~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Want to help?  Forward this e-mail to your friends, and have them
sign-up @ http://www.bushetrain.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Bush Recount News
http://www.georgewbush.com

Contents:

1    Talking Points: Summary of Florida Supreme Court Decision

2    Help the Bush Cheney Florida Recount Effort

3    Dissenting Opinion of Chief Justice Charles J. Wells

4    Statement By Secretary James Baker

5    What They're Saying...

"Well, if you're a fan of chaos, you're in Nirvana."
- John Shubin [Florida Elections Expert] MSNBC, 12/08/00

_________________________________________________________________

1
SUMMARY OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT DECISION

~ A deeply divided Florida Supreme Court has opened up a Pandora's
  box of inconsistent standards, flawed hand counting, and delays
  that call into question Florida's ability to be represented in
  the Electoral College.

~ Further, the court's narrow, liberal majority has made a mockery
  of the idea of "counting every vote" by selecting only certain
  ballots and providing no standard to count them.  The four
  activist justices rewrote Florida's election laws after the
  election -- a clear violation of federal law.

~ Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Wells offered a stinging and
  forceful dissent; concluding:

  ~ "The majority's decision cannot withstand the scrutiny which
    will certainly immediately follow under the United States
    Constitution"

  ~ "The majority's decision to return the case to the circuit
    court for a count of the under-votes from Miami-Dade County or
    all counties has no foundation in the law of Florida as it
    existed on November 7, 2000..."

  ~ "I have a deep and abiding concern that the prolonging of
    judicial process in this counting contest propels this country
    and this state into an unprecedented and unnecessary
    constitutional crisis.

  ~ Judge Wells said the county-by county decision-making on the
    "clear indication of the intent of the voter":  "is fraught with
    equal protection concerns which will eventually cause the
    election results in Florida to be stricken by the federal courts
    or Congress."

~ For example, in Miami-Dade County, the justices reinstated 168
  votes that were awarded to Gore as the result of manual recounts
  conducted in only some precincts - all of them overwhelmingly
  Democratic. This would be the ultimate in treating some votes
  differently from others.

~ The Court ordered a recount of all counties' undervotes, but
  there are five major problems:

  ~ First, in many counties the undervotes aren't even segregated,
    so they will have to be machine tabulated and separated. We
    know this causes chads to fall off ballots and other
    degradation of ballots.

  ~ Second, 16 counties don't even know which of their non-votes
    are undervotes and which are overvotes.

  ~ Third, even in counties that have attempted to separate the
    undervote, there are serious problems. In Miami-Dade, the
    number of undervotes submitted to the Circuit Court is
    different from the number identified in the November 8
    machine recount. There can be no confidence that the pool of
    undervotes is untainted and consistent.

  ~ Fourth, the majority accepted two different standards (the
    liberal Broward standard and the more objective Palm Beach
    standard) further proving votes are treated differently in
    each county.

  ~ Fifth, as Chief Justice Wells said, the liberal court
    majority failed "to make provision for: (1) the
    qualifications of those who count; (2) what standards are
    used in the count-are they the same standards for all
    ballots statewide or a continuation of the county-by-
    county constitutionally suspect standards; (3) who is to
    observe the count; (4) how one objects to the count; (5)
    who is entitled to object to the count; (6) whether a
    person may object to a counter; (7) the possible lack of
    personnel to conduct the count; (8) the fatigue of the
    counters; and (9) the effect of the differing intra-county
    standards.

_________________________________________________________________

2
HELP THE BUSH-CHENEY FLORIDA RECOUNT EFFORT

Want to help? Forward this e-mail to your friends.  Then, if you
have not yet given to the Bush Cheney Recount, contribute online
using our secure servers here:
https://www.econtributor.net/Contribution/Contribution.cfmAID=IVFFBXFAZHGH

AOL Users: Bush Cheney Recount

_________________________________________________________________

3
DISSENT OF CHIEF JUSTICE CHARLES J. WELLS

"I...believe that the majority's decision cannot withstand
scrutiny which will certainly immediately follow under the United
States Constitution."

Excerpt:

"I want to make it clear at the outset of my separate opinion that
I do not question the good faith or honorable intentions of my
colleagues in the majority.  However, I could not more strongly
disagree with their decision to reverse the trial court and
prolong this judicial process.  I also believe that the majority's
decision cannot withstand the scrutiny which will certainly
immediately follow under the United States Constitution.

"My succinct conclusion is that the majority's decision...has no
foundation in the law of Florida as it existed on November 7, 2000,
or at anytime until the issuance of this opinion.  The majority
returns the case to the circuit court for this partial recount of
under-votes on the basis of unknown or, at best, ambiguous
standards with authority to obtain help from others, the
credentials, qualifications, and objectivity of whom are totally
unknown.  That is but a first glance at the imponderable problems
that the majority creates.

"This case has reached the point where finality must take
precedence over continued judicial process.  I agree with a quote
from John Allen Paulos, a professor of mathematics at Temple
University, when he wrote that, "[t]he margin of error in this
election is far greater than the margin of victory, no matter who
wins."  Further judicial process will not change this self-evident
fact and will only result in confusion and disorder.  Justice
Terrell and this Court wisely counseled against such a course of
action sixty-four years ago.  I would heed that sound advice and
affirm Judge Sauls.

Full Opinion:
http://a388.g.akamai.net/f/388/21/1d/www.cnn.com/ELECTION/200/resources/fla.sc
.opin1208.pdf

_________________________________________________________________

4
STATEMENT BY FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE JAMES A. BAKER, III
December 8, 2000

Ladies and Gentlemen,

This has been a rather eventful day here in Tallahassee.  Two
Circuit Court opinions throwing out challenges to absentee ballots
in Seminole and Martin counties.  A federal judge ordering the
counting of overseas absentee ballots in many counties that were
not counted for technical reasons.  And of course, the
disappointing 4 to 3 decision of the Florida Supreme Court just
announced, which will require manually recounting tens of
thousands of non-votes and undervotes in all Florida counties that
have not yet had a manual recount - and trying to do so by
December 12.

This is what happens when for the first time in modern history, a
candidate resorts to lawsuits to try to overturn the outcome of
an election for President.  It is very sad.  For Florida, for the
nation, and for our democracy.

Today's ruling by four justices of the Florida Supreme Court is of
course a disappointment.  Its reasoning and result place the Court
once again at odds with sound judgments of Florida's lower courts,
the Florida Legislature, local election officials, and, in our
view, the US Supreme Court.  This action will unfortunately
produce ongoing uncertainty and could ultimately disenfranchise
Florida's votes in the Electoral College.

The ruling of the Florida Court's four justices is flawed in much
the same way we think as its November 21 ruling that was vacated
unanimously by the United States Supreme Court.

Let me read you what Chief Justice Wells said in part of his
dissent today:
"I...believe that the majority's decision cannot withstand the
scrutiny which will certainly immediately follow under the United
States Constitution...  [T]he majority's decision to return this
case to the circuit court for a count of the under-votes from
either Miami-Dade County or all counties has no foundation in the
law of Florida as it existed on November 7, 2000, or at any time
until the issuance of this opinion...  [T]he prolonging of
judicial process in this counting contest propels this country and
this state into an unprecedented and unnecessary constitutional
crisis.  I have to conclude that there is a real and present
likelihood that this constitutional crisis will do substantial
damage to our country, our state, and to this Court as an
institution." [pp. 41-42]

We agree with the three justices who dissented from the action of
the other four.  We believe this ruling is inconsistent with
Florida law, federal law, and the United States Constitution.
Therefore, we have no alternative other than to appeal once again
to the United States Supreme Court for relief.  We have already
put in motion the process to do so.

_________________________________________________________________

5
WHAT THEY'RE SAYING...

Judge Andrew Napolitano  [Fox News Legal Analyst]:  "...what is
this doing?  Changing the rules yet again, in the face of a federal
law that says you can't change counting procedures and rules after
six days prior to the election."
-Fox News Channel, 12/08/00

Jim Axelrod [CBS News Correspondent]: "One of the first people I
saw after the Supreme Court ruling was Dexter Douglass, a member of
the Gore legal team.  I asked him what was next.  He said, 'Chaos.'
So far, nothing's been done to help clarify the situation."
-CBS Evening News, 12/08/00

Tim Russert  [NBC News]:  "...we could have chaos and a
constitutional crisis...This is as close to a political civil war
as I've ever witnessed."
-NBC Nightly News, 12/08/00

Mike Isikoff  [Newsweek Magazine]:  "...The Republicans got a bit
of a shot in the arm.  I was just reading the dissent of Chief
Justice Wells on this case, and he is pretty stinging.  It is
surprising language from a chief justice of a state court.  He
pretty much says flatly that his colleagues were wrong as a matter
of law.  They're going to be reversed by--he predicts they will be
reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court, and also projects--talks about
a constitutional crisis that is going to flow from this.  So if
the Republicans need some leg to hang their position on, they've
got it in this dissent..."

John Gibson:  "Mike Isikoff, a crucial question is here.  What
standard is this recount going to be counted under?  Any clue?"

Mike Isikoff:  "No.  That is exactly the question that I think is
going to loom largest over the next few days."

-Fox News Channel, 12/08/00

_________________________________________________________________

Paid for by Bush-Cheney Recount
http://www.georgewbush.com
______________________________________________

If you wish to unsubscribe from the eChampion mailing list, simply click here:

http://www.clickaction.net/partner/echampions2000/unsubscribe_box.html

To become an eChampion click here:

http://www.echampions2000.com


We've got a 2-deep OL lineup for next year but I question the quality as only
a few were legit blue-chips and I like the odds of getting bluechips versus
sleepers.  I think we'll get one of the 2 studs and maybe both.  The main
concern is that our primary weakness in the past few years has been a lack of
dominate line play.  We've got the skill guys, DB's and LB's.


Jeff & Steve -

Just a reminder that you are currently scheduled to meet each other upon your
respective arrivals in
Los Angeles (approx. 9 am) on Monday, Nov. 27th at Continental's Presidents
Club near Gate 62,
along with Eric Beal of Fontheim International (sp?), who will also be
accompanying you to your meeting.

Joseph


by this ratio the rest ot the power group is really underperforming!!!!

From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/05/2001 10:22 AM
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: May position : sold !!!!!

This 250K came from about 3 MW.
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Collonges, Remi
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 4:03 PM
To: Kishkill, Joe; Gonzalez, Orlando; Lavorato, John
Subject: Re: May position : sold !!!!!

We tried all day to sell this volume below.  Market is extremely illiquid,
given Annex V uncertainty and other regulatory issues: generators believe
Parente will help them out in May, while LDCs look at their contracts and
reduced demand.  However AES Sul accepted to buy this volume at 25% discount
to May spot price, payment on June 25th.  We will net about R$600,000
(US$250,000) between sale and purchase prices.  Credit is OK.

We will keep a very small, long position at MAE settlement for May.

Remi

Luis Berti
06/04/2001 05:39 PM
To: Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, David M Rosenberg/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo
Lisboa/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo Sassatani/SA/Enron@Enron, Luis
Henriques/SA/Enron@Enron, Moacyr Carmo/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: May position : sold !!!!!

This is to inform that we have closed 2.200 MWh for May to AES Sul at 25%
discount rate against spot price at southeast sub-market to be paid on Jun
25th.

Berti


Do you ever get the feeling that the idea you posted into the Idea Vault isn't looked at by anyone or going anywhere?  Well, listen to this.  Steve Gullion, EES IT manager, deposited an idea about economic data derivatives.  And guess what?  The Xcelerator liked the idea so much that they are now working on a business plan.
Go to the Thinkbank (http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/Thinkbank.nsf/HomePage?OpenPage) now and post the idea that has been brewing in your brain!

We've all heard Jeff Skilling say we need to "earn our way out" of the current Enron share price slump.  One way we can accomplish this is by doing a better job of managing company expenses.  Ask Kevin Hannon, CEO of Enron Global Asset Services and Policy Committee member, all your questions about how we can earn our way out, together.  Tuesday, June 19 on eSpeak at 10 a.m. Houston time.

Can't make the live event?  No worries.  Go to eSpeak (http://ethink.enron.com/eSpeak/exec/default.asp) now and submit your question.  Kevin will try to answer it during his event and you can read the transcript later.

After Kevin's eSpeak, we'll be opening a category in  eMeet http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/eMeet.nsf called "Cost Savings Initiatives" so you can continue talking amongst yourselves and helping Enron save.  (And if you've got some great cost saving ideas, don't forget you can put them into the Idea Vault in the ThinkBank!)


Janet, I received your message and heard you loud and clear.  We need to
diversify the talent working on your deals.  Let's get you together with
Julia next week to discuss.

	Janet R Dietrich
	06/06/00 04:01 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Chris Gaffney

I just heard that Chris Gaffney is transferring to the Toronto office. His
skill sets/capabilities have been critical in the closing of both the UI and
NSTAR deals and he has been actively engaged in the long-term NSTAR deal,
Con-Ed, and our Project Green Jacket. It is critical to our business to have
no transitional period with attorneys and I expect his replacement to be
fully up to speed (i.e. knowledge of the power market, understanding of
structured power transactions, etc) relative to definitive documents around
these transactions. Chris is definitely a loss to our team. Please advise as
to his qualified replacement on these specific deals.  Thanks.


Start Date: 2/5/02; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020523.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked.
Table

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstNW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/5/02
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: ENRJ_CISO_3000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


The party originally scheduled for Thursday night at Kells has been
cancelled.  The farewell party at OBA tomorrow night will include our phantom
farewell.

Where:  Oba, 555 NW 12th
When:  Tuesday, December 19th, 4:30 pm

Hope to see you there!
---------------------- Forwarded by Mollie Gustafson/PDX/ECT on 12/18/2000
03:49 PM ---------------------------

Mollie Gustafson
12/15/2000 03:41 PM
To: Portland West Desk
cc:
Subject: Farewell Gathering

There will be a farewell gathering on Thursday, December 21, 2000, 5:30 PM at
Kells Irish Pub, 112 SW 2nd Ave.  This is a phantom farewell, to find out who
the departed one is you must come to the party!

Shhhh.....it's a surprise for all!

Hope to see you there!

Mollie

PS. Please don't ask me, I don't like to lie!


Mark, herewith the list I referred to in my last email.  I've looked to see
if there are any CAs with a Duke entity with an Enron European entity and
there are none.

We ought to come up with a streamlined procedure for approving new reference
entities (rather than having it attacked contemporaneously on all sides by
several departments).

Thanks, Edmund

---------------------- Forwarded by Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT on 03/03/2000 07:41
PM ---------------------------

Mary J Heinitz
03/03/2000 07:39 PM
To: Michael Slade/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: confidentiality query

Regarding your phone request for a conflicts check with respect to Duke
Energy or affiliates, I find the following executed agreements:

Duke Energy Field Services, Inc. with Houston Pipe Line Company  - regarding
HPL's Three Rivers plant, effective until 01/27/01
Duke Energy Field Services, Inc. with ECT - regarding proposed expension of
Dauphin Island Gathering Systemor other of Duke's related pipelines to serve
ECT's gas markets effective until 01/14/00
Duke Energy North America with ECT - transaction involving Duke's supply of
long term power and capacity to ECT to support  ECT's wholesale supply
obligation within NEPOOL effective until 07/27/00
Duke Energy North America with ENA - possible Duke acquisition of ENA's
interests in a natural gas-fired generation facility being developed at the
Port of Morow, Oregon effective until 11/18/01
Duke energy Power Services L.L.C. with ECT - regarding natural gas-fired
electric power generation facilities under development by ECT in Illinois,
Indiana, Kentucky, Mississippi and Tennessee effective until 04/06/00
Duke Power Company with Enron Power Marketing, Inc. - regarding provision of
central control area, scheduling or other services to ECT or affiliates by
Duke in the state of Georgia.


David --

My thoughts.

I would change the section "Reliability" to "Operations".  The Current framework is Non-standardized;  Poor Seams Interface

Under Access to Transmission I would change it to say that "Not all Users on the System take service in a non-discriminatory manner."  Utilities can't discriminate versus like users.

Under Generation - I would change "optional" to Optimal.

I don't also understand the 99%.  Easier to say 100%*   * - Public Power recipricoity issues.

Thanks,

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:05 AM
To: Leboe, David; Steffes, James D.
Subject: RE: RTO's Slide for 3Q Analyst Presentation

David, some suggestions (I cannot write directly on your presentation for some reason, so please call me at 713-301-3421 if you have questions.)

Add "real time" price
Add costs and "risk premiums"
Add Generation "and Transmission"
Add lack of "valid" grid information
Change the benefits to "Better ability for customers to utilize numerous energy products, including forward hedging tools and demand side management."  [[Which Enron sells!]]

Change Market to "Wholesale Market"  open

Also, why do you say 99% open after RTOs?  Is this due to publics that don't participate?  If so, then maybe say "100% open to the extent that non-jurisdictional entities, such as federal power agencies and state power authorities, participate"  or name some examples, such as TVA and BPA.

-----Original Message-----
From: Leboe, David
Sent: Thu 10/11/2001 9:14 AM
To: Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.
Cc:
Subject: RTO's Slide for 3Q Analyst Presentation

Please find the latest draft of the RTO slide for inclusion in next week's 3Q Analyst Conference Pitchbook. Greg Whalley will be presenting the Wholesale Section which will include a brief RTO's discussion.

Please take a minute and review and let me know if you have any comments/concerns with the wording.

Kind Regards.

Untitled Attachment

David T. Leboe
Director, Investor Relations
Enron Corp.

Office  713.853.4785
Cell  713.562.2160
Fax   713.646.3002
Pager  877.237.7732
david.leboe@enron.com


When: Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:00 AM-10:30 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB 3872

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Dial In Information:
Number:   800-711-8000
Pass Code:  6349#


Just a reminder about drinks Monday night..


it doesn't appear that you received this....
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 03/14/2000
12:50 PM ---------------------------

"Clarke-Koonce, Pamela R." <pclarkkoonce@velaw.com> on 03/14/2000 11:37:54 AM
To: "'csandhe@enron.com'" <csandhe@enron.com>, "'anavin@enron.com'"
<anavin@enron.com>
cc: "Wenner, Adam" <awenner@velaw.com>

Subject: Transmission Legislation

 <<73084_3.DOC>>

Please see the attached per Adam Wenner:

Cynthia -- Attached is the transmission legislation we discussed.  Please
note the following:

1.  Revised Sections 201(a) and (b) are not particularly substantive; they
simply correspond the statement of FERC's jurisdiction to our new approach.
The real substance is in the amendments to Section 206.  Consequently, we
might want to exclude the Section 201 changes when we circulate it to those
to whom we're just trying to explain the concepts.

2.  Our prior draft contained exceptions to the prohibitions to the
prohibition on discriminatory treatment, regarding protection of native load
to protect system reliability and to preserve a utility's ability to comply
with state-imposed obligations to serve.  I believe these concepts,
particularly the second, is inconsistent with our new approach, but  before
deleting these, wanted to make sure that there is not a political reason
that we should leave them in.  I have italicized and bolded these
provisions.

 - 73084_3.DOC


Start Date: 1/12/02; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011219.txt


Attached for your review and comment is a broad outline of a rate proposal to
Caithness for the construction and operation of the 40-mile lateral to the
Big Sandy project.  This non-binding proposal was requested by Caithness'
consultant, George Briden, as a starting point for modeling the economics of
the project's gas supply and a basis for further discussions aimed at
designing an appropriate deal structure.  For your information, James
Centilli calculated the transport rate based on the (+/- 30%) $20.33MM cost
estimate with a ten-year (contract) amortization.

I plan to put this in the mail by the close of business tomorrow.  If you
have any suggestions, please let me hear from you by mid-day.   Thanks.


Cara et all,

	Following list of bug fixes are moving out to stage to address the recently reported issues:

	New versions of both applications have been moved out to stage..

PreSchedule Workspace:
#1
Problem:
Uploading to the Path Confirm Area:*accepted Mid C-1:53   Rockies-0:22    Palo 1:11  COB 0:49 (Row 69 Generated a General SQL error message)
This is showing Physical and non-physical right.

Solution:
Line 69 , the timezone value under column G was '6/20/2001-6/20/2001' when it should have been 'PDT' or any other valid timezone value.

#2
Problem:
Running Build Route Report:
	Criteria Selection-unable to select criteria for build route, got "List index out of bounds (4)" error *needs fix

Solution:
Fixed.. was losing track of which workspace was open

#3
Problem:
Daily Summary Function
*needs fix or workaround-Would not work at all, got 3 error messages. " Unable to locate" "can't find last row!", and "Failed to export summary!" this is going to create a csv file right to the AGG sched vol report now according to Mr. Poston, I am thrilled to hear it.

Solution:
Executive Report was just pushed to stage yesterday, the data is currently what we're focusing on with this release and will soon start shaping it to make it visualy look like the pre-existing excel-based Executive Report.

#4
Problem:
Error Checking - took 1:29, produced a line by line error sheet that is printable, *accepted
	BUT routing errors for lines 19-223 in the COB sheet produced a routing error that just states "ERROR:" no reason.  We need to know why an error is shown(was 	run after all routes were deleted) *needs fix

Solution:
Error Checking will not spit out any errors if there aren't any.

Path Confirmation:

#1
Problem:
One little housekeeping thing,  can we move the delete button away from the confirm button?  Perhaps on the other side of the exit button?  This will save us mucho headaches later. OR make the dialog box look more like a warning that a record has been selected for deletion?

Solution:
Dialog box included for deletion alert confirmation purposes and button repositioned.

thanks
Asem
x31700

PreSchedule Workspace:

Running Build Route Report:
	Criteria Selection-unable to select criteria for build route, got "List index out of bounds (4)" error *needs fix

Error Checking - took 1:29, produced a line by line error sheet that is printable, *accepted
	BUT routing errors for lines 19-223 in the COB sheet produced a routing error that just states "ERROR:" no reason.  We need to know why an error is shown(was 	run after all routes were deleted) *needs fix

Uploading to the Path Confirm Area:*accepted Mid C-1:53   Rockies-0:22    Palo 1:11  COB 0:49 (Row 69 Generated a General SQL error message)
This is showing Physical and non-physical right.

Daily Summary Function
*needs fix or workaround-Would not work at all, got 3 error messages. " Unable to locate" "can't find last row!", and "Failed to export summary!" this is going to create a csv file right to the AGG sched vol report now according to Mr. Poston, I am thrilled to hear it.

Routing
Mid C-13:27   Rockies-2:23   Palo 7:56  COB 5:12 the time is fine.

**needs fix**The routes are still not showing designated Physical or Non-Physical Properly. All are coming through as Non-Physical.  This is must be fixed prior to release for production as our WSCC fee pulls directly from this data in deal Scheduling.

Path Confirmation:

Speed is very much an issue here,  I had Mark Guzman sit with me while I cut a path and when I confirmed a group of paths. The confirmation of 5 paths as a group took 70 seconds from the time I entered the name and hit the "ok" button until the confriming was completed. This is too long, we need this to be 20-30 seconds max. Currently, this process takes about 10 seconds in lotus. Confriming 2 paths with the 20th fully populated took 1:39.

Cutting a path went fast enough until I closed the screen to go back to the confirmation report. This also took over a minute.  This is another 10 second process in lotus.

One little housekeeping thing,  can we move the delete button away from the confirm button?  Perhaps on the other side of the exit button?  This will save us mucho headaches later. OR make the dialog box look more like a warning that a record has been selected for deletion?

All of the sorting looks great, the paths are represented properly, we are very very close!

Real Time Discussion:

Where are we on this?  I heard initial rumblings, but nothing lately.

Here are the sheets that I have used to create data for 6/20

 << File: COB_JUNE20_USEME.psc >>  << File: Mid_C_June20.psc >>  << File: Palo_June20.psc >>  << File: Rockies_June_20.psc >>

I can do more testing or Net meeting stuff tomorrow until about 10:30, but after that I have to be a scheduler for a couple of hours.

Thanks,

Cara


Ted/Sally,

I believe you are both aware of the situation, but here is our briefing note
for Sherriff,Brown,Causey, Buy.

Mike and I will be following-up with both of you.

Fernley


I'm free after 11 am - Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/30/2000 08:13 AM -----

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/29/2000 07:09 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Midwest Energy Hub LLC ("Midwest")

Sara,

Maybe a conference call with Gregg would be the most productive way to go.

Kay

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 08/23/2000 05:19 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Midwest Energy Hub LLC ("Midwest")

Kay:  I left you a voice mail yesterday at Sheila's suggestion regarding
Midwest.  Greg and I discussed the use of ENA's format of ISDA documentation
by Midwest and I have a couple of questions about how our docs will be used,
whether Midwest will be competing with us and who will be negotiating hedge
agreements on behalf of Midwest (i.e., will ENA swap lawyers be involved?).
Please call me so that I can comply with Greg's request..
Thanks.  Sara

Greg:  I will have the boilerplate sent to you separately.


Louise,

Am working with the Marks to resolve our issues. I have a feeling this email of a few days ago may come up now or in the future, so here is a copy if you ever need it.

The email covers the use of www.ubswenergy.com and the "conditions" around it.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Ursula.Mills@ubsw.com [mailto:Ursula.Mills@ubsw.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:53 AM
To: Forster, David; Shah, Kal
Cc: Penny.Hope@ubsw.com; Webb, Jay
Subject: FW: UBS Warburg and Enron
Importance: High

Hi Dave / Kal

Looks like we can use the ubswenergy.com domain name for a few months
then integrate you guys into the ubswarburg policies over time.  Can
you send back an email confirming that this works for you.  I think
this is the best compromise we can reach for the moment which allows us
to not waste any more time in discussions!

thx
Ursula

-----Original Message-----
From: Penny Hope
Sent: 16 January 2002 05:52
To: Stuart Hepburn; Ursula Mills; Pat ODonnell
Cc: Elisabeth Green; Judit Kiss; Andrew-D Lloyd
Subject: UBS Warburg and Enron
Importance: High

Stuart

Following our conversation this morning I just want to confirm what we
have agreed.

Pat - please can you read through the points below and send Stuart an
e-mail confirming that you agree with everything, particularly the
'Conditions' section, and that all the UBS Warburg Energy staff will
comply with the conditions as laid out below.

Decisions:
=======
1) The brand name for the new trading entity that we are acquiring from
Enron will be UBS Warburg Energy.

2) The domain name will be www.ubswenergy.com and we will also point,
but not market, various other domain names to the site, eg
www.ubsenergy.com, www.ubswarburgenergy.com

3) The new entity will follow all UBS Warburg corporate identity rules
in terms of font, imagery and colour usage for all printed and online
material.

Conditions:
========
1) That in 6 months' time (week beginning 29 July 2002) our position is
reviewed. If this venture is successful and we plan to continue with
it, the branding position will change and the entity will be fully
incorporated into UBS Warburg and any changes necessary with regard to
branding will be made.

2) The domain name will change, will follow corporate guidelines and
will follow the format of www.ubswarburg.com/energy (where the
'/energy' part can be discussed in order to ensure the most appropriate
name is used.

3) All printed material will be changed to reflect the change in brand
which therefore means that any material produced immediately will have
a relatively short shelf-life as it may have to be re-printed.

Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.


Who is the interim appointee?

From: Jeff Dasovich on 01/04/2001 02:58 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Craig H
Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas
Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES,
Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES,
Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, mpalmer@enron.com, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES,
skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mjackso7@enron.com, psmith3@enron.com

Subject: Brief Summary of Today's Activities in California (at Least Thus
Far)

The Commission voted out the order 5-0, essentially as it appeared
yesterday.  Three key changes:
They clarified that the surcharge applies to Direct Access customers (but the
entire "rate freeze" structure remains intact for now).
The Commission reversed itself and chose not to adopt TURN's "netting out" of
gen revenues and CTC collections, and said instead that the Commission will
consider it as an option in the next phase (a move likely made in order to
lower chances of a successful utility appeal).
The Commission added to the decision language saying that it will study the
pros/cons of securitizating the utilities' power purchase costs.  They will
submit a report on the issue to the Governor and Legislature.
On this last point, wire reports are rampant about the possibility that
legislation will be introduced as early as today proposing to securitize the
utilties' power purchase costs.  This action has reportedly been the result
of discussions that occured through the night between the governor's office,
the utilities and the ratings agencies in reponse to the fact that the
decision issued by the PUC falls well short of what's needed to keep the IOUs
credit worthy and solvent.  As a result of those wires stories, the
utilities' stock has come back (Edison was down as low as 6.25 and is
currently at 10 7/8; PG&E was at 8 7/8 and is currently at 11 7/8).  We're
working with Sandi McCubbin, who heads-up our legislative activities in
California, to get more info and will report back.
The hearing was dominated by highly charged anti-generator, anti-marketer
rhetoric, which is likely to play a prominent role in the press accounts.
Only FERC was demonized more.
Each of the Commissioners, including the most recent "interim" appointee,
made strong statements regarding the undesirability of utility bankruptcy.
The Commission left open the possibility of "doing more" at their next
meeting (two weeks from today), which means the negotiations with the
utilities and ratings agencies are likely to continue. And if an agreement is
reached, it could end up on the next agenda.


I attach a draft agenda for the first meeting of the Japan Working Group. I
will endeavour to phone each of you prior to the meeting to discuss your
thoughts on the Working Group, including what you want out of your
participation in the Group. I will be in E Power's office in Tokyo this week
if you would like to contact me. I look forward to speaking with you and to
the meeting later this week.

Nick O'Day


>From: "Continental Airlines, Inc."
><Continental_Airlines_Inc@coair.rsc01.com>
>Reply-To: "Continental Airlines, Inc." <eservice@coair.com>
>To: quelnunes@HOTMAIL.COM
>Subject: OnePass Member continental.com Specials for Raquel Thomas
>Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 19:55:03 -0800
>

Raquel Nunes Thomas

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

Continental_Airlines_Inc@coair.rsc01.com Mon, 07 Jan 2002 19:55:40 -0800
Received: from [66.35.193.86] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBE03B700009C4004378E4223C1569B9941; Mon, 07 Jan 2002 19:54:23 -0800
Received: from sc8-a7-omp4.rsc01.net (10.40.1.61) by SC8-A7-OMP4.rsc01.net (PowerMTA(TM) v1.5); Mon, 7 Jan 2002 19:54:12 -0800 (envelope-from <Continental_Airlines_Inc@coair.rsc01.com>)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 19:55:03 -0800
From: "Continental Airlines, Inc." <Continental_Airlines_Inc@coair.rsc01.com>
Reply-To: "Continental Airlines, Inc." <eservice@coair.com>
Subject: OnePass Member continental.com Specials for Raquel Thomas
X-cid: ca.170
To: quelnunes@HOTMAIL.COM

=20

<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D=22Content-Type=22 CONTENT=3D=22text/html; charset=3Diso=
-8859-1=22>

<BASEFONT FACE=3D=22Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif=22 SIZE=3D=222=22>

<map name=3D=22logo=22>
<area alt=3D=22continental=2Ecom=22 COORDS=3D=220,0,212,43=22 href=3D=22htt=
p://continentalairlines=2Ersc01=2Enet/servlet/cc4?JHEVBU*jNLsgNgLlQavzf6beE=
8vf*a*UA=22>
</map>

	=09

Tuesday, January 8, 2002

<MAP NAME=3D=22icons=22>
<AREA SHAPE=3D=22rect=22 ALT=3D=22Flight=22 COORDS=3D=222,0,57,61=22 HREF=
=3D=22=23flights=22>
<AREA SHAPE=3D=22rect=22 ALT=3D=22Hotel=22 COORDS=3D=2266,0,121,61=22 HREF=
=3D=22=23hotels=22>
<AREA SHAPE=3D=22rect=22 ALT=3D=22Car=22 COORDS=3D=22129,0,184,61=22 HREF=
=3D=22=23cars=22>
</MAP>=20

Specials for =
Raquel Thomas

</=
table>

<=
IMG SRC=3D=22http://www=2Econtinental=2Ecom/images/shared/sale_gen_button=
=2Egif=22 vspace=3D=2230=22 hspace=3D=2210=22 border=3D=220=22> 	<T=
D>Unwind for Less

Whether it's a tour of the California wineries, an escape to the Swiss Alps=
, or a walk through The Imperial Palace in Tokyo, Continental Airlines gets=
 you there with an additional 10% off select sale fares=2E

Visit continental=2Ecom to purchase your eT=
ickets today=2E

<=
hr size=3D=222=22 width=3D=22225=22 align=3D=22center=22 color=3D=22=230033=
cc=22>

 	Travel Updates

Be sure to check continental=2Ecom before l=
eaving for the airport=2E We=92re looking forward to welcoming you onboard=
=21=20

<=21--  *****************************************************
end third special ********************************** -->

This e-mail includes: This Week's Destinations,  Continental Vacation Offers, Hilton Hote=
ls & Resorts, Doubletree Hotels & Resorts, & Embassy Suites Hot=
els Offers, Westin Hotels & Resorts, Sh=
eraton Hotels & Resorts, Four Points by Sheraton, St=2E Regis, The Luxu=
ry Collection and W Hotels Offers, Alamo Rent =
A Car Offers, National Car Rental Offers=2E

<MAP NAME=3D=22hubs=22>
<AREA SHAPE=3D=22polygon=22 ALT=3D=22Cleveland=22 COORDS=3D=2254,6, 51,22, =
1,17, 4,3=22 HREF=3D=22=23cleveland=22>
<AREA SHAPE=3D=22rect=22 ALT=3D=22Houston=22 COORDS=3D=2262,2,107,21=22 HRE=
F=3D=22=23houston=22>
<AREA SHAPE=3D=22polygon=22 ALT=3D=22Newark=22 COORDS=3D=22210,5, 206,20, 1=
17,16, 120,1=22 HREF=3D=22=23newark=22>
</MAP>

This Week's Destinations</f=
ont>=20

Depart Saturday, January 12 and return on either Monday, January 14 or T=
uesday, January 15, 2002=2E Please see the Terms a=
nd Conditions listed at the end of this e-mail=2E

For OnePass members, here are special opportunities to redeem miles for
travel to the following destinations=2E As an additional benefit, OnePass
Elite members can travel using the miles below as the only payment
necessary=2E

To use your OnePass miles (as listed below) to purchase continental=2Eco=
m Specials, you must call 1-800-642-1617=2E There will not be an additional=
 =2420 charge when redeeming OnePass miles for continental=2Ecom Specials t=
hrough the toll-free reservations number=2E

If you are not using your OnePass miles, purchase continental=2Ecom Spec=
ials online until 11:59pm (CST) Friday at
www=2Econtinental=2Ecom=2E
You can also purchase continental=2Ecom Specials for an additional cost of =
=2420
per ticket through our toll-free reservations number at 1-800-642-1617=2E</=
p>

Round-trip travel may originate in eith=
er city=2E

F=
rom/To Cleveland

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Chicago, IL (Midway only)

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24119 - Manchester, NH

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - New York/Newark (Newark only)

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24129 - Tampa/St=2E Petersburg, FL

Fro=
m/To Houston

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24139 - Albuquerque, NM

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Austin, TX

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Baton Rouge, LA

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24119 - Birmingham, AL

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24139 - Boston, MA

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Brownsville/South Padre Island, TX

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Corpus Christi, TX

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Dallas/Ft=2E Worth, TX (Love Field only)
=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - El Paso, TX

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24129 - Indianapolis, IN

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Jackson, MS

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24129 - Jacksonville, FL

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24119 - Kansas City, MO

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24119 - Louisville, KY

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24119 - Lubbock, TX

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - McAllen /Rio Grande Valley, TX

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24119 - Midland/Odessa, TX

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Monroe, LA

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24129 - Montrose, CO

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24129 - Nashville, TN

=2429 + 17,500 Miles or =24169 - Oakland, CA

=2429 + 17,500 Miles or =24169 - Orange County/Santa Ana, CA

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Pensacola, FL

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24129 - Tampa/St=2E Petersburg, FL

=2429 + 15,000 Miles or =24149 - Tucson, AZ

From=
/To New York/Newark

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24139 - Ft=2E Myers, FL

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Hartford, CT

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24139 - Houston, TX  (Intercontinental/Ellington)<=
br>
=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Indianapolis, IN

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24129 - Jacksonville, FL

=2429 + 17,500 Miles or =24189 - Los Angeles, CA

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Manchester, NH

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Providence, RI

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Raleigh Durham, NC

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Rochester, NY

=2429 + 10,000 Miles or =24109 - Savannah, GA

=2429 + 12,500 Miles or =24129 - Tampa/St=2E Petersburg, FL

Co=
ntinental Vacation Offers=20

5,000 OnePass Bonus Miles Just for Skiing=21

Enjoy the best of Colorado's white powder during ski season=2E Book a ski p=
ackage for 5 nights or longer and you can earn 5,000 OnePass Bonus Miles=2E=

For more information about this exciting offer, visit continental=2Ecoolvacations=2Ecom=2E

continental=2Ecom Specia=
ls from Hilton Hotels and Resorts, Doubletree Hotels and Resorts, and Embas=
sy Suites Hotels

The following rates are available January 12 =96 January 14, 2002 and ar=
e priced per night=2E Cities listed are for the nearest airport, not necess=
arily for the location of the hotel=2E To book this week's special rates fo=
r Hilton Family Hotels, visit and book at www=
=2Ehilton=2Ecom/en/hi/promotions/valuerates/=2E

Austin, TX

Hilton Austin North - =2499

Embassy Suites Hotel Austin-Arboretum - =24139
=20

Boston, MA & Manchester, NH

Hilton Dedham Place, Dedham, MA=2E - =24139
=20

Cleveland, OH

Hilton Garden Inn Cleveland Airport - =2479
=20

Dallas, TX

Hilton Garden Inn Las Colinas, Irving, TX=2E - =2479/Night, 1/12-13

Hilton Dallas Parkway, Dallas, TX=2E - =2465
=20

Fort Myers, FL

Hilton Marco Island Beach Resort, Marco Island, FL=2E - =24159
=20

Hartford, CT

Hilton Hartford - =24129
=20

Houston, TX

Hilton Houston Westchase and Towers - =24149
=20
Hilton Houston Hobby Airport - =24109
=20

Kansas City, MO

Hilton Garden Inn Independence, Independence, MO=2E - =2459
=20

Los Angeles & Orange County, CA

Hilton Port of Los Angeles/San Pedro, San Pedro, CA=2E - =24119

Hilton Irvine/Orange County Airport, Irvine, CA=2E - =24149

Embassy Suites Hotel Los Angeles-Downey, Downey, CA=2E =24129

Doubletree Guest Suites Santa Monica, Santa Monica, CA=2E - =24189

Embassy Suites Hotel Buena Park-Located Near Disneyland Park and Knott's Be=
rry Farm, Buena Park, CA=2E - =2494

Embassy Suites Hotel Los Angeles-Intl Arpt=2E South, El Segundo, CA=2E - =
=24129

Doubletree Club Orange County Airport, Santa Ana, CA=2E - =2499
=20

Nashville, TN

Embassy Suites Hotel Nashville-Airport - =24119
=20

New York, NY & Newark, NJ
Hilton Pearl River, Pearl River, NY=2E - =2485/Night, 1/12-13

Hilton Fort Lee at the George Washington Bridge, Fort Lee, NJ=2E - =24109
Hilton Newark Gateway, Newark, NJ=2E - =24209

Doubletree Club Suites Jersey City, Jersey City, NJ=2E - =24149
=20

Oakland, CA

Hilton Garden Inn Livermore, Livermore, CA=2E - =24109

Hilton Garden Inn Mountain View, Mountain View, CA=2E - =24189

Hilton Newark/Fremont, Newark, CA=2E - =24147
=20

Pensacola, FL

Hilton Sandestin Beach Golf Resort & Spa, Destin, FL=2E - =24129
=20

Raleigh/Durham, NC

Hilton Durham - =2499

Tampa, FL

Hilton Clearwater Beach Resort, Clearwater, FL=2E - =2499

Tucson, AZ

Hilton Tucson East - =2459

Embassy Suites Hotel Tucson-International Airport - =2459

Special rates apply only for the dates listed at each hotel and are subj=
ect to availability=2E Check hilton=2Ecom for specific dates at each Hilton=
 Family Hotel=2E Or call 1-800-774-1500 and ask for Value Rates=2E Restrict=
ions apply to these=20
rates=2E

continental=2Ecom Specials =
Last-minute Weekend
Rates from Westin Hotels & Resorts, Sheraton Hotels & Resorts, Four=
 Points by Sheraton, St=2E Regis, The Luxury Collection and W Hotels=

Visit our site for booking these and other Last-Minute Weekend Rates for=
 this weekend January 11 - January 15, 2002=2E =
promo=2Estarwood=2Ecom/csco

California

Millbrae - The Westin San Francisco Airport - =24110=2E00

Pleasanton - Four Points by Sheraton Pleasanton - =2456=2E00

San Francisco - The Westin St=2E Francis - =24130=2E00

San Rafael - Four Points by Sheraton San Rafael - =2489=2E00

Santa Clara - The Westin Santa Clara - =2477=2E00

Sunnyvale - Four Points by Sheraton Sunnyvale - =2459=2E00

Connecticut

Danbury - Sheraton Danbury Hotel - =2475=2E00

Stamford - The Westin Stamford - =2477=2E00

Stamford - Sheraton Stamford Hotel - =2477=2E00

Windsor Locks - Sheraton Bradley Airport Hotel - =2489=2E00

Florida

Clearwater Beach - Sheraton Sand Key Resort - =24129=2E00

Orlando - Sheraton Studio City Hotel - =2475=2E00

Orlando - The Westin Grand Bohemian, Orlando - =2465=2E00

Tampa - Sheraton Suites Tampa Airport - =2485=2E00

Illinois

Arlington Heights - Sheraton Chicago Northwest - =2459=2E00

Chicago - Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers - =24129=2E00

Chicago - The Westin Michigan Avenue Chicago - =24136=2E00

Chicago - W Chicago Lakeshore - =24155=2E00

Chicago - W Chicago City Center - =24139=2E00

Elk Grove Village - Sheraton Suites Elk Grove Village - =2471=2E00

Oakbrook Terrace - Four Points by Sheraton Oakbrook - =2458=2E00

Rosemont - Sheraton Gateway Suites Chicago O'Hare - =2471=2E00

Schiller Park - Four Points by Sheraton Chicago O'Hare Airport - =2479=2E00=

Indiana

Indianapolis - Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel and Suites - =2476=2E00
=20
Indianapolis - Four Points by Sheraton Indianapolis East - =2449=2E00

Indianapolis - The Westin Indianapolis - =2487=2E00

Kentucky

Lexington - Sheraton Suites Lexington - =2469=2E00

Massachusetts

Danvers - Sheraton Ferncroft Resort - =2489=2E00

Eastham - Four Points by Sheraton Eastham Cape Cod - =2484=2E00

Framingham - Sheraton Framingham Hotel - =2484=2E00

Hyannis - Sheraton Hyannis Hotel - =2479=2E00

Leominster - Four Points by Sheraton Leominster - =2477=2E00

Needham - Sheraton Needham Hotel - =2484=2E00

Newton - Sheraton Newton Hotel - =2489=2E00

Wakefield - Sheraton Colonial Hotel and Golf Club Boston North - =2470=2E00=

Waltham - The Westin Waltham Boston - =2490=2E00

Missouri

Kansas City - Four Points by Sheraton Kansas City Country Club Plaza - =245=
9=2E00

New Hampshire

Manchester - Four Points by Sheraton Manchester - =2465=2E00

Nashua - Sheraton Nashua Hotel - =2479=2E00

New Jersey

East Rutherford - Sheraton Meadowlands Hotel and Conference Center - =2499=
=2E00

Edison - Sheraton Edison Hotel Raritan Center - =2475=2E00

Elizabeth - Four Points by Sheraton Newark Airport - =2477=2E00

Iselin - Sheraton at Woodbridge Place Hotel - =2471=2E00

Morristown - The Westin Morristown - =2465=2E00

Mt Arlington - Four Points by Sheraton Mt Arlington - =2468=2E00

Parsippany - Sheraton Parsippany Hotel - =2470=2E00

Piscataway - Four Points by Sheraton Somerset/Piscataway - =2475=2E00

New York

New York - The St=2E Regis - =24450=2E00

New York - Sheraton New York Hotel and Towers - =24169=2E00

New York - Essex House  A Westin Hotel - =24228=2E00

New York - The St=2E Regis Club at the Essex House, New York - =24299=2E00 =

Niagara Falls - Four Points by Sheraton Niagara Falls - =2458=2E00

Rochester - Four Points by Sheraton Rochester Riverside - =2467=2E00

Ohio

Independence - Four Points by Sheraton Cleveland South - =2452=2E00

Wickliffe - Four Points by Sheraton Cleveland East - =2464=2E00

Rhode Island

Providence - The Westin Providence - =24156=2E00

Warwick - Sheraton Providence Airport Hotel - =2469=2E00

Tennessee

Nashville - Sheraton Music City - =2462=2E00

Texas

Dallas - Sheraton Suites Market Center - =2464=2E00

Dallas - Sheraton Dallas Brookhollow Hotel - =2449=2E00

Dallas - The Westin Galleria Dallas - =24110=2E00

Fort Worth - The Westin Beechwood Ft=2E Worth - =2464=2E00

Frisco - The Westin Stonebriar Resort - =2474=2E00

For complete details on these offers, please refer to the terms and
conditions below=2E

conti=
nental=2Ecom Specials from Alamo Rent A Car
=20

Rates listed below are valid on compact class vehicles at airport locati=
ons only=2E  Other car types may be available=2E Rates are valid for rental=
s on Saturday, January 12 with returns Monday, January 14 or Tuesday, Janua=
ry 15, 2002=2E

=2426 a day in:  Albuquerque, NM (ABQ)

=2420 a day in:  Austin, TX (AUS)

=2424 a day in:  Hartford, CT (BDL)

=2418 a day in:  Birmingham, AL (BHM)

=2419 a day in:  Nashville, TN (BNA)

=2423 a day in:  Boston, MA (BOS)

=2420 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE)

=2418 a day in:  Dallas, TX (DAL)

=2426 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)

=2418 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH)

=2420 a day in:  Indianapolis, IN (IND)

=2426 a day in:  Jacksonville, FL (JAX)

=2420 a day in:  Los Angeles, CA (LAX)

=2418 a day in:  Kansas City, MO (MCI)

=2426 a day in:  Chicago, IL (MDW)

=2426 a day in:  Pensacola, FL (PNS)

=2424 a day in:  Providence, RI (PVD)

=2418 a day in:  Raleigh-Durham, NC (RDU)

=2426 a day in:  Ft=2E Myers, FL (RSW)

=2420 a day in:  Savannah, GA (SAV)

=2420 a day in:  Orange County, CA (SNA)

=2426 a day in:  Tampa, FL (TPA)

=2426 a day in:  Tucson, AZ (TUS)

To receive continental=2Ecom Specials discounted rates, simply make adva=
nce reservations and be sure to request ID =23 596871 and Rate Code 33=2E B=
ook your reservation online at:
www=2Ealamo=2Ecom or contact Alamo at 1-800=
 GO ALAMO=2E

If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed, A=
lamo offers great rates when you book online at: www=2Ealamo=2Ecom

For complete details on these offers, please refer to Alamo's terms and conditions below=2E

co=
ntinental=2Ecom Specials from National Car Rental

Rates listed below are valid on intermediate class vehicles at airport l=
ocations only=2E  Other car types may be available=2E Rates are valid for r=
entals on Saturday, January 12 with returns Monday, January 14 or Tuesday, =
January 15, 2002=2E

=2429 a day in:  Albuquerque, NM (ABQ)

=2423 a day in:  Austin, TX (AUS)

=2426 a day in:  Hartford, CT (BDL)

=2420 a day in:  Birmingham, AL (BHM)

=2421 a day in:  Nashville, TN (BNA)

=2425 a day in:  Boston, MA (BOS)

=2430 a day in:  Baton Rouge, AL (BTR)

=2423 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE)

=2421 a day in:  Dallas, TX (DAL)

=2419 a day in:  El Paso, TX (ELP)

=2429 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)

=2421 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH)

=2426 a day in:  Indianapolis, IN (IND)

=2421 a day in:  Jackson, MS (JAN)

=2429 a day in:  Jacksonville, FL (JAX)

=2423 a day in:  Los Angeles, CA (LAX)

=2423 a day in:  Midland/Odessa, TX (MAF)

=2421 a day in:  Kansas City, MO (MCI)

=2429 a day in:  Chicago, IL (MDW)

=2429 a day in:  McAllen/Rio Grande Valley, TX (MFE)

=2421 a day in:  Manchester, NH (MHT)

=2423 a day in:  Oakland, CA (OAK)

=2429 a day in:  Pensacola, FL (PNS)

=2420 a day in:  Raleigh-Durham, NC (RDU)

=2424 a day in:  Rochester, NY (ROC)

=2429 a day in:  Ft=2E Myers, FL (RSW)

=2423 a day in:  Savannah, GA (SAV)

=2423 a day in:  Louisville, KY (SDF)

=2423 a day in:  Orange County, CA (SNA)

=2429 a day in:  Tampa, FL (TPA)

=20

To receive continental=2Ecom Specials
discounted rates, simply make your reservation in advance and be sure to
request Product Code COOLUS=2E  To make your reservation, contact National =
at
1-800-CAR-RENT (1-800-227-7368), or book your reservation online at
www=2Enationalcar=2Ecom=2E  Please enter CO=
OLUS in the Product Rate Code field,
and 5037126 in the Contract ID field to ensure you get these rates on these
dates=2E

If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed, N=
ational offers great rates when you book online at: www=2Enationalcar=2Ecom=2E

For complete details on these offers, please refer to National's terms and conditions below=2E

continental=2Ecom Specials Rules=

Fares include a =2437=2E20 fuel surcharge=2E Passenger Facility Charges, up=
 to =2418 depending on routing, are not included=2E Up to =242=2E75 per seg=
ment federal excise tax, as applicable, is not included=2E Applicable=20
International and or Canadian taxes and fees up to =24108, varying by desti=
nation, are not included and may vary slightly depending on currency exchan=
ge rate at the time of purchase=2E

For a complete listing of rules please visit:=20
www=2Econtinental=2Ecom=2E
=20

=

Terms and Conditions for Westin, Sheraton, Four Points, St=2E Regis, The Lu=
xury Collection, and W Hotels:

promo=2Estarwood=2Ecom

Alamo =
Rent A Car's Terms and Conditions:

 www=2Ealamo=2Ecom

Nat=
ional Car Rental Terms and Conditions:

Customer must provide Contract ID=23 at the time of reservation to be eligi=
ble
for discounts=2E Offer valid at participating National locations in the US =
and
Canada=2E Minimum rental age is 25=2E This offer is not valid with any other
special discount or promotion=2E Standard rental qualifications apply=2E Su=
bject
to availability and blackout dates=2E Advance reservations required=2E
Geographic driving restrictions may apply=2E

If you need assistance please visit www=
=2Econtinental=2Ecom/service=2E

This e-mail message and its contents are copyrighted and are proprietary
products of Continental Airlines, Inc=2E Any unauthorized use, reproduction,
or transfer of the message or its content, in any medium, is strictly
prohibited=2E

View our Privacy Policy=2E

This e-mail was sent to: quelnunes=40HOTMAIL=2ECOM

You registered with OnePass Number: JB911152


We are still together.  But you just wait, there is still time, especially
since I went to church twice yesterday and she didn't want to go at all.
She's a heathen like you.

Jerry W Germany <germanj@basf-corp.com> on 05/14/2001 12:02:05 PM
To: Chris.Germany@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Yo

Have you an your Woman broke up yet.  Normally takes about 2 days after dinner
with us.  Man the meal and company was excellent.  I enjoyed myself greatly.
Especially after you picked up the tab.

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 05/14/2001 10:44:59 AM
To:   wdgermanyjr, Jerry W Germany
cc:
Subject:  Yo

Looks like we are getting another $5,000.00 from the asbestos settlement.
Maybe I should just keep this to myself.  I'm so poor and I need so much.

Don, why don't I mail this other ag exemption to you and you can fill it
out just like the first one you sent in?  What mailing address should I
use?

I'm going to the doctor this afternoon for my allergies.  I hate getting
old.


Please plan to attend an Origination Strategy meeting on Thursday 8/17 at
2:30pm.  We will be meeting with Gil Muhl, Janet Dietrich
and others to discuss customer coverage, deal flow, strategic deals/customers
etc.  I think the meeting is going to held offsite  at either
the Doubletree or Hyatt.

Details to follow.  Let me know if you have any questions.


Kay -

We are selling both the Wheatland and Gleason facilities, so along with the
agreement below, I've attached a letter that we could show potential
purchasers.  Thoughts?

Time is critical, since we are right now in negotiations with purchasers, so
please let me know if I need to forward on to someone else.

Thanks,

Mitch

Kay Mann
11/10/2000 09:56 AM
To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: SWPC Agreement

Thanks for the info.  I'll give it a look.

Kay

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           11/09/2000 06:05 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: SWPC Agreement

Kay -

I've reached a verbal agreement with Westinghouse on the LD issues.  I've
attached a letter outlining the agreement.  Could you review from a legal
standpoint?  Call me with questions.

Thanks,

Mitch


Looks good to me.

	Sara Shackleton
	05/30/2000 08:13 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: vacation

All:   I would like to take the following dates if no conflicts:

(1)  Friday, June 30

(2)  week of July 24 - 28

Please let me know if there is a problem.  Sara


Ben:
Jeff Shankman gave me your name.  I have assumed Jeff's old responsibilities
as head of the natural gas derivatives trading group.  Our broker, EDF MAN,
supplies us with $50 million of margin financing every night.  They are
trying to clean up their books for end of quarter and/or year on Sep 30.
They have asked if we can post the $50 million overnight on the 30th.  We did
this last year as well.   Please advise,
John


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Shanbhogue, Vasant
Sent:	Monday, July 16, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Boots, Kelly H.
Cc:	Kaminski, Vince J; Frantzeskakis, Kyriakos; Dhar, Amitava
Subject:	KMV

Hi Kelly,

here is the writeup on KMV (excluding the charts that were downloaded from KMV and Moody's) prepared by members of the Research Group.

Vasant


FYI
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 07/20/2000 05:42 PM -----

	Jay Epstein
	07/11/2000 01:12 PM

		 To: Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Request of grade(s)

Sara and Paul,

I have received a request for a quote from Inforsa CI, and Chilean company.
They appear to have an excellent balance sheet, but I don't know if we are
set up to trade with Chilean companies.  Paul, the company's information is
available on Bloomberg if you type in INFORSA CI and hit the equity key.  We
are just starting discussions with them, but I wanted to make sure to give
you both advance notice.  Please let me know if there is any additional
information that you need from me.

It looks like it will be at least a month before Singapore Press Holdings
will be ready to do business.  I'll keep you informed as our talks progress.

Thanks,

Jay
---------------------- Forwarded by Jay Epstein/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000 01:06
PM ---------------------------

Bob Crane
07/11/2000 12:33 PM
To: Jay Epstein/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Request of grade(s)

---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Crane/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000 12:32 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Kal Shah                           07/11/2000 09:52 AM

To: Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Request of grade(s)

---------------------- Forwarded by Kal Shah/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000 09:51 AM
---------------------------

jfigueroa@inforsa.cmpc.cl2 on 07/11/2000 09:43:53 AM
To: Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Request of grade(s)

PERSONAL INFORMATION

Name:    Jorge Figueroa R.
Company:   Inforsa
City:  Santiago
nCountry:  Chile
Phone:   56-2-6718972

GRADE:  VOLUME:
------  -------
______________________________________

We have one newsprint mill, with a capacity of 200.000 annual tons.
We are interesting to know about the future market.
In your weekly newsletter you have published newsprint prices(bid/Offer) for
3 and 5 years.
What index are you considering to close this kind of deal (RISI, Miller or
other)?.
It's possible to obtain quote prices for 18 or 24 months.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron on 01/12/2001
10:14 AM ---------------------------

firstcall.notes@tfn.com on 01/12/2001 01:17:14 PM
To: mark.koenig@enron.com
cc:

Subject: UPDATE OF CALIFORNIA CRISIS AND BRIEF NOTES ON DUKE ENERGY
CONFERENCE CALL

                          FIRST CALL RESEARCH NETWORK

10:41am EST 12-Jan-01 Prudential (C.COALE 713-650-4732) DUK DYN ENE REI PCG
UPDATE OF CALIFORNIA CRISIS AND BRIEF NOTES ON DUKE ENERGY CONFERENCE CALL

UPDATE OF CALIFORNIA CRISIS AND BRIEF NOTES ON DUKE ENERGY CONFERENCE CALL
PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES                                   January 12, 2001

SUBJECT: Natural Gas Distr./Pipelines

----- ANALYST(S) --------------------          -------- OPINION --------
M. Carol Coale   713.650.4732                 Current: Strong Buy
David R. Tameron   713.650.4731                  Risk: Moderate

----- HIGHLIGHTS---------------------------------------------------------
Key players in California energy crisis meeting continuing to meet in
Washington
  - nothing material has yet to be finalized.  Our expectations are detailed
within.
1)   Cautioning investors to avoid stocks with California exposure until a
more
longer term solution is decided upon.  However, the lowest risk is likely in
the
cheapest stocks, and DUK may be the best bet over the week or so.  DYN in the
mid-$30s and ENE in the mid-$60s are also attractive.
2)   Duke Energy conference call reiterated that about 90% of California
portfolio is hedged forward with non-utilities or in transactions outside of
the
Independent System Operator (ISO) or Power Exchange (PX).  We estimate Duke's
financial exposure is less than $0.04 per share annually.

-----
DISCUSSION---------------------------------------------------------Thoughts on
California and brief comments on the Duke Energy Conference Call.  Key
representatives of the California utilities, power generators, marketers have
been in meetings in Washington D.C. with the FERC Chairman, Secretary of
Energy,
U.S. Treasurer and members of the Clinton staff.  We have the following
comments on what we believe may be and should be long-term solutions to the
California energy crisis.

What we think will come out of Washington meetings:
1)   Power generators will agree to selling power under long-term (up to 10
year) contracts at the capped retail rates ($65-$75/Megawatt hour (MWh)
assuming
that they can buy gas supply forward.  However that market is very illiquid
and
can take weeks to secure a transaction.
2)   Politicians/legislators want to avoid bankruptcies, but we still think
there is a 50/50 probability.
3)   Utilities likely to be able to buy/sell electricity in forward market.
4)   California is likely to eliminate the Power Exchange (PX) and replace
with
negotiated buy/sell market.
5)   "Forbearance" brings up issues of whether the utility can defer payments
for power supply for a number of periods or whether the state will pick up the
bills.  The impact on the receivables of the power generators/marketers and
lenders is uncertain.
6)   We believe actual seizure of power plants from the unregulated suppliers
by
the state is unlikely, as is the removal of emissions credits (also, we
understand NOx emissions credits can be as high as $46/Megawatt hour in
California).
7)   Resignation of reigning FERC Commissioner Jim Hoecker on 1/18/01 allows
for
Bush-appointed commissioner to step in, most likely to be Republican Curt
Hebert.  Herbert has been vehemently opposed to price caps and supports
competitive markets.
8)   Under a "new FERC", we think there is a low risk of retroactive
repercussions on generators to "give back" past profits on electricity sold in
California last summer, and also that a windfall profits tax on
generators/marketers is unlikely.
9)   Companies such as DUK, DYN and ENE all appear to have less than $0.05 per
share of annual earnings exposure to California generation/marketing sales net
of risk mitigation.  However, recent conversations with Reliant Energy have
revealed that it has not hedged its receivables risk with the utilities in
California.  Typical monthly receivable balances range from $5-$270 million or
up to $0.60 of earnings exposure.  REI is betting on the risk of bankruptcy of
PG&E and Edison is unlikely, and therefore, the cost to set of credit reserves
at this point would more than outweigh potential earnings exposure.
10)  While these stocks, in addition to REI, appear oversold, the stock
performance is likely to be volatile until a solution to the CA energy crisis
is
introduced. In our view, the California market solutions fall short of the big
picture.  I have been cautioning investors to avoid the above-mentioned stocks
until a more longer-term solution is decided upon.  However, the lowest risk
is
likely in the cheapest stocks, and DUK may be the best bet over the week or
so.
Still, DYN in the mid-$30s and ENE in the mid-$60s are also attractive, in our
view.
11)  We expect DYN, DUK, ENE and REI to all report positive 4Q01 earnings
surprises of at least a penny or so, but to the extent that the surprise is
related to power generation, the stocks may not react favorably.

What we think will solve the California problem:
1)   Eliminate all retail rate freezes, and let the market forces balance
supply
and demand.  Higher electricity prices to the consumer will encourage less use
and the purchase of more efficient energy equipment, and will also encourage
independent generators to build new facilities.
2)   We agree with the allowance of forward sales and a free spot market for
unregulated electricity transactions.
3)   A word on the hydroelectric generators.  Most are government-owned
facilities that virtually generate electricity for "free".  It would stand to
reason that the hydroelectric generators (a.k.a. the federal government) has
been financial benefiting from selling "free" power into a market that has
been
marginally priced off of high-priced natural gas.  Shouldn't the government
also
be asked to "share the pain"?

Following highlights from DUK call:
1)   Duke controls or owns 3,300 megawatts of electric generating capacity out
of a portfolio of about 6,000 megawatts.  About 90% of its California
portfolio
is hedged forward with third parties that are not utilities or in transactions
involving the Independent System Operator or Power Exchange.
2)   Duke's receivables "at risk" are not material financially or
operationally,
according to the company.  Duke pointed out that just over 10% of EBIT is
generated from its wholesale energy business, although we estimate it is
closer
to 15%.
3)   Duke has a minimal number of contracts with PG&E and SoCal Ed (EIX
subsidiary).
4)   Nothing material has been agreed upon in the Washington meetings between
industry representatives, legislators and feds, but the likelihood of power
plant seizures and retroactive penalties appear unlikely.
5)   We estimate DUK's annual financial exposure, net of forward sales, is
less
than $0.04 per share annually.

Stocks mentioned in this note include:  Duke Energy (DUK-65 7/8; rated
Accumulate); Dynegy (DYN-39 ?; rated Accumulate); Edison International (EIX-10
r; not rated); Enron Corp. (ENE-69 7/16; rated Strong Buy); PG&E Corp. (PCG-12
5/16; rated Sell); Reliant Energy (REI-32 7/16; rated Hold).

Prudential Securities Incorporated (or one of its affiliates or subsidiaries)
or
its officers, directors, analysts, employees, agents, independent contractors,
or consultants may have positions in securities or commodities referred to
herein and may, as principal or agent, buy and sell such securities or
commodities.
First Call Corporation, a Thomson Financial company.
All rights reserved.  888.558.2500

Note ID: 402321
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       To update your order or to receive research on other companies,
              please call your Account Manager at (800) 262-6000.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Thomson Financial Investor Relations  TEL: 800-262-6000
         75 Wall Street, 18th Floor            FAX: 212-363-3971
         New York, NY  10005                   EMAIL: firstcall.notes@tfn.com

      First Call is a registered trademark of the First Call Corporation


lyris-confirm-99214601E@mail2.southwest.com on 04/03/2000 11:55:51 AM
Please respond to lyris-confirm-99214601E@mail2.southwest.com
To: ebass@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Your confirmation is needed

Thank you for your registration.  Your email address
has been signed up for a subscription to the Southwest Airlines
Internet Specials mailing list.  Your subscription requires a
confirmation that you received this email and would like
to join this mailing list.  The email address you subscribed is:

ebass@enron.com

To confirm that you do want to join, simply reply to this message.
Make sure that your message is addressed to
lyris-confirm-99214601E@mail2.southwest.com
You will receive a notification email that you have been added to
the mailing list.

If you want to unsubscribe from this mailing list, do nothing.
Your email address will be automatically removed.

To unsubscribe from this mailing list immediately, forward this
message to leave-special-offers2-99214601E@mail2.southwest.com
or unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email


I just entered the CES demand charges for August on the following deals

Deal 343896 - East demand charges of $655,443

Deal 231667 - Market East demand charges of $881,995

Thank you Melba


FYI...assignment or capacity release?
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron on 10/12/2000
11:36 AM ---------------------------

"Wadle, Rick" <Rick.Wadle@SouthernEnergy.Com> on 10/11/2000 02:32:56 PM
To: "'Michelle.Lokay@Enron.com'" <Michelle.Lokay@Enron.com>
cc: "Hogan, John" <John.Hogan@SouthernEnergy.Com>

Subject: TW FT Assignments

As per our conversation, please assign TW contracts 24926. 27201 and 27017
to BP Energy effective November 1, 2000.  You may contact Ms. Penny Barry
(281-366-4913)at BP Energy for confirmation.  If you have any additional
questions regarding this assignment, please call me at 678-579-3463.

Thanks for your help

Rick Wadle
Sr. Gas Control Coordinator
Southern Company Energy Marketing


chart distributed to isda
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 02/27/2001 09:33 AM -----

	"Liz O'Sullivan" <LOSULLIVAN@isda.org>
	02/26/2001 01:39 PM

		 To: "'elizabeth.sager@enron.com'" <elizabeth.sager@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Revised Energy Chart

I will include revised Allen & Overy chart in conference package.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard.Tredgett@AllenOvery.com
[mailto:Richard.Tredgett@AllenOvery.com]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 2:05 PM
To: losullivan@isda.org
Cc: Jeffrey.Golden@AllenOvery.com; Thomas.Jones@AllenOvery.com;
Quentin.Pak@AllenOvery.com
Subject: Revised Energy Chart

As discussed, I attach a revised version of the chart for use at the Houston
conference.

Kind regards,

Richard
 <<ISDA European Energy Committee.DOC>>

======================================================================

This email is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the
intended recipient please notify us immediately by telephoning +44 (20) 7330
3000 and requesting the Technology Services Helpdesk. You should not copy it
or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person.

Allen & Overy
One New Change
London
EC4M 9QQ

Tel:+44 (20) 7330 3000
Fax: +44 (20) 7330 9999
General Email: Helpdesk@allenovery.com
www: http://www.allenovery.com

Allen & Overy is a solicitors' partnership.  A list of the names of partners
and their professional qualifications is open to inspection at the above
office.  The partners are either solicitors or registered foreign lawyers.

======================================================================

 - ISDA European Energy Committee.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/19/2000
08:25 AM ---------------------------

RealPlayer News <news@real-net.net> on 06/18/2000 08:55:49 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Get 3D Audio from RealPlayer and RealJukebox!

 - mailtest.html


Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
Email Alert

Midday Market View(TM)
for Wednesday, November 14, 2001
as of 1:00PM EST
Information provided by Schwab Center for Investment Research
and Bridge

U.S. INDICES
(1:00 p.m. EST)

----------------------------------
Market            Value     Change

DJIA           9,793.59    + 42.64
Nasdaq Comp.   1,890.75     - 1.36
S&P 500        1,138.90     - 0.19
----------------------------------
NYSE Advancing Issues        1,722
NYSE Declining Issues        1,257
NYSE Trading Volume        742 mln
NASDAQ Advancing Issues      1,700
NASDAQ Declining Issues      1,615
NASDAQ Trading Volume      1.2 bln

==================================

U.S. TREASURIES
----------------------------------
Value            Yield      Change

6-month bill      1.86%        n/a
5-year note       3.79%    - 15/32
10-year note      4.46%    - 22/32
30-year bond      4.97%    - 26/32

The tables above look best when viewed in a fixed-width font,
such as "Courier."

================================================================

STOCKS MIXED IN MIDDAY ACTION

Stocks were flat to higher following a much better-than-expected
retail sales report and some mildly positive corporate earnings
news. Retail sales for October were higher primarily reflecting
aggressive incentive financing at auto dealerships.

As of 11:52 a.m. EST, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up
0.5%, while the Nasdaq was down 0.1%. The S&P 500 Index was
unchanged. Retail stocks were among the best performers, while
energy-related stocks led the decliners.

Computer and printer maker Hewlett-Packard (HWP,22,f2) posted
fiscal 4Q profits of $0.19 a share, well ahead of the First Call
consensus estimate of $0.08 per share on an 18% decline in
sales. The company cited strength in the performance of its
imaging and services segments as well as storage and PC
products, despite the continued soft computing environment.
Looking ahead, HP said it sees fiscal 1Q margins and expenses to
be flat with 4Q, with slightly lower revenues.

Network-attached storage maker Network Appliance (NTAP,15.56,f1)
reported a fiscal 2Q profit excluding charges of $0.02 a share,
above the Street's breakeven forecast. Including items, Network
Appliance incurred a loss of $0.03 per share on a 25% drop in
sales to $194.7 million. NTAP's CEO said that he expects 3Q
revenues and earnings to be sequentially flat amid a murky
outlook for business demand.

Shares of BEA Systems (BEAS, 16.56,f1) were nearly flat after
the business software maker reported 3Q operating earnings of
$0.06 per share, $0.01 higher than the First Call consensus
estimate on a 2% decline in revenue. The company reiterated its
4Q EPS guidance of $0.06 - $0.07 per share and said new products
were helping to drive sales.

----------------------------------------------------------------

TREASURY AND ECONOMIC SUMMARY

U.S. Treasuries were down, though off of lows reached in the
wake of this morning's retail sales data as stocks backed off
earlier highs. According to the Commerce Department, retail
sales rose 7.1%, boosted by a record 26.4% jump in auto sales,
amid 0% financing incentives at most of the major dealerships.
September's sales figures were revised to a 2.2% decrease from
the previously reported 2.4% decline. Analysts per Dow Jones
Newswires were expecting an increase in October retail sales of
2.5%. Excluding autos, retail sales were up 1.0%, above the
consensus forecast for a 0.4% increase on strength in clothing
stores and building materials sales. Consumer spending remains
the linchpin of economic growth and the strong retail sales
results are somewhat impressive given the backdrop of the recent
terrorist attacks, ongoing retaliatory campaign and waning
employment conditions.

----------------------------------------------------------------

WORLD MARKETS

European markets gave back earlier gains and headed mostly lower
in step with U.S. equity markets. Energy, gas and insurance
issues led the decliners, while travel, metals and manufacturing
were among the advancers. The Bloomberg 500 index was up 0.05%
as of 11:52 a.m. EST. BP Plc (BP, 46) was among noteworthy
energy-related decliners as oil continued to get hammered
following comments from OPEC ministers stating that, without the
support of non-OPEC members (mainly Russia), production cuts
would not effectively boost prices. The euro, after trending
lower against the dollar this morning amid a worse-than-expected
1.0% drop in October German retail sales, firmed to trade higher
as traders booked profits in the greenback.

Jeffrey Reeve, Market Analyst

================================================================

LOGIN to access your account:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start

----------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe or modify your Email Alert customization options,
log in using the link below or copy and paste it into your
browser's address window:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

----------------------------------------------------------------

Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
email system may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed
by Schwab personnel. (0801-11478)

Information provided by Bridge Information Systems.
Copyright 2001 Bridge Information Systems.

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. ("Schwab") is a member of the NYSE,
other major U.S. Securities Exchanges, and SIPC. Schwab is a
specialist in various securities on the Pacific, Boston and
Cincinnati Stock Exchanges and is subsidiary of The Charles
Schwab Corporation, which is listed on the NYSE and trades
under the symbol "SCH". Schwab Capital Markets L.P. is a member
of the NASD and SIPC.

Schwab Capital Markets L.P. is also a subsidiary of The Charles
Schwab Corporation and is a market maker in approximately
4,900 securities.

Schwab Center for Investment Research ("SCIR") is part of
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. The information contained herein is
obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy
or completeness is not guaranteed. This report is for
informational purposes only and is not a solicitation, or a
recommendation that any particular investor should purchase or
sell any particular security. Schwab does not assess the
suitability or the potential value of any particular
investment. All expressions of opinions are subject to change
without notice. The Charles Schwab Corporation, Schwab, Schwab
Capital Markets L.P. and its officers, directors, employees,
consultants and/or members of their families may have a position
in, and may from time to time, purchase or sell any of the
mentioned or related securities including derivatives in such
securities. At any given time, Schwab specialists, or Schwab
Capital Markets L.P. market makers, may have an inventory
position, either "long" or "short" in any security mentioned in
this report as a result of their specialist/market making
functions, respectively. Additionally, Schwab or Schwab
Capital Markets L.P. may be on the opposite side of orders
executed on the floor of the Pacific, Boston and/or Cincinnati
Stock Exchanges or over-the-counter market respectively, as
well. Schwab (or persons related thereto) or consultants may
perform or solicit investment banking or other business from
any company mentioned in this report.
(C)2001 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

1) Schwab Capital Markets L.P. makes a market in this security.
2) Schwab is a specialist in this security.
3) Schwab has managed or co-managed a public offering in this
   security within the last three years.
4) An employee of Schwab is a Director of this company.
5) An analyst covering this stock has an investment position.

This service is for personal use only. Commercial use or
redistribution in any form, print or electronic, is prohibited.

Distribution by Quris, Inc.


This is to inform you that we are rolling out changes to the Gas Daily option
pricing model.  Currently the system is not properly pricing index puts and
calls at locations with gas daily index premiums or discounts (puts and calls
are priced at the same level no matter what the index).  The change will
result in raising call values/lowering put values at locations with index
premiums and the opposite at locations with index discounts.

In addition, index plus/minus option deals (for example index -1.00 puts) -
which are currently incorrectly priced flat to the index option (the index
-1.00 put is priced flat to the index put)- will be accurately priced to
reflect the difference in strikes.

If  anyone has any questions please call me at  3-6731.

Thank You,

Larry May


plauche said that he was definately in.  did you get the rooms yet?  if you
can get two since they are so cheap.  that way we can get girls back easier.


I have sent a reminder.  The EES team has been working around the clock on
California matters, so I'm not surprised that they haven't focusses o this yet

	Mark Schroeder@ECT
	01/31/2001 05:42 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Need to get to closure on Mike Dahlke

Steve - I am concerned that just through inertia, we are not getting rapid
closure on Mike Dahlke's move to a new role.  There is no doubt in my mind
that he can do good service in EES, and he has met with several people
there.  Mike is concerned that he might get stuck, as he apparently was in
1997, in limbo for a long time, which he found very professionally and
personally frustrating and stressful.  Can you help, especially in your HR
capacity?   thanks  mcs


713 303 5973


Click Below for a No-Obligation FREE Debt Analysis!

Are Bill Collectors Hounding YOU?  Are Your Credit Card Bills TOO MUCH?  WE CAN HELP!  Our Non-Profit Credit Card Consolidators can help you reduce your credit card bills and unsecured debt, FREE OF Charge!

Click your No Time Media Coupon link:

http://www.qksrv.net/click-828401-1468084

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://i.pm0.net/remove?notimemedia
* Enter your email address (alewis@ect.enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "notimemedia".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address alewis@ect.enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: alewis@ect.enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>

pmguid:15q.1b54.jx32


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000 08:40 AM -----

	Paul Simons
	08/17/2000 07:33 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lin Richardson/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: FX Transactions

FYI, Sara

Lin - please put on SFA file - thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Simons/LON/ECT on 17/08/2000 13:35
---------------------------

Jon Barrett@MGLTD
07/08/2000 11:34
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FX Transactions

---------------------- Forwarded by Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD on
07/08/2000 11:31 ---------------------------

GILBERGD@sullcrom.com on 06/08/2000 15:45:55
To: jbarrett
cc: RAISLERK@sullcrom.com

Subject: FX Transactions

eSafe Protect Gateway (tm) has scanned this mail for viruses, vandals and
suspicious attachments and has found it to be CLEAN.

File: 62cy01!.DOC (38,400 bytes)
Encoding: Base64
Result: Clean.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Attached is a draft of the memo we discussed on the proposed FX business.
Please call or e-mail with any questions.  Best regards.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - 62cy01!.DOC


Attached is the CPUC Bi-Weekly Update. Call with any questions.

 <<X27655.DOC>>

Jeanne Bennett


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000
12:57 PM ---------------------------

"James Love" <James.Love@msl.redstone.army.mil> on 05/12/2000 12:20:58 PM
To: <Phillip.M.Love@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Excuse Me!

I hope you have a sound card on your computer at work.  If not, send it home.
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 12:15:48 -0500
From: "Ed Dowling" <Ed.Dowling@msl.redstone.army.mil>
To: "James Love" <James#032#Love@msl.redstone.army.mil>
Subject: Excuse Me!
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_D189F9A1.9AFB9FA9"

Edmund A. Dowling
LTC, AR
Product Manager, ATAS
(256) 876-4800
Beeper (800) 374-4434 Pin # 13050

 - Scuse Me!_1.avi


Hey Jeff:

I just saw your email address on the Monmouth web site.  I didn't realized
you were at Mayer Brown.  I don't even know if we've talked since I left New
York (almost 5 years ago).  I'm now in the legal department at Enron Capital
& Trade Resources in Houston where my group is responsible for the legal
issues in derivatives trading here.  I don't get to Chicago often but if they
ever send you down this way, be sure to look me up!

C., F. & S.,

Mark


I called the Committee lawyers and Andy Black and left a voice mail
indicating that you wanted to hear Chairman Barton's views on section 102 and
revenue sharing.

The attached "Good" language is still being worked on, but Dan and I find it
generally acceptable.  The subcommitte print contains the correct pagination
for section 102.

Second Issue:  Linda and I wopuld like you to talk to Sen. Wyden about his
tendency to attack Enron and other marketers given that we have worked with
his office to develop transparency legislation.  I'll discuss with you once
you catch your breath.


I cannot get Geronimo  to be still when I try to put the lead on.  He is just
so happy and active he cannot be still!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


set up a quick (no more than 30 mins) about this with me, nowlan, reck.
thanks.  jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000
09:20 AM ---------------------------

Daniel Reck
11/02/2000 05:15 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: diesel

One of the tranport dot coms has asked if we could post diesel hedges on
their site.  I know we don't (maybe no one does) trade diesel.  But there is
a huge a need for this product in the transport world.  Any thoughts on how
to do this?

--Dan


The objections look good. I have asked our PR dept to comment on the letter
to Harvey. I will get back to you when I have heard from them.

	"Meringolo, Peter" <PMeringolo@brobeck.com>
	11/16/2000 01:58 PM

		 To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: "'msmith1@enron.com'" <msmith1@enron.com>, "'David_Aamodt@pgn.com'"
<David_Aamodt@pgn.com>, "'Mary.Hain@enron.com'" <Mary.Hain@enron.com>,
"'jkeller@enron.com'" <jkeller@enron.com>, "'mday@gmssr.com'"
<mday@gmssr.com>, "Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
		 Subject: Draft Response to CPUC subpoena on behalf of EPMI

Richard,

Attached for your review is a draft of EPMI's objections and responses to
the CPUC subpoena.  Please let me know if you have any questions or
comments.

 <<38#5_02!.DOC>>
Peter P. Meringolo
Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP
Spear Tower
One Market
San Francisco, CA 94105
Main:  (415) 442-0900
Direct:  (415) 442-1285
Fax:  (415) 442-1010

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - 38#5_02!.DOC


L O V E   H O R O S C O P E
+

Sagittarius  Sagittarius

  +

Since every Saj is equal parts idealist and gambler, your relationship should
be very interesting.
You're great pals, marvelous traveling companions, a pair of high-flying,
high-rolling
activist/adventurers. Just come down to earth once in awhile -- or find
someone else to
do it for you. This union requires periodic reality checks. You share each
others ideals, interests
and adventures like no one else can. Both of you like to read, study,
observe, learn and teach.
When you're doing all those things together, life may get exhausting but
never boring.
Travel is part of the glue that holds you together. So here's a warning:
Separate vacations
are a no-no. Each of you is such a wanderer, somebody might not come back --
or remain at home.

by   S T A R   D I V A


Start Date: 3/12/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001031214.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  50.00 / Final:  35.03)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/12/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_LINDER
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  51.37 / Final:  36.37)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/12/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Brian,  Thanks for the camping trip this weekend.  It did help me clear my
mind and sort some things out.  This is a tough time right now, but having
good friends like you will help me get through this.  Thanks again.

The Artist.


Sorry, these are the correct names this time.

Please note that  Helgeland Kraftlag A/L ( CP ID: 51212) name has changed (on GCP - master data) to  HelgelandsKraft AS.

Regards
Paul

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul de Canha/LON/ECT on 08/05/2001 12:15 ---------------------------

	Global Counterparty

Complete workflow history
Submitted by Yumi Takei on 08/05/2001 at 11:01
Allocated to Paul de Canha on 08/05/2001 at 12:03
Completed by Paul de Canha on 08/05/2001 at 12:14. The name change has been made as requested. regards Paul
This request has been rejected  time(s)

	Requestor Details
Request ID	YTAI-4WJC7X
Name	Yumi Takei
Phone	x34708
Group	Documentation - Nordic

	Request Information
Request Type(s)
Required Turnaround Time	2 hours How many hours after you have submitted this request does it need to be completed? The current SLA (Service Level Agreement) for request turnaround is 2 hour(s).  If you require a different turnaround time, please enter your reason(s) here
Completion required by	08/05/2001 12:01
Actual completion time	08/05/2001 12:14
	Request completed 12 minutes later than required time
Completion comments	The name change has been made as requested. regards Paul
Notes	Name change from Helgeland Kraftlag A/L to  Helgeland Kraftlag A/L . Credit to approve via e.mail. All other info remains the same. Thank you

			Counterparty Information
Counterparty Legal Name	HelgelandsKraft AS
Counterparty ID number	51212
Counterparty country	NORWAY
VAT Number / Tax ID	844 011 342 MVA
Registration Number		Headquarters Address 	Registered Address

Norway Power (Financial) for 0167 - Enron Nordic Energy - Norwegian Branch of ECTRIC

Contact type: Confirmation (Add)
Contact name: same as before     Position:
Email:      Phone:      Fax:
Address:

			Beneficiary Bank
			Please fax invoice containing bank details to: 020 7783 8884
Bank Name		SWIFT Code
Account Name		Domestic Bank Key
Account Number		Currency
Bank Address

			Correspondent Bank

Bank Name		SWIFT Code
Account Name		Domestic Bank Key
Bank Address		Currency

Supporting Documentation

Created	08/05/2001 09:41:25 Yumi Takei
Last updated	08/05/2001 12:14:58 Paul de Canha

08/05/2001 12:14:58 Paul de Canha
08/05/2001 12:14:49 Paul de Canha
08/05/2001 11:02:08 Yumi Takei
08/05/2001 11:01:53 Yumi Takei
08/05/2001 11:01:46 Yumi Takei
08/05/2001 10:44:00 Yumi Takei
08/05/2001 10:43:12 Yumi Takei


Needless to say I had a pretty good idea of the location of the bottleneck.
Otherwise, I would have called you.

Peggy Banczak quit.  She told me herself, so it must be true.

ckm

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           04/23/2001 01:18 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: GE contracts

Kay,

I think your memory is correct.  You asked me to get this stuff to Ed, which
I did.

K-

Kay Mann
04/23/2001 12:29 PM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Ed B Hearn
III/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: GE contracts

In speaking with Lee Johnson this am, he mentioned that he is still missing
final contracts for PSCO and CA Development.  I seem to recall that Sheila
had asked someone to pull this together, and that I had given Kathleen the CA
Development stuff.   I could be off track, but that's how I remember it.
There's probably someone with a better memory.

Thoughts?

Thanks,

Kay


KeySpan  Energy may be interested in releasing capacity for June, 2001
and June through September, 2001.

READ THE ATTACHMENT FOR DETAILS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS OFFER.

PLEASE NOTE:
****  FAX ALL BIDS TO ANNE FILAS - (516) 545-5468  ****
***** BIDS DUE ON FRIDAY, MAY 18, BY 12:00 pm, EST  *****

 - 1_Offer1.doc


Please email the signature version of both documents.

Thank you,

Kay

j.nassos@pecorp.com on 06/08/2000 06:50:27 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: j.burns@pecorp.com, gregory_spitzer@chicago.kirkland.com,
dtauke@winston.com, vhedge@winston.com

Subject: Signature page for Assisgnment of Option

Kay -

Attached is the signature page for the Assignment of Option Agreement.  Per
West LB's request, please print out six copies and have each one signed.
When the text of the Assignment is finalized tomorrow morning and acceptable
to Enron, please fax one signed copy back to me at (312) 240-4486.  Please
Federal Express all six originals to me also.  We will send back counterpart
signatures from all parties for your files when completed.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to call (312-240-4413).  Thanks
for your help on this matter.

 <<Assignment of Option Sig Page.doc>>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - Assignment of Option Sig Page.doc


Hi Kathleen,

I'm having difficulty reading parts of paragraphs 15 and 17.  Are these
jumbled on your screen?

Thanks,

ckm

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           01/25/2001 10:34 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: 2001 Form of Option to Purchase

Attached is our new form of Option for 2001.  FYI the following Paragraph was
included in the Illinois Option Agreements, but we did not include in the
North Carolina Options.  We may want to include in others if you think it is
important:

29. Cooperation
Optionors shall cooperate with all reasonable requests of Optionee with
regard to Optionee obtaining all approvals necessary for Optionee to
construct the proposed Project. Optionors shall take no action or make no
public statement which could be detrimental to Optione,s achievement of said
approvals.


Sounds good.