-----Original Message-----
From: Lipke, Craig [mailto:CWLipke@czn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:52 AM
To: Theresa Staab (E-mail); Paul Lucci (E-mail)
Cc: Sean Breen (E-mail); John Cogan (E-mail)
Subject: FW: ----EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY----

FYI...   -Craig

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Briggs, David [ <mailto:David.Briggs@XCELENERGY.COM>]
Sent:   Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:45 AM
To:     dl Gas Wholesale Mkt and Sales; Dallinger, Curtis; Hagerman, Mark F; Aggie Fernandez (E-mail); Al Cervanyk (E-mail); Amy Jangula (E-mail); Andrew Gurule (E-mail); Angela Brown (E-mail); Angela C. Nguyen (E-mail); Anita Beilhart (E-mail); Ann Bose (E-mail); Annette Willis (E-mail); Anthony Cianflone (E-mail); Anton Langland (E-mail); Barton J Leven (E-mail); Becky Wells (E-mail); Benjamin Scott Green (E-mail); Beth Bingham (E-mail); Bill Clark (E-mail); Bill Haffner (E-mail); Bill Vernon (E-mail); Bill Warburton (E-mail); Bob Nelson (E-mail); Bob Smith (E-mail); Brad Mantz (E-mail); Brandon Dyer (E-mail); Brenda Cather (E-mail); Brenda Mayland (E-mail); Bruce Bomholt (E-mail); Bryan Streelman (E-mail); C. Carley (E-mail); Cathy Danforth (E-mail); Chail (E-mail); Chase Whittaker (E-mail); Cheryl Brooks (E-mail); Chris Denison (E-mail); Chris H. Pade (E-mail); Chris Hoffman (E-mail); Chuck Cook (E-mail 2); Chuck Cook (E-mail 3); Chuck Cook (E-mail); Connie Simmons (E-mail); Craig W. Lipke (E-mail); Ctotzke (E-mail); Dale Carlson (E-mail); Dan Garber (E-mail); Darrel Winer (E-mail); Dave Moody (E-mail); David A. Kuhn (E-mail); David Briggs (E-mail); David Carroll (E-mail); Dean Blanken (E-mail); Deanna Sharpe (E-mail); Debbie Peters (E-mail); Debbie S (E-mail); Dick Coil (E-mail); Dick Monson (E-mail); Don Knudson (E-mail); Don MacDonald (E-mail); Donna Pisani (E-mail); Doris Ring (E-mail); Drew (E-mail); Ed Degan (E-mail); Ed Mahardy (E-mail); Elaine McCarthy (E-mail); Erika Vanderpuil (E-mail); Erine Pitts (E-mail); F. Lee Robinson (E-mail); Frank Visconti (E-mail); Fred Kelly (E-mail); Gayla Wagner (E-mail); George Hoague (E-mail); Glen Nash (E-mail); Gradyn Comfort (E-mail); Greg Bachman (E-mail); Greg Hempelman (E-mail); Greg Smith (E-mail); Gwen Espree (E-mail); Heather Lacy (E-mail); Heidi Mechtenberg (E-mail); Helen Haynes (E-mail); Helena Grenardo (E-mail 2); Holly Beckman (E-mail); James Adams (E-mail); Jamie Arnold (E-mail); Jane Schopplein (E-mail); Janet Aery (E-mail); Janet Jackson (E-mail); Jason Oldham (E-mail); Jay Cleary (E-mail); Jennifer Greenwell (E-mail); Jerry Cable (E-mail); Jerry Marizza (E-mail); Jim Adams (E-mail); Jo Moak (E-mail); Joanne Warnstrom (E-mail); Joe Hanlon (E-mail); John Boughner (E-mail); John E. Schaffer (E-mail); John Emley (E-mail); John McGinni (E-mail); John Washabaugh (E-mail); Julie Burton (E-mail); Julie Long (E-mail); Kathleen Salak (E-mail 2); Kathleen Salak (E-mail); Kathryn Kobel (E-mail); Keith T. Avila (E-mail); Kelley Prentice (E-mail); Kelly Pollard (E-mail); Kelly Pollard (E-mail); Ken Buys (E-mail); Ken Witt (E-mail); Kenneth Campbell (E-mail); Kevin Maxian (E-mail); Kevin Norris (E-mail); Kimery Bagwell (E-mail); Kirt Kittleson (E-mail); Kristina Brandt (E-mail); Larry Bevans (E-mail); Larry Campbell (E-mail); Larry Freeman (E-mail); Laura Barton (E-mail); Lawrence Hoeh (E-mail); Leo Radkowski (E-mail); Linda Richards (E-mail); Linda Riggs (E-mail); Lindsay Ferguson (E-mail); Lisa Walsh (E-mail); Lorraine Edmonds (E-mail); Lorraine Fabbri (E-mail); Mar Briones (E-mail); Marilyn West (E-mail); Mark Cory (E-mail); Mark Gazette (E-mail); Mark Ibsen (E-mail); Mary Giles (E-mail); Michael P. Earnest (E-mail); Mike Beckner (E-mail); Mike Calvelage (E-mail); Mike DeCianne (E-mail); Mike Friend (E-mail); Mike Greenwood (E-mail); Mike Gregory (E-mail); Mike Grenda (E-mail); Mike Scoglio (E-mail); Milton R. DiGregorio (E-mail); Natasha Jackson (E-mail); Nona Wilczek (E-mail); Paige Briggs (E-mail); Pat Daily (E-mail); Pat Downey (E-mail); Patty Beavers (E-mail); Paul Sitchler (E-mail); Peggy Jenkins (E-mail); Phil Davis (E-mail); Rachel D. Reinert (E-mail); Randy Allen (E-mail); Randy Bumgardner (E-mail); Randy Crane (E-mail); Randy Williams (E-mail); Randy Yates (E-mail); Ray Demel (E-mail); Renato Nitura (E-mail); Richard Culshaw (E-mail); Rick Williams (E-mail); Robert L. Dinges (E-mail); Robyn Lower (E-mail); Roger Elbrader (E-mail); Rridley (E-mail); Sabrina Brown (E-mail); Samuel T. Rasure (E-mail); Scott Kominiak (E-mail); Scott Marsh (E-mail); Stacy Hower (E-mail); Steve Dixon (E-mail); Steve Hogsett (E-mail); Steve Powell (E-mail); Steve Sly (E-mail); Steven R. Hultin (E-mail); Sue Dolan (E-mail); Sumana R. Rajagopalan (E-mail); Tammy Isenhour (E-mail); Ted Roth (E-mail); Teresa D. Bliss (E-mail); Teri Garrick (E-mail); Theresa Staab (E-mail); Thor Forseth (E-mail); Tim Johnston (E-mail); Tim Wickersham (E-mail); Timothy L. Tisinger (E-mail); Tina Geyer (E-mail); Tina Kavanaugh (E-mail); Tina-Marie Martinez (E-mail); Tom Evans (E-mail); Tom Feeley (E-mail); Tom Mulholland (E-mail); Traci Miller (E-mail); Tracy Phillips (E-mail); Vanessa Cameron (E-mail); Wayne Salter (E-mail); Wendy Renfro (E-mail); William (Butch) Nickerson (E-mail); William Osborn (E-mail); Yanie Mccormick (E-mail); Zara Courns (E-mail)

Subject:        ----EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY----

November 20, 2001

ATTENTION ALL SHIPPERS/NOMINATING AGENTS AND PLANT OPERATORS:

----EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY----

Due to the continuing warm weather and other operational considerations, Public Service Company (PSCo) cannot accept either:

Imbalance payback gas from Shippers/Nominating Agents
More gas than PSCo's transport customers will consume each day

3.      More gas than what is currently confirmed from each plant into PSCo's system each day

Plant Operators should restrict deliveries to confirmed nominations ONLY EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY AND UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE; if over-deliveries become a problem during this period, PSCo will activate flow control valves on any plants involved.

Shippers/Nominating Agents should not nominate any imbalance payback to PSCo EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY AND UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE.  Any imbalance gas remaining on the system for this period will be cut to -0- by PSCo.

ADDITIONALLY; EFFECTIVE GAS DAY NOVEMBER 22 AND UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE:

Any gas volumes nominated by Shippers/Nominating Agents that exceed consumption on a contract-by-contract basis may be cut by PSCo to a volume that equals the average daily usage for the month of November.

 Sincerely,

Monica Nedbalski
Senior Transportation Specialist

David Briggs - Xcel Energy
Project Administrator
Certified Web Designer
Phone: (303) 571-7812
     Fax: (303) 571-7001
 Email: David.Briggs@Xcelenergy.Com

<<...OLE_Obj...>>


PSE&G just called and want to trade natural gas online and want to make sure
that they can trade it under the GISB.  They want to amend the ETA to that
effect.  I'm not sure how we want to handle this.  Get Stacy/Jeff's approval
that their gas trades can go under the GISB, and then amend the ETA?  The
woman who called is Denise Pocius at (973) 430-8181.


Here is the presentation for the 2:30 meeting today


The only person I planned to send this to (at this time) is George. Do you have any thoughts on it before it goes?

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Christopher P. [mailto:CPJohnson@brobeck.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 4:40 PM
To:	Brownfeld, Gail
Subject:	Letter to Brownfeld.DOC

Gail:
Attached is my analysis of Sempra's evidence on liability.  I think this is more than what you had in mind, but, once I started laying out particular pieces of evidence, I thought you and I (and probably Richard Sanders and others) would be better served if I analyzed the evidence in some depth.  I apologize for its length, but I think you will find it useful.
Please note in particular footnote 2.  I think I have figured out what
Sempra will identify as the ambiguity that requires the denial of our
liability motion and the introduction of parol evidence.  In short, the
contract may not be airtight on our most important liability issue.
Finally, I think you should limit the people with whom you share this letter.  I tried to be as objective as I could on this, and some of my analysis/critique might not be welcomed by all readers (e.g., Braverman and Golias, and thus, Bruce Americus, too).  If you want to distribute this beyond your superiors, I might want to tone down some statements.
<<919 Letter to Brownfeld.DOC>>
Please give me a call after you've read it.  I'll get you the other deliverables (particularly including the damage analysis) to you shortly.
By the way, Happy New Year!  I've been wishing over the past few days that I was Jewish, so I could say that the events of last week occurred last year, and that I am already operating on a clean slate.  As it is, Christopher Paul Irish Catholic has to wait until December 31!!  Jeeeez!!
CPJ
Christopher P. Johnson
Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, LLP
1633 Broadway
New York, New York 10019
(212) 237-2558
(212) 586-7878
cpjohnson@brobeck.com

=====================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


got it,,,, thanks!


indolent (IN-duh-lehnt) adjective

   1. Disinclined to exert oneself; habitually lazy. Conducive to inactivity
      or laziness; lethargic.

   2. Causing little or no pain. Slow to heal, grow, or develop; inactive.

[Late Latin indolens, indolent-, painless : Latin in-, not + Latin dolens,
present participle of dolere, to feel pain.]

   "Wherever it came from, the musical came with its hair mussed and
   with an innocent, indolent, irreverent look on its bright, bland
   face.
   Walter Kerr, On musical comedy, NY Herald Tribune, Sep 1, 63.

"I love mankind. It's the people I can't stand." Do you ever find yourself
repeating these words of cartoonist Charles Schultz? Maybe you just happen
to be around persons described in this week's AWAD. We have all been
somewhere when almost everyone around seems less than charming. But remember,
just like the fingers of a hand, it takes all kinds to make this world. -Anu

.............................................................................
If I have seen farther than others, it is because I have stood on the
shoulders of giants. -Isaac Newton, philosopher and mathematician (1642-1727)

Q: Some time ago you featured a quote/word about x in AWAD. Could you resend
it?
A: You may search the archives at http://wordsmith.org/awad/search.html
   or browse them at http://wordsmith.org/awad/archives.html All the
   words and quotes since the beginning of AWAD are available there.

Pronunciation:
http://wordsmith.org/words/indolent.wav
http://wordsmith.org/words/indolent.ram


I will leave Houston around 10:30 tomorrow, so lunch should be around 1:30.
Then I am free for at least a couple of hours before I have to go to the
Hyatt.  I will leave SA on Friday at noon if you want a ride home or if you
want me to follow you.  I think however you leave earlier than that and thats
ok.  I will be tied up the rest of the time there.

Love, Dad


Hi Christie and Alhamd,

I spoke with Mark and Steve (as Steve is the Rice contact and must be
comfortable with our donation) and we have decided that Enron's
contribution/donation will be $5K - as the ONLY difference between the $10K
and $5K donation is in the amount of complimentary passes Enron receives for
the event.  For a $10K donation we receive 10 passes and for a $5K donation
we receive.....take a guess.......you're right..... 5 complimentary passes.

If we need additional passes we should be able to leverage Rice for some as
we've given them tons of money.

Regards,

Cindy


what about smu area?

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 11/17/2000 08:43:16 AM
To: "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE:

Well, the closest one I know is the Crescent Court and that is REAL nice and
REAL expensive.  There are La Quintas and other shitty places scattered all
around there.  Of course in Downtown Dallas you could probably find quite a
few decent places to stay and that is real close to the cotton bowl.  Here
are some other possibilities:

http://www.hyatt.com/usa/dallas/hotels/hotel_dfwrd.html

http://www.180096hotel.com/cgi-bin/hotelinfo?SID=NDS&Dest=DFW&LKF=NDS&HotelI
d=DFW%20BRI%20&HName=BRISTOL%20HOUSE%20SUITES&Rating=3.0&Return=Prev

http://www.180096hotel.com/cgi-bin/hotelinfo?SID=NDS&Dest=DFW&LKF=NDS&HotelI
d=DFW%20WYNA&HName=WYNDHAM%20ANATOLE&Rating=4.0&Return=Prev

Saturday would be good for me if you can squeeze it in.  I am going to see
Dad tonight.  I will be there at about 7.

Where are you going to be, that puts you on that side of town?

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 7:58 AM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject: Re:

I can do the tv but I am busy all weekend so, if I can do it next week let
me know.  I might be able to squeeze it in on Saturday b/c I will be out
that way.

On another note, do you know of any hotels in the cotton bowl area in
Dallas?


The Word of the Day for May 19 is:

                  weird  \WEERD\  (adjective)
                  *1 : of, relating to, or caused by witchcraft or the
supernatural
                  : magical
                  2 : of strange or extraordinary character : odd, fantastic

                  Example sentence:
                  "Hagar, the witch, chanted an awful incantation over her
                  kettleful of simmering toads, with weird effect." (Louisa
May
                  Alcott, Little Women)

                  Did you know?
                  You may know today's word as a generalized term for anything
                  unusual, but "weird" also has older meanings that are more
                  specific. "Weird" derives from the Old English noun "wyrd,"
                  essentially meaning "fate." By the late 8th century, the
plural
                  "wyrde" had begun to appear in texts as a gloss for
"Parcae,"
                  the Latin name for the Fates -- three goddesses who spun,
                  measured, and cut the thread of life. In the 15th and 16th
                  centuries, Scots authors employed "werd" or "weird" in the
                  phrase "weird sisters" to refer to the Fates. William
                  Shakespeare adopted this usage in Macbeth, in which the
                  "weird sisters" are depicted as three witches. Subsequent
                  adjectival use of "weird" grew out of a reinterpretation of
the
                  "weird" in Shakespeare.


The report named:
<http://trv.dev.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=7&report_name
=Intramonth+Texas+P/L&category_cd=4&category_name=TEXAS&toc_hide=1&sTV1=
4&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=06/07/2001> Intramonth Texas P/L, published
as of 06/07/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Sara,

Further to our telephone conversation last week, I would be grateful if you
could
let me have your comments on the revised draft ISDA documentation sent
through to
you.

We are very keen to finalise the ISDA and CSA as soon as possible next week. I
look forward to hearing from you.

Regards
Megan Duffill

Fleur Turner wrote:

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: ISDA-MSCS-ENRON
> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 12:57:35 +0100
> From: Fleur.Turner@msdw.com
> Reply-To: Fleur.Turner@msdw.com
> Organization: Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.
> To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
>
> Please see attached.
>
> Regards
>
> Megan Duffill
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                            Name: 2_0205432.doc
>    2_0205432.doc           Type: Microsoft Word Document
(application/msword)
>                        Encoding: base64
>                 Download Status: Not downloaded with message

 - Megan.Duffill.vcf


hey. give me a call tonight at 901-528-0914. it is  tuesday the 28th


Charlie:
Sorry for the delay with the e-mail, I just got back into the office from
traveling.  We are working hard to sell these assets before year-end -
they're a beast.  This Friday does not look good for lunch, but I think
Tuesday or Wednesday of next week works.  I hope this works for you as well.
Talk to you soon.
Regards,
Ben


Dear AIM(SM) user,

johngriffith65 has asked to change the e-mail address for the following screen name
from john.griffith@enron.com to john31.griffith@enron.com:

    johngriffith65

If you DO NOT wish to make this change, PLEASE REPLY to this e-mail
and type 'OK' as the text of your message.  If we receive your reply
within 72 hours the change request will be canceled.

If you want this change to take place, you can ignore this e-mail.
Instead, go to your new e-mail address and confirm the e-mail we are
sending there.  Only reply to this e-mail if you do not want to change
your AOL Instant Messenger e-mail address.

Thank you for using the AOL Instant Messenger(SM) service.


Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 09:42 AM -----

	Mike D Smith@EES
	05/25/2001 09:12 AM

		 To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Marianne
Castano/HOU/EES@EES, Deborah Culver/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle
Maynard/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Freed/HOU/EES@EES, Edwin Essandoh/HOU/EES@EES,
Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: jmaas@llgm.com
		 Subject: New Master Form

Attached you will find the latest draft of the new Master Form.  Please
review and send me any comments today--we'd like to get this out to the
business team by 3:00 today.  I think all of the comments we received and
developed in the last 3 meetings have been incorporated, including the
bankruptcy matters.  Because there are so many changes, I don't think a
blackline would be helpful--however, let me know if you want one.   I have
bracketed questions and open issues and highlighted areas that I think need
either more work or extra attention from the business teams.  I'd like to see
us be able to pare this document down just a bit--I think a 5 page master and
a 1 to 1 1/2 page confirmation is reasonable.  Thanks.   MDS


-----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 7:00 PM
To: Comnes, Alan; Schwarz, Angela; Aden, Beverly; Votaw, Bill; Barreda,
Brenda; Moffett, Carol; Corbin, Cathy; Foster, Chris; Liscano, Christina;
Sutter, Craig; Leff, Dan; Whitehead, Debora; Benevides, Dennis; Black, Don;
Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT; Huth, Douglas; Sacks, Edward; Melvin, Eric;
Dupre, Erika; Hughes, Evan; Deltoro, Fran; Muench, Gayle; Dernehl, Ginger;
Savage, Gordon; Buchanan, Harold; Kingerski, Harry; Waser, Iris; Steffes,
James; Lewis, James; Wright, James; Messina, Jeff; Blachman, Jeremy; Hewitt,
Jess; Hartsoe, Joe; Denne, Karen; Bass, Kathy; Dodgen, Kathy; Gustafson, Ken;
Hughes, Kevin; Lopez, Leasa; Botello, Leticia; Muller, Mark; Suggs, Marsha;
Sunde, Marty; Eggleston, Meredith; Etringer, Michael; Mann, Michael;
Cisneros, Michelle; mpalmer@enron.com; Bresnan, Neil; Hong, Neil; Kaufman,
Paul; Warren, Paula; Zdunkewicz, Richard; Leibert, Richard; Shapiro, Richard;
Hennessy, Rita; Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES; Tijerina, Rosalinda; McCubbin,
Sandra; Novosel, Sarah; Gahn, Scott; Stoness, Scott; Dick, Sharon;
skean@enron.com; Leslie, Tanya; Lair, Tasha; Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT;
Greenlee, Terri; Belden, Tim; Spruiell, Tony; Sharp, Vicki; Gorny, Vladimir;
Curry, Wanda; Bradford, William S.; Corbally, Kathryn; Whalan, Jubran; Riley,
Tony; Sanders, Richard; Williams, Robert C.; Wolfe, Greg; Wright, James;
VanUlden, Dirk; Walker, Steve; Rudolph, Jennifer; Wenzel, Martin; Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES; wgang@enron.com; Scott Govenar; Hedy Govenar;
jklauber@llgm.com; Smith, Mike; Neslage, John; Guerrero, Janel; Eric
Letke/DUB/EES@EES; Sanders, Richard; gfergus@brobeck.com; Tribolet, Michael;
Frank, Robert; Sanders, Richard; gfergus@brobeck.com; Mara, Susan; Gil,
Mercy; Thome, Jennifer; Leboe, David
Subject: Summary of the MOU

The following is an outline of the basic terms of the Southern California
Edison Memorandum of Understanding:

? Commitment to Provide Power ) SCE will keep its current generation plants
and other generation assets and commit them to provide power on a regulated
cost-of-service basis for 10 years.
? Dedication of Power ) Edison International will commit the entire output of
Sunrise (one of Edison International,s non-regulated generating facilities)
to the State on a fixed price basis for 10 years. Phase I of Sunrise is to be
brought online by August 15, 2001. If not brought online by August 15, 2001,
Edison International shall be assessed a $2 million penalty.
? Transmission Sale ) SCE will sell to the State its transmission assets for
approximately $2.76 billion (2.3 times the net book value of the assets),
subject to certain adjustments. Of the $2.76 billion, the $1.5 billion gain
on sale, will be used to reduce SCE,s net undercollected amount as of January
31, 2001. In connection with the purchase, the State will also assume certain
liabilities associated with the transmission assets.
? Backup Transaction ) If the transmission sale does not occur within two
years for reasons beyond the parties, control, then if the State elects, SCE
shall sell to the State SCE,s hydro generation assets. If the hydro assets
are not worth $1.5 billion, then SCE will also sell the state after December
31, 2010 enough below-market-price-power to make up the shortfall.
? Conservation Property ) SCE shall grant perpetual conservation easements to
the State covering approximately 260,000 acres of its Big Creek hydroelectric
related lands and 825 acres of its Eastern Sierra hydroelectric related
lands.  Some of the land may be deeded in fee.
? Contribution by Edison International ) Edison International will refund to
SCE not less than $400 million.  This money will consist of a refund of
approximately $293 million in estimated 2000 quarterly tax payments plus
approximately $197 million in federal loss carryback tax savings.
? Investment ) Edison International and SCE will invest not less than $3
billion over the next 5 years in capital improvements for SCE.
? Litigation ) SCE shall dismiss certain claims, including its takings and
filed rate doctrine cases.
? CPUC Regulation ) CPUC shall continue to regulate SCE using historical
principles of ratemaking.
? Payment for Portion of QF Drop-off ) SCE shall pay an amount that
represents that portion of the net short from January 18, 2001 to April 1,
2001 that is attributable to QF,s not selling to SCE (due to SCE,s failure to
pay the QF,s).  SCE will securitize this amount.
? Securitization ) SCE shall securitize its full net undercollected amount
(approx. $3.5 billion).  The securitization shall occur in two tranches (i.e.
two different nonbypassable dedicated rate components).

? The first tranche will occur after the passage of legislation and the
signing of the definitive agreements and will cover the net undercollected
amount, less the gain on sale, plus interest on certain obligations in the
net undercollected amount.
? The second tranche would be triggered if the transmission sale does not
occur within two years.  Accordingly, the second tranche would not show up in
rates for two years, if at all.

? Buying the Net Short ) The State will be required to buy the net short
through December 31, 2002.  After 2002 SCE will be responsible for covering
the net short.
? Investment Recovery ) SCE shall have an authorized rate of return that will
not drop below its current rte (11.6%) during the 10 year cost of service
ratemaking period.
? Next Steps (Definitive Agreements and CPUC Action):

? Definitive Agreements ) Once the MOU is signed, the next stage is to
negotiate definitive agreements which contain the specific terms of the
transmission sale, as well as the specific terms of the various other related
agreements (e.g., the O&M Agreement, Transmission Services Agreement and the
Facilities Services Agreement).
? CPUC Action ) Prior to entering into the definitive agreements, the CPUC
must undertake certain actions (which include: establishing mechanisms for
preapproval of procurement costs and URG costs, deferring SCE,s general rate
case until 2003, granting SCE some relief from direct access credits and
clarifying the first priority condition in the holding company act).


We are talking to him.  I am having him talk with a number of commercial people.  He has little regulatory background and knowledge of key market issues.  That being said, he appears to me to be very bright and capable.  Will let you know how our discussions conclude.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Sat 2/2/2002 4:52 PM
To: Haedicke, Mark E.; Steffes, James D.
Cc:
Subject: Eddy Daniels

is outstanding (I think anyway)- can we hire him?

Maybe in Reg?


Steve:

You might also want to take a look at the  UK Minister for Trade and
Industry's speech at the same conference- I already sent it to Mark
Schroeder.

?Regards,

Lauren

(See attached file: UK Environment speech.doc)

From: Steven J Kean@ENRON on 10/16/2000 09:25 PM

Sent by:  Steven J Kean@ENRON

To:   Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Kelly Kimberly/Enron
      Communications@Enron Communications, Lauren Goldblatt/NY/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:  Fwd:Ford chairman calls climate change world's #1 issue

----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 09:25 PM -----

                    Cynthia
                    Sandherr            To:
                                        cc:
                    10/16/2000          Subject:
                    12:48 PM

Joe and Tom:  Either Bill Ford is a major Democrat or this signals a major
shift which serves as a strong indicator that Congress will face new
pressures next Congress to address Global Warming.  This is truly a
remarkable speech.

FORD PREDICTS END OF CAR POLLUTION
The Independent (UK)
6 October 2000

Internet:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/UK/Environment/2000-10/ford061000.shtml

The 100-year reign of the polluting internal combustion engine is coming to
an end, Bill Ford, chairman of the Ford Motor Company, said yesterday. It
will soon be replaced in motor vehicles by the hydrogen fuel cell, which
emits no pollution whatsoever and so can reduce the build-up of greenhouse
gases causing climate change, Mr. Ford, great-grandson of the company's
founder, Henry Ford, told the Greenpeace Business Conference in London.

In a remarkable speech from a motor manufacturer, in which he proclaimed
his
own environmental credentials, Mr. Ford, 43, accepted that the automobile
had
had a serious negative impact on the environment, and that his industry had
wrongly played down the threat from global warming.  And the head of the
world's second biggest car company raised eyebrows even further when he
said
that he could foresee the day when people would not want to own cars, but
merely have access to mobility.

Detroit-born Mr. Ford, who has been chairman since the start of last year,
proclaimed that climate change was the most challenging issue facing the
world and that anyone who disagreed was "in denial". Ford itself had moved
on
from that position, he said. But he felt the Kyoto protocol, the 1997 pact
in
which the industrialised nations agreed to try to limit their emission of
greenhouse gases, would not provide deep enough cuts to halt global
warming.
Only the marketplace, making new technology widely available, could tackle
the problem.

A fuel cell creates energy by an electrochemical process similar to that in
a
battery: it lets hydrogen and oxygen react together to produce electricity
and water vapour. It does not run down or need recharging, working as long
as
the hydrogen fuel is available, but most importantly, it does not produce
any
CO2, the basic by-product of any carbon-based fuel such as oil, gas or
coal.
Every major car company in the world is throwing huge sums into developing
the technology: Ford is spending $1bn (?690m) between now and 2004, while
Daimler-Chrysler, regarded as the leader in the field, has spent $700m. All
the main manufacturers have prototype fuel-cell cars running and there is a
race to bring them to market. Honda and Toyota expect to do so in 2003,
while
Ford and Daimler-Chrysler are aiming at 2004.

"I believe fuel cells will finally end the 100-year reign of the internal
combustion engine," Mr. Ford said, adding that the technology was "the holy
grail" of the motor industry. Prophesying the demise of car ownership, he
said:  "The day will come when the whole notion of car ownership is
antiquated," he said. Mr. Ford was reflecting advanced motor industry
thinking, which suggests many people might not want to pay for a car of
their
own if they could be guaranteed mobility on demand from a local hire
network.

 - UK Environment speech.doc


Ok to copy.

	Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/01/2001 04:32 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: FW: Please Approve New Product Type:  US Steel Hot Rolled Plate
Financial Swap (2069)

Please acknowledge your agreement to the copying of profiles as shown
directly below.  Please respond by 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 2.

Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Moran, Tom
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 2:15 PM
To: Lees, Lisa; Sever, Stephanie
Cc: Guidroz, Walter
Subject: FW: Please Approve New Product Type:  US Steel Hot Rolled Plate
Financial Swap (2069)

Lisa / Stephanie,

Please copy the existing counterparty profile from US Steel Hot Rolled Fin
Swap and utilize it for this new product;
US Steel Hot Rolled Plate Fin Swap.

Regards,
tm

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Cass, Robert B.
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 1:19 PM
To: Taylor, Mark; Blumenthal, Jeff; Taylor, Mark; Musch, Susan; Gockerman,
Matthew F.; Hayden, Frank; Herod, Brenda F.; Moran, Tom; Hagelmann, Bjorn;
Roenz, Manfred
Cc: Lees, Lisa; Sever, Stephanie; Jones, Tana; Lambert, Karen; Sweitzer,
Tara; Kenne, Dawn C.; Moorer, Torrey; Meredith, Kevin; Lozano, Melba; Walker,
Chris; Alatorre, Carlos; Carter, Carl
Subject: Please Approve New Product Type:  US Steel Hot Rolled Plate
Financial Swap (2069)

Please approve the following product type in Datamanager after 11:00 a.m.
See the steps for approval below.

US Steel Hot Rolled Plate Fin Swap

Website Short Description of Product Type:  US HR Plate Swap    ("US Steel
Hot Rolled Plate Fin Swap" - #2069)

Product Type:
A U.S. Hot Rolled Steel Plate financial Swap Transaction with Enron North
America Corp. under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays
the price submitted by the Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in
each case in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each
calendar month during the Term of the Transaction will be a Determination
Period; provided that, if the Term of the Transaction is less than one
calendar month the Determination Period shall be the Term of the
Transaction.  The Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be the
volume submitted by the Counterparty via the Website.  The Payment Date(s)
will be 5 business days after the Floating Price is determinable.  The
Floating Price shall be the Index for the relevant Determination Period.

Reference Period:
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date to the
Termination Date.  The Effective Date is _______and the Termination Date is
____________.

Product Additional Information (example):
The Index for a Determination Period shall be the average price for
"Domestic, Midwest Plate ($/net ton)" in the table "US Current & Forecast
Prices" under the current month's heading in the monthly issue of MBR (Metal
Bulletin Research) North American Steel Markets Monthly with the published
month the same as the Determination Period.

Currency:
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.

Unit of Measure:
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be net tons (2000
lbs) and the quantity shown shall be in net tons per month.

The financial GTC's are attached as follows:

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


Debra,

Have you been able to get a copy of the Enron North America/U.S. Department of Interior contract? Our contract number is 96057231.

Judy


** Please be advised that this information is confidential and proprietary.  We ask that this confidential information be treated as such, in accordance with applicable laws and regulations governing disclosure of confidential information by gas marketers such as Enron.


Mr. Boytinck:

I am sending this e-mail to check on the status of the Master Agreement for Garden City Plaza Ltd. that was forwarded to you for execution.  It would be appreciated if you would let me know the status.

Thank you!

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com


Kay,

I don't know the answer to your 1st question since I don't recall ever
having to have insurance certificates on any of the other Facility
Agreements.  Maybe we did, but I just forgot that detail.  Jaap/Kent? do you
know?

The Retention LC was faxed this am to Greg Lang and Isabell Parker.  Jaap's
Admin Asst can fax you a copy (Carla Corly) if you wish.

Also, need to talk about Austin Tech reps being added to Facility Agreement
asap (Mike Storm says they've worked out 1700 hours with Eric Booth).  But
we need something in the interim that confirms this will be added into the
Austin Facility Agreement (e-mail to me OK).

Regards,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 8:43 AM
To: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE); Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP); Smink, Jaap
(PS, GE AEP)
Subject: Signatures for Certain Documents

Good morning.

I haven't seen the insurance certificate she references.  Anyone know where
it is?

Is the retention letter of credit available yet? I know it has been
requested, but I don't recall seeing that it has been delivered.

Thanks for everything,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/02/2001 08:37
AM ---------------------------

"Chow, Susan D." <susanchow@paulhastings.com> on 05/01/2001 07:45:03 PM

To:   "'ccampbell@kslaw.com'" <ccampbell@kslaw.com>, "'kay.mann@enron.com'"
<kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Lang, Gregory F." <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>

Subject:  Signatures for Certain Documents

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 05/01/01 20:45:12
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of
conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are
two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.
If you have any questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

============================================================================
==

"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."

============================================================================
==

Attached please find signature pages for:
GE  Consent, Consent of Director for transaction.
We  will forward signature pages for
Amended LLC Agreement, Consent of Director  and Members tomorrow morning
upon receipt from Fed  Ex.

Please confirm that insurance certificates have  been received from the
insurance broker.? It is my understanding that  originals were sent to
Enron.
Thanks.

Susan D. Chow
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker  LLP
1055 Washington Boulevard
Stamford, Connecticut 06901
(203) 961-7527
(203) 359-3031 (fax)
NOTE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: susanchow@paulhastings.com

(See attached file: ge_conse.pdf)
(See attached file: salmon_d.pdf)


Howard,

The conference call is confirmed. Friday, June 1, 9:00 a.m. Central
Time.
Mark Tawney, the Head of our Weather Desk will participate.

The call will originate from my office, EB1962, 713 853 3848.
Shirley Crenshaw's number is 713 853 5290.

Vince

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Kunreuther, Howard" <kunreuth@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Kunreuther+2C+20Howard+22+20+3Ckunreuth+40wharto
> n+2Eupenn+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:49 AM
> To:	Kaminski (E-mail)
> Cc:	Kleindorfer, Paul; Convery, Theresa; Fang, Fang
> Subject:	Contact Info for Conference Call Tomorrow at 10 am EDT
>
> Vince:
>
> Paul and I are looking forward to our conference call tomorrow at 10
> am EDT.
>
> I can be reached at  610 664-8776
> Paul can be reached at 412-268-5960
>
> Please let Kate and Theresa (both copied on this message) know whether
> we are to call a number or whether someone will be calling us
> tomorrow. Thanks.
>
> Howard
>
>  Howard Kunreuther
> Cecilia Yen Koo Professor of Decisions Sciences and Public Policy
> Chairperson   Operations and Information Management Department
> 1326 Steinberg Hall-Dietrich Hall
> Wharton School
> University of Pennsylvania
> Philadelphia, PA 19104-6366
> Phone:215-898-4589
> FAX:215-573-2130
> Email:kunreuth@wharton.upenn.edu
>


What is going on about this deal?  Can we get this resolved today?

Robert:  Who requested Valero to be split out?

Thanks!

Julie

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2000 09:28
AM ---------------------------

Tina Valadez
04/06/2000 01:01 PM
To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Equistar Deal Tickets

Are you still available to assist Robert with entering the new deal tickets
for Equistar?  After talking with Bryan Hull and Anita Luong, Kyle and I
decided we only need 1 additional sale ticket and 1 additional buyback ticket
set up.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tina Valadez/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2000 12:56
PM ---------------------------
From: Robert E Lloyd on 04/06/2000 12:40 PM
To: Tina Valadez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Equistar Deal Tickets

You'll may want to run this idea by Daren Farmer.  I don't normally add
tickets into Sitara.

Tina Valadez
04/04/2000 10:42 AM
To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Equistar Deal Tickets

Kyle and I met with Bryan Hull this morning and we decided that we only need
1 new sale ticket and 1 new buyback ticket set up.  The time period for both
tickets should be July 1999 - Forward.

The pricing for the new sale ticket should be like tier 2 of Sitara #156337
below:

The pricing for the new buyback ticket should be like tier 2 of Sitara
#156342 below:

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks,
Tina Valadez
3-7548


Yes. Where are you?
Heather Kroll


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 07:19 AM -----

	John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	04/10/2001 03:47 PM

		 To: Robert Vote@ENRON, Randy Pais@Enron, Richard B Sanders@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Writ of Garnishment of money due CIGSA  - Employee Payroll for
11 April

Enrique Valero, our onsite project management, just sent the attached note.
Most urgently, payday for about 300 employees is tomorrow, and the employees
are expecting this check before the Easter holy week holiday starts.

If possible without violating the order, , we would like to get the employees
paid. Bob, I can't remember how we solved this last time out, but I remember
it was an issue. Please call so we can discuss.

 JWVS

	Enrique Valero
	04/10/2001 02:28 PM

		 To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Simm Powell/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Pearson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Brand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, William
Fitch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vladimir
Gorescu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: URGENT STOP PAYMENT: Writ of Garnishment of money due CIGSA
served on EECC on April 10

John:

Please give further advise as how to operate down here in Tampico. We are in
the middle of (3) Projects, where we (Enron/Cigsa) have commitments to pay
out that are project related:
Labor
Labor Taxes
Materials
Consumables
Import Duties
Miscellaneous
Payment for Transportation of Structures (Barge/Tug)

The funds to pay the above are in CIGSA Construccion's name, although I am
one of the two authorized signatures in the bank, and no funds can be moved
unless I sign a check.

What is the impact of the below message on the above categories?

Also, what about when we CIGSA/Enron/ODB (CAByL) receive payments? CIGSA
invoices CAByL and then the money is wired to Enron. What is the impact on
this?

Please advise as soon as possible.

Regards,
EV

04/10/2001 02:14 PM
Mark Brand
Mark Brand
Mark Brand
04/10/2001 02:14 PM
04/10/2001 02:14 PM
To: Enrique Valero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Simm
Powell/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Michael Pearson/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: URGENT STOP PAYMENT: Writ of Garnishment of money due CIGSA served
on EECC on April 10

Enrique/Simm:

Please see John Schwartzenburg's note below.  We are to halt any further
payments to, or on behalf of, CIGSA, effectively immediately until further
direction by Mike Pearson.

Mark

----- Forwarded by Mark Brand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 04/10/2001 02:10 PM -----

	John Schwartzenburg
	04/10/2001 01:53 PM

		 To: Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nigel
Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Reistetter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen P
Stein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian Stanley/EU/Enron@ENRON,
Kenneth L Bean/HOU/EES@EES, johng@nepco.com@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nigel Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Keith Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Reistetter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen P
Stein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Lakes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Brand@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Willie Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jude
Rolfes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian
Stanley/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kenneth L
Bean/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, johng@nepco.com@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
steved@nepco.com@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, danielh@nepco.com, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Randy Pais@Enron, Jim
Desrochers/NA/Enron@Enron, Larry Bishop/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Costa/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John G
Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Claudia Santos@Enron, Wyndel McNamara@ENRON, Richard
Murphy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shirley
Oliver/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kristi
Dobbs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mayra Mendez@Enron, Angie
Chappell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Mark E Haedicke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B Sanders@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Robert Vote@ENRON, Joseph T Grajewski/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Mark Brand@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael Pearson/NA/Enron@Enron, Vladimir
Gorescu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: URGENT STOP PAYMENT: Writ of Garnishment of money due CIGSA served
on EECC on April 10

EECC has just been served with a writ of garnishment from the 333rd Judicial
District Court of Harris County  in connection with a judgment against
certain CIGSA entities. In the writ, the court very unambiguously and very
plainly commands that EECC is not to pay any debt or deliver any property to
CIGSA pending further orders from  the court. The writ was issued to enforce
an judgment  for $1.3 million awarded by the court against CIGSA in favor of
Richard P Estrada. EECC is also commanded to appear before the court and list
all funds/assets in our possession that might belong to CIGSA,  and to
disclose what other persons we know ofif any, that might have such funds or
assets.  The lawyer for Mr. Estrada is the same lawyer who successfully
garnished EECC in the past to collect sums owed other CIGSA judgment
creditors.

Please take this prohibition as applying even to cases where CIGSA might be
entitled to the money or the property under our contracts with them, or where
the funds or property are in joint venture acounts or custody in the US or
Mexico until we have had a chance to review matters in detail and make a more
accurate assessment. In the meantime, effective immediately, do not make ANY
payments to or on behalf of, or release ANY property to or on behalf of, any
CIGSA entity without first obtaining legal department approval. The court may
impose penalties for violations  of its garnishment order.

We will assemble an appropriate litigation team to work onthis matter. Randy
Pais will be handling this for EEOS legal. I suggest that Mike Pearson and
Mark Brand get the word out to the Project Management and Project Control
teams on  this matter ASAP.

JWVS


Sara,

FYI:   The Confirm desk has had a difficult time in receiving confirmations
for trades done with BNP Paribas.  Under ENA's master with Paribas, Paribas
was designated as the Confirming Party.

As you will see below in an earlier email last week Diane asked for the
specific language set forth in the Paribas ISDA since they ere designated a
the Confirmting Party.

At this time, please advise Diane since her most recent query calls for legal
advise.

Thanks

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2001 02:45 PM -----

	Diane Anderson@ENRON
	05/15/2001 02:43 PM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ?

One final question (hopefully) on this particular issue:

Since the Master doesn't define promptly, I'm wondering how this effects
the New York Statute of Frauds (confirmation sent within 5 days must be
responded to within 3 days)?  If BNP isn't even getting the confirm to us
within 5 days, where do we stand with them?

Can we start sending them our confirmation just so something is out there
acknowledging the deal...until we receive and execute theirs?

Thanks,
Diane

Susan Bailey@ECT
05/14/2001 08:36 AM
To: Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: ?

Diane,

Here is how the operative part of the provision entitled "Procedures for
Entering into Transactions." reads:

 "On or promptly following the date on which the parties reach agreement on
the terms of a Transaction....... Paribas will promptly send to ENA a
Confirmation."

As you can see no specific number of days is designated, only that the
confirmation will be promptly sent once the parties agree to the terms of a
Transaction.

Hope this helps.

"Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com

	Diane Anderson@ENRON
	05/11/2001 05:20 PM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ?

Thanks.   No rush, Monday or whenever, could you take a look at BNPParibas
and see if there
is any mention of how fast they'll get us their confirm.  They are
consistently really slow in getting
them to us, and if it exists, I'd like to be able to quote the terms of the
Master to them when I
format my nasty letter to them. :)

Thanks,
Diane

Susan Bailey@ECT
05/11/2001 04:58 PM
To: Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: ?

Diane,

For those Counterparties that are the confirming party, I would have to say
that the arrangement is on a counterparty basis, and what ENA may have
negotiated.

Legal would have to look at the specific Master to ascertain the timing for
that counterparty who is the confirming party.

Typically, ENA prefers to me the confirming party so that there is method of
time to follow.  But as you know some counterparties may win out and be
designated as the confirming party.

Therefore, if you have a specific counterparty in mind let me know and we
will take look at their Master.

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com

	Diane Anderson@ENRON
	05/11/2001 04:46 PM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ?

Susan,  this is a general question, but I don't know if there is a specific
answer
for each counterparty:

For counterparties that are the confirming party, is there a standard time in
which
the are required to send us their confirm...? ...or is it just a "best
effort"  type thing,
specific to each CP?   We have some counterparties that are great, send us
their
confirms T+1.....but a few take 3,4,5 days to get them here....and I'm just
wondering
if there is any kind of mention of this in the Master Agreement.

Thanks,
Diane


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/17/99
03:05 PM ---------------------------

"Martin Jermakyan" <martin@electrapartners.com> on 12/14/99 11:30:29 AM
Please respond to "Martin Jermakyan" <martin@electrapartners.com>
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: A paper of mine

Vince,

I have written a paper, which supposedly is going to be published in the
February 2000 issue of EPRM, probably after some editorial cuts (at least
this is what I am being told by them).  I would appreciate your thoughts if
you would have time to read it.

Regards,
Martin

 - Userconf.doc


FYI.  Talking tomorrow am is fine.  I have a 900 conference call on another
matter; otherwise, I'm open.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2000 04:58
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           06/06/2000 04:39 PM

To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Vitro termination agreement

I've made some changes, which I thought I would circulate internally for
comment before sending to GE.

I left Jeff Smith a voice mail asking how the initial payment is supposed to
be split between the on and offshore contracts since this document references
payments to both.

Comments?

Kay


We are willing to sit at the table and negotiate.  SADIST has pushed us to the brink!  We have infiltrated the SADIST camp and know are in possession of a toaster, AND blender.  We have joined sides with EPLF to demand that our paper supply stays in high demand.  If our demands are not met by the end of today, we will be forced to sign over all our Enron stock options to your organization.  This will cause your organization to implode!!

CCA (Crumb Crunchers of America)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lokey, Teb
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:21 AM
To:	Buehler, Craig
Cc:	Green, Alma; Studebaker, James ; Carpenter, Nancy; Giambrone, Laura; Veatch, Stephen; Kilmer III, Robert; Lichtenwalter, Blair; Thompson, Debra; Doll, Jeanette; Paschal, Zelda; Culwell, Christi; Allen, Kelly; Dietz, Rick
Subject:	Toaster

We will never negotiate with toaster terrorists!  We will eat raw bread forever rather than turn over a single sheet of paper - or even a single chad - to those who would resort to such extortion.  If we give in now, we will only encourage such acts in the future.  First our microwaves, then our filtered water dispenser, then our refrigerators will become targets of these evil doers.  Rather, we will hunt down those responsible for this dastardly act, and bring them to justice or justice to them.  We will also go after any department supporting the evil doers as well as anyone who partakes of bread (or Eggos or pop tarts) toasted in the purloined appliance!

EPLF -- you're TOAST!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: EPLF
Subject: FW: Paper Situation

We have your toaster!!!  You'll get it back when our demands are met.
Leave 4 boxes of 8 1/2 x 11 paper (no damn 3 hole punch paper either)
under the TV on the west end of the 39th floor and you'll be toasting
away within a few hours.  This isn't from Craig; we've hacked into his
email...

Enron People's Liberation Front (EPLF)...

-----Original Message-----
From: Green, Alma

Getting paper for the floor is out of my hands.  I have had three calls this morning plus a note left on my desk to order paper.
Donna Scott is working with the mail room.

Our toaster that Rick Dietz bought when we moved down here is missing this A.M.  Has been reported to Facilities who will report to Security.  If anyone knows anything, would you please let me know!

	Tnx, Alma G.


- 151_170PIP_Language.zip


---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/HOU/EES on 11/14/2000 07:24
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Rafael Avila                           11/13/2000 05:53 PM

To: lwells@wyndham.com, Ching Lun/HOU/EES@EES, Kim Chick/HOU/EES@EES, Angie
Ramirez/HOU/EES@EES, Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES, Christina
Barthel/HOU/EES@EES, Dara M Flinn/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Fwd: A woman and a man are involved in a car accident; it's a

You girls will love this. Ha-Ha

>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > A woman and a man are involved in a car accident; it's a bad one.
>>>>Both
>>>> > >of
>>>> > > > their cars are totally demolished but amazingly neither of them
>>>>are
>>>> > >hurt.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > After they crawl out of their cars, the woman says, "So you're a
>>>>man;
>>>> > > > that's interesting. I'm a woman. Wow,  just look at our  cars!
>>>>There's
>>>> > > > nothing left, but fortunately we are unhurt. This must be a sign
>>>>from
>>>> > >God
>>>> > > > that we should meet and be friends and live together in peace for
>>>>the
>>>> > >rest
>>>> > > > of our days."
>>>> > > > Flattered, the man replied, "Oh yes, I agree with you completely!
>>>>This
>>>> > > > must  be a sign from God!"
>>>> > > > The woman continued, "And look at this, here's another miracle.
>>>>My
>>>>car
>>>> > > > is completely demolished but this bottle of wine didn't break.
>>>>Surely
>>>> > >God
>>>> > > > wants us to drink this wine and celebrate our good  fortune."
>>>> > > > Then she hands the bottle to the man.  The man nods his head in
>>>> > >agreement,
>>>> > > > opens it and drinks half the bottle and then hands it back  to
>>>>the
>>>> > >woman.
>>>> > > > The woman takes the bottle, immediately puts the cap back on, and
>>>>hands
>>>> > >it
>>>> > > > back to the man.
>>>> > > > The man asks, "Aren't you having any?"
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > The woman replies, "No. I think I'll just wait for the
>>>>police..."
>>>> > > > Moral of the story: Women are clever bitches. Don't mess with
>>>>them.
>>>> > > >   >>
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>>> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
>>>>http://www.hotmail.com.
>>>> >
>>>> > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>>>> > http://profiles.msn.com.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dgold@sonic.net>
Received: from mta3.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta3-pr.rcsntx.swbell.net) by
sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net (Sun Internet Mail Server
sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id
<0G1H0065R8BYPZ@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net> for sshackl@sims-ms-daemon; Mon, 25
Sep 2000 23:26:42 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from marine.sonic.net ([208.201.224.37]) by mta3.rcsntx.swbell.net
(Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with SMTP id
<0G1H00D1U89O3L@mta3.rcsntx.swbell.net> for sshackl@Sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net;
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 23:25:00 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (qmail 14131 invoked from network); Tue, 26 Sep 2000 04:26:11 +0000
Received: from sub.sonic.net (208.201.224.8) by marine.sonic.net with SMTP;
Tue, 26 Sep 2000 04:26:11 +0000
Received: from loie (e186.nas23.sonic.net [208.201.225.186]) by sub.sonic.net
(8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA24535 for <sshackl@swbell.net>; Mon, 25 Sep
2000 21:26:11 -0700
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 21:27:07 -0700
From: Dan Goldfield <dgold@sonic.net>
Subject: Re: Visit to your winery
To: sshackl@swbell.net
Message-id: <003301c02772$086d26e0$bae1c9d0@loie>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-envelope-info: <dgold@sonic.net>
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
References: <39D007F2.92BE45EB@postoffice.swbell.net>
X-Priority: 3
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

Sara,

I'm looking foreword to seeing you.  Let's speak by phone before you come
in.  I'm sure we could work something out on one of the days you prefer.
I'm in the thick of it fight now, so it's a bit hard to think of the
specifics at the moment.

Looking foreword to speaking with you

dan

----- Original Message -----
From: <sshackl@swbell.net>
To: <dgold@sonic.net>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 7:20 PM
Subject: Visit to your winery

> Hi, Dan!  I'll be in Napa/Sonoma during the second week of October,
> specifically, on Monday - Wednesday,  October 9, 10 and 11.  Please let
> me know which day is convenient for you for me to drop by and say hello
> and take that case of pinot noir off your hands.  If the timing works
> for you, I think that Tuesday or Wednesday would be preferable for me.
> I'll be staying in Napa.  I look forward to hearing from you.  I hope
> you received me earlier message.  Thanks.  Sara
>


Here is the latest changes from our conference call.  Please make your
changes and send back.  Thanks
Ben


Greg,

Please see the attached draft of the Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement for
your review.
Upon your review, please give me a call to discuss any questions and or
comments you may have regarding this matter.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


See last story attached.  Congratulations, it looks like you are shaking
things up in typical Enron fashion.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/14/2001
03:41 PM ---------------------------
From: Ann M Schmidt on 07/13/2001 05:13 PM

To:

cc:  (bcc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron)

Subject: Enron Mentions

Wisconsin Gas to Purchase Nine Mile Line From Northern Natural Gas
PR Newswire, 07/13/01

Commodities Review: LME Copper Hit By Another Stock Rise
Dow Jones Commodities Service, 07/13/01

LME Base Metals: Copper Pressured Down By Stock Build
Dow Jones Commodities Service, 07/13/01

UK: Telecoms, drugs drive FTSE 100 rally, Vodafone leads.
Reuters English News Service, 07/13/01

Futures Contract Covering Coal Debuts in New York (Correct)
Bloomberg, 07/13/01

Enron: Panacea or Pariah?
Modern Metals, July 2001

Wisconsin Gas to Purchase Nine Mile Line From Northern Natural Gas

07/13/2001
PR Newswire
(Copyright (c) 2001, PR Newswire)

Line Will Enhance Competition in Southeast Wisconsin and Use Existing
Facilities

MILWAUKEE, July 13 /PRNewswire/ -- Wisconsin Gas, Northern Natural Gas and
Guardian Pipeline announced today that Wisconsin Gas has signed an agreement
with Northern Natural Gas (NNG) to purchase a nine mile, high pressure
natural gas pipeline in Walworth and Waukesha counties. The purchase price is
$5 million. The proposed transaction will require approval from federal and
state regulators. The pipe, known as the Eagle line, is located southeast of
the Kettle Moraine Forest near Eagle, Wis.
The existing line has been part of the NNG interstate transmission system.
Under the new ownership, the line will become part of the Wisconsin Gas
distribution system and will interconnect with Guardian Pipeline as well as
the NNG system.
"Northern Natural Gas is pleased to be a part of a creative, cost-effective
solution to provide additional gas service to southeastern Wisconsin," said
Dave Neubauer, vice president of business development and marketing, Northern
Natural Gas. "This transaction enables Wisconsin Gas and its customers to
obtain natural gas supplies from Guardian or NNG. Providing reliable,
economical choices for consumers will benefit all of the parties involved."
"We saw this as an opportunity to minimize environmental impact and still
realize the benefits of increased competition in the natural gas market,"
said James Schott, senior vice president, Wisconsin Gas. "The purchase of the
Eagle line will enable Wisconsin Gas to further our goal of providing
cost-efficient natural gas service to our customers."
As a result of the purchase Guardian Pipeline, the 141-mile interstate
pipeline from Joliet, Ill. to Ixonia, Wis., will no longer build an 8.5-mile
lateral to Eagle. The lateral was part of the originally certified Guardian
Pipeline. This portion of the line would have generally run parallel to the
current Northern Natural pipeline.
"This sale is a win-win situation for Guardian and consumers," said George
Hass, project manager of Guardian Pipeline. "The Eagle line purchase by
Wisconsin Gas saves Guardian time and resources by taking away the need to
build the 8.5-mile lateral and allows all three companies to create a better
environment for competition in the natural gas marketplace."
The existing gate stations at LaGrange and Eagle will remain in-service for
regulation purposes. Odorization and measurement will take place at a new
gate station that will be constructed at the interconnect with Guardian. This
new gate station will be called the Bluff Creek station and will be located
near Whitewater. The Bluff Creek gate station will be constructed during the
construction of Guardian Pipeline.
Northern Natural Gas, a subsidiary of Enron Corp., with a market area
capacity of about 4.3 Bcf/d, provides natural gas transportation services to
utility customers in the upper Midwestern United States through its
approximately 16,000 miles of pipeline.
Guardian Pipeline is a partnership of three Midwestern energy companies: CMS
Energy, based in Dearborn, Mich.; Wisconsin Energy, headquartered in
Milwaukee, Wis.; and Viking Gas Transmission Co., a wholly owned subsidiary
of Xcel Energy Inc., and located in St. Paul, Minn.
Wisconsin Electric-Wisconsin Gas, the principal utility subsidiary of
Wisconsin Energy Corp. (NYSE: WEC), serves more than one million electric
customers and more than 960,000 natural gas customers throughout Wisconsin
and Michigan's Upper Peninsula. Visit our company's Web site at
www.WE-WG.com. Learn about Wisconsin Energy Corp. by visiting
www.WisconsinEnergy.com
MAKE YOUR OPINION COUNT - Click Here
http://tbutton.prnewswire.com/prn/11690X86200271

/CONTACT: Media only: Kelly Farr of CMS Energy, 313-436-9253; or Megan
McCarthy of Wisconsin Energy, 414-221-4444; or Gina Taylor of Northern
Natural Gas, 713-853-7681/ 17:01 EDT

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Commodities Review: LME Copper Hit By Another Stock Rise
By Mark Long and Steve McGrath
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

07/13/2001
Dow Jones Commodities Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

LONDON -(Dow Jones)- Copper futures traded in London fell Friday, as a
further influx of stocks into official warehouses put the copper market under
pressure and dragged down the rest of the base metal complex.
Three-month copper traded on the London Metal Exchange ended $6 down from
Thursday's late kerb close at $1,554.50 a metric ton.
An increase of 7,475 tons of copper into LME warehouses Friday brought total
stocks up to a 12-month high of 550,300 tons. This pressured prices in early
trade down to test $1,550/ton support, although prices recovered slightly in
later trade.
Unconfirmed market talk said Enron is behind much of the week's stock rise,
in an effort to ease nearby supply tightness and to alleviate the large short
positions it is thought to have built up on the July-for-a-week spread, which
is currently showing a $6-$8/ton backwardation. The July futures contract
will switch over to cash Monday.
Enron declined to comment on the market talk Friday.
A backwardation is a pricing structure in which deliveries to be made in the
near future are more expensive then those set for a more distant delivery.
The opposite situation is called contango.
"The spreads are still tight. The major longs are still reluctant to lend,
with no signs of that (tightness) dissipated," said Kevin Norrish, an analyst
with Barclays Capital in London.
Dealers and analysts said they expect further stock increases next week.
The entire base metals complex ignored Thursday's 237-point rally in the Dow
Jones Industrial Average, dealers said.
"Copper has been sensitive to moves in the stock market, but not this time,"
Norrish said. In fact, now it appears that base metals markets ignore
equities markets when they rally, but follow stocks down when they slump, he
added.
European Grain Futures See Profit-Taking, But More Gains Expected
European grain and oilseed futures were hit by a bout of profit-taking and
pre-weekend position-squaring Friday, after rising to long-time highs,
brokers said.
However, world and domestic crop concerns, the strength of the dollar and
general bullish sentiment will carry the markets to fresh highs short term,
they said.
On the London International Financial Futures and Options Exchange, the
benchmark November feed wheat contract ended just 25 pence up at GBP82/ton,
after hitting a new two-year high of GBP83/ton in early trade.
Meanwhile, Matif November rapeseed futures fell EUR2.75 on the day to
EUR265/ton, after hitting a three-year high of EUR271/ton in early trade.
The U.K. wheat crop and the French rapeseed crop are forecast to be well down
on last year, and wheat and canola crops in some other major producing
countries are also expected to fall.
Meanwhile, the strength of the dollar is allowing European grain and oilseed
traders to up prices and still remain competitive against U.S. imports and
dollar-denominated grains on the world market.
-By Mark Long and Steve McGrath, Dow Jones Newswires; 44-20-7842-9358;
mark.long@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

LME Base Metals: Copper Pressured Down By Stock Build

07/13/2001
Dow Jones Commodities Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

LONDON -(Dow Jones)- London Metal Exchange three-month copper ended Friday's
late kerb lower compared with Thursday, pressured by another stock build,
dealers said.
(LME three-month metals prices in dollars a metric ton at 1600 GMT, with the
previous late kerb close in parentheses. Comex copper at 1641 GMT in cents a
pound, with the previous close in parentheses.) Copper 1,554.50 (1,560.50)
Tin 4,452.50 (4,502.50)
Aluminum 1,452.25 (1,458.50) Zinc 871.50 (877.50)
Nickel 5,925.00 (6,012.50) Lead 462.50 (465.00)
Comex Sep Copper 70.75 (70.80)
An increase of 7,475 tons of copper Friday brought total stocks up to a
12-month high of 550,300 tons. This pressured prices in early trade down to
test $1,550/ton support before rising slightly to close at $1,554.50/ton,
down from Thursday's close of $1,560.50/ton.
Unconfirmed market talk said Enron is behind much of the week's stock rise,
in an effort to ease nearby supply tightness and to alleviate the large short
positions it is thought to have built up on the July-for-a-week spread, which
is currently showing a $6-$8/ton backwardation. The July futures contract
will switch over to cash Monday.
Enron declined to comment on the market talk.
A backwardation is a pricing structure in which deliveries to be made in the
near future are more expensive then those set for a more distant delivery.
The opposite situation is called contango.
"The spreads are still tight. The major longs are still reluctant to lend,
with no signs of that (tightness) dissipated," said Kevin Norrish, an analyst
with Barclays Capital in London.
Dealers and analysts said they expect further stock increases next week.
The entire base metals complex ignored Thursday's 237-point rally in the Dow
Jones Industrial Average, dealers said.
"Copper has been sensitive to moves in the stock market, but not this time,"
Norrish said. In fact, now it appears that base metals markets ignore
equities markets when they rally, but follow stocks down when they slump, he
added.
Aluminum also ended the late kerb lower Friday.
News of the restart of some smelters has dampened sentiment, despite a stock
drawdown of around 8,000 tons since the end of last week, dealers said.
"The stock drawdowns are fairly small percentage-wise," said Standard Bank
analyst Robin Bhar, adding that they would need to be much larger to
significantly improve market sentiment.
"A test of $1,435/ton cannot be ruled out, though we would expect forward
buying to prevent a break below this level for the time being," Barclays said
in a market report.
Zinc continued its slump, falling to a seven-and-a-half-year low, mainly on
technicals.
Technicals also hurt nickel, which rose slightly after breaking $5,900/ton
support but still closed at its lowest level since April.
Nickel's fall was "just on some speculative liquidation and short selling,
mostly chart-based," Bhar said.
-By Mark Long, Dow Jones Newswires; +44-20-7842-9356; mark.long@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

UK: Telecoms, drugs drive FTSE 100 rally, Vodafone leads.
By Camila Reed

07/13/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

LONDON, July 13 (Reuters) - Britain's largest companies raced higher at the
close on Friday fired by telecoms and drug stocks as they bounced back from
Wednesday's 16-week low.
Index heavyweights Vodafone and GlaxoSmithKline provided 27 of the day's
55-point gain, while technology firms wobbled. However, the telecoms giant
surged 4.1 percent to 157-1/4p.
The FTSE 100 finished 55.4 points or one percent firmer at 5,537.0, having
jumped 1.66 percent on Thursday after seven consecutive losing sessions, with
gainers outnumbering losers by three to one.
Stocks steamed higher and refused to be derailed by sluggish U.S. retail
sales figures for June, which showed only a meagre rise, and a weaker Wall
Street, but volumes were thin at 1.4 billion shares.
By London's 1530 GMT finish the blue chip Dow Jones industrial average was
down five points, while the tech-laden Nasdaq Composite Index was flat,
having streaked up in the previous session.
Mike Lenhoff and Simon Rubinsohn at money managers Gerrard said that the UK
equity market was deeply oversold and long-term this presented a buying
opportunity for UK equities.
DRUGS SEE-SAW
Drugs reversed an earlier decline with Nycomed Amersham among the day's top
performers, up nearly four percent at 536-1/2p and AstraZeneca rising over
one percent.
Mining giant Anglo American moved into the FTSE 100 top ten gainers with a
three percent rise, as investors sought refuge in mining stocks as a cyclical
play.
Another major gainer was British business services firm Hays Plc up 3.4
percent. The shares leapt on market talk that Germany's Deutsche Post was
looking to make a bid for it, dealers said.
Both Deutsche Post and Hays declined to comment.
Firmer crude prices gave support to the oil sector. BP rose 0.6 percent to
572 pence and Shell also added 0.6 percent to 581-1/2p lifting the index by
four points.
FTSE MIXED PICTURE
But dealers and analysts said it would be a mixed picture going forward with
the market scrutinising data for signs of a sustained economic recovery or a
lapse in consumer confidence.
"This week we had a really bloody day on Wednesday and then the opposite on
Thursday, so we're going to be on a rollercoaster still. It's very fragile
but it does show the potential of the market," said Foreign & Colonial
director of UK equities David Manning.
"It's not only the holiday period, it's also that the market can make you
look an idiot one day to the next. In that sort of circumstance the
temptation is to do very little," he said.
ABN Amro strategist Gareth Williams said the market would make modest
progress over the next month or so, with moves downward quite likely although
the trend would be upwards over the course of the year.
TECHS DIP
Thursday's 5.3-percent rally in the Nasdaq failed to bring any cheer to UK
technology shares. Logica and Colt Telecom slid four percent, while microchip
designer ARM fell 3.9 percent to 223 pence trimming Thursday's 13 percent
jump.
The techMARK index of technology shares rose 0.98 percent to 1,602.87.
Elsewhere on the downside, UK holiday operator Airtours lost nearly 10
percent of its value after Swiss peer Kuoni issued a profit warning.
Among second liners, Baltimore Technologies closed up 3.3 percent. It
initially rallied 22 percent after the Irish Internet security firm said it
received an approach from an unlisted British-based company for an all-paper
deal to combine the companies.
The FTSE 250 Mid-cap index finished 5.1 points stronger at 6,163.8.
Among small-caps, Paladin Resources' shares jumped 10 percent after the UK
oil explorer said that major shareholder U.S. oil giant Enron had sold the
whole of its 40-million-share stake via HSBC bank for 44 pence a share.
Britain's Litho Supplies Plc slumped 42.5 percent after the company, which
supplies printing and graphic arts products, said that sales in the first six
months of 2001 were on target, but profits would likely be below expectations
due to tough market conditions and pressure on margins.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Futures Contract Covering Coal Debuts in New York (Correct)
2001-07-13 08:48 (New York)

Futures Contract Covering Coal Debuts in New York (Correct)

     (Corrects location of FirstEnergy Corp. in 10th paragraph of
story that moved yesterday.)

     New York, July 12 (Bloomberg) -- The New York Mercantile
Exchange today began trading a futures contract for low-sulfur
coal, a fuel that President George W. Bush said will play a major
role in meeting electricity demand over the next two decades.
     The contract's debut came after prices for coal, considered
the dirtiest of power-plant fuels, doubled in the past year, as
demand from power plants outstripped mine production. Coal for
September delivery opened at $42 a ton and settled at $40.75, as
98 contracts were traded, exchange officials said.
     ``We had a big run-up in coal prices this past winter,'' said
Andy Ozley, who buys coal for Atlanta-based Mirant Corp.'s six
coal plants in New York, Illinois, Maryland and Virginia. ``This
contract affords us a way to mitigate our exposure'' to large
price swings.
     The Bush administration said in an energy policy report this
spring that coal would be the dominant fuel for electricity
generation through 2020. Bush gave an added boost to the fuel when
he retreated from a campaign pledge to restrict carbon dioxide
emissions, implicated in global warming.
     Coal plants are responsible for a third of the nation's
carbon dioxide emissions. They also produce sulfur dioxide, which
causes acid rain, and nitrogen oxides, which cause smog.
     The Nymex started the futures contract to give mining
companies and utilities a way to hedge their risks in the $33
billion coal market. Producers such as Peabody Energy Corp. and
Arch Coal Inc., whose shares have soared in the past year, have
said they would trade the futures.

                            New Plants

     Last year's quadrupling of prices for natural gas -- a
cleaner-burning power-plant fuel -- prompted many generators to
ramp up output from their coal plants. Utility coal stockpiles
dwindled, and prices have risen to their highest levels since at
least 1989.
     So far this year, more than a dozen companies have announced
plans to build coal-fired plants, including Kansas City, Missouri-
based Kansas City Power & Light Co. and Portland, Oregon-based
PacifiCorp.
     Although coal is used to produce 52 percent of the nation's
electricity, few plants were built during the 1990s because of the
high costs of building them and the difficulty of complying with
federal and local environmental regulations.
     Demand for coal has eased in recent weeks as below-normal
temperatures in the U.S. Midwest and Northeast reduced demand for
air conditioning, said Jim Parks, who buys coal for six power
plants in Ohio and Pennsylvania as director of fuels at Akron,
Ohio-based FirstEnergy Corp.
     ``The summer's been pretty mild so far -- you haven't seen
any big heat waves'' in regions with the most coal generation, he
said.

                           Big Sandy

     The Nymex futures contract calls for the delivery of 1,550
tons of low-sulfur coal to the mouth of the Big Sandy River near
Huntington, West Virginia. From there, the fuel would be loaded
onto Ohio River barges and shipped to power plants in the U.S. and
possibly Europe.
     The new contract is tailored to producers in Appalachian
states that account for about 40 percent of U.S. production,
including West Virginia, Kentucky and Pennsylvania, the No. 2, 3
and 4 coal producers.
     The industry lacks a futures contract for coal from Western
states that account for 47 percent of the nation's production,
including the No. 1 producer, Wyoming.

                         Avoiding the Past

     The exchange, which earns commissions on trades, hopes coal
futures will avoid the fate of other contracts it has started over
the past few years. Its six electricity futures contracts have
fizzled, as has its Middle East sour crude oil contract, which
debuted in May 2000.
     ``I said yesterday, if you traded 100 to 200 contracts, that
would be a really a good day,'' said Chris Casale, vice president
of energy trading at Dynegy Inc. in Houston, which trades coal and
buys the fuel for its six power plants in New York and Illinois.
``It came out sort of on target.''
     Most of today's trading was originated by large energy
marketing companies, he said, although he declined to say whether
Dynegy traded any contracts. Enron Corp., the largest energy
trader, and Duke Energy Corp., the largest U.S.-based utility
holding company, have said they would trade coal futures.
     Exchange officials have said the coal market has the
potential to reach 5,000 trades a day after a year of trading.
     The Nymex's 17-year-old crude oil futures contract averages
about 66,700 trades a day, and its 11-year-old natural gas
contract averages about 33,500.

                           Wary of Coal

     ``The coal market is still lacking liquidity,'' said Anthony
McAuley, a floor broker at ABN Amro Inc., who said he bought five
coal contracts for a client at $42 a ton -- the market's first
transaction. ``You probably need to see a little more
participation'' from industry coal buyers and sellers for the
market to take off.
     Independent floor traders, known as locals, are wary of
trading coal futures without assurances that the industry will be
active as well.
     ``Floor traders lost millions'' in electricity futures when
some were caught with high-priced contracts and nobody in the
industry to sell them to, he said.
     ``Because of that, people are a little bit tentative about
coal,'' said Tom Schiff, an independent crude oil trader. ``We're
here to help make liquidity but we can't tackle all the risk.''

		Modern Metals, July 2001

		Giant energy concern now turns its attention to steel. The company's
aggressive posture has begged controversy. Industry reactions vary from
hand-wringing to open arms. Still others characterize Enron as a "non-event."
		By Michelle
Martinez Arjona,
Editor-in-Chief,
and Paul Hohl,
Contributing Editor

		These days, saying the word "Enron" in a room full of metals executives is
like screaming "fire" in a crowded theater. For most in the steel industry,
the idea of a futures market is enough to raise a few eyebrows. But when a
major market maker with annual revenues of 10 times the market cap of the
U.S. steelmaking industry stakes a claim (for 2000 alone, Enron logged
revenues of $101 billion--that's with a "b"), a lot more than eyebrows are
likely to be raised. After a bold presentation from Jeff McMahon, president
and CEO of Enron Industrial Markets, at the SSCI annual convention in May (in
which he accused steel mills of treating their service center customers as
"annoyances"), industry leaders rushed to understand this latest market
contender.
		Friend or foe? Competitor or partner? These are just a couple of the
questions surrounding Enron's aggressive push into the metals industry.
Judging from the service center and mill executives Modern Metals queried,
there are as many answers as there are opinions in the industry. Reactions
ranged from fear to acceptance to downright resentment. At least one mill was
reticent to discuss Enron at all--still others seemed to meet the issue with
unaffected shrugs. If the saying is true that all publicity is good
publicity, the buzz that Enron has generated would make even a Hollywood spin
doctor envious.
		What's the hubbub?
Although products such as natural gas and energy--Enron's major business
platform--have been traded as commodities for years, until Enron's appearance
a formal forward market for steel has never existed. According to McMahon,
the absence of a liquid and transparent market has resulted in "uninformed
investment decisions" that have exacerbated the current oversupply situation,
and left companies exposed to the hazards of price volatility.
		Enron's answer is to offer a variety of financial hedging products along with
forward contracts in hot-rolled, cold-rolled and galvanized (plate and long
products are soon to follow), locking in prices for as many as five years
out. Enron contends that it can act as a "risk intermediary" in steel
transactions, ensuring healthier profit margins and lowering the cost of
capital. Certain grades of steel are commodities, McMahon insists, and as
such should be bought and sold on a commodity market basis, instead of the
strategic relationships that now exist between the mills and consumers. Enron
has been offering steel online, and via phone and fax, since November of last
year.
		"Before you add capacity, before you make an investment decision, you'll be
able to see a three, five, maybe even a 10-year forward price of steel,"
McMahon stated, "and if you want to hedge that investment you can do that."
		The company plans to buy steel at a floating price and then sell it to steel
consumers at a fixed rate, making money on the spread. In February, Greg
Hermans, VP of steel trading at Enron, reported to AMM that it was offering
U.S.-made 10-gauge, 48-in. wide hot-rolled for April delivery in Chicago for
$225 a ton. Hermans said Enron was buying the same product for April delivery
at $215 a ton.
		Eventually, Enron sees the development of four different marketplaces: the
Northeast, the Midwest (or Chicago area), the Gulf Coast (or Houston area),
and the West Coast. Enron will hedge against spot price spikes through equity
and physical holdings in domestic mills. The company closed on Huntco's
Arkansas-based cold-rolling mill in June.
		"It's a big portfolio," McMahon said. "We wanted to put together a portfolio
of supply and demand. In some cases, we'll own assets--hopefully we'll own
some term contracts with domestic mills. To the extent that imports are a
part of the equation, we'll be a part of that market. We may purchase
capacity from somebody, not necessarily the assets, but toll slab through a
hot strip mill. All of those combined is how we do our business."
		Steel mills can benefit, McMahon said, by entering into a multi-year
"physical off take" with Enron, thus giving steel mills a degree of certain
volume and on product specification. Enron would guarantee purchase of a
specified amount of tonnage, and use a floating price or a floor price to
guard against market shocks. Whether mills would be willing to divert
capacity to the commodity grades being bought and sold by Enron remains
uncertain. At least one mill executive privately said no . . . at least for
now.
		Nucor president, CEO and vice chairman, Dan DiMicco also sees little value in
Enron's proposal. "What we need to have is stable pricing at levels where the
most efficient mills can make a good return on their capital and further
invest in new technologies and equipment," he stated. "I define true value as
helping the industry to become stronger. It doesn't do any good to maintain a
lack of price volatility at $200 a ton."
		Keith Busse, CEO at Steel Dynamics, echoed that sentiment in a recent New
Steel article. "If you're trying to get volatility out at $320 [per ton],
great," he said. "But at $230, you want to stick your fingers down your
throat."
		For the service centers
Service centers, McMahon suggested, could benefit immediately. "The only way
[distributors] are able to hedge themselves is to go out and buy inventory,"
he explained. "That takes capital, and cash, and space. We can offer a
financial product that gives the exact same protection, but doesn't require
any of the above.
		"We can hold those inventories and price the steel at the time of delivery to
the service centers," he continued, "so their 4- or 5- percent net margins
are somewhat certain."
		"I do think that Enron is providing a service for the industry . . . "
commented Dave Lerman, CEO of Steel Warehouse, South Bend, Indiana. But he
pointed out that "how [it] moves forward will be interesting. If they just
move forward with hedge instruments . . . that's independent of whether you
run your business well by having a good supplier that matches up with the
demands of your customers. I think [Enron] will be a good thing for some
people and a non-event for others."
		Beyond hedging, McMahon pointed out, firm and enforceable contracts could
become a key benefit to service centers. As one Midwestern distributor source
commented, "One of the terrible things that happens in our business is that
end users demand long-term pricing, beyond what anybody can foresee. When
they anticipate the market is going up, or that it has hit a low point, they
push harder for it--as any one would. But historically, they don't honor the
deals."
		In a down market, he explained, customers demand lower prices. Noncompliance
can result in orders, but no releases, and a "don't call us, we'll call you"
attitude from customers. The consequence for service centers, he said, are
price reductions on the way down and on the way up. "If Enron brings
integrity to both sides of this market," he concluded, "that would be a very
big plus for the steel industry."
		But integrity, another Midwest service center exec countered, has got nothing
to do with it. In his estimation, Enron is like a profiteering carpetbagger,
"trying to make a buck in between the producer and the user. That's all we
need right now," he declared, "somebody trying to squeeze out a few more
dollars." But, he recognized, "we're all going to have to deal with it."
		Don McNeeley, president and CEO of Chicago Tube & Iron, indicated that some
good could come of a heavy-hitter like Enron introducing new ideas into the
industry, but acknowledged that people might be offended by somebody picking
the so-called "low-hanging fruit" of the steel market in the current economy.
"What do you think the mills are going to do when you come to them for just
the peripheral items?" he queried. "My concern would be that the price would
go up on [those items]."
		McNeeley also questioned the wisdom of distributors relinquishing control of
their inventories. "In distribution, 60 percent of our net worth is
inventory, 30 percent is accounts receivable, and 10 percent is plant
property and equipment," he related. "Our single largest asset is our
inventory. If a distribution company surrenders control of its inventory to a
third party, does not that distributor, in effect, surrender its own
sovereignty?"
		Only just begun
Questions abound regarding Enron's role as a physical supplier of steel as
well. As one Minnesota-based service center exec put it, "are they ready to
deal with problems?"
		Although Enron has expressed interest in being a physical supplier, Dave
Lerman explained, "I think that's going to be a lot more difficult to
implement." Enron would have to consider specific qualities, coil sizes,
nuances of chemistry, surface quality, and formability. "Most customers
require better than standard tolerances," he pointed out. "These are all
issues that might complicate commodity sales."
		Delivery is another issue. As a physical supplier, Enron has virtually
guaranteed just-in-time delivery, but as one service center source said, "the
guarantee is good when the material shows up at my door. What happens if it
doesn't show up? I disappoint a customer. What good does it do to sue [Enron]
if I've lost a customer?"
		Mill executives have questioned whether Enron is a potential competitor.
"They see Enron as someone likely to buy foreign steel in order to deliver it
to a U.S. customer," said Chuck Bradford, principal of Bradford Research and
a long-time industry observer. He cautioned against seeing Enron as too much
of a physical supplier, speculating that the future of Enron, similar to the
LME, will be in hedging. "You may see some [physical transactions] to start
with," Bradford predicted, "just to get the ball rolling. But I don't see
that as the way the market will develop."
		McMahon has been consistent in saying that Enron has little interest in
becoming a steel manufacturer. The real value, he said, is in a transparent,
liquid market. "We know the products work, we know the market wants them. Can
any one particular mill or mills prevent that? We don't think so," he said.
"It's not an 'if', it's a 'when'."
		The jury is still out on just how soon that "when" will come, and what those
effects will be for the steel industry. And for all of the debate surrounding
the issue, it seems a bit soon to be hitting the panic button. As Don
McNeeley recounted, "I can recall similar controversy over a speech a guy
gave about 15-17 years ago. That guy's name was Ken Iverson, and he had this
concept called a mini-mill. Look at it now."


The issue of respect can be addressed in one simple two word phrase - DRAFT
DODGER!!


Hi Lyn:

I have not received an answer for the below request for another Sun
computer.  Did you get it?

We also need to order another regular computer like the others that have
been supplied to the Research Group.  It will be for Tanya Tamarchenko
and her location on the 19th floor is EB 1940.  Tanya has two offices and
does not have a computer in her office on the 19th floor.

Co# 0011 - RC# 100038

Thanks!

Shirley Crenshaw

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2000
03:39 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
01/12/2000 11:14 AM
To: Lyn Malina/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Sun Computer

Hi Lyn;

The Research Group is in need of another Sun Computer to be located at
EB1951.  Please let me know that ETA.

CO. # 0011 - RC# 100038

Thanks!

Shirley
3-5290

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2000
11:10 AM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
01/07/2000 01:49 PM
To: Lyn Malina/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex
Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: New PC

Hi Lyn:

Alex Huang has requested a new PC and Vince Kaminski has ok'd it.  Please
order the computer as listed below in Alex's request.

Thanks!

Shirley
3-5290

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
01:48 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
01/07/2000 12:12 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex
Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: New PC

Shirley,

OK.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
12:02 PM ---------------------------

Alex Huang@ENRON
01/07/2000 08:28 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New PC

Hi Shirley,
I would like to request for a new PC.  My current PC is quite old with not
enough memory.  Twice
I ran out of memory and had to have IT people coming to clean it for me.
Their suggestion is
to either get a new hard drive or a new PC.  Given that Dell has Pentiumc III
Processor at 800 MHz
on market, I would like to request a PC with process at 500 MHz or higher
level.
Thank you very much.

Best,
Alex


Ken:

We will have a brief meeting with you to describe the context of the
conference that you are keynoting on Wednesday and go over some of the major
themes of your talk.

Dennis Vegas will describe Enron's co-sponsorship of the conference and the
attendees, and David Haug will talk about our LNG strategy and partnering
opportunities in the context of your remarks.

We are leaning toward a straight speech rather than a powerpoint presentation
but can still do some slides.  I am close on a draft and will get this to you
shortly after our meeting.

The participants at the meeting in addition to me will be:

Hamd Alkhayat
Dennis Vegas
David Haug

- Rob


Sally,
I want wanted to congratulate you on your promotion to Managing Director.  I
wish you the best of luck.
Jennifer Medcalf
Senior Director
Global Strategic Sourcing-Business Development
Office: (713) 646-8235
Fax:    (713) 646-2450
Mobile:(713) 562-7199


537948

broker has light load


Thanks for you nice note.  I miss seeing you on 33.  Hope that all is going
well for you.  --Sally

	Susan Skarness
	01/16/2001 09:07 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Congratulations

Congratulations on your promotion to MD Sally!  That is wonderful and well
deserved.

Susan


The following is a redline version of the execution version (so we hope)
versus the last draft you saw.  Please advise if there are any
problems/comments.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/17/2000 10:21
AM ---------------------------
From: Kathleen Clark@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 07/17/2000 09:50 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: ABB - Comparision of Rev 10 vs. 12(final)


Hello everyone,

Hope you all are doing well.
I believe the Cross Timbers rebooking nitemare has finally come to an end!
All we need to do now is send out the revised confirms.

Accounting:
Below is a list of deal numbers that were either changed, killed, or created.
I believe this is everything.

Please let me know if I seem to be missing any deals or if you have any
questions.

Best Regards and THANK YOU to everyone who has contributed to this 'project'!

Sheetal Patel
x36740

January 2001
Killed  Fin Nymex Volume reduced  Fin Basis Volume reduced Phys fwd Index
Volume Reduced New Phys fwd FP
QN3416.1         Q59778.1    Q59778.4 (271506)
QH4152.1     QH4295.1   Q59778.1    Q59778.5 (271506)
QH4318.2
QH4119.1         E90067.1/V37619.1   E90067.5 (309136)
QH4117.1         Q59784.1, .2/V37860.1, .2  Q5978.3, .4(309136)
QH4318.1

February 2001
Killed  Fin Nymex Volume reduced  Fin Basis Volume reduced Phys fwd Index
Volume Reduced New Phys fwd FP
QH4152.1     Q48050.1        Q35983.1 (434968)
QN3415.1         E90067.1/V37619.1   E90067.5 (594576)
QN3415.1         Q59784.1, .2/V37860.1, .2  Q59784.3, .4 (594576)

March 2001
Killed  Fin Nymex Volume reduced  Fin Basis Volume reduced Phys fwd Index
Volume Reduced New Phys fwd FP
QO9630.1         V37860.1, .2    Q59784.5 (594576)

April 01 - Sept 01
Killed  Fin Nymex Volume reduced  Fin Basis Volume reduced Phys fwd Index
Volume Reduced New Phys fwd FP
QO5953.1         Q59778.2, .3    Q59778.6, .7 (271506)
  QO5953.2       V37860.1    Q59784.6 (594576)


Kate-

Apb checkout     Badeer
missing deals:   Enron Buys Relaint 290.00 Apr SP15 on peak  25 mws believe
deal 553809.01, need to ch bro to apb
  Enron Sells Reliant 310.00 Apr NP15 on peak 25 mws believe deal 553810.01,
need to ch bro to apb

554166.01 Mallory, please ch Cp name to BP Energy Co

Missing Jeff Richter trades:
Enron Buys PGET
April 25 mws SP15   290.00

Enron Buys BP Energy
3/21-3/31  50 mws
SP15   330.00


Re:  Usinor SA:  that appears to be a London counterparty.  It should not be
on our list.  London Legal should approve their counterparties for ALL
products, not only European based.

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/29/2001 02:10 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-29-01

Please see attached.