Mark, FYI - In my estimation this business is no bigger than Mexico or the
Toronto business ie) $25 to $30M in real value with reasonably high risk.  I
see no value in having two different agendas being pushed in S. America.  I
also believe that we could cut overhead and right size the organization and
not loose any capability.  Early estimations are a reduction in budgeted OH
by at least a third to one-half.  Did you or Jeff speak with Jim?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
04:17 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
11/22/2000 04:08 PM
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: See Attached

Jim, my understanding is that there continues to be some discussion on
whether there will be functional seperation of the retail and wholesale
businesses and to what extent and under what strategy these are undertaken.
I am not sure that we want to put ourselves in a box under any structure
until these things are completely ironed out eg) country managers et al.  I'm
not in agreement with any memo that further details the organization beyond
what was outlined in the original memo.  However, I am in agreement that this
needs to get resolved ASAP unfortunately Frevert and Skilling and most of the
first world is out this week.  I ask for your patience.

Lets discuss.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
04:00 PM ---------------------------

James M Bannantine@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/22/2000 05:37 PM
To: David W Delainey@ECT, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R
Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Miguel
Padron/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Randy Young@ECT
cc:
Subject: See Attached

Draft memo on the functional alignment of South America under the new
organization.  Would like to send out to the South America organization
tonight to give people partial information on work in progress.  Silence is
bothering people a lot and the company is at risk of losing people.
Definitive organization memo out in the coming days, after complete
coordination with wholesale and retail in Houston.  Look at the first version
of the memo.  Please reply with any comments asap.


I've forwarded both these e-mails to Tom. He's in a trading meeting right
now, but we'll clear up the energy type when he gets out.

Kate

From: Kimberly Allen on 03/05/2001 11:15 AM CST
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: #516506

Tom entered this trade as Firm and FPL says on their confirmation as
Transmission Contingent. Which is correct?

KI

Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
Kimberly Indelicato Office:713-853-3031
Trading Support Fax:713-646-2443
kallen3@enron.com


I will need to be at my home today and tomorrow at 4 pm for repair
estimates.  I will coordinate my schedule with Kaye.  Sara


Not quite as enlightening as the last email, but much funnier.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT on 12/27/99 09:51
AM ---------------------------

"ANDREW J COWEN" <andrew@b2b123.com> on 12/23/99 12:44:30 PM
To: "Staci Markman" <staci.markman@courts.state.tx.us>, Mark
Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, "'Jeff Masanow'" <Jeff@exchange.nssco.com>, "Litofsky,
Marcus" <Marcus.Litofsky@sci-us.com>, "Rachel Abbott" <patandband@aol.com>,
"Rachel Gary" <rgary@us.oracle.com>, "Maria Hale" <maria.hale@carlberg.com>,
"David Barton" <dave.barton@carlberg.com>, "Brian Fisher"
<brian.fisher@carlberg.com>, "Heather Kristoff" <heather.kristoff@chron.com>,
"Jacki Schwartz" <jschwartz@glesbymarks.com>, "Arthur Polott"
<apolott@bsmpc.com>, "Dina Ginsberg" <dginsber@bindview.com>, "Shara"
<shara@flash.net>, "Terri Lubrano" <terrilubrano@worldnet.att.net>, "Hugh
Morrison" <pilgrimboss@prodigy.net>, "Carey Bradfield-Harvey"
<gph24@aol.com>, "Jeff Estes" <jestes@hbk.com>, "Jed Freedlander"
<jed_freedlander@heliosconsulting.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw:  This is long but definitely worth reading

OK everyone.  This story is why Yankees tell redneck jokes.

> > This is an e-mail from some guy named J.D. Horne, who, according to the
> > messages that were attached to this, is not a 21 year-old frat boy, but
an
> > attorney of indeterminate age. He sent it to his friend Brian Brice and
it
> > got forwarded around the country. You have to give the guy some props
for
> > being self-deprecating...but I hope I never meet him on game day.
> >
> > ******
> > A chronology of events for Saturday, December 4, 1999, and the early
morning
hours of Sunday, December 5, 1999:
6:00 Arise, play the Eyes of Texas and Texas Fight at full-freaking blast
6:20 Get in car, drive to New Braunfels
7:30 Tee off (me and a buddy were the FIRST tee-time of the morning)
8:50 Turn 9 (crack open first beer)
8:53 Crack open second beer
8:58 Crack open...(you get the idea)
10:30 Finish 18 (holes, as well as beers), sign scorecard for smoooooth 95
10:35 Headed for San Antonio
10:50 Buy three 18-packs for pre- and post-game festivities
11:10 We decide we don't have enough booze, so we double-back to a liquor
store and buy the good ol' 750 ml plastic bottle "Traveler" Jim Beam
11:50 Arrive at the tailgate spot. Awesome day. Not a single cloud in the
sky. About 70 degrees.
11:55 I decide that we're going to kick the shit out of Nebraska.
11:56 I tell my first Nebraska fan to go fuck himself.
12:15 The UT band walks by on the way to the Alamodome. We're on the second
floor of a two-story parking garage on the corner (a couple hundred of us).
We're hooting and hollering like wildmen. The band doubles back to the
street right below us and serenades us with Texas Fight and The Eyes of
Texas. AWESOME MOMENT.
12:25 In the post-serenade serendipity, 50-100 grown men are bumping chests
with one another, each and every one of them now secure and certain of the
fact that we are going to kick the shit out of Nebraska.
1:00 The Nebraska band walks by on the way to the Alamodome. Again, we hoot
and holler like wildmen. Again, the band doubles back and stops right below
us to serenade us, this time, however, with the Nebraska fight songs.
*Although somewhat impressed by their spirit and verve, we remain convinced
that we are going to kick the shit out of Nebraska.
1:30 I begin the walk to the Alamodome, somehow managing to stuff the
"Traveler" and 11 cans of beer into my pants.
1:47 I am in line surrounded by Nebraska fans. They are taunting me. I am
taunting back, still certain that we are going to kick the shit out of
Nebraska. I decide to challenge a particularly vocal Nebraska fan to play
 what I now call and will forever be remembered as "Cell-Phone Flop Out."
Remember flop out for a dollar? The rules are similar. I tell this Nebraska
jackass that if he's so confident in his team, he should "flop out" his cell
 phone RIGHT NOW and make plane reservations to Phoenix for the Fiesta
Bowl.
 And then I spoke these memorable words: "And not those damn refundable
tickets, either! You request those non-refundable, non-transferrable
sons-of-bitches!" He backs down. He is unworthy. I call Southwest Airlines
and buy two tickets to Phoenix, non-refundable and non-transferrable. Price:
 $712. He is humbled. He lowers his head in shame. I raise my cell phone in
 triumph to the cheers of hundreds of Texas fans. I am KING and these are my
 subjects. I distribute the 11 beers in my pants to the cheering masses. I
 RULE the pre-game kingdom.
2:34 Kickoff. Brimming with confidence, I open the Traveler and pour my
first stiffy.
2:45 I notice something troubling: Nebraska is big. Nebraska is fast.
Nebraska is very pissed off at Texas.
3:01 The first quarter mercifully ends. 9 yards total offense for Texas.
Zero first downs for Texas. I'm still talking shit. I pour another stiffy
 from the Traveler.
3:36 Four minutes to go in the first half: the Traveler is a dead soldier.

I buy my first $5 beer from the Alamodome merchants. While I am standing in
line, a center snap nearly decapitates Major Applewhite and rolls out of the
end zone. Safety.
3:56 Halftime score: Nebraska 15, Texas 0. I wish I had another Traveler.
4:11 While urinating next to a Nebraska fan in the bathroom at halftime, I
attempt to revive the classic Brice-ism from the South Bend bathroom:
"Hey, buddy, niiiiiiiiice cock." He is unamused.
4:21 I buy my 2nd and 3rd $5 beer from the Alamodome merchants. I share my
beer with two high school girls sitting behind me. Surprisingly, they are
equipped with a flask full of vodka. I send them off to purchase Sprites, so
that we may consume their vodka. I have not lost faith.  Nebraska is a bunch
of pussies.
4:51 No more vodka. The girls sitting behind me have fled for their lives.

I purchase two more $5 beers from the Alamodome merchants.
5:18 Score is Nebraska 22, Texas 0. I am beginning to lose faith. This
normally would trouble me, but I am too drunk to see the football field.
5:27 I call Southwest Airlines: "I'm sorry, sir. Those tickets have been
confirmed and are non-refundable and non-transferrable."
5:37 I try to start a fight with every person behind the concession counter.
As it turns out, the Alamodome has a policy that no beer can be sold when
there is less than 10 minutes on the game clock. I am enraged by this
policy. I ask loudly: "Why the fuck didn't you announce last call over the
fucking PA system??!!"
5:49 Back in my seats, I am slumped in my chair in defeat. All of a sudden,
the Texas crowd goes absolutely nuts. "Whazzis?," I mutter, awaking from my
coma, "Iz we winnig? Did wez scort?" Alas, the answer is no, we were not
winning and we did not score. The largest (by far) cheer of the day from
the
Texas faithful occurred when the handlers were walking back to the tunnel
and Bevo stopped to take a gargantuan shit all over the letters "S", "K",
and "A" in the "Nebraska" spelled out in their end zone.  I cheer wildly.

I pick up the empty Traveler bottle and stick my tongue in it. I am thirsty.
6:16 Nebraska fans are going berserk as I walk back to the truck. I would
taunt them with some off-color remarks about their parentage, but I am too
drunk to form complete sentences. With my last cognitive thought of the
evening, I take solace in the fact that if we had not beaten them in
October, they would be playing Florida State for the national
championship.
6:30 Back in the car. On the way back to Austin for the 8:00 Texas-Arizona
tip off. We can still salvage the day! I crack open a beer.  *It is warm.

I don't care.
7:12 We have stopped for gas. I am hungry. I go inside the store. I walk
past the beer frig. I notice a Zima. I've never had a Zima. I wonder if it's
any good. I pull a Zima from the frig. I twist the top off and drink the
Zima in three swallows. Zima sucks. I replace the empty bottle in the frig.
7:17 There is a Blimpie Subs in the store. I walk to where the ingredients
are, where the person usually makes the sub. There is no one there. I lean
over the counter and scoop out half a bucket of black olives. I eat them.

I am still hungry. I lean further over the counter and grab approximately
two
pounds of Pastrami. I walk out of the store grunting and eating Pastrami.
The patrons in the store fear me. I don't care.
8:01 We are in South Austin. I have been drinking warm beer and singing
Brooks and Dunn tunes for over an hour. My truck-mate is tired of my
singing. He suggests that perhaps Brooks and Dunn have written other good
songs besides "You're Going to Miss Me When I'm Gone" and "Neon Moon" and
that maybe listening to only those two songs, ten times each was a bit
excessive. Perhaps, he suggests, I could just let the CD play on its own.

I tell him to fuck off and restart "Neon Moon."
8:30 We arrive at the Erwin Center. My truckmate, against my loud and
profane protestations, parks on the top floor of a nearby parking garage.

I
tell him he's an idiot. I tell him we will never get out. I tell him we may
as well pitch a fucking tent here. He ignores me. I think he's still pissed
about the Brooks and Dunn tunes. I whistle "Neon Moon" loudly.
8:47 I am rallying. I have 4 warm beers stuffed in my pants. We're going to
kick the shit out of Arizona.
9:11 Halftime score: Texas 31, Arizona 29. I am pleased. I go to the
bathroom to pee for the 67th time today. I giggle to myself because of the
new opportunity to do "the bathroom Brice." There are no Arizona fans in the
bathroom. I am disappointed. I tell myself (out loud) that I have a
"Niiiiiice cock." No one is amused but me.
9:41 I walk to the bathroom while drinking Bud Light out of a can.  Needless
to say, they do not sell beer at the Erwin Center,much less Bud Light out

of
a can. I am stopped by an usher: "Where did you get that, sir?" I tell him
(no shit): "Oh, the cheerleaders were throwing them up with those little
plastic footballs. Would you mind throwing this away for me?" I take the
last swig and hand it to him. He is confused. I pretend I'm going to the
bathroom, but I run away giggling instead. I duck into some entrance to
avoid the usher, who is now pursuing me. I sneak into a large group of
people and sit down. The usher walks by harmlessly. I am giggling like a
little girl. I crack open another can of Bud Light.
9:52 I am lost. In my haste to avoid the usher, I have lostmy bearings. I
have no ticket stub. I cannot find my seats. Texas is losing.
10:09 Texas is being screwed by the refs. I am enraged. I have cleared out
the seats around me because I keep removing my hat and beating the
surrounding chairs with it. A concerned fan asks if I'm OK and perhaps I
shouldn't take it so seriously. I tell him to fuck off.
10:15 After the fourth consecutive "worst fucking call I have EVER seen," I
attempt to remove my hat again to begin beating inanimate objects.  However,
on this occasion I miscalculate and I thumbnail myself in my left eyelid,
leaving a one-quarter inch gash over my eye. I am now bleeding into my left
eye and all over my shirt. "Perhaps," I think to myself, "I'm taking this a
bit seriously."
10:22 I am standing in the bathroom peeing. I'm so drunk I am swaying and
grunting. I have a bloody napkin pressed on my left eye. My pants are
bloody. I have my (formerly) white shirt wrapped around my waist. I look
like I should be in an episode of Cops.
10:43 Texas has lost. I put my bloody white shirt back on my body and make
my way for the exits. I am stopped every 20 seconds by a good
samaritan/cop/security guard to ask me why I am covered in blood, but I
merely grunt incoherently and keep moving.
10:59 With my one good eye, I have located the parking garage. I walk up six
flights of stairs, promise that when I see my friend I will punch him in the
face for making me walk up six flights of stairs, find the truck, and
collapse in a heap in the bed of the truck. I look around and notice that
traffic is lined up all the way around the garage, six whole flights, and

no one is moving. I take a nap.
11:17 I awake from my nap. I see my friend in the driver's seat. I lift my
head to look out the bed of the truck and notice that traffic is lined up
all the way around the garage, six whole flights, and no one is moving.  I
am too tired to punch my friend. I call my friend a "Stupid cocksucker."
11:31 I lift my head to look out the bed of the truck and notice that
traffic is lined up all the way around the garage, six whole flights, and no
one is moving. I call my friend a "Stupid cocksucker."
11:38 I lift my head to look out the bed of the truck and notice that
traffic is lined up all the way around the garage, six whole flights, and no
one is moving. I call my friend a "Stupid cocksucker."
11:47 I lift my head to look out the bed of the truck and notice that
traffic is lined up all the way around the garage, six whole flights, and

no one is moving. I call my friend a "Stupid cocksucker."
11:58 I am jostled. The truck is moving. I lift my head to look out the bed
of the truck and notice that traffic is beginning to move on the second
floor. I jump out of the truck, walk to the edge of the parking facility,
and pee off the sixth floor onto the street below. My friend looks at me
like I just anally violated his minor sister. I turn around and pee on the
front of his truck while singing the lyrics to "Neon Moon."
12:11 We are moving. We are out of beer. I jump from the truck and go from
vehicle to vehicle until someone gives me two beers. I am happy. I return to
my vehicle.
12:26 We have emerged from the parking facility. We make our way to my
apartment and find Ed sitting on the couch with a freshly opened bottle of
Glenlivet on the coffee table in front of him. We are all going to die
tonight.
12:59 We have finished three-quarters of the bottle of Glenlivet. We decide
it would be a wonderful idea to go dancing at PollyEsther's. Ed has to pee.
He walks down the hall to our apartment and directly into the full length
 mirror at the end of the hall, smashing it into hundreds of pieces.  We
giggle uncontrollably and leave for PollyEsther's.
1:17 The PollyEsther's doorman laughs uncontrollably at our efforts to enter
his club. "Fellas," he says in between his fits of spastic laughter, "I've
 been working this door for almost a year. I've been working doors in this
town for almost 5 years. And I can honestly say that I ain't never seen
three drunker mother fuckers than you three. Sorry, can't let you in." We
attempt to reason with him. He laughs harder.
1:44 We find a bar that lets us in. We take two steps in the door and hear
"Last call for alcohol!" I turn to the group and mutter: "See, dat wasn't
that fuckin' hard. Day don't fuckin' do that at the Awamo...the awaom...the
alab...fuck it, that stadium we was at today..." We order 6 shots of tequila
and three beers.
2:15 Back on the street. We need food. We hail a cab to take us the two and
one half blocks to Katz's. The cab fare is $1.60. We give him $10 and tell
him to keep it.
2:17 There is a 20 minute wait. We give the hostess $50. We are seated
immediately.
2:25 We order two orders of fried pickles, a Cobb salad, a bowl of soup, two
orders of Blueberry blintzes, two Reuben sandwiches, a hamburger, two cheese
stuffed potatoes, an order of fries, and an order of onion rings.
2:39 The food arrives. We are all asleep with our heads onthe table. The
waiter wakes us up. We eat every fucking bit of our food. Most of the
restaurant patrons around us are disgusted. We don't give a fuck. The tab is
$112 with tip.
2:46 I'm sleepy.
9:12 I wake up next to a strange woman. She is the bartender at Katz's.
She is not pretty.
> >
>

 - att1.htm


Should we (or ESCA) start looking for opportunities like this now to get the
word out?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
07:30 AM ---------------------------

"Christina Forbes" <CFORBES@eei.org> on 08/18/2000 02:54:52 PM
To: <Anthony.Duenner@enron.com>, <chris.gaffney@enron.com>,
<dallegre@enron.com>, <ddorman@enron.com>, <dfossum@enron.com>,
<eaafedt@enron.com>, <fbay@enron.com>, <fking@enron.com>,
<jhartso@enron.com>, <JKeller@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>,
<julia.murray@enron.com>, <Lhuber@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>,
<meyer@enron.com>, <mpavlou@enron.com>, <rfrank@enron.com>,
<scorman@enron.com>, <scovino@enron.com>, <skean@enron.com>,
<snovose@enron.com>, <stweed@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: EEI Conference Series on RTOs and Markets: Mark Your Calendars

EEI is pleased to announce a three-conference series addressing RTOs and
electricity market design.

*  RTOs and Market Design:  How to Get Electricity Markets to Work.
September 28 and 29, Hilton Washington Embassy Row.
Current draft agenda attached.  This conference features a star-studded cast
of speakers addressing market design issues from all around the country,
Keynote by Commissioner William Massey.

*  RTOs:  The October Filings
November 2 and 3, Washington D.C. (hotel information to come).
Team leaders from each of the RTOs under development that must file in
October will present their RTO plans.  EEI will have summaries of all of the
major filings available.   This conference will give everyone a chance to be
on the same page as to what the RTO filings propose and to learn what is
being developed around the country.

*  RTOs:  The January Filings
February 8 and 9, Washington, D.C. (hotel information to come).
Team leaders from each of the approved ISOs that will file in January will
present their RTO plans.  EEI will have summaries of all of the major filings
available.  This conference will complete the initial tour of the RTO plans,
nationwide.

These three conferences will give you the information you need to understand
tomorrow's electric business and a chance to network with leaders in the
industry.

For further information and conference registration materials, email Judy
Mastin, jmastin@eei.org.

We hope to see you there,

Christina C. Forbes
Director, Federal Commercial and Regulatory Policy
Edison Electric Institute
P 202 508 5104
F 202 508 5445
cforbes@eei.org

 - RTOMktDesAgenda.doc


On the Calpine meeting Thursday, should I go and/or should you go?

The meeting we had today was not real focused and I want to make sure that your personal touch is on that presentation at a minimum.

Your thoughts?

GP


Sounds good - I think you have a great opportunity in this market - I would
suggest staffing aggressively in order to take the first mover advantage.  I
note the associate needs.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000
02:17 PM ---------------------------

Rob Milnthorp
05/12/2000 12:37 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Status Report, CRP & DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIALS

Dave, I missed one point regarding the Toronto trader. Lavorato and Belden
have identified an associate and he's interested in coming to Toronto. He is
in Toronto today meeting with DeVries. As a sidebar, our new office space in
Toronto is extremely impressive (cost was Cdn $500K) and is a great selling
feature. Hopefully this puts the trading associate "over the top".

Regards,
Milnthorp
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT on 05/12/2000 11:30
AM ---------------------------

Rob Milnthorp
05/12/2000 08:27 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT, Dawn Doucet/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Status Report, CRP & DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIALS

Dave, thanks for the note. Regarding an update for Toronto, we made an offer
to a senior industrial marketer yesterday  (Jeff Borg - 10 years experience)
while I was in Toronto. I believe that he will accept. In addition, Paul is
interviewing for one more deal maker (targeting John Guerro at Duke - an
industrial gas marketer) and a manager for ENERconnect   (has interviewed a
couple - meeting with Doug Jones from TD Bank next week).

Scott Gilbert who is running our volume management is out recruiting for
backoffice staff (needs 5 specialists). No success here as of yet.

Mark Haedicke, Peter Keohane and myself are working on transferring Chris
Gaffney (Canadian Lawyer) to work in Toronto. Chris is interested and both
Mark and myself think it would be a good fit/career move.

Dawn, Paul and myself are devising a more aggressive recruiting strategy for
Toronto for both Paul's and Scott's groups as our presence in Toronto is
limited. This may include full page ads in the Globe, use of head hunters
and/or Super Saturdays. With 2 million people in Toronto, we should be having
more success in recruiting high quality individuals.

It is my understanding that 94 new analysts are starting this August in
Houston. I need a minimum of 5 (2 for Toronto, 3 for Calgary). I have asked
Dawn to make this happen, but if there is any way that you can exercise your
influence to assist in making this happen, that would be much appreciated.

Regards
Milnthorp


Jeff,
I seldom hear of anyone as fearless  as you.
I'm a VC.  Small $10M fund I first started 3 yrs ago.  Delivered a 15x return. That incls total money placed, so the return could  increase as our portfolio companies mature. I'm currently preparing to raise a  second fund of $60M.  Why do I write?  I'm looking at technologies in  your territory.  Could certainly use your help....likely to be beneficial  to you too.
If you are up this way, do feel free to  call.
Best,
Petra
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petra  Franklin
VAULT CAPITAL
Smith Tower  506 2nd Ave.,  30th  Floor   Seattle, WA  98104
Tel: 206 625-1700     Fax: 206 625-2381   Cell: 206 478-4786


eSource presents Free Lexis-Nexis Basic Training  for all Enron employees outside the Houston office.  Using Placeware, an interactive web learning tool, you can participate in this training session from anywhere in the world.

June 12          8:00-9:00 CST
June 12 	 3:00 -  4:00 CST

Basic

Lexis-Nexis Basic is geared to the novice or prospective user.  You will learn the basics of getting around nexis.com and of the news and company information available on Lexis-Nexis.

Please RSVP to Stephanie E. Taylor at 713-345-7928 or stephanie.e.taylor@enron.com.
We will email you instructions for Placeware.

Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for additional training sessions and vendor presentations.

http://esource.enron.com


My thought is that the Enron contract is probably going away anyhow so that it makes sense to set this up for Jan 1.  I think the charges should be recorded to the balancing tools account.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cady, Rachel
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 8:27 AM
To:	Corman, Shelley; Lokey, Teb
Subject:	Gas Daily Table
Importance:	High

I finally got a price quote of $1990 per year on a package deal for one user.  Platts doesn't sell the data without a subsciption to the daily publication. The package includes the daily issues and data(table) and back issues and data.

Please let me know if you want me to go ahead and sign up for this package. I'll have to let Platts know the user's name and billing information etc...

Thanks.


I hear Oz will be there, too.  How fun!

From: Claudette Harvey/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/01/2001 03:50 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: FW: We'll Miss You Steffy.......

i do, i do.......it just wouldn't be the same without ya!

smile

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 3:47 PM
To: Harvey, Claudette
Subject: Re: FW: We'll Miss You Steffy.......

if you insist...

From: Claudette Harvey/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/01/2001 03:35 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: We'll Miss You Steffy.......

why don't you come?

claude

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Harvey, Claudette
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:43 PM
To: Lalji, Farouk
Subject: FW: We'll Miss You Steffy.......
Importance: High

here you go.......

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Harvey, Claudette
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:10 PM
To: Gardner, Stephanie
Subject: FW: We'll Miss You Steffy.......
Importance: High

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Harvey, Claudette
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 3:22 PM
To: Yzaguirre, Max; Duffy, Matthew; Sabine, Marc; Helton, Susan; Vu, Nancy
H.; Ogden, Mary; Rimbau, Robert W.; Cavazos, Manuel; Ramirez, Garibaldis;
McCaig, Duncan; Tingleaf, Drew; Ahn, Chris; Curry, Mike; Jester, Larry;
Cross, Edith; Rode, Tina; Harvey, Claudette; Martinez, Judy; Parks, Michelle;
Gordon, Joe; Pagan, Ozzie; Butler, Monica; Rodriguez, Cecilia; Olvera,
Paulita; Blanch Lopez; Maldonado, Marianella; Moore, John; Gimble, Mathew;
Johnston, Elizabeth; Wang, Steve; Nall, Leslie; Coleman, Mike; Spiller,
Brent; Harris, Charles; Black, Tamara Jae; Suarez, Juan; Brown, Michael;
Kroll, Heather; 'jhunt_vitoltvl@yahoo.com'; 'ssorrels_vitoltvl@yahoo.com';
Chapman, Christy; Celedon, Adriana; Celedon-Renovato, Esther; Moreno, Douglas
V.; Mena, Luis; Baldwin, Sherri; Roberts, Chaun; Dean, Clint; Mouton, Stacie;
Stewart, Jennifer N.; Holcombe, Tina ; Garberding, Michael; Gilbert-smith,
Doug; Irvin, Steve; Ballato, Russell; 'philly2323@hotmail.com';
'bruce.sukaly@cinergy.com'; 'david.livingston@cinergy.com'; Anderson, Kristi;
Dutta, Tom; Kuykendall, Kevin; Roberts, Chaun; Thompkins, Jason
Subject: We'll Miss You Steffy.......

Please be advised all information submitted herein is prepared solely to make
you smile, is not so confidential and should be shown to or discussed with
any third party.  The information submitted herein is not, or intended to be,
offensive in any way. To some the content of this email may be duty
hindering, and just may cause you to blow off working the rest of the day.
Regarding the following, no binding agreements will arise until everyone is
convincingly inebriated. Certainly all invitees mutually accept this
definitive agreement, containing mutually agreeable provisions, including,
but not limited to, those relating to fun, fun, and more fun.......I consider
the structures herein obligatory, and that you will be compelled to
definitely dig it.......you have been warned

 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>

I would like to personally invite all of you to join us in saying Farewell,
Adios, Bidaya, Ciao, Peace
out man,....Goodbye, to Stephanie Gardner.  As some of you are already know ,
Stephanie is leaving Enron to pursue a position at  Cinergy working under
Bruce Sukaly.  Her last day is tomorrow, June 1, and although it just kills
us to see
you go Steffy, we don't mind kickin' you out in style. (smile)  Please join
me in congratulating Stephanie, and wishing
her nothing but the best in the future.  Let's make sure she doesn't forget
us too soon.....And what better way to do that than.......you know it,
baby.......HAPPY HOUR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>  << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>
   When?: Friday, 6/1/01
     5:30 pm - until they throw us out

   Where?: Slainte Irish Pub
     509 Main St.

   Why?: Because We Love You, Steffy!!!!

Hope to see y'all there,
claude


NRG Thermal and Millenium Energy are the parties.  More specific names to
come.


Mike/Jeff,

These types of opportunities will continue to come up.  We could certainly
handle the 13MW and it would be interesting to pursue.  We have also seen
another opportunity to merchant finance a power plant for another new
entrant.  As you can imagine, if we passed these to EPower they are not
likely to get done.

any thoughts?

Joe

Joseph P. Hirl
Enron Japan Corp.
81 3 5219 4500
81 3 5219 4510 (Fax)
www.enron.co.jp
----- Forwarded by Joseph P Hirl/AP/Enron on 06/01/2001 12:06 AM -----

	Takumi Ariga
	05/30/2001 10:11 AM

		 To: Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: ALSTOM captured an opportunity

= Confidential =

Joe,

This is an updated information about ALSTOM's latest activity.

Referring to Enron Japan-ALSTOM Japan Coorporation Meeting for Vendor Finance
at Enron Japan, ALSTOM found an opportunity.

Customer:

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (Hyogo Pref. 60 Hz)
Facility:
- Heavy C firing steam generator without electrcity generation
- Electricity consumtpion 2 MW.
- In terms of permits and land, although further investigation is required,
in general, it seems acceptable so far.

ALSTOM's proposal to Goodyear Tire & Rubber
- Heavy Oil Firing 15 MW Gas Turbine Co-generation system
(Goodyear tire & Rubber has no money to invest).
- 2 MW for factory and 13 MW for market
- 15-18 months for delivery (estimated)
- Plant cost: 13-15 M$ (estimated)

Next Action required
- EJ to let ALSTOM know deal structure

Issues:
(1) If Enron Japan wants to pursue this opportunity, EJ to respond to them in
a timely manner, since ALSTOM made an effort to find the opportunity that the
GT may be able to dispatch electricity next year as per EJ's request.
(2) As per Enron Japan's restructuring, if Enron Japan does not want to
pursue the opportunity, there may be two options:
- To explain the situstion to ALSTOM and to be prepared for positive
relationship discontinued (potentially possible)
- To transfer this project E-power by saying, for example, physical asset
related projects are now handled by E-power.

Please advise me of your comments on the above.

Thanks and regards,

******************************
Takumi Ariga
Enron Japan Corp.
Tel:  03-5219-4500
Fax:  03-5219-4510
Email:takumi.ariga@enron.com


Dan, Bruce Kohrs of Keyspan left me a message this weekend with respect to
the schedule 'A' that they would like attached.  Assuming that the central
desk has agreed to the contents of schedule 'A' - and they have been involved
in drafting this document - I don't see a lot of commercial risk, especially
given the lack of 'damages' in the event of any defaults to schedule 'A'.  My
understanding was that we would all work together on a reasonable efforts
basis to allow gas to flow daily.  They contents of schedule 'A' and its true
enforceability does not seem to really change the spirit of the agreement.
If they are really adamant about including the schedule 'A', and the central
desk has reviewed and expressly agreed to its contents, then I would not
object to including the schedule 'A' as part of the contract.

Grant

Dan J Hyvl
02/02/2001 11:56 AM
To: Grant Oh/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:Enron/Crestar AOS purchase and sale agreement

Grant,
 Now they want us to consider it.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001 11:55 AM -----

	"Kleiner, Michael" <Michael.Kleiner@Crestar-Energy.com>
	02/02/2001 11:22 AM

		 To: "'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'" <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>
		 cc: "Kohrs, Bruce" <Bruce_Kohrs@gulf.ca>
		 Subject: RE:Enron/Crestar AOS purchase and sale agreement

Attn: Mr. Dan J. Hvyl

We are wondering if you received our fax of January 30, 2001 and if so
whether you have had an opportunity to consider it.

Gulf Canada Resources Limited

Per: Michael Kleiner,  Law Department
(403) 233-3330


The following is a link to the Bureau of State Audits' March 2001 report
"Energy Deregulation; The Benefits of Competition Were Undermined by
Structural Flaws in the Market, Unsuccessful Oversight, and
Uncontrollable Competitive Forces" which was referenced in today's
Select Committee to Investigate Price Manipulation of the Wholesale
Energy Market hearing.

http://www.bsa.ca.gov/bsa/pdfs/20001341.pdf


Please forward to Julie Gomez and coordinate your activities with Julie, who is acting on my behalf in front of Kern as a result of Stephanie traveling.

Any questions, call me.

BT


Good to go.  Thanks

Darla Saucier@ENRON
04/04/2001 11:06 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Ogy


Chris:

Since the 30-day window for setting up the escrow account on Project Blue
Dog is nearing its term, I wanted to check in.  As I recall, Kathleen
Carnahan had prepared the Incumbency Certificate required by Citibank.   In
addition, Carolyn Campbell indicated to me that Andrea Mahar was her contact
at Citibank on the Delta deal.  Andrea's number is 212-657-1007, and she
will likely ask regarding the nature/timing/amounts of the disbursements.
In past deals, Citibank has provided us with a fee schedule and a list of
money market investment options, so I imagine we will need to ask Andrea for
copies of the same.  According to Carolyn, Andrea might refer you to a woman
named Estelle Lawrence at 212-657-2076, but the initial contact needs to be
with Andrea.  Finally, an electronic copy of the negotiated Escrow Agreement
is attached.  We will need to have Citibank sign off on this document as
soon as possible.

Please call me if I can help out in any way.  My direct dial is
713-751-3244.

Regards,

Marisa

-----Original Message-----
From: DeBerry, Jeremiah A. [mailto:JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 10:15 AM
To: 'mreuter@kslaw.com'
Subject: ESCROW AGREEMENT

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 05/14/01 11:14:47
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of
conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are
two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.
If you have any questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

============================================================================
==
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."

============================================================================
==

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To:
Subject:
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 12:15:29 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed ;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C0DC90.646B5150"

 - ATT112968.txt
 - ATT112969.htm
 - 757N03!.DOC


Please add Carole Frank to the list.  Her NT username is cfrank2.

Thanks.

DG    3-9573


Pulpex Bulletin for Tuesday, November 6, 2001

Market News:

NBSK ------------------------------------------------------------
Nov01     405.00   413.00   407.00   407.00   407.00     1    79
Dec01     410.00   418.00        -        -        -     -   107
Jan02     415.00   430.00        -        -        -     -    36
Mar02     425.00   445.00        -        -        -     -   153
Jun02     449.00   466.00        -        -        -     -    40
Sep02     470.00   481.00        -        -        -     -    35
Dec02     480.00   497.00        -        -        -     -    15
Mar03     490.00        -        -        -        -     -     -

BEK -------------------------------------------------------------
Nov01     399.00   409.00        -        -        -     -    26
Dec01     402.00   412.00        -        -        -     -    30
Jan02          -        -        -        -        -     -     -
Mar02          -        -        -        -        -     -     -

Settlement Prices Futures
          Today      Chg      Prev
NBSK -------------------------------
Nov01    407.00     -6.00    413.00
Dec01    414.00     -4.00    418.00
Jan02    422.50     -2.50    425.00
Mar02    435.00     +2.50    432.50
Jun02    457.50     +2.50    455.00
Sep02    475.50     +0.50    475.00
Dec02    488.50     +0.00    488.50
Mar03    503.50     +0.00    503.50

BEK --------------------------------
Nov01    404.00     -1.00    405.00
Dec01    407.00     -1.00    408.00
Jan02    414.00     -1.00    415.00
Mar02    421.00     -1.00    422.00

The above tables should ideally be viewed using Courier or other fixed fonts.
During Pulpex opening hours (0830-1600 UK Time, 0930-1700 CET),prices
are distributed on our web page: http://www.pulpex.com

If you would like someone else to receive this bulletin or to cancel your own
please mail: info@pulpex.com or fax: +44 20 7065 8941


You need to kick some butt here

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bouillion, James L.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:41 AM
To:	Redmond, Brian; Clayton, Paul; Coffey Jr., Jim; Azore, Jacquelyn
Cc:	Whiting, Greg; Gruesen, Karen; Helton, Susan; Koehler, Anne C.; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: Replacement Cost Values

The 2001 annual allocated premium for these assets for property insurance is $670,000 based upon ENA's 2001 reported value of approximately $470,000,000.  The pro-rata credit for 7 months, assuming a 5-31-01 sale date, would be $390,833.

Underwriters require an update of values and exposures annually at renewal. Gathering these values within Enron normally requires 30 to 45 days.  We use these same values in the allocation system. Unless the value change is significant, the actual cost of insurance to the outside insurers will not change  Once you complete your entire study of replacement cost values, we can discuss whether approaching underwriters is warranted.

 If we internally adjust your allocation mid-year, we must move the premium that we take away from you to the other participants in the program.  As you know, the remainder of Enron did not stand still while you sold Bammel.  We have not tried this before, however, I suspect if approached with the additional premium as a result reducing ENA's allocation, all the other operating entities would want to re-submit their revised  values as well and we would find ourselves in a constant state of adjustment.  In view of the time required, this is neither practical nor cost effective for Enron.  In view of the relatively small numbers, I doubt that Corp. would entertain this proposition either, however, we can approach them if you wish.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Redmond, Brian
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:26 AM
To:	Clayton, Paul; Coffey Jr., Jim; Azore, Jacquelyn
Cc:	Whiting, Greg; Gruesen, Karen; Helton, Susan; Koehler, Anne C.; Kitchen, Louise; Bouillion, James L.
Subject:	RE: Replacement Cost Values

Paul:

Please let me know how much of the 2000 insurance premium is being allocated to the approx. $700MM of HPL assets.  This charge is effectively "a cost of capital" and should be re-allocated to other groups with insured assets or should remain at Corp.

Regards,
Brian

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Clayton, Paul
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 8:43 AM
To:	Redmond, Brian; Coffey Jr., Jim; Azore, Jacquelyn
Cc:	Whiting, Greg; Gruesen, Karen; Helton, Susan; Koehler, Anne C.; Kitchen, Louise; Bouillion, James L.
Subject:	RE: Replacement Cost Values

Brian:

This insurance is purchased on a portfolio basis with payment to underwriters at inception of the coverage. Values are adjusted annually at renewal. The premiums are allocated to the participating entities as part of the budget process and insignificant additions and deletions of assets do not normally result in premiums additions or refunds.  In the event that we discontinue premiums to North America for HLP, we have no mechanism to allocate that premium to the other assets that continue to be insured. In the event of a significant divestiture, underwriters may consider a refund, however, the values discussed below would not likely be significant when compared to Enron's values as a whole. Additionally, Enron's adverse loss experience affects the underwriters ability to return premium for small divestitures.

At renewal, 4/01/02, North America's revised property values will be declared to underwriters as part of Enron's overall values and your premium allocation will adjust depending upon your values and loss experience as compared to the rest of Enron.

Regards,

Paul

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Redmond, Brian
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 5:31 PM
To:	Coffey Jr., Jim; Clayton, Paul; Azore, Jacquelyn
Cc:	Whiting, Greg; Gruesen, Karen; Helton, Susan; Koehler, Anne C.; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: Replacement Cost Values

Paul:

Please confirm that ENA will not bear any insurance costs for the HPL assets for the second half of 2001 and the balance of years going forward?  If this is not the case, then we need to meet and discuss why this is not the case.

Thanks,
Brian

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Coffey Jr., Jim
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 5:25 PM
To:	Clayton, Paul; Azore, Jacquelyn
Cc:	Redmond, Brian; Whiting, Greg; Gruesen, Karen; Helton, Susan; Koehler, Anne C.
Subject:	RE: Replacement Cost Values

Paul
In addition to the 188,371,296 property value for Bammel Lease that you mentioned below there was also a value on your spreadsheet for Bammel Gas Storage of 267,000,000.  Requirements to insure both of these amounts should be with AEP not Enron and thus the 2002 Plan Premium Allocations of $754,096 on the Bammel Gas Storage 267,000,000 value and $924,433 on the Bammel Lease value of 188,371,296 should not be needed.

Jackie
Please remove these amounts from the ENA-HPL 2002 Plan.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Clayton, Paul
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 5:10 PM
To:	Coffey Jr., Jim
Subject:	RE: Replacement Cost Values

Jim:
As discussed for the purposes of the 2002 Insurance Budget, we will delete the Bammel Lease (1409) property values of $188,371,296. We will advise the insurers effective this past June to delete these assets and will attempt to receive a refund. However, as respects asset divestitures, insurers have not been inclined in the past to refund premiums for comparatively small divestitures in view of our adverse loss experience. However, if we are successful in receiving a credit, we will refund the premium.

I will discuss with Karen and Brian the other remaining assets.

Regards,

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Clayton, Paul
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 2:13 PM
To:	Coffey Jr., Jim
Subject:	Replacement Cost Values

Jim:
Please update accordingly.
Thanks,

 << File: ENAREPLACEMENT COSTS 2001.xls >>


karen johnson
1362 waterloo lane, 36
gardnerville, NV 89410
pagoo2@webtv.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

karen johnson


new file:  Theriot issues

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


plz call re: contact w/pg&e 415.782.7822


Twanda, what do we need to do with this information?  How do we get Emma
paid?  Michelle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.
----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 01:18 PM -----

	Legal Temp 6
	06/30/2000 01:08 PM

		 To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Hours - w/c 6/26/00

Michelle, here are my hours for this week.

Monday 26 - 7h 45m
Tuesday 27 - 4h 45m
Wednesday 28 - 7h 45m
Thursday 29 - 8h
Friday - 8h

Total Hours - 36h 15m

Thanks

Emma


> The Elmo Misunderstanding
>
> A new employee is hired at the Tickle Me Elmo factory. The personnel
> manager explains her duties, and tells her to report to work promptly at
> 8:00 AM.  The next day at 8:45AM, there's a knock at the personnel
> manager's door. The assembly line foreman comes in and starts ranting
> about this new employee.  He says she's incredibly slow, and the whole
> line is backing up.  The foreman takes the personnel manager down to the
> factory floor to show him the problem.  Sure enough, Elmos are backed up
> all over the place.  At the end of the line is the new employee. She has a
> roll of the material used for the Elmos and a big bag of marbles.  They
> both watch as she cuts a little piece of fabric, wraps it around two
> marbles, and starts sewing the little package between Elmo's legs.   > The
> personnel manager starts laughing hysterically. After several minutes, he
> pulls himself together, walks over to the woman, and says, "I'm sorry, I
> guess you misunderstood me yesterday. Your job is to give Elmo two test
> tickles."
>


Using information pulled together by Jennifer and BAN, I requested West
Tradings Risk/Structuring Group do a more careful analysis of the
above-market costs associated with the DWR contracts.  Attached is their
analysis.

In this analysis we examined only the executed contracts and NOT the
agreements-in principle.  (Only executed contracts were released by the state
in the last few weeks.) Also, gas-indexed contracts were examined on their
nongas costs only.  Since gas costs are a pass through on some contracts, we
excluded them as a conservatism; i.e., we did not ascribe costs to the gas
portion of the contracts since they will float with market costs over time.
These contracts were marked to market using current, applicable curves.
Finally we discounted at the LIBOR rate, which is around 4%/year.

The stranded cost under these assumptions  is approximately $10 billion.  The
spreadsheet shows the overmarket costs by contract.  Note: a negative
"mark-to-market" equals a positive stranded cost.

As before, this analysis is based upon Enron's confidential forward curves.
Approval from Tim Belden is needed before this analysis can be released.

Alan Comnes


I sent it to Gerald last week - it is an electronic authorization form to transact on Kern's rapids system - need to return by 11/30.

Have a nice few days off and see you Monday.

SM

-----Original Message-----
From: Tycholiz, Barry
Sent: Wed 11/21/2001 9:18 AM
To: Miller, Stephanie
Cc:
Subject: RE: Anything happening today?

Not really...someone from Williams called you regarding a document that needs to be signed by the 30th.. is that a C/A for NWPipe....

She was covering for Jan, I did not get a chance to take the call, just heard about it...

BT

-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Stephanie
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:05 AM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: Anything happening today?


Can you do me a favor similar to Kam's previous request:  Can you add to my current profile all the books that Scott Palmer currently has calculation access to.  Could you also set Bruce Mills, Kristen Clause and Edward Brady up like Scott Palmer.  Additionally can you also set up Ashley Worthing like Anne Bike.  Thanks for you help and shout with any questions.
PL


Sally,
I am writing this article for the March issue of Shared Services Newsletter,
but I thought you might be interested in it. While you are not technically a
shared service, your group has many of the same attributes. The idea of
selling your services outside Enron may have crossed your mind as you look
at certain opportunities. Let me know what you think!
Thanks,

Mike Campbell
Holland & Davis, Inc
mcampbell@hdinc.com
713-877-8130

 <<>>

 - Outsourcing Your Shared Service Operations1.doc


Once again today I participated in the discussions on possible electricity
legislation held in the offices of Majority Whip Tom DeLay with other
interested parties including industry segments, public power and state
regulators.  The other congressional participants were staff to Reps. Steve
Largent and Chip Pickering.

After meeting all week (except Wednesday), the group was unable to reach an
agreement or even a provisional consensus on what could be placed in an
electricity title that could be added to the comprehensive energy package
that the House Energy and Commerce Committee will begin to process next
week.  Congressional staff will report to their bosses on the status of the
discussions as of this afternoon and from there the Members will determine
whether to proceed further.  There is a general perception that committee
leaders will elect NOT to take up electricty legislation at this time and in
the context of the broader package in the absence of broadly supported
legislation.

In the end, the discussions did not bear fruit because divisions remained
over the usual issues and along most of the usual fault lines.  As the drafts
progressed during the week, we succeeded in deleting the original language
that would have had Congress weigh into the bundled/unbundled and
federa/state jurisdictional rules at the very time that likely adverse action
in Congress could in turn adversely impact the Supreme Court case.

A last minute attempt was made by the congressional staff to stitch together
a minimalist electricity title that would have included reliability (with the
understanding that the NERC discussions could produce modifications more to
our liking), PUHCA repeal, PURPA reform, interconnection language and federal
siting.  However, in each instance there were one more politically relevant
interest groups not willing to go along.  Cong. DeLay's staff also tried to
link PUHCA repeal to those who had joined an RTO.

There was also an attempt to strip it down to reliability, interconnection
and siting (eminent domain) -- but again there was either disagreement on the
details or objection from those who favorite subject was left out of the
minimalist package.

There was one rather interesting discussion when the public power folks
floated language on market power that included a sentence that would have
made the filed rate doctrine inapplicable to antitrust challenges to market
rates.  Needless to say, I strongly objected as did EPSA and others.

As noted, the lack of an agreement reduces our exposure when the mark up
occurs.  In the absence of an electricity title, refund, price control and
other issues should not be germane to the package that the subcommittee will
take up on Tuesday and the full committee next Friday.  That package will
have five issues addressed: conservation, clean coal, hyrdo, nuclear and
reformulated gasoline.  Details to follow once legislative language is
released.


Richard, attached is a report on today's session of the deposition of Max
Holmes.? Steve
?

 <<depsum11.30>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - depsum11.30


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/16/2001 09:17 PM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	02/16/2001 05:34 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>,
"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 cc: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Tony Wetzel"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Steven Kelley"
<steven@iepa.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steve Iliff"
<siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Ross Ain" <rain@caithnessenergy.com>,
"Roger Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Robert Lamkin"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Randy
Hickok" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Paula Soos"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Marty
McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "Larrea, John" <John.g.Larrea@williams.com>, "kent
Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Ken Hoffman"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Kate Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "John Stout" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe
Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Jim Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jack
Hawks" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "Hap Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue"
<gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa" <fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Eric
Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "Eileen Koch" <eileenk@calpine.com>,
"Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "Doug
Fernley" <fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Dean Gosselin"
<dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "David Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Curt Hatton"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Craig Chancellor" <craigc@calpine.com>, "Cody
Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob Gates" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "Bob Escalante"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bill
Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill Carlson"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Joe Greco"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>
		 Subject: Legislative Status Report Week Ending 2/16

Date: 2/16/01
To: Jan Smutny-Jones, Steven Kelly, Katie Kaplan
Cc: IEP Board of Directors
From: Julee Malinowski-Ball, Edson + Modisette
RE: Legislative Status Report Week Ending 2/16

RECENT EVENTS:

-- The Governor,s press conference today provided no surprises. Davis
annouced the framework of a recovery plan for the IOUs that include the
purchase of their transmission system and a dedicated rate component, not a
rate increase, on consumers, electric bills to allow the utilities to make
payments to their creditors.  A transcript of the press conference will be
available later on the Goveronr,s web site.

--  As reported earlier this week, the Senate Energy Committee amended and
passed out SB 6x (Burton), which would establish and state power and
financing authority, and SB 33x (Burton) which would require the Governor,s
plan to purchase the IOU,s transmission to be approved first by the
Legislature.  Both measures were amended in the Senate Appropriations
committee and passed out the following day.

In response to Burton,s commitment to work with IEP on language limiting the
Authority,s eminent domain powers, IEP has drafted amendments which will be
presented to Burton staff next week.  At this point, however, I have no
confidence we will come to any resolution.  Sen. Morrow had a similar
commitment to fence-in the Authority,s &adequate reserve capacity8 role, but
has since given up due to any lack of progress and believes Burton does want
much more authority than merely ensuring reserve capacity.   Given the
likelihood IEP will not gets its amendment, although we will continue to
push for it on the Assembly side, we will need to reassess our position on
this measure.  Considering there doesn,t appear to be anything stopping
either of these bills from making it to the Governor,s desk, any opposition
efforts may be futile.

So much for the good news.

-- Siting:  IEP counsel Chris Ellison and I were able to spend a
considerable amount of time this week with Senator Sher,s staff to talk
about siting issues.  Generally, we believe the meetings went very well and
we were able to provide comment both on SB 28x and many other siting issues
not address in the bill.  E+M is still working on putting together an
official IEP package of siting proposals which should be ready for final
comment on Tuesday.  There is no indication when SB 28x will be heard.  The
Senate Energy Committee may have a hearing on Thursday next week but has not
decided for sure or what bills will be hears.  We will be anticipating that
siting is one of them.

-- QFs:  As reported by Steven Kelley this week, recent discussions with
Sen. Battin indicated that he is attempting to work with the Governor's
office on language that would, among other things, provide a linkage to the
"mega bill" and/or stronger language on payment for past due amounts. At
this point in time, the Governor's office has not responded to Battin's
request.  While the QF bill could begin moving at any time, pending the
Governor's action, it is increasingly likely that the QF legislation may not
go before the &mega8 bill.

 -- The Senate Energy committee also held an informational hearing this week
on the state,s audit of the CPUC,s audits of SCE and PG&E.  This is the link
to the State Auditor,s review:
http://www.senate.ca.gov/ftp/SEN/COMMITTEE/STANDING/ENERGY/_home/Audit.htm.
From my initial review it appears as if the State Auditor believes there
were several major issues not handled in the CPUC audits.  Surprised?

-- This week,s ECA committee hearing on interruptible programs was canceled.

-- The proposed ECA committee hearing next Tuesday to address Asm. Wright,s
repower bill, AB 36x, may also be cancelled.  E+M is currently researching
what permitted, current and proposed repower projects would be able to meet
the definition currently outlined in the bill.  If you have knowledge of any
of these projects and can assist with this research, please call me.  Wright
,s office is asking for specific examples to help justify the amendments we
are requesting..

-- McNally/Temple provided a report on this week,s energy briefing for the
Assembly Republican caucus which went very well.  According to M/T,s report,
members were appreciative of IEP taking the time to do this and several
members acknowledged that
they had never heard the message communicated in such a clear, concise way

--  Attached is the most recent legislative tracking report which includes
all the special session bills introduced to date.  The report is now 116
bill strong.  Please let me know if you need copies of any of these bills.

UPCOMING EVENTS (?):

-- Monday, February 19th is a holiday so the Legislature will be off, as
will I.

-- The Assembly Energy Costs and Availability Committee may have a hearing
on Tuesday to possibly hear AB 36x (Wright).

-- Senate Energy Committee may meet on Thursday to hear bills to be
announced.

--end--

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net

 - 2001 Tracking Report.doc


?

?
http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news/story/djbn/?story=/news/stories/dj/
20010420/BT20010420006533.htm&symbol=PCG
 - Quicken.com - News.url


I would like to acknowledge David Portz for his hard work and diligence in drafting and actively supporting the negotiation of the Green Mountain Power all-requirements transaction in ERCOT.   David worked long hours ensuring all tight timelines were met and facilitated quick contract turnarounds on numerous occasions.

In addition to Green Mountain, David has exhibited the same hard work and diligence on other Texas transactions (San Antonio, misc. QSE contracts, etc.)


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/20/99 12:52 PM
---------------------------

Leslie Hansen
12/20/99 11:15 AM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob
Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: F/U re European power trading by U.S. counterparties

I have spoken with Edmund Cooper to follow up regarding access to European
power products by U.S. counterparties.  Edmund and Justin Boyd have discussed
the issue and determined that they would like to follow an approach similar
to our approach for U.S. power products.  U.S. counterparties should be
granted read-only access to European power products.  If a specific U.S.
counterparty wants to trade European power products, the request for access
can be examined on a case-by-case basis.

Leslie


FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2000
03:46 PM ---------------------------
   Karen Street                02/08/2000 10:05 AM

To: Jeffrey R Golden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Timothy J Detmering/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Project Tim

There will be a meeting regarding Project Tim Wednesday, February 9th from
8:30am until 11:30am.  This meeting will be held in EB3321.


Was Jim asking questions about the number of employees in ENW who would remain with the Estate?

Summary looks good - our meeting with Mike Deville on 2002 budgets is scheduled for tomorrow.  --Sally

-----Original Message-----
From: Piper, Greg
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:19 PM
To: Fallon, Jim
Cc: McMahon, Jeffrey; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec; Detmering, Tim; Beck, Sally
Subject: Current ENW

A quick summary on where ENW is relative to NetCo and the Estate.

Some quick numbers first (all numbers are exclusive of the pipelines and Steve Hotte's group).

We will have about 117 employees remaining in the estate on the application side (Perlman) after about 100 go with NetCo.  We will have 121 employees remaining with the estate on the infrastructure side (Rub for now) after 60 go with NetCo.  We will have 9 on estate EOL IT (that will end up with the estate application group) after 40 go with NetCo.  We will have about 48 from EA operations (Hall) remaining with the estate after about 170 go with the NetCo.  We will have a few EOL operations people after about 40 go with NetCo.  We also have individuals remaining on the operations side for EGM and EIM under Kevin Sweeney.  We also have estate employees under Dayao with EES IT who have gas and power skills as well as EES operations people under Beth Apollo.  These numbers are all fluid and are not final as the NetCo deal and the people associated with it ebb and flow.  Currently, the estimate for ENW employees going to NetCo from all IT, operations and EOL operations is approximately 410.  Remaining in the estate to support non-pipeline IT and operations is approximately 453.

As we discussed this morning, we are trying to determine if the approximately 453 remaining ENW employees are the right number of people for the estate (EA, EGM, EIM, EBS, EES, Corp, etc.) for IT and operations as well as if they are the right people period.  We have draft org charts for estate infrastructure and estate application and are doing a skill set review of the employees in IT who are slated to stay with the estate but until NetCo is a done deal and the estate wholesale unit finalizes business plans, most of the IT estate people will be a pool of resources supporting both efforts.  Also, everyone in ENW knows which list they are on.

Also, we have spent money on additional hardware and a particular Unify license now (did it through Bowen and Weil as ordinary course) so that effective duplication of all wholesale applications can be completed hopefully by the end of January.  Therefore, the plan is to split ENW people out the day a NetCo deal gets done, split ownership of hardware the day a NetCo deal gets signed, agree that NetCo owns all the IP with all the Enron developed applications and they get a complete copy and the estate has a free license back in perpetuity and gets a copy of the same set of applications the day a deal gets done. We will get that duplication of all those applications done by the end of January (target date anyway). We will also begin a 6 month services agreement the day a deal gets signed.  Even though we will do the above, NetCo will still have their hardware and their applications sitting on that hardware initially in estate data centers (34 ECN, 9 ECS and Ardmore) and NetCo will also be on the estate network.  Hopefully NetCo will transition off those in that 6 months, hence the need for the services agreement.

We also submitted a 2002 cash budget to Corp. based on our estimate of remaining headcount, licenses, etc. but until we see what it is we are supporting, it is a placeholder.

Your thoughts on this?

Continue to include Sally in all your meetings if possible so she can coordinate the right support across your complete wholesale efforts going forward.

Thanks.

Greg Piper

  _____


Aren't you being a little rough on her on a problem that really doesn't make any difference to Dynegy?

-----Original Message-----
From: Saunders, James
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:34 PM
To: 'heather.l.mueck@us.andersen.com'
Cc: Hayslett, Rod; Chandler, Bob; roger.d.willard@us.andersen.com
Subject: RE: FW: "NNG 240" Acctg classification issue -update

i don't think a detailed cash flow request is relevant. with respect to my simple yes...ene and dyn have investment grade credit ratings, positive cash flows, and indirect backing by chevron and and as such have tapped liquidity to the tune of $billion. As such they have the ability.  parent dividend policy normally extinguishes intercompany notes, and that is why we have agreed to classify the amount as a contra equity, but the subscription agreement states that nng can not declare dividends that cause the intercompany note to fall below 240mm...i interpret that to mean that be that nng will have a long term intercompany note of 240... and perhaps its reasonable to reflect it a such on the balance sheet.

pehaps you could ck w your peers on the dynegy account and see if they agree with classifying the 240 has negative equity. if your peers agree with your classification of the 240 then i believe i have sufficient support to tell my dynegy peer the same

-----Original Message-----
From: heather.l.mueck@us.andersen.com
[mailto:heather.l.mueck@us.andersen.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:01 PM
To: Saunders, James
Cc: Hayslett, Rod; Chandler, Bob; roger.d.willard@us.andersen.com
Subject: RE: FW: "NNG 240" Acctg classification issue -update
Importance: High

A simple "yes" is not sufficient evidence.  I think this will be a very big
task, so you may want to put Enron Corp. Treasury on notice.  I want to see
where the money will come from that is not needed in other areas of Enron
to satisfy obligations of Enron as a whole.  This cannot include money from
NNG and TW operations, debt transactions, and Dynegy money sent to NNG.  If
this is the exercise, it may take more than 24 hours for treasury to
prepare and us to audit.

To:   Heather L. Mueck@ANDERSEN WO, Rod.Hayslett@enron.com
cc:   Bob.Chandler@enron.com, Roger D. Willard@ANDERSEN WO
Date: 11/15/2001 10:57 AM
From: James.Saunders@enron.com
Subject:  RE: FW: "NNG 240" Acctg classification issue -update

yes

-----Original Message-----
From: heather.l.mueck@us.andersen.com
[mailto:heather.l.mueck@us.andersen.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:40 AM
To: Hayslett, Rod; Saunders, James
Cc: Chandler, Bob; roger.d.willard@us.andersen.com
Subject: Re: FW: "NNG 240" Acctg classification issue -update

Bob gave me the subscription agreement this morning.

Our one question still remains - does Enron have the ability to pay
this?
In order to remain as an asset rather than contra-equity, can you
demonstrate that Enron has sufficient funds (other than NNG and TW
operations, debt transactions, and Dynegy money sent to NNG) to repay
the
$240 million to NNG if NNG were to call upon it.  If Enron doesn't, then
the $240 should be as a contra-equity account for GAAP purposes whether
or
not you have a subscription agreement.

Let me know when you have a minute.

Thanks,
Heather

---------------------- Forwarded by Heather L. Mueck on 11/15/2001 09:32
AM
---------------------------

To:   James.Saunders@enron.com
cc:
Date: 11/14/2001 01:48 PM
From: Heather L. Mueck, Houston, (713) 237 / 4995
Subject:  Re: FW: "NNG 240" Acctg classification issue -update

Is this somewhere in the merger agreement that we could see?  I think
the
issue for classifying it as equity is where would the funds come from.
I
know this is something Roger and Rod discussed.  Is there some other
source
of funds (other than NNG and TW operations, debt transactions, and
Dynegy
money) that we can point to as a source of funds that could be
distributed
to NNG if NNG called on it from Corp.?

To:   Heather L. Mueck@ANDERSEN WO
cc:
Date: 11/14/2001 01:13 PM
From: James.Saunders@enron.com
Subject:  FW: "NNG 240"   Acctg classification issue -update

fyi (i dropped an "a" from your name the first time i tried to send this

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Saunders, James
> Sent:   Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:14 AM
> To:     Chandler, Bob; 'hether.l.mueck@us.andersen'
> Cc:     Hayslett, Rod
> Subject:     FW: "NNG 240"   Acctg classification issue -update
> Importance:  High
>
> Rod indicated that (associated w the new nng debt) $240mm of the notes
> from parent will NOT be able to be extinguished via a dividend.
>
> That would suggest that perhaps the nng $390mm should in part ($240mm)
> be classified back in assets from its current classification as a
> contra equity amount.  (???)  <This is also Dynegy's unofficial
> position>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Saunders, James
> Sent:   Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:14 AM
> To:     Howard, Kevin A.; Hayslett, Rod
> Cc:     Chandler, Bob; 'heather.l.mueck@us.andersen.com'
> Subject:     "NNG 240"   Acctg classification issue
> Importance:  High
>
> I have had a couple conversations w Dynegy accounting personnel on nng
> financials and they ref a "$240mm note". (?)
> As it relates to the 9/30 nng interim financials,they believe note
> from parent amounts or a portion thereof, that andersen has requested
> we show as a reduction to equity be classified as a current asset.
>
> Rod, Kevin,  do you have more info on the $240mm that is being
> referenced?????

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality
Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.
If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver
this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and
kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or
your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as
neither
given nor endorsed by it.

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.


I have reviewed the Oneok Westex Transmission Agreement.  The only comment I
have is that the daily balance cashout requirements in Section F of the
General Terms and Conditions seem very burdensome.  This is really a business
call, but the 5% tolerance or cashout everyday might be difficult to
maintain.  I will leave that to you to decide Stacey.  I am OK with
everything else.


Dear all,

Following up with Vince's meeting on full requirement, we might just start
with the existing Psim model.
The attached spreadsheet  is still running !

You need to create a directory H:\projects\pwrsim before your run the model.
If you want to re-run the model,
you need to close the report because re-run causes the program re-write the
report.

Let us first review what is already there in the PSIM model, if we can live
with the simplistic dispatch
logic in PSIM, the PSIM is the deliverable product for the full requirement
deal.

Alex agrees to write an agenda for this project before the Friday meeting.

Zimin


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/25/2001 07:51 AM -----

	"Norman Plotkin" <nplotkin@rcsis.com>
	07/24/2001 06:28 PM

		 To: <arem@electric.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: legislative activity

All:
The word from the Assembly is that there will be amendments to SB 78, which
will be the vehicle addressing the Edison bailout, on Thursday, a hearing on
Friday and Floor Session to follow to ratify whatever comes out of
committee.  This word comes out of the Assembly energy committee (Joe Lyons)
and although Rick Simpson was with the Speaker all afternoon and didn't get
back to me, numerous other Members' offices confirmed that they have been
told to be in town and available Friday.

There is another working group, but I do not know who is on it, nor were we
invited.  I will continue to advocate for the language we were able to get
into 82, as should your individual lobbyists.

More later ...


Enron AVAYA (formally Lucent Technologies) PBX & VoiceMail Outage for Enron
Center South Conversion

Due to the outstanding efforts of our ENRON and AVAYA teams, we were able to
complete both Phase I and Phase II of the project this past weekend.  There
will be NO PHASE II TELEPHONE OUTAGE scheduled for this weekend.

Thank you for your cooperation.

==========================================================

Systems:
Enron Downtown Houston AVAYA Telephone & VoiceMail Systems

Affected Users:
All Enron Houston Downtown Telephone and VoiceMail Users

System Outage Duration: PHASE II
Enron Building, 500/600 Jefferson and Pennzoil April 6, 2001, 10:00PM - April
7, 2001, 4:00AM

Summary:

PHASE II  April 6, 2001

Enron Building, 500 Jefferson, 600 Jefferson and Pennzoil Enron telephone
systems, including ALL voicemail users, will be totally out of service
beginning Friday evening, April 6th.  The outage will begin at 10:00 PM on
Friday evening. The systems will be out of service until approximately 4:00
AM, Saturday morning, April 7th.


I second that--thanks a lot!!  DF

Martha Benner
05/19/2000 04:14 PM
To: Don Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Norm Ruiz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rod Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON (bcc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron)

Subject: Satellite Phone

Want to thank you so much for all your help in obtaining the satellite phone
for our usage.  It was a very short notice and you were able to come through
and with no hesitation on your parts.  It is so nice to have good people to
work with and you were so helpful and professional during the whole
situation.  I was a novice at this phone thing and you were helpful ever step
of the way.

Again, thank you.

Martha Benner


Dianne,

I didn't get my spreadsheet from Friday. No biggie I just used the average of
my buy and sell from stack manager in my model but I would like to have the
actual deals.

Thanx,

Chris


Joe Stepenovitch dropped: Mathis, Terance ATL WR
and acquired: McCardell, Keenan JAC WR

Natural Gas Gridiron Address:
http://fflnet.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/home/0205

Questions about this site?  Check out our FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)
at http://www.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/support_faq.html
or our detailed on-line help at
http://www.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/coach.html


We are pleased to announce a new sale for Winter travel that puts
every city in our system on sale for travel through March 14, 2001!!!!
This sale requires a 7-day advance purchase and discounts range up to
35% off the already low fares we offer everyday.  Seats are limited
and may be unavailable on some days and flights that operate during
peak and holiday travel times such as the Christmas, New Year, and
President's Day holiday periods.  You must purchase
http://www.airtran.com/reservations/cgi-bin/flight_search.cgi
tickets by December 7, 2000.

Receive a BONUS 5% discount if you make your sale fare booking online
at www.airtran.com  !!!!!!!

Remember:  Travel may originate in either city and all fares are
one-way and don't require a roundtrip purchase.

Following is just a small sample of one-way sale fares:

$80     Atlanta - Boston
$52     Atlanta - Dayton
$99     Atlanta - Grand Bahama Island, Bahamas
$65     Atlanta - Gulfport/Biloxi
$39     Atlanta - Myrtle Beach
$67     Atlanta - Philadelphia
$54     Atlanta - Pittsburgh
$59     Atlanta - Toledo, Ohio
$70     Atlanta - Washington, DC (Dulles)
$86     Bloomington/Normal - Orlando
$77     Boston - Memphis
$72     Boston - Raleigh/Durham
$88     Buffalo - New Orleans
$39     Chicago (Midway) - Minneapolis/St. Paul
$39     Chicago (Midway) - Pittsburgh
$88     Canton/Akron - Miami
$82     Dallas/Ft. Worth - Atlanta
$99     Dallas/Ft. Worth - Pittsburgh
$82     Flint - Greensboro/High Point/Winston/Salem
$64     Ft. Lauderdale - Philadelphia
$65     Ft. Myers - Atlanta
$82     Houston (Hobby) - Atlanta
$99     Houston (Hobby) - Buffalo
$87     Minneapolis - Atlanta
$75     Newark - Atlanta
$99     Newark - Houston (Hobby)
$72     Newport News/Williamsburg - Orlando
$39     New York (LaGuardia) - Pittsburgh
$72     New York (LaGuardia) - Savannah/Hilton Head
$64     Philadelphia - Orlando
$59     Philadelphia - Tampa
$72     Toledo - Orlando
$99     Washington, DC (Dulles) - Houston (Hobby)
$72     Washington, DC (Dulles) - Memphis
$72     Washington, DC (Dulles) - Tampa

Remember:  Travel may originate in either city listed above and all
fares are one-way and don't require a roundtrip purchase, and receive
a BONUS 5% discount if you make your sale fare booking online at
www.airtran.com  !!!!!!!

**********************************************************************

And now for the best deals on earth!!!! You know that you'll always
get a great deal on airfare from AirTran Airways, but did you know
that AirTran Airways has partnered with the Hertz Corporation to give
you special low rates on Hertz car rentals? To get these great rates,
click on the Hertz icon after you have completed your AirTran Airways
booking. You will be transferred to the Hertz website and the AirTran
discount will be automatically applied. AirTran Airways and Hertz --
making travel affordable.

**********************************************************************

You've got a great airfare from AirTran Airways! Now complete your
travel package with a low rate from the Hilton Family of Hotels!  Just
click on the following link, and check out Hilton "Family" Value Rates
at most AirTran Airways destinations!
www.hilton.com/specials/values_main.html

**********************************************************************

Sale Fares other rules and restrictions: All fares are one-way. All
fares are non-refundable, and a $50 per person fee applies to any
change made after purchase plus any applicable increase in airfare.
Travel on sale fares must be purchased no later than December 7, 2000.
All travel must be complete by March 14, 2001.  Fares have a 7-day
advance purchase restriction and may be combined with regular fares to
complete an itinerary.  Travel is not valid on December 22, 23, 26,
2000 or February 16, 19, 2001.  Travel also may not be available to
and from select cities during other periods of high passenger demand.
Seats are limited and subject to availability.  Fares don't include
segment taxes of up to $2.75 for each segment.  A segment is defined
as a takeoff and landing.  Airport passenger facility charges of up to
$12 are not included.  Fares to/from Grand Bahama Island do not
include $33.80 in round-trip taxes.

**********************************************************************
As a subscriber to AirTran Airways' Net Escapes, we send you regular
updates on our Internet specials.  If you need to contact us for any
other reason, please call us at 1-800-AIR-TRAN, or in Atlanta call
770-994-8258. Please note that any reference to Net Escapes fares,
Feature City fares, or bonus discounts for booking online may ONLY be
purchased on our web site, http://www.airtran.com.

Please click: http://post.intellimedia.com:80/UM/U.ASP?A35.86.529319 and
you will be removed immediately!

Or

To unsubscribe, mailto:U-A35.86.529319@post.intellimedia.com
or if the emailaddress is not clickable, simply copy the text
to the right of the 'mailto:' command and paste it into your
email application and hit send.  You will be taken off the list
immediately. Thank you!


Gerald,

If you need the CA drafted up, please contact Ed Hearn at x31592.  I can do
the conflicts check, but, in Kay's absence, he handles the actual drafting of
the agreement.

Thanks.

Dina K. Snow
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Dept.  EB3822
(713) 345-7099
dina.snow@enron.com


Nothing new - just a reminder - May 28 and June 4-7 - no downtime anticipated.

Gail Kettenbrink
Network Engineer
Enron NetWorks LLC
1400 Smith Street, #3426
Houston, Texas 77002
desk: 713-853-4524
cell: 713-515-4367
pager: 713-288-3208
email: gail.kettenbrink@enron.com <mailto:gail.kettenbrink@enron.com>
7132883208@page.metrocall.com <mailto:7132883208@page.metrocall.com>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Randy_Klug@enron.net@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Randy+5FKlug+40enron+2Enet+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, May 23, 2001 6:27 PM
To:	Randy_Klug@enron.net; Lisa_Hucke@enron.net
Subject:	EBS Maintenance Notification

Please note that all times are in Greenwich Mean Time (GMT).  Questions?  Call
the NOC at 800-267-7028.

AFTS/Fiber Transport:

   Service Affecting:

5/25/01 0400 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019229.  CM # 3423.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel in Dallas, TX to replace damaged fiber.  Circuit will be down
up to 15 minutes per ribbon.  No customer downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

5/26/01 0700 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019311.  CM # 3441.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel in Barstow, TX to replace faulty  reciever card.  Customer has
been notified.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

5/27/01 0705 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019336. CM # 3443.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel for fiber management on circuits in Los Angeles, CA.  Customer
will experience outage up to 15 minutes duration.  Customers will be notified.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

6/01/01 0400 to 1200 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019171.  CM # 3407.  Scheduled
maintenance EBS personnel in the Texas Triangle for a Road Move.  Customers have
been notified.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

   Non-Service Affecting:

   Completed:

5/21/01 1400 to 2200 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019277.  Scheduled maintenance by
EBS personnel to Install 2 OC48 cards in Washington, DC.  No downtime is
exptected.
STATUS:  COMPLETED

NETWORK:

   Service Affecting:

5/24/01 thru 5/25/01  2300 to 0600 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019246.  Global
Crossing # 3714.  Scheduled maintenance by Global Crossing personnel at Beloit,
KS.  for Bay Relocation.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

   Non-Service Affecting:

5/21/01 thru 5/23/01 2100-2600 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019288.  PGN # E1138-4.
Scheduled maintenance by PGN personnel in Miami FL, Adding paths to our DWDM
system.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  IN PROGRESS

5/22/01thru 5/29/01 1400 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019337.  CM # 3453.  Scheduled
maintenance by EBS personnel between Los Angeles, CA and Portland, OR.  Testing
through equipment and cross connects.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  IN PROGRESS

5/22/01thru 5/29/01 1400 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019338.  CM # 3455.  Scheduled
maintenance by EBS personnel between Los Angeles, CA and Portland, OR.  Testing
through equipment and cross connects.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  IN PROGRESS

5/23/01 thru 5/24/01 2200-0600 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019374.  PGN # E1137-3.
Scheduled maintenance by PGN Miami, FL.  To replace optic card at switch & data.
No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  IN PROGRESS

5/23/01 1400 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019320.  CM # 3448.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel to remove Sentry Remote Access/Power Manager.  No downtime is
expected.
STATUS:  IN PROGRESS

5/23/01  1700 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019341.  CM # 3458.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel in Las Vegas, NV to install card to connect via fiber jumpers.
No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  IN PROGRESS

5/24/01 thru 5/25/01 04000 to 0300 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019379.  Global
Crossing # 3833.  Scheduled maintenance by Global Crossing personnel in London,
CT.  Emergency maintenance replacing a RBA card.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

5/24/01 thru 6/02/01 1500 GMT.  EBS TT # NOCPDX000018909.  CM # 3324.  Scheduled
maintenance by EBS personnel between Boston, MA and New York City, NY to install
new DS3 for customer.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

5/25/01 2300-0500 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019364.  Scheduled maintenance by
Qwest personnel in Martinez, CA.  To splice stub cable to fibers in Martinez,
CA.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  PENDING

5/25/01  0005 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019342.  CM # 3459.  Scheduled maintenance
by EBS personnel between London, UK and New York, NY.  Unintrusive bridge and
roll to new trib.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

5/28/01 2230 to 2300 GMT.  EBS TT # NOCPDX000018764.  CM # 3282.  Scheduled
maintenance by EBS personnel in Portland, OR and Houston, TX to remove test
feature of Bandwidth trading.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

5/28/01  1400 to 1600 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019219.  CM # 3410.  Scheduled
maintenance by EBS personnel for Tokyo circuit needs to be rerouted thru an ODF
panel.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

6/02/01 thru 06/07/01 1100 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019366.  Level 3 # 257722.
Level 3 personnel in New York City, NY to splice a total of 40 fibers.  No
downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

6/03/01 thru 6/10/01 1000 to 1200 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019268.  Telehouse #
06032001.  Scheduled maintenance by Telehouse for Broadway Power.  No downtime
is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

06/04/01 thru 06/07/01 2300 to 0500 GMT.  EBS TT # NOCPDX000018735.  Global
Crossing # 3025.  Scheduled maintenance by Global Crossing personnel in
Cleveland, OH to replace section of cable due to bridge construction.  Switch
hits expected on OC3 between New York, NY to Chicago, IL and Houston, TX to
Washington DC.  No downtime is expected.
STATUS:  SCHEDULED

   Completed:

5/22/01 0701 to 0800 GMT.  EBS TT # ECTHOU000019325.  Global Crossing # 3376.
Scheduled maintenance by Global Crossing personnel between Houston, TX and Los
Angeles, CA. to groom and test fiber.   OC12 between Houston, TX and Los
Angeles, CA will take switch hits or experience short outage.
STATUS:  COMPLETED


I'll draft such a letter and send it to you and Kay for comments

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           05/18/2001 04:27 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Greg Krause/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Draft Letter Agreement between Midway Development Co and FPL re:
interconnection services

Why not simply provide them an authorization letter under our existing study
agreement that allows them to utilize the funds to conduct additional design
work?

Greg Krause@ENRON
05/18/2001 03:54 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Rose/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON@ECT, Raimund
Grube/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT
cc:
Subject: Draft Letter Agreement between Midway Development Co and FPL re:
interconection services

Please find attached a draft letter agreement from FPL.  I've taken the
liberty of making changes that I beleive may meet with the accounting
requirements de jour.  Basically we need to throw this letter away and start
over.  The balance of funds left over from the feasibility studies and
facility study for the Midway project is $122,000.  According to Dan Meyers
of FPL, this is about 2 months worth of work.

We can start negotiations on the interconnection agreement any time.  I'd
suggest we start now unless our prospective partner would want to be involved.


I also bought this already too - I'm trying to be more like Eldon!  Anyway -
what I really need is a new chef's knife made by Global.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Nancy Sellers
> Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 5:04 PM
> To:	'Eldon Sellers'; Cameron; Jeff Dasovich; Prentice @ Berkeley;
> Prentice Sellers; Scott Laughlin
> Subject:	Presents
>
> What I would like for my birthday is a cookbook by Paula Wolfert - "The
> Cooking of South-West France"
>
>
>
> Nancy
> (707) 251-4870 (phone)
> (707) 265-5446 (fax)
> "Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
>
>
>


<title>Untitled Document</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

If
 you do not wish to receive email from Bargain Bazaar, please Click Here:

 UNSUBSCRIBE

 Volume
 No. 2
 Sunday,
 October 21, 2001
 Price:
 FREE

 Dear PATRICE,

Click here to get a FREE
 copy of your Online
 Credit Report!

Plus, along with your FREE
 Credit Report,
 you'll receive OnlineCreditInfo.com Credit Monitoring
 Service - FREE
 for thirty days - with no obligation.

So sign up now to receive your FREE
 Personal Credit Report delivered online on our
 Secure and Confidential Web Site.


Please see attached file for key contacts during weeks of December 18,
December 25, & January 1.


Info Lunch, Chicago Graduate School of Business

Who:   	Interested Analysts
Where:  	Doubletree Hotel
Room:   	LaSalle B
When:  	Wednesday, Oct. 17th
Time:  		11:30 AM - 1:00 PM

Seating is limited - please rsvp to Constance Charles, x35614


Sarah:
Can you create a spreadsheet summarizing Enron's open futures interest broken
down by commodity and broker, including maintenance and initial margin for
all commodities (including rates, currencies, gas, crude, etc).
Also, can you create a list of all margin financing agreements in place and
the rates we pay.
Thanks,
John