---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Gardenfeld/NY/WGM/US on
11/27/2001 08:58 AM ---------------------------

david.kirkland@bakerbotts.com on 11/26/2001 09:49:33 PM

To:   ken.randolph@dynegy.com, keith.fullenweider@dynegy.com, Thomas
      Roberts/NY/WGM/US@WGM, Marita Makinen/NY/WGM/US@WGM
cc:   Joel.Swanson@bakerbotts.com, Sarah.Cooper@bakerbotts.com,
      Tull.Florey@bakerbotts.com
Subject:  revised merger agreement amendment

As I just discussed with Tom, attached is a revised copy of the amendment.
 <<Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger.DOC>>  <<Redline.rtf>>

(See attached file: Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger.DOC)
(See attached file: Redline.rtf)

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (212-310-8000), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.


Stinson,

It should be in the attached message.

Vince

Stinson Gibner
10/30/2000 04:29 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Forward oil prices

I can find someone or else do it myself.    Can you specify the historical
period and also how far out the curve we are providing?

Is it just WTI?

--Stinson


Looks like there may have been a little confusion here, but it appears that the deal is still working as before.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Clayton, Lawrence
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:53 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	Producers requesting L/Cs

Rod, I am very concerned about the statement that Enron cannot get any added LCs' issued.  This may be a disclosue event for us.  I think we need this retracted and for Enron to affirm there ability to perform under our facility.  Your thoughts?
----- Forwarded by Lawrence Clayton/Houston/Eott on 10/30/2001 01:49 PM -----

	Josie Castrejana 10/30/2001 11:19 AM 	   To: Lawrence Clayton/Houston/Eott@Eott  cc:   Subject: Producers requesting L/Cs

We have the following new requests for L/Cs to cover our lease purchases.  They are requesting L/Cs because of the Enron situation.  I've spoken with some of them and they just won't budge.

1.  Newfield Exploration		$3MM   	to cover Oct & Nov
2.  J. Cleo Thompson		$1.8MM to cover Oct & Nov
3.  Apache Corp.		$700K     to cover Nov
4.  W. C. Miller			$175K     to cover Nov

I've already spoken to Jesse Mata at Enron and she is telling me she cannot get any L/Cs issued - their banks are not allowing it.   I've got a call into Jack Insigna at Standard Chartered to see if they would be willing to EOTT's L/Cs.  He's checking.

We could prepay Apache - they are obviously not a credit risk.  the others i'm not sure about - we're checking their credit.

let me know about how much you're willing to with Enron.  thanks.  jc


How about our resources?   Is there someone working on Entelligence now for
us that could at least temporarily be redirected to work on updating GCP
appropriately?
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 02:44 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           12/11/2000 02:34 PM

To: Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Information in Entelligence vs Global Counterparty

??  Will IT resources make a difference in what we need to deliver and how
quickly we can do it?  Someone must be giving credit the idea that "if only
we had IT resources..." and that those resources are active on Entelligence
but are not helping us on other business basics.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 02:36 PM
---------------------------
From: William S Bradford on 12/11/2000 02:19 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Information in Entelligence vs Global Counterparty

Sally,

I share your pain about increased deal flow.  Have you spoken with Lavo about
getting additional resources or is there a way to better allocate resources?
Is the Entelligence database used by anybody?  Should we not focus those
resources on GCP?

I am getting hammered on the exposure questions.

Please help!!!

Bill

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           12/11/2000 02:05 PM

To: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT
Subject: Re: Information in Entelligence vs Global Counterparty

I certainly agree that updated information from the wider company database
should flow to update GCP.  I assume that you have talked with both Mary
Solmonson and James Scribner about this process to understand the details.
They are the logical experts for that discussion.  Your memo is a little
vague on that, so if you are getting information from someone else and have
not taken the time to talk with the best sources, I would suggest spending
time with James and Mary so that you and they are appropriately informed.

Absolutely there are procedures in place to handle these updates to GCP.  I
believe that these are pretty manual, as there are no systematic feeds from
Entelligence into GCP.  James and Mary (I refer to both because James has
only recently assumed Mary's duties within Global Databases) can best discuss
how this process works.  If you are aware of specific concerns around this, I
know that James and Mary will want to hear that from you.  As is to be
expected for any business that has experienced a 600% increase in the number
of transactions year on year, there are challenges that we face daily in all
of the tasks that we do.  Your input will help James in making sure that
priorities are set and personnel are deployed to tackle the biggest issues
that we have.  I recognize the challenge that Credit must be facing in
aggregating exposures in our market environment today.  With your input, we
will do our very best to be certain that the data surrounding the 5.000+
deals that are done daily is as accurate as possible.

From:  Debbie R Brackett
       12/11/2000 11:42 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Avril Forster/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric
Wetterstroem/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Information in Entelligence vs Global Counterparty

Sally,

I have been made aware of a disconnect between the data held in Global
Counterparty and in Global Companies ( Entelligence). Much effort has been
put forth in  "cleansing" the parent/subsidiary information presented in
Entelligence, yet the same information is not being replicated in GCP except
for on an ad hoc, manual basis.

What is the standard for data population in GCP vs Entelligence? Should
changes and corrections in Entelligence not flow to GCP since our risk and
trading systems are based on the information housed therein? What process and
or systems enhancements are necessary to accomplish this end result?

It appears we have a major GCP cleanup in the works while much of the work
has been already been done for Entelligence. As we struggle to report trading
positions properly,  let's take advantage of our in house knowledge and share
counterparty data validation results in order to minimize research and data
population efforts.

 Your comments and ideas are welcome.

Debbie


586761.01   586762.01  should be Pacificorp.
thanks


I can check on getting an earlier flight, but I have a feeling that's it.  I have a new computer at work and don't have messenger downloaded yet, but if you think you might be at work for a while, I might try and do it.
-Chris
  Susan.M.Scott@enron.com wrote:  It all sounds pretty good, but is there any way to get on an earlier flight
Sunday? Probably not, I know there are only a few flights out a day, but
if I could get into Houston closer to late afternoon on Sunday it would be
a better for me. I'd really like to stay that Saturday night...so if worse
comes to worse, I'll just deal with the jet lag.
Susan
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Charles @ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Scott+20Charles+20+3Ccscott+5Fkorea+40yahoo+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 6:16 PM
To: Scott, Susan M.
Subject: Re: visit
Susan,
If you leave on Tuesday the 14th, you will arrive on the 15th here.
That part is fine. However, if you leave on the following Sunday,
you'll be back into Houston Sunday. Here is the tenative itenerary:
Looks like Continental! leaving Tues Aug 14 going from Intercontinental
to LAX 0940-1105.
Korean Air from LA to Korea at 1230. You would arrive on Wed evening
(the 15th) at 5:05pm.
Leaving Sunday would put you on a flight leaving Korea at 5:30 pm on the
26th and arriving to LA at
1:00 in the afternoon and leaving again on Continental at 3:30 and
arriving in Houston at 9:00pm
Sunday night.
Let me know how that sounds.
-Chris
Susan.M.Scott@enron.com wrote: Sorry I didn't call this weekend, but
I was swamped Saturday and
subsequently exhausted on Sunday. I basically rotated from my bed to the
couch to the pool to the couch and back to bed. Pitiful but much needed.
Anyway, I was just going to tell you to go ahead and buy the ticket for
me.
Departing the 14th and returning the 26th...which I believe puts me into
Seoul Wednesday night and departing on a Sunday. You can either call or
email if you have any questions for me. And, I'll decide where I! 'd like
to
go for the long weekend. I may pick two and just let you two decide the
final destination.
Sue
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any r! eview, use, distribution or
disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be
an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and
enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and
the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by
anyone as th! e basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ << File:
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/?.refer=mailtagline >>

Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messengerhttp://phonecard.yahoo.com/


60 Seconds for God

Take 60 seconds & give this a shot! Let's just see if Satan stops this one.

All you do is -

1) Simply say a small prayer for the person who sent you this, (Father God,
bless this person in whatever it is that You know he or she may be needing
this day!)

2)Then send it on to five other people.

Within hours five people have prayed for you, and you caused a multitude of
people to pray to God for other people. Then sit back and watch the power of
God work in your life for doing the thing that you know He loves.

Please send it back to me, so that I can also pray for you!!!


Jennifer,

Thanks for your note!  As these trip details get more formalized, I'll keep
yopu copied.  For now, know that there are approximately 18 Wharton students
participating in 3  research projects-- Enron proposed topics-- called the
"Tiger Program".  They'll be visiting Enron, arriving Houston Thursday the
18th, Dinner at Churrasco's (their choice) on the 18th, Enron meetings on the
19th.

As the details unfold, I'll keep you and Jeff copied.

Thanks!

--Christie.


you're a doll.  thanks. on this one, feel free to control!  even if Cameron
doesn't go up, prentice and i likely will, which means that we'll be stopping
by napa (if you guys don't mind).


Correct....our intent is to err on the side of conservatism with respect to
pulling credits off the ok list and then put them back on as and when the
legal and commercial due diligence suggests that it is prudent.  It is
definately impractical to ask for specific consent from each reference credit
as we can probably expect many of the consent docs to make it into the bin.
I have drafted an initial notification letter and will forward for review
tomorrow.   I think that it is so unlikely that cp's will sign and mail back
a formal consent that we should consider delisting them instead of asking for
consent.  If we are successful in building the business as a standard for
price discovery and liquidity, companies will ask us to quote on them.

Bradford is taking a final pass through the reference credits and I will
forward the pared down list on asap.

bryan

Louise Kitchen
19/01/2000 20:15
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Simons/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Consent

Probably not my place to comment but I haven't seen anything from Bryan yet.
We need to find a better way around this no-one is ever going to consent if
that is required for specific customers.  But on the major point , having
spoken to Bryan over th elast couple of days, I believe he is not going to
quote on any entity we have a big relationship with initially.  I have seen
the first pass at the list but know that Bryan wasn't happy with it as it
included people like TXU.

On the other point do you actually mean consent or notification - if we send
them a notice, follow up with  a phone call on the big ones then we can make
a business decision about how they feel.  Do they actually need to agree on
paper?

Louise

To: Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Simons/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Consent

Apparently there was some miscommunication.  It was very clear to me after
our meeting in Louise's office that with respect to proposed Reference
Entities with which Enron has an existing business relationship you were
going to add the consent to the notice letter.  It was that consent that was
to dramatically speed up the process of determining which Reference Entities
could be listed.  As we discussed last week, without that consent each
proposed Reference Entity must be evaluated separately regarding whether or
not a confidentiality agreement is in place and whether or not the existing
business relationship is extensive enough to require consent.  Neither of
these evaluations will be easy or quick.  While Enron North America has been
reasonably good about compiling lists of confidentiality agreements, it is by
no means clear that all other Enron entities have done so.  We have not yet
determined a process for evaluating the extent of the existing business
relationships with our customers but that process will necessarily require
significant amounts of legal and commercial time at a high enough level to
make important judgment calls.

My impression was that you were willing to add the consents to the notice
letters since in one fell swoop it resolved a difficult legal issue and moved
your earliest possible launch date forward by weeks if not months but also on
the assumption that if a customer was not willing to give us their consent we
should not be taking the commercial risk that it was precisely those
customers whose relationships would be jeopardized by proceeding to use them
as a Reference Entity.

We will now move forward to develop the processes necessary to conduct the
evaluations mentioned above.  Please send the list of proposed Reference
Entities as soon as possible.

Bryan Seyfried
01/19/2000 06:35 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Consent

Just to clarify, we do not intend to ask for consent from every reference
credit, we do intend to send introductory letters to the relevant parties at
the initial set of reference credits which notifies them of our intentions
and why it is good for them.  My hope is that there are very few reference
credits that we need to get consent from and then we can make the commercial
decision of whether it is better to get consent or not quote on them.

As an initial step, I think we need to understand which reference credits
have confidentiality agreements in place and determine those names that we
have a potential fiduciary responsibility.  The latter obviously will not be
black and white but hopefully we can make some progress.  I would expect that
are really deep relationships are likely to be with either really small
counterparties or a very small subset of our large counterparties.

Hopefully I am restating what everyone already thought but if not apologies
for the miscommunication.

Call me if you want to discuss further.

bs


Note that the No "Out" version requires us to pay the premium on Tuesday!


---------------------- Forwarded by V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2001 05:39 PM ---------------------------

ConsumerCare@autobytel.com on 04/20/2001 07:35:30 AM
To:	v.charles.weldon@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	Your autobytel.com Purchase Request #8334234

TO        : charlie weldon, Houston, TX
E-MAIL    : v.charles.weldon@enron.com
CUSTOMER #: 6048850

Dear charlie,

Autobytel.com Customer Service would like to thank you for selecting our company to assist with your request for a 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe.

Based upon the residence information you provided to us, your request has been assigned to the following Autobytel.com Accredited Dealer in your area:

*** Mac Haik Chevrolet ***  in Houston, TX.

Mac Haik Chevrolet will provide you with a pleasant buying experience and a great value.  The trained Autobytel.com Manager at Mac Haik Chevrolet, that will be contacting you within one (1) business day*, is Barry Cook.

For the names and locations of other Autobytel Accredited Dealers  to service your request, please refer to the dealer listing below. In contacting them, please make sure that you ask specifically for the Autobytel.com Manager whose name and phone number is listed.

To assist you further, we invite you to visit our Finance page and let us help you save even more money on the purchase or  lease of your new or used vehicle.  To receive a free no-obligation quote from multiple lending institutions who are all competing for your business, with one secure and easy application, simply go to http://www.autobytel.com/index.cfm?sction=finance

It is important to us that you have a quality experience.  Please ask for our assistance if you have not heard from the initially assigned dealer within two (2)business days of sending in your purchase request, or if any of your other expectations have not been met.

You may reach your Customer Service Specialist by e-mailing: ConsumerCare@autobytel.com, or by phone at (888) 422-8999.

Sincerely,

Autobytel.com Customer Service

You may also contact any of the following Accredited Autobytel.com Dealers to assist you with your vehicle request:

Covert Country of Taylor: Hutto, TX - Contact Winston "Flash" Gordon at (512) 759-1515
Randall Noe Chevrolet Pontiac Oldsmobile: Kaufman, TX - Contact Faron Young at (972) 932-2195
Covert Chevrolet - Oldsmobile: Bastrop, TX - Contact Bruce Evans at (800) 937-7076
Covert Chevrolet - Oldsmobile: Bastrop, TX - Contact Bruce Evans at (800) 937-7076
Van Chevrolet - Geo: Carrollton, TX - Contact Charles Hoskins at (972) 389-6700
Graff Chevrolet: Grand Prairie, TX - Contact Gerald Hatley at (972) 343-1216
Mac Haik Chevrolet: Houston, TX - Contact Barry Cook at (281) 497-6600
Norman Frede Chevrolet Company: Houston, TX - Contact Justin McGaughey at (281) 486-2200
Robbins Nissan: Humble, TX - Contact Jim Massey at (281) 446-3181
El Dorado Chevrolet: Mc Kinney, TX - Contact Don Kennedy at (972) 569-0101
J K Chevrolet: Nederland, TX - Contact James McNutt at (409) 722-0443 x336
Reliable Chevrolet II, LP: Richardson, TX - Contact Steve Lumbley at (972) 952-1500
Kellogg Chevrolet - Honda: San Benito, TX - Contact Skip Maggard at (956) 399-2491
Champion Chevrolet: Austin, TX - Contact Melissa Hornsby at (512) 345-7890
Musser Motors: Terrell, TX - Contact Roger Cermack at (972) 524-2663
Rudolph Automotive Corporation Inc.: El Paso, TX - Contact Greg Deitch at (915) 534-9995
Coleman Autoplex: Gatesville, TX - Contact Jim Ed Draper at (254) 865-8941

*If you did not submit a purchase request through Autobytel.com, we apologize for sending this e-mail in error.  Please reply to this message and type "REMOVE" in the subject line.  We will remove your e-mail address from our files within five business days, and you will not receive any further correspondence pertaining to this purchase request.


Angela,

Thanks for your message. I shall be glad to attend the conference,
both days. I shall call Dr. Ronn to discuss my participation.

Vince Kaminski

"Angela Dorsey" <Angela.Dorsey@bus.utexas.edu> on 01/16/2001 12:54:15 PM
To: "Vincent Kaminski (E-mail)" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Energy Finance Conference participation -Feb 22-23

Vince:

Further to Dr. Ronn's e-mail dated 1/9, please confirm your
participation
in the UT 2001 Energy Finance Conference to be held on the University of
Texas campus Feb. 22 - 23rd.

Sincerely,
Angela

**************
Angela Dorsey
Assistant Director
Center for Energy Finance Education & Research
The University of Texas at Austin
Department of Finance, CBA 6.222
Austin, TX 78712
angela.dorsey@bus.utexas.edu
**************


When: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US &
Canada).
Where: EB3335

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


Great! I'll call you Thursday morning to firm up a time.

Damon Harvey
Enron Global Markets
713-345-7645

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 9:54 AM
To:	Harvey, Damon
Subject:	RE: Lunch

Damon --

Good idea.  I'm out early next week. How about next Thursday?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harvey, Damon
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:04 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Lunch

Jim,

Hope all is well with you. I was wondering when would be a good time to get on your busy schedule to do lunch. I just wanted to touch base and let you know some of the projects I've been working on since I left your group.

Anytime the rest of this week is good for me and next week (save Monday).

Damon Harvey
Enron Global Markets
713-345-7645


Jeff,

Just a quick note to say "thank you" for your comments at year end.  I
sincerely appreciated your comments and support.
I hope your Holidays were safe, healthy, and happy.  Say when am I going to
see that new home of yours?  You know it is hard to continue to live
vicariously through you if I don't know what to picture!

Sandra


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 12:01 PM
To:	Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Alvarez, Ray; Frank, Robert; Mara, Susan; Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah; Perrino, Dave; Steffes, James D.; Walton, Steve; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Comnes, Alan; Badeer, Robert; Williams III, Bill; Mallory, Chris; Denne, Karen; Belden, Tim; Yoder, Christian; Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	RE: As the CAISO Turns:  CAISO involved in scam with CDWR to purchase excess power from CDWR's long-term contracts

Since Congressman's Ose's been asking FERC alot of questons about what the ISO, DWR, etc. have been up to, perhaps he could write a "Dear FERC" letter saying "here's what I'm hearing, it sounds serious and you need to investigate, pronto, and get back to me ASAP with your conclusions."

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hall, Steve C.
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 1:52 PM
To:	Alvarez, Ray; Dasovich, Jeff; Frank, Robert; Mara, Susan; Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah; Perrino, Dave; Steffes, James D.; Walton, Steve; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Comnes, Alan; Badeer, Robert; Williams III, Bill; Mallory, Chris; Denne, Karen; Belden, Tim; Yoder, Christian; Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	As the CAISO Turns:  CAISO involved in scam with CDWR to purchase excess power from CDWR's long-term contracts

Everyone,

This is hot news showing that the CAISO/CDWR relationship is even more cozy than we thought.  I am not sure how to best use this information, but this scam needs to be brought to the public's and FERC's attention.

1.  According to two sources, the CAISO is helping to bail Gov. Davis out of his high-priced CDWR long-term power contracts by purchasing CDWR's excess energy as an "Out Of Market" purchase---instead of purchasing real-time energy from the CAISO's Supplemental Energy auction as required by the CAISO Tariff.  The costs of purchasing this high-cost power is being charged to Scheduling Coordinators who are largely unaware of the CAISO's surreptitious transactions.

2.  This sweetheart deal violates the CAISO Tariff, which requires the CAISO to buy energy from its Supplemental Energy (Real-Time) auction first.  CAISO Tariff, Dispatch Protocol section 8.6.2 (d).  Only after the CAISO has used up the Supplemental Energy  bids, can the CAISO buy Out Of Market ("OOM") energy.  If the CAISO were following the Tariff, CDWR's excess energy would be treated as an uninstructed deviation and CDWR would be paid the clearing price for Supplemental Energy---which is often as low as $0.00.  Therefore, under the Tariff the CAISO could have paid CDWR the same price paid to other SCs, but instead is buying it at a price agreeable to CDWR.

3.  By ignoring Supplemental Energy bids in favor of CDWR power, the CAISO is able to manipulate the price it pays for energy in the Supplemental Energy market.  Low CAISO demand for Supplemental Energy drives down prices.  The clearing price for Supplemental Energy has often been as low as $0.00.  Therefore, the CAISO gets to keep all excess energy on the grid for free.  If CDWR was not getting preferential treatment, its energy would be treated as excess energy, and it would get little or nothing for it.

4.  While there is no evidence that Gov. Davis has directed the CAISO to buy from CDWR first, this behavior clearly benefits Davis.  Absent the CAISO's purchases of CDWR's excess energy, CDWR would be forced to sell its energy at a huge loss in the open market (just like many other suppliers).  The media has been been making hay out of Davis's strategy of buying high and selling low.  Therefore, Davis and CDWR benefit by being able to offset some of their losses under the long-term contracts.  Of course, they are only able to offset their losses through a back-door deal with the CAISO.

5.  The costs of this expensive CDWR power are being passed through to unwitting Scheduling Coordinators who, frequently seeing 10-minute Ex Post prices of $0.00, expect that the cost of imbalance energy will be close to $0.00.  These SCs are in for a big surprise.  According to one source at Sierra Pacific, the CAISO charged him as much as $400/MWh for imbalance energy.  (Where is the price mitigation here?)

6.  Who benefits under this scam?  Davis and CDWR.  Who loses under this scam?  In-state generators who are currently obligated to sell to the CAISO; Scheduling Coordinators who overgenerate or that have negative imbalances; consumers who end up paying higher prices for energy.

7.  Sources:  Our client representative from the CAISO has confirmed this practice and "the Friday Burrito," an industry insider publication mentioned it also.

8.  Here is the quote from the Friday Burrito:

"There is another problem that is being introduced by the long-term contracts. The ISO is utilizing the DWR contracts as Out of Market (OOM) calls, thereby forcing the contract energy into the grid ahead of the supplemental energy bids in the balancing energy ex post (BEEP) market. As one of our faithful observers told me, "The ISO will be billing some DRW/CERS long-term contracts to SCs as OOM energy. This has been confirmed by the ISO. This means there is no real-time price transparency. We may see an hourly ex-post price of, say, $15, but this will bear no resemblance to the eventual Real-Time settlement price. There is no way to estimate what the OOM charge was as the ISO doesn't post that information. The implication is that parties buying real-time energy will wait 90 days before theyhave any idea of the price. This sort of price uncertainty is completely contrary to the FERC's goals of creating open, transparent markets."
9.  Here is the e-mail from our CAISO representative:

-----Original Message-----
From: Almeida, Keoni [mailto:KAlmeida@caiso.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:04 PM
To: Emmert, Caroline; O'Neil, Murray P.; Gilbert, Scotty
Cc: Sheidun, Donna; Blair, Kit
Subject: RE: "Burrito"

Issue highlighted in blue lettering. This is being researched internally and
an ISO response on how these transactions are being handled should be
forthcoming, I would think.

Keoni Almeida
California Independent System Operator
phone: 916/608-7053
pager:  916/814-7352
alpha page:  9169812000.1151268@pagenet.net
e-mail:  <mailto:kalmeida@caiso.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Emmert, Caroline [mailto:Caroline.Emmert@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:15 PM
To: Keoni Almeida (E-mail)
Cc: Sheidun, Donna; Blair, Kit
Subject: "Burrito"

Can you send me a copy of the 'Burrito' that we were discussing, or at
least outline in an e-mail the name of the person who has written about
CERS and what was published?   What is the official name of this
newsletter?  I have seen them in the past (Harvey Hall used to get it
and sent a couple to me), but I haven't seen it for a long time.

Also, to recap our telephone discussion:  the charges assessed to the
Market in Charge Type 487 are determined by CERS, and are being
collected by the ISO on behalf of CERS, to cover the cost of contracts
that CERS has signed for energy purchases? and 487 pricing/charges have
do direct relationship to the Inc and Dec prices charged or paid to
those who inadvertently over- or under-schedule?  Please clarify that I
have understood this correctly.

Thanks a lot for your assistance.

Caroline

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

10.  Here is an e-mail from the intrepid and vigilant Kit Blair, in Volume Management, who first brought this scam to my attention.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Kit
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:42 PM
To:	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Cc:	DL-Portland Volume Mgmt
Subject:	487 Revelation

Steve,
	Here is a summary of what we have learned regarding how the CAISO is handling 487.  Kent at Sierra Power inquired to me why he was being charged 487, (487 is the charge code the CAISO uses when it has to go out of market, and purchase power that exceeds $150.00/mwh, 481 is the charge code they use to credit it back), for the same hours and intervals that both the INC and DEC prices were zero.  This was obviously very peculiar and nobody in VM knew the answer. So Caroline posed the question to Keoni at the CAISO.  His response was this:  that the CAISO is charging 487 regardless of the INC and DEC prices, to cover the forward market contracts signed by CDWR and CERS.  In effect, they are ignoring their tariff that states they are supposed to purchase power at the lowest price, and are in effect trying to recover costs for CDWR and CERS.

-Kit


AGI Consulting will be conducting the Team Development Training at the Del Lago Resort and Conference Center on Tuesday, April 3rd and Wednesday, April 4th.

As stated in your Training Plan Agenda, the program will commence at 8:00am on Tuesday morning and end at 4:45pm on Wednesday afternoon.  A block of rooms has been reserved for Tuesday night only.  Because this site is located on the north side of town, some of you may have difficulty arriving by 8:00a.  This being the fact, Steve has graciously offered to finance accommodations for a Monday night stay as well.  If you would like for me to reserve an extra night for you,  please call me by Monday, March 26.

Driving directions are noted below:

		Take I-45 North, exit Number 87, towards Conroe (TX-105)
		Turn Slight Left onto TX-105
		(Approximately 60 miles from downtown)

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


_________________________________________________________________

                        F O O L W A T C H
                     Monday, November 6, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184033
_________________________________________________________________

                         Close   Change  %Change

            FOOL 50   1,888.42    +8.78   +0.47%
            DJIA     10,977.21  +159.26   +1.47%
            S&P 500   1,432.19    +5.50   +0.39%
            NASDAQ    3,416.21   -35.37   -1.02%
            (Numbers as of 5:00 p.m. ET)

 SPONSORED BY: ReliaQuote
 FREE life insurance quotes. Compare quotes from top-rated
      companies INSTANTLY! Less than 30 seconds could SAVE you
      hundreds of dollars a year!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=184034

FOOL ON THE HILL: BULL MARKET HISTORY
  What was the greatest bull market in history? Rob Landley
  wonders if it didn't end 2,000 years ago.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184035

TODAY'S TOP NEWS
  Cisco reports earnings, plus stories on AT&T and Transmeta.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184036

RETIREE PORT: DON'T VOTE
  David Braze with an unusual election message: Don't vote. He'll
  do it for you.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184037

RULE MAKER: A SIMPLER WAY TO INVEST
  Who has time to research dozens of companies? Matt Richey has a
  low-stress solution.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184038

RULE BREAKER: AMAZON WANTS TO BE EBAY
  You can buy a new book from Amazon.com. Or an old one. What's
  happened to the brand?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184039

TOP FIVE LIST: DOT-COM-THEMED TOYS WE'D LIKE TO SEE
  Now there's Monoploy.com. Here are our top five suggestions for
  other dot-com-themed toys we'd like to see.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184040

FOOL PLATE SPECIAL: JUPITER MEDIA METRIX TRACKS, FEEDS BACK
  The measurement service says the needs of the digital economy
  play perfectly into what it does best.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184041

HOT TOPICS
  Rambus, Excite, and Apple are hot topics on our discussion
  boards today.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184042

FOOLISH FOUR: BACKTESTING CAN BE FUN
  A Workshop community member introduces a Web-based tool that
  makes backtesting mechanical strategies easy as pie.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184043

FRIBBLE: GOLF AND INVESTING
  A father teaches his son about investing through... golf?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184044

DAILY DOUBLE: BRINKER EATS UP MARKET
  Texas-based Brinker owns, operates, or franchises 1,060
  restaurants. Chili's is just one part of the winning recipe.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184045

BREAKFAST WITH THE FOOL: CONTINENTAL, NORTHWEST DEAL DURING TRIAL
  With their federal court trial at hand, the two major air
  carriers do a deal.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184046

_________________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184047
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184048
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184049
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184050
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184051

 SPONSORED BY: ReliaQuote
 FREE life insurance quotes. Compare quotes from top-rated
      companies INSTANTLY! Less than 30 seconds could SAVE you
      hundreds of dollars a year!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=184052

FREE FOR FOOLS!
 Investor's Business Daily will send you a free copy
 of 24 Essential Lessons for Investment Success when
 you sign up for a free trial subscription of their newspaper.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=184053

INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN STEM CELLS
 Get a free preview of this new report at Soapbox.com.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=184054

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery.
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com

 Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
 e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=184055

_________________________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

MsgId:
msg-23498-2000-11-06_17-42-28-6374899_1_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-18:03:49(11-0
6-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


Attached is the Legal Risk Memo for the proposal currently with RAC concerning the acquisition of a 10% interest in the Ashton Coal Project plus associated coal marketing rights.

Naturally if you have any questions please don't hesitate to contact me.

David Minns
Senior Legal Counsel
Enron Australia
Phone 612 9229 2310


At your request, I have set-up a conference call with
AEC and West Florida Electric for 10:30 am on Monday.
I am not aware of your schedules and I attempted to send
invitations but my computer system seems to have trouble
with that process.  You may or may not have received the notice.

Please confirm that you are available and we probably need
to discuss prior to the conference call.

Thanks
mk


"ML-Steven.I..Fleishman" <ML_Research@ml.com> on 11/30/2000 07:23:50 AM
To: klay@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Utilities: Clash of the Titans - USA

CA power markets controversy becoming increasingly intractable, with FERC,
the state, utilities, generators all weighing in with differing views.  Still
would own 1-2 generators, favoring CPN and NRG.
***************************************************

If you would like to stop or modify the delivery of Research via Email,
please reply to this message or contact Research Publications Hotlines:

The Americas:
     (1) 888 734-1391 or (1) 212 449-9765
Europe, Middle East, Africa:
     (44) 20 7772-2685 or (44) 20 7772-2483
Asia Pacific, Japan:
     (852) 2536-3036
Australasia:
     (61) 3 9659-2379

Publication: 30233508.PDF (4 pages)
Generated by: Research Publications
Recipient: Kenneth Lay

 - 30233508.PDF


Hi George,

I'm looking for the GE acknowledgement letter which we need for this deal.
Can you email it to me?

Thanks,

Kay


John,

I have a report showing that you are still logging into the Telerate application.  As you know, Telerate is going away soon and will
no longer be available.

I also show that you have been migrated to the new Kobra application.  Do you need any help recreating your Telerate pages in Kobra, or
help linking your Excel models into Kobra?

If you need additional assistance, please give me a call.

Thanks,
Sonya
x5-4540

Sonya L. Johnson
Enron Networks
Market Data Analyst/IT
(713) 345-4540
sonya.johnson@enron.com


Tana, hope you're doing well.

We'd wish to replicate the terms in the ENA-Utilicorp. United Inc. ISDA
referred to below in a similar contract between ECTRIC and Utilicorp. United
Inc.   Pls send me a electronic copy of the executed contract.  Tks.

Martin
---------------------- Forwarded by Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT on 2000-10-05 15:13
---------------------------

Yumi Takei
2000-10-05 13:20
To: Rod Nelson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Karin Levin/LON/ECT@ECT, Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT@ECT

Subject: ISDA

Hi!

Thanks for your help.  According to Matt Dawson, it looks like a signed ISDA
has been executed between ENA and Utilicorp United Inc. in the past.  We will
also need an ISDA between ECTRIC and Utilicorp United Inc.  You mentioned
perhaps mirroring the existing ISDA however with the restricted lists I
believe you will be to obtain the copy easier than we will.  However, if you
would like Utilicorp to produce a draft, let  me know and I can request that
from the woman in the e.mail below.

Please advise and I will pass the information on to Utilicorp.

Thank you
Yumi
x34708

---------------------- Forwarded by Yumi Takei/OSL/ECT on 05/10/2000 13:16
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Weber, Angela" <AWeber@utilicorp.com>
03/10/2000 19:33

To: "'yumi.takei@enron.com'" <yumi.takei@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: ISDA

Hi Yumi,

I did confirm with our weather desk that we will be transacting as Utilicorp
United Inc.  Sorry for the confusion!  How do you want to proceed on the
ISDA?

Thanks,

Angela Weber
Aquila Energy
Associate Contract Specialist
1100 Walnut Street, Suite 3100
Kansas City, MO 65106
Phone:  816-527-1293
Fax:  816-527-4293
e-mail:  aweber@utilicorp.com


REMOVE

	asdfga@usa.com
	06/02/2000 04:24 PM

		 To: gunni@easyriders.com
		 cc: (bcc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Can You Still Remember Your DREAMS?

Let's get right to the point.

I am looking for positive motivated people that
want and need to increase their income by 10k per month.

Do you have a burning desire to change the quality
of your existing life?

Would you like to live the life that others only dream about?

If you think this is too good to be true or are skeptical
then this may not be for you... Many have been conditioned
to believe it must be illegal, immoral or unethical to ever
earn any real profits from their efforts.

The fact is we have many people in our enterprise who earn
over 50k per month from the privacy of their own home and
are retiring in 2-3 years obviously wealthy and having total
freedom both personal and financial.

How would you like to:
1. Drastically reduce personal, business and capitol gains taxes?
2. Protect all assets from any form of seizure, liens, or judgments?
3. Create a six figure income every 4 months?
How about:
1. Restoring and preserving complete personal and financial privacy?
2. Create and amass personal wealth, multiply it and protect it?
3. Realize a 3 to 6 times greater returns on your money?
4. Legally make yourself and your assets completely judgment-proof,
seizure-proof, lien-proof, divorce-proof, attorney-proof, IRS-proof,
and become completely insulated?

Are you a BIG thinker, BIG dreamer and a person that believes they
deserve to have the best in life?

Are you capable of recognizing that once in a lifetime opportunity
when it's looking right at you?

Countless others have missed their shot at the title only to look back
years later and wished they should've because they could've.

If you are serious about changing your life...

Call toll free 1-800-287-7755 (24 hr recorded 2 minute message)

HI INTEGRITY!  -  NOT MLM!

Best Regards

---------------------------------------
This message is being sent to you in compliance with the proposed
Federal legislation for commercial e-mail (S.1618 - SECTION 301).
"Pursuant to Section 301, Paragraph (a)(2)(C) of S. 1618, further
transmissions to you by the sender of this e-mail may be stopped
at no cost to you by submitting a request to REMOVE


Louise,

I would like to remind you of my taking vacation from April 23 to May 11. In my absence, Dave Nommensen will be the point of contact for the GTV project.

Regards

Zhiyong


Here are some of the points Cinergy will cover on Monday.  They are coming
down with a team of 4 or 5 people -Mike Cyrus, Bill Greilis, Chuck Winger,
Art Vivar and Brian Stall.
Ben


Hi Liz -

Will you please give your Dad a call at the office at your earliest
convenience.

Rosie


Keith,

It was a great pleasure to work you with on this project.
The entire Enron team was impressed by the quality of the students
and commitment of the School to exploring new and creative
ways of exposing students to business problems.

Vince

Weigelt <Weigelt@wharton.upenn.edu> on 04/10/2001 12:05:25 PM
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Enron project

Vince;

I just wanted to tell you how much I enjoyed working with Enron on the Tiger
Project.  I found the interaction with you and your colleagues very
stimulating.  The ideas we covered (like whether there are network
externalities in these markets) was more like a workshop than a project.  I
wish all businessmen had your interests and capabilities.

Thanks

Keith


See below for prior message regarding same.  Please advise me of the status.
If you want these executed, send them back to me for Murphy's signature and I
will forward to brokers.  Thank you.  Mary Cook

Prior Message:

John,  I will deliver the originals for your signature as vp of ena.  Please
verify the executing brokers' identities, provide me a contact person at each
firm, and return the docs to me at EB3807.  I will have our paralegal forward
them for signatures of the executing brokers.  If you would like to handle in
another manner, just advise.  Thanks.  Mary


Jeff, thanks so much!  Don't know how I missed this email last night.
Really appreciate it, and look forward to receiving the remaining material.
The Governor referenced the nordpool last night in a session, so this will
make our research alot easier, at least on that one!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 6:22 PM
To: kari.dohn@gov.ca.gov
Subject: Follow up materials

Greetings Kari:

Attached is follow-up information from the meeting that the Governor and
you had with Ken Lay and Steve Kean last Thursday.  Tomorrow morning I will
email three additional pieces of information:

Our specific comments on the proposals that the Governor raised at the
meeting.
More details on the "demand buy-down" concept.
Information on Norway's version of the ISO, "Nord Pool."

If there's anything you need, don't hesitate to contact me at 415.782.7822.

Happy New Year.

Best,
Jeff

(See attached file: Follow up to Gov Davis-Ken Lay meeting0102.doc)


*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Daily Riddle ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Today's Riddle is -

#1.  Forward I am heavy, backward I am not.   What am I?

#2.  What occurs once in every minute, twice in every moment, yet never in a
thousand years?

As always, you will find the answer below today's sponsor.

Please take a moment and visit today's sponsor-

=============================================================
J AND M HOUSE OF GIFTS
Over 900 gifts for every occasion.
  Plus Free Horoscopes, Cartoons Newsletters,
  Recipes, Craft Projects, Monthly Drawings,
  Weekly Trivia Contests and more!
  www.jandmhg.com
=============================================================

The answer to today's Riddle is -

#1.  The word ton

#2.  The letter M

=============================================================

---
You are currently subscribed to riddles as: mike.grigsby@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-riddles-8238I@riddlesandmore.net


Per your discussions with Houston and DC government affairs officials, I am
forwarding to you the documents you requested on a legislative term sheet to
use in a discussion with Ken Lay and a supplement outlining other proposals.
These documents were compiled by Steve Burns, Sue Nord, Scott Bolton and Lara
Liebman.  Please let us know if you have any questions.  Thanks.


Anthony

Thanks for the email, however, that was the last thing that I received.  I
think some credit intermediation would be helpful.


Theresa, here is the last info I have from the plant.
-----Original Message-----
From: Glenda Stone  [mailto:glendalstone@earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001  9:22 AM
To: Roger Swenson; Keith Rydalch; Cathy Fonfara; Rick Oakley;  Peter Abt; Dave Ellis; Charles Darling
Subject: Estimated Gas  Needs

 - 12aug-23aug01.xls


The attached file contains updated August FOM volumes for CES.  This file is
an
update to the one sent on 7/24/00.   The changes are listed on the 'Comment'
worksheet.   Please call me if you have questions, problems, etc.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - Aug00_FOM_Req02.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2001 10:05 AM
---------------------------
From: Amanda Huble/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/20/2001 10:03 AM
To: Airam Arteaga/ENRON@enronXgate, Kimberly Bates/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Quezada/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Young/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kimberly Hardy/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jessica Presas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Vuittonet/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: Please forward this to your groups.

PIRA is coming in May to do their semi-annual energy outlook.

Greg Shuttlesworth- North American Natural Gas --- May 14th 3-5 pm (30 C1)
? New Production Outlook
? Price Direction
? Demand Fundamentals

Dr. Gary Ross - World Oil Outlook --- May 16th 7-8:30 am --32C2
? OIl/ Demand/ supply Outlook
? Regional balances
? OPEC Rhetoric

Jen Fraser
34759


Mark, I believe 30 minutes is about right, but you can have more time if you need it.  I assume powerpoint facilities will be available, but by copy of this message to Elizabeth Labanowski, I am requesting her to confirm that my assumption is correct.  Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Mark
Sent:	Thursday, April 26, 2001 5:59 PM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	Re: San Antonio GC Meeting

Jim,

I presume presentations should be around 30 minutes, or do you prefer less?

Should we assume there will be powerpoint facilities?

							Mark


Just wanted to let you know that any Entex information that I have put
together is in the following directory.
 o/logistics/entex...(mostly in the reference tab)

Also, most all of the historical volumes can be found in the risk folder:
 o/erms/1intra/texas/entex/databases

Let me know if you think of anything else that you need.

ac


sorry,,,your names were top on the list....but the computer didn't
"recongize" them????  weird.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 04/26/2000
01:42 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Cynthia Sandherr                           04/26/2000 01:33 PM

To: Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: dwatkis@barcepatt.com, awenner@velaw.com

Subject: draft Gramm-Schumer Electricity bill

Today, by either fax, messenger, or hand-delivery, you will receive the 37
page draft electricity deregulation bill to be introduced next week by
Senators Gramm (R-TX) and Schumer (D-NY).  We have until Friday, April 28th,
3:00p.m. EST to offer our legal technical changes.  If you can return your
comments to me (hand-written comments on the document itself are fine), I
will communicate them directly to the Senators' offices.

WE MUST KEEP THIS DOCUMENT COMPLETELY CONFIDENTIAL FOR OUR INTERNAL USE
ONLY.  WE SHOULD NOT COMMENT TO PRESS OR OTHERS THAT WE KNOW THE DOCUMENT
EXISTS, NOR SHOULD WE DISCUSS THAT WE ASSISTED IN ITS WRITING.  THE POLITICS
REQUIRE THIS COURSE OF ACTION.

Next week, after the bill is introduced, I recommend we make public comment
in support of the legislation as it continues to move the process forward
towards bill enactment this Congress.

The bill contains a date certain of 1/1/2002; stranded cost recovery
language; PURPA 210 repeal, the bundled FERC authority for interstate
transmission and reliability plus the non-discrimination language we
successfully lobbied for and about which Congressman Barton is already aware
of Senator Gramm's support for Enron's position, PUHCA repeal, environmental
conditionality and tax provisions for publics, coop's and nuclear
decommissioning.  Although we successfully drafted and communicated our
transmission language to the Senators, their attorneys have made language
adjustments (pride of authorship) which our attorneys should confirm have not
caused material defect.  If so, we can suggest drafting changes by this
Friday.

All the language you have has been agreed to by both Senators.  The section
missing, the environmental provision, is the last section the two men will
work out this week and will be essential to final bill passage.  Their goal
remains addressing the grandfathered coal facilities and their disagreements
are technical in nature.  Namely:  do you disqualify pre-1971 constructed
coal facilities at a percentage responsible for a percentage of emissions (a
Republican approach) or do you qualify facilities which can operate ( a
regulatory approach favored by the Democrats)?  With the Bush/Gore
Presidential race in full swing, this issue brings ramifications and politics
to bear at the highest level.

As a further update on this issue:  tomorrow the Senate holds a hearing on
this issue with all four of the FERC Commissioners testifying, the
Mid-American group and the DOE Pro-Competition Stakeholder group are meeting
with each other to gain further consensus, plus both are meeting with NARUC's
Chuck Grey and Chris Mele to seek consensus.  I will attend all these
meetings for Enron and report back our continued progress.  Further, we are
scheduling Dr. Tabors and Enron's Bob Schultz for a Congressional Hill
briefing next week to discuss Dr. Tabors' research on the price spike as
proof Congress must make structural changes to the interstate rules plus
demonstrate Enron On-Line's ability to show market price inefficiency.
Finally, we will participate in a "team drafting" exercise with MidAmerican
on their compromise right of first refusal transmission language with Dan
Watkiss as our representative, with others represented by Bill Sherman, Besty
Moler and Randy Davis.  This is an effort to include the Bennett Johnston ACE
group into the MidAmerican fold.  We did get MidAmerican to add the
separation of market and transmission function language in the context of the
RTO language.

Much progress continues even though the House is not in session this week.
The month of May will provide opportunities for Enron to continue
intensifying our legislative efforts.  To date, the strategy we at Enron laid
out months ago is playing out with the two tracks of consensus and
reliability crisis both receiving traction.  We just need the dominoes we
successfully laid out the strategy for months ago to continue falling.

Please feel free to call me should you need additional information or have
any questions.


Hi Judy,

I just wanted to let you know that we have a few contracts that are close to completion.  Aquila has been sent for execution and MainLine should be sent over on Monday for us to execute.  Also, BP Energy, Sequent, and Conoco are closed.  If you need anything else let me know.

Thanks,

Alisha


Gary,

What is the market for IAH Jan-Mar HDD swaps (we are looking to BUY)?  How
does this compare to the 30 yr avg?

Thanks for your help.

Eric
x3-0977


Global Contracts and Global Facilities personnel will be attending an
off-site conference on June 15th and 16th. If you need something while we are
away, please do not hesitate to use the Team pagers listed below or call me
at  (713) 822-7153. We will have a laptop available to setup contracts if
needed.  If you page us we will return your page as quickly as possible.
Thanks


Joe

First of all - blow me.

Second, my wife is expecting in early November so I might be able to slip away in September.  I would vote for anything that would require one flight from Houston.  I'm sure Rich would agree.  ie.  Timmins would be tough.  I would love to join you all and get mocked for an entire weekend.

Lav

or Lavo as the hacks down here call me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Joseph G.Galea" <galea@mcgown.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Joseph+20G+2EGalea+22+20+3Cgalea+40mcgown+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 9:06 AM
To:	Richard.C.Glover@fritolay.com; Lavorato, John; mvanrassel@rpmtec.com; mitchmilestone@home.com; James Galea; james_mcdonnell@matthewscott.com; jonch@magic.pmh.on.ca; Charles Jones; chrismcconvey@on.aibn.com
Subject:	2001 ORANGINA CLASSIC

As anticipated when the constraints of having  the "luck of the draw" taken out of the equation, I have moved into a first  place draw with Headley Jones in our newly formatted hockey pool. I never  once drew first pick in all previous Uncle Buzzy pools (remember him?) , so  this feels particularly sweet. With one game left, all I need is one point  from either Jason Arnott or Beretta Blake to stand alone. My only worry is a  Brodeur shut-out.

I offered Don Headley a split earlier when I was 7  points back, but he chose to poke fun instead. Charles, whose not even in the  pool, cried collusion, to which I explained to him that for this to be the case,  1. Discussions would have had to be held "in camera"  and 2. Others would have to be negatively impacted.  Neither of these criteria were met. I was simply being a good  capitalist.

Regardless, our American friends have yet to pony  in, nor has Galea ll, and I want my clams immediately! McConvey ( in  perhaps the orangiest, sweetest moment of all), please send the $20 owing  to my employer's address below, I do not want you having  access to my home address.

On as totally separate note, I'm beginning to now  look past when my son Yanic arrives and hold true in my very public decree that  having a child will not totally change my life. As such, we should open up  discussions on a second annual road trip, perhaps in late September? I know  Glove is very interested this year, and I'm sure Lav could be pried away from  cooking his companies books for a long week-end. We could always do Tremblant  again, but I'm in Mack's corner (for the first time ever!) in stating that I  could care less if we golf!!! Perhaps we could do Vegas, visit Lav or Glove (  which their respective wives would love) or simply go to my cottage. It doesn't  really matter, as long as we're together for a few laughs!!!!!! Air Canada is  offering $235 flights to Norfolk and Charleston, but that would obviously mean  golf, which increasingly irritates me with all its gimmicky  bullshit!!

So the floor is open for discussion, and knowing us  , I hope you all have enough space in your hard drive for the written  diarrhea that you're about to be assaulted with over the next month, until we  can all agree on something! Are you ready Charles? (" If he's in, I'm OUT!)".  Hey McConvey, are you going live a little outside that Weston comfort zone of  yours and spend a few shillings elsewhere?

Let the witchypooing begin. I'll explain that to  you later Lav.

Joseph Galea
McGown Intermac Inc.
160 Bloor  Street East
Suite # 1124
Toronto, Ontario  M4W 1B9
Ph. #  416-966-1622
Fax. # 416-966-1434


With the change in segmentation rules on Transco, it has become much more
critical to know the primary receipt and delivery points for the capacity we
are buying.  Mr. Goodell said that Tennessee's EBB will indicate if the
points on the capacity you are buying are secondary or primary.  I would
prefer to know the actual primary points on the contract, especially the
delivery points.

I just bought some Z6-Z6 capacity from Penn Fuel for the balance of the
month.  Steve Gillespie verified that Penn Fuel released the primary receipt
and delivery point on the contract.  But, I'm taking Penn Fuel's word for it
and I am unable to verify the information myself.  It could have a big impact
on what we flow in Z6.

Colleen, can we do anything about this through the regulatory process?  Let
me know if you need specific capacity examples.


FYI - information for limit extension approval of board - general context for
previous Continental Power discussions.

Clearly we have 'summarised' issues where possible.

Call if you need any details

Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 25/07/2000 20:39
---------------------------

James New
25/07/2000 19:12
To: Markus Urban/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Gregor Baumerich/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Mead/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Middlo Office slide for Board Presentation - version 2

second iteration with a couple of minor changes !

---------------------- Forwarded by James New/LON/ECT on 25/07/2000 19:12
---------------------------

James New
25/07/2000 19:02
To: Markus Urban/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Gregor Baumerich/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Mead/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Middlo Office slide for Board Presentation

Joe / Markus,

Attached is the Middle Office slide which outlines our planned initiatives to
support the Continental Power business as requested.

Please give me a call if you have any queries.

James


Sorry to take so long--Denise Lagesse of our group has graciously volunteered
to represent us on this effort.  Please call me directly if you need my input
or if I can do anything else to help.  Thanks Denise.  df

Mark Greenberg
03/27/2001 10:00 AM
To: Robert Eickenroht/Enron@EnronXGate, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Koogler/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kelly Higgason/HOU/EES@EES, Jordan
Mintz/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Rob Walls/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: iBuyit Program

To All -

Just a follow-up message to each of you about the iBuyit program.

I am still in need of a designated volunteer from each of your groups to act
as a Change Agent for this program.  Since it is a Corp. initiative and will
be implemented over time, I need to make sure all areas of the Legal Dept.
are on board.

Please provide me with the name of at least one person within your group who
fits the Change Agent bill.  For those that have forgotten, the Change Agent
is defined as follows:

"individuals who are highly respected within their area and known as the 'GO
TO' people among their peers."

Their responsibilities are:

- to disseminate communications regarding the project
- to develop awareness and ownership of the product among their department
- to encourage use of the product
- identify those who will need training
- encourage peer training attendance
- engage in rumor control (basically relay the facts of the program and not
the myths (e.g., the product will replace jobs))

Information needs to be distributed to these individuals as soon as possible
so that they can be prepared for demonstrations of the iBuyit product next
week.

Thanks for your assistance.

If any of you have any questions, please let me know.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


the bucket - that is a great name

BRIAN HOSKINS@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
03/20/2001 04:08 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

This is pretty bad...the KFC bucket?  Ed Glasscock is Mary Jane's father.

http://www.courierjournal.com/localnews/2001/03/20/ke032001s4394.htm

_____________________
Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net


I'm home today (Michael has strep again), but I will check email and you can
call me at home.  This is a good start!  Bear with AR, and call me about
Barbara.  Sheila knows all she needs to know.

ckm

ps YIPPPEEE!!!!