Talked to John Fielder (SVP at the utility) this morning in an attempt to determine if Edison will come around and pay us the PX credit they owe us.

Summary of our offer:
Edison pays us 90% of what they owe us as of 01.17.01.
Payment structure: Edison pays us 10% immediately, with an agreed to (speedy) payment schedule for the remaining 90%.
In return, we drop our complaint against Edison at the PUC.
In return, we agree to a bottoms-up approach retroactive to March 1 to replace the current PX Credit/Residual CTC framework.

Fielder said that he didn't see any show-stoppers in our proposal, but had to check back on his end.  However, there were three additional issues that he wanted to add to any deal:
Some agreement regarding payment of Edison's undercollection (this would cover any of our DA customers who were bundled services customers pre-January 17). We agreed that this would only be an issue to the extent that the Legislature and/or the PUC agreed that Edison should get authority to recoup its undercollection in rates.
Some agreement on DWR stranded costs.  John expressed the view that DWR bought power under the assumption that the customers who've recently gone DA would be there to take the power, and now that they've left, they should contribute in some way to any stranded costs. I told John that this issue is a hornet's nest, that we were better off leaving it out, but we'd consider his proposals.
Some agreement on forebearance.  I told John that if Edison agrees to pay us, it didn't seem that forebearance would be off the table.

We agreed to touch base at the same time Wednesday morning.  The idea is that he'll get back to me with Edison's reaction to our proposal; and we'd get back to him on Edison's proposals.

Might be useful to determine whether we want to continue the discussions.  While John seemed very inclined to work something out, all signals are that the Legislature isn't inclinded to bail Edison out next week.  In which case, Edison could be in bankruptcy in a couple of weeks, which would presumably nullify any agreement we might reach with them. On the other hand, if the Legislature pulls a rabbit out of a hat, an agreement might have real value.

Any comments folks have on 1) Edison's proposals and 2) whether it makes sense to continue discussions on Wednesday are appreciated.  Seems that, at a minimum, if we agree to consider Edison's proposals, then our payment should go from 90 cents to 100 cents on the dollar.

Best,
Jeff


Start Date: 1/25/02; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012509.txt


Please print out.

Thanks,
   RT


Lou:
Here is the list of companies that have not called us yet to visit the sites.
Peakers: Aquila, Peco, Dynegy, PSEG
LV:   AES, AEP, NRG, Peco
Pastoria: AES, AEP, Dynegy, NRG

If you could call these companies and remind them that tomorrow is the last
day to sign up for site visits, I would appreciate it.
Ben


There are many different variations of the "ILOVEYOU" computer virus still
being reported.  The IT Infrastructure team is continually updating our virus
software as new versions become available, but it is extremely important that
you do not open any attachments that you do not regularly receive from
business associates.  Even business associates you are very familiar with
could be sending you the virus without knowing it, so unless you are
expecting an email from them with an specified attachment please do not open
it.  If you are unsure whether to open an attachment please do not open it.
Call your HelpDesk to ask any questions and to get verification if required.

We may need you to log out and log back in during the day as new anti virus
updates become available.  We appreciate your cooperation while we all work
to keep Enron's computing environment secure.

Please note the following Enron Policies regarding viruses:

Email

Malicious Code (Virus) Screening
In addition to the Enron requirement for email attachments (received and
sent) to be screened for malicious code (viruses, Trojan Horses, etc.), users
of Enron information resources are required to detach email attachments that
are received on to their hard drive for local virus screening purposes.

All executables (*.bat, *exe, *.com, *.vbs) files should never be launched
from email without first consulting with IT.

Virus Alerts
The Internet is constantly being flooded with information about computer
viruses and Trojan Horses. However, within among real virus notices are
computer virus hoaxes. While these hoaxes do not infect systems, they are
still time consuming and costly to handle. It only wastes bandwidth and
unnecessarily alarms other computer users.

Please, do not perpetuate unconfirmed warnings about viruses and Trojan
Horses. If you receive an invalidated warning, don't pass it to all your
friends, pass it to your IT computer security manager to validate first.

Enron
Information Risk Management
713-853-5536


The ClickAtHome team is pleased to announce that Pilot participants may now
order Internet service from MSN.  MSN offers DSL (Broadband) and Dial-up (56k
modem) nationwide.  To check the availability of service at your address,
view prices or to place your order, visit the ClickAtHome Pilot website at:
http://clickathomepilot.enron.com/    (the website must be launched through
Internet Explorer).

MSN's Broadband Satellite is expected to be available in mid 2001.  This
cutting edge 2-way satellite technology will provide broadband service to
most of the United States (excluding Alaska and Hawaii).

If you have problems launching the site, please copy and paste
http://clickathomepilot.enron.com directly into Internet Explorer.

ClickAtHome Team!


What's the word man?  I haven't heard a peep from you all day (even though I
know you've seen Ben and called Kori...I'm hurt)

sscott5


Jay has been pulling reports over the last couple of days and so far so good.  Reported attached if you need it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Webb, Jay
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:30 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Zipper, Andy
Subject:	customer positions

The enclosed spreadsheet shows the net online position by product, by counterparty, for a number of liquid gas products.  Each column represents the life-to-date position generated on that product, for that customer, through the date in the heading of the column.

I don't see an immediate indication of these customer closing out of positions.

If I can put this into a more convenient form, let me know what would help.

Thanks!
 -jay


Michelle:
I just wanted to confirm that you received our fax yesterday regarding the
stork bond application for our son Charles Eugene.  Please confirm when
convenient.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Sara and Marie,
Attached is the Executing Broker agreement with Monument and Credit Lyonnais for ECT Investments Inc.
Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions.
Thanks. Sheila

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jacqueline Tokley <jtokley@monumentderivatives.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Jacqueline+20Tokley+20+3Cjtokley+40monumentderivatives+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 10:58 AM
To:	Glover, Sheila
Subject:	Terms of Business

Further to our conversation we are pleased to attach an E Mail copy of the
Terms of Business in the name of the new entity.
Copies together with a covering letter will be forwarded to you shortly

Regards
Jacqui Tokley <<201543.doc>>  <<201544.doc>>
*************************************************************************
The information in this internet E-mail is confidential and is intended
solely for the addressee. Access, copying or re-use of information in it
by anyone else is unauthorized. Any views or opinions presented are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
Monument Derivatives or any of its affiliates. If you are not the
intended recipient please contact  postmaster@monumentderivatives.com
*************************************************************************

 - 201543.doc
 - 201544.doc


In order for UBS Warburg to timely process your paycheck, I am requesting that all employee's accepting offers return any outstanding forms to my new desk location at  05852 on the 5th floor of ECS (Look for the Hamburg Flag) by noon this Friday  2/01/02.  This will prevent any benefit deductions from having to be "Double Deducted" on future checks.  Please attach a deposit slip or voided check stub to your direct deposit form.  Attached below are the forms needed for payroll/benefits, in case you did not turn these in at Orientation.  Lastly, please verify that your EHRonline home address is showing your current home address because all live checks will be mailed to your home residence.

Thanks, Tony Jarrett
Benefits
Ext. 3- 7829


Kevin Presto is requesting that you attend a meeting regarding Organizing an Action Plan for the Start-up of Netco.

The meeting will be held in ECS 06716 at 9:30 am, Wednesday, January 2, 2002.

For Tim and Chris, could you please call 713-584-2067.  This is the telephone number in the conference room.

If you should have any questions, please call T Jae Black at 3-5800.

Thanks

Kim


Please see attached.
;
Michelle Lawless


I don't know if you got any of these while I was out.

DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
08:36 AM ---------------------------
From: Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/12/2001 09:03 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell
Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: Credit Report 3/12/01

Counterparty     TAGG#
Action
CMS Energy Corporation   qW3331.1 Rebook to CMS Marketing, Services and
Trading
Consolidated Edison Company of New York qW2007.1 Pending Jay Williams
Dynegy Energy Inc.    qW2360.1 Rebook to Dynegy Marketing & Trade
Engage Energy Canada LP   qW3304.1 Rebook from ENA to ECC (Under the ISDA)
 "     qW3303.1   "
FAMM Fuel and Marine Marketing   qW3046.3 Pending Brant Reves
Hunt Petroleum Corp    qW2337.1 Pending Russell Diamond
Jay Paper Sales, Inc.    qW3406.1 Pending Arpana Rajaram
Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Holdings  qW3036.1 Rebook to Louis Dreyfus Natural
Gas Corp
New Counterparty    qW1880.1 Pending Russell Diamond
Phibro (Asia) Pte Ltd.    qW3046.2 Rebook to Phibro Inc.
Seminole Transportation and Gathering  qW1864.6 Pending Jay Williams
Tubos de Acero de Mexico SA   qW0941.1 Pending Paul Radous


It looks good.  I would also like to see how supportive the two attached
letters are.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Chris Booth @ ENRON                           04/17/2001 03:49 PM

To: James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, James L
Bouillion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Insurance Claim Letter

Lady and Gents,

Please review and comment.

Chris


Per Greg Wolfe and Valarie Sabo:
Do not verbally confirm these deals. Greg Wolfe is preparing a confirm letter
himself. Sharen Cason was handling this account with Greg Wolfe, John
Malowney and Valarie Sabo yesteday, so she would have more detailed
information.

Let me know if that does it!

Thanks,
Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
12/12/2000 02:19 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deals #478944, 478945, 478946

Hi Kate,
We had a deal with Hinson Power Company, Inc. yesterday that we ended up not
confirming because the comments said that it was a buy-back of part of a
one-off deal and that Legal would prepare a special confirm.  There are no
comments entered for these deals that would indicate that they are the same
type of deal.  Are they?  Should we prepare a confirm letter?
Thanks!
Kim


Did you set up my Corporate.  account for me?  My mobile number is 7134080929.  Please transfer the balance from my personal to my corporate.

Thanks

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Martin:

My assistant, Jan Dobernecker, tells me that Sylvia Sauseda has arranged for
an office for you here on the 38th floor.  The room number is EB3850.  Sylvia
is in the process of arranging for a telephone and computer for your office
and will talk to HR about a badge.  HR should have the badge waiting for you
at the desk in the lobby when you arrive.  If it isn't and your HR person is
not available, just call Jan Dobernecker at x33427 and she will tell them to
let you in.  Sylvia will also attempt to find parking for you.  If you
haven't heard from her by Friday, I suggest you park in any of the uncovered
lots near the building on Monday morning.  They are more reasonably priced
than the garages (which sometimes charge $20 or more for a single day if you
don't have a contract).  We're looking forward to seeing you!

Have a good trip.

Mark

Martin Rosell
01/12/99 07:57 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Houston

Mark,

All systems ready to go on Friday morning.  I thus expect to be in the office
on Monday morning (18 Jan.).  Could you please ask one of the assistants to
help in organising and setting up a working station (computer and the rest of
the requisite gear).  Also, since it is a bit tricky to establish contact
with Houston H/R, this person could perhaps arrange a card/badge for me and a
car parking ticket (or advise me where to put the car on Monday morning).

I'm looking forward to seeing you and the rest of the Legal Dept on 18 Jan.

Martin


One of Travel Agency in the Park's major phone lines has been damaged due to
downtown construction.  The line is currently being repaired with an
estimated down time of approximately 4-6 more hours.  Calls are currently
being routed to 713-853-4801 and 713-345-5164.  We will send additional
notification if this problem persists.  We apologize for any inconvenience.


-----Original Message-----
From: Albrecht, Kristin
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 9:16 AM
To: Vinson, Donald Wayne; White, Stacey W.; Heffernan, Amy; Pearce,
Barry; Umbower, Denae; Miralles, Al; Stadler, Gary
Subject: FW: THIS is SO COOL!

-


I talked to Christian Yoder today.  He and Steve Hall will be talking
tomorrow morning about whether we should file anything at FERC.  I will be on
an airplane tomorrow morning so please let me know what we are doing.
Thanks.


Thanks for the resume.  I do not need a regulatory lawyer at this time.
Mark


Can you make this change and forward to  Phil?

C
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
04:12 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  ptuohy@wm.com                           12/12/2000 03:56 PM

To: mofriel@wm.com
cc: Chris.H.Foster@enron.com, wcarlson@wm.com
Subject: Waste Management Draft Swap

Please note the fixed price payor and the floating price payor are reversed in
this draft.  Enron will send us a corrected copy.
---------------------- Forwarded by Phil Tuohy on 12/12/2000 07:04 PM
---------------------------

From: Chris.H.Foster@enron.com on 12/04/2000 04:18 PM CST

To:   Phil Tuohy@WMI, George Woodward@WMI
cc:
Subject:  Waste Management Draft Swap

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000
02:17 PM ---------------------------

Melissa Ann Murphy
12/04/2000 02:16 PM

To:   Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Waste Management Draft Swap

(See attached file: waste management draft swap.doc)

Hi Chris,  Let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks,
Melissa
(713) 853-1886
(See attached file: waste management draft swap.doc)

 - waste management draft swap.doc


Kinda wish Kortney would have talked to me and cc'd me on this.  Does this happen much?  Don't know that I have a big problem with it, but it just seems like it isn't purely a Credit issue.

What do you think?

Kay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jafry, Rahil
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 4:34 PM
To:	Mann, Kay; Coulter, Kayne
Subject:	FW: Cogentrix
Importance:	High

FYI - from Kortney in credit.

Kayne,  with regards to Kortney's question about the interruptability of power, please let me know when you're free tomorrow AM, so we can discuss this with her.

Kay, what're the next steps from your end?

Thanks again,
Rahil
3-3206

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Kortney
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 4:26 PM
To:	Jafry, Rahil
Cc:	Ngo, Tracy; Radous, Paul
Subject:	RE: Cogentrix

Pursuant to the Cogentrix Eastern Carolina, LLC transaction described in this email and your later draft term sheet, credit has determined that an EEI does not need to be in place with the counterparty and that we would be able to transact under the long-confirm form.

To provide a little bit of explanation for you:

A Master EEI is preferable when the counterparty is planning on doing long-term, large volume transactions.  Therefore, we have very specific terms and conditions that do not have as much ambiguity as within the GTCs.

In terms of unit contingent or interruptible power - credit would like to get a clear definition of whether the cp is sleeving "unit contingent" power versus "interruptible" power, since there are varying degrees of risk inherent in the two separate transactions and we would like to gain an understanding of the term and type of power this will be.

Thanks Rahil.

Kortney

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jafry, Rahil
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:44 PM
To:	Brown, Kortney
Subject:	FW: Cogentrix
Importance:	High

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jafry, Rahil
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:16 AM
To:	Mann, Kay
Cc:	Coulter, Kayne
Subject:	RE: Cogentrix
Importance:	High

Kay,

Below are some answers to your questions re. Cogentrix.  Please let me know if you have any more.

- R

Power could be sold on a Day-Ahead or an Hourly basis.
They will give us a flat bogie and we will use that in our decision making.
Kenansville is a coal-fired, 30MW, plant.
We will be selling power at their bus point.  Any transmission cost, if/when incurred, will be treated on a pass-through basis.
The Min-Max decision on the number of MW's is their operational decision, and we will let them decide once we send them a draft of the revised contract.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mann, Kay
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 5:52 PM
To:	'Jafry, Rahil'
Subject:	RE: Cogentrix

Day ahead only?

How do we work together to set the bogie? I know on the MDEA deal there was an agreement on how it was calculated, including an agreement re the heat rates of the various units.

Is this a gas only facility?

How do we handle the transmission costs, or will we be selling the power at the same spot they are delivering it?

Are there minimum units of energy they will start their facility up for?

Thanks,

Kay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jafry, Rahil
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 5:39 PM
To:	Mann, Kay
Subject:	RE: Cogentrix

We'll be marketing power from their Kenansville plant on a unit contingent basis.  Together, we will establish a bogie price (their marginal cost of generation), and any value we can get them above this bogie price will earn us 25% of the extra upside we manage to get them.  They have a right to terminate with a 30-day notice and/or sell their power to other third parties at anytime.

- R

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mann, Kay
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 4:59 PM
To:	Jafry, Rahil
Subject:	Cogentrix

Getting warmer.  Could you send me an email with a brief description of how you see us marketing their energy.


I am out of the office until January 3.  If you need immediate attention, please email Sarah Zarkowsky or Anne Labbe.


Ryan,

Good to hear things are going well. I am still with Enron but I am in the
process of moving to Houston. I'm going down there to trade electricity so
that should be interesting change from nat gas. No wife. No house. No liver.
That's about it. Hope India was a good time.

Keep in touch!

Chris

Chris.Dorland@enron.com

(ps Any idea where Nav is?)


PartnersInWealth E-Mail

        Hi Mark -

        Good to hear from you. The marketing position has been filled, but thank
you for thinking of us.

        Let me know how we can be of help.

        James R. Waters, CFP

        PARTNERSINWEALTH
        3400 Bissonnet ? Suite 145
        Houston, TX 77005-2153
        713.964.4028 phone
        713.963.2977 fax
        jrw@partnersinwealth.com
        www.partnersinwealth.com


you cant go off of what coulon says.  that guy cant eat anything.


We can go ahead and prepare the termination letter, but it looks like Cheryl
has some issues to flush out before we officialy terminate that tower lease.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001 05:48 PM -----

	jdgriffith@aep.com
	03/29/2001 05:18 PM

		 To: Cheryl.Marshall@enron.com
		 cc: blinnehan@hanovermeasurement.com, Gerald.Nemec@enron.com,
jdgriffith@aep.com, Kevin.Dumas@enron.com, pjzawada@aep.com,
Randy.Hotz@enron.com, rterry@gw2w.com, Steve.HPL.Schneider@enron.com,
swilliams@aep.com, mdkyle@aep.com, sdketz@aep.com, pjzawada@aep.com
		 Subject: Re: AEP Communication Issue

Hello, Cheryl

I would like to better understand the issues before we make any decisions.
Can you please provide us with the details of this issue.  What is the call
sign of the HPL Licenses that we are talking about?  What type of equipment
are we talking about? (i.e. MW,  MAS, and/or Conventional Radio)  What
personnel or group is the equipment supporting?  What are the full list of
compliance issues on this?

Ryan Terry is with an external firm providing services to AEP and Enron in
assisting in filing of the necessary "Transfer of Control" Documents with
the FCC.   Depending on what the issues are Ryan and his firm may provide
counsel concerning this matter, but the decision to remedy these issues
and/or to cancel the license and remove the equipment will need to be made
by AEP, Enron and HPL personnel.

Bests Regards,
Jason D. Griffith
Manager, Wireless Engineering
614-223-1909 Tel

                    Cheryl.Marshall
                    @enron.com             To:     rterry@gw2w.com
                                           cc:     Kevin.Dumas@enron.com,
Steve.HPL.Schneider@enron.com,
                    03/29/01 04:21         Gerald.Nemec@enron.com,
Randy.Hotz@enron.com,
                    PM                     blinnehan@hanovermeasurement.com,
jdgriffith@aep.com, pjzawada@aep.com
                                           Subject:     AEP Communication
Issue

Hello, Ryan.  I got your e-mail address from Kevin Dumas.  I want to
discuss with you an issue we have at a tower lease site.  HPL is currently
leasing tower space from REB Communications in Gilmer, Texas.  Our
operator, HMS, discovered this week that the tower was not in compliance
with FCC regulations.  The most critical issue is that the tower lights do
not appear to be functional.  HMS has recommended that HPL remove it's
equipment from the tower and  cancel our FCC license immediately.

I would like to protect the interests of both HPL and AEP, and I would
appreciate your suggestion on what to do with the equipment licence.  I do
not want to do anything to jeopardize the closing of the HPL sale.  Please
call me at 713.853.6250, or e-mail me at cheryl.marshall@enron.com, so we
can discuss this issue.


can you take care of this...
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 08:26
PM ---------------------------

"Mark Sagel" <msagel@home.com> on 04/27/2001 10:14:42 AM
To: "John Arnold" <jarnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Advisory invoice

John:
?
Attached is the invoice covering the current  period.
?
Hope all is well. No changes on analysis.? Market will  have occasional
rallies (not significant) but all evidence shows lower levels to  be seen.?
Most bearish case shows decline until late May or first two weeks  of June.?
Prices from 420 - 380.
 - invoice enron 9943.doc


Probably agree.  I actually had lunch with this guy about six months ago regarding his developing a Credit Derivative business.  He does not seem to be very transactional focus which is what we need.

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Buy, Rick
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:40 PM
To: Bradford, William S.
Subject: FW: Resume

Bill- I don't think this guy makes sense for us although we did discuss getting some more senior people. If you  concur let me know and I'll get back to Carl. Tx Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: Tricoli, Carl
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:08 PM
To: Buy, Rick
Subject: FW: Resume

I worked with Frank at BofA  - one of best credit policy guys they had; was also in deal execution roles.  Contact Frank directly if you have an interest.  Thank you.

Carl Tricoli
VP
East Power
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Muscara [mailto:frankmuscara@carolina.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 12:39 PM
To: Tricoli, Carl
Subject: Resume

Thank you very much for your help.  My resume is attached.

Frank Muscara

704.905.9050
704.540.8954 (Home)
frankmuscara@carolina.rr.com

<<...>>


I thought there were 5 funds.  SS

	From:  Rod Nelson                           03/15/2000 03:39 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tudor Funds: Tudor Proprietary and Todor BVI Futures

I have agreed, after much discussion with both Bradford and Per, that in the
case of these two contracts only, we will agree to a collateral threshold of
$0 for both ENA and the counterparty.  In addition, I have agreed to a
rounding multiple of $250,000 and minimum transafer amount of $1.  Worksheet
is attached.


No support for Mexico.

Louise

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shapiro, Richard
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 8:22 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John
Subject:	FW: Mexico

Can you talk with Jaime and figure out a plan of support for Mexico (if we still need one)? You might also want to check with John and/or Louise.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Jaime
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:40 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Irvin, Steve
Subject:	RE: Mexico

Thanks Rick,  and let's talk after the holidays about a new game plan...Best regards and happy thanksgiving.

Jaime Williams.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shapiro, Richard
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:40 PM
To:	Williams, Jaime
Subject:	FW: Mexico

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hennemeyer, Paul
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:10 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	Mexico

Rick

Thanks for your encouraging words during the last few days. I have to say that despite all the difficulties we have had to endure over the past few months, Enron remains the best place I have ever worked.This is due, in no small part, to the great people I share this place with.

I also owe you an overdue e-mail on the Mexico matter. As I had indicated, I have decided not to take the offer. I have spoken to a number of friends and associates who live in Monterrey and their views are pretty unanimous: Monterrey is a great place to live if one is already settled with a family, but it is altogther different and more difficult for a  single man. Therefore, despite the professional opportunity to work with a great team, I have decided not accept the offer.

Many thanks for keeping me  in mind, being patient, and moving things along. I will be in touch in the next couple of days. Enjoy your holiday.

Best regards,
Paul


Yes.  I haven't heard from her.
Carol


As we discussed yesterday, here is the list of information that we need to gather to put into the booklets.  Please give us information (Chris, Keith, Susie, Susan and me) information as you get it.  The first priority is the rolls supporting the DPR information.  Also, please remember that all information needs to be reconciled to DPR information.  Please let Chris, Keith & myself know of your time frame to get us this info.  Currently, expectations are that we should have at least the rolls by the end of the week this week.

Thanks

Shona Wilson
Director, Global Risk Operations
X39123


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/17/2000
11:05 AM ---------------------------

Manuel Rensink <mrensink@riskcare.com> on 02/09/2000 05:01:51 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: London Meeting

Dear Vince

Could you let me know when you are able to meet RiskCare? I will try to
reach you in Houston, otherwise I will give Anjam's office a call
tomorrow.

Regards

Manuel

Manuel Rensink
RiskCare - Financial Technology Services
Piercy House
7 Copthall Avenue
London

http://www.riskcare.com

Tel:  +44 (0)20 7562 3400
Fax: +44 (0)20 7562 3401
---------------------------------------------------------------
About RiskCare

Since RiskCare's inception in 1994, we have specialised in providing
pre-eminent services and pioneering tools to the financial markets
industry.

RiskCare offers:

*  a range of hands-on technology services for systems implementation
and operation, including development, integration, support, technical
skills and software selection

*  a range of financial engineering services, including model
validation, risk advisory, analytics integration, development of pricing
models for derivative instruments and front office analytics such as
Willow, a revolutionary tool for option pricing


Please print this memo and attachment for me--I couldn't get it to print.
Thanks  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/06/2000
06:40 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dari Dornan                           01/06/2000 08:59 AM

To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mary Lou
Hamilton/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen
Peebles/ET&S/Enron@Enron, fkelly@gbmdc.com
cc:

Subject: Answe to GPM in ENA proceeding

Attached please find a draft response to GPM's comments in the ENA deal.
Please let me have your suggestions.  Thank you.  Dari


Suresh

For the next two weeks, I'd like you to focus on the following.

1. Development frame-work and getting Zach upto speed
 Specs for Syndication report & testing & production date
 Finalize questionnaire and production date
 Modifications to Invitee and User stats
2. EnronOnline auctions - structure, and hash out details to enable kick off
3. Legal frame-work , shorten contracts for both deal-rooms and auctions
4. Marketing materials for procurement - and leasing, mail to top 100 list.
5.Complete transfer of operations to Networks group (Sherri Thomas's group)
6. Budget changes
7. Finalize hiring needs for Q1 and Q2
8. Focus each of the marketing leads on revenue, client lists, outreach,
marketing and sales strategy
 Ross - procurement
 Don - Banks
 Toby - Data rooms
 Miguel - leases, legal and other data rooms
9. Dataroom development frame-work

Harry


I have never done a houseboating trip but they sound like a lot of fun. Was
the weather good? Houston was hot. Very hot. I better get used to it though
because I'm moving there. That is why I have been so crazy lately. I am going
down there to trade power in the North East. Pretty crazy shit. I gotta hop
but I'll write more later.

Chris


beside - stephen davis is better than terrell

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Davis

Stephen Davis and Cory Dillon for T.D. and Jerry Rice...

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           08/29/2000 07:50 AM

To: O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Davis

Garner and Glenn for T.D. ?


Dave:

Just for preparation - I'm on your schedule at 9:30 tomorrow morning.
Attached are the quick points I want to cover.

Jeff


You are right.  There are no delivery/scheduling obligations on the day ahead DART product (unlike the regular day-ahead).  Yes.  A DART onpeak would mean delivery on all onpeak hours for the corresponding day, and a DART offpeak would mean delivery on all offpeak hours for the corresponding day.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Puthigai, Savita
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:42 AM
To:	Crandall, Sean
Cc:	Meredith, Kevin
Subject:	FW: Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

Hi Sean,

I'm trying to understand the mechanics of this product. If I understand correctly the only difference between day ahead and the DART product is that it does not get scheduled for delivery until the delivery day. Also a DART trade for the 3rd would mean delivery for all peak hours on the 3rd?

Savita

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meredith, Kevin
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:31 PM
To:	Puthigai, Savita
Subject:	FW: Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

What are your thoughts on this?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crandall, Sean
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:29 PM
To:	Meredith, Kevin
Subject:	RE: Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

Kevin,

My apologies for not getting back sooner, but I sort of wanted to see how the Enron real-time products did before proceeding with this.  It seems like real-time is a success, so let's get going with this.

I call this product DART (Day-Ahead/Real-Time).  It's basically a physical product that is transacted on a day-ahead cash basis, but is delivered on real-time.  For example, on the day-ahead, lets say I post a "US Pwr Phy Firm  Mid-C Peak Oct04 to Oct05 DART"  $27 at $28.  If I get hit, then the party selling to me is obligated to deliver on Oct 5th, real-time 25 MW each hour.  I would be long real-time at $27.  If a party lifts my $28, then I would be obligated to deliver to them on Oct 5, real-time, 25 MW each hour.  I would be short at $28.

The mechanics of this deal are much like a regular day-ahead cash transaction.  The primary difference is we would have to flag these deals somehow such that they would not get mixed with our regular day-ahead transactions that needed to be prescheduled.

As far as the product language goes, I think if you add the following language to what you provided below, we should be OK (obviously subject to legal review).

"This product is intended to be transacted on a Day-Ahead basis, for delivery on a Real-Time basis.  Day Ahead means the trading day prior to the day of delivery, consistent with WSCC scheduling and trading practices.  Real-time means the actual Delivery Day.  Real-time deliveries shall be consistent with generally accepted WSCC scheduling timelines and practices."

Take a look, give me a call.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meredith, Kevin
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 10:12 AM
To:	Crandall, Sean
Subject:	RE: Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

Sean,

The language is below.  Also, Savita wanted to conference call you this afternoon to discuss this product.  What time is good for you?

Kevin

A US Power Transaction with Enron Power Marketing, Inc. under which the Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall purchase a quantity of firm energy equal to the Hourly Quantity at the Contract Price. The Contract Price shall be as submitted by the Counterparty via the Web Site.  "Firm energy" is power that is or will be scheduled as firm energy consistent with the most recent rules adopted by the Western Systems Coordinating Council for which the only excuses for failure to deliver or receive are if an interruption is (i) due to an Uncontrollable Force as provided in Section 10 of the WSPP Agreement; or (ii) where applicable, to meet Seller's public utility or statutory obligations to its customers.  Notwithstanding any other provision in the underlying agreement between the Seller and the Buyer that governs this transaction (the "Agreement"), if Seller exercises its right to interrupt to meet its public utility or statutory obligations, Seller shall be responsible for payment of damages for failure to deliver firm energy as provided in the applicable cover remedy section(s) of the Agreement.  "WSPP Agreement" means the Western System Power Pool Agreement as amended from time to time.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the Product description on the Website.
The transaction is for delivery or receipt of power at Mid Columbia.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be megawatt-hours (MWh) and the quantity shown shall be in MW's delivered in each applicable hour for the duration of the Transaction (the "Hourly Quantity').
The transaction is for on-peak ("Peak") hours on each Delivery Day beginning with the hour ending 0700 (6:00 am) and concluding with the hour ending 2200 (10:00 pm) Pacific Prevailing Time.  "Delivery Day" means a day during the term of the transaction that is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday or Saturday, excluding any day that is a NERC holiday.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crandall, Sean
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 12:07 PM
To:	Meredith, Kevin
Subject:	RE: Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

Kevin,

Could you e-mail me the contract language we currently have for the Mid-C physical product so I can work with it?  (I don't have an electronic copy).

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meredith, Kevin
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:33 AM
To:	Crandall, Sean
Subject:	RE: Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

I am the one to talk with about this new product.  I will call you today to discuss.

Kevin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crandall, Sean
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 6:43 PM
To:	Meredith, Kevin
Cc:	Belden, Tim; Scholtes, Diana; Alonso, Tom
Subject:	Day Ahead "Financial" Parking/Lending product

I've had an idea for a new EOL product that I would like to start our EOL legal and contracts people thinking about.  It's kind of a weird product, but I think it would trade quite a bit once people figured out what it was.

It's called the Day Ahead/Real-Time Park/Lend product.  Essentially it's a financial trade on a day ahead basis that is settled real time.  For example, let's say Morgan Stanley agrees to sell us 25 MW onpeak for $25, but that it is not prescheduled--it is to be settled real time.  If we fast forward to real-time, Morgan Stanley has two options.  They can buy from us on EOL, whereby this transaction books out, or they can deliver us physical power, whereby we have to sell the power to a third party real time.  The nice thing about this product is it provides any party the ability to take a position to real time, even if they are not a control area.  In addition, it would provide utilities and generators the ability to hedge a day-ahead position.

Kevin, I'm not sure if it's you I need to talk to about this, but I would appreciate some direction if it's somebody else.  Once we identify who we need to look at this, I'd like to set up a conference call to discuss contract language and EOL mechanics.

Thanks.


Bob -

there is an article on page five regarding California (RTC) prices and its
effect on generation market -

John
---------------------- Forwarded by John Massey/HOU/ECT on 08/24/2000 12:50
PM ---------------------------

Janel Guerrero@ENRON
08/24/2000 10:30 AM
To: John Massey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anna
Santucci/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Utility Environment Report Newsletter (pdf)

---------------------- Forwarded by Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron on 08/24/2000
11:29 AM ---------------------------

"platts.com" <mhenergy@prod-229a.tco3.web.wcom.net> on 08/23/2000 06:07:49 PM
To: janel.guerrero@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Utility Environment Report Newsletter (pdf)

Dear Subscriber,

Included with this e-mail is a PDF attachment of your newsletter
subscription.  To view the file, save it to your local file system and
open it with Adobe Acrobat or Acrobat Reader.  You can download the latest
version of Acrobat reader from the Adobe site at:

http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html

You can also get your newsletter subscription on our website at:

http://www.platts.com

Thank you,

Platts Energy Webmaster

 - current.pdf


Sorry I did not read the response rules.  I am in EES now - should I be on
this list anymore.
---------------------- Forwarded by Paige Grumulaitis/HOU/EES on 06/05/2001
08:39 PM ---------------------------

Mark Taylor (Vice President and General Counsel)@ENRON
06/05/2001 06:42 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: NYMEX Hedge Exemption List
cc:
Subject: PLEASE READ

To:        Department:   ENA Legal

From:  Mark Taylor     Date: May 11, 2001
  Vice President and General Counsel

Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any related
commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with another person
pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business on June 15, 2001
if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in
any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading affiliate
account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


I think it would be helpful if we met sometime soon to "take inventory" as to
our legal entity structures (thus far) for the Enron Net Works "family".
There has been a fair amount of entity formation (and, perhaps, commercial
activity) and I want to make sure the all entities and assets are where they
are suppose to be.

To that end, please contact my assistant, Darlene Forsyth (x3754) as to your
availability over the next week so we may take an hour or so to compare notes.
Thanks.

Jordan
---------------------- Forwarded by Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000 03:04
PM ---------------------------

Nora Dobin@ENRON
07/18/2000 10:56 AM
To: Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael K Patrick/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Harry Arora/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Brown/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brenda L
Funk/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: DealBench

As most of us have discussed, Harry Arora's group has been developing an
e-commerce site now known as DealBench.com (formerly EnronDirectFinance).
This site is being launched as an information dissemination/deal platform
whose closest competitor is Intralinks.  DealBench's customers will be banks,
law firms, and other businesses who desire a secure internet platform to
conduct business transactions online.  Customers will license use of the site
pursuant to written agreements.  Several trademark applications have been
filed by Enron Corp. for the site.  Lawyers from Vinson & Elkins in Austin
(Bob Baird and Dean Harvey) and Houston (Steve Borgman) have been assisting
us in various legal matters relating to the site.

At this point, the commercial team desires to move ahead with a limited
liability entity to own and operate the DealBench business.  Based upon input
from many of you, the proposal is to form a simple, single-member,
owner-managed Delaware limited liability company named DealBench L.L.C.  The
sole owner would be Enron Net Works LLC.  Upon formation, all assets and
liabilities of the DealBench business will be assigned to, and assumed by the
new LLC.  We understand that the private placement being contemplated by Net
Works will be through a separate legal entity and currently does not
contemplate the DealBench business.  We also understand that DealBench's
ownership by Net Works will not preclude future flexibility in DealBench's
ownership.

The commercial team desires to move forward with formation of DealBench
L.L.C. this week.  Based upon your input, we will proceed as outlined above.
If you have any other thoughts or suggestions, please let me know.  Thanks
for your help.

Regards, NJD


I will be there.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:09 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Cc:	Howard, Kevin A.
Subject:	FW: Cash Forecasting
Importance:	High

YOu need to attend this one.	Kevin:   you may also want to attend.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tauzier, Betty
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:06 PM
To:	Freeland, Clint; DeSpain, Tim; Grajewski, Joseph T.; Williams, David; Reeves, Leslie; Sweeney, Kevin; Price, Brent A.; Bruce, Michelle; Smith, Jeff E.; Hall, Bob M; Scott, Laura; Apollo, Beth; Whiting, Greg; Brackett, Debbie R.; Hodges, Georganne; Nelson, Kimberley; Choyce, Karen; Sommers, Jeffrey E.; Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Perkins, Mary; Garcia, Paul; Carter, Renee; Sczykutowicz, Marion
Subject:	Cash Forecasting
Importance:	High

A mandatory meeting requested by Ray Bowen has been scheduled for today at 2:00 PM in EB 2021 to discuss cash forecasting requirements.

We apologize for the short notice.

Thank you,

Betty Tauzier
Enron Corp Treasury
EB 2014
713-853-9817


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 12:02 PM ---------------------------

"SoRelle, Andrea L" <ASoRelle@h-s.com> on 05/01/2001 10:49:05 AM
To:	"'Amy Clemons'" <amy.clemons@enron.com>, "'Brad'" <bradf@inqueststaffing.com>, "'Elizabeth Bowen'" <Elizabeth_Bowen@AIMFUNDS.com>, "'Marcy'" <marcyrinehart@hotmail.com>, "'Meghan'" <meghanhaverland@hotmail.com>, "'Rachel'" <rachelarriola@yahoo.com>, "'Ritter, Robert H.'" <rhritter@utmb.edu>, "'SAM'" <missshy@texas.net>, "'Stephanie'" <Stephanie_E_Friedman@reliantenergy.com>, "'Tara Levinthal'" <tlevinthal@aol.com>, "'Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com'" <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>, "'temple_denison@nyc.yr.com'" <temple_denison@nyc.yr.com>, "'Caroline'" <carolinehead@hotmail.com>, "'Chad Wetmore'" <chad_wetmore@hotmail.com>, "'kara k'" <kklevenhagen@aol.com>, "Pechersky, Svetlana" <SPechersky@h-s.com>, "Cohlmeyer, Lisa M" <LCohlmeyer@h-s.com>
cc:

Subject:	FW: RV: Pull!

>From: "Maggie Beery" <m_beery@hotmail.com>
>To: aeh6375@hbu.edu, allisonspeed@hotmail.com, amy.clemons@enron.com,
>andrea_sorelle@hotmail.com, aria_brown@hotmail.com, battlecj@hotmail.com,
>Callie.Beery@kornferry.com, christina@gulfcoastentertainment.com,
>c_c_krebs@hotmail.com, christylederer@hotmail.com, cwunz@comscore.com,
>Derek_Davis@Dell.com, elizabethfenoglio@hotmail.com,
>emilycbrock@hotmail.com, Jill_Dalovisio@was.bm.com, jwunz@ncta.com,
>Kate.Delaney@lyondell.com, kawise@hotmail.com, kim.davidson@nbc.com,
>lyles65@hotmail.com, marcyrinehart@hotmail.com, mcgeeat@hotmail.com,
>me_levy@hotmail.com, mike.sewell@mail.house.gov, mmalone@loomissayles.com,
>mpincoffs@nada.org, nancy.c.hutcheson@bakerbotts.com,
>PDelaney@USChamber.com, rbeery@argohouston.com, rbeery@houstonisd.org,
>rencarey@aol.com, sarah.bass@gs.com, sneumeister@yahoo.com,
>BWare@rnchq.org, crosenth@central.uh.edu, ellie.bullard@mail.house.gov,
>janderson@rnchq.org, jsimons4@mindspring.com, kmcfall@ssk.com,
>mmcmullen@promarketdc.com, mollyradcliffe@hotmail.com
>Subject: Fwd: RV: Pull!
>Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 14:47:12
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

 - ATT195947.htm
 - squirrell.mpeg


Attached please find the Oct Govt Affairs report.  If you would like to discuss this, please let me know.

Thanks,

Jim


Deal details....

420529    432854    420554    420563
LTNW buys Grant Cty  LTNW sells Grant Cty  LTNW buys Grant Cty  LTNW sells
Grant Cty
N-01    K01-M01 & K06-M06  N-06    7/20/05
RTC    RTC    RTC    HE 1
50 MW    50 MW    50 MW    1 MW
MID-C    MID-C    MID-C    MID-C
zero price   zero price   zero price   annuity price - 470,000
    (annuity leg - price 570,000)
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 03/06/2001 11:42 AM
---------------------------
   Kate Symes                03/06/2001 08:34 AM

To: Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Confirm Letters - Grant County

I've got one more deal that Houston says they haven't received a signed
confirm letter for - 420529. Stephanie Piwetz says she spoke to Grant County
and they said they already sent out that one and 432854, but haven't received
them back from us......???? Do you know where they are?

Kate

(From 2/26/01)
Just something to keep in mind -
The confirms group in Houston is waiting on signed confirm letters from Grant
County for the following three deals -

432854
420554
420563

I've let Stephanie Piwetz and Sharen Cason know that you'll forward the
letters on to them once you receive them. Or you can give them to me and I'll
fax them over. Keep me posted on the progress.

Thanks,
Kate


i think i will wear a suit with a t-shirt like sonny crocket

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Morrill, Scott" <Scott.Morrill@Grubb-Ellis.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Morrill+2C+20Scott+22+20+3CScott+2EMorrill+40Grubb-Ellis+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, May 16, 2001 11:30 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE: Jen and Max!!!!

yeah you'd have to get some neon pink button ups and black pants

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 9:58 AM
To: Morrill, Scott
Subject: RE: Jen and Max!!!!

i just want to meet some models down there.  i don't hang out at discos
thought, but if i was in miami i guess i would.  i think i would need some
new clothes b/c all i wear is polos and khakis.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Morrill, Scott" <Scott.Morrill@Grubb-Ellis.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Morrill+2C+20Scott+22+20+3CScott+2EMorrill+40Grubb-Ell
is+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:56 AM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE: Jen and Max!!!!

   nobody speaks english, dirty, high crime rate.  We'll probably be at a
   resort though so it won't matter.  If you like the big discoteque dance
   clubs then it's your place, which I'll bet you do.  I'd rather lay back
   in
   the caymans, and I've never been there.  I'm getting old I think.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 9:39 AM
   To: Morrill, Scott
   Subject: RE: Jen and Max!!!!

   does miami suck?  i haven't ever been there.  i have been to caymans and
   they are awesome.  it is really laid back and very expensive.  either
   place
   will be fun, i just think miami  will be a better night life.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Morrill, Scott" <Scott.Morrill@Grubb-Ellis.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Morrill+2C+20Scott+22+20+3CScott+2EMorrill+40Grubb-Ell
   is+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:31 AM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE: Jen and Max!!!!

      I'd rather go to the caymans personally.  Miami sucks.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 8:58 AM
      To: Morrill, Scott
      Subject: RE: Jen and Max!!!!

      she called me.  she keeps in touch with me.  she spilled the beans on
      the
      plans to move the wedding.  i think if we went to cayman we would
   spend
      over a grand each.    miami will rock.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   "Morrill, Scott" <Scott.Morrill@Grubb-Ellis.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Morrill+2C+20Scott+22+20+3CScott+2EMorrill+40Grubb-Ell
      is+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

         Sent:   Wednesday, May 16, 2001 9:53 AM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE: Jen and Max!!!!

         are you still talking to your new years romance? who is this
   friend
      that
         you're getting the info from?

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
         Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 6:11 AM
         To: "Ryan Lee" <ralee@rmi.net>@ENRON; Peder Kjeseth ; merlinm
         Cc: Morrill, Scott
         Subject: RE: Jen and Max!!!!

         i heard they might move the wedding to miami

         >  -----Original Message-----
         > From:      "Ryan Lee" <ralee@rmi.net>@ENRON
         >

   [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Ryan+20Lee+22+20+3Cralee+40rmi+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@
         > ENRON.com]
         > Sent:      Tuesday, May 15, 2001 6:53 PM
         > To:   Lenhart, Matthew; Peder Kjeseth ; merlinm
         > Cc:   scott.morrill
         > Subject:   Re: Jen and Max!!!!
         >
         >
         > Did they just assume we can all afford this! I'm poor and
   stupid,
      I
         > don't know how I will do it!   Ryan
         > ----- Original Message -----
         > From:  Lenhart, Matthew << File:
   mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com
      >>
         > To: Peder Kjeseth  << File: mailto:pederleifkjeseth@hotmail.com
   >>
      ;
         > ralee << File: mailto:ralee@rmi.net >>  ; merlinm << File:
         > mailto:merlinm@uswest.net >>  ; Lenhart, Matthew << File:
         > mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com >>
         > Cc: scott.morrill << File: mailto:scott.morrill@grubb-ellis.com
   >>
         > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 3:35 PM
         > Subject: RE: Jen and Max!!!!
         > i just looked at the prices for flights to cayman and they run
      around
         > $600.  this is going to cost over $1000.  start saving  now.
         > >  -----Original Message-----
         > > From: Peder  Kjeseth  [mailto:pederleifkjeseth@hotmail.com <<
      File:
         > mailto:pederleifkjeseth@hotmail.com >> ]
         > > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 6:14 PM
         > > To: ralee; merlinm;  Matthew.Lenhart
         > > Cc: scott.morrill
         > > Subject: Re: Jen and  Max!!!!
         > >
         > >
         > > I think we should dig up that slip that Matt  Hersh gave to
   Max
         > saying
         > > that
         > > he might have been exposed to an  STD and then get the photo
   of
      his
         > > cock in a
         > > doughnut to  complete the circle.  Has anyone fwded that mail
   to
         > Coco?
         > >  I'm
         > > sure she has a couple fond memories for the two of them to
   savor
         > > throughout
         > > their marrige.
         > >
         > > -PLK
         > >
         > >
         > > >From: "Ryan Lee" <ralee@rmi.net << File: mailto:ralee@rmi.net
   >>
      >
         > > >To: <merlinm@uswest.net << File: mailto:merlinm@uswest.net >>
   >,
         > <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File:
      mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
         > >> >
         > >  >CC: <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File:
         > mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >> >,
      <pederleifkjeseth@hotmail.com
         > << File: mailto:pederleifkjeseth@hotmail.com >> >,
         > >  ><scott.morrill@grubb-ellis.com << File:
         > mailto:scott.morrill@grubb-ellis.com >> >
         > >  >Subject: Re: Jen and Max!!!!
         > > >Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 12:55:06  -0600
         > > >
         > > >What is this book thing. I will crack skulls!  I'll wipe a
      booger
         > on
         > > the
         > > >first page. Then I'll sign it  "REMO"!
         > > >
         > > >----- Original Message -----
         > >  >From: <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File:
         > mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >> >
         > >  >To: <merlinm@uswest.net << File: mailto:merlinm@uswest.net
   >> >
         > > >Cc:  <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com << File:
         > mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com >> >;
      <pederleifkjeseth@hotmail.com
         > << File: mailto:pederleifkjeseth@hotmail.com >> >;
         > >  ><ralee@rmi.net << File: mailto:ralee@rmi.net >> >;
         > <scott.morrill@grubb-ellis.com << File:
         > mailto:scott.morrill@grubb-ellis.com >> >
         > >  >Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:27 AM
         > > >Subject: Re: Jen and  Max!!!!
         > > >
         > > >
         > > > >
         > > > > i think  she is one of jen's cougar friends.  that is such
   a
         > chick
         > >  thing
         > > >to
         > > > > do.
         > > > >
         > >  >
         > >
         > >
      _________________________________________________________________
         > > Get  your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
      http://explorer.msn.com
         > << File: http://explorer.msn.com >>
         > >
         >


EES also has an agreement with TradeSpark.  Let me know if you need more information.

Will

From:	Mark Greenberg/ENRON@enronXgate on 11/19/2001 11:28 AM
To:	Joanne Rozycki/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Jeffrey T Hodge/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate, William Frederking/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	RE: Tradesbark

Joanne -

I believe Pat was inquiring as to TradeSpark.  We have agreements with ENA and EPMI that were signed earlier this year.  I believe we also have one with EES, but this was negotiated by Will F.  We would have to check with him about the status.

Let me know what needs to be done on this matter.

Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rozycki, Joanne
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 10:34 AM
To:	Greenberg, Mark
Cc:	Griffin, Vanessa
Subject:	Tradesbark

Pat Kokes, a Contract Administrator with Dynegy at (713) 507-3726, called this morning, requesting info on Electronic Trading Agreements with Tradesbark for Enron Capital, Enron Energy Services, Enron Global Mktg & Enron Power Mktg.  Jeff Hodge said you would probably be the one to refer this to.  If possible, please give Mr. Kokes a call back today.
Thanks.

Joanne Rozycki
Senior Administrative Assistant
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3880D
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-5968     Fax:      (713) 646-3490
Email:   joanne.rozycki@enron.com


The report named: West VaR <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=36&report_name=West+VaR&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/19/2001>, published as of 11/19/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Stuart,

If you need a copy of the executed Westinghouse letter, you can find the
original on my desk, I believe on the left hand corner (looking out).  The
letter we are waiting for is merely an acknowledgement that LJM doesn't need
to sign.  I think getting the letter is probably belts and suspenders, but I
requested it anyway.

Kay


by this ratio the rest ot the power group is really underperforming!!!!

From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/05/2001 10:22 AM
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: May position : sold !!!!!

This 250K came from about 3 MW.
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Collonges, Remi
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 4:03 PM
To: Kishkill, Joe; Gonzalez, Orlando; Lavorato, John
Subject: Re: May position : sold !!!!!

We tried all day to sell this volume below.  Market is extremely illiquid,
given Annex V uncertainty and other regulatory issues: generators believe
Parente will help them out in May, while LDCs look at their contracts and
reduced demand.  However AES Sul accepted to buy this volume at 25% discount
to May spot price, payment on June 25th.  We will net about R$600,000
(US$250,000) between sale and purchase prices.  Credit is OK.

We will keep a very small, long position at MAE settlement for May.

Remi

Luis Berti
06/04/2001 05:39 PM
To: Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, David M Rosenberg/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo
Lisboa/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo Sassatani/SA/Enron@Enron, Luis
Henriques/SA/Enron@Enron, Moacyr Carmo/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: May position : sold !!!!!

This is to inform that we have closed 2.200 MWh for May to AES Sul at 25%
discount rate against spot price at southeast sub-market to be paid on Jun
25th.

Berti


Jen - don't feel bad.  I am THAT person too.  I have a final on Tues the
12th till 10PM, but it is one of those that does require any studying, so
Monday may work for me.  I may have my other final on Monday, but it is
would be done b/t 7:30 and 8:00.

Happy Thanksgiving!!!!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jennifer Bowles [SMTP:jkbowles@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21,2000 3:32 PM
> To: merharp@hotmail.com; Sarahberry819@yahoo.com;
> Lisa.A.Meador@chase.com; ashleastu@aol.com;
> julianna.grisham@halliburton.com; sscott5@enron.com;
> sarah_c_buck@hotmail.com; rebeccacooke@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: A Christmas Tasters
>
> Hello everyone!  I would love to have dinner and exchange gifts.... I
> talked
> to Lisa last night and I am volunteering at the MFA on Tuesday, December
> the
> 12th... I was wondering if we could have it on Monday the 11th???  We
> could
> start our week fresh!  :o)
>
> Let me know if this works for your schedules... I'm sorry for being THAT
> person...
>
> Hope everyone's doign well and.... Happy Thanksgiving!!!
>
> Love,
>
> Jen
>
>
> >From: <Lisa.A.Meador@chase.com>
> >To: jkbowles@hotmail.com, ashleastu@aol.com,
> >julianna.grisham@halliburton.com,        sscott5@enron.com,
> >sarah_c_buck@hotmail.com, rebeccacooke@hotmail.com
> >Subject: A Christmas Tasters
> >Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 14:55:23 -0600
> >
> >
> >
> >Hey guys!
> >
> >It is that time of year when everything gets SO crazy, so I am
> >thinking.........
> >we need to plan our Taster's Finale ahead of time so we can all mark our
> >calendars and so we can find a place!
> >
> >Here are some thoughts:  we could do a boy/girl Taster's where we all
> >invite
> >some of our friends, guys and girls to join us and we rent out a room at
> a
> >restaurant.  Or we could have just girls and have a really nice Christmas
> >celebration at a cool restaurant and do "Secret Santa".  Either way, it
> >would be
> >a blast.
> >
> >How does Thursday, Dec 14th sound?
> >
> >So, here is what I need:  your vote on............... the type of party,
> >then
> >what restaurant that goes with that idea, then affirmation of the date.
> >
> >Get excited girls!  This is going to be fun!
> >
> >Love you guys,
> >Lisa
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> ___________
> Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download :
> http://explorer.msn.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Black, Legale
Sent:	Saturday, September 22, 2001 12:06 PM
To:	Medeles, Gerry
Cc:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	RE: Questions on MDQ
Importance:	High

Gerry/Lynn:

Yes, the volume nominated to the inlet/from the outlet is factored into a firm contracts MDQ total.

At a high-level,  there should be no special MDQ-related coding at Bushton inlet/outlet that causes an override (per se) of a contract's MDQ allowing shippers to "double" their contract MDQ.

I did a preliminary check (using model office) to confirm coding logic at the nomination level......looking at K#6425 (BP Energy) that has a total contract MDQ of 20,835 MMbtu.   When nominating above the 20,835 K# MDQ; you can only nominate to inlet/from outlet up to the contract's MDQ utilizing transaction type 01 (current business).  Any additional vols. nominated above the contract MDQ must then be nominated as transaction type 02 (overrun).

We do have shippers that nom in to & out of the plant on the same contract... .....initial research indicated there are contracts that are identical on the inlet and outlet of Bushton; i.e., same contract nominating to inlet is the same contract picking up the gas at the outlet.    The IT Group ; however, could run a quick report to check/confirm this.

Hope I answered your questions......

Legale

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Medeles, Gerry
Sent:	Saturday, September 22, 2001 8:17 AM
To:	Black, Legale
Cc:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	FW: Questions on MDQ
Importance:	High

Legale can you follow up on this item, I am not sure about this.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 5:30 PM
To:	Buchanan, John; Medeles, Gerry; Kowalke, Terry
Cc:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	FW: Questions on MDQ

	Is the volume at the inlet and outlet of Bushton factored into any MDQ total?  Gerry
	if you are not the person to help us on this, please let me know who.  Also in talking
	with Mary Darveaux she said if you use the same contract at the inlet and outlet of
	Bushton, you DO double your MDQ.  Therefore, if you have 10,000 MDQ you can
	only nominate 5,000 to inlet and 5,000 at outlet.

	Gerry, can we run a quick report to see if there are any contracts that are identical
	on the inlet and outlet of Bushton?   If she is right, then we have NOT had anyone
	nominate on the same contract.  If I have confused you, let's discuss.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Paladino, Ranelle
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 4:49 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Pritchard, John; Winckowski, Michele
Cc:	Kowalke, Terry; Buchanan, John; Darveaux, Mary
Subject:	RE: Questions on MDQ

So when a shipper is required (because of the producer's processing rights) to nominate from their primary receipt point to Bushton Inlet and then from the Bushton Outlet to Demarc, is that treated as one nomination from a receipt to a delivery OR is that treated as two nominations on the same contract with one receipt at their primary receipt point and another receipt at the Bushton Outlet thus exceeding the contract MDQ sending the shipper into overrun (assuming the shipper was nominating the entire MDQ throughout the path)?

Didn't we also have a situation where shippers were going from a receipt point to Demarc and not going through Bushton when they were supposed to--or maybe it was that shippers were going from Bushton Outlet to Demarc and not getting charged fuel when they weren't supposed to be able to do that transaction--I just remember something happening not too long ago.

Thanks for the help with these questions.
Ranelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 4:41 PM
To:	Pritchard, John; Paladino, Ranelle; Winckowski, Michele
Cc:	Kowalke, Terry; Buchanan, John; Blair, Lynn; Darveaux, Mary
Subject:	Questions on MDQ

	Ranelle, John and Michelle,  thought I would send this statement to you and see if this
	helps simplify our answer to your question.

	The question is:  How is MDQ used in the nomination system to ensure we do not
	double up on MDQ volumes when we have split paths (i.e. nom on same contract
	from (1) Mid 15 to Bushton Inlet and from (2) Bushton Outlet to Demac)

	For Nominating purposes:

	MDQ of contract = Primary Firm + Alternate Firm up to the MDQ.
	Anything over the MDQ will be Overrun and charged at the IT rate.

	Point MDQ needs to be considered when allocating a receipt point.

	EXAMPLE:

	If the Field MDQ is 10,000, then we will  (1) total the reciepts nominated on the
	contract; (2) compare the total nominated to the Contract MDQ.  Then the shipper
	will get firm (primary and alternate) up to their contract MDQ.  Anything over will be
	overrun at IT rate.

	If anyone has any other questions, please let me know.  Thanks. Lynn


yes, I will attend.


Attached please find the edited deregulation speech.

 <<anti regulation speech.doc>>

 - anti regulation speech.doc


Brian here it is.   Thanks - bob 713-853-3180


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/12/2000
03:51 PM ---------------------------

ccalger@enron.com on 11/12/2000 01:11:08 PM
To: ddelain2@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Approval for reviewer

CALGER,CHRISTOPHER F   has suggested reviewers and submitted them for your
approval.  You may review/modify this list of reviewers by logging on to PEP
at http://pep.corp.enron.com  and going to Supervisor Services.  Please
remember, no feedback can be completed on CALGER,CHRISTOPHER F   until you
have approved the list.


11:30:57 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Sanders, Richard B.'
11:30:57 Synchronizing Hierarchy
11:30:57 Synchronizing Favorites
11:30:57 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
11:30:58 	   1 item(s) added to offline folder
11:30:58 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
11:30:58 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
11:30:59 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
11:30:59 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
11:30:59 	   1 view(s)/form(s) updated in offline folder
11:30:59 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
11:30:59 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
11:30:59 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
11:30:59 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
11:31:00 Synchronizing Views
11:31:00 Synchronizing Forms
11:31:00 Done


RIGZONE DAILY NEWS -- TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2002
------------------------------------------------------------
Daily News from the worldwide upstream oil & gas industry
   to view the complete version, please go to:
   http://www.rigzone.com/newsletter_show.asp?n_id=205
------------------------------------------------------------


This meeting takes place in EB2831.

Thank you
---------------------- Forwarded by Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 10:58
AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey C Gossett
12/07/2000 10:24 AM
To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 8:30 Meeting on systems

There is a 30 minute meeting every morning on the 28th floor at 8:30 about
systems issues from the prior night and to discuss what books were not
officialized.  I have gone to this meeting this week, and I think that we
should always have a representative in the meeting.  Here is what I propose:
We alternate weeks going to this meeting.

Week of :
Dec. 4   - Jeff Gossett
Dec. 11 - Darron Giron
Dec. 18 - David Baumbach
Dec. 25 - Will Kelly
Jan. 1    -  Kam Keiser
Jan. 8    - Errol Mclaughlin

And then we will start over again.
If you can not go,  make sure that someone goes in your place.

Thanks

Irena and Elizabeth -  Can you please add these daily meetings to the
appropriate calender?

Thanks


Shirley,

Please, give them the details that are included in a standard   bio plus
E-mail,
phone number etc.

Vince

Cindy Derecskey@ENRON
07/18/2000 12:06 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PR Department

Vince, I received this inquiry about you.  I am forwarding it to you so you
can respond to it or politely tell them your not interested.

---------------------- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 07/18/2000
12:03 PM ---------------------------

"alex.bandini" <alex.bandini@petroleum-economics.com> on 07/18/2000 11:10:23
AM
Please respond to <alex.bandini@petroleum-economics.com>
To: <public-relations@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing on behalf of Petroleum Economics Ltd, an energy consultancy
firm based in London. We are currently updating our lists of contact
addresses, and I would be most grateful if you could pass on contact details
for Mr Vince Kaminski, your Head of Quantitative Research.

Yours Faithfully

Alex Bandini

_________________________________________

Alex Bandini

Petroleum Economics Limited
Tel: +44 (0)20-7553-2000
Fax: +44 (0)20-7553-2001
E-mail: alex.bandini@petroleum-economics.com
http://www.petroleum-economics.com


Here are the deal numbers, with correct counterparty names and MW hours. I
changed deal 467455 and added one new forward:

467455
10 MW
175.00
Palo Verde
Southern Company Energy Marketing

469098
50 MW
175.00
Palo Verde
Sempra Energy Marketing

Please let me know if there are anymore questions.

Thanks,
Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
11/29/2000 07:02 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal #467455 New Counterparty

Hi Kate,
Just checking on this deal.  Is this gonna be an exchange for physical and
the counterparty name will be added later?  It's been "new" for a couple of
days now, which is fine, I just wanted to make sure someone is working on it.
Thanks,
Kim


Hi guys - this is good.

Those who did not exchange mail with me within the last 2-3 months please
reply because my address has changed.

Thanks,

Zoltan

> The Americans and Russians at the height of the arms race
>
> realized that if they continued in the usual manner they
>
> were going to blow up the whole world.
>
>
>
> One day they sat down and decided to settle the whole
>
> dispute with one dog fight. They would have five years to
>
> breed the best fighting dog in the world and which ever
>
> side's dog won would be entitled to dominate the world. The
>
> losing side would have to lay down its arms.
>
>
>
> The Russians found the biggest meanest Doberman and
>
> Rottweiler females in the world and bred them with the
>
> biggest meanest Siberian wolves. They selected only the
>
> biggest and strongest puppy from each litter, killed his
>
> siblings, and gave him all the milk. They used steroids and
>
> trainers and after five years came up with the biggest
>
> meanest dog the world had ever seen. Its cage needed steel
>
> bars that were five inches thick and nobody could get near it.
>
>
>
> When the day came for the dog fight, the Americans showed up
>
> with a strange animal. It was a nine foot long Dachshund.
>
> Everyone felt sorry for the Americans because they knew
>
> there was no way that this dog could possibly last ten
>
> seconds with the Russian dog.
>
>
>
> When the cages were opened up, the Dachshund came out of
>
> it's cage and slowly waddled over towards the Russian dog.
>
> The Russian dog snarled and leaped out of it's cage and
>
> charged the American dachshund. But, when it got close
>
> enough to bite the Dachshund's neck, the Dachshund opened
>
> it's mouth and consumed the Russian dog in one bite. There
>
> was nothing left at all of the Russian dog.
>
>
>
> The Russians came up to the Americans shaking their heads in
>
> disbelief. "We don't understand how this could have
>
> happened. We had our best people working for five years with
>
> the meanest Doberman and Rottweiler females in the world and
>
> the biggest meanest Siberian wolves."
>
>
>
> "That's nothing", an American replied. "We had our best
>
> plastic surgeons working for five years to make an alligator
>
> look like a Dachshund.


Bob,

Thanks.

Vince

Robert Hermann@ENRON
01/11/2000 02:19 PM
Sent by: Bobbie Moody@ENRON
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CONGRATULATIONS!

Vince,

Congratulations on your promotion to Managing Director.

Best wishes for your continued success.

Bob


he went home already.  we went to dinner mon & tues.  i am just going to
chill this week and party on saturday, maybe even friday a little.  are you
going out tomorrow?


I have seen this, but I don't think it should go out.

David/Mary/Cindy, please correct me if I'm wrong.

Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Prihoda, Melissa
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	FW: Q&A
Importance:	High
Sensitivity:	Confidential

Michelle,
Have you had a chance to look at this?  Is it okay for us to send to the HR VPs and Generalists for them to forward to their client groups?
Thanks,
Melissa Prihoda
Organizational Development & Learning
713.345.2501
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	O'rourke, Tim
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 5:13 PM
To:	Wilbeck, Tom; Prihoda, Melissa
Subject:	FW: Q&A
Importance:	High
Sensitivity:	Confidential

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 3:32 PM
To:	O'rourke, Tim
Cc:	Clark, Mary; Cash, Michelle
Subject:	Q&A
Importance:	High
Sensitivity:	Confidential

Tim -- Sorry for the delay.  We've been putting out fires all day.  Here's the revised Q&A.  Please make sure legal reviews before it is used and/or distributed.

Thanks!
Karen
x39757

 << File: HRQ&A.doc >>


Congrats, Boy


Telecommunications Reports presents . . . . . TR's State NewsWire
January 18, 2001 P.M. Edition

STATES
CALIFORNIA -- Davis nominates new PUC commissioner
INDIANA -- Appeals court rejects cable TV late fee refunds
D.C. -- Suit alleges Verizon is unable to deliver on DSL promises
WISCONSIN -- PSC sets depreciation rates for fixed capital
KANSAS -- Task force recommends extending E911 fee to wireless users
ARIZONA -- Lawmakers examine costs of street cuts to bury fiber
MISSISSIPPI -- Sen. Robertson takes aim at telemarketers
CALIFORNIA -- Davis unveils $167 million in education technology grants
NEW YORK -- Bill aims to create comprehensive telecom privacy law
ARKANSAS -- Bill would prohibit use of wireless phones while driving
IOWA -- NewPath launches DSL service in Des Moines

FUTURE OF REGULATION
CALIFORNIA
Davis nominates new PUC commissioner

Gov. Gray Davis (D.) has nominated Geoffrey Brown to serve as a Public
Utilities Commissioner.  The nomination requires Senate confirmation.
Davis' staff told TR the Senate has one year to act on the
confirmation.  The PUC staff told TR Brown won't begin his term during
today's commission meeting.

Brown would succeed Josiah Neeper, whose term expired Dec. 31, 2000.

Brown is the public defender for the city and county of San Francisco.
He first was elected to the position in 1978 and was reelected in 1982,
1986, 1990, 1994, and 1998.

VIDEO
INDIANA
Appeals court rejects cable TV late fee refunds

The Indiana Court of Appeals has determined that Time Warner
Entertainment Co. L.P.'s cable TV customers aren't entitled to refunds
of late fees they paid but later challenged as excessive.  But the court
remanded to the Marion Superior Court the issue of whether Time Warner
needs the late fees to cover its costs.

In 1998 several Time Warner subscribers filed a lawsuit against the
company claiming that its $4.65 late fee was "excessive, unreasonable,
and a penalty."  The plaintiffs sought recovery of the fees they had
paid and injunctive relief to prohibit the company from continuing to
charge the allegedly excessive fees.

Time Warner cited a study in which it had determined that the 202,000
delinquent customers caused the company to incur costs of $1 million,
amounting to a $5.11 net monthly cost per delinquency.  The company,
therefore, argued that the $4.65 fee doesn't even cover its costs.

On July 9, 1999, the Marion Superior Court dismissed the plaintiffs'
claims for monetary damages.  But in August 1999 the court granted the
plaintiffs' "motion to correct errors" and directed late fee refunds.
Time Warner took that decision to the state appeals court.

Time Warner argued that the "voluntary payment" doctrine bars the
plaintiffs from receiving any monetary damages.  Citing a 1974 case, the
appeals court noted that the general rule is "a voluntary payment made
under a mistake or in ignorance of law, but with a full knowledge of all
the facts, and not induced by any fraud or improper conduct on the part
of the payee, cannot be recovered back."  (City of Evansville v. Walker,
162 Ind. App. 121, 318 N.E.2d 388, 389 (1974))

The appeals court found that the potential loss of cable TV service or
the threat of litigation doesn't constitute "the type of compulsion
necessary to render the late fee payments involuntary.  Review of the
plaintiffs' complaints does not reveal the possibility of any other
compulsion."

The appeals court said the Marion Superior Court is the appropriate
venue for determining whether Time Warner's late fee is cost-justified.
"This approach both allows the trial court to perform its gatekeeping
function at the summary judgment stage of the proceedings and avoids
placing an onerous burden upon the nonmoving party," the court said.

Judge Carr L. Darden wrote the panel's decision, which was joined by
Judges Melissa S. Mattingly and Sanford M. Brook.  (Case no.
49A02-9910-CV-719 - Time Warner Entertainment Co. L.P., vs. Kelly J.
Whiteman and Jean Wilson)

ADVANCED SERVICES
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Suit alleges Verizon is unable to deliver on DSL promises

A Washington, D.C., law firm has filed a class-action lawsuit against
Verizon Communications, Inc., and Verizon Internet Services, Inc., in
the Superior Court of the District of Columbia on behalf of "all persons
and entities throughout the U.S." who have purchased digital subscriber
line (DSL) service from Verizon.

The complaint alleges Verizon failed to keep its marketing promises to
provide continuously available DSL service except for regularly
scheduled maintenance.  The two D.C. residents representing the
purported class say they experienced "significant access disruptions and
significant delays in obtaining technical service."

The complaint seeks an injunction to prevent Verizon from continuing to
sell DSL Internet access until the service problems are resolved and to
require Verizon to compensate customers for the poor service.

The plaintiffs allege that Verizon was aware that it wouldn't be able to
provide DSL service as promised.  Verizon knew its customers would
experience significant disruptions and delays obtaining support, yet it
still "engages in extensive advertising" to promote DSL service and
continues to "sign up more than 3,000 new customers a day," the
complaint says.

The law firm's lead attorney in the case, Gary E. Mason, said, "Verizon
is acutely aware of the service interruptions and service delays, yet
has failed to disclose these problems to current and potential
customers."

A Verizon Internet Services spokesman said the company wouldn't comment
directly on the complaint but noted that DSL technology still is new and
"evolving rapidly, with the attendant stress and strain."  The spokesman
said Verizon will continue to support the technology and is committed to
providing good service.

The law firm representing the plaintiffs is Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld,
and Toll P.L.L.C.  A copy of the complaint is available at
http://www.cmht.com/casewatch/cases/verizon.pdf.  (Superior Court for
the District of Columbia, Bruce G. Forrest and Leslie B. Forrest v.
Verizon Communications, Inc., and Verizon Internet Services, Inc.)

FUTURE OF REGULATION
WISCONSIN
PSC sets depreciation rates for fixed capital

The Public Service Commission has reviewed its guidelines for
establishing classes of fixed capital that telecom utilities use for
public utility purposes, the range of annual depreciation rates for each
of those classes, and the composite range of annual depreciation rates
for all classes of fixed capital.  The commission set the range or
annual depreciation rates at 6.25% to 9.25% for all classes of fixed
capital.

The PSC must conduct the review biennially, pursuant to state law (Wis.
Stat. sect. 196.09(9)(a)(2).  The PSC's order and the guideline for
depreciation rates are available at
http://www.psc.state.wi.us/pdffiles/ord_notc/2881.PDF.  (Docket no.
05-DT-104 - In the Matter of Prescribing Classes of Fixed Capital, a
Range of Annual Depreciation Rates, and a Composite Range of Annual
Depreciation Rates for All Classes of Fixed Capital)

WIRELESS
KANSAS
Task force recommends extending E911 fee to wireless users

The state's Wireless E911 Task Force has recommended extending the
existing monthly wireline user fee of up to 75 cents per user to
wireless users to fund wireless E911 emergency response services.  The
task force's recommendation was included in its final report to the
Legislature.

During the 2000 session, the Legislature passed a measure that directed
the governor to convene a task force to determine "critical" issues
surrounding wireless E911 implementation.  (4/26/00 a.m.)  The issues
examined by the task force included (1) what mechanism should be used to
administer the service, (2) whether an oversight board should be formed,
and (3) how and what costs should be recovered.

The task force "strongly" recommended integrating the administration of
wireless E911 with wireline E911 at the local level.  The task force
said local problems would be handled best at the local level.  It
concluded that a state oversight board would be unnecessary and only
would add another layer of coordination and decision-making.

The task force suggested, however, that an entity act as a
"clearinghouse" for information.  That entity also could act as an
adviser to local government and PSAP (public safety answering point)
operators on policy, training, and education matters.

Additionally, the task force said it was "generally accepted" that PSAPs
could recover all incremental costs for providing phases 1 and 2 of E911
service.  The task force said, "It is also generally assumed that the
local exchange carriers will recover their costs through tariffs or
contracts."

The issue at hand, the task force said, was whether wireless carriers
should be able to share in the proceeds of the wireless user fee to
recover their cost.  The task force recommended that any incremental
cost private-sector companies incurred as a result of federal mandates
be eligible for cost recovery.

The full report is available at
http://www.kcc.state.ks.us/utilities/911tf.htm.

STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT
ARIZONA
Lawmakers examine costs of street cuts to bury fiber

During this session state legislators will consider how much telecom
companies should be required to pay to install their lines, legislative
staff told TR.  The staff said cities throughout the state have been
drafting a study examining the true cost of cutting up streets to lay
fiber optic cable.  The cities say ripping up streets to bury cables
shortens the life spans of the roads.

The legislative staff added that the cities want to be held harmless for
the cost and want telecom companies to pay more than the actual cost of
tearing up and repairing their roads.  The cities want to be compensated
for the shortened life span of the road.

Lawmakers will be examining whether the telecom companies must pay up
front for the shorter life span and how to differentiate between
problems caused by telecom companies ripping up roads and the cities
ripping up roads for various repairs.  The staff said legislators hope
to balance fairness with predictability, enabling companies to have an
understanding of how much they'd be expected to pay before they dig.

Legislative language addressing street cuts is expected to be added to
SB 1128, the staff told TR.  SB 1128 is a "shell bill," which is a
holding a place for the legislation.  Sen. Scott Bundgaard (R., District
19) is sponsoring the bill.

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
MISSISSIPPI
Sen. Robertson takes aim at telemarketers

Sen. Thomas E. Robertson (R., District 51) has introduced SB 2362 to
block telephone solicitors from calling consumers who inform the Public
Service Commission that they object to such calls.  The PSC would have
to create a "no-call" database containing telephone numbers of consumers
who don't want calls from solicitors.  Telephone solicitors wishing to
conduct business in Mississippi would have to purchase access to the
database and register with the PSC.

Even when calling a consumer not listed in the no-call database,
telephone solicitors would have to state their name and reason for
calling at the beginning of each call.  Calls could be made only Monday
through Saturday between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m.

The PSC would promulgate the rules necessary to implement the Act and
would investigate alleged violations.  If a telephone solicitor violated
SB 2362, the PSC could issue a cease-and-desist order or call for a
civil penalty of up to $5,000 per violation.  Consumers listed in the
no-call database that still received calls from solicitors could
complain to the PSC.

Caller ID providers, local exchange telephone companies, and long
distance companies wouldn't be held liable for any other party that
violated SB 2362.

SB 2362 has been referred to the Public Utilities Committee, and a
meeting to discuss the bill could take place as early as Jan. 25.  Two
similar bills, SB 2075 and SB 2267, have been introduced by Sens. Delma
Furniss (D., District 11) and Robert P. Chamberlin (R., District 1),
respectively.  The committee chairman, however, is most likely to
consider SB 2362, the legislative staff told TR.

ADVANCED SERVICES
CALIFORNIA
Davis unveils $167 million in education technology grants

Gov. Gray Davis (D.) has released $167 million in education technology
grants for high schools to help fulfill his commitment to make
up-to-date technology available to high school students.  More than
108,000 multimedia and Internet-capable computers will be added to high
schools as a result of these grants.

Bringing the computers into the schools will bring the statewide ratio
of students to multimedia computers down to 5-1.  When existing
computers are factored in, the statewide ratio of students to all
computers will be about 3.8-1, down from 7-1.  More than 1,800 high
schools will receive grants under the programs.

The grants also will help 155 high schools offer students four or more
Advanced Placement (AP) courses when they open in fall 2001.  Those
schools will receive $4 million of the funds to purchase Internet wiring
and computer hardware for students to access online AP courses.

The governor added that another $8 million in technology grants will be
awarded in the next few weeks.

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
NEW YORK
Bill aims to create comprehensive telecom privacy law

Sen. Carl Kruger (D., District 21) has introduced privacy legislation
(SB 619) to regulate the collection, use, and disclosure of personal
information by telecom carriers.  The bill would establish
"comprehensive privacy protection for subscribers to all forms of
telecommunications services."

It would allow carriers to collect and use "personally identifiable
information" of customers only to the extent necessary to provide
service or in other limited circumstances, such as in response to a
court subpoena.  Carriers would have to obtain customers' affirmative
consent before selling or otherwise disclosing personal information to
third parties.

SB 619 also would prohibit the disclosure, without consent, of
information gathered by monitoring lines to analyze individual use
patterns.

The bill has been referred to the Senate Committee on Energy and
Telecommunications.

WIRELESS
ARKANSAS
Bill would prohibit use of wireless phones while driving

Rep. Kim Hendren (R., District 1) has introduced a bill aimed at
preventing drivers from using wireless phones while operating vehicles.

HB 1229 would allow drivers to use wireless phones designed for
hands-free use as long as they kept both hands on their steering
wheels.  Exceptions would be made for drivers using wireless phones to
report emergency situations and for law enforcement and emergency
response personnel using wireless phones while driving as part of their
jobs.

First time violations of HB 1229 would be punishable by a warning, and
subsequent violations would carry a fine of up to $50.

HB 1229 has been referred to the House Committee on Public
Transportation.

COMPETITIVE LOCAL ENTRY
IOWA
NewPath launches DSL service in Des Moines

NewPath Holdings, Inc., has begun providing digital subscriber line
service to small and midsize businesses in the Des Moines area.  The
company now serves 13 markets in seven states.

Federal law prohibits duplication in any form, including electronic,
without permission of the publisher.

TR's State NewsWire Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000 Telecommunications
Reports International, Inc. (ISSN 1082-9350) is transmitted each
business day at 8 a.m. and 2 p.m., except holidays.
Telecommunications Reports International, Inc.
1333 H St. NW, Suite 100-E
Washington, DC 20005-4707

Associate Editor for Online Publications: Jennifer Erschen, E-mail:
jerschen@tr.com
Senior Legislative & Regulatory Analyst: Gayle Kansagor, E-mail:
gkansagor@tr.com
Senior Research Analyst: Steve Arlowe, E-mail: sarlowe@tr.com
Senior Analyst: Barney McManigal, E-mail: bmcmanigal@tr.com
Account Services: Eileen Callahan (202) 312-6116, (202) 842-3023 (fax)
E-mail: ecallahan@tr.com


Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042623.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM


? The extraordinary session is expected to close early next week, after the
governor has signed SB 28X, a power plant siting bill.  Yesterday, the
governor signed bond financing bill SB 31X.  Once the extraordinary session
is closed, a new extraordinary session is expected to be opened immediately.
However, sources report that no one is certain if the bills from this session
will have the same numbers in the next session.  The legislature reportedly
is trying to arrange so that the bills will not have to be heard again in
committee.

? The MOU still does not have a sponsor.  Governor Davis hopes to reach a
deal with Sempra for the state to purchase San Diego Gas and Electric's
transmission assets.  He reportedly feels that by having deals in place with
SoCal and SDG&E, enough momentum might be added to push the MOU through the
legislature.  He then could go to the bankruptcy court and propose adding
PG&E's assets, since he would have two of the three pieces in place.  The
validity of this logic seems questionable at best.  Sources are skeptical
that adding SDG&E to the MOU would increase the chances of the deal going
through the legislature.  Also, the governor has claimed to be close to
having a deal with SDG&E for several weeks, but such a deal has not yet been
finalized.  The governor stated that he will have a sponsor for the MOU by
next week when the bill will be introduced.  The MOU might be introduced in
the legislature, then amended to indicate a lesser amount for the
transmission asset purchase.  This still would not assure passage since so
many legislators reportedly are against the MOU.

? The windfall profits tax bill has not been set for hearing on the Assemble
floor.

? State Legislature, Elizabeth Hill, published a report earlier this week
regarding an analysis of state revenues.  The report stated that revenues for
this year would be $3.4B less that was expected in January 2001, not
including electricity costs.  She predicts that ongoing state programs will
have to be cut by approximately $1.7B.

? Moody's has put California's credit rating under review for another
downgrade.  Sources report that Moody's, S&P, and MBIA have all informed
California that "the only way the state will improve its credit rating and
look better to investors is to get out of the power business and resolve the
undercollected."