The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude53.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas53.pdf


yeah.  a lot more.  i didn't feel like i needed to carry the conversation.
who is getting married in b.r.?  michelle?


Stephanie and I met with Jeff Dasovich in San Fransisco on Friday.  Jeff understands that he can play an important/strategic role in assisting ENA West Gas in understanding the regulated issues for Gas... There is no doubt that ENA has spent most of our resources in power ( and for good reason) however we need to re focus energy on gas related structures.

To facilitate this effort, Jeff has offered to focus some more of his time and effort on coordinating some of the key commercial issues related to California.  Jane and Stephanie need to create a priority list that represents West Gas issues and "Hot Button" or action items. Once created we can work with Jeff on action items.  In addition to this immediate need, Jeff will join our conference call's/meetings ( or attend where possible).  The next session I have on my calendar is Thurs Sept 5 @ 2:30.

I trust this initiative will further enhance an already effective procedure. If there are any questions, let me know.

regards,

Barry Tycholiz


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/09/2001 02:23 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	07/09/2001 02:16 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Please Take a Look--Draft Slides for Monday Talk in New York on
California Crisis

Yes.  Thanks very much Maureen and Ginger.  There is a subsequent power point
presentation that I'm fairly confident I distributed (may have done so after
I got back from New York, so you might also want to search Steve and Rick's
in-boxes through the first two weeks of February).  Thanks again for the help.

Best,
Jeff

	Richard Shapiro
	07/09/2001 01:46 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Please Take a Look--Draft Slides for Monday Talk in New York on
California Crisis

Was'nt there an earlier powerpoint?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 07/09/2001
01:45 PM ---------------------------

Maureen McVicker
07/09/2001 01:43 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Please Take a Look--Draft Slides for Monday Talk in New York on
California Crisis

HERE'S A DRAFT OF THE EXNET PRESENTATION.  I'LL KEEP LOOKING FOR THE FINAL
VERSION.

----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 07/09/2001 01:42 PM -----
From: Jeff Dasovich on 01/26/2001 12:22 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: skean@enron.com, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Please Take a Look--Draft Slides for Monday Talk in New York on
California Crisis

I've still got considerable work to do, but wanted to make sure all had a
chance to review and comment well in advance of finalizing.  I'm giving a
talk at Exnet on Monday about California.  Attached is a draft of the
slides.  All comments welcome and appreciated.  I'm continuing to work on
it.  Thanks very much.

Best,
Jeff


Dear Vince

I would like to invite you to join me for dinner on October 22, 2001 at 8:30  We will be joined by other respected scholars attending the Strategic Management Conference.  We will be dinning at "The Stinking Rose" on North Beach.

Please let me know if you are able to attend.

Many thanks

Mac


T.J.

Thanks for the picture.  I'm glad you guys like the gift.  Luke looks just
like Rena, huh?

As far as Ricigs goes, I don't have his phone # or address.  I think Moller
does though.
Let me know  if you need his #.  Take care and tell Rena and Luke we said hi.

Kevin


Daren,

FYI.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000 11:48
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           07/11/2000 08:17 AM

To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation
Albrecht #4 Well
Meter 098-4179, Goliad Co., TX

Bob,

Yes, when I typed the original message I had to double check the price as
well.  The request is for IF/HSC and not Gas Daily.

Thank you,
Melissa

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Robert Cotten                           07/10/2000 05:17 PM

To: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation
Albrecht #4 Well
Meter 098-4179, Goliad Co., TX

Melissa,

I have been asked to confirm that the price is Houston Ship Channel Index
rather than Gas Daily?  Please advise.  Thanks.

Bob

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           07/10/2000 02:18 PM

To: Hillary Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation
Albrecht #4 Well
Meter 098-4179, Goliad Co., TX

Hillary,

See below for your answer.

Thanks,
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000
02:17 PM ---------------------------

JoAnne Wagstaff@ENRON
07/10/2000 02:14 PM
To: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation
Albrecht #4 Well
Meter 098-4179, Goliad Co., TX

Melissa,

I have confirmed through emails from Bob Walker that the name of the
counterparty for the Albrecht #4 Well is Coastal Oil & Gas Corp.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
JoAnne
X68228

	From:  Melissa Graves @ ECT                           07/10/2000 10:14 AM

To: JoAnne Wagstaff/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation
Albrecht #4 Well
Meter 098-4179, Goliad Co., TX

JoAnne,

Can you confirm the counterparty name on this please.

Thanks,
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000
10:13 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Robert Cotten                           07/10/2000 10:11 AM

To: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation
Albrecht #4 Well
Meter 098-4179, Goliad Co., TX

Melissa,

Hillary Mack called me about the following deal.  He believes the
counterparty should be Coastal Oil & Gas USA, L.P. rather than Coastal Oil &
Gas Corp.  Please advise.  Thanks.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 10:08
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Robert Cotten                           07/10/2000 09:01 AM

To: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hillary Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amelia Alland/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation
Albrecht #4 Well
Meter 098-4179, Goliad Co., TX

Melissa,

Deal ticket # 325550 has been created and entered in Sitara.

Bob

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           07/07/2000 03:34 PM

To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hillary
Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amelia Alland/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation
Albrecht #4 Well
Meter 098-4179, Goliad Co., TX

Bob,

Per George's note below, HPLC will be purchasing wellhead gas from the
producer listed below for the production month of July.  This production will
be purchased on a "spot" basis and a deal ticket should be created and
entered into sitara based on the following information:

Counterparty    Meter   Volume    Price

Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation  4179, Albrecht #4 Well 7/7/00 - 1,500 Mmbtu/d
        7/8/00 - 3,000 Mmbtu/d
        7/9/00 thru 7/31/00 - 4,000 Mmbtu/d  93% IF/HSC

Additionally, this is a Producer Svcs. deal and should be tracked in the IM
Wellhead portfolio... attached to the gathering contract.

Thanks,
Melissa

------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT on 07/07/2000 03:03
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           07/07/2000 01:11 PM

To: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicente
Sarmiento/GCO/Enron@Enron, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation
Albrecht #4 Well
Meter 098-4179, Goliad Co., TX

Melissa,

Based on the attached Contract Preparation Request for a Spot GTC for the
Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation Albrecht #4 well to be attached behind existing
meter 098-4179 on the Meyersville - West Mission Valley lateral (1130) in
Goliad Co., TX, please enter a deal into Sitara that will generate a spot gtc
for the remainder of the month of July.

For your information:

We expect the following  production at the point named above for the
remainder of the month of July, 2000:

7/7/00 - 1,500 Mmbtu/d

7/8/00 - 3,000 Mmbtu/d

7/9/00 thru 7/31/00 - 4,000 Mmbtu/d

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

Coastal has acquired 3 previously drilled wells subject to HPLC contract
96008903 behind Meter 098-4179 from Sierra 1996 I Limited Partnership and
M.J.G. Inc., as Seller,s Representative for Sierra effective 3/1/2000; the
Legal Department has prepared and is currently circulating a Ratification and
Consent to Assign Document to reflect this transaction.

The spot gtc requested herein will cover gas from the Albrecht #4 well ONLY.
The Albrecht #4 will not be covered by 96008903, nor will the wells currently
subject to 96008903 be subject to the spot gtc.

Shawna, please prepare the Termination Letter for 96008903 as requested.

George x3-6992

---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 07/07/2000
01:04 PM ---------------------------

Debbie Boudar@ENRON
07/06/2000 03:25 PM
To: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicente Sarmiento/GCO/Enron@Enron, Brian M
Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation
Albrecht #4 Well
Meter 098-4179, Goliad Co., TX

In regards to Meter 098-4179 the following information is what I have been
able to determine from the information available to me.

To your questions:

1. Cannot determine who owns this meter.  I will contact Molly Carriere on
Monday when she returns.

2. HPL has a fifty (50) ft. easement at this location which does contain
language for appurtenance rights within the 50'.

3. I pulled the meter file for this location which was prepared during
Project Rock and it does not contain a  Facility Agreement so I am assuming
one was not    located.

Hope this helps.

	From:  George Weissman @ ECT                           07/06/2000 11:09 AM

To: Debbie Boudar/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicente Sarmiento/GCO/Enron@Enron, Brian M
Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation
Albrecht #4 Well
Meter 098-4179, Goliad Co., TX

Debbie,

Meter 098-4179 is located at sta. plus 40+85 on Align. Dwg. HC-1130-18-H in
Goliad Co., TX.  In connection with the Facility Agreement request below, we
need to know the following:

1.  Who owns the meter, HPLC or the operator?

2.  Do we own an easement and an access right of way to the meter station?

3.  Is there, to your knowledge, a Facility Agreement in place covering this
meter?  We cannot locate such an agreement in our records.

Thanks.  George x3-6992
---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000
11:06 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           07/06/2000 09:37 AM

To: Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicente
Sarmiento/GCO/Enron@Enron, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lal
Echterhoff/HOU/ECT@ECT, James R Haden/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation
Albrecht #4 Well
Meter 098-4179, Goliad Co., TX

Shawna,

Attached is a Contract Preparation Request for a Facilities Agreement for the
Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation Albrecht #4 well to be attached behind existing
meter 098-4179 on the Meyersville - West Mission Valley lateral (1130) in
Goliad Co., TX.

Of particular note:

Coastal has acquired 3 previously drilled wells subject to HPLC contract
96008903 behind Meter 098-4179 from Sierra 1996 I Limited Partnership and
M.J.G. Inc., as Seller,s Representative for Sierra effective 3/1/2000; the
Legal Department has prepared and is currently circulating a Ratification and
Consent to Assign Document to reflect this transaction.

We have been unable to locate an existing Facility Agreement for the 3
previously drilled wells and suspect that no such Agreement exists.

The Facility Agreement requested herein is intended to cover only alterations
to be made to existing Meter 098-4179 to install an H2S monitor and necessary
valving to allow HPLC to accept gas from the newly drilled Albrecht #4 well.

Once the H2S monitor has been installed and the Albrecht #4 well is ready to
flow, we intend to paper the purchase of gas from the Albrecht #4 well only
via a spot confirmation pursuant to a spot gtc.  The Albrecht #4 will not be
covered by 96008903, nor will the wells currently subject to 96008903 be
subject to the spot gtc.

Coastal will reimburse HPLC $39,600 for the cost of the installation.

George x3-6992

---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000
09:21 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           07/04/2000 01:28 PM

To: Lal Echterhoff/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Flavin/GCO/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicente
Sarmiento/GCO/Enron@Enron, James R Haden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donnie
McCabe/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Mark Walch/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Steve HPL
Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation
Albrecht #4 Well
Meter 098-4179, Goliad Co., TX

Lal,

We intend to attempt to connect  about 4,000 Mmbtu/d of new production from
the newly drilled Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation Albrecht #4 into the
westernmost end of the Meyerville - West Mission Valley 6" Lateral (1130) on
the Mission Valley System 485 in Goliad and Victoria Counties behind a
existing meter 098-4179.  Coastal intends to add an incremental 1,000 Mmbut/d
each day for four successive days; in May, 2000, the meter flowed about 960
Mmbtu/d of 3.36% CO2 gas.

The content of the Albrecht #4 gas according to the Field Gas Analysis
prepared by Coastal Oil & Gas on 7/1/00:

Nitrogen 0.1124%
CO2  2.7224%
Methane 87.8390%
Ethane  6.1200% 1.628
Propane 2.0682% 0.567
Isobutane 0.3420% 0.111
n-Butane 0.4153% 0.130
Isopentane 0.1269% 0.046
n-Pentane 0.0904% 0.033
Hexanes 0.1634%    0.069
Heptanes Plus 0.0000%    0.000
    2.584

Can HPLC accept this gas?

Pat,

Coastal has verbally advised that the Albrecht #4 well contains more than
HPLC's permissible H2S content at the wellhead; the Albrecht #4 H2S content
is similar to that of the three wells currently producing 960 Mmbtu/d behind
meter 098-4179, the Miller-Albrecht Unit #1-A and the Hoff Heller Gas Unit
#1A & #2D.  Coastal further purports that for some time now it (and/or its
predecessor, MJG, Corp.) has treated these three wells for H2S in a manner
sufficient to reduce the H2S content delivered into HPLC to permissible
levels.  Coastal has further indicated that it intends to reduce the H2S
content of the Albrecht #4 to permissible levels before delivering same to
HPLC.   In your opinion, should Coastal be forced to install an H2S monitor
for this new gas prior to flowing same to HPLC?

George x3-6992

---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 07/04/2000
12:48 PM ---------------------------

Christy Sweeney
06/29/2000 04:56 PM
To: Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, JoAnne Wagstaff/NA/Enron@Enron, Heidi Withers/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Transport Request for Coastal Albrecht #4, Goliad County, TX

Lisa,

Attached is our Physical Well Connect form, including a Transportation Quote
Sheet, for the Coastal Albrecht  #4 well in Goliad County, TX.  Please
provide us with a Transport Quote.  I have attached below a quote you gave us
in April 2000.  The volume is now 5,000/day.

I am headed that way with a map that shows the well's location in relation to
us, Tejas, Koch, and Tetco.  Please note 2% fuel.

Thank you!!!

Christy
39050

---------------------- Forwarded by Christy Sweeney/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000
02:46 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lisa Hesse                           04/07/2000 10:48 AM

To: Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heidi
Withers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: MJG, Inc. meter 4179 and Cokinos Meter 9676

 Brian,

Here are the transport rates for the below meters:

MJG Meter 4179 3.39% co2 1 year Quote April 00
Rel: 1180 avg. 1200-1988  .014
loc.     .05
P/l Density     .02
Quality      .049
Market Adjustment   .05
     ____
     ..183
less discount and market fee  .02
     ____
     .16

Please call if you have any questions or comments.  lisa 3 5901


I have a reception that evening (coincidentally with another Rice group --
from the engineering school), so I will not be able to attend.

	Jaime Gualy@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	11/27/2000 05:48 PM

		 To: Abhijeet Naik/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Alhamd
Alkhayat/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrew Miles/NA/Enron@Enron, Becky
Bruce/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brian O'Rourke/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Brian_Spector@enron.net, Danielle Saadia/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David Dye/HOU/EES@EES, David
Maskell/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ding
Yuan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Kiani/HOU/EES@EES, John
Walt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelli Little/NA/Enron@ENRON,
mary.alison.bailey@enron.com, mcisner@ect.enron.com, Marilyn Baker/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mark Courtney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Micha
Makowsky/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Michelle
Juden/HOU/EES@EES, Patrick Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pearce W
Hammond/Corp/Enron@Enron, Pushkar Shahi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Wheeler/HOU/EES@EES,
Savita Puthigai/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Gim/NA/Enron@ENRON, Traci Warner/Enron
Communications, zachary.sampson@enron.com, Aamir Maniar/NA/Enron@ENRON, John
Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trey Cash/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jason R
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Brad Alford/ECP/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Enron Sell Weekend

Rice recruiting team,

As some of you are aware, Enron is sponsoring  sell weekends (Dec 1 and Dec
8) for all the candidates that have received offers.  The Rice team is
organizing a dinner for the Jones School candidates this Friday evening (Dec.
1) at Tony Ruppe's.  I am looking for 5 to 8 Enron Jones School recruiters to
attend the dinner on Friday.

Please let me know if you will be able to attend.

Thanks,
Jaime
5-8141


See attached file for updates.

Kate,
I have not seen the corrected prices for 566424.1 and 566426.1 come through
yet - maybe tomorrow.
Deal 573862.1 .2 @ $107 your sheet has $168.45  please advise which price is
correct
Deal 578856.1 21 @$150 your sheet has $182.92  please advise which price is
correct

Let me know if you need further clarification.

Thanks
Brooklyn
713.853.1909


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Weekly Priority Mtg./Raetta

Date:		3/15/2001
Time:		9:30 AM - 10:30 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Richard,

Are you up for lunch today?

Brad


I am currently running SQL Uploader for LB 1 upload. You may find Zoom
running slow.
Thanks
-JR


As winter approaches and the possibility of inclement weather, I want to
remind you of the process we have in place to notify you if the office will
be closed or have a delayed start.

You are encouraged to call 398-7000, 398-7200 or 398-7700 for an announcement
regarding the closing of the office.  Every attempt will be made to have this
announcement in place no later than 6:30 AM.

We will also attempt to contact the following radio stations:

  KFAB  1110 AM
  KKAR  1290 AM
  KQKQ  98 FM

to have them broadcast an announcement.  As you are probably aware, we have
experienced difficulty reaching the radio stations in the past so please call
one of the numbers listed above if you don't hear an announcement on the
radio.


Hey:
I just want to confirm the trades I have in your book.
Trade #1.  I sell 4000 X @ 4652

Trade #2. I buy 4000 X @ 4652
  I sell 4000 X @ 4902

Trade #3 I buy 4000 X @ 5000
  I sell 4000 F @ 5000

Net result: I have 4000 F in your book @ 4902.
Thanks,
John


Hi there,

I'm thinking of working out after work - hopefully kind of early.  Ok with
you?  I should still be home before 730.

Michael took Bronco to school.  I'm sure he will have him at the CC.

Kay


We'll need the headcount for commercial people and I know Legal want their assistants.  Hire them as contractors through an agency

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Slone, Jeanie
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:54 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: two additional headcount

Not sure if we had room in the 12 open positions or if we were able to add headcount at this point (I believe we added an admin spot in legal).  I will verify with David.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:43 PM
To:	Slone, Jeanie
Subject:	RE: two additional headcount

Where do we get the headcount room from?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Slone, Jeanie
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:25 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	two additional headcount

Louise,

The following  employees currently working on the floor but have not received offers from UBS and are still on the estate payroll

Amy Shewster (sp?)-receptionist.  She is needed not only to direct and answer calls but for security purposes.
Jessie Villareal-clerk/runner.  Jessie is the only clerk on the floor and is apparently filling a very vital role.  T Jae Black (power), Ina Rangel (gas) and Liz all agree that we need him long term.

We have two options:
1.  Leave them on estate payroll and ask for them to be seconded to UBS for a period of time
2.  Give them UBS offers-I would need to do this tomorrow morning in order to get in before deal close.

Let me know what you would like to do.  Thanks much.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001
05:01 PM ---------------------------

"Kleindorfer, Paul" <kleindorfer@wharton.upenn.edu> on 03/08/2001 03:41:21 PM
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc: "'mcrew@andromeda.rutgers.edu'" <mcrew@andromeda.rutgers.edu>
Subject: Invitation to the 20th Annual Rutgers Conference

Vince:

For two decades now, I have been a member of the faculty helping to organize
the Eastern Conferences on Regulation and Competition that Michael Crew of
Rutgers has chaired.  This year will be, in fact, the 20th anniversary
conference and a number of notable personages will be joining us to celebrate
what we have learned and what we haven't about the economics of network
industries.  Fred Kahn, Al Philipps, Bill Hogan and a number of other
distinguished academics will be reviewing our progress and the prospects for
the future.  The conference will take place at a beautiful site in the
Poconos, about 90 minutes north of Philadelphia, from Wednesday afternoon May
24th to Friday afternoon May 26th.  You can check for yourself the nature of
the program and the conference site/hotel at the following website URL:

http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~crri/WS.htm

Michael Crew and I would both be delighted if you would be willing to be an
after dinner speaker on Thursday evening (May 25th), just before the key
research reviews of Friday morning take place on the electricity, telephone
and gas industries, and following a day of special topics on emerging power
markets and other developments in network industries.   Naturally we would be
pleased if you would be able to stay for the entire conference, but knowing
your schedule, you may only have time for a part of it.  That would not be a
problem.  The usual after-dinner address is for 30 minutes, followed by a
short Q&A period.

Your presentation would help to underline the tremendous importance of Enron
in driving the development of new risk instruments to assist in price
discovery and efficient risk management for market participants, in energy
markets and more generally.  Both Michael and I feel that your perspectives
on the "new science of risk management" and what can be expected from it
could be a very important addition to this special anniversay event.

Please let me know (and please do copy Michael on your response) whether your
schedule will allow your participation in this very special event.  Michael
and I would, of course, be very happy to follow up with you in discussing the
nature of the presentation, participants and so forth, if this is a go.  I
look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Paul
Paul Kleindorfer
215 898-5830


$ * $ * $ * $ * HOTWEBCASH * $ * $ * $ * $

Find out who your match could be...

Click Here:
http://r1.adversend.com/?u=308&l=5&id=4199108

 AOL Users Click Here

Thanks,
$ * HOTWEBCASH * $
http://www.hotwebcash.com

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
 * To be removed from this mailing list, click here:

http://www.adversend.com/u/?l=hotwebcash&e=kevin.presto@ubswenergy.com

AOL users click here to unsubscribe

OR...

 * Reply to this email with the word "remove" as the subject.

This message was sent to: kevin.presto@ubswenergy.com

X-Adversend-Recipient: kevin.presto@ubswenergy.com
X-Adversend-Userid: hotwebcash
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


Josh Borden
5073 Gaviota Ave.
Encino, CA 91436
joshious@yahoo.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,
Josh Borden
Encino, California

Josh Borden


Effective January 1, 2002, the standard mileage rate has increased to 36.5 cents per mile.  As you request reimbursement for personal mileage, please use the rate of 36.5 cents per mile.

If you have any questions, please contact Bruce Martin at 713-345-1833.


How can I get info on deals we've done to you?  Jeff


Please let me know if you never received.  I had this hand delivered to you
on Friday.  ss

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Performance Reviews

Sara - did you ever have a chance to go back and see if you could open this
feedback form with the info filled in or find a completed version on your
computer?  I only have 2 feedback forms on Lynn.  It would be a great help if
you were able to re-send your feedback to me to help get a complete picture.

Thanks,
Cullen

Sara Shackleton@ECT
11/28/99 10:29 AM
To: Cullen Duke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Re: Performance Reviews

Attached is my feedback.  Sara

	Cullen Duke @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	11/19/99 02:48 PM

Sent by: Norma Chavez@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
To: Sara Shackleton@ECT
cc:
Subject: Performance Reviews

Dear Sara:

Attached is a feedback request form for Lynn Aven.  Your input on this
individual's performance is important in the performance review process.
Please complete the attached feedback form and return by Dec. 1.  (Note that
there is a performance review committee meeting on this individual the
following week.)

You may return the completed form to me or my assistant, Norma Chavez, by
e-mail or in hard copy format to me via interoffice mail at 3AC1478.  Please
be assured that your response will be kept strictly confidential.

Thanks for your assistance,
Cullen Duke


---------------------- Forwarded by Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron on 01/31/2001
03:13 PM ---------------------------

"chi nguyen" <chi325@hotmail.com> on 01/31/2001 02:29:32 PM
To: Diana_Sanchez@enron.net, LLam21@hotmail.com, Dudley@ceimail.com,
s_trevino25@hotmail.com, erin@tisd.net, SaraG@houston.rr.com,
sahar3@hotmail.com, julsvu@hotmail.com, mqdo@yahoo.com, sarahmyu@hotmail.com,
Lomani26@CS.COM, VUSTA@AOL.COM, lcampbel@enron.com, bobaymon@aol.com,
sy@telescan.com, yellonero@aol.com, grace0706@yahoo.com, mluu219@hotmail.com,
pon_v@email.msn.com
cc:

Subject:

>From: "Tran, Yen" <YenT@Palacios.k12.tx.us>
>To: "Blackwell, Teresa" <TeresaB@Palacios.k12.tx.us>, "Erdelt, Mary
>Kathryn" <MaryE@Palacios.k12.tx.us>, "Erdelt, Andy"
><AndyE@Palacios.k12.tx.us>, "Fiorini, Cathy" <CathyF@Palacios.k12.tx.us>,
>"Huffman, Yvette" <YvetteH@Palacios.k12.tx.us>, "'chi325@hotmail.com'"
><chi325@hotmail.com>
>Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:24:11 -0600
>
>
>
> > > Subject: Proof
> > >
> > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > > Recently, at a theological meeting in Rome, scholars
> > > > > > > had a heated debate on this subject. One by one, they
> > > > > > > offered their evidence:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > THREE PROOFS THAT JESUS WAS MEXICAN:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. His first name was Jesus
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2. He was bilingual
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3. He was always being harassed by the authorities
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But then there were equally good arguments that.......
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > JESUS WAS BLACK 1. He called everybody "brother"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2. He liked Gospel
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3. He couldn't get a fair trial
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But then there were equally good arguments that.......
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > JESUS WAS JEWISH
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. He went into His Father's business
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2. He lived at home until he was 33
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3. He was sure his Mother was a virgin, and his Mother
> > > > > > > was sure he was God
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But then there were equally good arguments that.......
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > JESUS WAS ITALIAN
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. He talked with his hands
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2. He had wine with every meal
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3. He used olive oil
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But then there were equally good arguments that.......
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > JESUS WAS A CALIFORNIAN
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. He never cut his hair
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2. He walked around barefoot
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3. He started a new religion
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But then there were equally good arguments that.......
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > JESUS WAS IRISH
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. He never got married
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2. He was always telling stories
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3. He loved green pastures
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But perhaps the most compelling evidence.........
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > THREE PROOFS THAT JESUS WAS A WOMAN ......
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. He had to feed a crowd at a moment's notice when
> > > > > > > there was no food
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2. He kept trying to get the message across to a bunch
> > > > > > > of men who JUST DIDN'T GET IT
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3. Even when He was dead, He had to get up because
> > > > > > > there was more work for him to do
> > >

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


I KNEW this would happen.  We have an Internet 101 class here at work
that I'm going to have to sign Eric up for.  Eric, maybe you'll have to
get ahold of our little Cozumel travel planner . . . what was his name??
You idiot.  Maybe we had better let Jen do it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [SMTP:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 11:49 AM
> To: matt.gillaspie@brentonbank.com
> Cc: Eric.Gillaspie@enron.com
> Subject: Re: FW: A Little Story
>
>
> Sounds like your little cousin is continuing to strike out on the
> airline
> tickets.  It really breaks my heart to see the once great web master
> fall
> so far. Maybe we should have assigned him the task of color
> coordinating
> his pants and shirts for the trip.
>
>


Please see short message below from Evelyn Metoyer in confirms.

Kysa M. Alport
Enron North America
503-464-7486

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Metoyer, Evelyn
Sent:	Thursday, June 28, 2001 7:48 AM
To:	Alport, Kysa
Subject:	RE: Tradespark Fees

Kysa,  Yesterday Tradespark told me that they are now charging a flat fee of $10.00 for all daily (1-2 days) deals.  I just want to make sure Chris Mallory is aware of this and he approves.

Thanks
Evelyn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alport, Kysa
Sent:	Tuesday, June 26, 2001 4:22 PM
To:	Metoyer, Evelyn
Subject:	RE: Tradespark Fees

Are you all squared away with Tradespark fees?

Kysa M. Alport
Enron North America
503-464-7486

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Metoyer, Evelyn
Sent:	Tuesday, June 26, 2001 8:14 AM
To:	Alport, Kysa
Subject:	Tradespark Fees

Hi Kysa,

Can you please ask Chris Mallory what the fees are for the Tradespark deals because they are saying all deals are $.01 and we show $.0075..

Thanks
Evelyn


Felicia,  Does this sound right to you?  Just wanted to confirm.  Thanks.
Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 07:48
PM ---------------------------

HThomas@gspcorp.com on 11/01/2000 07:19:00 PM
To: michelle.cash@enron.com, david.oxley@enron.com,
peter.del.vecchio@enron.com
cc: david.howe@enron.com, fran.mayes@enron.com
Subject: Privileged and Confidential communication to my attorneys

     Michelle and Peter, we (GSP) have determined that we are not a federal
     government contractor.  Based on feedback from GSP employees, we do
     sell newsprint to printers who print material for the federal
     government, but we are a 'second-tier' contractor, not a 'first-tier'
     contractor.  (Pat McCarthy, the local employment law attorney that I
     have been using, used these terms when David Howe and i talked to him
     today.)  Pat informed us that second-tier contractors do not have to
     abide by all the federal government requirements for contractors.

     Based on this, GSP does not plan to file EEO-1 reports or prepare
     affirmative action plans.  In addition, we do not feel that we are
     subject to an OFCCP audit.

     Michelle, since you left me the voicemail telling me that we are not
     included in the Enron EEO-1, i assume that also means that Enron's
     status as a government contractor does not force us to prepare EEO-1
     and AAPs.

     Please advise us if you feel we have made incorrect assumptions on any
     of this.

     Hoyt


Janette:

Please also note that we will need to move the printer currently located in
Marianne's cubicle to the litigation war room on 5.  Thanks.

Richard


This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:

  Message-id:
   <57CC9797F54E5D4FA03E0604EC630A38088227@NAHOU-MSAPP01S.corp.enron.com>
  Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:21:42 -0500
  From: "Panus, Stephanie" <Stephanie.Panus@ENRON.com>
  To: sanforchuckie@aol.com, trajjen@yahoo.com
  Subject: Mom's funeral expenses

Your message has been successfully delivered to the following recipients:

  Recipient address: mr1drfl@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net
  Reason: Message accepted by the message store

 - C.DTF
Return-path: Stephanie.Panus@enron.com
Delivery-receipt-to: "Panus, Stephanie" <Stephanie.Panus@ENRON.com>
Disposition-notification-to: "Panus, Stephanie" <Stephanie.Panus@ENRON.com>
Received: from sims-ms-daemon by sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net
 (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9)
 id <0GLE00H01L4ZTD@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net>; Thu,
 18 Oct 2001 08:22:11 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mta3.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta3-pr.rcsntx.swbell.net)
 by sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net
 (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9)
 with ESMTP id <0GLE00FUAL4W6A@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net> for
 mr1drfl@sims-ms-daemon; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:22:08 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from postmaster.enron.com ([192.152.140.9]) by mta3.rcsntx.swbell.net
 (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9)
 with ESMTP id <0GLE00C5NKW1RJ@mta3.rcsntx.swbell.net> for
 mr1drfl@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:16:49 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from corp.enron.com (nahou-msmsw02p.corp.enron.com [192.168.110.109])
 by postmaster.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/external_corp-1.08)
 with ESMTP id f9IDLg301872 for <mr1drfl@swbell.net>; Thu,
 18 Oct 2001 08:21:42 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com (unverified)
 by corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1)
 with SMTP id <T56ab4f85d3c0a86e6d6e0@corp.enron.com>; Thu,
 18 Oct 2001 08:21:42 -0500
Received: from NAHOU-MSAPP01S.corp.enron.com ([172.24.192.197])
 by nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Thu,
 18 Oct 2001 08:21:42 -0500
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:21:42 -0500
From: "Panus, Stephanie" <Stephanie.Panus@ENRON.com>
Subject: Mom's funeral expenses
To: sanforchuckie@aol.com, trajjen@yahoo.com
Cc: mr1drfl@swbell.net
Message-id: <57CC9797F54E5D4FA03E0604EC630A38088227@NAHOU-MSAPP01S.corp.enron.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed ; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C157D7.D39FC2F3"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Mom's funeral expenses
Thread-Index: AcFX19OOp7ztklt5TIu+ZTOaqxzHqg==
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Oct 2001 13:21:42.0818 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[D3ECC820:01C157D7]

------_=_NextPart_001_01C157D7.D39FC2F3--


Paul,

As we discussed in our recent phone call, my recommendation is to attend
the course, because the level of detail will be far greater than we in the
Customer Relations department can provide. I have tentatively reserved a
conference room at the Power Control Center for 4 pm, on Oct. 15th if you
are able to make it. I've also invited  F. Francis to join us. Please let
me know if you will be able to meet at 4pm, or some later time.

Also, I spoke with Juan Padron this morning and firmed-up our plans for
Frank and I to visit you in Houston on the 10/22. We will plan to be in
Houston for whatever hours are convenient to meet with you and Juan on that
day. I suggested to Juan that if there are any issues that you would like
us to address during the visit, just let us know ahead of time so that we
may prepare.

Thanks,
Dave

                    Paul.D.Thomas@
                    enron.com            To:     IMCEANOTES-devanoski+40nyiso+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com
                                         cc:
                    09/28/2001           Subject:     Virtual Bidding Course
                    09:55 AM

Dave,

I have signed up for Virtual Bidding course in Albany for October 16.  I
was wondering if would be worthwhile to attend to course since you and
Frank are coming to Houston the next week.  Basically, do you think that
you can give us the same information that the course would while you are
here?  Please let me know.

Thanks,

Paul D. Thomas
Enron Wholesale Services
East Power Trading
(713) 853-0403

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


FYI -
I will send you an update about SCE and other CA bills impacting renewables shortly.
*****
Calif Renewable Pwr Plant Owners Fight Edison Bankruptcy
Updated: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 02:00 PM ET
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--A bankruptcy proceeding for Edison International's (EIX </investments/quotes/?symbol=EIX>, news </investments/news/?symbol=EIX>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=EIX>) regulated utility subsidiary, Southern California Edison, would have severe negative consequences for the renewable energy community and for all Californians, an association of small, independent power producers in the state said.
The Renewable Energy Creditors Committee said it was responding to media reports that other creditors are on the verge of forcing Edison into bankruptcy.
"Such a filing would raise the cost of doing business in California for years to come," the group said in a press release. "Those who finance bonds to carry out capital improvements will place risk premiums on California projects, if it is demonstrated through the bankruptcy of both of the state's largest utilities that default on debt is an acceptable option."
Members of the Renewable Energy Creditors Committee have already seen their costs of financing projects rise due to the continued uncertainty over more than $400 million in back payments that Edison owes committee members, the group said. For months, some committee members have been unable to pay some creditors and have faced increasing costs of debt.
The committee called on state leaders to work out a financial alternative in the special session expected to be called by Gov. Gray Davis.
In March, several members of the Renewable Energy Creditors Committee came close to initiating an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding against Edison, but a key court decision and the movement of some funds to the generators staved off the move.
"The committee will not take action for now to force Edison into bankruptcy as long as a legislative solution to take care of back payments and encourage the use of renewable energy remains possible," the press release said.
The Renewable Energy Creditors Committee is comprised of wind, solar, geothermal, biomass and landfill gas generators across California. Its members produce 3,000 megawatts of energy, enough to supply electricity to approximately 3 million homes. The committee members represent the vast majority of Edison's renewable energy supply, but they also provide electricity to PG&E.
-By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com <mailto:mark.golden@dowjones.com>


I was asked to forward this to you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas on
03/15/2000
10:06 AM ---------------------------

KIM NOVSEK BIZIK
03/15/2000 09:58 AM

To: Doug Kinney/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Brian
Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Capacity Offer

Doug and Brian,  can you forward this to Chris Germany.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Novsek Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas on
03/15/2000 09:57 AM ---------------------------

afilas@keyspanenergy.com on 03/15/2000 09:51:09 AM
Please respond to afilas@keyspanenergy.com

To: lverona@hess.com, jschiavi@hess.com, Sharonbaker@williams.com,
Michael_Jessup@vapower.com, Duane_Blackowell@vapower.com,
Darren_Angerman@transcanada.com, Mccarwh@texaco.com, Johns00@texaco.com,
Carlnunziato@southernenergy.com, Vincent.tennariello@pseg.com,
Tjcrupi@papl.com, Bryan.Frey@gen.pge.com, CSB@ptrcom.com,
Tracey-Barnett@PerryGas.com, Kholub@PCEnergy.com, CFrezza@NUI.com,
NAU87@aol.com, JBurgess@Noblegas.com, GBBarth@njng.com, SILBER2D@KochiND.com,
SandyRengel@engageenergy.com, Tony.Muscarello@CESOURCE.com, JTOZZ@aol.com,
CKROG98@aol.com, JFoard@Coral-energy.com, KMLI@Dynegy.com, CJWA@Dynegy.com,
MarkG@Cook-Inlet.com, Rob.Gennarini@conectiv.com, MAOtters@utilicorp.com,
pegarner@duke-energy.com, maureen.smith@enron.com, dmueller@sempratrading.com,
tracy.wood@pgees.com, tcampo@njne.com, supply@castlepower.com,
sjfuel@mindspring.com, saulh@econnergy.com, rperez@allenergy.com,
rdauria@reliantenergy.com, quartiersm@nmenergy.com, pbaratz@totalnrg.com,
mnaeser@naenergy.com, metroenergy@worldnet.att.net, mcasas@statoilenergy.com,
marci.mansfield@pgees.com, lsmorris@MetromediaEnergy.com, Kim Novsek
Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, kmgorden@duke-energy.com,
jneubauer@naenergy.com, jlupdale@metromediaenergy.com,
jgarofalow@castlepower.com, jbutkus@UtiliCorp.com, james.breslin@pseg.com,
intenergy@aol.com, energon@aol.com, cruikshankk@conedsolutions.com,
clombardi@advanix.net, ceine@aol.com, cbender22@aol.com,
tkain@worldnet.att.net, jcrowley@sempratrading.com
cc:
Subject: Capacity Offer

Attached is a capacity offer being made by Brooklyn Union of New York
(formerly Brooklyn Union).

If you experience any difficulty opening the attached file, or have any
questions pertaining to the offer, please call me at (718) 403-2981.

All bids must be faxed to  (718) 643-6306 no later than the specified
date on the attachment.

 - Offer


Please let me know why my VAR is $2.2 million.  My position is 108.3 short, so I need to know why the VAR is so large .  Hunter would like an answer as soon as psossible.

Thanks


Any GCP adjustments will be highlighted in red.

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_Enron Networks)

From: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/06/2001 05:42 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: EOL approvals, 03-06-01

Please see attached.


The eThink Team

Do you know what's included in Enron's Code of Ethics?  Do you know what policies affect corporate conduct?  Ask Sharon Butcher, Assistant General Counsel of Corporate Legal, all your questions about our corporate policies today (June 5) on eSpeak at 10 a.m. Houston time.
Can't make the live event?  No worries.  Go to eSpeak (http://ethink.enron.com/eSpeak/exec/default.asp) now and submit your question.  Sharon will try to answer it during her event and you can read the transcript later.

Stop what you're doing!  Go to the Thinkbank (http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/Thinkbank.nsf/HomePage?OpenPage) now!  Notice anything different?


I will be the first point of contact this weekend for any issue's that may
arise.  You can reach me on my cell 503-969-7634.  If for some reason you are
unable to contact me call Dan at 713-516-2955 or page him 877-342-4551.

Have a wonderful New Year!

Thanks,
Diana


All applications residing on the R: drive will be temporarily unavailable
from Friday, June 22, 2001 at 10:30 P.M. until Saturday June 23, 2001 at 2:30
A.M. for users logging into the CORP domain serviced by Enron Net Works.  The
outage is needed to perform required system maintenance updates and increase
the storage capacity of the general application servers hosting the
applications managed by the Enron Net Works Distributed Application
Management group.

Any questions or concerns regarding this system outage can be directed to
Chris Jeska, (713) 345-7004.

The following have been identified as business critical applications that
will be affected by the outage:

Sitara
CMS
Equity trading systems (eqpm directory)
Adaytum
CQG
TMS
PowerMap Europe
PowerDat Europe
MapInfo Professional
Secretariat


The attached schedule reflects changes due to Karen's departure from our group.

Dennis P. Lee
ETS
Gas Logistics
(713) 853-1715
dennis.lee@enron.com


These are some pictures from Susan and Eric's Wedding.  Excuse the pictures of me and the new car, and of Duke.  It was an all or nothing deal.  I think you can order pics??? I am not too sure!  Hope all is well with everyone---dinner after Christmas?

Kelly :)

Kelly Webb has invited you to see photos at the Walmart.com Photo Center.

Click on the link below to see Kelly's photos. (If clicking on the link doesn't work, try copying and pasting it into your Web browser.)

http://www.walmart.com/agt/bounce.gsp?ID=0528ohtdpzu2eaj3tcq8

We hope you enjoy your visit to the Photo Center, where it's easy to do more with your photos. Create photo gifts such as mugs and mousepads, order high-quality prints and enlargements at our Every Day Low Prices or create your own online albums to save and share your favorite photos.

Best wishes,
Walmart.com
http://www.walmart.com

Do you use AOL?
If you're having trouble getting to the Photo Center, try clicking here.


FYI.  Should be of interest.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/12/2001 10:04 AM -----

DISCRETIONARY LOAD CURTAILMENT PROGRAM

The California Independent System Operator (ISO) has created the
Discretionary Load Curtailment Program (DLCP) to provide additional resources
to the grid for the management of potential system emergency conditions.
This program provides an energy-only payment and gives Loads total control
over their curtailments, the control that many need to feel comfortable
participating in a demand response program.
The DLCP consists of two parts:
? a Day Ahead Request, and
? a Day Of Request for curtailment.
The ISO will pay Load Aggregators $500/MWh for Demand they offer and curtail
in the Day Ahead portion, and $750/MWh for Demand they offer and curtail on
the Day Of portion.
This program will act as an umbrella for certain UDCs, programs under
Assembly Bill AB31x and also attracts any other aggregator that can bid load
curtailments into the program.  A Load Aggregator (LA) can be any company who
enters into a DLCP Agreement with the ISO.  Because AB31x provides payments
for the bundled customers that are aggregated by the UDCs, an alternate
agreement will be made with them regarding procedures of operation.  Non-UDC
Load Aggregators will receive the performance payments from the ISO through
their elected Scheduling Coordinator.
The DLCP will operate year-round during the hours of 7:00AM until 8:00PM from
now until December 31, 2001.  The need for this program will be evaluated
throughout 2001 and implemented for 2002 if needed. Some provisions including
trigger mechanisms and payments may be re-evaluated and changed based on
Summer 2001 experience.
The ISO is accepting proposals from those interested in being a Load
Aggregator, starting on March XX, 2001 and continuing until the end of this
program. For more information and a copy of the Request for Proposals, please
visit our web site (www.caiso.com/clientserv/load) (this will be posted after
the DLCP is approved).
The DLCP is intended to provide the ISO with Demand curtailment from Loads
that may not be able to participate in the ISO,s Participating Load Program
(Ancillary Services and Supplemental Energy) or the ISO,s Summer 2001 Demand
Relief Program.  However, contracted DRP Loads may participate in the DLCP
during months outside of the DRP period. Additionally, existing UDC
interruptible customers that have met their yearly contractual obligation may
participate. This new program is intended to allow end-use Loads to
participate, through a Load Aggregator, in a curtailment program while giving
those Loads total discretion whether to participate in any day the program is
activated by the ISO.

Key Features of the DLCP
Feature
DLCP Availability	March XX, 2001 ) December 31, 2002
Minimum Load Aggregator Portfolio	1MW
Curtailed Energy Payment	Day Ahead: $500/MWh
	Day Of:        $750/MWh
Curtailment Window	7:00 AM ) 8:00 PM
DLCP Request	Day Ahead Request:
	Upon ISO projecting a need for demand response (the ISO may call on this
program based upon the best available temperature, load, and resource
forecast information) for specified hours of the next day.  The DLCP Day
Ahead Request will be issued by 4:00PM
	Day Of Request:
	Upon ISO projecting a need for demand response (the ISO may call on this
program based upon the best available temperature, load, and resource
forecast information) for specific hours on that day.  The DLCP Day Of
Request will be issued by 8:00AM.
DLCP Offer	LAs shall respond to the DLCP Day Ahead Request by 6:00pm of the day of
the DLCP Request.

	LAs shall respond to the DLCP Day Of Request by 9:00AM.
DLCP Confirmation 	The ISO will issue a DLCP Day Ahead Confirmation notice to
the LAs no later than 7:00 PM of the day before the curtailment.

	The ISO will issue a DLCP Day Of Confirmation notice to the LAs no later than
9:30AM of the day of the curtailment.
DLCP Curtailment	The LA shall assure that the Load is notified and curtails in the
hour(s) as per the DLCP Confirmation notice.
Use of Generation	Less than 1MW total behind each interval meter, with approval from
AQMD.
Order / Timing of Curtailment	Because the DLCP Curtailment will be based on the times
identified in the DLCP Confirmation notice the curtailments could occur
irrespective of the Emergency Status.

Eligibility
DLCP Load Aggregator
In order to be eligible for the DLCP, Load Aggregators (including UDCs):
1. Must be able to provide a portfolio that contains a net reduction in
Demand of at least 1MW, either alone or when aggregated with other customers,
2. Must sign a DLCP Agreement,
3. Must have an ISO approved performance measurement process,
4. Must be capable of interacting with the ISO,s DLCP infrastructure as well
as communicate with the end-use Load customer,
5. Must nominate an SC for settlement transactions with the ISO.

DLCP End-Use Load Customer
In order to be eligible for the DLCP, an end-use Load customer:
1. Must be able to provide a net reduction in Demand that meets the criteria
of the LA, or the Local Regulatory Authority,
2. Must have an interval meter approved by the Local Regulatory Authority, or
have the appropriate measuring device(s) as required by the approved LA,s
performance measurement process,
3. Must be located inside the ISO Control Area (ask your LA, if you are not
sure),
4. Must not concurrently participate in the ISO,s Summer 2001 DRP, however
may participate during months outside of the DRP contracted period (May
15-September 30, 2001),
5. If the end-use load is a UDC interruptible customer, the customer may
participate in the DLCP as long as the customer has met all the contractual
obligations of an interruptible customer,
6. Must not have a Participating Load Agreement (PLA) with the ISO for the
same Load offered under the DLCP,
7. Must obtain and provide positive proof of all necessary permits of
operation or approvals from the local Air Pollution Control District or Air
Quality Management District for each individual Generating Unit designated
for participation in the DLCP.

DLCP Process:
? DLCP Request
1. DLCP Day Ahead Request:
The ISO will project the need for demand response. The ISO may call on this
program based upon the best temperature, load, and resource forecast
information available by 4:00PM the day ahead.  The ISO will issue a DLCP Day
Ahead Request by e-mail to all contracted Load Aggregators.  The e-mail
notice will request the curtailment amounts for two-hour blocks within the
ISO specified curtailment timeframe.  The ISO will provide any constraints in
the notice.
2. DLCP Day Of Request:
The ISO will project the need for demand response.  The ISO will base this
projection upon the best temperature, load, and resource forecast information
available by 8:00AM of the day of the request. The ISO will issue a DLCP Day
Of Request by e-mail to all Load Aggregators.  The e-mail notice will request
the curtailment amounts for each two-hour block requested.  The ISO will
provide any constraints in the notice.

? DLCP Offer
1. By 6:00PM on the Day Ahead, the Load Aggregators will submit to the ISO,
through the ISO DLCP website, their committed amounts of Load Curtailment.
The ISO expects that the Load Aggregators will have contacted the End-Use
Loads in their program to determine how much curtailment will be available
and for which hours of the day.
2. By 9:00AM of the Day Of, the Load Aggregators will submit their committed
amounts of curtailment.

? DLCP Confirmation
Once the ISO reviews submitted DLCP Offers, ISO Operations will issue an
e-mail notice to both the Load Aggregators and their Scheduling Coordinators
accepting specific DLCP Offers.  The ISO will issue the DLCP Confirmation
notice by 7:00PM on the day the Day Ahead Request was made and by 9:30AM for
the Day Of Requests. These confirmation notices will request that the Load
Aggregators communicate to the End-Use Loads the required curtailment amount
and duration.  This will be the only communication (dispatch) to the Load
Aggregators detailing the curtailment.
? DLCP Performance
The effectiveness of the DLCP will be based on the performance of each
End-Use Load in curtailing their confirmed curtailment amount. The ISO
expects that the committed curtailment will occur based on the hours as
confirmed through the DLCP Confirmation notices.  An aggregator has the
responsibility to produce the demand reduction it confirms.  There is no set
penalty, except that continued poor performance could result in revocation of
the DLCP Agreement.

? Performance Measurement Guidelines
The measurement of performance for each End-Use Load will be performed by the
Load Aggregators.  Each Load Aggregator will have an ISO approved performance
measurement plan, which will be used to calculate the DLCP performance.  The
performance measurement plan shall include the following:
? For interval metered End-Use Loads the Load Aggregator will calculate a
baseline Load profile.  DLCP performance will be measured by the difference
between baseline Load profile and the meter read for the hour(s) of
curtailment.
? For non-interval metered Loads, DLCP performance will be calculated by
using a combination of sample measurements, historic data, process controls,
use of data loggers, and any other performance measurement method approved by
the ISO.  Load Aggregators shall obtained ISO approval prior to offering DLCP
for non-interval metered End-Use Loads.  (It should be noted that the ISO
favors interval meters.)
? DLCP Settlement
Each DLCP Offer for which a DLCP Confirmation was issued by the ISO shall be
uniquely identified.  Therefore, DLCP Day Ahead and DLCP Day Of offers must
be separately identified. The Load Aggregators (except for the UDCs) shall
submit the DLCP Performance Measurement for each confirmed offer by using the
DLCP website no later than 45 days following the operating day of the DLCP
Curtailment.  The ISO will calculate the performance payment by simply
multiplying the DLCP energy price ($500/MWh for DLCP Day Ahead and $750/MWh
for DLCP Day Of) by the amount of DLCP (in MWs) for each hour of confirmed
curtailment. For each month the performance payments will be summed up for
all the confirmed curtailments and paid to the Load Aggregator,s nominated
Scheduling Coordinator.  The payment will be made to the Scheduling
Coordinator in accordance to the ISO Payment Calendar timeline.
The ISO recognizes that UDCs acting as Load Aggregators will have specific
rules to follow for the settlement of the dispatched curtailment.  The UDCs
will be responsible for following the settlement rules and regulations set
forth by the CPUC for the End-Use Loads.

How to enroll in the DLCP:
Load Aggregator
1. For a Load Aggregator, contact the ISO.  The DLCP Request for Proposal
(RFP) and Agreement are posted on the ISO website:
www.caiso.com/clientserv/load,
2. Contact the ISO.  The ISO contact for the DLCP is:
Glen Perez, Manager Data Quality
California ISO
gperez@caiso.com
3. Submit a proposal and enter into a DLCP Agreement.  Responses to the RFP
should be submitted to:
California Independent System Operator
151 Blue Ravine Road
Folsom, CA 95630

Attention:  John Counsil, Contracts

End-Use Customers
1. Contact a Load Aggregator.  A list of approved Load Aggregators will be
posted on the ISO website: www.caiso.com/clientserv/load,
2. Contact your UDC.  They may have an enrollment process to be followed.
3. Any questions contact the ISO.  The ISO contact for the DLCP is:

Glen Perez, Manager Data Quality
California ISO
gperez@caiso.com


Still here.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:26 PM
To: Seeligson, Stewart
Subject: Hello
Importance: High

 Are you still here?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


Nancy,

Thanks for the wonderful turn around time!

I glanced through the interconnect.  It includes arbitration (poor Dutch) and
equipment outage as force majeure.  Gee, what's good for the goose should be
good for the gander.

Talk to you soon,

Kay


Tana -

I forwarded the BETA to Justin, but I do not have the PA.  If you have a copy
could you please forward it to Justin.

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 02/26/2001 08:50 AM -----

	Justin Boyd@ECT
	02/26/2001 03:07 AM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Legal and Privacy Statement

mark

could you also let me have copies of the PA and ETA for Brokers

Thanks.
Justin

Mark Greenberg@ENRON
23/02/2001 20:27
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Legal and Privacy Statement

Bob -

Attached is the final version of the Legal & Privacy statement for the
website.

Please let me know if you should need anything further.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Here is the matrix for you to expiriment with.

Be careful not to change the formula cells.  I would not save changes that
way you make sure not to kill referenced cells and such.

Smith


Attached are the 2000 Weekly cost reports.  If you have any questions, please
give me a call.  Thanks Amy 3-7805


Look at deals 99663 and 229143 for CNG/Sabine center contract I00059.  We did
this exact setup on several contracts today.

Sylvia A Campos
03/28/2000 04:09 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Capacity Deal tickets

Chris,
Will you have the same contract # and the same Pipeline under Market East
and East in the same month?  If so, this would mean 2 different Global Nos.
and that would create a problem downstream.  Please advise.

Sylvia

Chris Germany
03/28/2000 03:50 PM
To: Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marlene
Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect, Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Crystal Hyde/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Capacity Deal tickets

Effective April 1st, we will have several Transport Capacity tickets set up
under 2 desk, Market East and East.  All longhaul capacity on Tetco, Trco,
and Tenn will be set up under both desk.

All capacity on CNG, Iroq, Equit, Nat Fuel, and CGAS will be Market East.
Now, all of our current capacity on these pipes is either Bug, which goes
away on 4/1, or East.  So even on these pipes you will probably see the same
contract under both desk.

Comments/questions?


I have asked them to work cooperatively with us and to use copiers on other floors or to send out large jobs to the copy center.  Let me know if the situation does not improve.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:44 PM
To:	Aronowitz, Alan; Tweed, Sheila
Subject:	UBS

fyi:	It has come to my attention that Tana/Marie are making constant use of the xerox for copying the ISDA preprinted form, etc.  Is there a standard for outsourcing these jobs?

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Hey,

Just wanted to make sure you're still up for the MFA reception tomorrow night.  I told Lisa about it last night and she said she'd like to go as well.  So...the reception is supposed to start at 7:00 and go until 9:00 and I figured we could either go to an early dinner, or cut out of the reception a little bit early and go to dinner afterward (say around 8:00 - 8:30).  Of course, dinner doesn't have to factor in at all if we don't want it to...just a suggestion.  I'll give you call later tonight to hammer out the details.

See ya,
Susan


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001
11:39 AM ---------------------------

"Scarbeko" <scarbeko@entropia.com.pl> on 01/30/2001 02:35:27 AM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: praca dyplomowa

Dzie? dobry Panie Doktorze,
?

W nawi?zaniu do wczorajszej rozmowy dotycz?cej  min. pracy dyplomowej z
finans?w przesyam swoj? pracc do oceny przez  Pana Doktora. Bardzo bym ?prosi o potwierdzenie dotarcia tej_e pracy do Pana.  Praca jest zapisana w
rozsze_eniu rtf.
?Pod koniec tygodnia postaram dostarczy+  Panu Doktorowi informacji na temat
inwestycji w sektor eneergetyczny na  Ukrainie.
?
Tomasz Bach - V Edycja MBA WSHiFM  Warszawa? - praca dyplomowa T. Bach.rtf


Please find attached translation of the article, "Shares of U.S.-based
Enron Corp. plunge" from Nikkei Kinyu Shimbun dated October 25.

Best regards,
IRJ PR Services


Here are the directions to Dennis and Janice's house Friday night.

Take 45 to Galveston.

You want to exit right onto FM2351.  It's the next  exit after Ellington AFBt.

You will turn left at the second red light onto Hope Village.  Clear Brook
High
School will be on your right after you make the turn.

You will come to a Neighborhood right after the High School.  Take your first
right into the neighborhood.

Next take the second left which is Constitution.  They are a few block down on
the right.  15710 Constitution in Heritage Park II.

Party Time is 6:00 PM.   No gifts, bring a friend if you like.   See you
tomorrow BUB.


Thanks Vince.  This is great.

By the way, did you get copies of the journal with our paper?

John

At 04:59 PM 3/23/01 -0600, you wrote:
>
>John,
>
>No problem.
>I look forward to it.
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 03/23/2001 09:04:44 AM
>
>To:   vkamins@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  Request
>
>
>Vince,
>
>Would you mind making a few luncheon comments to the Texas Finance Festival
>group at our sat luncheon?  I struck out with Andy and Sheridan thought
>that you could relate very well to the group.  How about it?
>
>John
>
>John D. Martin
>Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
>Finance Department
>Baylor University
>PO Box 98004
>Waco, TX 76798
>254-710-4473 (Office)
>254-710-1092 (Fax)
>J_Martin@Baylor.edu
>web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html
>
>
>
>
John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


Here are the P&L file and positions.

I will be on vacation next week, Kam will be covering for me.  Thanks.
PL


Chinese Wall training of one hour has been scheduled on the dates listed
below.  The training is mandatory and allows EWS to continue operating all
its businesses including equity trading without violating the securities laws.

Please register for one of the four one-hour sessions listed below.  Each
session is tailored to a particular commercial group, and it would be
preferable if you could attend the session for your group.  (Your particular
group is the one highlighted in bold on the list below.)

 Monday, March 5, 2001, 10:00 a.m. ) Resource Group
 Monday, March 5, 2001, 11:00 a.m. ) Origination/Business Development
 Monday, March 5, 2001, 3:30 p.m. ) Financial Trading Group
 Monday, March 5, 2001, 4:30 p.m.  ) Heads of Trading Desks

Each of the above sessions will be held at the downtown Hyatt Regency Hotel
in Sandalwood Rooms A & B.  Alterntatively, two make-up sessions are
scheduled for Tuesday, March 13, 2001 at 3:30 p.m. and 4:30 p.m.  Location
information for the make-up sessions will be announced later.

Please confirm your attendance at one of these sessions with Brenda Whitehead
by e-mailing her at brenda.whitehead@enron.com or calling her at extension
3-5438.

Mark Frevert and Mark Haedicke


Are these physical transactions?

	Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
	03/20/2001 04:12 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Coral Energy Holding Deals #550402 & 550229

Hi Tana,
These are the EOL deals that were erroneously entered under Coral Power LLC,
they were actually done with Coral Energy Holding LP
550402:
Buyer:  Coral Energy Holding LP
Seller:  Enron North America
Delivery Point:  NYISO Zone G (HUD VL)
Term:  3/19/01 - 3/23/01, M-F EPT, HE 8-23
Volume:  50
Fixed Price: $54.50
Index:  Hudson Valley NY Zone G

550229:
Buyer:  Coral Energy Holding LP
Seller:  Enron North America
Delivery Point:  NYISO Zone A (West)
Term:  3/16/01 - 3/16/01, Fri., EPT, HE 8-23
Volume:  50
Fixed Price: $37.75
Index:  NY Zone A (West)

Please let me know if you need additional information.
Thank you for your help!
Kimberly Hundl
Power Documentation x31647


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"DeVeny, David" <David.Deveny@Bmo.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:48 AM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	RE:

All four are acceptable counterparties.

-----Original Message-----
From: John.Arnold [mailto:John.Arnold@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:45 AM
To: DeVeny, David
Subject: RE:

How are you with the following counterparties for this transaction: Coral,
Duke, Dynegy, Reliant?

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "DeVeny, David" <David.Deveny@Bmo.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Monday, October 29, 2001 5:23 PM
   To:     'jarnold@enron.com'
   Subject:

   John:

   Bank of Montreal would like to take Enron up on the offer you made this
   afternoon to help balance our short swap exposure with your organization
   and
   replace it with a third party Enron may have offsetting transactions
   with.
   Per our conversation, to offset the contracts that we are short to
   Enron,
   our position would allow us to accommodate the following transactions:

   Buying five and a half (5.5) contracts a day December 2001 (Z01) natural
   gas
   last day swaps from Enron and selling to a third party
   Buying sixteen and a half (16.5) contracts a day January 2002 through
   December 2002 (F02-Z02) natural gas last day swaps from Enron and
   selling to
   a third party
   Buying four (4) contracts a day April 2003 through October 2003
   (J03-V03)
   natural gas last day swaps from Enron and selling to a third party
   Buying two (2) contracts a day January 2004 through December 2008
   (F04-Z08)
   natural gas last day swaps from Enron and selling to a third party

   If you find an appropriate offsetting positions please contact me at
   212-605-1475.

   Thank you,

   David DeVeny
   Bank of Montreal
   Commodity Derivatives Group

****************************************************************************
   This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
   information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
   sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any
   copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other
   than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. Unless
   otherwise stated, opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the
   author and are not endorsed by the author's employer.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

****************************************************************************
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. Unless otherwise stated, opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and are not endorsed by the author's employer.


Have you sent in the sign up sheet yet?  Who is that one person?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Nicole Mendez                           02/16/2001 08:58 AM

To: Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pam Becton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marnie
Lamb/NA/Enron@Enron, Brad Carey/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tammy Barta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Best/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa King/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rosalyn Lum/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rufino
Doroteo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laynie East/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Hardy/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron, Marnie Lamb/NA/Enron@Enron, Kristi
Fredericks/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan Rance/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian K
Dawson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Kang/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Outlook Training

So far I only have one person that would like to attend this afternoon's
class.  Is there anyone else that would like to go?   Please let me know as
soon as soon as possible as I will be sending the sign up sheet for today's
class shortly.

Nicole
---------------------- Forwarded by Nicole Mendez/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 08:56
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Nicole Mendez                           02/15/2001 10:56 AM

To: Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pam Becton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marnie
Lamb/NA/Enron@Enron, Brad Carey/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tammy Barta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Best/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa King/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rosalyn Lum/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rufino
Doroteo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laynie East/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Hardy/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron, Marnie Lamb/NA/Enron@Enron, Kristi
Fredericks/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan Rance/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian K
Dawson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Kang/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Outlook Training

Please let me know if you would like to attend any of the following classes.
I will send in a cumulative list.

Nicole
---------------------- Forwarded by Nicole Mendez/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 10:54
AM ---------------------------

Magdelena Cruz
02/15/2001 09:59 AM
To: Nicole Mendez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Outlook Training

Nicole --

Below are the dates I have available for training:

February 16th  2:30-3:30pm EB564
February 20th  8:30-9:30am EB564
February 20th  1:00-2:00pm EB572
Februarty 23rd  10-11:00am EB572

To register for a class, please email me with the below information:

Class:
Date of Class:
Time:
Your name:
SSN#
Location:
Ext:
Company #
Cost Center
Manager's Name

If you have any questions, please call me.
Thanks,
Maggie
x3-9571 or x3-1816


California,s power crisis has generated heated debate over the last several
months.  Unfortunately, this debate has generated more heat than light.  We
want you to know what the facts are and what we are doing about the crisis.
Please spend a few minutes reading the following overview on the situation
and our position on California energy issues.

What happened in California

The source of California,s current problem is as straightforward as supply
and demand.  California,s economy grew 29 percent since 1998.  This increased
the demand for electricity by 24 percent.  At the same time, regulatory
restrictions prevented new generation from getting built in the state.  So
demand grew but regulations prevented supplies from being added.  The result,
predictably, is a shortage.  This summer, peak capacity will be about 10
percent shy of peak demand, leading to further blackouts in the state.

In addition to the supply and demand imbalance, there are two other related
factors that led to the current crisis.  First, the state,s regulations
forced all sales and purchases into the spot market.  The spot market for
power is extraordinarily volatile.  The way firms behave in a free market
when faced with such volatility is to construct a portfolio of purchases long
term, medium term and short term, to reduce exposure to this volatility.  In
California, state regulation prevented this strategy.  This would be the
equivalent of putting the entire state on an adjustable rate mortgage in the
most volatile interest rate environment imaginable.  Everything was fine
while the power surplus persisted, but when shortages ensued, every megawatt
was purchased at the sky rocketing spot price.

Second, retail markets were not deregulated.  Regulated retail rates remained
in effect, and stranded cost recovery charges were structured to keep
competition out.  This meant that utilities were forced to pay high wholesale
prices in the spot market but were only able to recover costs at the
regulated retail rate.  They are now nearly bankrupt.

In short, California,s problems were caused by regulation, not deregulation.
Regulations prevented competitors from entering the market, prevented new
generation from being built, and prevented prudent hedging against volatile
spot prices.

At the time California was developing its restructuring plan, Enron warned
the state,s policy makers about these risks and proposed alternatives, which,
if adopted, would have averted the current crisis.

Enron,s Role

Many political leaders in the state have elected to fix blame rather than fix
the problem.  Power sellers, including Enron, have been vilified by the
politicians and the media.  Here are the facts:

? Other than a small amount of wind power, Enron is not a generator in the
state of California.  Every megawatt we sold in California we bought in the
same market available to other California purchasers.  Because we are a
market maker, not a generator, we are not biased toward high prices.  We are
interested only in having a market that works so that we can package products
for our customers.
? As a seller to end-use markets in the state, we provided protection from
the problems the states, utilities, and their customers, now face.  We
protected, and still protect, our customers from price volatility.

You may have read that EES recently elected to have the utilities supply
power directly to its customers in California instead of procuring power on
the open market.  Early reports mischaracterized this as a &turnback8 of our
customers to the utilities.  Here are the facts:

? As a result of a variety of factors existing in the current California
market, it made more sense for EES to source power for its customers directly
from the utilities.  This decision reduced EES,s market price risk by
allowing EES to access lower utility rates.
? EES did not terminate any customer contracts, and our customers continue to
receive the financial benefits of their contract prices.
? EES is continuing to work with its California customers to provide them
with other energy-related products and services, including assistance in
reducing the demand for power, particularly at peak times.

Enron is currently proposing solutions to help California work out of its
crisis; Enron continues to sign up customers in the state; and Enron
continues to actively manage its risks and capture opportunities in Western
power markets.  Enron,s primary business is managing risk for our customers
with solutions customized to meet their needs.  There has never been more
demand for our products and services.

The Solution

The solution to California,s crisis is also straightforward.  In summary, the
state must increase supply, reduce demand, reduce reliance on the spot market
and shore up the financial stability of the state,s utilities.

Increasing Supply

California,s process for siting and permitting new generation is nothing
short of Byzantine.  Enron has built plants elsewhere in the country in less
than a year.  In California, it often takes 5 to 7 years.  California simply
must streamline this process.  Ironically, while many of the regulations
generators must overcome are aimed at improving environmental quality, the
regulations are preventing new clean technology from coming online and
displacing current plants, which emit 40 times as much NOx.  California can
have abundant power and cleaner air by expediting the permitting of new
facilities.

Reducing Demand

Customers in California today have no incentive to reduce or shift demand.
They pay the same rate no matter what the market price is.  An open retail
market would trigger demand responses, which would balance supply and demand
at lower prices than today.  California should fully open its retail market.

Reducing Reliance on the Spot Market

In a truly deregulated market, customers would protect themselves from
volatile spot prices by purchasing some of their requirements on a longer
term, fixed-price basis.  The state has instead left procurement in the hands
of the utilities, which it has forced to buy exclusively in the spot market.
Opening the market at the retail level will give customers control over their
price risk.

Restoring the Financial Integrity of the State,s Institutions

The utilities in California are not paying their bills.  This has led to
greater uncertainty in the market, higher costs, and reduced flexibility to
arrive at lasting solutions.  California must permit its utilities to recover
their costs so they can pay their bills and invest in the transmission and
distribution assets necessary to get power from where it is to where it is
needed.

Just as important as doing these things, the state must avoid policies that,
while politically attractive, do not fix the problem or even make matters
worse.  Price caps have been proposed.  They don,t work; have never worked;
and they will not work here.  Price caps succeed only in creating shortages,
which then have to be allocated among competing users.  Imagine how
ineffectively the government would be in determining, for example, whether it
is better to make its limited power supplies available to the Imperial Valley
or Silicon Valley.  Price caps are a surefire way to make the current
shortage worse.

The state has also proposed to take over generation and transmission in
California.  There is no reason to believe, and every reason to doubt, that
the state will be more effective than free markets at investing in,
constructing, operating and maintaining assets.  This will also result in
California tax revenues being spent on power transmission and power
generation -- which the private sector can do -- instead of education, roads
and other public goods -- which the private sector cannot do.

As you are approached by people outside the company or are learning about the
crisis from the media, it,s important for you to know this:  We at Enron will
continue to serve our customers and we will continue to propose real
solutions to the state.


-----Original Message-----
From: Oxley, David
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Kitchen, Louise
Subject: NETCo HR skeleton crew

I tracked back through the HR names to see if I can get to 9. They would be:

Specialists
Neil Davies  - team lead
Kari Oquinn - comp
Tony Garrett - payroll and benefits
Karen Buckley - recruiting, A&A's, training and management reports
Generalists
Jeanie Slone - OTC, Gas Commercial teams, Denver, Mexico, New York
Amy Fitzpatrick - Power Commercial teams, Calgary and Portland
Mandy Curless - IT, Back office and support groups

Me
Julie Clyatt - group admin

Please bear in mind it would be imperative to make sure the following stay in estate for at least 90 days and help us with transition (ie not sure we can do everything we need to with above team):

*Tana Cashion - Generalist
Sarah Zargowski - Generalist
Anne Labbe - Admin
*Julie Kearney - Portland/Calagry HR rep
Charles Philpot - HRIS
Tharsie Broussard - Comp reporting number 2.

Above are names I am suggesting come off list to get to 9.* names are one's ideally I'd like to add back.

David


let's talk this afternoon.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kimberly Brown                           07/10/2000 08:54 AM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fall Class

I would like to know if  I could take a class in the fall from 7:00- 8:15
a.m. ?  I would be in at 8:30 and it would be two days a week .  I would stay
late to make up for that time. Rain comes in at 7:30 and Felecia gets here at
8:00, so the phones would be covered.  Please let me know as soon as
possible, as registration is this week.

Thanks


---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2001
03:58 PM ---------------------------
From: Leslie Lawner@ENRON on 06/01/2001 03:57 PM
To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

These comments on FERC's proposed gas reporting requirements are due on June
18.  The draft takes the position that the FERC should NOT adopt reporting
requirements for natural gas sellers, which is a different approach than some
of you had discussed earlier.  If after reading my very persuasive comments,
the consensus is we should not oppose the reporting requirements but rather
attempt to water them down, I will of course rewrite the comments (or resign
in protest).

On page 6, I make the argument that we do not do our business in the manner
the reporting requirements seem to contemplate.  I go through a very high
level description of our "books," but I really do not want to be more
specific, as we then get into proprietary matters.  Where we have given FERC
the more detailed description, we have asked for confidential treatment.

Please get comments back to me and Becky as quickly as you can.  Thanks.


Please review the attached calendar and advise of any revisions.

Thank you,
Taffy


So hello,

What happened at rehearsal last night?  I did not make it, partly because I
was tired and I had several errands to take care of.  I needed to stop by
K-Mart and the grocery store last night to get things I really needed, and
just did not want to be out late.

Let me know!!!

Talk to you later.

P.S. is everthing else going okay?


We have received numerous requests from individuals in the business units who
either want to add someone to the PRC Committee or who want to have someone
attend the Associate and/or Analyst PRC meetings because they do not have a
representative on the Committees.

Unfortunately, it is not possible to add additional PRC Reps at this time
because all of the Associates and Analysts have been divided between the
existing PRC Reps.  Additionally, as you are aware, the PRC meetings are next
week, December 12th & 13th and there is not enough time to gather
information.  We will, however, be reducing the number of Associates and
Analysts that each PRC Rep is representing and will need several additional
Reps. If you have individuals that should be nominated please send the names
to Terry Bosien.  The parameters that were used for the initial appointments
were as follows:

The person must be a well-respected individual who is nominated/approved by
the Office of the Chair of the Operating Company
The Associate PRC Reps are vice presidents
The Analyst PRC Reps are directors /sr. directors

The level of the PRC reps on the committee is important to adhere to for
several reasons.  First, Jeff wanted individuals at these levels to gain
additional exposure in the organization and be involved in activities beyond
their business unit boundaries.  Additionally, it potentially places the PRC
Rep in an awkward position and they may feel undue pressure in the meeting if
they are required to disagree with a more senior individual.

We have also received request from individuals wanting to "observe" the
meeting.  As in the MD/VP process, individuals are not allowed to just
observe if they are not a part of the Committee.  We attempted to have the
major units represented, however, it is not possible to have every division
represented.   Jeff Skilling spent over an hour with the PRC Reps explaining
why the individuals selected as PRC Reps, rather than the Associates' &
Analysts' managers, should be the ones to represent the Associates & Analysts
in the PRC.  He also reiterated the importance of the PRC Reps'
responsibilities which was to (1) meet with the Associates' and Analysts'
managers;  (2) gather as much information as possible and (3) advocate
objectively for the individual.
Also, if there are too many individuals in the room it is difficult or
impossible to come to a consensus, which has been the case in the past.

I hope this is helpful.  If business units find this is not acceptable, they
should seek approval for their attendance from Jeff Skilling.

Thanks for your understanding, cooperation and support.

Charlene


Outstanding outcome- Ray, this was an incredible result given the challenging
context, to say the least....You should feel quite proud of this achievment-
Thanks!

Linda Robertson
05/14/2001 01:06 PM
To: Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Tariffs Approved

Excellent, and congratulations.

	Ray Alvarez
	05/14/2001 12:34 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Tariffs Approved

The rate case that the governmental affairs group filed in January, on behalf
of Transredes, has come to a very successful conclusion and the new rates
will go into effect towards the end of this month.  The rates are not much
lower than what we filed for, and represent a very significant increase over
the previous rates.  The tariff methodology and revised regulations, put into
effect by the Supreme Decree, were followed to the letter by the regulator
despite political pressure to arbitrarily keep rates down.  The deliverables
here were to (1) obtain a tariff methodology via Supreme Decree that would
make the company finance-able / rescue it from dire financial straits and (2)
file a rate case and prosecute it to obtain hard rates in accordance with the
tariff methodology.  This second deliverable has now been completed.
Transredes has had a bond issue pending since last year due to the
uncertainty about rates; it is my understanding that the financial market
loved the ruling and that Transredes sold $40 million worth of bonds in about
5 minutes!  This ruling should also significantly increase Transredes's
market value, relative to Enron's efforts to sell its interest in the company.

---------------------- Forwarded by Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron on 05/14/2001 11:38
AM ---------------------------

Doug Farmer
05/11/2001 06:09 PM

To: Peter E Weidler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Hansvander.klink@shell.com.br, Hans.h.vanderklink@si.shell.com
cc: Jan van den Berg/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, John
Naphan/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Cyro Camacho/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Pedro
Elio/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Fernando Gonzalez/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES

Subject: Tariffs Approved

Gentlemen,

I am delighted to report that SIRESE approved substantial increases in TR's
tariffs consistent with the Law and Regulation.  The details are :-

     Existing Tariff SIRESE Approved % Increase TR/CLHB Proposed TR/CLHB %
Increase

Gas Export (including surcharges)  $0.18  $0.2205  22.5%  $0.26 (excluding
RG)  44.4%
Liquids Domestic    $1.05  $2.46  134.3%  $3.25    209.5%
Liquids Export     $1.55  $2.31  49%  $3.35    116.1%

CLHB's tariffs were also approved as follows $1.19  $2.20  84.9%  $3.528
196.5%

As you can see we did substantially better than CLHB (comparable with our
liquids domestic) !!

We will get a detailed report on the assumptions used by SIRESE to reach
their conclusions on Monday, but our inteligence suggests the following :-

1. Export gas volumes increased to 100% TR capacity, and 100% GSA + Cuiaba 2
assumed for SDA and TEMIN purposes
2. RG Compresion project deleted
3. Interest rate reduced to 10 or 10.5 % i.e. the rate in our bond issue
4. Liquids expansion in the South reduced
5. Some continuity of service CAPEX reduced
6. Unknown OPEX reduction and maybe a change to the OPEX allocation between
concesions
7. OCC in service date slipped from 2003 to 2004.
8. Debt/Equity assumption changed from 60/40 to 70/30

Our strategy to respond to each of these points is as follows :-

1. Volumes.  Covered by 8% rule, we can blete but can expect little back
here.  Clearly we will appeal if volumes exceed installed capacity in the
short term i.e. 2002/2003.
2. RG Compression - not worth fighting for since we don't even have the
support of BG
3. Interest Rate - We'll get this back when we do a tariff  revision and
actual rates are used.  When we get the detail we will appeal if Jan feels we
have concrete grounds i.e. commision costs etc. are omited.
4. Liquids Expansion in the South.  Here we intend to do a detailed analysis
of exactly what has been deleted and as a result what liquids/gas production
will be shut in.  If possible all assumptions to be agreed with the affected
producers (PB, BG, Vintage and Chaco).  We will then write to those
producers(copy SIRESE , VMEH etc.) stating that on their recommendation the
project scope was reduced by SIRESE.  We will give them an estimate of the
lost liquids/gas production (in both volume and cash terms) resultant from
this decision.  We will tell them that since they proposed these reductions
we have no intention of appealing them but invite them to appeal.
5. Continuity of Service Capex.  We need to see the detail here.  We will
take the moral high ground and be absolutely clear that we are not prepared
to compromise our safety and environmental standards.  We need to see exactly
what has been removed, but my thought is that if that means we are unable to
provide some services (e.g. LPG transportation) or the continued operation of
some liquids laterals, we should write to those producers affected suggesting
that if they wish these services to be continued they need to appeal the
decision.  Again since this is Capex we will get it back in the end on tariff
revisions as long as the expenditure is approved on an annual basis in the
SIRESE budget process.
6. OPEX - need to see the detail on Monday.
7. OCC - will not appeal - we need to do a detailed study to develop an OCC
strategy.
8. Debt/Equity ratio.  Strictly speaking what has been done is in accordance
with the Law/Regulation - the regulation says the maximum allowed equity is
40%.  However, we have very strong grounds to appeal since : a) we are
currently miles away from 60/40 let alone 70/30, b) we can only borrow for
CAPEX (as per bond issue and the policy of all/most banks/lending
institutions) with the case presented in the rate case if we borrow to cover
100% of CAPEX we can easily demonstrate that we are still miles away from
60/40.  We intend to fight this one very hard using all the
external/independant help we can get.

As you are all aware our big exposure with the rate case was that the much
needed substantial increase in liquids tariffs would not be approved and we
would be subjected to some form of arbitary cut.  This has not happened
SIRESE has now approved and hence owns these substantial increases.  Having
got the big hike our job is now to claw back as much as we can from the above
strategy in the full knowledge that the results of these efforts will be much
smaller and hence managable increases.

Attached is an analysis of the individual impacts on the tariff of the above
points and the corporate model using the new tariff with our volume
assumptions (i.e. the worst case).

Regards,
Doug