As discussed, we will get time on your schedule tomorrow afternoon (Friday)
to discuss.

	From:  Mike McConnell                           12/28/2000 11:05 AM

To: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: First Gas Writedown

Brent,
Excellent update.  I would like to see the breakdown by pieces for a
potential write-down especially volume difference only and look at a 1 year
adjustment to begin.
Thanks,
Mike

Brent A Price
12/27/2000 11:21 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: First Gas Writedown

---------------------- Forwarded by Brent A Price/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000 10:16
AM ---------------------------

Brent A Price
12/20/2000 10:17 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
Myers/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: First Gas Writedown

First Gas is a liquid fuel supply deal executed in May, 1997 that is linked
to a power plant in the Phillipines.  Volumes were booked at 31,000 barrels
per day with delivery starting June, 1999 through Dec., 2002.  Fuel
deliveries did not begin until April, 2000 and have averaged between
10,000-12,000 barrels per day, well below the volumetric level that was
booked.   This deficiency is due to delayed plant start-up and reduced
consumption and has resulted in approximately $1 million per month in accrual
losses to the Global Products group since April, 2000.  To make matters
worse, the power purchaser from First Gas has recently announced that they
are going to minimally dispatch the power plant to which this transaction is
linked through the end of 2001.

To properly reflect the current volumetric levels associated with First Gas,
we need to take volumes from the 31,000 barrels per day level that was
originally booked to approximately 6,000 barrels per day for the remainder of
the deal.

In addition, freight charges related to this deal have doubled since April,
2000 increasing from the $.70 originally booked to the current $1.45.  Per
conversations with John Chismar he expects freight to remain at this level
for the foreseeable future.

To properly reflect the current costs of this deal, we need to increase the
Dubai spread to which this deal was booked from $2.91 to approximately
$3.65.  Initial estimates of the loss resulting from both the volumetric and
cost proposed write-down of First Gas is $30 million.  We are continuing to
refine this number and will update you when we get a final amount.

On a final note, Arthur Andersen has repeatedly reviewed First Gas throughout
2000 and to this point we have been able to spin enough of an argument to
justify delaying a writedown.  Given the current market conditions discussed
above (which are publicly known), the size of the writedown and the fact that
their next review will be for year-end earnings, I believe Arthur Andersen is
going to require us to write down at least a substantial portion of First Gas
before they will sign-off on earnings.  Obviously, I have not recently
discussed this with AA&Co. but I do anticipate this being an earnings issue.

Please call me if you wish to discuss further.  I appreciate any help you can
give us in this matter.


In another surprise move, the PUC approved an Edison bailout today on a 5-0 vote.  This item was not on the Commission's agenda other than as a placeholder regarding "litigation."  We do not have copies of the agreement but we just talked to Edison's SVP of Regulatory Affairs and here's a summary:

The Commission will keep current rates in place through 2003
Any "overcollection" resulting from keeping current rates in place will go to paying off $3.3 B in Edison's past due accounts (the so-called "undercollection")
If Edison collects the $3.3B prior to 2003, then rates can change
If Edison has not collected the $3.3 B by the end of 2003, the PUC will create a dedicated rate component on all bills to collect the remainder.  Half the remainder will be collected in 2004 and the other half in 2005.
Any refunds received from litigation against suppliers will go to reducing the $3.3 B undercollection.
Edison can keep 10% of any refunds received after the $3.3B is paid off.
Edison cannot pay any dividends during the time that it is using rates to pay off the $3.3B.
Edison can apply to the PUC for approval to hedge gas price risk.
Edison will be protected from any increases in DWR contract costs (i.e., if DWR's costs go up, the PUC will raise rates rather than take it out of Edison's rates)
The PUC will not fine Edison during this period if Edison's capital structure varies from the PUC-approved capital structure
Edison must drop its lawsuits against the PUC regarding 1) the "filed rate doctrine" and 2) the so-called "TURN" accounting method, which effectively kept the rate freeze in place.
Edison agrees to "cooperate" with the Attorney General and the PUC in all litigation against suppliers.
The PUC decision could likely nullify the need for the "special" session that the Governor recently announced

We will report back with additional details as soon as we get them.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:45 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Belden, Tim; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Comnes, Alan; Tribolet, Michael; Walsh, Kristin; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Frazier, Lamar; Keeney, Kevin; Gahn, Scott; Swain, Steve; Lavorato, John; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Calger, Christopher F.; Mara, Susan; Black, Don; Richter, Jeff; Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Mara, Susan; Robertson, Linda; Kingerski, Harry; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Shapiro, Richard; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; Higgason, Kelly; Whalley, Greg; Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject:	California Update--10.02.01:  PUC Turns Down Davis' Proposed Rate Agreement with DWR

In what will likely be viewed as a fairly shocking event, the California PUC today voted down Davis' proposed rate agreement between DWR and the CPUC.
The vote was 4-1, with the two Republicans voting with Davis' hand-picked appointees Lynch and Wood.
Davis' proposal was introduced at the meeting by another Davis appointee--Geoff Brown--who made a lengthy speech about why California would experience economic and political destruction if the PUC did not approve Davis' proposed rate agreement.

What is Davis' proposed rate agreement between DWR and the CPUC?
It would remove all PUC authority to review any contracts between DWR with suppliers.
It would require the PUC to pass through to utility rates all DWR power contract costs, no questions asked.

What are the implications of the move by the PUC to reject Davis' proposal?
With the vote, it remains unclear how California/DWR will pay for the DWR power contracts.
The political pressure to re-negotiate--or break--the DWR power contracts is likely to intensify considerably.
It remains unclear how California/DWR will pay for the $12.5 B in bonds the Treasurer has unsuccessfully attempted to issue for past several months.
Under the structure devised by Davis, the revenues flowing from the CPUC/DWR rate agreement would be used to both 1) pay for the DWR power contracts and 2) service the bonds the Treasurer is trying to issue to repay California's General Fund for spot and other short term power purchased by DWR since January.
In short, there is no clear indication of how California will pay for DWR contracts or issue the bonds.
Safe to say that today's PUC vote has seriously embarrassed Davis, and left his approach to "solving" California electricity crisis in shambles.

What Next?
A broad left-right coalition of energy interests supported a bill (18XX) that passed the Legislature with broad bi-partisan support.
The bill would create a "dedicated rate component" on every customers bill to service the $12.5 B in bonds that the Treasurer wants to issue.
Proponents of the bill--and just about everyone else--argue that the "dedicated rate component" is a signficantly more efficient way to raise the debt California needs to plug the hole in its budget.
The bill is silent, however, on how California would pay for the DWR contracts, and the bill's opponents claim that the power suppliers will sue as a result.
All four PUC commissioners who voted against the Davis rate agreement today urged Davis to sign the bill.  The left-right coalition (from Nader types to oil companies) is also working hard to get Davis to sign it.
Davis has said that he will veto the bill on the advice of the Treasurer and bond counsel.
Given today's vote, however, Davis may have no alternative than to sign the bill if he wants to get the bonds issued and the state budget repaid.

Update on Edison Bailout
Still appears that chances are very small that Edison and Davis will succeed in getting the Legislature to vote for an Edison bailout when it returns for another "special" session next Tuesday.

If you have any questions, just let us know.

Best,
Jeff


Yikes!!!!   I can understand your preoccupation with those issues out there.
I am sure that you are all "talked out" about it, but if you need an
empathetic ear, give me a buzz.  Talk to you later.

Michelle

PS  I saw Julie Parraguirre last night, and she told me to say hello.  She is
going to be teaching at the same school that Cameron attends!


Jim and Rob:
I hope you are both well and was really pleased to see that last week's
merger negotiations reached a successful outcome.This must have required an
incredible effort in the timescale and given everything else that is going
on.I very much hope this will allow  you to enjoy a more stable period after
the events of the last few weeks.You both have many friends at Linklaters
and we are all pulling for you at this time.
I also thought you may like to have a brief overview of the main areas in
which we are assisting at the moment.These are as follows:
1Merger:We are working with Robert Eickenroht on the UK/European anti-trust
aspects.This kicked off with a conference call today.Greatly appreciate the
instructions, Jim.
2Dabhol:We are continuing our role on Dabhol which is now primarily focused
on the litigation side and a major commitment for a 2 partner team-Chris
Walker is ,I believe, in Houston tomorrow to meet with Bruce Lundstrum and
others.Input from the projects side continues (principally in relation to
Sch 11,PPA) but is not likely to be extensive over the next month or so
given the current emphasis in India.
3Enron Europe:We are in close contact with Mark and have a number of ongoing
/ new matters.In particular, we have a dedicated team advising Europe on its
position and contingency planning for current circumstances-this team has
been liaising with Mark Haedicke and the Weil Gotchal team.We are also
assisting on some potential disposals in non core business areas.Our London
secondee remains in place.
4Other:We have a number of ongoing matters ranging from SEDCO litigation
through a bid for LNG purchases from Nigeria LNG.Given the understandable
emphasis on cost control at this time, it may be that we should review these
matters to determine whether you feel it appropriate to  scale back legal
spend in some areas?
On the question of payment,we have invoices totalling more than ?5 million
outstanding and this  level of commitment ,of course, continues to grow in
the light of our ongoing work.As mentioned on Friday, we do need to reduce
this to a more manageable level ( we are currently speaking with Mark and
Bruce, in particular, to find a way of achieving this) and your continuing
support in this effort would be greatly appreciated.
We really want to do all we can,at both a personal and professional level,
to support Enron at this time-I am particularly conscious of the support and
friendship you have given to me over the years.If there is anything else we
can do, please do call me at any time.For convenience my nos. are:
W:44 207 456 5912
M:44 7733 124030
H:44 1959 533292
Best Wishes
Stuart

____________________________________________________________

This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or
otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal
rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know
by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not
copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
____________________________________________________________


Professor Ronn:
I received an e-mail from Meg Brooks in the admissions office stating that I
would be hearing from them this week.  I hope things work out and I can be
contributing to and learning from the program next year.  Thanks again for
all your help.  Hope to hear from you soon.
Ben


Attached is a spreadsheet listing personnel by group.

Thanks - Dan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Delainey, David W.
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 11:14 AM
To:	Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Whalley, Greg; Dietrich, Janet; Leff, Dan; Sharp, Vicki; Haedicke, Mark E.; Oxley, David; McMahon, Jeffrey; Bowen Jr., Raymond
Subject:

Guys, it has come to my attention that there is some discussion to move critical retail risk management and structuring personnel (Rogers Herndon, Dale Furrow, Don Black, Bernie Aucoin, Edith Cross, etc) into NETCO before complete discharge of duties from the retail organization.  It is my expectation that this discharge will not occur until the all EES retail risk contracts are valued and discharged (termination or sale) in an orderly fashion that maximizes value to the estate.  After completion of this effort, these people will be available to the corporation to move to whatever effort you deem appropriate.  I would expect this to take the next four weeks.

Thanks
Dave Delainey


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - messysex.jpg


Well, someone got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.  Tomorrow is
no problem at all as long as if you are up for a few pina coladas by the pool.

Susan M Scott
08/11/2000 09:24 AM
To: Ted Noble/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: R&R

I know how much you're looking forward to "Ted's Weekend of Rest and
Relaxation" and I also realize that carting me back and forth to the car
dealership wasn't exactly on your list of things to do (bear in mind the
dealership is roughly 5 minutes from your apartment)...So, I'm offering you
an out.  I can find someone else to help me if you want to bail (I know how
important your pool-side time is - Remember it's all about you and your
needs."  Just let me know.

FYI:  Galveston does not look like this...


Mark:

One issue to keep in mind regarding membership in this exchange:  if there is
no clearing house and the exchange is the counterparty to all transactions,
who bears the liability when a third party defaults?  We certainly need to
know if it is the exchange membership.  If not, how is the liability limited
and on whose credit would we be relying if we trade?

Mark

Mark Elliott
04/06/99 06:02 AM
To: ECT London European Trading
cc:
Subject: APX - Membership Application

Just to let you know that last Thursday, we submitted, in the name of Enron
Capital & Trade Resources Limited, an application at very short notice to
become one of the first members of the Amsterdam Power Exchange.

The Exchange still has many outstanding issues to resolve re its mode of
operation and I shall keep you informed of progress.  The Exchange is due to
go live, however, at the beginning of May 1999 but our feeling is that there
are so many substantial issues remaining to be resolved that either it shall
not hit this deadline or, if it does, it will be in a very chaotic state.
However please note that initially it is proposed that the Exchange is simply
for day-ahead physical power deals; the Exchange is the counterparty to
transactions and there is no separate clearing house.

It is proposed that at some future stage a financial futures' market will
develop when our SFA-regulated entity will then have to become an Exchange
member - but this is some way off.

Kind regards

Mark


-----Original Message-----
From: Schlesinger, Judith
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:19 AM
To: Vinson, Donald Wayne
Subject: FW: Combined Infol - please pass on

-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Marshall [mailto:jennifer@ceimail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:10 AM
To: Will Maack; VICTORIAR; Veronica; Traci Rasmussen; Tom Dunn; toad hoover; TheTravelTree@aol.com; Tammy McLain; Stephanie Snell Beville; Stef !!; Walker, Stacy; soilfarm@mail.ev1.net; Smashtray; Scotty Trahan; Schlesinger, Judith; sarthur@indigopool.com; Sandy; RandalPrice@aol.com; Peggy Martin; Patricia Biedka; Pamel & Bubba Schmidt; Nancy Carey; Michelle Sharp; Michelle & Brian Dunwell; Melissa Ashburn; Marty; martha_lallie; mariella Borza; Marguerite Ryder; lsmith2@sial.com; Loretta Runyan (E-mail); Looooassssss; Linda 2; Lee Obrien; Laurie Bolderick; Kim Stewart; Katie Fitzpatrick; KARYN; kari kelly; juliarose@hotmail. com (E-mail); Jpressman@att. net (E-mail); joel.shaw@weatherford.com; Joan Laughlin; Jerry Baiamonte; Jenny Wenzrel; Janet Moos; Jackie Vitulli; Holly Guillaume; Handy Ann Provine; Greg Marshall; Glenn Gelder; Elizabeth Tucker; Dr. Stan Zyblot; Douglas T. Lowry; Dick Hanson; Debbie Van Winkle; Dave Tillman; Dave "Badboy" Mooney; Darryl Martin Vallot; Cynthia Foteh (E-mail); Cutie Pie Angel Bunny; Courtney West; Christy Oelsen; Christine Garcia; Charles Melton; Chad Stewart; Cathy @SPCA; Buddy Fojt; Bob Dad Fife; Beverly Mc Conn; Bennie; Barry Wade; Amy Vanny-Fanny Hodges; Amy Dunn; Amy "Mother" Bonnette; Alexandra Sanders; Adam Elvis Kliebert
Subject: Combined Infol - please pass on

AT 6P.M. FRIDAY, THERE WILL BE A MOMENT OF SILENCE.  IT IS ASKED THAT YOU PLEASE STOP WHAT YOUR DOING AND LIGHT A CANDLE IN MEMORY OF ALL THAT HAVE PASSED.

Please pass on!

TRIBUTE TO THE UNITED STATES
> >
> > This, from a Canadian newspaper, it's worth sharing.
> > Widespread but only partial news coverage was given
> > recently to a remarkable editorial broadcast from
> > Toronto by Gordon Sinclair, a Canadian television
> > Commentator. What follows is the full text of his
> > trenchant remarks as printed in the Congressional
> > Record:
> > America: The Good Neighbor.
> >
> > "This Canadian thinks it is time to speak up for the
> > Americans as the most generous and possibly the
> > least appreciated people on all the earth. Germany,
> > Japan and, to a lesser extent, Britain and Italy
> > were lifted out of the debris of war by the
> > Americans who poured in billions of dollars and
> > forgave other billions in debts.
> >
> > None of these countries is today paying even the
> > interest on its remaining debts to the United
> > States. When France was in danger of collapsing in
> > 1956, it was the Americans who propped it up, and
> > their reward was to be insulted and swindled on the
> > streets of Paris. I was there. I saw it.
> >
> > When earthquakes hit distant cities, it is the
> > United States that hurries in to help. This spring,
> > 59 American communities were flattened by tornadoes.
> > Nobody helped. The Marshall Plan and the Truman
> > Policy pumped billions of dollars into discouraged
> > countries. Now newspapers in those countries are
> > writing about the decadent, war mongering Americans.
> >
> > I'd like to see just one of those countries that is
> > gloating over the erosion of the United States
> > dollar build its own airplane. Does any other
> > country in the world have a plane to equal the
> > Boeing Jumbo Jet, the Lockheed Tri-Star, or the
> > Douglas DC10?
> >
> > If so, why don't they fly them? Why do all the
> > International lines except Russia fly American
> > Planes? Why does no other land on earth even
> > consider putting a man or woman on the moon? You
> > talk about Japanese technocracy, and you get radios.
> > You talk about German technocracy, and you get
> > automobiles. You talk about American technocracy,
> > and you find men on the moon - not once, but several
> > times - and safely home again.
> >
> > You talk about scandals, and the Americans put
> > theirs right in the store window for everybody to
> > look at. Even their draft-dodgers are not pursued
> > and hounded. They are here on our streets, and most
> > of them, unless they are breaking Canadian laws, are
> > getting American dollars from ma and pa at home to
> > spend here.
> >
> > When the railways of France, Germany and India were
> > breaking down through age, it was the Americans who
> > rebuilt them. When the Pennsylvania Railroad and the
> > New York Central went broke, nobody loaned them an
> > old caboose. Both are still broke.
> >
> > I can name you 5000 times when the Americans raced
> > to the help of other people in trouble. Can you name
> > me even one time when someone else raced to the
> > Americans in trouble? I don't think there was
> > outside help even during the San Francisco
> > earthquake.
> >
> > Our neighbors have faced it alone, and I'm one
> > Canadian who is damned tired of hearing them get
> > kicked around. They will come out of this thing
> > with their flag high. And when they do, they are
> > entitled to thumb their nose at the lands that are
> > gloating over their present troubles. I hope Canada
> > is not one of those."
> >
> > Stand proud, America! Wear it proudly!!
> >
> > This is one of the best editorials that I have ever
> > read regarding the United States. It is nice that
> > one man realizes it. I only wish that the rest of
> > the world would realize it. We are always blamed for
> > everything, and never even get a thank you for the
> > things we do.

> To show the terrorists that  we Americans stick together, FRIDAY
> SEPTEMBER  14, is "Flags Across America."
> > All Americans  are asked to display the American flag  either in
> their homes or cars.
> > Let's keep the meaning  of UNITED in "United States".
> > Pass it on.

LET'S STAND BEHIND OUR COUNTRY AND DRESS IN OUR COLORS TOMORROW.

in memory of all those who perished this morning; the passengers and the
pilots on the United Air and AA flights, the workers in the World Trade
Center and the Pentagon, and all the innocent bystanders. Our prayers go
out to the friends and families of the deceased. Send this to at least 10
people to show your support. DON'T BREAK IT!!!!!!  God's speed to all those who
have lost their lives...GOD BLESS AMERICA and the freedom it represents
tomorrow is US pride day, everyone wear US colors (jeans are blue,
everyone owns a white t-shirt, etc).  try to be wearing as much red white and
blue as you can.  send this message to as many other people you know.  Lets get
the whole country into it.  At least send it to 10 other people.

Please forward this message on to whomever I may have inadvertently missed.


Amy, this is way late, so sorry.  I suggest running it by the HR leadership
team.  The email list can be obtained from Gerry Gibson at corp.  If there
are HR openings, and she would be interested, they would most probably be the
best people to assess her skills.  Thanks.  Michelle

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Amy Gambill @ ENRON                           09/27/2000 09:57 AM

To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Debra Ruby's Resume

Michelle,
Thanks so much for the feedback on Debra's resume.  Ted and I also shared it
with Brian Schaffer who said he would potentially like to have her in his
group, but has no openings right now.  You'd mentioned in your e-mail that
there may be HR possibilites for her and she's expressed an interest in
exploring that kind of a career move (see below).  Do you know of something
specific or anyone else I should share her resume with?

I really appreciate your help!
Amy
---------------------- Forwarded by Amy Gambill/Corp/Enron on 09/27/2000
09:54 AM ---------------------------

Glebeplace@aol.com on 09/26/2000 07:54:58 PM
To: Amy.Gambill@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Debra Ruby's Resume

Thank you so much for circulating my resume and for forwarding the positive
feedback to me.  As a matter of fact, I am very interested in exploring the
possibility of a transition from a Legal Department position to a  Human
Resources position.  Even though there may not be an opening at this time, it
would still be very interesting to speak with someone who has made this
career change.
Thank you again,  Debra


Hi to all,

Just an update on the Family Cookbook that I hope to have done by the next reunion.  Here's what I have so far.  Can everyone who's last name starts with an S please send in a recipe to me by next Friday?

Staab Recipes

SOUPS
Chili
Danish Potato
String Bean and Dumpling
NOODLES and DUMPLINGS
Fried Sauerkraut and Dumplings
Knibble and Kdubble
Noodles and Tomatoes
BREADS
Banana Bread Like No Other
APPETIZERS
Barbecued Shrimp
Bruchetta with Tomatoes
Hamburger Pizza Buns
Sausage Bread
Stuffed Vienna Bread
Ugly Dip
DESSERTS
Moon Cake
Pumpkin Cookies
BEVERAGES
Strawberry Lemonade
SALADS
Crab Pasta Salad
MAIN DISHES or MEATS
Chicken Enchiladas
SAUCES

I am still getting an error on Steve Staab and Sonny Staabs email address.  Could I have one person send me a correction please?
Westlake@idcomm.com, (Steve Staab), PaulStaab@yahoo.com (Sonny Staab).

Everyone please have a Happy and Safe Halloween!

Thanks,
Becky Cookson


Lisa Palmer and I had a conference call with the Xerox lawyer and commercial
person.  The main issues are the following:

No CSA (claim to have over 40 ISDA Masters none of which contain CSA's! and
not set up to handle collateral)
Rating downgrade is a Termination Event.  (Maybe they'll agree to our posting
L/C's
MUST have cross-acceleration (POLICY).
Guess what else?  NO NETTING (can't handle netting internally)

Otherwise, Xerox is cool.


Jeff:
Nice meeting you last Thursday. We will send the (lengthy) Application
for CPCN and tariff(s) this week for your review. I know Anita faxed
some additional material, but will also supplement that per our
discussions.
    I did lobbying in Sacramento and know the legislature's compulsion
for telecom. "consumer" issues - you mentioned SB 1217 (Richard Alarcon)
which did pass through Deb Bowen's committee and the Senate, but which
is going nowhere in the Assembly (Wright's committee).  This bill re
open access is contrary to Federal law and to the FCC's hands-off
stance, and appears dead.  There is still the ongoing debate in Portland
(and SF) which will turn on an upcoming 9th Cir. court decision (due any
day now).  The 9th Cir. could breathe life into this issue by allowing
Portland's open access mandate via the transfer of the franchise
agreement. Also note today's WSJ article re AOL's new found quandry.
The tide is against open access for the moment.
    Please call or email if you have nay questions whatsoever.
Jeremy Meier
Blumenfeld & Cohen
394-7500


Start Date: 1/15/02; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011522.txt


Shirely, please print this out for Vice before the meeting.

Thanks,

Ravi.
----- Forwarded by Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications on 01/18/00 02:00
PM -----

	John Griebling
	Sent by: Michol Boyd
	01/18/00 01:41 PM

		 To: EC Employees -- All
		 cc:
		 Subject: Network Engineering and Operations Organizational Chart

The Network Engineering and Operations organization is taking shape.  The
attached organization chart reflects my direct reports and the major
disciplines within the engineering organization.  Please support this
leadership team in executing our mission to support our current network as
well as deploy the GFN infrastructure and support systems.

You will notice that there are many leadership openings in the organization,
please direct any input regarding external candidates for these positions to
Patty Pennington.

The Network Engineering Team is also attempting to recruit between 30 to 50
people (as dictated by budget availability) across the indicated disciplines
by mid-year.


FYI.  Dave's proposal to Steve.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harris, Steven
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:39 AM
To:	'david.a.foti@accenture.com@ENRON'
Cc:	Donoho, Lindy
Subject:	RE: ECS Contract Review & New Idea

Dave,
	If possible, I would like for you to sit down with Lindy and a few folks from our group who have been looking at this. I want to make sure that it would be an efficient use of your time and that we would not be duplicating anything. I will have Lindy contact you so we can set something up and then move forward as necessary. Thanks.
	Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	david.a.foti@accenture.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:20 AM
To:	Harris, Steven
Subject:	ECS Contract Review & New Idea

Steve -

I worked it out so you will be getting the lowest possible rate for my
time, $175/hour (normal rate is $350).  I would like to send you an
engagement letter this week for up to 3 weeks or 120 hours ($21k).  I think
we can get it done in less time but the 120 hours provides some flexibility
if we decide to go deeper on something -- we would only charge you for the
hours we use.

I am visualizing the deliverable as an analysis of your restructuring
options as well as the NPV, Income, and operational effect for each.  To
the extent time allows, I will be able to help negotiate and close whatever
option you choose.

In order for me to offer our preferred rate, it is important to note that I
would need to be able to do this project on somewhat of a flexible basis
(e.g. Friday meetings, emails, and phone vs. being on-site 3 weeks
full-time).  Even with this flexible structure, I feel confident that we
can have the deliverable complete by mid December.

Please let me know if it is ok to draw up an engagement letter with these
terms.

========================

As for the new idea ----

I have been spending much of my time lately helping merchant power
generators think about ways to leverage the value of their asset
position/market intelligence.  It occurred to me that there is an analogy
here that relates to pipelines.

Pipelines have operational "events" that may have  market effects:
    Unplanned outage  (major/minor/duration/notice)
   Planned outages over a certain volume
   Operation flow order/ SOLs
   Key Plants backed in
   Takes over schedule volumes key points
   Linepack levels
   Pressure drops at key points

Since the pipeline is exposed to gas prices through  gas needed for
operational purchases - it is rationale that these phenomena would  be
studied and acted (read traded) upon in order to minimize TW's market risk
(read generate income).  TW can setup a risk management group to execute
this idea. It is not unusual for a pipeline to  have a risk management
function -  Duke Pipeline for example has a VP of  Risk Management for
Pipelines.

These "events" would be studied in the follow way -

1. Determine whether there is a correlation between  an  "event" and gas
prices/basis differentials. - based on historical  data.
2.  For those events that have a strong  correlations, develop a trading
strategy around the relationship.
3.  Back-test the trading strategy against  historical data - determine
profitability.
4.  For operational "events" that are  applicable, setup a system to
execute program trading that is directly linked to  SCADA.

Secondary benefits of this risk management (trading) strategy, would be
developing the expertise to make decisions related to benefits of selling
the capacity physical vs. through basis derivatives. (or some  combination
of both)

Steve, if you are interested in this idea I can  start drawing up a
workplan for this study.

Dave

David A. Foti
Accenture
2929 Allen Parkway,  Suite 2000
Houston, Texas 77019
713/837-1997

----- Forwarded by David A. Foti/Internal/Accenture on 10/30/2001 06:50 AM
-----

            David A. Foti
                                         To:     Steven.Harris@enron.com
            10/27/2001 04:13 PM          cc:
                                         Subject:     Contract Review & $20 MM RCM

Steve -

 I have some ideas related to ECS contract restructuring options.  If your
team is available I could come by next Friday mid-morning or later  to
start discussing  with them.

On the administrative side, I am working to nail down the lowest hourly
rate I can get for you.  I would probably propose something like 80 hours *
rate, in the engagement letter.  This amount of time should be adequate to
put together a short study on your different options.  I will send you a
engagement letter this week.  I would just need to get that signed by you
before Friday.

Also, please let me know if you need any other information on the
Reliability Centered Maintenance idea, as you prepare to talk to the other
officers.

Dave

David A. Foti
Accenture
2929 Allen Parkway,  Suite 2000
Houston, Texas 77019
713/837-1997

            Steven.Harris@enron.c
            om                           To:     David A. Foti/Internal/Accenture@Accenture
                                         cc:     Audrey.Robertson@enron.com
            10/11/2001 10:56 AM          Subject:     RE: TW Earnings Idea - Twist on ECS Deals

Sounds great. Just check with Audrey (3-5849) and she can put you on my
calendar. I am out all of next week. Thanks.

     Steve

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   david.a.foti@accenture.com@ENRON
   Sent:   Wednesday, October 10, 2001 3:52 PM
   To:     Harris, Steven
   Subject:  TW Earnings Idea - Twist on ECS Deals

   Hello Steve -

   Haven't talked to you in a while, hope all is well.  A quick update - I
   moved over from EES to Accenture's Energy group about six months ago and
   have been focusing on Trading and Risk Management & Pipeline
   Optimization
   projects.

   I had an idea which I thought you might find interesting.  Accenture has
   a
   strategic alliance with a technology provider for Reliability Centered
   Maintenance (RCM) -- basically an advanced methodology & technology for
   making maintenance decisions.  They are the standard for electric T&D
   companies and are now trying to move over into the pipeline segment.
   This
   is how I was thinking about using them to structure a deal:

   1.  TW hires Accenture to implement RCM
   2.  RCM Benefits are determined by a pilot project (4 weeks)
   3.  Accenture pays TW upfront for 10 years of projected benefits from
   RCM
   (say $20MM) as part of our "guarantee"
   4.  TW pays Accenture an annual licensing fee for the use of RCM over
   the
   next 10 years which will flow into the next rate case.

   I am currently pursuing another project with Ben Asante, so I am around
   the
   Enron building.  Let me know if you would like to get together to
   discuss
   further.

   Hope all is well.

   Dave
   713-252-9061 (mobile)

   David A. Foti
   Accenture
   2929 Allen Parkway,  Suite 2000
   Houston, Texas 77019
   713/837-1997

   This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
   privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in
   error,
   please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
   use of the email by you is prohibited.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.


Now I have three places to be on December 1st.  Super Saturday, Portland
Christmas Party and Brazil.  I working on the cloning process.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 11/18/2000
12:25 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Gina Corteselli                           11/18/2000 10:01 AM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, kimberly.hillis@enron.com
cc: Miguel Padron/NA/Enron@ENRON, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: VP PRC Committee - Participation in ESA VP Pre Ranking

Mr. Lavorato,

As a member of the VP  PRC Committee you have been selected to attend ESA BU
PRC meeting on December 1, 2000 in Sao Paulo.   You'll be responsible for
attending and participating in the VP pre-ranking  portion of this meeting.
The PRC team or the appropriate HR rep will contact you with additional
details the exact time of that part of the meeting.

We realize you may have some scheduling difficulties, kindly review your
calendar and let us know whether you may be able to attend the scheduled
meeting.  In the event that you cannot, we will try to adjust the schedule or
assignments.

The Calendar of meetings is attached for your information.

The VP MD PRC Committee will likely be reconvened shortly so that we can
review  the roles and responsibilities of the Committee members.  We will
keep you apprised of this meeting as details develop.

Lastly, as you know, the final VP PRC meetings will be held on January 5 and
8 at the St. Regis Hotel in Houston.  Additional details on these meetings
will also be forthcoming.

Should you have any questions or concerns; please do not hesitate to contact
me or David Oxley directly.

Many thanks,

Gina Corteselli,
 Enron  Global Performance Management


I am so sorry.  You guys gave him a really good life.

"Robert Kean" <rkean@starband.net> on 07/07/2001 01:48:08 PM
Please respond to <rkean@starband.net>
To: "Pat Hilleman \(E-mail\)" <pat.hilleman@rsparch.com>, "Greg Smith
\(E-mail\)" <grsmith@qwest.net>, "Greg Smith \(E-mail 2\)"
<gregory_r_smith@uhc.com>, "Colin Lamb \(E-mail\)" <dsmcolin@home.com>,
"Maggie Kean \(E-mail\)" <Ginny85956@aol.com>, "Nora Kean \(E-mail\)"
<Beetle81088@aol.com>, "Nora Kean \(E-mail 2\)" <nora_kean@duchesne.org>,
"Sann & Evelyn Gossum \(E-mail\)" <gossumr@worldnet.att.net>, "Doug & Karen
Reiman \(E-mail\)" <dkreiman@mcleodusa.net>, "Jean Kean \(E-mail\)"
<rex04@msn.com>, "Kathy Wedig \(E-mail\)" <kat.wedig@netzero.net>, "Melissa
Kean \(E-mail\)" <kean@rice.edu>, "Phil Kean \(E-mail\)"
<kean.philip@mcleodusa.net>, "Steve & Melissa Kean \(E-mail\)"
<skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Houston 1996 - 2001

Houston died today after a long battle with Auto Immune Hemolytic Anemia.
Rest in peace.

Rob Kean


You might mark your calendar for a lunch (12-1:30) at the Hyatt downtown on
Wednesday December 13 where Barton Smith of UH and George Tolley of the U. of
Chicago will present the findings of their economic study.  The Houston Forum
event will be part of the Kenneth L. Lay Lecture Series in Global Economics
at the University of Houston.  (I will have a table for Enron.)

The authors presented their preliminary results to us this week, and the
total benefits of the planned ozone reduction (all SIP measures as currently
proposed) are below $100 million (we are indoors most of the time that bad
air days are occurring since it is typically very hot), and the costs are
around $5 billion out to 2010.   Lots of caveats to this conclusion including
the assumption of today's best technology but no more.  The high costs
include a "last mile" problem that the proposal of the Partnership's Business
Coalition for Clean Air (BCCA) avoids (such as no noon-to-midnight
construction, a 75% average point source reduction to allow for trading and
future permits instead of a 90% reduction, etc.).

The effect on Houston is to reduce our forecast economic growth but not
eliminate it.  Real wages are forecast to fall by some 5% or more under the
current SIP versus without it.  Total job loss will be over 100,000--about a
1 and a half years of growth out to 2010.   This "shock" will be around
one-half of what Houston went through after the oil price crash in 1986
according to Dr. Smith.  One might say that slower growth and spreading the
pollution around (some of our refinery/petrochemical growth going elsewhere)
is not the end of the world, however, if a more cost-effective SIP is chosen.

It will be several weeks before the results are final (and the election
over), at which time an executive summary will be released.  The Mayor's
office and TNRCC will be briefed first.  The luncheon will be the formal
unveiling of the study with explanation, but I expect press coverage of the
study next month.

As head of the economics working group, I have tried to ensure that a
top-notch analysis was done without an industry bias.  The results are
considered conservative by the authors all things considered and in line with
the peer-reviewed literature on costs and benefits.  The study is not
intended to be a "whining" study but to give us realistic expectations and to
(naturally) bring into review some "last mile" problems where certain SIP
measures are the least cost effective.

These preliminary results are confidential given the political cycle we are
in and should not be shared externally.

- Rob


Ann,  I have completed the review of the comments to the Enfolio.  It might
make the most sense to discuss these over the phone to get quicker
resolution.  Are you available tommorrow afternoon to discuss the comments.

	"Crawford, Ann" <AnnCrawford@aec.ca>
	03/21/2001 11:37 AM

		 To: "'Gerald.Nemec@enron.com'" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: ENRON DRAFT ENFOLIO AGREEMENT AND COMMENTS

Hello Gerald,

Just a follow up note on the status of the review of our comments on the new
ENFOLIO.  Please give me a call or drop me a note.  I hope we can get the
contract settled.

I still have not heard what is happening with the credit side.  I have not
received signed confirms as yet.

Regards,

Ann

403-266-8425

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Crawford, Ann
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 6:47 PM
> To: 'Gerald.Nemec@enron.com'
> Subject: ENRON DRAFT ENFOLIO AGREEMENT AND COMMENTS
>
> Gerald,
>
> Per the attached cover letter explaining AEC's requested changes, I attach
> both a blackline copy and a clean copy of the edited agreement.  Please
> comment asap on items regarding the bolded text in sections 3.2, 3.4 and
> 8.3.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ann M. Crawford
> Gas Marketing
> Sr.Contract Administrator
>
> Phone: 403-266-8425
> Fax: 403-290-8479
>
>
>  <<aecm.amc.ltr.enrn.doc>>  <<DRAFT IN ENRN EDIT.doc>>  <<DRAFT IN ENRN
> EDIT C.doc>>

 - aecm.amc.ltr.enrn.doc
 - DRAFT IN ENRN EDIT.doc
 - DRAFT IN ENRN EDIT C.doc


Sandy:
Susan Bailey passed on to me your comments to the ISDA draft and I can
respond to some but not all of such comments at this point:

1. With respect to your Canadian securities rep, I am checking with our
counsel in Canada about whether we can use your language instaed of ours.

2. With respect to the Options rep and the ESP rep in part %, Section (b), I
believe that both parties need to make such reps.  The rep in Part 5
(b)(g)(ii) is to cover the Trade Option exemption and it is different from
the ESP rep below it.

3. With respect to the language in Part 5, Section (a), this is different
from the setoff language.    What this is saying is that if a party has
fulfilled all of its payment obligations and an Event of Default occurs with
respect to it (the "Defaulting Party"), the other party cannot withhold any
payment that it owes to the Defaulting Party.  This is different from the
exercise of setoff rights.

4. I would like to discuss with you or your legal representative the removal
of the arbitration language as it is Enron's policy to have arbitration apply.

5. We would prefer to keep the Termination Currency specified in US Dollars.

6. Our tax group believes that we need the language in Part 3(a)(i), (ii).
Why do you want to delete it?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
E-Mail Carol.St.Clair@enron.com


The following is the latest synopsis of important election news. Please share
with your friends and family.

Thank you.

Contents:
1 U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Bush Appeal
2 Statement On Florida Supreme Court Rejection Of Gore Campaign Demand For
Miami-Dade Recount
3 Facts On Illinois Ruling On Dimpled Ballots
4 What About Today's Action on Military Ballots?
5 The Greenwood Position: Now We Must Fight for Our Country
6 Washington Post: Gore Can't Heal the Hurt
7 Wall Street Journal: How Democrats Wage Political War
8 Exit Polling Says At Least 1.5% Of Americans Did Not Vote In Presidential
Contest
9 Voting Instructions Were Clear in Palm Beach County

________________________________________________
1

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to intervene in the Florida presidential
recount, saying Friday it will hear one of George W. Bush's appeals that
seeks to bar hand-counted ballots in the disputed election. In a stunning
development and a victory for Bush, the nation's highest court said it will
hear arguments Dec. 1 on whether to overturn the Florida Supreme Court's
decision that allowed manually recounted votes to be added to Florida's vote
total.

_______________________________________________
2

Statement On Florida Supreme Court Rejection Of Gore Campaign Demand For
Miami-Dade Recount

"We are pleased with the Supreme Court decision. It was our strong belief
that the Florida Supreme Court would deny this motion. The court had already
extended the statutory deadline for an additional 12 days and Al Gore was
asking them to extend it yet again.

"Thursday night Al Gore thanked the canvassing boards for their hard work and
praised the Supreme Court decision. Since then he has sued one of those
canvassing boards and asked the Supreme Court to change its mind. It seems Al
Gore wants the Court to keep extending the deadline until he can count the
votes enough times to change the result."

_______________________________________________
3

Facts On Illinois Ruling On Dimpled Ballots

 ~ The Illinois Supreme Court Ruling was incorrectly cited by the Gore
campaign and the Florida Supreme Court, and does NOT require dimpled ballots
to be counted.

~ In fact, in the Illinois case, dimpled ballots were not counted at all.
Illinois attorney Burton Odelson, who represented the challenger in the 1990
Illinois case, said, "the judge did not count ballots that were indented
because he could not determine the voters' intent."

~ Contrary to the arguments made by David Boies for the Gore campaign, Cook
County Circuit Judge Francis Barth said, "I don't believe the fact that an
impression standing alone counts necessarily that this voter intended then to
vote."

~ Of the 27 disputed ballots the Illinois Supreme Court ordered Judge Barth
to examine, he rejected nine dimpled ballots because, as he said, the dents
were insufficient to prove the voter's intent. He rejected four others with
pinholes that were misaligned, accepted three "hanging chads," in which the
perforation was partially attached, and approved five ballots punctured by
pinholes. Six
disputed ballots were withdrawn.

~ Michael Levelle, a Democrat lawyer representing the Republican candidate in
Illinois, initially signed an affidavit on behalf of the Gore campaign saying
to the best of his recollection, he believed Judge Barth counted indented
ballots. But when later told that Judge Barth did not include dimpled
ballots, Levelle recanted: "I couldn't
remember details. The affidavit was more general than specific."
_______________________________________________
4

What About Today's Action on Military Ballots?

~ To protect the rights of our military men and women to have their votes
count, the Bush-Cheney campaign today is asking a Florida Circuit Court in
Tallahassee to require canvassing boards to immediately go back and review
overseas military ballots for inclusion in the final vote tally.

~ We urge Al Gore to support this action.

~ One week ago tonight, in an orchestrated effort that included a five-page
memo by a Gore attorney, Al Gore's supporters objected to as many military
ballots as they could find. The Gore campaign never should have knocked out
the votes of the men and women who wear our nation's uniform.

~ That's no way to treat the men and women who serve our country. They never
should have taken that action in the first place.

~ Today is the day to right this wrong.

~ A State Judge will conduct a hearing at 2:00 today in Leon County to hear
our case. We hope the Judge will ask the Boards to review these military
ballots so our servicemen and women aren't disenfranchised.

~ Given the remarks made about counting military ballots by Senator
Lieberman, Florida's Democratic Senator Bob Graham, and Florida's Democratic
Attorney General (and chairman of Gore's Florida campaign) Bob Butterworth,
we can't imagine the Gore campaign will once again oppose the voting rights
of our servicemen and women.

______________________________________________
5

The Greenwood Position
Now we must fight for our country
BY PEGGY NOONAN
Friday, November 24, 2000

"We must fight. And we all know it. And it's fine.

"We like to complain, those of us of a certain age, that history has never
given us the gaudy challenges it gave our parents and grandparents. But we've
had our traumas, and from the time we were children: assassinations, riots,
Vietnam, Watergate, the ayatollah, a stuck economy, the fall of the wall.
We've had our moments.

"And now we face a great trial.

"And we're up to it.

"So let's go."

Full Story:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=65000671

_______________________________________________
6

Washington Post
Gore Can't Heal the Hurt
By Richard Cohen
Friday, November 24, 2000

"I voted for Al Gore. I did so because I have known him since he was a
congressman from Tennessee. I admire his intellect, his seriousness of
purpose, his capacity for hard work and study, his political values, his
experience and his knowledge. That being said, I now think that
under current circumstances he would not be the right man for the presidency.
If I could, I would withdraw my vote. In the terminology of the moment, put
me down as a hanging chad.

"I still think precisely as I have about Gore. But those 'current
circumstances' I just mentioned change everything. Given the present
bitterness, given the angry irresponsible charges being hurled by both camps,
the nation will be in dire need of a conciliator, a likable guy
who will make things better and not worse. That man is not Al Gore. That man
is George W. Bush.

"Bush has incessantly proclaimed himself as that sort of guy--'a uniter, not
a divider.' The tendency is to dismiss that sort of chest-thumping as
campaign nonsense, but in Bush's case it appears to be true. After all, the
Bush boomlet began among his fellow Republican governors, each of whom
probably thought the next president should be
none other than himself.

"So it says something about Bush that the governors were able to coalesce
around him. Some of these governors knew Bush quite well, some hardly at all,
but the fact remains that they all seemed to genuinely like the guy and
respected his leadership abilities.

"You hear the same sort of thing from people who worked with Bush in private
enterprise. I talked with one of them once, a Democrat who disagreed with
Bush on many issues. Yet he, too, praised Bush's leadership abilities, his
talent for bringing order out of chaos and for reaching some sort of
consensus. That man's testimony impressed
me. His disagreements with Bush were real, his admiration for him profound.

"Gore, on the other hand, has little of those abilities. His own party is
sore at him for taking the one-two punch of peace and prosperity and running
a race that is still not concluded. His performance was as erratic as his
uniform-of-the-day: earth tones on Tuesday, business suit on Wednesday. The
country sensed that either he did not know
himself, or what he did know the country would not like."

Full Story:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A55133-2000Nov23.html

_______________________________________________
7

Wall Street Journal
How Democrats Wage Political War
-Controlling the government is imperative to the party's survival.
BY CLETA MITCHELL
Monday, November 20, 2000

"In case you're bewildered by the machinations of the Gore
campaign-turned-law-firm, let there be no doubt that the goings on in Florida
are perfectly in keeping with the way Democrats normally think and behave.
Lawsuits are a key part of the Democrats' political strategy, so nothing
about Florida should surprise anyone who has spent time in the Democratic
Party.

"Until 1995, I was a Democrat. I've been a Democrat elected official, a party
official and an active party member, so I know how Democrats think.

"Democrats know and internalize, understand and are motivated by, certain
ideas, concepts and principles that seem to be foreign to Republicans. And
Democrats are elated that Republicans don't know or function under the same
ideas. These basic rules of Democratic thinking are at work in Florida. This
primer should help explain what makes the Democrats tick.

"Rule 1: If we don't win, we don't eat.

"Rule 2: State courts are 'home' to Democrats.

"Rule 3, the 'golden rule': He who makes the rules wins the gold."

Full Story:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=65000648
 ____________________________________________________________
8

Exit Polling Says At Least 1.5% Of Americans Did Not Vote In
Presidential Contest

While the Gore campaign says dimpled ballots must be counted because every
voter obviously intended to vote in the Presidential contest, FOX NEWS
reports that at least 1.5% of voters told exit pollsters on November 7 that
they did not vote in the presidential race. Experts say this understates the
actual percentage of people who voted in down ballot races, but NOT in the
presidential contest.

The number of "undervoters" in the three Florida recount counties the Gore
campaign is trying to mine for additional votes is roughly 1.5-2.25%, well
within the range suggested by the exit polls.

____________________________________________________________
9

From the voting instructions card for Palm Beach:
"AFTER VOTING, CHECK YOUR BALLOT CARD TO BE SURE YOUR VOTING SELECTIONS ARE
CLEARLY AND CLEANLY PUNCHED AND THERE ARE NO CHIPS LEFT HANGING ON THE BACK
OF THE CARD."

From the Official PALM BEACH COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS website.
http://pbcelections.org/

Link to the "Voting Instructions" card for Palm Beach:
http://pbcelections.org/Sample%20Ballots/instruct.jpg
Or from this page, under "Voting Instructions":
http://pbcelections.org/Sample%20Ballots/sampleballot.htm

Conclusion: These instructions show that the voter was given advice to avoid
dimple and hanging chads.

-----------------------------------------------------------

If you wish to unsubscribe from the eChampion mailing list, simply click here:

http://www.clickaction.net/partner/echampions2000/unsubscribe_box.html

To become an eChampion click here:

http://www.echampions2000.com


I am a bit unclear.  Are these ready for my final review yet?  If so, I will get right on them.  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 8:40 AM
To:	Johnson, Rick; Clark, Mary; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
Cc:	Oxley, David; Cash, Michelle; James, Terrie
Subject:	RE: A few questions about the scripts

Thanks for the info, Rick.  We also need to add one more question to the supervisor Q&A:  Will I still receive severance if the company files for bankruptcy? thx. kd

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Rick
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 8:08 AM
To:	Clark, Mary; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
Cc:	Oxley, David; Cash, Michelle; James, Terrie; Denne, Karen
Subject:	RE: A few questions about the scripts

Mary, based on the most current information:
1.	A&B employees will receive bonus consideration however the amount is not dependant or determined by their A / B designation.   Accordingly, any mention of bonus in the scripts will need to rely on what we have said in the past, I.E. Bonus will be dependant on financial performance and employee contributions over the past year.
As result of this interpitation, Bonus, albeit a element of retention, should not be included as an inducement to retention at this time.  (source - Aaron Brown)
2.	The employees on the D - list are being placed on paid furlough and being terminated at a known date in the future.  That period of earning calculated to be a severance plan offset.   Employees who work up to their specific term date ( C-list) will be receiving their normal pay; then their severance pay, without a severance plan offset.  Michelle Cash is working with Pat Mackin to define the severance plan features that will govern this timing and the corresponding explanations.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Clark, Mary
Sent:	Sunday, November 25, 2001 6:49 PM
To:	Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
Cc:	Oxley, David; Cash, Michelle; James, Terrie; Denne, Karen; Johnson, Rick
Subject:	A few questions about the scripts

I have a couple of questions about the scripts that Rick Johnson sent me

1.  For A and B employees, will there be bonuses.  It's crossed out on the A script and left in the B script.
2.  In the C script:
	Please explain what a 60-day notice w/o severance plan off-set means.
	When does severance go into effect for C employees?  It's not clear in the script.

Thanks.

Mary E. Clark
Director, Internal Communications
Phone:  713-853-7325
Fax:  713-853-6790
e-mail:  mary.clark@enron.com


Until further,  it is best to avoid long positions in the morning hours that are to liquidate against the balancing market.    The downside is $1000 and the upside maybe $10.

Thanks,
JMF


I had to share.  Can you believe it, snow on September 22.

----- Forwarded by Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT on 09/22/2000 01:20 PM -----

	"Gillette Land" <gilletteland@vcn.com>
	09/22/2000 10:23 AM
	Please respond to "Gillette Land"

		 To: <Taffy.Milligan@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Early Snow in Gillette

Woke to 4" of new snow this morning and it's  currently 28 degrees here. Come
on up and we'll have a snow ball  fight!
Chuck
 - Mvc-004s.jpg
 - Mvc-002s.jpg
 - Mvc-003s.jpg
 - Mvc-001s.jpg


I attach a brief overview of the May 15 conference.

Landmark Conference. The conference, to be held on May 15 and 16, will be the
most significant conference on energy sector deregulation in Japan this year.
We expect the Japanese press to provide extensive coverage of the conference.

Enron Orchestrating. The conference is being organized by Marcus Evans
(formerly ICM), a reputable international conference organizer, and is being
orchestrated by Enron. We are driving the timing, the seminar content and the
speakers behind the scenes.

Timing. The conference is timed to coincide with the commencement of
government deliberations on further competition reforms to Japan's
electricity market. In addition, Enron Japan will have just released a
comprehensive white paper on recommended reforms to the Japanese electricity
market.

Speakers. Mr Skilling would have the first key note speech on the first day.
He would be followed by the head of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and
Industry - the Ministry responsible for the energy sector.

Other scheduled speakers include: The president of NTT; the President of
Tokyo Electric Power Corporation; a FERC Commissioner; a senior European
regulator; former Prime Minister Hashimoto, as chairman of the Natural Energy
Promotion Association; the Dean of the Tokyo University Graduate School of
Financial Engineering; and senior management from Toyota Motor Corporation
and Asahi Chemical Corporation.

Other Meetings. We would propose meetings with: the press -  one on ones
and/or, if appropriate, a press conference; senior Government officials
(Ministerial level); senior commercial relationships (Chairman/ CEO level) eg
Orix Corp., Tokyo Electric Power Corp., Itochu Corp., Hitachi Group, Kawasaki
Group.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards

Maureen McVicker
02/22/2001 01:13 AM
To: Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: CONFERENCE INFORMATION

Nick:

Steve would like you to send to him and Sherri Sera the information about the
May 15th conference.

Sherri said that Jeff Skilling might be able to make the conference.  He
needs to be back in the states on May 17th - so she will need to check on the
flights.

I'll let you know as soon as they have decided for sure.

Thanks.


I told her about it but I don't think she can make it. She called me when she
was in Calgary yesterday. Call me when you get home.

283-9232

Chris


I will print when I get in this am.  It may be that I need to use good ole Word Perfect.  If the last page you are talking about are only the instructions regarding duties of POA, then its not very important.  See you later.

K-

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Thu 11/8/2001 9:48 PM
To: Carnahan, Kathleen
Cc:
Subject:

I am having a difficult time printing the POA.  The last pages don't print and the margins are wide. Can you help?


Are you in debt? Having trouble paying it off? We can help!
We can consolidate your bills into just one monthly payment
and help achieve the following:

- Save you a lot of money by eliminating late fees
- Settle your accounts for a substantially reduced amount
- Stop creditors calling you on the phone
- Help avoid bankruptcy
- And more!

By first reducing, and then completely removing your debts,
you will be able to start fresh. Why keep dealing with the
stress, headaches, and wasted money, when you can
consolidate your debts and pay them off much sooner! To
obtain more information, with no obligations or costs,
please reply to this email, fill out the form below, and
return it to us. Your submission will be processed within
10 business days and you will be shortly contacted by one
of our informed staff. Thank you!

Full Name  :
Address    :
City       :
State      :
Zip Code   :
Home Phone :
Work Phone :
Best Time to Call   :
E-Mail Address      :
Estimated Debt Size :

**********
If this e-mail arrived to you by error, or you wish to
never receive such advertisements from our company,
please reply to this e-mail with the word REMOVE in the
e-mail subject line. We apologize for any inconveniences

ackc


I sold the Niagara/Nat Fuel back to the Central Desk for the rest of the
month.  Please take the 16,500 dt of Trco Z6 to Z6 space to 0 in Sitara for
the balance of the month.

Thanks


I will be out on vacation the week of July 3, back at the office on July
10th. My main contact will be Stella Morris at ext. 3319. My desk will be
split as follows:

Stella - NNG-Blackmarlin (onshore), Black Marlin (offshore), Amoco third
party, Centana (on & off system, storage), Eastrans

Aimee - Carthage, Tufco updates, Bridge Back

Mark McCoy - Katy Lonestar (on & offsystem)

Tom Acton - Send nominations MOPS to POPS

Please pass this to other members of your groups, thanks.

Carlos


Dear Prospective Applicant:

Thank you for your interest in the University of Chicago Graduate School of
Business Executive MBA Program.  In addition to our Executive MBA here in
Chicago, we offer 2 other Executive MBA Programs - one in Barcelona, Spain
and one in Singapore. Other part-time options in Chicago include the Evening
MBA and Weekend MBA programs. We also offer a full-time MBA program.

In today's competitive employment world, where you earn your degree has
important long-term implications for your professional growth and
advancement.  The Graduate School of Business at the University of Chicago
has a long history of excellence in M.B.A. education.  I am delighted that
you may want to be a part of this history.

In early fall, please check our web site at gsb.uchicago.edu for upcoming
information receptions about the Executive M.B.A. Program. The date of our
next entering class is July 15, 2001.

Sincerely,

Patty Keegan
Director Executive M.B.A. Program
University of Chicago Graduate School of Business


Kim,

I met Paul Y'barbo today (I have known him for ages)
and he mentioned an interview with you.

He is a very bright and capable individual and he would
be a good fit to your group.

Vince

P.S.  He looks better without the pony tail.


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
11:43 AM ---------------------------

Schang@cook-inlet.com on 09/25/2000 09:47:26 AM
To: mlenhart@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Ones that didn't make Sydney

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim, Richard J [mailto:Richard.Kim@West.Boeing.com]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 12:55 PM
To: 'mchoi@sunamerica.com'; 'schang@cook-inlet.com'
Subject: Ones that didn't make sydney

 <<BRONZE.mpg>>  <<GOLD.mpg>>  <<javelin.mpg>>  <<SILVER.mpg>>
the gold is the best

 - BRONZE.mpg
 - GOLD.mpg
 - javelin.mpg
 - SILVER.mpg


FYI

Attached is the copy of the CoU given to me by Clay yesterday on Hoegh Galleon that i was asked to get executed by OLNG and Hoegh Galleon.  I have sent the same to OLNG after Clay's signature's.  OLNG will be executing the same and sending it back to us for execution by HG.  I will courier that to you, if you could please get it executed by Hoegh Galleon.

Regards
Rajesh


John Neslage@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	02/02/2001 11:20 AM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: California ABX1-1

Ginger:

Could you please forward this to the participants of the daily California
Conference call?

Thanks

John
----- Forwarded by John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 02/02/2001 11:20 AM -----


From: Governor's Office of Emergency Services

Agency has deployed 130 engines to fire lines

SACRAMENTO - The Governor's Office of Emergency Services is working
day and night at its headquarters and in the field to rapidly deploy
additional fire crews to the Northern California fire lines.

As of now, OES has dispatched 130 state OES and local government
engines to battle numerous stubborn  blazes including the Emigrant
Gap fire in the Tahoe National Forest near Interstate-80.

At OES Headquarters, resource requests are being managed by the State

Emergency Operations Center and the Inland Region Emergency
Operations Center, which have been activated. Fire & Rescue, Law
Enforcement, Telecommunication, and Operations staff of OES are all
active in this effort at headquarters and in the field.

Emigrant Gap Fire is one of more than seven Northern California fires

being closely monitored by OES. Combined, the fires have burned
approximately 107,000 acres. All fires combined bring the total
OES-coordinated response to 26 fire engine strike teams working
107,000 acres (see chart for participating cities and counties)
alongside other local, federal and state agencies.

The local and state-owned equipment has been dispatched through
California's Fire and Rescue Mutual Aid System, administered by OES,
to assist the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection,
and federal wildland fire agencies, and local departments.  The
system is designed to ensure that additional resources are provided
to local jurisdictions whenever their own resources are committed or
insufficient for any fire or rescue operation.

Each strike team consists of five fire engines - with three to four
firefighters per engine - and one strike team leader per team.

Four of the seven fires are being battled by local firefighters
called to duty by OES under the Mutual Aid system:

EMIGRANT GAP FIRE
(20 miles west of Truckee in the Tahoe National Forest)

1 Strike Team of five OES engines from:
Grass Valley
Woodland
Delta Fire Protection District in Rio Vista
Folsom
City of Sacramento

1 OES Satellite Communication Trailer
1 OES Satellite Unit

12 Strike Teams made up of 60 Local Government Engines from:
1 Calaveras County	(5 engines)
1 Colusa and Yuba counties (5 engines)
1 Nevada County (5 engines)
2 Placer County 	(10 engines)
2 Tahoe Basin		(10 engines

from California and Nevada)
2 Sacramento County	(10 engines)
1 San Joaquin County	(5 engines)
1 Stanislaus County	(5 engines)
1 El Dorado County	(5 engines)

MODOC COMPLEX FIRE
(near Alturas)
2 Strike Teams made up of 10 Local Government Engines from:
Alameda County Team (5 engines)
Oakland
Berkeley
Alameda County
Livermore
Livermore Lab
Sonoma County Team (5 engines)
Cazadero
Cloverdale
Gold Ridge
Coast Guard at Two Rock
City of Sonoma
BLUE FIRE
(U.S. Highway 395 near Likely)
5 Strike Teams made up of 25 Local Government Engines from:
Sutter County	(5 engines)
Stanislaus County(5 engines)
Nevada County	(5 engines)
Shasta County	(5 engines)
Tulare County	(5 engines)

OBSERVATION FIRE
(U.S. 395 near Termo)
Three Strike Teams made up of 14 OES Engines
Shasta County
Weaverville
Tehama
Mt. Shasta
Quincy
Loyalton

Sutter County
Yuba City
Willows
Ft. Bragg
Colusa
Eureka

Solano County
Solano County
Benicia
Valley of the Moon
Suisun
California Medical Facility in Vacaville

1 OES Satellite Unit

For more information contact:
Eric Lamoureux at (916) 262-1843

EDIS-08-14-01 1634 PDT

---------------------------------------------------------
To update or terminate your subscription to this email service
visit our webpage at http://www.incident.com/edismail.html.

EDIS is operated by the Governor's Office of Emergency Services,
State of California. This email relay is offered by incident.com
as a public service. Because of the complexity of this system and
its dependence on other systems, we cannot be responsible for
delays or failures in transmission.
---------------------------------------------------------


I am attaching a operating lease summary which I have revised to include some
basic asset operation stuff.  I've left Lisa a voice mail with a brief
explanation of what we are doing, and asking her if she would take a look at
this from a financing "fatal flaw" standpoint, with Enron being the lessor.

I've been summoned to Nowhere North Carolina (Rocky Mount) for the remainder
of the day and tomorrow, and will be back on Friday am.

Anne, I hope this helps keep you moving.

Lisa, many, many thanks.

Kay

Kay


Victoria,

Now it is my turn to apologize for a late response.  Having said that, I have
reviewed your remarks regarding the GISB my comments are as  follows:

Section 1.2   Transactions may be negotiated orally or online.  In either
case Enron will  send a written confirmation via fax or electronic for  the
trade.  I hope this helps in clearing any confusion regarding the oral
designation in Section1.2.

Section 7.2 With regards ACH, I am waiting on a response from my accounting
dept.

Section 13.5 Concerning jurisdiction we will agree to  New York.

Please let me have your thoughts regards these issues.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


In case you haven't seen this.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001 01:42 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Fuller, Don" <DFuller@caiso.com>@caiso.com>
01/23/2001 09:37 AM

Please respond to "Sole, Jeanne" <JSole@caiso.com>
Sent by: "Happ, Susan" <SHapp@caiso.com>
To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notice: Posting of Non-Operational Generating Units

In accordance with section 6 of AB 5 which has been signed into law by the
Governor, on Thursday January 25 the ISO will begin posting on a daily basis
a list of generating units that are not operational.  This list will be
posted on the ISO website.

Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.


This is just a reminder that
timecards need to be submitted no
later than 3pm today (Friday, 2-1).
Please remember to document your holiday for January 21st
(Martin Luther King Day) as a Company Observed Holiday.
**Also don't forget to document any
vacation or discretionary holiday that you have taken. **

Thanks,
Sonia Hennessy
Enron Networks
Phone# 713-345-4858
Fax# 713-646-2443
Location:  EB3103g
sonia.hennessy@enron.com


Ken and Tori:

Thank you for your reply Ken.  The other days that could be made to work
are November 2 or October 12.  Do either of those days work logistically
for you.  I appreciate very much your willingness to help. I look
forward to hearing back. R.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Tori L. [mailto:Tori.L.Wells@ENRON.com]
Sent: September 21, 2001 5:58 PM
To: Roger Martin
Subject: Reply from Ken

Any responses to this e-mail should be sent to kenneth.lay@enron.com

Mr. Martin:

In reply to your request for Dr. Lay to speak, he has asked that I reply
to you with the following message.

"Advise that the date just doesn't work because of our Manager's
Conference but on a different date either I or one of my officers could
probably participate".

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Tori L. Wells
Executive Assistant
Office of Ken Lay
Chairman & CEO
ENRON

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Stuart,

I cannot open your attachment.

Vince Kaminski


I just saw a note that you'll speak to us -- the Washington office -- later this morning.  Quite independent from that, I actually wrote this email in my head last night as I experienced yet another sleepless early morning ...

You know this intuitively, I suspect, but I just wanted to underscore that the staff here in DC have experienced a rather stressful period.  First was the 11th, when several of us (Linda, John, Pat, Chris, Allison, Jeff Keeler and I) were all up on the Hill -- literally each of us was within a hundred yards of the Capitol building.  Our phones began ringing as wives and colleagues told us to quickly walk as far away from the Hill as we could since there were reports of more planes in the air.

Then yesterday we all piled into the ER for anthrax testing since we've been up on the Hill in the last few days.  A very long shot on that score, since none of us was in the Hart building on Monday, for cause for concern nonetheless.

I look around me and see small but discernible signs of stress.  I know I experience them at home at night.

But I just wanted to pass this on.  We're doing our jobs, but somehow it just happens that we inadvertently stumble into harm's way at precisely those moments -- when we're doing our jobs!

I grew up overseas, son of diplomats.  We we were in a country for only two years, not the usual three or four year tour -- and when we saw strained families and marriages, and increased alcohol consumption and other ways of dealing with stress ... it was simply because we lived in what they call "hardship posts."  The government understood that, and kept a special watch on you on those countries.

So, from this hardship post ...  hope this isn't out of line, but wanted to pass on my thoughts directly to you.  Maybe tonight I'll get a full night's sleep now.

Best,
Steve


Pat,
 Please note that you were able to open this mail without any loud noise.
Next time i might send something that could open with some type of noise that
might not stop even if you power off the computer.    But not this time.

 Please put me down as attending the mark-to-market presentation.  Also,
Include Stacy Dickson as an attendee.


Can get that number.  You want it pre "Blue Book" or pre AB 1890, or both.

Steven J Kean@ENRON
09/01/2000 08:27 AM
Sent by: Steven J Kean@ENRON
To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

Look at this.  Baum finally speaks up  -- way too late.
Can somebody tell me what SDG&E's energy rate was pre-dereg?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/01/2000
08:24 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ann M Schmidt                           09/01/2000 07:57 AM

To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

F.Y.I.

  California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs
  By Rebecca Smith

  09/01/2000
  The Wall Street Journal
  Page A4
  (Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  California lawmakers voted to extend modest relief to San Diego residents
burdened with
  high electricity bills and set the groundwork for faster construction of
badly needed power
  plants. They stopped short, however, of passing legislation that would roll
back retail power
  rates to levels seen prior to deregulation .

  Late Wednesday, lawmakers sent a bill to Gov. Gray Davis that limits to 6.5
cents per
  kilowatt hour the amount that small customers of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co. can be
  charged. The utility is allowed to add power-delivery and other reasonable
costs to that
  commodity price.

  The price, equivalent to a bulk power cost of $65 per megawatt hour, is far
higher than the
  average price of power for 27 of the 31 months in which California's market
has been
  deregulated. But in June and July, the average price of power obtained by
the utility from a
  state-sanctioned energy auction rose to 12 cents and 10.5 cents,
respectively, compared
  with the 2.3 cents and 2.8 cents charged in those months a year earlier.

  Passed directly through to customers,the resulting bills sparked a near
mutiny. The
  rate-cap measure applies to residential and small commercial customers, as
well as to
  schools and hospitals.

  In addition to the rate cap, which can be adjusted upward or downward by
the California
  Public Utilities Commission until December 2002, the legislature earmarked
$150 million of
  general-fund revenue, which can be used to subsidize San Diego power costs
if they greatly
  exceed the 6.5-cents-per-kilowatt-hour rate. For now, the utility would be
expected to make
  up any difference between revenue collected and the actual cost.

  Steve Baum, chairman of Sempra Energy, parent of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co., said the
  rate-cap measure is "deeply flawed" because it limits the amount prices can
rise but sets
  no floor. That means any shortfall could grow -- without a mechanism for
customers to pay
  it down -- until the end of the rate-cap period, which could last until
December 2002 or
  December 2003.

  Mr. Baum said Sempra stands to suffer an undercollection of perhaps $664
million, provided
  future prices approximate the New York Mercantile Exchange forward prices
through
  December 2002. "It's irreparably damaging to Sempra," he said because it
"creates
  tremendous uncertainty" that makes it hard for the San Diego energy company
to finance
  new projects such as a new transmission line.

  The legislature also appeared likely to approve a bill speeding up the
permit process for the
  construction of new power plants, in part by beefing up staffs of
regulatory agencies that
  review the plans.

  Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Parks, Joe
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:57 AM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.
Subject:

Tom,

How was holiday? It was nice spending time with the family for the holidays. The kids had a great time. When you get a minute, could you get Donnie's phone number at prebon, and Missy's number at APB, I would appreciate it.

Thanks

Joe


I have a meeting in Cuero at 10:00 am this Saturday that will last only an
hour or so.  Other than that, we have no reason to go.  Maybe you could fly
me to that?
If so, I'll need to ask Melissa.  She would not haev to go in that case and
can stay and recuperate.


Thank you, I have received your fax and directed it to our contract
administrator.  I agree, it should be billed from Enron North America
(formerly ECT).  I am pushing to cure this error this week.  I will keep you
informed of our progress.   Thanks for your patience.

Best Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Attached is the latest version of the Enron North America Legal phone list.
Please advise is any further revisions are required.


I have written a C++ code to do the following: For a given curve,
the code will filter out the seasonal factor.  It then fits the deseasoned
curve to a smooth function of the form  f(t)=a+A/(t+B)c, with 0<c<.5. ?The curve fitting is achieved by using Conjugate Gradient method. ??As Tanya pointed out, this form of function ensures that  ?f(t)2*t - f(t-1)2*(t-1) >0, which is useful in calculating forward-forward ?vol. ?The outputs are season patterns (2 different patterns are allowed)?and the smoothed curve.  One can then calculate forward-forward vol?from the smoothed curve and superimpose the seasonal factors back?onto the curve.??This procedure is not useful for VaR calcuation. However, I believe it ?is useful for other situations which require the knowledge of  seasonal ?forward-forward vols.  For example, in power plant valuation and?credit exposure simulations, it would reflect the reality more closely?if we add seasonality to our forward-forward vol in simulating the forward?prices. ??Attached are the spreadsheet and XLL file. I will forward the C code if?any of you is interested. ??Alex??


i might have tickets


Will do.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com [mailto:Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 2:43 PM
To: David.Yeres@CliffordChance.com
Subject: Re:

David:

It was good to see you also.  I am only available on the 14th.  I would
like you to come to Enron and talk about the audit and certain key
provisions in the trading agreements with the top trading lawyers.  Give
Mark Taylor a call at 713-853-7459; he is GC of the financial trading.

Regards,

Mark

David.Yeres@Clifford

Chance.com                  To:
mark.e.haedicke@enron.com
cc:
Mark.Harding@CliffordChance.com, Claude.Brown@CliffordChance.com,
04/09/2001 04:40 PM
Kersten.Schenck@CliffordChance.com
Subject:

Mark, it was good to see you Thursday.  My next visit to Houston is
scheduled for May 14 and 15.  I will be making a presentation concerning
the
legal consequences of market abuse in electricity trading to a Risk
Magazine
Conference on the 14th.  As we discussed last week, I would, if you wish,
be
pleased to speak to your colleagues on the same subject during my visit.  I
would also be pleased to discuss the contract audit issues, focusing on the
key provisions that have been, or we expect to be, critical from a
financial
or reputational perspective.  In that regard, it would be helpful to
discuss
Enron' experience with agreements/provisions before finalizing my remarks.
Perhaps you could identify someone on your staff with whom I may speak.

Best regards.

David Yeres
Clifford Chance Rogers & Wells LLP
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Tel:  (212) 878-8075
Fax: (212) 878-8027
Email: david.yeres@cliffordchance.com

*******

This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or
otherwise protected from disclosure.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and
any attachment from your system.  If you are not the intended recipient you
must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any
other person.

For further information about Clifford Chance please see our website at
http://www.cliffordchance.com or refer to any Clifford Chance office.


Claude,

Could you please fax this to Heather?  You might want to call her to make
sure she is still at McCary's office.

Thanks,

Kay


Hello-
This email is a reconfirmation that you have received the  speaker package I
have sent you last month regarding the above titled training  course. If you
have not received it, please contact me ASAP and I will send you  all the
information needed for the training. Also, please remember to hand in  the
following:
Your biographical details
Speaker checklist
copy of your presentation for our  documentation printed materials (please
keep in mind that you will need to bring  your presentation with you at the
training, as we will not have it  pre-downloaded).
Please keep in mind the deadline of July 27 and please call or  email me with
any questions you have.
?
Regards,
Amy Lamonsoff
Training coordinator
?
T (212) 925-1864x148
F (212) 925-7585
alamonsoff@watersinfo.com
?
Risk Waters Group
270 Lafayette Street, Suite 700
New York, NY 10012


Here is the latest, with comments from everyone.  MDS


Regarding Willims,  I  left a phone message for Carol Milanowski  with
Williams  regarding a Master  Agreement and their objection to our GTC.

I  have and completed revisions as suggested by Russell Diamond to credit
sections of the Williams' draft  previously sent in March of 1999.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Please, cancel my membership.

Wincenty (Vince) Kaminski


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 5:31 PM
To:	Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Lebeau, Maria; Escamilla, Albert; Lebrocq, Wendi; Global Emerging Businesses; Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Curry, Ken
Subject:	EOL and Clickpaper Approvals for 10-24-01

Please see attached.

Regards,

Wendi Lebrocq
3-3835


I believe Kodak just doesn't support the USB connection very well.  I tried
the other connection and it works great.  I pulled all the tractor pictures
off the camera with no problem.  I still have not seen a photo as clear as
the very first one Chance pulled up of the family reunion though.

All the tractor pictures are a little fuzzy.


Congratulation Jeff!

I am the Assistant to Gregory T. Adams in the New Jersey Office.  I would
like to thank you and Ken Lay for graciously  giving of yourself and  your
time during the EES Holiday Weekend.  It was an experience my son, who
attended with me, will never forget.  Enron is a Class Act !  Again,
Congratulations Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Angela Williams/HOU/EES on 12/13/2000
09:43 AM ---------------------------

Ken Lay@ENRON
12/13/2000 06:01 AM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Succession Plan

It is my great pleasure to announce that the Board has accepted my
recommendation to appoint Jeff Skilling as chief executive officer, effective
at the time of their next board meeting on February 12, 2001.  Jeff will also
retain his duties as president and chief operating officer.  I will continue
as chairman of the Board and will remain at Enron, working with Jeff on the
strategic direction of the company and our day-to-day global operations.

Jeff will assume the role at a time when the company is hitting on all
cylinders and is positioned for phenomenal growth.  He is clearly ready for
the job, and after 15 years as CEO of this great company, I,m ready for a
somewhat different role.

Our succession plan has been clear for some time.  This has afforded Jeff and
me the freedom to combine our strengths toward building a company that
continues to exceed everyone,s expectations, including our own.  We look
forward to furthering that relationship as Jeff expands his role.

There are no plans for any other changes in our management team nor broad
shifts in strategy and direction.

Please join me in congratulating Jeff.  I look forward to a great 2001.


Please remove me from your email list.

don.baughman@enron.com


Joseph Parks, Jr.:

The Performance Assessment System (PAS) indicates that you have not submitted your self assessment yet.

In order to complete your self assessment, please log onto the PAS system via <https://hrglobal.enron.com>. In the My Reviews section, click Edit Self Assessment and submit your self assessment.

This message has been sent by an automated system. If you feel you have received this message in error, please contact the HRGIM Help Desk at hrgim@enron.com.


Edd, looks like the gas industry restructuring thing is going to bring me to
SF next Tues. thru Thurs., then May 29 thru June 2.  I had thought about
going for the whole Memorial Day weekend, but Bill's going to be in Boston
the following weekend, so I now think that June 3 - 4 would be the better
weekend for me to hang out in Cali.  It's all sort of loosey-goosey anyway
because the judge has not announced the order in which witnesses will be
presented.  I think she forgets some of us are from out of town!  Makes it
really hard to plan.  I'll know for sure by the 25th.  Thank goodness for
refundable airline tickets.  Anyway, are going to be around that 1st weekend
of June?  And -- might you be available for dinner next Tuesday or
Wednesday?  These guys like to talk business well into the evening hours, but
my interest starts to wane near suppertime and I could probably make excuses
and leave.

Bill and I took a whirlwind trip to Arizona a couple of weekends ago.  He was
in Bullhead City, of all places, where his uncle has a vacation home.  I
joined him a few days later in Vegas.  Luckily he had been to Laughlin 2
nights in a row and had gotten blackjack out of his system.  We set out for
Sedona but first had to stop at Hoover Dam, then a diner in Kingman (on Route
66 of course).  Stayed a couple of nights in Sedona, where we climbed lots of
rocks (which we later found out were protected nature preserve areas -- oops)
and got real dusty and sunburned.  Then we drove up to the Grand Canyon and
hung out at the South Rim.  Actually, we climbed down Bright Angel Trail &
back up, then drove straight to the Las Vegas airport, from which we took the
redeye so Bill could make it to his trial the next day.    I would really
love to spend more time in the Grand Canyon -- maybe not this fall, but the
next.

Ciao fo' now, and lots of soul

S.


Carrie:  sounds good.  We can meet anytime between 1:00 and 4:00.  Just let
me know.  Thanks.


Hi Avram.  Meet Rory, Prentice's brother and computer guru-type.  Rory and I talked a little bit about what you're looking for, so I thought I'd just go ahead and facilitate a little chat room here.  Avram, could you explain one more time to Rory exactly what it is that you're looking for, just to make sure that I've accurately and adequately described the situation?  Rory has some ideas.

Best,
Jeff


Apologies but the meeting is going to be on Dec. 5th at 9 AM in San
Francisco.  This date should be pretty darned firm.

Best,
Jeff

	Melissa Cortez <mcortez@govadv.com>
	11/15/2000 05:35 PM

		 To: Susan.J.Mara@enron.com
		 cc: Lysa.Akin@enron.com, Richard.Shapiro@enron.com, Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com,
Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com, Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com,
Joseph.Alamo@enron.com, MBD <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Harry.Kingerski@enron.com,
Marcie.Milner@enron.com, Karen.Denne@enron.com, James.D.Steffes@enron.com,
Sue.Nord@enron.com, Paul.Kaufman@enron.com, Marcia.A.Linton@enron.com,
Ginger.Dernehl@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: California Legislative Meeting in San Francisco

Hedy is out of town until the 27th.  I can't confirm anything yet, but the
30th looks better.  I can give ger a call
tomorrow, but may not be able to confirm until she returns.

Melissa

Susan.J.Mara@enron.com wrote:

> The 29th and 30th are the ISO Board meeting days -- if I have to pick, I
> guess the 30th would be better
>
>
>                     MBD
>                     <MDay@GMSSR.c        To:     Lysa.Akin@enron.com
>                     om>                  cc:     Susan.J.Mara@enron.com,
Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com,
>                                          Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com,
Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com,
>                     11/15/2000           Joseph.Alamo@enron.com, MBD
<MDay@GMSSR.com>, Harry.Kingerski@enron.com,
>                     10:19 AM             Marcie.Milner@enron.com,
Karen.Denne@enron.com,
>                                          James.D.Steffes@enron.com,
mcortez@govadv.com, Sue.Nord@enron.com,
>                                          Paul.Kaufman@enron.com,
Marcia.A.Linton@enron.com,
>                                          Ginger.Dernehl@enron.com
>                                          Subject:     RE: California
Legislative Meeting in San Francisco
>
>
> 29th and 30th are both ok with me.  Mike Day
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard.Shapiro@enron.com [mailto:Richard.Shapiro@enron.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 5:34 PM
> To: Lysa.Akin@enron.com
> Cc: Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com;
> Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com; Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com;
> Joseph.Alamo@enron.com; mday@gmssr.com; Harry.Kingerski@enron.com;
> Marcie.Milner@enron.com; Karen.Denne@enron.com;
> James.D.Steffes@enron.com; mcortez@govadv.com; Sue.Nord@enron.com;
> Paul.Kaufman@enron.com; Marcia.A.Linton@enron.com;
> Ginger.Dernehl@enron.com
> Subject: Re: California Legislative Meeting in San Francisco
> Importance: High
>
> TUESDAY DOES NOT WORK- THIS WAS PREVIOUSLY COMMUNICATED- MEETING NEEDSTO BE
> EITHER THE 29TH OR, PREFERABLY THE 30TH. I INTEND TO BE PRESENT AND CANNOT
> BE THERE ON THE 28TH.
>
> Lysa Akin@ECT
> 11/14/2000 06:52 PM
>
> To:   Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
>       Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph
>       Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, mday@gmssr.com, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron,
>       Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron, James D
>       Steffes/NA/Enron, mcortez@govadv.com, Sue Nord/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
>       Shapiro/NA/Enron
> cc:   Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron, Ginger
>       Dernehl/NA/Enron
>
> Subject:  California Legislative Meeting in San Francisco
>
> Please be advised that I have scheduled the above referenced meeting as
> follows:
>
> Date:     Tuesday, November 28th
> Time:     10:30am - 3:30pm Pacific
> Where:    San Francisco Office
>
> Most of you "penciled in" this appointment when I spoke to you, please make
> plans to attend!!
>
> At this time, Paul would prefer to keep this as an internal GA meeting with
> our outside lobbyists.  At this time we are not inviting the Enron Business
> units to attend, but please feel free to invite anyone else in the GA group
> you feel should attend.  HOWEVER, if you invite someone else, please advise
> me so that we can ensure we have adequate space in San Francisco to
> accommodate everyone.  Thanks!
>
> Melissa Cortez - please forward to Scott AND Hedy.
>
> Jim Steffes & Marcia Linton - I am aware that Jim is on vacation the week
> of the 27th.  In the event that he can participate via teleconference, I
> will forward a dial in number by the end of the week.
>
> Lysa Akin
> 503/464-7927


Dale,

I have passed on the information you gave me but you have to realize that
I acted just as a go-between. I shall be glad to remind our new business unit
about your proposal. I have already asked a few times.

I shall be traveling this week, Wed - Fri. I shall be back in the office on
Monday.

Vince

"Dale Nesbitt" <dale.nesbitt@marketpointinc.com> on 06/06/2000 02:03:18 AM
To: "Vincent Kaminski" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Follow up

Vince:

Just wanted to make sure you know we are still vitally interested in getting
together with you and the key Enron people.  Thanks so much for all your
help.  I understand how busy you and the new person are, but I hope you are
interested enough to find a slot for us.  I think it will benefit you as
well as us.

Dale


For 3:00 meeting with Danny.