In case you have to work late again and need a smile or two......
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2000 04:49
PM ---------------------------

"Taylor, Timothy G Mr USACHPPM" <Timothy.Taylor@APG.AMEDD.ARMY.MIL> on
05/09/2000 08:13:09 AM
To: "'Biddle, Joe'" <joe_biddle@abrealty.com>, "'Burke, George'"
<gburk@aol.com>, "'Cochrane, Scott'" <wsc99@juno.com>, "'Dawson, Tom'"
<sniggy@mindspring.com>, "'Donnelly, Colleen'" <donnelly@usgs.gov>, "'Ludwig,
Dad'" <ludwiggh@visuallink.com>, "'Payton, David'" <depayton@aol.com>,
"'Sharon at work'" <sludwig@comdt.uscg.mil>, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: 1999 Darwin Awards

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Pitrat, Charles A (Tony) Mr USACHPPM
> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 12:27 PM
> To: CHPPM-EHRARCP (TS-EHR); CHPPM-DESP (TS-EES)
> Subject: FW: 1999 Darwin Awards
>
>                 In order to keep this on a professional level please make
> sure you note the runners up.
>
> Tony
>
> Yep it's that time of year again!!!!!
>
>
> >Subject:  Darwin Awards
>
>
> >One of the long awaited moments of each new year is the announcement of
> >the Annual Darwin Award: The prestigious recognition of those people
> >who, by their own incredible, conscious actions remove their apparently
> >faulty DNA/chromosomes from the gene pool-making a safer place for all
> >of mankind to someday swim.  This is a global phenomenon and the 1999
> >nominations reflect the universal appeal and acclaim that this most
> >prestigious award has grown to enjoy.  So, without further ado, here are
> >the runners-up for this year's award.
>
>
> >(15 July 1999, Alabama)  A 25-year-old man died of injuries sustained
> >from a 3-story fall, precipitated by his attempt to spit farther than
> >his buddy.  His plan was to hurl himself toward a metal guardrail while
> >expectorating, in order to add momentum to his saliva.  In a tragic
> >miscalculation, his momentum carried him right over the railing, which
> >he caught hold of for a few moments before his grip slipped, sending him
> >plummeting 24 feet to the cement below.  The Military specialist had a
> >blood alcohol content of 0.14%, impairing his judgment and paving the
> >way for his opportunity to win a Darwin Award.
>
>
> >(11 August 1999 Germany)  A 42-year-old man killed himself watching the
> >eclipse while driving near Kaiserslautern, Germany.  A witness driving
> >behind him stated that the man was weaving back and forth as he
> >concentrated on the partially occluded sun, when he suddenly accelerated
> >and hit the bridge pier.  He had apparently just donned his solar
> >viewers, which are dark enough to totally obscure everything except the
> >sun.
>
>
>
> >(25 May 1999, Ukraine)  A fisherman in Kiev electrocuted himself while
> >fishing in the river Tereblya.  The 43-year-old man connected cables to
> >the main power supply of his home, and trailed the end into the river.
> >The electric shock killed the fish, which floated belly-up to the top of
> >the water.  The man waded in to collect his catch, neglecting to remove
> >the live wire, and tragically suffered the same fate as the fish. In an
> >ironic twist, the man was fishing for a mourning meal to  commemorate
> >the first anniversary of his mother-in-law's death.
>
>
> >(16 August 1999, Germany)  A hunter from Bad Urach was shot dead by his
> own
> >dog on Monday.  The 51-year-old man was found sprawled next to his car in
> >the Black Forest.  A gun barrel was pointing out the window, and his
> >bereaved dog was howling inside the car.  The animal is presumed to have
> >pressed the trigger with its paw.  Police have ruled out foul play.
> >(1999, Nicosia, Cypress)  Under similar circumstances, an Iranian hunter
> >was shot to death near Tehran by a snake that coiled around his shotgun
> >as he pinned the reptile to the ground.  Another hunter reported that
> >the victim, named Ali, tried to catch the snake alive by pressing the
> >butt of his shotgun behind its head.  The snake coiled around the butt
> >and pulled the trigger, shooting Ali in the head.
>
>
>
> >(August 1999, Australia)  Drinking oneself to death need not be a long
> >lingering process.  Allan, a 33-year-old computer technician, showed his
> >competitive spirit by dying of competitive spirits.   A Sydney,
> >Australia hotel bar held a drinking competition, known as Feral Friday,
> >with a 100-minute time limit and a sliding point scale ranging from 1
> >point for beer to 8 points for hard liquor. Allan stood and cheered his
> >winning total of 236 (winners never quit!), which had also netted him
> >the literally staggering blood alcohol level of 0.353, 7 times greater
> >than Australia's legal driving limit of 0.05%. After several trips to
> >the usual temple of overindulgence, the bathroom, Allan was helped back
> >to his workplace to sleep it off, a condition that became permanent. A
> >forensic pharmacologist estimated that after downing 34 beers, 4
> >bourbons, and 17 shots of tequila within 1 hour and 40 minutes, his
> >blood alcohol level would have been 0.41 to 0.43, but Allan had vomited
> >several times after the drinking stopped.  The cost paid by Allan was
> >much higher than that of the hotel, which was fined the equivalent of
> >$13,100 US dollars for not intervening.  It is not known whether Allan
> >required any further embalming.
>
>
>
> >(28 January 1999, London)  A flock of sheep charged a well-meaning
> >British farmer's wife and pushed her over a cliff to her death.  Betty
> >Stobbs, 67, was charged by dozens of sheep as she brought them a bale of
> >hay
> >on the back of a power bike.  The sheep rushed forward and rammed the
> >vehicle, knocking Betty and her bike over the edge of a vacant 100'
> quarry
> >near Durham, in northeastern England.  "I saw the sheep surround the
> bike.
> >The next thing she was tumbling down the incline," neighbor Alan Renfry
> >told
> >reporters.
>
>
> First Runner UP!!!
> >First Runner up Award goes to...
> >(22 March 1999, Phnom Penh)  Decades of armed strife have littered
> >Cambodia with unexploded munitions and ordnance.  Authorities warn
> >citizens not to tamper with the devices.  Three friends recently spent
> >an evening sharing drinks and exchanging insults at a local cafe in the
> >southeastern province of Svay Rieng.  Their companionable arguing
> >continued for hours, until one man pulled out a 25-year-old unexploded
> >anti-tank mine found in his backyard.  He tossed it under the table, and
> >the three men began playing Russian roulette, each tossing down a drink
> and
> >then stamping on the mine. The other villagers fled in terror.
> >Minutes later, the explosive detonated with a tremendous boom, killing
> >the three men in the bar.  "Their wives could not even find their flesh
> >because the blast destroyed everything," the Rasmei Kampuchea newspaper
> >reported.
> eeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
>
>
>
> And the 1999 Darwin Award winner is.....
> doh
> >(5 September 1999, Jerusalem)  The switch away from daylight savings
> >time caused consternation among terrorist groups this year.  At
> >precisely 5:30 Israel time on Sunday, two coordinated car bombs exploded
> >in different cities, killing three terrorists who were transporting the
> >bombs. It was initially believed that the devices had been detonated
> >prematurely by klutzy amateurs.  A closer look revealed the truth behind
> >the untimely explosions. Three days before, Israel had made a premature
> >switch from Daylight Savings time to standard time in order to
> >accommodate a week of Slihot, involving pre-sunrise prayers.
> >Palestinians refused to "live on Zionist time."  Two weeks of scheduling
> >havoc ensued.  The bombs had been prepared in a Palestine-controlled
> >area, and set on Daylight Savings time. The confused drivers had already
> >switched to standard  time.  As a result, the cars were still en-route
> >when the explosives detonated, delivering to the terrorists their
> >well-deserved demise.
> >
> >Not Quite Darwin Winners....but they're trying their best
> >National Idiots
> >Ann Arbor Idiot
> >The Ann Arbor News crime column reported that a man walked into a Burger
> >King in Ypsilanti, Michigan at 8:50 AM, flashed a gun and demanded cash.
> >The clerk turned him down because he said he couldn't open the cash
> >register without a food order.  When the man ordered onion rings, the
> >clerk said they weren't available for breakfast.  The man, frustrated,
> >walked away.
> >
> >Kentucky Idiots
> >Two men tried to pull the front off a cash machine by running a chain
> >from the machine to the bumper of their pickup truck.  Instead of
> >pulling the front panel off the machine, though, they pulled the bumper
> >off their truck. Scared, they left the scene and drove home.  With the
> >chain still attached to the machine.  With their bumper still attached
> >to the chain. With their vehicle's license plate still attached to the
> >bumper.
> >
> >Louisiana Idiot
> >A man walked into a Circle-K, put a $20 bill on the counter and asked
> >for change.  When the clerk opened the cash drawer, the man pulled a gun
> >and asked for all the cash in the register, which the clerk promptly
> >provided. The man took the cash from the clerk and fled, leaving the $20
> >bill on the counter.  The total amount of cash he got from the drawer?
> >Fifteen dollars. [If someone points a gun at you and gives you money, is
> >a crime committed?]
> >
> >Arkansas Idiot
> >Seems this guy wanted some beer pretty badly.  He decided that he'd just
> >throw a cinder block through a liquor store window, grab some booze, and
> >run.  So he lifted the cinder block and heaved it over his head at the
> >window.  The cinder block bounced back and hit the would-be thief on the
> >head, knocking him unconscious.  Seems the liquor store window was made
> of
> >Plexiglas.  The whole event was caught on videotape.
> >New York Idiot
> >As a female shopper exited a convenience store, a man grabbed her purse
> >and ran.  The clerk called 911 immediately and the woman was able to
> >give them a detailed description of the snatcher.  Within minutes, the
> >police had apprehended the snatcher.  They put him in the car and drove
> >back to the store.  The thief was then taken out of the car and told to
> >stand there for a positive ID.  To which he replied "Yes,
> >officer...that's her. That's the lady I stole the purse from."
> >
> >Seattle Idiot
> >When a man attempted to siphon gasoline from a motor home parked on a
> >Seattle street, he got much more than he bargained for.  Police arrived
> >at the scene to find an ill man curled up next to a motor home near
> >spilled sewage.  A police spokesman said that the man admitted to trying
> >to steal gasoline and plugged his hose into the motor home's sewage tank
> >by mistake. The owner of the vehicle declined to press charges, saying
> >that it was the best laugh he'd ever had.
> >
> >
> >
>


		     Hello KWARD@ECT.ENRON.COM, you have 2000 miles!

		Click below for automatic entry in Fly Free For Life Sweepstakes

         EARN

          Miles

        Save 25% Or More

        On Health Care

        Get A Free CD Player

        And 1,000 Free Miles

 	<img name="index_r1_c1"
 	<img name="index_r1_c2"
 	<img name="index_r1_c3"

 	<img name="index_r5_c1"
 	<img name="index_r5_c2"
 	<img name="index_r5_c3"

 	<img name="index_r6_c3"

		FLY FREE FOR LIFE!  Click any link above for an automatic sweepstakes entry

EARN UP TO
 Miles/$1.00

				Click here
to shop

				Remember - you'll earn up to 20 miles for every dollar you spend shopping at MileSpree's 345+ name-brand merchants.

		TO UNSUBSCRIBE: click here. Please wait until the entire page appears on your screen, then follow the instructions.
 Shop & Earn |
		Special Offers - Mostly Free | Profile |
		Refer a Friend
FAQ |
		Your Privacy | Terms & Conditions |
		Partners
MileSpree, MileSpree Rewards and the fastest free travel on the net
are service marks of MileSpree, inc.
Copyright 2000-2001. All Rights Reserved.


Anthony,

There are some changes that need to be made to the Material Contract List,
Schedule 4.13

(1) #57 of the Purchase Contracts contract 96046001 the contract number is
incorrect and should be 96047295

(2) #67 of the Purchase Contracts Global Contract 96051306, the contract
number is incorrect and should be 96051396

(3) #'s 27 and 28  of the Sales Contracts should be deleted from the list.
These are transactions and are being placed under #29 Global contract
96029942.

(4) Item X Newco contract an updated list is shown below.

Global Contract No.	Counterparty
96012228	City of Brazoria
96007529	D&H Gas Company, Inc.
96031541	Entex Gas Marketing Company
96003353	Markham Gas Corp.
96002113	Reliant Energy ) Entex
96004582	Reliant Energy ) Entex
96004597	Reliant Energy ) Entex
96019120	Reliant Energy ) Entex
96016887	Southern Union Company
96016888	Southern Union Company
96001400	TXU Fuel Company
96001402	TXU Fuel Company
96007681	TXU Fuel Company
96002879	Unit Gas Transmission Company Inc.
96060852	Entex Gas Resources Corp.
96004593	Entex Gas Resources Corp

(5) under (b) 2 the following language needs to be added

The Agreement requires consent of GPP's project finance lenders to be
assigned to HPL. This consent is in the process of being obtained.  Pending
receipt of this consent, a contract mirroring the economic terms shall be in
place between HPL and ENA.  This contract also appoints HPL as ENA's agent
for nominations and associated functions.  The credit risks are allocated in
this contract "as if" an actual assignment of the Agreement had been made by
ENA to HPL.  Enron Corp. guaranteed ENA's obligations under the Agreement.  A
substitute AEP guaranty will likely be required in connection with the
consent.

----- Forwarded by Robert Walker/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2001 01:08 PM -----

	Kimberlee A Bennick
	05/31/2001 11:29 AM

		 To: Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Revised Schedules

----- Forwarded by Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2001 11:28 AM -----

	"Wills, Anthony" <awills@velaw.com>
	05/29/2001 03:46 PM

		 To: "Kimberlee Bennick (E-mail)" <Kimberlee.A.Bennick@enron.com>, "Bob
Walker (E-mail)" <Robert.Walker@enron.com>, "Anne Koehler (E-mail)"
<anne.c.koehler@enron.com>, "Barbara Gray (E-mail)" <barbara.n.gray@enron.com>
		 cc: "Collins, Christopher" <chriscollins@velaw.com>
		 Subject: Revised Schedules

Attached are the following documents:

1.  Revised clean version of the Schedules to the PSA
2.  Marked version of the Schedules to the PSA
3.  Revised Appendix 4.19(b)
4.  Schedule 1.1(a)

Please note appendix 4.19(b) and schedule 1.1(a) are attached as separate
documents due to technical difficulties in incorporating them into the
master list of schedules.  Also, according to Tanya Rowhauer, the guaranty
agreement forwarded to me from Dan Hyvl should not be a part of the
schedules.  After your review of the attached please call me with your
comments.

Regards,
Anthony C. Wills
Vinson & Elkins, L.L.P.
2300 First City Tower
1001 Fannin
Houston, TX 77002-6760

713.758-4608 - phone
713.615-5507 - fax

awills@velaw.com

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You
 <<v.23 Bidder A Schedules to Purchase and Sale Agreement.DOC>>   <<New
Schedule 1.1a  5-15-01.XLS>>   <<Revised Appendix 4.19(b)  5-29-01.XLS>>
<<Compared version 22 to 23 Schedules to PSA  5-29-01.DOC>>

 - v.23 Bidder A Schedules to Purchase and Sale Agreement.DOC
 - New Schedule 1.1a  5-15-01.XLS
 - Revised Appendix 4.19(b)  5-29-01.XLS
 - Compared version 22 to 23 Schedules to PSA  5-29-01.DOC


My adds to you list are (1) the "2-Train" contract for Pastoria (7FAs, HRSGs
& other ancillary equipment) and (2) the "1-Train" contract for Pastoria
(agreement in principle with final, full-blown contract nearing completion).
--  Regards,
Karen

To: Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Barton
Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, David K
Bargainer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cheryl
Costa/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen E
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT,
davidlu@nepco.com
cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: WestLB

To all,

As you know, Enron is refinancing the equipment we bought through WestLB.
I've been asked to compile a list of all the equipment purchased through
WestLB, and the change orders related to same.  All I know about is the LM
deal with GE (with 1 executed change order, approximately 4 or 5 pending) and
the ABB transformer deal (with one CO pending).  Please let me know if you
are aware of any others.

Thanks,

Kay


Attached is my changes redlined against your latest version.


I like this better than Dan's original.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Richard Josephson" <rcjosephson@stoel.com>
03/13/2001 08:32 AM

To: nolan.steiner@avistacorp.com, dvermillion@avistaenergy.com,
asettanni@bracepatt.com, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, kcurry@bracepatt.com,
rcarroll@bracepatt.com, gfergus@brobeck.com, andrzej_kabarowski@cargill.com,
phillip_fantle@cargill.com, psteel@coral-energy.com,
psteele@coral-energy.com, rreilley@coral-energy.com,
elizabeth.sager@enron.com, mary.hain@enron.com, richard.b.sanders@enron.com,
smara@enron.com, snovose@enron.com, sstack@enron.com,
jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com, sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com, GErspamer@mofo.com,
KIrvin@mofo.com, KZeitlin@mofo.com, RLoeffler@mofo.com,
jmcgrane@morganlewis.com, mgriffen@morganlewis.com, bcurrey@omm.com,
jstamper@omm.com, mawilliams@omm.com, john.fryer@PacifiCorp.com,
nancy.loftin@pinnaclewest.com, Timothy.Bolden@pinnaclewest.com,
dmperlman@powersrc.com, rosteen@powersrc.com, hao@quinnemanuel.com,
dgarber@sempra.com, wdsmith@sempra.com, rbeitler@sempratrading.com,
PARAMFJORD@stoel.com, SJKAPLAN@stoel.com, mbrosterman@stroock.com,
mgoldstein@stroock.com, pjazayeri@stroock.com, theftler@stroock.com,
ayudkowsky@strook.com, CFR@vnf.com, GDB@vnf.com, HES@vnf.com, JRR@vnf.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Bankruptcy Notification to FERC

The attached has a suggested addition, assuming it is consistent with Dan's
conversations with Joe Eisenberg.  Either way the letter is acceptable to
PacifiCorp.

>>> "Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com> 03/13 7:49 AM >>>
Attached is the letter that we intend to file at FERC today regarding the
bankruptcy petition.  Please let us know by noon today if you have any
comments.

 - bankruptcy.doc


To All California Power Exchange Participants:

Notice is hereby provided pursuant to Section 19.3.4 of the California Power
Exchange Tariff that the United States General Accounting Office (GAO), as
part
of the ongoing investigation of California markets, has requested the same
information to be provided to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
Such information may be confidential under Section 19.3.2 of the Tariff.   The
manner in which the GAO will treat such confidential information is outlined
in
the attached letter.  The GAO states that it has authority under 31 U.S.C. 717
to evaluate programs or activities of the Federal Government, in this case,
deregulation of the electricity markets initiated by FERC.

The GAO has requested the California Power Exchange to provide such
information
no later than Thursday, October 5, 2000.  If you desire to assert a claim of
privilege or confidentiality pursuant to legal authority, the California Power
Exchange will include your written assertion of that claim together with its
submittal to the GAO, provided that it is timely received.  Your written
statement should be directed to the GAO as follows:

     Mr. Jim Wells
     Director, Energy Resources, and Science Issues
     United States General Accounting Office
     Washington, DC 20548

You may deliver your statement to the California Power Exchange as follows:

     Karen Koyano
     California Power Exchange
     1000 S. Fremont Avenue
     Unit 20
     Alhambra, CA  91801
     626.537.3173 facsimile

Any written statement must be received by Ms. Koyano no later than Wednesday,
October 4, 2000, 5:00 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time, to be included with any
information delivered to the GAO.  You are also free to take any other legal
action you may deem appropriate in the circumstances of this investigation.

Thank you.

(See attached file: GAO Letter 9-22-00.doc)

 - GAO Letter 9-22-00.doc


FYR

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williamson, Joannie
Sent:	Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:49 AM
To:	Bowen Jr., Raymond; Brown, Michael - COO London; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Delainey, David W.; Derrick Jr., James; Dietrich, Janet; Fallon, Jim; Frevert, Mark; Haedicke, Mark E.; Horton, Stanley; Hughes, James A.; Kean, Steven J.; Koenig, Mark; Lay, Kenneth; Mcconnell, Mike; McMahon, Jeffrey; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Sherriff, John; Whalley, Greg
Cc:	Blackwood, Connie; Burns, Jennifer; Chapman, Kay; Daw, Nicki; Elbertson, Janette; Ferrari, Kerry; Fleming, Rosalee; Ford, Sue; Harris, Stephanie J ; Heathman, Karen K.; Marshall, Lucy; McVicker, Maureen; Mendez, Yorleni; Phillips, Cathy; Rapacioli, Marisa; Schiller, Marsha; Stark, Cindy; Taylor, Liz; Tori Wells; Westbrook, Sharron; Williamson, Joannie
Subject:	Management Committee Meeting Today at 2:00p in the Boardroom
Importance:	High

Please let me know if you are unable to attend.

Thanks,
Joannie
3-1769


GT,  The theme of the party sounds excellent.  What time is the party on
Friday and where does the boat leave?  I may take a day of vacation.  I have
more than I can probably use this year.

G$

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Townsend, George" <gtownsend@manorisd.net>
08/09/99 04:37 PM

To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:

Gerald,

How are you brother? I'm doing fine. School is starting this Thursday so I
am working my ass off. Kind of anyway. (You know us state employees) I look
forward to Tailgate number 1. You are welcome to stay with me. Also, I am
having a huge party on a double deck boat. The name of the party is "No Le
Hace 99." That means "it doesn't matter" in spanish. (slang version means
who gives a f___.)The date is September 3rd which is a Friday. See If you
and Lisa can make it. You are welcome to stay at my house.

Talk to you later and Hook em Horns
GT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald Nemec [SMTP:gnemec@ect.enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 11:39 AM
> To: gtownsend@manorisd.net
> Subject:
>
>
>
> G,  How is it going?  Been a while since we spoke.  What have you been up
> to?
>
> As for me, just a lot of work and little vacation worked in there.
> Nothing real
> exciting.  Finally finished the redo of that damn kitchen.  I don't think
> I will
> be undertaking any home repair projects on my own anytime soon.
>
> I am having Austin withdrawals and need to get back real soon.  It won't
> be long
> now though for football.  Sounds like Redding and Sims look pretty good in
> practices so far.  That first game makes me nervous.  NC State is a pretty
> good
> passing team and we may have freshman cornerbacks starting.
>
> Now for the real subject.  Tailgating.  How is it shaping up this year?
> Same
> place, cold beer, good food.  I am definitely coming in for the NC State
> game.
> Lisa may or may not be with me.  Don't know yet.  Anyway I will be glad to
> contribute to the cause.
>
> Drop me a note when you get a chance and fill me in.
>


Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042617.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM


Looks pretty cool
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
01:19 PM ---------------------------

Robert Johnston
01/11/2001 12:50 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rommel Aganon/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Brazil coffee estimate: latest @35mm

After weeks of media reports and official Brazilian govt forecasts of a 25-27
million bag crop, we are finally getting to the real likely crop figure of 35
million bags, which we forecast in mid-November  (see report below the Dow
story).  I believe that this is the kind of information that can be a real
winner for the EGM Agricultural traders by clarifying the confusing and
misleading reports from Brazilian official sources.

RJ
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Johnston/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
11:28 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Rommel Aganon @ ENRON                           01/11/2001 10:19 AM

To: Robert Johnston/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Brazil coffee estimate: latest @35mm

Robert, we hit another one on the head.

-- DJ MARKET TALK: Brazil 01-02 Coffee Crop Seen Near 35M Bags --

  Contact us in London on 44-20-7842-9358 or in New York on 201-938-4435.

  1614 GMT (Dow Jones) Brazil 01-02 crop seen in 35 million bag range, says
trader. However, much too early to put a firm figure on it with possibility of
weather, other upsets, he adds. (CHH)

Confidential
                               Enron North America Competitive Analysis
 & Business Controls

TO:  Gary Hickerson
FROM: Robert Johnston
CC:  Erin Willis, Elsa Piekielniak, Vince Kaminski, Scott Tholan
RE:  Brazilian Coffee Crop Forecast
DATE:  06 November 2000

1. 2000-2001 Crop

This crop flowered from September 1999 to January 2000 and was harvested from
April 2000 to November 2000. The peak of the harvest occurred in June/July.
The 2000-2001 crop is currently being exported, and exports from the crop
will continue into the first half of 2001.  The consensus from our sources is
that this crop will be bigger than expected and total 32-33 million bags.
Brazil,s Ministry of Agriculture (Embrapa) is expected to release an official
total in the next 10 days, which may or may not be accurate.  The most recent
government forecast called for 28.9 million bags.  Growers have been issuing
similarly lower crop yield estimates for 2000-2001 as a way of calling
attention to a probable bad harvest and pressuring the government to provide
more generous financing subsidies.

The current dry weather impacts the 2001-2002 crop, not the 2000-2001 crop,
which is largely harvested.  Crop receipts issued by cooperatives in Brazil
are 11 percent greater than they were in 1999-2000.   Our top source in
London believes that the 2000-2001 crop has been largely discounted by the
market and that the focus should be on 2001-2002.

2. 2001-2002 Crop

This is the crop that should be currently flowering in Brazil, but was
impacted by the June frost and the October dry weather.  The harvest for the
2001-2002 crop will run from April 2001 to November 2001 and will be exported
in the second half of 2001 and in the first half of 2002.  The Brazilian
government is likely to release its 2001-2002 forecast in December or January
2001.  The 1999 plantings garnered expectations of a 2001-2002 crop yield of
44-46 million bags.  However, recent weather problems have caused a
significant downgrade of this forecast to between 33 and 40 million bags.

Other sources in contact with coffee growers in Brazil report the potential
for even greater damage to the 2001-2002 crop, in the range of up to a 50
percent drop, or 22-23 million bags.  Agronomists from Cooxupe, the largest
coffee cooperative in Brazil, have already pegged their first estimate at
27.8 million bags.  Again, however, it is critical to remember that growers
tend to exaggerate weather damage, which is then further exacerbated by
market rumors.  As evidence, dry weather in the spring (Sept-Dec in Brazil)
of 1999 caused alarm regarding the 2000-2001 crop.  Even though the dry
weather did not end until December 1999, there was still time for flowering,
which caused many market watchers to upgrade their forecasts.

While analysts and growers agree that the highly irregular status of the
coffee trees makes the 2001/2002 crop one of the most difficult to evaluate,
the occurrence of average to normal rainfall will greatly sharpen crop
forecasting efforts.  It is most critical for the rest of November and
December.  Recent rains since the last week of October have begun to address
the hydrological deficit in the soil.  Continued, steady, well-dispersed
rains will help offset losses, but estimated irreversible damage to the
expected yield of 44-46 million bags from frost and dry weather to date will
be a minimum of 15 percent, making the new yield forecast no greater than
38-40 million bags.  A shortage of significant rainfall between now and the
end of December could bring yield down to a 30 percent loss from the
forecast, in the range of 33-36 million bags.

Rain is particularly significant because the new planting in recent years has
been concentrated in the Cerrado (savannah) region of Northern Brazil.  The
coffee can be mechanically harvested in this region, but requires significant
irrigation.  The irrigation alone will only partially offset the dry
weather.

The frost damage from June 2000 accounts for a 75 percent crop loss in Parana
and a 20 percent crop loss in Sao Paulo, but these states only account for 20
percent of total Brazilian production.  In Minas Gerais (almost 60 percent of
production), the crop losses are only 10 percent.  Crop losses in Espiritu
Santo, which accounts for 10 percent of production, have been negligible.

Our sources will monitor rainfall and flowering/cherry formation on the
coffee trees, which must occur by January 2001.  The recent rainfall is
viewed as promising and supports our basis for a 33 million bag estimate.


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 06/11/2001 10:50 AM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	05/23/2001 07:04 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Summary Outline of our ongoing preservation discussions

FYI
Thanks
Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:37 PM
> To: Andy Pickens (E-mail); Barrett H. Reasoner (E-mail); David J. Noonan
> (E-mail); Jean Frizzell (E-mail); Michael L. Kirby (E-mail); Michael
> Molland; Mike D. Smith (E-mail); Peter Meringolo; Richard B. Sanders Esq.
> (E-mail); Robert C. Williams (E-mail); Susan Bisop (E-mail)
> Subject: FW: Summary Outline of our ongoing preservation discussions
> Importance: High
>
> FYI
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 2:41 PM
> To: 'Richard Rochman (E-mail)'
> Subject: Summary Outline of our ongoing preservation discussions
> Importance: High
>
> Rich,
>  As promised, here is my summary outline of what we discussed
> regarding preservation of data:
>
> 1. In Portland, we proposed to handle business email related to the
> topics in your preservation letter by instructing employees not to delete
> any email sent or received for 24 hours.  Email that is personal and does
> not relate to the business topics you have identified can be kept,
> discarded etc. at the employee's pleasure.  Each day there is a backup
> made that will capture the email in those employees mailboxes.  After 24
> hours, each employee is free to manage their email box as they deem
> appropriate to the business needs (e.g. keep, discard).  From our
> conversation, I understand that you agree that this is an acceptable
> procedure.
>
> 2. With respect to the hard drives on individual computers, you would
> like to get an organizational chart for Portland that would enable us to
> discuss 6-12 individual's computers that would be copied using ProQuest
> Drive Image Pro 4.0.  In addition, there may be some other individuals
> that you would like to have us use a software product called Robocopy to
> copy files from their hard drives onto the network.  Until we figure out
> which computers to copy etc. we will not begin this process.  We discussed
> that because of the holiday period, it may not be practical to get this
> started until after the new year.
>
> 3. Outside of Portland, we have proposed making a snapshot backup along
> business function lines reasonably called for by the subject matter of
> your request.  We propose not to backup any other business units or
> functions.  On a going forward basis, those business functions that
> related to the subject matter of your request would be instructed not to
> delete business email.
>
> 4. We believe that relevant database  backups have been and will
> continue to be made and preserved.
>
> 5. When an employee runs out of hard disk space on their computer, it
> is an acceptable practice to copy files form their hard disk to the
> network (where they will be backed up) and then delete those copied files
> to make sufficient work space for the employee to work.
>
> 6. For EES, I explained that their IT services are outsourced so we do
> not have as detailed information immediately available.
>
> As I mentioned on the phone, all of these discussions and efforts being
> made are done without waiving any objections that any of the Enron
> entities may have to your request including scope, burden, jurisdiction,
> relevance, privilege, privacy, vagueness etc. and Enron specifically
> reserves each and every right and objection it or its employees may have.
>
> Please let me know if your general understanding of our conversation is
> different than the above.
>
> Thanks
> Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


I am attaching the Form A for Power (East and West combined).  I am also attaching a copy of our 11/30 DPR and a reconciliation from the total MTM per the Form A  to the life-to-date forward MTM per the DPR (DPR and reconciliation are on two separate tabs).

Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks.
Casey


I have definatly missed you.  I have missed everyone.  I like my new job but Sean was right, it is very slow paced here.  I find myself fighting for things to do some of the time.  I live on my own, I really dig my new pad.  It's definatly different living by myself.  Please tell everyone I said hello and if they want my address or phone number you are welcome to pass it on.

Stacy Runswick               Hm.  (916) 391-3370
465 Rivergate Wy. #27        Cell (916) 425-5274
Sacramento, CA 95831


Former Enron Executives Launch Celeren Corp.

01/14/2002
Dow Jones News Service
(Copyright (c) 2002, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
PHILADELPHIA -(Dow Jones)- Several former Enron Corp. (ENE) executives launched Celeren Corp., a new company formed to provide risk management energy services through the sale of energy outsource products and independent power generation services.
In a press release Monday, Celeren said it will guarantee long-term fixed costs rather than the traditional saving guarantees offered by most energy service companies in the market. It will focus on small- to mid-sized businesses and institutions where it sees the most growth.
Thomas A. Brigger, formerly Mid-Atlantic regional manager for Enron Energy Services' energy outsource fulfillment operation, will serve as Celeren's president and chief executive.
Donald S. Parker, previously Mid-Atlantic regional director, asset risk management, for Enron Energy Services, will serve as Celeren's chief operating officer and on the company's board.
Brigger and Parker, along with other members of Celeren's executive team, left Enron in July to start Celeren.
"We created Celeren Corp. as a nimble energy company that will serve the unique risk management and energy utilization challenges faced by today's small-and mid-sized businesses by offering a valuable financial instrument," Brigger said in a statement.
Company Web site: http://www.celeren.com


Bill,

  I'm off the phone now, but I haven't had a chance to review those deals.  I'm doing that right now.
VA

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams III, Bill
Sent:	Tuesday, July 03, 2001 10:43 AM
To:	Chang, Fran
Cc:	Thompson, Virginia
Subject:	RE: PMA's

Fran,
If this deal was zeroed out (and it has been after the fact), then we should also have received a credit for no longer buying from MPC (the other side of the deal,
deal #549160). We should only lose $40 (the net difference). Any ideas?

Thanks,
Bill

From: 	Chang, Fran
Sent:	Tuesday, July 03, 2001 10:05 AM
To:	Williams III, Bill; Thompson, Virginia
Subject:	RE: PMA's

Virgina and Bill:

During our month-end processes I have researched deal #549162.1.  The counterparty did change as Bill pointed out, but what makes you suffer a loss in the prior month adjustments was due to the volume being zeroed out for HE 3.  Originally the deal liquidated with HE3 (40MWh*$135), HE4(15MWh *$135), and HE5 (20MWh*$135), but on 4/19/2001 the volume for HE3 was zeroed out in scheduling, which means originally you were given too much $ for the sale and therefore we are now taking that revenue you made in HE3 back.

Thanks,
Fran
x7973

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams III, Bill
Sent:	Tuesday, July 03, 2001 6:31 AM
To:	Thompson, Virginia
Cc:	Dunton, Heather; Chang, Fran
Subject:	PMA's

Virginia,

I have one question on this month's PMA and some questions from last month.  First, for deal #549162, this deal was originally put in incorrectly as counterparty TacomaSupp.  This counterparty was then changed to Tacomapubuit.  Why does a change in counterparty result in a loss of revenue?  Are we being charged for each counterparty again (like EES and ST-Cali last month), if so, we need to fix this flawed tool.

Second, for last month, we determined that the WBOM book needs a $108,000 PMA for change in price.  The appropriate price is in Enpower, but the revenue has never appeared (Deal #590753). Remember, this deal was originally input as a buy at $320 and a sell at $30 and liquidated at these prices. The deal is now at $320 and $300.  What do we need to do to get this trued up?
Please come see me with questions.

Thank you for your help.
Bill


Darlin', the last thing I want is to be rid of you. Get in touch when you
can.  And next time you're in town, I'm buying.

Best,
Jeff

Kathleen E Magruder
08/29/2000 09:37 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Late Homework

I won't say I'm surprised by your decision, but am saddened.  On the other
hand, you aren't rid of me yet.  I WILL be a force to be reckoned with out
there.  (actually I should say here.  I am in San Diego again today.)

I am on the run, as usual, but will catch up with you.  Just promise me that
Rick will buy us dinner next time I am there.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-JBennett+20+3CJBennett+40GMSSR+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, July 12, 2001 1:49 PM
To:	Frank, Robert; Kingerski, Harry; 'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'; 'John Klauberg (E-mail)'; 'Jim Steffes (E-mail)'; Lawner, Leslie; Smith, Martin; Neustaedter, Robert; Williams, Robert C.; 'Scott Stoness (E-mail)'; 'Sue Mara (E-mail)'; 'Tamara Johnson (E-mail)'; 'acomnes@enron.com'
Cc:	'gfergus@brobeck.com'; 'mmolland@brobeck.com'; Sanders, Richard B.; 'vsharp@enron.com'; 'jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com'
Subject:	CPUC Bi-Weekly Update

Attached is the bi-weekly update of events occurring at the California
Public Utilities Commission. As usual, call with any questions.

 <<X20615.DOC>>

Jeanne Bennett

 - X20615.DOC


Marie

I have checked our files.  We do not have an agreement with ABN Amro.  I have
also spoken to David Minns and he confirms this (David has discussed this
with Sara).

Ta
Shari


Hi Jeff:

Hope you survived Halloween up there - what a great scene!!

For some reason, I didn't get your original memo from last Thursday (11/9),
so I didn't get the attachment (Mike's proposal).  Could you forward that to
me please.  Thanks.

I hope we can get the same results with PG&E. That coalition was awesome
with SoCal.  Hopefully, I can get WHP as involved again.  They've been low
key lately as they're gearing up Lodi.

John

BETA Consulting
Burkee@cts.com
(760) 723-1831 Voice
(760) 723-1891 FAX
----- Original Message -----
From: Amirault, Paul <PaulAmirault@aec.ca>
To: <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>; <craigc@calpine.com>;
<counihan@greenmountain.com>; Davies, Phil <PhilDavies@aec.ca>;
<jfawcett@enron.com>; <rochmanm@spurr-remac.org>; <dcarroll@dbsr.com>;
Amirault, Paul <PaulAmirault@aec.ca>; <ALEXANMS@sce.com>;
<Mark.C.Moench@wgp.twc.com>; <tomb@crossborderenergy.com>; <burkee@cts.com>
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 11:57 AM
Subject: RE:

> I like the idea in concept, but unsure of two things:
> 1.  What the right time is to get involved as a group?  Serious settlement
> discussion has not started yet, and won't before PG&E lays out its first
> proposal (expected in December).
> 2.  What common 'banner' we would join up under?  With SoCal, the cause
was
> clearly real unbundling.  For Gas Accord II, I don't think a common
'cause'
> is as obvious.
>
> Paul Amirault
> V.P. Marketing                         PaulAmirault@aec.ca
> Wild Goose Storage Inc.             (403) 266-8298
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:02 AM
> To: craigc@calpine.com; counihan@greenmountain.com; PhilDavies@aec.ca;
> jfawcett@enron.com; rochmanm@spurr-remac.org; dcarroll@dbsr.com;
> PaulAmirault@aec.ca; ALEXANMS@sce.com; Mark.C.Moench@wgp.twc.com;
> tomb@crossborderenergy.com; burkee@cts.com
> Subject:
>
>
> Greetings Folks:
>
> As you know, the Gas Accord is coming to an end and PG&E's trying to
figure
> out where to go from here.  I would argue that what happens with PG&E is
> equally, if not more, important as what happens with SoCal.
>
> As you also know, we're faced with a retrograde PUC that, by all accounts,
> longs for the "halcyon days" of command-and-control regulation.  As such,
I
> think it would be very useful, and cost-effective, to pull together the
> effective coalition we established in the SoCalGas settlement.
>
> In that coalition, some of us contributed dollars and some contributed
> experts.  I think we should employ that approach again.  I asked Mike Day,
> who I think most agree, did a pretty good job of representing us in the
> SoCal settlement, to make a proposal for representing us in the PG&E case.
> Mike's proposal is attached.  Finally, if there's anyone else you think we
> ought to include in our coalition, please let me know.
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> Hope all is well with you and yours.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>
***************************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
> Jeff:
>
>            Goodin, MacBride is willing and able to represent a coalition
of
> end-users, marketers, and other interested parties in the PG&E Gas Accord
> II
> proceeding in much the same fashion that it represented multiple parties
in
> the GRI proceeding in both PG&E and SoCalGas settlements.  We would
propose
> to split our monthly billings for legal fees and expenses equally between
> the parties who agree to join such a coalition.  In exchange for joining
> the
> coalition, parties would receive frequent updates on the status of
> settlement talks and other proceedings, participate in conference calls to
> reach decisions on coalition positions, and have the ability to call on
the
> GMSRD lawyers on the case in order to answer specific questions or provide
> any other useful information.
>
>            I envision using several attorneys for various portions of the
> proceeding, including using associates and paralegals for research, and
> other GMSRD partners with gas experience for preparation of pleadings,
etc.
> However, most of the face to face negotiating, including working with
> Commissioners and advisors as necessary, would be done by myself as lead
> partner on the case.  I have attached a fee schedule for the GMSRD
> attorneys
> who would likely have some involvement in the case.  Because the majority
> of
> this work will be done in 2001, these rates reflect our new 2001 hourly
> fees.  However, in an effort to encourage participation in the coalition,
> and because several potential members of the coalition are past or
existing
> clients, we propose to reduce our standard fees with a 15% discount for
all
> participants in the coalition.  With this discount, these would be the
> lowest fees available to any of our clients in the coming year.
>
>            I have not made any type of estimate of legal expenses for this
> proceeding, as it is exceedingly difficult to forecast how protracted the
> proceedings will be.  Once we begin participating in the proceeding and we
> collectively decide how best to proceed in terms of actual participation
in
> the case, we can provide frequent budget reports and make more useful
> budgetary estimates.  If you require some type of estimation sooner than
> that, please let me know.
>
>            Thank you for your interest in using our services.  Please
> contact
> me directly at (415) 765-8408 if you have any questions.
>
> Mike Day, partner
> Goodin, MacBride, Squeri, Ritchie & Day
>
>
>
> GMSRD Fee Schedule for Gas Accord II proceedings
>
> Michael Day                                   $300
>
> James McTarnaghan                              $260
>
> Jeanne Bennett                            $220
>
> Alexandra Ozols                                $130
>
> Heather Patrick, paralegal                     $ 85
>
>


Attached is an essay of the impact of gas prices on generation investment.
If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me.

Ed
____________________

Edward N. Krapels, PhD
Managing Director
ESAI Power and Gas Services
tel 781 245 2036
cell 617 899 4948
ekrapels@esaibos.com
www.esai.com

 - ESAI Gas Alert 101800.pdf


Meeting of Insurance Law Section
 Four Seasons Hotel - Austin
 Room: San Jacinto West
 June 14, 2001

The Insurance Law Section would like to personally invite you to attend the
Insurance Law Section meeting and the free CLE which will be presented next
Thursday, June 14, 2001 at the State Bar convention in Austin.

On June 14, 2001, the Insurance Law Section will hold its annual meeting and
sponsor its annual 3 hour CLE program at the Four Season's Hotel. As usual,
Council members and Committee chairs will be elected  by the Section members
at the annual meeting. The schedule for the meeting and the CLE program is
set out below. We hope that you can attend the annual meeting and the CLE
presentations.

1:30 PM to 2:00 PM - - annual section meeting and election of Council members

2:00 PM to 5:00 PM  FREE   CLE program

2 p.m. - 3 p.m.
Insurance Declaratory Judgment Actions
Topic: This panel will consider declaratory judgment actions regarding
insurance coverage. When should they be filed? Who should file them? What
discovery is necessary and appropriate? Can they usually be resolved by
summary judgment? How should these cases be tried? What is the proper role of
the expert? What is the proper role of the jury? What are the appellate
twists?

Comment: The Supreme Court of Texas has repeatedly suggested that insurers
and insureds alike put this procedural device to more use.

Panelists:
Mike Huddleston
Karen Keltz
Rusty McMains
Claudia Volaire
Beth Bradley
Stephen Walraven

3 p.m.- 4 p.m.

When Negligence Blindly Assists Deliberateness

Topic: Suppose Mr. Sleeze Ball sets out to kill his business partner, Cheese
Square. Suppose further that Mrs. Ball helps Sleeze in various ways which
turn out to be necessary. Suppose further that Mrs. Ball does not realize
what Sleeze is up to and does not foresee the consequences of her actions.
Finally, suppose Sleeze is convicted of murder and then a wrongful death
action is brought by Cheesey's family (Swiss, Cheddar, and the rest) against
both Mr. and Mrs. Ball, and their dog Astral. Naturally the Balls have
homeowner's coverage and Mrs. Ball wants a defense. Question: Should she get
it?

Comment: This is a burning issue in contemporary liability insurance law, and
a great deal turns on it. Plaintiff's personal injuries lawyers take note.

Debaters:
Michael Sean Quinn - Affirmative
Christopher Martin - Negative

4 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.

Insurance Defense Guidelines

Topic: Many liability insurers have attempted to issue guidelines and rules
to govern the ways in which defense lawyers may conduct defenses. Often, if
the activities of defense counsel do not conform to these guidelines defense
counsel do not get paid. Recently the Texas legislature outlawed these
guidelines, or at least some of them. Is this law a good idea, or a bad one?
Will it be effective? Will it be enforced? Is it really in the interest of
insureds who are defendants in law suits or is it designed to help lawyers?

Panelists:
Charles Levy
Roland Leon
Clark Richards

Format: Audience participation on all of these topics is welcomed.
 It is positively encouraged, not that it could be stopped anyway.

We hope to see you there next week.

James L. Cornell
tel: 713 547 2231
fax: 713 236 5583
cornellj@haynesboone.com


With the flows almost doubling I would thing Agave should pay for this. Thanks for the help.
RJ

Arnie Bailey
05/22/2001 01:16 PM

To:	Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:	Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Roswell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Bob Powell/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject:	Re: BITTER LAKES GC

Kevin,
The project request below is for the Gas Cromatograph for Bitter Lakes, since they've increased flow.  At one time you indicated that marketing might fund this project.  Please give it you're consideration and let me know.
Thanks,  Arnie

---------------------- Forwarded by Arnie Bailey/ET&S/Enron on 05/23/2001 01:09 AM ---------------------------

Arnie Bailey
04/23/2001 11:47 AM

To:	Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Team Roswell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Bob Powell/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject:	Re: BITTER LAKES GC

Rich,
The cost is on the tab marked (CAPPROJREQ).  It's $35,600.  Bob Powell will do the project himself, including the completion report and as built.  This way we can save $10,000 or so by not including C&E.  I spoke with Darrell about this and he said rather than spend the extra money, he could do without the flow control valve.
I guess all I'm needing is to have the work order below approved.

Kevin,
We've spoken about this before, but will marketing still fund this Chromatograph?

Thanks,  Arnie

Rich Jolly
04/22/2001 02:14 AM
To:	Team Roswell/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:	Arnie Bailey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Re: BITTER LAKES GC

I must be looking at this wrong but can't find any costs. Arnie are you working with everyone on this project which includes a control valve. Give me an update. We need to get a project on this asap.
Thanks
Rich

Team Roswell
04/20/2001 07:08 AM
To:	Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:	Arnie Bailey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	BITTER LAKES GC

SEE ATTACHED REQUEST

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


Are we going to discuss these with Lavo before he makes a decision?

Hunter


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Woods, Trevor
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 10:11 AM
To:	Taylor, Michael E
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Thursday, September 6, 2001 1:57:53 GMT
Subject:

busy on sep 6

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Tuesday, June 5, 2001 2:52:52 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:29:05 GMT
Subject:

142 NOx
5/1/2004
msg sep 6

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 5:59:48 GMT
Subject:

set up some sort of meeting regarding urqhart structure:
engineering firm, pay for upgrades. technical services side, setting meeting with them.
Looking to sell put options.
10,000 tons each.
nov 15, 190
jan 15-170

Enron has right to put SCEG allowances at that price.

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:06:05 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Friday, June 15, 2001 2:07:45 GMT
Subject:

Msg 6-15-01

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Thursday, September 6, 2001 7:26:16 GMT
Subject:

Msg Sep 6

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Friday, June 15, 2001 7:41:41 GMT
Subject:

checking other sources b4 calling

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 7:39:24 GMT
Subject:

703 Nox
5/15/2010
will get back with me, checking on various structures

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 6:58:08 GMT
Subject:

msg 8-16

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 7:18:15 GMT
Subject:

233.7 T/NOx
Exp. 4/4/2010

call is very timely:
Hold some NOx and VOC ERCs, as well as some NOx DERCs
will know more around the end of the year (call back in Dec)

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Monday, October 1, 2001 3:37:06 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Thursday, June 14, 2001 8:52:32 GMT
Subject:

msg 8-17

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:20:23 GMT
Subject:

509-943-6599
Theresa

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 7:18:11 GMT
Subject:

Syngenta	William Toth	281-474-5151
52 tpy NOx

msg 8-22

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:17:56 GMT
Subject:

Denise Tuck Haliburton:
Don't know yet.  Potentially interested.  Don't have substanital amounts, have some manufacturing facilities.  Not sure which side they'll be on.  Could look to sell in the next few months.

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:28:08 GMT
Subject:

Main Office Street Address:
Tucson Electric Power Company
One South Church Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701
Phone:
(520) 623-7711

Environmental
520-884-3673
Norma

Right Guy: message in
JOso x-3642
Demagi?

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:27:50 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:44:13 GMT
Subject:

August 21, 2001
Individual Brokers, Environmental Brokerage Service:
John Vince:  Waste Management: Bay Area Quality management district: RECLAIM - unpaved roads:  paving a road is supple
800 tons of PM10 in Bay Area: 550 tons, only about 400 tons in bank, looking to double
60-260 tons at one landfill:
option payments up front, in advance of creating projects:
registering ghg reductions: on voluntary basis:   landfill gas:
Corporate engineering- Person
Looking at that on an individual matters, may have area VP or general consul
Director, Air Program
June 1st, run all LA vehicles on clean fuels:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Thursday, September 6, 2001 7:27:04 GMT
Subject:

Msg Sep 6

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Thursday, June 28, 2001 9:42:33 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Thursday, October 4, 2001 7:44:34 GMT
Subject:

22.3: NOx ERCs-
Jeff Hildebrand:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:26:56 GMT
Subject:

msg 8-14

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 7:31:37 GMT
Subject:

133.6 NOx
12/7/2005

Henry Platt: Out
Deals with Emissions: 713-669-2945
registered a bunch of credits for DERCs
Do a permit by rule on the comperssion, if over 240 HP.  Alot of smaller units,

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Thursday, June 14, 2001 7:04:33 GMT
Subject:

msg in 8-17

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Thursday, June 14, 2001 6:06:04 GMT
Subject:

gave me
steve hawkes: emissions guy; 713-740-1859

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
Date: Friday, June 22, 2001 7:02:25 GMT
Subject:


WAY TO GO BIG!!!
Good job...nice accomplishment.
Much props!
B

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Symes, Kate
Sent:	Wednesday, August 08, 2001 12:25 PM
To:	DL-Portland Real Time Shift
Subject:	High Five for a Smooth El Paso Checkout

FYI -

We had only one discrepancy between the El Paso model and the CARP report for July. Our checkout with Kathy and the Settlements group took approximately five minutes, as opposed to the five days we spent sorting it out last month. Thank you for your diligence and attention to detail in dealing with El Paso - you've made me very proud. Keep up the good work.

Thanks,
Kate


looks fine

From:	Terrie James/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/19/2001 04:31 PM

To:	Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Olson/ENRON@enronXgate

cc:	Sherri Sera/ENRON@enronXgate, Marge Nadasky/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	Management Conference - Save the Date

Steve and Cindy,

Attached is the electronic "Save the Date" memo for the Management Conference.  We are preparing to send it out next week.  Please let me know if you have any comments or concerns on the e-mail.

As for distribution, we've worked with HR on the distribution list for VPs; but will circle back with David Oxley's team to ensure we have the most up-to-date list.  Since some VPs in redeployment will most likely find positions within Enron by November, I don't plan to exclude them from the distribution ... unlike United Way, where we are not soliciting employees in redeployment for a contribution.

I look forward to any feedback.

Terrie James
Senior Director, Public Relations
Enron Broadband Services
(ph) 713.853.7727
(fax) 713.646.3248
terrie.james@enron.com


Here it is!


Hi,

The Evening MBA office is open 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. on Fridays.

Monday - Thursday we're here 9:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. for the summer.

Thanks!
TJ


Jane:  I forgot to mention that I will need to have our Japanese outside
counsel review the "credit section."  Who should I be dealing with?  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000 12:51 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	11/27/2000 12:39 PM

		 To: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT - 1. Credit matrix and 2. Threshold
amount

Jane:  Sorry for the delay.  I'm preparing a "cash only, two-way" section for
the ISDA.  I will try to get it to you this week.  Sara

	Jane McBride@ENRON
	11/27/2000 03:54 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT - 1. Credit matrix and 2. Threshold
amount

Hi Sara,

How are you going - did you have a good Thanksgiving?  Coincidentally
Thursday was also a holiday here - we were celebrating Respect for the Aged
Day though.

Actually, Sara, I was wondering how we are going in getting some drafting
together for the credit provisions discussed recently with John Suttle and
Jonathan Whitehead.

Thanks and sorry for the trouble.

Jane

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	11/09/2000 12:48 AM

		 To: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jonathan
Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT - 1. Credit matrix and 2. Threshold
amount

Jane:

If you have time in the morning (Nov. 9 Tokyo), I would like to discuss ENA's
view of the CSA/Schedule relationship.  In a nutshell, we provide that a
ratings downgrade is an Additional Event of Default in the Schedule (normally
a MAC in the CSA).  John's preferance, of course, would be a unilateral event
triggering an IBJ default (which I am sure would be difficult to negotiate).

I am not certain of the time difference but perhaps you could call me at the
office after 4 pm (Nov.8 in Houston) and I could then conference in John.
Alternatively, please feel free to contact me at home (after 7 pm Houston
time on Nov. 8) at 713-664-3207.

I look forward to hearing from you.  Regards.  Sara

	Jane McBride@ENRON
	11/07/2000 04:03 AM

		 To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT - 1. Credit matrix and 2. Threshold
amount

Dear John,

Jonathan and I met with IBJ today to try and push our negotiations through to
the end.  They are still unwilling to do a CSA with us but very significantly
their back / mid office is currently looking at getting systems support in
place which would permit them to do a CSA with us in due course.  They
acknowledged to us of their own volition that the market trend is towards
CSAs even in transactions where the counter party is not a bank.  They did
say though that it would be a few months before they would be set up to do
so. Pls note that they did not agree to do a CSA with us as soon as they are
set up to do so but they now know we will come knocking at some stage to ask
them to do it so I think we have gone as far as we can on this for now.

We will therefore move forward on the credit matrix in the meantime, if you
are still willing to do so.  The bank has a credit rating of A, so I guess
this means US$15 million credit limit.

On the assumption that it is possible to draft these terms into a contract
without a full CSA, I wonder who is best to do this drafting.  I should be
able to do the negotiations but I am not sure that I am able to do the
drafting .... Alan, do you have any suggestions?

Most of the other issues are sorted now but they still want to change the
"Threshold Amount" definition to US$10 million.  Is there any flexibility on
this?

Thanks.

Jane McBride

	John Suttle@ECT
	09/27/2000 12:39 AM

		 To: Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morten E
Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Steven Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

Jonathan,

One thing we might be able to propose is a "Credit Matrix" which prescribes a
Credit Line under which each counterparty can transact - with collateral
rights and collateral thresholds tied to the credit rating of each
counterparty.  We have used credit matrixes in several contracts here and
they are appealing in that there are no Material Adverse Change (MAC)
clauses.  This is appealing to the counterparty in that we cannot
automatically drop their collateral threshold to zero when a MAC occurs.  We
are comfortable because as the counterparty's credit quality deteriorates,
the amount of exposure to which we are subject decreases.  I would propose to
IBJ something like the following in lieu of a full CSA.  Jane and John - is
it possible to draft these collateral/credit terms into the contract without
using a full CSA?  (I think every matrix I have used here has been part of a
CSA).

Rating (S&P)     Credit Line
AA or above    $20MM
BBB+ to AA-    $15MM
BBB     $10MM
BBB-     $7MM
BB- to BB+    $5MM
Below BB-    $1MM

These terms are subject to negotiation.  Once again, the matrix removes MAC
clauses and the stress counterparties associate with such, but effectively
reduces the potential exposure we have (or THEY have) to a counterparty with
diminishing credit quality.

What do you all think?

John

Jonathan Whitehead @ ENRON   09/25/2000 08:18 PM

To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morten E
Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Steven Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

Sorry, Pressed send too early:

John, Have had a conversation with IBJ re the CSA, and they have asked us to
consider proposing a solution that does not involve a CSA. I propose to meet
with them again to try and explore why, but I would like to be prepared to
offer them a solution whereby we don't enter into a CSA, and we would limit
the types of trades that we could enter into with IBJ. My feeling is that we
would be unlikely to enter into any long term transactions (over 2 years) at
this stage anyway, and would prefer to get the relationship going, as I am
not sure they are going to budge on this issue yet. They appear to be quite
willing to discuss all the other points. We can always press for a
renegotiation at a later stage if we do want to enter into longer term deals.
I also want to keep the loan facility completely separate.

What are your thoughts on this, and what limitations would you want to put on
trades if we do not have a CSA?

Thanks,
Jonathan

	John Viverito
	09/22/2000 12:04 PM

		 To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron@ECT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT,
Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com, Kevin Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morten E Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron@ECT, Steven
Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

John-

During our last meeting with IBJ, we pushed hard for the implementation of
the CSA.  I believe that they have the systems capability to handle the
requisite activities relating to the CSA, as we understand that they utilize
same with certain financial institution counterparties.  We expressed our
view on these matters and also raised other issues that we had discussed in
our recent conference call.

IBJ informed us that they have never entered into a CSA with a non-financial
institution counterparty and my response was that Enron can then be the
first.  We requested that they raise this issue with their respective
superiors.  As you know, their response to our discussions relating to this
issue was "In terms of CSA, as we are not ready for running collateral
operations, we still do not prefer to use the CSA."  The legitimacy of this
statement is certainly debatable and the underlying reason may actually be
something entirely different, including the possibility that they merely do
not want to enter into a CSA with a non-financial institution.

We will continue to attempt to persuade IBJ to enter into the CSA with Enron,
however it is uncertain if this is achievable.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001
03:06 PM ---------------------------

From:  Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON
               02/05/2001 02:16 PM

To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell
Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean
Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--2/5/01


Anshuman,

The recommendation has been taken care of.

Vince

	Anshuman Srivastav @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

	04/02/2001 07:59:05 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc:
Subject: Recommendation for Jesse Jones Business School - Rice University

Hi Vince,

Hope this mail finds you well. Sorry to be bothering you with this, but my
application to Rice is due by April 6,2001 and I need to submit all
application material including the recommendations. Request you to kindly
fill in the reco form and have Shirley send the same directly to Rice with a
cover indicating that the same is for me.

I understand that you have a very busy schedule, but would appreciate if you
could fill in this form by the deadline and send the same to the B-School
directly.

I continue to relish the experiences from my visit with the research group
and look forward to working with the group again.

Regards,
Anshuman


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 01/21/2000 03:14 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Monique Sanchez                           01/21/2000 11:29 AM

To: David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com, "patbelle"
<patbelle@mail.ev1.net>, "Dennis Priese" <dpriese@worldnet.att.net>,
cornellad@aol.com, dmrickards@marathonoil.com
cc:
Subject:

http://www.emode.com/tests/dog.html

Try this out.  It is a questionaire that tells you what kind of dog you are.
I am a basset hound.


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000007590&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000007590
Request Create Date : 11/16/00 11:19:34 AM
Requested For       : andrew.burks@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Product Data Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


30 August 2001

To:    Steve Kean, Enron

Request: Is ICE regulated by the CFTC?
Response: The Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) is regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission only to the extent the markets are made on the exchange for products that have already been designated futures contracts by the commission.

ICE announced 28 August that its new clearing house, the formerly the London Clearing House of the International Petroleum Exchange, would clear cash-settled U.S. oil swaps for West Texas Intermediate crude and U.S. natural gas swaps at the Henry Hub. Since both of these underlying products trade as futures contracts in the U.S., the derivative product traded on ICE is regulated as well. The fact that the futures trade on another exchange, the New York Mercantile Exchange, is immaterial.

The ICE said its London Clearing House has applied to the CFTC for recognition as a Derivatives Clearing Organization (DCO). Section 5b(d) of the Commodities Exchange, Act, as added by the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (CFMA),  provides that DCOs shall be deemed to be registered under this section to the extent that the DCO clears agreements, contracts, or transactions for a board of trade that has been designated by the Commission as a contract market for such agreements, contracts, or transactions before the date of enactment of this section. This provision captures all futures clearing organizations that have ever cleared any futures contracts for designated contract markets before the CFMA became effective.

DCOs of both traditional open outcry exchanges, as well as electronic-only exchanges, have been approved by the CFTC. Applications by the Intercontinental Exchange and Hedge Street, Inc., appear to be pending.  A CFTC official told Intellibridge that few applications to create DCOs have been submitted since the CFMA was signed.

Sources:
CFTC, <http://www.cftc.gov/dea/dearegistered_dco.htm>
ICE, <https://www.intcx.com/pressaug01c.html>

For more information on depletion rates, or to speak with an industry expert, contact Intellibridge Sr. VP Kelley Kenyan at (202) 298-6300 x.256 or kkenyan@Intellibridge.com.


The following is our close schedule for this coming month.  Please keep in
the mind the following key times....

Unify to Sitara bridge back 1:45p.m. Friday, April 28th (all errors must be
clear by this time)
Mass draft at 6p.m. Friday evening.
Accrual process begins Monday, May 1st at 6a.m.

If you have any changes to this timeline, please ensure that I am contacted
as soon as possible.

Thank you,

Melissa x35615


Charlie, your call - just a question
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/01/2000
06:30 PM ---------------------------

Charles Vetters
08/01/2000 06:30 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: FuelCell Energy Term Sheet

Dave:

Our term sheets tend to be very general until we reach some sort of economic
deal.  Our group has tended to work this way, but I am willing to add more
detail as you suggested.

Regards,

Charlie

David W Delainey
08/01/2000 06:07 PM
To: Charles Vetters/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FuelCell Energy Term Sheet

Charlie, looks pretty general - only comment is what is the Product Purchase
Agreement entail?
Do we want to go into more detail on the nature of the alliance, the target
market and the nature of the excusivity (ie) wholesale renewables
applications, ENA, major state programs - all of it based upon the Conneticut
job working?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/01/2000
06:02 PM ---------------------------

Charles Vetters
08/01/2000 05:46 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffery
Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FuelCell Energy Term Sheet

Please review.  I believe this term sheet is in line with our discussions
earlier today.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON <mailto:Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com] <mailto:[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]>  On Behalf Of Mark Taylor (Vice President and General Counsel)@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 6:43 PM
To:	NYMEX Hedge Exemption List@ENRON <mailto:List@ENRON>
Subject:	PLEASE READ

To:								Department:  	ENA Legal

From:		Mark Taylor					Date:	May 11, 2001
		Vice President and General Counsel

Subject:	Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions for ENA's NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business on June 15, 2001 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO THIS REQUEST.


Megan,

Thanks for your interest in the Research Group. Please, call me next week
(Tuesday
and later) and stop by. I would like to talk to you for a few minutes before
we shall
go ahead with a formal interview.

Vince

Megan Cooper@EES
12/04/2000 04:54 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Looking for someone who has experience in finance, math,
programming, and the energy industry? (that's right, all four...)

Vince,

Following your eSpeak session, Erin Rice suggested I contact you about
joining your group.  I have been with EES for almost three years, and during
that time I have worked on tasks that are similar to what your group does on
a larger scale.  Specifically, I excel at analytical/quantitative problem
solving and the development of models and user requirements for application
development.  My educational background is energy management, and I have
recently become involved in the financial aspects of transactions.  I have
attached my resume for your review, and I hope you will call me so we can
talk in person.

Thank you.

Megan Cooper
Integrated Water Solutions Group
EES-NA
(713) 853-1461


Guys, where do we stand with Tom and the replacement combustion systems?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001
01:56 PM ---------------------------

"Tom K. Churbuck" <tchurbuck@powermfg.com> on 01/26/2001 01:58:49 PM
To: "David Delainey (E-mail)" <David.W.delainey@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Summary of Combustion Testing at New Albany

Dave,
?
Attached is a  summary of our test efforts at New Albany.? The new
combustion  system?performed as expected. We have taken orders from other
users for the  EA version of the system and will be delivering the first sets
at the end of the  1st Qtr. The new system would give you 3X the current run
time at New Albany  & Doyle. Is there any interest in upgrading to the new
system? I know we  have discussed it in the past.
?
Best  Regards,
?
Tom  Churbuck
 - Summary of Combustion Testing at New Albany_.doc


Roberto, If a person is accessing inappropriate web sites in the course of
investigations, it does not violate the policies.  However, it may be useful
to set up protocols or logs to confirm when a person is accessing it for
investigative purposes to remove all confusion on the matter.  Michelle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.


SUPER congrats!!!  Can I buy you lunch before the millenium?  SS


----- Forwarded by Chad W. Cass/GCS/CEC/PEC on 06/26/00 03:33 PM -----
|--------+----------------------->
|        |          William E.   |
|        |          Speckels     |
|        |                       |
|        |          06/26/00     |
|        |          03:21 PM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                            |
  |       To:     briley@enron.com,
dfarmer@enron.com,                         |
  |       stacey.neuweiler@enron.com, carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com, Michael
R. |
  |       Cherry/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Chad W. Cass/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Julia
A.|
  |       Urbanek/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Donna C. Spencer/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, John
A.   |
  |       Bretz/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Bruce McMills/FtWorth/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Marta
K   |
  |
Henderson/Houston/PEFS/PEC@PEC                                       |
  |
cc:                                                                  |
  |       Subject:     Eastrans Nomination effective
07/01/2000                |

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Please nominate 32,800 MMBtu/d into Eastrans effective 7/1/00.

Redeliveries will be made as follows:

25,000 MMBtu/d into PG&E
7,800 MMBtu/d from Fuels Cotton Valley

Sent on behalf of Bruce McMills.


[IMAGE]
  Dear Investor:  As you know, E*TRADE has a wide range of cutting-edge tools and services designed to fit the needs of each individual investor.  With all of these resources at your fingertips, it's difficult to sort through all that's out there to determine which products, tools and services are best suited to meet your financial needs.   That's where we come in! If you'll take a brief moment to tell us about your investment interests, we'll use your feedback to deliver resources that are suited to meet your short and long-term financial goals.   Take our short survey today!      We thank you for your feedback and look forward to providing you with investment information designed to fit your financial needs.  E*TRADE the #1 place to invest online.1
 1 E*TRADE ranked the #1 Internet broker by the Lafferty Internet Ratings annual survey (9/00).      System response and account  access times may vary due to a variety of factors, including trading  volumes, market conditions, and system performance.   HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE: You  received this e-mail because you registered on the E*TRADE Web site, or on  one of our partners' sites. If you do not want to receive partner e-mail  offers, or any E*TRADE marketing e-mail, you can change your preferences now.  You are subscribed at: kevin.ruscitti@enron.com.. E*TRADE takes your privacy seriously. To learn more about E*TRADE's use of  personal information, please read our Privacy Policy .   ?2001 E*TRADE Securities, Incorporated, member NASD/SIPC. All rights reserved. E*TRADE and the E*TRADE logo are registered trademarks of E*TRADE Securities, Inc.

[IMAGE][IMAGE]


This is an issue we have long struggled with.  We have conducted several
comprehensive reviews in the past and on an ongoing basis we go through a
resource allocation process which enables subjective criteria to be
considered in the prioritization and resource allocation process.  I think
the project is a good idea.  Your sources would be John, Jim Steffes, and
Rick Shapiro (for the RCR, or resource commitment process).

Doug Schuler <schuler@rice.edu> on 05/01/2001 10:59:10 AM
To: skean@enron.com
cc:

Subject: my work situation

Dear Steve, Jim, and Rick:
I just wanted to give you a quick update on my situation at Rice and to
inquire as to a future project with your group at Enron.

First, I apologize for my prolonged recent absences. I have had two
long-standing academic projects: one was due 4/19 (it was on "final review"
- a paper about corporate political strategy - and just was accepted for
publication at our top academic journal) and another is due 5/31. The 5/31
paper was commissioned long ago but is a key paper in a June conference
(topic is methods to study corporate political activities and the public
affairs function). In order to get it done properly, I need to forego any
work at Enron until later in the month.

A project of interest to me at Enron - and I hope one that you also have
interest - is assessing the effectiveness of governmental affairs. John
told me that he conducted such a study for the group last year. One of the
methodological challenges is to calculate the benefits that government
affairs brings - especially in a system where, for example, on the
legislative side, much of the "work" of government affairs is to block
legislation at very early stages. I suspect that govt. affairs needs to
justify its existence for internal budgets at Enron and thus the benefits
of the function are important to quantify. I'd like to review any of the
previous work and make suggestions as necessary.

At some point, let me know how you would like to proceed.

Otherwise, I hope all is well with you all.

Cordially,

Doug

Doug Schuler
Rice University
Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management
P.O. Box 1892
Houston, TX 77251-1892
(713) 285-5472 tel.
(713) 285-5251 fax.
schuler@rice.edu


Attached is the Transwestern Capacity Release Report that provides information for October 2001 invoicing.  The spreads to the California border narrowed during the month of October.  Therefore, two of the three index-based packages released by PG&E (Core) are below TW's max tariff rate and the third should be billed using the floor defined on the offer ($0.4455/dth), which does exceed the max tariff rate.
If you have questions or need additional information, please let me know.

Thanks,
Elizabeth


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/21/2001 03:09 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/21/2001 10:23 AM

		 To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Craig H
Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES,
Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
mpalmer@enron.com, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L
Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES,
skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, fvickers@enron.com,
Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: IMPORTANT CONFERENCE CALL ON QF/SRAC MATTERS SCHEDULED FOR 12:30
P.M. (NOONISH) ON SUNDAY, JAN.  21

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/21/2001 10:21 AM -----

	"Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>
	01/21/2001 05:42 AM
	Please respond to "Steven Kelly"

		 To: "Wayne Kawamoto" <wkawamoto@wm.com>, "Ward Scobee"
<wscobee@caithnessenergy.com>, "Tony Wetzel" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"Thomas Heller" <hellertj@apci.com>, "Ted Cortopassi"
<TCortopassi@ogden-energy.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steve
Iliff" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Ross Ain" <ain@worldnet.att.net>, "Robert
Frees" <freesrj@apci.com>, "Rich Dyer" <Rich_dyer@ogden-energy.com>, "Pete
Levitt" <Pete@calwind.com>, "Paula Soos" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Paul
Wood" <paul_wood@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,
"Milt Schultz" <bfpjv@c-zone.net>, "Marty McFadden"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lucian Fox"
<lucian_fox@ogden-energy.com>, "Ken Salvagno" <kbssac@aol.com>, "Ken Hoffman"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "Joe
Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco" <joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jack Pigott"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "Hap Boyd" <hap.boyd@enron.com>, "Frank Misseldine"
<fmisseldine@caithnessenergy.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Ed
Maddox" <emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "Duane Nelsen"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "Doug Levitt" <SDL@calwind.com>, "Doug Fernley"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Dean Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "Bob
Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>,
"Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill Carlson" <wcarlson@wm.com>, "Bill
Adams" <sangorgon@aol.com>, "Alex Sugaoka" <Alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "Tom
Hartman" <Tom.Hartman@fpl.com>, "Eric Edstrom" <edstrome@epenergy.com>,
"Scott Frier" <sfrier@kjcsolar.com>, "William Hall"
<wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Susan J Mara" <Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "Scott
Noll" <snoll@thermoecotek.com>, "Roger Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>,
"Rob Lamkin" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Randy Hickok"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Kent Fickett"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "Kate Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "Jim
Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff Dasovich" <jdasovic@enron.com>,
"Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>,
"Eric Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@neg.pge.com>, "Eileen Koch"
<eileenk@calpine.com>, "Dave Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Curt Hatton"
<curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Cody Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Carolyn
Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>
		 cc: "Jan Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>,
"Carol Hudson" <Chudson@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>, "Andy
Brown" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, "Doug Kerner" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>, "Diane
Fellman" <difellman@energy-law-group.com>
		 Subject: IMPORTANT CONFERENCE CALL ON QF/SRAC MATTERS SCHEDULED FOR 12:30
P.M. (NOONISH) ON SUNDAY, JAN.  21

An important conference call is scheduled for 12:30 p.m. (PST) on Sunday,
Today, Jan 21 to discuss the status of legislative meetings on QF/SRAC
matters.

Call-In number is            888-422-7124
Particpant Code is          111756

Status Report
After a marathon 12 hour meeting with Assemplyman Keeley, Senator Battin, QF
Parties, and SCE, a Keeley sponsored "deal" was proposed at 3:30 a.m. this
morning.  The crux of the deal is as follows:

For renewables and non-gas fired QF, essentially ...

7.8 cents/kwh for delivered power for 5 years ["all in", i.e. includes
capacity and energy]
1.0 on losses
no 'clawback' for wind resources which may have failed to meet fixed capacity
obligations in the past
Applies "going forward" (presumedly Feb. 1)

For gas-fired QFs...

7.8 cents/kwh for five years, assuming gas is $5.60;  payment will
increase/decrease tied to gas  (this assumes an IER of 9821)
1.0 on line losses
applies "going forward"
Caacity True-up and "forbearance" were not addressed.  Credit worthiness will
be address in the technical conference scheduled for later today (Sunday).
This program will require in part legislative blessing and direction,
followed by CPUC approval of individual contract amendments.  This is
essentially the PG&E/QF "deal" for the gas guys.  For the renewables, it is
more of a fixed payment approach.

A "Technical Conference" is scheduled for Sunday (today) in Sacramento to
work out some of the implementing details.


For your review and comment.
----- Forwarded by Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000 11:16 AM -----

	Eric Thode@ENRON
	09/15/2000 11:00 AM

		 To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie
Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Whitt/DEN/ECT@Enron, Brian Bierbach/DEN/ECT@Enron,
Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Vonderheide/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rex
Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: DRAFT PRESS RELEASE: Northern Border Closes Purchase of ENA Assets

Attached is a draft press release regarding the closing of Northern Border's
purchase of select ENA assets in Wyoming.  Northern Border plans to
distribute on Friday, September 22.  Please review and return all comments to
my attention by noon on Monday, September 18.  A final draft will be
distributed next week.

If you have any questions, please call me at ext. 3-9053.  Thanks.

Eric


I received a call this evening from our V&E regulatory counsel (Adam Wenner) who received a call from Dynegy's regulatory attorney, Dan King, about the need for both companies to making filings at FERC to notify FERC of the proposed acquisition and to state that, during the pendency of the acquisition, both companies will treat each other as if the two were already merged (i.e., the standards of conduct and affilate rules will apply).

Under FERC's regulations, as of the date of the agreement, Enron and Dynegy must conduct themselves as if they are already merged.  Therefore, Enron can no longer enter into transactions with Illinois Power to buy or sell power absent FERC approval under section 205 of the Federal Power Act, and Dynegy cannot enter into transactions with Portland General absent prior FERC approval.  With regard to the sale and purchase of non-power goods and services, all non-power goods and services provided by Illinois Power to Enron must be priced at the higher of cost or market. Any non-power goods or services provided by Enron to IP must be priced at a level that does not exceed market price.

We will work with the attorneys to make these filings, but we wanted you to know as soon as possible that we need to stop power sales and purchases with Illinois Power (if we were doing any) and can only enter into transactions with them with prior FERC approval.

We will send a draft of the FERC filing to you for review.  Please let us know if this restriction causes problems for you (e.g., you have existing or forward contracts with IP that are in effect or are scheduled to go into effect during the pendency of the acquisition).

Let us know if you have any questions.

Sarah


I have provided below an updated training schedule.  Tammy


Attached please find corrected copies of the subject agreements.


Vince and Datren:

I have scheduled a telephone interview with Ainsley this afternoon (Thursday)
at 2:00 pm.  Her telephone no. is 281-852-9116.

You can use conference room EB1938.

Thanks!

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000
07:45 AM ---------------------------

"Ainsley Gaddis" <agaddis@mail.utexas.edu> on 05/24/2000 04:09:07 PM
To: <Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Possible Summer Internship with Enron

Hi Ms. Crenshaw!

The best time for the interview would be tomorrow, Thursday, around 2:00.
You can reach me at 281-852-9116.  Talk to you then!

Sincerely,

Ainsley Gaddis


I'll get you my comments ASAP.  Has Shelley Corman seen it?


Are we taking a postion on TXU's purchase of Spanish Hydro utility


I can't seem to print this.  Can you try.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 08/04/2000
01:20 PM ---------------------------
Beth Perlman @ ECT   07/20/2000 05:25 PM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Refined view of our plans

Here is an excerpt of a presentation that was given to Sally's group.  This
reflects the action plan for addressing the Unify performance problems.  If
you have any questions, please give me a call.

Beth


sister in Eldorado  870-881-0841


In response to your request, please see attached.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Gerald:

Attached please find a red-line fo the EESI/ECSC agreement with my proposed
revisions and comments.  I focused my comments on the provisions relating to
the sale of energy by EESI and will defer to your review with regard to other
aspects of the contract (although I did make various comments throughout the
document for your consideration.)

Please give me a call tomorrow if you want to discuss any of my revisions.

Regards,

Leslie


Agree completely,,,Best regards.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 8:50 AM
To:	Williams, Jaime
Subject:	Travel to Mexico City

Jaime, further to our conversations earlier. I look forward to our proposed meeting and will coordinate efforts with Stephanie Miller to prepare for ENA's discussion items.  I have decided for at least the next week or so to defer my travel plans ( I am not the best flyer at the best of times ).. As such, we should work towards the end of the month as a timeline for us to come down.

We can nail down specific dates soonest.

BT


ENE is in a severe liquidity crisis.  Even if EDF makes mistakes we have to be careful how we treat them because Enron's cash position is very precarious.  It's good to insist that EDF give us what's owed especially since they seem to be wrong in this case but as far as lines of credit go, ENE is in a much worse position than ever before.

I am going to get a guarantee to Fimat today from Enron Corp with respect to ENA trades.  We have never had to do this before but if I do not get it Fimat will keep their trade line at $11 million.  Soc Gen (extends credit under Fimat line) is being a big pain but having spoken to our bank people we have no choice but to be grateful we are getting credit these days.

Please keep this bad cash/credit situation confidential.


Jeff:
In regards to the antitrust training, can you please schedule that at least
one of the sessions starts at 3:00 or later to ensure participation by all.
Thanks,
John