Jane:  Sorry for the delay.  I'm preparing a "cash only, two-way" section for
the ISDA.  I will try to get it to you this week.  Sara

	Jane McBride@ENRON
	11/27/2000 03:54 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT - 1. Credit matrix and 2. Threshold
amount

Hi Sara,

How are you going - did you have a good Thanksgiving?  Coincidentally
Thursday was also a holiday here - we were celebrating Respect for the Aged
Day though.

Actually, Sara, I was wondering how we are going in getting some drafting
together for the credit provisions discussed recently with John Suttle and
Jonathan Whitehead.

Thanks and sorry for the trouble.

Jane

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	11/09/2000 12:48 AM

		 To: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jonathan
Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT - 1. Credit matrix and 2. Threshold
amount

Jane:

If you have time in the morning (Nov. 9 Tokyo), I would like to discuss ENA's
view of the CSA/Schedule relationship.  In a nutshell, we provide that a
ratings downgrade is an Additional Event of Default in the Schedule (normally
a MAC in the CSA).  John's preferance, of course, would be a unilateral event
triggering an IBJ default (which I am sure would be difficult to negotiate).

I am not certain of the time difference but perhaps you could call me at the
office after 4 pm (Nov.8 in Houston) and I could then conference in John.
Alternatively, please feel free to contact me at home (after 7 pm Houston
time on Nov. 8) at 713-664-3207.

I look forward to hearing from you.  Regards.  Sara

	Jane McBride@ENRON
	11/07/2000 04:03 AM

		 To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT - 1. Credit matrix and 2. Threshold
amount

Dear John,

Jonathan and I met with IBJ today to try and push our negotiations through to
the end.  They are still unwilling to do a CSA with us but very significantly
their back / mid office is currently looking at getting systems support in
place which would permit them to do a CSA with us in due course.  They
acknowledged to us of their own volition that the market trend is towards
CSAs even in transactions where the counter party is not a bank.  They did
say though that it would be a few months before they would be set up to do
so. Pls note that they did not agree to do a CSA with us as soon as they are
set up to do so but they now know we will come knocking at some stage to ask
them to do it so I think we have gone as far as we can on this for now.

We will therefore move forward on the credit matrix in the meantime, if you
are still willing to do so.  The bank has a credit rating of A, so I guess
this means US$15 million credit limit.

On the assumption that it is possible to draft these terms into a contract
without a full CSA, I wonder who is best to do this drafting.  I should be
able to do the negotiations but I am not sure that I am able to do the
drafting .... Alan, do you have any suggestions?

Most of the other issues are sorted now but they still want to change the
"Threshold Amount" definition to US$10 million.  Is there any flexibility on
this?

Thanks.

Jane McBride

	John Suttle@ECT
	09/27/2000 12:39 AM

		 To: Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morten E
Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Steven Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

Jonathan,

One thing we might be able to propose is a "Credit Matrix" which prescribes a
Credit Line under which each counterparty can transact - with collateral
rights and collateral thresholds tied to the credit rating of each
counterparty.  We have used credit matrixes in several contracts here and
they are appealing in that there are no Material Adverse Change (MAC)
clauses.  This is appealing to the counterparty in that we cannot
automatically drop their collateral threshold to zero when a MAC occurs.  We
are comfortable because as the counterparty's credit quality deteriorates,
the amount of exposure to which we are subject decreases.  I would propose to
IBJ something like the following in lieu of a full CSA.  Jane and John - is
it possible to draft these collateral/credit terms into the contract without
using a full CSA?  (I think every matrix I have used here has been part of a
CSA).

Rating (S&P)     Credit Line
AA or above    $20MM
BBB+ to AA-    $15MM
BBB     $10MM
BBB-     $7MM
BB- to BB+    $5MM
Below BB-    $1MM

These terms are subject to negotiation.  Once again, the matrix removes MAC
clauses and the stress counterparties associate with such, but effectively
reduces the potential exposure we have (or THEY have) to a counterparty with
diminishing credit quality.

What do you all think?

John

Jonathan Whitehead @ ENRON   09/25/2000 08:18 PM

To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morten E
Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Steven Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

Sorry, Pressed send too early:

John, Have had a conversation with IBJ re the CSA, and they have asked us to
consider proposing a solution that does not involve a CSA. I propose to meet
with them again to try and explore why, but I would like to be prepared to
offer them a solution whereby we don't enter into a CSA, and we would limit
the types of trades that we could enter into with IBJ. My feeling is that we
would be unlikely to enter into any long term transactions (over 2 years) at
this stage anyway, and would prefer to get the relationship going, as I am
not sure they are going to budge on this issue yet. They appear to be quite
willing to discuss all the other points. We can always press for a
renegotiation at a later stage if we do want to enter into longer term deals.
I also want to keep the loan facility completely separate.

What are your thoughts on this, and what limitations would you want to put on
trades if we do not have a CSA?

Thanks,
Jonathan

	John Viverito
	09/22/2000 12:04 PM

		 To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron@ECT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT,
Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com, Kevin Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morten E Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron@ECT, Steven
Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

John-

During our last meeting with IBJ, we pushed hard for the implementation of
the CSA.  I believe that they have the systems capability to handle the
requisite activities relating to the CSA, as we understand that they utilize
same with certain financial institution counterparties.  We expressed our
view on these matters and also raised other issues that we had discussed in
our recent conference call.

IBJ informed us that they have never entered into a CSA with a non-financial
institution counterparty and my response was that Enron can then be the
first.  We requested that they raise this issue with their respective
superiors.  As you know, their response to our discussions relating to this
issue was "In terms of CSA, as we are not ready for running collateral
operations, we still do not prefer to use the CSA."  The legitimacy of this
statement is certainly debatable and the underlying reason may actually be
something entirely different, including the possibility that they merely do
not want to enter into a CSA with a non-financial institution.

We will continue to attempt to persuade IBJ to enter into the CSA with Enron,
however it is uncertain if this is achievable.


Wes & Wade --

You've probably seen this, but FERC issued this notice for Jurisdictional Public Utilities related to a FASB decision.

From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 4:40 PM
To: Steffes, James D.
Subject: FW: Accounting and Reporting from The Financial
AccountingStandards Board, AI01-1-000

Do you know who the appropriate accounting person for this info?

-----Original Message-----
From: Duscha Brown [ <mailto:dbrown@bracepatt.com>]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 4:41 PM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Fulton, Donna; snovose@enron.com;
sscott3@enron.com; Twiggs, Thane
Cc: Andrea Settanni
Subject: Accounting and Reporting from The Financial AccountingStandards
Board, AI01-1-000

Enclosed:

                                                    In Reply Refer To:

                                                     OED-DRAP
                                                 Docket No. AI01-1-000

                                                         August 10,
     2001

             TO ALL JURISDICTIONAL PUBLIC UTILITIES, LICENSEES,
             NATURAL GAS COMPANIES, AND OIL PIPELINE COMPANIES

     SUBJECT:       ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING FOR CERTAIN TYPES OF
                    FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

     INTRODUCTION

          The Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued three
     pronouncements affecting the manner in which certain types of
     financial instruments and hedging activities are measured and
     reported in the financial statements.

     Please see that attachment.

     Thank you,

Duscha S. Brown
Legal Assistant
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
2000 K St. NW
Washington, D.C. 20006


Christine, I made a few changes for purposes of clarification.

Christine Stokes
09/12/2000 09:45 AM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Revised Duke Letter

Here it is.


_________________________________________________________________

                        F O O L W A T C H
                    Friday, October 27, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172632
_________________________________________________________________

                        Close    Change  %Change

            NOW 50    1,808.66    +7.48   +0.42%
            DJIA     10,590.62  +210.50   +2.03%
            S&P 500   1,379.57   +15.13   +1.11%
            NASDAQ    3,278.36    +6.18   +0.19%
            (Numbers as of 5:00 p.m. ET)

 SPONSORED BY: FOLIOfn
 Instead of picking stocks one at a time, now in one simple
      transaction buy a whole portfolio of stocks for a low flat
      fee. FOLIO investing from FOLIOfn. Click for a Free Trial!
      http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=172633

FOOL ON THE HILL: THE $190 BILLION HAIRCUT
  How come optical networking stocks weren't called overvalued
  until they dropped on Wednesday?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172634

SPECIAL: ELVIS' RETIREMENT SECRET
  Find out how The King's estate planning went wrong in our
  retirement quiz.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172635

WEEK IN THE REVIEW: OCTOBER'S END
  Jerry Thomas summarizes a week that includes spooky stories
  about Lucent and Xerox.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172636

ONLY A FEW DAYS LEFT!
  Our online seminar makes retirement planning simple. Sign up
  today.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172637

RULE MAKER: SCHERING-PLOUGH, T. ROWE PRICE UPDATE
  Zeke Ashton gives two Rule Maker companies a third-quarter
  checkup.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172638

RULE BREAKER: RULE BREAKING ON LITTLE ROUND TOP, 1863
  According to one Fool, Civil War battle strategy is
  surprisingly relevant to Rule Breaker investing.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172639

TAXES: NEW JOB, OLD 401(K)?
  Roy Lewis explains the options for handling
  401(k) funds from a previous employer.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172640

RADIO SHOW: THIS WEEK'S LINEUP
  Listen to Tom and David Gardner talk about scary stocks and
  spooky costumes -- plus Amazon's Jeff Bezos.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172641

FOOLISH FOUR: IN SEARCH OF A DOW STOCK
  Honeywell's replacement in the Dow may mean a shrinking pool of
  Foolish Four contenders.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172642

HOT TOPICS: WHAT FOOLS ARE TALKING ABOUT
  Fools are talking about: Nortel's dark night, October's optical
  illusion, and more.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172643

FRIBBLE: DEBTORS ANONYMOUS
  There's more than one way to get out of debt. Here's what
  worked for this Fool.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172644

FOOL PLATE SPECIAL: VEECO SPARKLES
  Veeco spooked investors with an earnings warning in early
  October, but are its Q3 results really a disappointment?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172645

BREAKFAST WITH THE FOOL: JDS UNIPHASE'S WHITE-HOT Q1
  The optical networking component maker's fiscal Q1 earnings
  came in strong. Will they be enough to reverse this week's
  sector sell-off?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172646

_________________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172647
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172648
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172649
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172650
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172651

 SPONSORED BY: FOLIOfn
 Instead of picking stocks one at a time, now in one simple
      transaction buy a whole portfolio of stocks for a low flat
      fee. FOLIO investing from FOLIOfn. Click for a Free Trial!
      http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=172652

LAST WEEK TO ENROLL!
 Planning your retirement doesn't get
 any easier. Don't miss our Roadmap to
 Retirement online seminar.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172653

WIRELESS 201: NOKIA, QUALCOMM AND MORE
 Check out the sequel to the
 best-selling "Wireless 101" on Soapbox.com
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=172654

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery.
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com

 Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
 e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=172655

_________________________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

MsgId: msg-5249-B10276351Address.msg-18:54:24(10-27-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


Gerald for your review? Please provide me with your comments as soon as possible.

-----Original Message-----
From: steve_warren@illinoispower.com
[mailto:steve_warren@illinoispower.com]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:54 PM
To: Higgins, Ned
Subject: CA Agreement

Please review and comment.................

(See attached file: CA(9-10-01).doc)


I hope you are exercising reguarly given your chips, salsa, dip and beans.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Caron Horton" <Caron.Horton@Trinity.edu>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:57 PM
To:	Daddy (wk)
Subject:	good afternoon 11/1

Hello - how is your day going??  Just think  it's almost Friday!!!!!!  I'm so glad, I'm ready for the weekend.   Nothing exciting here today.  Just homework and a nap probably.   Tonight I'll be cooking and marinating in preparation for david and I's big  cookout tomorrow night.  I'm making fajitas, my famous 7-layer dip, and  spinach puffs.  Plus we'll have the normal ammenities like chips and salsa,  ranch dip, refried beans.  I'm excited - it should be fun.  Well, I'll  talk to you tonight sometime.  I love you and miss you  bunches!!!!!
Love,
Caron


Sounds good to me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 1:00 PM
To:	Spraggins, Gary; DL-ETS Gas Controllers
Subject:	RE: TW/NNG Imbalance

As of the 6th TW and NNG are balanced, I agree with Gary we need to stay balanced.

ds

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Spraggins, Gary
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 12:33 PM
To:	DL-ETS Gas Controllers
Subject:	TW/NNG Imbalance

Looks like we made up gas NNG owed TW the last few days, so lets stayed balanced on a daily basis.

Gary


Listed below are several positions which may become available over the next
several months in the Portland office.  We will be holding information
sessions on Friday, 3/23 in Mt Hood.  Listed below are details regarding the
time of the information session, position, department and hiring manager.

Time Position   Department   Hiring Manager
10:00 Senior Specialist  Fundamentals Analysis  Tim Heizenrader
10:30 Specialist/Analyst  Real Time   Bill Williams III
11:00 Specialist/Senior Specialist Volume Management  Chris Stokley
12:00   Research Analyst  Renewable Power Desk Elliot Mainzer
2:30  Power Prescheduler  Scheduling   Cara Semperger

Please feel free to attend any of these sessions to learn more about the
available opportunities.

Attached are more detailed descriptions of the above mentioned positions.  We
will be considering internal candidates as well as external candidates for
the above positions.  If you are interested, please let Amy FitzPatrick know
no later than close of business Wednesday, March 28, 2001.


You are correct. By copy of this message,  I will ask Tana to finalize.  Sara

	William S Bradford
	10/25/2000 07:55 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: DeutscheBank ("DB")

This refers to settlement or payment netting only, not close out
netting....correct?
If so, we can probably live with it.

Thanks,
Bill

From: Sara Shackleton on 10/24/2000 12:15 PM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: DeutscheBank ("DB")

I spoke with Steve Kessler this morning.  He told me that he agreed with
Carol to net commodity transactions (which was actually more than he wanted
to agree to!).  However, DB does not have the systems to net within other
product groups.  Sara


Credit Requested

Shipper : 		Tenaska Marketing Ventures
Contract # :		27847
Service Type :	FT
MDQ:			10,000 Dth/d
Rate:			$0.5
Term:			February 27 only

Dennis P. Lee
ETS
Gas Logistics
(713) 853-1715
dennis.lee@enron.com


To ensure everyone is on the same page.... Steve Stonestreet at TCO and I had
a conversation on how TCO works its storage ratchets. Steve, if I have
misstated something, please let us know.

There is a FSS schedule that tells the ratchets, minimum injections, maximum
withdrawals, etc. This FSS schedule has been updated in the attached
spreadsheet with Enron's SCQ and Enron's MDSQ, which enables Enron to know
its different volume requirements.

Based on the attached schedule, each month there are different Maximum
Monthly Injection Quantities (MMIQ)  based on Enron's SCQ. There is no
Minimum Injection Quantity required by TCO.

TCO Injection Session and % of SCQ;

April = 15%
May = 20%
June = 20%
July = 20%
Aug = 20%
Sept = 13%
Oct = 7 %

If you add these months up, the total Injection is 115%. Essentially,
shippers have an extra 15% that does not have to be used during the injection
period. Please note, Shippers can inject all year around on TCO (November is
5% and December through March is 10%... typically not done).

For example, Shippers do not have to inject the ratchet amount in April
(15%). If the Shipper falls behind on the STOI, and the Shipper needs to
catch up on STOI in the future months, and the Shipper wants to go over the
ratchet level for that month, then TCO will need to give its prior approval
(I sound like a lawyer). Typically, TCO is more willing to approve
overinjections in the early months of the injection session versus
overinjecting in September and October, when TCO is full.

Some other basic rules;

Shippers do not have to fill storage 100% by October.

Shippers cannot have more than  60% in storage by June 1st, unless
overinjection is approved by TCO.

Shippers can have daily net withdrawals in the summer, and it works the same
way it did in the Winter. Depending on the % SCQ, this will determine the
MDWQ. As of today, 8.3% is in the ground so Enron can net withdraw 54,324.
Once Enron is between 10% to 20%, then the MDWQ is 70,521... but remember
Enron's SST is only 54,324 until October 1st... so other transport will need
to be used to avoid overrun charges.

Why do we care about all of this....

Enron wants to slow down on the injection into storage. Because choice still
uses storage withdrawal in April and storage withdrawal is used for
Hopewell... there may be days that we are net withdrawing. As long as we stay
below 54,324... there will not be penalties. If we go over this amount, we
will need to get gas controls approval... the same drill we use for
overinjections above 36,304.

TCO Schedulers... we have been doing a great job monitoring this so far.
April is a very hard month to monitor storage. Remember, if we have problems
running Storage reports from our PC's or Laptops, TCO has the ability to run
the reports and TCO will run it on the weekends if necessary. From these
reports, we can determine if we need to get the overwithdrawal or
overinjection approval from TCO's Gas Control. TCO's gas control will need a
volume amount to place in their book... which is the bible for TCO enforcing
penalties. The penalties are pretty steep... max is $10 dkt.

Please save this note for future reference.


Heather will try to get you the stuff you want.  FYI, if you tell us
in advance of the meeting we can be sure to get the draft orders for you in
the Escutia room.  We do not generally get all the orders unless an attorney
or client has indicated an interest in the item.  So when we get close to a
commission meeting, give us (or Heather) a buzz and ask for what you are
tracking.  Mike


I talked with Lavo and we agreed Herndon and Black should go as well.   I think Zufferli would make 14, but we should be able to squeeze.

I am calling aviation today and I plan on arranging the following:

	1) Plane goes to Portland and picks up your guys at 9:00 am on Friday 6/21 (or 6/28 if more notice is required)
	2) Plane picks up Houston guys at approx. 3:30-4:00 pm (Houston time)
	3) We arrive in Cabo around 7:00 pm.
	4) Plane returns to Houston 6:00 pm Sunday
	5) Plane continues to Portland and arrives around 8:00 pm (Portland time)

Let me know if this works for you guys.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Belden, Tim
Sent:	Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:06 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	zufferli

should he be on the trip?  we could make him fly to portland.  to ease the travel he could spend a day or two working out of our office.


Dear Gerald:

I hope that you are well.

Glocap Legal Search is one of the fastest growing in-house legal recruiting firms in the nation.    We have worked very hard to create a truly unique and powerful legal recruiting company and we were gratified recently when  Forbes.com selected us the best recruiting website in the country!  We recruit for Fortune 500 companies, major financial institutions, consulting companies, investment banks and many other public and private companies of all sizes.

I am writing to  ask for your help. Do you know anyone who might be interested in hearing more about us?  I have briefly summarized a very small sample of the many truly outstanding, pre-screened attorneys available through our unique service. We have many more, in all practice areas and experience levels. Call me if you would like to discuss how we can be of service to your company.

 Attorneys available now include:

1. Northwestern  University School of Law (cum laude) graduate has over 4 years experience working on computer software, intellectual property and internet related issues, with particular emphasis on e-commerce and complex licensing. This very highly regarded attorney seeks a corporation or financial institution that needs in house counsel for domestic and/or international tech law matters. Midwest preferred.

2. This 1995 graduate of a top 10 law school also has an MBA (magna cum laude) from a top business school. Superb experience as a corporate attorney at a top firm (with an emphasis in entertainment law). Currently GC of an entertainment company with great corporate, securities, intellectual property and corporate governance matters. Very savvy and articulate. Willing to work on either coast, Texas or Florida.

3. A truly uniquely credentialed attorney who graduated Stanford Law School and has a graduate degree from Columbia, this candidate is also a shared recipient of the Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting and writing. Currently a litigator at a top law firm, this attorney has the intelligence,   writing ability, and work ethic to enhance any company's litigation department. Fluent in Spanish.

4.  Georgetown Law Center (cum laude) and Stanford undergraduate has over four years experience advising both private and public companies on general business/corporate matters as well as venture and debt financings, licensing, mergers and acquisitons, and public offerings. Terrific experience in securities and corporate counseling. Available either in California or East Coast.

5. A talented attorney with over eight years experience doing project finance and lending, mergers and acquisitions, and capital markets transactions at two very prominent law firms. This Russian speaking attorney has represented investors, lenders, and multilateral agencies in power, energy and natural resources industry sectors, as well as financial services, IT and telecom clients in a wide variety of m & a matters.

6. This 1996 graduate of a highly regarded law school has over five years of solid general corporate experience. Great drafting skills and superb presence, this candidate will be a very welcome addition to any in house legal staff that seeks an intelligent, hard working and very well trained corporate generalist.

7.  Attorney who graduated first in his law class is  practicing corporate restructuring and reorganization at one of New York's premier law firms. Four years experience in all aspects of distressed debt transactions, including asset sales, plans of reorganization, asset-based financings, cross-border insolvency issues and strategic distressed acquisitions. Seeking in-house or investment banking position.

8. Yale Law School, Princeton University (magna cum laude).  Senior VP of one of top financial institutions in the world, this attorney has played a leading legal, business, integration and managerial role in acquisitons, joint ventures, equity investments and divestitures. Also has broad epxerience in securities law at a top law firm. Very well spoke and personable, this candidate is interested in  a  senior business/GC type position. NY metro area.

9.   Yale University (magna cum laude), Harvard Law School (cum laude) candidate with three years transactional experience at premier law firm before leaving to become general counsel at a new media company.  Has broad corporate, real estate and and technology experience.  Exceedlingly smart, conscientious, and energetic. This candidate will be an enormous asset to any company that hires him.  Wants NY area only.

10. UChicago Law School, over five years extraordinary experience at both a top law firm and a premier incubator. Practice areas include corporate, securities, intellectual property, mergers & acquisitions, venture capital financings and technology. Dynamic, very highly regarded attorney also speaks mandarin chinese. Wants in-house or legal/business position in Southern California only.

This is just a very small sample of the attorney/candidates that we work with. We can of course tailor our search to meet any specifications that you wish. Feel free to call us to discuss our service, or to refer us to a colleague that might be interested in hearing more about us, or to obtain references from our clients.  I hope I will be speaking with you soon.

Thank you for taking the time to  consider our service.

--
Steven J. Greenberg, Esq.
Managing Partner
Glocap Legal Search LLC
Carnegie Hall Tower
152 West 57th Street, 27th Floor
New York, New York 10019-3310
212-333-6431 phone
212-333-6401 fax
greenberg@glocap.net

www.glocaplaw.com


We have confirmed that there is no current agenda item pending for the CPUC
to act on banning direct access.  Having said that, there are reports from
highly placed staff that an item to implement the AB-1X ban is being held in
Bilas' office, as he would like to see the legislative process run its
course, but there is a possibility that Lynch will reassign the matter to
another commissioner who opposes direct acess (Wood)in an effort to kill DA
before any other legislation is passed.  Please note:  The foregoing is
internal speculation/gossip from within the commission, and should not be
considered as confirmed.  Notwithstanding the controversy over implementing
AB 1X, Commissioner Brown has written a letter to Bowen endorsing direct
access and her bill, and publicly supported direct access in the Commission
meeting today.  That means 3 commissioners have voiced support for DA, and
only 2 opposed.  This again raises doubts over the accuracy of Bowen's
statement--which may have been designed to scare opponents into supporting
her bill.  We are attempting to get a copy of the letter sent by Brown and
will forward it to the lobbyists if we obtaining.  Stay tuned.  Mike Day

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Govenar [mailto:sgovenar@govadv.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 12:29 PM
To: Hedy Govenar; Mike Day; Bev Hansen; Jeff Dasovich; Susan J Mara;
Paul Kaufman; Michael McDonald; Sandra McCubbin; Rick Shapiro; Jim
Steffes; Alan Comnes; Steven Kean; Karen Denne;
Harry.Kingerski@enron.com; Leslie Lawner; Robert Frank; Ken Smith; Janel
Guerrero; Miyung Buster; Jennifer Thome; Eric Letke; Mary Schoen; David
Leboe; Ban Sharma
Subject: SBX 27 - PASSAGE

SBX2 27 (Bowen) passed out of the Senate Appropriations Committee on a
7-5 party-line vote.  In her closing, Senator Bowen said that if the
supporters of direct access do not want to help her with her bill she
would just as soon let if fail.  She also stated that the CPUC was going
to terminate direct access next week.  There was one additional
amendment taken which specifies that DWR must inform customers within 30
days of an inquiry what the projected exit fee will be.


ok.  sjk

Dale Neuner@ECT
10/26/2000 09:37 AM
To: Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Naveed
Ahmed/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: TFX Agreement

Please ensure that I have done this as expected and offer your approval, then
I'll send for loading.

MARTHA BENNER @
ENRON
10/26/2000 09:18 AM

To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari
Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: TFX Agreement

Per Steve Kirk and Drew Fossum please add the following in the "Other"
section of the TFX Agreement:

Shipper agrees that if it utilizes Northern's capacity release program to
release, on either a temporary or permanent basis, any capacity subject to
the discount contained herein at a rate greater than the discounted rate,
Shipper shall receive a demand charge credit only for the amount of the
discounted rate agreed to herein.

(Please forward this message to Naved Ahmed.  Thank you.)

Martha for Dari Dornan


Is you mail being delivered to the incorrect address?  Are your courier
packages going to the wrong building?
If so, please let me know and I (as the Master Floor Plan Coordinator)  will
have the database updated.

Have a great day :)

Taffy Milligan
Sr. Admin Assistant
EWS-Legal
Tele: 713-345-7373
Fax:  713-646-6058


Dave Asche
1535 S 56 St
Lincoln, NE 68506
fritzdave@aol.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Dave Asche


eSource presents Lexis-Nexis training

ADVANCED

This session will cover advanced searching tips.  It will also cover using
Smart Indexing to narrow your search results.  Find out how to customize your
desktop for easier searching.

Attend our Lexis-Nexis Advanced Clinic:

May. 18     8:30 - 10:00 AM    EB572

PUBLIC RECORDS

Lexis-Nexis is the premier provider of public record information.  We will
learn about materials available to you including Secretary of State Filings
and DBA's, UCC filings, Bankruptcies, and Property Records.  If you are doing
due diligence on companies, especially smaller ones, this is a session you
will want
to attend.

Attend our Lexis-Nexis Public Records Clinic:

May. 18    10:30 AM -12:00 NOON      EB572

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928
Cost $25.00 Per Person
No Shows will be charged $50.00
* Please bring your Lexis-Nexis login ID and password. If you don't have one,
a guest ID will be provided.

Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations.

http://esource.enron.com


He's doing great today.  He's here with me.  He just attended a meeting with
Ozzier, Heather, Herman and Sheila.

"Ric & Suzanne Doherty" <ricdoherty@worldnet.att.net> on 08/25/2000 09:09:11
AM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: How's Michael

Kay, I'm at home.  How's Michael?  Suz
-----------------------------
Ric Doherty
ricdoherty@att.net


Traders et al:

Here's some background on why Reliant's dropping its CA peaking offer--they're holding out for a relaxing of the air quality regs.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Schoen/NA/Enron on 05/25/2001 10:29 AM ---------------------------

"Joel Bluestein" <jbluestein@eea-inc.com> on 05/25/2001 07:31:34 AM
To:	mschoen@enron.com
cc:

Subject:	CA Power/Environmnet

Pressure builds on Davis to relax air standards

Updated: May 24, 2001 - 2:22 p.m.

A major electricity supplier said Thursday it will sharply cut prices
for power from three Southern California plants in anticipation that
air quality monitors will let the plants release more pollution this
summer.

Meanwhile, aides said Gov. Gray Davis will consider paying
businesses to run heavily polluting diesel generators to boost the
state's power supply and help avert rolling blackouts.

Reliant Energy said it could chop its power bids from the high of
$1,900 per megawatt hour Davis criticized this month to as little as
$150 per megawatt hour -- but only if air regulators quickly allow it
to exceed pollution standards at the three plants.

The Houston-based generator will cut its prices immediately, but
will soon be forced to shut down three of its five Southern California
plants for the rest of the year if pollution standards aren't lifted, said
Joe Bob Perkins, president and CEO of Reliant Energy Wholesale
Group.

Davis singled out Reliant's $1,900-per-megawatt-hour charge earlier
this month as an example of the egregious prices he said
generators should voluntarily cut.

Reliant said it deliberately bid the high price to discourage the
state's power grid operator from calling its high-polluting plants into
use. Using the plants now eats up valuable pollution credits that
will likely be needed to keep the plants running during even higher
demand periods this summer, the company said.

"In essence, we are doing exactly what Gov. Gray Davis has
suggested. But if these restrictions are not lowered, we will run out
of power from these units very quickly," Perkins said in a
statement.

Perkins proposed that emissions hours not be counted against
Reliant's yearly allotment whenever the plants are called into
operation to help prevent blackouts.

Reliant's Mandalay, Etiwanda and Ellwood plants each face annual
air pollution limits imposed by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District and the Santa Barbara County and Ventura
County air pollution control districts. Reliant has asked for
extensions from each of the districts.

"There's no question we are in an emergency situation. We will
consider every option available" to avert blackouts, said Davis
spokesman Roger Salazar. But he said the administration had not
seen Reliant's proposal.

Davis also will consider paying businesses to fire up their backup
generators when necessary to avoid outages, Salazar said.
Running the generators would let the businesses disconnect from
the state's power grid, freeing up electricity for other uses.

The proposals have consumer and environmental groups outraged.

"It's a short-term fix that will have potential long-term health
consequences," said Paul Knepprath of the American Lung
Association of California.

The state should instead cut demand by encouraging more
conservation, the lung association and 18 other consumer and
environmental groups said in a letter to Davis on Wednesday.

Davis already is promoting conservation, but blackouts have health
and public safety consequences too, Salazar said. The use of
backup generators is being proposed by the administration's top
energy advisers, but Davis has not yet seen the proposal, Salazar
said.

The governor is willing to "explore every conceivable option for
generation this summer," Salazar said.

The twin developments come the same week the administration cut
by 20 percent its estimate of new power generation that will be
available this summer. Davis now projects 4,000 additional
megawatts, 1,000 megawatts short of his original estimate. A
megawatt is enough power for about 750 homes.
Joel Bluestein
Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc.
Phone 703-528-1900
Fax 703-528-5106

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Torrey/Dawn -

Do you guys really think this is a reasonable reqeust.  Looks like there are
in excess of 1500 deals.  If you guys need this field covered,  we need to
come up with a better process than manually changing deals in TAGG.  Let me
know how you would like to handle this or if we need to discuss further.  We
will be happy to assist you any way we can,  short of manually going into
1500 deals.

Thanks

Dawn C Kenne
03/13/2001 05:13 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Broker Clean Up

Jeff,

I am attaching a list of EOL transactions that we need your help "cleaning
up".  With the new Broker-Client application that EOL is bringing on this
weekend, we need to remove EOL from the broker field.  What we have run into
is:  there are many deals in Tagg that have EOL in the broker field but no
EOL number.  We are requesting that risk go through and add the EOL deal
number to the tagg legs where there is none listed.  The reason for this is
that if we remove EOL from the broker field and there is no EOL deal number
reference, then there is no way to no if that deal is an EOL deal.  For audit
purposes, no one could tie back to the deals.

Please give this list to the appropriate risk groups (by index).  Let me know
if you have any further questions.  ALSO, this list is in addition to the
list that I provided Errol yesterday.

Thank you,
Dawn


T U E S D A Y   E X T R E M E   M A R K E T S
A complimentary service from INO.com ( http://www.ino.com/ )

Tuesday: The CRB Index is down 0.02 points to 214.60. The
US Dollar Index climbed 0.69 points to 116.08.

The Dow Industrials fell 51.66 points, at 10883.51, while
the S&P 500 trended lower by 2.33 points, last seen at 1261.18. The
Nasdaq Composite climbed 25.20 points to 2198.77.

FREE 20 PAGE GUIDE, THE "Scientific Trader" - learn to predict market!!!
   http://www.ino.com/specials/tradersnet/reversal.html
_____________________________________________________________________

PUT $300 MILLION ON YOUR SIDE!
_____________________________________________________________________

Low-Priced Course Best Way Ever To Learn The Turtle Secrets
http://store.ino.com/private/1E78A/TWTS-TurtleSecrets

Dear Trader:

Now you can learn the most powerful, valuable and profitable
trading method EVER!

. . . Now Revealed In NEW Trading Course
For Just A Small, No-Risk Investment

World Famous "Turtle" Commodity Trading Method
. . . Now Available To You

On Video And In Clear Trading Lessons
In The Privacy Of Your Home
. . . At A VERY Affordable Low, Low Price!!

Fifteen years ago, one futures trader stunned the entire trading
world as he methodically turned $400 into over $200,000,000
trading futures. In 1983, he personally taught his trading
strategies and systems to 14 people he nicknamed "The Turtles."

In the next five years, the Turtles earned some $35,000,000 as
their percent of profits from the $175,000,000 profit they made
for their teacher (who bankrolled their trading)!

Yes, those zeroes are correct.

As a group, the "Turtles" have been trading now for over 14 years
and currently manage $2,000,000,000 (2 BILLION dollars) given to
them from people and institutions all over the world. Estimated
profits for the 16 months ending this past April are over
$300,000,000 (that's 300 million dollars actual, documented
profits!)

Even now - 14 years later - five of the world's top 10 futures
money managers are Turtle traders!

Now You Can Learn The "Turtle" Trading System And Strategy
In An Exciting Personal Trading Course - In Your Living Room

READ OUR VALUABLE 16 PAGE
ONLINE BROCHURE NOW BY VISITING:

http://store.ino.com/private/1E78A/TWTS-TurtleSecrets

Turtle Trading
System Revealed!

Order Toll Free 800-538-7424 - 410-867-7424

All claims on third-party products are made by the publisher
and not by INO.com. All Products Guaranteed.

_____________________________________________________________________

E X T R E M E   M A R K E T   C O M M E N T A R Y
_____________________________________________________________________

The stock market closed mixed today. June Nasdaq prices are still
within striking distance of the April high of 1995. Sideways trading
the past week has negated a fledgling four-week-old uptrend on the
daily bar chart. Bulls still have some heavy lifting to do and their
next upside objective is resistance at the key 2,000 area. First
support is seen at the 1,732 area. June S&P 500 futures closed firmer
today. Prices have leveled off the past week, after rallying solidly
off the early-April low. Technically, bulls still need to push prices
above the 1285 resistance area. My bias is still that any recovery in
the stock market and the stock indexes won't be dramatic, but a
slower grind higher, with fits and starts. First resistance is seen
at 1285.00. First support is seen at 1206.00.

LIVESTOCK: June live cattle closed 2 cents higher at 71.12. Prices
closed at the session low and managed to fill an upside gap on the
daily bar chart that was created in early trading. The market saw
another upside corrective bounce earlier today, after punching to a
fresh 6.5-month low last Friday. The bears are in control of the
market. Prices are still trading below an accelerating two-month-old
downtrend line on the daily bar chart. The market is still a bit
short-term oversold, and I would not be surprised to see more of an
upside correction this week. Next support, basis June, is seen at
$71.00. First resistance now comes in at the $72.00 level.

August feeder cattle closed up 3 cents today at $88.25. Prices closed
at the session low today. Range-bound trade continues. As this market
neared the bottom end of the recent trading range, which is around
$87.50, the market again took an upside bias. Look for more choppy
trading between $89 and $87.50. If prices can break out of that
aforementioned range, the direction of the breakout will likely be
the direction of the next significant trend. Next resistance is seen
at $88.70-- today's high. First support is seen at $88.00.

June lean hogs closed $0.15 higher today, at $67.50. Prices are still
showing consolidation at lower levels, after the sell off last week.
Hogs are still a bit overdone on the downside, on a short-term basis,
so some more corrective upside consolidation would not surprise me.
Still, the bears have the strong momentum on their side at present.
Next support lies at $66.25. First resistance is located at the 68.15
level--today's high.

GRAINS: July corn futures closed off 3 cents at $2.05 today. Crop
progress reports out Monday evening showing very good planting
progress in the U.S. weighed on the corn market today. There is just
not much bullish fundamental news in the corn market right now. The
weak wheat market is also weighing on corn. On Monday, respected Iowa
State University Climatologist Elwynn Taylor predicted record yields
for the Corn Belt this year. It would not surprise me to see the
commodity funds make another significant downside assault on the corn
and bean markets in the near term. Next support is now seen at $2.00.
Next resistance is seen at the $2.07 1/2 level--today's high.

July soybeans closed 2 3/4 cents higher at $4.40 1/2 today. Prices
are consolidating the recent gains, but bulls still by no means have
any significant momentum. Fundamentally, there is not much in the way
of good news for bulls right now. I would not be surprised to see the
commodity funds make another downside push in beans in the near term.
This market is still in technical trouble and it's going to take a
significant weather scare this spring or summer to force prices
solidly higher. First resistance is seen at the $4.45 area and then
$4.50. First support is seen at $4.35 and then at $4.30.

July soybean meal closed off $1.10 at $155.70 today. Prices this week
are showing a corrective pullback after they pushed to a fresh
eight-week high last Friday. Recent price action is still encouraging
to the bulls and is a sign the lows are in place in the meal market.
Next resistance comes in at the $158.50 area. First support is seen
at $154.00.

July bean oil closed 22 points higher at 15.09 cents today. Prices
saw a corrective bounce today after dropping to a new contract low of
14.76 cents on Monday. This market is technically much weaker than
beans or meal, and is still a bit overdone on the downside, on a
short-term basis. I would be surprised if there is much downside left
in oil. Next resistance comes in at 15.25 cents. Next support is seen
at the contract low of 14.76 cents.

July Chicago wheat closed 2 1/2 cents lower at $2.66 3/4 today.
Prices poked to a new contract low of $2.65. More rain in the Plains
has cast a bearish pall over the market. With the wheat crop behind
schedule anyway, the recent rains could allow the crop to make some
good improvement. Bears are in full command. Just last week, prices
pushed to a fresh six-week high. Serious technical damage has
occurred the past few sessions. First support lies at the contract
low of $2.65. Next resistance is seen at $2.70. This market is
short-term oversold and I suspect we'll see a corrective bounce soon.

SOFTS: July N.Y. sugar closed 18 points higher at 9.10 cents today.
We could see a bull flag starting to form in sugar, on the daily bar
chart. This many times occurs as prices consolidate steep gains. A
three-month high was scored in July sugar late last week. The bulls
have good momentum and a steep and accelerating five-week-old uptrend
line is still in place on the daily bar chart. Next resistance now
comes in at 9.25 cents. First support is now seen at 8.80 cents.

July N.Y. coffee closed 15 points higher at 68.90 cents today. Prices
pushed to another fresh two-month high today as the bulls continue to
gain momentum. This recent move is the most significant showing by
the bulls since mid-January. The fact that prices have not sold off
sharply the past three sessions is encouraging for the bulls,
too--given recent price history. Still, the bears could be setting a
trap, like they did in early January. If bulls can push prices above
70 cents and then see follow-through strength, bears will begin to
think this uptrend is sustainable. First resistance comes in at 70
cents. First support is seen 65.00 cents.

July N.Y. cocoa closed $55 higher today, at $1,044. Today's strong
gap-higher trade on the daily bar chart put the bulls back on a level
playing field with the bears in a hurry. Prices pushed above and
negated a 2.5-month-old downtrend line on the daily bar chart. Next
resistance comes in at $1,050 and then $1,060. First support is now
seen at today's low of $1,001.

July cotton closed 99 points lower at 45.44 cents today. Cotton is in
a strong bear market, and a new contract low was scored just today,
at 45.40 cents. Right now, any rebounds are likely to be just selling
opportunities for the bears. But, my bias is still that we are not
that far from a bottoming process. Next support lies at 45.00 cents.
First resistance is seen around 48.00 cents. Would-be bottom-pickers
should beware. Bulls need to watch for some "basing" action, which
may be beginning.

July orange juice futures closed 45 points lower today, at 76.95
cents. Prices late last week probed into an important gap area on the
daily bar chart, which begins at 77.85 cents, but did not fill that
gap on the upside. Bears rule and the market is still technically
weak. However, if the aforementioned gap can be filled on the upside,
that's an important first step for the bulls in turning the market
around. That gap will be filled if prices move above 78.55 cents,
which is first resistance. Next support comes in at 76.00 cents.

July lumber futures closed $2.60 lower at $308.40 today. Prices just
Monday hit yet a new for-the-move high, at $313.20, as the bull
market roars on. Today's price action is just some healthy
consolidation in a bull market. Expect more volatility, however, as
is typical for this market. The next upside objective for the bulls
is the $315.00 area. First support is seen at the $300.00 area. This
market is still short-term overbought, technically, and I would not
be surprised to see a decent downside correction soon.

METALS: June COMEX gold closed down $1.00 today, at $265.50. Prices
late last week pushed to a new seven-week high. Despite recent choppy
trading, this market is still trending up from its early-April low.
But bulls need to see some solid upside movement soon to keep what
momentum they have recently gained. But the fact that prices have not
sold way off after the rally is encouraging to the bulls. Next
resistance is located at $268. First support is seen at $264.00.

July silver closed up $0.008 today, at $4.335 an ounce. Prices are
not that far above the contract low. Still, prices are chopping at
lower levels. This suggests a "basing" action that many markets need
to change the trend from down, to sideways, to eventually up. Next
support is seen at $4.30. First resistance is seen at $4.41. Bears
still have the advantage.

July N.Y. copper closed 1.80 cents lower today, at 76.85 cents. Stock
market weakness helped drive this market lower today. Prices are
still attempting to build a base and recover from the early-April
low. My bias is still that the downside is limited for copper. The
stock market and the U.S. economy will have to be healthy before the
bulls can really get something going in copper, however. Next
resistance is seen at 78.00 cents. Next support is seen at 76.00
cents.

ENERGIES: July crude closed $0.19 lower at $28.35 today. Bulls and
bears are at a stand-off and will duke it out over the near term.
Expect more choppy trading. Next support is seen at 28.00. Next
resistance lies at $29.50.

July heating oil closed 30 points higher today, at .7551. Bulls still
have the slight edge, but look for more choppy trading in the near
future. Next support is seen at 73.00 cents. Next resistance is seen
at 77.50 cents.

July unleaded gasoline closed 128 points lower at .9898 today. Prices
scored a new contract high just Monday, and saw follow-through
selling today. That confirms a key reversal in this market. But given
the recent volatility in unleaded, I am not placing a lot of emphasis
on this key reversal. Bulls are still in command as peak driving
season nears. Top-pickers beware! Next resistance is seen at $1.03.
First support is seen at $.9600.

July natural gas closed 3.6 cents higher at $4.35 today. Today was
just an upside correction in a steep downtrend. Prices hit a fresh
five-and-one-half-month low Monday. Next support is seen at $4.25 and
first resistance is now at $4.50. This market is still short-term
oversold, technically.

FINANCIALS, CURRENCIES: The June Euro currency closed 62 points lower
at .8828 today. Bears have the decided edge again as bulls have lost
all the momentum they had gained in mid-April. My bias is still that
there is not much downside left in the Euro. Look for more choppy
action in the near term. Bulls will again gain good momentum if they
can push prices above the .9075 area. Next support is now seen at
.8800. Next resistance is seen at .9000.

The June Japanese yen closed 5 points lower at .8279 today. Prices
pushed to a fresh six-week high last Friday, but bears are still in
control. Bulls are hoping for some "basing" activity at lower levels,
and that may be occurring, although it's too early to tell. Next
support now lies at the .8100 level. First resistance is seen at the
.8326 level.

The June Swiss franc closed 36 points lower today, at .5739. Bears
are in command. Still, my bias is that prices won't deteriorate much
more. Next support is seen at the .5700 level. First resistance comes
in at the .5830 level.

The June Australian dollar futures closed 37 points lower at .5150
today. Prices pushed to a fresh two-month high late last week and are
consolidating a bit this week. The bulls still have the advantage as
a five-week-old uptrend line is in place on the daily bar chart. My
bias is that the lows are in place. First resistance is now seen at
.5250. First support is now seen at .5100.

The June Canadian dollar closed 14 points lower today, at .6464.
Prices sold off some more today after the key reversal down on the
daily bar chart that was scored Monday. Bulls had good momentum, but
have lost some the past two sessions. The key reversal does not
indicate prices are headed back toward the lows seen a few weeks ago.
What it does suggest is a decent downside correction to the recent
gains will occur over the near term. This currency had been near
recent historic lows and I do not think there is much more downside.
Next resistance is seen at the .6548 level. First support is seen at
the .6450 level.

The June British pound closed 126 points lower at 1.4244. Trading
continues choppy at lower levels. This currency was not that far
above recent historic lows and I do not think there is much more
downside in the sterling. One could argue that price action the past
few weeks has been a "basing" before prices eventually turn north. A
move above the 1.4500 level would be considered a bullish "upside
breakout" from the recent congestion area. Next support is now seen
at the 1.4200 level. Next resistance comes in at the 1.4400 level.

The June U.S. dollar index closed 75 points higher at 116.24 today.
Bulls are regaining momentum. The recent double-top reversal on the
daily bar chart still favors the bears longer-term. Next resistance
lies at the 116.50 level. First support is seen at the 114.50 area.
My bias is still that a near-term top is in place in the dollar
index.

June U.S. T-bonds closed 17/32 lower today at 101 21/32. Prices
scored a bearish "outside day" down on the daily bar chart today,
whereby the high was higher and the low was lower than the previous
session's trading range, with a lower close. Bulls need to show some
resolve soon, after pushing prices well off the lows scored in late
April. A steep six-week-old downtrend line was penetrated on the
upside last week and negated. Also, a minor double-bottom reversal
has occurred on the daily bar chart. Next resistance is seen at 103
9/32. First support is seen at 101 even.

Daily Extreme Commentary is brought to you by GLOBALcharts,
INO.com's end-of-day charting software for Futures, Futures
Options and Optionable Stocks. http://www.globalcharts.com
Search the INO Store  - http://store.ino.com/
_____________________________________________________________________

T O P   N E W S
_____________________________________________________________________

STOCKS

Japan Stocks Review: Nikkei down 1.7%, banks battered
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25266
Add 1: US Equities Review: Mixed in quiet trade; Cisco boosts Nasdaq
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25264
UK Stocks Review: FTSE-100 slightly higher in lackluster session
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25272

FOREX

US FX Review: Dollar weathers poor domestic productivity data
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25268
Asia FX Review: Yen weakens on fall in Japan stocks
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25265
Europe FX Review: Poor data fails to undermine dollar
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25267

CREDIT

US Credit Review: Bond down 24/32, underperforming 2-year
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25263
Europe Credit Review: Curve unmoved; mkt awaits central banks
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25269
Japan Credit Review: June up on firm 10-year cash bonds
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25271

COMMODITIES

US Futures Summary: Cotton, copper, corn crumble; cocoa climbs
   http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25270

EXCHANGES

PCX To Trade KPMG
 and Corrections to Lafarge and Catapult
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=23560
Daily Price Limit Change For Value Line Futures
   http://news.ino.com/press/?release=23559

____________________________________________________________________________

E X T R E M E   F U T U R E S
____________________________________________________________________________

Updated every 10 minutes around the clock.
More at http://quotes.ino.com/analysis/extremes/futures/

WINNERS

BDK1   Oriented Strand Board May 2001             211.00     16.00  +8.21
CCN1   Cocoa Jul 2001                               1044        56  +5.66
XWK1   Wheat May 2001                            269 1/4     9 3/4  +3.76
RRK1   Rough Rice May 2001                         5.680     0.140  +2.53
PBK1   Frozen Pork Bellies May 2001               80.300     1.750  +2.23
ZM1    U.S. Treasury 6% Bond Jun 2001          103 184/256    2 2/32  +2.03
NDM1   NASDAQ 100 Index Jun 2001                 1940.00     37.00  +1.94
SBN1   Sugar #11 World Jul 2001                     9.10      0.15  +1.68
BOK1   Soybean Oil May 2001                        14.84      0.24  +1.64
DBK1   Butter May 2001                           189.000     3.000  +1.61

LOSERS

NTM1   Nikkei 300 Jun 2001                         283.8      -7.7  -2.64
HGN1   Copper Jul 2001                            0.7685   -0.0180  -2.29
ON1    Oats Jul 2001                                 112    -2 1/2  -2.18
CTN1   Cotton Jul 2001                             45.44     -0.98  -2.11
LBX1   Random Length Lumber Nov 2001              289.00     -5.70  -1.95
HUM1   New York Harbor Unleaded Gasoline Jun 20    1.0444   -0.0201  -1.89
CLM1   Light Sweet Crude Oil Jun 2001              27.39     -0.47  -1.69
CU1    Corn Sep 2001                             212 3/4    -3 1/4  -1.50
PNU1   Propane Sep 2001                           0.5275   -0.0075  -1.42
PLV1   Platinum Oct 2001                           599.8        -8  -1.32
____________________________________________________________________________

E X T R E M E   S T O C K S
____________________________________________________________________________

Updated every 10 minutes around the clock.
More at http://quotes.ino.com/analysis/extremes/stocks/

WINNERS

CBTE   COMMONWEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGIES                 7.04      3.33  +86.49
HELE   HELEN OF TROY LTD                            8.65      2.16  +33.91
AVN    AVANIR PHARMACEUTICALS'A'                    5.40      1.22  +29.19
GNSS   GENESIS MICROCHIP                           18.99      3.70  +24.42
TREE   LENDINGTREE INC                              6.09      1.08  +22.04
NXTV   NEXT LEVEL COMMUNICATION                     8.65      1.43  +19.62
ISSX   INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS INC               59.87      8.81  +17.23
MTH    MERITAGE CORP                               52.05      7.64  +17.20
MM     MUTUAL RISK MANAGEMENT                       8.10      1.14  +16.38
CATZ   Computer Access Tech                         5.80      0.82  +16.24

LOSERS

INOD   INNODATA CORP                                6.57     -2.40  -26.73
AMCV   AMER CLASSIC VOYAGES                         6.95     -2.48  -26.72
TRK    SPEEDWAY MOTORSPORTS                        22.80     -5.67  -19.97
AMCVP  AMCV CAP TR I                               19.00     -4.50  -19.57
CKCM   CLICK COMMERCE                              14.47     -3.37  -19.40
MAXC   MAXCO INC                                    7.50     -1.43  -19.07
NEOL   NEOPHARM INC                                22.26     -4.03  -15.68
CANI   CARREKER CORP                               17.96     -3.27  -15.41
VITL   VITAL SIGNS                                 35.05     -6.12  -14.85
MCHM   MACROCHEM CORP                               8.01     -1.25  -13.41

FREE MANAGED FUTURES & IRA RETIREMENT KIT
http://www.ino.com/specials/icm/
_____________________________________________________________________

T H A N K   Y O U
_____________________________________________________________________

Thank you for subscribing to the Extreme Markets Daily Digest from INO.com
( http://www.ino.com/ ). If you want to subscribe to our other email
services, or would like to modify your profile please visit
http://www.ino.com/email/.

To subscribe a friend, visit:
  http://www.ino.com/email/

To unsubscribe, visit:
  http://www.ino.com/email/remove/?email=mike.grigsby@enron.com&list=evening

--
Copyright 1998-2001 INO.com. All Rights Reserved.


Thank you for joining Greg Whalley at the 2001 CSC Spring Golf Classic -
Memorial Park Golf Course (Benefiting the Children's Museum)

 Whalley's Team   Enron's Team

G. Whalley    M. McConnell
B. White    T. Battaglia
J. Lavorato    G. Piper
D. Delainey    D. Black

EVENT SCHEDULE - Tuesday, April 24

10:30 a.m.  Registration
11:00 a.m.  Lunch catered by Becks Prime
11:45 a.m.  Tournament Rules for 4 Person Florida Scramble
12:00 Noon  Shotgun Start
4:00 - 5:00 p.m.  2001 Enron Jr. Golf Clinic w/ the staff of The First Tee
Program at
    Whispering Pines
5:30 p.m.  Awards Celebration

2001 ENRON JUNIOR GOLF CLINIC

The Junior Golf Clinic that will be held at the Driving Range from 4:00 p.m.
to 5:00 p.m.  Whispering Pines Golf Club will provide three instructors as
well as clubs.  The Houston Parks and Recreation Department to recruit 25
HISD 5th graders who are not enrolled in the First Tee Program to participate
in the clinic.

AWARD CATEGORIES

"Caryakid" trophies will be awarded for the following winning foursomes:

First Place  Low Gross
Second Place  Low Gross
Third Place  Low Gross
High Gross
First Place  Low Net
Second Place   Low Net
Third Place  Low Net

Hole In One Prize (Hole #11)
2001 Lexus LS430 from Sterling McCall Lexus

Longest Drive for Male and Female (Hole #10)
$100 gift certificate from Memorial Park Golf Course

Closest to the Hole (Hole #7, Hole #15)
$100 gift certificate from Memorial Park Golf Course

MULLIGAN & RAFFLE PRIZES

$20 buys 2 mulligan (maximum of 2 per player) and 1 free raffle ticket
$20 buys 5 raffle tickets
$5 buys 1 raffle ticket

Please advise if you need golf clubs.  See you there!

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor for Greg Whalley


by the way, buy it now b/c it is going to 100 by year end.

"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 08/08/2000 09:43:24 AM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: Eric Bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: ENE

Your father never listens to me, what can I say?  But, I'm very happy for
you!  How are you?  Any news on Aunt Toni?  LU-M
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Bass" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
To: <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>; <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 9:23 AM
Subject: ENE

>
>
> As Enron reaches new highs (82), I hope you took my advice to buy it at
74.  Did
> you?
>
> -E
>
>


I do not have a comment on Karen's edit, but I wanted to email the entire
group about CMUA's insistence on keeping Proposal 8 under the generation
section. (This is the section referencing potential MUNI units that could be
bid into the ISO A/S market if we can figure out a way to avoid having them
join formally). I had mentioned when this was first brought up--which was
frankly rather late in the drafting game--that I thought this would be very
controversial at ISO. Not only does ISO not concur with the notion that
there would be "over 1000 MW of addiitonal supply into A/S markets" but
placing this language in a letter to the Governor makes it look like ISO is
the obstacle to having these units available.  There is ongoing and
longstanding litigation over how to bring MUNIs into the ISO system.  I am
not uncomfortable with discussing this issue at any AB 1890 meeting, but
forcing the issue in this Governor's letter is not placing the issue on a
level playing field in my opinion.

If CMUA decides not to sign the letter without this controversial piece that
will be unfortunate.

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Edson [mailto:kedson@ns.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 1:19 PM
To: dhunter@smithandkempton.com; 'Aaron Thomas (E-mail)'; 'Allan
Lippincott'; 'Ann Cohn (E-mail)'; 'Ann Watson'; 'Anna Ferrera (E-mail)';
'Art Carter'; 'assistant for John Fielder'; 'Barbara Barkovich
(E-mail)'; 'Becky Kilbourne'; 'Bill Booth (E-mail)'; 'Bill Dombrowski';
'Bill Keese (E-mail)'; 'Bill Zobel (E-mail)'; 'Bob Foster'; 'Bob
Houston'; 'Carolyn McIntyre (E-mail)'; 'Carolyn Veal-Hunter (E-mail)';
'Catherine Hackney (E-mail)'; 'Charles Bacchi (E-mail)'; 'Craig Brown';
'Dan Carroll (E-mail)'; 'Denice Cazalet'; 'Dennis Price (E-mail)';
'Denny Samuel'; 'Dominic DiMare'; 'Dorothy Rothrock (E-mail)'; 'Ed
Yates'; 'Eloy Garcia (E-mail)'; 'Evelyn Elsesser (E-mail)'; 'Gary Heath
(E-mail)'; 'Gordon McDonald'; 'Jack Flanigan'; 'Jack Gualco (E-mail)';
'Jack Stewart'; 'James Boyd'; 'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'; 'Jeff
Dasovich (E-mail)'; 'Jerry Jordan'; 'Jim Cassie (E-mail)'; 'Jim Groniger
(E-mail)'; 'Joe Lyons (E-mail)'; 'Joe Ronan'; 'John Bridges (E-mail)';
'John Fielder'; 'John Fistolera (E-mail)'; 'John Larrea (E-mail)'; 'John
Rozsa (E-mail)'; 'John White (E-mail)'; 'Joseph Alamo'; 'Julia Wright';
'Karen Jarrell (E-mail)'; 'Karen Koyano (E-mail)'; 'Karen Lindh'; 'Karen
Mills (E-mail)'; 'Kari Harteloo'; 'Kathy Brandenburg'; 'Kay Grosulak
(E-mail)'; 'Keith McCrea (E-mail)'; 'Kevin Lynch (E-mail)'; 'Kevin Smith
(E-mail)'; 'Lawrence Lingbloom (E-mail)'; 'Lenny Goldberg (E-mail)';
'Louis Szablya (E-mail)'; 'Marc Joseph (E-mail)'; 'Marwan Masri
(E-mail)'; 'Mary McDonald (E-mail)'; 'Michael Alcantar (E-mail)'; 'Mike
Florio (E-mail)'; 'Mike Kahl'; 'Mona Petrochko (E-mail)'; 'Pete Conaty
(E-mail)'; 'Phil Nails'; 'Phil Stohr (E-mail)'; 'Ralph Cavanagh
(E-mail)'; 'Randy Chinn (E-mail)'; 'Ray Thompson (E-mail)'; 'Rick
Counihan'; 'Robert Berry (E-mail)'; 'Robin Larson (E-mail)'; 'Sheryl
Carter (E-mail)'; 'Steve Pike (E-mail)'; 'Stu Wilson (E-mail)'; 'Sue
Mara'; 'Susan Reeder (E-mail)'; 'Terry Winter (E-mail)'; 'Thomas Dinkel
(E-mail)'; 'Tim Schmelzer (E-mail)'; 'Tommy Ross'; 'Tony Braun';
'Victoria Schaefer (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: IMPORTANT -- Letter to Governor Davis

Delaney -

IEP has one minor edit to the draft letter and three edits to the
recommendations.  Three of our four suggestions are driven by legislation
sent to the Governor in the last days of session.  A redlined version is
attached.  I hope this is helpful.

(1) We propose to eliminate one proposed solution that is part of AB
970.
Our edits move to the description of AB 970 the recommendation for allowing
plants expected to come on line in 2 or 3 years to come on line earlier as
single cycle facilities from the list of solutions.

(2) We propose to move the proposal to expedite renewable generation to
a
comment that signing AB 995/SB 1194 will expedite more than 500 MW of new
renewable generation by next summer.  (This number is based on a CEC
letter.)

(3) We propose to consolidate solutions 4 and 5 since both involve
changes
or additions to existing plants.

(4) Finally, we propose to modify the description of the CEC's expedited
siting process to reflect AB 970 more accurately.

If you have any questions, please call.

Karen Edson
kedson@ns.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Delaney Hunter [mailto:dhunter@smithandkempton.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 5:03 PM
To: Aaron Thomas (E-mail); 'Allan Lippincott'; Ann Cohn (E-mail); 'Ann
Watson'; Anna Ferrera (E-mail); 'Art Carter'; 'assistant for John
Fielder'; Barbara Barkovich (E-mail); 'Becky Kilbourne'; Bill Booth
(E-mail); 'Bill Dombrowski'; Bill Keese (E-mail); Bill Zobel (E-mail);
'Bob Foster'; 'Bob Houston'; Carolyn McIntyre (E-mail); Carolyn
Veal-Hunter (E-mail); Catherine Hackney (E-mail); Charles Bacchi
(E-mail); 'Craig Brown'; Dan Carroll (E-mail); 'Denice Cazalet'; Dennis
Price (E-mail); 'Denny Samuel'; 'Dominic DiMare'; Dorothy Rothrock
(E-mail); 'Ed Yates'; Eloy Garcia (E-mail); Evelyn Elsesser (E-mail);
Gary Heath (E-mail); 'Gordon McDonald'; 'Jack Flanigan'; Jack Gualco
(E-mail); 'Jack Stewart'; 'James Boyd'; Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail); Jeff
Dasovich (E-mail); 'Jerry Jordan'; Jim Cassie (E-mail); Jim Groniger
(E-mail); Joe Lyons (E-mail); 'Joe Ronan'; John Bridges (E-mail); 'John
Fielder'; John Fistolera (E-mail); John Larrea (E-mail); John Rozsa
(E-mail); John White (E-mail); 'Joseph Alamo'; 'Julia Wright'; Karen
Edson (E-mail); Karen Jarrell (E-mail); Karen Koyano (E-mail); 'Karen
Lindh'; Karen Mills (E-mail); 'Kari Harteloo'; 'Kathy Brandenburg'; Kay
Grosulak (E-mail); Keith McCrea (E-mail); Kevin Lynch (E-mail); Kevin
Smith (E-mail); Lawrence Lingbloom (E-mail); Lenny Goldberg (E-mail);
Louis Szablya (E-mail); Marc Joseph (E-mail); Marwan Masri (E-mail);
Mary McDonald (E-mail); Michael Alcantar (E-mail); Mike Florio (E-mail);
'Mike Kahl'; Mona Petrochko (E-mail); Pete Conaty (E-mail); 'Phil
Nails'; Phil Stohr (E-mail); Ralph Cavanagh (E-mail); Randy Chinn
(E-mail); Ray Thompson (E-mail); 'Rick Counihan'; Robert Berry (E-mail);
Robin Larson (E-mail); Sheryl Carter (E-mail); Steve Pike (E-mail); Stu
Wilson (E-mail); 'Sue Mara'; Susan Reeder (E-mail); Terry Winter
(E-mail); Thomas Dinkel (E-mail); Tim Schmelzer (E-mail); 'Tommy Ross';
'Tony Braun'; Victoria Schaefer (E-mail)
Subject: IMPORTANT -- Letter to Governor Davis

Folks-
At today's meeting, those Group members who attended agreed that we should
indeed send the letter with changes reflecting the new legislation. Attached
is the newest draft of such a letter. We need to send this letter out FRIDAY
so in order to do that please look over the letter carefully and let me know
if your organization wishes to be included as a signatory. I need every set
of eyes out there to look this letter over for spelling, grammar and
content -- my eyes have seen it too many times and are apt to miss things.
So, here is the process ---

Let me know of any minor changes ASAP. If there are content changes please
email them to the ENTIRE group for sign off. Please understand that we want
to send this FRIDAY so we do not have a lot of time to make changes. When I
have a final draft I will ask people to fax signatures or send originals to
me by Friday.Thank you all for your help with this letter. We could not have
done it with out you.

We will be scheduling our next general meeting for mid October. Also, we
have finalized the dates for the Annual Retreat and will be sending out
packets with all the details next week. DJ and I are working on the agenda
so if you have a specific topic you would like covered please let us know.
As always, please send me an email or give me a call if you have any
concerns or questions about the letter or any other matter.

Thanks,
Delaney


FYI

WPS owns about 20 mw of Yarmouth 4 (often referred to as Wyman)  (9800 heat rate) in Maine and is making this indicative offer to CPs for cal 02...

$5 capacity payment plus actual fuel costs (#6, 0.7% sulfur) - they report a current bid at around $4.75

I have asked them to provide history of : forced outage, actual oil costs compared to index, reduced output due to congestion constraints (this last summer), and other information. Until we get this and other information I told them we could not properly evaluate the value of this opportunity.

Woody


Michael Hayes - cell phone - 781-367-8828


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000 04:17
PM ---------------------------

Steve List <slist@Campbell.com> on 06/26/2000 12:32:02 PM
To: "'jarnold@enron.com'" <jarnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: trading

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve List
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 1:26 PM
> To: 'jarnol1@ect.enron.com'
> Subject: trading
>
>
>   John,
>
>   I hope all is well down in Houston, though it would seem your baseball
> team is, well, terrible.
>   We may be close to resolving our internal issues as our CEO indicated on
> Friday. We are awaiting some
>   confirmation but it seems we are close. How is the credit standing for
> Enron?
>   Is there a chance of upgrade or well, you can tell me the status.
>
>   Thanks
>
>   Steve List


Here are the 2000 results we discussed.
---------------------- Forwarded by John Sherriff/LON/ECT on 05/12/2000 17:49
---------------------------
   Niamh O'Regan                05/12/2000 16:15

To: Mark E Lindsey/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc: Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Beth Apollo/LON/ECT@ECT, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen Wood/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Enron Europe Response to 2000 Objectives

Mark,

Please find attached Enron Europe's Response to our 2000 Objectives.

If you have any questions or would like any further information please
contact me on xt 37094 or Stephen Wood on xt 34738.

Regards,

Niamh


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 09:45 AM -----

	Craig Young
	10/02/2000 09:21 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT,
tj.pimpinelli@mglondon.com
		 cc: Craig Young/NY/ECT@ECT, Jon Barrett/EU/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: United States Swaps

Hi Sara

We are Enron Trading Services Inc. (FCM) in New York. We came along with the
MG purchase and report through London.

We handle clear/broker US Futures and act as an IB for Enron Metals Ltd. Our
client base is the Americas with an overlap to Houston.

We would like for funds and commercial clients to have one Swap document
including several commodities and Enron units. For example we understand from
Per that you are working a document for Catequil that should include metal.

Justin

 Could you advise

Thanks
Craig Young
212-715-2342


Fall sounds good to me.  In talking with Sue today, she stated that Dr. Rao
would like to inform the winners of the scholarships by letter from him and
that it will most likely be another week before he does so.  I asked her to
contact me when the letter is going out to the students so that we can follow
up with either a letter or phone call from some of us at Enron.  I will keep
Rick Causey, the other interviewers and you (or someone in your office)
updated on the timing of notifying the winners.  --Sally

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Elyse Kalmans @ ENRON                           04/06/2000 01:54 PM

To: Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Lee, Charla Stuart/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Alexandra Saler/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: RE: Enron MBA Excellence Awards - Dinner

I will plan the event for the fall - I'll be back from maternity leave and we
can get PR on campus for the event as well.  Thanks!  Elyse

Sharron Westbrook

04/06/2000 01:43 PM
To: Elyse Kalmans/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: Enron MBA Excellence Awards - Dinner

Rick won't be back in the office until Monday but I am sure that this will be
ok with him.  His schedule is really tight for the next month.

	From:  Elyse Kalmans                           04/06/2000 01:33 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy Lee, Charla
Stuart/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alexandra Saler/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RE: Enron MBA Excellence Awards - Dinner

Sally and Rick:  I am fine with having the dinner in the fall if y'all are ok
with that.  Actually, it will give us more flexibility to plan and get great
attendance.  Please let me know your thoughts, and I will communicate
directly with Sue White.

Thanks!  Elyse
---------------------- Forwarded by Elyse Kalmans/Corp/Enron on 04/06/2000
01:29 PM ---------------------------

Susan White <Susan.White@bus.utexas.edu> on 04/06/2000 10:19:12 AM
To: "'Elyse.Kalmans@enron.com'" <Elyse.Kalmans@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Enron MBA Excellence Awards - Dinner

Hi Elyse - I just spoke with Ramesh Rao (associate dean).  He has not yet
made the Excellence Fund awards, which are also part of the Enron endowment.
He would like to have the dinner in the fall, when all of the awardees have
been chosen.  He felt that a dinner the end of April would conflict with a
major E-commerce conference we're having here, and the Enron awards would
get the attention they deserve in the fall.  The other advantage of a fall
dinner is that the new students will be here, and if we have a big
announcement then, they can see what they have to look forward to.  Will
this work for you?  Thanks.  Sue

-----Original Message-----
From: Elyse.Kalmans@enron.com [mailto:Elyse.Kalmans@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 9:05 AM
To: Susan White
Subject: RE: Enron MBA Excellence Awards - Dinner

Sue:  Thanks for your email.  In speaking with Rick Causey, the only day
that he is available is Monday, April 24.  In speaking with Sally Beck, I
know that you are confirming the 3 winners and will get me their info once
they have been chosen.  If you don't mind seeing who from the university is
available on the 24th, that would be great.  Our other option is to have it
another evening that week or rescheduling for the fall after classes begin.

As I mentioned before, I am expecting a baby two weeks from today, so I'd
love to have as much of this wrapped up before I pass it on to someone else
on my team.

Thanks for your help!
Elyse


Start Date: 1/24/02; HourAhead hour: 19;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


I'll be there, too.

"David Hunt" <drhunt@watervalley.net> on 06/01/2001 05:01:40 PM
Please respond to <drhunt@watervalley.net>
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE:

I believe so! I have it on my calendar at 11:00 a.m.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 2:35 PM
To: drhunt@watervalley.net
Subject: Re:

David,

Do you know if we are meeting on Monday?  I haven't heard the final word.

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 06/14/2000
02:18 PM ---------------------------

"Jacqueline Blanchard" <Jacqueline.Blanchard@dvn.com> on 06/14/2000 01:49:30
PM
To: <Ami.Chokshi@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: SS 154

 - TEXT.htm


Here is Don Black's presentation on his price risk management structure.
Ben


As many of you know, we recently changed Internet Account Access providers
and have had problems with the service including slow access, or no access at
times. We realize many of you depend on QuickLink to handle your transactions
daily and sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this has caused.

It appears the problems are related to the interface between our home banking
provider and our host processor. We assure you that we are on top of the
situation and are working diligently to see that the New QuickLink is fully
operational as soon as possible.

Although we are working to resolve this issue quickly, we want you to be able
to take care of any financial transactions right away if needed. Here are a
couple of other options:

1) Call QuickTeller, our free Automated Phone Service, which is available
24-hours a day. QuickTeller allows you to make transfers, verify cleared
checks and posted deposits, check account history and more. QuickTeller can
be accessed at 713-853-1466, or 800-321-1396.  If you need your QuickTeller
P.I.N., please contact us at 713-853-6242, or 800-241-5871.

2) Call us at 713-853-6242, or 800-241-5871, and we will be glad to provide
account information over the phone.

3) Or, send your transaction request to us via E-mail from either our
Intranet Site, or Internet Site at efcu@enron.com.

We appreciate your understanding and patience, and assure you QuickLink will
be fully operational as soon as possible.


Mark,

Sorry that we could not get together before I left.? I do not have anything
scheduled for the week of August 7, so let me know of a convenient time for
you.? I look forward to meeting you.

Paul E. Pryzant
832-754-4514 (cell)
713-681-8622 (direct)
713-973-9224 (home)
ppryzant@chematch.com
ppry@hal-pc.org (home)


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 09/14/2000 05:56 PM
---------------------------

Enron-admin@FSDDataSvc.com on 09/07/2000 11:51:52 AM
To: scott.neal@enron.com
cc:
Subject: TIME SENSITIVE: Executive Impact & Influence Program Survey

Executive Impact & Influence Program
* IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED - Do Not Delete *

As part of the Executive Impact and Influence Program, each participant
is asked to gather input on the participant's own management styles and
practices as experienced by their immediate manager, each direct report,
and up to eight peers/colleagues.

You have been requested to provide feedback for a participant attending
the next program.  Your input (i.e., a Self assessment, Manager assessment,
Direct Report assessment, or Peer/Colleague assessment) will be combined
with the input of others and used by the program participant to develop an
action plan to improve his/her management styles and practices.

It is important that you complete this assessment
NO LATER THAN CLOSE OF BUSINESS Thursday, September 14.

Since the feedback is such an important part of the program, the participant
will be asked to cancel his/her attendance if not enough feedback is
received.  Therefore, your feedback is critical.

To complete your assessment, please click on the following link or simply
open your internet browser and go to:

http://www.fsddatasvc.com/enron

Your unique ID for each participant you have been asked to rate is:

Unique ID - Participant
EWUF8P    - Phillip Allen

If you experience technical problems, please call Dennis Ward at
FSD Data Services, 713-942-8436.  If you have any questions about this
process,
you may contact Debbie Nowak at Enron, 713-853-3304, or Christi Smith at
Keilty, Goldsmith & Company, 858-450-2554.

Thank you for your participation.


meet for a drink after work?

-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Thomas W. [mailto:ttt@cpuc.ca.gov]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 12:21 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:

Things is good. Our new ORA director is really engaging and starting to make some shifts around here.  good to have someone who cares, is competent, and tough.

I'm off the bottle for a few weeks to get a true read on my cholesterol. Seems alcohol is processed first by the liver and is converted quite readily into fats that then become precursors to cholesterol ....  Feels good, easy to do......

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:08 AM
To: Thompson, Thomas W.
Subject: RE:

talked to karen.  thought we'd do bolinas weekend after your b-day.  andw e're around the weekend of your b-day, it's just that i've got class all day that saturday.  i think if karen's overly uncomfortable, we should just do the four of us.  we can always do dinner with david and nina.

how's things?

-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Thomas W. [mailto:ttt@cpuc.ca.gov]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 11:53 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:

When you guys going to the dome? will we be able to get together for a few minutes before you depart on Friday?  Perhaps we could sit in front of one of your PCs and look a possible weekend spots for my b-day.

Also, I'd like to discuss the david thing....I'm interested in your view......

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000 08:57
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Kyle Etter" <kyle_etter@hotmail.com>
10/29/2000 11:34 PM

To: Susan.M.Scott@enron.com
cc:
Subject:

Hey, how was the weekend?  Did you at least catch up a little on your rest?
You had one heck of a week but then again I guess that is just old hat for
you.  We had a good time on Saturday.  It is always fun to be on sixth
street close to halloween, even more freaks come out.

OK enough stalling.  I just thought something needed to be said about
wednesday.  We could just go on and act like nothing happened and probably
never see or talk to one another ever again.  I don't like that solution.
My personality is to go with the flow but by doing this you sometimes miss
out on opportunities.  So the traditional me would say it was just one night
and didn't really mean anything, which could possibly be true.  One thing
that I learned from you is that you have to take chances and don't be
intimidated.  You have a very strong personality and I can see where
somebody could easily be intimidated.  Along with that comes someone who is
smart, attractive, outgoing, and somebody who can fit in anywhere, whether
your at the local honky-tonk or at some gala.  The one thing I know about
you is that your going to be successful and I don't mean in the monetary way
because I know that isn't high on the priority list.  I also know that if I
would have never left the company then I probably wouldn't be sitting here
writing this email.

When I was thinking about leaving I didn't think it was going to be that
hard.  I really didn't like the way my life was going and I knew I needed a
change.  Then I sit back and think of all the things I'm going to miss.
People bad talk risk all the time, with the long hours and little respect
you sometimes get it is understandable.  The thing I'm going to miss the
most are all the friendships I have built working in that group.  Sometimes
the toughest times are when you really get to know someone.  But the hardest
thing now is that I will not be around you.  I know that sounds really bad
but the honest truth is I have liked you ever since we started sitting next
to each other.  We had this chemistry and it made the job a little easier
knowing you were there.  I really think the best times I had in Houston were
those couple of weeks we went out after work to have a few drinks.  I also
knew that since we worked together that it probably wasn't the best thing to
get involved.  I really regret that decision right about now.

Alright I guess I have said a lot of sappy stuff and you should know that
I'm not usually like this, which is probably why I didn't call you to share
this info.  I do think some things need to be said or else the other person
will never know.  You are a great person and even though the chips are
stacked against me I needed to let you know this.  I understand that your
under a lot of stress right now and by no means do I want to add on.  The
one thing I wish you would take away from this is that if your 35 and still
looking then you need not look any further.

So I apologize for using this forum to express this I really wanted to talk
to you in person on Friday but I just didn't get a chance much less know
where to start. I hope we stay in touch and if you ever want to go to Gruene
Hall then let me know.  I also don't want to be put in one of your stalker
categories so take this for whatever you want, please don't think of me as
the next SP.

Take care and have a good week.

Kyle

By the way I think that good-bye would have to rank in top of all times, at
least it is number one in my book.

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Paulett,
	What is the phone number for that room? Murray O'Neil calling in from Portland.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Paulett
Sent:	Tuesday, July 31, 2001 6:29 AM
To:	Holmes, Sean; Grumulaitis, Paige; Dickson, Glenn; Dayao, Anthony; Layton, Phil; Mills, Scott; Apollo, Beth; Sharma, Larrissa; Gullion, Steven; Taylor, Todd; Busby, Todd; Richter, Jeff; O'Neil, Murray P.; Stokley, Chris; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Herndon, Rogers; Perry, Todd; Pierce, John; Ha, Kenny
Cc:	Palma, Viviana; Stevenson, Yvette; Carrizales, Blanca; Coleman, Debra; Finnels-Neal, La Donna; Liscano, Christina; Lair, Tasha; Bass, Kathy
Subject:	Systems Meeting

REMINDER:

	Calendar Entry

Brief description:
Date:
Time:

Systems Meeting - Intermediate Solutions & Intramonth Book - EB8c1
07/31/2001
02:00 PM - 03:30 PM

Detailed description:
Sent for Sean Holmes/Paige Grumulaitis/Glenn Dickson

MEETING RESCHEDULE NOTICE:
THIS IS AN IMPORTANT MEETING, PLEASE PLAN TO ATTEND

Please respond to this invitation.

Thanks,
Paulett

Invitations have been sent to:	Sean A Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, Paige Grumulaitis/HOU/EES@EES, Glenn Dickson/HOU/EES@EES, Anthony Dayao/HOU/EES@EES, Phil Layton/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Mills/HOU/EES@EES, Beth Apollo/Enron@EnronXGate, Kenny Ha/HOU/EES@EES, Larrissa Sharma/HOU/EES@EES, Steven Gullion/HOU/EES@EES, Todd Taylor/HOU/EES@EES, Todd Busby/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Richter/Enron@EnronXGate, Murray P ONeil/ENRON@enronXgate, Chris Stokley/ENRON@enronXgate, Berney C Aucoin/Enron@EnronXGate, Rogers Herndon/Enron@EnronXGate, Todd Perry/Enron@EnronXGate, John A Pierce/HOU/EES@EES
Optional invitees:	Viviana Palma/HOU/EES@EES, Yvette Stevenson/HOU/EES@EES, Blanca Carrizales/Enron@EnronXGate, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Debra Coleman/ENRON@enronXgate, La Donna Finnels-Neal/Enron@EnronXGate, Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES
_________________________________________________________________________
This meeting repeats   starting on    (if the date occurs on a weekend the meeting ).


Is there an Icon I can send to Marcus to get into the ENA Legal Online
Database.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 03:04 PM -----

	ARSystem <ARSystem@mailman.enron.com>
	03/20/2001 02:28 PM

		 To: "tana.jones@enron.com" <tana.jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Request Closed: Access Request for marcus.nettelton@enron.com

The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed
or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000024480&Page=
MyReq.


Here is the clean and red-lined version of section1.
Ben


U.S. Utility and Non-Utility Power Directories

Click Here To Download Order Form and Additional Information

http://www.pmaconference.com/powerdirectories.pdf

SPECIAL PACKAGE PRICE:  Normally $895 each, get BOTH Directories AND a full year of Merchant Power Monthly (normally $295) for only $1090!    Act Now!

2000 US ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY DIRECTORY ON CD-ROM

More than 8,000 listings including: name, address, phone, fax, email, website address, key personnel, brief company synopsis, financial and operating information, generating stations, services provided, sales and usage, plant details, key articles, and much more!

Listed by: Holding companies, investor-owned electric utilities, Municipal and other publicly owned utilities, rural electric cooperatives, Federal, state and district systems, associations, councils and power pools, Canadian utilities, regulatory agencies, Indexes (company, geographic, personnel)

CD-ROM Features: Generate reports, pull mailing lists, analyze data, and produce queries.

2001 U.S. Non-Utility Power Directory on CD-ROM

This revised and updated directory includes more than 2700 non-utility plant listings, including owners and operators. Detailed information (where available) of each plant includes contacts, address, phone and fax numbers, installed capacity, year installed, number of employees, net generation, number of units, prime mover, fuel type and detailed hydro attributes.

Company information includes company name, contact, address, phone and fax numbers, website and revenues (if available).

This directory is fully exportable. Each CD includes the following formats: MSAccess, MSExcel, Dbase and DOS-Text.

Click Here To Download Order Form and Additional Information

http://www.pmaconference.com/powerdirectories.pdf

This email has been sent to lindy.donoho@enron.com,
 by PowerMarketers.com.

Visit our Subscription Center to edit your interests or unsubscribe.
http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=1000838503237&ea=lindy.donoho@enron.com

View our privacy policy: http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp

Powered by
Constant Contact(R)
www.constantcontact.com


Please see attached file titled "MWindRiver" first.

 - MWindRiv.DOC
 - Blacklin.DOC
 - Blacklin.DOC
 - Blacklin.DOC
 - Blacklin.DOC
 - Blacklin.DOC
 - Blacklin.DOC
 - Blacklin.DOC
 - Blacklin.DOC
 - Blacklin.DOC
 - Blacklin.DOC
 - Blacklin.DOC
 - Blacklin.DOC
 - WindRive.DOC
 - Blacklin.DOC
 - Blacklin.DOC


lets talk in am--did we pay SET to forgo their option on the Gallup
space????? ON the "gross margin" spreads mentioned in 3, do we hedge the fuel
componenet or is that the customer's problem?  Pls print this page for me as
I can't.   DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/12/2001
06:00 PM ---------------------------

Jeffery Fawcett
02/12/2001 04:13 PM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Perry Frazier/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ted Chavez/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dennis Lee/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: New K, Amendment- Sempra, Amendment- Calpine

Attached for your review and approval are three (3) Agreements:

1.  New contract with Sempra Energy Trading for 35,000 MMBtu/d, SJ Blanco to
SoCal Needles, 2 years, Jan. '04 thru Dec. '05, at a Negotiate Rate of
$0.50/MMBtu, plus applicable fuel.  Sempra replaces Dynegy who holds this
capacity under an Index-Index deal for cal. '03.

2.  Amendment to Sempra Energy Trading, Sempra waives option to increase
MAXDTQ under existing Gallup contract from Jan. 1, '04 thru Apr. 30, '05
(contract termination date, no ROFR rights).

3.  Amendment to existing Calpine contract, extends term for two (2) years,
Jan. '04 thru Dec. '05 on existing Index-Index deal for cal. '03.   Path is
SJ Blanco to Calpine South Point del. at Cal. border.

Agreements (nos. 1, 3) are in credit and capacity approval.

Expedited approval of the Calpine contract is requested as it is an Index -
Index transport that will [likely] be hedged immediately upon ETS mgmnt.
approval and Calpine execution.  Currently, spread swaps would result in
$0.85/MMBtu gross margin for '05, and $0.77/MMBtu for '04.


Please give me a call this week I need some info.


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,

Attached you will find an excel document. The outage contained within is
a rescheduled outage. Your daily delivery will still contain this
outage.

In addition to the excel document, there is a dbf file that is formatted
like your daily delivery you receive nightly. This will enable you to
load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me
know. Thanks.

Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR
ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION,
DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE
DELETE IT.

 - OUTAGE.dbf
 - 112001R.xls


In case folks haven't already heard through other sources, a reliable person
told me that PG&E is hedged for core gas requirements:

financial--for 45% of core volumes at prices "in the single digits/decatherm"
physical--for 15% of core volumes (via storage) at prices "less than the
financial hedge"

SDG&E is naked.

SoCalGas is likely in the same boat as SDG&E, or worse, since they optioned
core's storage gas to noncore customers, and, those customers are exercising.