.05
	     5/16 @ $3.12     waha gda - $0.05
	     5/17 @ $3.02

	If you have any questions, I can be reached at 713-853-7177.

	Robin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Friday, May 10, 2002 1:06 PM
To:	Barbe, Robin
Subject:	FW: Ponderosa Sales to TXU for May 2002

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mazowita, Mike
Sent:	Friday, May 10, 2002 11:26 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Ponderosa Sales to TXU for May 2002

Thanks. I will see on Monday how Brazos ran the plant over the weekend and take a course of action from there. At least 10,000 -15,000 to market.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Friday, May 10, 2002 10:39 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Barbe, Robin; Kelly, Katherine L.; Denetsosie, Troy; Brady, Kevin
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Ponderosa Sales to TXU for May 2002

We did not sell any gas for May 8th-10th.

Sold TXU 5,000 dth of Cinergy/Cayanosa for 5/11-13/02 at $3.32.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:44 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Barbe, Robin; Kelly, Katherine L.; Denetsosie, Troy; Brady, Kevin
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Ponderosa Sales to TXU for May 2002

For gas day 5/7/02, Cinergy/Apache moved 10,000 dth from Sid Rich Cayanosa to Oasis Mi Vida.  Oasis Mi Vida is not a Lone Star point but I didn't know it at the time and I sold the gas to TXU at $3.20.  No sales were made for 5/8/02.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Friday, May 03, 2002 5:17 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Barbe, Robin; Kelly, Katherine L.; Denetsosie, Troy; Brady, Kevin
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Ponderosa Sales to TXU for May 2002

Sold TXU 10,000 dth of Cayanosa for 5/2/02 at $3.51.

Sold TXU 10,000 dth of Cayanosa for 5/3/02 at $3.36.

Sold TXU 10,000 dth of Cayanosa for 5/4-6/02 at $3.18.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, April 30, 2002 2:12 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Barbe, Robin; Kelly, Katherine L.; Denetsosie, Troy; Brady, Kevin
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	Ponderosa Sales to TXU for May 2002

Sold TXU 10,000 dth of Cayanosa for 5/1/02 at $3.45.  I actually sold TXU the gas yesterday and I didn't want to change the volumes for the 1st.  Let me know if you want to sell more than 10,000 for the 2nd.

Thanks


Start Date: 1/12/02; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011215.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000 03:15
PM ---------------------------

"Pete Cervin" <pcervin@br-inc.com> on 07/18/2000 01:09:51 PM
Please respond to <pcervin@br-inc.com>
To: <jane.m.tholt@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: fwd: FW: Pooling Technical Subcommittee Meeting

See attached.
---------- Original Text ----------

From: "Royal, Kathleen S." <RoyalK@EPEnergy.com>, on 7/18/00 12:17 PM:
To: ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'bcantre@enron.com'"
<bcantre@enron.com>],ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'skinnml@texaco.com'"
<skinnml@texaco.com>],ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'rfoss@coral-energy.com'"
<rfoss@coral-energy.com>],ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'tcarlson@apsc.com'"
<tcarlson@apsc.com>],ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'pwri@dynegy.com'"
<pwri@dynegy.com>],ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'gcvenz@duke-energy.com'"
<gcvenz@duke-energy.com>],ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'petersdd@bp.com'"
<petersdd@bp.com>],ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'john.hogan@southernenergy.com'"
<john.hogan@southernenergy.com>],ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'sam.brown@swgas.com'"
<sam.brown@swgas.com>],ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'rbetonte@socalgas.com'"
<rbetonte@socalgas.com>],ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'pwah@socalgas.com'"
<pwah@socalgas.com>],ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'carla.j.johnson@usa.conoco.com'"
<carla.j.johnson@usa.conoco.com>],ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'nicholas.e.rassinier@us
a
.conoco.com'"
<nicholas.e.rassinier@usa.conoco.com>],ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'rishikawa@socalgas
.
com'" <rishikawa@socalgas.com>]
Cc: ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["Walker, Norman E." <WalkerN@EPEnergy.com>]

> Attached is a summary of the Pooling Technical Subcommittee Meeting held
> last Friday, July 14, 2000 in El Paso.  Also attached are other documents
> used in the meeting to support the proposals discussed.

>
> Next Meeting:  8:00 AM, August 3, 2000 in Las Vegas, Nevada at Southwest
> Gas, 5241 Spring Mountain Road
>
>  Please RSVP by close of business Thursday (July 20) to Sam Brown so
> he can reserve the meeting room.
>  phone:  (702) 876-7010
>  e-mail:  sam.brown@swgas.com
>
>
>
>  <<Minutes of July 14 Pooling Meeting ELP1.doc>>  <<Pooling Point Daily
> Average Quantities 1999 and 2000.xls>>  <<Proposed Pooling Example.doc>>
> <<Alternate Pooling Example.doc>>  <<Proposals Matrix.doc>>
>
>
>

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************

 - Minutes of July 14 Pooling Meeting ELP1.doc
 - Pooling Point Daily Average Quantities 1999 and 2000.xls
 - Proposed Pooling Example.doc
 - Alternate Pooling Example.doc
 - Proposals Matrix.doc


Rod,

Please take a look at this and let me know if this is what you had in mind.  I only completed the revenue section for the WOT because the other three sections had prices that where not available.  Please review and let me know how you would like me to proceed.

Thanks
Sarah


ClickAtHome Pilot Two Members!

We hope your experience with the Clickathome ordering website and vendors has
been exciting and fun for you!  We need your feedback to determine next steps
of the program.  Please take 5 minutes to fill out the first of 3 surveys we
are asking Pilot members to complete.  Your feedback is critical to the
successful all employee launch next year.  Please complete the survey by
clicking on the link below by Friday, December 22.

http://etcsurvey.corp.enron.com/wi/p0263576/i.asp?r=142&s=HTUCKUKC&l=9

If you haven't ordered your PC yet, ordering closes Wednesday December 20th.

The ClickAtHome Project Team


Take a look at the rates for Cayman.  We should try to get a corporate
conference rate.  I will have Ina look into that possibility.  Cancun is not
an option in March and April - all booked.

Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 02/11/2001 01:38
PM ---------------------------

Ina Rangel
02/09/2001 05:09 PM
To: Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Info on Group Trip

Mike:

Here is what I found out so far:

Cancun

Continental  Thursday 3/29   depart at 3:37PM Sunday 4/1 return at 2:40PM
$969.00 per person
Continental  Thursday 3/29 depart at 3:37PM  Sunday 4/1 return at 6:36PM
$706.00 per person
Fun Jet    Thursday 3/29 depart at 7:00 AM Sunday 4/1 return at 10:00AM
$380.00 per person

Ritz sold out (still checking into it)
Fiesta Americana Coral Beach - Jr Suite Style approx. 300.00 a night

Cayman

Cayman Airways Thursday 3/29 depart at 1:45 PM  Sunday 4/1 return at 9:50
AM   $554.00
American Airlines Thursday 3/29  depart at 12:45 PM thru Miami arrive at 8:30
PM Sunday 4/1 7:07 AM thru Miami and arrive at 3:30 PM  $506

Hyatt:
 $675 a night for ocean view
$460 a night for regular room
 $575 for concierge level rooms

Westin:
$390.00 a night for Island View
$440 a night for Partial Ocean View
$500 a night for King Bed Ocean View

I will check with a couple of more travel agencies on Monday, but this is
what I have so far.  We will have to book the flights quickly because
availability is limited.

-Ina


Attached is the latest version of the Enron North America Legal phone list.
Please advise is any further revisions are required.


Ladies,

What's the status on this registration?  The customer is eager to receive
transaction status (calls fairly often so I would call that "eager").

Thanks,
Griff


Hi Sara, the above report includes all hourly financial power swaps that were
done in May.

Thanks,
Melissa
3-1886


Time is critical and your insight is essential for success.  If you haven't
already, please remember to complete the survey below.  The survey responses
are anonymous so everyone is receiving this reminder. Your input will help
shape future Enron information sharing systems. Please complete by noon on
Friday, December 8th.

Thanks again.

Sincerely,
Kent W. Morrison
KM Business Analyst Consultant

---------------------- Forwarded by Kent Morrison/NA/Enron on 12/07/2000
11:47 AM ---------------------------

Kent Morrison
12/06/2000 09:11 AM
To: Bob Sparger/Corp/Enron@Enron, Suzanne Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
Rogers/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jack
White/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Alexander Perwich/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Eric
Benson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Entman/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Dayna F Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Dawson/Govt.
Affairs/LON/ECT@ECT, Doug Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael J Miller/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, David
Gossett/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew
Parsons/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Medcalf/NA/Enron@Enron, Calvin
Eakins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Derryl Cleaveland/NA/Enron@ENRON, David
Johanson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
stephen.simpson@enron.com, norman_levine@enron.net, Rita Hartfield/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, ddelain2@enron.com
cc: Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Knowledge Management Pilot and Prototype Project

Please complete the Knowledge Management survey below.  You are being asked
to participate in this survey because your name was recommended during
one-on-one interviews conducted for the KM Pilot and Prototype project.
Please take a few minutes and complete this survey before noon on Friday,
December 8th.

Thank you in advance for your time and participation.

Sincerely,
Kent W. Morrison
KM Business Analyst Consultant

http://etcsurvey.corp.enron.com/wi/p0231745/i.asp


This in an automated e-mail sent out from the Commissioner.COM
web site.  Do not reply to this e-mail, but instead please visit
your league's site at http://football.commissioner.com/enron2000

-------------------------------------------------------------

Gary Lamphier requests the following transaction:.

  Drop Charles Johnson.
  Add Priest Holmes.

-------------------------------------------------------------

To approve this transaction, please go to your web site and
select Transactions, Requests in the Front Office.


Privileged and Confidential Joint Defense Communication

From:  Don Schultz
To:      Quinque  Defendants
Re:     Extension of time for discovery letter

Judge Downes' law clerk called to report that Judge Downes did not intend to
impose such scheduling duress on the Grynberg and Wright groups seeking to
coordinate on a discovery letter, so is granting us until the close of
business on Thursday to submit a coordinated letter reply.   A draft reply is
in process and should be circulated early tomorrow with requests for your
prompt feedback.  (Quinque defendants may not have a separate interest in the
discovery requested by Grynberg, but I am repeating this message for the
benefit of those in the email group who are not also counsel in the Grynberg
cases) Don.


Thanks

	Stuart Zisman 05/21/2001 02:15 PM 	   To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: Gordon Grimes

I spoke with Gordon.  The assets that he knew about were ones that we have already looked at.  I was very nice and told him that I was appreciative of his notifying us about them.

I owe him a call to tell him whether we are still pursuing these projects or whether we have given up on them.  Gordon wanted to be sure that we had no interest before bringing these projects to his other clients' attention.

Stuart


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/29/2000 11:05 AM -----

	"Markel, Gregory A." <GMarkel@brobeck.com>
	10/27/2000 02:45 PM

		 To: "'richard.b.sanders@enron.com'" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>, "Setton,
Ronit" <RSetton@brobeck.com>, "Markel, Gregory A." <GMarkel@brobeck.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: FirstWorld Document Preservation Memorandum

See below for categories of documents to be preserved.

Greg Markel
Brobeck Phleger & Harrison
1633 Broadway
New York, New York  10019
212-237-2592
Fax -212-586-7878
gmarkel@brobeck.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Setton, Ronit
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 11:53 AM
To: Markel, Gregory A.
Cc: Gugliucci, Patricia
Subject: FirstWorld Document Preservation Memorandum

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - 42CG01!.DOC


I've gotten this joke for every school ,,,,,, I  thought the KU one was  a
lot more funny of course!

Life is all about a "Six pack and a Sun-tan!"

MC


Jeff - per Beth Apollo's message.   The bottom line is what CSC really
needs to be able to invoice Calif power customers is the 810 EDI files from
all 3 CA utitlities.  They have stopped sending 810s to us and are only
providing 867's.   If we can't get the 810s going then the information
provided in the attached spreadsheets needs to get to us in order to
invoice.   This info could come via spreadsheet, or line item within the
867.   The business impact to Enron is that we have not been able to
invoice for these customers since Dec 5 and this is a large revenue amount.

Please call me - my cell phone is 713.305.1659 if you have questions.
After 11:30 central today, I will be on vacation and my backup Maggie Brown
can be reached 713.822.3753.

Teresa

----- Forwarded by Teresa D Carroll-Childers/TMG/CSC on 12/20/01 08:09 AM
-----

                    Barbara
                    Blount               To:     Teresa D Carroll-Childers/TMG/CSC@CSC
                    /TMG/CSC             cc:
                                         Subject:     Here it is
                    12/20/01
                    07:55 AM

(See attached file: PRICING_OPTIONS_DUAL_BILLING_UDC_DATA_REQUIREMENTS.doc)


Thought you might like reading this story since you just had a chili cookoff.

TM
---------------------- Forwarded by Teresa McOmber/NA/Enron on 11/01/2000
12:28 PM ---------------------------

Kathy Sturr
11/01/2000 08:52 AM
To: Cindy Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT , capps@austin.apc.slb.com, jpctexas@juno.com,
toriemily@msn.com, rs-2@pdq.net, divadarlene@cs.com, bkeese@apro-rto.com,
cking31402@aol.com, hmc@gateway.net, KM1942@aol.com, Amy
Mulligan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, cys10@aol.com, jsellman@wilsononline.com,
moles@qatar.net.qa, Donna A Slatten/NA/Enron@Enron, Sherry
Forbish/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Chris Greaney/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Janet
McDaniel/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ruthe Newman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jean
Adams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Debra Jasper/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Linhart/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Harry Woodson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Randy
Janzen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jamie Lynn/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Benningfield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Sturr/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tangie
Dykes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, vestrahan@aol.com, bsturr@mail.utexas.edu,
spudsbc@aol.com, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON, Teresa McOmber/NA/Enron@ENRON,
MaryAnn Locknar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jean Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Berger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kim Perez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Leslie/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: "Texas Chili"

I have it on good authority that this is a true story; A True Texas Story:

???????????????These are notes from an inexperienced chili
taster named FRANK, who was visiting Texas from New Jersey...
"Recently I was lucky enough to be the 10,000th attendee at the State
Fair in Texas and was asked to fill in to be a judge at a chili
cook-off. ??Apparently the original Judge #3 called in sick at the
last moment, and I happened to be standing there when the call came
in. ?I was assured by the other two judges (Native Texans) that it
would be a fun event and a true taste of Texas hospitality. ?They
assured me that the chili wouldn't be all that spicy, and besides,
they told me I could have free beer during the tasting, so I
accepted. ?Here are the scorecards from the event."

???*****Chili # 1: Mike's Maniac Mobster Monster Chili
???????????????????????JUDGE ONE: A little too heavy on tomato.
Amusing kick.
???????????????JUDGE TWO: Nice, smooth tomato flavor. Very
mild.
???????????????FRANK: Holy shit, what the hell is this stuff? You
could remove dried paint from your driveway with it. Took me two
beers to put the flames out. ?Hope that's the worst one. These Texans
are crazy
???*****Chili # 2: Arthur's Afterburner Chili

???????????????JUDGE ONE: Smoky, with a hint of pork. Slight
Jalapeno tang.
???????????????JUDGE TWO: Exciting BBQ flavor, needs more peppers to
be taken seriously.
???????????????FRANK: Keep this out of reach of children!
I'm not sure what I am supposed to taste besides pain. I had to wave
off two people who wanted to give me the Heimlich maneuver. They had
to walkie-talkie in 3 extra beers when they saw the look on my face.

???*****Chili # 3: Fred's Famous Burn Down the Barn Chili

???????????????JUDGE ONE: Excellent firehouse chili! Great kick.
Needs more beans.
???????????????JUDGE TWO: A beanless chili, a bit salty,good use of
red peppers.
???????????????FRANK: Call the EPA, I've located a uranium spill.
My nose feels like I have been snorting Drano. Everyone knows the
routine by now. ?Barmaid pounded me on the back; now my backbone is
in the front part of my chest. ?I'm getting shit-faced.

??????*****Chili # 4: Bubba's Black Magic

???????????????JUDGE ONE: Black bean chili with almost no spice.
Disappointing.
???????????????JUDGE TWO: Hint of lime in the black beans. Good side
dish for fish or other mild foods, not much of a chili.
???????????????FRANK: I felt something scraping across my tongue,
but was unable to taste it. ?Sally, the bar maid, was standing
behind me with fresh refills; that 300 lb. bitch is starting to look
HOT,just like this nuclear-waste I'm eating.

?????*****Chili # 5: Linda's Lethal Lip Remover

???????????????JUDGE ONE: Meaty, strong chili. Cayenne peppers
freshly ground, adding considerable kick. Very impressive.
???????????????JUDGE TWO: Chili using shredded beef; could use more
tomato. ?Must admit the cayenne peppers make a strong statement.
???????????????FRANK: My ears are ringing, and I can no longer focus
my eyes. ?I farted and four people behind me burst into flames.
The contestant seemed offended when I told her that her chili had
given me brain damage. ?Sally saved my tongue from bleeding by
pouring beer directly on it from a pitcher. ?It really pisses me off
that the other judges asked me to stop screaming. ?Screw those
rednecks!

?????????*****Chili # 6: Vera's Very Vegetarian Variety

???????????????JUDGE ONE: Thin yet bold vegetarian variety chili.
Good balance of spice and peppers.
???????????????JUDGE TWO: The best yet. ?Aggressive use of peppers,
onions, and garlic. ?Superb. ?
???????????????FRANK: My intestines are now a straight-pipe filled
with gaseous, sulfuric flames. ?No one seems inclined to stand behind
me except that slut Sally. ?I need to wipe my ass with a snow cone!

?????????***Chili # 7: Susan's Screaming Sensation Chili

???????????????JUDGE ONE: A mediocre chili with too much reliance on
canned peppers.
???????????????JUDGE TWO: Ho Hum, tastes as if the chef literally
threw in a can of chili peppers at the last moment. I should note
that I am worried about Judge Number 3. He appears to be in a bit of
distress as he is cursing uncontrollably.
???????????????FRANK: You could put a grenade in my mouth, pull the
pin, and I wouldn't feel a damn thing. I've lost the sight in one
eye, and the world sounds like it is made of rushing water. My shirt
is covered with chili that slid unnoticed out of my mouth. My pants
are full of lava-like shit to match my damn shirt. At least during
the autopsy they'll know what killed me. ?I've decided to stop
breathing. ?It's too painful. ?Screw it! ?I'm not getting any anyway.
If I need air, I'll just suck it in through the 4-inch hole in my
stomach.

???????????????*****Chili # 8: Helen's Mount Saint Chili

???????????????JUDGE ONE: A perfect ending... this is a nice blend
chili, safe for all, not too bold but spicy enough to declare its
existence.
???????????????JUDGE TWO: This final entry is a good, balanced
chili, neither mild nor hot. ?Sorry to see that most of it was lost
when Judge Number 3 passed out, fell and pulled the chili pot on top
of himself. ?Not sure if he's going to make it. ?Poor Yank.


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000 03:04 PM -----

	Madhur Dayal
	07/17/2000 12:29 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: BuySideDirect Subscriber Agreement

Sara,

here is online (web based) convertible trading site hat I could use - kindof
like an online broker where they match up buyers and sellers.  I take it that
before we enter to any agreement with them you need to approve it all.

 I have not looked at this document yet, so please feel free to make any
comments you may have.

Madhur

---------------------- Forwarded by Madhur Dayal/HOU/ECT on 07/17/2000 01:13
PM ---------------------------

"Lisa O'Connor" <lisa@imarkets.com> on 06/29/2000 01:49:50 PM
To: "Madhur Dayal" <madhur.dayal@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: BuySideDirect Subscriber Agreement

Dear Madhur,

It was a pleasure to speak to you this afternoon.  Enclosed are the
subscriber agreements that I mentioned.  Please let me know if you have any
questions about our system or our documentation.   Thanks and I look forward
to hearing from you.

Regards,

Lisa O'Connor

Lisa Mears O'Connor, CFA
BuySide Direct LLC
a subsidiary of Intelligent Markets, Inc.
415-369-5020 Phone
415-369-5021 Fax

 - Agreement Dated April 7 2000.doc
 - Application Dated April 7 2000.doc


Your message

  To:      Tony@Digitrain.com; rlfossum@mato.com
  Cc:      DickOsgood@aol.com; doug.loon@uschamber.com
  Subject: (no subject)
  Sent:    Mon, 6 Nov 2000 09:02:21 -0500

did not reach the following recipient(s):

doug.loon@uschamber.com on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 09:10:09 -0500
    The recipient name is not recognized
 The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=USChamber;l=WDCEXC010011061409VVLM9L6N
    MSEXCH:IMS:USChamber:WDC:WDCEXC01 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient

Message-ID: <OFE8DF15DA.B671C43F-ON8625698F.004CD559@enron.com>
From: Drew.Fossum@enron.com
To: Tony@Digitrain.com, rlfossum@mato.com
Cc: DickOsgood@aol.com, doug.loon@uschamber.com
Subject: (no subject)
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 09:02:21 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C047FB.4A49824E"

I've got to get one of these digital cameras!  Dick, did you get any action
shots--like an action shot of Doug stuffing his face with walleye?   PS:
Reed, how much of the 4 feet of snow did sturgis get????  Loon--I'm in DC
tomorrow for the day, where are you?  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 11/06/2000
07:58 AM ---------------------------

DickOsgood@aol.com on 11/05/2000 04:10:39 PM

To:   dfossum@enron.com, DLoon@uschamber.com
cc:

Subject:  (no subject)

Hey Guys:

Here is a pic from S.D. hunting.

Dick
(Embedded image moved to file: pic09374.pcx)

 - pic09374.pcx


<<0071988 RESO Enron.doc>>

Dan:

First, I've attached the proposed resolution which authorizes the City
Manager to execute the Enfolio agreement.

More importantly, I need to inform you that our senior management has
reviewed the referenced contract; I have been asked to present additional
changes to the agreement for Enron's consideration and to raise questions
about certain of its terms and conditions.

Let me start from page 1, top to bottom, and proceed to the end of the
exhibits.

1.  There is the word "DRAFT" above the title of the Enfolio agreement which
should be deleted.

2.  The introductory paragraph, line 5, should not contain the words "1st of
January, 2001."  It should be left blank, until the parties have signed the
contract.  Otherwise, the City will be in breach as of the date it signs the
contract, because Article 2, section 2.1 requires the City to proffer the
to-be-approved-by-Council resolution as of 1/1/01.

3.  Article 2, Section 2.4, line 2.  The City (Customer) wants Enron
(Company) to confirm every recorded telephonic Transaction, as defined.
Therefore, the City requests the word "may" should be changed to "shall."

4.  Article 3, Sections 3.1 and 3.2, first sentence:   Buyer's Requested
Quantity refers to the DCQ or MaxDQ.  Seller's failure to Schedule the
Buyer's Requested Quantity shall constitute a Seller's Deficiency Default.
How does a Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity fit into a Seller's
Deficiency Default if the Buyer's Requested Quantity does not include a
Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity?  What is the reason for the omission?

5.  Article 4, Section 4.1, lines 15 and 23:  Line 23 refers to "reasonable
attorneys' fees" yet line 15 refers to "attorneys' fees."  To be internally
consistent, line 15 should say "reasonable attorneys' fees."

6.  Section 4.1, right hand column, lines 3-4.  A statement showing the
determination of the Termination Payment will be prepared.  It's unclear
whether the City is entitled to review and challenge the determination
before a dispute is referred to arbitration.  The City should be entitled to
receive a copy of the determination and to question it before it is
obligated to pay the Termination Payment.  Please clarify, or permit the
City to exercise these rights.

7.  Section 4.2(iv) specifies that a Triggering Event will exist if a
bankruptcy petition is undismissed within 30 days.  Is this (under
bankruptcy laws) the minimum period of time within which one may seek
dismissal of a bankruptcy petition?  Please refer to the 11 USC section that
backs up this provision, or change to 60 days.

8.  Section 4.2(v) and (vi):  Please change "30 days" to "5 days."  The City
is concerned with the number of days that Enron may be permitted to fail to
Schedule before a Triggering Event is triggered by Enron.

9.  Section 4.2(ix):  this language discusses a default by Enron Corp.
(ENA's parent?), but no mention is made of ENA's default in this regard?
Please explain.

10. Section 4.5, line 4:  Is "a Company" supposed to refer to "the Company"
?

11. Article 5.  The City is uncomfortable with the force majeure provision
as drafted.  It states that the parties must perform even if a FM event
(earthquake) would prevent either or both parties from performing with the
60-day period stated therein.  There is no such limitation under California
law in the absence of a contract provision to the contrary.

12.  Article 7, Section 7.2:  Could Enron translate the last sentence?  We
don't understand it.

13.  Appendix "1":  Act:  Please explain why Section 3 is referred to?

14.  Appendix "1", Claims, line 4:  Please add "reasonable" before
"attorneys' fees.

 15.  Appendix "1", GAAP:  This should read: "GAAP means generally accepted
accounting principles, consistently applied, with respect to Company, and
governmental generally accepted accounting principles, consistently applied,
with respect to Customer."

16.  Appendix "1", Interest Rate:  Please delete "two percent over".  The
City has a AAA bond rating, therefore, the  City believes the 2% over prime
should not apply to it.

17.  Appendix "1", Material Adverse Change:  What does Enron believe the
City's Net Worth to be?  The $400 million threshold is mentioned.  Also,
what is ENA's bond rating?  Is "BBB-" an investment grade rating?

18.  Representations and Warranties:  Because we have agreed that the
opinion of counsel will not be required, the reps and warranties are being
deleted.  But the "Representations and Warranties" is nevertheless included
in the agreement.  Item (i) should be deleted, because the City has not
undertaken a court search as is our custom and practice whenever we issue an
opinion.  We would like to delete "and (vii) it is not ... Party."

19.  Operational Flow Orders, line 8:  Please add "reasonable" before
"attorneys' fees."

20.  Financial Matters, line 8:  What is meant by "to the extent it has a
legal right of access thereto and/or ...etc."

21.  Arbitration, Disputes to be Arbitrated.  We do not as a matter of legal
policy agree to arbitration, but we will mediate disputes.  Is Enron
amenable to mediation?  This process is less formal and less costly in my
opinion.

22.  Authority for Transactions.  Staff would like the Agreement to include
a list of employees for Company and Customer who are authorized to trade on
behalf of their employers.  Could a statement be added to this section to
this effect?  Then, we could attach the list(s) as an Exhibit C.

Thank you so much for considering these issues.  There are others which I
hope to receive from staff next week and which I will forward to you for
response.

Look forward to hearing from you soon.  I will be out of town after today
until Wednesday, March 7.

Sincerely,

Grant Kolling
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:16 AM
  To: grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us
  Cc: Kim.Ward@enron.com
  Subject: Re:  Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale
Agreement

   << File: 2001-002ctr.doc >>
  (See attached file: 2001-002ctr.doc)

  Grant,
       I have incorporated the language you provided to me in
the attached
  document.  I have been informed by the Corporate Secretary's
office that
  they will issue a Certificate of Incumbency showing that the
person
  executing the contract for ENA is authorized to execute
contracts for ENA.
  No other party signs as to form or terms, however, the
officer executing
  for ENA will require that the deal person and I initial on
the line next to
  his signature.  I have reviewed the proposed draft
resolution.  ENA will
  accept the enacted resolution and will not require that the
City Attorney
  issue an opinion.  If the attached contract is acceptable,
please print off
  2 originals, have them approved, signed and forward to me
for ENA's
  approval and signature.  Once the contract is fully
executed, I will return
  one fully executed original to you for the City's file.

 - 0071988 RESO Enron.doc


FYI, headline tells it all.  Further delay in Polish power market opening.
Though there is light at the end of the tunnel, it is now about 3 months
further out than my last e-mail to you on this subject.  let me know if you
need more.   thanks  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 12/12/2000
11:25 ---------------------------

Philip Davies
12/12/2000 11:14
To: Poland
cc:

Subject: Poland: Polish Grid Operator Sees 6-Month Delay To Balancing Mkt

Confirmation of our understanding.
---------------------- Forwarded by Philip Davies/LON/ECT on 12/12/2000 11:17
---------------------------

djcustomclips@djinteractive.com on 12/12/2000 11:04:09
Please respond to nobody@mail1.djnr.com
To: 140569@mailman.enron.com
cc:

Subject: Poland: Polish Grid Operator Sees 6-Month Delay To Balancing Mkt

Polish Grid Operator Sees 6-Month Delay To Balancing Mkt

12/12/2000
Dow Jones International News
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  WARSAW -(Dow Jones)- An hourly balancing market in Poland's electricity
sector - the key to an open market - won't come into operation until
July 1, 2001, six months later than originally scheduled, grid operator
officials told Dow Jones Newswires Tuesday.

  "Tests are still going on in the introduction of (information
technology) software for all entities involved in the balancing market.
We expect a test period of six months as of Jan. 1 and for the system to
'go live' in July 2001," said Marek Zerka, deputy president of Polish
grid operator Polskie Sieci Elektroenergetyczne.
  Industry insiders say an hourly balancing market is essential for the
effective functioning of a liberalized electricity market in Poland.

  "Without an hourly balancing market, trade in the whole sector won't
function properly," Wladyslaw Mielczarski of Energoprojekt-Consulting SA
told the EuroForum conference in Warsaw recently.

  The chief benefit of the hourly balancing market is that it would push
both generators and distributors to develop more sophisticated
purchasing and risk management strategies, which in turn would increase
trading volumes on the Polish Power Exchange, or Polpx, analysts said.

  The introduction of a fully functioning hourly balancing market would
end PSE's current practice of setting monthly prices for balancing
market electricity on the basis of estimated demand for the following
month.

  Analysts say this is a cumbersome and inaccurate procedure, in which
physical supply of electricity and the financial settlement of accounts
only roughly correlates.

  PSE and a group of companies, including Polpx and the power plants
Elektrownia Dolna Odra and Elektrownia Patnow-Adamow-Konin, started
testing computer systems for the balancing market Oct. 1, and tests are
ongoing, Zerka said. Officials at Elektrownia Dolna Odra said the power
plant was technically fully prepared for the Jan. 1 start.

  However, Zerka said there were some technical teething problems with
Polpx's software, and uncertainties related to the compatibility of
software used by different entities.

  Zerka said the hourly balancing market will be based on the
"pay-as-bid" system used in the U.K. This means that participants will
need a risk management and trading strategy in place, and can't continue
basing their sales or purchases on marginal costs, said analysts.

  Until the balancing market starts operating in July, PSE will continue
to draw up monthly coordination plans. Many analysts say the low volumes
the power exchange has had since its inception in July are largely
caused by problems of inaccuracies in the monthly settlement of physical
flows.

  Polpx recently said it needs at least 4% of total domestic turnover to
break even, and up to 7% before it can start thinking about introducing
forwards and derivatives markets in the Polish electricity sector.

  It has around 1% of total turnover today, and the delay in setting up
the balancing market means that bigger volumes won't come about until
the second half of 2001, insiders said.

  -By Joe Harper, Dow Jones Newswires; 48-22 622-2766;
joe.harper@dowjones.com

Folder Name: Poland
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 90

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Jeff,

That is good news about Leander.

Now for the stage.  I would like to get it sold by the end of March.   I have
about $225K invested in the stagecoach,
 it looks like I need to get around $745K to breakeven.

I don't need the cash out right now so if I could get a personal guarantee
and Jaques Craig can
work out the partnership transfer, I would definitely be willing to carry a
second lien.  I understand second liens are going for 10%-12%.
Checkout this spreadsheet.

These numbers should get the place sold in the next fifteen minutes.
However,  I am very concerned about the way it is being shown.  Having Lucy
show it is not a good idea.  I need you to meet the buyers and take some
trips over to get more familar with the property.  My dad doesn't have the
time and I don't trust
Lucy or Wade to show it correctly.  I would prefer for you to show it from
now on.

I will have the operating statements complete through December by this
Friday.

Phillip


Kendal:
Thanks.  I have forwarded this on to our credit person.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	"Bowman, Kendal" <kendal.bowman@pgnmail.com>
	05/24/2001 01:47 PM

		 To: "'Carol.St.Clair@enron.com'" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Status

Affiliate list for CP&L:(These are to be excluded from being considered an
affiliate for purposes of the EEI)
NCNG - North Carolina Natural Gas Company
FPC - Florida Power Corporation
Monroe Power Company
Richmond County Power, LLC
Rowan County Power, LLC
Desoto County Generating Company
Progress Power Marketing Inc.
Eastern Carolina Natural Gas Company, LLC
Electric Fuels Corporation
Progress Telecommunications Corporation

Kendal Bowman
Associate General Counsel
Progress Energy
P.O. Box 1551
Raleigh, NC  27602
(919)546-6794
kendal.bowman@pgnmail.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 1:18 PM
To: kendal.bowman@pgnmail.com
Subject: Status

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2001 12:16 PM -----

                    Carol St

                    Clair                To:     Kendall.Bowman@pgnmail.com

                                         cc:

                    05/22/2001           Subject:     Status

                    12:06 PM

Kendal:
I am still waiting to hear back from  my credit folks on the open credit
issues.  Any update from you?  Can you send to me your affiliate list?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Sign Up for Kase and Company's Derivatives Boot Camp
Two Full Days, November 5-6, 2001
 Marriott West Loop, Houston, TX

 Energy Consumers and Producers
Are you a consumer that failed to buy forward last year and bought too soon this year? Are you a producer who hedged too early last year and are unhedged now? Are you comforting yourself with the fact that you did not hedge to make money? Let's face it - you did not hedge to lose money either. Kase's Derivatives Boot Camp will provide you with the indispensable strategies and tactics you need to avoid costly errors and equip you to make the important hedging decisions necessary for survival in today's treacherous marketplace.
Kase's Derivatives Boot Camp Covers:    The Derivatives Market  Buying and Selling Forward  Hedging Long and Short Positions  Trigger Deals, EFP's, Swaps  Hedging Spreads and Basis  Volatility and Options  Hedging with Options  Hedging with "Exotics"  Market Behavior in Favorable Price Environments  Market Behavior in Adverse Price Environments  Developing a Strategy to Match Risk Appetite  Selecting Appropriate Instruments  Developing Policies and Procedures            	 Regular: $995.00 Two or More: $895.00   Click Here for More Information  About the Presenters  Who Should Attend  Detailed Agenda  Other Classes Offered By Kase   ***Register Now! ***   [IMAGE] Kase and Company also offers In House Training Classes. For more information about Kase In House Training Classes please email us at kase@kaseco.com  or call at (505) 237-1600.


I did...trying to get him in next week so that Vasant can see him as well.

thanks

Vince J Kaminski
24/01/2001 22:24
To: Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: A quant

Bryan,

Did you have a chance to take a look at the resume I sent you?
He looked like a great guy for your group.

Vince


Once more

---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 01/22/2001 03:04 PM
---------------------------

Rob G Gay
01/22/2001 03:26 PM
To: Blanca Bollom/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Lender Presentation

Can you print 10 color copies? Thanks


The $33.82 rate I was qouted was after tax.  I specifically asked this
question on the phone and at the airport.  Not a good way to do business.
PL


457 deals
13 New, 444 existing

Shari Mao
06/06/2000 12:04 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: May Activity Survey

Daren,
Please provide the number of Producer Services deals for the month of May
(New vs. Existing)
Shari
3-3859
---------------------- Forwarded by Shari Mao/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2000 01:02 PM
---------------------------

James Scribner@ENRON
05/30/2000 11:43 AM
To: Bob Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Cheryl Dudley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Faye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gordon Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy
Barnes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Irene Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect,
Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Houston/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michael
Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Mao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Reside/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elmo Gore/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: May Activity Survey

Attached please find the Activity Survey for the month of May, 2000.

I am sending the survey out this time as an opportunity to introduce myself
to those of you I have not yet met.  I am being asked to take a direct roll
in the further development and rollout of the Operations Pricing Model (fka
Transaction Cost Model).  In the past, I have directed the implementation of
several pricing systems based on activity based costing similar to the
Operations Pricing Model (OPM).  Over the past couple of weeks my
observations of the Model have lead me to be concerned with the quality of
data used in the model.  It will take efforts by both you and the OPM team to
get to a satisfactory level of data quality.  This process can start with
this months data collection efforts.  Please pay particular attention this
month as the "bar is being raised" by the management of Energy Operations for
data quality and timeliness.

The attached survey drives your costs from your activities to the commercial
teams.  Please select your RCs, and fill in the driver quantity for the
requested driver for the month of May. Please fill out the attached activity
driver survey with May numbers for your RC and return to Shari Mao by end of
day Friday, June 2.

Please note the following updates:
For Nat Gas, Sally Beck is interested in physical (as denoted as PH in the
survey) vs. financial (as denoted as FI in the survey) numbers, please
provide statistics accordingly
If a driver has not been updated per your request, please call or email
Jennifer Reside
If you have additional updates / suggestions or items that need correction,
please call or email Jennifer Reside

If your group currently generates a standard report that captures the
surveyed data, please send the report to Jennifer Reside.  This will
eliminate your need to fill out this survey every month.  If you would like
us to collect this information from someone within your team beginning next
month, please let Jennifer know.

Please contact Jennifer Reside x3-5971 with questions (Shari is on vacation
this week), or if you are unable to complete the survey within the allotted
time.


When entering a supplemental deal to sell or buy energy for a service
customer with a profit sharing arrangement, we need to enter that service
customer as the counterparty in CAPS, and then when the customer is the
counterparty in CAPS, the price MUST be zero(or subtract transmission and/or
scheduling fee) in Enpower.  If we buy the energy outright from our service
customer (such as with CRC), then we enter ECTRT as the counterparty in CAPS,
and input the appropriate price to pay the service customer in Enpower.  If
we enter the service customer as the counterparty in CAPS and also enter a
price greater than zero in Enpower to buy from that customer, we do NOT
receive the revenue from California AND we pay the customer the fixed price.
Everyone needs to understand this.  IF you have any questions, please ask me,
or a senior member of the group.

If you have other questions concerning physical or financial aspects of RT
please ask me or bring them to the meeting.

Bill


We are currently experiencing performance problems with the Performance
Management website.  This is due to the number of concurrent users accessing
the application.  Technology is working on a solution to the problems and
will keep you posted as the problems are remedied.

Thank you for your patience.


Hello-
Diana Scholtes  11/08
Enron Sells Idaho
99.50
Mid C

We have term 11/10-11/11/2000

Bloomberg has term 11/13-11/30-2000

please let me know
thanks


The report named:
<http://trv.dev.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=8&report_name
=FT+-+Texas+P/L&category_cd=4&category_name=TEXAS&toc_hide=1&sTV1=4&TV1E
xp=Y&current_efct_date=06/04/2001> FT - Texas P/L, published as of
06/04/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Shari Mao
03/31/2000 11:44 AM
To: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane H Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E
Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita
Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scotty Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Jacobsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect,
Jeff Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Cheryl D King/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Judy Barnes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Irene Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denae Umbower/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juanita
Marchand/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim
S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: March Surveys

Hello,

We have prepared January and February data and will be scheduling meetings
with you in the next few weeks.  For the month of March, please provide a
completed "Hours" survey for each position within your group.  This survey
will collect the  time your team spent on performing their activities in the
month of March.

NOTE: We are now collecting EOL related activities.  If you spend time
directly supporting EOL, and your survey does not have an activity that you
can assign these times to, please contact me as soon as possible so we can
add the appropriate activities to your survey.

To fill out the survey:

At the top of the spreadsheet, you will see a box labelled "Select Your RC".
Click on the box and input your RC number, which will need to be 4 digits.
Once you have done this, another box will appear with the message "Select
Position from Drop Box!" You can then select the position (i.e., staff,
specialist, etc.) and "OK". The choices for positions are based on
information contained in the Org Database (i.e., if a position is not listed
that should be, please call me to discuss as it would indicate that
corrections need to be made to the database).  Once you have the list of
activities, please input hours (for the entire month) for each activity
listed in the column labelled "Hours".
If you're filling out the survey for your team, save a file for each of the
positions you fill out for your team prior to filling out the next position.
If you do not, the information will be lost.

We have included February compiled hours per position (if you had two
specialists performing the same activity - 20 hours each, the "Last Month"
column would show a total of 40 hrs for that month).  As with last month, you
have the option to complete the survey on behalf of your entire group or send
this survey to each of your team members, allowing each individual to fill
out the time they spent on each activity.  If there are any activities you
perform not included in your survey, please contact me as soon as possible
for a copy of the Activity Dictionary.

Please return these surveys by end of day Wednesday, April 5th.  If this is a
problem, please notify me or Lisa Cousino immediately.

Thanks,
Shari
3-3859


Mark the position is relatively straight forward. Enron Australia Finance
Pty.Ltd.(EAF) trades Australian Power Derivatives under what is known as an
exempt market declaration (safe harbour provision). There are a number of
requirements to be met under this Declaration including a list
"qualifications" of the persons who can enter into a transaction. The only
qualification likely to apply to a non- Australian resident is if  a party
registered under the Declaration (such as EAF) reasonably believes  that the
entity has tangible assets with a market value of at least AUD10M (USD6M).

What happens if we contract with someone who does not have this asset level
and none of the other tests apply? In all likelihood nothing. However, the
Australian Regulator (ASIC) would expect EAF to have procedures in place
aimed at compliance with the provisions of the Declaration. We are required
to report annually on these procedures. We are also currently in discussions
with ASIC aimed at extending our Declaration to all products traded through
EOL in Australia. This is to ensure we are prepared should legislative
changes eventuate next year requiring trading in all derivatives to be
licenced. Any suggestion that we do not have procedures in place to ensure
compliance with the intent of our current declaration would be of extreme
concern to ASIC. They placed particular emphasis on our assurances that we
are not going to be entering the "retail" market and will have procedures to
ensure this occurs.

In essence what am saying is that we need to be able to point to procedures
to show we are taking reasonable steps to ensure that our counterparties meet
the qualifications to trade power derivatives.  My concern is not with
Australian companies - there are a number of tests that apply to them apart
from just asset level.  Also we can handle them from here.But when a company
appears on Tana's list that is say incorporated in the US and does not trade
in Australia there seems no way of checking unless some assessment is  made
of its asset level. I thought this was being done as per procedures developed
(see procedures attached to following email).

Rather than bounce emails between us can we arrange a brief phone discussion
on this point?

From: Mark Taylor@ECT on 18-08-2000 11:25 CDT
To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: EnronOnline access to Australian Power products

Thanks for dealing with Tana on these issues.  It is not entirely clear to me
what you want the policy to be regarding which counterparties have access to
Australian power products.  You probably already know that the EnronOnline
people want every counterparty everywhere in the world to have access to
every product unless Credit or Legal can justify restricting their access.
Credit already performs a financial test on each counterparty to determine if
they meet the CFTC Eligible Swap Participant requirements.  Unfortunately,
that test is not as restrictive as the Australian tangible assets test.  It
sounds like there should be a US$6 million tangible assets test applied by
Credit before we give any counterparty access to Australian Power (this would
be a total pain but certainly possible).  On the other hand, if you feel
comfortable giving access to non-Australian counterparties  without that test
being performed, we can do that, too.  Pleas let me know if we should ask
Credit to start performing this test on all counterparties or if it should be
limited to Australian entities.


Enjoy a well-deserved afternoon off.  I appreciate your notes when you are
out on who to contact.  Have a great weekend.  --Sally

Jeffrey C Gossett
02/02/2001 11:09 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Afternoon - 2/2/01

If you need anything this afternoon,  please call Kam (x35781) or I will be
checking my messages.

Thanks


Here is the latest Calpine model.
Ben


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:06:49 -0600
From: "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
To: "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>
Cc: "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject: Calif. regulators postpone key ruling on power spending
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline

Thursday March 15, 4:48 pm Eastern Time

Calif. regulators postpone key ruling on power spending

SAN FRANCISCO, March 15 (Reuters) - California regulators postponed a
decision on Thursday on how much money the state will tap from monthly
utility bills to finance badly needed long-term power purchases -- projected
at $43 billion.

The state Public Utilities Commission (PUC) postponed the issue to its March
27 meeting.

An estimated $10 billion state bond issue to help finance the power purchases
is a key part of the rescue plan.

State Treasurer Philip Angelides hopes to close the initial bond issuance by
the end of May but needs the PUC to decide how much electricity bill revenues
will go to the state.

Long-term deals to buy cheaper power from independent energy companies are a
key part of California's emergency rescue plan to stabilize its chaotic power
market and keep its two big investor-owned utilities from bankruptcy.

To help pay for that power, the PUC, which sets gas and electric rates, must
decide an amount to take from the bills paid to PG&E Corp.'s (NYSE:PCG -
news) Pacific Gas and Electric unit and Edison International's (NYSE:EIX -
news) Southern California Edison subsidiary.

The two companies supply electricity to about 24 million Californians.

The money is to go to the state's Department of Water Resources, the agency
charged by Gov. Gray Davis with negotiating and signing contracts to buy
power at locked-in prices well below the prices paid in the volatile
wholesale spot market.

PG&E and SoCal Edison want all of their generating costs covered before any
dollars are tapped for state purchases.

So far, Davis has announced 40 separate agreements and contracts with 20
energy companies which add up to $43 billion in supplies to be delivered over
a few months to 10 years. The supplies total almost 9,000 megawatts -- enough
electricity for about 9 million homes.

Under California's flawed scheme to deregulate its power industry, PG&E and
SoCal Edison were forced to buy power in the costly spot market but were
barred from collecting that price from customers because of a rate freeze
that runs to March 31, 2002.


FYI, here are some informational items that were released over the weekend about the MISO startup related to transmission service and OASIS practices...

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


Attached is the document with one change.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fuller, Dave
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 2:56 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Cc:	Nemec, Gerald; Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	EPNG Proposal II

All,

Here is a draft document for BP, please review and comment.

Dave

 << File: EPNG Capacity Proposal II.doc >>


pls give that copy of Gorak's sba filing to maria.  I think I left it with
you and Mary.  df


I think the D is very fast, but having said that, I still think we are a
half-step slower than OU (OU has one of the fastest D's I have ever seen
including the Miami hay-days).  My understanding is Mack held back much of
the playbook in order to run the ball.  DD Lewis still overpursues.   We
may be vulnerable up the middle.  You're right about the punting, OU
specializes in blocking punts and/or returning them.  I am glad Mack forced
the running game, we will need this part of the game to stand a chance
against OU.  Benson was the bright spot - great acceleration through the
hole, an uncanny ability to make people miss and the ability to change
speeds while looking for the next hole to dart through.   He reminds me
most of Marcus Allen.  Allen never looked fast but was always accelerating
past tacklers and waiting for the next block to be set up.

I know I shouldn't jinx this team, but I am very optimistic.  We will need
Benson's running to actually make this a special season.   Simm's is not
good enough to carry the team through the air only.   OU will have their
DBs and backers facing him while he is in the pocket.   It appears he still
locks on to the primary receiver.  I'm telling you now - a good running
game will cure all our ills.

Let me know what you think.  Let's try to go to lunch this week.  I am free
any day.

GC

---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Carrow/VALIC on 09/04/2001 11:00
AM ---------------------------

"Giron, Darron C." <Darron.C.Giron@ENRON.com> on 09/04/2001 10:55:46 AM

To:   "Greg Carrow (E-mail)" <greg_carrow@valic.com>
cc:

Subject:  MNSU

Did you watch the game?  What did you think?  The OL was either rusty,
or just plain average.  The D looked fast, but still prone to
overpursuit.  We will have at least one punt blocked this year.  I'm
still not sure the best game QB is starting.  MB is a hell of a
recruiter,  you can tell (especially on D) how fast the team is.

DG

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Susan:
Please coordinate this.  Thanks.
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2000 05:58 PM -----

	"Robert J. Rieth" <rjr@houston.rr.com>
	06/11/2000 08:00 PM

		 To: "Carol St Clair" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ISDA Master

Carol  - If Enron Corp. could date the guaranty the same day as the
Agreement - June 8, 2000 - I think that would work best.

Rob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Carol St Clair" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
To: <rjr@houston.rr.com>
Cc: "Susan Flynn" <Susan.Flynn@enron.com>
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 2:16 PM
Subject: ISDA Master

>
>
> Rob:
> I received the documents and Susan Flynn will get them executed along with
the
> Enron Guaranty and the other certificates and get them back to you next
week.
> My question for you is when you consider the agreement to be effective for
> trading purposes?  I'm assuming you want to wait for the Enron Guaranty
and that
> any trades done before the Guaranty is sent to you would not be confirmed
under
> the Master.  Please let me know your thoughts on this.  I have asked
Enron's
> counsel to process the Guaranty ASAP.  Thanks.
> Carol
>
>


Briggs!!

FYI - I am off on vacation from the 1st to the 15th of September and then come back to a major
storm of work in Berlin in the run up to the Energy Act revision.

Could we perhaps talk tomorrow to see where we stand on various pending items with Eon:

1. KY issues and whether we have a chance to intervene in the rate case.
2. VA intervention
3. Pol Action program being put together by Russ Kean
4. Reg Action program being put together by you and Robin N.
5. USTR - scope for "the squeeze" there and getting Zelig's staff engaged on this one.
6. Follow up (if any) with FERC
7. My next visit to the US - which will probably be early October (and what I should do)

It would be good to get Thompson on the line with us to discuss this

Also, what about costs (your time, Russ', and Akin Gumps) I would like
to free ride as much as possible.

When are you coming back to visit??
Take care

Hennemeyer


I got the package on the 2002 PBS special.  We are already doing a
significant PBS sponsorship in connection with a series based on Dan Yergin's
(author of The Prize) new book "The Commanding Heights".  We have looked at
numerous Public Broadcasting sponsorships in the past, but the ratings are so
low they tend to be a very inefficient means of reaching our target
audience.  We made an exception for yergin's series because it focusses on
the role of free markets and their relationship with governments over time.
I'll ask Margaret Allen to handle the decline.


John , seems that the Wartsila guys have not been straight with us , your
guys didn't cause the problem .
Thanks
michael

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Lewis, Richard
Sent: Wednesday 23 May 2001 08:42
To: Brown, Michael
Subject: Wartsila USA

Our US team are not to blame.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Lewis/LON/ECT on 23/05/2001 08:45
---------------------------

Chris Thrall
22/05/2001 19:10
To: Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Rob Bayley/LON/ECT, Peter Crilly/LON/ECT@ECT, Nigel Beresford/EU/Enron

Subject: Wartsila USA

Richard,

This is the e-mail you forwarded back in February.  I have chased up all of
the guys in the US and here's the scoop:

ENA
Spoke with Bob Virgo who is a John Chappell equivalent, working for Dave Duran
They looked hard at the Wartsila engines back in March and concluded that it
would not work due to emissions problems - they were considering the sites
from all over the US
They haven't spoken with Wartsila for over a month
No wonder why Dave Duran hasn't rushed to call me back

EES
Spoke with Jeff Golden who is VP Corporate Development and acting as deal
leader for distributed generation projects
They have spoken with Wartsila only generally about a deal
EES is trying to create optionality for its originators by pre-permitting
some sites in New Mexico (x 2), Arizona (x 2) and Nevada (x 5)
Each site would be suited for 10 - 50 MW... therefore 70 - 350 MW total
They looked at a 2-4 year lease option with Wartsila starting this summer but
it likely won't happen - can't get the sites permitted in time
Jeff didn't think there was anything that would cause Wartsila to conclude
that the US deal was immenent
Jeff was interested in co-ordinating our efforts and wants to discuss the
merits of a global deal - I will be sending him a copy of our Wartsila term
sheet

Spoke with Mark Dobler who is VP Operations
confirmed that Jeff is the man to talk to in EES
sentiment in EES is that they are no big time bullish about getting into
physical positions to cover off California - thinks the Sol Cal Edison credit
problem will be solved by the government
heard that one of the EES guys in Brazil (Tony Spruill) is looking at
generation to cover off some positions - another potential for a global deal

Conclusion
From Enron USA's perspective there is no burning deal for Wartsila kit

Interesting feedback considering this morning's conversation...

Regards,

Chris

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Thrall/LON/ECT on 22/05/2001 17:22
---------------------------

Richard Lewis
12/02/2001 08:00
To: Mark Dobler/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Dan Leff@EES, Rob Bayley/LON/ECT@ECT, Chris Thrall/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Mobile DG Sets

We are in negotiations with Wartsila, a maker of 3MW gas recip engines, that
gives us access to up to 700MW of engines over a 5 year time frame (including
some very nice optionality).  An important feature is that we think we can
mark to market the tolling contracts.

Chris Thrall is the lead originator on the deal, which still has some
significant hurdles to overcome.  My intention is to get this deal done, then
bring North America in to the equation.
Wartsila are a counterparty with great potential, but can be flakey, and
therefore need to be handled carefully.  I will ask Chris to give you a call
later today.

Regards

Richard

	Enron Energy Services  From:  Mark Dobler @ EES
09/02/2001 23:11

To: Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Dan Leff

Subject: Mobile DG Sets

Richard -

I was referred to you by Dan Leff, who asked me to touch base on some mobile
power sets you are deploying in the UK.  He indicated the number to be qty 70
10MW units.

I have the same task here in the US, specifically to take advantage of the
power shortage occurring 2-3Q 2001, in multiple markets.

If you are the right contact person, can we talk on 12 Feb?  I can be reached
at 713.345.5296 (office) or 713.302.3663 (cell).  If you are not the right
contact person, can you forward accordingly?  Thanks for your help.

Regards
Mark


[IMAGE] 	Search  Delayed Quote RT Quote Charting Earnings Ratings Competition Key Ratios Financials Insiders
	 TOOLS  [IMAGE] MAPS  [IMAGE] STOCKS  [IMAGE] FUNDS  [IMAGE] PERSONALFINANCE  [IMAGE] ECONOMY& BONDS

[IMAGE]	     At the End of the Day Today's Market      DJIA 9907.26 DOWN -12.74 Nasdaq 1911.25 DOWN -22.78 S?500 1122.20 DOWN -8.00 Rus 2000 480.04 DOWN -3.06 10 Yr Bd 4.98 DOWN -.06 DJTA 2759.33 DOWN -38.50 FTSE 100 5189.70 UP 24.90 H. Seng 10691.30 DOWN -34.00 Nik. 225 9791.40 DOWN -206.40 DAX 5097.06 DOWN -10.55   This Week's Sectors   Health Care 0.53 %  Financial -3.68 %  Technology -0.92 %  Consumer Cyclicals 1.49 %  Communication -2.24 %  Consumer Staples 1.36 %  Capital Goods -2.32 %  Energy 1.06 %  Basic Materials 1.12 %  Utilities -1.9 %  Transport 0.17 %  (Mouse over for detail, click to launch Weekly Map of the Market) February 1, 2002  Top Stories [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Pundit Watch A January Freeze  By Rebecca Thomas Stocks sank last month. Some of our most bearish pundits think that will continue the rest of the year.  Updated Predictions  [IMAGE] The Economy The Devil Is in the Details[IMAGE]  By Rebecca Thomas Friday's unemployment report isn't nearly as positive as it might seem. [IMAGE] Say What? Touchdown!  By Monica Rivituso Analyst John Shanley at team Wells Fargo called the right play on Reebok.  More Articles    Advertisement [IMAGE]  BIG EVENT In YOUR Living Room! Featuring LIFE sized action in EPIC proportions. The closest thing to actually being there!  ENTER HERE  TO WIN:50" HDTV PLASMA FLAT SCREEN TELEVISION - $15,999 USD value!  --  Lightweight, Ultra-Thin Design --  160o Wide Viewing Angle --  16.77 Million Colors or XEROX PHASER(R) 860 NETWORK COLOR PRINTER  Mutual Fund News [IMAGE] Fund FAQs Behind a Fund's Velvet Rope  By Dawn Smith When a mutual fund closes itself to new money, is it a good thing or a bad thing?   More Articles    Personal Finance Features [IMAGE] SmartMoney Life Livin' Le Dolce Vino  By James B. Stewart France may soon surrender to Italy its monopoly on premium, investment-grade vintages.  More Articles    Insurance Center  The one place where you can get multiple insurance quotes and apply directly for a loan.  Your source for the best quotes on auto, health and disability, home owners and life insurance, and annuities. http://www.smartmoney.com/marketplace/index.cfm?story=insurance   SmartMoney MagazineStart-Off The New Year With A Great Little Investment That Could Pay Off Big!  For a limited time you can subscribe to SmartMoney Magazine at a new lower price and receive SmartMoney's Preferred Subscriber Advantages. Don't miss this opportunity to make a small investment in the magazine whose top stock picks in the previous decade exceeded the S&P by remarkable margins.* And this special offer entitles you to higher new savings: $48 or 69% off the newsstand rate! Plus, all the advantages of being a Preferred Subscriber. But it won't last long, click now for details . * As of Aug 2001.             [IMAGE]  If you have any questions or problems, please email us at: helplist@smartmoneylist.com               You have received this email because you have opted-in to receive information from SmartMoney.com. To unsubscribe from this mailing please follow this link . To change your preferences, visit our site at http://www.smartmoney.com/mailinglist .  If you're having difficulties viewing this newsletter, you should change your preferences to "Text" at the above URL.                  	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	   [IMAGE] Do you carry MasterCard
?  Save $5 on annual subscriptions to SmartMoney Select when you use your MasterCard
! This offer is for a limited time only - click here to learn more .      [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] What Went Wrong With Enron?  And what lessons should investors learn from the fiasco?  A SmartMoney.com Special Report .  Access exclusive documents and read our first-rate coverage.    [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	  Smartmoney.com Week On The Street SmartMoney.com ?2002 SmartMoney. SmartMoney is a joint publishing venture of Dow Jones & Company, Inc. and Hearst Communications, Inc.  	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]


Jeff,

Greg is requesting Enron Industrial Markets' 2001 Goals & Objectives (no more
than 3 to 4 each) asap.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor


Bob/Kay:

Thanks for your help last week with these ComEd LOI's.

Janet signed the documents Friday afternoon and we faxed a copy of each to
ComEd.  ComEd will use the electronic versions below to generate executable
copies on their letterhead and send them back to me.  I will bring them up
for initialling once I recieve them.

Fred

Bob Carter
07/21/2000 05:35 PM
To: Carter.C.Culver@ucm.com
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Com Ed LOIs

Fred Mitro asked that I send the electronic versions of these two documents.