Carol,

I have been working with Mexican tax counsel regarding the online issues and
received written advice from them yesterday, which I'll summarize and provide
to all of you ASAP.  Best regards.

   Carol St Clair                06/30/2000 11:10 AM

To: Jaime Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Update

Jaime:
Here is a message that I received from our counsel.  Again, I and they are
just focusing on the Enron Online issues and Sara is handling the issues
relating to doing transactions offline between Enron Mexico and the Mexican
counterparties.  I will suggest to our counsel that we have a call mid next
week involving you, me and them.  What is your availability on Wednesday?
Alos, who from credit are you dealing with and are they aware that we
probably will not be able to in a bankruptcy situation offset amounts owed
with respect to the online and offline transactions?

Jeff:
Are there any tax issues that we need to be concerned about regarding the
online piece of this?
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 11:00 AM -----

	Carol St Clair
	06/30/2000 08:05 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Update

Mark and David:
Here is the status of research our counsel in Mexico is doing re online
issues.
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 08:04 AM -----

	"Pablo Perezalonso" <pperezalonso@rhm.com.mx>
	06/29/2000 07:41 PM

		 To: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Update

Carol:

We are working on the questionaire, but we have been delayed. We will have an
initial draft by the middle of next week.

Regards

>>> "Carol St Clair" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com> 06/29/00 04:41PM >>>

Pablo and Jose:
Could one of you e-mail me with an update of how your review of the online
issues and documents is going and when we may be able to visit about your
views
on these matters?  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


The ClickAtHome Database shows that you have placed an order with Dell
Computer with an order number of 529557217. Please read below for
instructions:

1.  If this is correct, enjoy your computer!
    You can check your order status by clicking here:
      http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/index.asp

      ** For questions about your order/changes/problems,
         call 1-866-220-3355 **

2.  If you did NOT place an order with Dell for the ClickAtHome program,
    please email enron@avenueb2e.com or call 713-895-9087 to report
    the incorrect order on your behalf.

Thank you!

ClickAtHome Team!


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/23/99 10:09
AM ---------------------------

jwhodge@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/23/99 08:45:51 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Storage Questions

Here are the answers to your questions:

1.  Cove Point LNG is a peaking facility.  There are three 10-day peaking
contracts for 50,000 Dthd each or a total of 150,000 Dthd of peaking
capability
by delivery from the Cove Point pipeline into the east side of TCO's system.
The gas can also go directly into Washington Gas Light or into PEPCO's Chalk
Point electric generation facility.  The variable transport cost on Cove Point
LNG is less than $0.005/Dth.  This gas was hedged by CES as baseload
withdrawal
during the January 1999, but can be withdrawn any time before the end of the
contracts which is 2/29/2000.

2.  The TCO storage is the CES retail storage.  Enron's contract with CES
retail contains the withdrawal schedule for this storage.  I would work with
Ed
McMichael's group who should be getting this schedule from CES Retail.

cgerman@ect.enron.com on 12/23/99 08:22:40 AM
Please respond to cgerman@ect.enron.com

To: Scott Goodell [NOTES.sgoodel]@LMSOV
cc: John Hodge/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, djunek@ect.enron.com
Subject: Storage Questions

I have 2 storage questions for now.

1.  Cove Point LNG - it's my understanding that this is a LNG peaking
facility.
The current balance is 1,500,000 dth.  Did you have a withdrawal schedule or
were you going to use this as peaking gas?

2.  TCO contract 63304 - has capacity of 7 BCF, and I think your current
storage
balance is about 5 BCF.  What is your withdrawal schedule for Jan??

thanks


CES has a synthetic storage deal with Equitable Gas Company on Texas
Eastern.  CES gave Equitable 100,000 dth in April 1999 and Equitable is
giving CES the gas back in January 2000 in Tetco M2.  According to my new
best buddy Fred at Equitable, CES will pay Equitable $.65 /dth after the
January transaction is complete.

Here are my questions/comments;

1.  David - please look at the new deal I created for this exchange (deal
146788).  The existing deal (deal 138741) is set up as a pipeline exchange.
I believe the counterparty should be Equitable Gas Company which is the LDC.
If it looks OK to you, I will kill the old deal and add the volumes to the
new deal.  Please let me know ASAP.

2.  Linda/David - do we have CES's contract with Equitable?  I would like to
see a) what CES was paying Equitable for this deal and b) when the payment
was due.

3.  David/Stephanie - if the deal is structured the way Fred described it
above, where do we put the $.65 fee at?

4.  Linda - Fred has not received any assignment notices regarding CES
deals.  He doesn't know if he should bill CES or Enron North America.  Who
should he talk to about that??

Please forward this email to others that may need to see it.

Thanks


FYI.  This morning I talked to Karen Moore and explained that we were going to meet with Karen Denne to discuss the name of the department.  I told her a little about the project and she offered to provide me her draft of a communication plan.  She provided me with a draft plan this afternoon and I will review it over the weekend to develop message points for the communication plan.

Valeria

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Karen Moore <karenjo_hart@yahoo.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 1:47 PM
To:	Hope, Valeria A.
Subject:

Hi Valeria,
I have put together a marketing and communications plan for you.  Items can be deleted or added. If you have a moment today, please give me a call and we can talk about the messaging point.  Your message will drive all of the marketing and communication pieces.  If you have any questions please give me a call at X53231.
I am in D.C. but my phone is forwarded to my house!
Look forward to speaking with you.
Thanks,
Karen

Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messengerhttp://phonecard.yahoo.com/
 - MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS PLAN FOR OLER.doc


Jeff
FYI-Negative publicity for the Pompano project in a big way-Roger
----- Forwarded by Roger Balog/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 02:07 PM -----

	Kathleen Carnahan@ENRON
	12/13/2000 01:37 PM

		 To: Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Florida publicity

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/search/results?query=enron


Do not book anything related to Arcor until I say so.

-----Original Message-----
From: Collonges, Remi
Sent: Fri 3/30/2001 12:13 PM
To: Kishkill, Joe; Lavorato, John
Cc: Vladimir Gorny@ECT
Subject: Modesto Maranzana Generation License

The transfer of the Arcor plant and the assignment of the 6 Arcor PPAs are now official.  Therefore, next week, we will:

1.  Book the 6 Arcor contracts on the MTM book (Argentina power)

2.  Review with Vlady the best way to record the EPEC contract and the power plant spread option.

Remi

---------------------- Forwarded by Remi Collonges/SA/Enron on 03/30/2001 01:31 PM ---------------------------

Cristian Folgar

03/29/2001 11:59 AM

To:     Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Julian Poole/SA/Enron@Enron, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron

cc:     Guillermo Canovas/SA/Enron@Enron, Mario Aguilar Benitez/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject:        Modesto Maranzana Generation License

This is to inform that we received yesterday a hard copy of Resolution SE N? 4, that transfers the Generation License for Modesto Maranzana Power Plant from Arcor to us.

We have already talked with technical people at CAMMESA, and they told us that with this Resolution, they will accept (starting in April) the contract signed between ESA and ECEA to back up the PPAs that ECEA has signed with some Arcor's industrial plants.

I especially want to highlight the support that Mario Aguilar Benitez gave to the regulatory team to get this Resolution signed.

CF


Ditto credit -- except
Electric District Number Eight and Kensington Energy, Ltd. not authorized to trade US power -- not current CPs/not FERC approved.  (I'm following up with Tracy by this e-mail to look into Electric District Number Eight.)

Tracy -- what do you know about Electric District Number Eight?

Leslie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:03 AM
To:	Aronowitz, Alan; Calo, Andrea; Cooper, Tracy J. (EBS); Gaffney, Chris; Hansen, Leslie; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Johnston, Greg; Keohane, Peter; Korkmas, Deb; McBride, Jane; Minns, David; Nettelton, Marcus; Powell, Mark; Rossi, Robbi; Van Hooser, Steve; Viverito, John
Subject:	FW: EOL and Clickpaper Approvals for 10-16-01

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 6:09 PM
To:	Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Lebeau, Maria; Escamilla, Albert; Curry, Ken
Subject:	EOL and Clickpaper Approvals for 10-16-01

Please see attached.

 << File: EOL 10-16-01.xls >>
Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835


I am putting through an offsetting trade where I am selling 75,000 to you at
flat.  You will recieve confirms for both trades.


Hi Guys,

I'm sending this to you as an FYI because your names were on the deals I had
to fix.  We have two transmission deals with Snohomish PUD (see 469770.1 and
469791.1) that were entered under the Snohomissup counterparty.  When
searching for the counterparty in the listing, please be extra careful about
the one you actually choose.  If the wrong counterparty is added (even if
it's the same customer, just a different moniker, as in this case), it will
send someone (usually me or Virginia) on an unnecessary wild goose chase.

Not hollering, just asking you to be careful.

Caroline


---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 09:00
AM ---------------------------

Eric Thode@ENRON
04/30/2001 04:47 PM
To: Mark Frevert/Enron@EnronXGate, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey
McMahon/Enron@EnronXGate, Raymond Bowen/enron@enronxgate, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula Rieker/Enron@EnronXGate, Elizabeth
Ivers/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Glenn Wright/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Nicki Daw/Enron@EnronXGate, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sue
Ford/Enron@EnronXGate, Marsha Schiller/Enron@EnronXGate, Cindy
Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: REVISED DRAFT: Enron and Huntco Steel

Attached is the latest draft of the Enron/Huntco release.  We are working
towards releasing this in the next hour or so, or upon approval of all
parties.  If you have questions, please call me at ext. 3-9053.

Eric

---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 09:00
AM ---------------------------
From: Michelle Nelson/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/30/2001 08:34 PM
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Monday's P&L


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2000 02:01
PM ---------------------------

Angie Zeman@ENRON
04/25/2000 01:53 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Pipeline Restriction

---------------------- Forwarded by Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron on 04/25/2000
01:48 PM ---------------------------

Ora_L_Ash@CNGT.CNG.COM on 04/25/2000 01:44:29 PM
To: CUSTOMERS@CNG.COM
cc:
Subject: Pipeline Restriction

                                   ORA L. ASH
                                CUSTOMER ANALYST
                             DOMINION TRANSMISSION
                 P. O. BOX 2450,  CLARKSBURG,  WV   26302-2450
                        E-MAIL:  ORA_L_ASH@CNGT.CNG.COM
                     PHONE:  304-623-8546  FAX 304-623-8321
                               PAGER 304-987-3254

                              PIPELINE RESTRICTION

     Beginning Thursday, April 27,2000, at 10:00 a.m. est., there will be no
capacity for any
interruptible or secondary transportation delivered from Iroquois Gas
Transmission to Dominion
Transmission at Canajoharie.  This restriction will remain in place until
further notice.


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2001 09:40
AM ---------------------------

SOblander@carrfut.com on 05/04/2001 09:31:27 AM
To: soblander@carrfut.com
cc:
Subject: option candlesticks technical paper

Several people have asked how to read the Carr Futures option candlestick
charts.
Attached is a research note discussing tracking and trading option
volatility.

(See attached file: Tracking and Trading Nat Gas Vols.pdf)

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com
 - Tracking and Trading Nat Gas Vols.pdf


Thanks, the talking points are helpful.  Mark


Enron: Withdrawing 300 MW From Summer Peaking Program
Wednesday, November 1, 2000 02:18 PM

	?Mail this article to a friend

	(Corrected 1:59 pm)

	NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--In response to new California power market rules
proposed Wednesday by the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Enron
Corp (ENE, news, msgs) has canceled some new generator projects it was
discussing with the state's electric grid operator, Enron said.
	The generators that are no longer financially feasible would have amounted to
300 megawatts of new generation installed in California next spring, Enron
said. The company, however, continues to negotiate other new generator
projects with the California Independent System Operator.
	The FERC Wednesday proposed limiting the California Power Exchange's price
setting mechanism to $150 a megawatt-hour. The preliminary order could become
a federal mandate by the end of the year, after the FERC takes comments from
the public, or it could be modified.
	Enron and 13 other companies, meanwhile, are in final negotiations with the
ISO for the new peaking capacity for next summer. The ISO plans to pay a
total of $255 million a year for three years to the power companies for
installing the new generators, which the power companies will own.
	In addition, California's three investor-owned utilities would pay the
generators for any electricity the new generators produce. Pricing for the
power would likely be based on the daily price set by the state-chartered
CalPX.
	"There's too much uncertainty that we would be able to recover the cost
associated with those specific projects. For the purposes of making capital
commitments, we view this as a $150 price cap," Enron's Mark Palmer said.
	Earlier Wednesday, the ISO's chief operating officer, Terry Winter, expressed
concern that FERC's proposed new rules could jeopardize some of the projects.
	FERC's proposals Wednesday are the result of a two-month investigation of
California's wholesale electricity market, where prices this summer were
three times what they were a year earlier. To meet the state's rising demand
for power, California's three utilities have paid billions of dollars more
than anticipated to independent power producers in order to keep the lights
on.
	By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com
	Quote for referenced ticker symbols: EIX, ENE, PCG, SRE

	, 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Ryan could you make contact with Jesus and be his contact for pricing.

Could you set up a process (maybe the bidfax) where by he can get daily pricing info.

Thanks,

Jon
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Campbell, Scott
Sent:	Friday, June 22, 2001 1:58 PM
To:	Mckay, Jonathan
Cc:	Guerra, Jesus
Subject:	Indicative Pricing

John,
Would it be possible for you to assign one person that is easily accessible to provide Jesus with indicative pricing for Empress throughout the month?  Possibly Ryan Watt? Maybe you could include Jesus on an email distribution list (if there is such a thing) to provide him with indicatives.  We have one customer in particular that likes kicking tires, and Jesus doesn't like bothering you guys all the time for him.

T. Scott Campbell
Enron Energy Services Canada Co. Ltd.
3500 Canterra Tower
400 - 3rd Avenue S.W.
Calgary, AB T2P 4H2
ph 403-974-6789
fax 403-974-6991


First Half 2000 Accomplishments for Corporate Communications Team

Media
Major feature stories in Fortune, Forbes (cover), BusinessWeek, Financial
Times, Bloomberg Magazine, Context, Red Herring, Business 2.0, Worth, The
Standard, Wired, The Motley Fool, CBS MarketWatch, The New York Times, and
others.

Blunted potentially negative stories surrounding Orange County, Cal PX,
campaign contributions.

Initiated "new media" program with great results.  (Cover story working in
ComputerWorld)

Enron's media relations team is one of the most respected in media circles.

Advertising
Roll out of "Ask Why" campaign.

Creation of Armchair Brand Management program, to be introduced mid August.

Direction of new creative (EOL and Weather Derivatives) for campaign

Murray Gell-Man webcast

Internal Communications
Made internal communications less about newsletters and more about knowledge.

Launched e-Biz.  Two editions under our belt.  More stories, more info, once
each week versus once every two months.

Massive development of E-Speak platform. Volume has been tripling on a
monthly basis.   It is viewed, internally and externally, as the premier
internal communications medium.  Ken Lay won "Executive Communicator of the
Year" from IABC based on success of E-Speak.  Now working on popular outside
speakers, a new site called eMeeting, and other great stuff.

Hold Music!

Video in the elevators, and other jobs in support of Vision and Values
campaign.

Other
Best Annual Report We Ever Did.  (Institutional Investor thought so, too.)

MG plc Acquisition

Personnel moves in EEL and EBS.


Lisa:
Per my voice mail, here is what I sent Frank.  Stacy Dickson has confirmed
that all of the Physical answers are ok.
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000 11:33 AM -----

	Carol St Clair
	05/08/2000 06:18 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Enron-online

Frank:
I have sent your responses to Stacy Dickson and Jeff Hodge so that they can
verify the physical questions.  With respect to question #3, I would alos
state that until the Master is executed, all of those trades will be governed
by the online GTC.  Also, to the extent that Cargill traded with Enron Canada
on a financial basis, those trades would alos be confirmed under the Master
as it is my understanding taht we do not do separate Masters with the same
counterparty for ENA and ECC.

Carol


All my students are doing so well!  I'm just so proud (sniff, sniff..)!

	Peter Keohane
	08/18/2000 09:15 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Organisational Announcement

Interesting.
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 08/18/2000 08:14
AM ---------------------------

Enron Europe Office of the Chairman
08/18/2000 05:44 AM
Please respond to Enron Europe Office of the Chairman
Sent by: Enron Europe General Announcement
To: Enron Legal, Enron Executive Committee, ECT Europe, Enron VPs and MDs 1,
Enron VPs and MDs 2
cc:
Subject: Organisational Announcement

We are pleased to announce that we have appointed Michael Brown as Chief
Operating Officer of Enron Europe.

Michael joined Enron,s London legal department in 1995 and has played a key
role in the success of many of our large commercial ventures since then.  In
July 1999, he was made Enron Europe,s General Counsel.  Replacing Michael in
the General Counsel role will be Mark Evans who joined our legal department
in 1995.

Please join us in congratulating Michael and Mark in their new roles.


Please share this with your staff, and ensure everyone who needs to attend
gets signed up for a time next week.  This is my first knowledge of this -
sorry for the late notice.

George:  This is why I wanted you to call me earlier.  If you will get this
going whlie Pat's out, that would be great!  thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT on 02/10/2000
11:22 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Thomas Engel                           02/10/2000 10:56 AM

To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: SITARA DEMO - NEW RISK ASSIGNMENT

This note serves as a reminder and a request.

The new SITARA risk assignment release is scheduled for the weekend of
February 19-20.
There are 4 demos next week detailing the changes for the new risk assignment
release.
To date, we have not received sign up requests from any of the traders or
logistics personnel.
The changes in this next release are major.   It is highly recommended that
everyone who deals
with SITARA physical deals with risk assignment attend on of these demos
before implementation.

This release involves the transformation of every deal with risk assignment
to include the following new
linked hedge deal types: swaps, options, and annuities.

I cannot stress enough the significance of these changes and the
transformation of the existing deals.

Please make every effort to have your regional teams attend one of the
following demos.

DEMO TIME SLOTS:

WHEN: FEB 16TH  - 1:00 - 2:15
  FEB 16TH  - 2:30 - 3:45
  FEB 16TH  - 4:00 - 5:15
  FEB 17TH  - 3:30 - 4:45

WHERE: EB 2537

Space is limited - call the SITARA HOTLINE for time slot availability
(x3-7049).

If you have any questions you may call me (x3-1488).


that's up to you.  Stephanie and I are going.  Have not seen agenda.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:	Friday, August 10, 2001 4:19 PM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	El Paso Customer Meeting

Hey, I just got around to going through my mailbox and I did get an invitation to the customer meeting.  Do you think I need to go?


Hi Richard,

Wonder if we can get these labels finalized today?  Let me know if that is possible.

Also, wondered when you wanted to get together with Jim Keller regarding the Maine Annual Report and others due March 1st!

Thanks, Christy


I plan to send the legislative package to DOE in about 45 minutes.  Here's
the final interconnection language.  Thanks


Attached are most of the presentations given at the LNG Offisite on November
20, 2000.  I am still missing one from Brad Hitch, Dan Rogers and Javier
Chavarria.  I will send them as soon as I receive them:

Rick Bergsieker's Presentation

Doug Arnell's Presentations

Javier Marrero's Presentation

Clay Harris' Presentation

Wayne Perry's Presentation

Brent Price's Presentations

Paul Y'Barbo's Presentation - Puerto Rico LPG

Emilio Vicens Presentation - Jose LNG


----- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 10/30/2000 02:59 PM -----

	"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>
	10/30/2000 02:53 PM

		 To: <bhawkin@enron.com>, <bmerola@enron.com>, <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>,
<janelle.scheuer@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <Mary.Hain@enron.com>,
<sarah.novosel@enron.com>, <tom.hoatson@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: EPSA Motion for Cease and Desist

Attached is EPSA's emergency motion for an immediate issuance of a cease and
desist order for the Cal ISO to implement price caps, filed today.  Also
attached is EPSA's press release regarding the filing.
If you will be sending an individual letter to FERC Chairman James J. Hoecker
supporting EPSA's arguments, please be sure to file the letter in the docket
and servce the service list (approx. 200+ individuals).  If you need help
obtaining a copy of the service list, please contact Jackie Gallagher at
202-789-7200 or jgallagher@epsa.org.

Attachments

 - cal cease and desist.doc
 - Oct30calpricecaps.doc


Got your most recent message.  Your observation is correct that the Enron
Americas staff member on Shawn's team has not been involved to date with
Doorstep reviews or planning.  Although Shawn made an offer to Michelle some
time ago, there was a long lead time for her arrival.  She did not start with
the company until after Thanksgiving.  Since she started a couple of weeks
ago, Wes and I have asked her to look into several specific findings from the
most AA internal audit projects and to work with our staffs to provide some
solutions to issues that were raised.  There simply has not been the time to
date to expose her to Doorstep.

After Shawn and I meet (see below), I will briefly summarize for you the
roles that all groups will play in the Doorstep Review process.  Before we
move forward I want to be sure that all parties agree on the purpose,
methodology, participants and execution plan for this on-going project.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000 07:18 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           12/15/2000 07:18 PM

To: Shawn Kilchrist/NA/Enron
cc: Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Plans for 2001 Doorstep Reviews

I understand from Shona that you and she have discussed the plans for
Doorstep Reviews in 2001.  I am asking via this note for my assistant to set
up a meeting for the two of us to spend some time reviewing the timeline,
methodology, and the involvement of RAC, Andersen, operations and your team.
I will be on vacation the week of December 18.  I will be working the week
between Christmas and New Year's, so if you are in the office we can plan on
getting together that week.


I have updated the Tetco 7c usage tickets to include fuel.


Received: from bpmcweb.bracepatt.com (mcafee.bracepatt.com [172.16.1.17]) by
bracepatt.com; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 19:59:51 -0500
Received: FROM iss05.interliant.com BY bpmcweb.bracepatt.com ; Tue Jun 20
20:06:19 2000
X-Proxy: keymaster.bracepatt.com protected
Received: (from root@localhost) by iss05.interliant.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
TAA13042 for [OUT]dtucker@bracepatt.com; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 19:59:08 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Internet-504.interliant.com (internet-504.interliant.com
[198.64.193.30]) by iss05.interliant.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA13021
for <dtucker@bracepatt.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 19:59:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by Internet-504.interliant.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v1.2  (600.1
3-26-1998))  id 86256905.000567EA ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 19:59:02 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ILGW@JONESDAY@JDRP@OUTBOUND
From: "Boyd J. Springer" <Boyd_J._Springer@jonesday.com>
To: dtucker@bracepatt.com
Message-ID: <86256905.000565C0.00@Internet-504.interliant.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 19:48:43 -0500
Subject: Illinois agency
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

I have confirmed that, under Illinois law, an action must be in the name of
the actual party in interest, and cannot be in the name of an agent. If
properly authorized, an agent can bring an action in the principal's name.
Also, if valid assignment or subrogation of a claim occurs, any action must
be brought in the name of the assignee or subrogee.


I will be passing an envelop to collect a small monetary token of
appreciation for Kimberly and Alex for Administrative Assistants' week.
Please give if you are able and in an amount that you
feel is appropriate.
thanks,

Scott Neal


Winter 98-99,not 97-98.
---------------------- Forwarded by Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT on 12/03/99 10:17
AM ---------------------------

Janet H Wallis
12/02/99 11:43 AM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregory L
Sharp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENTEX AUDIT

Dan, please be aware that the Texas Desk would like to Audit Entex beginning
4/1/99 for a one year term.   The actuals for 3/30/00 should be in no later
then May 1, 00.  Tom  Martin would also like to Audit the Winter 97-98.

What is the first step? Do we need to notify them in writing? Please advise.

Thanks,

Janet


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
05:25 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@btu.net> on 12/01/2000 05:18:52 PM
To: "Btu Weekly" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu Weekly

Attached is the latest issue of Btu Weekly.

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wg120400.pdf


Hi Kate, Stephanie Checkout with Prebon because I was out last week and I am
still trying to clear up some deals from the 14th.   The west checkout person
at Prebon is on vacation and his back-up is just now getting back with me on
these discrepancies.

Matt Motley
deal 550383
Prebon says cp should be Neveda Power.,..........we have Sierra Pacific

Matt Motley
deal 550385
Prebon says cp should be Neveda Power.......we have Sierra Pacific

Sean Crandall
deal 550480
Prebon says cp should be Merrill Lynch......we have Morgan Stanley


Tana:

As we discussed, perhaps Bob should have a brief conversation with the
counterparty to confirm that an NDA is appropriate.  If the counterparty's
only concern is that they do not want to be obligated to disclose
confidential information in the course of any discussions with us, we are
happy to include the following provision in our NDA to make clear that it is
under no obligation to provide us with confidential information:

"Whether to disclose particular information remains the sole discretion of
the disclosing party and nothing hereunder obligates a party in any way to
disclose any information."

Leslie

	Tana Jones
	12/08/2000 08:56 AM

		 To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: NDA-PVM Oil Associates Limited

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000 08:55 AM -----

	David Hufton <dhufton@pvm.co.uk>
	12/08/2000 04:19 AM

		 To: Tana.Jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: NDA-PVM Oil Associates Limited

Thank you for the NDA . I would like to clarify that as we do not know what
Enron have in mind we cannot at this stage commit to furnish  information
which may be implied in the first sentence of the document . More
appropriate wording  may be  "in the event of the provision of information
" At 18:26 06/12/00 -0600, you wrote:
>At the request of Bob Shults, I am enclosing a copy of our proposed form of
>Non-Disclosure Agreement.  If you have any comments or questions, please do
>not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3399, or email me your comments.
>
>(See attached file: PVM Oil.doc)
>
>

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager. Unless stated to the contrary, any opinions
in this message are personal and may not be attributed to
PVM Oil Associates, Ltd.
**********************************************************************


As you know the ENA OTC is actively working with the Analyst and Associate
Program to develop greater talent flow into ENA.  We are presently working on
a number of initiatives to improve how this is working and significantly
improve communication flow and responsiveness. However in this regard we also
need you to help make sure we have clear lines of communication within ENA
regarding A&A resource levels, performance, rotations and retention efforts.

In this regard we would like for each of you to take the lead  for your
groups needs and ensure that any requests, questions or concerns about A&A's
in your area are passed through you to either Ted Bland (ENA Recuitment Team
Lead - x35275) or Jana Giovannani (ENA liaison from the AA Program - x39233)
or myself. It is important that we are discerning about what we do with our
A&A resources and plan carefully and accurately for our future needs, in this
regard we need for you personally (or a senior member of your team who you
may optionally delegate this task to) will take the time to review any A&A
resource requests from your team before passing them onto us.

In addition, given the importance of these resources, we will be inviting you
to a regular bi-monthly meeting to discuss ENA A&A matters. We will confirm
the first date in due course. In the meantime if you would like to volunteer
another senior member of your team to assume this reponsibility please supply
their name as soon as possible.

Please call with any questions.


The eThink Team

Do you know what's included in Enron's Code of Ethics?  Do you know what
policies affect corporate conduct?  Ask Sharon Butcher, Assistant General
Counsel of Corporate Legal, all your questions about our corporate policies
today (June 5) on eSpeak at 10 a.m. Houston time.
Can't make the live event?  No worries.  Go to eSpeak (
http://ethink.enron.com/eSpeak/exec/default.asp) now and submit your
question.  Sharon will try to answer it during her event and you can read the
transcript later.

Stop what you're doing!  Go to the Thinkbank (
http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/Thinkbank.nsf/HomePage?OpenPage)
now!  Notice anything different?


Jim:

Here is a term sheet for gas supply.  Prices are up quite a bit today.  The fixed price is about $3.30/MMBtu.  Recognize that it is very volatile right now, however, and prices could be back down tomorrow.

I am still working with EES to se if they want to submit an offer.

C


Steve -

As you requested, attached please find the Analyst compensation comparables
we discussed last week:

We are having an extremely tough time recruiting Analysts from Rice because
our main competition on campus comes from consulting companies (Bain,
McKinsey, BCG, EY, Andersen, etc.) and investment banks (Goldman, JP Morgan,
CSFB, Merrill Lynch, etc.).  Even though these companies are not directly in
our industry group, they are our principal competitors for talent at Rice.

As evidenced by our recruiting performance this year and in previous years,
we loose nearly every time when we compete with these companies.    In the
last three years of recruiting at Rice, only 1 or 2 people have accepted our
offer.  The other Analysts who are rice alumni (myself included) joined Enron
through other circumstances.

I think our poor performance at Rice is due primarily to the following
factors:

Compensation:  The Enron compensation package  is below that of our
competitors at Rice.  Additionally, there is more risk associated with our
offer, since Enron's compensation structure relies more heavily on the year
end bonus than some of our competitors.  In the cases where the package is
similar (ie, McKinsey), we loose folks because of other company's name and
prestige.
Rotations:  Most investment banks give their analysts offers to work in
specific groups (M&A, Trading, Etc.).  Our analyst recruits can express a
preference, but their placement is not guaranteed.    This also creates an
added element of risk and uncertainty.

In sum, I think we will continue to be unsuccessful in our recruiting efforts
at Rice if we do not address these issues.

Should you need any further information, please feel free to contact me.

Regards,

Alex Hernandez
ENA - Principal Investments
713-345-4059

---------------------- Forwarded by Alejandro Hernandez/NA/Enron on
12/15/2000 03:31 PM ---------------------------

Alejandro Hernandez
12/15/2000 03:30 PM
To: Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julie Braly/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jana
Giovannini/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelly Butler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, David
Hunker/ENRON@enronxgate, Priya Jaisinghani/NA/Enron@Enron, Carrie
Southard/LON/ECT@ECT, Erin A Rice/LON/ECT@ECT, Julie Davidson/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Analyst Compensation Comparables

Charlene -

As we discussed yesterday, attached please find a comparable compensation
analysis for this year's Analyst offers:

We believe that the low acceptance rate ( 14/112 ) we are experiencing this
year is due to the following reasons:

Enron's base salary is significantly below that of our competitors
The bonus ranges were not mentioned in the offer letters

I hope this information is useful to you as we continue our efforts to
attract quality employees to Enron.

Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Regards,

Alex Hernandez
Analyst Advisory Board
x54059


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042821.txt


Dear John,

Jonathan and I met with IBJ today to try and push our negotiations through to
the end.  They are still unwilling to do a CSA with us but very significantly
their back / mid office is currently looking at getting systems support in
place which would permit them to do a CSA with us in due course.  They
acknowledged to us of their own volition that the market trend is towards
CSAs even in transactions where the counter party is not a bank.  They did
say though that it would be a few months before they would be set up to do
so. Pls note that they did not agree to do a CSA with us as soon as they are
set up to do so but they now know we will come knocking at some stage to ask
them to do it so I think we have gone as far as we can on this for now.

We will therefore move forward on the credit matrix in the meantime, if you
are still willing to do so.  The bank has a credit rating of A, so I guess
this means US$15 million credit limit.

On the assumption that it is possible to draft these terms into a contract
without a full CSA, I wonder who is best to do this drafting.  I should be
able to do the negotiations but I am not sure that I am able to do the
drafting .... Alan, do you have any suggestions?

Most of the other issues are sorted now but they still want to change the
"Threshold Amount" definition to US$10 million.  Is there any flexibility on
this?

Thanks.

Jane McBride

	John Suttle@ECT
	09/27/2000 12:39 AM

		 To: Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morten E
Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Steven Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

Jonathan,

One thing we might be able to propose is a "Credit Matrix" which prescribes a
Credit Line under which each counterparty can transact - with collateral
rights and collateral thresholds tied to the credit rating of each
counterparty.  We have used credit matrixes in several contracts here and
they are appealing in that there are no Material Adverse Change (MAC)
clauses.  This is appealing to the counterparty in that we cannot
automatically drop their collateral threshold to zero when a MAC occurs.  We
are comfortable because as the counterparty's credit quality deteriorates,
the amount of exposure to which we are subject decreases.  I would propose to
IBJ something like the following in lieu of a full CSA.  Jane and John - is
it possible to draft these collateral/credit terms into the contract without
using a full CSA?  (I think every matrix I have used here has been part of a
CSA).

Rating (S&P)     Credit Line
AA or above    $20MM
BBB+ to AA-    $15MM
BBB     $10MM
BBB-     $7MM
BB- to BB+    $5MM
Below BB-    $1MM

These terms are subject to negotiation.  Once again, the matrix removes MAC
clauses and the stress counterparties associate with such, but effectively
reduces the potential exposure we have (or THEY have) to a counterparty with
diminishing credit quality.

What do you all think?

John

Jonathan Whitehead @ ENRON   09/25/2000 08:18 PM

To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morten E
Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Steven Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

Sorry, Pressed send too early:

John, Have had a conversation with IBJ re the CSA, and they have asked us to
consider proposing a solution that does not involve a CSA. I propose to meet
with them again to try and explore why, but I would like to be prepared to
offer them a solution whereby we don't enter into a CSA, and we would limit
the types of trades that we could enter into with IBJ. My feeling is that we
would be unlikely to enter into any long term transactions (over 2 years) at
this stage anyway, and would prefer to get the relationship going, as I am
not sure they are going to budge on this issue yet. They appear to be quite
willing to discuss all the other points. We can always press for a
renegotiation at a later stage if we do want to enter into longer term deals.
I also want to keep the loan facility completely separate.

What are your thoughts on this, and what limitations would you want to put on
trades if we do not have a CSA?

Thanks,
Jonathan

	John Viverito
	09/22/2000 12:04 PM

		 To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron@ECT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT,
Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com, Kevin Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morten E Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron@ECT, Steven
Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

John-

During our last meeting with IBJ, we pushed hard for the implementation of
the CSA.  I believe that they have the systems capability to handle the
requisite activities relating to the CSA, as we understand that they utilize
same with certain financial institution counterparties.  We expressed our
view on these matters and also raised other issues that we had discussed in
our recent conference call.

IBJ informed us that they have never entered into a CSA with a non-financial
institution counterparty and my response was that Enron can then be the
first.  We requested that they raise this issue with their respective
superiors.  As you know, their response to our discussions relating to this
issue was "In terms of CSA, as we are not ready for running collateral
operations, we still do not prefer to use the CSA."  The legitimacy of this
statement is certainly debatable and the underlying reason may actually be
something entirely different, including the possibility that they merely do
not want to enter into a CSA with a non-financial institution.

We will continue to attempt to persuade IBJ to enter into the CSA with Enron,
however it is uncertain if this is achievable.


FYI--Appears others will also be supporting the Proposed Decision.  No word yet on SoCal's position.  gh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:16 AM
To:	Hass, Glen
Subject:	RE: Bilas , Proposed Decision SoCal GIR

FYI.  Latest info is that large customers, some QF cogens, independent storage companies, and perhaps PG&E, will be filing separate comments supporting the Bilas decision to adopt the settlement.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hass, Glen
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:36 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Donoho, Lindy; Dasovich, Jeff; Pryor, Tony; Lichtenwalter, Blair; Lokey, Teb
Cc:	Harris, Steven; Kilmer III, Robert; Miller, Mary Kay
Subject:	FW: Bilas , Proposed Decision SoCal GIR

As requested, Mark Baldwin has put together a summary of the Proposed Decision and Comment Points for filing on Friday.  Below are his comments which we can use for discussion purposes at the conference call later this morning.  Having reviewed the Proposed Decision I would agree with Mark's assessment in that while we may prefer that the Commission not modify the Comprehensive Settlement, overall the modifications made should not negatively impact Transwestern.  The Proposed Decision retains two important aspects of the CS for Transwestern:  1)  Unbundling of the SoCal backbone transmission system and receipt point capacity and 2) Retention of primary firm RP capacity of 750MM/d at Needles from Transwestern.  gh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	<mbaldwin@igservice.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 5:50 PM
To:	Hass, Glen
Subject:	Bilas , Proposed Decision SoCal GIR

Glen,

I have reviewed the 10/10/01 Revised PD of Comr. Bilas as requested. In view
of the entirety of TW's interest ,I still ascertain that TW can support the
current 10/10 PD. Noted below for your information and review is a summary
of the Modifications to the CSA that Bilas is currently offering :

1)Market concentration limits reduced from 40% to 30 % of available receipt
point capacity. TW has preferred no limits to market concentration
historically. However, as before, I do not believe pushing this issue will
be successful or productive for TW. There are no market concentration limits
in the secondary market. (Although Bilas warns market participants that any
misbehavior will be subject to CPUC investigation) P.44

2)SoCal will be required to make available on a daily basis any unutilized
firm RP capacity. I don't see any negative impact on TW, perhaps positive.
P.45

3)Price Cap for secondary intrastate market set at 120 % of SoCal firm rate.
This is the same cap that applies to SoCal. I don't like the precedent set
in this area, however it assures that the economic value allocation between
SoCal citygate and supply basin will proportionately tend toward the
interstate system providers in any tight transport/supply scenario. P.46

4)Not really a change , but Bilas mentions support for Hector Rd. as a
delivery/receipt at Ferc.

5)PD does not reduce the core's interstate capacity nor their storage
capacities but rather maintains these capacities at current levels. Current
level 1044 MMcfd, proposed 1000 MMcfd on the interstate system and current
storage 70 BCF, 327 MMcfd of injection and 1,935 MMcfd withdrawal Vs
proposed 55 BCF.  I see no clear negative impact on TW from this change.P.
52 &54.

6) CTA's (Core Transport Agents) allowed to reject only their prorata share
of non-reliability storage service. No impact on TW interests. P. 58

7) SoCal directed to present(via Advice Ltr.) how the cost of noncore
default balancing will be allocated ONLY to those noncore customer using
this service and not to the Core customers. I see no impact on TW. P.62

8)PD rejects the requirement that SoCal/SDG&E file an application with a
proposal to address core procurement function as the default provider.  I
see only positive attributes of this change for TW. P.63

9)Preserves the right for SoCal/SDG&E to seek recovery of expenditures
associated with the transfers of customers from Core to Core Aggregator. NO
impact on TW. P.66

10)PD orders a 10 % cap on ITCS (stranded cost)responsibility borne by
bundled core customers due to unbundled core interstate capacity. No direct
impact upon TW interest, however, likely a touchy point with noncore
interest. P. 75

11) PD orders that the core contribution to noncore ITCS will end effective
the adoption of the PD. Additionally, noncore customers to pay 50% of core
ITCS till the end of the core TW and EPNG agreements. No negative impact on
TW. Noncore customers bear additional expense. The PD estimates an
additional $18 million over next 5 to 6 years. P. 78 The PD provides an
estimate of increased stranded cost for the noncore between 01 and 06 to be
approx. $ 44.4 Million.

12) PD say NO to an increase in the core brokerage fee of $ 0.0039 (to $2.4
cents). No impact on TW interest. P.83.

13) PD treats Core Subscription service differently on an accounting basis.
No impact on TW. P.85-87

14)Generally, the PD makes some administrative changes to the small core/ESP
market rules and SoCal services and consumer protection implementation . NO
impact on TW interest. P 88-100.

15)Lots of tweaking on how SoCal can recover the cost to implement to
services envisioned under the CSA. Owing to the fact that SoCal has already
started to "implement" portions of the CSA and those cost are accruing to a
balancing account etc. Bottomline, not consequential to the approval of the
PD. No direct impact upon TW interest. P. 103-110.

On whole the centerpiece of TW's interest in this proceeding remains intact.
The SoCal receipt points are unbundled along with "SoCal backbone
facilities". TW has primary firm RP of no less than 750 mmfcd. Mojave is
recognized at only 50 mmfcd firm RP. No receipt point complex is given a
preference for capacity expansion. Line 235 appears to remain useful for TW
deliveries into the market load centers. The PD modifications to the CSA do
not impose upon TW any conditions or costs that would be reason not to
support the PD. The parties most affected by the PD are the core aggregators
with additional costs and restrictions to service options and noncore
customers with additional cost allocations.

Points for comments

1) TW agrees with the PD that the centerpiece of positive changes embodied
in the CSA in the creation of firm tradable RP rights. This change in SoCal
market structure provides all market participants with the proper tools to
build long term supply and transportation contracts.

2) Further adoption of the PD substantially reduces unnecessary market
inefficiencies at the California border by providing all market participants
with gas scheduling certainty.

3) The creation of tradable secondary rights on SoCal's intrastate system
will promote competition and generally lead to stable delivered gas prices.

4) The PD correctly observes that the PG&E market structure which relieves
upon an unbundled intrastate backbone system work "relatively well" during
California's challenging energy markets.

5)TW agrees that the time is ripe for approval of the PD. The energy markets
in California have been improving and stabilizing. The Commission promising
options are still valid in today's gas market. Further, SoCal is already
starting to follow the CSA game plan in their attempts to improve the
operating environment on the SoCal system. It is consistent to follow
through and make the structural changes required to make permanent these
improvements.

6)TW supports SoCal and others whom are approving this PD. (ON THIS POINT,
TW SHOULD BE SURE THAT SOCAL IS ON BOARD AS WELL AS OTHER CSA SIGNATORIES,
PRIOR TO FILING THESE TYPE COMMENTS)

I look forward to discussing these matters tomorrow on the conference call.

Mark, IGS.

Mark, IGS.


Prentice tell you we're coming up tonite?  Little spades is in order me
thinks.  You?


---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/HOU/EES on 09/28/2000 09:22
AM ---------------------------

Kim Chick
09/28/2000 09:13 AM
To: Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES, Emily Allwardt/LON/ECT@ECT, Angie
Ramirez/HOU/EES@EES, jenn_stew@hotmail.com
cc:
Subject: FW: TeasingCat.MPG 2.mpeg

 - TeasingCat.MPG 2.mpeg


enjoy

Marcus B. Jones
MCA Architects, P.C.
PH (503)226-0622
FAX (503)226-0626
30 NW 1st Ave.
Portland, OR 97209

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Gates
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 9:08 AM
To: Marcus Jones
Subject: FW: Mortician's Tale (Tail?)

-----Original Message-----
From: NOBLE Bob P [mailto:Bob.P.NOBLE@ci.eugene.or.us]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 8:58 AM
To: Dan Gates
Subject: FW: Mortician's Tale (Tail?)

The Mortician's Tale

A Portland area mortician had a new apprentice who was learning the
embalming ropes.  He walked into the embalming room where a cadaver was
lying on the table. Thinking he knew enough now to begin the procedure
without his boss, he began examining the body.  He rolled it over and to his

amazement, there was a cork in its rear end.  Mystified, he pulled it out,
and immediately heard the University of Oregon fight song come out the
cadaver's butt.

Startled by what had happened, he shoved the cork back into the cadaver and
ran up the stairs to find his mentor.  "Sir, you've got to come down and
help me! I've just seen something I can't believe", he cried.  Annoyed by
the naivet, of his assistant, he followed him downstairs.  "There! Look at
the cork in the ass of that body", said the assistant.  "I couldn't imagine
what it was doing there so I pulled it out.  Please, you do it."  The
mortician was a bit surprised to see the cork too, so he walked to the table

and removed the cork.  Once again, the University of Oregon fight song
started playing.  Exasperated, he replaced the cork in its appointed
position, turned to his assistant and said:  "What's so surprising about
that? I've heard thousands of assholes sing that song."

Obviously A Beaver Believer


Hi John,

Enron is ok with signing the consents.  After the assignment of the contracts
out of LLCs, we would like to exercise our put.  Please share this info with
George.

I believe Ben will be in town tomorrow (right Ben?) so we can get it signed
up this week.

Thanks,

Kay


i think i might be going to this gas conference on aug 7th.  that is a
monday.  if that is the case, i will try to fly into town either fri night or
saturday so i can have more time there.  i will let you know more monday.


Message Description: Interday 1 Deadline Extension

Message Date:	12/28/2001

Message Text:

ID1 Deadline Extension

PG&E has extended the ID1 deadline to 08:30 AM for gas day 12/28/2001.

Please call the Scheduling Hotline (415) 973-2424, or toll free, 800- 343-4743, if you have any questions.

Gas Schedulers
PG&E - California Gas Transmission


Jeff, Give me a buzz if you can ... Alan 503-464-8129


FYI

Vince

P.S. Charlene, I am in London till Wednesday. If you have any questions you
can contact Stinson Gibner
X3-4748.
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2000
09:49 PM ---------------------------

Stinson Gibner
02/18/2000 01:58 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Resume and Available dates for Amy Ward

Vince:   Here is an electronic version of Amy Ward's resume.

--Stinson

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 02/18/2000
01:58 PM ---------------------------

Amy Ruth Ward <award@Stanford.EDU> on 02/18/2000 12:02:22 PM
To: Stinson Gibner <Stinson.Gibner@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Thanks for coming to Houston

Stinson,

I am pleased to hear your HR department is putting together an offer for
summer employment.  I enjoyed everyone I interviewed with while in Houston
and appreciated you taking the time to put together this day.

As requested, I am attaching an electronic version of my resume.  (Note it
is a slightly more updated one then the one I gave you earlier.)  It is in
Microsoft Word format.

My dates of availability are Wed., July 5 through Fri., September 15 (10
1/2 weeks).

Sincerely,
Amy Ward

 - resume.doc


i am going to the strip club.  do you want to meet me there?  i will get you a lap dance.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:38 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

 you'll be fine

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:34 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

i resent that too

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:30 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   why? it's true.  i resent the fact that you can't be honest with me

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:29 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   i resent that last comment

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:25 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      exactly, see, worthless.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:22 PM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      i am gonna buy you a bmw

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:19 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         whatever, from now on i just won't listen to anything you say.   i
      will
         consider everything that comes out of your mouth worthless.

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:07 PM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         it is so easy b/c you get all worked up and you are not sure
   whether
      to
         believe me or not.

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
            Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:55 PM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            you love trying to get on my nerves don't you?

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
            Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:50 PM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject: RE:

            you have such a temper.

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
               Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:46 PM
               To:     Lenhart, Matthew
               Subject:  RE:

               matt, it's cool.  i was just playing!

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
      [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
               Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:40 PM
               To: erichardson@sarofim.com
               Subject: RE:

               just chill girl.

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
                  Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:34 PM
                  To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                  Subject:  RE:

                  i'm not getting worked up, i was just typing a playful,
            meaningless
                  email.
                  stop trying to pick a fight with me.

                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
         [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                  Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:29 PM
                  To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                  Subject: RE:

                  it isn't that big of a deal.  why don't you just relax
   about
         the
               whole
                  thing.

                      -----Original Message-----
                     From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
   @ENRON
                     Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:24 PM
                     To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                     Subject:  RE:

                     no, i'm not.  by the way, i broke down and told jenn
      about
         the
               whole
                     bonnie
                     thing.  she doesn't think i look like her either so
   now i
      am
               feeling
                     much
                     better no thanks to you.

                     -----Original Message-----
                     From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
            [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                     Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:56 PM
                     To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                     Subject: RE:

                     no.  you are so gullable.

                         -----Original Message-----
                        From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
      @ENRON
                        Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:39 PM
                        To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                        Subject:  RE:

                        so, are you really "hitting the strip clubs"
   tonight?

                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
               [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                        Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:38 PM
                        To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                        Subject: RE:

                        ok

                            -----Original Message-----
                           From:   Erin Richardson
   <erichardson@sarofim.com>
         @ENRON
                           Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:36 PM
                           To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                           Subject:  RE:

                           ok, enough.  this isn't funny anymore.

                           -----Original Message-----
                           From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                  [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                           Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:32 PM
                           To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                           Subject: RE:

                           yeah.  i think we are hitting the strip clubs.

                               -----Original Message-----
                              From:   Erin Richardson
      <erichardson@sarofim.com>
            @ENRON
                              Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:23 PM
                              To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                              Subject:  RE:

                              of course i am.  i am going out straight from
      work.
            you?

                              -----Original Message-----
                              From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                     [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                              Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:35 PM
                              To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                              Subject: RE:

                              i am ready to go tonight.  you going out?

                                  -----Original Message-----
                                 From:   Erin Richardson
         <erichardson@sarofim.com>
               @ENRON
                                 Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:30
   PM
                                 To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                 Subject:  RE:

                                 shut up, stop lying.  i don't believe you
   at
         all.

                                 -----Original Message-----
                                 From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                        [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                 Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:29 PM
                                 To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                 Subject: RE:

                                 where didn't i go?

                                     -----Original Message-----
                                    From:   Erin Richardson
            <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                  @ENRON
                                    Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001
   12:24
      PM
                                    To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                    Subject:  RE:

                                    where did you go?

                                    -----Original Message-----
                                    From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                           [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                    Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:25
   PM
                                    To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                    Subject: RE:

                                    no really.  it was a blast.  little
   tired
      but
         i
            can
                  rally
                        for
                                 tonight.

                                        -----Original Message-----
                                       From:   Erin Richardson
               <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                     @ENRON
                                       Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001
      12:21
         PM
                                       To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                       Subject:  RE:

                                       liar

                                       -----Original Message-----
                                       From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                              [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                       Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001
   12:22
      PM
                                       To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                       Subject: RE:

                                       i didn't even go home

                                           -----Original Message-----
                                          From:   Erin Richardson
                  <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                        @ENRON
                                          Sent:   Thursday, October 11,
   2001
         12:19
            PM
                                          To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                          Subject:  RE:

                                          great, you don't stand a chance.
   i
         didn't
               get
                  home
                        until
                              5:30
                                    this
                                          morning
                                          and i think i was still drunk
   when i
         got
            to
                  work.
                     how
                           about
                                 you?

                                          -----Original Message-----
                                          From: Lenhart, Matthew
                        [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
                                          Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001
      11:58
         AM
                                          To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                          Subject:

                                          how are we doing on our contest?

   **********************************************************************
                                          This e-mail is the property of
   Enron
         Corp.
                  and/or
                     its
                              relevant
                                       affiliate
                                          and
                                          may contain confidential and
      privileged
               material
                     for
                        the
                              sole
                                 use
                                    of
                                       the
                                          intended recipient (s). Any
   review,
         use,
                     distribution
                        or
                                    disclosure
                                       by
                                          others is strictly prohibited. If
      you
         are
            not
                  the
                           intended
                                    recipient
                                       (or
                                          authorized to receive for the
         recipient),
               please
                        contact
                           the
                                    sender
                                       or
                                          reply
                                          to Enron Corp. at
                           enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
                              and
                                    delete
                                          all
                                          copies of the message. This
   e-mail
      (and
            any
                        attachments
                              hereto)
                                    are
                                       not
                                          intended to be an offer (or an
         acceptance)
               and
                  do
                     not
                           create
                              or
                                       evidence
                                          a
                                          binding and enforceable contract
         between
               Enron
                     Corp.
                        (or
                           any
                              of
                                    its
                                          affiliates) and the intended
      recipient
         or
            any
                  other
                           party,
                              and
                                 may
                                       not
                                          be
                                          relied on by anyone as the basis
   of
      a
               contract
                  by
                           estoppel
                              or
                                       otherwise.
                                          Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2001 12:16 PM -----

	James E Keller@EES
	05/27/2001 07:44 PM

		 To: Deborah Culver/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EWS/EES

Attached are the current plan & deal status.

 Jim


your mom didn't say she was ugly.  stop lying.  i think that girl is hot so i don't care.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:29 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:

well, i asked my mom if she thinks i look like that bonnie girl and she
thinks you are insane and that i should never talk to you again for
insulting me so badly.  i told you that girl was ugly.


One minor point:  the response to the first data request implies that all
employees went through the PRC process in 2000.  I am not sure this is
accurate.  It's fair to say that most did, but I believe that the field
employees who are organized into self-directed work teams do not go through
the PRC process.


Here is the CA from Kinder Morgan that we sent out for the Peakers.  I did
not send out any other CA's.  There is one very minor change that they sent
me.  I will bring it up to you.
Ben


This WORKS for me.  Thanks! I can be there.

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Govenar [mailto:sgovenar@govadv.com]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:14 PM
To: Hedy Govenar; Bev Hansen; Steffes, James D.; Susan J Mara; Jeff
Dasovich; Kaufman, Paul
Subject: Latino Caucus

The Latino caucus has moved the date of the dinner from September 4,
which
did not work for Enron, to September 10 at approximately 7:30 p.m.
Please
let me know if this works for everyone.

Thank you.


Attached, in Word Perfect format, are the closing documents for the
Hawaii I transaction. Each of the documents has been marked to show
changes from the prior version, with the following exceptions (i) most
of the documents related to the Danno B rollover are marked against the
original Danno B documents and (ii) the Series Danno B Certificate is
marked against the replacement certificate for Series McGarret A.

The documents are identified as follows:

Closing Checklist (266235)

Trust Agreement (266236)

Beneficial Interest Certificate (266242)

Distribution Agreement (266243)

Subscription Documents (266245)

Ex. H, to Facility Agmt (Transfer and Auction) (266256)

Ex. I, Part A to Facility Agmt (Asset LLC Agmt) (266270)

Ex. I, Part B to Facility Agmt (Transferor LLC Agmt) (266276)

Omnibus Amendment (Danno B) (267271)

Series Certificate (267069)

Series Supplement (267237)

Drawdown Request (267252)

Put Assignment (267264)

Notice of Put Asgnmt (267266)

B Interest Asgnmt (267267)

Receipt of Transferor (267313)

Receipt of Trust (267321)

Transfer and Auction Agmt (267322)

Direction Ltr to Owner Trustee of Hawaii Trust (267371)

Notice of Prepayment (267365)

Receipt of Agent (267366)

Direction Ltr to Owner Trustee of Hawaii I Trust (267358)

 - 266235.wpd
 - 266236.wpd
 - 266242.wpd
 - 266243.wpd
 - 266245.wpd
 - 266256.wpd
 - 266270.wpd
 - 266276.wpd
 - 267069.wpd
 - 267237.wpd
 - 267252.wpd
 - 267264.wpd
 - 267266.wpd
 - 267267.wpd
 - 267271.wpd
 - 267313.wpd
 - 267321.wpd
 - 267322.wpd
 - 267358.wpd
 - 267365.wpd
 - 267365.wpd
 - 267366.wpd
 - 267371.wpd
 - 268701.wpd


Group,

We need to re-market  3 MW  of Louisiana Pacific starting HE 1100 PPT Feb 23
and all day Sat Feb 24.    These deals should be made under LT-NW (ALL
DEALS).  We will be long PGE purchase at Colstrip and can route the deals to
this PGE deal.  These deals should go in the services sheet using Holden's
formulas.  You may want to bundle the 3 mws (maybe with Willamette or MPC) to
beat a price of $170.  Please send me an email with the deal numbers and the
sale prices and I will make the annuity to make sure that we get paid.

Thank you for your help.

Bill


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 12/13/2000
05:19 PM ---------------------------

Susan J Mara
12/13/2000 05:15 PM
To: Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chris H
Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, rcarroll@bracepatt.com
cc:

Subject: Follow-up to Governor's Press Conference

----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 12/13/2000 03:14 PM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	12/13/2000 02:57 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Tom Ross" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>,
"Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Stephanie-Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Rob Lamkin"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Pigott
Jack" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Paula Hall-Collins"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "Norton Kelli"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "McNally Ray" <rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>,
"Marty Wilson" <mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>,
"Kristin Vellandi" <kvellandi@pstrategies.com>, "kent Palmerton"
<kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Karen
Edson" <kedson@ns.net>, "John Stout" <John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe
Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Jeff Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jean
Munoz" <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>,
"Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Curtis Kebler"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Bob Weisenmiller" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>,
"Baker Carolyn" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "B Brown Andy"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "Andy Brown" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "Douglas Kerner"
<DKK@eslawfirm.com>, "Dave Modisette" <dmodis@ns.net>
		 cc: "Cary Rudman" <cjrudman@softcom.net>, "Hedy Govenar"
<hgovenar@acom2.com>, "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Bev Hansen"
<bhansen@lhom.com>
		 Subject: Follow-up to Governor's Press Conference

The following is the list of suppliers referenced by Governor Davis in today
's Washington, DC press conference.  For those of you that are IEP members,
it would be helpful if you forwarded to IEP any comments you have made or
plan on making to the press.

These suppliers have advised the ISO that they are unwilling to sell power
into the California markets.

Dynegy Power Marketing
Trans Alta
Eugene Water and Electric
Southern Energy Trading
PowerEx (BC Hydro)
Public Service Colorado
Enron Power Marketing
Portland General
Avista (Washington Water Power)
Idaho Power Company
PPL Montana
Seattle City Light
Puget Sound Energy

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Edson + Modisette
jmball@ns.net


here is the the file.
PL


This is just from GS, the market data is not out yet

-----Original Message-----
From: Carter, Karen E.
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:22 AM
To: Causholli, Monika
Cc: Allan, David
Subject: RE: Pulp Update: Inventory Rise in July Well Below Average;
Goldman Sachs High Yield Research; 8/14/01

Monika,

Is this proprietary data from Goldman or is it data which is already available in the market, i.e. via CEPI? Thanks.

KC

-----Original Message-----
From: Causholli, Monika
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Aguilera-Peon, Maria Teresa; Allan, David; Biggerstaff, Finley;
Boudreaux, Jay; Bruch, Greg; Bryja, James; Carter, Karen E.; Conner,
Andrew R.; Crane, Bob; Dimitry, Dirk; Rickard, Craig; Robinson, Richard
T.; Stapley, Cecil
Subject: FW: Pulp Update: Inventory Rise in July Well Below Average;
Goldman Sachs High Yield Research; 8/14/01

-----Original Message-----
From: Velez, Luis
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: FW: Pulp Update: Inventory Rise in July Well Below Average;
Goldman Sachs High Yield Research; 8/14/01

-----Original Message-----
From: Stivaletti, Joe [mailto:joe.stivaletti@gs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Stivaletti, Joe
Subject: Pulp Update: Inventory Rise in July Well Below Average; Goldman
Sachs High Yield Research; 8/14/01

Pulp Update: Inventory Rise in July Well Below Average; Goldman Sachs High
Yield Research; 8/14/01

Norscan pulp inventories rose just 4,000 tonnes in July, which is well below
the typical seasonal increase of approximately 150,000 tonnes.  Amidst all
the bad news about the pulp environment, this is good news.  Producer
downtime is certainly helping.  However, pulp prices remain quite weak, and
inventories of 1.78 million tonnes are still too high to allow for any
tightening of supply and demand in the short term.

We will distribute details of the July pulp report once they are available.

Joe Stivaletti
Goldman, Sachs, & Co.
High Yield Research
85 Broad Street, 29th floor
New York, NY 10004
(212) 902-3299


Is this something you are working on?
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 09:55 AM -----

	Julia H Chin@ENRON
	09/11/2000 08:16 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Osprey II - Enron Agreement

hi mark -- this is a currency swap agreement for the pending condor follow-on
offering.  could you have some one from your group take a look of this
agreement?  we are printing the preliminary offering memo this friday and the
deal closes toward the end of this month.

thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Julia H Chin/NA/Enron on 09/11/2000 08:09
AM ---------------------------

JGallup@milbank.com on 09/09/2000 01:21:13 AM
To: barry.schnapper@enron.com, dan.boyle@enron.com,
trevor.randolph@enron.com, brian.steinbrueck@enron.com,
julia.h.chin@enron.com, gina.karathanos@enron.com, annmarie.tiller@enron.com,
Brent.Vasconcellos@enron.com, clint.walden@enron.com, ryan.siurek@enron.com,
lnath@dlj.com, dscott@dlj.com, dcapolon@dlj.com, lmallett@dlj.com,
mbdavis@dlj.com, dhemsey@dlj.com, cwebb@dlj.com, mprotz@dlj.com,
mcho@dlj.com, paul.f.cambridge@db.com, mike.jakubik@db.com,
craig.orchant@db.com, george.tyson@db.com, ross.newman@db.com,
maia.babbs@db.com, ute.muenstermann@db.com, peter.zabel@db.com,
joseph.kopec@db.com, mspradling@velaw.com, rastin@velaw.com,
eosterberg@velaw.com, tchandler@velaw.com, crankin@velaw.com,
pwarman@velaw.com, silversteina@sewkis.com, sbaratta@sewkis.com,
aroberts@wilmingtontrust.com, jlawler@wilmingtontrust.com,
gmitchell@ustrust.com, lyoung@ustrust.com, mazie@rlf.com,
tom.mazza@deweyballantine.com, joan.wheatley@deweyballantine.com,
hershel.wein@deweyballantine.com, robert.frastai@deweyballantine.com
cc: TDavis@milbank.com, BKayle@milbank.com, JGallup@milbank.com,
AWalker@milbank.com, ELim@milbank.com, SRenas@milbank.com,
KRiester@milbank.com

Subject: Osprey II - Enron Agreement

Attached, please find a draft of the Enron Agreement for the Osprey II
transaction.? Please be advised that this draft is simultaneously being
distributed to our clients and therefore, remains subject to their review and
comments.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or comments.

Best regards,

Joy K. Gallup

 <<Enron Agreement.doc>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - Enron Agreement.doc


Dear U2 Fan,

As previously promised,  U2.com visitors can listen to clips from two more
songs from the new album All That You Can't Leave Behind.

Kite and Stuck In A Moment are the two tracks we're revealing on Friday 22nd
- at 11.30am and 7.30pm. You'll also find Edge discussing material from the
bands first new album in three years.

We'll be hosting new tracks from the album every week at U2.com - as well as
bringing you the latest news in the countdown to worldwide release of
Beautiful Day.

You can view the Jonas Akerlund directed video for the new single right now
- and there will be more exclusive U2 video in the next week.

It's starting to get exciting......we'll keep you posted !

Best wishes

u2.com

U2.com is powered by  World Online.com


Thursday April 26 5:07 AM ET
Calif. Energy Prices Limited
By H. JOSEF HEBERT, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Responding to growing political pressure, federal
regulators are ordering limited price caps during California electricity
emergencies in an attempt to head off severe price spikes this summer when
the state is expected to face critical power shortages.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission voted 2-1 late Wednesday to regulate
prices whenever California's electricity reserves fall below 7 percent,
triggering a Stage 1 power alert.
FERC chairman Curtis Hebert, a Republican, said the order seeks to
``balance'' the need to encourage investment in power plants and boost badly
needed supply, but also protect against unreasonable prices when supplies
tighten.

California has a three-stage power alert system with Stage 1 warning of
potential supply problems and Stage 3 signaling a requirement to curtail
demand and prepare for likely rolling blackouts. California this summer is
expected to be short at least 3,000 megawatts of power even if temperatures
are normal. State officials have warned of likely frequent power disruptions.

FERC's order is aimed at preventing the most severe price spikes during those
emergency periods, the commissioners said.

Wholesale electricity prices this winter frequently have been 10 or more
times what they were a year ago with prices regularly exceeding $200 per
megawatt hour. Some futures prices for this summer delivery in the West have
been more than $400 per megawatt hour.

A megawatt is enough electricity to serve nearly 1 million homes.

In pushing through the order after a day of intense negotiation among the
three commissioners, Hebert reiterated his strong opposition to broader price
controls based solely on producers' cost of generation. Echoing the White
House, he said he continues to believe ``the best solution to California
problems are market-based solutions.''

He was joined in support of the order by commissioner Linda Breathitt, a
Democrat. She said the decision marked a breakthrough because for the first
time ``we have reached a consensus that price mitigation should occur'' in
the California market.

But another commissioner, Democrat William Massey, called the commission's
action ``paltry'' and a ``half a loaf solution'' because it is too
restrictive. He said price limits should be imposed all the time and not just
during emergency declarations.

``The evidence is persuasive that the problem (of unfair prices) exists 24
hours a day, seven days a week,'' said Massey, who for months has criticized
Hebert and Breathitt for rejecting more sweeping price controls.

He has argued the commission has failed in upholding provision of the Federal
Power Act to ensure fair and reasonable prices in wholesale electricity
markets.

The three commissioners grappled with the price cap issue all day Wednesday,
postponing a public hearing on the matter three times. Finally they emerged
Wednesday evening and approves the measure 2-1 with Massey objecting.

The commission, operating with two of its five seats vacant awaiting Senate
approve for two of President Bush's nominees, has come under intense pressure
to do something about soaring wholesale power prices throughout the West.
Earlier in the week, a group of Senate Democrats and one Republican
introduced legislation to require FERC to impose broader price caps on
electricity markets in the West and peg them to the cost of power production.

The FERC order falls short of that, focusing on California with no price
mitigation program for the Northwest where wholesale electricity costs have
been just as high as in California.
The FERC order ``ignores the Northwest, like we floated out to sea,''
complained Rep. Jay Inslee, D-Wash., who sat in the audience during the
proceedings.

Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Wash., said he had hoped Breathitt might join Massey in
voting for broader price caps, but she did not. ``We'll still have price
gouging and blackouts,'' he said.

However, FERC did direct that an agency investigation into potential refunds
should be extended from California to other parts of the West including
Washington and Oregon. Massey maintained that investigation is far too narrow
and will be ineffective.

And even the price restrictions for California could be short lived. The
price mitigation requirements are contingent on California agreeing to submit
by July 1 a Western regional transmission organization plan, something the
state has opposed.

``The order turns into a pumpkin and will have no effect'' if California does
not join in a regional transmission organization, said Massey.


Please aprove the folowing and I will make the required changes.

Dale

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT on 12/23/99 10:34 AM
---------------------------

David Forster
12/23/99 10:06 AM
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Niamh Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Duncan Needham/LON/ECT@ECT, Rudy
Dautel/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:

Dale,

I have discussed the wording with Rudy and agree that we could change the
wording in the Index long description for Gasoline, #2 and WTI as follows:

Old:

The Index for a month shall be the arithmetic average of the daily
settlement
prices for the prompt month NYMEX West Texas Intermediate Light, Sweet, Crude
Oil
futures contract for each NYMEX trading day of such month.

New:

The Index for a Determination Period shall be the arithmetic average of the
daily
settlement prices for the promptmonth NYMEX West Texas Intermediate Light,
Sweet,
Crude Oil futures contract for each NYMEX trading day of such Determination
Period.

Please run these changes past legal before proceeding. When your changes are
complete, please run the final version past Rudy as well. Please note that
all
Products which reference these Indexes will need the secret squirrel
treatment for
updating.

Niamh/Duncan: Please advise if you are happy for the above change to be
applied
to your products as well.

Thanks,

Dave


Here's a draft.


I wish.  As to your complaint about my failure to tip you off, there were two
primary reasons:  (1) if I told you and got caught I'd go to prison, and,
more importantly, (2) I had no clue. DF  (its better to be lucky than good!)

dhill@wrf.com on 01/21/2000 02:58:19 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: ENE

Yeah, I've noticed it.  Particularly the run-up yesterday.  Hell no, I
don't own any ENE.  Why didn't you tell me this was going to happen?
Between ENE and our good old EMC, you really are closing in on
retirement.....

                    Drew_Fossum@e
                    nron.com             To:     DHill@wrf.com
                                         cc:
                    01/21/00             Subject:     ENE
                    02:41 PM

Check out ENE over the last 30 days.  I'm a few more weeks away from
retirement.  Do you own any?  DF


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
APOLLO, BETH                    FERNLEY DYSON                   Oct 31, 2000
COUSINO, LISA B                 JAMES SCRIBNER                  Oct 27, 2000
JORDAN, MIKE T                  FERNLEY DYSON                   Nov 03, 2000
MASON, HEIDI                    FERNLEY DYSON                   Oct 26, 2000
MCLOUGHLIN, HECTOR              SHEILA H WALTON                 Oct 25, 2000
MURPHY II, THEODORE R           RICHARD B BUY                   Oct 30, 2000
PERLMAN, BETH S                 PHILIPPE A BIBI                 Oct 31, 2000
PORT, DAVID                     THEODORE R MURPHY II            Oct 30, 2000
SCHULTZ, CASSANDRA R            THEODORE R MURPHY II            Nov 03, 2000
SOLMONSON, MARY C               SALLY W BECK                    Oct 31, 2000
STOCK, STEPHEN                  BETH S PERLMAN                  Oct 31, 2000
WALTON, SHEILA H                DAVID OXLEY                     Oct 27, 2000


Coaches,

As you can see we are still in need of the volunteers for this years
tournament.  Please respond to me ASAP with the three names choices of your
volunteers.  Thanks,

Louis Martinez

Hi everyone,

Well I have volunteered to schedule all the volunteers for the NIT
tournament. I drafted Ashley Wagner to help with this task.  I need all the
School Commissioners to contact your coaches and ask them to email me their
3 volunteers asap.  If they do not have email access would you please get
the names and email them to me? Those of you who have the names and have
just been waiting to find out what to do with them, now can unload them on
me.

Ashley Wagner and myself will start calling them (so please include a phone
number!) to see when they would like to work.  The first names we get will
be the first we call so they will get the best choice of fields and times.
So do them a favor and get them in soon!!!

Thanks for your help on this.

Tammie Self
(281)955-5031


Please find attached a copy of the updated Speech List.  If you should have any questions, please let me know.

Tori
3-5769


Approvals from legal.
Thanks,
camille
---------------------- Forwarded by Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron on 08/20/2000
12:44 PM ---------------------------
From: Tana Jones@ECT on 08/18/2000 05:09 PM
To: Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ClickPaper List for 8/18/00


RAC came by and brought up a couple of concerns.  1- the Var on this deal is
over $120m (more than all of ENE combined); they wanted to make me aware of
the size, and they know we are working on it. and 2 - EE&CC; they were
concerned about them doing the deal and their abilities and effects on MTM
treatment.  I told them that they can bid on it but we want others to bid and
that we probably won't use them.  They stated that the deal guys are acting
like EE&CC is a done deal.

Lets discuss.
Thanks,
mike


Taffy:That works for me.  Mark gave me the impression that he would not be
going to Argentina next week so he can join either me or Sara on the
interview.
Carol


Per your request.


Attached please find an updated power credit watchlist dated 12/04/00.
Please direct any comments/questions to the credit hotline, (713) 853-1803

Veronica Gonzalez


Please note new pager number for Steve.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


Greg:
I went to the meeting to look at valuing some of the outstanding contracts.  It will take some time to make sure that we have the correct forward prices on some of these contracts.  I will report back to you soon how all that is going and prepare written summaries to you asap.  Hope this helps under these specific circumstances.
Regards,
Ben


i just mean to flip/flop the traders and orig so they are still sitting together but the trading is next to financial and texas rather than the orig

-----Original Message-----
From: Shively, Hunter S.
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:16 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: John Lavorato Request - Enron Center South

I understand your concern.  However I don't want to separate origination and trading.  Most of our originators work the daily market and need to be close to the traders.

-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:05 PM
To: Shively, Hunter S.
Subject: FW: John Lavorato Request - Enron Center South
Importance: High

any thought to flipping your traders and orig to get all the trading as close to possible?

-----Original Message-----
From: Shepperd, Tammy R.
Sent: Wed 9/5/2001 4:40 PM
To: Black, Don; Gaskill, Chris; Will, Lloyd; Presto, Kevin M.; Duran, W. David; Lagrasta, Fred; Roberts, Mike A.; Arnold, John; Herndon, Rogers; Shively, Hunter S.; Tycholiz, Barry; Vickers, Frank W.; Neal, Scott; Grigsby, Mike
Cc: Finnels-Neal, La Donna; Black, Tamara Jae; Hogan, Irena D.; Rangel, Ina; Choate, Heather; Rode, Tina
Subject: John Lavorato Request - Enron Center South

Attached is the most recent version of the ECS 6th floor layout.  Each team has been assigned a predetermined number of desks.  John has asked that you place your people only in the desks allotted to you.  Assistants should be colored in white where applicable.  Some teams are still in the same area and changes may not be necessary.

If all of your commercial organization does not fit, please send me back a list of those people who will need to be assigned a desk on the fifth floor.

John would like to have a final revision of this by end of day tomorrow (Thursday).

Thanks in advance for your prompt attention,
Tammy
x36589

<<6th floorplan 9.05.xls>>