California; Metro Desk
The State Enron Records to Stay Secret Court: A judge orders confidentiality for the power firm's documents. A Senate panel probing electricity price gouging has subpoenaed them.
NANCY VOGEL
TIMES STAFF WRITER

09/07/2001
Los Angeles Times
Home Edition
B-8
Copyright 2001 / The Times Mirror Company

SACRAMENTO -- Enron Corp., the giant Texas-based seller of electric power, won a court ruling Thursday in its quest to guarantee the secrecy of hundreds of thousands of internal business documents sought by state lawmakers.
A Senate committee investigating price gouging in California's wholesale electricity market subpoenaed Enron's documents in April, seeking records of electricity sales, bidding strategies, prices and out-of-state transactions.
The company refused to make the documents available without a court order protecting the confidentiality of the records. Enron sued July 11, and on Thursday Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Charles C. Kobayashi granted the company's request for a protective order.
The judge noted in his order that Enron is a business competitor of the California Department of Water Resources, which began buying electricity on behalf of the state's two largest utilities last January.
"Although the committee argues that the Senate is not in competition with plaintiff," wrote Kobayashi, "the functions of the Senate and the Department of Water Resources are intertwined in so many ways that there is no doubt that not only may there be appearances of conflict, actual conflicts can arise."
Kobayashi's order is a reversal of an earlier, tentative ruling, in which he concluded that imposing a protective order for Enron would be an "unacceptable" intrusion by the courts into the internal operations of the Legislature.
Karen Denne, a spokeswoman for the Houston-based company, described executives as "very pleased" with the court ruling. "Turning over the documents was never the issue," she said, "The issue was always protecting our rights."
Enron officials will work with committee Chairman Sen. Joe Dunn (D-Santa Ana) to craft an agreement that details which documents will be reviewed by the eight lawmakers and their aides, Denne said.
Reliant Energy of Houston, another company that resisted demands for business records, on Wednesday signed a confidentiality agreement with Dunn's committee and will begin bringing 250,000 documents to a depository in Sacramento, said Reliant spokesman Marty Wilson.
Dunn said other companies have begun to deliver documents to Sacramento, but not all are fully complying with subpoenas.
"There are some major holes that have to be plugged by the market participants," he said.
On July 21, the Senate Select Committee to Investigate Price Manipulation of the Wholesale Energy Market voted to recommend that Enron be cited for contempt for not turning over its documents.
The full Senate has yet to vote on that recommendation.
The committee, which the Senate created in March, has focused its investigation on the private companies that purchased power plants after California moved to deregulate its electricity market in 1996.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Sept. 7, 2001
Briefs: City & State
California judge says no to Enron subpoena
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Enron Corp. received a protective order Thursday for documents subpoenaed by a California state Senate committee.
Sacramento Superior Court Judge Charles Kobayashi ruled that Houston-based Enron can prevent the legislative panel from sharing information in the thousands of documents relating to energy trading in California.
"Once the confidential information is disclosed, no amount of sanctions will be able to rectify the damage that might be caused," Kobayashi wrote in his order.
The Senate committee requested documents including e-mails, phone logs, financial records and records of any Enron "trading strategies." The panel is probing whether generators manipulated the power market.

Enron Wins Document Protection Order From Calif Judge
By Jessica Berthold

09/06/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

OF DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- A Sacramento Superior Court judge Thursday ruled that Enron Corp (ENE) must comply with a legislative subpoena of financial documents, but reversed an earlier decision and granted the company a protective order of the documents, according to a copy of the ruling seen by Dow Jones Newswires.
Enron said the ruling was a victory, as the company has always maintained it would be happy to comply with the subpoena by the state Senate committee as long as the company received a protective order.
"We are obviously very happy with the ruling and look forward to working with the committee to come up with a protective order that truly protects our proprietary information," said Enron spokesman Mark Palmer.
The Senate Select Committee To Investigate Market Manipulation has already cited Enron and Reliant Energy, Inc (REI) with contempt for refusing to provide documents, a charge for which the companies could be fined.
Once Enron and the committee draft a protective order and the judge agrees to it, the company will hand over any documents that the committee wants, Palmer said.
However, an attorney for the committee expressed skepticism that the company would actually follow through.
"We have no indication from Enron that they would agree to produce the documents we've requested, even with the confidentiality order," said Larry Drivon, special counsel to the committee.
He added that he could not speculate if the committee would drop its contempt charge if Enron did produce all requested documents.
In his decision granting the protective order, Judge Charles Kobayashi wrote that he was not convinced the committee has solid standards in place to ensure Enron's protection.
"It is clear that there are no standards for determining what are the available protections, no procedure for determining what is a legitimately confidential, privileged, proprietary matter, no procedure for oversight and no prescribed remedy for (Enron) for any unauthorized disclosures," Kobayashi wrote.
Last week, a San Francisco Superior Court judge granted Enron a protective order in a separate investigation by the state attorney general.
-By Jessica Berthold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872; jessica.berthold@dowjones.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

USA: Enron must give documents to Calif. lawmakers-judge.

09/06/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

SAN FRANCISCO, Sept 6 (Reuters) - Enron Corp. must turn over sensitive financial documents to a state Senate committee probing charges of price gouging during the state's energy crisis, a California judge ruled on Thursday.
But Sacramento Superior Court Judge Charles Kobayashi also ruled lawmakers must provide Enron with a confidentiality agreement, saying he was not convinced the committee would respect the firm's right to maintain proprietary secrets.
"If the committee could take the requested action in the name of the public interest, then the committee ostensibly could require newspapers to surrender their confidentiality rights, attorneys to surrender their attorney-client privilege, (and) psychiatrists to surrender their privileges," the judge wrote.
The Senate Select Committee to Investigate Market Manipulation has subpoenaed documents from a number of energy firms to probe accusations California power agencies and utilities were overcharged some $8.9 billion for wholesale electricity during the state's energy crisis which saw power prices in the state soar tenfold.
Independent energy merchants have blamed the price spike on the state's poorly designed electricity deregulation law and a failure to build enough power plants to meet the growing needs of its 34 million residents and its industries.
An Enron spokeswoman said on Thursday the firm has already turned over tens of thousands of documents, but wanted assurances that certain sensitive documents containing proprietary trade secrets, for example, would be protected under a confidentiality agreement.
The firm will now work with the committee to hammer out the specifics of such an agreement, said Enron spokeswoman Karen Denne.
"We are pleased with the judge's order in that he agreed that our constitutional right would be protected," Denne said. "The issue has always been protecting the confidential documents."
The committee has already asked the full Senate to cite Enron as well as Reliant Energy Inc. for contempt for failing to comply with a subpoena seeking confidential documents. It would be the first such citation imposed by the state Senate since 1929, but has not yet come up for a vote.
Atlanta-based Mirant Corp. however, avoided the contempt threat by agreeing with legislators' demands to sign confidentiality agreements, open a document depository close to Sacramento, and begin placing documents there relating to the company's recent business in California.
Sacramento judge says committee must protect Enron documents
By JENNIFER COLEMAN
Associated Press Writer

09/06/2001
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

SACRAMENTO (AP) - Enron Corp. must turn over sensitive financial documents to a state Senate committee investigating possible price manipulation of wholesale energy prices, a judge ruled Thursday, but the state must give the energy company a confidentiality agreement.
Sacramento Superior Court Judge Charles Kobayashi said in his ruling that he wasn't convinced that the Senate committee "will be able to maintain the petitioner's right to confidentiality."
The Select Committee to Investigate Price Manipulation in the Wholesale Energy Market subpoenaed documents from six energy companies as they investigated last year's price spikes in the wholesale electricity market.
If the committee went forward without a confidentiality agreement, Kobayashi said, it could then require the same of newspapers, attorneys or psychiatrists.
Enron's motion to quash the subpoenas were dismissed last week and the judge reaffirmed that ruling Thursday. Another Enron motion seeking an injunction against the committee will be heard Wednesday.
Company spokeswoman Karen Denne called the protective order ruling a victory. "This gives us the confidentiality agreement we've been seeking."
The order's specifics will be worked out with Sen. Joe Dunn, D-Santa Ana, the committee chairman. It will then be signed by a judge, once both sides agree.
Enron officials have offered to turn over 25,000 documents that were already in California, but refused to comply with the rest of the subpoena.
The committee found Enron in contempt for not turning over all the requested documents. A full report on the contempt finding has been sent to the full Senate, which has not voted on it. A contempt report on Reliant Energy has also been sent to the Senate.
A contempt finding against Mirant Corp. was later reversed when the company opened a document depository in Sacramento for the committee's investigators.
If the full Senate imposes sanctions against Reliant or Enron, it will be the first time since 1929, when the Senate voted to jail reluctant witnesses during a committee investigation of price fixing and price gouging involving cement sales to the state.
Enron Wins Document Protection Order From Calif Judge
By Jessica Berthold

09/06/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

OF DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- A Sacramento Superior Court judge Thursday ruled that Enron Corp (ENE) must comply with a legislative subpoena of financial documents, but reversed an earlier decision and granted the company a protective order of the documents, according to a copy of the ruling seen by Dow Jones Newswires.
Enron said the ruling was a victory, as the company has always maintained it would be happy to comply with the subpoena by the state Senate committee as long as the company received a protective order.
"We are obviously very happy with the ruling and look forward to working with the committee to come up with a protective order that truly protects our proprietary information," said Enron spokesman Mark Palmer.
The Senate Select Committee To Investigate Market Manipulation has already cited Enron and Reliant Energy, Inc (REI) with contempt for refusing to provide documents, a charge for which the companies could be fined.
Once Enron and the committee draft a protective order and the judge agrees to it, the company will hand over any documents that the committee wants, Palmer said.
However, an attorney for the committee expressed skepticism that the company would actually follow through.
"We have no indication from Enron that they would agree to produce the documents we've requested, even with the confidentiality order," said Larry Drivon, special counsel to the committee.
He added that he could not speculate if the committee would drop its contempt charge if Enron did produce all requested documents.
In his decision granting the protective order, Judge Charles Kobayashi wrote that he was not convinced the committee has solid standards in place to ensure Enron's protection.
"It is clear that there are no standards for determining what are the available protections, no procedure for determining what is a legitimately confidential, privileged, proprietary matter, no procedure for oversight and no prescribed remedy for (Enron) for any unauthorized disclosures," Kobayashi wrote.
Last week, a San Francisco Superior Court judge granted Enron a protective order in a separate investigation by the state attorney general.
-By Jessica Berthold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872; jessica.berthold@dowjones.com


The Austin Group Energy, L.P. is an executive search firm niched in the recruitment and placement of professionals in the energy industry.
<Embedded Outlook Message Attachment>


When: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:00 PM-2:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB1336

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


Melba,

Here is the sentence that we discussed.  "Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in the General Terms and Conditions, if applicable, this Transaction
is between Counterparty and Enron North America Corp."  Please call me if you
have any questions.

Stacy

	Melba Lozano/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/11/2001 09:56 AM

		 To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Chris Walker/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert B Cass/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin
Meredith/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: EOL GTCs

Stacy,

Attached are the descriptions for the  products affected by the HPL revision
to the GTC.  Please let me know if you need additional information.

Thanks,

Melba
58986

Examples:
Product #1
US Gas Phy Carthage 12Jun01 USD/MM
A US Gas Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which Seller shall
sell and Buyer shall purchase a quantity of natural gas equal to the Daily
Contract Quantity at the Contract Price on a firm basis. The Contract Price
shall be as submitted by Counterparty via the Website. The Period of Delivery
shall be from the Effective Date through the Termination Date.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the
Product description on the Website.
The transaction is for delivery at the tailgate of the Carthage Hub.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency. The unit of measure against which the price is quoted
shall be millions of British thermal units and the quantity shown shall be in
millions of BTUs per day.

Product #2
US Gas Phy ExxonKaty 12Jun01 USD/MM
A US Gas Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which Seller shall
sell and Buyer shall purchase a quantity of natural gas equal to the Daily
Contract Quantity at the Contract Price on a firm basis. The Contract Price
shall be as submitted by Counterparty via the Website. The Period of Delivery
shall be from the Effective Date through the Termination Date.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the
Product description on the Website.
The transaction is for delivery at the tailgate of the Exxon Katy Plant.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency. The unit of measure against which the price is quoted
shall be millions of British thermal units and the quantity shown shall be in
millions of BTUs per day.
Product #3
US Gas Phy       Waha                    12Jun01         USD/MM
A US Gas Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which Seller shall
sell and Buyer shall purchase a quantity of natural gas equal to the Daily
Contract Quantity at the Contract Price on a firm basis. The Contract Price
shall be as submitted by Counterparty via the Website.  The Period of
Delivery shall be from the Effective Date through the Termination Date.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the
Product description on the Website.
The transaction is for the Buyer's receipt of gas at the PG&E Texas Pipeline
Waha header, as scheduled by the Buyer from any one of the following points:
Lone Star (Meter # 504-720); Oasis (Meter # 504-383); Transwestern Pipeline
(Meter # 531-350); Koch Midstream (Meter # 504-259); PGET Accounting (Meter #
504-481).
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be millions of
British thermal units and the quantity shown shall be in millions of BTUs per
day.


A change in the Higgins Brick contact- Ron the owner will be out have J.
call Lori at 3107722813
----- Original Message -----
From: <Kim.Ward@enron.com>
To: <willwestern@email.msn.com>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 8:45 AM
Subject: Re: Customer info

>
> Willis,
>
> I just got off of the phone with my credit guy - He says that most of the
> people on this list are not public companies.  It would be very helpful
and
> will expedite the process if you could get the latest audited financial
> statements, with notes, from each of these companies.  With the PG&E
thing,
> credit is swamped, but, if I had the info in hand, I could push our cause.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kim
>
>
>
>
> "Willis C. Bennett" <willwestern@email.msn.com> on 04/06/2001 02:05:05 PM
>
> To:   <kim.ward@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Customer info
>
>
> Hope this helps
>
>
> (See attached file: enron1.xls)
>
>
>


Pam,

Please, let me know how I can submit the grades.
I gave my students April the 30th as a deadline to submit
their reports and I shall be able to send you the grades by May the 4th.

Is E-mail OK?

Vince

Pamela Vande Krol Castro <castro@rice.edu> on 04/19/2001 10:11:23 AM
To:	(Recipient list suppressed)
cc:	werckle@ruf.rice.edu, spradlin@ruf.rice.edu
Subject:	one last reminder and then I will be quiet

One last reminder ..
Today is really your last day for scheduling final exams with Linda Werckle
(3463).  She will be out of town after today until exams begin.

Also, please remember to turn in your grades for all of your graduating
seniors by Friday, May 4th.  This is the university deadline so we cannot
miss this date.  The registrar needs final information on each student in
order to verify their graduating status.

As always - thank you for your help!

Pamela Castro
MBA Program Associate
Rice University
713-348-6223


can you do lunch on monday?  if not, i will be gone on holiday - paris.  so,  then how about the week of 1/21?

joan


Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886
----- Forwarded by Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001 10:39 AM -----

	"Sandra Gillaspie" <gillassa@fairfield.k12.ia.us>
	04/17/2001 10:17 AM

		 To: <Eric.Gillaspie@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: Re: Hotel Reservations

Eric, Here's Jon's latest email.

Yo Ma:

Yep, I'll fax the hotel today or tomorrow and let them know our lodging
dates. I've already received the lodging dates from the Brouwers and
Rasmussens.

Ai Ping and I are doing fine. The weather in Wuxi the last week has been
heavenly. The wedding planning is going ok. It will all hopefully take shape
in the next month. The post-wedding travel planning will be done during this
period also, we have to wait to purchase plane tickets, etc.

Hope you liked the wedding invitations. The Chinese don't have special
wedding invitations printed for themselves. They just buy them and write out
the details. Fine with me. I didn't include RSVP details because it seemed
pointless: everybody who's planning to come to the wedding already knows
about it. The others don't need to write back and tell me they can't come.

Go ahead and bring Ai Ping's parents a small gift- that would be nice. It
needn't be big, or expensive, just something to let them know you're happy
to meet them.

Glad to hear that Uncle Darrel and Grandpa Jack were able to come over for
Easter dinner. Should I mail them wedding invitations? I don't want to
exclude them from the process just because they can't attend the wedding.

Sounds like the trip to Beijing will be a circus. That's fine: there is
power in numbers. When we're gawked at we can return in unison open-mouthed
expressions of befuddlement. We'll be a parade of big-noses. We should
charge admission.

Hope all is great in FF. Good luck finishing up the grad class. Take care!

Love,

Jon

>From: "Sandra Gillaspie" <gillassa@fairfield.k12.ia.us>
>To: <jongill78@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Hotel Reservations
>Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:40:51 -0500
>
>Jon, I think you and Ai Ping should decide how long the Gillaspie group
>needs to stay at the hotel in Qingdao, and then we'll all do whatever you
>think. (That includes Junks, Gerald, Jean, Staters etc. and your brothers
>et al.)  The Brouwers and Rasmussens need to tell you their time frame.
>Have you emailed them with that request?
>Your dad is in Norfolk, Virginia all this week and gets home Fri. pm and I
>leave at noon on Fri. to finish my  grad class in D.M .  The class is over
>late afternoon  on Sat. and when that's finished I'll feel like I've a bit
>more time. I'm already planning my last quarter so  I'll have my report
>cards done by June 4th since that's the day we head to Minn. and we start
>the big trip on June 5th!
>  I think most wedding invitations have arrived in the States.  They were
>unique to all who received them.  How are you and Ai Ping doing?  I hope
>all this long range planning isn't too huge an undertaking.  Tell me,
>should we bring a gift for the Ai Ping and her  parents?
>
>I had Grpa Jack and Darrell over for Easter dinner and the day went well.
>I was glad both were able to come.
>
>Take Care and Love, MOM

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000 04:21 PM
---------------------------

Brian Hoskins@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
11/06/2000 02:24 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lenine
Jeganathan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fw: Fw: Option 7 <g>

Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net

----- Forwarded by Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications on 11/06/00 02:31 PM
-----

	John House@ECT
	11/01/00 09:58 AM

		 To: John House/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: (bcc: Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications)
		 Subject: Fw: Fw: Option 7 <g>

---------------------- Forwarded by John House/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 09:56 AM
---------------------------

> For a laugh follow these directions
>  >1. Dial Deutsche Bank/National Discount Brokers at 800-888-3999 (toll
>  > > free)
>  > > 2. Listen to all of the options.
>  > > 3. After hearing the 7th option, hit 7.
>  > >
>  > > Every company should have an Option 7.
>


John,

New deal was done on the gas side.  Deal was with Vinatage petroleum in
Bolivia.  Michael Popkin can fill you in with the details.

The attached report is something that is being put together by Scott Mills
group.  It is what I look at to get a snapshot.  Is this what you are looking
for?  Please let me know/provide guidance as to what you want to see.  Do you
want to be copied on this or some variant?

Thanks,

Kish

John J Lavorato
06/28/2000 03:20 PM
To: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:

Joe

A couple of questions.

1.  Where did the Gas Trading P/L derive from this month.

2.  How are you coming on the position reports we discussed.

Talk to you soon.

John Lavorato


I just thought I'd drop a note about the trip.  I think it was the best Enron offsite I have attended.  I thought the focus on interacting was very good and worked better than past golfing events and Vegas trips.  The event was also very well organized and the host/hostess were excellent.

Thank you.

Cheers
Kyle


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 6:21 PM
To:	Sherman, Christina
Cc:	Gruesen, Karen; Whitt, Mark; Harrison, Tyrell
Subject:	FW: Draft Final Closing Statement

Chris,  Attached is Shonnie's draft of the Closing Statement.  Note that she nets out the amount with the payment due under the amended Master Services Agreement.  Please review.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Daniel, Shonnie
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 6:06 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	Draft Final Closing Statement

Shonnie Daniel
Crestone Energy Ventures, L.L.C.
1400 16th Street, Suite 310
Denver, CO 80202
Phone (720) 946-3667
Fax (720) 946-3710
shonnie.daniel@enron.com

PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION: DO NOT read, copy or  disseminate this communication unless you are the intended addressee.  This  communication may contain information that, may be subject to the attorney-client privilege, be attorney work product,or be otherwise privileged, confidential and  exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not  the intended recipient, you are on notice that any unauthorized  disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking of any action in reliance on the  contents of the electronically transmitted materials is prohibited. If you  have received this communication in error, please call us immediately at 866-946-3601and ask to speak to the sender of the  communication.  Also, please notify immediately via e-mail the sender  that you have received the communication in error.


Notice No. 01-91
March 14, 2001

TO:
All New York Mercantile Exchange Members

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:
Exchange Selects GlobalView Software Inc. c for enymexsm Customer Interface
Infrastructure
_________________________________________________________________________

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc., and GlobalView Software Inc., a
provider of software solutions and integrated information for the commodities
markets, announced today that GlobalView Software will develop the
infrastructure for the enymexsm customer interface.

enymexsm is the Exchange,s e-commerce venture that is intended to become the
premier global exchange for trading and clearing a wide range of standardized
physical commodity contracts, with an initial focus in the energy market.

As the key element of their infrastructure solution, GlobalView Software is
providing MarketViewc, their new web-enabled product which provides an
overall framework for market information integration, delivery, and display.
MarketView will host the enymexsm trading and administration functions and
will interface with and complement the Kiodex Trade EngineTM, the trade
matching engine for the system.

The Exchange and GlobalView Software have further agreed to co-market
GlobalView Software,s software tools and data services as enhancements to a
basic set of tools that will be available to enymexsm participants.  These
products will provide extensive analytical functionality as well as access to
a broad array of commodities market information to support enymexsm customers
in their trading decisions.

enymexsm, which will be launched in the second quarter of 2001, will provide
a neutral internet-based trading and clearing platform for energy and metals
products that were previously limited to over-the-counter markets where
participants are exposed to counterparty credit risk.  The Exchange plans to
use its proven clearing infrastructure to introduce complete counterparty
risk management, and create net margining with traditional Exchange futures
markets by calculating a consolidated clearing position.

GlobalView Software Inc., based in Chicago, Illinois, with offices in
Houston, New York, London, and Singapore, is the industry leader in providing
fully integrated real-time and historical commodities market information
using the internet and PC-based systems.    GlobalView Software Inc.,s
products and services focus on helping customers optimize their use of
information by integrating that information into their enterprise-wide
solutions.  In addition to its signature desktop/network product,
GlobalViewc, and its internet-based product, EnergyViewv, GlobalView Software
Inc. offers internet, intranet and portal solutions, data redistribution
services, customized software development, and integration services, as well
as extensive customer support and maintenance programs. For more information,
visit www.gvsi.com.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(01-91)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT on 08/03/2000 03:10
PM ---------------------------

Kathy Reeves
08/03/2000 02:19 PM
To: Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: IM Position reports

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT on 08/03/2000 02:18
PM ---------------------------

BinBin She@ENRON
08/03/2000 03:14 PM
To: Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: IM Position reports

Kathy,

I have not forgot about that.  Currently I am working on another
project(development of a program which will allow automating the process of
copying multiple postids and update the related info (such as dates and
expert clause in port_calc) so that user won't have to do that manually on a
daily basis).

I'll get back to the report issues after I am done with that.

Binbin

Kathy Reeves@ECT
08/03/2000 02:21 PM
To: BinBin She/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: IM Position reports

How is this coming along.  I really need to make progress of getting these
reports into production and I can't do that if I can't test it.
Kathy

BinBin She@ENRON
07/24/2000 01:46 PM
To: Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: IM Position reports

Kathy,

I ran a postid(834931) here and also got blank reports. I am examing this
problem right now. I'll let you know as soon as what's causing this.

binbin

Kathy Reeves@ECT
07/19/2000 03:39 PM
To: BinBin She/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: IM Position reports

BinBin,
I am having trouble running new calc's in the test environment.  I want to
run the implicit position report for our entire book and see how it compares
to our excel models (post id 834931/836743/839620... anyone will to).  The
reports I print in Stage are always blank.  I can run calc's using the
implcit command but I can not print reports on the new postid.

The top page request in an old request but the expicit report request is a
new one.  I need to be able to look at the positions this way as well as the
implicit way.

Kathy

BinBin She@ENRON
07/17/2000 03:58 PM
To: Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeremy Wong/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: IM Position reports

Kathy,

The port_calc  version you have now when run from the port_calc screen in the
egsstage environment doesn't include the changes for the "Implicit reports"
related functionalities. This is because the current setup is for a testing
version which is being used by the Houston currently.

To solve this problem, we have just put a run script :
/home/kreeve/port_calc/run_implcit in your directory: /home/kreeve/port_cal.

For the testing, cd to /home/kreeve/port_cal,  then run the script:
run_implcit  postid (you need to set up a postid for the test run).

To get the reports, you can still use the port_calc screen brought up in the
egsstage environment (you can bring it up by typing: runmt on the command
line)

postid 747584 is still available in the production environment, to run the
test version of port_calc in egsstage, you need to have a data set in the
egsstage database.

By the way, Are the issues you attatched in the reports(explici report and
top page report) new requests ?

binbin

Kathy Reeves@ECT
07/17/2000 03:04 PM
To: BinBin She/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: IM Position reports

Please see the attached issues regarding the reports.

Also, under esggsate I can not seem to bring up only old calc's (including
747584), in order to copy/amend them.  I need to test other types of deals so
I need to be able to bring things up postid's in portcalc.  Any ideas what
might be wrong?  Note that I can print reports from the reportscreen.

Kathy

BinBin She@ENRON
07/17/2000 02:28 PM
To: Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Status of egsstage database

Kathy,

I just checked with our DBA. The egsstage database has been refreshed and is
available now. Please let me know how your test run goes.

regards,

binbin


If you want to speak with Harry, please coordinate through Linda Guinn
853-6104
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 02/12/2000
06:37 AM ---------------------------

Mike J Miller
02/10/2000 11:15 AM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Natole

The employee in question in Bill's e-mail is Harry Moulton.  Harry is an
employee of EECC's construction subsidiary, NEPCO.  Harry was in Korea to
survey the machines at the Kunsan site.  Harry is currently the NEPCO site
manager for the construction of a sixth unit at East Coast Power's Linded
project (Enron owns 25%).  As far as the depositions go, it would certainly
be better if Bob and I could do them back-to back, but that is a lawyer vs
lawyer issue, let us know.


Attached please find the Oct Govt Affairs report.  If you would like to discuss this, please let me know.

Thanks,

Jim


Attached are the revised drafts of the weather GTC's.


Michael Wolff
mwolff@english.umass.edu

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Michael Wolff


The Forum II meeting will take place at 6:00 p.m. on Monday, December 4, at
Vin-De-Garde, located at 3311 Sul Ross (check link below for map).

http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py?BFCat=&Pyt=Tmap&newFL=Use+Address+Below&addr=
3311+Sul+Ross&csz=Houston%2C+TX&country=us&Get%A0Map=Get+Map

Please indicate your attendance below and return to me via e-mail
(sherri.sera@enron.com):

I will attend ___

I will not attend ___

Additionally, a number of requests have been made to change the date of the
March 2001 Forum II meeting (currently scheduled to take place on Monday,
March 19).  Please indicate your availability on the following dates:

Monday, March 12 Yes ___ No ___
Thursday, March 15  Yes ___ No ___
Monday, March 26 Yes ___ No ___
Tuesday, March 27 Yes ___ No ___
Thursday, March 29 Yes ___ No ___


Thanks so much Gerald- looks good.

-Morela

Gerald Nemec@ECT
06/12/2000 11:12 AM
To: Morela Hernandez/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Letter

Morela,  Attached is the letter with some revisions.   Let me know if you
have any questions.


Julie,

No problem. It's your call but Chris should also be mentioned as number one.

Vince

"Julie" <julie@lacima.co.uk> on 08/03/2000 03:06:28 PM
To: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Preface for book

Vince,
Thanks for this.??
?
Are you OK with us using your name for this??
?
Julie
----- Original Message -----
From:  Vince J Kaminski
To: julie@lacima.co.uk
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 2:11  PM
Subject: Re: Preface for book

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J  Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000
08:16
AM  ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
08/02/2000 08:09  AM

To:?? "Julie" <julie@lacima.co.uk> @  ENRON
cc:?? Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant  Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:? Re: Preface for book? (Document  link: Vince J Kaminski)

Julie,

The introduction looks fine. I  have made some cosmetic changes
(typos and split infinitives that slipped  by). You can safely ignore most of
them.
English is not even my second  language.

The corrections are in pink.

Vince
(See attached  file: Intro0802.doc)

"Julie" <julie@lacima.co.uk> on 08/01/2000  07:43:10 AM

To:?? "VinceJKaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:?  Preface for book

Vince,

Hope you are well.

We  spoke a while ago about who should write the preface for the book, and?
you
kindly offered that you would provide this. Is this still?  possible? We
realise that you are extremely busy, so Chris and Les  went? ahead and wrote
something, which is below, and if you want to  review, change or? re-write the
preface, that would be very  appreciated. Let me know? what your thoughts
are.

Thanks,
Julie
(we're getting  close)

Preface

One of our main  objectives in? writing Energy Derivatives: Pricing and Risk
Management  has been to bring? together as many of the various approaches
for  the
pricing and risk management? energy derivatives as possible, to  discuss
in-depth
the models, and to show how? they relate to each  other. In this? way we hope
to
help the reader to analyse the  different models, price a wide? range of
energy
derivatives, or to  build a risk management system which uses a? consistent
modelling  framework. We? believe that for practitioners this last point is
very
important and we continue? to stress in our articles and  presentations the
dangers of having flawed risk? management and giving  arbitrage opportunities
to
your competitors by using? ad-hoc and  inconsistent models for different
instruments and markets (see also OTHERS  WHO PROPOSE CONSISTENT? MODELS?).
However, it is not? our wish to  concentrate on one particular model or
models,
at the exclusion of?  the others because we believe that the choice should
rest
with the  user? (although it will probably be clear from our discussions  the
model(s) we? prefer). We therefore try and give? as clear  account as possible
of the advantage and disadvantages of all the?  models so that the reader can
make an informed choice as to the models  which? best suit their needs.

In order to meet our  objectives the? book is divided into 11 chapters. ? In
chapter 1  we give an overview of the fundamental principals needed to?
model  and
price energy derivatives which will underpin the remainder of the?  book. In
addition to introducing? the techniques that underlie the  Black-Scholes
modelling framework we outline? the numerical techniques  of trinomial trees
and
Monte Carlo simulation for? derivative pricing,  which are used throughout the
book.

In Chapter 2 we discuss  the? analysis of spot energy prices. As? well as
analysing  empirical price movements we propose a number of processes? that
can
be used to model the prices. ? We look at the well-know process of  Geometric
Brownian Motion as well as? mean reversion, stochastic  volatility and jump
processes, discussing each and? showing how they  can be simulated and their
parameters estimated.

Chapter 3,  written by Vince? Kaminski, Grant Masson and Ronnie Chahal of
Enron
Corp., discusses volatility? estimation in energy commodity  markets. ? This
chapter builds on the previous one. It examines in  detail the methods,?
merits
and pitfalls of the volatility estimation  process assuming different? pricing
models introduced in chapter 2.  ? Examples from crude, gas, and electricity
markets are used to  illustrate? the technical and interpretative aspects of
calculating  volatility.

Chapter 4 examines forward curves? in the  energy markets. Although? such
curves
are well understood and  straight-forward in the most financial? markets, the
difficulty of  storage in many energy markets leads to less well? defined
curves.
In  this chapter we? describe forward price bounds for energy prices and  the
building of forward? curves from market instruments. We?  outline the three
main
approaches which have been applied to building  forward? curves in energy
markets; the arbitrage approach, the  econometric approach, and? deriving
analytical values by modelling  underlying stochastic factors.

Chapter 5 presents an overview  of? structures found in the energy derivative
markets and discusses  their uses. Examples of products analysed in this
chapter include a variety  of swaps, caps, floors and collars, as well as
energy
swaptions, compound  options, Asian options, barrier options, lookback
options,
and ladder  options.

Chapter 6 investigates single and? multi-factor  models of the energy spot
price
and the pricing of some standard?  energy derivatives. Closed form? solutions
for forward prices, forward  volatilities, and European option prices? both on
the spot and  forwards are derived and presented for all the models in? this
chapter  including a three factor, stochastic convenience yield and interest
rate  model.

Chapter 7 shows how the prices of? path dependent  and American style options
can
be evaluated for the models in? Chapter  6. Simulation schemes are? developed
for the evaluation of European  style options and applied to a variety? of
path
dependent options. In  order? to price options which incorporate early
exercise
opportunities, a trinomial? tree scheme is developed. This  tree? is built to
be
consistent with the observed forward curve and  can be used to? price exotic
as
well as standard European and American  style options.

Chapter 8 describes a methodology? for  valuing energy options based on
modelling
the whole of the market  observed? forward curve. The approach results? in a
multi-factor  model that is able to realistically capture the evolution of a
wide range  of energy forward curves. ? The user defined volatility structures
can  be of an extremely general? form. Closed-form solutions are?  developed
for
pricing standard European options, and efficient Monte  Carlo? schemes are
presented for pricing exotic options. The chapter  closes with a discussion of
the valuation of American style  options.

Chapter 9 focuses on the risk? management of  energy derivative positions. ?
In
this chapter we discuss the  management of price risk for institutions? that
trade options or other  derivatives and who are then faced with the problem?
of
managing the  risk through time. ? We begin with delta hedging a  portfolio
containing derivatives and look? at extensions to gamma  hedging ?
illustrating
the techniques using both spot and? forward  curve models. The general? model
presented in Chapter 8 is ideally  suited to multi-factor hedging of a?
portfolio
of energy derivatives  and this is also discussed.

Chapter 10 examines the key  risk? management concept of Value at Risk (VaR)
applied to portfolios  containing? energy derivative products. After?
discussing
the  concept of the measure, we look at how the key inputs?  (volatilities,
covariances, correlations, etc) can be estimated. We then  compare the fours
major? methodologies for computing VaR; Delta,  Delta-gamma, historical
simulation and? Monte-Carlo simulation,  applying each to the same portfolio
of
energy? options. In this  chapter we also? look at testing the VaR estimates
for
various  underlying energy market? variables.

Finally, in Chapter  11 we review? modelling approaches to credit risk. ? We
look
in  detail at two quite different approaches, CreditMetrics (J. P. Morgan
(1997))
and? CreditRisk+ (Credit Suisse Financial? Products  (1997)) for which
detailed
information is publicly available. Together  these provide an extensive set?
of
tools with which to measure credit  risk. We present numerical examples of
applying these techniques to energy  derivatives.

Before? we begin we stress that the models and  methods we present in this
book
are tools? which should be used with  the benefit of an understanding of how
both
the ?tool?? and the market  works. The? techniques we describe are certainly
not
?magic wands?  which can be waved at? data and risk management problems to
provide  instant and perfect solutions. To quote from the RiskMetrics
Technical
Document ?? no amount of sophisticated analytics will replace  experience and
professional judgement in managing risk.?. ? However,  the right tools,
correctly
used make the job a lot?  easier!


Thanks for the info. I'll leave in your and Leslie's capable hands.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Steffes, James D.; Lawner, Leslie; Lawner, Leslie
Cc: Lawner, Leslie
Subject: RE: PLEASE RESPOND BY FRIDAY, 10/5 -- El Paso Comments RP00-336

Jim, Jane Tholt is the primary contact for Leslie and me on this filing.  Although I wouldn't have any problem changing the order of the arguments, Jane is pushing the pooling issue very hard and she wants to see it up front.  She has actually tried to make even more arguments on pooling, but Leslie and I have so far convinced her that doing so would not be helpful.  We went over the draft with Barry, Janie and Stephanie last Thursday, and he did not raise any concerns with the order of the arguments.  Leslie -- could you work in an "executive summary" up front with bullet points?

Pooling is actually a very important issue for the day to day business on El Paso, and this is our only opportunity to make these arguments.  It's a major concern because increasing the number of pools was a key component of El Paso's proposal that is the basis for this proceeding, and we don't think FERC staff fully appreciates the consequences of increasing the number of pools.  In addition, a few of the shippers, including SoCal Gas, have indicated that they would like to have a system with receipt point rights all the way back to the wellheads, which the West Desk is totally opposed to, and unfortunately, FERC Staff data request questions seemed to indicate they might be seriously considering it as an option.

Thanks for your input.  So far, I haven't had any comments from anyone else.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Fri 10/5/2001 7:53 AM
To: Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Cc:
Subject: RE: PLEASE RESPOND BY FRIDAY, 10/5 -- El Paso Comments RP00-336

Becky --

My only question is one of emphasis.  Are points 3&4 the key for Barry T.?  If so, should we move them up higher?  Also, why the very lenghthy discussion of pooling points?  The length makes the points after that discussion hard to appreciate.  Maybe a list of bullet points up front?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:   Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:27 PM
To:     Alvarez, Ray; Comnes, Alan; Frank, Robert; Gahn, Scott; Kingerski, Harry; Lawner, Leslie; Perrino, Dave; Sharp, Greg; Shireman, Kristann; Smith, Matt; Steffes, James D.; Stoness, Scott; Thome, Jennifer; Walton, Steve; Allen, Phillip K.; Black, Don; Calcagno, Suzanne; Courtney, Mark; Dasovich, Jeff; Ermis, Frank; Fulton, Donna; Gay, Randall L.; Grigsby, Mike; Hewitt, Jess P.; Holst, Keith; Kaufman, Paul; Kuykendall, Tori; Mara, Susan; McMichael Jr., Ed; Miller, Stephanie; Nicolay, Christi L.; Smith, Matt; Sullivan, Patti; Superty, Robert; Tholt, Jane M.; Tycholiz, Barry

Subject:        PLEASE RESPOND BY FRIDAY, 10/5 -- El Paso Comments RP00-336

Please review the attached filing and provide any comments you may have by COB Friday, 10/5.

The filing is ENA's comments on El Paso's proposal for receipt point allocation, focusing on discussions at the two technical conferences in the proceeding.  Also, it may be that, based on further discussion with certain other shippers, we will modify our statement in Item No. 1 to to support a different version of the method for allocating receipt point rights, but only if there is strong opposition to our method.  We don't want FERC to select the method that El Paso proposed originally.

   << File: RP00-336-002 Conf Comments Drft8.doc >>


Time is critical and your insight is essential for success.  If you haven't
already, please remember to complete the survey below.  The survey responses
are anonymous so everyone is receiving this reminder. Your input will help
shape future Enron information sharing systems. Please complete by noon on
Friday, December 8th.

Thanks again.

Sincerely,
Kent W. Morrison
KM Business Analyst Consultant

---------------------- Forwarded by Kent Morrison/NA/Enron on 12/07/2000
11:47 AM ---------------------------

Kent Morrison
12/06/2000 09:11 AM
To: Bob Sparger/Corp/Enron@Enron, Suzanne Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
Rogers/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jack
White/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Alexander Perwich/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Eric
Benson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Entman/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Dayna F Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Dawson/Govt.
Affairs/LON/ECT@ECT, Doug Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael J Miller/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, David
Gossett/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew
Parsons/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Medcalf/NA/Enron@Enron, Calvin
Eakins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Derryl Cleaveland/NA/Enron@ENRON, David
Johanson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
stephen.simpson@enron.com, norman_levine@enron.net, Rita Hartfield/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, ddelain2@enron.com
cc: Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Knowledge Management Pilot and Prototype Project

Please complete the Knowledge Management survey below.  You are being asked
to participate in this survey because your name was recommended during
one-on-one interviews conducted for the KM Pilot and Prototype project.
Please take a few minutes and complete this survey before noon on Friday,
December 8th.

Thank you in advance for your time and participation.

Sincerely,
Kent W. Morrison
KM Business Analyst Consultant

http://etcsurvey.corp.enron.com/wi/p0231745/i.asp


Kim,

Just blk off from 11:00a.m. til the rest of the day.  Memorial Park Golf Course.  (Florida Scramble)  I forward more details later.
Noon tee-off.

Many Thanks,

Liz


Lance Schuler has a few comments to the draft I circulated last night.  Once I receive those from him, I'll send around a new version.

With regard to David's comments, I agree that we should be as specific as possible.  That said, however, if we aren't certain that all counterparties will agree to those specific terms, then we may not want to make those promises in this document.  Mary Jean -- what do you think?

What did the creditors' committee say about this today?

Michelle

-----Original Message-----
From: Oxley, David
Sent: Mon 12/24/2001 10:46 AM
To: Cash, Michelle; 'mary.jean.potenzone@weil.com'
Cc: 'lance.schuler@enron.com'; Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise
Subject: Re:

The objective seems to have gotten alittle lost here.

We want the terms to be firm and as specific as the version we had on Friday (although I take point about arbitration and vesting of rest stock - although we have to insert something in here). Bear in mind Umbrella had agreed to these terms and Mark M and Lance were to run them passed Top Gun. Presuming they did, seems to me it is reasonable to assume this is what the deal will actualy be (Lance also mentioned creditor committee had seen Umbrella's term sheet last week).

 The covering memo should be explicit in asking the ee to confirm that if a deal was presented in substantially these terms, they would sign them. The wording needs to be tight and regardless of it's enforceability make above clear. In other words let's make it look as binding as we can.

If we really can't do above let's say so and we can look at plan b. John, it may be best we can achieve here is an indicative draft which we talk with top 20 about and tee them up for real thing circa Jan 10. However let's wait and see if we can get one more draft done for Weds.

David
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


I have to agree.  It sounds like a fundamental lack of consideration situation.  If we are the buyer and actually believe there is value here, we should be willing to pay SOME kind of premium, even if it is fairly small.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rossi, Robbi
Sent:	Friday, June 15, 2001 3:59 PM
To:	Taylor, Mark
Subject:	Put option

  Mark,

  I have a trader who is trying to do a stand alone Put option where we are the option buyer.  There is no premium or other consideration.  I have a real problem with the enforceability of this deal.  Any thoughts?


---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99 08:46
AM ---------------------------

"Yaish, Yair (OGC)" <YYaish@exchange.ml.com> on 12/28/99 05:22:00 PM
To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Notices Language

Elizabeth,

The following is the address where copies of notices should be sent to:

    Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
     Office of General Counsel - CICG
Legal
     World Financial Center, North Tower
     250 Vesey Street, 12th Floor
     New York, NY  10281-1312
     Phone: (212) 449-4367
     Fax: (212) 449-5559

Best regards,

Yair Yaish
Merrill Lynch (OGC)
212-449-2456
yyaish@exchange.ml.com


Check with Scott Govenar regarding the advancement of these bills.  thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron on 04/23/2001
03:57 PM ---------------------------

Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com> on 04/23/2001 02:24:38 PM
To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev Hansen
<bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald <Michael.McDonald@enron.com>,
Sandra McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>, "Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>,
Mike D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>, Leslie Lawner <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>,
Robert Frank <rfrank@enron.com>, Ken Smith <ken@kdscommunications.com>, Janel
Guerrero <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>, Jennifer Thome
<Jennifer.Thome@enron.com>, Eric Letke <eletke@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Legislation

Following up on our conference call, attached please find the following
bills:

AB 1085
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_1051-1100/ab_1085_bill_20010404_amended
_asm.pdf

AB 57
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0051-0100/ab_57_bill_20010416_amended_a
sm.pdf

SBX 18
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx1_18_bill_20010125_introdu
ced.pdf


confusion (created by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/9/2000)

  (created by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 2/10/2000)

 Re: OECD Meetings June 26-28, Paris (created by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on
2/9/2000)

 Development Center Class Reminder  - James D Steffes (created by
Ernie/HOU/ECT on 3/1/2000)

 UPDATED Qwest press release (created by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 2/10/2000)

 Re: Draft PGN/Pertamina Singapore Gas Transportation Agreement (created by
Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/10/2000)

 Revised eSpeak Schedule (created by Sarah Palmer/HOU/ECT on 2/11/2000)

 Re: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets (created
by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/9/2000)

 Re: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets (created
by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 2/9/2000)

 DEN Release (created by Beth Meyer/Corp/Enron on 2/10/2000)

 Gov't Affairs Activities (created by Mike Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
2/8/2000)

 Re: Department of Energy Pre-departure Briefing w/ Asst. Secy. Goldwyn
(created by Andrew Makk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 2/9/2000)

 Re: Department of Energy Pre-departure Briefing w/ Asst. Secy. Goldwyn
(created by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/10/2000)

 Re: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets (created
by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/10/2000)

 Re: Department of Energy Pre-departure Briefing w/ Asst. Secy. Goldwyn
(created by Mac McClelland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 2/9/2000)

 Article re Bush/Enron (created by Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES on 2/9/2000)

 Department of State Personnel Joining Enron's Washington Office In June
(created by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 2/11/2000)

 Motley Fool article (created by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 2/10/2000)

 Transredes news articles Feb. 29 (created by Henry Means/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
on 2/29/2000)

 Department of Commerce Missions On Clean Energy-Request For Enron's
Participation (created by Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 2/9/2000)

 Video Screens in EB Elevator Cabs (created by Bill Donovan/EPSC/HOU/ECT on
2/11/2000)

 Re: Video Screens in EB Elevator Cabs (created by David Mims/Enron
Communications on 2/11/2000)

 Department of Energy Pre-departure Briefing w/ Asst. Secy. Goldwyn (created
by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/9/2000)

 Department of Commerce Missions On Clean Energy-Request For Enron's
Participation (created by Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron on 2/9/2000)

 Alliance To Save Energy-A Possible Annual Award? (created by Joe
Hillings/Corp/Enron on 2/9/2000)

 Meetings in Houston, 14-16 Feb. (created by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on
2/9/2000)

 Re: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets (created
by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 2/10/2000)

  (created by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 2/10/2000)

 Transredes news articles Feb. 8 (created by Henry Means/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
2/8/2000)

 Ask Why? Campaign (created by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 2/10/2000)

 Re: Department of Energy Pre-departure Briefing w/ Asst. Secy. Goldwyn
(created by Chris Long/Corp/Enron on 2/9/2000)

 Stamp Tax Dispute (created by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 2/10/2000)

 Transredes news articles Feb. 9 (created by Henry Means/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
2/9/2000)

 Primary Pits Money Against Local Appeal- LA Times 020700 (created by Carolyn
Green/HOU/AZURIX on 2/9/2000)

 Regulatory/Commercial Advice Needed by PGN/Indonesia (created by Mark
Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/9/2000)

 Government Affairs - The Americas March 30 Department Meeting (created by
Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES on 2/25/2000)

  (created by Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 2/9/2000)

 Re: New Position (created by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 1/28/2000)

 MAJOR ACTIVITIES AS OF 1/14/00 (created by Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
on 1/29/2000)

 Vacation (created by Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES on 2/9/2000)

 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING - MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25 (created by Sherri
Sera/Corp/Enron on 9/21/2000)

 Message not deliverable (created by Administrator@wyden.senate.gov
(Administrator) on 2/26/2001)

 Re: Department of Energy Pre-departure Briefing w/ Asst. Secy. Goldwyn
(created by Andrew Makk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 2/9/2000)

 Re: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING - MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25 (created by Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron on 9/21/2000)

 Re: Department of Energy Pre-departure Briefing w/ Asst. Secy. Goldwyn
(created by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 2/10/2000)


What's up?  Did Rick fire you?  Or does he work for you now?  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 10/12/2000
03:17 PM ---------------------------

Shelley Corman
10/12/2000 01:13 PM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Danny
McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, John
Shafer/OTS/Enron@Enron, David L Johnson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Phil
Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Nancy Bagot/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Janet
Butler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Government Affairs Organizational Changes

FYI:  Attached is a memo from Rick Shapiro outlining organizational changes
in the Government Affairs group, most significantly the appointment of a new
head of the Washington office.

This is a great time to be at Enron. The challenges and opportunities at
Enron seem to be expanding with every passing day.  This presents enormous
challenges for Government Affairs as a group and for each of us
individually.  As we discussed at the staff meeting last month, this requires
us to constantly reevaluate our priorities, our methods of getting things
done, and whether our organization is properly structured to meet the needs
of the entire company.  While we have done an outstanding job as a group
within our current structure, changes are necessary at this time.

The primary change in the organizational structure is to complete the
assignments for and reinforce the leadership roles of the individuals within
the group who have primary responsibility for setting the Government Affairs
strategy and agenda for the respective Enron operating companies.  The below
mentioned individuals will have the following responsibilities:

1. Enron North America and Enron Industrial Markets:  Jim Steffes
2. The Enron Energy Services Group of Companies:  Harry Kingerski
3. Enron Broadband Services:  Sue Nord
4. Enron Global Markets and Enron Networks:  Lisa Yoho
5. Enron South America:  Jose Bestard
6. Federal Government Affairs:  Linda Robertson

With the impending retirement on March 31, 2001 of Joe Hillings, I am pleased
to announce that Linda Robertson will be joining the office on November 6,
2000, as a Vice President who will immediately assume responsibility for
leading the Federal Government Affairs group in our Washington office.  Linda
was a Congressional staffer and partner/principal in two Washington law firms
prior to spending the last eight years with the U.S. Department of Treasury,
the last five as Assistant Secretary for Legislative Affairs and Public
Liaison, for Secretaries Rubin & Summers.  Linda brings a terrific
background, both in energy and financial services, and is a welcome addition
to our team.  In order to more effectively integrate the Government Affairs
groups and strategy in Washington, the Federal Regulatory Affairs group under
Joe Hartsoe,s direction will also report to Linda.  Joe Hartsoe will also
retain primary responsibility for NERC activities, although Charles Yeung and
Dick Ingersoll will have a dotted line reporting relationship to Jim Steffes
in his capacity of directing our activities for ENA.  Ray Alvarez will be
transferring from his current role with Transredes in Bolivia during the 1st
quarter of 2001 and will join the Federal Regulatory Affairs group, reporting
to Joe Hartsoe.

On a personal note, I would like to acknowledge the significant contributions
that Joe Hillings has made to this company in his eighteen years of service.
Joe,s work ethic, intellect, and integrity have established Enron as a
company that is respected throughout Washington.  I will have more to say
about this as Joe,s retirement draws closer, but I look to him to be a vital
part of the leadership transition in our Washington office that will occur
over the next days and weeks.

I will be relying heavily on the above-identified six individuals to ensure
that Government Affairs is firmly embedded within each of our operating
companies; that we as a group thoroughly understand their current business
strategies as well as new directions they may be taking in the future; and,
most importantly, to thoroughly understand how our organization can
contribute and add value to each of these companies on a continuing basis.
Communicating that understanding on a regular basis to the rest of the
Government Affairs organization and developing a Government Affairs wide
execution strategy will be a key objective for each of these individuals.

In order to ensure the success of these individuals and the Government
Affairs organization; the following changes are being made.

In addition to his leadership role with Government Affairs on behalf of the
EES group of companies, Harry Kingerski will continue to head up the
rates/regulatory group, now renamed Government Affairs Support Services.
This group will continue to provide valuable technical support services
throughout Government Affairs and will be expanding its scope of expertise
over the next months to some of the new markets that the company has and will
soon be entering.  Nancy Hetrick and Vinio Floris will join this organization
and report to Harry.
Jeff Brown, Tom Delaney, Mary Hain, Ron McNamara, Christi Nicolay, Thane
Twiggs, and Steve Walton will now report to Jim Steffes in his role
supporting Enron North America and Enron Industrial Markets. Alberto Levy
will be relocating from our Caracas, Venezuela office and will also report to
Jim.  A couple of special mentions:  Jeff Brown has done an outstanding job
in leading the CUBR (Coalition for Uniform Business Rules) process over the
last year and his current leadership of the Midwest ISO and Alliance RTO
efforts for Enron will be critical to the development of well functioning
wholesale electric markets in the U.S.  It is also my hope that Steve Walton
will play an increased leadership role across North America on wholesale
electric market issues.  The incredible knowledge that Steve Walton possesses
of the electric industry, coupled with his industry-wide credibility, will
provide much needed support to our wholesale electric market reform efforts
across North America.
Tom Hoatson will now report to Steve Montovano in his new role in supporting
the company,s efforts at PJM.  Tom will also continue to be an
organization-wide resource on technical issues regarding generation
interconnection and distributed generation.  Kathleen Sullivan has recently
joined Steve,s group from Azurix and will be primarily assisting Howard
Fromer in New York.
Sue Nord will head up the group that supports EBS.  Scott Bolton and Donald
Lassere, while reporting to Sue, will continue to provide leadership on
telecommunications issues.  Scott and Donald have done outstanding work and
will continue to be integral to our efforts in this area.
Finally, the Resource Commitment Review (RCR) process, beginning 1/1/01, will
be extended to all of Government Affairs in North America, including Federal
Government Affairs and Mexico.  The RCR Committee, beginning immediately,
will be expanded and will consist of Harry Kingerski, Sue Nord,  Linda
Roberston, Jim Steffes, Lisa Yoho & myself.

Please feel free to call me if you have any questions.

Thank you


thank you

   Kate Symes                04/03/2001 02:42 PM

To: Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: DEAL 567990.01

Bill Williams just talked to Jake, the Sempra trader who did the trade, who
recognized the deal and said he'd speak with Harry and clear it up. In the
meantime, this is a good trade.

Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   04/03/2001 10:47 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: DEAL 567990.01

Kate,
Deal 567990.01, trader at Sempra, does not show this trade.   Harry from the
backoffice called.
Please ask Leaf.

Thanks
Stephanie


Thought this might be of interest to you.  Ray

---------------------- Forwarded by Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron on 07/26/2001 02:43
PM ---------------------------

Nancy Bagot
07/26/2001 09:51 AM
To: Julie.Armstrong@ENRON.com, Nancy.Bagot@ENRON.com,
Martha.Benner@ENRON.com, Lynn.Blair@ENRON.com, Sharon.Brown@ENRON.com,
Janet.Butler@ENRON.com, Deb.Cappiello@ENRON.com, Alma.Carrillo@ENRON.com,
Janet.Cones@ENRON.com, Bill.Cordes@ENRON.com, Shelley.Corman@ENRON.com,
Rick.Dietz@ENRON.com, Dari.Dornan@ENRON.com, John.Dushinske@ENRON.com,
Drew.Fossum@ENRON.com, Ava.Garcia@ENRON.com, John.Goodpasture@ENRON.com,
Steven.Harris@ENRON.com, Joe.Hartsoe@ENRON.com, Glen.Hass@ENRON.com,
Rod.Hayslett@ENRON.com, Bambi.Heckerman@ENRON.com, Theresa.Hess@ENRON.com,
Staci.Holtzman@ENRON.com, Stanley.Horton@ENRON.com, Steve.Hotte@ENRON.com,
Rita.Houser@ENRON.com, Steven.January@ENRON.com, Steven.J.Kean@ENRON.com,
Robert.Kilmer@ENRON.com, Frazier.King@ENRON.com, Steve.Kirk@ENRON.com,
Tim.Kissner@ENRON.com, Laura.Lantefield@ENRON.com, Terry.Lehn@ENRON.com,
Teb.Lokey@ENRON.com, Danny.McCarty@ENRON.com, Dorothy.McCoppin@ENRON.com,
Mike.McGowan@ENRON.com, Kent.Miller@ENRON.com, MKMiller@ENRON.com,
michael.p.moran@enron.com, Sheila.Nacey@ENRON.com, Ray.Neppl@ENRON.com,
Dave.Neubauer@ENRON.com, Zelda.Paschal@ENRON.com, Maria.Pavlou@ENRON.com,
Keith.Petersen@ENRON.com, Janet.Place@ENRON.com, Tony.Pryor@ENRON.com,
Lisa.Sawyer@ENRON.com, Donna.Scott@ENRON.com, Emily.Sellers@ENRON.com,
Sharon.Solon@ENRON.com, Cindy.Stark@ENRON.com, James.Studebaker@ENRON.com,
Gina.Taylor@ENRON.com, Stephen.Veatch@ENRON.com, Iris.Waser@ENRON.com,
Ricki.Winters@ENRON.com, rebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com, Eva
Neufeld/Enron@EnronXGate, Ruth Mann/Enron@EnronXGate, Gregory J.
Porter/ENRON@enronXgate, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karina
Prizont/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: FERC Order on Reporting CA gas sales

Attached is the Commission's "Order Imposing Reporting Requirement on Natural
Gas Sales to California Market," which was issued late yesterday.

In the order, the Commission finds that if does have the authority to request
the information as set out in the May 18 order proposing the requirements.

The information is to cover August 1, 2001 through Sept. 30, 2002 (the end
date coincides with the end of the Commission's mitigation plan re: wholesal
prices in California and the West).
Specific info gas sellers and LDCs file concernign purchase and sales
transactions is exempt from FOIA disclosure
Also, respondents may request privileged treatment of "other portions of
their responses subject to the.....Commission's regulations"
Some of the questions have been modified based on comments received based on
comments received on the May 18th proposal
Transaction by transaction data is required; FERC will aggregate the
information
The information request will NOT be expanded beyond California
FERC is providing the reporting format as a data template to be available on
RIMS.

The order is attached here, and the appendix listing specific questions is
below.

==========================================================================

APPENDIX

Answers to all questions below that require a statement of volumes should set
forth the requested volumes on an MMBtu basis.

For Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines:

1. On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please
provide the following information for each contract for transportation to the
California border:

a. the transaction or contract identification number;
b. the terms and effective date of the contract;
c. contract demand by shipper;
d. the daily scheduled volume by shipper;
e. the daily nominated volume by shipper;
f. the daily delivered volume by shipper;
g. whether the service is firm or interruptible;
h. the rate charged in $$/MMbtu;
i. primary receipt and delivery points associated with the contract; and,
j. whether the shipper is affiliated with the pipeline.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the
response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version
97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

2. For the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please provide the
following information for each capacity release transaction for
transportation to the California border:

a. the transaction or contract identification number, or offer number;
(This number should tie to contract number reported in Question 1,a., above)
b. the name of the releasing shipper;
c. the name of the acquiring shipper;
d. the contract quantity;
e. the acquiring shipper's contract rate; and,
f. the releasing shipper's contract rate.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the
response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version
97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.
Docket No. RM01-9-000 - 6 -

3. On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please
provide the following system information:

a. the maximum peak day design capacity;
b  the daily maximum flowing capacity;
c  the daily scheduled system volume;
d. the daily delivered system volume;
e. the daily scheduled volume at each California delivery point;
f. an explanation of each instance that the daily maximum flowing capacity is
below the maximum peak day design capacity; and,
g. an explanation of any daily variance in the maximum flowing capacity.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the
response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version
97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

4. On a daily basis for May 1999 and May 2000, please provide the following
system information:

a. the maximum peak day design capacity;
b  the daily maximum flowing capacity;
c  the daily scheduled system volume;
d. the daily delivered system volume, and,
e. the daily scheduled volume at each California delivery point.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the
response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version
97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

For Sellers of Natural Gas to the California Market:

1. State whether the seller is affiliated with an interstate or intrastate
natural gas pipeline company or local distribution company, and, if so, give
the name and address the affiliated company.

2.  On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002,
please provide the following information for each contract in which you sold
natural gas and the gas is physically delivered at points on the California
border or in California:
a. the sales contract's identification number;
b. the term of the sales contract (beginning and ending dates);
c. the name of the buyer identifying whether the buyer is an energy marketer,
local distribution company, or end user;
d. the volumes sold (on a MMBtu basis);
e. the price paid by buyer, and
f. whether the price is fixed or indexed (identify the index).

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the
response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version
97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

3. For each sales contract, identify separately the transportation component
and the gas commodity component of the price.  If the sales contract
specifies the transportation component of the price, the seller shall report
that amount.  If the sales contract only includes an overall price, then the
seller shall report the transportation cost it incurred in moving the gas
from the point where it purchased the gas to the point where it sold the gas
and how it determined that amount.  If the sale was made at the same point
where the gas was purchased, and there is no transportation element in the
sale, the seller shall respond "n.a."

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the
response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version
97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

4. For the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please provide the
following information on a daily basis for each of your gas purchase
contracts associated with the sales contracts you identified in response to
Question 2:

a. the purchase contract's identification number;
b. the pipeline upstream of the point of delivery; and the pipeline
downstream of the point of delivery;
c. the term of the purchase contract (beginning and ending dates);
d. the daily volumes (on a MMBtu basis) purchased;
e. the price paid;
           f.         whether the price is fixed or indexed (identify the
index),
g . identify the entity from whom the responder purchased the gas; and,
h. identify the point where responder took title to the gas.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the
response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version
97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

For Local Distribution Companies In California:

1. Provide your system's gas sales and transportation requirements, (i.e,
contract demands and daily demands) by core, non-core, electric generation,
and non-utility loads.  Provide a break down of these demands by type of
service (e.g., sales and transportation) and quality of
service(firm/interruptible).

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the
response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version
97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

2. On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please
provide the following information for each contract the local distribution
company has with a transportation customer:

a. contract demand by shipper;
b. the daily scheduled volume by shipper;
c. the daily delivered volume by shipper;
d. whether the service is firm or interruptible;
e. the rate charged; and,
f. receipt and delivery points associated with the contract.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the
response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version
97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

3. On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please
provide the following information for each contract the local distribution
company has with a sales customer:

a. the contract demand by purchaser;
b. the term of the sales contract (beginning and ending dates);
c. the volumes (on a MMBtu basis) sold; and,
d. the price paid by purchaser.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the
response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version
97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

4. On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please
provide the following information for each gas purchase contract:

a. the purchase contract's identification number;
b. the term of the purchase contract (beginning and ending dates);
c. the volumes (on a MMBtu basis) bought;
d. the price paid;
e. whether the price is fixed or indexed (identify the index); and,
f. identify the point where (name of local distribution company) took title
to the gas.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the
response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version
97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

5. On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please
provide by interstate pipeline the type and quantity of transportation
service your system has under contract.  At each receipt point, provide
maximum peak day design capacity, the daily maximum flowing capacity, the
daily nominated capacity and the daily scheduled volumes of the local
distribution system.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the
response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version
97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

6. On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please
provide on a system-wide basis your storage service rights i.e., capacity and
deliverability rights.  Additionally, provide daily storage balances,
injections and withdrawls.

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the
response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version
97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

7. On a daily basis for the period August 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002, please
provide how much of your system's gas supply was from intrastate production
sources.  Separately identify the sources, volumes, receipt points, and
prices.  Include the total system supply in your response.
Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the
response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version
97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.

8. Provide a summary of your system's gas purchases in the following
categories:

a. daily spot purchases;
b. monthly;
c. short-term (more than 1 month and less than 1 year);
d. medium-term (1-3 years); and,
e. long-term ( more than 3 years).

by month for each of the last three years in the following format:

a. price;
b. volume; and,
c. identify, by name, where these purchases were made (producing basin or at
the California border).

Along with the hard copy response, please provide a CD-ROM containing the
response to this question.  Please provide this information in Excel version
97 or 2000 or comma separated value (CSV) format.


Here is the confirm with my revisions:


Hey Rhonda,

My understanding is that this record is still on "hold" pending Legal advise.
(Tana Jones)

Please advise.

Samuel

Rhonda L Denton
04/25/2001 11:33 AM
To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc.

Please unlink this CP from Enpower at the end of the day today.  all deals
have been moved to the authorized agent record.  Please let me know when
complete so that I can refresh.


Please find attached confirmation for Astra.


Hi Mark,

I would like to creat a product for Enron Online for trades on Alliance
Pipeline.  As you probably know, Alliance is a new pipeline scheduled to
start commercial service effective November 13, 2000.  As with any new
pipeline, this date may or may not be pushed back to a later date.   I would
like to create a product that has a description that addresses the
uncertainty of the start-up date of Alliance Pipeline and simply states that
gas will commence flowing when the pipeline goes commecial.

Please let me know if you have language that addresses this situation.

I would like to get this product set up as soon as possible.

Thank you


Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2001
08:52 AM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@Btu.net> on 04/12/2001 04:50:25 PM
To: "Btu's Weekly Power Report" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu's Weekly Power Report

Attached is the latest issue of Btu's Weekly Power Report

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wp041601.pdf


Brian,

Talk  to Marge Nadasky. She
can get a discount of 15% for an Enron employee.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Merrill, Brian
Sent:	Thursday, August 16, 2001 2:19 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J; Stinson Gibner/Enron@EnronXGate; Krishnarao, Pinnamaneni
Subject:	Managing Energy Price Risk book

I am a new analyst here at Enron. I am trying to gain a thorough understanding of our business and found  the book Managing Price Risk 2nd Edition. I would like to know if Enron can help me purchase this book or had an extra copy. Thanks for your help.

Brian Merrill


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000
03:02 PM ---------------------------

"Julie Haviland" <julie.haviland@PaineWebber.COM> on 07/05/2000 01:33:55 PM
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Corp and Muni bonds

Here's what I found.  Pls let me know if I can help you with anything.  I
checked on the bonds that we spoke with you about earlier.  The call date was
in August so I just passed on it.  These look pretty good.

Thanks, Julie
 - kaminsky2.doc


Just tell me the end is in sight.


Dear Susan,

Ready to start your Halloween celebrating early? Scare up a good time with information about haunted houses, costume shops and the party scene. At citysearch.com, getting the details is no big trick.

HALLOWEEN--Be afraid, be very afraid ... of not planning to make the most of the holiday.
http://email.citysearch.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eLrG0CnuzR0EQK0If70Af

METAL WORK--Alternately creepy and crashing, Tool gets the job done.
http://email.citysearch.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eLrG0CnuzR0EQK0Nde0AU

TANNHAUSER--HGO's version of Wagner's warhorse opera has an intriguing new rider--German filmmaker Werner Herzog.
http://email.citysearch.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eLrG0CnuzR0EQK0NdV0AF

AMPED UP--Mike Watt proves you can teach an old punk new tricks.
http://email.citysearch.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eLrG0CnuzR0EQK0Ndh0AX

FALL BACK AND BOOGIE--Thanks to the Daylight Savings switch, party an extra hour at the best dance clubs in town.
http://email.citysearch.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eLrG0CnuzR0EQK0OpM0AJ

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KING OF POP--See Michael Jackson for free.
http://email.citysearch.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eLrG0CnuzR0EQK0OMI0Ae

=========================/adv/===============================
FIND SUPERMARKET SAVINGS--Select a supermarket near you for valuable coupons.
http://email.citysearch.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eLrG0CnuzR0EQK0L7P0AM

CRASH CONSCIOUS--Stay safe with these defensive driving tips.
http://email.citysearch.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eLrG0CnuzR0EQK0Nd50Ag
=============================================================
Visit http://email.citysearch.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=eLrG0CnuzR0EQK0HJT0Af to tell us which weekly newsletters you want from citysearch.com.  On that page you can unsubscribe from this newsletter and subscribe to others.


The SAP printer servers are up and operational at this time.  If you enconter
additional problems with printing from SAP, please contact the ISC Hotline at
713-345-4727.  Thank you.


thanks.
PL


A conference call with Steffes, Kingerski, Boston, Roan, Lewis and me took
place to discuss Enron's position on Com Ed.

Summary - We discussed a  public position of "No PPO without an RTO"  since
without a functioning market, Enron is at risk with our current book of
business.  From a public policy standpoint, we would argue that without the
protection of the PPO, customers need a functioning market in which to
procure power.

Privately, in exchange for supporting the Com Ed Proposal, we would negotiate
for the following (in order of importance):
1. No losses on our existing book of business by negotiating a bulk power
deal to cover our exposure.
2.  Build a broad market by seeking changes to Com Ed FERC tariffs as it
regards balancing and penalties, etc.

As a separate matter or in conjunction with the above, do a default service
or some other related deal.  A meeting is scheduled for Friday with Chuck
Decker to talk through the issues related to physical delivery into Com Ed.

A more detailed memo will follow this weekend.

Janine

	James D Steffes
	04/30/2001 11:59 AM

		 To: Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jeff Ader/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES@EES, Edward D
Baughman/Enron@EnronXGate, Marc Ulrich/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/HOU/EES@EES, Mike
Roan/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES,
James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Re: Com Ed

Janine --

The point about load balancing and following is critical.  EES is struggling
to compete with a physical product in ILL.

I know that Don Black and Jay Lewis are trying to figure out what are the
critical components of the real-time balancing rules.

Maybe we should try and set up a phone call between Govt Affairs and EES Risk
Mgmt to define the necessary rules and see how (a) a ComEd / ICC Settlement
would work and (b) what are the implications of the Order 2000 RTO process in
the Midwest (MISO and ARTO).

Thanks,

Jim

Janine Migden

04/30/2001 10:09 AM

To: Jeff Ader/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES@EES, Edward D
Baughman/Enron@EnronXGate, Marc Ulrich/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Roy
Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/HOU/EES@EES,
Mike Roan/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Com Ed

Last week, Sue and I, along with Phil O'Connor of New Energy met with Frank
Clark ( Senior V.P. Exelon - Government Affairs, etc) and Arlene Juracek
(V.P. Rates and Tariffs).  Sue and I also met with Commissioners Hurley and
Harvill.

Information Gleaned From the Meeting:

1.  Com Ed does not think price volatility will be acceptable to the
residential customers and wants to create a structured rate.  They are not
open to any alternative that causes them to lose money.
2.  They will file a rate case in 2004 to be effective in 2005.  They are not
sure the statute requires them to file an MVI plus 10% at the end of the PPO
period and need to study the statutory requirements.  Their preference is to
initiate performanced based ratemaking instead for bundled rates.
3.  Com Ed's view is that the energy situation is a  national problem.  Com
Ed wants to be protected through its commodity price.
4.  Com Ed does not want the obligation to serve industrial customers and on
a longer term basis, would like to shed its obligation to serve residential.
5.  Com Ed has arbitrarily defined mass market as 400kw or less and has
therefore lumped these commercial customers in with their residential,
however, they are open to separating them out.
6.  Com Ed does not want the legislation reopened which may provide us with
some leverage.

At the conclusion of the meeting it was decided to start an open forum
process to get ideas on the table.  Com Ed is shying away from any formal
process.  Their concern seems to be that they do not want to take the
political heat for high prices and volatility and would rather give up its
default customer service obligations.

Possible Deal Opportunities:

1.  Either through negotiations (preferred choice) or through competitive
bidding, become the default service provider for some or all of Com Ed's
industrial customers.  This would allow us to upsell additional products to
the industrial class.
2.  Segregate the commercial customers (100 - 400 Kw) customers from the
residential customers and negotiate to become the default service provider.
3.  Joint venture between ENA and New Power to be the default service
provider for portions of the residential class through an opt-out program
like municipal aggregation or some other format.

Next Steps:

1.  Mark Ulrich is to complete an analysis of the Com Ed proposal in terms of
its impact on our current book of business
2.   Develop a position boiled down to just a few key points that we can push
with regulators and Com Ed.  In a conference call with Harry, Mark, Roy, Sue
and me, we have tentatively distilled the list to the following:
 a.  Default deal for industrial customers
 b.  Negotiate for Com Ed to provide load following and balancing
 c.  Default deal for commercial as opposed to PBR

Janine


Please fined attached translation of articles from Denryoku Business
Sokuhou dated March 7
and the March edition of Energy Forum.

Best regards,
IRJ PR Services

 - Denryoku Business Sokuhou.doc
 - Energy Forum.doc


Re:  Clarksdale see below.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001 01:46 PM -----

	Debra Perlingiere
	05/11/2001 05:04 PM

		 To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: City of Yazoo/Clarksdale  Master Gas Agreements

Attached are drafts of the Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement for gas.  Upon
completion of a guaranty I will incorporate a section for same.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Latest and greatest.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/29/2000 08:44
AM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 02/29/2000 08:37:55 AM
To: "        -         *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" <Scott.Goodell@enron.com>
cc: "        -         *Porter, Jeffrey" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>,
Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, "        -         *Scott, David"
<dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: Re: Updated Mar'00 Requirements Received at 11:25am from CES

Scott--My March '00 first-of-the-month numbers for AGL assumed that the total
daily firm load across all 9 pools would average 36,774 dth/day.  This would
be
met by a combination of maximizing the daily withdrawals from IBSS as well as
the Directly assigned storage supplies with the remainder served by flowing
gas.   On days when the firm requirement falls below the 36,774 (for March 1,
our combined DSR is currently 23,758dth), I don't want to reduce IBSS
withdrawals because we need to maximize those thru March in order to have that
inventory down to the 35% level by March 31.  Otherwise, we could be liable
for
penalties.   Instead, I would prefer to swing on the flowing gas, if necessary
and keep drawing the gas out of storage.

Please call me if you have questions or wish to discuss further.

Scott.Goodell@enron.com on 02/28/2000 04:46:35 PM
Please respond to Scott.Goodell@enron.com

To: Chris.Germany@enron.com
cc: Doug Kinney/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS

Subject: Re: Updated Mar'00 Requirements Received at 11:25am from CES

Doug- Based on these numbers David's w/d from IBSS would be zero, due to
the AGL DSR.
Scott

Chris Germany@ECT
02/25/2000 11:53 AM

To:   Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meredith
      Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe A
      Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda Dempsey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angie
      Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Molly LaFuze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann
      Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan
      Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
      pvillag@columbiaenergy.com, Cindy Vachuska/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clarissa
      Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L
      Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia
      Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Margie
      Straight/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cora Pendergrass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, George
      Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:  Updated Mar'00 Requirements Received at 11:25am from CES

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/25/2000
11:47 AM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 02/25/2000 11:25:22 AM

To:   Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Updated Mar'00 Requirements

Chris--The attached file contains updated needs requirements for March'00.
There are a couple of changes as compared to the update that I sent you
yesterday.  Please note that if you have been looking at the Total Monthly
requirements in the previous versions (in lieu of the daily dth volumes),
the
spreadsheet formula for summing the daily values to a monthly total were
only
picking up the first 29 days of March.  (This spreadsheet was originally
designed for February, which has 29 days.)   This has been corrected in the
attached version.

Sorry for any confusion.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03 00 SUPPLY NEEDS - ALL LDCS


Did you guys hear that Kevin Hannon left ENA to go to ECI.  Something BIG is
happening over there.  I hear rumors that someone higher than that may be
heading over there.
Ben


Kristin,

Yes, we would like very much to have her as a summer intern.
I can take her ino my group.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kristin Gandy @ ENRON                           01/26/2001 04:03 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: FW: Wharton Resume Submission - Summer Intern

Vince,

Can you tell me if these candidates will be part of the program?  I will
generate an offer letter as soon as I know this information.

Thank you,

kristin

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
01/23/2001 01:23 PM
To: Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: FW: Wharton Resume Submission - Summer Intern

Kristin.

Kim is a member of the Tiger Team. She is interested in a summer
internship with Enron and I shall be glad to take her.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001
01:24 PM ---------------------------

"Kim Whitsel" <Kimberly.Whitsel.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu> on 01/22/2001
12:07:35 AM
To: <Christie.Patrick@enron.com>, <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Wharton Resume Submission

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Whitsel [mailto:Kimberly.Whitsel.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 6:51 PM
To: kristin.gandy@enron.com
Subject: Wharton Resume Submission

Summer Position under Wharton Schedule #1823
 - Kim Whitsel -Enron Cover Letter.doc
 - Kim Whitsel- Wharton2 resume.doc


Sounds good Jeff.

Sorry about the last minute changes.

Tuff day at the park huh.
HA HA
Dylan

At 12:00 PM 26-02-01 -0600, Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:

>OK, here's what I propose.  Dylan:  Galant and much appreciated effort to
>quantify the value of the tax shield.  However, my day's completely out of
>control and resolving now may be more than we can manage.  I propose that I
>simply delete the one sentence quantifying the value of the shield and
>leave it as a qualitative statement.  If you folks would like to mess with
>with it some more, that's great with me, it's just that--and I apologize--I
>just won't be able to work on it today.  If you decide to do some more with
>it, go ahead and please bring copies to class.  Otherwise, I'll just delete
>the sentence referenced above, print out, and bring to class.  Just let me
>know.
>
>And Dylan, from someone whose surname gets butchered all the time, my
>apologies for having done the same to yours in the memo.
>
>Best,
>Jeff