---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000
03:39 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Guggenheim                           09/06/2000 03:14 PM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackson
Logan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Does your school qualify?

A school either is or it isn't.
> Alabama is.
> Notre Dame is.
> Ohio State is.
> Michigan is.
> Texas is.
> USC is.
> Missouri thinks it is but is not, Minnesota was but is no longer,
> Wisconsin just discovered what the meaning of "is" is, Rice never was
> and Temple will never, ever be.
> We have gathered here to establish what is required to be a college
> football program.
> Mind you, this is more than an empirical hashing of wins and losses.
> Colorado won a national title in 1990 but is not a program; Ohio State
> has not won one since 1968 but is.
> Determining what constitutes a program is tricky business, as much
> about feel and intuition as it is churning out NFL talent.
> Can we whistle your fight song?
> Can mere mention of your school start a bar fight?
> Does your school consider it a moral imperative to keep expanding
> stadium capacity so as to annually lead the NCAA in attendance?
> Do we need a tow truck to haul your media guide from the mailbox to
> the front door?
> If you answered yes, yes, yes and yes to the above, you are likely a
> program.
> You have a far better chance of achieving program status if you tee it
> up in the South, where the "War of Northern Aggression" has provided
> more than four score and seven years worth of motivation.
> When Georgia (program) beat Michigan (program) at Ann Arbor in 1965,
> fans deluged the Bulldogs upon their return to Athens.
> "It was as if we had a chance to go to Gettysburg again," former
> Georgia coach Vince Dooley says of that victory in Tony Barnhart's new
> book, "Southern Fried Football."
> What does it take to make our varsity?
> National titles factor in and tradition is a must, but there is much
> more to it than that.
> A program must go the extra yard.
> Any school willing buy out a head coach's contract, no matter the
> length or the amount, is a program.
> Any school that keeps recruiting a player it can't get just to keep a
> rival school's top recruiter on the case is a program.
> You probably also qualify if:
> * The square footage of your school's weight room is roughly equal to
> that of your town's municipal airport.
> * You think the 85-man scholarship limit is a communist plot.
> * You contribute money to only two sports: football and spring
> football.
> * You publicly support Title IX but privately think it has set your
> boys back 20 years.
> * Hollywood has made a movie involving the program. "Rudy," "Big
> Chill," "Something For Joey," "Everybody's All-American," "The Spirit
> of West Point," "Hold 'em Navy," "The Bear," "Knute Rockne, All
> American," "Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil."
> * Your school annually ranks in the preseason top 10 no matter how
> many starters it has coming back.
> * Your head coach could run for Congress and win in a landslide.
> * They name city streets after your coaches and players.
> * The chief of police keeps mug photos of your players in his top
> drawer.
> * Your head coach leads practice with a megaphone, from a tower.
> * You have a living mascot (UGA, Mike the Tiger, Bevo); although this
> does not guarantee enshrinement (see "Ralphie" at Colorado).
> To what length will you go for your program?
> Will one of your players come off the bench to tackle an opponent
> running free down the sideline, a la Alabama's Tommy Lewis against
> Rice's Dickie Moegle in the 1954 Cotton Bowl?
> * Are you arrogant enough (pay attention here, USC and Notre Dame) to
> keep scheduling top 10 opponents because you believe in your heart you
> are one national television victory from getting back in title
> contention?
> You get program bonus points if you had a coach or player nicknamed
> "Shug," "Bump," "Rip," "Gus," "Bear," "Bubba," "Duffy," "Muddy."
> Notable exceptions: Orin "Babe" Hollingbery at Washington State and
> Texas El Paso's "Cactus Jack" Curtice.
> You are a program if you can overlook your head coach's scandalous
> extramarital affair as long as he defeats Auburn.
> You are probably a program if you've had 10 or fewer coaches in the
> last 100 years.
> Since 1950, for example, Penn State has employed only Rip Engle and
> Joe Paterno, who have amassed a combined record of 421-131-7.
> Penn State is a program.
> Lastly, and this is very important--it can make or break a program.
> Are you willing to accept NCAA sanctions as a reasonable condition for
> winning a national title?
> This factor alone tipped the University of Washington off the program
> fence.
> You are likely not a program if:
> * You produce boatloads of NFL players but can't sell out home games.
> * You sell your tickets to the Rose Bowl when your team is in it.
> * Your marching band is banned from playing at a game but your team
> isn't.
> * You sell your home game to an opponent for financial considerations.
>
> * Your arena is named after a basketball coach, but the football
> stadium is named after a philanthropist.
> * You play in a conference that ends with any combination of the
> letters U, S and A.
> * You play in a domed stadium.
> * Your most famous football player made his name in baseball.
> * You ripped your fight song off from Nebraska and changed the words.
> The list:
> (Program note: If your school is not among the following, you are most
> likely a rat for the NCAA.)
>
> The Programs
> NOTRE DAME: The whole nine yards. Equal parts love, hate, hype,
> history, myth combined now with first-ever NCAA sanctions! They ought
> to make several movies.
> ALABAMA: Bear Bryant left Texas A&M (program) in 1958 to return to
> Tuscaloosa. Asked why, Bear said, "Mama called."
> MICHIGAN: You are a program when your Sept. 16 game at UCLA can be
> written off as a "West Coast recruiting trip."
> NEBRASKA: The "American Gothic" of programs: The media guide cover
> could be a standing shot of a plow, pitchfork, sickle and blocking
> sled.
> TEXAS: It matters not that the Longhorns haven't claimed a national
> title in 30 years, because the eyes of Texas are always upon them.
> Remember, it was Darrell Royal who taught the Wishbone to Bear Bryant.
>
> OHIO STATE: Brigham Young leads Ohio State, 1-0, in national titles
> since 1968, but we're not even checking the Buckeyes' ID at the door.
> Great band, fight song, stadium, uniforms, tradition.
> OKLAHOMA: A former OU president in the Bud Wilkinson era said his goal
> was to build a university to make the football team proud. Slimier
> than crude oil in the days under the bootlegger's son, Barry Switzer,
> otherwise known in Norman as "the glory years."
> TENNESEE: These people are sick. If they don't stop this crazy
> attendance war with Michigan, Neyland Stadium in 10 years is going to
> be taller than the Eiffel Tower.
> PENN STATE: For 50 years, in an isolated hamlet, Joe Paterno has
> dominated opponents, the tube sock industry, genetics, fans and the
> media.
> USC: Hmmm. Hasn't won a national since '78. Hasn't produced a Heisman
> winner since 1981. But, as "Tusk" bandmates Fleetwood Mac put it in
> the banner years: "Don't stop thinking about tomorrow."
> FLORIDA STATE: Only a man of Bobby Bowden's clout could
> single-handedly transform the former Florida State College for Women
> into a program. Phyllis Diller never underwent this kind of face lift.
>
> GEORGIA: UGA! They play ball "between the hedges," bury deceased
> mascots in the end zone, bark like dogs on kickoffs. The women dress
> to the "9s" on game days and the men wear ties. What more needs to be
> said?
> AUBURN: We seek consistency in a program. The 1957 national title team
> under Shug Jordan was not allowed to play in a bowl because of NCAA
> violations. Terry Bowden's 1994 unbeaten squad was bowl-ineligible for
> infractions incurred under Pat Dye.
> MIAMI: Last sentence in our Psych 101 exam paper on the subject: "Not
> even a blip on the program radar screen until the 1980s, when three
> coaches led the school to four national titles with a renegade,
> counter-culture bravado that challenged and pistol-whipped established
> program morays as previously defined by Notre Dame."
> CLEMSON: Years ago a guy hauled a hunk of rock from Death Valley back
> to South Carolina and stuck it in the east end of Clemson Memorial
> Stadium. It is now tradition for players to rub "Howard's Rock" on
> entry to the field.
> This gem is right out of "The Program" handbook.
> LOUISIANA STATE: A program, so help us Billy Cannon. In 1934, Huey
> Long heard sales for a home game were lagging because Barnum and
> Bailey were in town. Long found an obscure state law prohibiting
> animals to be washed on Saturday and canceled the circus.
> MICHIGAN STATE: A tough call, but in the end we invoked our "name"
> clause, which states: Any school that has been coached by a "Muddy"
> and a "Duffy," and had a star player named "Bubba," shall henceforth
> be granted program status.
> FLORIDA: You don't even ask anymore whether the Gators are going to be
> good. Since Steve Spurrier arrived in 1990, you stick Florida in your
> preseason top 10 and go mow the lawn.
> TEXAS A&M: Last year, 12 people died while serving the program.
> ARKANSAS: It didn't hurt that the school's longtime head coach, Frank
> Broyles, made a seamless transition to longtime athletic director.
> Bonus points for playing 1969 "Game of the Century" game against
> Texas.
> ARMY-NAVY: They enter together on a special program furlough. Both
> academies have slipped a bit on the field, but the intensity of the
> annual rivalry game is still Top Gun.
> SYRACUSE: We almost 86'd the Orangeman because they play football on
> fake grass in an aircraft hanger, but two names kept haunting us in
> our sleep: Jim Brown, Ernie Davis, Jim Brown, Ernie Davis. Syracuse
> gets in on a historical pass.
> WASHINGTON: It was more than Don James and a scandal that sealed the
> Huskies' program status. The school was a turn-of-the-century
> powerhouse, winning 39 consecutive from 1908-14.
> BRIGHAM YOUNG: The Cougars qualify under the "Bowden Provision,"
> although BYU probably leans more toward "factory." Still, Coach LaVell
> Edwards has made BYU impossible to ignore. Lord knows we have tried.
> MISSISSIPPI: Faulkner-filled past and Southern charm triumphs over
> recent mediocrity. You tend to forget John Vaught coached Ole Miss to
> three national titles and that Peyton Manning's daddy once starred
> there.
> GEORGIA TECH: Two great "Bobby" coaches--Dodds and Ross--plus a coach,
> John Heisman, who led school in 1916 to a 222-0 drubbing of Cumberland
> College. It was Heisman, the man for whom the trophy is named, who
> quipped, "Better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this
> football."
> MISSISSIPPI STATE: Can you let a school in on the strength of its
> cowbells?
> Yes, and Mooooooooo!
> ARIZONA STATE: We thought of dumping ASU before considering the
> prospect of Frank Kush hopping a plane to L.A. and making the sports
> staff do bear crawls around Parker Center. Yes, the crew-cut Kush era
> is long gone, but ASU bridged the program gap with John Cooper in the
> 1980s and a national title run in 1996. What's more, ASU may be the
> only program that ever created its own bowl game--the Fiesta.
> WISCONSIN: The last school to get with our program, based on the
> strength of Barry Alvarez's remarkable decade: 70-44-4 record, three
> Big Ten titles and consecutive Rose Bowl wins. Wisconsin already had
> in its favor a Grade AAA fight song--"On Wisconsin, On Wisconsin,
> plunge right through that line!"--and the nickname power of Elroy
> "Crazy Legs" Hirsch.
>
> Thinks It Is . . . but Isn't
> UCLA: Just missed the cut (honest). Great uniforms, history, players
> and a share of the 1954 national title, but word is Angelo Mazzone
> hocked UCLA's program rights to Wisconsin for a tidy profit.
> Moreover: a program doesn't rent its home stadium from its archrivals
> for 50 years.
> COLORADO: Earned upgrade stickers for the wild and wayward Bill
> McCartney days, but this remains foremost a skiing school.
> STANFORD: We argued Stanford's case to a national football tribunal.
> Pop Warner, Jim Plunkett, John Elway, we said.
> Judge's response: "The SAT scores are way, way too high to qualify for
> program status."
> ILLINOIS: Once you get beyond the eras, Red Grange and Dick Butkus,
> the name that sticks is Jeff George.
> BOSTON COLLEGE: Under Vatican rules, there are only enough vespers to
> support one Catholic football superpower.
> KENTUCKY: Yes, Bear Bryant went 60-23-5 in Lexington, but here's the
> clincher: At a 1953 banquet, alums awarded Bryant a cigarette lighter.
> Basketball coach Adolph Rupp received a Cadillac.
> KANSAS STATE: Bill Snyder still has a few more atoms to split in
> Manhattan. By our calculations, the Wildcats have to go undefeated for
> the next 14 years to get back to .500.
> NORTH CAROLINA: Mack Brown's Tar Heels went 11-1 in '97, finished No.
> 4 in the coaches' poll, and he left to coach Texas. Why?
> Because Texas is a program.
> ARIZONA: Cannot even be considered by the program veteran's committee
> until the school first appears in a Jan. 1 Rose Bowl.
> OREGON: If this was a program, we wouldn't be concerned about Notre
> Dame (program) air-lifting Coach Mike Bellotti out of Eugene.
> CALIFORNIA: For goodness sakes, the guy ran the wrong way in the 1929
> Rose Bowl and handed Georgia Tech (program) a national title!
> PURDUE: Conclusive factoid: From 1887 to 1978, Boilermakers went to
> one bowl: the '67 Rose.
> WEST VIRGINIA: Had Bobby Bowden. Hung him in effigy. Bowden left to
> coach one-time girls' school in Tallahassee. Wonder what became of
> him?
> IOWA: So, Nile Kinnick won a Heisman Trophy and Hayden Fry had a few
> good years. Anything else?
> SOUTH CAROLINA: Two words: "Chicken Curse."
> OKLAHOMA STATE: Jimmy Johnson, Barry Sanders and a lot of dust.
> OTHER TEXAS SCHOOLS: Texas Tech, Baylor, Houston. Listen up: Playing
> football in Texas does not automatically qualify you for program
> statehood.
> MISSOURI: If this was a program, Tigers would be in the Big Ten by
> now.
>
> Used to Be / Dormant
> GRAMBLING: Turned in program badge and gun the day Eddie Robinson
> retired with his 408 victories.
> PITTSBURGH: Lost our vote when school decided it didn't want to be
> known anymore as "Pitt." Panthers went 55-5-4 from 1913-20, won a
> national title in 1977 and produced Mike Ditka, Tony Dorsett and Dan
> Marino.
> MINNESOTA: One-time dynasty under Bernie Bierman in the 1930s and
> national title winner in 1960, but programs don't play football under
> ceiling lights.
> MARYLAND: Bear Bryant coached one year in 1945, Jim Tatum led Terps to
> a national title in 1953, but it mostly has been Boomer or bust.
> DUKE: Blue Devils played the 1938 regular season without giving up a
> point; have given up lots of points since.
> TEXAS CHRISTIAN: Might go 11-0 this year and not come close to earning
> enough bowl championship series points to qualify for the national
> title game.
> MIAMI, OHIO: Once known as the cradle of coaching, it's now the other
> Miami.
> VANDERBILT: Legendary coach Dan McGugin's 1915 team scored 514 points,
> about as many points as have been scored in the Woody Widenhofer era.
> THE IVY LEAGUE: Princeton played the first game; Yale's Walter Camp
> darned near invented the rules, but the league's decision to
> de-emphasize football and focus on academics were sufficient grounds
> for program deportation.
>
> Extinct
> SOUTHERN METHODIST: It's OK to cheat one's way to program status;
> quite another to cheat one's way off the gridiron map.
> CHICAGO: Amos Alonzo Stagg coached there from 1892 to 1932, but then
> the program went into a depression.
> PACIFIC: Not even two great coaches, Stagg and Bob Toledo, could keep
> this program from the dead lettermen's office.
> FORDHAM: Vince Lombardi cut his gapped teeth here before the budget
> wonks took a wrecking ball to the "Seven Blocks of Granite."
> ST. MARY'S: Post-World War II budget cuts left the once-mighty Gaels'
> flat brogue.
> RUTGERS: Played in the first college football game against Princeton
> but has won only eight games in four years under Terry Shea.
>
> * * *
>
>
> Most National Championships
> * 11--NOTRE DAME
> 1924, 1929, 1930, 1943, 1946, 1947, 1949, 1966, 1973, 1977, 1988
> * 9--ALABAMA
> 1925, 1926, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1973, 1978, 1979, 1992
> * 8--USC
> 1928, 1931, 1932, 1962, 1967, 1972, 1974, 1978
> * 6--MICHIGAN
> 1901, 1902, 1932, 1933, 1948, 1997
> * 6--OKLAHOMA
> 1950, 1955, 1956, 1974, 1975, 1985
> * 6--OHIO STATE
> 1942, 1954, 1957, 1961, 1968, 1970
> * 6--HARVARD
> 1908, 1910, 1912, 1913, 1914, 1919
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.? Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any
action
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.?? If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.


Here is my bracket.  I will bring the money down around 10:30.


I know I already discussed time off at Christmas with you, but I have really
indecisive parents who are divorced and like to do completely opposite things
for the holidays, so I have one modification to make. If I could take off
from Friday, Dec. 22, to Tuesday, Jan 2, then I can accomodate both of my
parents and head off a potentially disastrous fight over which kids go with
which parents. It ends up being two more days off than I had asked for before
-  the 22nd and the 2nd. I'm really sorry to ask for so much time off, but I
wouldn't do it unless my life were going to be in jeopardy if I didn't. Thank
you!

Kate


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/31/2001
10:42 AM ---------------------------
From: Mike A Roberts on 03/25/2001 03:56 PM
To: Kathie Grabstald/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: ENSIDE Draft

Please see attached for my edits

- - - Mike


At the request of Bob Shults, I am enclosing a clean and redlined copy of the
Non-Disclosure Agreement revised to include your comment.  If the enclosed
meets with your approval, please have the agreement executed and return a
copy to me via fax no. (713) 646-3490.  I will then have it executed by Enron
and return a copy to you via fax.


More for the contract...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/15/2001 03:26
PM ---------------------------

stephen.swift@ps.ge.com on 02/15/2001 03:20:48 PM
To: Suzanne.Adams@enron.com, Sheila.Tweed@enron.com, Ben.Jacoby@enron.com,
Lisa.Bills@enron.com, Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com, Scott.Dieball@enron.com,
michael.barnas@ps.ge.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, kay.mann@enron.com,
john.schroeder@ps.ge.com
cc:

Subject: World  Hunger Latest LOL and Indemnity

Sheila,

Here is the latest.  Sorry I missed the call.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Swift, Stephen L (PS, CommOps)
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 12:07 PM
To: 'Suzanne.Adams@enron.com'; Sheila.Tweed@enron.com;
Ben.Jacoby@enron.com; Lisa.Bills@enron.com; Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com;
Scott.Dieball@enron.com; Swift, Stephen L (PS, CommOps); Barnas, Michael
C (PS, Legal); Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE); kay.mann@enron.com; Schroeder,
John H Jr (PS, Sales)
Subject: RE: WEEKLY GE CONFERENCE CALL

Attached is the latest draft of LOL and indemnity.

Talk to you next week.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Suzanne.Adams@enron.com [mailto:Suzanne.Adams@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Sheila.Tweed@enron.com; Ben.Jacoby@enron.com; Lisa.Bills@enron.com;
Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com; Scott.Dieball@enron.com;
Stephen.swift@ps.ge.com; Michael.barnas@ps.ge.com;
Kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com; kay.mann@enron.com; john.schroeder@ps.ge.com
Subject: WEEKLY GE CONFERENCE CALL
Importance: High

THE WEEKLY GE CONFERENCE CALL SCHEDULED FOR TODAY, JANUARY 17, 2001, IS
CANCELLED.

 - WorldHungerMods 2-15-01.doc


Kate what about the Chris Mallory deal?

PREBON
Chris Mallory
I am missing the following deal:
Enron buys from Duke Q2'01 25 mw of NP-15 at $180.00 off-peak hrs

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/27/2001 04:50 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/27 Checkout

PREBON
Matt Motley
562635

Jeff Richter
562556

Jeff Richter
562546 - corrected to 25 mw

BLOOMBERG
Mike Driscoll
562546 - Mike would like to keep this as Pinnacle for now because that is the
true counterparty - Bloomberg's system has not been updated

Tom Alonso
did not do this deal (he did a BUY  with the same terms)

Sean Crandall
562641

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/27/2001 02:32 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/27 Checkout

PREBON

Matt Motley
I am missing the following deal:
Enron sells to Alleghany Q4'01 Palo Verde at $125.00 peak hrs

Chris Mallory
I am missing the following deal:
Enron buys from Duke Q2'01 25 mw of NP-15 at $180.00 off-peak hrs

Jeff Richter
deal 562546
Prebon shows 25 mw ....enpower has 23 mw

AMEREX WEST
All deals are fine.

BLOOMBERG      P.S. I am still confirming trades for Bloomberg.

Mike Driscoll
deal 562226
Bloomberg show cp name as Arizona Public Service Company....enpower has
Pinnacle West Corp.

Tom Alonso
I am missing the following deal:
Enron sells to El Paso 25 mw of April'01 PV peak hrs at $265.00

Sean Crandall
I am missing the following deal:
Enron buys from Pacificorp25 mw April MID-C peak hrs at $285.00


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/18/2000 02:22 PM -----

	Steve HPL Schneider
	12/18/2000 07:16 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Schedule 4.11

Item #11 (retained) has changed and needs to be updated on the schedule.
Pintail has elected not to accept our proposal and has submitted termination
under the contract.  Their future actions are unknown at this time.

The potential arbitration proceedings with Shanghai needs to be added to the
list as a retained litigation.  Contact Britt Davis for details.

Item #3 (unretained) probably needs to clarify the current situation.  In
this proceeding, it is my understanding that HPL has already condemned the
property and posted the appropriate bond as per the Court order.  The
landowners were not satisfied with the findings of the Commissioners and have
filed suit seeking a higher value.

It is unknown at this time whether there will be any litigation that comes
out of the A/S pipeline rupture incident in Mt Belvieu.


God, how ironic.  I could barely read the story over the HUGE banner
advertisement for, get this, a Chevron gas credit card.  Sigh.....

If Bush tries to take away folks rights to sue under the ESA, he's gonna get
fried.

Cameron, tell your people to stop surfing the web and focus on time to
profitability, fer cryin' out loud. :)

Best,
Jeff

	Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com>
	04/11/2001 01:46 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc: "'Prentice (Berkeley)'" <psellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, "'Scott Laughlin'"
<scottwl@hotmail.com>
		 Subject: FW: In league with the Devil

I bet Jeff has some kind of explanation for this one also(

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From:    Justin Richmond
Sent:   Wednesday, April 11, 2001 11:28 AM
To:   Cameron Sellers
Subject:   In league with the Devil

I can,t believe he is for real:
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/Science/Endangered_Species
<http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/Science/Endangered_Species>

Justin L. Richmond
Director of Business Development

1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
650.798.3368 (direct dial)
650.858.1095 (fax)
justin@perfect.com


Scott,

Richard Tomaski wants one more physical book set up under the Enovate name
while retaining the other books already set up.  This counterparty name
Enovate is replacing the Midwest Energy Hub.  But wants to be able to
differentiate deals done as solely Enovate with deals done as Enron Midwest.
Call me if you have any further questions, or if this presents a problem.
Thanks.

DG    3-9573


Notice No. 00-338
October 3, 2000

MEMORANDUM

TO: ALL NYMEX AND COMEX MEMBERS

FROM: Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

DATE: October 3, 2000

RE: Notice of CFTC Approval of New NYMEX Rule 6.40C: ("Average Price
Calculations by Futures Commission Merchants")

Please be advised that the CFTC has approved new NYMEX Rule 6.40C ("Average
Price Calculations by Futures Commission Merchants"), which is attached and
is now in effect.

New NYMEX Rule 6.40C, which is consistent with a recent CFTC "Advisory,"
permits FCMs, under certain conditions specified in the rule, to use their
own internal, proprietary systems to generate average price ("AP")
calculations when multiple prices are received on an order or series of
orders.  AP calculations are not being provided by the Exchange for NYMEX
Division contracts.

New NYMEX Rule 6.40C is applicable only to NYMEX Division contracts.  A
similar proposal for COMEX Division contracts remains pending with the CFTC.

The conditions specified in NYMEX Rule 6.40C include the following:

1. The customer has requested average price reporting;
2. Each individual trade is submitted to and cleared by the Exchange at the
executed price;
3. The FCM calculates and confirms to its customers a weighted mathematical
average price;
4. The FCM possesses the records to support the calculations and the
allocations to customer accounts and maintains all such records pursuant to
CFTC regulations and further makes such records available for inspection by
affected customers upon request; and
5. The FCM identifies each trade to which an average price is assigned as
having an average price on each confirmation statement and monthly statement
on which the trade is reported to the customer.

If you have any questions, please contact Tom LaSala, Vice President,
Compliance Department, at (212) 299-2897, or Brian Regan, Senior Associate
General Counsel, at (212) 299-2207.
Approved New NYMEX Rule 6.40C

("Average Price Calculations by Futures Commission Merchants")

(Entire rule is new.)

Rule 6.40C Average Price Calculations by Futures Commission Merchants

(A) Eligible Accounts.  An FCM, subject to compliance with the conditions
specified in this rule, may report and/or confirm to customers an average of
multiple execution prices and may use its own proprietary system to make such
average price calculations, regardless of whether the Exchange also provides
a service for average price calculations for the applicable NYMEX Division
contract, provided:

(a) that such prices were obtained as the result of the execution of an order
or series of orders to purchase or sell the same futures and/or the same
option series for the same account or group of accounts; or

(b) that such prices were obtained as the result of the execution of trades
to purchase or sell the same futures and/or the same option series for the
FCM's proprietary account(s), provided further however, that trades for such
a proprietary account are not averaged with trades for any other account.

For purposes of this rule, eligible accounts may include multiple accounts
that are part of a managed account program or other common investment
program.  Eligible accounts may include individual non-discretionary
accounts, except that prices for non-discretionary accounts may not be
averaged with prices for other non-discretionary accounts.  Eligible accounts
also may include individual discretionary accounts consistent with the
provisions of Exchange Rule 6.41.

(B) An  FCM may use its own system to calculate average prices for contracts
executed on the Exchange provided that the following conditions are met for
all such transactions:

1. The customer has requested average price reporting;

2. Each individual trade is submitted to and cleared by the Exchange at the
executed price;

3. The FCM calculates and confirms to its customers a weighted mathematical
average price, as calculated pursuant to the requirements of Section (C)
below;

4. The FCM possesses the records to support the calculations and the
allocations to customer accounts and maintains all such records pursuant to
CFTC regulations and further makes such records available for inspection by
affected customers upon request; and

5. The FCM identifies each trade to which an average price is assigned as
having an average price on each confirmation statement and monthly statement
on which the trade is reported to the customer.

(C) Calculation of Average Price.  The weighted mathematical average price
shall be computed by FCMs by:

(a) multiplying the number of contracts purchased or sold at each execution
price by that price;

(b) adding the results together; and

(c) dividing by the total number of contracts.

For a series of orders, the average price may be computed based on the
average price of each order in that series.

FCMs may confirm to customers either the actual average price or the average
price rounded to the next price increment, provided however, that in
confirming the average price rounded to the next price increment, the FCM
must round the average price up to the next price increment for a buy order
or down to the next price increment for a sell order, and must pay any
residual thus created to the customer, except that any residual amount of
less than one cent may be retained by the FCM.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(00-338)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


My RC is 0005 , #413  Jeff Hodge is my supervisor.

dp


Today is not a good day for me to go out after work.  I'm planning on picking
up my sweetie (Michael) from school, since I've been out of town.  I would
vote for the Roll-in.  No question.  I would buy just to see Keffer there.

Kay


Shari,

# of Producer Services deals in Apr:  439 existing
                  5 new
             444 Total


13451 Belhaven Dr
Houston, Tx  77069

-----Original Message-----
From: McConnell, Sarah [mailto:Sarah.McConnell@COMPAQ.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:49 AM
To: McConnell, Mark
Subject: Need Mike and Chris' address

Sarah Hlavinka McConnell
Associate General Counsel
Compaq Computer Corporation
MS 110701
20555 SH 249
Houston, TX  77070-2698
Phone (281) 514-4933
Facsimile (281) 518-7501
sarah.mcconnell@compaq.com <mailto:sarah.mcconnell@compaq.com>


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2001 04:44 PM -----

	"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>
	03/15/2001 10:20 AM

		 To: cyoder@ect.enron.com, Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com
		 cc: chris.calger@enron.com, pboylston@stoel.com
		 Subject: Call with Pirog

** PRIVATE **

Set forth is a brief summary of my call with John Pirog last night.  Overall,
I felt we made a lot of progress.  At the end of the call, Pirog said that
prior to the call he was uncertain whether a deal was possible, but at the
end he said that he thought we could probably work through a number of the
issues and he said he was going to send some sample language for our
consideration on a few of the points.  We said that we would be begin to
modify our draft as well to reflect some of the concepts we spoke about and
that we could then "compare notes."  He said that CDWR viewed the Enron
Contract as an important one and he said he would be back to us fairly
quickly.

Material Regulatory Change Provision.  Pirog said CDWR would be willing to
accept such a provision if it were limited to an event that adversely affects
CDWR's ability to perform under the contract, most particularly its ability
to pay for power.  (Such an event likely would be a CA legislature or
regulatory generated change).  Pirog said he thought that CDWR would agree to
a termination payment if this occurred, although they may not want the MRC to
be characterized as a "default" (which should not be a problem from our
standpoint).   CDWR would not be willing to protect EPMI for a change (e.g.,
in law) that materially affects EPMI's business, but does not adversely
affect CDWR's ability to make payments to EPMI.  (For example, a new CA law
that requires sellers into CA to turn over all their books and records to the
CPUC).  Further, as we anticipated, he said CDWR was not willing to be on the
hook for a termination payment for an event outside its control, such as a
FERC change or Federal Legislation that adversely affects us.  However, he
did say that CDWR might entertain a "no LD walk right" for EPMI if such a
change adversely affected it.  My sense is that ultimately Pirog/CDWR will
back track on that since such a change could occur when our contract is
heavily in the money to CDWR and this would allow us an out without paying
LDs.

Early Walk Provision.  He reiterated that CDWR would not extend the Option.
With respect to the early walk away right that has been offered, it was
discussed that this could be structured in such a way that EPMI could walk
from the deal (without receiving or paying a Termination Payment) up until a
date certain (September 1 and September 30 were mentioned by me as
possibilities, although Pirog said that other suppliers had a shorter window)
(our request is based on the gloomy news that has been eminating from the CA
Treasurer's office about the bond issue), provided that if the bonds were
issued earlier than that, the walk away right would terminate; that is, EPMI
would not be free to walk if CDWR was able to issue bonds with an investment
grade rating prior to the Drop Dead Date.

Termination Payment Due Date.   Pirog said CDWR cannot shorten it from 180
days.  He said all other suppliers have lived with that.  Pirog is
sympathetic to our concerns, but said that the "bond guys" are already
nervous about only having 180 days (if they had to issue bonds to pay the
LDs).

Suspension of Delivery.  Emphasizing our concern with the 180 days, I
requested that CDWR provide some flexibility on our right to suspend
perfromance in the event of an event of default and, perhaps some other
events, such as a bond downgrade.  Pirog said he thought CDWR could work with
us on that.

Downgrade not a Default.  CDWR was not willing to have a bond downgrade an
event of default.  However, he said CDWR would be willing to consider having
a Downgrade Event a "no LD walk right" for EPMI and perhaps an event
justifying EPMI in suspending deliveries.  In other words, a Downgrade Event
would be treated like an Event of Default, but no termination payment would
be owed and EPMI would have the flexibility to suspend performance.  Pirog
also discussed adding a covenant that CDWR would attempt to secure a Credit
Rating with respect to the claims paying ability of the Fund in the event
that no bonds were issued.  That is, if no Bonds were outstanding and the
Fund did not have an investment grade rating, we could terminate, but without
LDs.

Cross Defaults.  This clearly is one of CDWR's hot buttons, and we will not
be able to get this is my sense.  However, when asked about the idea of a
Cross Default Out w/out a termination payment, he stated that he would like
to discuss that further with CDWR.

LD Calculation Methodology.  Pirog said it was very unlikely CDWR would
accept our proposed language.  He said they are striving for consistency
among contracts and said their proposal is viewed as more "objective."  My
sense is that we will need to get comfortable with it in general.

Arbitration.  In general, Pirog did not have a problem, except for the
following: a desire to limit it to contractual claims only (i.e., no tort
actions, extra-contractual disputes, etc. would be subject to it).  Also,
holding hearings in New York City was not well received, and a request was
made that all three arbitrators be neutral.  I would think that the situs
issue will be a big one for Richard Sanders in light of the political
environment if a dispute were to arise.  My general sense, however, is that
this is not a "deal breaker" for CDWR.

Assignment.  In general, he understood the nature of our changes on this
issue and said they were reasonable although he caveated that on this issue
as well they are looking  for some consistency.  We were again asked if
assignment back to the IOUs would be acceptable, even though he knew what our
reaction would be.  Pirog offered to provide us sample language, which we
said we would look at.  We stated that conceptually this would be a difficult
sell in light of the environment.  He did not elaborate on how stringent the
assignment standards are in the other deals.

New Govt Charge Pass Throughs.  A pass through of some governmental charges
was considered to be okay, but he said our proposed language was too broad.
Pirog offered to provide some examples of acceptable language on this.  He di
agre, howeve, that if for example, CA imposed an excess profits tax, that it
was fair for us to be protected from that.

Legal Opinions.  Pirog did not think that a legal opinion from Hawkins would
be forthcoming, although he did say that he would look into whether or not
they would be providing one on the bonds.  Also, he said it was a possibility
that the California Attorney General would issue the opinion on the bonds, so
we might possibly ask for that in lieu of an opinion from Hawkins.
Realistically, it likely will be very difficult to get this before we have to
extend the option; perhaps, we can put in a covenant on CDWR to get us that
before our walk right expires.

Additional CDWR Covenants.  Pirog stated that the additional covenants we
have requested are conceptually okay with him, but need to be discussed
internally with CDWR.

Pro Rata "Spread" Amortization.  Pirog had not reviewed the idea of
amortizing the Credit Amount over the four year term, and said that he would
run it by CDWR.

CDWR Information.  Pirog said he would follow up with CDWR on how often it
plans to give suppliers financial information.  He was resisting our request
for monthly information, although I pointed out that we really only wanted
information that frequently in the beginning of the transaction as things
start to fall into place.

Let me know when you wish to follow up.

John

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212
424-8125.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
jklauber@llgm.com


Exactly what I wanted.  Thanks maaan.

John Hodge
12/14/2000 08:47 AM
To: Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Les
Webber/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Transco's Momentum Expansion and Elba

As a result of discussions for capacity to serve electric generation sites in
Georgia through Transco's Momentum Expansion, Transco has proposed a rate of
$0.32 plus 2.35% fuel for receipts in Zone 3 (Station 65) and deliveries in
Zone 4.  If you assume fuel on a gas cost of $4.00 ($.095 fuel), then the
total rate is $0.415.

Assuming the aforementioned rate, Southern Company can pay Transco $0.415 or
purchase gas from Elba and backhaul on Sonat at a rate of $0.22 which would
netback to Elba at Hub + $0.195.  If you assume a basis of $0.01 for gas on
Transco Zone 3, then the netback goes up to Hub plus $0.205.

Transco has also offered a $0.27 Momentum rate for receipts from Station
85/Destin (Zone 4) and deliveries in Georgia.  With fuel at 1.9% and $4.00
gas, the total rate is $0.35.  However, basis at Station 85 is $0.04 and that
takes the delivered cost up to Hub + $0.39.
This delivered price would yield a backhaul netback to Elba at Hub + $0.17.

Since Southern Company can site generation in Sonat Zone 2 (Alabama) or Zone
3 (Georgia), they are probably unwilling to pay this high a netback price at
Elba.  Additionally, most power developers will not commit to a baseload
quantity given that they will be serving a peaking market.  One alternative
is to sell to existing firm shippers on the Sonat system that would view Elba
as a savings on variable cost on their FT agreement.  The net is a Hub +
$0.10 at Elba assuming a basis of $.04 at Destin.

Through discussions with Phil Demoes, Southern Company has stated that a
price of Hub + $0.20 was out of the question.  Phil indicates that we could
probably strike a deal between their bid of Hub + $0.12 and Hub + $0.17.


Paul & Stan

Here is our purchase proposal we have been sending out for renewal on our purchase agreements.  We have left it somewhat open ended to account for differences in the individual gas packages.  Please review this proposal, as I will be calling you shortly to discuss any changes or questions you have to the proposal.  You can reach me at (303) 575-6474.

Sincerely,

Paul Lucci


As the individual responsible within Enron Corp. for coordinating the
analysis of regulatory transfer restriction issues in the above-referenced
project, I wanted to give each of you a brief update, but more importantly,
ask for your help in ensuring, as we move closer to the signing date, that we
are fully coordinated on these issues and are prepared to act in a consistent
and coordinated fashion across the regions as quickly as possible.

Over the last several weeks, the regional general counsel offices, V&E (Bill
Weiland), Skadden and myself have been talking to local counsel across the
regions to make sure that we fully understand all of the regulatory transfer
issues and that we also fully understand the implications of the regulatory
transfer restrictions in the context of the "ABC" deal structure.  We have
now largely completed that process and the conclusions reached during that
process have been memorialized in various documents, including the "ABC
Matrix" that many, if not all of you, have seen.  All that is remaining is
confirmation on a South Korean competition agency issue and the completion of
the analysis relative to the Wind assets in Europe regarding EU competition
agency issues. Those two items should be completed by early next week.  We
have also recently begun the process of preparing documents that will be
necessary for the approval of the transfer of Elektro in Brazil...which
brings me to the second issue, coordination and preparation.

Having reached a critical juncture with the completition of virtually all of
the regulatory analysis, the next step is to plan for the announcement of the
transaction...more specifically, ensuring that regulatory/governmental
communication assignments for both pre and post announcement are fully agreed
upon and understood by all... and that the process of drafting the necessary
requests for regulatory approval documents is agreed upon and begun as soon
as possible.  To ensure that this all happens in a timely manner and with
quality, I would like to request that one individual from each operating
region and company be assigned as the point person so that I can have a
single individual within each operating unit to go to that has the authority
to put together the comprehensive regulatory transfer plan and the
responsibility for assuring the execution of the plan, both during the
periods of time leading up to signing and announcement and during the
transition period leading up to closing.  I would respectfully ask that the
names of these individuals be communicated to me by close of business
Wednesday, August 16, 2000 to provide us sufficient time to address the work
that lies before us.  I have taken the liberty of listing my suggestions for
the responsible individuals (where I have suggestions) for the respective
operating regions/companies, but these are only suggestions and I will defer
to your choices.  Thank you for your assistance and if you have any
questions, feel free to contact me at extension 33407 in Houston or by pager
at 888-740-9949.

Enron South America   Jose Bestard
Enron Wind    Eric B. Newell
India     Jane Wilson
Apachi     Mike Dahlke
CALME     ?


I will be on vacation but will be there the next week.
PL


One more revision to the GTC.  Few changes based on my discussion with Carl
this morning.  I have attached a clean and redlined copy.  The redline is
compared against the version prior to the secondary point discussion for
Colleen's benefit.  I am fine to run with this copy from a legal perspective
unless Dick or Colleen had any comments.


Tyrus Burgess
821 Dorchester Ave.
Dorchester, MA 02125
tyrus@onebox.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Tyrus Burgess


Jason:

Here's my suggestion for item (ix) [Additional Event of Default] event on
page 2 of the Schedule:

"In the case of Party B, Enron North America Corp. .... owns less than a
majority interest in Party B unless within five (5) Local Business Days of
such occurrence, Party B posts collateral with Party A (i) in an amount equal
to Party A's Exposure under this Agreement plus $250,000, but in no event
greater than 125% of Party A's Exposure, and (ii) in a form satisfactory to
Party A in Party A's reasonable discretion.

"Exposure" shall mean for any relevant date for which Exposure is calculated,
the amount, if any, that would be payable to Party A by Party B pursuant to
Section 6(e)(ii)(2)(A) of this Agreement as if all Transactions were being
terminated as of the relevant date; provided that Market Quotation will be
determined by Party A using its estimates at mid-market of the amounts that
would be paid for Replacement Transactions (as that term is defined in the
definition of "Market quotation") in order to ensure that Party A does not
suffer an economic penalty."

I think that we agreed on everything else.

Please send new blackline.  Thanks.

Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


hey sus-
when you get a chance could you send me your address and your parents?  i
know i have yours and lisa's somewhere, but i better start a new list.
thanks!!

Laura Jahnke
Corporate Recruiter
Smith & Associates
T 713.430.3076
F 713.430.3071
www.smithweb.com


Daily Blessing

http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless138.htm

The thief and the parrot

http://www.daily-blessings.com/humor50.htm

win a digital camera, $4500.00 or MORE
http://www.daily-blessings.com/4500.htm

how to buy a house with no money down and lots more info!
http://www.daily-blessings.com/bottom.htm

check your email more often than your calendar?
http://www.daily-blessings.com/reminder.htm

get your free mousepad yet?
http://www.daily-blessings.com/mousepad.htm

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (judy.hernandez@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address judy.hernandez@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: judy.hernandez@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


This is the correspondence surrounding the conference call that is
scheduled today at 2:30 with Professor Peterson.

Thanks!

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2000
08:46 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
02/01/2000 04:14 PM
To: Jodi Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Kellogg Class Information on Real Options

Jodi,

Chris can set up a conference call with myself, Stinson Gibner and Zimin Lu
to discuss
the real option applications. My assistant Shirley Crenshaw, 3-5290, will be
glad to help him.

Vince

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  Jodi Coulter                           02/01/2000 11:36 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Kellogg Class Information on Real Options

Vince -

Per my voicemail, the following is the message I received from Chris Swenson
about the Kellogg Class he is trying to form.  Please let me know if you
would be able to help him.  Thanks.

Jodi
x56318

---------------------- Forwarded by Jodi Coulter/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2000 11:05
AM ---------------------------

"Christopher P. Swenson" <c-swenson@kellogg.nwu.edu> on 01/25/2000 06:42:58 PM
To: Jodi Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hello

Hi Jodi,

I have been remiss in keeping up with you and letting you know what is
going on
in my little world here at Kellogg.

In other matters, life at Kellogg has me very busy at the moment.  I am taking
a full load, including Fin Decisions and am helping Prof. Petersen write a new
class called Advanced Valuation, which will be offered in the spring.  A big
part of the focus of this class is going to be on real options, which is cool
stuff.  And as poor as my timing is, I would like to ask you a
question/favor.
For purposes of this class, do you think it would be possible to obtain
some of
Enron's thoughts on real options?  I was thinking, for example, that a
fuel-switching analysis would be neat to included in the case packet.  Of
course, none of the numbers or names need be real-- only the concepts.  Well,
let me know what you think of that-- who knows, Enron might actually like the
free exposure.

All the best,

Chris


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000 03:36
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Kyle Etter" <kyle_etter@hotmail.com>
11/01/2000 10:45 PM

To: Susan.M.Scott@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re:

Susan,

Well you have either had a week from hell so far or its just taking you time
to come up with some good bs.  Without being too forward I will be in town
next Friday and wanted to know if you would like to go to dinner or
something.  At least that will give us a chance to talk face to face.  If
your busy don't worry about it I thought I would just throw it out there.

I'll keep this one short and sweet since the last one was rather lengthy.
Hope this Thursday is a little better then last week.

Kyle

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Coal Net Open Position Violation
 Net Open Position - 18.4 Million Tons
 Net Open Position Limit - 15.0 Million Tons

EES VaR Violation
 VaR   - $11.83 Million
 VaR Limit  - $6.00 Million

Enron Americas Gas Trading VaR Violation
 VaR   -  $70.53 Million
 VaR Limit  - $70.00 Million

Enron Europe Gas Trading VaR Violation
 VaR   - $7.59 Million
 VaR Limit  - $7.00 Million


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

 - 10-26 1000 Report.xls


Are you inviting your woman to this?  I may need to extend an invitation to
Ingrid.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 06/19/2000 10:34
AM ---------------------------

Joan Veselack@ENRON
06/12/2000 11:43 AM
To: bkadams@ceg.com, Robert Bailey/GCO/Enron, briant.baker@enron.com,
Charles_Ballmer@enron.com @ INTERNET, jbarker@enron.com,
bartlon@epenergy.com, tbowen@enron.com, mbray@energystorehouse.com,
marty.brinkman@dhcmail.com, cburnette@columbiaenergy.com,
hchoate@ect.enron.com @ INTERNET, "Frnka D (Dawn)" <DFrnka@equiva.com>,
rdempsey@energyusa.com, paul.drexelius@cinergy.com,
matthew_b_fleming@ees.enron.com, kgarde@mjksales.com, mgarred@enron.com,
jhamilton@tmh.tmc.edu, jillk@wjet.com @ INTERNET, blarnich@aol,
mckolosseus@dow.com, scott.kraynak@mwk.com, LANDRYC@GGC.COM,
lennon@sugar-land.dowell.slb.com, smcarthur@welcom.com, mccuenk@epenergy.com,
eric.mcmurry@engageenergy.com, maluis@equiva.com, cybr@ti.com, "Ziba Mehra"
<zibam@theticketcompany.com>, clmiller@shellus.com,
mmoorehead@networkoil.com, "Morrissette, Vince" <MorrissetteV@EpEnergy.com>,
estate@infohwy.com, flyyfsher@aol.com, roupes@pge-energy.com,
Samandjulie855@cs.com, asayegh@enron.com, sascherwitz@dow.com,
carolyn_a_shelton@reliantenergy.com, jrs@shellus.com,
james.thompson@equistarchem.com, tudor@shellus.com, "Gloria Uria"
<guria@statoilenergy.com>, bvanderh@enron.com, aevigil@dow.com,
cawagner@shellus.com, kwilliams@columbiaenergygroup.com,
swilliams01@coral-energy.com, kolinge@enron.com, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christina
Sanchez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sabra L Dinari/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe A
Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
vlamadr@enron.com, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jesse
Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Clarissa
Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Vachuska/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip
Villagomez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith
Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Molly Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy
Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammi DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F
Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas,
Darren Espey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cora Pendergrass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark L
Schrab/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jacqueline P Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janet Edwards/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
maluis@equiva.com, Jennifer Shipos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita K Patton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
ofarrsc@texaco.com, Shawna Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: ICE LUGE PARTY - IT'S FINALLY HERE

Last summer my pool was being renovated... and no ice luge... but it's
back!!! Just in time to celebrate Summer 2000.

WHEN:  Saturday, June 24th, 8 pm to Midnight (yes... ends at midnight... pool
rules)

WHERE: Joni's Pool at 1100 Augusta Drive, Woods on Augusta (directions below)

WHAT:  Ice Luge (bring your favorite shots in plastic containers... glass not
allowed in the pool area)
  Kegs of Shiner and Bud Light (if don't like... tough.... bring your own)
  Snacks will be provided

BRING:  Swim Suit and Towel for Hot Tub and Pool (okay.... your rubber ducky
too)

NEEDED: Tunes... I have a radio/CD player.... but no CD's.... who wants to be
D.J.???

DIRECTIONS:

From I-10:  Exit south on Chimney Rock. Pass Memorial and Woodway. First
light after Woodway is Sugar Hill. Turn west (right) on Sugar Hill. Pass
Bering. Pass Kelsey Seybold on the left. Next Stop Sign is Augusta. My
Complex is "Woods on Augusta" on the southwest corner of Sugar Hill and
Augusta. Please park outside the complex. Walk-in gates on Augusta and Sugar
Hill. My Apartment is #33. We will be at the pool, in the middle of the
complex... just follow the noise.

From 59: Exit north on Chimney Rock. Pass Richmond, Westheimer, and San
Felipe. First light after San Felipe is Sugar Hill. Turn west (left) on Sugar
Hill. Pass Bering. Pass Kelsey Seybold on the left. Next Stop Sign is
Augusta. My Complex is "Woods on Augusta" on the southwest corner of Sugar
Hill and Augusta. Please park outside the complex. Walk-in gates on Augusta
and Sugar Hill. My Apartment is #33. We will be at the pool, in the middle of
the complex... just follow the noise.

From 610: Exit east on Woodway (outside the loop). Pass Post Oak and Sage. At
Chimney Rock turn south (left). First light on Chimney Rock is Sugar Hill.
Turn west (right) on Sugar Hill. Pass Bering. Pass Kelsey Seybold on the
left. Next Stop Sign is Augusta. My Complex is "Woods on Augusta" on the
southwest corner of Sugar Hill and Augusta. Please park outside the complex.
Walk-in gates on Augusta and Sugar Hill. My Apartment is #33. We will be at
the pool, in the middle of the complex... just follow the noise.

If I left someone out... it was unintentional!!

Please pass the invite to mutual friends. Because of limited accommodations,
please don't invite all of Houston!!!


Dave

It sounds like the urgency on the Wind Power decision wasn't a reality.
Kevin says that they are working on it.  If you need me to do anything let me
know.

Lavo


You have received this email because you are listed as an alternate data
approver. Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000013287&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000013287
Approver            : stinson.gibner@enron.com
Request Create Date : 1/10/01 5:57:18 PM
Requested For       : rakesh.bharati@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory


EOL Logon: emclaug errol5enter


Dynergi released the CGAS capcity to us for one month so we could do it non
bidable.  Scott, it looks recallable.  Its parcel number 28464.  Vol=7500,
receipt point is Leach, delivery point is City of Richmond.  The rate is
$2.40 = $.08.

Everything looks good except the recallable factor.

Also, there is a small NYSEG release for 24 dt's at max rate, offer #28446.
I can't get my machine to print out the forms.

Good Luck.


Have you requested my upgrade?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/19/99
10:09 AM ---------------------------

Felix Buitron
12/15/99 08:45 AM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: IT Purchasing Process

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Felix Buitron/HOU/ECT on 12/15/99 08:45
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  General Announcement @ ENRON                           12/06/99 06:20
PM

Sent by: General Announcement@ENRON
To: All Enron North America And Corp
cc:
Subject: IT Purchasing Process

In an effort to continuously improve the service we provide to our customers
we have created one central mail ID for all IT Purchase Requests.  This new
ID is Enron IT Purchasing.  Please send all future IT Purchasing requests to
this ID as opposed to sending your requests to one individual in the
purchasing group.  If you do not use this ID your purchase request may be
delayed.  Also, please remember that all Technology purchases should go
through the IT Purchasing department if you intend to use them for business
purposes.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Regards,
Bob Hillier
Application Systems


Hi!

             I gave his resume to Scott Neal.  He is going to look at it and
pass it on to the appropriate people.  It looks like his backround includes
more origination experience than trading.

Take care!


Per your request, historical California throughput data for TW and competitive pipelines.


Start Date: 1/24/02; HourAhead hour: 3;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Dear Internet Stock News club members,

We are proud to announce that VillageEdocs (formerly profiled as VillageFax.com, Softek, Inc. on Internet Stock News) has started trading under the symbol VEDO.

In addition the company reported that net sales were $952,181, a 212% increase over net sales for the prior year period.

Click below for a quote
http://quote.yahoo.com/q?s=vedo.ob&d=v1

Click below for news:
http://www.villageedocs.com/inv_news1.html

Thank You,

The Internet Stock News club


This article came out today in this week's issue of Business Week.  This story is one of three stories in a package that Business Week ran on Ene this week.
Steve Kean asked that I email this story to you ASAP

NOVEMBER 12, 2001
BUSINESS WEEK
FINANCE
By Mike McNamee

Commentary: Enron's Clout Won't Sway the SEC

For Securities & Exchange Commission Chairman Harvey L. Pitt, the SEC's
investigation into Enron Corp. (ENE ) could hardly have come at a worse
time. The future of Pitt's ambitious agenda of reforms in securities
regulation could depend on how well he handles this case.

Enron's political clout and close ties to President George W. Bush create
real risks for the SEC. Enron CEO Kenneth L. Lay is a longtime Bush backer,
and the company was the biggest corporate contributor to the President's
campaign. A Bush appointee, Pitt is attempting a delicate balancing act. He
has made it clear he wants to speed up the SEC's enforcement, in part by
rewarding companies that cooperate with probes. But he insists the SEC will
still come down hard on true corporate miscreants--and knows that any signs
of let-up could jeopardize the rest of his reform agenda.

Enter the Enron probe. The fine shadings of securities enforcement--where
most cases are settled by negotiated penalties, not court-imposed
fines--often make it hard for outsiders to tell whether the SEC is being
tough or lenient. But Pitt must go out of his way to make it clear that the
Enron case is handled by the book--getting the same strict scrutiny from the
SEC as any other, less connected company.

For now, top SEC aides say that's happening. The SEC Enforcement Div. in
Washington is looking into whether Enron adequately disclosed to
shareholders the risks of its complex deals with Andrew S. Fastow, the
company's former chief financial officer. Agency insiders say Pitt and his
fellow commissioners will be briefed on the case as it proceeds. But they
insist Pitt hasn't heard from the White House or Enron's other political
allies.

TOP LOBBYIST. Enron's connections are numerous. Besides Lay's links to Bush,
an Enron director, Wendy Lee Gramm, is the wife of Texas Senator Phil Gramm,
top Republican on the Senate Banking Committee. And Enron spreads its
lobbying budget--$2.13 million in 2000--across both parties. Just this year
it hired four lobbying firms with Democratic roots. Enron says it lobbies
heavily because it operates in regulated industries. It notes that electric
utilities outspend it 35 to 1.

On Oct. 31, a special committee of Enron's board hired William R. McLucas,
former SEC enforcement director, to represent it. McLucas should know that
any attempt to muscle the stock cops is likely to backfire. Pitt, who joined
the SEC out of law school in 1968, "remembers how the [Nixon-era] SEC
tainted itself by turning a blind eye to [fugitive financier] Robert Vesco,"
says an agency veteran. Pitt has too much riding on the Enron probe to let
its connections sway his judgment.

McNamee covers finance in Washington.

Copyright 2000-2001, by The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use   Privacy Policy


My pleasure!

	Mark S Palmer/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/24/2001 11:08 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NDA Lists

Thanks, Tana!

-MP

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 9:11 AM
To: Segura, Stephanie; Palmer, Mark S.
Cc: McCullough, Travis
Subject: NDA Lists

 << File: OFFLINE CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS.doc >>

 << File: ONLINE CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS.doc >>


Yes - Tammie still trying to find a room - can you let Frank and Laura's group know as they are out.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:26 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: Originators Meeting

Louise, I presume that this note was for Thurs A.M. Is it still scheduled.

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:28 PM
To:	Mrha, Jean; Duran, W. David; Curry, Mike; Redmond, Brian; Kroll, Heather; Luce, Laura; Forster, David; Tricoli, Carl; Irvin, Steve; Vickers, Frank; Tycholiz, Barry; Baughman, Edward D.; Lagrasta, Fred; Jacoby, Ben; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Robinson, Mitch; Thompson, C. John; Virgo, Robert
Cc:	Schoppe, Tammie; Jones, Melissa; Rode, Tina; Salinas, Michael; Martinez, Judy; Harvey, Claudette; Hogan, Irena D.; Holcombe, Tina ; Shoemake, Lisa; Bates, Kimberly; Presas, Jessica; Black, Tamara Jae; Collins, Angie; Watson, Denys; Snow, Dina; Young, Becky
Subject:	Originators Meeting

We recognize that we are experiencing a difficult time at Enron now and you are all interfacing with our customers every day.  We are therefore holding a  short meeting at 9:00am tomorrow morning to answer questions from you and your groups.

Tammie to advise on the room.  Please invite all of your groups.

Louise


----- Forwarded by Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron on 02/08/01 09:45 AM -----

	Marie Hejka
	02/08/01 09:46 AM

		 To: Anthony Mends/Enron Communications, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT, Allen
Elliott/HOU/ECT, John Gillespie/Corp/Enron, Pegi Newhouse/HOU/EES, Brandon
Rigney/Corp/Enron, Allan Sommer/Corp/Enron, Judith Schlesinger/HOU/ECT,
Kathryn Schultea/HR/Corp/Enron, Paul Timberlake/ET&S/Enron, Steve
Woods/EPSC/HOU/ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: IM Task Force Meeting Notes 02/07

Information Management  02/07/01
IM Task Force Meeting Notes - 02/07/01

Attendees
Steve Kean
Debbie Brackett
Allen Elliott
John Gillespie
Marie Hejka
Georgeanna Hoiseth
Anthony Mends
Pegi Newhouse
Brandon Rigney
Allan Sommer
Judith Schlesinger
Kathy Schultea
Paul Timberlake
George Wasaff
Joe Wong
Steve Woods

Meeting Details (Important &To Do,s8 Please review red highlights.)

IM Strategy Proposal.
Steve Kean joined the task force for a project review and to discuss if one
executive sponsor and one senior coordinator for IM should be appointed.  Per
Steve's recommendation, the task force should consider Steve as the executive
sponsor for the project.  No senior coordinator for the effort will be
appointed until some incremental successes are achieved.  Steve referenced
the Louise Kitchen/Enron Online experience where Louise and team, independent
of their day jobs, developed and launched Enron Online without budget or
traditional sponsorship.  We should continue operating in this vein.  Steve
will be available to place calls to the BU/FUs to rally support.  Our focus
should remain on identifying and developing sticky portal applications to
improve the flow of information which ultimately should increase the flow of
revenue.  Steve's message to IM Task Force:  do what it takes to make it
happen.

During the discussion with Steve, we reviewed HP's best practices portal.
Steve would like to view the HP demonstration of their best practices
portal.  Assignment:  Marie work with Maureen McVicker to identify a time
Allan Sommer and HP are available for demo.  Allan Sommer to arrange a demo
of this application at next week's task force meeting.

Assignment:  All task force members are encouraged to generate "killer"
application ideas.  Be prepared to submit your list of five "killer
applications" at next week's IM meeting.  Note, Allen Elliott's IT team will
need these next week to begin development work on these recommendations.
Review Pegi Newhouse's list of HP portal applications below.

Some features from the HP Portal which Price-Waterhouse Coopers demonstrated
include:
@HP
Email
Voice mail
Fax
Stocks
Weather
Corporate News (which remains on everyone's page---it can't be taken off)
Local News
External News
Nanny Cam
Life
HR Benefits (401K balance, detailed descriptions, etc. This was a link into
their outsourced benefits provider Hewitt Assoc.)
Life Events check lists
-Marriage Checklist (what you processes/forms you will need to access--to
save you time)
-Divorce Checklist (a longer list than previous!)
-Childbirth Checklist
Moving Online forms
Brokerage Firms to check fund performance and stock options
HMO Info at a Glance
Full Health Information
Job
Purchase Equipment
Travel bookings
PC tech support
Skills Inventory (similar to expert finder)
Personal Career Gap analysis (does gap analysis on what training you need to
accomplish your goals)
eLearning (based on your skills and position, it will suggest training you
need with links to course info)
Recruiting
Package tracker (track your UPS, FedEx packages)
Workspace
Pending tasks
Product Information
Contacts
My tool box (databases/ tools that you use, your applications)
Workgroup tools (chat room)
Calendar
Org Chart
Management Reports

*Another important feature: Single Sign on!   Many of these items link to
external sites but it is all seamless to the user.
Look & feel remains consistent throughout.  NOTE: HP saw measurable benefits
were realized when they were able to renegotiate their service agreement with
their benefits provider (outsourced like ours) because people had all of the
information at their fingertips and call volume decreased
significantly.

Portal.
Allen Elliott's team has begun development work for the respective BU/FUs.
Allen will be meeting with Brandon Rigney this week to discuss "look and
feel".

There is a Single Sign on Task Force meeting every Thursday morning at 10:00
in EB1841.  John Gillespie will be sending representation to this meeting
this week.  Feel free to attend these meetings.  Integral to our best
practices portal is a single sign application entry.

UDM/ESE.
Inktomi and Verity appear to be the choice contenders.  Autonomy requires
work on individual employees.  The task force does not expect Enron's culture
would support this requirement.  Debbie Brackett will be working with the
Software Selection Team to negotiate UDM/ESE pilot participants.

Paul collected high level pricing for each vendor.  Below is a table of that
information.  Paul is working with GSS's Peter Goebel to gain additional
pricing support. Note, Paul's final report has extensive licensing
information for each vendor.

Vendor	Initial Cost	Annual Support & Maintenance
Autonomy	$3,000,000	$540,000 / year support
Inktomi	$1,375,000	$206,250 / year support
Verity	$682,500
	($487,500  +  $162,500 + $32,500)	$130,000 / year support


All,

Please note that for May 2001, Crosstex Energy Ltd. will be paid the base contract price (IF/HSC - $0.10) under Contract 96048744.

As this is the Base Contract Price in the term agreement, no confirmation will be sent to the customer confirming the deal (we will only confirm when they elect Gas Daily Pricing).

Please adjust Sitara as necessary.

Thank you,
Melissa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bubert, Jerry
Sent:	Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:10 PM
To:	Taylor, Vance L.
Cc:	Graves, Melissa; Reinhardt, Donald P.; Riley, Brian; Smith, Susan; Walker, Robert; Weissman, George
Subject:	Crosstex Energy, Driscoll Ranch #1, Meter 9858, May, 2001

Per Section 2.2 of the GPA, Crosstex has elected to sell this gas (approximately 10,000/D) baseload for the month of May, 2001 at IF HSC - $0.10.  Thanks.  JAB


<<SUNFLOWER - NNG1.xls>> This is not the hourly worksheet.  Sunflower did
not send one to me today.  It is their standard nom by day.  Since they are
only using minimal volumes it will suffice for the weekend.

 - SUNFLOWER - NNG1.xls


it's an aquired taste

From:	Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/09/2001 02:25 PM
To:	John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

those things are TERRIBLE!!!!


It is a very cool group, their name is StereoLab, the singer is French she sings sometimes in french and sometimes in english.  I like that album.  I saw them in concert they are cool.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Villarreal, Alexandra
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:37 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:

by the way, i really like that tomato ketchup cd.  it is really cool.  thanks for letting me listen to it.


/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Today's Update is brought to you by the guys at www.FFChamps.com

Have Your Team Analyzed by an Expert
Send us your roster, along with a brief explanation of your scoring system,
starter requirements and league size and we'll personally evaluate it for
you.  We'll tell you your strength's and weaknesses.  Who to cut, who to
trade and who to go after.  We'll take all the guesswork out of your next
moves.  Championships are not won at the draft, they are won in season, by
paying careful attention to your roster.  We guarantee that we will give you
the insight that leaves your roster in better shape then when you start.
Click www.ffcpi.com   to get the Team Analyzer.

These guys are good folks, check 'em out. - Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Hi Folks,

Here's how I see the Rushing Game Matchups this week.

PLEASE NOTE:   See the cheatsheet online www.footballguys.com (when it's
posted, Thursday) for exactly where I rank players and to determine who to
start.   I always receive emails asking me how I can have a guy ranked
highly on the cheatsheet but listed under a matchup that favors the Defense.
Just because one matchup may be more favorable than another, that doesn't
necessarily mean I'd start the player with the best matchup.   Ahman Green
may have a horrible matchup one week but unless you're sitting on Edgerrin
James or Marshall Faulk, Green's your guy no matter who he's lining up
against.   The matchup info is meant to be just one more tool in your box
when it comes to deciding between players.

Stats are provided by Mike Hall's excellent FLM League Management Software.
http://www.fflm.com/ for more info.   Fantasy Points Allowed by position
numbers are from ESPN.com.
Let's get to it.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Rushing Game Matchups

Locks:  These games feature Defenses that should be overmatched against the
Offense.

Carolina's Richard Huntley / Nick Goings / Fred Hoover vs New York Jets
Defense

Who didn't see an injury coming for Biakabutuka?   Or Terry Glenn?   Or Fred
Taylor?   I know there are lots of arguments out there that the "injury
prone" tag is unjustified for some players but in my opinion, you shouldn't
be surprised to see guys like Biakabutuka go down.   Coach George Seifert
has said he's giving Huntley the "Golden Opportunity" as the starting RB
this week.   Let's see what he can do with it.   Can't think of a better
defense to run on than the pathetic Jets.   New York ranks # 31 in Rushing
Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks giving up a whopping 186
rushing yards a game.   They rank # 30 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.
Don't underestimate the loss of OL Kevin Donnalley though.   He was a
valuable part of the line.   One other semi troubling fact is that Brad
Hoover had 2 Red Zone rushes last week.   Still though, if there was ever a
week to start Huntley, this is it.

Dallas' Emmitt Smith vs Arizona Defense

It's hard to get too excited about Emmitt Smith these days but this is a
good matchup for him.   The Cowboys have had a week off and they'll be
facing the soft Arizona defense ranked # 26 in Rushing Yards Allowed per
Game over the last 4 weeks.   They're # 28 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.
QB Anthony Wright has another week of practice under the belt and should be
able to provide some passing threat to open the running game.   At least
that's the theory.   You've got to pick your spots with Smith and this looks
like a pretty good one if you've been considering playing him.

Indianapolis' Edgerrin James vs Kansas City Defense

Start James.   Yes, he's in a slump ranking just # 12 in Fantasy Points over
the last 3 games but you have to start him.  Especially against the Kansas
City defense that ranks # 29 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last
4 weeks.   If you doubt a guy like James, remember he had 7 Red Zone rushes
last week.   That's more than a lot of backs have for the season.   He's
getting the opportunities.

Kansas City's Priest Holmes / Tony Richardson vs Indianapolis Defense

Priest Holmes had another solid game last week against the soft Arizona
defense rushing for 85 yards on 15 carries (5.7 ypc)   This week, he'll face
an equally bad Colt defense that ranks # 23 in Rushing Yards Allowed per
Game over the last four weeks.   They rank # 29 in Fantasy Points Allowed to
RBs.   DE Chad Bratzke is doubtful and that'll help Holmes.   For now, it
looks like Tony Richardson is being eased back into the mix.   Look to see
what kind of role he'll take on there but for this week, I think it'll be
primarily Holmes again.

New York's Tiki Barber / Ron Dayne vs Washington Defense

The Giants Duo was less than impressive running the ball Monday night
against Philadelphia.  But the Redskins rush defense is a different story.
Washington ranks # 30 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four
weeks.   They rank # 31 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   I'd expect a
similar distribution in carries as we saw Monday night (Barber - 13 ,
Dayne - 16) and I'd expect both of them to have solid games against this
horrible defense.   Dayne is clearly the Red Zone rusher though.   He had 4
attempts Monday vs just 1 Rushing attempt for Barber.  (Barber did have 2
passes thrown to him in the Red Zone)

New York Jet's Curtis Martin vs Carolina Defense

Curtis Martin ran well when he ran last week.   It's just that he didn't get
to run enough.   Martin totaled 63 yards on 14 carries (4.5) but he needs
more than 14 carries.   He'll get them this week against a Carolina defense
that ranks # 22 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.
Carolina was already thin at LB but with Hannibal Navies breaking his arm
last week, it's even worse now.   This could be a big day for Martin.

San Diego's LaDainian Tomlinson vs Buffalo Defense

Tomlinson is very good.   The Bills are not.   Buffalo ranks # 27 in Rushing
Yards Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.   They rank # 27 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to RBs.   If you can afford to bench Tomlinson, you probably
don't need any more help from here.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Prime Matchups:  These games feature Defenses that should have trouble
stopping the Offense.

Baltimore's Terry Allen / Jason Brookins vs Jacksonville Defense

Keep an eye on the injury reports here as Terry Allen suffered a sprained
ankle last week and is iffy for Sunday's game.   Jason Brookins filled in
pretty nicely for Allen rushing 13 times for 46 yards (3.5 ypc).   He did
have a fumble though.   Jacksonville's struggling and they're not getting a
lot of help from their defense.   They rank # 20 in Rushing Yards Allowed
per Game over the last 4 weeks.   They're only slightly better in Fantasy
Points Allowed to RBs ranking # 16.   There were lots of rumors floating
around about the Ravens trying to trade for a RB.   They apparently don't
feel Allen / Brookins are enough to get the job done.   Keep an eye on this
through the week to see if Allen can go.   If you have to submit your
lineups by Thursday, I'd be leery of either back though.

Cincinnati's Corey Dillon vs Detroit Defense

The knock on Corey Dillon has always been his inconsistency.   He did little
to quiet the critics Sunday with a 16 carry for 30 yard (1.9 ypc) day
against the Bears.   Although you have to give the Bears defense credit -
they're tough.  This week, he faces a much softer Lions unit that ranks # 16
in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   They're # 21 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   I'm willing to discount last week's
performance as a testament to the Bears.   Dillon simply didn't matchup well
with the tough inside defenders of Chicago and I expect him to fare much
better here.

Denver's Mike Shanahan vs New England Defense

Take your pick here.  The latest Terrell Davis news from Sports Illustrated
is that he may be injured more than anyone's letting on.   And now ESPN's
John Clayton is reporting that Olandis Gary may get the start over Mike
Anderson in an effort to shake up the offense.   Sheesh.  The Broncos are
struggling offensively to get much going.   They'll face a Patriot team on a
major roll.   Although statistically, they're still giving up a ton of
yards.   The Indy / New England box score from last week was a strange one -
Indy loses 38-17 but has 484 total yards including 179 rushing.   The
Patriots rank # 25 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks
and also rank # 25 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   When Anderson ran
last week, he did pretty well gaining 50 yards on 11 carries (4.5 ypc)
although he did have a fumble.   11 carries won't get it done for you
though.   If I had to turn in a roster Thursday, I'd probably shy away from
the whole situation if I could even though I'd expect the Broncos as a team
to run well on New England.

Detroit's James Stewart / Lamont Warren vs Cincinnati Defense

Keep an eye on this one as James Stewart suffered an ankle injury and his
status is uncertain for this week's game.   Lamont Warren will go if Stewart
can't.   Neither player did a lot against Tennessee last week.   Warren had
18 yards on 6 carries (3.0 ypc)   Stewart had 17 yards on 9 carries (1.9
ypc)   The Bengal defense is enticing though as they rank just # 28 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   They rank # 22 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   It's likely a decision on who'll play may
not come till later this week so understand this is a risky call here if you
must decide now.

Pittsburgh's Jerome Bettis vs Tennessee Defense

How can you not start Jerome Bettis?   He ranks # 6 over the last 3 weeks in
Fantasy Points among RBs.   The Titans are improving their rush defense and
now rank # 10 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.
For the year though, they rank # 26 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.
Bettis is on a roll and I wouldn't want to be in his way come Monday Night
at their new stadium.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Even Matchups:  These games feature no real advantage either way

Arizona's Michael Pittman vs Dallas Defense

Michael Pittman continues to run well and that shouldn't change against
Dallas.   Don't forget about his receiving as he's rolled up 311 total yards
over the last 3 weeks.   Dallas is pretty average on defense ranking # 15 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   They rank # 14 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.  Thomas Jones did get 7 carries (and a TD)
last week but I think it'll be primarily Pittman here.

Minnesota's Doug Chapman vs Tampa Bay Defense

Against a very good Packer Defense last week, Chapman rushed for 90 yards on
22 carries (4.1 ypc).   This week, he faces Tampa Bay which has fallen all
the way to # 21 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.
They're tougher in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs where they rank # 12 for
the year.   Pittsburgh rolled up 220 rushing yards against Tampa Sunday so
they can definitely be run on.   One note of concern is that Jimmy
Kleinsasser had 3 Red Zone rushing attempts last week compared to just 1 for
Chapman.   Chapman showed a great nose for the endzone in college so let's
hope that Red Zone distribution starts to change.   Tampa has the tough
reputation but I wouldn't be afraid of this matchup at all.

New Orleans' Ricky Williams vs St. Louis Defense

Over the last 3 weeks, Ricky Williams is the # 4 RB in Fantasy Points.   He
starts this week for me regardless of the matchup.   St. Louis ranks # 11 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.   They rank # 17 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   Certainly, the high powered Ram offense can
take a RB out of the game but the numbers show that teams have had some
success running on them.   I'll take my chances with Ricky.

Oakland's Charlie Garner vs Philadelphia Defense

Tyrone Wheatley could play this week but I'm doubting it.   I think it'll be
Charlie Garner trying to carry the load.   The Eagles have the tough
reputation but they rank just # 19 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over
the last four weeks and # 18 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   Part of
that is due to their very tough pass defense.   Oakland's coming off a bye
week while Philadelphia's coming off a short week following a Monday night
game.   Don't forget the team's ties here.   Jon Gruden and Charlie Garner
are both former Eagles.   Bottom line - I like Gruden's ability to be able
to create some situations for Garner to shine.

Seattle's Shaun Alexander vs Miami Defense

The Miami defense has lost some luster ranking # 14 in Rushing Yards Allowed
per Game over the last four weeks.   They're still tough though and having a
healthy Zach Thomas will be a big plus.   Thomas is mobile and a hard
hitter.   Alexander is the top ranked RB in the league over the last 3 weeks
with 4 TDs in his 2 games.   Not sure he can keep that pace but you almost
have to start him this week.

St. Louis' Trung Canidate / Marshall Faulk vs New Orleans Defense

At this point, it looks like Faulk may sit another week and Canidate gets
the start again.   Coach Mike Martz is claiming he wants Faulk to be "100%"
before returning.   Canidate's stellar play allows him that luxury.
Although Canidate won't be surprising anyone after the huge game last week.
And he doesn't get to play the Swiss Cheese Jets again.   New Orleans is
tough defense ranked # 7 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last
four weeks but I'd still roll the dice on Canidate if you're needing a home
run.   He's got that breakaway potential to score from anywhere.   He also
had 6 Red Zone rushing attempts which should put to rest any talk that he's
not big enough to handle the goalline carries.

Tampa Bay's Warrick Dunn / Mike Alstott vs Minnesota Defense

Warrick Dunn says the injured foot / toe will bother him for a while but now
he's got a hamstring injury to worry about.   He hopes to be able to go this
weekend although he was ineffective last week against Pittsburgh rushing for
31 yards on 13 carries (2.4 ypc)   That won't cut it.   The Minnesota
defense is nothing special ranking # 17 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game
over the last four weeks.   They come in at # 13 in Fantasy Points Allowed
to RBs.   Both the Tampa Bay WRs, Keyshawn Johnson and Jacquez Green are
less than 100% for this game (and may even be unavailable - stay tuned) so
the Bucs may be forced to run the ball.   The Bucs haven't been scaring many
people through the air as it was and this will let the defense stack against
the run even more.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Downside Matchups:  These games feature a Defense that could pose trouble
for the Offense.

Chicago's Anthony Thomas / James Allen vs San Francisco Defense

Coach Dick Jauron said Tuesday he "doesn't want to be a one back team" and
that even after Thomas' incredible performance Sunday, Chicago will still
use a RB tandem.   He said they'll be "going with the hot hand".   It's my
guess you'll see Thomas have the hotter hand again this week.   Last week,
he rolled for 188 yards on 22 carries (8.5 ypc) and a TD.   He should have
had another TD as well getting tackled at the 1 after a 46 yard run.   San
Francisco is tough against the run ranking # 6 in Rushing Yards Allowed per
Game over the last 4 weeks.   Although they're just # 19 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to RBs.   I like Thomas here but be leery that Dick Jauron is saying
James Allen will still see time.   It's important to note that last week was
the first week that James Allen did not get a Red Zone opportunity.   And it
was the first week that Anthony Thomas did get one.   The writing is on the
wall and it's my opinion that Jauron is trying to smooth feathers and keep
Allen positive.

Miami's Lamar Smith vs Seattle Defense

This could be a tough game for Lamar Smith.   He's a between the tackles
runner and the Seahawks may give him trouble.  DTs Chad Eaton and John
Randle are a solid pair and MLB Levon Kirkland is tough.   Seattle ranks # 6
in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.   They also rank
# 6 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   Travis Minor could see more action
as the Dolphins like his receiving abilities.   Smith is still a solid
player but I'm not excited about this matchup.

New England's Antowain Smith vs Denver Defense

Antowain Smith rushed for 71 yards on 21 carries (3.4 ypc) against a weak
Colt defense Sunday.   Denver is much tougher ranking # 13 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.   They're # 11 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to RBs.   The Patriots are all about QB Tom Brady right now and I'd
expect him to stay the focus.   Smith will run just enough to keep the
defense semi-honest.   A decent matchup but certainly no cakewalk.

Philadelphia's Correll Buckhalter /  Duce Staley vs Oakland Defense

Tough to say for certain which back gets the bulk of the work but I think
you'll still see Buckhalter carry most of the load.   At least until Staley
shows he's back and 100%.   Staley had just 3 carries Monday night but
should start slowly working his way back into game shape.   It won't be easy
against a tough Raider Defense ranked # 9 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game
over the last four weeks.

Tennessee's Eddie George vs Pittsburgh Defense

George had been struggling.   Over the last 3 weeks, he's the 26th ranked
RB.   Not what you'd expect out of him.   The task doesn't get any easier
this week against a very tough and aggressive Pittsburgh Defense that ranks
# 8 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.   They rank
# 9 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   George is a power rushing RB who
doesn't match up very well with the Pittsburgh defense that's built to stop
the power game.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Defensive Slam Dunks:  These games feature a very tough Defense posing major
problems for the Offense.

Buffalo's Travis Henry vs San Diego Defense

Henry is running hard but he's struggling to produce numbers worthy of your
starting lineup.   The Offensive Line just isn't creating much for him to
work with.   And he's not an ultra quick guy who can make something out of
nothing.   Henry's best bulldozing through a hole that's opened and
punishing tacklers but he's had little chance to do that.   I don't see this
changing much against a tough San Diego defense ranked # 4 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   They rank # 3 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to RBs.   All Pro Linebacker Junior Seau is iffy for this game and
that will certainly help Henry if Seau can't go.   Although I still don't
like this matchup.

Jacksonville's Stacey Mack vs Baltimore Defense

Fred Taylor misses another game.   Like that's news.   Stacy Mack is no Fred
Taylor and unfortunately, they'll be facing a Baltimore defense that's as
tough as ever, despite their record.   The Ravens rank # 1 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   They also rank # 1 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to RBs.   Avoid Mack unless you're in a real pinch.  On the
subject of Taylor, I'm getting a lot of email and I honestly am not hearing
any more than you apparently are (or aren't)   Jacksonville is keeping it
close to the vest.   They're saying it's possible he'll play next week but
that's just a guess at this point.   The injury appears to be very serious
and it's not looking too good.   Not a lot you can do at this point though
if you're a Taylor owner as his trade value's already hit rock bottom.
Hang on and hope for the best.

San Francisco's Garrison Hearst / Kevan Barlow vs Chicago Defense

Chicago continues to rise up the defensive charts with a stifling run
defense.   Last week, they held Corey Dillon down.   Over the last 4 weeks,
they rank # 3 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game.   DTs Keith Traylor and Ted
Washington do a great job of clogging up the middle while MLB Brian Urlacher
is a proven run stopper.   The advantage for Hearst and Barlow over Dillon
is that they run outside more often but still, a very touch matchup.

Washington's Stephen Davis New York Giants Defense

Davis can't seem to find the endzone but he continues to run hard and pile
up some yards.   Over the last 3 weeks, he's gathered 257 total yards which
is solid.   This looks like a tough week for him though as the Giants rank #
2 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.   They rank #
4 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   Davis is the kind of guy who'll likely
go off when you least expect it but this doesn't look like a good matchup to
me.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

That'll do it for the Rushing Matchups.   Passing Matchups to follow late
tonight.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Bryant Analytics, Inc.   All Rights Reserved 1999-2001

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Dave has asked that a Staff Meeting be scheduled for Wednesday February 7,
2001, from 3:00 pm til 5:00 pm in 30C1.  Please mark your calendar and plan
to attend.

If you have any questions and/or conflicts, please feel free to call me (Kay
3-0643).

Thanks,

Kay


Shirley,

Can you, please, send my itinerary to Ludmila?

ludkam@aol.com

Vince


As some of you might already know, I resigned today.  I feel fortunate and blessed to have had this experience here at Enron.  Not only have I learned a tremendous amount, but I also have met some very talented and unique people.  I am not 100% sure what I will do at this point, but I will probably be heading up to NYC in January.  I feel sad to end this chapter, yet excited as I begin a new one in my life.

As always, it has been a pleasure working with you!  Keep in touch.  I will be interested to see what happens.

Carole C. Frank
Enron Net Works

713.345.3960 work
713.446.9307 cell
713.467.3860 home
carole_frank@excite.com