Chris,

Hopefully the following points should answer your questions. Feel free to
call me (34292) if you still have any question.

Yvan

1_  We will value Teco as a series of hourly Spread options.
Legitimate points of concern:
a) Are we valuing an index deal or a physical deal?
  b) If it is a physical deal can the plant realistically react on an hourly
basis?

Answer: The deal Enron enters into is based on an spread between PJM index
and the appropriate OIL curve (New York Harbor + basis). However, the trigger
for the default of the contract (which is really what we are concerned with)
is a function of the plant cash flows compared to the debt level. The plant
cash flows depend on the physical operations of the plant and its capacity to
dispatch during the most expensive hours of the year. Therefore the question
of whether the plant can or cannot ramp up quickly enough to dispatch
economically is very pertinent to our valuation.
I would argue that the plant will always (or almost always) be able to
dispatch economically for the following 2 reasons. In the first place, its
operational ramp up time is only 10 minutes. Secondly, the scalar curve we
use is fairly well behaved and doesn,t swing around a mean position (see
graph below), hence allowing sufficient preparation for the dispatchers. The
chances of dispatchers being caught by surprise when prices spike up or down
should therefore be relatively small, and the plant should be able to follow
the real time prices pretty well.

2_ The power curve we use is PJM west. Even though the plant is located in
the south east end of PJM (i.e. the del Marva peninsula), we prefer not to
use the east curve which is too thinly traded to be meaningful.

4_ So far we have only used monthly vol for power. Should we start using
daily vol as well, then the blending formula would be:
'fvol = Sqr((dblMvol * dblMvol * (jDate - jToday) + dblDvol * dblDvol * 15) /
(jDate - jToday + 15))

with  jDate the first of the considered month of dispatch
 dblMvol the monthly vol
 dblDvol the daily vol

6_ We are assuming 50% flat correlation for 20 years (a much more
conservative assumption than 15%). However we run sensitivities where the
correlation goes from 30% to 70%.

7_ Yes, we are deducting all operative expenses from the valuation.
Origination is currently trying to reconcile the differences in operations
expenses between their numbers and those used by credits.

8_ The valuation model (coded by Alex Huang, Research) is based on a
bidimensional tree, and therefore doesn,t use the SPRDOPT function. However,
we checked that the SPRDOPT function from the structuring model and the tree
based model yielded the same values for the spread option.

9_ The strike for the spread option is the sum of the OIL price + the VOM.

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
*********************888

Please send me an excel spreadsheet which depicts the value that you see
associated with the heat rate spread option.  I want to make sure that I
understand exactly how you propose valuing the transaction and how this value
would be booked.  As such, please provide the following detail:

Will we be valuing/booking a series of monthly call options or a series of
daily call options?
What power curve are we valuing the deal against - PJM East or West Hub?
Please send me the current fuel curve that you are converting to $/MWh to
value the deal?
What volatilities are you using to value the options - monthly volatilities
or intra-day volatilities or a blend of the two (if blending please show me
what formula you using to blend the two vols)?
What expiration date are you using, i.e.: for monthly call options the 15th
of the relevant month, and for daily options?
What correlation are you assuming, 15% flat for twenty years?
Are you deducting all operating expenses from the value of the option?
Are you using the "SPRDOPT" Exotic Options function to value the option?
Are you using the $/MWh VOM dollar amount as your strike?
Has Don provided the fixed payment stream?  This stream should be covering
both P&I and not just principal.

Yvan, and Ben, please provide answers to these question via written
correspondence so that their is limited probability of misunderstanding.
Thank you both very much for your time and help thus far.  Furthermore, I
would like to reiterate that RAC's goal, prior to quoting any credit reserve,
is to be 100% confident that: (i) the methodology that is being employed is
consistent among the internal groups; and (ii) the inherent value of the
price risk management contracts matches.  This enables RAC to manage the
associated risk during the life of the transaction both effectively and
appropriately.

Regards,

Christopher


-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Vizcarra [mailto:pav@a-klaw.com]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 3:17 PM
To: jbushee@sablaw.com; kmccrea@sablaw.com; callen@akingump.com;
jweisgall@aol.com; rogerberliner@bcjlaw.com; rcsstl@cdmnet.com;
mbrubaker@consultbai.com; anchau@shellus.com;
keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com; jsmollon@newwestenergy.com;
jlyoung@sempra.com; napedersen@jonesday.com; athomas@newenergy.com;
kmcspadd@milbank.com; hchoy@isd.co.la.ca.us; lgurick@calpx.com;
douglass@arterhadden.com; randy_britt@mayco.com; dmarshall@greggind.com;
frank.cooley@sce.com; glwaas@calpx.com; uwuaregion5@earthlink.net;
fmo@sdcity.sannet.gov; jleslie@luce.com; julesan@aol.com;
mshames@ucan.org; jparrott@sempra.com; kmelville@sempra.com;
riald@kindermorgan.com; bill.mccallum@ci.fresno.ca.us;
btenney@landuselaw.com; ronknecht@aol.com;
furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil; kpoole@adamsbroadwell.com;
mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com; freedman@turn.org; rcosta@turn.org;
bfinkelstein@turn.org; theresa_mueller@ci.sf.ca.us; jjz@cpuc.ca.gov;
chrisw@greenlining.org; joseh@lif.org; Evelyn Kahl; jnnc@chevron.com;
jlondon@gralegal.com; imoosen@gralegal.com; clpearce@duanemorris.com;
phanschen@mofo.com; tmberliner@duanemorris.com; dpritchard@mofo.com;
smoss@hooked.net; epoole@adplaw.com; chilen@llgm.com; jsqueri@gmssr.com;
jbennett@gmssr.com; bloomje@la.whitecase.com; pbray@newpower.com;
rick.counihan@greenmountain.com; thoulihan@mdbe.com; mday@gmssr.com;
jmalkin@orrick.com; edwardoneill@dwt.com; lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com;
jguzman@nossaman.com; whe1@pge.com; ssmyers@worldnet.att.net;
pxo2@pge.com; pat.williams@dhcmail.com; wbooth@booth-law.com;
jerryl@abag.ca.gov; mgomez1@bart.gov; askaff@energy-law-group.com;
pjpowerlaw@aol.com; difellman@energy-law-group.com;
nryan@environmentaldefense.org; rschmidt@bartlewells.com;
rrcollins@n-h-i.org; patrickm@crossborderenergy.com;
tomb@crossborderenergy.com; brbarkovich@earthlink.net;
pmcdonne@wenet.net; pjmuller@ricochet.net; jbradley@svmg.org;
tsmegal@calwater.com; sberlin@mccarthylaw.com; bishop@jrwood.com;
cwrmccv@worldnet.att.net; scottst@mid.org; bill@jbsenergy.com;
cmkehrein@ems-ca.com; jweil@aglet.org; abb@eslawfirm.com;
bpowers@seniors.org; dcarroll@dbsr.com; dkk@eslawfirm.com; ed@clfp.com;
jtachera@energy.state.ca.us; howens@seniors.org;
sgreenberg@realenergy.com; tknox@klalawfirm.com; smutny@iepa.com;
lmh@eslawfirm.com; hodgesjl@pacbell.net; rpernell@energy.state.ca.us;
kmills@cfbf.com; rliebert@cfbf.com; aorchar@smud.org; Michael Alcantar;
jcpaine@stoel.com; mhg@hetrading.com; dws@keywaycorp.com;
hbd@gweiss.com; gerhordt.herbert@msdw.com; cread@steptoe.com;
jogg@jhenergy.com; peter_fox-penner@brattle.com;
DavoodiKR@efaches.navfac.navy.mil; bill.wells@afcesa.af.mil;
ad046@detroit.freenet.org; bob_anderson@apses.com; gdreed@sidley.com;
robert.d.schasel@fritolay.com; cyounger@manatt.com; dhuard@manatt.com;
rkeen@manatt.com; georgeperrault@msn.com; picketse@sce.com;
jsilva@edisonenterprises.com; jherrera@dpw.co.la.ca.us;
LVanWagenen@sempra.com; jbarthrop@powersavers.com; foothill@lmi.net;
fosterbc@sce.com; ljhubbard@sempra.com; ktilton@gralegal.com;
mpatel@brownwoodlaw.com; paul.harris@bridge.com; oshirock@pacbell.net;
natutt@duanemorris.com; j3m9@pge.com; musicamaria@yahoo.com;
derkp@newsdata.com; luluw@newsdata.com; tom.oneill@abnamro.com;
mmattes@nossaman.com; RJP2@pge.com; brb3@pge.com; ell5@pge.com;
jyf1@pge.com; NXK2@pge.com; rrh3@pge.com; alexm@calpine.com;
gtbl@dynegy.com; joe.paul@dynegy.com; honest@compuserve.com;
jyoung@ebmud.com; jon.jacobs@paconsulting.com;
emitchel@angnewspapers.com; jptang@oaklandcityattorney.org;
rbw@mrwassoc.com; dmarcus@slip.net; jeff@hmhresources.com; ed@apx.com;
wendy@econinsights.com; chrism@mid.org; fwmonier@tid.org;
rmccann@cal.net; blaising@braunlegal.com; melanie_gillette@rmiinc.com;
twetzel@thermoecotek.com; Slayman@energy.state.ca.us;
swchurchill@juno.com; jdh@eslawfirm.com; ddavie@hesinet.com;
karen@klindh.com; cpeyton@sacbee.com; thaines@smud.org;
huse@eesconsulting.com; mer@cpuc.ca.gov; awp@cpuc.ca.gov;
cmw@cpuc.ca.gov; ctd@cpuc.ca.gov; bsl@cpuc.ca.gov; dlf@cpuc.ca.gov;
fua@cpuc.ca.gov; jlo@cpuc.ca.gov; jsw@cpuc.ca.gov; jrd@cpuc.ca.gov;
jmh@cpuc.ca.gov; kok@cpuc.ca.gov; kim@cpuc.ca.gov; llk@cpuc.ca.gov;
lss@cpuc.ca.gov; mv1@cpuc.ca.gov; pmd@cpuc.ca.gov; gig@cpuc.ca.gov;
rtf@cpuc.ca.gov; raw@cpuc.ca.gov; sfc@cpuc.ca.gov; car@cpuc.ca.gov;
txb@cpuc.ca.gov; ztc@cpuc.ca.gov; nevillm@hdcdojnet.state.ca.us;
dwrlegal1@water.ca.gov; ath@cpuc.ca.gov; LKristov@energy.state.ca.us;
randy.chinn@senate.ca.gov; firmiyas@dof.ca.gov; rax@cpuc.ca.gov;
rtavares@energy.state.ca.us; mschwebs@energy.state.ca.us
Subject: A.00-11-038 Rate Design Proposal of the Energy Producers and
User s

Attached pursuant to the Assigned Commissioner Ruling in A.00-11-038 et
al is the Rate Design Proposal of the Energy Producers and Users
Coalition.  The proposal includes three attachments:

1.   Prepared Direct Testimony of Donald W. Schoenbeck on Behalf of the
Energy Producers and Users Coalition and Rate Spread and Rate Design
Proposal (Schedule 1).

2.    Schedule 2:  EPUC ACR Template for Southern California Edison
Company.

3.    Schedule 3: EPUC ACR Template for Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.

Should you have any problems opening the attached documents, please let me
know.

Phil Vizcarra
Alcantar & Kahl LLP

 <<EPUC Rate Design Testimony .doc>>  <<Exhibit DWS Schedule 2 EPUC Rate
Design Testimony .doc>>  <<Exhibit DWS Schedule 3 EPUC Rate Design Testimony
.doc>>

 - EPUC Rate Design Testimony .doc
 - Exhibit DWS Schedule 2 EPUC Rate Design Testimony .doc
 - Exhibit DWS Schedule 3 EPUC Rate Design Testimony .doc


We are pleased to present you with a 2001 Special Stock Option Grant Award.  As a participant in this grant you have the opportunity to share in the ownership of Enron and the potential profit from increases in the value of Enron's common stock.

The 2001 Special Stock Option Grant was made to let you know how valuable you are and to recognize your contributions in making Enron the great company it is today.   Although there are no guarantees as to Enron's future stock performance, we believe that an Enron stock option has tremendous future growth potential.  The value you ultimately receive from your options will depend on the price of Enron stock at the time you exercise your options.

You can access your 2001 Special Stock Option Grant Agreement and the Stock Plan document governing the grant via your eHRonline account on the intranet website at http://ehronline.enron.com.  Unlike stock options granted in the past a copy of your grant agreement will not be mailed to your home address.

Additionally, the following information regarding the 2001 Special Stock Option Grant can be found on the HR website http://hrweb.enron.com.

?	2001 Special Stock Option Grant Highlights
?	2001 Special Stock Option Grant Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
?	A "How to Exercise Options" document that contains contact information and PaineWebber forms applicable to your stock options

Please take time to review this material.  It is important to us and to you.  If you have any questions, please contact your Human Resources representative.


Is this a new request?   Please call me to discuss.

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America, Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	09/19/2000 02:20 PM

		 To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: updated authorised trader list

are you handling?
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000 02:19 PM -----

	Laurel Adams
	09/19/2000 12:51 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: John Weakly/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: updated authorised trader list

Sara,

We will need John Weakly added to the authorized trader list for ECT
Investments and ENA (similar to Selena Gonzales and David Vitrella)  Please
let me know what info you may need from me to make this happen.  Thanks for
your help!


Wes, do you have the first cut?  John you need to have some input.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001
05:09 PM ---------------------------

Greg Whalley
02/01/2001 04:47 PM
Sent by: Liz M Taylor
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Hillis/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: 2001 Goals & Objectives

Dave,

Greg is requesting Enron Americas' 2001 Goals & Objectives (no more than 3 to
4 each) asap.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor x31935


They are selling gas from Montebello.

They have been given authority by the PUC to begin taking steps to sell from the remaining two (Alsio and La Goleta), but the PUC left some issues (principally around ratemaking) open, and have not given them the authority to actually begin selling the gas.  SoCal would like to start selling around Oct. 1, so they're expecting (hoping for) a decision in early September.  However, the state-run consumer group (ORA) and TURN have asked the Commission to require SoCal to retain two-thirds of the gas and sell it to the core at book value--unclear where the Commission will come out on that.

If there's anything else, let me know.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 10:44 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	Socal Storage Projects

Can you provide the West Desk with an update on the Socal Storage projects-Socal Montebello Salvage Project ;Alsio Canyon and Lo goleta Cushion Gas Projects  Would like to  have something by this afternoon if possible.


Even though it is pretty frequent that this does happen (1 out of 25 masters)
I think it would be fine to add this into Library.doc.  I am working on a
revised draft that I hope to distribute to the group, so if you have anything
else you want entered, forward it on to me.

	Robert Bruce@ENRON
	Sent by: Robert Bruce@ENRON
	08/28/2000 04:03 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:


Marlene,  I am not sure what you are asking me to do.  If these contracts are
active then they should be put into whatever is the proper contract tracking
system for these types of services contracts (transport, pooling, etc.).  If
they are not active and are of no value, then they probably should not be put
into the database.  However, this is not a legal question, but a business
question.  If the business decision is made that they are of no value and
inactive, then they should be terminated in accordance with their terms.

Let me know if I am missing the point of your question.  If I am not, then I
will return these contracts to you.

	Marlene Hilliard
	07/07/2000 12:17 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, /HOU/ECT
		 cc: Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: CES-Active Contracts Not Setup in Global Contracts

Gerald,

I have 62 contracts in  a box that I will be routing to you for your review.
These are active Columbia Energy Services Contracts that are not setup in our
Global Contracts system.  We would like for you to make a legal determination
whether to setup the contracts in our system or not.  Attached please find a
spreadsheet to indicate whether or not to setup these contracts and your
comments.

Once completed, please forward the spreadsheet back to Sylvia Campos.

Marlene Hilliard


You and Eldon want to stay at my apartment on Sunday night? I thought we
rented beach towels there.

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	03/23/2001 09:42 AM

		 To: Cameron <cameron@perfect.com>, Jeff Dasovich <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>,
"Prentice @ Berkeley" <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers
<PSellers@pacbell.net>, Scott Laughlin <scottwl@hotmail.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: mex

do I need to bring beach towels?  I can't remember
Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


Jim:

Attached is a fairly distilled summary of the projects Enron's offered to the
utilities, DWR and the ISO over the past 9-12 months, or so.  With respect to
the power contracts offered to the IOUs, only the offers accepted by PG&E and
Edison are included---the desk doesn't keep records of offers rejected, only
offers accepted.  However, I'm fairly confident that I can dig deeper and get
more info on the other power deals offered to Edison, PG&E and SDG&E if folks
would like that information.  Just let me know. Prices are included for the
offers that had prices attached when submitted.

Best,
Jeff


(See attached file: HPLN0322.xls)

 - HPLN0322.xls


Brilliant work.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/05/2001 11:19 AM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, ken@kdscommunications.com,
Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>, hgovenar@govadv.com, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: DRAFT Principles for Use with Possible Coalition

We discussed on Friday the need to draft some basic, core principles that
could unite a large, broad base of consumer (and other) support in the
on-going effort (to quote today's WSJ editorial)  to inject some "brains"
into California's "no brains" proposals.

Here is a first whack.  It draws from the one-pager drafted last week for use
in Sacramento to describe our "constructive proposal."  Many thanks to Paul
for his help.  The document is in "strike-out-underline" mode.  Please edit
directly (and freely) and send back to me and Ken.

Best,
Jeff


Once again it is time to begin the nomination process for Enron's Chairman's Award.

For those of you who are new to Enron, the Chairman's award is an employee-driven award designed to recognize Enron employees who make a difference in our organization by demonstrating our core values - Respect, Integrity, Communication, Excellence - in everything they do.  These individuals are the Everyday Heroes who make Enron a great place to work. They capture the spirit, the philosophy and the day-to-day business practices of our company in their work, their attitude and how they regard their colleagues.

This award program will only be as successful as your participation in it.  All Enron employees can nominate fellow employees at any level - from the top down or the bottom up.

Nomination forms will be available around the world.  Find the forms on your intranet site or at home.enron.com <http://home.enron.com>.  Direct any questions to mbx_chairmansaward@enron.com

The nomination process is simple.  Complete and submit the nomination form by Wednesday, October 10, 2001.  This year's Selection Committee will then review all nominations and present recommendations to the Office of the Chairman for final approval.

The Chairman's Award winner and finalists will be announced at the annual Enron Management Conference in San Antonio, Texas on November 16, 2001.

I want to personally encourage each of you to think about your colleagues, their contributions to Enron and their adherence to our values.  If there is someone you know who is one of our many "everyday heroes" and you think they deserve to be recognized for their dedication and commitment to Enron's values, now is your turn to speak up?so please take the time to nominate someone you know for this very special award.

I look forward to learning more about our outstanding employees here at Enron and thank you for your participation.


I am sending Twist out today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Singer, John
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 1:13 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Cc:	Franklin, Mary Theresa
Subject:	Contract for Martin Twist Energy

You please prepare a contract for:

Martin Twist Energy Co., LLC
530 West Main Street; Suite 500
Louisville, KY  40202
PH:  502-585-3800
FX:   800-598-9478
Contact:  Lonny G. Armstrong

Effective Date:  July 1, 2001
Period:  Month to Month - Evergreen
Price:  100% of the Inside FERC index price for spot gas delivered into Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.
Location:  Meter:  818727
Pipeline:  CNR
Estimated Volume:  10 Dth/Day

This meter was purchased by Martin Twist Energy Company, LLC from Ridgeland Energy, LLC, Betty Quick Agent effective the 27th day of June 2001.


Dear Jeff,
Our records indicate that your subscription to California Energy Markets is
due for renewal.
Please let me know if you would like to renew or if you have questions
regarding the renewal.
Sincerely,
Stephanie E. Taylor


First, it's always a great pleasure to see you two in person, even with a
brace.  Second, I apologize for all the time you folks are having to spend on
this kind of stuff.  Second, this is a great answer, though, as we discussed,
I think it provides dear Norm with too much information.  Susan's the boss,
but if deleted everything after "Our west flow mainline capacity is 1.09
Bcf/d,"  that (for what it's worth) would seem dandy to me.  Finally, I've
been informed that it doesn't look like drinks will work tonite; but what
about lunch tomorrow?

Best,
Jeff

Jeffery Fawcett@ENRON
06/15/2000 10:29 AM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, mbaldwin@igservice.com, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Pedersen inquiry

Hey gang,
I've taken the first stab at answering Norm's inquiry... give me your
thoughts.  Also, Susan, what is the protocol for a case being litigated at
the CPUC for inquiries like this?  Should we put a disclaimer that the
information we might provide is protected under Rule 51 or other "settlement
discussions only" protection?

Mr. Pedersen,
First, I'd like to clear-up the nomenclature being used here.  As you know,
currently SoCalGas doesn't assign "primary rights" to deliveries off of any
interconnecting pipeline.  The establishment of tradeable rights for
intrastate capacity is among the issues currently under consideration in the
CPUC proceeding.   However, if what you are asking about is what has been the
historical or otherwise available receipt capacity for Transwestern
deliveries at North Needles, then let me offer the following.

Transwestern has always operated on the premise that SoCalGas could
physically accept up to a maximum of 750 MMcf/d at its North Needles receipt
point.  Consequently, Transwestern has sold firm transportation to its
interstate customers for west flow deliveries to North Needles not to exceed
the 750 MMcf/d limitation.  Our west flow mainline capacity is 1.09 Bcf/d.
The 340 MMcf/d difference between the mainline capacity and the physical
capacity into SoCalGas at North Needles is used to provide firm service at
our other delivery points at or near the California border, including PG&E,
Mojave, Southwest Gas, Citizens Utilities, and in the near future, directly
connected electric generation plants.


You're gone for day!
Bummer man

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parks, Joe
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:57 PM
To:	Hayden, Frank
Subject:

hey, give me a call when you get a minute

joe
39636


I have attached a draft for a Prepaid Swap. This deal needs to be structured
in such a way that the Fixed price is payed once, and the floating price is
then paid every month. Please let me know if I can use the attached Draft.

If you have any questions please give me a call (ext. 35700).


USCAA Track & Field Championships, June 9, 2001
The Enron Running Club is seeking runners, sprinters, discus & shot put throwers, and high jumpers & long jumpers to compete in the annual USCAA Track & Field Championships on Saturday, June 9th at Rice University.  Participate in co-ed track relays & field events of all ages and abilities; showcase your energy and talents in a challenging, competitive, and fun environment; participate in an Enron tradition since 1994; experience teambuilding and camaraderie like never before!  For more information or to sign up, contact Cindy Richardson at x3-4770 or sprint to:  http://home.enron.com:84/erc/index.html

Heights Fun Run 5K
Join the Enron Running Club at the Heights Fun Run 5K benefiting The Houston Heights Association's Community Projects scheduled for Saturday, June 2nd.  If you're interested in running or volunteering your time, please contact Cindy Richardson at 713-853-4770 or Kelly Lombardi at 713-345-5841.  For more information, run to: http://home.enron.com:84/erc/index.html.

Dad's Day 5K
Join the Enron Running Club at the Dad's Day 5K and 1 Mile Family Walk benefiting The Prostate Cancer Research and Awareness scheduled for Saturday, June 2nd.  If you're interested in running or volunteering your time, please contact Cindy Richardson at 713-853-4770 or Kelly Lombardi at 713-345-5841.  For more information, run to: http://home.enron.com:84/erc/index.html.

Stop by for some Texan BBQ, fresh air and Entertainment at Antioch Park

The Assist The Officer Foundation (ATO), a non-profit organization working independently,  is inviting all Enron employees to come by Antioch Park  on Friday, June 1st from 11am - 1pm and enjoy a delicious plate of BBQ for only $5.  Come and listen to the tunes of KRBE with Gabe, their mobile DJ, and raffles with many prizes will be given away.  Raffle tickets will be $2 each or 3 for $5.  ATO is dedicated to assisting Houston peace officers injured or disabled in the line of duty.  Please come out and support your local law enforcement professionals.

The Caladium plants that are in the huge plant pots throughout the Plaza are going to be replaced and will be available for purchasing on Monday, June 4th for $4.00 in the Plaza by the up escalator from 11 a.m. to 12 p.m..

Join us in Dublin or Honolulu ----Joints in Motion is a marathon training program for walkers and runners that is aligned with a fundraising effort for the Arthritis Foundation.  The Dublin Marathon will be held Oct. 29 and the Honolulu marathon will be December 9.  Please call for more information at 713-529-0800.

Volunteer for the Boys & Girls Club Summer Camp Weekends!!!
Kevin Hannon, Boys & Girls Club board member, invites you to join Enron employee John Cote at a Boys & Girls Club summer camp who is looking for commitment from a FEW GOOD ENRON MEN AND WOMEN:

WHAT: 		2nd Annual Houston Boys and Girls Club / Enron Summer Camp Weekend (2 camps)

WHEN:  	Boys Camp
		Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), June 22 through Sunday afternoon, June 24
		--OR--
		Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), July 20 through Sunday afternoon, July 22

		Girls Camp
		Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), July 6 through Sunday afternoon, July 8
		--OR--
		Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), July 13 through Sunday afternoon, July 15

WHERE:	Willis, TX (75 minutes from downtown Houston -- just north of Conroe)

WHO: 		6-8 counselors per camp to chaperone 75 boys (ages 7-16)

HOW: 		Share all sports activities, including canoeing, hiking, fishing, organizing a talent 			show/bonfire/ghost stories, obstacle course, water balloon fights, softball, basketball, 		archery, football, etc.  (Cooking and clean-up covered by the Houston Boys Club staff.)

CONTACT:	John A. Cote at ext. 33830

SPREAD THE WORD.  SPOUSES & OFFICE COLLEAGUES WELCOME.
LAST YEAR'S CAMP WAS A HUGE SUCCESS!

Volunteers Needed for Bring Your Child to Work Day!

Bring Your Child to Work Day is Friday, June 29

Please email Jennifer Milligan if you are interested in volunteering and indicate your preference in the below activities:

Registration Table
Houston Police Dept / Stranger Danger / Fingerprinting
Outdoor Activities (SPCA pets, Balloon King, kids crafts, etc.)
Business Etiquette class
Business Art (kids' resumes, etc)
Lunch ticket sales/coordination (in Antioch Park)

The Enron Running Club and the Houston Corporate Athletic Association are seeking volunteers to assist at the annual USCAA Track & Field Championships on Saturday, June 9th at Rice University.  There are many volunteer opportunities requiring little or no experience including timers, scoring, lane judges, cheering on athletes and more!  We are looking for employees, families and friends that can contribute a few hours or who are willing to spend the day benefiting a great cause.  If you are interested or would like more information, please contact Kelly Lombardi at x3-8491.

Many volunteers are needed to help with the planned activities for the Enron Children on June 29th.  If you're interested, send your name and phone extension to workperks.enron.com.

Support KidSave and Help Miracles Happen. Every Summer.

Kidsave's  Summer Miracles Program enables orphaned children ages 5 to 11 to travel to the  US and Canada, live with families and attend day camp. The program gives  families who may be concerned about the problems of adopting an older child a chance to meet, get to know and in the best-case scenario, fall in love with a  child. The program gives prospective parents an opportunity to see and evaluate  first-hand the challenges and rewards of adopting an older  child.

In 1999 and  2000 Kidsave and adoption agency partners placed 432 children - 96 percent of  children who participated in the program. Generally, 85 to 90 percent of  children who participate in the program find homes easily through the program.  The remaining 10 to 15 percent require more work.

Kidsave  believes every child deserves a family. We are committed to placing all children  who participate in the Summer Miracles Program in permanent families or  family-like environments.

We are looking  for families to host children, and for others who want to help us make the camp  program happen for these 250 children.   As a non-profit organization, Kidsave depends on donations to raise the  money to bring these children here and find them families.  Please call Tonya Hoppe at 281.286.8948  or tonya@tonya.cc to get involved in Houston's  Kidsave program.

Find Out how to Join The Downtown Club May 29 & 30!
The Downtown Club (formerly The Met-Business & Sports Club)Membership representatives from The Downtown Club will be in the Enron Plaza Tuesday-Wednesday, May 29-30, from 11 am - 1 pm to discuss membership, the new "Signature Gold" program (see attached file for more information), and a new membership referral program.  Don't miss out on this opportunity to join the Downtown Club or to upgrade your current membership.  As a reminder, a $200 initiation fee is required for new memberships.   For more information, contact The Downtown Club Membership Services department at 713-652-0700 or Georgia Fogo, ext. 3-5609.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/siggoldcourses.pdf

Enron and Kidventure Camps are proud to bring you Camp Enron Summer 2001.  Celebrating our third year, Camp Enron  will once again be providing summer camp for children, ages 5-13, of Enron employees and contractors.

This year, camp will be May 29-August 10.  Ten, one-week sessions will be  available and families may choose to attend any or all sessions.  Each camp week is Monday through Friday.

The cost is $150 per week and includes all transportation, field trips and activities.  A deposit of $50 per week is all that is needed to reserve your sessions.   The deadline to register is Monday, May 21.

To register, log on to: http://www.kidventurecamp.com/camp_enron.htm.   Spaces are limited.

Enron parents simply ride to work with  their children and check them in to the Energizer in the morning with the Camp Enron Team.  Enron Campers are loaded on Coach USA Buses and transported to our nearby camp. At the end of the day campers are brought back to the Energizer for parents to check out.

It's that easy!

For more information please contact:

web site: www.kidventurecamp.com
call Kidventure: 713.960.8989
e-mail: camps@kidventurecamp.com

Have News to Share?
To post news or events in Enron In Action, please e-mail your information to EIA@enron.com
no later than 12:00 noon the Thursday prior to the next Monday's mailing.


Chris and Robin,

Besides the storage inventory, we have two transport imbalances that we also will need to sell.  See the below note.

Thanks,
Ruth

-----Original Message-----
From: Wynne, Rita
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Concannon, Ruth
Cc: Garza, Maria
Subject: RE: Revised Letter

I spoke with Doug Wilkinson who is the Controller over at Bridgeline and he confirmed his volumes on the firm contract (96034592) to be 18,159 due ENA and the IT contract (96034796) to be 6,212 due ENA.  He is in agreement that these balances exists on these contracts and that these volumes are due ENA per their records as of today. I also mentioned to him that I knew where the difference was of the 19 mmbtus that we are off (August 2001, meter 843019).   If I need to do anything else, please don't hesitate to let me know.  Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: Concannon, Ruth
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:57 PM
To: Wynne, Rita
Cc: Garza, Maria
Subject: RE: Revised Letter

Rita,

Do you have a contact over at Bridgeline that you can call and get each of these balances reconciled?  Ideally, ENA and Bridgeline need to have the same numbers.  If we cannot agree, we will have to have Chip resolve the differences when he completes the deal.

Thanks for your help and keep me posted,
Ruth

-----Original Message-----
From: Wynne, Rita
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Concannon, Ruth
Cc: Garza, Maria
Subject: RE: Revised Letter

Ruth,

With the adjustments made and the discrepancy that I found and will have corrected shortly, I am within 2 mmbtus of Bridegline's number.  My balance for storage contract  96034600 is 1,930,554 mmbtus due ENA.  My balances for contracts 96034592 and 96034796 are 18,178) mmbtus and 6,212 mmbuts, respectively, both due ENA.  The diference in Enron's number and Bridgeline's number on contract 96034592 is 19 mmbuts I believe needs to be corrected on B/L's side.  If you need any supporting documentation, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thanks,
Rita

-----Original Message-----
From: Concannon, Ruth
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Schneider, Chip; Bartlett, Jeff; Gray, Barbara N.; Jayne South
(E-mail); Mark Ellenberg (E-mail); McMichael Jr., Ed; Sharp, Greg;
Stephen Youngman (E-mail)
Cc: Wynne, Rita; Garza, Maria
Subject: RE: Revised Letter

Chip,

For the letter, we need to change the first sentence in Item #2 to the sentence given below.  This should cover any storage volume differences discovered during our reconciliation and the 24,390 Dth imbalance gas that is due ENA on the transportation contracts.

2.  Bridgeline purchases from ENA the final reconciled gas inventory stored under ENA's Firm Gas Storage Agreement with Bridgeline, currently estimated at 1,930,552 Dth, and the 24,390 Dth total imbalance gas that Bridgeline Holdings owes ENA under Transportation Agreements #96034592 and #96034796.

We will work with the Bridgeline accounting folks over the next few days to get the final reconciled storage balance.  I will let you know ASAP.

Ruth

-----Original Message-----
From: Schneider, Chip
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Bartlett, Jeff; Concannon, Ruth; Gray, Barbara N.; Jayne South
(E-mail); Mark Ellenberg (E-mail); McMichael Jr., Ed; Sharp, Greg;
Stephen Youngman (E-mail)
Subject: Revised Letter

Please let me know your final thoughts and comments this morning by 10:00am CDT, so we can get this letter out.  Thanks.


Hi there.

This is the letter Hancock is willing to give us in exchange for Hancock
getting a security interest in the escrow account. Any comments?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/24/2001 07:00
AM ---------------------------

"PARKER, Isabel" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com> on 04/24/2001 01:47:09 AM
To: "Carolyn Campbell (E-mail)" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)"
<kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)" <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>, "Jack Wallace
(E-mail)" <jwallace@jhancock.com>, "Amy Weed (E-mail)" <aweed@jhancock.com>,
"John Anderson (E-mail)" <jcsanderson@jhancock.com>, "BURKE, Ted (TDB)"
<ted.burke@freshfields.com>

Subject: Pegasus - ENA Entitlement Letter

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.  Thank you for
your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

Further to our email earlier today, please find attached a revised draft of
the entitlement letter, reflecting the comments of the noteholders.

Kind regards
Isabel

 - COMPARE001.DOC
 - NY003701393.DOC


Start Date: 4/1/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040111.txt


i will have him sign the cocktail napkin.


The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by: Kerry Harrington
Expense Report Name: emclaughlin42401
Report Total: $78.00
Amount Due Employee: $78.00
Amount Approved: $78.00
Amount Paid: $0.00
Approval Status: Pre-Approved
Payment Status: Authorized

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Since there will be no Mark Report today (due to the fact I need to catch a plane), The AGA number today was an injection of 15 BCF, with a revision from last week of +10 BCF to bring the total storage to 3.132 TCF or 484 BCF above last year and 313 BCF above the 5 yr average.

Have a great Thanksgiving! See ya Monday!

Mark D. Smith
Manager
Enron North America
713-853-6601
Mark.Smith@enron.com


Karen,
	As requested by Ted, please find attached the latest Counterparty Trading status report of pm 15th Nov.  Please supply a hard copy to Rick.

Thanks.

Andrew Gibbins
Enron Contract Management
Enron House, 40 Grosvenor Place
London SW1X 7EN
Tel:   +44 (0)20 7783 4711
Fax:  +44 (0)20 7783 9240


Attached in the latest draft of the GE-ENA breakout contract.  The lawyers
need a few more items to complete before execution.  Please send to Kay Mann
and copy me on responses.

Jeff/Eric - Please take a look at the e-mail below and help out on the
following...
accurate description of facitliy-pg 1
questions regarding the exhibits
Address for Section 25.1 and 25.3

Jody/Theresa - Please provide the appropriate address for Section 6.7.2
(payments)

Let me know if you have any questions and thanks for your assistance!

Regards,

Eric

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron on 12/18/2000 11:16
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
12/15/2000 07:55 AM
To: Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron, stuart.zisman@enron.com, Billy
Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: City of Austin Agreement and Exhibits

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/15/2000 07:55
AM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 12/14/2000 06:35:27 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Lee. Johnson (E-mail)" <lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com>, "Kent. Shoemaker
(E-mail)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com>, "Roseann Engeldorf (E-mail)"
<roseann.engeldorf@enron.com>, "Cheryl. Lipshutz (E-mail)"
<Cheryl.Lipshutz@enron.com>, "Brett. R. Wiggs (E-mail)"
<Brett.R.Wiggs@enron.com>, "Ben. Jacoby (E-mail)" <Ben.Jacoby@enron.com>,
"Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: City of Austin Agreement and Exhibits

     Attached please find clean copies of the most recent versions of
the City of Austin Agreement and Exhibits, as well as blacklines showing
changes from the last version circulated.

To complete the agreement, we need to include the following:

1. The description of the facility on page 1.

2. The addresses and contacts for sections 7.7.2, 25.1 and 25.3.

To complete the exhibits, we need to include the following:

1. Exhibits H-2 and R need to be added.

2. Do we need to add language to section B of Exhibit A-1?
 <<Comparison of Exhibits to City of Austin Agt. Form to V. 1.DOC>>
<<Comparison of City of Austin Agreement - Versions 2 to 3.DOC>>  <<City
of Austin Exhibits.DOC>>  <<Gas Turbine Agreement Draft of
12/13/00.DOC>>
 - Comparison of Exhibits to City of Austin Agt. Form to V. 1.DOC
 - Comparison of City of Austin Agreement - Versions 2 to 3.DOC
 - City of Austin Exhibits.DOC
 - 00.DOC


A few interesting deals.  Working on some products for Enron's B2B internet
trading site.  "www.enrononline.com"  The site was actually developed out of
our London office.  Enron House is right next door to Buckingham Palace.
Some other trading deals as well.  I usually get a pretty mixed bag of
projects to work.  It has been very busy the last couple of days.

Sophie Therapy?  That sounds extremely interesting.  Is it good for most of
your normal life crisis type issues?  I might need some now and again.

I know you probably told at the party, but as you remember my mental state
was not clearest it could have been.  Are you a student at UT Law?  Forgive
me for my mental lapses.

OK, I have had Yorkshire Pudding and all I remember was a bland bread type
substance.  Now the beef, vegetables, and potatoes sounds good to me but not
sure about the Yorkshire.  Might help to wash it down with a nice pint.

Take care,
Gerald.

	"Sophie Davenport" <sophiedavenport@hotmail.com>
	10/31/2000 10:31 AM

		 To: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Hello!

Dear Gerald,

I'm surprised you were moving at all the day after the party! I'm not to
sure on the Tequila/Cranberry mix either but as you say - it's always good
to try new things, I just wouldn't advise trying it again that's all!  I had
a good time too, wasn't that drunk either by the end which is a bit of an
unusual occurrence for me.
This past weekend we had a party put on by the law school so we went to that
Friday night and then shopped til we dropped on Saturday - my flat mate has
been having a bit of a hard time so I gave her a day of Sophie Therapy - she
seems a lot more relaxed now - I hope it will last. Saturday I also caught a
cold so I've been feeling pretty rough the last couple of days although I
think it's gradually going now so fingers-crossed I'll be okay to party hard
this weekend  - although I've no plans as yet.
Oh, I haven't heard of that band by the way but it sounds good anyway, and
yes I do like yorkshire puddings - how can anyone not - obviously you should
have the full compliment of beef, roast potatoes and vegetables and gravy
(although I'll gladly do without the beef) but they're gorgeous - don't you
think? Hmm.
Anyway, better get on with some work,
have a good week, whatever you're doing, any interesting deals?
Sophie.

>From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
>To: sophiedavenport@hotmail.com
>Subject: Hello!
>Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:06:42 -0600
>
>Hi Sophie,
>
>I like the sound of the Trifle described in your email to Mark.  I will
>have extra Sherry on mine.
>
>How is it going?  I had a great time at the party in Austin and hanging
>with you at the Brown Bar.  I am not sure what I was thinking toward the
>end of the evening by mixing Tequila and Cranberry, but I guess you have to
>get creative when the circumstances require.    I was moving a little slow
>the next day and drive back to Houston wasn't quite as pleasant.
>
>Did you have a good weekend?  I didn't do anything real exciting for the
>weekend before Halloween.  Went to a concert that had 4 bands.  One of them
>is a band from Austin called Vallejo.  Heard of them?
>
>Now tell me the truth.  Do you really like Yorkshire Pudding?  Drop me a
>line when you get a chance.
>
>Gerald
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Ava, I think it is a great idea.  If Shelley is OK with it, would you please coordinate the effort.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Garcia, Ava
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 4:34 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Corman, Shelley
Subject:

When Tangie moved on to her new position she left Chris with $100.00 to have a birthday party for the dept. This is money she had left over from our group.  After discussing with a few other associates it was mentioned this money should be contributed to our fellow Americans that were struck in last Tuesday's attack in D.C. and  N.Y.  I think that's a great idea, maybe we could have a collection jar and add to the $100.00 and then have the company match before sending.  Is this okay with you Lynn & Shelley??

Thanks,
Ava


Hey, Dwight.

Everything is going fine here.  Thanks for your message.  I'm feeling pretty
confident with how things are going.  I have received very positive feedback
from my manager and my employees.  I have learned much from you, especially
related to communication:  recognizing the different types of people,
different ways to communicate.  And, I appreciate the time you've spent with
me.  However, I would like to discontinue our sessions for the time being.
When I'm in need of some "managing expertise" in the future, I will give you
a call.

Again, thanks for working with me.

Daren


> Dear  Brad ,
>
> t was great to speak to you today.  I have provide the instrucitons to
> upgrade ICE to version 7.37.   Please forward these instructions to your
> IT Department.  We are strongly recomending that you upgrade.  It involves
> some major changes.
>
> Please call me if you have any further questions.
>
> Thanks for your assistance.
>
>
> Pamela Anderson
> IntercontinentalExchange
> Phone 713-840-6494
> cell 713-898-8102
> panderson@intcx.com
>
>
> Installation of SP 3 is strongly recommended.
>
> SP 3 remedies existing issues in production and includes new functionality
> requests from the market.
> Functional enhancements to the platform include the introduction of a user
> preference to "Show best
> derived order" for all ICE spread markets, portfolio sort capabilities (by
> strip, by hub, alphabetical, etc.),
> and the ability to send messages to red orders.
>
> A full-scale enhanced client, version 7.37, will be listed along with SP 3
> and will be published to www.intcx.com
> under the "Downloads" link.  In addition, an API client (version 7.37)
> will be published to the same website
> location.  Release notes for SP 3 will be available from that site.
>
> To download The ICE client, follow the steps below:
>
> 1.) Go to the following site: www.intcx.com/index1.html and click on the
> link "Downloads"
> 2.) Enter your ID and Password in the fields provided.
> 3.) Under the heading: Production Environment...ICE Client...  click
> Install ICE p_7.37_s.exe.
>
> Note: Create an appropriate folder in your directory structure to prevent
> over-writing your current production
>  version, if applicable.  Follow the default settings.
>
> To apply The ICE patch, follow the steps below:
>
> 1.) Go to the following site: www.intcx.com/index1.html and click on the
> link "Downloads"
> 2.) Enter your ID and Password in the fields provided.
> 3.) Under the heading: Production Environment...ICE Client Patches...
> click Install
> 5.)  When the File Download window comes up please put the radio button in
> Save this file to disk and save it
> to your local hard drive or LAN.
> 6.)  Once saved, go to SP 3 (on your local drive or your LAN) and double
> click on the SP3.zip file (you will need
> to have WinZip on the local machine).
> 7.)  Extract these files to your C:\Program Files\INTCX\The ICE folder and
> overwrite the current files (you
> must overwrite the current files).
>
> Note:If your ICE folder is named differently than number 7 above,
> overwrite to the appropriate folder.
>
> For Installation Questions -- call The ICE Help Desk -- 770.738.2101.
>
> Pete Van Winkle
> Intercontinental Exchange, LLC
> 2100 Riveredge Pkwy, Suite 400
> Atlanta, GA 30328
>
> +1 770-738-2101
> +1 770-951-5481 (fax)
>
> <http://www.intcx.com/>
> ICE HelpDesk: +1 770-738-2101
>
>
>
>  <<SP3.zip>>

 - SP3.zip


Top Electricity and Natural Gas Executives To Address Tumultuous Changes in Deregulated Markets at Platts' 8th Annual Day of the Trader Conference
Dow Jones Interactive
November 19, 2001

Pushing for public power / Backers say they'll have issue on next ballot
Dow Jones Interractive
November 19, 2001

PG&E CLEANING CONTAMINATED MARTINEZ SITE  - TWO FAMILIES LIVING ADJACENT TO THE SITE HAVE FILED CLAIMS AGAINST THE UTILITY, BLAMING POLLUTION FOR ILLNESSES AND DEATHS
Dow Jones Interactive
November 17, 2001

Reliant to slash rates 17 % when deregulation begins
Dow Jones Interactive
November 17, 2001

Top Electricity and Natural Gas Executives To Address Tumultuous Changes in Deregulated Markets at Platts' 8th Annual Day of the Trader Conference

FERC Commissioner Nora Mead Brownell to Deliver Keynote

Executives with some of the most dynamic companies in deregulated electricity and natural gas markets will address the 8th Annual Day of the Trader Conference, December 5-7 at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas, NV.

The conference is sponsored by Platts, the energy information, research, consulting and market services division of The McGraw-Hill Companies (NYSE:MHP).

Featured speakers include top officers from Duke Energy, Reliant Energy, Aquila, Williams Energy, Coral Energy, Calpine, Allegheny Energy Global Markets, PG&E, Southern California Gas, the New York Mercantile Exchange and others, along with the industry's top strategic analysts.

The conference also includes a panel that will take an in-depth look at how federal regulators are rewriting the rules for the trading market and what that means for trading companies. The keynote address will be delivered by the Honorable Nora Mead Brownell, a commissioner with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

The conference is sponsored by the Platts family of electricity and natural gas market products including Power Markets Week, Inside FERC's Gas Market Report, Gas Daily, Megawatt Daily, Platts Energy Trader and Global Energy Business.

For more information or to register, go to www.platts.com and hit the Day of the Trader banner. You can also call Custom Meetings International at 718-317-6737 or e-mail mailtocmi@aol.com.

Platts is the world's largest and most authoritative provider of energy information and market services, with 17 offices worldwide. Products range from real-time and Internet-based news and price assessment services, to newsletters, market reports, databases, magazines, conferences, research services, geospatial tools and consulting. Platts offerings cover the oil, petrochemical, natural gas, electricity , nuclear power, coal, bandwidth and metals markets. Every day more than $10 billion of trading activity and term contract sales are based on Platts' price assessments. Additional information is available at www.platts.com and www.plattsmetals.com.

Founded in 1888, The McGraw-Hill Companies is a global information services provider meeting worldwide needs in financial services, education and business-to-business information through leading brands such as Standard & Poor's, BusinessWeek and McGraw-Hill Education. The Corporation has more than 300 offices in 33 countries. Sales in 2000 were $4.3 billion. Additional information is available at www.mcgraw-hill.com <http://www.mcgraw-hill.com>.

Pushing for public power / Backers say they'll have issue on next ballot

Public power advocates in San Francisco will have to convince people like Tim Colen that their idea is a good one if they want to go back to the ballot next year and win.

Colen, who lives in the West Portal area, voted against two measures on the Nov. 6 ballot that would have paved the way for a public power system in San Francisco and ended PG&E's monopoly in the local energy market. The company and other corporate interests spent more than $2 million to defeat the effort.

Colen's vote reflected the sentiment throughout the city's conservative strongholds -- among them West Portal and other West of Twin Peaks neighborhoods -- and in the wealthier pockets of Pacific Heights and Sea Cliff. In those neighborhoods, Proposition F and Measure I lost almost 2 to 1.

In the city's more liberal neighborhoods -- Haight-Ashbury, Bernal Heights, South of Market and Noe Valley -- the reverse was true. And in the Mission, support for public power was almost 3 to 1.

"Those were the districts that were focused on because of limited resources," said Board of Supervisors President Tom Ammiano, a public power booster. "Once we engaged people, talked to them, they were very responsive. I think the same thing would have to happen in the other districts when we go forward again."

For Colen, an environmental geologist and consultant, the proposals were poorly drafted, more intent to take a whack at the corporate giant PG&E than to make sure that electricity is delivered to city residents and businesses at a lower cost and more reliably -- as backers of the measures promised.

"San Francisco can get into the energy business," said Colen. "But it should be incremental, with a sound policy, and with people in charge who are experts."

In addition, he doesn't want an elected board running the operation, as both Measure I and Proposition F required, and he wants the city to explore working with PG&E instead of ousting the private utility competely. Then, Colen said, he may support public power.

Proposition F called for replacing the city's existing water and power department with a new, expanded agency to deliver publicly owned electricity to consumers. It lost by 533 votes, or less than 1 percentage point.

Measure I, the more far-reaching of the two, lost by 4,361 votes, or 3.5 percentage points. It would have set up a municipal utilities district in San Francisco and neighboring Brisbane. It made a target of PG&E but also had the power to take over the garbage, cable and phone operations.

Despite the loss, supporters of municipal power expect to resurrect the idea. Ammiano and other backers are exploring how far the city can go to begin public power without voter approval. At the same time, they are considering a way to put the issue before voters again next year.

Bob Lipman, a retiree who lives in Cow Hollow, voted against the two ballot proposals two weeks ago. His chief concern was the lack of documentation detailing the cost of creating a new public power system. "It was a blank check," he said. He also wanted more than a promise that rates would go down.

Supervisor Tony Hall, the West of Twin Peaks representative who opposed the ballot measures, agreed that with more hard facts his constituents might buy into public power if the findings tilted in favor of sound fiscal policy.

"People want to know how much this is going to cost," Hall said.

Ammiano, the author of Proposition F, said he expected the city to conduct feasibility studies that outline costs, generation capabilities, financing options and the benefits and disadvantages of various public power scenarios.

"While I believe we made a strong case for a municipal water and power agency, I think we can take the time between now and next November to provide further study on the issue, explain to voters exactly why public power will work in San Francisco and expand the coalition to include consumer interests, business owners and property owners backing the idea," Ammiano said.

Another factor, he said, is voter turnout.

"If we had 1 percent higher turnout we probably would have won," Ammiano said.

For example, several neighborhoods -- among them the Western Addition, Civic Center and the South of Market -- had turnout lower than the citywide average, which was just less than 30 percent.

Supervisor Chris Daly said the key to win was turning out liberal voters -- not putting efforts into wooing conservatives.

"I truly believe I don't have to change people's minds," said Daly, who favors local control of the electrical system. "I represent the majority opinion. But the majority doesn't necessarily come out to vote. That's what we have to work on."

PG&E CLEANING CONTAMINATED MARTINEZ SITE  - TWO FAMILIES LIVING ADJACENT TO THE SITE HAVE FILED CLAIMS AGAINST THE UTILITY, BLAMING POLLUTION FOR ILLNESSES AND DEATHS

MARTINEZ -- PG&E crews have begun cleaning up the site of a former substation in Martinez, which had high levels of arsenic and lead in the soil.

Crews will begin cleaning up two adjacent properties after the Thanksgiving weekend.

The adjacent property owners and their families blame the contaminants for the illnesses and deaths of family members and filed a claim against Pacific Gas & Electric in bankruptcy court.

The substation cleanup should be completed by mid-December at a cost of $225,000, said PG&E spokesman Jason Alderman. Cleaning up Tom Billecci's and Vince Aiello's properties will cost about $64,000.

Once the substation site is free of contaminants, the utility will sell the property to a developer, who plans to build apartments.

The cost of the cleanup is significantly more than the utility will make selling the property, Alderman said.

"The reason it's expensive is that this is the gold standard of how an environmental cleanup should be done," he said.

The utility operated a substation at the site from 1910 to 1990. The Billecci and Aiello families have been in discussions with PG&E about the cleanup for a year. They claim that the contaminants contributed to family illness including cancer, asthma and skin disorders.

The utility will remove soil on both properties and test the ground to make sure it is free of high levels of lead and arsenic. Contra Costa Health Services Hazardous Materials Program will oversee the cleanup.

PG&E will clean the area around a shed on Billecci's property, something it had not planned to do before.

Billecci said he is pleased that PG&E agreed to increase the scope of the cleanup

Reliant to slash rates 17 % when deregulation begins

Residential customers who stick with Reliant Energy when electricity deregulation begins in January could see a drop in power rates of about 17 percent.

That's according to figures filed Friday by Reliant with the Texas Public Utility Commission.

Under the new so-called price-to-beat rate - which still needs PUC approval - someone using an average of 1,200 kilowatt-hours a month could save $257 over the course of a year, while someone using an average of 2,000 kilowatt-hours a month could save $426 annually.

The big drop is being propelled significantly by lower natural gas prices. Consumers saw two electricity increases in the latter half of 2000 and another this year because natural gas prices had climbed. This year's increase, though, was rescinded as gas prices came down.

The rate Reliant offers residential consumers and certain small businesses come Jan. 1 - when Texas opens its electricity market to competition - is known as the "price to beat." Larger consumers can negotiate contracts with providers.

The price to beat will serve as a benchmark for other competitors, which in turn are expected to offer lower rates.

Other incumbent electric companies, including Dallas-based TXU Energy, will charge their own price-to-beat rates in their service territories.

The PUC wants the price to beat low enough so consumers benefit from deregulation, but high enough so competitors can offer lower rates but make enough profit to stay in the market.

Consumer groups have said the PUC is paying too much attention to competitors' profits and not enough to ensuring consumers get the lowest prices.

To set the price to beat, the PUC uses complex formulas: Costs are sorted into several categories, including a "base rate," as well as costs tied to the price of natural gas, which affects the price of electricity.

Under the deregulation law, consumers automatically get a 6 percent cut in the base portion starting Jan. 1, which, depending on usage, can make up 60 percent of a consumer's costs.

The PUC and Reliant have been trying to agree on the so-called fuel-factor portion of the price to beat.

The figure Reliant filed Friday was to agreed to by the PUC staff and the company. The three-member commission still must give its approval, which it could do Tuesday or at a Dec. 3 meeting.

The current rate for a residential Reliant customer who uses 14,400 kilowatt-hours of electricity in a year - or an average of 1,200 a month - is 10.42 cents per kilowatt-hour.

Under the numbers Reliant filed Friday, the cost would be 8.64 cents per kilowatt-hour. That's a drop of 17 percent.

Those per kilowatt-hour figures are calculated to take into account that customers use more electricity in the summer when prices are higher. Reliant charges different rates for summer and non- summer months and will keep doing so after deregulation begins.

The per kilowatt-hour comparisons compiled for the PUC are annualized, average rates. All providers will break their electricity offers into similar rates so consumers will have an apples-to-apples way to compare them.

Reliant and other existing companies are prohibited from cutting the base-rate portion of the price to beat for three years or until they lose 40 percent of their customers. The price to beat can be adjusted twice a year for fuel costs.

Earlier this week, consumer groups said they were worried that an option being considered by the PUC, if adopted, could artificially raise the price to beat and cause residential consumers to pick up costs that should be borne by larger customers.

That option, which involves fuel costs that utilities are still owed, isn't included in Reliant's filing. A PUC spokesman said one commissioner simply wanted more information about the idea, and it's unknown whether the PUC will ever take an up-or-down vote.

Competitors of Reliant and other existing companies are obviously interested in what the price to beat will be.

In a filing Thursday with the PUC, the New Power Co., which is offering residential service in Houston and elsewhere, said the price to beat will ultimately determine if deregulation succeeds in Texas.

Because there was a sufficient difference between current prices and rates offered by competitors during a pilot test of deregulation, a relatively high number of consumers signed up for new providers during the program, New Power said.

"New Power is optimistic that the Texas market will support vigorous competition, but, like everyone else, we will have to wait and see how the future unfolds," it said.


Please note that an additional subsidiary was included in the sale referenced below:  Orange Service Company, LLC.

Kate B. Cole
Director, Corporate Services
Enron Corp.
Tel: (713) 853-1624
Fax: (713) 646-8007
Email: kate.cole@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cole, Kate
Sent:	16 May, 2001 5:27 PM
To:	Mellencamp, Lisa; Heinitz, Mary; Aune, Stacey A.; Barrow, Cynthia; Bouillion, James L.; Callahan, Teresa; Carnahan, Kathleen; Cole, Kate; Dallman, Larry; Davis, Hardie; Derrick Jr., James; Hu, Sylvia; King Jr., Frazier; Kitchen, Louise; Korkmas, Deb; LaBaume, Wanda; Lavorato, John; Leo, Johnson; Li, Ling; Maxwell, Matt; Moore, Jerry Thomas; Murray, Julia; Perkins, Mary; Pham, Lynda; Pinder, Lori; Priddy, Janice; Rice, Greek; SAP Master Data; Swafford, John; Whalley, Greg; Whiting, Greg
Subject:	Sale of East Coast Power L.L.C.

East Coast Power L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries (as listed below) were sold to El Paso Energy Corporation on February 22, 2001.

Subsidiaries included in sale:
Empire Energy Supply L.L.C.
JEDI Bayonne GP, L.L.C.
Cogen Technologies NJ Venture
JEDI Camden GP, L.L.C.
Cogen Technologies Camden GP Limited Partnership
Camden Cogen L.P.
JEDI Camden LP, L.L.C.
JEDI Linden NB, L.L.C.
JEDI Linden, Inc.
JEDI Linden GP, L.L.C.
Cogen Technologies Linden, Ltd.
Cogen Technologies Linden Venture, L.P.
JEDI Linden LP, L.L.C.
Chelton Service Company, LLC

Evidence is on file in the 48th floor corporate vault.  Please share this information with other interested parties.

NOTE: Sylvia Hu - evidence to follow by hand.

Kate B. Cole
Director, Corporate Services
Enron Corp.
Tel: (713) 853-1624
Fax: (713) 646-8007
Email: kate.cole@enron.com


Start Date: 4/11/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041120.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 20 / Preferred:  10.99 / Final:  10.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


?

?http://www.dailynews.com/opinions/articles/0501/29/edi01.asp
 - Lockyer lockdown.url


Lisa,

Here is the discussion draft of change order #3 for your review, comment,
changes, etc. Once it is finalized ENA would appreciate receiving a note
requesting that the change order be executed, with the change order
initialled by the appropriate person at ESA.

Thanks,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000 10:48
AM ---------------------------
From: Anne C Koehler on 12/08/2000 10:40 AM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Attachments from Doug Eyberg

See Employee Matters issues list prepared by Bidder A.

Anne C. Koehler
Sr. Counsel, ENA
EB 3839
713-853-3448
----- Forwarded by Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000 10:39 AM -----

	"KAREN MADDREY" <KMADDREY@LLGM.COM>
	12/07/2000 05:10 PM

		 To: <dkpenrod@aep.com>, <anne.c.koehler@enron.com>, <awills@velaw.com>,
<CHRIScollins@velaw.com>
		 cc: "DOUGLAS K. EYBERG" <Doug.Eyberg@LLGM.COM>, "DORIS RODRIGUEZ"
<DRODRIGU@LLGM.COM>, "MICHAEL WALLER" <MWALLER@LLGM.COM>
		 Subject: Attachments from Doug Eyberg

This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me by
return mail, e-mail or at 713-287-2017.  The unauthorized use, dissemination,
distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is
prohibited and may be unlawful.

Karen Maddrey, Secretary
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
1000 Louisiana, Suite 1400
Houston, TX 77002
713-287-2017
kmaddrey@llgm.com

 - IT 121 Redline.rtf
 - HPL IT Employee Matters Major Points 127.doc
 - IT clean 121.DOC
 - Consolid.DOC
 - PurOptio.DOC
 - Consenta.DOC
 - IssuesLi.DOC
 - Principa.DOC


The use of cell phones and pagers has increased dramatically in the past few
years.  As a result the Accounts Payable department has seen a rapid increase
in the number of invoices and vendors.  With the higher volume, we have
reviewed our processes in order to continue our rapid payment cycle.

Although we encourage vendors to address their invoices to individual
employees, they often mail invoices directly to Accounts Payable.  At times
they fail to list the individual who uses the pager or cell phone.  In these
cases we return the invoice to the vendor.  If the employee is designated, we
try to track him/her down and forward the invoice.  The high level of
employee movement among jobs and locations at Enron has made this
increasingly challenging.  Either way, we end up doing something less
productive than paying invoices.

To maintain satisfactory response to our vendors and to reduce time necessary
for research, we request that employees who have pagers, cell phones, and
other individually billed items such as licenses, subscriptions, etc., pay
for them by personal check or charge card (if applicable*payment instructions
are usually indicated on the invoice) and request reimbursement through
employee expense reports.

By submitting these charges on your expense report, you can help us reduce
the amount of time spent researching and forwarding invoices, the number of
checks generated by Treasury, the number of vendors in our database, and the
turnaround time for payment of invoices.

Incidentally, Accounts Payable is currently installing a corporate-wide
web-based expense reporting system similar to what Enron International has
used for the past year.  This will make it even easier to file your expense
report and receive quick reimbursement.

We,d like to make this effective immediately.  If you have any questions or
suggestions, please contact the Accounts Payable department.


Please provide me an update on the progress of the working group you have led
this year.  There are several things I would like you to cover in this regard.

Did the working group function through the year or was it terminated (I
recognize there may be good reasons for the latter, but would like to
understand those reasons).

What did the group accomplish?

Would you recommend continuing it?   Any changes?

Are there other topics we should consider for working groups in the future?
Any changes to the working group process itself?

Please provide input on the individuals you worked with.  You should be able
to do this through the PEP system.  If you cannot, please provide the
feedback by confidential e-mail to me.  Because the PRC is coming up soon,
please provide the feedback by December 1.


SBX2 27 (Bowen) passed out of the Senate Appropriations Committee on a
7-5 party-line vote.  In her closing, Senator Bowen said that if the
supporters of direct access do not want to help her with her bill she
would just as soon let if fail.  She also stated that the CPUC was going
to terminate direct access next week.  There was one additional
amendment taken which specifies that DWR must inform customers within 30
days of an inquiry what the projected exit fee will be.


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 04, 2001

Notice ID: 3150
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: CAPACITY UPDATE EFFECTIVE FOR FRIDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2001

               CHANGES ARE INDICATED WITH AN *

Effective Friday, October 5, 2001,  capacities will be as follows:

Excess MDWQ              Available +
ISS Withdrawals          Available
SIT Withdrawals          Available
Imbalance Drawdowns      Available
PAL Lends/Unparks        Available

Excess MDIQ              NOT Available +
ISS Injections           NOT Available
SIT Injections           NOT Available
Imbalance Paybacks       NOT Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks  NOT Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Non-firm receipt capacity will be as follows:

TENNESSEE:

Brinker (B12)            10,000
Broad Run (B9)          125,000 *
Cambridge (B10)          20,000
Dungannon (B11)          20,000
Highland (B17)           15,000

NOTE: GAS RECEIVED AT HIGHLAND MUST BE DELIVERED IN THE NORTHERN PORTION OF
MARKET AREA 38 OR THE NORTHWEST LATERAL OF MARKET AREA 36, DIRECTLY NORTH OF
HIGHLAND.

Milford (B18)            20,000
North Greenwood (B22)         0
Unionville (B15)         50,000

NOTE:  EFFECTIVE THURSDAY, AUGUST 16, 2001, ANY SHIPPER UTILIZING A CONTRACT
THAT HAS A PRIMARY RECEIPT POINT(S) WITH THE FOLLOWING POINTS, MUST UTILIZE
THESE POINTS:

         Brinker       (B12)
         Cambridge     (B10)
         Dungannon     (B11)
         Highland      (B17)
         Milford       (B18)
         Unionville    (B15)

TEXAS EASTERN:

Delmont (C16)                 0
Eagle (C22)              10,000 *
Hooker (C9)                   0 *
Pennsburg (C23)          10,000 *
Windridge (C12)          10,000 *

NATIONAL FUEL:

Independence (M1)             0
Ellwood City (L1)        15,000

TRANSCO:

Downingtown (E3)          2,500
Emporia I (E13)          60,000
Rockville (E2)                0
Dranesville (E1)              0

ALGONQUIN:

Ramapo (R1)              25,000

ANR:

Paulding/Cecil                0 *
(F1, A2)

LEBANON AGGREGATE             0 *
(A4, F2, C4, D3)

TOLEDO AGGREGATE              0 *
(A3, F4, 734462)

COLUMBIA GULF:
(801)

TCO-Leach               400,000 *

Internal point non-firm capacity will be as follows:

Lanham                No Restrictions

Delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

TRANSCO:

Martins Creek            10,000
  (MLI E5)
Young Woman's Creek      10,000
  (MLI E9)

ALGONQUIN:

Hanover                  30,000
  (MLI R2)

EQUITRANS:

Fallen Timber            31,000
  (MLI K1)

Waynesburg-Rhinehart     20,000
  (MLI K2)

OPT-30 will be available in all market areas.
OPT-60 will be available in all market areas.

Market Area delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

Operating Area 1
     Market Area 33       No Restrictions
     Market Area 34       No Restrictions

Operating Area 2
     Market Area 20       No Restrictions

Operating Area 3
     Market Area 15       No Restrictions
     Market Area 16       No Restrictions
     Market Area 17       No Restrictions
     Market Area 18       No Restrictions
     Market Area 19       No Restrictions

Operating Area 4
     Market Area 21       No Restrictions
     Market Area 22       No Restrictions
     Market Area 23       No Restrictions
     Market Area 24       No Restrictions
     Market Area 25       No Restrictions
     Market Area 29       No Restrictions

Operating Area 5
     Market Area 02       No Restrictions
     Market Area 07       No Restrictions

Operating Area 6
     Market Area 10       No Restrictions
     Market Area 11       No Restrictions
     Market Area 12       No Restrictions
     Market Area 13       No Restrictions
     Market Area 14       No Restrictions

Operating Area 7
     Market Area 01       No Restrictions
     Market Area 03       No Restrictions
     Market Area 04       No Restrictions
     Market Area 05       No Restrictions
     Market Area 06       No Restrictions
     Market Area 08       No Restrictions
     Market Area 09       No Restrictions

Operating Area 8
     Market Area 26       No Restrictions
     Market Area 27       No Restrictions
     Market Area 32       No Restrictions
     Market Area 35       No Restrictions
     Market Area 36       No Restrictions
     Market Area 38       No Restrictions
     Market Area 39       No Restrictions
     Market Area 40       No Restrictions

NOTE:  GAS DELIVERED IN THE NORTHERN PORTION OF MARKET AREA 38 OR THE NORTHERN
PORTION OF MARKET AREA 36 MUST BE RECEIVED FROM TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE AT
HIGHLAND.

Operating Area 10
     Market Area 28       No Restrictions
     Market Area 30       No Restrictions
     Market Area 31       No Restrictions

If you have any questions, please contact your Account
Representative.


Did Chris Foster ever get back to you on this? I had asked him to let you
know when he found out, but I wanted to make sure the information actually
got passed along. Let me know when you get a moment.

Thanks,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
04/20/2001 06:16 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: New Broker: Automated Power Exchange

FYI.  Please let us know if we will be receiving broker paper in Houston or
will it come to Portland?
---------------------- Forwarded by Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2001
08:15 AM ---------------------------

Jason Moore
04/20/2001 08:10 AM
To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: New Broker: Automated Power Exchange

The counterparty has been linked to the Power Broker - Houston Group.

Jason Moore

Rhonda L Denton
04/19/2001 04:16 PM
To: Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Broker: Automated Power Exchange

Please link this CP to Enpower with group link of Power Broker-Houston.
Please let me know when completed.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001
04:15 PM ---------------------------
   Kate Symes                04/19/2001 03:25 PM

To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Broker: Automated Power Exchange

P.S. I mentioned this to you, Melissa. But just a reminder that we need the
default broker fee on this to be $.03.

Thank you!
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/19/2001 01:32 PM
---------------------------
   Kate Symes                04/19/2001 01:20 PM

To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: New Broker: Automated Power Exchange

Chris Foster has requested that we set up a new broker - the Automated Power
Exchange, in EnPower. It is the same counterparty we already have in EnPower,
with the same name and contact information. Melissa, I believe you said we
could pretty easily add the name in the broker list if it was the same as in
the counterparty list, which Chris has verified it is. Please let me know if
you need anymore information.

Thanks,
Kate


This is the presentation Mr. Kean will be using on June 12, 2001.  He will
have a CD with him as a backup.

Regards,

Ursula Brenner
ENRON CORP.
+1(713)345-3787

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


Sorry about the email I just sent at 10:49 AM.  Attached is my new schedule reflecting no gas flow on the 9th and 10th.


Merchant Assets has re-revised numbers.  Please disregard previous versions.

Regards,

Eugenio


When: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:00 AM-9:30 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB 3805

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


Thanks - I needed a good smile today.


Vasant,

It think he deserves an offer. Can you write an evaluation for him?

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Muzzy, Dolores   On Behalf Of Warner, Traci
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 10:42 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Cc:	Bosien, Teresa; Warner, Traci
Subject:	Summer Intern Reviews

Summer is quickly drawing to a close for our summer interns.

We have scheduled several departure dates for the interns.  Our records indicate that your summer intern, Kyriakos L. Frantzeskakis, is scheduled to return to school on 8/10/01.

We would like to host a performance review session for all interns who are departing during this same week.

The review session for your intern will be held on August 2nd at 10:00 am to 11:30 am in EB 35C2.  Please bring the completed performance feedback form for your intern to this meeting along with any other feedback from your team members that you may have collected.

We will discuss each intern, cross calibrate their individual performances and decide which interns will receive full time offers.

If you are unable to attend this meeting, please contact me at X33242.

Sincerely,

Traci Warner
Director
A/A Recruiting


Why not point out that we are always adjusting employment levels across our businesses.  We have people leaving as we reorganize or reduce activities in certain areas and we have people moving to other areas or being hired into areas where we are starting new businesses or growing.  We simply have not had the mass layoffs that other companies have announced.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 9:31 AM
To:	Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	FW: layoff statement

What do you think about something like this in response to the layoff question?  It could become our new "standard corporate policy."

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meyer, Vance
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 9:25 AM
To:	Denne, Karen
Subject:	layoff statement

Karen --

Here's the safest statement I know for our situation as it relates to employment:

"We do not speculate about future employment levels.  If and when we have ever have changes affecting employees, we tell them first."

(Of course, we'll need to pretend that we didn't break the Europe layoff on Dow Jones!)

Vance


Had a great time this weekend.  I'm sure glad that Travis got another good
buck under his belt.  I think he is now ready to move it up a notch on the
next deer and if everything stays good at the ranch then it should be pretty
possible next year.

I was also wondering if you and Mama talked about paying Melissa for her
painting.  Mama mentioned to Melissa that she "owed" her but nothing more
than that.  She worked for no less than 20 hours and was disappointed that
she would not be able to do the rest of the house as we really need the
money.  Our negative checking balance needs some injection of cash and
Melissa had hoped to use the money to buy a few things for Christmas this
week as well.   If you haven't already, I'm sure that you can broach the
subject with Mama without letting her know that I asked.

Anyway,  Melissa really wanted to be able to paint more and is upset that she
wasn't able to "prove" to Mama that she is willing and able to work hard.
She still gets those not so subtle jabs all the time from Mama about not
working outside the home.  For the record, she busts her ass keeping our
house clean, clothes washed and ironed, meals cooked, and doing lots of
things to make sure we have a happy, healthy, and well adjusted son.   If
there is a way (later) that you can subtly encourage Mama to hold back on
these jabs when we next visit, it will go a long way toward ensuring a good
Christmas for everyone.

Anyway, definitely keep all of this confidential between me and you.  There
is no major problem here but I wanted to check off with you on this so we can
help keep everything going smooth and folks getting along.   I'm sure you see
my point of view here.

Thanks!

Charlie


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000
07:18 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Doug Leach                           11/29/2000 06:46 AM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael L
Brown/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: The Oil Daily Wednesday, Nov. 29, 2000 (pdf)

---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 06:45 AM
---------------------------

"Energy Intelligence Group, Inc." <eigcirculation@collage.com> on 11/28/2000
07:18:40 PM
To: Doug Leach <doug.leach@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: The Oil Daily Wednesday, Nov. 29, 2000 (pdf)

CUSTOMER SERVICE:
For any delivery problems, or changes in address,
simply e-mail CustomerService@energyintel.com
Please be sure to include full subscriber/company name and
address in your e-mail.

For more information on EIG, visit www.energyintel.com

VIEWING .PDF DOCUMENTS:
Use the Adobe Acrobat Reader to view an attached
.PDF document in its full graphic format, that
is, exactly as it is printed. If you don''t have
Adobe Acrobat Reader installed, you can download
it from the internet: http://www.adobe.com
Follow the links at Adobe''s web site to Acrobat Reader.
Once Acrobat Reader is installed, save the .PDF
document to your disk, open Adobe Acrobat Reader
and then open the .PDF document.
*******************************
Copyright (c) 2000 EIG, Inc.
Reproduction in any form (photostatically, electronically,
or via facsimile), including via local- and wide-area
networks, is strictly forbidden without direct
licensed permission from EIG -- contact
Sales@energyintel.com.
Indirect authorization to photocopy individual
articles or other items for internal and personal
use is granted by EIG provided that the
appropriate fee is paid directly to Copyright
Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers,
MA 01923.  Tel: 1-978-750-8400.

 - de001129.pdf


Subject: FW: Happy Halloween!!

    Happy Halloween!!

BM__13609

 - ATT00022.jpg