Well, get out there and weed, then.   Can't take Annie (too short a trip).
I'm pretty sure that we'll be there.  Make tee times for 9 am?  You can wait
till we see you to pay.  They did charge corkage---just a nice, not too
expensive place.

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	05/31/2001 12:49 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Prentice @
Berkeley" <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers
<PSellers@pacbell.net>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Well...

There are a few pesky little weeds around some - not all - the tomatoes.
Lots around the melons, some in the herbs and flowers.  So you are not
taking Annie with you??  Please scout around for Liz Whiting's car keys.
They were in her purse and she can't find them now.  Look under the beds
etc. upstairs if you would please.

It had to be more than $50 per person!!!  Did they not charge the
corkage????????  Shall I mail you a check or wait till you are in  Napa?  We
would love to play golf Sunday - I will make a time if you are sure you will
be there - what time would you like??

That shirt?????????  Puh-leez.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:34 AM
To: Nancy Sellers
Cc: 'Jeff Dasovich'; Prentice Sellers; Prentice @ Berkeley
Subject: Re: Well...

Puh-leez.  We did the plastic and the rocks to avoid weeding.  How can
there be any weeding?  Unfortunately we can't stop by on the way up, but
likely on the way back, which may be Saturday night.  If so, do you guys
wan't to play golf on Sunday morning?  (Prentice is leaving with her pals
today, and I'm heading up sometime tomorrow.)

Dinner was exactly $50/person.  Thanks for bringing the wine----my shirt
loved it.

Best,
Jeff

                    Nancy Sellers

                    <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo        To:     "'Jeff Dasovich'"

                    ndavi.com>
<Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>, "Prentice @ Berkeley"

<PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers
                    05/31/2001 09:20 AM            <PSellers@pacbell.net>

                                                   cc:

                                                   Subject:     Well...

Just in from watering the west 40.  I think this is going to be our best
year ever - lookin' good, lookin' good.  However, there is some serious
weeding that someone needs to do!!!

I am presuming you guys are stopping in Napa before your dome trek (which
is
why I thought I could give you a check immediately!).  Is that the case?
If
so, I hope you can join us in a nummy little repast!  If not, I will put a
check in the mail when you let me know the amount.  Unlike some, I always
carry my checkbook with me!

Those were incredibly beautiful knives that you guys gave Cameron!

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


Steve,

I am most disheartened to hear that Dale Neuner regards my previous
conversation with he and Mark Taylor as the justification for why EOL cannot
accomodate  GPG pipeline capacity transactions.

During the discussion in Mark's office, Dale explained that currently all EOL
users can run reports and see all the details of transactions.  As currently
structured this would mean that any EOL user, including ENA, would be able to
run a report to see detail behind bids on pipeline capacity.  Obviously this
would be a problem under the marketing affiliate rules.  We discussed three
possible ways to address this:

Add security such that ENA/EES users cannot run reports on pipeline bid
data.  I understood leaving the meeting that this might be technically
difficult or expensive.
Exclude pipeline data from the reporting feature altogether.  Here the story
was that while this was not necessarily difficult, EOL could not make any
changes before version 2 was ready.  The impression was that this would be
possible after version 2.
Erect procedural firewalls.  Mark Taylor suggested that perhaps we could
inform all ENA and EES personnel that the company has a policy that prevents
them from running reports on GPG data.  This probably isn't a good long-run
solution, but we all agreed that it might serve as a bridge measure.  This
approach is supported by the fact that Enron Networks has already entered
into a confidentiality agreement with GPG.

I left the meeting thinking that one or all of these options was feasible and
have not had any correspondence to the contrary since the meeting.


Team:

Here's a list of things that I came up with that I believe we need to
prioritize and act on.  I'd like to discuss it with you during our meeting on
Friday.  Please think about it this week and let me know what I've forgotten
- or any other ideas you might have.  I've also attached the beginnings (very
rough - needs a LOT of work still) of a business plan.  Please review it and
let me know what you think.  Here's the list:

1.  Finish business plan - what are our goals?  How do we achieve them most
efficiently? etc.
2.  Review current coverage strategy, i.e. who are we calling, how often,
what have results been, etc.
3.  Determine exactly who our key targets should be (most likely industrial
in my opinion).
4.  Get our marketing materials in order:
 a.  QSE pitchbook; and
 b.  Enron/Risk management pitchbook.
5.  Conduct marketing seminars (if it seems like a good idea and we think it
will bear fruit):
 a.  list of invitees;
 b.  agenda; and
 c.  organization, i.e. who speaks, where, how many , etc.
6.  Manage current deals - i.e. how often should we have group meetings? is
our current hot list accurate? what do we have on the horizon? etc.
7.  Recruit analyst (assoc?).
8.  Recruit mid-marketer.
9.  Establish and maintain liaze with services desk.
10.  Coordinate with financial products group.

Thanks for you help folks.

DTT


Thank you for your e-mail with the draft of the amendment to the fuel
supply agreement.  I disagree that the amendment has nothing to do with the
1996 letter.  It is correct that the 1996 letter was superseded by the
amended and restated fuel supply but the situation created by the 1996 letter
was not contemplated in the amended and restated fuel supply.  The lenders
were not given a copy of the 1996 letter until recently and naturally asked
to be in the same position created by the 1996 letter which was not
contemplated in the amended and restated fuel supply.  Notwithstanding the
lenders strong case, I am still trying to argue this and many other issues
and there is a slight possibility we may be able to convince the lenders they
do not need this document.

We will continue to do our best to protect Enron's interests (at all levels)
in this highly complex and difficult financing.  As always, constructive
criticism and suggestions to improve our work are very much appreciated.

I will keep you informed of further developments

Thank you

FPL

Dan J Hyvl@ECT
12/07/2000 05:28 PM
To: Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ermes Melinchon/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Amendment to Fuel Supply

Attached is the revised amendment quickly redrafted in  an attempt to assist
PQPC.  The amendment has nothing to do with the 1996 letter which was totally
superseded by the new fuel supply arrangements.  It is strictly an
accommodation to PQPC without the benefit of any consideration to EPOS.

	Doug Leach
	12/05/2000 08:17 AM

		 To: Francisco Pinto Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ermes
Melinchon/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Amendment to Fuel Supply

Why is this necessary when we just executed a reduced price fuel supply
contract with PQP LLC and we are in the process of trying to sell the asset
and transfer the fuel contract to the new buyer and Glencore?

To: Doug Leach@ECT
cc: Dan J Hyvl@ECT, Ermes Melinchon/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Amendment to Fuel Supply

Doug:

Following our conversation of last week, attached is the draft of the
amendment to the fuel supply for your review and approval.  As you may
recall, this document became necessary after we became aware of the letter
agreement dated August 12, 1996.  If you have any questions, please give me a
call, otherwise please let me know you are okay with it so that I can send it
to the lenders for their review and approval.

many thanks

FPL


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001
03:36 PM ---------------------------
From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 02/21/2001 12:07 PM CST
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian
Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES,
David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don
Black/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES,
Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Greg
Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Kristin
Walsh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcia A
Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, mday@gmssr.com, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael Tribolet/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Mike
Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron,
Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Johnston/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Shelley
Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance
Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron@ENRON,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Piazze/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Daily California Call Moved to Weekly Call

As a reminder, the daily call on California has ended.

We will now have a single weekly call on Monday at 10:30 am Houston time.

Updates will be provided through e-mail as required.

Jim Steffes


Minor edits as shown.  Otherwise, looks good.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/02/2001 04:20 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Advisory group bullets


I just called Ben.  He had mentioned the Four Seasons yesterday.  I'm waiting
for him to call me back.

Kay

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 04/18/2001 10:55:37 AM
To: "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Lunch

Donde?  What do you have in mind?

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Please do.  I"m on a long conference call.

Thanks,

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/12/2001 04:34:15 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: Stephen.Thome@enron.com, "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

Kay:

E-mail delivery sounds fine.  Per the letter agreement, we need to submit
the final form of the Turbine Contract and a blacklined version of same
reflecting changes from the form attached to the letter agreement.   I have
assumed that the version to be attached to the letter agreement is the
version #3 that you sent by e-mail on April 3 @12:45 to Greg Lang et al., as
I believe this was the last draft circulated prior to execution of the
letter agreement.

Would you prefer to send these documents to Greg directly or would you like
for me to handle this?  It appears that the blackline attached to this
e-mail is the appropriate blackline (comparison of version 3 to version 4),
so please confirm and let me know if you would like me to send those
documents along to Greg.  Our transmittal will officially reference that
"pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Letter Agreement, we have enclosed...."

Please advise as to handling.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King;& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>
;

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 4:06 PM
To: ccampbell@kslaw.com; jkeffer@kslaw.com
Cc: Stephen.Thome@enron.com
Subject: RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

YIPPEEE.

Carolyn,  I think we should tender by email.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/12/2001 04:04
PM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ps.ge.com on 04/12/2001 03:50:04 PM

To:   pthompson@akllp.com, kay.mann@enron.com
cc:   kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com

Subject:  RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

I've reviewed the agreement and we are back in "sync".  Unless Kent has
anything to add, we're good to go on this end.
-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Peter J. [mailto:pthompson@akllp.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 11:13 AM
To: Kay Mann (E-mail); Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)
Cc: Pipitone, Paul
Subject: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

Attached please find the latest Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement (second
document below), as well as a blackline (first document below) showing
changes made to the version circulated on April 2.  This version
contains Lee's changes to Exhibits A, A-1, B and B-1.  No changes were
made to the Maximum Liability Amount, Purchase Amount or Unit Liability
Amount. Power System Stabilizers are included in the scope.  To complete
the agreement, we will need to insert the date of execution and Exhibit
H-2.
 <<Comparison of Salmon Energy Agreement, Versions 3 to 4.DOC>>
<<Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 4.DOC>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


If you have some time, I'd like to pick your brain about this matter.


do we leave one trade only docs off the monthly list so as to not confuse
people?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Panus, Stephanie
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 9:09 AM
To: Bowen, Bob; Adams, Laurel; Guillen, Andrea; Hunter, Larry Joe; Heaney,
Gordon; Aguayo, Janie; Bailey, Derek; Anderson, Diane; Tackett, Scott;
Cisneros, Celeste; Brewer, Julie; Fischer, Jason; Garcia, Jorge; Hundl,
Kimberly; Ornelas, Bianca; Murphy, Melissa Ann; Seib, Dianne; Theriot, Kim;
Bell, Jean; Cason, Sharen; Whalen, Melinda; Piwetz, Stephanie; Rodriguez,
Melissa; Williams, Tiffany; Bradford, William S.; Brackett, Debbie R.;
Rohauer, Tanya; Reves, Brant; Diamond, Russell; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq,
Wendi; Sacks, Edward; Espinoza, Veronica; Gonzalez, Veronica; Radous, Paul;
Williams, Jason R (Credit); Johnson, Rudwell; Vanek, Darren; Rajaram, Aparna;
Conwell, Wendy; Curry, Ken; Moran, Tom; Mendoza, Nidia; Brown, Angela Y.;
Ngo, Tracy; Landry, Shemeika S.; Otto, Randy; Colbert, Marilyn; Ellstrom,
Diane; Shivers, Lynn; Hare, Bill D.; Reeves, Leslie; Moore, Jason; Schott,
Samuel; Campos, Anthony; Rodriguez, Bernice; Neuner, Dale; Lambert, Karen;
Davis, Frank L.; Southard, Carrie; Ebow, Amber; Richardson, Stacey; Lees,
Lisa; Gerard, Camille; Landau, Georgi; Johnson, Cheryl; Sever, Stephanie;
Crawford, Sharon; Sietzema, Linda; Hendry, Brent; Shackleton, Sara; Taylor,
Mark; Bailey, Susan; Cook, Mary; Jones, Tana; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Nelson,
Cheryl; Sayre, Frank; Davis, Angela; Keiser, Holly; Heard, Marie
Subject: Lakeside Feeders Ltd., by and through its division, Lakeside Packers

We have received an executed financial Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   May 1, 2001

Enron Entity:   Enron Canada Corp.

Counterparty:   Lakeside Feeders Ltd., by and through its division, Lakeside
Packers

Transactions Covered:  THIS ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT CAN BE USED BY COUNTERPARTY
    FOR ONE TRADE ONLY.  NO MORE DEALS ARE TO BE DONE UNDER
    THIS AGREEMENT.

Confirming Entity:  None

Governing Law:   None

Copies will be distributed.

Stephanie Panus


Dan, let me know if these changes are okay with you.  Thanks, Janet
---------------------- Forwarded by Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000
04:33 PM ---------------------------

	From:  James I Ducote                           10/04/2000 03:07 PM

To: jwallis@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Enfolio Contract with CPS

---------------------- Forwarded by James I Ducote/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000
03:01 PM ---------------------------

"Pfister, Christian W." <CWPfister@cps-satx.com> on 10/04/2000 02:21:52 PM
To: "'James.I.Ducote@enron.com'" <James.I.Ducote@enron.com>
cc: "Mc Whirter, Daniel D." <DDMcWhirter@cps-satx.com>
Subject: Enfolio Contract with CPS

Sorry that you did not receive my e-mail of Sept. 9th with the attached
addendum.  We have reviewed the draft of the Enfolio Master Firm
Purchase/Sales Agreement and find it generally to be a good agreement.  The
attached file contains an addendum with three changes that we would like to
make to the contract.  The first item is merely a grammatical clarification.
The second relates to the fact that we typically do not get the annual
report out within 120 days.  This year, we got it out in about 180 days.
The third item relates to a requirement that we must follow as a municipal
corporation.

Although the purchase process has not yet been approved by executive
management, we wanted to get the contractual issues resolved so that the
agreement could be immediately put in place once the approval occurs.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at (210)353-3725 if you have an
questions about the addendum.

 <<Enfolio Addendum.doc>>

Thank you,

Christian W. Pfister
Contract Administration, CPS

 - Enfolio Addendum.doc


Andy:
Just a couple of quick items that need to be addressed.  First, what happens
if the delta of the option is greater than the size of the hedge offered on
EOL?  Second, what strike are straddles traded at.  Are they set at the
nearest 5 cent interval or are they mid-market of the EOL quote?


My apologies, there has been a slight change in the dial information that is listed below.  Please note changed items in red:

Date:		Weekly on Friday's

Time:		10:30 AM (CST)

Number:	1-800-745-1000 (domestic#)
		801-977-0648 (int'l)
		8533407 (participant passcode)

Thanks!

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dernehl, Ginger
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 9:58 AM
To:	Alamo, Joseph; Allegretti, Daniel; Allen, Joe; Alvarez, Ray; Assad, Sergio; Assaf, Lisa; Ausenhus, Kara; Barnes, Lynnette; Bellas, Kirsten; Bestard, Jose; Binns, Darran; Bolton, Scott; Boston, Roy; Braz, Gisele; Buerger, Rubena; Burns, Stephen; Canovas, Guillermo; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Comnes, Alan; Connor, Joe; Cooney, Carolyn; Cooper, Adam N; Crowther, Mark; Dasovich, Jeff; Davies, Philip; Dawson, Paul; Decker, Larry; Dernehl, Ginger; Dressler, Jean; Elms, Nick; Fitzgibbon, Tom; Floris, Vinio; Frank, Robert; Fromer, Howard; Fulton, Donna; Gottfredson, Bryan; Grimes, Michael; Guerrero, Janel; Haizmann, Jan; Hamilton, Allison; Hardy Jr, John; Hartfield, Rita; Hawkins, Bernadette; Hemstock, Robert; Hennemeyer, Paul; Hetrick, Nancy; Hoatson, Tom; Huertas, Alfredo; Hueter, Barbara A.; Hughes, Llewelyn; Hunter, Bevin; Huson, Margaret; Ibrahim, Amr; Imai, Makiko; Kaufman, Paul; Kean, Steven J.; Keenan, Amber; Keene, Patrick; Kimura, Takashi; Kingerski, Harry; Kishigami, Kikumi; Knight, Laurie; Landwehr, Susan M.; Lassere, Donald; Lawner, Leslie; Lawrence, Linda L.; Leibman, Lara; Leonardo, Sam; Levy, Alberto; Lindberg, Susan; Linnell, Elizabeth; Long, Chris; Mara, Susan; Maurer, Luiz; McVicker, Maureen; Migden, Janine; Milano, Pamela; Miller, Terri; Montovano, Steve; Nersesian, Carin; Neustaedter, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Nord, Sue; Noske, Linda J.; Novosel, Sarah; O'connell, Earlene; Ogenyi, Gloria; Palmer, Germain; Perez, Carmen; Perez, Gus; Perrino, Dave; Petrochko, Mona L.; Pharms, Melinda; Reis, Jose Lucio; Reyna, Margo; Rishe, Frank; Rizzo, Helen; Roan, Michael; Robertson, Linda; Robinson, Marchris; Rodriquez, Andy; Ryall, Jean; Sampaio, Fred; Shapiro, Richard; Shelk, John; Shortridge, Pat; Staines, Dan; Steffes, James D.; Stephens, Sharonda; Stransky, Joan; Stroup, Kerry; Stubbings, Randy; Styles, Peter; Sullivan, Kathleen; Sullivan, Lora; Thome, Jennifer; Tiberi, Fino; Twiggs, Thane; Van Biert, Teun; Walton, Steve; Warner, Geriann; Watanabe, Mika; Wood, Doug; Yeung, Charles; Yoho, Lisa
Subject:	Global Government Affairs Weekly Conference Call

Global Government Affairs will have a weekly call that will take place as follows:

Date:		Weekly on Friday's

Time:		10:30 AM (CST)

Number:	1-800-745-1000 (domestic#)
		614-410-1515 (int'l)
		8533407 (participant passcode)
		7751 (host code - Rick only)

Thanks!

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160


Citizens Utilities is in the process of selling off all of its
non-telecommunications businesses throughout North America.  One of their
principal assets, Louisiana Gas Service (LGS) is one of those companies
recently sold by Citizens.  LGS provided gas control and operations services
to other non-LGS companies, including the Citizens Utilities LDC assets in
Arizona.  With the consummation of the sale of LGS, Citizens has told me
confidentially that they have no reasonable way of operating the
interconnect, metering and 1.5 mile lateral pipeline facilities that
interconnects TW and EPNG to the recently constructed Griffith Energy Power
Plant.   Therefore, Citizens is looking to possibly have a 3rd party provide
contract operations services under an operating agreement.  TW has been asked
in writing by Citizens to consider making a proposal to operate these
facilities.

Does TW have an interest in providing contract operations services for
Citizens?  In a related legal/regulatory question, does TW have the authority
to conduct contract services on behalf of others, or would we have to perform
these services as a separate legal entity?  If we do, does this present an
affiliate problem for us if we "share" operating employees?  If these
threshold questions can be accommodated, and TW is not only able to provide
contract operations services for Citizens, but has a commercial desire to do
so, what would we charge Citizens for this service?  Although it would appear
at first blush to be a relatively simple matter to operate these facilities,
remember that Citizens will be receiving gas (potentially) from both TW and
EPNG simultaneously, presenting not only a challenge to balance pressure
between the pipes, but to account for and reconcile deliveries and receipts
from both pipes as well as the plant site.

Although I'm the principal commercial representative for Citizens as regards
transportation matters, I'm certainly willing to step out of the middle of
this negotiation if Operations desires to handle it themselves.  I will be
happy to provide you a copy of the brief 1/2 page letter Citizens sent to me
on the 17th soliciting TW's interest.   Given the relatively short lead time
until LGS operations is sold, Citizens has requested expedited
consideration.  Please let me know how you want to proceed.  Call if you have
any questions.


If you would like for me to order a calendar for 2002, please submit your preference.

Thanks in advance,

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


===========================================================
***********************************************************
NEW! Would you like to receive this message in HTML instead
of plain text?
***********************************************************

Try the enhanced version of our market report mail. Get the
latest report, index data and headlines. Sign in and select
"HTML" http://moneycentral.msn.com/Comcenter/options.asp?returnURL=/Comcenter/email.asp
===========================================================

The following data is best viewed in a Fixed Width font such as Courier.

Leading Indexes(as of 11/19/2001 11:00 hours ET)   http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/market/leading.asp

Quotes supplied by Standard & Poor's Comstock and delayed at least 20 minutes. Data Source:  http://www.spcomstock.com

Name                                LEVEL       CHANGE      %Change
--------                            --------    -------     -------
Dow Jones Industrial Average        9,906.92    +39.93      +0.40%
S & P 500 Index                     1,141.88    +3.23       +0.28%
Nasdaq Composite Index              1,910.66    +12.08      +0.64%
Amex Composite Index                794.15      -4.55       -0.57%
Russell 2000 Index                  453.17      +1.86       +0.41%

To personalize this e-mail with your own investments, sign up to add your portfolio.

http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/alerts/ppemail.asp

** MSN Money Community **

Discuss the hot topic of the day on the message boards, Chat with CNBC personalities and investing experts, or post a question for one of our other financial experts.

http://money.msn.com/community/highlights.asp

----------------------------------------------

Market Summary (as of 11/19/2001 11:00 hours ET)  http://moneycentral.msn.com/articles/common/summary.asp

Dow turns bullish
Provided by MSN Money

The Dow pushed its way into official bull market territory this morning, up some 20% from its recent lows, notes CNBC's Joe Kernen. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq tagged along, both climbing this morning. The story is similar overseas, with stocks in London, Hong Kong and Japan higher. <P>
The news this morning was only mildly positive, which apparently is all it takes for the market these days. October housing starts fell, but not as much as expected. Home improvement retailer Lowe's topped expectations. And two oil companies are merging. But the employment outlook remains lousy.

Full day's coverage: http://moneycentral.msn.com/articles/common/summary.asp

==============================================================
Today's update brought to you by MSN Money -- The best place to invest.
http://moneycentral.msn.com

If you would like to unsubscribe from the MSN Money Market Summary Email go to http://money.msn.com/investor/invsub/alerts/ppemail.asp or reply to this message and type "Unsubscribe" in the subject line of the message. Thank you.
==============================================================

This email was sent to:  kim.ward@enron.com


I can attest to the fact that you hit the bulls-eye, dead center, sir, with
your description.  But again, the message is great, and his written stuff, I
think, is effective.  Your decision to help fund his participation was an
extremely good one in the end.

Best,
Jeff

	Mark Schroeder@ECT
	11/21/2000 10:29 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: littlechild

As far as "spicing up", you probably saw him at his sauciest.  I only
promised that he would be "taciturn", and I am sure that I did not
oversell!   thanks  mcs

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 21/11/2000 10:28 CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: littlechild

Forgive the tardiness.  As soon as I come up from air from completing a tidal
wave of performance reviews, I'll give a full report.  Bottom line:  His
message is a very good one.  His delivery could use a tad spicing up,
however.  Unfortunately, when I was free, he was in meetings, and vice
versa.  So we never got to sit down and chat.  I'll fill you in more soon.

Best,
Jeff

	Mark Schroeder@ECT
	11/17/2000 11:52 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: littlechild

how did the good professor do?   thanks  mcs


As a follow up to the meeting with AA on Friday, April 14, Richard and I
discussed with AA (Sorrells, Grutzmacher and Brown) how the monthly BRM
controller's meeting deliverables and database deliverables should be
prepared.  The proposal I think we should recommend to AA is the following:

Opening and closing meeting with front line managers and discussion of all
items, regardless of priority ratings (high, medium, low)
Report generated to the Business Risk Managers at the monthly controller
meeting in the "Project Doorstep" style, incorporating existing controls and
observations/action steps to be taken on the critical issues (those with a
high rating) and identify responsible person(s) and target date
Follow up matrix report relating to the specific project audited in the
manner consistent with the BRM database indicating priority ratings (the high
issues should match the issues reported in the monthly controller meetings)
Eliminate the summary report that has typically be presented at the monthly
controller meetings

Once the "Project Doorstep" style report presented by  AA is received at the
monthly controller meeting, compliance will input the issues into the second
database to enable the reminder notifications to be sent to the person(s)
responsible for the action step.  In addition, a monthly progress report will
be generated from compliance to the Business Risk Managers to show the
critical (high) issues and implementation detail, if any.

It will be imperative that AA issue final reports on the projects immediately
after they have been completed and deliver the matrix  within two (2) weeks
after the monthly controller meetings to Compliance for inputting to the BRM
database.  If this information is not received within the two week time
period, compliance will notify the BRM's and AA of the deficiency.

It will also be necessary for you, the Business Risk Managers, to notify your
front line personnel that they will be receiving the email notifications on
action plans with specific target dates and with the expectation that the
responsible persons will be expected to respond to the email with the status
report of the issue.

If you are in agreement with this reporting plan, please indicate so in a
return email message to me and I will coordinate all responses and
communicate this to AA.  I feel that this process will provide the BRM's the
necessary information that you have indicated you want to hear in the
controller's meetings, including the candid discussions as well as provide
compliance with the necessary information to maintain the database so the
information is available for the corporate needs.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 31939. Thank
you for your attention.  Donna Lowry


Thanks for your help Bill.

One little thing on the 25th.  The ancillary are still adding up with the
regular purchases in the totals.

Thanks,

Kathy


---------------------- Forwarded by Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2000
01:38 PM ---------------------------

Vance L Taylor
01/24/2000 09:17 AM
To: Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Phillips Petroleum, Inc.

Tom,

Please generate spot tickets in sitara based upon the follow:

12/1/99-12/31/99 Phillips Petroleum Company  6673   750mmbtu/d  100% IF/HSC
less $0.17
01/1/00-01/31/00 Phillips Petroleum Company  6673   750mmbtu/d  100% IF/HSC
less $0.17

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 10/06/2000
04:22 PM ---------------------------

troy_a_benoit@reliantenergy.com on 10/06/2000 03:59:29 PM
To: "Ami Chokshi" <Ami_Chokshi@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: revised

(See attached file: HPL-Oct.xls)
 - HPL-Oct.xls


Attached is a very rough draft of the O&M Agreement based on our
discussions.   There are several blanks concerning the numbers and I have
noted several questions thoughout the agreement that need further
clarification.  I am okay with sending this to the operator with the caveat
that although the general substance of the agreement is in place, there may
be some further changes to the language after further review.  Please review.


---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2001 04:18 PM ---------------------------
From:	Steve Wang/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/22/2001 04:17 PM
To:	Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	New Options Model

Meeting on May 30 at 3:30pm regarding the new Option Model we (Steve Wang, Harry Arora, and Rob Stalford) use to make markets.  The old structuring model was created for marketer to give indicative pricing.  I have created this model especially for option market making.  As market makers we found the old model too slow as we are often making bid/offers in more than five strikes in more than five different months.  This model allows us to make our markets quicker and identify mispricings in the market before our competitors.  This is not to replace the old structuring model.  It is only a complement that will give everyone a better picture of where options are trading and where bid/offers are.  We will publish these prices weekly and will eventually have them on a daily basis.

You will need special permission to access the files located in M:\power2\Options.  Let me know if you want access to this folder.  The following people already have access:

Ahn, Christopher
Ballato, Russell
Baughman, Ed
Benson, Rob
Broderick, Paul
Carson, Mike
Clynes, Terri
Curry, Mike
Dalton, Oscar
Davis, Dana
Dean, Clint
Dorland, Chris
Forney, John
Gilbert-Smith, Doug
Gupta, Gautam
Jester, Larry
Kelly, Michael
King, Jeff
Lorenz, Matt
Presto, Kevin
Quenet, Joe
Scheuer, Janelle
Sewell, Robert (Doug)
Sturm, Fletch
Tingleaf, Drew
Valderrama, Larry
Valdes, Maria
Wheeler, Raymond

Thanks
Steve Wang


Is the Election Pty still on?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Mr. Turner has the signed dissolution papers.

hashworth@technip.com on 07/18/2000 11:26:07 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: "Turner, Gerry (Allstates)" <TurnerGerry@bek.com>, Kay.Mann@Enron.Com

Subject: RE: Anglers

And what would that be..... who has the papers prepared and signed to
date????

Kay.Mann@enron.com on 07/18/2000 09:09:38 AM

To:   Honey Ashworth/TECHNIP-USA
cc:   "Turner, Gerry (Allstates)" <TurnerGerry@bek.com>, Kay.Mann@Enron.Com
Subject:  RE: Anglers

I vote for them to do whatever needs to be done.

hashworth@technip.com on 07/18/2000 08:49:03 AM

To:   "Turner, Gerry (Allstates)" <TurnerGerry@bek.com>, Kay.Mann@Enron.Com
cc:

Subject:  RE: Anglers

Yes, STILL here, definitely the strangest of all!
We need to file a current and final franchise tax report, public info
report, and obtain certificate of good standing.  Also certificates of
dissolution.  I seem to remember some of this being done???
CT will charge $172 per entity if they prepare the certificate of
dissolution and file it and $134  per if they file only.  As I remember
there is a TX Corporation and two TX limited partnerships that need to be
dissolved.  Price is the same whether it is a corp or partnership.
I talk to Jennifer Miller at CT fairly often and one of her team members
told me that they could do it on a Technip order and just bill Anglers, so
let me know what if anything you want them to do.
Hope all is well with everyone.
Talk to you soon.
Honey

"Turner, Gerry (Allstates)" <TurnerGerry@bek.com> on 07/17/2000 04:24:43 PM

To:   Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:   Honey Ashworth/TECHNIP-USA
Subject:  RE: Anglers

Amen.

> ----------
> From:   Kay.Mann@enron.com[SMTP:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
> Sent:   Monday, July 17, 2000 4:16 PM
> To:     Turner, Gerry (Allstates)
> Cc:     HAsworth@Technip.com
> Subject:     Re: Anglers
>
>
> Hey, we all can use a little money.  Life doesn't seem to get any
cheaper.
>
> Honey, I think we discussed C T Systems doing the filing.  Do you recall
> how much it was?  If not, I can see what I can find out.
>
> Which is more strange: Joe in Central America or Jack in Egypt?  Clark in
> Chicago?  Kay at Enron?  Gerry BUYING an engineering company?  Honey
STILL
> at Technip?
>
> Sounds like a great time for a reunion.
>
> Kay
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Turner, Gerry (Allstates)" <TurnerGerry@bek.com> on 07/17/2000 03:15:22
> PM
>
> To:   HAsworth@Technip.com, kmann@enron.com
> cc:
>
> Subject:  Anglers
>
>
> Hello ladies.
>
> I have the signed original (all parnters have signed) of the going out of
> business documents for Anglers.  What is next?
>
> Honey, Kay seems to think there is one more form of some kind, plus a
> filing
> fee.  What do you know about those items?  I'm ready to make a final
> distribution and let you close out the account.  I'll be happy to deliver
> these papers to whomever is the appropriate person, agencey, etc. and
help
> in any way to stop the insanity.
> Can we obtain the final cost for filing the papers, keep that in cash and
> make the final checks out?
>
> My Anglers papers show the following percentages, just in case you've
> gotten
> rid of your files:
>
> Alves                               21.775
> Ashworth                    4.265
> Bailey                              10.895
> Dill                           10.895
> Lockwood                  15.235
> Mann                             4.265
> Napoli                              10.895
> Turner                              21.775
>
> And......Kay, before you start making some smart ...comments,  I don't
> need
> the money and in fact I'll buy the first and last bottle of Krug if we
can
> get together for a final distribution ceremony.
>
> As I always tell Dill (a.k.a. Mokhtar, his new Egyptian
> nickname).......Praise Allah.
>
> Gerry Turner
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


- Rebuttal Testimony Harold Orndorff (05-19-00)


Bob,

I found the warranty deed but I could not find the title policy.  I will call the title company that we used to get a copy today.

Phillip

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Robert W. Huntley, CFP" <wise.counsel@lpl.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 10:48 AM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.
Subject:	Re: Huntley/question

Phillip,

Have you found the title policy?

Thanks,

Bob Huntley

----- Original Message -----
From: <Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com>
To: <wise.counsel@lpl.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:08 AM
Subject: RE: Huntley/question

> I will try and find my title policy this evening.
>
>       -----Original Message-----
>      From:   "Robert W. Huntley, CFP" <wise.counsel@lpl.com>@ENRON
>      Sent:   Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:50 PM
>      To:     Allen, Phillip K.
>      Subject:  Huntley/question
>
>
>      Phillip,
>
>      Could you please do me a favor?  I would like  to read your current
>      title policy to see what it says about easements.  You  should have
>      received a copy during your closing.  I don't know how many  pages it
>      will be but let me know how you want to handle getting a copy  made.
>      I'll be happy to make the copy, or whatever makes it easy for  you.
>
>      Thanks,
>
>      Bob Huntley
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
>