I made a few suggested revisions in the attached tag time table.  BPAT is
supportive of the change to remove the preschedule flag and also to use the
LCA prevailing time.  Thanks for the opportunity to comment.

-----Original Message-----
From: Harshbarger, Robert [mailto:bharsh@puget.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 3:52 PM
To: Ellingson, Mons; Fotiou, Demetrios; Grow, Lisa; Holden-Baker, Susan;
Smith, Chris; Tilghman, Carmine; Underwood, John; Williams, Bill
Cc: 'Hackney, Mark'
Subject: FW: Possible new E-tag time table

Jerry Dempsey has sent the attached regarding the preschedule flag in E-Tag.

What he is proposing is:
*	a revision to the timeline tables in A3A to enable software to make
the determination of whether or not a tag is for preschedule or real-time
(currently it is a flag set by the PSE creating the tag).
*	Referencing time in terms of the Load Control Area's prevailing time
(this fits the Authority Service is associated with the load control area
and it's the Authority Service that keeps the time).

It may be possible to get this revision worked in to the 1.7 release.

Process
Please review his proposal and comment.
Specifically, do you support the concept of removing the flag and using the
timing table logic?
Do you support adjusting times to reference the Load Control Area prevailing
time?

If we reach a consensus on this issue by the end of the week, we can forward
on a recommendation to Mark for distribution to the whole ISAS.  If there is
support from all of ISAS, then it can be taken to NERC IS/TISWG for
approval.

Please let me know by the end of business June 15, 2001.

Bob Harshbarger
425.882.4643
> ----------
> From: 	JERRY DEMPSEY[SMTP:DEMPSEY@wapa.gov]
> Sent: 	Sunday, June 03, 2001 10:42 AM
> To: 	bharsh@puget.com
> Cc: 	Mark.Hackney@aps.com
> Subject: 	Possible new E-tag time table
>
>  <<tag time table draft june 01.doc>>
> Bob,
>
> Mark Hackney suggested I start with you on this issue since you were
> heading up the timing group for ISAS.
>
> Here is the issue - under the current WSCC timing table for tags in Policy
> 3, it is impossible to program whether or not the tag is preschedule or
> real-time.  The NERC tagging group is the group that came up with manually
> selecting the preschedule "flag".  I know that PPW, BPA and ourselves have
> run into a couple of problems with this.  It's been when the merchant has
> selected that flag when it was actually a real-time transaction.  PPW and
> ourselves put it in our scheduling system, BPA (and someone else) did not.
>
>
> At the NERC OSC meeting last week, I asked the question again about how
> can this be fixed in version 1.7.  I was hoping it was as easy as having
> each authority register their timezone in the new Master registry that's
> being developed.  Well - it wasn't that easy.  They explained the other
> problems and I then developed the attached time table.  The group reviewed
> this time table and agreed that it could be automated to determine if a
> tag was preschedule or realtime.
>
> In order to get this programmed into version 1.7, we need to get Policy 3
> revised with the new time table.  In order to get the new time table
> approved, it probably starts with your subgroup, then probably goes to
> Hackney for an e-mail vote to ISAS, then probably on to WSCC OC, then
> finally to NERC.  Problem is we need to do this quickly, by the end of
> June if possible, so that the new Policy 3 will be out in time for 1.7
> release in October.
>
> Now - there's nothing that says this has to happen either.  Another option
> is to just leave it as it is today.  I'd prefer to automate it, but that's
> only my opinion.
>
> At any rate - the NERC OSC has agreed to include timezone in the new NERC
> Master registry.  They have also agreed to incorporate this change into
> 1.7 if it's part of Policy 3.  That's were we stand right now.
>
> As for your subgroup - I don't think I'm on your list, but go ahead and
> add me on if you don't mind.
>
> Call or e-mail if you have any questions.
>
> Thanks - Jerry
> dempsey@wapa.gov
> (970)461-7299
>
>

 - tag time table draft june 01.doc


Blackline to follow.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 01:37
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 01:27:59 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Christopher"
<christophercobb@akllp.com>

Subject: Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC

 <<Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC>>

Sorry for the delay.  Here is the most recent draft of the GE Turbine
Agreement.  I will send the blackline shortly (I hope).
 - Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC


Hey, nice spreadsheet.  Two minor questions:

1) Isn't the provision for taxes on the income statement actually the taxes
on the 'income' they made from using the sales method (equal to 46%), rather
than what they pay will actually pay the IRS under the installment method?  I
think the notes show how instead of paying the 4.1$ based on their recognized
income, they pay some itty bitty amount based on installment.  If so, I think
they actually get a 46%  tax break on the 1 million and change that they lose
using a cash basis.  Still a loss, just not so big.  Anyway, I'm not sure if
I'm thinking straight on this, but that's how I read the numbers.

2) Does the balance sheet have to change a little?  For example, does
shareholder equity change since the income that goes to retained earnings is
now a loss, rather than a gain?  Also, if revenue is recognized on a cash
basis and is now much smaller, there needs to be another liability to equal
out the decrease in revenues with the still large notes receivables on the
asset side (as you note in the answer the notes recievables stays the same).
Seems like they might need a liability like "deferred profits" or some such
thing, such that the ["deferred profits" +  revenues (recognized on cash
basis)] = notes receivables.

Anyway, I may not have this right, but thought I'd bring it up to see what
you think.

Best,
Jeff


Forgot to include you on this.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/29/2000 08:56 AM -----

	Steven J Kean
	12/28/2000 09:19 PM

		 To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Meeting with Governor Davis, need for additional
comments/suggestions

We met with Gov Davis on Thursday evening in LA.  In attendance were Ken Lay,
the Governor, the Governor's staff director (Kari Dohn) and myself.  The gov.
spent over an hour and a half with us covering our suggestions and his
ideas.  He would like some additional thoughts from us by Tuesday of next
week as he prepares his state of the state address for the following Monday.
Attached to the end of this memo is a list of solutions we proposed (based on
my discussions with several of you) as well as some background materials Jeff
Dasovich and I prepared.  Below are my notes from the meeting regarding our
proposals, the governor's ideas, as well as my overview of the situation
based on the governor's comments:

Overview:   We made great progress in both ensuring that he understands that
we are different from the generators and in opening a channel for ongoing
communication with his administration. The gov does not want the utilities to
go bankrupt and seems predisposed to both rate relief (more modest than what
the utilities are looking for) and credit guarantees.  His staff has more
work to do on the latter, but he was clearly intrigued with the idea.  He
talked mainly in terms of raising rates but not uncapping them at the retail
level.  He also wants to use what generation he has control over for the
benefit of California consumers, including utility-owned generation (which he
would dedicate to consumers on a cost-plus basis) and excess muni power
(which he estimates at 3000MW).  He foresees a mix of market oriented
solutions as well as interventionist solutions which will allow him to fix
the problem by '02 and provide some political cover.
Our proposals:  I have attached the outline we put in front of him (it also
included the forward price information several of you provided).  He seemed
interested in 1) the buy down of significant demand, 2) the state setting a
goal of x000 MW of new generation by a date certain, 3) getting the utilities
to gradually buy more power forward and 4) setting up a group of rate
analysts and other "nonadvocates" to develop solutions to a number of issues
including designing the portfolio and forward purchase terms for utilities.
He was also quite interested in examining the incentives surrounding LDC gas
purchases.   As already mentioned, he was also favorably disposed to finding
some state sponsored credit support for the utilities.
His ideas:  The gov read from a list of ideas some of which were obviously
under serious consideration and some of which were mere "brainstorming".
Some of these ideas would require legislative action.
State may build (or make build/transfer arrangements) a "couple" of
generation plants.  The gov feels strongly that he has to show consumers that
they are getting something in return for bearing some rate increases.  This
was a frequently recurring theme.
Utilities would sell the output from generation they still own on a cost-plus
basis to consumers.
Municipal utilties would be required to sell their excess generation in
California.
State universities (including UC/CSU and the community colleges) would more
widely deploy distributed generation.
Expand in-state gas production.
Take state lands gas royalties in kind.
negotiate directly with tribes and state governments in the west for
addtional gas supplies.
Empower an existing state agency to approve/coordinate power plant
maintenance schedules to avoid having too much generation out of service at
any one time.
Condition emissions offsets on commitments to sell power longer term in state.
Either eliminate the ISO or sharply curtail its function -- he wants to hear
more about how Nordpool works(Jeff- someone in Schroeder's group should be
able to help out here).
Wants to condition new generation on a commitment to sell in state.  We made
some headway with the idea that he could instead require utilities to buy
some portion of their forward requirements from new in-state generation
thereby accomplishing the same thing without using a command and control
approach with generators.
Securitize uncollected power purchase costs.
To dos: (Jeff, again I'd like to prevail on you to assemble the group's
thoughts and get them to Kari)
He wants to see 5 year fixed power prices for peak/ off-peak and baseload --
not just the 5 one year strips.
He wants comments on his proposals by Tuesday.
He would like thoughts on how to pitch what consumers are getting out of the
deal.
He wants to assemble a group of energy gurus to help sort through some of the
forward contracting issues.
Thanks to everyone for their help.  We made some progress today.


As discussed for the last several days, attached is the latest version of the
"Pat Wood transmission straw man."  It is virtually the same as what I sent
to you earlier with the exception of some lettering changes.  Our initial
comments are that "H" and "K" are non-starters for Enron and that "C (3)"
must be changed to read:  "that all users of transmission facilities within
the RTO will be under the same rates, terms and conditions of the same tariff
to ensure non-discriminatory access to the electric transmission grid under
non-discriminatory rates, terms and conditions;".

Please advise as soon as possible (i.e. close of business today) should there
be additional issues raised in this context.  Many thanks.

 - dummytransmissionidea.0629.doc


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

East Power Midwest Origination
Beginning late 2000, East Power Marketing implemented a complete market
coverage strategy.  Since then, EPMI has begun to develop relationships with
hundreds of small &mom & pop8 municipalities.  Many of these munis had no
prior contact with Enron.  As a result, East Power has executed a valuable 30
MW energy call option term purchase from the Municipal Energy Agency of
Nebraska (MEAN) at a congested location.

Enron Industrial Markets
EIM has renamed Pulp, Paper & Lumber to Forest Products in order to fully
encompass our multiple product offerings.

East Power Development
The Planning and Zoning Commission for Pompano Beach, FL approved ENA's
rezoning request and site plan for the Pompano Beach Energy Center, a 510
megawatt peaking power plant.  On the rezoning request, the vote was 6 to 1,
and on the site plan, the vote was 7 to 0.  The rezoning request will be
forwarded to the Pompano Beach City Commission for their review.
Additionally, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has
announced its intention to issue an air permit for the facility.

Next steps include a DEP public hearing on Monday, March 26, and the first of
two votes on the rezoning request before the Pompano Beach City Commission,
which is scheduled for Tuesday, March 27.

IN THE NEWS

EWS Brown Bag Lunch
Mark Your Lunch Calendars Now!  The next one is scheduled for Thursday, March
15, 2001 featuring Ray Bowen. He is the COO of EIM and will be discussing
Enron Industrial Markets.

Open Forum Editorial in The San Francisco Chronicle  by Kenneth Lay    3/1/01
What has happened in California over the past four years is not
deregulation.  It is misguided regulation.

Deregulation does not mean eliminating customer choice and competition for
most customers.
Deregulation does not mean limiting new market entrants.  Fewer than five
percent of customers in California are served by competing suppliers.

Deregulation does not mean creating a single central power pool from which
all participants must buy and sell their wholesale power; the state Power
Exchange effectively replaced three monopoly buyers with one monopoly buyer.

Deregulation does not mean buying all of your commodity at the last minute,
on the spot market, rather than planning ahead and purchasing most of the
power under long-term contracts that lock in prices.

The situation in California is the result of continued regulation,
complicated by a series of natural and man-made factors.

WELCOME
New Hires
EGM  - Lowell Bezanis, Owen Zidar
EIM   - Eric Holzer, John Ovanessian
ENA  - Mecole Brown, Nita Garcia, Ambroshia Hunter, Nikole Jackson, Junichi
Sugiura, Theresa Zucha, Cynthia Gonzalez, Scott Wilson, Kenton Schaefer,
Emily Butler

Transfers
ENA - Joseph Hardy, Nancy Vu, Lloyd Miller, Jinsung Myung, Patrick Johnson,
Jason Wolfe, Andrew Miles, Sara Shackleton
EIM  - Sherri Baldwin, Debbie Chance, Rob Saltiel
EGM - Jody Crook, Neithard Foley, Juan Paysse, Bhavna Pandya, Courtney
Campbell, Terri Denning

NUGGETS & NOTES

"It is on the high side of medium to high." --Tim Battaglia, Vice
President/Steel Origination EIM (discussing the probability of a transaction
closing).

&I wanna see the phone glued to your ear!8 -- Ed Baughman, Vice
President/East Power Mid Market ENA

&REFERRALS, REFERRALS, REFERRALS!  It pays to know good people." ) Ambroshia
Hunter Perry/HR ENA

You requested more info(. Proud parents Michelle Vitrella, PR coordinator,
and husband David Vitrella, manager of trading, have named their baby girl
Lily Ann. She was born on February 27, 2001.

Learning at the Speed of Enron
If you haven't had a chance to log on to www.investinme.enron.com, you're
missing a fast and easy way to gain the information you need to get ahead and
stay ahead. This new EWS training site combines everything you loved about
Ernie with much, much more.  Enron employees now have the ability to register
for hundreds of classes on industry-related topics anywhere in the world.
Don't have time to attend a classroom training? No problem, you can now use
the web site to search for books, videos, CD ROM, and web-based training. All
the learning you want, anytime, anywhere.  Just go to
www.investinme.enron.com and start building your future today!

NEWS FROM THE GLOBAL FLASH

Enron Wind
Enron Wind has purchased the factory facilities of the Dutch company, Aerpac,
Europe's second largest producer of wind turbine rotor blades.  This move
represents a significant step towards fulfilling Enron Wind's strategic
objective of manufacturing high-quality and technically sophisticated rotor
blades in-house.  Enron Wind will be using its own moulds to produce the
rotor blades.  The acquisition of the Almelo-based factory facilities, which
are only 60 kilometres from Enron Wind's facilities in Salzbergen, Germany,
gives the company a convenient base for European wide distribution.

Enron applies for Greek electricity trading license
Enron, through its subsidiary Enron Power MEPE, has applied for an
electricity supply license for Greece, for the 34% market opening on Feb 19th
2001.  If the license application is successful, Enron will be allowed to
approach customers consuming more than 100GWh up to a combined total peak
capacity of 350MW.  In total, 4 companies have applied for power trading
licenses (Enel, ATEL and Cinergy also applied).

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed.


FYI
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000 10:58 AM -----

	Jon Barrett@MGLTD
	08/04/2000 10:58 AM

		 To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: MG - US Regulatory Status...

Justin

Sorry for the delay in catching up with my e-mails. Yes, MG London Inc is the
clearing member of NYMEX/COMEX and is FCM & CTA. The only other MG companies
who have any exchange/regulatory registrations are in the UK and are
Metallgesellschaft Ltd (LME & SFA, also LIFFE to come), MG Brokers Ltd (LME &
SFA), MG Metal & Commodity Co Ltd (LME only).

Rgds

Jon

Justin Boyd@ECT
31/07/2000 20:53
To: Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: MG - US Regulatory Status...

Jon,

Grateful if you could complete the picture for me and for Mark Taylor.    Is
MG London Inc. the entity that is the Clearing Member of NYMEX + a Futures
Commission Merchant and Commodity Trading Advisor?   Do any other (MG)
entities have similar registrations, and if so, what are these?

Thanks

Justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 31/07/2000 20:47
---------------------------
From: Mark Taylor on 28/07/2000 16:44 CDT
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: MG

Justin:

Do you know whether we have acquired any companies with CFTC registrations of
any kind (e.g. Commodity Trading Advisor or Futures Commission Merchant)?  I
was wondering who was responsible for compliance matters if we have.

I hope you're well and all my best to Fran.

Mark


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Fischer/PDX/ECT on 05/02/2001 02:39 PM ---------------------------

"Neeley, Myrna" <MNeeley@caiso.com> on 05/01/2001 03:53:06 PM
To:	Cheri Pryor <CPryor@caiso.com>, Market Status <MarketStatus@caiso.com>, Pacific Northwest Security Coordinator <wsccnwsc@bpa.gov>, PX Realtime <pxrt@calpx.com>, "Rocky Mountain, Desert Southwest Security Coordinator" <rmrsecur@warmr.net>, WSCC Emergency Contacts <summer@wscc.com>
cc:

Subject:	Total Transfer Capabilities

Attached are the Total Transfer Capabilities (TTC's) for May 3, 2001.

 <<TTC 5-3-01.PDF>>

The attached Outage information is reliable at time of posting.  The
attached Outage information is subject to change without notice.

Myrna Neeley
Administrative Assistant
Outage Coordination & Transmission Maintenance
California Independent System Operator
Voice: 916-351-2171
 Fax: 916-351-2367
E-mail  mneeley@caiso.com

 - TTC 5-3-01.PDF


Absolutely.  In fact, I had planned to prepare a draft today and cover with you prior to giving anything to Kelly tomorrow.  That's my normal mode of operation.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cash, Michelle
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:40 PM
To: Yowman, Andrea
Subject: RE: Management Committee presentation - Any suggestions

Andrea, I would like to review whatever presentation you provide to Ken Lay, as I continue to have concerns that information can be used against us.  Perhaps it would be useful for me to discuss this with you and Kelly, as I know that you are aware of and appreciate my concerns.  Thanks a lot.  Michelle

-----Original Message-----
From: Yowman, Andrea
Sent: Wed 10/17/2001 8:33 PM
To: Cash, Michelle
Cc:
Subject: FW: Management Committee presentation - Any suggestions

Hi Michelle,
Do you have any suggestions so that I can move forward in finalizing the data based on our discussion of having Jeanerette run the numbers?

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Yowman, Andrea
Sent:   Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:31 PM
To:     Kimberly, Kelly
Subject:        Management Committee presentation - FYI

Kelly,
A part of the Management Committee presentation, we will need the DATA as part of 'business case'.  Michelle Cash and I have discussed using Jeanerette to calculate the standard deviations.  I was hoping to get the clearance from Mary Joyce to prepare and provide the data.  As you can see, from the original note of Oct. 8th I am at a standstill and am positive I cannot get this information turned around, analyzed and ready as a part of the presentation by Friday noon, per your request.

So I will prepare a proposed presentation without the data.  I hope to get this resolved shortly.   Please let me know if you have any questions.

ay

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Wright, Teresa
Sent:   Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:41 AM
To:     Yowman, Andrea
Subject:        RE: Mid-Year PRC Results for HR

I will work with the Assistants to schedule something for this week.

Happy Boss's day!

T.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Yowman, Andrea
Sent:   Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:53 AM
To:     Wright, Teresa
Cc:     Joyce, Mary; Cash, Michelle
Subject:        RE: Mid-Year PRC Results for HR

Thanks.  That would be great.  Do you think it can be this week because we are trying to get a presentation ready for Mr. Lay.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Wright, Teresa
Sent:   Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:01 AM
To:     Yowman, Andrea
Cc:     Joyce, Mary
Subject:        FW: Mid-Year PRC Results for HR

Good Morning Andrea:

Mary is unavailable today.  Would you like for me to coordinate with Mary and Michelle another time for you to meet?

Please let me know I would be glad to assist.

Teresa

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Yowman, Andrea
Sent:   Tuesday, October 16, 2001 7:00 AM
To:     Joyce, Mary; Cash, Michelle
Subject:        RE: Mid-Year PRC Results for HR

Mary/Michelle,
Would it be possible for us to meet today to discuss the HR data needed to to run the standard deviations.  All other data has been prepared to submit to Jeanerette.

Thanks.
ay

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Yowman, Andrea
Sent:   Monday, October 08, 2001 6:00 PM
To:     Joyce, Mary
Cc:     Schultea, Kathryn; Cash, Michelle; Olson, Cindy
Subject:        Mid-Year PRC Results for HR

Mary,
We are currently in the process of doing diversity analysis with the Mid-Year 2001 PRC data.  We will also have the Jeanerette group run the standard deviations.  Since I have taken on the EEO/AAP responsibility, Michelle and I agree that the HR data needs to be incorporated into the analysis and will need your approval for me to get access to the information.   Please let me know what I need to do to get clearance.  Our target is to get the information ready by Thursday but will need at least a day to consolidate the information.

Thanks. ay

Andrea Yowman
Enron Corp
713-853-1477


Take advantage of the following courses remaining for 2001.

Electric Business Understanding - November 27
The Electric Business Understanding Seminar will give a basic overview of the electric business for those with limited knowledge of this industry. This seminar is recommended for entry level to mid-level employees in either the gas or electric business or in businesses providing services to these industries.

Understanding Swaps - November 8 & 9 and December 13 & 14
This course is appropriate for all employees wishing to obtain a practical understanding of the basic natural gas and power derivative structures that are traded and marketed today. An emphasis is placed on understanding how financial tools are added to physical structures to meet the risk management needs of clients.

Understanding Options - November 27 & 28 and December 18 & 19
This course builds on our Derivatives 1 program and is appropriate for all employees looking to extend their knowledge of basic derivatives. Swaps and options are revisited, but from a more sophisticated perspective. Option pricing concepts are approached pragmatically, both from the trading and structuring/marketing perspectives. The program does not involve complex mathematics.

Structuring Natural Gas Transactions - November 19 & 20
This course builds on the DI - Applied Energy Derivatives program, focusing on deal structuring opportunities particular to the Natural Gas markets.  Participants will develop insights into the economic inter-relationships between the physical operations (pipelines, storage, generation, etc.) and their synthetic financial counterparts (basis, time spread and multi-fuel derivatives).  Emphasis is directed at identifying marketing opportunities that follow from these concepts.  This is not an introduction to natural gas markets.

For enrollment, or more information on these courses, please log on to http://elm.enron.com.


Why don't you fax that letter up to me so I can figure out what it is,
646-3490...
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2000 01:51 PM
---------------------------

Susan Flynn
01/11/2000 01:46 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Legal Question

 Tana - pleas handle.   Thank you!

Joe - FYI -  All issues regarding online trading should addressed to Tana
Jones - she is the online key contact.

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2000 01:45
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Larry Joe Hunter                           01/11/2000 01:41 PM

To: Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Legal Question

Susan,

We have notified Bank of Montreal of our intentions not to verbally confirm
any deals in which we have done through a broker or through Enron Online.
BOM has therefore sent us a letter which confirms this for their auditing
purposes which they would like for us to sign.  We want to make sure Legal is
OK with us signing something like this before we send it back to them.  Let
me know if you want to see the Letter.

Thanks,
joe


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 10:33 AM -----

	"EEI Energy Delivery Group" <EDGroup@eei.org>
	10/12/2000 03:17 PM

		 To: <Anthony.Duenner@enron.com>, <chris.gaffney@enron.com>,
<dallegre@enron.com>, <ddornan@enron.com>, <dfossum@enron.com>,
<dfulton@enron.com>, <eaafedt@enron.com>, <fbay@enron.com>,
<fking@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <JKeller@enron.com>,
<jsteffe@enron.com>, <julia.murray@enron.com>, <Lhuber@enron.com>,
<mary.hain@enron.com>, <meyer@enron.com>, <mpavlou@enron.com>,
<rfrank@enron.com>, <scorman@enron.com>, <scovino@enron.com>,
<skean@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>, <stweed@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RTO FILINGS SUMMARIES

EEI Presents . . .

RTO Summaries: The October Filings

Full summaries of the October RTO Filings, available in pdf format, no later
than October 30, 2000. Order Today!

RTO Summaries: The October Filings

This timely, essential, cost-effective resource will include:

?  Introduction and Summary Matrix of Each RTO filing

?  Coverage for each RTO filing:
   -  Each of the twelve characteristics and functions
      -  What is proposed
      -  How it comports with Order No. 2000
   -  Additional Comments

?  Summary of individual company filings to join an RTO or alternative filing

?  Individual map of each RTO

Plan Ahead and Order EEI's RTO Summaries: The January Filings Now.
Buy both sets and save.

RTO Summaries: The October Filings
Item # 13-00-14
List Price: $995.00
EEI Associate Members: $895.00
EEI Utility Members: $795.00
Government: $195.00

RTO Summaries: The January Filings
Item # 13-00-05
List Price: $995.00
EEI Associate Members: $895.00
EEI Utility Members: $795.00
Government: $195.00

RTO Summaries: The October and January Filings
Item # 13-00-06
List Price: $1895.00
EEI Associate Members: $1695.00
EEI Utility Members: $1495.00
Government: $295.00

Ordering information:

Call EEI at 1-800-EEI-5453 (U.S. & Canada) or 301-645-4222 (International) to
place your order.  Once payment has been received, a pdf file will be
e-mailed to you.

Product Questions:
Contact Jay Carriere at (202) 508-5525 or jcarriere@eei.org


************************************************
Weekly Web Specials
************************************************

________________________________________________________
1) WEB SPECIALS INTRODUCTION

Web Specials are a great way to save on flights with Alaska Airlines and
Horizon Air. Web Specials can only be purchased online through the Alaska
Airlines/Horizon Air Web Site. Hurry, seats are limited, prices and
markets subject to change.

Our Web Specials are available via our home page at
http://www.alaskaair.com or http://www.horizonair.com

________________________________________________________
2) WEB SPECIALS VALID DATES

Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air offer Web Specials for travel:

Originating:
Wednesday, February 7, 2001
Thursday, February 8, 2001
Saturday, February 10, 2001

Returning:
Saturday, February 10, 2001
Monday, February 12, 2001
Tuesday, February 13, 2001

________________________________________________________
3) WEB SPECIALS FARES

All fares quoted in US dollars, without airport fees and segment tax.

Roundtrip Coach fares for travel between:

Anchorage, AK             Chicago/O'Hare, IL        $419.00
Anchorage, AK             Juneau, AK                $129.00
Anchorage, AK             Ketchikan, AK             $199.00
Anchorage, AK             Phoenix, AZ               $389.00
Anchorage, AK             Wrangell, AK              $199.00
Boise, ID                 Ontario, CA               $179.00
Boise, ID                 Pocatello, ID              $59.00
Boise, ID                 Portland, OR               $59.00
Boise, ID                 Orange/Santa Ana, CA      $179.00
Chicago/O'hare, IL        Anchorage, AK             $419.00
Chicago/O'hare, IL        Fairbanks, AK             $419.00
Chicago/O'hare, IL        Juneau, AK                $419.00
Cordova, AK               Kotzebue, AK              $229.00
Cordova, AK               Nome, AK                  $229.00
Eugene/Springfield, OR    Los Angeles, CA           $109.00
Eugene/Springfield, OR    Portland, OR               $59.00
Eugene/Springfield, OR    San Jose, CA              $159.00
Fairbanks, AK             Chicago/O'Hare, IL        $419.00
Fairbanks, AK             Sacramento, CA            $389.00
Juneau, AK                Anchorage, AK             $129.00
Juneau, AK                Chicago/O'Hare, IL        $419.00
Juneau, AK                Ketchikan, AK              $99.00
Juneau, AK                Sitka, AK                  $59.00
Ketchikan, AK             Anchorage, AK             $199.00
Ketchikan, AK             Juneau, AK                 $99.00
Kotzebue, AK              Cordova, AK               $229.00
Los Angeles, CA           Eugene/Springfield, OR    $109.00
Los Angeles, CA           Missoula, MT              $199.00
Los Angeles, CA           Moses Lake/Ephrata, WA    $179.00
Los Angeles, CA           Pasco/Tri Cities, WA      $199.00
Los Angeles, CA           Spokane, WA               $169.00
Los Angeles, CA           Vancouver, BC             $160.00
Missoula, MT              Los Angeles, CA           $199.00
Missoula, MT              Oakland, CA               $199.00
Missoula, MT              Phoenix, AZ               $199.00
Missoula, MT              San Francisco, CA         $199.00
Missoula, MT              Seattle, WA               $109.00
Moses Lake/Ephrata, WA    Los Angeles, CA           $179.00
Moses Lake/Ephrata, WA    Seattle, WA                $59.00
Nome, AK                  Cordova, AK               $229.00
Oakland, CA               Missoula, MT              $199.00
Oakland, CA               Pasco/Tri Cities, WA      $119.00
Ontario, CA               Boise, ID                 $179.00
Pasco/Tri Cities, WA      Los Angeles, CA           $199.00
Pasco/Tri Cities, WA      Oakland, CA               $119.00
Pasco/Tri Cities, WA      Portland, OR               $59.00
Pasco/Tri Cities, WA      San Diego, CA             $179.00
Pasco/Tri Cities, WA      San Jose, CA              $119.00
Phoenix, AZ               Anchorage, AK             $389.00
Phoenix, AZ               Missoula, MT              $199.00
Phoenix, AZ               Seattle, WA               $169.00
Pocatello, ID             Boise, ID                  $59.00
Portland, OR              Boise, ID                  $59.00
Portland, OR              Eugene/Springfield, OR     $59.00
Portland, OR              Pasco/Tri Cities, WA       $59.00
Portland, OR              Redmond/Bend, OR           $79.00
Portland, OR              San Jose, CA               $99.00
Portland, OR              Orange/Santa Ana, CA      $179.00
Redmond/Bend, OR          Portland, OR               $79.00
Redmond/Bend, OR          San Diego, CA             $229.00
Sacramento, CA            Fairbanks, AK             $389.00
Sacramento, CA            Seattle, WA                $99.00
San Diego, CA             Pasco/Tri Cities, WA      $179.00
San Diego, CA             Redmond/Bend, OR          $229.00
San Francisco, CA         Missoula, MT              $199.00
San Jose, CA              Eugene/Springfield, OR    $159.00
San Jose, CA              Pasco/Tri Cities, WA      $119.00
San Jose, CA              Portland, OR               $99.00
Orange/Santa Ana, CA      Boise, ID                 $179.00
Orange/Santa Ana, CA      Portland, OR              $179.00
Orange/Santa Ana, CA      Spokane, WA               $179.00
Seattle, WA               Missoula, MT              $109.00
Seattle, WA               Moses Lake/Ephrata, WA     $59.00
Seattle, WA               Phoenix, AZ               $169.00
Seattle, WA               Sacramento, CA             $99.00
Sitka, AK                 Juneau, AK                 $59.00
Spokane, WA               Los Angeles, CA           $169.00
Spokane, WA               Orange/Santa Ana, CA      $179.00
Vancouver, BC             Los Angeles, CA           $160.00
Wrangell, AK              Anchorage, AK             $199.00

Additional markets are available at
http://shopping.alaskaair.com/webspecials/start.asp
Check the Alaska Web Specials page periodically as additional markets and
dates may be added.

________________________________________________________
4) WEB SPECIALS RULES

* Valid on Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air only.
* Seats are limited and may not be available on all flights/dates.
* Offer is for a very limited time and is subject to change without notice.
* Valid on new bookings only.
* Reservations must be made using the Alaska Airlines Web Site. Tickets
require immediate purchase by credit card when reservations are made.
* Ticketing will be electronic, using Instant Ticket services.
* Tickets are non-refundable, non-changeable and are of no value after the
last date of your planned travel.
* Fares quoted do not include Passenger Facilities Charges of up to $18 or
segment fees of $2.75 per flight segment. A flight segment is defined as
one takeoff and one landing.
* Other restrictions apply.

________________________________________________________
5) HILTON HOTEL SPECIALS

For special value rates at Hilton Hotels in Alaska Airlines cities visit
the Hilton web site at
http://www.hilton.com/specials/values/akairvalues.html

========================================================
You are receiving this message today because you subscribed to our Email
Notification Service. While we'd be pleased to continue to tell you about
our great products and prices, you can unsubscribe by visiting our Web
site at http://www2.alaskaair.com/listserv/webmail.asp

Please do not respond to this message. Mail sent to this address cannot be
answered.


Thanks.  Glad you had a good time


Vasant,

I agree.

Vince

From: Vasant Shanbhogue/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/01/2001 10:00 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Resume

Vince,

 he seems to have mostly equity and fixed income background (and then some
credit exposure calculation) with not much credit data analysis experience.
I do not think he would be appropriate for Bryan's group -- he needs a person
who tracks market developments and understands fundamental data, and although
this guy may be good at modeling, we already have Iris and Amitava doing the
modeling and looking at data.  At this stage, I would prefer to hire somebody
with direct experience in credit analysis (banking, rating agency).  I am
worried that if we get another person without data analysis experience, then
Amitava will find himself with two people (Iris being the other one) who are
both inexperienced in this area, and he will find himself doing a lot of the
work anyway.
 If you want to pursue him, we should probably do a phone interview first.

Vasant

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kaminski, Vince
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 5:33 PM
To: Shanbhogue, Vasant
Subject: RE: Resume

Vasant,

What do you think?  He may be expensive.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001
05:31 PM ---------------------------

Marshall Brown <Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com> on 04/25/2001 01:13:44 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RE: Resume

Vince,
     I apologize, I sent you the wrong resume!  Here is the correct one.
 <<LITT_THO.DOC>>

Marshall Brown
Vice President
Robert Walters Associates
Phone #: 212-704-0596
Fax #:212-704-4312
marshall.brown@robertwalters.com
www.robertwalters.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 1:08 PM
> To: Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com
> Subject: Re: Resume
>
>
> Marshall,
>
> He looks OK but below the level of quant skills I typically look for
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
> Marshall Brown <Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com> on 04/23/2001 09:33:00
> AM
>
> To:   Vince Kaminski <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Resume
>
>
> Vince,
>      I know this candidate is actively interviewing at El Paso and I think
> Reliant.  He has excellent quantitative background, but no real energy
> experience.  If you are interested in speaking with him let me know.
> Regards,
> Marshall Brown
> Vice President
> Robert Walters Associates
> Phone #: 212-704-0596
> Fax #:212-704-4312
> marshall.brown@robertwalters.com
> www.robertwalters.com
>
>
>  <<LITT_HAR.DOC>>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> CAUTION: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure and could
> be intercepted by a third party.
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> (See attached file: LITT_HAR.DOC)
>
>  << File: LITT_HAR.DOC >>

 - LITT_THO.DOC << File: LITT_THO.DOC >>


The report named: West VaR and Peak Position Report By Trader <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=26&report_name=West+VaR+and+Peak+Position+Report+By+Trader&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/17/2001>, published as of 10/17/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000
05:22 PM ---------------------------

Amitava Dhar@ENRON
11/14/2000 03:45 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Writeup on methodology for Bankruptcy Swap Pricing Regression Model

This is the first draft.  Please let me know if you want me make changes.


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron on 03/23/2001 01:21 PM -----

	David Portz@ECT
	03/23/2001 12:55 PM

		 To: Jim Malone/HOU/NewPower@NewPower
		 cc: Anoush Farhangi/HOU/NewPower@NEWPOWER@EES, John
Ranieri/HOU/NewPower@NewPower, James L Copeland/ENRON@enronXgate, Genia
FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Parks/Enron@EnronXGate, Mike Curry/Enron@EnronXGate, (bcc: Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron)
		 Subject: Re: Texas QSE agreement/EEI Master

Per my voicemail last night to Anoush, attached is a draft EEI Master Power
Purchase & Sale Agreement cover sheet for your review and comment on behalf
of New Power.  Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments.

David Portz
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-9239
Fax: (713) 646-3491


Thanks for the resume.  She has had some good experience.  Do you know much
about her performance here at Enron?  Can I call and talk with her directly?
I would certainly keep the conversation confidential at this point.  --Sally

Vince J Kaminski
11/21/2000 08:14 AM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Resume

I am sending you a resume of  Renee Smith, an employee of EBS.

She is considering  a transfer at some point to another position within Enron.

She has a lot of brokerage industry experience and she is very enthusiastic
about Enron.

No need to mention it's a confidential request.

Have a very happy Thanksgiving.

Vince


Stop by on your way home and I'll give you a piece.


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 08/18/2000 04:42 PM
---------------------------

Todd.Neal@chron.com on 08/18/2000 03:17:03 PM
To: sneal@enron.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Fishing Trip

Scott,

What do you think?  Should we book him?  Have you found any other options?
Check out the website at www.ambergriscaye.com
<http://www.ambergriscaye.com> .

Todd

 -----Original Message-----
From: Tropic Air Ltd. [mailto:tropicair@btl.net]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 8:17 AM
To: Todd.Neal@chron.com
Subject: Fishing Trip

Todd,

I am available for fishing with you on Sept.8. On the 8 Sept. when you
arrive, I will take you to fish and we can discuss what type of deep fishing
you want. It is no problem getting a guide if I can not take you deep
fishing. This is a slow season and a lot of tour guides are available. You
do not need to bring any equipment. We have any kind you need. Are you
staying at Holiday Hotel ? I will speak to you on the day of your arrival.
Hope to see you soon.

Abel Guerrero Esq.


There are still several issues in the CES retail contract that need to be
resolved as soon as possible.  In order to be productive in our meetings, I
am sending each of you a copy of the Retail agreements to review before we
meet with CES (they will be hand delivered).  Please review them, especially
the schedules and exhibits, so we can finalize all the issues without having
to go back and check on a bunch of items.

I have set up the first meeting with CES on Friday, January 7th at 11:00
am--I will let you know the conference room location later.  Please advise
ASAP if you cannot attend.  Also please review the following list of issues
to be resolved and let me know by 10:00 am January 6th if you know of any
others to be added so that I can send CES an agenda.

Issues to be resolved:

Transportation Contract #65403
Verification of Exhibit 1 data--make sure documentation reflects agreed upon
pricing methodology
Finalize storage proxy schedules and agree on pricing mechanism for
theoretical versus physical storage injections & withdrawals
Intraday nomination procedures

Pittsburgh vs. Herndon issues

Retail vs Wholesale questions: Beth Steel, Erestec, Allied Signal, CALP, GELP

Nomination issues
 load estimation-specifically AGL
 nomination change deadlines and associated pricing

Process for data exchanges both first of the month and daily.

Thanks for your prompt response.


EURELECTRIC Conference on
Electricity & Natural Gas: Evolution and Opportunities in Two Converging
Energy Markets
11 & 12 June 2001 - Centro IFEMA - Feria de Madrid, Spain

 <<Conference Speakers.doc>>

 - Conference Speakers.doc


I'm in a really boring meeting. Please email me!  Tell mesomething good
Heather Kroll


Following please find the Weekly Management Report and the Daily Executive
Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 12/08/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,726
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,303
Total Life to Date Transactions	511,791

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 12/08/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	2,845	75%
Enron Europe Limited	125	29%
Global Products	128	28%
Enron Metals	628	22%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	55%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,572,357,333
MTD	27,663,074,945
LTD	306,833,491,990
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	3,365,170,781

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	19,978,551,163

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	602
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	4
Number of Products Offered Today	968
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,988
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,946

Also attached is the Weekly Public Domain Report, containing information
which is intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron.


It was good to talk to you live.  I miss our chats, but this is the wrong
time and place to discuss that.  Please do not fret at all about not asking
me to stand up.  For what it is worth I didn't ask you either.  I think you
are correct it would have been akward for both of us.  This week is a time
when you need as little stress as possible to cope with al the people that
are pulling at you.  So you know, do not worry about us, we are there to
celebrate with you and meet your family.  Take care of the other high
maintenance people, because you will be suprised how many there are.  Try and
relax and enjoy it.  I am looking forward to seeing you in that dress.  See
you soon.
PL

rachel.m.bonilla@ac.com on 10/09/2000 03:28:50 PM
To: Phillip.M.Love@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: hotel

Hey Phillip, I am in the office now...but will be leaving soon and will not
be working the rest of the week.  We should chat live.  But...as for as
Friday goes...I am giving each room a guest box.  And in the box is a
map/tour guide of things you can do.  The luncheon....well, other than my
brother (and not totally sure he is coming...but will know tonight) you are
the only guy invited...and Ashely of course.  If you were a girl (which I
am happy you are not) you would be in my wedding party....and the lunch is
a way to say thanks to those close to me.  If you and Ashley can't come b/c
Grandma, etc....I totally understand.  Please do not feel obligated.  But,
can you please let me know...I have to give the restaurant a head count.  I
am still working on Thursday night.  BUT....worst case...check with the
front desk.  I will leave where we are, or what the plans are if in fact I
am not there.  I'll try and call you tonight.  OK..I am not nervous...but I
am losing my mind right now!!  Too many things to do!!!  Anyhow...did want
to let you know that I really thought about having you in Jason's wedding
party....but then thought it might not be the most appropriate.  Might have
been a little weird.  Just wanted to let you know that I did think about
you.

Rach

Rachel M. Bonilla
Andersen Consulting
North American C&HT
Denver - Octel 359/6017 - Direct Dial (720) 359-6017
rachel.m.bonilla@ac.com

            Phillip.M.Love@enron.c
            om                            To:     Rachel M. Bonilla@Andersen
Consulting
                                          cc:
            10/09/2000 08:39 AM           Subject:     Re: hotel

I don't know if you are working any this week, but I will send an email any
way.  We were wondering what there might be to do in Denver on Friday?
Since we have all day, are there musuems or things unique to Denver to see?
I know there is some luncheon on Friday, is that for couples or just girls?
Wasn't really sure.  We get in about we land on Thursday at 5 p.m. and her
grandmother lands at 6 p.m. so we should be at the hotel by around 6:45.
Should we call your room or meet you somewhere?  Talk to you soon.
PL


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
2/8/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 0
2/8/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
2/8/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 1,395,617
2/8/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 171,132
2/8/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 1,449,781


Please  update my listing for direct reports.  Do you distribute a copy of
this to my direct reports?  If so, please get an updated copy to them as
well.  Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/06/2000 03:43 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Yvette G Connevey @ ENRON                           01/06/2000 01:28 PM

To: Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect,
Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Jordan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ragayle Pellum/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela
Chambers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Katherine Benedict/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gretel
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Brenda Herod's new pager #

Brenda has a new pager. She can be paged numerically at (877) 497.3757 or
through your Lotus Notes Message to Pager feature.  If you need to send her a
BRIEF e-mail through her pager and do not have access to your Lotus Notes
Message to Pager feature she can be reached by e-mailing
8777208398.4973757@pagenetmessage.net. If you have any questions please call
and if you know of anyone else who may need this information please pass this
on.

Thank You!
Yvette
x3.5953


yes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dietrich, Dan
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 3:17 PM
To:	DL-GA-Canada_Calgary; DL-GA-Canada_EnronDirect_Calgary; DL-Portland World Trade Center
Cc:	DL-Portland IT; IT Calgary
Subject:	RE: Viewing of All Employee Meeting

Update...

The Internal Communications department has not yet released the original video. I don't have an ETA at this time.

I would like to have a feel for how many people are still interested in viewing this meeting. Please send me an email if you are interested in viewing the replay of the All Employee Meeting. I will then communicate with those who are interested. DO NOT select reply to all as it will go to all Calgary and Portland employees.

Regards,

Dan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dietrich, Dan
Sent:	Thursday, August 16, 2001 2:31 PM
To:	DL-GA-Canada_Calgary; DL-GA-Canada_EnronDirect_Calgary; DL-Portland World Trade Center
Cc:	DL-Portland IT; IT Calgary; ENS Backbone; Ray, Edward; Behney, Chris; Smith, Bruce
Subject:	Viewing of All Employee Meeting

All,

The viewing of the All Employee Meeting today was not a complete success despite our successful testing yesterday. There were several IT teams (your local IT Support as well as Houston based Web and Network teams) that worked together to troubleshoot the audio and video feeds while watching the performance of your sites communication links with Houston to ensure your trading business was not compromised. I would like to provide you some history as well as go forward actions to provide better audio/video streaming services.

You may have noticed that the medium for viewing the meeting has changed from the previous IPTV application to a web based application. This new medium has been in the development stages with the production target of October 2001 which was set by business. Last Friday business approached IT infrastructure and advised that there would be an All Employee Meeting on Aug, 16 (today). This didn't provide much time for preparation and testing. During the troubleshooting for each of your sites, the Network team (Scott Shishido and George Nguyen) were able to determine some but not all causes to the poor performance. I will be meeting with the Web (Edward Ray) and Network (Steve Hardy and Scott Shishido) teams to determine what the action plan is for resolving the performance issues.

My understanding is that the meeting will be available for viewing if you wish to do so. I will be communicating to you when your site will be able to view this replay of the All Employee Meeting.

Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Dan Dietrich
713-345-8836


Elizabeth and Bill - As you are aware the NSTAR transaction has been split
into a one year deal with a potential long term (3 year) deal to follow as
NSTAR felt the structure of the long term deal was complex and would require
certain regulatory approvals (which had long lead time and were potentially
difficult to obtain).  The one year deal will not require such approvals and
will be structured like the current 6-month deal with which NSTAR is
comfortable.

This structure eliminates certain issues including the physical/financial
netting issue.  This is because the financial swap and put is eliminated and
in its place is simply a fixed energy offset amount which reduces the volumes
Enron is required to deliver.

The short term structure was set up whereby EPMI would be obligated to supply
each of the NSTAR operating subs (Boston Edison, Cambridge, and Commonwealth)
under one agreement.  There are embedded cross defaults in the agreement
(e.g. a ratings drop by any NSTAR sub results in a MAC).  However, the
agreement also included a provision that each of the NSTAR subs is severally
but not jointly liable.  Thus, in a NSTAR default termination scenario EPMI
would likely need to stream volumes and calculate 3 separate termination
payments and subsequently pursue each sub separately notwithstanding the
obligation to pay the termination payment is set up as a collective
obligation of the NSTAR subs.

Unlike the 6-month deal, the attached draft provides that NSTAR is obligated
to deliver a parent guarantee.  This was resisted by NSTAR on the short term
deal as each of the NSTAR subs has an above investment grade (I believe A-)
credit rating.  I will leave it to Bill to determine whether a parent
guarantee is required or appropriate; however, provision of the guarantee
would provide somewhat of a fix to the several liability structure.

I have been advised that NSTAR has a board meeting on Monday and would like
to see the draft tomorrow.  In this regard it would be greatly appreciate if
you could provide comments on the document by tomorrow morning.

Regards
CJG

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT on 09/28/2000 10:01
AM ---------------------------

"MICHAEL W E DIDRIKSEN" <MDIDRIKSEN@LLGM.COM> on 09/27/2000 11:21:48 PM
To: <cgaffne@enron.com>, <dallegre@enron.com>, <jader@enron.com>,
<john.llodra@enron.com>, <Mark.Bernstein@enron.com>
cc: "JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>

Subject: Revised NSTAR WPSA

Per the request of John Klauberg, attached please find a marked copy of a new
version of the NSTAR WPSA, revised to reflect the changes to the transaction
following your meeting with NSTAR.  I have marked the draft to show changes
from the original six month transaction.  Please be advised that John
Klauberg has not yet reviewed the draft, but is receiving it at the same time
as you are.

Please call me if you have any questions.  I can be reached at the number
below.

Mike Didriksen

_____________________________________________________________
NOTICE:  This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments, and notify me by return mail, e-mail or at (212)424-8352.  The
unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail,
including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

Michael Didriksen
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
125 West 55th Street
New York, NY  10019
(212)424-8352
fax:  (212)424-8500
mdidriksen@llgm.com

 - NSTAR WPSA redline 9-27.doc


Steve,
Just want to make sure you have me as Bill Williams III.
Thanks,
BIll

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Bill
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 7:54 AM
To:	Williams III, Bill
Cc:	Merris, Steven
Subject:	FW: EES Model for 6/11

This must be for you Bill.
Perhaps you can contact Mr. Merris.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Merris, Steven
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:55 AM
To:	EES Power Settlements,
Cc:	Williams, Bill
Subject:	EES Model for 6/11


Below please find the opinion of ENA Legal related to the idea of adding additional language to the Transaction Agreement/(Confirm) to make it look more like a loan.  If you have any questions related thereto, please contact Stacy, Jeff Hodge &/or Travis McCullough.

If there are any other outstanding issues, especially related to the cost of funds, please contact me immediately at x37657.

Regards,
Ed

---------------------- Forwarded by Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2001 12:30 PM ---------------------------
From:	Stacy E Dickson on 03/30/2001 12:19 PM
To:	Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	NUI Deal Documentation

Ed and Mark,

As we discussed, I spoke to Jeff Hodge and Travis McCullough about the best way to document this deal.  We all agreed that it is better to document the deal as a deferred payment on the sale of natural gas rather than as a loan.  Documenting the deal as a loan does not add any protection for Enron and in fact, may be detrimental because of the various laws concerning loans and lenders.  The protections  and remedies afforded by the Master track those that Enron would have under a loan document.  Enron would be in no better position to collect from NUI in the event of bankruptcy under a loan document than under the Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement.  Additionally, I assume that NUI, being a regulated utility, will not want to or be able to document this deal as a loan.

Please let me know if you need additional information on this topic.

Stacy


Suzanne:
Please mail me my paycheck when you get a chance.    I'm glad that you had a
great vacation.  We are doing well.  I've joined some tennis leagues at the
club that we belong to and they are alot of fun.  Feel free to stop by some
time this weekend if you are in the neighborhood.  We will be around most of
the weekend.  Charles is doing great and so are the rest of the family.
thank God Bill is home with me.  He is a big help as is Arthur.  Hope to see
you soon.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Suzanne Adams
	08/31/00 02:20 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Paycheck

Hi Carol, I have your paycheck here, but nothing else.  Do you want me to
just send it alone or wait. I know you have it automatically deposited.  Did
you get the picture ok?  How did you like it?  Ric bought me one while we
were in CA (not like yours, but a limited edition).  Those puppies cost
$250!  That was a nice deal toy.

How's everything going?  We had a great time in CA, ate and drank our way
through the wine country.  That's about all my news.

You did get my thank you note for my birthday present didn't you?  Thanks
again!


Chip,
	I just want to follow up my voicemail. If you can get with me by the end of the day or first thing tomorrow, I would appreciate it. I am trying to get the Centana Storage resolved and need your opinion/approval on an issue.

Thanks
Joe


I think it would be a good idea for them to talk, but I wouldn't want Jeff to
go to California right now.  Maybe they could meet outside the state (if, for
example, brown is going to be in DC or New York) or by phone.

From: Joannie Williamson/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/13/2001 08:36 AM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron

cc:

Subject: FW: Meeting with Mayor Willie L. Brown, Jr.

Wanted you to be aware that Mayor Brown is inviting Jeff to meet with him,
either in San Francisco or elsewhere.  Please advise, but I know that Jeff
would probably not travel to California.

Mark Koenig and Andy Fastow will discuss meeting with Mayor Brown on the
CalPERS issue.

Thanks,
Joannie

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Michael Moyer <mamoyer@pacbell.net>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Michael+20Moyer+20+3Cmamoyer+40pacbell+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENR
ON.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 3:50 PM
To: Skilling, Jeff
Subject: Meeting with Mayor Willie L. Brown, Jr.

Dear Mr. Skilling,

On behalf of Mayor Willie L. Brown, Jr. (San Francisco), it is my
pleasure to invite you to meet with him regarding energy issues in
California.

Mayor Brown wishes to meet with you in his capacity as a trustee of the
Board of Administration of the California Public Employees Retirement
System (CalPERS).  As you know, CalPERS is the largest public pension fund
in the
nation and is a sizeable investor in domestic energy stocks, bonds,
debentures, etc.  The Board has appointed Mayor Brown to lead a
delegation of trustees to meet with the CEOs of CalPERS' largest energy
holdings.  Enron represents one such holding.

The Mayor would be pleased to host you in his office at the newly
renovated City Hall in San Francisco or arrange an alternative location at
your earliest convenience.  I
will await your response.

Sincerely,

Monique Moyer
Director, Mayor's Office of Public Finance
City & County of San Francisco


John,

A dangerous environment is brewing on the trading floor.  We have very large positions and people are becoming more frustrated with the work environment, uncertain about future employment and now with new information about Lay's "golden parachute", I am concerned that not everyone may act in the best interest of the Company (hero or zero attitude) or at a minimum may not be in the best frame of mind to trade.  I hate to suggest it but do you need to reduce the people allowed to take risk for the Company? (similar to what was done when we sold HPL).  The general feeling is that everyone at the top is taking care of themselves and the "little" people that have been making the money for the Company are left out in the cold.  I also suggest that you move quickly to ensure appropriate compensation for key traders into next year.

I know the first move I suggested would have the effect of reducing morale further but this group has a lot of risk on for people that may not be 100% commited to Enron.  This may be too drastic action at this point but I think it should watched closely.


As part of your preparation for the RUG meeting on Wednesday and Thursday,
please conduct an individual review of the Protocols Implementation Plan items
e-mailed by Vikki Gates on Sunday.  We will begin our review of the PIP on the
afternoon of the 6th .  In particular, the list below identifies PIP items
that
require a review by RUG because of a potentially significant change in
Protocol
language.

Item 103 - Default QSE
Item 107 - Uninstructed Deviation Tolerance Limit
Proposal by Floyd Trefny
Item 108 - Sub QSE (payment process, invoicing, and liability)
Proposal by C. Moseley
Item 109 - DC Tie (Oklaunion exclusion)
Proposal by Richard Ross
Item 120 - Local Balancing Energy Premium
Proposals by Don Blackburn and Manny Munoz
Item 126 - Plant vs. Resource Specific Output in OOME
Items 144 and 200 - LSE/QSE allocation of AS
Proposal by B. Jones
Item 146 - Notification vs. Posting of Loss Factors
Item 187 - TX SET Concurrent Processing Approach
Proposal by B. White
Item 204 - EPS Meter Data Transmittal
Proposal by J Cohea

In addition to to these items, the Protocols may have been changed to correct
unclear language or an inconsistency in the Protocols in an effort to
reconcile
a gap.  These changes were identified in the PIP Master List as refinements
and
carried a criticality assessment of 1.  I recommend your attention to these
items as well.

As there are about 100 PIP Items, we will not specifically address each one.
However, all parties are encouraged to raise questions or challenge any of the
reconciliation documents at the RUG meeting.

-- Brad


Winston,
I am sending you the documentation on the new methodology for creating ffvols
from implied vols. This methodology requires some minimization procedure
to fit the given vol curve with a smoothing function. I am sending you the
code I wrote that performs minimization with simulated annealing method from
Numerical Recipes.

We might need to discuss some details. Please, let me know if you have
questions.

Tanya.


Start Date: 1/24/02; HourAhead hour: 7;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000
04:37 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Maria Sandoval                           04/13/2000 01:29 PM

To: Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S
Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT,
patty.soria@halliburton.com, elizabeth.gutierrez@eott.com, Judy
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, amolina@unifirst.com,
apena26@hotmail.com, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Barreda/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Yolanda Pena/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: FW: : Rescuing Hug

---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000
01:29 PM ---------------------------

Yolanda Sandoval <Yolanda.Sandoval@Halliburton.com> on 04/13/2000 01:18:50 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: FW: : Rescuing Hug

Yolanda Sandoval
KBR Legal Dept.
713-753-5986
yolanda.sandoval@halliburton.com

 <<RESCUINGHUG.JPG>>

 - RESCUINGHUG.JPG


A couple of people have asked me similar questions that I'm not sure I
wanted to spend a lot of time on tommorow but that others would probably
find interesting.

> In class we talked about how monetary policy had no discretion when
> interest rates are fixed (they essentially have to follow the lead of the
> country you are fixing to). But we also talked about Argentina (or Brazil?,
> I don't have my notes with me) fixing to the dollar, but that interest rates
> were still higher because of the risk factor. Can you explain a bit more
> about how those two coexist?

also.....

> 1.      What is the difference between pegging your currency versus having a
> fixed exchange rate?  I assumed they were the same and that the only option
> available to countries that pegged/fixed exchange rates was to
> devalue/revalue their currency in specific situations - but NOT have the
> ability to change interest rates since their currency is fixed  But time &
> againg, you read (in the FT) about countries (with pegged/fixed systems)
> making a trade-off between changing interest rates (which I understood was
> not allowed) or devalue/revalue their currency.  Also, does the presence of
> a currency board versus having a central bank make a difference?  This is
> especially confusing in understanding the effects of Argentina peggin to the
> dollar and it's impact......

First pegged exchange rates are the same as fixed exchange rate.  A
currency board goes further by promising by law that you will not change
the fixed rate (ie devalue).

In reality, r = r* does not hold perfectly.  It is a simplification
which we use to explain why under a fixed exchange rate system monetary
policy is inneffective...that there would be infinite capital flows to
the country with a higher interest rate.  I would read through Mankiw p
315 to 318 for a discussion on the risk premium which addresses your
question.

Now, the situations you refer to where a country chooses between
devaluation or raising interest rates occurs because a country is
drawing down its foreign reserves and despite the fat that r = r*, money
is flowing out. You can think of this as the introduction of a risk
premium, theta.  So that r = r* + theta. So r must now be raised in
order to preserve the capital flow equilibrium.

Without foreign reserves the central bank cannot honor the fixed
exchange rate.  Its choices then are either to raise the interest rates
sharply to preserve the currency or to devalue thereby raising net
exports and making it more expensive for foreigners to sell the domestic
currency (ie pesos) for dollars.  In the Mexico example in Mankiw, the
country did not raise rates and was eventually forced to devalue.

Often the idea is that a country should take the step to devalue before
it is in a crisis situation if it is not willing to cause a recession to
keep the exchange rate fixed.  This is what the IMF advised the Asian
countries months before the crisis.  They did not want to because of
credibility issues and fears that devaluing itself might precipitate a
crisis and raise the risk premium.  The problem is that if you wait too
long it becomes a fate accompli.

A currency is advocated by some because it replaces the central bank
with "a cash register" and solves the credibility issue.  The main
drawback is that you may have to cause a recession to honor your
exchange rate.


---------------------- Forwarded by J Mark Metts/NA/Enron on 10/25/2000 07:45
PM ---------------------------
From: Tim DeSpain@ECT on 10/25/2000 04:57 PM
To: J Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rating Agency Talking Points

Please see attached revision pursuant to our meeting earlier today.  Let me
know if you have any questions or comments.

Tim


My fault.  I should have sent this out this morning.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000 05:50
PM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/28/2000 08:43:05 AM
To: " - *Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com" <Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com>, " -
*chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *cfrankl2@enron.com" <cfrankl2@enron.com>, " -
*joan.veselack@enron.com" <joan.veselack@enron.com>, " - *vversen@enron.com"
<vversen@enron.com>, " - *cindy.vachuska@enron.com"
<cindy.vachuska@enron.com>, " - *cora_pendergrass@enron.com"
<cora_pendergrass@enron.com>, " - *mmitche2@enron.com" <mmitche2@enron.com>,
" - *scott.goodell@enron.com" <scott.goodell@enron.com>, " -
*steve.gillespie@enron.com" <steve.gillespie@enron.com>, " -
*cgarcia@enron.com" <cgarcia@enron.com>, " - *despey@enron.com"
<despey@enron.com>, " - *joann.collins@enron.com" <joann.collins@enron.com>
Subject: CES Daily March Requirements for 3/28 and after

The attached file contains our daily volume requirements for
and          .    There are two worksheets:  The one labelled with today's
date
contains the volumes that we need at each of the delivery points indicated.
The schedulers will want to check this sheet to see how much gas is needed at
a
specific point.

The sheet labelled 'Daily Change' shows the change (increase +/decrease -) in
the requested daily volume relative to a prior value.  For the current gas
day,
the change is an intra-day change and is calculated using the previous day's
volume request for the current day (e.g., If the current gas day is 3/28, then
the change is computed with respect to the 3/27 request for 3/28).  For
tomorrow's gas day and any subsequent ones shown, the change is computed using
the First-of-the-month volumes requested for those days.  (e.g., If today is
3/28, then the change for 3/29, 3/30, etc. is computed with respect to the
first-of-the-month volumes for those days.)   This sheet should be useful in
determining prices for daily changes in gas volumes that we take or turn back.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03-28-00 daily vols AM.xls


Another Utility Bailout Should Leave Us Cold
George Miller
Sunday, December 31, 2000
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/12/31/E
D134916.DTL
OUR CURRENT energy problems are urgent and serious. But before the governor
and the Public Utilities Commission cut yet another deal costing consumers
billions of dollars, perhaps they should pause to ask the public what kind of
system it wants and what it will end up with after investing billions more.
Failure of energy deregulation could speed real deregulation that might
benefit consumers with real capacity and real competition. But this will not
happen if the focus is only on California utilities and their shareholders.
The original deregulation deal was designed, as I see it, to keep competition
out of California -- and to maximize the rates consumers would pay for every
bad past business decision by PG&E and other California utilities.
Similarly, current bailout discussions are about forcing California
ratepayers to pay for the failed deregulation plan designed by the utilities
themselves. Once again, the companies seek to maximize profits and socialize
the losses.
Following on the heels of California's deregulation, the state's utilities
came to the congressional delegation and urged us to protect the plan from
federal deregulation efforts. They argued that the deal they cut was good for
all parties. Their executives repeated time and again that they might benefit
from the plan's cap on consumer prices -- and that there was a risk to them
if wholesale prices were to go up.
This, they told us, is the marketplace. They were willing to absorb the risk.
This was the brave new world of free markets.
But markets are never free. From the beginning, this deregulation plan was
designed to buy the California utilities time and advantage. Initially,
consumers saw lower rates, but not as low as real competition might have
provided when compared to the heavily sheltered market of the past five
years. Now, because this rigged marketplace has failed, the utilities want
again to put their hands into the ratepayers' pockets.
At first, PG&E and Southern California Edison asked the Public Utilities
Commission to have California consumers pay the entire cost of deregulation's
risks. Their idea did not pass the smell or the laugh test.
Now the utilities look for a way to repackage their old proposal, including a
substantial rate increase. The rationale is that the utilities may collapse
financially. This threat is supposed to inspire Gov. Gray Davis and the PUC
to quickly put the ratepayer on the hook for the utilities' failures.
During the past year, dozens of utilities have merged all across America.
PG&E, for example, may not be worth much to its shareholders, but like AT&T,
it may be worth something to its competitors. This is the genius of the
American marketplace.
PG&E shareholders bought the stock, assuming the risk. Why should the
ratepayers be asked to insulate them from that risk? During this past year,
tens of billions of dollars of market capitalization were lost by various
Silicon Valley high-tech firms. Their shareholders do not get the benefit of
going to the PUC and getting a taxpayer bailout.
The ratepayer has already paid for this energy under a contract that
utilities struck with the people of the state of California. Any additional
payment by the ratepayer is a financial bailout. Any prudent investor would
ask what the return will be before handing over billions of dollars. The
ratepayer deserves an answer, as well as some equity or other consideration.
George Miller is a Democratic congressman from Martinez.


Cary,
I apologize for the tardiness of this response from TNMP. TNMP and First Choice Power will be ready to send and receive 824s when the 867 contengency begins.
Thank you,
Diana Rehfeldt
both hats
----------
From:   careed@aep.com[SMTP:careed@aep.com]
Sent:   Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:28 AM
To:     Schrab, Heidi
Cc:     set@ercot.com
Subject:        Re: 824 Readiness Survey

So far, we have only heard from ESG and Reliant regarding their readiness.

Cary Reed
Sr Business Standards Consultant
918 594 4026 audinet 700-4026

        "Schrab, Heidi" <Heidi.Schrab@greenmountain.com>

01/03/02 09:33 PM

        To:        <set@ercot.com>
        cc:
        Subject:        824 Readiness Survey

Please respond to Cary (careed@aep.com) and me, the results will be
announced on the change control call next week.
Thanks - Heidi

TDSPs:  when will you be able to receive 824s direct from the CRs?

CRs:  when will you be able to send 824s direct to the TDSPs?


Thank you.  i don't need the value.  I just need the sitara transport report
so that I may check the physical positions.

Mike


Do you prefer that I take out the added language for future agreements?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rapp, Bill
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 4:44 PM
To:	McConnell, Mark
Subject:	RE: confidentiality agreement

Mark,

	This looks fine.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McConnell, Mark
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:42 PM
To:	Rapp, Bill
Subject:	confidentiality agreement

Bill,

Attached is the confidentiality agreement that we are signing with Aquila.  It was originated out of our legal group but Aquila added:

	2. 	(iv)
	7.  	"for a period of two years."

I would like to use it for Reliant too.  Any problem with that?  Please let me know.

Mark

 << File: Aquila confident 11-01.doc >>

Mark McConnell
Transwestern Pipeline Company
713-345-7896   office
713-822-4862   cell
713-646-2551   fax
mark.mcconnell@enron.com


<title>iConnectHere Newsletter</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

 October
 2001, Issue 5

  Dear Andrew,

We at iConnectHere would like to express our deepest sympathy to
 our customers and to those affected by the tragedies in the United
 States last month. Despite what has happened, we are focused and
 committed to our customers and will continue growing strong as we
 get through this difficult time. If you would like to help support
 relief efforts of the American Red Cross, please click
 here.

We've Done It Again? Rate
 Reduction

 Use your iConnectHere account as a Calling Card and save up to 20%
 worldwide. Call the US for as low as 5.9 cents! We're always looking
 for ways to help you save?click
 here to see our new low rates.

Take
 our survey

 As we continue to improve our products and features, we would like
 your thoughts, please tell us what you think. Click
 here to take the survey. Your opinions are important to us.

FREE Offer

 Refill your iConnectHere account at anytime and receive $5 FREE
 with every charge of $50 or more. Don't miss out. Click
 here to take advantage of this special offer.

 Payphone Surcharge

 When calling from
 payphones in the US, you must now dial 877-449-5782. Due to FCC regulations,
 all Calling Card calls from payphones in the US will incur a $0.30
 surcharge. Remember, this new number is NOT to be used for regular
 telephone calls, as you will incur unwanted charges. We apologize
 for this inconvenience.

Shop-n-Talk

 Improve your PC-to-Phone sound quality with an Internet handset
 or headset. This month, save 30% on the SC-RIPHAND Internet Handset
 and check out our new Digital Stereo Headset. Start
 shopping.

Get Your Own Number

 V2Phone recently won an innovation award from TMS, a leading communications
 magazine. We are launching a new version of this Broadband phone
 in a about a month with exciting new features. Click
 here to learn more about V2Phone.

Calling All Affiliates

 The Voice Partner Program needs recruits. Open up a revenue stream
 on your website with no setup costs and no maintenance. Earn up
 to 30% commissions quickly and easily! Click
 here for more information.

We Want YOU to Become Our Reseller

 Find your inner entrepreneur. Sign up for the deltathree Reseller
 program and unleash your money making potential. You can start by
 emailing deltathreeReseller@deltathree.com
 and receive additional discount points off your order just for taking
 the first step.

As always, thank you for choosing iConnectHere.

Sincerely,

 The iConnectHere Team

SAVE
 a fortune when you call Asia

 East meets
 West this month when you call 13 countries in Asia. Don't waste
 time, start saving NOW. (Per-minute rate below)

China

 8.9 ?

Beijing, Shanghai

 5.9 ?

China (Mobile)

 12.9 ?

Indonesia

 17.9 ?

Jakarta

 7.9 ?

Indonesia (Mobile)

 29 ?

Japan

 7.9 ?

Japan (Mobile)

 24 ?

Hong Kong

 5.9 ?

South Korea

 6.9 ?

South Korea (Mobile)

 16.9 ?

Malaysia

 9.9 ?

Laos

 59 ?

Philippines

 17.9 ?

Philippines (Mobile)

 20 ?

Taiwan

 6.9 ?

Taiwan (Mobile)

 22 ?

Thailand

 29 ?

Bangkok

 11 ?

To
 ensure your PC-to-Phone phone calls go through, double
 check that you are dialing correctly. Make sure to
 dial: country code + area code (drop first zero)
 + local number + the number EXAMPLES: 442072221234
 (to UK) 12125553456 (to US) 12025553456 (to US).

Forgotten
 your password?
 Click here.

 To
 remove yourself from future mailings click here


Brent:  unfortunately no one from my group will be able to participate in the
Kipp Academy events this weekend.  There was some interest though in future
events.  Thanks.


Hello Tana-   info as requested. Company code=0342  Legal cost code=100 336.
Credit cost code 100 379. Please call me if you ned anything else.

From: Tana Jones on 14/05/2001 09:13 CDT
To: Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Lotus Notes Access

I will not be able get your Legal Group Access until I get their SAP Cost
Center and Company Numbers.  Their Profiles in the system are not complete.


Attached please find a clean copy of the Enron South America Facility
Agreement as well as a blackline showing changes to section 6.1.2.

<<ESA Break-out Agreement  Execution Copy.DOC>>  <<South America
Facility Agreement - Comparison of 9 to 10.DOC>>
 - ESA Break-out Agreement  Execution Copy.DOC
 - South America Facility Agreement - Comparison of 9 to 10.DOC


- Rovner Shayara III.jpg


Main Entry: su?per?flu?i?ty
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Middle English superfluitee, from Middle French superfluit?, from Late Latin superfluitat-, superfluitas, from Latin superfluus
Date: 14th century
1 a : EXCESS , OVERSUPPLY b : something unnecessary or superfluous
2 : immoderate and especially luxurious living, habits, or desires
Bottom of Form 0

Kate Symes
Real Time Trading Support
Office/503-464-7744
Cell/503-819-2181
Fax/503-464-7996


I understand that you may be in the Houston office at some point this week.
If so, I would like to get a few minutes on your schedule to talk about South
American Legal staffing issues.  Could you give me a call (713-853-7459) or
drop me an e-mail with what might work for you?  If you are not actually in
the office but have some time to talk on the phone, that would work too.

Thanks,

Mark


Please respond to Here is your next lesson. . . have fun!!

 - Experiencing God Week 5.doc


<<5-08-01.pdf>>

Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
Phone:(916) 319-2005

 - 5-08-01.pdf


Vince,

Please send me the title and abstract of your talk as soon as possible so
that I could make the announcement soon.  Thanks.

Shijie

Shi-Jie Deng
Assistant Professor
School of ISyE
Georgia Institute of Technology

Office Phone: (404) 894-6519
E-mail:       deng@isye.gatech.edu
Home page:    http://www.isye.gatech.edu/~deng

> On Thu, 4 Oct 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
>
> > Shijie,
> >
> > I talked top my recruiting people, but their schedule is full and they
> > cannot accommodate a trip
> > to another school this fall. I shall be glad to make a presentation about
> > the Analyst/Associate
> > program and encourage your students to apply.
> >
> > Vince
> >
> >
> >     -----Original Message-----
> >    From:   Shijie Deng <deng@isye.gatech.edu>@ENRON
> >              [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Shijie+20Deng+20+3Cdeng+40isye+2Egatech+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> >
> >
> >    Sent:   Friday, September 21, 2001 8:53 AM
> >    To:     Kaminski, Vince J
> >    Cc:     Shijie Deng
> >    Subject:  RE: visit Georgia Tech and QCF info
> >
> >
> >    Vince,
> >
> >    Have you had the chance to check if your recruiting people could come
> >    with you to meet with our first graduating class of the QCF program?  We
> >    currently have you scheduled to speak in the morning of Nov. 1.  For
> >    the matte of accommodating your recruiting folks' schedule, we have the
> >    folloing dates open for their visiting as well:
> >    Oct. 16, 18, 23 and 25.
> >
> >    Here is the URL of our QCF program info. again:
> >    http://www.qcf.gatech.edu/
> >    Please let me know if you hear anything.  Thanks.
> >
> >    Best,
> >
> >    Shijie
> >
> >    Shi-Jie Deng
> >    Assistant Professor
> >    School of ISyE
> >    Georgia Institute of Technology
> >
> >    Office Phone: (404) 894-6519
> >    E-mail:       deng@isye.gatech.edu
> >    Home page:    http://www.isye.gatech.edu/~deng
> >
> >    On Thu, 13 Sep 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> >
> >    >
> >    > Shijie,
> >    >
> >    > November 1 works for me.
> >    >
> >    > I would come on Wednesday evening  and leave Thursday evening.
> >    > I cannot stay away from the office for more than one day. Does it work
> >    for
> >    > you?
> >    >
> >    > Vince
> >    >
> >    >     -----Original Message-----
> >    >    From:   Shijie Deng <deng@isye.gatech.edu>@ENRON
> >    >
> >    [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Shijie+20Deng+20+3Cdeng+40isye+2Egatech+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> >    >
> >    >
> >    >    Sent:   Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:35 PM
> >    >    To:     Kaminski, Vince J
> >    >    Cc:     deng@isye.isye.gatech.edu
> >    >    Subject:  RE: visit Georgia Tech and QCF info
> >    >
> >    >
> >    >    Vince - I forwarded you the following set of possible dates for
> >    your
> >    >    visit
> >    >    to our school.  Have you had the chance to pick one?  Thanks.
> >    >
> >    >    Shijie
> >    >
> >    >    On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Shijie Deng wrote:
> >    >
> >    >    >
> >    >    > Vince,
> >    >    >
> >    >    > How about Oct. 8, Oct. 9, or Nov. 1, or maybe sometime in the
> >    last
> >    >    week of
> >    >    > September?  Thanks.
> >    >    >
> >    >    > Shijie
> >    >    >
> >    >    > Shi-Jie Deng
> >    >    > Assistant Professor
> >    >    > School of ISyE
> >    >    > Georgia Institute of Technology
> >    >    >
> >    >    > Office Phone: (404) 894-6519
> >    >    > E-mail:       deng@isye.gatech.edu
> >    >    > Home page:    http://www.isye.gatech.edu/~deng
> >    >    >
> >    >    > On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> >    >    >
> >    >    > > Shijie,
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > > Thanks for your message. I  checked my schedule and all the
> >    dates
> >    >    you have
> >    >    > > proposed don't
> >    >    > > work for me.
> >    >    > > Any other suggestions?
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > > Vince
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > >     -----Original Message-----
> >    >    > >    From:   Shijie Deng <deng@isye.gatech.edu>@ENRON
> >    >    > >
> >    >
> >    [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Shijie+20Deng+20+3Cdeng+40isye+2Egatech+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > >    Sent:   Wednesday, September 05, 2001 3:01 PM
> >    >    > >    To:     Kaminski, Vince J
> >    >    > >    Cc:     Shijie Deng
> >    >    > >    Subject:  Re: visit Georgia Tech and QCF info
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > >    Vince,
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > >    How is everything going?  I'd like to check with you to see
> >    if
> >    >    you have
> >    >    > >    decided on which day you'd like to come and give the seminar
> >    in
> >    >    > >    our school.  Thanks.
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > >    Shijie
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > >    Shi-Jie Deng
> >    >    > >    Assistant Professor
> >    >    > >    School of ISyE
> >    >    > >    Georgia Institute of Technology
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > >    Office Phone: (404) 894-6519
> >    >    > >    E-mail:       deng@isye.gatech.edu
> >    >    > >    Home page:    http://www.isye.gatech.edu/~deng
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > >    On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Shijie Deng wrote:
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > >    >
> >    >    > >    > Vince,
> >    >    > >    >
> >    >    > >    > As a follow-up to our phone conversation, I am attaching
> >    below
> >    >    the URL
> >    >    > >    for
> >    >    > >    > our QCF program here at Georgia Tech for your corporate
> >    >    recruiting
> >    >    > >    folks.
> >    >    > >    > http://www.qcf.gatech.edu/
> >    >    > >    > It will be great if we could have your recruiting people
> >    meet
> >    >    with our
> >    >    > >    > first graduating class of the QCF program.
> >    >    > >    >
> >    >    > >    > Regarding your visit, we'd be glad to cover the coach
> >    airfare
> >    >    and
> >    >    > >    > lodging.  How about the first week of October, say on
> >    either
> >    >    10/2 or
> >    >    > >    10/4,
> >    >    > >    > or the last week of October, say 10/30?  The arrangement
> >    would
> >    >    be that
> >    >    > >    you
> >    >    > >    > come in on the evening of a Monday or a Wednesday and give
> >    a
> >    >    seminar
> >    >    > >    on a
> >    >    > >    > Tuesday or a Thursday.  Please let me know what works best
> >    for
> >    >    > >    > you.  Thanks.
> >    >    > >    >
> >    >    > >    > Shijie
> >    >    > >    >
> >    >    > >    > Shi-Jie Deng
> >    >    > >    > Assistant Professor
> >    >    > >    > School of ISyE
> >    >    > >    > Georgia Institute of Technology
> >    >    > >    >
> >    >    > >    > Office Phone: (404) 894-6519
> >    >    > >    > E-mail:       deng@isye.gatech.edu
> >    >    > >    > Home page:    http://www.isye.gatech.edu/~deng
> >    >    > >    >
> >    >    > >    >
> >    >    > >    >
> >    >    > >    >
> >    >    > >    >
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > >
> >    >    > >
> >    >
> >    **********************************************************************
> >    >    > > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> >    >    affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for
> >    the
> >    >    sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
> >    distribution or
> >    >    disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
> >    intended
> >    >    recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please
> >    contact
> >    >    the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
> >    >    enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of
> >    the
> >    >    message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended
> >    to be
> >    >    an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding
> >    and
> >    >    enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates)
> >    and
> >    >    the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on
> >    by
> >    >    anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank
> >    you.
> >    >    > >
> >    >
> >    **********************************************************************
> >    >    > >
> >    >    >
> >    >    >
> >    >
> >    >
> >    >
> >
> >
> >
>
>