Greg:

I was trying to leave you alone through all this reporting nightmare, but Shankman said you are looking for a diversion so I'll set up a time with Liz.

FYI, in Chicago we currently have 3 employees and 12 contractors.  We are budgeted for a big increase in contractors in 2002, but in reality that will never happen.  If volumes actually demand that many customer service reps, we would outsource the first call response to a 3rd party call center, and keep Chicago for questions that couldn't be answered simply and for dispatch.  Also, we are working on technology which should increase the dispatcher efficiencies.  If volumes don't materialize, downsizing contractors is easy.  The budget has the contractors in it as a place holder for costs associated with transaction growth.  One way or the other, we will have to bear the marginal transactional costs.

On the space issue, we do have extra space available, but its really close to a free option.  We decided last spring to sub-lease out the webmodal space in Lombard and move to the Enron space downtown.  When we looked at all the support costs and the marginal cost of occupying the extra space downtown it was basically a wash.  The extra seats are there if we need them.

I'll explain more when we get together.

Regards,

Dan


http://www.consultrci.com

************************************************************************

Read SCIENTECH's free SourceBook Weekly article: "Australia: Jewel in the
Crown for Some U.S. Investors" at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
************************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, October 9, 2000
Oil and Natural-Gas Shortages: Will They Create a Winter of Discontent?
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

U.S. retail energy fuel costs, already high by historical standards, are
expected to remain high this winter due to crude prices that are projected
to remain at levels unseen since the Gulf War, said the Department of Energy
on Friday. In addition, households that use natural gas are likely to see
the largest year-on-year percentage increase in their bills as well, according
to the Energy Information Administration (EIA). The agency said U.S. residents
can expect heating expenditures to increase by 25 percent for heating oil
and propane and 40 percent for natural gas.

ANALYSIS: Despite common belief to the contrary, there is a direct correlation
between the price cycles of oil and natural gas. The fact that there are
legitimate concerns surrounding the availability of both power sources
gives validity to the warnings of price increases this winter. When fuel
prices are low and natural-gas supplies are abundant, there is arguably
little connection between the two. However, the present situation as we
head into winter is the exact opposite*high oil prices and a comprised
supply of natural gas, leaving the two unquestionably intertwined. As energy
users opt to switch from oil to natural gas, this affects natural gas supply
and raises gas prices.

How did we arrive at this alarming situation, which may have been justifiably
labeled an "energy crisis"? Regarding oil, in 1998 the worldwide oil industry
witnessed a decline in oil prices*spawned in part by the economic problems
in Asia*which hit a low of less than $10 a barrel in March 1998. Oil producers
voluntarily initiated decreased production, which unsurprisingly started
a swift climb in prices in 1999, as demand started to increase in a
rejuvenated
Asia and the United States. Together, this has created a volatile mix of
substantially higher crude oil prices, lower inventories and increased
demand. Even though OPEC has made promises of up to 1.1 million additional
barrels of crude oil per day*a result of political pressure put on it by
the United States and other countries*it may not be able to force its members
to increase production, as obviously it's in the best interest of oil
producers
to keep supplies tight and prices high. In addition, even if they materialize,
these increases promised by OPEC may not be enough to meet growing demand.
This is alarming as the United States is very reliant on foreign oil, which
already accounts for about half of U.S. oil use.

The high price of oil has sent many customers looking for natural gas,
only to find that it is also in questionable supply. Most reports suggest
that natural gas heats about 55 percent of all U.S. homes. The imbalance
between supply and demand found in the oil industry is also found in natural
gas, resulting in a projected 20 to 40 percent increase in heating bills
this winter. Over the last month, prices for natural-gas futures have climbed
to record levels of more than $5 per million Btus. Yet, unlike oil, most
of the blame placed on low supply for natural gas focuses on the United
States rather than other countries. A reported 60 percent of federal lands
have been placed off limits to natural-gas drillers, leaving as many as
200 million acres (out of a total of 1.5 billion) available but restricted
for natural-gas expansion. The Clinton administration and environmental
groups have been fiercely protective of federal reserve lands and prohibited
drilling for natural gas (or oil) in states like Alaska, where some 36
trillion cubic feet of gas is known to be locked underground. At the same
time, EPA standards have become so pro-natural gas over the last decade
that few coal-fired plants have been built in the last 10-20 years, placing
an increasingly high dependence on natural gas, even though alternative
fuels are not necessarily available to serve as a substitute.

Given the connection between oil and natural gas, any successful attempt
to lower oil prices would in turn help to lower natural-gas prices. The
ability to rely more heavily on oil once again would decrease the need
for fuel switching, thus reducing the present burden on natural gas. Toward
this end, in late September President Clinton authorized the release of
30 million barrels of crude oil from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve
(SPR), the nation's emergency oil stockpile. The president's action caused
additional alarm in some groups who said that the need to tap into emergency
supplies so early in the season signaled real trouble with oil supplies.
Others said the 30 million barrels would do little to ease the problem,
and that it would take between 2 and 3 million barrels a day for one month
to reduce current crude oil prices.

So what is the solution? As noted, the issue has become politically polarized.
Within their campaign proposals, Gov. Bush proposes spending $7.1 billion
to open up U.S. energy resources and reduce dependence on foreign sources.
Specifically, Bush has proposed, among other things, opening 8 percent
of the Arctic National Wildlife Range, which probably contains about 10
billion barrels of oil. Vice President Gore opposes drilling in federal
land, and instead aims to protect the U.S. environment, increase reliance
on low-pollution fuels and focus on energy-efficiency / lower consumption
programs. Articulating the Democratic position on this issue, Senator Joe
Lieberman made the following comments last week in the vice presidential
debate: "There are more resources within the United States. If we can get
three miles more per gallon from our cars, we'll get a million*we'll save
a million barrels of oil a day, which is exactly what the refuge, at its
best, in Alaska, would produce(We've got to develop fuel cells, alternative
energy. We've got to encourage people to conserve..."

But what is the answer now, as winter fast approaches? Unfortunately, natural
gas has no emergency fund like the SPR which it can tap into. The degree
to which the oil/gas supply issue will have a dramatic impact this winter
will depend on the weather. The colder the temperature, the greater the
need for heating power sources, which will drive up the cost for both oil
and natural gas. Meteorologists are predicting a tough winter, one that
in actuality may be near normal but will seem colder after the four past
winters, which were unusually mild due to La Nia. Already, temperatures
are dipping to surprising lows across the country. Considering that it
is only early October, warnings are continuing to accumulate that supply
will be stretched to meet demand, which unquestionably will drive up the
price of energy bills.

Looking forward, much of what happens from here will depend on which candidate
is elected in November. Most within the energy industry agree that more
production is the only answer to supply concerns. Yet, expanding production
will not be an easy task, especially in an election year. This is not an
issue that is gaining high priority within Congress, as politicians aim
to end their session before the presidential election. With such exceedingly
opposed candidates, the impact that the imminent election will have on
future energy policy cannot be underestimated.

==============================================================

SCIENTECH can help you find the answers you need.  From simple questions
to complex problems, our experts and consultants will get results. Learn
more about our six service areas at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/About_RCI.html

===============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products including e-commerce and telecom in the electric utility
industry. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our free, daily
IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their full name and
email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and in the body of the email type "remove."


can you also add Karen Herrmann to the distribution?  She handles most of the day-to-day accounting.

thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, April 29, 2002 11:11 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy; Vos, Theresa
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

Opps.  Would help if I included Theresa.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, April 29, 2002 11:08 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

Sold 10,000 dth of Conger gas to TXU for 4/30/02 at $3.24, that wraps up the sales for April 2002.

Theresa, I've attached my worksheet showing how much we sold TXU for April and what price.  The daily volumes are in column M and the daily prices are in column N.  We should bill TXU for 301,000 dth and a dollar amount of $952,055.00.  Call me if you have any questions.

Thanks

 << File: MARGAS.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Friday, April 26, 2002 1:39 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

Sold 10,000 dth of Conger gas to TXU for 4/27-29/02 at $3.05.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:53 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

Sold 10,000 dth of Conger gas to TXU for 4/26//02 at $3.24

Also received a call from Jeff at Lone Star telling us to work a little harder at working off the imbalance.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:22 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

Sold 10,.000 dth of Conger gas to TXU for 4/25 at $3.29

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:49 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

We sold 10,000 dth of the Conger gas to TXU for 4/24 at $3.40

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, April 22, 2002 1:16 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick; Vos, Theresa; McMichael Jr., Ed
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

OK, Kathy and Troy have pointed out how bad my previous email was.  I'm sure I was thinking about lunch.

Sabra Dinari scheduled the gas on Lone Start.  She quit on Friday.  I will be doing the scheduling until further notice.  Kathy Kelly will be my backup when I'm out.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, April 22, 2002 11:13 AM
To:	Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick; Vos, Theresa; McMichael Jr., Ed
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

Sold 10,000 dth of Conger to TXU  for 4/23 at $3.37

Our scheduler, Sabra Dinari, quit on Friday so I will be handling the noms for awhile and Kathy Kelly will.  I think its easier for me to do the noms on this since I'm selling point specific gas and we are not putting this activity in Sitar/Unify.

Theresa, looks like I will be the one addressing the accounting questions.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kelly, Katherine L.
Sent:	Friday, April 19, 2002 8:28 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Dinari, Sabra L.; Denetsosie, Troy
Subject:	Sales to TXU for April 2002

I've sold TXU 10,000 dth at $3.14 for Sat.4/20 through Mon. 4/22

Sabra, I sold them 10,000 of Conger gas

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:24 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Kelly, Katherine L.; Dinari, Sabra L.; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Lone Star Sales to TXU for April 2002

Sold TXU 15,000 dth at $3.315 for Fri 4/19/02.

Sabra, I sold them 10,000 of Conger gas and 5,000 of the Sprayberry.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:20 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Kelly, Katherine L.; Dinari, Sabra L.
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	Lone Star Sales to TXU for April 2002

Sold TXU 10,000 dth at $3.17 for Thur 4/18/02.  I checked on the price with Darren Farmer at AEP and he said that's where Waha was trading so I don't feel like we are being taken advantage of too much.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:12 AM
To:	Mazowita, Mike; Kelly, Katherine L.; Dinari, Sabra L.
Cc:	Germany, Chris; Hill, Garrick
Subject:	Lone Star sales for Wed 4/17/02

Sold TXU 10,000 dth at $3.27 for Wednesday 4/17/02.


Hello!

As many of you already know, I have left Gunderson Dettmer to pursue other
"non-legal" opportunities!!  I am joining an internet start-up (how unique)
as VP of Business Development.  Although the site hasn't launched yet, the
URL is iwanto.com.  I'll tell you all about it later when things settle down
a bit.

**MY EMAIL ADDRESS (csellers@gunder.com <mailto:csellers@gunder.com> ) WILL
NO LONGER BE ACTIVE STARTING NOVEMBER 8 (MONDAY)**

My email address for the next three weeks is camsell@pacbell.net
<mailto:camsell@pacbell.net> , but I leave for Cuba tomorrow and will not be
back until November 25th.

Starting on November 29th, my email address will be cameron@iwanto.com
<mailto:cameron@iwanto.com>

Other work info...

Iwanto.com, Inc.
1860 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA  94303

Main number (don't know direct dial yet):  (650) 858-1000

Hope you are all doing well,

Cameron


Also Larry, there was a confirm that came in for you Friday with Amerex:
They show you Buying a 1/day  BOM (12/2-12/31) HeHub Gas Daily $7.00 Call
Option at $0.26.  The counterparty was Cinergy...Let me know if this is a
good trade and we'll get it loaded into the system.

Thanks,
Susan


East Ohio
I created deal 348393 (sale to EES).  This deal should get matched with the
purchase from Power Gas Marketing, deal 264613 for July and August.  The deal
volume is 10,000 for the month.  We have the Power Gas deal thru October.  We
still need to sell Sep and Oct to someone.

I noticed the volume for July in Power Gas Marketing is 0, so I entered an
expected volume of 0 on the EES deal.  I didn't want to mess anything up so
close to nom time.  Please put 10,000 for the month on both deals for July.

Thanks.

Peoples
I changed the volume on deal 264595 to 3500 for the month.  This volume
fluctuates each month and John Singer will tell us the actual volume.  This
deal also goes through October.

We are buying local production from Phillips Production Company.  I did not
see a deal in the system for August so I created 348434, the price needs to
be corrected.  This deal goes through November.  The estimated volume for
August is 300 per day, this volume also fluctuates each month..

We are selling all gas behind Peoples to Clinton, deal 348443.  The price on
this deal is CNG IF per mcf.  Clinton will pay us based on actuals.

Let me know if anyone has questions.


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2000 12:50
PM ---------------------------

"Barquin, John" <jbarquin@velaw.com> on 06/06/2000 09:14:52 AM
To: "Rankin, Cliff" <CRankin@velaw.com>
cc: "'rgay@enron.com'" <rgay@enron.com>, "Novak, John (Enron)"
<john.novak@enron.com>
Subject: Hermes Fee Letter

Cliff -- Can you please tell Rob and John what you need from them in order
to finalize a draft of the Hermes fee/reimbursement letter?


Ms. Daley:
Jeff Sorenson forwarded to me your March 21st letter which responded to the
Annex A letter that we sent to you.  I left Robert Schulten a voice mail
message about this some time ago and have not heard from him.  Can you and I
talk about this.  We have extended our launch date until May 1st.  Our
records indicate that there is a financial trade with GE that was done in
August, 1999.  My phone number is 713-853-3989.
Carol St. Clair


Thanks for taking the time to discuss the Enron Advisory Council today.  I
think the second topic you mentioned "Escaping the Inherent Limits of
Success" would be a great discussion starter.  I'll add it to the agenda and
look forward to seeing you there.


Steve,

Let's discuss all of your new rox products for EOL.  I would like to know
which products to roll out on EOL for April bidweek.  I would also like to
discuss creating a south of Muddy Creek product for Kern gas.  I would assume
that it would fall under the IF Kern index.

Thanks,
Mike


Per our discussion, I've modified the letter to remove reference to the
monthly pack agreement and made a couple of other minor changes.  I wasn't
able to get ahold of Bill on Friday afternoon to discuss who will sign, so
for now I've left it with signature blocks for Bill and Rod only.  I hope we
are getting closer to the target here and look forward to discussing it with
you further on Monday.  Thanks again for the illumination on AA's intent on
the earlier draft.  DF


not at the moment - we have 160000 spare (assuming schweiger is in)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	gregwhalley <8777865122@skytel.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Saturday, January 19, 2002 4:38 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Revisions

Do we have the money to do what Presto wants?


Start Date: 2/5/02; HourAhead hour: 15;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020515.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked by user 'Admin' on machine 'NAHOU-TRDTS5'.
Table
!!!General SQL error.
The field is too small to accept the amount of data you attempted to add.  Try inserting or pasting less data.
Field
!!!General SQL error.
The field is too small to accept the amount of data you attempted to add.  Try inserting or pasting less data.
Field
!!!General SQL error.
The field is too small to accept the amount of data you attempted to add.  Try inserting or pasting less data.
Field
!!!General SQL error.
The field is too small to accept the amount of data you attempted to add.  Try inserting or pasting less data.
Field
!!!General SQL error.
The field is too small to accept the amount of data you attempted to add.  Try inserting or pasting less data.
Field
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked by user 'Admin' on machine 'NAHOU-TRDTS5'.
Table


April Showers of Savings with FitRx.com Specials through April 14th
or while supplies last !

Please click below to take advantage of these specials and many more!
http://www.fitrx.com/fitrx/default.asp?ref_franchise_id=127

NEWS:

EAS:

- FREE EAS "Together We Are Strong" T-Shirt with
  $150 EAS purchase  (while supplies last)!
- Betalean 120 caps for only $18.95 !  Myoplex 42 Packs $55.95 !
  Myoplex Deluxe 36 packs $57.95
- Betalean 2 x 120 Twinpacks only $34.95 !
  Myoplex Deluxe 2 x 36 Twinpacks only $113.95

- New flavors of Low Carb RTD (Dark Chocolate and Strawberry Banana)
- New and improved Cytovol HP in stock !
- Coming soon: New flavors of Myoplex Deluxe and Low Carb bars
- Coming soon: New Cytovol and Precision Protein liquid drinks

WHILE SUPPLIES LAST:

- FREE Met-Rx CD with $50 Met-Rx purchase
- FREE AST Shaker with $50 AST purchase

SPECIALS - Check www.fitrx.com for a complete list of specials:

AST - 19-NOR-3 Andro - 60 cap
Regular: $34.95      Sale: $32.95

AST - GL3 Glutamine - 1200 gm
Regular: $56.95      Sale: $51.95

AST - VP2 Twinpack - 2 x 2 LB - Any flavor
Regular: $55.95      Sale: $51.95

Bio-Test - Methoxy-7-with-7-Hydroxy-EC - 8 oz
Regular: $32.95      Sale: $28.95

Bio-Test - T2 Thermogenic Formula - 90 cap
Regular: $26.95      Sale: $22.95

Bio-Test - ZMA - 90 cap
Regular: $16.95      Sale: $14.95

EAS - Betalean - 120 cap
Regular: $23.95      Sale: $18.95

EAS - Betalean Twinpack - 2 x 120 cap
Regular: $46.95      Sale: $34.95

EAS - HMB - 360 cap
Regular: $49.95      Sale: $47.95

EAS - L-Glutamine Powder - 1000 gm
Regular: $49.95      Sale: $44.95

EAS - Methoxy Factor HP - 100 cap
Regular: $38.95      Sale: $36.95

EAS - Muscle Drive - 2 LB - Any flavor
Regular: $33.95      Sale: $31.95

EAS - Myoplex - 42 pack - Any flavor
Regular: $59.95      Sale: $55.95

EAS - Myoplex - 4 x 42 pack - Any flavor
Regular: $227.95      Sale: $219.80

EAS - Myoplex Deluxe - 36 pack - Any flavor
Regular: $61.95      Sale: $57.95

EAS - Myoplex Deluxe - 2 x 36 pack - Any flavor
Regular: $119.95      Sale: $113.95

EAS - Phosphagen HP - 4 LB - Any flavor
Regular: $29.95      Sale: $26.95

EAS - Synthevol 2 HP - 20 serve - Any flavor
Regular: $39.95      Sale: $36.95

MHP - TRAC - 400 gm
Regular: $37.95      Sale: $35.95

Muscletech - Cell-Tech - 4 LB - Any flavor
Regular: $40.95      Sale: $38.95

Muscletech - Nitrotech - 2 LB - Any flavor
Regular: $31.95      Sale: $28.95

Nature's Best - Isopure - 3 LB - Any flavor
Regular: $34.95      Sale: $32.95

Optimum Nutrition - Complete Diet Boost - 120 cap
Regular: $14.95       Sale: $13.95

Optimum Nutrition - Opti-Pro Meal - 20 pack - Any flavor
Regular: $27.95       Sale: $25.95

Optimum Nutrition - Opti-Pro Meal - 30 serve - Any flavor
Regular: $35.95       Sale: $33.95

Syntrax - Fuzu - 90 cap
Regular: $24.95       Sale: $22.95

Syntrax - Syntrabol 200 mg - 90 cap
Regular: $30.95       Sale: $28.95

To be removed from the FitRx.com specials email list, please click the
link below:
http://www.fitrx.com/fitrx/remove_email.asp?email=13818


Yes, please.  Let's look at the .com master before we do anything.  The Enron
Corp. master should be "easier".

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Stephanie Panus@ENRON
	02/26/2001 12:23 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: CSFB/Enron Corp.

FYI - I received a voice mail from Anita Khosla of CSFB (212-538-1938).  She
wants the Enron Corp. master to mirror the master they recently executed with
Enron Credit.com.  I have not had a chance to call her back yet.  Do you want
me to obtain a copy of the Enron Credit master?

Stephanie


Thanks - I've changed it. With deals like those, it's fine if you need to
change the counterparty name in the interest of time or efficiency. Could
just send me a quick e-mail, and copy Bill Williams III (real time manager),
when you change deals under the Short Term West Hourly desk? That way we can
both keep on top of common mistakes. And if it's at all possible for you to
wait on making those changes until you've e-mailed me, that would be great.
If I don't respond right away - if I'm out of the office or at lunch - then
feel free to change away!

Thanks,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
02/27/2001 11:04 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Deal No. 532726

Sorry, see 531726.

   Kate Symes                02/27/2001 12:50 PM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Deal No. 532726

I'm not finding anything in Enpower that matches that deal number. Is it
something else?

Rhonda L Denton
02/27/2001 10:43 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Monika Causholli/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Deal No. 532726

As you know, we do not have a contract with Transalta Energy Marketing Corp.
but with Transalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.  I am changing this deal to
that CP.

Let me know if you have any objections or if you prefer to make the change
yourself.  Do you want me to continue to let you know of these changes?  I
know Carla preferred to make the changes herself.


Please call Jake Thomas and Steve Thome in Portland and see if we can have a
conference call at 500 Houston time.  Thanks,

Kay


Hi there.  I'm new to the neighborhood, and I want to be involved.  I'm
interested in Citizen's Patrol so sign me up!  I'm not sure how much I'll be
able to do, due to my work schedule, but I'll do what I can.

Jennifer Stelly
305 W. Drew

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Jennifer L. Stelly

Good friends are like stars....you don't always
see them, but you know they are always there.

Don't frown, you never know who
is falling in love with your smile.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4.
No Minimums.
FREE Money 2002.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/BgmYkB/VovDAA/ySSFAA/NoOolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Please print on letterhead and fax to Treemont house to Eugene Vaughan.  Thanks.


John,

It's very interesting.

Thanks.

Vince

"John H Herbert" <jhh1@email.msn.com> on 08/03/2000 11:40:48 PM
To: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince_J_Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Since storage numbers are so important I decided to do the attached
fee article

Best regards,

JHHerbert

 - ts.pdf


Vasant,

Yes, it's perfect. Please, indicate that the wording was unfortunate.

Vince

Vasant Shanbhogue
03/08/2001 11:20 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Weekly report

Hi Vince,

 regarding David Port's response to Kevin Kindall's email, I feel that I
should respond, at least to make our position clear.  Please indicate if the
following response is appropriate -------

"Hi David,

  I understand that you were slightly upset over a comment Kevin Kindall made
in one of his weekly reports.  The intention was never to disparage anybody.
It is just that since Research gets data from a large number of sources, we
feel obligated to the data donor to ask any requester for clarification of
need.  I completely understand that RAC typically has access to much
sensitive information and they have a right to know much information.  We
just want to make sure there is open flow of information (it is in
everybody's best interests and the company's best interests) and that
everybody is aware of how data is flowing.

Best wishes,
 Vasant"

---------------------- Forwarded by Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001
11:11 AM ---------------------------
From: David Port/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/08/2001 08:46 AM
To: Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi
Zipter/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: RE: Weekly report

Kevin - thanks for the update.

On the Stock option Plans, if your angle is what I suspect, I suggest you get
with Rudi Zipter, who has done a great deal of work on this exposure,
including characterising and actually booking the short option positions in
Enron's equity system. We are already working with Ben Glisan's team firming
up a hedging program. We are well advanced in this effort so if you get with
my people it could save you a great deal of time.

Secondly, I am afraid I do take some exception to your references to Naveen's
team in your last point. Generally in RAC I don't believe we are obliged to
explain why we need information, except as a courtesy - otherwise that would
compromise our role somewhat. Specifically, I am aware of the sensitivity of
Raptor, just as I am of the sensitivity of all the information my group is
privvy to on a daily basis. Again, we have done a good deal of work on these
structures too (I see a position report daily). As I have discussed with
Vince, Naveen's request would have been derived from a discussion we all had
with Rick, concerning "meltdown" scenarios and their effect on, amongst other
things, funding vehicles.

But I would rather have had a conversation about this than see slightly
disparaging remarks about my people in email traffic.

Rgds
DP

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kindall, Kevin
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 8:19 AM
To: Kaminski, Vince; Shanbhogue, Vasant
Cc: Port, David
Subject: Weekly report

 << File: March 2, 2001 Report.doc >>


nothing is going on here.  i am actually going to grand cayman tomorrow for
the weekend.  it should be an ok weekend.  did you go out on saturday?  i was
hurting when i woke up sat morning.


I don't understand whta she is offering

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pickering, Mark
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Piper, Greg
Subject:	FW: IBM

Hi Louise,

Just got off the phone with Gail. She wants to know if they can help by coming up with a guaranteed offering from IBM that would help any NewCo succeed by providing IT support/direction, saving money, monetizing assets, retaining key staff and lending the IBM name, etc, etc to the deal.

If you're interested you can either call me or call her directly.

Regards

Mark Pickering
Chief Technology Officer

Enron Net Works, LLC

  _____

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Piper, Greg
Sent:	05 December 2001 08:23
To:	Pickering, Mark
Cc:	Leff, Dan; Beck, Sally; Rub, Jenny
Subject:	FW: IBM

Anything here?  I think that at one time prior to filing IBM was looking to buy or monetize or loan against all out hardware so we could get cash but I am not sure where that went.

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leff, Dan
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 8:09 AM
To:	Dayao, Anthony; Piper, Greg; Beck, Sally
Cc:	Stubblefield, Wade; Sharp, Vicki
Subject:	IBM

Anthony, Greg, Sally -

Gail Whipple from IBM called to offer any assistance that they can provide.

Potential to save money, monetize assets, provide people, provide assistance to employees & people that we don't / may not need, etc.

If we would like IBM to assist, we need to call her @ 914-642-6399.

Thanks - Dan


This is the way I show the Dayton Power exchange deal starting 1/21/2000,
please let me know if this is incorrect.

ENA delivered gas to Dayton's TGT citygate.  In return, Dayton is giving ENA
gas at various CGAS citygates.  There are no fees for this transaction.  The
TGT deal is 152766, the CGAS deal is 153213.  The volumes on these deals
should match.  Also, Dayton should not be using any ENA supply (pool gas or
ENA storage) to supply the CGAS citygate volume.

Comments/questions?

Victor, I did not put a meter number on the CGAS deal.

Also, it's time to introduce Steve Gillespie to Sitara.


Melba,

Please set up the Souther border, PG&E and Southern Border, Socal inices in
the database.  We have new risk coming in April that needs to find a market
soon on EOL.   We can have NGI send you the new index posting if you need
it.  Also, please acitvate long term index products of one year.  There is
also a PG&E topock phys product in the one month category for april that
needs to be activated.

I look forward to hearing from you Monday morning.

Sincerely,
Mike Grigsby


Brandee w/conf. 5-4013  11:15


Thank you for registering at Citibank Account Online. You now have
  free access, 24 hours a day, to your Citibank account information.
  Sign-on at https://www.accountonline.com/CB/Login.dcl to view your
  statements, monitor your unbilled activity and enroll in one of our
  electronic payment options.  While you're there, check out these
  great features:

      All-Electronic - Enroll today and make your paper statement a
      thing of the past. View it online instead. Then, pay your bill
      online with Click-to-Pay or AutoPay.

      Express Request - Manage your Citibank account information from
      your computer. Change your address, request a credit line
      increase, order a replacement card and more.

      Citibank Bill Manager - Receive and pay all of your bills online.

      Secure Messaging - Have a question? Use our secure message pad to
      correspond safely with our Customer Care Center.

      The Citibank Toolbar - Download this free software* and enjoy one
      click access to Account Online and other password protected
      websites. Plus, the Citibank Toolbar will fill online shopping
      forms with just one click!

  Once again, thanks for registering. We hope you visit Account Online
  at https://www.accountonline.com/CB/Login.dcl  again soon.

         * At point of download see Terms and Conditions governing use
           of software.

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  For your records, we have listed your User ID and email address
  below.

         User  ID:      colioquake
         Email Address: dfarmer@enron.com

  To learn about Citibank privacy, read our Privacy Promise at
  http://www.citibank.com/privacy/promise.htm

  This message is for information purposes only. Please do not reply to
  us at this email address--it is unattended, and we will not respond.
  Use the Secure Message Center in Help/Contact Us at Account Online.


FYI
Thanks
Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Meringolo, Peter
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 5:01 PM
> To: Fergus, Gary S.
> Subject: FW: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 9:59 AM
> To: Meringolo, Peter
> Subject: FW: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
> FYI.
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 2:57 PM
> To: 'hym@cpuc.ca.gov'
> Cc: 'MBD'
> Subject: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
> Harvey Morris Esq.
> California Public Utilities Commission
> 505 Public Utilities Commission
> San Francisco, California   94102
>
>  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
> ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. and Enron Energy Services
> Inc. (collectively referred to as "EES"), Enron Energy Marketing
> Corporation ("EEMC"), and Portland General Electric Corporation ("Portland
> General")(collectively sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")
>
> Harvey,
>
>  Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
> production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued
> by the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the
> Commission").  The Enron Entities are willing to assist the Commission in
> undertaking its investigation into the problems in the California electric
> markets by producing the information specified on a timely basis.  We
> believe that the production we propose will enable the Commission to
> commence its investigation much sooner than if the parties were forced to
> litigate all of the potential objections to the requests for production,
> which are, by any standard, extremely broad and could involve millions of
> pages of documents.  We make these proposals pursuant to our email
> exchange of October 3, 2000 with the understanding that the Commission
> agrees that by cooperating, offering to produce or producing documents,
> the Enron Entities have not waived any objections or challenges to these
> subpoenas whatsoever and that any claims, defenses, objections,
> jurisdictional or otherwise or other responses have been specifically
> reserved and can be raised in the future, if necessary.   For all of these
> proposals, we exclude documents that are protected from disclosure by the
> attorney client and attorney work product privileges.
>
>  Generally speaking, the Enron Entities propose to produce documents
> for year 2000 as noted below.  We also understand that the Commission will
> be obtaining documents from the ISO and PX and we will not attempt here to
> duplicate documents that we understand will be produced by those entities.
> As you will see in the general documents that are offered here for
> production, Enron Energy Services Operations, Inc. is the parent of Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. and does not have operating authority or engage in
> wholesale or retail purchases or sales of energy.  Thus, the documents
> offered here with respect to those two entities originates with Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. but we have designated them both as EES.  We also do
> not propose to offer duplicative documents as between the Enron Entities.
>
> GENERAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 1 through 4
>
>  Because of the dynamic nature of the Enron Entities' businesses, the
> burden and expense on them to locate, and produce every corporate
> organizational chart anywhere in their organizations since April 1, 1998
> is significant.   The Enron Entities will provide the Commission with
> exemplars of their current organizational charts, telephone directories
> and so called "family trees" to show its current organization.  To the
> extent that the Enron Entities can readily identify and locate exemplars
> of significant organizational charts, telephone directories or so called
> "family trees" for earlier periods they will also make those available.
> One Enron Entity, Portland General, has published books on its corporate
> history.  If a list of those books would be helpful, we can provide it.
> With respect to the other Enron Entities, to the extent that corporate
> histories can be found, they will be produced.  We anticipate producing
> these documents in the first wave on October 13, 2000.
>
> Requests 5 and 6
>
>  The Enron Entities propose that their responses to Requests 1-4 will
> identify their relationship to affiliated companies and the Transaction
> Documents will identify its customers and suppliers.  We believe this
> information will be sufficient to illustrate these relationships for the
> staff's purposes.
>
> FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 7 through 11
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce their public filings for the period
> requested with respect to financial data.  EPMI, EES, and Portland General
> will provide to the Commission electronic transaction data ( the
> "Transaction Documents") for the purchase and sale of energy delivered
> which information includes economic data.   We anticipate producing public
> filings regarding financial data on October 13, 2000 and the electronic
> Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> GENERATING DOCUMENTS
> Requests 12, 14 and 18
>
>  For the Enron Entities other than Portland General, the generation
> facilities are either non-existent or limited in number and there will
> probably be limited documents available.  The Enron Entities to the extent
> they act as a scheduling coordinator or possessed the right to use or
> resell generation output, do not have the specific documents that pertain
> to each generation unit requested.  The Enron Entities, other than
> Portland General, do have documents and information for Las Vegas
> Cogeneration.  We propose to produce these documents in the second wave of
> document productions.
>
>   For Portland General, the production of the requested documents
> would involve a tremendous volume of documents, as Portland General owned
> twenty generating facilities of a variety of types and sizes during 2000.
> Portland General is a net importer of energy and can only generate about
> one half of its total energy demand.  As a result, we question whether the
> effort required of Portland General is warranted as its impact on the
> California wholesale market is necessarily limited.  Nevertheless,
> Portland General proposes to provide for year 2000 electronic Transaction
> Documents in summary form similar to the data being provided by other
> Enron Entities, to the extent relevant as discussed below.  We propose
> that the Commission defer requesting production of other information until
> it has reviewed the information of generators who sell a significant
> proportion of their energy into the California market.  At that time a
> more accurate assessment can be made of whether this enormous effort will
> be valuable given the limited impact of Portland General generation on the
> California wholesale market.
>
> TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
> Requests 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19
>
>  We understand that the Commission will be obtaining trading data for
> the purchase and sale of energy delivered in California from the ISO and
> PX.  EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of relevant
> transaction data for year 2000 (in California and outside of California
> and Real Time) for the purchase and sale of energy delivered with the
> date, counterparty, quantity, delivery point, hours, price, and whether it
> is a purchase or a sale.   Because of the speed with which you want this
> information, it is possible that some entries will be incomplete or
> inaccurate.  For those
> transactions where EPMI served only as the scheduling coordinator, we
> understand that the ISO will show part of the transaction, but there will
> not be a corresponding transaction in the EPMI data we can provide
> quickly.  The reason is that this type of transaction is passed through to
> EPMI's customer on an accounting system rather than as part of the trading
> business.  EES can also provide similar data with respect to relevant
> wholesale and retail transactions with the proviso that with respect to
> retail transactions it will not include the specific names of its retail
> customers but instead will provide a blind customer number due to EES'
> confidentiality obligations to those customers.  We anticipate producing
> the Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> FERC DOCUMENTS
>
> Request 20
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce the requests for data they received
> from FERC and to the extent that FERC has been given responses, copies of
> those responses.  We anticipate producing the FERC documents on October
> 13, 2000.
>
>
>  Based upon discussions that we have had with the various Enron
> Entities, we believe that we could make a second wave of productions on
> Friday October 27, 2000.  It is possible that not all Enron Entities could
> make that date but we believe the bulk of the data could be available for
> production by then.
>
>  We propose to make these productions with the understanding that if
> any entity obtains a more stringent protective order than the one
> currently in place, that all of the Enron Entities document productions
> will be protected by the most stringent protective order.  In addition,
> if, at the request of any party or nonparty to this proceeding, the
> Commission or a court of competent jurisdiction orders that the requests
> for production be limited, reduced or eliminated, the Enron Entities
> reserve the right to limit the production of documents in conformance with
> such order.
>
>  We understand that you will consider these proposals and let us know
> if they are acceptable to the Commission.  If you have any questions or
> comments about our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Day
> or myself.
>
> Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP
>
> Gary Fergus
>
>
>
>
>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


VERIFIABLE ERCOT MARKET PARTICIPANTS

ERCOT is considering setting up a special e-mail
"exploder" address list to use as supplemental
notification to registered participants in the
ERCOT market when Special Operating Condititons,
Advisories, Alerts and Emergency Operations
Procedures are implemented and posted on the SAMIS
(OASIS).

If you are a verifiable participant in the ERCOT
market and would like to be included in this list,
please notify John Tolbert Smith
(jsmith@ercot.com) by November 24, 2000.  It is
important that we have an address that will likely
be stable and not often changed.

To assist us in processing your reply you must set
the subject of your responce to "MARKET EMAIL" to
be included in this list.


Hello your shipment went out today via UPS for tomorrow delivery

Thanks

Subject: Order 725 from catalog luxuryguru

> Date         Thu Aug 16 11:51:14 EDT 2001
> Ship to      danny mccarty
>              3 S. Watertree Drive
>              Woodlands TX 77380
>              US United States
>              713-345-3271
> Bill to      Same
> E-Mail       dmccarty@enron.com (emailed)
> Via          2nd Day Air
> Payment      American Express
> Referrer     Excite search with unknown query terms
> Entry point  http://store.yahoo.com/classifieds/adin73pitpen.html
>
>
> Name
Code       Qty     Each  Options
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------
> Rolex Submariner black dial all stainelss steel case and bracelet NEW!
None         1  2875.00
>
Subtotal  2875.00
>
Shipping    30.00
>
Tax     0.00
>
Total  2905.00
>
>
>
>
> You can view your orders at http://store.yahoo.com
>


Forwarded from Halliburton:

Subject: Report from WTO - Part IV

INSIDE (AND OUTSIDE) THE WTO

INSIDE

 Renato Ruggiero, former Director General of the World Trade
Organization (WTO) spoke at a dinner for members of the Coalition for
Service Industries on Wednesday evening.  His remarks were some of the best
made during the WTO Seattle Round but were off the record and will probably
not appear in print.  Among his observations were:

* 1.7 billion people residing in 30 countries are trying to get into
the WTO at this time.  The WTO is regarded by many as the organization
needed to deal with the globalization in which all nations now find
themselves.
* Labor and environmental issues already have forums in which to have
their issues heard.  Their problem is that nothing works as well as the WTO.
That they want to move their issues into the WTO area is not only
understandable, it is flattering.
* (Concerning the demonstrations) "As long as reason rules over
emotions in this world, the WTO will prevail.  The demonstrator's goals may
be right.  I don't know.  But, their aim is wrong.  The WTO should not be
their target."
* The demonstrators have had the effect of making ministers even more
determined to finish their work.

The Seattle Round has had an interesting ancillary result.  Environmental
groups previously in disagreement or acting independently, have taken the
occasion of the WTO meeting to unify.  Greenpeace, The Sierra Club, Friends
of the Earth, The National Wildlife Federation, and The World Wildlife Fund
have been meeting before and during the Seattle Round.  Their goal is to put
a sharp focus on what they want from the WTO.  As of this writing, it is not
clear if they wish to put the WTO out of business or get their issues made
part of the negotiations but the latter is more likely.  What ever they
decide, the coalition of these environmentalists will be much more likely to
be heard in the future.

Prior to the President's arrival, agriculture and other difficult issues
were making significant headway towards resolving differences.  The
President arrived in Seattle on Wednesday amongst hopes that his visit would
have a positive effect on negotiations - but the opposite occurred.  His
ability to communicate was put to good use as he spoke to all facets of the
WTO to include the demonstrators and, until he granted an interview with the
Financial Times, the best possible face was being put on WTO negotiations.
The Times article was published on Thursday, however, and it upset everyone.
In the interview, President Clinton stated that core standards on labor
should be adopted by the WTO and included in all trade agreements.  If they
were not followed, they should be enforced with sanctions.  Until these
remarks, the administration had maintained that only a working group on
labor should be established with the mission of analyzing links between
trade and labor.  The idea of a working group was gaining steam until the
interview was published.  The United States Trade Representative was rumored
to be very upset and the President's remarks met with almost universal
condemnation.  Delegates from Japan and the European Union made strong
statements of disagreement as did most of the developing nations.  Many see
the use of sanctions as the antithesis of the WTO's mission.  There was
speculation that the remarks were made to assist Vice President Gore with
labor in his bid for the White House and that the President did not really
believe they would have any effect within the WTO.  They did - and the
effect was all negative.

President Clinton made the rounds of a number of parties that evening to
include one hosted for the members of congress who had worked on the African
Trade bill.  At one time, prior to the President's arrival, there were 30
members of Congress on the stage with Representative Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.)
and it was the broadest possible array of political beliefs.  Individuals
representing the most liberal side of the Democrat party stood side by side
with individuals from the most conservative side of the Republican party,
all waiting for the President.  When he didn't appear, the congressional
representatives left the stage and mingled with about 100 guests.  It was a
lobbyist's dream!  For 45 minutes, they talked, joked and lobbied while they
waited for the President.  He arrived, made a predictable speech and left
the stage only to find that, for security reasons, he would have to remain
in the room awhile longer.  It turned out to be one of the most festive
events of the week.

OUTSIDE

 498 people were arrested as of Thursday morning.  Delegates from
many countries were surprised that the arrests were so long in coming and
expressed significant displeasure with the turmoil in the streets.  Third
world countries have been the most critical.  Their concerns focus on
improving their economies   They need infrastructure and financing before
they can worry about the plight of sea turtles in oceans that don't even
boarder their countries.  Many of them do not disagree with America's basic
goals but they believe that rich countries ideals are standing in the way of
third world countries progress.

 As days of disturbance continue, the humor of the demonstrations is
diminishing.  What is left are hard core anarchists bent simply on
destruction.  The positive side of all this is that the goodness of people
in Seattle is now beginning to show itself.  King Country Councilman Brian
Derdowski took to the streets Tuesday evening, surveying the damage and
trying to mollify the crowds.  He saw a man grab a sack of coffee at a
vandalized Starbucks and he approached him.  Derdowski told the would-be
looter he really shouldn't take the bag of beans and the man dropped the
bag, hugged the Councilman and then walked away from the riots.

 Nancy Woodland and her husband, both Seattle attorneys, saw the
violence on television on Tuesday.  By Wednesday afternoon, they were in the
heart of town with Windex, Comet, SOS and elbow grease.  They spent most of
the day cleaning the storefronts of other peoples businesses.

 Terry Webb who owns a greeting card store, has seen his business
drop by 90%.  When interviewed by a local newspaper, he simply smiled and
reached for one of his cards.  He handed the reporter a card that read,
"Tough times are like speed bumps.  They only slow you down for a little."

 This will be my last report from Seattle.
       Don

DAVE GRIBBIN
Vice President
Office of Government Affairs
Halliburton Company
1150 18th Street, N.W., Suite 200
Washington, D. C. 20036
(202) 223-0820


Kelly M. Johnson
Executive Assistant
Enron Corp.
Tel: 713-853-6485
Fax: 713-853-2534
E-Mail: kelly.johnson@enron.com


John, can you arrange this call?  Blanca can help make the arrangements.


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Rosalee T. Fleming
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Rosalee T. Fleming
Report Total: $2,592.53
Amount Due Employee: $2,592.53

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


I refer to the conference call which is to be held on Friday 18 February
(Sydney time).

Following are the details of the AT&T conference call for your attention:

Host name:                     Nicholas O'Day

Confirmation Number: 502281

Conference time:           Houston - 17 February - 14:00
                                            London   - 17 February - 20:00
                                            Tokyo     - 18 February - 05:00
                                             Poland   - 17 February - 21:00
                                            Chile        - 17 February - 16:00

Calling from USA = 1800 230 1074
Outside USA         = Dial AT&T access number then    1 612 332 1025

AT&T access numbers:         London =0800-89-0011
                                                        Japan   = 005-39-111
                                                        Poland = 008 00 111
111
                                                        Chile     = 800 225
288

For those who will not be in any of the above countries at the time of the
call I have attached the "AT&T Number Finder" so that you can look up the
required AT&T number.

To install this application double click on the icon and follow the
instructions on your screen.

Hopefully I will get an agenda to you some time today.  Please let me know if
you have any queries.  If you will not be able to participate in the
conference call please let me know.

Regards

Shari Wicks
Secretary to Nick O'Day


ISO Market Participants:

  Final invoices for November 2000 were sent to market
participants by the ISO on  February 14, 2001. Cash clearing is scheduled
for February 22, 2001.

  We are reviewing our current procedures, and will advise
parties by 1pm on Wednesday February 21 of any changes to be implemented
with the scheduled February 22, 2001 cash clearing.

  Phil Leiber
  Dir. Financial Planning & Treasurer
  California ISO
  916 351-2168
  916-351-2259 (fax)


Huh??  I'm confused.

Gabriel Monroy
11/16/2000 10:45 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Shreveport

Hey hey,  I am here almost submitting a bid for this company and I am not
complaining.

Gabriel


Attached please find Southwest Gas Corporation's Motion for Late-Filed Reply
Brief and its Reply Brief in the Gas Restructuring Investigation.

If any party would like hard copy by expedited overnite service, please
contact Keith Brown at 702.876.7157 or by reply email.

 - SWGMotion.wpd
 - SWGReplyBrief.wpd


Hey David,

Please give me a call.

713-345-8960

Thanks,
Robin


Start Date: 2/6/02; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020617.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked by user 'admin' on machine 'NAHOU-TRDTS4'.
Table

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstNW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/6/02
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: ENRJ_CISO_3000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


I made a few changes.  Please use this version.  Janie, if you are satisfied as it is, please run it by Mike, Barry and Stephanie.  I didn't realize it was due tomorrow until this afternoon (I was operating under the assumption that it was due 10/25 - don't know why!).  I'm not sure we can file it electronically, so it may have to be e-mailed to the D.C. office.  If so, we would need the final copy by 2:00.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:14 PM
To:	Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	draft reply comments in El Paso

Here is the draft.

 << File: RP00-336-002 ConfReply Drft.doc >>


Please see the attached memo from INGAA regarding a meeting they and Joe
Hartsoe had with Dan Larcamp as a follow up to the meeting Rick, Linda and I
had with Dan Larcamp a couple of weeks ago.  INGAA asks that we not circulate
the memo widely.

We need to discuss what, if any, response ENA needs to make.  Donna and I
have been talking about this and we will set up a conference call with the
gas group to discuss further.  Please let us know if you have any questions
or comments.

Sarah

----- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 07/06/2001 04:34 PM -----

	Joan Dreskin <jdreskin@INGAA.org>
	07/06/2001 01:48 PM

		 To: "Joe Hartsoe (E-mail)" <joe.hartsoe@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Final Memo

 - july 5 MEMORANDUM to hartsoe1.doc


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN"    "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd">

<TITLE>NYTimes HTML E-Mail</TITLE>

<FORM method="GET" action="http://query.nytimes.com/search/query">

Search NYTimes.com
<INPUT TYPE="text" SIZE="15"  name="query" MAXLENGTH="32">
<select name="date">
<option value="Today">Today's News <option value="site1week">Past Week <option value="past30days" selected="">Past 30 Days <option value="past90days">Past 90 Days <option value="past365days">Past Year <option value="Full">Since 1996 </select>
<input type="image" name="submit" value=" Search" src="http://graphics.nytimes.com/images/global/global_search/gs_submit.gif" width="18" height="19" border="0" alt="submit" align="top">

</FORM>

February 28, 2002

QUOTE OF THE DAY

"It seems that he doesn't want to forget 1982."

YASIR ARAFAT,referring to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Israel's
invasion of Lebanon.

NATIONAL

How Sept. 11 Changed Goals of Justice Dept.

Prior to Sept. 11, counterterrorism programs did not lead Attorney General John Ashcroft's list of priorities.

Cremation Case Calls for Creative Prosecution

With no laws against desecrating corpses in Georgia, prosecutors are accumulating small charges against the operator of a crematory there.

Body Is Found and Thought to Be That of Girl, 7

Searchers looking for signs of a 7-year-old child who has been missing for almost a month found the partly burned body of a girl.

MORE NATIONAL NEWS

50% Off New York Times Home Delivery

Enjoy the award winning journalism of The New
York Times with the added benefit of convenient
home delivery.  Now you have another chance to
get 50% off for the first 8 weeks.  Pay by credit
card and you'll also receive 4 additional weeks at
this low introductory rate.  That's 12 weeks in
all!  Subscribe today!

INTERNATIONAL

Arafat Says Saudi Plan Needs U.S. Backing

Calling it "very strong," Yasir Arafat said on Wednesday that a Saudi Arabian peace proposal's chances for success depended on immediate American support.

In Caucasus Gorge, a Haven for Muslim Militants

The fight against global terrorism may be headed to the snow-encrusted escarpments northeast of Georgia's capital, Tbilisi.

Radio Transmitter to Oppose Hussein Wins U.S. Backing

The State Department's decision to begin broadcasts to encourage opposition to Saddam Hussein represents a new degree of support for the Iraqi National Congress.

MORE INTERNATIONAL NEWS

BUSINESS

Wall Street Analysts Faulted on Enron

Lawmakers investigating Enron's collapse criticized financial analysts for continuing to urge investors to buy stock even as the company headed toward bankruptcy.

Volcker Names 2 to Join Panel That Will Oversee Andersen Board

Paul A. Volcker, head of the oversight panel charged with overhauling Arthur Andersen, announced that Charles A. Bowsher and P. Roy Vagelos would serve alongside him on the board.

Contract Offers Look at How Global Played Influence Game

The Pentagon relaxed the security requirements for a planned network in a way that allowed Global Crossing to remain in the bidding for the lucrative contract.

MORE BUSINESS NEWS

TECHNOLOGY

That P in PC Now Stands for Picture

These days, all you need is a good piece of software to organize, find, print, send and otherwise manipulate your pictures. And both Apple and Microsoft are counting on your desire to do so.

Broadband Bill Advances, but Its Survival Is Doubtful

The House overwhelmingly approved a measure on Wednesday to allow the nation's largest telephone companies to expand into the high-speed Internet market.

A Long Time Ago, in a Lab Far Away . . .

Spacewar, the world's first video game, was an early hint that a powerful new entertainment medium was on the horizon, one that would ultimately bond Silicon Valley to Hollywood.

MORE TECHNOLOGY NEWS

POLITICS

Near Success, Election System Overhaul Stalls

Election overhaul legislation stalled in the Senate in a dispute over how to curb fraud at the polls without disenfranchising voters.

Judge Orders Release of Energy Panel's Files

A federal judge has ordered the Energy Department to release thousands of documents related to Vice President Dick Cheney's national energy task force.

Powell Says U.S. Will Grab Chances at Mideast Peace

The secretary of state said on Wednesday that the Bush administration was prepared to pursue aggressively several new openings for peace in the Middle East.

MORE POLITICS NEWS

SPORTS

Postseason on the Line, St. John's Is a Winner

With a win over Notre Dame, St. Johns may have ensured an invitation to the N.C.A.A. tournament by adding to its list of  big victories over Wake Forest and Miami.

No Comeback This Time for the Nets

Ending New Jersey's six-game winning streak and gaining some revenge for losing their huge lead to the Nets on Sunday, the Hornets cruised to a victory at Charlotte Coliseum.

Madden Seems Close to Deal With 'M.N.F.'

John Madden is close to signing a deal with ABC's "Monday Night Football,"   three sports broadcasting industry executives said on Wednesday.

MORE SPORTS NEWS

ARTS

Big Winners at the Grammys: Alicia Keys, U2 and 'O Brother'

At the 44th Grammy Awards, Alicia Keys won five honors, U2 took four and the soundtrack to  "O Brother Where Art Thou" was a surprise winner of album of the year and four other awards.

An Upstart Auctioneer Digs In

Can Phillips, de Pury & Luxembourg, under its newly structured ownership, survive in the costly and competitive world of auction   houses?

No Escape for Swells on a Gritty Boulevard

The Paul Taylor Dance Company returned to City Center on Tuesday with two recent pieces, "Black Tuesday" and "Piazzolla Caldera," as well as the 1962 "Aureole."

MORE ARTS NEWS

NY REGION

To City's Burden, Add 11,000 Tons of Daily Trash

A $6 billion plan to rid New York of its mountain of garbage, which started in the Giuliani administration, is stalled and may unravel.

Interim Road to Reconnect Battery Tunnel

The city and state governments announced that construction would begin immediately on a temporary six-lane road leading to the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel.

Records Show Wide Variety in Lifestyles of Assessors

The men accused of supplementing their salaries with bribes to lower property assessments used the money in diverse ways.

MORE NY REGION NEWS

OP-ED

Return of the Clintonites

By WILLIAM SAFIRE

Plenty of Clinton alumni are running for office. Will the Clinton connection be a political plus or the mark of Cain?

To Rebuild Afghanistan, Look Next Door

By OLGA M. DAVIDSON and MOHAMMAD J. MAHALLATI

Iran, with a ready work force and strong ties to the Afghan people, is one of the best hopes for building a prosperous Afghanistan.

The Angry Voice of a City Left Behind

By MARK C. PEYKO

Despite being indicted for bribery, Rep. James A. Traficant Jr. remains popular with many of his constituents, and his appeal is understandable.

MORE OP-ED  NEWS

About This E-Mail

You received these headlines because you requested The New York Times
Direct e-mail service. To sign up for other newsletters, cancel delivery,
change delivery options or your e-mail address, see
http://www.nytimes.com/email.
Check or un-check the headlines you would like to receive or cancel and
remember to go to the bottom of the page and click on "Save
Selections."  Suggestions and feedback are welcome at
feedback@nytimes.com.

Please include the following ID number when writing to
feedback@nytimes.com
so that we can track any reports of problems: 577749

How to Advertise

For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or other advertising
opportunities with NYTimes.com, contact onlinesales@nytimes.com or
visit our online media kit.

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
04:45 PM ---------------------------

"hollyw" <hollyw@email.msn.com> on 11/13/2000 03:57:44 PM
To: "Sheri Thomas" <Sheri.Thomas@enron.com>, "Rick Couvillon"
<julierickcouv@hotmail.com>, "Raymond Paterson" <ray_paterson@hotmail.com>,
"Randy Howes" <rhowes@manistee-isd.k12.mi.us>, "Nicol, Gary" <nicolg@bp.com>,
"Matt Frazier" <fraz2girls@ev1.net>, "Len" <bigusdickus70@hotmail.com>,
"KRISTI GIRON" <KRISTI.GIRON@cfisd.net>, "John Schmitz" <jschm@telxon.com>,
"Jim Miller" <jraggie1@pdq.net>, "Diego Gotthelf" <dygotthelf@hotmail.com>,
"Debbie Hall" <gmind@icsi.net>, "Darron C Giron" <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>,
"Ben & Phyllis Tobias" <benandphyllistobias@compuserve.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Newspaper Articles -- Not About the Election!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Warren, Stacy" <swarre02@coair.com>
To: "Getteau, Liz" <lgette@coair.com>; "Allison O'Donnell (E-mail)"
<allison530@earthlink.net>; "Bryan Kile (E-mail)" <bkile@orbitworld.net>;
"Drew Berkman (E-mail)" <DBerkman@worldnet.att.net>; "Greg Holles (E-mail)"
<GregHolles@aol.com>; "Jim Henness (E-mail)" <jhennes@c2i2.com>; "Jim
McClatchie (E-mail)" <jimmac@flash.net>; "Jon Warren (E-mail)"
<jhwarren@ruf.rice.edu>; "Mom&Dad(Lake) (E-mail)" <rjones@mcia.com>; "Rella
Snetsinger (E-mail)" <rella13@zebra.net>; "Robert Kile (E-mail)"
<rkile@aol.com>; "Rochelle Smith (E-mail)" <rochelle@waterengineers.com>;
"Roland Schilder (E-mail)" <Schilder_r@hotmail.com>; "Ron Jones(Work)
(E-mail)" <jonesr@tpi-sourcing.com>; "Ruth Harper (E-mail)"
<harperbuell@earthlink.net>; "Trey Bergman (E-mail)" <treybergman@ghg.net>;
"Ugly Boo (E-mail)" <hollyw@email.msn.com>
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 3:35 PM
Subject: FW: Newspaper Articles -- Not About the Election!

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wanda Harding [mailto:wharding@redsky.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 1:53 PM
> To: Alan Birchenough (E-mail); Alisa Mayfield Conboy (E-mail); Barry
> Harding (E-mail); Brian Mann (E-mail); Donald Pitschel (E-mail); Hazel
> Birchenough (E-mail); Heather Sullivan (E-mail); Ignacio Martinez
> (E-mail); Jeff Draper (E-mail); Jennifer Vodvarka (E-mail); Jim Terando
> (E-mail); Lori Stull (E-mail); Pegi Newhouse (E-mail); Rick Pleczko
> (E-mail); Warren, Stacy; Wes Manning (E-mail); Prentiss Jones; Tom
> Gibson; Alan Alagappan
> Subject: FW: Newspaper articles -- Not about the election!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

 - i120.gif
 - i146.gif
 - i133.gif
 - i131.gif
 - i129.gif
 - i126.gif
 - i125.gif
 - i151.gif


Since it will not be possible to reach Ken Lay before tomorrow, Jim advises
that the actions will not be taken before Monday morning India time.  In the
interim, your approval and comments on the attached draft statement/Q&As
would be appreciated.  I will be out of town until mid-afternoon Sunday, but
checking e-mails and can be reached on my cellular phone (281-948-7273).

Thanks,

John


Kern Gets Speedy OK; Breathitt Questions Action
FERC moved with record speed to issue a certificate last week to Kern River
Gas Transmission for its 135 MMcf/d, mostly compression, expansion to the
natural gas-starved California market, but not all of the commissioners were
happy with the expedited manner in which the project was approved.
"The speed with which the Commission has acted in this proceeding is
something which will no doubt be touted as a great effort," but the
"precedent we have created could be a double-edged sword," warned
Commissioner Linda Breathitt in a partial dissent of the decision. Although
she voted in favor of the certificate in the end, she questioned whether FERC
"should...be willing to sacrifice careful review for speedy action."
Breathitt further said she seriously doubted the so-called California Action
expansion of the 900-mile,Wyoming-to-California Kern River system merited the
"extraordinary regulatory treatment" that the Commission gave it. Critics
claim that the $81 million project will not flow any more gas to the Wheeler
Ridge Interconnection in California than is currently available there, she
noted, adding that it would simply displace existing gas.
"...[I]t will not necessarily result in any net increase of natural gas in
the California marketplace. This makes it difficult to understand just how
our approval of Kern River's proposal is going to assist in increasing
electric generation in California this summer," Breathitt said. If anything,
she noted the project could make the congestion problem at Wheeler Ridge even
worse than it is.
There should have been a "fuller airing of this issue" at FERC before the
project was certificated, she noted. "It would be counterproductive for this
Commission to act precipitously on projects related to California without
ensuring that they will, in reality, benefit specific markets --- and more
importantly, that they will cause no further harm."
The Commission majority, however, readily dismissed protests of Pacific Gas
and Electric (PG&E), Southern California Gas and other California customers,
that claim the Kern River expansion would degrade service to existing
customers. They requested that existing customers be given priority over
expansion shippers.
"We conclude that the California Action Project will not have undue negative
impacts on existing shippers or competing pripelines," the order said
[CP01-106. For starters, "the record does not show that pro-rata allocations
of primary firm capacity have been a problem at Wheeler Ridge." Kern River
reports that the aggregate primary firm delivery rights of its shippers at
Wheeler Ridge will increase to about 527 MMcf/d from 450 MMcf/d as a result
of this project. At the same time, the design delivery capacity at the
Wheeler Ridge Meter Station will be increased to about 800 MMcf/d from 598
MMcf/d to accommodate existing shippers, new expansion shippers and Mojave
Pipeline shippers, it noted.
"Therefore, the expanded delivery point capacity at Wheeler Ridge will be
greater than the sum of the combined Kern River and Mojave contract volumes.
The Commission recognizes that this does not factor in the volumes
attributable to both PG&E and local production that are also delivered to
Wheeler Ridge. However, our emphasis is on Kern River being able to provide
sufficient delivery point capacity for its customers," the order said.
"The solution to the problem of pro-rata allocations of any services at
Wheeler Ridge lies not with the interstate pipelines, but rather in fixing
the problem with the take-away capacity and the lack of firm transportation
path rights on SoCalGas, a matter which is beyond our jurisdiction."
The project would increase the "limited-term, incremental transportation
capacity" of Kern River by 135 MMcf/d from Wyoming to California to help
address the urgent need for additional gas in the West. An estimated 53,900
horsepower would be added to the pipeline, including three new compressor
stations, and upgraded facilities at three existing compressor stations and
an existing meter station. The project, which has been fully subscribed, has
a targeted in-service date of July 1 of this year.
Kern River plans to use a mix of permanent and temporary facilities on the
project, with the temporary facilities intended to be subsequently replaced
by permanent 2002 California Expansion Project facilities (which is pending
at FERC), and the permanent facilities to be incorporated into the design of
the pipeline's 2002 and 2003 California Expansion Projects. The 2003 project
recently went through an open season


1400 smith st.
houston, tx 77002-7361


Jan Moore
Enron Transportation Services
713-345-3858
jan.moore@enron.com


We are concerned about leaks to the press which may have ocurred from our
Washington office over the last few months (including leaks from a former
employee).  Could you put someone in touch with Rick and Linda Robertson
(head of our DC office)?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/04/2001
03:33 PM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
05/02/2001 08:03 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Security

Should I also talk to Brindell about possible inside leak?  anything else I
need to do relative to security ?


Were any of you missing in action Monday through Wednesday (6/19-21) when I
was gone?

tm :)


Western Government Affairs --

Here is the outline of the Upcoming Issues by Forum we put together recently
in DC.  We need to make sure that we have everything on this list (or add as
appropriate).  Of course, this list will continue to evolve - I added the Cal
ISO request to buy "forward" on the list.

Gavin Dillingham has agreed to maintain a calendar that will track all of
these Issues and Important Dates.  Our goal is to have a calendar program
that everyone can access to keep on top of what is going on related to
California and the West.

Please let me know if you have any thoughts on this.

Jim


Richard -

Excellent summary.  thanks.
RH

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ring, Richard
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:08 PM
To:	Herndon, Rogers
Subject:

Rogers,

Enron Energy Services, Inc. ("EESI") submitted application to become a NEPOOL member, to be effective January 1, 2000.  EESI was approved by the NEPOOL Participants Membership Subcommittee at its January 24, 2000 meeting.  One requirement of NEPOOL membership is to satisfy the Financial Assurance Policy for NEPOOL Members.  EESI, Enron Energy Marketing Corp, and Enron Power Marketing, Inc. are all members of NEPOOL and have chosen to satisfy the Financial Assurance Policy by issuance of Performance Bond(s), rather than corporate guaranty, due to Enron's disagreement with the Form of Corporate Guaranty required by NEPOOL.

EESI, via Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, issued a Performance Bond in the amount of $8,000,000 in June 2000; the Performance Bond was reissued in June 2001 in the amount of $8,000,000.  EESI received a letter from ISO New England dated October 10, 2001, addressed to Becky Pitre (EESI Settlements) and received by Becky probably October 12, 2001, indicating that EESI's current Performance Bond was insufficient and that EESI needed to increase the amount to $11,703,018.75 to cover EESI's current activity level.  Becky delivered the October 10th letter  to my attention whereby I took the letter to EESI Legal Department (Karen Cordova) and informed Karen that EESI needed to increase the Performance Bond to $20,000,000.  Karen requested Credit Department (Nichole Gunter) initiate an increase in the Performance Bond to the $20,000,000 level; to the best of my knowledge the initial conversation with Credit Department was October 12, 2001.  In telephone conversations with ISO-NE, Enron's Credit Department personnel were informed by ISO-NE that in order to avoid Financial Assurance Default the matter needed to be resolved within ten (10) days of the date of the October 10, 2001 letter (October 19, 2001), however the letter did not indicate such.

I was notified by Credit Department on October 16, 2001 that the bond company Enron utilizes for performance bond(s) would not process our Performance Bond request for increase until Enron paid the bond company for outstanding invoices for "other" performance bonds (bond  renewals), approximately $150,000.  The "other" performance bond invioces had been bounced around EESI, since June 2001, to various individuals (i.e. Greg Sharp, Mark Mueller, Jeff Golden, Scott Mills) and had still remained unpaid.  Payments for the "other" performance bonds were made and the bond company processed our request for increase in the EESI NEPOOL Performance Bond to $20,000,000, which was issued by the bond company on October 23, 2001, executed by EESI on October 23, 2001 and forwarded via FAX and Overnight Mail to ISO-NE on October 23, 2001.  EESI was unable to comply with the October 19, 2001 deadline to resolve the Financial Assurance Default due to complications with the bond company as mentioned above.  Credit Department personnel informed ISO-NE personnel that EESI would not meet the October 19, 2001 deadline, but was working diligently to resolve the matter; Credit Department personnel sent via FAX, a copy of the request to the bond company for revisions to the Performance Bond to ISO-NE personnel on October 19, 2001.

I notified Dan Allegretti, (Enron Government Affairs & Chariman, NEPOOL Participants Committee) of the entire situation prior to October 19, 2001.  Dan indicated that he did not think there would be any problems, but to get the matter resolved as quickly as possible. Dan advised me that the implications of the Financial Assurance Default would result in communications to the Membership Subcommittee and that when the next letter was published, the following month, EESI would no longer be listed as being in default.  On October 19, 2001 another letter was sent to Becky Pitre (EESI Settlements) from Edward McKenna, Vice President & Chief Financial Officer informing EESI that "Enron Energy Services, Inc. has not maintained the required level of financial assurance for 10 days or more, and has had a total combination of 3 financial assurance and/or payment defaults in the last 12 months, which qualifies them as having 2 (two) Level 1 defaults.  The ISO has been in contact with Enron Energy Services, Inc. through multiple telephone communications, and to date the financial assuvance default has not been cured.  Therefore, per the established procedure, we are forwarding this information to the NEPOOL Membership Subcommittee for action by them."  According to Dan Allegretti the Memberhsip Subcommittee reports to him, as Chariman of the Members Subcommittee, and he would discuss the issue with them.  The previous two Financial Assurance Defaults mentioned the October 19, 2001 letter occurred (i) December 2000, when payment was received 1-2 days late and was automatically resolved when payment was received and (ii) September 2001, when Financial Assurance Default occurred and was resolved through market activity.  To the best of my knowledge, EESI was unaware of either the December 2000 Payment Default or the September 2001 Financial Assurance Default, and no information was received by EESI from ISO-NE relative to either incidence.

According to (i) Protocal for the Initation of Membership Termination Proceedings and (ii) conversations with Dan Allegretti, the issue should be resolved with the receipt on October 24, 2001 of the Performance Bond by ISO-NE.  I have also advised the ISO-NE, in the future, to send communications to EESI's Credit Department and not EESI's Settlements.  Also, Dan Allegretti is investigating the facts leading the the October 19, 2001 letter with representatives from ISO-NE.

I left message for Molly Harris as you requested. I was able to speak to Denise Furey and Nichole Gunter, who both indicated that they would speak with Molly as they all work together.

Let me know if you need any additional information.

Richard


See attached press release
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 04/19/2001 11:19 AM -----

	"Nancy Pickover" <npickover@bracepatt.com>
	04/18/2001 02:25 PM

		 To: <gfergus@brobeck.com>, <alan.comnes@enron.com>,
<Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>, <donna.fulton@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>,
<ray.alvarez@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>,
<thane.twiggs@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: In re:  California Power Exchange Corp., 01-70031, et al.

Attached is a news release issued by FERC regarding a decision in the above
matter.  The court has upheld  FERC's approach to remedying the dysfunctional
California electricity market structures.

Nancy Pickover
Legal Assistant
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
2000 K Street, NW, Suite 500
Washington, DC   20006-1872
(202) 828-5861
(202) 223-1225 (fax)

 - NR01-20.1


Units will be 19, 20, 23, 28 (no serial # on 28).  I think the amounts and
pricing stays the same.

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 04/02/2001 11:13:42 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

No problem.  Let me know how the pricing schedule will be affected.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 12:07 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

I guess go back to the original contract performance numbers.  The other
numbers must be specific to the site for the Las Vegas project.

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 04/02/2001 11:05:25 AM

To:   <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

I changed the performance numbers in Section 10.7 and 10.8 to reflect
the changes requested by Lee Johnson in his 3/12 e-mail that you
forwarded to me on 3/16.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

Hi Pete,

Are the performance numbers the same as the original master numbers?  I
recall some email traffic on this.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/02/2001
10:22
AM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ps.ge.com on 04/02/2001 08:15:48 AM

To:   Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

Kay,

Is Salmon LLC the Delta Power project?  The unit 25-28 prices are $
15,769,725 per unit.  Unit 28 Guaranteed Delivery Date (=ex-works ship
date)
is 31 December, 2001.  A unit serial number has not been assigned to
date.

I don't know how your business teams on LV and Delta agreements are
distributing pricing and want to show payment and termination schedules
between the 2 deals.  Maybe you can poll Steve Thome, Bill Williams and
Jake
Thomas to get these answers.

For Salmon, the performance values in Section 10 will be per the 24 unit
master contract.
I'm in New Orleans today, reachable via cell phone 713-823-2055.

Regards,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 5:50 PM
To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)
Subject: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

Hi Lee,

Here is the new turbine contract, blacklined against the March 27
version.

I look forward to speaking with you soon.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/30/2001
05:48
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 03/30/2001 04:02:01 PM

To:   "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>

Subject:  Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

     Attached please find a clean copy of the Salmon Energy Turbine
Agreement (the second document below), which includes Lee Johnson's
proposed changes to Section 10.7, as well as a blackline (first document
below) showing changes to the (3/27) version you forwarded earlier
today. I have include notes within the agreement indicationg those
places where questions remain - e.g., how the addition of the new
turbine affects the pricing schedule, guaranteed delivery, etc.
 <<Comparison of Version 5 of the LV Cogen to Version 1 of the Salmon
Energy Agreement.DOC>>  <<Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 2.DOC>>
(See attached file: Comparison of Version 5 of the LV Cogen to Version 1
of
the Salmon Energy Agreement.DOC)
(See attached file: Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 2.DOC)


Thanks for your note.  Yes, I am available for the call and have asked
Sullivan & Cromwell to have someone available as well.  As soon as the time
is firm, I will be able to let you know who at S&C to call.

Tracy Foy
07/16/99 06:18 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meeting on Tuesday - Online Trading

Hi Mark,

Here we go again!!  Are you available Tuesday, 20th July at 9am?  Do you want
S&C to attend??

Thanks.

Tracy - 9707374
---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Foy/LON/ECT on 16/07/99 12:20
---------------------------

Edmund Cooper
16/07/99 12:09
To: Tracy Foy/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meeting on Tuesday?

Tracy, we need to get moving to schedule all the necessary people.  It will
have to be from 3pm onward to accomodate the people in Houston.  Ed.

---------------------- Forwarded by Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT on 07/16/99 12:08
PM ---------------------------

Scott Sefton
07/16/99 11:38 AM
To: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elena
Kapralova/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meeting on Tuesday?

After our meeting this coming Monday morning with you, me and Justin, I think
we're ready to have another all hands telephone conference on Tuesday (like
the one we had last week) to resolve the issues that have come up over the
last week or so. Please ask your assistant to schedule something, with the
meeting to include me, you, Justin, Mark Taylor, Louise, Elena, Andrew, Tim,
Christopher Millard, anyone else Louise wants to attend and S&C if Taylor
thinks they should attend. The meeting shouldn't take more than an hour.
Following our meeting on Monday morning, we'll prepare a list of issues which
we can circulate late Monday so people can consider them before the meeting.
Thanks!

P.S. If necessary, we'll cancel our Tuesday afternoon legal trading meeting
to accomodate everyone's schedules.


Hello!

An ENA employee wrote a book that was published in Russia.  There have been
three editions, and the publisher wants her to do a 4th.  The topic is
technical analysis, which is what she does here at Enron.  In this 4th
edition, she will be using public data, her own PC, and working on her own
time.  However, given that she has been at Enron for 6 months, she obviously
would apply some of the knowledge she has gained here in the revision of the
book.  She would not divulge any Enron confidential or proprietary
information, however.

What are your thoughts on whether she could be able to do this?  She is
willing to let Enron be a co-author, although as a practical matter, I do not
think that would be worthwhile.  My opinion at this point is that she can do
it, so long as it is on her own time and using her own resources, and, of
course, provided that she reveals no Enron-specific  information.  I welcome
your perspective, however, given that this is a new one to me.

Thanks for your thoughts.

Michelle


Please be advised that Ken Raisler from Sullivan and Cromwell will be
conducting  Sales Practices/Anti-Manipulation Training sessions this week for
the commercial staff.   The program covers  the legal implications of various
activities of our commercial team -- particularly as they interact with
customers in marketing.  The program also covers laws prohibiting market
manipulation that might affect our trading and marketing activities.

The two hour training sessions will be  held at the Doubletree, in the
Dezavala Room on the second floor at the listed times.   Please feel free to
attend and observe (since legal staff are more likely to know the answers,
you are asked not to participate in the break-out small group sessions).

  Session 1 Thursday, Sept. 14  2:00 p.m.
 Session 2 Thursday, Sept. 14  4:00 p.m.
 Session 3 Friday, Sept. 15  9:00 a.m.
 Session 4 Friday, Sept. 15  2:00 p.m.

Please feel free to contact me at X57373  or Mark Taylor at X37459 if you
have any questions.

Best regards,
Taffy Milligan


If thats the case, screw this expensive friggin' deer lease and lets devote all funds to the well stocked RV unit.  We'll just drive around 'til Sunday.

C.

----- Original Message -----
From: Fenner, Chet
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:05 AM
To: 'Brian Constantine'; EriK Wollam; Fenner, Chet; chad knipe; Joe Parks
Subject: RE: Privacy Please

These are key employees and a good mission statement for the Deer Lease
Winnebago business plan Erik and I were developing.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:48 AM
To: EriK Wollam; Chet Fenner; chad knipe; Joe Parks
Subject: FW: Privacy Please

Men...this is a classic. My favorite is #20...
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Bruder
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:43 AM
To: Brian Constantine; Jeff Stover; Jim Doxakis; Ken Pierce; Matt
Hanifen; Daniel Hill; Terry Turney
Subject: FW: Privacy Please

-----Original Message-----
From: Kelli Servello [mailto:k.servello@worldnet.att.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:04 PM
To: John Servello; john servello; Ohsonnyboy@aol.com; Kollen Nelson; BJ;
msteed@pdq.net; Dwayne Miculka; Dave Kirk; Michelle Kerbow; Larry R
Kerbow; Rob Fuchs; Ed Fuchs; Frogman; Bart Frames; Earle Dardar;
cory@multisignals.com; Chris Bruder; BigJoe@JoeBeitler.com
Subject: Fw: The Perfect Woman!!!!!!!!


Marchris said that Reliant is going to do an RTO cost benefit study for the SE.  I have not contacted Reliant.

We may want to think about whether we continue to do our own or consider going in with Reliant.


AND my COH balance effective 7/31/2000 is 4,053.932 ( a difference of 26dt's).

Scott.Goodell@enron.com on 08/23/2000 02:15:45 PM
To: jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc: dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, Chris.Germany@enron.com
Subject: Re: Theoretical Storage

Here are the theoretical storage volumes based on the schedule, not noms...
          MSQ       schd  Theoretical Balance
(Embedded image moved to file: pic14354.pcx)

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 08/23/2000 01:27:23 PM

To:   " - *Kinney, Doug" <BLOCK@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " -
      *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" <Scott.Goodell@enron.com>, " -
      *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Theoretical Storage

We need to reach an agreement on the theoretical storage as CES needs to
transfer to NPC a specific volume and price for COH, and AGL ESS, WSS and
Sonat. I had thought we had an understanding that CES would be billed, per
Melissa's memo of 3/15 and conversations during June, the percentages times
the
current month's storage capacity. We may have confused you by sending FOM
noms
for storage injections that were different than that formula, and Doug has
noticed the bills from ENA tend to represent the noms.

How should this be resolved? Should we go on ENA billed volumes or by the
formula? Let me know.
My calculations per the formula would give us the following balances for
7/31/00...
COH-4,053,906
AGL-Sonat- 504,379
AGL-ESS-9,827
AGL-WSS-220,209

 - pic14354.pcx


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
02:29 PM ---------------------------

Rakesh Bharati@ENRON
02/06/2001 02:11 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Raptors

Vince,

Here is the spreadsheet.  Please let me know if you have questions. Thanks.


Marcelo,

Evidently, there has been some discussion regarding the use of Enpower for
Natural Gas basis options.  As a result I've been advised to hold off on any
meetings until further notice.  Thanks again for all of your help and I will
be in touch with you as soon as I know how we are going to progress.

Susan


See email. All comments compiled/integrated.  Final just sent.  Jeff


Thanks I will begin the process for a Master and reply on status of other.

DP


Here are the points the gas is to be nomintated at for September by supplier:

Williams:
El Paso   15,000
Lomax Sterling  4,500
Delhi Cayanosa 5,500

Apache(by Cynergy):
Delhi   6,000
Lomax Sterling  14,000

(per Nancy Stivers)

She is to send me the nomination once complete.

Thanks,
Mark
x33396


Hey guys, I'm getting into PDX on Saturday afternoon and Stacie & I wanted
to know if any of you were available to do anything Saturday night.  I
realize the 23rd is very close to XMAS and there is a high probability of
respective family events.  Regardless, if you are free, Stacie & I are
going to hit the town and would love to hang.  Obviously significant
others, or anybody else is welcome.  This ain't no restricted affair (So
Stubbe you are allowed to bring your gay lover!!!!).  See ya...

Shark

P.S. We can save the Dolphin outing for another night.

James Sharkey
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.  USA
j-sharkey@kellogg.nwu.edu


Sitara 147092 is tiered pricing. If you want, you can nom whatever volume is
on the deal ticket and the economics will work out correctly. It will keep
things in balance a bit better, but you can go either way. For Feb there is a
base deal for 5000/day and a term deal for 20,000/day. Only 15,000 of the
20000 is pathed.


Her last name is Smock


---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000
06:04 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Steve Van Hooser                           04/13/2000 05:56 PM

To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clair
cc:
Subject: Thanks!

FYI

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000
05:54 PM ---------------------------

Melinda Winn@EES
04/13/2000 04:32 PM
To: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Thanks!

Steve, thanks for the update.  Most current resume is attached.  I appreciate
your help!

Melinda


Your eRequest for eConnect has been completed.
	-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

	In order for eConnect to work you need to meet some criteria.  Depending on the operating system, you may need to download additional 	components for eConnect.  Please check the following link and check if you meet this criteria:  	http://itcentral.enron.com/Data/Projects/eConnect/M7727/

Windows 2000:
	      ?	If you already have Internet access away from your office, i.e...high-speed internet connection such as DSL or cable modem:
		You need to install the attached eConnVPN.exe client.

	      ?	If you are dialing in:
		You need to create a Dial-Up connection (Please see instructions attached Dial In Instructions.doc) using either number listed below. You must be 		            sure to append the domain name to the user id (i.e.. CORP\rbarker) for the connection to be successful.
					Please use 713-440-4221 or 866-295-3813 for dial-up access.

Windows 9x:

Dial-Up access is working provided that Dial-Up Networking version 1.4 is installed on the system.  Dial-Up Networking version 1.4 can be downloaded from http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q285189.  Follow the instructions for installation.  VPN access for Windows 9x has not yet been verified.  Dial-Up connections using either number listed above should be setup using the default settings.

Windows NT:

Dial-Up access for Windows NT4 is working provided that Service Pack 6a has been installed on the system.  Service Pack 6a may be obtained from http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/recommended/SP6/128bitX86/default.asp. Follow the instructions for installation.  VPN access for Windows NT4 has not yet been verified.  Dial-Up connections using either number listed above should be setup using the default settings.

This information is also available on the ETS Solution Center website at http://www.ets.enron.com/Services/Solution_Center/default.asp under Quick Reference - Remote Access.

Thanks!
Lupita Cantu
ETS Information Risk Management
713-853-3876


FYI.  No action needed at this point.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/11/2000 05:13
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Gregg Penman                           06/30/2000 10:22 AM

To: j.burns@pecorp.com, Paul Burgener/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tammy R Shepperd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Lynne
Ruffer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sam Round/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Midwest Energy Cash Management Policy

Attached is a quick pass at a template for the Midwest Energy Hub Cash
Management Policy based on conversations with both Peoples Energy and Enron
personnel.  I have tried to get down on paper all the issues and have
included several bracketed items and comments that need clarification.
However, I have undoubtedly missed some things and welcome any input. If
everyone could provide me with their comments by Thursday July 6th, I will
incorporate them and work with Kay to translate this into an executable legal
document.

Thanks for everyone's assistance,

Gregg